alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Renewables: the 

Story of Texas 

Stephen M. Niemeyer, P.E.

Border Affairs Manager

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Washington, DC 

March 24, 2011
Topics

 State Goals

 Wind

 Biomass

 Solar

 Small Hydro

 Transmission

 Other Legislation

 Border Energy 

Forum
State Goals

• Original goal

– Set by Texas legislature in 1999: 2,000 MW of 

new renewable generation capacity by 2009

• Projects that would attain the 2009 

goal were already under development 

by 2005
State Goals

• In 2005 the Legislature set new 

biennial goals, culminating in:

– 5,880 MW by 2015

– A “target” of 10,000 MW by 2020

• Texas exceeded 10,110 MW by end 

of 2010
Wind

• As of December 

2010: 10,000 MW 

of capacity 

statewide

• Matched against 

countries, Texas is 

#6 in the world

Delaware Mountain Wind Farm, 

Culberson County
Biomass

December 2010:

125 MW of capacity 

statewide

Recovery of landfill gas

in Texas
Solar

December 2010:

25.4 MW of capacity 

statewide

Solar array at wastewater 

treatment plant in San Benito, TX
Small Hydro

6 MW of capacity

December 2010:
Renewable Energy, 2010

Renewable Energy Generation in Texas by Technology Type, 2010

Technology Type Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total (MWh)

Biomass 20,974.18 27,768.55 17,407.00 31,384.98 97,534.70

Hydro 196,238.40 133,408.24 192,251.86 87,358.18 609,256.68

Landfill gas 110,510.50 114,893.21 116,789.10 122,711.27 464,904.08

Solar 1,384.67 2,042.38 3,482.94 7,539.44 14,449.42

Wind 6,459,442.33 7,806,011.07 5,307,839.64 7,255,367.29 26,828,660.34

Total 6,788,550.07 8,084,123.45 5,637,770.55 7,504,361.16 28,014,805.22

Biomass

0.35%

Hydro

2.17%

Landfill gas

1.66%

Solar

0.05%

Wind

95.77%

Other

4.23%
What’s in the future?

• Several thousand more MW of wind 

farms could be constructed in Texas

• Also, great solar potential in areas 

overlapping with the windy areas

• But...
Transmission

• Transmission—the #1 challenge for 

wind and solar electricity around the 

U.S.—and Texas is no exception

• 2005 legislation required Texas Public 

Utility Commission (PUC) to identify 

and meet transmission needs for 

“Competitive Renewable Energy Zones”
Progress on Transmission

• Five CREZ zones in West Texas and the 

Texas Panhandle

• Proposed routes for transmission lines

• Decision on allocation of costs

• Negotiations with property owners

• System studies
PACE Legislation

• Legislation passed in 2009 allows 

“property-assessed clean energy” 

(PACE)

Cities can offer financing to homeowners for 

renewable energy and efficiency (recovered 

over time by assessment on property)

• Implementation held up by state and 

federal legal concerns
Border Energy Forum

• Texas General Land Office organizes 

annual Border Energy Forum

• Venue rotates among ten border states

• 18th annual Forum: El Paso, Texas 

October 27-28, 2011

C’mon down, y’all!
¡FIN!

Steve Niemeyer

512-239-3606

Steve.Niemeyer@tceq.texas.gov
#### James SOWERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27103.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

.William E. Hart, Athens, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of wine in a dry area for the purpose of. sale.after a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, six mori'ths in jail ánd a fine'of $300.

The state’s testimony shows that while appellant was driving his automobile on the streets of: Athens, Texas, he was stopped by Joe McGee, Chief of Police, who, on looking in * appellant’s automobile, found eight fifths of' wine on‘the floor board.

On further development of the state’s case, before the jury, the witness J. W. Bro.wnloyv testified to, *3,*poljce radio,^.conversation whicff.fie had with Officer McGee, as, follows,: “I ..radioed him. and told, him that:,I just had 3⁄8 call from.,a lady that James Sowers had just delivered a fifth of wine on North Prairieville was coming back on North Palestine,' if he would cut across and go down that way, he would probably catch him,” ánd to the Introduction of such testimony, appellant objected upon the ground that it. was hearsay, which was overruled, and to ‘ such ruling 'appellant excepted. ;.

This testimony was hearsay arid ‘"should have been excluded from the jury and its admission in evidence calls for a reversal of the judgment. Starkey v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 552, 27 S.W.2d 175; Martin v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 140, 205 S.W.2d 599; and Hodge v. State, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 395, 214 S.W.2d 469.

The court, under the facts of this case, should have heard the evidence in. *120the absence of the jury on whether probable cause existed for the search. 38 Tex.Jur. 98, Sec. 68; and Maxwell v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 190, 51 S.W.2d 334.

The judgment is reversed and remanded

Opinion approved by the court.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4780 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2’-(2-Methylpropylidene) bis(4,6- 

dimethylphenol). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2’-(2- 

Methylpropylidene) bis(4,6-dimethylphenol). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2’-(2-METHYLPROPYLIDENE) BIS(4,6- 

4 DIMETHYLPHENOL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,2’-(2-Methylpropylidene) 

bis(4,6-dimethylphenol) 

(CAS No.33145–10–7) 

(provided for in subheading 2907.29.90) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4780 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Paragon Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Paragon
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                          /s/ William R. Johnson
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          William R. Johnson
                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                          August 14, 2003




                          /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          Ronald J. Semanick
                          Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                            and Treasurer
                          August 14, 2003
Worksheet Title: HCl Emission Test Results Template Using Method 321Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?Company Name:Facility Name:ReddingAddress:15390 Wonderland BlvdCity:ReddingState:CAKiln ID:Kiln Type:PHIn-line Raw Mill:Control Device Configuration:Parameter Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Test AverageUnits Units Other DescriptionTest Method Used Test Location NoteSelect appropriate unitfrom list. If other isselected please describeunits in column H at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used.Indicate whether the testoccurred upstream ordownstream of a controldevice(s); list the controldevice(s)If kiln has an in-line raw mill,indicate raw mill status during tests(i.e., raw mill on or raw mill off).Provide any other informationsupporting information you think isnecessary about this test report.Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy)3/16/2010 3/16/2010 3/16/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis3.00 1.67 1.60ppmvdOxygen Concentration - dry basis11.07 10.72 11.60%CO2 Concentration - dry basis16.62 17.18 15.92%HCl Concentration - corrected to 7% oxygen4.24 2.29 2.39 2.97 ppmvd @ 7% O2 Method 321 Downstream; BaghouseRaw mill onExhaust Stream %Moisture14.0 15.3 15.5 %Raw mill onExhaust Flowrate133,025 135,639 133,951dscfmRaw mill onExhaust Temperature228.4 227.9 218.0 degrees FRaw mill onSample Date(mm/dd/yyyy)3/17/2010 3/17/2010 3/17/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis35.29 16.98 15.91ppmvdOxygen Concentration - drybasis9.236 8.914 8.966%CO2 Concentration - drybasis19.74 20.16 20.29%HCl Concentration42.05 19.69 18.53 26.76ppmvd@7% O2 Mthod 321 Downstream; BaghouseRaw mill offExhaust Stream %Moisture14.8 14.5 5.5 %Raw mill offExhaust Flowrate115,358 111,530 108,519dscfmRaw mill offExhaust Temperature280.0 281.7 284.3 degrees FRaw mill offNotes:Facilities that use Method 321 to test for HClLehigh Southwest Cement CompanyIn line Raw Mill/Kiln Baghouse (S260)Enter HCl concentration value in dryparts per million volume (ppmvd). Ifthe test results are below detectionlimit, please note the detection limitin brackets(e.g., [< 0.010]).Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a responseYes1Enclosure5c‐‐ERTSpreadsheetPage1of1
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

##  

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

##  

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Black Gaming, LLC, a Nevada limited-liabilitycompany (the “Company”), for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Curt Mayer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Curt Mayer                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Curt  Mayer,  Chief Financial Officer  March 30, 2007 |

 

 

The foregoing certificationsare being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 0      | 10     | 181    | 182    | 67     | 168    | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4520 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4520

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 
                               Chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 
                               Chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-CHLORO-6-FLUOROBENZYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.70 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 
Chloride) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER 

KING FOR WRIT OF 

MANDAMUS 

§ 

§ No. 278, 2020 

§ 

§ 

Submitted: September 1, 2020 

Decided: October 8, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES 

Justices. 

ORDER

After consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus and the State’s 

answer and motion to dismiss, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On March 16, 2015, the petitioner, Christopher King, pleaded guilty to 

second-degree burglary in Criminal ID No. 1408020918 and second-degree rape in 

Criminal ID No. 1408022997 in exchange for the dismissal of other charges.1 The 

Superior Court immediately sentenced King as follows: (i) for second-degree rape, 

effective August 22, 2014, twenty-five years of Level V incarceration, suspended 

after seventeen years for decreasing levels of supervision; and (ii) for second-degree 

burglary, seven years of Level V incarceration. King did not appeal his convictions 

or sentence. 

 

1

 The Court has taken judicial notice of these cases. 
2

(2) On August 17, 2020, King filed this petition for a writ of mandamus 

directing the Superior Court to give him 197 days of credit for time he spent in jail 

between his arrest on August 29, 2014 and his sentencing on March 16, 2015. A 

writ of mandamus will only issue if the petitioner can show: (i) a clear right to the 

performance of a duty; (ii) that no other adequate remedy is available; and (iii) the 

trial court has arbitrarily failed or refused to perform its duty.2 “[I]n the absence of 

a clear showing of an arbitrary refusal or failure to act, this Court will not issue a 

writ of mandamus to compel a trial court to perform a particular judicial function, to 

decide a matter in a particular way, or to dictate the control of its docket.”3 

(3) King has not shown that the Superior Court arbitrarily failed or refused 

to perform a duty owed to him. “[A] defendant must be credited with all Level V 

time served in default of bail either by ‘backdating’ the effective date to the date of 

incarceration or by crediting the defendant with the time served.”4 The Superior 

Court sentenced King effective August 22, 2014, a week before his August 29, 2014 

arrest date. Not only did King receive credit for the time he was incarcerated before 

he pleaded guilty and was sentenced, he appears to have received an additional 

seven-days of credit toward his Level V sentence. 

 

2

In re Bordley, 545 A.2d 619, 620 (Del. 1988). 

3

Id.

4 McNair v. State, 2011 WL 768639, at *1 (Del. Mar. 4, 2011). See also 11 Del. C. § 3901(b), (c). 
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED. The petition for a writ of mandamus is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             952,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,516,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,810,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,977,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,869,000
<PP&E>                                          64,202,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,013,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,578,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,355,000
<BONDS>                                         42,188,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        11,276,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,927,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,578,000
<SALES>                                        192,817,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,817,000
<CGS>                                          127,313,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,183,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (892,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,403,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,123,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,770,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,353,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,353,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.06
        

</TABLE>