alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|U.S. Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|U.S. Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8,129  | 9,582  | 8,950 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 9,357  | 10,491 | 8,349  | 6,909  | 8,299  | 7,169  | 6,065  | 4,587  | 6,803  | 6,339 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 7,952  | 5,090  | 4,675  | 6,103  | 6,941  | 6,843  | 7,757  | 10,585 | 8,197  | 7,043 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 14,787 | 16,380 | 14,769 | 16,454 | 18,198 | 21,050 | 21,778 | 27,107 | 26,687 | 42,139
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 44,783 | 45,909 | 45,167 | 49,131 | 44,599 | 31,233 | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss*et seq.*). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath River Basin. The objective of this meeting is to review the progress of the 2000 Klamath chinook salmon fishing season and plan for fishery management in 2001. The meeting is open to the public.                     

# DATES:

The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000; from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 26, 2000; and from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Friday, October 27, 2000. 

*Place:*                         The meeting will be held at the Yreka Fish and Wildlife Office, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, California.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, California 96097, telephone (530) 842-5763. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    For background information on the Klamath Council, please refer to the notice of their initial meeting that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).                 

Dated: September 25, 2000. 

Elizabeth H. Stevens.

California/Nevada Operations Manager, California/Nevada Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-25147 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
----

Action brought on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Portuguese Republic

(Case C-90/06)

(2006/C 86/35)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Portuguese Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 February 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by António Caeiros and Amparo Alcover, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the Directive 2002/49 expired on 18 July 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 189 of 18.7.2002, p. 12.

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS JOSE GONZALEZ-ONTIVEROS,

AKA Jesus Jose Gonzalez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70794

Agency No. A094-373-069

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 20, 2016** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Jose Gonzalez-Ontiveros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable and denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

FILED

JAN 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Gonzalez-Ontiveros does not meaningfully challenge the BIA’s denial of

CAT relief or the BIA’s dispositive determination that he failed to establish a

particular social group for an asylum or withholding of removal claim. See

Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

supported by argument are deemed abandoned). 

We decline Gonzalez-Ontiveros’ request to extend the holding in Desir v.

Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1988) to the situation in Mexico and GonzalezOntiveros’ distinguishable claims. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 14-70794
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MAY 28,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-27-1999             AUG-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-28-1999             MAY-28-1999
<CASH>                                             628                     628
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20256                   20256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      18023                   18023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 39922                   39922
<PP&E>                                          169755                  169755
<DEPRECIATION>                                   76104                   76104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  134571                  134571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23137                   23137
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         42                      42
<COMMON>                                          2788                    2788
<OTHER-SE>                                       73221                   73221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    134571                  134571
<SALES>                                          32575                   89091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 32575                   89091
<CGS>                                            28527                   79224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4684                   17546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 799                    1787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1435                    9466
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1956                   11059
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .18                    1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18                    1.02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

            ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.19

                      Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
             Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R1

            I, John P. Grazer, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed
Executive Vice President of Ameriquest Mortgage Company (the "Master Servicer"),
and further certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"),
among Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, the Master Servicer and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding year and the Master Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Agreement.

Dated: 3/14/06
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ John P. Grazer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: John P. Grazer
                                                Title: Executive Vice President


            I, Denise Apicella, an Assistant Secretary of the Master Servicer,
hereby certify that John P. Grazer is a duly elected, qualified, and acting
Executive Vice President of the Master Servicer and that the signature appearing
above is his genuine signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ Denise Apicella
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: Denise Apicella
                                                Title: Assistant Secretary
|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                        
|Arkansas Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|Arkansas Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 63     | 869    | 7      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

DONNA LANGAN, TERESA DE 

BARBARAC, and ALEXANDRA CARSON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GREG ABBOTT, in his Official Capacity as 

Governor of Texas; and KEN PAXTON, in his 

Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-cv-275-RP

ORDER

On this day came before the Court the Unopposed Motion to Stay Pretrial Proceedings 

Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss. The Court having reviewed the motion, enters the following 

order:

It is ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Stay Pretrial Proceedings Pending Ruling 

on Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to file their proposed scheduling 

order shall be 24 days after this Court issues its order on Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss 

(Dkt. 5).

Signed __________________________________, 2020.

___________________________________

HONORABLE ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00275-RP Document 6-1 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 1
---

---

Exhibit 13

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Form 20-F
annual report of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd (the Company) for the period
ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the annual report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

1.    
          the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2006

| |  | /s/ Giora Ben-ZeevChief Executive Officer/s/ Amir HaiChief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Opinion issued June 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00134-CR

NO. 01-13-00135-CR

———————————

JOSE LUIS GARCIA III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1318638 and 1366267

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In trial court cause number 1318638, appellant, Jose Luis Garcia III, pleaded 

guilty to the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance, namely, 

methamphetamine, weighing more than 1 gram and less than 4 grams, and pleaded 
2

true to a felony enhancement. In trial court cause number 1366267, appellant

pleaded guilty to the felony offense of unlawful possession of a firearm, and 

pleaded true to a felony enhancement. In each cause number, the trial court found 

appellant guilty, found the enhancement true, and, in accordance with appellant’s 

plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for three years, 

with the sentences to run concurrently. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a notice 

of appeal in each cause. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

The trial court must enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal 

each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that 

were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after getting the 

trial court’s permission to appeal. Id. If a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record, we must dismiss the 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The clerk’s record filed in each appeal reflects that the trial court certified 

that the case is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record in each case supports the trial 

court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005). Further, in each case, the record does not reflect that the trial court ruled 

adversely to appellant on any matters raised by written motion filed and ruled on 
3

before trial, and appellant did not get the trial court’s permission to appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Barcenas v. State, 137 S.W.3d 865, 866 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 

Because appellant does not have a right of appeal, we must dismiss the 

appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain 

whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), 

must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action.”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s 

pro se motion to dismiss the appeals, which is not signed by counsel, is dismissed 

as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Any other pending motions are dismissed as 

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### Warren GENTRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27364.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for defendant.

¡Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

•PER CURIAM.

.•The conviction .is for unlawfully selling intoxicating, liquor in a dry area; the penalty assessed is a fine of $200.

No notice of appeal • appears in'the iec--' ord.. In the- absence thereof,- this court.is without jurisdiction to entertain the,-appeal. It is,therefore dismissed.,
Exhibit 4.76

[*]: THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

Addendum No. 2 to the bareboat charter dated 20 April 2004 between NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. as charterers and Ocean Voyager Limited as owners in relation to the vessel named MV Norwegian Majesty
(the Charter)



|1. | The parties have agreed that the Charter Period set out in box 21 of the Charter shall be amended to read The Vessel shall be redelivered between [*] and [*].
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The parties have agreed that facsimile signatures for this Addendum No. 2 shall be deemed valid and binding upon the parties and shall have the same force and effect as
original signatures on this Addendum No. 2.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Save as expressly provided by this Addendum No. 2, all other terms and conditions of the Charter, as amended, shall remain unamended and in full force and effect.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Colin Veitch                       
|For and on behalf of NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.

Date: 30 May 2008



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Chong Chee Tut                        
|For and on behalf of Ocean Voyager Limited

Date: 30 May 2008