alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4906 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4906

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Uvinul 3039.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

    Mr. Clarke of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Uvinul 3039.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UVINUL 3039.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-Ethylhexyl-2-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          cyano-3,3-                                                        12/31/2015
                          diphenylacrylate
                          (CAS No. 6197-30-
                          4) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2926.90.48)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### GOREE v. STATE.

No. 26122.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and the punishment is assessed at a fine of $150 *127and confinement in the county jail for 60 days.

All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form. The. record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CYOP Systems International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitch White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Mitch White

Mitch White
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, October 13, 2000.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for more Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Sectretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-24872 Filed 9-33-00; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4774 

To extend the suspension of duty on Paraquat dichloride (1,1’-dimethyl4,4’-bipyridinium dichloride). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Paraquat dichloride 

(1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium dichloride). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE (1,1’-DIMETHYL-4,4’- 

4 BIPYRIDINIUM DICHLORIDE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.06 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Paraquat dichloride (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium di8 chloride)) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

9 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4774 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LAMONT E. MCCORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00387-REP-2)

Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont E. McCord, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6092 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lamont E. McCord seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

appoint counsel and to file a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his 

motion for a reduction in sentence and granting his motion for an extension of time to file 

a supplement to his motion for compassionate release. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 

541, 545-46 (1949). Because McCord’s motion for compassionate release is still pending 

in the district court, the order McCord seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant McCord’s motion to 

seal his informal brief, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6092 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of ***

International Trade, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CUMBRE, INC.; COACHELLA

VALLEY INSURANCE SERVICE, INC.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE

FUND,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-17190

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-02706-CW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Claudia A. Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HALL and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.*** 

FILED

NOV 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

The district court correctly concluded that claim preclusion bars the claims

brought by Cumbre, Inc. and Coachella Valley Ins. Co. (collectively, “Cumbre”). 

Claim preclusion “bars any subsequent suit on claims that were raised or could

have been raised in a prior action.” Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.,

586 F.3d 1204, 1212 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Cumbre’s present suit alleges the same primary right violation that Cumbre

alleged in state court. The final decision by the California Court of Appeals

conclusively rejecting that claim is res judicata as to the identical federal claim

asserted in this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262,

1268 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, federal courts are required to give

state court judgments the preclusive effects they would be given by another court

of that state.”).

Cumbre argues for application of Furey v. City of Sacramento, 780 F.2d

1448 (9th Cir. 1986), abrogated on other grounds as recognized by Schnuck v. City

of Santa Monica, 935 F.2d 171, 173 (9th Cir. 1991), but that reliance is misplaced. 

Under California law, the issuance of a remittitur by the court of appeal indicates

that the state appellate process has been concluded. Kay v. City of Rancho Palos

Verdes, 504 F.3d 803, 808 (9th Cir. 2007). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF MARY H.

HENDERSON

PETITION OF: ARNIE STEINBERG :

:

:

:

: No. 23 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

State of South Carolina, Petitioner,

v.

Kadelle Childers, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000617

IN THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Memorandum Opinion No. 2019-MO-001

Heard December 12, 2018 – Filed January 4, 2019

VACATED

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Deputy Attorney General 

Donald J. Zelenka, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney 

General J. Benjamin Aplin, Solicitor General Robert D. 

Cook, and Deputy Solicitor General J. Emory Smith, Jr., 

all of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Public Defender Ashley Pennington and Assistant Public 

Defender Benjamin A. Mack, both of Charleston, for 

Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: We accepted this matter in our original jurisdiction to determine 

whether extraordinary relief was necessary to prevent conducting post-indictment 
preliminary hearings in the Ninth Judicial Circuit. We vacate the circuit court's order 

and enjoin the Charleston County magistrates from holding post-indictment 

preliminary hearings in other matters pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the 

following authorities: 

Rule 2(b), SCRCrimP ("If the defendant requests a preliminary hearing, the hearing 

shall be held within ten days following the request. The hearing shall not be held, 

however, if the defendant is indicted by a grand jury or waives indictment before the 

preliminary hearing is held.") (emphasis added); June 12, 2017, Ninth Judicial 

Circuit Amended Administrative Order, Section (E)(3) ("In accordance with South 

Carolina law, no Preliminary Hearings will be held on indicted cases."); State v. 

Keenan, 278 S.C. 361, 366–67, 296 S.E.2d 676, 678–79 (1982) (holding Section 22-

5-320 of the South Carolina Code, which provided a defendant the right to a 

preliminary hearing if demanded before an indictment, unconstitutional); State v. 

Ballington, 346 S.C. 262, 269, 551 S.E.2d 280, 283 (Ct. App. 2001) (recognizing a 

circuit court cannot "restore the right to a preliminary hearing by ordering a postindictment preliminary hearing"), overruled on other grounds by State v. Belcher, 

385 S.C. 597, 685 S.E.2d 802 (2009). 

 

VACATED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

_______________________________________

_

IKORONGO TEXAS LLC and

IKORONGO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs, 

 vs.

LG ELECTRONICS INC., and

LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

_

IKORONGO TEXAS LLC and

IKORONGO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

LYFT, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________

_

IKORONGO TEXAS LLC and

IKORONGO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00257-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00258-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00259-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Page 1

Case 6:20-cv-00259-ADA Document 55-3 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
DECLARATION OF MICHAEL W. MITCHELL 

I, Michael W. Mitchell, declare as follows:

1. If called to testify, I would and could competently testify to the following facts which are 

within my personal knowledge.

2. I am a named inventor of U.S. Patents RE41,450; RE45,543 and RE47,704. I understand that 

these patents are asserted by Ikorongo in the above-captioned lawsuits.

3. I have agreed to provide consulting services to Ikorongo in connection with the abovecaptioned lawsuits. I am being compensated for my time and expenses, and am willing to 

travel to Waco, Texas for trial or otherwise should it become necessary. This travel will not 

inconvenience me. I understand that trial in these matters is currently scheduled to begin 

January 24, 2022.

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America and California, 

that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the date noted below in ________________. 

Dated: December 30, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

___________________________

MICHAEL W. MITCHELL

Page 2

Case 6:20-cv-00259-ADA Document 55-3 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 850    | 1,599  | 1,910 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 863    | 789    | 711    | 581    | 781    | 1,366  | 2,049  | 1,123  | 5,421  | 1,189 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,171  | 1,984  | 1,757  | 2,000  | 801    | 1,267  | 1,074  | 2,459  | 2,040  | 1,882 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,748  | 1,599  | 2,262  | 1,547  | 2,757  | 2,071  | 1,273  | 2,534  | 2,735  | 1,396 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,211  | 2,114  | 2,384  | 3,407  | 3,394  | 1,394  | 4,443  | 1,479  | 1,722  | 1,076 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,055  | 5,285  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 508 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 508

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the child 
 tax credit and to allow for adjustments for inflation with respect to 
                         the child tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

 Mr. Posey (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Young of 
  Alaska, Mrs. Blackburn, and Mr. Bartlett) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the child 
 tax credit and to allow for adjustments for inflation with respect to 
                         the child tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Tax Credit Preservation Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Repeal of Sunset.--Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax 
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (relating to sunset of provisions of 
such Act) shall not apply to--
            (1) the amendments made by section 201 of such Act, and
            (2) any amendments made to section 24 of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 which are enacted after the date of the 
        enactment of such Act.
    (b) Adjustments for Inflation.--Section 24 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to the child tax credit) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Adjustments for Inflation.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a taxable year beginning 
        after December 31, 2010, the dollar amounts in subsection (a) 
        and (b)(2) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2001' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding rule.--If a dollar amount in subsection (a) 
        or (b)(2), as increased under paragraph (1), is not a multiple 
        of $50, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of 
        $50.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```