alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4834 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4834

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic acid, diethyl-
                            , aluminum salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic acid, diethyl-
                            , aluminum salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHINIC ACID, DIETHYL-, ALUMINUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Phosphinic acid, diethyl-, 
aluminum salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                   
|No chart available.                                                   
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|New York Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### BURGESS v. STATE.

No. 24376.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record in this case is before us without any bills of exception or a statement of facts. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review. The indictment seems to be in due and legal form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4807 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain frozen treat makers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain frozen 

treat makers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FROZEN TREAT MAKERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Frozen treat makers (provided for in subheading 

(3924.10.40) ..................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4807 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|New Mexico--West Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|New Mexico--West Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 44     | 53     | 39     | 43     | 9      | 16     | W      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 12, 2008
    By:

/s/
Christian RagotChristian RagotPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4614 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4614

      To extend the suspension of duty on Carfentrazone-ethyl and 
                         formulations thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the suspension of duty on Carfentrazone-ethyl and 
                         formulations thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL AND FORMULATIONS THEREOF.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.54 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Carfentrazone-ethyl and 
formulations thereof) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4752 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4752

      To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 228.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Red 228.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 228.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Reactive Red 228    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (2,7-                                                             12/31/2015
                          Naphthalenedisulf
                          onic acid, 5-((4-
                          chloro-6-((2-(2-
                          (ethenylsulfonyl)
                          ethoxy)ethyl)
                          amino)-1,3,5-
                          triazin-2-
                          yl)amino)-3-((4-
                          (ethenylsulfonyl)
                          phenyl) azo)-4-
                          hydroxy-,
                          potassium sodium
                          salt) (CAS No.
                          101200-49-1)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00267-CV 

JUDITH MARIE GONZALEZ APPELLANT

V. 

PHILLIPS EQUITY CAPITAL, LLC APPELLEE

------------ 

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 2017-004046-1 

------------ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------ 

On January 8, 2018, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a).2 We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 

2We served our January 8, 2018 notice by letter to appellant’s last known 

physical address. Upon receiving no response, on February 7, 2018, we 

attempted to serve a second notice via email to the address provided in 
2

unless appellant filed with the court within ten days an appellant's brief and a 

motion reasonably explaining the failure to file an appellant's brief and the need 

for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have not 

received any response. 

Because appellant has failed to file a brief after having been given an 

opportunity to provide a reasonable explanation for the failure, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: February 15, 2018 

 

appellant’s affidavit of inability to afford payment of court costs. The email notice 

was returned as undeliverable.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


April 23, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1937


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1937 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-229551 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 23918.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1948.

W. J. Baldwin, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Jep S. Fuller, County Atty., and Alfred duPerier, Asst. County Atty., both of Beaumont, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the City Court of Beaumont on a charge for violating an ordinance of said city which, among other things, regulates the movement of ambulances on the streets of said city in response to emergency calls. The fine assessed in the City Court was $25. On appeal to the County Court the same fine was again assessed.

It will not be necessary to discuss the ordinance, or the evidence introduced in the case. Under Article 53 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fixing the jurisdiction of this Court on appeals, it is provided that the Court of Criminal Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of the State in all criminal matters on appeal except those which have been appealed from any inferior court to the county court, and in which the fine imposed by the county court does not exceed $100. No contention is made and no authorities cited to support the claim for a right to appeal in the case .now before us, contrary to said article. Many cases are discussed in the annotations to said article in Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

This Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the case is accordingly dismissed.
1 From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:54 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Owens, Nicole

Cc: Laity, Jim

Subject: Conclusion of EO 12866 and 13563 Review: SSM SIP Call (RIN No. 2060

‐ AR68)

This email serves as notice that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has concluded its review under Executive

Orders (EO) 12866 and 13563 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final rule titled State Implementation

Plans: Response to Petition for Rulemaking; Restatement and Update of EPA’s SSM Policy Applicable to SIPs; Findings of

Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to Amend Provisions Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of Startup,

Shutdown and Malfunction (RIN No. 2060

‐ AR68).

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202

‐ 395

‐ 3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
|                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                   
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Percentage of Crude Oil Proved Reserves from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Percent)
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Percentage of Crude Oil Proved Reserves from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Percent)
|                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 30.4   | 39.8   | 41.2   | 49.3   | 51.1   | 57.0   | 57.8   | 59.3  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 63.7   | 74.8   | 75.9   | 79.6   | 79.2   | 81.0   | 81.6   | 82.0   |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Jamba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen L. Luey, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Karen L. Luey                                
|Karen L. Luey                                    
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                 

Date: March 14, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer


And Chief
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by ForgeHouse, Inc. (“Registrant”), the
undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and
  2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/ JOHN
BRITCHFORD-STEEL
 
 John
Britchford-Steel
 Chief
Executive Officer





Date:  May
15, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
provided to ForgeHouse, Inc., and will be retained by ForgeHouse, Inc, and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.