alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5286 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5286

       To extend the suspension of duty on Titanium mononitride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the suspension of duty on Titanium mononitride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TITANIUM MONONITRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Titanium mononitride) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1.1**
***Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for SCW***
I, Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005of Southern California Water Company (referred to as “SCW”);
 2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
 3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the SCW as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
 4)  SCW’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for SCW and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to SCW, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of SCW’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
 c)  disclosed in this report any change in SCW’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during SCW’s most recent fiscal quarter (SCW’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, SCW’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5)  SCW’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the SCW’s auditors and theaudit committee of SCW’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the SCW’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in SCW’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Dated: May 10, 2005 By: /s/ FLOYD E. WICKS       Floyd E. Wicks
#### YOWELL v. STATE.

No. 25142.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 7, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Crim. Dist. Atty., E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., of Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Driving while intoxicated upon a public highway is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record before us contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings for the Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies 
(1751):

    Date and Time: October 12, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; and October 13, 
2000, 8 a.m.-Adjourn.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
375, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Penelope Firth, Program Officer or Dr. Carol 
Johnston, Program Officer, Ecological Studies, Room 640N, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 
22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8481.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted in response 
to the Ecological Studies Ecosystem Studies Program Solicitation 
(99-2).

    Date and Time: October 11, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; and October 13, 
2000, 8 a.m.-Adjourn.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
375, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Scott L. Collins, Program Officer or Mr. Aaron 
Kinchen, Program and Technology Analyst, Ecological Studies, Room 
640N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
Virginia 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8481.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted in response 
to the Ecological Studies Ecosystem Studies Program Solicitation 
(99-2).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25205 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4912 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4912

       To suspend temporarily the duty on motor generator units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

    Mr. Clarke of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on motor generator units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOTOR GENERATOR UNITS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Motor generator     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          units with three-                                                 12/31/2015
                          phase cable
                          assembly, the
                          foregoing
                          designed to
                          function as a
                          starter motor and
                          electric motor
                          supplementing the
                          gasoline internal
                          combustion engine
                          and as a
                          generator for
                          recharging
                          vehicle batteries
                          in regenerative
                          braking mode;
                          certified by the
                          importer for use
                          in hybrid
                          electric vehicles
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8511.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Soitec Solar Inc.

4250 Executive Square, Suite 770 

La Jolla, CA 92037 (USA) 

T. + 1 858-638-0995 

F. + 1 858-638-0986

clark.crawford@soitec.com 

www.soitec.com 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

March 15, 2012 

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Soitec fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington 

Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct service to DCA. 

Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s 

capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the 

convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capital. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average 

airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The 

high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average 

about $60 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles 

can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in 

health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to 

Reagan National Airport. Soitec has an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s 

capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, 

DC. Soitec joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic 

Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of 

Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots. 
Soitec Solar Inc. 

Page 2 

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced docket

and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon. 

Sincerely, 

Clark Crawford 

VP Sales and Business Development N.A., Soitec
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTS



As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our report  included in this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999,  of Southern  California  Edison  Company into the
previously filed Registration Statements which follow:

      Registration Form             File No.                Effective Date
     --------------------           --------                --------------

         Form S-3                  33-53288                 November 6, 1992
         Form S-3                  33-50251                 September 21, 1993
         Form S-3                  33-59001                 May 15, 1995
         Form S-3                  333-00497                February 2, 1996



                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

May 6, 1999
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Floyd E. Wicks, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/  Floyd E. Wicks |   |
|---------------------|--------|

 

FloydE. WicksChief Executive Officer

 

Date:November 7, 2008

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5126 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5126

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on barium magnesium 
                          aluminate phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on barium magnesium 
                          aluminate phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BARIUM MAGNESIUM ALUMINATE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.64 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to barium magnesium aluminate 
phosphor) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 5:20-mj-00455-HJB Document 1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:20-mj-00455-HJB Document 1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:20-mj-00455-HJB Document 1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:20-mj-00455-HJB Document 1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 4 of 4
#### WADE v. STATE.

No. 24682.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1950.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1950.

*176None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a wet area without having first procured a permit to sell such liquor from the proper authorities, and upon conviction, she was assessed a fine of $100.00.

There are no bills of exception nor statement of facts found in the record. The information and all other matters of procedure seem to be in proper form.

The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, P. J., absent
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November                2, 2007                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
|  /s/William                B. Timmerman                     |   |
| William                B. Timmerman                              |   |
| Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                                             |   |
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 24     | 4      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2      | 5      | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ JERRY BRIAN INWOOD,
Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent

______________________

2024

- 1469

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH

- 0752

- 17

- 0461

- I

- 1

.

______________________
O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is Case: 24-1469 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024I NWOOD V

. DHS 2

ORDERED that t h e p e t i t i o n f o r r e v i e w b e , a n d t h e same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

April 11, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 11, 2024 Case: 24-1469 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024
Page 4 of 19