alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_140146.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


THIS IS AN AMENDING AGREEMENT made this 3rd day of April, 2019.


 


B E T W E E N:


CEN BIOTECH INC.


(Buyer)


(herein “CEN”)


 


-     -and –


 


STEVAN POKRAJAC and TESLA DIGITAL INC. and


TESLA DIGITAL GLOBAL GROUP INC.

(Seller)


(herein “PTT”)


 


WHEREAS the Parties have entered into a Sale Purchase Agreement on August 31st, 2016;.


 


AND WHEREAS the Parties have further entered into an Amending Agreement made March 29th, 2018 (the “March Agreement”);


 


AND WHEREAS the Parties have further entered into an Amending Agreement made September 28th , 2018 (the “March Agreement”);


 


AND WHEREAS paragraph 2 of the said Amending Agreement provides that “...the closing date is December 15th, 2018”;


 


AND WHEREAS it is desirous that paragraph 2 of the said Amending Agreement be amended in accordance with the terms herein.


 


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR and the agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficient of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto mutually covenant and agree as follows:


 


	
			1.

				
			Attached hereto and marked as Schedule “A” is the Amending Agreement dated September 28th, 2018. The Parties agree that the September said Agreement is in full force and effect and legally binding on the Parties.

			



 


	
			2.

				
			Paragraph 2 of the September Agreement shall be amended so that the reference therein to December 15th, 2018 is changed to be “December 31st, 2019”

			
	 	 
	 	deleted and a new paragraph shall be inserted as follows:
	 	 
	 	“Transfer/issue one million (1,000,000) shares in the common stock of CEN Biotech Inc. to be listed on public stock exchange.  This is in lieu of payment of $5,000,000.00 U.S. dollars referenced above. The closing date is on or before December 31st, 2019.”



 


	
			3.

				
			All other terms and conditions of the Sale Purchase Agreement and Amending March Agreement are to remain in full force and effect mutatis mutandis.

			



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set their hand and seals.


 


	SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED	}	CEN BIOTECH INC.
	in the presence of:	}	 
	 	}	__/s/ Bahige Chaaban__________________
	 	}	per: Bahige Bassem Chaaban,
	 	}	President
	 	}	I have authority to bind the Corporation
	 	}	 
	 	}	 
	 	}	_____/s/ Steven Pokrajac__________
	 	}	STEVEN POKRAJAC
	 	}	 
	 	}	TESLA DIGITAL INC.
	 	}	 
	 	}	____/s/ Steven Pokrajac _________
	 	}	per: STEVEN POKRAJAC
	 	}	President
	 	}	I have authority to bind the Corporation
	 	}	 
	 	}	TESLA DIGITAL GLOBAL GROUP INC.
	 	}	 
	 	}	_______/s/ Steven Pokrajac _________
	 	}	Per: STEVEN POKRAJAC
	 	}	President
	 	}	I have authority to bind the Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4495 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4495

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DICHLORPROP-P ACID, DICHLORPROP-P DIMETHYLAMINE SALT, AND 
              DICHLORPROP-P 2-ETHYLHEXYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 726 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 023 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _____________________________ FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) April 5, 2010   PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)  Registrants telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)  Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:  ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))  ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))   ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS On April 5, 2010, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) issued a press release announcing receipt of early termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 waiting period for the acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger B.V.  A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.  ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS (d)  Exhibits. ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated April 5, 2010.      SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION  By: /s/ Mark D. Fischer Mark D. Fischer Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  Date: April 5, 2010  Exhibit Index


|        |                              
|------- | -----------------------------
|Exhibit | Description                  
|99.1    | Press Release, April 5, 2010.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the following Registration Statements of Warner Music Group Corp. of our report dated November 26, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Warner Music Group Corp., and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Warner Music Group Corp., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007: 

1) Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333-127900) 

2) Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333-127899) 

New York, NY 

November 26, 2007 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), rendered September 23, 1985, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the defendant’s arrest was supported by probable cause *(see, People v Allen,*138 AD2d 612). Suppression of the physical evidence was properly denied as the defendant lacked standing to challenge the propriety of a search of the public area where he was found *(see, People v Ponder,*54 NY2d 160).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions *366and conclude that they are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 April 28, 2009 Lawrence Odle, Director Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001North Central Avenue, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Dear Mr. Odle: We received your March 11,2009,request for delegation of Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) pursuant to the Code ofFederal Regulations, Title 40 (40 CFR), Parts 60,61, and 63. In this letter, we are responding only to your request for delegation of40 CFR Part 63 NESHAP. You will receive a separate letter addressing delegation of40 CFR Part 60NSPS and Part 61NESHAP. In response to your request, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (EPA) hereby grants to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department formal delegation of the following 40 CFR Part 63NESHAP, as they existed onJuly 1,2006: Subpart DDDD -NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products Subpart DDDDD
-NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters Regarding any other 40 CFR Part 63NESHAP previously delegated to Maricopa County, this letter is also delegating any amendments made to those NESHAP as ofJuly 1, 2006. These NESHAP are being delegated in accordance with the November 1, 1999, Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Maricopa County and EPA regarding the delegation of NESHAP. As set forth in the MOA, these delegations are effective upon the date of this letter and EPA will publish a future Federal Register notice to codify these delegations into the Code ofFederal Regulations.
We appreciate the Maricopa County Air Quality Department's efforts to implement the federal air toxics program and hope to continue working with you to reduce emissions of air toxics in Maricopa County. If you have any questions about this delegation, please call me at (415) 947-8715 or have your staffcontact Mae Wang at (415) 947-4 124. Sincerely,

\ 

### .' ~\eborah Jordan Director, Air Division
cc: Jo Crumbaker, Maricopa County AQD

Pn'nred on Recycled Paper
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of ServicesAcquisition Corp. International, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 27, 2006 |   | /s/ STEVEN R.  BERRARD                                  |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Steven R. Berrard                                       |
|                       |   | *Chief  Executive Officer*                              |
|                       |   | *(Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial* |
|                       |   | *and  Accounting Officer)*                              |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### Ex parte DULANEY.

No. A—1277.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 18, 1947.

Albert C. Dulaney, pro se.

Raymond Gerhardt, of San Antonio, for the Judge and others.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding in which the relator, Albert C. Dulaney, seeks release from an order of the District Court of the 73rd Judicial District of Bexar County, adjudging him to be in contempt and committing him to jail. It arose in connection with the trial of catise No. F-9883 in such court styled John G. Kircher et ux. v. Albert C. Dulaney et al., wherein the relator, who was present in open court, was ordered to produce in court a certain promissory note dated December 1, 1945, executed by John G. Kircher et ux., payable to.Albert C. Dulaney, Trustee, or give evidence showing the present physical location of the note and' the owners thereof, which the relator refused to do. He was thereupon in open court adjudged to be in contempt and ordered imprisoned in the county jail until such time as he shall produce the note in court “or produce evidence satisfactory to the court showing where said note may be found, and in whose hands the said note is at the present time”.

1⁄8 It is the settled law of this State, as well as in other jurisdictions, that in order to obtain the relief here sought the . relator must show that the order or writ of commitment is absolutely void. To sustain that burden it *must*affirmatively appear that the court was without jurisdic*204tion,’ and that as a result thereof the relator is restrained of his liberty without due process of law. Ex parte Lipscomb, 111 Tex. 409, 239 S.W. 1101; Ex parte Duncan, 127 Tex. 507, 95 S.W.2d 675; Ex parte Hughes, 133 Tex. 505, 129 S.W .2d 270; Ex parte Genecov, 143 Tex. 476, 186 S.W.2d 225, 160 A.L.R. 1099. That burden the relator has failed to discharge. On the contrary it appears that the court had jurisdiction to enter the order and issue the commitment, and thus no element of the principle of due process has been violated.

Therefore, the relator is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Bexar County.
#### Vera Person-Aaron, Appellant, v Dennis P. O’Connor et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Turret, J.), entered on October 27, 1989, which granted defendants’ motion for an order changing venue from Bronx County to Suffolk County, and which denied plaintiff’s motion for an order retaining Bronx County as venue, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion for a change of venue was properly granted on the ground that the originally designated venue in Bronx County is improper inasmuch as neither party resides there. (CPLR 510 [1].)

While plaintiff seeks to retain venue in Bronx County on the basis of her own convenience and the convenience of a member of her immediate family as a liability witness, neither the convenience of parties nor that of members of their families may be considered. *(Ithaca Peripherals v Sequoia Pac. Sys. Corps.,*141 AD2d 909, 910.) Similarly, venue in Bronx County cannot be based upon the convenience of treating physicians, since plaintiff did not show that those physicians reside in Bronx County, and since she did not set forth their expected testimony *(Moye v H.L. Green, Inc.,*149 AD2d 242). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4793 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4793

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5-Dimethylhydantoin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Ross of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5-Dimethylhydantoin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-DIBROMO-5-DIMETHYLHYDANTOIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,3-Dibromo-5-      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Dimethylhydantoin                                                 12/31/2015
                          (CAS No. 77-48-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.21.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000091741
<NAME>                        Sonesta Inernational Hotels Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                       148
<INVENTORY>                                      1,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,529
<PP&E>                                         112,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,841
<BONDS>                                         46,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        294
<COMMON>                                         3,488
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,371
<SALES>                                         13,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,009
<CGS>                                            3,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28



</TABLE>
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023