alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6      | 858    | 9,307 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 20,070 | 21,950 | 13,523 | 11,483 | 12,792 | 9,154  | 9,637  | 26,484 | 25,598 | 29,553
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 28,533 | 35,630 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, J. Stephen Vanderwoude, as Managing Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
----------------------------------------

Name:   J. Stephen Vanderwoude
Title:  Managing Director, Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 31, 2006




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### DANSBY v. STATE.

No. 23344.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1946.

Benjamin Kucera, of Lubbock, for appellant.

*267Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder with malice, and his punishment assessed at four years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 24003.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for theft from the person, with a sentence of two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception and appellant has filed no brief indicating the particular grounds upon which a reversal is sought. The only defense offered was that of an alibi, with the denial by appellant as a witness in her behalf that she is the person guilty of the offense charged. The prosecuting witness positively identified her as the woman to whom he had sold and delivered a watermelon. He says that he received the money and as he was placing it with a roll of *168money in his shirt pocket she grabbed it, tore the pocket loose, and ran with $147 but she lost $1 which he recovered. He gave chase but she escaped and was arrested the following day. The question of fact thus raised was decided by the jury contrary to her contention and their finding will not be disturbed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### McGREW v. STATE.

No. 27024.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 16, 1954.

C. C. McKinney, Cooper, Frank D. Wear, Paris, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, 25 years.

No statement of facts of the trial on its merits is before us. This appeal is predi*382cated on the alleged error of the trial court in failing to grant a new trial because the appellant learned after verdict that a juror who had served at his trial could not read or write.

The motion alleged that the juror was asked while being examined as a prospective juror if he could read or write and that he remained silent which indicated that he could do so. A hearing was had on the motion, and the statement of facts on such hearing is before us. Only three witnesses were heard. Echols, the district clerk, testified that the members of the venire were asked if they could read and write, and no one stated that he could not.

The juror Penny, whose qualifications are here questioned, testified that no such question was asked him.

The court reporter read into the record the voir dire examination of the prospective juror Penny, which reveals no question as to his literacy.

In San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Gray, Tex.Civ.App., 66 S.W. 229, it was held that it was incumbent upon the complaining party to show that he questioned the juror as to his literacy.

The trial court therefore had before him a conflict in the testimony as to whether such a question was ever asked. He resolved this conflict against the appellant, and no abuse of discretion is shown.

Recently in Renfro v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 400, 242 S.W.2d 772, we held the qualification as to the juror’s literacy was one that could be waived.

In De Arman v. State, 80 Tex.Cr.R. 147, 189 S.W. 145, we held it incumbent upon the accused to show that a sufficient number of jurors resided in the county in question who could read and write from whom a jury might be selected. No such showing is made in the record before us.

The Legislature has not seen fit to amend the statute, and we aré not inclined to overrule the holding in the De Arman case.

- Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0726 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-023-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2014 - 0249 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM211AD

40 - 56 - 03 --- 4/30/12 45 - 56 - 3 --- 4/30/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4773 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4773

            To extend the suspension of duty on Bifenazate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Ross of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the suspension of duty on Bifenazate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIFENAZATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bifenazate) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<Page>

Exhibit  4.1
SPECIMIN STOCK CERTIFICATE

             ------------------------------------------------------
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
             ------------------------------------------------------

------                                                           --------------
  No.                                                                 Shares
------                                                           --------------
                               The State of Nevada

[LOGO]
                              Pacific Spirit, Inc.
        One Hundred Million Common Shares Authorized, $0.001 Par Value

This Certifies That SPECIMEN is the owner of ______________________ Common
Shares $0.001 par value each of the Capital Stock of

                              Pacific Spirit, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers, and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation this ______ day of _____________ At

[SEAL]


-------------------------                               -----------------------
       President                                               Secretary

                                                -------- ---------
                                                SHARES $0.001 EACH
                                                -------- ---------


                                                    CERTIFICATE
                                                        FOR

                                                      SHARES

                                                [SEAL APPEARS HERE]

                                                      OF THE

                                                   CAPITAL STOCK


                                               PACIFIC SPIRIT, INC.

                                                     ISSUED TO


                                      DATED



         For Value Received ______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ______
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the written Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint __________________________________________ to
transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.

Dated _________________________

In presence of _______________________

NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN

ON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION AND
ENLARGEMENTS OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 4      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 5      | 2      | 2      | 4      | 7     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4586 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial staple fibers of viscose rayon, 

not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial staple fibers 

of viscose rayon, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE 

4 RAYON, NOT CARDED, COMBED OR OTHER5 WISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4586 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Artificial staple fibers of 

viscose rayon, not carded, 

combed or otherwise processed for spinning, measuring greater than 1.3 

decitex to 1.66 decitex and 

having a fiber length each 

measuring 20 mm or more 

but not over 150 mm (provided for in subheading 

5504.10.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America v. C. E. FOSTER.

No. 1565.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1937.

Chester A. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl.

Richard L. Wheatley, of Vinita, Okl., for appellee.

Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
M. Clancy, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                  /s/ William M. Clancy
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  William M. Clancy
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer
                                                  August 13, 2002
Exhibit 13.1


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with this Annual Report of Diana Shipping Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Simeon Palios, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 Date: April 20, 2012
 
 /s/ Simeon Palios
 Simeon Palios
 Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)