# ;1.

# r~ 

# [ 

# r**r~** 

# [ 

# 0 D [
1-

. 

# I U 

# 0 l. L 

# l L •



## EMISSIONS TEST REPORT HUNTINGTON PLATING, INC. CHROME SCRUBBER STACK HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA DECEMBER 2005



## TI-1162

# ~~+**~** TEST, INCORPORATED Technical Environmental Services Team

Route 

### 2, Box 33-B, Poca, West Virginia 25159 Ph: (304) 755-1077 Fx: (304) 755-1099

# [ [ 

# r [ [ 

# [ 

# o 

# o L [" 

# I L 

# o L

1- 

# l. l 

# l TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction Summary of Results Discussion of Results Sampling and Analytical Procedures Sampling Location Appendixes A - Computer Data B - Analytical Data C - Field Data Sheets D - Calibration Data E - Chain of Custody F - Protocol

List of Tables and Graphs Table 1 Summary of Results Graph 1 Summary of Results Table 2 Chrome Sampling Data 

### 1 1 

### 4 5 6

7

2 2 

### 3 

# ..

# r 

# r [ 

# r [ [

m 

# o [ [ 

# I [j 

# o L 

# l L 

# I INTRODUCTION 

### Emissions Test Report Huntington Plating, Inc. Chrome Scrubber Stack Huntington, West Virginia TI-1162

Emission testing was conducted at Huntington Plating, Inc., located in Huntington, West Virginia, on October 6,2005, by TEST, Incorporated, Charleston, West Virginia, under the direction of Mike Blake. The purpose of these tests was to detennine the concentration of total chrome being emitted into the atmosphere via the Chrome Scrubber Stack. Tom Houvouras of Huntington Plating, Inc. coordinated the testing with plant operations.

The testing followed the procedures in the Appendix to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 60, Methods 1,2, 3A, 4, and 306.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The following tables and graph provide results for the emission rates measured on the Chrome Scrubber Stack. The emission results are presented in milligrams per dry 

### standard cubic meter (mgldscm) and pounds per hour (1bs/hr).

1

# SUMMARY OF RESULTS Chrome Scrubber Stack**T~'ble** 

### 1 

### Graph 1 Total Chrome 6.00E-04 Run Emissions 

## Number Cgr/dsct} 

### (lbs!lu) 

### 1:' 

### 1 < 0.0059 <2.97B-04

# ~ 5.00E-04 

## e 

# g ·2. < 0.0057 <2.8$04 

# J 4.00£-04 I» 

## 1 < 0.0059 <2.28J!-04·

### ~ 

# . . .... a
:. Average < 

## O;OOSs. <2.93&04' 

# ! 3.00E-04

### ~
2.00E-04 1 

### 2 

### 3 Average Run Number



## ..

# r r I. 

# r r [ 

# o o [ 

# I

. I U 

# o L l 

# I I 

# l SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Ruu Date



### Dioxide Cone . - % 

### Vol.**.** 

### , r , 1
- 

### % Va l. 

## I Stack 

# ,- ' 

### Area of Stack - Sq. in. 

### ,Dry Gas I

- d scf 

### Volume Dry Gas
- dscm I Stack 

### , -Deg. F

, - %

# ~ 

# - ; Flow Rate

- ;np. 

### Rate - % TOtal ,r, 

### ,; , , - l'g

### ~ 

## §!! Tab le 2 Total Chrome Sampling Data Chrome Sc rubber S tack

I 1 0

-6-05 2 10-6

-05 900-1110 1

## ill!..
- 1355 0.11 0

. 11 19.10 19 .10 29 .57 2957 804 .20 804

.20 

## ...22:.38 4**93~**

2

.559 2.650 121. 10 124.50 2.5 9 2.60**~**

## ~ 'j:
,

## ~ . 

### , n, n n d(,Q
, ..2 1. 2 94.9


### < 15. 0 

### < 15

.0

## ~ < 0

.0059 

### < 0

.0057**'** n
. 

# I+-

3 3 10-6-05 1425

- 1630 0

. 11 19.10 29.5§ 804.20 89. 2540 122

. 90

1.75 

# r +- nd,Q 91.0


### < 15

.0**~** 

# .**~** 

# ,

# r" 

# I 

# r I I [ 

# o D [ 

# I: I 

# L 

# o I l 

# I •



### DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

Three tests for to tal chrome were performed on the Chrome Scrubber St;:lck. The results of the t es ts 

### appear to be 

### an accurate and valid representation of the actual emission s of the slack. Leak 

### checks
were performed on the s ampling systems to maintain the integrity of the samples and no leaks were detected. The moi s ture percentages were cons istent with the largest variation be ing 24.24 percent from the mean value of 2.31 percent. The flow rates were co nsistent wi th the largest variation 

### being 0.32 

### per cent from the mean val ue of 13452. 67 DSCFM. The isoki n etic sampling rates were wi thin the spec ified limits (90 to 110 % 

### isokinetic) with 

### the largest variation being 9.0 percent from 100 

### pen:ent.

The laboratory analyti cal results were non-detect for the three run s. Based on a minimum detectib le 

### limit of 

### 15 micrograms per liter, the average concentration of 

### t otal chrome was l ess than 0.0058 milli gram s per dry 

### standard cubic m et

er. Th e maxi mum variatio n durin g the three tes t s was equa l to 

### 1.72 percent.



### 4

# [ 

# I. 

# r r [ [ 

# o o [ [ 

# I [j 

# o

I I SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

The t e

s

tin g followed the proced u res i n t he Appe ndi x to the Code of Fe deral Regulation s, T itl e 40 , C hapter I , Pan 60, Methods 1 , 2, 3A, 4 , and 306.



### Twelve traverse points were samp l ed from each of the two ports on the Chrome Scrubber Stack f or
a ( a lai of twe nty-fo ur traverse p o ints. The manomet er was zeroed and l eak checks were perfonned 

### before each test. Leak 

### ch ecks wer e pcl fo nned on the sampling syst em s to maintai n the integri t y of th e sam ples and no leaks were detected.



### Total Chrome Three samp l e s for total chrome were co ll ect ed . The samples were laken according to EPA Method 

### 306. For each run , samples of fivc-minute duration were t aken isokincticall y from each of the twenty- four traverse points for a total sam pl i ng ti me of 120 min u tes. B lank sam ples were co ll ected 

### for each reagent u sed during sampling and a nal yzed f or contamination.
The " f r on t-h a lf' of the sampling t rai n con sist ed of a glass nozzle and a h eated stai n less gla ss probe.
The "back-h alf' of the sampling train con tained t h

e f ollowing impingers:
Imp inger

2 

### 3 4 

### Content s 0

. 1 N NaOH 0. 1 N NaO H Empty Silica Gel 

### Amount 

### 100 ml. 100 ml

400 

### g Param et

er Total Ch rome Total Chrome

M oisture Moisture Total chrom e samples were analyzed by graphi t e furnace a t omic ab sorption (GFAA) acco rding t o EPA Meth od 306 , by TEST , Inc., Poca, West Virg in ia.



### 5

### Chrome Scrubber 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • •
Traverse Percent of Inches From

Points Diameter Stack Wall I 

### 21 I 2 6.7 2 2116 3 J!.8 3 12/16 4 17.7 

### 5 11116 5 25.0 8**te** ft

. 32 ill ' . 

### 6 35.5 

### II 6/16 Port to Ups tream Distance 

# = 9 ft. 6.0 

### m . 7 64.5 

### 2010 /16 Po rt to D ownstream Distance 

# = 6 ft. 6.0 

### m . 8 75.0 24 Aren Of Stack 

# = 804.2 

### sq. inches 9 82.3 26 5116 Port to Upstream Distance 

# = 3.56 Stack Diameters 

### 10 88.2 28 4116 Po rt t o D ownstrea m Distance 

# = 2.44 Stack Diameters I J 93.3 2914116 Drawin s Not to Scale 12 97.9 31

# I[ 

# [ [ [ [ 

# C 

# g

.'

·1 ., 

# o [ 

# [ 

# I 

# o n I] 

# [ 

# L L L 

# L L •



## APPENDIXES
A - 

## Computer Data B - 

## Analytical Data C - 

## Field Data Sheets D - 

## Calibration Data 

## E - Chain of Custody 

## F - Protocol

# [ , 

# .. 

# c [ 

# c [ 

# c
m 

# E [ APPENDIX A 

# [ COMPUTER DATA 

# I [J
"'

# ~ " 

# L L L 

# L L L

# [ CALCULATION SUMMARY 

# SHEET [>LANT: Huntington Plating Chrome Scrubber Stack 

### 1162 

## UNIT: f)ROJECT#:

r

### Run Number
" 

### Date

__ Time

.... 0 = Sample time**~** 

### Pb = Barometric Pressure at Port Elevation DVm = VoL of Metered Gas

- meter cond., cal corr I..iI 

### Tm = Meter Temperature 

# 1

·Tm = Meter Temperature

r-- 

### Po = Meter Orifice Pressure

I-. 

### Pma 

### = Meter Pressure Absolute

-, Vtwet = Sampled Gas Volume Wet

I-. 

### Vtstd 

# =Sampled Gas Volume at Stand. Cond., dry 

# I Vtstd = Sampled Gas Volume at Stand. Cond.,dry

r_ 

### C02 

# =% C02, dry 

# JJ 02 = % 02, dry 

### nCO =%CO,dry 

## U N2 

# = %N2,dry (N2+CO) 

# =100-(C02+02)

-- 

### EA 

# = Excess Air



## - Vw 

# = Volume Water H2O = 

### in gas H2O = Moisture 

### in Gas at Saturation '- Md = Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas Mw = Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas

"- 

### Psg 

# = Stack Pressure, gauge - measured Psa = Stack Pressure, absolute Ts = Stack Temperature 1 10-6-05 900

- 1110 120 29.61 93.048

80.6 540.6

1.93 29.75 103.310 90.384 2.559 0.11 19.10 0.00 80.79 827.1 51.0 2.59 11.93 28.78 28.50 -0.55 29.57 121.10 2 3 10-6-05 10-6-05 1150

- 1355 1425

- 1630 120 120 29.61 29.60 97.908 94.220

89.4 91.5 549.4 551.5

1.98 1.99 29.76 29.75 107.614 102.002 93.593 89.697 2.650 2.540 0.11 0.11 19.10 19.10 0.00 0.00 80.79 80.79 827.1 827.1 53.0 34.0 2.60 1.75 13.10 12.54 28.78 28.78 28.50 28.59 -0.55 -0.55 29.57 29.56 124.50 122.90 minutes in.Hg
cu. ft Farenheit Rankine in. H20 in.HA
cu. ft cu.ft
cu. Meter 

### % % % % % I

### grams 

### % %

in. H20 in.Hg Farenheit

# r CALCULATION SUMMARY 

# SHEET**r~LANT:** Huntington Plating 

## UNIT: Chrome Scrubber Stack f'ROJECT #:. 

## 1162

r 

### Run Number**~.** 

### Ts Ts 

### f-\11l P

### ~Vs mVs 

### U As 

# Fl Qa 

### ,-Qs 

## '-IR. ""Mn



# - Cs 

# IER

- 

# L 

# o L L L L 

# L = Stack Temperature 

# = Stack Temperature 

# =

Avg. Sum. of Pressure Square Root 

# =

Velocity in the Stack 

# = Velocity in the Stack 

# =

Effective Stack Area 

# = Volumetric Flow Rate at stack condo 

# =

Volumetric Flow Rate, stand. cond., dry 

# =

Isokinetic Ratio {VnlVs)*l00 

# =

Total Chrome Concentration

= 

### Total Chrome Concentration

= 

### Total Chrome Emissions 1 2 322.50 324.39 581.1 584.5 0.774 0.773 2,769.1 2,773.7

46.15 46.20 804.2 804.2 15,465 15,490 13,528 13,469

91.2 94.9
< 15 < 15
< 0.0059 < 0.0057
< 2.97E-04 < 2.86E-04 

### 3 323.50 Kelvin 582.9 Rankine 0.766 2,740.9 

### ftImin

45.70 ft/sec 804.2 

### Lsq. in. 15,307 acfm 13,459 dscfm 

### 91.0 

### %
< 15 

## UK
< 0.0059 mg/dscm
< 2.98E-04 lbs/hr

# ·1. 

# r

'TEST, Inc.**rTO~** 

## Chrome Sampling Data

, Project #_1_16_2_____ Meter Box # 2010 O/OC02 _0._11

__ Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 %02 19.10 [ Unit/Stack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pilot Cal. (Cp) 0.84 %CO

__ _ " Operator 

### MB Nozzle # %N2 80.79



# ------- Run # 1 Nozzle Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 10.00 [ Date-I-0--6-O-5---- Stack Dia.(in.)-32-- F"mal Moist. %_2._59

__ Sample TIme 120 Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Final Isokinetic % 91.2



# ------- --- Imp. I 2 3 4 5 6 [ Minlpt 5 

### Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.61 

### Initiall..eak Rate 0.017 cfm @ Pi # 23 LeakR 0012 cfm@

lIter Leak Check Vol. Fmal ate 

# . 

# [

,-**[~** 

# I I>

- 

# ( L. 

# ,I t

J


# ,

# :
t lI. Portl Point 1-12

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2-12

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dry 

### Gas Pitot Time Meter(CF) Velocity 900 54.515 ("H20) 905 58.440 0.81 910 62.520 0.81 15 67.370 0.76 920 70.860 0.76 925 74.880 0.72 930 79.110 0.72 935 83.090 0.64 940 86.620 0.64 945 89.940 0.37 950 93.070 0.34 955 98.510 0.34 1000 99.056 0.34 1015 104.030 1.10 1020 108.180 0.76 1025 112.470 0.74 1030 115.720 0.58 1035 119.200 0.50 1040 122.810 0.50 1045 126.140 0.46 1050 129.570 0.55 1055 132.990 0.55 1100 136.710 0.57 1105 139.990 0.57 1110 143.514 0.57 Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F)

2.55 0.897 6.0 116 246 253 2.55 0.897 6.0 120 248 256 2.45 0.869 7.0 118 249 250 2.45 0.869 7.0 121 249 249 2.25 0.845 7.0 119 250 251 2.25 0.845 7.0 120 250 250 2.05 0.797 6.0 121 249 250 2.05 0.727 6.0 120 248 250 1.15 0.606 4.0 119 249 252 1.11 0.581 4.0 123 250 250 1.11 0.581 4.0 124 249 250 1.11 0.581 4.0 123 249 251 3.55 1.040 8.0 123 250 251 2.45 0.869 7.0 122 247 249 2.35 0.857 7.0 120 249 251 1.75 0.759 6.0 120 247 250 1.55 0.704 5.0 121 251 250 1.55 0.704 5.0 123 250 250 1.45 0.676 5.0 122 249 250 1.65 0.739 5.0 122 248 249 1.65 0.739 5.0 121 248 250 1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 251 1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 250 1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 250 Initial Fmal 719 718 702 721 637 

### 644 1005 1031

10 "Hg 10 

### "H 19 Imp. 

### Dry Gas Temp. Temp.

(F) 

### In Out 68 77 75 68 

### 77 75 68 77 75 68 78 75 68 78 75 68 79 76 68 79 76 68 79 76 68 81 77 67 82 77 67 82 78 66 83 78 68 81 79 68 84 80 68 84 80 68 84 80 68 85 81 68 85 82 68 86 82 68 86 82 68 87 83 67 87 83 67 88 84 67 88 84

### Example Calculations Run Number 1 Pb = 29.61 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp = 0.84 Pitot Cal Vw = 51 Water weight gain Os = 32 in. Stack Diameter 

# [ [ 

# [ Pm = 1.93 "H2O Meter pressure 

### As 

# = 804.2 Sqin. Stack Area Avg 

### 11 P = 0.613 "H2O Differential pressure On = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter Avg Sqrtl1 P = 0.774 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. Tt = 120 

### min Sample Time %C02 

### = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide %CO = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide 

# r [ %02 = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 = 80.79 Nitrogen Vm = 88.999 acf Ps 

### = -0.55 "H2O 

# [ Tm = 80.6 (F) Ts = 121.1 (F) 

# DVmstd= 17.65.vm*[Pb+ii:] Tm(R) 

# o [ Vwgas 

### = 0.0471 

## * Vw 

### = 0.0471 

## *

Bws= Vwgas Vrnstd 

### + Vwgas 93.048 (acf· Y) Dry Gas Volume 29.57 "Hg Stack Pressure 540.6 (R) Meter Temperature 581.1 (R) Stack Temperature



### [ .L2l 

# = 17.65 

## * 93.048 

## * 29.61 + 13.6 540.6

51 = 2.4021 sft 3 

# J = 90.384 sft j 1.506 scfm

Bws* 100 

# = 2.59 % Moist. Md ===28=.7=8=2= I-Bws 

## = 0.9741 MW = 28.503 

### ===== 

# L I 

# L**~lliID** Vs = 5129.4 • Cp • Ps • Mw 

## * sqrt 

### 11 P 581.1 

# o 5129.4 * 0.84 

## * \ 29.57 

## * 28.503 

## * 0.774 

## = 2,769.1 fpm ==46=.1

.... 5==fps 

# L ACFM = Vs 

## * As 144 2,769.1 * 804.2 

# = 15,465 ACFM

DSCFM= 

# L 

# L % 

### Iso. = 

# I
,- 

# I 144

ACFM 

## * 528 

## * Ps 

# * (l-Bws)

Ts (R) 

## * 29.92

1039 

## * Yrnstd * Ts CR) (I-Bws) 

## * Ps 

## * Tt 

## * Vs 

## * (Dn)1\2 1,039 

## * 90.384 0.9741 • 29.57 • 120 15,465 

## * 528 • 29.57 581.1 • 29.92 • 0.9741 

### =



## * 581.1 

### = 91.2 % 

## * 2,769.1 

## * 0.06250 13,528 DSCFM =======

# r TEST, Inc. 

# I Comments: 

### fTOtal Chrome Sampling Data

.

. Project**#~1_16;..;;2_____** Meter Box # 2010 %C020.ll



# --- Imp. Initial 

### Final Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 

# r UnitlStack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp) _0_.84

__

.. Operator_MB______ Nozzle #

__ _ %02 19.10 

### %CO



# --- %N2 80.79 1 721 727 2 705 723 3 642 649 [ Run**#~2______** Nozzle 

### Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 10.00

. Date 10-6-05 Stack Dia.(in.)-32-- Fmal Moist. %_2._60

__ 4 1031 1053 5 Sample Tnne_l_20

______Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Fmal Isokinetic % 94.9 .-.....;-- 6 

# C Minlpt 5 Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.61 Fil # 29 Leak Ch k V 1 ter ec o. m ate c 19 

### Initial Leak 

### Rate 0.018 cfm @

p' alLeakR 0017 fm@ 15 "Hg 15 

### "H 

# ( Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter hnp. 

### Dry Gas Portl 

### Tune Meter(CF) Velocity Press. Rate 

### Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. 

### Temp. Point 1150 45.616 ("H20) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) 

### In Out 2-12 1155 51.330 0.93 2.85 0.942 6.0 124 248 244 68 87 85

, 11 1200 54.250 0.93 2.85 0.942 6.0 124 249 256 68 

### 88 86 

# r 10 1205 58.070 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 125 249 252 68 88 86 9 1210 61.900 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 124 249 250 68 89 86 8 1215 65.720 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 124 249 249 68 90 87 

# t· 7 1220 69.320 0.50 1.65 0.721 6.0 124 249 250 67 91 87 6 1225 73.140 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 87 

# It 5 1230 76.660 0.48 1.55 0.706 6.0 125 249 251 67 91 87 4 1235 80.190 0.48 1.55 0.706 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 87 

# r; 3 1240 84.000 050 1.65 0.763 6.0 126 249 250 67 92 87 2 1245 87.800 0.50 1.65 0.763 6.0 125 249 250 66 92 88 1 1250 91.460 0.50 1.65 0.763 6.0 124 250 250 66 92 88 

# G 1-12 1300 95.970 0.78 2.60 0.900 7.0 126 246 250 68 91 88 11 1305 100.420 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 125 249 250 68 91 88 

# I: 10 1310 104.860 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 125 250 250 67 91 89 9 1315 107.920 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 124 249 249 67 91 89 

# ,I 8 1320 112.720 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 248 250 67 91 89 

# 1\ 7 1325 116.850 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 89 6 1330 120.930 0.66 2.21 0.818 6.0 124 250 250 67 91 89 5 1335 124.650 0.53 1.70 0.742 6.0 124 250 250 67 92 89 4 1340 128.360 0.53 1.70 0.742 6.0 124 252 250 67 92 90 I 3 1345 132.340 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 252 250 68 93 90 

# l.. 2 1350 135.720 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 251 250 68 93 90



# I 1 1355 139.263 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 251 250 68 92 90

# r Example Calculations 

# r Run Number 2 

# Ph = 29.61 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp 

# = 0.84 Pitot Cal 

# r Vw 

# = 53 Water weight gain Ds 

# = 32 in. Stack Diameter Pm 

### = 1.98 "H2O Meter pressure As 

# = 804.2 Sqin. Stack 

### Area Avg l!. P 

### = 0.606 "H2O Differential pressure Dn 

# = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter 

# r Avg Sqrtl!. P 

### = 0.773 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. 

### Tt 

### = 120 min Sample Time %CO2 

# = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide %CO 

# = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide %02 

### = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 

### = 80.79 Nitrogen 

# [ Vm 

# = 93.647 acf 97.908 (acf* Y) Dry Gas Volume Ps 

# = -0.55 "H2O 29.57 "Hg Stack Pressure Tm 

# = 89.4 (F) 549.4 (R) Meter Temperature 

# [ Ts 

# = 124.5 (F) 584.5 (R) Stack Temperature 

# o Vmstd = 17.65 * Vm * 

# [Ph +

# I~J Tm(R) 

# =17.65 * 97.908 *[ 29.61 

### +

# ~

. 549.4 

### ] = 93.593 sft j 1.560 scfrn 

# o [ Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw 

### = 

# [ 

# I [j Bws 

### = Vwgas Vmstd 

### + Vwgas

Vs 

### = 5129.4 * 0.0471 *

Ts(R) Ps*Mw 53 

### = 2.4963 sft 3

Bws*100 

# = 2.60 % Moist. Md 

# = 28.782 

# ==== ===== I-Bws 

### = 0.9740 MW 

# = 28.502 

# ==== =====

* sqrt l!. P 

# o 5129.4 * 0.84 

# I 584.5 

## * \ -2-9.-57...;;..;...;....;.*-2-8-.5-02-* 0.773 

## = 2,773.7 fpm 46.2 fps 

## ===== 

# L ACFM= Vs 

## * As 144 2,773.7 

## * 804.2 

# = 15,490 ACFM

DSCFM= 

# L L % 

### Iso. 

# = 

# L ! 144

ACFM 

## * 528 * Ps 

# * (l-Bws)

Ts (R) * 29.92

1039 

# * Vmstd 

## * Ts 

### cru (l-Bws) * Ps * 

### Tt * Vs 

## * (On)"2 1,039 

# * 93.593 0.9740 * 29.57 * 120 15,490 

## * 528 

## * 29.57 * 0.9740 

# = 13,469 DSCFM 

## ======= 584.5 

## * 29.92

* 584.5 

# = 94.9 % * 2,773.7 * 0.06250

# [TEST, Inc. 

# I Comments: 

### [Total Chrome Sampling Data

.
-. Project #_1_16_2_____ Meter Box # 2010 'foC020.11



# --- hnp. 

### Initial Final Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 

# r UnitlStack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp)...;.,0

. ...;.,84

__**Operator~MB=-_____** Nozzle #

__ _ [ Run # 3 Nozzle Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 5.00**~------** 

# --- ---

. Date 10-6-05 Stack Dia.(in.) 32 Final Moist. %_1._75

__ %02 19.10 %CO



# --- %N2 80.79 1 725 727 2 708 717 3 643 646 4 1053 1073 5 Sample**Time...;;.I.;;..20~**_____Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Final Isokinetic %91.0- 6 [ Minlpt 5 

### Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.60 Initial Leak 

### Rate 0.01 Filt # 228 Leak 

### Ch k V 

### I Fmal Leak 

### R 0 03

1 er ec o. ate c Lg cfm @ 13 "Hg



# --- fm@ 13 "H 

### Dry Gas Pitat Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter Imp. 

### Dry 

### Gas 

# ( Portl Time Meter(CF) Velocity Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp.

_. Point 1425 39.561 ("H2O) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) 

### In Out 1-12 1430 42.990 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 127 224 68 91 90 ! 11 1435 47.290 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 125 256 68 92 90 

# r 10 1440 51.080 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 126 250 68 93 91 9 1445 53.980 0.70 2.52 0.853 5.0, 126 251 68 93 91 8 1450 58.250 0.70 2.52 0.853 6.0 125 250 68 93 90

# r~ 7 1455 61.890 0.70 2.52 0.853 6.0 126 250 68 93 90 6 1500 66.030 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 250 68 93 90 

# I 5 1505 70.150 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 251 68 93 90 4 1510 74.010 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 95 250 68 93 90 

# I' 3 1515 78.070 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 97 249 68 93 91 2 1520 82.110 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 126 250 68 93 91 1 1525 85.623 0.44 1.45 0.676 5.0 118 250 68 93 91 

# L 2-12 1535 89.770 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 126 251 68 93 91 11 1540 93.910 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 248 68 93 91 10 1545 98.000 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 126 250 68 92 91 9 1550 102.140 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 250 68 93 91 

# II 8 1555 105.590 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 124 249 68 92 91 7 1600 109.040 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 125 250 68 92 91 6 1605 112.500 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 127 250 68 92 90 5 1610 115.960 0.46 1.55 0.691 6.0 127 250 68 92 90 4 1615 119.410 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 127 250 68 92 90 I 3 1620 122.840 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 126 249 68 92 90 

# L 2 1625 126.260 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 126 250 68 92 90



# I 1 1630 129.681 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 127 250 68 91 90 

# l

# l.**[~** Example Calculations Run Number 3 Ph 

# = 29.60 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp 

# = 0.84 Pitot Cal 

# l. Vw 

# = 34 Water weight gain Ds 

# = 32 in. Stack Diameter Pm 

# = 1.99 "H2O Meter pressure As 

# = 804.2 Sqin. Stack 

### Area Avg Il P 

# = 0.593 "H2O Differential pressure On 

# = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter 

# [ AvgSqrtll P 

# = 0.766 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. 

## n 

# = 120 ID1D Sample Time o/oC02 

# = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide 

### %CO 

# = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide %02 

# = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 

# = 80.79 Nitrogen 

# [ Vm 

# = 90.12 acf 94.22 (acf* Y) DIy Gas Volume Ps 

# = -0.55 "H2O 29.56 "Hg Stack Pressure Tm 

# = 91.5 (F) 551.5 (R) Meter Temperature 

# [ Ts 

# = 122.9 (F) 582.9 (R) Stack Temperature 

# 0 Vmstd 

### = 17.65' Vm -[ Ph 

### +

# 1~

# J 

# .[ .L22 

# ]=

'- 

# =17.65 * 94.220 29.60 

### + 13.6 89.697 sft 'j Tm(R) 551.5 1.495 scfm 

# Q 

# r' Vwgas 

# =0.0471 * Vw 

# = 0.0471 * 34 

# = 1.6014 sft 3 

# L 

# I L 

# o Bws= Vwgas Bws*100 = 1.75 % Moist. Md 

# = 28.782 Vmstd 

### + Vwgas I-Bws 

### = 0.9825 

### MW 

# = 28.593
TsCR) Vs= 5129.4*Cp* Ps*Mw 

## * sqrt Il P 582.9 5129.4 

## * 0.84 

## * \ 29.56 

## * 28.593 * 0.766 

# = 2,740.9 fpm ==4=5.=7==fps 

# L ACFM= Vs* As 144 2,740.9 

## * 804.2 

### = 15,307 ACFM 144 

# l
DSCFM 

# = ACFM 

## * 528 * Ps 

## * (l-Bws) 

# ! Ts (R) * 29.92 15,307 • 528 * 29.56 • 0.9825 

# = 582.9 

## * 29.92 

# l. % Iso. 

### = 1039 * Vrnstd * Ts CR) (l-Bws) * Ps 

## * 

## n· Vs * (Dn)A2 1,039 

## * 89.697 • 582.9 = 91.0 % -0-.-98-2-5---·---2-9-.5-6---·---1-2-0---*--2-,7-40-.9--·--0-.0-6-25-0- 13,459 DSCFM

# ·r 

# r r 

# r r [ 

# D 

# o [ [ 

# I L D L L
I

# t. 

# l EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS TOTAL CHROME

lbslhr= 

## mg Vmstd X

__ 

### I...i;g;:...r_ x DSCFM x 64.8 

### mg

DSCFM* = Stack Flow Rate 60 

### min Ihr

Vmstd* = Volwne ofdry gas sampled at standard conditions dry standard cubic feet

* 29.92 "Hg, 68 degrees F (760 mmHg, 20 degrees C) 

### lib 

## x--- 7,000 gr

# [ 

# [ [ 

# [ [ 

# C
1m 

## biI 

# D [ [ 

# I L**~** 

# [ 

# L L 

# L L l. , . 

# .

APPENDIXB ANALYTICAL DATA

# l. 

# t. 

# r [ 

# o Q [ 

# L 

# I L 

# o

I I. 

# l .:. TEST. Inc. Route 2, Box 33-B Poca, 'IN 25159 (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax

Laboratory Analysis Report TI I 1162 HUNTINGTON PLATING. HUNTINGTON. W. V. EPA KETHOD 306

- CHROHIUH EMISSIONS RUN #1 (IHPINGER COL. VOL.- 500ml) Sampled by TI/HB Laboratory Number TIB9729 Date Sampled 10/06/05 Date Received 10/10/05

ANALYSIS FoR REQUESTED**P~S** ALL RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS
PARAMETER RESULT HDL UNITS METHOD Respectfully

# ;Z'~ R122905 0841

ANALYZED DATEITIKEIANALYST Chromium (Total) NO 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:45 RJE

NO**~** Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) REF: USEPA: Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste:SW846 3rd Ed.:Nov.1986. REF: USEPA Method 306

. Determination Of Chromium Emissions Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile Labratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# r



# r [ [ 

# o [ 

# L I 

# L 

# o**~ ~.~**  TEST, Inc. Route 2, Box 33-B Poca. WV 25159 (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax

Laboratory Analysis Report TI/1162 HUNTINGTON PLATING. HUNTINGTON. W.V. EPA METHOD 306

- CHROHIUYH EMISSIONS RUN 12 (IHPINGER COL. VOL.- 500HL) Sampled by TI/HB Laboratory Number TIB9730 Date Sampled 10/06/05 Date Received 10/10/05

ANALYSIS FOR REQUESTED PARAMETERS ALL RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS
RESULT MOL UNITS METHOD Respectfully Submitted:

# ~~ R122905 0842

ANALYZED DATEITIMEIANALYST Chromium (Total) ND 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:50 RJE

NO Q Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) REF: USEPA; Test Methods 

### For Evaluating Solid Waste;SW846 3rd Ed.;Nov.1986. REF: USEPA Method 306

- Determination Of Chromium Emissions
Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile Labratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# r. 1. 

# r [ 

# [ [ 

# o 

# o [ [ 

# I L 

# o L L



# L**~ ~**  •• TEST. Inc. Route 2. Box 33-B Poca. WV 25159 (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax

Laboratory Analysis Report 'TI/1162 HUNTINGTON PLATING, HUNTINGTON, W. V . EPA HElHOO 306

- CHROHIUH EMISSIONS RUN #3 (IHPINGER Cal. VOL.

- 500Ml) Sampled by TI/MB laboratory Number TIB9731 Date Sampled 10/06/05 Date Received 10/10/05

ANAlYSIS FOR REQUESTED PARAHETERS All RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS
PARAMETER RESULT HDl UNITS METHOD Respectfully Submitted:

# ~~ Rl22905 0842

ANAlYZED DATEITlKEIANAlYST Chromium (Total) NO 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:55 RJE

NO D Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) REF: USEPA: Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste:SW846 3rd Ed.:Nov,1986. REF: USEPA Method 306

- Determination Of Chromium Emissions
Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile labratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# [ [ [ 

# [ [ 

# c m :l 

# 0 [ APPENDIXC 

# [ FIEID DATA SHEETS 

# I Q**~** 

# L L 

# L L 

# L l

# -. Pllter 1# 

### 0 

## l-J Leak Chock Vol.

# ~**I~fjqo.. p~~**  

## Orlftao

.'9rtI Tim•. Metor(CP} 

### Velocity 

# p,.,. 'omt**I~ t,c~**  

### It:rt 

### 'MOO) (!1I2.0\

# ~, I I 

# - It 

## ctr 5""6', 

# If., , •**~I 2..,!i'~-**  

### ,t- 

# '.0
, z.., oJ'L.

. Itt , 

### 'z .j;j

# I It> 

### 1';- "7.>./' ,,7(' :/,

... "f

... - 

# I ttl 

### 20 "lo,T" , 7t. 'l., T.>-: 

# 1, RJ l..S 

### )'1.8-! ' • .7 t.**'l,L~** 

# C,**I~** 

# . Jet >';,11 '.r 71. L. Lt' 

# , oJ.$'**~~,()C;** It 

### y 

### oz.**,,~-** 

### J" 

## y,' SC.o (,l • £, "( 1, 

### v.;.- 

# l 

# .. T.J':'**~.),'f** 'i 

### 37 1,(:'''':"



### . ;f s·C' 'il.07 I 

### Jy (.t 

### I 

# I 2.. ;>$"**«t~.j** 

### , 1 3 "1 

### i. I.' 1 tcco
... \.., , 9f.osl, " J'I ( 

## " 00 

# e 

# ,\ 

# .'

lo- LL 

### IT 'OI(,d.J 

## , I, I .3.sS



# -

.. 

## -tr**~o** 

### tct'· , t " 7(, L.'t'r 

# [**~** , , 

### U" 

## III t. 'i)- ,·7"1 ,'t.**~** 

### y 3D' 

### oS",ll.. 

## ,sO t.7') 

# 1 1t 

### .)6 

# "cr. 1.0 ISO 

### /.J-.r ) 

## Ii" , l..1.;I-, 

# . ..)\.) 

### i.'s> 

# , ..,,6 iu.,y' , "Oft, 

## [, 7.r 1 0 

## .r**§~** 

### , ,L.l.s7 

### ',ss- 

# ",;- 'I lJ, .;,--J; , I.l L. 

### t'l •**~S-** I, C';-

. ,I

.. 

### l IIIJ6' 

# 1

. IJ'. 71'**fJ-~** I.**7~-** 

## i: 11 c>6"' IJf

.. 

### t1 'I.**,~..,** 1.'7's 

# I' , 

## I**tI~ 1'1~**  

### • .s/¥**~;]** ',7';- 

# 1

" 

# L,

-. PlnaBAde llato· cJ # 

## Dr "L 

### P'lmp. 

## Stack Probo bt.o Vat=\lUJt1 

# '''7:'-, Temp. (oln) 

### Mfa.l 

# m .H·? 

## C' lIt 4**~,..t'** 

### ,£-o

o 0 t:. 

### , ) 10 

### , :?.,.;.

, -s--( 'I. .) 

### ''JIT 'l.. 'r1 ,;(,1 

## ',.., I 1., 21'J 

### Ii"

## s- '7 

### 1117 lSt>**.~'rS** ? ''l.C**~ ~"**  

# .7' .., t. '" 1..( , 1 

## yr ("71 , 

# " It () 2'U**,'(./~** , 

### 'I 

# I, 't 

### '**'t"'~ .s-~I**  

### 'if 0 ;' 

### \.). , "$t.' ,Srf 'f /1. "1 2.."1**~** .J ,1 '-t t 1..) l'rf


### i.elf 

## G I**~.l** 

### Uo 0,**~5t'** 

### 1 Il.

### -L 

# "t.., ,"I



### . 

# :li-'1 

# ., 11.0 l..."**.7j~** 

## 6 "1.0 2..'(7
• ")041 j- 11.f 2.,jl

t 

## ,,:0( S rt..,l 2.YC 

### ,01**~-** 12.1..' l. )' 

### f

, 1J1 

### ,S- ' " 1.\.**~"'f** I 7J'i S- I'l..l 

## ·t., b- ",J-1.. S- ,**1..~** 

## tt, "Z7 I • ,,)SL r i 1.1 

# " (75 l. $- il..J**l..£f~**

# ~'~::**,~** Imp. ....nltlal Finnl



## t' o'/f'1 )/1'

0 

### 2. ' )0 t;,'**.~'l...(** 

### 3 'J"7 ,fie{ 

### 4 I

## oOs- ,o:¥'\ 

### S 6' 

## din**~ -,-()-~'H-8-0-0** 

### ....

- oftn@ Ii>. 

### -Hg 

## - 

## 'Utcr Imp. 

## DryO.aa 

# Temp.**T~p.'** 

### Xemp.

(F)., (P) 

## In Oqt lsl**,'~J** ?'> 

### >,r**z~,,·** 

### (.J: 

### 17 ).J '**'l~-Gl** 

### ' ,'h >" 7:l-**~.,.v** 

# '''' >01-**~- t~-,**  

### c:J- '1,**>~- ~St'** **,~** )of 

### .,C' 2J(' 

### . t'z, , 

# '" 7(,**'..,~** c,' 'b '71 >( 'Z:il {b' 0,., 0'1> 0 'ls

### c.' 

### ,'? fl.**~~** :lsc' C'> I-t. "}J- "l..J , 

# " rJ '7J.**1.~,** ,'S of, 

### >f

1**y~** C'S- o 

### 5-., 

# '"' t,Y( 

### f.b J't 

## ro 'l.yo**l~** 

### ".., .Tt'**l~'O ,~**  

## !a'I .f-/**~.)c** ' 

## a Is oft l J'C:

### "~ ;..( It}. l,.'r 1 

### (6 5( .it 1.J(I 

### ,'b $0) I-J "U I (7 ,f) f-J

" ' '\. J (I , 7 41- fo"

lJ(: 

### f, $".t- Iy
.' t.
' \

.. 0

### CoiMlOPt.t: f, Oz..C

-**~c:'.** I.O'\? -"';' ,



### - 

### Pllter II' 

## Leak Check Vol. Plnal'Leak bto**-o~J** 7 otln@ 

### _. 2..1 1$- , 

## ·Hg 

# - 

# L DryOas "tot 

## Otlftoo Pump'**S~** 

## Probo I'llto&' I",p.**Dl'fQ~** 

### "trtI Tlmo**'M~r(CP)** 

## VolOcity 

# ti

..... Rate Vao\lum 

## ''feJnP. Temp. 

# Temp, Temp· ' 3'emp. 

## Nat IiS'O 

# '15:," O{ '("H2O)



### .(!'mOl (oln) 

## Mfa.) 

# m. (p) 

# m' 

# m In Ovt**~** 

### 'i.- , 

## st
.. )l ' 

# . 

# " }'l.,'f 

## • It..**~~ ,~J**  '"LJ-.r**'~'1L** '2.'f-t 

### 2.Y.,**~8** 5"';> 3S i " tt 

## I L

### 90 Sy. 

## t.r , 

## ..en**'l.,~;** • ),'Y**~** t. " 

### 11/1**'l."~** 1.)-& 

# ,'if 6-1- 

# 6-,
I' 

### to os 

## :s IF ,(,-", ' ,S' " (,I'S- 

# ,?, l, " '('#-r '2.-r:f 'ZSL , i.& 

### 6-,. 

## J, 

# , 10 (.(.50 

## ,s,**I.~.)** , l)(

## >. 

# ," P·T**~'r** 1 ,"l$Q (;8 ' 

### 51**~c** 

# r i- 

### tS.7L 

# ' .5" .. /.11 ;-**~)t** l " , Vf" 1. 

### :'-1 

## ,&'

. It" 'Z. ., 'i 

# -to ;) 

# f 

# , 1.0 (.1.ll.

### ~ib IJjS'**~"'r..(** 

## t It., l..,ct 

### UQ 

# "**~( g:-~**  I£.., 4**l.~,** 

### ..,J.I'{ 

## .5Ca**'I.~.r** I Jt.) (. I l.j" 't.,**~** , tso , Co 7 , C;/, ;) 

# . 

# t ,- ,)0 

# ..". ,<.
, V/; ( ':;5:' t )o( " 

## t\.r l. Y'i**2.~** ; 

### ''7 1'1 3-')**~** '# :1';-**sc~** 

## it, ,tiB , ,,s,J-: 1)0'" 

### C

.**2.'r~** '2,J"'O - I t;- C " 

### '11 )"} ;l 'f0 

## H.eo • .$c I. , .;- • 'C) l 

### ,z. \. ' 'l.'I f lSV (-; 

### crt**'~?** 

# I l. yr 

### s-7./sCJ ,.:) (; (.(j- ,1( J 

# ,**IL~** 1.'1f '**'l.~** 

### ({**<)'~** i-f I 

### .s-c , <i I, 'iLO**;~-** 

# " ... .1(..3 

### l I L 'f '\.$'- 

### Ie 11. 

### 5t**'o(~** l.a"u 

# r. I
- It**;,-~** Il.. (1 00**9S.~** )


### . .,y l,C
, '1'()(.! 

### ? r1{. 

### 1.",'**~.s-c** 

### '8 'it**~** 

# 1 Ii 

## or**~OO,** It l. 

# .](,**"l..~r ~Iki';**  

## 7 I**"\..~- 2..~**  c; "l,$o Gf. 'l( 

### 8e,

# ~ iO ,0**/(1f.~'** 'ill '1.. j :;- 

## ·.li'i 7 ( 1..)- LSO**,,~.~** C'? 91 

# 'b' cr
. 

# . - fb), ,. t.. 

### ,7t 

# . ,t.;r 

### ,Hl " t 

### 1.J 1111**~'f'i** (.' '7 ell l-1**I~**

# r~ S- l() flL 7 L. J(.C 

## z. L I ,b'lY 

### G 11.Y 1..'18 

### "Zso 

# ,) 

## rr-I .f'; '1 

# 1" ili,.fI"**i~{.** 

### i.l.t**."'~** 

# , i'LV ,'f 

### 1 1.JC'-**,~** 'PI 

### n

" JO 

### (to.e;) , ' (. (.

, :t,.tI ,Jtb' 

### i. ,;t5 ' l..lO 

### ue**,~** t;1 

### It 

# t ' l ' S J

..; , It; •

# f.> ',;) to "} ,7'tL (, 11'1 Z:;Hi 

### U,·**~7** '7L 

# :--i 't, 'f 'tfJ, IU' 

### ,.It .S3 " 7 

### ,,"It... t II Y tyt 'l.P 

# t7 1l '10 " \ ..) Ill.,**~t{** , 

# ,tt 

# l ' 't- I,S ,(. 

# ., 

# ,**,~** , I 

### If\ \ on, , !jV**c..~** 

### 'i! 

# c;" oJ l.. oSf1 IJS'. 

### 'n 

## .1L (,) "**~I** 

### S' : " " 

## 'S- 'I. It ., )) ( 'ljli 

### Cfl fc 

# \' 

# ,**~J'** 

### {lit

... ,; '(( 

### {oj 

### .,Itt_ 

## - )1.'1 'til .J 

### 130 i./i 

### 'iL 

# ,0 [ .' 

## '. ,to 

# t. ' \

, '
"

- .....**~4~"-....!.**

# "'ter tI 'l.'1 T 

## Leak 

## chock Vol. Plnal·LeakRato·**o"c>.~** 

## .@ J,(. 

### -Hg 

# - -.**~'** DI')' 

# aa.**PtfO~** 

## Odftao

. Pump' 

### S

.. 

## Probl PI.ltor Imp

.**DryO~** 

# .,., TIm.**·M~r.(CP)** 

### . Vo1oolty 

# ,,.,, Rat.o**Va~\lum** 

### . 'l)fnp: 

### Temp. 

# Temp. Temp

.. 

## remp .

.... 

## blllt J't't,>. :J',s(.( 

## .MOO) ·r.mO) (oAn) 

## Mfa.} (ft' (P) (F). (P) 

## In (Nt**~** 

## . /- tL .)0 '{2,11 (7/ 

### Z.;S';- ,1;1 S ,S"

. /1,7 

## • 

# - 2-'LV (tf "1 

### '10 It 

### J.1" "1',7..'7 

# ,." 'l. ,jf'" ;hi' oS- J1S 

# - zSG. (8 91. 

# ·'0 '. 10 

### .,0**·~,.o!** 

## , ..

# " : 'l..c

..;-,J- l'U' <; . r- & ·I.'"}. , 

# - ·z..so \ 

## '5 'I) 'il 

## -1 'j 

### VI sl**~~** ,"10 

### z
..rl

.. ,5'..f".J**.~** ..... 

### il.' 

# - ?Sf**(~** 

## 'J r, 

# r. So 58.1,..\ .,**~}S"** .) 

# ,.

.**~"")O** '2. ';-'l.. 

# , n.S 

# - LSO (S 'l 

### '0 

# f" ')**~-~-** , ,.**~** Cj '.10 1.**~:""L** , lJi,' ) 

# , I""L'

. 

# -**2.~O** 

### (.8 7.1 

## '0**~** 

# , ISoC (,(,.0.1 

## Itt '1.. 1. f**I~l~** 

# , t1....r 

# -**~so** . 'lJ f) 

# '"" 

# , S**o~-** 70.1s.- 

### .tt, 

## ·z. t t .ttf**~** i"'2.. ., 

# - 2S'-**~6** 

### '1J 

## to v 10 

### 7JI,ol ',(;0**I,~S.** 

### ,)'6 C· 

## 9s 

# - ·l..So 

# 'Ei 

# '1 90 ;l (S 13",07 

# .. '0

. /.jr I '7 'i 0 

# , '1) 

# -**z..1f~ ~t,**  9J ?I 

# It L L",.., 8'L, II 

# .. '0 t t,r 

# .

# ').,' 

# , h.t 

# - 2.SC' 

# '" "..l ."
f t-**~'c;l,l** • 'tV 

### It '{oS


### . L)l 

# - it**~** 

# - t$(i 

## ,s 'i'J 

### ;t**~** .**~** IS .10**~** .

# ,. .-**~** 

# -

- 

# ... 

# .. ". 

# .. ['i 2

- It.**~j- ~.77**  

# ,'t '2.1. I 

### .rlr 

## 6 11.£ 

# - 'l.S1 (",b .,.) 

# "

.. /1 4'0 

### '1.!.{ ( 

## , it 'l.l..I i-'4L t 1.1' ( I). 'f 

# - 2.,(6'"

. (6-**~J** ';,

# ~ .. 

# .ll t

10 v'; 

# cr.r: "0 

# .. (. '2, l. ( 

# " /1.(. 

# - 2. :;-c.' 

# 'f 5'1. "il

.. ''1 (?.J--**,~ ~J**  

## v, ..;el loL.Jy ,l. Co 

# . ·l. l { .pt b 

# - I j" 

# , & S,.i·-**loS',~** ,Y(**i.;~** 

### :lH ,...**Il.~** 

# -**~ 'f~** **~b** tL 9, 

# I**~** 

# , " "0 10 'i. 0'1 

### ., yl**I.~r** • (,**~I ~**  

## n.s 

# -**~sc** 

### 'f 7t 'i, ( oj 

### In

... ..>'' ., 

# ,1'

. ,0 5 

### :> 

# i' 'fI**~** iZ."] 

# - nO 

## 'E 1i. 'il 

# t
. .s 1<:- • 15. 

# '7'

. . , ., I- 

### J 1 .i) ,(.'r( 

### . t 117 

# - £5" 

## '6 9l 1'() 

### t·· 

## v. t.,)

.... 

### ; b't. '{ 

# r ,'f$ ;, 'iJ

.**,(.~'t** I.,. )11 

## - "2SC

.**(~** 'It. "ii:J 

# 1'·

. \ .J 20 U.,fy"

. 

### .1'> (, y; .( 

## .. .\ '( 

## .c.. It '\ 

### v,t 

## ,& C)1. 

## 'io I '. 

# -

- I·

. L 

# : ;"2' lS0

. 'L l.J-·**~tL.t.L** L'1J 

# ,,- ".J- ,t.J-( 

# , - 'h 91 fCJ 

# II ! I .10 1.**~.** 

### llrt ;Y3 f' '1'

### i" • (.6 'f 

# , 'L 7 

# - l.se.' 

## '8 'II 

# 'i,. l " " " -t, 

# 1 ;.. .\
'0

# [ [ 

# [ [ [ [**~** 

# m 

# [ 

# [ 

# I**~** 

# m [ 

# [ 

# L 

# L L L , 

# ..**~** • 1



### APPENDIXD 

### CALIBRATION DATA

# r
ro 

# [ 

# r r [ 

# o Q 

# r: L I 

# L 

# o I 

# l 

# t

1**,~** 

### Barometer 29.59 Test Y 1.0515 

## Dry Gas Meter Box Calibration Meter No. 2010



### Vw 

## Tw Date Calibrator Vd Td 

## OF

Average Y 

# = 1.0455

# r [ 

# r 

# r r. [: 

# o o [ 

# L 

# I L 

# o L L L l Barometer 29.4 PreTest Y 

### 1.0455 Po Vac 

## Dry 

## Gas Meter Box Calibration Meter No. 2010 Date Calibrator Vw Tw Vd csm Td 

### Y 

## OF 78 77 77.5

77

Average Y= 1.0293

# ·[ ,. . 

# [ [ 

# [ [ 

# c**~ ~** **~-** 

# .[



# [ APPENDIXE CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

# I**~** i"

# ~ 

# [ 

# L 

# L L 

# L 

# Ir-:--"1 r----: . .-. r----1' ,--, .**~ ~** **~** 'L...**~** t I , , l -....:**~** ./ ..:-- 

# CHAIN OF CUSTODY.'

.' ':.**~,'** 

# i CLIENT 

### NAME: 

## t-l v I\\\.( Nl-\.l".

.**<p/~** 1\(i 

### REQUESTED ANALYSIS 

## COMMENTS

,



### , PROJECf NAME: PROJECI' LOCATION:**"'lIl\~,o\ct-b",** c..#

# ~ PROJECT CONTACT: 

# i PROJECf PHONE:**~** 

### PROJECT**~GER: ~**  

### PROJECT NUMBER: 11(;'L.

# ~ 

# 2 

# i**~i** J 

# i \

# ~

# ~**~ ~.**  SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

# ~8**~** 

### (INCLUDE 

### MATRIX)

## ~ . 

### Z 0 

### I I ;0

.. 

## i. 

# / 

# , J**-rt~7'12(j** 

## . 

# 5 1 

### ::r""p 'Aloet c", 

## i"",*,,,..,. '1.. 't, 'iO- 

### L 

## I ) 

# ?t-i!l} 730 C,)**I"""p.~cr <:";I,.,;.,,,,&:.-\~.**  

# - I**~** 

### / 

# IJ F= 3 3 

## le-'**~-gt;731** 

## z • ]; ,...,l'o

.... _ Co. II

............**~** 

# 031Lt«(O, ''''**N~()#-)** . 

# Iv -'}1;-

## £" '7

## g:J-, Q 

# -**~** ,**~**

...:I**~** 

# ::s <**~**

RELINQtJJSBED BY 

## > DATE TIME REqIVEDBY , DATE TDd£ RECElVEDAT' 1ltAl\J)**~&=** Q 

# _1kL fk.se. 1{)--7

# ~&£ 

# lto/t4Jk**~** 

# , (fJ RELINQtJJSBED BY DAlE TIldE BECElVEDBY DATE TDd£ NAMEOFlABOV.nnvro Q ·0



# .

# .[ 

# [ [ [ [ 

# [**~ ~**  

# [ 

# [ 

# I c**~** 

# 00 

# [ [ 

# L 

# L L. 

# L**.~.** 

# .

APPENDIXF 

## PROTOCOL

# r**~~** TEST. 

### Inc.

## ~ Route 2, Sox 33·S Poea, WV 25159 [ (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099' Fax**~** . www.wastelron.com

# ~ 

# l [ 

# [ 

# o C 

# l. L. 

# I L 

# o l

I I I t. 

# STACK TEST PROTOCOL HUNTINGTON PLATING, INC. CHROME PLATING STACK HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA AUGUST 25, 2005

# ~~+ • TEST, INCORPORATED Technical Environmental Services Team 

## . .. .

Route 2. Box 33-B. Poca. West Virginia 25159 Ph: (304) 755-1077 Fx: (304) 755-1099

Stack Sampling and Analysis

- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# co. Tur, 

# ;nco**~** Route 2, Box 33·8 Poca, WV 25159 [ (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax

_. www.wastetron.com



# Table ofContents Statement ofVerification Stack Test Protocol Summary Introduction Description ofProcess Variances/Exemptions Sampling and Analytical Procedures Sampling Location Safety Example Calculations and Data Sheets Equipment Calibration Attachment 1 Attachment 2

Staek Sampling and Analysis
- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# [ 

# [ [ 

# D 

# o [ [ 

# I 

# L 

# o L L L 

# L TEST, 

### Inc. Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 fax www.wastetron.com 

# Statement ofVerification • '1 •



### I hereby affinn that to the best ofmy knowledge all State and Federal regulations applicable to each source to be tested have been reviewed, and all testing requirements therein have been incorporated into the test plan and that all information provided will not be falsified_

# 7l~-.~ Paul Chinuntdet Director ofTesting

Stack Sampling and Analysis

- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis -,

# I-~.**~.I;"'. ~**  Route 2. Box 33·8 Poea. WV 25159 

# r (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax 

## I

. www.wastetron.eom

# ~ 

# r [ STACK TEST PROTOCOL SUMMARY 

# [ 

# o 

# o [ 

# r' I 

# L 

# o L 1
t 

# t ! 

# I. I. 

### Source Information: A.Name: B. Address: C. Person to Contact: D. Title: 

### E. Telephone: 

### E. Name of Source: 

### F. Permit Number: 

### O. Plant Identification Number: 

## n. Testing 

### Firm Information: A.Name: B. Address: 

### C. Person to Contact: D. Telephone: 

### ITI. Tentative Test Date: A. Date: 

### B. Time: IV. 

### Sampling Information A. Pollutants to be sampled: B. 

### EPA Methods: C. Number ofsample runs: D. Number ofsample points: E. Minimum Sample Time: F. Minimum Sample Volume: V. Sampling Location: A. Stack height: B. Inside diameter: C. Sampling ports height above ground: D. Port to upstream distance: E. Port to downstream distance:

Stack Sampling and AnalYSis

- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 

### Huntington Plating, Inc. 625 Monroe Avenue Huntington, West Virginia 25704 Tom Houvouras President (304) 522-0381 Chrome Plating Stack

TEST, Inc. Route 

### 2, Box 33-B, Poca, West Virginia, 25159 Paul Chinuntdet, Director ofTesting (304) 755-1077

October 6, 2005 8:00-18:00

Total Chrome 1,2, 3A, 4, and 306 3 per method To be detennined on-site 120 minutes 60 dscf

25 feet 32 inches 10 feet 9 feet 6 inches 6 feet 6 inches

# 1 [ 

# [ 

# o 

# o [ 

# r I L 

# o TEST, Inc. Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax www.wastetron.com

JNTRODI TCTJON 

## Stack Test Protocol Huntington Plating, Inc. Huntington, West Virginia Chrome Plating Stack t ., •



### Stack emission testing is to be performed at Huntington Platin& Inc. located 

### in Huntington, West Virginia, by TEST, Incorporated, ofCharleston, West Virginia. Huntington Platin& Inc. recently updated the emissions control system with a new composite mesh pad system. The purpose of the testing is to provide emissions data to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N and the West Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Protection, Division of

### Air Quality. The testing will be performed according to EPA Method 306 to detennine the concentrations oftotal chrome being emitted into the atmosphere via the Chrome Plating Stack.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS 

### Huntington Platin& Inc. owns and operates four hard chrome-electroplating tanks that had an 

### initial startup date December 16, 1993. Each chrome tank is used to plate rods and cylinders. The emissions from the tanks are collected in composite mesh pad scrubbers located above each 

### tank
REQI JESTED VARIANCES/EXEMPTIONS 

### There are no requests for variances to the proposed methods.

Stack Sampling and Analysis

- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and AnalySis

# r [ 

# [ 

# o**~** 

# L [ 

# I L 

# o

" L 

# L 

# I TEST, Inc. Route 2, Box 33·8 Poca, WV 25159 (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax www.wastetron.com

SAMPLING AND ANAlYTICAl. PROCEDURES 

### The testing 

### will follow the procedures in the Appendix to the Code ofFederal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 60, Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 306. po11ntant 

### Total Chrome Method 

### 306 MinntesfI'est 

### 120 Volume/Sample 

### 60 dscf
Leak checks will be performed on the sampling train before and after each 

### run to prevent contamination. 

### All components ofthe sampling train will be cleaned prior to each 

### run. Velocity The velocity and stack temperature will be measured according to 

### EPA Methods 1 

### and 2. 

### Twelve traverse points will be used to measure the velocity at each sampling location. A Type-S Pitot tube and oil gauge manometer will be used to measure the velocity pressure in the stack. The stack temperature will be measured using a type-K thermocouple and digital temperature indicator.
Moisture The flue gas moisture will be determined according to EPA Method 4. The moisture will be determined by measuring the "back-half' ofthe sampling train.
Total Chrome 

### The total chrome samples will be taken according to EPA Method 306. For each run, 

### samples of ten-minute duration will be taken isokinetically from each of the twelve traverse points for a total 

### sampling time of 120 minutes. The minimum sample volume will be 

### at least 60 dscf. Blank samples will be collected for each reagent used during sampling and analyzed for contamination.

The "front-half' of the sampling 

### train will consist of a glass nozzle, non-heated glass probe, and glass filter bypass.

Stack Sampling and Analysis

- Mobile Laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# r. [ 

# . r [ 

# [ [ 

# G 

# o [ 

# r I L 

# o I I TEST, Inc. Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax www.wastetron.com



### The "back-half' ofthe sampling train will contain the following impingers: Tmpjoger Contents 1 

### O.lNNaOH 2 

### O.lNNaOH 3 

### Empty 4 

### Silica Gel AmOlmt 

### 100 mI. 

### 100 

### mI. 400g parameter 

### Total Chrome Total Chrome Moisture Moisture . ., 

## .

The "front-half' ofthe sampling train will be rinsed with O.lN NaOH recovered. The ''back-half' collections ofthe sampling train (back halfoffilter holder, impinger connectors, and impinger solutions 1,2, and 3) will be measured to detennine the moisture content and rinsed and recovered using 0.1 N NaOH. The samples will be analyzed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.

SAMPI.ING lOCATION 

### See enclosed Figure

SAFETY REQIJIREMENTS 

### All personnel entering the plant must follow all rules and regulations set by Huntington Plating, Inc. General safety guidelines should be followed which includes protective eyewear, hardhat, and work boots throughout the plant and ear protection in specified areas. The protective eyewear should be either ANSI approved safety glasses or goggles. All safety concerns are inherent with an industrial environment and are not unusual or extreme.

EXAMPLE CAl CIU.ATIONS AND FIElD DATA SHEETS 

### See following enclosures

Stack Sampling and Analysis

- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis

# c ...

+

... '

............. TEST, Inc. 

# r

-. ..... Route 2, Box 33-8 Poca, WV 25' 59 (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax www.wastetron.eom 

# [, [ 

# [ 

# [ 

# o 

# o [ [ 

# I L 

# o l
t 

# l EQIIIPMENT CAT JBR ATJON



### Probe Nozzle

Pitot Tube Dry 

### Gas Meter Orifice Manometer Thermocouple

Stack Sampling and AnalysiS
- Mobile laboratory Air Toxies Sampling and AnalysiS Description 

### By

### micrometer per 

### EPA Method 5. 

### Three separate measurements using different diameters each time, and obtain the average of the measurements. Per EPA Method 2 type pitot tube construction. Default 0.84 will be used. Per EPA Method 5 using a wet 

### test meter. Five (5) point calibration before and after test. Per EPA Method 

### 2

## Chrome Scrubber**Stack-:-~_**



### Inside Diameter of Stack 

### = ft. Port to Upstream Distance 

### = 9 

### ft. Port to Downstream Distance 

### = 6 

### ft. Area Of Stack 

### = 804.2 Port to Upstream Distance 

### = 3.56 Port to Downstream Distance 

### = 2.44 Draw' s Not to 

### Scale 32 

### m. 6.0 in. 6.0 in.

sq. inches Stack Diameters Stack Diameters Traverse Points 

### 1 2 

### 3 4 

### 5 

### 6 7 8 9 

### 10 

### 11 12 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# •
Percent of Inches From Diameter Stack Wall 

### 2.1 

### 1 6.7 2 2/16 H.8 

### 312/16 17.7 

### 511/16 25.0 8 35.5 

### 11 6116 64.5 

### 2010116 75.0 24 82.3 26 5116 88.2 28 4116 93.3 

### 29 14116 97.9 

### 31

# I 

# r 

# r r [ [ 

# o Q

{ o •



### _. 

# L I L 

# o [ 

# l I
1 

# EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS TOTAL CHRO:rvm

Ibs/hr 

# = mg Vmstd X

__

### l...::igr~_ X DSCFM 

### x 64.8 mg

DSCFM* 

### = Stack Flow Rate 60 

### min Ihr

Vrnstd* 

### = Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions dry standard cubic feet



## * 29.92 "Hg, 68 degrees F (760 nun Hg, 20 degrees C) 

### lib 

## x--- 7,000 gr· ;



## T-:::'

# r

# r Example Calculations RUn Number 

### Pb = "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp 

# = Pitot Cal

# rVw 

# = gm Water weight gain Os 

# = in. Stack Dirumter Pm 

# = "H2O Meter pressure As = Sq 

### in. Stack 

### Area Avg dP = "H2O Differential pressure On 

# = m**NozzleDi~** 

# r Avg Sqrtd P 

# = "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. Tt = min SampleTm %C02 = Carbon Dioxide %CO 

### = Carbon Monoxide %02 

### = Oxygen %N2 

### = Nitrogen 

# [ Vm = acf (acf* Y) Dry Gas Volume Ps = "H2O "Hg Stack Pressure 

# [ Tm = (F) (R) Meter Temperature Ts = (F) (R) Stack Temperature 

# 0 Vrnstd= 

# 17.65 *

# Vm * 

# [Pb +

# 1~~J =

# 17.65 * 

# -[ + 13.6 

# ]= sft J Tm(R) scfm 

# 0 [ Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw = 0.0471 * = sft 3 

# [' Bws= Vwgas Bws*100 = % Moist. Md= Vmstd 

### + Vwgas I-Bws = MW= 

# I**~** Th.CRl 

# L Vs 

# = 5129.4 

## * Cp 

## * Ps*Mw 

## * sqrt d P 

# 0 5129.4 

## * * 

# ,I * * = fpm fps 

# L ACFM= Vs *As 

## * = ACFM 144 144 

## \

. DSCFM= ACFM 

## * 528 * Ps 

# * (l-Bws) 

## * 528 

## * * 

# = DSCFM Ts (R) 

## * 29.92 

## * 29.92 

# I % Iso. 

### = 1039 

## * Vmstd 

## * Ts CR.) (l-Bws) 

## * Ps 

## * Tt 

## * Vs 

## * (On)"2 

# t. 1,039 * 

## * 

# = % 

# * * * *

# L 

# r r [ 

# r" [ 

# o 

# o L 

# L M 

# L 

# o I 1 

# l
I I I L 

## PREL1JvflNARY SETUP CALCULATIONS % 

### Moisture 

# = Md 

### = CO2 

### =

02 

# = CO 

### = N2 

# = MWd 

# =

MW 

# = AssumedRm 

### =

Assumed Tt 

# = Assumed cf 

### = Velocity Calculation Vs 

### =

= Nozzle Diameter Dn =

= 

### Meter Rate Calculated 

### Rm 

### = % 

### y= 8P 

### = "H2O % 

### '18 P 

### = "H2O % Pb 

### = "Hg % 

### Cp 

# = % 

### Ts 

### = of



# --- Tm 

# = of



# --- (28.966) Psa 

# = "H2O (0.60-0.85) cfm min 

### (scfm 

# * Tt)



## (

___***~8** 

### P ) = ___fps

Rm*Ts*Y



### , 0.33 

# * Vs 

# * TIn 

# * Md



### Desired in 

### Actual in



# -- --
0.33 

# * (Vs

## *~) *Tm * Md 

### *Dn 2 

### Ts 

### *y

= cfm cfm 

# * Tt 

### = cf Correction factor 

# = elin 

# = @ 

### '18 

### P Rate Correction Multipliers 

# = Rrn(new) 

# = TmCnew) 

### + 460 

# * Rm(old) Tm(old) 

### + 460



## ___*

# '1 8 P @

__ _



## ___* \18 P @

__ _



# ___* \18 P @

__ _



### ___* '18 

### P @

__ _



### ___*,18P @

__ _



### ___*,18P @

__ _ 

## ° PTm °PTm °PTm °PTm °PTm °PTm 

# .

# . .

OR oR

"Hg

# r'

. 

# : rTEST, Inc. Sampling Data 

# ICollllllOllls
Project # Meter Box # %C02 

### Imp. Initial Final 

# r Plant Meter Cal. (Y) %02 1 Unit/Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp) %CO 2

Operator Nozzle # %N2 

### 3 

# r Run # Nozzle Dia. (in.) Assumed Moist % 4 Date Stack Dia.(in.) Final Moist. % 

### 5 

# rSampleTime Static Press.{"Hg.) Final Isokinetic % 6 

### Minlpt Bar. Press. ("Hg) 

### Initial Leak Rate cfm@ 

### "Hg Filter # 

### Leak Check Vol Final Leak Rate cfm@ 

### "Hg 

# [. Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter 

### Imp. 

### Dry Gas Portl Time Meter (CF) Velocity Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. 

### Temp. Point ("H20) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) 

### In Out 

# L 

# [ 

# r [ 

# I I [ 

# I 

# ! ! 

# l !

# f' r I NOTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE 

### TEST 

### (This notification is not required 

## if you do not have to conduct aperformance test under the regulation.) Applicable Rule: 

### 40 CPR. Part 

### 63, Subpart N--National Emission Standards for Chromiwn Emissions from Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks


### 1. Print or type 

### the following for each plant in which chromium. electroplating and/or chromium anodizing operations are performed Owner/OperatorfTitle Huntington Plating, Inc, Street Address 

### 625 Monroe Avenue City Huntington State_W_es_t _V_ir,lo:g_im_'a

______ _ Plant Name 

### Zip Code 

### _2....,;57_04

___ _ Plant Phone Nwnber 

### (304) 522-0381**~~---------------------------------------------** Plant ContactfTitle Tom Houvouras, President Plant Address (if different than owner/operator's): Street Address Same as Above City State



# ----------- 

# -------------------- Zip Code
2. Complete the following table. IT additional lines are needed, make copies of this page. Rectifier Tank Capacity Description of Emissions Date of 

### ID# Type ofTank Startup date (amperes) parts plated limit performance test



### 1 Hard Chrome 

### 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 

### 10/612005 2 Hard Chrome 

### 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 

### 10/612005 3 HardCbrome 

### 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mgIdscm 

### 10/612005 4 Hard Chrome 

### 12/1611993 3000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 

### 10/612005 Testing is required because of the addition of a new composite mesh pad scrubber system