alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4849 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue commercial 

use authorizations to commercial stock operators for operations in designated wilderness within the Sequoia and 

Kings Canyon National Parks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4849 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sequoia and Kings 

3 Canyon National Parks Backcountry Access Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL USE AUTHORIZATIONS IN DES5 IGNATED WILDERNESS WITHIN THE SEQUOIA 

6 AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS. 

7 (a) ISSUANCE OF COMMERCIAL USE AUTHORIZA8 TIONS.—Notwithstanding the decision, for the 2012 and 

9 2013 seasons, the Secretary shall issue packer permits at 

10 no more than the levels of commercial services authorized 

11 by the Secretary in 2011 until the Secretary— 

12 (1) makes an extent necessary determination 

13 that addresses the violations of the Wilderness Act 

14 found in the decision; and 

15 (2) begins to issue packer permits for oper16 ations in designated wilderness within the Sequoia 

17 and Kings Canyon National Parks in accordance 

18 with that extent necessary determination reflected in 

19 a Record of Decision for the Wilderness Stewardship 

20 Plan. 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this Act, the 

22 following definitions apply: 

23 (1) DECISION.—The term ‘‘decision’’ means the 

24 January 24, 2012, ruling by the United States Dis25 trict Court for the Northern District of California in 

26 High Sierra Hikers Association v. United States De-
3 

•HR 4849 EH

1 partment of the Interior, et al., Case No. C 09–4621 

2 RS. 

3 (2) EXTENT NECESSARY DETERMINATION.— 

4 The term ‘‘extent necessary determination’’ means a 

5 determination on the need for commercial services 

6 within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park 

7 wilderness under section 4(d)(5) of the Wilderness 

8 Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(5)). 

9 (3) PACKER PERMIT.—The term ‘‘packer per10 mit’’ means a commercial use authorization granted 

11 to a commercial stock operator. 

12 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

13 the Secretary of the Interior. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4849 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to issue comParks, and for other purposes. within the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National operators for operations in designated wilderness mercial use authorizations to commercial stock
Affirmed an d Memorandum Opinion filed January 1 9 , 201 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 1 1

- 00 636

- CR

____________ BENJAMIN CHARLES THORNBURG , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412 t h District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 5 2 , 657



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of attempted aggravated kidnapping

. The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant under community supervision for a period of eight years. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt. On May 6 , 2011 , the trial court adjudicat ed guilt and sentenced appellant

to conf inement for e leven years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant ’ s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. T he brief meets the requirement of Anders v.2

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of
the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. C rim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel ’ s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). As of this date , no pro se response has
been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel ’ s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record

. We
are not to address the merits of each claim r aised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State
, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Jamison and McCally

. Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 484 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 484

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the personal privacy 
              exemption in the Freedom of Information Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

  Mr. Deutch (for himself and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the personal privacy 
              exemption in the Freedom of Information Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Personal Privacy Clarification 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552, 
        requires a Federal agency to disclose records or information in 
        its possession that have been compiled for law enforcement 
        purposes. The Act provides exemptions from this mandatory 
        disclosure requirement, including for ``an unwarranted invasion 
        of personal privacy.'' 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552(b)(7)(C).
            (2) In AT&T Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, the 
        Third Circuit Court of Appeals extended the privacy exemption 
        in section 552(b)(7)(C) to corporations. This decision 
        misinterprets the intent of Congress to limit the privacy 
        exemption to individuals, not to corporations.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to respond to the Third 
Circuit Court of Appeals decision by clarifying that the intent of the 
privacy exemption in section 552(b)(7(C) of the Freedom of Information 
Act is to provide a privacy exemption for individuals, not for 
corporations.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF PRIVACY EXEMPTION.

    Section 552(b)(7)(C) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``personal privacy'' and inserting ``the privacy of any 
individual''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedMarch 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Encore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report inthe Registration Statements of Encore Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-156566, effective January 22, 2009 and File No. 333-167531, effective June 24, 2010) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-144713, effective July 19, 2007 and File No.333-150996, effective May 16, 2008). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Houston Texas 

March 14, 2011
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 26053.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, *1952.*

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Jan. 14, 1953.

No attorney on appeal.

■George' P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the sale of whiskey-in a ■dry area; the punishment, thirty days in jail and á fine of $500.

The State moves to dismiss the' appeal because no notice of appeal is shown to have been entered of record in the trial court. Such is requisite in order for this Court to acquire jurisdiction. Ex parte Logan, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 129, 205 S.W.2d 994.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and To Reinstate Appeal.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the sale of whisky in Scurry County, a dry area. Upon trial before a jury a verdict was returned finding appellant guilty as charged, and assessing a punishment of 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

On March 5, 1951, judgment was rendered by the court in accordance with the verdict. Appellant gave notice of appeal to this court and entered into recognizance on appeal.

The cause was before this court under our Number 25,570, and on December 12, 1951, this appeal was dismissed because the r.ecord did not contain a judgment. Davis v. State, 244 S.W.2d 220.

On January 4, 1952, judgment was entered nunc pro tunc by the trial court, and appellant entered into another recognizance. This appeal is before us under the above number and on original submission was dismissed for want of a proper notice of appeal.

Under the peculiar facts of this case we have decided that we should consider the record from the trial court as contained in both appeals.

The former record contains notice of appeal and a statement of facts. It was stipulated that Scurry County was a dry area. W. A. Phillips, inspector for the Texas Liquor Control Board, testified that he purchased a pint of whisky from appellant in the City of Snyder, for which he paid appellant $4. W. V. Ray, another inspector, testified that he witnessed the sale. Appellant offered no testimony.

The. evidence sustains the . conviction.

As a part of the narrative statement of facts appellant attempts to complain of certain conduct of the County Attorney, *112and of the fact that appellant was not afforded time in which to obtain a lawyer.

There are no bills of exception approved by the trial judge in the record and the complaints cannot be considered. Furthermore, the facts recited would not call for a reversal if presented by bills of exception properly allowed.

The appeal is reinstated and the judgment is now affirmed.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 13    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 543    | 139    | 962    | 2,267  | 4,152  | 13,213 | 4,468  | 4,458  | 5,860  | 6,008 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6,562  | 2,364  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparton Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report),
I, Richard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                                                         
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/Richard L. Langley
Richard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 5, 2003
|
| |  |                                                                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Sparton Corporation and will be retained by Sparton
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

19
Exhibit 10.81
 INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY
 EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
 PREAMBLE
  SECTION 1.
TITLE, PURPOSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE
 1.01. Title
 1.02. Purpose
  1.03. Effective Date
 SECTION 2.
DEFINITIONS
  2.01. Account
 2.02. Affiliate
 1




---



##### 



2.03. Anniversary Year
 2.04. Annual Cash Bonus
 2.05. Base Salary
 2.06. Beneficiary
 2.07. Board
 2.08. Code
 2.09. Committee
 2.10. Company
 2.11. Compensation
 2.12. Compensation Credit
 2.13. ERISA
 2.14. Investment Credit
 2




---



##### 



2.15. Participant
 2.16. Plan
 2.17. Plan Year
 2.18. Spouse
 2.19. Subsidiary
 2.20. Vested Account
 SECTION 3.
PARTICIPATION
 3.01. Designation By Committee .
 3.02. Effective Date of Participation .
 3.03. Revocation of Designation .
  3




---



##### 



SECTION 4.
ACCOUNTS AND EARNINGS
 4.01. Establishment of Accounts .
     4.02. No Requirement to Fund .
 SECTION 5.
FORM AND TIMING OF PAYMENT
 5.01. Distribution of Account .
 4




---



##### 



5.02. Timing of Commencement of Distributions .
  5.03. Form of Distributions .
 Annual Installments
 Lump Sum Distribution
 Distribution of Small Amounts
 5.04. Initial Distribution Election .
 5




---



##### 



SECTION 6.
VESTING OF BENEFITS
 6.01. General .
  6.02. Rehired Participants .
 Vesting
  Pay Status of Prior Benefit
 6




---



##### 



6.03. Redesignated Participants .
 SECTION 7.
SELECTION OF AND PAYMENTS TO BENEFICIARY
 7.01. Beneficiary Designation .
 7.02. Change in Beneficiary .
 7.03. Survivor Benefit .
 SECTION 8.
TAX WITHHOLDING
  7




---



##### 



SECTION 9.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN
 9.01. Duties and Power .
 9.02. Benefit Statements .
 9.03. Right to Accelerate for Certain Tax Payments .
 SECTION 10.
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
 10.01. Right to Amend or Terminate .
 8




---



##### 



SECTION 11.

MISCELLANEOUS
 11.01. Unfunded Plan .
 11.02. No Right to Continued Employment .
 11.03. Prohibition Against Alienation .
 11.04. Savings Clause .
 11.05. Payment of Benefit of Incompetent .
 11.06. Spouses Interest .
 9




---



##### 



11.07. Successors .
 11.08. Gender, Number and Heading .
 11.09. Legal Fees and Expenses .
 11.10. Choice of Law .
 11.11. Affiliated Employees .
 11.12. Plan Document .
  10




---



##### 



SECTION 12.
ARBITRATION
        SECTION 13.
CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS
 13.01. General .
 13.02. Immediate Vesting .
 11




---



##### 



13.03. Joint and Several Liability .
 13.04. Dispute Procedures .
   13.05. Definition of Change in Control .
    12




---



##### 



ITC Holdings Corp.By:Its:
 13
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 36     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4737 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4737

   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Oxadiazon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Huizenga of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Oxadiazon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXADIAZON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Oxadiazon) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.9%'' and inserting ``0.6%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4637 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4637

            To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Toluidine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Altmire introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Toluidine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-TOLUIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        p-Toluidine, (CAS   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          No. 106-49-0)                                                     12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2921.43.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

Lists for the determination of the composition of the formations of the Court

(2006/C 42/08)

At its meeting on 17 January 2006, the Court drew up the list referred to in Article 11b(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the determination of the composition of the Grand Chamber as follows:

At its meeting on 17 January 2006, the Court drew up the list referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the determination of the composition of the Second Chamber as follows:

At its meeting on 17 January 2006, the Court drew up the list referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the determination of the composition of the Fifth Chamber as follows:

----