alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.26.1

                              Amendment No. 1 to
                               Therma-Wave, Inc.
                    2000 Employee Stock Purchase Agreement


     The Therma-Wave, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Agreement (the "ESPP")
is hereby amended effectively as of July 28, 2001 by amending and restating
Section 13 of the ESPP as follows:

     13.  STOCK

          (a)  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 19, the maximum
     number of Shares which shall be made available for sale under the Plan
     shall be 1,500,000 Shares or such lesser number of Shares as is determined
     by the Board. If the Board determines that, on a given Purchase Date, the
     number of shares with respect to which options are to be exercised may
     exceed (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that were available for
     sale under the Plan on the Offering Date of the applicable Offering Period,
     or (ii) the number of shares available for sale under the Plan on such
     Purchase Date, the Board may in its sole discretion provide (x) that the
     company shall make a pro rata allocation of the Shares of Common Stock
     available for purchase on such Offering Date or Purchase Date, as
     applicable, in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall
     determine in its sole discretion to be equitable among all participants
     exercising options to purchase Common Stock on such Purchase Date, and
     continue all Offering Periods then in effect, or (y) that the company shall
     make a pro rata allocation of the sharees available for purchase on such
     Offering Date or Purchase Date, as applicable, in as uniform a manner as
     shall be practicable and as it shall determine in its sole discretion to be
     equitable among all participants exercising options to purchase Common
     Stock on such Purchase Date, and terminate any or all Offering Periods then
     in effect pursuant to Section 20 below. The company may make pro rata
     allocation of the Shares available on the Offering Date of any applicable
     Offering Period pursuant to the preceding sentence, notwithstanding any
     authorization of additional Shares for issuance under the Plan by the
     company's stockholders subsequent to such Offering Date.

     To record the due adoption of the foregoing amendment, Therma-Wave, Inc.
has caused the execution hereof by its duly authorized officer.

                                        Therma-Wave, Inc.

                                        By:/s/ L. Ray Christie
                                           -------------------
                                        Title: Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Secretary
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of Registrant

 

The followingsubsidiaries are direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Company:

 

AffinityAdvertising, LP, a Minnesota limited partnership

Affinity Brokerage, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

Affinity Group, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

Affinity Guest Services, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

Affinity Road and TravelClub, Inc., a Texas corporation

AGI Productions, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

ARU, Inc., aMinnesota corporation

Camp Coast to Coast, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

Camping Realty, Inc.,a Kentucky corporation

Camping World CardServices, Inc, an Ohio corporation

Camping World, Inc.,a Kentucky corporation

Camping World InsuranceServices of Kentucky, Inc., a Kentucky corporation

Camping World InsuranceServices of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation

Camping World InsuranceServices of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation

Coast Marketing Group, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

CWFR Capital Corp., aDelaware corporation

CWI, Inc., aKentucky corporation

CW Michigan, Inc., aDelaware corporation

Ehlert Publishing Group, Inc.,a Minnesota corporation

Golf Card InternationalCorp., a Delaware corporation

Golf Card Resort Services, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

GSS Enterprises, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

PowerSports Media, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

TL Enterprises, Inc.,a Delaware corporation

VBIInc., a Delaware corporation

 

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2000, of Southern California Edison Company into the
previously filed Registration Statements which follow:

    Registration Form      File No.       Effective Date
    -----------------      -------        --------------

       Form S-3            33-53288       November 6, 1992
       Form S-3            33-50251       September 21, 1993
       Form S-3            333-00497      February 2, 1996



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

May 11, 2000
#### R. G. DAWES, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 24066.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 21, 1948.

No appearance, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed at six years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and at his request the same is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5113 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5113

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a compound of strontium 
                        chloroapatite-europium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Huelskamp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a compound of strontium 
                        chloroapatite-europium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOUND OF STRONTIUM CHLOROAPATITE-EUROPIUM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.66 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to a compound of strontium 
chloroapatite-europium) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 11,457 | 10,992 | 10,243
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 9,508  | 9,860  | 9,724  | 9,553  | 9,387  | 9,337  | 10,509 | 10,494 | 10,104 | 10,091
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9,614  | 9,358  | 9,681  | 9,348  | 9,156  | 8,571  | 7,694  | 6,989  | 6,402  | 5,753 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,299  | 5,101  | 4,983  | 4,819  | 4,652  | 4,314  | 3,931  | 3,982  | 3,557  | 3,279 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,673  | 3,486  | 3,308  | 3,592  | 4,359  | 3,183  | 2,821  | 2,654  | 2,449  | 2,125 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,989  | 2,267  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
page 1 of 3

February 15, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Approved Exemption Request (#12837) Pursuant to Section 333 of the 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Remote Intelligence, LLC. (“RI”), pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) (“Section 333”), Subsection (f) of 49 U.S.C. § 44701, and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, was granted an exemption (#12837) from certain Federal Aviation Regulations 

(“FARs”). This exemption allows RI to conduct commercial operations with Prioria’s Maveric 

small Unmanned Aircraft System (“sUAS”) (the “Maveric”) and Prioria’s Hexacopter small 

Unmanned Aircraft System (the “Hex). Remote Intelligence is hereby requesting that our 

existing exemption be amended to allow 3 additional UAS types for improved safety and 

flexibility to meet our mission needs. We are requesting the addition of DJI’s Phantoms, DJI’s

Inspires, and Birds Eye Aero’s FireFly6.

UAS Weight Flight Configuration Estimated Flight Time

DJI Phantom < 3 lbs VTOL multirotor 25 minutes

DJI Inspire < 7 lbs VTOL multirotor 20 minutes

Birds Eye Aero FireFly6 < 9 lbs VTOL transitional wing 45 minutes

Pre- and post-flight inspections and systems checks will precede and follow each flight following 

a prescribed protocol. Test flights are conducted following any upgrades to system software, 

firmware, or hardware to ensure safety of operations. All 3 systems include GPS navigational 

aide and stabilization, remote monitoring of battery voltage and GPS signal, and automated

failsafes, including Return to Launch (RTL mode) on demand and as a loss-of-link failsafe. All 

three systems use well-tested control software from DJI or Pixhawk, are low in weight, and 

relatively slow in velocity, which will further enhance the safety of Remote Intelligence’s 

operations. 
page 2 of 3

Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant approval of the requested 

amendment without delay. 

Sincerely, 

J. Merlin Benner

Managing Partner

Remote Intelligence, LLC

953 Lake Road

Wellsboro, PA 16901
page 3 of 3

Phantom

Inspire

FireFly 6
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|California Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|California Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 103    | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 12     | 11     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 21. 1

Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2009 (1)



|                                            |  |                             
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                            |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers LLC                         |  | Delaware                    
|                                            | 
|Elastomers Holdings LLC                     |  | Delaware                    
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers U.S. LLC                    |  | Delaware                    
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Holdings B.V.               |  | The Netherlands             
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Belgium S.P.R.L.            |  | Belgium                     
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers do Brasil S.A.              |  | Brazil                      
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers France S.A.S.               |  | France                      
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers GmbH                        |  | Germany                     
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers International Limited       |  | United Kingdom              
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Italy S.R.L.                |  | Italy                       
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Japan Ltd.                  |  | Japan                       
|                                            | 
|KRATON JSR Elastomers KK                    |  | Japan                       
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers North East Europe           |  | Poland                      
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Nederland B.V.              |  | The Netherlands             
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Research B.V.               |  | The Netherlands             
|                                            | 
|KRATON Polymers Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                       
|                                            | 
|K.P. Global Holdings C.V.                   |  | Netherlands Antilles        





(1) Listing includes only doing business
names and does not include trade names.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BYRON SEABERRY DEXTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-2031

November 15, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Michael S. Williams, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

11300 ROSZELL HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-CV-0302-JKP

BLUE LOGIC CAPITAL, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff commenced this action on March 12, 2020, alleging diversity jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Pl.’s Orig. Compl. (ECF No. 1). Based on the jurisdictional allegations 

therein, it is apparent that Plaintiff has not properly alleged the citizenship of either party.

Plaintiff alleges that it “is a limited liability company, registered under the laws of Texas. 

Plaintiff’s principal place of business is located at 4127 Fossil Park, San Antonio, TX 78261-

3014.” Id. ¶ 1. It alleges that Defendant “is an Ohio limited liability company” and “Defendant’s 

principal place of business is located at 5000 Arlington Center Blvd., Upper Arlington, OH 

43220.” Id. ¶ 2. 

Plaintiff’s jurisdictional facts are insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction under § 

1332. “The citizenship of a limited partnership is based upon the citizenship of each of its partners.” Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d 1077, 1079 (5th Cir. 2008) (citing Carden v. 

Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990)). Similarly, in Harvey, the Fifth Circuit concluded 

that “like limited partnerships and other unincorporated associations or entities, the citizenship of 

a LLC is determined by the citizenship of all of its members.” Id. at 1080. For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of the parties in this case is not determined by their principle 

place of business or under which state’s law they are organized.
2

The Fifth Circuit has long held that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3), the federal courts 

“have the responsibility to consider the question of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte if it is 

not raised by the parties and to dismiss any action if such jurisdiction is lacking.” Giannakos v. 

M/V Bravo Trader, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1985). Rule 12(h)(3) provides in full: “If the 

court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the 

action.” 

Given the jurisdictional requirements of § 1332, the Court’s responsibility for determining the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, and the express direction of Rule 12(h)(3), the 

Court directs Plaintiff to cure the noted deficiencies in its jurisdictional facts by filing an 

Amended Complaint on or before April 20, 2020. 

SIGNED this 23rd day of March 2020.

JASON K. PULLIAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**Officer Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of theundersigned officers of SPS certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

| (1)    |   | The Form 10-Q fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    |   | The information contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of SPS as of the dates and  for the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q. |

 
| Date:  Aug. 4, 2008 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | /s/ DAVID L. EVES |
|                     | David L. Eves |
|                     | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |   |
|                     | /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE  III |
|                     | Benjamin G.S. Fowke III |
|                     | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to SPS and will be retained by SPS andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----