alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael J. Valentino, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Adams Respiratory Therapeutics,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)): a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. [Intentionally omitted];  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: September 28, 2006         /s/ Michael J. Valentino   Michael J. Valentino   Chief Executive OfficerAdams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2011 - 0991 Directorate Identifier: 2010 - NM - 134 - AD

747 - 53A2605 --- 10/8/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWE D AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### MARTIN v. MARTIN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 13, 1953.

C. R. Baker, Princeton, for appellant.

Edward H. Johnstone, Princeton, for ap-pellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The appellant, Mrs. Mildred Martin, had a rule for contempt issued against her divorced husband to recover custody of their two children, whom he had refused to return to her after a visit, and to have him obey the order of the court to pay her $50 a month for their care. In response, the father asked that the judgment be modified and he be given the children’s custody. The court dismissed the rule and awarded the custody of the children to their father with the mother’s right of visitation. She appeals.

The record contains only depositions of certain witnesses. There is no order showing other evidence was heard orally, but the briefs are in agreement that there was considerable testimony so heard and that is not made a part of the record. However, the court’s opinion refers only to the witnesses who testified by deposition. The appellant contends that the presumption that the omitted testimony supports the judgment is not applicable for this reason and argues that the depositions do not sustain the finding of fact. We need not decide the point for, conceding it, we readily conclude that the evidence in the record does sustain the chancellor. It is better not to recite the story of the appellant’s misconduct.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**ANTHONY BURKE, BY HIS PNG JOHN**
**BURKE,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 61 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

GRANTED

**,** LIMITED TO **the issues set forth below. Allocatur is** DENIED **as to the**

**remaining issue. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are :** 

**(1) Whether, in an issue of first impression and of criti cal statewide**  **importance, the Superior Court Majority violated long standing precedent**  **and deviated from existing law when it read out of P ennsylvania’s Autism**  **Insurance Act a legislatively-created exception that per mitted**  **Independence, like all other insurers, to apply general policy exclusions**  **when making coverage determinations for autism-based ser vices?** 

**(2) Whether, in an issue of first impression and statewid e importance, the**  **Superior Court’s reliance on the Pennsylvania Insurance D epartment’s**  **interpretation — which conflicts with the plain languag e of Act 62 — is**  **erroneous and cannot be said to salvage the Superior C ourt Majority’s** 

**incorrect result?**

**The Application for Leave to File Post-Allocatur Commu nication in the Form of a** 

**Reply is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 6, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                 

*1. James G. Fitzgerald,*                     Barrington Hills, Illinois; and Jane M. Fitzgerald; Andrew James Fitzgerald Irrevocable Trust, James G. Fitzgerald as trustee; Timothy Edward Fitzgerald Irrevocable Trust, James G. Fitzgerald as trustee; Gerald F. Fitzgerald Jr.; Thomas Gosselin Fitzgerald, Jr., Trust, Thomas G. Fitzgerald as trustee; Lauren Webb Fitzgerald Trust, Thomas G. Fitzgerald as trustee; Julie Schauer, all of Inverness, Illinois, and Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Palatine, Illinois; to acquire shares of Southern Wisconsin Bancshares Corp., Mineral Point, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers Savings Bank, Mineral Point, Wisconsin.                 

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-24360 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 63     | 655    | -754   | 7      | -21    | 17     | 0      | -8     | -1     | -3    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -1     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4603 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4603

To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON, NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR 
              OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to staple fibers of viscose 
rayon, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Contacts. WIThwhom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National BusilUl~SAircraft Association Eli Corti bl3!tA ~

Rl'giomll Airline Associantlll DiIV£::Loiterer k/;/oc( -

Aircraft Owners & Pilofs Assoti:ltion Robert H:lckmall f/3J04 -

ATA Craig Fabiall hhJt1j -

ATA xl Lopez (,,1»64 -

09/29106
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 30    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 14     | 37     | 8      | 14     | 20     | 21     | 8      | 11     | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 58     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Bonnie S. Biumi, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of NCL Corporation Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: March 5, 2007 By: /s/ Bonnie S. Biumi   Name:  Bonnie S. Biumi   Title:  Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE WEBB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-93-7-3, CA-97-1051-3) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Elizabeth Shackelford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Webb , Nos. CR-93-7-3; CA-97-1051-3 (D.S.C. June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Kansas Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Kansas Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023