**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**WASHINGTON,
      D.C. 20549**




**FORM
      10-KSB**




(Mark
      One)


**ý** **ANNUAL
      REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
      1934.**




**** **For
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006**




**OR**




**o** **TRANSITION
      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934.**




**For
      the transition period
      from __________ to __________**







**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


(fka:
      HomAssist Corp)




(Exact
      Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)




**Nevada**
            
            **333-124405**
            
            **98-0434357**(State
                or Other Jurisdiction of
            
            (Commission
            
            (IRS
                EmployerIncorporation)
            
            File
                Number)
            
            Identification
                No.)






**3240
      El Camino Real, Suite 230, Irvine, CA 92602**


(Address
      of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)




**(714)
      824-3000**


Registrant’s
      Telephone Number




Securities
      registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE


Securities
      registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: NONE





Check
      whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
      or
      15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
      that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
      to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes 
      [  ] No





Check
      if
      there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
      Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
      contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
      information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
      or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ X]





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
      12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ]  No
      [ X]





Net
      revenues for its most recent fiscal year:   $nil





Aggregate
      market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by
      reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average
      bid
      and asked price of such common equity, as of March 26, 2007:    $
      26,138,000





Number
      of
      common voting shares outstanding as of March 26, 2007: 52,833,385




Transitional
      Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):   Yes [  ]
 No [ X]





TABLE
      OF CONTENTS




PagePART
                IItem
                1.  Description of Business
            2Item
                2.  Description of Property
            5Item
                3.  Legal Proceedings
            5Item
                4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
            5PART
                IIItem
                5.  Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder
                Matters
            6Item
                6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
                Operation
            8Item
                7.  Financial Statements
            16Item
                8.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
                Financial Disclosure
            16Item
                8a.  Controls and Procedures
            16Item
                8b.  Other Information
            17PART
                IIIItem
                9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons and
                Corporate Governance; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange
                Act
            18Item
                10. Executive Compensation
            19Item
                11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
                and
                Related Stockholder Matters
            19Item
                12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
                Independence
            23Item
                13. Exhibits
            23Item
                14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
            24Signatures
            24




1




**CAUTIONARY
      NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS**




**This
      report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 27A of the Securities Act.
      Any
      statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact
      may be forward-looking statements. When we use the words “anticipates,” “plans,”
“expects,” “believes,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will” and similar expressions,
      we are identifying forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
      involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause our actual results, performance
      or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied
      by
      forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, our need to
      raise additional financing, risks related to the development of our business,
      our history of losses; the historical volatility of our stock prices; general
      market conditions; and other factors that may affect our
      business.**




**Except
      as may be required by applicable law, we do not undertake or intend to update
      or
      revise our forward-looking statements, and we assume no obligation to update
      any
      forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as
      a
      result of new information or future events or developments. You should not
      assume that our silence over time means that actual events are bearing out
      as
      expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. You should carefully
      review and consider the various disclosures we make in this report and our
      other
      reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
      that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks, uncertainties and other
      factors that may affect our business.**




**For
      further information about these and other risks, uncertainties and factors,
      please review the disclosure included in this report under the caption
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation—Risk
      Factors.”**




**ITEM
      1.     Description Of Business.**





DigitalPost
      Interactive, Inc. was incorporated on July 15, 2004, in the State of Nevada.
       The Company's principal executive offices are located at #2340 El Camino
      Real, Suite #230, Irvine, CA 92602. Our telephone number is (714) 824-3000.
      We
      maintain Internet websites at www.DigitalPostInteractive.com and www.TheFamilyPost.com . 
      These websites, and the information contained therein, are not a part of this
      current report.





**The
      Merger**




Prior
      to
      January 25, 2007, we were known as HomAssist Corporation, a Nevada corporation
      (“HomAssist”).  On January 30, 2007, we acquired The Family Post, Inc., a
      privately held California corporation (“Old TFP”), pursuant to an agreement and
      plan of merger, dated as of January 16, 2007, as amended (the “Merger
      Agreement”), by and among us, Old TFP and our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger
      Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub and Old TFP, with the Merger Sub
      being the surviving corporation as our wholly-owned subsidiary (the
“Merger”).  Immediately following the Merger, we changed our name to
      DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (“DPI” or the “Company”), the Merger Sub changed
      its name to The Family Post, Inc .
      (“New
      TFP”), and we began operating New TFPs business of Internet content
      sharing.




Effective
      upon the closing of the Merger, the directors elected at the special meeting,
      who comprise all of the then current HomAssist directors, resigned and the
      sole
      director of Old TFP became the new sole director of DPI.




Prior
      to
      the Merger, HomAssist had 15,600,000 shares of common stock issued and
      outstanding. As part of the Merger, the Company issued 37,233,385 shares of
      our
      common stock to the former stockholders of Old TFP in exchange for all of the
      issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Old TFP (16,478,175
      shares).  As part of the Merger, HomAssist also adopted the existing stock
      option agreements of Old TFP (“Old TFP Option Agreements”) outstanding under
      which options to purchase 7,724,850 shares of common stock of Old TFP
      outstanding prior to the Merger were converted into options to purchase
      17,426,615 shares of common stock of DPI.




Following
      the Merger, there were 52,833,385 shares of DPI common stock outstanding, of
      which the pre-Merger stockholders of HomAssist owned approximately 29.6% and
      the
      pre-Merger stockholders of Old TFP owned approximately 70.4%.  As a result,
      Old TFP has been treated as the acquiring company for accounting purposes. 
The Merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with
      generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or
      “U.S. GAAP.”  Reported results of operations of the combined group issued
      after completion of the transaction will reflect Old TFP’s
      operations.




On
      January 25, 2007, the Company changed it’s year end from January 31 st to
      December 31 st.


2


**Post
      Acquisition Reporting: Rule 13a-1:**





The
      Merger, discussed above, is effective January 30, 2007, subsequent to our most
      recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. As a result, the business of
      HomAssist no longer exists as of the date of this report. To prevent a gap
      in
      financial reporting, in accordance with the SEC Rule 13a-1, we are required
      to
      report all information normally required in a Form 10-KSB related soley to
      the
      business of HomAssist as of December 31, 2006 and for the fiscal year then
      ended. Unless otherwise indicated, all the information furnished in this report
      refers soley to the business and activities of HomAssist prior to the
      Merger.





Unless
      otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,”
“we,” “us,” and “our” refer to DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (formerly known as
      HomAssist Corporation), prior to giving effect to the Merger. Unless otherwise
      indicated or the context otherwise requires, the term “our business” refers to
      home assist business of HomAssist.




For
      information regarding the ongoing business of DPI post Merger, we advise and
      refer the reader to Form 8-K, dated January 30, 2007 and any related amendments
      filed thereafter.




**Business
      Development**





We
      were a
      development stage company.  We have not had any revenues or operations and
      we have few assets.  Since incorporation, we have not made any significant
      purchases or sale of assets, nor have we been involved in any mergers,
      acquisitions or consolidations other than the Merger noted above.  We have
      never declared bankruptcy, been in receivership, or been involved in any legal
      action or proceedings.





Our
      initial operations with respect to our business plan commenced subsequent to
      our
      January 2006 fiscal year, concurrent with the completion of our public offering
      on or about February 2, 2006.





Prior
      to
      the offering, our principal activities consisted only of initial organizational
      activities and the issuance of common shares to our original affiliate
      shareholders. On February 2, 2006 our registration statement on Form SB-2 was
      declared effective, enabling a registered offering of a maximum of 15,600,000
      common shares at a price of $0.0038 per share. On March 31, 2006, we accepted
      subscriptions for 15,600,000 shares from 40 investors, raising a total of
      $60,000.





We
      were
      in the process of establishing ourselves as an educational service provider
      for
      non-professional caregivers, to aid them in the proper methods and mechanics
      of
      home care for the disabled and/or elderly.  We believed there was a market
      for assisted living as a viable alternative to nursing homes and hospitals,
      which are either facing closures and downsizing, or significantly increasing
      costs. We believed the need for such an alternative will help family and friends
      cope and provide the long term care needs for their loved ones. Our intention
      was that the education and tools that we provide to the caregiver will result
      in
      an enhanced quality of life for those in need of assistance.





**Principal
      Products and Services**





Our
      plan
      was to market private, individual and group classes that will give prospective
      non-professional caregivers the ability to care for an elderly or an
      intellectually or physically challenged person(s). This was intended to be
      independent of whether it be in the caregiver’s home or the residence of the one
      receiving care.  The classes were intended to give instruction on how to
      provide comfort and care to the disabled; pain management and symptoms;
      effective communication skills, and how to obtain practical and emotional
      support from available circles within the community. Care giving and practical
      skills were to be taught, including care for the disabled within a home setting,
      aspects of physical care and nutrition, and how to move a person safely.
 We planned to offer tutoring in group and individual settings.  At
      the time, we expected that our services would include presentation of community
      seminars to various church groups, service groups and clubs as well as being
      open to the community at large.  We would have leased the facility for
      these classes.




Seminars
      and teaching in a classroom setting would have been used to cover basic homecare
      issues such as preparing for the in home care of a loved one, the need for
      support services and available community resources.  At these sessions we
      would have also introduced our availability for private, at home, tutorials
      tailored for the individual’s needs.  Our one on one instruction conducted
      in the home of a person requiring care would have been designed around the
      needs
      of the person requiring care and his or her caregiver. Therefore what we would
      have taught would have needed to be flexible and individualized; a set lesson
      plan was not feasible under these circumstances. We would have also provided
      support and follow-up services to our clients.


3


Another
      aspect of our proposed instructional program included exercise methods, such
      as
      range of motion for those who can no longer walk or move independently.
 Our instruction curriculum would have also covered communication skills
      with the disabled or elderly.  We would have taught the importance of
      understanding the effect of disease or age on communication.  There would
      have been instruction on techniques, creativity, and patience when communicating
      with the one for which they are caring.





We
      would
      have stressed the importance of developing a good working relationship with
      doctors, nurses and those involved in the treatment/s of the loved one.  We
      would not have offered any medical advice or diagnosis. **** The
      need
      for the caregivers understanding and the correct handling of medications would
      have been stressed.





**The
      Market**





Our
      market focus was on the non-professional caregivers, such as family or friends
      that provide home care to a loved one.  Our target area was to be the major
      urban centers in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, Canada.





**Competition
      and Competitive Strategy**





While
      there are existing companies that provided home assistance, such as Paramed
      and
      Wecare, we were unable to locate established businesses in our target markets
      that offer to teach the non-professional caregiver.





In
      the
      medical community, social workers are assigned to help families set up long
      term
      care for their family member or friend.  However, this assistance is
      generally limited to finding nursing homes or assisted living residences. While
      hospitals provide assessments for a patient/client they do not provide in-
      home
      instruction and training to the non-professional caregiver. College and
      university courses for assisted living and homecare focus on making this area
      of
      study their career choice.





Private
      care homes are the closest alternative to our offering. Few families may be
      able
      to afford these homes, but usually they are forced to wait for openings. In
      these cases, we feel we could have provided a service that meets their temporary
      needs.





We
      believed we were providing a viable, cost effective alternative to what is
      available in the current health care industry.  The intent was to be
      affordable.  Our training services were intended to be practical and
      expedient for many current and prospective caregivers.  We believed our
      approach is a solution for those family members and friends that are not
      looking, or cannot afford, a nursing home or private care facility.





**Dependence
      on One or a Few Major Customers**





Our
      business was not limited by or dependent on one or a few major customers. Our
      customers were individual care givers in British Columbia and Alberta, which
      provided us with a large base from which to build our cliental. The continuing
      reduction of health service options in both Provinces would have allowed us
      to
      fill an increasing need in today's society.  Added to this is the
      ever-increasing need for caregivers to find solutions to caring for the growing
      number of aging "baby boomers" (those born between 1947 and 1966), many of
      whom
      will have assisted living needs.





**Patent,
      Trademark, License & Franchise Restrictions and Contractual Obligations
& Concessions**





We
      did
      not own any patents, trademarks or licenses. There were no inherent factors
      or
      circumstances associated with this industry, or any of the services that we
      plan
      to provide that would give cause for any patent, trademark or license
      infringements or violations.  We had not entered into any franchise
      agreements or other contracts that have given, or could give rise to obligations
      or concessions.





**Existing
      or Probable Government Regulations**





All
      of
      the physical aids we used were available from reputable wholesale distributors
      and manufacturers, and carried the necessary government and industry approvals.
       We did not intend to recommend any products that were restricted or
      regulated in Canada.  We would not have been providing any medical or
      diagnostic advice or evaluation.


4


As
      a
      training service, the major area for government control or need for government
      approval focuses on business licensing, labor and occupational health and safety
      standards.  Our officers and directors were aware of the various
      requirements and would have made the necessary arrangements as the business
      grew
      and employees were hired.  Although certification is not required,
      community colleges offer a certified course for care aids.  Also, upon
      application, a care worker could receive a care aid certification based on
      at
      least two years of related experience in the industry within the last five
      years.





**Research
      and Development Activities and Costs**





We
      did
      not incur any costs related to research and development. We had no plans to
      undertake any such activities.





**Compliance
      With Environmental Laws**





There
      were no environmental laws that have been enacted, nor are we aware of any
      such
      laws being contemplated for the future that addressed issues specific to our
      business.





**Employees**





We
      had no
      employees. Our former officers and directors were responsible for all planning,
      developing and operational duties.





We
      had no
      intention of hiring employees until our business had been successfully launched
      and we had sufficient and reliable revenue streams from our operations. We
      did
      not expect to hire any employees within our first year of operations.





Our
      former President and Board Members had devoted only a portion of their time
      to
      the operation of our business.





**ITEM
       2.     Description Of Property.**





We
      did
      not own any property, real or otherwise.  We had conducted our
      administrative affairs from the office located at the offices of our former
      President, at no cost to our company. We did not have any plants and had minimal
      equipment for the operation of our business. We did not have any investments
      or
      interests in any real estate.





**ITEM
      3.     Legal Proceedings.**





We
      are
      not a party to any legal proceedings, nor are we aware of any contemplated
      or
      pending legal proceedings against us.





**ITEM
      4.     Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders.**





We
      have
      not yet held a stockholders meeting, however the following shareholder actions
      were taken by consent in lieu of meetings:




On
      January 10, 2007, the directors of HomAssist Corporation unanimously approved
      an
      amendment to Section 1.5 of the bylaws of Homassist Corporation to provide
      for
      action by written consent of a majority of the shareholders.




On
      January 22, 2007, the shareholders of HomAssist Corporation unanimously approved
      and authorized the Merger and the related Merger agreement by majority written
      consent of the stockholders of HomAssist Corporation.




On
      January 23, 2007, we filed an amendment to our articles of incorporation with
      the Nevada Secretary of State to: (i) change our name to “DigitalPost
      Interactive, Inc.” and (ii) designate 20 million shares of our authorized
      capital stock as preferred stock and to further authorize our board of directors
      to fix the number of shares of any series of preferred stock and to determine
      the designation of any such series, including the authority to determine the
      designation of any such series, including the authority to determine the rights,
      preferences, privileges and restrictions on any such series of preferred stock.
      This amendment was unanimously approved by our board of directors and by a
      majority (78.2%) of our stockholders by written consent.





On
      January 30, 2007, the Board of Directors approved and a majority (54.2%) of
      the
      Company’s stockholders ratified by consent the Company’s 2007 Incentive and
      Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.


5




**PART
      II**






**ITEM
      5.     Market For Common Equity And Related Stockholder
      Matters**




Our
      shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, are quoted on the OTC
      Bulletin Board under the symbol “DGLP.”  Prior to January 26, 2007, our
      common stock was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “HMAS.” 
Effective January 26, 2007, our stock quote symbol was changed to DGLP and
      remains quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. The following table sets forth the
      range of high and low closing sale prices for the common stock as reported
      by
      the OTC Bulletin Board for the periods indicated below.




**High**
            
            **Low****2006**Fourth
                Quarter
            
            $
            1.51
            
            $
            1.40Third
                Quarter
            
            $
            1.20
            
            $
            1.10Second
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --First
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --**2005**Fourth
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --Third
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --Second
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --First
                Quarter
            
            $
            --
            
            $
            --




The
      closing sale prices in the table above reflect inter-dealer prices, without
      retail mark-up or commissions and may not represent actual
      transactions.




**Holders**




As
      of
      March 26, 2007, there were approximately 62 holders of our common
      stock.




**Dividend
      Policy**




We
      have
      never declared or paid dividends on our common stock.  We intend to retain
      earnings, if any, to support the development of our business and therefore
      do
      not anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future.  Payment
      of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors
      after taking into account various factors, including current financial
      condition, operating results and current and anticipated cash
      needs.




**RECENT
      SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES**




**Shares
      Issued in Connection with the Merger**




As
      part
      of the Merger, we issued 37,233,385 shares of our common stock to the former
      stockholders of Old TFP in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares
      of common stock of Old TFP.  As part of the Merger, in exchange for options
      to purchase 7,724,850 shares of Old TFP common stock, we issued to the holders
      thereof options to purchase an aggregate of 17,426,615 shares of our common
      stock under the same terms and conditions as the Old TFP Option
      Agreements.  As a result of the Merger, the former stockholders of Old TFP
      became holders of DPI common stock, and holders of Old TFP options became
      holders of options to acquire shares of DPI common stock.





Following
      the Merger, there were 52,833,385 shares of DPI common stock outstanding, of
      which the pre-Merger stockholders of HomAssist owned approximately 29.6% and
      the
      pre-Merger stockholders of Old TFP owned approximately 70.4%.




None
      of
      the above transactions involved a public offering, and we believe that each
      transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities
      Act
      by virtue of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation
      D as
      promulgated by the SEC.


6


**DESCRIPTION
      OF SECURITIES.**




**Stock
      Split and Amendments**




Effective
      July 18, 2006, we filed a certificate of change to effect a forward stock split
      of our issued and outstanding common stock.  Our Board of Directors
      approved the forward split pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on July
      13, 2006.  Our filing was incorrect in regard to the certificate of change
      and on August 14, 2006, we filed a certificate of correction in regard to the
      forward split.   The forward split approved by the Board of Directors
      required the issuance of an additional twenty-five common shares for each one
      share issued.  We did not amend our authorized capital.  Therefore,
      our authorized capital remains at 75,000,000 shares of common stock with a
      par
      value of $0.001.  Our issued and outstanding share capital has increased
      from 2,800,000 shares of common stock to 72,800,000 shares of common stock.
      On
      December 13, 2006, the board of directors approved an increase in the authorized
      shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 500,000,000.




The
      certificate of change and the certificate of correction are appended as an
      exhibit to Form 8-K filed and dated July 18, 2006.




On
      January 25, 2007, the board of directors and shareholders approved the the
      reclassification of 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s capital stock to
      preferred stock, no par value, without any series, rights or preferences
      ascribed to it.




**Authorized
      Capital Stock**




We
      are
      authorized to issue 480,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
      share, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per
      share.




**Common
      Stock**




Immediately
      following the Merger on January 30, 2007, there were 52,833,385 shares
      of our common stock issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock
      issued and outstanding.




The
      holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share held and have
      the
      sole right and power to vote on all matters on which a vote of stockholders
      is
      taken. Voting rights are non-cumulative. Common stockholders are entitled to
      receive dividends when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors, out
      of
      funds legally available therefore and to share pro rata in any distribution
      to
      stockholders. Upon liquidation, dissolution, or the winding up of our Company,
      common stockholders are entitled to receive the net assets of our Company in
      proportion to the respective number of shares held by them after payment of
      liabilities which may be outstanding. The holders of Common Stock do not have
      any preemptive right to subscribe for or purchase any shares of any class of
      stock of the Company. The outstanding shares of Common Stock will not be subject
      to further call or redemption and are fully paid and non-assessable. To the
      extent that additional common shares are issued, the relative interest of
      existing stockholders will likely be diluted.




**Options**




As
      of
      December 31, 2006, there were no options to purchase HomAssist stock
      outstanding.




As
      part
      of the Merger, in exchange for options to purchase 7,724,850 shares of Old
      TFP
      common stock, we issued to the holders thereof options to purchase an aggregate
      of 17,426,615 shares of our common stock under the same terms and conditions
      as
      the Old TFP Option Agreements. As part of the terms and conditions of the
      Old TFP Option Agreements, 50% of the options granted and oustanding just prior
      to the Merger fully vested and became exercisable as a result of the Merger
      transaction itself. As a result, 8,713,308 of the 17,426,615 options issued
      are
      fully vested and exercisable.


7


**Warrants**




Just
      prior to the Merger, there were no warrants to purchase HomAssist stock
      outstanding.




As
      part
      of the Merger, we assumed a license agreement as amended which Old TFP entered
      into during 2006, part of which may obligate us to issue warrants to purchase
      our common stock at a future date, pending the achievement of certain milestones
      by the licensee. As of the date of the report, no milestones have been met
      and
      no warrants have been issued.




**Transfer
      Agent and Registrar**




The
      transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is Signature Stock Transfer,
      Inc.




**ITEM
      6.     Management’s Plan Of Operation.**





**EXPLANATORY
      NOTE**




**Due
      to the post acquisition reporting requirements by SEC Rule 13a-1, as discussed
      further in Item 1 above, the following discussion in Managements Plan of
      Operation only refers to the business and financial position and related results
      of HomAssist. It does not included any information on New TFP or DPI.** **For
      information regarding the ongoing business of New TFP or DPI post Merger, we
      advise and refer the reader to the Company’s Form 8-K dated January 30, 2007
      filed with the SEC on or about February 1, 2007 and any related amendments
      filed
      thereafter.**




We
      have
      not generated any revenues from products, services or operations since the
      inception of our company. The foregoing analysis should be read jointly with
      the
      financial statements, related notes, and the cautionary statement regarding
      forward-looking statements, which appear elsewhere in this filing.





**Plan
      of Operation for the Next Twelve Months**





As
      of the
      date of this report, due to the Merger, as further discussed in Item 1 above,
      there are no on-going business activities related to the HomAssist business.
      In
      anticipation of the Merger, on or about December 15, 2006, the HomAssist
      business ceased its activities and sold its remaining assets for an amount
      of
      $15,000 cash proceeds. As a result, there are no further assets or liabilities
      of HomAssist as of December 31, 2006, and there will be no more operations
      of
      the HomAssist business for the next twelve months. Whereas, the Company, as
      the
      surviving entity resulting from the Merger, plans to continue the on going
      business of New TFP for the next twelve months.





In
      preparation of the Merger, discussed above, we had sold all remaining assets
      of
      HomAssist business on or about December 15, 2006 for approximately $15,000,
      which, in turn was used to pay for all professional legal, accounting and
      administrative fees related to the completion of the Merger. As of December
      31,
      2006, our plan of operation going forward was to have already ceased all
      business activities related to HomAssist and was to complete the anticipated
      Merger in January 2007, as discussed above. As a result, as of December 31,
      2006, we had no other plan of operations for the next twelve
      months.





**Milestones**





A
      web
      server space had been contracted from a local internet service provider.
 We had spent approximately $2,000 on our website.  We were in process
      of compiling a brochure, which had served as our primary advertising tool.
       We had anticipated having our brochure ready by the end of the January
      2007, but had not completed it due to the Merger.  We also had planed to
      rely on other forms of direct marketing, such as direct home mail pieces,
      telephone directories, and advertising in local newspapers, none of which we
      initiated due to the Merger.





We
      had
      purchased office equipment and supplies totaling approximately $8,000.
 Demonstration aids were also purchased at a total cost of approximately
      $4,000.  Due to the Merger, we had sold these assets on or about December
      15, 2006.





In
      addition, we had spent approximately $6,500 for consultation with and training
      from industry experts.  We had spent approximately $19,300 towards the
      design and production of marketing and promotional materials.  We had also
      spent approximately $5,900 for a portable display.


8


**Going
      Concern**




We
      have
      not established sufficient sources of revenue to cover our operating costs,
      and
      as such, we have incurred operating losses since inception. Further, as of
      December 31, 2006, our cash resources were insufficient to meet our current
      working capital needs and on going business plan. These and other factors raise
      substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern .The report
      of the independent registered public accounting firm accompanying the audit
      of
      our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 contains
      an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to
      continue as a going concern because of our operating losses and our need for
      additional capital.  Such doubt could make it more difficult for us to
      raise additional capital and may materially and adversely affect the terms
      of
      any financing that we may obtain. The accompanying financial statements do
      not
      include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the
      recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification
      of
      liabilities that may result from the possible inability of us to continue as
      a
      going concern.





Effective
      January 30, 2007, we completed the Merger with Old TFP. As a result,
      we expect
      to continue the issuance of our common stock as a source of capital and use
      the
      proceeds to more aggressively market products and services, and increase revenue
      generating activities of New TFP. See
      Note
      7 for further discussion on the Merger.





**Expenditures**





The
      following table indicates our use of proceeds from the recently closed offering
      in March 16, 2006 and through December 31, 2006:


ExpensesLegal
                  & Accounting
              
              
              8,000Demonstration
                  Aids
              
              
              4,000Marketing
                  and Promotions
              
              
              23,000Office
                  Equipment and Supplies
              
              
              8,000Training
                  & Consulting
              
              
              9,000Website
                  Development
              
              
              5,000Miscellaneous
                  Administrations Costs
              
              
              3,000Total
              
              $
              60,000


The
      above
      expenditure items are defined as follows:





Legal
      and Accounting Fees: This
      expenditure item referred to the normal legal and accounting costs associated
      with maintaining a publicly traded company. It also covered the cost of
      preparation of agreements and documents when appropriate.





Demonstration
      Aids: This
      item referred to the cost of purchasing necessary health care products that
      would have been used in the teaching process.





Marketing
      and Promotions: This
      item
      referred to the cost of marketing and promotion.  It involved the cost of
      providing potential customers with product information.   Also, this
      included the cost of design and construction of a portable display.  The
      display unit with power point presentation would have been used to provide
      a
      corporate presence and marketing outlet at senior centers and related
      organizations.




Office
      Equipment and Supplies :
       This expenditure referred to items such as printer, photocopier, facsimile
      machine, telephone system, industry-related telephone directories and
      catalogues, industry specific magazines and periodicals and other similar office
      requirements. It also includes office furniture such as desks as well as
      computer software and hardware.





Training
      and Consulting: This
      expense referred to the cost of consulting with industry experts for training
      our personnel.





Website
      Development: This
      expense is the cost associated with development of our website. Initially the
      website was used to introduce our services that would have been made available.


9


Miscellaneous
      Administrative Costs :
       This expense refers to any miscellaneous costs that have not been
      otherwise listed - such as bank service charges, corporate and administrative
      items.





We
      did
      not anticipate making any major purchases of capital assets in the next 12
      months, or conduct any research and development.





Prior
      to
      the Merger, we believed we would have had sufficient cash resources to satisfy
      our needs over the next 12 months. Our ability to satisfy cash requirements
      thereafter, and the need for additional funding would have been dependent on
      our
      ability to generate revenue from our business in sufficient quantity and on
      a
      profitable basis. Should we had required additional cash in the future, there
      could have been no assurance that we would have been successful in raising
      additional debt or equity financing on terms acceptable, if at all.





**Related
      Party Transaction**





During
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the HomAssist business used the offices
      of its former President for its minimal office facility needs for no
      consideration.  No provision for these costs has been provided since it has
      been determined that they are immaterial.





**Critical
      Accounting Policies**





As
      of
      December 31, 2006, we had zero assets and zero liabilities due to the sale
      of
      our remaining assets in preparation of the Merger, as further discussed above.
      As a result, our critical accounting policies, related to our assets and
      liabilities as of December 31, 2006 were insignificant. Our critical accounting
      policies related to our operations during the eleven months ended December
      31,
      2006 were also insignificant since we were a development stage company and
      had
      no revenues.





**Recent
      Accounting Pronouncements**




In
      March
      2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, *“Accounting
      for Servicing of Financial Assets,”* (“SFAS
      No. 156”), which amends SFAS No. 140, *”
      Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
      of Liabilities.* ”
In
      a
      significant change to current guidance, SFAS No. 156 permits an entity to choose
      either of the following subsequent measurement methods for each class of
      separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities: (1)
      Amortization Method or (2) Fair Value Measurement Method. SFAS No. 156 is
      effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after
      September 15, 2006. We are currently reviewing the effect, if any, that this
      new
      pronouncement will have on our financial statements.





In
      June
      2006, the FASB issued SFAS Board Interpretation No. 48, “ *Accounting
      for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB statement No.
      109* ”
(“FIN
      48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
      in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB No. 109. The
      interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
      for
      the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
      or
      expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance
      on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
      periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
      beginning after December 15, 2006. Earlier application of the provisions of
      FIN
      48 is encouraged if the enterprise has not yet issued financial statements,
      including interim financial statements, in the period this Interpretation is
      adopted. We are currently reviewing the effect, if any, that this new guidance
      with have on our financial statements.





In
      September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “ *Fair
      Value Measurements* .”
This
      statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
      in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair
      value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements
      that require or permit fair value measurement, the FASB having previously
      concluded in those accounting pronouncement that fair value is the relevant
      measurement attribute. This statement does not require any new fair value
      measurements. However, for some entities, the application of the statement
      will
      change current practice. This statement is effective for financial statements
      issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
      within those fiscal years. We are currently reviewing the effect, if any, that
      this new pronouncement will have on our financial statements.


10


In
      September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
      Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
      No. 87, 88, 106 and 123(R).” This statement improves financial reporting by
      requiring an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of
      a
      defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multi-employer plan) as an
      asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize
      changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
      comprehensive income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets
      for a not-for-profit organization. This statement also improves financial
      reporting by requiring an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as
      of
      the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited
      exceptions. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a
      material impact on our financial statements.





**Subsequent
      Events**





During
      January 2007, we completed the Merger. See Item 1 for further discussion on
      the
      Merger.





**Off
      Balance Sheet Arrangements.**





None.





**Quantitative
      and qualitative disclosure about market risk**





We
      believed our market risk exposures arose primarily from exposures to
      fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates. We transacted business in
      Canadian and US Dollars. We believed that the exchange rate risk surrounding
      the
      future transactions of the Company will not materially or adversely affect
      our
      future earnings. We did not believe that we were subject to any seasonal trends.
      We did not use derivative financial instruments to manage risks or for
      speculative or trading purposes.




**Risk
      Related to our Business**




**Due
      to the post acquisition reporting requirements by SEC Rule 13a-1, as discussed
      further above, this section** ***Risk
      Related to our Business*** **only
      refers to the business activities of HomAssist. It does not included any risks
      related to the business of New TFP or DPI.** **For
      information regarding the ongoing business of New TFP or DPI post Merger, we
      advise and refer the reader to Form 8K, dated January 30, 2007 filed with the
      SEC on or about February 1, 2007 and any related amendments filed
      thereafter.**





You
      should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information
      contained herein as well as the information included in this Annual Report
      in
      evaluating our business and prospects. The risks and uncertainties described
      below are not the only ones we face. Additional unknown risks and uncertainties,
      or that we currently believe are immaterial, may also impair our business
      operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business and financial
      results could be harmed. You should refer to the other information contained
      in
      this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes.





***Our
      Independent Auditors’ Report States that there is a Substantial Doubt that we
      will be able to Continue as a Going Concern.***





Our
      independent auditors, Haskell & White LLP, state in their audit report,
      dated March 30, 2007, that since we were a development stage company, have
      no
      established source of revenue and are dependent on our ability to raise capital
      from shareholders or other sources to sustain operations, there was a
      substantial doubt that we would have been able to continue as a going concern.





***We
      have a limited operating history.***





Prior
      to
      the Merger, we had limited operating history and had been considered in the
      development stage. Our operations would have been subject to all the risks
      inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties
      arising from the absence of a significant operating history. No assurance could
      have been given that we could have been able to operate on a profitable basis.


11


***We
      may require significant additional financing before our products may be marketed
      and sold successfully and profitably.***





Prior
      to
      the Merger, we had only recently raised $60,000 and we anticipated that this
      amount would have only been sufficient to fund our proposed operations for
      approximately the next 12 months. Accordingly, our ability to continue to sell
      our products and services to potential customers, would have been dependent
      upon
      our ability to raise significant additional financing. We weren’t able
      to
      obtain such financing, as such we were not able to fully develop our business.
      We had limited financial resources and to date and no cash flow from operations.
      There were no assurances that we would have been able to obtain financing on
      acceptable terms in light of factors such as the market demand for our
      securities, the state of financial markets generally and other relevant factors.





***Our
      need to provide individualized caregiving plans for instruction may not be
      sufficient to ensure our  success in our intended market, resulting in the
      termination of our operations and a loss of our stockholders’ investment***





Prior
      to
      the Merger, while our business plan included teaching and instruction, it was
      not a business plan that could have relied on a set course with a curriculum.
      Our plan was to provide in home, one on one instruction to non-professional
      caregivers, and we foresaw the need for significant flexibility in our teaching
      and methods. A personalized care routine may have been the need to be developed
      for each client. As such, our survival was dependent upon the market acceptance
      of this specialized instruction method. With a narrow focus on individual care
      plans, our target market may not have been as responsive as we anticipated.
      We
      would not have set course or curriculum to offer to ensure our survival, nor
      have we planned any other operations to generate revenue.





***Our
      Management Team has no experience in the area of sales and marketing, which
      could result in the failure of our business plan.***





Prior
      to
      the Merger, our management had no experience, background or training in the
      field of sales and marketing. We intended to market our product by hiring an
      outside consulting and marketing company to create a power-point presentation
      that we could have used as a presentation at various senior's groups, church
      groups and community groups.  Our then officers and directors would have
      relied on newspaper advertising and personal contacts to attract customers.
       Our then management’s lack of sales and marketing experience could have
      resulted in ineffective sales activities and the loss of revenue, which could
      have caused us to cease operations.





***Inability
      of Our Then Officers and Directors to Devote Sufficient Time to the Operation
      of
      the Business May Limit Our Success.***





Prior
      to
      the Merger, the Then officers and directors of the Company allocate only a
      portion of their time to the operation of our business.





If
      the
      business required more time for operations than anticipated or the business
      developed faster than anticipated, the then officers and directors may not
      have
      been able to devote sufficient time to the operation of the business to ensure
      that it continued as a going concern.  Even if this lack of sufficient time
      of our then management was not fatal to our existence, it may have resulted
      in
      limited growth and success of the business.





***Our
      then management currently controlled our Company and thus you would have most
      likely not been able to influence the control of us through elections to the
      Board of Directors.***





Our
      then
      management, collectively, owned more than 78% of our total issued and
      outstanding shares of common stock. Therefore, our management would have
      continued to retain control of our Company.




12




**Risks
      Related to owning our stock.**




***There
      has been low volume and therefore little prior market for our common stock,
      our
      stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating
      performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above your
      stock purchase price.***




If
      you
      purchase shares of our common stock, you may not be able to resell those shares
      at or above your original purchase price. An active or liquid market in our
      common stock may not develop or, if it does develop, it may not be sustainable.
      The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response
      to
      numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:




•
            price
                and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market;•
            changes
                in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology
                companies generally, or those in our industry in
                particular;•
            actual
                or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;•
            the
                financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in
                these
                projections or our failure to meet these projections;•
            changes
                in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our
                company,
                if any, our failure to meet these estimates or failure of those analysts
                to initiate or maintain coverage of our stock;•
            ratings
                downgrades by any securities analysts who follow our company, if
                any;•
            the
                public’s response to our press releases or other public announcements,
                including our filings with the SEC;•
            announcements
                by us or our competitors of significant technical innovations,
                acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
                commitments;•
            introduction
                of technologies or product enhancements that reduce the need for
                our
                products;•
            market
                conditions or trends in our industry or the economy as a
                whole;•
            the
                loss of key personnel;•
            lawsuits
                threatened or filed against us;•
            future
                sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors and
                significant stockholders; and•
            other
                events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents
                of
                terrorism or responses to these
                events.




In addition, the stock markets, and in particular the OTC Bulletin Board market
      (OTCBB), have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
      affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many
      technology companies. Stock prices of many technology companies have fluctuated
      in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those
      companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action
      litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were involved in
      securities litigation, it could have substantial costs and divert resources
      and
      the attention of management from our business.




***Purchasers
      of our stock may suffer dilution.***




If you purchase shares of our common stock, the value of your shares based
      on
      our actual book value may become less than the price you paid due to our planned
      equity financing. Since inception, our operations have incurred losses, and
      we
      have funded these operating deficits through equity financings or issuance
      of
      our common stock. We plan to issue additional common stock to raise additional
      cash to fund our operating deficits, as such, future issuance of our common
      stock may cause immediate dilution to your holdings or investment. More over,
      if
      previously granted options are exercised, additional dilution will
      occur.


13




***A
      significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from
      immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future. If there
      are substantial sales of shares of our common stock, the price of our common
      stock could decline.***




The price of our common stock could decline if there are substantial sales
      of
      our common stock and if there is a large number of shares of our common stock
      available for sale. As of the date of this report, we have 52,833,385
      outstanding shares of our common stock, of which 37,233,385 are unregistered
      and
      restricted and 15,600,000 shares of our common stock have been previously
      registered under Form SB-2/A filed on or about December 27, 2005, and therefore
      are freely sold in the public market .




Also
      , we
      may register the issuance of all shares of common stock that we have issued
      related to the Merger and may issue under our employee equity incentive plans.
      Once we register the issuance of these shares, they can be freely sold in the
      public market upon issuance.




The market price of the shares of our common stock could decline due to sales
      of
      a substantial number of our shares in the public market or the perception in
      the
      market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.




***Our
      directors, executive officers and principal stockholders have substantial
      control over DPI and could delay or prevent a change in corporate
      control.***




As of the date of this report, our directors, executive officers and holders
      of
      more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, will
      beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 51% of our outstanding common
      stock. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, may have the ability
      to determine the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval,
      including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of
      all
      or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these persons, acting together,
      may have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company.
      Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm the market price of our
      common stock by:




•
            delaying,
                deferring or preventing a change in control of our
                company;•
            impeding
                a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving
                our company; or•
            discouraging
                a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting
                to
                obtain control of our company.




***Maintaining
      and improving our financial controls and the requirements of being a public
      company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our
      ability to attract and retain qualified board members.***




As
      a
      public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules
      and regulations of the OTCBB .
      The
      requirements of these rules and regulations will increase our legal, accounting
      and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult,
      time-consuming or costly and may also place undue strain on our personnel,
      systems and resources.




The Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require, among other things, that we maintain
      effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
      reporting. This can be difficult to do. In order to maintain and improve the
      effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control
      over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight will
      be
      required. We have a substantial effort ahead of us to implement appropriate
      processes, document the system of internal control over relevant processes,
      assess their design, remediate any deficiencies identified, and test their
      operation. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other
      business concerns, which could harm our business, financial condition and
      results of operations. These efforts will also involve substantial accounting
      related costs. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these
      requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on the OTCBB market.


14




Under
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the OTCBB
      market ,
      we are
      not required to maintain a board of directors with a majority of independent
      directors. To the extent we become required to do so, we expect that these
      rules
      and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to maintain
      directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be required to accept
      reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to maintain coverage.
      If we
      are unable to maintain adequate directors’ and officers’ insurance, our ability
      to recruit and retain qualified directors, especially those directors who may
      be
      considered independent and officers will be significantly curtailed.




***We
      are not required to meet or maintain any listing standards for our common stock
      to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which could affect our stockholders’
ability to access trading information about our common
      stock.***




OTCBB
      market is separate and distinct from the Nasdaq Stock Market and any national
      stock exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock
      Exchange. Although the OTC Bulletin Board is a regulated quotation service
      operated by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), that
      displays real-time quotes, last sale prices, and volume information in
      over-the-counter (“OTC”) equity securities like our common stock, we are not
      required to meet or maintain any qualitative or quantitative standards for
      our
      common stock to be quoted on the OTCBB. Our common stock does not presently
      meet
      the minimum listing standards for listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market or any
      national securities exchange, which could affect our stockholders’ ability to
      access trading information about our common stock. Additionally, we are required
      to satisfy the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934,
      as amended (the “Exchange Act”). If we fail to do so, our shares may no longer
      be quoted on the OTCBB.




***We
      do not intend to pay dividends; you will not receive funds without selling
      shares.***




We
      have
      never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not intend
      to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to invest our future
      earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Therefore, you will not receive any funds
      without selling your shares.




***Our
      common stock may be subject to penny stock rules, which may make it more
      difficult for our stockholders to sell their common
      stock.***




Broker-dealer
      practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks” are regulated by
      certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (“SEC”). Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than
      $5.00 per share. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a
      purchase or sale of a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to
      deliver to the customer a standardized risk disclosure document that provides
      information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The
      broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer
      quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its
      salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the
      market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition,
      the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny
      stock the broker-dealer make a special written determination that the penny
      stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s
      written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have
      the
      effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for
      a
      stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules.


15


**ITEM
      7.      Financial Statements And Supplementary Data.**





The
      financial statements required by this Item begin on Page F-1 of this Form
      10-KSB, and include:





**Page**Report
                of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            F-1Financial
                Statements:Balance
                Sheet
            F-2Statement
                of Operations
            F-3Statement
                of Cash Flows
            F-4Statement
                of Stockholders’ Equity
            F-5Notes
                to Financial Statements
            F-6
                to F-12




**ITEM
      8. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting  And
      Financial Disclosure**




On
      or
      about February 26, 2007, we dismissed the accounting firm of Schumacher
      & Associates Inc. as our
      principal accountant. The report of Schumacher
      & Associates Inc. on the
      financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, did not include
      any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or any qualification or
      modification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except
      for
      the addition of an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to
      continue as a going concern. There were no disagreements with Schumacher
      & Associates Inc. on any
      matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure,
      or
      auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction
      of Schumacher & Associates Inc. ,
      would
      have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreement
      in
      their reports on ouir financial statements.





On
      or
      about March 7, 2007, we engaged the accounting firm of Haskell & White LLP
      as our independent registered public accounting firm.




The
      Board
      of Directors approved the change in principal accountants discussed
      above.





**ITEM
      8A.  Controls and procedures**





Evaluation
      of disclosure controls and procedures.





We
      maintained disclosure controls and procedures that were designed to ensure
      that
      information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports were recorded,
      processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
      U.S.
      Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information
      was accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate, to allow
      timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





An
      evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of
      HomAssist’s management, including the former chief executive officer and the
      former chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
      of our disclosure procedures. Based on former management's evaluation as of
      the
      end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we have concluded that our
      disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)
      under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"))
      were
      sufficiently effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed
      by us in the reports that we filed under the Exchange Act is gathered, analyzed
      and disclosed with adequate timeliness, accuracy and completeness.


16


Changes
      in internal controls.





Other
      than the cessation of operations due to the Merger, discussed in Item 1. above,
      there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors
      that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the
      evaluation referred to above, nor were there any significant deficiencies or
      material weaknesses in our internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
      were required or undertaken.





After
      the
      Merger, new internal controls for New TFP and DPI are expected to be implemented
      and be in effect for operating the post Merger activities and business of New
      TFP and DPI.




**ITEM
      8B.   Other Information**





None


17


**PART
      III**







**ITEM
      9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control Persons And
      Coprotate Governance; Compliance With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange
      Act**




**Changes
      in Directors and Executive Officers**




On
      January 30, 2007, as part of the Merger, the then existing directors of
      HomAssist, Ms. Irene Braham, Mr. Ernest Cheung and Mr. Danny Hon resigned and
      Mike Sawtell, Old TFP’s single existing director was appointed as our new sole
      director of DPI. Also, on January 30, 2007, as part of the Merger, Irene Braham,
      President and Chief Executive Officer and Ernest Cheung, Chief Executive Officer
      resigned as the executive officers of HomAssist and were replaced by Mike
      Sawtell and Steven Dong who were appointed as our new President and Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
      DPI.




**Directors
      and Executive Officers**




The
      following persons are our current executive officers and directors since January
      30, 2007, and hold the offices set forth opposite their names:




**Name**
            
            **Age**
            
            **Position**Michael
                Sawtell
            
            48
            
            Chairman
                and Sole Director of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer
                and
                PresidentSteven
                Dong
            
            40
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer




Michael
      Sawtell is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of TFP since July 2005.
      Prior
      to then, he was President and Chief Operating Office of Interchange Corporation,
      a publicly-held Internet advertising and local search company from March of
      2000
      to April of 2005. From
      1993
      to 2000, Mr. Sawtell was the Chief Operating Officer and the Vice President
      of Sales for Informative Research, one of the largest mortgage services firms
      in
      the United States. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Sawtell worked as a director of
      operations on the B-2 Stealth Bomber program for Northrop Grumman
      Corporation, a global defense company. He has also held key operational
      positions at General Dynamics, another global defense company.





Steven
      Dong, has been our Chief Financial Officer since January 30, 2007. >From
      March 2006, he served as TFP’s consulting CFO under a consulting agreement with
      Irvine CPA Group, PC, which is owned by Mr. Dong. Prior thereto, from 1999
      to
      2002, Mr. Dong served as Chief Financial Officer of Taitron Components, Inc.,
      a
      publicly-held semi-conductor company. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Dong served as
      a
      financial consultant specializing in assisting publicly held companies by
      serving as their interim Chief Financial Officer. From 1988 to 1995, Mr. Dong
      was employed by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP, (fka: Coopers & Lybrand, LLP).
      Mr. Dong is a Certified Public Accountant and a member in good standing with
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and California State Board
      of
      Accountancy.





**Family
      Relationships**




There
      are
      no family relationships among the individuals comprising our board of directors,
      management and other key personnel.




**Board
      Committees**




The
      Board
      intends to appoint such persons and form such committees as are required to
      meet
      the corporate governance requirements imposed by the national securities
      exchanges.  Therefore, we intend that a majority of our directors will
      eventually be independent directors and at least one director will qualify
      as an
“audit committee financial expert.” Additionally, the Board is expected to
      appoint an audit committee, nominating committee and compensation committee,
      and
      to adopt charters relative to each such committee. Until further determination
      by the Board, the full Board will undertake the duties of the audit committee,
      compensation committee and nominating committee.


18


**Code
      of Ethics**




We
      have
      formally adopted a written code of ethics that applies to our board of
      directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer and
      employees.




**ITEM
      10.     Executive Compensation.**





As
      of
      December 31, 2006, the former executive officers of HomAssist did not receive
      any compensation since the date of incorporation of HomAssist, and we did not
      accrue any compensation for them. As of December 31, 2006, there were no
      securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plan, or any
      options, warrants, or rights to purchase our common stock.





**Compensation
      of Directors**





As
      of
      December 31, 2006, we did not compensate our directors for their time spent
      on
      behalf of HomAssist, but they were entitled to receive reimbursement for all
      out
      of pocket expenses incurred for attendance at our Board of Directors meetings.





**Pension
      and Retirement Plans**





As
      of
      December 31, 2006, we did not offer any annuity, pension or retirement benefits
      to be paid to any of our then officers, directors or employees, in the event
      of
      retirement. There were also no compensatory plans or arrangements with respect
      to any individual of HomAssist which resulted from the resignation, retirement
      or any other termination of employment with our company, or from a change in
      the
      control of our Company.





**Employment
      Agreements**





As
      of
      December 31, 2006, we did not have written employment agreements with any of
      our
      HomAssist key employees. After the Merger, we entered into executive employment
      contracts with Michael Sawtell and Steven Dong, of which, both agreements were
      filed as exhibits to Form 8-K dated January 30, 2007 and hereby incorporated
      by
      reference.





**Compensation
      Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation**




During
      2006, we did not have a compensation committee or another committee of the
      board
      of directors performing equivalent functions.  Instead the entire board of
      directors performed the function of compensation committee.




**Audit
      Committee**





Prior
      to
      the Merger, the Board of Directors performed the duties that would normally
      be
      performed by an audit committee. We intend to form a separate audit committee,
      and are seeking potential independent directors.  We are seeking
      experienced businesspeople and plan to appoint an individual qualified as an
      audit committee financial expert.





**ITEM
      11. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And
      Management**





The
      following table set forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of
      our
      common stock after consummation of the forward stock split and the Merger,
      except as noted in the footnotes below, by:




· each person known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding
      common stock;




· each of our executive officers;




· each of our directors; and




· all of our executive officers and directors as a group.


19


Beneficial
      ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and is
      calculated based on 52,833,385 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding
      on January 30, 2007.  In computing the number of shares beneficially owned
      by a person and the percentage of ownership of that person, shares of common
      stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable,
      as
      appropriate, or will become exercisable within 60 days of the reporting date
      are
      deemed outstanding, even if they have not actually been exercised.  Those
      shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the
      percentage ownership of any other person.




Unless
      otherwise indicated in the table, the persons and entities named in the table
      have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth
      opposite the stockholder’s name.  The address of each stockholder is listed
      in the table.




**Name and Address of Beneficial Owner**
            
            **Beneficially Owned**
              **Following the**
              **Transactions**
            
            **Percent**
              **of Class**Mike
                Sawtell, CEO and Sole Director (1)
            
            26,168,630
            (3)
            
            46.55%Steve
                Pavlick (2)
            
            3,317,524
            
            
            6.28%Steven
                Dong, CFO (1)
            
            3,019,434
            (4)
            
            5.66%All
                executive officers and directors as a group (2 persons)
            
            29,188,064
            (3)(4)
            
            51.47%






(1)
       One Peters Canyon, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92606.


(2)
       c/o The Family Post, Inc., One Peters Canyon, Suite 150, Irvine, CA
      92606


(3)
        Includes 3,383,875 shares issuable to Mr. Sawtell pursuant to
      options to purchase shares of our common stock within 60 days.


(4)
        Includes 490,493 shares issuable to Mr. Dong pursuant to options to
      purchase shares of our common stock within 60 days.







**Securities
      Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans**




The
      following table sets forth information as of January 30, 2007 with respect
      to
      the stock options issued under our 2007 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option
      Plan, for which our common stock is authorized for issuance.




**Number of securities to**
              **be issued upon exercise**
              **of outstanding options**
            
            **Weighted average**
              **exercise price of**
              **outstanding options**
            
            **Number of securities**
              **remaining available**
              **for future issuance**Equity
                compensation plans or stock option agreements approved by security
                holders
            
            17,426,615
            
            $
            .08
            
            7,573,385Equity
                compensation plans or stock option agreements not approved by security
                holders
            
            —
            
            —
            
            —Total
            
            17,426,615
            
            $
            .08
            
            7,573,285




The
      data
      in the table above reflects the effect of the Merger. As
      part
      of the Merger, in exchange for options to purchase 7,724,850 shares of Old
      TFP
      common stock, we issued to the holders thereof options to purchase an aggregate
      of 17,426,615 shares of our common stock under the same terms and conditions
      as
      the Old TFP Option Agreements.


20


**Stock
      Option Agreements**




***Summary
      of Stock Option Agreements***




During
      2005 and 2006, Old TFP had granted stock options under certain stock option
      agreements as approved, amended and administered by its Board of Directors
      and
      permitted the granting of options for the purchase of up to 7,724,850 shares
      of
      Old TFP common stock.





As
      part
      of the Merger, in exchange for options to purchase 7,724,850 shares of Old
      TFP
      common stock, we issued to the holders thereof options to purchase an aggregate
      of 17,426,615 shares of DPI common stock under the terms and conditions of
      the
      Company’s 2007 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.  As part of
      the terms and conditions of the Old TFP Option Agreements, 50% of the options
      granted and oustanding just prior to the Merger fully vested and became
      exercisable as a result of the Merger transaction itself. As a result, 8,713,308
      of the 17,426,615 options issued are fully vested and exercisable.





Stock
      options granted under those certain stock option agreements were granted at
      prices no less than the
      estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant as determined
      by the Board of Directors,
      provided, however, that (i) the exercise price of an Incentive Stock Option
      (“ISO”) and Nonstatutory Stock Options (“NSO”) shall not be less than 100% of
      the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, respectively;
      and
      (ii) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO granted to a 10% stockholder shall
      not
      be less than 110% of the estimated fair value
      of
      the shares on the date of grant, respectively. ISO and NSO stock options generally
      vest every nine months, over a three year period.




**2007
      Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan**




On
      January 30, 2007, the Board of Directors approved and a majority of the
      Company’s stockholders ratified by consent the Company’s 2007 Incentive and
      Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (“Plan”). The 17,426,615 options to purchase DPI
      common stock issued under the terms of the Merger (discussed above) have been
      issued pursuant to the Plan.




***Summary
      of the Plan***




The
      Plan
      is intended to further the growth and financial success of DPI by providing
      additional incentives to selected employees, directors, and consultants to
      DPI
      and its subsidiary corporations, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e)
      and 424(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") (such
      subsidiary corporations hereinafter collectively referred to as "Affiliates")
      so
      that such employees and consultants may acquire or increase their proprietary
      interest in DPI. Stock options granted under the Plan (hereinafter "Options")
      may be either "Incentive Stock Options," as defined in Section 422A of the
      Code
      and any regulations promulgated under said Section, or "Nonstatutory Options"
      at
      the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") and as
      reflected in the respective written stock option agreements granted pursuant
      hereto.




The
      Plan
      reserves twenty five million (25,000,000) shares of the Company's Common
      Stock.




Administration




The
      Plan
      shall be administered by the Board of Directors of the Company; provided
      however, that the Board may delegate such administration to a committee of
      not
      fewer than three (3) members (the "Committee"), at least two (2) of whom are
      members of the Board and all of whom are disinterested administrators, as
      contemplated by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended ("Rule 16b-3"); and provided further, that the foregoing
      requirement for disinterested administrators shall not apply prior to the date
      of the first registration of any of the securities of the Company under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


21




Eligibility




The
      persons who shall be eligible to receive Options shall be employees, directors,
      or consultants of the Company or any of its Affiliates ("Optionees"). The term
      consultant shall mean any person who is engaged by the Company to render
      services and is compensated for such services, and any director of the Company
      whether or not compensated for such services; provided that, if the Company
      registers any of its securities pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
      amended (the "Act"), the term consultant shall thereafter not include directors
      who are not compensated for their services or are paid only a director fee
      by
      the Company.




The
      Plan
      authorizes the granting of both incentive stock options, as defined under
      Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("ISO"), and non-statutory
      stock options ("NQO") to purchase Common Stock. All employees of the Company
      and
      its affiliates are eligible to participate in the Plan. The Plan also authorizes
      the granting of NQO's to non-employee Directors and others performing services
      to the Company.




Any
      Incentive Stock Option granted to a person who at the time the Option is granted
      owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting
      power of value of all classes of stock of the Company, or of any Affiliate,
      ("Ten Percent Holder") shall have an Option Price of no less than one hundred
      ten percent (110%) of the fair market value of the common stock as of the date
      of grant. Incentive Stock Options granted to a person who at the time the Option
      is granted is not a Ten Percent Holder shall have an Option price of no less
      than one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value of the common stock
      as
      of the date of grant. Nonstatutory Options shall have an Option Price determined
      by the Board as of the date of grant.




No
      option
      granted pursuant to the Plan is transferable otherwise than by will or the
      laws
      of descent and distribution. If there is a stock split, stock dividend, or
      other
      relevant change affecting the Company's shares, appropriate adjustments would
      be
      made in the number of shares that could be issued in the future and in the
      number of shares and price under all outstanding grants made before the event.
      Future options may also cover such shares as may cease to be under option by
      reason of total or partial expiration, termination or voluntary surrender of
      an
      option.




The
      aggregate fair market value (determined at the time an option is granted) of
      the
      Common Stock with respect to which ISO's are exercisable for the first time
      by
      any person during any calendar year under the Plan shall not exceed $100,000.
      Any Option granted to an Employee of the Company shall become exercisable over
      a
      period of no longer than five (5) years, and no less than twenty percent (20%)
      of the shares covered thereby shall become exercisable annually. No Option
      shall
      be exercisable, in whole or in part, prior to one (1) year from the date it
      is
      granted unless the Board shall specifically determine otherwise, as provided
      herein. In no event shall any Option be exercisable after the expiration of
      five
      (5) years from the date it is granted. Unless otherwise specified by the Board
      or the Committee in the resolution authorizing such option, the date of grant
      of
      an Option shall be deemed to be the date upon which the Board or the Committee
      authorizes the granting of such Option.




FEDERAL
      INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES




The
      holder of an ISO does not realize taxable income upon the grant or upon the
      exercise of the option (although the option spread is an item of tax preference
      income potentially subject to the alternative minimum tax). If the stock
      acquired upon exercise of the options sold or otherwise disposed of within
      two
      (2) years from the option grant date or within one year from the exercise date
      then, in general, gain realized on the sale is treated as ordinary income to
      the
      extent of the option spread at the exercise date, and the Company receives
      a
      corresponding deduction. Any remaining gain is treated as capital gain. If
      the
      stock is held for at least two (2) years from the grant date and one year from
      the exercise date, then gain or loss realized upon the sale will be capital
      gain
      or loss and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction. A special basis
      adjustment applies to reduce the gain for alternative minimum tax
      purposes.




An
      optionee does not realize taxable income upon the grant of an NQO. In general,
      the holder of a NQO realizes ordinary income in an amount equal to the
      difference between the exercise price and the market value on the date of
      exercise. The Company is entitled to an expense deduction at the same time
      and
      in a corresponding amount.


22


**ITEM
      12.** **Certain
      Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director
      Independence**




Prior
      to
      the Merger, there are no material relationships between us and our then current
      directors and executive officers other than the use of office space of our
      then
      president for which we paid no rent.




**Director
      Independence**




Presently,
      we are not required to comply with the director independence requirements of
      any
      securities exchange.  In determining whether our directors are independent,
      however, we intend to comply with the rules of the American Stock Exchange
      LLC,
      or the AMEX.  The board of directors also will consult with counsel to
      ensure that the board of director’s determinations are consistent with those
      rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding
      the
      independence of directors, including those adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002 with respect to the independence of audit committee members.  The
      AMEX listing standards define an “independent director” generally as a person,
      other than an officer of a company, who does not have a relationship with the
      company that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent
      judgment.




Currently
      we do not satisfy the “independent director” requirements of the American Stock
      Exchange, which requires that a majority of a company’s directors be
      independent.  Our board of directors intends to appoint additional members,
      each of whom will satisfy such independence requirements.




**ITEM
      13. Exhibits**




Exhibit
                No.
            
            Description2.1
            
            Merger
                Agreement, dated January 16, 2007, between HomAssist Corporation
                and The
                Family Post, Inc. as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07, incorporated
                by
                reference3.1
            
            Articles
                of Incorporation as filed on form SB-2, filed 4/28/05, incorporated
                by
                reference3.2
            
            Bylaws
                as filed on form SB-2, filed 4/28/05, incorporated by
                reference3.3
            
            Amendment
                to Bylaws as filed on form 8k, filed 1/17/07, incorporated by
                reference3.4
            
            Certificate
                of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation as filed on form 8k, filed
                1/25/07, incorporated by reference10.1
            
            2007
                Incentive and Non Statutory Stock Option Plan as filed on form 8k,
                filed
                2/1/07, incorporated by reference10.2
            
            Independent
                Consultant Stock Option Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 between
                The
                Family Post and William Sawtell as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07,
                incorporated by reference10.3
            
            Employment
                Agreement and Stock Option Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006 between
                The Family Post and Samir Patel as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07,
                incorporated by reference10.4
            
            Executive
                Employment and Indemnification Agreement dated as of January 30,
                2007,
                between us and Michael Sawtell as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07,
                incorporated by reference10.5
            
            Executive
                Employment and Indemnification Agreement dated as of January 30,
                2007,
                between us and Steven Dong as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07, incorporated
                by reference10.6
            
            Form
                Stock Subscription Agreement, Form Stock Option Agreement, Form Amended
                Stock Subscription Agreement as filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07,
                incorporated by reference14.1
            
            Code
                of Business Conduct and Ethics as filed on form 8k, filed 1/30/07,
                as
                filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07, incorporated by
                reference21.1
            
            List
                of Subsidiaries of the Company as filed on form 8k, filed 1/30/07,
                as
                filed on form 8k, filed 2/1/07, incorporated by
                reference




23


**ITEM
      14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services**




**Audit
      Fees.**





The
      aggregate fees billed by our successor auditors, for professional services
      rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the eleven months
      ended December 31, 2006 and for the reviews of the financial statements included
      in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB during that fiscal year were $10,000.





The
      aggregate fees billed by our predecessor auditors, for professional services
      rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the year ended
      January 31, 2006 and for the reviews of the financial statements included in
      our
      Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB during that fiscal year were $4,400.





**Audit
      Related Fees.**





We
      incurred no fees to auditors for audit related fees during the eleven months
      ended December 31, 2006 and for the year ended January 31, 2006.





**Tax
      Fees.**





We
      incurred no fees to our auditors for tax compliance, tax advice or tax
      compliance services during the eleven months year ended December 31, 2006 and
      fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.





**All
      Other Fees.**





We
      did
      not incur any other fees billed by auditors for services rendered to our
      Company, other than the services covered in "Audit Fees" for the eleven months
      ended December 31, 2006 and fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.





The
      Board
      of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is
      compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.





Since
      there is no audit committee, there are no audit committee pre-approval policies
      and procedures.








**SIGNATURE**




Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
      has
      duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.




**DigitalPost
                Interactive, Inc**By:
                /s/ Mike
                SawtellName:
                Mike SawtellTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer, President and Sole DirectorBy:
                /s/ Steven
                DongName
                Steven DongTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer




Date:      
      March 30, 2007


24


**Index
      to Financial Statements**







***Audited
                financial Statements***Report
                of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            F-1Balance
                Sheet as of December 31, 2006
            F-2Statement
                of Operations for the eleven months ended December 31, 2006, year
                ended
                January 31, 2006
              and
                for the period from July 15, 2004 (date of inception) to December
                31,
                2006
            F-3Statement
                of Stockholders’ Equity for the period from July 15, 2004 (date of
                inception) to December 31, 2006
            F-4Statement
                of Cash Flows for the eleven months ended December 31, 2006, year
                ended
                January 31, 2006
              and
                for the period from July 15, 2004 (date of inception) to December
                31,
                2006
            F-5Notes
                to Financial Statements
            F-6









REPORT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders of


DigitalPost
      Interactive, Inc. (fka: HomAssist Corporation):





We
      have
      audited the accompanying balance sheet of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)  (the ”Company”),
      a Nevada corporation, as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements
      of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the periods of
      eleven months ended December 31, 2006 , year ended January 31, 2006 and the
      period from July 15, 2004, (date of inception) through December 31, 2006.
      These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based
      on
      our audits.




We
      conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards
      require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance
      about
      whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company
      is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
      internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration
      of
      internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
      procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose
      of
      expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
      over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit
      includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
      disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
      used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
      overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
      a
      reasonable basis for our opinion.




In
      our
      opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
      material respects, the financial position of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc.
      (fka:
      HomAssist Corporation) as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its
      operations and its cash flows for each of the periods of eleven months ended
      December 31, 2006, year ended January 31, 2006 and the period from July 15,
      2004
      (date of inception) through December 31, 2006, in conformity with
      accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
      of America.




The
      accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
      will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
      financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations, and
      negative cash flows from operations since inception. Further, as of December
      31,
      2006, the Company had no working capital. These and other matters raise
      substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
      Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2.
      The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that may
      result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




As
      discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company entered into a
      merger on January 30, 2007.




/s/
      Haskell & White LLP




Irvine,
      CA


March
      30,
      2007


F-1


**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


**(fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)**





**BALANCE
      SHEET**




December
                31, 2006**ASSETS****Current**Total
                Current Assets
            
            $
            -**TOTAL
                ASSETS**
            
            $
            -**LIABILITIES
                AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY****LIABILITIES****Current**Total
                Current Liabilities
            
            $
            -**STOCKHOLDERS’
                EQUITY****Capital
                Stock**Authorized:500,000,000
                common shares, par value $0.001 per shareIssued
                and outstanding:72,800,000
                common shares as of December 31, 2006
            
            
            72,800Additional
                paid-in capital
            
            
            9,200**Deficit
                Accumulated During the Development Stage**
            
            
            (82,000
            )**TOTAL
                LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY**
            
            $
            -






The
      accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this balance
      sheet.


F-2


**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


**(fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)**





**STATEMENT
      OF OPERATIONS**





Eleven
                months
              ended
              December
                31,
              2006
            
            Twelve
                months
              ended
              January
                31,
              2006
            
            Cumulative
              amounts
                from
              July
                15, 2004
              (Date
                of
              Inception)
                to
              December
                31,
              2006**Revenue**
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            -**Expenses**Amortization
            
            
            2,125
            
            
            55
            
            
            2,180Consulting
            
            
            6,500
            
            
            -
            
            
            6,500Office
                and administration
            
            
            4,772
            
            
            601
            
            
            6,663Professional
                fees
            
            
            34,220
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            45,220Marketing
            
            
            19,300
            
            
            -
            
            
            19,30066,917
            
            
            10,656
            
            
            79,863**Net
                Loss from Operations**
            
            
            (66,917
            )
            
            (10,656
            )
            
            (79,863
            )**Other
                Income**Other
                (expense) income
            
            
            (2,225
            )
            
            -
            
            
            (2,137
            )**Net
                Loss for the Period**
            
            $
            (69,142
            )
            $
            (10,656
            )
            $
            (82,000
            )**Basic
                and Diluted Loss Per Share**
            
            $
            Nil
            
            
            Nil
            
            
            Nil**Weighted
                Average Number of Shares Outstanding**
            
            
            71,819,162
            
            
            57,200,000
            
            
            61,609,832






The
      accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this
      statement.


F-3


**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


**(fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)**


**STATEMENT
      OF STOCKHOLDERS’** **EQUITY**




**For
      the Period from July 15, 2004 (Date of Inception)**


**Through
      December 31, 2006**




Additional
            
            
            Deficit
                  Accumulated
                  During
                    TheCommon
                Stock
            
            
            Paid
                In
            
            
            DevelopmentShares
            
            
            Amount
            
            
            Capital
            
            
            Stage
            
            
            TotalJuly
                 15, 2004 - Shares issued for cash at $0.00038
            
            
            41,600,000
            
            $
            16,000
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            16,000September
                13, 2004 - Shares issued for cash at $0.00038
            
            
            15,600,000
            
            
            6,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            6,000Net
                loss for the period
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            (2,202
            )
            
            (2,202
            )Balance,
                January 31, 2005
            
            
            57,200,000
            
            
            22,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            (2,202
            )
            
            19,798Net
                loss for the year
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            (10,656
            )
            
            (10,656
            )Balance,
                January 31, 2006
            
            
            57,200,000
            
            
            22,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            (12,858
            )
            
            9,142March
                  16, 2006 - Shares issued for cash at $0.00385
            
            
            15,600,000
            
            
            50,800
            
            
            9,200
            
            
            -
            
            
            60,000Net
                loss for the eleven months ended December 31, 2006
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            (69,142
            )
            
            (69,142
            )Balance,
                December 31, 2006
            
            
            72,800,000
            
            $
            72,800
            
            $
            9,200
            
            $
            (82,000
            )
            $
            -






The
      accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this
      statement.


F-4


**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


**(fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)**


**STATEMENT
      OF CASH FLOWS**





Eleven
              months
              ended
              December
                31, 2006
            
            Twelve
                months
              ended
              January
                31, 2006
            
            Cumulative
                amounts from July 15, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31,
                2006**Cash
                Flows from Operating Activities**Net
                loss for the period
            
            $
            (69,142
            )
            $
            (10,656
            )
            $
            (82,000
            )**Adjustments
                to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash used by Operating Activities**Amortization
                and depreciation
            
            
            2,180
            
            
            55
            
            
            2,235Loss
                on sale of assets
            
            
            (1,847
            )
            
            
            
            
            (1,847
            )Accounts
                payable and accrued liabilities
            
            
            (5,135
            )
            
            4,135
            
            
            -Net
                cash used by operating activities
            
            
            (73,944
            )
            
            (6,466
            )
            
            (81,612
            )**Cash
                Flows from Investing Activities**Additions
                to capital assets
            
            
            (13,388
            )
            
            -
            
            
            (13,388
            )Sale
                of fixed and intangible assets
            
            
            15,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            15,000Additions
                to intangibles
            
            
            -
            
            
            (2,000
            )
            
            (2,000
            )Net
                cash provided (used) by investing activities
            
            
            1,612
            
            
            (2,000
            )
            
            (388
            )**Cash
                Flows from Financing Activities**Issuance
                of common shares
            
            
            60,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            82,000Net
                cash provided by financing activities
            
            
            60,000
            
            
            -
            
            
            82,000**(Decrease)
                in Cash during the Period**
            
            
            (12,332
            )
            
            (8,466
            )
            
            -**Cash,
                Beginning of Period**
            
            
            12,332
            
            
            20,798
            
            
            -**Cash,
                End of Period**
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            12,332
            
            $
            -**Supplemental
                Disclosure of Cash Flow Information**Cash
                paid for interest
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            -
            
            $
            -Cash
                paid for income taxes
            
            
            -
            
            
            -
            
            
            -







The
      accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this
      statement.


F-5


**DIGITALPOST
      INTERACTIVE, INC.**


**(fka:
      HomAssist Corporation)**


**NOTES
      TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**


**(1)**  **Summary
      of Significant Accounting Policies**





*Organization*





DigitalPost
      Interactive, Inc. (“DPI” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on July
      15, 2004 under the name HomAssist Corporation.  On January 25, 2007, the
      Company changed its year end from January 31 st to
      December 31 st and also
      changed its name from HomAssist Corp. to DigitalPost Interactive,
      Inc.





On
      July
      13, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized a 26-for-1 stock split of the
      Company’s $0.001 par value common stock.  As a result of the split,
      70,000,000 additional shares were issued and capital and additional paid-in
      capital were adjusted accordingly.  All references in the accompanying
      financial statements to the number of common shares and per share amounts have
      been retroactively restated to reflect the stock split.




On
      January 30, 2007, the Company completed a merger, whereby the Company acquired
      all of the outstanding shares of The Family Post, Inc., pursuant to an agreement
      and plan of merger, dated January 16, 2007 (the “Merger”). See Note 7 for
      further discussion on the Merger.




*Basis
      of Presentation - Development Stage Activities*





Prior
      to
      the Merger, the Company was in the development stage and had not yet realized
      any revenues from its planned operations.  The business plan of HomAssist
      was to teach and aid family members and friends to provide home care to the
      disabled or elderly.





Based
      upon the Company's business plan, it was a development stage enterprise.
      Accordingly, the Company presents its financial statements in conformity with
      the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
      that apply in establishing operating enterprises.  As a development stage
      enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the development
      stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception
      to the current balance sheet date.





Effective
      January 30, 2007, the date of the Merger, the Company is no longer be considered
      a development stage company. See Note 7 for further discussion on the
      Merger.




*Cash
      and Cash Equivalents*





For
      purposes of reporting within the statement of cash flows, the Company considers
      all cash on hand, cash accounts not subject to withdrawal restrictions or
      penalties, and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity
      of
      three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.





*Property
      and* *Equipment*





The ** Company’s
      property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation
      and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over estimated
      useful lives of three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to
      operations when incurred. Significant betterments are capitalized and
      depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset.





*Internal
      Web Site Development Costs*





Under
      Emerging Issues Taskforce Statement 00-2, *Accounting
      for Web Site Development Costs (* “EITF
      00-2”), costs and expenses incurred during the planning and operating stages of
      the Company’s web site are expensed as incurred. Under EITF 00-2, costs incurred
      in the web site application and infrastructure development stages are
      capitalized by the Company and amortized to expense over the web site’s
      estimated useful life or period of benefit.


F-6


*Research
      and Development Costs*




The
      Company expenses research and development costs as incurred.





*Revenue
      Recognition*





The
      Company has had no revenues to date. It is the Company’s policy that revenues
      will be recognized in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.
      101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements."  Under SAB 101 and its
      amendment SAB 104, product revenues (or service revenues) are recognized when
      persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (or service
      has been performed), the sales price is fixed and determinable and
      collectibility is reasonably assured.




*Loss
      per Common Share*





Basic
      loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common
      stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
      outstanding during the period. Fully diluted loss per share is computed similar
      to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include
      the
      number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
      potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares
      were
      dilutive. At
      December 31, 2006, the Company had no stock equivalents that were anti-dilutive
      and excluded in the loss per share computation.





*Income
      Taxes and Franchise Taxes*





The
      Company has adopted the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109
      -
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS 109).  SFAS 109 requires the use of the
      asset and liability method of accounting of income taxes.  Under the asset
      and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
      recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences
      between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and
      liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and
      liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
      income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
      recovered or settled.





*Fair
      Value of Financial Instruments*





The
      Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using the available
      market information and valuation methods. Considerable judgment is required
      in
      estimating fair value. Accordingly, the estimates of fair value may not be
      indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market
      exchange. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has no financial instruments
      measured at fair value.





*Impairment
      of Long-Lived Assets*





The
      Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related
      estimated remaining lives when events or circumstances lead management to
      believe that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For the
      period ended December 31, 2006, no events or circumstances occurred for which
      an
      evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets was required.





*Estimates*





The
      financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting principles
      generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial
      statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
      management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
      of
      assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006 and expenses for the periods
      ended December 31, 2006 and January 31, 2006. Actual results could differ from
      those estimates made by management.


F-7


**(2)**  **Going
      Concern**





The
      accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
      generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which
      contemplates the continuation of the Company as a going concern. As of December
      31, 2006, the Company has no business operations. Effective January 30, 2007,
      the Company completed the Merger with The Family Post, Inc. As a result,
      t he
      Company expects to continue the issuance of its common stock as a source of
      capital and use the proceeds to more aggressively market products and services,
      and increase revenue generating activities of The Family Post, Inc. See
      Note
      7 for further discussion on the Merger.





The
      financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
      these
      uncertainties.





**(3)**  **Stockholders’
      Equity**





**Stock
      Split and Amendments**




Effective
      July 18, 2006, the Company filed a certificate of change to effect a forward
      stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. The Board of Directors
      approved the forward split pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on July
      13, 2006.  The filing was incorrect in regard to the certificate of change
      and on August 14, 2006, the Company filed a certificate of correction in regard
      to the forward split.   The forward split approved by the Board of
      Directors required the issuance of an additional twenty-five common shares
      for
      each one share issued.  On December 13, 2006, the board of directors
      approved an increase in the authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000
      to
      500,000,000.




On
      January 25, 2007, the board of directors and shareholders approved the the
      reclassification of 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s capital stock to
      preferred stock, no par value, without any series, rights or preferences
      ascribed to it.





**Authorized
      Capital Stock**




We
      are
      authorized to issue 480,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
      share, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per
      share.




**Common
      Stock**




As
      of
      December 31, 2006, there were 72,800,000 shares of common stock
      outstanding.




Effective
      January 30, 2007, immediately following the Merger on January 30, 2007, there
      were 52,833,385 shares
      of our common stock issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock
      issued and outstanding. See Note 7 for further discussion on the
      Merger.




The
      holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share held and have the
      sole right and power to vote on all matters on which a vote of stockholders
      is
      taken. Voting rights are non-cumulative. Common stockholders are entitled to
      receive dividends when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors, out
      of
      funds legally available therefore and to share pro rata in any distribution
      to
      stockholders. Upon liquidation, dissolution, or the winding up of the Company,
      common stockholders are entitled to receive the net assets of the Company in
      proportion to the respective number of shares held by them after payment of
      liabilities which may be outstanding. The holders of Common Stock do not have
      any preemptive right to subscribe for or purchase any shares of any class of
      stock of the Company. The outstanding shares of Common Stock will not be subject
      to further call or redemption and are fully paid and non-assessable. To the
      extent that additional common shares are issued, the relative interest of
      existing stockholders will likely be diluted.


F-8


**Options**




Just
      prior to the Merger, there were no options to purchase HomAssist stock
      outstanding.




Effective
      January 30, 2007, as part of the Merger, in exchange for options to purchase
      7,724,850 shares of The Family Post common stock, the Company issued to the
      holders thereof options to purchase an aggregate of 17,426,615 shares of the
      Company’s common stock under the same terms and conditions as the Family Post
      Option Agreements. As part of the terms and conditions of the Family Post
      Option Agreements, 50% of the options granted and oustanding just prior to
      the
      Merger fully vested and became exercisable as a result of the Merger transaction
      itself. As a result, 8,713,308 of the 17,426,615 options issued are fully vested
      and exercisable. See Note 7 for further discussion on the
      Merger.




**Warrants**




Just
      prior to the Merger, there were no warrants to purchase the Company’s stock
      outstanding.




Effective
      January 30, 2007, as part of the Merger, the Company assumed a license agreement
      as amended which The Family Post entered into during 2006, part of which may
      obligate the Company to issue warrants to purchase its common stock at a future
      date, pending the achievement of certain milestones by the licensee. As of
      the
      date of this report, no milestones have been met and no warrants have been
      issued. See Note 7 for further discussion on the Merger.




**Stock
      Issuances**




On
      July
      15, 2004, the Company issued 41,600,000 shares of common stock for cash totaling
      $16,000.




On
      September 13, 2004, the Company issued 15,600,000 shares of common stock for
      cash totaling $6,000.





On
      March
      16, 2006, the Company accepted subscriptions for 15,600,000 shares of its common
      stock from 40 investors.  The shares were issued for cash of $60,000 in
      aggregate, under a registration statement on Form SB-2 effective February 3,
      2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





**(4)**  **Income
      Taxes**





The
      Company has had no income, and therefore has paid no income tax.





Deferred
      income taxes arise from temporary timing differences in the recognition of
      income and expenses for financial reporting and tax purposes. The Company’s
      deferred tax assets consist entirely of the benefit from net operating loss
      (NOL) carryforwards.  The Company’s deferred tax assets are offset by a
      valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of the realization of the net
      operating loss carryforwards.  Net operating loss carryforwards may be
      further limited by a change in company ownership resulting from the Merger
      and
      other provisions of the tax laws.





The
      Company’s deferred tax assets, valuation allowance, and change in valuation
      allowance are as follows as of December 31, 2006:




Estimated
                NOL Carryforward
            
            NOL
                Expires
            
            Estimated
                Tax Benefit from NOL
            
            Valuation
                Allowance
            
            Change
                in Valuation Allowance
            
            Net
                Tax Benefit$                 12,858
            
            
            2026
            
            $
            1,929
            
            $
            (1,929
            )
            $
            (1,599
            )
            $
            —




F-9


Income
      taxes at the statutory rate are reconciled to the Company’s actual income taxes
      as follows:





Income
                tax benefit at statutory rate resulting from net operating loss
                carryforward
            
            (34%)Deferred
                income tax valuation allowance
            
            34%Actual
                tax rate
            
            0%





The
      Company’s use of its NOL carry forwards will likely be limited as a result of
      significant ownership changes under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Services
      Code.





**(5)**  **Related
      Party Transactions**





The
      Company used the offices of its former President for its minimal office facility
      needs for no consideration.  No provision for these costs has been provided
      since it has been determined that they are immaterial.





**(6)**  **Recent
      Accounting Pronouncements**




In
      March
      2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, *“Accounting
      for Servicing of Financial Assets,”* (“SFAS
      No. 156”), which amends SFAS No. 140, *”
      Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
      of Liabilities.* ”
In
      a
      significant change to current guidance, SFAS No. 156 permits an entity to choose
      either of the following subsequent measurement methods for each class of
      separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities: (1)
      Amortization Method or (2) Fair Value Measurement Method. SFAS No. 156 is
      effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after
      September 15, 2006. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any,
      that
      this new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.





In
      June
      2006, the FASB issued SFAS Board Interpretation No. 48, “ *Accounting
      for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB statement No.
      109* ”
(“FIN
      48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
      in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB No. 109. The
      interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
      for
      the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
      or
      expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance
      on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
      periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
      beginning after December 15, 2006. Earlier application of the provisions of
      FIN
      48 is encouraged if the enterprise has not yet issued financial statements,
      including interim financial statements, in the period this Interpretation is
      adopted. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any, that this new
      guidance with have on its financial statements.





In
      September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “ *Fair
      Value Measurements* .”
This
      statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
      in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair
      value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements
      that require or permit fair value measurement, the FASB having previously
      concluded in those accounting pronouncement that fair value is the relevant
      measurement attribute. This statement does not require any new fair value
      measurements. However, for some entities, the application of the statement
      will
      change current practice. This statement is effective for financial statements
      issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
      within those fiscal years. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if
      any, that this new pronouncement will have on its financial
      statements.


F-10


In
      September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “ *Employers’
      Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an
      amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 123(R)* .”
This
      statement improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to recognize
      the
      overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other
      than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of
      financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year
      in
      which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity or
      changes in unrestricted net assets for a not-for-profit organization. This
      statement also improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to measure
      the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of
      financial position, with limited exceptions. The Company does not expect the
      adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on its financial
      statements.





**(7)**  **Merger**





Prior
      to
      January 25, 2007, the Company was known as HomAssist Corporation, a Nevada
      corporation (“HomAssist”).  On January 30, 2007, HomAssist acquired The
      Family Post, Inc, a privately held California corporation (“Old TFP”), pursuant
      to an agreement and plan of merger, dated as of January 16, 2007, as amended
      (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among HomAssist, Old TFP and HomAssist’s
      wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub
      and Old TFP, with the Merger Sub being the surviving corporation as HomAssist’s
      wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger”).  Immediately following the Merger,
      HomAssist changed its name to DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (“DPI” or the
“Company”), the Merger Sub changed its name to The Family Post, Inc .
      (“New
      TFP”), and we began operating New TFPs business of Internet content
      sharing.




Effective
      upon the closing of the Merger, the directors elected at the special meeting,
      who comprise all of the then current HomAssist directors, resigned and the
      sole
      director of Old TFP became the new sole director of DPI.




Prior
      to
      the Merger, HomAssist had 15,600,000 shares of common stock issued and
      outstanding. As part of the Merger, the Company issued 37,233,385 shares of
      its
      common stock to the former stockholders of Old TFP in exchange for all of the
      issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Old TFP (16,478,175
      shares).  As part of the Merger, HomAssist also adopted the existing stock
      option agreements of Old TFP (“Old TFP Option Agreements”) outstanding under
      which options to purchase 7,724,850 shares of common stock of Old TFP
      outstanding prior to the Merger were converted into options to purchase
      17,426,615 shares of common stock of DPI.




Following
      the Merger, there were 52,833,385 shares of DPI common stock outstanding, of
      which the pre-Merger stockholders of HomAssist owned approximately 29.6% and
      the
      pre-Merger stockholders of Old TFP owned approximately 70.4%.  As a result,
      Old TFP has been treated as the acquiring company for accounting purposes. 
The Merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with
      generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. 
Reported results of operations of the combined group issued after completion
      of
      the transaction will reflect Old TFP’s operations.


F-11


The
      unaudited condensed combined pro forma supplemental information for the year
      ended January 31, 2006 and the eleven months ended December 31, 2006 are
      presented as if the Merger had occurred on January 1, 2006:





Eleven
              Months
                ended
              December
                31, 2006
              (unaudited)
            
            Twelve
              months
                ended
              January
                31, 2006
              (unaudited)Total
                Revenue
            
            
            15,781
            
            
            4,612Net
                loss
            
            $
            (768,928
            )
            $
            (244,673
            )Basic
                and Diluted Loss Per Share
            
            $
            .01
            
            $
            NilWeighted
                average common sharesoustanding
                - basic and diluted
            
            
            71,819,162
            
            
            57,200,000





**(8)**  **Sale
      of Assets**





In
      preparation of the Merger, discussed above, the Company had sold all remaining
      assets of HomAssist business on or about December 15, 2006 for approximately
      $15,000, which, in turn was used to pay for all professional legal, accounting
      and administrative fees related to the completion of the Merger. The Company
      recorded a loss on the sale of assets in an approximate amount of $2,000 during
      the eleven months ended December 31, 2006.




F-12