alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5320 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the quarterly 

wages paid threshold for classification as an agricultural labor employer 

for purposes of unemployment taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. HANNA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the quarterly wages paid threshold for classification as 

an agricultural labor employer for purposes of unemployment taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Growing Small Farms 

5 Act of 2012’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5320 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN QUARTERLY WAGES PAID THRESHOLD 

2 FOR CLASSIFICATION AS AGRICULTURAL 

3 LABOR EMPLOYER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 3306(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’. 

7 (b) EMPLOYMENT.—Clause (i) of section 

8 3306(c)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’. 

10 (c) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec11 tion 3306(a) of such Code is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘In the case of agricultural 

13 labor’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) In the case of agricultural 

14 labor’’, 

15 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

16 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and moving 

17 such clauses 2 ems to the right, and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub19 paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(B) In the case of any year beginning after 

21 2013, the dollar amounts contained in paragraph 

22 (1)(A) and subsection (c)(1)(A)(i) shall each be in23 creased by an amount equal to— 

24 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

25 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment deter26 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 5320 IH

1 year in which the taxable year begins, deter2 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2012’ for 

3 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

4 thereof. Any increase determined under the pre5 ceding sentence shall be rounded to the nearest 

6 multiple of $100.’’. 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to remuneration 

9 paid after December 31, 2012, for services performed 

10 after such date. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5158 

To reduce temporarily the duty on 2,3-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on 2,3-Pyridinedicarboxylic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,3-PYRIDINEDICARBOXYLIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.17 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,3-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid) is amended— 

7 (1) in the general rate of duty column, by strik8 ing ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘0.5%’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5158 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5269 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5269

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Hexanediamine, N,N'-Bis(2,2,6,6-
 tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-, P/W 2,4-Dichloro-6-(4-morpholinyl)-1,3,5-
                               triazine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,6-Hexanediamine, N,N'-Bis(2,2,6,6-
 tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-, P/W 2,4-Dichloro-6-(4-morpholinyl)-1,3,5-
                               triazine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,6-HEXANEDIAMINE, N,N'-BIS(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-
              PIPERIDINYL)-, P/W 2,4-DICHLORO-6-(4-MORPHOLINYL)-1,3,5-
              TRIAZINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,6-Hexanediamine,  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          N,N'-Bis(2,2,6,6-                                                 12/31/2015
                          tetramethyl-4-
                          piperidinyl)-, P/
                          W 2,4-Dichloro-6-
                          (4-morpholinyl)-
                          1,3,5-triazine
                          (CAS No. 82451-48-
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3812.30.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: February 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 20)]
[Notices]               
[Page 5093-5094]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01fe10-73]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as-needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly 
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b 
(c)(6). Grant applications for the ARRA: Limited Competition 
``Electronic Data Methods'' (U13) applications are to be reviewed and 
discussed at this meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications. This information is exempt from mandatory

[[Page 5094]]

disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: ARRA: Limited Competition ``Electronic Data 
Methods'' (U13).
    Date: February 26, 2010 (Open on February 26 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 
a.m. and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Forest Glen Conference Room, Bethesda, Maryland 
20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: January 21, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-1902 Filed 1-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Non-Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, 

individually and derivatively on behalf 

of ZROBLACK, LLC. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JOHN SAENZ, MIGUEL

VILLARREAL, JR., and GUNN, LEE, 

& CAVE, P.C.

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-cv-00571-OLG

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT 

TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE

____________________________________________________________________________

JONATHAN VILLAREAL, individually and derivatively on behalf of ZROBLACK, 

LLC, collectively the Plaintiffs, state that they do not consent to proceed before the assigned 

Magistrate Judge in the above styled matter.

Respectfully submitted,

THE VETHAN LAW FIRM, PC

By: /s/ Joseph L. Lanza

Charles M. R. Vethan 

Attorney-in-Charge

Texas Bar No. 00791852

Steven A. Costello

Texas Bar No. 24062677

VETHAN LAW FIRM - HOUSTON

Two Memorial City Plaza

820 Gessner, Suite 1510

Houston, Texas 77024

Tel: (713) 526-2222

Fax: (713) 526-2230

Email: edocs@vwtexlaw.com

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 18 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Non-Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate

Page 2 of 3

Joseph L. Lanza

Texas bar No. 00784447

VETHAN LAW FIRM – SAN ANTONIO

11459 Huebner, Suite 101

San Antonio, Texas 78230

Tel: (210) 824-2220

Fax: (713) 526-2230

Email: edocs@vwtexlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 18 Filed 08/07/20 Page 2 of 3
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Non-Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Court 

on the 7th day of August 2020, and electronically served on the date reflected in the 

ECF system upon all parties registered to receive notice pursuant to the Court’s 

CM/ECF system.

David A. Vanderhinder

State bar No. 24070787

DVanderhinder@dykema.com

Ryan J. Sullivan

State Bar No. 24102548

RSullivan@dykema.com

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

112 East Pecan St., Suite 1800

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Attorney for Defendant John Saenz

George R. Spencer, Jr.

State Bar. No. 18921001

gspencer@langleybanack.com

Natalie F. Wilson

State Bar. No. 24067769

nwilson@langleybanack.com

Attorneys for Defendants Gunn, Lee & Cave, P.C.

And Miguel Villarreal, Jr.

/s/ Joseph L. Lanza

 Joseph L. Lanza

Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 18 Filed 08/07/20 Page 3 of 3
## FERGUS COUNTY PORT AUTHORlTY··

.-. ";.

04-08-2013 TO: Department ofTransportation SUBJECT: Essential Air Service Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 FROM: Fergus County Port Authority Board (FCPA) 712 Main Street, Suite 210 Lewistown, Montana 59457-2561 Board Members Joe Bauman, Chairperson Jim Chalmers Sam Weidner Tom McKenna Karen Kuhlmann Pete Peterson Terry Atkinson Tony Pierce Bob Steinman

As the FCPA. Our mission is to enhance economic development in the central Montana. We are writing this letterofobjection to the elimination of EAS in Lewistown for the following reasons. 1. Upon hearing public input and reviewing ridership numbers, the ridership was more in line with EAS subsidies per rider when itflew to a major hub for connecting flights. (Denver) When the service provider changed in May 2011 they changed the destination to Billings, MTthe numbers rapidly declined. Some ofstated reasons from public inputare dependability ofcurrent carrier. They overnight the aircraft in Havre, MT with no hanger to park inside. This creates obvious issues in winterthat create cancellations offlights. We do have and the previous EAS provider did use our hanger to overnight the aircraft thus helping eliminate those issues. Another issue voiced was the lack ofcorrect instrumentation on aircraftto approach Lewistown runway in below visual conditions. And our airportwas closed in August 2011 for runway repair, thus reducing ridership numbers. 2. Lewistown presently has no other publictransportation optionsto orfrom our community. To lose the last one would create many hardships on the local business that do send employee's outside ofthe area. 3. By eliminating the EAS, you will eliminate many existingjobs atthe airport. Security, airport operations, aircraft servicing to name afew. In a communitythat alreadyis having a difficult time with economic sustainability, itwill be another major impactto us. 4. By eliminating the EAS service. You also will limit our airportfacility access to upkeep/modernization funding opportunities that are available to airports that do have operating publictransportation in them thus making itextremely difficultto ever get back any type ofair service 5. The timing and speed you are acting on for elimination ofservice does notgive any community time to attemptto correctthe issue, whether by changing provider, route or marketing. We feel that you should allow the current provider or adifferent EAS providerto reestablish the route to Denver. Give the communities and the approved provider a period oftime. One ortwo years to market and increase ridership.The provider could thenroute the flightto overnight in a hanger facility such as Lewistown, and increase ridership again. Then atthe end ofthatyear ortwo period, reevaluate the ridership and see ifit is more in line with current guidelines.

Thank you for your consideration,

Joe Bauman, Chairperson Fergus County Port Authority
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 28, 2014

NO. 03-13-00705-CV

John E. Rodarte, Sr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Department of Family and Protective Services and 

Judge Mary Roman, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION –

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 17, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that John E. Rodarte, Sr. has not prosecuted his appeal and 

that the appeal is therefore subject to dismissal. The Court dismisses the appeal for want of 

prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the 

court below.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

VICTOIRE VAN DER PAS, 

Plaintiff

v.

ASSURAVEST, LLC, HUGHES

PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC,

GREG HUGHES, and STEVEN R.

SIXBERRY,

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

Case No. 1:20-CV-235-SH

ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed April 23, 2021

(Dkt. 31), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Non-Contract Claims With Prejudice, filed 

October 14, 2021 (Dkt. 40). 

The parties have entered into an agreement to settle this lawsuit. As part of their agreement, 

Plaintiff Victoire Van Der Pas agreed to dismiss her claims against Defendants Assuravest, LLC, 

Hughes Private Capital, LLC, Greg Hughes, and Steven R. Sixberry in two stages. In her Motion 

to Dismiss, Plaintiff requests that the Court dismiss her non-contract claims with prejudice. 

Defendants do not oppose the Motion. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Non-Contract Claims With Prejudice (Dkt. 40) is 

GRANTED. The Court HEREBY DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s claims of 

common-law fraud, statutory fraud, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, violations of the 

Texas Securities Act, violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and Federal Securities 

Fraud.

Because Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment seeks judgment only on Plaintiff’s 

claims under the Texas Securities Act and Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, that Motion 

Case 1:20-cv-00235-SH Document 41 Filed 10/21/21 Page 1 of 2
2

is now moot. Accordingly, it is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment (Dkt. 31) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

The deadline for the parties to file their joint motion to dismiss remains November 22, 2021. 

Dkt. 39.

SIGNED on October 21, 2021.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00235-SH Document 41 Filed 10/21/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63(Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall notbe relied on by any person for any other purpose.
     The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Community Financial Holding Company,Inc. (the “small business issuer”), hereby certifies as follows:
     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small businessissuer.
     Dated this 24th day of March, 2005.     /s/  Ann K. Marshall Ann K. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small businessissuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hotel Outsource Management
International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jacob Ronnel, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
      /s/ Jacob
      RonnelJacob
      Ronnel, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  OfficerHotel
      Outsource Management International, Inc.April
      10, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-1999-6404]


Extension of Comment Period; Petition for Grandfathering of Non-
Compliant Equipment; National Railroad Passenger Corporation

    On October 18, 1999, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 
(Amtrak) petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for 
grandfathering of non-compliant passenger equipment manufactured by 
Renfe Talgo of America (Talgo) for use on rail lines between Vancouver, 
British Columbia and Eugene, Oregon; between Las Vegas, Nevada and Los 
Angeles, California; and between San Diego, California and San Luis 
Obispo, California. Notice of receipt of such petition was published in 
the Federal Register on November 2, 1999, at 64 FR 59230. Interested 
parties were invited to comment on the petition before the end of the 
comment period of December 2, 1999.
    Through published notice in the Federal Register, FRA has extended 
the comment period in this proceeding and explained the reasons 
therefor. FRA most recently extended the comment period until January 
31, 2000. See 65 FR 2223; Jan. 13, 2000. By this notice, FRA is further 
extending the comment period until February 22, 2000. This extension 
will allow FRA to resolve an ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
request for information related to this proceeding, see 65 FR 2223, and 
permit the requester sufficient time in which to analyze any further 
documents that may be released by FRA. FRA will place in the docket a 
copy of any documents provided to the FOIA requester. FRA expects that 
further extensions of the comment period will not be necessary.
    Comments received after February 22, 2000, will be considered to 
the extent possible. Amtrak's petition, documents inserted in the 
docket, and all written communications concerning this proceeding are 
available for examination during regular business hours (9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.) at DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 
(Plaza Level), 400 Seventh, SW, Washington, DC 20590-0001. All 
documents in the public docket are also available for inspection and 
copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, D. C. on January 28, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-2551 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development 
(#1199).
    Date and Time: October 19th and 20th, 2000; 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 814, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Larry S. Scadden, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 292-8636.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate formal proposals submitted to the 
Program for Persons with Disabilities.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25197 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M