alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 43     | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5,546 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,558  | 9,583  | 8,893  | 5,439  | 5,787  | 3,114  | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-030:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 22     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Arkansas Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Arkansas Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 16     | 15     | 11     | 12     | 11     | 16     | 16     | 13     | 9     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 5      | 4      | 4      | 6      | 6      | 4      | 7      | 5      | 5     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 2      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
From: Khan, Mohammed

Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 7:57:42 AM (UTC‐05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Subject: Public Meeting ‐ Residential Furnace Fan Test Procedure

To Whom It May Concern:

I would like to inform you that the U.S. Department of Energy will hold a public

meeting on June 15, 2012, to hear comments from interested parties concerning the

DOE's proposal for new test procedures for measuring the energy consumption of

residential furnace fans.  Details of the public meeting including time,

location, and procedures are included in the applicable notice of proposed

rulemaking which can be found on the DOE web page using the URL provided below.

Interested parties may also use the below URL to register to participate in an

optional webinar.  The meeting agenda and presentation material are forthcoming

and will be available on the DOE web page.

Thank you.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/furnace_fan

s.html

Mohammed Khan

Building Technologies Program

202.586.7892

202.586.4617 fax
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10288 

Conference Calendar

 

WILMER MURPHY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD M. STEWART, Correctional Officer III;

JOHN MOON, Counsel Substitute; VINCE WALKER,

Captain; R.O. LAMPERT, Warden; JAMES M. DUKE,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-136

- - - - - - - - - -

Decmeber 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Wilmer Murphy, Texas prisoner # 793893, appeals the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). He argues that the district court did

not address the real issues of his complaint--the failure to

investigate false charges, refusal to call witnesses,

insufficiency of evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Murphy has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel on
No. 99-10288

-2-

appeal and a motion for injunctive relief to compel prison

officials to return legal materials and personal property and to

provide copies of his medical records. These motions are DENIED.

Murphy has failed to meet the requirements of Heck v.

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). See Clarke v. Stalder,

154 F.3d 186, 189 (5th Cir. 1998)(holding that Heck includes

adverse rulings in prison disciplinary proceedings), cert.

denied, 119 S. Ct. 1052 (1999). Murphy has failed to state a

claim for retaliatory interference as well. See Johnson v.

Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir. 1997); Woods v. Smith, 60

F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Murphy’s appeal is

DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal counts as a strike against

Murphy. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir.

1996). This court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as another

strike. Id. Should Murphy accumulate three strikes, he may not

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). Murphy is cautioned to review any pending appeals to

ensure that they do not raise frivolous issues.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

DENIED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Wanton, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Geraldo Garcia, Appellant.

Judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J., at suppression hearing, jury trial, and sentence), rendered July 1 and August 3, 1987, convicting defendants of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing them to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 15 years to life on the first two counts and 1 to 3 years on the remaining count, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly denied the motion seeking suppression of physical evidence. Defendants’ arrest was supported by probable cause. The informant’s knowledge was based on personal observation. *(Cf., People v Elwell,*50 NY2d 231, 234-235.) The arresting officers may not have observed defendants take any action that, standing alone, was indicative of criminal activity, but the detectives’ testimony at the hearing contains no suggestion that the informant had said the defendants were merely present in the apartment where the cocaine was packaged. *(People v Martin,*32 NY2d 123.)

Wanton’s memorandum containing the notes of a drug transaction was properly introduced into evidence. Together with his phone book, the memorandum served to connect Wanton to Jean-Jacques, the codefendant with whom the police had been negotiating. It also served to negate Wanton’s twin claims that he did not share Jean-Jacques’ intent and that his presence on the scene when the drugs were supposed to have been transferred was coincidental. *(People v Jackson,*39 NY2d 64.)

Defendants have not established that they are entitled to a new trial because of the prosecutor’s summation. While the prosecutor should not have referred to Grand Jury testimony which had not been introduced into evidence at trial, any prejudice was obviated by the trial court’s prompt curative instruction. *(People v Galloway, 54*NY2d 396, 398-399.)

Defendants also fail to show that this is one of the rare cases in which application of the statutory sentencing scheme *203constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. *(Cf., People v Broadie,*37 NY2d 100, *cert denied*423 US 950.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
Experimental:

HPLC Conditions (TLF)

Column: Micro Solv Cogent Bidentate C8 Column pore size; 4 μm Column temperature: 40°C Detector: Agilent 1100 series refractive Index Mobile phase A: 55% Methanol/45% Water containin g 2mL Trifluoroacetic acid (v/v/v)

Flow rate: 0.5 mL/minute Injection volume: 6 μL sample Stop Time 20 min
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50615

Summary Calendar

DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,

Plaintiff−Appellant,

versus

BERRY AVIATION, INCORPORATED,

Defendant−Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 6:19-CV-351

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We examine our appellate jurisdiction on our motion if necessary. Mejia 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50615 Document: 00515152397 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/09/2019
No. 19-50615

2

v. Whitaker, 913 F.3d 482, 487 (5th Cir. 2019). The plaintiff claims patent 

infringement. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) gives the Federal Circuit exclusive 

jurisdiction over appeals in any action arising under an Act of Congress relating to patents.

The appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

 Case: 19-50615 Document: 00515152397 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/09/2019
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JORDAN MATTHEW CAPPS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3542 & 19

- 3543

[ July 15, 2021 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Michael Heisey , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 472019CF000486A and 472019CF000129A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Niles Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Be ach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

F ORST

, K LINGENSMITH

, and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN DIVISION

Bree McCleskey

vs.

Tolteca Enterprises, Inc.

§

§

§

§

§

NO: AU:20-CV-00166-RP

ORDER

 The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear by

phone for an initial pretrial conference on June 30, 2020 at 09:10 AM . Counsel for Plaintiff shall

be responsible for coordinating the call and providing dial-in information at least 24 hours prior to

the hearing to opposing counsel and to the Courtroom Deputy at julie_golden@txwd.uscourts.gov.

The parties should be prepared to discuss potential trial settings as the Court intends to set a trial

date in this action at the initial pretrial conference.

 If either party would prefer for the conference to be held in person, counsel should 

contact the Courtroom Deputy as soon as possible in order to set a new date.

 SIGNED on 9th day of June, 2020.

______________________________

ROBERT PITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00166-RP Document 9 Filed 06/09/20 Page 1 of 1
#### GAU v. STATE.

No. 25026.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1951.

*127None on appeal for appellant.

'George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. A jury having been waived, the court found appellant guilty and assessed a fine of fifty dollars.

There is neither a bill of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. All proceedings appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
----

Appointment of the Registrar

(2006/C 34/07)

The term of office of Mr Roger Grass, Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, expired on 9 February 2006.

The Court of Justice, at its General Meeting on 28 June 2005, decided to renew the term of office of Mr Roger Grass in accordance with Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure for the period from 10 February 2006 to 9 February 2012 inclusive.

----