alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41039 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DONACIANO AGUILAR-ALVAREZ, also known as Juan Valencia-Rios, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-02-CR-183-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donaciano Aguilar-Alvarez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Aguilar argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional.No. 02-41039 -2- Aguilar acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIFCO Industries, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 10, 2011



/s/ Michael S. LipscombMichael S. LipscombPresident and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by SIFCO
Industries, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that SIFCO Industries, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SIFCO Industries, Inc. and will be retained by SIFCO Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



21
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Nebraska Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Nebraska Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 4      | 1      | 2      | -1     | -6     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4891 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear for men. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear 

for men. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR FOR MEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4891 IH

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Work footwear for men 

with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, incorporating a protective toecap of materials other 

than metal, not covering 

the ankle (provided for in 

subheading 6403.99.60) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Israel Technology Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. March 29, 2007

          By:/s/ Israel FriederIsrael Frieder Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 29, 2007

          By:/s/ Glen ShearGlen Shear Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




---
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Giora Ben-Zeev, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Shamir Optical
Industry Ltd;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
     financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
     report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
     affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2005

                                                                  Giora Ben-Zeev
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                Member of the Board of Directors
#### DE DARDELBEN v. STATE.

No. 25043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

*142None on appeal for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is negligent homteide; the punishment, ninety days in jail.

No bills of exception or statement of facts appear in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          85,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,832
<INVENTORY>                                      3,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,466
<PP&E>                                         858,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 897,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,251
<BONDS>                                        531,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,620
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   897,203
<SALES>                                        151,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,553
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   581
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       502
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        


</TABLE>
#### DEGALLADO v. STATE.

No. 23384.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1946.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1946.

*354Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for an aggravated assault alleged to have been committed by the appellant oil the person of Ray Esparza. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of six months.

Appellant’s only complaint is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain -his conviction. With this contention we are unable to agree. The record reflects that on the night of the 7th day of September, 1945, Isaac Gusmann gave a party at his home located in the City of Austin, Texas, in honor of his son, who had just come home on a furlough from the Army. Appellant was not invited, but came to the party with some young lady who had been invited to it. About midnight on the occasion in question, some trouble arose among some of the young men including the appellant. . Gusmann requested appellant to leave, but instead of complying with the request, he went out to his automobile, took a pistol therefrom, returned to the home of Gusmann and attémpted to shoot him. Ray Esparza intervened and attempted to take the pistol from appellant. In the struggle over the possession of the pistol they fell to the ground. Appellant fired three shots, one of the bullets striking Esparza in the leg and inflicting a wound which required medical attention. He was taken to the hospital where he remained for a period of three weeks before he had sufficiently recovered to return to his home.

Appellant’s theory was that the other parties started a fight; that he had nothing to do with the same; that someone knocked him down, and got on top of him, at which time he fired the pistol in self-defense.

The court, in his charge, instructed the jury upon the law applicable to the theory of the State as well as that of the appellant, and no objections were urged to the court’s charge.

It will be noted that the evidence raised an issue of fact which the jury decided adversely to his contention; and this court would not be authorized to disturb their finding and conclusion upon an issue of fact, since they are the exclusive judges of the facts proven, the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony.

Believing that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, and finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 280   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 294    | 363    | 381    | 483    | 577    | 681    | 700    | 701    | 932    | 704   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 641    | 580    | 497    | 458    | 440    | 503    | 639    | 680    | 600    | 531   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 858    | 782    | 806    | 756    | 765    | 710    | 686    |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence Grazioso, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered August 10, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Texas Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Texas Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 2,584  | 2,705  | 2,974  | 2,960  | 2,901  | 2,964  | 2,822  | 2,617  | 2,563 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,575  | 2,493  | 2,402  | 2,469  | 2,414  | 2,524  | 2,606  | 2,687  | 2,544  | 2,584 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,819  | 2,653  | 2,711  | 2,517  | 2,801  | 3,080  | 3,335  | 3,658  | 3,560  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023