alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOUTHWESTERN
BELL TELEPHONE  COMPANY'S  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                              
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  64
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                            47
<INVENTORY>                                              0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,639
<PP&E>                                              32,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,567
<BONDS>                                              4,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                           3,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,683
<SALES>                                                  0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,267
<CGS>                                                    0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        97
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                           710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
<FN> 
<F1> THIS AMOUNT IS IMMATERIAL.
<F2> NET SALES OF  TANGIBLE  PRODUCTS  IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL  OPERATING
     REVENUES AND  THEREFORE  HAS NOT BEEN STATED  SEPARATELY  IN THE FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS  PURSUANT  TO  REGULATION  S-X,  RULE  5-03(B).  THIS AMOUNT IS
     INCLUDED IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3> COST OF TANGIBLE  GOODS SOLD IS INCLUDED IN COST OF SERVICES  AND PRODUCTS
     IN  THE  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND  THE  "TOTAL-COST"  TAG,  PURSUANT  TO
     REGULATION S-X,RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CATHY MATHIS-MANUEL,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW M. SAUL,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00322-OLG

ORDER

Before the court in the above-styled cause of action is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis [#1]. This case was automatically referred to the undersigned upon filing, and 

the undersigned has authority to enter this order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff 

seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) based on an inability to afford court fees and 

costs. Having considered Plaintiff’s application and supporting affidavit, the Court is of the 

opinion the motion should be granted. 

All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United

States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350, as well as

an administrative fee.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP includes

income and asset information, which indicates that Plaintiff is unemployed, lives with her

mother, has one dependent, lacks assets or savings, and receives a monthly pension in the

amount of $1,535. This information demonstrates that Plaintiff does not have sufficient monthly

resources available to pay the filing fee, and the Court will grant the motion to proceed IFP. 

1 The administrative fee, which is currently $50, is waived for plaintiffs who are granted 

IFP status. See District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, available at 

http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/fees/district-court-miscellaneous-fee-schedule.
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 

pauperis [#1] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint [#1-1] shall be filed by the 

Clerk without prepayment of fees, costs or the giving of security, and the Clerk shall, until 

further Order of this Court, waive the collection of any other fees or costs from Plaintiff. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve each Defendant required to be 

served with a copy of the summons, complaint, and a copy of this Order by certified mail, return 

receipt requested, if possible. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) (permitting service pursuant to state 

law); Tex. R. Civ. P. 106(a)(2) (permitting service by certified or registered mail by a person 

authorized to serve by Rule 103); Tex. R. Civ. P. 103 (permitting service by certified or 

registered mail by sheriff, constable, clerk, or any person authorized by law).

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731-TA-540 and 541 (Review)]


Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipes From Korea and Taiwan

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
Sec. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders 
on certain welded stainless steel pipes from Korea and Taiwan would be 
likely to lead to continuation of recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Thelma J. Askey dissenting with respect to 
Korea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on July 1, 1999 (64 FR 
35694) and determined on October 1, 1999, that it would conduct full 
reviews (64 FR 55961, October 15, 1999). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in Federal Register on 
March 31, 2000 (64 FR 17308). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, 
on August 1, 2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were 
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these 
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on September 22, 2000. The 
views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3351 
(September 2000), entitled Certain Stainless Steel Pipe from Korea and 
Taiwan: Investigations Nos. 731-TA-540 and 541 (Review).

    Issued: September 25, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25232 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

Octob er 30, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00608

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.S. AND A.S.A, CHILDREN,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01788 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is a parental rights termination case. Af ter Appellant filed a notice of appeal, the
district clerk and court reporter filed their records, and we set the due date for Appellant ’ s brief. Thereafter, the trial court signed a final order, but the clerk’s record does not contain the final order. The appellate record is not complete.

On October 22, 2018, Appellant asked the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s
record and the court reporter to fi le a supplemental reporter’s record. Appellant also filed a motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief.

A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on October 23, 2018.

We WITHDRAW the October 15, 2018 due date for Appellant’s brief. Appellant’s brief will be due twenty days after the appellate record is complete

— after the supplemental reporter’s
record is filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

The supplemental reporter’s record is due within TEN DAYS of the date of this order.

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is MOOT.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 12 of 13
s/Ann M. Donnelly

Case 1:20-cv-00326-RP Document 26 Filed 03/17/20 Page 13 of 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0716

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

TRAVIS DEWAYNE LOHMAN,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jason Marks, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2024

04/10/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0716
Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 1 of 6

Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 2 of 6

Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 3 of 6

Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 4 of 6

Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 5 of 6

Case 1:20-mc-00269-RP   Document 1   Filed 03/13/20   Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Legends Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Billy P. Atkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Billy P. Atkins
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Billy P. Atkins
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Legends Financial Holdings, Inc.
                                           March 19, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4639 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4639

       To extend the suspension of duty on Bayderm Bottom DLV-N.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Altmire introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the suspension of duty on Bayderm Bottom DLV-N.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAYDERM BOTTOM DLV-N.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bayderm Bottom DLV-N) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4992 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear for 

women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Ms. BONAMICI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered 

footwear for women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4992 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Footwear for women, with 

uppers of leather other 

than of pigskin (other than 

work footwear, tennis 

shoes, basketball shoes, 

gym shoes, training shoes 

and the like, and other 

than slip-on footwear), covering the ankle, valued 

$27/pair or higher, designed to be worn in lieu 

of, but not over, other footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease 

or chemicals or cold or inclement weather where 

such protection includes 

protection against water 

that is imparted by the use 

of a coated or laminated 

textile fabric (provided for 

in subheading 6403.91.90) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### NUNEZ v. STATE.

No. 25549.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty. of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is ifor possession of a narcotic drug, with the punishment being assessed by the jury at 5 years in the penitentiary.

*216The record is before this court without either a statement of facts or bill of exception. All proceeding’s appear regular.

No question being presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-569-000]

Take notice that on September 25, 2000, Portland Natural Gas Transmission System (PNGTS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to become effective March 27, 2000;

First Revised Sheet No. 343

First Revised Sheet No. 345

First Revised Sheet No. 347

First Revised Sheet No. 348

First Revised Sheet No. 351

First Revised Sheet No. 352

First Revised Sheet No. 354

First Revised Sheet No. 355

PNGTS states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the requirements of Order No. 637 regarding the waiver of the rate ceiling for short-term capacity release transactions.

PNGTS states that copies of the filing were mailed to all affected customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25419  Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00488

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.F., A CHILD

,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PA

- 02356

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant father’s brief was due in this accelerated appeal on November 24, 2014.

Because no brief was filed, on December 1, 2014, this court rendered an order requiring

appellant father to file his brief on or before December 11, 2014. On December 2, 2014, after

our order issued, appellant father filed a motion to extend time to file his brief. We DENY the

motion as moot. Per our December 1, 2014 order, appellant father’s brief is due on or before

December 11, 2014.

___________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Co urt
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTHTRUST CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         968,438
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             388
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               215,525
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               421,064
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,322,528
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,801,018
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,747,654
<LOANS>                                     29,178,407
<ALLOWANCE>                                    405,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,066,506
<DEPOSITS>                                  26,296,668
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,580,909
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            409,389
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,075,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       421,238
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,408,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              40,066,506
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,127,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              238,360
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,366,055
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             446,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             712,756
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          653,299
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   62,138
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 238
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                491,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                317,686
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     214,210
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   214,210
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.81
<LOANS-NON>                                    113,454
<LOANS-PAST>                                    76,634
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 56,255
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               377,525
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   43,215
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,382
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              405,513
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           405,513
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>