alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 6, 2013

h0130 

# Order

February 6, 2013

146024

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146024

COA: 301253

Iosco CC: 09

- 004926

- FC

JIMMIE ALLEN NELSON,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the defendant’s

remaining issues. Even absent concrete proo f of a particular act causing death, the

circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient, when viewed in the light most favorable to

the prosecution, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant caused the

victim’s death with malice. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we

are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this

Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4808 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4808

 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain programmable slow 
                                cookers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain programmable slow 
                                cookers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROGRAMMABLE SLOW COOKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Programmable Slow   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Cooker with                                                       12/31/2015
                          thermometer
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8516.79.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 27     | 12     | 9      | 13    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 9      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 7C Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 7C Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 55    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 69     | 77     | 66     | 162    | 363    | 138    | 215    | 128    | 172    | 100   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 110    | 126    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARCELINO CEJA-ROMERO, a.k.a.

Marcelino Cejas-Romero, a.k.a. Juan

Lemos Covarruvias, a.k.a. Marcelino

Perales-Flores,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10484

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01134-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Marcelino Ceja-Romero appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-

month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

FILED

DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10484

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ceja-Romero’s counsel has

filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ceja-Romero with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

LEONARD TAYLOR,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

LAKESIDE RECOVERY SOLUTION 

INC.,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

MO:20-CV-00024-DC

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

Court records indicate that Defendant Lakeside Recovery Solution Inc. (Defendant) has 

failed to file a timely answer or motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. On 

February 12, 2020, the Clerk of the Court issued summons as to Defendant, which states: 

Within 21 days after service of this summons . . . you must serve 

on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion 

under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. . . . If you 

fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for 

the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your 

answer or motion with the court. 

(Doc. 7). 

On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff Leonard Taylor returned the executed summons. 

(Doc. 8). Plaintiff served Defendant by delivering a true copy of the Summons and a copy of the 

Complaint to Linda Smith, Corporation Service Company, who is designated by law to accept 

service of process on behalf of Lakeside Recovery Solutions, Inc. on February 14, 2020. Id. 

Consequently, Defendant’s responsive pleading was due on or before Friday, March 6, 2020. See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant SHOW CAUSE in writing within ten (10) 

days after being served with this Order, why Entry of Default and Default Judgment on 

Case 7:20-cv-00024-DC Document 10 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on January 28, 2020, in the above-styled and numbered cause should 

not be granted. Defendant may comply with this Order by filing an Answer that adheres to the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within ten (10) days after being served with this Order. 

Failure to comply with this Order may result in the Entry of Default and Default Judgment 

against Defendant. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a certified copy of this 

Order by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested to the address on record. 

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 23rd day of June, 2020.

DAVID COUNTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00024-DC Document 10 Filed 06/23/20 Page 2 of 2
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 13     | -26    | 7      | -9     | 7      | 2      | 3      | 5      | 9     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 45     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Texas (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Texas (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 59     | 614    | 533    | 2,446  | 730    | 2,535  | 3,833  | 7,418 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10,048 | 12,325 | 19,132 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 24370.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault and fined the sum of $100 and he appeals.

The record before us does not contain a copy of a final judgment, the presence of which is necessary before our jurisdiction attaches. See Hellman v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 460, 222 S.W. 980; Ellis v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 339, 145 S.W.2d 176.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 24, 2017





By:/s/ Emanuel ChiricoName:Emanuel ChiricoChairman and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RY. CO. OF TEXAS v. APPLEBY.

No. 3197.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

May 6, 1954.

Ñaman, Howell & Boswell, Waco, Jack Cureton, Meridian, for appellant.

Scarborough, Yates, Scarborough & Black, Abilene, for appellee.

McDOÑALD,' Chief Justice.

This is a suit for damages 'brought by the appellee against the appellant for injuries sustained while working for appellant. Appellee contended that appellant was liable as a result of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act', 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.

Trial was 'to a jury, which - awarded ap-pellee a verdict. Judgment was entered on the verdict and appellant appealed to this court, where same is pending for disposition.

It has come to the attention of the court that there has been a full compromise and settlement of the-matters. in controversy herein, and therefore nothing remains for this court to adjudicate. '■

It r is therefore ordered that this appeal be and same is hereby dismissed.
| Subsidiary                                   | Country      of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Ailuk      Shipping Company Inc.             | Marshall      Islands         |
| Bikini      Shipping      Company Inc.       | Marshall      Islands         |
| Gala Properties      Inc.                    | Marshall      Islands         |
| Jaluit      Shipping Company Inc.            | Marshall      Islands         |
| Kili      Shipping Company Inc.              | Marshall      Islands         |
| Knox      Shipping Company Inc.              | Marshall      Islands         |
| Lib      Shipping Company Inc.               | Marshall      Islands         |
| Majuro      Shipping Company Inc.            | Marshall      Islands         |
| Taka      Shipping Company Inc.              | Marshall      Islands         |
| Husky      Trading, S.A.                     | Panama                        |
| Buenos      Aires Compania Armadora S.A.     | Panama                        |
| Cerada      International S.A.               | Panama                        |
| Changame      Compania Armadora S.A.         | Panama                        |
| Chorrera      Compania Armadora S.A.         | Panama                        |
| Cypres      Enterprises Corp.                | Panama                        |
| Darien      Compania Armadora S.A.           | Panama                        |
| Diana      Shipping Services S.A.            | Panama                        |
| Eaton      Marine S.A.                       | Panama                        |
| Panama      Compania Armadora S.A.           | Panama                        |
| Skyvan      Shipping Company S.A.            | Panama                        |
| Texford      Maritime S.A.                   | Panama                        |
| Urbina      Bay Trading, S.A.                | Panama                        |
| Vesta      Commercial, S.A.                  | Panama                        |
| Marfort      Navigation Company Limited      | Cyprus                        |
| Silver      Chandra Shipping Company Limited | Cyprus                        |
| Bulk      Carriers (USA) LLC                 | United      States (Delaware) |
November 20, 2014.



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JETALL COMPANIES, IN C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00833

- CV V.

FOUR SEASONS FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC. A ND DAVID G. DANG
, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from summary judgment orders in favor of appellee s , Four Seasons Food Distributors, Inc. and David G. Dang, signed September 12, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record a nd find no error in the orders. We order the summary judgment orders of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Jetall Compani es, Inc., to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We furthe r order this decision certified below for observance.