alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 8 Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 8 Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,126  | 127    | 237    | 230    | 304    | 488    | 955    | 356    | 113    | 290   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 409    | 213    | 446    | 684    | 872    | 383    | 806    | 471    | 832    | 1,225 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 546    | 2,987  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### WILSON v. WILSON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 13, 1953.

J. Rivers Wright, Louisville, for appellant.

Robert J. Spéckman, Louisville, for ap-pellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The judgment of divorce of Helen Wilson from Dale Wilson entered in December, 1947, incorporated an agreement that the custody of their three children, aged 7, 5, and 1 1⁄2 years, should be with the father so long as his mother “remains in such a state of health as to supervise the rearing of said children.” It was contemplated that the children would live with their father’s parents on a small farm in Warren County subject to the mother’s visitation. Both parents of the children continued to live in Louisville. The agreement further stated that “if and when the defendant’s mother becomes incapacitated” the parties would endeavor to settle the matter of custody and maintenance.

The mother of the children remarried soon after the divorce. She ’'happened to see the children in the care of a lady friend of their father on a street in Louisville and promptly- moved the ■ court to modify the judgment and award her the custody. It appears the children were in Louisville: for a week or so while their grandmother was away from home.

The mother and her 'husband, own a small home in Louisville and both of them are able and anxious to have the children. The court found without difficulty that the mother is fit and suitable to have their custody and rearing. It does not appear that the father is in position to care for them himself. The grandparents are estimable people and the mother finds no fault in them. The grandmother, as the court stated, is not in the best of health and must visit her physician frequently, although she testified that she is in better health than when the children were placed in her care. The court concluded that “the. scales are about evenly balanced between the two homes” insofar a.s the welfare of the children is concerned. While he believed the boys would be happier in the country, the educational facilities of the city are better. Weighing all' the evidence and circumstances, which are detailed in his opinion, and influenced by the rule that a parent is entitled to his or her children as against custody by the grandparents, the court modified the origi*50nal judgment and. awarded the children to their mother. Whalen v. Boles, 314 Ky. 817, 236 S.W.2d 885; Montgomery v. Abel, Ky., 239 S.W.2d 60. The order provides that the father may visit the children at reasonable times and shall contribute $15 a week for their maintenance. We see no reason to disturb the modified judgment, which was entered in June, 1951.

Judgment is affirmed.
#### MERKEL v. STATE.

No. 24547.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted for rape of Kathrine Hapak, a little girl three years of age, but the trial resulted in a conviction for as*184sault with intent to rape, punishment being assessed at 10 years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception appear in the record. The State’s case, in the main, was made out by the testimony of the little girl’s six-year-old brother, and of a physician who examined the little girl shortly after the assault.

It would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State to set out the sordid details of the facts upon which the State relies for a conviction. It is sufficient to state that they support the verdict and judgment.

Appellant’s evidence raised the issue of alibi, which was properly submitted to the jury, but decided adversely to appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
      12.1





CERTIFICATION





I,
      Gengchen Han, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Origin Agritech
      Limited;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      company's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
      auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and





(b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      February 15, 2007






/s/
      Gengchen Han





Name:
      Gengchen Han


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Emery, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from his conviction of two counts of first degree sodomy of the 11-year-old daughter of his girlfriend, defendant contends that the court erred in amending an allegation of the indictment to conform to the People’s proof, that the court erred in allowing the child complainant to be sworn, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

The court did not err in amending the indictment. The court is empowered by statute to order the amendment of an indictment with respect to variances from proof relating to matters of time provided that the amendment does not change the theory of the prosecution or otherwise prejudice defendant on the merits (CPL 200.70 [1]; *People v Spann,*56 NY2d 469, 473; *see, People v Owens,*63 NY2d 824, 826). Here, the amendment did not change the theory of the prosecution, which was that defendant committed two specific acts of sodomy within a larger pattern of sexual abuse. In view of the fact that defendant could not have raised and did not raise an alibi defense to those charges, defendant was not prejudiced by the amendment.

The court did not err in allowing the complainant to be sworn. The court’s inquiry was sufficient to establish that the complainant had the capacity to understand and adhere to an oath (CPL 60.20 [2]).

Defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel merely because he failed to make certain evidentiary objections. Moreover, there is a tactical explanation for coun*895sel’s failure to seek to admit the victim’s prior statement. That statement disclosed uncharged crimes committed by defendant and thus its admission would have been prejudicial.

Finally, weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, we cannot conclude that the "trier of fact has failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mulroy, J.—sodomy, first degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 25653.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

*256George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., oí Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and upon conviction, his punishment was -assessed at a fine of $750.00.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Therefore, no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5115 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on resin cement based on calcium 

carbonate and silicone resins. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on resin cement 

based on calcium carbonate and silicone resins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESIN CEMENT BASED ON CALCIUM CAR4 BONATE AND SILICONE RESINS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.62 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 resin cement based on calcium carbonate and silicone res8 ins) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 

9 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5115 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The NSF management official having responsibility for the U.S. National Assessment Synthesis Team (#5219) has determined that renewing through October 31, 2000, is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 USC 1861 et seq. This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.

Authority for this Committee will expire on October 31, 2000. For more information, please contact Karen York, NSF, at (703) 292-4387.

Dated: September 28, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25400  Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit10.2**

 

November 7, 2005

 

 

 

Mr. Robert Sprowls

Golden State Water Company

630 East Foothill Blvd.

San Dimas, California 91773

 

Dear Mr. Sprowls:

 

This letter is to confirm the decision madeby the Golden State Water Company Compensation Committee (the “Committee”)regarding your retirement benefits at its meeting on January 31, 2005.  If you terminate employment with the GoldenState Water Company (the “Company”) prior to becoming vested under the SouthernCalifornia Water Company Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) and/or prior tobecoming eligible for a benefit under the Southern California Water CompanyPension Restoration Plan (the “SERP”), the Company shall nevertheless pay toyou, out of its general assets, a benefit equal to the aggregate benefit thatwould have been payable to you under the Pension Plan and the SERP if you werefully vested under both the Pension Plan and SERP.  This benefit shall be payable in accordancewith the terms of the SERP, including the offset for any benefits payable underthe Pension Plan, and shall be subject to and governed by all of theprovisions, limitations, restrictions, and claims procedures of the SERP.

 

Nothing herein shall be considered aguarantee of employment or entitle you to any benefits other than thosespecifically described above.

 

If this is your understanding, please signand return this letter to me.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/ Floyd E. Wicks                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Floyd E. Wicks                         |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

 

Agreed to by:

 
| /s/ Robert J. Sprowls |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
| Robert J. Sprowls     |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certificate of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

               In connection with the quarterly report of Speizman Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S.Speizman, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
-  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Date:  February 10, 2004

 

|   | /s/*Robert S. Speizman                                                   *Robert S. Speizman    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
JUDGE DVD GUDERRAM 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

EL PASO DIVISION FEB -6 PM 2. Q14 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS, 

Defendant. 

CRIMINAL NO. EP-20-CRGOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DETAIN DEFENDANT 

WITHOUT BOND AND MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 

The United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(e) and (f), files this Motion to Detain Defendant Without Bond and Motion for Continuance, 

and for cause, would respectfully show the following: 

1. The Defendant has been charged by Indictment with a violation of Title 18, United 

States Code, Section 249(a)(2), Hate Crime Resulting in Death; Title 18, United States Code, 

Sections 924(c), (j)(1), Use of a Firearm to Commit Murder During and in Relation to a Crime 

Violence; Title 18, United States Code, Section 249(a)(2), Hate Crime Involving Attempt to Kill; 

and Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(c), Use of a Firearm During and in Relation to a 

Crime of Violence. 

2. There are no conditions or combination of conditions which will reasonably assure 

the safety of the community should the Defendant be released on bond. 

3. There are no conditions or combination of conditions which will reasonably assure 

the appearance of the Defendant at future court settings. 

The Government would further move the Court for a three day continuance of the detention 

hearing from the date of the initial appearance. 

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 4 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Government respectfully prays the Court to hold 

the above-named Defendant without bail pending the final outcome of this case. 

Respectfully submitted, 

JOiYP. BASH 

UNtED STATES ATTORNEY 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

2 

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 4 Filed 02/06/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4942 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4942

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene polymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene polymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE POLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ethylene-Propylene  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymer (CAS No.                                                   31/2015.......
                        9010-79-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3902.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```