alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5295 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Benzoate, ODR/FLV Comp. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Benzoate, ODR/ 

FLV Comp. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM BENZOATE, ODR/FLV COMP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sodium benzoate (Benzoic 

acid, sodium salt), (CAS 

No. 532–32–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

2916.31.11) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5295 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- The Clement Group, LLC Under Contract No. W91278-11-D-0029 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61238
Larry S. Logsdon, Esq. Cecil H. Macoy, Jr., Esq.

Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff& Brandt, LLC Birmingham, AL Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Susan K. Weston, Esq.

EngineerTrial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington ORDER OF DISMISSAL By letter dated 30 June 2017, appellant filed a notice ofappeal with the Board. The notice ofappeal statedthat appellant was appealing a contracting officer's final decision, dated 7April 2017, which denied appellant's claim in the amount of$134,255. By letter dated 10 August 2017, the partiesjointly moved to dismiss this appeal without prejudice, indicating that appellant's original submission was not certified as required by the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), and that the contracting officer's response to that submission did not set forth appellant's appeal rights. The parties further indicated that appellant would be submitting additional costs and information to the contracting officer, along with a CDA certification, for the contracting officer's consideration in accordance with the CDA. In view ofthe foregoing, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket without prejudice to the contractor's submission ofa claim to the contracting officer. Dated: 16 August 2017

ministrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCANo. 61238, Appeal ofThe Clement Group, LLC, rendered in conformancewith the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

v. § 

§ 

$9,800.00, MORE OR LESS, IN, § 

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, § 

And § 

$1,097.00, MORE OR LESS, IN § 

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, § 

Defendants. § 

CIVUAO9VC11 194 R 

WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF PROPERTY 

TO THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE OR OTHER AUTHORIZED LAW 

ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ORGANIZATION 

AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENFORCE THE WARRANT: 

WHEREAS a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in rem was filed on February 20, 2020, 

against the following property: 

$9,800.00, more or less, in United States Currency, and 

$1 .097.00, more or less, in United States Currency 

(hereinafter, referred to as Defendant Currency), alleging that the Defendant Currency is subject 

to forfeiture to the United States of America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(6) for violations of 

21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., and 

WHEREAS an Order has been entered by the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Texas that a Warrant for Arrest of Property be issued as prayed for by 

Plaintiff United States of America, 

YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED to arrest the Defendant Currency as soon as 

practicable by serving a copy of this warrant on the custodian in whose possession, custody, or 

control the Defendant Currency is presently found, and to use whatever means may be 

Case 1:20-cv-00194-RP Document 1-4 Filed 02/20/20 Page 1 of 2
appropriate to protect and maintain the Defendant Currency in your custody until further order of 

this Court, including designating a substitute custodian or representative for the purposes of 

maintaining the care and custody of the Defendant Currency and to make a return as provided by 

law. 

SIGNED this day of 

By: 

2020. 

JEANNETTE J. CLACK 

United States District Clerk 

Western District of Texas 

Deputy 

Case 1:20-cv-00194-RP Document 1-4 Filed 02/20/20 Page 2 of 2
----

Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (1)

(Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for oil and gas, designated the ‘Tarbes-Val d'Adour Licence’)

(2006/C 122/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

By request of 3 October 2005, Europa Oil & Gas plc, with registered offices at 25 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AY (United Kingdom), applied for an exclusive five-year licence, designated the ‘Tarbes-Val d'Adour licence’, to prospect for oil and gas in an area of approximately 1 405 km2 forming part of the departments of Pyrénées Atlantiques, Landes, Gers and Hautes Pyrénées.

The perimeter of the area covered by this licence is made up of the meridian and parallel arcs successively joining the points defined below by their geographical coordinates, the original meridian being that of Paris.

The following are excluded from this perimeter:

The area of the Lagrave concession (30,65 km2)

The area of the Castera-Lou concession (26,3 km2)

The area of the Laméac concession (4,4 km2)

Submission of applications

The initial applicant and competing applicants must prove that they comply with the requirements for obtaining the licence, defined in Articles 3, 4 and 5 of Decree No 95-427 of 19 April 1995, as amended, concerning mining rights.

Interested companies may, within ninety days of the publication of this notice, submit a competing application in accordance with the procedure summarised in the ‘Notice regarding the granting of mining rights for hydrocarbons in France’ published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 374 of 30 December 1994, page 11, and established by Decree No 95-427 of 19 April 1995, as amended, concerning mining rights (Journal officiel de la République française, 22 April 1995).

Competing applications must be sent to the Minister responsible for mines at the address below. Decisions on the initial application and competing applications must be taken within two years of the date on which the French authorities received the initial application, i.e. by 10 December 2007 at the latest.

Conditions and requirements regarding performance of the activity and cessation thereof

Applicants are referred to Articles 79 and 79.1 of the mining code and to Decree No 95-696 of 9 May 1995, as amended, on the start of mining operations and the mining regulations (Journal officiel de la République française, 11 May 1995).

Further information can be obtained from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Finance and Industry (Directorate-General for Energy and Raw Materials, Directorate for Energy and Mineral Resources, Bureau of Mining Legislation), 61, boulevard Vincent Auriol, Télédoc 133, F-75703 Paris Cedex 13, France, (tel. (33) 144 97 23 02, fax: (33) 144 97 05 70).

The abovementioned laws and regulations can be consulted at http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr

----

(1)OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

----
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

DROPBOX, INC, 

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA

NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION

Dropbox, Inc. hereby notifies this Court that Dropbox and Motion Offense, LLC have 

agreed to extend the deadline for Dropbox, Inc. to file its motion regarding its proposed bill of 

costs pursuant to Local Rule CV-54(a)(3)(B) to October 17, 2024. The agreed extension will not 

change the date of a hearing, trial or other Court event, and all other deadlines will remain in effect.

September 30, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gregory H. Lantier

Kelly Ransom

Texas State Bar No. 24109427

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP

303 Colorado, Suite 2000

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel: (512) 495-6400

Kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 444 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 3
2

Gregory H. Lantier (pro hac vice)

Amanda L. Major (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

2100 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington DC 20037

Tel: (202) 663-6327

Tel: (202) 663-6304

gregory.lantier@wilmerhale.com

amanda.major@wilmerhale.com

Liv Herriot (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400

Palo Alto, California 94306

Tel: (650) 858-6138

liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com

Makenzi G. Herbst (pro hac vice)

Rauvin A. Johl (pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP

60 State Street

Boston, MA 02109 

Tel: (617) 526-6171

Tel: (617) 526-6104

Tel: (617) 526-6109

makenzi.herbst@wilmerhale.com

rauvin.johl@wilmerhale.com

Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Texas State Bar No. 07921800

GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P.

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Tel: (903) 934-8450

Fax: (903) 934-9257

gil@gillamsmithlaw.com

Attorneys for Dropbox, Inc.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 444 Filed 09/30/24 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on September 30, 2024.

/s/ Kelly Ransom

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 444 Filed 09/30/24 Page 3 of 3
12596322.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

KIRK JOHNSTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHAD KROEGER, MICHAEL KROEGER, 

RYAN PEAKE, DANIEL ADAIR, WARNER 

MUSIC GROUP, ATLANTIC RECORDING 

CORP., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., 

WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., AND

LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 20-CV-00497-RP 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CHAD KROEGER, MICHAEL KROEGER, 

RYAN PEAKE, DANIEL ADAIR, ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., AND WARNER 

CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(B)(6)

After considering Defendants Chad Kroeger, Michael Kroeger, Ryan Peake, Daniel 

Adair, Roadrunner Records, Inc., and Warner Chappell Music, Inc.’s (collectively, 

“Defendants”) Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) (the 

“Motion”), any response by Plaintiff, any additional briefing, and any arguments of counsel, and 

having taken judicial notice of the printouts from the Copyright Public Catalog of the United 

States Copyright Office website attached to the Motion as Exhibits 3-9, the Court finds that 

Defendants’ Motion is meritorious. It is, therefore:

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s copyright 

infringement claim against Defendants is hereby dismissed, in its entirety with prejudice, without 

leave to re-plead.

SIGNED ON ________________, 2020.

HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING

Case 1:20-cv-00497-RP Document 17-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 520 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 

of genetically engineered fish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. WU, Mr. JONES, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

STARK, Mr. HOLT, and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require labeling of genetically engineered fish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, 

4 AND COSMETIC ACT REGARDING GENETI5 CALLY ENGINEERED SALMON. 

6 Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

7 Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is further amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 520 IH

1 ‘‘(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless 

2 the food bears a label stating that the food contains ge3 netically engineered fish.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         798,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,838,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   984,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,257,000
<PP&E>                                     145,949,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,736,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,510,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,547,000
<BONDS>                                     29,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,000
<COMMON>                                        42,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,046,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,510,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,238,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,944,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (197,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                96,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,299,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,260,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,704,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,556,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,535,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4710 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4710

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbonic Acid, Dimethyl Ester, 
                      Polymer with 1,6-Hexanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Guthrie introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbonic Acid, Dimethyl Ester, 
                      Polymer with 1,6-Hexanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBONIC ACID, DIMETHYL ESTER, POLYMER WITH 1,6-HEXANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Carbonic Acid,     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Dimethyl Ester,                                                    31/2015
                          Polymer with 1,6-
                          Hexanediol (CAS
                          No. 101325-00-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                                      13

<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2002-9
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-9


          The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

         (i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
         under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                      Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                                 Dated: March 27,  2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT

                                      14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION 

LINDA JANN LEWIS, MADISON LEE, 

ELLEN SWEETS, BENNY 

ALEXANDER, GEORGE MORGAN, 

VOTO LATINO, TEXAS STATE 

CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION FOR THE 

ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED 

PEOPLE; and TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR 

RETIRED AMERICANS, 

Plaint jffs, 

V. RUTH HUGHS, in her official capacity as 

the Texas Secretary of State, 

Defendant. 

FILED 

JUN 2 6 2020 

CLERK, U.S. QISTRICT 

WESTERN PItRICT OF S 

BY bY 

Civil Action No. 5:20-cv-00577-OLG 

ORDER 

On this day, the Court considered the status of the above-captioned case. On June 22, 

2020, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Law in 

Support (docket no. 20). Under Local Rule CV-7(e)(2), the Secretary of State's response would 

be due on June 29, 2020. However, on June 23, 2020, the Secretary of State filed Defendant's 

Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 

(docket no. 25). Specifically, the Secretary of State requested an extension of the response 

deadline to 7 days following the discovery deadline to be set by the Court, citing in part the 

expert reports required to rebut Plaintiffs' arguments. See docket no. 25. Under Local Rule CV7(e)(2), Plaintiffs' response to this motion is due on June 30, 2020. 

In light of this schedule, the Court hereby VACATES the June 29, 2020 deadline for the 

Secretary's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court ORDERS the 

parties to confer and submit proposed scheduling orders for discovery and briefing for the 

Case 5:20-cv-00577-OLG Document 27 Filed 06/26/20 Page 1 of 2
Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Thursday, July 2, 2020. The Court will issue a scheduling 

order, including resetting the Secretary's response deadline, after consideration of the parties' 

submissions. 

It is so ORDERED 

SIGNED this day of June, 2020. 

ORLANDO L. GARCIA 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2 

Case 5:20-cv-00577-OLG Document 27 Filed 06/26/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.9
 INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2008
 1. Purpose .
  2. Administration .
 Powers of the Administrator




---



##### 



Section 409A of the Code
 3. Shares Subject to the Plan .
 Number of Shares
 Lapsed Awards
 Adjustments in Awards and Authorized Shares
 -2-




---



##### 



Limitations
   4. Eligibility .
 5. Stock Options .
 Grant of Options
 ISOs or NSOs
 Option Exercise Price provided however
 Time of Exercise th
 -3-




---



##### 



Vesting
    th
 Special Rules for 10% Owners
 Payment of Exercise Price
 -4-




---



##### 



By Tender of Stock
 By Cashless Exercise
    Exercise of Option
 Termination of Option
 Termination of Service
 -5-




---



##### 



Regular Termination
 Termination by Disability
 Termination Upon Death
 Termination for Cause
 Award Agreement
 Modification, Extension, and Renewal
 -6-




---



##### 



6. Stock Appreciation Rights .
 Grant of SARs
 Terms and Conditions
 Exercise
 Tandem SARs
 Stand-Alone SARs
 7. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units .
 Grant of Restricted Stock
 Consideration for Awards
 -7-




---



##### 



Vesting and Forfeiture
 Time of Issuance or Payment
 Other Restrictions
 Modification, Extension, and Renewal of Restricted Stock and RSU Awards
 8. Change in Control .
 Optional Assumption or Substitution
 -8-




---



##### 



No Assumption or Substitution  Options and SARs
 No Assumption or Substitution  Restricted Stock and RSUs
 Award Agreement
 9. Securities Law Requirements .
 10. Restrictions on Shares Issued .
 -9-




---



##### 



11. Miscellaneous .
 No Rights to Awards
 No Employment Rights
 No Stockholders Rights
 Transferability
 Claims
 -10-




---



##### 



Attorneys Fees
 Confidentiality
 Corporation Free to Act
 Acquired Company Awards
 Severability
 -11-




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Rules of Exchange
 Competition
 Taxes and Withholding
 Fractional Shares
 Bifurcation
 -12-




---



##### 



12. Right of First Refusal .
 13. Effective Date of the Plan . th
 14. Amendment and Termination of the Plan .
 15. Definitions .
 Administrator
 Applicable Laws
 -13-




---



##### 



Award
 Award Agreement
 Board
 Cause
      Change in Control
  -14-




---



##### 



provided however
   -15-




---



##### 



Code
 Common Stock
 Company
 Corporation
 Disability
 Effective Date of a Change in Control
 Exchange Act
 Fair Market Value
   Grantee
 ISO
 -16-




---



##### 



Listing Date
 NSO
 Option
 Performance Goals
 Plan
 Restricted Stock
 Restricted Stock Unit RSU
 Restriction Period
 Service
 Share
 Stock Appreciation Right SAR
 -17-




---



##### 



/s/ Johnathan H. ShortJohnathan H. Short, Secretary
 -18-