alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOLLAND v. STATE.

No. 26109.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1952.

*52No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty. Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant entered his plea of guilty on a charge of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The court assessed his punishment at a fine of $150.

The record before us on appeal contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. The proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### James J. WARJAK, alias Dale Norman Cline, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27782.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Sam L. Jones, Jr., Dist. Atty., Corpus Christi, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and his punishment assessed at 12 years in the penitentiary.

It appears by proper proof that after perfecting his appeal to this court, appellant escaped from the custody of the sheriff. It follows that this court , is without jurisdiction to do other than dismiss the appeal. Art.-824, V.A.C.C.P.

The State’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

d0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144437

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144437 COA: 296546 Saginaw CC: 08-031799-FC KENDRICK DEON STANTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the nine months ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: June 23, 2010
 
 GORDON BROOKE
 B. Gordon Brooke
 Chief Accounting Officer
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 -1-
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Neuvosto

----

Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Marokon kuningaskunnan välisestä assosioinnista tehdyssä Euro—Välimeri-sopimuksessa vahvistetuista alkuperätuotteiden käsitteen määritelmään ja hallinnollisen yhteistyön menetelmiin liittyvistä määräyksistä poikkeamisesta 4 päivänä elokuuta 2005 tehdyn EU—Marokko-assosiaationeuvoston päätöksen N:o 1/2005 (EUVL L 206, 9.8.2005, s. 8) voimaantulo

(2006/C 76/01)

Marokon kuningaskunnan ja Turkin välinen vapaakauppasopimus tuli voimaan 1. tammikuuta 2006.

EU—Marokko-assosiaationeuvoston päätöksen N:o 1/2005 2 artiklassa säädetyt edellytykset ovat siten täyttyneet ja päätöstä voidaan näin ollen soveltaa 1. tammikuuta 2006 alkaen.

----

Komissio

----

Euron kurssi (1)

28. maaliskuuta 2006

(2006/C 76/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Lähde: Euroopan keskuspankin ilmoittama viitekurssi.

----

----

Ennakkoilmoitus yrityskeskittymästä

(Asia COMP/M.4183 — Foodco Pastries/Tele Pizza)

Yksinkertaistettuun menettelyyn mahdollisesti soveltuva asia

(2006/C 76/03)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

----

(1)EUVL L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)EUVL C 56, 5.3.2005, s. 32.

----
----

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division) — BUPA Hospitals Ltd, Goldsborough Developments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise

(Case C-419/02) (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 10(2) - Chargeability of VAT - Payment of amounts on account - Prepayments for future supplies of pharmaceutical products and prostheses)

(2006/C 131/02)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BUPA Hospitals Ltd, Goldsborough Developments Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners of Customs & Excise

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice, Chancery Division — Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145 p. 1) — Concepts of ‘supply of goods’ and ‘economic activities’ — Contracts between companies for the supply of pharmaceutical products and prostheses having the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage.

Operative part of the judgment

Prepayments of the kind at issue in the main proceedings whereby lump sums are paid for goods referred to in general terms in a list which may be altered at any time by agreement between the buyer and the seller and from which the buyer may possibly select articles, on the basis of an agreement which he may unilaterally resile from at any time, thereupon recovering the unused balance of the prepayments, do not fall within the scope of the second subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995.

----

(1)OJ C 31, 08.02.2003

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5025 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trifluralin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trifluralin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLURALIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.33 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 trifluralin) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

7 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5067 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5067

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulfonic 
                                 acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulfonic 
                                 acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-PHENYL-1H-BENZIMIDAZOLE-5-SULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2-phenyl-1H-        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          benzimidazole-5-                                                  12/31/2015
                          sulfonic acid,
                          (CAS No. 27503-81-
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2933.99.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Michail Zolotas, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of NewLeadHoldings Ltd.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 9, 2014
Washington Mutual

 

 

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, Washington Mutual, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform *Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*. As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $110 million and $20 million, respectively.

 

Craig S. Davis

Craig S. Davis

President

Home Loans & Insurance Services Group

 

Anthony T. Meola

Anthony T. Meola

Executive Vice President

Home Loans & Insurance Services Group

 

February 18, 2003
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Colorado Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Colorado Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 177   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 194    | 204    | 186    | 183    | 155    | 173    | 148    | 166    | 181    | 209   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 169    | 197    | 226    | 214    | 248    | 273    | 287    | 264    | 260    | 303   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 316    | 345    | 396    | 395    | 465    | 484    | 478    | 559    | 716    |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February 28,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Alexander B. Magallano, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:  March
30, 2010





ALEXANDER B.
MAGALLANO


Alexander
B. Magallano


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director

















-1-
#### LOCKE v. STATE.

No. 24659.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1949.

Motion to Reinstate Appeal Denied Jan. 4, 1950.

W- J- Lowe, Clarenden, for appellant,

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of drunk driving and by the jury fined the sum of $50.00, and from á judgment thereunder-he appeals. ■

*180This cause was tried on August 3, 1949, and judgment rendered on the same date. Notice of appeal was entered of record on August 24, 1949, and the amount of bond was fixed at the sum of $150.00.

It is now made known to this court that neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond has been entered into by the appellant, and that he is not confined in jail. The State’s Attorney moves to dismiss the appeal. See Art. 830, note 2, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Vol. 3, and cases cited; also Grant v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 9, 7 S.W.2d 90; and Tristan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 16 S.W.2d 1081.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
**Exhbit      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | the                  Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December                  31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                    June                    27, 2005 |  | By: | /s/                    Neil McMillan           |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |  |     | President, CEO and                    Director |
Case: 21-50569 Document: 00516019919 Page:1 Date Filed: 09/20/2021

FILED
SEP 2 0 2021 ;
Gnited States Court of Appealguersus oisr er

ESTERN DISTRICT’
BY. TEKAS

for the Fifth Circuit ——BEBUTV LER

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50569 FILED
September 20, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce
Luana M. Moopy, Clerk

Plaintiff —Appellant,
versus

IHOP,

Defendant —Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:20-CV-374- SAE

CLERK’S OFFICE:

Under 5TH Cir. R. 42.3, the appeal is dismissed as of September
20, 2021, for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to timely file
appellant’s brief and record excerpts.


Case: 21-50569 Document: 00516019919 Page:2 Date Filed: 09/20/2021

No. 21-50569

LYLE W. CAYCE

Clerk of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
By:

Lisa E. Ferrara, Deputy Clerk

ENTERED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT