alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) I, Jeffrey P. Gotschall, certify that:  1.
    I have read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SIFCO Industries, Inc.2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal
controls and procedures to be designated under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; andb.
    paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986; andc.
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andb.
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  a.
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 23, 2005
    
    /s/ Jeffrey P. GotschallJeffrey P. GotschallChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
 1
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

                                AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                     TO THE
                           PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST
                           1996 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


     This Third Amendment to the Prentiss Properties Trust 1996 Share Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") as amended by the First Amendment to the Plan, dated effective
as of May 6, 1997, and the Second Amendment to the Plan, dated effective as of
May 5, 1998, hereby amends the Plan as follows effective as of May 9, 2001:

     1.   Section 5.01 which describes the maximum aggregate number of shares
          issuable under the Plan, is hereby amended by deleting the fourth
          sentence and inserting in its place the following sentence:

          "The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under this
          Plan is 5,000,000 Shares, subject to increase and adjustment as
          provided in this Article V and Article XII."

     2.   As amended by the foregoing, the Plan shall remain in full force and
          effect.


Dated:  May 9, 2001


                              PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST


                              By:  /s/ Thomas F. August
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Thomas F. August
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominique Fousse, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufiicy, J.), rendered June 1, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

This judgment of conviction emanates from an altercation between the defendant and Donovan Carty, which resulted in the latter’s death. On appeal, the defendant does not dispute the fact that he is responsible for Carty’s death, but argues that his actions were justified since he was acting in self-defense, and that the People failed to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree.

It is axiomatic that justification is not a defense to the use of deadly physical force unless the actor reasonably believes that another person is about to use deadly physical force against him and he is unable to retreat safely *(see,*Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; *see also, People v Goetz,*68 NY2d 96). The evidence at trial established that following an initial confrontation between Carty and the defendant, the defendant retreated. The defendant thereafter retrieved a shotgun, which he had hidden, and returned to the scene of the initial altercation. Several witnesses testified that at this point, the defendant approached Carty, pointed the gun at his chest and fired a shot. Although there was some indication that Carty had threatened the defendant earlier in the evening, it is undisputed that none of the witnesses, or the defendant, ever observed Carty carrying a weapon. In light of the foregoing, we conclude that there was ample evidence to enable the jury to find that the defendant initiated the incident which caused Carty’s death, and was not acting in self-defense at that time *(see, People v Thompson,*125 AD2d 511; *People v Reyes,*116 AD2d 602). Moreover, the defendant had every opportunity to retreat safely, without resorting to the use of deadly force *(see,*Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; *People v Richardson,*155 AD2d 488). Accordingly, the finding that the defendant’s actions were not justified was supported by legally sufficient evidence *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), and was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Hooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 324    | 507    | 0      | 0      | 2,305  | 735    | 1,013  | 2,053  | 20     | 434   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 482    | 20     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 44     | -35   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -22    | 44     | 307    | 4      | -44    | -65    | -68    | -45    | -424   | 260   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 126    | 136    | 43     | -82    | -63    | 44     | -40    | 97     | -56   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 135    | 13     | 40     | 113    | 65     | -11    | 17     | -4     | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -80    | 134    | 289    | -582   | -20    | 177    | 144    | -251   | 56     | 230   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 66     | 211    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

t0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144353

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144353

COA: 306045

Calhoun CC: 1989

- 000893

- FC

PAUL ANDRE BLANTON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8 , 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -0XLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006,as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank Aiello, President of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 28,2007                            /s/ Frank Aiello
                                         ----------------------------------
                                             Frank Aiello
                                             President/CEO/ Principal
                                             Accounting Officer
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

BREE MCCLESKEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOLTECA ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A 

THE PHOENIX RECOVERY GROUP, & 

SINGER MANAGEMENT, LLC, & 

GEORGETOWN PLACE, LTD. a/k/a 

GEORGETOWN PLACE APARTMENTS, 

& TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 

SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, 

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-00166-ML 

JOINT STIPULATION AND NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. #47) 

Plaintiff Bree McCleskey (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Georgetown Place, Ltd. 

(“Georgetown Place”) and Singer Management, LLC (“Singer”) file this Joint Stipulation and 

Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss, respectfully show the Court as follows: 

1. On November 20, 2020, the Court rendered an order granting Plaintiff’s Opposed 

Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. #25.) Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint named Georgetown Place, Singer, and Travelers as additional defendants. 

(Dkt. #26.) 

2. On March 3, 2021, Georgetown Place and Singer filed their Motion to Dismiss. 

(Dkt. #47.) 

3. On March 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. #50.) 

Plaintiff additionally filed an Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint out of an abundance of caution. (Dkt. #51.) 

Case 1:20-cv-00166-ML Document 52 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 3
2

4. Plaintiff, Georgetown Place, and Singer stipulate that Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint has effectively mooted Georgetown Place and Singer’s Motion to Dismiss the claims 

asserted in Plaintiff’s prior pleading. 

5. Accordingly, Georgetown Place and Singer give notice that they are withdrawing 

their Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #47.) 

6. Georgetown Place and Singer intend to file its responsive pleading on or before 

March 24, 2021, to the Second Amended Complaint. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Brent A. Devere 

Brent A. Devere 

SBN#00789256 

1411 West Avenue, Suite #200 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Ph: 512-457-8080 Fax: 512-457-8060 

Email: BDevere@1411west.com 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

-AND- 

______________________________ 

Daniel Durell 

State Bar No. 24078450 

daniel.durell@lockelord.com 

LOCKE LORD LLP

600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200 

Austin, Texas 78701-3055 

Telephone: (512) 305-4700 

Facsimile: (512) 305-4800 (Facsimile) 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 

GEORGETOWN PLACE AND SINGER 

Case 1:20-cv-00166-ML Document 52 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon all counsel of record as indicated below on this 17th day of March 2021:

VIA ECF 

Brent A. Devere 

1411 West Avenue, Suite #200 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Ph: 512-457-8080 Fax: 512-457-8060 

Email: BDevere@l411west.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

VIA ECF

Tom Clarke 

8026 Vantage Dr. #105 

San Antonio, Texas 78230 

Attorney for Phoenix and Travelers 

Counsel for Georgetown Place and Singer 

Case 1:20-cv-00166-ML Document 52 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William M. Clancy, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ William M. Clancy
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                   William M. Clancy
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
                                                   November 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath 
Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the 
Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss 
et seq.). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations 
to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath 
River Basin. The objective of this meeting is to review the progress of 
the 2000 Klamath chinook salmon fishing season and plan for fishery 
management in 2001. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 1:00 p.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000; from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m. on Thursday, October 26, 2000; and from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on 
Friday, October 27, 2000.
    Place: The meeting will be held at the Yreka Fish and Wildlife 
Office, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, 
California 96097, telephone (530) 842-5763.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For background information on the Klamath 
Council, please refer to the notice of their initial meeting that 
appeared in the Federal Register on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).

    Dated: September 25, 2000.
Elizabeth H. Stevens.
California/Nevada Operations Manager, California/Nevada Office, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 00-25147 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-080-1430-EU; NMNM 104317]


Notice of Realty Action; Environmental Assessment for 
Noncompetitive Sale of Public Lands in Eddy County; Cancellation and 
Termination of Segregation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Cancellation and termination of segregation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice cancels the Notice of Realty Action located in the 
second column, 65 FR 48251, publish August 7, 2000, as FR Doc. 00-
19918. This Notice also terminates the segregation associated with the 
Notice of Realty Action.

DATES: Cancellation of the Notice of Realty Action and termination of 
the segregation is effective upon publication of this notice. The land 
will be open to entry at 8:00 am on October 30, 2000.

    Dated: September 20, 2000.
Mary Jo Rugwell,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-25028 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4438 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSULFURON-SODIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 N-[[(4,6-Dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-3- 

7 (2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-2-pyridinesulfonamide monosodium 

8 salt (trifloxysulfuron-sodium)) is amended by striking the 

9 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

10 2015’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4438 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Addendum to the call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’ (FP6-2006-Mobility-13)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 35 of 11 February 2006)

(2006/C 52/10)

The ‘Researchers' Nights 2006’ shall concern events organised exclusively on 22 September 2006. However, due to the national public holiday taking place in Israel on that date in 2006, the Commission will consider proposals from Israel concerning events to be held on the closest date possible to 22 September 2006.

----