59410 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices

Mariposa-Humble and Gyp-hill lines

and for this reason producers can

deliver gas in the Tennessee’s system

only when the operating pressure of the

mainlines are lower than the pressure

within the supply laterals. Tennessee

states that the operating pressure on

Tennessee’s Line No. 400–1 can range as

high as 903 psig and 860 psig on Line

No. 400–2. Thus, Tennessee states that

it has proposed these uprates so it can

consistently and reliably receive natural

gas from the affected producers on these

lateral lines. Tennessee indicates that

the total cost of the uprates is estimated

to be from $5,000 to $15,000.

Tennessee states that Thomas G.

Joyce, Certificates Manager, P.O. Box

2511, Houston, Texas 77252 at (713)

420–2459 can be contacted for any

further questions on this application.

Any person or the Commission’s Staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefore,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–25508 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97–255–013]

TransColorado Gas Transmission

Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 29, 2000.

Take notice that on September 27,

2000, TransColorado Gas Transmission

Company (TransColorado) tendered for

filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1, Thirteenth

Revised Sheet No. 21 and Ninth Revised

Sheet No. 22. to be effective September

16, 2000.

TransColorado states that the filing

has been filed in compliance with the

Commission’s letter order issued March

20, 1997, in Docket No. RP97–255–000.

The tendered tariff sheets revised

TransColorado’s Tariff to amend its

negotiated-rate firm transportation

service agreement with Dominion

Exploration & Production.

TransColorado requested waiver of 18

CFR 154.207 so that the tendered tariff

sheets may become effective September

16, 2000.

TransColorado stated that a copy of

this filing has been served upon all

parties to this proceeding,

TransColorado’s customers, the

Colorado Public Utilities Commission

and the New Mexico Public Utilities

Commission.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

be viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–25512 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC00–106–000, et al.]

Entergy Power Marketing Corp., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

September 28, 2000.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Entergy Power Marketing Corp. and

Koch Energy Trading, Inc.

[Docket No. EC00–106–000]

Take notice that on September 26,

2000, Entergy power Marketing Corp.

(EPMC) and Koch Energy Trading, Inc.

(KET) (Collectively, Applicants) filed a

response to a letter dated September 14,

2000 from Commission staff (Staff)

requesting additional information and

an amended competitive analysis for

Applicants’ pending application under

Section 203 of the Federal Power Act,

16 U.S.C. 824d (1994).

Comment date: October 11, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power

Company

[Docket No. ER97–913–003]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000 , Connecticut Yankee Atomic

Power Company filed an Informational

Filing regarding the consolidation of its

pre-1983 Spent Fuel Trust and its

Decommissioning Trust . The

Informational Filing was made in

compliance with the Offer of Settlement

dated April 7, 2000, as supplemented

April 27, 2000, which was approved by

the Commission’s Letter Order dated

July 26, 2000.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Baconton Power LLC

[Docket Nos. EC00–143–000 and ER00–2398–

001 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that on September 22,

2000, as supplemented on September

26, 2000, Baconton Power LLC

(Baconton or the Applicant) submitted

for filing an application under section

203 of the Federal Power Act for

approval of the indirect transfer of

control over Baconton’s jurisdictional

transmission facilities and paper

facilities. At present, SOWEGA Energy

Resources, LLC owns an 85 percent

interest in Baconton and Tejas Power

Generation, LLC (Tejas) owns a 15

percent interest. The Applicant states

that the transfer of control will occur as

a result of a change in the upstream

ownership of Tejas, currently a whollyowned indirect subsidiary of Shell Oil

Company, to InterGen N.V., a to-beformed company to be indirectly owned

68 percent by the Royal Dutch

Petroleum Company and The ‘‘Shell’’

Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.,

and 32 percent by Bechtel Enterprises

Holdings, Inc. Baconton also submitted

in the September 22 filing a notice of

change of status with respect to its

market-based rate tariff authority

granted in Docket No. ER00–2398–000.

On September 26, 2000, Baconton

supplemented its filing in EC00–143–

000 to provide materials in fulfillment

of the Exhibit H filing requirements

found in the Commission’s regulations

at 18 CFR 33.3. Baconton requests

privileged treatment for the Exhibit H

materials filed in the September 26

supplement, as provided for under 18

CFR 388.112 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices 59411

Comment date: October 17, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation

[Docket No. ER97–2353–005]

Take notice that on September 18,

2000, New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation (NYSEG) tendered for filing

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission (Commission) a refund

report.

Comment date: October 10, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Union Electric Company, d/b/a/

Ameren UE, and Ameren Energy, Inc.

on behalf of AmerenUE

[Docket No. ER00–2687–001]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Ameren Energy, Inc., on behalf of

AmerenUE, tendered for filing an

updated market analysis in connection

with its market-based rate authority.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. EnergyUSA–TPC Corporation

[Docket No. ER00–3219–001]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, EnergyUSA–TPC Corporation

(EnergyUSA), an indirect wholly owned

subsidiary of NiSource, Inc., tendered

for filing its FERC Electric Rate

Schedule 1 and a Statement of Policy

and Code of Conduct.

EnergyUSA seeks an effective date of

September 18, 2000 for the tariff sheets

submitted with this filing.

EnergyUSA states that this filing is

being made to comply with the

Commission’s August 24, 2000, order in

this docket. In particular, the filing

contains appropriate tariff sheet

designations.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Arizona Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER00–3283–001]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Arizona Public Service Company

(APS) tendered for filing a revised rate

schedule, APS–FERC Rate Schedule No.

225 in compliance with FERC Order in

this docket issued September 20, 2000.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Arizona Corporation Commission

and Citizens Utilities Company.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Virginia Electric and Power

Company

[Docket No. ER00–3743–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Virginia Electric and Power

Company (Virginia Power or the

Company) tendered for filing a Network

Integration Transmission Service and

Network Operating Agreement (Service

Agreement) by Virginia Electric and

Power Company to Dominion Energy

Direct Sales, Inc. designated as Service

Agreement No. 302 under the

Company’s Retail Access Pilot Program,

pursuant to Attachment L of the

Company’s Open Access Transmission

Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Second

Revised Volume No. 5, to Eligible

Purchasers effective June 7, 2000.

Virginia Power requests an effective

date of September 25, 2000, the date of

filing of the Service Agreement.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Duquesne Light Company

[Docket No. ER00–3744–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Duquesne Light Company (DLC)

filed a Service Agreement for Retail

Network Integration Transmission

Service and a Network Operating

Agreement for Retail Network

Integration Transmission Service dated

September 22, 2000, The New Power

Company under DLC’s Open Access

Transmission Tariff (Tariff). The Service

Agreement and Network Operating

Agreement adds The New Power

Company as a customer under the

Tariff.

DLC requests an September 22, 2000

of September 22, 2000 for the Service

Agreement.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Sierra Pacific Power Company

[Docket No. ER00–3745–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Sierra Pacific Power Company

(Sierra) tendered for filing executed

Service Agreements (Agreements) with

Pacificorp Power Marketing for NonFirm and Short-Term Firm

Transmission Service under Sierra

Pacific Resources Operating Companies,

FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume

No. 1, Open Access Transmission Tariff

(Tariff).

Sierra filed the executed Agreements

with the Commission in compliance

with Section 13.4 and 14.4 of the Tariff

and applicable Commission regulations.

Sierra also submitted Original Sheet

Nos. 173 and 173A (Attachment E) to

the Tariff, which is an updated list of all

current subscribers.

Sierra requests waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements to

permit and effective date of September

26, 2000 for Attachment E, and to allow

the Agreements to become effective

according to their terms.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of

Nevada, the Public Utilities Commission

of California and all interested parties.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Dominion Nuclear Marketing III,

L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER00–3746–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Dominion Nuclear Marketing III,

L.L.C. tendered for filing its proposed

FERC Electric Market-Based Sales Tariff

and requested certain waivers of the

Commission’s regulations.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Mid-Continent Area Power Pool

[Docket No. ER00–3747–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, the Mid-Continent Area Power

Pool (MAPP), on behalf of its members

that are subject to Commission

jurisdiction as public utilities under

Section 201(e) of the Federal Power Act,

filed an amendment to Schedule R of

the Restated Agreement that would

extend provision of the redispatch

service from October 31, 2000 to

October 31, 2001.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. South Carolina Electric & Gas

Company

[Docket No. ER00–3748–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, South Carolina Electric & Gas

Company (SCE&G) submitted a service

agreement establishing Sempra Energy

Trading Corp. as a customer under the

terms of SCE&G’s Negotiated Market

Sales Tariff.

Copies of this filing were served upon

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. and the

South Carolina Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Boston Edison Company

[Docket No. ER00–3749–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Boston Edison Company (Boston

59412 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 194 / Thursday, October 5, 2000 / Notices

Edison) tendered for filing a Standstill

Agreement between itself and New

England Power Company (NEP) as

successor-in-interest to Montaup

Electric Company (Montaup). The

Standstill Agreement extends through

December 4, 2000 the time in which

NEP may institute a legal challenge to

the 1998 true-up bill under Boston

Edison’s FERC Rate Schedule No. 69,

governing sales to Montaup from the

Pilgrim Nuclear Station.

Boston Edison requests waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirement to

allow the Standstill Agreement to

become effective September 26, 2000.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. California Independent System

Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER00–3750–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, the California Independent

System Operator Corporation tendered

for filing a Scheduling Coordinator

Agreement between the ISO and Enron

Energy Services, Inc. for acceptance by

the Commission.

The ISO is requesting waiver of the

60-day notice requirement to allow the

Scheduling Coordinator Agreement to

be made effective as of September 15,

2000.

The ISO states that this filing has been

served on Enron Energy Services, Inc.

and the California Public Utilities

Commission.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. ANP Funding I, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER00–3751–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000 ANP Funding I, L.L.C. tendered for

filing pursuant to Rules 205 and 207 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.205 and

385.207) a petition seeking waivers and

blanket approvals under various

regulations of the Commission, and an

order accepting its FERC Electric Rate

Schedule No. 1 for filing, to be effective

on the date of the Commission’s order

on such petition.

FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 1

provides for the sale of energy and

capacity at agreed prices.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Arizona Public Service Company, El

Paso Electric Company, Public Service

Company of New Mexico, and Southern

California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER00–3752–000]

Take notice that on September 25,

2000, Arizona Public Service Company,

El Paso Electric Company, Public

Service Company of New Mexico, and

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing a Funding Agreement

for the Development of a Satellite

Switchyard to the ANPP High Voltage

Switchyard Between Participating

Interconnectors and Salt River Project

Agricultural Improvement and Power

District.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. Chicago Housing Authority

[Docket No. TX98–1–000]

Take notice that on September 5,

2000, Chicago Housing Authority filed a

Notice of Withdrawal of its application

filed in the above-mentioned proceeding

on November 14, 1997.

Comment date: October 19, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest such filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection. This filing may also be

viewed on the Internet at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/ online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–25506 Filed 10–4–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC00–138–000, et al.]

Sithe Energies, Inc., et al. Electric Rate

and Corporate Regulation Filings

September 29, 2000.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Sithe Energies, Inc. and the Sithe

Stockholders, Exelon (Fossil) Holdings,

Inc., PECO Energy Company, and

Exelon Generation Company, L.L.C.

[Docket No. EC00–138–000]

Take notice that on September 22,

2000, and September 26, 2000, Sithe

Energies, Inc. and the Sithe

Stockholders, Exelon (Fossil) Holdings,

Inc., PECO Energy Company and Exelon

Generation Company, L.L.C.

(collectively, Applicants) filed

supplements to their September 13,

2000, application (initial application) in

this proceeding. The September 22,

2000, supplement is an errata correcting

corporate structure charts that were

included in Attachment B of the initial

application. The September 26, 2000,

supplement is the Sithe Energies, Inc.

and Exelon (Fossil) Holdings, Inc. Joint

Petition for Approval to Transfer Stock,

which was filed with the New York

Public Service Commission on

September 14, 2000, and that relates to

the transaction for which authorization

is sought in the Docket No. EC00–138–

000 proceeding.

Comment date: October 16, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. ISO New England Inc.

[Docket No. EL00–62–011]

Take notice that on September 26,

2000, the New England Power Pool

(NEPOOL) Participants Committee

submitted the Sixty-Fifth Agreement

Amending the Restated NEPOOL

Agreement and the Sixty-Sixth

Agreement Amending the Restated

NEPOOL Agreement in response to the

90-day compliance requirements of the

Commission’s June 28, 2000 order in

Docket Nos. EL00–62–000 et al., ISO

New England Inc., 91 FERC ¶ 61,311

(2000) concerning the implementation

of a congestion management system and

multi-settlement system. In accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s June 28, 2000 order,

NEPOOL has noted an effective date of

September 26, 2000, or such other date

as the Commission deems appropriate.

The NEPOOL Participants Committee

states that copies of these materials were