### 1993 DANGEROUS WASTE REGULATIONAMENDMENTS 

# CHAPTER 173-303WAC AO#92-33

RULEDEVELOPMENTPLAN

Washington Department ofEcology Contact: 

## ty Thomas Hazardous Waste Development and Support Section July, 1992 J ITABLE OF CONTENTS PLAN ELEMENTS: 1. Statutory Authority 2. Reason for Rule 3. SummaryofKey Issues 4. Tribal Coordination 5. Public Involvement Strategy 6. Internal Coordination and Review 7. Assistant Attorney General Involvement 8. Regional Office Coordination 9. SEPA compliance 

### 10. Economic Impact Compliance lI. Ecological Commission Involvement 

### 12. Time Line and Deliverables 

### 13. StaffTime and Resources
- Rule Development 

### 14. StaffTraining needed to implement rule 

### 15. StaffTime and Resources
- Rule Implementation 

### 16. StaffTime and Resources • Total ATTACHMENTS: A. Public Involvement Strategy B. List ofFederally Mandated RCRA Rules Included in this Package C. List of State-InitiatedRules (proposed) D. Timeline 

# c



# o



# o1. Statutory'Authority The Department of Ecology is authorized to adopt rules regulating the generation and management ofhazardous waste by Chapter 70.105 ROW and Initiative 97. Chapter 70.105 ROW (the Hazardous Waste Management Act) was initially passed in 1976 to define and regulate the management of dangerous and extremely hazardous waste (EHY) and to adopt standards for EHW disposal. The Act was later amended to provide Ecology with additional authority to carry out the federal RCRA program inWashington. Further authority to carry out RCRA amendments is contained in Section «3)(d) of Initiative 97, the Model Toxics Control Act. The purpose of Chapter 70.105 RCW is to provide a "comprehensive state-wide framework for the planning, regulation, control, land management ofhazardous waste which will prevent land,air, and water pollution and conserve the natural, economic, and energy resources of the State." The Act also states as its purpose, providing "broad powers of regulation to the Department ofEcology relating to management of hazardous wastes and releases ofhazardous substances. " Section 70.105 ROW authorizes Ecology to establish standards for the safe transport, treatment, storage, and disposal of dangerous wastes as maybe necessary to protecthuman health and the environment and to "adopt rules necessary to implement this section." Section (3)(d) of Initiative 97 authorizes Ecology to "carry out all state programs authorizedunder the federal RCRA, as amended." [ANote on Terms: The terms hazardous waste and dangerous waste basically refer to the same thing. The termhazardous waste is usedby people at the federal level or when speaking about wastes regulated under the federal RCRA Program. Dangerous waste is often used in Washington State to refer to those wastes regulated by Chapter 173-301-. WAC (a somewhat broader category of things than that which is regulated by RCRA). Extremely hazardous waste (EHW) is a subset ofdangerous waste which is highly toxic or persistent or which may cause an extreme hazard]. 2. Reasons for Rule These amendments are being proposed for two major reasons:

1A. First, some of the amendments are required by federal regulation (40 CFR Part 271). This part of the regulation authorizes Ecology through the US Environmental Agency (EPA) to carry out the federal RCRA (hazardous waste) program inWashington. In order to remain so authorized, periodic amendments to the state Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC, are required to keep the State program up to date with the changing requirements ofnew federal laws and regulations. B. Second, other amendments are state-initiated to improve the program. These have been and will be identifiedby Ecology staff, regulated businesses, and the**pub1ic~** The larger State issues to be addressed are transportation ofused oil, designation ofwastes, satellite accumulation, dangerous waste burned for energy recovery, domestic sewage and amendments to siting criteria. The changes ofa minor nature are a result of implementation concerns and technical corrections. Someof these changes are intended" to enhance Ecology's ability to enforce this Chapter of the regulations. The state-initiated amendments are briefly summarized in Attachment C. 3. Summary ofKey Issues The regulation amendments contain the following key issues. "Federal Rules These amendments are needed to retain RCRAAuthorization for Washington. The state rules must be "equivalent" and "no less stringent" than their federal counterparts. More stringent rules are allowed. Alist ofthe federally mandated rules appears in Attachment B. The state version of these rules is anticipated to be essentially the same as the federal language. It shouldbe noted that the most significant Federal issues to be adoptedwill be the Land Disposal Restriction regulations and Corrective Action. State-initiatedRules For the most part, these amendments focus on implementation concerns and clarification of regulatory language. (Alist of state amendments appears in Attachment C). In general, the controversy level of these amendments is expected to be medium for designation ofwaste, sata11ite accumulation areas, dangerous waste burned for energy recovery and transportation ofused oil and low for others.

2**-~--** ------.--- ------- -- 

# c

c



# o

------ -- --**-----~--** ---------4. Tribal Issues and Coordination Aletter will be sent to all 26 Tribal Chairs (with a copy going to the environmental contacts), in the "government" format. This letter expresses Ecology's intention to develop rules and indicates that Ecology staff are willing to meet with Tribal representatives to discuss the matter and listen to their concerns and comments. Further, the Tribes will be sent a FOCUS sheet announcing the schedule and location ofand inviting the Tribes to attend, the public workshops and public hearings. We have contacted Tom Laurie andwill continue to work with him on Tribal coordination. 5. Public Involvement Strategy The public involvement strategy for the entire rule development package is straightforward. Four (4) public workshops are planned for October 1992. Workshop dates are scheduled for: October 13 October 14 October 20 October 21 Spokane Yakima Vancouver Seattle-Tacoma Public comments will be incorporated into the draft rules prior to filing these rules with the Code Revisor. Filing the draft rules is scheduled for December 1992. Four (4) public hearings are scheduled for February 1993. Public hearings dates are: February 9· February 10 February 16

.February 17 Spokane Yakima Vancouver Seattle-Tacoma See Attachments Aand Dfor details. Ameeting was held with Leighton Pratt, SWAC committee coordinator for Ecology to identify the appropriate level of SolidWaste Advisory Committee (SWAC) involvement. We will continue to workwith and through Leighton Pratt on SWAC involvement issues. 3The SWAC will receive the FOCUS sheets and be specifically informed of the public workshop and hearing dates. The Summaryand Draft Rules will be sent to the SWAC. We will offer to present our draft rules to them. We will aslo make phone calls to interested members and inform them of the impending rule development process and sound them out regarding the proposed rules and their level of interest. 6. Internal Coordination and Review The Hazardous Waste Development and Support Section will be the lead on this project. Ty Thomas will coordinate the overall 1993 Dangerous Waste Regulation rule development process. Staff from several programs and sections within Ecology's Headquarters will be involved in the development of these amendments. Staff representatives from these programs and sections will be utilized as liaisons to facilitate review and comment of the draft rules. These representatives will also act as an internal work-group to address the appropriate scope ofthe amendments andwill help draft language for and review new rules. The Program and Section representatives tentatively include: 

# o

Bill Green Julie Cassels ·Laurie Davies KimAnderson Steve Robb Bob Burmark Tanya Barnett Karen Miche1ena HW Information and Planning section Hazardous Waste Permit Section Hanford Section Industrial Section Toxic Clean UpProgram Waste Reduction, Recycling and Litter Control Program Office ofAG HW Dev1eopment and Support section 

# o

Also, meetings will be held with staff specialists in the following areas of Ecology as needed. SEPA Review Section Public Information Office Central Programs Rules Coordinator Briefings will be heldwith the Hazardous Waste sectionheads, Solid and Hazardous Waste Program Manager, Assistant Director for Waste Programs, and Deputy Director.

4 

# o**~--------** -- -----**~-------- ---~-------------** 

- --------- -- --------------------7. Assistant Attorney General Involvement Jay Manning has assigned Tanya Barnett as an Attorney General contact to assist in review of the complete amendment package. Jay has also verbally expressedhis interest and commitment to assist in the development of the needed regulatory changes. Aformal request for his continued involvement on this issue has beenmade by memorandumfrom Tom Eaton to Jim**Pharris~** 8.**Re~ional** Office Coordination Regional office involvementhas and will continue to be a critical component of this rule development process. Regional staffhave recommended many of the changes that will be incorporated into the draft rule amendments. All Regional Offices will review and comment on the draft rule development plan, draft rules, public information documents, and the responsiveness summary. Included in the internal work-group outlined in number 6 above will be a representative from each regional office.**Thes~** representatives include: Jerry French WyaneKrafft Michelle Underwood BobWarren Central Regional Office EasternRegional Office Northwest Regional Office Southwest Regional Office Implementation of these new rules will be the responsibility ofRegional Office staff, Hazardous Waste Permit Section, HanfordSection, Industrial Section as well as, Spills Response and the Waste Reduction, Recycling and Litter Control Program. Hazardous Waste Development and Support Sectionwill provide training and information on the**regulato~** intent and interpretation of these new rules. 9. SEPA compliance AnEnvironmental Checklist will be prepared. From our preliminary review of the checklist and supplement, webelieve that a Declaration of Non-Significance is likely. (See the timeline in Attachment Dfor the timing of the commentperiod). Barbara Ritchie has been consulted. We will continue to work through Barbara on SEPA issues.
510. Economic Impact Compliance Hazardous Waste Development and Support staffwill workwith Cathy Carruthers to meet these requirements. Ameeting with Cathy was held to discuss preparation of the Small Business Economic Impact Statement (SBEIS) as requiredby the Regulatory Fairness Act, and the Ecqnomic Impact Analysis requiredby the Administrative Procedures Act. Anticipated as a result of this meeting, weestimate that it will take four to six weeks of full time staffwork or $10,000 to $12,000 of outside consultant assistance to meet these requirements. 

# o

The options for completing this workwill be discussed with management with a final decision on our approach expected in August, 1992. 11. Ecological Commission Involvement Abriefing will be scheduled for November 1992 with the Ecological Commission. The 30 day Ecological Commission review periodhas been built in to the time-table for this rule development process. 12. Time Line and Deliverables See attachment D 13. StaffTime and Resources
- Rule Development [1.0 FIE
- $64,000.00] 

# o Ty 1/2 time for eighteenmonths
- .75 FIE Chipper 1/2 time for twelve mos. - .50 FIE Ecology review and comment - .60 FIE (Rule Development Workgroup) Subtotals 1.25 FIE .60 FIE Development (HWDSS) Review (Various) StaffTime Total (approx.) -1.85 FIE $ 115,200.00 Resources 

### - $ 4,500.00 (Printing, Advertising, travel, etc.) 

### - $ 12,000.00 (Economic Analysis and SBEIS
- Optional) Resources Total 

### $ 16,500.00 Development TOTAL
- $ 131,700.00 

# o 6

, I I

### r------------~-------------------------------·-------------------------- ---.
__.14. StaffTraining needed to implement rule

FTE HWDSS FTE HWDSS FTE Regional Offices - .04

- .04

- .12 One full day session with each Regional Office (more than one if convenient). Development of training materials and course Five sessions total Oneday for each Regional Office staffperson

- .20 FTE Training Training Total
- .20 PTE
- $ 12,800.00 15. StaffTime and Resources Needed
- Rule Implementation [Note: These are preliminary estimates. Meetings with the appropriate Section Supervisors are being scheduled to attempt to more accurately estimate these figures.] Federal Rules: Land Disposal Restrictions
- 0.5 FTE X 4 Regional Offices

- 0.5FTE Industrial

- 0.5 FTE Hanford Group

- 0.5 FTE Permits 3.5 FTE Federal Subtotal
- 

### $ 224,000.00 Minor State Rule Changes: 0.0 [No Net FTE change anticipated] Transportation ofUsed Oil: Designation ofwaste DWburned for energy 0.1 FTEX 4 Regional Offices

- 0.1 FTE 0.1 FTE 0.3 FTE State Subtotal 

### - $ 19,200.00 Printing and mailing ofnew Regs. 

### - $ 9,500.00 Implementation Total 

### - $ 252,700.00

7**~.** ----- - -- -- 16. StaffTime andResources Total Development Training Implementation Grand Total

8 

### - $ 131,700.00 

### - $ 12,800.00 

### - $ 252,700.00

- $ 397,200.00 

# o

o



# oATTACHMENT A PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY DANGEROUS WASTE RULE AMENDMENTS INTRODUCTION This attachment describes planned activities for public participation in the 1993 Dangerous Waste RegulationAmendments. AI. Who is Affectedby the Rule? All persons living or doing business in**thestate~** Generators in the state who generate dangerous waste on a regular basis and owner/operators of facilities that treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste. About 6500 generators have active identification numbers and may generate dangerous waste periodically (this figure does not include conditionally exempt small quantity generators). A2. How are They Affected? Clarifications and corrections will help businesses comply with the rules and should also help foster a more complete understanding of the requirements. Closing loopholes will lead to more equitable enforcement of the rules and shouldhelp businesses who are already in compliance compete in the marketplace.

.Businesses who are currently not in compliance will be easier to

find andpenalize because of the reduced ambiguity resulting from these amendments. A3. Who is Interested in Rule Development and Review? All of the "notifiers" (active - 6500 people), the "dangerous waste interested parties" (1300 people), USEPA, USDOE, Ecology staff, state agencies, counties, cities, private and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), SAC, business groups and associations, industry, environmental groups, and the general public.

9A4. Why are They Interested? Businesses that potentially generate or manage dangerous waste (a.k.a. notifiers) are interestedbecause they are required to comply with these rules. Compliance involves costs and benefits. These costs and benefits are more fully explained in section 10, Economic Impacts. Environmental groups and citizens who live or work in the state are interestedbecause the dangerous waste regulations are designed to protect their health and the health ofthe environment. AS. Who Should be Involved in Rule Development and Review? Staff from the Hazardous Waste Development and Support Section will have the lead inwriting the Draft Rules. Selected staff from the Sections and Regional Offices identified in sections 6 and 8 above have and will continue to be involved in development and review as members of the regulation amendment workgroup. 

# c

A6. Interested persons from the groups mentioned in A3 above will be involved in writing and reviewing the Draft rules. 

### An infroma1 workgroup formed by the AWB Hazardous Substance Committee has assisted with preproposa1 comment as well as draft rule language. WhenShould They be Involved? Internal people will be involved in the review of internal drafts. This will begin in November 1991. Interestedpersons from the A3 list will be involved in the October workshops and the prefi1ing comment period. Also, these people will be involved in reviewing the post-filing draft (December 1992) and in the public hearing process (February 1991). The Tribes involvement is summarizedunder section 4 above. 

# c

I I 

# t-- I A7. How Should They be Involved? Internal review groups will be involved in reviewing discussion draft and deciding on the scope ofthe amendments as well as revising the discussion draft language.

10 

# cAS. Interested parties from the A3 list will be involved in reviewing the Summaryof the Draft rules after the internal work-group finishes its task. The Summarywill be sent with the announcement of the October workshops. Comments on the Summarywill be a part of the workshop agenda. The Draft Rules will be available at the.workshop. Changes to the·Draft Rules will be noted in the announcement of the hearings. Who Shouldbe Kept InformedAbout the Rule? The A3 list, the Tribes, certain internal programs/sections, the Ecological Commission, SWAC, and Ecology management. A9. How Should They be Kept Informed? They will be kept informed through: The three FOCUS sheets. The Responsiveness andAmendment Summary andWorkshop Announcement. Display Ads·in the newspapers of the cities where the workshops andhearings will be held. Newsreleases summarizing the amendments and the public involvement opportunities. The FOCUS sheet on Public Involvement Opportunities for OctoberjNovember The State Register. Briefings and meetings. A10. Given Available StaffTime and Resources, What is the Optimum Public Involvement Strategy? The de1iverab1es and public involvement opportunities are summarized on the Time1ine (Attachment D).

11I.PUBLIC II.AUDIENCE III.PUBLIC IV.ACfION V.PRODUcr VI.PRODUcr INVOLVEMENT INVOLVEMENT TARGET TARGET OBJECfIVE ACfION DATE DATE Requestfor Pre- Public Publish inState October1991 PublishedRequest October1991 proposalComment Register forCOmments ObtainARCC ARCC MeetwithARCC 2 July 1992 RuleDevelopment 22June1992 Review of Rule Members Plan toARCC Process ObtainPublic Public Hold 4Workshops November1992 Focus Oct/Nov 1992 Comments/lnput Handouts BriefEcological Ecological Briefing Memo January1992 Presentationat December1992 Commission Commission Regularly ScheduledMeeting Inform Public Public Publish rule inState December1992 ProposedRule January1993 Obtainreview and Register Comments Inform Publicof Public Send PressRelease January1993 FocusSheet January1993 Upcoming Hearings Print anddistribute FocusSheet ObtainPublic Public Hold PublicHearings February1993 Handouts March 1993 Review/Comment Overheads onProposedRule Inform Public and Public, PrepareandDistribute March 1993 Responsiveness April 1993 Ecological Ecological Responsiveness Summary Commissionof Commission& Summary indicating CommentsReceived Interested PublicComment& and Ecology's Persons AgencyResponse Response I I 

# c 

# o o

# - e e

I.PUBLIC II.AUDIENCE III.PUBLIC IV.ACTION V.PRODUCT VI.PRODUcr INVOLVEMENT INVOLVEMENT. TARGET TARGET OBJECTIVE ACTION DATE DATE ObtainAdvice and Members Submit FinalProposed AprillMay 1993 Responsiveness May/June 1993 Guidancefrom Rules Summary Ecological Briefing Memo Commission Briefing Memo Inform Public Public Publish Final Rule June1993 FinalRule July 1993 StateRegister InformDangerous Generators DistributeAmended July 1993 AmendedRules August 1993 WasteGenerators 1'80 Rulesand Focus and1'808 Owners/Operato rs
Staff PublicInformationOfficer ProgramManager Date Date

### ATTACHMENT B FEDERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM AMENDMENTS 

# o Revision Checklist Number Federal Requirement HSWA Cluster I FRReference Date
21 22 25 Listing ofEDB wastes 51 FR 5327 Listings ofFour Spent Solvents 51 FR 6537 Technical Correction (Paint 51 FR 10186 Filter Test) 2/13/86 2/25/86 5/28/86
30 Biennial Report; Correction 51 FR 28556 8/8/86 31 

### Exports ofHazardous Waste 51 FR 28664 8/8/86 32 Standards for Generators - 51 FR 35190 10/1/86 Waste Minimization Certification 

# ·0 34 Land Disposal Restrictions 51 FR40572 11/7/86 Hazardous Waste Storage and 51 FR 29430 8/15/86 Tank Systems; Corrections Burning ofWaste Fuel and Used 52 FR 11819 4/13/87 Oil Fuel in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Technical Corrections Land Disposal Restrictions; 52 FR 21010 6/4/87 Corrections

14 

# oFEDERALHAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM AMENDMENTS (cont'd) 

# Ie Revision Checklist Number Federal Requirement HSWA Cluster II FRReference Date

39 California List Waste 52 FR25760 7/8/87 Restrictions 42 Exception Reporting for Small 52 FR35894 9/23/87 Quantity Generators ofHazardous Waste 44 HSWA CodificationRule 2 52 FR 45788 12/1/87 44 A
- PermitApplicationRequirements Regarding Corrective Action 44 B - Corrective Action Beyond Facility Boundary 44 C
- Correctiye Action for Injection Wells 44 D
- PermitModification 44 E
- Permit as a Shield Provision 44 F
- Permit Conditions to Protect Human Health and the Environment 44 G Post-Closure Permits 47
48 50 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Technical Correction Farmer Exemptions; Technical Correction Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third ScheduledWastes



### 15 53 FR27162
53 FR27164 53 FR31138 7/19/88--
7/19/88 8/17/88FEDERALHAZARDOUS**~ASTE** PROGRAMAMENDMENTS (cont'd) Revision Checklist Number Federal Requirement FRReference Date 

# o

------------_.----------------------------------_._---------------------**HS~A** Cluster II (cont'd)
62 Land Disposal Restriction 54 FR18836 5/2/89 Amendments to First Third Scheduled**~astes** 63 Land Disposal Restriction for 54 FR26594 6/23/89 Second Third Scheduled**~astes** 66 Land Disposal Restrictions; 54 FR36967 9/6/89 Correction to the First Third Scheduled**~astes** 68 Reportable QuantityAdjustment 54 FR41402 10/6/89 Methyl Bromide Production**~aste** 

# 0 69 Reportable Quantity Adjustment 54 FR50968 12/11/89 California List**~aste** 52 FR41295 10/27/87 Restrictions; Technical Corrections Identification and Listing of 54 FR4021 1/27/89 Hazardous**~aste;** Land Disposal Restriction--Administrative Stay Land Disposal Restrictions 54 FR8264 2/27/89 Hazardous**~aste** Management 54 FR27114 6/27/89 System: Requirements of Ru1emaking Petitions



### 16 

# o

### ATTACHMENT CPROPOSED STATE-INITIATED REGULATION AMENDMENTS TO WAC 173-303
*********************************************************************** Section Subject ofRule . *********************************************************************** 020 Applicability ofChapter 173-303 040 Definition ofCommercial Fertilizer (new) 040 Definition ofFacility 040 Definition ofLandfill 040 Definition ofSatellite AccumulationArea (new) 040 Definition ofState-Only Dangerous Waste (new) 040 .Definition ofWaste Water Treatment Unit 070 (3)(4)(5) Designation Procedures; testing and "Special Knowledge" 083 DELETE SECTION (Infectious Dangerous Wastes) ***Delete all References to this Section*** 100 Dangerous Waste Criteria (Persistent, Carcinogenic, Toxic, 

### &Mixtures Sections Combined)
*** Delete all References to Secs. 084, 101-103 ***

17110 110 (2)(a) 110 (2)(a)(vi) 110 (3) 140 (3) 180 (l)(a)(b) (e) & (f) 200 (2)(a) 200 (l)(a) 200 (1) (d) 210 (1) 210 (3) 210 (4) 260(1) 

### & (2)(b)(11) 28l(3)(a)(v) 282(2)(b)(v) Quality Control Procedures Necessary for ValidTesting Methods of Sampling- Most Recent Version Required Correction to SW-846Title Availability ofTestMethods Inorganic Waste Def. (LOR) changed from EP Tox to TC Use ofManifest Continuation Sheet for 3rd

### &4th Transporters Satellite Accumulation Requirements Satellite AccumulationWaste Recycled on-site Signs Required at Satellite AccumulationAreas Generator- ManifestMust.be Kept 5 Years Generator- Maintain Test Results for Designation Generator- Recordkeeping Transporter Recordkeeping Maintain for 5 years
Notice of Intent to Site a OWManagement Facility Siting CriteriaApplicability 

### 18 

# o

o

o290(1) 330(2) 330(3) 350(3)(a) Waste Imported from outside the U.S. Personnel Training Plan Records Training Records Kept for 5 Years Contingency P1an- Addition of Spills 350(3)(c) Contingency P1an- Arrangements with Local Authorities 370(4)(a) Manifest Discrepancies 390(4) Facility Reporting- Keep all Reports for 5 Years 400(2)(a) Interim Status Standards (Correct a Reference) 400(3)(a)(iii) Interim Status Standards (Add a Tank Reference) 420. ***Remove all References to*** 505(1)(b) Recyclable Materials "Registered" Chemical Fertilizers 510 Dangerous Wastes Burned for Energy Recovery 600(1) Final Facility Standards- Delete Ref. to 420 6l0(4)(e)(iv) Closure (Reference Corrected) 630(3) Containers- All applicable DW Numbers Marked
19630(6) 630(8)(a) Container Inspections- Inspection Log Requirement Container Requirements- IgnitiblejReactive**~aste** 640(3)(a)(v)(B) Tank System Requirements (Delete Ref. to 420 

### &Clarify) 640(6)(d) Tank System Requirement to Maintain Inspection Log 802(5)(a)(iii) Permits by Rule for Enclosed Treatment Facilities. Elementary NeutralizationUnit, or·**~astewater Tr~atment**  Unit- General**~aste** Analysis added 802(5)(b) Permitby Rule-**~ord** Correction 806(4)(a)(vii) Final Facility Permits (Ref. Corrected) 830 Appendix I G.(S)(d) Permit Changes- (Technical Correction- 40 CFR) 840(2)(b) 900(2)(d) 9903 9904 Decisions on Draft PermitsPublic Involvement (Correction to Reference) Discarded Chemical Products- Addition ofCAS #s PCB- Addition ofcomponents



### 20 

# ('

### ATTACHMENT D SUMMARY OF SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 1993 DANGEROUS WASTE RULE AMENDMENTS May 1992 ACTIVITIES TARGET DATE Draft Rule Development Plan June 1992 Meet with rules coordinator Meet with PIO for Public Involvement Strategy Prepare Public Involvement Strategy Preliminary SEPA Review Scope ofEconomic Analysis (SBEIS) Prepare Public Involvement Documents Meet with Intergovernmental Affairs Rep. Meet with AssistantAttorney General Meet with Internal Work group Draft Rules Present Rule Development Plan to ARCC Internal Review First Smooth Draft ofRules Economic and Environmental ImpactMeetings Internal Workgroup meeting Prepare Workshop notices Prepare Focus Mail Public Notices Public Workshops



### 21 July 1992

August 1992
September 1992-
October 1992

# I Ecological CommissionPresentation SBEIS complete Revise DraftRules Submit rules to OTS for formatting InternalWorkgroup meeting ARCC review draft rules File DraftRules (CRl02, Rules, SBEIS) Rules appear in State Register; Begin commentperiod SEPADetermination Internal Workgroup meeting Mail Public Notices Public Hearings Comment Period Ends Internal Workgroup meeting Rule.andResponsiveness Summary to Eco. Comm. AdoptRules Rules Effective Copy ofAmendedRules available Mail Rules



### 22 November 199'2 

# c December 199:

January 1992 February 19<;
March 1993 April 1993 May 1993 July 1993 

# ()



# o