alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4664 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4664

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Cyclohexanedione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Cyclohexanedione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-CYCLOHEXANEDIONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,3-                Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Cyclohexanedione                                                  12/31/2015
                          (CAS No. 504-02-
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2914.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Army Research Laboratory, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, Washington, D.C.

These patents cover a wide variety of technical arts including: An apparatus for determining the thickness of a wall or coal seam and a traveling array antenna, which operates at microwave/millimeter frequencies.

Under the authority of section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or processes covered by this patent.

*Title:*                         High Performance Traveling Wave Antenna for Microwave and Millimeter Wave Applications.                    

*Inventors:*                         Thomas Koscica and Duc Huynh.                    

*Patent Number:*                         6,094,172.                    

*Issued Date:*                         July 25, 2000.                    

*Title:*                         Acoustic Navigation Aid for Autonomous Coal Miner.                    

*Inventors:*                         Donald E. Wortman and John D. Bruno.                    

*Patent Number:*                         6,094,986.                    

*Issued Date:*                         August 1, 2000.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norma Cammaratta, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-1197 tel: (301) 394-2952; fax: (301) 394-5818.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25069  Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### Ruth Cwick, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward W. Cwick, Deceased, Appellant, v Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court for new trial, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff’s intestate, a commercial diver, died on the bottom of Lake Ontario while doing underwater work on a sewer pipe. The pipe serviced a lakeshore sewage treatment plant designed by defendant Black & Veatch and built by the other defendants, referred to as "the Joint Venture”. The verdict in favor of the Joint Venture dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action for violation of the Jones Act *(see,*46 USC, Appendix § 688) must be reversed and a new trial granted because the court erred in its charge on proximate cause.

The court charged different theories of liability on the different causes of action, but rendered only one charge on proximate cause which was appropriate for common-law negligence, i.e., seaworthiness. The court did not charge the appropriate language for Jones Act liability. A plaintiff’s burden in proving causal negligence under the Jones Act is considerably less than that required to prove ordinary negligence. An employer will be held liable under the Jones Act if his "negligence played any part even the slightest, in producing the injury or death for which damages are sought” *(Rogers v Missouri Pac. R. R. Co.,*352 US 500, 506). Each party requested the court to charge that language but the court denied each request and charged that any negligent act is a proximate cause if a defendant’s conduct is a "substantial factor” in bringing about the harm *(see,*PJI 2:70). That charge is appropriate for ordinary negligence but not for Jones Act liability. The jury’s misapprehension of that central distinction most likely affected the verdict on the Jones Act cause of action because the foreman, in explaining the verdict, stated that although the jury found the Joint Venture negligent it did not find the negligence to be a “direct cause” of Mr. Cwick’s death. Accordingly, the court’s failure to explain the distinction between proximate cause for ordinary negligence and Jones Act liability denied plaintiff a fair trial against the Joint Venture and requires reversal and a new trial *(see, DeLima v Trinidad Corp.,*302 F2d 585, 587-588 [2d Cir]; *Runfola v Bryant,*127 AD2d 972; *cf., Farnarjian v American Export Isbrandtsen Lines,*474 F2d 361, 364 [2d Cir]). We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit. The verdict in favor of defendant Black *&**963Veatch is affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.—negligence.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
### In The Matter Of: EPA Bristol Bay Public Meeting - Dillingham August 14, 2014 Midnight Sun Court Reporters 511 W. 9th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 Ph. 907-258-7100 Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left. For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left. For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher (www.adobe.com).
EXHIBIT 4.37


**SHARE
      TRANSFER AGREEMENT**


**December
      25, 2006**





**Transferor/Party
      A: Yanjun Song**


**Transferee/Party
      B: Beijing Origin Seed Limited**





Party
      A
      agree to transfer his holdings of RMB 2,391,989 shares of Denong Zhengcheng
      Seed
      Limited (2.99% share of the registered capital of RMB 80,000,000), to Party
      B by
      a 1:1 ratio commencing from 21st December, 2006. Upon accepting Party
      A’s shares, Party B shall have relevant rights and obligations, shall not
      withdraw the foresaid fund in the operation of the company, and shall bear
      responsibility for breach of faith.





**Transferor/Party
      A: Yanjun Song**





**Transferee/Party
      B: Beijing Origin Seed Limited**
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Anthony M. Palma, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions based uponthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date:April 6, 2007 /s/ Anthony M. Palma     Anthony M. Palma  Chief Executive Officer
107
#### CADENA v. STATE.

No. 27014.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1954.

Martin & Shown, by W. E. Martin, Houston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*473WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for possessing a narcotic ; the punishment ten years in the penitentiary.

State Highway Patrolman M. R. Nugent testified that he clocked a speeding car in Gonzales County and stopped it.

Appellant was seated on the front seat with the driver and, when the driver got out, the officer observed that appellant was holding his hand down’ beside his leg, which aroused his suspicions. He asked appellant what he had in his hand and appellant said “Nothing, nothing.”

The officer told appellant to turn his hand over, and when appellant did so the officer saw that he had a “finger stall” fastened with a rubber band, which appellant handed over to him. The finger stall contained six capsules and two small packages, the substance in which proved to be heroin, a narcotic.

Appellant’s confession was offered in evidence in which he admitted the possession of heroin and said that he had caught a ride with the driver of the car.

By informal bill of exception the admissibility of the evidence as to the finding of the heroin is attacked, based upon the contention that the arrest and search of appellant was unlawful.

We need not here pass upon the interesting question as to whether the arrest of a speeding motorist will authorize a search of a passenger in the car, other than the driver.

In order to attack the legality of the arrest, it was incumbent upon appellant to show, by formal or informal bill of exception, that the arresting officer did not have a warrant authorizing such arrest or search. This was not done. See Pitcock v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 266 S.W.2d 389.

The evidence sustains the conviction and reversible error is not shown.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Texas--RRC District 8 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Texas--RRC District 8 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 10     | 4      | 13     | 0      | 35     | 1      | 10     | 32     | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 98     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### GUTHRIE v. STATE.

No. 25762.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1952.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### HUGHES v. STATE.

No. 26679.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of murder with malice, and his punishment was assessed at 35 years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains no sentence, in the absence of which this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 In connection with the annual report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: February 13, 2011
/s/ Sam Shlomo ElimelechSam Shlomo Elimelech, PresidentDated: February 13, 2011
/s/ Gai Mar-ChaimGai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer

(principal financial officer)