Stack Analysis,

Whitacre-Greer

Fireproofing

Company 1400 S. Mahoning

Ave. Alliance, Ohio 44601 Report Performed Velocity,

Temperature,

Moisture,

Particulate,

Sulfur

Dioxide, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric

Acid, Chlorine

and Mercury

Emissions

Testing Sampling performed

on the Swindel

Kiln Outlet P004 Alliance, OH 44601 Test Date: 09/20/2011

& 09/21/2011Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company 1400 S. Mahoning

Ave. Alliance, Ohio 44601
Performed Velocity,

Temperature,

Moisture,

Particulate,

Sulfur Dioxide, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric

Acid, Chlorine

and Mercury

Emissions

Testing Sampling performed

on the Swindel

Kiln Outlet P004 Alliance, OH 44601 Test Date: 09/20/2011

& 09/21/2011

•ustom Stack Analysis,

LLC.REPORT CERTIFICATION Custom Stack Analysis,

LLC. has used its professional

experience

and best professional efforts in performing

this compliance

test. have reviewed

the results of these tests and to the best of my knowledge

and belief they are true and correct.

/.•.i.•)atee..s K. Gray

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NI,• Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: stacks@,customstackanalysL•,.comEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Custom Stack Analysis,

LLC. conducted

emissions

sampling

using USEPA Methods 1-5, 8 & 29. Testing

was conducted

for velocity,

temperature,

moisture, particulate, sulfur dioxide,

hydrochloric

acid, hydrofluoric

acid, chlorine

and mercury emissions on September

20 th and 21 st, 2011. The testing was conducted

for compliance purposes.

The Custom

Stack Analysis,

LLC. test crew consisted

of Mr. Jim Gray, Mr. Joe Crowe,

Mr. Jeff Pittman,

and Mr. Carlos Javier.

The testing procedures were coordinated

by Mr. John Miller from Whitacre-Greer

Fireproofing

Company.

All testing procedures

were witnessed

by Mrs. Jana Gannon

of the Ohio EPA Northeast District.
Pollutant Average

Test Result Particulate 3.75 Ibs/hr Sulfur Dioxide 48.13 Ibs/hr Hydrochloric Acid 0.076 Ibs/hr Hydrofluqric Acid 1.050 Ibs/hr Chlorine 0.077 Ibs/hr Mercury 6.19 10 .4 Ibs/hr
A description

of the testing protocol

is included

on pages 5-9. All testing calculations are located

on pages 14-16. Appendix

1 includes

field test data. Appendix 2 contains

laboratory

data from Custom

Stack Analysis,

LLC and Columbia

Analytical Services, Inc. Appendix

3 contains

calibration

data for the equipment

used on test day. Appendix 4 contains

process

data. Test results are located

on pages 2-4.

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone." 330-525-5119

l•'ax." 330-525-7908

E-mail: stacks@cu.•'tomstackanalysL•.,

corn Page 1Test Results 9/20/2011 PM/SO2 Run #1.

Run #2

Run #3 Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec)

35.41 32.84 31.27 Standard Cubic Feet an Hour

742,575 703,817 659,643 Actual Cubic Feet.per Minute

23,113 21,440 20,414 Stack Temperature

(F)

390 381 384 Moisture % (Measured) 10.66% 9.79% 10.88% Moisture % (Saturated) 1454.26% 1319.21% 1354,09% Isok|nicity % 100.23% 101.38% 103.22% Carbon Dioxide % 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Oxygen % 17.00% 17.00% 17.00% Nitrogen % 80.00% 80.00% 80.00% Particulate (Ibslhr) 3,87 3.26 4.14 3,75 Particulate (Ibsldscf) 5.21176E-06 4.62682E-06 6.27238E-06 5o37033E-06 Particulate (grldscf) 0.03648 0.03239 0,04391 0.03759 SO2 (Ibslhr) S02 (Ibsldscf) 47.71 46.46 50.21 48.13 6.43E-05 6.60E-05 7.61 E-05

6.88E-05

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O, Box 3750 14614 CenfieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mall: stacks@customstackanalysls.Com Page 2Test Results Mercury 9/21/2011 Run #1

Run #2

Run #3_ Stack Gas Veloclty (ffJsec)

34.29 34,66 34.48 Standard Cubic Feet an Hour

708,534 722,830 724,535 Actual Cubic Feet per Minute

22,388 22,626 22,507 Stack Temperature

(F)

382 383 379 Moisture % (Measured) 12.92% 11.85% 11.73% Isoklnlclty % 99.97% 100,70% 98.91% Carbon Dioxide % 3,00% 3,00% 3.00% Oxygen % 17.00% 17.00% 17.00% Nitrogen % 80.00% 80,00% 80.00% Mercur• (mgldscm) 0.014 0,006 0.020 0.014 Mercuw (Ibslhr) 6.41E-04 2o89E-04 9.26E-04 6.19E-04

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mall: stacks@customstackanalysis.Com Page 3Stack

Gas Velocity (ft/sec) Standard Cubic Feet an Hour Actual Cubic Feet per Minute Stack Temperature

(F) Moisture % (Measured) Isokinlcity % Carbon Dioxide % Oxygen % Nitrogen % Hydrochloric Acid (Ibslhr) Hydrochloric Acid (Ibsldscf) Hydrochloric Acid (ppm) Chlorine (Ibalhr) Chlodne (Ibsldscf) Chlorine (ppm) Hydrofluoric acid (Ibslhr) Hydrofluoric acid (Ibeldscf) Hydrofluoric acid (ppm) Test

Results HCL/C2/HF 9/21/2011 Run #1

Run #2

Run #•3

• 33.04 34.87

33.82 670,887 726,468

708,960 21.566 22,765

22,076 385 382

376 14.06% 12.03%

12.20% 105.07% 102,02%

101.24% 3.00% 3.00%

3.00% 17.00% 17.00%

17.00% 80.00% 80.00%

80.00% 0.072 0.074

0.083

0.076 1.07E-07 1.02E-07

1.17E-07

1.09E-07 1.13 1.08

1.25

1.15 0.002 0.004

0.003

0.003 2.52E-09 5.33E-09

4.76E-09

4.20E-09 0.014 0.029

0.026

0.023 0.962 1.039

1.148

1.050 1.43E-06 1.43E-06

1.62E-06

1.49E-06 27.7 27.7

'31.3

28.9

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NIi Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

F.-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 4METHOD 1 Sample and velocity

traverses

for stationary

sources.

To aid in the representative measurement

of pollutant

emissions

and/or

total volumetric

flow rate from a stationary

source,

a measurement

site where the effluent

stream

is flowing

in a known direction

is selected,

and the cross-section

of the stack is divided

into a number of equal areas. A traverse

point is then located

within each of the•e equal areas.
METHOD 2 Determination of stack gas velocity

and volumetric

flow rate. The average

gas velocity in a stack is determined

from the gas density

and from measurement

of the average velocity

head with a Type S (Sta, usscheibe

or reverse

type) pitot tube.
METHOD 3 Gas analysis

for the determination

of dry molecular

weight.

This method

is applicable for determining

carbon dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

and dry molecular weight of a sample

from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel

combustion

p,rocess.

METHOD 4 Determination of moisture

content'in

stack gases. A gas sample

is extracted

at a constant rate from the source.

It is determined

either volumetrically

or gravimetrically.

Custom Stack Analy.•is, LLC P. O. Box 3750 14614 C¢J•fieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: stacks@cuslomstaekanalysig,com Page 5METHOD 8 TESTING

DESCRIPTION

Sulfur Dioxide

and Particulate

Matter samples

were collected

following

EPA Methods 1-5 & 8. The equipment

used for testing consisted

of a Custom

Stack Analysis Sampling Apparatus

(EPA type). A type "S" pitot and a heated

sampling

probe were used with the sampling

train. All equipment

was calibrated

in the laboratory

prior to the test. The sampling

nozzle and the pitot tubes were measured

on the day of the test. All calibrations can be found in the appendix.

The dust laden gases are passed

through

a pyrex probe. The first and third impingers

were the standard

Greenburg-Smith

type and the second

and fourth one were a modified

Greenburg-Smith

type. The first impinger contained 100 ml of 80% isopropanol.

The gases leaving

the first impinger

are passed through a four inch filter holder containing

Gelman

Type A-E fiberglass

filter media. The second and third impinger

contained

100 ml of 3% Hydrogen

Peroxide.

The fourth impinger is used as a dry trap. After leaving the fourth impinger

the gases passed through a "Drierite"

column

containing

about 500 grams of calcium

,sulfate

(CaSO4) desicant to remove

any remaining.water

vapor.- The dry gas then passed

through

the hose portion

of the umbilical

cord to an Custom

Stack Analysis

Sampling

Apparatus.

In the module

the gas was moved

through

the system

by a leakless

air pump to a Rockwell 175-S dry test meter. The dry t6st meter exhausted

to a calibrated

orifice to measure the flow rate of the gases passing

through

the sampling

apparatus.

A type "S" pitot tube was attached

to the sheath of the heated probe and nozzle.

The orifice pressure taps and the pitot tube were connected

to a Dwyer duel i0 inch combination inclined-well type manometer.

One half of the manometer

measured

the orifice differential pressure

(^H) and the other half measured

the flue gas velocity

head (^P). The temperature

of the flue gas was measured

by a type "K" thermocouple

connected to a Marlin Digital Temperature

Indicator.

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 (•enfield St NE Alliance Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330.525-7908

l,.Lmail: s/acks@customstackanalysL•.. Page 6METHOD 26A TESTING

DESCRIPTION Samples were collected

following

EPA Method

26A. The equipment

used for testing consisted

of a Custom

Stack Analysis

Sampling

Apparatus

(EPA type). A type "S" pitot and a heated

sampling

probe was used with the sampling

train. All equipment was calibrated

in the laboratory

prior to the test. The sampling

nozzle

and the pitot tubes were measured

on the day of the test. All calibrations

can be found in the appendix. The gases are passed

througl•

a heated pyrex probe an•i a heated glass four inch filter holder containing

Pallflex

TX40H145

filter media.

The gases leaving

the filter were collected

in a series of six impingers

packed

in ice. The first, second

and third impinger shall be of the Greensburg-Smith design

with a standard

tip. The first two impingers contained

100 ml of 0.1 N H2SO4.

The next impinger

contained

100 ml of 0.1 N NaoH and the last impinger

was left empty. After'passing

through

the fourth impinger the gases pass through

a "Drierite"

column

containing

about 500 grams of calcium sulfate (CaSO4)

desicant

to remove

the remaining

water vapor.

The dry gas then passed through

the hose portion

of the umbilical

cord to a Custom

Stack Analysis

Model #3000 stack sampling

module.

In the module

the gas was moved

through

the system by a leakless

air pump to a Rockwell

175-S dry test meter. The dry test meter exhausted

to a calibrated

orifice to measure

the flow rate of the gases passing

through

the sampling apparatus. A type "S" pitot tube was attached

to the sheath

of the heated

probe and nozzle. The orifice pressure

taps and the pitot tube were connected

to a Dwyer dual 10 inch combination

inclined-well

type manometer.

One half of the manometer

measured the orifice differential

pressure

(^H) and, the other half measured

the flue gas velocity head (^P). The temperature

of the flue gas was measured

by a type "K" thermocouple connected to a Marlin

Digital Temperature

Indicator.

The C02 and 02 levels were determined using a Fyrite. Sample recovery

was performed

according

to USEPA

Method

26A section

6.2.

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 C.et!fieM St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: stacks@cttstomstuckanalysis.com Page 7METHOD 29 TESTING

DESCRIPTION Samples were collected

following

EPA Method

29. Each point was sampled

for 10 minutes

for a total of a 120 minute test. The equipment

used for testing consisted

of a Burrell Model B orsat analyzer

and a Alliance

Pollution

Control

Stack Train Sampler (EPA type). A type "S" pitot and a heated

sampling

probe was used with the sampling train. All equipment

was calibrated

in the laboratory

prior to the test. The sampling nozzle and the pitot tubes were measured

on the day of the test. All calibrations

can be found in the appendix.

The gases are passed

through

a heated

pyrex probe and a heated glass four inch filter holder containing

Gelman

Type A-E fiberglass

filter media. The gases leaving

the filter were collected

in a series of six impingers

packed

in ice. The first, second,

fourth, fifth, and sixth impingers

were the modified

Greenburg-Smith type and the third one was .a standard

Greenburg-Smith

type. The first impinger

is left empty. The second

and third impinger'contained 100 ml each of HNO3/

H202. The gases then pass through

the fourth impinger

which is left empty. After leaving

the fourth impinger the gases passed

through

a fifth and sixth impinger

containing

100 ml each of acidified KMnO4.

They then pass through

a "Drierite"

column

containing

about 500 grams of calcium

sulfate

(CaSO4)

desicant

to remove

any remaining

water vapor. The dry gas then passed

through

the hose portion

of the umbilical

cord to an Alliance Pollution Control

"Stack Sampler"

module.

In the module

the gas was moved

through the system

by a leakless

air pump to a Rockwell

175-S dry test meter. The dry test meter exhausted

to a calibrated

orifice to measure

the flow rate of the gases passing through the sampling

apparatus.

A type "S" pitot tube was attached

to the sheath of the heated probe and nozzle.

The orifice pressure

taps and the pitot tube were connected to a Dwyer dual 10 inch combination

inclined-well

type manometer.

One half of the manometer measured

the orifice differential

pressure

(^H) and the other half measured the flue gas velocity

head (^P). The temperature

of the flue gas was measured

by a type "K" thermocouple

connected

to a Marlin digital temperature

controller.

The C02 and 02 levels were collected

into teddlar

bags,and

brought

back to the laboratory

for orsat analysis. Sampling

train recovery

was conducted

as follows:

Container

No. 1 contained the filter. Container

No. 3 contained

the probe nozzle,

probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder with 100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3.

Container

No. 4 consisted

of impingers 1 through

3, connecting

glassware

and back half of filter holder being rinsed with 100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3. Container

No. 5A was the fourth impinger

being rinsed with 100 ml of 0.1 N HNO3. Container

No. 5B consisted

of the fifth and sixth impinger

with acidified KmnO4

being rinsed three times with a total of 100 ml of acidified

KmnO4.

They are then rinsed with 100 ml of water. Container

No.

Cttstom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Ce/•field St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 l'hone: 330-525-5l 19 I•?tx: 330-525'-7908

E-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 8METHOD 29 TESTING

DESCRIPTION

CONT.

5C was the fifth and sixth impinger

being rinsed with 25ml of 8 N HCL to remove

any remaining deposits.

The container

is initially filled with 200 ml of water. Container

No. 6 contains the spent calcium

sulfate.

Cont, ainer No. 8A contained

300 ml of 0.1 N Nitric acid solution

used in the sample

recovery.

Container

No. 8B contained

100 ml of distilled water used in the sample

recovery.

Container

No. 9 contained

200 ml of fresh Hn03/H202 solution

that was used in the impingers.

Container

No. 10 contained

100 ml of fresh acidified

potassium

permanganate

solution.

Container

No. 11 contained

200 ml of distilled

water plus 25 ml of 8N HCL. Container

No. 12 contained

3 unused

blank filters from the same lot as the sampling

filters.

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.fieM St NF. Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: .•'tacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 98 Sampling System (Following the procedures

in USEPA Method 6 section 6.1.1 for particulate

collection)

TEMPERATURE SENSOR ./•

IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL, MAY • REPLACED •" • BY AN EQUIVALENT CONDENSER PITOT TUBE i' ST^CKWALL THERMOMErER TEMPERATURE HEATED AREA SENSOR \ PROBE

",, '-• \, --•'m----• MOMETER --• L.J

/ --.• i_

,T. CHEC•V•.VE •-iZ::•:: • ••.:----•:•:

':•.11•
• r------J|

FILTER

{;l•j

•.j (,,•

VACUUM REVERSE'TYPE !1

I•,.'--E---•l

HOLDER

MANOMETER

L

ORIFICEL

ORIFICE MANOMETER

THERMOMETERS IMPiNGER$ •RYPASS

MAIN

VACUUM VALVE VALVE (•') GAUGE

AIR PUMP LINE

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St HE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: ,•'tacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 1026A Sampling System

O•ic¢ Fi•e

"•

•omct=" Mere"

•

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 C.enfield St NE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-maih stacks@c:ustomstackanalysis.com Page 1129 Sampling System

Glass Probe

Temperature Sensor
Glass Probe Liner

Glass Filter Holder Heated Area
Manometer

Odfice B•-pnss

Main alve Valve Alr-l"ight Pump Temperature

Gauge

Line

Custom Stack AnalysL•', LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 CenfieM St HE Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 12Sampling Point

Locations

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Location Outlet Upstream

69.5" Downstream 237" Stack Diameter 43.5 X 36 Inches Stack Point #

1

4.4 Inches 2 13.1 3 21.8 4 30.5 5 39.2

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 17. O. Box 3750 14614 Cet!l•eld St NE Alliance, Ohto 4460l Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: xtacks@cuxtomstackanalysi.•.com Page 13CALCULATIONS Outlet RUN #•1 RUN #2 _RUN #3 1. Vm (std) 37.00 35.47 33.85

VM 17.64 PBAR + 13.6 Y Tm

Vm (std) Volume of gas collected, corrected to standard conditions, cult. Vm Volume of gas sampled at meter box, cuft 17.64 Standard temperature,

528 Rankine st, d pressure, 29.92. Tm Average dry gas meter temperature,

460 Rankine. Pbar Barometric pressure, inches of mercury (Hg) ^H Average pressure differential across orifice. 13,6 Specific gravity of mercury. Y Calibration factor of meter box. RUN #1 RUN#2 RUN #3 37.00 35.47 33.85 38.57 37.20 35,80 17.64 17.64 17.64 532.55 536.6 540.5 28.85 28.91 28.88 1.467 1.2955

1.165 13.6 13.6 13.6

RUN #I _RUN #2 RUN #__3 Vw (std) 4.42 3.85 4.13

VIcP H20 M H20 RTstdPstdK2 Volume of water and silica colected. Density of water, 0.002201 Ib/ml. Molecular weight of water, 18.01 Ib/Ib-mole. Ideal gas constant, 21.85 in..hg ft3/R-Ib-mole. Standard absolute temperature,

528 R. Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg. 0.0471 ft3 ml. VIc P H20 Mh20

RTstd K2 Vie Pstd .RUN #1 RUN #____•2 _RUN #3 93.7 81.7 87.7 0.002201 0.002201 0.002201 18,01 18.01 18.01 21.85 21.85 21.85 528 528 528 29.92 29.92 29.92 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471

3. BWS
Bw$Vw(std) Vm(std)

4. Md

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.

RUN #._._.._•1 RUN #•2 _RUN #3 0.1066154 0.0979091

0.108813

Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, scf. Volume of gas sampled at meter box, scf. _RUN #1 RUN #....•_.•2 RUN #_.__.__•3 29.16 29.16 29.16
Md Dry molecular weight, Ib Ib-mole. 0.44 Molecular weight of CO2 divided by 100. 0.32 Molecular weight of O2 divided by 100. 0.28 Molecular weight of N2 or CO divided by 100. Co2, 02, N2, and CO are in percent by volume, dry basis.

Vw(std) Vm(std)+ Vw(std)I

RUN#1 RUN#2 RUN#3 0.1066154 0.0979091

0.108813 4.42 3.85 4.13 37.00 35.47 33.85 10.44 (%CO2) +, 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2) %CO) RUN #_1 RUN #2 RUN #3 29.16 29.16 29.16 0.44 0,44 0.44 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.28 0.28

P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cenfield St NF, Alliance. Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330.525-7908

E-tnail: stacks@customstackanalysis.com Page 145o Ms
MsM H20 RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 27.97 28.07 27.95
Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole. Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib Ib-mole.
RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 V$ 35.41 32,84 31.27
Vs Average stack gas velocity, ft sec. 85,49 Pitot tube constant, ft /sec. Cp Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless, ^P Velocity head of stack gas, avg, sq rt. Ts Temperature

of stack gas, 460 (Rankine). Ps Absolute stack gas pressure, barometric static, Ms Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis.
RUN #1 RUN #•2 R__UN #3 ACFM 23113.293 21440.242 20413.602 Y$Isokiniclty K4TsVmstd PsVsAnMin.Bws Average stack gas velocity, ft sec. RUN #1 _RUN #2 RUN #3 100.2267 101.38068 103.21538 0,09450 for English units. Stack temperature

•60 R. Volume of gas collected, scf. Stack pressure, inches Hg. Stack velocity, ft /sec. Area of the sampling nozzle, cuff. Minutes of test. Water vapor in the gas.stream, propo•ion,

IMd (l-Bws) + M H20 (Bws) RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 27.97 28,07 27.95 18 18 18

85.49 --v Ps Ms RUN#1 RUN #2 RUN #3 35.41 32.84 31,27 85.49 85.49 85.49 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.4805549 0.4491937 0.4-259911 849.65 841.4 843.55 28.86 28.92 28.89 27.97 28.07 27.95
IStackAraa 60 Vs RUN #_.__..•1 R__UN #2 RUN #3 35.41 32.84 31.27
Ps K4 Ts Vmstd Vs An Min (1-Bws) RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 0.0945 0.0945 0.0945 849.65 841,4 843.55 37.00 35.47 33,85 28.86 28.92 28.89 35.41 32.84 31.27 0.0005412 0.0005412 0.0005412 60 60 60 0.1066154 0.0979091

0.108813

Custom Stack Analysis, I,LC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.field St NF. Alliance, Ohio 44601 Phone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-mail: s/acks@cu.•'tomstackanalysis.com Page 15RUN #1 Lbs/Hr 3.87' 2,205 E-E MnscfhVm std
RUN #1. GrlDscf 0.0364825
0.0154 Vm std Mn

RUN #1 SCFH 742575.38
3600BwsATs•Ps•TsPSVS

RUN #2 RUN #•3 3.26 4.14 Conversion from mg to lbs.

2,205
Weight gain of filter and wash minus blank. Standard stack volumetric flow rate, Volume of air sampled, at s, tp,

Mn E-6

scfh Vm std RUN #•1 RUN #2_ RUN #3 2,205 E-6 2.205 E-6 2.205 E-6 87.65 74.6 96.5 742575.38 703817.13 659643.43 37.00 35.47 33.85
RUN #2 RUN #_..___•3

0.0154 Mn 0.0323877 0.0439066 *• Vmstd Conversion to grains from mg. Volume of air sampled at stp. RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 Weight gain of filter and wash minus blank.

37.00 35.47 33.85 87.65 74.6 96.5

RUN #__2 RUN #__3 703817.13 659643,43 Tstd Ps 3600 (1 Bws Vs A *----Ts Pstd RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN_• Seconds per hour. 3600 3600 3600 Watervapor in the gas stream, proportion.

0.1066154 0.0979091

0.108813 Area of stack in sq ft. 10.88 10.88 10.88 Standard absolute temperature,

528 R.

528 528 528 Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg.

29.92 29.92 29,92 Temperature of stack gas, 460 (Rankine),

849.65

841.4 843.55 Absolute stack gas pressure, barometric + static.

28.85 28.91 28.88 Average stack gas velocity, ft /sec, 35.41 32.84 31.27

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. P. O. Box 3750 14614 Cen.field St NE Alliance, O, hio 44601 P/tone: 330-525-5119

Fax: 330-525-7908

E-maih stack.•.@customstackanalysis.com Page 16Test DataTEST DATA

COMPANY NAME ADDRESS CITY

Dover STATE OH ZIP •6103 TEST METHODS

Methos 1-4 CREW MEMBERS

,|eft P,Joe C LOCATION Outlet SOURCE P004 Outlet CONTROL Whitacre- Creer Fireproofin•

P004 Outlet 2411 State Route 516 NW

]Bashouse

RUN#1 RUN#2

RUN#3 DATE TIMERUN LENGTH (min) VOLUME (cubic feet) Y FACTOR BAROMETRIC METER TEMP. (R) STACK TEMP. (R) AVERAGE ^P AVERAGE ^H IMPINGER VOLUME PITOTCOEF. STATIC PRESSURE STACK AREA NOZZLE SlZE(sq/ff) CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN WEIGHTS INITIALPROBE#1 POST PROBE#1 TOTAL INITIAL PROBE #2 POST PROBE #2 TOTAL AVG Probe Weight INITIAL FILTER #t POST FILTER #1 TOTAL INITIAL FILTER #2 POST FILTER #2 TOTAL AVG Filter Weight 9/20/2011

9/20/2011 9/20/2011 "8:55-9:59 10:37-11:43

12:32-13:36 60 60.00

60.00 38.573 37.20

35.804 28.85 28.9'1

28.88 532.55 536.60

540.50 849.65 841.40

843.55 0.48 0.45

0.431.17 1.3081.70 87.70 1.4793.700.84 0.84

0.84 0.10 0.10

0.10 10.88 10.88

10.88 0.0005412 0.000541

0.000541 3.00 3.00 17.00 17.00

17.00 80 80

803.00

117027.1 119427.4

100994.8 119453.2 101043.1

57.6 117057.130 25.8

48.3 117027 119427.3

100994.8 1t7057.t 119453.2

101043.1 30.1 25.9

48.3 30.05 25.85

48.3 20101.0 20474

20103.9 20158.6 20522.7

20152.1 57.6 48.7

48.2 20101 20473.9

20103.9 20158.6 20522.7

20152.1 57.6 48.8

48.2 48.75 48.2TEST,RESULTS

OUTLET RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 VM (std) VW (std) BWS (measured) MDMSVS (ft/sec) SCFH ACFM DCFM ISOKINETIC % PARTICULATE LBS/HR G•DSCF LBS/DSCF

37.00

35.47

33.85 4.42 3.85

4.13 0.107 0.098

0.109 29.16 29.16

29.16 27.97017207 28.06733409

27.9456472 35.41 32.84

31.27 703817.1293 742575.3812 659643.431 23113.29346 21440.2425

20413.602 12376.25635 11730.28549

10994.0572 t00.2267001 101.380682

103.215384

3.870142536 3.256432577

4.13753185 0.036482488 0.032387714

0.04390663 4.62682E-06 5.21178E-06 6.27238E-06

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions.
Bws Stack moisture content. Md Determination

of dry molecular weight of stack gas. Ms Determination

of stack gas molecular weight. Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ftJsec.) ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity.
DCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. L:r;IDII;:2;•II iii •°:•iandard

Cubic feet.TEST DATA

OUTLET RUN #t RUN #2 RUN #3 METHOD 8 Vtb (ml) Vt (ml) Vsoln VaN 0.1

0.1

0.1 33.51000 331000

36.31000 10 10

10 0.01008 0.01008

0.01008

Vtb Volume of barium perchlorata titrant used for the blank, ml. Vt Volume of barium perchlorate t!trant used for the sample, ml (average or rdpli• Vsoln Total volume of solution in which the sulfur dioxide sample is contained, Va Volume of sample aliquot titrated, ml. N Normality of barium perchlorate titrant, milliequivalentJml. TEST RESULTS

OUTLET RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 METHOD 8 SO2 (Lbs/DSCF) SO2 (Lbs/Hr)

6.42518E-05

6.6015tE-05

7.6123E-05 47.71177452 46.46256953

50.2142141

Cso2 7.061"10-5

(Vt-Vtb)(Vsoln/Va)*N Vm(std) Cso2 Concentration

of sulfur dioxide, dry basis corrected to standard conditionsRun

Whitacre-

Crecr Fireproofing- PO04 Outlet MeterBox,d: MB-18 ProbelO 4p-I

Cold Test Date

9/20/2011 Observer: Jana Gannon Northeast District

10.88 28.85 O.lO 28.86

Avg. Ts F CO2 Fco= 02 N2+C 390 3.00 17.00 80.00

Md

Ms 29.]6 28.04
Bws S Bws 0.107 •4.543 IAssumed Bws: 10.000

PitotCk OK

1.0000 2,004 0.84 38,573 93.70 72.55 36.999 4.410

0.48 35.36 13,$35 23,083

Qsd dscfl• Points Dn 7.42E+05 20 0.315 Total Test time Time @ point 60 3.00

Leak Ck 0.999 6"(•0 Avg. DIh Test Time 1.467000 8:55-9:59 TRUE Time Point No. Me•r •0 dl "p" ITarget dl "h' Actual dl "h" Ts F F 0.00 397.44 0.19 1.20 1.20 374 70 3.00 399.160 0.21 1.32 1.30 378 70 6.00 401.130 0.20 1.25 1.30 383 71 9.00 403.020 0,22 1,37 1,40 385 71 12.00 404.950 0.15 0.94 0.94 383 71 15.00 406.550 0.19 1.20 1.20 375 71 18.00 408.310 0.22 1.37 1.40 386 72 21.00 410.260 0.25 1.56 1.60 389 72 24.00 412.390 0.26 1.61 1.60 391 72 27.00 414.460 0.26 1,61 1.60 394 72 30•0 416.140 &21 1.18 1.20 484 73 33.00 417.930 0.23 1.43 1.40 393 73 36.00 419,$70 0.24 1.49 1.50 394 73 39.00 421,850 0.25 1.55 1.60 396 73 42.00 423.790 0.27 1.67 1.70 396 74 45.00 425,830 0.18 1.13 1.10 383 74 48.00 427.480 0.20 1.26 1.30 380 74 51•0 429.220 0;27 1.6• 1.70 392 75 54.00 431.270 0.26 1.62 1.60 392 75 57.00 433.610 0.41 2.71 2.70 345 75 60.00 436.017 XAD Cond Temp F FilterTemp F ProbeTemp F Vacuum 61 248

261 50 248

260 45 249

261 44 249

260 43 247

261 42 248

264 43 247

•62 43 249

262 44 249

262 45 250

262 45 249

261 46 247

262 48 248

264 49 251

265 48 248

264 48 248

265 49 250

263 50 247

262 51 246

260 51 250

264

Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 568.7 577.9 679.0 633.2 601,7 580.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 888.6 853.2 Isoklnetics 100.3 Test Date 912012011

-9.245.821.70.00.00.035.4

PageRun 2

pO04 Outlet

Y •"' ce Vmcf Vie [Av•.TmF

Vmstd Vwstd 1.0000 2.004 0.84 37.201 81.70 76.60 35"4711 3.846 Avg. Sqrt # Sample Dip v, sefm wet aefm

Qsd dsefh Points Dn o..9 32.86 13,o09 21,449

7.04E+051

20 0.315 TRUE Time Point No. Meter(c 0 dl "p" Target AH Actual dl AH TsF tm F (in) XAD 0.00 446,469 0.15 0.95 0.95 377 74 3.00 448,250 0.12 0.76

0.76 382 74 6.00 449.680 0.17 1.07 I. 10 383 74 9.00 451.370 0,19 1.19 1.20 387 74 12.00 453.160 0,20 1.25 1.30 388 75 1£,00 454.950 0.19 1.21 1.20 375 75 18.00 456,810 0.22 1.38 1.40 386 75 21.00 458.730 0.20 1.25 1.30 390 76 24.00 460.490 0.23 1.43 1.40 393 76 27.00 462.380 0.25 1.56 1.60 395 76 30.00 464.330 0.20 1.26 1.30 388 77 33.00 466.250 0.27 1.70 1.70 385 77 36.00 468.270 0.26 1.64 1.60 387 78 39.00 470.420 0•22 1.41 A0 372 78 42.00 472,330 0,25 1.60 1.60 377 78 45.00 474.510 0.16 1.03 1.00 370 79 48.00 2 476.220 0.19 1.22 1.20 370 79 51.00 477.970 0.20 1.28 1.30 374 79 54.00 479.920 0.21 1.35 1.40 375 79 57.00 481.830 0.19 1.22 1.20 374 79 60.00 0 483.670 Test Date

9/20/2011 EPA Observer:

Jana Gannon Northeast District N2+C Md 80.00 29.16
Bws S Bws 0.098 13.192

0.999 Assumed Bws: 10.000 Total Test time Time @ point 60 3.00

Ms Pitot Ck 28.04 OK Leak Ck@.003

1.295500 Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacttum 52 246

263 46 248

262 43 248

260 42 250

263 40 249

266

3 39 251

267 39 247

266

3 41 249

264 42 250

268

3 42 246

262 43 249

266 44 251

262 46 247

268 50 249

269 51 246

267 47 247

264 48 245

266 SO 252

263 52 256

261 51 260

26£

Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end Wt. (start) Ic 604.9 620.2 -I 5.3 619,5 588.4 31.1 616.0 588.2 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 905.5 867.4 38.1
lsokinetles 101.3 Test Date 9/20/201

3

3

PageRun 3

Creer Fireprpofln•- p004 Outlet •ox Id: MB-18 Probe ID 4p-I

Cold BoxlD: 10
As ft^2 Pbar

P'

Av,.TsF

O' •o.s• :•.s• •.•0 :•.•9

3•. 3.00 •.00

Loooo •.004 0.•4 •.s04 s?.•o •0.•0 33.•4• 4. 28

TRUE Time Point No. Meter 0.00 497.43 3.00 499.120 6,00 500.810 9.00 502.570 12.00 504.220 15.00 506.190 18.00 2 507.920 21.00 509.770 24.00 511.690 27.00 513.540 30.00 515.610 33.00 517.390 36.00 519,310 39.00 521.330 42.00 523.380 45.00 525.330 48.00 526,920 51.00 528,520 54.O0 530,140 57.00 531.620 60.00 533.235 dl"p" target dl"h" Actual dl"h' Ts F tmF(in) 0.16 1,04 I.O0 361 78 0.15 0.97

0,97 363 78 0.17 1.09 1.10 372 78 0,14 0.90 0.90 376 79 0,20 1.28 1.30 378 79 0.19 1.22 1,20 371 79 0.[r8 1.14 1.10 384 79 0+21 1.32 1,30 390 80 0.22 1,39 1.40 387 80 0.25 1.58 1,60 389 81 0.19 1.22 1.20 378 81 0.22 1.39 1.40 388 81 0.25 1.58 1,60 392 81 0.24 t:52 1.50 392 82 0.20 1,26 1.30 392 82 0,14 0,89 0.89 384 82 0.15 0.95 0.95 393 82 0.14 0.88 0.88 3•3 82 0.12 0.76 0.76 393 83 0.15 0.95 0.95 395 83 XAD

Test Date

9/20/201 Observer: Jana Gannon Northeast District N2+C Md

Ms Pitot Ck 80.00 29,16

28.04

OK Bws S Bws

I•eak Ck 0.109 13.541

0.999

60 Assumed Bws:

0.000 Total Test time 60 3.00 1.165000 Cond Temp F FilterTemp F ProbeTemp F Vacuum 51 247

262 47 250

264 44 261

261 45 262

259

3 46 264

260 45 265

262 46 265

259 46 264

265 46 266

264 47 263

264 48 264

260 50 264

263 50 266

265 51 263

265 53 266

266 54 268

269 55 264

260 48 265

261 46 266

258 47 267

261

2 Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end• Wl. •slart) Ic 579.9 573.0 6.9 658.1 619.3 38.8 603.0 596,3 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 829.8 794.5 35.3 Isokinefics 103.4 Test Date 9/20/201

PageVISIBLE EMISSION

OBSERVATION

FORM SOURC• NAME ADDRESS
CITY
PHONE

CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERA TING MO•E
OPERA TING MODE
DESCRIBE EMISSION

POINT START f•.6t' S•.[L

STOP :•n'4. fiT. ABOVE GROUND LE•'EL

tiT, RELAT/VE

TO OBSERVER STARTA• STOP •P•"YXA.

START"•.•)

[ STOP •{. DISTANCE roOM OBSERVER

DIRECTION

roOM •OBSERVER

'SESCRmE BA C/<6RouND

BA CKGROUND

COLOR START •J&'• STOP,• WIND SPEED STOP START d
STOP •.,rM • 6 :PLUME TYP E CONTINUOUS_.

I7
IF WA TER' DROPLET

PLUME -'--t"9 A TTA CHED

DETACHED OPACITY WAS DETERMINED

STOP

NORTH ARROW

ADDITIONAL INFORMA

T/ON O•SER VAtION SEC 0 MIN

7

•0 15 30 START TiME

STOP TIME
,• SE__ !' o •

20 50
22 52 23 •3 24 •4 25 55 26 6657 •28 58 29 59 30 60 AVERAGE OPAC/TY

FQ•

NUMBER OF READ/NGS H/GHEST PERIOD

• ABOVE • % WERE RANGE OF. OPA CITY R•4D/NGS •MINIMUM

•AXIMUM OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT)VISIBLE EMISSION

OBSERVATION

FORM

ADDRESS
CITY -.. •TDTE U ZiP
PHONE SOURCE ID NUMBER PROCESS EQUIPMENT OPERA TING MODE
OPERA T/NO MODE

STOP HT. RE• TIVE TO O•SERVEk CONTROL EQUIPMENT

HT. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL START "•'•} STOP•..t't%J•.

START'••

STOP 'DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER

DIRECTION

FROM "OBSERVER OESCR/BE EMISS/•NS START" •'•.

STOP •

WATER DROPLETS

PRESENT NO •.. YES PT.'IN THE PLUME A T WHICH DESCRi#E BA'CKGROUND"
BACKGROUND COLOR START •J*'•f•TOP

•..fY•L. IT WATER DROPLET

PLUME 1-'•'9 ATTACHED DETACHED•

20 OPACITY WAS DETERMINED STOP •,'t•
STOPSKY CONDITIONS START#4•

STOP WIND SPEED START •/)\•ksToP AMBIENT TEMPERA

TURE

s ,-,.,', 4".....• Wind Plume & Stack<'

WIND DmECTION START 5 STOP: •. W#T BULB TEMPt RH percent

DRAW NORTH ARROW
•ssion POint •r•ers Position

Sun Loc•tio•e, ADDIT/ON•4L INFOR/•A

T/ON 6O

STOP TIME,/.; • •- •. 15 30 45

NUMBER OF REA DINGS Ot• DATE

START TIME

MIN O0"U UDO (gD

49

222324 54 25 55 26 56 2• •7 28 58

A VERA •E OPA CiTY FOR •/SHEST PERIOD

•)

A•OVE 0 • Ws•S O RANGE OF OPA CITY REA DINGS OBSER •ER'S NAME fPR/NTJ

VERIFIED BYTEST DATA

COMPANY NAME

Whitacre-Greer

Outlet Meth 26a ADDRESS 2411 State Route 516 NW CITY Dover ,TATE OH ZIP 66103 TEST METHODS

Methos 1-4 CREW MEMBERS

JeffP,Joe C LOCATION SOURCE CONTROL Outlet Outlet Meth 26a la•house

RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 9/21/2011 9/21/2011

9/21/2011 7:17-8:25 9:41-9:47

12:06-12:12 60 60.00

60.00 36.3 38.25

37.23 28.88 28.85

28.88 DATE TIMERUN LENGTH (min) VOLUME (cubic feet) Y FACTOR BAROMETRIC METER TEMP. (R) STACK TEMP. (R) AVERAGE ^P AVERAGE ^H IMPINGER VOLUME PITOTCOEF. STATIC PRESSURE STACK AREA NOZZLE SIZE(sq•) CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN 533.30 529.30 530.15 844.95 842.30

836.25 0.45 0.47

0.46 1.17 1.34

1.29 121.70 106.90

105.20 0.84 0.84

0.84 0.10 0.10

0.10 10.88 10.88

10.88 0.0005412 0.000541

0.000541 3.00 3.00

3.00 17.00 17.00

17.0080 80 80TEST DATA

OUTLET RUN #'1 RUN #2 RUN #3 METHOD 26A •.ICL (rag) CHLORINE (rag) HF (rag) 1.7

1,7 0;0•122.8

1.9 0.089 0.077 23.9 26.2TEST RESULTS

OUTLET RUN #1 RUN #2 RUN #3 VM (std) VW (std) BWS (measured) MDMSVS (fUsec) SCFH ACFM DCFMISbKINETIC % 35.68 35.04 36.84 5.73 5.04

4.96 0.141 0.120

0.122 29.16 29.16

29.16 27.81765723 27.59047926 27.7986472 33.04 34.87

33.82 670887,3996 726467.9832

708959.728 21566.16667 22764.5617

22076.1938 11181,45666 12107.79972

11815.99•5 105.070328t 102.0167672

101.240784 HC._•LLBS/HR 0.071765087

0.073913156

0.083242 LBS/DSCF 1.0697E-07

1.01743E-07

1.17414E-07 PPM 1.134603212

1.079159643

1.24537845 PPM (• 7% 02

4.043842215

3.846235652

4.43865653 CHLORINE LBS/HR 0.00168859

0.003869571

0.00337349 LBS/DSCF 2.51695E-09

5.32655E-09

4.75837E-09 PPM 0.013727572

0.029051291

0.02595238 H..ZFLBS/HR 0.962496465

1.039t32022

1.14786332 LBSIDSCF 1.43466E-06

1.43039E-06

1.61908E-06 PPM 27.73364994

27.65105913

31,298688

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions.
Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions,
Bws Stack moisture content. Md Determination

of dry molecular weight of stack gas.
Ms Determination

of stack gas molecular weight. Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ft/sec.)
ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity.
DCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. LbslHr Pounds per Hour. GrlDscf Grains per dry standard cubic feet.Run

Whilacre-Greer-

Oullel Moth 26a Box ld:

ProbelO 4P-I

ColdBoxID: EPAOb

10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89

385 3.00 17.00 80.00

0.9990 1,941 0.84 36,300 121.70 69.30 35.007 5.728 0.141 Assumed Bws: Avg. Sqrt Vs scfm acfm

Qsd dscflt Points Dn Total Test llme 0.447 32.77 12.906 21,391

6.65E+05

20 0.315

60 Test Date

9/21/2011

Md Ms Pitot Ck 29.16 28.04

OK S Bws

LeakCk 13.763 0.999 4"@0 10.000 Av•. DIh Test T, ime 3.00 1.171500 7:17-8:25 Time (•, point
TRUE Time Point No. Meter led d[ "p" Target dl "h" Actual dl "h" Ts F F lin) 0,00 473.21 0.14 0,84 0.82 388 68 3.00 474.760 0.24 1.47 1.40 367 68 6.00 476.770 0.21 1.27 1.20 377 68 9.00 478.610 0.20 1.21 1.20 380 68 12.00 480.380 0.21 .28 1.20 377 69 15.00 482.260 O. 13 0.79 0.77 380 69 18.00 483.820 O. 18 1.09 I. [0 3.77 69 2LO0 485.560 0.20 1.21 I,[0 384 69 24.00 487.420 0.22 1.32 1,30 388 69 27.00 489.320 0.24 1.44 1.40 388 69 30.00 491.320 0.16 0.96 0.94 386 70 33,00 492.830 O. 19 1, [5 1. 384 70 36.00 494.590 0.17 1.02 1.00 388 70 39.00 496.270 0.21 1.26 1.20 390 70 42.00 498.230 0.24 1.44 1.40 390 70 45.00 500.230 0.20 1.20 1.2,0 392 70 48.00 501.960 0.23 1.38 1.30 391 70 51.00 503.840 0.25 1.50 1.50 388 70 54.00 505.880 0.21 |,26 1.20 390 70 57.00 507.8 l0 O. 19 I. 13 I. 10 394 70 60.00 509.510 XAD Cond Temp F Fil•rTemp F Probe Temp F Vacuum 50 257

266 48 266

269 48 269

269 45 268

266 46 269

258 47 269

260 47 257

258 48 260

259 49 263

257 50 265

255 46 266

258 45 260

255 46 262

254 48 260

257 47 262

259 48 265

258 50 266

255 51 269

25• 53 260

259 54 259

264

Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 620.0 564.7 55.3 644,3 590.0 54,3 577.9 576.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 845.4 834.4 11.0 Isokinefics 105.8 Test Date 9/21/2011

PageRun 2

Whltaere-Greer- Outlet Meth 26a MeterBoxld:] ProbelD 4P-I

Cofd0oxlO:

15

EPAOb AS f'^2 Pba, Pq (static) Ps

Avl[. Ts F CO2- Fcm OZ N2+C 10.88 28.85 0.10 28.86

382 3,00 17.00 80.00 Y AH: Cp Vm cf Vie Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws 0.9990 1.94 0.84 38.250 106.90 70. 36.806 5.032 0.120 Assumed Bws: Avg. Sqrl Sample Dip Vs scfmwet acfm

qsddscfh

Points Dn TotalTesttlmeJ 0.474 34.73 13,708 22,673

7.24E+05

20 0,315

60 Test Date
Md29.16 S Bws 13,359 I0.000 Time (• point 3.00 9/21/2011

Ms PitotCk 28.04 OK Leak Ck 0.999 6"@c004 Avg. DIh Test Time 1.335000 9:4'-•:47 TRUE Time Point No. Meter(c0 dl "p" Target AH Actual dl AH TsF F/in 0,00 511.910 0,22 1.33 1,30 379 69 3.00 2 513.830 0.25 1.50

1,• 388 69 6.00 515.920 0.21 1.26 1.20 388 69 9.00 517.680 0.23 1,38 1.40 389 70 12.00 519.550 0.28 1.73 1.70 367 70 15.00 521.720 0,20 1.25 1.20 355 70 18.00 523.490 0.25 1.52 1.50 377 70 21.00 525,480 0.26 1.58 1,50 380 70 24.00 527.560 0.23 1.39 1.40 381 70 27.00 529.370 0.25 1.51 1.50 382 70 30.00 531.420 0.19 1.16 1.10 377 70 33.00 533.260 0.21 1,27 1.20 384 70 36.00 534,990 0.24 1.45 1,40 385 70 39.00 537.140 0.25 1.50 1.50 388 70 42.00 539.220 0.24 1.45 1.40 385 7l 45.00 541.030 0.18 1.09 1.10 38,7 71 48.00 2 542.690 0.20 1.20 1.20 390 71 SI.00 544.380 0.19 1.15 1.10 386 71 54.00 4 546.270 0.22 1.32 1.30 390 71 57.00 548.390 0.21 1.26 1.20 388 71 60.00 0 550.160 XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 47 258

260 44 267

261 45 262

260 46 268

261 46 266

262 45 262

264 47 265

261 48 264

263 50 266

264 49 267

261 49 256

260 51 261

259 5Z 266

26 53 262

265 55 259

264 56 261

267 58 266

269 51 263

266 51 260

268 52 260

265

Wt, (end) Wt. (start) Ic 620.0 572.0 48.0 638.5 596,9 41.6 3 594.1 591.8 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 890.5 875.5 15.0 Isokinetics 102.3 3 Test Date 9/21/20l

333

PageRun 3

Whitacre-Greer- Outlet Moth 26a Test Date Id: Observer: As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps

Avg. Ts F CO2 Fco O2 N2+C

Md 10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89

376 3.00 17.00

80.00

29.16
0.9990 1.941 0.84 37.230 105.20 73.30 35.646 4.952

0.122

12.429 •,ssumed Bws: 10.000 DIp Vs scfm wet acfm

Qsd dscfll Points Dn Total Test time Time C• point 0.461 33.67 13,399 21,979

7.06E+05

'•0 0.315

60

3.00

9/21/2011

Ms Pitot Ck 28.04 OK Leak Ck 0.999 8"(•0 Avg. DIh Test Time 1.290000 12:06-12:12 TRUE Time Point No, Meter (c0 dl "p" Target dl "h' Actual dl "h" Ts F tm F (in) 0.00 551.18 0.17 1.05 1.00 372 72 3.00 552.820 0.19 1.16

l.li 379 72 6.00 554.480 0.16 0.98 0.95 379 72 9.00 556,120 0.16 0.97 0.95 381 72 12.00 557,850 0,19 1.15 1.10 385 72 15.00 559.620 0.18 1.11 1.10 373 72 18.00 2 561.420 0.20 1.22 1.20 380 73 ZI,O0 563.330 0.22 1.34 1.30 380 73 24.00 565.080 0.20 1.22 1.20 382 73 •7.00 567.090 0.23 1.40 1.40 381 73 )0.00 568.970 0.17 1.05 1.00 372 74 )3.00 2 570.630 0.27 1.70 1.70 354 74 )6.00 572.590 0,24 1.49 1,50 369 74 )9.00 4 574.660 0.25 1,54 1.50 376 74 12.00 576.810 0.28 1.72 1.70 378 74 t5.00 578.850 0.21 1.31 1.30 365 74 18.00 580.610 0.25 1.53 1.50 378 74 31.00 582.620 0.26 1.59 1.60 379 74 34.00 584.790 0.24 1.47 1.40 382 75 37.00 586.570 0.22 1.35 1.30 380 75 $0.00 0 588.410 XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 3 Wt. (end) Wt. (start) 3 620.0 572.5 604.7 569.7 602.2 597.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 869.9 852.3 3 lsoklnetics

101.6 Test Date 9/21/2011

47.535.05.10,00.017.6 55 262

267 47 265

269 44 266

266 45 263

2•4 46 262

267 45 262

261 43 267

268 43 265

265 42 263

265 43 261

267 44 266

269 46 265

264 47 268

264 46 263

261 45 260

266 40 258

263 41 261

265 43 259

267 42 265

2•5 44 261

262

PageTEST DATA

COMPANYNAME Whitacre-Greer

Outlet Meth 29 ADDRESS 24'] State Route 516 NW CITY Dover STATE OH ZIP i6103 TEST METHODS

Methos 1-4 CREW MEMBERS

Jeff P,Joe C LOCATION Outlet SOURCE Outlet Meth 29 CONTROL

DATE TIMERUN LENGTH (min) VOLUME (cubic feet) Y FACTOR BAROMETRIC METER TEMP. (R) STACK TEMP. (R) AVERAGE ^P AVERAGE ^H IMPINGER VOLUME PITOT COEF. STATIC PRESSURE STACK AREA NOZZLE SIZE(sq/ff) CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN

Ba•house
RUN#1

:•UN #2 9/21/2011 RUN #3 9/21/2011 9/21/2011 7:15-9:22 9:40-11:48

12:05-14:12 120 120.00

120.00 72.75 75.47

74.71 28.88 28.85

28.88 528.00 532.50

536.00 841.60 843.050.47

80 80

838.650.47 0.471.29 1.32

1.34 221.70 206.50

201.00 0.84 0.84

0.84 0.10 0.10

0.10 10.88 10.88

10.88 0.0005412 0.000541

0.000541 3.00 3.00

3.00 17.00 17.00

17.0080TEST RESULTS

VM (std) VW (std) BWS (measured) MDMSVS (ft/sec) SCFH ACFM DCFMilSOKINETIC %

OUTLET RUN#1

RUN#2

RUN#3 70.42, 72.37

71.25 10.45 9.73

9.47 0.129 0.119

0.117 29.16 29.16

29.16 27.71832703 27.83726651

27.8505118 34.48 34.29 34.66 722829.7044 724534.502 708534.3468 22387.61077 22625.53021

22606.7947 11808.90578 12047.16174

12075.575 99.96902046 100.6982794

98.9076957

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions.
Bws Stack moisture contenL Md Determination

of dry molecular weight of stack gas. Ms Determination

of stack gas molecular weight. Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ftJsec.) ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. IDCFM Dry standard cubic feet per'minute of gas velocity.TEST DATA

COMPANY NAME

Whitacre-Greer

Outlet Meth 29 ADDRESS 2411 State Route 516 NW CITY Dover STATE OH ZIP 66103 TEST METHODS

Methos 1-4 CREW MEMBERS

JeffP,Joe C LOCATION Outlet SOURCE Outlet Meth 29 CONTROL Bag•aouse

DATE TIMERUN LENGTH (min) VOLUME (cubic feet) Y FACTOR BAROMETRIC METER TEMP, (R) STACK TEMP. (R) AVERAGE ^P AVERAGE ^H IMPINGER VOLUME PITOT COEF. STATIC PRESSURE STACK AREA NOZZLE SIZE (sqlft) CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN NITROGEN

RUN #19/21/2011 :•UN #29/21/2011 RUN #3 9/21/2011 7:15-9:22 9:40-11:48

12:05-14:12 120 120.00

120.00 72.75 75.47

74.71 28.85532.50 28.88 528.00 841.60 843.05 0.47 0.47 1.29 1.32 221.70 206.500.84

28.88 536.00 838.650.471.34201.00 0.84 0.84 0.10 0.10

0.10 10.88 10.88

10.88 0.0005412 0.000541

0.000541 3.00 3.00 17.00 3.0017.00 17.00 80 80

80TEST RESULTS

VM (std) vw (std) BWS (measured) MDMSVS (ft/sec) SCFH ACFM DCFM ISOKINETIC %

OUTLET RUN#t

RUN#2 70.42 72.37

34.29 •UN #371.25 10.45 9.73

9.47 0.129 0.119

0.117 29,16 29.16

29.t6 27.71832703 27.83726651

27.8505118 34.66 34.48 708634,3468 722829.7044

724534.502 22506.7947 22387.61077 22625.53021 11808.90578 12047.16174

12075.575 99.96902046 100.6982794

98.9076957

Vm (std) Volume of gas sampled at standard conditions. Vw (std) Volume of water vapor collected at standard conditions.
Bws Stack moisture content. Md Determination

of dry molecular weight of stack gas. Ms Determination

of stack gas molecular weight. Vs Average gas stack velocity. (ft/sec.)
ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute of gas velocity. IDCFM Dry standard

per

gas cubic feet minute of velocity.TEST DATA

RUN

#1 METHOD 29 !Mercury ..(mg) 0,0289 RUN #2 RUN #3

0.0131 0.0413
TEST RESULTS

OUTLET RUN

#1 METHOD 29 Mercury (mg/dscm) Mercury ,(mg/dscm @ 7% 02)

0.014491 0.051646

RUN #2 RUN #3

0.00639 0.0205 0.02278 0.0729

mgldscm Cs

Mtl K4 Vmstd

Cs Concentration

of a metal in the stack gas, mgldscm; K4 10-3 mg/ug.
Mt Total mass of that metal collected in the sampling train, ug0
Vmstd Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to dry standard conditions,

dscm.TEST RESULTS

Lbs/Hr
2.205 10 • scfhVm std Mt 2,205

10 ^-6 Conversion from mg to Ibs. Standard stack volumetric

flow rate. Volume of air sampled at stp. Total mass of that metal collected in the sampling traln, mg

Mt

scfh Vmstd RUN #1 .RUN #2. RUN #•3 2.205,* 10^-6 2.205 lO^-6 2.205 lO^-6 708534.35 722829.7

724534.5 70.42 72.37

71.25
Mercury 0.000641131

0.000288512

0.00092605TEST RESULTS

Ibs/dscf Mercury RUN #1

9.04869E-10 RUN #2

3.99142E-10 RUN #3

1.27813E-09 mg/dscm

Vm std Mt Cs

Volume of air sampled at stp. Total mass ,of that metal collected in the sampling train, ug. Mt 10 ^-3 Vm std .02832RUN #1 70.423977 RUN#2 72.368946

RUN #____•3 71.249752Run

•hitacre-Greer.

Outlet Meth 29 MeterBoxld: MB-I8 ProbelD 4p-2

ColdSoxlo:J EPAOb

10.88 28.88 0.10 28.89

382 3.00 17.00 80,00

1.0000 2.004 0.84 72.750 221.70 68.00 70.424 10.435

0.129 Assumed Bws: Vs scfm wet acfm

Qsd dscfl• Points Dn Total Test time 0.466 34,10 13,482 22,257

7.05E+05

20 0.315

120 Tost Dale

9/21/201

Md29.16
Bws 13.237 I0,000 Time @ point 6.00 Ms Pitot Ck 28.04 OK Leak Ck 0.999 5"(•.•.002 Ave. DIh Test Time 1.291500 7:15-9:22 TRUE Time Point No. Meter Ic 0 dl "p" Target dl "h' Actual dl "h" TsF F (in) 0.00 546,17 0.16 0.99 0.93 386 66 6.00 549.280 0,25 1.58 1.50 367 66 12.00 553.160 0.23 1.43 L40 378 66 18.00 556.790 0.22 1.37 1.30 376 66 24.00 560.390 0.25 1.56 1,50 380 67 30.00 564,270 0,19 I. 18 1. 381 67 36.00 567.580 0.18 1.12 1,20 381 67 42.00 570.810 0.20 1.24 1.20 384 67 48.00 574.340 0,21 1.30 1.20 386 68 54.00 577.940 0.23 1.42 1.30 388 68 60.00 581.960 0.18 1. I. 10 390 68 66.00 585,330 0.22 1.36 1.30 385 68 72.00 588,950 0.24 1,48 1.40 388 68 78.00 592.680 0.26 1.63 1.50 378 68 84.00 596.580 0.28 1.75 1.70 381 70 90.00 600.670 0,24 1.50 1.40 380 70 96.00 604.490 0.21 1.31 .20 381 70 102.00 607.950 0.19 1.19 1.10 379 70 108.00 611,530 0.20 1.25 1.20 3•1 70 114.00 615.250 0.22 1,37 1.30 382 70 120.00 618.920 XAD Cond ,Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum 49 250

255 42 255

257 39 257

258 40 253

259 42 255

261 44 255

263 45 258

264 47 256

265 48 259

266 50 260

269 53 262

266 53 264

267 •4 265

269 55 267

270 57 262

265 52 266

269 51 265

270 49 268

266 47 265

268 45 266

269

Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 720.0 564.7 155.3 644.3 590.0 54.3 577.9 576.8 1. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 845.4 834.4 11.0 Isoklneti•s lOO.S Test Dale 9/21/20]

PageRun 2

Whltacre-Greer- Outlet Meth 29 Meter•ox•d: M•-IS ProbelD 4p.2

comsox=o: EPAObserver: As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps

.Avg. Ts F CO2 Fcm 02 N2+C I0.88 28.85 0.10 28,86

383 3.00 17.00 80.00 Y AH Cp Vm cf VIc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws 1.0000 2,004 0.84 75,470 206. 50 72.50 72.369 9,720 O. 118 Assumed Bws: Avg. Sqrt #Sample mp vs scfm wet acfm

qsd dsefl= Points Dn 0.471 34.53 13,617 22,542

7,20E+05

20 0.315

120 TRUE Time Point No. Meter (ct) dl "p" Target AH Actual dl All Ts F F (in) XAD 0.00 619.520 0.20 1,24 1.20 388 71 6.00 622.910 0.22 1.38

1.3 383 71 12.00 626.810 0.26 1.62 1.50 384 71 18.00 630.720 0.29 1.85 1.70 368 71 24.00 634.980 0.24 1.51 1.40 377 71 30.00 638.820 0.23 1,45 1,40 378 72 36.00 642.690 0,26 1.63 1.50 380 72 t2.00 646.580 0,22 1,38 1.30 381 72 tS.00 650.180 0.20 1.25 1.20 383 72 653.490 0.19 1.19 1.10 384 •4.00 72 •0.00 657,360 0.23 1.44 1.40 386 73 •6.00 660.950 0.25 1.56 1.50 388 73 72.0,0 664,880 0.24 1.49 1.40 390 73 78.00 668.590 0.19 1.18 I. 10 389 73 •4.00 672.360 0.17 1.06 1.00 390 73 •0.00 676.020 0.21 1.31 1.20 388 74 •6.00 680.050 0.22 1.38 1.30 385 74 02.00 684.070 0.26 1.62 1.50 390 74 08.00 687.920 0.20 1.27 1.20 374 74 14.00 691,920 0.18 I. 14 1.10 375 74 20.00 694.990 Test Date

9/2112011

Total Test time

Cond Temp F Md

Ms Pilot Ck 29.16 28.04

OK S Bws

Leak Ck 13.476 0.999 5"(•.00 10.000 Time (• point Avg. DIh Test Time 6.00 1.315000 9:40-11:48 Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected 605552 255

259 257 263 252 258 48 256

260 47 254

262 45 255

260 44 258

263 46 259

265 46 260 47 257 45 258

268264265 40 261

268 40 263

269 41 257

262 40 259

266 40 261

264 39 263

267 40 262

269 41 258

265 40 255

266

Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 719.6 572.0 147.6 638.5 596.9 41.6 594.1 591.8 2.3 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 890.5 875.5 15.0 l,oklnellcs 101.0 Test Date 9/21/2011

PageRun 3

Outlet Meth 29 Meteraoxld: MB-18 Pr°belD 4P-2

co•o•o:l •p•o6 A,f,^2 Vber IPq('tet01

•'

•vg.T, FICO•-•o,I

O• •o.ss zs.ss o,•o •s.s•

• •.oo 1•.oo

so.oo
v •": cp Vm•r •* Avg. Tm F Vmstd Vwstd

Bws 1,0000 2.•4 0.84 74.710 201.00 76.00 71.250 9.461

0.117 Assumed Avg. Sq, g Sample DIp Vs scfm acfm

Qsd dsc• Points Dn TotaIT•t time 0.470 34.36 13,634 22,429

7.22E•5

20 0.315

120 TRUE Test Date
Md29.16 S Bws 12.786 10.000 Time,point 6.00

9/21/2011

Ms Pitot Ck 28.04 OK Leak Ck 0.999 •0 Avg. DIh Test Time 1.335000 2:05-14:2 Time Point No. Meter (cO dl '"p" Target dl %" Actual dl "h" Ts F F (in) 0.00 695.67 0.23 1.47 1.40 372 75 6.00 699.310 0.20 1.27

1.2 378 75 12.00 703.050 0.24 1:51 1.40 382 75 18.00 706.870 0.26 1.64 1,60 383 75 Z4.00 710.690 0,23 1.45 1.40 383 75 30.00 714.340 0.15 0.96 0.90 374 75 36.00 717.480 0.21 1.37 1,.30 355 75 42.00 720.940 0.20 1.28 1,20 370 76 48.00 724.090 0.24 1.54 1.50 370 76 54.00 728.390 0.22 1.40 1.30 376 76 60.00 732.610 0.26, •66 1.60 375 76 66.00 736.510 0.25 1.57 1.50 379 76 72.00 740.350 0.20 1.27 1.20 381 76 78.00 4 743,820 0.23 1.46 1.40 380 77 84.00 747.250 0.20 1.27 1.20 382 77 90.00 751.390 0.22 1.39 1.30 383 77 96.00 755,020 0.26 1.64 .,50 387 77 102.00 759.470 0.24 1.51 1.40 389 77 108.00 763.240 0.21 1.32 1.30 388 77 14.00 766.71 O, O. 19 1.20 1.10 386 77 120.00 0 770.380 XAD Cond Temp F Filter Temp F Probe Temp F Vacuum Imp. Liquid Collected Wt. (end) Wt. (start) Ic 715.8 572.5 143.3 604.7 569.7 35.0 602.2 597. 5. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 869.9 852.3 17.6 isoklnetics 99.2 Test Date 9/21/2011 58 255

262

3 52 259

267 45 260

265 45 257

26• 43 253

267

• 42 252

261 43 255

263 43 256

266

3 44 256

269 45 257

261 48 252

263

4 47 258

265

4 49 257

265 46 254

266 47 256

264

3 48 259

267 49 2S5

263 51 257

268 • 260

266 55 262

264

3

PageLaborator DataLab

Data Sheet For.

Whitacre- Creer Fireproofing

P004 Outlet By:
Moisture Weights Moisture ml ml

ml ml ml

ml rams Box ID

2

3 4 5 6 (•ri•dte 568.7 679.0

601.7

0.0 0.0

0.0 888.6 577.9 633.2

580.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 853.2 -9.2 45.8

21.7

0.0 0.0

0.0 35.4 Rea•lent H20

H20

H20 H20 mLs 100.0

100.0

100.0 100.0 Intial Imp mL 300.0ml

ml Box ID

2 604.9 619.5 2 620.,2

588.4 -15.3 31,1 Rea•tent H2,O

H20 mLs 100.0

100.0 mL

mL Impin•ler Total

58.3 Total

93.7 ml ml ml

ml rams 3 4 5 6 I•rietite 616,0 0.0 0.0

0.0 905.5 588.2 0.0 0.0

0.0 867.4 27, 8 0.0 0.0

0.0 38.1 H20 H20 100.0 100.0
Intial Imp mL 300,0

Impin•ler Total mL mL

mL

ml Box ID

2

3 4 Gross 579.9

658.1

603.0

0.0 Tare 10 573.0

619.3

596.3

0.0 Net 6.9 38.8

6.7 0.0 Rea•lent H20

H20

H20 H20 mLs 100.0

100.0

100.0 100.0

mL

mL 43.6 Total

81.7 ml ml rams 5 6 "l•rierite 0.0 0.0 829.8 0,0 0.0 794.5 0.0 0.0 35.3

Intial Imp mL 300.0 mL

mL Impinger Total

52,4 Total

87.7

Joe Crowe

Scale Serial #

1203240794 Conditions: InitialPost

Temp

RH Date

Pb 66 49 911912011

28.73 79 52 9/20/2011

28.88TITRATION DATA SHEET

SAMPLE LOCATION

$'•,.,'./•/

/Z,'/,-,

•9•,//•/-- DATE

TITRATION FOR STANDARD aS:• •AN• • .!

2 ./

3 2 • •2_ 3 2• 2_

SAMPLE RUN
2.3 TOTAL VOLUME

ALOQUOT QOLUME
/0 TITRANT VOLUME

33,0

REMARKSLab

Data Sheet For:

Whitacre- Creer Fireproofing P004 Outlet

By:

Joe Crowe
Probe Rinse Wei•lht Run #

Temp RH Bammetd(•

Time Date Gross Temp RH Barometric

Time Date Tare Net Gain 59 55 25.14 / 8:19 1011312011 117057.1

59 50 28.59 ,t 5:15 19/23/20111117027.11

30 72 84 28.•0 / 17:17 1011312011 117087.1

•1 53 28.• ] 14:22 •z•o• •70•7 •0.• AVG 30.05 • se ss 2•'•4 •:22 •o/•20•l•e4s3.21

6• so •8'so s:•7 10/2•20•1•427.41

2s.s 2 72 64 28.20 1•:19 1011312011 119453.2

71 63 28.• 14:25 912312011 119427.3 25.9 AVG 25.85 3 69 56 28,14 8:23 1011312011 101043.1

69 60 28.59 8:19 9/2312011 100994.8 48,3 3 72 64 28.20 17:20 10/13/2011 101•3,1

71 63 28.• 1•:27 9123/2011 1009•.8 48.3 AVG 48.3 S•le Serial #

08204 Total Gain

104,2Lab

Data Sheet For:.

Whitacre- Creer Fireproofin•l

P004 Outlet

By:

Joe Crowe Filter Weight Run# ID# Temp RH IBaromevi•

Time Date Gross Temp RH Barometdc• Time Date Tare NetGain 1758 69 56 28.14 | 8:15 10/13/2011 201•8,6 68 53 28.64 | 8:23 9/6/2011 20101 57.6 175• 72 64 28.20 | 17:32 10/13/2011 20158.6 73 58 28.65 | 16:45 91612011 20101 57,6 AVG 57.6 2 1753 69 56 28.14 8:17 1011 •/2011 20522.7 68 53 28.64 8:00 91612011 20474 48.7 2 1753 72 64 28.20 17:35 10/13/2011 20522.7 73 58 28.65 16:27 9/6/2011 '20473.9 48.8 AVG 48.75 3 1738 69 56 28.14 8:13 1011312011 20152.1 68 52 28.63 5:50 811912011 20103.9 482 3 1738 72 64 28.20 17:30 10/1•/2011 20152.1 73 58 28.56 1'4:13 8•19/2011 201•)3.9 48.2 AVG 48.2 Scale Sedal #

08204 Total Gain

154.55Lab

Data Sheet For:

Whitacre-Greer

Outlet Meth 26a By:

Joe Crowe Moisture Weights

ml

ml Box ID

2 Gross 620.0

644.3 Tare 5 564.7

590.0 Net 55.3

54.3 Intial Imp mL 200,0ml

ml Box ID

2 Gross 620.0

638.5 Tare 8 572.0

596.9 Net 48.0

41.6
Intial Imp mL 200.0mL

mL Box ID

2 Gross 620.0

604.7 Tare 0 572.5

569.7 Net 47,5

35.0
Intial Imp mL 200.0

Moisture ml ml ml

ml

"ares 3 4 5 6 Drierite 577.9 0.0 0.0

0.0 845.4 576.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 834.4 1.1 0.0 0.0

0.0 11.0 mL mL Impinger Total

110.7 Total

121.7 ml ml ml

ml rams 3 4 5 6 l•rierite 594.1 0.0 0.0

0.0 890.5 591.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 875.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 mL mL Impin•er Total

91.9 Total

106.9 mL ml ml

ml rams 3 4 5 6 I•dedte 602.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 869.9 597.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 852.3 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 mL mL Impinger Total

87.6 Total

105.2Lab

Data Sheet For:

Whitacre-Greer

Outlet Meth 29 By:

Joe Crowe
Moisture Weights

ml

ml Box ID

2 Gross 720.0

644.3 Tare 5 564.7

590.0 Net 155.3

54.3
Intial Imp mL 200.0ml

ml Box ID ,1

2 =• Gross

719.6

638.5 zD Tare 8 572.0

596.9 Net 147.6

41,6 Intial Imp mL 200.0mL

mL Box ID

2 Gross 715.8

604.7 Tare 0 572.5

569.7 Net 143.3

35.0
Intial Imp mL 200.0

Moisture ml ml ml

ml rams 3 4 5

6 Drier•e 577.9 0.0 0.0

0.0 845.4 576.8 0.0 0.0

0.0 83,4.4 1.1 0.0 0.0

0.0 11.0 mL mL Impin•ler Total

210.7 Total

221.7 ml ml ml

ml

'ams 3 4, 5

6 Drierite 5,94.1 0.0 0.0

0.0 89.0.5 59!,• 0.0 0.0

0.0 875.5 2.3 0.0 0.0

0.0 15.0 mL mL Impin•ler Total

191.5 Total

206.5 mL ml ml

ml rams 3 4 5 6 Drierite 602.2 0.0 0.0

0.0 8,69.9 597.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 852.3 5,1 0.0 0.0

0.0 17.6 mL mL Impinger Total

183.4 Total

201Columbia Analytical Services 1317 S. 13 Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626

360.577.7222

360.636.1068

(fax) www.caslab.com

November 4, 20! Analytical

Report for Service Request

No: KI 109036 Walt Mummert

III Custom Stack Analysis,

LLC. 14614 Cenfiled

St. N.E. Alliance, OH 44601 RE: Whitacre-Greer

Fireproofing

Company Dear Walt: Enclosed are the results of the samples

submitted

to our laboratory

on September

23, 201 l. For your reference, these analyses

have been assigned

our service request number K1109036. Analyses were performed

according

to our laboratory's

NELAP-approved

quality assurance

program. The test results meet requirements

&the current NELAP

standards,

where applicable,

and except as noted in the laboratory

case narrative

provided.

For a specific list ofNELAP-accredited anatytes,

refer to the certifications

section at www.caslab.com.

All results are intended

to be considered

in their entirety, and Columbia

Analytical

Services,

Inc. (CA.S) is not responsible

for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items submitted

to the laboratory

for analysis and individual items (samples)

analyzed,

as listed in the report. Please call if you have any questions.

My extension

is .3291. You may also contact me via Email at EWallace@caslab. co m. Respectfully submitted, Columbia Analytical

ServiCes,

Inc. Project Chemist t W/jw Page ofASTM A2LA CARB CAS

Number CFCCFUDECDEQDHSDOEDOHEPAELAP GCGC/MS LUFT MMCL
MDLMPNMRLNANCNCASI NDNIOSH PQLRCRA SIMTPH Acronyms American Society for Testing and Materials American Association

for Laboratory

Accreditation California Air Resources

Bom'd Chemical Abstract

Service registry Number Chlorofluorocarbon Colony-Forming Unit Department of Environmental

Conservation Department of Environmental

Quality Department of Health Services Department of Ecology Department of Health U. S. Environmental

Protection

Agency Environmental Laboratory

Accreditation

Program Gas Chromatography Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Leaking Underground

Fuel Tank Modified Maximum Contaminant

Level is the highest

permissible

concentration

of a substance allowed in drinking

water as established

by the USEPA. Method Detection

Limit Most Probable

Number Method Reporting

Limit Not Applicable Not Calculated National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement Not Detected National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health Practical Quantitation

Limit Resource Conservation

and Recovery

Act Selected Ion Monitoring Total Petroleum

Hydrocarbons Trace level is the concentration

of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or equal to the MDL.

2Inorganic Data Qualifiers The result is an outlier. See case narrative. # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See narrative. B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result defined by the DOD NELAC standards. E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range. J The result is estimated value. LI The analyte was analyzed tbr, but was not detected ("Non-detect")

at or above the MRIdMDL. DOD-QSM 4. definition Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The detcetionlimit is adiusted for dilution. The MRUMDL

LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference. X See case narrative. Q see case narrative. One quality control criteria was outside the limits. H The holding time for this test is immediately following sample collection. The samples

analyzed

possible after receipt by the laboratory.

Metals Data Qualifiers # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative. J The result is estimated value. E The percent difference for the serial dilution was gn'•ter than 10%, indicating possible matrix interference in the sample. M The duplicate injection precision was not met. N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. Sce case narrative. $ The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).. L1 The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect")

at or above the MRL/MDL, DOD-QSM 4. definition Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adjusted for dilution. W The post-digestion

spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike absorbance. The MRLtMDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to matrix interference. X Sac ease narrative. + The correlation coefficient for the MSA islesa than 0.995. Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria outside the limits. Organic Data Qualifiers The result is an outlier. Se• case narrative. # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See narrative. A A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol-condensation

product. B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the DOD or NELAC standards. C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data. D The reported result is from dilution. E The result is an estimated value. J The result is an estimated value. N The result is presumptive. The analyte tentatively identified, but confirmation analysis was not performed. The GC HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two P analytical results. U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detaeted ("Non-detaet")

at or above the MRL/MDL. DOD-QSM 4.1 definition Analyte was not detected and is reported less than the LeD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adiusted for dilution. The MR.I./MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a chromatographic

interference. X See ease narrative. Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits. Additional Petroleum

Hydrocarbon

Specific Qualifiers F The chromatographic

fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard. L The chromatographic

fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of greater amount of lighter molecular weight constiluents than the calibration standard. I-] The chromatographic

fingerprint of the sample resamble• a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of greater amounl of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard. O The chromatographic

fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard. Y The chromatographic

finkerprint of the sample resembles petroleum product eluting in approximately

the con'ect carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard. Z The chromatographic

fingerprint does not resemble pen'oleum product.

3Columbia Analytical

Services,

Inc. Kelso, WA State Certifications,

Accreditations,

and Licenses
Agency Alaska DEC UST Arizona DHS Arkansas DEQ California DHS Number UST-040 AZ0339 88-0637 2286 Florida DOH E87412 Hawaii DOH Idaho DHW Indiana DOH C-WA-01 Louisiana DEQ 3016 Louisiana DHH LA050010 Maine DHS WA0035 Michigan DEQ 9949 Minnesota DOH 053-999-368 Montana DPHHS CERT0047 Nevada DEP New Jersey DEP New Mexico ED North Carolina

DWQ Oklahoma DEQ Oregon DEQ South Carolina

DHEC Washington DOE Wisconsin DNR Wyoming (EPA Region 8)

WA35 WA005 6O59801WA100010 61002 C1203 998386840

ACILCOLUMBIA ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC.

Client: Custom. Stack Analysis Service Request No.:

K1109036 Project: Whitacre-Greer

Fireproofing

Company

Date Received:

9/23/11 Sample Matrix:

Water

CASE NARRATIVE

All analyses were pertbm, ed consistent

with the qtmli.W assunmce

program of Columbia

Analytical

Services, Inc. (CAS). This report contains analytical results for samples designated

for Tier II data deliverables.

Wh.en appropriate

to the method, method bl'ank results have been reported with each maalytic•fl

test. Additional

quality control analyses reported herein include: Labom.to .ry Duplicate

(DUP), Matrix Spike (MS), and Laboratory.

Control Sample (LCS). ,S.•un pie Receipt Thirty-two samples were received for an.ab, sis at Columbia

Analytical.

Services on 9/23/11. The samples were received in good condition and consistea•t

with the accompanying

chain of custody form. Tile smnples were stored at room temperature

upon receipt at the laboratory. Gener:d Chemistry

P,'u'ameters No anomalies

with lhe analysis of these samples were observed. T!!tal Metals Matrix Spike Recovery

Exceptions: The control criteria, for malrix spike recovery of Mercury for sample Wbitacre-Greer

Back l-k•lf Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 2B) were uot applicable.

The analsCe concen•afion

in the sample was sigaaificantly

higher them the added spike concentration, preventing

accurate evaluation

of the spike recover).,.x x x

x x x Method 29: Mercury

Each Run is a separate sample. They are no_.Jt to be combine{X

Each Run is a separate sample. They are no__._•t to be combined. / 0

m

Method 26A: HCL, Hydrofluoric Acid and ChlorineColumbia Analytical

Services,

Inc. /• 'l_ ([• Cooler Receipt

and Preservation

Form Received:" b)l•.•l i

Opened:-

q/•zq]] .fi•rvic•RequestKll /
..•"-• ,

By:..//-f

Unloaded:

•'/•.'/

,y:•

I. Smnples were received via? Mail ••

UPS

DHL/ PDX Courier

Ha•td Delivered 2. Samples were received in: (circle) ••

Box

Envelope

•her NA 3. Were custody seals on coolers?

NA Y @

If yes, how m•y •d where? If present, were custody seals in•ct?

Y N

• preseng were flaey signed •d •ted?

Y N

7. Pacing n•tefial used. Insets Baggies Gel Packs W• Ice Sle•es Other 8. Were custody papers properly filled out (i•, si•ed, etc.)? NA • N 9. Did all bottles •ve in good condition

(•broken)?

Indicate in the table below. NA • N 10. Were all smnple labels complete (i.e •ysis, prese•adon,

etc.)? NA • N 11. Did •1 smnple labels •d tags agee wifla custody papers? Indicate major discrepancies

in the tab& on page 2. NA Y • 12. Were appropriate

bottles/containers

•d volumes received for fl•e tests in,cared? NA • N 13. Were fl•e pH-prese•ed

bo•les (see SMO GEN SOP) received at •e appropdate

pH? Indicate in the table below

• Y N 14. Were VOA vials received wiflmut headspace?

Indicate in the table below. • Y N 15. Was C12•es ne•five? Y N

Notes, Discrepancies,

& Resolutions:

Page 1 of_Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. AnMyfic.al Repot1 Custom Stack Analysi,s. LLC. Whilacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request: K1109036 Date Collected:

9/21:201 Date Received:

9/23/2011 Date Ext|'aeted:

NA h•organic Paramelcrs Unils: Total milligrams Analylo: EPA Molhod: Mothod Roporling Limit: Dalo Analyzod:

Volume of Bottle

Chloride 26 10/312¢} Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Conl#4 Run# Whitacre-Greer Conl#4 Rtm#2 Whitaere-Greer Cont#4 R.un#3 Whila+re-Grcer Conttl7 20Oral .IN NAOH BI,ANK Method Blank Lab Code K 109036.028 K 109036.029 K1109036-030 K 11 ¢19036.032 K1109036-MB

248246248196

0,040 0J)89 0.077 -::0.020

AD•,W0•I •;94

qClient;Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analylical Reporl Custom Slack Analysis. LLC. Whilacre-Orecr Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request: K1109036 Date Collected:

9/211201 Date Received:

9/23i201 Date Extracted:

NA Inorganic Parameters Uuils: Toial milligrams
Anal)ae: EPA Mcll•od: Mclhod Rcporli|•g Limil: Dale Analyzed:

Volume of Bottle

HCL26oi3/2()1 Sample Name Whilacre-Greer Conlfl3 Run# Whitacrc.Grcer Contfl3 Runfl2 Whilacrc-Orccr Coal//3 Run/t3 Whilacre-Greer Coal//6 2011ml. N H2SO4 BLANK Method Blank Lab Code KI109036-025 KI109036-026 KII09036-027 KI109036-031 KII09036-MB

246248249200

1.71.71.9-"0.02 --:0.020

Kllflgn36wekls.I Te*'ls 11/912f111Client: Project: LCS

Matrix:

Analyte Chloride COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES•

INC. QA/QC Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request:

K 1109036 Dat,e Collected:

NA Date Received:

NA Date Extracted:

NA Date Analyzed:

10/03/11 Laboratory Control Sample Summary Chloride EPA Method 26 Units: mg/L (ppm)

EPA True Method Value

Result

Percent Recovery

CAS Percent Recovery Acceptance Limits 26 •.1

6.55

92

85-115

LCS/102194 l•110¢)036weLBI LC$ 101412011 10 P,• No.-Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC, Analytioal Report Custom Stack Az•alysis, LLC. Whitacre-Oreer Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

9/21/201 Date Received:

9/23/2011 Date Extracted:

NA Inorganic Parameters Units: Total milligrams Analyte: Standard Method: Method Reporling Limit: Date Analyzed:

Volume of Bottle

HF 4500-F-C 11/8/2011 Sample Name Whilaore-Oreer Coal#3 Run#1 Whitaoro-Greor Coat#3 Run#2 Whitaore-Groer Conff/3 Run#3 Whitaore-Groer Coat#6 200ml .IN H2SO4 BLANK Method Blank Lab Code KI109036-025 K1109036-026 KII09036-027 K1109036.031 KlI09036-MB

248246248196

22.823.926.2<0.04 <0.04

3A DW/061694

g110903t•wal.l•2

3_']'¢• 1/9/2011COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC.
Client: Project: Sample Matrix: QA/QC Roporl Cuslom Slack Analysis. LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water Serwice Request: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Duplicate Summer 3, Fluoride Standard Method 4500-F-C Unils: Tolal milligrams K 1109036 9/21/2011 09/23/11 NA11/08/I

Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Cont#3 Run#

Lab Code K 09036-t325I)UP

MRL0.04 Sample Result22,8 Duplicate Sample Result22.9

Average 22.8

Relative Percent Difference <1

DUPIA/10219/1 Ki 109036wel,ls2 DUP 111912011 Page No.:Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. QA/QC Repor! Custom Stack Analysis. LLC. Whilaere-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water

Matrix Spike Summary Fluoride Standard Method 4500-F-C Units: Tola] milligrams

Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Cont#3 Run#

Lab Code 109036-025MS

MRL<0.04 SpikeLevel12.9 Sample Result22.8

SpikedSample Result35.2 Service Request: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed:

Percent Recovery 96

K 1109036 9/21/2O 11 9/23/20 NA11/8/2011

CAS Percent Recovery Acceptance Limits 75-t25

MSIMI02194 K1109036wel,ls] MS 1119/2011 Pa.•e Nn..Client: Project: LCS

Matrix:

Analyte Fluoride COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. QA/QC Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request:

K 109036 Date Collected:

NA Date Received:

NA Date Extracted:

NA Date Analyzed:

11/08/11 Laboratory Control Sample Summary Fluoride Standard Method 4500-F-C Units: mg/L (ppm)

True Percent Value Result

Recovery

CAS Percent Recovery Acceptance Limits
1.0 11.2

102

85-115

I,('S,'102 Iq4

K It]•lfx•el Ix2 LCTS I/OI201 Pa,,ae NoClient: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analytical Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-G•'eer Fireproofing

Company Misc. Service Request: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Total Mercury EPA Method 29/7470A Units: Micrograms

(l•g) (Field Blank Corrected) K1109036 09/21/I 09/23/11 09/24-10/15/11 10/07-17/11

Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run (Analytical Fraction B) Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run (Analytical Fraction 2B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run (Analytical Fraction 3A) Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run (Analytical Fraction 3B) Whitaere-Greer Back Half- Run (Analytical Fraction 3C)

Lab Code K1109036-001,-004
Kl109036-007 Kli09036-010
K1109036-013
Kl109036-016 MRL0.05
0.2
0.02
0.I
0.1

ResultND
9.8
0.04
1.9
17.2

Total Back Half- Run Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 0.420.47

28.928.9

K11090361CP,jel Hg Run 1/03/IClient:Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analytical Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc. Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

09/21/11 Date Received:

09/23/11 Date Extracted:

09/24-10/15/ Date Analyzed:

10/07-I 7/11 Total Mercury EPA Method 29/7470A Units: Micrograms

(•tg) (Field Blank Corrected) Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 2B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 3A) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 3B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical Fraction 3C)

Lab Code K1109036-002,-005
K1109036-008
Kl109036-011
KLI09036-014
Kl109036-017 MRL0,05
0.2
0.02
0.1
0.1

Result0.10
8.8
0.30

ND
3.9

Total Back Half- Run 2 Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 2 0.420.47

.13.013.1

K11090361CP.jel Hg Run 11103111Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analytical Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc. Service Request: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Total Mercury EPA Method 29/7470A Units: Micrograms

(•g) (Field Blank Corrected) K1109036 09/21/11 09/23/11 09/24-10/15/11 10/07-17/11

Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 3 (Analytical Fraction B) Whitacre-Greer Front Half- Run 3 (Analytical Fraction 2B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 (Analytical Fraction 3A) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 (Analytical Fraction 3B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 3 (Analytical Fraction 3C)

Lab Code K1109036-003,-006
K1109036-009
K1109036-012
Kl109036-015
Kl109036-018 MRL0.05
0.2
0.02
0.1
0.1

Result0.13
19.0
0.26
0.3
21.6

Total Back Half- Run 3 Total Back Half+ Front Half- Run 3 0.420.47

41.241.3

K11090361CP.jcl I-Ig Run 11103111 Page No.:Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analytical Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc. Service Request:

Kl109036 Date Collected:

09/21/11 Date Received:

09/23/11 Date Extracted:

09/24-10/15/1 Date Analyzed:

10/07-17/11 Total Mercury EPA Method 29/7470A Units: Micrograms

(/.tg) Sample Name Whitacre-Greer Front Half Blank (Analytical Fraction B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank (Analytical Fraction 2B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank (Analytical Fraction 3A) Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank (Analytical Fraction 3B) Whitacre-Greer Back Half Blank (Analytical Fraction 3C)

Lab Code K1109036-019,-024 K1109036-019,-02!
K1109036-019 K1109036-020,-022
K1109036-023 MRL0.05
0.2
0.02
0.1
0.1

ResultND

ND

ND

ND
0.1

K11090361CP,jel H• Field Blks 11/03/I Pnge N<•.: 14Client: Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. Analytical Report Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc.

Total Mercury EPA Method 29/7470A Units: Micrograms

(p.g)

Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

NA Date Received:

NA Date Extracted:

09/24-10/15/11 Date Analyzed:

10/07-17/11

Sample Name Front Half- Method Blank (Analytical Fraction B) Back Half- Method Blank (Analytical Fraction 2B) Back Half- Method Blank (Analytical Fraction 3A) Back Half- Method Blank (Analytical Fraction 3B) Back Half- Method Blank (Analytical Fraction 3C)

Lab Code KI 109036-MBF
K1109036-MBB1 K1109036-MBB2
K1109036-MBB3
K1109036-MBB4 MRL0.05
0.2
0.02
0.1
0.I

ResultND
ND

ND

ND

ND

g11090361CP,jcl Ilg Metl•od Blks 1/03/IClient: Project: Sample

Matrix:

Sample Name: Lab Code: Analyte Mercury COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC.

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc.

QA/QC Report

Duplicate Summary Total Metals Units: Micrograms

(•tg) (Field Blank Corrected) Whitacre-Greer Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical

Fraction 2B) KI 109036-008D

EPA Sample Method MRL

Result 29/7470A 0.2

8.8 Duplicate Sample Result9.4 Service Request: Date Collected: Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed:

Average 9.1

K 1109036 09/21/11 09/23/11 10/14/11 10/15/11

Relative Percent Difference

K11090361CP•i¢1 DIJP 1/03/I PageClient:Project: Sample

Matrix: COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC.

Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Misc.

QA/QC Repo•

Matrix Spike Summary Total Metals Units: Micrograms

(•tg) (Field Blank Corrected)

Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

09/21/11 Date Received:

09/23/11 Date Extracted:

10/14/11 Date Analyzed:

10/15/II

Sample Name: Lab Code:. Analyte Mercury

Whitacre-Greer

Back Half- Run 2 (Analytical

Fraction 2B) KI 109036-008MS

MRL0.2

Spike

Sample Level Result

Spiked Sample Result CAS Percent Recovery Percent Acceptance Recovery Limits 0.9 8.8

9.2

NA

70-130

K 1090361CP•ic Spike 1103111 Page No.: 17Client: Project: LCS

Matrix:

Source: Analyte Mercury COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC. QA/QC Report Custom Stack Analysis,

LLC. Whitaere-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

NA Date Received:

NA Date Analyzed:

10/15/11 Laboratory Control Sample Summary

(Front Half) Total Metals Units: •tg/L (ppb) CAS Spike Solution

EPA Method 29/7470A True Valuel0

Result11.1

Percent Recovery 111

CAS Percent Recovery Acceptance Limits 85-115

K Iflt10361CP,j¢l I.CSW-Fron! 11/03/I Page No.:Client:Project: LCS

Matrix:

Soul'ce: Analyte Mercury COLUMBIA

ANALYTICAL

SERVICES,

INC.

Custom Stack Analysis,

LLC. Whitacre-Greer Fireproofing

Company Water

CAS Spike Solution QA/QC Report

Service Request:

K1109036 Date Collected:

NA Date Received:

NA Date Analyzed:

10/15/I1 Laboratory Con.trol Sample Summary

(Back Half) Total Metals Units: •tg/L (ppb)

EPA Method 29/7470A True Value5.0

Result5.27

Percent Recovery 105

CAS Percent Recovery Acceptance Limits 85-115

K110g0361CI•.jcl. I,CSW-Back 11/03/11 19Calibration DataC.S.A. co. STACK SAMPLER CALIBRATION

SHEET Customer

Order No. Date 07/30/11

Serial No.

003

CSA Unit No.

003 Pump OK

Pump Oil CHNG

Clean Quick Disconnects

YES Maometers OK

DryTest Meter OK

Thermometers

SEE CALSHT Lights OK

Electrical Check OK Varlac

OK Vacuum Guage

OK Leak Check @ 27" Hg Vacuum NO LEAKS Remarks 8.1" NO LEAKS Barometer (Pb) 29.55
K N DH CFw

CFd

Tw

Itd Otd

TD

t H Y 0.0158 0.0368

0.5

5 5.00

72 72 72

72 12.98

1.917 0.999 0.0317 0.0737

1,O

5 4.96

72 72 72 72 9.26 1.957 1.005 0.0634 0,1470

2.0

10 9.96

72 72 72 72 13.00

1.929 0.999 0.1268 0.2490

4.0

10 10.00

72 72 72

72 9.23 1.945 0.991 0.1902 0.4310

6.0

10 9.87

72 72 72

72 7.58 1.967 0,998 0.2536 0.5880

8.0

10 9.80

72 72 72 72 6.50 1.929 1.000 Tolerances H 1.6 1.8___•4-2.1

Y 0.99 1.0___QO 1.01
H K/Pb (Otd + 460))) ((( Tw + 460) t / CFw )=
Y (CFw Pb Td avg. + 460 )) / CFd (Pb + N Tw + 460))
DH Orifice pressure drop in. H20 £Fw= Volume wet test meter F • CFd= Volume dry test meter F • Tw= Temp. wettest meter Itd= Inlet temperature

dry test meter Otd= Outlet temperature

dry test meter Td avg, Averagetemperature

dry test meter t= Time minutes Pb= Barometer press. DIALTHERMOMETER CALIBRATION Precision Lab Thermometer Meter Thermometers Impinger Outlet Thermometer ICE WATER 0 ITd 0 OTd 0 (1) 0 (2) 0 STACK DIGITAL TEMPERATURE

INDICATORS NBS TRACABLE FROM FACTORY. 2 UNITS CALIBRATEDAGAINST

EACH OTHERPyroMation
ALL THERMOCOUPLES

ARE CALIBRATED

BY OVEN FROM 100 TO 500F AGAINST A CMS LAB THERMOMETER

(No. 227-934). ANY THERMOCOUPLE

THAT IS MORE THAN +_2% FROM STANDARD IS DISCARDED. Delta H 1.941 Y: 0.999

BOILING WATER 0 ITd 0 OTd 0 00C.S,A, Co. STACK SAMPLER CALIBRATION

SHEET Customer Date 07/22/11

Serial No.

MB 18

CSA Unit No. Pump OK

Pump Oil CHNG

Clean Quick Disconnects Maometers OK

DryTest Meter OK

Thermometers Lights OK

Electrical Check OK

Variac Vacuum Guage

OK Leak Check @ 27" Hg Vacuum NO LEAKS Remarks 8.9" NO LEAKS Order No, 018 YESSEE CALSHT OK

Barometer (Pb) 28.55
K N DH CFw CFd Tw Itd Otd TD

H Y 0.0158 0.0368

0,5

5 5,00 81 82 81 81.5 12.90 1,985 1.000 0,0317 0,0737

1.0 5 4.98 81 82 81 81,5 9,17 2,012 1.002 0,0634 0,1470

2,0 10 9,82 81 82 82 82 12,93 1,996 1.015 0,1268 0,2490

4,0 10 9,95 81 82 82 82 9,14 1,995 0.998 0.1902 0.4310

6.0 10 9.94 82 82 82 82 7•2 1.980 0.991 0.2536 0.5880

8.0 10 9.86 82 82 82 82 6.55 2.057 0,994 Tolerances H 1.6 1.84 -2.1 Y 0.99 1.0__.Q- 1.01
H K / Pb (Otd + 460))) (({ Tw + 460) t / CFw )2
Y (CFw Pb Td avg, + 460 )) / CFd (Pb + N Tw + 460))
DH Orifice pressure drop in, H20 CFw-- Volume wet test meter F a CFd= Volume dry test meter F Tw= Temp, wet test meter Itd= Inlet temperature

dry test meter Otd= Outlet temperature

dry test meter Td avg. Averagetemp.erature

dry test meter t= Time minutes Pb= Barometer press. DIAL THERMOMETER

CALIBRATION Precision Lab Thermometer Meter Thermometers Impinger Outlet Thermometer ICE WATER 0 ITd 0 OTd 0 (1) 0 (2) o STACK DIGITAL TEMPERATURE

INDICATORS NSSTRACABLE FROM FACTORY. 2 UNITS CALIBRATEDAGAI

,NST EACH OTHERPyroMation
ALL THERMOCOUPLES

ARE CALIBRATED

BY OVEN FROM 10OTO 500F AGAINST A CMS LAB THERMOMETER

(No. 227-934). ANY THERMOCOUPLE

THAT IS MORE THAN +2% FROM STANDARD IS DISCARDED. Delta H 2.004 Y: 1.000

BOIUNG WATER 0 ITd 0 OTd 0 0ONozzle Calibration

Data

Location: Method: Date:Source: Analyst:

Run #1

Run #2 Tic" :•/• Run #3 Mean

Mean.7/? Mean ,7/.s 7/¢

]Method: Nozzle

Calibration

Data Date:, Source: Analyst:

Run #1

Run #2

•/ y

I, t/;. Mean

Mean:•/5 Mean:•/Ydo•_J

LU

W

o

_z

•A©.._1

13_WILlZ0l--

Z

C•

o
•)LIJ

W
0LL...I

Wd

8Calibration complies

with leO 9001 ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1

Cert. No.: 1870-3593474 Calibration C.•rtilicale No. 1750.01, Traceable@

Certificate

of CaBbration

for Digital Barometer

Module

Instrument Identification: Custom St•ck Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, At'm: Joe Crowe, Alliance, OH 44601 U.S.A. RMA:959814 Model: 1870

S/N: 90724105

Manufacturer

Control Company Standards/Equipment:Description Serial Number

Due Date Digital Barometer D4540001

8/19/11 Chilled Mirror Hygrometer 3187.4/H2048MCR

7126111 Digital Thermometer 90758953

9115/11

NIST Traceable

Reference 1000283861 8493 4000,3167760 ••rtificate Information: Technician: 57

Procedure:

CAL-31 Test Conditions:

25.0°C

43.0 %RH 1009 mBar

Col Date: 4/15/11

Cal Due: 10/15/11
Calibration Unit(s) mb/hPa mblhPa mb/hPa %RH Data:NominaI..___L

As. Foun.•d ]. In__•ToI.•! 1 81o

• 41 Y Nominal' 1,006.27 25.273 ---45.710

AsL 810

Y 912 Y 1,007 Y 25 Y 43 Y Min

Max 795 816 898 919 996 1,017 24 26 36 56 +U TUR
1.20 >4:1 1.20 >4:1 0.580 1.7:1 1.300 >4:1
This Instrument was calibrated usirig Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology.
A Teal Uncertainty Ratio Of at least 4:1 is maintained unless OtFk•rwia• stated anclte calculated u•ng tim expanded measurement uncertainty. UnceriainlY evgl,3ati•n InclUdeS It'm instrument teal and is calculated in accordance with the ISO "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty Measurement" (GUM), "The uncerlainty represents expended 14ncertainty using covecage taclo¢k 2 approximale 95% confidence level. In tolerance conditions based test rssUlts'falllng v•thin specified limitl with reduction by the uncertaintY of the measurement. The rssulls conlalned herein relate only I0 the item calibrated. This ce•lJficate shatl not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Control C•mpany. Neminal=Standa•d's Reading; As Left=Instrument's

Reading; In Tot=In Tolerance: MinJMax=Acoeptance

Range; ±u=Expanded Measurement Uncertainly: TUR=TSSt Uncedainly Ratio: Acouracy=±(Max-Min)/2; Min Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Date=MM/DD/YY

Nicel Rodrtguez, Quality Manager Wallace Boi'w, Technical IVlanagef Maintaining Accuracy:
In opinion once calibrated your Digital Barometer Module should maintain its accuracy, There is exact way Io determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Be/omelet Modules change little, any at all. blJt be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. Recalibration: For factory calibl'alior, and re-certification traceable to National Institute of Slandards and Technology co.tact Conb'ol Company.

CONTROLCOMPANY 4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714

Fax 281 482-9448

servlce@control3.com

w•v.control3.com
Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratoey Accredited by (A2LA) American Association for Laboratory Acoredltadon. Certl/icate No. 1750.01. Conlrol Company is ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified by (DNV) Det Norska V•itas, Certificate No. CERT-01805-2006..AQ-HOU-ANAB. Internat{o•al Laborato• Acoradttation Coopetallon (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA).Calibration complies

with ISO 9001 ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1 ",,,,,,,,,'" c•,,r•on Cert. No.: 3415-3076895 Ce.rfific•ls No. 1750.01Traceable®

Certificate

of Calibration

for Digital Calipers

Instrument Identification: Model: 3415

S/N: 101856179

Manufacturer"

Control Company Standards/Equipment:Description Serial'Number

Due Date

NIST Traceable

Reference Gage Block Set 99146223

9t22/10

1000267588 Certificate Information: Technician: 57

Procedure:

CAL-05 Cal Date: 8/03/10

Cal Due: 8103112 Test Conditions:

24.5°C

42.0 %RH 1019 mBar cafibrati•n-D•ta: (New Instrument)- Unit(s) Nominal

As Found In Tol in N.A. in

in 6e•th

N.A. in inside

•_. N.A.

Nominal 0.0000

As Left0.0000 0.1000 0.1000 2.0000 2.0005 4.0000 4.0000 6.0000 6.0005 2.0000 1.9995 1.0000 1.0000 In Tol Min-0.0010

±u TUR Max0.0010 0.0003

3.3:1 0.1010 0.0003

3.3:1
0,0004 0.0990 1.9980 2.0020 0.0003

>4:1 3.9960 4.0040 0.0004

>4:1 5.9940 6.0060

>4:1 2.0020 0.0003

>4:1 1.0010 0.0003

3.2:1 1.9980 0.9990 This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology.
A Test Urcedainty Ralio of at least 4:1 •s maintained unless otherwise stated and is calculated using the expandod measurement uncertainty, Uncodainty evaluation includes the instr•nent under and is calcuisled In z•.ordance with the ISO "Guide to the Expression of Uncerta•nt• in Measurement" (GUMJ. The unce•ainty represents expanded uncertainty using coverage fastot ks2 to approximate 95% confidence level. In tolerance conditinnt based test results fallin= wlt•n specified limits with rm:|ucllon by the uncertainty of the mossuram0nt. The results contained herein relate only to the item calibrated. Thee certificate shell not be regroduced excopt in fur, without written approval of Control Comp•'•y. Nomtnal=Standerd's Reading; As Left=Instrument's

Reading; In Tol=th Tolerance; MinfMax=AccePtance

Range; ±U=Expanded Measurement Uncedeinty; TUR=Ta•t Uncertainty Ratio; Accuracy=+{Msxq¢liny'2; Min Nominal{Rounded}

Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rocmded)

Tolerance; DaT•=MM/OD/YY

Nicol Rodr•guez, Quality Manager Wallace Bern/, Ted'micel Manager Maintaining ",•.••i
th apron calioreled your Digital Calipers should maintain its accuracy. There is axec.t way 1o determine how tong calibration will be maintained. Digital Cel•perss change little, any al all, but be affected by aging, lemperature. =hock. and contamination. Recalibration: For factory calibrslion and re-.certifcabon traceable to National Inslilu•te of Stsr',dards and Technology contact Control Compaoy.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714

Fax 281 482-9448

servlce•control3.com

www.control3.com
Co¢ltrol Company is leO 17025'.2005 C=dibration Laboratory Accredited by (/k?.LA} Amedcen Association lot Laboratory Accreditation, Certi•cate No. 1750.01, Control Company Is ISO 9001:2008 Quality' Cettilrisd by {DNV) Det Notre Ve¢ilas, Cedtr•,•ats No. CERT-01 B05.2006-AO-HOU-ANAB. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC} Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). Page of

Trace•bl¢• ii registered ttldtm•rk orconttol Company

(• 2009 Contro• Company•

••_ Calibration

complies

with iSO 9001 •• •

ISO/IEC

17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1 ',•,,,,•,'" C•,brat•on Cert. No.: 3415-3757006 Ce.rlillcnle No. 1750.01Traceable®

Certificate

of Calibration

for Digital Calipers Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International,

Inc., 1310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. Instrument Identification: Custom St•ck Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, At'm: Walt Mumme•, Nliance, OH •601U-S'•"

RMA:962285 Model: 62379-531

S/N: 51055322

Manufacturer:

Control Company Standards/Equipment:Description Serial Nurnbe.r

Due Date Gage Block Set 99146223

10/01/11

NIST Traceable

Reference 1000286154 Certificate Information: Technician: 57

Procedure:

CAL-05 Test Conditions:

24.0°C

41.0 %RH 1014 mBar Calibration Data: Unit(s) Nominal

'As Found In Tel Nominal in --61•6

6T••-6--]

• o.oooo in •',:1"•-•

"0-•" '|"-:-• •

0.1000 in •.-.•0•

1,999•-5

"• 2.0000

•n 4.0000

3.9990

Y 4.0000 in 6.0000

5.9980

Y 6.0000 in depth

2.0000

1.9990 •_•.•!

2.0000 in inside

1.0000

0.9990

1.0000'

Cal Date: 7/07/11

Cal Due: 7/07112

As Left 0.0000 0.0995 1.9990 Y 3.9990 Y 5.9980 Y 1.9990 Y-- 0,9990 YIn Tel Min Y -0.0010 Y 0.0990

Max0.0010 0.1010 1.9980 2.0020 3.9960 4.0040 5.9940 6.0060 1.9980 2.0020 0.9990 1,0010

+U TUR 0 0003 3.3:1 !0.0003 3'.3:1 0.0003 •4:1 0.0004 :•4:1 0,0004 •4:1 0,0003' •4:1 0,0003 3.1:1
This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards

and Technology.
A Teat Uncertainly Ratio of at leaal 4:1 is maintained unless otherwise stated and is calculated using Ihe expanded measurement unce•lainty. Uncertainty eveluetio• inc•ude• the instrument urger lest and calculated in accordance wi• the ISO "Guide to the E•.oras=ion of Uncertainty in Measurament" (GUM}. The uncertainty represents expr•nded uncertainty using co'•rage factor k=2 to approximate 95% confidence level. In toleranCe conditions based test results falling within specified limits with reduction by/he uncertainty of •he messyernest. The result• contained herein relate onJy to the item calibrated. This certihcata shall nct be reproduced except in full, w•thout v•ltlen approval of Control Company. Nominal=Standard's Reading; As Left=Instrument's

Reading; In Tel=in Tolerance; Min/Max=Accep•ance

Range; ±U=Expandod Measurement Uncertainty;, TUR=Test Unc•lainty Ratio; Accuracy=¢|Max-Min)r2; Min Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance: Max Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Data=MM/DDfYY

N/col Rodriguez, Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical M•nager Maintaining Accuracy:
In opinion once calibrated y•ur D•gital Calipers should maintain its accuracy. There is exact way Io determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Caliperss change little, if any at all, • be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. Recalibration: For factory calibration and re-ce•tificalion traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology contact Control Company.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Frlendswood.

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714

Fax 281 482-9448

service@control3.com

www.control3.com
Conlrol Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration L•boratory Accrodil•:l by (A2LA) Amorlcan Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Certificate No, 1750,01. Control Company is ISO 9001 ;2008 Quality Certified by (.DNV) Dot Norske Veritas, Certificate No. CERT-O1805-2006-AQ-HOU-ANAB. International Laboratory Accreditation Cool, oration (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). P=B¢ or"

T•=ccablL'• is reglstcrcd tradczn•J,: el'Central Comp=my

ID 2009 Coat,el Comp=syCalibration complies

with ISO 900t ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1 Ca•ibra•on

Cert, No.: 3461-3773982 Certilicale No. 1750,01 Traceable®.Certificate

of Calibration

for ManometedPressure/Vacuum Gauge Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International,

Inc., 1310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. Instrument Identification: Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, 14614 Canfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mummert, Alliance, OH 44601 U.S.A. RMA:962285 Model: 33500-084

S/N: 72018122

Manufacturer:

Control Company Standards/Equipment:Description, Pressure Calibrator Serial Number

Due Date

NIST Traceable

Reference 8 e00010402

7113112

1000301003 Certificate Information: Technician: 61

Procedure:

CAL-346X Test Conditions:

23.0°C

46.0 %RH 1011 mBar

Cal Date: 7/15/11

Cal Due: 7/15/12 Calibration Data:

This Instrument was calibrated uslng Instrumen•

Traceable to •a•onal Instltute of S•ndards

and Technology.

Ni•l R•riguoZ, Quality M•ger Walla• Be•, T•ni=l M•ager Maintaining Accuracy: In opinion calibrated your Manomeler/Pt'essureNacuum

Gauge shou•l maintain ies accuracy. Tt•aro is exac• way to determine how long calibration wilt be maintained. ManomaterfPrassureNacuum Gauges •hanga little, tf any at all. but be affected by aging, temperature, shock, and contamination. Recalibration: For factory c.at•ralion end re-certification traceable to National Institute of Standards and Technology cantact Control Company.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482o1714

Fax 281 482.9448

service@control3.com

wv/w.control3.com Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratory Ac•'ediled by (A2LA) Amedcan Association for Laboratory Aco'editalion, Certificate No. 17•0.01. Control Company is ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified by (DIN) Det No•ke Varitas, Certificate No. CERT-0160•2006-AQ-HOU-ANA•. Internalional Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA), Page of

Traccabl'•0 is registered Imdemtrk el'Control Company

© 2009 Control CompanyCalibration complies

with ISO 9001 ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1 "',t,.I.•," Calibr,•tion Cert. No.: 1870-3759307 Certificale Na. 1750.01 Traceable@

Certificate

of Calibration

for Digital Barometer

Module
Instrument Identification: Custorn Stack Analysts, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mummed, Alliance, OH 44601U-S-•..

RMA:962285 Model: 1870

S/N: 90724105

Manufacturer:

Control Company Description Serial Number

Due Date Digital Barometer, D4540001

8/19]11 Chilled Mirror Hygro .meter

31874/H2048MCR

5/12/12 Digital Thermometer 90758953

9t15/11

NIST Traceable

Reference 100o283861 9193 4000-3167760 Certificate Information: Technician: 57

Procedure:

CAL-31 Test Conditions:

24.0°C

43.0 %RH 1011 mBar

Cal Date: 7/08/11

Cal Due: 7108/12 Calibration Data:
mb/hPa 909.20 mb]hP• 1,010.30 ;C 23.969 %RH • 43,980

As Found -i In Tel 9121,012 Y
41 Nominal

As Left 805.10 809 910.30 913 1,010.52 1,012 25.565 25 40.97• 39

Min

Max L ±U 795 • 900 921 • 1.20 1,000 1,021 • 25 2•7 0.580

TUR>4:1>4:1>•,:1

This Instrument was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards

and Technology. A Test Uncertainty Ratio o! at teest 4:1 is maintained untet• otherwise stated and is calcu•terJ us(rig th• expanded measLcement uncertainty. Uncertainty •valuation includes the insthJme•t under test and is calculated in acc•dance with Ihe I$O "Guide the Expression of Uncertainly in Meesurernont" {GUM), Ttto uncertainty represents expanded uncertain•y using ¢ovetage•actot k=2 approximate 95% conrCdance level. In tolerance conditions based test results fallir•g within specified limits with reduction by the uncertainty/of the measurement. •be result• contained herein relate only to •e item calibrated, This certificate shall not be rap•educa¢l except in full, wi|hoat written approval of Control Company. Nominat=Standa•'d's Reading; As Left=Instrument's

Reading, In Tel=In Tolerance; Min/Max=Acceptance

Range; :•.l=Expanded Measurement Uncertainly; TUR=Test Uncertainty Ratio;. Acc•racy=:l:(Max-Min)t2; Min Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Max Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Dete=MM/DD/W

Nicol Rodr/guez, Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical Manager Maintaining Accuracy:
In opinion calibrated you.r Digita] Beromot#t Module should maintain its accuracy. There is exact way to determine how long calibration will be maintained. Digital Barometer Modules change little, if any at all, but can'bo affected by aging, tempensture, shack, and corltarn[na•Jon Recalibration: For •actory calibration and re-cerllf•caflon traceable to National Instilute o• Standards and Technology contact Control Company.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX77546

USA Phone 281 482o1714

Fax 281 482-9448

service@control3.com

www, control3.com Control Company is ISO 17025:2005 Calibration Laboratory Acc/edlt•d by (A2.LA) American Association fat Laboratory Ac•editotion, Certificate No, 1750.01. Control Company is ISO 900• :2008 Quality CertirP•d by {DNV) DeS Norska Vedtas, Certificate No. CERT.01805-2006-AQ.HOU-ANAB. International Laboratory Aco,'editetion Cooperation (ILAC)- Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). P.F.¢ at"

Tr•ceabl• is r¢sistercd tr•¢n•rk o•'C0.1•ol Comp=•

• 200• Co.lrol CompanyCalibration complies

with ISO 9001 ISO/IEC 17025 AND ANSI/NCSL

Z540-1 "/"/.h, •''•" Calibration Cert. No.: 1870-3759301 Ceriilicale No. 1750.01 Traceable®

Certificate

of Calibration

for Digital Barometer

Module Manufactured for and distributed by: VWR International,

Inc., I310 Goshen Parkway, West Chester, P.A. 19380 U.S.A. Instrument Identification: Custom Stack Analysis, LLC, 14614 Cenfield St NE, Attn: Walt Mumme• Alliance, OH 44601U-S-A"

RMA:962285 Model: 23609-208

S/N: 61542879

Manufacturer:

Control Company Standards/Equipment:Description Serial Number

Due Date Digital Barometer D4540001

8/19/11 Chilled Mirror Hygrometer 31874/H2048MCR

5/12112 Digital Thermometer 90758953

9/15/11

NIST Traceable

Reference 1000283861 9193 4000-3167760 Certificate Information: Technician: 57

Procedure:

CAL-31 Test Conditions:

24.0°C

43.0 %RH 1011 mBar,

Cal Date: 7/08/11

Cal Due: 7/08/12 Calibration Data: Unit(s) Nominal mb/hPa 804,90 mb/hPa 909.20 mb/hPa 1,010.30 °C 23.969 %RH 43.980

802

805.10

As Left In Tel Min 802 Y

795 §08' Y

900 1,0'09 Y

ii00b', 25 Y

25 37 Y

31

816 1.20 >4:1 921 1.20 >•4:1 1,021 1.20 >4:1 27 0.580

1;7:1 51 1.300

>;4:1 Thls Instrument was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to'National

Institute of Standards

and Technology. A Test Unceelairlly Ratio of at least 4:1 is maintained unless other•vise stated and is oalculaled using the expa.,'•dec• measurement uncertainty. Uncertainty evaluation indude• the insl•ument under teal and is calculated in acc•dance with the ISO "Guide the Expression of Unoartainty in Measurement" [GUM). The uncerlainty represents expended unced•inty using caverage #actor k=2 approximate 95% ccefiden, level. In tolerance condilions based test results felling within specified limllswilh reduction by the uncertainty of the measurement. The resull•i contained •erein relate only te Ihe item celtbraled. This cortificet• shall hal be relzoduced except in full. wilhout wdlten approval of Control Company. Nomlnal=Slandard's Reading; As Lefl.=lnstrumenl's

Reading; In Tel=In Tolerance: MirYM•x=AcCeplanCe

Range; +U=Expended Measurement Uncertainty; TUR=Test Unce•ainly Ratio; Accuracy=±(Max-MinV2; Mln Nominal(Rounded)

Tolerance; Max Nominal{Rounded)

Tolerance; Dale=MM/DDPfY

Niool Rodr/ouez. Quality Manager Wallace Berry, Technical Manager Maintaining Accuracy:
In opinion calibralad your Digital Barometer Module should maintain its accuraw• There is exact way to determine how long callbralion will be maintained. Digital Barometer Modules change tittle, any el all, but be affected by eg=ng, temperature, shock, and contamlnalion. Recalibration: For factory calibration and re-certificatlon traceable to National Institute of Standards and TecJrmology contact Conlrol Company.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,'lX

77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714

Fax 281 482-9448

service@control3.com

www.control3.com Control Corn•any Is ISO 17025:2005 Calibrat/on Laborato•//•¢•zedited

by (A2LA) Amartcer• Association for Laboratory Accreditation, Ce•ficate No. 1750.01 Conlrol Company is leo 9001:2008 Quality Certlr=ed by (DNV) Del N0rske Veritas, Certificate No. CERT-01805-2006-AQ-HOU-ANAB, International LaboraloG Acc•edilalinn Ccepe•allon {ILAC) Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MRA). Page or

Traceablc•gs is rcg;•ltred trademark of Centre| Colaplny

O 2rl0O Con{•'•l Compan.vTHERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS

FOR SOURCE SAMPLING

APPARATUS

FACILITY UNIT NO SERIAL NO. Pb CALIBRATED IN ICE WATERiAND

BOILING WATER USING A CMS PRECISION GLASS THERMOMETER

NO. 229-054, ASTM NO. •3F FOR ICE WATER AND CMS NO. 229-088, ASTM NO. 66F FOR' BOILING WATER.
TC • TC

• TC CONDENSOR THERMOCOUPLES r,:..t

32

•,2.•- 32

,2-,///

32

'ROBE THERMO_COUPLES 32 • 212 32 -• 212 32 • 212 32 212 3p.2 32 212 32 212 32 212
•p.• 32
•t•:• 323232 212212212212 6_P_d 32

• 32

• 32
6P-4 32 212212212212

•,. 32 212 32 212

TMERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURES

ARE READ ON THE DTI USED DURING TEST. DTI CALIBRATED

BY ALTEK 22 TC SOURCE S# 243783 PRIOR TO TC CAL.THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS

FOR SOURCE SAMPLING

APPARATUS

UNIT NO, SERIAL NO. Pb CALg'IRATED IN ICE WATER AND BOILING WATER US/,NG A CM$ PRECISION GLASS "/HERMOME'[ER

NO. 229-054, AS'I'M NO. 63F FOR ICE WATER AND CM$ NO 229•1•8. AS'I•,I NO C•F FOR BOILING WATER.

32 212
o• 32

'• •

212

•/7.2-.

o.:-• 32 2._ 7,)"-"

O• 32 212212

3232 /2-- 212212212212 32 212
3S .2

32 212 32 212 3232 -IS-2 3232 4,.s.:l. 32

3232 2122Y2'21-2•'I2"212Zl.Z
212212212 •s._3 32 212 •-IER/dOCOUPLF. TEMPERA'RJRES

ARE READ ON THE D'I'I USED DURING OTi CAI.I•it:IATEO

•9•" AI.TI•.K 22 rC gOURCG .• 2437113 PRIOR TO TC'CALTHERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIONS

FOR SOURCE SAMPLING

APPARATUS

UNIT NO SERIAL NO. Pb CALIBRATED IN ICE WATER AND BOILING WATER USING A CMS PRECISION GI•ASS THERMOMETER

NO. 229-054, ASTM NO, 63F FOR ICE WATER AND CMS NO. 229-088, ASTM NO, 66F FOR BOILING WATER

|•;•,_VY_•_.,P=• BOILING WATER TC P_B.EGJ•O.U TC

• TC STACK THERMOCOUPLE

=ROBE THERMOCOUPLES IdLe_:! 32

73 212

_2/,•
•2e-Z 32 212 •Ze.9. 32 212 .M_E_T_ER rHERMOCOUPLES

UNIT ool • 32 212 M-.Z 32 212 •,•..•R THERMQCQI•PIwES.-

UNIT O0• M-•

32

7.•.-. •

212

2 /£2--

• 32

• 3:2-

I•

212 •I•]'ER THE RMOC•O_U•PL

• M-•

32

"-•,,2-, 212

ME•ER THE•.M._O_C_OU.PLE$

UNIT 004

.METER TJ-JF•'•MOCQUPLES

UNIT 17
•

3•

,• •

•,

212212 .METER THERMOCOUPLES

U, NIT 18

THERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURES

ARE READ ON THE DTI USED DURING TEST• CALIBRATED BY ALTEK 22 TC SOURCE S# 243783 PRIOR TO TC CAL.Client: Pitot Tube Inspection

Date:

Level and Perpendicular Obstruction? Damaged? a; (-lO < a,< +1o.) b, (-5 <b:< +5 •) A (Pa {- Pb) Zs= A tan Y (< 0.125") Ws= A tan 0 (< 0.03"125") Dt (0.1875" < Dt < 0.375") P. (1.05 D• < P.• < 1.5 D,) P•.. (1.05 D• P, < 1.5 DI) • •- Pb • "0-•0"6-3 •'

Probe Minimum

l.nterf'ercnces

x (> .75") | X/D,, (>= 1.5") Zp (>= .75")

[

D•Zswsala2blb2XZpY

P,• • Pb Distance between where pilots adjoin to lip of pilol (Must be between 1.05 & 1,50 times O.D. of tubing) Distance between wl]ere pilols adjoin to li•) of pilot (Musl be between 1.05 & 1.50, times O.D, of tubing) Diamete• of pilot tube (0.375 inches on all pilols) Distance between the tip of the impact an'd static line along (he length of the pilot (Must be <1/8 inch(0.1250)) Spacing between Pilot lubes where welded together (Must be <1/32 inch (0.0313)) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side [o side or perpendicular

to length of probe (Must be <10 Deg) Angle across opening of Pitot tube from side to side or perpendicular

to lenglh of probe (Must be <10 Deg) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular

to length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular

to length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) Distance between side of nozzle and side of pilot tube (Must be >3t4 inch) Distance from center of pilot opening back to lip of thermal couple (Must be >--3/4 inch (0.75)) Distance from center of pilot opening back to probe (Must be >=3 inches)

W

;:,':O:,XO D) &,< I.(-.'. O L)

zPNozzle Calibration

Data Facility: Location: Method: •

•'/• Date:Analyst:

Run #1 ,,•/#s Run #2

Run #3 •I_• 's_z• Mean

Mean

MeanClient: Pitot Tube Inspection

Date: Probe/Pilot Number Level and Perpendicular Obstruction? Damaged? al (-10 < a•< +10o) a:, (-10 < a•< +10 °) b, (-5 < b•< +5 A (Pa + Pb) Zs= A tan Y (< 0.125") Ws= A tan 0 (< 0.03125") D, (0.1875" < D• < 0.375") P. (1.05 D, < P. < 1.5 D•) Pb (1.05 D• < P, < 1.5 D•) Pa Pb ,•_; 0.063" b• (-5" < b•< +5 °)

0
Probe ('vlii•imum

Intcrf'¢renccs
Y (>= 3.0") X (> .75") X tD. (>= 1.5") "Zp (>= .75")PaPbDIZsWsala2b•b2XZpY Distance between where pilols adjoin to tip of pilot (Must be between 1.05 & 1,50 times O.D. of tubing) Distanue between where pilots adjoin to lip of pilot (Must be between 1.05 & 1.50 times O.D. of tubing) Diameter of pilot tube (0.375 inches on all pilots) Dislance between the tip of the impact and static line along the length of the pltot (Must be <1/8 inch(0.1250)) Spacing between Pilot tubes where welded together (Must be <1/32 inch (0.0313)) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular"

to tenglh of probe (Must be <10 Deg) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular

to length of probe (Must be <10 Deg) Angle across opening of Pitot tube from side to side or perpendloular

te length of probe (Must be <5 Deg) Angle across opening of Pilot tube from side to side or perpendicular

to }ength of probe (Must be <5 Deg) Distance between side of nozzle and side of pilot tube (Must be >3/4 Inch) Distance from center of pilot opening back to tip of thermal couple (Must be >=3/4,inch

(0.75)) Distance from center of pilot opening bac}¢ to probe (Must be >=3 Inches)

el & a2

w

ma 6 Pb {:' O5 O D) & (':Production Data