alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse McLean, VA 22102 Tel: 703.336.8800 mckennalong.com Northern Virgin ia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

MARK E

. MCKINNON
703.336.870 8 EMAIL ADDRESS

m mckinnon f@mckennalong.com

May 13

, 201 5

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA

- 2015

- 0048

– Amendment to Exemption 11345

Dear Gentlemen :

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act o f 2012 ("Reform Act") and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, P recisionHawk USA, Inc.

, hereby submits the following amendment to its Petition for Exemption granted on April 16, 2015

.
The Petition for Exemption was filed on behalf of "PrecisionHaw k Inc." Due to a transcription error, the word USA was inadvertently omitted. The correct name of the petitioner is, in fact, "PrecisionHawk USA, Inc." Accordingly, petitioner respectfully request s that the Grant of Exemption be amended , and that all re ferences to "PrecisionHawk Inc. " be replaced with "PrecisionHawk USA, Inc."

PrecisionHawk USA, Inc. does not seek any changes to any of the conditions or limitations in the original grant. As such, this amendment is suitable for approval through a
Summa ry Grant. In addition, the requested amendment is in the public interest, as having the petitioner correctly identified in the Grant of Exemption will avoid confusion and further the
FAA's interests in accountability

.
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to
call.

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE

Mark E. McKinnon, Esq.
**Exhibit15**

**(KPMG LLPLetterhead)**

November 9, 2006

Southwest Water CompanyLos Angeles, California

**Re: Registration Statements (Nos. 333-18513,333-38935, 333-39506, 333-39508, 333-109444, 333-117713, and 333 134575) onForm S-8 and the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-77881, 333-35252, 333-63196,333-69662, 333 70194, 333-106506, 333-111586, 333-121426, and 333-133399) onForm S-3**

With respect to the subject registration statements,we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 9,2006 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933(the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statementprepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or areport prepared or certified by an independent registered public accountingfirm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California

                                                                                                                                                                                                                

----
#### Coleman, Appellant, *v.*Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Street Railway Company.

*Negligence*— Street *railways*— Automobiles—Automobile *stalled on tracks*— Collision—Contributory *negligence.*

In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between one of defendant’s cars and an automobile stalled on the defendant’s tracks, judgment n. o. v. was properly entered for the defendant where it appeared that the night was dark and foggy, that the plaintiff remained in the automobile with the knowledge that it was on the street railway track, and that her chauffeur, who went back along the track for some distance, failed in his effort to stop the approaching car.

Argued Oct. 12, 1915.

Appeal, No. 60, Oct, T., 1915, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 1720, for defendant n. o. y., in case of Mary A. 'Coleman v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Street Railway Company.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart and Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Shafer, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Verdict for plaintiff for $1,520.00. The court subsequently entered judgment for defendant n. o. v. Plaintiff appealed.

*499January 3, 1916:

*Error assigned*was in entering judgment for defendant n. o. v.

*U. G. Yogan,*of *Miller, Yogan and "Nesbitt,*for appellant.

*Walter Lyon,*for appellee, was not heard.

Per Curiam,

The machinery of the automobile in which the plaintiff below was riding got out of order, and it stopped about midnight on one of the tracks of the defendant company. The night was foggy and very dark. After nearly an hour’s effort to push the automobile off the track, the chauffeur, remembering that a car of the defendant company was about due, went back along the track for some distance for the purpose of stopping it; but, after making all proper efforts to do so, failed. During this time the appellant first got out of the automobile and then went back into it. She admitted that she knew it was still upon the street railway track. While in it the car of the defendant, which the appellant’s chauffeur tried to stop, struck the automobile, and she was injured. A clearer case of contributory negligence is not to be well imagined, and the learned court below correctly so concluded in ordering judgment to be entered for the defendant, non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       <S><C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                       292
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                       103
<INVENTORY>                                        260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,371
<PP&E>                                          47,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,081
<BONDS>                                          6,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,381
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,101
<SALES>                                            188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,432
<CGS>                                              194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,022
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4850 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4850

  To allow for innovations and alternative technologies that meet or 
                exceed desired energy efficiency goals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow for innovations and alternative technologies that meet or 
                exceed desired energy efficiency goals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enabling Energy Saving Innovations 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES.

    Section 342(f) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6313(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraphs (2) through 
        (5)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (2) through (6)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Innovative component technologies.--Subparagraph (C) 
        of paragraph (1) shall not apply to a walk-in cooler or walk-in 
        freezer component if the component manufacturer has 
        demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the 
        component reduces energy consumption at least as much as if 
        such subparagraph were to apply. In support of any 
        demonstration under this paragraph, a manufacturer shall 
        provide to the Secretary all data and technical information 
        necessary to fully evaluate its application.''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                         
|California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                         
|California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 113    | 21     | 36     | 20     | 145    | 239    | 165    | 237    | 24     | 83    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 44     | 97     | 27     | 1,159  | 13     | 0      | 0      | 12     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 23579.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANA HARLEY AND PAUL P. BUTLER

v.

RIDERS' CLUB COOPERATIVE AND

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY

PETITION OF: RIDERS' CLUB

COOPERATIVE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 633 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




In connection with the annual report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 7, 2011
/s/ Sam Shlomo Elimelech

Sam Shlomo Elimelech, PresidentDated: February 7, 2011
/s/ Gai Mar-Chaim

Gai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer

(principal financial officer)
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



<PAGE>



                                 CERTIFICATION


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
             2005-B;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.


             Date: March 24, 2006


                                                 /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                 ----------------
                                                 Steve Bailey
                                                 Senior Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58748-58752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-16]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-16 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: September 26, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[[Page 58749]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02OC00.013


[[Page 58750]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02OC00.014


[[Page 58751]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02OC00.015


[[Page 58752]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02OC00.016

[FR Doc. 00-25102 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|New Mexico--West Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|New Mexico--West Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 10     | 7      | 9      | 7      | 12     | 13     | 1      | 3      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 6      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00101

- CR

Dammond Defferal Johnson

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 235th District Court

o f Cooke County (13

- 00441 )

August 25 , 2016

Opinio n by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_____________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth