alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4919 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4919

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Para-methoxyphenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Para-methoxyphenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARA-METHOXYPHENOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Para-methoxyphenol  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          or hydroquinone                                                   12/31/2015
                          monomethylether
                          (CAS No. 150-76-
                          5) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2909.50.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4928 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men’s 

footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. HARRIS (for himself and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain men’s footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.77 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain men’s footwear with outer soles and uppers of rub7 bers or plastics) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$20/pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$24/ 

9 pair’’; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4928 IH

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Royal Insurance Company of America, Appellant, v Ralph L. Vinciguerra, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and *874petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner applied to stay arbitration of its insured’s claim for underinsurance benefits, contending that the insured never purchased underinsured motorist’s protection *(see,*Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]). Supreme Court denied the motion, holding that, because the declarations page of the policy did not set forth a per person limit for uninsured motorist protection and set forth only a per accident limit of $20,000, the insured had underinsurance to the extent of $10,000.

Supplementary uninsured motorist’s insurance, or underinsurance, is not a mandated coverage for all automobile policies; the insured must opt to purchase it *(see,*Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]; *Reichel v Government Employees Ins. Co.,*66 NY2d 1000; *Matter of Maryland Cas. Co. v Hopkins,*142 AD2d 946, *lv denied*73 NY2d 702; *Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Villarrubia,*119 AD2d 576; *Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. [Miller],*111 AD2d 438). The insured has not claimed or demonstrated that he paid a premium for that additional coverage. The sole basis for the insured’s assertion of underinsurance coverage is the absence of any limit on per person uninsured motorist coverage. The insured, relying upon *Morris v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.*(662 F Supp 1489), contends that, in the absence of a limitation, he had per person coverage of $20,000, which exceeds the statutory *maximum*for uninsured motorist protection *(see,*Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [1]). In our view, *Morris*does not support the insured’s contention. The declarations page of the policy in *Morris*expressly provided "uninsured” coverage of $100,000/ $300,000. That coverage clearly exceeded the maximum allowed for uninsured motorist protection and supported a finding that the insured obtained underinsurance. In the subject case, however, the declarations page expressly limits uninsured motorist protection coverage to $20,000 per accident, which complies with the mandate of subdivision (f) (1) of section 3420 of the Insurance Law. There is no basis for drawing an inference from the declarations page that the insured purchased additional underinsurance protection *(see, Matter of Maryland Cas. Co. v Hopkins, supra; Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Villarrubia, supra).*Moreover, the subject policy does not include a supplementary uninsured motorist’s insurance indorsement *(see, Terwilliger v American Motorists Ins. Co.,*156 AD2d 805, 806). In sum, respondent did not obtain underinsurance coverage, there is no agreement to arbitrate a claim for underinsurance benefits, and the petition for a stay of arbitration should have been *875granted *(see, Matter of Maryland Cas. Co. v Hopkins, supra).*(Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.—arbitration.) *Present—Denman, J.*P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
----

Action brought on 3 November 2005 — ARCHI.M.E.D.-E.S v Commission

(Case T-397/05)

(2006/C 74/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Architecture, Microclimat, Energies Douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ARCHI.M.E.D.-E.S) (Ganges, France) (represented by: P.-P. van Gehuchten, J. Sambon, P. Reyniers, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is party to Contract BU 209-95 concluded with the Commission in consequence of the invitation to tender in connection with the specific programme for research and technological development in the field of non-nuclear energy (1) and covering the execution of a project of renovation of a building in Lyon by using solar and bio-climatic architecture methods. The contract contains an arbitration clause under which the Community judicature has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between the contracting parties as regards the validity, application and interpretation of the contract.

In execution of its contractual obligations, the applicant, on 12 December 2001, sent the Commission the final report on the project. The Commission did not accept that report and on 5 July 2002 served on the applicant a decision to recover payments made by refusing to accept certain costs declared by it in that report. Neither exchanges of correspondence between the parties, nor the meetings held, nor the intervention of a mediator could bring about an amicable settlement of the dispute. By registered letter of 30 August 2005, the Commission served the applicant with a final recovery decision preceded by a debit note of 23 August 2005. That decision is the subject of this action brought by the applicant on the basis of the arbitration clause.

The action seeks, principally, an order that the Commission pay 20 % of the balance of the subsidy allegedly due to the applicant under Contract BU 209-95.

In support of its claims, the applicant argues that any disagreement with the way the project was executed by the contracting parties should have been expressed by the Commission before the date on which the report was presumed to have been approved (two months from the date of deposit of the final report). In the applicant's view, the Commission is time-barred and cannot therefore constitute itself a creditor of the applicant. Consequently, being time-barred, the Commission remains indebted to the applicant for the balance of the subsidy which it undertook to pay under the contract in question.

----

(1)  Programme put in place by Council Decision 94/806/EC of 23 November 1994 (OJ L 334 of 22 December 1994, p. 87).

----
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------

<PAGE>

                                 CERTIFICATION

          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2005-2;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

          Date: March 27, 2006

                                       /s/ Steve Bailey
                                       ----------------
                                       Steve Bailey
                                       Senior Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patents for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: Army Research Laboratory, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially 
exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned 
to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the 
Army, Washington, D.C.
    These patents cover a wide variety of technical arts including: An 
apparatus for determining the thickness of a wall or coal seam and a 
traveling array antenna, which operates at microwave/millimeter 
frequencies.
    Under the authority of section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed 
below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to 
any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or 
processes covered by this patent.
    Title: High Performance Traveling Wave Antenna for Microwave and 
Millimeter Wave Applications.
    Inventors: Thomas Koscica and Duc Huynh.
    Patent Number: 6,094,172.
    Issued Date: July 25, 2000.

    Title: Acoustic Navigation Aid for Autonomous Coal Miner.
    Inventors: Donald E. Wortman and John D. Bruno.
    Patent Number: 6,094,986.
    Issued Date: August 1, 2000.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norma Cammaratta, Technology Transfer 
Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-
1197 tel: (301) 394-2952; fax: (301) 394-5818.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25069 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4640 

To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Phenylphenol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALTMIRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Phenylphenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-PHENYLPHENOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Phenylphenol) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and income statements for the thirteen week period ended May 2, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                          34,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,646,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,208,864
<PP&E>                                       6,656,849
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,456,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,495,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,867,480
<BONDS>                                      3,354,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       299,778
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,060,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,495,471
<SALES>                                      4,872,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,872,686
<CGS>                                        3,606,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,606,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,486
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All numbers except EPS are in (000's)
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 91     | 97     | 98     | 85     | 101    | 140    | 139    | 167   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 199    | 192    | 184    | 148    | 155    | 123    | 125    | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-042:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6803

LARRY HENDRIX,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-98-170-AW)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Hendrix, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Hendrix v. Maryland Corr. Training Ctr., No.

CA-98-170-AW (D. Md. May 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Willamette Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Action of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Willamette Province Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on 
Thursday, October 19, 2000. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 
a.m., and will conclude at approximately 3 p.m. The meeting will be 
held at the Salem Office of the Bureau of Land Management; 1717 Fabry 
Road SE; Salem, Oregon; (503) 375-5646. The tentative agenda includes:
    (1) Presentation of Integrated Natural Fuels Assessment, (2) 
Overview of President's Wildfire Action Plan, (3) County receipts 
legislation, (4) REO update, (5) Update on PAC rechartering and 
membership, (6) Roundtable information sharing.
    The Public Forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. 
Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3-4 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits for the Public Forum. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the October 19 meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Neal Forrester at the 
address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Neal Forrester; 
Williamette National Forest; 211 East Seventh Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 
97401; (541) 465-6924.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
Darrel L. Kenops,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-25141 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M