alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN EUGENE NAGLE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 391 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN EUGENE NAGLE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 392 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

          I, David A. Spector, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust Resecuritization
          2005-12R;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
          included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee
          in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or
          similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
          master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
          agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

          Date: March 29, 2006

                                       /s/ David A. Spector
                                       --------------------
                                       David A. Spector
                                       Senior Managing Director
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - West Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 276    | 117    | 933    | 461    | 443    | 474    | 6,286  | 297    | 202    | 145   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 866    | 1      | 235    | 0      | 718    | 93     | 4,304  | 557    | 138   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 965    | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 25741.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 12, 1952.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area with the penalty assessed at a fine of $200.

In as much as the record brought forward contains neither a statement of facts nor -bill of exception, nothing is presented for review. All proceedings appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 190    | 563    | 493    | 191    | 201    | 92     | 407    | 606    | 73     | 174   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 184    | 274    | 214    | 103    | 142    | 24     | 98     | 105    | 143    | 536   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,267 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,425  | 10,263 | 14,749 | 6,669  | 5,029  | 15,084 | 9,610  | 3,573  | 7,609  | 19,853
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18,371 | 8,689  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
Plaintiff, §
v. § CASE NO. 3:20-cr-00389-DCG
PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS §
Defendant. §

WAIVER OF DEFENDANT’S PRESENCE AT
OCTOBER 19, 2020 JOINT STATUS HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DAVID C. GUADERRAMA:

COMES NOW Defendant in the above-referenced case who, along with his undersigned
attorney, hereby acknowledges the following:

1. The defendant understands he has the right to appear personally with his attorney before
the Judge for the Joint Status hearing set on October 19, 2020. Defendant further
understands that absent the present waiver he will be required to appear in open Court.

2. Defendant, having conferred with his attorney in this regard, hereby waives personal
appearance with his attorney at this case’s joint status hearing.

Date: 7o Ih 9/20 — Pak GQ
Defendant

Quite

Attorney fof Defendant

ORDER
APPROVED by this Court. Defendant’s presence is hereby waived for

Date:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE GUADERRAMA
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company

Via UPS

February 23, 2006
Karen Schluter
Citibank, NA
11l Wall Street, l4th Floor/Zone 3
New York, NY 10005

RE:SASCO 2005-5
Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Schluter:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending on
December 31, 2005:

1.     I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master Servicer
during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the Trust Agreements
and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or obligations under the
Agreements;

2.     Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms of the
Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default in the
fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or failure and
the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.     To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.     To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of
its obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.     The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by the
Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts to
obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:

/s/ R. Peter Karr
------------------
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Edgen Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel J. O'Leary, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



March 31,
2006

|By: |  | /s/DANIEL J. O'LEARYDaniel J. O'Leary President and Chief Executive
Officer |  | 
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

VICTOIRE VAN DER PAS, 

Plaintiff

v.

ASSURAVEST, LLC, HUGHES

PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC,

GREG HUGHES, and STEVEN R.

SIXBERRY,

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

Case No. 1:20-CV-235-SH

FINAL JUDGMENT

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed October 22, 2021 

(Dkt. 42). The parties have entered into an agreement to settle this lawsuit. As part of their 

agreement, Plaintiff Victoire Van Der Pas agreed to dismiss her claims against Defendants 

Assuravest, LLC, Hughes Private Capital, LLC, Greg Hughes, and Steven R. Sixberry in two 

stages. On October 21, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss her non-contract 

claims with prejudice. Dkt. 41. In this Motion, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss her remaining claims 

with prejudice.

The Court HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Dkt. 42) and 

DIMISSSES WITH PREJUDICE all causes of action that have been asserted or could have been 

asserted in this lawsuit. All costs are taxed against the party incurring same. The Court FURTHER 

ORDERS that all court settings are cancelled, any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, 

and that the Clerk of Court CLOSE this case. 

SIGNED on October 22, 2021.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00235-SH Document 43 Filed 10/22/21 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 179   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 533    | 42     | -483   | 378    | 243    | -6     | -1,079 | -191   | 320    | 30    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 142    | -283   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 664    | 141    | 176    | 268    | 476    | 708    | 359    | 240    | 204    | 252   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 469    | 286    | 122    | 314    | 57     | 302    | 99     | 2,336  | 109    | 164   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 117    | 2,158  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 59215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25400]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management; Renewal

    The NSF management official having responsibility for the U.S. 
National Assessment Synthesis Team (#5219) has determined that renewing 
through October 31, 2000, is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, 
National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 USC 1861 et seq. This 
determination follows consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Authority for this Committee will expire on October 31, 2000. For 
more information, please contact Karen York, NSF, at (703) 292-4387.

    Dated: September 28, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25400 Filed 10-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M