alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of NuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven Gershick, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
December 29, 2009


/s/ Steven GershickName:
              Steven
      GershickTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5201 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain filament polyester, foam-backed 

window shade material in a plain weave. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain filament polyester, foam-backed window shade material in a plain 

weave. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FILAMENT POLYESTER, FOAM4 BACKED WINDOW SHADE MATERIAL IN A 

5 PLAIN WEAVE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5201 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Window shade material 

composed of 100% filament polyester yarns in a 

plain weave with a fabric 

weight of 480 grams per 

square meter with a foam 

backing of which 58% is a 

dispersion of polyurethane, 

acrylic and fluoropolymer, 

40% is a white dispersion 

consisting of Titanium Dioxide dispersed in water 

and 2.0% is other auxiliaries (provided for in subheading 5903.90.25) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Calif--Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT NO. 4.1

                           SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE

Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware

     ALPHATECH, INC.

     Total Authorized Issue 30,000,000 Shares Par Value $0.0001 each Common
     Stock, 1,000,000 shares Par Value $0.0001 each Preferred Stock

This is to certify that                          is the owner of fully paid and
non-assessable                                 shares of the above corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly
endorse. Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

Dated _________

                Secretary                      President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# Time and Date:

11 am, Tuesday, October 10, 2000.

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204.

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 pm two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.

Dated: September 29, 2000.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-25491 Filed 9-29-00; 3:26 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Maine HDTV

2 Shore Road

Biddeford, Maine 04005

December 16, 2015

We at Maine HDTV petition the FAA to amend Exemption No. 11483 to Regulatory Docket No 

FAA-2015-0282. 

We request the addition of a second Phantom 3 Professional to our COA.

 A new Phantom 3 Professional was purchased from Fumfie.com on December 1, 2015.

 The serial number is: P76DCJ30A20720

 Order eceipt below.

 This new Phantom 3 Professional has been assigned an ‘N’ number by the FAA in 

Oklahoma City of N151HD. We currently have two other registered Phantoms, N135HD 

& N141HD

 This aircraft will allow us to maintain 4k video quality if our previous Phantom 3 

Professional requires maintenance.

Sincerely,

William Lord, PIC, Maine HDTV - wlord123@gmail.com
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5099 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5099

  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors of an 
            output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 W.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors of an 
            output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 W.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEEDING 37.5 W BUT 
              NOT EXCEEDING 72 W.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        AC electric motors  1%              No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          of an output                                                      12/31/2015
                          exceeding 37.5 W
                          but not exceeding
                          72 W, single
                          phase, each
                          equipped with a
                          capacitor, a
                          manual speed
                          control
                          mechanism, a
                          motor mount of
                          plastics, and a
                          self-contained
                          gear mechanism
                          for oscillation
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8501.40.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -1    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 53     | -79    | 249    | -21    | 214    | -24    | 4,353  | 361    | 1,250  | -893  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,807  | -908   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Gaspar V. Ortega et al., Respondents, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), entered June 30, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that the question of whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim is left to the sound discretion of the court *(see, Matter of Gruber v*
      *338
      *City of New York,*156 AD2d 450; *Matter of Fast v County of Broome,*151 AD2d 930; *Matter of Halperin v City of New York,*127 AD2d 461). Although the plaintiffs excuses for his failure to timely serve a late notice of claim are not overly persuasive, "the absence of an acceptable excuse for the delay is not necessarily fatal to the application” *(Montalto v Town of Harrison,*151 AD2d 652, 653). The facts underlying the claim became known to the defendant within 32 days after the expiration of the 90-day period, and the defendant failed to establish that it would be prejudiced by the granting of the application *(see, Matter of Edwards v Town of Delaware,*115 AD2d 205; *Hutchins v Village of Tupper Lake Hous. Auth.,*72 AD2d 875; *Segretto v Town of Oyster Bay,*66 AD2d 796).

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion *(see, Simmons v New York City Hous. Auth.,*161 AD2d 377). Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
iN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER § 

FOR CHOICE, PLANNED § 

PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS § 

SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES, § 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH § 

TEXAS SURGICAL CENTER, WHOLE § 

WOMAN'S HEALTH, WHOLE § 

WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, § 

SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S § 

SURGERY CENTER, BROOKSIDE § 

WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER PA § 

D/BA BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S § 

HEALTH CENTER AND AUSTIN'S § 

WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, § 

ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S., § 

ALAMO CITY SURGERY CENTER § 

PLLC D/B/A ALAMO WOMEN'S § 

REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES, § 

HOUSTON WOMEN'S § 

REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES, AND § 

HOUSTON WOMEN'S CLINIC, § 

PLAINTIFFS, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF § 

TEXAS, KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY § 

GENERAL OF TEXAS, PHIL WILSON § 

ACTING EXECUTIVE § 

COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS § 

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES § 

COMMISSION, STEPHEN BR1NT § 

CARLTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR § 

OF THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, § 

KATHERINE A. THOMAS, § 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE § 

TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING, EACH § 

IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND § 

MARGARET MOORE, DISTRICT § 

ATTORNEY FOR TRAVIS COUNTY, § 

JOE GONZALES, CRIMINAL § 

ZQZUAPR23 AHII:37 

CAUSE NO. A-20-CV-323-LY 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 102 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR BEXAR § 

COUNTY, JAIME ESPARZA, DISTRICT § 

ATTORNEY FOR EL PASO COUNTY, § 

JOHN CREUZOT, DISTRICT § 

ATTORNEY FOR DALLAS COUNTY, § 

SHAREN WILSON, CRIMINAL § 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY TARRANT § 

COUNTY, RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., § 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY § 

FOR HIDALGO COUNTY, BARRY § 

JOHNSON, CRIMINAL DISTRICT § 

ATTORNEY FOR MCLENNAN § 

COUNTY, KTM OGG, CRIMINAL § 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR HARRIS § 

COUNTY, AND BRIAN MIDDLETON § 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY § 

FOR FORT BEND COUNTY, EACH IN § 

THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, § 

DEFENDANTS. § 

ORDER 

Before the court is the Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction filed April 23, 2020 (Clerk's Doe. #101). As the notice informs the court that Plaintiffs 

have withdrawn their request for a preliminary injunction, 

IT IS ORDERED that the court's Order Extending Order Granting Plaintiffs' Second 

Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Scheduling Order for Plaintiffs' Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction signed April 14, 2020, is in all respects VACATED and the telephonic 

hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction set for April 29, 2020 at 9:30 is 

CANCELED. 

SIGNED thisday of April, 202 

ED STAT 

2 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 102 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Texas--RRC District 9 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Texas--RRC District 9 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 4      | 5      | 0      | 2      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Nasco, North Atlantic Steel Co., Inc., Respondent, v Gilberto Da Silva et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered May 14, 1990, which directed defendants to produce certain documents in response to plaintiff's first request for production of documents, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by granting defendants’ motion for a protective order and striking items numbers 3, 21, 33 and 34 of the request for production of documents without prejudice to plaintiff to assert a more limited demand as to the subjects encompassed in items numbered 3 and 21, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In the underlying action, plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the business of buying and selling steel, alleged, *inter alia,*that defendant Da Silva, who had previously worked for plaintiff, breached his fiduciary duty to plaintiff by providing plaintiff’s competitor with confidential information. Following service of plaintiff’s first request for the production of documents, defendants challenged all 46 of the items requested. However, the dispute was later resolved with regard to all but 16 items. The Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion for a protective order and directed production of all 16 items although production of one item was restricted. On appeal, defendants seek a protective order with respect to 10 of these items.

Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiff was not required to take depositions prior to serving its request for the production of documents (CPLR 3120 [a] [1]; *AGH Distribs. v Silvertone Fasteners,*105 AD2d 648). With respect to item number 3, we agree with defendants that the demand is overbroad in that it seeks information regarding transactions which occurred over a period of four years and fails to restrict the subject matter of the demand to areas relevant to plaintiff’s lawsuit. Accordingly, the demand is stricken, without prejudice to plaintiff’s assertion of a more limited demand. Item number 21 is overbroad as well and is similarly stricken without prejudice to plaintiff’s service of a more limited demand.

*150Since plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the relevancy of items numbers 33 and 34 to the matters actually disputed in this action, these items are stricken. Items 28, 29, 30, 43, 45 and 46, however, are relevant to the underlying causes of action and defendants are directed to produce the requested information. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.