alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
J. Semanick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                            /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Ronald J. Semanick
                            Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                             and Treasurer
                            November 13, 2008
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00118-CV 

SHERRY RUNNELS, Appellant 

V. 

US BANK & TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE 

OF AMERICAN HOMEOWNER PRESERVATION TRUST 

SERIES 2013C, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00051-A 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant’s brief was due May 6, 2015. By letter dated May 7, 2015, the Court notified 

appellant that her brief was overdue. We directed appellant to file, within ten days, a brief and 

an extension motion. We further warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the 

appeal. To date, appellant has neither filed a brief nor communicated with the Court regarding 

the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). 

150118F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SHERRY RUNNELS, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00118-CV V. 

US BANK & TRUST NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF 

AMERICAN HOMEOWNER 

PRESERVATION TRUST SERIES 2013C, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00051-A. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We 

ORDER that appellee US Bank & Trust National Association, as Trustee of American 

Homeowner Preservation Trust Series 2013C, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant 

Sherry Runnels. 

Judgment entered July 30, 2015.
#### PIERCE v. STATE.

No. 24867.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1950.

Alvin R. Allison, Earl R. Allison, Level-land, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area under complaint and information alleging, for the purpose of enhancing the punishment, a prior conviction for that offense. The jury assessed the punishment at a fine of $1125.00.

The evidence of the State is sufficient 'to sustain the jury’s findings, and appellant offered no evidence or defense.

There are eight bills of exception which have been considered, the first seven of which relate to the court’s rulings on evidence offered, and present no reversible error.

Appellant’s brief is devoted to his Bill of Exception No. 8, which complains of the following rebuttal argument of the county attorney: “This case is going to you in just a few minutes and you will determine whether or not the defendant is guilty and, should you find him guilty of this offense, and if you should find that there is a prior conviction in this case, then you can assess a penalty, as the court has instructed you, of double the amount up to two (2) years in jail and a $2,000.00 fine. Gentlemen of the Jury, I leave it to you what this penalty should be, but remember, Gentlemen of the Jury, the people of Hockley County are entitled to have their liquor laws enforced, and I ask you at this time that we put that jail to the use over there for which it was intended.”

In his brief, appellant directs his attack against that part of the argument quoted wherein the county attorney said “the people of Hockley County are entitled to have their liquor laws enforced, and I ask you at this time that we put that jail to the use over there for which it was intended.”

It may be noted that appellant’s punishment was assessed 'by the jury at a fine, and not a jail sentence.

But it is not necessary for this court to pass upon whether any particular part of the argument complained of was improper.

The bill complains of the whole of the argument set out therein and above quoted. It is apparent that at least the first part of the argument is not objectionable.

Bill of Exception No. 8 fails to single out any part of such argument, but complains of it as a whole. A part of the argument complained of being proper, the bill is insufficient to reflect reversible error. See Lucas v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 277, 135 S.W.2d 720, 721; Moore v. State, 107 Tex.Cr.R. 287, 296 S.W. 308.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopsmith, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. May, Vice
President of Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

February 10, 2003                              By: /s/ Mark May
                                                      Vice President of Finance
                                                      And Treasurer

                                    Page 33
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4715 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4715

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on e-Caprolactone-2-ethyl-2-
                (hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol polymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Guthrie introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on e-Caprolactone-2-ethyl-2-
                (hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol polymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. E-CAPROLACTONE-2-ETHYL-2-(HYDROXYMETHYL)-1,3-PROPANEDIOL 
              POLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to e-Caprolactone-2-ethyl-2-
(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol polymer) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-099-1020-PG-003E]


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Lewistown Field Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Central Montana Resource Advisory Council will meet 
October 17-18, 2000 at the Holiday Inn, In Great Falls, Montana.
    The October 17 portion of the meeting will begin at 7:45 am with a 
field trip to the Greenfields Irrigation District. The council will 
then have lunch and return to the Holiday Inn. At 1 p.m. there will be 
a 30-minute public comment period; followed by a welcome and 
orientation session for new RAC members; field manager updates; a 
review of funding requests for fiscal year 2001 and CARA legislation; a 
review of Lewis & Clark Bicentennial plans; and an open discussion 
among council members. This session will adjourn at 5 p.m.
    The October 18 session will begin at 7:45 am with updates 
concerning sage grouse and sagebrush, prairie dogs, plovers, black-
footed ferrets, noxious weeds, cottonwood regeneration and a 
cooperative ecosystem river study. The council will break for lunch 
from 12-1 p.m. After lunch the RAC will participate in discussions 
concerning the Missouri River subgroup, subdivisions, cottonwood 
regeneration, and river ferry crossing funding projects. These updates 
will conclude by 3:30 pm. The council will then address administrative 
details and adjourn by 5 p.m.

DATES: October 17 and 18, 2000.

LOCATION: Holiday Inn, Great Falls, Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Mari, Lewistown Field 
Manager, Lewistown Field Office, Bureau of land Management, Box 1160, 
Airport Road, Lewistown, MT.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public and there 
will be a public comment period as described above 59457.

    Dated: September 21, 2000.
B. Gene Miller,
Associate Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-25108 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | -91    | -74   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 573    | 30     | -448   | 75     | -74    | 56     | -61    | -25    | 83     | -106  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 29     | -27    | 58     | -154   | 142    | -4     | 16     | 33     | -12    | 42    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 51     | 58     | -28    | -56    | 3      | 13     | 9      | -3     | 135   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -19    | -59    | 38     | 3      | 39     | 137    | -116   | 18     | 43     | 90    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -29    | 30     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 123   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 124    | 109    | 68     | 71     | 56     | 84     | 107    | 151    | 85     | 49    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 52     | 209    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to December 14, 2021 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 21

- 122 Budke v. Budke

A

- 21

- 429 In re Interest of M.W. et al.

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.
Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
#### In the Matter of Michael Kelly, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Superintendent of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Kane, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) to review a determination of respondents finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison temporary release rule.

In 1985 petitioner, then an inmate at Green Haven Correctional Facility in Dutchess County, was granted permission to participate in a temporary release program in order to receive outside treatment for a deteriorative heart condition. Petitioner agreed in writing to abide by certain conditions placed on temporary releases, including a prohibition on applying for or renewing a motor vehicle operator’s license without appropriate approval *(see,*7 NYCRR 1902.1 [11]). This proceeding stems from a finding that petitioner violated that condition.

We confirm. It is axiomatic that a determination of petitioner’s guilt will not be disturbed if it is supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see, e.g., Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135). The evidence relied on in this case included several documents demonstrating that during his temporary *611release, petitioner applied for a driver’s license, took two road tests with the Department of Motor Vehicles and was issued a probationary license dated July 8, 1985. Also relied on was a Department of Motor Vehicle form 501, petitioner’s "Road Test Evaluation”, which bears a signature quite similar to petitioner’s. In rebuttal, petitioner submitted proof at his hearing that he was blind and, therefore, was incapable of taking the road tests. Petitioner also offered a sworn statement from his sister that she believed it was petitioner’s brother who actually took the road tests. A review of the evidence submitted by petitioner indicates serious visual problems but does not conclusively demonstrate his inability to undertake the actions on which his guilt is predicated. Accordingly, the determination should be confirmed and the petition dismissed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                          
|California State Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                          
|California State Offshore Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 191 (Monday, October 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58826-58827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information and Intelligent 
System (1200).
    Date and Time: October 24, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1120, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ephraim Glinert, Deputy Division Director, 
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, Room 1115, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 292-8930.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Human and Computer Interaction 
Career proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.


[[Page 58827]]


    Dated: September 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-25189 Filed 9-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M