alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|California - San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 77    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 81     | 57     | 124    | 117    | 105    | 120    | 109    | 107    | 101    | 95    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 86     | 75     | 83     | 85     | 75     | 80     | 80     | 82     | 58     | 60    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 64     | 52     | 68     | 78     | 95     | 112    | 100    | 103    | 97     |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5083 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5083

  To extend the suspension of duty on macroporous ion-exchange resin 
  comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, 
                         thiol functionalized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the suspension of duty on macroporous ion-exchange resin 
  comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, 
                         thiol functionalized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS ION-EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A COPOLYMER OF 
              STYRENE CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, THIOL 
              FUNCTIONALIZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to macroporous ion-exchange 
resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 
divinylbenzene, thiol functionalized) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Federal Chandros, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Silverite Construction Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.), entered on July 17, 1989, which granted a motion by defendant Silverite Construction Company to dismiss the complaint, granted a motion by defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland for reargument of a prior cross motion to dismiss the complaint and, on reargument, granted the motion, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for reargument of a prior motion by Silverite, and ordered the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking the sum of $42,000 for performance of electrical work in connection with construction, renovations and improvements performed on the Long Island Railroad Hillside Support Facility, in which defendant Silverite was party to the contract, and in which defendant Fidelity issued a bond guaranteeing Silverite’s payment under the contract. The plaintiffs have offered, as a deposition witness, a principal of plaintiff Federal Chandros. This witness has refused to answer any substantive questions on the asser*316tion of his privilege pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, and the plaintiffs have not offered any other knowledgeable witness. After several attempts to accommodate the plaintiffs, the IAS court dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to provide disclosure.

The complaint was properly dismissed. As the IAS court noted, a party may not use a Fifth Amendment privilege as a shield to resist discovery while simultaneously pressing claims against the party seeking discovery *(Steinbrecher v Wapnick,*24 NY2d 354; *Laverne v Incorporated Vil. of Laurel Hollow,*18 NY2d 635, *appeal dismissed*386 US 682). This prohibition applies with equal force where the privilege is asserted by the principal of a corporate plaintiff *(see, e.g., Dyno-Bite, Inc. v Travelers Cos.,*80 AD2d 471, *appeal dismissed*54 NY2d 1027). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5101 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5101

  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors of an 
output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 W designed to be operated 
                by means of an infrared remote control.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain AC electric motors of an 
output exceeding 37.5 W but not exceeding 72 W designed to be operated 
                by means of an infrared remote control.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEEDING 37.5 W BUT 
              NOT EXCEEDING 72 W DESIGNED TO BE OPERATED BY MEANS OF AN 
              INFRARED REMOTE CONTROL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        AC electric motors  1%              No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          of an output                                                      12/31/2015
                          exceeding 37.5 W
                          but not exceeding
                          72 W, single
                          phase, each
                          equipped with a
                          capacitor, a
                          motor mount of
                          plastics, a self-
                          contained gear
                          mechanism for
                          oscillation, and
                          a speed control
                          mechanism
                          designed to be
                          operated by means
                          of an infrared
                          remote control
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8501.40.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Dates:*                         October 30, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 AM to 4:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Edward W. Schroder, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2156, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 21, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-25156 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HARDIE v. STATE.

No. 26829.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*437DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The information contains two separate accusations of aggravated assault upon the same person. The first is alleged to have been committed upon the 2nd day of September, 1953, and the other, on the 8th day of September, 1953.

Both counts were submitted to the jury, who acquitted appellant of the first accusation and found him guilty of the second, fixing his punishment at a fine of $500 and ninety days in jail.

It was the province of the state to prosecute for separate misdemeanors under the same information.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CR-00389-DCG

ORDER RESETTING SENTENCING HEARING

The Court previously scheduled a sentencing hearing in this case for June 30, 2023. See 

Order Setting Sentencing, ECF No. 272. The Government and Defendant Patrick Wood Crusius 

have now jointly moved to reset sentencing in order to lessen logistical burdens and to allow the 

greatest number of people to attend the entire proceedings. See Joint Mot. Continue Sentencing, 

ECF No. 273. Finding the parties’ request appropriate, the Court GRANTS the parties’ “Joint 

Motion to Continue Sentencing” (ECF No. 273) and MODIFIES the sentencing hearing

schedule as follows:

This case is set for a SENTENCING HEARING beginning on July 5, 2023 at 9:00 

a.m. Mountain Time in Courtroom Number 812 on the Eighth Floor of the United States 

Courthouse, 525 Magoffin Avenue, El Paso, Texas.

The Sentencing Hearing will proceed under the following schedule:

Portion of the Sentencing Proceeding Date and Time

1. Discuss the Presentence Report and hear 

and resolve objections to the Report;

Defense Counsel’s and Defendant Patrick 

Wood Crusius’s allocution

July 5, 2023, beginning at 9:00 a.m.

2. Victim impact statements July 5, 2023, beginning at 1:00 p.m. and 

proceeding until finished. The Court expects 

this portion of the hearing to take 

approximately two days.

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 274 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

3. The Government’s allocution and the 

Court’s pronouncement of Defendant’s 

sentence

10:00 a.m. on the day immediately following 

the last victim impact statement (unless that 

last victim impact statement is given on 

Friday, in which case this portion of the 

sentencing will begin at 10:00 the following 

Monday)

While each portion of the proceeding will take place in Courtroom Number 812, the 

Court will provide overflow capacity in a designated space in the Courthouse.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of June 2023.

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 274 Filed 06/20/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4881 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4881

To extend the suspension of duty on an ion exchange resin comprising a 
  copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, iminodiacetic 
                           acid, sodium form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the suspension of duty on an ion exchange resin comprising a 
  copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, iminodiacetic 
                           acid, sodium form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A COPOLYMER OF STYRENE 
              CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, IMINODIACETIC ACID, 
              SODIUM FORM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to an ion exchange resin 
comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, 
iminodiacetic acid, sodium form) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5030 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5030

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear covering 
                               the ankle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

  Mrs. Capps introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear covering 
                               the ankle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE ANKLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Women's footwear    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          with uppers of                                                    12/31/2015
                          furskin, valued
                          over $30/pair,
                          covering the
                          ankle (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6405.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### ADAMS v. STATE.

No. 24569.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was assessed a punishment of two years in the penitentiary for cattle theft.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

WANDA WALDON,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

BEXAR COUNTY CRIMINAL 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

SA-20-CV-00268-XR

ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT

On this day, the undersigned issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that 

the Court dismiss this case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, all matters referred to the 

Magistrate Judge have been considered and acted upon.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled and numbered case is 

RETURNED to the District Court for all purposes.

SIGNED this 17th day of August, 2020.

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00268-XR Document 20 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 1
August 25, 2021

JUDY D. LIEBERMAN §

Plaintiff §

V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-20-CV-0180-OLG

§

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. §

Defendant §

Dear Counsel, 

I have been made aware by Chief Judge Orlando Garcia that he presided over the above-mentioned case, and 

owned stock in the defendant’s company in a sum not greater than $10,000.00. However, his ownership of this stock 

neither affected nor impacted his decisions in the case. Had he known of his stock ownership at the time the case 

was assigned to him, he would have recused himself or divested his ownership of the stock as required by the Code 

of Conduct for U.S. Judges. Included below are the Committee on Code of Conduct Advisory Opinion Number 71 and 

69.

Advisory Opinion 71 provides the following guidance for addressing disqualification that is not discovered 

until after a judge has participated in a case:

“A judge should disclose to the parties the facts bearing on disqualification as soon as those facts are learned, 

even though that may occur after entry of the decision, the parties may then determine what relief they may seek and 

a court (without the disqualified judge) will decide the legal consequence, if any, arising from the participation of the 

disqualified judge in the entered decision.”

Although Advisory Opinion 71 contemplated disqualification after a Court of Appeals oral argument, the 

Committee further explained similar considerations would apply when a judgement was entered in a district court by 

a judge, and it is later learned that the judge was disqualified. On the other hand, in part, Advisory Opinion 69 

provides:

“Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Canon, if a judge to whom a matter has been assigned 

would be disqualified because of a financial interest in a party (other than and interest that could be substantially 

affected by the outcome, disqualification is not required if the judge (or the judge’s spouse or minor child) divests the 

interest that provided the grounds for the disqualification.”

JEANNETTE J. CLACK

CLERK OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHILIP J. DEVLIN

727 East Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., Suite A500 CHIEF DEPUTY

San Antonio, Texas 78206

Case 5:20-cv-00180-OLG Document 8 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 2
With Advisory Opinion 71 and 69 in mind and given that Chief Judge Garcia neither disqualified himself nor 

divested his interest in the stock during the pendency of the case, you may respond to Chief Judge Garcia’s disclosure 

of this potential case conflict. Should you wish to respond please submit your response no later than 10 (ten) days 

from the date of this correspondence. Any response received will be reviewed by a judge independent of Chief Judge 

Garcia. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Jeannette Clack

Jeannette Clack

Clerk of Court 

Case 5:20-cv-00180-OLG Document 8 Filed 08/25/21 Page 2 of 2