alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4809 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4809

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric dispensing 
                               blenders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric dispensing 
                               blenders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC DISPENSING BLENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Self-contained,     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          electromechanical                                                 12/31/2015
                          household
                          blenders with a
                          built-in
                          dispensing spout
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8509.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

DEPUTY 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BY: ________________________________ August 02, 2022

 JU

Case 5:20-cv-00205-OLG Document 86 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
King Owyang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ King Owyang
                                         -------------------------------
                                         King Owyang
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         November 12, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-255-012]

Take notice that on September 19, 2000, TransColorado Gas Transmission Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of September 16, 2000:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 21

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 22

TransColorado states that the filing is being made in compliance with the Commission's letter order issued March 20, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-255-000. The tendered tariff sheets revised TransColorado's Tariff to implement a new negotiated-rate firm transportation service agreements between Dominion Exploration & Production and an amendment in TransColorado's present contract with Questar Energy Trading. TransColorado requested waiver of 18 CFR 154.207 so that the tendered tariff sheets may become effective September 16, 2000.

TransColorado stated that a copy of this filing has been served upon all parties to this proceeding, TransColorado's customers, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission and New Mexico Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24990  Filed 9-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4857 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4857

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vinylidene chloride-
              methyl methacrylate-acrylonitrile copolymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vinylidene chloride-
              methyl methacrylate-acrylonitrile copolymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE-METHYL METHACRYLATE-ACRYLONITRILE 
              COPOLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Vinylidene chloride-methyl 
methacrylate-acrylonitrile copolymer) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**The Board of DirectorsDiscovery Holding Company:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the followingregistration statements of Discovery Holding Company of ourreport dated March 23, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Discovery Holding Company as ofDecember 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations and comprehensive earnings (loss),stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearsin the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2005, annual report onForm 10-K ofDiscovery Holding Company.           **Registration**  **Form** **Statement No.** **Description**         S-8  333-127715   2005 Incentive Plan     S-8  333-127712   Transitional Stock Adjustment Plan     S-8  333-127713   2005 Nonemployee Director Incentive Plan      KPMG LLPDenver, ColoradoMarch 23, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4556 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4556

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,6-DIMETHYL-2-PYRIMIDINAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        4,6-dimethyl-2-     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          pyrimidinamine                                                    12/31/2015
                          (CAS No. 767-15-
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2933.59.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Barrett, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered December 12, 1988, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary in the first degree and assault in the third degree.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly considered those factors necessary to determine a *Sandoval*motion *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371) and properly exercised its discretionary power in so doing *(see, People v Blim,*58 AD2d 672). Furthermore, given the overwhelming proof of guilt, the admissions at most could be considered harmless error *(see, People v Shields,*46 NY2d 764). With *625respect to defendant’s claim that the element of intent was not proven, the mere fact that evidence was offered in support of his assertion of intoxication simply created a fact question which, based on the evidence before it, the jury resolved against defendant *(see, People v Danaher,*115 AD2d 905). Finally, we reject defendant’s contention that the 5-to-15-year prison sentence imposed on the burglary conviction was excessive. The court considered the facts and all other relevant material before pronouncing sentence *(see, People v Hochberg,*62 AD2d 239).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4986 

To suspend temporarily the duty on baby or child carriers designed for 

use on bicycles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on baby or child carriers 

designed for use on bicycles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BABY OR CHILD CARRIERS DESIGNED FOR USE 

4 ON BICYCLES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Baby or child carriers designed for use on bicycles 

(provided for in subheading 8714.99.80) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4986 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### DOTSON v. STATE.

No. 23443.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1946.

*373Preston P. Reynolds, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, declining to entertain appellant’s application for a trial as to his insanity after conviction based solely upon the affidavit of his mother that he has become insane since the date of his conviction.

 It appears from the transcript before us that appellant was indicted on September 15, 1944, for the offense of murder with malice; that on the 19th day of January, 1945, he was tried in the District Court of Dallas County for said offense and his punishment was assessed at death. From that judgment he appealed to this court. The case was affirmed by this court on November 7, 1945, and a rehearing denied on January 9, 1946, 191 S.W.2d 38. Thereafter, on the 3d day of June, 1946, appellant, by and through his attorney, filed an application in the court of his conviction praying for a stay of sentence and execution for the reason that he had become insane since his trial and is now insane. This application is supported only by the affidavit of his mother, Mrs. Viola Dotson, and is made a part of the application. The trial court, after examining the application and the affidavit, overruled the same on the ground that the defendant had failed to present the “affidavit of the Superintendent of some State Institution for the treatment of the insane, or the affidavit of not less than two licensed and regularly practicing physicians of the State of Texas, or the affidavit of the prison physician or warden of the Penal Institution wherein the defendant is in prison, or the County Health Officer of the County where the defendant was finally convicted,” etc. These are mandatory requisites which are provided by Art. 922, C.C.P. Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P. art. 922, and must be pursued before the trial court would have jurisdiction of the matter in determining the issue of insanity. Inasmuch as the affidavit in the present instance is wholly insufficient, the trial court was justified in overruling the same. See Stephens v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 184 S.W.2d 284.

The order of the trial court overruling the application is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

■The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jose Fransisco Mendoza-Navarro v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00706-CR

Trial court case number: 1542074

Trial court: 176th District Court of Harris County

In September 2019, appointed counsel David L. Garza filed a motion to withdraw and the 

accompanying brief required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The State filed a 

waiver of response on November 26, 2019. After receiving a request to access the record, the Court 

issued an order directing the trial court clerk to provide appellant with access to the record.

Purporting to act as appellant’s retained counsel, Peyton Z. Peeples III, tendered on January 24, 

2020, “Appellant’s Response to Anders Brief.” Because two attorneys had made appearances

claiming to represent appellant, this Court issued an order requiring Peeples either to file a motion

to substitute or to present the Court with authority permitting a retained attorney to file a response

to an Anders brief. Peeples filed a motion to substitute on February 3, 2020; however, the motion

states that Peeples wishes to be substituted only to respond to the Anders brief.

The provision for filing an Anders response is to permit the indigent appellant to point out

“any reason why he thinks there are non-frivolous issues to be raised on his behalf, notwithstanding

his appointed counsel’s evaluation of the record.” Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2014). The Anders procedure does not contemplate retained counsel filing the response to

appointed counsel’s brief. Accordingly, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and 

remanding to the trial court to determine whether to grant Garza’s motion to withdraw and appoint 

new counsel on appeal, or permit retained counsel Peeples to be substituted as appellant’s counsel. 

If Peeples were permitted to act as appellant’s counsel, he would represent appellant not only in 

response to an Anders brief because, if Garza withdrew, the Anders brief he filed would no longer 

be considered. 

A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on March 5, 2020, indicated that the trial court 

granted Garza’s motion to withdraw, and permitted Peeples to serve as retained substitute counsel 

on appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated on the active docket. David L. Garza’s motion to 

withdraw has been granted and the Anders brief filed by Garza is stricken. Peyton Z. Peeples III 
will serve as retained counsel on appeal. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed within 30 days from 

the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __April 9, 2020___
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                            SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC.
                         1999 ACHIEVEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

         Section 2 is amended effective January 2, 2000, by deleting
subparagraph (f) in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following
new subparagraph (f):

                  "(f) `Key Employee' shall mean any salaried employee of the
                  Company or of any affiliate."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed pursuant to
resolutions adopted by the Management Compensation and Organization Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company on May 8, 2000.

                                 SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC.



                                 By: /s/Gracie P. Coleman
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Gracie P. Coleman
                                     Senior Vice President-Human Resources
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 66     | 1      | 13     | 5      | 0      | 4      | 0      | W      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

EXAFER LTD,

Plaintiff, 

-vsMICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

CAUSE NO.:

A-20-CV-00131-ADA

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Before the court is the above-styled and numbered cause. It appears to the Court that the 

above-styled and numbered cause should be transferred from the docket of the Honorable Alan. 

D. Albright, United States District Judge, by random assignment to the docket the Honorable Lee 

Yeakel, United States District Judge, both judges having consented to the transfer.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered cause is 

TRANSFERRED to the docket of the Honorable Lee Yeakel, United States District Judge for all 

purposes. Pursuant to the most recent Order Assigning the Business of the Court, the Clerk shall 

credit this case to the percentage of business of the receiving Judge.

SIGNED this the 12th day of November 2021.

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00131-RP Document 97 Filed 11/12/21 Page 1 of 1