alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: November 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 226)]
[Notices]               
[Page 71674]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24no10-65]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, December 1, 2010; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS:  Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered:

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 19, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29830 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-493-001]

Take notice that on September 20, 2000, Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc. (Midcoast) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of March 27, 2000.

Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 88A

Sub Fifth Revised Sheet No. 89

Sub Third Revised Sheet No. 90

Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 92

Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 103

Midcoast states that the filing is being filed to comply with the conditions contained in the Commission's September 12, 2000 Letter Order in this docket that accepted its filing to eliminate from its tariff provisions that are inconsistent with the Commission's decision in Order Nos. 637 and 637-A to remove the rate ceiling for short term capacity release transactions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24991 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
GALDEN HT200 is a perfluoropolyether having the following chemical structrure:

CF3 - (OCFCF2)n - (OCF2)m - OCF3

CF3 

GALDEN HT200 is a High Performance, inert fluid suitable for use in HEAT TRANSFER

and DIELECTRIC APPLICATIONS requiring:

• High Thermal Stability

• Good Dielectric Properties

• Excellent Chemical Inertness

• Good Compatibility with metals, plastics and elastomers

• No Flash or Fire Point, No AutoIgnition Point

• Safety

Operating temperature range: from -20° to 190°C.

PROPERTY

Normal Boiling Point

Pour Point

Kinematic Viscosity @ -20°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Density @ -20°C

“ @ 25°C

Surface Tension @ 25°C

Vapor Pressure @ 25°C

Specific Heat @ -20°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Heat of Vaporization at Boiling Point

Thermal Conductivity @ -20°C

“ “ @ 25°C

Dielectric Strength @ 25°C

Dielectric Constant @ 25°C

Volume Resistivity @ 25°C

Solubility of Water

Solubility of Air

Flash Point

Molecular Weight

Units

°C

°C

cSt

“

g/cm3

“

Dyne/cm

Torr

cal/g°C

“ 

cal/g

W/m K

“

kV

2.54 mm gap

-

Ohm-cm

mg/Kg

ml gas/100ml liq

°C

amu

HT200

200

-85

11.7

2.4

1.89

1.79

19

0.2

0.200

0.232

15

0.069

0.065

40

1.94

6x1015

14

26

None

870

HT200

G

A

L

D

E

N

®

H

EAT

T

R

A

N

S

F

E

R

F

L

UID
SOLVAY SOLEXIS SpA 

Viale Lombardia, 20

I-20021 Bollate, Milan - Italy

Phone +39 02 3835 1

Fax +39 02 3835 2129

solvaysolexisinfo@solvay.com

www.solvaysolexis.com

www.solvay.com

www.pfpefluids.com

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

1,300

1,400

1,500

1,600

1,700

1,800

1,900

2,000

Whilst every care has been taken by Solvay Solexis S.p.A. in the preparation of this document, no warranty is given to its

accuracy and completeness, nor as to compliance with laws so far as they may affect the content of this document.

Local laws and regulations (i.e. on consumers protection, safety, health and environment) are applicable.

The users shall be solely responsible of their respect.

Furthermore, freedom of use under patent or other similar rights should not be assumed.

April, 2005

NAFTA container size 7kg (15.4lb)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40041

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

OMAR ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1314-1 

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Omar Orlando Rodriguez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following 

deportation and was sentenced to a 33-month term of imprisonment. On 

appeal, he renews his challenge to the district court’s application of the 

eight-level aggravated felony enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). The 

gravamen of his position is that, in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 

2551 (2015), the definition of a crime of violence in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40041 Document: 00514072240 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2017
No. 17-40041

2 

unconstitutionally vague on its face. Therefore, he contends, his Texas 

conviction of evading arrest with a motor vehicle does not qualify as a crime of 

violence under § 16(b) and thus is not an aggravated felony for purposes of 8 

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) and § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). 

As Rodriguez concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. 

Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670, 672-77 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for 

cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259), in which we rejected a constitutional 

challenge to § 16(b) as facially vague. 

Accordingly, Rodriguez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Rodriguez’s 

alternative motion to hold his appeal in abeyance pending decisions by the 

Supreme Court in Gonzalez-Longoria and Sessions v. Dimaya, 137 S. Ct. 31 

(2016) is DENIED. See Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 

1986). 

 Case: 17-40041 Document: 00514072240 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2017
Exhibit 32.2



PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the annual report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank De Costanzo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



Date: December 30, 2016





/s/ Frank De Costanzo

Frank De Costanzo

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer of the registrant)
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Antonis Bertsos, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of NewLeadHoldings Ltd.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 9, 2014
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration September 17, 2015 BY PERSONAL DELIVERY Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Office of the Chief Counsel

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Re: In the matter ofNational Power Corporation; FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 

# RECEI\/ED SEP 1

## 72015 HEARING DOCKET

I hereby file my Notice ofAppearance in this matter. Going forward, I will be the attorney ofrecord and all communications for the Federal Aviation Administration should be addressedto Charles Raley, Attorney, Enforcement Division/AGC-300, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591, (202) 267-3357, facsimile (202) 267-5106. Sincerely, Peter Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement

By: 

### _:c;;Q====· 

# ==·

# ~=·:::·=== Charles Raley, Attorney Email: charles.raley(al,faa.gov Cc by Certified Mail: Martin A. Blumenthal, Esq. 1Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 Northfield, IL 60093
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NITRO FLUIDS, L.L.C., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-00125 

JURY TRIAL REQUESTED 

 

JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 

The parties submit the below Joint Claim Construction Statement in accord with the 

Court’s Order Governing Proceedings (ECF No. 20). 

A. Agreed-Upon Constructions 

The parties have reached a general agreement that “fracturing tree” means “a tree having 

at least one valve that can control the flow of fracturing fluid during a fracturing operation,” but 

the parties dispute whether this construction encompasses ordinary production trees. 

B. Disputed Claim Constructions 

The disputed terms, including each party’s proposed construction for each disputed term, 

are attached as Exhibit A. 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00125-ADA Document 50 Filed 10/10/20 Page 1 of 3
 2 

DATED: October 10, 2020 

/s/ J. David Cabello 

J. David Cabello 

Attorney-in-Charge 

J. David Cabello 

Texas Bar No. 03574500 

James H. Hall 

Texas Bar No. 24041040 

Stephen D. Zinda 

Texas Bar No. 24084147 

CABELLO HALL ZINDA, PLLC 

801 Travis Street, Suite 1610 

Houston, TX 77002 

Tel: 832-631-9990 

Fax: 832-631-9991 

Email: david@chzfirm.com 

Email: james@chzfirm.com 

Email: stephen@chzfirm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Nitro Fluids, LLC

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ John R. Keville

John R. Keville 

Texas Bar No. 00794085 

jkeville@winston.com 

Merritt D. Westcott (Pro Hac Vice) 

Texas Bar No. 24027091 

mwestcott@winston.com 

William M. Logan 

Texas Bar No. 24106214 

wlogan@winston.com 

Evan D. Lewis (Pro Hac Vice) 

Texas Bar No. 24116670 

edlewis@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

800 Capitol Street, Suite 2400 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 651-2600 

Facsimile: (713) 651-2700 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00125-ADA Document 50 Filed 10/10/20 Page 2 of 3
 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 10th day of October, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

 J. David Cabello 

 david@chzfirm.com 

 James H. Hall 

 james@chzfirm.com 

 Stephen D. Zinda 

 stephen@chzfirm.com 

 CABELLO HALL ZINDA, PLLC 

 801 Travis Street, Suite 1610 

 Houston, TX 77002 

 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, 

 NITRO FLUIDS L.L.C. 

 /s/ John R. Keville 

 John R. Keville 

Case 6:20-cv-00125-ADA Document 50 Filed 10/10/20 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT  4 (a)

                                OFFER TO PURCHASE
                                -----------------

NAME:  KEVIN  MARKLAND

      of the city/town of TORONTO in the province of ONTARIO (as Purchaser)

     HEREBY  AGREES  TO  AND  WITH  DEALCHECK.COM  INC.  (as Vendor) to purchase
1,415,000 common shares of World Vacation Club.com (WVC) owned by the Vendor for
$10  (ten  dollar  only)  and  subject  to the condition described herein, which
amount  is  hereby  considered  fully  paid  by  way of the purchaser completing
certain  work  on  the  web  site  of  the  vendor to the vendor's satisfaction.

Condition  which  will survive the sale for a period of five years from the date
of  this  Agreement  -

Should  the  purchaser  dispose of the purchased shares in WVC at a price higher
than  $10, the excess over $10 will be shared with the Vendor at the rate of 80%
to  the  vendor  and  20%  to  the  Purchaser

     The  Vendor  represents  and  warrants  that  IT is the owner of the assets
herein agreed to be purchased, and that the same are free and clear of all liens
and  encumbrances whatsoever. It also warrants that the existing shareholders of
WVC  do  not have any objection to the sale of the said shares to the Purchaser.

     The  Purchaser  acknowledges  that  it  is  aware  of  the  facts  that:

          I.   WVC  is  a private company and its common shares currently do not
             have  any  market  and  are  not  trading  publicly,  and

          II.  The  proposed  business  of  WVC  may require certain licences or
             other filings to comply with regulatory requirements in order for
             WVC  to  engage  in  its  proposed  businesses.

     This  Offer  when  accepted shall constitute a binding contract of purchase
and  sale,  and  time in all respects shall be of the essence of this Agreement.

     The  parties  hereto  agree  that  there  is  no  representation,  warranty
collateral  agreement or condition affecting this Agreement or stipulated hereby
other  than  as  expressed  herein  in  writing.

     This  Offer  and  its  acceptance  to be read with all changes of gender or
number  required  by  the  context.



DATED  at  TORONTO  this  22ND  day  of  MARCH,  2001.

SIGNED, SEALED AND                      )
DELIVERED  in  the                      )     /s/  Kevin  Markland
presence  of                            )     ----------------------
                                        )     Kevin  Markland
                                        )

The undersigned Vendor hereby accepts the foregoing offer.

DATED  at  TORONTO  this  22ND  day  of  MARCH  2001.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE have hereunto set OUR hand and seal.

SIGNED,  SEALED  AND                    )
DELIVERED  in  the                      )     /s/  Terence  Robinson
presence  of                            )     ----------------------
                                        )     FOR DEALCHECK.COM INC.
                                        )     TERENCE  ROBINSON
                                        )     CEO


                                                                              62
<PAGE>
```
**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                             ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Quarterly Report"), of Southern California Edison Company (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 9, 2005

                                                      /s/ Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      -----------------------------------------------
                                                      Alan J. Fohrer
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

                                                      /s/ Thomas M. Noonan
                                                      -----------------------------------------------
                                                      Thomas M. Noonan
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Southern California Edison Company

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
#### In the Matter of Charles C., Appellant. Rockland Psychiatric Center, Respondent.

In a proceeding for permission to administer antipsychotic medication to a patient *538without consent, the patient appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), dated August 20, 1990, which, after a hearing, granted the application.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and facts, without costs or disbursements, and the application is denied.

The Rockland Psychiatric Center (hereinafter the Center) failed to meet its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the appellant lacks the capacity to make a reasoned decision regarding the proposed treatment in accordance with the due process considerations set forth in *Rivers v Katz*(67 NY2d 485, 497-498). The Center’s witness, the appellant’s treating psychiatrist, testified that he was uncertain whether the appellant was capable of making a reasoned decision regarding his treatment. In addition, he expressed the belief that the psychotic features of the appellant’s depressive disorder were in remission, and that the appellant’s recent behavioral problems were the result of malingering rather than actual illness. Nevertheless, the witness testified that he felt comfortable with the proposed treatment in the event that the appellant’s recent problems were the result of mental illness. We find that his testimony was not clear and convincing evidence of the appellant’s lack of capacity *(cf., Matter of Adele*S. *v Kingsboro Psychiatric Center,*149 AD2d 424; *Matter of Eleanor R. v South Oaks Hosp.,*123 AD2d 460). Nor did the fact that the appellant’s testimony was somewhat rambling and incoherent provide the necessary proof. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.