alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable gas grills. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable gas 

grills. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORTABLE GAS GRILLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Portable gas grills with an 

infrared cooking system 

and 320 sq. in. of grilling 

surface (provided for in 

subheading 7321.11.10) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4653 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eric Dewayne Burns Sr.; * From the 35 0 th District Cour t

Eric Dewayne Burns Jr.; of Taylor County,

and Vennetta Burns, Trial Court No. 13224

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 24

- 00 100

- C V * June 13, 2024

Debra Lynn Lowry and Liberty * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

County Mutual Insurance Company, (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes tha t the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-2244

Filed November 6, 2019

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF AMIT GUPTA

AND MANIKA BANSAL

Upon the Petition of

AMIT GUPTA,

Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

And Concerning

MANIKA BANSAL,

Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Andrew Chappell, 

Judge.

Former spouses appeal and cross-appeal a decree of dissolution of 

marriage. AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS. 

Amit Gupta, Los Angeles, California, pro se appellant.

Manika Bansal, New York, New York, pro se appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J., Mullins, J., and Scott, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019).
2

SCOTT, Senior Judge.

Former spouses appeal and cross-appeal a decree of dissolution of 

marriage. The former husband, Amit Gupta, argues the court erred in not setting 

aside his premarital assets as separate property, not considering the tax 

consequences to each party in determining the property distribution, and not 

granting his reservation of tort claims. The former wife, Manika Bansal, argues the 

court erred in its division of the parties’ personal property as well as its valuation 

of specific assets, not reimbursing her with funds allegedly dissipated by Gupta, 

declining to award her spousal support, and declining to award her attorney fees. 

Both parties request an award of appellate attorney fees.

We have conducted a de novo review of this equitable proceeding. Iowa R. 

App. 6.907; In re Marriage of Larsen, 912 N.W.2d 444, 448 (Iowa 2018). While 

not bound by the district court’s factual findings and credibility assessments, Iowa 

R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g); In re Marriage of Fennelly, 737 N.W.2d 97, 100 (Iowa 

2007), we have accorded them “great weight,” as “the trial court is in a far better 

position to weigh the credibility of witnesses than the appellate court.” Albert v. 

Conger, 886 N.W.2d 877, 880 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). 

We agree with the district court’s characterizations of the parties’ “scorchedearth” tactics in this litigation, which has been nothing short of “a race to the 

bottom.” Upon our de novo review and consideration of the issues presented, we 

are unable to say the district court’s rulings amount to a failure to do equity; we 

therefore do not disturb them. See In re Marriage of McDermott, 827 N.W.2d 671, 

676 (Iowa 2013). The issues presented herein involve only the application of wellsettled rules of law, the evidence is sufficient to support the district court’s factual 
3

findings, disposition on appeal is controlled by prior published appellate opinions, 

we approve the reasons for and conclusions in the district court’s written rulings, 

and a full opinion would not augment or clarify existing case law. We put this 

acrimonious matter to bed by affirming without further opinion pursuant to Iowa 

Court Rule 21.26(1)(a) through (e). The parties’ requests for appellate attorney 

fees are denied. Costs on appeal shall be equally assessed between the parties. 

AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-108522-00] 
          - RIN 1545-AY25 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Monday, August 7, 2000 (65 FR 48198) relating to the recognition of gain on certain transfers to certain foreign trusts and estates.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen A. Rennie Quarrie at (202) 622-3880 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of this correction is under section 684 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking contains errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-108522-00), that was the subject of FR Doc. 00-19896, is corrected as follows: 

§ 1.684-3 

                        On page 48202, column 1, § 1.684-3(f), the first line of                         *Example 1,*                        the language “Example 1. Transfer to owner trust. In” is corrected to read “Example 1. Transfer to grantor trust. In”.                     

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and Strategic Planning). 

[FR Doc. 00-25290 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, John S. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. (the“Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

 

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificationis attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

 

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

Dated: March 28, 2003 

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. and will be retained by Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

RYAN DENTON, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00085-KC

§

CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, §

§

Defendant. §

§

§

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

It is hereby ORDERED the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED.

SIGNED this 27th day of July, 2021.

KATHLEEN CARDONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-00085-KC Document 31 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

vs.

Edgar Martinez-Cruz

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CR-93-LY

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to the District Court pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The District Court referred this case to the United States Magistrate 

Judge for the taking of the defendant’s felony guilty plea and for his allocution pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

On March 18, 2020, the defendant and counsel appeared before the Magistrate Judge. The 

undersigned addressed the defendant personally in open court, informed him of the admonishments 

under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and determined that he understood 

those admonishments. The defendant pled guilty to one count of Illegal Re-entry into the United 

States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The Magistrate Judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, with the advice of his attorney, consented to enter this guilty plea before 

the Magistrate Judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the District Judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charge against him and possible 

penalties;

3. The defendant understands his constitutional and statutory rights, understands that his

constitutional and statutory rights can be waived, and understands the meaning and 

effect of the waiver of his constitutional and statutory rights;
4. The defendant’s plea was made freely and voluntarily;

5. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; and

6. There is a factual basis for this plea. 

RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court accept the defendant’s guilty 

plea and, after reviewing the presentence investigation report, enter a Final Judgment of guilt 

against him.

WARNING

The parties may file objections to this Report and Recommendation. A party filing objections 

must specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which objections are being made. 

The District Court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections. See Battle v. 

United States Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987). A party’s failure to file written 

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained within this Report within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report shall bar that party from de novo 

review by the District Court of the proposed findings and recommendations and, except on grounds 

of plain error, shall bar the party from appellate review of proposed factual findings and legal 

conclusions accepted by the District Court to which no objections were filed. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53, 106 S. Ct. 466, 472-74 (1985); Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

SIGNED on March 18, 2020.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 542   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 757    | 1,665  | 12     | 170    | 1,230  | 0      | 772    | 8,080  | 4,255  | 431   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,839  | 3,537  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000092195
<NAME> SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      725,338
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,918
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         141,541
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,374
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,171
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            246,335
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 324,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,282
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           169,782
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             131,706
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   53,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 220,108
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  919,171
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      100,685
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             7,330
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      76,208
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      83,538
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         17,147
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  83
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  17,230
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,723
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,507
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        270
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   12,237
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         8,096
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,057
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          43,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12
              BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.
          Computation Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                    (Dollars In Millions)



                                             
                                             For the Three
                                              Months Ended
                                               March 31,
                                                  1997
1. Earnings                                  
                                             
   (a) Income from continuing operations      $   1,152
before deductions for taxes and interest
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    14
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $   1,166
                                             
2. Fixed Charges                             
                                             
   (a) Interest                               $     136
                                             
   (b) Portion of rental expense             
representative of interest factor                    14
                                             
     TOTAL                                    $     150
                                             
   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                           7.8
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | -1     | 3      | 14     | -3     | 67     | 8      | -66    | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 451    | 545    | 468   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 508    | 530    | 551    | 554    | 613    | 766    | 841    | 909    | 923    | 992   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,016  | 1,155  | 1,084  | 1,003  | 969    | 1,044  | 983    | 1,364  | 1,222  | 1,435 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,760  | 1,860  | 1,907  | 1,889  | 1,880  | 2,151  | 2,227  | 2,469  | 2,714  | 2,782 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,613  | 2,006  | 1,408  | 1,663  | 1,611  | 1,362  | 1,123  | 1,136  | 1,324  | 1,275 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,158  | 1,256  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023