alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 336    | 6,087  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 5,776  | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5036 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5036

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain knitted or crocheted fabrics 
                      containing elastomeric yarn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

   Mr. Dent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain knitted or crocheted fabrics 
                      containing elastomeric yarn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN KNITTED OR CROCHETED FABRICS CONTAINING ELASTOMERIC 
              YARN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Knitted or          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          crocheted fabrics                                                 12/31/2015
                          of a width
                          exceeding 30 cm,
                          containing by
                          weight 5 percent
                          or more of
                          elastomeric yarn
                          but not
                          containing rubber
                          thread (provided
                          for in subheading
                          6004.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the amended annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Timothy E. Vance, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy E. Vance

Timothy E. VanceCEODated: August 28, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                         1,658,627
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,852,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                   800,718
<INVENTORY>                                    14,761,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,497,936
<PP&E>                                         3,629,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,460,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,395,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,090,769
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       330,740
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,876,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,395,903
<SALES>                                        45,801,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,801,025
<CGS>                                          37,462,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,595,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,874,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                   727,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,147,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,147,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.34
        


</TABLE>
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 — Leite Mateus v Commission

(Case T-10/04) (1)

(Officials - Appointment - Revision of the classification in grade - Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 108/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Alberto Leite Mateus (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 20 December 2002, setting the applicant's final classification at Grade B3 with effect from 1 March 1988.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             143
<SECURITIES>                                       288
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                        91
<INVENTORY>                                        303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,563
<PP&E>                                          46,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,278
<BONDS>                                          6,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,381
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,111
<SALES>                                            116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,559
<CGS>                                              119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                       702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



        


</TABLE>
#### WELLS v. STATE.

No. 25611.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

James Pearson, County Atty., Sweet-water, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Selling whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $200.

Neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception accompany the record, without which nothing is presented fox review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
----

----

| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated: January 26, 2011 | /s/ Sam Shlomo Elimelech                                         |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Sam Shlomo Elimelech, President                                  |
|                          |                                                             |
|  Dated: January 26, 2011 | /s/ Gai Mar-Chaim                                                |
|                          | Gai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer (principal financial officer) |

----

----
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Ohio Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Ohio Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 6      | 11     | 35     | 39     | 64     | 69     | 44     | 131   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 120    | 142    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 23830.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1947.

Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of one yearling. The punishment assessed is confinement in1 the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction.

The record shows that the State’s principal witness was one Lacy Brewster who testified that on or about the 9th day of January, 1947, he and appellant placed a rope on á black yearling belonging to Henry Board; that at the time they roped the yearling it was in a field; that they took the yearling some distance from the field to a point about ISO feet from a country road and tied it in some bushes; that they then went to the town of Marshall where he, the witness, talked to a Mr. Bisch in the Meat Department of a Red & White store and offered to sell him a white-faced cow. The one tied in the woods was a black yearling. Bisch promised to come out the next day about 9 o’clock to inspect the animal. He did not go himself but he did send Bill Johnston to look at it. When Johnston arrived at the designated place, neither Lacy Brewster, the appellant, nor the yearling was there, whereupon he returned to Marshall.

Bcrtis Harris testified that he saw the yearling tied in the woods about SO yards from the road; that while he was there he saw appellant and Lacy Brewster come by going across the road; that he did not see appellant or Lacy Brewster around the yearling; that the nearest he saw them to the yearling was about 50 yards.

Dick Moore testified in substance to the same facts as Harris. It will thus be noted that the State relied upon the testimony of a self-confessed accomplice which is not sufficient to justify a conviction unless corroborated by facts or circumstances tending to connect the accused with the commission of the offense charged. What evidence have we here, independent of that of the accomplice, that appellant participated with the self-confessed thief in the commission of the offense or that he was present when it was committed? None. The fact that appellant was present when Lacy Brewster sought to sell the animal to Bisch would not tend to connect him with the original taking of the animal .in question. This was after the animal had been stolen and the theft thereof was completed. See McFarlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 200 S.W.2d 162; Nanney v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 633, 43 S.W.2d 115; Crawford v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 197 S.W.2d 575; Buchanan v. State, 25 Tex.App. 546, 8 S.W. 665; Jones v. State, 59 Tex.Cr.R. 559 (In fact 562) on rehearing, 129 S.W. 1118.

Having reached the conclusion that the accomplice was not corroborated on the material criminative facts testified to by him connecting appellant with participating *257in the original taking of the animal in question, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Mary Cato <mary.e.cato@gmail.com>

08/06/2010 04:37 PM To CCG-ONG@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject comments on EPA oil & gas air reg review

I attended an EPA public meeting in Arlington, TX on 8/2/10, and had the following reactions:

1. the regulations should address more than individual pollutants/toxics separately, but their impact on people & the environment in combination

2. "energy independence" is becoming a meaningless term - it's my understanding that oil & natural gas are produced and sold on worldwide markets, not merely for consumption locally (e.g., Arlington/TX/US) - for this reason, I believe it's much more important to protect people & the environment around drilling/fracking production processes with strong, enforced regulations rather than promote the industry & its profit-driven practices based on a meaningless idea

3. I believe EPA should be more active in promoting development of new technologies that would be less toxic through RFPs & funding research, rather than passively relying on what's currently available within the industries that have little or no interest in anything other than producing the most oil/gas at the least cost to themselves - the recent Gulf oil and West Virginia coal mine disasters show what happens when industries are allowed to self-regulate - best

"available" is not sufficient

Mary Cato Arlington, TX