alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4956 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Turmeric. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Turmeric. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OLEO TURMERIC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Oleo Turmeric (CAS No. 

8024–37–1) (provided for 

in subheading 3301.90.10) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4956 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wilfredo Perez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J., at *Huntley*hearing, jury trial, and sentence), rendered November 13, 1986, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him to a five-year term of probation and 350 hours of community service, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was arrested and charged in a one-count indictment with the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. A *Huntley*hearing was held outside of the jury’s presence, during the course of the trial, and defendant’s motion to suppress oral statements made at the scene of his arrest was denied by the trial court.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress, on the ground that defendant’s statements were made in response to police questioning, postarrest, and without benefit of *Miranda*warnings. However, the record clearly reveals that, upon observing defendant in possible criminal possession of a weapon on a city street, and having *309secured the defendant and the weapon for safety purposes, the investigating officer properly acted to clarify the nature of a potentially volatile situation by asking defendant if the gun belonged to defendant (to which he replied "yes”), and if defendant had a valid permit for the weapon (to which he replied "no”). Only after such clarification of the situation, did the officer place the defendant under arrest and administer the *Miranda*warnings.

Under these circumstances, the limited, clarifying questioning of defendant by the investigating officer at the scene, despite a custodial setting necessitated by safety considerations, is excepted from the *Miranda*requirements. *(People v Huffman,*41 NY2d 29 [1976].) Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
#### NICHOLS v. STATE.

No. 24816.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., o'f Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for assault with intent to murder; the punishment, ten years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

According to the State’s testimony, appellant, without justification, shot the injured party with a pistol.

Appellant’s theory of self-defense was rejected by the jury.

The facts warrant the jury’s conclusion of guilt.

The sole question presented for review is the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s application for a severance to put Leo Nichols, his brother, upon trial first.

It is sufficient to say that the bill of exception shows that the granting of the application would have required a continuance of the case. A severance will not be granted when to do so would operate to continue the case. Art. 651, C.C.P.; Applegate v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 171, 30 S.W.2d 327; Calloway v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 405, 129 S.W.2d 646.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|No chart available.                                            
|No chart available.                                            
|                                                               
|                                                               
|New York Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CODE OF ETHICS**

**FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS**

**OF EASTERN INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.**

It is the policy of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) that the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller of the Company adhere to and advocate the following principles governing theirprofessional and ethical conduct in the fulfillment of their responsibilities: 

1. Act with honesty and integrity, avoidingactual or apparent conflicts between his or her personal, private interests and the interests of the Company, including receiving improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position. 

2. Perform assigned responsibilities with a view to causing periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“SEC”) to contain information that is accurate, complete, fair, and understandable. 

3. Comply with laws offederal, state, and local governments applicable to the Company, and the rules and regulations of private and public regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the Company. 

4. Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, and diligence, without misrepresenting or omitting material facts or allowingindependent judgment to be compromised. 

5. Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of performinghis or her responsibilities except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Do not use confidential information acquired in the course of performing his or her responsibilities for personal advantage. 

6. Proactively promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers. 

7. Use corporate assets and resources employed or entrusted in a responsible manner. 

8. Do not use corporate information, corporate assets, corporate opportunities, or one’s position with the Company for personal gain.Do not compete directly or indirectly with the Company. 

9. Comply in all respects with the Company’s Policy onMaterial Non Public Information and Personal Investing for Directors, Executive Officers, and Affiliates. 

10. Advance theCompany’s legitimate interests when the opportunity arises. 

It is also the policy of the Company that the CEO, CFO, and Controlleracknowledge and annually certify to the foregoing and file a copy of such certification with the Audit Committee of the Board. 

TheNominating/Governance Committee shall have the power to monitor, make determinations, and recommend action to the Board with respect to violations of this policy, except for paragraph 2, with respect to which the Audit Committee shall have suchpower.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CASE NO. A-20-CR-077 LY

§

ALLEN FORREST COOK (1), §

GLEN RICHARD JOHNSON, III (2), §

Defendants. §

ADVISORY TO THE COURT REGARDING FORFEITURE

TO THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

The United States files this Advisory to the Court Regarding Forfeiture in which the 

United States advised the Court that no further judicial forfeiture proceedings are necessary as to 

the Subject Properties in this case. In support thereof, the United States respectfully advised the 

Court as follows:

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendants ALLEN FORREST COOK (1) and GLEN RICHARD JOHNSON (2) were 

charged by a two-count Indictment with Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine 

and Possession of a Firearm by a Felon. (Doc. 1). The Indictment also contained a Notice of 

Demand for Forfeiture, seeking forfeiture of the following:

• Interarms Model Firestar Plus, 9mm caliber, semi-automatic pistol;

• Any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, 

directly or indirectly, as the result of such violations; and all firearms, 

ammunition, and/or

• Any of the person’s property used, and/or used, in any manner or part, to commit, 

or to facilitate the commission of, such violations;

(hereinafter referred to collectively as “Subject Properties”).
2

II. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WILL BE DISPOSED BY APD

The United States hereby advises the Court that the Subject Firearm is in the custody of 

the Austin Police Department (APD). The APD will dispose of the Subject Properties pursuant 

to their procedures at the conclusion of this case. Therefore, the United States respectfully 

advises the Court that the United States no longer seeks judicial forfeiture of the Subject Firearm.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN F. BASH

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s/ ROBERT ALMONTE II _______

ROBERT ALMONTE II

Assistant United States Attorney

Texas Bar #24049479

903 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 334

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel: (512) 916-5858

Fax: (512) 916-5854

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 5, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument 

was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will transmit 

notification of such to the following CM/ECF participant:

Jose I. Gonzalez-Falla via Email: jose_gonzalez-falla@fd.org

(Attorney for Defendant GLEN RICHARD JOHNSON, III (2))

Additionally at this time, no attorney has been appointed to receive notice, as to 

Defendant Allen Forrest Cook (1)

/s/ ROBERT ALMONTE II_______ 

ROBERT ALMONTE II

Assistant United States Attorney
#### COBB v. STATE.

No. 23475.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1946.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of murder without malice and assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without bills of exception or a statement of facts. The proceedings are regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|U.S. Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|U.S. Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6,586  | 845    | 908    | 1,062  | 987    | 2,071  | 1,960  | 1,350  | 938    | 678   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,469  | 1,884  | 2,150  | 2,843  | 4,589  | 3,166  | 4,469  | 7,673  | 8,828  | 9,804 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 71,078 | 16,075 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

v.

GREGORY JAMES,

Defendant

§

§

§

§

§

§

 Case No. 1:20-CR-00081-LY

Second Order Granting Motion for Modification of Conditions of Release

Before the Court is Defendant Gregory James’s Motion for Modification of Conditions of 

Release, filed on December 10, 2020 (Dkt. 42). The District Court referred the Motion to the 

undersigned Magistrate Judge for resolution on December 14, 2020 (Dkt. 44).

Pursuant to the Court’s Order issued December 15, 2020 (Dkt. 47), Defendant’s Supervising 

Pretrial Services Officer has determined that Defendant remains in compliance with all of his 

conditions of release. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Paragraph 7(q) of Defendant’s 

Additional Conditions of Release (Dkt. 37) is AMENDED to remove Defendant’s location 

monitoring condition. All other conditions of release remain as previously ordered.

SIGNED on January 20, 2021.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cr-00081-LY Document 48 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.B****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2005, of Southern Natural GasCompany (the “Company”) as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify (i) that theReport fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Greg G. Gruber           Greg G. Gruber *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* *and Treasurer* *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*August 5, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Southern Natural GasCompany and will be retained by Southern Natural Gas Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
Order entered October 17 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00760
- CR
BERNARD ANDRE EDWARD S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 1476339
- Y



### O RDER
Before the court are appellant’s O ctober 13 , 2016 pro se motion to designate additional
exhibits and motion for extension of time to file a brief. Because the repor t’ s record filed September 6, 2016 c ertified exhibit s volume as complete , we DENY appellant’s motion to designate additional exhibits.
We GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief and exten d the
time to DECEM BER 1 , 2016. We cauti on appellant that no further extension will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.B
 
 
 
  
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
     
 /s/ John R. SultJohn R. SultExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Southern Natural Gas CompanyAugust 6, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Natural Gas Company and will be retained by Southern Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99
                                                                      ----------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Paragon Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Paragon
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                     /s/ William R. Johnson
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                         William R. Johnson
                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                         May 14, 2003




                     /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                         Ronald J. Semanick
                         Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                           and Treasurer
                         May 14, 2003
|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History: Annual                          
|View History: Annual                          
|View History:                                 
|                                              
|Virginia Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                              
|                                              
|Virginia Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 4      | 4      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023