alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JIMMY WILLIAMSON, PARTNER*

ROSS A. SEARS, II, PARTNER *

CYNDI MOSS RUSNAK, PARTNER

MIKE KERENSKY, OF COUNSEL*

WILLIAM W. DILLS, ASSOCIATE

JESUS CHAPA, ASSOCIATE

AMY B. ARCHAMBAULT, ASSOCIATE

CHRISTINA SOILEAU, ASSOCIATE

*CERTIFIED PERSONAL INJURY 

TRIAL LAW - TEXAS BOARD OF 

LEGAL SPECIALIZATION

WILLIAMSON, SEARS 

& RUSNAK, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MARCH 31, 2015 

JIMMY@WSRLAWFIRM.COM

ROSS@WSRLAWFIRM.COM

CYNDI@WSRLAWFIRM.COM

MIKE@WSRLAWFIRM.COM

WILLIAMSONSEARSRUSNAK.COM

(713) 223-3330 (OFFICE) 

(855) 972-7783 (TOLL FREE) 

(713) 223-0001 (FAX) 

4310 YOAKUM BLVD. 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006

Via e-Filing

Supreme Court of Texas 

Attention: Blake Hawthorne, Clerk 

PO Box 12248 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Re: No. 15-0205; In the Supreme Court of Texas; In re David Dow vs. The Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals 

Dear Mr. Hawthorne,

After reading David Dow’s petition and supporting evidence, the undersigned attorneys 

respectfully request our names be added to the list of lawyers who join in its request for relief. 

As members of the bar, we have a duty to stand against injustice. What the Court of 

Criminal Appeals has done to David Dow is a personal injustice, and an institutional wrong done 

to those least able to stand up for themselves, indigents. In these economic times, a systemic attack 

on lawyers who work pro bono to ensure that all Americans have equal access to the court system 

is disturbing. 

We agree with Judge Alcala that the decision regarding Mr. Dow is: “unwise, excessive, 

unjust to victims, and chilling to defendants and other attorneys.” The decision was wrong. 

Texas needs David Dow to continue his work representing those who have nowhere else 

to turn and providing the bar with an example of what it means to be a lawyer-servant. Mr. Dow 

is the type of lawyer we should all aspire to be. 

We are honored to add our names to support Mr. Dow’s petition, and urge the Supreme 

Court to return Mr. Dow to his essential work. 

 Sincerely,

/s/ Jimmy Williamson

Jimmy Williamson

SBN 21624100

/s/Cyndi Moss Rusnak

Cyndi Moss Rusnak 

SBN 24007964 

/s/ Ross A. Sears, II

Ross A. Sears, II 

SBN 17960011

/s/ Michael Kerensky

Michael Kerensky

SBN 11331500 

/s/ William Dills

William Dills

SBN 24067421

/s/ Jesus Chapa

Jesus Chapa 

SBN 24075891

/s/ Amy B. Archambault

Amy Archambault

SBN 24055110 

/s/ Christina Soileau

Christina Soileau

SBN 24085925

FILED

15-0205

3/31/2015 3:18:58 PM

tex-4714416

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Supreme Court of Texas

Attention: Blake Hawthorne, Clerk

March 31, 2015

Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(d) and (e), I certify that I have served 

this document on all parties of record via electronic service on March 31, 2015.

/s/ Amy B. Archambault

Amy B. Archambault
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4922 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phosphoric acid, lanthanum 

salt, cerium terbium-doped. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on phosphoric 

acid, lanthanum salt, cerium terbium-doped. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID, LANTHANUM SALT, CE4 RIUM TERBIUM-DOPED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.77 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 phosphoric acid, lanthanum salt, cerium terbium-doped) 

8 is amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4922 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### FOWLER v. STATE.

No. 27041.

Court of Criminal Appeals of *Texas.*

June 16, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*385GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County. The punishment assessed is a fine of $400.

No notice of appeal appears in the record. In the absence thereof this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DORETHA SELBY

- DIGGS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:14

- cr - 00137

- RBS

- RJK

- 2 )

Submitted : May 2 5 , 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Doretha Selby

- Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; V. Kathleen Dougherty, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished op inions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Doretha Selby

- Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel the filing of a motion for a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance

. We have reviewed the recor d and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Selby

- Diggs , No. 2:14

- cr - 00137

- RBS

- RJK

- 2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                                                            
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                                            
|Dated: July 13, 2010 | /s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.
Louis Vucci, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                     |                                                                                            



---



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Victor Petrone, Chief Financial Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                                                                                          
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                                                                          
|Dated: July 13, 2010 | /s/ Victor Petrone
Victor Petrone 
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.52

                     SUMMARY OF FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC
                           LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE PLAN


         The Company adopted the Long-Term Performance Plan ("LTPP") in 2000.
The Compensation Committee administers the LTPP but obtains input from senior
management when appropriate. The executives who are part of the strategic
planning group are eligible to participate.

         Target incentive awards are earned over a four-year period. Awards are
based on the participant's current base salary. Participants can earn more or
less than the targeted amounts for their salary depending on the level of
achievement of the financial performance.

         The performance measure for all SBUs and for corporate is total return
on capital or increase in value (defined as cash available plus the change in
net current value for the four-year plan period). The LTPP established certain
performance objectives for each SBU and corporate. The Compensation Committee,
with input from senior management, also sets threshold and maximum performance
objectives. Participants earn a percentage of the target incentive depending on
where between the threshold and maximum their performance falls. The LTPP also
includes the provision for stock option grants in addition to payments made
based on total return measurement.

         The LTPP established gatekeeping measures similar to measures under the
MIP. The current gatekeeping measures are (1) continued use of non-recourse
debt; (2) reportable cash flow on average for the four-year equal to or better
than the year preceding the performance period; and (3) a debt leverage of 75
percent or less.

         Payments pursuant to the LTPP are made to participants at the end of
the four-year performance period. The payments are made in cash. Participants
can elect to defer up to 50 percent of their payment.

         In general, only participants employed by the Company at the end of the
plan year are eligible for incentive payments. However, death, permanent
disability or retirement of a participant during the year will lead to a prorata
payment based on the number of months of employment completed during the year.
Participants whose employment terminates for any other reason are not eligible
for an annual incentive payment.

         The Compensation Committee has the right to change the LTPP provisions
at any time. Changes could include taking into account mergers and acquisitions,
external equity financings, extraordinary gains or losses and the like. The
Compensation Committee will also evaluate sale of properties with proceeds that
are greater than a specified amount to determine whether such a sale should be
included in LTPP payout calculations.
Order entered June 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00340-CV

T. CHRISTIAN COOPER, Appellant

V.

SANDERS H. CAMPBELL/RICHARD T. MULLEN, INC. 

D/B/A THE MULLEN COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-15127

ORDER

We GRANT the June 2, 2015 motion of Sheretta Martin, Official Court Reporter for the 

162nd Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The 

reporter’s record shall be filed by JUNE 22, 2015. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4906 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Uvinul 3039. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CLARKE of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Uvinul 3039. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UVINUL 3039. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Ethylhexyl-2-cyano-3,3- 

diphenylacrylate (CAS No. 

6197–30–4) (provided for 

in subheading 2926.90.48) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4906 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4747 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4747

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetrahydrothiophene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetrahydrothiophene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Tetrahydrothiophen  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          e (CAS No. 110-01-                                                12/31/2015
                          0) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2934.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
— (DFFI^F (OF ft£ £LEAK

cjbuki of mmmL appfbls -mt£ of wchz

/qus7i7Jy7Z^«s nsm

*£' EX PARTE OlFfflM JBM L/MftftY

CLf\ WPXi /vld.

<^3/-3^ /

bvkI) mrr fa i - T5E

' ft£/)S£ ML: Bi Tttfc £J^G/IA(Rrr FILE OF 77-lb A6flii£ tXTIGflmJ, TNb YMAI06E QFr/^ftni3^^AbbRESg,//0OrlC£>A)t) AS R3LUMJii:

MR. QIFTOAl £TS^RV FRRMQS * *l%5/n

; HMUioir F^j-j5e»

I <2I FA/1 247

! HUDTSOUlf, TEXAS 1111&

ALL FUFlIRF CjQRkEZPmmCB StittlLb fit /OOTEMbaRB$ A£> SfflJHi flfiflUE !

I , DOI\E ADA £X£aj-R2>, OA3 THUS 7T4£ 33ni. 2M OF bhCRft&Bl ,

20 l4 . "

CC PHP

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 05 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

77-Jt UA&EAS WATT BEFORE THE COURT IS UNGGR "flKfl" LAflfMtV,

IflLL" CflhftESP/JAifiaiCe SHAULB fit AMKESSEh ANNATE* A&ftVE1: '
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Courtside Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|                |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----------------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| March 16, 2007 |  |  | By: /s/ Richard D. Goldstein                                                                                     |
|           |  |  |        Richard D. Goldstein       Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                 |
| March 16, 2007 |  |  | By: /s/ Carl D. Harnick                                             |
|           |  |  |        Carl D. Harnick       Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                |

----
**Exhibit
      99.2**








**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February
      28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, E. Del Thachuk, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:
      March 19, 2007





E.
      DEL
      THACHUK


E.
      Del
      Thachuk


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director





-1-
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2022

No. 04-21-00471-CR

Caleb Patrick DANIELS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-10-00155-CRF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due March 31, 2022; however, the court granted an 

extension of time to file the brief until May 2, 2022. On April 18, 2022, appellant filed a motion 

requesting until June 2, 2022 to file the brief. We grant in part the motion and order appellant’s 

attorney, to file the brief by May 31, 2022. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time 

will be granted absent a motion, filed by the date the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates 

extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel 

has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief 

will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally 

consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### KEETON v. STATE.

No. 25602.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 19, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Cr. Dist. Atty., James K. Allen, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., Dallas, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction of rape with the penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception. The proceedings appear to be regular in every respect and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION

I, Larry Mosley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2010

/s/ Larry MosleyCFO and Director