alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000092195
<NAME> SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS & ELECTRIC CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      710,634
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,759
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          93,731
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        49,224
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 859,348
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            234,621
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 312,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,514
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           216,825
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              43,814
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   53,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 212,616
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  859,348
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      182,966
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,168
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     141,861
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     154,029
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         28,937
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,646
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  30,583
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,687
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,896
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        548
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   20,348
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        14,297
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,126
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          46,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS

May 2012

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5153 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5153

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Acetyl-4-(3-dodecyl-2, 
         5-dioxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Acetyl-4-(3-dodecyl-2, 
         5-dioxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-ACETYL-4-(3-DODECYL-2, 5-DIOXO-1-PYRROLIDINYL)-2,2,6,6-
              TETRAMETHYLPIPERIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-Acetyl-4-(3-dodecyl-2, 5-
dioxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5013 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tebuthiuron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tebuthiuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEBUTHIURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Urea, N-[5-(1,1- 

dimethylethyl)-1,3,4- 

thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N’-dimethyl (Tebuthiuron) 

(CAS No. 34014–18–1) 

(provided for in subheading 2934.99.90) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5013 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(d)

                       MAXIMUM ANNIVERSARY VALUE OPTIONAL
                            DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT

This Endorsement is made a part of, and subject to, the other terms and
conditions of the Contract to which it is attached.

This Endorsement modifies the AMOUNT OF DEATH BENEFIT under the DEATH OF OWNER
BEFORE THE ANNUITY DATE and is effective on the Contract Date.

The following are added under the DEFINITIONS section of the Contract:

        CONTINUATION DATE

        The Date on which We receive, in Our Service Center: (a) the Spousal
        Beneficiary's written request to continue the Contract in force, and (b)
        Due Proof of Death of the Owner. If We receive (a) and (b) on different
        dates, the Continuation Date will be the later date.

        CONTINUATION YEAR

        A year starting from the Continuation Date in one calendar year and
        ending on the day preceding the anniversary of such date in the
        succeeding calendar year.

        NET PURCHASE PAYMENT

        The sum of all Purchase Payments, reduced proportionately on the date of
        each partial withdrawal by the percentage at which the Contract Value is
        reduced by such withdrawal (including any fees or charges applicable to
        the withdrawal).

        SPOUSAL BENEFICIARY

        The Owner's spouse who: (a) is designated as the primary Beneficiary;
        (b) is age 80 or younger at the time of the Owner's death; and (c)
        elects to continue the Contract as the Owner.

AMOUNT OF DEATH BENEFIT

If You are age 80 or younger on the Contract Date, and You die prior to the
Annuity Date, the amount of the Death Benefit will be determined based upon the
Death Benefit option You selected on the Application Form. Once a Death Benefit
option is selected it cannot be changed or terminated. However, Your Spousal
Beneficiary can terminate this benefit on the Continuation Date.

MAXIMUM ANNIVERSARY OPTIONAL DEATH BENEFIT CHARGE

On an annual basis, this charge equals [0.00%-1.00%] of Your average daily
ending value of the assets attributable to the Accumulation Units of the
Subaccount(s) to which the Contract is allocated. We deduct this charge daily.
This charge is in addition to the charges in Your Contract.

MAXIMUM ANNIVERSARY VALUE OPTIONAL DEATH BENEFIT

If upon Our receipt of Due Proof of Death of the Owner prior to the Annuity Date
and prior to the Owner attaining age 90, the Beneficiary will receive the
greatest of:

(a)     Purchase Payments reduced for any partial withdrawals (and any fees or
        charges applicable to such withdrawals) in the same proportion that the
        Contract Value was reduced on the date of such withdrawal; or

(b)     Contract Value; or


                                       1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         1,502,823
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,571,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                   655,656
<INVENTORY>                                    14,180,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               39,375,189
<PP&E>                                         3,559,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,257,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,939,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,460,702
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          327,487
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,047,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,939,634
<SALES>                                        21,469,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,469,630
<CGS>                                          17,901,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,648,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                660,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                   251,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            409,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   409,079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.12
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 520 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 520

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

 Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Wu, Mr. Jones, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. 
 Stark, Mr. Holt, and Mr. Polis) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT 
              REGARDING GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SALMON.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is further amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless the food 
bears a label stating that the food contains genetically engineered 
fish.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Officer Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CROWN FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. (the Company) for the year ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey M. Hoobler, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                              
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|       |  | /S/ JEFFREY M. HOOBLER                       
|Name:  |  | Jeffrey M. Hoobler                           
|Title: |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer and President



Date: July 5, 2005
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Daily  Weekly  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Daily  Weekly  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Daily  Weekly  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Futures Contract 4  (Dollars per Million Btu)              
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Futures Contract 4  (Dollars per Million Btu)              
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.906  | 2.054  | 1.746  | 2.270  | 2.363  | 2.332  | 2.418 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.045  | 4.103  | 3.539  | 5.401  | 6.534  | 9.185  | 8.238  | 7.811  | 9.254  | 4.882 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.658  | 4.227  | 3.109  | 3.854  | 4.218  | 2.792  | 2.778  | 3.160  | 2.967  | 2.588 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.492  | 3.748  | 6.462  | 3.041  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/5/2024                                                                                                           
|Next Release Date: 6/12/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene McNair, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, at suppression hearing; Allen G. Alpert, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 1, 1988, convicting defendant of burglary in the second degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate prison term of from 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Immediately before entering 411 West 115th Street, defendant was observed by a security officer in an adjacent building, 408 West 115th Street, which is part of the same hospital complex. Defendant argues that the admission of testimony as to defendant’s presence in the adjacent building was improper because it was evidence of an uncharged crime. While evidence of uncharged crimes is inadmissible if its only purpose is to establish defendant’s criminal propensity, such evidence may be admitted to establish intent. *(People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233.) Evidence that defendant was present in 408 West 115th Street, and that he exited the building through a window, was admissible to demonstrate that defendant intended to commit a crime in the latter building, and that defendant was not merely seeking shelter, as he claimed at trial.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be meritless. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4931 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4931

     To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 3,3'-
Dichlorobenzidine dihydrochloride ([1,1'-biphenyl]- 4,4'-diamino, 3,3'-
                              dichloro-).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

   Mr. Huizenga of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 3,3'-
Dichlorobenzidine dihydrochloride ([1,1'-biphenyl]- 4,4'-diamino, 3,3'-
                              dichloro-).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE ([1,1'-BIPHENYL]- 
              4,4'-DIAMINO, 3,3'-DICHLORO-).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 
dihydrochloride ([1,1'-biphenyl]- 4,4'-diamino, 3,3'-dichloro-)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``5.9%'' and inserting ``3.8%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Intelligentias, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ian Rice, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Ian Rice

Ian Rice





September 10, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***Certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American States Water Company andGolden State Water Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Eva G. Tang, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/  Eva G. Tang |   |
|------------------|--------|

 

EvaG. TangSenior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer,

CorporateSecretary and Treasurer

 

 

Date: December 31,2008

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5274 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5274

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pepperoncini, prepared or 
    preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pepperoncini, prepared or 
    preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PEPPERONCINI, PREPARED OR PRESERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY 
              VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID, NOT FROZEN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.27 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to pepperoncini, prepared or 
preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```