Cite as 2017 Ark. 47

No. CV-16-907

KENNETH RAY PITTS

APPELLANT

V.

PATRICK S. DRUMMOND, APN,

WILLIAM BENTON, HEALTH SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATOR, ROY GRIFFINS, 

DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH AND 

CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM,

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTION 

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered February 16, 2017

PRO SE MOTIONS FOR COUNSEL 

AND TO PROCEED WITHOUT 

COSTS

[PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT 

COURT, NO. 60CV-50-6]

HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS 

FOX, JUDGE

REMANDED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL 

RECORD.

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Ray Pitts submitted to the circuit court a petition for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis so that he might initiate an action on a civil “complaint for money damages, 

preliminary injunction relief and jury trial demand.” The trial court entered an order 

denying the unfiled in forma pauperis petition under a miscellaneous case number used to 

docket documents not associated with a specific circuit court case number, and Pitts filed a 

notice of appeal of that order.1 A record on appeal was lodged in this court, and the 

certification by the clerk indicates that the documents in the record shown as attachments 

to the order are true copies of those submitted by Pitts and that no civil action was filed 

because the order denied the request to proceed as a pauper and no filing fee was received.

 

1 Pitts appears to have attached a second in forma pauperis petition to the notice of 

appeal, but no order on this second in forma pauperis petition appears in the record.

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
Cite as 2017 Ark. 47

2

Pitts has filed two motions, one for appointment of counsel and the other “to be 

allowed to proceed without costs in the circuit court.” In the motion to proceed without 

costs, Pitts would have this court declare him to be proceeding as a pauper on appeal and 

direct the circuit clerk to file the in forma pauperis petition that he submitted to the circuit 

court. Before we can address Pitts’s other requests, we must remand for return of a 

supplemental record.

This court determines whether a court has subject-matter jurisdiction based on the 

pleadings. Tripcony v. Ark. Sch. for the Deaf, 2012 Ark. 188, 403 S.W.3d 559. If jurisdiction 

is not established by the pleadings, the court is not to proceed further. McKinney v. City of 

El Dorado, 308 Ark. 284, 824 S.W.2d 826 (1992). Pitts’s petition for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis must be file marked. Dunahue v. Dennis, 2016 Ark. 285 (per curiam) 

(Dunahue I). We have previously directed the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk to adopt a 

policy that does not act to prevent appeals of adverse decisions regarding inmate civil-case 

filings in accord with our holding in Dunahue v. Raines, 2016 Ark. 426, ___ S.W.3d ___ 

(per curiam) (Dunahue II). Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court for the circuit clerk 

to correct and supplement the record with pleadings that have been marked in accord with 

that new policy. See Halfacre v. Kelley, 2016 Ark. 71 (per curiam). The supplemental record 

must be received here no later than fourteen days from the date of this order. Once the 

supplemental record with the corrected pleadings has been received, we will address the 

remaining issues that Pitts raises.

Remanded for supplemental record.