alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(a)

Household Finance Corporation
Household Automotive Trust 2002-1
---------------------------------

Original Principal Class A
   Class A-1                              229,000,000
   Class A-2                              267,000,000
   Class A-3                              286,000,000
   Class A-4                              218,000,000
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)
   Class A-1                                  229,000
   Class A-2                                  267,000
   Class A-3                                  286,000
   Class A-4                                  218,000


Distribution Date                                                   2002 Totals
Days

CLASS A
Class A-1 Principal Distribution                                  202,289,840.52
Class A-1 Interest Distribution                                     1,447,618.01

Class A-2 Principal Distribution                                            0.00
Class A-2 Interest Distribution                                     4,038,375.00

Class A-3 Principal Distribution                                            0.00
Class A-3 Interest Distribution                                     5,898,750.00

Class A-4 Principal Distribution                                            0.00
Class A-4 Interest Distribution                                     5,263,610.02
'•'' ^'M^^'^fomm 

SERVED MARCH 2, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TREVOR MILLER 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2009-0735 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

In the interest of judicial efficiency, the above-captioned proceeding is reassigned from 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie A. Yoder to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. 

Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be 

served on Judge Goodwin, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached 

Service List. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A/Voder 

Chief Administrative Lx^ Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Trevor Miller, Respondent 

2319 Sundance Drive 

O'Fallon, MO 63368 

TEL: 314-497-3602 

Yolanda A. Bernal, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Case 3:20-cv-00124-DB Document 12 Filed 06/16/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:20-cv-00124-DB Document 12 Filed 06/16/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:20-cv-00124-DB Document 12 Filed 06/16/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:20-cv-00124-DB Document 12 Filed 06/16/20 Page 4 of 4
----

----

I Mitteilungen

Kommission

----

GEMEINSAMER SORTENKATALOG FÜR LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHE PFLANZENARTEN

3. Ergänzung zur 24. Gesamtausgabe

(2004/C 146 A/01)

INHALT

Erläuterungen

Liste der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenarten

I.   Betarüben

II.   Futterpflanzen

III.   Öl- und Faserpflanzen

IV.   Getreide

V.   Kartoffeln/Erdäpfel

----

ERLÄUTERUNGEN

----

(1)ABl. C 68 A vom 21.3.2006, S. 1. Sortenkatalog zuletzt geändert durch die 2. Ergänzung (ABl. C 93 A vom 21.4.2006, S. 1).

(2)ABl. L 193 vom 20.7.2002, S. 1. Richtlinie zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1829/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates (ABl. L 268 vom 18.10.2003, S. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

7.ALOPECURUS PRATENSIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

52.PHACELIA TANACETIFOLIA BENTH.

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

61.CARUM CARVI L.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARIO RUIZ

, Appellant,

v.

NANCY RUIZ

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1358

[ June 12, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Lauren M. Alperstein , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE18

- 000560

.

Rafael J. Oropesa of Rafael J. Oropesa, Attorney at Law, PA, Hialeah,

for appellant.

Catherine L. Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Elbaum v. Elbaum , 141 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-04129] 

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on August 28, 2000, on behalf of workers at Imaging Technologies Inc., Cookeville, Tennessee.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 26th day of September, 2000. 

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-25608  Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.12.2

                             [LETTERHEAD] PAREXEL

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Barry Philpott
Golden Glades
Great Bois Wood
Chesam Bois
Amersham
BUCKS HP6 5NJ

15th November 2000

Dear Barry:

This letter serves to confirm our discussions earlier this year regarding the
change in your role and additional amendments to your terms and conditions.

Your appointment as President, Contract Research Services became effective on
1st April 2000. As you are aware the salary and MIP increases associated with
your role change have already been implemented.

We also discussed changes in your notice period and I have set these out below.

I can confirm that the Company will give 12 months' prior written notice of its
intention to terminate your employment for any reason whatsoever, except in the
circumstance of gross misconduct. In the event that you wish to terminate your
employment you are required to give 12 months' written notice of your intention
so to do.

In the event that the Company serves notice to terminate your employment, then
the Company may at its absolute discretion require you not to attend work or not
to undertake all your duties during all or part of your notice period, provided
always that the Company shall continue to pay your salary and contractual
benefits and/or make a payment in lieu of notice. For the avoidance of doubt
this payment would include the value of any benefits including your target
payment under the MIP scheme, or holiday entitlement which would have accrued
had you been employed to the end of the notice period.

Again, for the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Change Control
Agreement remain unaltered.

It has come to my attention that you have not signed a Key Employee Agreement.
As you know this is a requirement of all senior employees of the Company and it
is attached for
<PAGE>

your review and signature. Please return a signed copy to Julia Ronde in the UK
HR department.

I wish to thank you for your valued contribution and look forward to continuing
our long and rewarding association.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Josef H. von Rickenbach

Josef H. von Rickenbach
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
-----------------------------------------------

Encl: Key Employee Agreement
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5038 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chocolate confectionery products filled 

with caramel or sugar-based paste imported in bulk quantities but ready 

for consumption in their condition as imported. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. DENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chocolate confectionery 

products filled with caramel or sugar-based paste imported in bulk quantities but ready for consumption in 

their condition as imported. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5038 IH

1 SECTION 1. CHOCOLATE CONFECTIONERY PRODUCTS 

2 FILLED WITH CARAMEL OR SUGAR-BASED 

3 PASTE IMPORTED IN BULK QUANTITIES BUT 

4 READY FOR CONSUMPTION IN THEIR CONDI5 TION AS IMPORTED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Chocolate confectionery 

products filled with caramel or sugar-based paste 

imported in bulk quantities 

but ready for consumption 

in their condition as imported (provided for in 

subheading 1806.90.59) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7078

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CALVIN FONVILLE, a/k/a Cal,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RBS-3)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Fonville, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Fonville appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Fonville, No. 2:95-cr-00049-RBS-3 (E.D. Va. July 1, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/27/2010 01:48 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |07/27/2010 01:42 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |draft GACT memo | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Draft memo attached. (See attached file: SI RICE NESHAP Area Source Analysis 7-27-10.doc) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5063 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5063

 To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments and dyes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments and dyes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND DYES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain organic pigments and 
dyes) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60742 Conference Calendar

CATHERINE M. STARR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF HATTIESBURG; ALVIN EATON; JEFFERSON B. STEWART, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:00-CV-97-PG

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Catherine Starr appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of her pro se complaint, which the district court liberally construed as arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Starr sued the City of Hattiesburg, a code enforcement officer, and a municipal judge, alleging that her rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were violated in connection with her prosecution and conviction for having abandoned vehicles at herNo. 01-60742 -2- home in violation of a city ordinance. The district court determined that the judge was absolutely immune from suit, and that Starr had failed to overcome the defendants' summary judgment evidence showing that she was not selectively prosecuted for the code violation. The district court did not err in determining that the municipal judge who tried Starr was absolutely immune from suit.
See Hulsey v. Owens , 63 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir. 1995)(citing Nixon v. Fitzgerald , 457 U.S. 731, 745 (1982), in which the Supreme Court granted absolute immunity to judges in the performance of their judicial duties)). For her remaining appellate arguments, Starr contends that the defendants' summary-judgment evidence was fabricated, that the district court was prejudiced and biased, and that the judgment amounts to fraud. Starr's arguments are conclusional and fantastic. Because Starr offered only conclusional assertions to counter the defendants' summary-judgment evidence, she did not meet her summary-judgment burden. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc) (nonmovant cannot satisfy summary-judgment burden with conclusional allegations or unsubstantiated assertions). This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th C IR . R. 42.2.
# E C 

# / R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 25 0  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2751 4

Telephone: (919)484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 MEMORANDUM

Date: August 16 , 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Denise Grubert, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the August 6 , 2010 EPA S ite V isit to Ultra Resources in

Pinedale, Wyoming

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this site v isit was to visit Ultra Resources in Pinedale, Wyoming on

August 6, 2010.

II. LOCATION & DATE

The facility was located in the town of Pinedale, Wyoming . The site visit took place on

August 6, 2010

.

III. ATTENDEES

Ultra Resources

Belinda Salinas

Sam McClu re

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rachel Agnew

Jodi Howard

Bruce Moore

Greg Nizich

Nick ParsonsEC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Denise Grubert

Karen Marsh

Wyoming Department of Environment

Jennifer Frazier

Cynthia Madison

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and

pending approval by the facility, a non

- confidential report has not been issued.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Nichols, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Kidnapping in the first degree under Penal Law § 135.25 (3) is a strict liability crime with respect to the death caused, because it does not require an intent to bring about the death of the victim *(see, People v Campbell,*72 NY2d 602, 604-605). Consequently, there can be no attempt to commit that crime *(see, People v Esquilin,*159 AD2d 632, *Iv denied*76 NY2d 734), and defendant’s convictions for attempted kidnapping in the first degree and felony murder where the underlying felony was attempted kidnapping must be reversed, and those counts of the indictment dismissed.

We have examined the remaining issues raised by defendant and find them lacking in merit. We decline to modify the sentence in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Wayne County Court, Parenti, J.—murder, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SPECTRUM
CONTROL, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT AUGUST 31, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31,
1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8928
<ALLOWANCES>                                       396
<INVENTORY>                                      12429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 22073
<PP&E>                                           40908
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   38813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6525
<BONDS>                                           3777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13952
<OTHER-SE>                                       14152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     38813
<SALES>                                          41058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 41058
<CGS>                                            28506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    28506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3681
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>