alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4479 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Clodinafop. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Clodinafop. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLODINAFOP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.55 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Clodinafop) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking 2.9% and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

8 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

9 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4479 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R.47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60406

Summary Calendar

 

VERONICA MCCALLUP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CV-252-WS

 

October 28, 2002

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Veronica McCallup, Mississippi prisoner no. K1256, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of her civil rights action pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim.

On appeal, McCallup has abandoned the allegations in her

complaint regarding her eviction, the loss of bonding money, and

the loss of money to a car dealership by failing to brief these
2

issues. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993). We need not address the new issues McCallup attempts to

raise before this court. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,

183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). With respect to McCallup’s

assertion that she was deprived of certain property rights relating

to timber, she stated that the land on which the timber was located

is owned by a corporation. This corporation has not been named as

a party to this action. Further, the factual allegations of the

complaint do not suffice to suggest any likelihood of the presence

of state action and action under color of state law as required for

all claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See, e.g., American Mfrs. Mut.

Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 119 S.Ct. 977, 985-89 (1999). Nor do the

allegations of the complaint tend to show with respect to any

complained of deprivation of property rights that Mississippi’s

postdeprivation remedies are inadequate. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468

U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Nickens v. Melton, 38 F.3d 183, 185-86 (5th

Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of 4C Controls Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Angeloglou, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:
 
 (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2009
 By:
              /s/Anastasios
      AngeloglouName:   
      Anastasios AngeloglouTitle:     
      Principal Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 10, 2006
    
    /s/ DAVID W. HOCKENBROCHTDavid W. Hockenbrocht, Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 10, 2006
    
    /s/ RICHARD L. LANGLEYRichard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer
 31
----

Interbranch organisation in the fresh fruit and vegetables sector

(Communication made under Article 19(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96)

(2006/C 67/09)

The Italian authorities have notified the Commission of their decision to recognise under Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (2), the national interbranch association for fruit and vegetables (‘Organismo interprofessionale del settore ortofrutticolo’).

—   Area of activity: Italy.

—   Activities: ‘L'organismo interprofessionale del settore ortofrutticolo’ will carry out all the activities laid down for interbranch organisations in the relevant parts of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96.

For the sake of transparency, the communications regarding interbranch organisations recognised earlier can be found in the following issues of the Official Journal of the European Communities:

and in the following issue of the Official Journal of the European Union:

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64.

----
** **

**CNH EQUIPMENT TRUST2005-A**

** **

**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Michel Lecomte, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in theyear covered by this annual report, of CNH Equipment Trust 2005-A;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the informationin these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the distributionor servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the Servicerunder the sale and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in thesereports is included in these reports;

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing theactivities performed by the Servicer under the sale and servicing, or similar,agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review requiredunder that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under that agreement;

 

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the Servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with our minimum servicing standards,as set forth in the sale and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is includedin these reports.

 

March 17, 2006

 
| By:                                     | /s/ Michel Lecomte |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                    |
| Michel Lecomte                          |
| Chairman (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William M. Clancy, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                                   /s/ William M. Clancy
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   William M. Clancy
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
                                                   November 11, 2003
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4835 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 

polymer with N,NNBis( 2-aminoethyl)–1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, 

methosulfate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,4- 

Benzenedicarboxylic acid, polymer with N,NNBis( 2- 

aminoethyl)–1,2-ethanediamine, cyclized, methosulfate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,4–BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, POLYMER 

4 WITH N,NNBIS( 2–AMINOETHYL)–1,2– 

5 ETHANEDIAMINE, CYCLIZED, 

6 METHOSULFATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.93 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 1,4–Benzenedicarboxylic acid, polymer with N,NNBis( 2– 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4835 IH

1 aminoethyl)–1,2–ethanediamine, cyclized, methosulfate) is 

2 amended by striking the date in the effective period col3 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

6 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

7 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Original Message

From: Rae Trifle [mailto:Trine.Raeepamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:43 PMTo: Conrad Chin

Cc: Canton Nash; Beth Friedman; Margaret Sieffert; Brad Nelson; Jaime Wagner; Shilpa Patel

Subject: Talked with Christina Weig at Ohio EPA

I talked with Christina Wieg at Ohio EPA (SEDO):

1. I asked her to send me the Emission Fee Reports for furnace 18 from

2001 and the last year they were operating, I believe it’s 2009. She said she would fax them to me and when she does, I

will send them your way Conrad.2. I asked her about the status of furnace 18. She said that every time she meets with reps from Eramet she asks about

the furnace and whether or not Eramet will start it up again. She told them that if they are not going to start up then

they need to formally inform her in writing so Ohio EPA can remove the source from the Title V. She said Eramet refuses

to do this and says they have not made up their minds in regards to furnace 18, therefore, she counts it as viable

emission source.

3. I talked with her about any historical capture efficiency data that she might be aware of? She said that as long as

she’s been the assigned engineer (7 yrs) there have been no CE testing etc. that she knew about.

She was going to ask Rex Haggy (the previous inspector for many years -now works in water at SEDO) if he was awareof any CE testing especially since Rex was the engineer at the time Ohio EPA required Eramet to put additional controlson furnace 12 a decade earlier. She will get back to me with his answer.

She also made the remark that every time she goes out to Eramet, that the hoods and curtains over the tap holes are

always broken and needing maintenance. I just thought this was an interesting observation.

4. The final discussion was about Eramet being able to build an localized evacuation system for the #1 furnace casting

operations (sand bars). She said that it would not be impossible and that Eramet needed to learn how to think outside

the box. She says the crane is in the way somewhat, but the area can be reconfigured to fit a new localized ventilation

system, especially since Felman has done it and she even told Eramet to check out Felman’s design to see how it was

done.

Rae
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17     | 18     | 0      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Dorie Scialdone, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Victor Scialdone, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

(Claim No. 75050.)

In a *459claim to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), dated February 24, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied her motion to compel the defendants to produce documents pursuant to two notices of discovery and inspection.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the perfection of this appeal, a final judgment in this action was entered in favor of the defendants. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32(b)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended  March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brian X. Tierney


Brian X. Tierney


Chief Financial Officer








May 3, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris by judgment of that court of 18 November 2005 in Vestel France SA v Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects

(Case C-448/05)

(2006/C 48/32)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Cour d'appel de Paris (Paris Court of Appeal) of 18 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 16 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Vestel France SA and Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects on the following question:

‘Is Annex 11 to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 (1) invalid as being contrary to Article 24 of Council Regulation No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (2) in that it has the result that a television receiver manufactured in Turkey in the circumstances described in the proceedings is held to be of Chinese origin?’

----

(1)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, p. 1).

(2)  OJ L 302, p. 1.

----
**Exhibit
      32.02**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
      Earnest, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/James
                EarnestChief
                Financial OfficerApril
                22, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. FRED HAMMOND, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:92-cr-00172-JAB-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Hammond, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fred Hammond, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v.

Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered its order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on April 3, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on June 16, 2009.

Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because Hammond failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED