alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 13     | 10     | 13     | 24     | 6      | 17     | 17     | 14     | 12    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 21     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00142

- CR

JIMMY PORTER v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. S

- 19

- 3413CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 26 , 2021
An equal opportunity employer 1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White

Washington, DC 20005

- 4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202

- 682

- 8344

Fax 202

- 682

- 8270

whiter@api.org

Nov ember 15 , 2012

Byron J. Bunker,

Division Director

Compliance Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality US Environmental Protection Agency

2000 Traverwood Drive

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation:

Confidential Information in Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate : Embryo

- Fetal

Toxicity Study in Rats by Inhalation Exposure (Study No. 05

- 4287)

Dear Mr. Bunker :

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG),

is submitting the following clarification for the above captioned report. The report does not

contain any confidential business information and can be posted to the 211b docket for public

viewing.

The word “Confidential” on p age 177 of the report is on a copy of test results eva luating the

sterility of animal bedding used at the performing laboratory (Huntingdon Life Science) during

this study. The sterility testing was conducted by NAMSA who issued the report to Huntingdon

Life Sciences. By including that NAMSA document in the draft embryo

- fetal toxic ity study report

and sending it to the RG, the findings reported by NAMSA are no longer confidential.

I f you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please

contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
EXHIBIT 23.3

Consent of Thom Seal

Reference is
made to the Annual Report of Midway Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010 (the Annual
Report).

I hereby
consent to the references to my name under the heading Description of
Properties  Golden Eagle Property  Mineral Resources in the Annual Report
which the Company used, or directly quoted from, in preparing summaries
concerning the Companys mineral resources which appear in such Annual Report
and the incorporation therein of such references to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-148796)

|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Thom Seal                | 
|                               | 
|Thom Seal                      | 
|Differential
 Engineering Inc. | 
|                               | 
|March 30,
 2010                | 















77

---
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                      
|No chart available.                                                      
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 10.27
  
   1.
    
    
    Position:
    
    Executive Vice President and President, US Peripheral Vascular2.
    
    
    Reporting to:
    
    Robert J. Palmisano, President and Chief Executive Officer3.
    
    
    Effective Date:
    
    December 4, 20084.
    
    
    Base Salary:
    
    $356,000annual salary, less withholdings for Federal, FICA and State
taxes, in accordance with ev3s normal payroll procedures. You will receive a salary and
performance review effective January 1, 2010.5.
    
    
    Annual Bonus:
    
    You will be entitled to earn an annual target incentive bonus of up to
65% of your annual base salary, based upon the achievement of performance objectives set
by the Compensation Committee of ev3s Board of Directors or the Board. Your 2008
Incentive bonus will be prorated to reflect your new responsibilities.6.
    
    
    Additional Equity:
    
    Equity compensation is a planned part of our overall compensation
philosophy. ev3s equity program has been established to commensurate with an employees
level within the organization. Subject to BOD approval and as Executive Vice President
and President Peripheral Vascular you will receive 38,550 restricted shares and 96, 350
options at the fair market value on the date of the grant by the Board of Directors.
 Greg Morrison, Senior
Vice President, Human Resources.
 Sincerely,
    
    Agreed,/s/ Greg MorrisonGreg Morrison
    
    /s/ Stacy Enxing SengSr. Vice President
    
    Stacy Enxing Seng                         DateHuman Resources
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chate Singh, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx *306County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered March 29, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

An argument at a wedding party erupted into a fight, in the course of which the defendant slashed the complainant with a knife. The wound required 175 staples or stitches for closure, and resulted in serious and protracted disfigurement. Five witnesses, including one of the defendant’s brothers, saw the fight, and three of those witnesses saw the defendant cut the complainant.

The purported errors committed by the prosecutor during cross-examination of Yudhisthir Mangal and during summation are conceded not to have been preserved by objection. With respect to defendant’s argument that the prosecutor committed error in asking defendant’s brother Mohan Man-gal, "Isn’t it true that you participated in the assault upon [the complainant]?”, there was neither an objection nor a motion for a mistrial on the ground that the prosecutor was asking the question without a good-faith basis. Accordingly, that issue has been waived *(People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641; *People v Weston,*56 NY2d 844). We decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice. If the issue had been preserved by timely review, we would find it without merit in view of overwhelming evidence that defendant attacked the complainant, aided by defendant’s brothers. Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56874-56875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22712]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

[Docket No. 2011-10]

Extension of Comment Period: Remedies for Small Copyright Claims: 
Additional Comments

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is extending the period of public comment 
in response to its August 23, 2012 Notice of Inquiry requesting 
additional comments regarding issues relating to remedies for small 
copyright claims.

DATES: Comments are due October 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: All comments and reply comments shall be submitted 
electronically. A comment page containing a comment form is posted on 
the Office Web site at http://www.copyright.gov/docs/smallclaims. The 
Web site interface requires commenting parties to complete a form 
specifying name and organization, as applicable, and to upload comments 
as an attachment via a browser button. To meet accessibility standards, 
commenting parties must upload comments in a single file not to exceed 
six megabytes (MB) in one of the following formats: The Adobe Portable 
Document File (PDF) format that contains searchable, accessible text 
(not an image); Microsoft Word;

[[Page 56875]]

WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or ASCII text file format (not a 
scanned document). The form and face of the comments must include both 
the name of the submitter and organization. The Office will post the 
comments publicly on the Office's Web site exactly as they are 
received, along with names and organizations. If electronic submission 
of comments is not feasible, please contact the Office at 202-707-8350 
for special instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Charlesworth, Senior 
Counsel, Office of the Register, by email at jcharlesworth@loc.gov or 
by telephone at 202-707-8350; or Catherine Rowland, Senior Counsel, 
Office of Policy and International Affairs, by email at 
crowland@loc.gov or by telephone at 202-707-8350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 23, 2012, the Copyright Office 
published a Notice of Inquiry inviting additional public comments on 
remedies for small copyright claims. Due to the number and complexity 
of the issues raised in that Notice, it appears that some stakeholders 
may need additional time to respond. In order to facilitate full and 
adequate public comment, the Office hereby extends the time for filing 
additional comments to October 19, 2012.

    Dated: September 11, 2012.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2012-22712 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
```
#### Edward A. Gormel, Appellant, v Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: " 'Resettlement’ connotes the revising of the order to make it respond to the decision” (Siegel, NY Prac § 250, at 308). "Resettlement of an order is a procedure designed solely to correct errors or omissions as to form, or for clarification. It may not be used to effect a substantive change in or to amplify the prior decision of the court” *(Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558, 566; *see also, Wilcox v County of Onondaga,*132 AD2d 984). Here, pursuant to defendant’s motion to resettle an order in a declaratory judgment action, the court determined the method by which plaintiff must exercise his options to purchase additional life insurance. That was error. Because that issue was not litigated in the original declaratory judgment action, it was not properly determined on a motion to resettle. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—enforce prior judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

            Re:   Fremont Home Loan Trust, Series 2005-1
                  Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-1
                  ----------------------------------------

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing Distribution Date reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Financial Asset
Securities Corp. (the "Registrant");

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be
provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement is included in these reports;

            4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and based upon the review
required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in
the report, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement; and

            5. I have disclosed to the Registrant's certified public accountants
all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
standard as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

            Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated March 1, 2005
(the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among the Registrant as Depositor,
Litton Loan Servicing L.P. as servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as trustee.

                                          FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                          By:    /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                                 ------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert McGinnis
                                          Title: President
                                          Date:  March 30, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Melanie Young, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IDI Global,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                  /s/ Melanie Young
Date: August 14, 2003             __________________________________________
                                  Melanie Young, Principal Financial Officer
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2011-1258 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-184-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate 

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

Learjet Melissa Arndt, Gary 

Carson

9/1/11 Concur.

Learjet Carol Evans 8/24/11 Concur.

Learjet Carol Evans 5/9/11 Concur.

Learjet Carol Evans, Rex 

Williams

4/20/11 Concur.

Carol Evans, Rex 

Williams

4/26/11

Learjet Kirc Harris 7/12/11 Concur.

Learjet Kirc Harris 4/21/11 Concur.

Learjet Kirc Harris 4/20/11 Concur.

Learjet Kirc Harris 5/6/11 Concur.

Learjet Kirc Harris 11/29/10 Concur.

Other/Additional Information: