alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50749

Summary Calendar

SUSAN REBECCA CAMMACK, Sovereign Principal,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

ROBERT RHEA BARTON, Judge of a Statutory Court, in his official and 

individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17-CV-414

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Susan Rebecca Cammack appeals the dismissal of her civil rights 

complaint as frivolous under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Our review is for abuse of discretion. See Rogers v. 

Boatright, 709 F.3d 403, 407 (5th Cir. 2013).

In this court, Cammack asserts that the district court erred in dismissing 

her official-capacity claims against Judge Robert Rhea Barton under the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 26, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50749 Document: 00514699782 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2018
No. 17-50749

2

Eleventh Amendment. However, she offers no legal analysis or citation to legal 

authority in her brief. Her discussion of the issue consists entirely of rambling 

allegations and conclusory statements.

We construe liberally the briefs filed by pro se litigants. Yohey v. Collins, 

985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nonetheless, even pro se parties must 

reasonably comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8), which 

requires that the appellant’s brief contain, among other things, an argument 

setting out the appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them. Id. at 224-

25. Because Cammack has not adequately briefed her challenge to the district 

court’s dismissal of her official-capacity claims as barred by the Eleventh 

Amendment, she has waived the issue. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy 

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Additionally, Cammack does not specifically address the district court’s 

determination that her individual-capacity claims were barred by the doctrine 

of judicial immunity. She contends only that the court dismissed her officialcapacity claims without considering her individual-capacity claims, which is a 

contention that is belied by the record. Cammack has therefore waived any 

challenge to the district court’s dismissal of her individual-capacity claims by 

failing to brief the issue. See id.

Under the section of her brief titled “Argument and Standard of Review,” 

Cammack lists the elements of false imprisonment under Texas law and cites 

cases dealing with claims of false imprisonment. She does not, however, 

address the district court’s conclusion that her claim of false imprisonment was 

barred by absolute judicial immunity. As such, she has waived the issue. See 

id.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-50749 Document: 00514699782 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2018
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

SHAKA AQUIL,

a/k/a $haka

- Zulu Cinque Aquil,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 2024

- 0 676

August 14 , 202 4

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco

, Judge.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN

, and MORRIS

, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
----

----

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

| Dated:  September 30, 2010                                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/ Dongliang (Frank) Su                                                     |   |   |   |
| Dongliang (Frank) SuActing ChiefFinancial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5214 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5214

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Himic Anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIMIC ANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Himic Anhydride     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 826-62-                                                  12/31/2015
                          0) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2917.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (the Corporation) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David Bronicheski, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David Bronicheski
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                 |  | David Bronicheski      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
# FILED
December 23, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION

ABEL RODRIQUEZ, JR., ) ) APPELLANT, )

) No. 03-C-01-9612-CR-0 0463 ) ) Greene County v. ) ) James E. Beckn er, Judge ) ) (Post-Convic

tion Rel ief) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) APPELLEE, )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Abel Rodriquez, Jr., Pro Se John Knox Walkup Northeast Correctional Center Attorney General & Repor ter P.O. Box 500 500 Charlotte Avenue Mountain City, TN 37653-0 500 Nashville, TN 37243-0497

Timothy F. Behan Assistant Attorney Gener al 450 James Robertson Parkwa y Nashville, TN 37243-0493 C. Berkley Bell District Attorney General 109 South Main Street Greeneville, TN 37743

OPINION FILED:_______________________________

_____ AFFIRMED Joe B. Jones, Pre siding Judge2 

## O P I N I O N

The appellant, Abel Rodriquez, Jr. (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judg ment of the trial court summaril y dismissing

his action for post-conv iction relief. The trial court found the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The peti tioner contends the

time should be calculated from the time this court’s opi nion in State v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr. , Wayne County No. 01-C-01-9 508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App ., Nashville, June 20, 1996), was filed -- not from the d ate of his conviction. He argues Hill created new law, and the indictment

in his case, like the indict ment in Hill , was void because it did not allege the requisite mens rea . The trial court properly found the statute of limitations barred this action. Moreover, the indictment in this case w as adequate. It mirrors the indictment

in Hill . The supreme court recentlyheld the indictment in Hill passed constitutional, statutory, and common law mus ter. State v. Hill , _____ S.W.2d _____ (Tenn. 1997) (opinion filed in Nas hville on November 3, 1997). After a thorough review

of the record, the b r iefs submitted by the parties , and the law g overning th e issue presented for revi ew, it is the opinion of this court that the judgment of the trial court s hould be affirmed.

__ ________________________________ __________

_ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDIN G JUDGE CONCUR:

______________________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JU DGE

______________________________________ CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION

Abraham De La Torre 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas 

 Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:20-cv-102 

APPENDIX 

Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-00102-RP Document 1-1 Filed 01/30/20 Page 8 of 8
#### ARELLANO v. STATE.

No. 25023.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1951.

No attorneys, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, with a fine of fifty dollars.

The proceedings appear regular. No statement of facts or bill of exception is brought forward with this record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5048 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5048

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Duncan of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.88 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5031 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5031

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-chlorobenzenesulfonyl isocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-chlorobenzenesulfonyl isocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-CHLOROBENZENESULFONYL ISOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-                  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          chlorobenzenesulf                                                 12/31/2015
                          onyl isocyanate
                          (CAS No. 64900-65-
                          8) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2930.90.29)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18     | 35     | 129   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 69     | 119    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 759    | 773    | 545    | 44     | 2,101  | 481    | 502    | 348    | 309    | 215   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 74     | 78     | 130    | 588    | 162    | 135    | 234    | 163    | 283    | 99    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 206    | 455    | 99     | 67     | 140    | 199    | 228    | 82     | 79     | 93    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 153    | 93     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                             
|California Federal Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                             
|California Federal Offshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 15     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

Action brought on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-65/06)

(2006/C 86/27)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ramón Vidal Puig and Wouter Wils, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 16(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 provides: ‘The sanctions laid down by Member States for infringements of this Regulation shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive’. Article 19 provides that Regulation No 261/2004 was to enter into force on 17 February 2005. According to the information before the Commission, Belgium has not as yet laid down any sanctions for infringements of the Regulation which are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

----

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

s0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

138994 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138994 

 COA: 289406 

Wayne CC: 07-100059 

LATICIA EL-AMIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.