alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-12-428-E 

August 13, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10602 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0618 

Mr. Maximus Yaney 

Titan Aerospace 

P.O. Box 87035-1129 

Moriarty, NM 87035 

Dear Mr. Yaney: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 4, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Titan Aerospace for an exemption from §§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) and (b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption will allow Titan Aerospace 

to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that does not carry and display the aircraft’s 

airworthiness, certification, and registration documents required under part 91. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Titan Aerospace. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8607 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that it is unnecessary to carry and display the airworthiness, certification, and 

registration documents in UASs for the operation described by the petitioner. The original 

intent of the subject regulations was to display the airworthiness and registration documents 

so they would be easily available to the FAA inspectors and passengers. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No 8607; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8607 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Titan Aerospace an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 91.9(b)(2) 

and 91.203(a) and (b) to the extent necessary to allow Titan Aerospace to operate a UAS that 

does not carry and display the aircraft’s airworthiness, certification, and registration 

documents required under part 91, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot in 

command of the UAS anytime the aircraft is operating. 

2. Those documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be made available 

within 10 days to any FAA, U.S. Department of Defense, or law enforcement 

official. 

3. This exemption is not valid for operations outside the United States. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

MASTEROBJECTS, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION No. 6:20-cv-00087-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER 

VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO THE AUSTIN DIVISION

Came on for consideration this date Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue 

to the Northern District of California or, in the Alternative, to the Austin Division (the “Motion to 

Transfer”). The Court has considered the Motion to Transfer, all responsive pleadings, and the 

case record, and is of the opinion that the Motion to Transfer is meritorious, and it is therefore 

ORDERED that that Motion to Transfer filed on June 4, 2020 is GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00087-ADA; MasterObjects, Inc. 

v. Facebook, Inc. be TRANSFERRED to _______________________________. 

It is further ORDERED that, if transferred to the Austin Division of the Western District 

to Texas, the case remain on the docket of the United States District Judge Alan D Albright.

SIGNED on this the _______ day of _______________________, 2020.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00087-ADA Document 37-3 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5058 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Violet 1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Violet 1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.60 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Violet 1) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4592 

To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetic acid, sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetic acid, 

sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHLOROACETIC ACID, SODIUM SALT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.34 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Chloroacetic acid, sodium salt) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4592 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthTrust Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wallace
D. Malone, Jr., principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

By:  /s/ Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
     __________________________

Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SouthTrust Corporation and will be retained by SouthTrust
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       38
#### NORTH PENN GLASS & MIRROR CO. v. POWELL.

No. 12686.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 12, 1954.

Joseph B. Dibrell, Seguin, for appellant.

Robert E. Houssiere and Elbert R. Jandt, Seguin, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiff, North Penn Glass and Mirror Company, instituted this suit against Sophie Powell, individually and as gimrdian of the estate of Rose Renee Powell, a minor, for a debt claimed to be due on an open account created by A. S. Powell, her deceased husband. Defendants assert many defenses, but the judgment for the defendants recites that the court based its decision on a plea to the jurisdiction of the trial court, because the suit was a claim within four years from the death of A. S. Powell, and the probate court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. Since we have no statement of facts, we must presume that the evidence was in support of the facts recited in the judgment. The judgment states that all parties were before the court, that the case was heard upon certain undisputed facts, that no administration has been had in the probate court of Guadalupe County, that the probate court has jurisdiction over the estate of A. S. Powell, deceased, and that a necessity exists for such an administration; that four years have not elapsed since the death of A. S. Powell; that a partition between Sophie Powell, individually, and Rose Powell, a minor, was attempted by the probate court, but'that the attempted partition was void and a nullity, and that the estate is still under the sole jurisdiction of the probate court.

Appellant’s sole point is that the defendants partitioned the estate between themselves, which entitled it to proceed direct■ly against the defendants. Appellant re-dies upon Byrd v. Ellis, Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W. 1070, and Patterson v. Allen, 50 Tex. 23. The point assumes that there was a partition, but the defendants deny that there has been a partition, and the trial court has entered a judgment upholding their contention that the attempted partition is void. If the trial court was in er*478ror in holding that the attempted partition was null and void, we have nothing before us to demonstrate the error. For the reasons stated in Bednarz v. State, 142 Tex. 138, 176 S.W.2d 562, in the absence of a statement of facts, we must presume that the issues were tried without objection and that the evidence supports the trial court’s judgment. Rules 67 and 90, T. R.C.P.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -3     | 121    | 615   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -56    | -676   | 268    | 1,075  | -363   | -77    | 264    | -260   | 302    | 142   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 42     | 88     | 89     | 36     | 87     | 40     | 101    | -71    | -179   | -75   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 31     | 148    | 97     | -138   | -78    | 129    | 138    | 210    | 70    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 127    | -99    | -41    | -328   | -426   | 881    | 208    | 446    | 1,176  | -654  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -2,944 | 199    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5134 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5134

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain surge protectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain surge protectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SURGE PROTECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Duplex surge        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          protection                                                        12/31/2015
                          receptacles for a
                          voltage not
                          exceeding 250v
                          alternating
                          current, each
                          with monitor
                          light to indicate
                          the device is
                          protecting the
                          circuit (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8536.30.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4964 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzenesulfonyl chloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzenesulfonyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzenesulfonyl chloride 

(CAS No. 98–09–9) (provided for in subheading 

2904.10.08) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4964 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 527    | 191    | 942    | 647    | 938    | 622    | 6,286  | 166    | 6      | 66    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 869    | 5      | 327    | 12     | 2,267  | 283    | 7,431  | 1,394  | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 317    | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40447

Conference Calendar

 

KELJER KING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL 

DIVISION; UNIDENTIFIED TROUT, Doctor,

Coffield Unit; KEITH J. PRICE, Warden,

Coffield Unit; WINDHAM SCHOOL DIRECTOR,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division; GEORGE BUSH, JR,

Governor, State of Texas; NOEL J. WINNER,

LT, Law Library,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CV-44

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Keljer King appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action as frivolous. The claim that a constitutional violation

results when inmates in a higher classification status receive

greater privileges was rejected by this court in Mikeska v.
No. 97-40447

-2-

Collins, 900 F.2d 833, 837 (5th Cir. 1990), opinion withdrawn and

superseded on rehearing and reinstated in part by, 928 F.2d 126

(5th Cir. 1991). Appellant's race discrimination claim is

general and conclusory and without factual support; it is

therefore insufficient to sustain a § 1983 lawsuit. See

Whittington v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 818, 821 (5th Cir. 1988). The

district court did not err in dismissing the complaint as

frivolous. 

This appeal is frivolous and is therefore dismissed. We

caution King that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him

will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions,

King is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure

that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.
```

                                                                                                         EXHIBIT 32

                                   STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Quarterly Report") of Southern California Edison Company (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, based on his
knowledge, that:

        1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

        2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Alan J. Fohrer
                                                     ----------------------------------
                                                     Alan J. Fohrer
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Southern California Edison Company

                                                     /s/ W. James Scilacci
                                                     ----------------------------------
                                                     W. James Scilacci
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Southern California Edison Company

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```