alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ECHOLS v. STATE.

No. 26728.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1953.

Hollis Massey, Columbus, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $250.

George Vogt testified that on April 10,. 1953, he saw a man driving a Cadillac au*439tomobile in an unusual manner upon U. S. Highway 90 between Weimar and Columbus in Colorado County, Texas, and took the license number of the automobile; that he followed the automobile into Columbus and notified the sheriff of what he had seen and gave him the license number of said automobile.

D. L. Wilson, Highway Patrolman, testified that he was one mile east of Columbus in Jack Hill’s Cafe about 40 feet from U. S. Highway 90 around 9 P.M. on April 10, 1953; that he heard a crash — looked out the window and saw appellant “back” his car 5 or 6 feet, turn the lights of the car off, and step out of the automobile, which was a Cadillac; that he went to appellant’s car and found that it had damaged another automobile; that the only persons in appellant’s car were his wife and a small son, who were in the back seat. He further testified that he found a bottle on the front floor-board with some whiskey in it; that he could smell whiskey on appellant’s breath; that he observed his speech and actions; that in his opinion appellant was under the influence of intoxicating, liquor.

Sheriff Walker testified that on April 10, 1953, he received a report as to the operation of a Cadillac automobile on U. S. Highway 90 and was given the license number of the same; that upon investigation, he found a car bearing this license number at Jack Hill’s Cafe; that he saw appellant at the cafe and observed his speech and actions and, in his opinion, he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Appellant did not testify and offered no evidence.

The record is replete with evidence showing the intoxication of the appellant.

The court, among other instructions, charged the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to show that he was driving an automobile upon a public highway at the time and place in question.

We conclude that the facts and circumstances in evidence are sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 580   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,044  | 3,005  | 200    | 1,092  | 800    | 317    | 799    | 1,146  | 205    | 301   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 749    | 2,355  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### CUMMINS v. STATE.

No. 25553.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the .State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was charged with the offense of passing a forged instrument and entered his plea of guilty. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings appear to he regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 99.12**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-170295 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statements No. 333-185723, 333-190801 and 333-193876 on Form F-10 and to the use of our reports dated February 19, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements of HudBay Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 
| /s/ Deloitte LLP                                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   |
|                                                        |   |
| Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered   Accountants |   |
| Licensed Public Accountants                                 |   |
|                                                        |   |
| Toronto, Canada                                             |   |
| March 31, 2014                                         |   |

 

----
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 171    | 140    | 171   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 158    | 194    | 259    | 178    | 215    | 194    | 274    | 147    | 123    | 446   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 313    | 191    | 385    | 225    | 342    | 386    | 953    | 510    | 300    | 479   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 350    | 220    | 350    | 180    | 647    | 381    | 1,020  | 221    | 498    | 403   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 166    | 240    | 475    | 521    | 218    | 1,589  | 308    | 166    | 124    | 129   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 102    | 41     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Order entered September 29 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00432 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF FRI LEY S. DAVIDSON, DEC EASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 09 - 3999 - 1



### O RDER We GRANT the September 24, 2015 motion of Jacqueline Galindo, Official Court Reporter for the Probate Court No. 1, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by OCTOBER 26, 2015
. /s/ ELIZABETH LA NG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT  99.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-QSBA of
Standard  Capital  Corporation (the "Company") for the six months ended February
28,  2003,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  I,  E.  Del  Thachuk,  Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


1.    The  Quarterly  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The  information  contained  in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




Date:  April 19, 2004

                                 /s/  "E.  Del  Thachuk"
                                 -----------------------
                                   E.  Del  Thachuk
                              Chief  Executive  Officer,
                               President  and  Director
YVELAN PIERRE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5902

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

.

Yvelan Pierre , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4996 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4996

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on quinoline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on quinoline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUINOLINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to quinoline) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ernest L. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27252.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM. :

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $50.

*430■ The record is before us without, a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All: the proceedings appearing regular and-nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the-trial court is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4684 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUOPYRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-{2-[3-Chloro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-2- 

pyridinyl]ethyl}- 

alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoroo-toluamide (Fluopyram) 

(CAS No. 658066–35–4) 

(provided for in subheading 2933.39.21) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4684 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5078 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acephate formulation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acephate formulation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACEPHATE FORMULATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-[methoxy (methylthio) 

phosphinoyl]acetamide 

(CAS No. 30560–19–1) 

formulation (provided for 

in subheading 3808.91.50) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5078 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
PANAGRA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                                             1 World Trade Center, 85th Floor
                                                    New York, NY 10048




June 1, 2001


Ronald C.H. Lui
PanAgra International Corporation
1 World Trade Center, 85th Floor
New York, NY  10048

Re:      Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreements

Dear Mr. Lui:

         This Letter Agreement (the  "Agreement") will confirm our understanding
that the option vesting schedule of your incentive stock option agreement, dated
April 5, 2001 and your nonqualified  option agreement,  dated April 5, 2001 with
the  Company  (collectively  referred to as the  "Option  Agreements")  shall be
amended as follows:

         20% of the shares underlying the option vest on the first day of the
         sixth month following April 5, 2001 (the "Execution Date"), an
         additional 20% of the shares underlying the option shall vest on the
         first anniversary after the Execution Date and 2.50% of the shares
         underlying the option shall vest on the first day of each month
         following the first anniversary of the Execution Date.

         Except as  modified  by this  Agreement,  all of the other terms of the
Option Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of New York without
regard  to the  conflicts  of law  principles  thereof.  This  Agreement  may be
executed  in any  number  of  counterparts,  each of which  shall be  deemed  an
original  and   enforceable   against  the  parties   actually   executing  such
counterpart,  and all of  which,  when  taken  together,  shall  constitute  one
instrument.  To the extent amended by this Agreement,  this Agreement supersedes
the Option  Agreements.  Facsimile  execution and delivery of this  Agreement is
legal, valid and binding execution and delivery for all purposes.





<PAGE>



         If the above meets with your understanding, please acknowledge your
agreement by signing below. This Agreement is deemed to be executed by the
parties hereto as of the date first above written.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        PANAGRA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/ Ronald C. H. Lui
                                           ----------------------
                                           Name:  Ronald C.H. Lui
                                           Title: President



ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
AS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER
AGREEMENT AS FIRST SET FORTH ABOVE

/s/ Ronald C. H. Lui
-----------------------------
Ronald C.H. Lui
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00509

- CR

Terrance RAMSEY

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5401

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1

.

SIGNED December 16, 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA Document 13 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA Document 13 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA Document 13 Filed 03/24/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA Document 13 Filed 03/24/20 Page 4 of 4
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DOUGLAS H. KEEVIS, )

a/k/a DOUGLAS HENRY KEEVIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3824

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5085 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OXYFLUORFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4- 

nitrophenoxy)-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)benzene 

(Oxyfluorfen) (CAS No. 

42874–03–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2909.30.30) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5085 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5006 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DEPCT. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DEPCT. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEPCT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.58 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 DEPCT) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

7 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 190 (Friday, September 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25135]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  10 a.m. (EDT) October 10, 2000.

Place:  4th Floor, Conference Room 4506, 1250 H Street NW., Washington, 
DC.

Status:  Open.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Approval of the minutes of the September 11, 2000, Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

Contact Person for more information:  Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: September 26, 2000.
Elizabeth S. Woodruff,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 00-25135 Filed 9-26-00; 4:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-M