alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0560

_____________________________
M ELISSA K ENNEDY ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

October 15, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

M AKAR , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Melissa Kennedy, pro se
, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|Colorado Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Colorado Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 7      | 27     | 35    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTINUSTIN DIVISION

Eddie Lee Wilson, Chester Jackson Sr.

vs.

§

§

§

§

NO: AU:20-CV-00311-RP

Robert Riley Baucom, Deputy John K. Bennett, §

Sheriff Thomas Norsworthy, City of Caldwell,

Burleson County

ORDER

The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear

for a final pretrial conference on Friday, September 17, 2021 at 02:30 PM in the United States

Courthouse, Courtroom #4, Fifth Floor, 501 West 5th Street, Austin, Texas.

The parties should consult Local Rules CV-16(f)–(g) regarding matters to be filed in advance

of the final pretrial conference. Each party is expected to file the materials required by Local Rule

CV-16(e) as one electronic document, styled as a “Notice to the Court,” with each of the 10

submissions identified in the Local Rules (as applicable) attached as an exhibit to that electronic

document. If a party deems it necessary to file any of those submissions under seal, it may file one

separate electronic document, styled as a “Motion for Leave to File Under Seal,” and attach those

submissions as exhibits. Any such motion should explain in detail why sealing the attached exhibits

is necessary. Similar expectations govern the submissions required by Local Rule CV-16(f).

sets

final pretrial conference

Austin

on 2nd day of September, 2021.

Robert Pitman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00311-RP Document 72 Filed 09/02/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 23



                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference  of our report  included in this quarterly report on Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997, of Southern California
Edison Company into the previously filed Registration Statements which
follow:

     Registration Form      File No.         Effective Date
     -----------------      --------         --------------

         Form S-3           33-53288         November 6, 1992
         Form S-3           33-50251         September 21, 1993
         Form S-3           33-59001         May 15, 1995
         Form S-3          333-00497         February 2, 1996



                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Los Angeles, California
November 12, 1997
#### WELCH v. STATE.

No. 25265.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the local option liquor law and assessed a fine of $1,000 and he appeals.

The testimony shows a sale of liquor to one, Winlow Magness, who was in company with a representative of the Texas Liquor Control Board. The information herein charges two former convictions of a like character. The testimony seems to be sufficient to show a sale to Magness by the appellant.

There are two bills of exception in the record, the first relating to the insufficiency of the evidence, and containing some conclusions of appellant’s attorney, as well as certain purported objections to portions of the evidence. The trial court did not sign such bill, but did certify that no such objections were made. In addition to the attempted bill being multifarious, under the record presented, the same seems not to have happened. The bill will therefore be overruled.

The second bill of exception is in the same condition as the one above discussed. It seems that appellant was endeavoring to complain of a violation of the rule under which the witness had been placed. In his original testimony a witness had under-estimated the distance of a turn in the road from an adjacent cemetery. The witness was permitted to take the stand and correct his estimate of this distance. An attempted qualification of this bill contained the statement that no objection was made to the witness thus making this correction. Appellant, however, in an exception to such qualification, asserts that such objection was made and gives his reason therefor. This exception is not certified to over the signature of the judge. The matter itself seems to be of but little moment, and the distance of such turn in the road from the cemetery seems to be of small importance in this trial. The bill is not certified to by the trial judge and is overruled.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
#### HERNANDEZ v. STATE.

No. 26613.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1953.

Theo. Pat Henley, San Antonio, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

- GRAVES,' Presiding Judge.

, Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Frio County of the offense of'the unlawful possession of marihuana, and was by the. jury awarded a term of two, years in the state penitentiary.

On the night of December 6, 1952, two Texas Highway Patrolmen, on State Highway No-. 280 some two miles north of Pear-sall in' said county, stopped an automobile which failed to ‘have the tail light thereon. Appellant .was sitting in the back seat of this car, and immediately upon being halted by the officers,, appellant threw a package out' of the car. This package was recovered and contained three cigarettes, which were examined, by the State Chemist at Austin and declared to have been marihuana.

There are two bills of exception in the record which certify that the appellant was indicted on May 26', 1953 for this offense; that an attorney from San Antonio made bond for the appellant and stated to the court that one of the bondsmen represented the appellant. The case was set for trial on June 1, 1953, and when the same was called for trial, appellant informed the court that his attorney had not arrived, whereupon the case was passed until June 4, 1953. Appellant was instructed by the court to contact his attorney and have him present. When the case was called for trial on June 4, 1953, appellant again informed the court that his attorney was not present and that he had not seen him, whereupon the case was passed until one o’clock of that day, and at such time appellant announced that he had not heard from his attorney and had not employed another one to represent him. Thereupon the court proceeded to try this case without an attorney for the appellant.

The only question presented before us in this record is the action of the trial court in trying' the appellant’s case without having appointed an attorney to represent him. The appellant was charged with a non-capital case, and the court was under no duty to appoint an attorney to represent him under the circumstances here present. See Thomas v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 551, *553106 S.W.2d 289; Loggins v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 125 S.W.2d 565; also Article 494, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

■Appellant entered a plea- of; not guilty and was tried by a jury. ’ Therefore,1 Art. 10a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., requiring the-appointment of an attorney in the event of a plea of guilty before the court is not applicable in this instance where the trial was had under a plea of not guilty.

We see no' error in the record,' nor has any-been presented to us* by virtue of the court’s failure to appoint 'an attorney to represent the appellant in a case of this character.

■The judgment is therefore affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Capsicum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Capsicum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OLEO CAPSICUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Oleo Capsicum (CAS No. 

8023–77–6) (provided for 

in subheading 3301.90.10) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4960 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officerof Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (“Enbridge Management”), hereby certifiesthat the Enbridge Management Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005, filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such Annual Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Enbridge Management.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Enbridge Management and will beretained by Enbridge Management and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

**Date: February 22,2006**

| **/s/**MARK A. MAKI                                      | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Mark A. Maki                                             | ** ** |
| Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial  Officer | ** ** |

 

----
Exhibit 32. 2




Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) by United American Petroleum Corp. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Christian NegriChristian NegriTreasurer





Date:  January 21, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to United American Petroleum Corp. , and will be retained by United American Petroleum Corp., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








1
|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                           
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                           
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 29     | 19     | 4      | 2      | 4      | 2      | 2      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted as Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:

(i.) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 26, 2007 |  | /s/    DARIO
SACOMANI                                              
|                        |  | Dario Sacomani Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.9


                               BONUS 6 STUD POKER
                         "A new way to play Stud Poker"
                               9459 G. Highway 5
                             Douglasville, GA 30135
                                 1-800-505-6606

December 28, 2000

TO: TEN STIX GAMING
    P.O. BOX 699
    IDAHO SPRINGS, COLO. 80452

SUBJECT: LIC. AGREEMENT

I the legal and lawful owner of Bonus 6 Stud Poker agree to extend to Ten Stix
Gaming a non-exclusive distribution agreement for all areas of the U.S.
excluding the state of Colorado and Puerto Rico.

For this distribution agreement, Ten Stix Gaming agrees to relay to myself 2000
shares of common stock at the time this contract is approved by both parties.

Ten Stix will be responsible for all marketing costs and in return will receive
35% of all gross revenues of casinos that are contracted thru Ten Stix Gaming.
All contracts will be forwarded and billing will be thru my office.


ACCEPTED BY /s/ Tom Sawyer                      ACCEPTED BY /s/ Tom Perkins
--------------------------                      ---------------------------
OFFICER OF TEN STIX GAMING                      TOM PERKINS
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Quarterly
Report), of Southern California Edison Company (the Company), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of his
knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 2, 2007



/s/    ALAN J.
FOHRERAlan J. Fohrer Chief Executive Officer Southern California Edison Company/s/    THOMAS M.
NOONANThomas M. Noonan Chief Financial Officer Southern California Edison Company


This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.