alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Bailey, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from his convictions for, *inter alia,*intentional and felony murder, defendant claims that the suppression court erred in not suppressing his oral and written confessions made to police officers. The suppression court found that defendant was not in custody *952when he made oral admissions without the benefit of *Miranda*warnings *(see, Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436). The resolution of factual issues by the suppression court should be honored unless unsupported as a matter of law *(see, People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, 588, *cert denied*400 US 851). Upon our review of the suppression hearing testimony, we conclude that the suppression court’s determination that defendant was not in custody is supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed.

Defendant’s sentence must be modified only to the extent that the sentence imposed on the robbery conviction must run concurrently with that imposed on the conviction for felony murder. We conclude, however, that it was within the court’s discretion to impose the sentence on the robbery conviction consecutively to the sentence on defendant’s conviction for intentional murder *(see, People v Adams,*163 AD2d 881).

We have examined the remaining issues raised by defendant and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J.—murder, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### Ex parte Floyd Jackson HUDSON.

No. 27998.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1955.

No appearance for appellant,

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. .

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought by relator Floyd Jackson Hudson seeking his release from the Texas Prison System.

*957Relator was convicted in the District Court of Midland County in Cause No. 1981 on the 2nd day of August, 1954, for the felony offense of attempt at burglary, and his punishment was assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

Article 1402, V.A.P.C., sets the punishment for this offense at not less than two nor more than four years. Relator, by certificate of the Texas Prison System, shows this Court that he has credit for time served in excess of two years, the minimum term set by the statute.

The sentence is excessive, and as to the excess over the two-year minimum is void. The relator has served the legal portion of the sentence and is entitled to be discharged. Ex parte Castleberry, Tex.Cr.App., 216 S.W.2d 584, and Ex parte Willis, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 333, 255 S.W.2d 510, and cases there cited.

It is so ordered.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5052 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5052

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain untwisted 
                            filament yarns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain untwisted 
                            filament yarns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNTWISTED FILAMENT YARNS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain untwisted filament 
yarns) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Pennsylvania Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4518 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4518

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of Azoxystrobin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of Azoxystrobin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF AZOXYSTROBIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.51 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain mixtures of 
Azoxystrobin) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3.1%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 717    | 1,418  | 1,062  | 1,376 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 458    | 1,651  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

DGG Group, LLC

vs.

Lockhart Fine Foods, LLC, Sinbad Foods,

LLC

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

AU:20-CV-00330-RP

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

STATUS CONFERENCE in Courtroom 4, on the Fifth Floor, United States Courthouse, 501

West Fifth Street, Austin, TX, on Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 10:00 AM. All parties and

counsel must appear at this hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2021.

______________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00330-RP Document 65 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 1
#### Fred HOGAN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 23986.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1948.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

L. E. King, County Atty., Sabine County of Hemphill, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of $50 fine and thirty days in jail on a charge of aggravated assault.

This is a companion case to Cause No. 23984, Clegg v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 210 S.W.2d 151 and presents exactly the same questions there discussed, to which reference is here made.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing

KRUEGER, Judge.

In his motion for a rehearing, appellant asserts that the same errors were committed in this case as in the case of Clegg v. State, No. 23984, 210 S.W.2d 151.

What we have said in our opinion in disposing of the motion for rehearing in the Clegg case disposes of the motion for a rehearing in this case.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4851 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4851

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
        hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized, reduced hydrolyzed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
        hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized, reduced hydrolyzed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPENE, 1,1,2,3,3,3-HEXAFLUORO-, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED, 
              REDUCED HYDROLYZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-, oxidized, polymerized, reduced hydrolyzed) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Glenn Miller Productions, Inc., Respondent, v Clement De Rosa, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about April 2, 1990, granting plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 6301 for a preliminary injunction, and denying defendant’s cross motion for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In 1989, a European promoter and the defendant, a former leader of plaintiff’s ensemble, discussed the possibility of the defendant’s leading an ensemble to be known as the "Glenn Miller Memorial Orchestra” on two 1990 tours of France. The plaintiff made its disapproval of any such plans known to the defendant and to the European promoter, on the grounds that plaintiff owns the exclusive United States’ right to the name "Glenn Miller Orchestra”, and that the two employment contracts between plaintiff and defendant prohibit the latter’s use of the name "Glenn Miller” in any capacity whatsoever. It is disputed whether the defendant withdrew from the French tour prior to the commencement of this action, in which the plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction and both liquidated and compensatory damages.

The motion for a preliminary injunction was properly granted. Plaintiff showed a likelihood of success on the merits, a substantial risk of irreparable injury, and a balance of the equities in its favor *(Primo Enters, v Bachner,*148 AD2d 350, 351).

The contract clauses at issue restrict only defendant’s use of the name "Glenn Miller” in his musical enterprises. They do not prohibit him from competing with the plaintiff, or from working as a musician or bandleader. For this reason, we do not find the contract clauses to be restrictive covenants. Were we to so characterize them, we would find them reasonable and enforceable *(see, Greenwich Mills v Barrie House Coffee Co.,*91 AD2d 398, 400-401).

*282Nor does plaintiff, by contract, attempt to extend its trademark to the "Glenn Miller” name into areas excluded from protection by the Federal trademark laws *(cf., Brulotte v Thys Co.,*379 US 29, *reh denied*379 US 985). The contract clauses are not an improper extension of a domestic trademark in a foreign market, since defendant does not have superior trademark rights in France *(see, Luft Co. v Zande Cosmetic Co.,*142 F2d 536, 540-541, *cert denied*323 US 756), nor is he a French national *(see, Majorica, S.A. v Majorca Intl.,*687 F Supp 92, 95). Further, the contractual provisions sought to be enforced are legitimately intended to avoid consumer confusion over the name "Glenn Miller” *(see, Scholastic, Inc. v Macmillan, Inc.,*650 F Supp 866). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Boston,                November 14, 2007                                     |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   | /S/                                                                          |   |   |
|   | Name:  Peter                J. Sonnabend                           |   |
|   | Title:  Chief                Executive Officer and Vice Chairman   |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   | /S/                                                                          |   |   |
|   | Name:  Stephanie                Sonnabend                          |   |
|   | Title:   Chief                Executive Officer and President |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   |                                                                         |   |   |
|   | /S/                                                                          |   |   |
|   | Name:   Boy                A. J. van Riel                     |   |
|   | Title:   Vice                President and Treasurer          |   |

----
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Devonshire
Resources Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ming Wong, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002that:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the*Securities Exchange Act of
        1934*, and                              
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Ming WongMing Wong, Chief Financial Officer

December 12, 2007

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3296]
 Allegany County and the contiguous counties of Garrett and Washington in Maryland; Hampshire, Mineral, and Morgan Counties in West Virginia; and Bedford, Fulton, and Somerset Counties in Pennsylvania constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by flooding that occurred on September 11, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on November 17, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on June 18, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Boulevard South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303. The interest rates are: 
                    ( print page 58141) PercentFor Physical Damage:HOMEOWNERS WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
7.375HOMEOWNERS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
3.687BUSINESSES WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
8.000BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
4.000OTHERS (INCLUDING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS) WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
6.750For Economic Injury:BUSINESSES AND SMALL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage are 329606 for Maryland, 329706 for West Virginia, and 329806 for Pennsylvania. For economic injury the numbers are 9I8500 for Maryland, 9I8600 for West Virginia, and 9I8700 for Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 18, 2000. Fred P. Hochberg, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. 00-24816 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P