Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43328; File No. SR-PCX-00-13] 

                    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          notice is hereby given that on May 16, 2000, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On August 16, 2000, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.[3]                                          The Commission is publishing this notice of filing and order granting accelerated approval to the proposed rule change.                

## I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 6.88 (“Rule”) to restrict the entry of certain electronically created option orders on the Exchange via the Exchange's Member Firm Interface (“MFI”). The text of the Rule is set forth below.

## POETS

## Pacific Options Exchange Trading System

## Rule 6.88

                        (a) POETS is the Exchange's automated trading system comprised of the options order routing system, the automated execution system (Auto-Ex), the on-line limit                               ( print page 58835)                            order book system (Auto-Book), and the automatic market quote update system (Auto-Quote). Orders may be sent to POETS via the Exchange's Member Firm Interface (MFI).                    

                        (b) Except as provided in subsection (b)(1), Member firms may not enter orders via the MFI or permit the entry of orders via the MFI if those orders are created and communicated electronically without manual input (“computer generated orders”). Except as provided in subsection (b)(1), order entry by public customers or associated persons of Member Firms must involve manual input such as entering the terms of an order into an order-entry screen or manually selecting a displayed order so that the order will be sent. Nothing in this Rule prohibits Member Firms from electronically sending to the Exchange orders manually entered by customers into front-end communications systems (                        *e.g.*, Internet gateways, online networks, etc).                    

(1) Computer generated orders may be sent  to the Exchange via the MFI only if they are properly designed with a “CG” in the “additional instruction” field. Orders so designated will be re-routed for representation by a Floor Broker. Computer generated orders are not eligible for automatic execution via the Auto-Ex System.

## ¶5232 Exchange Sponsored Hand Held Terminals for Floor Brokers

                        Rule                         *6.89*                        [6.88]—No change.                    

## ¶5233 Proprietary Brokerage Order Priority Terminals

                        Rule                         *6.90*                        [6.89]—No change.                    

* * * * *

## II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item V below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

### A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule Change

#### 1. Purpose

                    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to restrict the direct entry of certain option orders that are created and communicated electronically,                     *i.e.,*                    without manual imput, into the Exchange's POETS system.[1]                                          The Exchange represents that the text of the Rule is similar to the text of Rule 717(f) of the International Securities Exchange (“ISE”).[5] 

Subsection (a) of the Rule briefly describes the POETS system. Specifically, Subsection (a) states that POETS is the Exchange's automated trading system comprised of the options order routing system, the automatic execution system (“Auto-Ex”), the on-line limit order book system (“Auto-Book”), and the automatic market quote update system (“Auto-Quote”). Subsection (a) further states that orders may be sent to POETS via the Exchange's MFI. This subsection is intended to provide background for the provision on computer-generated orders, which is contained in Subsection (b).

                    Subsection (b) states that except as provided in subsection (b)(1), member firms may not enter orders via the MFI or permit the entry of orders via the MFI if those orders are created and communicated electronically without manual input. Subsection (b) defines such orders as “computer-generated orders.” It further states that, except as provided in subsection (b)(1), order entry by public customers or associated persons of member firms must involve manual input such as entering the terms of an order into an order-entry screen or manually selecting a displayed order so that the order will be sent. It further states that nothing in the Rule prohibits member firms from electronically sending orders that are manually entered by customers into front-end communications system (                    *e.g.,*                    Internet gateways, online networks, etc.) to the Exchange.                

Subsection (b)(1) of the Rule states that computer-generated orders may be sent to the Exchange via the MFI only if they are properly designated with a “CG” in the “additional instruction” field. Orders so designated will be re-routed for representation by a floor broker. Finally, Subsection (b)(1) states that computer-generated orders are not eligible for automatic execution via the Auto-Ex system.

                    The Exchange represents that its business model depends upon market makers for competition and liquidity. Public customer orders on the PCS receive priority over market maker bids and offers.[6]                                          The Exchange believes that allowing electronic entry directly into the Exchange's POETS system could give customers with order-generating systems a significant advantage over market makers. In its view, this could undercut the Exchange's business model. The Exchange notes that under the proposed rule change, computer-generated orders can still be sent for execution on the Exchange; however, they may not be sent for execution directly via POETS. The Exchange also notes that the Rule is similar to ISE Rule 717(f); however, the ISE Rule permits computer-generated orders to be entered on the ISE only if they are “nonmarketable limit orders to buy (sell) that are priced higher (lower) than the best bid (offer) on the Exchange.” By contrast, the PCX proposal allows                     *all*                     computer-generated orders to be entered on the PCX.                

                    Currently, PCX member firms that are located off the trading floor may send option orders to the trading floor in three different ways. First, a member firm representative may call a PCX member firm representative on the trading floor on the telephone and place an order. The member firm representative, while present in a member firm booth on the trading floor, would then either have the order taken manually to a floor broker in the trading crowd for representation of the order, or have the order sent electronically to a floor broker (via a hand-held terminal) in the trading crowd who would then represent it. Second, a member firm                           ( print page 58836)                        representative may send an order to a member firm representative in a booth on the trading floor via an electronic transmitter. (This transmitter would be proprietary equipment of a member firm). The member firm representative in the booth would then have the order represented in the trading crowd in one of the two ways described above. Third, a member firm representative may send an order electronically through the MFI, which links member firms with the Exchange's electronic trading system, POETS. Eligible orders sent through the MFI to POETS may be: (1) Automatically executed against orders in the limit order book; (2) placed in the limit order book (if they are not marketable); (3) automatically executed via Auto-Ex; or (4) routed to a floor broker hand-held terminal in the trading crowd.                

                    Accordingly, under the rule change, computer-generated orders may be sent to the Exchange in any of the three ways described above. However, if they are submitted electronically to the Exchange via the MFI, they must be properly identified with a “CG” indicator. All properly identified computer-generated orders that are sent via the MFI will be re-routed for representation by a floor broker. When an order is re-routed, it is transmitted either: (1) To a member firm booth on the trading floor; or (2) to a floor broker in the trading crowd via the floor broker hand-held terminal,[7]                                          depending upon the instructions of the member firm that is responsible for the order. As noted above, orders transmitted to a member firm booth may be subsequently transmitted to a floor broker in the trading crowd either by placing the order telephonically [8]                                          or by manually taking the order to the floor broker in the crowd. An order that is transmitted to a floor broker may be placed in the limit order book for representation by the Order Book Official as long as that order is a “non-broker/dealer customer order.”                

The Exchange notes that under the rule change, properly marked computer-generated orders that are sent via the MFI will be-routed in the same manner in which broker-dealer orders that are sent via the MFI are currently re-routed. When a broker-dealer order is routed to a floor broker in the trading crowd, the order is vocalized and, if the order represents the best bid or offering price on the PCX, the Market  Quote Terminal Operator (“MQTP”) will cause the order to be displayed. Computer-generated orders for the accounts of broker-dealers will be handled in the same manner under the proposed rule change. However, if a computer-generated order is for the account of a public customer, it may be represented by a floor broker in the trading crowd, in which case the MQTO will  cause it to be displayed, or the floor broker may place the order in the limit order book, in which case the Order Book Official at that trading post will cause it to be displayed and will continue to represent it.

#### 2. Statutory Basis

                    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with with Section 6(b) [9]                                          of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),[10]                                          in particular, in that it facilitates transactions in securities, removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and promotes just and equitable principles of trade.                

### B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. 

### C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Other 

Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received. 

## III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action 

The PCX has requested that the proposed rule change be given expedited review and accelerated effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act. 

## IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change 

                    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of the Act applicable to a national securities exchange, particularly Section 6(b)(5) [11]                                          and Section 6(b)(8) [12]                                          of the Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder.[13] 

The Commission has carefully considered whether the Rule inhibits competition between the PXC's automated customers and those who do not employ automated means of order entry. The Commission notes that in the equity markets, for example, limit orders from public customers have been a valuable source of quote competition. Nonetheless, the Commission recognizes that the PCX's business model depends on market makers for competition and liquidity. Allowing electronic order entry into Auto-Ex could give automated customers a significant advantage over market makers. This could undercut the PCX's business model. Moreover, the Rule would allow electronically generated orders to be sent o the Exchange via the MFI if they are properly designated with a “CG” in the instruction field. Properly designated orders are then routed to the trading crowd for representation by a floor broker. However, the order is not eligible for execution through Auto-Ex. 

                    The Commission approved a similar rule for the fully automated options exchange, the ISE. In approving the application of the ISE for registration as a national securities exchange, the Commission explicitly recognized that the ISE's business model “depends on market makers for competition and liquidity.” [14]                                          Recognizing that allowing electronic order entry into the ISE could “give automated customers a significant advantage over [the ISE's] market makers,” the Commission stated that it was unable to conclude that the limitation violated the statutory requirements.[15] 

                    ISE Rule 717(f) regarding computer-generated orders specifically permits the entry of non-marketable limited orders that improve the best price available on the ISE. This provision is designed to accommodate non-marketable limit orders because these orders serve to increase competition and improve quotes. Similarly, non-marketable electronically generated limit orders that improve the best price on the PCX will be permitted to enter the Exchange through the MFI, if they are properly designated with a “CG” in the “additional instruction” field. These                           ( print page 58837)                        orders will be routed from the MFI to the trading crowd for representation by a floor broker.                 

Although the ISE and PCX rules are not identical, both ISE Rule 717(f) and PCX Rule 6.88 permit non-marketable limit orders that improve the price to be sent to the exchange and routed to the relevant trading mechanism for execution. It is the Commission's view that the Exchange's approach strikes a reasonable balance. It provides protection to PCX market makers; at the same time, it permits properly designated electronically generated orders to be represented by a floor broker in the trading crowd. As it stated with respect to its approval of ISE Rule 717(f), the Commission is unable to conclude that the new PCX Rule violates any statutory requirements. 

                    The Commission further notes that the Rule does not prohibit electronically generated orders from being sent to the PCX; rather, merely prevents them from being entered into Auto-Ex. Thus, properly designated electronically generated orders will be routed through the MFI to the trading crowd for representation by a floor broker. PCX rules require that all customer orders be executed at the PCX's displayed bid or offer at the time the order is represented in the crowd.[16]                                          Depending upon the circumstances, the order may be filled at a price better than the PCX's displayed bid or offer. Therefore, although, electronically generated customer orders will not be eligible for automatic execution through Auto-Ex under the Rule, they will still be entitled to receive an execution price that is as good as or better than the PCX's displayed bid or offer.                 

                    The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change, as amended, prior to the thirtieth day after publication of notice thereof in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act. Specifically, the Commission has approved similar proposals filed by the ISE [17]                                          and the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE”).[18]                                          Approval of this proposal on an accelerated basis will enable the PCX to compete on an equal basis with these other exchanges and thus is consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.                

## V. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-00-13 and should be submitted by October 23, 2000.

## VI. Conclusion

For the reasons discussed above, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

*It is therefore ordered*, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-PCX-00-13), as amended, adopting Rule 6.88, is approved.                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority. [19] 

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 788s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the proposed rule to allow computer-generated orders to be sent to the Exchange via the Member Firm Interface (“MFI”) if they are properly designated as such.                         *See*                         Letter from Michael Pierson, Vice President, Regulatory Policy, PCX, to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated August 15, 2000  (“Amendment No. 1”).                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                                     *See*                        Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27633 (January 18, 1990), 55 FR 2466 (January 24, 1990) (approving implementation of POETS). POETS is the Exchange's automated trading system. It is more fully described                         *infra.*
        Back to Citation      

5.                             ISE Rule 717(f) states:                    

                        “Members may not enter, nor permit the entry of, orders created and communicated electronically without manual input (                        *i.e.,*                        order entry by Public Customers or associated persons of Members must involve manual input such as entering the terms of the order into an order-entry screen or manually selecting a displayed order against which an off-setting order should be sent), unless such orders are non-marketable limit order to buy (sell) that are priced higher (lower) than the best bid (offer) on the Exchange (                        *i.e.,*                        limit orders that improve the best price available on the Exchange). Nothing in this paragraph, however, prohibits Electronic Access Members from electronically communicating to the Exchange orders manually entered by customers into front-end communications systems (                        *i.e.,*                        Internet gateways, online networks, etc.).”                         *See*                        Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42455 (February 24, 2000), 65 FR 11388 (March 2, 2000) (approving application of ISE for registration as a national securities exchange).                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                             See PCX Rules 6.52(a) (types of orders permitted to be maintained in the limit order book), 6.75(a)-(b) (priority of bids and offers), 6.86 (guaranteed markets for public customers) and 6.87(a) (eligibility of public customers for use of Auto-Ex System).                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             See PCX Rule 6.88.                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                             See PCX Rule 6.2(h)(4)(C).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

10.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Section 6(b)(5) requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to, among other things, promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. It also requires that those rules not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.                    
        Back to Citation      

12.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). Section 6(b)(8) requires that the rules of the exchange do not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.                    
        Back to Citation      

13.                             In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

14.                                                     *See supra*                         note 4.                     
        Back to Citation      

15.                                                     *Id.*
        Back to Citation      

16.                                                     *See*                         PCX Rule 6.86(a).                    
        Back to Citation      

17.                                                     *See supra*                         note 5.                    
        Back to Citation      

18.                             Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43285 (September 12, 2000), 65 FR 56972 (September 20, 2000) (approving SR-CBOE-00-01).                    
        Back to Citation      

19.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3a(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-25133 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M