alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4
                                                                     -----------


                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                               ------------------
                        IVC INDUSTRIES, INC. SAVINGS PLAN
                        ---------------------------------

     IVC Industries, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Delaware, having offices and its principal place of business at 500 Halls
Mill Road, Freehold, New Jersey, hereby adopts this Third Amendment to its
Savings Plan, effective January 1, 1998:

     1. Section 4.02, concerning allocations to Regular Accounts, shall be
amended for the first two sentences to read as follows:

         "The Company, as of the last day of each Plan Year for which the
Company shall have made a contribution, shall allocate such contribution to the
Participants in proportion to Annual Compensation. The Company may make such
contribution entirely in Company Stock, but any Company Stock in the Regular
Account of any Participant, provided it is not attributable to an Initial
Contribution, shall be liquidated to cash if it has an aggregate value of less
than $50.00."

     2. Section 4.05(b) shall be amended to read as follows:

         "(b) If during any Plan Year the Participant suffers a Break-In-Service
which prevents any post-Break-In-Service Years of Service for Vesting to be
combined with his pre-Break-In-Service Years of Service for Vesting with respect
to his pre-Break-In-Service Accrued Benefit, then as of the last day of such
Plan Year before the adjustments provided in Section 4.04 hereof, the Company
shall debit that terminated Participant's account by an amount equal to its
credit balance and such amount shall be utilized to reduce the amount of the
Matching Contribution otherwise required to be made to the Plan under Section
6.02(b), for the last quarter of the Plan Year, but if the amount of forfeitures
shall exceed the amount of such Matching Contributions, then all Company Stock
which may comprise such excess forfeiture

<PAGE>

amount shall be liquidated to cash, and such excess forfeiture shall be utilized
to pay expenses of the Plan."

     3. Section 5.15 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence:

         "Effective January 1, 1999, notwithstanding any other provision in this
Plan, all Regular Accounts with a value of under $50.00, provided they are not
attributable to an Initial Contribution, shall be 100% vested and subject to the
right of withdrawal of the full amount of the Account only on 30 days notice."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to
affix its corporate name hereto.


                                               IVC INDUSTRIES, INC.



                                               By: /s/ IVC INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                                  -------------------------



Dated:  December 30, 1998





                                       2
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00549-CR

WILLIE CLARKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 178th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1465671).

The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the 

court below on May 28, 2015. After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the 

opinion of this Court that there is no reversible error in the judgment. It is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the judgment of the court below be 

affirmed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 21, 2016.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices 

Keyes and Higley.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, et al., 

-vsGreg Abbott, et al. 

ORDER 

2U2flMR30 PM 2:140 

1 :2O-cv-00323-L 

Case No. 

BE IT REMEMBERED on this the..... day of 2(there 

was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by 

Elizabeth Murrill ("Applicant"), counsel for 

the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: 

State of Louisiana and 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant 

may appear on behalf of State of Louisiana in the above case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if Applicant has not already done so, shall, 

in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2), immediately tender the amount of $100.00, 

made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and 

Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall 

register as a filing user within 10 days of the date of this Order. 

IT IS FiNALLY ORDERED that Applicant's Pro Hac Vice status shall not become effective 

until Applicant has complied with all provisions of this Order. 

SIGNED this the\' day of 20 

UNI D STATES TRICT DGE 

Case 1:20-cv-00323-LY Document 42 Filed 03/30/20 Page 1 of 1
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45633

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

MICHAEL CHARLES BAKER ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: October 11, 2018
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz , District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and sentence and o rder relinquishing jurisdiction, affi r med

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM
Michael Charles Baker pleaded guilty to battery with intent to commit a serious felony, Idaho Code §§ 18

- 911, 18

- 915(1)(a), and 18

- 903 . The district court imposed a unified ten

- year sentence, with three years determinate . The district court retained jurisdiction, and Baker was sent to participate in the rider program. After Baker completed his rider, the district court relinquis hed jurisdiction. Baker appeals, claiming that the district court erred by re linquishing jurisdiction . He also argues his sentence is excessive and constitutes an abuse of discretion. We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or wheth er, instead, to relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district2 court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102 Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); Sta te v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

- 97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Baker has
failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.
Baker also contends that his sentence is excessive and constitutes an abuse of discretion. Sentences are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Our appellate standard o f review and the factors to be considered when evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well

- established.
State v. Burdett , 134 Idaho 271, 1 P.3d 299 (Ct. App. 2000); State v. Sanchez , 115 Idaho 776, 769 P.2d 1148 (Ct. App. 1989); State v. Reinke
, 103 Idaho 771, 653 P.2d 1183 (Ct. App. 1982);
State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (200 7). The record does not indicate that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing. The order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and Baker ’s sentence are
affirmed.
Mary Cato 

<mary.e.cato@gmail.com>

08/06/2010 04:37 PM

To CCG-ONG@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject comments on EPA oil & gas air reg review

I attended an EPA public meeting in Arlington, TX on 8/2/10, and had the following reactions:

1. the regulations should address more than individual pollutants/toxics separately, but their 

impact on people & the environment in combination

2. "energy independence" is becoming a meaningless term - it's my understanding that oil & 

natural gas are produced and sold on worldwide markets, not merely for consumption locally 

(e.g., Arlington/TX/US) - for this reason, I believe it's much more important to protect people & 

the environment around drilling/fracking production processes with strong, enforced regulations 

rather than promote the industry & its profit-driven practices based on a meaningless idea

3. I believe EPA should be more active in promoting development of new technologies that 

would be less toxic through RFPs & funding research, rather than passively relying on what's 

currently available within the industries that have little or no interest in anything other than 

producing the most oil/gas at the least cost to themselves - the recent Gulf oil and West Virginia 

coal mine disasters show what happens when industries are allowed to self-regulate - best 

"available" is not sufficient

Mary Cato

Arlington, TX
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4938 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4938

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of caprolactam 
disulfide with an elastomer binder of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer 
            and ethyl vinyl acetate, and dispersing agents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of caprolactam 
disulfide with an elastomer binder of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer 
            and ethyl vinyl acetate, and dispersing agents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF CAPROLACTAM DISULFIDE WITH AN ELASTOMER BINDER 
              OF ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE-DIENE MONOMER AND ETHYL VINYL 
              ACETATE, AND DISPERSING AGENTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.74 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of caprolactam 
disulfide with an elastomer binder of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer 
and ethyl vinyl acetate, and dispersing agents) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, Floyd E. Wicks, Chief Executive Officer of American States Water Company and
Southern California Water Company (the Registrant), do hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.                                                                                                                       

/s/ Floyd E. Wicks

Floyd E. Wicks
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2003
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02550**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02550\02550_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02550\02550_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02550\02550_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02550\02550_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02550\02550_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02550\02550_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02550\02550_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02550\02550_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02550\Certification Statement Plant ID 02550.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02550\Plant Allen Follow up Responses Final.docx Answers for Follow Up x 

### 02550\Questions 2550.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up x 

### 02550\Supplemental Documents\02550_ALLEN A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02550\Supplemental Documents\02550_Allen A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02550\Supplemental Documents\02550_Allen C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02550\Supplemental Documents\02550_Allen D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02550\Supplemental Documents\02550_D5-10 Allen FGD WWTS Description.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 198    | 589    | 526    | 202    | 214    | 98     | 437    | 648    | 77     | 186   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 197    | 302    | 242    | 116    | 160    | 27     | 111    | 119    | 160    | 606   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Kentucky Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Kentucky Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 64     | -66   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 67     | -20    | -4     | 6      | 55     | -126   | 7      | 68     | 16     | 14    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | -31    | 97     | -107   | -34    | 40     | 43     | -55    | 321    | -93    | 34    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -4     | 158    | -24    | 49     | -40    | 65     | -22    | 37     | 81     | 97    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -58    | -34    | -282   | 103    | -9     | -27    | -20    | 14     | 28     | -34   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -48    | 55     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-041:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>