alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Courtside Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended December  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|               |  |  |        |  |  |                          |
|---------------|--|--|--------|--|--|--------------------------|
| March 8, 2007 |  |  | By:    |  |  | /s/ Richard D. Goldstein |
|          |  |  |   |  |  | Richard D. Goldstein     |
|          |  |  |   |  |  | Chief Executive Officer  |
| March 8, 2007 |  |  | By:    |  |  | /s/ Carl D. Harnick      |
|          |  |  |   |  |  | Carl D. Harnick          |
|          |  |  |   |  |  | Chief Financial Officer  |
|               |

----
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2023 Workiva-->
<!--r:b7452f63-d5ca-4524-b012-2bcd4e8d7876,g:8abf4a12-1b24-488c-a3ca-4ef7635cfed8-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:pvh="http://www.pvh.com/20231207" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.pvh.com/20231207">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023/dei-2023.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20231207_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20231207_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="DocumentandEntityInformationDocument" roleURI="http://www.pvh.com/role/DocumentandEntityInformationDocument">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Document and Entity Information Document</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
  <xs:element id="pvh_CoverPageAbstract" abstract="true" name="CoverPageAbstract" nillable="true" xbrli:periodType="duration" substitutionGroup="xbrli:item" type="xbrli:stringItemType"/>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CA-350-1430-EU; CACA-20540] 

# AGENCY:

United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.

# ACTION:

Termination of Recreation and Public Purposes Classification and Opening Order, Lassen County, California. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice effects public lands in Lassen County, California within T.30 N., R.12 E., Section 21, W                        1/2                        SESE, M.D.M. Classification under the Recreation and Public Purposes Act is terminated by this notice and opens the affected lands to disposal by exchange.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 28, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Wannebo, Realty Specialist, Eagle Lake Field Office, BLM, 2950 Riverside Drive, Susanville CA 96130, (530) 257-0456. 

Dated: September 22, 2000. 

Linda D. Hansen, 

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-24898 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 31     | 0      | 1      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit
31.2


CERTIFICATIONS




I, H.
MacGregor Clarke, certify that:




1.            
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2009 of AeroGrow International, Inc.;




2.            
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.            
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.            
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




(a)          
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and




(b)          
Omitted; and




(c)          
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)          
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.            
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)          
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)          
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date: July
      1, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      H. MacGregor ClarkeH.
      MacGregor ClarkeChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Servicer") hereby certifies on behalf of the Servicer
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2005-AR4, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 30, 2006.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         President
* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c), Kenneth S. Apfel is substituted for

John J. Callahan, former Acting Commissioner of Soc ial Security, as the defendant in this action.

** This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 20 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
BENTON G. MOORE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, *

Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-7080 (D.C. No. 96-CV-227-S) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

Before ANDERSON , McKAY , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ reques t for a decision on the briefs1 The parties consented to proceed before a magistrat e judge. See28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c). -2- without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Claimant Benton G. Moore appeals the district court ’s order 1 affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny his application forsocial security disability benefits. The Commissioner determined that Mr. Moo re could perform sedentary work available in significant numbers in the local and national economies and, therefore, he is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Mr. Moore contends that the Commissioner (1) failed to recognize that his skin condition significantly limits his ability to work, (2) improperly applied the medical-vocational guidelines (the grids), and (3) applied the incorrect legal standards. We affirm. We review the Commissioner’s decision to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence and whether corre ct legal standards were applied. SeeHawkins v. Chater , 113 F.3d 1162, 1164 (10th Cir. 1997). Substantial evidence is “‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’” Soli z v. Chater , 82 F.3d 373, 375 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (further quotation omitted)). We may neither rewei gh the evidence nor substitute-3-

our judgment for that of the Commissioner. See Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 933 F.2d 799, 800 (10th Cir. 1991). We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, as well as the briefs submitted by the parties. Applying the standards s et out above, we affirm the denial of benefits for substantially the reasons st ated in the magistrate judge’s March 10, 1997 recommendation, as adopted by the di strict court. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Eastern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
#### STEPHENSON v. STATE.

No. 23845.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1947.

No appearance for appellant. ■

Ernest-S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. . -

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is- for driving while intoxicated an ‘automobile on a public highway in Atascosa County.

Appellant was tried before a jury upon a plea of not guilty. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed the punish*246ment at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days in jail.

The proceedings appear to be regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**VALENCIA RAINEY**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 84 DB 2016 (No. 74 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 58977** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 19 th**  **day of September, 2016, the Report and Recommendat ion**  **of Disciplinary Board Member dated September 8, 2016, is approved and it is**  **ORDERED that Valencia Rainey, who has been on Administ rative Suspension, has**  **never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.18    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 3
  TO
  STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT    
  


    THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") dated as of June 22, 2001, is made by and among Olympic Property Group LLC, a
Washington limited liability company ("OPG"), Olympic Water and Sewer, Inc., a Washington corporation (the "Company"), and Port Ludlow Associates LLC, a Washington limited liability company
("Purchaser"), regarding that certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 29, 2001, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated June 1, 2001, and Amendment No. 2 dated
June 13, 2001 (as amended, the "Agreement"), among OPG, the Company, and Purchaser, for the purchase and sale of the shares of capital stock of the Company (the "Shares"). 


    I.  EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.  This Amendment amends and modifies the Agreement. In the event of any conflict
between the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment shall control. Except as contained within the Agreement and this Amendment, there are no other agreements or understandings among OPG, the
Company, and Purchase relating to the Shares. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them under the Agreement. 



    II.  EXTENSION OF TIME.  In Section 9.17 of the Agreement, the date "June 22, 2001," is
hereby replaced by the date "June 29, 2001." 





 


    Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. 



	PURCHASER:	 	PORT LUDLOW ASSOCIATES LLC, a Washington limited liability company
	

 	
 	

By West Coast Northwest Pacific Partners LLC, a Washington limited liability company, its manager
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ RANDALL J. VERRUE   

	 	 	Print Name:	 	Randall J. Verrue

	 	 	Its:	 	President & CEO

	

 	
 	

Date:	
 	

8/1/01

	
OPG:	
 	

OLYMPIC PROPERTY GROUP LLC, a Washington limited liability company
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ GREGORY M. MCCARRY   

	 	 	Print Name:	 	Gregory M. McCarry

	 	 	Its:	 	C.O.O.

	

 	
 	

Date:	
 	

8/1/01

	
COMPANY:	
 	

OLYMPIC WATER AND SEWER, INC., a Washington corporation
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ TOM GRIFFIN   

	 	 	Print Name:	 	Tom Griffin

	 	 	Its:	 	President

	

 	
 	

Date:	
 	

8/1/01





2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.18


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
#### SALAS v. SALAS.

No. 15712.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 13, 1948.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1948.

S. D. Hopkins, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Levey & Goldstein, of San Antonio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jose Salas, who has appealed from a divorce decree rendered in favor of Adelina H. Salas, seeks a writ of prohibition from this Court to prevent the District Court from hearing contempt proceedings instituted upon the complaint that Jose Salas has failed to comply with a support order issued under Article 4639a, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stats., which is included in the decree granting the divorce.

An allowance for support of minor children after divorce is in many respects similar to an award of alimony pendente life.

Upon authority of Ex parte Birkhead, 127 Tex. 556, 95 S.W.2d 953, Ex parte Hodges, 130 Tex. 280, 109 S.W.2d 964, and Ex parte Lohmuller, 103 Tex. 474, 129 S.W. 834, 29 A.L.R., N.S., 303, the application for writ of prohibition is refused.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc., (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
Craven, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





UNIVERSAL
      BIOENERGY, INC.By
                /s/ Richard CravenRichard
      CravenChief
      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
  PresidentJanuary
      4, 2010
#### JINKS et al. v. WHITAKER.

No. A-967.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1946.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1946.

Clyde H. Hall, of Longview, for petitioners.

James & Lee and L. L. James, all of Tyler, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is “Refused, No Reversible Error.” Lest the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals be misconstrued, we hold that the “take nothing” judgment of the district court, construed in the light of the pleadings, did not have the effect of vesting title to the surface in .the defendant, respondent here. The Court of Civil Appeals, in modifying and affirming the judgment of the district court, did not pass upon the title to the surface estate.
#### GREGORY v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 27, 1951.

C. A. Denny, Greenville, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for a-ppellee.

*63CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Paul Gregory was sentenced to prison for one year on a charge of grand larceny. At the outset we are confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal because no judgment appears in the record. As stated in Lee v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 771, 218 S.W.2d 945, there is nothing from which an appeal may be prosecuted when there is no judgment in the record.

Wherefore, the appeal is dismissed.