alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5058 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5058

          To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Violet 1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Violet 1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Violet 1) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|U.S. Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|U.S. Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 393   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 471    | 541    | 590    | 756    | 713    | 545    | 427    | 487    | 401    | 226   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 224    | 1,079  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### RANKIN, County Judge, et al. v. CAYLOR.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 13, 1953.

W. C. Dabney, Monticello, for appellants.

. J. M. Kennedy, Monticello, W. Russell Jones, Somerset, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Silas Caylor, holding a judgment against Wayne County in the amount of $670, brought a mandamus proceeding seeking to compel the fiscal court of the county to provide in its tax levy and budget for the payment of his judgment. In March 1952, judgment was entered in the mandamus proceeding directing the fiscal court to provide for the payment of the judgment by including one-half of the amount due in its 1952-1953 budget, ■ and the other. one-half in its 1953-1954 budget. However, the judgment recited that the claim of Caylor was inferior and subject to the necessary governmental expenses of the county. The fiscal court has appealed.

There is little 'merit in the contentions of the appellant, and wé will dispose of them summarily, as follows:

1. It was not necessary for Caylor to allege in his petition, in the mandamus proceeding, that the county 'had funds on hand with which to pay his judgment, or that the county was not levying the maximum tax rate permitted by the Constitution. Inability to pay was a matter of defense to be asserted by the fiscal court.

2. The court did not err in failing to hear proof, because the record shows that no proof was offered.

3. The judgment conformed with the decision in Town of Mt. Vernon v. General Electric Supply Co., 289 Ky. 355, 158 S.W.2d 649, in directing that Caylor’s claim be subordinated to necessary governmental expenses'. 'The answer of the fiscal court, listing the annual expenses of the county, included several items clearly of a nongovernmental character, particularly the items of “Farm Bureau Salary,” “Home Demonstrator’s Salary,” and “Health Department’s Salary,” totalling $3,000, the elimination of which would leave ample funds; with - which' to pay Caylor’s claim. We think it would have been proper for the court to have adjudged that these specific nongovernmental expenses, listed in- the answer, were, to be subordinated to Caylor’s claim, but since the ’appellee- does not complain- of . this omission there is no occasion-for us to *42direct that the judgment he modified in that respect. It will be the duty of the fiscal court in budgeting appellee’s claim to give it precedence over any items of nongovernmental expense which it may include in its budget, including those expenses which we have indicated above.

4. The mere fact'that nongovernmental expenses of a particular character have been paid for a long period of years does not entitle that character of expenses to priority in the future over a valid judgment debt against the county.

The judgment is' affirmed.
#### BLAND v. STATE.

No. 24297.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bowie County for murder with malice and the punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. The proceedings appear regular in every respect. Nothing is presented for review. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Texas State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Texas State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 214    | 243    |        |        |        | 55     | 72     | 65     | 60    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 68     | 75     | 95     | 37     | 89     | 36     | 58     | 141    | 170   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 99     | 16     | 41     | 37     | 165    | 35     | 16     | 14     | 23     | 29    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 75     | 16     | 9      | 18     | 8      | 13     | 0      | 1      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 11     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Nu-Star Petroleum, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Defendant-*332Respondent, and E.L.C.M. of F., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. William Murray et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered on or about May 2, 1990, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Martin Evans, J., with costs and disbursements. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of
NewLead Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonis Bertsos, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



Date: May 9, 2014



|/s/ Antonis Bertsos     | 
|----------------------- | 
|Antonis Bertsos         | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 



|* | This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of NewLead Holdings Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of Encore Credit Receivables Trust 2005-1, Series
             2005-1

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee and Option One Mortgage Company.


             Date: March 27, 2006


                                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Steve Bailey
                                                        Senior Managing Director
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ David A. KindlickName: David A. KindlickTitle: Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2010
CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with this Annual Report of Aries Maritime Transport Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ioannis Makris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
June 26, 2009











/s/ _ Ioannis
Makris_____________


Ioannis
Makris


Chief
Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5067 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulfonic 

acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-phenyl-1Hbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-PHENYL-1H-BENZIMIDAZOLE-5-SULFONIC 

4 ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid, (CAS 

No. 27503–81–7) (provided for in subheading 

2933.99.75) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5067 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DENNIS R. HABER, P.A. 

Providing independent General Counsel services to the Business & Aviation Community 

Of Counsel: 

Jill Sharon White, Esq. 5 

Jili't/.la-.vv eiTniami.com 

Michael Bernstein, Esq. 

Michaeiti'i3v.T.-errn!amL.'.-oi":i 

Enrique J. Fernandez. Esq. : 

Eni-:ouet;ETF?A.com 

proj prT-'-oonoTATinM 

Membt-r 

Mvrvitej: 

June 15,2010 

TRANSMITTED VIA EMAIL AND USPS 

David.benkin@dot.gov 

The Honorble Isaac D. Benkin, 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dennis R Haber, Esq. i 

Demlis'iv!la^^A^ermiami•Com 

Dynili5'fl.a•v'8'a^^^\ er.com 

1 Admitted to FloridiL Washington. D.C, and New York 

2 Admitted to Florida, New Jcrse>\ and New York 

3 Admitted in Florida 

RECEiyeQ 

!^^^J2 1 2010 

HEARING DOCKE T 

Re: FAA v. Cloud Dancer Aviation 

FAA Docket No: CPlOSOOOOl 

DMS No. FAA - 2010-0192 

-•,.-! 

: • • • 

••.L. i 

• , . ;•;' . 

-:.: 

1 ^'--

j . .'v > ' 1 

r'ruh 

.CP,b; 

••.f.:-.i; 

•uhl i 

i'),-l 

'.<!. 

! " i 

" • 1 • • 

c -, , 

' • 

s 

i 

i U : 

t \v-

• ' 

CI 

6.. 

:i 

•|..i : 

-

• ' -

i 

^ 

" 

•-• • 

.r-.'i 

. \ j 

Dear Judge Benkin; 

With respect to the above referenced matter, I am in receipt of the Administrative 

Law Judge's Prehearing Order Establishing Procedures and have reviewed same. 

I note that a hearing has been scheduled in Miami, Florida for August 17, 2010. 

However, I am scheduled to be out of town and due back on August 23^*^, 2010. 

Additionally, the weeks of August 23^'* and August 30^*" I have a trial period that is 

scheduled in Broward County. Therefore, I would appreciate your consideration and 

pleaise accept this letter as my request to reschedule the hearing until after the Labor 

Day weekend. 

Thank you for your kind consideration and should you have any questions, please feel 

free to contact my office. 

Sincerely, 

Pemiis R. Haber, Esq. 

DRlLad 

Cc: Michelle Harper, Esq. 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Main Office; 8925 SW 148 Street, Suite 200 • Miami, FL 33176 • Phone; 305-256-3002 • Fax; 305-256-3004 

130 Main Street • Nyack, New York 10960 • Phone:845-348-4747
REGISTRATION

83222-34
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4842 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

manufacturing equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain manufacturing equipment) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4842 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS