alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4628 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4628

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Budget, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interest Rate Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
        ``2012'' and inserting ``2013''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``2012'' and inserting 
        ``2013''.

SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO ACT OF 2010.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements at May 31, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,251
<SECURITIES>                                    71,383
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,410
<PP&E>                                          22,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,437
<OTHER-SE>                                    (312,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,410
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.001)

        



</TABLE>
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Texas (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,052 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,580  | 12,185 | 3,748  | 7,294  | 7,600  | 3,431  | 14,404 | 13,453 | 10,209 | 8,711 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8,747  | 24,769 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Texas--RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 11     | 8      | 2      | 3      | 1      | 5      | 1      | 3      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### In the Matter of Reginald Bruno, Appellant, v County of Monroe et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge respondent Sheriff's failure to return $18,350 seized from petitioner following a search of his person at the Rochester airport. Petitioner contends that the seizure and refusal to return the money were illegal, arbitrary and capricious. In dismissing the petition, the court held that, irrespective of the reasonableness of the seizure, the Sheriff did not act illegally or unreasonably in refusing to return the money because the seizure had been adopted by the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), thus effectively removing the seized funds from the Sheriff’s control, and because the Sheriff had a rational basis for believing that the money was subject to Federal forfeiture as a result of its connection to a drug transaction.

We agree with the court that the legality of the seizure is irrelevant to this case. The validity of a forfeiture is not dependent upon there having been a valid seizure *(United States v Eighty-Eight Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars,*671 F2d 293, 297-298). Thus, the narrow issue before us concerns the legality and reasonableness of the Sheriff’s refusal to return the money to petitioner pending the commencement of a Federal forfeiture proceeding. The applicable Federal legislation and implementing regulations authorize the Sheriff to seize property anticipatory to Federal forfeiture, subject only to the adoption of that seizure by an authorized Federal agent (21 USC § 881 [e] [1] [A]; 21 CFR 1316.71 [c]; 1316.72). Where a DEA agent adopts a local officer’s seizure, constructive custody of the property is vested in a designated "custodian”, here the DEA "Special Agent-in-Charge” (21 CFR 1316.71 [b], [e]; 1316.73), subject only to the orders and decrees of the court or *873official having jurisdiction thereof (21 USC § 881 [c]). Thus, the conclusion is inescapable that, at the time the petition was filed, the money was no longer under the control of the Sheriff but rather in the constructive custody of the DEA. Thus, the Sheriffs refusal to return the money was compelled by law and, a fortiori, reasonable.

This case is to be distinguished from our recent decision in *Coon v New York State Police*(162 AD2d 1018), in which we found that there were factual issues requiring a hearing to determine whether State court or Federal court had in rem jurisdiction. Here, we were presented with only the narrow issue of the reasonableness of the Sheriffs refusal to turn over the property. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rose, J.—art 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24664]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251]


Florida Power and Light Company, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant; 
Notice of Receipt of Application for Renewal of Facility Operating 
License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41 for an Additional Twenty-Year Period

    On September 11, 2000, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
received, by letter dated September 8, 2000, an application from 
Florida Power and Light Company, filed pursuant to section 104(b) of 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 CFR part 54, for 
renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41, which 
authorizes the applicant to operate Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 for an 
additional 20-year period. The current operating licenses for Turkey 
Point Units 3 and 4 expire on July 19, 2012 and April 10, 2013, 
respectively. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 are pressurized-water reactors 
designed by Westinghouse and are located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. 
The acceptability of the tendered application for docketing and other 
matters, including an opportunity to request a hearing, will be the 
subject of a subsequent Federal Register notice.
    A copy of the application is available for public inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 
Rockville, Maryland, and on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov, (the 
Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of September 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christopher I. Grimes,
Chief, License Renewal and Standardization Branch, Division of 
Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-24664 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|California (with State Offshore) Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3      | 1      | 1      | 4      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Segway IV Corp. for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006, I, Donny Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway IV Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Donny Smith*

Donny SmithChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                      |

 
| Dated: | May 10, 2006 |
|--------|--------------|
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,585 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 861    | 502    | 1,533  | 329    | 96     | 30     | 168    | 724    | 68     | 59    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 1,338  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Isidoro Rivera, Respondent, v Benjamin M. Lopez, Doing Business as Satellite Restaurant, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: While working as a doorman at defendant’s bar and grill, plaintiff was injured by the son of defendant’s barmaid. Plaintiff commenced a negligence action against defendant, who thereafter moved for summary judgment, asserting that the exclusive remedy of plaintiff, his employee, was through workers’ compensation. Plaintiff contended that he was not an employee. The court erred in deciding defendant’s motion on the record presented. The court should have held the motion in abeyance and referred the case to the Workers’ Compensation Board to determine whether plaintiff was defendant’s employee *(see, Botwinick v Ogden,*59 NY2d 909; *Rohan v North Main St. Dev. Corp.,*146 AD2d 687). That Board has exclusive jurisdiction over questions of fact and mixed questions of law and fact concerning the applicability of workers’ compensation coverage *(see, Liss v Trans Auto Sys.,*68 NY2d 15, 20-21; *O’Rourke v Long,*41 NY2d 219, 222; *Gyory v Radgowski,*89 AD2d 867, 869), and that proper procedure cannot be circumvented by litigants who select the court system as the forum for litigating their dispute *(see, Cunningham v State of New York,*60 NY2d 248, 252). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—summary judgment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.