alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4733 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4733

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-
                        trimethyl diphenylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Huizenga of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-
                        trimethyl diphenylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4'-METHOXY-2,2',4-TRIMETHYL DIPHENYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.35 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-trimethyl 
diphenylamine) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4770 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Yttrium oxides having a purity of at 

least 99.9 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. NEAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Yttrium oxides having 

a purity of at least 99.9 percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YTTRIUM OXIDES HAVING A PURITY OF AT 

4 LEAST 99.9 PERCENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.21 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Yttrium oxides having a purity of at least 99.9 percent) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘2%’’ in 

10 the general rate of duty column; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4770 IH

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4924 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4924

          To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium oxides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Hanna introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium oxides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERMANIUM OXIDES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Germanium oxides    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 1310-53-                                                 12/31/2015
                          8 or 215-180-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2825.60.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4859 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4859

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethylene, 
                    oxidized, polymerized, reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethylene, 
                    oxidized, polymerized, reduced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,1,2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED, REDUCED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        1,1,2-2-            Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Tetrafluoroethyle                                                 12/31/2015
                          ne, oxidized,
                          polymerized,
                          reduced (CAS No.
                          69991-62-4)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3402.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18


                                 Amendment No. 1
                                     to the
                     Performance Stock Option Plan Agreement
                             Dated November 19, 1999


1.    Effective as of December 13, 2000, the first two columns of the
      performance targets set forth in Section 2(a) of the Performance Stock
      Option Plan Agreement are amended as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             Fiscal Year             EBITDA
             -----------             ------
<S>                                  <C>
             2000                    at least $18,915,000
             2001                    at least $22,685,000
             2002                    at least $39,865,000
             2003                    at least $45,856,000
</TABLE>

2.    Effective as of December 13, 2000, Section 2.2 of the Performance Stock
      Option Plan Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "2.2. Change of Control Acceleration. Notwithstanding the
            foregoing, in the event a Change of Control occurs prior to December
            31, 2003, in which the net proceeds actually received by HWH Capital
            Partners, L.P. and its affiliates (collectively, "HWP") in the form
            of cash and marketable securities exceeds, on an aggregate basis
            (after taking into account any prior sales by HWP of any portion of
            its investment in the Company), $491.92 per share of Common Stock,
            the portion of the option which was eligible to become vested
            pursuant to Section 2(a) with respect to the Fiscal year in which a
            Change of Control occurs, and, if any, later Fiscal Years shall
            become exercisable effective immediately prior to such event."


                                    AMN HOLDINGS, INC.

                                    /s/ Steven C. Francis
                                    -----------------------------
                                    By:  Steven C. Francis


                                    OPTIONEE

                                    /s/ Susan R. Nowakowski
                                    -----------------------------
                                    By:  Susan R. Nowakowski
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4959 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Cassia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Oleo Cassia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OLEO CASSIA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Oleo Cassia (CAS No. 

84961–46–6) (provided for 

in subheading 3301.90.10) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4959 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Louisiana--South Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 6      | 6      | 3      | 6      | 6      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
INTERACTIVE PLAY DEVICES LLC

vs.

SPIN MASTER LTD., SPIN MASTER LTD.,

INTERACTIVE PLAY DEVICES LLC

§

§

§

§

§

NO: WA:20-CV-00066-ADA

 ORDER SETTING MARKMAN HEARING

The Court hereby sets and directs the parties, or counsel acting on their behalf, to appear via 

Zoom for a Claim Construction hearing on May 28, 2021 at 1:30 PM . 

SIGNED on 7th day of April, 2021.

______________________________

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

Case 6:20-cv-00066-ADA Document 112 Filed 04/07/21 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Washington, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Shapiro, J.), rendered August 7, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of from 1 Vi to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Police officers, patrolling the vicinity of Fteley Avenue and Bruckner Boulevard in the Bronx at approximately 5:45 p.m. on August 11, 1988, observed defendant sitting in the passenger seat of a black 1985 Oldsmobile, leaning towards the driver side. As the officers approached, defendant sat upright and a slaphammer fell from the car. The officers noted that a bag containing screwdrivers and other tools lay between defendant’s feet. The Oldsmobile’s hood was hot despite the fact *248the car had been parked beneath the shade of a tree. Missing from inside the vehicle were the car radio, the wing nut on the steering column and a wheel cover. Petitioner admitted that the car was not his, explaining that he thought the car was abandoned.

The Oldsmobile owner, who reported the car stolen at approximately 3:00 p.m. the same day, testified the car was operable, in "perfect condition”, and locked prior to the theft. The People’s expert automobile appraiser stated the "Red” book value of the car to be $8,400, less approximately $1,200 in damages.

Contrary to defendant’s argument, we find the evidence in the record, when viewed in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), sufficiently established that defendant knowingly possessed a stolen automobile valued in excess of $100 *(see,*Penal Law § 165.45 [5]). Testimony as to the recent condition of the car, combined with the expert testimony, was adequate to establish the value of the stolen property. Common experience would lead a reasonable man to conclude that defendant, who was found in possession of tools associated with car theft, and was sitting alone in the car whose hood was hot and whose dashboard and steering column had been tampered with, was aware that the property was stolen, and had exercised dominion and control over the Oldsmobile *(see, e.g., People v Hadley,*67 AD2d 259). Defendant’s argument that the car was inoperable is in direct contrast to the owner’s testimony that the car was in perfect running condition just three hours prior to defendant’s apprehension, and as such, merely raised an issue to be resolved by the trier of fact. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
|                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                      
|Texas - RRC District 6 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                      
|Texas - RRC District 6 Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 86     | 600    | 3,939  | 3,134 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,393  | 1,579  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### HANCOCK v. HANCOCK.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 26, 1951.

Anderson & Anderson, John ®. Anderson and E. B. Anderson, all of Owensboro, for appellant.

Appellee not represented by counsel.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Beth and Herman Hancock were married in 1918. Nine children were bom to the couple. They ceased to live together after 1947, though there had been separations on previous occasions. Mrs. Hancock filed an action for a divorce. She sought $35.00 a week for maintenance and support for her four children, ranging in age from 19 to 5 years, and $5000.00 as alimony for herself. Herman Hancock did not contest the action, nor has a brief been filed for him in this Court. The chancellor granted Mrs. Hancock a divorce, denied her alimony, but allowed her $25.00 per week for maintenance and support of herself and her four infant children. On this appeal she contends that, since the divorce was granted to her, she should have been allowed alimony, payable in installments, and the sum of $35.00 per week for maintenance and support of the four infant children.

During the last few years Hancock has made good wages working at carpentering and other trades. His income was approximately $3600.00 for the period between December 1948 and February 1950.

We think Mrs. Hancock was entitled to alimony. Therefore, we direct that an award of $3000.00, payable in monthly installments of $50.00, be made to her. While the $25.00 per week for the children is low enough, we are not disposed to change that figure.

The part of the judgment allowing maintenance for the children is affirmed, and the part denying Mrs. Hancock alimony is reversed, with directions for the entry of a judgment in conformity with this opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4632 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4632

          To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Chlorotoluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Altmire introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Chlorotoluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-CHLOROTOLUENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Chlorotoluene) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4561 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4561

  To reduce temporarily the duty on 5-Methylpyridine-2,3-dicarboxylic 
                                 acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on 5-Methylpyridine-2,3-dicarboxylic 
                                 acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-METHYLPYRIDINE-2,3-DICARBOXYLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Methylpyridine-2,3-
dicarboxylic acid) is amended--
            (1) in the general rate of duty column, by striking 
        ``Free'' and inserting ``1.3%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```