alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5189 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work gloves. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MCKEON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work 

gloves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS’ WORK GLOVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking heading 9902.14.01; and 

8 (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the fol9 lowing new heading: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5189 IH

‘‘ 9902.14.01 Mechanics’ work gloves, 

valued not over $3.16 per 

pair (provided for in subheading 6216.00.58) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO U.S. NOTE.—Subchapter II of 

2 chapter 99 is amended by striking existing U.S. Note 18 

3 to such subchapter and by inserting in such subchapter 

4 the following new U.S. Note: 

5 ‘‘18. For purposes of heading 9902.14.01, the term 

6 ‘mechanics’ work gloves’ means gloves having the fol7 lowing characteristics: imitation leather palms and fingers 

8 with fourchettes; backs comprising either one layer of syn9 thetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 

10 of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and 

11 the inner layer of tricot fabric.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 12, 2006
    /s/ DAVID W. HOCKENBROCHTDavid W. Hockenbrocht, Chief Executive Officer Date: May 12, 2006
    /s/ RICHARD L. LANGLEYRichard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer 25
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edimer Rosero, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered June 19, 1986, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was convicted for participating in a cocaine distribution ring. The only substantive points raised by defendant relate to the status of the prosecutor as a lawyer who had not been admitted to the Bar in New York State. These issues were resolved when we affirmed the judgment as to codefendants Munoz, Sanchez-Medina, and Linares *(see, People*
      *236
      *v Munoz,*153 AD2d 281, *Iv denied with Iv to renew*75 NY2d 922; *People v Sanchez-Medina,*153 AD2d 281, *Iv denied with Iv to renew*75 NY2d 924; *People v Linares,*158 AD2d 296, *Iv denied*76 NY2d 791). In the present appeal, defendant presents no argument which distinguishes this appeal from those previously decided. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59848-59849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25710]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the Director, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following subcommittee meeting.

    Name: Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the 
Director, CDC.
    Time and Date: 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m., October 16, 2000.
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE, Building 16, Room 5126, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 25 people.
    Purpose: This subcommittee will anticipate, identify, and 
propose solutions to strategic and broad ethical issues facing CDC.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items will include updates from 
the Associate director for Science, Dixie E. Snider, M.D., M.P.H.; a 
discussion on ethical considerations of studies to evaluate the risk 
of transmission of Human Herpes virus (HHV-8) in international 
settings; and anticipating issues involved in future decisions 
regarding this issue.

[[Page 59849]]

    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Kathy Cahill, Executive 
Secretary, Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., M/S/ D-24, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 404/639-
7060.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 28, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-25710 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
Exhibit 99.1

CHARTER FOR THE  AUDIT, FINANCE & RISK COMMITTEE  ENBRIDGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.

INTRODUCTION



I. CONSTITUTION



II MEMBERSHIP



---





III. MEETINGS



IV. FUNDING



V. REVIEW OF CHARTER



VI. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES



---





A. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO THE EXTERNAL AUDITORS.



---





B. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO AUDITS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING.



---







---





D. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO FINANCE.



E. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO RISK MANAGEMENT



F. OTHER DUTIES OF AUDIT, FINANCE & RISK COMMITTEE



---







VII. COMMITTEE TIMETABLE



VIII. DELEGATION TO SUBCOMMITTEE



---



QuickLinks
#### CRAYTON v. STATE.

No. 23587.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $100.

*509No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
RE:	Request	for	Exemption

Jacob	Knudsen

1202	N	Jackson	Street

Gilbert,	AZ	85233

Mobile:	(480)	205-3246

E-Mail:	imjacobk@gmail.com

To	Whom	It	May	Concern:

This	petition	is	being	submitted	for	exemption	under	Section	333; FAA	

Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012,	Public	Law	112-95	FEB.	14,	2012,	Section	

333.

An	exemption	is	requested	in	order	to	operate	a UAV/UAS,	DJI	Inspire	1	Quadcopter	

Aircraft,	to	permit	the	use	of	providing	services	for	profit	which	will	include	aerial	

photography	and	aerial	cinematography	for	real	estate,	residential	and	commercial	

construction	firms,	aerial	mapping,	and	special	events	to	include	but	not	limited	to	

weddings,	private	or	public	parties/events,	business	advertising,	promotional	

events,	geological	surveying,	and	environmental	studies.

The	demand	is	in	place	for	these	services	in	my	local	market	and	my	services	will	

benefit	many	local	businesses.	Traditional	methods	of	aerial	photography	and	

videography,	typically	via	airplane,	are	not	a	viable	option	for	many	small	

businesses	due	to	the	high	costs.	By	utilizing	my	services	via	UAV/UAS,	better	

results	will	be	achieved	while	being	more	cost	effective	and	safer	to	the	

environment	due	to	no	fuel	and	emitted	gasses	from	planes.	

Prior	to	each flight/operation	of	the	UAV/UAS,	I	will	conduct	a	pre-flight	safety	

inspection.	Any	and	all	repairs	will	be	performed	by	manufacturer	authorized	repair	

facilities/providers.	Flights	will	not	take	place	over	densely	populated	areas	or	

private	property	without	the	owners	permission.	The	UAV/UAS	will	only	be	

operated	within	visual	line	of	sight	and	will	not	be	flown	within	5	miles	of	an	airport	

or	above	400	feet	from	ground	level.	The	FAA	can	be	confident	that	operations	of	

this	UAV/UAS	will	achieve	optimum	levels	of	safety	while	benefiting	local	

businesses	in	need	of	these	services.	

The	specific	sections	of	14	C.F.R	from	which	I	am	seeking	exemption	are	as	follows:

14	C.F.R.	Part	21;

14	C.F.R.	45.23(b);

14	C.F.R.	61.101(e)(4),	&	(5);	14	C.F.R.	61.113(a)	&	(b);

14	C.F.R.	61.133	(a);

14	C.F.R.	61.23(a)	&	(c);

14	C.F.R	91.7(a)

14	C.F.R.	91.9(b)(2);	14C.F.R.	91.109(a);

14	C.F.R.	91.119;
14	C.F.R.	91.121;

14	C.F.R.	91.151(a);

14	C.F.R.	91.203(a)	&	(b);	14	C.F.R.	91.405(a);

14	C.F.R.	91.407(a)(1);	14	C.F.R.	91.409(a)(2};	14	C.F.R.	91.417(a)	&	(b).

Please	find	the	DJI	Inspire	1	user manual,	maintenance	manual,	safety	guidelines,	

and	battery	safety	guidelines	are attached	for	your	reference.

I	truly	thank	you	for	your	consideration.

Sincerely,

Jacob	Knudsen
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRCT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDNG ORDER REGARDING POST-MARKMAN PATENT CASES

The Court enters this standing order to address potential difficulties related to the 

COVID-19 virus that parties in patent cases may experience. The Court recognizes that preparing 

for a patent trial can be an arduous task in the best of times and is obviously much more difficult 

when mobility has been severely restricted by the Government. As such, for cases that have had 

their Markman hearing, the Court takes the following approach in hopes of alleviating these 

difficulties:

The Court is willing to consider all reasonable adjustments to the current scheduling 

orders to allow the parties to complete discovery, and have adequate time to complete expert 

reports, take expert depositions, and file appropriate motions. Prior to contacting the Court, 

however, the parties must first meet-and-confer about the proposed changes. The Court will give 

great deference to proposals that are made jointly and may set a telephonic conference to 

consider those proposals. To the extent the parties cannot agree on a modified schedule, the 

parties are directed to contact the Court’s law clerk to set-up a telephonic conference.

SIGNED this 9th day of April, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00351-ADA Document 68 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|West Virginia Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|West Virginia Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 74    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 97     | 85     | 79     | 91     | 80     | 86     | 87     | 87     | 92     | 100   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 86     | 103    | 97     | 108    | 93     | 62     | 61     | 71     | 72     | 73    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 105    | 106    | 99     | 68     | 85     | 85     | 110    | 115    | 100    |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 25743.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 12, 1952.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $200' and 30 days in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|Exhibit 15.1
|------------



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form F-3/A (Nos. 333-165745 and 333-165748) of NewLead Holdings Ltd. of our report dated May 15, 2012 relating to
the successor financial statements and of our report dated March 18, 2010, except with respect to the effects of the reverse stock
split discussed in Note 1, as to which the date is December 29, 2010, and except for the effects of the discontinued operations
discussed in Note 25, as to which the date is May 15, 2012, relating to the predecessor financial statements, which appear in this
Form 20-F.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.

Athens,
Greece
May 15, 2012
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5007 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2 methoxy-4-trifluoromethylpyridine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2 methoxy-4- 

trifluoromethylpyridine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2 METHOXY-4-TRIFLUOROMETHYLPYRIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2 methoxy-4- 

trifluoromethylpyridine 

(CAS No. 219715–34–1) 

(provided for in subheading 2933.39.61) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5007 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                Exhibit 10.13A



Inland Empire LPO
3633 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 855
Ontario, CA 91764


                                 June 30, 1997


Suburban Water Systems
1211 E. Center Court Dr.
Covina, CA 91724-360311


Gentlemen:

     This letter is to confirm that Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
("Bank") has agreed to extend the maturity date of that certain credit
accommodation granted by Bank to Suburban Water Systems ("Borrower") in the
maximum principal amount of FOUR MILLION DOLLARS ($4,000,000.00) pursuant to the
terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Bank and Borrower
dated as of June 30, 1996, as amended from time to time (the "Agreement").

     The maturity date of said credit accommodation is hereby extended until
September 1, 1997.  Until such date, all terms and conditions of the Agreement
which pertain to said credit accommodation shall remain in full force and
effect, except as expressly modified hereby.  The promissory note dated as of
June 30, 1996, executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank which
evidences said credit accommodation, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A (the "Note"), shall be deemed modified as of the date this letter is
---------                                                                     
acknowledged by Borrower to reflect the new maturity date set forth above.  All
other terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect, without
waiver or modification.

     Borrower acknowledges that Bank has not committed to make any renewal or
further extension of the maturity date of the above-described credit
accommodation beyond the new maturity date specified herein, and that any such
renewal or further extension remains in the sole discretion of Bank.  This
letter constitutes the entire agreement between Bank and Borrower with respect
to the maturity date extension for the above-described credit accommodation, and
supersedes all prior negotiations, discussions and correspondence concerning
said extension.
<PAGE>
 
Suburban Water Systems
June 30, 1997
Page 2


          Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions
contained herein by dating and signing one copy below and returning it to my
attention at the above address on or before July 15, 1997.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       WELLS FARGO BANK,
                                        NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


                                       By: /s/RICHARD MADSEN
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Richard Madsen
                                           Vice President


Acknowledged and accepted as of __June 30,1997:


SUBURBAN WATER SYSTEMS

By: /s/PETER J. MOERBEEK
    --------------------
       Peter J. Moerbeek
Title: Secretary
       ---------

By: /s/DANIEL N. EVANS
    ------------------
       Daniel N. Evans
Title: VP Finance, CFO
       ---------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MONICA PEDRAZA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 5:20-cv-00567-OLG 

v. 

NATIONAL MANAGEMENT RECOVERY CORP., 

 Defendant. 

________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

The Plaintiff, Monica Pedraza, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, gives notice that this action is hereby 

dismissed with prejudice. 

DATED: July 1, 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Joshua A. Mize 

Joshua A. Mize, Esq. 

Texas Bar No. 24104795 

MIZE LAW, PLLC 

110 Front Street, Suite 300 

Jupiter, FL 33477 

Phone: (407) 913-6800 

Fax: (407) 604-7410 

Email: jmize@mize.law 

Attorney for the Plaintiff, 

Monica Pedraza

 

Case 5:20-cv-00567-OLG Document 8 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. 97C-0466]


Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Phaffia 
Yeast; Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the 
effective date of August 8, 2000, for the final rule that appeared in 
the Federal Register of July 6, 2000 (65 FR 41584), and that amended 
the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of phaffia 
yeast as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to enhance the 
color of their flesh.

DATES: Effective date confirmed: August 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aydin Orstan, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3076.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 6, 2000 (65 
FR 41584), FDA amended the color additive regulations to add new 
Sec. 73.355 Phaffia yeast (21 CFR 73.355) to provide for the safe use 
of phaffia yeast as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to 
enhance the color of their flesh.
    FDA gave interested persons until August 7, 2000, to file 
objections or requests for a hearing. The agency received no objections 
or requests for a hearing on the final rule. Therefore, FDA finds that 
the effective date of the final rule that published in the Federal 
Register of July 6, 2000, should be confirmed.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73

    Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, Foods, Medical devices.
    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e) and 
under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 
5.10), notice is given that no objections or requests for a hearing 
were filed in response to the July 6, 2000, final rule. Accordingly, 
the amendments issued thereby became effective August 8, 2000.

    Dated: September 29, 2000.
Margret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-25704 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### Louis F. Abt, Jr., Appellant, v Paul Lawrence et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered on February 28, 1990, which denied plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 for renewal of a prior motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this dispute over real estate broker commissions, the IAS court previously determined that there were issues of fact as to the intent of the parties precluding a grant of plaintiff’s original motion for partial summary judgment. This court affirmed (154 AD2d 958). Renewal of the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Plaintiff did not present any new material facts *(see, Bayridge Air Rights v Blitman Constr. Corp.,*160 AD2d 589). In any event, plaintiff has at most raised additional issues of fact which warrant a trial *(see, James v Nestor,*120 AD2d 442, 443). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ. *[See,*— AD2d — (Jan. 31, 1991).]