# The Attorney General of Texas

March 6, 1981 MARK WHITE Attorney General Honorable Patrick J. Ridley Bell County Attorney P. 0. Box474 Belton, Texas 76513 Opinion No.MW- 298 Re: Whether section 53.06 of the Family Code requires service of summons on the parents of a married juvenile Dear Mr.Ridley: The Texas Family Code sets forth statutory requirements pertaining to judicial proceedings involving juveniles. See S5LO1,et. Section 53.04 provides for an adjudication or transfer hearing when a child has allegedly engaged in delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision, as defined in section 51.03. Section 53.06 requires that, prior to said hearing: (a) The juvenile court shall direct issuance of a

summmons to: (1) the child named inthe petition; (2)the child’s parent, guardian, or custodian; (3) the child’s guardian ad litem; and (4) any other person who appears to the court to be a proper or necessary party to the proceeding. (Emphasis added). You have requested our opinion as to whether section 53.06 requires service of summons upon the parents of ajuvenile whois married. Texas courts have repeatedly held that in order for ajuvenile court to have jurisdiction over a juvenile proceeding, a summons to appear at the hearing must issue to the juvenile’s parent or guardian. Grayless v. State, 567 S.W. 2d 216(Tex. Crim. App. 1978);In re T.T.W., 532 S.W.2d 418(Tex. Civ. App. - Texarkana 1976,no writ). See also Exparte Webb,3S.W. 2d 810 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928); Ex parte Tomlin, 298 S.W. 902 (Tex. Crim. App.

P. 951Honorable Patrick J. Ridley - Page Two

1927). Compare In re Honsaker, 539 S.W. 2d 198(Tex. Civ. App. -Dallas 1976, writ rePd n.r.e.1. An exception is permitted when the parent or guardian waives service of summons ln writing or by voluntarily appearing at the hearing. See Family Code g53.06(e). As the court observed in In re Honsaker, a, the r=on for such a requirement is that:

every child whoappears before the juvenile court must have the assistance of some friendly, competent adult whocan supply the child with support and guidance. Usually, one of the child’s parents or in some situations a substitute parent, will fill this need. 539S.W.2dat 200-01,citing commentary to section 51.11, Family Code. It has been suggested that because the parents of a juvenile who marries no longer have parental duties and privileges under section 12.04 of the Family Code, there isnoreason for them to be present at ajuvenile hearing, and therefore they need not be served with a summons under section 53.06. It is true that once a minor marries, he loses the disabilities of minority and acquires the legal capacity of an adult, see Family Code sections 4.03 and 31.07,and he isno longer considered a “child’ for put$%es of section 12.04. See Family Code §lLOl(definition of“child’). However, he is still subject to the juvenslaws set forth in section 51.01,et. Section 51.02 defines “child’ for purposes of Title III of the Family Code which concerns delinquent children and children inneed of supervision, as follows:

(1) ‘Child’means aperson whois: (A) ten years of age orolder and under 17years of age; or (B) seventeen years of age or older and under 18years of age who is alleged or found to have engaged in delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision as a result of acts committed before becoming 17years of age. No reference is made to marital status. See also Williams v. State, 219S.W. 2d 509 (Tex. Civ. App. - Galveston 1949,no writ). Compare Family Code SILOI,which defines

“child’ for purposes of sections lLO1,et, and 31.01,et, as a:

person under 18 years of age who is not and has not been married or who has not had his disabilities of minority removed for general purposes. ‘Adult’means any other person. It does not follow from the fact that the parents of a married juvenile have no duties and privileges under section 12.04that they would necessarily not have an interest in a juvenile proceeding sufficient to justify the statutory requirement that summons to appear at said hearing must issue. The fact of marriage does not negate the policy considerations set forth incases such as Inre Honsaker, supp&

P- 952Honorable Patrick J. Ridley - Page Three

Section 53.06 isplain and unambiguous, and its provisions must begiven effect as written, unless such a construction would lead to an absurd or unjust result. Dovalina v. Albert, 409 S.W.2d616(Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1966,writ rePd n.r.e.1. They must also be strictly construed. D.A.W. v. State, 535 S.W. 2d 21(Tex. Civ. App. - Houston B4th Dist.1 1976, writ rePd n.r.e.l. From a practical standpoint, there may be valid reasons for eliminating the requirement that summons issue under section 53.06 to the parents of a married juvenile; however, that is a matter for the legislature to consider. Wecannot ignore the express provisions of the statute. Wetherefore conclude that section 53.06 of the Family Code requires service of summons on the parents of ajuvenile whois married. SUMMARY Section 53.06 of the Family Code requires the judge of a juvenile court to direct issuance of summons on the parents of a juvenile whois married.

z* MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E.GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared byJon Bible Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Rick Gilpin Kathryn Reed Bruce Youngblood

P. 953