alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5132 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5132

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain aluminum lamp-
                            holder housings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain aluminum lamp-
                            holder housings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALUMINUM LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain aluminum lamp-holder 
housings) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5051 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5051

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic 
                            filament yarns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic 
                            filament yarns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC FILAMENT YARNS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain synthetic filament 
yarns) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-09-0110-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 17, 2009

	______________________________

	In the Interest of D.V., Jr., A.V. and A.V., Children		

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 99th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 99-505,558; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. SOWDER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

			       _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Helen Vela (appellant) filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to alter the trial court’s judgment on child support surplus.  We dismiss the appeal.  The clerk’s record was filed with this court on April 6, 2009, and the reporter’s record on June 17, 2009.  Appellant’s brief fell due on July 20, 2009.  It was not received, however.  By letter dated July 30, 2009, we notified appellant that the due date for the brief had lapsed, that the brief had not been filed, and that no motion to extend the deadline had been received by the court.  Citing Tex. R. App. P. 38.8, the letter also notified appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining her failure to file a brief was submitted by August 10, 2009.  To date, no brief or motion to extend the deadline has been filed.  Nor has the court received any explanation for the omission.                                      	

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P.  38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

							Per Curiam
4822-1229-9730.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, 

individually and derivatively on behalf of

ZROBLACK LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN SAENZ; MIGUEL VILLAREAL, 

JR.; and GUNN, LEE & CAVE, P.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§ 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 5:20-CV-00571-OG

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE HIS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FIRST AMENDED 

APPLICATION FOR SEIZURE, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

______________________________________________________________________________

On this date, the Court considered Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to File His 

First Amended Complaint and First Amended Application for Seizure, Temporary Restraining 

Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Permanent Injunctive Relief (the “Motion”). After considering 

the Motion and the response and arguments of counsel, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion as 

improperly filed under seal.

Date: November ___, 2020

________________________________________

THE HONORABLE ORLANDO L. GARCIA, 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 28-1 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 1
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 30, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1034 Lower Tribunal No. F15-1083

________________ 

### John J. Wilson, Jr., Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge. John J. Wilson, Jr., in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

| |     |                                                  
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135866),

| |     |                                                  
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135708),

| |     |                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145390), and

| |     |                                                  
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------
| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-148417);

of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
February 29, 2008

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: THE ESTATE OF KATHRYN S. MCLEOD, DECEASED

PETITION OF: JOAN Y. SUMMY

- LONG :

:

:

:

: No. 666 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                   
|Louisiana - North Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|Louisiana - North Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 138    | 23     | 228    | 283    | 588    | 70     | 57     | 2,091  | 917    | 82    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 598    | 4,948  | 276    | 964    | 2,277  | 1,597  | 493    | 368    | 2,259  | 1,575 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,009  | 1,824  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-097]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Florida East Coast Railway 
Bridge, across the Okeechobee Waterway, mile 7.4, at Stuart, Martin 
County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Florida East Coast Railway bridge across the Okeechobee Waterway, mile 
7.4, Stuart, Martin County, Florida. This deviation allows the 
drawbridge owner or operator to not open the bridge for short periods 
of time, approximately 30 to 45 minutes in duration, from 7:00 until 
4:00 pm from October 9, 2000 through October 12, 2000. This temporary 
deviation is required from October 9, 2000 until October 12, 2000, to 
allow the bridge owner to safely complete repairs of the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from October 9, 2000 to October 12, 
2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Florida East Coast Railway drawbridge 
across the Okeechobee Waterway at Stuart, has a vertical clearance of 7 
feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the fenders in the closed 
position and during construction will have a horizontal clearance of 50 
feet. On September 8, 2000, Florida East Coast Railway, the drawbridge 
owner, requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 
33 CFR 117.5 which requires drawbridge to open promptly and fully when 
a request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to 
allow necessary repairs to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive 
manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.35 for the purpose of 
repair completion of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Florida 
East Coast Railway Bridge need not open the bridge for short periods of 
time, approximately 30 to 45 minutes in duration. The deviation is 
effective for a period of 4 days beginning on October 9, 2000 and 
ending on October 12, 2000.

    Dated: September 22, 2000.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 00-25485 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
EXHIBIT B

Case 1:20-cv-01523-KAM-CLP Document 1-2 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8 Case 1:20-cv-02439-AJN Document 1-2 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 13 Case 1:20-cv-02399-VEC Document 1-2 Filed 03/18/20 Page 1 of 2 Case 5:20-cv-00360-XR Document 1-2 Filed 03/21/20 Page 1 of 33

Case 3:20-cv-00714-N Document 1-2 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID 7
3/26/2020 Jeffrey Epstein photos show him wheeled into Downtown Hospital

https://nypost.com/2019/08/10/photos-show-jeffrey-epstein-as-hes-wheeled-into-downtown-hospital/ 1/2

METRO EXCLUSIVE
3/26/2020 Jeffrey Epstein photos show him wheeled into Downtown Hospital

https://nypost.com/2019/08/10/photos-show-jeffrey-epstein-as-hes-wheeled-into-downtown-hospital/ 2/2

FILED UNDER JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SUICIDE
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.5


                                June  22, 2000

[name]

          Re:   Incentive Stock Option Agreement

Dear ____________:

     Please refer to your Incentive Stock Option Agreement dated
___________________ (the "Option Agreement") with CyberStorage Systems
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, ("CyberStorage Massachusetts") a copy
of which is attached hereto. As you know, pursuant to a Merger Agreement dated
June 16, 2000 which became effective on June 22, 2000 (the "Merger Agreement"),
CyberStorage Massachusetts was reincorporated in Delaware as a Delaware
corporation.

     This will confirm our understanding and agreement that pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, the incentive stock option represented by the Option Agreement
formerly representing the right to acquire up to  ________ shares of Common
Stock, no par value, of CyberStorage Massachusetts shall instead represent the
right to acquire up to _____________ shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value of
with CyberStorage Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("CyberStorage
Delaware").  Any reference in the Option Agreement to "Corporation" shall
hereinafter mean CyberStorage Delaware and "1999 Stock Option Plan" shall mean
CyberStorage Delaware's 2000 Stock Option Plan.  In all other respects, the
Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  Without limitation of
the foregoing, the term of the option, the exercise price per share, the number
of shares with respect to which the option is exercisable as of the date hereof,
and the rate at which the option shall become exercisable hereafter shall remain
as set forth in the Option Agreement.

     Please confirm your understanding and agreement with the foregoing by
signing the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated and returning it to me.

                                    Very truly yours,



                                    John L. Thonet
                                    President

Agreed to as of June 22, 2000


__________________________________
#### DE FORD v. STATE.

No. 26731.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

*432No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is felony theft,', the punishment, two years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. The one bill of exceptions is qualified by the court and, as qualified, presents no error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,804,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,302,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                   173,028
<INVENTORY>                                 10,543,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,720,198
<PP&E>                                       2,626,229
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,436,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,536,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,360,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          323,620
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,716,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,536,304
<SALES>                                     17,462,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,462,554
<CGS>                                       15,863,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,555,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,016)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,090,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (353,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (737,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (737,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        



</TABLE>
#### COCKRELL v. STATE.

No. 24637.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1950.

H. J. Brice, Snyder,, C. C. McDonald, Wichita Rails, for appellant.

George P. .Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

•. HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction ;was for driving a motor vehicle on a public .highway in-.Scurry County while intoxicated. A jury found appellant guilty and assessed the punishment at a fine of $500.00.

Prosecution was by complaint and information, both of which were filed on June 11, 1949. The-offense is alleged to have occurred on June 11, 1949. There is no- allegation in the information that the offense was committed, before the information was filed. This defect is fatal. The trial -court should have sustained appellant’s motion to quash the information. See Art. 414, C.C. P., Sub. 6; Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. .433, p. 230 and cases cited therein; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 126 S.W.2d 981; Id.,137 Tex.Cr.R. 98, 128 S.W.2d 415; Cobb v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 337, 139 S.W.2d 272; Hoot v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 316, 194 S.W.2d 97; Martini v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 155, 199 S.W.2d 784; Id., Tex.Cr.App., 205 S.W.2d 988.

Tlie complaint is not subject to the defect pointed out in the information. If the State so desires a new information based on the complaint could be filed. Under the record as it now appears it is imperative that the judgment bé reversed and the cause remanded, with the further order that the prosecution -be dismissed under the present information.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,748-01

IN RE ANTHONY AGADO, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1236042-A IN THE 180 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the 180th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and

that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court

entered an order designating issues on May 11, 2018.

Respondent, the Judge of the 180 District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with th

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application. In the

alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have

the District Clerk submit the record on such application. In either case, Respondent’s answer shall
2

be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: August 8, 2018

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

BRIAN ROBERT BLAZER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Case No. 6-20-cv-00276-ADA 

 

REFERRAL ORDER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE GILLILAND 

It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Derek 

T. Gilliland for disposition of all non-dispositive pretrial matters as provided in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(A) and for findings and recommendations on all case-dispositive motions as provided 

in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 

SIGNED this 29th day of April, 2022. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00276-ADA-DTG Document 25 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 1