alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4677 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4677

     To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Flubendiamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Flubendiamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FLUBENDIAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Mixtures of N1-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          [1,1-Dimethyl-2-                                                  12/31/2015
                          mesylethyl-3-iodo-
                          N2-{2-methyl-4-
                          [1,2,2,2-
                          terafluoro-1-
                          (trifluoromethyl)
                          ethyl]phenyl}phth
                          alamide
                          (Flubendiamide)
                          (CAS No. 272451-
                          65-7) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          3808.91.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History:                                         
|                                                      
|No chart available.                                   
|No chart available.                                   
|                                                      
|                                                      
|Kentucky Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 7B Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 7B Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 10    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 11     | 11     | 11     | 12     | 11     | 9      | 10     | 10     | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Alabama (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Alabama (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 9      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PR Specialists, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Ruden, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 28, 2009



/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden, President

PR Specialists, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 4, 2020

b0127

Order 

Clerk

February 4, 2020

159428

In re Conservatorship of MARILYN BURHOP. _________________________________________

ROBERT SIRCHIA and ANNE SIRCHIA,

Petitioners,

and

CONSTANCE L. JONES, Conservator of

MARILYN BURHOP, a legally protected

person,

Appellee,

v SC: 159428

COA: 340771 

Washtenaw PC: 14-000326-CA

ROBERT SIRCHIA, Trustee of the MARILYN

BURHOP REVOCABLE TRUST,

Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### GODWIN v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS INS. ASS’N.

No. A-922.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 12, 1946.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1946.

White & Yarborough and W. E. Johnson, all of Dallas, for petitioner.

Robertson, Leachman, Payne, Gardere & Lancaster and Fred T. Porter, all of Dallas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM

This case is before this court on application for writ of error filed on behalf of W. R. Godwin: It is a suit for compensation on account of a wound sustained originally to Godwin’s third or distal phal-ange of the second finger of his right hand. In the trial court compensation was sought and awarded for the loss of the use of other members resulting from, and growing out of the original wound to his finger. There was no issue submitted to the jury and, therefore, no finding that the original injury extended to and affected other portions of the body or that such injury was not confined solely to the finger. By obj ections to the charge and requests for special issues, as reflected in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, respondent preserved the question for review on appeal. There was some evidence that such injury did spread to other members.

 The Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that, for the error above indicated, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed, but it fell into error in rendering judgment that petitioner taire nothing except compensation for the loss of the use of the particular phalange which sustained the wound. The case should have been remanded generally to the trial court. The order of the court rendering *348the case rather than remanding same is in conflict with Consolidated Underwriters v. Langley, 141 Tex. 78, 170 S.W.2d 463.

By Art. 1728, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. and Texas Rule 483 this court is authorized to reverse and remand a case on the application for writ of error without the necessity of granting the writ and hearing the case when the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with a previous opinion of this court. That.authority has heretofore been exercised. Casstevens v. Texas & P. R. Co., 119 Tex. 456, 32 S.W.2d 637, 73 A.L.R. 89; Adams v. Bida, 125 Tex. 458, 84 S.W.2d 693; Simpson et al. v. Charity Benevolent Association, 137 Tex. 215, 152 S.W.2d 1093.

It appears that this is another proper case for its exercise and it is therefore ordered that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, in so far as it reformed the trial court’s judgment and rendered judgment against petitioner, be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4599 

To extend the suspension of duty on esters and sodium esters of 

parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on esters and sodium 

esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTERS AND SODIUM ESTERS OF 

4 PARAHYDROXYBENZOIC ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.75 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 esters and sodium esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4599 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4746 

To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-MERCAPTOETHANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.60 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Mercaptoethanol) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### EVERMAN v. EVERMAN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 26, 1951.

J. A. Edge, Lexington, for appellant.

Elwood Rosenbaum, Lexington, for ap-pellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In an action against her estranged husband, in which she sought an award of alimony but did not ask for a divorce, Ophelia Hudgins Everman was granted the sum of $200 as lump sum alimony. On this appeal she contends that the award was wholly inadequate.

The parties were married in February 1946 and remained together until July 1947, when the husband departed from the one-room rented apartment in which they were living. At the time of the marriage, Mrs. Everman was a 57-year-old widow, and Mr. Everman was a 67-year-old widower. It appears that prior to the marriage there was some misrepresentation by each party as to financial condition, Mrs. Everman having represented that a rooming house she was operating was a profitable venture,, and Mr. Everman having represented that he owned a couple of farms and a home in Clark County. As it turned out, the owner of the rooming house dispossessed Mrs. Everman a few months after the marriage, and Mr. Everman’s real estate ownership proved to be nothing more than a life estate in some property which his first wife had owned, and which, under the terms of his first wife’s will, he had forfeited by marrying again.

The only assets of the husband established by positive proof were bank accounts totalling $400. At the time of the separation, he was employed as a deputy sheriff at a salary of $125 per month, from which there occasionally were deductions for days he was unable to work.

Mrs. Everman appears to have no property. Prior to the marriage, she operated the rooming house and also was employed as chief salad maker, at a salary of $100 per month, in a hospital in Lexington. A few months after the marriage she resigned from her job at the hospital, and as previously mentioned, she was dispossessed from the rooming house.

It is clear that neither of the parties to this marriage contract received quite what he bargained for. We consider it unnecessary to detail the evidence as to the conduct of the parties during the brief period of the marriage, and the causes of difficulties between them, but from the evidence the chancellor could have concluded that the wife was in some degree at fault in causing the separation.

The only sources from which alimony could be paid by the husband were his $400 bank account and the earnings he, now 68-years of age, might make as a deputy sheriff or in other unskilled employment.

*59Upon the whole case, we can find no basis for disturbing the judgment of the ■chancellor.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0124

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD WAYNE SPARKS,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 8, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 30 2023

01/30/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0124
EPA Form 5900-83 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 04/30/2012

Federal Operating Permit Pr ogram (40 CFR Part 71)

INSIGNIFICANT EMISSIONS (IE)

On this page list each insignificant activity or emission unit. In the "number" column, indicate the number

of units in this category. Descriptions should be brief but unique. Indicate which emissions criterion of

part 71 is the basis for the exemption.

Number Description of Activities or Emissions Units RAP,

except

HAP HAPEPA Form 5900-83 2

INSTRUCTIONS FOR IE

INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Use this form only if you have any equipment, emissions units, or emitting activities at your facility that

qualify for insignificant treatment due to insignificant emissions levels (defined in the part 71 rule) and

you desire such treatment.

Generally identify the source of emissions.

The "number" column is provided to indicate the total number or units or activities grouped together

under one description, for example, equipment such as valves and flanges. However, units or

activities that are similar should be listed separately in the form when the descriptions differ in a

meaningful way, such as when capacities or sizes di ffer and this information is relevant, for example,

to an applicability determination.

Check one of the columns provided to indicate which emission level criteria of part 71 is met for these

units or activities that warrant such treatment. The rule provides 2 emission criteria:

 emissions of 2 tons per year or less or any regulated pollutants except HAP (RAP, except

HAP) from any emission unit, or

 1000 pounds per year or less of any HAP from any emission unit

.

Note that part 71 does not exempt any insignificant units from major source applicability

determinations.

In addition, attach to this form information concer ning equipment, activities, or emissions units that are

exempted from an otherwise applicable requirement (e.g., grandfathered emissions units. Please cite

the basis for the exemption (e.g., State administrative code or Federal regulation).
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust2005-A**

 

Aggregate Data for year ended December 31,2005

 
| Defaulted  Contracts                    |   | $      | 12,854,218.46  |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------|--------|
|                                    |   |   |           |
| Total Collections                       |   | $      | 306,118,564.92 |   |
|                                    |   |   |           |
| Regular Principal Distributable Amounts |   | $      | 263,094,879.54 |   |
|                                    |   |   |           |
| Interest Collected on Contracts         |   | $      | 50,527,866.06  |   |
|                                    |   |   |           |
| Annual Servicing Fee                    |   | $      | 5,233,897.48   |   |

 

----