alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,004]


Chester County Sportswear Including Workers of SkilStaf, Inc., 
Henderson, TN; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 10, 1999, applicable 
to workers of Chester County Sportswear, located in Henderson, 
Tennessee. This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
December 28, 1999 (64 FR 72692).
    At the request of the Company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that workers at Chester County Sportswear are considered to be 
employees of SkilStaf, Inc. The workers were engaged in employment 
related to the production of men's casual slacks and various 
sportswear.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending the 
certification to include workers of SkilStaf, Inc. employed at the 
Henderson, Tennessee facility of the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,004 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Chester County Sportswear, including workers 
employed SkilStaf, Inc. employed at Chester County Sportswear, 
Henderson, Tennessee who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after October 15, 1998 through November 10, 2001 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of January, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-2501 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32(a)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G. Morris


Michael G. Morris


Chief Executive Officer








May 3, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ex parte MUSE.

No. 24793.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Relator was, on the 15th day of February, 1947, convicted in the District Court of Kerr County for burglary, and his punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

Thereafter, and on the 15th day of July, 1947, relator was convicted in the District Court of Pecos County for the offense of felony theft, and his punishment assessed at ten years 'in the penitentiary.

In passing sentence under the Pecos County conviction, the trial court attempted to make the same cumulative of the Kerr County conviction, but under the authority of Ex parte Johnson, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 200, the order was insufficient to meet the legal requirement of definiteness.

The two punishments mentioned run concurrently and are not cumulative.

There is nothing in this record showing that relator has served the term assessed against him of ten years in the penitentiary, and he is therefore not shown to be entitled to his discharge from custody at this time.

The writ of habeas corpus is refused.

Opinion approved by the court.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37736

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

SEAN JEFFERY HUNT

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublished Opin ion No. 376

Filed: March 2, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, Sta te of Idaho, Bingham County. Hon. Darren B. Simpson , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of seven years, with minimum periods of confinement of two years , for two counts of forgery

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. W asden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge, LANSING, Judge and GUTIERREZ, Judge

PER CURIAM

Sean Jeffery Hunt was convicted of two counts of forgery , Idaho Code § 18

- 3601 . The

district court imposed unified sentences of seven years, with minimum periods of confinement of

two years on each count

, and ordered that the sentences would ru n concurrently with each other

and with a separate case in Bonneville County. Hunt appeals, contending that the sentences are

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors t o be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applyin g these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hunt ’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
EXHIBIT
      99.1















**Report
      of Independent Accountants**






To
      the
      Board of Directors and


Shareholder
      of Equity One, Inc.:






We
      have
      examined management’s assertion about Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries’
(the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
      the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Program
      for Mortgage Bankers (“USAP”) as of and for the year ended November 30, 2005
      included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
      is
      responsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
      Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the
      minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
      considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a
      legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended November
      30, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





February
      27, 2006


















**Management’s
      Assertion Concerning Compliance**


**with
      USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**









February
      22, 2006









As
      of and
      for the year ended November 30, 2005, Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”),
      a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular Financial Holdings, Inc., have complied
      in all
      material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage
      Bankers Association
      of America’s *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”) solely
      for purpose of servicing the residential mortgage loans underlying the Loan
      Asset Backed Certificate
      Series 1997-1, 1998-1, 1999-1, 2000-1, 2001-1, 2001-2, 2001-3, 2002-1, 2002-2, 2002-3,
      2002-4, 2002-5, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2004-3, 2004-4,
      2004-- 5,
      2005-1, 2005-2, 2005-A, 2005-3, 2005-B, 2005-4, 2005-C, 2005-5, 2005-D (the “Agreement”)
      except as noted as
      follows:




As
      of and
      for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and errors and
      omissions policies
      in the amounts of $65,000,000 and $25,000,000, respectively.




/s/ John
              N.
              MartellaJohn
              N. MartellaGroup
              Executive
              Vice President of Loan Servicing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

DROPBOX INC

vs.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, MOTION

OFFENSE, LLC, DROPBOX INC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00251-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY Discovery HEARING

Set

Zoom

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by public Zoom on April 05, 2023 at 03:30 PM.

4th day of April, 2023.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 287 Filed 04/04/23 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|New Mexico--West Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|New Mexico--West Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 4      | 3      | 8      | 6      | 9      | 15     | 18     | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### NUMBER 13 - 13 - 00 176 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOSE (JOE) VASQUEZ , A ppellant ,
v. PALM VISTA ESTATES, INC. AND THORA J. HAUSLER , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jose (Joe) Vasquez , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2011

- DCL

- 8106

- E

. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice on grounds that the parties2

have reached a resolution of the matters in dispute in this case. The parties request that this Court dismiss this case with prejudice to each party re

- filing the same

. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is her eby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dism issed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 16th day of May , 201 3

.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Citadel Broadcasting Corporation (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert G. Freedline, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 15, 2007

|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/ ROBERT G. FREEDLINE
|Robert G. Freedline    
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and will be retained by Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. George S. Aburn, DirectorAir and Radiation Management Administration

Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21230-1720

Dear Mr. Aburn:

FE 2

This is in response to your February 3, 2012 letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) docket on area designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS), docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476. In your letter, you

request a written response by February 10, 2012. However, as you know, EPA has been

engaging the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) in a series of telephone calls on

the subject, including a conference call with Secretary Robert M. Summers on February 10,

2012. EPA believes that, in light of the ongoing dialogue between MDE and EPA, a detailedwritten response is premature until we conclude our discussions.

I look forward to a continued dialogue with you and your staff. If you have any

questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, at 215-814-2706. You can have your staffcontact Ms. Maria A. Pino, at 215-814-2181.

0

Sincerely,

Diana , DirectorAir Protection Division
Exhibit 32.01

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael
J. Mendes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Michael J. MendesMichael J. MendesChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 15, 2011

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Steven
M. Neil, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Steven M. NeilSteven M. NeilChief Financial and Administrative Officer


Date: September 15, 2011