alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CALHOUN v. SALLEE.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1953.

*64Fulton & Hubbard, Bardstown, for appellant.

J. T. Hatcher, Elizabethtown, for appel-lee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Mrs. Mattie Lucille Sallee was awarded damages in the amount of $4,334.50 for personal injuries sustained .when the automobile of the appellant knocked her down and ran over the calf of her leg. The appellant claims that the verdict is excessive; and was given under passion and prejudice.

The appellee’s leg was npt broken. However, she was confined in bed for two months, and at the time of .the trial, eight months after the accident, her condition was suchas to require her to use crutches on occasions and to wear an elastic stocking. There was evidence that she had been unable to resume her occupation as a professional seamstress, from which she had earned an average of $50 per month, and was unable to perform her usual tasks about the home. Dr. Bale testified that .there were -injuries to the tendons, muscles and cartilages in the knee; that this type of injury was, worse than a broken bone; and that the appellee has had and will continue to have for some time pain and swelling. Under this evidence we cannot say that the award is excessive or was the result of passion and.-prejudice. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Reno, 237 Ky. 452, 35 S.W.2d 902.

The appellant further contends that there was insufficient evidence to justify an instruction on permanent disability. Dr. Bale was asked, “Does she have some permanent disability to that leg?” He answered, “I am afraid she does.” Dr. Bale also said, “I doubt if it will ever be a perfectly normal leg again.” He further said, “I am afraid she is going to have some degree of permanent disability.” We do not construe the words “afraid” and “doubt,” as they were used by Dr. Bale, to have the meaning of guess or speculation; rather they express regret concerning a condition which the doctor found definitely to exist. Construing the doctor’s words in the generally accepted meaning, we think there was sufficient evidence to authorize the instruction on permanent disability.

The third contention of the appellant is that the petition did not contain allegations sufficient to warrant the instruction on permanent disability. The petition ¿obtained a general description of the plaintiff’s injuries, followed by the words, “from which her ability to labor and earn money has been permanently impaired.” This was a sufficient allegation. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Campbell, 237 Ky. 182, 35 S.W.2d 26; Central Kentucky Traction Co. v. Chapman, 130 Ky. 342, 113 S.W. 438.

The judgment is affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

APPLIANCE COMPUTING III, INC.

d/b/a SUREFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v.

REDFIN CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:20-cv-00376-ADA

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR FURTHER THREE-DAY EXTENSION OF 

RULE CV-54 DEADLINES RELATED TO BILL OF COSTS

Before the Court is Plaintiff Appliance Computing III, Inc. d/b/a Surefield’s and 

Defendant Redfin Corporation’s Joint Motion for Further Three-Day Extension of Rule CV-54 

Deadlines Related to Bill of Costs (the “Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion and finding good 

cause exists, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the dates in the above-referenced cause are

amended as follows: 

Current Deadline Amended Deadline Event

September 26, 2022 September 29, 2022 Deadline by which to file Rule CV-54.a.3 

motion.

September 26, 2022 September 29, 2022 Earliest date by which the clerk may tax 

costs if no motion is filed by this date. See 

Rule CV-54.a.4. (“The clerk shall not tax 

costs until the expiration of 21 days after 

the filing of the proposed bill of costs. If 

no motion is filed in that time period, the 

clerk shall proceed to tax costs.”) 

October 3, 2022 October 6, 2022 Date by which costs will be deemed taxed 

as proposed if bill of cost is uncontested 

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 256 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 2
2

and if clerk fails to tax costs by this date. 

See Rule CV-54.a.4 (“In a case involving 

an uncontested bill of costs, if the clerk 

fails to tax costs within 28 days after the 

proposed bill of costs is filed, costs will be 

deemed taxed as proposed.”) 

ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2022. 

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 256 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer

     CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

     Seon Hong Kim and Yong Hwa Kim hereby certify as follows:

     1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Center Financial Corporation.

     2. The Form 10-K of Center Financial Corporation for the Year Ended
December 31, 2002 complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information
contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Center Financial
Corporation.

                                                       /s/ Seon Hong Kim
                                                       _________________________

                                                       Seon Hong Kim
                                                       President &
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                                       /s/ Yong Hwa Kim
                                                       _________________________

                                                       Yong Hwa Kim
                                                       Senior Vice President &
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4185 — CVCI/Amber Trust II/AB Sanitas)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 123/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
#### Sandra M. Lillard, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lamont C. Lillard, Deceased, Appellant, v Donald F. Carter et al., Defendants. Morris, Cantor, Ziller & Barnes, Non-party Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Appeal unanimously dis*889missed without costs *(see, Loafin’ Tree Rest, v Pardi,*162 AD2d 985). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.—attorney’s fees.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 2232-381, 2331-014, 2332-021, 2503-048, 2740-041 North and South Carolina]

An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of approving Duke Energy Corporation's (Duke) excavation programmatic agreement (PA) for the above five projects located in North and South Carolina. These projects include the following 16 reservoirs: Lake James, Rodhiss, Hickory, Lookout Shoals, Norman, Mountain Island, Wylie, Fishing Creek, Great Falls, Rocky Creek, Wateree, Ninety-Nine Islands, Gaston Shoals, Jocassee, Keowee and Bad Creek.

In its PA, Duke requests authority to grant permits to excavate up to 2,000 cubic yards (cy) of lakebottom sediments without obtaining prior Commission approval. Duke also asks for authority to grant permits for maintenance excavations involving any amount of sediment. Maintenance excavations are defined in the PA. Applicants would still have to obtain all other necessary local, state and federal permits and many other restrictions apply.

                    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In the EA, Commission staff conclude that approving the PA and granting Duke the requested authority would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be viewed on the web at                     *www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm.*                     Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25331 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS j 9: t6 EL PASO DIVISION 

BRANDON CALLIER, 

Plaintiff, V. SUNPATH LTD, NORTHOCAST 

WARRANTY SERVICES, INC., 

NATIONAL CAR CURE LLC, CELTIC 

MARKETING, LLC, AND JOHN DOES 

1-4, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:20-cv-00106 

PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, BRANDON CALLIER, in his individual capacity, pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(l)(A)(i), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant, NATIONAL CAR CURE, LLC, with 

prejudice. 

1. Defendant, NATIONAL CAR CURE, LLC ("Defendant"), has not filed an Answer 

or a Motion for Summary Judgment and therefore the dismissal of this action at Plaintiff's request 

is proper pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i). 

2. Defendant shall be dismissed with Prejudice with each party bearing his/their own 

attorneys' fees and costs. 

Dated this 6th day of November, 2020. 

Brandon Callier 

Plaintiff, Pro-se 

6336 Franklin Trail 

El Paso, TX 79912 

Case 3:20-cv-00106-FM Document 49 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY certify that a true copy of the foregoing was mailed to Defendant in this case via 

USPS first class mail to: Jason S. Weiss, 5531 N. University Drive, Suite 103, Coral Springs, 

Florida 33067 on this 6th day of November, 2020. 

Brandon Callier 

Plaintiff, pro se 

6336 Franklin Trail 

El Paso, TX 79912 

Ca1Iier74(gmail.com 

915-383-4604 

Case 3:20-cv-00106-FM Document 49 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 24    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 2,011  | 130    | 16     | 0      | 406    | 455    | 169    | 161    | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 50     | 351    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Michigan Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Michigan Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0      | 1      | 2      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 8     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 5      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 2      | 3      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Louisiana - South Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Louisiana - South Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 398    | 540    | 433    | 171    | 259    | 217    | 544    | 373    | 140    | 50    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 253    | 381    | 104    | 286    | 301    | 56     | 56     | 173    | 5      | 107   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 204    | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT F
1

2000 E. Lamar Boulevard, Suite 600

Arlington, Texas 76006

Office Number: (817) 653-4547

Facsimile: (817) 653-4477

www.whitburnpevsner.com

March 31, 2020

Eric Hansum

Niemann & Heyer, L.L.P.

Westgate Building, Suite 313

1122 Colorado Street

Austin, Texas 78701-2101

Re: 2105 Real Catorce Drive, Austin, Texas 78746

Dear Mr. Hansum,

As you may know, your client has begun imposing fines with respect to alleged 

violations at the above-referenced address. It appears that the vast majority of these 

alleged violations involve the claim that residents of 2105 Real Catorce Drive (the “Real 

Catorce Residence”) parked on the street for more than twelve hours at a time. After 

reviewing these allegations, we request a reasonable accommodation at least under 

current circumstances and we also request clarification, as detailed below.

My clients respectfully request a reasonable accommodation with respect to parking 

restrictions until the shelter-in-place orders are lifted in the City of Austin. A national 

emergency was declared in the United States on March 13, 2020. Social distancing 

guidelines were initiated on March 15, 2020. The City of Austin imposed shelter-inplace orders on March 24, 2020. These orders currently extend until April 13, 2020. To 

comply with these orders, the residents of the Real Catorce Residence must remain in 

place and cannot, therefore, move their vehicles elsewhere. An accommodation waiving 

the parking restrictions for the duration of the shelter-in-place orders is therefore 

reasonable.

My clients also request clarification, as they do not understand how the Board and its 

management personnel are determining these violations. My clients deny that residents 

are parking in the street for twelve hours at a time, other than as made necessary by the 

current health crisis, except that a few residents who came to the Real Catorce Residence 

after the district court’s February 18, 2020, judgment, may have had some difficulty with 

the parking requirements as they cannot immediately seek employment and generally ride 

together with other residents and mentors during the earliest stages of their time 

transitioning out of a treatment facility. Further information and clarification from your 

client on the dates, times, and circumstances surrounding the alleged violations will allow 

my clients to determine whether and how such violations occurred and whether they need 

to seek related accommodations.

We would very much appreciate your response by the close of business (5:00 p.m. 

Central) of Wednesday, April 1, 2020, at least with respect to the issue of a reasonable 

accommodation as to the parking restrictions during the pendency of the shelter-in-place 

orders in Austin. Thanks very much, as always.
2

2000 E. Lamar Boulevard, Suite 600

Arlington, Texas 76006

Office Number: (817) 653-4547

Facsimile: (817) 653-4477

www.whitburnpevsner.com

Sincerely,

Mark Whitburn

Mark Whitburn