alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4907 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lucirin TPO. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CLARKE of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lucirin TPO. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LUCIRIN TPO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Diphenyl(2,4,6- 

trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine 

oxide (CAS No. 75980– 

60–8) (provided for in subheading 2926.90.30) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4907 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                             
|No chart available.                                                             
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                                    Schedule

                  Information on seven substantially identical
                                Promissory Notes
                             dated June 20, 2001 and
             made payable to the order of First Union National Bank

      (Seven additional documents are identical, except as set forth below,
                    to the document included as Exhibit 4.1)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Principal                 Monthly
Apartment Property                        Borrower                                 Amount             Installment
------------------                        --------                                 ------             -----------
<S>                                       <C>                                  <C>                    <C>
Deerfield Apartments                      CRIT-NC IV, LLC                      10,220,000               69,095.63
Durham, North Carolina

Meadow Creek Apartments                   CRIT-NC IV, LLC                       9,590,000               64,836.31
Pineville, North Carolina

Pinnacle Ridge Apartments                 CRIT-NC IV, LLC                       5,005,000               33,837.93
Asheville, North Carolina

Cottonwood Crossing Apartments            CAC V Limited Partnership             6,055,000               40,936.80
Arlington, Texas

Main Park Apartments                      CAC V Limited Partnership             8,465,000               57,230.39
Duncanville, Texas

Paces Cove Apartments                     CAC V Limited Partnership            11,165,000               75,484.61
Dallas, Texas

Wildwood Apartments                       CAC V Limited Partnership             3,400,000               22,986.81
Eucless, Texas
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7164

GARY LEWIS MILLER, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus PASQUOTANK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JAMES B.HUNT, JR., Governor; DANIEL L. STIENEKE, Director of Prisons; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-394-5-F) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lewis Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Gary Lewis Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Pasquotank Correctional Institution , No. CA-99-394-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1999). We deny Miller’s motionfor production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                     
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Texas--RRC District 5 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5093 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5093

    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on alpha-threo Phenyl-2-
                          piperidyl acetamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on alpha-threo Phenyl-2-
                          piperidyl acetamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALPHA-THREO PHENYL-2-PIPERIDYL ACETAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Alpha-threo Phenyl- Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          2-piperidyl                                                       12/31/2015
                          acetamide (CAS
                          No. 50288-62-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.39.91)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7698

DAVID CHARLES WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NEWMAN, Officer; GOINS; FRANCIS, Sgt.; RANSOM, Officer; LAWSON, Sgt.; KILLINSON, Officer; DOCTOR MUSSELMAN; JENKINS, Lt.; MOORE, Capt.; BRUBAKER, Major,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00422-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Charles Willis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Charles Willis appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Willis v. Newman , No. 7:08-cv00422-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 2 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 3 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 4 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 5 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 6 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 7 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 8 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 9 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 10 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 11 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 12 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 13 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 14 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 15 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 16 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 17 of 18Case 1:20-cv-00273-RP Document 135 Filed 03/10/23 Page 18 of 18
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (“Enbridge Management”), herebycertifies that Enbridge Management’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, (the “Annual Report”), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant toSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Enbridge Management. 

Date: February 18, 2011
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Dario Sacomani, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Spansion Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
companys most recent fiscal quarter (the companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: | March 13, 2006
|----- | --------------



/S/    DARIO
SACOMANIDario Sacomani Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
DENY and Opinion Filed September 22, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00410-CV 

IN RE THRESHER AND THRESHER, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05644 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Schenck 

In this original proceeding, relators ask us to compel the trial court to vacate 

its order striking their expert witness. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires 

relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an 

adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 

2004) (orig. proceeding). 

Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude that relators have 

not shown they lack an adequate remedy. See In re Flores, No. 05-19-01058-CV, 

2020 WL 2847531, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 2, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. 

op.) (denying mandamus relief for orders striking experts because relators had 
 –2– 

adequate remedy by appeal). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

210410F.P05 

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT A
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 215    | 50     | 105    | 394    | 1      | 103    | 85     | 88     | 69    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 137    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
cool_ex1084.htm

EXHIBIT 10.84
  
 AMENDMENT
 TO THE $165,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED August 24, 2018
  
 The parties agree that $165,000 Promissory Note by and between Cool Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) and Lucas Hoppel (“Holder”) is hereby amended as follows:
  
 Maturity Date: The Maturity Date shall be extended to April 30th, 2018.
  
 Conversion Price: The Conversion Price in section 3(a)(ii) shall permanently be changed to equal $0.025 cents.
  
 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE $165,000 PROMISSORY NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
  
 Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated February 19th, 2018 by signing below:
  
  	 /s/ Tim Hassett	 	/s/ Lucas Hoppel	 
	Tim Hassett 	 	Lucas Hoppel	 
	 Cool Technologies, Inc.
 Chief Executive Officer