alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Texas - RRC District 9 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Community
Financial Holding Company, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies
as follows:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

         Dated this 24th day of March, 2004.



                                     /s/ Thomas J. Martin
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Thomas J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12(a)



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary and Affiliate Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | -------------------------- | --- | ---- |  | - | --- | -
|Millions of Dollars, Except Ratios                       |      | Three Months EndedJune 30, |    
|                                                         | 2004 |                            |     | 2003 | 
|Earnings:                                                |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Net income                                               |      | $                          | 165 |      |  | $ | 295 |  
|Equity earnings net of distributions                     |      |                            | (11 | )    |  |   | (16 | )
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Total earnings                                           |      |                            | 154 |      |  |   | 279 |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Income taxes                                             |      |                            | 82  |      |  |   | 181 |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Fixed charges:                                           |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Interest expense including amortization of debt discount |      |                            | 123 |      |  |   | 124 |  
|Portion of rentals representing an interest factor       |      |                            | 48  |      |  |   | 67  |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Total fixed charges                                      |      |                            | 171 |      |  |   | 191 |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Earnings available for fixed charges                     |      | $                          | 407 |      |  | $ | 651 |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       |      |                            | 2.4 |      |  |   | 3.4 |  
|                                                         |      |                            |     |      |  |   |     |  



27
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5315 September Term, 2022

1:19-cv-01660-CKK

Filed On: April 10, 2023

In re: Sealed Case,

UNDER SEAL JUDGMENT

NOT AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC
In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

No. 99-1219

Kenneth Oliver,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Richard B. Gramley, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 97 C 4962--George W. Lindberg, Judge.

Submitted September 3, 1999--Decided December 29, 1999

Before Posner, Chief Judge, Bauer and Cudahy, Circuit Judges.

Posner, Chief Judge. The district judge dismissed Oliver’s petition for habeas corpus (28 U.S.C. sec. 2254) with prejudice (compare Demarest v. Price, 130 F.3d 922, 939 (10th Cir. 1997)), on the ground that he had committed a fraud on the court, and denied Oliver’s request for a certificate of appealability, and he renews the request with us.

When the state sought to dismiss Oliver’s petition for habeas corpus on the ground that he had failed to petition the Supreme Court of Illinois for leave to appeal, he came back with an affidavit swearing that he had given prison officials the petition to file, and he also submitted what appeared to be a certificate of service. The district judge thought the certificate a forgery and the affidavit perjurious, and Oliver, while denying that he intended to commit perjury or deceive the court, does not deny that the certificate was forged (by Oliver’s father) and the affidavit false. Although dismissal with prejudice is a permissible judicial sanction for fraud on the court, Kovilic Construction Co. v. Missbrenner, 106 F.3d 768, 773 (7th Cir. 1997); Peerless Industrial Paint Coatings Co. v. Canam Steel Corp., 979 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam);Nichols v. Klein Tools, Inc., 949 F.2d 1047 (8th

Cir. 1991); Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1122 (1st Cir. 1989); Wyle v. R.J. Renolds Industries, Inc., 709 F.2d 585, 589 (9th Cir. 1983), the general rule is that before dismissing a suit with prejudice as a sanction for misconduct a court should consider the adequacy of a less severe sanction, Ball v. City of Chicago, 2 F.3d 752, 758 (7th Cir. 1993); English v. Cowell, 969 F.2d 465, 473 (7th Cir. 1992); Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., supra, 892 F.2d at 1118; see also Kapco Mfg. Co. v. C & O Enterprises, Inc., 886 F.2d 1485, 1496 (7th Cir. 1989), and there is no indication that the district court did that here. But we do not think that such consideration is necessary in a case in which the plaintiff’s fraud is criminal in character and would if undetected destroy a legitimate and dispositive defense. Cf. Wyle v. R.J. Renolds Industries, Inc., supra, 709 F.2d at 591. Such behavior is so egregious, inexcusable, and destructive that no lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice could be adequate. See Nichols v. Klein Tools, Inc., supra, 949 F.2d at 1049; Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 396 (1st Cir. 1990); Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., supra, 892 F.2d at 1122; Brockton Savings Bank v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 771 F.2d 5, 11-12 (1st Cir. 1985); cf. C.K.S. Engineers, Inc. v. White Mountain Gypsum Co., 726 F.2d 1202, 1209 (7th Cir. 1984).

The request for a certificate for appealability is therefore

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection  with the annual report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Alan  Ginsberg,  Principal  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          A signed  original of this written  statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: March 14, 2006

/s/ Alan Ginsberg
-----------------
Alan Ginsberg
Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

(1) SHEILA FERREL-TURNER,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-MJ-00103-ESC

ORDER RESETTING JURY TRIAL

Before the Court is the above-styled cause of action is the Government’s Unopposed 

Motion for Continuance [#38]. By its motion, the United States asks the Court to continue the 

trial setting in this case due to the military deployment of certain witnesses for the Government. 

In light of the parties’ agreement that the trial should be continued, the Court will continue the 

trial setting in this case and now enters the following schedule: 

STATUS CONFERENCE: A status conference remains set for Friday, May 20, 2022, 

at 11:00 a.m. in the new United States Courthouse, 262 W. Nueva Street, San Antonio, Texas. 

The status conference will take place in Courtroom A. Only attorneys are required to attend 

this status conference.

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: A final pretrial conference is set for Friday, 

July 15, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. in the new United States Courthouse, 262 W. Nueva Street, San 

Antonio, Texas. The courtroom for this conference will be assigned at a later date. On the day 

of the conference, check the Court calendar on the website or the video kiosks by the elevators in 

the courthouse to determine which courtroom has been assigned.

Case 5:20-mj-00103-ESC Document 40 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 2
2

JURY SELECTION AND TRIAL: Jury selection and trial is set for Monday, July 18, 

2022, at 9:30 a.m. in the new United States Courthouse, 262 W. Nueva Street, San Antonio, 

Texas. The courtroom for this setting will be assigned at a later date. On the first day of the 

trial, check the Court calendar on the website or the video kiosks by the elevators in the 

courthouse to determine which courtroom has been assigned for the jury selection and trial. 

Counsel for defendant shall notify her of this setting, and if the defendant is on bond, advise the 

defendant that she must be present for all court settings unless excused by the Court. 

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION, VOIR DIRE, AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE, 

or supplements to the proposed instructions and voir dire already filed, shall be filed no 

later than Wednesday, July 13, 2022, at noon. The Court has assembled basic instructions used 

in all criminal cases defining juror’s duties, burden of proof, etc. Therefore, the parties need 

only submit those instructions which are related to the specific matter in issue. The parties are 

specifically instructed to submit to the Court their requested verdict form questions and 

jury instructions for Count 1 and Count 2, which will be tried to the jury. For all charges 

(including Counts 3 and 4, which will be tried to the bench), the parties must submit the elements 

of the offense and supporting authorities for the elements. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 19th day of May, 2022.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-mj-00103-ESC Document 40 Filed 05/19/22 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 195 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge; 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Environmental Assessment and Finding 
of No Significant Impact

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service has published a Comprehensive 
Conservation Plan, Environmental Assessment, and a Finding of No 
Significant Impact for the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National 
Wildlife Refuge. This refuge, located seven miles west of Boynton 
Beach, Florida, consists of 221 square miles of the last remaining 
northern Everglades. The plan describes how the Fish and Wildlife 
Service intends to manage the refuge for the next 15 years.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the above documents will be available on October 
6, 2000, and may be obtained by writing to Mark J. Musaus, Refuge 
Manager, Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, 10216 Lee Road, Boynton Beach, Florida 
33437-4796. In the meantime, a copy of the Comprehensive Conservation 
Plan and Environmental Assessment can be obtained from the following 
website address: http://loxahatchee.fws.gov

SUMMARY INFORMATION: The plan provides a clear statement regarding the 
future management of the refuge; ensures that the refuge's management 
actions are consistent with refuge purposes and mandates of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System; and addresses the issues regarding the 
renewal (planned by January 1, 2002) of the refuge's license agreement 
with the South Florida Water Management District, including issues 
relating to modifying the agreement and management capabilities and 
responsibilities. The major issues addressed in the plan include 
invasive exotic species; biological diversity; water quality, quantity, 
timing, and delivery; land use changes; habitat and wildlife 
protection; appropriate and compatible wildlife-dependent public 
recreational opportunities and access; environmental education and 
interpretation; and partnerships.

    Dated: September 19, 2000.
Steven P. Thompson,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-25712 Filed 10-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hotel Outsource Management
International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jacob Ronnel, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
      /s/ Jacob
      RonnelJacob
      Ronnel, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  OfficerHotel
      Outsource Management International, Inc.April
      15, 2009
SHAWN LOWRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2899

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 10, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

Shawn Lowry, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
----

Action brought on 24 January 2006 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM

(Case T-29/06)

(2006/C 86/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, USA) [represented by: G. Kuipers, lawyer]

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three dimensional mark in form of a square white tablet showing a blue five petalled floral design for goods in class 3 (washing and bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; preparations for the washing, cleaning and care of dishes; soaps) — application No 1 697 432

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. MG00-8-001]


Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Filing

September 28, 2000.
    Take notice that Egan Hub Partners, L.P. submitted revised 
standards of conduct on August 31, 2000 in response to the Commission's 
August 1, 2000 Order on Standards of Conduct, 92 FERC para. 61,137 
(2000).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest in this proceeding with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 or 215 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 
385.214). All such motions to intervene or protest should be filed on 
or before October 13, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
these filings are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25408 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2441

_____________________________
J OHN M ICHAEL K OZIK , Appellant,

v.

C RAIG H ANSON , a s

r epresentative of Alice Marie Kozik
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Thomas V. Dannheisser , Judge

. April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , R AY , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lois B. Lepp and Nicole A. Aloi of Lois B. Lepp, P.A., Pensacola
, for Appellant.

James L. Chase and Hunter R. Higdon of James L. Chase & Associates, PLC, Pensacola, for Appellee

.