alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5224 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5224

 To suspend temporarily the duty on hand operated globe type valves of 
steel, having an opening approximately 7.62 cm. or more in diameter and 
    certified by the importer as meeting ASME B16.34 certification 
        requirements as approved for use in nuclear facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on hand operated globe type valves of 
steel, having an opening approximately 7.62 cm. or more in diameter and 
    certified by the importer as meeting ASME B16.34 certification 
        requirements as approved for use in nuclear facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAND OPERATED GLOBE TYPE VALVES OF STEEL, HAVING AN OPENING 
              APPROXIMATELY 7.62 CM. OR MORE IN DIAMETER AND CERTIFIED 
              BY THE IMPORTER AS MEETING ASME B16.34 CERTIFICATION 
              REQUIREMENTS AS APPROVED FOR USE IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Hand operated       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        globe type valves                                                  31/2015.......
                        of steel, having
                        an opening
                        approximately
                        7.62 cm. or more
                        in diameter and
                        certified by the
                        importer as
                        meeting ASME
                        B16.34
                        certification
                        requirements as
                        approved for use
                        in nuclear
                        facilities
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8481.80.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 471 (Rev. 01/09) Order to Detain a Defendant Temporarily Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(d)

United States District Court

for the

Western District of Texas

United States of America

v.

(1) Allen Forrest Cook

NO: AU:20-CR-00077(1)-LY

ORDER TO DETAIN A DEFENDANT TEMPORARILY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3142(d)

 At the time of the alleged offense, the defendant was not a United States citizen or a person

lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or, alternatively, the defendant was on release pending trial

for a state or federal felony; on release after conviction for any type of offense, state or federal; or on

probation or parole. This court finds that the defendant, if released, may flee or pose a danger to another

person or the community.

IT IS ORDERED: The defendant must be detained temporarily under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(d) until

1/6/2020. I further order that a X detention hearing and n/a a preliminary hearing be held

on January 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM before the Honorable Susan Hightower. Connection instructions will

be e-mailed to counsel of record in advance of the hearing.

 The attorney for the government is directed to notify the appropriate court, probation or parole

officer, state or local law enforcement officer, or the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

so that a detainer may be placed on the defendant or custody may be transferred. If no action is taken by

the above date, the defendant must be brought before this court on that date for further proceedings.

 If defendant chooses to waive hearing, a written waiver (see attached) must be signed by

defendant and his/her counsel and filed by 4:00 p.m. the day before scheduled hearing.

______________________________

Signed and Entered this ANDREW W. AUSTIN

21st day of December, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cr-00077-LY Document 60 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

(1) Allen Forrest Cook

Case Number: AU:20-CR-00077(1)-LY

 Defendant

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF DETENTION HEARING

 Defendant, (1) Allen Forrest Cook, files this response to the Notice of Detention Hearing

which was issued by the Court. After further investigation, Defendant wishes at this time to

waive his/her right to the detention hearing, subject to his/her right to bring a motion concerning

detention at a later date.

Respectfully submitted,

Defendant

Date Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was hand 

delivered to the Assistant United States Attorney on the day of , 20 .

Allen Forrest Cook

Attorney for Defendant

Case 1:20-cr-00077-LY Document 60 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2
Placeholder: confidential business information item 

CBI Memo from ICF International on 1-10-12 

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by 

email at donaldson.david@epa.gov.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 4      | 1     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 42     | 12     | 10     | 2      | 31     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 10     | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 0      | 11     | 11     | 57     | 0      | 12     | 1      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 7      | 5      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 110    | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 13     | 16     | 0      | 39     | 0      | 2      | W      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors and the Stockholders of Gladstone Investment Corporation: 

We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of assets andliabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of Gladstone Investment Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changesin net assets and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2019, including the related notes, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2019, and inour report dated May 13, 2019, we expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements ofassets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of March 31, 2017, March 31, 2016, March 31, 2015, March 31, 2014, March 31, 2013, March 31, 2012, March 31, 2011, and March 31,2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2016, March 31, 2015, March 31, 2014, March 31, 2013, March 31, 2012, March 31, 2011, andMarch 31, 2010 (none of which are presented herein), and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the senior securities table of the Selected ConsolidatedFinancial Data of Gladstone Investment Corporation and its subsidiaries for each of the ten years in the period ended March 31, 2019, appearing on pages 43-44 in Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial statements from which it has been derived. 

 
**/s**/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMcLean, VAMay 13, 2019**
April 30, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM WADE BARTLET T , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00058

- CV V.

LORI LEE BARTLETT , Appellee

______ __________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Lori Lee Bartlett, signed October 22, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the ju dgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, William Wade Bartlett , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# San 

# loaquin Valley 

# TM HEATTHY

# AIR LIVINGArR 

### P0ttuTt0t{ cflt{TRflt DtsTRtcT February 

### 4,2015 Mr. Mike 

### Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section California 

### Air Resources Board P.O. Box 

### 2815 Sacramento, 

### CA 95812 Dear 

### Mr. Guzzetta Attached is

### the Rule

### Action Package 

### for Rule

### 4905 (Natural 

### Gas-fired, Fan-Type 

### central Furnaces) 

### adopted by

### the District's Governing Board 

### on January22, 

### 2015. We request 

### the California 

### Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit 

### this rule and

### theappropriate documentation to

### the United 

### States Environmental Protection 

### Agency (EPA) 

### asa revision to

### the

### state lmplementation Plan. 

### lncluded in

### this Rule

### Action Package are the following: 

### ARB SIP 

### Completeness Checklist ARB 

### APCD/AQMD Rule 

### Evaluation Form Clean copy 

### of Rule 4905 Underline/Strikeout Copy 

### of Rule4905 

### Governing Board Resolution 

### Governing Board Memo Evidence 

### of Public Hearing Final 

### Staff Report 

### with appendices lf

### you have any 

### questions, please contact 

### Jesse Madsen 

### at (559) 230-6100 

### or by e-mail at

### Jesse.Madsen@valleyair.org. The District 

### thanksyou and 

### your staff 

### for your assistance.

Sheraz Gill Director 

### of Strategies 

### and lncentives 

### Attachments

Seyed Sadredin Executive DirectolÂir Pollution Control 0lf icer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

# I

fllorthern Region 4800 Enterprise Way Modesto, CA 95356.8718 TeL (2091 557.6400 FAX: (2091 557.6475 Central Region (Moin 0fficol 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Fresno, CA 93726.0244 TeL 1559) 230.6000 FAX: (5591 230.6061 Southern legion 34946 Flyover Court Bakerslield, CA 93308.9725 Tsh 681.392.5500 FAX: 661.302.5585 www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Pinr.dddyclodp¡ps, Íl
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5088 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5088

   To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 4-Bromobenzyl Bromide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 4-Bromobenzyl Bromide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-BROMOBENZYL BROMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4-Bromobenzyl       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Bromide (CAS No.                                                  12/31/2015
                          589-15-1)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2903.89.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 11502]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-22]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

18 CFR Part 410

 
Schedule of Water Charges; Correction

AGENCY: Delaware River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of February 19, 2010, amending the 
schedule of water charges. This correction clarifies that the amended 
rates are proposed to take effect in two stages, on January 1, 2011 and 
January 1, 2012, respectively, and not on January 1, 2010 and January 
1, 2011 as stated in the preamble.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Pamela M. Bush, 609-477-7203.
    Correction: In proposed rule FR Doc. 2010-3219, beginning on page 
7411 in the issue of February 19, 2010, make the following correction 
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. On page 7412 in the second 
column, in the second full paragraph, replace the text following the 
colon on the sixth line of the paragraph with the following:
    ``The consumptive use rate is proposed to be increased from $60 to 
$90 per million gallons effective on January 1, 2011 and from $90 to 
$120 per million gallons effective on January 1, 2012. The non-
consumptive use rate is proposed to be increased from $.60 to $.90 per 
million gallons effective on January 1, 2011 and from $.90 to $1.20 per 
million gallons effective on January 1, 2012.''

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
Pamela M. Bush,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5219 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8051

In Re: WILLIAM STEWART MALONE, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (CA-95-541-AM) Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Stewart Malone, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Stewart Malone, a federal prisoner, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). This court will not entertain a § 2241 petition unless a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion is "inadequate [or] ineffective to test the legality of a person's detention." Swain v. Pressley , 430 U.S.372, 381 (1977). The petitioner bears the burden of showing the inadequacy or ineffectiveness of a § 2255 motion. McGhee v. Hanberry , 604 F.2d 9, 10 (5th Cir. 1979). Malone makes no showing that § 2255 provides an inadequate remedy. Although he has brought a prior unsuccessful § 2255 motion, this fact alone does not establish that the remedy is inadequate. Id. In his § 2241 petition, Malone makes only conclusory allegations that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his guiltyplea and that counsel was ineffective in failing to pursue allegedly exculpatory evidence. Finally, Malone's complaint of district court delay in ruling on his § 2255 motion is moot, since the district court denied the motion. United States v. Malone , Nos. CR93-312-A; CA-94-1146-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 25, 1995), aff'd No. 95-6271 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 1995) (unpublished). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

AMANDA MUSTARD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-485-RP

§

INFOWARS, LLC, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

Counsel for Defendant filed a notice of appearance on May 21, 2020. (Dkt. 6). Local Rule 

CV-16(c) requires the parties to submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court no later than 60 

days after any appearance of any defendant. (See also 2d. Am. Emergency Order, Dkt. 11, at 1 (noting 

that emergency procedures supplement the Local Rules, to which parties are still subject)). On July 

21, 2020, the Court ordered the parties to file their overdue proposed scheduling order by July 28, 

2020. (Order, Dkt. 13, at 1). To date, the parties have not done so.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall each show cause, in writing, by

August 5, 2020, as to why the Court should not impose sanctions against them or their counsel for 

failure to comply with the Court’s orders.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall each file their overdue notices as soon 

as practicable, but no later than August 5, 2020.

SIGNED on July 29, 2020.

_____________________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00485-RP Document 15 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5171 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5171

   To suspend temporarily the duty on imitation jewelry necklaces or 
                 bracelets, valued $10 each or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on imitation jewelry necklaces or 
                 bracelets, valued $10 each or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMITATION JEWELRY NECKLACES OR BRACELETS, VALUED $10 EACH OR 
              HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Imitation jewelry  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          necklaces or                                                      12/31/2015
                          bracelets, valued
                          $10 each or
                          higher (provided
                          for in
                          7117.19.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the annual report of
NuRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Harin Padma−Nathan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date: January28, 2010


/s/ Harin
      Padma−NathanName:
                Harin
      Padma−NathanTitle:
                President & Chief Executive
      Officer(principal executive
      officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SSL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1951

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-

01754.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Sigler, LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALAN M.

FISCH, MATTHEW R. BENNER, ROY WILLIAM SIGLER. 

 THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, 

TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L.

MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, PRANAY K. PATTANI;

THOMAS B. KING, Costa Mesa, CA.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court