alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BATES v. STATE.

No. 25065.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1951.

Thomas & Thomas, Big Spring, 'for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Under an indictment charging assault with intent to murder with malice, appellant was convicted of assault with intent - to murder without malice, with punishment assessed at one year and one day in the penitentiary.

A statement of the facts is not deemed called for. It is sufficient to say that the testimony raised the issue of self-defense. The trial court so recognized, and applied that defense by the following charge: “Now if you believe that the defendant committed an assault as a means of self-defense, believing- at the time that he was in danger of losing his 'life or of serious bodily injury, at the hands of Anderson Davis, Jr. then you will acquit the defendant of any and all offenses and say by your verdict, not guilty.”

It is apparent that this charge does not submit the doctrine of reasonable doubt in-connection with self-defense and, in not so-doing, is erroneous. 22 Tex.Jur., Homicide,. Sec. 281, p. 1014; Milam v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 85, 3 S.W.2d 97; Thompson v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 351, 288 S.W. 464 Castle v. State, 84 Tex.Cr.R. 593, 209 S.W. 416.

Appellant reserved a proper exception to> the charge for the error mentioned.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5041 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5041

 To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of formaldehyde polymers 
             with aniline and with 4.4'-methylendianiline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

   Mr. Dent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of formaldehyde polymers 
             with aniline and with 4.4'-methylendianiline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FORMALDEHYDE POLYMERS WITH ANILINE AND WITH 
              4.4'-METHYLENDIANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.18 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of formaldehyde 
polymers with aniline and with 4.4'-methylendianiline) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-3 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February
      28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer
      and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.











Date:
      April 10, 2006





GORDON
      BROOKE


B.
      Gordon
      Brooke


Chief
      Accounting Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Director








-1-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

419 

CA 11-01671 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN FAGER, THOMAS GILLETT 

AND OTHER PETITIONERS UNITED IN INTEREST, 

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, 

V ORDER

BOARD OF EDUCATION, ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

 

RICHARD E. CASAGRANDE, LATHAM (JAMES D. BILIK OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. 

CHARLES G. JOHNSON, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL E. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David

Michael Barry, J.), entered November 1, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant

to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied and dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT  99.1            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                SECTION 301 (A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  E.  Del  Thachuk,  certify  that:


1.   I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSBA of Standard Capital
     Corporation  ("Standard");


2.   Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  quarterly  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all
     material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows  of  Standard as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report;

4.   Standard's  other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
     and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
     Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  Standard  and  have  :

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure that
          material  information  relating  to  Standard  is  made known to us by
          others  within  it,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which this
          quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Standard's  disclosure controls and
          procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this  quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  date");  and

     (c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
          effectiveness  of  the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation  as  of  the  Evaluation  date;

5.   Standard's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
     recent  evaluation,  to  Standard's  auditors  and  Standard's  board  of
     directors:

     (a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which  could  adversely affect Standard's ability to record,
          process,  summarize  and report financial data and have identified for
          Standard's  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls, and

     (b)  Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in Standard's internal controls;
          and

6.   Standard's  other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
     report  whether  there  were significant changes in internal controls or in
     other  factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
     to  the date of our most recent evaluation including any corrective actions
     with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.


Date  April 19, 2004

/s/  "E.  Del  Thachuk"
------------------------------------
      E.  Del  Thachuk
Chief  Executive  Officer,
  President  and  Director
Exhibit 99(c)

 

 

 

	Certificate as to Compliance
 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 15, 2002 among Household Automotive Trust 2002-1, as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables Corporation, as Seller, the Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee (the "Master Sale and Servicing Agreement"), that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through December 31, 2003 (the "Year") and of its performance under the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

	2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 25th day of March, 2004.

					

						/s/ Steven H. Smith		
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer

 

 

AUTO 2002-1
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -3     | 14     | -292  
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -269   | 389    | 82     | 69     | -192   | 288    | -239   | 239    | -125   | 250   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | -83    | -123   | 184    | 102    | 175    | -287   | 339    | 69     | -265   | -152  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 84     | 60     | 210    | 149    | 24     | 88     | 89     | 79     | -6     | 224   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 140    | 125    | -236   | -20    | 94     | 396    | -213   | 33     | 14     | -35   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 48     | 262    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
By letter of January 13, 2000, petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and North American Free Trade Agreement, Transitional Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notices were signed on November 15, 1999. The notice for TA-W-37,000 was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 28, 1999 (64 FR 72691). The notice for NAFTA-3402 will soon be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The petitioners present information regarding company imports of chocolate products and related ingredients and a shift in production of certain articles from Jersey City, New Jersey to Canada.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of January 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-2497 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Melvin LAWSON v. STATE.

No. 23198.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1945.

Ross Hardin, H. R. Bishop, and Levi Pressly, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of the offense of maiming, and his punishment assessed at four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

We find incorporated in the transcript appellant’s application, duly verified, asking that the appeal be withdrawn, which request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERINSTON LORIEN SPENCER, AKA 

Llewelyn Cole, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-73095 

Agency No. A028-445-915 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Berinston Lorien Spencer, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying relief under the Convention 

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-73095 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Sanjaa v. Sessions, 

863 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir. 2017). We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying Spencer’s deferral of removal under CAT claim, it is unclear 

from the record whether the agency considered the risk of torture by actors other 

than the individuals who previously attacked Spencer, where Spencer testified that 

he will be tortured or killed by anyone who learns of his sexual orientation in 

Jamaica, including the police, and where there is potentially dispositive record 

evidence supporting Spencer’s testimony. See Cole v. Holder, 659 F.3d 762, 772 

(9th Cir. 2011) (“[W]here potentially dispositive testimony and documentary 

evidence is submitted, the BIA must give reasoned consideration to that 

evidence.”); Bromfield v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1071, 1078 (9th Cir. 2008) (in 

evaluating a CAT claim, “the agency must consider ‘all evidence relevant to the 

possibility of future torture,’ including the Country Report, which establishes that 

gay men are victims of beatings, killings, and other forms of torture.” (citation 

omitted)); see also Madrigal v. Holder, 716 F.3d 499, 509 (9th Cir. 2013) 

(remanding for agency to consider all evidence in assessing likelihood of torture). 

Thus, we grant the petition for review and remand Spencer’s CAT claim to the 

agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. 
3 18-73095 

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

We do not reach Spencer’s remaining contentions. See Recinos De Leon v. 

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir. 2005) (“We may affirm the [agency] only 

on grounds set forth in the opinion under review.”).

The government shall bear the costs for this petition for review. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5057 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5057

   To extend the suspension of duty on 5-Chloro-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-
                             naphthanilide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the suspension of duty on 5-Chloro-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-
                             naphthanilide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-CHLORO-3-HYDROXY-2-METHYL-2-NAPHTHANILIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Chloro-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-
2-naphthanilide) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                          
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Texas State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5229 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5229

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Diisocyanato-hexane homopolymer, 
        polyethylene-polypropylene glycol mono-Bu ether blocked.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Diisocyanato-hexane homopolymer, 
        polyethylene-polypropylene glycol mono-Bu ether blocked.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,6-DIISOCYANATO-HEXANE HOMOPOLYMER, POLYETHYLENE-
              POLYPROPYLENE GLYCOL MONO-BU ETHER BLOCKED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         1,6-Diisocyanato-  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          hexane                                                            12/31/2015
                          homopolymer,
                          polyethylene-
                          polypropylene
                          glycol mono-Bu
                          ether blocked
                          (CAS No. 125252-
                          47-3) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Elmer Leon OWEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 26773.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of robbery, the penalty being assessed at 25 years.

Appellant has filed properly executed affidavit requesting that this appeal be dismissed. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.