alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion
Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i.) the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 26, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 2, 2011



/s/     RANDY W.
FURRRandy W. Furr Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5027 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixed isomers of 1,3– 

dichloropropene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixed 

isomers of 1,3–dichloropropene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXED ISOMERS OF 1,3–DICHLOROPROPENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.93 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 mixed isomers of 1,3–dichloropropene) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5027 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

City Of Austin, City of San Marcos, Travis

County, Hays County, Barton Springs

Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Larry

Becker, Arlene Becker, Jonna Murchison,

Mark Weiler

vs.

Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, LLC, Permian

Highway Pipeline, LLC, United States

Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, Aurelia Skipwith

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

AU:20-CV-00138-RP

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

HEARING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER in Courtroom 4,

on the Fifth Floor, United States Courthouse, 501 West Fifth Street, Austin, TX, on Friday,

February 14, 2020 at 02:00 PM. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of February, 2020.

______________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00138-RP Document 26 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solitron Devices, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shevach
Saraf, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to
my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



July 19, 2005                                 /s/ Shevach Saraf
                                            ----------------------
                                            Shevach Saraf
                                            Chairman, President,
                                            Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 657   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 105    | 233    | -516   | -70    | 261    | 829    | 747    | -245   | -230   | -692  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -208   | 208    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00108-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DISCOVERY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Zoomoom on February 10, 2022 at 02:00 PM.

set

IT 4th day of February, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 106 Filed 02/04/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24556]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1008 of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(I)), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
regulation under Section 1002(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Section 1301.34 of Title 21, Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby given that on June 19, 
2000, Abbott Laboratories, 1776 North Centennial Drive, McPherson, 
Kansas 67460-1247, made application to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration to be registered as an importer of remifentanil (9739), 
a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to import the remifentanil to manufacture Ultiva for 
the U.S. market.
    Any manufacturer holding, or applying for, registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of this basic class of controlled substance may file 
written comments on or objections to the application described above 
and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such 
application in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.43 in such form as 
prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United 
States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA 
Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than 
October 25, 2000.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and 
independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), 
(e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745-46 
(September 23, 1975), all applicants for registration to import a basic 
class of any controlled substance in Schedule I or II are and will 
continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f) are satisifed.

    Dated: September 8, 2000.
John H. King,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-24556 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4989 

To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer parts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer 

parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BICYCLE SPEEDOMETER PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Bicycle speedometer parts 

(provided for in subheading 9029.90.40) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4989 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 24854.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in the County Court at Law of Travis County by complaint and information with the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon -a public street while he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He plead not guilty to such charge, but was found guilty by a jury and his penalty assessed at a fine of fifty dollars, from which judgment this appeal is perfected.

Neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions are brought forward in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan T. Awde, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Jonathan T. AwdeName:
Jonathan T. AwdeTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:
April 29, 2015





The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### PETER THERKELDSEN v. THOMAS DORFNER.1

June 9, 1911.

Nos. 17,142—(142).

Defective assignment of error.

The general assignment that errors of law were committed by the trial court presents no particular ruling for review. [Reporter.]

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $483 for conversion. The case was tried before Iíanft, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.

Affirmed.

*B. F. Latta,*for appellant.

O. *É. Holman,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 131 N. W. 481.

Pee Cubiam.

The assignments of error, though insufficient, are construed as presenting the sole question whether the evidence supports the findings and decision of the trial •court. We have examined the record, and find therein evidence amply sufficient to sustain the findings, and therefore affirm the order appealed from. The general assignment that errors of law were committed by the trial court presents no particular ruling for review. Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey, 70 Minn. 507, 73 N. W. 406, 510.

Order affirmed.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 758    | 888    | 686    | 513    | 592    | 378    | 738    | 1,651  | 1,287  | 103   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 847    | 5,552  | 285    | 1,425  | 4,523  | 476    | 3,415  | 3,115  | 1,577  | 7,156 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,138  | 13,277 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                      
|Alaska Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                      
|Alaska Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 91     | 44     | 131    | 60    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 94     | 101    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Martha Melohn, as Trustee, Appellant, v Henry N. Beard, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Santaella, J.), entered on March 19, 1990, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and as a matter of discretion, and the motion granted, without costs.

Plaintiff-appellant, in her representative capacity as a trustee, is the owner of a building in which defendant-respondent is a tenant. The action was initially brought seeking a declaration of the landlord’s right of access to install new windows. The action has been discontinued with respect to all tenants other than defendant-respondent Henry N. Beard, who has asserted numerous counterclaims.

Defendant noticed plaintiffs deposition and she then sought a protective order on the ground that she had no knowledge relevant to defendant’s counterclaims, and that her managing agent should be deposed in her stead. The court denied the motion and the deposition proceeded. After an hour and a half of questioning, the deposition was discontinued because plaintiff complained of an attack of high blood pressure and colitis. The record contains unrefuted medical evidence of her condition.

Under the circumstances, the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the protective order, especially inasmuch as plaintiff had offered to produce a nonparty witness with knowledge, and the testimony elicited from plaintiff was of no evidentiary value. (CPLR 3103; *see, Verini v Bochetto,*49 AD2d 752.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on High Energy 
Laser Weapon Systems Applications will meet in closed session on 
October 19-20, 2000, at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22201.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Task Force will review on-going or proposed programs in 
high energy laser (HEL) applications; examine recent supporting 
technology advancements and their applications with respect to 
supporting military HEL weapon system developments; develop potential 
military and strategic HEL system applications and identify processes 
required to implement these potentials; determine what needs to be done 
to ``weaponize'' these systems; and assess HEL operational concepts, 
impacts and limitations, considering legal, treaty and policy issues 
concerning HEL employment.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly 
these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-25100 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```