alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order issued December /~ , 2012

In The

No. 05-12-01576-CV

JUDITH KAREN BESHEARS, Appellant

Vo

DONALD BESHEARS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Coilin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-52873-98

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s November 29, 2012 motion for an extension of time to file an.

affidavit of indigence. The affidavit of indigence filed with the trial court on November 29, 2012

is deemed timely filed.

JUSTICE
#### HENSON v. STATE.

No. 24254.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goéns, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*416GRAVES, Judge.

Upon an indictment charging the primary offense of burglary and alleging two prior convictions for felonies less than capital, the appellant was sentenced to confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

The record is .before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
State Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Texas Democratic Party, Gilbert Hinojosa, §

Chair of the Texas Democratic Party, §

Joseph Daniel Cascino, Shanda Marie §

Sansing, and Brenda Li Garcia, §

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 5:20-CV-00438-FB

§

Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, §

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, §

Ruth Hughs, Texas Secretary of State, §

Dana Debeauvoir, Travis County Clerk, and §

Jacquelyn F. Callanen, Bexar County §

Elections Administrator, §

Defendants. §

STATE DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL

Defendants Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, Ruth Hughs, Texas Secretary of State, and Ken 

Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth 

Circuit from the Court’s Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 90), 

entered on May 19, 2020.

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 91 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 3
State Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 2

Respectfully submitted.

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

JEFFREY C. MATEER

First Assistant Attorney General

RYAN L. BANGERT

Deputy First Assistant Attorney General

DARREN L. MCCARTY

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation

THOMAS A. ALBRIGHT

Chief for General Litigation Division

/s/Michael R. Abrams

MICHAEL R. ABRAMS

Texas Bar No. 24087072

ANNE MARIE MACKIN

Texas Bar No. 24078898

CORY A. SCANLON

Texas Bar No. 24104599

Assistant Attorneys General

Office of the Attorney General

General Litigation Division

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

(512) 463-2120 | FAX: (512) 320-0667

michael.abrams@oag.texas.gov

anna.mackin@oag.texas.gov

cory.scanlon@oag.texas.gov

Counsel for State Defendants 

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 91 Filed 05/19/20 Page 2 of 3
State Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 19, 2020 a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

served via the Court’s CM/ECF system to all counsel of record.

/s/ Michael R. Abrams

MICHAEL R. ABRAMS

Assistant Attorney General

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 91 Filed 05/19/20 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 4.1

                        SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE

Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of North Carolina

This Certifies that _____________ is the owner of ________________ fully paid
and nonassessable shares of the common stock of the par value $1.00 each of
Crescent Financial Corporation transferable on the books of the Corporation by
the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney on surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed.

This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer
Agent and Registrar.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated: _______________________

_______________________                 _______________________
Corporate Secretary                     President and Chief Executive Officer

________________________________________________________________________________

CRESCENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

The Corporation is authorized to issue preferred stock with such designations,
relative rights, preferences and limitations as may be determined by the Board
of Directors. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series. Upon
written request of any shareholder, the Corporation will forward, without
charge, the information regarding the preferred stock.

KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILIATED OR
DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO
THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
common
UGMA/UTMA -- _______ Custodian _________ under Uniform Gifts/Transfers to
Minors Act _____ (State)

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the above list.

For value received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto __________
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint ___________ attorney to transfer the said
stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated _____________

Signature(s) Guaranteed ______________________
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5157 

To prohibit the designation of Vietnam under title V of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California (for herself, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the designation of Vietnam under title V of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fostering Rights 

5 through Economic Engagement in Vietnam Act’’ or 

6 ‘‘FREE Vietnam Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5157 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DESIGNATION OF VIETNAM 

2 UNDER TITLE V OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 502(b) of the Trade Act 

4 of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(3) VIETNAM.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

8 countries listed in paragraph (1), Vietnam may 

9 not be designated as a beneficiary developing 

10 country for purposes of this title unless the 

11 President submits to Congress a certification 

12 described in subparagraph (B). 

13 ‘‘(B) CERTIFICATION.—A certification re14 ferred to in subparagraph (A) is a certification 

15 that contains a determination of the President 

16 that— 

17 ‘‘(i) Vietnam is not on the special 

18 watch list under section 110(b)(3)(A) of 

19 the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

20 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7107(b)(3)(A)); 

21 ‘‘(ii) the Government of Vietnam does 

22 not engage in pervasive violations of inter23 nationally-recognized human rights, includ24 ing freedom of speech and freedom of reli25 gion; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5157 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) Vietnam otherwise meets the re2 quirements of this title. 

3 ‘‘(C) WAIVER.—The President may waive 

4 the application of subparagraph (A) if the 

5 President determines and certifies to Congress 

6 that it is in the national interest of the United 

7 States to do so.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT B 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 1-2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 5
1 

NCS’s U.S. Patent No. 10,465,445 (“the ’445 Patent”) and the Innovex Casing Floatation Device

Claim 28 of the ’445 Patent Innovex Casing Floatation Device1

28.0 A float tool configured for use in positioning a 

casing string in a wellbore containing a well fluid, 

the casing string having an internal diameter that 

defines a fluid passageway between an upper 

portion of the casing string and a lower portion of 

the casing string, the float tool comprising: 

Innovex markets a floatation system for use in a casing string placed in 

a wellbore: 

The casing string has an internal diameter for passing fluid between an 

upper portion of the casing (below in green) and lower portion of the 

casing (below in red): 

1 All references to the Innovex Casing Floatation System are found at https://innovex-inc.com/completions/float-subs/. 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 1-2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 5
2 

28.1 a rupture disc assembly comprising (i) a tubular 

member having an upper end and a lower end, the 

upper and lower ends configured for connection 

in-line with the casing string and 

See element 28.0. A casing floatation device (i.e. a “rupture disc 

assembly”) is connected to the casing string. The casing floatation 

device has a tubular member that has an upper end (below in blue) and 

a lower end (below in orange). The upper and lower ends of the 

casing floatation device are connected in-line with the casing string: 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 1-2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 3 of 5
3 

28.2 (ii) a rupture disc having a rupture burst pressure 

and in sealing engagement with a region of the 

tubular member within the upper and lower ends 

The casing floatation device (i.e. “rupture disc assembly”) includes a 

rupture disc (below in purple), and the disc is in sealing engagement

(below in black) within the upper and lower ends of the device: 

28.3 wherein the rupture disc is configured to disengage 

from sealing engagement when exposed to a 

pressure greater than a hydraulic pressure in the 

casing string after the casing string has been 

positioned in the wellbore 

See element 28.2. The rupture disc is ruptured by an applied surface 

pressure:

The rupture disc disengages from the sealing engagement when it is 

exposed to an applied surface pressure that is greater than the hydraulic 

pressure in the casing string. 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 1-2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 4 of 5
4 

28.4 and the region of the tubular member where the 

rupture disc is attached has a larger internal 

diameter than the internal diameter of the casing 

string and is parallel to the internal diameter of the 

casing string.

The casing floatation device rupture disc (see element 28.2) is 

positioned in a region of the casing floatation device that has a larger 

internal diameter (below in gold) than the internal diameter of the 

casing string (below in pink), and is parallel to the internal diameter of 

the casing string: 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 1-2 Filed 04/08/20 Page 5 of 5
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Otis Lee Simmons, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After executing a waiver of indictment, defendant entered a guilty plea to a superior court information which charged him with attempted rape in the first degree. The waiver contained a provision that defendant waived his right to appeal from any judgment of conviction under the superior court information.

We reject the People’s argument that defendant waived his right to appeal. Waiver is the intentional and voluntary relinquishment of a known right, and knowledge and intent are essential elements *(People v Cox,*71 AD2d 798). The record fails to disclose any inquiry by the court from which we could determine that defendant knowingly waived his right to appeal *(see, People v Veaudry,*133 AD2d 524, *lv denied*70 NY2d 804). Defendant’s "understanding and acceptance” of the purported waiver has not been demonstrated *(People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11).

Defendant contends on appeal that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. The evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, when viewed in their totality at the time of the representation, demonstrate that defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation *(see, People v Jackson,*70 NY2d 768, 769; *People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147).

Finally, there is no merit to defendant’s argument that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record demonstrates that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered. (Appeal from judgment of *925Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Merrell, J.—attempted rape, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000090168
<NAME> SIFCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,754
<PP&E>                                          22,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,883
<CGS>                                           40,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (18)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                       762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
M ARJORIE K. C ONNER

A TTORNEY

700 W EST V IEW T ERRACE

A LEXANDRIA

, V IRGINIA 22302

M AY 12, 2015

703-706-5917 mkconner@mkconnerlaw.com

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: CellAntenna Corporation Petition for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Ac t Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1010

Dear USDOT:

CellAntenna Corporation (“CellA ntenna”) hereby supplements its petition for exemption filed pursuant to Section 333 of t he FAA Modernization and Refo rm Act of 2012 (“Reform Act”), and Section 11.81 of the F AA’s rules, 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, in the Regulatory Docket Number captioned above.

By this supplement, CellAntenna pr ovides the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. fixed wing, rotorcraft , lighter-than-air) fo r the proposed UAS operation.

CellAntenna proposes to use a four different aircraft, but the maximum weight (including payload) on any flight will be 55 pounds or less. CellAntenna’ s proposed aircraft are:

DJI S1000 Spreading Wings DJI 450 Flame Wheel Quadcopter DJI Inspire DJI 550 Flame Wheel Hexacopter

The manual for each of these air craft was provided in the orig inal filing.

Please give me a call with a ny questions or concerns about OSD ’s petitions or this letter.

Very truly yours,

Marjorie K. C onner C ounsel for CellAntenna Corporation

cc: CellAntenna Corporation
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 1      | 1      | -1     | -710   | -1     | 22     | -25    | -18    | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0179

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DOMINGO JOSE PALAFOX, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 20, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2021

09/13/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0179
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1071

_____________________________

JEFFNEY PHILISTIN,

Appellant,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, 

Dept. of Corr.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Ana Maria Garcia, Judge.

March 14, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jeffney Philistin, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

EL PASO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS, 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CR-00389-DCG 

 

 

ORDER SETTING STATUS HEARING 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is SET for a 

STATUS HEARING via Zoom to discuss certain budgetary issues with the parties, the 

Honorable Sam Medrano, Jr., Judge of the 409th District Court, El Paso County, Texas, and Ms. 

Margaret Alverson, the Fifth Circuit CJA Case Budgeting Attorney, on Monday, October 19, 

2020, at 3:00 P.M. MST. Defendant’s presence is not required at this hearing. 

 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of October 2020.

____________________________________ 

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 158 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 1