alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                      
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
----

|   | **Exhibit                32.2** |
|--------|---------------------------------|

| **CERTIFICATION                PURSUANT TO** |
|----------------------------------------------|

| **18                U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** |
|--------------------------------------------|

| **AS                ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** |
|-------------------------------------------|

| **SECTION                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                2002** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                William D. Edwards,                Jr.                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William                D. Edwards, Jr.                                                                                                                                |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                |
#### In the Matter of Leon’s Collision Shop, Inc., Petitioner, v Patricia B. Adduci, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner, an auto repair shop, challenges a determination of respondent, the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, finding petitioner guilty of three charges and imposing a civil penalty. Petitioner contends that the record of the hearing does not contain substantial evidence to support the charges against it, and that the Commissioner erroneously relied on hearsay evidence. The record contains substantial evidence to establish that petitioner failed to provide the customer with an invoice, willfully failed to provide quality repairs, and fraudulently failed to replace parts paid for by the customer (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 398-d [1]; § 398-e [1] [i], [g]; 15 NYCRR 82.5 [g]; see, *Matter of White Plains Cent. Serv. v People,*149 AD2d 713, 714; *Matter of Montgomery Ward & Co. v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles,*90 AD2d 643). Additionally, hearsay evidence is admissible in an administrative hearing, and the charges were otherwise supported by competent testimony. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Queens County, Di Tucci, J.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 20
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 13, 2009
    By:
    /s/    Christian B. RagotChristian B. RagotPresident and Chief Executive Officer 76
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George G. Gedney, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered April 11, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4867 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain licorice extract derivatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain licorice 

extract derivatives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LICORICE EXTRACT DERIVATIVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Licorice extract derivatives 

including those described 

as Glycyrrhizic and 

Glycyrrhenticic Acids and 

their salts and esters (provided for in subheading 

2938.90.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4867 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4940 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4940

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
 dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(Sp-4-2)- [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2-sulfonato(3-
                  )-kN29,kN30, kN31, kN32]cuprate(1-).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
 dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(Sp-4-2)- [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2-sulfonato(3-
                  )-kN29,kN30, kN31, kN32]cuprate(1-).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-OCTADECANAMINIUM, N,N-DIMETHYL-N-OCTADECYL-,(SP-4-2)- 
              [29H,31H-PHTHALOCYANINE-2-SULFONATO(3-)-KN29,KN30, KN31, 
              KN32]CUPRATE(1-).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(Sp-4-2)- [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2-sulfonato(3-
)-kN29,kN30, kN31, kN32]cuprate(1-)) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 72-6062.

#### Valdez *v.*California Selective Service Local Board No. 44 et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly, United States District Judge for **

the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARACELI GUZMAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73933

Agency No. A074-385-546

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued November 4, 2010

Submitted November 30, 2010 

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RYMER, Circuit Judge, and KENNELLY,

District Judge.** 

FILED

DEC 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Araceli Guzman, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an

order reinstating her January 10, 1996 order of exclusion and deportation. We

deny the petition. 

I

Guzman’s application to adjust her status was not denied on the basis of the

ten-year bar in INA § 212(a)(9)(C), but because of her January 10, 1996 removal

and bar from entering the United States “for a period of one year.” The one-year

bar was in effect at the time of her removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A) (1994). 

Reinstatement of removal was ordered pursuant to INA § 241(a)(5), which applies

retroactively. Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30, 33 (2006). Thus,

neither the denial of Guzman’s application nor the reinstatement of the prior order

had an impermissible retroactive effect. Guzman does not challenge any of the

factual predicates for reinstatement. See Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921, 925

(9th Cir. 2003).

II

Guzman did not seek discretionary waiver until after her removal order was

reinstated. This meant that she was ineligible for “any relief,” including

adjustment of status. 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5); cf. Duran-Gonzales v. DHS, 508 F.3d
1227, 1236 (9th Cir. 2007). Any error in the 2009 denials of her waiver

applications is harmless. See Padilla, 334 F.3d at 924–25. 

III

Guzman had no right to counsel in the reinstatement proceeding because it

was not before an immigration judge. Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d

484, 497 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). Thus, she cannot claim her attorney was

ineffective during the proceeding. Nor can she claim that counsel was ineffective

in failing to file an I-212 waiver application. See Balam-Chuc v. Mukasey, 547

F.3d 1044, 1050–51 (9th Cir. 2008). DHS wasn’t obliged to allow her to file for

cancellation of removal, as she never sought that relief. See Fernandez-Vargas,

548 U.S. at 42 n.9. Guzman is not similarly situated to the alien in In re CisnerosGonzales, 23 I. & N. Dec. 668, 668-69 (BIA 2004), who had applied for

cancellation of removal prior to his removal proceeding. Her remaining due

process arguments lack merit.

PETITION DENIED.
Notice of Appearance of Counsel Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

CYWEE GROUP LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION 6:20-cv-00128-ADA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Plaintiff hereby notifies the Court that Mark D. Siegmund of Shore Chan DePumpo LLP 

makes a formal entry of appearance in the above-styled and numbered causes as counsel for 

Plaintiff, CyWee Group Ltd. The undersigned counsel requests a copy of all pleadings, discovery, 

correspondence and orders be sent to him. 

Case 6:20-cv-00128-ADA-JCM Document 30 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Notice of Appearance of Counsel Page | 2

DATED: November 23, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund_____ 

Michael W. Shore (Texas 18294915)

mshore@shorechan.com

Alfonso G. Chan (Texas 24012408)

achan@shorechan.com

Ari B. Rafilson (Texas 24060456)

arafilson@shorechan.com

William D. Ellerman (Texas 24007151)

wellerman@shorechan.com

Corey M. Lipschutz (Texas 24099303)

clipschutz@shorechan.com

Mark D. Siegmund (Texas 24117055)

msiegmund@shorechan.com

SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP

901 Main Street, Suite 3300

Dallas, Texas 75202

Tel: (214) 593-9110

Fax: (214) 593-9111

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF 

CYWEE GROUP LTD.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served or delivered 

electronically via U.S. District Court [LIVE]- Document Filing System, to all counsel of record, 

on this the 23rd day of November 2020.

/s/ Mark D. Siegmund

Mark D. Siegmund

Case 6:20-cv-00128-ADA-JCM Document 30 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | -2     | 5      | 0      | -1     | -2     | -1     | -1     | 0      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4744 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cyproconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Cyproconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYPROCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.59 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cyproconazole) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4744 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4761 

To suspend temporarily the duty on tris 2-(Hydroxy ethyl)-isocyanurate 

(THEIC). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on tris 2-(Hydroxy ethyl)- 

isocyanurate (THEIC). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIS 2-(HYDROXY ETHYL)-ISOCYANURATE 

4 (THEIC). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Tris 2-(Hydroxy ethyl)- 

isocyanurate (THEIC) 

(CAS No. 83990-7) (provided for in subheading 

2933.69.60) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4761 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 99**

**CERTIFICATION**

*18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:*

          In connection with this quarterly report of Standard Commercial Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on or about the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to his knowledge: 

          1.   This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934: and 

          2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of Standard Commercial Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

| Date:   November 8, 2002 |  
 
    
 
 
 
 
By

 

/s/ ROBERT E HARRISON

 
 

 

  
 
 
**Robert E Harrison President, Chief Executive Officer**

 
 
 
 
 
By

 

/s/ ROBERT A SHEETS

 
 

 

  
 
 
**Robert A Sheets Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|