alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4963 

To address the concept of ‘‘Too Big To Fail’’ with respect to certain financial 

entities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself and Mr. HINCHEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To address the concept of ‘‘Too Big To Fail’’ with respect 

to certain financial entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Too Big to Fail, Too 

5 Big to Exist Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON INSTITUTIONS THAT 

7 ARE TOO BIG TO FAIL. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later 

9 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

10 Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to Congress a list 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4963 IH

1 of all commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, 

2 and insurance companies that the Secretary believes are 

3 too big to fail (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Too Big 

4 to Fail List’’). 

5 SEC. 3. BREAKING-UP TOO BIG TO FAIL INSTITUTIONS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, begin7 ning 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

8 the Secretary of the Treasury shall break up entities in9 cluded on the Too Big To Fail List, so that their failure 

10 would no longer cause a catastrophic effect on the United 

11 States or global economy without a taxpayer bailout. 

12 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

13 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘Too Big to Fail’’ 

14 means any entity that has grown so large that its failure 

15 would have a catastrophic effect on the stability of either 

16 the financial system or the United States economy without 

17 substantial Government assistance. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent Systems (1200).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1150, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Ephraim Glinert, Deputy Division Director, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 292-8930.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Computer and Social Systems Career proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: September 27, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-25190 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### DURAN v. STATE.

No. 23481.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 13, 1946.

Fryer & Milstead, of El Paso, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, ' State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of an aggravated assault, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of one year and a fine of $500.

This prosecution was brought under Section 5 of Article 1147, P.C.

It was charged in the complaint and information that theretofore, on or about the 29th day of March, A.D., 1946, Arthur Duran did, in the County of El Paso and State of Texas, unlawfully commit an aggravated assault in and upon Mary Anne Yager, the said Mary Anne Yager then and there being a female child and the said Arthur Duran then' and there being an adult male, etc.

To prove the offense charged the State was required to prove: (1) That Mary Anne Yager was a child; (2) that an assault was made upon her by the defendant, Arthur Duran; and (3) that the defendant, Arthur Duran, was an adult male person. If the State failed to prove either of the essential elements of the offense as charged, then the prosecution would fall. Now, let us see how the State undertook to discharge its burden to prove that appellant was an adult male person. It called Mr. Raymond O’Rourke, and proved by him that he was a deputy sheriff and was in charge of the jail; that at the time appellant was placed in jail he asked him how old he was, to which appellant replied that he was 29 years of age. To this testimony he promptly objected on the ground that he was under arrest and confined in jail at the time; that he was not warned; that his statement was not reduced to writing, signed and witnessed as required by Art. 727, C.C.P. The court overruled the objection, to which appellant then and there excepted, as shown by his Bill of Exception No. 1. It occurs to us that the admission of the testimony complained of was in violation of the article of the statute referred to. That it was material to the State in the establishment of its case is quite obvious, because without evidence showing that appellant was an adult male person the State’s case would necessarily fall. See White v. State, 68 Tex.Cr.R. 147, 151 S.W. 826. It is our opinion that the court erred in admitting the testimony, and in support of what we have said we refer to the following cases: Calloway v. State, 55 Tex.Cr.R. 262, 116 S.W. 575; Gaston v. State, 55 Tex.Cr.R. 270, 116 S.W. 582; Beltran v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 338, 163 S.W.2d 211; Dover v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 545, 197 S.W. 192.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

*357PER CURIAM. ■

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal' Appeals ’and approved by the Court.-
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A)
  1.
    
    I have read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SIFCO Industries, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal
controls and procedures to be designated under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; andb.
    
    paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 33-8545,34-51293 and 34-47986;
andc.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 11, 2007
    
    /s/ Jeffrey P. Gotschall

     Jeffrey P. GotschallChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
 1
By letter postmarked January 5, 2000, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's notice of negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance applicable to workers of the subject firm.

                    On December 21, 1999, workers of Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of America producing VHS videocassettes were denied TAA eligibility based on the finding that criterion (3) of Section 222 of the worker group eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 14, 2000 (65 FR 2432). A survey was conducted by the Department of the subject firms' major declining customers. None of the respondents increased import purchases while reducing business with Sony. Although Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of America was shifting production of VHS videocassettes from Dothan, Alabama to a foreign country, imports had not yet been returned to the U.S.                

The Department has obtained new information from the company documenting that the company has received VHS videocassette imports and the reliance on imports will continue as production decreases at the Dothan, Alabama plant.

## Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with VHS videocassettes produced by the subject firm contributed importantly to the decline in sales and to the total or partial separation of workers of the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following revised determination:

“All workers of Sony Magnetic Products Inc. of America, Dothan, Alabama, engaged in employment related to the production of VHS videocassettes, separated from employment on or after September 2, 1998 through two years from the issuance of this determination, are eligible to apply for worker adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.” 

Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of January, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-2505  Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -2     | 3      | 13     | -8     | 1      | 0      | 6      | -5     | 14     | -1    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 22     | -35    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

DROPBOX INC

vs.

MOTION OFFENSE, LLC, MOTION

OFFENSE, LLC, DROPBOX INC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00251-ADA

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE for purposes of limited referral on Wednesday July 06, 2022

at 10:00 AM before the Honorable Derek T. Gilliland. The Zoom link will be sent via email. 

SIGNED this 5th day of July, 2022.

______________________________

DEREK T. GILLILAND

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00251-ADA Document 146 Filed 07/05/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

United States of America

vs.

Miguel Angel Vasquez-Betancourt

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CR-98-LY

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to the District Court pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The District Court referred this case to the United States Magistrate 

Judge for the taking of the defendant’s felony guilty plea and for his allocution pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

On March 18, 2020, the defendant and counsel appeared before the Magistrate Judge. The 

undersigned addressed the defendant personally in open court, informed him of the admonishments 

under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and determined that he understood 

those admonishments. The defendant pled guilty to one count of Illegal Re-entry into the United 

States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The Magistrate Judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, with the advice of his attorney, consented to enter this guilty plea before 

the Magistrate Judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the District Judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charge against him and possible 

penalties;

3. The defendant understands his constitutional and statutory rights, understands that his

constitutional and statutory rights can be waived, and understands the meaning and 

effect of the waiver of his constitutional and statutory rights;
4. The defendant waived prosecution by indictment;

5. The defendant’s plea was made freely and voluntarily;

6. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; and

7. There is a factual basis for this plea. 

RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court accept the defendant’s guilty 

plea and, after reviewing the presentence investigation report, enter a Final Judgment of guilt 

against him.

WARNING

The parties may file objections to this Report and Recommendation. A party filing objections 

must specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which objections are being made. 

The District Court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections. See Battle v. 

United States Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987). A party’s failure to file written 

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained within this Report within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report shall bar that party from de novo 

review by the District Court of the proposed findings and recommendations and, except on grounds 

of plain error, shall bar the party from appellate review of proposed factual findings and legal 

conclusions accepted by the District Court to which no objections were filed. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53, 106 S. Ct. 466, 472-74 (1985); Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

SIGNED on March 18, 2020.

SUSAN HIGHTOWER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|U.S. Federal Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 776    | 48     | -87    | -291   | 225    | 366    | 263    | -162   | 691    | -163  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60     | -54    | 153    | 174    | 20     | 5      | -11    | -50    | 6      | 14    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -55    | 51     | -526   | 148    | 731    | -439   | 101    | 389    | 216    | 246   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -127   | -114   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023