alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Task Force Ruffe Control Committee. The meeting topics are identified in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                     

# DATES:

 The Ruffe Control Committee will meet from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 25, 2000 and 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., Thursday, October 26, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

 The Ruffe Control Committee meeting will be held in the Comfort Inn, 4404 I-75 Business Spur, Sault Ste Marie, Michigan. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Sharon Gross, Executive Secretary, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force at 703-358-2308 or by e-mail at:                         *sharon_gross@fws.gov*                         or Thomas Busiahn, Ruffe Control Committee Chair, at 703-358-1718.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Ruffe Control Committee. The ANS Task Force was established by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990. 

Topics to be covered during the Ruffe Control Committee meeting include: the status of existing ruffe populations, a review of the eight components of the ruffe control plan, an evaluation of the bait harvest prohibitions currently in place on Lake Superior, and other topics. 

Minutes of the meeting will be maintained by the Executive Secretary, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Suite 851, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203-1622, and will be available for public inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. 

Dated: September 27, 2000.

Cathleen I. Short, 

Co-Chair, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Assistant Director—Fisheries and Habitat Conservation. 

[FR Doc. 00-25315 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barrington Lindo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), rendered May 28, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court dated July 26, 1989, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

On appeal, the defendant contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel. We agree. It has been consistently recognized that "[w]hat constitutes effective assistance [of counsel] is not and cannot be fixed with yardstick precision, but varies according to the unique circumstances of each representation” *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146). Although the courts have been reluctant to brand an attorney’s performance as ineffective when the course of conduct complained of can be characterized as mere losing tactics or strategy *(see, People v Zaborski,*59 NY2d 863), in the case at bar, defense counsel’s errors cannot be construed as a "misguided though reasonably plausible [defense] strategy” *(People v Bell,*48 NY2d 933, 935). The errors here were sufficiently serious to have deprived the defendant of a fair trial.

The record shows that during the course of the trial, defense counsel opened the door to unduly prejudicial information *559which would have otherwise been inadmissible, including a prior arrest for possession of marihuana which had been excluded by the court’s prior *Sandoval*ruling *(see, People v Wiley,*120 AD2d 66; *People v Ofunniyin,*114 AD2d 1045); delivered a cursory summation, mostly dwelling on the defendant’s prior criminal record *(see, People v Winston,*134 AD2d 546); failed to object to an erroneous jury charge and to inflammatory comments made by the prosecutor *(see, People v Simmons,*110 AD2d 666); and failed to adequately prepare for trial *(see, People v Droz,*39 NY2d 457).

While the various errors committed by defense counsel, considered separately, may not have constituted ineffective assistance of trial counsel, their cumulative effect was to deprive the defendant of meaningful representation in a case where the evidence of guilt was not overwhelming. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 11057 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Shaman Lee Cooper,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22
- CR
- 20 - 1

**____________________ __________**  Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Shaman Lee Cooper has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cooper has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 16, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-11057 Document: 00516789904 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2023No. 22
- 11057

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-11057 Document: 00516789904 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2023
----

NOTICE OF RECRUITMENT

(2006/C 128 A/01)

We are looking for a well educated and experienced professional with experience as a manager and knowledge of education and training to head our Secretariat based in Bramshill, Hampshire, United Kingdom

DIRECTOR

CEPOL, a body of the European Communities, train senior police officers from the European Union. The Secretariat headed by the Director, deals with educational, administrative, financial and logistical support. The establishment of the Secretariat is 22 staff members.

The post holder will be responsible for providing support and advice to the Chair and members of the Governing Board and committees. He/she will supervise the preparation of the Annual Work Programme, of the Annual Budget and of the Annual Report. He/she will negotiate cooperation agreements and represent CEPOL in appropriate EU policing and educational forums.

Since the EU Staff Regulations apply, applicants inter alia must be a national of one of the Member States of the EU and must have thorough knowledge of one of the languages of the Communities and satisfactory knowledge of a second language of the Communities. Furthermore, successful applicants will be required to undergo local security clearance.

For further information and application pack, visit our web site www.cepol.net. Enquiries should be made by e-mail only please to: janos.fehervary@bmi.gv.at

----
#### In the Matter of Congregation Emanu-El of the City of New York et al., Respondents, v Brendan Sexton et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered on February 2, 1990, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Edith Miller, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur— Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
#### GIFFORD v. STATE.

No. 26108.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*44MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while license suspended; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
1

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING FOR BATTERY CHARGERS AND 

EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLIES

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington DC, 20585

Room 8E-089

October 13, 2010

Purpose

DOE is holding this public meeting to discuss the preliminary analyses it has conducted as 

part of the energy conservation standards rulemaking for battery chargers (BCs) and 

external power supplies (EPSs). DOE will also explain its plans for the remaining analyses,

including its methodologies, assumptions, and data sources, and will seek comment on these 

topics.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome

9:05 – 9:10 am Attendee Introductions and Agenda Review

Victor Petrolati

9:10 – 9:30 am Background and Overview

Victor Petrolati

9:30 – 10:00 am Opening Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

10:00 – 10:45 am Product Definitions and Scope

Ari Reeves

10:45 – 11:00 am Break

11:00 – 11:30 am Market Assessment

Daniel Lauf

11:30 am – 12:00 pm Technology Assessment 

Michael Vladimer

12:00 – 1:00 pm Lunch
2

1:00 – 2:00 pm Engineering Analysis

Michael Vladimer and Matthew Nardotti

2:00 – 2:30 pm Energy Use Analysis

Tobias Swope

2:30 – 2:45 pm Product Price Determination

Daniel Lauf

2:45 – 3:15 pm Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses

Matthew Hartley

3:15 – 3:30 pm Break

3:30 – 4:00 pm Shipments and National Impact Analyses

Tobias Swope

4:00 – 4:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Robert Carmichael

4:15 – 4:30 pm NOPR Analyses

Sanaee Iyama

4:30 – 4:55 pm Closing Comments from Participants

4:55 – 5:00 pm Closing Remarks

Victor Petrolati
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Idaho Natural Gas Processed of Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Idaho Natural Gas Processed of Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 1,113  | 4,859  | 3,711  | 1,805  | 1,019 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 94     | 1,352  | 2,868  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Lower 48 States Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Lower 48 States Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36,102 | 66,663 | 74,399 | 52,275
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37,147 | 62,337 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Flavio Moreno Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6556

RODNEY COBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHELLE B. MITCHELL; GARY K. ARONHAIT, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety; DOCTOR FREUND, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1732-AM) Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 13, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Cobbs, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on March 20, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 22, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Rodney Cobbs, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Cobbs v. Mitchell , No. CA-99-1732-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1999 & Mar. 22, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted as Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:

(i.) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 28, 2008 |  | /S/    DARIO
SACOMANI                                              
|                        |  | Dario Sacomani Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:20-mj-02206-LS Document 1 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-mj-02206-LS Document 1 Filed 04/14/20 Page 2 of 2
# Europos Sąjungos C 128A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-5120 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 128A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 49 tomas2006m. birželio 1d. |

ISSN 1725-5120

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 128A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

49 tomas2006m. birželio 1d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Pranešimai |
| | CEPOL |
| 2006/C 128A/1 | Pranešimas apie įdarbinimą | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

III   Pranešimai

CEPOL

2006/C 128A/1

Pranešimas apie įdarbinimą

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

III Pranešimai

CEPOL

| 1.6.2006 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 128/1

---

PRANEŠIMAS APIE ĮDARBINIMĄ

(2006/C 128 A/01)

Ieškome išsilavinusio ir patyrusio specialisto, turinčio vadovo darbo patirties ir pakankamą žinių bei pasirengimo lygį vadovauti mūsų sekretoriatui Bramshille, Hempšyre, Jungtinėje Karalystėje

DIREKTORIAUS PAREIGOMS

CEPOL, Europos Bendrijos institucija, rengia vyresniuosius policijos pareigūnus iš Europos Sąjungos. Sekretoriatas, vadovaujamas direktoriaus, teikia administravimo, finansinę ir logistinę pagalbą. Sekretoriato personalą sudaro 22 darbuotojai.

Užimantis šias pareigas bus atsakingas už Valdybos pirmininko bei valdybos ir komitetų narių konsultavimą ir pagalbos jiems teikimą. Jis (ji) prižiūrės metinės darbo programos, metinio biudžeto ir metinės ataskaitos rengimą. Jis (ji) derėsis dėl bendradarbiavimo sutarčių ir atstovaus CEPOL atitinkamuose ES policijos ir švietimo forumuose.

Pagal ES personalo taisykles, kandidatai turi būti vienos iš ES valstybių narių piliečiai ir privalo puikiai mokėti vieną iš Bendrijos kalbų bei patenkinamai mokėti dar vieną Bendrijos kalbą. Be to, atrinkti kandidatai turės gauti vietinį saugumo leidimą.

Norėdami gauti daugiau informacijos ir paraiškų paketą, apsilankykite mūsų interneto svetainėje www.cepol.net. Paraiškos turi būti siunčiamos tik el. paštu adresu: janos.fehervary@bmi.gv.at

| CEPOL SEKRETORIATAS |
| --- |
| CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom |
| Telefonas + 44 (0) 1256 602668, faksas + 44 (0) 1256 602996 |
| Svetainės adresas internete: www.cepol.net |

CEPOL SEKRETORIATAS

CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom

Telefonas + 44 (0) 1256 602668, faksas + 44 (0) 1256 602996

Svetainės adresas internete: www.cepol.net

---
#### GATES v. STATE.

No. 23985.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

L. E. King, County Atty., Sabine County, of Hemphill, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $50 and thirty days in jail on a charge of swindling.

The same questions of procedure are involved in this case as in Clegg v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 210 S.W.2d 151, and Hogan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 210 S.W.2d 152. They are not companion cases to this one, however. It may be suggested, with some hope of the caution being of value, that it would be difficult to find three cases with more irregularities, both on the part of the prosecution and the defense, than those which appear in these three cases.

In the instant case we find a complaint and information charging swindling in the amount of $52.50 which on its face, as any court and any prosecuting attorney should know, charges a felony of which the county court has no jurisdiction. It must be presented to the district court by indictment.

We note that the charge of the court, submitting the case to the jury, says that the defendant is “charged with the offense of obtaining money from E. N. Polke in the sum of $37.50 by giving to E. N. Polke a check for $52.50.” This charge is not warranted by the record-and cannot be construed to give the county court jurisdiction.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00125-CV

PAY AND SAVE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Roel CANALES,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-16-371

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On February 2, 2021, appellant filed a second motion requesting an extension of time in 

which to file a reply brief. The motion is unopposed.

The motion is GRANTED and appellant’s reply brief is due no later than February 22, 

2021. Further requests for an extension are disfavored.

It is so ORDERED February 3, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 CLERK OF COURT