alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5085 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5085

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXYFLUORFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-chloro-1-(3-      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          ethoxy-4-                                                         12/31/2015
                          nitrophenoxy)-4-
                          (trifluoromethyl)
                          benzene
                          (Oxyfluorfen)
                          (CAS No. 42874-03-
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2909.30.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 194 (Thursday, October 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59416-59417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6881-5]


Rouse Steel Drum Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency is proposing 
to enter into a settlement with the Rouse Group and the Rouse

[[Page 59417]]

Work Group for response costs pursuant to section 122(h)(1) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1) concerning the Rouse Steel Drum 
Superfund Site located in Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida. EPA will 
consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty (30) 
days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should 
such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the 
proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. Copies of 
the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, 
U.S. EPA, Region 4 (WMD-CPSB), 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, 
404/562-8887.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor within 30 
calendar days of the date of this publication.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
Franklin E. Hill,
Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 00-25604 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5304 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on liquid-filled glass bulbs designed 

for sprinkler systems and other release devices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. SCHWARTZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on liquid-filled 

glass bulbs designed for sprinkler systems and other 

release devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUID-FILLED GLASS BULBS DESIGNED FOR 

4 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND OTHER RELEASE 

5 DEVICES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.26 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain liquid-filled glass bulbs) is amended by striking the 

9 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

10 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5304 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Preston Adolphus STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 24383.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant waived the right to be tried by jury and in open court pleaded guilty to the charge of burglary, a felony less than capital. The court received his plea of guilty, heard the evidence and assessed the punishment at three years in the penitentiary.

The appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
This is how Haller identified this individual defendant in his pro se complaint. * United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4318

___________ Heincie John Haller, Trustee of * Eyeco Trust, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Charles P. Hurley, U.S. Department * of Justice, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Appellee, * District of South Dakota * John B. Jones, Judge, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant, * * Lyle Swenson, U.S. Marshal; Irvin * N. Hoyt, Bankruptcy Judge; Manuel * Diaz Saldena, Secretary of Treasury ; * * Steven D. Hopkins, Revenue Officer; * Karen Schreier, U.S. Attorney, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 21, 1998 Filed: May 27, 1998

___________The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District 1 of South Dakota. -2- Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Hein cieJohn Haller appeals from the final judgment entered in the United State s DistrictCo urt for the District of South Dakota granting defendants & motion to dismis s

1 Hall er & s complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In hi s complain t, Haller asserted broadly that defendants violated various “GOD Given” an d constitutional rights in connect ion with a prior judicial proceeding, and he did not elaborate on the fact

ual basis for his claims in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & briefs, we agree with the district court & s conclusion that Haller & s complaint failed to state a claim, and, contrary to Haller & s argument on appeal, he was not entitled to a jury trial. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Virginia Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1479

___________

Frederick P. Moldan; Luann L. *

Moldan, *

 *

Appellants, *

 *

v. *

 *

State Bank and Trust Company of New *

Ulm, Minnesota, a state chartered *

financial institution doing business * Appeal from the United States

as a Minnesota corporation; Dan * District Court for the

Glickman, as Secretary of Agriculture * District of Minnesota. 

for the United States Department of *

Agriculture; doing business as Rural * [UNPUBLISHED]

Utilities Service and Farm Services *

Agency; Brown County Rural *

Electric Association, a Minnesota *

chartered and member-owned *

cooperative association; John Does, *

1-10; Jane Roes, 1-10; XYZ *

Corporation, 1-5, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 19, 1999

 Filed: April 2, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Frederick P. Moldan and Luann L. Moldan appeal from the district court’s1 order

granting the summary judgment motion of defendants State Bank and Trust Company

of New Ulm (State Bank) and the United States Secretary of Agriculture as to certain

counts, and dismissing without prejudice the Moldans’ remaining claims. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that

the district court’s judgment is correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

We also deny State Bank's pending motion as moot. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT
13.2




ORIGIN
AGRITECH LIMITED




Certification




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Irving Kau, Chief Financial Officer
of Origin Agritech Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      January 27, 2011
              
              /s/
      Irving KauName:
      Irving KauTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-041;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 37-14 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 1
### AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No

. FAA

- 2015

- 0674 Directorate ID : 2014

- SW

- 019

- AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH) Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+; and Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 Helicopters
Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 175 Model EC135 and 112 Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the affected control lever from shifting, contact ing the helicopter structure, and reducing control of the helicopter.
Costs : Parts per Helicopter $312 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $396 (modification) for Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 helicopters Labor per Helicopter ( 32 work

- hour x $ 8 5 / work

hour for the modification ) (6.5 work

- hour x $85/work

hour for the inspection on Model EC135 helicopters ) (1 work

- hour x $85/work

hour for the inspection on Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 helicopters ) $ 2,720

$ 553 per inspection cycle

$85 per inspection cycle

O ther (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $3,032 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $3,116 (modification) for Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 helicopters $553 (inspection) for Model EC135 helicopters per inspection cycle $85 (inspection) for Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 helicopters Total US Fleet Cost $530,600 (modification) for Model EC135 helicopters $348,992 (modification) for Model MBB

- BK 117 C

- 2 helicopters $96,775 (inspection) for Model EC135 helicopters per inspection cycle $9,520 (inspection) for Model MBB

- B K 117 C

- 2 helicopters2 

### Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Wi ll the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Fuller
#### Ex parte BAKER.

No. 24622.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Bla-ckburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*245DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an extradition case.

No bills of exception appear. The executive warrant and proceedings appear regular.

No reversible error appears.

The order of the trial court remanding appellant to the custody of the arresting officer to be delivered in accordance with extradition warrant is affirmed.

"Opinion approved by the court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 18, 2013

d0115 

# Order

January 18, 2013

144875

BETH HOFFMAN, Personal Representative

of the Estate of EDGAR BROWN, Deceased,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144875

COA: 289011

Calhoun CC: 2003

- 003576

- NH

DR. PETER BARRETT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On January 10, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to

appeal the March 8, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the

application is again considered, and it is DENIED, there being no majority in favor of

granting leave to appeal or taking other action.

Y OUNG

, C.J., and M ARKMAN and Z AHRA , JJ., would reverse the judgment of the

Court of Appeals.

H ATHAWAY , J., not participating.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5296 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isophthalic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isophthalic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ISOPHTHALIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Isophthalic acid, (CAS No. 

121–91–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2917.39.15) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5296 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NCS MULTISTAGE INC., 

 

 Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00280 ADA 

vs. § 

§ 

INNOVEX DOWNHOLE SOLUTIONS, 

INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc. and Defendant 

Innovex Downhole Solutions, Inc., by and through the undersigned counsel, jointly submit this 

Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of all claims and counterclaims in this action, with each 

party to bear their own costs and fees. The parties respectfully request the Court close this action. 

Dated: July 6, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Domingo M. LLagostera 

Domingo M. Llagostera 

(Attorney-in-charge) 

State Bar No. 24070157 

Blank Rome LLP 

717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1400 

Houston, TX 77002 

Tel.: (713) 632-8682 

Fax: (713) 228-6605 

DLLagostera@BlankRome.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff NCS Multistage Inc.

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 21 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 2
 /s/ Tyler T. VanHoutan 

Tyler T. VanHoutan (Lead Attorney) 

TX State Bar No. 24033290 

Eric S. Schlichter 

TX State Bar No. 24007994 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

600 Travis Street, Suite 7500 

Houston, TX 77002 

T: (832) 214-9911 

F: (832) 214-9924 

tvanhoutan@mcguirewoods.com 

eschlichter@mcguirewoods.com 

Matthew W. Cornelia 

TX State Bar No. 24097534 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1400 

Dallas, TX 75201 

T: (214) 932-6400 

F: (214) 932-6499 

mcornelia@mcguirewoods.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Innovex Downhole Solutions, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 6th day of July, 2020, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(b). 

/s/ Domingo M. LLagostera 

Domingo M. Llagostera 

Case 6:20-cv-00280-ADA Document 21 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 2
20-65

Case 3:20-cv-00065 Document 1-1 Filed 03/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-00065 Document 1-1 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 2