alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 23     | 12     | 9      | 21     | 7      | 0      | 1      | 9      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 19     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### E. Joseph Fontanella, Respondent, v Diane Fontanella, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered on or about July 25, 1989, which conditioned the denial of plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s testimony on defendant’s payment to plaintiffs counsel of $300 in attorney’s fees, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and as so modified, affirmed.

The court was within its discretion in conditioning the denial of plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s testimony upon defendant’s payment of plaintiffs attorney’s fees. (CPLR 3126.) Those fees were necessitated solely by defendant’s failure to comply with the court’s earlier order which required that she serve and file an affidavit of net worth by March 17, 1989. However, the court abused its discretion by arbitrarily fixing the amount of the fees, and we accordingly remand so that fees may be fixed upon a proper showing of the value of the work necessitated and amount of time actually expended. Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
#### Clarence Alton TATE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27246.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. . '

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the felony offense of driving, while intoxicated, a motor vehicle upon a public highway, with punishment assessed at a fine of $250.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or hills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                      
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                      
|Louisiana (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 1      | 3      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### HASSELL v. STATE.

No. 23352.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1946.

G. C. Harris, of Greenville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $150.00 and •shirty days’ confinement in jail.

The record is without statement of facts or bills of exceptions.

Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER' CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act.

The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved.

The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 14, 2000.

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 14, 2000.

The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of January, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

## Appendix

[FR Doc. 00-2495  Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
----

Action brought on 7 December 2005 — Artegodan v Commission

(Case T-429/05)

(2006/C 48/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Artegodan GmbH (Lüchow, Germany) (represented by: U. Doepner, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks compensation from the Commission under the second paragraph of Article 288 EC and Article 235 EC and a declaration that the defendant is under an obligation to compensate the applicant for all future damage which it will incur as a result of marketing expenses.

In relation to the background to the dispute, it should be pointed out that the applicant is the proprietor of the legal rights of the authorisation for the pharmaceutical preparation Tenuate retard, which contains amfepramone. On 9 March 2000, the defendant adopted, on the basis of Article 15a of Directive 75/319/EEC, (1) Decision C(2000) 453 concerning the withdrawal of marketing authorisations of medicinal products for human use containing ‘amfepramone’. By decision of 11 April 2000, the competent German authorities implemented that latter Commission decision. By judgment of 26 November 2002 in Joined Cases T-74/00, T-76/00, T-83/00 to T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 the Court of First Instance declared Commission Decision C(2000) 453 invalid. The appeal lodged by the Commission against that judgment was dismissed by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C-39/03 P.

In the reasons given in its action the applicant submits that, by reason of Decision C(2000) 453, the Commission acted unlawfully and thereby infringed various provisions serving to protect the applicant. The applicant claims that its basic right to carry on the business which it established (company and property rights) was infringed. In addition, it alleges infringement of Article 11 of Directive 65/65/EEC. (2) Furthermore, the applicant claims that the Commission infringed the principle of proportionality and the basic principles of sound administration.

The applicant submits that it suffered harm as a result of the decision in question and the implementation thereof. According to the applicant, the defendant should pay to it compensation in regards of the infringements identified above.

----

(1)  Second Council Directive 75/319/EEC of 20 May 1975 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products.

(2)  Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products.

----
#### DEVEAURUX v. STATE.

No. 26526.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Oct. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*569GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | -1     | 0      | 11     | -11    | -1     | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID LOPEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 058

- C R

Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20110D03 070 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no

later than May 23 , 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th d ay of April , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 62     | 66     | 64     | 88     | 80     | 100    | 89     | 89     | 78    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 82     | 79     | 118    | 115    | 103    | 134    | 132    | 121    | 143    | 161   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 153    | 182    | 182    | 119    | 98     | 85     | 74     | 92     | 83     |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
# Euroopa Liidu C 83A/6. a

| | ISSN 1725-5082 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 83A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 49. köide6. aprill 2006 |

ISSN 1725-5082

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 83A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

49. köide6. aprill 2006

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Komisjon |
| 2006/C 083A/1 | Teade Ühenduse Sordiameti asejuhataja ametikoha täitmise kohta (palgaaste A*12) (personalieeskirjade artikli 29 lõige 2) – KOM/2006/10022 | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Komisjon

2006/C 083A/1

Teade Ühenduse Sordiameti asejuhataja ametikoha täitmise kohta (palgaaste A*12) (personalieeskirjade artikli 29 lõige 2) – KOM/2006/10022

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Komisjon

| 6.4.2006 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2006

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 83/1

---

TEADE ÜHENDUSE SORDIAMETI ASEJUHATAJA AMETIKOHA TÄITMISE KOHTA

(palgaaste A*12)

(personalieeskirjade artikli 29 lõige 2)

KOM/2006/10022

(2006/C 83 A/01)

Ühenduse Sordiamet võtab tööle asejuhataja.

Kandideerija peab olema Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigi kodanik.

Nõukogu nimetab asejuhataja ametisse kandidaatide nimekirjast, mille komisjon esitab pärast ameti haldusnõukogu arvamuse saamist. Palga- ja teenistustingimused on sätestatud Euroopa ühenduste personalieeskirjade A*12 palgaastme ametnikke käsitlevas osas. Ühenduse Sordiamet ja komisjon järgivad võrdsete võimaluste poliitikat.

Töö kirjeldus, avalduste vormid ja avalduste saatmise juhised on allalaadimiseks saadaval järgmistel veebilehtedel:

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm
  ja |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

ja

| | http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm. |
| --- | --- |

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm.

Avalduste esitamise tähtaeg on 8. mai 2006 (vt üksikasju avalduste saatmise juhistest).

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

OLIVERIO ALONSO ESTRADALEMUS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10198

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00285-PMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Oliverio Alonso Estrada-Lemus appeals from the 36-month sentence

imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in

the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

MAR 09 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10198

 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Estrada-Lemus contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because the district court failed to consider the age of his prior conviction under

United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2009), and because he

is unlikely to reoffend. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors

set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See

United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2010)

(emphasizing the limited scope of Amezcua-Vasquez). 

AFFIRMED.