alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

United Kingdom Government notice concerning European Parliament and Council Directive 94/22/EC of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2006/C 63/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNITED KINGDOM 24th OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LICENSING ROUND

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY

The Petroleum Act 1998

Offshore Licensing Round

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry invites interested persons to apply for Seaward Production Licences in respect of certain acreage on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf.

This invitation is in respect of those blocks and parts of blocks that are not subject to an existing petroleum production licence on the date of this Notice in the areas shown on maps deposited at the Department of Trade and Industry, where they can be viewed by prior appointment (tel: (44) (0) 20 7215 5032) between 0915 and 1645, Monday to Friday during the period of this notice.

Full details of the offer, including lists and maps of the acreage on offer and guidance about licences, the terms which those licences will include, and how to apply, are available on the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website (see below).

All applications will be judged in accordance with the terms of the Hydrocarbons Licensing Directive Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995 No. 1434) and against a background of the continuing need for expeditious, thorough, efficient and safe exploration to identify the United Kingdom's oil and gas resources with due regard to environmental considerations. The criteria are available in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 56, 4.3.2004, p. 3) paragraphs 9 to 14 inclusive. Further guidance detailing the above which accompany this offer can be viewed on the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

Licences

Where the Secretary of State offers a licence pursuant to this invitation, the offer will be made within twelve months of the date of this Notice.

The Secretary of State accepts no liability for any costs incurred by the applicant in considering or making its application.

Strategic Environmental Assessment

DTI has conducted a Strategic Environmental Assessment of all of the area to be offered to the standard required in Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment. The finding of the assessment can be found at the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

Licence Administration: Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU), Department of Trade and Industry, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET, United Kingdom (tel: (44) (0) 20 7215 5032, fax: (44) (0) 20 7215 5070).

Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dewitt P. Gibson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the second degree, defendant contends that his plea of guilty was coerced by the threat of a heavier *922sentence if he proceeded to trial. We disagree. The prosecutor, rather than the court, referred to the possibility of a charge of rape in the first degree and, at most, defendant was faced with a potential trial on a more serious charge *(cf., People v Beverly,*139 AD2d 971; *People v Christian,*139 AD2d 896, *lv denied*71 NY2d 1024).

We have examined defendant’s remaining issues on appeal and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
      XiaoLin Liu, Chief  Financial  Officer of  Greater
      China Media and Entertainment Corp.,


certify  pursuant  to
      18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as enacted by
      Section  906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended


September
      30, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies
      fully


complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities


Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(2)
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
      all


material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Greater China
      Media and Entertainment Corp.







Greater
                China Media and Entertainment Corp.Date
                  January 15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ XiaoLin
                LiuName XiaoLin
                Liu,Title Chief
                Financial Officer


A
      signed  original of this
      written  statement  required by Section 906, or
      other


document
      authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that


appears
      in typed form within the  electronic  version of this
      written  statement


required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Greater China Media and Entertainment
      Corp.
      and


will
      be  retained  Greater China Media and Entertainment
      Corp.  and  furnished  to the


Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principals;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most recent fiscal
year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Siouxland
Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: January 13, 2009
    
    /s/ Charles Hofland

Charles Hofland, President and ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4775 

To extend the suspension of duty on Propargite. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Propargite. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPARGITE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.09 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Propargite) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT B-1

Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 169-3 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

ECOFACTOR, INC.

Plaintiff,

 v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 6:20-cv-00075-ADA

EXHIBIT B-1: PLAINTIFF ECOFACTOR’S WITNESS LIST1

Pursuant to the Judge Albright’s Standing Order on Pre-Trial Procedures and Requirements 

in Civil Cases, Plaintiff EcoFactor, Inc. submits the following witness list as Exhibit B-1 to the 

parties Joint Pretrial Order:

No. Witness Name

Estimated Time for 

Examination

1 Shayan Habib 0.8 hours

2 Glen Okita 0.5 hours

3 Erik de la Iglesia 1.5 hours

4 David Kennedy 1 hour

5 John Palmer*2 1 hour

The parties reserve the right to designate any witnesses from the other party’s witness list. 

Additionally, the parties reserve the right to skip the testimony of any witness to the extent such 

1 These disclosures are preliminary in nature and are based on the information currently available 

to EcoFactor. EcoFactor reserves it right to amend and/or supplement these disclosures, 

including in response to disclosures made by Google and/or rulings by the Court.

2 An asterisk indicates that the party may call the corresponding witness if the need arises.

Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 169-3 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 4
2

witness’s testimony is unnecessary due to stipulations of fact, agreement of the parties, or Court 

order.

Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 169-3 Filed 01/07/22 Page 3 of 4
1 

DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC'S OBJECTIONS TO ECOFACTOR, INC.'S WITNESS 

LIST

Defendant Google, LLC (“Google”) hereby submits the following objections to Plaintiff 

EcoFactor, Inc.’s trial witness list pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3)(A). 

Google reserves the right to modify, amend or supplement these objections throughout 

the balance of this case. Google also reserves the right to supplement or modify these objections 

in response to rulings by the Court (including on any motions). 

In addition to the objections below, Google objects to EcoFactor’s assertion that it may 

designate individuals on Google’s witness list for use in its case-in-chief. As the plaintiff, 

EcoFactor must present its case first; it cannot withhold from Google those witnesses it plans to 

call for its case-in-chief. 

Witness Name Estimated 

Time for 

Examination 

Google’s Objections 

Shayan Habib 0.8 hours 

Glen Okita 0.5 hours 

Erik de la Iglesia 1.5 hours 

David Kennedy 1 hour FRE 702. Google’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony 

of David Kennedy. (Dkt. No. 114). 

John Palmer 1 hour FRE 702. Google, ecobee, Inc. and Vivint, Inc’s Motion to 

Exclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Palmer. (Dkt. No. 114). 

Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 169-3 Filed 01/07/22 Page 4 of 4
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 23 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk July 23 , 2021

16 32 75 ( 35 ) ( 36 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 16 32 75

v COA: 35 7514

Washtenaw CC: 18

- 000596

- FC

JACOB LANGSTON

- PORTER LABELLE

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the American Civil Liberties Union of

Michigan et al. to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED . The amicus brief submitted on

July 1 9 , 2021, is accepted for filing

. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion for

the temporary admission of out

- of

- state attorney Roderick M. Hills, Jr., to appear and

practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) i s GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

FRED HAMMOND, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:92-cr-00172-JAB-1) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Fred Hammond, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Fred Hammond, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). In criminal cases, the defendant 

must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry 

of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. 

Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 

proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period 

applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable 

neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension 

of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 

1985). 

 The district court entered its order denying the 

motion for reduction of sentence on April 3, 2008. The notice 

of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on June 16, 2009. 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because Hammond 

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
|                                                                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                              
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                                              
|Texas - RRC District 2 Onshore Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 538    | 511    | 341    | 325   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 478    | 362    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4773 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bifenazate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bifenazate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIFENAZATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.61 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bifenazate) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 343    | 290    | 199    | 554    | 823    | 1,267  | 268    | 315    | 478    | 578   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,701  | 94     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023