alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4830 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4830

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain glass fibers and articles 
                                thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain glass fibers and articles 
                                thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GLASS FIBERS AND ARTICLES THEREOF.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Glass fibers and   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          articles thereof:                                                 12/31/2015
                          slivers, rovings,
                          yarns and chopped
                          strands: rovings,
                          other (provided
                          for in subheading
                          7019.12.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Futura Pictures, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that:





(1)
the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,





(2)
the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated May 25, 2010

By:/s/ Buddy YoungBUDDY YOUNG,

Chief Executive Officer &

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4618 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4618

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used compression-
              ignition internal combustion piston engines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used compression-
              ignition internal combustion piston engines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN USED COMPRESSION-IGNITION INTERNAL COMBUSTION PISTON 
              ENGINES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain used compression-
ignition internal combustion piston engines) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Hawker Beechcraft Corporation



# Model 1900/1900C Airliner

Structural Inspection

Manual

TECHNICAL DATA CONTAINED IN THIS MANUAL IS FAA APPROVED

NOTE: This Manual was formerly called the BEECHCRAFT 1900/1900C Airliner Structural Inspection Manual.

Copyright © 2013 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation. All rights reserved. Hawker and Beechcraft are trademarks of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation. 1900 (UA-2, UA-3)

1900C (UB-1 thru UB-74)

(UC-1 thru UC-174)

P/N 98-30937 P/N 98-30937G2

Issued: March 24, 1989 Reissued: May 1, 2013 7/16/2013 1:51:33 PM

Page 1 of 2_____________________________________________________________________



# Published by Hawker Beechcraft Corporation

P.O. Box 85
Wichita, Kansas

67201-0085 USA

The export of these commodities, technology or softwa re are subject to the US Export Administration Regulations. Diversion contrary to US law is prohi bited. For guidance on export control requirements, contact the Commerce Department's Bureau of Export Administration at 202-482-4811 or visit the US Department of Commerce website. 7/16/2013 1:51:33 PM

Page 2 of 2
#### VALDEZ et al. v. YELLOW CAB CO. et al.

No. 12579.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Sept. 9, 1953.

*716Emanuel Gassman, San Antonio, for appellant.

W. Pat Camp, Sidney D. Callender, San Antonio, for appellees.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an action for damages by reason of the death of Desiderio Valdez, who was struck by a Yellow Cab while walking along the highway. The jury found that the cab driver, Manuel Davila, Jr., failed to keep a proper lookout, which was a proximate cause of the accident. They also found that Valdez was guilty of a number of negligent acts which were proximate causes of the accident. Upon the contributory negligence findings, judgment was rendered for defendants. Appellants do not attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support such findings, but contend that the court erred in failing to submit the theory that Manuel Davila, Jr., was guilty of negligence per se in exceeding the speed limit established by an ordinance of the City of San Antonio, and that the court erred in failing to hold that certain interrogations addressed to Manuel Davila, Jr., should be taken as answered in the affirmative, under the provisions of Rule 169, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The effect of such affirmative answers would be to convict Davila of further acts of negligence.

Appellants’ points do not present a reversible error. Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense and when established it avoids liability, although the defendant may have been guilty of one or more negligent acts or omissions proximately causing plaintiff’s injuries. In the absence of some special circumstance, not here present, an error, from the plaintiff’s standpoint, in the submission of his primary negligence issues, is regarded as harmless when it appears that the jury upon sufficient evidence has answered properly submitted contributory negligence issues unfavorably to plaintiff. The harmless error rule is likewise applicable to the improper admission or exclusion of evidence relating to such plaintiff’s primary negligence issues, so long as such evidence does not also bear upon the contributory negligence issues.

In this case, although in one particular Davila was found negligent, the judgment was rendered upon the jury’s findings of contributory negligence. Had he been found guilty of several acts of negligence, proximately causing the accident, the judgment still would have been for the defénd-ants. The errors, if any, urged by appellants are therefore harmless. Rule 434, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Brown & Root, Inc. v. Haddad, 142 Tex. 624, 180 S.W.2d 339; Miller v. Estep, Tex.Civ.App., 5 S.W.2d 876; 3 McDonald, Texas Civil Practice, § 12.37, p. 1170.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Network Engines, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Network Engines, Inc. and will be retained by Network Engines, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: May 15, 2003



LOGO

---

Douglas G. Bryant

Chief Financial Officer



38
Ricardo GarzaAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 28, 2014

N o s . 04

- 14

- 00232

- CR , 04

- 14

- 00233

- CR, & 04

- 14

- 00234

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

v.

Ricardo GARZA

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No s . 413042 , 413041, & 413040 The Honorable Michael La Hood, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Ricardo Garza was charged in three separate informations with the offenses of driving while intoxicated, possession of a dangerous drug, and possession of less than 38 grams of a controlled substance in penalty group 3. This is a State’s appeal from a tri al court’s order granting Garza’s “Motion to Change Venue.” In the motion, Garza expressly asked the trial court for “dismissal of these charges.” On March 11, 2014, the trial court rendered an order stating Garza’s motion “should [i]n all things be: GRA NTED.” The State filed a motion to clarify, seeking to determine whether this was a dismissal, which the State is entitled to appeal pursuant to article 44.01(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or merely an order transferring venue, which the State may not appeal. The record does not contain an order with regard to the State’s motion to clarify, and therefore, the State filed a motion in this court, asking that we abate the appeal and order the trial court to clarify its order on Garza’s “Motion to Cha nge Venue.”

Accordingly, we abated the appeals and ordered the trial court to clarify whether its March 11, 2014 order “dismissed” the informations or “transferred” the informations based on venue to Medina County. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.4(b). We hav e now received three supplemental clerk’s records containing a “Clarification of Trial Court’s Order” signed by the trial court on May 22, 2014. In the order, the trial court makes it clear that the charges in the three cases are not dismissed, but merely transferred to Medina County, which is the county of

proper venue.Accordingly, because article 44.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure does not appear to authorize the State to appeal from a trial court order transferring venue, we ORDER the ap peals REINSTATED , and we ORDER the State to show cause in writ ing in this court on

or before June 27, 2014 why these appeals should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If the State agree s the appeals should be dismissed, we OR DER the State to file a motion to dismiss the appe als in this court on or before June 9, 2014

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Co urt
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2244 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2244

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 67 Castle Street in Geneva, New York, as the ``Corporal Steven Blaine 
                         Riccione Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL STEVEN BLAINE RICCIONE POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 67 Castle Street in Geneva, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Corporal Steven Blaine Riccione Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Steven Blaine Riccione Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 12.1KRATONPolymers LLCRatio of Earnings to Fixed Charges000’s                                                   Predecessor                   Period from  Period from                      December 23  January1,      Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended  through  through  Year Ended   December  December  December  December  December 31,  December 23,  December   31, 2007  31, 2006  31, 2005  31, 2004  2003  2003  31, 2002 Fixed Charges:                                                         + Interest expensed  42,608   39,916   32,303   34,247   518   36,775   32,982 + Interest capitalized  —   —   —   —   —   —   — + Amortization of deferred financing costs  2,715   2,351   2,262   5,563   38   13,370   3,763 + Accretion of debt discount  —   —   —   —   —   8,505   1,044 + Estimate of interest within rental expense  2,449   2,449   2,267   2,133   33   2,033   1,867 + Preferance security dividend requirements  —   —   —   —   —   —   —                                                    Total fixed charges  47,772   44,716   36,832   41,943   589   60,683   39,656                              Earnings:                                                         + Pre-tax income (loss)  (37,605)  22,068   34,179   (54,794)  (3,406)  12,870   52,332 - Income from equity investees  (626)  (168)  (1,516)  (462)  (28)  (621)  (1,171)+ fixed charges  47,772   44,716   36,832   41,943   589   60,683   39,656 + Amortization of capitalized interest  —   —   —   —   —   —   — + Distributed income of equity investees  106   1,265   461   561   —   1,064   710 + Pre-tax losses of equity investeesfor which charges arising from guaranteesare included in fixed charges  —   —   —   —   —   —   — - Interest capitalized  —   —   —   —   —   —   — - Preferance security dividend requirements  —   —   —   —   —   —   — - The minority interest in pre-tax income ofsubsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges  —   —   —   —   —   —   —                                                    Total Earnings  9,647   67,881   69,956   (12,752)  (2,845)  73,996   91,527                              Deficiency (Surplus)  38,125   (23,165)  (33,124)  54,695   3,434   (13,313)  (51,871)                                                   Ratio  0.20   1.52   1.90   (0.30)  (4.83)  1.22   2.31                              Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  0.2:1.0   1.5:1.0   1.9:1.0   —   —   1.2:1.0   2.4:1.0 Our earnings were insufficient to cover our fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2004 by approximately $54.7 million and for the period from December 23though December 31, 2003 by approximately $3.4 million.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

5, 2011 On April 13 th , 2011 we held a conference call with the Hy brid Manufacturers Regulatory Collaboration ( HMRC ) to discuss conc erns raised by HMRC members regarding heavy- duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing . C oncern s were raised during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy- duty hy brid applications may not b e able to meet the 2013 heavy- duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1 , 2 Specifically , they have request ed a delay

of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2020. A ttendees from the EPA an d HMRC are shown . The agenda for the meeting is presented on the following page of this memo. **Attendee Affiliation**  Cleophas Jackson EPA

– Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Anthony Neam EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Amy Kopin EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Barbara Chance Allison Transmission Kevin Rodgers Allison Transmission Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation Tom Apalenek BAE Sy stems

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards f or Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Eng ines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds , ” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL V EHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498 **Joint HMRC -**  **EPA Call Regarding Heavy -**  **Duty Hybrid OBD**

**April 13, 2011 Agenda**  

### 1. Current Tec hnology a. Wh at capability do production systems have today? 2. Industry’s Interim Plans a. Specific monitor and/or other difficulties they anticipate having. b. W hat monitors will be functional and which will not be functional. c. Interim plan if there is a delay. d. How to ensure tampering won’t occur if OBD implementation is delayed/limited. e. How to ensure system is functioning properly if OBD is delayed/limited. 3. Standardization and Communications a. Wh at are specific concerns with J1939? b. HMRC states that HD hybrid system m anufacturers do not “have access to OBD system [engine] data,” is this issue being actively resolved? 4. 

### Review OBD requirements for alternative fuels. 5. 

### Next Steps OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
PAF Modeling Matrix

Run Unit

H2SO4

Emissions 

(ppm)

Filterable 

Particulate 

Emissions 

(lbs/MMBtu)

1 1or 2 17.7 0.11

2 1or 2 7.0 0.11

3 1or 2 1.8 0.015

4 1or 2 1.8 0.03

5 3 17.6 0.038

6 3 7 0.038

7 3 1.8 0.015
|                                                                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                            
|North Dakota Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                            
|North Dakota Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 14     | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023