alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000092066
<NAME> EFFICIENCY LODGES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         152,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  929,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,212,446
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,533,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,187,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     11,634,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,688
<OTHER-SE>                                   (166,671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,187,182
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               859,902
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  683,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,441)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5126 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on barium magnesium aluminate 

phosphor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on barium 

magnesium aluminate phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BARIUM MAGNESIUM ALUMINATE PHOSPHOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.64 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 barium magnesium aluminate phosphor) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5126 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Jessie WEAVER et al., Appellants, v. JEFFERSON STATE BANK.

No. 10960.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 1937.

R. Brown, of Crestón, Iowa, for appellants.

E. G. Graham and Mr. O. W. Harris, both of Jefferson, Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at costs of appellants, but without taxation of any costs in favor of appellee, per stipulation of parties.
Order filed, June 25, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00260

- CV

____________ WILLIAMS M. WALLS , Appellant

V.
HARRIS COUNTY, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 20004A



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 21, 2014

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On April 30 , 2014 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. On May 22, 2014 , this court issued a second order for the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the

c ourt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.We order Michelle Tucker , the official court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be

e ntertained

. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Michelle
Tucker does not timely file the record as ordered, we wi ll issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the
record.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5123 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5123

 To suspend temporarily the duty on a Phosphor Blend of Yttrium Oxide 
  doped with Europium, Cerium Aluminate doped with Terbium and Barium 
                     Aluminate doped with Europium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on a Phosphor Blend of Yttrium Oxide 
  doped with Europium, Cerium Aluminate doped with Terbium and Barium 
                     Aluminate doped with Europium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR BLEND OF YTTRIUM OXIDE DOPED WITH EUROPIUM, CERIUM 
              ALUMINATE DOPED WITH TERBIUM AND BARIUM ALUMINATE DOPED 
              WITH EUROPIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        A Phosphor Blend    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          of Yttrium Oxide                                                  12/31/2015
                          doped with
                          Europium, Cerium
                          Aluminate doped
                          with Terbium and
                          Barium Aluminate
                          doped with
                          Europium as a
                          preblended
                          luminophore (CAS
                          Nos. 102110-17-8,
                          102110-19-0, and
                          68585-82-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4728 

To extend the suspension of duty on Dimethyl malonate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Dimethyl malonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYL MALONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Dimethyl malonate) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 509 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 509

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that Act shall 
               not apply to the gray wolf (canis lupus).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

   Mr. Rehberg (for himself, Mr. Matheson, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Ross of 
  Arkansas, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Boren, Mr. Broun of 
    Georgia, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Heller, Mr. Kline, Mr. 
Labrador, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Walden, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that Act shall 
               not apply to the gray wolf (canis lupus).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF GRAY WOLF FROM ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.

    Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Exemption of Gray Wolf.--This Act shall not apply to the gray 
wolf (canis lupus).''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,377 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 172    | 140    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

ACQUANLAN DEONSHAY HARRIS 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CENLAR, FSB, 

Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00271-ADA-JCM 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

 

Plaintiff Acquanlan Deonshay Harris (“Plaintiff”) and Cenlar, FSB (“Defendant”), 

(collectively the “Parties”) file this Notice of Settlement and respectfully report to the Court as 

follows: 

The Parties have reached an agreement, in principle, to resolve the claims that Plaintiff 

asserts against Defendant in this action. The Parties have finalized the formal settlement 

agreement and are in the process of executing it. The Parties respectfully request that the Court 

vacate all pending hearings and deadlines and provide the Parties thirty (30) days to finalize the 

settlement documents and file a joint stipulation to dismiss with prejudice. 

DATED: July 15, 2022. Respectfully submitted, 

HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP 

By: /s/ Sabrina A. Neff 

Sabrina A. Neff 

TBN# 24065813 

600 Travis St., Suite 2350 

Houston, Texas 77002 

(713) 647-6800 – Telephone 

(713) 647-6884 – Facsimile 

sabrina.neff@huschblackwell.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

CENLAR FSB 

Case 6:20-cv-00271-ADA-DTG Document 26 Filed 07/15/22 Page 1 of 2
DANN LAW 

By: Marc Dann (with permission) 

Mark E. Dann (Ohio Bar No. 0039425) 

(admitted pro hac vice)

15000 Madison Avenue 

Lakewood, Ohio 44107 

(216) 373-0539 – Telephone 

(216) 373-0536 – Facsimile 

Notices@dannlaw.com

and 

ERIN B. SHANK, P.C. 

Erin B. Shank 

1902 Austin Avenue 

Waco, Texas 76701 

(254) 296-1161 – Telephone 

(254) 296-1165 – Facsimile 

erinbakershank@aol.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Settlement was served on all parties in 

accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the 15th day of July 2022. 

Erin B. Shank Via CM/ECF

ERIN B. SHANK, P.C. 

1902 Austin Avenue 

Waco, TX 76701 

Marc E. Dann Via CM/ECF

DANN law 

15000 Madison Avenue 

Lakewood, Ohio 44107 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

/s/ Sabrina A. Neff 

Sabrina A. Neff 

Case 6:20-cv-00271-ADA-DTG Document 26 Filed 07/15/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                  358,877
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           453,617
<ALLOWANCES>                            121,971
<INVENTORY>                           1,876,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,991,035
<PP&E>                                7,020,773
<DEPRECIATION>                        6,412,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        4,073,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,965,191
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                              2,982,510
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          4,073,547
<SALES>                              11,610,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     11,610,629
<CGS>                                 5,802,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,802,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        176,160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        9,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         951,181
<INCOME-TAX>                           (607,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,558,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         770,824
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,329,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .87
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Jamba, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-139645 and 333-122812) on Form S-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-139128) on Form S-8 of Jamba, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Jamba, Inc.
and subsidiary as of December 30, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 30, 2008, which reports appear in the December 30, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Jamba, Inc.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP             
|                         
|San Francisco, California
|March 16, 2009
#### CLAY v. STATE.

No. 26990.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Scurry County for the offense of unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $100;

■ The State’s wifnegs, Jack. Wallace, testified that 'on Sunday evening, November 22, 1953, he went to the home of the appellant in the town of Snyder, in Scurry County, for the purpose of buying some: whisky, having been requested to do so by an officer and furnished the-sum of $5 with which to purchase the same. Appellant at first refused to sell him any whisky without a recommendation which he soon obtained and returned to her house. Thereupon she told a boy to give the witness a pint of whisky after half breaking the seal, and receiving the $5 from the witness. The witness placed on the bottle the date and his initials and then delivered it to the deputy sheriff. This pint of. Sunny Brook Whisky was introduced in court and identified by the witness as that which had been sold to him by the appellant.

This sale was denied by the appellant, but the matter was decided against her by the jury.

It was stipulated that Scurry County was a dry area at the time of this sale.:.,

The State alleged in'thé information that this sale was made at the corner1 of Avenue I and 34th Street in Snyder, Texas, “and being the west 100 feet of Lot, 3-Block 28, T. N. Nunn Addition to the town of Snyder, Scurry County Texas, there situate.”

Appellant claims that there is a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof in that in the information it was alleged that the sale was made in the T. N. Nunn Addition to the town of Synder and that the proof showed that the offense was committed in the T. N. Nunn *Second*Addition to the town of Snyder. The State proved by the testimony of its witness that the appellant’s house, where this alleged sale was supposed to have taken place, was located at Avenue I and 34th Street in the town of Snyder, Texas. However, the allegation went further and stated: “and being the West one hundred feet of Lot 3, Block 28, of the T. N. Nunn Addition to the town of Snyder, Scurry County, there situate,” etc. Under these circumstances, we..are of the opinion that this offense took place on Avenue I. and 34th *464Street'in the town of Snyder, Texas. The ■remaining description thereof could be taken as surplusage.

We think that the trial court was correct in its ruling herein, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|California State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|California State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 15     | 0      | 0      | 44     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023