alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July

6 , 2015

Mr. Zane Hollingshead Ms. Jimette Keenan Western Slope Aerial, L LC 21451 Government Springs Road Montrose, CO 81403 Dear Mr. Hollingshead and Ms. Keenan: This letter is to inform y ou that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). I t explains why we can not process y our request and what y ou should do in the next 30 day s. **Why We Can No**  **t Process Your Request** We entered y our March 20 , exemption request into the public doc ket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0907 ), but we are unable to process y our request any further. The information y ou sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, y ou must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why

granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why

the exemption would no t adversely affect safety

or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which y ou seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. **What You Should Do** If y ou want us to process y our request any further, y ou must send the information descri bed earlier to reach us within 30 day s. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires y ou to send y our petition for exemption at least 120 day s before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

**If We Do No**  **t Hear From You** If we do not hear from y ou within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying y ou further. If y ou have any

questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677. Sincerely , /s/ Brenda Robeson Program Analy st , Airmen and Airspace Rules Division Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5146 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5146

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(4-), [7-amino-3-[(3-chloro-
 2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxy -2-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)][6-
      amino-4-hydroxy-3-[(2-hydroxy 5 -nitro-3-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-
          naphthalenesulfonato(4-)]-, tetrasodium (P 96-1335).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Kissell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(4-), [7-amino-3-[(3-chloro-
 2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-4-hydroxy -2-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)][6-
      amino-4-hydroxy-3-[(2-hydroxy 5 -nitro-3-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-
          naphthalenesulfonato(4-)]-, tetrasodium (P 96-1335).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHROMATE(4-), [7-AMINO-3-[(3-CHLORO-2-HYDROXY-5-
              NITROPHENYL)AZO]-4-HYDROXY-2-NAPHTHALENESULFONATO(3-)][6-
              AMINO-4-HYDROXY-3-[(2-HYDROXY-5-NITRO-3-SULFOPHENYL)AZO]-
              2-NAPHTHALENESULFONATO(4-)]-, TETRASODIUM (P 96-1335).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Chromate(4-), [7-   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          amino-3-[(3-                                                      12/31/2015
                          chloro-2-hydroxy-
                          5-
                          nitrophenyl)azo]-
                          4-hydroxy-2-
                          naphthalenesulfon
                          ato(3-)][6-amino-
                          4-hydroxy-3-[(2-
                          hydroxy-5-nitro-3-
                          sulfophenyl)azo]-
                          2-
                          naphthalenesulfon
                          ato(4-)]-,
                          tetrasodium (P 96-
                          1335) (CAS No.
                          184719-87-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.12.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

CATALOGUE COMMUN DES VARIÉTÉS DES ESPÈCES AGRICOLES

premier complément à la vingt-quatrième édition intégrale

(2006/C 80 A/01)

SOMMAIRE

Légende

Liste des espèces agricoles

I.   Betteraves

II.   Plantes fourragères

III.   Plantes oléagineuses et à fibres

IV.   Céréales

V.   Pommes de terre

----

LÉGENDE

----

(1)JO C 68 A du 21.3.2006, p. 1.

(2)JO L 193 du 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directive modifiée en dernier lieu par le règlement (CE) no 1829/2003 du Parlement européen et du Conseil (JO L 268 du 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

Rectificatifs

----

Rectificatif au Catalogue commun des variétés des espèces agricoles — vingt-quatrième édition intégrale

(«Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 68 A du 21 mars 2006)

(2006/C 80 A/02)

Page 7, au point 2:

au lieu de:

«depuis le 17 septembre 2004»,

lire:

«depuis le 28 février 2006».

----
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gregory R. Anderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 10, 2006





/s/  Gregory R. Anderson

Gregory R. Anderson

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 513 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 513

 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained by the 
United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and certain other 
                enemy belligerents to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

  Mr. Schock (for himself, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. 
  Hultgren, Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Roskam, Mr. 
   Schilling, Mr. Shimkus, and Mr. Walsh of Illinois) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained by the 
United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and certain other 
                enemy belligerents to the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 
              AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, AND CERTAIN OTHER ENEMY 
              BELLIGERENTS TO THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Prohibition.--None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 
available to any Federal department or agency may be used to transfer 
any individual described in subsection (b) to the United States.
    (b) Individual Described.--An individual described in this 
subsection is any individual who is--
            (1) detained by the United States at Naval Station, 
        Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; or
            (2) a foreign national who is--
                    (A) captured or detained outside the United States 
                as an enemy belligerent; and
                    (B) in the custody or under the effective control 
                of the Department of Defense.
    (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            (1) The term ``foreign national'' means an individual who 
        is not a citizen or national of the United States.
            (2) The term ``enemy belligerent'' includes a privileged 
        belligerent and an unprivileged enemy belligerent, as such 
        terms are defined by section 948a of title 10, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2012 (Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 21, 2012                                            
|                                                              
|/s/ David Gladstone                                           
|David Gladstone                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. does
hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2010/s/ Steven DongSteven DongChief Financial Officer
### Jaffe, Darren (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Rosenberg, Esta (OST) Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:34 PM Jaffe, Darren (OST) FW: FWIA exemption application for Bolivia sched all-cargo; DOT-OST-2012-0162



### From: Sauer, Edward W. [mailto:Edward.Sauer@squiresanders.com] 

### Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:48 

### AM To: Rosenberg, Esta (OST) 

### Subject: FWIA exemption application for Bolivia sched all-cargo; DOT-OST-2012-0162 Esta-l'm pleased to report that 

### I now have "no objections" from everyone on the service list. Please let me know ifyou need anything more. 

### FWIA is, ofcourse, asking us aboutthis. Thanks in advance, 

### ED 

## Edward W. Sauer Senior Counsel edward.sauer@squiresanders.com T +1 202 626 6641 

### 0 +1 202 626 6600 

### F +1 202 626 6780 M +1 301 928 7877 Squire Sanders (US) LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 www.squiresanders.com



## 37 Offices in 18 Countries This message is confidential and may be legallyprivileged or otherwiseprotected from disclosure. Ifyou are not the intendedrecipient, pleasetelephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; you mustnot copy or disclose the contents ofthis message or any attachmentto any other person. Squire Sanders (US) LLP is part ofthe international legal practice Squire Sanders which operates worldwide through a number ofseparate legal entities. Please visit www.squiresanders.com for more information. #US

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONDALE BERNARD SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00225-ALL)

Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne,

Appellate Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public

Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T.

Miller, United States Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United

States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rondale Bernard Smith appeals his 57-month prison

sentence, imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to distribution of

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000).

Smith’s only contention on appeal is that his sentence is

unreasonable.

When imposing a sentence after United States v. Booker,

543 U.S. 220 (2005), district courts must calculate the appropriate

Guidelines range, consider the range in conjunction with other

relevant factors under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.

2006), and impose a reasonable sentence. United States v.

Moreland, 437 F.3d 424, 432-33 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

2054 (2006). A sentence imposed within a properly calculated

Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable. United States v.

Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2309

(2006). Thus, Smith’s 57-month sentence is presumptively

reasonable, because it is within both the properly calculated

Guidelines range and the applicable statutory maximum. The record

reflects that the district court complied with § 3553(a), and

considered Smith’s personal history and circumstances in

determining his sentence. Having reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties on appeal, we find the sentence reasonable.

Therefore, we affirm Smith’s sentence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Part 1, Section B, Item 2(e) Chemical Structure Diagram**
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 649    | 312    | 1,029  | 652    | 682    | 963    | 6,248  | 570    | 402    | 287   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 145    | 1,016  | 311    | 705    | 15     | 922    | 142    | 4,257  | 570    | 447   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,012  | 358    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-049-CV

LLANO ROYALTY, LTD.	APPELLANT	

	V.

HERMAN SMITH & CO., LTD., 						APPELLEES

AND PATSY SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE KARLA 

G. SMITH 2001 IRREVOCABLE ASSET 

TRUST AND THE VICKI SMITH WEINBERG 

2001 IRREVOCABLE ASSET TRUST 

	----------

	FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  May 21, 2009