alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONCRETE CASTING INCORPORATED





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concrete Casting Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
Kevin J. AsherKevin J. AsherChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting OfficerMay 17, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concrete Casting Incorporated and will be retained by Concrete Casting Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 362    | 270    | 139    | 29     | 283    | 255    | 195    | 309    | 108    | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30     | 634    | 195    | 426    | 1,267  | 79     | 268    | 149    | 249    | 456   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 197    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Ex parte Robert JONES.

No. 27396.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1954.

Martin & Shown, Houston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Relator again applies for writ of habeas corpus, seeking his release from the Texas Prison System. In Ex parte Jones, Tex. Cr.App., 240 S.W.2d 776, we held that an order of cumulation made by the District Court of Jefferson County was ineffectual. We also suggested to relator that he again apply to this Court for writ of habeas corpus when he could show.that he had served the Jefferson County term.

This he has now done and is entitled to be released.

It is so ordered. .
FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ May 17, 2022 Jennifer Clark

Case 6:20-cv-00376-ADA Document 230 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
99.7






CERTIFICATION


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND


SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Claude
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.




I,
Neil McMillan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated: March
28, 2008


/s/ Neil
      McMillanName: Neil
      McMillan
                Title:   President
      and Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4864 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,2-Propanediol, 3-(diethylamino)- 

, polymers with 5-isocyanato-1- (isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3- 

trimethylcyclohexane, propylene glycol and reduced Me esters of reduced 

polymd. oxidized tetrafluoroethylene, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol-blocked, acetates 

(salts). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,2-Propanediol, 

3-(diethylamino)-, polymers with 5-isocyanato-1- 

(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane, propylene 

glycol and reduced Me esters of reduced polymd. oxidized 

tetrafluoroethylene, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol-blocked, acetates 

(salts). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4864 IH

1 SECTION 1. 1,2-PROPANEDIOL, 3-(DIETHYLAMINO)-, POLY2 MERS WITH 5-ISOCYANATO-1- 

3 (ISOCYANATOMETHYL)-1,3,3- 

4 TRIMETHYLCYCLOHEXANE, PROPYLENE GLY5 COL AND REDUCED ME ESTERS OF REDUCED 

6 POLYMD. OXIDIZED TETRAFLUORO7 ETHYLENE, 2-ETHYL-1-HEXANOL-BLOCKED, 

8 ACETATES (SALTS). 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

11 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

12 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,2-Propanediol, 3- 

(diethylamino)-, polymers 

with 5-isocyanato-1- 

(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3- 

trimethylcyclohexane, propylene glycol and reduced 

Me esters of reduced 

polymd. oxidized tetrafluoroethylene, 2-ethyl-1- 

hexanol-blocked, acetates 

(salts) (CAS No. 328389– 

90–8) (provided for in subheading 3907.20.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

15 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. ("Enbridge Management"), hereby certifies that the Enbridge
Management's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Enbridge Management.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Enbridge Management and will be retained by Enbridge Management and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:
February 21, 2008

|/s/MARK A. MAKIMark A. Maki Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer) |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00108-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on March 22, 2022 at 02:15 PM.

set

IT 22nd day of March, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 119 Filed 03/22/22 Page 1 of 1
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, W. JAMES SCILACCI, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, of Southern
California Edison Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants' most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 5, 2004

                                               /s/ W. JAMES SCILACCI
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                                 W. JAMES SCILACCI
                                 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
#### HALL v. STATE.

No. 23826.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of murder without malice. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of four years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:









a.
            Registration
      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145390),
and




b.
            Registration
      Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-157663);





of Eagle
Bulk Shipping Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 5,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Bulk
Shipping Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





New York,
New York


March 5,
2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, )

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Chair of the )

Texas Democratic Party, JOSEPH DANIEL )

CASCINO, SHANDA MARIE SANSING, )

and BRENDA LI GARCIA, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CA-438-FB

)

GREG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, )

KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, )

RUTH HUGHS, Texas Secretary of )

State, DANA DEBEAUVOIR, Travis )

County Clerk, and JACQUELYN F. )

CALLANEN, Bexar County Elections )

Administrator, )

)

 Defendants. )

SECOND ORDER FOR ADVISORY

Before the Court is the status of the above styled and numbered cause, which has been stayed

pending the conclusion of interlocutoryappellate proceedings. On June 16, 2020, after the Fifth Circuit

stay panel issued a stay of the preliminary injunction order signed by this Court, plaintiffs filed a

petition for writ of certiorari before judgment with the Supreme Court. While it was pending, the Fifth

Circuit merits panel vacated the injunction and remanded this case. Thereafter, plaintiffs asked the

Supreme Court to treat the earlier filed petition for writ of certiorari as a post-judgment petition. In

response to an inquiry from this Court, counsel suggested that proceedings in this Court remain stayed

until the Supreme Court resoled the petition for writ of certiorari. See State Defendants’ Advisory

(docket no. 122, pages 1-2) (“The Supreme Court’s disposition . . . is certain to influence the remainder

of this litigation, and it would therefore promote judicial economy and preserve the parties’ resources

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 125 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 2
for the appellate proceedings on [the] question [of whether Section 82.003 of the Texas Election Code

violates the Twenty-Sixth Amendment] to fully and finally conclude before the parties reengage in this

Court.”); Plaintiffs’ Advisory to the Court (docket no. 123, page 2) (“In the event the petition is granted,

additional proceedings will ensue before the Supreme Court. In the event the petition is denied, the case

will resume before this Court, on remand, for further proceedings.”). The docket sheet reflects that the

petition was denied on January 11, 2021. See (docket no. 124, page 2) (“The petition for writ of

certiorari before judgment is denied.”). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that counsel shall confer and file, on or before February 22,

2021, an advisory indicating whether the interlocutory appellate proceedings are complete and, if so,

their insights on how this case should proceed in compliance with the Fifth Circuit’s order of remand.

(Docket no. 120, page 39) (“We VACATE the injunction and REMAND for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.”). The Court specifically inquires whether Jacquelyn F. Callanen, Bexar

County Elections Administrator, should remain a party-defendant in this case. 

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 21st day of January, 2021.

 _________________________________________________

 FRED BIERY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 5:20-cv-00438-FB Document 125 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 5:20-cv-00267   Document 3   Filed 03/05/20   Page 1 of 3

Case 5:20-cv-00267   Document 3   Filed 03/05/20   Page 2 of 3

Case 5:20-cv-00267   Document 3   Filed 03/05/20   Page 3 of 3
RESOLUTION OF THE COMPENSATION AND EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL

                    COMMITTEES OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF

                            EDISON INTERNATIONAL AND

                       SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

                           Adopted: February 17, 2000

                               RE: Plan Deviation


     WHEREAS,  Alan J.  Fohrer has been  elected as chief  executive  officer of
Edison Mission Energy; and

     WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the benefits that would be payable under
the  nonqualified  executive  benefit  plans of the  companies  in the event Mr.
Fohrer's  employment is  terminated  prior to age 55 as a result of his death or
disability  be  determined  as if he had attained age 55, and the members of the
Committees having conferred thereon;

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  BE IT RESOLVED,  that the nonqualified  executive benefit
plans of the companies in which Mr. Fohrer  participates  shall be  administered
and applied with respect to him as provided above.

      Charles D. Miller
---------------------------------
      Charles D. Miller
Chairman of the Committees


        M. D. McDonald
---------------------------------
        M. D. McDonald
Counsel
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7886
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-777-6-0AK) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 29, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommen dation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate r eview. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Docket Number FAA-2013-0519

Directorate ID 2010-SW-068-AD

AD Number 2013-20-17

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 80 helicopters of U.S. Registry.

Based on an average labor rate of $85 per hour, we estimate that operators will incur the 

following costs in order to comply with this AD. Amending the RFM will require about 

0.5 work-hour, for a cost per helicopter of about $43 and a cost to U.S. operators of 

$3,440. Installing the decal will require about 0.2 work-hour, and required parts will cost 

about $5, for a cost per helicopter of $22 and a cost to U.S. operators of $1,760. Based on 

these estimates, the total cost of this AD is $65 per helicopter and $5,200 for the U.S. 

operator fleet.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

The following
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful
misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:



| | (i) | This Current Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Control, Inc. for the period ended May 31, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrum Control, Inc.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated as of this 25th day of June 2010.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A. SOUTHWORTH          |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN P. FREEMAN                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spectrum Control, Inc. and will be retained by Spectrum Control, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



35