alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       809,286
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,947,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                 298,929
<INVENTORY>                                  541,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,724,367
<PP&E>                                       878,731
<DEPRECIATION>                               190,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            10,537,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,864,020
<BONDS>                                      325,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                       12
<COMMON>                                   1,359,064
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,289,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              10,537,280
<SALES>                                    5,382,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,449,907
<CGS>                                      3,760,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,536,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             162,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            26,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,010,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2,010,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,010,883)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.16)



</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:petition for exemption/rulemaking
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2015 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Skains, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 6, 2015


/s/ Thomas E. SkainsThomas E. SkainsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Archives and Records Administration

Office afthe Federal Register

APR 2 2007

Ms. Nancy Molitor

Regulations Division (AGe-lOO)

Office oflhe Chief Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The :nnterinllislcd in the attachmcilt is approved for incorporation by rciercnee III 14 erR PaJ139.

Tnis approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our siaffs. The approval to Incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the efleClive date of your

linnl rule. JfY0l! wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

I. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register. and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2_ Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Oftice of [he rcdcral Register; and

3. Notify me in writing orthe change.

Smcerely,

r

?'~~~,W/~ .

"=---

RAYMOND A. MOSLEY

Director or tht' Federal Regis\{~r

Federal Register Artorney:

.,

.r-~

Attachment

u.s. mail addrcs'>: 8601 AJdphi Roou. Cnllcgc Park, MD 2U7~(}.QOO1

Offic••lociltion: 800 North Capitol Street., NW, Suite 700, WilShin~l(>n.lX:: 20001-11.•.1

FC'<.!era[Rq,ristcr "-cb Sitl'S:http://www.ardti\'l'S.gov jfl"lieral-rcgistcr !/Ililhllp:! /wWw.gpt ••1Cn's...•.gnv/nara
/1I(:orporutioll by Reference

Dodo No, FAA-20(}6-25965: Direclorare !dewi(ler ]006-NM-12 7-AD: A/Ildr. 39-i 50 13, AD 2iJ()7-07-0S

Airbus All Operators Telex

A300-78A0024

dated May 29, 2002

Airbus ServiC02Bulletin A300- Revision 1

78-0025, excluding

Appendix 1

dated February 16, 2005

D()t/.:er /Vo. F.AA-1006-]6685. DirecfOraie Idell/ifier ]006-IVM-20Q-AD: Amdl. 39-15015: AD 2007-07-14

Service Bulletin 145Leg- dated February 17. 2005

28-0022

Df)ckel No. F~tA-]()()7-] 7757: DirecfOrale Iden! iller ]{)O7-/Vivl-030-A D: A /llclr. 39-150 J 4. AD lO!i 7-07-13

EMBRAER

Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-31-

301

dated January 19, 2007

"rill/ed 3/3fJ/20f!7 Page! of!
#### HESBROOK v. STATE.

No. 23332.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1946.

See also 194 S.W.2d 260.

Kelley & Looney, Rogers Kelley, and L. Hamilton Lowe, all of Edinburg, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction upon plea of guilty to the offense of theft by false pretext; the punishment, four years in the State penitentiary.

The same procedure was here followed as set out in another case against the same appellant, being cause No. 23331, this day decided. That procedure will not be here again stated. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged.

Mrs. Villareal, the injured party, testified: “On or about November 24, 1944, I paid the defendant Albert Hesbrook, $100.00 for which he said he was going to buy some clothes and open a second-hand clothing store here for me. He never did buy any clothes with that $100.00 or return the money to me.”

This is all the testimony upon which this conviction rests.

It is now the settled law of this State that in order to constitute the crime of theft by false pretext under the provisions of Article 1413, P.C., the property must come into the possession of the accused as a result of a false representation *263or pretext. Roe v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 387, 144 S.W.2d 1104.

Under the instant facts, no false representations or pretext is shown. It is impossible to ascertain therefrom who began the negotiations leading up to the delivery of the $100 by the injured party to appellant. For aught this record shows, the injured party may have been the instigator of the transaction. Moreover, a reasonable construction to be placed upon the quoted language is that the injured party, without representation on the part of appellant, delivered to him the $100 which the appellant agreed and promised to use in buying second hand clothing and to open a store for her. Such facts would not constitute theft by false pretext. Stokely v. State, 24 Tex.App. 509, 6 S.W. 538; Segal v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 485, 265 S.W. 911, 35 A.L.R. 1331.

The facts being insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges' of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Howard, Also Known as Kalvin Howard, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and petit larceny. Defendant first contends that the court erred in conducting a portion of the voir dire at the Bench, in the presence of both counsel, but in his absence. That issue has not been preserved for review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and this is not an appropriate case to review in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Defendant’s claim of prejudice is unsupported in the record *(see, People v Ganett,*68 AD2d 81, *affd*51 NY2d 991) and it cannot be said that he was denied a fair trial *(see, People v Blake,*158 AD2d 979, *lv denied*75 NY2d 964; *see also, People v Dunlap,*161 AD2d 1114). For essentially the same reasons, we decline to review defendant’s unpreserved argument that the court’s "interested witness” charge was inadequate.

There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support defendant’s grand larceny conviction under Penal Law § 155.30 (4). The victim testified that upon discovering the theft of her "credit card”, she canceled the card, and the victim’s dormitory advisor testified that she immediately notified VISA, the issuer of the card, of the theft and canceled the card. In our view, this evidence was sufficient to prove that the stolen VISA card was a "credit card” as defined in General Business Law § 511 (1) *(see, People v Ames,*115 AD2d 545, *lv denied*67 NY2d 759; *see also, People v Davis-Ivery,*158 AD2d 959, *lv denied*75 NY2d 965).

Finally, while the court improperly permitted a police officer and a security officer to testify concerning the description of the alleged perpetrator which had been given to them by the victim and her dormitory advisor, any error in this regard *923was harmless. There is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant but for the improperly received testimony *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230).

We have reviewed defendant’s other claims of error and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.2**











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of First Valley Bancorp (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Blum,
      Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer of the Bank, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Bank.








_/
      s /
      Mark J. Blum_______________


Mark
      J.
      Blum


Executive
      Vice President,


Treasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer


and
      Principal Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles T. Hall, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered October 25, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

We have reviewed the record and we agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that the defendant voluntarily waived his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea bargain *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*380 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-130147 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2005 (September 20, 2005 as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Note 12) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatoryparagraphs referring to (1) allocations of certain assets and expense items applicable to Horizon and subsidiaries, (2) the bankruptcy filing of the Combined Companies and the fact the combined financial statements do not include any adjustmentsthat might result should the Combined Companies be unable to continue as a going concern and (3) referring to the restatement of the financial statements), relating to the combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries andof our report dated April 22, 2005 (June 8, 2005 as to the effect of the restatement discussed in Note A to the schedule) (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the restatement of the financial statement schedule) relating tothe financial statement schedule of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of International Coal Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Louisville, Kentucky 

November 14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000090283
<NAME>                        SILICONIX INC
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       APR-2-2000
<CASH>                                                 38,695
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          78,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                           16,074
<INVENTORY>                                            48,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      235,228
<PP&E>                                                344,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                        192,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        395,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 135,582
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  299
<OTHER-SE>                                            242,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          395,121
<SALES>                                               114,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      114,465
<CGS>                                                  60,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          60,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       19,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        34,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                            7,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           26,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.90



</TABLE>
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 17     | 18     | 24     | 35     | 15     | 12     | 33     | 2      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. does
hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2010/s/ Michael SawtellMichael SawtellChief Executive Officer
Section 1350 Certifications

**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Julio De Leon, Chief Financial Officer,  Director and principal accounting officer of Tao Minerals Ltd., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") for the period ended January 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:

 (i)       fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tao Minerals Ltd.

 
|   | By: | */s/*Julio De Leon*CFO* and a member of the Board of Directors(who also performs the function of  principal accounting officer)

May 16, 2007 |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tao Minerals Ltd., and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

CW1211031.1
Docket No: FAA-2015-7533 Dir ID: 2015-NM-080-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman

Airlines for America Robert Ireland