Memorandum 

To: Colleen Delaney 

CC: 

From: Timothy DeJulis 

Date: 1/20/2012 

Re: Soil Remediation Project Totals 

Reviewing infonnation regarding the number of soil remediation-projects for the last three years 

revealed that the average number of projects in both categories (soil venting/aif stripping and 

landfarming) is 5. Yearly numbers are presented below. Analytical testing data offered for each new 

project during this period is attached to this memorandum. 

SVE/AS Landfarm 

2008 4 . 3 

2009 1 2 

2010 4 2 

2011 3 .2 

DATE: ym-0^<W 
ADVENTURE' S FIRST STOP 

N4AVERIK,INC. 

880 West Center Street 

North Salt Lake, UT 84054-2913 

Phone:(801)335-3898 

Fax:(801)936-9502 

E-mail: mamun.rashid(Smaverik.com 

March 9,2011 

Robin Davis UTAH D6PARTMSNT OF 

Utah Department of Environmental Quality iNVmONMSNTAL QUALITY 

Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) ^ ea Q'H^ 

195 North 1950 West JS^nn^.^M , 

o?".^*^''!^^^??* uo... . .o.n DIVISION OF AIR QUAUTY Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4840 

RE: Air Emissions Report 

Maverik Store #248 

191 North Main Street, Huntington, Utah 

Facility ID# 5000171, UST Release Site EJYS 

/f- Dear Ms. Davis: 

Maverik is pleased to submit this report summarizing the air emissions monitoring conducted to date 

at the Maverik Store #248 site in Huntington, Utah. This work was perfonned in accordance with the 

work plan and budget JYS-22 approved by the DERR on July 6, 2010. 

The site is currently undergoing corrective actions for gasoline-contaminated soil and groundwater. 

The remediation systems employed have been air sparging (AS), low soil vapor extraction (SVE), 

and high soil vapor extraction (HVE). Continuous operation of the AS/SVE system began in May 

2000, with the system configured to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. A high vacuum 

extraction (HVE) system started operation at the site in March 2004. Emissions from the SVE and 

HVE systems are discharged directly to the atmosphere through two separate vent lines. See Figure 

1 for the location of the AS/SVE/HVE systern shed as well as for the location of the AS/SVE/HVE 

wells. Please note that the old HVE system at the site, we believe, was not having the desired 

maximum impact on contamination because of its low flow capacity. Also, the AS blower at the site 

recently broke down and needed replacement. In consultation with DERR, Maverik has recently 

completed the replacement of the inadequate HVE system and the broken AS blower. The new 

system has been running since the middle of year 2007, and was turned off on January 6, 2011. 

11-03-09 Maverik Air Emissions Report 
Ms. Robin Davis 

y y March 9, 2011 

Page 2 

Air emissions data for the period between May 23, 2000 and June 24, 2010 have been submitted in 

earlier reports. This report summarizes the air emissions data collected since June 24, 2010. 

SAMPLING 

Air emission samples were collected from the SVE and HVE systems on January 6, 2011 (6^ SemiAnnual for HVE and 11**" Semi-Annual for SVE). All air emissions samples were collected from the 

sampling port on the exhaust stack using SUMMA canisters provided by Air Toxics of Folsom, 

California. Chain-of-custody protocol was observed, and the SUMMA canisters were shipped to Air 

Toxics-of Folsom, California for the analyses. Samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, 

ethylbenzene, total xylenes, (BTEX), methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), and total petroleum 

hydrocarbons - gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO) according to Modified EPA Method TO-3. 

Laboratory analysis reports and chain-of-custody record forms are attached. 

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 

In order to reach an accurate understanding of the overall air emissions monitoring trends at the site, 

data for all of the air samples analyzed to date (17 events for the SVE system and 13 for the HVE 

system) were recompiled and reviewed for consistency. In particular, unusually high benzene and <^ 

TPH concentrations were treated as spikes and assumed to not represent sustained concentrations. 

These concentrations were most likely obtained from samples collected too close to a restart of the 

system. Therefore, to avoid inflated daily emission rate and resulting total mass removal estimate, 

high concentration data were ignored and eariier available sustained concentration data were used to 

calculate the daily emission rate and the total mass removal estimate for the event. We corrected 

few of the eariier "spike" data as well that were missed in our eariier reports. The final emission data, 

especially for TPH, thereby look substantially different from what was reported eariier. Tables 1 thru 

4 show the updated airflow rates and air emissions analyses for the SVE and HVE systems. Taking 

into account the set of assumptions mentioned in Tables 3 and 4, we estimate that a total of 

approximately 179 pounds of benzene and 11,500 pounds of TPH-GRO were removed from the site 

through the operation of the SVE system. Benzene and tPH-GRO mass removed from the site 

through the HVE system were 5 and 1,119 pounds respectively. The projected yearly emissions 

calculated for the recent samples meet DAQ's "De Minimus" levels for benzene (500 pounds) and 
Ms. Robin Davis 

March 9, 2011 

Page 3 

TPH (5 tons or 10,000 pounds). Please note that the emissions do not include mass removal via 

contaminated groundwater extraction through the HVE system. To date, approximately 18,000-

gallons of contaminated groundwater has been recovered and discharged to the sewer under a 

permit from the Castle Valley Special Service District. Figures 2 thru 5 display the mass removal 

rates and cumulative mass removal for benzene and TPH-GRO forthe SVE and HVE systems. 

As shown in Figures 2 through 5, mass removal rates for both benzene and TPH have decreased 

substantially and the actual masses being recovered are no longer substantial. This is somewhat 

expected since the AS/SVE/HVE system operated at the site for a long time and it is likely that 

residual contamination is mostly limited in the groundwater. Based on the most recent mbnitoring 

data (2010 1^^ Semi-Annual), contamination substantially above the RBCA Tier 1 Screening Levels 

still exists around the tank basin in MW-5 (0.5 mg/L of MTBE), MW-6 (0.54 mg/L of MTBE), RW-2 

(0.76 mg/L of MTBE), and RW-5 (2 mg/L of MTBE). Apparently, MTBE is the only contaminant that 

remains at the site above the regulatory limit. Therefore a shifted focus on remediation of residual 

groundwater contamination may be required at the site as opposed to continued use of the 

AS/SVE/HVE system. 

As you are aware, at a number of sites, Maverik recently applied activated persulfate (Klozur® 

CR) into the aquifer for remediation of the residual petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the 

groundwater via chemical oxidation and enhanced bioremediation. Klozur® CR combines, 

persulfate chemical oxidation with aerobic biodegradation. Klozur<5) CR is a single, formulated 

product consisting of high pH-activated Klozur® persulfate and PermeOx® Plus engineered 

calcium peroxide, uniting the strengths of both products to treat contaminant source zones and 

down-gradient plumes. Klozur® CR is manufactured by FMC Corporation of Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania with technical support by ChemRem International of Albuquerque, New Mexico. 

Klozur® CR can be pressure injected via existing wells at the site. We recommend considering 

application of Klozur® CR at this site too. If DERR agrees with the approach, Maverik can 

prepare and submit a work plan for approval by the DERR. 
f : Ms. Robin Davis 

y y March 9, 2011 

Page 4 

We appreciate your assistance with this site. Please be aware that Maverik wishes to comply with all 

DERR regulations and mandates, and we reaffirm our commitment to DERR's goals of protecting 

public health and Utah's environment. Please feel free to contact me at 801-335-3898 should you 

have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Maverik, Inc. 

Mamun Rashid, PE, PhD 

Utah Certified UST Consultant CC-175 

Senior Environmental Engineer 

Attachments: 

Table 1 - SVE System Air Flow Rate Calculation 

Table 2 - HVE System Air Flow Rate Calculation 

Table 3 - Summary of Air Emissions Analyses (SVE) 

Table 4 - Summary of Air Emissions Analyses (HVE) 

Figure 1 - AS/SVE/HVE Well Locations Map 

Figure 2 - Benzene Removal Data (SVE) 

Figure 3 - TPH Removal Data (SVE) 

Figure 4 - Benzene Removal Data (HVE) 

Figure 5 - TPH Removal Data (HVE) 

Analytical Laboratory Report: Air Toxics Ltd. 1101142 

cc: Jon Black, Division of Air Quality 
15 

H H 

< 3 

_ l . 

3 Z 

O O 

_ l H-

< O 

O Z 

U i Iz 

D 

I 

3 S 

ul * 

< O 

I— 

w 

• 

+ • 

o 

i _ 

^ O 

S | | 

9:^ > CO 

^ r o 

8 ^ o 

^ 0) li 

ra 3 OJ 

* Q . o 

CM ^ to 

< O <U 

Q i 5 - c 

* W g 

, i*; + -

« ^ llS Q- ^ 

T-^ II ra 

II Q . c 

Ism 

o g ^ 

o o o 

<u E 

ro 

Q 

Q. CD <U 

Q - W ^ 

O o 

iiJ o 

-«= ^ 

« -5 

"M ^ ro 

O CM T - TII II II II 

ro 

«J Z Z<0«>tDt02h-<Dl O 

^ ^ TJ00 ^ CO CX3 

i n (O •<-

cvi 1- -r^ 

CO 

(NCNCNCSICNCMCNiCsJOJCNCMCNiCNCNCNCgC N 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O 

CDOqOCDOOOOOOOOOOO O 

(N csi Cvi CN CN cvi cvi cvi CN CN cvi CN csi CN csi cvi cvi 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O 

o o O CSI CN CN CO i n m CO OO o 

o o O O O o o o o o To o5 o CO CD T— CO CO CD o CO i?5 00 o m 

CO CN CO CN CO o CN CN o -r- CN o 

lO csi OD CO CO CN CN CO CO 

o O O O o o o o o O o o O o 

t CD 

o . 5 

Q) to •— _ci 

5 g 

o u. 

" c ro 

0) XI — 

o> ro ^ 

? n ~ CN 

C t L CN 

Q. 2 ro 

E 0) c 

ro Q 

CO . =5 

CD Q- w 

£ ro 

.E £ 33 Qro a. 

i a 

OJ 

ro g> 

ro 

XJ 

to 

QL <U 

1^" 

0) (D 

— <D 

LLI Cl) 

C to c CN TM 2 O Jo 

CN - - n O 

CD 

=j £2 

ro a) 

ro 

ro 

.2^ Q. 

^ 8 

0) ro 

" - a 

: c c 3 

CD a; 

05 

c to 

ro CD 

CD £ 

to CD 

5 ro 

CO OJ 

0 E 

^ « ro1 i 2 5 

TM to 

OJ 

5 -^^ _o ro 

**- w 

S E 

d" a. 

o <u 

11 

^ t r ^ «^ c 

0) 0) i_- c CD 

•J5 ro ro 

O u . u . X 

T3 <U 

m 0) 

OJ CO 

to (U 

C £ 

o i 

•E to 

CO B 

1l 

<U' (D 

o OJ 

5 £ 

C3 m" 

CO iS 

^ -S 

ro 

ra o 

S § 

ro <D 

s 1: « 5 

UJ 

o to 

u. < 

c 
y 

Q 5 

3 Z 

o o 

o 

z 

h-

• 3 

X 

oo" 

% 

UJ 

Ct: O 

h" 

(0 

a: 

LU 

> 

< 

< 

o 

UJ 

Io 

Crt 

CO 

to 

Q. 

00 

O 

CD 

" 2 

CD LiQ -5 

* 52 

9> > CO 

^ C CO 

o o 

s a; 

* Q. O 

CNJ Jit; CO 

< O OJ 

Q tg . c 

^ + -

* E 

00 .fc Jr 

^ CL 73 

" LL 

II CL c 

=^ "o .2 

i f 0) to Ll_ "rt Io ^ ^ 

o o 

o o o 

o 

to 

sz 

o 

CO 

CD 

CD 

. « O 

0) B 

Q. 0} 

Q. E 

(U ?5 

£ b 

GL CO 

Q. CO 

CO ,„ 

^ Q. 

CD 

d 

II 

CN 

O 

O 

CNi 

E- u., 

CO CD 

QL 

m m m CO o TjTl- CO 

O lO Ti n l o l o 

CD CO CO 

O O O CD CO C3> O 

00 tXi <J) 

O O -"t 

T - T - T t 

If) CO CD 

O T- TTt 

O 

to 

O O P P P CN 

OOOOOQOOO Q 

a in 

o o 

CNCNCNCVJCVJCNCNCNCNCNCVJCNCV J 

OOOOOOOOOOOO O 

pOOOOOOOOOOO O 

NcNicvicNicvicvicNicvicNicNcvicvicv i 

OOOOOOOOOOOO O 

T t T t l O CO CD oo o T— 

O o o o o o o o T— T— 

cvi o CD CD 0 0 0 0 in CN CD 

o CN CN CN JN JVJ o CN T— o 

o5 CVJ T— T t T - o5 oS T t CO 

o T— o O o o o o o o o 

T3 

0) 

to 

rj. CD 

kco 

to 

CD 

_g 

CO 

O > 

i S XJ 

"to CD 

<D <D 

CO 

1- CD 

CX - o 

B 5 

o C 

CD 

CL 

^ CD 

CD ^ 

0) 

o 

z 

CD 

•D O 

0 C 

o ^ 

O 

y 
TABLE 3 

SUMMARY OF AIR EMISSIONS ANALYSES (SVE) 

MAVERIK STORE #248, HUNTINGTON, UTAH 

Date Flow Compound Concentration Dally 

Emission 

Projected Yearly 

Emission 

Mass 

Removed 

(scfm) (ug/L) (lbs/day) (lbs/year) (lbs) 

05/23/00 0 

(System Startup) 0 

05/30/00 61 Benzene 0.12 0.0007 0.2 0.004 

(Startup/First Monthly) TPH 31.6 0.17 63 1 

07/29/00 61 Benzene 0.16 0.0009 0.3 0:04 

(2nci Monthly) TPH 0.21 0.001 0.4 5 

12/30/00 61 Benzene 30 0.16 60 10 

(3rd Monthly) TPH 1,235 6.8 2,467 421 

08/03/01 61 Benzene 11 0.06 22 30-

(2nd Quarterly) TPH 471 2.6 941 1,227 

03/26/02 69 Benzene 180 0.06 22 41 

(3rd Quarterly) TPH 37,300 2.6 941 1,712 

05/31/02 67 Benzene 22 0.13 48 46 

(4th Quarterly) TPH 2,700 16 5,924 2,208 

09/18/02 61 Benzene 0.7 0.004 1 52 

(1st Semi-Annual) TPH 171 0.9 342 2,963 

06/06/03 61 ' Benzene 49 0.268 98 80 

(2nd Semi-Annual) TPH 2,080 11 4,155 4,248 

07/16/04 74 Benzene 23 0.153 56 98 

(3rd Semi-Annual) TPH 1,920 13 4,653 5,270 

12/20/04 62 Benzene 46 0.256 93 124 

(4th Semi-Annual) TPH 1,360 8 2,761 6,545 

07/26/05 50 Benzene 15 0.067 25 152 

(5th Semi-Annual) TPH 19.700 8 2,761 7.863 

12/15/05 110 Benzene 0.052 0.001 0.2 156 

(6th Semi-Annual) TPH 21 0.2 76 8,304 

09/08/06 110 Benzene 260 0.001 0.2 156 

(7th Semi-Annual) TPH 51,000 0.2: 76 8,349 

08/10/07 65 Benzene 19 0.111 40.4 165 

(8th Semi-Annual) TPH 1,050 6.1 2,235 8,880 

04/25/08 94 Benzene 1.6 0.013 4.9 173 

(9th Semi-Annual) TPH 500 4.2 1,539 9,549 

06/24/10 63 Benzene 0.75 0.004 1.5 179 

(10th Semi-Annual) TPH 243 1.4 501 11,314 

01/06/11 

(11th Semi-Annual) 

66 Benzene 

TPH 

0.097 

169 

0.0006 

1.0 

Notes: 

1 

0.2 

365 

179 

11,500 

The SVE system operated between 05/23/00 anci 06/06/03, and then again between 02/12/04 and 05/28/04. 

The system was off between 06/06/03 and 02/12/04 for HVE system addition and replacement of the SVE blower. 

The system was again off between 05/28/04 and 07/16/04 due to control problems. 

The system has sinc:e been repaired and is in continuous operation since 07/16/04. 

Air emissions data up to the 05/31/02 sampling event were reported earlier. 

However, air emissions data for 07/29/00 and 12/30/00 were never reported. 

No flow data were available for these tv«) sampling events. Available flow data from the preceding event was used In the emission calculation. 

Concentrations for.05/30/00 were reported by the laboratory as 0.037 and 7.5 ppm v/v for benzene and TPH, respectively, 

"ppmv" were converted to "ug/L" or "mg/M3," by multiplying by 1000, then by MW, and then dividing by 24055 (Air Toxics, Ltd.) 

We used 78.1 and 101.28 for MW for benzene and TPH, respectively. 

Both Benzene and TPH concentrations-for the 07/29/00 sampling event were reported by the laboratory as ND (0.05 ppm v/v). 

Reporting limit (0.05 ppm v/v) was used as the emission concentration for the event. 

The concentration values were then converted to ug/L accordingly. 

Analytical Laboratory states that the TPH value reported is a summation of all other compounds. 

Daily emission (lbs/day) is calculated as; ug/L * 2.2E-9 Ibs/ug * 28.3 UCF * scfm * 1440 min/day. 

Mass removed is calculated as: (average lbs/day * number of days) + mass removed during the previous period. 

We assumed an average 20% system downtime for the mass removed calculation except for the 

time period between 09/08/06 and 04/25/08 during which a 50% system downtime was assumed. 

ND indicates not detected above method detection limit. 

Concientrations showm in bold are likely to be spikes and do not represent sustained concentrations. 

As such, these concentrations were not used in daily emission, projected yeariy emission and mass removeci calculation. 
UJ 

> X 

X < 

< o 

ll 

i i 

S CN 

< o 

<i> 

cc 

0) c -c 

> o n 

.Si. iS 

o 

ta .2 

Q E 

UJ 

CO QJ 

o o 

<=>. a 

CD 

CN CN 

CD CO 

(U X 

N Q . 

to o 

|v> CN 

CNI CO 

OJ oo 

00 TT 

^ 'n 

in (o 

o t 

lo CO 

^ CJ 

o -a 

00 ^ 

in 05 

CD ro 

?; O 

o ^ 

in o 

CO ^ 

CO • ^ . 

CSJ CO in 

o < 

CO ~ 

o E 

o CO 

CSI o> ro 00 

• CO • CJ) 

CSJ 

in CM 

CO ro 

CSJ cn 

in g in 

S E 

1 

bo 

O c . £ a. fc !-

E S 

o S -I; 

O ^ 

<u -d o CO 

r E 2 -o 

O 3 c c 

o- 18 ^ g 

IU 

o « o ~ 

- >< 2 " « 

« «> 5 TD ~ 

O £ <B 

2 o o E 

Q. <U CO C 

" " 3 

C 0) E 

(0 

o 'u. 

c O 

•B ^ 

ro CO 

0) 0) 

<U 0) CO 

i r 5 2 ;5 

-O O CS| 

3 to .E o 

T3 

CL to £ £0 3 

in « 0) S 

— J3 J3 E 

E 

E 5 

Sot . 

5 S -a £ 

Q; to 

IU (1) 

Ol <u (0 

c o. ^ 

S i o X3 0) 

<U o ~~ O 3 

g) -o CM -r .2 

t CO «> C 

« (0 > v 

-1 5 E 

O) jQ — 

'o Xi ^ 

F -2 ^ £ ^ S ^ 

^ 5 S 3 1 ^ ^ ^ 8 I 

c a? I 

ro to * 

to T3 52 

«2 OT _ 

^ ro 3 2 

? 15 S 

TM ro £ m 

E S .2 ffl .

o9 ? 5 -D 

iS 3 E g 

> 

X v> in (Q <" I" !n J : x: TM ro 

H K I- 5 D 

1 S I 1 » S 

< p 5 § 
OVERHEAD 

CANOPY 

DISPENSER 

ISLANDS 

LU 

LU 

a: 

hco 

X 

h-. 

cn 

o 

o 

o 

CN 

OVERHEAD 

POWER 

c )( ) 

AS-12 AS-13 

/'->JHVE-1 HVE-1V->v 

^__Q§HVE-l O 

MP-1 

9 

MP-2 

MW 

AS-4 ^ 

AS 3f» ) 

^^nQi^ 

AS-1l(« ) 

-<> "^"S-KSVE-3 I 

rpnrp n 1 0) 1 CO 1 

1 3 1 

1 — i 1 _ i 1 

1 < 1 < 1 

1 O 1 O 1 

1 o ' o ' 1 O 1 O 1 

1 O 1 O 1 

1 OJ 1 eg 1 

•2 •)HVE 

RW-\I-A 4 , -XpVE-1 

-(^Rw a 

^^AS-1 0 

- 6 - QHVE 

( • ) RW-5 

O '^^^ o 

HVE-5 HVE-6 

/ 

GAS METEFD 

MAVERIK #248 

CINDERBLOCK 

WALL 6'HIGH 

FENCE W/LOC K 

APPROXIMATE 

PROPERTY 

BOUNDARY 

1D00-GALLON HOLDING TANK 

SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 

REMEDIATION SHED (AS/SVE/HVE) 

POWER POLE Locations of AS-7 and AS-8 are not known. 

** All locations are approximate. 

POWER POLE 

30 

SCALE IN FEET 

60 

EXPLANATION 

MONITOR POINT 

AIR SPARGE WELL 

HIGH VACUUM EXTRACTION WELL 

MONITORING WELL LOCATION 

© 

-o 

MW-1 

-(|> LOW VACUUM EXTRACTION WELL 

— NATURAL GAS LINE 

— P P — OVERHEAD POWER 

— = — ' — • — SANITARY SEWER 

WATERLINE 

NOTES 

* AS WELLS ARE SHOWN IN GREEN 

* LOW VACUUM EXTRACTION WELLS 

ARE SHOWN IN BLUE 

* HIGH VACUUM EXTRACTION WELLS 

ARE SHOWN IN RED 

MAVERIK, INC. 

REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT 

880 WEST CENTER STREET 

NORTH SALT UKE, UTAH 84054 

AS/SVE/HVE 

WELL LOCATIONS 

MAP 

MAVERIK STORE #248 

HUNTINGTON, UTAH 

DATE PREPARED: 03-09-2011 

FIGURE 1 
> 

o 

c 

N 

CM 

3 

LL. 

CO 

o 

CSJ v= 

o o 

(ABp/sqj) ajB^ geAOLua;^ 

O 

o 
o 

o 

o 

<N 

> 

(0 

> 

o 

E 

0) 

X 

CO 

o 

Ui 

iZ 

CXD CM CD 

(Aep/sqi) SVBB leAOuia^ 

90-6nv Q 
(sqg) paAOiue^ ||e)ox 

CO 

CB 

> 

o 

E 

Q> 

01 

c 

0) 

N 

c 

tD 

o • CN 

o 

Csl 

O 

O 

O 

O 

o 

o 

(Aep/sqi) e)e^ leAOuie^ 
(sqi) psAoiuid^ B^^oi 

o 

o 

CM 

> 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

CO CM 

(Aep/sqg) e;e^ leAOuie^ 

U-JB|/\| 

Ol-das 

- 60-das 

60-JB|/\| 

90-d9S 

0) 

ZO-deS re 

trO-JB|/\| 

O 
y 
V - Laboratory Services Binve W$B 

G 

1/24/2011 

Mr. Mamun Rashid 

Maverik Country Stores, Inc. 

880 West Center Street 

North Salt Lake UT 84054-2913 

Project Name: #248 

Project #: Air Monitoring 

Workorder #: 1101142 

Dear Mr. Mamun Rashid 

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) 

received on 1/11/2011 at Air Toxics Ltd. 

The data and associated QC analyzed by Modified TO-3 are compliant with the 

project requirements or laboratory criteria with the exception of the deviations noted in 

the attached case narrative. 

Thank you for choosing Air Toxics Ltd. for your air analysis needs. Air Toxics Ltd. is 

committed to providing accurate data of the highest quality. Please feel free to contact 

the Project Manager: Kyle Vagadori at 916-985-1000 if you have any questions 

regarding the data in this report. 

o 

Regards, 

Kyle Vagadori 

Project Manager 

180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630 

(916) 985-1000 .FAX (916) 985-1020 

Hours 6:30 A.M to 5:30 PST 

Page 1 of 12 
J Laboratory Services Sines 

WORK ORDER #: 1101142 

Work Order Summary 

CLIENT: Mr. Mamun Rashid 

Maverik Country Stores, Inc. 

880 West-Center Street 

North Salt Lake, UT 84054-2913 

BILL TO: Mr. Mamun Rashid 

Maverik Country Stores, Inc. 

880 West Center Street 

North Salt Lake, UT 84054-2913 

PHONE: 

FAX: 

DATE RECEIVED: 

DATE COMPLETED: 

801-936-5557 

801-936-1406 

01/11/2011 

01/24/2011 

P.O.# 11-7-248-6233 

PROJECT # Air Monitoring #248 

CONTACT: Kyle Vagadori 

FRACTION # 

OIA 

02A 

03 A 

04A 

04AA 

04B 

04BB 

NAME 

248-SVE-llS 

248-HVE-6S 

Lab Blank 

LCS 

LCSD 

LCS 

LCSD 

TEST 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

Modified TO-3 

RECEIPT 

VAC./PRES. 

5.0 "Hg 

4.2 "Hg 

N A 

N A 

N A 

N A 

, N A 

FINAL 

PRESSURE 

15 psi 

15 psi 

NA 

NA 

NA 

NA 

NA 

CERTIFIED BY: 

Laboratory Director 

DATE: 

01/24/11 

Certfication numbers: CA NELAP - 021 lOCA, L A NELAP/LELAP- AI 30763, 

N Y NELAP -11291, UT NELAP - 9166389892, AZ Licensure AZ0719 

Name of Accrediting Agency: NELAP/Florida Department of Health, Scope of Application: Clean Air Act, 

Accreditation number: E87680, Effective date: 07/01/09, Expiration date: 06/30/11 

Air Toxics Ltd. certifies that the test results contained in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards 

This report shall not be reproduced, except in fiill, without the written approval of Air Toxics Ltd. 

180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630 

(916) 985-1000 . (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 985-1020 

Page 2 of 12 
Laboratory Services Since 1989 

LABORATORY NARRATIVE 

Modified TO-3 

Maverik Country Stores, Inc. 

Workorder# 1101142 

Two 1 Liter Summa Canister samples were received on January 11, 2011. The laboratory performed 

analysis for volatile organic compounds in air via modified EPA Method TO-3 using gas 

chromatography with photo ionization and flame ionization detection. The TPH results are calculated 

using the response of Gasoline. A molecular weight of 100 is used to convert the TPH ppmv result to 

ug/L. The method involves concentrating up to 200 mL of sample. The concentrated aliquot is then 

dry purged to remove water vapor prior to enteririg the chromatographic system. 

Method modifications taken to run these samples are summarized in the table below. Specific project 

requirements may over-ride the ATL modifications. 

Requirement TO-3 ATL Moiiifications 

Daily Calibration Standard 

Frequency, 

Prior to sample 

analysis and every 4-6 

hrs 

Prior to sample analysis and after the anal3^ical batch 

</= 20 samples. 

Initial Calibration Calculation 4-point calibration 

using a linear 

regression model 

5-point calibration using average Response Factor 

Initial Calibration Frequency Weekly When daily calibration standard recovery is outside 75 -

125 %, or upon significant changes to procedure or 

instrumentation 

Moisture Control Nation system Sorbent system 

Minimum Detection Limit 

(MDL) 

Calculated using the 

equation DL = A+3.3S, 

where A is intercept of 

calibration line and S 

is the standard 

deviation of at least 3 

reps of low level 

standard 

40CFRPt. 136 App. B, 

Preparation of Standards Levels achieved 

through dilution of gas 

mixture 

Levels achieved through loading various volumes of the 

gas mixture 

Receiving Notes 

The Chain of Custody (COC) was not relinquished properly. An incorrect date was provided by the 

field sampler; 

Analvtical Notes 

There were no analytical discrepancies. 

Page 3 of 12 
o 

LTD, 

Laboratory Services Since 1989 

Definition of Data Qualifying Flags 

Seven quahfiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicate as follows: 

B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit. 

J - Estimated value. 

E - Exceeds instrument calibration range. 

S - Saturated peak. 

Q - Exceeds quality control limits, 

U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the detection limit. 

M - Reported value may be biased due to apparent matrix interferences. 

File extensions may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates 

as follows: 

a-File was requantified 

b-File was quantified by a secbnd column and detector 

rl-File was requantified for the purpose of reissue 

Page 4 of 12 
LTD. 

Laboratary Services Since iM$ 

Summary of Detected Compounds 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

O 

CUent Sample ID: 248-SVE-llS 

Lab ID#: 1101142-OlA 

Compound 

Rot. Limit 

(ppmv) 

Rpt. Limit 

(ug/L) 

Amount 

(ppmv) 

Amount 

(ug/L) 

Benzene 0.0024 0.0077 0.030 0.097 

Toluene 0.0024 0.0091 0.010 0:040 , 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.0024 0.0087 0.032 0.12 , 

TPH (C5+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to Gasoline 0.060 0.25 12 49 

C2-C4 Hydrocarbons ref. to Gasoline 0.060 0.25 28 120 

Client Sample ID: 248-HVE-6S 

Lab ID#: lion42-02A 

Compound 

Rpt. Limit 

(ppmv) 

Rpt. Limit 

(ug/L) 

Amount 

(ppmv) 

Amount 

(ug/L) 

Benzene 0.094 0.30 7.0 22 

Toluene 0.094 0.35 3.0 11 

Ethyl Benzene 0.094 0.41 0.10 0.45 

Total Xylenes 0.19 0.82 0.60 2.6 • 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.094 0.34 4.4 16 

TPH (C5+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to Gasoline 2.4 9.6 1200 4900 

C2-C4 Hydrocarbons ref. to Gasoline 2.4 9.6 1700 6900 

Page 5 of 12 
t.aboratoty SetyiCB^ Since i0&9 

Client Sample ID: 248-SVE-llS 

Lab ID#: 1101142-01A 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

File Name: d011311 Date of Collection: 1/6/11 2:00:00 PM 

Dil. Factor: 2.42 Date of Analysis: 1/13/11 01:51PM 

Rot. Limit Rpt. Limit Amount Amount 

Compound (ppmv) (ug/L) (ppmy) (ug/L) 

Benzene 0.0024 0.0077 0.030 0.097 

Toluene 0.0024 0.0091 0.010 0.040 

Ethyl Benzene 0.0024 0.010 Not Detected Not Detected 

Total Xylenes 0.0048 0.021 Not Detected Not Detected 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.0024 0.0087 0.032 0.12 

TPH (C5+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to 0.060 0.25 12' 49 

Gasoline 

C2-C4 Hydrocarbons ref. to 0.060 0.25 28 120 

Gasoline 

' Container Type: 1 Liter Summa Canister 

Method 

Surrogates VoRecovery Limits 

Fluorobenzene (PID) 101 75-125 

Fluorobenzene (FID) 108 75-150 

Page 6 of 12 
Labort^mry^S^ 

CUent Sample ID: 248-HVE-6S 

Lab ID#: 1101142-02A 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

File Name: d011313 Date of Collection: 1/6/11 2:30:00 PM 

Dil. Factor: 94.0 Date of Analysis: 1/13/11 03:14 PM 

Rpt. Limit Rpt. Limit Amount Amount 

Compound (ppmv) (ug/L) (ppmv) (ug/L) 

Benzene 0.094 0.30 7.0 22 

Toluene 0.094 0.35 3.0 11 

Ethyl Benzene 0.094 0.41 0.10 0.45 

Total Xylenes 0.19 0.82 0.60 2.6 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.094 0.34 4.4 16 

TPH (C5+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to 2.4 9,6 1200 4900 

Gasoline 

C2-C4 Hydrocarbons ref. to 2.4 9.6 1700 6900 

Gasoline 

Container Type: 1 Liter Summa Canister 

Method 

Surrogates % Recovery Limits 

Fluorobenzene (PID) 99 75-125 

Fluorobenzene (FID) 108 75-150 

Page 7 of 12 
Client Sample ID: Lab Blank 

Lab ID#: 1101142-03A 

File Name: d011308 Date of Collection: NA 

Dil. Factor: 1.00 DateofAnalysis: 1/13/11 11:10 AM 

Compound 

Rpt. Limit 

(ppmv) 

Rpt. Limit 

(ug/L) 

Amount 

(ppmv) 

Amount 

(ug/L) 

Benzene 0.0010 0.0032 Not Detected Not Detected 

Toluene 0.0010 0.0038 Not Detected Not Detected 

Ethyl Benzene 0.0010 0.0043 Not Detected Not Detected 

Total Xylenes 0.0020 0.0087 Not Detected Not Detected 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.0010 0.0036 Not Detected Not Detected 

TPH (C5+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to 0:025 0.10 Not Detected Not Detected 

Gasoline 

C2-C4 Hydrocarbons ref. to 0.025 0.10 Not Detected Not Detected 

Gasoline 

Container Type: NA - Not Applicable 

Method 

Surrogates %Recovery Limits 

Fluorobenzene (PID) 100 75-125 

Fluorobenzene (FID) 110 75-150 

Page 8 of 12 
'S tm, 

L&bamtory Serytcei^ Sincst 19&9 

CUent Sample ID: LCS 

Lab ID#: 1101142-04A 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

File Name: 

Dil. Factor: 

dOI1304b 

1.00 

Date of Collection 

Date of Analysis: 

: NA 

1/13/11 09:21 AM 

Compound %Recovery 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl Benzene 

Total Xylenes 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 

96 

91 

85 

99 

92 

Container Type: NA -

Surrogates 

Not Applicable 

% Recovery 

Method 

Limits 

Fluorobenzene (PID) -105 75-125 

Page 9 of 12 
iTOXiCSLTD. 

Laboratoty S«/yices Since i&B9 

Client Sample ID: LCSD 

Lab ID#: 1101142-04AA 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

File Name: 

Dil. Factor: 

d011318b 

1.00 

Date of Collection: NA 

Date of Analysis: 1/13/11 06:24 PM 

Compound % Recovery 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl Benzene 

Total Xylenes 

Methyl tert-butyl ether 

95 

89 

82 

98 

91 

Container Type: NA -

Surrogates 

Not Applicable 

%Recovery 

Method 

Limits 

Fluorobenzene (PID) 95 75-125 

Page 10 of 12 
y 

TOXICS um 

Laboratory Services Since i989 

Client SamplelD: LCS 

Lab ID#: 1101142-04B 

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-3 GC/PID/FID 

File Name: d011303 

Dil. Factor: 1,00 

Date of Collection: NA 

DateofAnalysis: 1/13/11 08:48 AM 

Compound %Recovery 

TPH (C2+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to 

Gasoline 

101 

Container Type: NA - Not Applicable 

Surrogates 

Method 

%Recovery Limits 

Fluorobenzene (FID) 110 75-150 

Page 11 of 12 
y 

Labbrettory Sef%fices Since i0B9 

Client Sample ID: LCSD 

Lab ID#: 1101142-04BB 

File Name: d011317 Date of Collection: NA 

Dil. Factor: 1.00 DateofAnalysis: 1/13/11 05:51 PM 

Compound %Recovery 

TPH (C2+ Hydrocarbons) ref. to 106 

Gasoline 

Container Type: NA - Not Applicable 

Method 

Surrogates %Recovery Limits 

Fluorobenzene (FID) 111 75-150 

Page 12 of 12 
ffl o tu S r~ T— =: cn • 

y-.in 

< o ^: DC S ^ < < 2 o £ 

| s | 

tt o o m w 3o 

D ) CD Q -

O 0 0 g §1

1 s l . =5 Q w « 

''• CD.. 

O-

(0 

CO' .2 

N 

•o 

c 

1 CO 

9 « 

<,i 

VP 3 

5 a> f t 

^ tr g • 

tu c 12 a. o cf o CO 

ra <i> ;= o ° o 

-r,-<x>. p-1 S o 0) w s " nJ to l a ^ *= td E £ S ^ o T3 ^ a £0 E (D o ~

-

td E £ ^ 1 S •§ •- H 

Z o 2 1 D,.S ° 

— .!2 T3 to S c 

O £ ,9> « to E '5 . 

5= c ^ "5 ~ .Q. 

I- 2 E =5; y V-

CD ^ t te CO 

•E o CO C J= 

^ -fs < to £ 

C o x © ^ (0 to o £ "5 . 

o 

Sg o 

E 

CC CO to 

~ o 

to ^ 05 . S co o 

S 1 

CO 

3 CT 

<1> 

ff (U 0) >. (0 

c 

< 

c 

o 

o .c 

o 

O O °3 

c CQ 

O 

o 

£ (0 CO <u 

ill 

4-

cr- CO CO <0 

I 01 

o 

I 

oo 

II 

CO •> V) 

U 

> a: 

irk " 

5^ 

1 -

(0 

Q - D < ^ V CC 

C^4 

5 

CO w c 

-J 3 O 
State of Utah 

GARY R. HERBERT 

Governor 

GREG BELL 

Lieutenant Governor 

Department of 

Environmental Quality 

Amanda Smith 

E.xecutive Director 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY 

Bryce C. Bird 

Director 

DAQE-GN144300001-11 

No date entered 

Courtney Stephens 

City of St. George 

3780 South 1550 West 

St. George, UT 84790 

Dear Mr. Stephens : 

RE: Notice of Intent for Installation of a new Soil Vapor Extraction System at the City of St. George 

Wastewater Treatment Plant 

Project Number: N144300001 

We have reviewed your Notice of Intent submitted November 8, 2011, regarding the installation of a new 

soil vapor extraction (SVE) system to remediate the impacted soils from the City of St. George 

Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 3780 South 1550 West, St. George, Washington County. This 

operation shall be done in a way to ensure that the actual emissions of volatile organic compounds 

(VOCs) do not exceed 5 tons/year, in accordance with R307-401-9 ofthe Utah Administrative Code 

(UAC). Also, the level of any individual hazardous air pollutant (HAP) shall not exceed the toxic 

screening levels Hsted in R307-410-5(1 )(d). 

Emissions estimates of VOC shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with EPA document SW846, test 8260c or 8261 A, or the most recent revision of either method. Emissions estimates of HAPs 

shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with EPA document SW-846, test 802IB, or the most 

recent revision of that method. Other test methods may be approved by the Executive Secretary. Initial 

test samples shall be drawn on system startup. Additional test samples shall be drawn on intervals of no 

less than twenty-eight days and no more than thirty-one days (i.e., monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly 

for the remainder ofthe first year, and semi-annually thereafter or as determined necessary by the 

Executive Secretary. Resuhs of the testing and calculated annual quantity of emissions of VOC and 

HAPs shall be submitted to the Executive Secretary, attention Minor Source Compliance section, within 

30 days of sampling. 

At the anticipated level of air emissions, this project will not require an approval order, but the project 

will have to meet the requirements as stated m the R307-401-15 UAC. Should the actual emissions of 

VOC or HAPs approach the thresholds of R307-401-9(1 )(a) or R307-410-5(1 )(d), the SVE system shall 

be shut down for the remainder of the year or until an approval order can be obtained from the Division of 

Air Quality. Also, please note that this letter in no way releases the owner or operator of the site from any 

liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, county, and city regulations. 

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT 

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 

Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 

www.deq.Utah.gov 

Printed on 100% recycled paper 
DAQE-GN 144300001-11 

Page 2 

The fee for issuing this letter is the cost, as authorized by the legislature, ofthe actual time spent by the 

review engineer and all other staff on the project. Payment should be sent to the Division of Air Quality 

upon receipt of the invoice. 

Thank you for informing the Division of Air Quality of this project. If you have any additional questions, 

please contact Tim DeJulis who may be reached at (801) 536-4012. 

Sincerely, 

Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary 

Utah Air Quality Board 

Timothy R Andrus, Manager 

New Source Review Section 

cc: Southwest Utah Public Health Department 
- I 

- E O iH y S 8 I 

ffl tJ 1? 

< ^ 5 S H <S <^ o < ^ w o c (0 3 

I 

O t/ S ^ 

X a. tt 

-ttji. 

„ C 

re 

- 5 ® LU § 

ffl 

0) s; 

- c S; 

C 

O 

CO' Z) 

O 

CD 

CO 

CD 

I-J!-

(0 CT 

.2 

(D O Q . < ^ Cl) 9? > 

> 

o 

j Q (0 

flS CD I s II II 

~ 

V m O O! 

Qi; ffl :;ffl^ i2 Leve

land 

o 

c 

> ' c CD 0 _ J +-' D ) o m enin 

(/) T — 

pie! 

ci) E 

SC! 

I-

sa 

< 

0) 

ro O tn CO _c 01 o Q . (A tn E T J o 0) 0) o ce ce 0) ex ex •Q. i _ o O o o To To tn 

— 

cy cr o (P tn 

II 

II 

II 

0) (0 o o 

13 tn tn (0 

2 E 

o o 2 CO o t II II I

I II § 1 (0 c: 

.2 Q. B tn 

o 

JC CO Q . Q . 

« CO l l I 8 I E 

- 2 o 

8'3 2. 

s i § = t B E =6 S II II II 

E 

CO O CD CO 

O 

> Q) Qc: X 

QE. O^ 9) ^ Q. E CL IO .5 1-£• to 

E 

E 

o a. -

5 > ^ 

c ts = 

JS 00 ^ 

CO 3 C/S 

3 i 

E ^ 

O) CNJ o o 

m CD o o 

•<a- CD o o 

O O CD O 

in o o 

Q) £ CD CD O >. O CQ UJ _J 2 Z I- X H 

E E E..... 

-g ;o o g: OJ 

o S !5 <n E 

lO CO c i CD TCDCOOOCO-t-CDC O 

pcDOorot-i^c o 

OcpdoiricDCDC N 

tu £ cu <^ o o m Ol -J S z I- X IO ^03 : 

U is CL v> :)= 

O CD 00 O 00 

W TO ^ >. < 

P I ^ •« i i 

Q ^ ^ is 

i: O O (D tD 

a. o CO < -J -J 

CvJ CO O ico CO CO 

o ro "-^ CO to , to 

CD CO 9J- 1-^ CD CO 

O o o 

O CD ^ 

o o $ 

o o Z 

o oo o 

_ < 

OOO O o Z 

O O . O O O . 

OOOO O o 

T- O O CO O . .to o q c>J q q 

O CD CD p d CD 

^ £ Q. 3 5 TO 

CO LU _J S Z H X I-

:<£ > 

h- LU 
TABLE 5.6 

Frequency of Detection of VOC Analytes in Soil 

Building 620 

SWMU-58 Phase II RFI 

Vapor 

Tooele Army Depot, Utah 

Noof Noof Frequency of Maximum Mininimum 

Analyte Samples Detects Detection (ppbv)^' (ppbv) 

Toluene 21 2 10% 100 ND 

Garbon Tetrachloride 21 20 95% 5,800 ND 

1,1-DCA 21 12 57% 120 ND 

1,1-DCE 21 21 100% 28,000 4,400 

Methylene Chloride 21 2 10% 31 ND 

PCE 21 21 100% 79,000 12,000 

1,1,1-TCA 21 21 100% 5,700 1,200 

TCE 21 21 100% 3,900 94 

Chloroform 21 6 29% 34 ND 

ppbv = parts per billion volume. 
Tables 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal 

Former Sanitary Landflll 

Tooele Army Depot; Tooele; Utah 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed Mass 

Results Lab Results Results Flow Pounds [since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (scfm) per day sample) for period (pounds) (pounds) 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 18000 18 96000 77 0.7 0.0 Start-up 0.0 0.0 

111 

If 9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 19000 19 100000 76 0.7 1.8 78% 0.9 0.9 

. . «J • 9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 16000 16 88000 76 0.6 1.9 100% 1.2 : 2.1 

• . -.c . • 9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 19000 19 100000 74 0.7 2.1 100% 1.4 3.5 .•>••. •. f 9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 12000 12 63000 76 0.4 1.9 100% 0.8 4.3 

01 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 20000 20 110000 77 0.8 2.0 100% 1.5 5.9 

o 10/2/2010 ISLbFSG201 16000 16 87000 121 0.9 2.2 100% 2.0 7.9 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 18000 18 98000 122 1.1 1.7 100% 1.9 9.8 

• t- ••, 10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 13000 13 70000 125 0.8 1.1 100% 0.8 10.6 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 170 0.17 660 77 : 0.0 0.0 -

0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 170 0.17 690 : 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

. <U • 

•• .. • -JZ 

9/24/2010 ISLDFS6193 160 0.16 620 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

V 

o 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 150 0.15 590 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 110 0.11 460 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 . 

• --.: 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 180 0.18 700 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

• •'•'•*H". 

• 10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 130 0.13 - 520 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.1 

:•-'V;V •^ tH :: V/- 10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 140 0.14 580 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 130 0.13 510 125 0.0 1.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 450 0.45 1600 77 0.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 

0) 9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 - - - 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 300 0.3 1000 76 0.0 1.9 100% : 0.0 0.0 

J l 

u 9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 - - - 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

' 0) 9/28/2010 IS1.DFSG195 -

• -

- 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

• -. •,>,• 'QJ-..-

• • >:.- • 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 - - - 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 27 0.027 95 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 52 0.052 180 122 0.0 1-7 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 46 0.046 160 125 0.0 1-1 100% 0.0 0.0 

- 9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 5900 5.9 23000 77 0.0 0.0 - . . 

0.0 0.0 

- V : .. , 

. • "C :• • . 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 5000 5 20000 76 0.1 1.8 78% 0.2 0:2 

•Dichloroethi 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 4700 4.7 19000 76 0.1 1.9 100% 0.3 0.5 

•Dichloroethi 

9/26/2010 ISLDFS6194 6600 6.6 26000 74 0.2 2 1 100% 0.4 0.9 

•Dichloroethi 

9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 4200 4.2 17000 76 0.1 1.9 100% 0.2; 1.1 

•Dichloroethi 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 6200 6.2 25000 77 0.2 2.0 100% 0.4 1.4 

10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 5000 5 20000 121 0.2 2.2 100% 0.5 1.9 

. XJ • • 10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 4600 4.6 18000 122 0.2 1.7 100% 0.3 2.2 . XJ • • 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 3400 3.4 13000 125 0.1 1.1 100% 0.2 2.4 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 170 0.17 840 77 0.0 0.0 

• -

0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 170 0.17 830 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

ornr 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193' 140 0.14 680 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

ornr 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSGi94 150 0.15 730 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

: • g -. 9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 120 0.12 610 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

.r..-._o 9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 180 0.18 900 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

u 10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 140 0.14 690 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 160 0.16 780 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 120 0.12 600 125 0.0 1.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

9/20/2010 ISLDFS6191 170 0.17 940 77 0.0 0.0 -

0.0 0.0 

IU - -"-

.-.-c: - -

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 170 0.17 910 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

• (D 

x: - : • 9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 160 0.16 880 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

;«»:••. 

• 'S 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 170 0.17 920 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 150 0.15 820 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

;i-Trlcl 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 180 0.18 980 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.1 

;i-Trlcl 

10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 140 0.14 770 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.1 

•.• rt. .... 

• • iH . : 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 150 0.15 820 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 130 0.13 730 125 0.0 1.1 100% 0.0 0.1 
Table 3 Continued 

Number Totaj Mass : Cumulative 

Lab Lab of days Uptime Renioved lyiassv 

Results Lab Results Results ; Flow Pounds (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date ^ Sarnple lb (ppbv) (ppmv) (Mg/m') (scfm) pet day sample) for period (pounds) (pounds) 

^:^y;^yy 9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 110 0.11 700 77 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 120 0.12 790 : 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

_o 9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 100 0.1 640 : 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 etracH 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 110 0.11 670 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

etracH 

9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 96 0.096 610 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

rC 9/30/2010 ISLDFS6200 120 0.12 780 77 0.0 2.0 : 100% 0.0 0.0 

:•• ••>:•. • 0'. > - .;^10/2/201 ! 0 ISLDFSG201 98 0.098 620 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.1 

Q 10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 120 0.12 730 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 100 0.1 630 125 0.0 1.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 66 0.066 300 77 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 

opane 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 79 0.079 360 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

opane 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 73 0.073 340 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 71 0.071 330 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 52 0.052 240 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

. c . 

u 9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 90 0.09 410 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

O 10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 72 0.072 330 121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 81 0.081 370 122 ,0.0 1.7 100% , 0.0 0.0 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 68 0.068 310 : 125 0.0 1.1 100% . 0.0 0.0 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 

• - . • • 

77 0.0 0.0 

• - • • 

0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 - 76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

'^3' y 9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 70 0.07 260 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

C 9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 -

• - • .-

74 0.0 2.1 100% : 0.0 0.0 

9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 -

.• - - . •. • 

76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 - - . 

- • 

77 0.0 2.0 100% : 0,0 0.0 : 

10/2/2010 1SLDFSG201 

-. • 

. -

. • -

121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 -

• -

122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 -. - .- 125 0.0 i.l 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 120 0.12 830 77 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 140 0.14 920 76 0.0, 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

lylene 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 110 o:i i 750 76 0.0 1.9 : : 100% . 0.0 0.0 

lylene 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 180 0.18 1200 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

V 9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 100 0.1 710 76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 98 0.098 660 ; 77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.1 

. c 

u 10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 110 0.11 760 121 0.0 2.2 : 100% 0.0 0.1 

e 

•4-» ,• • • 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 120 0.12 820 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.1 

1? 10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 86 : 0.086 580 125 0.0 1.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

9/20/2010 ISLDFSG191 

•. - -• • 

- 77 0.0 0.0 

•• - • 

0.0 0.0 

9/22/2010 ISLDFSG192 

• -• . -... . • 

76 0.0 1.8 78% 0.0 0.0 

9/24/2010 ISLDFSG193 33 0.033 140 76 0.0 1.9 100% : 0.0 0.0 

-Xylen 

9/26/2010 ISLDFSG194 - - 74 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

-Xylen 

9/28/2010 ISLDFSG195 

• . -• - . 

76 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

m,p 

9/30/2010 ISLDFSG200 -

77 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

m,p 

10/2/2010 ISLDFSG201 -

• -

121 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/4/2010 ISLDFSG202 - - - 122 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/5/2010 ISLDFSG203 - 125 0.0 1.1 100%: 0.0 . 0,0 

Notes: 

Oniy analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table 4 

Laboratory Data and Mass Removal 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Nurriber Total Mass Cunriulative 

Lab of days Uptime Removed Mass 

Lab Results Lab Results Results Flow Pounds (since last percentage during period: ; Removed 

Date Samplei ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Hg/m^) (scfm) per day sample) for peribd (pounds) (pounds) 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 9000 9 48000 123 0.5 0.0 Start-up 0.0 0.0 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 7100 7.1 38000 120 0.4 2.0 100% 0.8 0.8 : 

10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 6000 6 32000 li20 0.3 2.0 100% 0.7 1.5 

• 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 6400 , 6.4 34000 121 0.4 2.1 100% 0.8 2.3 

10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 5600 5.6 30000 120 0.3 1.9 100% 0.6 , 2.9 

S " 10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 6400 6.4 34000 119 0.4 2.2 100% 0.8 3.7 

- £ 10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 9400 9.4 50000 ; 119 0.5- 1.8 100% 1.0 4.7 

10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 7000 7 38000 119 0.4 1.9 100% 0.8 5.4 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 8700 8.7 47000 122 0.5 0.9 100%;: 0.5 5.9 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 88 0.088 350 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

fl) 

' C 

10/8/2010 iSLDFSG207 100 0.1 390 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

0) 

> JZ 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 100 0.1 400 ' 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 : 0.0 

0) 

o 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 100 0.1 410 121 0.0 2.1 100% o.d: 0.0 

_o 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 83 0.083 330 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0.6 0.0 

10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 110 o.ii 440 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 120 0.12 480 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.1 , 

' i-T- « 10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 100 0.1 420 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0: 0.1 

-

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 120 0.12 480 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 -

• -

. - 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

. , c 10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 

• .- • 

-

• -

120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 : 

Rl 

' £ 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 

.- -

- • 

120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

O ; 10/12/2010 ISLDFSG2d8 - - 121 0.0 : 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 : 

O 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 

- • 

- - 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

,1-bicl 

10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 18 0.018 75 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

,1-bicl 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 21 0.021 86 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

l - l 10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 21 0.021 85 119 0.0 1.9 100% : 0.0 0.0 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 23 0.023 94 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

"•••..••oif^.- ypyi:^- 'ilWiff':^.: 'MS l^Syy& -: 

<u 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 15 0.015 61 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

c 

•- a> 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 19 0.019 75 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

01 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 22 0.022 86 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

. o 

o .* 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 28 0.028 110 121 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 . 

J Z 

u 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 24 0.024 97 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 10/16/2010 iSLDFSG219 35 0.035 140 119 O.O 2:2 100% 0.0 0.0 

rH 10/18/2010 iSLDFSG220 49 0.049 200 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 51 0.051 200 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 , 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 62 0.062 250 122 0.0 : 0.9 : 100% 0.0 .0.0 

^ 1 10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 240 0.24 1200 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0:0 0.0 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 220 0.22 1000 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

forrh 

10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 180 0.18 900 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

forrh 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 180 0.18 870 121 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

- , o 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 130 0.13 660 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.1 :^ 

10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 160 . 0.16 800 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 180 0.18 880 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 140 0.14 710 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.1 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 170 0.17 830 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0.0 0.1 
Table 4 Continued 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab of days Uptime Removed Mass 

Lab Results Lab Results Results Flow Pounds (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Mg/m') (scfm) per day sample) for period (pounds) (pounds) 

0) .. 

• c 

• ItJ •••. • 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 58 0.058 320 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

0) .. 

• c 

• ItJ •••. • 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 71 0.071 390 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

., •. JC ••• 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 82 0.082 440 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 89 0.089 490 . 121 0.0 2.1 100% 0,0 0.0 

•; •• O • • 

• - X . • • •: 

10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 72 0.072 390 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

. .. fl - . 

10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 100 0.1 540 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

- -• ^ : • 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 110 0.11 610 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0,1 

. ••. i-f .. 10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 100 0.1 560 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0,1 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 120 0.12 680 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0,0 0,1 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 240 0.24 1500 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0,0 0,0 

. • 01 ••• 

•a 10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 230 0.23 1500 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

- o • 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 230 0.23 1400 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0.1 

. -• .. 

- u -

- • ID.. 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 240 0.24 1500 121 0.0 2.1 100% 0,0 0.1 

01 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 190 0.19 1200 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.1 

• K 

• • c • 

10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 260 0.26 1600 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0,0 0.2 

.-..o-- •••.. 

. • -.g • . 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 290 0.29 1800 119 0.0 1.8 100% . 0,0 0,2 

IS • 10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 220 0.22 1400 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.2. 

10/21/2010 ISLDFS6236 290 0.29 1800 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0,0 0.2 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 - - 123 0.0 0.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 - - - 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 - - - 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

0) 10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 -

. - • 

-

121 0.0 2.1 100% 0,0 0.0 

• • . • o>.. 

•: o . . 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 22 0.022 81 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.0 

o • • . 

1- 10/16/2010 ISLDFSG219 

- • 

- - 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0,0 0.0 

10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 - -

- • 

119 0.0 1.8 100% 0,0 0.0 

10/20/2010 iSLDFSG221 - - - 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.0 

10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 - - -

'l22 0.0 0.9 100% 0,0 0.0 

(PCE) 

10/6/2010 ISLDFSG206 

- • • . 

-

- • 

123 0.0 0.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

(PCE) 

10/8/2010 ISLDFSG207 - - - 120 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

c -. 10/10/2010 ISLDFSG205 15 0.015 100 120 0.0 2.0 100% . 0:0 0.0 

•>. .• 

10/12/2010 ISLDFSG208 17 0.017 120 121 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

a> - 10/14/2010 ISLDFSG218 20 0.02 130 120 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.0 

o 10/16/2010 iSLDFSG219 15 0.015 100 119 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

. : • £ 

. •.: o • 10/18/2010 ISLDFSG220 43 0.043 290 119 0.0 1.8 100% 0,0 0.0 

: • • ' 

10/20/2010 ISLDFSG221 25 0.025 170 119 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

• H- . • 10/21/2010 ISLDFSG236 34 0.034 230 122 0.0 0.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

Hg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Tables 

CVEWTOOB..; 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Date Sample ID 

Laij 

Results 

(ppbv) 

Lab 

Results 

(ppmv) 

Lab 

Results 

(Mg/m') 

Flow 

(scfm) 

Pounds per 

day 

Number 

of days 

(since last 

sample) 

Uptime 

percentage 

for period 

Total Mass 

Removed 

during period 

(pounds) 

Cumulative 

Mass 

Removed 

(pounds) 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 46 0.046 250 108 0.0 0,0 Start-up 0,0 0.0 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 120 0.12 670 110 0.0 0,8 100% 0.0 0.0 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 260 0.26 1400 110 0.0 1,8 100% 0.0 0.0 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/3/2011 ISLDFS6255 450 0.45 2400 108 0,0 2,3 100% 0,1 0,1 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/5/2011 ISLDFSG256 580 0.58 3100 108 0.0 1,9 100% 0,1 0.1 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/7/2011 1SLDFSG259 880 0.88 4800 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0,1 0.2 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 1000 1 5500 110 0.1 2.1 100% 0,1 0.3 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 990 0.99 5300 110 0.1 2.0 100% 0,1 0.4 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 1500 1.5 8100 110 0,1 2.1 100% 0,2 0,6 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 32 0.032 120 108 0,0 0.0 0% 0.0 0,0 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 83 0.083 330 110 0,0 0.8 100% 0.0 0,0 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 140 0.14 540 110 0,0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/3/2011 ISLDFSG255 180 0.18 690 108 0,0 2.3 100% 0.0 0.0 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/5/2011 .ISLDFSG256 190 0.19 750 108 0,0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/7/2011 1SLDFSG259 220 0.22 880 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.1 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 220 0.22 860 110 0,0 2.1 100% 0,0 0.1 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 160 0.16 630 110 0.0 2:0 100% 0,0 0.1 

: •'lyl-Dichloroethene 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 :180 0.18 730 ilo 0,0 2,1 100% 0,0 0.1 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 44 0.044 180 108 0.0 0,0 0% 0,0 0.0 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 130 0.13 510 110 0.0 0,8 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 180 0.18 740 110 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

4/3/2011 ISLDFSG255 200 0.2 800 108 0,0 2.3 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

4/5/2011 ISLDFSG256 200 0.2 820 108 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0.1 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

4/7/2011 1SLDFS6259 210 0.21 850 110 0,0 2.0 100% 0,0 0,1 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 180 0.18 750 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0,0 0,1 

1,1-Dichloroethane; 1,1-Dichloroethane

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 150 0.15 610 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0,1 

; 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 160 0.16 660 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

Chloroform 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 

• -

-

108 0.0 0.0 0% : 0.0 0,0 

Chloroform 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 30 0.03 140 110 0,0 0.8 100% 0,0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 46 0.046 220 110 0,0 1.8 100% 0.0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/3/2011 ISLDFSG255 56 0.056 280 108 0.0 2.3 100% 0,0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/5/2011 ISLDFSG256 60 0.06 290 108 0.0 1.9 100% 0,0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/7/2011 ISLDFSG259 72 0.072 350 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 72 0.072 350 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0,0 0.0 

Chloroform 

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 64 0.064 310 110 0,0 2.0 100% 0,0 0,0 

Chloroform 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 72 0.072 350 110 0,0 2.1 100% 0.0 0,0 
Table 5 Continued 

bate Sample ID 

Lab 

Results 

(ppbv) 

Lab 

Results 

(ppmv) 

Lab 

Results 

(l»g/m') 

Flow 

(scfm) 

Pounds per 

day 

Number 

of days 

(since last 

sample) 

Uptime 

percentage 

for period 

Total Mass 

Removed 

during period 

(pounds) 

Cumulative : 

Mass 

Removed 

(pounds) 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 45 0.045 240 108 0.0 0.0 0% 0.0 0.0 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 120 0.12 660 110 0.0 0.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 180 0.18 990 110 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

4/3/2011 ISLDFSG255 210 0.21 1200 108 0.0 2.3 100% 0.0 0.0 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

4/5/2011 ISLDFSG256 220 0.22 1200 108 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.1 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

4/7/2011 ISLDFSG259 240 0.24 1300 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.1 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 240 0.24 1300 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

1,1,1-Trichloroethahe' 1,1,1-Trichloroethahe

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 190 0.19 1000 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.1 

' 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 220 0.22 1200 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.2 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

3/29/2011 ISLDFSG250 46 0.046 290 108 0.0 0.0 0% 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

3/30/2011 ISLDFSG253 140 0.14 850 110 0.0 0.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

4/1/2011 ISLDFSG254 240 0.24 1500 110 0.0 1.8 100%. 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

4/3/2011 ISLDFSG255 320 0.32 2400 108 0.0 2.3 100% 0.0 0.1 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

4/5/2011 ISLDFSG256 330 0.33 2100 108 0.0 1.9 100% : 0.0 0.1 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

4/7/2011 ISLDFSG259 450 0.45 2800 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0.1 0.2 

Carbon Tetrachloride 

4/9/2011 ISLDFSG260 420 0.42 2600 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0.1 0.2 

Carbon Tetrachloride Carbo

4/11/2011 ISLDFSG261 250 0.25 1600 110 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.3 

n Tetrachloride 

4/13/2011 ISLDFSG262 370 0.37 2300 110 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 :. 0.3 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by voiume 

pg/m' - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table 6 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed Mass 

Results Results Results Flow Pounds per (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Hg/m^) (scfm) day sample) for period (pounds) (pounds) 

.... 

4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 44000 44 240000 110 2.4, 0,0 Start-up 0.0 0.0 

. -:-- U • 4/15/2011. ISLDFSG270 51000 51 270000 110 2.7 0.7 100% 1.9 1.9 

• • tt» '.. . 4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 47000 47 250000 108 2.4 1.7 100% 4.0 5.9 

••. .0;' •. ••• " 4/19/2011 ISLDFSG273 62000 62 330000 110 3.3 2.5 100% 8.0 13,9 

• ••J:' . 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 32000 32 170000 107 1.6 2.1 97% 3.3 17,3 

S 4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 38000 38 200000 108 1.9 2.2 100% 4.2 21.5 

0 4/25/2011 ISLDFSG280 42000 42 220000 110 2.3 1.9 100% 4.3 25.8 

4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 43000 43 230000 110 2.3 1.9 100% 4.3 30.0 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 36000 36 200000 115 2.0 2.1 100% 4.0 34.0 

4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 73 0.073 290 110 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

-•;: o) -.'. 4/15/2011 ISLDFSG270 - - 110 0.0 0.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

0) -

•.. -.C:'- . 

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 - - - 108 -0.(J 1.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

0> 

0 4/19/2011 ISLDFSG273 -

• -

- 110 0.0 2.5 100% 0.6 . 0.0 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 - - 107 0.0 2.1 97% 6.6 0:0 

. -• • vw.'" 4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 -

• -

- 108 0.0 2.2 100% 6.6 0.0 

rt 4/25/2011 iSLDFSG280 - - - 110 0.0 1.9 100% 6.6 0.0 

.. ••.••.:--.rt-.-' ••• •' 4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 - - - 110 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 - - - 115 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

^ r ' ' ' . " , ' • ' 

0) 4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 82 0.082 320 110 0.0 0.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

0> 4/15/2011 ISLDFSG270 98 0.098 390 110 0,0 0.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

01 

0 -

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 93 0.093 370 108 6,0 1.7 106% 0.0 0.0 

., 0 4/19/2011 iSLDFSG273 130 0.13 500 110 0.0 2.5 100% - 0.0 0.0 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 - -

-• 

107 6.0 2,1 97% 0.0 0.0; 

0 

N 

4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 110 0.11 430 108 6,6 2,2 100% 0.6 • -' 0.0 

4/25/2011 ISLDFSG280 120 0.12 480 110 0,0 1,9 100% 6.6 0.0 

-: tz -. 

ID 

4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 120 0.12 490 110 0,0 1,9 100% 6.6 0.0 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 110 0.11 440 115 0,0 2,1 100% 6.6 0.1 

4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 21000 21 83000 110 0,0 0,0 100% 6,6 .0.0 

c 4/15/2011 iSLDFSG270 33000 33 130000 110 1:3 0,7 100% 6,9 0.9 

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 44000 44 170000 108 1,6 1,7 100% 2,7 : 3.6 

chloro 

4/19/2011 iSLDFSG273 74000 74 290000 110 2,9 2,5 100% 7.1 10.7 

chloro 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 59000 59 240000 107 2,2 2.1 97% 4.6 15.3 

0 4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 60000 60 240000 108 2.3 2.2 100% 5,6 20.4 

rt 4/25/2011 ISLDFSG280 62000 62 240000 110 2.5 1.9 100% 4,7 25.1 

O' 4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 64000 64 250000 110 2.5 1-9 100% 4,6 29.7 O' 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 61000 61 240000 115 2.5 2.1 100% 5.1 34.8 

4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 160 0.16 760 110 0.0 6.0 100% 0,6 0.0 

4/15/2011 ISLDFSG270 170 • 0.17 840 110 0.0 0.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

for

m • 

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 130 0.13 650 108 0,0 1.7 100% 0,0 0.0 

for

m • 

4/19/2011 ISLDFSG273 180 0.18 890 . 110 0.6 2.5 100% 6,0 0.0 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 130 0.13 660 107 6.0 2.1 97% 0,0 0:1 

•"•2:'•:•••••. 

4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 120 0.12 580 108 6,6 2,2 100% 0.0 0.1 •"•2:'•:•••••. 

4/25/2011 ISLDFSG280 120 0.12 580 110 6,6 1,9 100% 0.0 0.1 

4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 110 0.11 530 110 6,6 1,9 100% 0.0 6.1 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 100 0.1 ; 500 115 0,0 2,1 100% 0,0 6.1 
Table 6 Continued 

Number Total Mass Cumu\ative 

Lab Lab Lab C|fdays Uptime Removed • Mass 

Results • Results Results Flow Pounds per (s|nce |iast percentage during period Removed 

Date ; Sarnple ID (ppbv) (ppmv) iMg/m') (scfm) day sarnple) : for period (pounds) (pounds) 

4/14/2611 ISLDFSG269 310 0.31 1700 110 0.0 0.0 106% 0.0 0.0 

c 

ns 

4/15/2611 ISLPFSG270 300 0.3 1600 110 0.0 0.7 166% 0.0 0.0 

OJ ^ 

4/17/2011 iSLDFSG271 240 0.24 1300 108 0.0 1.7 100% 6.6 0.0 

:hloro< 

4/19/2011 ISLDFSG273 330 0.33 1800 110 0.0 2.5 100% 6.6 0.1 

:hloro< 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 240- 0.24 1300 107 0.0 2.1 97% 6.6 0.1 

4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 230 0.23 1300 108 0.0 2.2 100% 6.6 0.1 

rt 4/25/2011 iSLDFSG280 250 0,25 1300 110 o:6 1.9 106% 6.6 ' 0.2 

rt 4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 250 0.25 1400 110 6.6 1.9 166% 6.0 0.2 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 200 0.2 1100 115 6.0 2.1 166% 0.0 0.2 

4/14/2011 ISLDFSG269 1200 1.2 8400 110 0.0 0.0 160% 0.0 0.0 

01 

- c ^ 4/15/2011 ISLDFSG270 1200 1.2 8300 110 0.1 : 0.7 100% 0.1 0.1 

•>• 

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271 1100 1.1 7200 108 0.1 1.7 100% • 0.1 0.2 

01 4/19/2011 iSLDFSG273 1000 1 6900 110 6.1 2.5 100% 0.2 0.3 

p ^ 

o 

4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 ;160 0.16 1100 107 6.6 2.1 97% 0.0 0.4 • 

. c 

u 4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 410 0.41 2800 108 6.6 : 2.2 100% 0.1 0.4 

c 4/25/2011 1SLDFSG280 700 0.7 4800 110 0.0 1.9 100% 0.1 0.5 

4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 850 0.85 5766 110 0.1 : 1.9 100% 0.1 . 0.5 

4/29/2011 ISLDFSG287 510 0.51 3566 115 0.0 2.1 100% , 6.1 0.7 

4/14/2011 " ISLDFSG269 

• • 

110 0.0 0.0 100% ; 6.6 0.0 

4/15/2011 ISLDFSG270 82 0.082 266 110 -. 0.0 0.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

4/17/2011 ISLDFSG271; 140 6.14 446 108 0.0 1.7 100% 0.6 0:0 

c 4/19/2011 ISLDFSG273 150 6.15 476 110 ; o:o 2.5 100% 6.6 0.0 

, c 4/21/2011 ISLDFSG278 95 6.695 366 107 0.0 2.1 97% 0.0 ; 0.0 

CO ' 4/23/2011 ISLDFSG279 120 6.12 370 108 o;o 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

4/25/2011 ISLDFSG280 130 6.13 410 110 0.0 : 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

4/27/2011 ISLDFSG282 140 6.14 440 110 0.0 1:9 100% 0.0 0.1 

" 4/29/2"6ll ISLDFSG287 120 0.12 390 115 0.0 2.1 100% 6.6 0.1 

' -:'W-''''::^I'-i^;rf:'' 

Notes 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv r part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m' - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table? 

Laboratory Results ahd Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime i Removed Mass 

Results Results Results Flow Pounds per (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Mg/m^) (scfm) day sample) forperiod (pounds) (pounds) 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 : 460 0.46 2500 112 0.0 6.0 •' ."' 6.6 0.0 : 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 4100 4.1. 22000 112 0.2 6.8 100% 6.2 ; 0.2 

0> 8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 6400 6.4 34000 112 0.3 : 1.9 100% 0.7 0.9 

_o; 8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 7800 7.8 42000 112 0.4 2.0 100% \; 0.8 1.7 

.c" 8/29/2611 ISLDFSG430 9000 9 48000 112 0.5 2.6 100% 1.6 2.7 

8/31/2611 ISLDFSG432 6800 6.8 37O0O 112 0.4 2.1 ,100% 0.8 3.5 

_o 

.c 9/2/2011 ISLDFS6433 11000 11 61000 112 0.6 1.9 106% 1.1 4.6 

9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 11000 11 61000 112 0.6 2.1 166% 1.3 5.8 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 18066 18 96000 112 1.0 2.1 166% 2.0 7.9 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 - - . 

• . -

112 0.0 . 6.6 

. • •. - • 

0.0 0.0 

- 0) 

c 

8/23/2611 ISLDFSG419 . -

-• 

112 0.0 6.8 160% • 0.0 : 0.0 

Olr 

f 8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 29 0.029 120 112 6.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

0> 8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 34 0.034 140 112 0.0 2.6 100% 0.0 0.0 

" o 8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 45 0.045 180 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

"5 \ 

9, 

" rt \ 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 42 0.042 160 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 "5 \ 

9, 

" rt \ 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 66 0.06 240 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0. 0.0 

rt 9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 53 0.053 210 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 83 0.083 330 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 

• -•• 

- - 112 0.0 0.0 

: • - • 

0.0 0.0 

' 0) 

C i -

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 

. .- • -• 

112 0.0 0.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

<D 

. jc: 8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 15 0.015 62 112 0.0 1-9 100% 0.6 0.0 

tt 

o 8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 - . - 112 0.0 2.0 100% 6.6 0.0 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 15 0.015 62 112 0.0 2.0 100% 6,6 0.0 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 -

.. •-

112 0,0 2.1 106% 6.6 0.0 

• :. : • • rt.. . 9/2/2011 ISLDFS6433 20 0.02 79 112 0.6 1.9 166% 6.0 ; 6.0 : . 

9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 18 0.018 72 112 6.6 2.1 166% 6.6 0.0 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 

: - • 

- - 112 0.0 2.1 166% 6.0 6.0 :: 

o» 

c 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 

--• . • -

112 0.0 0.0 .... - 6.6 0.0 

01 

sz 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 

• - • 

- - 112 0.0 0.8 100% 6.6 0.0 

01 . 

o 

8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 

• -

-.- 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.6 0.0 

o 8/27/2011 ISLPFSG421 18 0.018 70 112 0.0 : 2.0 100% 6.6 0.0 . :2-Dich 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 27 0.027 110 112 0.0 2.0 100% 6.6 0.0 

:2-Dich 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432i 23 0.023 90 : 112 o:o 2,1 100% 0.0 0.0 

. rt ' 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 44 0.044 180 : 112 O-O 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

C • 

RI 9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 42 0.042 170 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

yy^s£:-^:i' ,9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 68 0.068 270 112 0.0 2.1 100% : 0.0 0.0 

i^iW':^^M^-:-iiM;:M:'•-:W.-< -%. .i-i^:--.-i'-'^'r'}:-:^-. -fe-'.ii--. W-'^' y-.S:: ::'i^.^- .si:'- iS'-- -'-tj:•, 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 : 21 0.021 100 112 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0,0 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 36 0.036 186 112 0.0 0.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

form: 

8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 47 0.047 236 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.0 0,0 

form: 

8/27/2011 ISLDFSG42i 46 0.046 220 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

rhjoro 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 44 0.044 210 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0,0 

rhjoro 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 36 0.036 170 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0,0 

9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 49 0.049 240 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0,0 

9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 43 0.043 210 112 0.0 2.1 ; 100% 0.0 0,0 ; 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 59 0.059 290 112 0.0 2.1 ;ie6% 0.0 0.0 

0} 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 100 0.1 410 112 0.0 0.0 

•. - • 

0.0 0.0 

c 

•i QJ' 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 680 0.68 2706 112 0.0 0.8 160% 0.0 0.0 

.c 

01 

8/^5/2011 ISLDFSG420 2200 2.2 8900 112 6.1 1.9 166% 0.2 6.2 

••• o, 

o 

8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 3600 3.6 14000 112 0.1 2.0 166% 0.3 0.5 .: 

JZ 8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 5600 5.6 22000 112 0.2 2.0 : 166% 0.5 0.9 

a 8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 5000 5 20000 112 0.2 2.1 :166% 0.4 1.3 

IN 

rt 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 10060 10 40000 112 0.4 1.9 : 166% 0.8 2.1 

U 9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 ioooo 10 42000 112 0.4 2.1 166% 0.9 3.0 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 18000 18 71000 112 0.7 2.1 166% .1.5 4.4 

•^j;::^': ^^•:V~.^';.'.^::;:r ' V:^;::'-:.:^--' •7>. ' :':V^^.."-'/i::': ...V^::. :'-:^.. ;:-." :':^:'.''-.^..:^ :: • • ,>^:::.r'r^-; 
Table 7 Continued 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed Mass 

Results Results Results Flovy Pounds per (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Ug/m!) (scfm) day sample) forperiod (pounds) (pounds) 

' OJ 

• £•:••••>• • 

,. ...... 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 -

- • 

112 0.0 6.6 

• -

0.0 0.0 

' OJ 

• £•:••••>• • 

,. ...... 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 28 0.028 156 112 0.0 6.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

Trichloroethi 

8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 55 0.055 300 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

Trichloroethi 

8/27/2011- ISLDFSG421 73 0.073 400 112 6.6 2.0 100% 0.0 -0.0 

Trichloroethi 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 91 0.091 500 112 6.6 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

Trichloroethi 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 84 0.084 460 112 6.6 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

rt 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 130 0.13 730 112 6.6 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

rt 9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 110 0.11 610 112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 166 0,16 890 112, 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.1 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 - : 

- • 

- 112 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 

01 • 

•a 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 - -

•-

112 0.0 0.8 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 15 0.015 93 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 etracf 

8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 16 0.616 100 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

etracf 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 18 6.618 110 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 ^ 

-r^.-- ...... 

- c 8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 19 6.019 120 112 0.0 2.1 100% 6.6 0.0 

XI 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 20 0.02 130 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 • 

IB 

O 9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 19 0.619 120 112 0.0 2.1 : 100% 6.6 6.0 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 - -

• - • 

112 0.0 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

V.^ 'i- ri:'- 'V' .• 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 

- • . . .- • 

112 0.0 0.0 

• •. -

0.0 6.0 . 

0) -

' c 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 210 0.21 1400 112 0.0 0.8 100% 6.6 0:0 

8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 260 0.26 1700 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.0 0.0 

01 8/27/2011 ISLbFSG421 320 0.32 2200 112 0.0 2.0 100% 6.0' 0.1 ichloro 

8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 380 0.38 2600 112 0.0 2.0 100% : 0.1 0.1 

ichloro 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 260 0.26 1800 112 6.6 2.1 100% 6,6 0,2 

C 9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 500 0.5 3400 112 6:6 : 1.9 100% 6.1 0.2 

9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 520 0.52 3500 112 6.6 2.1 100% 6,1 0.3 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 720 0,72 4900 112 6.1 2.1 100% 6.1 0,4 : 

8/22/2011 ISLDFSG418 

- • -.• 

112 6.6 0.0 

• • -

0.0 0,0 

8/23/2011 ISLDFSG419 - -. 

• . - • • 

112 6.0 0.8 100% 6.6 0,0 , 

8/25/2011 ISLDFSG420 

•' -

- - 112 6.6 1.9 100% 6.0 6,0 

o> 

C ' 

8/27/2011 ISLDFSG421 16 0,016 50 112 0.0 2.0 100% ; 0.0 0.0 

c 8/29/2011 ISLDFSG430 24 0,624 78 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

• - ot . 

ea 

8/31/2011 ISLDFSG432 21 6.621 ;68 112 0.0 2.1 100% : 0,0 0.0 

9/2/2011 ISLDFSG433 , 4 8 6.048 150 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/4/2011 ISLDFSG435 52 0.052 170 112 6.6 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

9/6/2011 ISLDFSG436 85 0.685 270 112 6.6 2.1 100% 0.0 0.0 

Notes 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m' - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Tables 

"XVEWjiir ^ 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Date/Time Sample ID 

Lab 

Results 

(ppbv) 

Lab 

Results 

(ppmv) 

Lab 

Results 

(Mg/m3) 

Flow 

(scfm) 

Removal 

Rate 

(lbs/day) 

Numberof 

days (since last 

sample) 

Uptime 

percentage for 

period 

Total 

Mass 

Removed 

during 

period 

(pounds) 

Cumulative 

Mass 

Removed 

(pounds) 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/16/1114:43 ISLDFSG308 1100 1.1 5800 119 0.1 0.0 -

0.0 6.6 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 2000 2 11000 119 0.1 1.0 100% 0.1 6.1 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/19/110:00 ISLDFSG315 2100 2.1 11000 112 0.1 1.3 100% 0.1 6.3 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFS6316 1500 1,5 8060 112 0.1 2.5 100% 0.2 6.5 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFSG323 1800 1.8 9500 115 0.1 1.9 78% 0.2 0.6 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFS6328 2500 2.5 14000 112 0.1 2.1 98% 0.3 6.9 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 3000 3 16000 112 6.2 1.9 100% 0.3 1.2 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/29/1115:00 1SLDFSG331 3000 3 16000 112 6.2 2.2 100% 0.4 1.6 

Trichloroethylene.(TeE) 

5/31/1115:36 ISLDFSG332 2800 2,8 15000 110 6.1 2.0 98% 0.3 1.9 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/16/1114:43 ISLDFSG308 - - - 119 6.6 0.0 

• -• 

0.0 6.6 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 46 0.046 180 119 6.0 1.0 100% 0.0 6.0 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/19/110:00 ISLDFSG315 59 0.059 230 112 0.0 1.3 100% 0.6 . 6.6 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFSG316 44 0.044 170 112 0.0 2.5 100% 0.6 6.6 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFSG323 52 0,052 200 115 0.0 1.9 78% 0.0 0.0 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFS6328 59 0,059 240 112 0.0 2.1 98% 0.0 0.0 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 73 0.073 290 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.0 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/29/1115:00 ISLDFSG331 95 0.095 380 112 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

: 1,1-Dichloroethene i 

5/31/1115:36 ISLDFSG332 70 0.07 280 110 0.0 2.0 98% 0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/16/1114:43 ISLDFSG308 - - - 119 0.0 0.0 -

0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 25 6.025 126 119 0.0 1.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/19/110:00 ISLDFSG315 27 0:027 130 112 0.0 1.3 100% 0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFSG316 20 0.02 100 112 0.0 2.5 100% 0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFS6323 20 0.02 98 115 0.0 1.9 78% 0.0 6.0 

: Chloroform 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFSG328 28 0.028 140 112 • 0.0 2.1 98% 0.0 6.0 

: Chloroform 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 30 0,03 . 140 112 6.6 1.9 100% 0.0 0.6 

: Chloroform 

5/29/1115:00 ISLDFSG331 34 0.634 160 112 6.6 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

: Chloroform 

5/31/1115:36 ISLDFSG332 32 0.032 160 110 0.0 2.0 98% 0.0 0.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/16/1114:43 ISLDFS6308 22 0.022 120 119 6.6 0.0 -

0.0 0.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 36 0.036 200 119 0.6 1.0 100% 0.0 0.0 . Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/19/11 0:00 ISLDFSG315 41 0.041 220 112 0.0 1.3 100% 0.0 6.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFSG316 30 0.03 150 112 0.0 2.5 100% 0.0 0.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFSG323 34 0.034 190 115 0.0 1.9 78% 0.0 6.6 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFSG328 42 0.042 230 112 0.0 2.1 98% 0.6 0.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 50 0.05 280 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 6.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 5/29/1115:00 ISLDFSG331 64 0.064 350 112 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

. Ot - C 

• .10 ••• • 

.JC- ••: 

, o 

o - -

-. - .c 

- . - . ^u. 

I7-

.•. - .rt • 

•. rt • 

,. -rt:,.' 

5/31/1115:36 ISLDFSG332 48 0.048 260 110 0.0 2.0 98% 0.0 0.0 

. • -. - - .'"^.• ',.:• .'• .• . -: :•:'-•:• • -
Table 8 Continued 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

Date/Time 

5/16/1114:43 

Sample ID 

ISLDFSG308 

Lab 

Results 

(ppbv) 

Lab 

Results 

(ppmv) 

Lab 

Results 

(Hg/m3) 

Flow 

(scfm) 

Removal 

Rate 

(lbs/day) 

Number of 

days (since last 

sample) 

0.6 

Uptime 

percentage for 

period 

Total 

Mass 

Removed 

during 

period 

(pounds) 

Cumulative 

Mass 

Removed 

(pounds) 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

Date/Time 

5/16/1114:43 

Sample ID 

ISLDFSG308 

Lab 

Results 

(ppbv) 

-

Lab 

Results 

(Hg/m3) 

119 0.0 

Number of 

days (since last 

sample) 

0.6 

Uptime 

percentage for 

period 

0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 23 0.023 150 119 0.0 1.6 106% 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/19/110:00 ISLDFSG315 30 0.03 190 112 0.0 1.3 100% 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFSG316 18 0.018 120 112 0.0 2.5 100% 0.0 0.0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFSG323 22 6.622 140 115 0.0 1.9 78% 0.0 0,0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFSG328 24 6.024 150 112 0.0 2.1 98% 0.0 0,0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 31 0.031 200 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0,0 

Carbon Tetrachloride: Carbo

5/29/1115:00 ISLDFSG331 49 0.049 310 112 0.0 2.2 100% 0.0 0.0 

n Tetrachloride: 

5/31/1115:36 1SLDFSG332 30 0.03 190 110 0.0 2.6 98% 0,0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/16/1114:43 ISLDFSG308 18 0.018 120 119 0.0 0.0 -

0,0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/17/1115:52 ISLDFSG314 26 0.026 170 119 0.0 1.0 100% 0,0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/19/11 0:00 ISLDFSG315 35 0.035 240 112 0.0 1.3 100% 0,0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/21/1111:49 ISLDFSG315 23 0.023 160 112 0.6 2.5 106% 0.0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/23/1110:30 ISLDFSG323 31 0.031 210 115 6.6 1,9 78% 0.0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/25/1112:03 ISLDFSG328 47 0.047 320 112 0,0 2.1 98% 0.0 0,0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/27/1110:39 ISLDFSG329 65 0.065 440 112 0,0 1.9 160% 0.0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/29/1115:00 ISLDFSG331 50 0.05 320 112 0,0 2,2 100% 0.0 0.0 

Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 

5/31/1115:36 ISLDFSG332 49 0.049 340 110 0,0 2,0 98% 0.0 0.0 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table 9 ^ 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landflll 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Number Total Mass 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed Cumulative^ 

Results Results : Results Flow Pounds per (since liast percentage during period Mass Removed 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (pg/m-j (scfm) day sample) forperiod (pounds) V (pounds) 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 46000 46 250000 112 2.5 

• -

1.0 

• • • - • 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/4/2011 ISLDFSG358 39000 39 210000 112 2.1 0.8 1.0 1.6 1.6 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/6/2011 ISLDFSG369 38000 38 210000 112 2.1 2.0 1.0 4.1 5.8, 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 35000 35 190000 112 1.9 2,1 1.0 4.1 9.9 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/10/2011 ISLDFS6376 54000 54 290000 112 2.9 1.7 1.0 . .5.1 14.9 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 45000 45 240000 112 2.4 2.0 1,0 4.8 19.7 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 43000 43 : 230000 112 2.3 2.2 1,0 5.0 24.7 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 42000 42 230000 112 2:3 2.1 1,0 4.8 29.5 

UJ . 

£ 

flj* 

c 

01 >. 

f 

•: ; a!-:. 

o 

f 7/18/2011 ISLDFSG380 43000 43 230000 112 2.3 1.8 1,0 4,2 : 33.6 14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 -

: 112 0.0 

- • 

1.0 

. -• •' • • • .;. 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/4/2011 lSLbFSG368 112 0.0 0,8 1.0 0.0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/6/2011 ISLDFSG369 

• -. 

112 0.0 2,0 1.0 0,0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 110 0^11 420 112 0.0 2.1 1.0 0,0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 140 0.14 540 112 0.0 1,7 1,0 0,0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/12/2011 iSLDFSG377 130 0.13 520 112 0.0 2.0 1,0 0,0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 120 0.12 490 112 0.0 2.2 1,0 0,0 ' 0.0 . 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 

• - •. • • - • 

: ii 2 0.0 2,1 1,0 , 0.0 0.0 

14^Dlchloroethene ^ 

7/18/2011 ISLDFSG380 

• •-- • .• - •.: 

112 0.0 1,8 1,0 0.0 : 0.0 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 180 0.18 : 710 112 0.0 

: •- . •. 

.1.0 

-• 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/4/2011 ISLDFSG368 150 0.15 600 112 0.0 .0.8 1,0 0.0 0.0 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/6/2011 iSI,DFSG369 140 0.14 570 112 0.0 2.0 1,0 0.0 0.0 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

: 7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 140 0.14 ; 560 . 112 0.0 2.1 1.0 0.0 - 0.0 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 170 0.17 ; 670 112 0.0 1.7 1,0 0.0 0.0 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 140 0.14 550 112 0.0 2.0 1,0 0.0 0.1 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 170 0.17 670 112 0.0 2.2 1,0 0,0 0.1 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 140 0.14 560 112 0.0 2.1 1.0 0,0 0.1 

>jtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene 

7/18/2011 :; ISLDFSG380 130 0.13 520 112 0.0 1.8 •. :1,0 . 0.0 0.1 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG357 67000 67 270000 112 2.7 1.0 

- •• . ••. -•.: 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/4/2011 ISLDFSG368 66000 66 260000 112 2.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 .2. 0 . . 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/6/2011 ISLDFSG369 68000 68 270000 112 2,7 2.0 1,0 .5. 3 7.3 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 70000 70 280000 112 2.8 2.1 1.0 6.0 13.4 . 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/10/20li ISLDFS6376 90000 90 360000 112 3.6 1.7 1,0 6.3 19.6 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 82000 82 330000 112 3.3 2.0 1,0 6.5 26.2 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 85000 85 340000 112 . 3.4 2,2 1,0 7.4 33.6 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 81000 81 320000 112 : 3.2 2,1 1,0 6.6 40.3 

01 

- !" C -

01 

1 JB 

< fl! J 

o , 

o 

£ > 

5 

rt 

:; ::;:'u; '.Ji; 

7/18/2011 iSLDFSG380 81000 81 320000 112 3.2 1.8 1.0 5.8 -: 46.0 .:. . 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 

• - • • 

112 0.0 1.0 

•- - • 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/4/2011 ISLDFSG368 110 0.11 580 .112 0:0 0,8 :.1.0 0.0 0.0 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/6/2011 ISLDFSG369 

- . 

112 0.0 2.0 , 1,0 0.0 0.0 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 120 0.12 630 112 0.0 2,1 1.0 0:0 0.0 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 : 150 0.15 840 112 0,0 1.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 140 0.14 790 112 : 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 140 . 0.14 . 750 112 0.0 2.2 1,0 • 0.0 0.1 : 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 140 0.14 790 112 0.0 2.1 •: 1,0 0.0 0.1 

- •,•...•,•.';•: fl«:.': v.-si • 

,•.:-:*..• C;':. "-;>:s 

•n.v:.-

• ;^^.;:JC.V 

.'. •^iS-';«)v 

• ;•-:-••.,•.> O;.' 

:.:-.j>::_o:^' i^ : 

£ 

?::::^Ki^;r:V.--;V; 

•\. •^:.:^' rti: • 

".,V-;:-.;.lH..:..;>.-

:..'v:'; -.rt ••• '.vv 7/18/2011 ISLDFSG380 130 0.13 720 112 0.0 1.8 1,0. 0.0 • 0.1 
Table 9 Continued 

Nuinber Total Mass 

Lab : : • U b -{i::iab-i • tbf days Uptime Removed Cuinulatiye 

Resultis Results Results Flow Pounds per (since last percentage during period Mass Removed 

Date Saiiiple lb: (ppbv) (ppmv) (pg/m-) (scfm) . .'•••'day;;': .sample) forperiod ; (pounds) : (pbuhds) 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 -

• -

0.0 

01 

•' -2 • 

7/4/2011 1SLDFSG368 - -

0.0 0,0 1,0 0.0 0.0 

•i^£':^:i 7/6/2011 1SLDFSG369 -

0.0 2,0 1,0 0,0 0.0 

.c 

•... :• U • V. 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 

• - • - • 

-

0.0 2.1 1.0 0,0 0,0 

• • .-.^v.'oj'-^- ^ :'.::•; - 7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 

• -

- -

0.0 1,7 1.0 0.0 0.0 

........ ^ 

:'.' :c •':•••.• 

7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 -

- • 

0,0 2,0 i.b 0,0 0.0 

•••:vO-

••y.a'..i. ; 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 - -

• -

0,0 2,2 1.0 0,0 0,0 

:•••:•• ::iO 

CJ :. :•:-

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 

- • 

0.0 2.1 1.0 0,0 0,0 

7/18/2011 ISLDFSG380 

•- •. - • 

0.0 1.8 1.0 0,0 0.0 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 5200 5,2 35000 112 0.4 

• .• - • 

1.0 

: •- - • 01 . 7/4/2011 ISLDFSG368 4100 4,1 28000 112 0,3 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.2 

01 7/6/2011 ISLDFSG369 3000 3 20000 112 0,2 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.6 

o 

7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 1800 1,8 12000 112 0,1 2.1 1.0 0.3 0,9 

o 7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 2300 2,3 . 16000 112 0,2 1,7 1,0 0.3 . 1.1 

.•••JC 7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 1800 1,8 12000' 112 0,1 2.0 1.0 0.2 1.4 

s -

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 1400 1,4 9500 112 0,1 2.2 1.0 0.2 1.6 

7/16/2011 ISLDFS6379 1400 1.4 9600 112 0.1 2.1 1.0 0.2 1,8 

7/18/2011 1SLDFSG380 130 0.13 9000 112 . 0,1 1,8 1.0 0.2 2,0 

7/3/2011 ISLDFSG367 120 0.12 390 112 0,0 1.0 r •• 

-

7/4/2011 ISLDFSG368 120 0.12 400 112 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.0 0,0 

7/5/2011 ISLDFSG369 140 0.14 440 112 0,0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0,0 

o> 7/8/2011 ISLDFSG373 160 0.16 530 112 0,0 2,1 1.0 0.0 0.0 

. c 7/10/2011 ISLDFSG376 240 0.24 780 112 0,0 1,7 1.0 0.0 0.0 

. flj . -

. C B 7/12/2011 ISLDFSG377 230 0.23 740 112 0,0 2,0 : 1.0 0.0 0.1 

7/14/2011 ISLDFSG378 240 0.24 760 112 0,0 2,2 1.0 0.0 0.1 

7/16/2011 ISLDFSG379 240 0,24 750 112 0.0 2,1 1.0 0.0 0.1 

7/18/2011 ISLDFSG380 250 0,25 800 112 0.0 1,8 1.0 0.0:: . 0.1 . 

Notes-. 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

Jig/m'- micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table 10 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Nurnber Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed Miass 

Results Results Results Flow pounds per (since last percentage durini period Removed 

Date Sarnple ID (ppbv) (ppmv) :(Hg/m') (scfm) •day: :;.;;: sample) i forperiod (pounds) (pounds) 

4/30/2011 ISLDFSG290 1206 1.2 6666 118 0.1 0.0 -

0.0 0.0 

Ul 

O 

OJ 

5/1/2011 ISLDFSG294 2900 2.9 16660 119 0.2 1.1 100% 0.2 ' 0.2 Ul 

O 

OJ 

5/3/2011 ISLDFSG295 4200 4.2 22666 125 0,3 1.8 100% 0.5 0.7 

c 

JJ! 

5/5/2011 ISLDFSG296 4000 4 22666 125 0,2 : 2.0 106% 0,5 1,1 

>• 

£ 

5/7/2011 ISLDFSG300 6500 6.5 35666 120 0.4 2.0 100% 0.7 1,9 

01 

o 5/9/2011 ISLDSG301 7500 7.5 , 46660 125 0.4 2.0 100% 0.9 2,8 

. o 5/11/2011 ISLDSG302 4700 4,7 25000 119 0.3 2.0 100% 0.5 3.3 

• o 5/13/2011 ISLDSG304 3000 3 16000 119 0.2 2.1 100% 0.4 3.7 

5/15/2011 ISLDSG305 6600 6,6 35000 119 0.4 2.1 100% 0,8 4,5 

4/30/2011 ISLDFSG290 

• •-

-

: -• 

118 0,0 0.0 

•- . 

0.0 OO 

0) 5/1/2011 ISLDFSG294 -

- •. 

- 119 0.0 1.1 106% 0.0 0 0 

0) 5/3/2011 ISLDFSG295 - .- 125 0.0 1.8 100% 0.0 0,0 

o 5/5/2011 ISLDFSG296 -

• -

- 125 6.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0,0 

5/7/2011 ISLDFSG366 17 0.017 69 120 0.0 2,0 ; 100% 0.0 ao 

••":' .--^v-vSii-

• 1 •J-^V-^^: U ^ -^v! •^::=:,< 5/9/2011 ISLDSG361 25 0,025 98 125 0,0 2.0 106% 0.0 0,0 

••;i!::^&^5^'^::;;V: 

'•'::K:/:rt;.-:c5s:i 5/11/2011 ISLDSG362 18 0,018 73 119 0,0 2,0 166% ao 0,0 

5/13/2011 ISLDSG364 -

. - .• 

119 0,0 ,2.1 166% 0.0 0,0 

:i-.-r^0i^A:-'::i->4^ 5/15/2011 ISLDSG365 32 0.032 130 119 : 0,0 2.1 166% 0.6 0,0 

4/30/2011 ISLDFSG290 1100 1.1 4400 118 0.0 0.0 -

0.0 oo 

C 

o 

5/1/2011 iSLDFSG294 2700 2.7 11000 119 6.1 1.1 166%. a i a i 

X 

. ';: OJ • 

5/3/2011 ISLDFSG295 3800 3.8 15000 125 6,2 1.8 100% 0 3 0,4 

g 5/5/2011 ISLDFSG296 4200 4.2 16000 125 6,2 2.0 100% .0.4 0.8 

' Z ' 5/7/2011 ISLDFSG300 6600 6.6 26000 120 6.3 2,0 100% 0.6 1.4 

9 5/9/2011 ISLDSG301 7700 7.7 31000 125 ; 6.3 2.0 100% 0,7 2,1 

.-rt * 5/11/2011 ISLDSG302 : 4700 4,7 18000 119 6.2 2.0 106% 0.4 • 2,5 

5/13/2011 ISLDSG304 3300 3.3 13000 119 6.1 2.1 106% 0.3 2,7 

5/15/2011 ISLDSG305 6906 6.9 27000 119 0.3 2.1 106% 0.6 : 3,3 

4/30/2011 ISLDFSG290 - . - . . 

- • 

118 0.0 0.0 

• .-

0.0 OO 

5/1/2011 ISLDFSG294 16 0.016/ 90 119 0,0 1.1 166% 0.0 0,0 

.c < 5/3/2011 ISLDFSG295 23 0.023 120 125 0.0 1,8 100% ao 0,0 

-OJ 

o 5/5/2011 ISLDFSG296 24 0.024 130 125 0.0 2.0 106% 0-0 . 0.0 

' 0 

JZ 5/7/2011 ISLDFSG300 37 0,037 200 120 0,0 2.0 106% 0.0 0.0 

' .s 5/9/2011 ISLDSG301 46 0.046 250 125 0.0 2,0 100% 0.0 : 0.0 

.r t 5/11/2011 ISLDSG302 36 0.036 180 119 0,0 2,0 100% 0.0 OO 

rt 5/13/2011 ISLDSG304 23 0,023 120 119 0.0 2.1 166% 0,0 0.0 

5/15/2011 ISLDSG305 51 0,051 280 119 0.0 2.1 166% ao ao 

4/30/2011 ISLDFSG290 - - 140 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 

' 01 

. c 

5/1/2011 ISLDFSG294 39 0,039 260 120 0,0 1.1 100% 0.0 0,0 

01 

>•' 

5/3/2011 ISLDFSG295 75 0.075 510 119 0.0 1.8 ' 100% 0.0 0,0 

** 

0> 

5/5/2011 ISLDFSG296 67 0.067 450 119 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0,0 

& 

Q 

5/7/2011 ISLDFSG300 126 0.12- 810 117 0.0 2.0 100% 0,0 oo 

JE 5/9/2011 ISLDSG301 140 0,14 960 115 0.0 2.0 100% ao 0 1 

5/11/2011 ISLDSG302 110 0.11 720 115 0,0 2,0 100% 0,0 0,1 'tt 

H 5/13/2011 ISLDSG304 60 0.06 410 115 0.0 2,1 100% 0.0 0,1 

5/15/2011 ISLDSG305 160 0,15 1100 115 0.0 2.1 106% 0.0 a i : 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute -
Table 11 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime Removed - Mass 

Results Results Results Flow Pounds per (since last percentage during period Removed 

Date Sample ID : (ppbv) (ppmv) (Hg/m') (scfm) day sample) forperiod (pounds) (pounds) 

6/1/2011 ISLDFSG342 3600 3.5 19000 112 0.2 0.0 -, 0.0 a6 

IJ ••..: 

t. 

6/2/2011 ISLDFSG343 4700 4.7 25000 112 0.3 1.0 100% 6.3 6.3 

OJ 6/4/2011 ISLDFSG344 4800 4.8 26000 112 0 3 1.7 100% a4 0 7 ithyler 

6/6/2011 ISLDFSG346 5300 5.3 28000 112 0.3 2.0 100% a5 1.3 

ithyler 

6/8/2011 ISLDFSG349 3600 3.5 26666 112 a2 2.0 100% 6.4 1.7 

g 6/10/2011 ISLDFSG350 5600 5.5 36666 112 0.3 2.0 100% 0.6 2.3 

• • • 

5/12/2011 ISLDFSG352 5800 5.8 31666 112 0.3 2.3 106% 0.7 3.0 

I— 6/14/2011 ISLDFSG353 5700 5.7 36000 112 0.3 1.7 166% 6.5 3.5 

6/16/2011 ISLDFSG354 6400 6.4 34000 112 0.3 1.9 166% 6.7 4.2 

6/1/2011 ISLDFSG342 58 0.058 230 112 0.0 0.0 

•-

•6.6 OO 

OJ 

c 

6/2/2011 1SLDFSG343 55 0,065 260 112 0.0 1.0 106% 6.6 0.0 

OJ ' 6/4/2011 ISLDFSG344 : 68 • 0,068 270 112 0.0 1.7 .166% 0.0 0.0 

OJ 

g ' 

6/5/2011 ISLDFSG346 78 0.078 310 112 0,0 , 2,0 106% 0.0 0.0 

o 5/8/2011 ISLbFSG349 56 0,056 220 112 0,0 2.0 100%, 0,0 0.0 

6/10/2011 ISLOFSG350 70 0.67 280 112 0.0 .2,0 100% ao 0.0 

6/12/2011 ISLbFSG352 80 6.68 320 112 0.0 2.3 100% ao 0.0 

rt 6/14/2011 ISLDFSG353 71 0.071 280 112 0.0 1.7 100% ao 0.0 

.'Ss;te:--My;:: 6/16/2011 ISLDFSG354 94 0.094 370 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 OO 

6/1/2011 ISLDFSG342 21 0.021 85 112 0.0 6.6 - O.O OO 

OJ 

c 

5/2/2011 1SLDFSG343 22 0.022 91 112 0.0 1.6 100% ao 6.6 

re 

•.?>-•••!• ;.:-£: ••":•'•.:••' 

5/4/2011 ISLbFSG344 20 0.02 82 : 112 0.0 1.7 100% ao ao 

01 

' ' O . 

6/6/2611 ISLbFSG346 22 0.022 90 112 0.0 2.6 100% 0.0 0.0 

o 6/8/2011 ISLDFSG349 58 0.058 240 112 0.0 2.0 100% ao 0.0 

u 6/10/2011 ISLbFSG350 21 ao2i 87 112 0,0 2.0 100% 6.6 0.0 

rt 6/12/2011 ISLDFSG352 23 0,023 93 : 112 0,0 2.3 100% 6.6 0.0 

rt 6/14/2011 ISLbFSG353 22 0,022 90 112 0.0 1.7 100% a6 0.0 

6/16/2011 :ISLDFSG354 22 0,022 91 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.6 0.0 -v: 

- 01 

5/1/2011 ISLDFSG342 430 0,43 1700 112 0.0 0.0 

.-• 

6.6 0.0 

C 

. OJ 6/2/2011 ISL0FSG343 710 071 2800 112 0.0 1,0 106% 6.6 0.0 

tt 5/4/2011 ISLDFSG344 850 085 : 3400 112 0.0 1,7 106% a i a i 

o 6/6/2011 ISLbFSG345 950 a95 3860 112 0,0 2.0 166% 0.1 0 2 

::.-: .:u 6/8/2011 ISL0FSG349 110 0,11 450 112 0,0 2.0 166% ao 0.2 -1,2-Di 

6/10/2011 ISLDFSG350 1300 1,3 5366 112 a i 2.0 160% a i 0 3 -

-1,2-Di 

6/12/2011 1SLPFSG352 1600 1.6 6300 112 a i 2,3 106% 0.1 6.4 

tn V 

U 6/14/2011 ISL0FSG353 1700 1.7 6900 112 a i 1,7 100% a i 6.5 

6/16/2011 ISL0FSG354 2000 2 7700 112 0,1 1,9 100% 6.1 . 0 7 • 
Table 11 Continued 

Number Total Mass Cumulative : 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime, Removed IViass • 

Results Results Results Flow Poundsper (since last percentage during period Reitioved ; 

••• bate ...... Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (|ig/m') (scfm) day isamplej forperiod (pounds) (pciiunds) 

' OJ . 

c 

ffl 

6/1/2611 ISL0FSG342 35 ao35 190 112 0.0 ao - ... . o:o 0.0 

' OJ . 

c 

ffl 6/2/2011 ISLbFSG343 40 0.04 220 112 0.0 1.0 100% 0.0 0.0 ;hlor9ethi 

5/4/2011 ISLbFSG344 42 0.042 • 230 112 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

;hlor9ethi 

6/6/2011 ISLDFSG346 45 0.045 240 112 oo 2.0 100% 0.0. 0.0 

;hlor9ethi 

6/8/2011 ISLDFSG349 25 0.025 140 112 0.0 2,0 100% 0.0 0.0 

5/10/2011 ISLDFSG350 47 0.047 260 112 ao 2.0 ioo% 0.0 0.0 

••.•::•.:.• •rt.::^ • ' 6/12/2011 ISLbFSG352 49 0.049 270 112 0.0 2.3 100% 0.0 . 0.0 

6/14/2011 ISLDFSG353 48 0.048 260 112 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 00 

6/16/2011 ISL0FS6354 52 a052 296 112 0.0 1.9 100% ao 0.0 

6/1/2011 ISLDFSG342 110 0.11 760 140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

. OJ,'^ 6/2/2011 ISLDFSG343 200 0.2 1300 120 oo 1.0 100% 0.0 ao 

ot ">• 6/4/2011 ISLDFSG344 220 a22 1500 119 oo 1.7 100% 0.0 0.0 

-' ' OJ' 5/6/2011 ISLDFSG346 250 a25 1700 119 0.0 2.0 100% 0.0 ai chloro 

6/8/2011 ISLbFSG349 130 0.13 880 117 0.0 2,0 100% ao ai • 

chloro 

6/10/2011 ISLDFSG350 280 0.28 1900 115 oo 2.0 : 100% 0.0 ai 

.,.K;;;.',;2-:&j--- • 

. :• .i-.-: 4J -.•••• 6/12/2011 ISLDFSG352 290 a 29 2066 115 oo 2.3 100% . 0.0 0 2 

- 1- ^' 6/14/2011 ISLDFSG353 290 a29 2660 115 0.0 1.7 100% 0.0 0.2 

5/16/2011 ISLDFSG354 280 0.28 1906 115 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 0.3 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

Hg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Table 12 

Laboratory Results and Mass Removal Calculations 

Former Sanitary Landfill 

Tooele, Army Depot; Tooele, Utah 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab -'• Lab of days Uptinie Rismoved ••.;•. Mass 

Results:: Results Results Flow Pounds per (siiice last percentage during perictd v Remov^cl 

bate Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (tig/m^) (scfm) day sample) forperiod ; (pounds) (pounds) 

8/4/2011 ISLDFSG385 2300 2.3 13000 112 0 1 0.0 

• •-

0.0 0 0 

uT -

u 

8/5/2011 ISLDFSG393 1900 1.9 10000 112 O l 0.7 100% 0 1 0.1 

£. • 8/7/2011 System Off for Repairs -

- • 

2.2 - . . 0 1 

hylene 

8/9/2011 ISLDFSG394 1800 1.8 9700 112 0 1 2.0 100% 6.2 0 3 

hylene 

8/11/2011 1SLDFSG395 1700 1.7 9200 112 0 1 1.9 106% 0 2 0.4 

OJ 

- o ^ 

8/13/2011 ISLDFSG396 1600 1.6 8700 112 O l 2.1 166% 0 2 0.6 

c 

o . 

8/15/2011 ISLDFSG401 1300 1.3 7000 112 0 1 1.9 160% a i 0.8 

£ * 8/17/2011 ISLDFSG402 1500 1.6 8600 112 0 1 1.9 . 100% 02 0 9 

8/19/2011 ISLDFSG404 1700 1,7 9300 112 a i 2,0 100% 0 2 1.1 

8/21/2011 ISLDFSG405 1300 1.3 7100 112 0 1 1,9 : 100% 0.1 1.2 

8/4/2011 ISLDFSG385 

•-• • - . : - .• • 

112 oo 0.0 0.0 OO 

8/5/2011 ISLDFSG393 

. . . -

• -

112 oo 0 7 100% 6.6 0.0 

c 

.OJ 

8/7/2011 System Off for Repairs - : 

.•. -

2.2 -

-• 

0.0 

J: . 

OJ 

8/9/2011 ISLDFSG394 - -;. - 112 0.0 2.0 100% 0 6 0.0 

' s ? 

o [ 

8/11/2011 ISLDFSG395 15 0.015 58 112 0.0 1.9 166% 6,6 OO 

8/13/2011 ISLDFSG396 16 0.016 65 112 0,0 2.1 166% 6.6 0.0 • 

9 8/15/2011 ISLDFSG401 - . - 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.6 0.0 

. ^r t ' 

rt 

8/17/2011 ISLDFSG402 18 0.018 71 112 0.0 1.9 106% 6.6 0.0 

©-^tS- iil;'vS: 8/19/2011 ISLDFSG404 18 0.018 71 i l 2 0.0 2.0 100% OO 0 0 

8/21/2011 ISLDFSG405 15 0.015 60 112 6.6 1.9 100% 6.0 OO 

:; - " ' 

8/4/2011 ISLDFSG385 830 : 0.83 3306 112 6.6 6.0 : 

. • .• 

OO 0.0 

OJ :• 8/5/2011 ISLDFSG393 700 0 7 2866 112 0 6 6.7 100% 0.0 OO 

OJ 8/7/2011 System Off for Repairs 

-• 

. 2.2 . 0,0 

01 

O ' 8/9/2011 ISLDFSG394 590 0.69 2700 112 6.6 2.6 166% 6.1 0 1 

. _o . 8/11/2011 ISLDFSG395 730 a 73 2900 112 6.6 1.9 100% O l 0 1 

8/13/2011 ISLDFSG396 700 0 7 2800 112 OO 2.1 100% 0 1 0 2 

IS 8/15/2011 ISLDFSG401 690 0.69 2700 112 OO 1.9 100% a i • 0 2 

rt ^ 8/17/2011 ISLDFSG402 800 0 8 3200 112 .0.0 1.9 166% 6,1 0 3 

C J 8/19/2011 ISLDFSG404 1000 1 4000 112 0.0 2.0 160% 0.1 0,4 

8/21/2011 ISLDFSG405 760 a 76 3000 • 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.1 0,4 

••'•'•'•:•':••• -r:':.' 
Table 12 Continued 

Number Total Mass Cumulative 

Lab Lab Lab of days Uptime ; Renioved MasS; 

Results Results Results Flow Pounds per (since last percentage during period Renioved 

Date Sample ID (ppbv) (ppmv) (Hg/m') (scfm) day siample) for period (pounds) (pounds) 

8/4/2011 ISL0FSG385 34 0.034 180 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 

OJ 8/5/2011 ISLDFSG393 37 0.037 200 112 0.0 a7 ' 100% 6.6 0.0 

c 

re 8/7/2611 System Off for Repairs 

- • • - • • 

2.2 

- •. 

. - 0.0 

OJ 8/9/2611 ISLDFSG394 39 0.039 210 112 0.0 2.0 100% 6.6 ao 

::?^i^:T<0';^-''K, 8/11/2611 ISLDFSG395 42 0.042 180 112 0.0 1.9 100% 6.6 0.0 

8/13/2011 ISLDFS6395 37 0.037 200 112 0.0 2.1 100% 6.6 o.or 

yyp^f-i-y 8/15/2011 ISLDFSG401 • 29 0.029 160 112 6.6 1.9 100% OO 0.0 

:;:::^\-;'::rt; • .'..^v;. 

rt 8/17/2611 ISLDFSG402 36 0.035 200 112 6.6 1.9 100% 0.6 0.0 

v;:V.::'.";;r^;:.'.;hi-, 8/19/2011 ISLDFSG404 39 0.039 210 112 6.0 2.0 100% 0.0 0.0 

8/21/2011 ISLDFSG405 34 0.034 190 112 0.0 1.9 100% OO 0.0 

8/4/2011 ISLDFSG385 300 0 3 2000 112 0.0 0.0 0% OO 0.0 

ene-' 

8/5/2011 ISLDFSG393 420 0.42 2900 112 0.0 0.7 0% o:o oo 

ene-' 

8/7/2011 System Off for Repairs - -

2.2 0% -

0.0 

>- 8/9/2611 ISLDFSG394 170 0.17 1200 112 0.0 2.0 0% OO oo 

QJ g 8/11/2611 ISLDFSG395 92 0.092 620 112 0.0 1.9 0% 0.0 a i 

8/13/2611 ISLDFSG396 89 0.089 600 112 0.0 2.1 0% 0.0 0.1 

re : 8/15/2611 ISLDFSG401 52 0.052 350 112 ao 1.9 0% , 0.0 01 

8/17/2011 ISLDFSG402 46 0.046 310 112 0.0 1.9 0% 0.0 0.1 

8/19/2611 ISLDFSG404 48 6.648 330 112 0.0 2.0 0% 0,0 0.1 

8/21/2011 ISLDFSG405 30 6.63 210 112 0.0 1.9 100% 0.0 a i 

\:;.-";;S.'^:*:K::.;:';^ ^ ; 

Notes: 

Only analytes detected at least once are displayed 

"-" = analyte not detected above laboratory reporting limit for that specific date 

ppbv - part per billion by volume 

ppmv - part per million by volume 

pg/m^ - micrograms per cubic meter 

scfm - standard cubic feet per minute 
Oi 

cc 

B 

— Q. — E \ ra ' in A. 

J 

CO - Q 

c o >. E — cu 

c O 10 

'Ui c 

c/> O £ ^ OJ 

y 

^ 0 

c 

v-r. .) 

:'ij^-' 

OS 

Y 1 .v.-
•> o 

.E O x : 

S c 2 

OJ TO 3 

.E E ^ 

a) ^•:r. Ul 

.2 o 

in c 

•- .2 

m 2 

? E 

1 I 

X OJ o 

D. = O 

UJ z o: 

OJ J5 

o o n 05, o o 

o-*r-~ooiDi^^ o 

o t-- in o o 

JD CO 

c 

0) 

E 

O CD 

OJ OJ CO OJ Li . 

£a)cBa3n!o>. o 

UJX_lSZHXI -

J 3 3 OJ 

5 P 

E E 

^ •; ^ 

03 0) W y , 

y TO D) CD 

-Q O O g . OJ ^ 

" ^ ^ <" £ g 

CD CO o o 

CD CO r-- CD P 

ocoTj-ooinmin o 

OOOCSJOOCNICOt^ O 

cDo6T-oocot~-.^odLr ) 

a)£(D(i)a)n!o>. o 

cauJi_iS2i-Xl -

CO -S ^ 

O O OD o -<io i n o ^ CM 

a . | ^ S E E 

O ^ S m CD to 

.» 2 Q S ^ ^ 

n c — c CZ 

o cn cr> o ^ 

O Z o o o ro in 

d C3 O C3 

CO 00 

00 in 

CNJ o o o So K 

m o o CD o 

O O CJ) CM 

a)£a>a)3;cDo>- o 

CQUJI_l2ZHXt -

U) UJ 
Table 1 

Analytical Results for Soil Samples 

Direct Push and igroundwater Monitoring Well Investigation 

Teddy Bear Truck Stop 

October-November, 1999 ^ 

Sample 

ID 

Lab ID Date Depth TPH MTBE Benzene j Toluene 

Ethylben 

ene 

^ Xylenes 

Napthale 

ne 

Sampled i Analyzed (ft) (mq/m) . . • . : -

_ . Soil Samples from Site lnvestiqat[on f9/28 to 9/30/99) 

GP-1 •199909152 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 8 <10 <0.05 <0.025 <0.025 *;0.025 :<0.075 <0.05 

199909154 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 :• 8 <10 ;• :<0.05 <0.025 <0.025 . <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-3 19.9909156 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 9 <10 <0.05 1 <0.D25 :<0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-4 199909157 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 6 <io: <0.05 :<0.025 <0.025 sO.025 <0.075 <0.05 

•""GP- S 199909159 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 5.5 <io: ;<0.05 0.2 <0.025 <0.G25 0.05 0.07 

GP-5 199909159 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 10 <10 <0.05 <0.025 :-<0.025 ;<0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

-««ep-5 199909159 9/28/1999 10/1/1999 ; 15 <io: 

GP-6 199909165 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 4 .:.. 14.0 <0.05: 0.08; 0-1 0.1 0.6 .<0.05 

GP-6 199909165 9/28/1999 10/4/1999 6 279 <2.5 3.5 15: 5.5 28 2.5 

«»«ep-6 199909165. .9/28/1999 10/4/1999 13 : <io:; <0.G5: :<0.025 <0.025 <0.a25 <0.075 ; <0.05 

GP-7 199909168 .9/28/1999: 10/4/1999 7 <10 <0,05 <0.025- :^0.025 ( <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

• GP-8 199909222 •9/29/1999; 10/4/1999 :-'6V-... <10 -;O,05 ; <0.025 :<0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

SP' 9 : 199909228 .9/29/1999 10/4/1999 6 .• j <10 <0.05 ' iO.025: <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 ' ~^0.0 5 

GP-10 199909230 .•-9/29/1999 10/4/1999 : 6 . 528 ' <2.5 5.0 , 30 10 r 45 4 

GP-11 199909232 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 6 V . 183.0 <0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 5.1 0.9 

GP-t2 199909224 :9/29/t999 10/4/1999 6 102.0 ^0.05 . <0.G25 . •.<0.025 1 <0.025 <0.075 0.07 

. GP-13 . 199909226 9/29/1999 10/4/1.999 .: 4 <10: <0.05: :<0.025 : <0.025 i : <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-14 199909234 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 ." 4- ; ' 162.0 --.<0vQ5:" —<ao25- --^:0.025 0.05. 0.16 -0.5 

• -GP-15 - 199909236 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 ...... 4 44.0 --<0;05^ ^0=025 -^0.0 3 <0.025 - 0.3 0.2 

GP-16 199909238 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 <10 <0.05 -<0.025 <Q.025 .<0.025 0.07 0.09 

GP"17 199909240 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 .. -4 <io: :<0.05 0.05 <:0.025 1 ;<0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

- GP-48 199909242 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 :. 4 . ::<io; <0.05 - icO.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

.GP-19 199909244 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 4 70.0 . • <0.05 : '^<0.025 :.; 0.6 3.6 ---2:4 . 

. GP-20 199909246 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 • -4 •. <10: <0.05 0.2 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-21 199909248 9/29/1999 10/4/1999 7 4. : <10 <0.05---'- -<0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.02 0.2 

GP-22 199909S85'-; 9/30/1999 10/4/1-999 : •.••4.;.;. <10 :<0.05 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-23 199909287 9/30/1999. 10/4/1999 .' 4 • <10 •.•::.<o.o5 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP~24 199909289 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 t 5 •• : <10 <0.05 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

QP-25 199909292 9/3.0/1999 10/4/1999 . .4 : <10 <0.05 0.06 <0.025 :<0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-26 199909295 9/30/1999 • 10/4/1999 .4 424.0 <0.05 <0.025 <:0.025 ;<0.025 <0.076 0.9 

GP-27 199909297 ,9/30/1999 1G/4/1999 ^6 • 1,068 :<0.05 <0.025 <0.025 0.5 /• 1.6 -3. 3 

GP-28 199909299 ; 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 V 4 : : <10 .<0.05 <0.025 <0.025 0.06 0.35 0.4 

GP-29 199909301 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 \ 6 <10 <0.05 <0.025 0.07 0.2 0.35 0.1 

GP-30 199909303 9/30/1999; • 10/4/1999 ,:?>6 - :.. <i.o:: <0.05 <0.025 <0,025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-30 199909305; 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 10:: <10 <0.05 <0.025 ;<0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-31 199909306- 9/30/1999' 10/4/1999 .- 6-.V' : <io • <0.05 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 : <0.075 : <0.05 

GP-31 199909307 9/30/1999 10/4/1999. 8 : <io ;<0.05 <0.025 <0.02S <0.025 <0.075 0.6 

GP-32 .199909309 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 :?:- 6;;.;; : <10; ^<0.05 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.075 <0.05 

GP-33 199909311 ; 9/30/1999 iO/4/1999 :•: .:6. :. .<ia: <0.05 ;<0.025 <0,025 <0.025 <0.075 - <0.05 

'/ •,,. 

GP-34 9911226-06 11/15/1999 11/30/1999 3-4 <3 <0.0035 <0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

GP-35 9911226-05 11/1.5/1999 11/30/1999 . 3-4. <3::- :• <0.0035 ;<0.001.5 <0.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

MW-8 9911226-01 11/15/1999 11/30/1999 . 4-6 <3 <0.0035 <0.0015 .<0.0035, <0.0025 <0.0065 :<o.ooi5 

. MW-9 9911226-02 11/15/1999 11/30/1999 ^•::..'4-6:. <3 <0.0035 :*:0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

MW-10 9911226-03 •11/15/1999 11/30/1999 3-5 • <3: .<0.0Q36 <0.0015 <d.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

MW-H 9911226-04 11715/1999 11/30/1999 : . 5-7:" <3- .<0.0d35 <0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

MW-12 9911226-07 11/16/1999 11/30/1999 6-8 <3 <0.0035 <0.0015 :<0.0035 <0.0025 <0.0065 <:0.0015 

MW-13 9911226-08 11/1:6/1999 11/30/1999 6-8 <3 :<0.0035 <0.0015 <0.0d35 <0.0025 <0.0065 <0.0015 

MW-14 9911226-09 11/16/1999 11/30/1999 6-8 <3 <0.0035 0.0395 <0.0035 0.0355 0.142 0.0076 

MW-15 9911226-10 11/16/1999 11/30/1999 6-8 •. <3-.'..' <0.0035 0.3S9 0.015 0.361 0.565 0.0298 

, RCL i 30 0.2 - . 100 ; -• 70 1,000 2.0 

Tierl 1 1,500 0.3 : 0.9 61; 23 235 10 
i f 

2 S 

CD 

3 ^ 

£ >, OJ J2 

M l "O 

_ - D 

o o o ^ 

CDCDOtncOOCMtl -

in^oincnincDcs i 

CO o o m ^ 

cn Ol cn CO CO 

O O CM 00 

o cn CM in CD CO 

o in cn in 

cninoLOt^inin' * 

- • CM O O CM Tt To in Tt • in CD o 

o m m in in o 

o O CM 1^ Tcn o Ln in m in 

CM CM o o CM 

o o .-,^0 0 

t i l 

=3 O B o 

i E E 

cn CO 

E 

cu CO 

a> CT) 2 .2 

'iZ '.5 tn E 

OOOOO^CMCMfOO O 

Lnoococj>i~^o-! -

<3'<-OC3C3CMLric O 

CD 

^ c- CIf,-Iil O "s; ^ — ^ l 

CDUJ_l2Zl-X H 

- a vi; 

o a cn . t 

O O 00 O CO 

TM CP -

TO c5 

Q C tn 

n ^y E E 

.« S Q S ^5 ^ 

O R = T_ C C 

i - O O (t; CO 

D L O CO < _] _ l 

OOO O 

OOO O 

OOO O 

L ; O O 00 05 oo 

00 o 00 CO q 

• CM CD O CM r--^ 

CD o r^ 

a)£S.2iSo>. o cQm_i5ZHXi -
Utah Oi>A^?!eleW section 

NeM* source Rev 

- TpH-^gtoV y^ ^ 

°°°° ^ — '''rir''ontoca*° " 

-—electri c . Q otlne^-

— 
Soil/groundwater Hydrocarbon Remediation 

Form 16 (Continued) 

18. Attach discharge monitoring plan (quarterly to semi-annual sampling) 

Biodegradation 

19. Kind of nutrients added to soil: (Nitrates to diesel 

contaminant land farm cell; imported moisture as 

needed) 

20. Water flow rate: acfm 

21. Pump requirements: hp ftAmin 22. Number of wells: ^Recovery Injection 

In-situ Leaching 

23. Surfactarit used: 24. Pump requirements: hp ft Am in 

25: Leachate flow rate: 

Design maximum: _ 

Average expected: 

_acfm 

acfm 

26. Number of monitoring wells 

27. Describe treatment of leachate: 

Thermal Treatment 

28. lype of equipment:^ Rotary kilna Rotary drier • Fluidizedbed 

• Low-temperature thermal stripper • Other. 

29. Company performing the incineration: 

Approval Order # 

30. Incineration capacity (tons/hr, etc.): 

Soil Aeration 

31. Site of Aeration: Bowler Land, Veyo, Utah 

Note: 2 Qejls -1 diesel cell; 1 gasoline cell (see#32) 

32. Dinlensions of aerated layer: 50 ft_ length 

_3bft^ width _p.5f L depth 

33. Type of soil: lean clay to clayey sand 34. Method to be used to turn the soil and frequency of 

turning the soil: back hoe; monthly to quarterly 

Asphalt Incorporation 

35. Company using soil ih asphalt: 36. Approval Order # 

Groundwater Stripping 

37. Groundwater flow rate: 

_gals/min 

38. Type of treatment: • Packet tower 

• Oil/water separator • Carbon adsorption 

• Other 

39. Exhaust flow rate: 40. Stack height: 

41. Stack diameter: 42. Expected concentration flow rate (grams/sec): 

43. Stack gas exit temperature: 44. Attach discharge monitoring plan 

Page 2 of 3 
o i : 

<n % 2 

= * =3 

o <s o 

a s u. 

3 ^ 

.9 o 

? E 

1 I 

CO O CD 

O O O •<-

cncDoooytf-cjjc o 

" • " " CD " r: 

r< 1-

Tt (N 

cncMOLOCMinin o 

•<--<-Oi-C35COCD- ^ 

°0 CO <P 05 2 S 

i n CM 1- ^ h~ 

•*cDoincDooinc o 

-*=cu.2coo>. o 

CD m _ i S z I- X H 

cn .Q 13 0) 

QJ I ^ E 

^ CO CD 

. y - O) O) CO OJ 

.Q O O g . (U 

o ^ cn E 

cn CO o 03 CD 

Tt CO Tt 

CO cji d 

00OOT-CM00Tt'< t COCNOin^-CMi-- * 

o o •'I- r-~ 

X3 O 

^ „ -2 1 cu 

0) CD >- ^ S 

'=.cra ^ Q.DaJi 5 

m III , - S 2J-_XJ -

Q. 

03 1 -

(j; CO 

>. O 

s -y ^ . 

CJ C m Cl) 

D g o cr y 

o O 00 O CO 

•ct in o o -rro S . . £5 ) 

TO 15 -S- >, < Q 

Q c to .-iJ - -

o E cu 

S CD Q 

E E 

Q -O -O 

£ O O CD CD 

D L O CA) < _ l _ i 

° CO CO CO 

c- CO CO CO ' 

S •r^ C3 CO 

o o Z o o o 

OOO O 

^ „ 00 o oo 

5>|?S Tt O O 1^ CM 

CM d d CD r-^ 

O 00 o Tt o •<-

o - ^ Jo 2 

.2 lo (u Q: 

^ £ c 0) I— 

x : cu c ^ 

Q. D ^ eg 

^u*-CD.S^CDO>^ 0 

CQLU-lSZHX K 
ENVIROPRO LABORATORIES 

• • • Environmental Analysis 

2712 South 3600 West; Suite E 

West Valley City, UT 84119 

Phone: (801) 964-2511 • Fax: (801) 964-2721" 

Analytical Test Results 

Underwood Environmental 

Earl Underwood 

9475 North Silver Creek Road 

Park City, UT 84098 

Date Reported: 5/27/2010 

Work Order #: 3335 

P0#/ Project Name: K&B Service LQD-07 

Date / Time Received: 5/14/2010 17:30 

Sample Name: Bio Cell AB C 

Collected: 5/14/2010 13:40 Matrix: Soil 

LablD#: 134016 

Parameter Method Analvsis Date MRL Units Results Flaas 

TPH PRO Prep 3550A 5/18/2010 X 

TPH- Diesel Range 8015B 5/27/2010 10 mg/kg :-258^^ R 

Parameter Method Analysis Date MRL Units Results Flags 

TPH GRO Prep 

. 5030A 5/25/2010 

TPH- Gasoline Range 8015B 5/25/2010 1 mg/kg 19:2; . . F . 

TVarameter 

- V • • • • 

Method Analvsis Date MRL Units Results Flags 

MBTEXN PREP 5030A 5/25/2010 

Benzene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg <, 0.002 

Ethylbenzene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 

MTBE ^ 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 

Naphthalene :* 8260B 5/25/2010 0.004 mg/kg 0.143-: 

Toluene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 U J 

Xylenes Total 8260B 5/25/2010 0.006 mg/kg < 0:006 

•A 

• :} 

Analyses presented in this report were performed in accordance with the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program jnelapl 

Order 3335 Page 1 of 2 
Sample Name: Bio Cell 123 

=^ollected: 5/14/2010 14:45 Matrix: Soil 

LablD#: 134017 

• • 

Parameter 

Method Analvsis Date MRL Units Results Flags 

TPH DRO Prep 3550A 5/18/2010 X 

TPH- Diesel Range 8015B 5/27/2010 10 mg/kg 367 F 

Parameter Method Analvsis Date MRL Units Results Flags 

TPH GRO Prep 5030A 5/20/2010 

TPH- Gasoline Range 8015B 5/20/2010 0.5 mg/kg 12.5 

Parameter Method Analvsis Date MRL Units Results Flags 

MBTEXN PREP 5030A 5/25/2010 

Benzene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 

Ethylbenzene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 

MTBE 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 

Naphthalene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.004 mg/kg 0.008 

Toluene 8260B 5/25/2010 0.002 mg/kg < 0.002 UJ 

Xylenes Total 8260B 5/25/2010 0.006 mg/kg <0.006 

Reviewed by: 

Comments: 

Signature 

J 

Roy Breslawski, Laboratory Manager 

^j^jj/lag Legend 

P- Sample not properly preserved (preservative added upon receipt) C- Sample not submitted In pro per container type H- Sample hold time exceeded Jhi- Estimated Value. Result may be biased high. Spil<e br 

Surrogate recovery above QC limits. Jlo- Estimated Value. Result may be biased low. Spike or Sun-ogate recovery below QC limits. UJ- Analyte not detected. Spilte or surrogate recovery below limits. Jcal- Estimated 

value. Result outside linear calibration range of instrument. F- No dual column confirmation. X- Hexane used for extractions. M- Micro-extraction used for TPH diesel range organics. 

Analyses presented in this report were performed in accordancewith the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (Debpj 

Order 3335 Page 2 of 2 
Wdtion Project 

B Service 

IDtt 0100181, Release Site ELQD 

TABLE 1 

HYDROCARBON MASS CALCULATIONS - BIOCELL 

K&B SERVICE : 

4 North Main Streetj Lewiston, UT -

Facility ID OIOOISL, Release Site ELQD 

Sample Nutnber 

Date 

Collected 

• ;*Analvte Concentrations in.Soil (mg/kg) : .--. . . -\ ' ': • 

Sample Nutnber 

Date 

Collected MTBli Benzene Tolucne v "Etiiylbenzene Total Xylenes Naphthalene' : TPH-G TPH-D 

Composite Samples Collected, from Soil Stocipiles. c . . . ^ ' \ ' . , ' . ' - •: •• 

Biocell ABC - " 05/14/10 <0;002 '\ <0.002 . <0,002 " <0.002 <:0.006 - 0.143 19.2 258 

Biocell 123 . 05/14/10 :• <0.002 . '<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ' <:0.006 0.008 "12.5 : 367 

Assumption / Calculations: 

ASSUME Biocell = 698 CY 

SOIL DENSriY 1H LB / CF {1.5 TON/CY) 

De Minimis Levels: 

INDIVIDUAL HAPs LIMIT IS 500 LB/YEAR 

TOTAL HAPs LIMIT IS 2000 LB/ YEAR 

TOTAL EMISSIONS (VOC,TPH) 5 TONS / YEAR 

Biocell HC Mass: 

698 CY * 1.5 TON/CY = 1047 TONS 

0.143 MG/KG / 1,000,000 = 0.000000143 TONS/TON 

0.000000143 TONS/TON » 1047 TONS = 0.0001497TONS NAPHTHALENE 

0.0001497 TONS NAPHTHALENE * 2000 LB = 0.299 LB NAPHTHALENE 

698 CY * . 1.5 TON/CY = 1047 TONS 

367 MG/KG /1,000,000 = 0.000367 TONS/TON 

0.000367 TONS/TON * 1047 TONS = 0.3842 TPH-DRO 

0.3842 TONS TPH-DRO * 2000 LB = 768.5 LB TPH-DRO 

• High Ave Tons Pounds 

Contaminant , Cone. Tons/Ton Contaminant Containinant 

MTBE : 0 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Benzene 0 :: 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 

Toluene > .; ' "0 0.00. ' . 0.00 0.00 

Ethylbenzene - • . ;0.' 0.00 : i0;00 • 0.00 

Total Xylenes, ' 0 ^ 0.00 

' o:oo 0.00 

Naphthalene 0:143 0.00000014 . •o'oooiso 0.30 

TPH-G 19.2 0.00001920: .: '0i020102 40.20 

TPH-D : ' 367 0:00036700 ' 0.384249 768.50 

.^H::ti;i4.:i 

Total HC Mass: MTBE Benzene Toluene ^ • Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Naphthalene Total HAPs Total TPH 

Biocell: 0.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 i ;:0.00 0.30 0.30 808.70 

Underwood Environmental Consulting, Inc. 
fi 

E O 

£ m 

< 

o 

< £ 

0) > 

e IS 

"2 ^ o o 

T- in 

(\i ^ ^ 

* o 

IV ra 

Z O 

—. 0) J3 o 

p N — -

XI -c _ x: n ^ 

o =5 

(D :5 

c E o c w 

Dl D) (0 

Dl Dl oi; 

r^ 00 o 

r~^ w 

C C Dl 

£ 0) o m cz — 

(D (Si O 

^ N m 

g 

Dl Dl o 

3 3 JO 

O U 3 

_o _a) _o 

o o ns 

2 ^ O 

:E g ^ 

o ^ 2 g 

O o 

* w 

o 

^ E 

ir 

II 

a: a: 

LU a} 

I ^ E 
TABLE 5.4 

Frequency of Detection of VOC Analytes in Soil Vapor 

Building 615 

SWMU-58 Phase II RFI 

Tooele Army depot UTAH 

Noof Noof Frequency of Maximum Mininimum 

Analyte Sarnples Detects Detection (ppfav)^' (ppbv) 

Carbon Tetrachloride 36; , 32 : 89% •:••• • ::: 350 :: •:• ND 

1,1-DCA 36 11 : :31% 100 ND 

1,1-DCE 36 36 100% 1,500 91 

cis-1,2-DCE 36 : ;44% : 5^0 ND 

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 36 6% • ;i4 \: ND 

1,1,-TCA 36 ' -97% ND 

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 36 36 100% 63,000 3,600 

Chloroform 36 .1-5.'. :.. ^^•46 ND 

ppbv = parts per billion volume. 
Initial Screening Levels 

November 1, 2005 

Contaminants* Groundwater 

(mg/L) 

Soil 

(mg/kg) 

Benzene 0.005 0.2 

Toluene 1.0 • . . . •••9: :^ 

Ethvlbenzene 0.7 • •••5; 

Xylenes 10.0 /; • 142 

Naphthalene 0.7 •5.1' 

Methyl t-bytyl ether (MTBE) ^ : 0.2 0.3 -

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

(TPH) as gasoline 

\ 150 

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

(TPH) as diesel yy 500' 

Oil and Grease or Total 

Recoverable Petroleum 

Hydrocarbons (TRPH) 

i d ' 1000; 

Tier 1 Screening Criteria 

November 1, 2005 

Tier 1 Screening Levels are applicable only when the following site cofiditions are met: 

1. ) No buildings, property? boundaries or utility lines within 30 feet ofthe highest 

measured concentration of any contaminant th at is greater than the initial screening 

levels but less than or equal to the Tier 1 screening levels AND, 

2. ) No water wells or surface water within 500feet of highest measured concentration 

of any contaminant that is greater than the initial screening levels but less than Or 

equal to the Tier J screening levels. 

Contaminants * Groundwater 

-(mg/L) 

Soil 

(mg/kg): : 

Benzene 0.3 . ' 0.9 

Toluene . • •• . 3 25..-^•:• > 

Ethylbenzene 4 :-.23- ,:• : 

Xylenes 10 : 142 

Naphthalene 0.7 51 • 

Methyl t"butyl ether (MTBE) 0.2 0.3 

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

(TPH) as gasoline 

10 1500 

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as 

diesel 10 5000 

Oil and Grease or Total Recoverable 

Petroleum 

Hydrocarbons (TRPH) 

10 10000 
/ ; Ib/hr removal of a 65 gprn air stripper with 100% removal efficiency 

y ' 

i y lb VOC/hr = 65 gal/min * 111.033 mg voc/ I w * 3.785 I/gal* 1.0 * lb /453592 mg*60 min/hr 

97% 99% 

Uncontrolled Controlled Controlled Threshold 

lb VOC/hr = ^ 3.61 0.11 0.04 

tonVpG/yr= 15.83 0.47 0.16 5.0 

lb Benzene/hr = 65 gal/hr * 30.633 mg ben/I w * 3.785 I/gal* 1 * lb /453592 mg 

: :97% ; . 99%; •• 

Uncontrolled Controlled Controlled ETV ^J^^^ZO^ 

Ib Benzene/hr = 1.00 0.030 0.010 0.027 ^ 

lb Benzene/yr= 8732.91 261.99 87.33 ^^^'^oyo^^^S 

':'.r. ;.."': . <.9o y ^-

: lb Ethylbenzene/hr = 65 gal/hr * 0.639 mg EB/I w * 

- - .' • 97% \ . - 99% 

UncontroWeci Controlled Controlled ETV 

Ib Ethlybenzene/hr = 0.02 0.001 0.00 22.1 

Ib Ethlybenzene/yr= 182.17 5.47 1.82 

Ib Toluene/hr = 65 gal/hr * 36.066 mg tol/ I w * 3.785 I/gal* 1 * Ib /453592 mg 

97% 99% 

Uncontrolled Controlled Controlled ETV 

Ib Toluene/hr = 1.17 0.04 0.01 3.8 

lbToluene/yr = - 10281.75 308.45 102.82 

lb Xylene/hr = 65 gal/hr * 8.546 mg Xy/ I w * 3.785 I/gal* 1 * Ib /453592 mg 

97% 99% 

Uncontrolled Controlled Controlled ETV 

Ib Xylene/hr = 0.28 0.01 0.00 22.1 

lb Xylene/yr = 2436.31 73.09 24.36 

lb Napthalene/hr = 65 gal/hr * 0.0047 mg Napth/1 w * 3.785 I/gal* 1 * lb/453592 mg 

• 'i'"y) 97% /: .^: 99% \ i 

Uncontrolled Controlled Controlled ETV 

Ib Napthalene/hr = 0.0002 4.54E-06 1.51E-06 2.7 

Ib Napthalene/yr = 1.33 0.04 0.01 

Notes: 

Constituents based on analyses of water dated 7/27/2010 

raBORWTORY, 

LT Environmental, inc. 

4600 West 60th Avenue 

Arvada CO 80003 

Chris Shephard 

Project Number: BBCI007 

Project: BBC • Dry Canyon Comp 

'Statin" 

RW03 

7/27/2010 12:00:00PM 

Analyte Result 

Reporting 

Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Notes 

GBTEX « Napthalene by EPA 8260B 

Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 92100 

Origins Laboratory, Inc. 

X00722O-O2 (Water) 

ug/L 100 07/29/2010 08/03/20)0 

Benzene 21300 2000 II 2000 11 11 

Toluene 31700 2000 II ., : " 08/02/2010 

Ethylbenzene 657 100 II 100 „ .1 1 

b-Xylene 3280 2000 II 2000 

m,p-Xylene 5580 4000 II 

. " 

Naphthalene 4.89 1.00 II 1 . " 

Surrogate: l,2-Dlchloroethane-d4 107% 70.3-128 

Surrogate: Tofuene-c/8 96.8% 78.8-125 " " . " 

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.9% 75.5-131 n 

Origins Laboratory, Inc. 

Noelle E Doyle, 

The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in 

accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical 

report must be reproduced in its entirety. 

Page 5 of 10 

in H 

H ? 

< w 

•a ^ 

3 

^ ffi 

DO m 

05 w ^ p p 

O ..^ O O «D 

OOO O 

b b b b 

to o o o 

ro ^ CO o 

z o o 

S o o 

CO o 

03 Ol 

w p - EE 

r- r- > w O TJ 

a a o i ffi' 

fij « 3 <» 3 a 

3 g cn 3 2, 

3 3 ;:v w 3 O 

a > Si » 

OD O 03 

* e 3 

a; B 

w $ £ ^ 

CP 5^ 

p-'OMOpp p 

bcxiroajbbto- ' 

OOO O O O g> 

4:. to 

cn -•• 

3 

03 (JI 

J3 = S= C 

CD » 

3 

o o o-

<o to 

0) SB -. 

3 3 i 

?L ^ 

eL 5 £ ^ 5 Q. •< 

=3 ? sr 3 

S o . 

S 3 

O ;g O (gym 

So ? 

M C <fl 

=• 2. o 

*< o 

c a 

1 

O 
AS SVE Pilot Test Summary Letter Report 

Hartman Property Pipeline Release Site 

AS/SVE Test 

Gnce general operating parameters were established from the AS only and SVE only 

tests, both AS and SVE were performed together. During the combined test, an AS flow 

rate of approximately 35 standard cfm (scfm) was maintained at approximately 17 to 20 

psi. The SVE was maintained at approximately 215 actual cfm (acfm) at a vacuum of 

approximately 5 in WC. 

2.2 FIELD SCREENING 

Soil vapors were field screened with a photo-ionization detector (PID) to measure relative 

concentrations of volatile organic compoimds (VOCs) in the trench SVE effluent. Field 

screening measurements were collected at the SVE header and recorded on field data 

sheets. During testing, the SVE effluent FID readings did not register above 0.0 parts per 

million (ppm). 

2.3 VAPOR ANALYTICAL SAMPUNG 

Vapor samples were also collected from the SVE header during pilot test activities for 

laboratory analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and total 

petroleum hydrocarbons - gasoline range organics (TFH-GRO) constituents using United 

States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method TO-15. A total of 4 samples 

were collected, including one (SVE-1) at the termination of the SVE only test and three 

collected at intervals (beginning, middle, and end) during the AS/SVE test. Samples 

were collected using laboratory-supplied 1 liter summa canisters. Analytical sample 

results are summarized below: 

Constituent 

Constituent Concentration (Mg/m^ 

Constituen Constituent SVE-1 SVE-2 SVE-3 SVE-4 

SVE only AS/SVE (start) AS/SVE (middle) AS/SVE (end) 

Benzene ::,-.:.::4 9,230:.::^..-.:, 5,080 

Toluene 114 ND ND ND 

Ethylbenzene ND ND : ND ND 

Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND 

TPH-GRO 4,280,000 329^000 : 151,000 94,500 

Notes: 

TPH-GRO - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbpns 

(ig/m^ = Micrograms per Cubic Meter 

Gasoline Range Organics 

An analysis of the vapor analytical results is provided in Section 3.0. 

2.4 PRESSUREA^ACUUM INFLUENCE 

During all phases of the pilot test, vacuum and pressure levels were measured at 

surrounding monitoring wells, including Hartman-MW-10, Hartman-MW-11, HartmanMW-12, and Hartman-MW-13 (Figure 1). Measurements were collected at each 

wellhead using magnahelic vacuum/pressure gauges. When evaluating the field readings 
O 1- 1^ 00 CD 

b 'P LT) CD 

'J- m UO o 

CO o cj> .r^ CD CO CO 

CD m Tl- CO 

CO CO o t-- cn 

^1 

0 

=1 o 

JCl CD 

X3 

c _ 

O 0) 

E Z 

o 

ffl 0) 

QJ O' 

E £ 

^ O 

S 03 

OOOO O 

cn 03 o m 

Tj- CM 

b 1-

TfCDOTtLOCDCDO O 

1- ID c\i cr> 

U J I N 

s " 

CO 03 o m 

r^i u; UJ 

V- OvI OJ 

CD m CD CD TjS - o 

^ Tt 1- CD 

^- CD cn _ 

^ 3 CM in 03 

r- (O o CD 

^ XI D CD 

^ E E 

03 

E 

5 03 Cfl 

03 0) 

'fi m n n 

CO CO CO 

X b CO 

Ul m o 

< „ 

Z o 

O ITS CD 

OOO O 

CviT-Ot-cX303CM O 

p CO 03 Tt O S _ S M ^ 

2 > 

c c 

c t ra 

> — -

Ml O O) 

0) O 

< T W 

E = 

cDTtocnN-cDi^c o 

cd 9 1^2 

CD to ••- CD (O 

O ^ csi T^ " 

CD v- IT) 

0 £' l I ro ^ ^ 

CD UJ _l 2 Z I- X 

^ Q- ^ 03 TM 

CDoOOOlfiCDCOC O 

h~cDocoir3cna3-i -

cor\ibT^T-r-^r^cv j 

cu +1. ^ N 03 

<i> <^ S ro 

03 m ^ 

- -o -5 ^ f- ro "rt^ "-^ — .iii 

03 £ <u 03 CD o >. 

cn LJJ _] 2 Z H X 

OJ o 

cc 

" " C m 03 

13 § o CT y 

o o 00 O CD 

in LO o o 

CO ^ 00 o 

T- o o 

ro 3 

ro 0) . . if 03 

ro 15 Q 

2 •§ c E E 

"S £ m ro 05 

.0. ro Q g - ^ 

t: 0) 

>• "S £ 

03 £ S CD LU _l S 

£ C 03 1-

03 C — 

CL ^ ^ ro 

ro o >. o 
ooooo o 

CO 

CO CD CD CJ) 

00 CNJ CD CD 00 00 

t~-- CJJ O O CN CO 

OOO O 

OOO O 

OOO O 

o o o 

Tt O OD O 

IT) O o o o 

CD CD CD CD CD 

un o o To o o o 

OOO O 

OOO O 

CNJ o o o 

CJ) CD ^ 

00 Csl CO CX) 

o 

^ o 

r o CD 

TjCD i n 

LiJ LU 

< < 

> > 

OOO O 

O O Tt CO 

CSJ CD CO CO 

00 o 00 CD [71 r n 

CNII rr oo\ rr CD\ /v- CO i l-U tJ J 

CD CM CO TjCD" CD" CSJ 

CO Tt CSI o 

CO CO i n Tt 

3 3 

_ l _ l 

< < 

> > 

OOO O 

CD O O O 

CO O LD 00 

CSJ T - CNJ 

^ ^ T t T t 

o 

a 

OOOOO O 

OOOOO O 

in in in in m in 

in o 00 

o E i n i n CNI CD 

c n i CD i n CSJ o 

CD CNJ 1^ < < 

5 0) 

p 0 

CD O 

s •§ 

to O 

0 CO 

£ 00 

CM 

ca o 

O cr D 

. y CD 

E ^ 

11 

o 

CD 

W 

O O O CJ) 

OOO O 

CD 

OJ O 

m tLU 

>. CD Q. CQ 

£ ">^ CD H 

LU X Z ^ 

m ^ CD ^ TJ CJ 

o -§ 1 i 8 ^ 

^ O C CD CL "O 

"in CD 0 (D 0) (D 

CD C C C C C 

m O O O O O 

D >^ 0) Q 

O : £ >^ CO 

t- tu X z 

LU 

Q. CD X 
o 

c 

di 

c 

3 

in 

c 

o 

o 

"TO 

c 

01 

E 

c 

o 

'> c ro IU 

ToJ 5 o elt 

i 

c <t> ) 

p0> in u 

< 

o 

o 

LL Q: 

3 i : 

E ••= 

a> E 

CSlTtOOOJ^TtTtT -

JD 03 

t 03 

03 

03 CQ 

K l == 

ro 0) 

">,£' = 03 

^ -O . C 03 C 

£ S .g ro o >, 

UJ _i 5 Z H X 

y CD C75 ro 03 

- § O O g - 03 

o 15 1^ c/> E 

CSI CO O ••r-

^-- Tt CO Tt CD 

00 •<-•<- in b 

CO oo 

ai r- •<-

csir^joooiocsio o 

cooocsitOT-mL O 

bTtbbcoiriiri b 

JD 03 

t l 03 

03 m 

9,5^0 3 1-

fl)£cu.£roo>.o 

CQUJ_lSZl-XI -

03 tfl 

O i ! D. CO . b 

cn o oo o Tt 

rsl in o o CSJ 

ro 0) -

ro ro 

Q C « 

o E 0 

0) ro o 

. < Q 

E E 

o o o o 

N T3 x : 

S £ S I ro 

03 LL 

C 03 I— 

OJ C — 

^ ^ ro 

o >. o 

I- X H 

m E 

.« > 

H Ul 
» f t -y »• y:' 

>.>»>*>»>» 

m ni CD (0 <Q 

^ : a 5 :o TD 

CO CO CO . ?5 <^ 

E E E E E 

• u o u u 

C\J CVJ' <D CD Tt 

CO "d- CO CM 

rri cy , <a 0> N 

°? CO t 

T- CSI (D lO 

(Q tp (0 CO ro 

?5 CO ? i CO CO 

E E E E E 

lO 00 

l o i n CO CSJ 

CO lO CO t o 

Tf Tt CO i n 

O O CVJ o 

OOO O 

d o' d d 

II II II II II II II II II II 

• 

1

;

c>•%>.>t

to

D

o

 c

 tf> </>

 5

 E

 (0

 5

 c c

 rororo 

 E E

 -

 U3 

o

 c 

 5 

 E 

. 

OOOO O 

Tt Tt Tt Tt Tt 

Tf Tt Tt Tt Tt 

X X X X X 

CO ro (Q ro ro 

0} ii>. 03 Q> q) ^ ^ ^ ^ 

CO CO CO CO CO 

E E E E E 

u u u u u 

<D C4 TT to 

(D to in (o f> 

1^ °i (6 ^. 

S

T- <D CO O) 

in m to tsi 

eo CO in CO to 

Tt Tt CSJ i n 

II II II II II 

CO ro ro to ro to 

S S S S S & 

in. in u> co 

o CM h- to in o> -

(s, CO Tt t o Tt l O 

S

. T - Tt CD OO, CO 

CO t o . a CO 

T - CO o : CO o . IO 

o oo o o o 

II II1 II . II 

tn 

00 o 

f CO 5 

o o 5 

u): to o> oo r^.j 

03 01 01 03 01 

£ E ^ E E 

:E ;£ I ;§ ^ 

CO CO CO CO CO 

E E E E E 

to to to CO CO 

X X X X X 

CO to 

E ^ 

1 1 

CO to CO 

.e .E ^E 

to CO 

E E 

?3 

u u u O § 

lo to cn 00 N. CJ r-~ oo Tt in 

CM CM ts|: T- F) 

OOOO O 

0) 

£ Q 

O tM 

2 

w £ i2 

O 0) <u 

I I 

.et c 

y o 

O 3= (U 

(U N 

C C 

0) 0> 

>. 5 £ >> 

« £ 

O IU 

c ^ .9 .E m aj ^ S E 

Q £ .Q 2 in 

*H ai «o 

> ^ ^ ^ ^ 

rororororo 7S75'5" 5 

TDTJ-OTJT J 

m in tn m in 

CD (D to CD t o 

t o CO to CO CO 

X X X X X 

>»>.>»>,>, 

roro ro ro ro 

p p p TJ TJ 

tsi tSJ 00 t o Tt 

OOOO O 

CD •> O l O) Ol 

CO to 

E ^ 

^ O l 

£ E 

CO CO CO 

^ .§ ^ 

O} o> o 

E E E 

O) >» >» >» >* >» —i ro ro to ro ro ro 

» p 5 p 5 5 TJ S J3 .a J3 J3 ja B OJ ~ 

C3L tn in to T- oo CM 

o o o to to o o 

tt T— i n CM 1» y iii T- to to •«-

Tt O) T— O) T- Tt 

O to o O O T-

' ~ O o o o 

E h- tsi ^ «! . . . . 

g to 0> o . o o o 

II II II II II 

tn t» CO 00 tn E 

o> tsj CO to CO .9 

to to CSI eo Tt -JS 

o oo O) to IO E 

T- m to CO -2 

tn tj) T- o T- S 

o o •>- o o 8 

o <=>. °. d c 

OOO O Q II II II tl II 

II II II II II 

r>. to Tt Tt <5 " T- CO in m * CSJ to o g 

in o CO to cn 1^ Tt CO og ^ T : 

3 , >>>.>>><> > CQ ro ro ro ro ro E 5 5 TJ p 5 

03 O l "5 l OJ D l 

E E E E E 

^ tj) m CO 

Q •<- O ^ - CM 

t o CJ> N . 00 

Tt CM t o O •<-

O OO CO CD 

O ) O ) 1 - T - T -

co to .y tjj CJl o to rv. 

E ^ CO t o Tt p 

o 

03 0) 

J= >» 

¥ £ S c 

o 

0) <D . . 

>. s « S >» ffi "St JZ ro OJ i s c 

m § 2 E " ^-I 

8 £ Q 2 « i 

T - IB CM -S} CO 3 E 

r-- S -•• P T-- p . 

C C T -

u w — 

c ^ o E o 

gUJ ^ « a! S ro E In t a>; ° 

s ^- ^ 5 81 

1-^3 

Q, 5; Tt 

« CO lli 

2 .g 

01 

UJ « 

Q £ LJ 

T-^ <U csl 

0) 0) . 2 

£ > 1: OJ £ ? O 0) *f. 

o E 5 

€ o ^ CJ -5 1= 

2io<gQ£ Q 2 in 

•55 co" ro T-^ 03 CSI -5 cq[ 

< ^ := 
I" 

CO CO 

B g 

to oo 

p 

O CO 

— s 

S o> 5 

°. n ¥ 

O CO to 

its 

S S £ 

I f 

S 

O o 

01 

e 

to O) 

§ o 

s g I 

o o ° 

to 

II II 

•a 5'