alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -5    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -3     | 7      | 46     | 83     | -16    | -6     | 1      | 6      | 3      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 64     | -4     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Ex parte LOPER.

No. 24373.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1949.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was granted a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court of Houston County, alleging that he was illegally held by the authorities of the state prison system upon a conviction in the District Court of Harris County wherein he was convicted of rape and assessed a penalty of *82fifty years in the penitentiary. He claimed herein that this conviction was void for many reasons, all of which are matters that could have and should have been urged upon the trial of the Harris County case or upon an appeal therefrom. He failed to appeal such cause.

It appears that the Harris County court had jurisdiction over the matter and power to hear and determine the same, and also the power to render the judgment which it did render. The judgment therein appears to be a valid one and is not subject to this attempted collateral attack. All matters offered herein should have been raised in the trial and appeal from the Harris County case.

Upon a hearing hereof the judge of the Houston County District Court remanded relator to the custody of the prison authorities from which he appealed.

We express the opinion that this is an attempt to collaterally attack the Harris County judgment, and, as heretofore stated, all matters here offered should have been presented in the trial of the Harris County case.

The writ of habeas corpus cannot be resorted to in lieu of an appeal. See Ex parte Clinnard, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 460, 169 S.W.2d 181; Ex parte Minor, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 159, 172 S.W.2d 347; Ex parte Bonds, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 198, 185 S.W.2d 984; Ex parte Lagrone, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 390, 187 S.W.2d 574; Ex parte Ricketts, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 569, 189 S.W.2d 872.

The judgment refusing such discharge is therefore affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for a rehearing in which he reasserts the same matters which were urged on the original submission of this case. His contentions were fully discussed by us in the original opinion, and a proper disposition was made thereof.

Therefore, the motion for a rehearing is overruled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-554-000]

Take notice that on September 20, 2000, Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC (Pine Needle) tendered for filing a motion that dealt with compliance with section 284.12(c)(3) of the Commission's regulations and certain Gas industry Board Standards. Pine Needle's filing also requested action with respect to Commission Order No. 587-L, which requires pipelines to permit shippers to offset imbalances of different contracts and to trade imbalances by November 1, 2000. Order No. 587-L also requires pipelines to file the necessary tariff changes no earlier than 60 days prior to November 1, 2000. The issues raised by Pine Needle in their September 20, 2000 filing regarding Commission Order No. 587-L will be addressed in the above-docketed proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (Call 202-208-2222 for asssistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24985 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                      
|Texas - RRC District 1 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                      
|Texas - RRC District 1 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 388    | 588    | 1,951  | 195   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 210    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58062-58063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-546-000]


WestGas InterState, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 15, 2000, WestGas InterState, Inc. 
(WGI), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of March 27, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 65
Second Revised Sheet No. 66
First Revised Sheet No. 68
Second Revised Sheet No. 71
Second Revised Sheet No. 75
First Revised Sheet No. 76
First Revised Sheet No. 81

    WGI states that copies of this filing have been served on WGI's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://
www.ferc.fed.us/online/

[[Page 58063]]

rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24767 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas - RRC District 7B Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas - RRC District 7B Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 64    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 85     | 102    | 105    | 133    | 106    | 104    | 109    | 92     | 98     | 73    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 76     | 82     | 68     | 79     | 62     | 70     | 65     | 59     | 51     | 36    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 29     | 25     | 32     | 43     | 90     | 133    | 203    | 274    |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4853 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4853

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methoxycarbonyl-
      terminated perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methoxycarbonyl-
      terminated perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHOXYCARBONYL-TERMINATED PERFLUORINATED POLYOXYMETHYLENE-
              POLYOXYETHYLENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methoxycarbonyl-terminated 
perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 19, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-11-00636-CR

____________

BENJAMIN CHARLES THORNBURG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 52,657

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of attempted aggravated 

kidnapping. The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant under 

community supervision for a period of eight years. Subsequently, the State moved to 

adjudicate guilt. On May 6, 2011, the trial court adjudicated guilt and sentenced appellant 

to confinement for eleven years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 
2

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the 

right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). As of this date, no pro se response has 

been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We 

are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response 

when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 

178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Jamison and McCally.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
----

Action brought on 12 December 2005 — Ajinomoto/OHIM

(Case T-436/05)

(2006/C 74/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Ajinomoto Co., Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) [represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers]

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kaminomoto Co. Ltd. (Hyogo-Ken, Japan)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘AJINOMOTO’ for goods in classes 1, 5, 29, 30 and 31 — application No 1 307 024

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Kaminomoto Co. Ltd.

Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘KAMINOMOTO’ for goods in class 3

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 since the Board of Appeal according to the applicant held that the opponent in the opposition proceedings only had to prove the existence of an earlier right at the time of the filing of the opposition. According to the applicant it is the time of the decision of the Opposition Division, or alternatively when the time-limit for providing further evidence expires, by which an earlier right has to be proven to be in force.

----
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023