alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in 

Civil and Criminal Cases, the following pleading has been filed. However, it is 

deficient in the area(s) checked below. Please correct the deficiency(ies), as 

noted below, and re-file document IMMEDIATELY. When re-filing document, 

other than a motion, please ensure you add ‘corrected’ to the docket text. If 

the document you are re-filing is a motion, select ‘corrected’ from the dropdown list. 

If an erroneous filing results in failure to meet a deadline, you will need 

to seek relief, for any default, from the presiding judge. 

(1) Other

 Remarks: Pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures Section 3g, with the exception of multiple motion

types, "...each filing must consist of only one pleading. Multiple pleadings...must be filed as separate documents." 

Your document contains a RESPONSE and a MOTION. Your MOTION has been filed. Please re-file you

RESPONSE separately.

United States District Court

Western District of Texas

Austin

Deficiency Notice

To:

From:

Date:

Re:

Biswas, Sanjay

Court Operations Department, Western District of Texas

Monday, June 28, 2021

01:20-CV-00298-LY / Doc # 124 / Filed On: 06/25/2021 05:35 PM CST

Case 1:20-cv-00298-LY-AWA Document 125 Filed 06/28/21 Page 1 of 1
----

----

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

----

Euroens vekselkurs (1)

12. juni 2006

(2006/C 138/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Kilde: Referencekurs offentliggjort af Den Europæiske Centralbank.

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.4227 — Umicore/Solvay/Solvicore JV)

Behandles eventuelt efter den forenklede procedure

(2006/C 138/02)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)EUT C 56 af 5.3.2005, s. 32.

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

INFOGATION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-0366-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER

AMENDED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

BASED ON OGP VERSION 3.2

Pursuant to Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court’s Standing Order 

Regarding Updated Order Governing Patent Proceedings – Patent Cases [D.I. 43], the Parties 

respectfully move for entry of the attached Amended [Proposed] Scheduling Order based on OGP 

Version 3.2 in the above captioned case.

Dated: November 18, 2020

By: /s/ Patricia Y. Ho

Michael C. Smith (SBN 18650410)

Siebman, Forrest, Burg & Smith LLP

113 East Austin Street

Marshall, TX 75670

michaelsmith@siebman.com

Telephone: 903-938-8900

Facsimile: 972-767-4620

Robert R. Brunelli (Admitted pro hac vice)

rbrunelli@sheridanross.com

Patricia Y. Ho (Admitted pro hac vice)

pho@sheridanross.com

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ J. Mark Mann 

J. Mark Mann

State Bar No. 12926150

mark@themannfirm.com

G. Blake Thompson

State Bar No. 24042033

blake@themannfirm.com

MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON

300 West Main Street

Henderson, Texas 75652

Telephone: 903/657-8540

Facsimile: 903/657-6003

Case 6:20-cv-00366-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 3
2

Matthew C. Holohan (Admitted pro hac vice)

mholohan@sheridanross.com

SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.

1560 Broadway, Suite 1200

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: 303-863-9700

Facsimile 303-863-0223

litigation@sheriddanross.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff InfoGation Corporation

Darin W. Snyder (pro hac vice)

dsnyder@omm.com

David S. Almeling (pro hac vice)

dalmeling@omm.com 

Mark Liang (pro hac vice)

mliang@omm.com

Bess Ibtisam Hanish (pro hac vice)

bhanish@omm.com

Daniel Silverman (pro hac vice)

dsilverman@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

GOOGLE LLC

Case 6:20-cv-00366-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this November 18, 2020, with a copy of this document via electronic 

mail.

Dated: November 18, 2020 /s/ J. Mark Mann 

 J. Mark Mann

Case 6:20-cv-00366-ADA Document 44 Filed 11/18/20 Page 3 of 3
# Euroopan unionin C 128A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-261X |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 128A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 49. vuosikerta1. kesäkuu 2006 |

ISSN 1725-261X

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 128A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

49. vuosikerta1. kesäkuu 2006

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | CEPOL |
| 2006/C 128A/1 | Työhönottoilmoitus | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

CEPOL

2006/C 128A/1

Työhönottoilmoitus

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

CEPOL

| 1.6.2006 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2006

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 128/1

---

TYÖHÖNOTTOILMOITUS

(2006/C 128 A/01)

Etsimme hyvin koulutettua, vankan johtajakokemuksen omaavaa ammattilaista, jolla on myös koulutusalan tuntemusta, johtamaan Yhdistyneessä kuningaskunnassa Hampshiren Bramshillissä sijaitsevaa sihteeristöä.

JOHTAJA

CEPOL, Euroopan yhteisöjen elin, kouluttaa Euroopan unionin alueen ylempiä poliisiviranomaisia. Johtajan tehtävänä on johtaa sihteeristöä, joka tarjoaa koulutuksellista, hallinnollista, taloudellista ja logistista tukea. Sihteeristöön kuuluu 22 jäsentä.

Viranhaltija on vastuussa tuen ja neuvojen antamisesta puheenjohtajalle sekä hallintoneuvoston ja komiteoiden jäsenille. Hän vastaa vuotuisen työohjelman sekä vuosibudjetin ja -raportin laatimisesta. Hän neuvottelee yhteistyösopimuksista ja edustaa CEPOLia asiaankuuluvissa valvonta- ja koulutusfoorumeissa.

EU:n henkilöstösääntöjen mukaisesti hakijan pitää muun muassa olla jonkin EU:n jäsenvaltion kansalainen ja hänellä pitää olla perusteellinen kielitaito yhdessä yhteisön kielessä ja riittävä kielitaito toisessa yhteisön kielessä. Menestyneille hakijoille suoritetaan paikallinen turvallisuustutkimus.

Lisätietoja hakemusmenettelystä löytyy osoitteesta www.cepol.net. Tehtävää koskevat tiedustelut tulee osoittaa sähköpostitse osoitteeseen: janos.fehervary@bmi.gv.at.

| CEPOL-SIHTEERISTÖ |
| --- |
| CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom |
| Puhelin (44-1256) 60 26 68; faksi (44-1256) 60 29 96 |
| Kotisivu: www.cepol.net |

CEPOL-SIHTEERISTÖ

CEPOL House, Bramshill, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 0JW, United Kingdom

Puhelin (44-1256) 60 26 68; faksi (44-1256) 60 29 96

Kotisivu: www.cepol.net

---
|                                                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                         
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                         
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 28     | 0      | 16     | 41     | 0      | 1      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3      | 0      | 37     | 8      | 0      | 0      | 17     | 4      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32



Standard Commercial Corporation

Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,

United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Standard Commercial Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Robert E. Harrison
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           | 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Robert E. Harrison Chief Executive
Officer



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Robert A. Sheets
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         | 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Robert A. Sheets Chief Financial
Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



-29-
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopsmith, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Folkerth,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

February 10, 2003                   By: /s/ John Folkerth
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 32
#### DRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 25631.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1952.

*245Jack Nossaman, Sherman, for appellant.

Murray H. Nance, Jr., County Atty., Sherman, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary upon 'his conviction for assault with intent to murder.

The statement of facts in this case, in question and answer form, consists of 372 pages with an additional 127 pages taken on his motion for a new trial. The statement of facts prepared by the reporter does not contain an index of the. bills of exception taken, as provided for by Article 759a, Sec. 3, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Acts of 52nd Legislature, Chapter 465, p. 819. For this reason we are not required to consider any questions of admission of evidence in the trial of the case except such as come to us by formal bills. See Greenwood v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 246 S.W.2d 191.

The chief question presented for reversal of thi9 case complains of the misconduct of the jury, which is brought to us in appellant’s Bill of Exception No. 1. This bill is in compliance with the requirements set forth in Article 760e, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The complaint is that the jury, after having retired to deliberate on their verdict, received other testimony from a juror who said that the defendant was a bootlegger and hoodlum in the town of Denison. The jurors were summoned on the hearing and three of them testified directly that a member of the jury, in discussing the matter with fellow jurors in the room, while the matter was being generally discusséd but before a foreman was selected, told them that the defendant was a bootlegger and a hoodlum in the town of Denison. Other jurors placed on the witness stand by the state said they did not'hear such statement, though some of them did remember hearing the word “bootlegger” used. Their testimony to that extent verifies the evidence of the three jurors. All jurors were cross-examined carefully and each admitted that he was not in position to say that it did not occur. The court examined most of these jurors and the record was closed with the fact well established that some one made the charge, even though it was not heard by all. There was no denial and no issue of fact for the court to decide. We cannot speculate as to the injury resulting from such statement. The motion for new trial should have 'been granted.

For the failure of the court to do so, the judgment of the trial court is now reversed and the cause remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5271 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5271

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydroxylamine sulfate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydroxylamine sulfate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDROXYLAMINE SULFATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Hydroxylamine       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          sulfate (CAS No.                                                  12/31/2015
                          10039-54-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2825.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

KENNETH BELL et al, )

on behalf of themselves and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:20-CV-00461

)

CAL-MAINE FOODS et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF THE KROGER CO.

Plaintiffs hereby notify the court of the voluntary dismissal without prejudice 

of The Kroger Co. This dismissal is pursuant to Rule 41(A)(1)(a)(i) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, as this defendant has neither answered nor filed a motion 

for summary judgment. 

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of July, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alexander McSwain

ATTORNEY

THE CARLSON LAW FIRM

Texas State Bar No: 24106292

100 E. Central Texas Expy

Killeen, TX 76541

Telephone: (800) 359-5690

Facsimile: (254) 526-8204

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 54 Filed 07/03/20 Page 1 of 2
E-Mail: 

amcswain@carlsonattorneys.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Court’s electronic filing 

system (CM/ECF) which serves copies to all counsel of record on July 3, 2020. 

/s/ Alexander McSwain

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:20-cv-00461-RP Document 54 Filed 07/03/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5081 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion-exchange resin-Methanamine, N 

Methyl reaction products with chloromethylated divinylbenzene-styrene 

polymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion-exchange resinMethanamine, N Methyl reaction products with 

chloromethylated divinylbenzene-styrene polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ION-EXCHANGE RESIN-METHANAMINE, N 

4 METHYL REACTION PRODUCTS WITH 

5 CHLOROMETHYLATED DIVINYLBENZENE-STY6 RENE POLYMER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5081 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ion-exchange resinMethanamine, N Methyl 

reaction products with 

chloromethylated 

divinylbenzene-styrene 

polymer, (CAS No. 68441– 

29–2) (provided for in subheading 3914.00.60) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 17
- 00694
- CR

Jerel Smith, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TR AVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 16
- 301628 , THE HONORABLE CLIF FORD A. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The State’s brief was originally due June 14, 2018. On counsel’s mot ions , the time for filing was extended to September 14, 2018

. The State’s counsel has now filed a fourth motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief. We grant the motion for
extension of time and order the State to file a brief no later than October 15, 2018. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the case being
submitted t o this Court on the appellant’s brief alone.

It is ordered on September 19, 2018

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
Do Not Publish
#### Ex parte HANNEN.

No. 24800.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, States Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The original opinion erroneously referred to the punishment shown by the judgment in evidence as 2 to 5 years. We should have said 2 to 10 years.

The State’s motion for rehearing alleges that the judgment actually rendered by the trial court and entered in its minutes assessed the punishment of Relator at 10 years in the penitentiary.

*237, On May 3, 1950, the .mandate issued herein was recalled by this court, and on May 10, 1950,' after submission of the State’s motion for rehearing, an order was issued directing the judge of the trial court to ascertain the true facts as to the indictment, and as to the judgment and orders entered of record in Cause No. 5338, in which Relator was convicted of embezzlement.

The findings of the trial court are now before us, and it appears therefrom that the judgment rendered by the trial court was entered on the minutes of the court by the. clerk on February 26, 1948, showing the punishment assessed to be “not less than two nor more than ten years.” That on February 28, ■ 1948, and during the same term of court, the minutes were corrected .so as to show the punishment *assessed. to*be ten .years instead of not less than 2 nor more than 10 years. That at the time the minutes were -signed and approved on February 28, 1948,. the judgment as entered correctly showed the punishment actually assessed by the judge, which was ten years in the penitentiary.

It was the right and duty of the trial judge to correct as well as to sign the minutes on adjournment of the term. See Rule 20, Texas R.C.P.

It appears that in this, as in other records that have come to our attention, the carelessness of officers of- the court in their use of incorrectly printed forms, 'have become the basis of many fruitless efforts of convicts to secure, their release from the penitentiary. Purported copies of judgments and orders as they appear in the court’s minutes should not be certified as correct without a careful check.

It now appears that Relator is legally restrained under a valid conviction.

The State’s motion for rehearing is therefore granted, and the former opinion granting the writ conditionally is set aside.

And Relator’s application for release’ or discharge is now denied.

Opinion approved by the Court.