alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                           
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                           
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4      | 3      | 3      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4735 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on ACM. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

ACM. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.79 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ACM) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.7%’’ and inserting ‘‘2.8%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4735 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BIOPHONE CORPORATION v. WESTERN ELECTRIC CO., Inc., et al.

No. 6339-6342.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Aug. 10, 1937.

Holland Duell and Philip T. Dalsimer, both of New York City, for appellant.

Henry R. Ashton, of New York City (Charles Neave, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In these patent infringement cases, the court below, on January 30, 1935, on default of defendant, entered decrees adjudging the patents sued on valid and infringed by defendant, and on September 29,1936, referred the cases to a master for an accounting. As stated by the court below: “Mr. Alfred Weiss, president and controlling owner of the defendant, learned of the denial of the defendant’s motions to dismiss the bills of complaint and of the orders for decrees pro confesso in December of 1935, but, says he, ‘at that time defendant was out of business and I was not aware that the matter was of any practical importance.’ ”

Neither Weiss, who was its president and chief owner, his company, nor its counsel tooks steps to vacate the court’s order of January 30, 1935, until December 11, 1936, when, as stated by the court, “he is now impelled to view these defaults in another light by reason of their effect on suits brought by the defendant as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs as defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.”

On this showing the court said: “Terms of court passed after this actual notice upon the part of defendant’s controller but he continued to sleep away its rights. There is but one inference here and that ’is that the defendant did not intend to defend these suits until it was deemed expedient to do so in the light of its litigation elsewhere,” and dismissed defendant’s petition to open the default decrees.

 Passing by the question whether the court had power after the term to vacate its decrees, the basic question involved is whether, in view of all the facts and circumstances set forth at large in the Judge’s memorandum, did the court below abuse its discretion in deciding that defendant’s motion should be denied. We are of opinion it did not. The defendant, with knowledge of the decree, took no steps to open because it regarded the order as of no moment and its delayed motion was an afterthought due to changed conditions. It elected to sleep on its alleged rights, and equity favors the vigilant and looks with disfavor on the dilatory suitor.

So holding, the decrees below are affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, William E. Alvarez, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Datedthis 3rd day of March, 2006.         By: /s/ William E. Alvarez, Jr.       William E. Alvarez, Jr.,      Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4873 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Imidacloprid and 

Thiodicarb. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING IMIDACLOPRID AND 

4 THIODICARB. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4873 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing 1-[(6- 

Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]- 

N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine 

(imidacloprid) (CAS No. 

138261–41–3) and 6- 

chloro-3-pyridinylmethyl)- 

1,3-thiazolidin-2- 

ylidenecyanamid 

(thiodicarb) (CAS No. 

59669–26–0) (provided for 

in subheading 3808.91.25) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                          J.P. MORGAN CHASE CAPITAL XI


      THIS Certificate of Trust of J.P. Morgan Chase Capital XI (the "Trust"),
dated as of August 24, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del.C. Section 3801, et seq.).

      1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is J.P. Morgan Chase
Capital XI.

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are The Bank
of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.


                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                                        as Delaware Trustee


                                    By:  /s/ William T. Lewis
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                          Name:  William T. Lewis
                                        Title:  SVP


                                    DINA DUBLON, as Administrative Trustee


                                      /s/ Dina Dublon
                                    --------------------------------------------



                                    JOHN C. WILMOT, as Administrative Trustee


                                      /s/ John C. Wilmot
                                    --------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Cruz, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J., at suppression hearing, jury trial and sentence), rendered July 7, 1988, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of *8 Vs*to 25 years and 5 to 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

An eyewitness was unable to identify defendant in a photo array two months after the commission of the crimes for which defendant was convicted. Nevertheless she was permitted to make an in-court identification of defendant at trial, some two years later. We believe the testimony was properly admitted, and that the prior inability to identify defendant related to the weight, and not the admissibility, of the testimony *(People v McCullers,*40 AD2d 796, *affd*33 NY2d 806).

We find no merit to defendant’s claim that the court abused *307its discretion in imposing the maximum sentence. Concur— Ross, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
#### Alfred RAO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1954.

*427Baldwin & Votaw, by W. J. Baldwin, Everett Lord, Beaumont, for appellant.

Ramie H. Griffin, Cr. Dist. Atty., Joe B. Goodwin, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Beaumont, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for possessing marijuana, a narcotic drug; the punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

The testimony in behalf of the state shows that Henry Austin, City Detective of the Beaumont Police Department, with four other officers, went to the home of appellant on June 16, 1953, and there informed appellant that they had a search warrant for his residence. Detective Austin testified that during the search he found two marijuana cigarettes in a dresser drawer in appellant’s room, which cigarettes he marked for identification purposes and later identified at the trial.

It was further shown that these two cigarettes were properly forwarded to the Texas Department of Public Safety at Austin for laboratory examination.

J. D. Chastain, chemist and toxicologist, Texas Department of Public Safety, testified that on June 18, 1953, he received two cigarettes in an envelope through the mail which he identified at the trial; that he made a test of the same to determine if they contained marijuana, and further said that the test showed that both of the cigarettes contained marijuana.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, gave, in substance, the same testimony as the officers as to the discovery by them of the two cigarettes in the dresser drawer in his room on June 16, 1953. He further stated that on the night previous to the search of his room he had sold some whiskey to two seamen who gave him the two cigarettes in question; that he thought they were foreign cigarettes; and that he did not know that the cigarettes contained marijuana until he was so informed by the officers.

The jury resolved the issues of fact against appellant and we find the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Appellant contends that the search of his room was illegal because of an invalid search warrant, therefore the court erred in admitting said cigarettes in evidence.

The possession of the two cigarettes in question was admitted by the appellant, however, he claimed that he did not know that they contained marijuana until so informed by the officers.

Having admitted the possession of the cigarettes in question, appellant is not in position to complain of proof of that same fact by the officers. Soble v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 629, 218 S.W.2d 195; Salinas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 266 S.W.2d 388; 13A Texas Dig. 537, Crim.Law,

It is observed that the court, in sentencing the defendant, failed to make *428application of the indeterminate sentence law, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 775. We therefore reform the sentence so as to read that appellant be confined in the state penitentiary for not less than two nor more than ten years.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN DIVISION 

TAYAUN MESSER, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff § 

 § No. 1:20-cv-00125-LY 

v. § 

 § 

THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE § 

INSURANCE COMPANY, § 

 § 

 Defendant § 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONCERNING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 

 Defendant The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company hereby gives notice to the 

Court that the parties have reached a settlement that resolves all the remaining post-judgment 

issues concerning attorney’s fees and costs. Accordingly, there are no further issues or motions 

before the Court that require resolution. 

Dated: October 1, 2021 

 Respectfully submitted, 

MCDOWELL HETHERINGTON LLP 

By:_/s/ Jason A. Richardson 

Jason A. Richardson 

Texas Bar No.: 24056206 

1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2700 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 337-8872 

Facsimile: (713) 337-8862 

Email: Jason.Richardson@mhllp.com

Counsel for Defendant

 

Case 1:20-cv-00125-LY Document 31 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I certify that on October 1, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: 

Jon M. Smith 

3305 Northland Drive 

Suite 500 

Austin Texas 78731 

Telephone: (512) 371-1006 

Facsimile: (512) 476-6685 

Email: jon@jonmichaelsmith.com 

/s/ Jason A. Richardson __ 

 Jason A. Richardson 

Case 1:20-cv-00125-LY Document 31 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Ex parte KOLLENBORN.

No. A-4678.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 9, 1954.

James L. Mitchell, Dallas, for relator.

Dee Brown Walker, Dallas, for respondent Kay Kollenborn.

WILSON, Justice.

We granted this original motion for habeas corpus upon relator’s representation that it was impossible for him to purge himself by compliance with a contempt order growing out of a divorce case now pending on appeal. Relator contends that the payment required is $400 per month, which,' under the circumstances, he cannot possibly meet.

Before we can dispose of that question, we must first meet his contention that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enforce its original judgment by contempt since an appeal had been perfected and supersedeas bond filed. The divorce judgment provided a child support payment of $150 per month for two children and a total “sum of $400.00 per month as temporary child support and temporary alimony pending final disposition of this cause”. We hold that the appeal of the divorce judgment and the filing of the supersedeas bond did not supersede either the child support or temporary alimony and that the trial court retained a continuing jurisdiction to enforce both. Rule 364, T.R.C.P., provides that a supersedeas bond “shall not have the effect of suspending the judgment as to the care or custody of the child” unless it is specifically ordered. It follows that since the supersedeas bond in this case does not contain specific terms superseding child custody, child support should not be superseded.

By reason of Art. 4637, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., it has long been held that an order fixing temporary alimony is interlocutory and not superseded on appeal. Ex parte, Lohmuller, 103 Tex. 474, 129 S.W. 834, 29 L.R.A.,N.S., 303; Ex parte Scott, 133 Tex. 1, 123 S.W.2d 306, 126 S.W.2d 626.

Relator has two children by a former marriage now living with him in a home belonging to the community of his second marriage. The support of these two children is but indirectly involved. In addition, he has two children by the present marriage for whose support and the temporary alimony of the wife this con*340tempt proceeding was filed. The record on the contempt hearing contains a relatively full account of his resources and expenses. After a full review of the record we cannot say that the contempt judgment of the trial court is so wholly without support as to be void.

This contempt order is specifically limited to the payment for the month of March. Relator can purge himself by paying $400. Further efforts to collect other payments will call for new and additional hearings in the trial court at which time the trial court will have full opportunity to determine the relator’s precise ability to meet those pay-, ments.

Relator is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County. Costs are adjudged against relator.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4909 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hybrid electric vehicle inverters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CLARKE of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hybrid electric 

vehicle inverters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE INVERT4 ERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4909 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Inverters for converting 

DC battery output to three 

phase AC output designed 

to power an electric drive 

motor, certified by the importer for use in hybrid 

electric vehicles (provided 

for in subheading 

8504.40.95) ....................... 1.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.02   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of VolitionRX Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Malcolm Lewin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Malcolm Lewin By: Malcolm Lewin Chief Financial Officer  Dated: June 11, 2012     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.