alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12

STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Ratios)



|                                                                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                            |  | For the Year EndedMarch 31, |       
|                                                                            |  | 2014                        |        |   | 2013 |   |        | 2013 | 
|Net investment income                                                       |  | $                           | 19,307 |   |      | $ | 16,488 |      |  | $ | 13,743 |  
|Add: fixed charges and preferred distributions                              |  |                             | 5,949  |   |      |   | 4,768  |      |  |   | 1,425  |  
|Less: preferred distributions                                               |  |                             | (2,850 | ) |      |   | (2,850 | )    |  |   | (198   | )
|                                                                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net earnings                                                                |  | $                           | 22,406 |   |      | $ | 18,406 |      |  | $ | 14,970 |  
|Fixed charges and preferred distributions:                                  |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Interest expense                                                            |  |                             | 2,075  |   |      |   | 1,127  |      |  |   | 768    |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                                     |  |                             | 1,024  |   |      |   | 791    |      |  |   | 459    |  
|Preferred distributions                                                     |  |                             | 2,850  |   |      |   | 2,850  |      |  |   | 198    |  
|                                                                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Total fixed charges and preferred distributions                             |  | $                           | 5,949  |   |      | $ | 4,768  |      |  | $ | 1,425  |  
|Ratio of net earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions |  |                             | 3.8    |   |      |   | 3.9    |      |  |   | 10.5   |  

The calculation of the ratio of net earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions is above. Net
earnings consist of net investment income before fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees.
#### Tel-Tru Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent, v John Brandt, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Supreme Court, Galloway, J. In doing so, we acknowledge that this court was partially incorrect in its decision in *Tel-Tru Mfg. Co. v North Riv. Ins. Co.*(90 AD2d 670). There, we erroneously held that the product withdrawal exclusion contained in North River’s policy number 523 007383 5 excluded coverage for the underlying claim *(see, Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*34 NY2d 356). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Corinthian McLeod, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered February 1, 1989, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v*
      *488
      *Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant
to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy
Management, L.L.C. (Enbridge Management), hereby certifies that Enbridge Managements Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, (the Annual Report), filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Enbridge Management.

Date: February 18, 2010



|    |  |                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/    MARK A.
MAKI                                 
|    |  | Mark A. Maki                                        
|    |  | Vice PresidentFinance (Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION

I, Larry Mosley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report of Data Call Technologies,Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: January 4, 2012

/s/ Larry MosleyCFO and Director
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2      | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 123    | 114   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 86     | 82     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7115 

CLAUDE WHITT, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:06-cv-00197-jlk)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 30, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Whitt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Claude Whitt, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whitt has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 28, 2021, Defendant Jorge Alonso Gutierrez pled guilty to Counts One and Five

of the Indictment in the above-captioned case. District Court Judge David Briones sentenced 

Defendant on September 2, 2021. The United States hereby dismisses counts 2-4 and 6-24 of the 

Indictment.

Dated: September 2, 2021

Respectfully submitted, 

 

TODD KIM

U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL

RESOURCES DIVISION

By: /s/ Mary Dee Carraway

Mary Dee Carraway 

Trial Attorney

Environmental Crimes Section

U.S. Department of Justice

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JORGE ALONSO GUTIERREZ,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL NO. 3-20-cr-00920-DB

Case 3:20-cr-00920-DB Document 40 Filed 09/02/21 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 2nd day of September, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Robert Perez, Esq. 

Counsel for Defendant 

/s/ Mary Dee Carraway 

Mary Dee Carraway 

Trial Attorney 

US Dept. of Justice 

Washington, DC

Case 3:20-cr-00920-DB Document 40 Filed 09/02/21 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

On this day, the Court considered the Government’s Motion for Downward Departure 

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, and the Court having considered the same, is of the opinion that 

said Motion should be GRANTED.

SIGNED AND ENTERED this ______ day of _________________ 2019.

____________________________________

HON. KATHLEEN CARDONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ROSA MARIA MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

S SEALED

NO. EP-18-CR-3013-KC

Case 3:20-cr-00920-DB Document 40 Filed 09/02/21 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability

# AGENCY:

National Council on Disability (NCD).

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the renewal of NCD's advisory committees—International Watch and Technology Watch.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark S. Quigley, Public Affairs Specialist, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004-1107; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax), mquigley@ncd.gov (e-mail).

# AGENCY MISSION:

The National Council on Disability is an independent federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its overall purpose is to promote policies, programs, practices, and procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with disabilities, regardless of the nature of severity of the disability; and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society.

## International Watch

The purpose of NCD's International Watch is to share information on international disability issues and to advise NCD's Foreign Policy Team on developing policy proposals that will advocate for a foreign policy that is consistent with the values and goals of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

## Technology Watch

NCD's Technology Watch (Tech Watch) is a community-based, cross-disability consumer task force on technology. Tech Watch provides information to NCD on issues relating to emerging legislation on technology and helps monitor compliance with civil rights legislation, such as Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.

These committees are necessary to provide advice and recommendations to NCD on international disability issues and technology accessibility for people with disabilities.

We currently have balanced membership representing a variety of disabling conditions from across the United States.

Signed in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2000.

Ethel D. Briggs,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 00-25104  Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED
EARNINGS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,037
<SECURITIES>                                       798
<RECEIVABLES>                                  240,694<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                    334,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               624,365
<PP&E>                                         118,956<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 784,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          385,455
<BONDS>                                         88,559
<COMMON>                                         3,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   784,336
<SALES>                                        300,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,315
<CGS>                                          280,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,376
<INCOME-TAX>                                       358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
<FN>
<F1>SHOWN NET IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<F2>NOT SHOWN SEPARATELY UNDER MATERIALITY GUIDELINES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5239 

To reduce temporarily the duty on P-Dichlorobenzene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on P-Dichlorobenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-DICHLOROBENZENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 P-Dichlorobenzene (CAS 

No. 106–46–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2903.91.30) ....................... 0.6% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5239 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS