alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4786 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4786

             To extend the suspension of duty on Butralin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

Mr. Ross of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To extend the suspension of duty on Butralin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUTRALIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Butralin) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4675 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4675

         To reduce temporarily the duty on 1H-[1,2,4]Triazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce temporarily the duty on 1H-[1,2,4]Triazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1H-[1,2,4]TRIAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1H-[1,2,4]Triazole  2.3%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (provided for in                                                  12/31/2015
                          subheading
                          2933.99.97)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
30           **Exhibit 31.2**           **CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Richard L. Langley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sparton Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2007 /s/ RICHARD L. LANGLEY   Richard L. Langley, Chief Financial Officer
(November 26, 1990)

#### Alexander Hamilton Sales Corporation, Respondent, v Anes, Friedman, Leventhal & Rubin, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appeal by the defendant Anes, Friedman, Leventhal & Rubin, a law partnership, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated December 6, 1988, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated February 6, 1989, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination *(see,*CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 6, 1988, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated February 6, 1989, made upon renewal; and it is further,

*494Ordered that the order dated February 6, 1989, is reversed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, the order dated December 6,1988, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing and new determination in accordance herewith.

CPLR 310 provides that "Personal service upon persons conducting a business as a partnership may be made by personally serving the summons within the state upon any one of them”. Because questions of fact have been raised as to whether or not a specific partner was served in the instant action, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing on this issue *(see, Hickey v Naruth Realty Corp.,*71 AD2d 668; *see also,*Siegel, NY Prac § 251). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIS CARLOS RAMOS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00291

- CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01868)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Alabama (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                        
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Virginia Shale Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 276

_____________________________ S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellant,

v.

M ATTHEW J OSEPH K ENWORTHY , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson
, III, Judge

. April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Andy Thomas, P ublic Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and income statements for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                          31,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,560,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,031,347
<PP&E>                                       6,201,545
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,371,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,927,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,824,844
<BONDS>                                      2,988,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,889
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,036,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,927,924
<SALES>                                      9,510,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,510,818
<CGS>                                        6,973,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,973,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                241,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            124,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   124,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
#### SERVICE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. Burl KING and Wilburn King, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 23, 1951.

Ben D. Smith, V. O. Blackburn, Somerset, for appellant.

Leonard S. Stephens, Whitley City, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment for plaintiff in action to recover collision benefits under policy of insurance.

The motion for an appeal is denied and the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 452 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 452

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

    Mr. Roe of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Posey, Mrs. 
  Blackburn, Mr. Paul, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Jones, Mr. 
Long, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, 
Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Nunnelee, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. 
  Hunter, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Hall, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Coffman of 
Colorado, Mr. Coble, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Rohrabacher) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Rules and Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Decisions Accountability 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4619 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4619

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used gear boxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain used gear boxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN USED GEAR BOXES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain used gear boxes) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1826

___________

Terry B. and John B., Minors, by *

and through their natural parent, *

Naomi Taylor, *

 Plaintiffs- *

Appellees, *

v. *

Arkansas Department of Human *

Services; Tom Dalton, in his *

Individual and Official Capacity *

as Director; Beverly Jones, in * Appeal from the United States

her Individual and Official * District Court for the

Capacity, * Eastern District of Arkansas

 Defendants, *

P.H. Gilkey, in his Individual *

and Official Capacity; Cynthia *

Mahomes, in her Individual and *

Official Capacity, *

 Defendants- *

Appellants, *

Michael Smith, in his Individual *

Capacity; Joyce Smith, in her *

Individual Capacity, *

 Defendants.

*

*

*

*

* (UNPUBLISHED)

*

*
The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Arkansas.

-2-

___________

Submitted: November 19, 1997

Filed: December 5, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This § 1983 action was brought on behalf of Terry B. and John B.

against the Arkansas Department of Human Services and a number of

individuals, including P.H. Gilkey and Cynthia Mahomes. The district

court denied the motion of Gilkey and Mahomes for summary judgment on

1

their qualified immunity defense, finding there remained material issues

of fact. Gilkey and Mahomes appeal this ruling, as well as the district

court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on the merits. Based

on our review of the record we conclude that the district court should be

affirmed on its qualified immunity ruling and that the attempted appeal of

its ruling on the merits should be dismissed. See Johnson v. Jones, 515

U.S. 304, 313 (1995). So ordered.

A true copy.

Attest: 

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.