15586 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Notices 

available, you can provide this 

information on the cover sheet and not 

in the body of your comments and you 

must identify this information as 

‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked 

as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed 

except in accordance with § 10.20 (21 

CFR 10.20) and other applicable 

disclosure law. For more information 

about FDA’s posting of comments to 

public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, 

September 18, 2015, or access the 

information at: https://

www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015- 

09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or the 

electronic and written/paper comments 

received, go to https://

www.regulations.gov and insert the 

docket number, found in brackets in the 

heading of this document, into the 

‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts 

and/or go to the Dockets Management 

Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, 

Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory 

Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, 

Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 

301–796–3600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Drug Price Competition and 

Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 

(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic 

Animal Drug and Patent Term 

Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) 

generally provide that a patent may be 

extended for a period of up to 5 years 

so long as the patented item (human 

drug or biological product, animal drug 

product, medical device, food additive, 

or color additive) was subject to 

regulatory review by FDA before the 

item was marketed. Under these acts, a 

product’s regulatory review period 

forms the basis for determining the 

amount of extension an applicant may 

receive. 

A regulatory review period consists of 

two periods of time: a testing phase and 

an approval phase. For human drug 

products, the testing phase begins when 

the exemption to permit the clinical 

investigations of the drug becomes 

effective and runs until the approval 

phase begins. The approval phase starts 

with the initial submission of an 

application to market the human drug 

product and continues until FDA grants 

permission to market the drug product. 

Although only a portion of a regulatory 

review period may count toward the 

actual amount of extension that the 

Director of USPTO may award (for 

example, half the testing phase must be 

subtracted as well as any time that may 

have occurred before the patent was 

issued), FDA’s determination of the 

length of a regulatory review period for 

a human drug product will include all 

of the testing phase and approval phase 

as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). 

FDA has approved for marketing the 

human drug product, SOTYKTU 

(deucravacitinib). SOTYKTU is 

indicated for the treatment of adults 

with moderate-to-severe plaque 

psoriasis who are candidates for 

systemic therapy or phototherapy. 

Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO 

received a patent term restoration 

application for SOTYKTU (U.S. Patent 

No. RE47,929) from Bristol-Myers 

Squibb Company, and the USPTO 

requested FDA’s assistance in 

determining the patent’s eligibility for 

patent term restoration. In a letter dated 

September 28, 2023, FDA advised the 

USPTO that this human drug product 

had undergone a regulatory review 

period and that the approval of 

SOTYKTU represented the first 

permitted commercial marketing or use 

of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO 

requested that FDA determine the 

product’s regulatory review period. 

II. Determination of Regulatory Review 

Period 

FDA has determined that the 

applicable regulatory review period for 

SOTYKTU is 2,136 days. Of this time, 

1,770 days occurred during the testing 

phase of the regulatory review period, 

while 366 days occurred during the 

approval phase. These periods of time 

were derived from the following dates: 

1. The date an exemption under 

section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 

355(i)) became effective: November 6, 

2016. FDA has verified the applicant’s 

claim that the date the investigational 

new drug application became effective 

was on November 6, 2016. 

2. The date the application was 

initially submitted with respect to the 

human drug product under section 505 

of the FD&C Act: September 10, 2021. 

FDA has verified the applicant’s claim 

that the new drug application (NDA) for 

SOTYKTU (NDA 214958) was initially 

submitted on September 10, 2021. 

3. The date the application was 

approved: September 9, 2022. FDA has 

verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 

214958 was approved on September 9, 

2022. 

This determination of the regulatory 

review period establishes the maximum 

potential length of a patent extension. 

However, the USPTO applies several 

statutory limitations in its calculations 

of the actual period for patent extension. 

In its application for patent extension, 

this applicant seeks 1,037 days of patent 

term extension. 

III. Petitions 

Anyone with knowledge that any of 

the dates as published are incorrect may 

submit either electronic or written 

comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask 

for a redetermination (see DATES). 

Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21 

CFR 60.30), any interested person may 

petition FDA for a determination 

regarding whether the applicant for 

extension acted with due diligence 

during the regulatory review period. To 

meet its burden, the petition must 

comply with all the requirements of 

§ 60.30, including but not limited to: 

must be timely (see DATES), must be 

filed in accordance with § 10.20, must 

contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA 

investigation, and must certify that a 

true and complete copy of the petition 

has been served upon the patent 

applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th 

Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) 

Petitions should be in the format 

specified in 21 CFR 10.30. 

Submit petitions electronically to 

https://www.regulations.gov at Docket 

No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written 

petitions (two copies are required) to the 

Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), 

Food and Drug Administration, 5630 

Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 

20852. 

Dated: February 28, 2024. 

Lauren K. Roth, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04483 Filed 3–1–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

[Docket No. FDA–2019–E–5740] 

Determination of Regulatory Review 

Period for Purposes of Patent 

Extension; SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or the Agency) has 

determined the regulatory review period 

for the SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM and is publishing this notice 

of that determination as required by 

law. FDA has made the determination 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Notices 15587 

because of the submission of an 

application to the Director of the U.S. 

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), 

Department of Commerce, for the 

extension of a patent which claims that 

medical device. 

DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any 

of the dates as published (see 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are 

incorrect may submit either electronic 

or written comments and ask for a 

redetermination by May 3, 2024. 

Furthermore, any interested person may 

petition FDA for a determination 

regarding whether the applicant for 

extension acted with due diligence 

during the regulatory review period by 

September 3, 2024. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

for more information. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

as follows. Please note that late, 

untimely filed comments will not be 

considered. The https://

www.regulations.gov electronic filing 

system will accept comments until 

11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of 

May 3, 2024. Comments received by 

mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/ 

paper submissions) will be considered 

timely if they are received on or before 

that date. 

Electronic Submissions 

Submit electronic comments in the 

following way: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Comments submitted electronically, 

including attachments, to https://

www.regulations.gov will be posted to 

the docket unchanged. Because your 

comment will be made public, you are 

solely responsible for ensuring that your 

comment does not include any 

confidential information that you or a 

third party may not wish to be posted, 

such as medical information, your or 

anyone else’s Social Security number, or 

confidential business information, such 

as a manufacturing process. Please note 

that if you include your name, contact 

information, or other information that 

identifies you in the body of your 

comments, that information will be 

posted on https://www.regulations.gov. 

• If you want to submit a comment 

with confidential information that you 

do not wish to be made available to the 

public, submit the comment as a 

written/paper submission and in the 

manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper 

Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). 

Written/Paper Submissions 

Submit written/paper submissions as 

follows: 

• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for 

written/paper submissions): Dockets 

Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and 

Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers 

Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 

• For written/paper comments 

submitted to the Dockets Management 

Staff, FDA will post your comment, as 

well as any attachments, except for 

information submitted, marked and 

identified, as confidential, if submitted 

as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’ 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket No. FDA– 

2019–E–5740 for ‘‘Determination of 

Regulatory Review Period for Purposes 

of Patent Extension; SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM.’’ Received comments, those 

filed in a timely manner (see 

ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket 

and, except for those submitted as 

‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly 

viewable at https://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Dockets Management Staff 

between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, 240–402–7500. 

• Confidential Submissions—To 

submit a comment with confidential 

information that you do not wish to be 

made publicly available, submit your 

comments only as a written/paper 

submission. You should submit two 

copies total. One copy will include the 

information you claim to be confidential 

with a heading or cover note that states 

‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The 

Agency will review this copy, including 

the claimed confidential information, in 

its consideration of comments. The 

second copy, which will have the 

claimed confidential information 

redacted/blacked out, will be available 

for public viewing and posted on 

https://www.regulations.gov. Submit 

both copies to the Dockets Management 

Staff. If you do not wish your name and 

contact information to be made publicly 

available, you can provide this 

information on the cover sheet and not 

in the body of your comments and you 

must identify this information as 

‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked 

as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed 

except in accordance with § 10.20 (21 

CFR 10.20) and other applicable 

disclosure law. For more information 

about FDA’s posting of comments to 

public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, 

September 18, 2015, or access the 

information at: https://

www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015- 

09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or the 

electronic and written/paper comments 

received, go to https://

www.regulations.gov and insert the 

docket number, found in brackets in the 

heading of this document, into the 

‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts 

and/or go to the Dockets Management 

Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, 

Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory 

Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 

10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, 

Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 

301–796–3600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Drug Price Competition and 

Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 

(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic 

Animal Drug and Patent Term 

Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) 

generally provide that a patent may be 

extended for a period of up to 5 years 

so long as the patented item (human 

drug or biological product, animal drug 

product, medical device, food additive, 

or color additive) was subject to 

regulatory review by FDA before the 

item was marketed. Under these acts, a 

product’s regulatory review period 

forms the basis for determining the 

amount of extension an applicant may 

receive. 

A regulatory review period consists of 

two periods of time: a testing phase and 

an approval phase. For medical devices, 

the testing phase begins with a clinical 

investigation of the device and runs 

until the approval phase begins. The 

approval phase starts with the initial 

submission of an application to market 

the device and continues until 

permission to market the device is 

granted. Although only a portion of a 

regulatory review period may count 

toward the actual amount of extension 

that the Director of USPTO may award 

(half the testing phase must be 

subtracted as well as any time that may 

have occurred before the patent was 

issued), FDA’s determination of the 

length of a regulatory review period for 

a medical device will include all of the 

testing phase and approval phase as 

specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B). 

FDA has approved for marketing the 

medical device SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM. The SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM is indicated for relief of aortic 

stenosis in patients with symptomatic 

heart disease due to severe native 

calcific aortic stenosis who are judged 

by a Heart Team, including a cardiac 

surgeon, to be appropriate for the 

transcatheter heart valve replacement 

therapy. The device is indicated for 

patients with symptomatic heart disease 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
15588 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 43 / Monday, March 4, 2024 / Notices 

due to failing (stenosed, insufficient, or 

combined) of a surgical or transcatheter 

bioprosthetic aortic valve, a surgical 

bioprosthetic mitral valve, or a native 

mitral valve with an annuloplasty ring 

who are judged by a Heart Team, 

including a cardiac surgeon, to be at 

high or greater risk for open surgical 

therapy (i.e., predicted risk of surgical 

mortality ≥8 percent at 30 days, based 

on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons 

(STS) risk score and other clinical comorbidities unmeasured by the STS risk 

calculator). Subsequent to this approval, 

the USPTO received a patent term 

restoration application for the SAPIEN 3 

ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART 

VALVE SYSTEM (U.S. Patent No. 

7,780,723) from Edwards Lifesciences 

Corporation, and the USPTO requested 

FDA’s assistance in determining this 

patent’s eligibility for patent term 

restoration. In a letter dated January 21, 

2020, FDA advised the USPTO that this 

medical device had undergone a 

regulatory review period and that the 

approval of the SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM represented the first permitted 

commercial marketing or use of the 

product. Thereafter, the USPTO 

requested that FDA determine the 

product’s regulatory review period. 

II. Determination of Regulatory Review 

Period 

FDA has determined that the 

applicable regulatory review period for 

the SAPIEN 3 ULTRA 

TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE 

SYSTEM is 101 days. Of this time, 0 

days occurred during the testing phase 

of the regulatory review period, while 

101 days occurred during the approval 

phase. These periods of time were 

derived from the following dates: 

1. The date an exemption for this 

device, under section 520(g) of the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)), became 

effective: not available. The applicant 

claims that the testing phase began on 

April 6, 2018. However, FDA is unable 

to validate the beginning of a testing 

phase. No investigational device 

exemption as required under section 

520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests 

to begin was referenced, no evidence of 

institutional review board approval was 

found, and no confirmation of the date 

on which the device was first used with 

human subjects as part of a clinical 

investigation to be filed with FDA to 

secure premarket approval of the device 

could be determined in available FDA 

records. 

2. The date an application was 

initially submitted with respect to the 

device under section 515 of the FD&C 

Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): September 18, 

2018. The applicant claims September 

14, 2018, as the date the premarket 

approval application (PMA) for the 

SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER 

HEART VALVE SYSTEM (PMA 

P140031S074) was initially submitted. 

However, FDA records indicate that 

PMA P140031S074 was submitted on 

September 18, 2018. 

3. The date the application was 

approved: December 27, 2018. FDA has 

verified the applicant’s claim that PMA 

P140031S074 was approved on 

December 27, 2018. 

This determination of the regulatory 

review period establishes the maximum 

potential length of a patent extension. 

However, the USPTO applies several 

statutory limitations in its calculations 

of the actual period for patent extension. 

In its application for patent extension, 

this applicant seeks 184 days of patent 

term extension. 

III. Petitions 

Anyone with knowledge that any of 

the dates as published are incorrect may 

submit either electronic or written 

comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask 

for a redetermination (see DATES). 

Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21 

CFR 60.30), any interested person may 

petition FDA for a determination 

regarding whether the applicant for 

extension acted with due diligence 

during the regulatory review period. To 

meet its burden, the petition must 

comply with all the requirements of 

§ 60.30, including but not limited to: 

must be timely (see DATES), must be 

filed in accordance with § 10.20, must 

contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA 

investigation, and must certify that a 

true and complete copy of the petition 

has been served upon the patent 

applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th 

Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) 

Petitions should be in the format 

specified in 21 CFR 10.30. 

Submit petitions electronically to 

https://www.regulations.gov at Docket 

No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written 

petitions (two copies are required) to the 

Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), 

Food and Drug Administration, 5630 

Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 

20852. 

Dated: February 28, 2024. 

Lauren K. Roth, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04478 Filed 3–1–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

[Docket Nos. FDA–2023–E–2603; FDA– 

2023–E–2604; FDA–2023–E–2605; and FDA– 

2023–E–2606] 

Determination of Regulatory Review 

Period for Purposes of Patent 

Extension; RELYVRIO 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or the Agency) has 

determined the regulatory review period 

for RELYVRIO and is publishing this 

notice of that determination as required 

by law. FDA has made the 

determination because of the 

submission of applications to the 

Director of the U.S. Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO), Department 

of Commerce, for the extension of a 

patent which claims that human drug 

product. 

DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any 

of the dates as published (see 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are 

incorrect must submit either electronic 

or written comments and ask for a 

redetermination by May 3, 2024. 

Furthermore, any interested person may 

petition FDA for a determination 

regarding whether the applicant for 

extension acted with due diligence 

during the regulatory review period by 

September 3, 2024. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

for more information. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

as follows. Please note that late, 

untimely filed comments will not be 

considered. The https://

www.regulations.gov electronic filing 

system will accept comments until 

11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of 

May 3, 2024. Comments received by 

mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/ 

paper submissions) will be considered 

timely if they are received on or before 

that date. 

Electronic Submissions 

Submit electronic comments in the 

following way: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Comments submitted electronically, 

including attachments, to https://

www.regulations.gov will be posted to 

the docket unchanged. Because your 

comment will be made public, you are 

solely responsible for ensuring that your 

comment does not include any 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES