CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 1165 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 08/25/08

Rule Title(s): Glass Melting Furnaces

Date Submitted to ARB: 11/03/08

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 01/28/08

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Tracy Walters Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6122 E-mail Address: twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 1165 is proposed for amendment to address (non-s ubstantive) comments from both CARB and USEPA, and

to correct a rule citation.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 0

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 0

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 1 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc., 17300 Silic a Dr, Victorville, CA 92392 (San Bernardino County)

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emissi on Reductions are: Fuel Requirements ((C)(2)(b))

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C) Work Practice Standar ds in Section(s): (C)

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (D) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): (D)5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: No emission reductions will result from this RACT rule as the District's only facility has existing RACT permit

conditions more stringent than the rule.