alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Louisiana Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Louisiana Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 713    |        |        |        |        | 524    | 525    | 517    | 522   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 538    | 526    | 495    | 421    | 434    | 601    | 543    | 437    | 411    | 457   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 436    | 391    | 323    | 295    | 263    | 292    | 280    | 303    | 300    |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
PriceWaterhouseCoopers

PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP

160 Federal Street

Boston MA 02110-9862

Telephone (617) 428 8400

Facsimile: (617) 439 7393

 

 

Report of Independent Accountants

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its subsidiaries' (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards ("standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

March 7, 2003
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -2    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -1     | 4      | 28     | 83     | -16    | -9     | 0      | 1      | 4      | -2    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5152 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3–Benzenedicarboxamide, 

N, N′-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. KISSELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3– 

Benzenedicarboxamide, N, N′-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4- 

piperidinyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3–BENZENEDICARBOXAMIDE, N, N′-BIS-(2,2,6,6- 

4 TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINYL)-. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.11 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 1,3–Benzenedicarboxamide, N, N′-bis-(2,2,6,6- 

8 tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-) is amended by striking the 

9 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

10 2015’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5152 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Quillen HOWARD, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 13, 1953.

O. J. Cockrell, Jackson, for movant.

J. D. Bucktnan, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of whisky in local option territory imposing a fine of $100 and 60 days in jail.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 18     | 65     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60504 Summary Calendar

DANNY CRUZ

- PERDOMO , Petitioner

v.
D ANA BOENTE , ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A205 845 443

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner Danny Perdomo

- Cruz, a native and citizen of Honduras, seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismiss ed his appeal from the IJ’s denial of his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Ag ainst Torture (CAT). With respect to his claim for withholding of removal, Cruz

- Perdomo principally
asserts that the BIA’s determination that religion was not “one central reason”

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 8, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60504 Document: 00513867265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2017N o. 15

- 60504

2 for his persecution is not supp orted by substantial evidence. Even if we

c onstrue some of the record evidence as supporting Cruz

- Perdomo’s claim, he fails to show that “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled” to conclude that he is eligible for withholding of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); see Shaikh v. Holder , 588 F.3d 861, 863 (5th Cir. 2009); Zhang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Cruz

- Perdomo also challenges the denial of his CAT claim. H e provides little to no detail to support his assertion that a government official, or some one acting in an o fficial capacity, would instigate or acquiesce in his torture. T he BIA’s decision to affirm the IJ’s denial of CAT relief is supported by substantial evidence. See Ontunez

- Tursios v. Ashcroft , 303 F.3d 341, 353 (5th Cir. 2002). PETITION DENIED. Case: 15-60504 Document: 00513867265 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2017
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5012 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on MCPA-2-ethylhexyl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on MCPA2-ethylhexyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MCPA-2-ETHYLHEXYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.54 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetate (MCPA7 2-ethylhexyl)) is amended by striking the date in the effec8 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5012 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31

                           Long Beach Securities Corp.

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                      LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-2
                            ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATE
                                  SERIES 2005-2

      I, Michael J. Giampaolo, an Executive Vice President of Long Beach
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Long Beach Mortgage Loan
Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Dated as of March 1, 2006

                                                  /s/ Michael J. Giampaolo
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Giampaolo
                                                Executive Vice President and COO
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4959 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4959

        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Cassia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Ruppersberger introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Cassia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLEO CASSIA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Oleo Cassia (CAS    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          No. 84961-46-6)                                                   12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3301.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Estill (Peanut) BENGE, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 12, 1953.

Lewis & Weaver, of London, for mov-ant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Laurel Circuit Court by Estill (Peanut) Benge from a judgment convicting him of the possession of liquor for the purpose of sale in local option territory and fixing his punishment at a fine of $60 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days.

A consideration of the facts disclosed by the record and the authorities cited in the briefs discloses no error prejudicial to movant’s substantial rights and the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 15**

 

**(KPMG LLP Letterhead)**

 

November 9, 2007

 

Southwest Water CompanyLos Angeles, California

 

Re: Registration Statements (Nos. 333-77881,333-35252, 333-63196, 333-69662, 333-70194, 333-106506, 333-111586, 333-121426and 333-133399) on Form S-3 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-18513,333-38935, 333-39506, 333-39508, 333-109444, 333-117713 and 333-134575) on FormS-8

 

With respect to the subject registrationstatements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report datedNovember 9, 2007, related to our review of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Actof 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registrationstatement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accountingfirm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered publicaccounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

 

----
#### J. B. GLASSCOCK et ux., Appellants, v. Robert Y. BLACK et ux., Appellees.

No. 10286.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Oct. 13, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1954.

Wm. E. Davenport, San Angelo, for appellants.

Forest A. Harding, San Angelo, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, Robert Y. Black and wife, have moved to dismiss this appeal filed herein by appellants J. B. Glasscock and wife. One of the grounds of such motion is that appellants failed to give notice of appeal as required by Rule 353, T.R.C.P.

Appellants’ transcript was filed in this Court on July 19, 1954. Appellees’ motion to dismiss was filed August 3, 1954.

A careful examination of the transcript discloses that the only notice of appeal therein is found in appellants’ appeal bond which was filed in the trial court June 29, 1954. . -This notice would, no doubt, be sufficient if it had been timely filed.

Rule 353, supra, requires that notice of appeai be given or filed as therein provided “ * * * within ten days after the judgment or order overruling motion for new trial is rendered.”

The judgment in this case was rendered April 26, 1954, and appellants’ motion for new trial was overruled June 1, 1954.

It is obvious that appellants did not give notice of appeal within the time prescribed by the rules. Under-these circumstances we have no jurisdiction except to dismiss this appeal. Howe v. Howe, Tex. Civ.App., 223 S.W.2d 944, Eastland, writ refused; Backus v. Roper, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 261, Fort Worth.

Appeal dismisséd.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4850 

AN ACT 

To allow for innovations and alternative technologies that 

meet or exceed desired energy efficiency goals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4850 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enabling Energy Sav3 ing Innovations Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES. 

5 Section 342(f) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

6 Act (42 U.S.C. 6313(f)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraphs 

8 (2) through (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) 

9 through (6)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(6) INNOVATIVE COMPONENT TECH13 NOLOGIES.—Subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) 

14 shall not apply to a walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer 

15 component if the component manufacturer has dem16 onstrated to the satisfaction of the Secretary that 

17 the component reduces energy consumption at least 

18 as much as if such subparagraph were to apply. In 

19 support of any demonstration under this paragraph, 

20 a manufacturer shall provide to the Secretary all 
3 

•HR 4850 EH

1 data and technical information necessary to fully 

2 evaluate its application.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4850 

AN ACT 

To allow for innovations and alternative techciency goals. nologies that meet or exceed desired energy effi-
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0519**

**Directorate ID 2010 -**  **SW -**  **068 -** **AD AD Number 2013**  **- 20**  **- 17**  **Costs of Compliance** We estimate that this AD affects 80 helicopters of U.S. Registry
. Based on an average labor rate of $85 per hour, we estimate that operators will incur the f ollowing costs in order to comply with this AD. Amending the RFM w ill require about 0.5 work
- hour, for a cost per helicopter of about $43 and a cost to U.S. operators of $3,440. Installing the decal w ill require about 0.2 work
- hour, and required parts w ill cost about $5, for a cost per helicopter of $22 and a cost to U.S. operators of $1,760. Based on these estimates, the total cost of this AD is $65 per helicopter and $5,200 for the U.S. operator fleet.