April 16, 2015

 Exemption No. 11343

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−0040

Mr. Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

The Aviation Law Firm

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, MD 21401

Dear Mr. Winton:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 8, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Woolpert, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The exemption 

would allow the petitioner to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial 

acquisitions and research.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a Skycatch.
2

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in 

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited 

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation 

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA 

finds that the relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, 

Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing 

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption No. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Woolpert, Inc. is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

§§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 

91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the 

extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. 

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Woolpert, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the operator.
3

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the Skycatch when 

weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other 

aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must 

be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 
4

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the 

operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS 

Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or 

revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all

potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 
5

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.
6

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.
7

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on April, 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

WOOLPERT, INC.

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATION

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF THE

SKYCATCH UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Submitted on January 8, 2015

GREGORY S. WINTON, ESQ.

JARED M. ALLEN, ESQ.

THE AVIATION LAW FIRM

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294-8550

Fax: (866) 568-9886

Attorneys for Petitioner
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................3

SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER .................................................4

BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................5

BASIS FOR PETITION ......................................................................................................5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.................................................................7

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH WOOLPERT, INC.

SEEKS EXEMPTION ...................................................................................................7

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF WOOLPERT, INC. SEEKS AND THE REASON 

WOOLPERT, INC. SEEKS THE RELIEF .................................................................11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING WOOLPERT, INC.'S REQUEST WOULD BE 

IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST .....................................................................................13

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT 

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY..............................................................................17

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER..........31

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE 

TO SUPPORT WOOLPERT, INC.'S REQUEST.......................................................31

CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................32
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle 

C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VO Visual Observer

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing 
4

SUMMARY

Woolpert, Inc. seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), 

to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Woolpert, Inc. to operate an 

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions 

and research over certain rural areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Woolpert, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Woolpert”) is a 103 year-old design, geospatial 

and infrastructure management firm with a long and well-recognized history in mapping and 

surveying. Woolpert excels in the collection of aerial imagery from manned, fixed-wing aircraft 

for the purpose of making highly accurate aerial maps for a range of clients and various 

applications. In addition to operating a fleet of conventional fixed-wing aircraft, Woolpert has 

recently acquired a Skycatch unmanned aircraft system (hereinafter “Skycatch UAS”). As set 

forth in this Petition, Woolpert seeks to commercially operate its Skycatch UAS over certain 

rural areas of the United States for the purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions and research, 

continuing an established legacy that has always sought the highest standards of operations and 

safety.

Woolpert has previously received two Grants of Exemption (Exemption Nos. 11111 and 

11114) from the FAA concerning operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National 

Airspace System (NAS).
5

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft System: Skycatch UAS

Woolpert seeks an exemption to operate the Woolpert Skycatch UAS for compensation 

or hire within the NAS. The Skycatch UAS is comprised of a vertical takeoff and landing 

(VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) and a transportable Ground Control Station (GCS). The 

Skycatch UA has a maximum gross weight of approximately 6.6 pounds, while having a 

diameter of 30 inches, height of 20 inches, and maximum speed of 50 mph (43.4 knots). The 

Skycatch UA is equipped with four propellers, each being driven by a Lithium Polymer battery 

powered electric motor.

The Skycatch UA that will be operated by Woolpert will be registered in accordance with 

49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and 

marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Woolpert, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the 

provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 

hereby petitions the Administrator to operate the Skycatch UAS in the National Airspace System

(NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Woolpert’s operation of the Skycatch UAS meets the 

conditions of Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 
6

Accordingly, Woolpert requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for 

maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Woolpert submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety 

will be ensured. Woolpert will use its authorized technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. Furthermore, Woolpert will document 

and maintain all maintenance records for the Skycatch UAS. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot 

privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Woolpert to the extent necessary to 

allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot certificate and a third-class airman 

medical certificate, and who has completed the Skycatch UAS training and currency 

requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations. Woolpert submits that the 

conditions and limitations set forth herein will ensure the safety of the NAS, as well as the safety 

of persons or property on the ground.

Woolpert seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because 

the Skycatch UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 

21, Subpart H. As such, Woolpert submits that it will ensure that the Skycatch UAS is in an 

airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the 

Skycatch Flight Manual, and that the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight.

 Woolpert also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled

Altimeter Settings, as the Skycatch UA will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. 

However, altitude information of the Skycatch UA will be provided to the PIC via Global 
7

Positioning System (GPS) equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which 

downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude 

information, combined with Woolpert’s operation of the Skycatch UA within visual line of sight, 

at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121.

Additionally, Woolpert seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b),

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Woolpert submits that safety will not be 

affected by terminating flights of the battery powered Skycatch UA after 30 minutes of 

continuous flight, which would allow for five minutes of battery power remaining.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Woolpert provides the following information in 

support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner is:

Woolpert, Inc.

4454 Idea Center Blvd.

Dayton, Ohio 45430

The point of contact for this Petition and specific contact information is as follows:

Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

The Aviation Law Firm

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294-8550 | Fax: (866) 568-9886

Email: Greg@aviationlawexperts.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Woolpert Seeks Exemption.

1. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) 

And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, 

subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:
8

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command

(PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or

hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in

connection with any business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of 

that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 

nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, 

the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure 

airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure; 

4. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), 

states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering 

wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of 

intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 

minutes.
9

5. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a). 

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following:

Each owner or operator of an aircraft—

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall 

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have 

discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1).

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, 

rebuilding, or alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this 

chapter[.]

7. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) 

And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft 

unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had --

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been 

approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 

21 of this chapter.

8. Woolpert Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) 

And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the 

following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered 

owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph 

(b) of this section:
10

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 

100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, 

for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance 

of an aircraft. The records must include--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work 

performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return 

to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and 

appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required 

to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last 

inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances 

are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives 

including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and 

revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date 

when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration 

to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the 

work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this 

chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for 

return to service.
11

C. The Extent Of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks Relief 

From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: 

Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot 

certificate and a third-class airman medical certificate, and who has completed the Skycatch 

UAS training and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for 

compensation.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state 

that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if - (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Woolpert submits that an equivalent level of safety will be 

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the Skycatch UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, through the Skycatch UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is 

able to safely operate the Skycatch UAS in a manner consistent with the operations 

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as 

well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Further, Woolpert submits that all flights of the Skycatch UAS, conducted by the PIC 

pursuant to the grant of this Petition - (1) will be incidental to Woolpert’s business; and (2) will

not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.
12

2. Extent of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent 

required to allow Woolpert to determine that the Skycatch UAS is in an airworthy condition

prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the Skycatch Flight Manual, 

and that the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight.

Woolpert seeks the requested relief because the Skycatch UAS does not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Woolpert 

will ensure that the Skycatch UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon its compliance with 

the operating documents (i.e., the Skycatch Flight Manual) prior to every flight, and as stated in 

the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121 entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight 

operations of the Skycatch UAS, which utilizes GPS equipment and a radio communications 

telemetry data link to downlink altitude information to the PIC from the UA to the GCS. As 

more fully set forth below, safety will be maintained as a result of the Skycatch UA’s altitude 

readout via GPS equipment, and Woolpert’s operation of the Skycatch UA within visual line of 

sight, at or below 400 feet AGL.

4. Extent Of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks Relief 

From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is 

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered Skycatch UA during 

daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR)

conditions, to continue for a total duration of 30 minutes, which will ensure that the UA will land
13

with five minutes of battery power remaining. Woolpert seeks the requested relief because

without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered

Skycatch UA will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial acquisition and research flight 

operations that Woolpert proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the Skycatch UAS, the 

Skycatch Flight Manual, and Woolpert’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Woolpert

will safely operate the battery powered Skycatch UA during daylight hours in VFR conditions,

for a total flight duration of 30 minutes, landing with five minutes of battery power remaining.

5. Extent Of Relief Woolpert Seeks And The Reason Woolpert Seeks Relief 

From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 

91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only 

apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Woolpert requests relief from these Sections 

because the Skycatch UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate. As set forth more fully

below, the Skycatch UAS meets the conditions of Section 333 of the FMRA for operation 

without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Woolpert will use authorized technicians to 

perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. Furthermore, 

Woolpert will document and maintain all maintenance records for the Skycatch UAS. 

D. The Reasons Why Granting Woolpert’s Request Would Be In The Public 

Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Woolpert to

safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial acquisitions and research over rural areas of 

the United States, commercially, in support of government entities, agriculture, scientific studies, 

wildlife monitoring, forestry operations, and the oil and gas industries. Additionally, use of the 
14

Skycatch UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant 

benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Woolpert’s proposed operation of the Skycatch

UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues. 

1. The Public Will Benefit From The Aerial Acquisition And Research 

Performed.

Woolpert submits this Petition to commercially operate the Skycatch UAS and perform 

aerial acquisition and research throughout rural areas of the United States, in support of 

government entities, agriculture, scientific studies, wildlife monitoring, forestry operations,

mining, and the oil and gas industries. The Skycatch UAS will provide safe, efficient, and 

economical aerial acquisition and research operations to further each of these fields, all of which 

are critical to the well-being of the general public.

The specific operations that Woolpert will perform with the Skycatch UAS demonstrate 

how the requested exemption will directly benefit the above-referenced industries and the public. 

In agriculture, the aerial acquisition performed by the Skycatch UAS will be used to predict and 

increase crop yields, as well as for the research and prevention of crop disease. In the oil and gas 

industry, the Skycatch UAS will be used to aid in facility inspections, survey and plan new 

worksites, conduct volumetric analysis, and perform right of way analysis. The Skycatch UAS 

will also further environmental management by researching invasive species, mapping 

deforestation, and surveying point source pollution.

2. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The Skycatch UA is battery powered and serves as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the 

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use 
15

of a Skycatch UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air 

pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, 

congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The 

Skycatch UA does not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned 

aircraft conducting aerial survey missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by 

air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight 

operations. 

3. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The Skycatch

UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the Skycatch UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated 

during traditional aerial survey flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the 

Skycatch UAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious 

alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion twin engine aircraft that are 

typically utilized for aerial acquisitions, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of 

leaded aviation fuel. The Skycatch UA, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, 

also eliminates noise pollution, as the UA is propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather 

than an internal combustion engine.

By using the Skycatch UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and 

property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft 

flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of 

flightcrew members located onboard the aircraft, the Skycatch UA (weighing approximately 6.6

pounds at its maximum gross weight with a diameter of 30 inches, and with no fuel on board), has 
16

less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, 

compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct aerial acquisitions (weighing approximately 

6,500 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 40 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 

180 gallons).

4. Performing Aerial Acquisition Operations With The Skycatch UAS 

Will Benefit The Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the Skycatch UAS is also an economical 

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct aerial acquisitions. As such, operation of the 

Skycatch UAS will allow United States based companies, like Woolpert, to remain competitive 

and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel 

and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded 

aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in 

order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered Skycatch UAS is one such 

technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned 

aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned 

aircraft. 

By operating the Skycatch UAS, companies such as Woolpert can remain competitive 

and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which 

will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of 

U.S. companies, through commercial use of the Skycatch UAS, provides a stable workforce that 

increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows 

companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the 

United States and abroad. 
17

5. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for 

decades, Woolpert’s proposed operation of the Skycatch UAS will not implicate any privacy 

issues. Specifically, the Skycatch UAS will be operated only in rural areas, and in accordance 

with all Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. 

§ 91.119. Most significantly, the Skycatch UA will not be operated closer than 500 feet to any 

person, vessel, vehicle, or structure, which is not directly involved in the operation.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or 

How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That 

Provided By The Rule From Which Woolpert Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The Skycatch UAS Meets The Conditions Of The FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Woolpert’s operation of the Skycatch UAS meets the 

conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance 

with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification

and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the 

NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 

333 states the following, in part:

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later 

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation 

shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 

airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of 

this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under 

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--
18

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, 

weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, 

and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the 

national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness 

certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for 

the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that

certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, 

the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems 

in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Woolpert submits that the Skycatch UAS can operate safely in 

the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the 

Skycatch UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The Skycatch UAS Demonstrate Its Safe 

Characteristics. 

The Skycatch UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational 

capability. 

i. Technical Specifications Of The Skycatch UAS.

The technical specifications of the Skycatch UAS are set forth in Appendix C of the 

“Flight Manual For The Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS),” attached hereto as Exhibit 

A. Exhibit A contains proprietary information and is to be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. § 11.35(b)1.

 

1 Exhibits to this Petition contain proprietary information, and in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 

11.35(b), are not to be included in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS).
19

ii. The Skycatch UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation

Modes Enable The UAS To Remain Within A Defined 

Operational Area.

A complete description of the autonomous modes and methods of navigation of the 

Skycatch UAS is provided at pages 2, 4, 5, and 10 of the “Flight Manual For The Skycatch 

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS),” attached hereto as Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains 

proprietary information and is to be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).

iii. The Skycatch UAS Is Designed For Automatic Return To 

Launch In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or 

Navigation.

A complete description of the Skycatch UAS’s automatic return to launch function in the 

event of a break in communication or loss of telemetry data is set forth on pages 2, 9, and 10 of

the “Flight Manual For The Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS),” attached hereto as 

Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains proprietary information and is to be held in a separate file 

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).

b. Flight Operations Of The Skycatch UAS Are Limited To The 

Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With 

A Safety Observer.

Woolpert will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a valid airman medical

certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the Skycatch UAS. Additionally, a safety 

observer will assist all pilots. The PIC must complete the Skycatch UAS training and 

qualification, as set forth in the “Flight Manual For The Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft System 

(UAS),” attached hereto as Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains proprietary information and is to be 

held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).
20

c. Flights Of The Skycatch UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To 

Specific Operating Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Woolpert proposes to commercially operate the Skycatch UAS 

for the special purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions over rural areas of United States,

pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:

1) Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the following aircraft 

described in the operator’s manual which is a quad rotor aircraft weighing less than 10 

pounds: Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft System. Proposed operations of any other aircraft 

will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2) The UA may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 43.4 knots.

3) The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operator’s manual. All altitudes 

reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

4) The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

5) All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO may be used to satisfy the 

VLOS requirement, as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and 

PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. The PIC must be designated 

before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. 

6) The operator’s manual and this grant of exemption must be maintained and made 

available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the 

conditions and limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operator’s 

manual, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operator’s manual. 

The operator may update or revise its operator’s manual. It is the operator’s responsibility 

to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator 

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it 

petitions for extension or amendment. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the 

operator must petition for amendment to their exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration 

Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the 

operator’s manual. 

7) Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure it is in a condition for safe 

flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the 

aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed 
21

and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station 

must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be 

properly documented in the aircraft records. 

8) Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics (e.g. replacement of a flight critical component), must undergo a 

functional test flight in accordance with the operator’s manual. The PIC who conducts the 

functional test flight must make an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight. The 

requirements and procedures for a functional test flight and aircraft record entry must be 

added to the operator’s manual.

9) The preflight inspection must account for all discrepancies, i.e. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not covered in the relevant preflight inspection sections 

of the operator’s manual. 

10) The operator must follow the manufacturer’s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance, 

overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements, with particular attention to 

flight critical components that may not be addressed in the manufacturer’s manuals. 

11) Woolpert must carry out their maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements in accordance with the operator’s manual. Maintenance, inspection, and 

alterations must be noted in the aircraft logbook, including total flight hours, description 

of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized UAS technician or PIC

returning the UAS to service. 

12) Woolpert UAS technicians must receive and document training referenced in the 

operator’s manual. 

13) Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer System 

and Safety Bulletins. 

14) Woolpert maintenance personnel must make a record entry in the UAS logbook or 

equivalent document of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered 

between inspections. 

15) The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and a third-class airman 

medical certificate. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 

C.F.R. § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate. 

16) The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless that PIC has demonstrated,

through the training and currency requirements set forth in the operator’s manual, that the 

PIC is able to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 
22

17) UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

18) The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of the airport reference point as 

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart. The UA may not operate within 

3 nautical miles from any city or densely populated area.

19) The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

20) If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property and land, or be 

recovered in accordance with the operator’s manual. 

21) The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in 

accordance with the operator’s manual. 

22) The PIC is prohibited from beginning a UAS flight unless (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions and assuming normal cruising speed) there is enough power

to fly to the first point of intended landing prior to utilizing battery reserve power. 

23) The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under this grant of 

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request issuance of a Notice to 

Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to 

the operation. 

24) All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 47, and have identification (NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as 

large as practicable. 

25) Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or 

other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

26) The documents required under 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official 

upon request. 

27) The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned aviation 

operations and activities at all times. 

28) The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 
23

29) The UA may not be operated over congested or densely populated areas. These areas 

include but are not limited to the yellow areas depicted on World Aeronautical Charts 

(WAC), Sectional Aeronautical Charts (Sectionals), or Terminal Area Charts (TAC). 

However, aeronautical charts may not reflect pertinent local information. Ultimately, it 

is the PIC’s responsibility to maintain the minimum safe altitudes required by § 91.119. 

30) Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons (persons other than the PIC or VO), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that 

nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where 

nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, 

flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. the aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the land 

owner/controller has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety 

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and; 

c. operations near the PIC or VO do not present an undue hazard to the PIC or VO, 

per § 91.119(a). 

31) All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from 

land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained prior to the beginning 

of every flight. 

32) Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to 

the FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported 

to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the 

NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) 

And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Woolpert submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and 

(b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the Skycatch UAS unless that 

PIC has demonstrated, through the Skycatch UAS training and currency requirements, that the 

PIC is able to safely operate the Skycatch UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, 

vessels, vehicles and structures.
24

Considering Woolpert’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set 

forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of 

commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary 

to safely operate the Skycatch UAS, Woolpert submits that the additional manned airmanship 

experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills 

necessary for Woolpert’s specific proposed flight operations.

The Skycatch UAS was the subject of a previous Grant of Exemption from Section 

61.113(a) and (b). In Exemption No. 11109, the FAA granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and 

(b) concerning the operation of the Skycatch UAS by a PIC holding a private pilot certificate and 

third class airman medical certificate, based upon the following analysis:

The FAA has analyzed Clayco’s proposed operation and has determined that it does not 

differ significantly from the situation described in Grant of Exemption No. 11062 

(Astraeus Aerial). Clayco plans to operate over private property with controlled access in 

the NAS. Given: 1) the similar nature of Clayco’s proposed operating environment to that 

of Astraeus’, 2) the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements 

to those of commercial requirements [ref: Exemption No. 11062], and 3) the airmanship 

skills necessary to operate the UAS, the FAA finds that the additional manned airmanship 

experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship 

skills necessary for Clayco’s specific proposed operations. Therefore, the FAA finds that 

a PIC holding a private pilot certificate and a third-class airman medical certificate is 

appropriate for the proposed operations.

With regard to the airmanship skills necessary to operate the UAS (item #3 stated above), 

Clayco has proposed a 100 hour training program and 6 month currency requirements. 

The conditions and limitations below stipulate that Clayco may not permit any PIC to 

operate unless that PIC has demonstrated through Clayco’s training and currency 

requirements that the PIC is able to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with 

how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures.

See Exemption No. 11109 at 12.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b)

specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. 
25

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 

11136, 11138).

As in Exemption No. 11109, Woolpert will not allow any PIC to operate the Skycatch 

UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated through the Skycatch UAS training and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the Skycatch UAS in a manner consistent 

with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate 

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

A complete description of the Skycatch UAS Training and Qualification requirements is 

set forth at page 5 of the “Flight Manual For The Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS),” 

attached hereto as Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains proprietary information and is to be held in a 

separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a)

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because 

prior to every flight, Woolpert will ensure that the Skycatch UAS is in an airworthy condition 

based upon the Skycatch UAS’s compliance with its operating documents (i.e., the Skycatch 

Flight Manual), and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

The Skycatch UAS was the subject of a previous Grant of Exemption from Section 

91.7(a) (Exemption No. 11109). Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from 

Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those 

presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 

11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138).
26

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because 

the altitude information of the Skycatch UA will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and

a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active 

monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with Woolpert’s operation of 

the Skycatch UA within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of 

safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS 

equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point will 

be established and confirmed for accuracy by the UAS PIC. The Skycatch UAS was the subject 

of a previous Grant of Exemption from Section 91.121 (Exemption No. 11109). Additionally, 

the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063,

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14

C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the Skycatch UAS; (2)

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight

operations. Accordingly, Woolpert will ensure that it can safely operate the battery powered 

Skycatch UA during daylight hours, in VFR conditions, for a total flight duration of no more 

than 30 minutes, resulting in a landing with five minutes of battery power remaining. 
27

In a previous Petition for Exemption, in which an operator was utilizing a Skycatch UAS 

identical in all material respects to the Skycatch UAS Woolpert proposes to use, the FAA 

granted an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151, stating as follows:

In the event that the UAS should run out of power, it would simply land within the access 

controlled operating area. Given its weight and construction material, the risks are less 

than contemplated by the current regulation. Prior relief has been granted for manned 

aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in § 91.151 (a), including 

Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. In addition, similar UAS-specific relief has been 

granted an Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, and 10673 for daytime, Visual Flight Rules 

(VFR) conditions. The Skycatch provides a battery failsafe that commands the UA’s 

return to the launch point when critical minimum voltage is reached. The UAS batteries 

provide approximately 35 minutes of powered flight. The FAA agrees with Clayco’s 

proposal to limit UAS flights to not more than 30 minutes, or enough battery reserve to 

ensure that the UAS lands at the ground station with at least 20% battery reserve power, 

whichever happens first. Given the limitations on its proposed operations and the location 

of those proposed operations, a reduced minimum power reserve for flight in daylight 

VFR conditions is reasonable. 

See Exemption No. 11109 at 15.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the Skycatch UAS; the

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will 

ensure that Woolpert may safely operate the battery powered Skycatch UA during daylight hours 

in VFR conditions for a total duration of not more than 30 minutes, and landing with five

minutes of battery power remaining. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151

establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating 

limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at 

less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 

10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS,

in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 
28

8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110,

11136, 11138).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Woolpert submits that the equivalent level of safety with 

regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because 

Woolpert will use its trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive 

maintenance on the unmanned aircraft system using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. Furthermore, Woolpert will document 

and maintain all maintenance records for the Skycatch UAS. 

Since the Skycatch UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the manufacturer’s

maintenance manual, Woolpert will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). The Flight Manual For The Skycatch UAS

sets forth airworthiness requirements for the UA, including preflight and post flight inspections, 

as well as scheduled maintenance in four categories: daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly. 

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Woolpert will

perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed by the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. The Flight 

Manual For The Skycatch UAS details procedures for each component of the UA, including the 

components of the propulsion system, avionics system, and payload system.

A complete description of the Skycatch UAS airworthiness and maintenance 

requirements is set forth at page 6 of the “Flight Manual For The Skycatch Unmanned Aircraft 
29

System (UAS),” attached hereto as Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains proprietary information and is 

to be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety 

established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the 

Skycatch UAS will be performed by Woolpert trained technicians, who will document and 

maintain maintenance records for the Skycatch UAS. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning the Skycatch UAS 

and Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that 

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the 

UAS are considered. In Exemption No. 11109, the FAA stated the following concerning the 

Skycatch UAS and the Skycatch Flight Manual: 

Regarding the petitioner’s requested relief from 14 C.F.R 91.405 (a) Maintenance 

required, 91.407(a)(1) Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, 

or alteration, 91.409(a)(2) Inspections, and 91.417(a) and (b) Maintenance records, the 

FAA has determined that relief from § 91.409(a)(1) is also necessary because it is an 

alternate inspection requirement of § 91.409(a)(2). The FAA has carefully evaluated the 

petitioner’s request and determined that cause for granting the exemption is warranted. 

The FAA notes that the petitioner’s Skycatch UAS Flight Manual contain daily, preflight, 

monthly and yearly checks for the UAS. The FAA finds that adherence to the Skycatch 

Flight Manual, as required by the conditions and limitations below, is sufficient to ensure 

that safety is not adversely affected. In accordance with the petitioner’s UAS 

maintenance, inspection, and recordkeeping requirements, the FAA finds that exemption 

from 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) is 

warranted subject to the conditions and limitations below.

In consideration of Woolpert’s proposed operating limitations, the most recent Skycatch 

Flight Manual, and the technical aspects of the Skycatch UAS, Woolpert submits that safety will 

not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1)

and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific 

to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. 
30

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 

11136, 11138).

 7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Woolpert requests that the FAA

prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the Skycatch UAS, which contain such 

safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such 

special conditions will permit safe operation of the UA for the limited purpose of conducting 

aerial acquisitions over certain rural areas of the United States. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the 

public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such 

UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that 

must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

§ 21.16, for operation of the Skycatch UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 

21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design 

features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller 

because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, 

he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special 

conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety 

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.
31

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may

prescribe special conditions for Woolpert’s intended operation of the Skycatch UAS, which

contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) 

& (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) 

& (b).

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating:

The Rules From Which Woolpert Seeks Exemption:

Woolpert, Inc. seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 

61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Woolpert Seeks:

This exemption will permit Woolpert, Inc. to commercially operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions and research 

over certain rural areas of the United States.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support 

Woolpert’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS

may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Woolpert’s request for exemption may be granted 

pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create 

a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and 

further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 
32

As discussed in detail above, Woolpert will operate the Skycatch UAS safely in the NAS,

without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to 

national security.

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, Woolpert seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe 

operation of the Skycatch UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the 

limited purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions over certain rural areas of the United States. 

By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the 

public, by allowing Woolpert to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the Skycatch UAS

commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Woolpert respectfully requests that the 

Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b), and permit Woolpert to operate the Skycatch UAS commercially for the 

purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions and research over certain rural areas of the United 

States.
33

Dated: January 8, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

The Aviation Law Firm

/s/ Gregory S. Winton

____________________________

Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

Jared M. Allen, Esq. 

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294-8550

Fax: (866) 568-9886

Attorneys for Petitioner 

cc: James H. Williams, AFS-80

Robert Pappas

Dean Griffith, Esq.