alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### POWELL’S ESTATE v. MACKEY.

No. 15031.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

March 18, 1949.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1949.

Turner & Turner, of Dallas, for appellant.

Geo. K. Holland, of Dallas, for appellee.

HALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of a district court of Dallas County, Texas, removing appellant, Frank Davis, as administrator of the estate of Gracie Powell, deceased, upon the petition of one Fannie Mackey, sister to Gracie Powell, deceased.

The administrator, appellant herein, did not file an appeal bond. The first question presenting itself here on appeal is whether the administrator could perfect such appeal from such order to remove him as administrator of the estate in question without first giving bond or perfecting his appeal upon a pauper’s oath in lieu thereof.

Appellee’s petition for removal of appellant as administrator of the estate of Gracie Powell could not be construed as filed for any other purpose; in her petition she alleged as a reason for such removal the fact that appellant had failed and refused to pass upon the claim of funeral expenses and expense of last sickness of the deceased.

We find the litigation involved herein personally concerns appellant and it was therefore necessary for him to gjve bond itnder Article 2276, Vernon’s R.C.S. The matter has been settled against appellant’s contention in the case of Wedgworth v. Roberson, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W.2d 427, writ refused, and Stephenson v. Maniré, Tex.Civ.App., 93 S.W.2d 559, writ refused. Our conclusion prevents us from discussing the case upon its merits.

Appellant relies upon such cases as Drew v. Jarvis, 110 Tex. 136, 216 S.W. 618, and Altgelt v. Elmendorf, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W. 412. By a reading of these two cases it is noted they do not concern the administrator personally. The Jarvis case was to withdraw an estate from administration, while the instant case is one to remove appellant as administrator and to appoint another in his place. The Elmendorf case was an action against the administrator in his official capacity to recover a money judgment against the estate he represented.

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted and the cause dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and Co-Chief
Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation
Group, Inc.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                                        
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ William R. Cruz                                    
|Date           |  | William R. Cruz                                        
|               |  | Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|               | 
|August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Ralph L. Cruz                                      
|Date           |  | Ralph L. Cruz                                          
|               |  | Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barbara Mendez, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered June 27, 1989, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.

Defendant claims that the amount of restitution she was ordered to pay was excessive. However, the People agree that in light of this court’s recent decision in *People v Asch*(155 AD2d 735), it is necessary to remit the matter to County Court for a restitution hearing. Here, as in *Asch,*there is insufficient evidence to support the order of restitution. Accordingly, the issue of excessiveness is held in abeyance pending such hearing.

Decision withheld, and matter remitted to the County Court of Chemung County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date: 

October 3, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. 

# Place: 

Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status: 

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. TA-201-72 (Extruded Rubber Thread)(Injury Phase)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its recommendations to the President on December 4, 2000.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: September 22, 2000.
      ( print page 58106)    
By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24909 Filed 9-25-00; 11:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 6      | 0      | 459    | 221    | 140    | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 384    | 803    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### HANKS v. STATE.

No. 26939.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 7, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated upon a public highway is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The instant record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-150441, No. 333-127900 and No. 333-127899) of Warner Music Group Corp. of our reports dated November 24, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of WarnerMusic Group Corp., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Warner Music Group Corp., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008. 

New York, NY 

November 24, 2008 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Brown, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.), rendered on May 24, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of one count of manslaughter in the first degree and one count of manslaughter in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indefinite terms of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years for each count, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we *185perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 13 December 2005

in Case C-78/03 P: Commission of the European Communities v Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum eV (1)

(Appeal - Aid granted by the German authorities for the acquisition of land - Scheme for privatisation of land and restructuring of agriculture in the new Länder)

(2006/C 36/03)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-78/03 P: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Flett and V. Kreuschitz), the other parties to the proceedings being the Federal Republic of Germany (Agent: M. Lumma), intervener at first instance and Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum eV, established in Borken (Germany), (represented by: M. Pechstein) — appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 19 February 2003 — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, K. Schiemann and J. Makarczyk, Presidents Chambers, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, J.-P. Puissochet, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, E. Levits and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 December 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 101 of 26.04.2003

----
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 60    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 65     | 72     | 86     | 102    | 124    | 153    | 147    | 172    | 249    | 329   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 371    | 462    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Madison Explorations, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven Cozine, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: April 7, 2008


                                        By: /s/ Steven Cozine
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven Cozine
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                                        
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Michigan Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4627 

To extend and make a technical correction to the temporary suspension 

of duty on certain cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and make a technical correction to the temporary 

suspension of duty on certain cast stainless steel singlepiece exhaust gas manifolds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAST STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE4 PIECE EXHAUST GAS MANIFOLDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.94 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas mani8 folds) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘9902.01.50’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘8409.91.50’’; and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4627 IH

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                                 
|California Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                 
|California Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 35     | 57     | 42     | 53    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 43     | 9      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>   1

                            [RYDER SCOTT LETTERHEAD]

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the reference in
this Form 10-K of Apache Offshore Investment Partnership to our Firm's name and
our Firm's review of the proved oil and gas reserve quantities of Apache
Offshore Investment Partnership as of January 1, 2000.


<TABLE>

<S>                               <C>
                                  /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                      Ryder Scott Company, L.P.


Houston, Texas
March 23, 2000

</TABLE>