alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Alabama Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Alabama Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 149    | 1      | 1      | 251    | 30     | 427    | 188    | 303    | 11     | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 270    | 586    | 11     | 373    | 2      | 181    | 44     | 485    | 84     | 313   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 15 
          - [ET Docket No. 99-231, FCC 00-312] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the effective date of the final rule which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 25, 2000 (65 FR 57557), regarding the Commission's rules for frequency hopping spread spectrum devices. The                         **DATES**                         section of the final is corrected as set forth below.                     

# DATES:

Effective October 25, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Neal L. McNeil, Office of Engineering and Technology, (202) 418-2408, TTY (202) 418-2989, e-mail: mcneil@fcc.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    As originally published, the                     **Federal Register**                     had an erroneous effective date. This document corrects that error.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-25015 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 03-10564

__________________________

AZTECA ENTERPRIZES, INC,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT,

Defendant - Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(No. 3:99-CV-281-M)

___________________________________________________

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Azteca Enterprizes, Inc. (“Azteca”), appeals the district court’s summary judgment

in favor of Dallas AreaRapid Transit(“DART”). Because we find no error with the district

court’s opinion, we affirm. 
2

This appeal concerns alleged discrimination during the awarding of a 1998 DART

contract for delivery of concrete cross-ties for use in DART’s lightrail line. Azteca argues

thatthe district court and the administrative law judge erred in finding thatAzteca did not

meet the requirements specified in DART’s solicitation and in the contract itself. The

administrative law judge’s thorough findings of fact were not clearly erroneous and we

see no reason to disturb the finding that Azteca was not a “responsible bidder” as required

by the contract. Azteca further argues that, under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1981 & 1983, it was

subjected to disparate treatment by DART and that the solicitation process had a disparate

impact on Hispanic contractors. Azteca’s disparate treatment claim fails because the other

bidders did meet the PCI certification requirement as specified in the solicitation and in

the contract, while Azteca did not meet thatrequirement. Azteca’s disparate impact claim

fails because Azteca provided no evidence that Hispanics experienced a disparate impact

as a result of DART’s 1998 cross-ties contracting process. 

For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
Southern California Edison Financial Data Schedule - Exhibit 27
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     $11,257,508
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     1,876,683
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,647,450
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        2,519,594
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,301,235      
<COMMON>                                        2,168,054     
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         225,703     
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             2,554,389     
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  4,948,146     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             275,000     
<PREFERRED>                                       183,755   
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            3,203,782     
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       1,295,000     
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                    344,485   
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     576,470   
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                               0   
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  6,474,597     
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  17,301,235      
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       3,539,433     
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              228,881     
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      2,847,544     
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      3,076,425     
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           463,008   
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  7,867   
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    470,875   
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          220,767   
<NET-INCOME>                                      250,108   
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        15,971    
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     234,137
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          345,360   
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         181,744   
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            978,573   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      $.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      $.0 
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Alaska Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Alaska Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,573  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 19     | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 51     | 0      | 1      | 161    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 777    | 39    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 67,242 | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
6 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

APPLIANCE COMPUTING III, INC.

d/b/a SUREFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v.

REDFIN CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-00376-ADA

ORDER APPROVING DEFENDANT’S AGREED AMENDED BILL OF COSTS AND 

STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF THE AWARD OF COSTS

Before the Court is the Agreed Bill of Costs submitted by Defendant Redfin Corporation

(“Defendant”) and agreed to by Plaintiff Appliance Computing III, Inc. d/b/a Surefield

(“Plaintiff”). The Court hereby approves the parties’ agreement as reflected in the Agreed Bill of 

Costs.

Further, before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Enforcement of the Award 

of Costs. Having reviewed the Motion and finding good cause exists, the Court hereby 

GRANTS the Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that enforcement of the award of costs shall be stayed 

until 30 days after this Court rules on Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of 

Law Pursuant to Rule 50(b) and its Motion for New Trial or to Alter or Amend the Judgment

(Dkts. 248 & 249). 

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 264-7 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 2
7 7

ORDERED this ______ day of ________________, 2022. 

____________________________________

ALAN D. ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 264-7 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 2
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. FR ANC ISC O M O RELOS-GR AC IDAS, a .k.a . Franc isc o M ore le s, a .k.a . Franc isc o M ore los, a .k.a . Franc isc o M o re losGonz a le z , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10358

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00025-R C C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R ane r C . C ollins, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 * * B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Franc isc o M o re los-Gra c ida s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 37-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for 

# FIL ED FEB 27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).atte m

pte d re e ntry

a fte r de p ortation, in viola tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . M ore los-Gra c ida s c onte nds tha t the distric t

c o urt e rre d by

fa iling to disc

uss its re a sons for de c lining to give him a downwa rd de pa rture or va

rianc e for c ultura l a ssim ila tion. W e do not re vie w this c la i m e x c e pt a s pa

rt of our re v ie w of the substa ntive re a s ona

ble ne ss of these nte nc e . Se eUnite d State s v . Vasque

z -C ruz , 692 F.3d 1001, 1004-08 (9th C ir. 2012), c e rt. de nie d , 134 S. C t. 76 (2013). C ontra ry to M ore los-Gra c ida s’ s argum e nt, the distric t c ourt did not a b use its disc re tion in im

posing his sente nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The be l ow-Guide line s se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte n c ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s , inc l uding M ore los-Gra c ida s ’ s c rim ina l a nd im m igration history . S

e e id. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 3 5 8 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT  11



STANDARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATIONCOMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(In thousands, except share information; unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Second quarter ended              Six months ended
                                                                        September 30                    September 30
                                                               ------------------------------  ------------------------------
<S> <C>
                                                                      2000            1999            2000            1999
                                                                  -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Income before extraordinary gain                                  $     5,017     $     2,210     $     6,705     $     3,472
                                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
Extraordinary gain                                                $       639     $         0     $       639     $         0
                                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
Net income applicable to common stock                             $     5,656     $     2,210     $     7,344     $     3,472
                                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
Basic average shares outstanding.............................      13,065,476      12,947,026      13,032,245      12,940,178

 Earnings per common share before extraordinary gain.........     $      0.38     $      0.17     $      0.51     $      0.27
 Extraordinary gain per common share.........................     $      0.05     $      0.00     $      0.05     $      0.00
 Net income per common share.................................     $      0.43     $      0.17     $      0.56     $      0.27
</TABLE>

Note: The incremental shares from assumed conversion of 7 1/4% convertible
subordinated debentures and the excise of outstanding stock options are not
included in computing the diluted per share amounts because the calculations
include adjustments which are antidilutive.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5032 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of cymoxanil and inert 

ingredients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of cymoxanil 

and inert ingredients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF CYMOXANIL AND INERT INGRE4 DIENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of cymoxanil 

(CAS No. 57966–95–7) 

and inert ingredients (provided for in subheading 

3808.92.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5032 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5152 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5152

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, 
            N, N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, 
            N, N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-BENZENEDICARBOXAMIDE, N, N'-BIS-(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-
              PIPERIDINYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, N, 
N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-170295 on Form S-8 and to the use of our report dated March 9, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of HudBay Minerals Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of
HudBay Minerals Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                          |  |                                             
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |  |                                             
|                          | 
|Toronto, Canada           |  |                                             
|March 31, 2011            |  | INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
|                          | 
|                          |  | LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS