alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          
|Louisiana State Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                          
|Louisiana State Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 83     | 164    | 17     | 81     | 58     | 22     | 25     | 52     | 5      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 23     | 144    | 0      | 0      | 3      | 4      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

KAJEET, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIGHTSPEED SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-203-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff, KAJEET, INC.

(“Kajeet”) and Defendant LIGHTSPEED SOLUTIONS, LLC (“Lightspeed”), in which the 

parties request a dismissal of all claims and counterclaims by and between Kajeet and Lightspeed 

with prejudice. 

It is ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Kajeet against Lightspeed and by 

Lightspeed against Kajeet are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to 

bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.

SIGNED this ________ day of ____________, 2020.

_________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3rd December

Case 6:20-cv-00203-ADA Document 40 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 949    | 667    |        |        |        | 79     | 177    | 601    | 222   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 203    | 123    | 127    | 139    | 257    | 268    | 516    | 373    | 249    | 92    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 303    | 603    | 84     | 195    | 264    | 138    | 80     | 78     | 472    | 476   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 519    | 69     | 58     | 5      | 30     | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                       
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                       
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 91     | 97     | 110    | 294    | 300    | 349    | 387    | 411   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 468    | 443    | 407    | 262    | 292    | 248    | 291    | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6574
ROBERT JOSEPH KING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus M. RICHARD FRAGALA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA02-2482) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 25, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Joseph King, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Alice Denise Ike, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Joseph King seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that King has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny King’s motion to stay the district court’s proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4896 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work boots for women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work boots for 

women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK BOOTS FOR WOMEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4896 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for women 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers 

of leather, incorporating a 

protective toe-cap of materials other than metal, covering the ankle to a height 

greater than 15.24 cm (6 

inches) (provided for in 

subheading 6403.91.90) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,480-01

EX PARTE LAWRENCE ANTHONY KOSS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W13-41780-S(A) IN THE 282ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,

among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all

depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the

court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). The record

forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. The supplemental record after the

second remand and habeas hearing does not contain new findings of fact and conclusions of law

from the trial, as required by this Court’s second remand order.
2

The district clerk shall either forward to this Court the trial court’s findings of fact and

conclusions of law after the second remand, or certify in writing that this document is not part of the

record. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: June 16, 2021

Do not publish
#### BASS v. STATE.

No. 24404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

H. P. Kucera, City Attorney, R. A. Mc-Bean and W. K. Chapman, Asst. City Attorneys, all of Dallas, Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The record before us reflects that appel-lánt was. charged by complaint in the Corporation Court of the City of Dallas with being a vagrant. From a judgment of conviction in said court, he appealed to the county court where upon a trial in that court he was found guilty and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100. From said judgment, he has appealed to this court.

The City Attorney of the City of Dallas has filed a motion in this court requesting that the appeal be dismissed, because the judgment in this case is final since the fine imposed is not in excess of $100. The statute provides that in all cases appealed from an inferior court to the county court where the fine imposed by said latter court does not exceed $100, the judgment is final and no appeal lies. See Grigsby v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 183 S.W. 143; Foard v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 330, 185 S.W. 570; and Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Art. 53 (formerly Art. 87) where many authorities are cited under Note 2.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24663]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPALACHIAN STATES LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE COMMISSION


Annual Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m.-12 p.m. October 25, 2000.

Place: Harrisburg Hilton and Towers, One North Second Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17101.

Status: Most of the meeting will be open to the public. If there is a 
need for an executive session (closed to the public), it will be held 
at about 9 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Matters To Be Considered:
    Portions Open to the Public: The primary purpose of this meeting is 
to (1) Review the independent auditors' report of Commission's 
financial statements for fiscal year 1999-2000; (2) Review the 
Commission's annual reports for fiscal years 1999-2000; (3) Consider a 
proposed budget for fiscal year 2001-2002; (4) Review and discuss the 
recent developments in South Carolina related to the Barnwell disposal 
facility; (5) Review information on LLRW generation within the compact; 
and (6) Elect the Commission's officers.
    Portions Closed to the Public: Executive Session, if deemed 
necessary, will be held at about 9 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Contact Person for More Information: Richard R. Janati, Chairman Seif's 
Staff member on the Commission, at 717-787-2163.

Richard R. Janati,
Chairman's Staff Member on the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-24663 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0000-00-M
EXHIBIT A

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 3 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 4 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 5 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 6 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 7 of 12
Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 8 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 9 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 10 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 11 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00258-ADA Document 57-4 Filed 01/05/21 Page 12 of 12
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                    
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
GOVERNMENT REGULATORY IMPACT MODEL (GRIM)

TRAINING SESSION

DATE: July 30, 1998

LOCATION: Arthur D. Little, Inc.

(Conference Rooms A & B)

AGENDA

1. Status Update (DOE)

* Supplemental Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR):

> Tentative Publication: August 1998

> Currently being reviewed by OCS Director, General Counsel and Policy

* Workshop (contingent on publishing ANOPR in August):

> Tentative for September 22-23

* September 22 (1/2 day optional)

- GRIM training session

* September 23 (full day)

- Comments on ANOPR

- GRIM inputs/outputs

- Approach for Manufacturer Impact Analysis

- Discussion of Utility and Environmental Impact Analysis

* NOPR: March 1999

* Final Rule: October 1999

* Consumer Research

> Focus Groups

> Conjoint Analysis

> Status:

* Drafting Federal Register Notice

* Issuing competitive contract

2. GRIM Industry Cash Flow Analyses (ADL)

* Discussion of financial inputs

* Discussion of modifications to GRIM

* Training session

3. Approach for Manufacturer Impact Analyses (ADL)

* Review of Manufacturer Interview Guide

* Subgroup GRIM analysis process

* Presentation of analysis results
(/[y R 7ra/< 4z J/ -/eSI

Ae0^1& ^^;/,A^v /A~o /^ 

1

,IC4,ff/ o/ ... A·4M4 aor-y3.-7-78 -7.00 

t^ 6^- .i b3D<'e"". . 

lf1oJ; g 4At. zo2 - p ;3-533 c 'vest

4toL;t :9(i -. a. -, 63- '564 36S nd

STs \^\\ A^vu\ 3\ - S2C-83)7

i~,.~ UeEr-.Y g 1 mrst, e 5 -797 - 50'Z

/^/c/i^^T~e/ /y/^./?'^ (^^} "6-w4-6 - 

IpNVE. °b6tb htML 5S 832-74!9 -- 88

t\-A^^Vs"s GE AkPLAutFe Lirr3VI 50Z L52-9L4q -3ZAo 

W1 qi~~~~~~~~--j~~~~~ G~^

'" - - '! ' . . .-- . .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~