alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.18****Amendment No. 1****SIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC.****CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT**This Amendment No. 1 to the Change in Control Severance Agreement (the “**Amendment**”), dated as ofFebruary 5, 2007, is made between SIFCO Industries, Inc**.**(the “**Company**”) and Remigijus H.Belzinskas (the “**Executive**”) for the purpose of amending and supplementing the documents andinstruments referred to below.WITNESSETH:     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to a Change in Control Severance Agreement madeas of September 28, 2000 (the ***“*****Agreement**” providing for certain severance benefits to Executive inthe event of a change in control of the Company; all terms used in the Agreement being used hereinwith the same meaning); and     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement toclarify the amount of severance benefits that were intended to be provided by the Agreement at thetime the Agreement was executed;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree asfollows:**Amendment to Agreement** — Exhibit A to the Change in Control Severance Agreement –Benefits, “Item a. **Severance**” is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:**a. Severance****.**In the event the Executive becomes eligible for benefits underSection 5 of the Agreement, the Company shall pay to the Executive or the Executive’sBeneficiary in a lump sum in cash within thirty (30) days after the Executive’s Dateof Termination an amount equal to: (i) the greater of (i) $140,000 or (ii) one (1.0) timesthe Executives annual salary;  (ii) the excess of (A) the actuarial equivalent of thebenefit under any qualified defined benefit pension plan the Company mayhave (the “Retirement Plan”), and any supplemental retirement plan inwhich the Executive participates (the “SERP”) which the Executive wouldreceive if the Executive’s employment continued for two (2) years afterthe Date of Termination assuming for this purpose that all accruedbenefits are fully vested, over (B) the actuarial equivalent of theExecutive’s actual benefit paid or payable, if any, under the RetirementPlan and the SERP as of the Date of Termination.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement effective as of the date firstwritten above.     SIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC. EXECUTIVE     By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Gotschall /s/ Remigijus H. Belzinskas   Title: Chairman and CEO Signature         Remigijus H. Belzinskas         Printed Name
1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study (WISE) Extension.                     

*Date:*                         October 30, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         3:30 PM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency, One Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David T George, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, Room 7188, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 27, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-25545  Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
      Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, AIG Debenture-Backed Series 2002-10
      Trust (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution
      or servicing reports of the Trust filed in respect of periods included
      in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;

   2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
      whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
      to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
      misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
      report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
      required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
      pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
      reports is included in these reports; and

   4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Depositor
      and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
      based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
      that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Depositor
      and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2005


      /s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

KT IMAGING USA, LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vACER AMERICA CORPORATION, 

ACER INC., 

 Defendants 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00299-ADA 

KT IMAGING USA, LLC, 

 Plaintiff 

-vASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., 

 Defendant

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00300-ADA 

ORDER TO PAY TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court previously appointed Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as a technical advisor on this 

case. The Court has reviewed Dr. Yi’s invoice for services through January 21, 2021 and finds 

the requested amount ($13,275.00) to be reasonable and necessary. As such, the Court ORDERS

payment to be promptly made as follows: 

Plaintiff: $4,425.00 

Acer: $4,425.00 

ASUSTeK: $4,425.00 

Dr. Yi will separately provide deposit instructions. 

SIGNED this 21st day of January, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00300-ADA Document 41 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 1
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01572

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01572\01572_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01572\01572_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01572\01572_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01572\01572_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01572\01572_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01572\01572_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01572\01572_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01572\01572_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01572\Certification Statement Plant ID 01572.pdf Plant certification statement

01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_IPL's Response to EPA ICR_IPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS D2-3 Ash Pond Retention Time Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS D3-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 March 2006 — Mediocurso v Commission

(Case T-451/04) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice - Adoption of implementing measures during the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2006/C 154/44)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Mediocurso — Estabelecimento de Ensino Particular, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Andrade and A. Weimar, Agents)

Re:

Action for failure to act seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to adopt the measures needed to comply with the judgment in Case C-462/98 P Mediocurso v Commission [2000] ECR I-7183

Operative part of the order

----

(1)OJ C 19, 22.1.05.

----
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 707    | 1,574  | 4,934  | 4,642 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,183  | 6,180  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
page 1 of 3 February 15, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Approved Exemption Request (#12837) Pursuant to Section 333 of the

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and Part 11 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

Remote Intelligence, LLC. (“RI”), pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform

Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) (“Section 333”), Subsection (f) of 49 U.S.C. § 44701, and 14

C.F.R. Part 11, was granted an exemption (#12837) from certain Federa l Aviation Regulations

(“FAR s”). This exemption allo w s RI to conduct commercial operations with Prioria’s Maveric

small Unmanned Aircraft System (“sUAS”) (the “Maveric”) and Prioria’s Hexacopter small

Unmanned Aircraft System (the “Hex ). Remote Intelligence is hereby requesting that our

existing exemption be amended to allow 3 additional UAS types for improved safety and

flexibility to meet our mission needs. We are requesting the addition of DJI ’ s Phantoms, DJI ’ s

Inspires, and Birds Eye A ero ’ s FireFly6.

UAS Weight Flight Configuratio n Estimated Flight Time

DJI Phantom < 3 lbs VTOL multirotor 25 minutes

DJI Inspire < 7 lbs VTOL multirotor 20 minutes

Birds Eye Aero FireFly6 < 9 lbs VTOL transitional wing 45 minutes

Pre

- and post

- flight inspections and systems checks will precede and follow each flight following

a prescr ibed protocol. Test flights are conducted following any upgrades to system software,

firmware, or hardware to ensure safety of operations. All 3 systems include GPS navigational

aide and stabilization

, remote monitoring of battery volt age and GPS signal, and automated

failsafes, including Return to Launch (RTL mode) o n demand and as a loss

- of

- link failsafe

. All

t hree systems use well

- tested control software from DJI or Pixhawk, are low in weight, and

relatively slow in velocity, wh ich will further enhance the safety of Remote Intelligence ’ s

operations.page 2 of 3 Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant approval of the requested

amendment without delay.

Sincerely,

J. Merlin Benner

Managing Partner

Remote Intelligence, LLC

953 Lake Road

Wellsboro, PA 16901page 3 of 3 Phantom

Inspire

FireFly 6
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

LINDA JANN LEWIS, MADISON LEE,

ELLEN SWEETS, BENNY 

ALEXANDER, GEORGE MORGAN, 

VOTO LATINO, TEXAS STATE 

CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION FOR THE 

ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED 

PEOPLE; and TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR

RETIRED AMERICANS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RUTH HUGHS, in her official capacity as 

the Texas Secretary of State,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 Civil Action No. 5:20-cv-00577-OLG

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

This case is currently before the Fifth Circuit on interlocutory appeal. The case will be 

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED during the pendency of the appeal and may be reopened 

upon receipt of a ruling by the Fifth Circuit or the filing of a motion by any party. 

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this day of March, 2021. 

ORLANDO L. GARCIA

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

29th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ March 29, 2021

 JU

Case 5:20-cv-00577-OLG Document 46 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 1
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.

	APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE COURT OF  COUNTYNO. 2-09-412   -        -CV

	APPELLANT	

	V.

	APPELLEE

InN tThHeE InNtTeErReEsStT oOfF A.B.K., aA ChHiIlLdD

	----------

	FROM THE 233RD         DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT            COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On December 8, 2009 ___________ and __________December 21, 2009, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 75[or $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $1275 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of Auaugusgust 28, 2007July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:    LIIVINGSTON, DAUPHINIOT, and GARDNER, JJ.OT 

DELIVERED:  January 714, 2010
·,

In The Matter Of: SCOTTTICE Respondent 

## SERVED: October 1, 2013

.., ·- .' ;---:· •.**,_··~·',.\-** /"-,-+ 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION·:

## ,\·~.!Lri-FH~i\r/~.1

. . ....... t,1 \1 )·1,,•• ' 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS ........ t·.r,,
..r]:,j'['.,'"' 

### ;_· <".
.**~,.\-** Lt ")-•, l**I\J~'-~;)** 

### WASHINGTON, DC ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2013-0042 Case No. 2012NE700211



### ORDER CANCELLING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
OnJune 14, 2013, an Order Setting Discovery and Motion Deadlines was file. Among otherthings, this Order set a telephone conference for October 10, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time to hold oral argument on any dispositive motions. As ofMonday, September 30,2013 (11:59 p.m.), Congress had not passed an appropriations bill to continue funding government operations. As a result, the Office of Hearings is shut down until Congress acts to appropriate the necessary funds.


### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The telephone conference scheduled for October 10, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Easterntime is cancelled. 2. A separate orderrescheduling the telephone conference will issue whenthis office is reopened.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1

Mr. R. Bennett Sargent 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ANE-7 New England Region Federal Aviation Administration 12NewEngland Executive Park Burlington, MA 01821 TEL: 781-238-7058 FAX: 781-238-7055 Mr. Scott Tice 

### Pro se Respondent 21125 Timberland Road Barronett, WI 54813-9540 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0042 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Upstream Biosciences Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended to September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joel Bellenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of December, 2010.


/s/ Joel Bellenson
----------------------------------------------------
Joel Bellenson, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Institutional Clinical Oncology Research Career Development 
Program PAR-00-63.
    Date: October 11, 2000.
    Time: 5 PM to 6 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: David E. Maslow, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard--Room 8054, Bethesda, MD 20892-
7405, 301/496-2330.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer 
Construction, 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, 
Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment 
Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers 
Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 27, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-25542 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M