alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 57637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23008]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8028]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``City of Gold: Tomb and Temple in Ancient Cyprus''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``City of Gold: Tomb and Temple in Ancient 
Cyprus,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Princeton University Art Museum, Princeton, New Jersey, from on or 
about October 20, 2012, until on or about January 20, 2013, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 11, 2012.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-23008 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                         
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

PARKERVISION, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00108-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE REGARDING AGREED AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER 

Pursuant to the Court’s Amended Standing Order Regarding Joint or Unopposed Request 

to Change Deadlines dated March 7, 2022, Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) hereby provides 

notice that the parties have agreed to amend the August 1, 2022 Amended Scheduling Order DE 

150 to extend the deadline for exchanging Rebuttal Expert Reports from September 30, 2022 to 

October 7, 2022. 

 

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 165 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 3
2 

Dated: September 16, 2022 

Michael J. Summersgill (pro hac vice) 

Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice) 

Marissa A. Lalli (pro hac vice) 

Samuel C. Leifer (pro hac vice) 

Alicia Coneys (pro hac vice) 

Harry Hanson (pro hac vice filed) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

 AND DORR LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Tel: (617) 526-6000 

Email: michael.summersgill@wilmerhale.com 

Email: sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com 

Email: marissa.lalli@wilmerhale.com 

Email: samuel.leifer@wilmerhale.com 

Email: alicia.coneys@wilmerhale.com 

Email: harry.hanson@wilmerhale.com 

Mary V. Sooter (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

 AND DORR LLP 

1225 17th Street, Suite 2600 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

Tel: (720) 274-3164 

Fax: (720) 274-3133 

Email: mindy.sooter@wilmerhale.com 

Todd Zubler (pro hac vice) 

Isley M. Gostin (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

 AND DORR LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Tel: (202) 663-6000 

Email: todd.zubler@wilmerhale.com 

Email: isley.gostin@wilmerhale.com 

Jason F. Choy (pro hac vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

 AND DORR LLP 

350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Tel: (213) 443-5300 

Email: jason.choy@wilmerhale.com

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ J. Stephen Ravel 

J. Stephen Ravel 

Texas State Bar No. 16584975 

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 

303 Colorado, Suite 2000 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 495-6429 

Email: steve.ravel@kellyhart.com 

James E. Wren 

Texas State Bar No. 22018200 

One Bear Place, Unit 97288 

Waco, Texas 76798 

Tel: (254) 710-7670 

Email: james.wren@baylor.edu 

Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 165 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on September 16, 2022. 

 /s/ J. Stephen Ravel 

 J. Stephen Ravel 

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 165 Filed 09/16/22 Page 3 of 3
Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal Aviation ECi Cylinder Administration

Airworthiness 

Directive

Introduction

NTSB

Fran Cox, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate

June 9, 2015
Federal Aviation

Administration

NTSB / FAA Meeting

• Thank you; dialogue with the NTSB is 

overdue.

 Delayed by defining where ex parte begins.

• Opportunity to resolve differences between 

NTSB recommendations & FAA compliance.

• Hopefully, we find agreement...

 ... or at least an understanding of our decisions.

• Post-meeting: Federal docket upload of 

meeting presentations and results.

NTSB meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 2
Federal Aviation

Administration

NTSB / FAA Meeting

FAA’s presentation topics:

• Background

 Timeline and fundamental information.

• Comparison of recommendations

 ECi / NTSB / FAA recommendations.

• FAA Challenge Team findings

 Risk analysis and resulting compliance plan.

• Going forward

 Identify areas of NTSB and FAA agreement.

NTSB meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning the individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Dates:*                         October 25, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6700-B Rockledge Drive, Room 1205, Bethesda, MD 20892-7612.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paula S. Strickland, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, NIH, Solar Building, Room 4C02, 6003 Executive Boulevard MSC 7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-402-0643.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 20, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-25159 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### PENA v. STATE.

No. 24494.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1949.

Archer, San Miguel & Cadena, San Antonio, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant is charged by complaint with unlawfully operating “ * * * a motor vehicle, to-wit: an automobile upon a public highway . * * The case was tried to the court, without a jury, who assessed a fine of $50.

Only one witness, a policeman, testified in the case. In the evening, after dark, he received a call to go to the 300 block of South Flores Street, to the scene of an accident. When he arrived he found a truck had run into the rear end of another truck parked along the street. The driver of the truck was not there but returned in about ten minutes. Appellant told the witness his name and that he was from Lorenzo, Texas; that he had just bought the truck.

From his observation, the witness concluded that appellant was drunk. Appellant stated that he had drunk some seven or eight beers. The officer took him in his scout car and engaged him in conversation on the way to headquarters. The witness did not know when the accident had happened; he did not ask appellant where he had been/but inquired only about his drinking. This is all of the evidence in the case and we-think it is insufficient to support a conviction. Given its *most*strict construction, and assuming that he stated an offense had been committed, it is only the extrajudicial confession of the accused. This will not support conviction in the absence of proof of the corpus delicti. See Livingston v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 437, 112 S.W.2d 190; Vasquez v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 376, 167 S.W.2d 1030; and Robinson v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 439, 188 S.W.2d 182.

The appellant has raised another question in his brief. He claims there is a variance between the evidence and the proof. In the absence of sufficient evidence to malee a case, it will not be necessary to discuss that issue.

For the failure of the eyidence to establish the corpus delicti, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 20     | 215    | 26     | 19     | 104    | 503    | 740    | 4,601  | 2,694 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 668    | 7,855  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 31.1



PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Gary Vogel, certify that:





|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2016; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|April 29, 2016 |  | /s/Gary Vogel           | 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|               |  | Gary Vogel              | 
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

ACKERMAN MCQUEEN, INC.; 

MERCURY GROUP, INC.; HENRY 

MARTIN; WILLIAM WINKLER; 

MELANIE MONTGOMERY; AND 

JESSE GREENBERG, 

MOVANTS, 

V. 

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF 

AMERICA AND WAYNE LAPIERRE, 

RESPONDENTS. 

ZU2UFEB 10 PM 14:148 

CAUSE NO. 1 :20-MC-149-LY 

(CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-2074-G, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS) 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Third Party Subpoena filed February 

7, 2020 (Doe. #1) is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Susan Hightower for resolution 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of 

Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, 

as amended.. 

SIGNED this /24j.. day of February, 2020. 

UNI ED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-mc-00149-LY Document 2 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4706 

To extend and modify the reduction of duty on Mandipropamid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the reduction of duty on 

Mandipropamid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANDIPROPAMID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Mandipropamid) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.2%’’ and inserting ‘‘1.4%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4706 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Moses SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee (two cases).

Nos. 27155, 27156.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

-Nov. 10, 1954. .

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense'is th'e unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, a fine' of $200.

The record is before us without- a state-' ment of facts or bills of exception: ’ .

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for. our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 31,849 | 29,914 | 28,186 | 27,586 | 28,813 | 29,518 | 29,419 | 29,011 | 27,426 | 26,598
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 27,467 | 27,640 | 25,862 | 23,033 | 19,747 | 18,252 | 15,750 | 14,813 | 13,892 | 12,856
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12,120 | 10,820 | 9,853  | 8,567  | 8,968  | 7,633  | 6,564  | 6,472  | 6,847  | 6,056 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,654  | 4,946  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

JESSE SANTOS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 1:20-CV-190-RP

§

CAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

On March 23, 2020, Jesse Santos (“Plaintiff”) dismissed all claims in this case without 

prejudice. (Dkt. 6). Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action without a 

court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion 

for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant Car Financial Services has not 

served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s notice is therefore “self-effectuating 

and terminates the case in and of itself; no order or other action of the district court is required.” In 

re Amerijet Int’l, Inc., 785 F.3d 967, 973 (5th Cir. 2015), as revised (May 15, 2015). 

As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. 

 SIGNED on March 24, 2020.

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00190-RP Document 7 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 1