alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4791 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4791

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Ross of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-METHYLENEBIS(2-CHLOROANILINE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4,4'-               Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          methylenebis(2-                                                   12/31/2015
                          chloroaniline),
                          (CAS No. 101-14-
                          4) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2921.59.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Robert E. Zamzok et al., Respondents, v 650 Park Avenue Corporation et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant. 67th and Park Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.), entered on or about May 20, 1989, which denied the motion of third-party defendant and the cross motion of defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiffs-appellants to dismiss the complaint, and which granted plaintiffs-respondents leave to amend their complaint as directed in a prior order of the court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A prior action between the same parties or their predeces*253sors in interest resulted in an order embodying a stipulation of settlement. Pursuant to said order and stipulation of settlement, plaintiffs executed releases and agreed that no further action would be brought against defendant 650 Park Avenue Corporation or third-party defendant’s predecessor, with respect to noise levels, "unless there is a substantial increase in the noise level above the noise level as set forth in plaintiff’s acoustical report”. Furthermore, the court directed that any issue relating to "substantial increase in the noise level” would be resolved by submission to the American Arbitration Association. In the instant verified complaint, plaintiffs seek further damages, resulting from the noise emanating from the garage. The Park Avenue defendants and Cross & Brown answered and commenced a third-party action against 67th and Park Corp.

The motion and cross motion to dismiss, based upon the 1978 order, were properly denied. Plaintiff adequately stated a cause of action in his amended verified complaint, as supplemented by plaintiff’s affidavit in which he alleged noise levels above the range set forth in the acoustical report. That plaintiff did not specify audiometric reading levels sufficient to establish the claim is irrelevant for the sole criterion on such a motion when evidentiary material has not been considered is whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, not whether he has one. *(Guggenheimer v Ginzburg,*43 NY2d 268, 275.) Collateral estoppel is inapplicable, since the instant action presents an issue as to whether noise levels have substantially increased over a level fixed in the prior order.

Further, we find that the delay of *AVz*years in the assertion of the defense of arbitration is inconsistent with that right and in the instant case constituted a waiver of such right *(see, De Sapio v Kohlmeyer,*35 NY2d 402, 405). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-2104; MM Docket No. 00-109; RM-9899] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document allots Channel 291A to Ravenwood, Missouri, in response to a petition filed by Clyde John Holdsworth and Ronald G. Fillbeck d/b/a R.C. Broadcasting Company.                         *See*65 FR 41036, July 3, 2000. The coordinates for Channel 291A at Ravenwood are 40-21-09 NL and 94-40-16 WL. A filing window for Channel 291A at Ravenwood will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.                     

# DATES:

Effective October 30, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-109, adopted September 6, 2000, and released September 15, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Florida, is amended by adding Ravenwood, Channel 291A. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-24647 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries* of NCL Corporation Ltd.

The following are the
significant subsidiaries of NCL Corporation Ltd. as of December 31, 2009



|                                   |  |                                              
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|Arrasas Limited                    |  | Isle of Man                                  
|NCL International, Ltd.            |  | Bermuda                                      
|NCL America Holdings, LLC          |  | Delaware                                     
|Norwegian Dawn Limited             |  | Isle of Man                                  
|Norwegian Star Limited             |  | Isle of Man                                  
|Norwegian Jewel Limited            |  | Isle of Man                                  
|Norwegian Sun Limited              |  | Bermuda                                      
|Norwegian Spirit, Ltd.             |  | Bermuda                                      
|F3 Two, Ltd.                       |  | Bermuda                                      
|NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. d/b/a NCL       |  | Bermuda                                      
|NCL America LLC                    |  | Delaware                                     
|Pride of America Ship Holding, LLC |  | Delaware                                     
|Pride of Hawaii, LLC               |  | Delaware                                     
|Maritime Investment, LLC           |  | Delaware                                     



|* | Unless otherwise noted, each subsidiary listed under this heading is, directly or indirectly, wholly-owned by NCL Corporation Ltd.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 5.1





Mark D. Fischer

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Phone:  (212) 381-3509

Fax:  (212) 381-3993

Email: markfischer@pvh.com












September 10, 2012








Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, DC 20549




Gentlemen:




I refer to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “Registration Statement”) filed on even date by PVH Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of up to an aggregate of 4,503,050 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”), to be issued in connection with the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).




I have made such examination as I have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.  Based upon such examination, it is my opinion, that, when the Registration Statement has become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and when the shares of Common Stock to be issued are sold and paid for in the manner described in the Plan, the Common Stock so issued will have been validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.




My opinion is limited to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.  This opinion is given as of the date hereof and I assume no obligation to advise you of changes that may hereafter be brought to my attention.




I hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.




Very truly yours,





/s/ Mark D. Fischer





Mark D. Fischer
The Decennial Census occurs every 10 years, in years ending in zero, to count the population and housing units for the entire United States. Its primary purpose is to provide the population counts that determine how seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are apportioned. more... Other Resources Census 2000 Gateway • Count Question Resolution

(PDF - 45 KB) •

Census 2000 Notes and Errata

(PDF - 2.2 MB) •

Census 2000 SF 1 - SF 4 Data

Corrections in American FactFinder •

Download Center • Download data sets via FTP •

1990 DECENNIAL Load Query | Clear all selections

Census 2000 1990 Census

Explain Table and Map Formats

The letters PDF or symbol indicate a document is in the Portable Docume nt Format (PDF). To view the file you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader, which is available for free from the Adobe web site. 

### n m l k j i 1990 Summary Tape File 1 (STF 1) - 100-Percent data Summary Tape File 1 (STF 1) contains 100% data on age, race, sex, marital status, Hispanic origin, household type and relationship, occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, units in structure, contract rent, meals included in rent, value, and number of rooms.



### n m l k j 1990 Summary Tape File 3 (STF 3) - Sample data Summary Tape File 3 (STF 3) contains sample data weighted to represent total population for 34 population items and 27 housing items and 100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts for total persons and total housing units. Select from the follo w Detailed Tables Geographic Compari s Quick Tables Thematic Maps Reference Maps
Enter a table numbe r List all tables List all maps
A bout this data set Technical Document a 

## Pa g e 1 of 1 United States - Data Sets - American FactFinde r

6/12/2011 htt p ://factfinder.census. g ov/servlet/DatasetMainPa g eServlet?

_ ds

_ name=DEC

_ 1990

_ STF1

...
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Brown, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered April 25, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds was properly denied without a hearing, since it was clear from the court file and the parties’ papers that a significant portion of the nearly two-year delay between the filing of the felony complaint and the commencement of the trial was excludable, and the defendant failed to establish that the unexcludable delay was in excess of the statutory period *(see, People v Lomax,*50 NY2d 351; *cf., People v Santos,*68 NY2d 859; *People v Berkowitz,*50 NY2d 333; *People v Montes,*151 AD2d 700). We note that during the period in question, the defendant absconded twice, used two aliases, was incarcerated under one of the aliases, and was the subject of two separate bench warrants.

Although it was error for the court to use the phrase "reasonable certainty” in its charge on reasonable doubt *(see, People v La Rosa,*112 AD2d 954), this error is not preserved for appellate review. In any event, neither the single instance in which that phrase was used, nor the other claimed imper*347fections, diluted the effect of the charge, which repeatedly and accurately conveyed to the jury the concept of reasonable doubt *(see, People v Canty,*60 NY2d 830; *People v Malloy,*55 NY2d 296, *cert denied*459 US 847; *People v Baucom,*154 AD2d 688).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
31 reversible error. Appellant asks that the trial court be ordered to render him a new

trial and remedy the s e error s

.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Darrell J. O’Neal

Darrell J. O’Neal

Law Office of Darrell J. O’Neal

TN State Bar No 20927

2129 Winchester Road

Memphis, TN 38116

(901) 345

- 8009 office

(901) 345

- 8014 fax

domemphislaw@aol.com

/s/Melvin Houston

Melvin Houston

Melvin Houston & Associates

TX Stat e Bar No. 00793987

1776 Yorktown, Suite 350

Houston, TX 77056

Tel: (713) 212

- 0600

Fax: (713) 212

- 0290

mhouston@gotellmel.com

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a t rue and correct copy of the above an d foregoing

Appellant’s Brief via this court’s electronic filing system pursuant to T.R.AP. Rule

9 upon the following on February 25 , 201 5 :

Andrew K. York

Gray Reed & McGraw

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 ACCEPTED

06-14-00102-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

3/3/2015 6:08:08 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK32 Dallas, TX 75201

( 201) 654

- 4135

(214) 953

- 1332 fax

dyork@grayreed.com

Counsel for Lucien Tujague, Jr.and

Dominion Gas Holdings LP

Bryan Stevens

Hallet & Perrin PC

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste 2400

Dallas, TX 75202

BStevens@hallettperri n.com

Counsel for Shuk Holdings LLC and

IDT Energy Inc

Mark J. Johansen

Rafeal C. Rodriguez

Gruber Hurst Johansen Hail Shank LLP

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste 2500

Dallas, TX 75202

mjohansen@ghjhlaw.com

rrodriquez@ghjhlaw.com

Counsel for Alex Rodriguez

Resp ectfully submitted,

/s/Melvin Houston

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(3), I hereby certify that this

brief contains 4994 words (excluding the caption, table of contents, table of

authorities, signature, proo f of service, certification, and certificate of compliance).

This is a computer

- generated document created in Microsoft Word, using 14

- point

typeface for all text, except for footnotes which are in 12

- point typeface. In making33 this certificate of complianc e, I am relying on the word count provided by the

software used to prepare the document.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Melvin Houston
Exhibit 99.1





PVH Corp. Appoints Jesper Andersen to Its Board of Directors





NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--November 13, 2024-- PVH Corp. [NYSE: PVH] today announced the appointment of Jesper Andersen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the LEGO Group, to its Board of Directors, effective immediately. He has also been appointed to the Board’s Audit and Risk Management Committee.





Stefan Larsson, PVH Chief Executive Officer, said, “Jesper is a seasoned global leader with deep experience driving sustainable, brand-accretive growth at one of the most iconic, high-performing consumer brands in the world. Jesper’s very strong financial acumen, omnichannel experience and data-driven approach make him an excellent addition to our Board of Directors as we pursue our vision to build Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger into two of the most desirable lifestyle brands in the world.”





Andersen was named Chief Financial Officer of the LEGO Group in October 2020. He has played a critical role in the LEGO Group’s growth over the last four years, including identifying new opportunities to expand the relevance and reach of the portfolio. Andersen brings more than 25 years of global leadership experience at other major consumer brands, having served as Chief Financial Officer at Upfield and Beiersdorf, as well as two decades in finance leadership roles at Colgate-Palmolive in Europe, Asia and North America.





“Jesper’s strong performance track record driving strategic growth for global consumer brands will play an important role as we navigate PVH’s next growth chapter,” said Michael Calbert, PVH Board Chair. “We are thrilled to welcome Jesper to the Board of Directors as we build brand desirability around the world and create long-term value for our stakeholders.”





“It is an honor to join PVH’s Board of Directors at such an exciting time for the company,” said Andersen. “I have long admired its two iconic brands and look forward to working closely with the Board, Stefan and the entire management team to drive the next level of PVH+ Plan execution.”





For more information about PVH Corp.'s Board of Directors and corporate governance practices, visit https://www.pvh.com/investor-relations/governance .





About PVH Corp.





PVH is one of the world’s largest fashion companies, connecting with consumers in over 40 countries. Our global iconic brands include Calvin Klein  and  TOMMY HILFIGER . Our 140-plus-year history is built on the strength of our brands, our team and our commitment to drive fashion forward for good. That’s the Power of Us. That’s the Power of PVH.





Follow us on Instagram and LinkedIn .





Investor Contact:


Sheryl Freeman


InvestorRelations@pvh.com





Media Contact:


Alison Rappaport


Communications@pvh.com





Source: PVH Corp.
#### Hiram BAILEY, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 18, 1953.

Dan Jack Combs, Francis M. Burke, Pikeville, for appellant.

J. 3⁄4. Buckman, Atty. Gen., H. D. Reed, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court wherein movant was convicted of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in local option territory and his punishment fixed at a fine of $40 and sixty days in jail.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.