SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)SIP Submitted by: Maryland Department of the EnvironmentDate Submitted: October 8, 2014Subject: Amendments to the Control of gasoline and Volatile Organic Compound Storage and HandlingCompleteness ReviewCompleted by: Asrah KhadrDate Completed: 11/18/14Administrative MaterialsACCEPTABLEEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or hisdesignee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revisionthereof.1. Letter dated October 8, 2014,from Robert M. Summers,Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment to ShawnM. Garvin, Regional Administrator.X2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State codeor body of regulations; or issuedthe permit, order, consentagreement in final form. That evidence shall include the dateof adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of theplan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.2. Letter dated July 22, 2013 from Robert M. Summers,Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment to ShawnM. Garvin, Regional Administrator stating that the MarylandState Implementation Plan (SIP) was revised.X3. Evidence that the State hasthe necessary legal authorityunder State law to adopt and implement the plan.3. Robert M. Summers, Secretary, Maryland Department of theEnvironment has delegated authority to adopt and implementthe Maryland SIP revision.X4. A copy of actual regulation,or document submitted forapproval and incorporation by reference into the plan, includingindication of the changes madeto the existing approved plan,where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the officialState regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by theappropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceableby the State. The effective date of the regulation/documentshall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.4.A copy of the amended regulation published in the Maryland Register, volume 41, Issue 14 on July 11, 2014, isprovided in the submittal.XEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)5. Evidence that the State followed all of the proceduralrequirements of the State's lawsand constitution in conductingand completing the adoption/issuance of the plan.5. Certification by Robert M. Summers, Secretary, that alladministrative procedures were followed in letter dated October8, 2014, from Robert M. Summers, Secretary, MarylandDepartment of the Environment to Shawn M. Garvin, RegionalAdministrator.X6. Evidence that public noticewas given of the proposedchange consistent with procedures approved by EPA, includingthe date of publication of such notice.6. Certification from MDE webmaster Diana Alegre that thenotice was posted on MDE’s website from April 17, 2014 toJune 4, 2014. A copy of the public notice as it appeared onMDE’s website is provided.X7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordancewith the information providedin the public notice and theState's laws and constitution, if applicable.7. No public hearing was requested.X8. Compilation of public comments and the State's responsethereto.8. N/AN/ATechnical MaterialsEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)1. Identification of all regulatedpollutants affected by the plan.1. Ozone.X2. Identification of the locations of affected sources includingthe EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locationsand the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s).2. The State of Maryland.X3. Quantification of the changesin plan allowable emissionsfrom the affected sources; estimates of changes in currentactual emissions from affectedsources or, where appropriate,quantification of changes in actual emissions from affectedsources through calculations of the differences between certainbaseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a resultof the revision.3. The SIP revision will provide emissions benefits. Thisinformation is included in the technical support document inthe submittal.X4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient airquality standards, preventionof significantdeteriorationincrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, andvisibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approvedand implemented.4. The SIP revision will provideemissions benefits, thereforeair quality is protected by the SIP revision.X5. Modeling information required to support the proposedrevision, including input data,output data, models used,ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,justification for use of offsitedata (where used), modes ofmodels used, assumptions, and other information relevant tothe determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.5. Not applicable.N/A6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations arebased on continuous emission reduction technology.6. Not applicable.N/A7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, workpractice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,where necessary, to ensure emission levels.7. Not applicable.N/A8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including howcompliance will be determined in practice.8. Not applicable.N/AEPA REQUIREMENTSTATE SUBMITTAL(X)9. Special economic and technological justifications requiredby any applicable EPA policies.(If a policy is not appropriate,explain why.)9. Not applicable.N/A10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by amaintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevantNAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.10. Not applicable because thisis not a section 107 request.N/A