alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 06

- 14

- 00208

- CR

TONY DEWAYNE CRAYTON § IN THE §

v § 6th COURT §

STATE OF TEXAS § OF APPEALS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF LATE

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes The State of Texas, Appellee in the above styled a nd numbered cause, and prays

this Court to grant leave to file Appellee’s brief late, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 8 th Judicial District Court of Hopkins Co unty, Texas.

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. TONY DEWAYNE

CRAYTON and numbered as 1323670.

3. The Appellant was convicted and sentenced by the judge to 50 years in the

penitentiary after a trial before the court.

4. The Appellee’ s brief was due by midnight on October 12, 2015. Appellee requests

leave to file Appellee’s brief late on October 13, 2015.

6. Appellee’s brief is being filed contemporaneous with the motion.

7. Appellee request s leave due to the following:

i. App ellee’s attorney was involved in preparing and try ing State of Texas v.

Franklin Coy Kuhl, Jr., Cause Number 1423952 the week before the brief was due.

This was a serious case wherein the defendant received a life sentence on

Wednesday, October 13, 2015. ACCEPTED
06-14-00208-CR
SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS
10/13/2015 12:22:14 PM
DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKii. Although Appellee ’ s attorney had previously been working on the brief, in

attempting to finish the brief on Monday, October 12, 2015 (Columbus Day), the

issues and research became more in

- depth and he failed to completely finish prior to

the midnight deadline.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , Appellee prays that this Court grant leave

to f ile Appellee’s Brief a few hours late , and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

By: //s// Will Ramsay Will Ramsay

8 th Judicial District Attorney

State Bar No. 24039129

P.O. Box 882

110 Main Street Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 Ph: (903) 885

- 0640 Fax: (903) 885

- 0641 wramsay@hopkinscountytx.org Attorney for Appellee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF LATE was delivered via email to Martin Braddy , Attorney for Ap pellant, on October 13, 2015

.

//s//Will Ramsay

WILL RAMSAY

— Attorney for the Appellee
#### ALLEN v. STATE.

No. 23643.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 30, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for an aggravated assault with a motor vehicle. The punishment assessed is a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of two years.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement ©f facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Robert M. Knight, Jr.,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UnionPacific Railroad Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
# Official Journal C 117/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 117 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4918 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 117

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4918 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 117/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 117/2 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 117/3 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain camera systems originating in Japan and of the initiation of an interim review of the anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan | 8 |
| 2006/C 117/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez) (1) | 13 |
| | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2006/C 117/5 | Action brought on 13 March 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway (Case E-1/06) | 14 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 117/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 117/2

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

2

2006/C 117/3

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain camera systems originating in Japan and of the initiation of an interim review of the anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

8

2006/C 117/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez) (1)

13

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Court

2006/C 117/5

Action brought on 13 March 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Kingdom of Norway (Case E-1/06)

14

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5272 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5272

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or 
 preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in containers holding 3.4 kg or 
                                 less.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or 
 preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in containers holding 3.4 kg or 
                                 less.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPERS, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID, IN 
              CONTAINERS HOLDING 3.4 KG OR LESS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to capers, prepared or 
preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in containers holding 3.4 kg or 
less) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0560

_____________________________

MELISSA KENNEDY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

October 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

MAKAR, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Melissa Kennedy, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Exhibit 12(b)

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Union Pacific Railroad Company and Consolidated Subsidiary
Companies

(Unaudited)



|                                                         |  |                           |   |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                         |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |  
|Millions of Dollars, Except for
Ratios                   |  | 2006                      |   |  | 2005 |  
|Earnings:                                                |  |                           |   |  |      |  
|Net income                                               |  | $682                      |   |  | $366 |  
|Equity earnings net of
distributions                     |  | (29                       | ) |  | (17  | )
|Total earnings                                           |  | 653                       |   |  | 349  |  
|Income taxes                                             |  | 418                       |   |  | 215  |  
|Fixed charges:                                           |  |                           |   |  |      |  
|Interest expense including amortization of debt
discount |  | 250                       |   |  | 244  |  
|Portion of rentals representing an
interest factor       |  | 117                       |   |  | 100  |  
|Total fixed charges                                      |  | 367                       |   |  | 344  |  
|Earnings available for fixed
charges                     |  | $1,438                    |   |  | $908 |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges                       |  | 3.9                       |   |  | 2.6  |
#### CONWELL v. STATE.

No. 26455.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER,' Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of negligent homicide in the first degree; punishment assessed at a fine of $750.

The indictment is sufficient and all matters of procedure appear to be regular. No statement of facts accompanies the record.

The court’s refusal of appellant’s requested special charges cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4917 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ceiling fans for permanent 

installation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. ELLMERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ceiling fans 

for permanent installation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CEILING FANS FOR PERMANENT INSTALLA4 TION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.14 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 ceiling fans for permanent installation) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4917 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1995
CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q/A, AMENDMENT NO. 2
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      317,804
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        921
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,224
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        28,134
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 382,083
<COMMON>                                        19,613
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       54,752
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             43,336
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 117,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              560
<PREFERRED>                                      1,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            91,870
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              25,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    2,198
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           40
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        881
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   286
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 141,947
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  382,083
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       24,976
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               790
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,790
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      21,580
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          3,396
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   6
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,402
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,284
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,118
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         24
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,094
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,354
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           2,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
1 Attachment

Brenda,

Please find attached tank data that I hope sh ould help with the calcs you plan to run.

This along with other data we previously submitted should take care of the info you need to do the tank runs.

This contains specific products stored in the tanks at the time of the study and the parameters we use for calculating

tank emissions.

I have also included tank fitting info for those tanks along with data generat ed during the DAIL Study.

Please let me know what additional info you may need to complete your review.



## Paula LaRocca

Environmental Team Leader, Air

BP Products North America Inc.

HSSE - Environmental

Office: 409-941-8057

Cell: 409-539-9148

Fax: 409-965-0031

paula.larocca@bp.com DAIL Study - BP Tank Info

LaRocca, Paula M

to:

Brenda Shine

08/25/2009 09:05 AM

Cc:

"Duke, Jerry"

Hide Details

From: "LaRocca, Paula M" <Paula.LaRocca@bp.com>

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Duke, Jerry" <Jerry.Duke@bp.com>

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

EPA Follow up 8-09.xls 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

1/28/2013 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\bshine\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notes87944B\~web8223.htm
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

288) ll-K- (J) -1 

) -

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58 AM Sheet 288 of 325 
P.2 

n-K-(j)-i 

CALCULATION FOR THE COST OF USING ALTERNATIVE FUELS 

UNDER THE POWERPLANT AND INDUSTRIAL FUEL USE ACT OF 

1978. 

Federal Register 43/89 - 42212. 

June 23, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(J)-1
No. 72-6369.

#### Cosco *v.*Meacham et al.

Sup. Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 74     | -150  
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 11     |        |        |        |        |        | 63     | -69    | 5      | -24   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | -40    | 139    | -24    | 95     | -80    | 6      | -114   | 19     | -88    | 111   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -72    | 36     | 29     | -52    | 19     | 78     | -74    | 33     | -6     | 11    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 923    | -563   | -72    | 34     | 342    | -277   | 84     | -49    | -85   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 132    | -4     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 1 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 2 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 3 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 4 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 5 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 6 of 7

Case 5:20-cv-00332-FB-HJB   Document 1-2   Filed 03/17/20   Page 7 of 7