alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jose Angel Landaverde v. Joe D. Gutierrez

Appellate case number: 01-19-00732-CV

Trial court case number: 1139863

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Jose Angel Landaverde appeals from the trial court’s judgment signed September 24, 2019, 

granting appellee, Joe D. Gutierrez, possession of premises in which Landaverde has been residing. 

In the judgment, the trial court set the amount of the bond to supersede execution of the judgment 

at $5,550. 

On October 2, 2019, Landaverde filed a motion in this Court requesting a stay of issuance 

of the writ of possession and for review of the “excessive Supersedeas bond.” The clerk’s record 

indicates that Landaverde has filed statements of inability in the trial court and no order has issued 

overruling his claim of inability to afford payment of court costs. \

Rule 24.2(b) requires a trial court to lower the amount of security to an amount that will 

not cause substantial economic harm to the judgment debtor if the court finds, after notice and a 

hearing, that posting a bond in the amount required by Rule 24.2(a) is likely to cause the judgment 

debtor substantial economic harm. TEX.R. APP. P. 24.2(a), (b). The clerk’s record does not indicate 

that Landaverde has asked the trial court to reduce the amount of the supersedeas bond based on 

his ability to pay and the substantial economic hard the bond will cause. See Law Eng’g & Envtl. 

Servs., Inc. v. Slosburg Co., 100 S.W.3d 389, (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, mem. order) 

(appellate court may not review trial court’s exercise of discretion in setting amount of security 

unless record shows appellant requested trial court first determine sufficiency of bond and trial 

court made ruling); Brady v. Compass Bank, No. 04-19-00021-CV, 2019 WL 1459257, at *2 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Apr. 3, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (appellant does not preserve claim that 

supersedeas is excessive if he does not request reduction of the supersedeas amount based on 

contention that amount will cause substantial economic harm); Johnson v. Villatoro, No. 14-18-

00150-CV, 2018 WL 3848070, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 14, 2018, no pet.) 

(mem. op.) (appellate court cannot review county court’s exercise of discretion unless record 

shows appellant made request to reduce amount of security due to substantial economic harm was 

presented to trial court and ruling made on request).
Because Landaverde has not requested reduction of the amount of the supersedeas due to 

substantial economic harm, we deny his motion to stay the writ of possession and to review the 

trial court’s supersedeas amount. Landaverde may renew his request for review of the supersedeas 

bond if he preserves this complaint by seeking reduction in the trial court due to substantial 

economic harm. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____Justice Richard Hightower________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___October 10, 2019____
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                      
|No chart available.                                                      
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### RILEY v. STATE.

No. 25079.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, *1951.*

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for violation of the liquor laws in which the jury *161assessed the punishment at one year in jail and a fine of $1,000.

The record as brought forward contains no statement of facts nor bills of exception. All the proceedings appear regular in every respect.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-024.                     *Applicant:*                     University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6100.                     *Instrument:*                     Laser Microdissection System.                     *Manufacturer:*                     P.A.L.M. Mikrolaser Technologie, Germany.                     *Intended Use:*                     See notice at 65 FR 51797, August 25, 2000.                 

*Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States.                     *Reasons:*                     The foreign instrument provides: (1) Dissection and catapulting of live cells directly into microcentrifuge tubes for analysis without contamination, (2) high quality microscope optics, (3) selective destruction of unwanted cellular material and (4) microdissection of any shape cell or tissue area. The National Institutes of Health advises in its memorandum of August 10, 2000 that (1) these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use.                 

We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured in the United States. 

Gerald A. Zerdy, 

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-25272 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 31.2



PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Adir Katzav, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2015; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|April 30, 2015 | /s/ Adir Katzav                     | 
|-------------- | ----------------------------------- | 
|               | Adir Katzav
Chief Financial Officer |
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 February 2006 — V v Commission

(Joined Cases T-200/03 and T-313/03) (1)

(Officials - Dismissal for incompetence - Article 51 of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of power - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Equality of treatment - Statement of reasons - Staff report - Admissibility - Legal interest in bringing proceedings)

(2006/C 96/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: V (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent)

Application for

Firstly, annulment of the appointing authority's decision to dismiss the applicant for incompetence and, secondly, annulment of the applicant's staff report for the 1999/2001 period

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.

----
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Virginia Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthTrust Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Wallace D. Malone, Jr., principal executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
    ---------------------------

Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002


                                       40
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Alexander Vesak, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|    | Dated this 27th day of March, 2006.                                                                                                                              

/s/ Alexander Vesak Alexander Vesak
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer


---
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|New York Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|New York Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 165    | 193    | 211   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 208    | 264    | 229    | 295    | 389    | 369    | 457    | 410    | 351    | 368   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 354    | 331    | 329    | 264    | 242    | 197    | 232    | 224    | 218    | 221   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 322    | 318    | 315    | 365    | 324    | 349    | 363    | 376    | 389    | 196   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 281    | 253    | 184    | 144    | 143    | 104    | 120    | 104    | 102    | 81    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 115    | 92     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 35     | 29     | 33     | 29     | 9      | 54     | 30     | 78     | 4      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 10     | 109    | 90     | 82     | 104    | 0      | 73     | 9      | 16    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the six months ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: March 11, 2011
 
 GORDON BROOKE
 B. Gordon Brooke
 Chief Accounting Officer
 Chief Financial Officer and Director


-1-