alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4612 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2- 

pyridinesulfonamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. SCHOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3- 

(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.33.63 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamide) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4612 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Amendment by France of the public service obligations imposed in respect of scheduled air services between Rennes and Mulhouse

(2006/C 52/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Minimum frequency

The minimum level of service provided must be two round trips per day, morning and evening, excluding public holidays, from Monday to Friday, for 220 days a year.

The services must be operated without a stopover between Rennes (Saint-Jacques) and Basel-Mulhouse.

Type of aircraft used and capacity provided

The service must be operated using a pressurised aircraft with a capacity of at least eighteen seats.

Timetables

Timetables during the working week must be such as to enable business passengers to make the round trip within the day and to spend at least seven hours at their destination, whether Basel-Mulhouse or Rennes (Saint-Jacques).

Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed using at least one computerised booking system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any one year. Moreover, the carrier must give six months' notice before discontinuing the services.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the abovementioned public service obligations may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

----
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN. TP,XAS 78711 

October 3, 1977 

Honorable Robert Grade1 

Lampasas County Attorney 

P. 0. Box 95 

Lampasas, Texas 76550 

Opinion No. H-1064 

Re: Whether a county clerk 

can replace an erroneous 

original death certificate 

with a corrected certificate. 

Dear Mr. Gradel: 

You have asked for an opinion on the following question: 

Whether the County Clerk can remove a 

death certificate which has an erroneous 

cause of death, and replace it with a new 

original, with the correct cause of death? 

Rule 40a of article 4477, V.T.C.S.., requires the filing of 

a certificate for each death with the local registrar of the 

district in which the death occurred. Rule 51a, article 4477, 

provides for the amendment of death certificates: 

After its acceptance for registration 

by the local registrar, no record of 

any birth, death, or stillbirth shall 

be altered or changed: provided, however, 

that if any such record is incomplete, or 

satisfactory evidence can be submitted 

proving the record to be in error in any 

respect, an amending certificate may be 

filed for the purpose of completing or 

correcting such record, which amendment 

shall be in a form prescribed by the State 

Department of Health and shall, if accepted 

for filing, be attached to and become a 

part of the legal record of such birth, 

death, or stillbirth. 

This provision expressly forbids alteration of a death certificate after its acceptance by the local registrar. Anyone 

who wilfully alters a death certificate other than as provided 

by rule 51a of article 4477 is guilty of a misdemeanor, and 

upon conviction is subject to punishment. V.T.C.S. art. 4477~. 

.p. 4564 
Honorable Robert Grade1 - Page 2 (H-1064) 

Attorney General Opinion O-4654 (1942), discussing 

portion of rule 51a, determined that an erroneous birth 

this 

certificate should not be removed or destroyed, but corrected by 

attaching an amendment. We believe the removal of the erroneous certificate would be an alteration of a death record 

forbidden by rule 51a. Cf. Wichita Farm Lighting Co. v. Moore, 

46 S.W.2d 383 (Tex. Civ.xp. -- Amarillo 1932, no writ) (detachment of written agreement attached to note constituted 

material alteration of note). We understand that the death 

certificate in this case has already been corrected in accordance with rule 51a by the attachment of an amending certificate, which is now part of the legal record of the death. 

SUMMARY 

The County Clerk may not remove a death 

certificate which has an erroneous cause 

of death and replace it with a new original showing the correct cause of death. 

The certificate may be corrected in accordance with rule 51a of article 4477, 

V.T.C.S ., ,by the attachment of an amending 

certificate. 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

YL-LA+ 

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant 

c. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

jst 

P. 4565
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 07135 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  07135\07135_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 07135\07135_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 07135\07135_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_PART C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_PART D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_PART F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_PART G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\07135_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07135\7135_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_D-1 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Harrison Part F LTS-1 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Map 1_Harrison station aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Map 2_Harrison disposal site aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Map 3_Harrison station topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Map 4_Harrison disposal site topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Map 5_Harrison outfalls.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Part F Section 5 F5-6 Landfill-1 GW Drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_WB-1 water flow.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\07135_Wetland Cells and sampling points.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07135\Supporting Documents\Emails\1_25_11 Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 07135\Supporting Documents\Emails\1_25_11\Steam electric questionnaire questions for 7135.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 07135\Supporting Documents\Emails\2_16_11 Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 07135\Supporting Documents\Emails\2_16_11\Re Harrison Power Station Follow-Up Response.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 07135\Supporting Documents\Emails\Re Steam electric questionnaire questions for 7135.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response 07135\07135_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-130147 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of International Coal Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Shared-Based Payment*, as of January 1, 2006 and the recognition and related disclosure provisions of Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans*, as of December 31, 2006), and our reports dated March 1, 2007 on the consolidatedfinancial statement schedule and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Coal Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Cincinnati, Ohio

March 1, 2007
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4639 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bayderm Bottom DLV-N. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALTMIRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bayderm Bottom DLVN. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYDERM BOTTOM DLV-N. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bayderm Bottom DLV-N) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4639 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Stratos Renewables
Corporation (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
May 1, 2009
 
 By: /s/ Thomas
Snyder
 Thomas
Snyder
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Stratos Renewables Corporation and will be
retained by Stratos Renewables Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Annual Report of My Quote Zone, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Eduard Tabara, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Eduard Tabara
-----------------
    Eduard Tabara
    President


Date  January 4, 2007
      ---------------


<PAGE>
### CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONER AND HEAT PUMP SHIPMENT FORECAST SPREADSHEET I nstructions: Select price elasticity. Base Case on "Welcome NES" sheet must then be reset R esults are displayed in charts and provided in the 'Shipment Forecast' sheet. Detailed model inputs are in yellow cells in 'Inputs' sheet. Price/Income Elasticity : Price Elasticity : Average Impact 2006 to 2030: New Shipments 0.00% Mean Age 0.00% New Sales ($) 0.00% Lifetime 0.00% Repairs 0.00%

Early Repl m 0.00% 

### Impact at 2006 New Shipments 0.00% New Sales ($ 0.00% Early Replacemen t 0.00% Post-Standard New Shipments (@2030 ) : 4.87 millio n Gross New Retail Sales (@2030) : $10,889 millio n 

# Shipments of A/C Product
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030Millions Historical (1951-1997) Accounting and Elasticity Base Case Projected History 

### None



## Age of Retired AC Product 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030Age when Retired (years) Model Estimate 

## Mean Age of AC Product 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1995 2005 2015 2025Mean Age of AC Product Model Estimate 

### Model vs. Historical Data y = 1.0357x R 2 = 0.8951 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Model vs. Data Linear (Model vs. Data) 

### Medium
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 24865.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1950.

*139James G. Denton, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to murder without malice upon one Charles B. Sims and by the jury assessed a penalty of one year in the penitentiary.

It is claimed herein that the trial court committed fundamental error in its charge in paragraph 13 thereof, which reads as follows: “But if from the evidence you believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Harrison Smith, on or about the 11th day of December, 1949, in the county of Lubbock and state of Texas, with a deadly weapon, to wit, a rifle, and without malice, as that term has been hereinbefore defined to you, and not in his own proper self-defense, did assault Charles B. Sims, you will find the defendant guilty of assault with intent to murder without malice and so say by your verdict and assess his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of years not less than one nor more than three, as you may determine and state in your verdict.”

It is evident therefrom that the trial court omitted to require the jury to find that appellant “did assault Charles B. Sims” with intent to kill said Sims.

“A charge is fundamentally erroneous if it authorizes a conviction for an assault with intent to murder without requiring the jury to find an intent to kill.” Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., p. 956, Sec. 1670, and many authorities there cited.

A further matter that gives us some concern is found in a bill filed as No. 1 in which it is shown that after the testimony herein was heard and the jury charged, that they retired to consider of their verdict in the afternoon of the day of trial; that after they had deliberated about four hours, they returned into court and notified the judge that they were unable to agree upon a verdict, evidently desiring to be discharged. Thereupon the trial judge made the following remarks to the jury: “I am not ready to discharge you at this time. The facts are too clear in this case for there to be any hung jury in this case. It costs too much to try these cases over.”

Whereupon the jury again retired and on the following morning returned with their verdict of one year.

The bill of exceptions signed by the judge shows that no exception was taken to these remarks at the time they were made, but that they were called to the court’s attention in the motion for a new trial; and the court signed, approved and ordered filed the bill to that effect containing such remarks.

We think such a statement by the trial court violates the statute, Art. 707, C. C.P., and conveyed to the jury the court’s opinion of the case. See Kelly v. State, 33 Tex.Cr.R. 31, 24 S.W. 295, 296, which case was reversed because the trial court told the jury: “ ‘it seems Strange you would fail to agree, when there is so little conflict in the evidence. If it was a long, complicated case, with conflicting testimony, the court could readily see a cause for failure to agree,’ etc.”

For the errors complained of, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of teleconference meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with § 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency gives notice that the following meeting will be held: 

*Name:*                         Technical Mapping Advisory Council.                     

*Date of Meeting:*                         October 2, 2000.                     

*Place:*                         The FEMA Conference Operator in Washington, DC will administer the teleconference. Individuals interested in participating should call 1-800-320-4330 at the time of the teleconference. Callers will be prompted for the conference code, #15, and they will then be connected through to the teleconference.                     

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., EST.                     

### Proposed Agenda 

1. Call to order. 

2. Announcements. 

3. Action on minutes from August 2000 teleconference meeting. 

4. Review Annual and Year 2000 Report draft text. 

                        5. Discuss agenda for October 2000 meeting.                               ( print page 57813)    

6. New business. 

7. Adjournment. 

*Status:*                         This meeting is open to the public.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Sally P. Magee, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., room 442, Washington, DC 20472, telephone (202) 646-8242 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon request 30 days after they have been approved by the next Technical Mapping Advisory Council meeting in October 2000. 

Michael K. Buckley, 

Director, Technical Services Division, Mitigation Directorate.

[FR Doc. 00-24704 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-04-P
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00235-CR

FRANCISCO NOEL MARTINEZ,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 5

of Tarrant County (1544967)

March 28, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect that 

punishment was assessed by the trial court. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Dabney Bassel__________________

 Justice Dabney Bassel