alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 
APRIL 4, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                             399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    457,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               857,458
<PP&E>                                       1,355,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 816,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,479,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          292,885
<BONDS>                                        220,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,834
<OTHER-SE>                                     760,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,479,190
<SALES>                                        556,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,736
<CGS>                                          455,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  455,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,905)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.16)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.3




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Global Green Matrix Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 Date:  July 19, 2011
  “Randy Hayward”
 
 Randy Hayward
 President,
 Chief Executive Officer
      This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
1

The Honorable Jon Stuart Scoles, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Northern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2078

___________

Joseph L. Feldpausch, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 1, 2009

Filed: December 4, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Feldpausch (Feldpausch) appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the

denial of disability insurance benefits. His August 2003 application for benefits

alleged a disability onset date of July 1, 1985, as a result of ulcers, migraines, sleep

apnea, night cramps, fatigue, back problems, and pain in his right foot, ankle, and leg.

Following a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined Feldpausch was
-2-

not disabled withing the meaning of the Social Security Act before the expiration of

his insured status in March 1992. The ALJ relied in part on the testimony of a

vocational expert (VE) about the existence of a significant number of jobs Feldpausch

could be expected to perform. After careful de novo review, we find substantial

evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s determination. See Cox v.

Barnhart, 471 F.3d 902, 906-07 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; explaining, to be

entitled to benefits, a claimant needs to prove she was disabled before her insurance

expired); Hilkemeyer v. Barnhart, 380 F.3d 441, 447 (8th Cir. 2004) (deciding VE

testimony constituted substantial evidence in support of the ALJ’s determination that

claimant was not disabled).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4578 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4578

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIADIMEFON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Triadimefon) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.7%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|California Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|California Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 8      | 6      | 10     | 4      | 1      | 46    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 42     | 28     | 23     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2009**

**Registration No. 333-41068**

UNITED STATES
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4593 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4593

          To extend the suspension of duty on acetyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on acetyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.67 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acetyl chloride) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### KIRKLEN v. STATE.

No. 23807.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 26, 1947.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1948.

Davenport & Davenport, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty before a jury, appellant was assessed the minimum penalty of two years’ confinement in the penitentiary for passing a forged instrument.

In establishing its case, the State introduced — among other things — appellant’s written confession, wherein appellant confessed that one Clark forged the check which he (appellant) passed.

In testifying as a witness in his own behalf appellant said that he forged the check — that is, that he wrote it and passed it, knowing that it was a forgery.

The conviction occurred and sentence was passed upon appellant on April 9, 1947. On May 29, 1947, or approximately 50 days thereafter and at the same term of court, appellant sought permission to file and present a motion for new trial in the case. This the trial court refused. Among other things, this motion attacked the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

The foregoing facts demonstrate the sufficiency of the evidence. It is immaterial whether the appellant forged the check or some one else forged it. He knew that it was forged and he passed it with that knowledge and received the money. This constitutes the offense of passing a forged instrument.

*89The other grounds of the motion are based upon equitable matters and addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge — such as appellant’s contention that he was led to believe that he would receive a suspended sentence when he entered the plea of guilty. It is not charged that any officer of the law or of the court caused him to so believe or made any agreement or statement by which he was misled.

There is an entire absence of any proof that the trial judge abused his discretion in the matter.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4611 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4611

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-
                         methyl-1,3,5-triazine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-
                         methyl-1,3,5-triazine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-AMINO-4-METHOXY-6-METHYL-1,3,5-TRIAZINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-methyl-
1,3,5-triazine) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4577 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4577

   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on mixtures 
              containing Isoxaflutole and Cyprosulfamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on mixtures 
              containing Isoxaflutole and Cyprosulfamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING ISOXAFLUTOLE AND CYPROSULFAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.65 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures containing 
Isoxaflutole and Cyprosulfamide) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3.5%'' and inserting ``2.7%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|California (with State off) Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|California (with State off) Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 101    | 90     | 89     | 3      | 2      | 6      | 6      | 4      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, William R. Cruz, Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of
TradeStation Group, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. November 8, 2004
    By:
    /s/ William R. CruzDate
    
    William R. CruzCo-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### ELLISON v. STATE.

No. 23441.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 19, 1946.

Wright Stubbs and Horace H. Shelton, both of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction, is for misdemeanor theft, punishment assessed at 30 days’ confinement in the county jail.

The record contains neither hills of exception nor statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### WAYNE COUNTY v. HOLDER et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 13, 1953.

W. C. Dabney, Monticello, for appellant.

C. C. Duncan, Monticello, L. C. Lawrence, Jamestown, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Holder, Coe and Lawrence, contractors for the construction of a new courthouse for Wayne County, brought an action against the county to recover certain sums alleged to be due under the contract. Upon a jury trial, a verdict was returned for the amount claimed, less the sum of $2,000, which the jury found would be the cost of making repairs to eliminate water leakage in one corner of the building. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the county appeals.

The sole complaint 6f the county seems to be that the contractors, should have been denied any recovery until they repaired the building themselves, rather than allowing the cost of the repairs to be deducted from the balance due them under the contract.

We find nothing in the judgment that is prejudicial to any substantial rights of the county. The sum of $2,000, which the jury deducted from the amount claimed by the contractors, represents the highest estimate, *by*the county’s own witness, of the cost of making the repairs. It is conceded that the contractors substantially performed their contract. Although the contract permitted the county to withhold a portion of the contract price, for one year after completion and acceptance of the building, to secure the county against defects in the construction work, more than one year, had elapsed from the acceptance of the work when this action was brought. We think it was proper to permit the contractors to recover the amount remaining due under the contract, after deducting, by way of damages, the cost of repairing the minor defects in the building. See Cassinelli v. Stacy, 238 Ky. 827, 38 S.W.2d 980.

The judgment is affirmed.

DUNCAN, J., not sitting.