alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Order entered October 4, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00706

- CR

ROBERT ERWIN JACKSON

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Crim inal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 15

- 56643

- I



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 30, 2016 motion to extend time for filing appellant’s

brief. We ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 8, 2016.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
`Promissory Note
$ 75,000.00 USD               Temple, Texas                    Date April 11, 01


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 

              THE SUM OF TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00)

In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.5% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.

THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00) principal due in one year (on or
before April 11, 2002). Interest of 1,500.00 per year payable in monthly amounts
of $125.00 on the 11th of each month

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
onstitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.

                            David Hancock, President`
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-1141V 

 Filed: October 30, 2017 

UNPUBLISHED 

CHRISTINA JELIC, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Damages Decision Based on Proffer; 

Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder 

Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

 

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. 

Robert Paul Coleman, III, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On September 14, 2016, Christina Jelic (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left 

shoulder injury as a result of an influenza vaccine she received on October 28, 2013. 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters. 

On October 30, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner 

entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On October 30, 2017, respondent filed a combined 

Rule 4 report/proffer on award of compensation (“Rule 4/Proffer”) indicating petitioner 

should be awarded $111,713.14. Rule 4/Proffer at 4. In the Rule 4/Proffer, respondent 

represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 

4/Proffer. 

 Pursuant to the terms stated in the Rule 4/Proffer, the undersigned awards 

petitioner a lump sum payment of $111,713.14 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner, Christina Jelic. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under § 300aa-15(a). 

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Dear Mr. Adams: 

Keith Wallace [keith@alpenalegal.com] 

Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:40PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Air Service for Alpena County Regional Airport 

Re: Air Service for Alpena County Regional Airport 

.. 

• We need guaranteed code-sharing (integrated reservation system). *Over 3 million dollars in Essential Air 

Service subsidy for less service is not a good use of taxpayer money. 

• If Alpena passengers experience a cancelled flight in Cleveland, there are very few options in getting home 

when compared to Detroit. 

• The current bid does not give us clear expectations on ticket prices in all situations. 

• The planes proposed are much smaller - with no restrooms. Although the air time is 45 minutes, the actual 

time on the plane is much longer, possibly leaving people in a very uncomfortable situation. 

• Our community deserves better - the Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center and the Thunder Bay 

National Marine Sanctuary have a very important need for reliable air service that the current bids do not meet. 

• The current bidder does not have a strong network of support. There are a limited number of planes available 

for them to serve their market(s) so where does that leave us when a plane experiences mechanical issues? 

• Cleveland is not a gateway airport and would add an extra stop to most flights. This adds time and expense 

to our travelers. 

• We would like the DOT to re-bid service to Alpena so we can find a better solution. 

• We need more time on this because the issue is more about lack of competition than it is about cost and we 

need time to find the best solution for all parties involved. 

• Alpena's traffic is up two years in a row and our projections, based on economic development projects and 

activity show continued increases in traffic. 

• Cancelled seats are currently being used when figuring load factors and are driving that percentage down. 

Seats on cancelled flights should not be counted as open seats when figuring load factors. 

Keith Wallace 

Isackson, Wallace & Pfeifer, P.C. 

114 S. Second Ave. 

Alpena, MI 49707 

(989) 354-8242 

fax: (989) 356-3369 

1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2019

No. 04-19-00536-CV

Arturo DELGADILLO,

Appellant

v.

BANDERA AUTO SALES,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19868

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On September 20, 2019, this court received appellant’s brief. The brief violates rule 38.1

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in that the brief lacks a list of the parties and counsel, 

a table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, a statement of the issues presented, 

a statement of facts, and a summary of the argument. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. The brief also

violates rule 38.1 in that it does not contain any citations to authorities or to the record. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(g), (i), In addition, the brief does not contain a certificate of compliance or 

a certificate of service as required by rules 9.4 and 9.5, respectively, of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(3), 9.5(e). It is therefore ORDERED that the 

brief filed by the appellant is STRICKEN from our record. It is further ORDERED that 

appellant file an amended brief, in compliance with Rules 9.4, 9.5, and 38.1, that remedies the 

omissions identified above. It is further ORDERED that appellant’s amended brief is due to be 

filed in this court no later than thirty days from the date of this order or this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9, 42.3.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Stevens, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Our court previously held this appeal in abeyance and remitted the matter to Erie County Court for a hearing on the propriety of the prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges to exclude all prospective black jurors from the jury *(People v Stevens,*145 AD2d 925). After a full hearing, County Court issued a written decision finding that the prosecutor had failed to provide racially neutral reasons for excluding all four black members of the 46-person venire, and had consciously attempted to exclude members of defendant’s race from being seated on the panel. The record at the reconstruction hearing fully supports the hearing court’s conclusion that there was a violation of the principles enunciated in *Batson v Kentucky*(476 US 79). Thus, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Defendant’s remaining issues on appeal are either without merit or were not properly preserved for appellate review. Since we have granted defendant a new trial, however, we would note that the testimony of an Assistant District Attorney on the victim’s prior identification of defendant at the preliminary hearing constituted improper bolstering *(see, People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969; *People v Cioffi,*1 NY2d 70; *People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Wolfgang, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Texas--RRC District 8A Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Texas--RRC District 8A Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30     | 1      | 6      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40286

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

RAUL E. ELIZONDO,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Elizondo has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 19, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40286 Document: 00513278015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2015
No. 15-40286

2

Elizondo has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40286 Document: 00513278015 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2015
|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                           
|Mississippi Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4694 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4694

     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
                             Spiromesifen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

    Mr. Graves of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
                             Spiromesifen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING SPIROMESIFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Product mixtures   2.5%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          containing                                                        12/31/2015
                          Spiromesifen: 3-
                          Mesityl-2-oxo-1-
                          oxaspiro[4.4]non-
                          3-en-4-yl 3,3-
                          dimethylbutyrate
                          (CAS No. 283594-
                          90-1), including
                          application
                          adjuvants
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.91.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```