Space Coast Video Productions

Aaron Hande 5712 Chicory Dr Titusville, Florida 32780 spacecoastvideoproductions@gmail.com

March 4 , 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 6319

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is in response to the request for more information made by reviewer Dale Williams on February 24, 2016 for docket number FAA

- 2015

- 6319. In this letter, Mr. Williams requests clarification
on the below items:

 The Specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest

 The reasons why the exemption would not adver sely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

1. Specific section or s ections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief

The regulations the petition is seeking exemption from are outlined on page 2 of the petition, also as
show below:

14 CFR Part 21

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b)
14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a)14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2)
14 C.F.R. 91.103
14 C.F.R. 91.109
14 C.F. R. 91.119
14 C.F.R. 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b)

Please also see page 4

- 10 of the submitted petition for the specific details for each section. The specific sections and the extent of the relief the petition is seeking is identical to the below approved exemptions: 14832, 15053, 14800

2. The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest

By granting thi s petition, the petitioner will remove the danger of having a manned aircraft conducting
low a l titude using internal combustion engines with a lightweight battery

- powered unmanned aircraft following a strict safety operational manual

. T he public will no lo nger be subjected to the same level of
risk that comes with model c ombustion engine manned aircrafts, which generate more noise and air pollution than a sUAS

. In exemption s 14832, 15053 and 14800

– which are identical to this petition, the reviewer found it to be
in the public’s best inter e st to approve the petition. This petition should be treated no differently

.

3. The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

The petition outlines a stringent safety protocol on page 4 of the petition, as well as appendix B. Appendix B outlines the safety manual that the petition will follow. As a precedent, this safety manual reviewed and approved in the following p etitions: 14832, 15053, 14800

.

4. Additional Information.

This petition for exemption is materially identical to many that have already been approved, and as such we ask that this petition be approved as well. To name a few, this petition for exemption is identical to exemptions 14832, 15053, 14800

.

Thank you for your time,

Aaron Hande