alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc., (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vince M. Guest,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




UNIVERSAL
      BIOENERGY, INC.By
              /s/ Vince M. GuestVince
      M. GuestPrinciple
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
Theorientationofflightswillbesuchthatthepilotincommand(PIC)alwayshas

avisualontherearmountedLEDflightIndicator.

AdditionalsafetyfeaturesontheDJIInspire1include,returntohome,

lowbatteryenergylevel,enhancedfailsafealongwithoperatingintheless

populated5.8GHZfrequencyrange.

2.WhenflyingtheUASwithinthree(3)milesofanairport,airport

operatorswillbenotifiedandtheoperatorwillgivetheright-of-wayto

avoidflyingintheproximityoffull-scaleaircraft.

3.TheradiofrequencyoftheDJIInspire1isin5.725~5.825GHzrange

theFC350camera2.400~2.483GHz.Maximumtake-offweight

approximately3000g.MaxAscent/decentspeed5m/s.Maximumflight

Velocity22m/s.TheUASoperatedbythepetitionerweighslessthan

10pounds,includingallpayload(i.e.camera,lens,andstabilized

gimbal).

4.Pre-flightinspectionwouldbecheckingbatterycondition/levelinboth

thetransmitterandUAS,avisual/operationalcheckofthepropellers,a

visual/operationalcheckoftheaircraft,avisual/operationalcheckofthe

motors,afullcompassandIMUcalibration,avisual/operationalcheckof

thetransmittingradiocontrolunit,avisual/operationalcheckofthe

cameraandgimbalunitandavisual/operationalcheckofthevision

positioningsystem.Acheckforpower-lines,antennasandother

overheadobjectswouldalsobeperformed.Windandweatherconditions

wouldbemonitoredandbeamainfactorforsafeoperatingandflying.

5.ThePICwillbeonlymyselfandIhaveaminimumof55hoursflying

timewithDJIequipment,approximately15ofthosehourswiththis

specificmodel(DJIInspire1).I’mafreelancevideoproducerand

photographerwithover3yearsofphotography/videography

experience.

6.Testing,updatingandprogrammingtheDJIInspire1

firmwarewouldbedonethroughDJI.comwebsiteonamonthlyschedule.

7.Flightswillbeterminatedwhenbatteryenergylevelsreach25%,

allowingsufficientreserveflighttimetosafelylandtheUAS.

8.TheUASwillbeprogrammedsoitwillnotbeoperatedatanaltitude

thatexceeds400feetAGL,andnotmorethan150feetabovea

significantlyelevatedgeographicpositionfromwhichvideography/

photographyisplanned.

9.I’mingoodmedicalhealthandsoundmentalhealthwithnoarrestsor

felonies.

10.TheintendeduseofthisDJIInspire1istosupplementmyexisting

photographybusinesswithaerialphotographsandvideo.Theaerial

vantagepoint/perspectivewouldallowmystudiotoprovideaserviceto

localadvertisingclientsthatisdifferent/uniqueandcompetitive.
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 24883.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 24, 1950.

Victor H. Lindsey, Lubbock, J. L. Bag-well, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The count of the indictment to which appellant pleaded guilty charged robbery and contained the allegation that the $3,-000.00 alleged to have been taken from one J. O. Hutto was taken “with the intent to deprive the said J. O. Hutto of the same, and to appropriate said property to his own use and benefit.”

The identical question raised in the case of Moore v. State, Tex.Crim., 230 S.W.2d 217, is the sole question raised by said appellant here.

The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at eight years confinement in the penitentiary, but the judgment fails to conform to such verdict.

The judgment is reformed so as to adjudge the punishment at eight years in the penitentiary.

As so reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                 
|No chart available.                                                 
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Lower 48 Federal Offshore Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 128 V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL COOK

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 3, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On February 4, 2020

, Michael Cook filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain

- Barré syndrome (“GBS”)

as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 7, 2018 . Petit ion at

1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 30, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent states that “[P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria in the revised

Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation, wh ich affords

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within thi s definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara g raph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

[P]etitioner a presumption of causation if onset of GBS occurs between three and forty

two days after receipt of a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative

cause

. ” Id. at 7 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner ex perienced the residual

effects of his GBS for more than six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 2:11 p.m. on Monday, September 25, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's personnel, resolution, supervisory, and corporate activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. (Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision) and Chairman Donna Tanoue, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no notice earlier than September 21, 2000, of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: September 25, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24997  Filed 9-26-00; 11:40 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 22     | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 48     | 0      | 7      | 24     | 96    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### State ofNew Mexico 

### RECEIVED -c**6P,..~O~~:J** 

### ENVIRONMENT

### DEPART~J!NRANNING**~**

SUSANA MARTINEZ Governor JOHN A. SANCHEZ Lieutenant Governor

Mr. Ron Curry Regional Administrator 

### Office of theSecretary

### 12 OCT
- 9 PM 5. Harold Runnels Building 1190 Saint Francis Drive, PO Box 5469 SantaFe, NM 87502-5469 Telephone (505) 827-2855 Fax (505) 827-2836 www.nmenv.state.run.us

September 26, 2012

U.S. EPA Region 6 (6-RA) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas. Texas 75202-2733 DAVE MARTIN Secretary BUTCH TONGATE Deputy Secretary

RE: Streamlining ofNew Mexico's Transportation Conformity Regulation, 20.2.99 NMAC Dear Mr. Curry: On October I0, 2011, New Mexico submitted to EPA revisions to 20.2.99 NMAC- Conformity to the StateImplementation Plan of Transportation Plans, Programs, andProject, for EPA's approval and incorporation into New Mexico's State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA has not yet acted upon this submittal. The purpose ofthis letter is to request that in reviewingNew Mexico's October 10, 2011 and any future transportation conformity SIP submittals, EPA only consider and act on the three elements (40 CFR § 93.105; § 93.122(a)(4)(ii); and§ 93.125(c)) that are required under CleanAir Act section 176(c)(4)(E), as amended in August of2005 by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), and that EPA take no action on the remainder ofthe State's transportation conformity SIP. As you know, EPA "stronglyencourages states to only include the three required provisions in a conformity SIP to take advantage ofthe streamliningpossibilitiesprovided bythe Clean AirAct, as amended bySAFETEA-LU" in order to "reduce the administrative burden
... by minimize[ing] the possibility ofhaving to revise the conformity SIP each time the federal rule is revised." 73 Fed. Reg. 4420, 4430- 4432 (Jan. 24, 2008). The New Mexico Environment Department agrees that this approach will reduce our administrative burden without affecting the substantive requirements for transportation conformity, byeliminating the need to replicate verbatim the remainder of40 C.F.R. Part 93 in the New Mexico Administrative Code. We therefore make this request, as recommended in EPA's Guidance forDeveloping Transportation Conformity StateImplementation Plans (SIPs), atp. 6.September 26, 2012 Page 2
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Gail Cooke ofmy staffat 505-476-4319 orvia email at gail.cooke@state.nm.us.

DaveMartin Secretary, New Mexico Environment Department
cc: Mr. JeffreyRiley, EPA Region VI Mr. Guy Donaldson, EPA Region VI Mr. TomDiggs, EPA Region VI Mr. Richard Goodyear, Air Quality Bureau Ms. Mary Lou Leonard, Director, Environmental Health Department, CityofAlbuquerque
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 February 2006

(2006/C 37/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Texas Onshore Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Texas Onshore Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 96,052 | 85,735 | 84,723 | 84,386 | 66,970 | 49,175 | 40,862 | 42,219 | 27,544
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 25,662 | 23,067 | 20,760 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4476 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4476

  To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Prodiamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2012

 Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Prodiamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODIAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Prodiamine) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``2.1%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```