alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32(b)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
      Koeppel, the chief financial officer of





Southwestern
      Electric Power Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Holly Keller Koeppel


Holly
      Keller Koeppel


Chief
      Financial Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 5 Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 21    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 5,851  | 262    | 520    | 0      | 601    | 2,396  | 3,090  | 1,264  | 276   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 270    | 260    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 9      | 1      | 50     | 387    | 2      | 129    | 9      | 61     | 94    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 32     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Shook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    KEVIN M. SHOOK                 
|Kevin M. Shook Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 14, 2008
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130869 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, VENUS FLEMISTER, Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of Ray Flemister, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130869 COA: 266223 Wayne CC: 04-409314-NH TRAVELING MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., and GARY G. ERRIGO, D.C., PA-C, Defendants-Appellants,

and

ARNOLD HOME, INC., DR. MARVIN TRIMAS, DR. GODOFREDO C. SANTIAGO, DR. DANIEL REDDY, DR. BHAMINI SUDHIR, and SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 26, 2006, th e application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the

decision in Washington v Sinai Hosp ital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641). On order of the Court, the case ha ving been decided on June 27, 2007, 478 Mich 412 (2007), the application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-134446 ) is pending on appeal

before this Court and that the decision in th at case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the app lication be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk
July 23, 2001

Eugene Davis
Chairman and CEO
World Wide Wireless Communication
520 Third Street, Suite 101
Oakland, CA  94607

          Re: World Wide Wireless Communication

Dear Eugene:

          This is a letter agreement dated July 23, 2001 between Worldwide
Wireless Communications, Inc. ("Worldwide") and Andrew Corporation ("Andrew").

          Whereas Worldwide initially purchased products from Andrew for their
project in Argentina and Worldwide now wants to return all products it currently
possesses for this project and, in exchange for the return of these products
from its California facility and from the Argentina customs facility included in
the product listing on Attachment A by Worldwide in good condition, Andrew
agrees to forgive the entire outstanding balance owed to Andrew by Worldwide
inclusive of interest and penalties in the amount of approximately
$1,400,458.36. Worldwide will also make every reasonable effort to return
products listed on Attachment A that may currently be stored with its Argentina
partner, which are believed to be valued at less than $75,000. The above
agreement is subject to the following conditions.

1.   This agreement requires that all product or inventory is subject to final
     count and identification of inventory by Worldwide Wireless and
     Andrew/Andrew's Agent.

2.   Andrew will pay the shipping.

3.   The equipment will be shipped to:

                    Andrew Corporation
                    8220 E. Gelding Dr.
                    Scottsdale, AZ  85260

          In consideration of the above and the mutual covenants contained
herein, the parties agree to a full and final settlement of all transactions to
date.

                                       Very truly yours,
                                       ANDREW CORPORATION



                                       By:________________________


Agreed.
WORLDWIDE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


By:_____________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: April 3, 2013





By:/s/ Michael ShafferName:Michael ShafferExecutive Vice President andChief Operating & Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### 4/24/2015 OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY

COANo. 12-13-00253-CR 

### SULLIVAN, JOSEPH EDWARD Tr. Ct. No. 007-1018-12 PD-0270-15 

## The Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court requires ten copies ofthis documentto be filed inthis office within three (3) 

## days pursuantto Rule 9.3(b). Failureto send copieswill resultinthe refusal ofthe petition.] Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * -n o _•. |— 

### 5 J K m =r o

"n



# IN CO 

# Court c V "S 3a 30

>5 •a —i J^ i*o IV5 § O M TI c nU^ Ol W > ^\ D "V

X^ m T> =,* m

' j _> r„ 1 o
#### Patricia Greiner, Individually and as Conservator of Joseph Greiner, as Conservatee, Appellant, v Whitesboro School District et al., Respondents. Raymond Conover, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel Conover, Deceased, Appellant, v Whitesboro School District, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In these actions seeking to impose liability upon defendant school district for the death of Daniel Con-over, a high school student, and for serious injuries sustained by Joseph Greiner, a fellow student, plaintiffs appeal from an order granting the school district’s motion for summary judgment dismissing both complaints against it. The injuries resulted from an automobile accident that occurred two to three hours after Conover was suspended from school and ordered to leave the building, allegedly while he was in an intoxicated condition. Moreover, it occurred after Conover and Greiner engaged in further drinking at Conover’s home, at a time when neither student would have been in school even if they had not left early.

The court properly granted the school district’s motion for summary judgment. The school’s negligence, if any, was not the proximate cause of the injuries. Even assuming that the school breached a duty to Conover, the school’s conduct was so attenuated from the injuries as to preclude liability as a matter of law. The accident occurred between two and three hours after Conover was suspended. In the interim, Conover had driven home safely and had at least five drinks. Like the accident itself, that drinking took place at a time when Conover, in ordinary circumstances, would have been outside the school’s custody and control. We thus conclude that, in terms of its causal relationship to the injuries, the school’s alleged negligence in discharging Conover was superseded by his subsequent voluntary intoxication and drunk driving. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### Robert A. Phillips et al., Respondents, v John Serbalik, Appellant.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered November 27, 1989 in Warren County, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and (2) from an order of said court, entered March 9, 1990 in Warren County, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s cross motion to vacate the prior judgment.

Under the circumstances of this case and given the fact that this court by its previous decision already determined that there was no abuse of discretion by Supreme Court in directing defendant to be examined or else be precluded from giving testimony or offering proof in the action (157 AD2d 902), there was likewise no abuse of discretion in the court’s granting summary judgment to plaintiffs when defendant failed to comply with the prior order *(see, Henderson v Stilwell,*116 AD2d 861, *Iv denied*68 NY2d 606). Defendant’s conduct throughout has been only one of delay *(see, Linwood Roofing & Contr. Co. v Olit Assocs.,*123 AD2d 840). Furthermore, the court’s rejection of defendant’s cross motion to vacate the summary judgment was also proper *(see, De Leo v Bertucci,*98 AD2d 708).

Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-63/05 (1)

(2006/C 60/68)

(Language of the case: Greek)

By order of 14 December 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-63/05: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

----

(1)OJ C 82, 02. 04. 2005.

----
GEORGIA
INTERNATIONAL MINING CORP.







Exhibit
32.1 - Certifications






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, Ed
Forister,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-K of
Georgia International Mining Corporation for the period ending December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information 
contained in this report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of  Georgia International Mining
Corporation.




April 14,
2009




/s/
Ed
Forister


Ed
Forister, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and


Chief
Accounting Officer, Georgia International Mining Corp.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130214 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PAMELA L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130214 COA: 254906 Wayne CC: 03-315615-NI MICHAEL A. WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4516 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methidathion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Methidathion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHIDATHION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.02 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Methidathion) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4516 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT00-36-001]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Errata Filing

September 19, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 13, 2000, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, a correction to its September 1, 
2000 filing of its report of recalculated Operational Segment Capacity 
Entitlements to become effective November 1, 2000.
    Texas Eastern states that its September 1 Filing failed to reflect 
the operational segment capacity entitlements of one of its customers. 
Accordingly, Appendices A and A1 have been revised to include the 
operational segment capacity entitlements for Proliance Energy LLC.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on all 
affected customers of Texas Eastern and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24516 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M