alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4447 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain acrylic staple fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

acrylic staple fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain acrylic staple fibers) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4447 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the

report and recommendation of the Honorable Beverly R. Stites,

United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-3723

___________

Billy Lee Smith, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Arkansas.

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 6, 1996

 Filed: December 12, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Billy Lee Smith was convicted by a jury of possession of

ephedrine, a listed chemical, with intent to manufacture

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(1). He was

sentenced to 92 months of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, and his

conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. The present appeal is

taken from district court's1 denial of Smith's motion pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255.

After careful consideration of the record and the parties'

briefs, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed

Smith's motion, and that an opinion would lack precedential value.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 3 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 19    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 16     | 16     | 73     | 115    | 23     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### GEE v. STATE.

No. 26099.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*46WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Judgment was rendered on May 6, 1952, and on the same day notice of appeal was given and an appeal bond was entered into and approved by the sheriff.

The term of court did not expire until August 2, 1952.

An appeal bond entered into during the term of court at which the case was tried and notice of appeal given does not confer jurisdiction on 'this Court, a recognizance being required by statute during the term. See Art. 830, C.C.P.; Duncan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 246 S.W.2d 877; Fowler v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 450, 228 S.W.2d 512; Turner v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 614, 223 S.W.2d 236.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 98F-0290] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive petition (FAP 8B4586) proposing that the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of certain olefin basic copolymers, derived from ethylene and alpha monomers with eight or fewer carbon atoms, as articles or as components of articles intended for use in contact with food. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Hortense S. Macon, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-206), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3086. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 7, 1998 (63 FR 25212), FDA announced that a food additive petition (FAP 8B4586) had been filed by the Dow Chemical Co., 2030 Dow Center, Midland, MI 48674. The petition proposed to amend the food additive                           ( print page 58558)                        regulations in § 177.1520                     *Olefin polymers*                     (21 CFR 177.1520) to provide for the safe use of certain olefin basic copolymers derived from ethylene and alpha monomers with eight or fewer carbon atoms, as articles or as components of articles intended for use in contact with food. The Dow Chemical Corporation has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).                 

Dated: September 8, 2000. 

Alan M. Rulis, 

Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 00-24959 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### S. C. TABOR, Appellant, v. Charles MADDIX et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 18, 1954.

H. R. Wilhoit, Grayson, for appellant.

O. F. Duval, Olive Hill, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Carter Circuit Court confirming an award of an arbitrator allowing appellees $258 each for lost wages as a result of a labor dispute. The facts, questions raised, authorities cited and applicable law have been carefully considered. We find no error.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Start Date :
 Compensation :
 Annual Base Salary
  Bonus Incentive Program
  Equity Awards




---



##### 



Performance Evaluation/Salary Review :
  Health & Welfare Benefits :
  Group Medical
 Group Dental Insurance
 Group Vision Insurance
 Group Life Insurance
 Long & Short Term Disability
 IRS Section 125
 Executive Premium Health Benefit




---



##### 



The Retirement Program
  1.
    
    You will be vested at 100% on your first day of eligibility after 6 months of
employment and worked 1,000 hours.2.
    
    Company will make a contribution equal to 3% of employees base salary on a
quarterly basis after six (6) months of employment. No employee match is required.
 Other Benefits :
 Holidays
 Paid Time Off (PTO) Annual Accrual
 Date of Hire  completing 2 yrs.
    
    4.615 hrs/pay period = 3 weeks/year3 years  completing 14 yrs.
    
    6.154 hrs/pay period = 4 weeks/year15 or more years
    
    7.692 hrs/pay period = 5 weeks/year
 Change of Control/Severance Agreement
 Health Club Membership
 Parking
 Obligations of Employee During & After Employment
 Records
 Competitors of the Company




---



##### 



Non-Solicitation




---



##### 



DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
 /s/
Stephen KimStephen KimVice President, General Counsel
& Human Resources  Acceptance:
    

/s/
Linda SegreLinda Segre
 cc:
    
    Personnel File
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6387** 

HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. WENELISA NAVARRO, M.D.; ISAIAS TESSEMA, M.D.; ERWIN ALDANA, M.D. , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the Unit ed States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv - 01985

- AW )

Submitted : January 20, 2012 Decided: February 1, 2012

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by u n published per curiam opinion
. Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Kat r ina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Hugh Maurice Allen Wade appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district c ourt. Wade v. Navarro , No. 8:09

- cv - 01985

- AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11 & entered Sept. 14, 2009; filed May 17 & entered May 18, 2010; Feb. 8, 2011). In addition, we decline to exercise continuing jurisdiction over Wade’s case. See Procunier v. Martinez , 416 U.S. 396, 404

- 05 (1974) (absent constitutional violations, federal courts should be reluctant to interfere with state prison administration). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|New York Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4596 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4596

 To extend the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum sulfonic acids, 
                             sodium salts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum sulfonic acids, 
                             sodium salts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM PETROLEUM SULFONIC ACIDS, SODIUM SALTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.34.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sodium petroleum sulfonic 
acids, sodium salts) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# TIMES AND DATES:

9 a.m., Monday, October 2, 2000; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 3, 2000.

# PLACE:

Previously Published.

# STATUS:

October 2 (Closed); October 3 (Open).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

#### Addition to Agenda

Tuesday, October 3—8:30 a.m. (Open)

Fiscal Year 2001 Annual Performance Plan

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

David G. Hunter, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

## TENTATIVE AGENDA

### Monday Session

#### *October 2—9 a.m.*                         (Closed)—San Diego Marriott in Marina Ballroom D                    

1. Financial Performance. (Mr. Richard Strasser)

2. Fiscal Year 2001 Integrated Financial Plan. (Mr. Richard Strasser)

3. Establish/Deploy Process. (Mr. Patrick Donahoe)

4. Fiscal Year 2001 EVA Variable Pay Program. (Ms. Yvonne Maguire)

5. Overview of the Sales Organization. (Ms. Gail Sonnenberg)

6. Briefing on Advertising. (Mr. Allen Kane)

7. EEO Settlement Authority. (Ms. Mary Anne Gibbons)

8. Personnel Matters.

9. Compensation Issues.

### Tuesday Session

#### *October 3—8:30 a.m.*                         (Open)—San Diego Marriott in Marina Ballroom D                    

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, August 28-29, 2000.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO. (Mr. William Henderson)

3. Fiscal Year 2001 Annual Performance Plan. (Chairman Dyhrkopp)

4. Board of Governors Calendar Year 2001 Meeting Schedule. (Chairman Dyhrkopp)

5. Office of the Governors FY 2001 Budget. (Chairman Dyhrkopp)

6. Preliminary FY 2002 Appropriation Request. (Mr. Richard Strasser)

7. Capital Investments.

a. Champaign, Illinois, Processing and Distribution Facility Expansion. (Mr. Danny Jackson)

b. Stamford, Connecticut—New Springdale Station Additional Funding. (Ms. Diane Van Loozen)

8. Report on the San Diego District.

9. Tentative Agenda for the November 13-14, 2000, meeting in Washington, DC.

[FR Doc. 00-24912 Filed 9-25-00; 2:12 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 1 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 1 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 300    | 369    | 499    | 340   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 82     | 188    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023