alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                        
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### TEXAS & N. O. R. CO. v. SOLGAARD.

No. A-3086.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 4, 1951.

Baker, Botts, Andrews & Parish, Houston, and Armstrong, Barker, Bedford & Lambdin, Galveston, for petitioner.

Markwell & Stubbs, Galveston, and Critz, Kuykendall, Bauknight & Stevenson, Austin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In our former opinion, Tex.Sup., 229 S. W.2d *777,*we remanded this cause tó the ■Court of Civil Appeals for it to pass on certain assignments of error made by the petitioner herein — appellant in that court— and which were not passed upon in its original opinion.

In its opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court, 236 S.W.2d 673, the Court of Civil Appeals stated we had decided that the trial court was not in error in overruling the petitioner’s motion for an instructed verdict. This we did not do, as is specifically stated in our opinion. However, we have carefully studied the present application for writ of error and we have concluded that there is evidence in the record to sustain the action of the trial court. Neither can we say, as a matter of law, that the respondent herein was .injured as a proximate result of his own negligence; nor that the acts of negligence of which the jury convicted the petitioner were not the proximate cause of respondent’s injuries.

The application for writ of error is therefore refused, no reversible error.
Exhibit
      23.1





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders of


Cleveland
      BioLabs, Inc.:





We
      consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB of Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. (the “Company”)
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the incorporation by reference
      in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-140687) of the Company of
      our
      report dated March 5, 2007, with respect to the balance sheets of Cleveland
      BioLabs, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements
      of
      operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
      three-year period ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December
      31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company.





/s/
      Meaden & Moore, Ltd.





Cleveland,
      Ohio


March
      29,
      2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6803

LARRY HENDRIX, Petitioner - Appellant, versusMARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-170-AW) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Hendrix, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hendrix v. Maryland Corr. Training Ctr. , No. CA-98-170-AW (D. Md. May 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§**Ernst
      & Young
      LLP**          § Phone
      (216)
      861-5000


1300
      Huntington Building      
www.ey.com


925 Euclid Avenue


Cleveland, Ohio
      44115-1405







**Report
      on Management's Assertion on**


**Compliance
      with the Specified Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in
      the**




**Report
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors and Shareholder


KeyCorp
      Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.




We
      have
      examined management's assertion, included in tlae accompanying report titled *Report* *of
      Management,* that
      KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc. (the "Company") complied
      with the
      servicing standards identified in Exhibit A (the "specified minimum servicing
      standards") to the *Report
      of Management* during
      the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible
      for the Company's compliance with these specified minimum servicing standards. Our
      responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
      Company's compliance
      based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
      Institute of
      Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
      basis, evidence about
      the
      Bank's compliance with the specified minimum servicing standards and performing such
      other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
      that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a legal
      determination on the Company's compliance with the specified minimum servicing standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned specified
      minimum servicing standards during the year ended December 31, 2005, is fairly stated,
      in all material respects.




/s/
      Ernst &
Young LLP




Kansas
      City, Missouri


January
      20, 2006






A
      Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4864 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4864

     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,2-Propanediol, 3-
   (diethylamino)-, polymers with 5-isocyanato-1- (isocyanatomethyl)-
 1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane, propylene glycol and reduced Me esters of 
    reduced polymd. oxidized tetrafluoroethylene, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol-
                       blocked, acetates (salts).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,2-Propanediol, 3-
   (diethylamino)-, polymers with 5-isocyanato-1- (isocyanatomethyl)-
 1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane, propylene glycol and reduced Me esters of 
    reduced polymd. oxidized tetrafluoroethylene, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol-
                       blocked, acetates (salts).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2-PROPANEDIOL, 3-(DIETHYLAMINO)-, POLYMERS WITH 5-
              ISOCYANATO-1- (ISOCYANATOMETHYL)-1,3,3-
              TRIMETHYLCYCLOHEXANE, PROPYLENE GLYCOL AND REDUCED ME 
              ESTERS OF REDUCED POLYMD. OXIDIZED TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE, 
              2-ETHYL-1-HEXANOL-BLOCKED, ACETATES (SALTS).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,2-Propanediol, 3- Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (diethylamino)-,                                                  12/31/2015
                          polymers with 5-
                          isocyanato-1-
                          (isocyanatomethyl
                          )-1,3,3-
                          trimethylcyclohex
                          ane, propylene
                          glycol and
                          reduced Me esters
                          of reduced
                          polymd. oxidized
                          tetrafluoroethyle
                          ne, 2-ethyl-1-
                          hexanol-blocked,
                          acetates (salts)
                          (CAS No. 328389-
                          90-8) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          3907.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, October 26, 2000. The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take place at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, DC, in Dining Room E of the Martin Building (Terrace level). The meeting will begin at 8:45 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 1:00 p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, Northwest, between 20th and 21st Streets. 

The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of the Board's responsibilities under the Consumer Credit Protection Act and on other matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time permitting, the Council will discuss the following topics: 

*Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act CRA Sunshine Regulation*                    —Discussion of issues regarding the proposal for disclosure of CRA agreements between financial institutions and community groups.                 

*Predatory Lending*                    —Discussion of issues resulting from the recent hearings on the Home Ownership Equity Protection Act.                 

*Home Mortgage Disclosure Act*                    —Discussion of the possible revisions to Regulation C which implements the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.                 

*Committee Reports*                    —Council committees will report on their work.                 

Other matters previously considered by the Council or initiated by Council members also may be discussed. 

Persons wishing to submit views to the Council regarding any of the above topics may do so by sending written statements to Ann Bistay, Secretary of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained from Ms. Bistay, 202-452-6470. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact Diane Jenkins, 202-452-3544. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 22, 2000. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-24888 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.02

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of SCANA Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
|   |         (1) | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |         (2) | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Date: May 6, 2010                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/Jimmy E. Addison                                |   |
| Jimmy E. Addison                                   |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

59

----
#### PALLAGE v. STATE.

No. 26095.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

*Dec. 3, 1952.*

John Cutler, Houston, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for giving a draft without sufficient funds as that offense is defined in Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

Section 1 of said Article 567b, V.A.P.C. reads as follows:.

> “It shall be unlawful for any person to procure any article or thing of value, or to secure possession of any personal property to which a lien has attached, or to make payment of any pre-exist-ing debt or other obligation of whatso*48ever form or nature, or for any other purpose to make or draw or utter or deliver, with intent to defraud, any check, draft or order, for the payment of money, upon any bank, person, firm or corporation, knowing at the time of such making, drawing, uttering or delivering, that the maker, or drawer, has not sufficient funds in, or on deposit with, such bank, person, firm or corporation, for the payment of such check, draft or order, in full, and all other checks, drafts or orders upon such funds then outstanding.”

It may be seen that an essential element of the offense charged is that of knowledge of the drawer or maker that he did not have sufficient funds on deposit with the drawee for the payment of the draft.

No such allegation is found in the instant complaint or information. Our able state’s attorney confesses that in the absence of such averment, no offense is charged.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4918 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4918

         To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium thiocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium thiocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM THIOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        NaSCN (Sodium       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Thiocyanate) (CAS                                                 12/31/2015
                          No. 540-72-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2842.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1 - Certifications




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


I, Mark
Hague,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form
10-KSB /A of Georgia International Mining Corporation for the period
ending December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 
13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information  contained in this report on Form 10-KSB /A fairly
presents in all material respects the  financial  condition 
and results of operations of  Georgia International Mining
Corporation.  September 10 , 2008/s/
Mark
HagueMark Hague, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officerand
Chief Accounting Officer, Georgia International Mining Corp.
Setting Standards for Excellence

National Electrical Manufacturers Association

_______________________ _______ 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 900 Rosslyn, VA 22209 (703) 841- 3200 March 24, 2014

Mr. Lucas Adin U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121

Dear Mr. Adin,

Subject: Data Analysis for ASRAC Pump Working Group (PWG) and DOE Rulemaking for Commercial & Industrial Pumps; EERE -2011

- BT

- STD -0031 and/or RIN 1904-AC54

As reported to you by Mr. Asdal, Executive Director of the Hydraulic Institute, in a letter dated March 2, 2014, HI commissioned NEMA BIS to do a survey of the pumps currently listed in the yellow and green regions of PowerPoint slide number 5 from the presentation that you emailed to us on 2/5/14 entitled “ASRAC Pump Meeting Slides FINAL 2014-01 -31 with Edits v2.pptx.”

As reported, the survey was designed to be very similar to the most recent survey sent out by LBNL and Navigant, with modifications noted on March 2, 2014. NEMA BIS and HI have actively pursued the participation of as many pump OEMs as possible in ensuring that we capture the best pump industry data available. Where we needed to do so, the data has been load factored to expand the aggregate participant data to capture an estimate of the entire industry.

HI’s survey was conducted by NEMA BIS, under contract and confidentiality rules established by the

HI Board of Directors.

We are pleased to provide the results as aggregated data for release, through your offices, to the DOE consultants (Navigant, LBNL, etc.) and the ASRAC Pump Working Group for their upcoming meeting

later this week.

Respectfully,

Stacey Harrison Director, Statistical Operations

NEMA/Business Information Services 1300 17th Street North, Suite 900 Rosslyn, VA 22209 (703) 841-3269 harrisons@nema.org

cc: Robert K. Asdal, Executive Director, Hydraulic Institute Mary Silver, Director, Member Services & IT, Hydraulic Institute