alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58508-58509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1120]


GRANT OF AUTHORITY FOR SUBZONE STATUS; ASO Corporation (Adhesive 
Bandages); Sarasota County, Florida

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for `` * * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing 
foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Manatee County Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 169, has made application to the Board for authority to 
establish special-purpose subzone status at the adhesive

[[Page 58509]]

bandage facility of Aso Corporation located in Sarasota County, 
Florida, (FTZ Docket 24-98, filed 5-05-98);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (63 FR 26776, 5/14/98 and 65 FR 49536, 8/14/00); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations would be satisfied, and that approval of the 
application would be in the public interest if approval were subject to 
a time limit;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the adhesive bandage facility of Aso Corporation, located in 
Sarasota County, Florida, (Subzone 169A), at the location described in 
the application, for an initial period of four years (of activation), 
subject to extension upon review, and subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of September 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25085 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### *The HONORABLE THOMAS M. REAVL EY, United States Circuit Judge

for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. ___________ No. 95-2205

___________ Eric S. Hart, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the James D. Purkett, * Eastern District of Missouri. Superintendent of the * Farmington Correctional Center, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 10, 1996 Filed: March 12, 1996

___________ Before LOKEN, REAVLEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. *

___________ PER CURIAM.
Missour i inmate Eric Hart appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Hart was convicted of attempted rape and arme d criminal action and sentenced to eight years in prison. The conviction wa s aff irmed on direct appeal. Hart did not petition the state court fo r postconviction relief within the time then presc ribed in Missouri R. Crim. P. 29.15. His later petition to the Missouri Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because he failed to pursue the Rule 29.15 remedy
.

Hart then filed this federal habeas petition, asserting numerou s grounds for relief. He raises one issue on appeal, that

### The HONORABLE CATHERINE D. PERRY, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- the district court erred in denying some claims as procedurally barred by 1 his failure to seek state court postconviction relief under Rule 29.15
. Hart argues that he had cause for this failure because the trial court gav e misleading advice at sentencing as to the Rule 29.15 procedure, and becaus e Rule 29.15 before its recent amendment was a fundamentally unfair procedur e in th at its time constraints left a defendant dependent upon his tria l co unsel for advice regarding the assertion of ineffective assistanc e claims. After pronouncing Hart's sentence, the trial judge explained th e Rule 29.15 procedure and inquired whether Hart was satisfied with his tria l attorne y's assistance. When Hart responded that he was satisfied an d thought counsel had done a good job, the court made a finding on the recor d that there was no pro bable cause to believe Hart had received ineffective assistance. See Missouri Crim. Rule 29.07; Shigemura v. Groose , 45 F.3d 250, 253 n.3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 157 (1995). While the court made a relatively minor mistake in explaining the Rule 29.15 tim e limits to Hart, nothing in the record suggests that Hart contemplate d pursuing any remedy o ther than a direct appeal during the period in which a t imely Rule 29.15 petition could have been filed. We conclude tha t Hart's colloquy with the trial court at sentencing establishes that h e cannot show cause excusing his procedural default. Accordingly, we need not reach the other grounds for affirmance urged by appellee. The judgmen t of the district court is affirmed.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,615 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 6,728  | 7,068  | 7,221  | 7,901  | 7,643  | 7,944  | 8,165  | 8,147  | 8,238  | 7,769 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 7,586  | 7,464  | 7,451  | 7,222  | 7,170  | 7,399  | 7,823  | 7,973  | 7,524  | 7,906 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8,345  | 7,993  | 7,994  | 7,459  | 7,928  | 8,165  | 8,472  | 9,143  | 9,275  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### DE LUNA v. STATE.

No. 24774.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 24, 1950.

No appearance, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State,

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged' by indictment with assault with intent to murder without malice on one Tomas .Hernandez. The jury found, him guilty of the .offense of aggravated assault, and assessed his pun■ishment at tvyo years in jail and a fine of $1,000.

The State’s evidence shows an, unjustified assault by shooting with a pistol. Three shots were fired, all of which struck Hernandez. The injuries resulting therefrom appear to be serious bodily injuries.

There are no bills of exception, and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain.the conviction, and the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 530    | 514    | 652   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 636    | 648    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,125  | 5,414  | 5,802  | 5,140  | 4,830  | 4,868  | 5,033  | 4,968  | 4,604  | 4,287 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,149  | 3,915  | 3,884  | 4,301  | 4,120  | 3,965  | 3,911  | 3,994  | 3,290  | 2,871 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,629  | 2,475  | 2,228  | 1,597  | 2,036  | 2,182  | 1,791  | 1,510  | 1,262  | 1,387 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,493  | 1,295  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5014 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5014

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4 Ethoxy 1,1,1 trifluoro 3 butene-2-
                                  one.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 4 Ethoxy 1,1,1 trifluoro 3 butene-2-
                                  one.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4 ETHOXY 1,1,1 TRIFLUORO 3 BUTENE-2-ONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4 Ethoxy 1,1,1      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          trifluoro 3                                                       12/31/2015
                          butene-2-one (CAS
                          No. 59938-06-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2914.69.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -1     | 153    | -182  
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 297    | -191   | 23     | 205    | -106   | -26    | -32    | 35     | -124   | 55    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 240    | 95     | 94     | 155    | 327    | 581    | 177    | 105    | 12    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 217    | 653    | 82     | 65     | -97    | 1      | 112    | -45    | -48    | -279  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 243    | 8      | -104   | -62    | -47    | -286   | 413    | 255    | 171    | -17   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -116   | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, William E. Alvarez, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Datedthis 6th day of March, 2006.         By: /s/ William E. Alvarez, Jr.       William E. Alvarez, Jr.,      Chief Financial Officer