alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Texas - RRC District 7B Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Texas - RRC District 7B Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 36     | 17     | 123    | 6      | 22     | 26     | 54     | 47     | 31     | 577   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 803    | 163    | 21     | 2      | 412    | 36     | 4      | 239    | 298   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 93     | 61     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Arthur HALL, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1953.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for appeal from a judgment of the Pulaski Circuit Court, convicting mov-ant on a charge of having alcoholic liquor in his possession for purpose of sale in local option territory, and imposing a fine of $200 and 60 days in jail. A second offense.

The facts, questions raised, authorities cited and applicable law have been carefully reviewed by the court and no prejudicial error found.

The judgment is affirmed under authority of Reynolds v. Commonwealth, Ky.1953, 257 S.W.2d 514.
|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                                          
|                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of Aries Maritime Transport Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mons S. Bolin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 30, 2006

/s/ Mons S. Bolin
---------------------------
Mons S. Bolin
Chief Executive Officer

SK 23248 0002 683171
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 124    | 11     | 5      | 30     | 28     | 78     | 6      | 4      | 275    | 52    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 678    | 799    | 4      | 103    | 504    | 318    | 1,724  | 5,566  | 169    | 595   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,574  | 284    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### ANDERSON v. STATE.

No. 24462.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1949.

None on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction, for carrying a pistol, with a penalty of six months term in the county jail.

The statement of facts amply supports the jury’s verdict. We find no bills of exception and no brief filed by appellant. We are not advised of the grounds upon which appellant seeks a reversal of his case. , We find no error apparent in the record.

The judgment of the trial court is’ affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4977 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4977

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
                  hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
                  hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPENE, 1,1,2,3,3,3-HEXAFLUORO-, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Harris, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J., at suppression hearing; Shirley Levittan, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 4, 1987, convicting defendant of attempted murder in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *3Vi*to *IOV2*years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant has not established that his motion to suppress his exculpatory statements should have been granted. While defendant did not affirmatively state that he was willing to answer questions, his waiver of rights may be inferred from his statements and actions. Though unable to speak because of his self-inflicted injuries, defendant acknowledged his understanding of the *Miranda*warnings, and when told of the charges he faced, wrote that he had acted in self-defense. In response to the officer’s follow-up inquiry, defendant wrote that his infant son had been cut accidentally. We find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant offered his statement voluntarily, and not as the result of coercion or trickery *(People v Davis,*55 NY2d 731, 733). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMIE GEER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1032 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 26, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Sl()-l(H)12S-049 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

CITY AN D COUNTY OF HONOLUL U 

530SOpTW KING STREET, ROOM 306 • HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 

PHONE; (808) 768-4275 * FAX; (808) 768-4242 * INTERNET; www.honolulu.qov 

MUFI HANNEMANN 

MAYOR 

KIRK W. CALDWELL 

MANAGING OIRECTOft 

TRUDI S. SAITO 

DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR 

January 15, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

I am writing to express strong support for the antitrust immunity (ATI) application filed by : 

United Airlines, Continental and All Nippon Airways (ANA) with the U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT). DOT approval will enable these airlines to deliver competitive flight 

schedules, fares and services consumers demand. 

Your leadership in this matter will ensure that the United States fully realizes the benefits 

of the recent Open Skies aviation agreement between the governments of the United States and 

Japan, which will not go into effect unless and until DOT grants the ATI request. Open Skies 

with Japan is an enormous achievement and approval of this important application will maximize 

the benefits of the agreement with Japan by providing travelers more airline seats, destinations, 

routings, schedules and competitive prices. 

In this challenging economic environment, our airlines need to pursue all opportunities to 

allow them to succeed in an increasingly global marketplace. Your favorable action on this 

application would allow these airlines to generate significant price and service benefits for 

consumers, help preserve and enhance service to communities throughout the United States, 

and compete more effectively with other international airiines and alliances. 

We thank you for your wori< to achieve the U.S.-Japan Open Skies agreement and 

consideration of this request. 

With warm regards and aloha, 

Mufi Hanne 

Mayor 
2S-()40 

K 

T3 

O 

• p (0 +* t0 a. <A 

c <0 i~ 

O H-

3 : (0 —J 

• 

ac T3 

g >> <o 

<4-

0 

+-> c d) 

^ s

-

(d 

• laJ 

• 

00 «« 0 <u w 3 IT) c0 ) 0 CV4 

Q.«i> : a> 

0^ 0 

(U 

. 0 ra s- i n <u • p 

« +-> 

0 </) 

c 0 -a zn <u j d h- <u 

• > > o <u to &. 0) 

'-3 

S <u 

•»-> 0 

• r-

C =5 

0 CM 

I—1 

Q • 

C •. 

0 

•1-J O) E: •j = ^ 

C/1 <a 3 

3 

3 

o 

z 

o 

z u. 

o 

foi l u. EI o z
#### ROBINSON v. STATE.

No. 24395.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1949.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of burglary with intent to commit rape and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 15 years.

The only notice of appeal appearing in the record is what purports to be a copy of *264the judge’s docket notation, which is not sufficient. In the absence of proper notice of appeal entered of record, this Court has no jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

                           [LogicVision Letterhead]

June 19, 1996

Mr. Michael Howells
40 Herrington Court
Nepean, ON  K2H 5N7

Dear Michael:

With regard to our offer to provide you a loan from LV Software, Inc. of up to
$75,000 towards purchasing a home as part of your relocation to San Jose, this
letter is intended to clarify the terms and conditions of this loan.  If you
accept the terms and conditions indicated below, please sign below and return a
signed copy of this letter to me.

1.      The loan shall be in the amount of at most $75,000.  The purpose of this
loan shall be the purchase of a home in the San Jose area and related expenses.

2.      The loan will be simple interest at 8.0% per annum.  The company will
pay the interest and the taxes on interest-as-a-benefit for the first 5 years
from the date you draw the money.

3.      100,000 shares of your vested LV Software, Inc. common stock shall be
used as the collateral for this loan.

4.      At the end of a five year period you will have the option to a) repay
the loan in full or b) enter a repayment schedule for the loan based on a 10
year amortization at 8.0% per annum or c) forfeit your collateral.

5.      Should the company's common shares become publicly traded at anytime
during the first four years of this agreement and after one year of such public
trading the value of each common share found to be in excess of $1.25 a share,
then you will be obligated at such time to sell the collateral
and discharge the loan using the proceeds.

6.      The terms of this letter shall remain unchanged should you be terminated
by the company.

Sincerely,

/s/ Vinod Agarwal

Vinod K. Agarwal
President & CEO

I, Michael Howells, accept the terms and conditions specified in the above
letter.

Signed:  Michael Howells         Date:                  Location:
       /s/ Michael Howells       June 24, 1996          San Jose, CA
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPBOX, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPBOX, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-758-ADA

DECLARATION OF GREGORY LANTIER IN SUPPORT OF DROPBOX, INC.’S 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

I, Gregory H. Lantier, hereby declare:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, the State of New 

York, the State of Wyoming, the State of Texas and the Commonwealth of Virginia. I am a 

partner at the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (“WilmerHale”), counsel 

for Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) in the above-captioned action. I provide this declaration in support 

of Dropbox, Inc.’s Supplemental Briefing Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction. 

2. Unless otherwise indicated below, the statements in this declaration are based on 

my personal knowledge and my review of the documents cited herein. If called to testify as a 

witness, I could and would competently do so under oath.

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Judgment entered in 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 428-1 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 2
2

Profectus Tech. LLC v. Google LLC, 6:20-cv-00101-ADA (W.D. Tex.), Dkt. 220, dated June 13, 

2022.

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the Judgment entered in 

Freshub, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., 6:21-cv-00511-ADA (W.D. Tex.), Dkt. 268, dated July 13, 

2021.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true 

and correct.

Executed on January 30, 2024

/s/ Gregory H. Lantier 

Gregory H. Lantier

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 428-1 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5061 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC RED 1:1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.23 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Red 1:1) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 4.05(b)


                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                                INTERLAND, INC.
                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


         THIS AMENDMENT is made as of the 1st day of December, 1999,
by Interland, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Company");

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              --------------------

         WHEREAS, the Company established the Interland, Inc. Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") effective August 26, 1999; and

         WHEREAS, Article 13 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the
Company, upon receiving approval of the Shareholders, to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the Company desire
to amend the Plan to increase the total number of Shares which may be granted
or awarded under the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises,
and other good and valuable consideration, the Plan is amended as follows:

1.       Section 4.1 is hereby amended by deleting the number "4,000,000"
and replacing it with the number "4,500,000."

2.       This First Amendment shall be effective as of the date first above
written. Except as hereby amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned does hereby execute this First
Amendment to the Plan as of the date first above written.


                                    INTERLAND, INC.

                                    By:/s/ Kenneth Gavranovic
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Kenneth Gavranovic, President