alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                              SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO

                          AAR CORP. STOCK BENEFIT PLAN





         WHEREAS, AAR CORP. (the "Company") adopted the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit
Plan (the "Plan") on July 16, 1992, amended the Plan by a First Amendment dated
July 29, 1996, a Second Amendment dated January 2, 1997, a Third Amendment dated
May 6, 1997, a Fourth Amendment dated March 20, 1998, a Fifth Amendment dated
July 14, 1998, and a Sixth Amendment dated December 16, 1999, and reserved the
right to further amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Company deems it appropriate to further amend the Plan as
described below, effective October 11, 2000, and such amendment was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors through its Compensation Committee at its October 11,
2000 meeting, subject to shareholder approval of the amendment at the next
shareholder annual meeting.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective
October 11, 2000; provided, however, that if this amendment does not receive
shareholder approval at the 2001 annual meeting of shareholders, then this
amendment shall be null and void ab initio:

         Section 4.3 is amended to read as follows:

                  "4.3 The total number of shares with respect to which options
         may be granted under the Plan to any Grantee during any calendar year
         shall not exceed the number of shares available for issue under the
         Plan at the time of grant."

<Page>

         This Seventh Amendment has been executed by the Company, by its duly
authorized officer, effective the 11th day of October, 2000, and attested by its
Secretary.

                                    AAR CORP.





                                    By /s/ David P. Storch
                                      -------------------------
                                       David P. Storch
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:




/s/ Howard A. Pulsifer
--------------------------------
Howard A. Pulsifer, Secretary



SEAL

                                       2
FILED

February 17, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) FOR PUBLICATION

) Filed: February 17, 1998

Appellee, )

) DYER CRIMINAL

v. )

) Hon. Joe G. Riley,

GLENN BERNARD MANN, ) Judge

)

Appellant, ) Supreme Court

) No. 02-S01-9609-CC-00077

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

 A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of appellant, Glenn Bernard

Mann in which he requests the opportunity to rebrief and reargue the issue that his

sentence is disproportionate under this Court’s recent decision in State v. Bland,

__ S.W.2d __ (Tenn. 1997). He asserts that “the failure to allow him the benefit of

the new Bland procedures . . . would violate the Due Process Clauses of the

Fourteenth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution.” 

We disagree. The opinion in Bland plainly states that the enumerated

factors had been drawn from “a review of the comparative proportionality

discussions contained in our prior decisions.” Therefore, the procedures are not

“new.” 

An amicus curiae brief on comparative proportionality review has been

submitted by Professor Dwight Aarons, of the University of Tennessee College of

Law and Professor Michael Blankenship, of East Tennessee State University. We

note that the brief was due before the decisions in Bland and Mann were

released, but it was not filed until after their release. The amicus curiae submits

that the pool of similar cases should include all first degree murder cases. In

addition, they argue that some of the factors enumerated in the Bland decision do

not aid the analysis, and others are irrelevant to the proportionality question. A

majority of this Court agreed upon the analysis set forth in Bland. Though the
Court did not have the benefit of the amicus curiae brief, the decision in Bland

addressed the issues raised therein. The members of the Court continue to

adhere to their respective opinions in Bland. 

Accordingly, a majority of this Court had determined that the petition to

rehear should be denied. Justice Reid would grant the petition to rehear and

utilize some of the material in the amicus curiae brief to refine the procedures

announced in Bland.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition to rehear is denied.

FOR THE COURT:

_____________________________________

Frank F. Drowota, III,

Justice

Concur:

Anderson, C. J. 

Birch, Holder, JJ.

Reid, J. - Dissents from the denial of the petition to rehear.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57403-57404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Physiology and Ethology; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463; as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Physiology and Ethology (1160).
    Date and Time: October 23-25, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
    Place: NSF, Room 390, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. William E. Zamer, Program Director, 
Integrative Animal Biology, Division of Integrative Biology and 
Neuroscience, Room 685N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 292-8421.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: October 25, 2000. 10 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.--
discussion on research

[[Page 57404]]

trends, opportunities and assessment procedures in Integrative 
Animal Biology.
    Closed Session: October 23, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., 
October 24, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; and October 25, 2000, 8:30 
a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. to review and 
evaluate Integrative Animal Biology proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information, of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information financial data, such as salaries; and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Meeting Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-24411 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History: Annual                               
|View History: Annual                               
|View History:                                      
|                                                   
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                   
|                                                   
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 135    | 126    | 84     | 76     | 45     | 66     | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 42    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 14     | 18     | 31     | 64     | 31     | 39     | 58     | 17     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 110    | 93     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
---

Exhibit 31.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Section 302 Certification





I, Michael Sawtell, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smaller reporting company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;








Date: June 28, 2010/s/ Michael SawtellMichael SawtellChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pervasip Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul H. Riss, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Date:  April 15, 2010


/s/ Paul H. RissPaul H. RissChief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer














This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martha Weatherspoon, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the defendant, we conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s request to charge entrapment as an affirmative defense (see, *People v Butts,*72 NY2d 746; *People v Lauder,*65 AD2d 520; *People v Riley,*65 AD2d 608; *People v Moore,*62 AD2d 930; *People v Sundholm,*58 AD2d 224, 228). Thus viewed, the evidence established that defendant repeatedly refused to sell cocaine despite repeated and persistent requests for nearly two months from a person with whom she had a close relationship and that she only arranged the subject sale in the hope that this person would stop badgering her for more drugs. The court’s failure to charge entrapment requires reversal because the defense was central to defendant’s case *(see, People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301; *People v Steele,*26 NY2d 526, 529; *of, People v Warren,*76 NY2d 773). A new trial is required, however, only on those counts of the indictment to which the defense of entrapment would have applied, and not on the two counts of criminal possession of a con*866trolled substance in the third degree and one count of criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, which were based on evidence seized pursuant to a valid search warrant.

Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. Defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge because the proposed testimony of that witness would have been cumulative *(see, People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126, 132-133; *People v Buckler,*39 NY2d 895). Defendant’s claim that her conviction of second degree conspiracy was inconsistent with the verdict acquitting the codefendant of the same charge was not properly preserved by timely objection *(see, People v Satloff,*56 NY2d 745, 746) and lacks merit in any event *(see, People v Berkowitz,*50 NY2d 333, 342-343; *People v Schwimmer,*47 NY2d 1004, 1005). On this record no aspect of defendant’s sentence is harsh and excessive.

Accordingly, defendant’s convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and conspiracy in the second degree must be reversed, the sentences thereon vacated and a new trial granted. Otherwise the judgment is affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, first degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 37     | 37     | 66     | 50     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4662 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Trifloxystrobin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Trifloxystrobin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSTROBIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.76 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Trifloxystrobin) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘5.4%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4662 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifiesin his capacity as an officer of the Company (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Companyon Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financialstatements included in such report.             Date: March 27, 2007 By:  /s/ O. Leonard Dorminey    O. Leonard Dorminey    President and Chief Executive Officer