alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)       
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History:                                        
|                                                     
|Lower 48 States Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Lower 48 States Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,293  | 2,116  | 3,110 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,336  | 7,994  | 10,371 | 11,415 | 13,447 | 15,213 | 17,032 | 18,589 | 22,054 | 25,556
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26,139 | 27,985 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### MORGAN et al. v. STATE.

No. 25726.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1952.

Crunk & Morgan, Greenville, for appellants.

Ralph R. Rash, Dist. Atty., Sulphur Springs, O. S. Moore, County Atty., Green-ville, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a final judgment against sureties in a bond forfeiture case.

The statement of the facts adduced upon the hearing does not reflect that the state introduced in evidence the judgment nisi. It is insisted that the absence of such proof renders the evidence insufficient to support the judgment.

The judgment nisi is a necessary and essential element of the state’s cause of action in a bond forfeiture case, for without a judgment nisi there can be no final judgment. Watkins v. State, 16 Tex. App. 646; Gass v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 238, 8 S.W.2d 123; Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, p. 969, Sec. 96. In Nelson v. State, 44 Tex.Cr.R. 595, 73 S.W. 398, and authorities there cited, the failure to introduce the judgment nisi in evidence was fatal to a valid judgment.

The state appears to recognize the seriousness of the situation confronting it by the failure to introduce in evidence the judgment nisi and insists that inasmuch as the trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury, the trial court could and would take judicial knowledge of its own judgments, thereby rendering unnecessary the introduction in evidence of the judgment nisi.

It is unnecessary to here determine the question presented, for we note a variance between the bond and the judgment nisi of such nature and seriousness as that appellants would have been entitled to urge such variance if the judgment nisi had been introduced in evidence. They would be deprived of such right in the absence of an effprt by the state to introduce the judgment nisi in evidence.

The variance referred to lies in the following facts:

The bond described the offense with which the principal stood charged as a “felony.” No further description of the nature of that offense was made or attempted.

The judgment nisi describes the offense with which the principal stood charged as “failure to stop and render aid.” It is not recited that such offense was a felony.

“Failure to stop and render aid” is not an offense eo nomine and cannot be said, as a matter of law, to be a felony.

Because of the failure to introduce in evidence the judgment nisi, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
<PAGE>

                             Note to Exhibit 10.2

       The Trust Agreement is incorporated by reference from the Company's Form
10K filed with the Commission for the period ending December 31, 2000.  The five
additional Trust Agreements are substantially identical in all material respects
to the filed Trust Agreement except as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      Aircraft (Tail No.)                 Closing Date                   Owner Participant
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                       <C>

N362ML*                                 October 19, 2000           Silvermine River Finance One, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N363ML                                  November 29,2000           Aircraft Services Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N364ML                                  January 30, 2001           Aircraft Services Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N365ML                                  March 19, 2001             Aircraft Services Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N366ML                                  April 19, 2001             Castle Harbour-I Limited
                                                                   Liability Company
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N367ML                                  June 11, 2001              Aircraft Services Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

----------
* Filed document
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Timothy J.                  Tegeler                                                                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Timothy                J. Tegeler                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Altman, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered November 19, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The victim was robbed by three men while on her way to *480school on the morning of April 19, 1986. At trial both the victim and two eyewitnesses identified the defendant as one of the robbers. Moreover, the eyewitnesses were familiar with the defendant because he lived in their neighborhood. Thus, contrary to the defendant’s contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the first degree. Additionally, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Any possible prejudice to the defendant which may have been caused by the victim’s comment that the defendant’s family had threatened her was eliminated by the court’s prompt and forceful curative instruction *(see, People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 111; *People v Solano,*159 AD2d 738).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit *(see, People v Hall,*122 AD2d 163; *People v Johnson,*106 AD2d 469). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.
---

Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Section 302 Certification





I, Steven Dong, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smaller reporting company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;








Date: : June 28, 2010/s/ Steven DongSteven DongChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors and Member
TransMontaigne GP L.L.C.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-125209) on Form S-8 of TransMontaigne Partners L.P. of our report dated
March 1, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of TransMontaigne Partners L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended
June 30, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule (Exhibit 99.1) which appears in the December 31, 2005 Form 10-K of TransMontaigne Partners L.P.

| | KPMG LLP
| | --------

Denver,
Colorado
March 1, 2006

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Encore Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify to the best of their knowledge with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report) that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with all requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ James S. DAgostino, Jr.                                                    
|(Date)         |  |  |  | James S. DAgostino, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer                                
|               |  | 
|March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Anderson Creel                                                           
|(Date)         |  |  |  | L. Anderson Creel, Chief FinancialOfficer, Executive Vice President andTreasurer
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                                       
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Montana Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4889 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4889

         To suspend temporarily the duty on A5546 sulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on A5546 sulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. A5546 SULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Methyl 3-           Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          aminosulfonyl-2-                                                  12/31/2015
                          thiophenecarboxyl
                          ate (CAS No.
                          59337-93-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2935.00.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MAHA TABBARA AYOUBI,

Appellant

V.

SAMMY S. AYOUBI,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00145-CV

Appeal from the

16th District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# 15-01319-16)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Maha Tabbara Ayoubi, has failed to 

file her brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. 

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that her brief was past due and no motion for 

extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed 

grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed any 
- 2 -

response to the inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

December 9, 2016

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4756 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Blue 268. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Reactive Blue 

268. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 268. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4756 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4,11- 

Triphenodioxazinedisulfonic acid, 6,13-dichloro-3,10- 

bis[[2-[[4-fluoro-6-[(2- 

sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2- 

yl]amino]propyl]amino]-, 

lithium sodium salt (Reactive Blue 268) (CAS No. 

163062–28–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.16.30) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4448 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4448

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain acrylic staple 
                                fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain acrylic staple 
                                fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain acrylic staple 
fibers) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Chlorpyrifos - Me thyl’s Use on Stored Grains (Corn and Wheat): Checking our available data

sources, both proprietary ( Kline , 2004 ) and (NASS , 19 99 and 200 2 ) data , almost 110,000 pounds of Chlorpyrifos - Methyl was used on stored grains, on -farm (35,000 Lbs.) and off-farm (75,000 Lbs.) . This amounted to 6 percent of the stored - grain insecticide market. The 2004 proprietary data showed that the leading active ingredient is Aluminum Phosphide with 43 percent of the ma rk et, followed by Diatomaceous Earth (28%), and Malathion (15%). For W heat, t he only NASS Post- Harvest data are about 11,000 Lbs. of Ch lorpyrifos - Methyl used in 19 99 , and almost 19,000 Lbs. used in 200 2 . There were no NASS post- harvest data on corn during these two ye ars (19 99 and 200 2 ) . 

### Propri etary Data Used: THE U.S. MARKET FOR STORED GRAIN INSECTICIDES 2004 Public Data Links Used : 

### Agricultural Chemical Usage

– Postharvest Applications

– Corn and Wheat (March 1999): http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/AgriChemUsPostHarv//1990s/1999/AgriChem UsPostHarv- 03 - 18 - 1999_Corn%20and%20Wheat.pdf Agricultural Chemical Usage

– Postharvest Applications

– Wheat (March 2002): http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/AgriChemUsPostHarv//2000s/2002/AgriChem UsPostHarv- 03 - 13 - 2002_Wheat.pdf