alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 7      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
REGULATION II - PERMIT SYSTEM 

RULE 2:-:3 Transfers 

An Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate shall not be transferable, 

whether by operation of law or otherwise ~tther from one location to another. 

from one person to another, or from one piece of equipment to another, except 

on written approval of the Control Officer . 

• * • * * 

Proposed 07/01/88 MODOC - RULE 2.3 Page 1 

Showing Revisions and Be-h!ti-ons and New Rules
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4885 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4885

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Hydroxypropylmethyl 
                               cellulose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Hydroxypropylmethyl 
                               cellulose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYL CELLULOSE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.79 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Hydroxypropylmethyl 
cellulose) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before October 30, 2000, to be assured of consideration. 

## Departmental Offices/Office of Foreign Assets Control 

*OMB Number:*                     1505-0130.                 

*Form Number:*                     None.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Iraqi Sanctions Regulations.                 

*Description:*                     United Nations Security Council Resolution 986 authorizes certain transactions with Iraq. These regulations implement that resolution pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act., 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 and the United Nations Participation Act, 22 U.S.C. 287c.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit, Individuals or households, Not-for-profit institutions.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     150.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     1 hour.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     On occasion.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     150 hours.                 

Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland (202) 622-1563, Departmental Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-24971 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

Jose Luis Sanchez

vs.

National Credit Systems, Inc.

§

§

§

§

§

NO: AU:20-CV-00237-RP

ORDER RESETTING HEARING BY VIDEO

 The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear

for a final pretrial conference on Wednesday, June 02, 2021 at 03:30 PM by video conference.

The Courtroom Deputy will send out the Zoom invitation prior to the hearing.

The parties should consult Local Rules CV-16(e)–(f) regarding matters to be filed in advance

of the final pretrial conference. Each party is expected to file the materials required by Local Rule

CV-16(e) as one electronic document, styled as a “Notice to the Court,” with each of the 10

submissions identified in the Local Rules (as applicable) attached as an exhibit to that electronic

document. If a party deems it necessary to file any of those submissions under seal, it may file one

separate electronic document, styled as a “Motion for Leave to File Under Seal,” and attach those

submissions as exhibits. Any such motion should explain in detail why sealing the attached exhibits

is necessary. Similar expectations govern the submissions required by Local Rule CV-16(f).

 SIGNED on 25th day of May, 2021.

______________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00237-RP Document 23 Filed 05/25/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

LINDA CREGO,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

TACO CABANA, INC.,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00125-XR

ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT

On this day, the undersigned issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, 

ordering Plaintiff’s Complaint to be filed, and directing Plaintiff to request issuance of summons

because her Complaint contains at least one non-frivolous claim. Accordingly, all matters 

referred to the Magistrate Judge have been considered and acted upon.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled and numbered case is 

RETURNED to the District Court for all purposes.

SIGNED this 6th day of February, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4973 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain sleeping bag carry cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ADERHOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain sleeping 

bag carry cases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SLEEPING BAG CARRY CASES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4973 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sleeping bag carry cases 

imported separately from 

sleeping bags, with a body 

of polyester or nylon, and 

with a drawstring closure, 

not under 77.5 cm in circumference and not exceeding 127.7 cm in circumference, valued not 

over $2 (provided for in 

subheading 6307.90.98) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form  S‐8 (Nos. 333-143994, 333-64164, 33-106267, 333-40750 and 333-175909) of Agilysys, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report  dated June 3, 2014 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10‐K.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Atlanta, Georgia


June 3, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5035 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5035

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain magnetic snaps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain magnetic snaps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MAGNETIC SNAPS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.96.06        Magnetic snaps      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          used as a                                                         12/31/2015
                          component part of
                          finished leather
                          goods (provided
                          for in subheading
                          9606.10.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Agnes Taylor, Appellant, v John Doe et al., Doing Business as Coliseum Plaza Associates, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this personal injury action, Supreme Court granted defendants’ request for a protective order vacating item 9 of plaintiffs combined demands for discovery. That was error.

Plaintiffs request sought: "All written complaints and accident reports of those persons who claim their shoes were caught in the joint space and/or substance(s)/filler therein, whether said claim resulted in bodily injury or property damage, from the date of construction up until the date of the accident.” We conclude that this demand constituted a request for prior similar accidents and was thus proper *(see, Klatz v Armor Elevator Co.,*93 AD2d 633, 637-638). There is no merit to defendants’ argument that the request was overly broad *(see, Sullivan v New York City Tr. Auth.,*109 AD2d 879, 880; *Barnes v Barnes,*96 AD2d 894; *Palmieri v Kilcourse,*91 AD2d 657). Moreover, reports of property damage claims were properly demanded because such documents are material and relevant in establishing the existence of a dangerous condition and defendants’ notice thereof *(see, Klatz v Armor Elevator Co., supra).*Finally, plaintiff need not resort to other discovery devices before resorting to discovery pursuant to CPLR 3120 *(see, Brady v Wyeth Labs.,*106 AD2d 795, 796). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Burke, J.—discovery.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5141 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 6-volt batteries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 6- 

volt batteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN 6-VOLT BATTERIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.56 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain 6-volt batteries) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5141 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5110

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methylimidazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Himes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methylimidazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-METHYLIMIDAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1-Methylimidazole   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 616-47-                                                  12/31/2015
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2933.29.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2014

No. 04-14-00782-CR

Robert TORRES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR1875

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Appellant Robert Torres pled nolo contendere to 

aggravated sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to eighteen years of imprisonment and a 

fine of $1,000 in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On October 16, 2014, 

the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After 

Torres filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of 

appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 

25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission 

to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes 

the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written 

motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its 

permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately 

reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Torres does not have a right to appeal. We must 

dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been 

made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), 

unless an amended trial court certification showing that Torres has the right to appeal is made 

part of the appellate record by January 12, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. 

State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).
We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

p0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138751 & (24) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138751 

 COA: 288462 

Iosco CC: 2007-003229-FH; 

 2007-003230-FH 

SCOTT ROBERT LINCOLN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5066 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-1,2-PROPANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol 

(CAS No. 616–30–8) (provided for in subheading 

2922.19.95) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5066 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 3,      2008            |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
|  /s/Jimmy      E. Addison                         |   |
| Jimmy      E. Addison                                  |   |
| Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-130147 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2005 (September 20, 2005 as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Note 12) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatoryparagraphs referring to (1) allocations of certain assets and expense items applicable to Horizon and subsidiaries, (2) the bankruptcy filing of the Combined Companies and the fact the combined financial statements do not include any adjustmentsthat might result should the Combined Companies be unable to continue as a going concern and (3) referring to the restatement of the financial statements), relating to the combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries andof our report dated April 22, 2005 (June 8, 2005 as to the effect of the restatement discussed in Note A to the schedule) (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the restatement of the financial statement schedule) relating tothe financial statement schedule of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of International Coal Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Louisville, Kentucky 

July 23, 2007