alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A 

DCT-QSr-lW'1*^11 

Manistee County Board of Commissioners 

UUUL 

CHAIRPERSON 

Jim Krolczyk 

VICE-CHAIRPERSON 

Ken Hilliard 

Manistee County Courthouse • 415 Third Street • Manistee, Michigan 49660 

CLERK 

Marilyn Kliber 

(231) 723-3331 

CONTROLLER/ADMINISTRATOR 

Thomas Kaminski 

(231) 398-3500 

January 5, 2012 

Duane Anderson 

Ervin Kowalski 

Glenn Lottie 

Carl Rutske 

Richard Schmidt 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

n iii 

Oi? ^ 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

On January 3, 2012, the seven elected members of the Manistee County Board of 

Commissioners voted unanimously to support the proposal of the Manistee Blacker Airport 

Authority to participate in the Alternate Essential Air Service Pilot Program. 

Commercial airline service at Manistee County Blacker Airport provides Manistee County and 

the surrounding areas a vital link to the national transportation system. Quality air 

transportation is critical for the area's present and future economic development. 

The Commissioners agree with the Airport Authority that the best option of retaining quality air 

service for the area Is to pursue participation In the Alternate Essential Air Service Pilot Program. 

Participation in this program will provide the flexibility needed to continue service with the class 

of commuter aircraft (19 to 30+ seat aircraft) we feel is necessary for quality service that 

passengers desire and will actually use. The plan for service to a hub In Chicago also aligns 

with the needs of the community and especially the tourism industry. 

Manistee County Blacker Airport has experienced significant growth over the course of several 

years. Enplanements in 2010 were nearly three times higher than the levels seen during the 

early 2000's. In 2011, enplanements were nearly ten times higher than those previous levels. 

The economic Impact of these Increases is significant to the community. We believe that the 

Alternate Essential Air Service proposal is the best path forward in the effort to retain all or 

most of this growth. The other options available to the airport and community would likely lead 

to significantly reduced utilization of the service being provided. 

We urge your thoughtful consideration and approval of the Alternate Essential Air Service 

proposal put forth by the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority. 

Sincerely, 

les FyKrolczyk, Chai 

lanisjee County Board of Commlssione 

CC: Barry Lind, Airport Manager 

Thomas D. Kaminski, Manistee County Controller/Administrator 

Manistee County Board of Commissioners [rn h:\correspondence\devany 010512]
EXHIBIT  99.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-QSB of
Standard  Capital Corporation (the "Company") for the nine months ended May 31,
2004,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I,  E.  Del  Thachuk,  Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best of my knowledge and belief:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.



Date:  October 24, 2005
                        /s/   "E.  Del  Thachuk"
                 -------------------------------
                              E.  Del  Thachuk
                          Chief  Executive  Officer,
                            President  and  Director
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves from Less than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves from Less than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 499    | 508    | 493    | 336    | 456    | 557    | 532    | 583   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 606    | 524    | 558    | 455    | 421    | 440    | 358    | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 11     | 40     | 108   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 87     | 44     | 55     | 63     | 56     | 62     | 94     | 35     | 37     | 20    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 22     | 27     | 19     | 16     | 13     | 42     | 75     | 118    | 113   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 156    | 287    | 139    | 127    | 64     | 111    | 112    | 198    | 333    | 43    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 59     | 38     | 162    | 158    | 1,490  | 1,557  | 2,566  | 1,980  | 9,071  | 4,005 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,130  | 3,268  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,106  | 1,561  | 860    | 1,915  | 1,520  | 769    | 2,624  | 1,218  | 632    | 186   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,034  | 474    | 830    | 464    | 454    | 466    | 126    | 47     | 250    | 666   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 106    | 12     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### COSAND et al. v. GRAY WOLFE CO.

No. 12617.

Court of Civil Appeals of *Texas.*Galveston.

Nov. 19, 1953.

Wiesenthal & Stolbun, Bernard S. Stol-bun, Houston, for appellants.

Chilton Bryan and E. H. Patton, Jr., Houston, for appellee.

HAMBLEN, Jr., Chief Justice.

The following statement of this case is taken from the statement contained in appellants’ brief, which is admitted to be correct by both parties:

This case originated in the District Court of Harris County, Texas. Thelma Cosand and husband, Frank Cosand, sued Gray Wolfe Company, Inc., for damages resulting from an accident upon a public thoroughfare within the city limits of Houston, Texas. Upon the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ evidence the defendant moved the court to instruct a verdict in its favor, urging as one ground therefor that the suit was brought against Gray Wolfe Company and service of citation secured on this company whereas the truck and trailer involved in a collision with plaintiffs was owned by Grey Wolf Drilling Company, which latter company was also the employer of C. B, Derrick, driver of the truck. The asserted error of the trial court in granting such motion is the basis for this appeal.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The facts above stated as ground for defendant’s motion are undisputed. In addition the evidence conclusively shows that Gray Wolfe Company, Inc., and Grey Wolf Drilling Company, though having common officers and directorates, are legally separate corporations; that only Gray Wolfe Company, Inc., was served with citation or entered an appearance in the court below and that the driver of the truck at the time of the collision, made the basis of the suit, was furthering only the business of Grey Wolf Drilling Company, his sole employer. This case then is not one involving misnomer of a party-defendant wherein the proper defendant, though misnamed, is before the court and subject to its jurisdiction. This is a case wherein the defendant, against whom plaintiffs’ cause *548of action, if any, exists, is not before the court and not subject to the court’s jurisdiction. As such it falls squarely within and is governed by the rule announced in Gillette Motor Transport Co. v. Whitfield, Tex.Civ.App., 160 S.W.2d 290, and in Wichita Falls & S. R. Co. v. Foreman, Tex.Civ.App., 109 S.W.2d 549.

 The record here presented lends no support to the theories of agency and estoppel, upon which appellants apparently seek to escape the controlling effect of the two cited cases. The fact that corporations have common officers and directors is insufficient to establish agency. 10 Tex. Jur. 1019-1020. The two cases above cited are themselves authority for the proposition that mere silence where no duty to speak exists, which is the most this record discloses, falls short of creating an estoppel.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

NORDIC INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants.

NO. 6:20-CV-00064 (ADA) 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.’S NOTICE OF PETITIONS FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF 

U.S. PATENT NO. 6,345,095 AND U.S. PATENT NO. 7,590,097 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

(collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”) hereby submit notice that on September 9, 2020 and 

September 10, 2020, Samsung filed Inter Partes Review petitions with the Patent Trial and 

Appeal Board against the two Patents-in-Suit. In particular, Samsung petitioned review of all 

asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,345,095 (IPR No. 2020-01603) and all asserted claims of 

U.S. Patent No. 7,590,097 (IPR No. 2020-01605). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is 

expected to decide whether to institute review on both petitions by no later than March 10, 2021. 

Dated: September 11, 2020 By: Jin-Suk Park 

Jin-Suk Park 

Marc A. Cohn (pro hace vice) 

ARNOLD & PORTER 

601 Massachusetts Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20001-3743 

Tel: 202-942-5000 

Jin.Park@arnoldporter.com 

Marc.Cohn@arnoldporter.com 
2 

Ryan J. Casamiquela (pro hac vice) 

ARNOLD & PORTER 

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Tel: 415-471-3373 

Ryan.Casamiquela@arnoldporter.com 

Michael E. Jones 

State Bar No. 10929400 

POTTER MINTON, P.C. 

110 N. College Ave., Suite 500 

Tyler, TX 75702 

Tel: 903-597-8311 

mikejones@potterminton.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 11, 2020, I electronically filed this 

document with the Clerk of Court via the Court’s CM/ECF system which will send notification 

of such filing to all counsel of record, all of whom have consented to electronic service in this 

action. 

/s/ Jin-Suk Park 

Jin-Suk Park
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                            
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Arkansas Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25245]



[[Page 59257]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33935]


Detroit Connecting Railroad Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company

    Detroit Connecting Railroad Company (DCON), a noncarrier, has filed 
a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire and operate 
approximately 2.27 miles of rail line owned by Adrian & Blissfield Rail 
Road Company. The line, known as the ``Dequindre Line,'' is part of 
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated's Holly Subdivision at 
Detroit, Wayne County, MI, and runs between milepost 1.77 and milepost 
4.04. \1\ DCON certifies that its projected revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class 
I rail carrier, and further certifies that its projected annual 
revenues will not exceed $5 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company-Acquisition 
Exemption-Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated, STB Finance 
Docket No. 33692 (STB served Dec. 28, 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
September 28, 2000.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33935, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Kenneth J. Bisdorf, 2301 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 600, 
Troy, MI 48084-3329.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: September 26, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-25245 Filed 10-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P