### METHOD 557: DETERMINATION OF HALOACETIC ACIDS, BROMATE, AND DALAPON IN DRINKING WATER BY ION

CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY (IC-ESI-MS/MS)

A n

n dr

dr e

e w

w W. B

W. B r r ei

ei den bach En En v v i

i r r o

o n

n m en t t a a l

l R

R e

e s

s e

e ar

ar ch C C e

e n

n t

t er er
Cinci Cinci nna nna ti, Ohio ti, Ohio

Office of Water (MLK 140) EPA Document No. 815-B-09-012 September 2009 www.epa.gov/safewaterMETHOD 557 DETERMINATION OF HA LOACETIC ACIDS, BROMATE, AND

DALAPON IN DRINKING WATER BY ION CHROMATOGRAPHY

ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY (IC-ESI-MS/MS)

Version 1.0 September 2009

A. D. Zaffiro and M. Zimmerman (Shaw Environmental, Inc.) B. V. Pepich (U.S. EPA, Region 10 Laboratory) Rosanne W. Slingsby, R. F. Jack and Christopher A. Pohl (Dionex Corporation) D. J. Munch (U.S. EPA, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water)

TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER

OFFICE OF GROUND WATER AND DRINKING WATER

U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

557-1METHOD 557

DETERMINATION OF HALOACETIC ACIDS, BROMATE, AND DALAPON IN DRINKING

WATER BY ION CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY (IC-ESI-MS/MS)

1. SCOPE AND APPLICATION

1.1 Method 557 is a direct-inject, ion chromatograp hy, negative-ion electrospray ionization, tandem mass spectrometry (IC-ESI- MS/MS) method for the determin ation of haloacetic acids in finished drinking water. Bromate a nd dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) may be measured concurrently with the haloacetic acids. Real time, chromatographic separation of common anions in drinking water (matrix elimin ation) is a key feature of this method. Acceptable method performance has been demonstr ated for matrix ion concentrations of 320 mg/L chloride, 250 mg/L sulfate, 150 mg/L bi carbonate and 20 mg/L nitrate. Method 557 requires the use of MS/MS in Multiple Reac tion Monitoring (MRM) mode to enhance selectivity. Precision and accuracy data have been generated for the detection of nine haloacetic acids, bromate, and da lapon in reagent water, synthetic sample matrix, and finished drinking water from both ground water and surf ace water sources. The single laboratory Lowest Concentration Minimum Reporting Leve l (LCMRL) has also been determined in reagent water. Method 557 is applicable for the measurement of the following analytes:

Chemical Abstracts Services Analyte Registry Number (CASRN)

Bromate (BrO 3 - ) 15541-45-4 (BrO 3 - anion)

Bromochloroacetic acid (BCAA) 5589-96-8

Bromodichloroacetic acid (BDCAA) 71133-14-7

Chlorodibromoacetic acid (CDBAA) 5278-95-5

Dalapon 75-99-0

Dibromoacetic acid (DBAA) 631-64-1

Dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) 79-43-6

Monobromoacetic acid (MBAA) 79-08-3

Monochloroacetic acid (MCAA) 79-11-8

Tribromoacetic acid (TBAA) 75-96-7

Trichloroacetic ac id (TCAA) 76-03-9

1.2 The chromatographic and MRM mass spectrometry conditions described in this method were developed using commercially ava ilable IC-ESI-MS/MS systems.

1.3 The single laboratory LCMRL is the lowest spiking concentration such that the probability of spike recovery in the 50% to 150% range is at least 99%. Single laboratory LCMRLs for the analytes in this method ranged from 0.042 to 0.58 microgram per liter ( μ g/L), and are listed in Table 5. The procedure used to determine the LCMRL is described elsewhere. 1

557-21.4 Laboratories using this method are not requi red to determine LCMRLs, but they must demonstrate that the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) for each analyte meets the requirements described in Section 9.2.4.

1.5 Detection Limit (DL) is defined as the statistically calculated minimum concentration that can be measured with 99% confidence that the reported value is greater than zero. 2 The DL is dependent on sample matrix, fo rtification concentration, a nd instrument performance. Determining the DL for analytes in this me thod is optional (Sect. 9.2.6). DLs for method analytes fortified into reagent water ra nged from 0.015 to 0.20 μg/L (Table 6).

1.6 This method is intended for use by analysts sk illed in the operation of IC-ESI-MS/MS instrumentation and the interpretation of the associated data.

1.7 METHOD FLEXIBILITY – The laboratory is permitted to select IC columns, eluent compositions, eluent suppression techniques, a nd ESI-MS/MS conditions different from those utilized to develop the method. However, the basic chromatographic elements of the method

must be retained. In order to avoid the eff ects of matrix suppression, the method analytes must be substantially resolved chromatographi cally from common anions in drinking water. Samples must be analyzed by direct injection. Filtering and pretreatment by use of solid phase extraction are not permitted. At a minimum, the four internal standards prescribed in

this method must be used. Changes may not be made to sample collection and preservation (Sect. 8) or to the quality control (QC) requirements (Sect. 9) . Method modifications should be considered only to im prove method performance. Modifications that are introduced in the interest of reducing cost or sample processing tim e, but result in poorer method performance, may not be used. In all cases where method modifications are proposed, the analyst must perform the procedures outlined in the Initial Demonstration of Capability (IDC, Sect. 9.2), verify that a ll QC acceptance criteria in this method (Tables 11 and 12) are met, and verify method performance in a real sample matrix (Sect. 9.4).

NOTE: Single quadrupole instruments are not permitted.

2. SUMMARY OF METHOD

Residual chlorine present in drinking water samples is reacted with ammonium chloride to form chloramines, effectively preventing chlorine-mediated formation of method analytes during storage. In addition, the combined chlorine residual prevents microbial degradation in the sample. Prior to analysis, isotopically enri ched analytes (monochloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C , monobromoacetic

acid- 1- 13 C , dichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C , and trichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C ) are added to the samples as internal standards. An aliquot of the sample is injected without cleanup or concentration onto an ion exchange column specifically designed to separate method analytes from the following common anions (matrix components) in drinking water: chloride, ca rbonate, sulfate, and nitrate. The matrix components in the column eluate are monitored via conductivit y detection and then diverted to waste; the analytes of interest are directed into the ESI-MS/MS system. Acetonitrile is added post-column to enhance desolvation of the method analytes in the ESI interface. Each

557-3method analyte is qualitatively identified via a uni que mass transition, and the concentration is calculated using the integrated peak area and the internal standard technique.

3. DEFINITIONS

3.1 ANALYSIS BATCH – A sequence of samples, analyzed within a 30-hour period, including no more than 20 field samples. Each Analys is Batch must also include all required QC samples, which do not contribute to the maximum field sample total of 20. The required QC samples include:

Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB), Continuing Calibration Check (CCC) Standards, Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFSM), and Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix Duplicate or Laboratory Duplicate (LFSMD or LD).

3.2 CALIBRATION STANDARD – An aqueous solution of the method analytes prepared from the Primary Dilution Standard (Sect. 3.21) solu tion. The calibration standards are used to calibrate the instrument response with respect to analyte concentration.

3.3 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK – A calibration standard containing the method analytes and internal standards, which is analyzed periodically to verify the accuracy of the existing calibration.

3.4 DETECTION LIMIT (DL) – The minimum concentration of an analyte that can be identified, measured, and reported with 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero. This is a statistical dete rmination (Sect. 9.2.6), and accurate quantitation is not expected at this level.

3.5 DIVERT WINDOW – The period of time during wh ich the column eluate is directed to waste for the purpose of diverting matrix co mponents away from the ESI-MS/MS system.

3.6 ELUTION WINDOW – The period of time during whic h the column eluate is directed to the ESI-MS/MS system for the purpose of measuring the method analytes.

3.7 INTERNAL STANDARD – A pure compound added to all standard solutions and samples

in a known amount. Each internal standard is assigned to a specific analyte or multiple analytes, and is used to measure relative response.

3.8 ION SUPPRESSION/ENHANCEMENT – An observable loss or increase in analyte response in complex (field) samples as comp ared to the response obtained in standard

solutions.

3.9 LABORATORY DUPLICATES (LDs) – Two sample aliquots (LD 1 and LD 2 ) taken in the laboratory from a single sample bottle, and analyzed separately with identical procedures. By cancelling variation contributed from sample collection, preservation, and storage

557-4procedures, Laboratory Duplicates provide an estimate of precision associated specifically with the analytical determination.

3.10 LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK (LFB) – An a liquot of reagent water, containing the method preservative, to which known quantities of the method analytes are added. The LFB is used during the IDC to verify met hod performance for precision and accuracy.

3.11 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX (LFS M) – An aliquot of a field sample to which known quantities of the method analytes are added. The LFSM is processed and analyzed as a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the sample matrix contributes bias to the analytical results.

3.12 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX DUPLICATE (LFSMD) – A second aliquot of the field sample used to prepar e the LFSM which is fortified and analyzed identically to the LFSM. The LFSMD is used instead of the Laboratory Duplicate to assess method precision when the method analytes are rarely found at concentrations greater than

the MRL.

3.13 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SYNTHETIC SAMPLE MATRIX (LFSSM) – Aliquots of the Laboratory Synthetic Sample Matrix (Sect. 3.15) fortifie d with known quantities of the method analytes. The LFSSM is analyzed at th e beginning of each Analysis Batch to verify that the matrix components elute within the di vert windows, and to ensure that no portion of an analyte peak is inadvertently diverted to wa ste. The LFSSM also serves as a QC sample for the purpose of estimating precision and accuracy during the IDC.

3.14 LABORATORY REAGENT BLANK (LRB) – An ali quot of reagent water that contains the preservative and internal standards. The LRB is used to determine if the method analytes or

other interferences are introduced from the laboratory environment, the reagents or glassware, and to test for cross contamination.

3.15 LABORATORY SYNTHETIC SAMPLE MATRIX (LSSM) – For this method, the LSSM is a solution of common anions prepared at high concentrations relative to their typical occurrence in drinking water. Guidance for pr eparation of the LSSM is provided in Section

7.2.

3.16 LOWEST CONCENTRATION MINIMUM REPORTING LEVEL (LCMRL) – The single laboratory LCMRL is the lowest spiking concentration such that the probability of spike recovery in the 50% to 150% range is at least 99%. 1

3.17 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) – Written information provided by vendors concerning a chemical’s toxicity, health hazards, physical properties, fire and reactivity data, storage instructions, spill response procedures, and handling precautions.

3.18 MINIMUM REPORTING LEVEL (MRL) – The minimum concentration that can be reported by a laboratory as a quantified value for the method analyte in a sample following analysis. This concentration must meet the cr iteria defined in Section 9.2.4 and must be no

557-5lower than the concentration of the lowest calibration standard for each method analyte. A laboratory may be required to demonstrate a specific MRL by a regulatory body if this method is being performed for compliance purposes.

3.19 MULTIPLE REACTION MONITORING (MRM) – A mass spectrometric technique in which a precursor ion (Sect. 3.20) is first is olated, then subsequently fragmented into a product ion(s) (Sect. 3.23). Quantitation is accomplished by monitoring a specific product ion. As described in Section 10.2.2, MS para meters must be optimized for each precursor ion and product ion.

3.20 PRECURSOR ION – The precursor ion is the gas-phase species corresponding to the method analyte produced in the ESI interface. In MS/MS, the precursor ion is mass selected and fragmented by collision-activated dissociation to produce distinctive product ions of smaller mass/charge ( m/z ) ratio.

3.21 PRIMARY DILUTION STANDARD (PDS) – An a queous solution containing the method analytes (or internal standards) prepared from Stock Standard Solutions and diluted as needed to prepare calibration standard s and sample fortification solutions.

3.22 PROCEDURAL CALIBRATION – A calibration technique in which calibration standards are processed through the entire method, incl uding sample preparation and addition of preservatives.

3.23 PRODUCT-ION – For the purpose of this method, a product ion is one of the fragment ions produced in MS/MS by collision-activated dissociation of the precursor ion.

3.24 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE (QCS) – A solution containing the method analytes at a known concentration, which is obtained from a sour ce external to the laboratory and different from the source of calibration standards. The purpose of the QCS is to verify the accuracy of the primary calibration standards.

3.25 REAGENT WATER – Purified water that does not contain any measurable quantity of the method analytes or interfering compounds at or above 1/3 the MRL.

3.26 STOCK STANDARD SOLUTION (SSS) – A concentrated solution containing one or more of the method analytes that is prepared in th e laboratory using assayed reference materials or purchased from a reputable commercial source, so that the concentration and purity of analytes are traceable to certificates of analysis.

4. INTERFERENCES

4.1 GLASSWARE – During method development, no problems with stability of the method analytes, interferences, or cross contamination related to glass contai ners were observed. Sample collection bottles and vials containing samples and standards may be reused after thorough rinsing with reagent water. Dry glassware in an oven or air dry. Teflon-faced septa, if not punctured, may be cleaned and reused. Vials containing PDS solutions must be

557-6rinsed with methanol before reuse and the septa discarded. It is recommended that autosampler vials and septa be discarded after a single use.

4.2 REAGENTS AND EQUIPMENT – Method interferences may be caused by contaminants in solvents and reagents (including reagent water). All laboratory reagents must be routinely demonstrated to be free from interferences (less than 1/3 the MRL for the method analytes) under the conditions of the analysis. This may be accomplished by analyzing LRBs as

described in Section 9.3.1.

4.3 MATRIX INTERFERENCES – Matrix interferences are caused by contaminants that are present in the sample. The extent of matrix interferences will vary considerably from source to source depending upon the nature of the wate r. Matrix components may directly interfere by producing a signal at or near the retenti on time of an analyte peak. Matrix components may also suppress or enhance the signal of the method analytes. (Suppression and enhancement effects occur during the ionization process in the electrospray source when a co-eluting contaminant influences the ionization of the analyte of interest.) Common anions present in drinking water matrices, which woul d cause matrix suppression, are diverted from the MS. In addition, the internal standards recommended in this method performed well in a variety of matrices. However, these measures may not compensate for all potential matrix effects. The analysis of Laboratory Fortifie d Sample Matrix (Sect. 9. 3.5) provides evidence for the presence (or absence) of matrix effects.

4.4 INTERFERENCE FROM SYSTEM CONTAMINANTS – Contaminants in the mobile phase, autosampler, column, or other system components may produce a signal at or near the retention time of a method analyte. Such an interfering signal may be observed as a shoulder on an analyte peak or detected as an analyte p eak in the Laboratory Reagent Blank. If this occurs, attempt to eliminate the interference. If unsuccessful, investigate alternate MRM

transitions.

4.5 INTERFERENCE FROM INTERNAL STANDAR DS – Depending on the source and purity, labeled haloacetic acid internal stan dards may contain a small percentage of the corresponding native analyte. Usually, such c ontributions are insignificant when performing

the method within the normal ca libration range of 0.25 to 20 μ g/L. However, the contribution may be significant when attempting to determine LCMRLs and DLs. The labeled internal standards must meet the purity requirements stated in the IDC (Section 9.2.1).

4.6 BREAKDOWN OF DALAPON, CDBAA, AND TBAA IN AQUEOUS MEDIA – Under

the conditions described in Secti on 8, the method analytes are stable in aqueous media within the stated holding time. However, during method development, dalapon, CDBAA, and TBAA—in both standards and drinking water samples—degraded while awaiting analysis in conventional autosamplers that may reach temperatures between 25° and 30 °C during operation. For this reason, refrigerated autosamplers, capable of maintaining samples at a temperature of less than or equal to 10 °C, are required for use with Method 557.

557-74.7 ION SUPPRESSION IN THE PRESENCE OF CHLORITE – The chlorite anion (ClO 2 - ) may be present in drinking water distributi on systems employing chlorine dioxide (ClO 2 ) as a disinfectant. During method development studi es, severe signal suppression of MCAA and excessive band broadening of the MCAA chroma tographic peak profile were observed in the presence of 1 mg/L ClO 2 - , the maximum contaminant level (MCL). As depicted in Figure 4,

the ClO 2 - anion co-eluted with MCAA. Method 557 is not applicable to drinking water

treated with ClO 2 unless the laboratory demonstrates alternate chromatographic conditions (other than those used to develop the method, Section 17, Table 1) that eliminate the suppression. That is, chlorite must be re solved chromatographically from MCAA and the other method analytes. Alternately, the laboratory must demonstrate that the chlorite anion is not present in the sample matrix.

4.8 SIGNAL SUPPRESSION DUE TO EXCESSIVE BACKGROUND CONDUCTIVITY – The ESI interface is sensitive to the background conductivity of column eluate. The analyst should observe the background conductivity prior to starting an analysis sequence each day. If using a concentration gradient, make this observation at the initial eluent concentration. At the maximum concentration in the gradie nt, the background conductivity will increase compared to the conductivity at the initial concen tration. In this region of the chromatogram, the potential for suppression from the background conductivity is greatest. Such suppression may be evidenced by difficulty detecting TBAA, or by peak areas that are low compared to historical values when the background conduc tivity was lower. Section 11.3.2 provides guidance on corrective action if background conductivity is problematic.

4.9 PEAK TAILING – Peak tailing may be observed as the column ages. Peak tailing will limit the analyst’s ability to separate matrix com ponents from the method analytes. Peak tailing should be minimal with a properly configured ion chromatography system when using a new column. (See Figure 2.) If tailing is observed with continued column use, original performance can usually be restored by replacing the guard column.

4.10 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON ANALYTE STABILITY – MBAA CDBAA, and TBAA degrade readily in aqueous eluent at high pH. Such conditions may exist in the mobile phase of ion exchange columns. The reaction is te mperature dependent. For this reason, the separation is performed at s ubambient temperature, specifically 15 °C. At 15 °C, degradation in the column eluent is minimized.

4.11 MANAGING DIVERT WINDOWS – Analyte retention times may slowly shift toward lower values as the column ages or becomes fouled. Because this method employs multiple divert windows, the analyst must monitor peak lo cations on a daily basis to ensure that each analyte peak elutes entirely within the MS /MS elution windows. Guidance for verifying elution/divert windows is provided in Section 10.2.5. To avoid loss of column capacity,

follow the manufacturer’s instructions for proper operating temperature and for storage

conditions when the column is not in use.

4.12 BAND BROADENING AND RETENTION TIME (RT) SHIFTS IN HIGH IONIC STRENGTH MATRICES – Method performance has not been evaluated for matrix ion concentrations exceeding 320 mg/L chloride, 250 mg/L sulfate, 150 mg/L bicarbonate and 20

557-8mg/L nitrate. Near these limits, the analyte peaks will widen, peak height will decrease, and retention times will decrease slightly. Thes e effects are compound dependent, but affect all analytes to some degree. Such effects were minimal in the drinking water matrices evaluated, but were more pronounced in Labora tory Synthetic Sample Matrix. [Compare Figure 3 (fortified tap water) and Figure 4 (fortified synthetic matrix).] Note that the

concentrations of common anions in the LSSM are at the limits listed above. This method requires the analyst to verify method performan ce in LSSM during the IDC, and to verify elution/divert windows on a daily basis in LFSSM to ensure that these windows are properly set to compensate for the potential effects of high ionic strength matrices.

5. SAFETY

5.1 The toxicity and carcinogenicity of each reag ent used in this method has not been precisely

defined. Each chemical should be treated as a potential health hazard and exposure to these

chemicals should be minimized. Each laborator y is responsible for maintaining an awareness of OSHA regulations regarding safe hand ling of chemicals used in this method. 3 The OSHA laboratory standards can be found online at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/labor atories/standards.html . A reference file of MSDSs should be made available to all personnel involved in the chemical analysis.

5.2 Pure standard materials a nd stock standard solutions of the method compounds should be handled with suitable protection for skin, eyes, etc. 4

6. EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES References to specific brands or catalog numbe rs are included as examples only and do not imply endorsement of the product. Such reference does not preclude the use of other vendors or suppliers.

6.1 SAMPLE CONTAINERS – Amber glass bottles fitted with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) -lined screw caps with sufficient volume to allow preparation of all required sample and QC aliquots.

6.2 VIALS FOR SAMPLE PREPARATION – Amber glass vials with PTFE/silicone septa for use preparing field samples and QC samples. Forty-milliliter (mL) volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials (I-Chem Cat. No. S146–0040 or equivalent) were used during method development.

6.3 AUTOSAMPLER VIALS – Glass vials with PTFE/silicone septa.

6.4 MICRO SYRINGES – Suggested sizes incl ude 50, 100, and 1000 microliters (μL).

6.5 VOLUMETRIC PIPETTES – Class A, for preparing calibration standards, and for measuring aliquots of field samp les and QC samples.

6.6 AUTOMATIC PIPETTE – Electronic, with polypropylene tips (Eppendorf Research Pro or equivalent). An automatic pipette is recommended for fortifying samples with internal

standards.

557-96.7 ANALYTICAL BALANCE – Capable of weighing to the nearest 0.0001 gram (g).

6.8 TOP-LOADING BALANCE – Capable of weighing to the nearest 0.01 g. A top-loading balance and disposable pipettes may be used to measure aqueous sa mple volumes and to prepare aqueous calibration standards.

6.9 DESOLVATION GAS – High-purity gas (nitrogen or zero-air) for use in the ESI interface. The specific type of gas, purity and pressure requirements will depend on the instrument manufacturer’s specifications.

6.10 COLLISION GAS – High-purity gas (nitrogen or ar gon) for use in the collision cell of the mass spectrometer. The specific type of gas, purity, and pressure requirements will depend on the instrument manufacturer’s specifications.

6.11 DISPOSABLE PASTEUR PIPETTES – Borosilicate glass, used to transfer samples to autosampler vials and fo r sample preparation.

6.12 ION CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY SYSTEM (IC-ESI-MS/MS) – Th e following specifications are based on use of a Dionex Corporation AS24 ion exchan ge column and a hydroxide-based eluent system. Other columns and eluent systems are permitted providing that the basic chromatographic elements of the method are retained (Sect. 1.7).

6.12.1 IC SYSTEM WITH SUPPRESSED CONDUCTIVITY DETECTION – An analytical system (Dionex ICS-3000 or equivalent) cons isting of a refrigerated autosampler, pump module, anion trap, guard column, anion sepa rator column, a six-port injection valve, sample loop, conductivity suppre ssor, conductivity detector, post-column divert valve, and a data acquisition and management system. The laboratory must be able to acquire and store conductivity data for the purpos e of monitoring matrix components and establishing elution/divert windows.

6.12.1.1 ELUENT GENERATION – Reagent-free elec trolytic eluent generation (Dionex ICS3000 EG or equivalent) or manually prepared reagents may be used. Care must be exercised with manually prepared hydroxide eluent to prevent formation of carbonate in the eluent from exposure to the atmos phere, which could cause analyte retention

times to drift.

6.12.1.2 ANION TRAP – A continuously regenerated anion trap column (Dionex CR-ATC or equivalent).

6.12.1.3 SAMPLE LOOP – 100-μL size. A 100-μL samp le loop was used to generate the data presented in this method. Smaller injec tion volumes may be used as long as the Initial Demonstration of Capability (Sect. 9.2), calibration, and sample analyses are performed using the same injection volume. The laboratory must be able to meet the MRL verification criteria (Section 9.2.4) using the selected injection volume.

557-106.12.1.4 GUARD COLUMN – IonPac ® AG24, 2 x 50 millimeters (mm) (Dionex Part No. 064151 or equivalent). The guard column is generally packed with the same resin as the analytical column.

6.12.1.5 ANALYTICAL COLUMN – IonPac ® AS24, 2 x 250 mm (Dionex Part No. 064153 or equivalent). Any column that pr ovides on-line separation of common anions (chloride, carbonate, sulfate, and nitrate) from the method analytes and symmetrical peak shapes may be used. The column must have sufficient capacity to minimize retention time shifts in high ionic strength matrices.

6.12.1.6 COLUMN COMPARTMENT – Temperature co ntrolled and capable of subambient operation.

6.12.1.7 CONDUCTIVITY SUPPRESSOR – An electrolytic suppressor operated with an external source of regeneration water (D ionex Anion Self Re generating Suppressor

Model No. ASRS ® -300, 2-mm, Part No. 064555 or equivalent). Chemical conductivity suppressors, although not prohib ited, have not been evaluated for use

with Method 557.

6.12.1.8 CONDUCTIVITY DETECTOR – A flow-through detector with an internal volume that does not introduce analyte band broadening.

6.12.1.9 POST-COLUMN DIVERT VALVE – A two-position, six-port valve may be used. All wetted parts must be of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) construction. The proper placement of the divert valve in the samp le path is illustrated in Figure 1.

6.12.2 AUXILIARY PUMP – Pump capable of precis ely delivering flow rates between 0.2 and

0.3 mL/minute. This pump is used to mix acetonitrile into the s uppressed eluent postcolumn. (Dionex high performance metering pump, Model No. AXP-MS or equivalent). See Figure 1 for placement of the pump in the sample path.

6.12.3 STATIC MIXING TEE – High pressure, microbore mixing tee. (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA, Part No. U-466 or equivalent ). The proper placement of the mixing tee in the sample path is illustrated in Figure 1.

6.12.4 ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION – TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETER (ESI – MS/MS) – The mass spectrometer interface must be able to operate in the negative-ion electrospray ionization mode. The system mu st be capable of performing MS/MS to produce unique product ions for the method an alytes within specified retention time windows. Method performance data presente d in Section 17 were collected using a Waters Quattro Premier XE ESI-MS/MS system.

6.12.5 MS/MS DATA SYSTEM – An interfaced data sy stem is required to acquire, store, and output MS data. The computer software must have the capability of processing stored data by recognizing a chromatographic peak within a given retention time window. The software must allow integration of the ion abundance of any specific ion between

557-11specified time or scan number limits. The software must be able to construct a linear regression or quadratic calibration curve and calculate analyte concentrations using the internal standard technique.

7. REAGENTS AND STANDARDS

7.1 REAGENTS AND SOLVENTS – Reagent grade or better chemicals must be used. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents will conform to the specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society (ACS), where such specifications are available. Other grades may be used if all the requirements of the IDC are met when using these reagents.

7.1.1 ACETONITRILE (CAS No. 75-05-8) – Post-col umn organic modifier. High purity, demonstrated to be free of analytes and interferences (Honeywell Burdick & Jackson

Brand ® , Catalog No. 015 or equivalent).

7.1.2 METHYL-TERTIARY-BUTYL ETHER (MtBE, CAS No. 1634-04-4) – Highperformance liquid chromatography-grade (Sigma-Aldrich Catalog No. 34875 or equivalent). MtBE is used to prepare dilutions of neat standard materials.

7.1.3 AMMONIUM CHLORIDE (NH 4 Cl, CAS No. 12125-02-9) – Method preservative.

7.1.4 SODIUM BICARBONATE (CAS No. 144-55-8) – Laboratory Synthe tic Sample Matrix

component.

7.1.5 SODIUM CHLORIDE (CAS No. 7647-14-5) – Laboratory Synthe tic Sample Matrix

component.

7.1.6 SODIUM NITRATE (CAS No. 7631-99-4) – Laboratory Synthetic Sample Matrix

component.

7.1.7 SODIUM SULFATE (CAS No. 7757-82-6) – Laboratory Synthetic Sample Matrix

component.

7.2 LABORATORY SYNTHETIC SAMPLE MATRIX (LSSM) – Prepare the LSSM at the

concentrations listed in the table below. The required concentrations of nitrate (20 mg/L), bicarbonate (150 mg/L), chloride (250 mg/L), and sulfate (250 mg/L) are based on the mass of the anion, not the sodium salt. The NH 4 Cl preservative is included in the matrix. LFSSM QC samples (Sect. 3.13) can be prepared by diluting the Analyte PDS (Sect. 7.3.2.2) with the synthetic matrix solution.

557-12Compound Empirical

Fo rmula Salt (g fw) a Anion (gfw) Salt Mass (mg) H 2 O, L Conc. Stock (mg/L) b Conc. LSSM (mg/L) c

Ammonium chloride (preservative) NH 4 Cl 53.49 500 1000 100

Nitrate anion NO 3 - 84.99 62.00 137 200 20

Bicarbonate anion HCO 3 - 84.01 61.02 1030 0.5 1500 150

Chloride anion Cl

­ 58.44 35.45 2060 2500 250

Sulfate anion SO 4 -­ 142.04 96.06 1850 2500 250

a

b gfw = gram formula weight of the sodium salt.

Stock concentration = (salt mass)(gfw anion)/(gfw salt)(0.5 L).

c 1:10 dilution of stock (e.g., 50 mL to 500 mL), LSSM = Laboratory Synthetic Sample Matrix

.

7.3 STANDARD SOLUTIONS – Solution concentrations listed in this section were used to develop this method and are included only as examples. Guidance on the storage stability of Primary Dilution Standards and ca libration standards is provided in the applicable sections

below.

NOTE: When preparing aqueous solutions from MtBE stock solutions, do not add more than 0.5% of MtBE relative to the total water volume. MtBE has limited water solubility (~5%).

7.3.1 INTERNAL STANDARDS – This method requires four isotopically enriched internal standards. The following table lists the requi red internal standards and current sources.

Internal Standard CASRN a Neat Materials Catalog No. Solution Standards (100 0 μg/mL in MtBE), Cat. No.

Mono chloroacetic acid -2

­ 13 C 1633-47-2 Sigma-Aldrich 488526 Dionex Corp. 069406

Monobromoacetic acid- 1

­ 13 C 57858-24-9 Sigma-Aldrich 279331 Dionex Corp. 069407

Dichloroacetic acid- 2

­ 13 C 286367-78-0 Sigma-Aldrich 485489 Dionex Corp. 069408

Trichloroacetic acid- 2

­ 13 C Not available Custom synthesis b Dionex Corp. 069409

a CASRN = Chemical Abstract Registry Number.

b Isotec, a member of the Sigma-Aldrich Group ( www.sigma-aldrich.com/isotec ).

NOTE: TCAA[1- 13 C] may NOT be substituted for TCAA[2- 13 C]. TCAA[1- 13 C] has been demonstrated to convert to the native TCAA analyt e in the ESI interface, theoretically via gasphase exchange with carbon dioxide- 12 C in the ionization region of the source. The process is temperature dependent (desolvation gas te mperature) and was observed on all MS/MS platforms evaluated during method development.

7.3.1.1 INTERNAL STANDARD STOCK STANDARDS (ISSS) (1000 μg/mL) – Prepare individual solutions of MCAA[2- 13 C], MBAA[1- 13 C], DCAA[2- 13 C], and TCAA[2­

13 C] by weighing 15 mg of the solid material into a 15-mL vial and adding 15 mL of MtBE. Alternately, obtain the internal sta ndards from outside suppliers as solutions in MtBE at 1000 μg/mL.

7.3.1.2 INTERNAL STANDARD PRIMARY DILUTION STANDARD (Internal Standard PDS) (1.0 μg/mL) – Prepare the Internal Standard PDS by adding enough of each ISSS to a known volume of reagent water to make the final concentration 1.0 μg/mL (e.g., combine 100 μL of each ISSS into 100 mL reagent water). Store the PDS in a

557-13glass vial with a PTFE/silicone septum. During method development, addition of 160 μL of the Internal Standard PDS to each 40-mL field sample, QC sample, or calibration standard produced a final conc entration of 4.0 μg/L. Analysts are permitted to use other PDS concentrations and volumes provided all field samples, QC samples, and calibration st andards contain the same am ount of internal standard,

the concentration of the internal standard added provides adequate signal to maintain precision (as defined in the IDC), and the vol ume added has a negligible effect on the final concentration. The aqueous Internal Standard PDS is stable for 60 days when

stored at 4 °C.

7.3.2 ANALYTE STANDARD SOLUTIONS

7.3.2.1 ANALYTE STOCK STANDARD SOLUTION (1000 μg/mL) – Obtain the haloacetic acid analytes listed in the table in Section 1.1 as certified solutions in MtBE. Obtain bromate as a certified aqueous standard. Obtain dalapon as a certified standard in MtBE or in methanol. Representative sources are listed in the table in

Section 7.3.2.2.

7.3.2.2 ANALYTE PRIMARY DILUTION SOLUTION (Analyte PDS) (1.0 μg/mL) – Prepare the Analyte PDS by diluting of the Analyte Stock Standard solutions into reagent water. Store the PDS in a glass vial with a PTFE/silicone septum. The Analyte PDS is used to prepare calibration standards, and to fortify QC samples with the method analytes. An example preparati on of the Analyte PDS that was used to collect data presented in Section 17 is provided in the table below.

Analyte

Stock Catalogue

Number Stock

Concentration
( μ g/mL) Stock

Volume

(mL) Final Volume (mL reagent water) Analyte PDS

Concentration
( μ g/mL)

B romate,

aqueous Ultra Scientific

Cat. No. ICC-010 1000 as bromate

anion 0.05

50 1.0 Dalapon in

methanol Ultra Scientific

Cat. No. HB-140 100 0.50

Haloacetic

acids inmethyl-tertbutyl ether Restek Cat.

No. 31896 1000 0.05

NOTE: Storage stability of the Analyt e PDS was evaluated during method development at a single concentration of 1.0 μ g/mL. The aqueous Analyte PDS is stable for 60 days when stored at 4 °C. Other PDS concentrations may be selected. However, it is recommended that the laboratory independently assess the stability of the aqueous PDS to determine safe storage time.

7.3.2.3 CALIBRATION STANDARDS – This method uses a procedural calibration technique. Prepare procedural calibration st andards by diluting the Analyte PDS into reagent water containing 100 mg/L NH 4 Cl (preservative). A calibration range of 0.25

to 20 μ g/L is recommended as a starting point and is adequate for most drinking

water sources. The lowest concentration calib ration standard must be at or below the

557-14MRL. A constant amount of each internal standard is added to each calibration standard. The calibration standards may also be used as CCCs. An example of the dilutions (starting with the Analyte PDS) necessary to prepare the calibration standards is provided in the table below.

Dilution Aliquot Starting

Concentration
( μ g/L) Fina l Volume (mL, 100 mg/L ammonium

chloride, aqueous) Final

Concentration
( μ g/L) Int ernal Standard

Concentration a
( μ g/L) 2 mL Analyte PDS 1000 50 40 (WS) a 4.0

20 mL of WS 40 40 20 4.0

10 mL of WS 40 40 10 4.0

5 mL of WS 40 40 5.0 4.0

2 mL of WS 40 40 2.0 4.0

1 mL of WS 40 40 1.0 4.0

4 mL of 5 μ g/L std. 5.0 40 0.50 4.0

2 mL of 5 μ g/L std. 5.0 40 0.25 4.0

a Internal standards added at the rate of 160 μ L to 40 mL by use of an Eppendorf Research Pro pipette:

(0.16 mL)(1.0 μ g/mL)/(0.040 liter) = 4.0 μ g/L internal standard concentration

b WS = working standard; not analyzed.

NOTE: The stability of calibration sta ndards was evaluated during method development at concentrations of 2.0 and 5.0 μ g/L. The aqueous calibration standards are stable for 14 days when stored at 4 °C in glass vials with PTFE/silicone septa. It is recommended that the laboratory independently assess the stability of the aqueous calibration standards to determine safe storage time.

8. SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE

The preservation requirements for Method 557 are id entical to those sti pulated in EPA Method 552.3, Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Da lapon in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid
Microextraction, Derivatization, and Gas Chro matography with Electron Capture Detection

. 5

8.1 SAMPLE BOTTLE PREPARATION

8.1.1 SAMPLE CONTAINERS – Amber glass bottles with PTFE-lined screw caps and sufficient capacity to allow subsequent preparation of all required sample and QC aliquots.

8.1.2 ADDITION OF PRESERVATIVE – Prior to shipment to the field, add crystalline or granular NH 4 Cl to the sample containers to produ ce a concentration of 100 mg/L in the field sample. For example, a 250-mL sample requires 25 mg of NH 4 Cl.

8.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION – Grab samples must be collected in accordance with conventional sampling practices. 6 Fill sample bottles taking care not to flush out the ammonium chloride. Because the method analytes are not volatile, it is not necessary to ensure that the sample bottles are completely headspace-free.

557-158.2.1 SAMPLING FROM A TAP – When sampling from a cold water tap, remove the aerator, open the tap, and allow the system to flush until the water temperature has stabilized (approximately three to five minutes). Collect a representative sample from the flowing system using a beaker of appropriate size. Use this bulk sample to generate individual samples as needed. Invert the vials several times to mix the sample with the preservation

reagent.

8.3 SAMPLE SHIPMENT AND STORAGE – Samples must be chilled during shipment and must not exceed 10 °C during the first 48 hours af ter collection. Samples must be confirmed to be at or below 10 °C when they are received at the laboratory. In the laboratory, samples must be stored at or below 6 °C and protected from light until analysis. Samples must not be

frozen.

8.4 SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES – Samples must be an alyzed within 14 days of collection. Chlorinated field samples that are preserved in accordance with the method guidance should not exhibit biological degradation of analyt es during the allotted 14-day storage time. The residency time in the autosampler must be included when calculating the holding time from collection until analysis.

9. QUALITY CONTROL

9.1 QC requirements include the IDC and ongoing QC requirements. This se ction describes each QC parameter, its required freque ncy, and the performance criteria that must be met in order to satisfy EPA quality objectives. The QC criteria discussed in the following sections are summarized in Section 17, Tables 11 and 12. These QC requirements are considered the minimum acceptable QC program. Laboratories are encouraged to institute additional QC practices to meet their specific needs.

9.2 INITIAL DEMONSTRATION OF CAPABILITY (IDC) – The IDC must be successfully performed prior to analyzing any field samples. The IDC must be repeated if changes are made to analytical parameters not previously validated during the IDC, for example, selection of an alternate MRM transition or changing the internal standard assignment of an analyte. Prior to conducting the IDC, the analyst must verify proper timing of elution windows and divert windows (Section 10.2.5), and meet the calibration require ments outlined in Sections

10.2 and 10.3.

9.2.1 DEMONSTRATION OF LOW SYSTEM BACKGROUND – Analyze an LRB.

Confirm that the blank is free of contam ination as defined in Section 9.3.1.

NOTE: Depending on the source and purity, labele d haloacetic acid internal standards may contain a small percentage of the corresponding native analyte. Therefore, the analyst must demonstrate that the internal standards do not contain the unlabeled analytes

at a concentration > 1/3 of the MRL when added at th e appropriate c oncentration to samples. An internal standard concentr ation of 4.0 μg/L was used during method development. Lower concentrations may be used providing the internal standard QC criteria (Sect. 9.3.4) are met.

557-16NOTE: The method must be checked for cross co ntamination (commonly referred to in the environmental laboratory community as “carryover”) by analyzing an LRB immediately following the highest calibration standard. If this LRB does not meet the criteria outlined in Section 9.3.1, then carryover is present and the cause must be

identified and eliminated.

9.2.2 DEMONSTRATION OF PRECISION – Prepare and analyze seven replicate LFBs and seven replicate LFSSMs. Fortify these samples near the midrange of the initial

calibration curve. The NH 4 Cl preservative must be added to the LFBs as described in Section 8.1.2. The percent relative standard deviation (RSD) of the concentrations of the replicate analyses must be ≤ 20% for all method analytes.

Standard Deviation of Measured Concentrations % RSD = × 100 Average Concentration

9.2.3 DEMONSTRATION OF ACCURACY – Using the sa me sets of replicate data generated for Section 9.2.2, calculate the average percent recovery. The average percent recovery of the replicate analyses must be within + 30% of the true value.

Average Measured Concentration % Recovery = × 100 Fortifie d Concentration

9.2.4 MINIMUM REPORTING LEVEL (MRL) CONFIRMATION – Establish a target concentration for the MRL based on the intended use of the method. Analyze an initial calibration following the procedures in Sec tion 10.3. The lowest calibration standard used to establish the initial calibration (as well as the low-level CCC) must be at or below the concentration of the MRL. Establishing the MRL concentration too low may cause repeated failure of ongoing QC requirements. Confirm the MRL following the procedure

outlined below.

9.2.4.1 Fortify and analyze seven replicate LFBs at or below the proposed MRL

concentration. The LFBs must contain the method preservative as specified in Section 8.1.2. Calculate the mean ( Mean ) and standard deviation for these replicates. Determine the Half Range for the Prediction Interval of Results ( HR PIR ) using the equation

HR PIR = 3.963 S

where S is the standard deviation and 3.963 is a constant value for seven replicates. 1

9.2.4.2 Confirm that the Upper and Lower limits for the Prediction Interval of Results ( PIR =

Mean + HR PIR ) meet the upper and lower recovery limits as shown below.

The Upper PIR Limit must be ≤ 150 percent recovery.

557-17Mean + HR PIR × 100 ≤ 150% FortifiedConcentration

The Lower PIR Limit must be ≥ 50 percent recovery.

Mean − HR PIR × 100 ≥ 50% FortifiedConcentration

9.2.4.3 The MRL is validated if both the Upper and Lower PIR Limits meet the criteria

described above. If these cr iteria are not met, the MRL has been set too low and must be confirmed again at a hi gher concentration.

NOTE: These equations are only valid for seven replicate samples.

9.2.5 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE (QCS) – Analyze a mid-level Quality Control Sample (Sect. 9.3.7) to confirm the accuracy of the primary calibration standards.

9.2.6 DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION (optional)

– While DL determination is not a specific requirement of this method, it may be required by various regulatory bodies associated with compliance monitoring. It is the responsibility of the laboratory to

ascertain whether DL determination is re quired based upon the intended use of the data.

Analyses for this procedure must be done over at least three days. Prepare at least seven replicate LFBs at a concentration estimated to be near the DL. This concentration may be estimated by selecting a concentration at two to five times the noise level. The NH 4 Cl preservative must be added to the samples as described in Section 8.1.2. Process the seven replicates through all steps of Section 11.

NOTE: If an MRL confirmati on data set meets these requirements, a DL may be calculated from the MRL confirmation data, and no additional analyses are necessary.

Calculate the DL using the following equation:

DL = S x t (n-1,1- α = 0.99)

where

t (n-1,1- α = 0.99) = Student's t value for the 99% confidence level with n-1 degrees of freedom (for seven replicate dete rminations, the Student’s t value is 3.143 at a 99% confidence level), n = number of replicates, and

S

= standard deviation of replicate analyses.

NOTE: Do not subtract blank values when performing DL calculations.

557-189.3 ONGOING QC REQUIREMENTS – This section de scribes the ongoing QC elements that must be included when processing and analyzing field samples. Table 12 summarizes these requirements.

9.3.1 LABORATORY REAGENT BLANK (LRB) – Analyze an LRB during the IDC and with each Analysis Batch. The LRB must contain the NH 4 Cl preservative and the internal standards at the same concentration used to fortify all field samples and calibration standards. Background from method analytes or contaminants that interfere with the measurement of method analytes must be <1/3 the MRL. If method analytes are detected in the LRB at concentrations equal to or greater than this level, then all data for the problem analyte(s) must be considered invalid for all samples that yielded a positive

result. Subtracting blank values from sample results is not permitted.

NOTE: Although quantitative data below the MR L may not be accurate enough for data reporting, such data are useful in determinin g the magnitude of background interference. Therefore, blank contaminati on levels may be estimated by extrapolation when the

concentration is below the MRL.

9.3.2 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK (CCC) – Analyze CCC standards at the beginning of each Analysis Batch, after every ten field samples, and at the end of the Analysis Batch. See Section 10.4 for con centration requirements and acceptance criteria

for CCCs.

9.3.3 LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK (LFB) – Because this method utilizes procedural calibration standards, which are fortified reagent waters, there is no difference between the LFB and the Continuing Calibration Check st andard. Consequently, the analysis of a separate LFB is not required as part of the ongoing QC; however, the term “LFB” is used for clarity in the IDC.

9.3.4 INTERNAL STANDARDS (IS) – The analyst must monitor the peak areas of the internal standards in all injections of the Anal ysis Batch. The internal standard responses (as indicated by peak areas) for any chromatographic run must not deviate by more than

± 50% from the average areas measured durin g the initial calibration for the internal standards. If an IS area for a sample does not meet this criterion, check the corresponding IS area of the most recent CCC and proceed as follows.

9.3.4.1 If the IS criterion is met in the CCC but not the sample, reanalyze the sample in a subsequent Analysis Batch. If the IS area fails to meet the acceptance criterion in the repeat analysis, but passes in the most recent CCC, report the sample results as “suspect/matrix.”

9.3.4.2 If both the original field sample and the CCC fail the IS area criterion, take corrective action (e.g., Sect. 10.4.3). After servicing the instrument, re-inject the sample in a subsequent Analysis Batch. If the IS area fails to meet the acceptance criterion in the

557-19repeat analysis, but passes in the most recent CCC, report the sample results as “suspect/matrix.”

9.3.5 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX (LFSM) – Within each Analysis Batch, analyze a minimum of one LFSM. Th e background concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be determined in a separate aliquot and subtracted from the measured values in the LFSM. If various sample matrices are analyzed regularly, for example, drinking water processed fro m ground water and surface water sources, performance data must be collected for each source.

9.3.5.1 Prepare the LFSM by fortifying a sample with an appropriate amount of the Analyte PDS (Sect. 7.3.2.2). Generally, select a spiking concentration that is greater than or equal to the native concentration for most analytes. If the native concentrations of method analytes do not allow this criterion to be met without exceeding the calibration range, dilution with reagent water containing NH 4 Cl (100 mg/L) is permitted. Selecting a duplicate aliquot of a sample that has already been analyzed aids in the selection of an appropriate spiking level. If this is not possible, use historical data when selecting a fortifying concentration.

9.3.5.2 Calculate the percent recovery (%R) using the equation:



## ( A - B 

## ) %R = × 100 C

where A = measured concentration in the fortified sample,

B = measured concentration in the unfortified sample, and

C = fortification concentration.

9.3.5.3 Recoveries for samples fortified at concentrations near or at the MRL (within a factor of two times the MRL concentration) must be within + 50% of the true value. Recoveries for samples fortified at all other concentrations must be within + 30% of the true value. If the accuracy for any analyte falls outside the designated range, and the laboratory performance for that analyte is shown to be in control in the CCCs, the recovery is judged matrix bi ased. Report the result for the corresponding analyte in the unfortified sample as “suspect/matrix.”

NOTE: In order to obtain meaningful percent recovery results, correct the measured values in the LFSM and LFSMD for the native levels in the unfortified samples, even if the native values are less than the MRL. This situation and the LRB are the only permitted uses of analyte results below the MRL.

9.3.6 LABORATORY DUPLICATE OR LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX DUPLICATE (LD or LFSMD) – Within each Analysis Batch, analyze a minimum of one Laboratory Duplicate or one Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix Duplicate. If the method analytes are not routinely observed in field samples, analyze an LFSMD rather

than an LD.

557-20NOTE: The variation due to the addition of inte rnal standards must be included in the precision estimate. Therefore, first split the or iginal sample and then fortify each aliquot

with internal standards.

9.3.6.1 Calculate the relative percent difference (RPD) for duplicate measurements (LD 1 and

LD 2 ) using the equation:

LD 1 − LD 2 RPD = × 100 

## ( LD 1 + LD 2 

## ) / 2

9.3.6.2 RPDs for Laboratory Duplicates must be ≤ 30%. Greater variability may be observed when Laboratory Duplicates have analyte con centrations that are near or at the MRL (within a factor of two times the MRL concentration). At these concentrations, Laboratory Duplicates must have RPDs that are ≤ 50%. If the RPD of an analyte falls outside the designated range, and the laboratory performance for the analyte is shown to be in control in the CCC, the precision is judged matrix influenced. Report the result for the corresponding analyte in the unfortified sample as “suspect/matrix.”

9.3.6.3 If an LFSMD is analyzed instead of a Laboratory Duplicate, calculate the RPD for the LFSM and LFSMD using the equation:

LFSM − LFSMD RPD = × 100 

## ( LFSM + LFSMD 

## ) /2

9.3.6.4 RPDs for duplicate LFSMs must be ≤ 30%. Greater variability may be observed when the matrix is fortified at analyte concentrati ons near or at the MRL (within a factor of two times the MRL concentration). LFSMs at these concentrations must have RPDs

that are ≤ 50%. If the RPD of an analyte falls outside the designated range, and the laboratory performance for the analyte is shown to be in control in the CCC, the precision is judged matrix influenced. Re port the result for the corresponding analyte in the unfortified sample as “suspect/matrix.”

9.3.7 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE (QCS) – A QCS must be analyzed during the IDC, and then at least quarterly thereafter. Fortif y the QCS near the midpoint of the calibration range. The acceptance criteria for the QCS are the same as the mid- and high-level CCCs (Sect. 10.4). If the accuracy for any analyte fails the recovery criterion, prepare fresh standard dilutions and repeat the QCS evaluation.

9.4 METHOD MODIFICATION QC REQUIREMENTS – The laboratory is required to perform the procedures in this section if chromatogr aphic conditions and a suppression technique are

selected which are different from those utiliz ed to develop the method. Any proposed

method modifications must retain the basic chromatographic elem ents of this new technique (Sect. 1.7). Examples of met hod modifications include alternat e IC columns, an injection volume less than 100 uL, and additional internal standards proposed for use with the method.

557-219.4.1 Each time method modifications are made, op timize the elution gradient to accomplish separation of the method analytes from matrix components, and then verify elution and divert windows following the guidance in Sec tion 10.2.5. Establish an acceptable initial calibration (Sect. 10.3). Finally, repeat the procedures of the IDC (Sect. 9.2).

9.4.2 The analyst is also required to evaluate and document method performance for the proposed modifications in real matrices that span the range of waters that the laboratory analyzes. This additional step is required because modifications that perform acceptably in the IDC, which is conducted in reagent water and synthetic matrix, could fail ongoing method QC requirements in real matrices. This is partic ularly important for methods subject to matrix effects, such as IC/MS- based methods. For example, a laboratory may routinely analyze drinking water from muni cipal treatment plants that process ground water, surface water, or a blend of surface and ground water. In this case, the method modification requirement could be accomplished by assessing precision and accuracy (Sects. 9.2.2 and 9.2.3) in a surface water with moderate to high total organic carbon (e.g., 2 mg/L or greater) and a hard ground water (e.g., 250 mg/L as calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent, or greater).

9.4.3 The results of Sections 9.4.1 and 9.4.2 must be appropriately documented by the analyst and independently assessed by the laboratory’s QA officer prior to analyzing field samples. When implementing method modi fications, it is the responsibility of the laboratory to closely review the results of ongoing QC, and in particular, the results associated with the LFSM (Sect. 9.3.5), LFSMD (Sect. 9.3.6), CCCs (Sect. 9.3.2), and

the internal standard area counts (Sect. 9.3.4). If rep eated failures are noted, the

modification must be abandoned.

10 CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION

10.1 Demonstration and documentation of acceptable MS calibration and initial analyte calibration are required before performing the IDC and prior to analyzing field samples. Prior to calibration, the analyst must verify the proper timing of divert windows as described in Section 10.2.5. The initial calibration must be repeated each time a major instrument modification or maintenance is performed.

10.2 IC-ESI-MS/MS CALIBRATION AND OPTIMIZATION

10.2.1 MASS CALIBRATION – Method 557 requires the monitoring of low-mass, negatively charged ions within nominal m/z range of 35 to 251. Calib rate the mass spectrometer with the calibration compounds and procedures sp ecified by the manufacturer. Verify the mass assignment accuracy for each precursor ion and each product ion by comparing the reported centroid mass to the theoretical mass. (Pay particular attention to the chlorine product ion at nominal m/z 35, actual m/ z 34.97.) Low signal response could result if mass assignments are not centered on the detected mass peaks. If the reported masses

differ from the calculated masses and low res ponse is observed, the standard calibration procedure may be inadequate for this met hod. Consult the MS/MS manufacturer for an

557-22appropriate low-mass calibrati on procedure. During method development, accurate mass assignments were achieved after calibration via direct infusion of sodium formate (10 nanograms per microliter) in 90:10 2-propanol:water, rather than the sodium iodide and cesium iodide mixture typically em ployed for Waters MS/MS systems.

10.2.2 OPTIMIZING MS PARAMETERS – Each IC-ESI -MS/MS system will have different optimal conditions, which are influenced by th e source geometry and system design. Due to the differences in design, follow the recommendations of the instrument manufacturer when tuning the instrument. During the development of this method, instrumental parameters were optimized for the precursor and product ions listed in Section 17, Table

3. Because the method analytes are relatively small molecules, the selection of precursor and product ions is limited. Ho wever, transitions other than those listed exist, and the optimum choice depends on the instrument platform as noted below.

NOTE: Several instrument platforms were in vestigated during method development. The most abundant precursor ions differed depe nding on the design of the ESI interface. In particular, the trihaloacetic acids contai ning bromine tend to undergo neutral loss in the ESI interface. For example, the precursor ions for BDCAA, CDBAA, and TBAA used during method development (Table 3) are 44 mass units less than the molecular ion, corresponding to loss of a carboxyl group (COO - ). However, using other ESI designs,

the m/z 207 precursor ion for BDCAA was observe d, which corresponds to the mass of

the molecular ion. BDCAA and TBAA exhib ited neutral loss on all ESI-MS/MS systems evaluated. The most abundant product ions also differed between instruments. Although the mass transitions in Table 3 are provided as a guide, the analyst must empirically

determine the most abundant precursor and product ions.

10.2.2.1 Optimize the ESI-MS/MS at the analytical fl ow rate (column eluent plus post-column acetonitrile addition) via split infusion or flow injection analysis (FIA). Use solutions having concentrations between 1 and 5 μg/mL of the method analytes in reagent water for split infusion, and solutions havi ng concentrations between 10 and 100 μg/L (0.01 and 0.1 μ g/mL) in reagent water for FIA. Five- or 10- μ L sampling loops are recommended for optimizing via FIA. Because the precursor and product ions may

be identical for some of the haloacetic acids, individual solutions of the method analytes are recommended for this step.

10.2.2.2 Using Table 3 as a guide, select the mo st abundant precursor ion. Optimize the response of the precursor ion for each anal yte by infusing the prepared solutions (Sect. 10.2.2.1) directly into mobile phase (or via FIA). Vary the ESI parameters (probe orientation, capillary extension, source voltages, source and desolvation temperatures, gas flows, etc.) and the MS parameters until optimal analyte responses are determined. The method analytes may ha ve different optima, thus requiring some compromise. ESI-MS/MS systems are subject to drift, which can affect run-to-run precision. Accordingly, the optimal cond itions may be those that yield adequate response while minimizing the potential for drift.

557-2310.2.2.3 Using Table 3 as a guide, select the most abundant product ion. Optimize the response of the product ion for each analyte by infusing the prepared solutions (Sect. 10.2.2.1) directly into the mass spectrometer (or via FIA). Vary the MS/MS parameters (collision gas pressure, collision energy, etc.) until optimal analyte responses are determined.

10.2.3 ION CHROMATOGRAPHY INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS – Follow the column manufacturer’s guidelines for calculating the elution gradient to accomplish separation of the method analytes from matrix components. IC operating conditions for the Dionex

AS24 column 7 used during method development are su mmarized in Section 17, Table 1.

Establish divert windows for the matrix co mponents and elution windows for the method analytes per the column manufacturer’s instru ctions. Figure 2 presents an example of these windows optimized for the Dionex AS24 column. Conditions different from those described in this method (e.g., IC columns and mobile phases) may be used if the QC criteria in Sections 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 are met, the column provides reasonable resolution of the method analytes, and chromatographic sepa ration of the method analytes from matrix anions (chloride, carbonate, sulfate, nitrate) is achieved.

10.2.4 ESTABLISH IC-ESI-MS/MS RETENTION TI MES AND MRM SEGMENTS – Inject a mid- to high-level calibration standard under optimized IC-ESI-MS/MS conditions to

obtain the retention times of each method an alyte. Divide the chromatogram into segments that contain one or more chromatographic peaks. For maximum sensitivity in subsequent MS/MS analyses, minimize the num ber of MRM (Sect. 3.19) transitions that are simultaneously monitored within each segment. Table 2 presents the assignment of the method analytes and internal standards into each of the three MRM windows used during method development.

10.2.5 VERIFY ELUTION AND DIVERT WINDOWS FOR MATRIX ELIMINATION – Conduct the following tests and verify that the timing of the elution and divert windows

meet the stated criteria.

10.2.5.1 Stabilize the chromatographic system and analyze an LFSSM at 10 μg/L. Locate the first and last analyte peak in each elution window. Display the corresponding conductivity trace and note the peak star t and peak end times for the chloride, carbonate, sulfate, and nitrate matrix ani ons. Consider a conductivity signal of ~5 μS as the peak end (return to baseline) after elution of a matrix anion. [Refer to figures 4 and 5 for an example based on us e of the Dionex AS24 column. For this column, the chloride anion elutes between elution window 1 and elution window 2. Carbonate, sulfate and nitrate anions el ute between elution windows 2 and 3.]

10.2.5.2 For the first analyte in each elution window, calculate a maximum time for the preceding valve switch: RT – (1.5)(peak width at base of the first analyte in the window). For the last analyte in each el ution window, calculate a minimum time for the following valve switch: RT + (1.5)(peak width at base of the last analyte in the window). Verify that the valve switch times set in step 10.2.3 do not overlap the

calculated times.

557-24NOTE: The actual valve switch times are set in accordance with the column manufacturer’s guidelines (Section 10.2.3). These could be wider than the start and

end times for the elution windows calculated using the equations in this section.

10.2.5.3 By inspection, verify that matrix peaks have returned to baseline before the calculated valve switch at the beginning of each elution window. By inspection, verify that the valve switch at the beginni ng of each divert window occurs before a matrix component begins to elute. Finall y, verify that each an alyte elutes entirely within the established elution windows. If these conditions are not met, consult the column manufacturer’s guidelines for adjusting the elution gradient and reset the timing of the divert valve accordingly.

NOTE: Enough time should be allowed for the baseline to stabilize between the valve switch that begins each elution window and the appearance of the subsequent analyte signal. If the valve switch is too close to the analyte, the starting point of the analyte peak may be difficult to di stinguish from the baseline disruption, especially for low analyte concentrations.

10.3 INITIAL CALIBRATION

10.3.1 CALIBRATION STANDARDS – Prepare a set of at least five calibration standards as described in Section 7.3.2.3. The analyt e concentrations in the lowest calibration

standard must be at or below the MRL. Field samples must be quantified using a calibration curve that spans the same concentration range used to collect the IDC data (Sect. 9.2), i.e., analysts are not permitted to use a restricted calibration range to meet the IDC criteria and then use a larger dynamic range during analysis of field samples.

10.3.2 CALIBRATION – Calibrate the IC-ESI-MS/MS system using peak areas and the internal standard technique. Fit the calibration points with either a linear regression or quadratic regression (response vs. concentration). Weig hting may be used. Forcing the calibration curve through the origin is not recommended. The MS/MS instrument used during method development was calibra ted using inverse concentr ation-weighted quadratic

curves.

NOTE: Internal standard assignments appropria te for the Dionex AS24 column for each method analyte are presented in Table 3, and the mass transitions for the internal standards are provided in Table 4. MCAA must always be referenced to MCAA[2- 13 C]. MBAA must always be referenced to MBAA[1- 13 C]. Method 557 was validated with bromate referenced to MBAA[1- 13 C]; however, MCAA[2- 13 C] could be used if all requirements in the IDC are met, as well as all ongoing QC requirements.

10.3.3 CALIBRATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA – Validate the initial calibration by calculating the concentration of the analytes for each of the analyses used to generate the calibration curve by use of the regressi on equations. Calibration points that are ≤ MRL

must calculate to be within + 50% of their true value. All other calibration points must

557-25calculate to be within + 30% of their true value. If these criteria cannot be met, the analyst will have difficulty meeting ongoing QC criteria. In this case, corrective action is recommended such as reanalyzing the calibration standards, restricting the range of calibration, or performing instrument maintenance.

10.4 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECKS (CCCs) – Analyze a CCC to verify the initial calibration at the beginning of each Analysis Batch, after every tenth field sample, and at the end of each Analysis Batch. The beginning CCC for each Analysis Batch must be at or below the MRL. This CCC verifies instrument sensitivity prior to the analysis of samples. Alternate subsequent CCCs between the remaining calibration levels.

10.4.1 Verify that the absolute areas of the quantita tion ions of each of the internal standards have not changed by more than ± 50% from the average areas measured during the initial calibration. If this limit is exceeded, verify that the background conductivity is in control following the guidance in Section 11.3.2. If the background conductivity is normal, remedial action may necessary (Sect. 10.4.3).

10.4.2 Calculate the concentration of each anal yte in the CCC. The CCC fortified at ≤ MRL

must calculate to be within + 50% of its true value. CCCs fortified at all other levels must

calculate to be within + 30%. If these limits are exceeded, then all data for the failed analytes must be considered invalid. Any field samples analyzed since the last acceptable CCC that are still within holding time must be reanalyzed after an acceptable calibration

has been restored.

10.4.3 REMEDIAL ACTION – Failure to meet CCC QC performance criteria requires remedial action. Acceptable method performance may be restored simply by flushing the column at the highest eluent concentration in the gradient. Following this and other minor remedial action, check the calibration with a mid-level CCC and a CCC at the MRL, or alternatively recalibrate according to Section 10.3. If internal standard and calibration failures persist, maintenance may be required, such as servicing the ESI-MS/MS system and replacing IC columns. These later measures constitute major maintenance, and the analyst must return to the initial calibration step (Sect. 10.3) and verify sensitivity by analyzing a CCC at or below the MRL.

11. PROCEDURE

11.1 This section describes the procedures for sample preparation and analysis. Important aspects of this analytical procedure include proper sample collection and storage (Sect. 8), ensuring that the instrument is properly calibrated (Sect. 10), and that all required QC elements are included (Sect. 9).

11.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION

11.2.1 All field and QC samples must contain the pr eservative listed in Section 8.1.2, including the LRB. In the laboratory, maintain field samples, QC samples, and calibration

557-26standards at or below 6 °C at all times, including the time these are resident in the autosampler awaiting injection.

11.2.2 Do not filter the samples. Add an appropriate volume of the Internal Standard PDS (Sect. 7.3.1.2) to a known volume of sample, cap, and mix well. The concentration of the internal standards must be the same in the samples as in the calibration standards. Transfer an aliquot of each field or QC sample to an autosampler vial. For example, weigh 40 mL of sample into a 40-mL VOA vial using a top loading balance and a disposable, glass pipette. Add 160 uL of the internal standard PDS (1.0 μg/mL) to achieve a concentration of 4.0 μg/L in the sample. Mix well and transfer 1.5 mL to an autosampler vial by use a disposable pipette.

11.3 SAMPLE ANALYSIS

11.3.1 Establish IC-ESI-MS/MS operating conditi ons per the guidance in Section 10.2.

11.3.2 Flush the column at the highest eluent concentration in the gradient for at least 15 minutes prior to beginning each analysis sequenc e. This step is especially important for minimizing background conductivity if the column has been installed in the system and held at the starting eluent c oncentration for extended periods.

NOTE: During method development, the background conductivity ranged from 0.3 to

2.2 microsiemens (μS). If an internal standard or analyte area response is low due to high background conductivity, flush the column at the maximum eluent concentration in the gradient and observe the conductivity signal until the background stabilizes at less than

2.5 μS. Also, ensure that the suppressor is functioning properly or replace the suppressor to troubleshoot the problem. Occasional overnig ht flushing of the column will minimize the occurrence of high background conductivity.

11.3.3 VERIFY ELUTION AND DIVERT WINDOWS - Analyze Laboratory Synthetic Sample Matrix fortified at 10 μg/L. Verify the elu tion and divert windows as specified in Section

10.2.5. This verification must be done prior to beginning each Analysis Batch.

11.3.4 THE ANALYSIS BATCH – Establish a valid initial calibration following the procedures outlined in Section 10.3 and confirm that the calibration is valid by analyzing a CCC at or

below the MRL as described in Section 10.4. Alternately, verify that an existing calibration, established for a previous Analysis Batch, is still valid by analyzing a CCC at or below the MRL. Next, analyze an LRB. Continue the Analysis Batch by analyzing aliquots of field and QC samp les at appropriate frequencies (Section 9.3), employing the optimized conditions used to acquire the initial calibration. Analyze a mid- or high-level CCC after every ten field samples and at the end each Analysis Batch.

NOTE: Each Analysis Batch must begin with the analysis of a CCC at or below the MRL for each analyte that the laboratory intends to report, followed by the analysis of an LRB. This is true whether or not an initial calibration is analyzed. After 20 field samples the low-level CCC and the LRB must be repeated to begin a new Analysis Batch. The

557-27acquisition start time of the mid-level CCC at the end of the Analysis Batch must be within 30 hours of the acquisition start time of the low-level CCC at the beginning of the Analysis Batch. Do not count QC samples (LRBs, LDs, LFSMs, LFSMDs) when calculating the frequency of CCCs that are required during an Analysis Batch.

12. DATA ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS

12.1 Establish an appropriate retention time window for each analyte to identify them in QC and field sample chromatograms. Base this assignment on measurements of actual retention time variation for each compound in standard soluti ons over the course of time. The suggested variation is plus or minus three times the stan dard deviation of the retention time for each compound for a series of injections. The inj ections from the initial calibration and from the IDC (Sect. 9.2) may be used to calculate the retention time window. However, the experience of the analyst should weigh heavily on the determination of an appropriate range.

12.2 At the conclusion of data acquisition, use the same software settings established during the calibration procedure to identify peaks of in terest in the predetermined retention time windows. Confirm the identify of each analyte by comparison of its retention time with that of the corresponding analyte peak in an initial calibration standard or CCC.

12.3 Calculate analyte concentrations using the multi point calibration established in Section 10.3. Report only those values that fall between th e MRL and the highest calibration standard. Samples with analyte responses that exceed th e highest calibration standard require dilution and reanalysis (Sect. 12.7).

NOTE : In validating this method, concentrati ons were calculated using the product ions listed in Table 3 of Section 17. Other ions may be selected at the discretion of the analyst as

discussed in Section 10.2.2.

12.4 Calculations must use all available digits of precision, but final reported concentrations should be rounded to an appropria te number of significant figures (one digit of uncertainty), typically two, and not more than three significant figures.

12.5 Prior to reporting the data, the chromatograms must be reviewed for any incorrect peak identifications or improper integration.

12.6 Prior to reporting data, the laboratory is respons ible for ensuring that QC requirements have been met and that any appropriate qualifier is assigned.

12.7 EXCEEDING THE CALIBRATION RANGE – The analyst must not extrapolate beyond the established calibration range. If an analyte result exceeds the range of the initial calibration curve, the sample may be diluted using reagent water containing 100 mg/L NH 4 Cl with the appropriate amount of in ternal standard added to match th e original level. Re-inject the diluted sample. Incorporate the dilution factor into final concentration calculations. The resulting data must be annotated as a dilution, and the reported MRLs must reflect the

dilution factor.

557-2813. METHOD PERFORMANCE

13.1 PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND DETECTION LI MITS – The method performance data presented in Section 17 were collected using the IC conditions listed in Table 1 and the Waters Quattro Premier XE ESI-MS/MS system. ESI-MS/MS conditions for the Waters system are presented in Table 2. Tables 3 and 4 list the mass transitions for each analyte and internal standard, internal standard assignment s, and observed retention times associated with the method performance results. LCMRLs and DLs are presented in Tables 5 and 6. Single laboratory precision and accuracy data are presented for four water matrices: reagent water (Table 7), LSSM (Table 8), chlorinated (fin ished) ground water (Table 9), and chlorinated (finished) surface water (Table 10). Figure 1 depicts the post-column sample path as previously cited in this document (Sect. 6.12). Figures 2 through 4 are chromatograms of the method analytes in reagent water, drinking water, and LSSM obtained under the conditions employed during method development. Figure 4 was acquired with the inclusion of mass transitions for the chlorite and chlorate anions to mark their position in the chromatogram relative to the method analytes. Figure 5 is a corresponding conductivity trace for the analyte chromatogram presented in Figure 4 showing the location of matrix anions, chlorite anion,

and chlorate anion.

13.2 SECOND LABORATORY EVALUATION – The performance of this method was demonstrated by a second laboratory using an API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with resu lts similar to those reported in Section 17. The authors wish to acknowledge the Southern Nevada Water Authority (Las Vegas, NV) for

their contribution to the method development effort.

14. POLLUTION PREVENTION

14.1 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratory operations, consult “Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction” available from the American Chemical Society’s Depart ment of Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Washington, D.C., 20036, or online at http://www.ups.edu/x7432.xml

.

15. WASTE MANAGEMENT

15.1 The analytical procedures described in this method generate relatively small amounts of waste since only small amounts of reagents and so lvents are used. The matrix of concern is finished drinking water. However, the Agen cy requires that laboratory waste management practices be conducted consistent with all applicable rules and regulations, and that laboratories protect the air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from fume hoods and bench operations. In additi on, compliance is required with any sewage discharge permits and regulations , particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management, see the publications of the American Chemical Society’s Laboratory Environment, Health & Safety

Task Force on the Internet at http://membership.acs.org/c/ccs/publications.htm . Additional

557-29waste management information can be f ound in “Laboratory Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention,” Copyright © 1996 Battelle Seattle Research Center, which can be

located at http://www.p2pays.org/ref/01/text/00779/ch05.htm

.

16. REFERENCES

1. Winslow, S. D.; Pepich, B. V.; Martin, J. J.; Hallb erg, G. R.; Munch D. J.; Frebis, C. P.; Hedrick, E. J.; Krop, R. A. Statistical Procedures for De termination and Verifica tion of Minimum Reporting Levels for Drinking Water Methods. Environ. Sci. Technol . 2006; 40, 281-288.

2. Glaser, J.A.; Foerst, D.L.; McKee, G.D.; Quave, S.A.; Budde, W.L. Trace Analyses for

Wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981 ; 15, 1426-1435.

3. Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories ; 29 CFR 1910.1450, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1990.

4. Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories ; American Chemical Society Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety, 7 th Edition: Washington, D.C., 2003.

5. Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Da lapon in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid
Microextraction, Derivatization, and Gas Chro matography with Electron Capture Detection ; U.S. EPA Method 552.3, EPA 815-B-03-002.

6. Standard Practice for Sampling Water from Closed Conduits ; ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Section 11, Volume 11.01, D3370-08; American Soci ety for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 2008.

7. Application Note 217 , Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA.

557-3017. TABLES, DIAGRAMS, FLOWCHARTS, AND VALIDATION DATA

TABLE 1. ION CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS USED TO COLLECT METHOD

PERFORMANCE DATA

Parameter Conditions a

Column Dionex IonPac ® AS24 250 mm x 2 mm i.d.

Precolumn Dionex IonPac ® AG24 50 mm x 2 mm i.d. Column compartment

temperature 15 oC Autosampler tray

temperature 4 oC

Hydroxide gradient 7 mM for -1 to16.8 min, then 18 mM for 16.8 to 34.2 min, then 60 mM for 34.4 to 51.2 min, then 7 mM for 51.4 to 56 min

Eluent flow rate 0.30 mL/min

Post-column solvent 100% acetonitrile at 0.2 mL/min Suppressor Dionex ASRS ® 300 2 mm, external water mode

Matrix diversion divert

windows 0 to 8 min, 16.5 to 21.2 min, and 33 to 39.2 min

Sample volume 100-μL loop

a The chromatograms presented in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 were obtained under these conditions.

TABLE 2. WATERS QUATTRO PREMIER XE ACQUISITION CONDITIONS USED

TO COLLECT METHOD PERFORMANCE DATA a

Analyte Transition ( m/z ) Dwell

(seconds) Periods Cone (V) Co llision Energy (V)

IS b : Monochloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 94/35 0.4

MRM

Window 1 -15 -8

Monochloroacetic acid 93/35 1.2 -15 -8

IS: Monobromoacetic acid- 1- 13 C 138/79 0.4 -15 -10

Monobromoacetic acid 137/79 0.4 -15 -10

Bromate 127/111 0.4 -25 -18
Dalapon 141/97 0.5

MRM

Window 2 -18 -8

IS: Dichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 128/84 0.5 -17 -10

Dichloroacetic acid 127/83 0.5 -17 -10

Bromochloroacetic acid 173/129 0.5 -17 -10

Dibromoacetic acid 217/173 0.5 -18 -12

IS: Trichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 162/118 0.5

MRM

Window 3 -16 -8

Trichloroacetic acid 161/117

163/119 0.5 -16 -8

Bromodichloroacetic acid 163/81 1.0 -25 -10

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 207/79 1.0 -28 -10

Tribromoacetic acid 251/79 1.0 -28 -12

a Source block: 120 °C, desolvation gas: 350 °C @ 940 liters /hour, capillary: -2.8 V, collision pressure: 5.5x10 -3

torr (0.15 flow @ 7 psig), cone flow: 100 liters/hour, extractor: -3 V, RF lens: -0.5 V, acetonitrile flow rate: 0.2

mL/min.

b IS = internal standard.

557-31TABLE 3. IC-ESI-MS/MS ANALYTE RETENTI ON TIMES, PRECURSOR AND PRODUCT

IONS

Analyte Retention Time a
(min) Internal Standard Assignment Precursor Product

Monochloroacetic acid 12.62 MCAA[2- 13 C] 93 35

Monobromoacetic acid 14.05 MBAA[1- 13 C] 137 79

Bromate 14.93 MBAA[1- 13 C] 127 111

Dalapon 23.33 DCAA[2- 13 C] 141 97

Dichloroacetic acid 24.26 DCAA[2- 13 C] 127 83

Bromochloroacetic acid 26.16 DCAA[2- 13 C] 173 129

Dibromoacetic acid 28.89 DCAA[2- 13 C] 217 173

Trichloroacetic acid 41.08 TCAA[2- 13 C] 161 117

Trichloroacetic acid (alternate) TCAA[2- 13 C] 163 119

Bromodichloroacetic acid 42.89 TCAA[2- 13 C] 163 81

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 45.50 TCAA[2- 13 C] 207 79

Tribromoacetic acid 49.22 TCAA[2- 13 C] 251 79

a Dionex AS24 column (used to co llect method performance data).

TABLE 4. IC-ESI-MS/MS INTERNAL STANDARD RETENTION TIMES,

PRECURSOR AND PRODUCT IONS

, nternal 6 tandard Retention Time a

(minutes) Precursor Product

Monochloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 12.56 94 35

Monobromoacetic acid- 1- 13 C 14.05 138 79

Dichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 24.21 128 84

Trichloroacetic acid- 2- 13 C 41.08 162 118

a Dionex AS24 column (used to co llect method performance data).

557-32TABLE 5. IC-ESI-MS/MS LOWEST CONCENTRATION MINIMUM REPORTING LEVEL (LCMRL)

Analyte LCMRL Fortification Levels (μg/L) Calculated LCMRL (μg/L)

Monochloroacetic acid 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.58

Monobromoacetic acid 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75,

2.0 0.19

Bromate 0.025, 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.042

Dalapon 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.41

Dichloroacetic acid 0.025, 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.13

Bromochloroacetic acid 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0. 50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.16

Dibromoacetic acid 0.025, 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.062

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0. 75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.25

Bromodichloroacetic acid 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75,

2.0 0.19

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 0.050, 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75,

2.0 0.080

Tribromoacetic acid 0.10, 0.25, 0.375, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0 0.27

TABLE 6. IC-ESI-MS/MS DETECTION LIMITS (DL) a

Analyte Fortification Level (μg/L) Calculated DL (μg/L)

Monochloroacetic acid 0.25 0.20

Monobromoacetic acid 0.10 0.064

Bromate 0.025 0.020
Dalapon 0.25 0.038

Dichloroacetic acid 0.10 0.055

Bromochloroacetic acid 0.25 0.11

Dibromoacetic acid 0.025 0.015

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 0.10 0.090

Bromodichloroacetic acid 0.050 0.050

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 0.10 0.041

Tribromoacetic acid 0.25 0.067

a DLs calculated using data acquired over the course of three days (n=7 sample replicates).

557-33TABLE 7. IC-ESI-MS/MS PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF METHOD ANALYTES FORTIFIED AT 1.0 AND 15 μg/L IN REAGENT WATER

Analyte Fortified Conc. = 1.0 μg/L

(n=7) Fortified Conc. = 15 μg/L

(n=8)

Mean % Recovery Relative Standard

Deviation Mean % Recovery Relative Standard

Deviation

Monochloroacetic acid 101 3.5 101 1.7

Monobromoacetic acid 97.5 3.7 99.8 1.8

Bromate 93.3 2.4 104 7.8
Dalapon 97.4 4.7 100 3.3

Dichloroacetic acid 109 2.6 97.0 6.5

Bromochloroacetic acid 103 2.9 107 4.4

Dibromoacetic acid 104 9.0 111 6.7

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 99.1 2.3 99.8 3.2

Bromodichloroacetic acid 105 3.7 97.7 2.2

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 90.4 5.9 103 5.4

Tribromoacetic acid 101 5.3 98.9 3.0

TABLE 8. IC-ESI-MS/MS PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF METHOD ANALYTES FORTIFIED AT 1.0 AND 15 μg/L IN SYNTHETIC SAMPLE MATRIX

Analyte Fortified Conc. = 1.0 μg/L

(n=8) Fortified Conc. = 15 μg/L

(n=8)

Mean % Recovery Relative Standard

Deviation Mean % Recovery Relative Standard

Deviation

Monochloroacetic acid 109 4.8 101 4.1

Monobromoacetic acid 97.2 5.3 99.7 4.6

Bromate 117 11 109 11
Dalapon 113 4.5 93.2 6.6

Dichloroacetic acid 89.9 9.3 90.9 8.7

Bromochloroacetic acid 84.9 9.3 82.8 10

Dibromoacetic acid 91.0 14 84.5 10

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 107 5.4 101 1.1

Bromodichloroacetic acid 91.6 4.7 91.0 4.1

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 98.8 7.2 97.6 6.2

Tribromoacetic acid 94.0 5.4 97.6 2.5

557-34TABLE 9. IC-ESI-MS/MS PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF METHOD ANALYTES FORTIFIED AT 2.5 AND 10 μg/L IN CHLORINATED GROUND WATER a

Analyte Native Conc.,

μ g/L (n=6) Fortified Conc. = 2.5 μg/L
(n=8) Fortified Conc. = 10 μg/L
(n=8)

Mean % Recovery b Relative Standard

Deviation Mean % Recovery b Relative Standard

Deviation

Monochloroacetic acid 0.57 95.9 4.7 99.6 5.2

Monobromoacetic acid 0.41 101 2.1 101 1.8

Bromate 0.56 107 7.3 102 4.8
Dalapon 0.37 95.5 3.1 98.5 3.0

Dichloroacetic acid 4.3 99.7 6.2 106 1.7

Bromochloroacetic acid 3.4 95.2 5.6 93.5 3.1

Dibromoacetic acid 2.0 95.2 8.1 99.3 6.2

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 2.6 101 1.8 102 2.8

Bromodichloroacetic acid 2.6 91.2 2.0 99.0 3.6

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 1.7 103 3.6 102 7.2

Tribromoacetic acid 0.24 97.6 1.9 95.8 1.9

a Ground water physical parameters: pH = 7.45; total hardness = 308 milligrams/liter (mg/L) (as CaCO 3 ); free chlorine =

0.94 mg/L.
b Recoveries corrected for native levels in the unfortified matrix.

TABLE 10. IC-ESI-MS/MS PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF METHOD ANALYTES FORTIFIED AT 2.5 AND 8.0 μg/L IN CHLORINATED SURFACE WATER a

Analyte Native Conc.,

μ g/L (n=6) Fortified Conc. = 2.5 μg/L
(n=8) Fortified Conc. = 8.0 μg/L
(n=7)

Mean % Recovery b Relative Standard

Deviation Mean % Recovery b Relative Standard

Deviation

Monochloroacetic acid 2.6 97.9 3.5 98.8 3.0

Monobromoacetic acid 0.66 99.3 1.4 101 1.6

Bromate 0.85 99.0 8.8 103 10
Dalapon 0.72 97.8 3.8 96.3 4.8

Dichloroacetic acid 15 79.6 6.3 80.0 6.0

Bromochloroacetic acid 6.4 87.2 9.0 90.2 9.2

Dibromoacetic acid 1.6 106 10 95.8 6.0

Trichloroacetic acid – m/z 163/119 11 95.6 2.5 97.1 1.4

Bromodichloroacetic acid 4.7 99.9 4.6 97.9 4.9

Chlorodibromoacetic acid 1.2 102 5.9 102 11

Tribromoacetic acid 0.081 99.5 3.9 103 4.7

a Surface water physical parameters: pH = 7.43; total hardness = 154 milligrams/liter (mg/L) (as CaCO 3 ); free chlorine =

2.7 mg/L; total chlorine = 3.7 mg/L.
b Recoveries corrected for native levels in the unfortified matrix.

557-35TABLE 11. INITIAL DEMONSTRATION OF CAPABILITY (IDC) QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

Method

Reference Requirement Specification and Frequency Acceptance Criteria

Section

9.2.1 Demonstration of low system background Analyze a Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB) prior to any other Initial IDC steps. Demonstrate that all method analytes are <1/3 of the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) and that possible interferences from reagents and glassware do not prevent the identification and quantitation of method analytes.

Section

9.2.1 Test for system

carryover Analyze an LRB after the high calibration standard during the IDC

calibration. Demonstrate that the method analytes

are <1/3 of the MRL.

Section

9.2.2 Demonstration of precision Analyze 7 replicate Laboratory Fortified Blanks (LFBs) and 7 Laboratory Fortified Synthetic Sample Matrix samples (LFSSMs) fortified near the midrange

concentration. Percent relative standard deviation

must be ≤ 20%.

Section

9.2.3 Demonstration of

accuracy Calculate average recovery for replicates used in Section 9.2.2. Mean recovery within + 30% of the true

value.

Section

9.2.4 MRL

confirmation Fortify and analyze 7 replicate LFBs at the proposed MRL concentration. Confirm that the Upper Prediction Interval of Results (PIR) and Lower PIR (Sect. 9.2.4.2) meet the recovery criteria. Upper PIR ≤ 150%

Lower PIR ≥ 50%

Section

9.2.5 Quality Control Sample (QCS) Analyze mid-level QCS. Results must be within + 30% of the

true value.

557-36TABLE 12. ONGOING QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

Method

Reference Requirement Specification and Frequency Acceptance Criteria

Section

11.3.3 Verify divert

windows Analyze a Laboratory Fortified Synthetic Sample Matrix (LFSSM) prior to each Analysis Batch. See Section 10.2.5 for acceptance

criteria.

Section

10.3 Initial calibration Use the internal standard calibration technique to generate a linear or quadratic calibration

curve. Use at least five standard

concentrations. Validate the calibration curve as described in

Section 10.3.3. When each calibration standard is calculated as an unknown using the regression equations, the lowest

level standard must be within + 50% of the true value. All other points

must be within + 30% of the true

value.

Section

9.3.1 Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB) Analyze one LRB with each Analysis Batch. Demonstrate that all method analytes are below 1/3 the Minimum Reporting Level (MRL), and that possible interference from reagentsand glassware do not prevent identification and quantitation of method analytes.

Section

10.4 Continuing Calibration Check (CCC) Verify initial calibration by analyzing a low-level CCC at the beginning of each Analysis Batch. Subsequent CCCs are required after every 10 field samples, and after the last field sample in a

batch. The lowest level CCC must be

within + 50% of the true value. All other points must be within + 30% of

the true value.

Results for field samples that are not bracketed by acceptable CCCs are

invalid.

Section

9.3.4 Internal standard (IS) Isotopically labeled internal

standards are added to all standards and samples. Peak area counts for each IS must be

within ± 50% of the average peak

areas in the initial calibration.

Section

9.3.5 Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFSM) Analyze one LFSM per Analysis Batch. Fortify the LFSM with method analytes at a concentration greater than the native concentrations of most analytes.

Calculate LFSM recoveries. For LFSMs fortified at concentrations < 2 x MRL, the result must

be within + 50% of the true value. At concentrations greater than the 2 x MRL, the result must be within

+ 30% of the true value.

Section

9.3.6 Laboratory FortifiedSample Matrix Duplicate (LFSMD) or Laboratory Duplicate (LD) Analyze at least one LFSMD or LD with each Analysis Batch. For LFSMDs or LDs, relative percent differences must be ≤ 30%. ( ≤ 50% if concentration < 2 x MRL.)

Section

9.3.7 Quality Control Sample (QCS) Analyze mid-level QCS at least quarterly. Results must be + 30% of the true

value.

557-37Figure 1. Divert valve placement in sample path.

557-38Figure 2. Dionex AS24 column: procedural calibration standard (5 μg/L).557-39Figure 3. Dionex AS24 column: tap water fortified at 8 μg/L.557-40Figure 4. Dionex AS24 column: synthetic sample matrix fortified at 5 μg/L plus chlorite (1 mg/L) and chlorate (0.5 mg/L).557-41Figure 5. Dionex AS24 column: conductivity trace, synthetic sample matrix plus chlorite (1 mg/L) and chlorate (0.5 mg/L).557-42