alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7836

BRENDAN PEMBERTON EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

TITUS LAMONT BATS, a/k/a Titus Batts-Bey; ALONZO DURHAM-BEY, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03068-FL)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brendan Pemberton El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brendan Pemberton El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Pemberton El v. United States, No. 5:19-ct-03068-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2019). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

d0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140915 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140915 

 COA: 290297 

Oakland CC: 2008-223406-FC 

THOMAS HOWARD MCDANIEL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 99.1


                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-QSB of
Standard  Capital  Corporation (the "Company") for the nine months ended May 31,
2002,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I,  E.  Del  Thachuk,  President  and  Director,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.



Date: July 8, 2003
                                                /s/  "E.  Del  Thachuk"
                                              ------------------------------
                                                    E.  Del  Thachuk
                                                President  and  Director
#### PRICE v. STATE.

No. 24677.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 29, 1950.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1950.

See 229 S.W.2d 795.

Justice, Moore & Justice, Athens, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Driving an automobile while intoxicated: is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $180.

*183The statement of facts accompanying this record does not appear to have been filed in the trial court.' The State challenges our consideration of the statement of facts because of such fact.

The statement of facts, in order to be considered, must be filed in the trial court. Art. 760, C.C.P., Vernons’ Ann.C.C.P. art. 760; Martin v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 114 S.W.2d 554; Harris v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 36, 198 S.W.2d 1020.

In the absence of a statement of facts, the bills of exception appearing in the record cannot be considered.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 3.3



|DEAN HELLER                         
|------------------------------------
|Secretary of State                  
|204 North Carson Street, Suite 1    
|Carson City, Nevada 89701-4069      
|(775) 684-5708                      
|Website: secretaryofstate.biz       
|                                    
|                                    
|Certificate of Amendment            
|(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78, 390)
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY  



Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                  For Nevada Profit Corporation



1.	Name of corporation:

2.	The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):

3.	The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to
exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by
classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the* articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:  94.9%

4.	Effective date of filing (optional):

5.	Office Signature (required):

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other
right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment
regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT:



|This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees. | Nevada Secretary of State AM 38,385 Amend 2003
|-------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5128 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5128

  To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on ultrafine 
                        yttrium oxide phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on ultrafine 
                        yttrium oxide phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ULTRAFINE YTTRIUM OXIDE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.69 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ultrafine yttrium oxide 
phosphor) is amended--
            (1) in the article description column--
                    (A) by striking ``Yttrium oxide phosphor, activated 
                by europium'' and inserting ``Ultrafine yttrium oxide 
                phosphor, with a median particle size not to exceed 4.3 
                microns,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``subheading 3206.50.00'' and 
                inserting ``subheading 2846.90.80''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

p0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138095 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138095 

 COA: 281857 

Wayne CC: 05-005361-FC 

MASHAWNTAY MONTGOMERY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     United States International Trade Commission.                

*Time and Date:*                     October 5, 2000 at 11:00 a.m.                 

*Place:*                     Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.                

*Status:*                     Open to the public.                

### Matters to be Considered

1. Agenda for future meeting: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 303-TA-21 and 731-TA-451, 461, and 519 (Review)(Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Japan, Mexico, and Venezuela)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on October 20, 2000.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: (1.) Document No. GC-00-070: Approval of final disposition of investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-395 (Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash Memory, and Flash MicrocontrollerSemiconductor Devices and Products Containing Same). 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: September 27, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25174 Filed 9-27-00; 1:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>

STANDARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION                                     EXHIBIT  11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(In thousands, except per share information; unaudited)


                                                   First quarter ended
                                                         June 30
                                                   -------------------
                                                   2001          2000
                                                   ----          ----
BASIC  AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income applicable to common stock.......  $     3,717   $     1,688
                                              ===========   ===========

Basic average shares outstanding............   13,261,188    12,999,013
                                              ===========   ===========

Earnings per common share
     - net..................................  $      0.28   $      0.13
                                              ===========   ===========


Note: The incremental shares from assumed conversion of 7 1/4% convertible
subordinated debentures and the exercise of outstanding stock options are not
included in computing the diluted per-share amounts because the calculations
include adjustments which are antidilutive.
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2      | 3      | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 3      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of United American Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael Carey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United American Petroleum Corp., and will be retained by United American Petroleum Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/ Michael CareyMichael Carey, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

April 15, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

vs.

Juan Diego Hernandez-Roman

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CR-89-LY

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to the District Court pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The District Court referred this case to the United States Magistrate 

Judge for the taking of the defendant’s felony guilty plea and for his allocution pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

On March 5, 2020, the defendant and counsel appeared before the Magistrate Judge. The 

undersigned addressed the defendant personally in open court, informed him of the admonishments 

under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and determined that he understood 

those admonishments. The defendant pled guilty to one count of Illegal Re-entry into the United 

States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The Magistrate Judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, with the advice of his attorney, consented to enter this guilty plea before 

the Magistrate Judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the District Judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charge against him and possible 

penalties;

3. The defendant understands his constitutional and statutory rights, understands that his

constitutional and statutory rights can be waived, and understands the meaning and 

effect of the waiver of his constitutional and statutory rights;
4. The defendant’s plea was made freely and voluntarily;

5. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; and

6. There is a factual basis for this plea. 

RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court accept the defendant’s guilty 

plea and, after reviewing the presentence investigation report, enter a Final Judgment of guilt 

against him.

WARNING

The parties may file objections to this Report and Recommendation. A party filing objections 

must specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which objections are being made. 

The District Court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections. See Battle v. 

United States Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987). A party’s failure to file written 

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained within this Report within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report shall bar that party from de novo 

review by the District Court of the proposed findings and recommendations and, except on grounds 

of plain error, shall bar the party from appellate review of proposed factual findings and legal 

conclusions accepted by the District Court to which no objections were filed. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53, 106 S. Ct. 466, 472-74 (1985); Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

SIGNED on March 5, 2020.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE