alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2161; MM Docket No. 00-174, RM-9965]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Kailua-Kona, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Nick 
Koster proposing the allotment of Channel 244A at Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 
as the community's second local aural transmission service. Channel 
244A can be allotted to Kailua-Kona in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements with no site restriction. The 
coordinates for Channel 244A at Kailua-Kona are 19-38-26 North Latitude 
and 155-59-44 West Longitude.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 13, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before November 28, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as follows: Nick 
Koster, P.O. Box 340091, Austin, TX 78734.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur D. Scrutchins, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-174; adopted September 
13, 2000 and released September 22, 2000. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-
A257), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-25393 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### E. C. HENDERSON v. STATE.

No. 27243.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 13, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of forgery ; the penalty is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

Since perfecting his appeal the appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)   
|View History: Annual                             
|View History: Annual                             
|View History:                                    
|                                                 
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 2      | 3      | 4      | 5      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5055 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5055

     To extend the suspension of duty on 3-Amino-4-methylbenzamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the suspension of duty on 3-Amino-4-methylbenzamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-4-METHYLBENZAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-Amino-4-methylbenzamide) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132384 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, Marilyn Kelly 

LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE Maura D. Corrigan 

A15607200, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, ROYAL INDEMNITY Justices UNDERWRITING, INC., AMERICAN

ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
 COMPANY, PRINCETON EAGLE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, GENERAL SECURITY 

INDEMNITY, and ROUGE STEEL COMPANY, 

Plaintiffs,

Counter Defendants & Appellants, 

v SC: 132384 

 COA: 269441 
 UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Wayne CC: 04-404812-NZ 

Defendant, Counter Plaintiff,

Cross-Plaintiff & Appellee,

and 

McGILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., 

EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION 

CORPORATION, ALLEGHENY PLASTICS,

INC., COMMERCIAL CONTRACTING CORP., 

INC., and BEARING SERVICE, INC.,

 Defendants, Cross-Defendants, 

and 

HEADCO INDUSTRIES, INC., BEARING 

HEADQUARTERS COMPANY, and MOTION 

INDUSTRIES, INC.,

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Theodore M. HOGROBROOKS, Appellant, v. Z. Jack WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 16018.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

May 22, 1959.

Morris Bogdanow, Houston, for appellant.

M. W. Plummer, Sr., Houston, for ap-pellee.

BOYD, Justice.

Z. Jack Williams sued Inez Hogrobrooks and Ruby Taylor in trespass to try title to a tract of land, and for damages. Inez Hogrobrooks and Ruby Taylor had claimed the land under a will purportedly made by a former owner, Barbara E. Smith. Williams claimed the land through a deed from Barbara E. Smith. Ruby Taylor appears to have deeded any interest she may have had to Inez Hogrobrooks, and filed a disclaimer. Inez died, leaving Theodore M. Hogrobrooks as her only heir at law. He was subsequently made a party defendant. Trial was to the court and judgment was rendered for Williams. Theodore M. Hogrobrooks appeals.

No motion for a new trial was filed, and there is no statement of facts in the record.

Hogrobrooks filed a motion for continuance which was overruled, and that ruling is challenged as the only ground for reversal.

Rule 324, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, provides, among other things, that a motion for new trial shall not be a prerequisite to appeal in a non-jury case, “But motion for new trial shall be a necessary prerequisite to consideration of the complaints mentioned in Rule 325.” Rule 325 provides that “In cases of motions for continuance, * * * the rulings of the court thereon shall be considered as acquiesced in, unless complained of in the motion for new trial; * * * Nothing *917in Rule 324 shall render a motion for new trial unnecessary in the instances mentioned in this Rule * * *.”

We think that compliance with Rule 325 is mandatory and .that appellant, in failing to file a motion for new trial complaining of the overruling of his motion for continuance, acquiesced in the ruling of the trial court. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. Shell Oil Co., Inc., Tex.Civ. App., 175 S.W.2d 653; Insurance Inv. Corporation v. Hargrove, Tex.Civ.App., 179 S.W.2d 383.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7941]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bodies and Shadows: Caravaggio and His Legacy''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Bodies and Shadows: Caravaggio and His 
Legacy'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about 
November 11, 2012, until on or about February 10, 2013; the Wadsworth 
Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford, CT, from on or about March 8, 2013, 
until on or about June 16, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: June 22, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-16139 Filed 6-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57943-57944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24698]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Part 245

[INS No. 2048-00]
RIN 1115-AF75


National Interest Waivers for Second Preference Employment-Based 
Immigrant Physicians Serving in Medically Underserved Areas or at 
Department of Veterans Affairs Facilities; Correction

AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice.

ACTION: Correction to interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57944]]

SUMMARY: This rule contains a correction to an Immigration and 
Naturalization Service (Service) interim rule, published in the Federal 
Register on Wednesday, September 6, 2000, at 65 FR 53889. The interim 
rule established the procedure under which a physician may obtain a 
waiver of the job offer requirement that applies to alien beneficiaries 
of second preference employment-based immigrant visa petitions if the 
physician is willing to practice full-time in an area designated by the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of health 
care professionals, or in a facility operated by the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

DATES: The interim rule is effective October 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Howie, Headquarters 
Adjudications Officer, Adjudications Division, Immigration and 
Naturalization Service, 425 I Street, NW, Room 3040, Washington, DC 
20536, telephone (202) 353-8177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service published an interim rule in the 
Federal Register on September 6, 2000, at 65 FR 53889. In the interim 
rule there is a reference to ``Sec. 204(n) of this chapter'' the 
reference should have been to ``Sec. 204.12(a) of this chapter.''

Corrections

    In rule document 00-22832 beginning on page 53889 in the issue of 
Wednesday, September 6, 2000, make the following correction:


Sec. 245.18  [Corrected]

    On page 53896, in the second column, under paragraph (i), on the 
8th line, the reference to ``Sec. 204(n)'' should be revised to read: 
``Sec. 204.12(a)''.

    Dated: September 21, 2000.
Doris Meissner,
Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
[FR Doc. 00-24698 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 24557.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1949.

Reid & Reid, Abilene, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area, with a fine of $1,000.

The State’s Attorney has filed his brief, from which we quote: “The statement of facts fails to show that the area in which whisky was alleged to have been sold was a dry area. ■ There is no proof in the statement of facts, nor in any bill of exception, nor in any qualification on any bill of ex*191ception that the result of the election, which resulted in the area being voted dry, was ever published as required by law.

“In view of this state of the record, ap-pellee thinks the conviction can not be sustained, See Gober v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 395, 181 S.W.2d 279; Watson v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 632, 122 S.W.2d 311; Ray v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 553, 137 S.W.2d 1031; O’Rear v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 607, 183 S.W.2d 570.”

The recommendation is based on the record. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
STANDARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
              COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE           EXHIBIT 11
              (In thousands, except share information; unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     Second quarter ended            Six months ended
                                                                               September 30              September 30
                                                               ----------------------------      --------------------
                                                                      1998          1997         1998           1997
                                                                      ----          ----         ----           ----
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

<S>                                                                <C>           <C>          <C>            <C>
Net income applicable to common stock.........................     $ 4,018       $ 5,281      $ 6,033        $ 7,132

Basic average shares outstanding..............................  12,815,865    12,797,716   12,812,853     11,950,459

Basic earnings per common share - net.........................       $0.31         $0.41        $0.47          $0.60

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

 Net income applicable to common stock........................     $ 4,018       $ 5,281      $ 6,033        $ 7,132
Add    - after-tax interest expense on 7 1/4% convertible
         Subordinated debentures at November 1................         825           825        1,650          1,650
                                                                   -------       -------      -------          -----

Net income applicable to common stock.........................     $ 4,843       $ 6,106      $ 7,683        $ 8,782
                                                                   -------       -------      -------          -----

Basic average shares outstanding..............................  12,815,865    12,797,716   12,812,853     11,950,459
Increase in shares outstanding assuming
       - conversion of 7 1/4% convertible
         subordinated debentures at November 1................   2,348,536     2,348,536    2,348,536      2,348,536

Diluted average shares outstanding............................  15,164,401    15,146,252   15,161,389     14,298,995

Diluted earnings per common share - net.......................       $0.32*        $0.40        $0.51*         $0.61*
</TABLE>


* Calculation of diluted earnings per share includes adjustments which are
antidilutive. Therefore, basic and diluted are shown as the same on the face of
the income statement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP95-168-004]

Take notice that on August 25, 2000, Sea Robin Pipeline Company (Sea Robin) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, pro forma tariff sheets to comply with Ordering Paragraph (C) of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's June 30, 1999, order in the referenced docket. The pro forma tariff sheets modify Sea Robin's General Terms and Conditions and Rate Schedule's FTS, FTS-2, and ITS to separately state gathering and transmission costs, since it was determined that facilities upstream of the compressor station on the Vermillion 149 platform performed a gathering function.

Sea Robin states that a copy of this filing is available for public inspection during regular business hours at Sea Robin's office at 5444 Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056-5306. In addition, copies of this filing are being served on parties to the proceeding and appropriate state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before October 6, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Applicant's designated contact person is Anna Cochrane at 202-293-5794.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25123  Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M