alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CURTIS v. STATE.

No. 23537.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1947.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 1947.

John Davenport, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted, as a second offender, of the crime of robbery by assault and his punishment assessed at imprisonment for life in the State penitentiary.

The record is before us without •a statement of the facts, in the absence of which we are unable to appraise the bill of exception presented.

No error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant insists that his Bill of Exception No. 1, being the only one, is understandable without the presence of a statement of facts. Possibly that may be correct. However, we find from the court’s qualification of the bill that appellant, during the trial of his case, became ill; that the trial was halted and a physician was summoned, who treated the appellant. The physician then informed the court that appellant had suffered an epileptic attack and that it would be three hours before he would be in a condition to proceed with the trial. Thereupon the judge adjourned court until the following morning at nine o’clock. When the court convened the following morning, appellant appeared therein and sat with his attorney until the arguments had been closed, apparently in as good a condition as he was prior to such attack. At no time was any testimony offered that he was not able to proceed with the trial on May 29, 1946. This attack took place at about 3:30 or 4:00 o’clock, P. M., on May 28, 1946, at which time the trial of this cause was *510passed until the next morning. A motion to declare a mistrial was filed after the conclusion of the testimony, whereupon the same was postponed until the following morning, and the failure of the trial court to grant such mistrial is the basis of this hill.

We see no error shown in said bill, and the motion will therefore be overruled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

[to be published]

# STATUS:

Closed meeting.

# PLACE:

450 Fifth Street NW., Washington, DC.

# DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED:

September 20, 2000.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

Cancellation of meeting.

The closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. has been cancelled.

Dated: September 26, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-25095  Filed 9-26-00; 4:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                                                 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|August 5, 2010 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date           |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
#### Donald STANLEY, movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 26, 1951.

P. H. Vincent, Ashland, for movant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of conviction for possession of alcoholic beverages for sale in local option territory and imposing a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for 30 days.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History:                                         
|                                                      
|No chart available.                                   
|No chart available.                                   
|                                                      
|                                                      
|Nebraska Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 8A Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 8A Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8      | 82     | 38     | 34    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 82     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-169766, 333-162222, 333-153672, 333-140066, and 333-126743 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-162221 on Form S-3 of our report dated September 15, 2011, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Diamond Foods, Inc., and the effectiveness of Diamond Foods, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diamond Foods, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2011.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

SanFrancisco, California 

September 15, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-131689 and Form S-3 No. 333-139833) of our reports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Spansion Inc., Spansion Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Spansion Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 26, 2007
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36     | 398    | 3,699  | 3,034 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,271  | 893    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000093397
<NAME> AMOCO CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             143
<SECURITIES>                                       769
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3315
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11
<INVENTORY>                                       1220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6354
<PP&E>                                           50663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   27994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5831
<BONDS>                                           5327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2542
<OTHER-SE>                                       13202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32274
<SALES>                                          13507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15564
<CGS>                                             9960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    933
<INCOME-TAX>                                       260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        


</TABLE>
#### PAGE v. STATE.

No. 23117.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1945.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1945.

J. K. Russell, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of burglary and his punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular and nothing is presented for the consideration of this Court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

On a former day of this term of court, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court because there were no bills of exception in the record nor a statement of facts accompanying the same. Since then appellant has filed a statement of facts and a bill of exception. By way of a motion for rehearing he requests that the same be considered, the judgment of affirmance be set aside and the cause be reversed and remanded. Article 760, Vernon’s Ann. C.C. P., provides that a statement of facts must be filed within ninety days, and a bill of exception within thirty days, from the date of the overruling of the motion for new trial and the giving of notice of appeal. The statement of facts in this instance was filed within the time prescribed by law but the bill of exception, which was filed on the same day, was not filed within due time, and no order of the court extending the time beyond the thirty-day period in which to file the same appears in the record. Therefore, the statement of facts will be considered in order to determine whether or not the evidence adduced upon the trial is sufficient to sustain his conviction, but the bill of exception cannot be considered.

The evidence adduced upon the trial, together with appellant’s voluntary confession, as the same appears in the record, is sufficient to sustain the conviction. Furthermore, appellant took the witness stand and testified, among other things, that he had not theretofore been convicted of a felony in this or any other state, but he did not deny the commission of the offense for which he was then on trial. On cross-examination he admitted that about four months prior thereto he was convicted for the theft of some millet; that he was also under indictment for burglary committed about ten days prior to the commission of this offense. Under the facts thus developed, the jury declined to recommend a suspension of the sentence.

*182We deem the evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. Therefore, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 4(d)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                       TO

         THE AMERUS LIFE HOLDINGS, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN


               As of September 20, 2000, the effective time of the merger
(the "Merger") of AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc., an Iowa corporation ("ALH"), with
and into AmerUs Group Co., an Iowa corporation (the "Company"), the Board of
Directors of the Company (the "Board"), on behalf of the Company, assumed,
approved and adopted the AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock
Plan (the "Plan").

               In connection with the assumption, approval and adoption of
the Plan, the Board has authorized and directed this Amendment No. 1 to the
Plan.

               Pursuant to the authorization and direction of the Board, the
Plan is hereby amended and supplemented effective September 20, 2000, as
follows:

               1.   The title of the Plan shall hereinafter be the
                    "AMERUS GROUP CO. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN."

               2.   The first paragraph of Section 1. of the Plan is hereby
                    amended and restated as follows:

         "The purpose of the AmerUs Group Co. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan
         (the "Plan") is to provide stock based compensation to eligible
         directors of AmerUs Group Co. (the "Company") in order to encourage the
         highest level of director performance and to promote long-term
         shareholder value by providing such directors with a proprietary
         interest in the Company's success and progress through grants of shares
         of the Company's Common Stock (the "Common Stock") which are restricted
         in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below
         ("Restricted Shares") and by granting them options to purchase shares
         of Common Stock ("Options")."

               3.   The following definitions as set forth under Section 2. of
                    the Plan are hereby amended and restated as follows:

                    "(d) "COMMON STOCK" means the Common Stock of the Company"

                    "(e) "COMPANY" means AmerUs Group Co., an Iowa corporation."

                    "(m) "PLAN" means the AmerUs Group Co. Non-Employee Director
                         Stock Plan."

               4.   Any reference in the Plan to "AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc."
                    shall be deemed a reference to "AmerUs Group Co."

               5.   Any currently outstanding and unexercised award or option
                    under the Plan which in any way relates to rights in or
                    rights to purchase common stock of or other equity interest
                    in ALH is hereby amended such that all such awards and
                    options shall relate to rights in or rights to purchase
                    common stock of or other equity interests, as the case may
                    be, in the Company.
#### CHOICE v. STATE.

No. 26193.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

t1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147844

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147844

COA: 314687

Ingham CC: 06

- 000160

- FC

MICHAEL LEE CASTILLO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).