alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5,223  | 9,127  | 17,134 | 12,352
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6,292  | 12,866 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4777 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-di-methylethyl)-5- 

methyl-phenol]. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-methyl-phenol]. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4’-THIOBIS[2-(1,1-DI-METHYLETHYL)-5-METH4 YL-PHENOL]. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-methyl-phenol] (CAS No. 96–69–5) 

(provided for in subheading 2930.90.29) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4777 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### WESTERMAN v. STATE.

No. 25354.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 20, 1951.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted and fined $150 for driving on a public highway while intoxicated.

The record before us contains no statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings are in order and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Edsel SLONE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 23, 1954.

Robert S. Wellman, Prestonsburg, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.-

Motion for an appeal from the Lawrence Circuit Court, James W. Turner, Judge.

Edsel Slone was indicted on a charge of assault and battery, a common law misdemeanor. He was convicted and fined $750. Slone has moved for ah appeal -in this court on the ground that an error was committed during his trial because of the involuntary absence -of himself and his counsel during his trial.

■.An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to Slone’s substantial rights on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         460,624
<SECURITIES>                                   8,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,153,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                   14,060
<INVENTORY>                                    201,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,029,718
<PP&E>                                         654,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 418,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,614,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          404,483
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,653,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,614,072
<SALES>                                        2,651,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,800,289
<CGS>                                          347,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  347,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,419,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,032,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,035,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,035,747
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06




</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




I, Simon
B. Moss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications
Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      Simon
      B. MossName:
            Simon
      B. MossDate: May 8,
      2009
            Title:
            Chief
      Executive Officer






I, Elias
A. MurrayMetzger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Avistar Communications Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      Elias
      A. MurrayMetzgerName:
            Elias
      A. MurrayMetzgerDate: May 8,
      2009
            Title:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Arlene Botkin, Appellant, v United Federation of Teachers, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered April 16, *2331989, which dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a former school secretary employed by the New York City Board of Education, was terminated after a hearing in which she was represented by an attorney provided her by defendant collective bargaining representative. This administrative determination was confirmed by the Appellate Division, Second Department. *(Matter of Botkin v Board of Educ.,*122 AD2d 136, *lv denied*70 NY2d 609.) A grievance filed by plaintiff with the Grievance Committee of this court concerning her representation at the hearing was dismissed after investigation.

Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action seeking monetary damages against defendant for breach of its duty of fair representation. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) was properly granted.

Where, as here, the merits of the underlying grievance have been fully litigated resulting in a determination unfavorable to plaintiff, plaintiff is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from bringing an action against the union *(Sinicropi v New York State Pub. Employment Relations Bd.,*125 AD2d 386, *Iv denied*70 NY2d 606). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31

         CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

            Re:   Meritage Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-1
                  Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-1
                  -------------------------------------------

            CERTIFICATION

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Meritage Mortgage
Loan Trust 2005-1 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-1;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Saxon Mortgage
Services, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2006

                                    FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                    By:   /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Name: Robert McGinnis
                                          Title: President
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.14

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                             DISNEY CAPITAL TRUST I



         THIS Certificate of Trust of Disney Capital Trust I (the "Trust"),
dated August 14, 2001, is being duly executed and filed to form a business trust
under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 DEL. C. Section 3801 ET SEQ.)(the
"Act").

         1.       NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Disney
Capital Trust I.

         2.       DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3.       EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust will be effective as
of its filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written
in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.



                               WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                               individual capacity, but solely as trustee


                               By:   /s/ NORMA P. CLOSS
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Name:  Norma P. Closs
                                  Title: Vice President
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, Chief Financial Officer

August 18, 2006
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Ruth Swan, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 29, 2017





By:     /s/  Ruth Swan



Ruth Swan,

Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7111** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DAVID AMEZQUITA

- FRANCO , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cr - 00052

- HEH

- DJN

- 1; 3:16

- cv - 00526

- HEH )

Submitted : January 31 , 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. David Amezquita

- Franco, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David A mezquita

- Franco seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Amezquita

- Franco has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny as moot Amezquita

- Franco ’s motion to expedite, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with ora l argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 6 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Texas - RRC District 6 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 18     | 19     | 19     | 20     | 20     | 16     | 16     | 16     | 15    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 13     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023