alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 16, 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01328

- CR

JERRY LYNN TURNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Ju dici al District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 070819

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant ’ s April 1 4, 2020 second motion for extension

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the mo tion and ORDER appellant ’ s brie f du e

on or before April 20 , 20 20

.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Eastern Air Lines 

DOT Passenger Manifest Submission

Final DOT rule on Passenger Manifest Information

Eastern Air Lines, a Supplemental FAR 121 Carrier, will comply with the procedures for 

collecting, compiling and transmitting the names of passenger contact details for U.S. citizen 

passengers on covered flight segments after an air disaster as defined in 14 C.F.R. Part 243.

If any questions should be raised regarding these procedures you may contact Eastern Air Lines,

Director of Safety and Security.

Statement on Eastern Air Line Air Passenger Manifest Information

Eastern Air Lines will use forms to be completed by all U.S. citizen passengers on covered 

segments. It will collect, or cause to be collected, the full name for each passenger who is a US 

citizen. US citizens who do not provide this information will not be boarded. Eastern will also 

solicit, or cause to be solicited, a name and telephone number of a contact from each such 

passenger.

Eastern Air Lines will store the forms from the moment the U.S. passenger embarks on the 

flight until the U.S. citizen disembarks from the flight. It will destroy all completed forms from a 

flight after confirmation from the arrival station that all passengers have disembarked.

Eastern Air Lines will, immediately after learning of an aviation disaster on a covered flight, 

inform the Managing Director of Overseas Citizen Services, U.S. Department of State, on the 

office’s 24 hour telephone number. Eastern will then transmit as quickly as possible, but not 

later than three hours after learning of the disaster, a complete and accurate compilation of the 

information collected from all U.S. citizen passengers. Upon request, Eastern also will transmit 

a complete and accurate compilation of the information collected from all U.S. citizen 

passengers to the Director, Transportation Disaster Assistance Division (formerly Family 

Support Services), National Transportation Safety Board.

The Eastern Air Lines contact for this plan, the Director of Safety and Security, will be available 

at any time Eastern is operating a covered flight segment and can be reached through specific 

phone numbers.
### 07/19/201 0 MO N10:4 9 FAX81 7 22 2 509 2 regiona l counse l

& U.S . Deportmen t o f Tronsportotio n Federa l Aviatio n AdmirastroHo n Southvves t Regio n Ar1<ansas , Louisiana . Ne wMexico , Oklahom a Texa s Offic e o f Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 260 1 Mcacha m Blvd . For t Worth . T

X 7613 7 (617 ) 22Z-509 9 (817 ) 222-5945/509 2 FA X UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C .

I n th e Matte rof : Freedo m Airiine s *

* FA A Docke t No . CP09SW000 5 FA A Cas e No . 2008SW07008 0 AL J Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n MOTIO N FO R CONTINUANC E COME S NO Wth e Administrato r an dfiles thi s Motio nfo r Continuanc e an da s caus e thereo f

woul dsho w th e following . 

### t . A hearin g dat e o f

Augus t 11,1 2 an d13 , 2010 , ha s bee nse t fo r th e abov e c£Lptione

d matter . 

## n . Th e Respondent , Freedo mAirlines , i s asubsidiar y o f Mes aAi r

Group , Tnc , whic hfile daPetitio nfo r Bankruptc y o nJanuar y 5 , 2010 .

IT. Th e partie s ar e i nth e proces s o f settlin g th e cas e bu t

mus t hav e th e approva l o f

th e Bankrupt y Trustee . Considerin g th e extenuatin g circumstances , acontinuanc e i n thes e case s woul db e i n th e bes t interes t o f al l partie s concerned .

### 07/19/201 0 MO

N10:4 9 FAI81 7 22 2 509 2 regiona l counse l @1003/00 4

WHEREFORE , B Y REASO NO FTH EFOREGOING , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio nhereb y pray s tha t th e Motio nfo r

Continuanc e b e granted . Respectfull y Submitte d LYNETT EWOR D Regiona l Counse l Soudiwes t

Regio n By : "Annjen^t

^hennaul t 

### Attorn 4 817-222^507 1

### 07/19/201 0 MO

N10:4 9 FA

X81 7 22 2 509 2 regiona l counse l S004/00 4

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e origina l an don e cop y o f th e foregoin g Motio nfo r Continuanc e ha s bee nmaile dJul y 19 , 2010 , b y Certifie dMai l - Retur nReceip t Requeste dan dfax to : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t BuUding—Suit e 2W100 0 I hereb y certif

y tha t acop y o f

th e foregoin g Motio nfo r Continuance , ha s bee nmaile d Jul y 19 , 2010 , b y Certifie dMail-Retur nReceip t Requested , an dfax t o th e following : Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearing , .M-20 , Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Christophe r

Pappaioano u Director , Lega l Affair s Mes aAi r Grou p 41 0 Nort h44 * Street , Suit e 70 0 Phoenix , A Z8500 8 Tut^^^^^A* ^ Marquift aRobinso n Paralega l Specialis t
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIFCO Industries, Inc. ("Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Jeffrey P. Gotschall,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Jeffrey P. Gotschall
                                                ------------------------
                                                    Jeffrey P. Gotschall
                                                    Chairman of the Board and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 4, 2003

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to SIFCO Industries, Inc. and will
be retained by SIFCO Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       1
|   | Exhibit      32.01 |
|--------|--------------------|

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      4, 2009    |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
| /s/William      B. Timmerman              |   |
| William      B. Timmerman                 |   |
| Chairman      of the Board, President and |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer              |   |
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24618]

[[Page 57608]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Notice; 65 FR 55980, 
September 15, 2000.

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, 
September 19, 2000.

Change in the meeting: The following topic was added to the open 
portion of the meeting:
     Extension of the Comment Period for the Proposed Capital 
Regulation.
    The Board determined that agency business required the addition of 
this item on less than seven days notice to the public and that on 
earlier notice of this change in the subject matter of the matter was 
practicable.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.

James L. Bothwell,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 00-24618 Filed 9-20-00; 4:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
```
#### James P. Hughes et al., Respondents, v Gene Peters, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cheeseman, J.), entered November 9, 1989 in Albany County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiffs, and granted a new trial unless defendant stipulates to an increased verdict.

The injuries of plaintiff James P. Hughes included a chronic posterior cervical problem, diagnosed in part as L-5 radiculopathy. He incurred protracted pain and partial disability, and wore cervical collars and a back brace for approximately four years. Under these circumstances the award of $6,500 for pain and suffering was inadequate and Supreme Court’s exercise of its discretionary power to set aside the verdict and order a new trial in the interest of justice unless defendant agreed to increase the award to $16,500 was in all respects proper *(see, Pitts v Columbus McKinnon Corp.,*75 AD2d 1002; *cf., Juiditta v Bethlehem Steel Corp.,*75 AD2d 126, 138).

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Bishop, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mirabile, J.), rendered December 20, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the lineup identification was rendered unnecessarily suggestive is without merit. The record discloses that all the lineup participants bore a sufficient resemblance to the defendant such that a substantial risk of misidentification was not presented by the identification procedure *(see, People v Stokes,*156 AD2d 401; *People v Thompson,*143 AD2d 858). In this regard, there is no requirement that a defendant in a lineup be surrounded by individuals nearly identical in appearance *(see, e.g., People v Allah,*158 AD2d 605; *People v Rodriguez,*124 AD2d 611). The hearing court, therefore, did not err in declining to suppress the eyewitness’s lineup identification.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). The jury had the opportunity to make its own determination of the fairness of the lineup identification procedure by viewing the photographs of the lineup, which were admitted into evidence, and hearing and observing several of the fillers who testified at the trial. The jury also heard the testimony of the detective who supervised the lineup and the eyewitness who made an in-court identification of the defendant. We find no basis to overturn the jury’s determination which credited the People’s *552witnesses. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 1 2294 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6 : 07

- cr - 00212

- GKS

- DAB

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (December 1, 2015) Before WILSON , JORDAN and ROSEN BAUM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Conrad Kahn , appointed counsel for Willie James Douglas , ha s filed a motion to withdraw on appeal , supported by a brief prepared pursu ant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and the district court’s denial of Douglas’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED

.

Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Appendix 7.4 

Natural Gas Production Trends 
Appendix 7.4 Natural Gas Production Trends 

The Hugoton, Panoma, Bradshaw, Greenwood, and Byerly natural gas fields in 

southwestern Kansas are part of the largest natural gas embayment in North America. 

Since 1928, Hugoton and associated gas fields in Kansas have produced over 26 trillion 

standard cubic feet (Tscf) of natural gas (1). The following map, Figure A7.4.1, shows 

locations of the gas wells currently in production, as well as locations of the natural gas 

compressor stations currently in operation in Kansas holding air permits. 

Figure A7.4.1 Natural gas Production Wells and Distribution Compressors in 

Kansas 

The Hugoton and Panoma gas fields, the largest natural gas production areas in Kansas 

(seen roughly in Figure A7.4.1 as the large cluster of wells in the southwest part of the 

State), reached their peak production in the early 1970s, with subsequent increases 

occurring during the mid-1990s (see Figures A7.4.1 and A7.4.2). Over the past decade, 

the natural gas fields have undergone steady decline in production as reservoirs 

experience lower pressures and become depleted. While further recovery of natural gas 

from the Hugoton field is expected in the future, the production rates will likely continue 

to decline, or remain steady at best, due to the increased costs associated with production 

from mature wells. 
Figure A7.4.2. Production from the Hugoton Natural Gas Field in Kansas 

0

100,000,000

200,000,000

300,000,000

400,000,000

500,000,000

600,000,000

700,000,000

800,000,000

196619681970197219741976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000200220042006

Million Cubic Feet (mcf)

Figure A7.4.3. Production from the Panoma Natural Gas Field in Kansas 

0

20,000,000

40,000,000

60,000,000

80,000,000

100,000,000

120,000,000

140,000,000

160,000,000

196619681970197219741976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000200220042006

Million Cubic Feet (mcf)
Figure A7.4.4. Declines in Reservoir Pressure in the Hugoton Natural Gas Area 

Source: Kansas Geologic Survey (Note Bcf = billion cubic feet) 

Natural gas emissions from Kansas point sources have followed the same trend, 

undergoing a steady decline over the past decade (see Figure A7.4.5). Additionally, since 

the 2002 baseline emissions inventory was developed, one of the State’s large (>500 tons 

for NOx) natural gas compressor stations has ceased production. 

Figure A7.4.5. Annual NOx emissions from Natural Gas Point Sources in Kansas

Annual Nox Emissions from Natural Gas Point Sources

in Kansas (SIC 1311, 1321, 4922, 4925) 

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

19951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Tons per year

Source: Kansas Point Source Emissions Inventory Database 
Reference 

1. Dubois, M.K., et. al. 2007. Hugoton Asset Management Project. Kansas Geological 

 Survey. http://www.kgs.ku.edu/PRS/publication/2007/OFR07_06/index.html
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4748 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4748

         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Dichlorobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Dichlorobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-DICHLOROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        p-Dichlorobenzene   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 106-46-                                                  12/31/2015
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2903.91.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Leonard S. Yurkovic, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                            /s/ Leonard S. Yurkovic
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                 Leonard S. Yurkovic
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 November 14, 2005
#### BOWLING v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 21, 1952.

T. T. Burchell, Manchester, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Justice.

Appellant, Ruford (Buck) Bowling, was indicted and convicted of the offense of robbery and his punishment was fixed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

He was charged with robbing Levi Hacker by forcibly and feloniously taking from his person $125 in money of the United States. Hacker, the prosecuting witness, testified that before he went to sleep in a bed with the appellant, the money was in his pocket but when he later awakened, the appellant had left and his money was missing. Both the appellant and Hacker were intoxicated.

 Assuming that the Commonwealth’s evidence is true, the appellant is not guilty of robbery but of larceny. To pick one’s pocket without the use of some force or violence, or putting in fear, is not robbery. Bibb v. Commonwealth, 112 S.W. 401, 33 Ky. Law Rep. 726; Jones v. Commonwealth, 115 Ky. 592, 74 S.W. 263; Dawson v. Commonwealth, 74 S.W. 701, 25 Ky. Law Rep. 5; Snyder v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W. 679, 21 Ky. Law Rep. 1538. Hacker was in an intoxicated slumber and consequently was never put in any fear and there is no evidence that any force or violence was used upon his person to relieve him of his money.

The Commonwealth contends that if the offense be larceny and not robbery, the error was corrected by giving an instruction on larceny, since larceny is a degree of the offense of robbery. But the jury expressly found the appellant guilty of robbery, a graver offense than larceny. Sections 262, 263, Criminal Code of Practice; Commonwealth v. Prewitt, 82 Ky. 240, 6 Ky. Law Rep. 195. Under the evidence, the appellant could be found guilty only of larceny. Other questions raised on this appeal are specifically reserved.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.