alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0      | 1      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 32.2**

***Certification pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C.Section 1350)***

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American States Water Company and Golden State WaterCompany (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I Robert J. Sprowls, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Robert J. Sprowls

Robert J. SprowlsSenior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

Date: August 9, 2006

 

1

----
BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC

100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500

Garden City, NY 11530

Tel: (516) 203-7600

Our File No: 121499

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Bee Creek Photography,

Plaintiff,

v.

Thompson Realty Group LLC,

Defendant.

§

§ Case No: 1:20-cv-00247-LY

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff 

and/or plaintiff's counsel, hereby give notice that whereas no party is an infant or incompetent 

the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 28, 2021

BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC

By: /s Craig B. Sanders

Craig B. Sanders

100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 

Garden City, New York 11530

Email: csanders@barshaysanders.com

Tel: (516) 203-7600

Fax: (516) 282-7878

Our File No: 121499

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 1:20-cv-00247-LY Document 11 Filed 06/28/21 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 23    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 46     | 51     | 79     | 94     | 99     | 65     | 55     | 50     | 47     | 34    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 40     | 33     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

182) ll-E-142 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 A M , Sheet 182 of 264 
P.2 

-06-9 8 12:18 P Creativ e Pultrusion s 

04/06/9S 14:11 t*l»19»U0234 

From: 

1 50 5 34 7 574 1 P.O l 

Contact Report 

Melanie Proctor and Robert Jemison, 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

April 2,1998 

Mr. Dave Evans 

Creative Pultrusions, Inc 

Telephone Number: (505) 347-2226 

Fw Number. (505) 347-5741 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Contact Summary: 

Ms. Proctor explained that PES is working with the U.S. EPA on the development of a 

national emission standard for the reinforced plastic composites industry. She added that the EPA 

is in the process of determining the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) floor for 

pultrusion operations. Ms. Proctor indicated that the purpose of this call was to discuss the emission 

control measures that Creative Pultrusions, Inc. is using on their pultrusion lines at their facility 

located in Alum Bank, Pennsylvania. 

Mr. Evans explained that the Alum Bank facility uses the following four emission control 

measures on its pultrusion lines: (1) air curtains that reduce the air flow around the wet area (resin 

bath, forming area, and die) to 15 feet per minute, (2) covers on tiie resin baths, (3) pre-form resin 

injection, and/or (4) direct die injection. Mr. Evans further explained that all pultrusion lines have 

air curtains and the resin bath is covered for all pultrusion lines that have a resin bath. He added that 

some of their pultrusion lines use either pre-form resin injection or direct die injection. Mr. Evans 

added that the number of lines using pre-form resin injection or direct die injection is variable and 

depends on the products produced. 

(Contact report continued on second page) 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 
P.3 

Apr-06-9 8 12:18 P Creativ e Pultrusion s 1 50 5 34 7 574 1 P 0 2 

• 04/06/98 14:12 ©19199410234 -

r & j *\ * * 

Ms. Proctor asked Mr. Evans to provide information on how many pultrusion lines were 

controlled by using pre-form resin injection and how many lines were controlled by using direct die 

injection during the 1994 emission test that showed an average emission factor of 1.9 percent of 

available hazardous air pollutants. Mr. Evans replied that five pultrusion lines were using direct die 

injection, several lines were using pre-form injection, and several lines were controlled by air flow 

management and bath covers during that test. Mr. Evans indicated that he would have to check on 

the exact number of lines that were using pre-form resin injection during the emission test. 

When Mr. Evans was asked if die production scenarios that were tested in the 1994 emission 

tests were representative of the normal operation or if worst case scenarios were tested, he replied 

that the scenarios tested were representative of normal operations. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOY EDISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:10-cr-00493-JFM-3; 1:12-cv-02503-JFM)

Submitted: July 17, 2013 Decided: July 31, 2013

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joy Edison, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joy Edison seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Edison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25376]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 72-3]


Carolina Power & Light Company, H.B. Robinson Independent Spent 
Fuel Storage Installation; Notice of Docketing of Materials License 
SNM-2502 Amendment Application

    By letter dated August 28, 2000, Carolina Power and Light Company 
(CP&L) submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(NRC or the Commission), in accordance with 10 CFR part 72, requesting 
the amendment of the H. B. Robinson (HBR) independent spent fuel 
storage installation (ISFSI) license (SNM-2502) and the Technical 
Specifications for the ISFSI located at Darlington County, South 
Carolina. CP&L is seeking Commission approval to amend the materials 
license and the ISFSI Technical Specifications to revise the safeguards 
license condition and the Technical Specifications to reflect that the 
Industrial Security Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan are combined 
into the Physical Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan. The 
revision would also clarify the text to indicate that the Training and 
Qualification Plan no longer contains safeguards information. Such an 
action would only change the reference to and the location of the 
Industrial Security Plan and the Safeguards Contingency Plan. The 
requested change does not affect the design, operation, maintenance, or 
surveillance of the ISFSI.
    This application was docketed under 10 CFR part 72; the ISFSI 
Docket No. is 72-3 and will remain the same for this action. The 
amendment of an ISFSI license is subject to the Commission's approval.
    The Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, or 
his designee, will determine if the amendment presents a genuine issue 
as to whether public health and safety will be significantly affected 
and may issue either a notice of hearing or a notice of proposed action 
and opportunity for hearing in accordance with 10 CFR 72.46(b)(1) or 
take immediate action on the amendment in accordance with 10 CFR 
72.46(b)(2).
    For further details with respect to this application, see the 
application dated August 28, 2000, which is available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, One White Flint 
North Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD or from the 
publicly available records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). 
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at Http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/indes.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of September 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Susan F. Shankman,
Acting Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 00-25376 Filed 10-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

***Certification pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

***(18 U.S.C.Section 1350)***

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American States Water Company and Golden State WaterCompany (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Floyd E. Wicks

Floyd E. WicksChief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2006

 

1

----
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
AFS-12-190-E February 24, 2012

Mr. Adrian Bonilla

1902 Mission Creek Circle Houston, TX 77084

Dear Mr. Bonilla:

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated January 25, 2012 (public docket No. FAA-2009-0223) petitioni ng the Federal Aviation Administration for an extension to Exemption No. 9851. That exemption from 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) allowed you to conduct flight instruction in certain Beechcraft aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover wheel instead of functioning dual

controls.

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR Part 91 related to throwover control wheels (76 FR 54107). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida Klepper Manager, Airman and Airspace Rules Division
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                       EXHIBIT 12             
                          AMOCO CORPORATION                                   
                          __________________
                                                                                
           STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF                    
                      EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                (millions of dollars, except ratios)
                                                                               
                                                                              
                               Nine                                    
                             Months
                              Ended                                           
                             Sept. 30,         Year Ended December 31,         
                               1998      1997   1996     1995    1994    1993
                                                                        
Determination of Income:                                                
  Consolidated earnings                                                 
    before income taxes                                                 
    and minority interest..  $ 1,249    $3,771 $3,965   $2,404  $2,491  $2,506
  Fixed charges expensed by                                             
    consolidated companies.      369       452    412      406     316     350
  Adjustments for certain                                               
    companies accounted for                                             
    by the equity method...      107        66     69       25       7      11
                                                                        
  Adjusted earnings plus                                                
    fixed charges..........  $ 1,725    $4,289 $4,446   $2,835  $2,814  $2,867
                                                                        
Determination of Fixed Charges:                                              
  Consolidated interest on                                              
    indebtedness (including                                             
    interest capitalized)..  $   297    $  363 $  317   $  317  $  288  $  299
  Consolidated rental                                                   
    expense representative                                              
    of an interest factor..       75       102    107       89      23      50
  Adjustments for certain                                               
    companies accounted for                                             
    by the equity method...       45         7      8        6       5       8
                                                                        
  Total fixed charges......  $   417    $  472 $  432   $  412  $  316  $  357
                                                                        
Ratio of earnings to                                                    
  fixed charges............      4.1       9.1   10.3      6.9     8.9     8.0