alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5172 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5172

 To suspend temporarily the duty on necklaces or bracelets, other than 
 necklaces or bracelets containing jadeites or rubies, valued $10 each 
                               or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on necklaces or bracelets, other than 
 necklaces or bracelets containing jadeites or rubies, valued $10 each 
                               or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NECKLACES OR BRACELETS, OTHER THAN NECKLACES OR BRACELETS 
              CONTAINING JADEITES OR RUBIES, VALUED $10 EACH OR HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Necklaces or       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          bracelets, other                                                  12/31/2015
                          than necklaces or
                          bracelets
                          containing
                          jadeites or
                          rubies, valued
                          $10 each or
                          higher (provided
                          for in
                          7116.20.05)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T CORPORATION; 

AT&T SERVICES, INC., and 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00325-ADA 

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP dba VERIZON 

WIRELESS; VERIZON SERVICES CORP.; 

and VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK 

SERVICES, INC., 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00327-ADA 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF THE AT&T AND VERIZON DEFENDANTS TO STAY 

IN FAVOR OF THE FIRST-FILED CASE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY, 

DISMISS, OR TRANSFER UNDER THE FIRST-FILED RULE OR 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) 

BEFORE THE COURT is the Defendants AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., Verizon 

Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Services, Corp., and 

Verizon Business Network Services, Inc.’s Motion To Stay In Favor Of The First-Filed Case Or, In 

The Alternative, To Stay, Dismiss, Or Transfer Under The First-Filed Rule Or 28 U.S.C § 1404(a). 

The Court having considered the Motion and VoIP-Pal’s Notice of Consent to Granting Motion 

to 

Case 6:20-cv-00327-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

Dismiss under the First-Filed Rule, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be 

GRANTED. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned actions are DISMISSED without 

prejudice under the first-filed rule.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED this _______ day of _______________________, 2021. 

HONORABLE ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 1st April 

Case 6:20-cv-00327-ADA Document 49 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Alaska Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Alaska Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 825    | 0      | 13     | 0      | 0      | 79     | 0      | 5      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 171    | 0      | 271    | 34     | 1      | 26     | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service has prepared a Draft General Management Plan/Visitor Use and Facilities Plan and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DGMP/DEIS) for Voyageurs National Park. Because of strong public interest in the project, the comment period for this document has been extended an additional 30-days. 

# DATES:

The comment period will now end on October 23, 2000. All written comments should be postmarked by this date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Przybylski, Voyageurs National Park, 3131 Highway 53, International Falls, MN 56649, telephone: 218-283-9821. E-mail: Kathleen_Przybylski@nps.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

You may mail comments on the DMGP/DEIS to: General Management Plan, Voyageurs National Park, 3131 Highway 53, International Falls, MN 56649. You also may comment via e-mail to Kathleen_Przybylski@nps.gov. 

The purpose of the General Management Plan/Visitor Use and Facilities Plan is to set forth the basic management philosophy for the Park and to provide the strategies for addressing issues and achieving identified management objectives. The DGMP/DEIS describes and analyzes the environmental impacts of a proposed action and two action alternatives for the future management direction of the Park. A no action alternative is also evaluated. 

                    The initial Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice of availability for this document appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 23, 2000 (65 FR 39146). An amended EPA notice reflecting the first 30-day extension for public comment was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 11, 2000 (65 FR 49237).                 

September 22, 2000.

Catherine A. Damon,

Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region. 

[FR Doc. 00-25255 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-U
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.3


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


      THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF SECOND BANCORP CAPITAL TRUST I (the "Trust")
is being duly executed and filed by Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware banking
corporation, R.L. (Rick) Blossom, David L. Kellerman and Christopher Stanitz,
each an individual, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware
Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

1.    NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Second Bancorp
      Capital Trust I.

2.    DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the
      Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
      North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001,
      Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

3.    EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on
      AUGUST 29, 2001.
      ---------------

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as
trustee


By:  /s/ Kathleen A. Pedelini
   ------------------------------------

Name:    Kathleen A. Pedelini
     ----------------------------------

Title:  Administrative Account Manager
      ---------------------------------


      /s/ R.L. Blossom          , as Trustee
--------------------------------
Name: R.L. (Rick) Blossom


      /s/ David L. Kellerman    , as Trustee
--------------------------------
Name: David L. Kellerman



      /s/ Christopher Stanitz   , as Trustee
--------------------------------
Name:  Christopher Stanitz
#### LOPEZ v. STATE.

No. 25258.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1951.

See also, 225 S.W.2d 852.

Fryer & Milstead, El Paso, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the unlawful driving, while intoxicated, of a motor vehicle, with punishment assessed at a fine of $50.

The bills of exception and, this being a misdemeanor case, the statement of facts accompanying the record may not be considered, inasmuch as they were not filed within the statutory thirty-day period following adjournment of court, on December 30, 1950, at which this conviction was had, and no extension of time for such filing was granted. The record reflects that the bills were filed, as was the statement of facts, on February 14, 1951. Art. 760, C.C.P. (Sec. 5). Turner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 223 S.W.2d 236; Cadrin v. State, 129 Tex.Cr.R. 525, 89 S.W.2d 1001.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Daniel Morales, Respondent, v P.S. Elevator, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant P.S. Elevator, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated September 27, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellant.

The plaintiff, a busboy, sustained injuries when he slipped, apparently on spilled food, and fell down a staircase which connected a kitchen to a cafe one flight above. The staircase was being used by the plaintiff to transport food and drink between the kitchen and the cafe because the dumbwaiter normally used for that purpose was not working. The plaintiff commenced the instant action against, among others, the appellant P.S. Elevator, Inc., the company obligated to inspect and maintain the dumbwaiter. (The action against all defendants other than the appellant has been discontinued.) The appellant elevator company subsequently moved for summary judgment, and that motion was denied without prejudice to renew upon the completion of discovery. We reverse.

While the appellant can be charged with the duty of inspecting and maintaining the dumbwaiter in question, it clearly was not required to keep the staircase upon which the plaintiff fell free from debris. The plaintiff’s accident is simply too far removed from the orbit of the appellant’s duty to inspect and maintain the dumbwaiter to serve as a predicate for the imposition of liability (see, *Pulka v Edelman,*40 NY2d 781). Accordingly, the appellant is entitled to summary judgment.

The plaintiff’s contention that the motion for summary judgment is premature is without merit, as the plaintiff failed to set forth any reason to believe that additional discovery would reveal a relevant triable issue of fact *(see, Krinick v Sharac Rest.,*144 AD2d 440). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Deloitte & Touche LLP

First National Tower

1601 Dodge Street, Suite 3100

Omaha, Nebraska 69102-9706

Tel: (402) 346-7788

Fax: (402) 342-1920

www.deloitte.com

Deloitte

& Touche

 

 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors

Commercial Federal Bank
Omaha, Nebraska

We have examined management's assertion about Commercial Federal Bank's (the "Company") compliance with minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's*Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(USAP)**as of**and for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is**responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.***Deloitte & Touche LLP*
February 6, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 **
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50539 Summary Calendar

CARLOS SEGURA; JUAN A. GARCIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL MASON; DEBORAH BILLA; GENEVIEVE MANLEY; CYNTHIA J. HAHN; TIMOTHY REZNICEK; PHILIP V. JONES; JAMES DOE, One; JAMES DOE, Two; DELORES TORRES; J. M. LINDSEY, in his individual and official capacity; KAREN B. LINDSEY, Individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(No. 00-CV-229)

________________________________________________ April 24, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Having reviewed the parties’ briefs in light of the record excerpts and applicable authorities, we affirm for essentially the

same reasons contained in the magistrate judge’s report, as approved by the district court.2

AFFIRMED.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

DROPBOX, INC, 

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA

NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION

Dropbox, Inc. hereby notifies the Court that Dropbox and Motion Offense, LLC have 

agreed to extend the deadline for Dropbox, Inc. to file its response to Motion Offense’s Motion for 

New Trial Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 (Dkt. 442) and its response to Motion Offense’s Renewed 

Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) (Dkt. 443) to October 25, 2024. The 

parties have also agreed to extend Motion Offense’s corresponding reply deadlines to November 

15, 2024. The agreed extensions will not change the date of a hearing, trial or other Court event, 

and all other deadlines will remain in effect.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 445 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 3
2

October 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kelly Ransom

Kelly Ransom

Texas State Bar No. 24109427

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP

303 Colorado, Suite 2000

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel: (512) 495-6400

Kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com

Gregory H. Lantier (pro hac vice)

Amanda L. Major (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

2100 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington DC 20037

Tel: (202) 663-6327

Tel: (202) 663-6304

gregory.lantier@wilmerhale.com

amanda.major@wilmerhale.com

Liv Herriot (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400

Palo Alto, California 94306

Tel: (650) 858-6138

liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com

Makenzi G. Herbst (pro hac vice)

Rauvin A. Johl (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

60 State Street

Boston, MA 02109 

Tel: (617) 526-6171

Tel: (617) 526-6104

Tel: (617) 526-6109

makenzi.herbst@wilmerhale.com

rauvin.johl@wilmerhale.com

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 445 Filed 10/03/24 Page 2 of 3
3

Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Texas State Bar No. 07921800

GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P.

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Tel: (903) 934-8450

Fax: (903) 934-9257

gil@gillamsmithlaw.com

Attorneys for Dropbox, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on October 3, 2024.

/s/ Kelly Ransom

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 445 Filed 10/03/24 Page 3 of 3