alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.4

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Hudbay Minerals Inc. (Hudbay or
the Registrant) is committed to the health and safety of its employees and to
providing an incident free workplace.

Hudbays U.S. mining operations
are subject to Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (the MSHA)
regulation under the U.S. Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the FMSH
Act). The MSHA inspects Hudbays mines on a regular basis and issues various
citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the FMSH
Act. Whenever the MSHA issues a citation or order, it also generally proposes a
civil penalty, or fine, related to the alleged violation.

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank
Act), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an
operator, of a coal or other mine are required to disclose in their periodic
reports filed with the Commission information regarding specified health and
safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions,
and mining-related fatalities. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,
the Registrants Rosemont Copper Project did not receive any citations or
ordersfrom the MSHA alleging violations specified by the Dodd-Frank Act.

In addition, as required by the
reporting requirements regarding mine safety included in section 1503(a)(2) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, for the year ended December 31, 2016, none of the mines
operated by Hudbay received written notice from the MSHA of (a) a pattern of
violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as
could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect
of mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of the FMSH Act or (b) the
potential to have such a pattern.

---
EXHIBIT 13.1



ORIGIN AGRITECH LIMITED



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned, William S. Niebur, Chief Executive Officer of Origin Agritech Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies,
to his knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 27, 2017





|/s/ William S. Niebur          | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: William S. Niebur        | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
with the Company’s Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6926

JERRY BAIG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CA-99-12-1)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Baig, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Baig appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Baig v. United States, No. CA-99-12-1 (N.D.W. Va. June 30, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                              
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. §1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HudBay Minerals Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David S. Bryson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

March 31, 2014

 

 
| /s/ David S. Bryson           |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| David S. Bryson               |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

 

----
February 2, 2015

Memorandum

Subject: Summary of Conference Call with Century Aluminum Representatives

From: Matt Hakos, RTI

To: David Putney, EPA/OAQPS

I. Purpose

The purpose of the call was to discuss provi sions of the Primary Aluminum Risk and Technology Review Supplemental Pr oposal related to PM, metallic HAP and POM primary potline

and anode bake furnace emission rates. Alternative emissions limits for anode bake furnaces were

also discussed.

II. Date and Time

The call was held February 02, 2015 between 11:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m.

III. Attendees

David Putney, EPA/OAQPS Chuck French, EPA/OAQPS David Green, RTI Matt Hakos, RTI Brandon Coomes, Century Aluminum Jamie Coomes, Century Aluminum

IV. Summary

A. Emission Rates used in MACT Floor Analysis are Misrepresented for the Primary Potline and

the Anode Bake Furnace

Brandon Coomes stated that the te st results submitted for the I CR were representative of an individual stack divided by the tota l aluminum capacity (for the pot line) and the total anode capacity (for the bake furnace). As such, primary potline PM , POM and metallic HAP emissions used in the MACT floor analysis and risk asse ssment are one fifth of their actu al values (control device has five stacks) and anode bake furnace PM and metallic HAP emissions used in the MACT floor analysis

and risk assessment are one third of their actual va lues (control device has 3 stacks). To correct for these errors, existing primary potline emission rate s should be multiplied by five and the existing anode bake furnace emission rates should be multiplied by three.

B. Alternative Emission Limits

Representatives also requested that the propos ed alternative emission limit methodology for cocontrolled new and existing anode bake furnaces be extended for use in PM limit determinations. Further information to be provided in comments.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-554-000]


Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC; Notice of Filing

September 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 20, 2000, Pine Needle LNG Company, 
LLC (Pine Needle) tendered for filing a motion that dealt with 
compliance with section 284.12(c)(3) of the Commission's regulations 
and certain Gas industry Board Standards. Pine Needle's filing also 
requested action with respect to Commission Order No. 587-L, which 
requires pipelines to permit shippers to offset imbalances of different 
contracts and to trade imbalances by November 1, 2000. Order No. 587-L 
also requires pipelines to file the necessary tariff changes no earlier 
than 60 days prior to November 1, 2000. The issues raised by Pine 
Needle in their September 20, 2000 filing regarding Commission Order 
No. 587-L will be addressed in the above-docketed proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (Call 202-208-2222 for asssistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24985 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Caballero, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Albert Williams, J.), rendered on August 15, 1988, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

*214Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit 21
  Name of Subsidiary
    
    Percent Ownership by RegistrantJAC Intermedco, Inc
    
    
    100
    %JAC Operations Inc.
    
    
    100
    %Johnstown America Corporation
    
    
    100
    %FreightCar Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %JAIX Leasing company
    
    
    100
    %JAC Patent Company
    
    
    100
    %FreightCar Roanoke, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %Titagarh FreightCar Private Limited , Inc.
    
    
    51
    %
  74
#### FOGERSON v. STATE.

No. 27083.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1954.

No attorney on' appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our- review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.
DELOITTE - TOUCHE LLP CONSENT



EXHIBIT 10.25

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-69077, No. 333-51091, No. 333-50895 and No. 333-17097 of DVI, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements No.
333-69083, No. 333-50837, No. 333-50695, No. 333-50693 and No. 333-50691 of DVI, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated August 10, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DVI, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Princeton, New Jersey


August 28, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meeting 
will convene in Stayton, Oregon on Monday, October 17, 2000. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:00 p.m., and will conclude at 
approximately 8:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the South Room of 
the Stayton Community Center; 400 West Virginia Street; Stayton, 
Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (P.L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. The tentative agenda includes:
    (1) Continuing issue development and describing the desired future 
condition of the SRA, and (3) discussing the City of Salem's proposal 
for a water quality monitoring gauging station.
    The public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 8:00 
p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the October 17 meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips at the 
address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips; 
Willamette National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, 
Mill City, OR 97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: September 26, 2000.
Randy Dunbar,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-25142 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25194]



[[Page 58825]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date and Time: November 6, 2000, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 360, Arlington, Virginia 
22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Richard J. Fragaszy, Program Director, 
Geomechanics and Geotechnical Systems, Division of Civil and 
Mechanical Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8360.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 CAREER 
Geotech Review Panel as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25194 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M