IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 97jJ APR 2 I AM tO: 19 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER § 

FOR CHOICE, PLANNED § 

PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS § 

SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES, § 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH § 

TEXAS SURGICAL CENTER, WHOLE § 

WOMAN'S HEALTH, WHOLE § 

WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, § 

SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S § 

SURGERY CENTER, BROOKSIDE § 

WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER PA § 

D/BA BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S § 

HEALTH CENTER AND AUSTIN'S § 

WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, § 

ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S., § 

ALAMO CITY SURGERY CENTER § 

PLLC D/B/A ALAMO WOMEN'S § 

REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES, § 

HOUSTON WOMEN'S § 

REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES, AND § 

HOUSTON WOMEN'S CLINIC, § 

PLAINTIFFS, § 

§ 

V. § 

§ 

GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF § 

TEXAS, KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY § 

GENERAL OF TEXAS, PHIL WILSON § 

ACTING EXECUTIVE § 

COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS § 

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES § 

COMMISSION, STEPHEN BRINT § 

CARLTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR § 

OF THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, § 

KATHERINE A. THOMAS, § 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE § 

TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING, EACH § 

IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND § 

MARGARET MOORE, DISTRICT § 

ATTORNEY FOR TRAVIS COUNTY, § 

JOE GONZALES, CRIMINAL § 

CAUSE NO. A-20-CV-323-LY 

q:. 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 95 Filed 04/21/20 Page 1 of 3
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR BEXAR 

COUNTY, JAIME ESPARZA, DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY FOR EL PASO COUNTY, 

JOHN CREUZOT, DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY FOR DALLAS COUNTY, 

SHAREN WILSON, CRIMINAL 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY TARRANT 

COUNTY, RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

FOR HIDALGO COUNTY, BARRY 

JOHNSON, CRIMINAL DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY FOR MCLENNAN 

COUNTY, KIM OGG, CRIMINAL 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR HARRIS 

COUNTY, AND BRIAN MIDDLETON 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

FOR FORT BEND COUNTY, EACH IN 

THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, 

DEFENDANTS. 

nj 1,) 31 

IN THIS CASE on April 13, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint for Injunctive and 

Declaratory Relief adding Houston Women's Clinic as a plaintiff (Clerk's Doc. #67). On April 14, 

2020, Houston Women's Clinic filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Clerk's Doc. #79). 

On April 17, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory 

Relief adding Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC dlb/a Alamo Women's Reproductive Services and 

Houston Women's Reproductive Services as plaintiffs (Clerk's Document #86). Also, on April 17, 

202, Alamo City Surgery Center and Houston Women's Reproductive Services filed a Motion for 

Temporary Restraining Order (Clerk's Doc. #87). 

On April 9, 2020, before Houston Women's Clinic, Alamo City Surgery Center, and Houston 

Women's Reproductive Services appeared plaintiffs, this court rendered an Order Granting 

Plaintiffs' Second Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Clerk's Doe. #63). Houston 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 95 Filed 04/21/20 Page 2 of 3
Women's Clinic, Alamo City Surgery Center, and Houston Women's Reproductive Services each 

move for a temporary restraining order to place it in the same position in this case as the other 

plaintiffs. The court finds that Houston Women's Clinic, Alamo City Surgery Center, and Houston 

Women's Reproductive Services are similarly situated to the other plaintiffs and bringing them under 

the existing temporary restraining order will neither delay resolution of this case nor change the 

status of or work a hardship on any other party. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Houston Women's Clinic's Motion for 

Temporary Restraining Order (Clerk's Doe. #79) and Plaintiffs Alamo City Surgery Center's and 

Houston Women's Reproductive Services; Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Clerk's Doe. 

#87) are GRANTED as follows: Houston Women's Clinic, Alamo City Surgery Center, and 

Houston Women's Reproductive Services as plaintiffs in this case, are covered by and subject to this 

court's April 9, 2020, temporary restraining order to the same extent as the original plaintiffs and 

are entitled to all rights, privileges, and immunities set forth in the April 9, 2020 order, as modified 

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit by that court's orders of April 10 and 

April 13, 2020. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. 

SIGNED day of April, 2020. 

ITED STA ES DIS 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 95 Filed 04/21/20 Page 3 of 3