alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the
filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Coal Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s
knowledge:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and




(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
      periods expressed in the
Report.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to International Coal Group, Inc. and will
be retained by International Coal Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ BENNETT K.
      HATFIELDName:
            
            Bennett K.
      HatfieldTitle:
            
            President and Chief Executive
      Officer/s/ BRADLEY W.
      HARRISName:
            
            Bradley W.
      HarrisTitle:
            
            Senior Vice President, Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer)





Date: February27,2009
Exhibit 99.1








PVH CORP. ANNOUNCES LEADERSHIP UPDATE





NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)—August 30, 2022-- PVH Corp. (NYSE: PVH) today announced that


Trish Donnelly, Chief Executive Officer, PVH Americas & Calvin Klein Global, will be leaving PVH to pursue other opportunities. She will remain in an advisory role through November 30, 2022 to facilitate the transition.





PVH intends to separate her responsibilities into two roles to strengthen the Company’s ability to execute its PVH+ Plan: a regional leadership role for PVH Americas and a global brand leadership role for Calvin Klein . The Company has launched a global search for both positions.  In the interim, Stefan Larsson, Chief Executive Officer of PVH Corp., will lead PVH Americas and Calvin Klein Global, working closely with the leadership of both organizations and their teams.





Larsson commented: “In the current environment, it is critical to redouble our focus on execution to unlock the full potential of the Americas region and also to continue to grow the Calvin Klein brand globally.  We will significantly improve our ability to execute the PVH+ Plan by splitting these roles and bringing on leaders with different skill sets who can devote their full attention to these important roles.“





“On behalf of everyone at PVH, I want to thank Trish for her strong commitment, hard work, and dedication to our people, brands, and businesses. She played a key role in helping navigate a challenging retail environment as we emerged from the height of the pandemic. She also brought together a very capable group of leaders in both organizations who are dedicated to driving the execution of the PVH+ Plan. We wish her the very best in her next chapter.”





Donnelly commented: “I am extremely proud of how the Americas and Calvin Klein teams have come together, and I deeply admire their passion for our brands and commitment to growing our businesses. I am thankful for the opportunity to work with so many fantastic, talented people and wish them every success in the future.”





About PVH Corp.





PVH is one of the world’s largest and most admired fashion companies, connecting with consumers in over 40 countries. Our global iconic brands include Calvin Klein  and  TOMMY HILFIGER . Our 140-year history is built on the strength of our brands, our team and our commitment to drive fashion forward for good. That’s the Power of Us. That’s the Power of PVH.





Follow us on Facebook , Instagram , Twitter and LinkedIn .





Cindy Leggett-Flynn


communications@pvh.com
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 VWR Funding, Inc. Subsidiaries
 as of 12/31/07
 Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationVWR International, LLC
    
    DelawareVWR Funding International Holdings, Inc
    
    DelawareVWR International Holdings, Inc
    
    DelawareVWR Management Services, LLC
    
    DelawareVWR, Inc
    
    DelawareWards Natural Science Establishment, LLC
    
    DelawareScience Kit, LLC
    
    DelawareBoreal Laboratories, Ltd.
    
    CanadaVWR International Europe S.ar.L.
    
    LuxembourgVWR International North America S.ar.L.
    
    LuxembourgVWR International Co
    
    CanadaVWR Advanced Instruments, LLC
    
    Puerto RicoVWR International Europe bvba
    
    BelgiumVWR International, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoServicios Cientificos Especializados, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoVWR International Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeVWR International Immobilien GmbH
    
    GermanyVWR International bvba
    
    BelgiumSino Chemical Company (Pte.) Ltd.
    
    SingaporeVWR Lab Products Private Ltd.
    
    IndiaVWR Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaVWR InternationalMaterial de Laboratório, Lda
    
    PortugalVWR International B.V.
    
    NetherlandsVWR International S.r.l.
    
    ItalyVWR International Ltd.
    
    UKVWR International GmbH
    
    AustriaVWR International AG
    
    SwitzerlandHalmahera Ltd.
    
    IrelandFreerisk Ltd.
    
    IrelandVWR International S.A.S.
    
    FranceVWR International GmbH
    
    GermanyVWR International Eurolab, S.L.
    
    SpainVWR International AB
    
    SwedenOmnilabo International B.V.
    
    NetherlandsOmnilabo International N.V.
    
    BelgiumA.G.B. Scientific Apparatus Ltd.
    
    N. IrelandVWRI UK Pension Trustees Limited
    
    UKA.G.B. Scientific Ltd.
    
    IrelandA.G.B. Scientific Solutions Ltd.
    
    UKLabsys Ltd.
    
    IrelandA.G.B. Products Ltd.
    
    IrelandKMF Administration GmbH
    
    GermanyGebruder Faust GmbH
    
    GermanyKMF Laborchemie Handels GmbH
    
    GermanyVWR International ApS
    
    DenmarkVWR International Oy
    
    FinlandVWR International AS
    
    NorwayLabIT Solutions AB
    
    SwedenKEBO Lab AB
    
    SwedenBIE & Berntsen A-S
    
    Denmark
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7762

DONALD L. SPENCER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. GARRAGHTY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-509)

Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: September 8, 1998

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Spencer

v. Garraghty, No. CA-97-509 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1997). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4839 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sulfur black 1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sulfur black 

1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SULFUR BLACK 1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Sulfur black 1) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4839 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### TIPTON v. STATE.

No. 24667.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1950.

McCarthy, Collins & Snodgrass, George S. McCarthy, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of transporting whiskey in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed by the jury at 75 days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $600.

The record is before us without a statement of facts and there are no bills of exception.

Appellant contends that the information is fatally defective for failure to allege that the election which resulted in fixing the status of Hockley County as a dry area was properly ordered by the Commissioners Court.

We overrule such contention.

The information alleges the transportation of whiskey in Hockley County “after an election had been held by the qualified voters of said County in accordance with law to determine whether or not the sale of such intoxicating liquor should be prohibited' in said" County and such election had resulted in favor of prohibiting the sale of such intoxicating liquor in said County and the Commissioners Court of said County had canvassed the election returns, and had duly made, passed and entered its order declaring the result of said election prohibiting the sale of such intoxicating liquor in said County, as required by law, which said order had been published for the time and in the manner required by law in force at the time of said election; said election having heretofore been held on the 28th day of December, A.D. 1940, and the sale of said type of alcoholic beverage has not been legalized in said political subdivision by any local option election held in such political subdivision since said time.”

*227Such form of pleading was suggested by this court as correct and proper in the case of Shaffer v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 427, 99 S.W.2d 929. See also Humphreys v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 383, 99 S.W.2d 600.

As stated by Judge Davidson in Spencer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 174, 175: “We cannot find ourselves in the position of saying that the Commissioners Court * * * canvassed the returns and declared the result of an election which they had not called.”

Our attention is directed to the case of Brown v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 3, 117 S.W.2d 107, and to the more recent case of Whatley v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 358, 207 S.W.2d 402.

Such cases, in so far as .they may be construed as announcing a rule of pleading contrary to that here approved, are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, P. J., absent.

Opinion approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2632
KIRSTEN M. NOAKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LESLIE P. FORD; DOES 1 Through 3, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-619-R) Submitted: March 17, 1998 Decided: March 31, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kirsten M. Noakes, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her action under the Federal Tort Claims Act under both Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt's opinion and find no reversible error. We modify the dismissal, however, to fall only under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and to be without prejudice to Appellant's opportunity to exhaust her administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) (1994); McNeil v. United States , 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
|                                                                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                       
|Nebraska Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 4, 2007                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
| /s/William                B. Timmerman                           |   |
| William                B. Timmerman                              |   |
| Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                                             |   |
No. 06-15-00121-CR

IN THE S IXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

BILLY JOE SELMAN

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the County Court at Law, Hill County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M0890-14

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE S’ BRIEF

To the Honorable Court of Appeals:

Appell ee, The State of Texas, by and through her County Attorney, file s this

Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Appell ee ’s Brief, and in support of this

motion states the following:

1. Appell ee’s brief in this case was due on November 13, 2015.

2. This Motion is filed pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d) in compliance with

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1).

3. This is Appell ee ’ s first motion for extension of time in which to file her brief.

4. Appellant is requesting an extension of time for the filing of her brief of forty

five (45) days to December 28, 2015. ACCEPTED 06-15-00121-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 12/14/2015 11:56:13 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK5. Attorney for Appellee is a two

- attorney prosecutor office, and the Assistant

County Attorney position has been open since September of 2015, leaving one prosecutor

to handle the entire workload of the office

.
For the foregoing reason , Appell ee , the State of Texas , respectfully request s that

this Court grant an extension of time of forty

- five ( 45 ) days for the filing of Appell ee ’ s

Brief to December 28 , 20 1 5

.

Respectfully submitted,

THE STATE OF TEXAS

/s/ R. David Holmes

R. D avid H olmes County Attorney State Bar No. 24035160 P.O. Box 253 Hillsboro, Texas 76645 254

- 582

- 4047 FAX 254

- 582

- 4013 dholmes@co.hill.tx.us

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEECERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of this Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s

Brief was served in accordance with rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

on each party or that party ’ s lead counsel as follows:

Party: Billy Joe Selman Lead attorney: Ricardo De Los Santos Address of service: 202 S. Main St., Cleburne, TX 76033 Method of service: via email Date of service: November 25, 2015

/s/ R. David Holmes