alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, SimonBraeutigam, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Chase Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National Association. 

Date: March 30, 2022 

 

By:
 
/s/ Simon Braeutigam

Name:
 
Simon Braeutigam

Title:
 
Chief Executive Officer
 (senior officer of Chase Card Funding LLC in charge of securitization)**
Order entered December 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01723-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

ROBIN LOPEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02070

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 19, 2013 “unopposed motion to lift automatic stay to 

finalize settlement in trial court and abate interlocutory appeal.” We ORDER the automatic stay 

lifted and ABATE the appeal. The appeal will be reinstated February 3, 2014 or upon motion by 

the parties, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5035 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain magnetic snaps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain magnetic snaps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MAGNETIC SNAPS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.96.06 Magnetic snaps used as a 

component part of finished 

leather goods (provided for 

in subheading 9606.10.80) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5035 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Dry Natural Gas Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Dry Natural Gas Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 162    | 224    | 288    | 361    | 544    | 565    | 711    | 1,099 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,165  | 1,334  | 1,328  | 1,513  | 1,222  | 1,069  | 1,086  | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RAFFAELE MOSCA,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4174

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 27, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Orange County,

Greg A. Tynan, Judge.

Raffaele Mosca, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court summarily denied Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for postconviction 

relief. We affirm the summary disposition on claim three regarding vindictive sentencing,

but we reverse the summary disposition on claims one and two related to the plea offer. 

On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on claims one and two.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

TORPY, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.
-----"Washburn, Anne" <Anne.Washburn@PacifiCorp.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Washburn, Anne" <Anne.Washburn@PacifiCorp.com> Date: 07/09/2010 01:49PM cc: "Dugan, Alan" <Alan.Dugan@PacifiCorp.com>, "Tripp, Rick" <Rick.Tripp@PacifiCorp.com>, "Lawson, Bill" <Bill.Lawson@PacifiCorp.com>, "Doak, James" <James .Doak@PacifiCorp.com> Subject: Request for Extension of Effluent Guidelin e Questionnaire

Ms. Alicea,

Please find the attached request for extension of the due date for our re sponse to the Effluent Guideline Questionnaire. In summa ry, we received the questionnaire June 18, 2010, and we are requesting a 30-day ex tension for a due date of October 16, 2010.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Anne Washburn

Environmental Analyst

Dave Johnston Plant

Phone: 307-995-5055

Fax: 307-995-5025



#  Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This e-mail, and attached files, may co ntain attorney-cli ent confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibit ed. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender b y reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0419DO

...
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Citadel Broadcasting Corporation (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Farid Suleman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    FARID SULEMAN   
|Farid Suleman          
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and will be retained by Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### McKenzie v. State.

No. 26607.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 25, 1953.

Martin & Shown, by W. E. Martin, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The indictment in this case charged in a single count the driving of an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, which is an offense of the grade of a misdemeanor, under the provisions of Art. 802, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. There was the further allegation, in connection therewith, that appellant, before the commission of that offense, had been convicted of an offense of the same character. The two allegations, together, charged the felony offense of driving an automobile while intoxicated, as denounced by Art. 802b, Vernon’s Ann. P.C.

The case came on for trial in the Criminal District Court of Harris County and, upon the trial thereof, the state did not establish the allegation of a prior conviction. The trial court submitted to the jury only the ■ primary or misdemeanor offense charged in the indictment. The jury convicted of that offense and assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in jail for thirty days.

It is insisted that when the state failed to establish the allegation of prior conviction, the trial court lost jurisdiction of the case and was authorized to do nothing more than to transfer the case to the County Court at Law of Harris County, the court having jurisdiction over the misdemeanor offense of drunk driving.

It is insisted that the judgment is sustainable for either of two reasons, which are: (a) The Criminal District Court of Harris County has jurisdiction of misdemeanors, and (b) the misdemeanor offense of drunk driving was an offense included within the allegation of the indictment.

If either of these contentions be correct, the judgment is valid.

Art. 694, C.C.P., authorizes a conviction for a lower offense which is included within the offense that is the basis of the prosecution.

In the case of Tomlin v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 207, 233 S.W.2d 303, 304, in determining what constitutes an included offense within the meaning of Art. 694, C.C.P., the rule is stated as follows:

> “The rule appears to be that where the offense charged is not within the *563provisions of said Article 695, C.C.P., in order to warrant a conviction for a lesser offense than that charged in an indictment, it is necessary that every constituent element of the lesser offense be alleged in the indictment, and. that there be no repugnancy between the constituent elements of the lesser offense and those . of the offense charged.” ■ •

We are constrained to conclude that the above rule is applicable and controlling, here, where the misdemeanor offense of drunk driving is not only included within the allegations of the indictment but is a constituent element of the felony offense charged, without which the felony offense does not exist.

The trial court was not without jurisdiction to render the judgment appealed from.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### CUELLAR v. STATE.

No. 23821.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1947.

Fred Kowalski,, of Brownsville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The indictment charged appellant with the nighttime burglary of the private residence of John E. Oaks. There was also a count charging a prior conviction of an offense of like character.

Appellant waived trial by jury and pleaded guilty before the court. The proceedings touching the entry and receipt of a plea of guilty before the court are regular. The trial court fixed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for life. Neither the judgment nor sentence shows that the count charging a prior conviction entered into the punishment so fixed.

*251 The statute (Art. 1391, P.C.) fixes the punishment for nighttime burglary of a private residence at confinement in the penitentiary for “any term not less than five years.” This means that the punishment must be fixed at a term of years. Life imprisonment in the penitentiary is not for a term of years and is authorized only when the penalty fixed by statute so provides. See Ex parte Pruitt, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 438, 141 S.W.2d 333; Square v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 493, 154 S.W.2d 852.

The court having fixed a punishment n'ot authorized, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 32-16 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
October 19, 2015

Mr. Eric Grussendorf

Grussendorf Nursery Inc.

4124 Midway Road

Hermantown, MN 55811

Dear Mr. Grussendorf :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your July 21, 2015, and August 5, 2015 exemption request s filed in D ocket

No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3075 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition

does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the pu blic as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
<TABLE>
                       SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               Dollars in Millions


<CAPTION>
                                           SIX MONTHS ENDED 
                                                JUNE 30,                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                          ---------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                             1997        1996        1996       1995         1994         1993         1992
                                          ---------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
Income Before Income Taxes,
Extraordinary
   Loss and Cumulative Effect of          $    996    $  1,114   $   2,168   $   1,688    $   1,586   $    1,424   $    1,325
   Changes
     Add:Interest Expense                      169         163         327         340          358          385          409
         1/3 Rental Expense                     19          15          33          26           25           23           27
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Earnings                    $  1,184    $  1,292   $   2,528   $   2,054    $   1,969   $    1,832   $    1,761
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Total Interest Charges                    $    181    $    174   $     348   $     340    $     358   $      385   $      409
1/3 Rental Expense                              19          15          33          26           25           23           27
                                          ---------   ---------  ----------  ----------   ----------  -----------  -----------

     Adjusted Fixed Charges               $    200    $    189   $     381   $     366    $     383   $      408   $      436
                                          =========   =========  ==========  ==========   ==========  ===========  ===========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            5.92        6.84        6.64        5.61         5.14         4.49         4.04
</TABLE>
|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          
|New Mexico - East Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                          
|New Mexico - East Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 238    | 39     | 88     | 50     | 122    | 125    | 205    | 113    | 118    | 64    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 101    | 243    | 23     | 4      | 124    | 15     | 126    | 37     | 335   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 125    | 335    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amended Annual Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shouren Zhao, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented.








Date: February 25, 2011
By: /s/Shouren Zhao

Shouren Zhao

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer