alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BEHNE v. STATE.

No. 25086.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1951.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant waived a jury and pleaded not guilty before the court on a charge of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The court found him guilty and assessed his penalty at a fine of fifty dollars.

The appeal is brought forward without a bill of exception or statement of facts. All the proceedings appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4903 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4903

 To suspend temporarily the duty on power electronic boxes and static 
                       converter composite units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

    Mr. Clarke of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on power electronic boxes and static 
                       converter composite units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POWER ELECTRONIC BOXES AND STATIC CONVERTER COMPOSITE UNITS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Power electronics   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          box and static                                                    12/31/2015
                          converter
                          composite units,
                          each capable of
                          performing the
                          functions of an
                          AC inverter and
                          an auxiliary
                          power module,
                          capable of
                          reducing DC
                          voltage from 42 V
                          (supplied by
                          battery) to 12 V
                          output and
                          providing three-
                          phase AC output
                          to motor
                          generator unit,
                          the foregoing
                          certified by the
                          importer for use
                          in hybrid
                          electric motor
                          vehicles
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8504.40.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 665    | 2      | 71     | 386    | 14     | 89     | 27     | 1,238  | 10     | 16    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 711    | 403    | 0      | 11     | 8      | 0      | 0      | 53     | 0      | 274   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 204    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Kloster, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the infant victim sustained serious physical injury *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [10]; § 120.10 [3]; *see also, People v Wright,*105 AD2d 1088).

We reject defendant’s contention that the court, in this nonjury trial, erred by admitting rebuttal evidence of defendant’s prior bad act. The testimony from a former baby-sitter that she observed defendant physically abuse the victim on a prior occasion was probative to negate the credibility of defendant’s claim of an accidental cause for the victim’s injuries and was relevant on the issue of the identity of the guilty

*897party *(see, People v Allweiss,*48 NY2d 40, 47; *People v Sims,*110 AD2d 214, 223, *lv denied*67 NY2d 657). Further, the probative value of this testimony outweighed its possible prejudicial effect *(see, People v Sims, supra,*at 220).

The trial court did not err in admitting photographs of the victim taken shortly after the incident *(see, People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, *cert denied*416 US 905; *People v Ferris,*105 AD2d 1136). We find that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find that it lacks merit. (Appeal from judgment of Lewis County Court, Merrell, J.—assault, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4810 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-less 

automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-less automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SELF CONTAINED, CARAFE-LESS AUTOMATIC 

4 DRIP COFFEEMAKER WITH ELECTRONIC 

5 CLOCK. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.47 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 self contained, carafe-less automatic drip coffeemaker with 

9 electronic clock) is amended by striking the date in the 

10 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4810 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Notes from Meeting with USAPHC

Attended by:

USAPHC: Lisa Strutz, Richard Price, Sandy Toscano

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald, Charlotte Mooney, Lisa Lauer, Jessica Young

Date: November 28, 2012

EPA met with representatives of the US Army Public Health Command’s (USAPHC) Army

Institute of Public Health.

They inquired about the progress of the pharmaceuticals proposed rule. They raised the

following issues that they hope the proposed rule will address:

1. P-listed hazardous waste pharmaceuticals containers

2. Reverse distribution

3. Floor sweepings

4. Off-post transport/consolidation from satellite pharmacies

5. Controlled substances

6. Amnesty Turn-ins/residential take-backs

They discussed their operations pertaining to reverse distribution and said that certain 

pharmaceuticals never get credit: loose pills, partially dispensed liquids and drugs with sole 

manufacturers. 

During the discussion, the Army indicated that their off-post clinics are generally CESQGs.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Standard Commercial Corporation

Certification



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Standard Commercial Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company, as of and for the periods presented.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert E. Harrison                                               
|                     |  |     |  | Robert E. Harrison Chief Executive
Officer                           
|                     |  |    
|Date: August 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert A. Sheets                                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Robert A. Sheets Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4905

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed February 8, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

.

Timothy Randolph , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Att orney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### FREEMAN v. STATE.

No. 26739.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for . the State.

*253• GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Lower 48 States Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 150   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 271    | 536    | 729    | 578    | 591    | 375    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

Action brought on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-50/06)

(2006/C 96/04)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Maria Condou-Durande and Rudi Troosters, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 8(e) of the Netherlands Vreemdelingenwet (Law on Aliens) 2000 provides that an alien will be lawfully resident in the Netherlands as a Community national only on condition that that national is resident on the basis of a rule, including a rule pursuant to the EC Treaty.

Most of the provisions of the Vreemdelingenwet 2000 are otherwise applicable in full to 'aliens' in general, that term being construed, in accordance with Article 1(m) of the Law, as also covering nationals of a Member State of the EU. As such, no reference is made in the Vreemdelingenwet to Directive 64/221/EEC and the principles contained in that directive are not incorporated in the text of the Law. A fortiori, the obligations resulting from Directive 64/221/EEC have not been transposed in a clear and unambiguous manner in that legislation.

----

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1963-1964, p. 117.

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4507 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cloquintocet-mexyl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cloquintocetmexyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLOQUINTOCET-MEXYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.57 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cloquintocet-mexyl) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4507 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GREGSON v. SALLEE et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 13, 1953.

George T. Gess, Jr., Lexington, for appellant.

Frank C. Henry, Lexington, for appellee.

*17COMBS, Justice.

The appellant was served by constructive service in a suit to sell a house and lot in Lexington in which he owned an undivided one-fifth interest. The property was sold and the' report of sale was confirmed. Some nine months later appellant filed motion for a new trial under authority of Civil Code of Practice, section 414, which provides in part:

> “A defendant against whom a judgment may have been rendered upon constructive service of a summons, * * * may, at any time within five years after the rendition of, the judgment, move to have the action retried”.

This appeal is from an order overruling a motion for retrial of the case.

The'only ground on which appellant relies for a new trial is that the judgment directing sale of the property contained an incorrect reference to the source of title. The judgment refers to the will of W. C. Gregson as the source of title, when actually only, an undivided one-half interest in the property had passed under the will, the other one-half interest having descended to the same parties from Metta H. Gregson, the deceased wife of W. C. Gregson.. The result was exactly the same. The parties to the suit are the children of W. C. and Metta Gregson, and their father’s will merely devised , his interest in the property to his children in the same proportion it would have descended to them under the law of descent and distribution in the absence of a will.

We gather from appellant’s brief that none of .the children realized until after the report of sale was confirmed that their mother owned any interest in the property, and ■ the real reason for requesting a new trial is to permit one of appellant’s brothers to file claim against the mother’s estate before she is legally divested of title to the property.

We think appellant’s position is untenable. He has completely failed to show how his rights have been prejudiced in any respect, and if the case should be retried the same judgment, with a correction as to the source of title, would have to be re-entered. Appellant’s motion merely requests a new. trial, and refers to section 414 of the Civil Code of Practice. He makes no attempt to state any defense which he could present in the event of a new trial. It was held in Williams v. Taylor, *74*Ky. 375, that a- defendant constructively summoned is entitled to a new trial under section 414 only in the event he presents with his motion for new trial a defense to the action. It is true that is an old case, but it has withstood the test of time and we think it is sound.

In view of what has already been said it is unnecessary to discuss the other questions raised in the briefs.

The judgment is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5069 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on artichokes, prepared or 

preserved by vinegar or acetic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on artichokes, 

prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTICHOKES, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY 

4 VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.90 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 artichokes, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic 

8 acid) is amended by striking the date in the effective pe9 riod column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5069 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS