alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, T. Heath Fountain, certify that:1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heritage Financial Group; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The filer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, toensure that material informationrelating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made know to us byothers within those entities,particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of thefiler’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any changein the filer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurredduring the filer’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the filer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5) The filer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the filer’sauditors and the Audit Committee of filer’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affectthe filer’s ability to record,process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant rolein the filer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:      March 31, 2008 By:  /s/ T. Heath Fountain    T. Heath Fountain    Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(*Principal Financial and Accounting Officer*)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Contract Audit Agency 

# AGENCY:

Defense Contract Audit Agency 

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete a Record System 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Contract Audit Agency is deleteing a system of records notice in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

The actions will be effective on October 27, 2000 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to Defense Contract Audit Agency, Information and Privacy Advisor, CMR, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2135, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6219. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Dave Henshall at (703) 767-1005. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Defense Contract Audit Agency notices for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The proposed action is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which would require the submission of a new or altered system report for each system. 

## RDCAA 160.5 

### System name: 

                        Travel Orders                         *(August 3, 2000, 65 FR 48221).*

Reason: These records are now being maintained under the government-wide Privacy Act system of records notice GSA/Govt-4, Contracted Travel Services Program. 

Dated: September 20, 2000. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 00-24714 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-F
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 20, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00194-CV
HME EXECUTIVE COACH, INC. AND SH AHZAD AZIZ CHAU DHRY, Appellants V. SAMROD CORPORATION D/B/A BI G D TRAVEL CENTER, Appellee
On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-12150



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants
request the appeal be dismissed because the “parti es desire to complete the terms of a mediated
settlement agreement.” Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

150194F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

HME EXECUTIVE COACH, INC. AND SHAHZAD AZIZ CHAUDHRY, Appellants

No. 05-15-00194-CV V.

SAMROD CORPORATION D/B/A BIG D TRAVEL CENTER, Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-12150. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Fillmore and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee SAMROD CORPORATION D/B/A BIG D TRAV EL CENTER recover its cost s of this appeal from appellants HME EXECUTIVE COACH, INC. and SHAHZAD AZIZ CHAUDHRY.

Judgment entered February 20, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 463 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 463

    To apply the Freedom of Information Act to the Federal National 
  Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
    during any period that such entities are in conservatorship or 
                             receivership.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

  Mr. Chaffetz (for himself, Mr. Issa, Mr. Flake, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Platts, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, 
   Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Mack, and Mr. Quigley) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To apply the Freedom of Information Act to the Federal National 
  Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
    during any period that such entities are in conservatorship or 
                             receivership.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
Transparency Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF FOIA DURING CONSERVATORSHIP OR RECEIVERSHIP.

    (a) Fannie Mae.--Section 309 of the Federal National Mortgage 
Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1723a) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(p) Applicability of FOIA.--Notwithstanding section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, during any period that the corporation is under 
conservatorship or receivership pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal 
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
U.S.C. 4617), the corporation shall be considered to be an agency for 
purposes of section 552 of such title.''.
    (b) Freddie Mac.--Section 307 of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1456) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(h) Applicability of FOIA.--Notwithstanding section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, during any period that the Corporation is under 
conservatorship or receivership pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal 
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
U.S.C. 4617), the Corporation shall be considered to be an agency for 
purposes of section 552 of such title.''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

| Date: October 11, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Yongbo Wang                                          |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | Yongbo Wang                                              |   |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                        |   |                                                     |
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”)by Sonesta International Hotels Corporation (the “Company”), we, Peter J.Sonnabend, Stephanie Sonnabend and Boy A. J. van Riel, in our respectivepositions of CEO & Vice Chairman, CEO & President andTreasurer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that, to the best ofour knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Boston,  May 12, 2005 |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |   |
|   | /S/                        | Peter J.  Sonnabend |   |
|   | Name:                      | Peter J.  Sonnabend |
|   | Title:                     | Chief  Executive Officer and Vice Chairman |
|   |                       |   |
|   |                       |   |
|   | /S/                        | Stephanie  Sonnabend |   |
|   | Name:                      | Stephanie  Sonnabend |
|   | Title:                     | Chief Executive  Officer and President |
|   |                       |   |
|   |                       |   |
|   | /S/                        | Boy van Riel |   |
|   | Name:                      | Boy A. J.  van Riel |
|   | Title:                     | Vice  President and Treasurer |
|        |                            |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
#### Charles A. WOODS v. STATE.

No. 23890.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

Appellant has filed a motion, duly verified, in which he asks this court to dismiss his appeal in order that he may immediately begin to serve his sentence.

The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
----

----

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |

| Dated:  September 23, 2009                                                |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/ Yijun Wang                                                                |   |   |   |
| Yijun WangChief Executive Officer, President, Director(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                   
|No chart available.                                                   
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|New York Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-513-001]

                    Take notice that on September 8, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised                           ( print page 57597)                        Volume No. 1, Substitute Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 10, to be effective October 1, 2000.                

CIG states that on August 31, 2000, CIG made its annual filing adjusting its Gas Quality Control Surcharge(s). It has come to CIG's attention that the tariff sheets included herein contained a typographical error. Therefore, CIG is herein submitting substitute tariff sheets which correct such error.

CIG further states that copies of this filing have been served on CIG's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 Firrst Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24518 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### GROSS v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 20, 1951.

W. H. Lewis, Hyden, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., H. D. Reed, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Howard Gross was indicted on a charge of murdering Levi Muncy. He is appealing from a conviction of voluntary manslaughter, for which he received a 10 year sentence. The sole ground urged for reversal is that the verdict was palpably against the evidence and that the appellant was entitled to a peremptory instruction to find him not guilty on the grounds of self defense and apparent necessity. There is no question but that the appellant killed Levi Muncy by shooting him in the head at close range with a shotgun. The only issue is whether the appellant was acting in defense of himself and his wife at the time.

The shooting occurred on the evening of November 5, 1949. A number of people had gathered at the home of Shelby HalL Among those present was the deceased, who, with others, was engaged in drinking, dancing and playing a juke box. Gross and his wife appeared on the scene, according to his story, on the invitation of one of the Hall girls, who said she was afraid because some of those present were drunk. Sometime thereafter, Muncy and Gross got into a fight, as a result of which Gross received severe cuts on his head and chest. It is at this point that the proof becomes conflicting.

According to the Commonwealth’s evidence, Gross went out to the home of George Hall nearby and then to his own home, where he got a shotgun. He returned to the Hall home and shot Levi Muncy in the head some five or ten minutes after the original fight.

According to Gross’ proof, Muncy attacked him with a knife. He was carrying his shotgun when he arrived at Hall’s home and set it outside the front door. Muncy was drinking and violent and attacked him. He backed up out the front door, grabbed his shotgun and shot Muncy just as Muncy was turning on his wife.

The evidence was conflicting as to whether Gross shot in defense of himself and his wife, or killed Muncy after leaving the Hall place and getting his shotgun for the purpose of killing Muncy. The Commonwealth’s position is supported by the testimony of Sheldon Shepherd, Fred Asher, Joe Henry Napier and others. The members of the jury are the judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony. Swafford v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 178, 216 S.W.2d 919.

Judgment affirmed.
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 25367.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rape, and his punishment was assessed by the jury at two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception and no statement of facts; and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4592 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4592

  To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetic acid, sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetic acid, sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLOROACETIC ACID, SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.34 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Chloroacetic acid, sodium 
salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```