alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Boston,                May 11, 2007                             |                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                             | Peter                J. Sonnabend  |   |
|   | Name:                Peter J. Sonnabend                         |                               |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman |                               |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                             | Stephanie                Sonnabend |   |
|   | Name:                Stephanie Sonnabend                        |                               |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer and President     |                               |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   |                                                            |                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                             | Boy                van Riel        |   |
|   | Name:                Boy A. J. van Riel                         |                               |
|   | Title:                Vice President and Treasurer              |                               |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet at the Mapleton Ranger District Office in Florence, OR, on October 12, 2000, to begin a field trip to Enchanted Valley. The Mapleton Ranger District Office is located at 4480 Hwy. 101, Building G, Florence, OR. The trip will begin at 9 a.m. and end at approximately 2 p.m.                               ( print page 58260)                            Bring a lunch and field gear, including waterproof boots. The public is encouraged to attend but must bring its own transportation.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541/750-7075 or write to Acting Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, OR 97339.

Dated: September 18, 2000.

Y. Robert Iwamoto,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-24864 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This letter is written at the request of Gryphon Air LLC in support of its application on humanitarian grounds for 

exemption from the prohibition imposed on US Air Carriers, US Registered Aircraft and US Certificate Holders to 

operate within the Baghdad Flight Information Region (FIR). This is an urgent request and as such, your 

anticipated timely support with regards to the same would be much appreciated. 

For almost 25 years, International SOS and a subsidiary of International SOS, RMSI, have collectively been 

providing a comprehensive range of medical services globally, some of which include medical evacuations 

throughout the Middle East region, including Iraq. The beneficiaries of these services include the staff of leading 

multinational oil and gas organizations and various governmental organizations such as the US Department of 

Defence, the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, the United Nations and the Organization for Security and 

Co-operation in Europe. 

When necessary, International SOS and RMSI use the services of reputable air carriers to provide emergency 

medical airlifts to and between various countries in the Middle East, including Iraq). Many of the patients it 

provides these services to are US citizens working in support of US agencies, civilian employees of US 

government agencies and US military personnel. The lack of reliable air ambulance transport has occasionally led 

to delays, which has placed patients' lives at risk and their medical recovery in jeopardy. 

As a viable solution, RMSI has contracted with Gryphon Air LLC, a company formed under the laws of the State of 

Wyoming, to provide air ambulance services. Members of Gryphon Air LLC previously owned and operated 

Gryphon Airlines South Africa, an airline which successfully provided public air charter services between Kuwait, 

Iraq, Dubai and Afghanistan from 2007 until 2014. Shortly after Gryphon Air LLC's formation in June 2014, it 

made an application for and was awarded a US FAR Part 135 Certificate. 

We are confident in Gryphon Air LLC's ability to provide our client's employees and patients with safe and reliable 

air services in Iraq. Over the past 8 years, Gryphon Air LLC has become a trusted and proven name in Middle 

East aviation. Furthermore, utilizing the services of a US Certificated Air Carrier increases our safety margin and 

improves our ability to provide a "Fly America Acf' compliant product. 

In conclusion, Gryphon Air LLC requires an exemption from SFAR 77 to be able to serve us and our clients in Iraq. 

Favourable consideration of this request would significantly increase our ability to better serve US Nationals 

requiring MEDEVAC services out of Iraq. 

Thank you for your kind consideration. 

Please feel free to contact us at +971 4 601 8777 should any additional information be required. 

International SOS MEA (Branch) 

Dubai Airport Free Zone Authority (DAFZA), PO BOX 54757 Dubai-UAE 

t +971 46018888 f +97146018899 

DXB Assistance Centre t +971 4 601 8777 

internationalsos.com
## NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00 554

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRIST I

- EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellant,

v.

JAVIER BONIFACIO BARRERA ALANIZ

, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justice s Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Appellee’s counsel, Johnathan Ball, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as

c ounsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him to withdraw

because he is now employed by the Hidalgo County District Attorney’s Office as the

Border Crimes Unit prosecutor.2

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State , 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.

-- Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

ap pointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellee’s court

- appointed

attorney should remain as appellee's counsel; and, if not, whether appellee is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellee’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter

an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,

the na me, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of the newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall

further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

3rd d ay of May , 201 6

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Trottie, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered June 25, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During his trial testimony, one of the People’s witnesses, for the first time, identified the defendant as having been present at a time and location proximate to the crime. The defendant contended that the in-court identification was improper because the People had failed to give notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. "However, the notice required by CPL 710.30 (1) (b) pertains to an anticipated in-court identification by a witness who has previously identified a defendant” *(People v Dozier,*150 AD2d 483, 484). Here, since the witness had failed to make a previous identification of the defendant, no such notice was required *(see, People v Monroig,*111 AD2d 935). Therefore, the trial court properly admitted the in-court identification. We note that the defendant had the opportunity, on *439cross-examination, to explore the witness’s failure to identify the defendant from a photographic array.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 6      | 24     | 106    | 125    | 125    | 744    | 451    | 328   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 135    | 177    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                           
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                        
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                                 

The undersigned, Peter Wilson, the Chief Executive Officer and
William D. Thomas the Chief Financial Officer of Sono Resources Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended May 31, 2011, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1), as amended, fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 4, 2011

|By: | /s/ Peter Wilson                                        | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Peter Wilson                                            | 
|    | President, Chief Executive Officer and a
      director | 

|By: | /s/ William D. Thomas                  | 
|--- | -------------------------------------- | 
|    | William D. Thomas                      | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer and a director | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,859
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              21
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    134,632
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          53,541
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,268
<LOANS>                                        509,133
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 742,907
<DEPOSITS>                                     645,735
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,237
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,119
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,592
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 742,907
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,712
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,866
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   614
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                41,192
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,770
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,189
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,003
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,763
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  74
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,190
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,190
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,190
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.86
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,093
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,918
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,651
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,366
<RECOVERIES>                                       544
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,851
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,851
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2486
SAM GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Charlotte, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-2701
SAM GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Charlotte, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-346-3-MU) Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 29, 19972 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sam Green, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Sam Green appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) in this employment discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended , 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, 2000e-2 (1994). UNCC cross-appeals the district court's order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of proper process and service of process. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion granting summary judgment and find no reversible error. Therefore, in No. 96-2486, we affirm the grant of summaryjudgment on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. University of North Carolina, No. CA-93-346-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 1996). In light of this determination, we find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court properly denied UNCC's motion to dismiss. Cf. Chesapeake Paper Prods. Co. v. Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp. , 51 F.3d 1229, 1234-37 (4th Cir. 1995). Thus, we affirm in No. 96-2701 as well. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### THOMASON v. STATE.

No. 24748.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 26, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of failing to stop and render aid after an automobile collision in which a person was injured and by the jury awarded a fine of $300.00 and nine months in jail, and he appeals.

There is no statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. All matters of procedure appear regular herein.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                    
|No chart available.                                                    
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023