alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Source: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2008inventory.html

Tier 1 Summaries - Criteria Air Pollutants only by 13 majors tiers

State/County - County slected

Geographic Aggregation

Region 3 - District Of Columbia

Pollutant: CAP - Volatile Organic Compounds

Tier 1 category - all selected.

Downloaded: April 9, 2012.
fips stfips ctyfips state_abbr county_nameTIER1 TIER1NAMEpollutant_code description

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 1 FUEL COMB. ELEC. UTIL. VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 2 FUEL COMB. INDUSTRIAL VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 3 FUEL COMB. OTHER VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 6 PETROLEUM & RELATED INDUSTRIES VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 7 OTHER INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 8 SOLVENT UTILIZATION VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia 9 STORAGE & TRANSPORT VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia10 WASTE DISPOSAL & RECYCLING VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia11 HIGHWAY VEHICLES VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia12 OFF-HIGHWAY VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

11001 11 1 DC District of Columbia14 MISCELLANEOUS VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
emissions

0.457782

9.292781

907.396

1.239779

21.4

4355.632

476.2047

45.511

4041.348

1490.935

13.3
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                         
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|New York Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4751 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl 

sulfide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-HYDROXYETHYL-N-OCTYL SULFIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide (CAS No. 3547–33–9) 

(provided for in subheading 2930.90.91) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4751 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5015 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethalfluralin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethalfluralin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHALFLURALIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.30.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ethalfluralin) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| /s/      Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.    |   | /s/      Cynthia B. Bezik                                          |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                           |   | Wilbur      L. Ross, Jr.                                           |      | Name: |   | Cynthia      B. Bezik |
| Title:                          |   | Non-Executive      Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director |      | Title: |   | Director |
|                            |   |
| /s/      Maurice E. Carino, Jr. |   | /s/      William J. Catacosinos                                    |
| Name:                           |   | Maurice      E. Carino, Jr.                                        |      | Name: |   | William      J. Catacosinos |
| Title:                          |   | Director                                                           |      | Title: |   | Director |
|                            |   |
| /s/      Stanley N. Gaines      |   | /s/      Bennett K. Hatfield                                       |
| Name:                           |   | Stanley      N. Gaines                                             |      | Name: |   | Bennett      K. Hatfield |
| Title:                          |   | Director                                                           |      | Title: |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                            |   |                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| /s/      Samuel A. Mitchell     |   | /s/      Wendy L. Teramoto                                         |
| Name:                           |   | Samuel      A. Mitchell                                            |   | Name: |   | Wendy      L. Teramoto |
| Title:                          |   | Director                                                           |   | Title: |   | Director |
|                            |   |                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| /s/      Bradley W. Harris      |   |                                                               |   |   |
| Name:                           |   | Bradley      W. Harris                                             |   |   |   |   |
| Title:                          |   | Senior      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  |   |   |   |   |
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD : : : : : : : No. 693 SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW** , this 26 th day of February, 2016, The Honorable Elizabeth S. Beckley, Cumberland County, is hereby appointed a member of the Judicial Conduct Board for a term of four years commencing March 14, 2016. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randolph Coleman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered May 19, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that reversal is required because the prosecutor was permitted to ask leading questions of the complainant is without merit. Although the prosecutor began to ask the complainant a question which was arguably leading in nature *(see,*Fisch, New York Evidence § 331 [Lond *3502d ed]), defense counsel’s objection interrupted that question and prevented any answer thereto, and the question which was ultimately answered was not leading. We find that the prosecutor’s aborted leading question did not prejudice the defendant.

The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.01**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      Craven, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/Richard
                CravenChief
                Executive OfficerApril
                22, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BROWN v. STATE.

No. 23725.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1947.

*224No appearance foi* appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.,

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted for the offense of possessing equipment and material designed for and capable of use for, and used in the manufacture of whisky in a dry area. A fine of $300 was assessed.

The record before us contains no notice of appeal and, therefore, this court has no jurisdiction. The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4815 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4815

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sandwich toaster grills.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sandwich toaster grills.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SANDWICH TOASTER GRILLS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sandwich toaster grills) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### William Henry THOMPSON v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27144.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No appearance for appellant.

Ewing Werlein, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 5 years.

*114The record is before us without a statement of facts; ¡or bills of exception.

All the proceeding's appearing regular and nothing being presented .for. our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 5,772  | 191    | 32     | 0      | 339    | 2,566  | 309    | 1,514  | 271   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 356    | 89     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CALIFORNIA

P A

C I F I C

O C E A N

Sacramento -

San Joaquin

Delta

Avalon Bay

Dana Point

Newport Bay

-2

January 05, 2012 WTR0901723.1

Huntington Harbor

Oceanside

Harbor

Channel Island

Harbor

Mission Bay

San Diego

Bay

California No Discharge Zones

Huntington Harbor

Newport Bay

Oceanside

Harbor

Dana Point

Richardson

Bay

NDZ San Francisco Bay

San

Francisco

Mission Bay NDZ

San Diego Bay

NDZ

Channel

Islands NMS

0 12.5 25 50 75 100

Miles

Source: NDZ - EPA Region 9 GIS Center, September 2006

No Discharge Zone For Large Passenger

& Oceangoing Vessels (Final 2012)

Existing No Discharge Zones

For All Vessels (Final 1976 - 1987)

EPA

Region 9 GIS Center

Farallon

Islands
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 142    | 118    | 282    | 25    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 110    | 181    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 4.05(e)

                             FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 INTERLAND, INC.
                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         THIS AMENDMENT is made as of the ______ day of June, 2000, by
Interland, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Company");



                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - --

         WHEREAS, the Company established the Interland, Inc. Stock Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") effective July 1, 1999 and approved by its shareholders August
26, 1999; and

         WHEREAS, Article 13 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the
Company to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved a stock split of the
Company's Common Stock on the effective date of the Company's proposed initial
public offering; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the
Plan to reflect the effect of such stock split.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, and
other good and valuable consideration, the Plan is amended as follows:

1.       SECTION 4.1 is hereby amended by deleting in the first sentence the
         number "7,000,000" and replacing it with "seven million five hundred
         sixty thousand (7,560,000)".

2.       This Fourth Amendment shall be effective as of the effective date of
         the Company's proposed initial public offering and immediately
         following the Company's stock split on such date. Except as hereby
         amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned does hereby execute this Fourth Amendment to
the Plan as of the date first above written.

                                            INTERLAND, INC.

                                            By:
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                  Kenneth Gavranovic, President
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, James Sikora, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tao Minerals Ltd. for
      the year ended January 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tao Minerals Ltd.                                                              

Dated: June 27, 2011

| | /s/
      James Sikora                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | James Sikora                                             
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial
| | Officer and Director                                     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial  
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                
| | Tao Minerals Ltd.                                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tao Minerals
Ltd. and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---