alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas--RRC District 8 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas--RRC District 8 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -3     | 1      | 1      | -1     | -23    | 6      | 15     | -80    | 61     | -2    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 53     | -19    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




Section
302 Certification




I, Steven
Dong, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DigitalPost Interactive,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:
      : March 28, 2008/s/ Steven DongSteven
      DongChief Financial
      Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                                   ACS TRUST I

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of ACS Trust I (the "Trust"), dated as of
July 25, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees,
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to form a business trust
under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. Code Section 3801 et seq.) (the
"Act").

         1. Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby is "ACS
Trust I".

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are
Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street,
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective at the
time of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         4. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or
more counterparts.



<PAGE>   2


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the
Trust at the time of filing this Certificate of Trust, have executed this
Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.


                                       WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                       not in its individual capacity but solely
                                       as Delaware Trustee


                                       By:    /s/ JAMES P. LAWLER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  James P. Lawler
                                           Title: Vice President


                                       WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                       not in its individual capacity but solely
                                       as Property Trustee


                                       By:    /s/ JAMES P. LAWLER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  James P. Lawler
                                           Title: Vice President


                                       WILLIAM L. DECKELMAN, JR.,
                                       as Regular Trustee

                                       /s/ WILLIAM L. DECKELMAN
                                       -----------------------------------------


                                       WARREN EDWARDS,
                                       as Regular Trustee

                                       /s/ WARREN D. EDWARDS
                                       -----------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                       EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                       ------------

              ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE

In reference to Contract dated August 22, 2001 between BIGHAM FARMS
INC., a Florida corporation, ("Seller") and SOLOMAN LAM, ("Buyer"),
it is further AGREED as follow:

The closing date will be extended to March 1, 2002. All terms and
conditions remain unchanged and effective.

This addendum, upon its execution by both parties, is herewith made
an integral part of the aforementioned Contract.


                                     Bigham Farms, Inc.


/s/ Soloman Lam                      By: /s/ William J. Bigham
----------------------------         ----------------------------
SOLOMAN LAM, BUYER                   William J. Bigham, Seller
SSN:                                 Tax ID ###-##-####
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3869 — Tessenderlo/Siemens/Advanced Power/JV)

(2006/C 45/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 February 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 88     | 879    | 2      | 4      | 76     | 18     | 315    | 49     | 7      | 8     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 34     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4594 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Octanoyl chloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Octanoyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OCTANOYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Octanoyl chloride (CAS 

No. 111–64–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2915.90.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4594 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solitron Devices, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shevach
Saraf, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

   1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.



                                         /s/ Shevach Saraf
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Shevach Saraf
                                         Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                         Officer, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                         Officer


                                         October 11, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Williams, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), entered on January 9, 1989, convicting him, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 8 to 16 years and from 5 to 10 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

On July 4, 1988, defendant and an accomplice robbed a couple at gunpoint inside the Times Square subway station. After driving a short time with the police officers who responded to the scene, the couple identified their assailants in a small park between 42nd and 43rd Streets.

It was not improper for the court to admit testimony by the complainants of the descriptions they gave to the police officers of defendant within minutes of the commission of the crime. Such testimony is probative for the jury to resolve the issue of identification. “Comparison of the verbal description— made on the basis of recollection alone, close to the time of the crime—with the actual features of the person later corpo*296really identified can assist the jury in evaluating the degree to which the later physical identification may or may not have been the product of intervening memory failure or suggestion.” *(People v Huertas,*75 NY2d 487, 493.)

Generally, it is improper for a prosecutor to elicit testimony from a witness that confirms another witness’s pretrial identification of a defendant. *(People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471, 474-477.) Here, "bolstering” testimony was limited to the fact that a statement had been made, without indicating the substance of the statement, so that any bolstering would be inferential and harmless in view of the strong identification evidence. *(People v Burgess,*66 AD2d 667.)

Defendant’s argument that he was punished for exercising his right to go to trial and that his sentence was excessive in comparison to his codefendant is also without merit. Defendant had a substantial criminal record and was sentenced as a second violent felony offender in contrast to the codefendant who was a first offender. Indeed, defendant’s sentence, although not the minimum, was close to the minimally permissible range. In view of the above, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant.

We have considered the remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, King
Owyang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                                   /s/ King Owyang
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   King Owyang
                                                   President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer
                                                   August 11, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

STANDING ORDER REGARDING

FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN PATENT CASES AND REDACTED 

PLEADINGS

As a public forum, the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to 

documents filed with the Court. Nevertheless, parties in patent cases routinely produce and rely 

on information that is confidential. Therefore, in all patent cases pending before the undersigned, 

the Court hereby grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information 

under seal without filing a separate motion seeking leave of the Court to do so. The filing party 

shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within 

seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents. Exhibits 

that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all. The parties shall 

coordinate to make sure that the public version filing redacts information that any party deems 

confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly 

available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the public version 

shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is actually confidential. 

This Order shall apply in all patent cases, but shall not require parties to file public 

versions of pleadings filed before the date of this Order. 

SIGNED this ___ day of February, 2021. 

_________________________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12th

FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ February 12, 2021 Reuben Amaro

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 82 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-15;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:       /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale