alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,546  | 38     | 745    | 710    | 974    | 0      | 1,204  | 547    | 253    | 135   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 860    | 23     | 661    | 33     | 0      | 0      | 280    | 5      | 1,110 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,122  | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5127 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on coarse yttrium 

oxide phosphor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on coarse yttrium oxide phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COARSE YTTRIUM OXIDE PHOSPHOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.63 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 coarse yttrium oxide phosphor) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Yttrium oxide phosphor, acti8 vated by europium of a kind’’ in the article descrip9 tion column and inserting ‘‘Coarse yttrium oxide 

10 phosphor with a median particle size greater than 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5127 IH

1 4.9 microns, containing between 4.5 and 5.9 percent 

2 by weight of europium,’’; and 

3 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

4 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 7B Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 7B Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 15     | 108    | 5      | 19     | 23     | 48     | 41     | 27     | 494   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 683    | 142    | 18     | 2      | 353    | 31     | 3      | 207    | 253   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 80     | 54     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

JOHNNY SATURN, § 

PLAINTIFF, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

AUSTIN BERGSTROM § 

INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, § 

DEFENDANT. § 

I) 1 0 DI 

2020UEC 5 AM10149 

CTCU1 

wEr OTEX AS 

Before the court in the above-styled and numbered cause are pro se Plaintiff Johnny 

Saturn's Third Ammeded (sic) Complaint Civil Action filed September 28, 2020 (Doe. #29) and 

Motion for Default Judgment filed December 4, 2020 (Doe. #32). Having considered the motion, 

the case file, and applicable law, the court will deny the motion and strike the amended complaint. 

On May 18, 2020, the court signed an order dismissing this case with prejudice (Doe. #10) 

and issued a final judgment (Doe. #11). Saturn's motion is, in effect, a motion for reconsideration 

which is considered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See, e.g., Austin v. Kroger Tex., 

L.P., 864 F.3d 326, 336 (5th Cir. 2017) ("Rule 59(e) governs motions to alter or amend a final 

judgment."). 

This is Saturn's third attempt to overturn the results of the case. First, on June 8, 2020, the 

court signed an order (Doe. #17) denying a motion to amend the order and judgment and striking 

an amended complaint. Second, on September 14, 2020, the court signed an order (Doe. #24) 

denying a motion for default judgment and striking an amended complaint. Also in that order, the 

court directed the clerk to mail a copy of the order adopting the report and recommendation of the 

magistrate judge (Doe. #10) and the final judgment (Doe. #11) to Saturn via U.S. certified mail 

return receipt requested. Saturn received both on September 18, 2020 (Doe. #28). 
After considering the evidence and arguments presented by Saturn, the court maintains that 

no new evidence or arguments that have been presented that might create a genuine dispute of 

material fact regarding the order dismissing the case as frivolous under 28 United States Code 

Section 191 5(e)(2). "But under even the most liberal construction, Plaintiff [Saturn] alleges 

implausible and clearly baseless claims against the Defendants. Because Plaintiff [Saturn] has 

made only fanciful, fantastic, and delusional allegations, his Complaint should be dismissed as 

frivolous." See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992)(citing Neitzke v. Williams, 490 

U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989)). 

Accordingly, similar to the June 8, 2020 and September 14, 2020 orders, the court will 

once again deny Saturn's default judgment motion and strike Saturn's amended complaint. 

IT IS ORDERED that Saturn's amended complaint (Doc. #29) is STRICKEN. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Saturn's default judgment motion (Doc. #32) is 

DENIED. 

SIGNED this day of December, 2020. 

UNI D STATES 1ST CT JUDGE 

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX, INC.,

Plaintiff / Counterclaim 

Defendant,

v.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant / Counterclaim 

Plaintiff.

 

 Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA

 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC,

Plaintiff.

v.

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant.

 

 Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00758-ADA

 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FOURTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s July 6, 2022 guidance, Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) and Motion 

Offense LLC (“Motion Offense”) hereby submit this Joint Motion for Entry of Fifth Amended 

Scheduling Order attached as Exhibit A.

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 164 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 2
Dated: September 6, 2022

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 

/s/ Liv Herriot

J. Stephen Ravel 

Texas State Bar No. 16584975 

303 Colorado, Suite 2000 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 495-6429 

Tel: (512) 495-6464 

Email: steve.ravel@kellyhart.com 

Gregory H. Lantier (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington DC 20006 

Tel: (202) 663-6327 

Email: gregory.lantier@wilmerhale.com 

Liv Herriot (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Tel: (650) 858-6138 

Email: liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com 

Attorneys for Dropbox, Inc. 

DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC

/s/ Timothy Devlin 

Timothy Devlin (No. 4241)

Derek Dahlgren (pro hac vice)

Alex Chan (Texas Bar No. 24108051)

Cory Edwards (pro hac vice)

1526 Gilpin Avenue

Wilmington, Delaware 19806

Telephone: (302) 449-9010

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com

ddahlgren@devlinlawfirm.com

achan@devlinlawfirm.com

cedwards@devlinlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Motion Offense, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Civil Rule CV-5(b)(1) on September 6, 

2022.

/s/Timothy Devlin

 Timothy Devlin

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 164 Filed 09/06/22 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|New York Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### THOMAS v. THOMAS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 24, 1952.

Elmer C. Roberts, Campton, for appellant.

Edward E. Bach, Campton, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Ova Thomas instituted this action on April 12, 1950, against his wife, Maude Thomas, for a divorce on the ground of abandonment. He sought custody of their five year old son, alleging that Maude was not a fit and proper person to care for the child. Mrs. Thomas filed a counterclaim, asking that she be granted a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. 'She also sought custody of the child, an allowance for alimony and a fee for her attorney. The chancellor heard evidence on both sides and rendered a judgment on May 9th, wherein he granted Mrs. Thomas an absolute divorce, but awarded the custody of the child to Ova Thomas. No allowance was made for alimony, nor was a fee allowed for Mrs. Thomas’s attorney. Mrs. Thomas is appealing from the parts of the judgment adverse to her.

No bill of exceptions or transcript of evidence has been filed with the record. Under the circumstances we must presume that the evidence supports the judgment. Sapp v. Likens, 301 Ky. 445, 192 S.W.2d 394. The question of the child’s custody can be brought before the court at any time. KRS 403.070. The pleadings- support the judgment, and we must presume that the chancellor took in consideration KRS 403.-060 when he refused to make an-allowance for alimony and a fee for Mrsv Thomas’s attorney.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

LUCI LEYKUM, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH

SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No.: 5:20-CV-00478

________________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT

SAN ANTONIO’S APPEARANCE OF CO-COUNSEL

________________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA:

COMES NOW, Defendant University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 

(“UTHSCSA”) and files this Notice of Appearance of Co-Counsel. In support thereof, Defendant 

would show the Court as follows:

Defendant notifies the Court that Emily Ardolino, Deputy Division Chief, will appear as cocounsel along with Amy S. Hilton in this case. Ms. Ardolino is admitted to practice in the U.S. 

District Court for the Western District of Texas, and is a member in good standing with the State 

Bar of Texas. Ms. Hilton will remain as lead counsel and attorney in charge.

Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Texas Attorney General

 

BRENT WEBSTER

First Assistant Attorney General

GRANT DORFMAN

Deputy First Assistant Attorney General

SHAWN COLES

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation 

Case 5:20-cv-00478-OLG-HJB Document 24 Filed 01/27/21 Page 1 of 2
2

THOMAS A. ALBRIGHT

Chief, General Litigation Division 

/s/ Amy S. Hilton

AMY S. HILTON

Assistant Attorney General

General Litigation Division

State Bar No. 24097834

EMILY ARDOLINO

Deputy Division Chief

General Litigation Division

State Bar No. 24087112

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

Telephone: (512) 936-1327

Facsimile: (512) 320-0667

amy.hilton@oag.texas.gov

emily.ardolino@oag.texas.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE

I certify that on January 27, 2021 the foregoing document was filed via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system, causing electronic service upon all counsel of record

/s/ Amy S. Hilton

AMY S. HILTON

Assistant Attorney General

Case 5:20-cv-00478-OLG-HJB Document 24 Filed 01/27/21 Page 2 of 2
Order entered Ju ly 22 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 01032
- CR
EVER RICARDO MARTINEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 36 6th J udicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 84380
- 2019

O RDER Appellant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child younger than
1 4 years of a ge
. We have reviewed his brief and note that he uses the victim ’ s

n ame as wel l as the names of other minor children

. This Court does not allow a pa rty to file a brief th at discloses the names of
victims or witnesses who were children at the time of the offen ses , or t he na me s of any other children discussed or i dentifi ed at trial

. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9. 10(b) (“Unless a c ourt orders otherwise, an elec tronic or paper filing w ith the court,including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive dat a.”), id.

9 .10 (a)(3) (“ Sensitive Data Defined. Sensiti ve data consists of

. . . a birth date, a
h ome address, and t he name of a ny person who was a minor at the time th e offense was committed.”). Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s brief.
We ORDE R appellant to file, w ith in TEN DAYS of the date of this order,

a n amend ed brief that id entifies the victim and a ny other s who were children at the
time of this or any other off e nse either generically (fo r example, “victim” ) or by
initials on ly, including when quo ting relevan t por tions of the record or giving a

statement of th e ca se
. W e DI RECT the Cler k to send copies of this order to t h e Hon orable Tom
Nowak , Presiding Judge , 366th Judicial District Court ; to Matthew Maddox ; and to the Collin County Di strict Attorne y’s Office , Appel late Division

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
null

2017-10-24

323.072

eng - Argued: 2017-10-24. Docket number: 16-3966
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Juan Enriquez v. Ahmed A. Morsy, M.D.

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-00877-CV

Trial court case number: 18-CV-0884

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Juan Enriquez, has filed a third motion for extension of time to file his 

response to appellee’s motion for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration. The motion is 

granted, and the time to file appellant’s response is extended to February 25, 2021. The Court 

will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss___________________

Acting individually

Date: __February 11, 2021___
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
Quarterly Report), of Southern California Edison Company (the Company), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the
best of his knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 8, 2006



/s/    ALAN J.
FOHRERAlan J. Fohrer Chief Executive Officer Southern California Edison Company/s/    THOMAS M.
NOONANThomas M. Noonan Chief Financial Officer Southern California Edison Company


This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0415

Directorate Identifier: 2007NM256AD

LINEAR MOTION 7901708, RB --- 7/26/05

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008