alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 10 January 2006

in Case C-230/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht Mehmet Sedef v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (1)

(EEC-Turkey Association - Freedom of movement for workers - Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Right to the extension of a residence permit - Conditions - Turkish national who was employed in the maritime shipping industry of a Member State for 15 years - Same employer for more than one year without interruption, but not up to the end of a period of three years - Periods of employment interrupted 17 times on account of the nature of the occupation)

(2006/C 60/02)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-230/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany), made by decision of 18 March 2003, received at the Court on 26 May 2003, in the proceedings between Mehmet Sedef and Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, in the presence of Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht — the Court (Second Chamber) composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulman, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 January 2006, in which it ruled:

Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council created by the agreement establishing an association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, is to be interpreted as meaning that:

----

(1)OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

----
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 58     | 86     | 19     | 17     | 120    | 80     | 205    | 30     | 40     | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 118    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00371- CR

Jim Jack Thompson, III, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 26TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 13- 0520 -K 26, H ONO RAB LE B ILLY RAY STUB B LEF IELD, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

The State’s b r ie f w a s orig inally due May 15, 2015. On counsel’s motion, the deadline for filing was extended to J uly 14. State’s counsel has now filed a second moti on reque s t i n g t hat the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief an additional 62 day s. We g rant the motion for extension of time and ord er S t at e’ s counsel to file a brief no later than September 14, 2015. No further extensions of time will be g rante d, and failure to comply with this order will result in the case being submitt ed to this Court on the appellant’s brie f alone
.

I t is ordere d J uly

22 , 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Do Not Publish
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Gerald J. Burnett       |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

I, Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ ROBERT J.  HABIG    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Robert J. Habig         |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

----
TO: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078: EPA Action on Revision to South Coast Portion 

of the California State Implementation Plan; CPV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 

Tracking System

FROM: Ann Lyons, Laura Yannayon

DATE: October 30, 2012

RE: Telephone Conference with South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Representatives

Participants: 

Barbara Baird, Lauren Nevitt: South Coast Air Quality Management District

Laura Yannayon, Ann Lyons: EPA Region 9

EPA requested the telephone conference. The purpose of the telephone conference was for EPA 

to ask the South Coast Air Quality Management District for additional information regarding 

some of the offset transactions in the AB 1318 Tracking System. EPA also asked the District 

representatives questions about information in its AQMPs.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4919 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Para-methoxyphenol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Para-methoxyphenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARA-METHOXYPHENOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Para-methoxyphenol or hydroquinone 

monomethylether (CAS 

No. 150–76–5) (provided 

for in subheading 

2909.50.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4919 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Phyllis Ziccardi, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 28, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board was presented with conflicting evidence as to the reasons for claimant’s separation from her employment, the resolution of which was for the Board to determine *(see, Matter of Jensen [Levine],*49 AD2d 794). Here, the conclusion that claimant left her employment without good cause because she resigned to locate to another State without medical advice to do so is supported by substantial evidence and, accordingly, must be upheld *(see, supra).*

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                          J.P. MORGAN CHASE CAPITAL XII


      THIS Certificate of Trust of J.P. Morgan Chase Capital XII (the "Trust"),
dated as of August 24, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del.C. Section 3801, et seq.).

      1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is J.P. Morgan Chase
Capital XII.

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are The Bank
of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.


                                     THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE)
                                         as Delaware Trustee


                                     By:   /s/ William T. Lewis
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                         Name:  William T. Lewis
                                         Title:  SVP


                                     DINA DUBLON, as Administrative Trustee


                                       /s/ Dina Dublon
                                     -------------------------------------------



                                     JOHN C. WILMOT, as Administrative Trustee


                                       /s/ John C. Wilmot
                                     -------------------------------------------
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1362

___________ Theodore Miller, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Bill Hedrick; James K. Wolfson; * Bill Lewis; M. Cantrell; Mahmood * [UNPUBLISHED] Choudhury; Zafahon, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 29, 2005 Filed: August 17, 2005

___________ Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Theodore Miller appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint against various prison officials. We grant Miller leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The judgment was not a final, appealable order, because it did not address all named defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (creating appellate jurisdiction over final decisions of district courts); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (“order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and-2- liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties”). Whereas the district court’s order mentioned Bill Hedrick and Robert McFadden only, the caption of Miller’s amended complaint indicated his intent to sue additional defendants, and the body of the complaint sufficiently identified these individuals. They included four defendants whom Miller named in his original complaint and the district court continued to list as defendants on its docket. Cf. Rice v. Hamilton Air Force Base Commissary , 720 F.2d 1082, 1085 (9th Cir. 1983) (“[A] party may be properly in a case if the allegations in the body of the complaint make it plain that the party is intended as a defendant.”). Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Thomas v. Basham , 931 F.2d 521, 522-24 (8th Cir. 1991) (appellate courts have obligation to raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte “when there is an indication that jurisdiction is lacking”; appeal was “clearly premature” where some claims were still pending).

______________________________
#### John M. ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27101.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of unlawfully selling ' intoxicating' liquor in a wet area, without' having obtained a license from the Texas Liquor Control *100Board to sell such liquor, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

There appears in this record neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond. In the absence of a sufficient appeal bond or recognizance or a showing that appellant is in jail, this court is without jurisdiction of a misdemeanor appeal. White v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 315, 221 S.W. 283; Skinner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 167; Braun v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 257 S.W.2d 708.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4972 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 

of drugs intended for human use to contain a parenthetical statement 

identifying the source of any ingredient constituting or derived from 

a grain or starch-containing ingredient. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2012 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require the label of drugs intended for human use to 

contain a parenthetical statement identifying the source 

of any ingredient constituting or derived from a grain 

or starch-containing ingredient. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gluten in Medicine 

5 Identification Act of 2012’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4972 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING OF SOURCE OF HUMAN DRUG INGREDI2 ENTS CONSTITUTING OR DERIVED FROM A 

3 GRAIN OR STARCH-CONTAINING INGRE4 DIENT. 

5 (a) MISBRANDING.—Section 502 of the Federal 

6 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(aa) If it is a drug— 

9 ‘‘(1) that is intended for human use; 

10 ‘‘(2) that contains an ingredient (other than a 

11 polyol) that constitutes or is derived from a grain or 

12 starch-containing ingredient; and 

13 ‘‘(3) whose label fails to include a parenthetical 

14 statement identifying the source of the ingredient so 

15 constituted or derived.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 502(aa) of the Federal 

17 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection 

18 (a) of this section, shall apply beginning on the sooner 

19 of— 

20 (1) a date to be determined by the Secretary of 

21 Health and Human Services; and 

22 (2) the date that is 2 years after the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4758 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4758

     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Normal Paraffin M.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Normal Paraffin M.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORMAL PARAFFIN M.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Normal Paraffin M   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (Alkanes C10-C14)                                                 12/31/2015
                          (CAS No. 93924-07-
                          3) (ASTM D-156)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2710.19.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Kansas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Kansas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 1      | 0      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7087
DONALD RICHARD KRAWETZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-953) Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Richard Krawetz, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Richard Krawetz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F. 3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Krawetz has not satisfied either standard. SeeKrawetz v. Angelone , No. CA-01-953 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED