SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

 (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V) 

 SIP Submitted by: Maryland Department of the Environment  Date Submitted: October 8, 2014 

 Subject: Amendments to the Control of gasoline and Volatile Organic Compound Storage and Han

 Completeness Review 

 Completed by: Asrah Khadr 

 Date Completed: 11/18/14 

Administrative Materials 

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 

1. Letter dated October 8, 2014, from Robert M

Secretary, Maryland Department of the EnvironM. Garvin, Regional Administrator. 

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 

2. Letter dated July 22, 2013 from Robert M. SSecretary, Maryland Department of the EnvironM. Garvin, Regional Administrator stating that State Implementation Plan (SIP) was revised. 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

3. Robert M. Summers, Secretary, Maryland DEnvironment has delegated authority to adopt athe Maryland SIP revision. 

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 

4. A copy of the amended regulation published 

land Register, volume 41, Issue 14 on July 11, provided in the submittal. 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 

5. Certification by Robert M. Summers, Secretadministrative procedures were followed in lett8, 2014, from Robert M. Summers, Secretary, MDepartment of the Environment to Shawn M. GAdministrator. 

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 

6. Certification from MDE webmaster Diana Anotice was posted on MDE’s website from AprJune 4, 2014. A copy of the public notice as it MDE’s website is provided. 

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 

7. No public hearing was requested. 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 

8. N/A 
Technical Materials 

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Ozone. 2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 

2. The State of Maryland. 

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 

3. The SIP revision will provide emissions beninformation is included in the technical support the submittal. 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 

4. The SIP revision will provide emissions benair quality is protected by the SIP revision. 

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of 

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 

5. Not applicable. 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 

6. Not applicable. 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 

7. Not applicable. 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 

8. Not applicable. 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 

9. Not applicable. 

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 

10. Not applicable because this is not a section