alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 53    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 83     | 1,259  | 381    | 629    | 150    | 249    | 0      | 89     | 752    | 605   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,727  | 70     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Moira Meltzer-Cohen

277 Broadway, Suite 1501

New York, NY 10007

RE: Langan et al v. Abbott et al

 1:20-CV-275-RP, 

Dear Counsel,

The records of this office indicate that you are not admitted to practice in this court.

Local District Court Rule AT-1(f)(1) states: “An attorney who is licensed by the highest 

court of a state or another federal district court, but who is not admitted to practice before this court, 

may represent a party in this court pro hac vice only by permission of the judge presiding....”

If you intend to represent a party in this case, you must submit to this court a Motion 

to Appear pro hac vice within 14 days of the date of this letter. You can locate a copy of the 

motion on our website at http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/?mdocs-file=2823.

The motion must contain an original signature by the attorney seeking to be admitted pro hac vice. 

Pro hac vice motions signed by one attorney for another attorney will not be granted. If you are an 

attorney who maintains your office outside of this district, the Judge may require you to designate 

local counsel as co-counsel (Local Rule AT-2). 

Please be sure to review the Local Rules for the Western District of Texas before you submit 

your motion, especially Local Rules CV-5 (Pleadings & Filing Papers), CV-7 (Motions), CV-10 

(Form of Pleadings), and AT-1(f)(1) and AT-(f)(2) (Pro hac vice requirements), and standing 

orders for the Austin Division. For your convenience, a complete copy of the Local Rules for the 

Western District of Texas and various forms can be downloaded from our website. 

Please be advised that the Clerk no longer automatically adds non-admitted attorneys 

to a case. Thus, non-admitted attorneys will not receive orders or notices (which may include 

deadlines, hearing dates, etc.) filed in their case. The Clerk will only add said attorneys to the 

case upon the granting of a Motion to Appear pro hac vice.

If you have any questions regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely, 

Christopher James 

Deputy Clerk

JEANNETTE J.

CLACK

CLERK OF COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PHILIP J. DEVLIN

CHIEF DEPUTY 501 West 5th Street, Suite 1100

Austin, Texas 78701

March 16, 2020

Case 1:20-cv-00275-RP Document 2 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 1
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 38     | 46     | 36    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 43     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
June 28, 2012

Ms. Aloha Ley Associate Director Office ofAviation Analysis ath**Floo~.** Room W86-310 1200 NewJerseyAve SE Washington DC 20590 Dear Ms. Ley, l' l \ ,: J,_ 'I I 

# ---- ---- - 

# ---- 

# --- ----- - 

# --

# --- ----- ---·-

:!()():) llip.lumv .!2 \orth fi.o,.hester. 1/,V ;i.)'IU/

The Rochester InternationalAirport in Rochester: Minnesota submitted a Small CommunityAir Service Development Grant in response to the Department's request for proposals under Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069. The $500,000 Grant request will be**combin~9** with $200,000 in local non-airportfunding from Rochester and used to recruit critically needed newair service at Rochester, Minnesota. Air service at Rochester is down about one third in the past three years. It is more difficultto use the local airportfortrips due to cutbacks by both Delta and American. Our economy is very dependent on reasonably priced and readily available,aiF service. IBM in Rochesteris a large research and manufacturing facility. The Mayo Clinic headquarters is also located in Rochester. IBM and the Mayo Clinic, as well as the many local companies that supportthem, need effective local air service to serve their customers. The Mayo Clinic alone hosts over one million patient and patient-related visitors per**year,~**and local air service is essential to a positive patient experience. It is essential thatthe decline in Rochester air service be reversed. OurAirport has talked to several airlines, and one airline has written a letter ofsupportfor our application. I am the Senior Location Executive for IBM in Rochester and Vice President. On behalf of IBM, I urge the Department to award Rochesterthis grant so we can reverse the decline in our local airservice. Thank you. Sincerely,**··~** 

### / J ,'



## . /// l

. 

# r:->7-

.'.1

.., -· ·,_// Walt Ling IBM Vice President, Technical Support Services Minnesota Senior State Executive Rochester Senior Location Executive
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Standard Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the nine months ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date: June 30, 2011





GORDON BROOKE


B. Gordon Brooke


Chief Accounting Officer


Chief Financial Officer and Director








-1-
Ricardo GarzaAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2014

Nos. 04-14-00232-CR, 04-14-00233-CR, & 04-14-00234-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Ricardo GARZA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 413042, 413041, & 413040

The Honorable Michael La Hood, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Ricardo Garza was charged in three separate informations with the offenses of driving 

while intoxicated, possession of a dangerous drug, and possession of less than 38 grams of a 

controlled substance in penalty group 3. This is a State’s appeal from a trial court’s order 

granting Garza’s “Motion to Change Venue.” In the motion, Garza expressly asked the trial 

court for “dismissal of these charges.” On March 11, 2014, the trial court rendered an order 

stating Garza’s motion “should [i]n all things be: GRANTED.” The State filed a motion to 

clarify, seeking to determine whether this was a dismissal, which the State is entitled to appeal 

pursuant to article 44.01(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or merely an order transferring 

venue, which the State may not appeal. The record does not contain an order with regard to the 

State’s motion to clarify, and therefore, the State filed a motion in this court, asking that we abate 

the appeal and order the trial court to clarify its order on Garza’s “Motion to Change Venue.” 

Accordingly, we abated the appeals and ordered the trial court to clarify whether its 

March 11, 2014 order “dismissed” the informations or “transferred” the informations based on 

venue to Medina County. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4(b). We have now received three 

supplemental clerk’s records containing a “Clarification of Trial Court’s Order” signed by the 

trial court on May 22, 2014. In the order, the trial court makes it clear that the charges in the 

three cases are not dismissed, but merely transferred to Medina County, which is the county of 

proper venue. 
Accordingly, because article 44.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure does not 

appear to authorize the State to appeal from a trial court order transferring venue, we ORDER

the appeals REINSTATED, and we ORDER the State to show cause in writing in this court on 

or before June 27, 2014 why these appeals should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If 

the State agrees the appeals should be dismissed, we ORDER the State to file a motion to 

dismiss the appeals in this court on or before June 9, 2014. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5      | 34     | -232  
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 670    | -794   | -43    | -24    | 105    | 3      | -261   | 236    | 125   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 204    | 700    | 234    | -193   | -611   | 389    | -61    | -676   | -60    | 207   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 239    | -127   | 101    | -90    | 46     | 7      | 35     | 54     | 2      | 274   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 111    | 197    | 94     | -8     | 303    | -220   | 33     | 70     | -393   | -1,093
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 723    | 360    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-130147 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2005 (September 20, 2005 as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Note 12) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatoryparagraphs referring to (1) allocations of certain assets and expense items applicable to Horizon and subsidiaries, (2) the bankruptcy filing of the Combined Companies and the fact the combined financial statements do not include any adjustmentsthat might result should the Combined Companies be unable to continue as a going concern and (3) referring to the restatement of the financial statements), relating to the combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries andof our report dated April 22, 2005 (June 8, 2005 as to the effect of the restatement discussed in Note A to the schedule) (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the restatement of the financial statement schedule) relating tothe financial statement schedule of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Coal Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Louisville, Kentucky

March 30, 2006
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4870 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-toric shaped polarized 

materials of more than 80 mm in diameter. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain non-toric shaped 

polarized materials of more than 80 mm in diameter. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NON-TORIC SHAPED POLARIZED MATERIALS 

4 OF MORE THAN 80 MM IN DIAMETER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4870 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polarized lenses, lens 

blanks, wafers, sheets or 

plates consisting of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and 

polycarbonate to be used in 

the production of lenses for 

sunglasses, not toricshaped, with an outer profile diameter of more than 

80 mm (provided for in 

subheadings 9001.20.00, 

9001.50.00, or 

9001.90.90) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 7

Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 3 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 4 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 5 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 6 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 7 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 8 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 9 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 10 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 11 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 12 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 13 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 14 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 15 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 16 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 17 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 18 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 19 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 20 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 21 of 22
Case 6:20-cv-00269-ADA Document 25-8 Filed 07/31/20 Page 22 of 22
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    
    /s/ CARY B. WOOD

Cary B. Wood, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 16, 2009
    
    /s/ GREGORY A. SLOME

Gregory A. Slome, Senior Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 26794.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1954.

*386No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $55.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement
of  Operations  for the Three Months  Ended March 31,  1997  (Unaudited)  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         432,688
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  323,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,554
<INVENTORY>                                    182,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,108,515
<PP&E>                                         631,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 467,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,277,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,503
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,576,670
<OTHER-SE>                                     (456,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,277,361
<SALES>                                        471,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               530,623
<CGS>                                          89,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  89,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               592,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (154,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (154,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (154,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.010)
        


</TABLE>