alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EERE Information Center Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Technical Support Document This page presents the chapters and appendices of the technical support document, which provides the analyses and results supporting the information presented in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) for refrigerated beverage vending machines.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader

. Title Page ( PDF 20 KB ) Acronyms and Abbreviations ( PDF 16 KB )



### Chapters Chapter 1: Introduction ( PDF 52 KB ) Chapter 2: Analytical Framework ( PDF 136 KB ) Chapter 3: Market and Technology Assessment ( PDF 316 KB ) Chapter 4: Screening Analysis ( PDF 40 KB ) Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis ( PDF 268 KB ) Chapter 6: Markups for Equipment Price Determination ( PDF 68 KB ) Chapter 7: Energy Use Characterization ( PDF 212 KB ) Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis ( PDF 312 KB ) Chapter 9: Trial Standard Levels ( PDF 48 KB ) Chapter 10: Shipments Analysis ( PDF 132 KB ) Chapter 11: National Impact Analysis ( PDF 144 KB ) Chapter 12: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group Analysis ( PDF 64 KB ) Chapter 13: Manufacturer Impact Analysis ( PDF 380 KB ) Chapter 14: Utility Impact Analysis ( PDF 208 KB ) Chapter 15: Net National Employment Impact Analysis ( PDF 40 KB ) Chapter 16: Environmental Impact Analysis ( PDF 144 KB ) Chapter 17: Regulatory Impact Analysis ( PDF 52 KB ) 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Refrigerated Beverag... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 2 5/28/2009 8:10 A M

### Appendices Appendix A: Instructions for Using the Engineering Analysis Spreadsheet ( PDF 216 KB ) Appendix B: Engineering Data ( PDF 76 KB ) Appendix C: Detailed Data for Equipment Price Markups ( PDF 36 KB ) Appendix D: Typical Meteorological Year (TMY2) Assignments ( PDF 2.7 MB) Appendix E: User Instruction for Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( PDF 44 KB ) Appendix F: Detailed Life-Cycle Cost Output ( PDF 3.1 MB ) Appendix G: User Instructions for NIA Spreadsheets ( PDF 52 KB ) Appendix H: Detailed National Energy Savings and National Net Present Value Output ( PDF 316 KB ) Appendix I: Estimation of Marginal Heat Rates and Site to Source Conversion Factors ( PDF 172 KB ) Appendix J: Manufacturer Impact Analysis Interview Guide and Government Regulatory Input Model ( PDF 248 KB ) Appendix K: Estimation of Utility and Environmental Results from NEMS-BT Output ( PDF 88 KB )

Contact Information Charles Llenza Project Manager (202) 586-2192

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home| EERE Home| U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies| Security & Privacy| USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 05/21/2009 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Refrigerated Beverag... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

2 of 2 5/28/2009 8:10 A M
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 5

- 00211

- CV
OMONIEFE MARY BAZUNU , Appellant

V.
MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SY STEMS, INC. , Appellee Appeal from the 127 th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 46325 )
Appellant, Omoniefe Mary Bazunu , has neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, all the required fees. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, app ellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED , ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court orders that the appellant, Omoniefe Mary Bazunu , pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified bel ow for observance.
Judgment rendered May 28, 2015

. Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
SCE Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  $10,497,805
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  2,290,549
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,099,053
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,760,313
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,647,720
<COMMON>                                     2,168,054
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      393,164
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,408,330
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,969,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          275,000
<PREFERRED>                                    183,755
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,385,929
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                    3,421,556
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 428,315
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  567,875
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               6,415,742
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               17,647,720
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,622,691
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           125,604
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,269,119
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,394,723
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        227,968
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              17,502
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 245,470
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       140,324
<NET-INCOME>                                   105,146
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      6,759
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   98,387
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        95,564
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      116,133
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         406,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BARNETTE v. STATE.

No. 24247.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1949.

*21Charles E. Heidingsfelder, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Criminal Dist.Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $250.

The information charged an assault by a male person upon a female.

The testimony of the prosecutrix, a married woman, shows that appellant gained admission to her home by representing himself to be a “light inspector.”

Prosecutrix was ill and in bed. Appellant made improper advances, exposed his privates, and took hold of prosecutrix and twisted her arm. Prior to that, appellant ■had reached under the bed covers and had placed his hand upon the chest and stomach of prosecutrix.

All these acts and conduct on the part of appellant were against the will and over the protestations of the prosecutrix. The threat of prosecutrix to call for help was the cause of his leaving.

Appellant insists that the facts are insufficient to support the conviction.

The act of appellant in taking hold of and twisting the arm of prosecu-trix, together with his insulting conduct and his feeling of her breast and stomach, constituted an assault and battery. Poldrack v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 272, 216 S.W. 170. An assault or assault and battery by an adult male upon the person of a female is an aggravated assault.

The facts support the verdict.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied the alleged acts of misconduct. He accounted for his presence in the house by saying that he was an electrical repairman and was soliciting odd jobs of that character.

Appellant claims that a new trial should have been awarded because of newly discovered evidence. The motion is clearly inadequate to present the question, for there is an utter absence of any allegation therein that appellant’s counsel did not know of the claimed newly discovered testimony prior to the trial. Mims v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 647, 146 S.W.2d 754. Moreover, the testimony heard upon the motion for new trial abundantly shows that, by the exercise of the least diligence, appellant or his attorney could have discovered the testimony of the witnesses, prior to the trial.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 12(a)

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary
Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                         |  |                             |   |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                         |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  
|Millions of Dollars, Except for
Ratios                   |  | 2006                        |   |  | 2005 |  
|Earnings:                                                |  |                             |   |  |      |  
|Net income                                               |  | $379                        |   |  | $237 |  
|Equity earnings net of
distributions                     |  | (15                         | ) |  | (9   | )
|Total earnings                                           |  | 364                         |   |  | 228  |  
|Income taxes                                             |  | 234                         |   |  | 137  |  
|Fixed charges:                                           |  |                             |   |  |      |  
|Interest expense including amortization of debt
discount |  | 125                         |   |  | 122  |  
|Portion of rentals representing an
interest factor       |  | 59                          |   |  | 51   |  
|Total fixed charges                                      |  | 184                         |   |  | 173  |  
|Earnings available for fixed
charges                     |  | $782                        |   |  | $538 |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges                       |  | 4.3                         |   |  | 3.1  |
----

Action brought on 13 April 2006 — Oakley v OHIM

(Case T-116/06)

(2006/C 154/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Oakley, Inc. (Foothill Ranch, USA) (represented by: Michaela Huth-Dierig, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Venticinque Ltd (Hailsham, United Kingdom)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘O STORE’ for services in class 35 — Community trade mark No 2 074 599

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Venticinque Limited

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The earlier national word mark ‘THE O STORE’ for goods and services in classes 18 and 25

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of both the applicant's and Venticinque Ltd's appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the goods and services are absolutely dissimilar and there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks since the distinctive character of the earlier mark ‘THE O STORE’ is very limited. Furthermore, proof has not been provided that ‘THE O STORE’ is in any way known or well established in the French market.

----
#### RAY v. STATE.

No. 26942.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*551GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor’ law in Smith County. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.

The -record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. • All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is af-. firmed.
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTHTRUST CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,074,672
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,652
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                86,891
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               312,146
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,102,715
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,001,531
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,926,445
<LOANS>                                     30,613,993
<ALLOWANCE>                                    434,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,474,243
<DEPOSITS>                                  27,497,179
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,815,849
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            659,204
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,125,511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       422,830
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,462,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              42,474,243
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,740,759
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              375,419
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,116,178
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             694,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,107,137
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,009,041
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  104,895
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 386
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                750,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                485,306
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     327,267
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   327,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.83
<LOANS-NON>                                    108,639
<LOANS-PAST>                                    72,504
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   566
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 46,795
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               377,525
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   68,352
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,868
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              434,771
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           434,771
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4921 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4921

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Tertiobutyl catechol flakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Tertiobutyl catechol flakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERTIOBUTYL CATECHOL FLAKES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Tertiobutyl         Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          catechol flakes                                                   12/31/2015
                          or tertiobutyl
                          catechol with 85%
                          water or methanol
                          (CAS No. 98-29-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2907.29.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX, INC.,

Plaintiff / Counterclaim 

Defendant, 

v. 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant / Counterclaim 

Plaintiff.

 

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

 

 (Lead Case)

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff.

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant. 

 

 Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00758-ADA

 

NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO SERVE REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS

Motion Offense, LLC (“Motion Offense”) hereby notifies the Court of its agreement with 

Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) (collectively, the “parties”) to extend the deadline to serve rebuttal 

expert reports. The current deadline to serve the rebuttal expert reports is January 10, 2023. The 

Parties have agreed to a three-day extension, such that the new deadline to serve rebuttal expert 

reports is January 13, 2023. All other deadlines will remain in effect. 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 183 Filed 01/10/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

Dated: January 10, 2023 DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC

/s/ Derek Dahlgren

Timothy Devlin (No. 4241) 

Derek Dahlgren (pro hac vice) 

Alex Chan (Texas Bar No. 24108051) 

Cory Edwards (pro hac vice) 

1526 Gilpin Avenue

Wilmington, DE 19806 

(302) 449-9010 

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com 

ddahlgren@devlinlawfirm.com 

achan@devlinlawfirm.com 

cedwards@devlinlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Motion Offense, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has 

been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on January 10, 2023. 

/s/ Derek Dahlgren _

Derek Dahlgren

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 183 Filed 01/10/23 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           November 10, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern
Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.