alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4749 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4749

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Di-tert-butyl polysulfides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Di-tert-butyl polysulfides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DI-TERT-BUTYL POLYSULFIDES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Di-tert-butyl       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          polysulfides (CAS                                                 12/31/2015
                          No. 68937-96-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2930.90.91)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4718 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Linuron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Linuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LINURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.24 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Linuron) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT et al. v. STOVALL et al.

No. 14931.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

April 16, 1948.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1948.

Heard L. Floore, Sam A. Woodward, and R. E. Rouer, all of Fort Worth, for appellants.

A. L. Wardlaw and M. Hendricks Brown, both of Fort Worth, for appellees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

The City of Fort Worth has in effect a zoning ordinance, enacted under authority of Acts 1927, 40th Leg., ch. 283, p. 424, Articles 101 la — 1011 j, Vern.Tex.Civ.St. The ordinance provides for a board of adjustment, as authorized by Article 101 lg.

Interstate Circuit, Inc., applied to the city building commissioner for a permit to build an outdoor moving picture theater on a designated 181⁄2 acre tract of land. The permit was denied on the ground that most of the tract was zoned for one and two family residences, and not for commercial uses. Interstate Circuit, Inc., appealed to the Board of Adjustment from the action of the building commissioner. The board entered an order granting the permit to build the theater. Nearby property owners carried the matter to the district court by writ of certiorari. Article 101 lg. The district court held that the Board of Adjustment was without authority to make the order allowing the theater to be built, and set it aside.

The Board of Adjustment was the only party to the suit who excepted to the judgment or gave any notice of appeal.

A party is entitled to appeal only when his own interests, or those of a party with whom he is in privity, are affected by the judgment complained of. He must have been aggrieved by the decision of the court. He may not appeal when his *304substantial rights are not affected. 3 Tex. Jur. pp. *146, 147.*

“As a general rule a court or board exercising judicial or quasi judicial functions, not being a party to its proceedings, and not having any legal interest in maintaining its determination, can neither appeal from a judgment or order of a court reversing the proceedings nor be heard on the appeal.” 4 C.J.S., Appeal & Error, § 205, page 389.

In 117 A.L.R. 216 may be found an annotation relating to the right of a public officer or board to appeal from a judicial decision affecting his or its order or decision.

In several cases it has been held that a board of adjustment established under zoning ordinances similar to the one before us does not have a right to appeal from an order of a court of competent jurisdiction setting aside one of the board’s orders. Appeal of Board of Adjustment, Lansdowne Borough, 313 Pa. 523, 170 A. 867; Miles v. McKinney, 174 Md. 551, 199 A. 540, 117 A.L.R. 207; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 758, 4 So.2d 820; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 766, 4 So.2d 822. The opinions just cited fully discuss the question, and we approve what is said in them.

The appeal is dismissed.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                      
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Montana Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Alaska Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Alaska Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | -7,796 | -5,152 | 782    | -8,322 | -3,585 | -896   | 4,432 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,330  | 2,863  | -3,982 | -317   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                                             
|Texas - RRC District 6 Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                                             
|Texas - RRC District 6 Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 5      | 19    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00184-CV

CITY OF HUNTSVILLE,

Appellant

v.

ROSA SALGADO,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12753CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The City of Huntsville appealed the trial court’s denial of the City’s plea to the 

jurisdiction. The City has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal stating that the City 

no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The motion is unopposed by appellee.

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
City of Huntsville v. Salgado Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 27, 2018

[CV06]
Worksheet Title: HCl Emission Test Results Template Using Method 321

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?Company Name:Facility Name: ReddingAddress: 15390 Wonderland BlvdCity: ReddingState: CAKiln ID:Kiln Type: PHIn-line Raw Mill:Control Device Configuration: 

Parameter

Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test AverageUnits

Units Other 

DescriptionTest Method Used Test Locatio

Select appropriate unit from list. If other is selected please describe units in column H at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used.

Indicate whether the occurred upstream odownstream of a codevice(s); list the codevice(s)

Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/16/2010 3/16/2010 3/16/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis 3.00 1.67 1.60 ppmvd 

Oxygen Concentration - dry basis 11.07 10.72 11.60 %CO2 Concentration - dry basis 16.62 17.18 15.92 %HCl Concentration - corrected to 7% oxygen 4.24 2.29 2.39 2.97 ppmvd @ 7% O2 Method 321 Downstream; Bagh

Exhaust Stream %Moisture 14.0 15.3 15.5 % 

Exhaust Flowrate 133,025 135,639 133,951 dscfm Exhaust Temperature 228.4 227.9 218.0 degrees F Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/17/2010 3/17/2010 3/17/2010

HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis 35.29 16.98 15.91 ppmvd 

Oxygen Concentration - dry basis 9.236 8.914 8.966 %CO2 Concentration - dry basis 19.74 20.16 20.29 %HCl Concentration 42.05 19.69 18.53 26.76 ppmvd @ 7% O2 Mthod 321 Downstream; Bagh

Exhaust Stream %Moisture 14.8 14.5 5.5 % Exhaust Flowrate 115,358 111,530 108,519 dscfm Exhaust Temperature 280.0 281.7 284.3 degrees F Notes:

Facilities that use Method 321 to test for HClLehigh Southwest Cement CompanyIn line Raw Mill/Kiln Baghouse (S260)Enter HCl concentration value in dry parts per million volume (ppmvd). If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]). 

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

Yes

1

Enclosure 5c‐‐ERT Spreadsheet
Exhibit
      32.03











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




















In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of South Carolina Electric & Gas
      Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














Date:  August
                3, 2007/s/William
                B. TimmermanWilliam
                B. TimmermanChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

















































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUL-05-1997
<CASH>                             791,244
<SECURITIES>                       511,386
<RECEIVABLES>                      802,529
<ALLOWANCES>                       250,571
<INVENTORY>                      1,760,300  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 4,399,882
<PP&E>                           7,113,849
<DEPRECIATION>                   6,562,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,540,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,789,945
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                         2,995,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,540,589
<SALES>                          3,717,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,717,763
<CGS>                            1,594,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,594,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    128,521
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                128,521
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       128,521
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4266

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUSTIN BENJAMIN HASTE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00372-NCT)

Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Robert A.

J. Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Vacated by Supreme Court, April 21, 2008
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Justin Benjamin Haste, Jr., appeals his conviction and

180-month sentence after pleading guilty pursuant to a plea

agreement to possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e) (2000). Although Haste concedes he has

two predicate offenses for armed career criminal status under the

Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000), he

asserts that a third conviction for felonious possession of a

weapon of mass destruction under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.8 (2005)

should not have been considered a “violent felony” under the ACCA.

Haste asks the case be remanded to the district court for resentencing without an ACCA enhancement. We affirm Haste’s

conviction and sentence.

As acknowledged by Haste, this court held in United

States v. Johnson, 246 F.3d 330 (4th Cir. 2001), that possession of

a sawed-off shotgun is a “crime of violence” under the U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 4B1.1 (2006). The language

of USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2) the court construed in Johnson (“or otherwise

involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical

injury to another”) is identical to the language of the ACCA’s

definition of violent felony at issue in this case. See Johnson,

246 F.3d at 334 n.5; 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). 

Based on our holding in Johnson, we conclude that a

conviction under that provision constitutes a predicate “violent
- 3 -

felony” conviction under the ACCA. Accordingly, we affirm Haste’s

conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








October
30, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.