alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 

CASE NUMBER: P03-0633

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1 3 

KEYWORDS: 

AQUATOX-C 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT 

FATE: Solid 

LogKow = 7.97(E); S (mg/L, 25EC) < 0.001(E); H < 1.00E-8(E) 

MP (C) = 82-84(M); BP (C) > 400(E); VP @ 25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E) 

LogKoc = 5.72(E); LogBCF = 1.98(E); 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption & part biodeg 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk 

PBT Potential: P1B1T1 

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

HEALTH: Absorption is nil through the skin based on 

physical/chemical properties and poor through the lungs and GI 

tract based on analogs. No significant health concerns. 

*CEB HEALTH: Low concern (No exposures needed). 

TOXICITY DATA: negative in Salmonella and E coli, study used an 

inadequate protocol with only one plate per dose level 

acute oral study in rats - no deaths or signs of toxicity at 500 

or 2000 mg/kg 

not a skin irritant 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L 

(ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = * P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = * P 

fish 30-d ChV = 0.001 or * P 

daphnid ChV = 0.001 or * P 

algal ChV = 0.002 or * P 

Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; 

MW362; log Kow = 8.3 (ClogP), 8.0 (EPI); solid with mp = 83 C 

and S <0.001 to 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 
concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 

mg/L; 

high concern for toxicity; 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.001 mg/L (ppm) or * 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water; 

Becky Jones 564-8919
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:20-cv-00251-ADA 

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DROPBOX, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 6:21-cv-00758-ADA 

ORDER 

 This Court, after considering Dropbox, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of 

Counsel, is of the opinion that the Unopposed Motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal is GRANTED and J. Stephen 

Ravel is hereby withdrawn as Dropbox, Inc.’s counsel of record. 

SIGNED THIS ____ day of ________ 2023. 

 ___________________________________ 

 ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 234-1 Filed 03/14/23 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-2296

SABRINA D. DAVIS, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, 

 Defendant – Appellee, 

 and 

KIA MOTORS OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District 

Judge. (6:08-cv-01937-RBH) 

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Sabrina D. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. David Christopher Marshall, 

Curtis L. Ott, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Opinion vacated by order dated January 21, 2011
2

PER CURIAM: 

Sabrina D. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Defendant Kia Motors America, Incorporated has 

moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on August 18, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on November 

18, 2009. Because Davis failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

            SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                            Fiscal Year Ended December 31
                  Twelve
                  Months
                  Ended
                  3/31/00   1999      1998     1997      1996     1995
<S>               <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Earnings:
  Net income
  (Note 1)        $38,527   $46,768   $43,542  $45,363   $42,841  $39,624
    Income taxes   23,334    26,427    25,035   27,259    24,035   16,232
    AFUDC
     borrowed      (2,652)  (2,507)   (1,465)    (797)     (445)     (621)
    Fixed charges  19,683    20,371    21,166   20,916    21,910   21,942
Total adjusted
 earnings         $78,892   $91,059   $88,278  $92,741   $88,341  $77,177

Fixed Charges:
  Total interest
   expense         19,078    19,766    20,680   20,460    21,472   21,377
   Interest
   component of
   rents (Note 2)     605       605       486      456       438      565
Total fixed
charges            19,683    20,371    21,166   20,916    21,910   21,942

Ratio of earnings
to fixed
charges (Note 3)      4.0       4.5       4.2     4.4        4.0      3.5
<FN>
Notes:

   (1)  Net income is before preferred dividend requirements.
   (2)  One-third of rentals represents a reasonable
           approximation of the interest factor.
   (3)  The ratios above do not reflect the fixed charge
           component in SIGECO's power contract with OVEC.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 21, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 21, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A1757. CLAUDIS MICHAEL FABIEN v. ARV PROPERTIES, LLC.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On June 06, 2018, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a 

brief no later than June 18, 2018. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of 

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is 

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
NUMBER 13-19-00018-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ISAAC MONTES, Appellant,

v.

OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION,

RANDALL FURBAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS OVERHEAD MANAGEMENT, AND

JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

OVERHEAD MANAGEMENT, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appellant’s Motion to Stay Appeal

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant Isaac Montes filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which this court 

denied without reaching the merits. Appellant’s writ for mandamus is now pending

pending before the Texas Supreme Court. If the mandamus is granted, then the 
2

current appeal will become moot. Accordingly, appellant has filed an opposed “Motion 

to Stay Appeal Pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus Before the Texas Supreme Court” 

to stay the appeal for at least thirty days, after which time appellant has agreed to move 

forward with the current appeal regardless of whether the Supreme Court has ruled on 

the mandamus.

Having reviewed appellant’s motion, we hereby GRANT the motion. We order

all proceedings and deadlines on appeal STAYED for thirty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM 

Delivered and filed the

29th day of January, 2019.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________
NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 372

- C R



### ____________________

IN RE BRETT W. LIGON , MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

_______________________________________________________ ______________ Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Brett W. Ligon , the Montgomery County District Attorney, filed a petition for writ

of man damus. The relator is prosecuting Cause No. 14

- 05

- 05257

- CR

, The State of Texas

v. Michael Burl Massengill

. Relator seeks a writ compelling the Honorable Kelly W.

Case, Judge of the 9th District Court of Montgomery County

, Texas, to vacate his

discovery order signed on August 29, 2014 . We note our jurisdiction over this matter and

the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).

Relator alleges that prejudice will result if discovery occurs before the issues

raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.2 The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is

ORDERED that the trial court’s order of August 29, 2014 in Cause No. 14

- 05

- 05257

- CR

is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this Court. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator as a condition to any relief herein

granted.

TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED September 8, 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of Southern Natural Gas Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg G. Gruber, Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



                                              /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg G. Gruber
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              August 13, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Larry Mosley, CFO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Mosley

Larry MosleyCFO and DirectorDated: March 31, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. MG00-8-001]

Take notice that Egan Hub Partners, L.P. submitted revised standards of conduct on August 31, 2000 in response to the Commission's August 1, 2000 Order on Standards of Conduct, 92 FERC ¶ 61,137 (2000).

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or protest in this proceeding with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 or 215 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to intervene or protest should be filed on or before October 13, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of these filings are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                    (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25408  Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT B
*** E.O. 12866 Review

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***



## EPA and NHTSA Response to June **17 , 2015**  **Interagency Comments on Preamble Section I**  **- HDV Phase**  **2 NPRM** Agencies	Responses : In	response	to	interagency	comments,	the	agencies	will incorporate the	following	edits,	which	we	believe	meets	the	intent	of	the	interagency	suggested	edits while	improving	the	precision	and	clarity	of	the	request	for	comments.

... The agencies request comment on which alternative baseline scenario s would be most appropriate for analys is in the final rule the appropriateness of these reference cases
. Specificall y, the agencies request empirical evidence to support whether the agencies should use for the final rule the central cases used in this proposal, alternative sensitivity cases such as those mentioned below, or some other scenario s . See Section X.A.1of this Preamble and Chapter 11 of the draft RIA for a more detailed discussion of baselines. As part of a sensitivity

analysis, additional baseline scenarios were also evaluated for HD pickups and vans , including baseline pay back periods of 12, 18 and 24 months . See Section VI of this Preamble and Chapter 10 of the draft RIA for a detailed discussion of these additional scenarios.
CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


BIDGIVE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BidGive International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David M. Rees, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:




1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.Date:
      November 22, 2010
            
            /S/David M. ReesDavid
      M. Rees
              Chief
      Financial Officer









This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-40420 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Juan Carlos Arias Lieva, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-139-1 

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos 

Arias Lieva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lieva has not filed a response. We 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

February 17, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-40420 Document: 00516207116 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2022
No. 21-40420 

2 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-40420 Document: 00516207116 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2022
Exhibit 12

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary
Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                         |  |                              |   |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                         |  | Three Months Ended March 31, |  
|Millions of Dollars, Except for Ratios                   |  | 2006                         |   |  | 2005 |  
|Earnings:                                                |  |                              |   |  |      |  
|Net income                                               |  | $303                         |   |  | $129 |  
|Equity earnings net of
distributions                     |  | (14                          | ) |  | (8   | )
|Total earnings                                           |  | 289                          |   |  | 121  |  
|Income taxes                                             |  | 184                          |   |  | 78   |  
|Fixed charges:                                           |  |                              |   |  |      |  
|Interest expense including amortization of debt
discount |  | 125                          |   |  | 122  |  
|Portion of rentals representing an
interest factor       |  | 60                           |   |  | 49   |  
|Total fixed charges                                      |  | 185                          |   |  | 171  |  
|Earnings available for fixed
charges                     |  | $658                         |   |  | $370 |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges                       |  | 3.6                          |   |  | 2.2  |