alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 In connection with the annual report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated: December 29, 2010
/s/ Sam Shlomo ElimelechSam Shlomo Elimelech, PresidentDated: December 29, 2010
/s/ Gai Mar-ChaimGai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer (principal financial officer)
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 21

- 3083

___________________________ Nyamuoch Thomas Duoth

Petitioner

v.
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

Respondent

____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________
Submitted: September 23, 2022 Filed: November 10, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nyamuoch Duoth wants to remain in the country, but t he Board of Immigration Appeals denied her request for asylum and withholding of removal.
She sought asylum e ven though she “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly c ause [ d] bodily injury” to a police officer

. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28

- 931 (1)(a) . And she thought-2- withholding of removal was available becaus e she would allegedl y face ethnic persecution if she returned to South Sudan

. W e deny her petition for review.

Duoth’s prior conviction makes her ineligible for asylum unless the version
of the crime she committed required only reckless conduct

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2) (A) –(B); see also United States v. Garcia

- Longoria , 819 F.3d 1063, 1067 (8th Cir. 20 16 ) (holding that “the mens rea alternatives in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28

- 931 (1) are ‘alternative element[s] in a divisible statute’” (citation omitted)). Even assuming we can consider the police report describi ng the crime

, it says that she

“ ma[de] threats to kill ,” “attempt[ed] to punch” officers

, and “kicked at” one of them before “spit[ting] in [ her ] face .” These acts are at least as likely to have been committed intentionally or knowingly as recklessly. Se e Pereida v. Wilkinson , 141
S. Ct. 754, 763 (2021) (explaining that when, “as here, the alien bears the burden of proof and was convicted under a divisible statute containing some crimes that [bar relief], the alien must prove that his actual, historical offense of conviction isn’t

amon g them”). So asylum is off the table.

The same goes for withholding of removal

. To rece ive this type of relief

, Duoth needed to establish a “clear probability” of ethnic persecution

. Ming Ming Wijono v. Gonzales , 439 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing for substantial evidence). The record, however, supports what the agency found: violence in South
Sudan affects everyone regardless of ethnicity

, opposing factions have entered into a peace agreement , members of Duoth’s ethnic group hold top government jobs

, and
her mother visited the country safely. On these facts, it was reasonable for the Board to conclude that Duoth was not entitled to withholding of removal

. See id. ; Supangat
v. Holder , 735 F.3d 792, 796 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam ).

We accordingly deny the petition for review.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4926 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4926

   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
                           women's footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Harris (for himself and Mr. Carney) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
                           women's footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.75 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain women's footwear 
with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20/pair'' and inserting ``$24/pair''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February
      28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, E. Del Thachuk, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date:
      April 10, 2006





E.
      DEL
      THACHUK


E.
      Del
      Thachuk


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director











-1-
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

KATHY A. MORRISON , Petitioner ,

v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT , Respondent.

__________________________ 2013

- 31 33

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DE0842120298 -I-1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Kathy A. Morrison moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon consideration thereof , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 13-3133 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 06/20/2013MORRISON V

. OPM 2

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s23 Case: 13-3133 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 06/20/2013
Exhibit 4.373

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169456 dated January 19, 2019

 

To render

 

intra zonal communications services

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

January 19, 2024

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 735-рчс dated October 18, 2018

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance

 

CapitalOne Auto Finance, Inc.

3901Dallas Parkway

Plano,Texas 75093

 

And

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank

StructuredFinance

4New York Plaza

6thStreet

NewYork, NY 10001

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report of Management on Compliance*, thatCapital One Auto Finance, Inc.(“COAF”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CapitalOne Financial Corporation, complied in all material respects with therequirements of Sections 2.4(a),2.4(b), 2.4(c), 3.7, 3.8, 3.9(a), 3.11, 4.2, 4.3(a), 4.5, 4.6, and 10.2(e) ofthe Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 7, 2005 regarding the Capital One Auto Finance Trust,2005-A Class A Notes (the “Agreement”), which was filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on Form 8-K on April 12, 2005, for the year ending December 31, 2005. Management is responsiblefor COAF’s compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on management’s assertion about COAF’s compliance based on ourexamination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about COAF’s compliance withthose requirements and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on COAF’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that COAF complied with the aforementionedSections of the Agreement as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 
| /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
| March  15, 2006            |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         149,648
<SECURITIES>                                   24,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  396,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50,881
<INVENTORY>                                    176,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               831,753
<PP&E>                                         718,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                 524,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,030,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          332,436
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,651,835
<OTHER-SE>                                     (989,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,030,808
<SALES>                                        491,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               521,682
<CGS>                                          75,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               529,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (84,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (84,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (84,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.005)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4695 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4695

     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
            Clothianidin and Bacillus Firmus strain I-1582.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
            Clothianidin and Bacillus Firmus strain I-1582.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING CLOTHIANIDIN AND BACILLUS FIRMUS 
              STRAIN I-1582.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Product mixtures    4.2%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          containing                                                        12/31/2015
                          Clothianidin: (E)-
                          N-[(2-Chloro-1,3-
                          thiazol-5-
                          yl)methyl]-N-
                          methyl[oxido
                          (oxo)hydrazono]
                          methanediamine or
                          N-[(2-Chloro-1,3-
                          thiazol-5-yl)
                          methyl]-N-{(E)-
                          (methylamino)  [o
                          xido(oxo)hydrazon
                          o]  methyl}amine
                          (CAS No. 210880-
                          92-5), and
                          Bacillus Firmus:
                          BAFI I-1582,
                          including
                          application
                          adjuvants
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.91.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan T. Awde, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Jonathan T. AwdeName:
Jonathan T. AwdeTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:
April 28, 2014




The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4793 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5-Dimethylhydantoin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5- 

Dimethylhydantoin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3-DIBROMO-5-DIMETHYLHYDANTOIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,3-Dibromo-5- 

Dimethylhydantoin (CAS 

No. 77–48–5) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.21.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4793 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiff

v.

GOOGLE LLC, 

Defendant

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No.: 6:20-CV-00101-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC’S FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Google LLC discloses the 

following: Google LLC is a subsidiary of XXVI Holdings Inc., which is a subsidiary of 

Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company; no publicly traded company holds more than 10% of 

Alphabet Inc.’s stock.

DATED: May 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paige Arnett Amstutz

Stephen E. McConnico

State Bar No.: 13450300

smcconnico@scottdoug.com

Paige Arnette Amstutz

State Bar No.: 00796136

pamstutz@scottdoug.com

Scott, Douglass & McConnico, LLP

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2400

Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 495-6300

Facsimile: (512) 495-6399

Case 6:20-cv-00101-ADA Document 21 Filed 05/04/20 Page 1 of 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Page | 2

Stephanie Skaff (pro hac vice)

sskaff@fbm.com

Eugene Y. Mar (Admitted)

emar@fbm.com

Daniel C. Callaway (pro hac vice)

dcallaway@fbm.com

Winston Liaw (Admitted)

wliaw@fbm.com

Laura Pedersen (pro hac vice)

lpedersen@fbm.com

Farella Braun & Martel LLP

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480

Counsel for Defendant Google LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule CV-5, I hereby certify 

that, on May 4, 2020, all counsel of record who have appeared in this case are being served with 

a copy of the foregoing via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Paige Arnette Amstutz

Paige Arnette Amstutz

Case 6:20-cv-00101-ADA Document 21 Filed 05/04/20 Page 2 of 2
#### STOKES v. STATE.

No. 24379.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1949.

*153None on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge;

The offense is burglary, with punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Notice of appeal herein appears as a docket entry, only. This is insufficient; it must be entered of record, which means entered upon the minutes of the court. Art. 827, C.C.P.; Crozier v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 407, 149 S.W.2d 108; Beasley v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 366, 162 S.W.2d 968; Patton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 203 S.W.2d 224.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

•Opinion approved by the Court.