alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Soitec Solar Inc. 4250 Executive Square, Suite 770 La Jolla, CA 92037 (USA)

T. + 1 858-638-0995

F. + 1 858-638-0986

clark.crawford@soitec.com

www.soitec.com

The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

March 15, 2012

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Dock et No. DOT-OST-2012-0029.

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Soitec fully supports the application of Alaska Air lines for air service between San Diego and Washing ton Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the la rgest region without direct service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego a nd the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market dem and without nonstop service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capital

.

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities, shou ld qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means travelers between W ashington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way.

There are also countless other San Diego-based and W ashington-based businesses that are engaged in
health science, telecommunications, and national de fense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Soitec has an immediate n eed for additional nonstop air service to our natio n’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a neede d nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington

, DC. Soitec joins with the San Diego County Regiona l Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economi c Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.Soitec Solar Inc.

Page 2

We thank the Department of Transportation for the op portunity to comment on the above referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely,

Clark Crawford

VP Sales and Business Development N.A., Soitec
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, 

v. 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant/CounterPlaintiff. 

 

Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-00251-ADA 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant. 

 

Civil Action No.: 6:21-cv-758-ADA 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL 

Notice is hereby given of the entry of the undersigned as additional counsel for Dropbox, 

Inc. in the above-referenced consolidated cases. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, all 

further notice and copies of pleadings, papers, and other materials relevant to this action should be 

directed to and served upon: 

Kelly Ransom 

Texas State Bar No. 24109427 

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 

303 Colorado, Suite 2000 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 495-6429 

kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 192 Filed 02/23/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

February 23, 2023 

 /s/ Kelly Ransom 

J. Stephen Ravel 

Texas State Bar No. 16584975 

Kelly Ransom 

Texas State Bar No. 24109427 

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 

303 Colorado, Suite 2000 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 495-6429 

Tel: (512) 495-6464 

Steve.ravel@kellyhart.com 

Kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com 

Gregory H. Lantier (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington DC 20006 

Tel: (202) 663-6327 

gregory.lantier@wilmerhale.com 

Liv Herriot (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

& DORR LLP 

2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Tel: (650) 858-6138 

liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com 

Attorneys for Dropbox, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on February 23, 2023. 

 /s/ Kelly Ransom 

 Kelly Ransom 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 192 Filed 02/23/23 Page 2 of 2
----

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2006/C 140/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that the notified measure is compatible with the EEA Agreement

Date of adoption: 

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 57324

Title: Amendments to the existing ‘Regional Development Grant’ scheme.

Objective: Regional aid and aid to SMEs.

The amendments concern shipbuilding.

Legal basis: Act of 19 December 2003 No 130 (Lov om Innovasjon Norge), St.prp. nr 1 (2004-2005) kapittel 2421 post 50 and ‘Regelverk for forvaltningen av tilskudd, lån og garantier knyttet til fondsmidler som bevilges over kap. 2421, post 50 Innovasjon — prosjekter, fond’.

Budget: NOK 85 million (approximately EUR 10,3 million) annually.

Duration: 

----
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-7 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-7 Filed 01/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00571-OLG Document 35-7 Filed 01/15/21 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED
HEREWITH.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092116
<NAME> SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      440,567
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        807
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          50,018
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        29,181
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,573
<COMMON>                                        22,394
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       74,937
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             62,403
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 159,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                      1,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           160,217
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              11,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      160,081
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       94
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           40
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        606
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   376
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       0
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  520,573
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      129,845
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,395
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      95,079
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     106,474
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         23,371
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 409
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  23,780
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,707
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,073
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         66
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   14,007
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         8,599
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          29,280
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

DR. LUCI LEYKUM,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH 

SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00478-OLG

ADVISORY OF OUTCOME OF MEDIATION

On February 14, 2022, this matter was referred to the undersigned to conduct a nonbinding settlement conference/mediation with the parties [#76]. On April 25, 2022, the 

undersigned held a mediation at which the parties and their counsel appeared and participated. 

The undersigned advises that the case DID NOT SETTLE in mediation.

SIGNED this 26th day of April, 2022.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00478-OLG-HJB Document 84 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 1
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>

STANDARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION                                      EXHIBIT  11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(In thousands, except per share information; unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 First quarter ended
                                                                      June 30
                                                           ----------------------------
                                                               2000           1999
                                                           -----------  ---------------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>
BASIC  AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income applicable to common stock....................  $     1,688      $     1,262
                                                           ===========  ===============

Basic average shares outstanding.........................   12,999,013       12,933,331
                                                           ===========  ===============

Earnings per common share
 - net...................................................  $      0.13      $      0.10
                                                           ===========  ===============

</TABLE>


Note: The incremental shares from assumed conversion of 7 1/4% convertible
subordinated debentures and the exercise of outstanding stock options are not
included in computing the diluted per-share amounts because the calculations
include adjustments which are antidilutive.
Exhibit 31

                                  Certification

I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest Mortgage
Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.
<PAGE>

Date: 3/14/06

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.

/s/ John P. Grazer
------------------
John P. Grazer
CFO
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2014______-NM-____124______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopsmith, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. May, Vice
President of Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                  |  |     |  |                                                           
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|November 18, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark May
   Vice President of Finance
   And Treasurer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hotel Outsource Management
      International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      Report), I, Jacob Ronnel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
                /s/Jacob RonnelJacob
                Ronnel, Chief Executive OfficerHotel
                Outsource Management International, Inc.February
                13, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SPECTRUM CONROL, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 28, 1998
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO ITS
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000092769
<NAME> SPECTRUM CONTROL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                       417
<INVENTORY>                                     12,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,813
<PP&E>                                          33,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,406
<BONDS>                                          3,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,091
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,598
<SALES>                                         14,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,641
<CGS>                                           10,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                       515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                956
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       956
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company and Golden State Water Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/FLOYD E. WICKSFloyd E. Wicks Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007                                  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
APPENDIX B

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DEL RIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner,

V. CIVIL NO. DR-20-CV-36-

$1,531,924.54 IN UNITED STATES

CURRENCY SEIZED FROM

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT

405685541 IN THE NAME OF

D L INVESTMENTS, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE

1. On the day of , 2020, a Verified Complaint 

for Forfeiture in rem was filed in this Court by the United States Attorney for the Western District 

of Texas and Assistant United States Attorney Antonio Franco, Jr., against the property described 

below, which is also specifically described in the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture, for violation 

of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343, Wire Fraud, and subject to forfeiture to the United States of America 

pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), namely:

$1,531,924.54 in United States Currency Seized from JPMorgan Chase Bank Account 

405685541 in the Name of D L Investments,

hereinafter the “Respondent Property.”

2. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(4)(b), notice to any person who reasonably 

appears to be a potential claimant shall be by direct notice. Accompanying this notice is the 

Verified Complaint for Forfeiture which has been filed in this cause and which describes the 

Respondent Property. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(4)(b), any person claiming an interest in 

the Respondent Property who has received direct notice of this forfeiture action must file a Claim, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case 2:20-cv-00036-AM Document 1-4 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 2
2

in compliance with Rule G(5)(a), with the court within thirty-five (35) days after the notice was 

sent, if delivered by mail (if mailed, the date sent is provided below), or within 35 days of the 

date of delivery, if notice was personally served. An Answer or motion under Rule 12 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must then be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the Claim 

being filed. 

The Claim and Answer must be filed with the Clerk of the Court, 111 East Broadway, 

Room L100, Del Rio, Texas 78840, and copies of each must be served upon Assistant United 

States Attorney Antonio Franco, Jr., 601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600, San Antonio, Texas 78216, 

or default and forfeiture will be ordered. See Title 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(4)(A) and Rule G(5) of the 

Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

Failure to follow the requirements set forth above will result in a judgment by default taken 

against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

DATE NOTICE MAILED:

 

Case 2:20-cv-00036-AM Document 1-4 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 2