alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5181 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5181

 To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or 
           coprecitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Marino introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or 
           coprecitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECITATES OF YTTRIUM OXIDE AND EUROPIUM 
              OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures or coprecipitates 
of yttrium oxide and europium oxide) is amended--
            (1) by amending the article description to read as follows: 
        ``Mixtures or coprecitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide 
        (CAS Nos. 1314-36-9 and 1308-96-9) (provided for in subheading 
        2846.90.80)''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 

V. 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al. 

FILED 

MAY 1 52020 

CLERK, U.S. DSTgjRT 

WESTERN tjExAs 

BY /( ,4Vj 

' EPUTY CLERK 

NOTICE REGARDING CHANGE OF IDENTIFICATION OF JAIDEEP S. CHAWLA 

The plaintiff and relator, Jaideep S. Chawla, acting pro Se, respectfully notifies this Court 

that he will not changing his legal name at this time and once again identifies as Jaideep S. 

Chawla. Accordingly, the name, "John Adams," does not appear on the enclosed pleadings and 

will not appear on future pleadings. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

JAIDEEP S. CHAWLA 

PROSE 

Mailing Address: 

12 Lexington Avenue 

Charlestown, MA 02129 

Dated: May 11,2020 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day I served a copy of the Notice Regarding Change of 

Identification of Jaideep S. Chawla, Ex Parte Motion to Seal, and First Amended Complaint by 

U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail on each of the following: 

The Honorable William Barr 

Attorney General of the United States 

U.S. Department of Justice 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20530 

The Honorable John Bash 

U.S. Attorney, Western District of Texas 

800 Franklin Avenue, Suite 280 

Waco, Texas 76701 

Dated: May 11,2020 

Jaideep S. Chawla
#### Michele Grasso et al., Appellants, v Raffaele Fiumara, Defendant, and Dime Savings Bank of New York et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud and negligence, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Buell, J.), dated December 21, 1988, which dismissed the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Dime Savings Bank of New York and American Title Insurance Company.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant bank and title insurance company were entitled to rely upon the statutory short-form power of attorney *(see,*General Obligations Law § 5-1501) presented to them by the defendant Fiumara, the plaintiffs’ son-in-law, as that form was valid on its face and the circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss *(cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co.,*63 NY2d 827). Thus, the Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the negligence causes of action asserted against those defendants. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### George Petrou, Individually and as a Shareholder of Karl Ehmer International Foods, Inc., Respondent, v Karl Ehmer International Foods, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jerome E. Goldman, Appellant.

In a shareholder’s derivative action to recover damages for fraud and conversion, the defendant Jerome E. Goldman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated December 15, 1988, which, in effect, denied in all respects his motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On September 15, 1981, the plaintiffs brother assigned 20,000 shares of stock in Karl Ehmer International Foods, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, to the plaintiff. It is undisputed that the assignment was not recorded on the corporate books.

In July 1988 the plaintiff commenced a shareholder’s derivative action alleging that, between May 1981 and December 1982, the defendants conspired and willfully embarked upon a plan designed to defraud and deceive the corporation and its shareholders, and wrongfully deprived it of its assets, thereby causing its insolvency. The complaint further alleged that, from May 1, 1981 through August 24, 1982, the defendants wrongfully converted to their own use substantial sums of money believed to be in excess of $121,000, and concealed their wrongful acts until May 1988.

The defendant Goldman moved to dismiss the complaint *339insofar as it is asserted against him as time barred and for failure to state a cause of action, alleging that he, Goldman, was never a director of the subject corporation. The defendant Goldman subsequently added a third basis for dismissal, namely, that the plaintiff lacked standing to commence the derivative action inasmuch as he was not a shareholder of record of the corporation at the time of the alleged wrongful acts.

Under Delaware law, an equitable owner of shares in a corporation is considered to have shareholder status within the meaning of 8 Delaware Code Annotated § 327 *(see, Harff v Kerkorian,*324 A2d 215, 216, *mod on other grounds*347 A2d 133 [Del]).

When a plaintiff asserts causes of action sounding in both fraud and conversion, the longer Statute of Limitations period for fraud *(see,*CPLR 213 [8]) will apply, provided that the complaint sets forth at least a semblance of the elements of fraud at that stage *(see, Central Trust Co. v Goldman,*70 AD2d 767). The two-year discovery rule *(see,*CPLR 213 [8]; 203 [f]) may apply, provided that the plaintiff uses diligent efforts to uncover the fraud. Inasmuch as there was no evidence that the plaintiff was guilty of a lack of due diligence, dismissal of the complaint was properly denied *(see, Erbe v Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.,*3 NY2d 321).

Moreover, the record presents an issue of fact as to Goldman’s status as a director of the corporation. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Virginia Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Virginia Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 55    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 72     | 72     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5274 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pepperoncini, prepared or 

preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pepperoncini, 

prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic 

acid, not frozen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PEPPERONCINI, PREPARED OR PRESERVED 

4 OTHERWISE THAN BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC 

5 ACID, NOT FROZEN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.27 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 pepperoncini, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vin9 egar or acetic acid, not frozen) is amended by striking the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5274 IH

1 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

2 2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4219 — ABN Amro/Nextiraone Europe)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 113/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7098

DOUGLAS R. VAUGHN, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NURSE TERRY, Intake Nurse; NURSE ALVIN, Intake Nurse; NURSE DIANE 

ANTHONY, Head Nurse; NURSE CHELTON, Intake Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, Medical Staff/Nurses,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00565-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: February 28, 2022 Decided: March 23, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7098 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Douglas R. Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Fitzjames Quirk, SANDS 

ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7098 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Douglas R. Vaughn II appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Nurse Terry, 

No. 1:19-cv-00565-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. June 21, 2021). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7098 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/23/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
##### 



Amended
Agreement
     Definitions
  Amendment to Exhibit I
  Commitment Termination Date
  Representations and Warranties
 Section 5.1




---



##### 



Effectiveness
 Amendments and Waivers
 Counterparts
 Continuing Effect; No Other Amendments
 CHOICE OF LAW
 [SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]
 -2-




---



##### 



SNG FUNDING COMPANY, L.L.C.By:
    SNG Finance Company, L.L.C., its ManagerBy:
    /s/ John J. HopperName:
    John J. HopperTitle:SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, as ServicerBy:
    /s/ John J. HopperName:
    John J. HopperTitle:
    Vice President & TreasurerBNP PARIBAS, acting through its New York Branch, as
Program Agent and as Managing Agent for the Starbird
Investor GroupBy:
    /s/ Sean ReddingtonName:
    Sean ReddingtonTitle:
    Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Michael GonikName:
    Michael GonikTitle:
    Director  STARBIRD FUNDING CORPORATION,
as a Conduit PurchaserBy:
    /s/ R. Douglas DonaldsonName:
    R. Douglas DonaldsonTitle:
    Treasurer [Signature pages to Amendment No. 2 to
SNG Receivables Purchase Agreement]




---



##### 



BNP PARIBAS, acting through its New York Branch,
as Committed InvestorBy:
    /s/ Sean ReddingtonName:
    Sean ReddingtonTitle:
    Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Michael GonikName:
    Michael GonikTitle:
    Director [Signature pages to Amendment No. 2 to 
SNG Receivables Purchase Agreement]
EXHIBIT C 

Case 6:20-cv-00124-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 3
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUTCH’S RATHOLE & ANCHOR 

SERVICE, INC. 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00124 

JURY TRIAL REQUESTED 

 

JOINT IDENTIFICATION OF DISPUTED TERMS 

AND THE PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS 

U.S. Patent No. 9,915,132 

No. Claim Term(s) 

Party 

Proposing 

Term(s) 

Cameron’s Proposed 

Construction(s) 

Butch’s Proposed 

Construction(s) 

1 

a single fluid 

conduit 

(claim 9) 

Defendant plain and ordinary meaning Indefinite 

2 

a single fluid 

conduit coupled 

to the well 

fracturing tree 

(claim 9) 

Defendant 

plain and ordinary meaning, 

which is “a single fluid 

conduit coupled to a specific 

type of Christmas tree 

installed specifically for the 

fracturing process” 

Indefinite 

3 

positioned at 

(claim 9) 

Defendant “attached to or adjacent to” Indefinite 

4 

comprising an 

additional well 

fracturing tree 

(claim 12) 

Defendant 

plain and ordinary meaning, 

which is “adding another 

specific type of Christmas 

tree installed specifically for 

the fracturing process” 

Indefinite 

Case 6:20-cv-00124-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 3
2 

U.S. Patent No. 10,385,645 

No. Claim Term(s) 

Party

Proposing 

Term(s) 

Cameron’s Proposed 

Construction(s) 

Butch’s Proposed 

Construction(s) 

1 

one and only one 

rigid fluid pathway 

(claims 1, 10, 20) 

Defendant plain and ordinary 

meaning Indefinite 

2 

“at least one rigid 

fluid conduit” / 

“the at least one 

rigid fluid conduit” 

Defendant plain and ordinary 

meaning Indefinite 

3 pipe joints 

(claim 1) 

Defendant “lengths of pipe” “structures for joining 

pipes” 

4 

outlet branch(es) 

 (claims 2–4, 10, 

13, 18) 

Defendant 

plain and ordinary 

meaning, which is 

“extension(s) from the 

shared trunk line” 

Indefinite 

5 

the second 

connection block 

the second pipe 

the third studded 

connection 

(claim 14) 

Defendant plain and ordinary 

meaning Indefinite 

6 

the second pipe 

the first pipe 

the third pipe 

(claim 15) 

Defendant plain and ordinary 

meaning Indefinite 

Case 6:20-cv-00124-ADA Document 34-3 Filed 08/26/20 Page 3 of 3
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

KAJEET, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIGHTSPEED SOLUTIONS, LLC

Defendant.

§

§

§ 

§

§

§

§ 

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-203-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR INTRA-DISTRICT 

TRANSFER OF VENUE TO THE AUSTIN DIVISION OF THE WESTERN DISTRICT 

OF TEXAS

Plaintiff Kajeet, Inc. (“Kajeet”) opposes Defendant Lightspeed Solutions, LLC’s (

“Lightspeed”) Motion for Intra-District Transfer of Venue to the Austin Division of the Western 

District of Texas because of the two other related cases that Kajeet has currently pending in the 

Waco Division. Kajeet has filed patent infringement cases involving the same patent-in-suit here 

against two other companies in this Division. See Kajeet, Inc. v. Jamf Software, LLC, Civil 

Action No. Case No. 6:20-cv-0302-ADA and Kajeet Inc. v. Asavie Technologies Limited, Civil 

Action No. 6:20-cv-705-ADA.

In its Motion, Defendant Lightspeed Solutions, LLC (“Defendant”) asks the Court to 

transfer this case to the Austin Division but also requests that this Court maintain the case on its 

docket. Based on the facts presented in Lightspeed’s Motion, Kajeet would not otherwise oppose 

the intra-district transfer. However, given that this case along with the two others involving the 

same patent will be maintained on this Court’s docket, for purposes of judicial economy it would 

make sense for this case to stay in the Waco Division. Doing so would avoid inefficiencies such 

as additional or separate hearings on common matters including claim construction and 

Case 6:20-cv-00203-ADA Document 32 Filed 09/22/20 Page 1 of 2
2

discovery issues. As the Court will conduct separate trials for the cases, Kajeet is not opposed to

this case being tried in the Austin Division.

Accordingly, Kajeet respectfully requests that the Court deny the Motion for IntraDistrict Transfer and keep this case here in the Waco Division up until the time of trial.

Dated: September 22, 2020 /s/ Jonathan T. Suder

Michael T. Cooke

Corby R. Vowell

Richard A. Wojcio

FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE

604 East 4th Street, Suite 200

Fort Worth, TX 76102

817-334-0400

Fax: 817-334-0401

jts@fsclaw.com

mtc@fsclaw.com

vowell@fsclaw.com

wojcio@fsclaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR KAJEET, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document was 

served on all counsel of record via email on September 22, 2020.

/s/ Jonathan T. Suder

Case 6:20-cv-00203-ADA Document 32 Filed 09/22/20 Page 2 of 2
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg) — Elfering Export GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-27/05) (1)

(Export refunds - Material condition - Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 - Beef and veal - Absence of proof as to the origin of the products - Applicability of penalties)

(2006/C 143/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elfering Export GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Articles 5(4) and 51(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1999 L 102, p. 11) — Indication, in the export declaration, that the products are of Community origin — Lack of proof of the products' origin — Applicability of penalties

Operative part of the judgment

The declaration made in an export declaration that the product in respect of which a refund is sought is of Community origin is information to which a penalty may attach under Article 51(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products in conjunction with Article 5(4) thereof.

----

(1)OJ C 82, 02.04.2005.

----
#### REYNOLDS v. STATE.

No. 26202.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1953.

*126No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 60 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
----

----

| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      December 12, 2008                               |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Dongliang (Frank) Su                         |   |   |   |
| Dongliang      (Frank) SuActing      ChiefFinancial Officer |

----