alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert B. Hacker, Appellant.

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Coutant, J.), rendered March 3, 1982, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree and robbery in the first degree.

Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to represent himself. "A defendant in a criminal case may invoke the right to defend *pro se*provided: (1) the request is unequivocal and timely asserted, (2) there has been a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and (3) the defendant has not engaged in conduct which would prevent the fair and orderly exposition of the issues” *(People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10,17).

In the case at bar, defendant appeared in court some two months after the indictment was handed down, for the purpose of seeking to replace assigned counsel. Defendant was apparently dissatisfied because assigned counsel refused on ethical grounds to pursue certain defenses urged by defendant. County Court pointed out that if the defenses were unethical, a change in attorneys would not alter the course taken by defense counsel. The court concluded by stating, "Your choice, as far as I’m concerned, is to utilize trial counsel that’s made available to you or doing without it”. The following colloquy occurred:

*730"defendant: I will do without it, then.

"the court: You’re going to represent yourself?

"defendant: Yep.

"the court: You’re sure you want to do that?

"defendant: Yep.”

A discussion with defendant and his mother revealed that defendant had an eighth grade education and had little understanding of what he was giving up by waiving his right to counsel. We are of the view that the record does not show the required unequivocal request *(see, supra).*Rather, it was a spur of the moment decision, prompted more by defendant’s dissatisfaction with the denial of his request to change assigned counsel than by a knowing and voluntary election to forego the benefit of an attorney and proceed *pro se.*

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J. R, Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
#### WYNN v. STATE.

No. 26714.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1954.

*567Ben F. Mooring, Paris, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of whisky for sale in a dry area, with punishment fixed at a fine of $1,000 and 365 days in jail, enhanced by reason of a prior conviction for an offense of like character.

The residence situated at 304-5th Street, 'Southwest, in Paris, Texas, was a duplex apartment. The two apartments were entirely separate and distinct one from the •other. The north apartment was occupied by a family who are not further identified an this record.

After obtaining a search warrant to search the above residence, alleged to be >occupied by unknown persons, the sheriff .and his deputy went to the vicinity of the •dwelling and there lay in wait to see who •came to or went from the residence.

Appellant was seen to drive an automo-ibile “behind the house” and back up and drive-off. One Williams was in the automobile • with, him. Some thirty 'minutes later, the same parties in the same automobile, with appellant driving, were seen to pull into the driveway. The two officers then approached the house from the rear. Williams got out of the automobile, went to the rear door of the south apartment, and was in the act of unlocking the door when the officers appeared. The officers told Williams to unlock the door, which he did. The apartment was vacant and unoccupied. A large quantity of beer and whisky was found in the bathroom thereof.

There was evidence that Williams’s license to drive an automobile was, at that time, suspended. Other than, a showing by the circumstances of possession by Williams of a skeleton key, there is no testimony suggesting who was in possession of the house. There is no. testimony as to who was the actual .owner of the house. There is an absence of any testimony identifying the ownership of the automobile in which the parties were riding.

Appellant insists that the trial court erred in failing to charge upon circumstantial evidence, as requested.

It is the rule of long standing that if the main fact is proved as a matter of inference from the other facts in evidence, the case rests upon circumstantial evidence. Branch’s P.C., Sec. 2478.

. Here, appellant’s guilt of possessing the intoxicating liquors found in the apartment is made to depend, alone, upon the inference to be drawn by his presence at the time and upon his prior association with Williams, who had possession of the key to and was endeavoring to enter the apartment at the time he was apprehended.

It is upon the facts stated that this conviction is predicated. Appellant attacks such facts as being insufficient to support the conviction.

In view of the fact that we have concluded the case must be reversed for another reason, we will pretermit a determination of that question at this time.

*568■  The charge upon circumstantial- evidence should have been given to the :ju-ry.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5071 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oysters (other than smoked), 

prepared or preserved. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oysters (other 

than smoked), prepared or preserved. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OYSTERS (OTHER THAN SMOKED), PREPARED 

4 OR PRESERVED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.07 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 oysters (other than smoked), prepared or preserved) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5071 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit  32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Brampton Crest International Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Giuliano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph GiulianoJoseph GiulianoChief Executive and Chief Financial Officer





Date:May 17, 2011
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

BYRON SEABERRY DEXTER,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-2031 November 15, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michael S. Williams, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4954 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compression-ignition internal 

combustion piston engines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compressionignition internal combustion piston engines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COMPRESSION-IGNITION INTERNAL 

4 COMBUSTION PISTON ENGINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4954 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Compression-ignition internal combustion piston engines with cylinder capacity of less than 1 liter, for 

use in vehicles of subheading 8709.19.00 (provided for in subheading 

8408.20.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the Senate of the United States, 

December 14, 2011. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 515) entitled ‘‘An Act to reauthorize the Belarus 

Democracy Act of 2004.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 6, line 19, strike ‘‘and’’ and insert ‘‘expanded 

2 its visa ban list, imposed additional financial sanctions on 

3 certain state-owned enterprises, and initiated preparations 

4 to freeze the assets of several individuals in Belarus. The’’. 

5 Ω2æOn page 10, line 9, strike ‘‘continue to’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 515 

AMENDMENTS
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 877    | 925    | 948   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,201  | 1,912  | 2,161  | 2,333  | 2,080  | 1,999  | 1,895  | 1,947  | 1,298  | 1,507 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,510  | 1,702  | 1,830  | 2,040  | 1,789  | 1,580  | 1,633  | 1,839  | 2,388  | 3,213 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,235  | 4,579  | 4,135  | 3,516  | 3,866  | 4,295  | 5,146  | 6,391  | 6,643  | 7,257 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,981  | 7,857  | 7,548  | 6,829  | 6,685  | 3,547  | 3,494  | 3,752  | 3,213  | 2,279 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,296  | 3,638  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EPA REGISTRATION 

NO.85806-2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 39 through 40 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__X__ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__ __ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Attorney-client privileged communication. 

__ __ Claimed confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

 

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please 

contact the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________ 
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 148 through 149 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5242 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5242

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid, tris (2-
                           ethylhexyl)ester).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid, tris (2-
                           ethylhexyl)ester).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)ESTER).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.62 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Phosphoric acid, tris (2-
ethylhexyl)ester)) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00108-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY/MOTION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY/MOTION HEARING by Zoom via a private link on June 21, 2022 at 01:30 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 138 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00546-CV

Drexel Evans, Appellant

v.

W&B Development, Ltd., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 290,963-B, HONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Drexel Evans seeks to appeal a final judgment that was signed on March

21, 2013. Evans did not file his notice of appeal until August 26, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1

(generally, notice of appeal in civil case must be filed within 30 days after judgment is signed).

On October 13, 2015, the Clerk of this Court sent a letter to Evans, stating that it

appeared that his notice of appeal was not timely filed and, as a result, that we lacked jurisdiction

over his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b) (filing of notice of appeal invokes appellate jurisdiction).

The Clerk requested that Evans provide proof to the Court that his notice of appeal was timely

mailed. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). The Clerk also notified Evans that, if he did not respond by

October 23, 2015, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

To date, Evans has not responded to the request. Accordingly, we dismiss the cause for want of

jurisdiction. See id.
__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: December 15, 2015

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

    To suspend temporarily the duty on man-made shells used in the 
                     manufacture of sleeping bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on man-made shells used in the 
                     manufacture of sleeping bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAN-MADE SHELLS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SLEEPING BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.63.07        Man-made shells     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          used in the                                                       12/31/2015
                          manufacture of
                          sleeping bags
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6307.90.98)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5098 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on AC electric motors of an 

output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 95 W. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on AC electric 

motors of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 

95 W. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEED4 ING 74.6 W BUT NOT EXCEEDING 95 W. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.85.08 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 AC electric motors of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not 

8 exceeding 95 W) is amended by striking the date in the 

9 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5098 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7258
In Re: CECIL EDWARD JACKSON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-261) Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cecil Edward Jackson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Cecil Edward Jackson filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The district court ruled on the motion by order entered on September 30, 2005. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant Jackson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED