alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7620

JEREMY R. LOVE, a/k/a Jeremy R. Love El, MSTA Branch Temple 43,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KENNETH E. LASSITER; CHRIS RITCH; FNU BEAVER; FNU CARVER; FNU 

DYE; FNU CHESTER; FNU DULA; FNU TURNER; SWINDELL EDWARDS; 

BETTY BROWN; FNU RAMSEY,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:19-cv-00075-MR)

Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: April 30, 2021

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Jeremy R. Love, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy R. Love appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Love v. Lassiter, No. 5:19-cv-00075-

MR (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 507 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 507

 To increase assessment accuracy to better measure student achievement 
   and provide States with greater flexibility on assessment design.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

Mr. Petri (for himself and Mr. Wu) introduced the following bill; which 
      was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase assessment accuracy to better measure student achievement 
   and provide States with greater flexibility on assessment design.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assessment Accuracy and Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF ADAPTIVE ASSESSMENTS.

    Section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 6311) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Use of Adaptive Assessments.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act, a State may provide that the assessments to be used 
        to measure student achievement by that State, and by the 
        schools and local educational agencies of that State, shall be 
        adaptive assessments (rather than the assessments otherwise 
        required by this Act) that accurately assess student 
        achievement above and below grade level while also measuring 
        grade-level performance.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of paragraph (1), an 
        adaptive assessment is an assessment that changes its 
        difficulty according to the performance of a student but 
        reports the outcome of the assessment on a scale that is common 
        to all students.
            ``(3) Evaluation.--The Secretary shall ensure that the 
        protocol for evaluating the adaptive assessments is included in 
        peer review guidance documents.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

p0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140454 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140454 

 COA: 294606 

Branch CC: 09-019231-FC 

JOHN HENRY CHANEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
KPMG

2500 Ruan Center

666 Grand Avenue

Des Moines, IA 50309

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage:

We have examined management's assertion, dated February 25, 2003 that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage complied with the     aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly    stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

February 25, 2003
#### SCOTT v. STATE.

No. 26194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of an intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

BRANDON CALLIER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SUNPATH LTD.; NORTHCOAST 

WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.; and 

JOHN DOES 1-4,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

EP-20-CV-00105-FM

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Before the court is “Defendants Sunpath, Ltd. And Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc.’s 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint” (“Motion”) [ECF No. 3], 

filed May 18, 2020 by Sunpath, Ltd. and Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc. (“Defendants”). 

Defendants seek a two-week extension of the deadline to respond to Brandon Callier’s 

(“Plaintiff”) complaint.1 Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion.

2

 After due consideration, the 

court finds that granting a two-week extension to respond is in the interest of justice and judicial 

efficiency.

1

“Defendants Sunpath, Ltd. And Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to Respond to Complaint” 1, ECF No. 3, filed May 18, 2020.

2

Id.

Case 3:20-cv-00105-FM Document 6 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that “Defendants Sunpath, Ltd. And Northcoast 

Warranty Services, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint” 

[ECF No. 3] is GRANTED. Sunpath, Ltd. And Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc SHALL file 

an answer or other responsive pleading on or before June 2, 2020.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this __19th__ day of May, 2020.

FRANK MONTALVO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-00105-FM Document 6 Filed 05/19/20 Page 2 of 2
NUMBER 13-08-000017-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DANIEL TIMMS, Appellant,

v.

J & C ADVENTURES, INC. D/B/A ALL 

SEASONS POOLS, SPAS, AND PATIOS, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Daniel Timms, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, in cause number E-175,341. Appellant

has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that he no longer desires

to pursue his right to appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 26th day of June, 2008.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 03, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0233. DANIEL ERIC COBBLE v. DENICE D. FACHINI.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

NONE
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, William J. Fox, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of Lehman ABS Corporation, on behalf of Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10 Trust****(the“Trust”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicinginformation required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports; and

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, theDepositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, asTrustee.

 

Date: March 31, 2010

 
| By:    |   | /s/ William J. Fox                                    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | William J. Fox                                        |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  and Executive Vice President |   |

 

----
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Michigan Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Michigan Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -1    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | -11    | 0      | -2     | 3      | -1     | 4      | -1    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | -1     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25061]

[[Page 58565]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,056]

Beaumont Neckwear, Inc., New York, New York; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on September 5, 2000 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Beaumont Neckwear, 
Incorporated, New York, New York.
    A petitioner was separated from the subject firm more than a year 
prior to the date of the petition (August 20, 1999). Section 223(b)(1) 
of the Trade Act of 1974 specifies that no certification may apply to 
any worker whose last separation occurred more than a year before the 
date of the petition. Consequently, further investigation in this case 
would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of September, 2000.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-25061 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siboney Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William D. Edwards, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 /s/ William D. Edwards, Jr.William D. Edwards, Jr.Chief Financial Officer 
 
 November 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                           6,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,550)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,383
<PP&E>                                         225,976
<DEPRECIATION>                               (121,925)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,768
<SALES>                                        196,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,173
<CGS>                                          116,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,613
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, News America Debenture-Backed
          Series 2002-9 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K
          containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
          of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
          required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
          the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 21, 2007


         /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President