alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC., WHATSAPP, 

INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00267-ADA

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00269-ADA

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., 

AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, 

AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00272-ADA

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE INC.,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00275-ADA

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 38 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T 

SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, 

LLC,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00325-ADA

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A 

VERIZON WIRELESS, VERIZON 

SERVICES CORP., VERIZON 

BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES, 

INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

6:20-CV-00327-ADA

ORDER STAYING CASES

The above-entitled and numbered cases are stayed until the Northern District of 

California enters an order on the pending motions to dismiss in each of the following cases: 

• Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (5:20-cv-02397)

• Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (5:20-cv-02460)

• AT&T Corp. et al v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (5:20-cv-02995)

• Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (5:20-cv-03092)

Plaintiff is directed to inform this Court within seven days of the entry of the last order.

SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 38 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quest Group International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig Davis, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Craig Davis
----------------------------
Craig Davis
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
December 22, 2003
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4994 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear for 

men. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. BONAMICI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered 

footwear for men. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR MEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4994 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Footwear for men with uppers of leather other than 

of pigskin (other than 

work footwear, tennis 

shoes, basketball shoes, 

gym shoes, training shoes 

and the like, and other 

than slip-on footwear), covering the ankle, valued 

$27/pair or higher, designed to be worn in lieu 

of, but not over, other footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease 

or chemicals or cold or inclement weather where 

such protection includes 

protection against water 

that is imparted by the use 

of a coated or laminated 

textile fabric (provided for 

in subheading 6403.91.60) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, )

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Chair of the )

Texas Democratic Party, JOSEPH DANIEL )

CASCINO, SHANDA MARIE SANSING, )

and BRENDA LI GARCIA, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CA-438-FB

)

GREG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, )

KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, )

RUTH HUGHS, Texas Secretary of )

State, DANA DEBEAUVOIR, Travis )

County Clerk, and JACQUELYN F. )

CALLANEN, Bexar County Elections )

Administrator, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE

Before the Court is the status of the above styled and numbered cause, which has been stayed

pending further proceedings in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Docket no. 117). The Court finds this

case is appropriate for administrative closure. See Mire v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., 389 F.3d 163, 167

(5th Cir. 2014) (“District courts frequently make use of this device to remove from their pending cases

suits which are temporarily active elsewhere (such as before an arbitration panel) or stayed (such as where

a bankruptcy is pending). The effect of an administrative closure is no different from a simple stay . . . .”).

The Clerk’s office is therefore DIRECTED to administratively close this case pending further order of the

Court. Though administratively closed, this case will still exist on the docket of this Court and may be

reopened upon request or on the Court’s own motion. Parties may continue to file motions and documents

in the case.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 28th day of August, 2020.

_________________________________________________

FRED BIERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 119 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

***Certification pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C.Section 1350)***

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American States Water Company and Golden State WaterCompany (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I Robert J. Sprowls, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Robert J. Sprowls

Robert J. SprowlsSenior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

Date: May 10, 2007

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5004 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5004

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diphenyl sulfide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diphenyl sulfide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIPHENYL SULFIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to diphenyl sulfide) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5139 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5139

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain 12-volt batteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain 12-volt batteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN 12-VOLT BATTERIES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain 12-volt batteries) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### EVERMAN et al. v. WILL et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 26, 1951.

M. C. Redwine and Redwine & Redwine, all of Winchester, for appellants.

S. T. Davis, Rodney Haggard, Winchester, for appellees.

MOREMEN, Justice.

Appellants brought suit to quiet title to a strip of land, and based their claim of ownership upon a deed stated to have been executed and delivered to appellants by the Commissioner of the Circuit Court. It was not alleged that the deed was recorded. Appellees moved that the Court require appellants to file this deed. The Court sustained the motion. Appellants refused to comply with the Court’s ruling and declined to plead further. From a judgment dismissing the petition, this appeal is prosecuted.

Section 120 of the Civil Code of Practice requires that: “If an action, counterclaim, set-off or cross-petition be founded on a note, bond, bill or other writing, as evidence of indebtedness, it must be filed as a part of the pleading, * * * ”

Section 128 of the Code provides, in addition, a party may file as an exhibit any writing upon which he may intend to rely as evidence.

We held in the case of Burkhart v. Loughridge, 116 Ky. 604, 76 S.W. 397, a party may, but is not required to, file title bonds or deeds, because such instruments are only evidence of title, and do not fall under the catalogue contained in Section 120 of the Code. It is possible that a deed might contain “evidence of indebtedness,” but that question is not presented here.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to set aside the judgment as well as the order requiring appellants to file the above mentioned deed, and for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-040;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4790 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4790

To extend the suspension of duty on 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-piperidinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Ross of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the suspension of duty on 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-piperidinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-
piperidinone) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Texas - RRC District 8A Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Texas - RRC District 8A Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 655    | 14     | 28     | 13     | 49     | 250    | 5      | 6      | 6      | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 43     | 28     | 44     | 6      | 13     | 41     | 11     | 4      | 63    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 15     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 4, 2007                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| /s/William                B. Timmerman              |   |
| William                B. Timmerman                 |   |
| Chairman                of the Board, President and |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer              |   |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5096 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Benzyl-4-phenyl-4-piperidine 

carboxylic acid ethyl ester HCl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1-Benzyl-4- 

phenyl-4-piperidine carboxylic acid ethyl ester HCl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-BENZYL-4-PHENYL-4-PIPERIDINE CAR4 BOXYLIC ACID ETHYL ESTER HCL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1-Benzyl-4-phenyl-4-piperidine carboxylic acid ethyl 

ester HCl (CAS No. 

72216–57–0) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.32.50) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5096 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7343** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DALE EUGENE ELLIS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western D istrict of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00017

- RLV

- DCK

- 1; 5:11

- cv 00022

- RLV )

Submitted : February 9 , 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by u n published per curiam opinion
. Dale Eugene Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dale Eugen e Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denie s relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ellis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED