alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN TIMOTHY PEREZ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

GREG LEWIS, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-56441

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03597-SVWMAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and

HELLERSTEIN, Senior District Judge.** 

Petitioner John Timothy Perez appeals the district court’s denial of his

petition for habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Perez raises two

FILED

OCT 25 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
arguments that his petition should not have been dismissed as untimely and we

address each in turn.

Perez is not entitled to an equitable exception to AEDPA’s statute of

limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D), on the basis of “actual innocence,”

McQuiggin v. Perkins, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 1928 (2013); see also Lee v. Lampert, 653

F.3d 929, 932 (9th Cir. 2011). He has not “demonstrate[d] that it is more likely

than not that no reasonable juror would have found him guilty beyond a reasonable

doubt.” Lee, 653 F.3d at 937.

We will assume, arguendo, that Perez is entitled to delayed accrual of his

claim and that he exercised diligence. He concedes, however, that he is not entitled

to statutory tolling while his petition was pending in the California Supreme Court,

because that court dismissed his petition as untimely. See Pace v. DiGuglielmo,

544 U.S. 408, 410 (2005). Perez is, therefore, not entitled to equitable tolling

sufficient to make his habeas petition timely. See Lakey v. Hickman, 633 F.3d 782,

787 (9th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2*****Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002******(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company and Southern CaliforniaWater Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Robert J. Sprowls,Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant./s/ Robert J. SprowlsRobert J. Sprowls
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 5:20-cv-00099-JKP Document 1 Filed 01/27/20 Page 7 of 7
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 49     | 44     | 47    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 61     | 86     | 45     | 49     | 46     | 49     | 42     | 42     | 60     | 43    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 48     | 48     | 52     | 50     | 49     | 51     | 52     | 55     | 51     | 41    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 67     | 73     | 77     | 86     | 95     | 100    | 117    | 112    | 114    | 113   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 93     | 75     | 65     | 62     | 58     | 59     | 51     | 47     | 45     | 47    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 41     | 42     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Custom er Service Hotline: 1
- 800
- 438
- 2474 UNITED STA

TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029
January 13, 2011 Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director Mary land Department of the Environment Air and Radia tion Management Administration 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Mr. Aburn: On December 20, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Mary land State I mplementation Pla n (SI P) fr om the Mary land Department of the Environment. The SI P revision pertains to the definition of “fuel

- burning equipment , ” and includes amendments to Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.01 and Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.09. EPA has determined that the su bmittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Ms. I rene Shandruk, at (215) 814

- 2166. She is the principal conta ct for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division cc: Brian Hug, MDE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto Rodriguez, Also Known as Alberto Rodriquez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered March 23, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 7 Vi to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and an unapprehended accomplice were charged with the robbery of a cabdriver. The cabdriver testified that he picked up defendant and another in the Times Square area, had an opportunity to observe them on one occasion when he ran out of gas and had to refill the tank, and they observed him pay for the gasoline with cash. When he drove them to a Bronx location, they both pulled knives, and stole cash and jewelry. The complainant did not recall that defendant had tattoos on his hand, which were displayed to the jury at trial. The complainant observed defendant at various times after the robbery in the Times Square area, eventually alerting police officers in time to apprehend him.

Defendant, at trial, attempted to exploit various minor inconsistencies in the identification evidence. The jury rejected defendant’s mistaken identity defense. It is well settled that single witness identification can provide the requisite evidence of guilt. *(People v Mobley,*56 NY2d 584.) The various minor inconsistencies were for the jury to resolve, and we do not find their verdict against the weight of the evidence.

Defendant failed to preserve as a matter of law any challenge to the court’s *sua sponte*submission of a no adverse *327inference charge by reason of failure to testify (CPL 300.10), or to the court’s identification charge, and we decline to reach these issues in the interest of justice. Defendant’s challenge to the prosecutor’s summation is similarly unpreserved and does not warrant review. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Kassal, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, )

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Chair of the )

Texas Democratic Party, JOSEPH DANIEL )

CASCINO, SHANDA MARIE SANSING, )

and BRENDA LI GARCIA, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

and )

)

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN )

AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC), and )

TEXAS LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN )

AMERICAN CITIZENS, )

)

Plaintiff-Intervenors, )

)

V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CA-438-FB

)

JOHN B. SCOTT, Texas Secretary of State, )

)

 Defendant. )

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

AND ORDER OF STAY

Before the Court is the status of the above styled and numbered cause. The parties have

indicated they would like to file additional briefing concerning defendant’s motions to dismiss (docket

nos. 150 & 151) which are pending before the Court. After careful consideration, the Court is of the

opinion that a briefing schedule should be set and this case should be stayed pending a ruling on the

motions to dismiss. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant shall file his response to plaintiffs’ and plaintiffintervenors’ supplemental briefing (docket no. 167) on or before March 18, 2022.

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 168 Filed 02/22/22 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors shall file their reply to

defendant’s response to their supplemental briefing on or before April 18, 2022.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the above styled and numbered cause is STAYED pending

further order of the Court. Though stayed, this case will still exist on the docket of this Court and may

be reopened upon request or on the Court's own motion. Parties may continue to file motions and

documents in the case. 

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2021.

 _________________________________________________

 FRED BIERY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 168 Filed 02/22/22 Page 2 of 2
ABEL ACOSTA,CLERK 

WILLIE L.RAY #1210691 

POWLEDGE UNIT 

1400 FM,3452 

PALESTINE,TX. 75803 

AUGUST 31,2015 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

P.O.BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION 

AUSTIN,TEXAS 78711 

Re: WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS 

CAUSE NO.: 007-0396-03-B 

DEAR CLERK: 

THIS IS WILLIE L.RAY,WILL YOU PLEASE ADVISED _ME HAVE MY WRIT 

OF CORAM NOBIS BEEN RECEIVED AS OF AUGUST 17;Z015:IF IT HAVE WILL 

YOU PLEASE SEND ME THE STATUS OF IT. 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME,AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU! 

t.J;,.M.u x. {(,~ RESPECTFULLY YOU , WILLIE L.RAY #12 0691 

RECEIVED IN 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

SEP 02 2015 

· L\ber Acosta, Clerk
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof) — Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land v Keller Holding GmbH

(Case C-471/04) (1)

(Freedom of establishment - Corporation tax - Right of a parent company to deduct costs relating to its shareholdings - Non-deductible financing costs having an economic link with dividends exempt from tax - Dividends distributed by an indirect subsidiary established in a Member State other than that in which the parent company has its seat)

(2006/C 131/35)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land

Defendant: Keller Holding GmbH

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC), Article 58 and Article 73b of the EC Treaty (now Article 48EC and 56 EC) — Corporation tax — Non-deductibility of expenditure having a direct economic link to tax-free profits — Expenditure incurred by a parent company established in a Member State linked to its shareholding in a subsidiary established in the same Member State, in connection with dividends distributed by a second-tier subsidiary which are exempted from tax by virtue of the fact that this latter company is established in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which excludes the possibility of deducting for tax purposes financing costs incurred by a parent company subject to unlimited tax liability in that State in order to acquire holdings in a subsidiary where those costs relate to dividends which are exempt from tax because they are derived from an indirect subsidiary established in another Member State or in a State which is party to the Agreement, whereas such costs may be deducted where they relate to dividends paid by an indirect subsidiary established in the same Member State as that of the place of the registered office of the parent company and which, in reality, also benefit from a tax exemption.

----

(1)OJ C 19, 22.01.2005.

----
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5297 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5297

     To suspend temporarily the duty on rosin and resin acids and 
                          derivatives thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on rosin and resin acids and 
                          derivatives thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROSIN AND RESIN ACIDS AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Rosin and resin     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          acids, and                                                        12/31/2015
                          derivatives
                          thereof; other
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3806.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,305  | 7,211  | 7,526 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 9,100  | 9,307  | 9,758  | 10,227 | 10,482 | 10,617 | 9,756  | 10,023 | 10,308 | 10,744
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9,944  | 9,941  | 10,826 | 10,933 | 10,879 | 12,166 | 12,320 | 13,562 | 13,650 | 14,226
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 16,158 | 18,398 | 20,527 | 21,744 | 22,632 | 23,774 | 23,549 | 29,710 | 31,143 | 35,283
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 35,074 | 35,290 | 30,094 | 33,618 | 27,553 | 20,436 | 20,818 | 21,549 | 21,343 | 17,569
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12,484 | 15,005 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023