alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Illinois Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Illinois Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5292 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5292

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Syloboc K-200.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Syloboc K-200.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYLOBOC K-200.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Silicon dioxide,    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 7631-86-                                                 12/31/2015
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2811.22.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,357
<PP&E>                                       2,380,251
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,494,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,217,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,303
<BONDS>                                        305,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     598,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,217,711
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,547
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,688
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BRUNK v. STATE.

No. 26805.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1954.

Thfeo. Pat Henley, San. Antonio, for appellant.

Austin F. Anderson, Crim. Dist. Atty., Richard J. Woods, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

.The offense is robbery; the punishment, 25 years.

No statement of- facts áccompanies the record. - ■

Appellant’s sole bill of exception is addressed to the motion to quash the indictment, because it was signed by someone other than the regular foreman of the grand jury. Article 396, C.C.P., states that an indictment should be signed by the foreman. However, Article 512, C.C.P., precludes an exception based upon the want of his signature.

In Parkinson v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 176, 220 S.W. 774, the indictment was signed by a member of the grand jury who was not the foreman. We upheld its validity. See also Branch’s Ann.P.C., Sec. 513, p. 264. Also Note 20 under Article 396, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

In any event, the courtls qualification of the bill recites that one .Allison was, appointed foreman when the grand jury was impaneled, that later he made it known to the court that he. would be temporarily absent, and the court then appointed Loughlin (who signed the instant indictment) to act as foreman and caused the order of appointment to be entered in the minutes of the court.

Such action is in accordance with the provisions of Article 370, C.C.P.

No error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is.affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL
PASO DIVISION

SANDRA JULISSA SANTOS MEJIA,
IZABETTY ISAAC DONATIEN, ABIGAIL
ARGUETA GUTIERREZ, MARIBEL LOPEZ
VELAZQUEZ, MARIELA MESA LAVERDE, §
and ROSA ESTELA TEMU GONZALEZ,

Petitioners-Plaintiffs,
Vv. EP-20-CV-00108-FM
JOSE A. RENTERIA, Officer in Charge,
EI Paso Processing Center, COREY PRICE,
Field Office Director, El Paso Field Office,
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director,
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
and CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security,

Respondents-Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the Court is Petitioners, Sandra Julissa Santos Mejia, Izabetty Isaac Donatien,
Abigail Argueta Gutierrez, Maribel Lopez Velazquez, Mariela Mesa La Verde and Rosa Estela
Temu Gonzalez, and Respondents (hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”) “Joint Stipulation of
Dismissal (“Joint Stipulation”). Therein, the Parties stipulate that Petitioners’ claims against
Respondents are dismissed with Prejudice, and all parties shall pay their own costs and fees.

The Parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the

Stipulation for Compromise Agreement between and among the parties.


After due consideration and in accordance with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Court ORDERS:

All claims presented by Plaintiffs’ Complaint are dismissed with prejudice.

All pending motions, if any, are denied as moot and the clerk shall CLOSE this case.
The Court shall retain supplemental and/or ancillary jurisdiction for the purposes of
enforcing the settlement agreement between and among the parties, as this settlement
agreement will affect the disposition of the underlying suit and enforcement of this
settlement agreement will enable the Court to function effectively, manage its

proceedings, vindicate its authority, and effectuate its decrees.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 29" day of April, 2020.
i. AG

FRANK MONTALVO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 10.4.4**

 

**Loan No. ML0936T2A**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT**

** **

**THIS****FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT**** **(this “Amendment”) isentered into as of September 12, 2005, between **MONARCHUTILITIES I L.P.**(formerly known as Tecon Water Company, L.P.), aTexas limited partnership (the “Company”), and **CoBANK,ACB, **a federally charteredinstrumentality of the United States****(“CoBank”).

 

**BACKGROUND**

 

The Company and CoBank are parties to a PromissoryNote and Supplement dated as of May 1, 2002 and numbered ML0936T2 (the “Supplement”).Since the date of the Supplement, the Company has changed its name from TeconWater Company, L.P. to Monarch Utilities I L.P. The parties now desire to amendthe Supplement to reflect the change in the Company’s name.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**forgood and valuable other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby established, the parties agree as follows:

 

**SECTION 1.         Amendment**.  Thename of the Company is hereby amended from “Tecon Water Company, L.P.” to “MonarchUtilities I L.P.”. Wherever in the Supplement the name “Tecon Water Company,L.P.” appears, it shall be deemed to mean “Monarch Utilities I L.P.”

 

**SECTION 2.         Confirmation**. This Amendment reflects the entire understanding between the partieswith respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as modified hereby, theSupplement shall remain in full force and effect as written.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the dateshown above by their duly authorized officers:

 
|   |   | **CoBANK, ACB**,                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | a federally chartered instrumentality |
|   |   | of the United States                  |
|   |   | By:                                   | /s/ Illegible |
|   |   | Name:                                 | Illegible |
|   |   | Title:                                | Vice President |
|   |   |                                  |
|   |   | **MONARCH UTILITIES I L.P.,**         |
|   |   | a Texas limited partnership           |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   | By:                                   | Texas Water Services Group, LLC, |
|   |   |                                  | a Texas limited liability company |
|   |   |                                  | General Partner |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |                                  | By: | /s/ Michael O. Quinn |
|   |   |                                  | Name: | Michael O. Quinn |
|   |   |                                  | Title: | Vice President |
|        |        |                                       |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 22, 2013

s0319 

# Order

March 22, 2013

146490

KELLI SINTA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146490

COA: 313868

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 001604

- DC

MARTIN McDONALD,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|New Mexico--East Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|New Mexico--East Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4      | 4     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 4      | 2      | 3      | 10     | 8      | 10     | 10     | 22     | 12    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 18     | 29     | 25     | 15     | 24     | 45     | 33     | W      | 63    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 118    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60742 

Conference Calendar

 

CATHERINE M. STARR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF HATTIESBURG; ALVIN EATON; JEFFERSON

B. STEWART,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:00-CV-97-PG

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Catherine Starr appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of

her pro se complaint, which the district court liberally

construed as arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Starr sued the City

of Hattiesburg, a code enforcement officer, and a municipal

judge, alleging that her rights under the Equal Protection Clause

of the Fourteenth Amendment were violated in connection with her

prosecution and conviction for having abandoned vehicles at her
No. 01-60742

-2-

home in violation of a city ordinance. The district court

determined that the judge was absolutely immune from suit, and

that Starr had failed to overcome the defendants' summary

judgment evidence showing that she was not selectively prosecuted

for the code violation.

The district court did not err in determining that the

municipal judge who tried Starr was absolutely immune from suit. 

See Hulsey v. Owens, 63 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir. 1995)(citing

Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 745 (1982), in which the

Supreme Court granted absolute immunity to judges in the

performance of their judicial duties)).

For her remaining appellate arguments, Starr contends that

the defendants' summary-judgment evidence was fabricated, that

the district court was prejudiced and biased, and that the

judgment amounts to fraud. Starr's arguments are conclusional

and fantastic. Because Starr offered only conclusional

assertions to counter the defendants' summary-judgment evidence,

she did not meet her summary-judgment burden. See Little v.

Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc)

(nonmovant cannot satisfy summary-judgment burden with

conclusional allegations or unsubstantiated assertions).

 This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th CIR. R.

42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intelligentias, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ian W. Rice, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Thomas A. Spanier, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: April 29, 2008 | /s/ Ian W. Rice
                      Ian W. RiceChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Thomas A. Spanier
                      Thomas A. SpanierChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### CARTER v. STATE.

No. 25663.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

*263No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant waived a trial by jury and entered his plea of guilty before the court under a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area. The court found him guilty and assessed his punishment at a fine of $250.00.

The proceedings appear regular in every respect. The record is brought forward without a statement of facts or bill of exception. In the state of the record nothing is presented for review by this court. The judgment is affirmed.
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Exhibit A

To Barbara Saenz’s Declaration in Support of Motion for Default Judgment

Case 5:20-cv-00218-DAE Document 28-1 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-31 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
^4^^ee - (4-j.e£ 

/ 

ATTORNEY 

IVI 

JAN- ^ 211)0. 

HEARJMG DOCKET 

December 20, 2011 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

SOO Independence Ave, SW 

Room 924A 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: /// the Matter o/K.S. Aviation, Inc. (l/b/a Sierra Academy of Aeronautics 

FDMSNo. FAA-20n-0483 

828 STRATFORD COURT 

DEL ^AAR.CA 92014-2727 

DIRECT 858.792.1789 

FAX 858.792.1799 

MOBILE 858.401.9882 

f 

> 

c/5 

Dear Clerk: 

In connection with the above matter, please add my name to the Service List as Respondent's 

counsel, and delete Cyril Lawrence. 

Thank you. 

Ver>' trujy yours, 

Robert J. Flajek 

/dsb ..-

Offjcfs in Del Mar, Rniidio Santa Fe, La jolla, and DmoioTt'n San Die^^o