alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Stephen E. King, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                      |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | 
|                                                      |  |  | 
|/s/ Stephen E. King                                   |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|Stephen E. King, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Date: November 7, 2007
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Florida Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 26319.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1953.

No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for robbery, with punishment assessed at fifteen years in the penitentiary.

No notice of appeal appears to have been given and entered of record.

The jurisdiction of this court does not attach in the absence of a notice of appeal.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4981 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.4G grade fireworks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.4G grade fireworks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1.4G GRADE FIREWORKS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1.4G grade fireworks (provided for in subheading 

3604.10.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4981 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Production from Less than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Production from Less than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 87     | 91     | 92     | 73     | 88     | 123    | 113    | 116   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 115    | 96     | 118    | 93     | 104    | 79     | 75     | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Mansour Khayyam, Respondent, v George L. Diplacidi et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered December 18, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied defendants’ motion for summary *301judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This is an action for specific performance to compel the conveyance of certain real property. On October 17, 1986, plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of 1975 Amsterdam Avenue. On the same date, a contract for sale of an adjacent building, 1969 Amsterdam Avenue, was entered into by corporate entities controlled by the parties. While the contracts state no contingency, defendants contend that, in fact, the sale was contingent on the conveyance of both. Defendants also contend that plaintiff acted with unclean hands in attempting to "steal” the property by purchasing only 1975 Amsterdam and by causing extensions of the closing deadline by requesting documentation for financing which was not actually sought until one year after the contractual deadline. Plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that there was no attempt to "steal” the one parcel since the contracts were not contingent, and that defendants’ refusal to supply detailed documentation delayed his application for a mortgage commitment.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that specific performance, an action in equity, will not compel an unconscionable result and that plaintiff had acted with unclean hands. The court denied the motion, finding the facts to be contradictory and unclear so that the court could not determine where the equities lay. We agree.

While "specific performance will not be granted where it would cause unreasonable hardship or injustice” *(Concert Radio v GAF Corp.,*108 AD2d 273, 278, *affd*73 NY2d 766), equity will not relieve parties from bargains simply because they are unreasonable or unprofitable (55 NY Jur 2d, Equity, § 76, at 510).

Whether equity will come to the aid of defendants must, in any event, await resolution of the factual issues raised on this record. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 887    | 926    | 825   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,287  | 1,321  | 847    | 896    | 802    | 857    | 803    | 780    | 819    | 867   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 899    | 831    | 859    | 673    | 717    | 782    | 796    | 762    | 782    | 841   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 885    | 898    | 906    | 1,059  | 995    | 986    | 1,057  | 1,052  | 1,000  | 976   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 944    | 778    | 602    | 575    | 667    | 692    | 569    | 611    | 593    | 613   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 555    | 715    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

d0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142637

BRIAN BEARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142637 COA: 290153 Barry CC: 07-000088-NH JAMES HORTON, JR., D.O. and HASTINGS ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5116 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5116

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on zinc silicate phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on zinc silicate phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZINC SILICATE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.67 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to zinc silicate phosphor) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### People v Miguel Figueroa.

Motion to amend remittitur of this court entered on December 28, 1989 *[see,*156 AD2d 322] granted to extent of reciting the following: "Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
#### PETERSON v. STATE.

No. 25552.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 30, 1952.

*131Cofer & Cofer, G. Hume Cofer, John D. Cofer, Critz, Kuykendall, Bauknight & Stevenson, and Richard Critz, all of Austin, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

We granted appellant the right to file a third motion for rehearing upon the allegations of the motion that the count of the indictment upon which the conviction was predicated was fatally defective.

Since the filing of the motion, there has been filed herein a supplemental transcript containing a certified copy of the indictment, which shows that the claimed defect therein did not, in fact, exist and that the indictment was incorrectly copied in the original transcript.

The indictment as it appears 1⁄8 the certified copy is subject to no defect.

Appellant again challenges, with much earnestness, our conclusion that the facts warrant the conviction.

The facts have been examined again in the light of the contentions made, and we remain convinced that the jury’s conclusion of guilt was warranted thereby. It must be remembered that in testing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, it is the province of this court to determine only whether there is. any evidence which, if believed, shows the guilt of the acpused.

By its verdict, the jury found appellant guilty of the offense of passing a forged instrument. In entering judgment upon that verdict, the trial court incorrectly adjudged appellant guilty of the offense of forgery. The judgment is therefore reformed so as to adjudge appellant guilty of the offense of unlawfully passing a forged instrument, and the sentence is reformed to comply with the judgment.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the 'Court
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 116    | 226    | 373   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 250    | 131    | 322    | 167    | 160    | 368    | 372    | 340    | 473    | 431   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 394    | 719    | 718    | 1,000  | 696    | 555    | 802    | 959    | 1,898  | 2,788 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,825  | 1,882  | 2,029  | 2,114  | 1,505  | 2,018  | 1,178  | 3,924  | 3,244  | 1,601 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,973  | 2,509  | 2,137  | 4,110  | 3,461  | 1,740  | 2,774  | 2,900  | 2,712  | 2,756 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,890  | 5,304  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023