alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott Burhyte, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered October 17, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

Defendant contends that his motion to suppress should have been granted because he was coerced into signing his confession while in a state of intoxication. However, an examination *671of the testimony presented at the suppression hearing fails to show any evidence of coercion or intoxication and any questions of credibility were properly resolved by County Court *(see, People v Jackson,*101 AD2d 955). In rejecting defendant’s further claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive, we note that the 2-to-4-year prison term he received as a second felony offender was part of an advantageous plea bargain, that there is no indication that the agreement was unfair and that the sentence was the most lenient which could have been imposed *(see, People v Bauer,*153 AD2d 988, *Iv denied*75 NY2d 767; *People v Pardoe,*147 AD2d 820).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I,   Douglas W. Child, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



a.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



b.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Douglas W. Child

Douglas W. Child, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



Dated March 31, 2006
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Florida Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Florida Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
SERVED MARCH 1,2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i' Mv^pO^rppnM 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS "i^'pT npfrp/^rl^-'MC 

WASHINGTON, DC -' ~ -. - .^i -o 

??•!) m ^ ? A O- -20 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CISCO AVIATION, LLC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPl ISWOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2011-0060 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and 

considered on May 19,2011, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Room 7006, Casey U.S. 

Courthouse, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002. Hearings will commence at 

9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse 

on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s) \ Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service^. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www. regulations, eov. 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc400/cml_penalty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gOv/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02.tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
FAA Docket No. CPU SWOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

siipil-L»^T 

oiacroi?it>Ni COPY 

:'^v-^ 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. » • 

Washington, DC 20591 . H 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk^ AJGC-4|9 

Wilbur Wright Building—Sui<|2W1000' 

c m COPY 

George E. Crow, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of George E. Crow 

Aviation Law Firm ' ' I ' 

P.O. Box 30 

Katy, TX 77492-0030 ^ ' '^ ' I'" 

TEL: 281-391-9275 i'; . j 

Clyde E Barton, Manager 

Cisco Aviation, LLC 

16055 Space Center Blvd., Suite 235 

Houston, TX 77062-6212 '. '^.< 

YolandaAyala Bernal, Co/Mp/a/na»/'jC<wnse/ '^ ' 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel ' 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 ^ -

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 or 5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Admmis0'&tiye Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 '', 

Washington, DC 20590 ^ « ' , " ; 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advibt^iiii^l2Jfj^fgal Assistant FAk f t ^2-366-7536 

^ Service was by U.S. Mail. For seryioe in pa^jj^^^^pll^^ii^i^.-mi the|ii)lhml^^^;i|iwp^:Fedc^ld^ 

Aviation Administration, 800 Independence |\viE||K^P^i^GiurWrig}it Building-~Siiite£2ipl^ WailttagtoB, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Cleriii. AOC-430.
# Travel/Master s email : trvlmasters@usa.ne t 73 7 N

. Ne

wBalla s (Th e Plaz a Shops ) •St

. Louis , Missour i 6314 1 •31 4 / 432-757 5 •Fa

x31 4 / 432-481 8

Februar y24 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretar y Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Wasinington , D.C

. 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST
2010-001 8 Dea rSecretar yLaHood : As a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor t o fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor t an d Los Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda

. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam o administratio n fo ryou r succes s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k Ope n Skie s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S

. airlines

. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s larges t financia l an d commerc e centers

. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n is likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai r servic e sinc e th e mid-1900 sBot h th e Ne wYor k an d Los Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK & LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , 1 strongl yurg e yo u t o so yye s t o America n Airline s an d its reques t fo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yan d Los Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincerely , Susa n Kottler , CT

C Trave l Counselo r
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4745 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Cypermethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.74 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cypermethrin) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4745 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 321   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 332    | 346    | 322    | 319    | 290    | 236    | 360    | 579    | 815    | 737   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 768    | 703    | 843    | 763    | 777    | 696    | 760    | 596    | 667    | 699   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 563    | 594    | 548    | 603    | 590    | 569    | 566    | 538    | 486    |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Cite as State v. Suter, 2023-Ohio-4590.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

KEVIN K. SUTER, JR.,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2023-03-032

D E C I S I O N

 12/18/2023

APPEAL FROM MIDDLETOWN MUNICIPAL COURT

Case No. CRB 2300126

Ashley Bretland, City of Middletown Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher P. Frederick, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Kevin K. Suter, Jr., the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript 

of proceedings and original papers from the Middletown Municipal Court, and upon the brief 

filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Butler CA2023-03-032

- 2 -

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
[Cite as State v. Suter, 2023-Ohio-4590.]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5023 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic Acid, 5 Chloro-8-quinolinoxy, 

1 Methylhexylester. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic Acid, 5 Chloro8-quinolinoxy, 1 Methylhexylester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACETIC ACID, 5 CHLORO-8-QUINOLINOXY, 1 

4 METHYLHEXYLESTER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acetic Acid, 5 Chloro-8- 

quinolinoxy, 1 

Methylhexylester (CAS No. 

99607–70–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.49.60) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5023 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL. CO. v. SHELL.

No. 16298.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Port Worth.

Jan. 29, 1954.

Bullington, Humphrey, Humphrey & Fillmore and Lee Humphrey, Wichita Falls, for petitioner.

Spence & Rexford, Wichita Falls, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed an original motion in this court whereby it seeks leave to file a Petition for Mandamus in. which it seeks to have this appellate court issue a Writ of *474Mandamus to the District Judge of the 30th District Court of Wichita County, Texas, directing him to enter a judgment in favor of the defendant in a damage suit styled Olin W. White v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, No. 52,265-C on the docket of said court. It is made to appear that following a jury trial of said cause pursuant to which the verdict of the jury was returned with many questions unanswered, but with a finding made that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence which proximately caused his injuries, the court took the case under advisement, and on date of December 29, 1953, entered an order declaring a mistrial. No judgment or final order of any kind was entered.

We believe that leave to file the Petition for Mandamus presented with the motion should not be granted by this court. We have reached this conclusion because the petition fails to show that there is no impediment to the doing of the act sought to be enforced. Neither does such petition negative every defensive fact which the respondent might urge as a legal excuse for not performing the service demanded. Requisites of petitions in a suit for mandamus include these. 28 Tex.Jur., p. 639, sec. 65. This court held in the case of Sartin v. Hudson, Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth, 1940, 143 S.W.2d 817, that such a petition should negative every fact which the officer might urge as a legal excuse for *¡*not performing the service demanded, that in granting a writ against a public official, seeking to compel the performance of a public duty about which the officer may have no personal concern, the court must be fully advised on the subject.

In the same case it was further stated that the propriety of issuing the writ is therefore not to be determined by the defense which the official may interpose, but by the allegation and proof of facts which show affirmatively and clearly that under the particular circumstances he is legally bound to perform the service. The duties of the court would be none the less imperative if the officer failed to set up any defense whatever. It is not a matter which he can waive.

The petition for which leave to file is requested assumes that the respondent Trial Judge could have had no occasion to declare a mistrial of the cause in his court other than because of his belief that the answers returned by the jury in its verdict would not support the entry of a judgment. That there might be numerous other reasons and occasions justifying orders declaring mistrials cannot be disputed. From the petition tendered we are not warranted in concluding that there were none in the present instance.

The motion is denied.
### Blue Sky Aviation, Inc.

PO Box 1495 Tulare, CA 93275 (805) 226-5995 Fax (805)226-5996 April 17,2012 Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 To Whom ItMay Concern: 

## YP/'HTMENT OF ";fW~SPORTATION

..JGKET OPERATIONS lOll ,;PR214 

## P I: 53


# l

Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. hereby petitions for exemption from Part 121, appendixes Iand J ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR) to allow Blue Sky Aviation to cover its safety sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. Blue Sky Aviation operates under 14CFR 135 Certificate #17893BAK for a single-pilot "ondemand" air charter certificate and holds LOA #45WJWP17 for sightseeing airtour operations. Due to the small number ofemployees, (three total) ofwhich one serves inboth capacities, there would be no reduction in safety involved. The drug testing requirement currently subjects our pilot pool to duplicate testing. This, intum, increases our cost ofoperation without an increase in safety. Under one testing program, the pilots will still be subject to drug and alcohol testing in accordance with the appendices I and J ofPart 121. One testing program will ensure the level of safety required by the rules. The public would benefited by reduction ofthe redundant administrative burden posed by inspecting and administering two programs with the essentially the same staff. Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

Ron Overacker, President &DER Blue Sky Aviation POBox 1495 Tulare, CA 93275 (805) 226-5995 tel (805) 226-5996 fax rono@blueskyheli.com Page 1of 1

# il
I I

, 

### , , 

# l I

I I

# I
I I,' , ;'.

t ;< " . ", . ,.. -

. ':,'. .i.'
AIRWARE INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirWare International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Asher, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
Kevin J. AsherKevin J. AsherChief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Accounting OfficerNovember 22, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AirWare International Corp. and will be retained by AirWare International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.