alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

NORDIC INTERACTIVE 

TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 6:20-cv-00064

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Nordic Interactive Technologies (“Nordic”) served Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) with its Initial Infringement 

Contentions on July 10, 2020, and Samsung contends leave of court is necessary to amend 

contentions to add an inadvertently forgotten claim chart that Samsung contends was not 

previously provided in Nordic’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions pursuant to the Court’s 

June 30, 2020 Order Governing Proceedings [Dkt. 21]. Nordic has met and conferred with 

Samsung and exchanged correspondence where Samsung has given consent to file this 

unopposed motion for leave to amend said Initial Infringement Contentions (see Exh. 1)

including that Nordic agrees that (i) the asserted claims of US 7,590,097 have an invention date 

no later than October 31, 2002; and (ii) the asserted claims of US 6,345,095 have an invention 

date no later than August 14, 1998 (Id.). Nordic submits this corrected Motion based on further 

conversations with Samsung on August 31, 2020. Regardless of whether leave is required or not, 

Samsung has agreed that it has no objection to Nordic’s motion for leave given said stipulations

and, out of an abundance of caution, Nordic requests leave to serve its first amended contentions, 

Case 6:20-cv-00064-ADA Document 31 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 2
2

which include documents related to claims Samsung contends were not previously provided in 

Nordic’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions served July 10, 2020. Once the Court so orders

and allows, Nordic will timely serve said Amended Initial Infringement Contentions.

 Respectfully submitted, 

PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Texas State Bar No. 00787165

Charles Ainsworth

Texas State Bar No. 00783521

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 418

Tyler, Texas 75702

Tel. (903) 531-3535

charley@pbatyler.com

rcbunt@pbatyler.com

William Cory Spence

Jason Wejnert

SpencePC

515 N. State St., 14th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60654

312-404-8882

william.spence@spencepc.com

jason.wejnert@spencepc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Nordic Interactive 

Technologies LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on September 1, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served to all counsel of record via CM/ECF. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER BUNT

Case 6:20-cv-00064-ADA Document 31 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 2
#### FOWLE v. STATE.

No. 25485.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 31, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is seriously threatening life as denounced by Article 1265, Penal Code; the punishment, four months in jail and a fine of $300.00.

There being no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record, the judgment of' the trial court is affirmed.
#### Hassan Qassemzadeh, Appellant, v IBM Poughkeepsie *379Employees Federal Credit Union, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for money paid out on an allegedly altered share draft, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated January 13, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In 1983, the plaintiff had a share draft account with the defendant credit union. Allegedly, share draft No. 264, dated December 1, 1982, made payable for $9.60, was altered and subsequently cashed for $9,000.60. Thereafter, the defendant debited the plaintiff’s account in the amount of $9,000.60. Although the account statement for January 1983, which was mailed by the defendant to the plaintiff’s niece as directed by the plaintiff, revealed that the draft had been paid on January 6, 1983, in the amount of $9,000.60, the plaintiff failed to notify the defendant of the problem until on or about January 14, 1984.

We conclude that the plaintiff waived his right to bring this action by failing to notify the defendant of the alleged altered draft within 30 days after his account statement was mailed to him, as required by the share draft agreement. Moreover, the defendant’s check processing procedure was consistent with that followed by all credit unions, and was not contrary to UCC article 4. Thus, it "prima facie constitutes the exercise of ordinary care” (UCC 4-103 [3]; see, *J. Sussman, Inc. v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.,*140 AD2d 668; *cf., SOS Oil Corp. v Norstar Bank,*76 NY2d 561). Therefore, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the defendant. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4568 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxalic acid, diethyl ester (DEO). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxalic acid, diethyl 

ester (DEO). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OXALIC ACID, DIETHYL ESTER (DEO). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Oxalic acid, diethyl ester 

(DEO) (CAS No. 95–92– 

1) (provided for in subheading 2917.11.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4568 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves New Reservoir in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3      | 2      | 3      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 4      | 4      | 5      | 5      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | W      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Abatement Order filed January 5, 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00653

- CV

____________ ANDRE MCCOY , Appellant

V. ROBERT ANDING, M.D., ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the Proba te Court No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 352,923

- 405



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on Dec ember 28
, 20 2 2, that appell ee Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P.A. is in bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on D ecember 22, 2022 , appell ee Obstetrical a nd Gynecological Associates, P.A

. , petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas under case number 2 2

- 33816 . A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcypetiti on is filed until the appellate court reins tates the appeal in accordance with

federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.
When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move the appellate court to reinst ate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is

re quired from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).
For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4925 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4925

         To suspend temporarily the duty on gallium unwrought.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Hanna introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on gallium unwrought.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GALLIUM UNWROUGHT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Gallium unwrought   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 7440-55-                                                 12/31/2015
                          3 or 231-163-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8112.92.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4734 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imazalil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Imazalil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMAZALIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (RS)-1-(β-allyloxy-2,4- 

dichlorophenethyl)imidazole 

(Imazalil) (CAS No. 35554– 

44–0) (provided for in subheading 2933.29.35) ........... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4734 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                                         
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 6 Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 9 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 469   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 191    | 5,864  | 1,111  | 616    | 1,141  | 1,138  | 342    | 206    | 201    | 505   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,523  | 574    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Carmen, III, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing testimony fully supports the suppression court’s finding that defendant consented to the warrantless entry of his apartment by the police. Thus, there was no *Payton*violation *(see, Payton v New York,*445 US 573), and the court properly refused to suppress physical evidence found subsequent to that entry *(see, People v McCrary,*152 AD2d 710; *People v Brown,*144 AD2d 975, *lv denied*73 NY2d 889). The court also did not err in rejecting defendant’s motion to suppress the contents of a zippered black pouch that was opened by police incidental to defendant’s arrest. Defendant previously had identified himself by another name, and when the police asked if defendant had identification, defendant said it was in the pouch and motioned toward the top of his bedroom dresser. At the time, although defendant was handcuffed, he was standing some five feet from the dresser, and the police had already found two shotguns and chuka sticks in plain view in the bedroom. The police secured the pouch for the purpose of confirming defen*914dant’s identification, and examination of the contents of the pouch for safety reasons was not, under the circumstances, unreasonable *(see, People v Smith,*59 NY2d 454, 458). Defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.