alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4839 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4839

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sulfur black 1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sulfur black 1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SULFUR BLACK 1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.03 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Sulfur black 1) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Richard L. Langley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sparton Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 10, 2006 /s/ RICHARD L. LANGLEY   Richard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer     
24
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4575 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4575

 To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on Isoxaflutole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on Isoxaflutole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ISOXAFLUTOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.46 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Isoxaflutole) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``4.6%''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      December 8, 2008                                                                       |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Yijun Wang                                                                          |   |   |   |
| Yijun      WangChief      Executive Officer, President, Director(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Ohio Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 495    | 684    | 1,479 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,699  | 965    | 1,141  | 2,030  | 1,541  | 1,331  | 1,420  | 1,069  | 1,229  | 1,275 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,214  | 1,181  | 1,161  | 1,104  | 1,094  | 1,054  | 1,113  | 985    | 890    | 1,179 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,185  | 970    | 1,117  | 1,126  | 974    | 898    | 975    | 1,027  | 985    | 896   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 832    | 758    | 1,233  | 3,161  | 6,723  | 12,104 | 15,143 | 26,123 | 23,759 | 34,056
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 27,514 | 31,580 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4814 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4814

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain electric juice 
                              extractors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain electric juice 
                              extractors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.43 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain electric juice 
extractors) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte WILLIAMS.

No. 26675.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Harris County refusing to discharge appellant on his application for writ of habeas corpus and remanding him to the custody of the sheriff with instructions to deliver him-to the agent of the demanding State.

The warrant of the Governor of this State, together with the demand of the Governor of Oklahoma and supporting papers, was introduced in evidence and establishes a prima facie case.

The appellant and his witnesses sought to establish that the appellant was not in the demanding State on the day charged.

No issue was raised as to appellant’s identity as being the person named in the demand.

The trial court heard the witnesses; we have reviewed their testimony and fail to find any abuse of the court’s discretion.

There are no bills of exception in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32** **Certification** **Pursuant    to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,    Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,    chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of    the undersigned officers of Discovery Holding Company, a    Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby    certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     The Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the    “Form 10-K”)    of the Company fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 and information contained in the    Form 10-K    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company as of    December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three years ended    December 31, 2006.    Dated: February 28, 2007     /s/  John    C. Malone
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 541   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,520  | 1,303  | 209    | 80     | 207    | 355    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CR-00389-DCG

ORDER RESETTING HEARING

The Court RESETS Defendant Patrick Wood Crusius’s rearraignment hearing to 

February 8, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom Number 812 on the Eighth Floor of the United 

States Courthouse, 525 Magoffin Avenue, El Paso, Texas.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 1st day of February 2023.

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 257 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 1
# Gold Star Mother's Day, 2000

America's Armed Forces have stood watch over our freedom for more than two centuries. They have held posts on lonely ridges, spent long days and nights at sea, and faced danger in the skies. They have sacrificed their youth, their time, and even their lives to sustain the foundation on which our country was built and to protect the democratic values that keep our country strong and free.

The mothers of these courageous men and women have also bravely stood watch—in homes once filled with the laughter of children—and waited for word from their loved ones. When the guns of battle fell silent, many mothers' homes were once again filled with the boisterous commotion of their children returning from distant lands. But the homes of Gold Star Mothers remained silent. Their children had made the ultimate sacrifice for our Nation, and Gold Star Mothers were left with the profound sorrow of their heartbreaking loss.

But America's Gold Star Mothers rose above their personal tragedy, and today they continue to stand watch over our Nation. Reaching out to improve the lives of others and to ensure that the noble contributions of their sons and daughters are not forgotten, they are powerful examples of service and sacrifice for us all. With dignity, courage, and compassion, they have worked to promote patriotism, foster peace and goodwill, and extend a helping hand to veterans and those in need. Their generosity of spirit has touched the lives of countless Americans and made certain that the selflessness their children demonstrated in service to our country remains a prominent part of our national character.

For their steadfast devotion to duty and their unwavering commitment to carrying on the proud legacy of their children, we honor these Gold Star Mothers each year. The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 115 of June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895), has designated the last Sunday in September as “Gold Star Mother's Day” and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this day.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 24, 2000, as Gold Star Mother's Day. I call upon all government officials to display the United States flag over government buildings on this solemn day. I also encourage the American people to display the flag and to hold appropriate meetings in their homes, places of worship, or other suitable places as a public expression of the sympathy and respect that our Nation holds for our Gold Star Mothers.                              ( print page 57936)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 00-24908

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Humberto M. Calderon, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Keegan, J.), rendered January 19, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant contends on appeal that County Court exceeded its authority and abused its discretion in revoking his adjudication as a youthful offender at resentencing. First, the plea agreement did not include any guarantee that defendant would be adjudicated a youthful offender. In addition, County Court could not adjudicate defendant a youthful offender and at the same time impose a prison sentence of 2 to 6 years (see, CPL 720.20 [3]; Penal Law § 60.02). Having done so, the court had the power "to correct its sentence, which was illegal as it stood, by immediately revoking the youthful offender adjudication” *(People v Magee,*116 AD2d 742). Finally, given the fact that the sentence was within the plea bargain and County Court found it appropriate in view of the nature of the crime, there was no abuse of discretion in sentencing defendant to 2 to 6 years’ imprisonment.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.5.5



                                 AMENDMENT NO. 5
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment" herein) is
entered into as of August 1, 2001, by and between Walter E. Schoenfeld ("Mr.
Schoenfeld") and Vans, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vans"), with respect to
the following facts:

     A. Vans and Mr. Schoenfeld previously entered into an Employment Agreement,
dated December 1, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement'), which revised and replaced
a Consulting Agreement between the parties;

     B. The Employment Agreement was amended as of February 13, 1998, May 18,
1998, May 18, 1999 and August 1, 2000; and

     C. The parties wish to further amend the Employment Agreement in accordance
with the action taken by the Board of Directors of the Company on June 29, 2001.

     NOW, THEREOFRE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. Section 3 of the Employment Agreement. The term of the Employment
Agreement is hereby extended to May 31, 2003.

     2. Other Provisions of the Employment Agreement. Except as specifically
modified or amended herein, all remaining provisions of the Employment
Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

     3. Miscellaneous. This Amendment shall be governed by California law and
may be executed in counterparts.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.

MR. SCHOENFELD:                      VANS:
                                     Vans, Inc., a Delaware corporation



/s/ Walter E. Schoenfeld             By: /s/ Craig E. Gosselin
    --------------------                 ---------------------
    Walter E. Schoenfeld
                                     Title:  Vice President and General Counsel