alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JESKUS v. STATE.

No. 26925.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 7, 1954.

Charles W- Bennett, Jr., and C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*384MORRISON, Judge,

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 5 years.

Mrs. Owens testified that one afternoon during the first two weeks of June, while she was on vacation, she saw the appellant pass her house several times in a dark blue Ford coupe and that he looked in the direction of her house. The witness stated that shortly thereafter she left her home and was gone approximately an hour, and when she returned her television and radio sets were missing. She stated that Mrs. Stephens, who lived across the street from her, gave her the Texas automobile license number LY-4417.

Mrs. Stephens testified that one day in June she saw the appellant driving slowly up and down the street in a dark blue Ford coupe and finally park in Mrs. Owens’ driveway. She stated that he knocked on the Owens’ door, that he went to the back of the house and then entered the house through the front door. She testified that she saw the appellant come out of the house with something the size of a recording machine, which he put in the back of the Ford, and drive away, and that she had later picked out the appellant in a police lineup.

Mrs. Stephens’ daughter testified that at the instruction of her mother she had taken down the license number on the dark blue Ford coupe and that it was LY-4417.

Officer Warnick testified that he arrested appellant in July in a dark blue Ford coupe for driving while intoxicated.

Officer Kelley testified that he searched appellant’s automobile on a lot at the police station and found concealed therein the Texas license plate number LY-4417.

Appellant did not testify or call any witnesses in his behalf.

Bills of exception Nos. 1 and 2 are predicated upon a variance between the date charged in the indictment and the date proven. The date charged is “on or about July 8, 1953.” The proof showed early in June, 1953.

Appellant relies upon Stephens v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 245, 234 S.W. 540, which is not applicable because in that case there was a variance between the date alleged in the complaint and that in the information.

The general rule has long been established that proof that the offense was committed at such time as that the prosecution would not be barred by the statute of limitations is sufficient. Hampton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 248 S.W.2d 488.

Bills of exception Nos. 3 and 4 relate to the failure of the trial court to charge on circumstantial evidence.

No objections were filed to the charge because of the omission and no such charge was requested.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
(November 14, 1990)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Rafael T. Mendoza for Admission to the Bar.

Per Curiam.

Applicant seeks an order granting his application for admission to the New York State Bar without examination notwithstanding the decision of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District disapproving his application *(see,*CPLR 9404; 22 NYCRR 805.1 [m]).

Applicant is a member of the Philippines Bar in good standing and was formerly a Judge in that country. He currently resides in California.

*659The Committee on Character and Fitness disapproved the application for admission because of a number of complaints filed against applicant in the Philippines regarding his judicial conduct in that country and because of his failure to voluntarily and forthrightly reveal such complaints to the Committee during the application process. Indeed, applicant responded "no” to several questions on the application forms which would call for the revelation of such information. The Committee became aware of the complaints by virtue of a letter submitted by a Philippines attorney to the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) in response to a routine background inquiry the NCBE made regarding applicant. The NCBE character report is a required part of an application for admission without examination (22 NYCRR 520.9 [b] [4]).

Candor and the voluntary revelation of negative information by an applicant are the cornerstones upon which is built the character and fitness investigation of an applicant for admission to the New York State Bar *(see, e.g.,*Judiciary Law § 90 [2]; *Matter of Anonymous,*17 NY2d 674, 675; *Matter of Cohn,*118 AD2d 15, 47, *lv denied*68 NY2d 712; *Matter of Greenblatt,*253 App Div 391; *see generally,*ABA/BNA Lawyer’s Manual on Professional Conduct, Qualifications/Admissions, Duty of Candor, 21:301-21:309). We conclude that the Committee’s careful and thorough investigation of this application for admission has revealed a lack of candor by applicant upon which the Committee could properly find that he does not possess "the character and general fitness requisite for an attorney and counsellor-at-law” (Judiciary Law § 90 [1] [b]; *see, Matter of Weiss,*24 AD2d 981, *revd on other grounds*20 NY2d 696).

We therefore deny applicant’s petition for an order granting his application for admission to practice in New York State notwithstanding the decision of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Third Judicial District disapproving the application.

Application denied and petition dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1


N   O   V   A        R   E   S   O   U   R   C   E ,       I   N   C.
 
 CERTIFIED PETROLEUM  GEOLOGISTS   *REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS*   CERTIFIED PETROLEUM GEOPHYSICISTS
 
 Oil & Gas Exploration  and  Production  *  Certified   SEC   Reserves   Valuations
 
 
 P. O. Box 743324
 Dallas, Texas 75374
 Tel/Fax(972)530-3930
 novapet@tx.rr.com
 
 April 14, 2011
 
 United American Petroleum Corporation
 9600 Great Hills Trail
 Suite 150W
 Austin, Texas 78759
 
 RE: Consent of Technical Report Author
 
 Gentlemen;
 
 
 We hereby consent to the written disclosure of extracts of the technical report titled “Certified Revised SEC Reserves Report and Economic Valuation of Lozano Lease located in Frio County, Texas dated December 31, 2010 (the “technical Report”) within the Annual Report of Form 10-K of United American Petroleum Corp. (the “annual Report’).
 
 
 Nova Resource, Inc.
 
 /s/ Joseph V. Rochefort,
 Joseph V. Rochefort
 President
 
 Dallas, Texas
 April 14, 2011
#### WOODWORTH v. STATE.

No. 25765.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1952.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*103MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information appear regular on their face; nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 2,466  | 2,565  |        |        |        | 1,942  | 1,406  | 1,124  | 1,998 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,878  | 1,502  | 1,855  | 1,841  | 2,477  | 2,731  | 3,445  | 4,229  | 3,561  | 2,841 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,039  | 5,268  | 4,672  | 5,346  | 6,284  | 10,244 | 10,090 | 11,290 | 11,591 | 10,812
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12,317 | 13,321 | 12,886 | 9,024  | 9,293  | 6,806  | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Investment Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (“Form10-K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 
| Date:  May 24, 2010       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/  David Watson         |   |
| David  Watson             |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                    On September 20, 2000, the                     **Federal Register**                     published the Biweekly Notice of Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Notice of Issuance of Amendments. On page 56964, column 2, TXU Electric, Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, the numbers of the amendments issued should be Amendment Nos. 79 and 79.                 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of September 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

John A. Zwolinski, 

Director, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 00-24832 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,542,158
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,864,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,615,120
<PP&E>                                           4,389,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,252,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,978,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,136,013
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           272,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,986,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,978,444
<SALES>                                            666,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,850,242
<CGS>                                              573,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,164,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 185,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    731,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                731,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       731,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .03
        



</TABLE>
June 28, 2012 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

ath Floo~. Room W86-31 0 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Dear Ms. Ley, 

l' l \ 

,: J,_ 'I I 

---- ----

--- - ---- -----

----- - -- --- ---·-

:!()():) llip.lumv .!2 \orth 

fi.o,.hester. 1/,V ;i.)'IU/ 

The Rochester International Airport in Rochester: Minnesota submitted a Small 

Community Air Service Development Grant in response to the Department's request for 

proposals under Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069. The $500,000 Grant request will be 

combin~9 with $200,000 in local non-airport funding from Rochester and used to recruit 

critically needed new air service at Rochester, Minnesota. 

Air service at Rochester is down about one third in the past three years. It is more 

difficult to use the local airport for trips due to cutbacks by both Delta and American. 

Our economy is very dependent on reasonably priced and readily available,aiF service. 

IBM in Rochester is a large research and manufacturing facility. The Mayo Clinic 

headquarters is also located in Rochester. IBM and the Mayo Clinic, as well as the 

many local companies that support them, need effective local air service to serve their 

customers. The Mayo Clinic alone hosts over one million patient and patient-related 

visitors per year,~ and local air service is essential to a positive patient experience. 

It is essential that the decline in Rochester air service be reversed. Our Airport has 

talked to several airlines, and one airline has written a letter of support for our 

application. 

I am the Senior Location Executive for IBM in Rochester and Vice President. On behalf 

of IBM, I urge the Department to award Rochester this grant so we can reverse the 

decline in our local air service. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

··~ / J ,' . /// l . r:->7- . '.1 .. , -· ·,_// 

Walt Ling 

IBM Vice President, Technical Support Services 

Minnesota Senior State Executive 

Rochester Senior Location Executive
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5064 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5064

         To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-HEXYLRESORCINOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-Hexylresorcinol) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 6 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 6 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 2      | 7      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: April 6, 2006



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard A. Schweinhart                                                                            
|Richard A. Schweinhart                                                                                
|Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, the General Partner of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.