alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 29-December 1, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rooms 320, 330, and 365, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Lockhart, Program Director, Room 1025 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8870.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Focused Research Group Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: September 27, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25196 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Plourde, Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 30, 2016





/s/  John Plourde

John Plourde,

President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls
over financial reporting.
 Date: December 27, 2007
    /s/ John KingsburyJohn Kingsbury, Treasurer (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         | 46,803  | 46,620 |        |         |        | 44,319 | 42,192  | 41,404  | 41,554 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 41,411  | 39,288  | 38,141 | 37,847 | 39,020  | 39,736 | 41,592 | 41,108  | 40,793  | 43,350 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 45,419  | 46,462  | 47,491 | 48,717 | 53,275  | 60,178 | 65,805 | 76,357  | 81,843  | 85,034 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 94,287  | 104,454 | 93,475 | 97,921 | 105,955 | 85,315 | 88,312 | 115,249 | 138,198 | 126,140
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 114,732 | 149,062 |        |        |         |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04081]


Mountaineer Precision Tool & Mold, Inc., Waynesville, North 
Carolina; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
August 15, 2000 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Mountaineer Precision Tool & Mold, Inc., Waynesville, North Carolina.
    In a letter dated September 12, 2000, the NAFTA-TAA Coordinator in 
North Carolina requested that the investigation of the NAFTA-TAA 
petition be terminated based on the inability of the State agency to 
obtain any information in the case.
    Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of September, 2000.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-25064 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Donald Penoyer, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Laverne Penoyer, et al., Appellants, v Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Order *916unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff Láveme Penoyer suffers from serious brain impairment as a result of contracting viral herpes simplex encephalitis, a central nervous system infection. Her physician determined that she should reside in a residential setting with 24-hour-per-day skilled nursing care. Her psychiatrist issued a treatment plan identical to that of her physician.

Plaintiff is covered by a major medical expense policy issued by defendant which defines covered charges as: "those charges necessary for the treatment of a sickness or injury actually made to you or your dependents on account of such accident or sickness. The charges must be reasonable and commensurate with the prices generally charged and the services and supplies generally furnished in the area concerned. They must be incurred upon the order of a physician and must be charges of the kind set forth and to the extent specified below * * * [dj * * * private duty nursing care rendered by a nurse in or out of the hospital.” After initially covering the cost of plaintiff’s 24-hour-per-day skilled nursing care under its major medical expense policy, defendant refused coverage for these services rendered to plaintiff after June 27, 1989, on the ground that her circumstances did not require skilled nursing care.

Plaintiff commenced this breach of contract action, then moved for summary judgment arguing that defendant is required to pay for skilled nursing care as a matter of law. The court denied the motion, finding that there existed a question of fact whether the charges incurred were reasonably and objectively necessary. This was error.

We find the facts of this case indistinguishable from those in *Little v Blue Cross*(72 AD2d 200). In *Little,*the policy provided coverage for private-duty nursing care when it was "required” and ordered by a physician. We rejected the insurer’s argument that this policy language gave the company the right to make an independent determination of whether the nursing care was required, holding that "[s]uch interpretation of the paragraph would render it impossible for an insured to know whether the policy gave him the right to such services upon certification of need by his doctor” unless he sought prior approval from the insurer; however, the policy contained no such precondition *(Little v Blue Cross, supra,*at 203). We further held that the insurer was "bound by the good faith certification by the insured’s doctor of the insured’s need of such nursing services” *(Little v Blue Cross, supra,*at 204). *917Here, the policy contains no such precondition and we hold that defendant is likewise bound. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report ofStoneleigh Realty Investors, LLLP (f/k/a SEI Holdings, Inc.)on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SEI
Holdings, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 20, 2012 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                         |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Annual Report ofStoneleigh Realty
Investors, LLLP (f/k/a SEI Holdings, Inc.)on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2011, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of SEI Holdings, Inc.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 20, 2012 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                         |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Hawaii District Advisory Council, will hold a public meeting at 10 a.m. on Wednesday October 11, 2000 located at the Business Information and Counseling Center, 1111 Bishop Street, Suite 204, Training Center, Honolulu, HI to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. For further information write or call Andrew K. Poepoe, District Director U.S. Small Business Administration, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 2-235, Honolulu, Hawaii (808) 541-2965. 

Bettie Baca, 

Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-25186 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4856 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethene, 

oxidized, polymerized. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,1,2-2- 

Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, polymerized. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,1,2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHENE, OXIDIZED, PO4 LYMERIZED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.14 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, polymerized) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4856 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4984 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4984

  To suspend temporarily the duty on knit tank tops of stretch fabric 
 with textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into or attached to the 
fabric and that incorporate connectors designed to secure an electronic 
     transmitter that transmits physiological information from the 
                  electrodes to a compatible monitor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on knit tank tops of stretch fabric 
 with textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into or attached to the 
fabric and that incorporate connectors designed to secure an electronic 
     transmitter that transmits physiological information from the 
                  electrodes to a compatible monitor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KNIT TANK TOPS OF STRETCH FABRIC WITH TEXTILE OR POLYMER-
              BASED ELECTRODES KNIT INTO OR ATTACHED TO THE FABRIC AND 
              THAT INCORPORATE CONNECTORS DESIGNED TO SECURE AN 
              ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTER THAT TRANSMITS PHYSIOLOGICAL 
              INFORMATION FROM THE ELECTRODES TO A COMPATIBLE MONITOR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Knit tank tops of   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          stretch fabric                                                    12/31/2015
                          with textile or
                          polymerbased
                          electrodes knit
                          into or attached
                          to the fabric and
                          that incorporate
                          connectors
                          designed to
                          secure an
                          electronic
                          transmitter that
                          transmits
                          physiological
                          information from
                          the electrodes to
                          a compatible
                          monitor (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6109.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenrick Richardson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Doolittle, J.), rendered January 12, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (six counts) and attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. *562The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Santagata, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence presented to the hearing court clearly demonstrated that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant (GPL 140.10 [1] [b]). The investigating officers were provided with factual information concerning the defendant’s possession of a stolen silver tea set and a large amount of assorted property which would lead a reasonable person possessing the officers’ expertise to conclude that an offense had been committed and that the defendant was the perpetrator *(People v White,*117 AD2d 127, 131; *cf., People v Dawkins,*163 AD2d 322). Probable cause for a warrantless arrest may be provided, in whole or in part, through hearsay information *(People v Johnson,*66 NY2d 398). The correlation between the information known to the police and that discovered through the informants’ statements was sufficient to satisfy the officers of their reliability *(People v Crayon,*139 AD2d 840; *People v Rodriguez,*52 NY2d 483). The arresting officer who received this information in the field was entitled to presume that it was reliable *(People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408, 416).

The defendant’s assertion that his pretrial motion to sever the charges against him was improperly denied is without merit. Consolidation of the charges pursuant to GPL 200.20 (2) (b) was proper *(see, People v Diaz,*122 AD2d 279; *People v Lane,*56 NY2d 1).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.