alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

Corrigenda

----

Corrigendum to the Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/33/05 and EPSO/AD/34/05 to constitute a reserve of Bulgarian and Romanian language conference interpreters (AD 5)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 273 A of 4 November 2005)

(2006/C 70 A/01)

On page 8, under the title ‘B. ADMISSION TESTS’:

for:

‘EPSO is organising admission tests to make a preliminary selection allowing candidates’ access to this competition.

EPSO will decide to organise these tests for the candidates who meet the admission requirements (see A.II) either:

You will be notified of the date when you receive your invitation to the tests.

Admission tests — marking

You will sit tests (a) and (b) in English (EN), French (FR) or German (DE), as specified on the online registration form.

Wrong answers in these tests will not be penalised.

Candidates who score at least the pass-mark in each of these tests will be invited to the oral interpreting tests and to the general test.’,

read:

‘EPSO is organising admission tests to make a preliminary selection allowing candidates' access to this competition.

These tests will be organised on computer for the candidates who meet the admission requirements stipulated (see D, first and second paragraph), at one or more specialised centres in the European Union and in the accession countries (Bulgaria, Romania), depending on the availability of specialised centres for these types of tests.

You will be notified, via your EPSO profile, of the procedure to follow to participate in the tests.

After the tests, the selection board will examine whether the candidates, who scored the pass mark in each of these tests, fulfil the admission requirements (see A. II 1 and 2).

Admission tests — marking

You will sit tests (a) and (b) in English (EN), French (FR) or German (DE), as specified on the online registration form.

Wrong answers in these tests will not be penalised.

Candidates who meet the admission requirements (see A. II 1 & 2) and who score the pass mark in each of these tests will be invited to the oral interpreting tests and to the general test.

INFORMATION NOTE

We wish to inform applicants who have registered for both of the following competitions:
—

EPSO/AD/33-34/05 — interpreters (AD5) for the Bulgarian and Romanian languages

—

EPSO/AD/35-36/05 — translators (AD5) for the Bulgarian and Romanian languages
that they will take the admission tests only once.The marks obtained in these admission tests will count for both competitions, according to the specific rules of each competition.’

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5020 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5020

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of fungicide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2012

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of fungicide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FUNGICIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.41 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of fungicide) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4877 

To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Imidacloprid and 

Cyfluthrin or its +-Cyfluthrin isomer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

Imidacloprid and Cyfluthrin or its +-Cyfluthrin isomer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING IMIDACLOPRID AND 

4 CYFLUTHRIN OR ITS +-CYFLUTHRIN ISOMER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4877 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing 1-[(6- 

Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]- 

N-nitro-2- 

imidazolidinimine) 

(Imidacloprid)(CAS No. 

138261–41–3)and (R)- 

cyano-(4-fluoro-3- 

phenoxy)phenyl)methyl 

(1R,3R)-3-(2,2- 

dichloroethenyl)-2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropane-1- 

carboxylate (cyfluthrin) 

(CAS 68359-37-5) or its 

beta-cyfluthrin isomer 

(RS)-a-cyano-4-fluro-3- 

phenoxybenzyl- 

(1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-2- 

(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, including application adjuvants provided for 

in subheading 3808.91.25 3.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 

’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission

(Case T-69/00) (1)

(Non-contractual liability of the Community - Incompatibility of the Community regime governing the import of bananas with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Imposition by the United States of America of retaliatory measures in the form of increased customs duty levied on imports from the Community, pursuant to a WTO authorisation - Decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Legal effects - Community liability in the absence of unlawful conduct of its institutions - Causal link - Unusual and special damage)

(2006/C 48/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) (Monteccchio Maggiore, Italy) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies, Inc. (FIAMM Technologies) (East Haven, Delaware, United States) (represented by I. Van Bael, A. Cevese and F. Di Gianni, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by G. Maganza, J. Huber, F. Ruggeri Laderchi and S. Marquardt, acting as Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by P. Kuijper, L. Gussetti, V. Di Bucci, C. Brown and E. Righini, and subsequently by P. Kuijper, L. Gussetti, V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by R. Silva de Lapuerta, and subsequently by E. Braquehais Conesa, acting as Agents)

Application for

compensation in respect of the damage allegedly caused by the levying by the United States of America of increased customs duty on imports of the applicants' stationary batteries, as authorised by the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), following a finding that the Community regime governing the import of bananas was incompatible with the agreements and understandings annexed to the Agreement establishing the WTO

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 135 of 13.5.2000.

----
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of International Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated this 15th day of April, 2014
 
 
 /s/ R.M. BakerRobert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4824 

To suspend temporarily the duty on non-woven recycled polyethylene 

terephthalate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on non-woven recycled 

polyethylene terephthalate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NON-WOVEN RECYCLED POLYETHYLENE 

4 TEREPHTHALATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Non-woven recycled polyethylene terephthalate 

(rPET)(provided for in 

subheading 4202–92–30) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4824 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### ASHLEY v. STATE.

No. 24472.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

The record as brought forward contains no statement of facts nor bills of exception. The complaint and information are sufficient. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 31     | 71     | 47    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 45     | 60     | 33     | 31     | 38     | 3      | 7      | 2      | 1      | 126   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 40     | 17     | 16     | 0      | 1      | 0      | 2      | 22     | 6      | 15    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 36     | 96     | 146    | 131    | 130    | 144    | 81     | 75     | 32    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 86     | 14     | 37     | 36     | 77     | 3      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6934
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:98-cr-00047-1) Submitted: September 17, 2008 Decided: October 3, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelvin Andre Spotts, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kelvin Andre Spotts appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence and related motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spotts , No. 3:98-cr-00047- 1 (S.D. W. Va. May 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Region II Advisory Council located in the geographical area of Buffalo, New York, will hold a public meeting at 10:00 a.m. on  October 27, 2000, at Fleet Bank of New York, 10 Fountain Plaza, 9th floor boardroom, Buffalo, New York to discuss matters that may be presented by members of the Advisory Council, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration or others present. 

For further information, write or call: 

Franklin J. Sciortino,

District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 111 West Huron Street, Suite 1311, Buffalo, New York 14202, (716) 551-4301. 

[FR Doc. 00-24815 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 

Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00108-ADA

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY

Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Joint or Unopposed Request to Change 

Deadlines, Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) files this notice of agreed extension. On March 

21, 2022, Intel filed its Opposed Motion for Further Claim Construction (DE 117). Plaintiff 

ParkerVision, Inc. (“ParkerVision”) filed its Opposition to Intel’s Motion for Further Claim 

Construction on April 4, 2022 (DE 121). ParkerVision agreed to Intel’s request for a one-week 

extension to file a reply in support of its Motion for Further Claim Construction through and 

including April 18, 2022.

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 122 Filed 04/07/22 Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: April 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ J. Stephen Ravel .

Michael J. Summersgill (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Sarah B. Petty (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Marissa A. Lalli (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Samuel C. Leifer (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Alicia Coneys (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

60 State Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02109

T (617) 526-6000

michael.summersgill@wilmerhale.com

sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com

marissa.lalli@wilmerhale.com

samuel.leifer@wilmerhale.com

alicia.coneys@wilmerhale.com

Todd Zubler (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Isley M. Gostin (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20006

T (202) 663-6636

todd.zubler@wilmerhale.com

isley.gostin@wilmerhale.com

Jason F. Choy (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100

Los Angeles, California 90071

T (213) 443-5300

jason.choy@wilmerhale.com

J. Steven Ravel

KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP

303 Colorado, Suite 2000

Austin, Texas 78701

T (512) 495-6429

steve.ravel@kellyhart.com

James E. Wren

Texas State Bar No. 22018200

1 Bear Place, Unit 97288

Waco, Texas 76798

T (254) 710-7670

james.wren@baylor.edu

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

INTEL CORPORATION 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of the foregoing 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system on April 7, 2022.

/s/ J. Stephen Ravel .

J. Stephen Ravel

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 122 Filed 04/07/22 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                          
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Nebraska Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Texas--RRC District 4 onsh Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Texas--RRC District 4 onsh Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 154    | 305    | 316    | 381    | 500    | 706    | 677    | 689    | 682   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 599    | 608    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023