alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7,183 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9,346  | 5,367  | 2,683  | 656    | 1,832  | 910    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1795

_____________________________
M ICHAEL K. R ILEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County

. John H. Skinner , Judge

. March 25, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. Hall v. State , 94 So. 3d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

R OWE , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael K. Riley, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Opinion issued June 18 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00134
- CR NO. 01
- 13
- 00135
- CR

——————————— JOSE LUIS GARCIA III, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1318638 and 1366267

MEMORANDUM OPINION In trial court cause number 1318638 , appellant, Jose Luis Garcia III, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance , namely, methamphetamine, weighing more than 1 gram and less than 4 grams , and pleaded2

true to a felony enhancement . In trial court cause number 1366267 , appellant pleaded guilty to the felony offense of unlawful possession of a firearm, and pleaded true to a felony enhancement. In each cause number, the trial court found appellant guilty , found the enhancement true, and, in accordance with appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellan t to confinement for three years, with the sentences to run concurrently. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal in each cause. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. The trial court must enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). In a plea

- bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. I d. I f a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record , we must dismiss the appeal

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s record filed in each appeal reflects that th e trial court certified that the case is a plea

- bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record in each case supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 1 54 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Further, in each case, the record does not reflect that the trial court ruled adversely to appellant on any matters raised by written motion filed and ruled on3

before trial , and appellant did not get the trial co urt’s permission to appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2); Barcenas v. State , 137 S.W.3d 865, 866 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). Because appellant does not have a right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction

. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without fur ther action .” ). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeals, which is not signed by counsel, is dismissed
as moot. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a ). Any other pending motions are dismissed as
moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 476 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 476

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2011

   Mr. Brady of Texas (for himself, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
  Texas, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. 
McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Sessions, Mrs. Adams, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
Poe of Texas, Mr. Young of Florida, Ms. Granger, Mr. Heller, Ms. Brown 
of Florida, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Duncan 
   of Tennessee, Mr. McDermott, Ms. Herrera Beutler, and Mr. McCaul) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

    Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``, and before January 1, 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

EL PASO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PATRICK WOOD CRUSIUS, 

Defendant. 

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

CAUSE NO.: EP-20-CR-00389-DCG 

NOTICE 

 The United States of America hereby notifies the Court and Defendant PATRICK WOOD 

CRUSIUS that the Government will not seek the death penalty in the instant case. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MARGARET LEACHMAN 

FIRST ASSISTANT UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY 

/s/ Ian Martinez Hanna .

IAN MARTINEZ HANNA

Assistant United States Attorney 

Texas Bar # 24057885 

700 East San Antonio, Suite 200 

El Paso, Texas 79901 

/s/ Gregory McDonald .

GREGORY MCDONALD 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Texas Bar # 13547300 

700 East San Antonio, Suite 200 

El Paso, Texas 79901 

/s/ Michael S. Warbel .

MICHAEL S. WARBEL 

Trial Attorney 

DOJ Criminal Division 

950 Constitution Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20530 

Ohio Bar # 0074369 

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 254 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2

KRISTEN M. CLARKE 

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION 

/s/ Kyle Boynton .

KYLE BOYNTON 

Trial Attorney 

Criminal Section 

Civil Rights Division 

950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20530 

202-598-0449 

Kyle.boynton@usdoj.gov 

Virginia Bar # 92123 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 17th day of January 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing instrument was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF 

System, which will transmit notification of such filing to the following CM/ECF participants: 

Joe A. Spencer 

Rebecca L. Hudsmith 

Mark Stevens 

Felix Valenzuela 

Attorneys for Defendant 

/s/ Ian Martinez Hanna .

IAN MARTINEZ HANNA 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Case 3:20-cr-00389-DCG Document 254 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-033;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
**Exhibit 10.22****Executive Bonus Plan**Each named executive officer is eligible for an annual bonus equal to 70%-100% of his base salaryassuming the plan payments are made at target. Bonus payments are based on our overall achievementof our financial plan and individual contributions. The financial plan component, which represents70% of the bonus opportunity, is determined by assessing our achievement of specified AdjustedEBITDA (defined as Consolidated EBITDA in our senior secured credit facility) and revenuethresholds. The targets of the bonus plan can be adjusted by a range of performance within aminimum to maximum threshold varying bonus payments between 25% and 250% percent of target. To beeligible for a bonus payment, the executive officer must demonstrate satisfactory performance,contribution and effort consistent with his peer group. Bonus payments are typically made in thefirst quarter of each calendar year reflecting accomplishments of the prior calendar year. Bonuspayments will not be made if the minimum Adjusted EBITDA threshold is not met.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 16, 2017

s0315 

# Order

Clerk March 16, 2017

155156 & (13)

CRAIG HECHT,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155156

COA: 335763

Genesee CC: 10

- 093161

- CL

NATIONAL HERITAGE ACADEMIES, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REVERSE the November 3, 2016 order of the Genesee Circuit Court, and we REMAND

this case to that court for entry of an order granting the defendant’s motion to define the

scope of the trial on remand. In Hecht v National Heritage Academies, Inc , 499 Mich

586, 628 (2016), this Court vacated only the jury award of future econom ic damages; the

special jury verdict finding that the plaintiff would not suffer future emotional

- distress

damages as a result of his termination was not vacated.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4763 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. NEAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on N-phenylp-phenylenediamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. N-PHENYL-P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.81 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4763 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58109-58110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-117]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aero-Space Technology Advisory 
Committee (ASTAC); Airframe Systems Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 58110]]

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Aero-Space Technology Advisory Committee, Airframe Systems 
Subcommittee.

DATES: Tuesday, October 24, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, 
October 25, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Thursday, October 26, 
2000, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 Noon.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley 
Research Center, Building 1219, Room 225, Hampton, VA 23681-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darrel R. Tenney, National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, 
757/864-6033.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Aerospace Vehicle Systems Technology Program (AVSTP) Overview--
Strategic Direction and New Initiatives
--AVSTP Technical Reviews
--Research Facility Tours

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: September 22, 2000.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-24760 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

ΚΟΙΝΌΣ ΚΑΤΆΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΠΟΙΚΙΛΙΏΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΙΔΏΝ ΤΩΝ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΚΏΝ ΦΥΤΏΝ

πρώτο συμπλήρωμα στην εικοστή τρίτη πλήρη έκδοση

(2006/C 80 A/01)

ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ

Θέμα

Κατάλογος των ειδών των γεωργηκών φυτών

I.   Τεύτλα

II.   Κτηνοτροφικά φυτά

III.   Ελαιούχα και ινώδη φυτά

IV.   Σιτηρά

V.   Γεώμηλα

----

ΘΕΜΑ

----

(1)ΕΕ C 68 A της 21.3.2006, σ. 1.

(2)ΕΕ L 193 της 20.7.2002, σ. 1· οδηγία όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1829/2003 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου (ΕΕ L 268 της 18.10.2003, σ. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

Διορθωτικά

----

Διορθωτικό στον κοινό κατάλογο των ποικιλιών των ειδών των γεωργικών φυτών — Εικοστή τέταρτη πλήρης έκδοση

(Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 68 Α της 21ης Μαρτίου 2006)

(2006/C 80 Α/02)

Σελίδα 7, σημείο 2:

αντί:

«από τις 17 Σεπτεμβρίου 2004»,

διάβαζε:

«από τις 28 Φεβρουαρίου 2006».

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6940

HOBART MATTHEW PARKER, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00542-RGD-JEB)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hobart Matthew Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Joanne Virginia Frye, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Hobart Matthew Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO DIVISION

BRANDON CALLIER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

SUNPATH LTD; NORTHCOAST 

WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.; 

NATIONAL CARE CURE, LLC; and 

JOHN/JANE DOES 1–4.

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

EP-20-CV-23-KC 

ORDER

On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff’s Notice of Non-Suit, ECF No. 5. In 

accordance with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of Plaintiff’s 

Notice, it is hereby ORDERED that all claims in this case are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

The clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 16th day of February, 2020.

KATHLEEN CARDONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-00023-KC Document 6 Filed 02/16/20 Page 1 of 1
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.4

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                             CUMMINS CAPITAL TRUST I

         THIS Certificate of Trust of Cummins Capital Trust I (the "Trust"),
dated May 3, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by The Bank of New York
(Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, an
Illinois banking corporation, as trustees, to form a business trust under the
Delaware Business Trust Act (12 DEL. C. ss.3801 ET SEQ.).

         1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Cummins
Capital Trust I.

         2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is The Bank of New York (Delaware), Route
273, White Clay Center, Newark, Delaware 19711, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration.

         3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.


                                     THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE)


                                     By:  /s/ WILLIAM T. LEWIS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                     Name:  WILLIAM T. LEWIS
                                     Title:  SVP


                                     BNY MIDWEST TRUST COMPANY


                                     By:  /s/ C. POTTER
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                     Name:  C. POTTER
                                     Title: Assistant Vice President