alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 43     | 11     | 4      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | W      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CERTIFICATION

I, Larry Mosley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Data Call Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2011

/s/ Larry MosleyCFO and Director
----

Key to symbols used

(The type of procedure is determined by the legal basis proposed by the Commission)

Information relating to voting time

Unless stated otherwise, the rapporteurs informed the Chair in writing, before the vote, of their position on the amendments.

Abbreviations used for Parliamentary Committees

Abbreviations used for Political Groups

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Marshall, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered September 7, 1988, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

*428Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s failure to disclose certain alleged exculpatory information violated the rule enunciated in *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83). The information requested consisted of the source of a hearsay statement linking the complainant to drug dealing. This information was in no way exculpatory and, even assuming that it was true, there was no reasonable possibility that the failure to disclose the information contributed to the verdict *(cf., People v Vilardi,*76 NY2d 67). We also disagree with the defendant’s further claim that the prosecutor’s delay in giving him a police report which allegedly contained exculpatory *Brady*material constituted a violation of the People’s obligation under CPL 30.30 to be ready for trial within six months of commencement of the criminal proceeding. Since there was no evidence that the delay affected the People’s declaration of readiness, there was no basis for relief pursuant to that provision *(see, People v McKenna,*76 NY2d 59; *People v Heller,*120 AD2d 612; *People v Cole,*90 AD2d 27).

Further, the trial court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the complainant’s proposed in-court identification testimony. Since the complainant knew the defendant, the alleged suggestiveness of the photo array viewed by the complainant would not preclude his in-court identification of the defendant *(see, People v Gissendanner,*48 NY2d 543, 552).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Hooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5018 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. YOUNG of Indiana) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Propiconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPICONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Propiconazole) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5018 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1730

EARNEST P. CLARK, Petitioner, versus EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (03-0631-BLA) Submitted: November 24, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. S. F. Raymond Smith, RUNDLE & RUNDLE, L.C., Pineville, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Mark E. Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, GREENBERG TRAURIG, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Respondent Eastern Associated Coal Corporation. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Earnest P. Clark seeks review of a decision and order of the Benefits Review Board (“Board”) affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-45 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. SeeClark v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. , No. 03-0631-BLA (BRB April 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald J. Semanick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                            /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Ronald J. Semanick
                            Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                              and Treasurer
                            November 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4627 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4627

 To extend and make a technical correction to the temporary suspension 
   of duty on certain cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas 
                               manifolds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend and make a technical correction to the temporary suspension 
   of duty on certain cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas 
                               manifolds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAST STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS 
              MANIFOLDS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.94 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain cast stainless steel 
single-piece exhaust gas manifolds) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``9902.01.50'' and inserting 
        ``8409.91.50''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
4/24/2015

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

COANo. 

SULLIVAN, JOSEPH EDWARD Tr. Ct. No. 007-1018-12 

The Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review has this day 

Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this offic

days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in 

petition.]

A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Exhibit 10.11(h)
 AMENDMENT NO. 7
TO THE  VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC RETIREMENT PLAN
 (As Amended and Restated Effective June 1, 2005)
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1.
    
    Effective January 1, 2009, Section 8.2(f)of the Plan (as amended by Amendment No. 4 to the
Plan) is amended by adding a new sentence to the end thereof to read in its entirety as
follows:
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 15 th December
 Attest:
    
    
    
    VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC/s/ Laureen Quinter
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Paul Dumas
#### Ex parte CHADWICK.

No. 25141.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1951.

Waldo E. Ximenes, San Antonio, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This case is properly before the Court as an original filing by which the relator seeks his discharge from the penitentiary.

According to his petition and certified copies of judgment and other proceedings, he was convicted in the '54th Judicial District Court of McLennan County, on November 23rd, 1942, and sentenced by jury verdict to nine years in the penitentiary. Proper judgment was duly entered and relator is confined in the penitentiary by virtue thereof. In his petition relator sets out the history showing that he was later paroled by the Governor of Texas and, while under parole, was arrested by officers in the City of Waco for driving while intoxicated. The Federal authorities seemed to have some information and asked the local parole officer not to recommend revocation of his parole until they could investigate his criminal record. The result of their investigation led to his conviction and service of some years in the Federal Penitentiary. It is further alleged *129that if he is given credit for the time served in the penitentiary and earned good time that his nine years in the State Pen-' itentiary should be fulfilled and he should be discharged from further service thereunder.

This contention is made by virtue of the holding of this Court in Ex parte Baird, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 845. The holding in that case is discussed by the opinion of this date in Ex parte Spears, Tex.Cr.App., 235 S.W.2d 917, and is specifically overruled. The contention in the instant case will not be sustained and relator is remanded to the custody of the penitentiary authorities who will hold him until he has served the sentence imposed upon him in the State Court, without giving credit for any time served in the Federal Penitentiary.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthTrust Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wallace
D. Malone, Jr., principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

By: /s/ Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
--------------------------------------
Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SouthTrust Corporation and will be retained by SouthTrust
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

9 marca 2006

(2006/C 58/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Informacje przekazane przez Państwa Członkowskie, dotyczące pomocy państwa przyznanej na mocy rozporządzenia Komisji (WE) nr 70/2001 z dnia 12 stycznia 2001 r., zmienionego rozporządzeniem Komisji (WE) nr 364/2004 z dnia 25 lutego 2004 r., w sprawie zastosowania art. 87 i 88 traktatu WE w odniesieniu do pomocy państwa dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw

(2006/C 58/02)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

----

Informacje przekazane przez Państwa Członkowskie dotyczące pomocy państwa przyznanej na mocy rozporządzenia Komisji (WE) nr 70/2001 z dnia 12 stycznia 2001 r. w sprawie zastosowania art. 87 i 88 Traktatu WE w odniesieniu do pomocy państwa dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw

(2006/C 58/03)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4122 — Burda/Hachette/JV)

Sprawa kwalifikująca się do rozpatrzenia w ramach procedury uproszczonej

(2006/C 58/04)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

(2)Dz.U. C 56 z 5.3.2005, str. 32.

----

----

Brak sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszonej koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.3787 — Heinemann/HDS Retail/JV)

(2006/C 58/05)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

W dniu 8 lutego 2006 r. Komisja podjęła decyzję o nie sprzeciwianiu się wyżej wymienionej koncentracji oraz uznaniu jej za zgodną z regułami wspólnego rynku. Powyższa decyzja zostaje wydana na mocy art. 6 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 139/2004. Pełny tekst decyzji jest dostępny wyłącznie w języku niemieckim i będzie opublikowany po uprzednim usunięciu ewentualnych tajemnic handlowych przedsiębiorstw. Tekst decyzji będzie dostępny:

----

Europejski Bank Centralny

----

OPINIA RADY PREZESÓW EUROPEJSKIEGO BANKU CENTRALNEGO

z dnia 2 marca 2006 r.

w sprawie zalecenia Rady Unii Europejskiej dotyczącego mianowania nowego członka Zarządu Europejskiego Banku Centralnego

(CON/2006/14)

(2006/C 58/06)

Sporządzono we Frankfurcie nad Menem, dnia 2 marca 2006 r.

Prezes EBC

Jean-Claude TRICHET

----

(1)Dz.U. L 17 z 17.2.2006, str. 58.

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RANDY DAVOE JACKSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1589

[ November 16, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 09

- 001342A.

Randy Davoe Jackson, Jasper , pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER

, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25124]



[[Page 58790]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Off-Track Wagering Compact between the Chickasaw Nation 
and the State of Oklahoma, which was executed on July 26, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective October 2, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: September 20, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-25124 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2257

___________ Keith Arthur Chambers, #803999B; * and all present and future * inmates similarly situated at the * Iowa State Men & s Reformatory, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Sally M. Chandler-Halford; John * F. Ault; Russell Behrends, C/O, * [UNPUBLISHED] and all present and future employees * at the Iowa State Men & s Reformatory, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 23, 1997 Filed: September 25, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. KeithArthur Chambers, an inmate at the Iowa State Men & s Reformatory, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) alleging defendants were violating Iow a law and his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by placing inmates fromThe Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United Sta tes District Court for 1 the Northern District of Iowa. -2- Admi nistrativeSegregation on a chain gang. The District Court dismissed th e 1 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). After careful review of the record and Cham bers’s brief on appeal, we conclude that the District Court’s judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.