alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0186

SAT Date: 12/31/2013

Print Date: 1/31/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1

2 3 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: 

FATE: 

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1; P2B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, moderate through the 

GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and 

possible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are 

inhaled based on properties of the PMN material.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.2

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.35

green algal 96-h EC50 0.13

fish _ chronic value 0.018

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.038

algal _ chronic 

value

0.068

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; 

SAR chemical class = ; MW ; log Kow 4.42 (EPI); liquid with mp 

unknown (P); S = 0.23 mg/L or dispersible (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2507]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY:  Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States is submitting to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve a 
revised exporter and banker survey which expired on February 28, 1999. 
The purpose of the survey is to fulfill a statutory mandate (the 
Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 635) which 
directs Ex-Im Bank to report annually to the U.S. Congress any action 
taken toward providing export credit programs that are competitive with 
those offered by official foreign export credit agencies. The Act 
further stipulates that the annual report on competitiveness should 
include the results of a survey of lending institutions to determine 
whether their export financing is competitive with that of their 
foreign counterparts.
    Accordingly, Ex-Im Bank is requesting that the proposed survey (EIB 
No. 00-02) be sent to approximately 50 respondents, split equally 
between bankers and exporters. The new survey is the same as in 
previous years as it asks bankers and exporters to evaluate the 
competitiveness of Ex-Im Bank's programs vis-a-vis foreign export 
credit agencies. However, it has been modified in order to account for 
newer policies and to capture enough information to provide a better 
analysis of our competitiveness.

DATES:  Written comments should be received on or before March 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Direct all written comments or requests for additional 
information to David Rostker, Office of Management and Budget, 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, D.C. 20503, (202) 395-3897.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Carlista Robinson (202) 565-3351

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 50.
    Annual Burden Hours: 50.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Annual survey.

    Dated: January 31, 2000.
Carlista Robinson,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-2507 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
# Publicatieblad C 83A/6 ap

| | ISSN 1725-2598 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 83A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 49e jaargang6 april 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2598

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 83A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

49e jaargang6 april 2006

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Bekendmakingen |
| | Commissie |
| 2006/C 083A/1 | Publicatie van een vacature voor vice-voorzitter van het Communautair Bureau voor plantenrassen (Rang A*12) (artikel 29, lid 2, van het ambtenarenstatuut) — COM/2006/10022 | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

III   Bekendmakingen

Commissie

2006/C 083A/1

Publicatie van een vacature voor vice-voorzitter van het Communautair Bureau voor plantenrassen (Rang A*12) (artikel 29, lid 2, van het ambtenarenstatuut) — COM/2006/10022

1

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

III Bekendmakingen

Commissie

| 6.4.2006 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2006

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 83/1

---

PUBLICATIE VAN EEN VACATURE VOOR VICE-VOORZITTER VAN HET COMMUNAUTAIR BUREAU VOOR PLANTENRASSEN

(Rang A*12)

(artikel 29, lid 2, van het ambtenarenstatuut)

COM/2006/10022

(2006/C 83 A/01)

Het Communautair Bureau voor plantenrassen zoekt een vice-voorzitter.

Sollicitanten moeten onderdaan zijn van een van de lidstaten van de Europese Unie.

De vice-voorzitter wordt door de Raad benoemd uit een lijst van kandidaten die door de Commissie wordt voorgesteld nadat zij het advies van de raad van bestuur van het Bureau heeft ingewonnen. Het salaris en de arbeidsvoorwaarden zijn die welke gelden voor ambtenaren van rang A*12, zoals vastgesteld in het Statuut van de ambtenaren van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Het Communautair Bureau voor plantenrassen en de Commissie voeren een gelijkekansenbeleid.

De functieomschrijving, het sollicitatieformulier en de instructies voor het indienen van sollicitaties kunnen worden gedownload van de volgende adressen:

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm
  of |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

of

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm. |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm.

De uiterste datum voor de ontvangst van sollicitaties is 8 mei 2006 (nadere gegevens zijn te vinden in de instructies).

---
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-00183-LY Document 1 Filed 02/19/20 Page 6 of 6
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20134

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERMAN MORALES-MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CR-242-1

- - - - - - - - - -

November 18, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

German Morales-Maldonado appeals his guilty plea conviction

for transporting illegal aliens in the United States in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii). Morales-Maldonado argues that

the criminal information was defective. As conceded by the

Government, the information failed to allege an essential element

of the offense. See United States v. Morales-Rosales, 838 F.2d

1359, 1361 (5th Cir. 1988). Therefore, Morales-Maldonado’s

conviction is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district

court for dismissal of the information.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________ _____________________________ )

GULED HASSAN DURAN (ISN 10023), )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 16

- 2358 (RBW)

)

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.

, )

)

Respondents. )

_______________________________________)

ORDER

In accordance with the Court’s oral rulings at the status conference held on January 29,

2019 , it is hereby

ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2019, the parties shall file a joint status report

identifying the discovery issues outstanding as of that date and, if necessary, proposing a briefing

schedule to address those issues

. It is further

ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status conference on Wednesday, March

20, 2019, at 2 p.m.

SO ORDERED this 30th day of January , 201 9

.

REGGIE B. WALTON

United States District Judge
#### HARRIS v. STATE.

No. 26081.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., James TC. Allen, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the murder of Bennie Clay, with punishment assessed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for life.

Under the questions presented for review, it would serve no useful purpose to give an extended statement of the facts.

The state’s testimony shows an unprovoked and unjustified killing by the appellant, while that of the appellant and his witnesses shows a killing upon self-defense from the actual as well as the apparent attack of the deceased and upon threats, direct and communicated.

The sole complaint against the charge of the trial court was the failure .to give a special charge which would have the effect of instructing the jury that the fact that appellant was armed when he sought out the deceased for an explanation as to the threats made could not and would not deprive the appellant of his right of self-defense.

It has been the repeated holding of this court that a charge as to the right of an accused to go armed when seeking his adversary for an explanation of his conduct is not required unless the trial court, in some manner — such as by a charge on provoking the difficulty, or otherwise, places a limitation upon the accused’s right of self-defense. Branch’s P.C., Art. 1109, Sec. 1950.

Here, there was no limitation placed upon appellant’s complete and perfect right of self-defense. Under the 'rale stated, then, the trial court did not err in refusing the requested charge.

Complaint is made of the overruling of a motion for continuance, which, upon its face, recited that it was a first application. In overruling the motion, the trial court certified that he “considered” the motion as a third application for continuance. However, he did not so certify as a fact, nor did he recite any fact which would so show, that the motion was a third application for continuance.

*45Whether the motion was a first or third application is immaterial and not necessary to be here determined, for, upon the hearing of the motion for new trial, there was presented by the state the affidavit of the absent witness for whom the continuance was sought, in which the witness swore she would not have testified as appellant, in the motion for continuance, represented that she would. 9 Tex.Jur., Sec. 155, at page 865.

For this reason, alone, the trial court was amply justified in refusing the motion for a new trial, based upon the refusal of the motion for continuance.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-36,841]


Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of America, Dothan, Alabama; Notice 
of Revised Determination on Reopening

    By letter postmarked January 5, 2000, a company official requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's notice of negative 
determination regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment 
assistance applicable to workers of the subject firm.
    On December 21, 1999, workers of Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of 
America producing VHS videocassettes were denied TAA eligibility based 
on the finding that criterion (3) of Section 222 of the worker group 
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on January 14, 2000 (65 FR 
2432). A survey was conducted by the Department of the subject firms' 
major declining customers. None of the respondents increased import 
purchases while reducing business with Sony. Although Sony Magnetic 
Products Inc. of America was shifting production of VHS videocassettes 
from Dothan, Alabama to a foreign country, imports had not yet been 
returned to the U.S.
    The Department has obtained new information from the company 
documenting that the company has received VHS videocassette imports and 
the reliance on imports will continue as production decreases at the 
Dothan, Alabama plant.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, 
it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with VHS videocassettes produced by the subject firm 
contributed importantly to the decline in sales and to the total or 
partial separation of workers of the subject firm. In accordance with 
the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following revised 
determination:

    ``All workers of Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of America, Dothan, 
Alabama, engaged in employment related to the production of VHS 
videocassettes, separated from employment on or after September 2, 
1998 through two years from the issuance of this determination, are 
eligible to apply for worker adjustment assistance under Section 223 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of January, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-2505 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
J~~~ ED STq T

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

'9 C PROT ~-o~ 

OFFICE OF 

OCT 1 8 20112 AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated October 17, 2012, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to 

the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E). We 

concur with CBFO's draft expansion memo reflecting the addition of debris waste from the Reduced 

Enrichment Research and Test Reactor (RERTR) program; and the second batch of fuel pins packaged 

in 30-gallon containers to the ANL-E remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste stream 

ANLEHDRM. EPA approved this addition on October 4, 2012, (see EPA Air pocket for the Report #A98-49; II-A4-167). 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of RH TRU waste are appropriately included in 

Attachment 4 of the draft expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and 

processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for ANL-E CCP. If 

you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343- 

9422. 

Sincerely, 

<-~ C~_L ~ V _-, 

Rajani Joglekar 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 % Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-547-000]


High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 15, 2000, High Island Offshore 
System, L.L.C. (HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed in 
Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of October 1, 2000.
    HIOS states that this filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's mandate under Order No. 637 that pipelines file to remove 
any tariff provisions that are inconsistent with the temporary removal 
of the maximum rate ceiling for short term capacity releases.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24766 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

----

I Informácie

Rada

----

Nadobudnutie účinnosti rozhodnutia Asociačnej rady EÚ – Maroko č. 1/2005 zo 4. augusta 2005, ktorým sa udeľuje výnimka z protokolu č. 4 k Euro-stredomorskej dohode o pridružení medzi Európskymi spoločenstvami a ich členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Marockým kráľovstvom na strane druhej, ktorý sa týka vymedzenia pojmu pôvodné výrobky a metód administratívnej spolupráce (Ú. v. EÚ L 206 z 9. augusta 2005, s. 8)

(2006/C 76/01)

Dohoda o voľnom obchode medzi Marockým kráľovstvom a Tureckom nadobudla platnosť 1. januára 2006.

Podmienky článku 2 rozhodnutia č. 1/2005 Asociačnej rady EÚ – Maroko sa týmto splnili a preto sa toto rozhodnutie od 1. januára 2006 uplatňuje.

----

Komisia

----

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

28. marca 2006

(2006/C 76/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

----

----

Predbežné oznámenie o koncentrácii

(Prípad č. COMP/M.4183 — Foodco Pastries/Tele Pizza)

Prípad, ktorý môže byť posúdený v zjednodušenom konaní

(2006/C 76/03)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

----

(1)Ú. v. EÚ L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)Ú. v. EÚ C 56, 5.3.2005, s. 32.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, the
General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                    
|/s/ Debra A. Cafaro                                                                                                 
|Debra A. Cafaro                                                                                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, the
General Partner of ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be

retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.