alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4993 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4993

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                               for women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. Bonamici introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                               for women.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Footwear for        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          women, with                                                       12/31/2015
                          uppers of leather
                          other than of
                          pigskin (other
                          than work
                          footwear, tennis
                          shoes, basketball
                          shoes, gym shoes,
                          training shoes
                          and the like, and
                          other than slip-
                          on footwear),
                          covering the
                          ankle, valued $27/
                          pair or higher,
                          designed to be
                          worn in lieu of,
                          but not over,
                          other footwear as
                          a protection
                          against water,
                          oil, grease or
                          chemicals or cold
                          or inclement
                          weather where
                          such protection
                          includes
                          protection
                          against water
                          that is imparted
                          by the use of a
                          coated or
                          laminated textile
                          fabric (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6403.91.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PASTIFICIO LUCIO GAROFALO, S.P.A.

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

AMERICAN ITALIAN PASTA COMPANY, 

DAKOTA GROWERS PASTA COMPANY, 

and NEW WORLD PASTA COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

____________________ 

2011-1533 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in 

consolidated Case Nos. 10-CV-0095 and 10-CV-0097, Judge Donald C. 

Pogue. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

RICHARD P. FERRIN, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, of Washington, 

DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was DOUGLAS 

J. HEFFNER. 

CARRIE A. DUNSMORE, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With 

her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE 
E. DAVIDSON, Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., Assistant 

Director. 

DAVID C. SMITH, JR., Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP of Washington, 

DC, argued for defendant-appellee American Italian Pasta Company, 

et al. With him on the brief was PAUL C. ROSENTHAL. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX, INC.,

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant,

v.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Defendant/CounterPlaintiff.

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPBOX, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00758-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

In support of its Motion to Strike Dropbox, Inc.’s Inequitable Conduct Defense, (D.I. 

127), Motion Offense, LLC respectfully submits this notice of supplemental authority regarding 

a recent decision in the Western District of Texas in Applied Biokinetics LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, 

Inc., No. 6:21-cv-555-ADA, Dkt. 80 (Apr. 21, 2022), attached as Exhibit 1, for the Court’s 

consideration.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 131 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 2
Dated: April 25, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC

/s/ Timothy Devlin

Timothy Devlin (No. 4241)

Derek Dahlgren (pro hac vice)

Mariam Clayton (pro hac vice)

1526 Gilpin Avenue

Wilmington, DE 19806

Phone: (302) 449-9010

Fax: (302) 353-4251

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com

ddahlgren@devlinlawfirm.com

mclayton@devlinlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Motion Offense, LLC 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 131 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Origin Agritech Limited

No. 21 Sheng Ming Yuan Road

Changping
District

Beijing 102206

China





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form 5-8 (File No. 333-166226 and 333-145865) and F-3 (File No. 333-166236) of Origin Agritech Limited and its subsidiaries
and variable interest entities of our dated January 8, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness
of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 20-F.









BDO China Shu Lun Pan Certified Public
Accountants LLP



Shenzhen, The People's Republic of China

January 8, 2013
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5,763  | 10,597 | 19,116 | 13,904
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6,904  | 15,490 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
® 

BERGESON & CAMPBELL, P.C . 

p. 1 

0PF7_-,,2W9-,9c710,, 

1203 Nineteenth Street, NW I Suite 300 j Washington, DC 1 20036-2401 I tel 202.557 .3800 1 fax 202 .557 .3836 1 web www.lawbc.com 

April 23, 2010 

Via Hand Delivery 

OPPT Document Control Office 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA East Building, Room 6428 

1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

ATTN: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0918 

c:. 

Re : Proposed SNUR for 1-Propene, 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro- ; Docket ID No. EPAHQ-OPPT-2008-0918 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Enclosed is a CD-ROM that contains two video clips in connection with a 

presentation entitled Presentation to EPA on Exposure and Risk Assessment of HFO-1234yf ~that 

was presented to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) representatives on April 13, 

2010, by Susan Hunter Youngren, Ph.D. on behalf of the Automotive Refrigeration Products 

Institute and Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association and thereafter submitted to the 

docket . Please add these video clips to the docket . 

If you have questions regarding this submission, or require additional information, 

please call (202) 557-3801 or e-mail lbergeson@lawbc.com. 

Lynn L. Bergeson 

Attachment 

tONTAINS NO CBI 

0175 .001 / 6 / 00059481 .DOC 

,3a ~ 4 10
#### THOMAS J. MURPHY v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.1

October 20, 1911.

Nos. 17,333—(58).

Damages.

Action for personal injury. Plaintiff, twenty-seven years old, sustained a most painful and serious injury. The evidence justified the inference that he would never fully recover, and the injury would seriously impair his health, happiness and ability to do manual labor, which had been his principal occupation. *Held:*A verdict for $5,000 was not excessive. [Reporter.]

*540Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $10,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Kelly, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $5,000. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, it appealed.

Affirmed.

*M. L. Countryman,*for appellant.

. *Patrick J. Ryan,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 132 N. W. 750.

Pek Cup.iam.

This is an appeal in a unique personal injury action, in that the defendant by its answer frankly admitted its liability, and put in issue only the amount of the plaintiff’s damages. The defendant offered no evidence, and the issue was fairly submitted to the jury, with instructions, which were satisfactory to both parties. The verdict was for $5,000. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, on the ground that the award of damages was excessive, not justified by the evidence, and appearing to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice. It appealed from the order denying the motion.

The only question for our decision is whether the award of damages, when tested by the evidence, is so obviously excessive as to justify the conclusion that the trial court abused its discretion in denying unconditionally the motion for a new trial.

The record shows that the plaintiff, who is twenty-seven years old, by the defendant’s negligence, sustained a most painful and serious injury to his right testicle, from which he had not recovered at the time of the trial. The evidence fairly justifies the inference that the reasonable probabilities are that he will never fully recover from the effects of the injury, and that it will seriously impair his health, happiness, and ability to do manual labor, which has been his principal occupation. We are of the opinion that the damages are not so excessive as to justify any intei-ference by this court with the verdict.

Order affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Skye, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the prosecutor stated, in response to a grand juror’s question, that a Sheriffs deputy knew defendant from "other burglaries.” The prosecutor’s response, while improper and inappropriate, did not infect the Grand Jury proceeding to the point that its "integrity [was] impaired” (CPL 210.35 [5]; 210.20 [1] [c]; *People v Darby,*75 NY2d 449, 454-455; *People v Calbud, Inc.,*49 NY2d 389, 395-396).

We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court failed to make sufficient inquiry into defendant’s request for new counsel and thereby deprived him of the effective assistance of counsel. The court asked defendant to give the reasons for his request for new counsel and afforded him a reasonable opportunity to support his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Rodriguez,*126 AD2d 580, 581, *lv denied*69 NY2d 954; *cf., People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822). Defendant’s criticism of his attorney was general in nature and centered on his disagreement regarding matters of strategy. Defendant proffered no serious complaints about his attorney. Under those circumstances, the court’s inquiry was sufficient and it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s request for new counsel *(see, People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12, *cert denied*459 US 1178; *People v Medina,*44 NY2d 199).

Finally, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. —burglary, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
Operating Revenues - Accounting Change
The Company changed its method of accounting to accrue the amount of revenue for
sales unbilled at the end of each month.  The cumulative effect of the change on
prior years, net of income taxes, $6,293, is included in net income for 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      675,553
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     75,178
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         115,826
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,431
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 912,988
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            238,203
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 316,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,514
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           264,900
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       22,860
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   48,707
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 240,546
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  912,988
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      253,711
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,561
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     193,175
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     208,736
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         44,975
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               4,700
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  49,675
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        15,396
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,279
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        825
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   39,747
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,968
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,109
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          21,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
        

</TABLE>
### NO. 03-15-00258-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SITTING IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

STEPHANIE MAIE HEINTZLEMANN

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

The State

Appealed from the District Court of Burnet County, Texas, 33th/ 424th

Judicial District

MOTION FOR

AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S

BRIEF

ALICE PRICE

State Bar No



### . 00768177

apgregg50@hotmail.com

408 South Liveoak St.

Lampasas, TX 76550

512/556-4777 Phone

512/556-4779 Fax

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ACCEPTED

03-15-00258-CR

7517768

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/23/2015 1:56:55 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKNO. 03-15-00258-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SITTING IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

STEPHANIE MAIE HEINTZLEMANN

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

The State

Appealed from the District Court of Blanco County, Texas, 33 rd Judicial

District

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S

BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Now comes, STEPHANIE MAIE HEINTZLEMANN, Appellant, and

files his Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief, and

pursuant to Rule 10.5(b), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, would show

unto the Court the following:

a. The deadline for filing Appellant’s Brief is November 2, 2015.b. The length of time requested for the extension of time is 30

days.

c. Appellant requests an extension of time to be able to properly

prepare Appellant’s arguments for the brief.

d. The number of extensions of time which have been previously

requested regarding Appellant’s Brief is one.

e. I have been involved in numerous cases in the 27 th district court

in Lampasas, Texas and 424 th and 33 rd courts in Burnet county that

have required much court time and time away from my office. I was

also diagnosed with Shingles earlier this week, and the medication

that one receives for this treatment is not helping my energy level.

My son’s back injury continues to improve, but the number of

appointments to doctors and physical therapists continues as well.

This turn of events has taken up an unexpected amount of my time,

that I was devoting to the preparation of this brief.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alice Price

ALICE PRICE

State Bar No. 00768177

408 South Liveoak St.

Lampasas, TX 76550

512/556-4777 Phone 512/556-4779 Fax

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, ALICE PRICE, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief was

delivered to the office of Mr. Gary Bunyard, Assistant District Attorney for

Burnet/Blanco 33/424 th District courts, via facsimile number (325) 247-

5274.

Date: October 23, 2015

/s/ Alice Price

ALICE PRICE

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I, ALICE PRICE, hereby certify that my office has contacted and

conferred with Assistant District Attorney for Burnet County, Gary Bunyard,

on October 23rd, via telephone. The state has no objection to my motion for

an extension of time.

/s/ Alice Price_______



### ALICE PRICE
Exhibit 13.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F of Aries Maritime Transport
Limited (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mons S. Bolin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: April 18, 2007

/s/ Mons S. Bolin
---------------------------
Mons S. Bolin
Chief Executive Officer


SK 23248 0002 764951
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the nine months ended May 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
      I, E. Del Thachuk, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:
      July 10, 2007





E.
      DEL
      THACHUK


E.
      Del
      Thachuk


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director











-1-