alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 24734.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1950.

No appearance for appellant.

Ralph Elliott, County Atty., of Sherman, Hal Rawlins, Asst. County Atty., of Sherman, Rayburn Nall, Asst. County Atty., of Sherman, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment on a jury’s verdict finding appellant guilty of *366selling whisky in a dry area and assessing a -fine of $600.

The procedure in this case appears regular so far as the record may be considered. The judgment overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial and notice of appeal were entered on October 22, 1949. On November 26, 1949, more than 30 days after the notice of appeal was given, appellant secured an order of the court attempting to extend the time for filing statement of facts and bills of exception to the 15th day of December, 1949. On the latter date another order was entered extending the time to December 21st. The statement of facts and bills of exception were filed on December 21, 1949.

The court had the power within 30 days from October 22d to extend the time for filing the statement of facts and bills of exception, but he had no power thereafter to extend time for filing bills of exception. His order of November 26, 1949, was without authority and, consequently, we are unable to consider the bills of exception in this case. The bill upon which appellant relies for reversal cannot be considered.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Ohio Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Ohio Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 20     | 96    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                      
|Mississippi (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                      
|Mississippi (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                                   
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### CALAHAN v. STATE.

No. 24844.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for operating an automobile upon a public highway while under *thp*mfluence of intoxicating liquor. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.00.

No notice of appeal appears in the record, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to consider the case. See Art. 827, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P., and cases cited.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 3.2(b)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       INTELLIGENT MOTOR CARS GROUP, INC.

         Intelligent Motor Cars Group, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by the unanimous
written consent of its members and filed with the minutes of the Corporation,
adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation for the Corporation:

         RESOLVED, that the Corporation shall amend its Certificate of
Incorporation, by deleting the Paragraph FOURTH in its entirety and inserting in
its place the following:

          FOURTH: The amount of the total authorized capital stock of this
                  Corporation is:

                  Common Stock: 500,000,000 shares of common stock
                  ------------
                   having $.001 par value.

                  Preferred Stock: 20,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred
                  ---------------
                  stock, $.001 par value, having such designations, preferences,
                  relative and other rights as the Board of Directors shall, in
                  its discretion, so designate

         SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of the stockholders, the
holders of the outstanding shares of common stock not having less than the
minimum number of votes which would be necessary to authorize or to take such
action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present
and voted, have given their written consent to said amendment in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 and Section 228 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Gerald Scalzo, its Chief Executive Officer and Michael Magolnick its
Assistant Secretary, this 7th day of April, 2005.


                                           Intelligent Motor Cars Group, Inc.

                                           By: /s/ Gerald Scalzo
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Gerald Scalzo, CEO
(SEAL)
ATTEST:


By: /s/ Michael Magolnick
    --------------------------------------
    Michael Magolnick, Assistant Secretary
----

Action brought on 3 May 2006 — Centro Studi A. Manieri v Council of the European Union

(Case T-125/06)

(2006/C 131/90)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant(s): Centro Studi A. Manieri (Rome, Italy) (represented by: Carlo Forte, Mario Forte and Giannicola Forte, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action has been brought against the decision of the Secretary-General of the defendant to withdraw the invitation to tender launched in the autumn of 2003 by contract notice 2003/S 209-187862 by restricted procedure for the full management of a crèche. The reason for the decision is alleged to be the acceptance of a proposal by the Office for infrastructure and logistics (OIB) of the Commission regarding the management of the crèche in question. That proposal was judged to be much more advantageous than the applicant's tender, particularly as regards the contractual conditions offered to the staff, the economies of scale and the optimisation of the available resources.

In support of its claims the applicant relies on pleas of:

----
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**List of Subsidiaries of American Seafoods Group LLC**

 

American Seafoods International LLC 

 

New Bedford Seafoods LLC 

 

The Hadley Group LLC 

 

American Seafoods Processing LLC 

 

American Seafoods Company LLC 

 

American Challenger LLC 

 

American Dynasty LLC 

 

American Triumph LLC 

 

Ocean Rover LLC 

 

Northern Eagle LLC 

 

Northern Hawk LLC 

 

Northern Jaeger LLC 

 

Katie Ann LLC 

 

American Seafoods Company JapanLtd. 

 

International Seafoods Flavors, LLC 

 

American Seafoods, Inc. 

 

Southern Pride Catfish LLC 

 

Southern Pride Catfish Trucking Inc.
#### William Witter, Appellant, v Edward J. Taggart et al., Respondents.

In an action to enforce an alleged recorded scenic easement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.), entered July 7, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The instant dispute involves neighbors, the plaintiff William Witter, and the defendants Edward J. Taggart and Rosemary Taggart, whose homes are located on a creek in East Islip. The defendants erected a dock on their premises and the plaintiff challenged this action, urging that this dock was violative of a scenic easement which provided for an unobstructed view of the creek. The Supreme Court, Suffolk County, finding no issues of fact in need of determination, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff’s contentions notwithstanding, we can discern no reason to disturb this determination.

It is a well-established rule of law in New York that in the absence of actual notice, an owner of land takes title subject to easements which may be ascertained by reference to the deed to him or a deed of record to one of his predecessors in title. Matters outside of one’s own chain of title do not constitute notice *(see, Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v Boehm Bros.,*267 NY 242). At bar, the dominant tenement (now owned by the plaintiffs) and the servient tenement (now owned by the defendants) were once held by a common owner. When the common owner subdivided the land and sold part of it to a predecessor in title of the plaintiff, he included a covenant that the land sold by him would be benefited by a scenic easement over the lands he retained. However, the covenant was not recorded in the chain of title to the servient tenement. Therefore, the defendants, the present owners of the servient tenement, acquired their land without actual *398knowledge of the easement. Since notice of this restriction cannot be imputed to the defendants *(see, Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v Boehm Bros., supra,*at 250), they are not bound by the grant of a scenic easement over the land now owned by them.

Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted, and the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

In light of our determination, we do not address the parties’ remaining contentions. Eiber, J. P., Balletta, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur. *[See,*144 Misc 2d 444.]
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25527]

[[Page 59389]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2210, MM Docket No. 00-179, RM-9947]

Digital Television Broadcast Service; Arkadelphia, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by the 
Arkansas Educational Television Commission (``AETC''), licensee of 
noncommercial educational Station KETG(TV), NTSC Channel *9, 
Arkadelphia, Arkansas. AETC requests the substitution of DTV Channel 
*13 for Station KETG(TV)'s assigned DTV Channel *46 at Arkadelphia. DTV 
Channel *13 can be allotted to Arkadelphia, Arkansas, in compliance 
with the principle community coverage requirements of section 73.625(a) 
at reference coordinates (33-54-26 N. and 93-06-46 W.). As requested, 
we propose to allot DTV Channel *13 to Arkadelphia with a power of 7.3 
and a height above average terrain (HAAT) of 320.9 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 24, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before December 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., 
Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with 
the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel 
or consultant, as follows: Todd D. Gray, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, PLLC, 
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 (counsel 
for Arkansas Educational Television Commission).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-179, adopted September 
29, 2000, and released October 2, 2000. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, 
S.W., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-25527 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

JOSE ORTIZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED, 

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

TRINIDAD DRILLING, LLC, 

TRINIDAD DRILLING, L.P.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00503-OLG

ORDER

Before the Court is the above-styled cause of action, which was referred to the 

undersigned for all pretrial proceedings. On August 28, 2020, the Court received Plaintiff’s 

Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc. [#42]. The 

filing stipulates to the dismissal of Defendant Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc. pursuant to 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The stipulation is signed by counsel for Plaintiff Jose Ortiz, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated. Defendant Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc. has a number of 

dispositive motions pending in this case. In light of the dismissal, the Court will dismiss these 

motions as moot.

The Court also notes that Plaintiff has also voluntarily dismissed Defendant Ensign 

United States Drilling, Inc. from this suit [#37]. This Defendant also has a pending motion to 

dismiss on file [#24], but the motion will not be dismissed as Defendant Trinidad Drilling LLC is 

also a party to the motion. 

Case 5:20-cv-00503-OLG-ESC Document 43 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc.’s 

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [#35] and Defendant Ensign U.S. Drilling (SW), Inc.’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment [#36] are DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00503-OLG-ESC Document 43 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2
US EPA, "Read the Label First" Interactive Pesticide Product Label

<<Put cursor on blue text for descriptions of label sections.>>

 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/kids/hometour/label/read.htm [3/2/2011 8:24:43 AM]