alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A)
  1.
    
    I have read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SIFCO Industries, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b.
    
    paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 33-8545, 33-8760,
34-51293, 34-47986 and 34-54942;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;d.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  May 12, 2008
    /s/ Jeffrey P. GotschallJeffrey P. GotschallChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 1
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

# **Report of Management on Compliance**

# ** **

We,as members of management of Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (“COAF”), awholly owned subsidiary of Capital One Financial Corporation, are responsiblefor complying with the requirements of Sections 2.4(a), 2.4(b), 2.4(c), 3.7,3.8, 3.9(a), 3.11, 4.2, 4.3(a), 4.5, 4.6, and 10.2(e) of the Sale andServicing Agreement dated as of April 7, 2005 regarding the Capital One Auto Finance Trust, 2005-A Class A Notes(the “Agreement”), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon Form 8-K on April 12, 2005. We are also responsible forestablishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance withthe requirements referred to in the preceding sentence.

 

Anevaluation of COAF’s compliance with the requirements of Sections 2.4(a),2.4(b), 2.4(c), 3.7, 3.8, 3.9(a), 3.11, 4.2, 4.3(a), 4.5, 4.6, and 10.2(e) ofthe Agreement as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended has beenperformed under our supervision. Based on this evaluation, we assert that as ofand for the year ended December 31, 2005, COAF complied in all materialrespects with the requirements of these sections of the Agreement.

 

 
| Capital One Auto  Finance, Inc. | Capital One Auto  Finance, Inc. |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                 |   |   |
| By:                                  | /s/ David R.  Lawson                 |   | By: | /s/ Patrick C.  Gray |   |
| Name:                                | David R. Lawson                      | Name: | Patrick C. Gray |
| Title:                               | President                            | Title: | Assistant  Secretary (acting as |
|                                 | Chief Executive  Officer             |   | Interim Chief  Financial Officer) |
|                                      |                                      |  |  |  |  |

 

 

March 15, 2006

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25186]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IX District Advisory Council Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Hawaii District Advisory 
Council, will hold a public meeting at 10 a.m. on Wednesday October 11, 
2000 located at the Business Information and Counseling Center, 1111 
Bishop Street, Suite 204, Training Center, Honolulu, HI to discuss such 
matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, or others present. For further information 
write or call Andrew K. Poepoe, District Director U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 2-235, Honolulu, Hawaii 
(808) 541-2965.

Bettie Baca,
Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-25186 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I,   Douglas W. Child, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:  a. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  b. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Douglas W. Child Douglas W. Child, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  Dated March 30, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58596-58597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[RTCA Special Committee 186]


Automatic Dependent Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee (SC)-186 meeting to be held October 17-19, 2000, 
starting at 9 a.m. The meeting will be held at the Defence Evaluation 
Research Agency (DERA), Building B, St Andrews Road, Malvern, United 
Kingdom.
    The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) 
Review of Meeting Agenda; (3) Review and Approval of the Previous 
Meeting Minutes; (4) Review EUROCAE WG-51 Report: (a) SG-1, Automatic 
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B); (b) SG-2, Very High Frequency 
Data Link (VDL) Mode 4; (5) SC-186 Activity Reports for the following 
Working Groups (WG): (a) WG-1, Operations & Implementation; (b) WG-2, 
Traffic Information Services--Broadcast (TIS-B); (c) WG-3, 1090 MHz 
Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS); (d) WG-4, Application 
Technical Requirements; (6) VDL Mode 4 MOPS Status and Discussion; (7) 
MOPS for 1090 MHz Status and Discussion; (8) EMERATA Presentation 
(European Commission ADS-B Project); (9) Review/Approve: Application of 
Airborne Conflict Management: Detection, Prevention, & Resolution, RTCA 
Paper No. 294-00/SC186-172; (10) Review Revision to Terms of Reference 
for SC-186; (11) Review Process for Proposing Changes to DO-242: 
Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for ADS-B; (12) 
Review Action Items/Work Program; (13) DERA Demonstration (time 
permitted); (14) Other Business; (15) Date and Location of Next 
Meeting; (16) Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman,

[[Page 58597]]

members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. 
Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should 
contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, 
Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or 
the on-site contact, Sue Whitehead, at +44-1684-894792 (phone) or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37644252407756435419535245561950584119425c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b183e2e3c0b2a3f28652f2e392a652c243d653e20">[email protected]</span></a> (email). Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 22, 2000.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-25076 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4697 

To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Pyrasulfotole, 

Bromoxynil Octanoate, and Bromoxynil Heptanoate, including application 

adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Pyrasulfotole, Bromoxynil Octanoate, and 

Bromoxynil Heptanoate, including application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING 

4 PYRASULFOTOLE, BROMOXYNIL OCTANOATE, 

5 AND BROMOXYNIL HEPTANOATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4697 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Product mixtures containing 5-Hydroxy-1,3- 

dimethylpyrazol-4-yl 2- 

mesyl-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketone (Pyrasulfotole) (CAS 

No. 365400–11–9), 2,4- 

Dibromo-6-cyanophenyl octanoate (Bromoxynil Octanoate) (CAS No. 1689–99– 

2), and 2,4-Dibromo-6- 

cyanophenyl heptanoate 

(Bromoxynil Heptanoate) 

(CAS No. 56634–95–8), 

including application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 3808.93.15) ......... 1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
Quarterly Report), of Southern California Edison Company (the Company), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the
best of his knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 9, 2007



/s/    ALAN J.
FOHRERAlan J. Fohrer Chief Executive Officer Southern California Edison Company/s/    THOMAS M.
NOONANThomas M. Noonan Chief Financial Officer Southern California Edison Company


This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2042

MICHAEL BONNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-97-687-2)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Bonner, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn C. Carver, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Bonner appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his action seeking disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Bonner v. Apfel, No. CA-97-687-2 (E.D. Va. May 15, 1998). We note,

however, to the extent that Bonner alleges that his degenerative

disk disease has worsened since September 29, 1995, he must file a

new application for benefits. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.620(a)(2)

(1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SERVED: APRIL 5, 2016 U.S.DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION 

# :.f L OFFICE OF·HEARINGS . , .

**~!** 1

**-~** ,., WASHINGTON, DC : 1



### :::_;~ **1** "· J, IN THE MATTER OF VANAIR MAUFACTURING, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2016-4269 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### -8 II: 2q

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014-GL-70-0045) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe otherpersons on the attached Service List

Attachment-Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 . Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2W10001 

### ONE COPY JohnHoff, Respondent's Counsel Cremer, Spina, Shaughnessy, Jansen & Siegert, LLC One North Franklin Street, 1Oth Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Midwest Team Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60601 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2016-4269 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

d0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140915

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140915 COA: 290297 Oakland CC: 2008-223406-FC THOMAS HOWARD MCDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 25, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Rx Staffing, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaun M. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Shaun M. Jones

Shaun M. Jones

Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Gardner, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Gardner*([appeal No. 1] 167 AD2d 937 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, La Mendola, J. —criminal possession of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tonie Wiley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving the People the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence, we conclude that defendant’s guilt was proven to a moral certainty and that the circumstantial proof was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for murder in the second degree *(see, People v Betancourt,*68 NY2d 707, 709-710; *People v Marin,*65 NY2d 741, 742). The sentence imposed upon defendant was lawful and, in our view, was not harsh or excessive.

Defendant’s trial counsel failed to object to the witness’s in-court identification of defendant or to the court’s refusal to have the prosecutor’s opening statement reread to the jury. These remaining contentions were not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our discretionary power of review *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— murder, second degree.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

ROBIN BETHANY,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

OMNI AIR INTERNATIONAL,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00209-XR

ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT

On this day, the undersigned granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in 

this action and ordered service of Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, all matters referred to the 

Magistrate Judge have been considered and acted upon.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled and numbered case is 

RETURNED to the District Court for all purposes.

SIGNED this 5th day of March, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Note to Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPA

- 2006

- 0090

Meeting with American Petroleum Institute Representatives 4/15/2015; 1 hour

EPA staff participated in an Assis tant Administrator meeting with representatives from the American Petroleum Institute (API) to discuss issues related to the proposed amendments to Subpart J of t he National Contingency Plan.

API highlighted member concerns with certain aspects of the proposal, while expressing general support
for others. API stated that their drafted comment s lean heavily on the concept of “Net Environmental Benefits Assessment” (NEBA), and how it would be applicable to the response issues addressed in the proposal. Of particular concern for API members are also the toxicity threshold requirements for listing dispersant products on the Subpart J Product Schedule, and the desire for conducting independent based on the Agency’s reference oils.

API expressed concerns regarding the continued availability of dispersants as a “tool in the response toolkit.” The Ag ency reaffirmed it recog nize s dispersants as an option that should remain available for consideration when making environmental tradeoff decisions in emergency responses. API also expressed concerns that the proposed new monitoring requirements may pose ch allenges when attempting to balance those with a rapid response time. They argued that loosing time when considering dispersant application may result in spilled product traveling to areas where it could have greater i mpacts than in the water column; that managing the spill response is easier in the water
column than shoreline cleanup

. The Agency recognized the need for prompt response and the facilitation of this through proper pla n ning and preparedness. The Agency also pointed out that an
environmental tr adeoff analysis should not default on “fighting the battle in the water column as opposed to in the shoreline”, as there may be spill situations where the water column habitat would
need to take precedence. API also expressed concerns with how the proposed rule approaches the role
of the Federal On

- Scene Coordinator

.

API expressed support of the proposed provisions to update the effectiveness testing protocols for dispersants, and for acute toxicit y testing for dispersants alone . They als o recognized the importance of the Endangered Species Act consultation requirements to inform planning and response activities. API will be submitting comments to the public docket on this action.

API Participants: Khary Cauthen, Government Relations Raymond Bradley, Mids tream & Industry Operations

EPA Participants: Mathy Stanislaus Greg Wilson Barry Breen Leigh Dehaven Nitin Natarajan William Noggle Craig Matthiessen Becky Brooks Vanessa Principe