alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,528  | 20     | 730    | 667    | 947    | 0      | 1,199  | 543    | 252    | 69    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 856    | 0      | 459    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 200    | 0      | 1,034 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,122  | 3      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
·, 

In The Matter Of: 

SCOTTTICE 

Respondent 

SERVED: October 1, 2013 

. ., ·- .' ;---:· •. ,_··~·',.\- /"-,-+ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION·: . . ,\·~.!Lri-FH~i\r/~.1 ..... .. t,1 \1 )·1,, •• ' 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ........ t·.r,, .. r]:,j'['.,'"' ;_· <". . ~,.\- Lt ")-•, l I\J~'-~;) 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0042 

Case No. 2012NE700211 

ORDER CANCELLING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 

On June 14, 2013, an Order Setting Discovery and Motion Deadlines was file. Among 

other things, this Order set a telephone conference for October 10, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern 

time to hold oral argument on any dispositive motions. 

As of Monday, September 30,2013 (11:59 p.m.), Congress had not passed an 

appropriations bill to continue funding government operations. As a result, the Office of 

Hearings is shut down until Congress acts to appropriate the necessary funds. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The telephone conference scheduled for October 10, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time is 

cancelled. 

2. A separate order rescheduling the telephone conference will issue when this office is 

reopened. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Mr. R. Bennett Sargent 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ANE-7 

New England Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01821 

TEL: 781-238-7058 

FAX: 781-238-7055 

Mr. Scott Tice 

Pro se Respondent 

21125 Timberland Road 

Barronett, WI 54813-9540 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0042 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

§

§

§

§

V. CAUSE NO. SA-20-0522-M

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES 

PEREZ

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES Alfredo R. Villarreal, Assistant Federal Public Defender and enters his

appearance as counsel for the defendant in the above-styled and numbered cause.

Respectfully submitted, 

MAUREEN SCOTT FRANCO

Federal Public Defender

/s/ ALFREDO R. VILLARREAL

Assistant Federal Public Defender

727 E. César E. Chávez Blvd., Suite B-207

San Antonio, Texas 78206-1205

State Bar No. 20581850

Tel.: 210-472-6700

Fax: 210-472-4454

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 9th day of April, 2020, I filed the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance using the CM/ECF system which will give electronic notification to the following:

Mark T. Roomberg

Assistant United States Attorney

601 NW Loop 410, Suite 600

San Antonio, Texas 78216

/s/ ALFREDO R. VILLARREAL

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 5:20-mj-00522-RBF Document 14 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent System (1200).                     

*Date and Time:*                         October 24, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1120, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Ephraim Glinert, Deputy Division Director, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va 22230, Telephone: (703) 292-8930.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Human and Computer Interaction Career proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                     

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

      ( print page 58827)    
Dated: September 27, 2000.

Karen J. York, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-25189  Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### CLEMMENS v. STATE.

No. 25081.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1951.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Waiving trial by jury, appellant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty before the .court, for the offense of transporting whisky in a dry area, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $750.

*182No bills of exception or statement of facts accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

SAM MAVERICK SPIRIT, LLC

vs. 

ALAMO PREMIUM DISTILLERY, INC.,

ET.AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No.: SA:20-CV-00333-OLG

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PAPERS

On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 counsel for plaintiff and defendants jointly advised the

Court that this case settled. The parties have not filed the closing paperwork in this case. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) The parties shall submit a stipulation of dismissal or agreed judgment and any

appropriate supporting documents on or before Friday, April 30, 2021. If the parties are

unable to submit those documents by that date, Plaintiff should move for an extension of

time to file the documents. Failure to so move shall result in a dismissal of this case

from the Court's docket for failure to diligently prosecute.

2) All pretrial deadlines in this case are hereby STAYED pending the submission of the

parties' stipulation of dismissal or agreed judgment, and any appropriate supporting

documents. These deadlines will be reinstated if the parties are unable to finalize their

settlement of this case.

3) Any motions pending in this action are DENIED, subject to reurging should

settlement fail.

4) The Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on the attorney for the defendant.

5) The pretrial conference and trial settings are cancelled.

No extensions of the above deadline shall be granted except upon a showing of good

cause.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 24th day of February, 2021. 

______________________________

ORLANDO L. GARCIA

CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00333-OLG Document 21 Filed 02/24/21 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Liberatore, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress granted, plea vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: The hearing court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of the eavesdropping warrants and search warrants. The People did not furnish defendant with a copy of the affirmed statement of an undisclosed confidential informant that was part of the application for an eavesdropping warrant submitted to the issuing Magistrate. The People, therefore, failed to comply with the notice provision of CPL 700.70 and made "neither an application for an extension of time within the 15 days provided in that statute nor a showing of good cause for noncompliance and lack of prejudice to defendant” *(People v Schulz,*67 NY2d 144, 147; *see also, People v Mark,*68 AD2d 315, 318).

Further, since it cannot be said that defendant’s guilty plea was not affected by the hearing court’s error, we are unable to conclude that it was harmless *(see, People v Grant,*45 NY2d 366, 379-380). Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s guilty plea. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J.— criminal possession of controlled substance, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Note: The FAA considers the following e-mail from the petitioner to be sufficient as a 

statement of petition withdrawal.

To: Steve Slotte/ANM/FAA@FAA

From: Anthony Pilcher <Anthony.Pilcher@Armstrongaerospace.com>

Date: 06/25/2013 11:57AM

Cc: Nick Grasberger <Nick.Grasberger@Armstrongaerospace.com>

Subject: RE: Armstrong Aerospace - 26.11(c) Exemption Application

Steve,

I received your voicemail. We were able to work with the Chicago ACO to develop and 

achieve approval of a generic EWIS ICA Evaluation that is repeatedly used for these 

projects. Thank you for that suggestion.

Please provide instructions on how I can withdraw the Armstrong request for exemption 

and I will do so.

Thanks,

Anthony

______________________________________________

Anthony Pilcher

Director, Technology, Innovation & Compliance

Armstrong Aerospace Inc.

1437 Harmony Court

Itasca, IL 60143 

Office: (630) 285-0200 ext. 112

Mobile: (501) 310-6423

www.armstrongaerospace.com
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18United States Code**

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officerof Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (“Enbridge Management”), hereby certifiesthat the Enbridge Management’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2006, filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such Annual Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Enbridge Management.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Enbridge Management and will beretained by Enbridge Management and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
| Date: February 22, 2007         |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
| /s/ Stephen J.J. Letwin         |   |
| Stephen J. J. Letwin            |
| *Managing Director*             |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 23581.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5077 

To extend the suspension of duty on ion-exchange resin powder comprised 

of a copolymer of methacrylic acid cross-linked with divinylbenzene, in 

the potassium ionic form, of a nominal particle size between 0.025 

mm and 0.150 mm, dried to less than 10% moisture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on ion-exchange resin powder comprised of a copolymer of methacrylic acid crosslinked with divinylbenzene, in the potassium ionic form, 

of a nominal particle size between 0.025 mm and 0.150 

mm, dried to less than 10% moisture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5077 IH

1 SECTION 1. ION-EXCHANGE RESIN POWDER COMPRISED OF 

2 A COPOLYMER OF METHACRYLIC ACID 

3 CROSS-LINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, IN 

4 THE POTASSIUM IONIC FORM, OF A NOMINAL 

5 PARTICLE SIZE BETWEEN 0.025 MM AND 0.150 

6 MM, DRIED TO LESS THAN 10% MOISTURE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.79 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 ion-exchange resin powder comprised of a copolymer of 

10 methacrylic acid cross-linked with divinylbenzene, in the 

11 potassium ionic form, of a nominal particle size between 

12 0.025 mm and 0.150 mm, dried to less than 10% mois13 ture) is amended by striking the date in the effective pe14 riod column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

17 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4923 

To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium unwrought. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. HANNA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium unwrought. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GERMANIUM UNWROUGHT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Germanium unwrought 

(CAS No. 7440–56–4) 

(provided for in subheading 8112.92.60) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4923 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>



  <ARTICLE>                                                              5
  <MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000,000


  <S>                                                              <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     12-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1999
  <CASH>                                                               135
  <SECURITIES>                                                         317
  <RECEIVABLES>                                                      3,155
  <ALLOWANCES>                                                          80
  <INVENTORY>                                                          242
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   3,625
  <PP&E>                                                            52,208
  <DEPRECIATION>                                                    32,613
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    25,175
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              6,630
  <BONDS>                                                            6,145
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
  <PREFERRED>                                                            0
  <COMMON>                                                           7,389
  <OTHER-SE>                                                         1,548
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      25,175
  <SALES>                                                              195
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  13,230
  <CGS>                                                                180
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      6,979
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   2,593
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     110
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   410
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    3,266
  <INCOME-TAX>                                                       1,225
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                2,041
  <DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
  <CHANGES>                                                              0
  <NET-INCOME>                                                       2,041
  <EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.00
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.00




</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51115 Conference Calendar

JOHN LEE COOK, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-00-CV-28

-------------------- April 10, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Lee Cook, Sr., former Texas prisoner 672488, argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (“Board”) illegally extended his sentence by denying him parole or revoking his parole based on void convictions, evidence of substance abuse relied upon in prior proceedings, or unauthenticated evidence of substance abuse. Cook is seeking only monetary compensation from the Board.No. 00-51115 -2- Cook has not challenged the district court’s dismissal of his complaint against the Board based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. Thus, he has abandoned the sole ground for appeal.
See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Cook has failed to raise an issue of arguable merit, the appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Cook’s request for injunctive relief is DENIED.