alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 11     | 13     | 38     | 20     | 61     | 15     | 16     | 6     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 0      | 136    | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 113    | 45     | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 31     | 34     | 117    | 146    | 166    | 114    | 262    | 202    | 383   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 97     | 63     | 134    | 80     | 215    | 32     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 12
- 00298
- CR EX PARTE JAMES MANGU M

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011
- 2513
- C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Mangum has filed a pre

- trial petition for writ of habeas corpus. His complaint is that the trial court denied motions made by his appointed counsel and himself to have the appointed counsel replaced with another appointed counsel. While we note a number of procedural problems with the petition, which are noted below, w e use Rule 2 to expedite the disposition of this proceeding. 1 T EX

. R. A PP
. P. 2. As to the merits of the petition, however, Mangum’s complaint is really nothing more than an attempt to have a review of an interlocutory order. He has not asserted or

1 Mangum’s petition does not follow the appellate rule on original proceedings in the appellate court. There is no identification of the parties, no tab le of contents, no index of authorities, no statement of jurisdiction, no issues presented, and no clear and concise argument. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.3. There is no certification, and the documents attached to the petition do not show that they are certi fied or sworn to. Id . (j), (k); 52.7. Further, the petition for w rit of h abeas c orpus was not served. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties to the proceeding and must contain proper proof of service. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5(a).Ex parte Mangum Page 2

shown an unconstitutional restraint of his person that would invoke this Court’s very limited constitutional jurisdiction of a writ of habeas corpus. See Ramirez v. State , 36 S.W.3d 660, 664 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2001, pet. ref’d) (no original jurisdiction of any

cr iminal habeas corpus proceeding); T EX

. C ONST . art. V § 6 (courts of appeals shall have such other jurisdiction, original and appellate, as may be prescribed by law). See also Ex parte Schmidt , 109 S.W.3d 480, 482 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (when a trial court has jurisdiction to issue a writ and denies relief, the denial can be appealed). Therefore, we dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 23, 2012 Do not publish [OT06]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         209,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,135,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,127,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,162,000
<PP&E>                                     154,004,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              42,192,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,852,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,387,000
<BONDS>                                     28,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,000
<COMMON>                                        42,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,953,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,852,000
<SALES>                                     36,103,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,103,000
<CGS>                                       26,574,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,353,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (252,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                66,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,506,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,532,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,013,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,519,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,519,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
```
**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                             ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Quarterly Report"), of Southern California Edison Company (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 7, 2004

                                                      /s/ Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      ---------------------------------------------
                                                      Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

                                                      /s/ W. James Scilacci
                                                      ---------------------------------------------
                                                      W. James Scilacci
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Komisjoni teatis, mis on seotud nõukogu 21. detsembri 1988. aasta direktiivi 89/106/EMÜ (ehitustooteid puudutavate liikmesriikide õigus- ja haldusnormide ühtlustamise kohta) rakendamisega

(2006/C 134/01)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

(Direktiivi kohaste ühtlustatud standardite pealkirjade ja viidete avaldamine)

Märkus:

Põhjalikumat teavet ühtlustatud standardite kohta võib leida Internetilehelt

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)

(2)  Kooseksisteerimisperioodi lõpu tähtaeg on samane harmoneeritud standardiga vastuolus oleva rahvusliku tehnilise kirjelduse kehtetuks tunnistamise tähtajaga, pärast mida toote nõuetele vastavuse tõendamise aluseks on harmoneeritud Euroopa tehniline kirjeldus (harmoneeritud standard või Euroopa tehniline tunnustus)

(3)  Muudatuste puhul on viitestandard EN CCCCC: AAAA, vajaduse korral selle varasemad muudatused ja osutatud uus muudatus.

(4)  Euroopa Komisjon algatas nõukogu direktiivi 89/106/EMÜ artikli 5 lõike 1 alusel menetluse kustutamaks väljaandest viited kõnealusele standardile.

(5)EÜT L 204, 21.7.1998, lk 37.

(6)EÜT L 217, 5.8.1998, lk 18.

----
#### FLOURNOY v. STATE.

No. 26192.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.
Cendant Mortgage 

3000 Leadenhall Road

Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

CENDANT 

Mortgage

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Cendant Mortgage Corporation (the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $120 million and $20 million, respectively.

 

Cendant Mortgage Corporation

 

Terence W. Edwards

Terence W. Edwards

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Mark Danahy

Mark Danahy

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Martin L. Foster

Martin L. Foster

Senior Vice President- Loan Servicing
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-
OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Phillip C. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael R. Jorgensen, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DOBI Medical
International, Inc.

Dated May 26, 2005

                                    /s/ Phillip C. Thomas
                                    ---------------------
                                    Phillip C. Thomas
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Michael R. Jorgensen
                                    ------------------------
                                    Michael R. Jorgensen
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer
Exhibit 11.1
                            AMERICAN STORES COMPANY
                       Calculation of Earnings Per Share
                                  (unaudited)
                     (in thousands, except per share data)


                                                        Thirteen Weeks Ended


                                                    May 3,              May 4,
                                                     1997                1996

Primary Earnings Per Share

Primary earnings applicable to shareholders       $ 34,225              $ 64,240

Primary earnings per share                           $0.24                 $0.44

Average shares outstanding                         143,119               146,326



Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share

Fully diluted earnings applicable to shareholders $ 34,225              $ 64,240

Fully diluted earnings per share                 $0.24 (1)             $0.44 (1)

Fully diluted average shares outstanding           144,267               146,847

Calculation of Fully Diluted Average Shares Outstanding

Effect of assumed exercise of stock options:


Proceeds from assumed exercise                    $155,855              $ 41,190

Shares under options outstanding                     4,536                 1,779
Shares assumed acquired with proceeds
  under the treasury stock method                   (3,388)              (1,258)

Incremental shares due to assumed
  exercise of stock options                          1,148                   521


Fully diluted average shares outstanding:

Average shares outstanding                         143,119               146,326
Assumed exercise of stock options                    1,148                   521


      Total                                        144,267               146,847


(1)  Dilution is less than 3%.
#### Ex parte DYE.

No. 25940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1952.

W. E. Pinkston, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Relator seeks by this original application to secure his release from a judgment of conviction in the District Court of Kaufman County, Texas, wherein he was sentenced to 20 years in the penitentiary.

An appeal was taken from such conviction to this court and, before the same was heard, the appellant escaped and was thereafter arrested and returned to jail. An application was filed in his appeal setting up the facts and asking that the appeal be dismissed. The application was heard and the appeal was dismissed. See Dye v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 249 S.W.2d 202.

The same question is attempted to be raised in this application which was passed upon in that appeal as raised by the contention that, in as much as the appellant was not at large on his escape for a period of ten days, the escape would not work a dismissal of the appeal. We have passed on the question in that case and the same is decisive of the question now before us.

Other questions were raised in that appeal which could not be considered because of his escape and the subsequent dismissal of the case. He cannot now bring an appeal of such questions to this court and his application for the writ is denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.6c


[INFOGRAMES LETTERHEAD]                                        [INFOGRAMES LOGO]



Denis Guyennot
President



December 21, 2000



Mr. Harry Rubin
784 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10021



Dear Harry:



I am very pleased to offer you the position of Senior Executive Vice President
for Infogrames, Inc.

The purpose of this letter is to confirm the terms and conditions of our
employment offer to you.

*  As discussed, your annual salary will be $300,000.00, effective January 1,
   2001, paid to you in equal installments; currently our practice is to pay on
   a semi-monthly basis.

*  As a full-time employee you will be entitled to participate in all of our
   standard benefit plans.

*  You will also be paid a car allowance of $2,500 a month, effective January 1,
   2001.

*  You are also eligible to participate in the Corporate Executive Incentive
   Bonus Plan at 50%, without any proration.

*  You are entitled to 6 months severance, if involuntarily terminated for
   reasons other than cause, within the first two years of your employment.
   After the first two years of your employment, you will participate in the
   company severance policy that is in effect.

By signing this letter you confirm that you are not subject to any agreement
(with a prior employer or otherwise) which would prohibit, limit or otherwise
be inconsistent with your employment at Infogrames, Inc. During your employment
with Infogrames, Inc., you agree that you will not use or disclose any
confidential or proprietary information of any third party, including any prior
employer.

Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing this letter where
indicated and returning it to me.

Sincerely,

/s/ (illegible)
-----------------------

Accepted and agreed to:

By: /s/ Harry Rubin                 12/21/00
    ---------------                 --------
        Harry Rubin                   Date
#### Frank REED, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27162.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1954.

No appearance for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*364PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the sale of whisky-in a dry area; the punishment, $250 fine.

The record contains no notice of appeal, in the absence of which we are without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 3, 2015

p0 331 

# Order

Clerk April 3, 2015

149998

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149998

COA: 321375

Kent CC: 13

- 003123

- FC

GLENN ROBERT DAVIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 11, 2014 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)( 1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence imposed by the Kent Circuit Court,

and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. The trial court erred in

scoring Offense Variable 11 at 50 points in the absence of evidence tha t any additional

penetrations “arose out of” the sentencing offense. See MCL 777.41; People v Johnson

, 474 Mich 96 (2006).
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  October 17, 2006
Exhibit
23.2


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have
issued our report dated March 28, 2008 on Vortech, LLC and VTC, LLC, with
respect to the combined financial statements and schedule for the period from
January 1, 2007 to January 19, 2007 included in the Annual Report of Fortress
International Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Fortress International Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-142906, effective May 14, 2007), Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-123504, effective May 18, 2007) and Registration Statement Form
S-3 (File No. 333-154174, effective October 27, 2008).




/s/
      Grant Thornton LLPBaltimore,
      MarylandMarch
      31,
2009