alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Fausto E. Martinez, Respondent, v Soundtown et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Weiss, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 6, 1989, which ruled that claimant sustained an accidental injury in the course of his employment and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant, a retail store sales clerk, was severely injured when a gun accidentally discharged and a bullet struck him in the spine. Claimant brought the unregistered revolver to the store because of his concern about recent robberies in the neighborhood. One of his duties was to stand outside at closing while the manager locked the gate and safely exited in his car. When the employer discovered claimant’s possession of the gun (on the day of the accident), he told claimant not to bring the gun again because of the store’s policy against resisting robberies. The accident occurred as the store was being closed for the evening when a 16-year-old stock clerk picked up the gun to place it on a shelf. The Workers’ Compensation Board awarded claimant benefits upon determining that he sustained an accidental injury in the course of his employment.

In its challenge to the Board’s determination, the employer contends that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of employment because possession of the weapon was *593not incident to claimant’s position as a sales clerk. The record shows that claimant was expected to stand by until the other employees and manager were safely on their way home. While possession of an unlicensed weapon may have been an inappropriate response, it simply involved the manner in which his duties were performed *(see, Matter of Merchant v Pinkerton’s, Inc.,*50 NY2d 492, 497). Moreover, the risk of claimant being injured by his own handgun as the result of carelessness or foolery by a curious coemployee was a risk of employment in which the employer acquiesced *(see, Matter of Lubrano v Malinet,*65 NY2d 616, 617). Placement of the weapon on the shelf does not make claimant the sole instigator or initiator of the coemployee’s act *(see, Matter of Industrial Commr. v McCarthy,*295 NY 443, 447) nor a participant in horseplay or dangerous activities *(see, Matter of Piatek v Plymouth Rock Provision Co.,*15 AD2d 405, 406), but rather an innocent victim of another’s idle and careless curiosity *(see, Matter of Gibbs v Orange County Sheriff’s Dept.,*149 AD2d 845, 847; *see also, Matter of Burns v Merritt Eng’g Co.,*302 NY 131, 135). We therefore conclude that the record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant’s injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          34,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,335
<INVENTORY>                                     18,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,351
<PP&E>                                          82,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,398
<BONDS>                                        100,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,274)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,557
<SALES>                                        137,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,477
<CGS>                                           95,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service
 AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) hereby announces the depreciation rates for telecommunications plant for the period ended December 31, 1999.
 DATES: These rates are effective for the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 1999.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan P. Claffey, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Telecommunications Program, Rural Utilities Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4056, STOP 1590, Washington, DC 20250-1590. Telephone: (202) 720-9556.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 206(a)(3) of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 requires RUS to annually determine and publish average depreciation rates used by its borrowers for the purposes of depreciating telecommunications plant. The following chart provides those rates, compiled by RUS for the reporting period ended December 31, 1999: **Average Depreciation Rates of Rus Borrowers by Equipment Category For Period Ended December 31, 1999:**
Telecommunications plant category
Depreciation rate (percent)1. Land and Support Assets:a. Motor vehicles
15.00b. Aircraft
10.00c. Special purpose vehicles
12.00d. Garage and other work equipment
10.00e. Buildings
3.01f. Furniture and office equipment
10.00g. General purpose computers
18.572. Central Office Switching:a. Digital (a)
8.33b. Analog & electro-mechanical
10.00c. Operator systems
8.86d. Radio systems
9.50e. Circuit equipment (b)
10.003. Information Origination/Termination:a. Station apparatus
11.59b. Customer premises equipment
10.00c. Large private branch exchanges
12.50d. Public telephone terminal equipment
11.10e. Other terminal equipment
10.554. Cable and Wire Facilities:a. Aerial cable-Poles
6.67a. Aerial cable-metal
6.00b. Aerial cable-fiber
5.00c. Underground cable-metal
4.81d. Underground cable-fiber
4.82e. Buried cable-metal
5.00f. Buried cable-fiber
5.00g. Conduit systems
3.02h. Other
7.21
 Christopher A. McLean, Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.


[FR Doc. 00-25020 Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-15-U
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57816-57817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Program Services 
Development Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC) 
Announces the Following Meeting

    Name: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Pre-
Application Meeting for Announcement Number 01010.
    Objective of Meeting: Prepare prospective applicants for the new 
PRAMS Cooperative Agreement Announcement Number 01010 to be

[[Page 57817]]

posted in the Federal Register approximately October 1, 2000. The new 
PRAMS Cooperative Agreement #01010 has additional components from the 
previously posted cooperative agreements #659 and #99070. Applicants 
can apply for core and/or enhanced PRAMS activities or a one time 
(point-in-time) survey. In this meeting, CDC will articulate the 
details of the changes and additions made in the Cooperative Agreement 
#01010 to prospective applicants. Applicants are strongly encouraged to 
attend the meeting.
    Time and Date: 10 am to 5 pm, October 30, 2000.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select, 130 Clairmont Ave., Decatur, GA 30030, 
404-371-0204.
    Other Options: Prospective applicants may opt to tele-conference if 
unable to travel to the meeting site. For further details regarding 
tele-conferencing for this meeting please contact: Shawna Ward, phone: 
770-488-5619.
    Contact Person for More Information: Mary Rogers, National Center 
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of 
Reproductive Health, Program Services Development Branch, [mailing 
address] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Attn: Mary Rogers, 
MS-K22, 4770 Buford Hwy., N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 
770-488-5220, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3beb9a1c0b3b0b7b0ddb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="622f283051222126214c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>. 
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 20, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-24621 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DANIEL LUKE SPUCK,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 131 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DANIEL LUKE SPUCK,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 132 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Lower 48 States Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Lower 48 States Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 868   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 557    | 232    | 353    | 16     | 158    | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Lower 48 States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Lower 48 States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 344   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,470  | 1,482  | 1,234  | 1,923  | 2,641  | 984    | 1,518  | 2,385  | 2,019  | 2,855 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,142  | 4,147  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

January 14, 20 19

No. 04

- 18

- 00478

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00479

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Miguel Marco MELENDEZ

, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 6467 & 6468 Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s first motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s bri ef is due February 7, 2019.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Emissions 

## Widows Creek Fossil Plant
What TVA is doing about emissions at Widows Creek TVA has taken a number of steps to make the efficient generation of power at Widows Creek as clean as possible: Units 7 and 8 are equipped with wet limestone scrubbers to removeparticulates and sulfur dioxide emissions. These units also use lowNOx burners to reduce the production of nitrogen oxides. •
TVA has installed selective catalytic reduction systems on units 7 and 8 to further reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by about 90 percent. • As of Oct. 1, 2011, the plant’s six other units have been idled — earlier than their retirement is required by an agreement with t he Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and other parties. •

Carbon dioxide

Click for raw data View more information on carbon dioxide and what TVA is doing about it. Emissions Data For data on calendar year emissions at each of TVA’s fossil plants, choose from the menu below. Fossil Plants

General Information For general information on individual calendar year emissions choose from the menu below. Emissions Page 1 of 1 TVA: Widows Creek Fossil Plant Emissions

7/23/2012 http://www.tva.gov/environment/air/widcreek.htm
# The Attorney General ofTexas
August 24. 1981 MARK WHITE Attorney General
HonorableJames S.McGrath CriminalDistrict Attorney JeffersonCounty, Texas P.O. Box 2555 Beaumont,Texas 77704 OpinionNo.MU-362 Re: Terminationof county employees

DearMr. McGrath: You ask the question: Does a single commissioner acting as road and bridge administrator have the power to discharge an employee? You have informed us that by "road and bridge administrator"you mean county commissioner acting as ex officio road commissioner pursuant to article 6762,V.T.C.S. This statutewas amendedby Senate Bill 1242 enacted by the regular session of the sixty-seventh legislature and effective June 16, 1981, when it was signed by the Governor. It now provides that in all counties the members of the commissioners court shall be ex officio road commissioners of their respectiveprecincts. This provision is not automatically effective, but must be adoptedby the court pursuant to article 6769,V.T.C.S. Article 6763, V.T.C.S., as amended by Senate Bill 1242, provides in part: Subject to authorization by the commissioners

court, each ex otficio road commissioner may employ persons for positions in the conrmissioner's precinct paid from the county road and bridge funds. Each ex officio road commissioner may discharge any county employee working in the commissioner's precinct if the employee is paid from county road and bridge funds. Under the circumstances stated in article 6763, V.T.C.S., a single commissioner acting as ex officio road con@ssioner has power to dischargean employee.

P. 1210James S.McGrath - Page 2 (MU-362)

You next ask whether an official appointed by the commissioners court has power to discharge an employee. You do not inquire about a particular official, sowe must answer in general terms. Where the court is statutorilyauthorized to appoint an official, there must be statutory authority for the official to hire and fire employees. Where the legislaturehas authorized the delegation of the court'spowers, ithas done so by express legislationas to the powers to be exercisedby a subordinate. Guerrav. Rodriguez, 239 S.W.2d 915 (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1951, no writ)(construing article 6713, V.T.C.S.). Sf?e, e. ., V.T;C.S. art. 4478--4485 (hospital superintendent). The answer to your question depends in each case on the statutesdefining thepowers of the particular official.

SUMMARY A single county cormnissioneracting as road commissioner pursuant to article 6762, V.T.C.S., has the power to discharge an employee paid from county road and bridge funds. Whether an official appointedby the commissioners court has power to discharge an employee depends on the statute governing the official in question.
&&

Attorney General of Texas JOHN W. FAINTER,JR. FirstAssistantAttorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III ExecutiveAssistantAttorney General Preparedby Susan Garrison Assistant AttorneyGeneral APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison,Chairman James Allison Jon Bible Rick Gilpin JimMoellinger Bruce Youngblood

p. 1211