alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153016, 333-141430, 333-138048, 333-136657, 333-126942, 333-126943 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-163716 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 22, 2012 , relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of ITC Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of ITC Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ITC Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2011 .


/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Detroit, Michigan


February 22, 2012
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Florence W. Vickery, Deceased. John P. Johnson, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Surrogate erred in permitting a lay witness to express her opinion concerning the mental competence of the testatrix. It is well established that an ordinary witness may describe the acts of a person whose sanity is in question and state whether those acts impressed her as rational or irrational, but that an ordinary witness, other than a subscribing witness to the will, may not render an opinion whether the testatrix was of sound mind *(see,*Richardson, Evidence § 364 [m] [Prince 10th ed]). That error does not, however, require reversal.

Evidence was offered that, during execution of the will, the testatrix did not speak, and that it was her son who asked the subscribing witnesses to act as witnesses. Petitioner, the proponent of the instrument, requested the court to instruct the jury that a testatrix need not declare an instrument to be her will or ask persons to act as subscribing witnesses; that a third person acting as the agent or representative of the testatrix may make the declaration and request the witnesses to attest *(see, Matter of Eckert,*93 Misc 2d 677, 679-680, *affd*70 AD2d 801). In the usual case, the attorney who prepared the will supervises its execution, and that circumstance is sufficient to permit an inference of agency or representation *(see, Matter of Hedges,*100 AD2d 586; *Matter of Eckert, supra).*No evidence was presented to establish how the instrument was prepared or that the son was acting as the agent of the testatrix. An attorney was not present during the ceremony, and the fact of agency could not be inferred from the circumstances. The jury’s special verdict, finding that testatrix did not declare the instrument to be her will and did not ask the subscribers to act as witnesses, was not contrary to the weight of evidence. Accordingly, the order removing petitioner as temporary executor is affirmed. (Appeal from order of Yates County Surrogate’s Court, DiPasquale, S.—probate.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
**Exhibit
      10.18**




**AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO**





**LICENSE
      AGREEMENT**





Amendment
      No. 1 to License (this “ **Amendment** ”)
      made as
      of August 2, 2006, by and between **Acuity
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.** ,
      a
      Delaware corporation, with its principal offices at 3701 Market Street,
      Philadelphia, PA, 19104 ( **“Acuity** ”)
      and **Pathogenics,
      Inc.** ,
      a
      Delaware Corporation with its principal offices at 99 Derby Street, Suite 200,
      Hingham, MA 02043 (“ **Pathogenics** ”).





**BACKGROUND**





WHEREAS,
      Acuity and Pathogenics entered into a License Agreement (the “ **License
      Agreement** ”)
      on
      April 13, 2006;





WHEREAS,
      Section 3.2(d)(i) of the License Agreement provided for a payment by Acuity
      of
      up to $75,000 to be used the Institute of Hygiene and Social Medicine,
      Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Austria and or the Phase II clinical
      investigators to be used to accelerate recruitment into a Phase II clinical
      trial;





WHEREAS,
      Pathogenics has requested that Acuity make available $3,830 to Pathogenics
      to be
      used to fund activities to accelerate recruitment into a Phase I clinical trial;
      and





WHEREAS,
      Acuity has agreed to fund the $3,830 provided that it be credited against the
      $75,000 referenced in Section 3.2(d)(i) of the License Agreement.





NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, agreements,
      representations and warranties hereinafter set forth, and intending to be
      legally bound, the Parties hereby agree as follows:





1. Acuity
      hereby agrees to pay $3,830 to Pathogenics to be used to fund activities to
      accelerate recruitment into a Phase I clinical trial.





2. Pathogenics
      hereby agrees that the $3,830 shall be credited against the $75,000 referenced
      in Section 3.2(d)(i) of the License Agreement.





(Signature
      Page Follows)





**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized
      representatives as of the day and year first indicated above.





**ACUITY
                PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**By:
            /s/
                Dale R. PfostName:
                Dale R. PfostTitle:
                President and Chief Executive Officer**PATHOGENICS,
                INC.**By:
            /s/
                Frederic P. ZotosName:
                Frederic P. ZotosTitle:
                President and Chief Executive Officer
#### R. H. KEYWORTH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 24763.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 8, 1950.

No attorney for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Criminal Dist., Atty., Houston, E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction was for violation of the statute prohibiting bookmaking. 652a, Vernon’s P.C. The penalty was assessed at a fine of $1,000.

The appellant moves to withdraw his appeal and has filed his personal affidavit supporting the motion.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### FREEMAN v. STATE.

No. 26938.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 7, 1954.

*378No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 302 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen E. Tremblay, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc., as amended (this report); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 8, 2012



By:

/S/    STEPHEN E.
TREMBLAYStephen E. TremblayChief Financial Officer
|     |                                                                                                                            |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|      |                                                                                                                                                      |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Dated: | November 28, 2012 |   |
|   | By: | /s/ MICHAEL SHAFFER |
|   | Name: | Michael ShafferExecutive Vice President andChief Operating & Financial Officer |
TO: Department of Transportation (DOT) 

I am just going to make this simple. I nominate 

Mokulele airlines to do the kalaupapa flights. They 

just have better customer service, and the planes are 

much cleaner and convenient for me and other 

people. They is like family.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent 
Systems (1200).
    Date and Time: October 16-17, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 390, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Ephraim Glinert, Deputy division Director, 
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 292-8930.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Robotics and Human Augmentation 
Career proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25192 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4992 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4992

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                               for women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Ms. Bonamici introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain leathered footwear 
                               for women.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Footwear for        Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          women, with                                                       12/31/2015
                          uppers of leather
                          other than of
                          pigskin (other
                          than work
                          footwear, tennis
                          shoes, basketball
                          shoes, gym shoes,
                          training shoes
                          and the like, and
                          other than slip-
                          on footwear),
                          covering the
                          ankle, valued $27/
                          pair or higher,
                          designed to be
                          worn in lieu of,
                          but not over,
                          other footwear as
                          a protection
                          against water,
                          oil, grease or
                          chemicals or cold
                          or inclement
                          weather where
                          such protection
                          includes
                          protection
                          against water
                          that is imparted
                          by the use of a
                          coated or
                          laminated textile
                          fabric (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6403.91.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4942 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene polymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene 

polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE POLYMER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ethylene-Propylene polymer 

(CAS No. 9010–79–1) (provided for in subheading 

3902.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4942 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
J.

appellant that failure to demonstrate jurisdiction could result in the dismissal of this appeal.

To date, appellant has not responded to our show cause order or otherwise demonstrated that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

e-ea , a; ,J. Hardesty_

o m 

# ga r it% J. Douglas

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge David Lee Phillips & Associates Sean Claggett & Associates, Inc. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Siboney Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Timothy J. Tegeler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The
 information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Timothy J. Tegeler
Timothy J. Tegeler
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
OfficerAugust 16, 2004


20
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|New Mexico--East Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|New Mexico--East Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 5      | 38     | 67     | 297    | 520    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

          - 29 CFR Part 2200

# AGENCY:

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; elimination of expiration date.

# SUMMARY:

On February 19, 1999 the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission issued a final rule amending its rules of procedure to add a new Subpart H to part 2200 consisting of § 2200.120 64 FR 8243. In that section the Commission established a mandatory settlement process known as the Settlement Part as a pilot program for a one-year trial period.

In order to more effectively evaluate the Settlement Part the Commission, on February 15, 2000, extended the pilot program through September 30, 2000. 65 FR 7434. While the evaluation was based on limited data, it showed generally positive results, including substantial satisfaction among the program's users. Accordingly, the Commission has determined to eliminate the expiration date and make the Settlement Part a permanent part of its Rules of Procedure. The Chairman will continue to monitor the program and to assess its effectiveness.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

As of September 29, 2000 the expiration date for Subpart H consisting of § 2200.120 is removed and the subpart becomes a permanent part of 29 CFR part 2200.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General Counsel, One Lafayette Centre, 1120 20th St., NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3419, phone (202) 606-5410.

Dated: September 26, 2000.

Thomasina V. Rogers,

Chairman.

Gary L. Visscher,

Commissioner.

Stuart E. Weisberg,

Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 00-25138  Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7600-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

CYWEE GROUP LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

V. GOOGLELLC, 

Defendant. 

ORE EENSION OF DE. 

CASE NO. 6:20-cv-00128-ADA-JCM 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Before the Court is the parties Joint Stipulation Regarding Extention of 

Deadlines for Briefing on Defendant Google LLC's Motion to Dismiss. The Stipulation 

is GRANTED. The deadlines to file a Response and a Reply to Google's Motion to 

Dismiss (Dkt. No. 11) are extended by seven (7) days. Specifically, CyWee's Response 

will now be due on June 8, 2020. Google's Reply will now be due on July 6, 2020 

Signed this I day of 2020. 

Hon. Jeffrey C. Manske 

United States Magistrate Judge 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF DEADLINES FOR 

BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC's MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE 1 

Case 6:20-cv-00128-ADA-JCM Document 22 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4927 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men’s 

footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. HARRIS (for himself and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain men’s footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.76 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain men’s footwear with outer soles and uppers of rub7 bers or plastics) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$20/pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$24/ 

9 pair’’; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4927 IH

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS