Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 44181 

• Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Are not economically significant 

regulatory actions based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Are not significant regulatory 

actions subject to Executive Order 

13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Are not subject to the requirements 

of Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 15, 2010. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, EPA New England. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18553 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010-0423; FRL–8835–7] 

Mevinphos; Proposed Data Call-in 

Order for Pesticide Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed order. 

SUMMARY: This document proposes to 

require the submission of various data 

required to support the continuation of 

the tolerances for the pesticide 

mevinphos. Pesticide tolerances are 

established under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 27, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0423, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0423. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the docket 

without change and may be made 

available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD-ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The Docket Facility telephone 

number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K. 

Avivah Jakob, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–1328; e-mail address: 

jakob.kathryn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
44182 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD-ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD-ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority 

In this document, EPA proposes to 

issue an order requiring the submission 

of various data to support the 

continuation of the mevinphos 

tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Under 

section 408(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 

346a(f), EPA is authorized to require, by 

order, submission of data ‘‘reasonably 

required to support the continuation of 

a tolerance’’ when such data cannot be 

obtained under the Data Call-In 

authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 

136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4 of the Toxic 

Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 

U.S.C. 2603. A section 408(f) Data CallIn order may only be issued following 

notice and a comment period of not less 

than 60 days. 

A section 408(f) Data Call-In order 

must contain the following elements: 

1. A requirement that one or more 

persons submit to EPA a notice 

identifying the person(s) who commit to 

submit the data required in the order. 

2. A description of the required data 

and the required reports connected to 

such data. 

3. An explanation of why the required 

data could not be obtained under 

section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4 

of TSCA. 

4. The required submission date for 

the notice identifying one or more 

interested persons who commit to 

submit the required data and the 

required submission dates for all the 

data and reports required in the order. 

(21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). 

EPA may by order modify or revoke 

the affected tolerances if any one of the 

following submissions is not made in a 

timely manner: 

• A notice identifying one or more 

interested persons who commit to 

submit the data. 

• The data itself. 

• The reports required under a 

section 408(f) order are not submitted by 

the date specified in the order. (21 

U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)). 

III. Regulatory Background for 

Mevinphos 

Mevinphos is a contact/systemic 

insecticide-acaricide. It is not currently 

registered under FIFRA and may not be 

sold, distributed, or used in the United 

States. Mevinphos’ FIFRA registration 

was canceled in 1994. However, 15 

FFDCA tolerances remain for residues of 

mevinphos on the following 

commodities: Broccoli, cabbage, 

cauliflower, celery, cucumbers, grapes, 

lettuce, melons, peas, peppers, spinach, 

strawberries, summer squash, tomatoes, 

and watermelon (40 CFR 180.157). 

Since there are currently no domestic 

registrations for mevinphos, these 

tolerances are referred to as ‘‘import 

tolerances.’’ 

Mevinphos is a member of a family of 

pesticides known as the 

organophosphates. EPA has concluded 

mevinphos and other organophosphate 

pesticides share a common mechanism 

of toxicity. As with other 

organophosphates, the principal toxic 

effects induced by mevinphos are 

related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting 

activity. It produces the associated 

clinical signs such as tremors, unsteady 

gait, decreased activity, salivation, 

disturbed balance in rats and rabbits, 

and decreased cholinesterase activity 

(plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits 

following acute, subchronic, and 

chronic oral exposure. 

In September 2000, EPA issued an 

Interim Tolerance Reassessment 

Eligibility Decision (ITRED) for 

mevinphos in connection with its 

obligation under the Food Quality 

Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), to 

evaluate whether all tolerances in 

existence at the time of the passage of 

FQPA met the revised safety standard 

that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA 

section 408. In the ITRED, EPA 

concluded that the risks of mevinphos 

when evaluated in isolation from other 

organophosphates met the revised safety 

standard in FFDCA section 408. This 

conclusion was labeled ‘‘interim,’’ 

however, because EPA had not yet 

completed a cumulative risk assessment 

for the organophosphates. In July 2006, 

EPA completed its cumulative risk 

assessment for the organophosphate 

pesticides finding that these tolerances 

met the revised safety standard. 

The ITRED called attention to several 

data gaps for mevinphos including: 

1. A developmental neurotoxicity 

(DNT) study in rats (with expanded 

protocol to extend the postnatal 

treatment period and to measure 

cholinesterase inhibition in offspring) as 

was required for all organophosphate 

pesticides. 

2. Various studies evaluating 

mevinphos residue levels on treated 

crops. EPA noted that it would be taking 

steps to require the submission of this 

data. Subsequently, the manufacturer of 

mevinphos submitted residue data for 

grapes and frozen storage stability data 

for broccoli, cucumbers, lettuce, 

tomatoes, and strawberries. However, 

the registrant has not submitted a DNT 

study or residue data for the remaining 

imported commodities. 

Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and 

implementing regulations, EPA has 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 44183 

established a review program for 

pesticides registered under FIFRA. The 

goal of that program is a periodic review 

of pesticide registrations every 15 years 

to ensure that the registrations satisfy 

FIFRA standards and are based on 

‘‘current scientific and other knowledge 

regarding the pesticide.’’ (40 CFR 

155.40(a)). EPA is in the preliminary 

stages of the registration review process 

for organophosphate pesticides. 

Although mevinphos is not registered 

under FIFRA, EPA will be re-examining 

mevinphos with the other registered 

organophosphates because of the 

organophosphates shared mechanism of 

toxicity. 

In re-examining mevinphos, EPA has 

identified several studies noted in the 

ITRED as data gaps for which data have 

not been submitted and one new 

regulatory data requirement for which a 

study is needed. These data are 

necessary to support the continuation of 

mevinphos tolerances and are listed 

below. 

IV. Data Requirements 

A. Required Data and Reports 

Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f), 

EPA has determined that additional data 

are reasonably required to support the 

continuation of the tolerances for 

mevinphos which are codified at 40 

CFR 180.157. Accordingly, EPA 

proposes to issue a final order requiring 

the submission of the following data: 

1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay 

(Test Guideline 870.6300). A protocol 

and a final report are required. 

Rationale. As an organophosphate 

pesticide (OP), inhibition of 

acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the 

critical effect for use in human health 

risk assessment. Many OPs were subject 

to a Data-Call-In for the developmental 

neurotoxicity study (DNT). This DCI 

also included the requirement for AChE 

inhibition data to evaluate comparative 

sensitivity in juvenile and adult rats. 

These data are most often collected in 

a study called the comparative 

cholinesterase assay (CCA). Since that 

time, CCA studies for more than 20 OPs 

have been submitted to OPP. Although 

for some OPs no difference in sensitivity 

has been observed in juvenile and adult 

animals, for many of the OPs, juveniles 

have been shown to be more sensitive. 

At this time, OPP has determined that 

a CCA is required for mevinphos to 

evaluate the potential for increased 

sensitivity in juvenile animals 

compared with that of adult animals. 

Given that the AChE data provided in 

the CCAs have provided more sensitive 

results than DNT studies for the OPs, a 

DNT study for mevinphos is not 

required at this time. 

2. Immunotoxicity Study (Test 

Guideline 870.7800). A final report and 

protocol are required. 

Rationale. This is a new data 

requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as 

a part of the data requirements for 

registration of a pesticide (food and nonfood uses). 

The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline 

(Harmonized Guideline 870.7800) 

prescribes functional immunotoxicity 

testing and is designed to evaluate the 

potential of a repeated chemical 

exposure to produce adverse effects (i.e., 

suppression) on the immune system. 

Immunosuppression is a deficit in the 

ability of the immune system to respond 

to a challenge of bacterial or viral 

infections such as tuberculosis (TB), 

severe acquired respiratory syndrome 

(SARS), or neoplasia. 

3. Directions for Use (Test Guideline 

860.1200) 

Rationale. The Agency needs use 

directions, which appear on the Mexico 

label(s). 

4. Crop Field Trials (Test Guideline 

860.1500) – (broccoli, cabbage, 

cauliflower, celery, grapes, lettuce, peas, 

peppers, spinach, strawberries, summer 

squash, and tomatoes.) 

Rationale. Field trials are required for 

each commodity/commodity group 

according to guidelines that take into 

account where the crop is grown and 

how much of the crop is grown. Field 

trials are required for each type of 

formulation because the formulation can 

have significant effect on the magnitude 

of the pesticide residue left on the crop. 

Residue trials also need to represent the 

maximum application rate on the label 

and have a geographic distribution 

representative of the commodity/ 

commodity group. On June 1, 2000 (65 

FR 35069) (FRL–6559–3), EPA 

published in the Federal Register, a 

Notice which provided detailed 

guidance on applying current U.S. data 

requirements for the establishment or 

continuance of tolerances for pesticide 

residues in or on imported foods. A 

copy of that Notice is available in the 

docket of this proposed order. That 

Notice contains instructions for 

determining number and location of 

field trials. 

5. Processing Study (tomatoes) (Test 

Guideline 860.1520) 

Rationale. Processing studies are 

required to determine whether residues 

in raw commodities may be expected to 

degrade or concentrate during food 

processing. If residues concentrate in a 

processed commodity, a food or feed 

additive tolerance must be established. 

If residues do not concentrate in a 

processed commodity, the tolerance for 

the raw agricultural commodity applies 

to all processed food or feed derived 

from it. 

B. Persons who Commit to Submit the 

Required Data 

After this 60–day comment period 

closes, the Agency will respond to 

comments, if appropriate, and may issue 

a final order requiring the submission of 

various data for mevinphos in the 

Federal Register. If EPA issues such an 

order, persons who are interested in the 

continuation of the mevinphos 

tolerances must notify the Agency by 

completing and submitting the required 

‘‘§408(f) Order Response’’ form 

(available in the docket) within 90 days 

after publication of the final order in the 

Federal Register. 

The ‘‘§408(f) Order Response Form’’ 

requires the identification of persons 

who will submit the required data and 

lists the options available to support the 

required data: 

i. Develop new data. 

ii. Submit an Existing Study — submit 

existing data not submitted previously to the 

Agency by anyone, 

iii. Upgrade a Study – submit or cite data 

to upgrade a study classified by EPA as 

partially acceptable and upgradable, 

iv. Cite an Existing Study – cite an existing 

study that EPA classified as acceptable or an 

existing study that has been submitted but 

not reviewed by the Agency. 

C. Required Dates for Submission of 

Data/Reports 

The table below lists the time 

allocated for both the completion and 

submission of each study. The required 

submission date is calculated from the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of the final order. 

Guideline Requirement Number Study Title Timeframe for protocol submission Timeframe for data submission 

860.1200 Directions for use Not required 12 months 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
44184 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Guideline Requirement Number Study Title Timeframe for protocol submission Timeframe for data submission 

860.1500 Crop Field Trials (broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, celery, 

grapes, lettuce, peas, peppers, 

spinach, strawberries, summer 

squash, and tomatoes) 

Not Required 24 months 

860.1520 Processing studies (tomatoes) Not Required 24 months 

870.6300 Comparative Cholinesterase 

Assay 

6 months 12 months 

870.7800 Immunotoxicity Study 6 months 12 months 

D. Failure to Submit 

If the Agency does not receive a 

§408(f) Response Form identifying a 

person who agrees to submit the 

required data within 90 days after 

publication of the final order, EPA will 

proceed to revoke the mevinphos 

tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Such 

revocation order is subject to the 

objection and hearing procedure in 

FFDCA section 408(g)(2) but the only 

material issue in such a procedure is 

whether a submission required by the 

order was made in a timely fashion. 

Additional events that may be the 

basis for modification or revocation of 

mevinphos tolerances include, but are 

not limited to the following: 

1. No person submits on the required 

schedule an acceptable proposal or final 

protocol when such is required to be 

submitted to the Agency for review. 

2. No person submits on the required 

schedule an adequate progress report on 

a study as required by the order. 

3. No person submits on the required 

schedule acceptable data as required by 

the final order. 

4. No person submits supportable 

certifications as to the conditions of 

submitted data, where required by order 

and where no other cited or submitted 

study meets the data requirements the 

study was intended to fulfill. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

As required by statute, this proposal 

to require submission of data in support 

of tolerances is in the form of an order 

and not a rule. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). 

Under the Administrative Procedures 

Act, orders are expressly excluded from 

the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C. 

551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory 

assessment requirements imposed on 

rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to 

this action. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 22, 2010. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18541 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0490; FRL–8834–1] 

Aluminum tris(O-ethylphosphonate), 

Butylate, Chlorethoxyfos, Clethodim, 

et al.; Proposed Tolerance Actions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with current 

Agency practice to describe more clearly 

the measurement and scope or coverage 

of the tolerances, EPA is proposing 

minor revisions to tolerance expressions 

for a number of pesticide active 

ingredients, including the insecticides 

chlorethoxyfos, clofentezine, 

cyromazine, etofenprox, fenbutatinoxide, fosthiazate, propetamphos, and 

tebufenozide; the fungicides aluminum 

tris(O-ethylphosphonate) and fenarimol; 

the herbicides butylate, clethodim, 

clomazone, fenoxaprop-ethyl, 

flumetsulam, flumiclorac pentyl, 

fluridone, fomesafen, glufosinate 

ammonium, lactofen, propyzamide, 

quinclorac, and pyridate; and the 

fungicide/bactericide oxytetracycline. 

Also, EPA is proposing to revoke the 

tolerances for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate) on pineapple fodder 

and forage because they are not 

considered to be significant livestock 

feed items, and revise specific tolerance 

nomenclatures for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate), clethodim, 

flumetsulam, and fluridone. In addition, 

EPA will be removing several expired 

tolerances for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate), etofenprox, 

propyzamide, and tebufenozide. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 27, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0490, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the oNline instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 

0490. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the docket 

without change and may be made 

available oN-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS