alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

                              Consent of Accountant

                               GEORGE STEWART, CPA
                     2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-G
                                SEATTLE, WA 91844
                    (206) 328-8554        FAX (206) 328-0383





To Whom it May Concern:

The  firm  of  George  Stewart,  Certified  Public  Accountant  consents  to the
inclusion  of my report June 13, 2001,  on the  Financial  Statements  of Medina
Coffee,  Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and May 31, 2001,  in any filings that are
necessary  now or in the  near  future  with the U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


The  Financial  Statements  for the five months ended May 31, 2001 were audited.
This is the clarification requested in the SEC letter of August 14, 2001.


Very truly yours,


/s/ George Stewart
--------------------
George Stewart, CPA
August 20, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Part 1845 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 

# ACTION:

Interim rule: correction. 

# SUMMARY:

This is a correction of the amendatory language of item 2 of the Property Reporting Requirements interim rule published September 11, 2000. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 11, 2000 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Celeste Dalton, NASA, Office of Procurement, Contract Management Division (Code HK), 202-358-1645. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## A. Background 

                    The amendatory language at item 2 of the interim rule on Property Reporting Requirements published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 11, 2000 (65 FR 54813—54816) incorrectly identified all of subpart 1845.71 as being revised. The effect of the error was the inadvertent omission of section 1845.7102, Instructions for preparing DD Form 1419. This correction revises the amendatory language for item 2 to indicate that only sections 1845.7101, 1845.7101-1, 1845.7101-2, 1875.7101-3, 1845.7101-4, and 1845.7101-5 are revised.                 

# List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1845

      - Government Procurement

Tom Luedtke,

Associate Administrator for Procurement. 

Accordingly, 48 CFR Part 1845 is amended as follows: 

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 1845 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1). 

2. Correct item 2 in the first column of page 54814, by deleting the Table of Contents and revising the amendatory instruction to read as follows: 

# PART 1845—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 

2. In subpart 1845.71 revise sections 1845.7101, 1845.7101-1, 1845.7101-2, 1875.7101-3, 1845.7101-4, and 1845.7101-5 to read as follows: 

[FR Doc. 00-24812 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61122 Summary Calendar

KLODIAN HOXHA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A96 029 325

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Albanian citizen Klodian Hoxha petitions for review of the decision of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Hoxha’s petition is denied. Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Immigration Judge (IJ) that Hoxha has no well-founded fear of persecution should he be returned to Albania. See Faddoul v.
INS , 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). Hoxha’s testimony established that he personally was briefly detained during anNo. 05-61122 -2- election dispute and was verbally threatened by police and members of the Socialist Party. However, he was not physically injured and evidently was free to move around the country to work and take care of his grandmother. It was unclear from Hoxha’s testimony whether his grandfather, brother, and sister were victims of the Socialist Party or of criminals. The IJ did not err by relying on materials prepared by the State Department when making the determination whether Hoxha should be granted asylum. See Rojas v. INS , 937 F.3d 186, 190 n.1 (5th Cir. 1991). Those materials indicated that the Socialist Party is not engaged in persecution of its opponents and that Albania is a functioning democracy with competitive elections that are relatively fair and free. However, the country has chronic crime issues, and local police evidently engage in brutal conduct. Moreover, Hoxha’s testimony indicated that he could relocate within Albania if necessary. See LopezGomez v. Ashcroft , 263 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 2001).
PETITION DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACOACO DIVISION

PARKERVISION, INC.

vs.

INTEL CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00108-ADA

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY Discovery HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

DISCOVERY HEARING by Private Zoomoom on November 02, 2022 at 03:30 PM.

set

IT 26th day of October, 2022.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 170 Filed 10/26/22 Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION

DAEDALUS BLUE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and 

DJI EUROPE B.V.,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00073-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE OMNIBUS ORDER

Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and having heard argument from the 

parties, the Court now ORDERS as follows:

1. Daedalus Blue’s Motions in Limine regarding IPR evidence (Dkt. Nos. 138-139) have 

not yet been ruled on, and are taken under advisement. 

2. DJI’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 99) is DENIED.

3. Daedalus Blue’s Daubert motion regarding Mr. Bakewell (Dkt. No. 97) is DENIED.

4. DJI’s Daubert motion regarding Mr. Pellegrino (Dkt. No. 101) is GRANTED. See

Dkt. No. 171.

5. Daedalus Blue’s Daubert motion regarding Dr. Nourbakhsh (Dkt. No. 96) is 

DENIED.

6. DJI’s motion to strike the supplemental expert report of Mr. Pellegrino (Dkt. No. 98)

is GRANTED. See Dkt. No. 171.

7. DJI’s motion to strike opinions and testimony of Mr. Myers on infringement theories 

based on Litchi and doctrine of equivalents (Dkt. No. 100) is GRANTED.

Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA-DTG Document 172 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 2
2

8. DJI’s Motions in Limine #1-3, 8, and 10 (Dkt. No. 137) are GRANTED.

9. DJI’s Motions in Limine #4-7 and 9 have been resolved by stipulation, and are 

therefore MOOT.

SIGNED this 25th day of February, 2022.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00073-ADA-DTG Document 172 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4855 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4855

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Diaminodecane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Diaminodecane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIAMINODECANE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Diaminodecane) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4628 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4628

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interest Rate Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
        ``2012'' and inserting ``2013''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``2012'' and inserting 
        ``2013''.

SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO ACT OF 2010.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4628

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E L UI S AV I L A A VI L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70221 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 854- 047 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e L ui s A vi l aA vi l a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED FEB 23 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS/ Res ea r ch 08- 70221 2 r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, and r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of

l aw , i nc l udi ng c l a i m s of due pr oc e s s vi ol a t i ons due t o i ne f f e c t i ve a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d 78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng A vi l a ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n, because the B IA consi dere d the evi dence he subm i tt ed and act ed w i thi n i t s broad d is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w arr an t r e o p e n in g . Se e Si n gh v . I

NS , 29 5 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( T he B IA ’ s deni alof a m o tio n to r e o p e n s h a ll b e r e v e r s e dif it is “arb itr ary , irr a tio n a l, o rc o n tr aryto l aw . ”) . W e a g r e e w ith th e B I A ’s c o n c lu s io n th at A v ilaf a ile dto e s tab lis h th a t h is f orm e rr e pr e s e nt a t i ve ’ s c onduc tr e s ul t e d i n pr e j udi c e , and the r e f

or e hi s i ne f

f e c t i ve a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im f

a ils . See M

oh am m ed , 400 F . 3d a t793 ( t o pr e va i l on an in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im , ap e titio n e rm u s t d e m o n s tr a te prej ud i ce ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                            2,424,453
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,590,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                        447,856
<INVENTORY>                                         551,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,092,724
<PP&E>                                              486,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                      124,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,720,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,709,182
<BONDS>                                             770,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              20
<COMMON>                                          1,310,840
<OTHER-SE>                                        5,929,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,720,369
<SALES>                                           2,226,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,293,512
<CGS>                                             1,484,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,369,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     77,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   19,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (648,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (648,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (648,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.06)


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

365 

CA 10-02091 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

MARGARITA ZULEY, M.D., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ELIZABETH WENDE BREAST CARE, LLC, WENDE 

LOGAN-YOUNG, M.D., STAMATIA DESTOUNIS, M.D., 

PHILIP MURPHY, M.D., POSY SEIFERT, D.O., AND 

PATRICIA SOMERVILLE, M.D., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS F. KNAB OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS ELIZABETH WENDE BREAST CARE, LLC, STAMATIA

DESTOUNIS, M.D., PHILIP MURPHY, M.D., POSY SEIFERT, D.O., AND 

PATRICIA SOMERVILLE, M.D. 

BOYLAN, BROWN, CODE, VIGDOR & WILSON, LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID K. HOU OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT WENDE LOGAN-YOUNG, M.D. 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD W. O’BRIEN, JR., OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered May 14, 2010. The order denied in

part defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the

complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|New Mexico--East Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|New Mexico--East Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 97     | 156   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 91     | 161    | 146    | 133    | 142    | 171    | 159    | 147    | 136    | 149   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 180    | 185    | 232    | 304    | 460    | 550    | 797    | 1,565  | W      | 2,055 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,764  | 2,112  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 25, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0993 Lower Tribunal No. F08-8259

________________ 

### Pleadro J. Scott, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Pleadro J. Scott, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before MILLER, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See George v. State, 278 So. 3d 770, 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (noting “similar challenges have been rejected in the past” and explaining that “[u]nless and until [Appellant] obtains a recovery and the Department’s attempt to use the lien as a set off is either actually occurring or imminent, his request for a ruling on this point is little more than an unauthorized request for an advisory opinion”) (internal quotations and citations omitted).