Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 190 / Friday, September 29, 2000 / Notices 58511

Background

On June 26, 2000, the Department

published in the Federal Register (65

FR 39355) the Preliminary Results of the

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on industrial

phosphoric acid from Belgium for the

98–99 review period. We invited parties

to comment on our Preliminary Results

or review. We did not receive any

interested party comments on our

Preliminary Results.

We have now completed the

administrative review in accordance

with section 751 of the Act and

continue to find the dumping margin for

Prayon to be 0.60 percent.

Effective January 1, 2000, the

Department revoked the antidumping

duty order on industrial phosphoric

acid from Belgium, pursuant to section

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.222(i)(1). See Revocation of

Antidumping Duty Order: Industrial

Phosphoric Acid From Belgium; and

Revocation Countervailing Duty Order:

Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel,

65 FR 37115 (June 13, 2000). Therefore,

we will not issue cash deposit

instructions to the U.S. Customs Service

(‘‘Customs’’) based on the results of this

review. We have not received any

requests to conduct an administrative

review for the August 1999 through

December 1999 period, and the deadline

for such requests has passed. Since the

revocation is currently in effect, current

and future imports of industrial

phosphoric acid from Belgium shall be

entered into the United States without

regard to antidumping duties. We will

instruct Customs to liquidate imports

during the August 1999 through

December 1999 period as entered. We

have already instructed Customs to

liquidate all entries as of January 1,

2000 without regard to antidumping

duties. This is the notice of the final

results in the final review of this

antidumping duty order.

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this review

include shipments of IPA from Belgium.

This merchandise is currently

classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule (‘‘HTS’’) item numbers

2809.2000 and 4163.0000. The HTS

item numbers are provided for

convenience and Customs purposes.

The written description remains

dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

We did not receive any interested

party comments on our Preliminary

Results. Therefore, there is no Issues

and Decision Memorandum for the final

results of review.

Final Results of Review

We have determined that no changes

to our analysis are warranted for

purposes of these final results. As a

result of our review, we determine that

the following margin exists for the

period August 1, 1998, through July 31,

1999.

Exporter/manufacturer

Weightedaverage

margin percentage

Prayon ...................................... 0.60

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries. We

have calculated an importer-specific

duty assessment rate based on the ratio

of the total amount of antidumping

duties calculated for the importerspecific sales to the total entered value

of the same sales. The rate will be

assessed uniformly on all entries by that

particular importer made during the

POR. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

Customs.

This notice serves as a final reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a

certificate regarding the reimbursement

of antidumping duties prior to

liquidation of the relevant entries

during the review period. Failure to

comply with this requirement could

result in the Secretary’s presumption

that reimbursement of antidumping

duties occurred and the subsequent

assessment of doubled antidumping

duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of an APO is a

sanctionable violation.

We are issuing and publishing this

determination and notice in accordance

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the

Act.

Dated: September 22, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–25083 Filed 9–28–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–601]

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,

From the People’s Republic of China:

Extension of Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit

for final results of antidumping duty

administrative review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 29, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg

Campbell at (202) 482–2239, Office of

AD/CVD Enforcement I, Group I, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

Time Limits

Statutory Time Limits

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires

the Department to make a preliminary

determination within 245 days after the

last day of the anniversary month of an

order/finding for which a review is

requested and a final determination

within 120 days after the date on which

the preliminary determination is

published. However, if it is not

practicable to complete the review

within the time period, section

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the

Department to extend these deadlines to

a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,

respectively.

Background

On July 29, 1999, the Department

published a notice of initiation of

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on tapered

roller bearings and parts thereof,

finished and unfinished, from the

People’s Republic of China, covering the

period June 1, 1998 to May 31, 1999 (64

FR 41075). On June 29, 2000, we issued

the preliminary results of review (65 FR

41944). In our notice of preliminary

results, we stated our intention to issue

the final results of this review no later

than November 4, 2000.

Extension of Final Results of Review

We determine that due to the

numerous complex issues raised by

parties in this review, it is not

practicable to complete the final results

58512 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 190 / Friday, September 29, 2000 / Notices

of this review within the original time

limit. Therefore, the Department is

extending the time limits for completion

of the final results until no later than

January 3, 2001.

This extension is in accordance with

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Dated: September 22, 2000.

Richard W. Moreland,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import

Administration, Group I.

[FR Doc. 00–25081 Filed 9–28–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Export Trade Certificate of Review

AGENCY: International Trade

Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Initiation of Process to

Revoke Export Trade Certificate of

Review No. 86–00002.

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce

issued an export trade certificate of

review to National Association of Export

Companies, Inc. (‘‘NEXCO’’). Because

this certificate holder has failed to file

an annual report as required by law, the

Department is initiating proceedings to

revoke the certificate. This notice

summarizes the notification letter sent

to NEXCO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Morton Schnabel, Director, Office of

Export Trading Company Affairs,

International Trade Administration,

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free

number) or E-mail at oetca@ita.doc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of

the Export Trading Company Act of

1982 (‘‘the Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 4011–21)

authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to

issue export trade certificates of review.

The regulations implementing Title III

(‘‘the Regulations’’) are found at 15 CFR

part 325. Pursuant to this authority, a

certificate of review was issued on July

9, 1986 to NEXCO.

A certificate holder is required by law

(Section 308 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 4018)

to submit to the Department of

Commerce annual reports that update

financial and other information relating

to business activities covered by its

certificate. The annual report is due

within 45 days after the anniversary

date of the issuance of the certificate of

review (Sections 325.14(a) and (b) of the

Regulations). Failure to submit a

complete annual report may be the basis

for revocation. (Sections 325.10(a) and

325.14(c) of the Regulations).

The Department of Commerce sent to

NEXCO on June 29, 1999, a letter

containing annual report questions with

a reminder that its annual report was

due on August 23, 1999. Additional

reminders were sent on September 27,

1999, and on December 1, 1999. The

Department has received no written

response to any of these letters.

On September 25, 2000, and in

accordance with Section 325.10 (c)(1) of

the Regulations, a letter was sent by

certified mail to notify NEXCO that the

Department was formally initiating the

process to revoke its certificate. The

letter stated that this action is being

taken because of the certificate holder’s

failure to file an annual report.

In accordance with Section

325.10(c)(2) of the Regulations, each

certificate holder has thirty days from

the day after its receipt of the

notification letter in which to respond.

The certificate holder is deemed to have

received this letter as of the date on

which this notice is published in the

Federal Register. For good cause shown,

the Department of Commerce can, at its

discretion, grant a thirty-day extension

for a response.

If the certificate holder decides to

respond, it must specifically address the

Department’s statement in the

notification letter that it has failed to file

an annual report. It should state in

detail why the facts, conduct, or

circumstances described in the

notification letter are not true, or if they

are, why they do not warrant revoking

the certificate. If the certificate holder

does not respond within the specified

period, it will be considered an

admission of the statements contained

in the notification letter (Section

325.10(c)(2) of the Regulations).

If the answer demonstrates that the

material facts are in dispute, the

Department of Commerce and the

Department of Justice shall, upon

request, meet informally with the

certificate holder. Either Department

may require the certificate holder to

provide the documents or information

that are necessary to support its

contentions (Section 325.10(c)(3) of the

Regulations).

The Department shall publish a notice

in the Federal Register of the revocation

or modification or a decision not to

revoke or modify (Section 325.10(c)(4)

of the Regulations). If there is a

determination to revoke a certificate,

any person aggrieved by such final

decision may appeal to an appropriate

U.S. district court within 30 days from

the date on which the Department’s

final determination is published in the

Federal Register (Sections 325.10(c)(4)

and 325.11 of the Regulations).

Dated: September 25, 2000.

Morton Schnabel,

Director, Office of Export Trading Company

Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00–25012 Filed 9–28–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–U

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 092500E]

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management

Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery

Management Council will convene a

public meeting of the Law Enforcement

Advisory Panel (LEAP).

DATES: This meeting will be held on

October 18, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 12

noon.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at

the Adam’s Mark Clearwater Beach

Resort, 430 South Gulfview Boulevard,

Clearwater, FL 33767; telephone: 727–

443–5714.

Council address: Gulf of Mexico

Fishery Management Council, 3018 U.S.

Highway 301 North, Suite 1000, Tampa,

FL 33619.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Leard, Senior Fishery Biologist,

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management

Council; telephone: 813–228–2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The LEAP

will convene to discuss possible actions

to prohibit the sale of recreationally

caught fish and to review current state

and Federal marine enforcement

resources, capabilities, and needs. The

LEAP and the Gulf States Marine

Fisheries Commission’s (GSMFC) Law

Enforcement Committee (LEC), which

are made up of mostly the same

individuals, have been developing a 5-

year ‘‘Gulf of Mexico Cooperative Law

Enforcement Strategic Plan—2001–06.’’

This document contains a set of goals

and objectives that the LEAP/LEC

would like to accomplish during this 5-

year period. Once finalized, the 5-year

strategic plan will be submitted to the

GSMFC and the Council. The LEAP will

also review Draft Amendment 7 to the

Stone Crab Fishery Management Plan

(FMP) that includes options for a trap

certificate program in state and Federal

waters, and Draft Amendment 11 to the

Shrimp FMP that includes options for