alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(see attached scope of accreditationfor field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)Print Date: 08/17/2009Page 1 of 2This is to signify thatNTA, INC.305 NORTH OAKLAND AVENUENAPPANEE, INDIANA 46550Product Certification Agency PCA-102Third-party Certification Bodyhas met the International Accreditation Service (IAS) Accreditation Criteria for Product Certification Agencies AC370 and hasdemonstrated compliance with ISO/IEC Guide 65 (1996),General requirements for bodies operating product certificationsystems.NTA, Inc. has been accredited, commencing July 1, 2009 to provide third-party product certification services listed inthe approved scope of accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President PresidentNTA, Inc. PCA-102Third-party Certification BodyJuly 1, 2009Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentPrint Date: 08/17/2009Page 2 of 2NTA, Inc.Eric Tompos305 North Oakland AvenueVice PresidentNappanee, IN 46550(574) 773-7975CATEGORIES of CERTIFICATIONManufactured Homes & Modular Factory BuiltConstructionAdhesivesFastenersGypsum WallboardStructural AssembliesPlumbing FixturesMetal Plate Connected TrussesStructural PlasticsLight Gauge and Cold Formed Steel ComponentsThermal & Moisture Barrier UnderlaymentFormaldehyde Emissions for Wood ProductsCertification Under CaliforniaAir Resources Board (CARB)ANSI and ANSI/HPVA StandardsBuilding MaterialsDeck Board Span Ratings and Guardrail SystemsMetal Plate Connected TrussesLight Gauge and Cold Formed Steel ComponentsStructural Insulated Panels (SIPs)AdhesivesGypsum WallboardStructural PlasticsThermal & Moisture Barrier Underlayment
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

***Proposed Site*** September 2014 

DSC MCLOUTH STEEL Gibraltar, Michigan

GIBRALTAR PLANT Wayne County

 Site Location: 

The DSC McLouth Steel Gibraltar Plant is located at 28000 West Jefferson Avenue in Gibraltar, Wayne County, 

Michigan. 

 Site History:

The site is a former industrial facility that operated as an annealing, pickling and cold roll steel mill. The site includes 

the former steel mill building, a leachate treatment lagoon system and three landfills. The leachate control systems 

have been mismanaged which has resulted in contamination to adjacent creeks and drains that lead to the Detroit 

River.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Leachate containing high concentrations of phenolic compounds and metals has resulted from rainwater and ground 

water percolation through steel waste and construction debris. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

Without long-term cleanup efforts, leachate may run into the Detroit River and contaminate both the river and the 

Humbug Marsh wildlife refuge. 

 Response Activities (to date):

In 1999, Detroit Steel Company, Ltd. (DSC) undertook response activities at the property required by an 

administrative order with the EPA. The order requires DSC to stop the exposure of migratory birds to solid wastes at 

the treatment pond and to protect wildlife and wildlife habitat from any harmful effects of solid waste. DSC has 

stopped complying with the order. The state has managed the leachate collection since 2008 with limited funds that 

will soon be exhausted. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

State and local elected officials have requested the EPA to consider this site for inclusion on the National Priorities 

List. If left unmanaged leachate from the site could eventually contaminate the Detroit River and Humbug Marsh. The 

EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Dockets OST-00-7168 and OST-00-7197]

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of order to show cause (Order 2000-9-20).

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order (1) finding that TIE Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Trans International Express has failed to demonstrate a reasonable operating proposal and (2) denying it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in foreign charter all-cargo transportation and                         *pendente lite*                         exemption.                     

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than October 4, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Dockets OST-00-7168 and OST-00-7197 and addressed to the Department of Transportation Dockets (SVC-124, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Kathy L. Cooperstein, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2337. 

Dated: September 20, 2000. 

A. Bradley Mims, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-24859 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-U
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6604

ERIC B. SAUB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GEORGETT PHILLIPS, Commonwealth Attorney, Individually and Officially; 

THOMAS POTTER, Individually and Officially; KRIS COUGHLIN, Individually 

and Officially; KATRINA EVERETT, Individually and Officially; MATT VAN 

WASSEN, Individually and Officially; MARK MARSHALL, Sheriff, Individually 

and Officially; ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY VIRGINIA; STEVEN EDWARDS, 

Deputy Commonwealth Attorney, Individually and Officially; C.B. NURNEY, 

Individually and Officially; BABATUNDE STOKES, Assistant Medical Examiner, 

Individually and Officially; SAMUEL PERFETTI, Individually and Officially; C. 

TRUMBLE, Magistrate; Individually and Officially; ELIZABETH C. 

STAHLMAN, Magistrate; Individually and in his or her Official Capacity; 

MANDY L. OWENS, Magistrate, Individually and Officially; APPLE; 

FACEBOOK; CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; REGUS; W. 

PARKER COUNCIL, Judge, Individually and Officially; JOHN F. DAFFRON, 

JR., Judge, Individually and Officially; SEAN DOLAN, Chief Magistrate, 

Individually and Officially; FRED JACKSON, Region 8 Magistrate Supervisor, 

Individually and Officially,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DR. ROB ROBINSON, Medical Examiner, Individually and in his official 

capacity; CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA; JOHN DOE, Detective, Individually 

and in their official capacities; WILLIAM DARDEN, Detective, Individually and 

in their official capacities; JEFFREY LAWRANCE, Detective, Individually and in 

their official capacities; MICHAEL HENZEY, in his capacity as assistant 

commonwealth Attorney; DETECTIVE CORPORAL RHODY, Hampton Police 

Department; Individually and in his Official Capacity
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00414-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: September 21, 2017 Decided: October 18, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric B. Saub, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Eric B. Saub appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Saub v. Phillips, No. 3:16-cv-00414-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. May 1, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Gugino, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Cannizzaro*(167 AD2d 871 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
|   | CERTIFICATION |
|--------|---------------|

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of SCANA Corporation; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 3, 2011 |                                              |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |  /s/Jimmy E. Addison                         |
|                                 | Jimmy E. Addison                                  |
|                                 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
AAM-12-527-E 

September 12, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10181A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1234 

Mr. Brian H. Short 

Director of Operations 

Capital City Jet Center 

2000 Norton Road 

Columbus, OH 43228 

Dear Mr. Short: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10181. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated August 27, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Capital City Jet Center for an extension of Exemption No. 10181. That 

exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Capital 

City Jet Center, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Capital City Jet 

Center. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10181 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Capital City Jet Center are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Capital City Jet Center part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10181 to January 31, 2015, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
|                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                                         
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Percentage of Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Percent)
|                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                         
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Percentage of Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Percent)
|                                                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 4.4    | 6.2    | 6.1    | 14.1   | 12.9   | 12.1   | 18.7   | 30.5  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 42.2   | 50.2   | 42.2   | 38.5   | 36.2   | 41.9   | 40.1   | NA     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of Child Support Enforcement

# AGENCY:

Office of Child Support Enforcement, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of award. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant award is being made to the State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development to further support their Child Support Demonstration Evaluation project. This project will continue the evaluation of the Wisconsin child support passthrough and disregard policy, through the analysis of a later cohort of participants, longer-term follow-up, and an evaluation of the impact of changes in the pass-through policy.

This three-year project is being funded noncompetitively, because it is expected to provide valuable information useful to this Department and other practitioners regarding research and demonstration initiatives related to welfare reform, child support, and the well-being of low-income children and families. Wisconsin will build on their work in the Child Support Demonstration Evaluation project and do an extensive analysis of the effects of passing through child support payments to families as well as the effects on child support enforcement performance. The cost of the project is $463,836 for three years. The period of this funding will extend through September 29, 2003.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gaile Maller, Office of Child Support Enforcement, Administration for Children and Families, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Telephone: 202-401-5368.

Dated: September 15, 2000.

David Gray Ross,

Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 00-24596  Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -1     | 22     | -2    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -7     | 39     | 93     | -15    | 90     | -127   | 55     | 26     | 124    | -46   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 94     | 110    | 183    | -62    | 95     | 64     | 33     | -21    | -1     | -48   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -3     | 28     | 27     | 21     | 13     | 8      | -26    | -27    | -64    | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -34    | 728    | -743   | -78    | -3     | 288    | 112    | -64    | -257   | 36    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 87     | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00307-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

431st District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-09620-393

and

462nd District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-3822-462

Before Bassel, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE JEFFREY MANN, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 21, 2021