alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Midway Gold
Corp. (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of
the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report)
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                                                
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 30, 2010 | /s/ Daniel Wolfus                              
|                      |                                                
|                      | Daniel
 Wolfus                                 
|                      | Chairman,
 Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                      | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                 

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.











81

---
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4560 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbosulfan technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbosulfan technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARBOSULFAN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7- 

benzofuranyl 

methylcarbamate 

(Carbosulfan technical) 

(CAS No. 55285–14–8) 

(provided for in subheading 2932.99.20) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4560 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rivera, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on November 10, 1988, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an *294indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge óf that court and by submitting such application to the clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04428]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 11779-01-R3]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for United States Steel 
Corporation, Mon Valley Works Edgar Thompson Plant

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated February 7, 2024, granting a petition dated September 
26, 2023 from the Environmental Integrity Project, the Clean Air 
Council, and PennFuture. The petition requested that the EPA object to 
a Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Allegheny 
County Health Department (ACHD) to the U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works 
Edgar Thompson Plant (U.S. Steel, Edgar Thompson) for its steel 
production facility located in Braddock, Allegheny County, 
Pennsylvania.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Talley, EPA Region 3, (215) 
814-2117, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a5e4b46464f53044e4b5c434e6a4f5a4b044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a1e0b06060f13440e0b1c030e2a0f1a0b440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>. The final order and petition are 
available electronically at: www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from the 
Environmental Integrity Project, the Clean Air Council, and PennFuture 
dated September 26, 2023, requesting that the EPA object to the 
issuance of operating permit no. 0051-OP23, issued by ACHD to U.S. 
Steel, Edgar Thompson in Braddock, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
    On February 7, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an order granting 
the petition.
    The order itself explains the basis for the EPA's decision.

Cristina Fern[aacute]ndez,
Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024-04428 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WEBSTER v. STATE.

No. 27044.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant;

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of burglary; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be permitted to be filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4746 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4746

         To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-MERCAPTOETHANOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Mercaptoethanol) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2005-5, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2005-5 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2005.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 31, 2006











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2005.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2005, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/05 through 12/31/05 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2005, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
06/03/2013 14:43 FAX 870 741 0021 

P.O. Box 1715 

Harrison, AR 72602 

Qffice: 870-741-2777 

Fax: 870-741-0021 

June 3, 2013 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue SE, 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

Mayors Office 

City of Harrison 

\v'Vv\v.citvofh?!Tison.com 

RE: EAS at Harrison, Arkansas (DOT -OST -1997-2935) 

Dear Mr. DeVany 

[4J 0002/0002 

l:b\ _ o 'bf- \ ot cr1- d<i3..) 

Jef(Crockelf 

1\1ayor 

mavonc_[lcitvofl1a1Tison.com 

.c::."· 

On behalf of the City of Harrison, I appreciate the opportunity to submit comments on the carrier proposals to 

provide Essential Air Service. After reviewing the proposals and discussing with various stakeholders, the City of 

Harrison recommends reselection of SeaPort Airlines as the provider of EAS at Harrison and supports the airline's 

request for a four-year contract. 

Since it launched service to Harrison in 2009, the City and residents have been pleased with the reliable service and 

reasdnable fares provided by SeaPoti Airlines. There is likely no greater indication of this satisfaction than over 

I 0,000 passengers using SeaPoti's service at Boone County Regional Airport during 2012. This is significant 

considering that Harrison was without scheduled air service for the 18 months prior to SeaPort's launch_ This 

required travelers to seek out service at other airports and effectively reduced the traffic base of Boone County 

Airport to, effectively, "zero." To protect and build on the traffic growth to date, continuity of service pattern and in 

the airline providing scheduled service is believed to be in the community's best interest. 

Our recommendation to reselect SeaPort is also based on the airline's track record of providing reliable service, 

reasonable fares, and friendly and personal service_ SeaPort has an on-going and constructive dialogue with the 

airport board, is a member of the Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce, makes donations to civic and charitable 

organizations in the community, and responds fully to each customer comment, complaint, or suggestion. 

The interest of other carriers in the HatTison market and effort they made to prepare their proposals is very much 

appreciated. Nonetheless, the combination of service, fares, participation in the community, improvements to 

systems that will allow connecting flight agreements, and other specifics in their proposal, leads us to conclude that 

SeaPort provides the right balance of community needs, reasonable subsidy requirements, and opportunity to 

maintain the positive traffic trends in Harrison. 

On behalf of the City of Harrison, thank you for your continued support of the EAS program. Please do not hesitate 

to contact me if you need further comments.
Exhibit
99.3




CERTIFICATION
OF ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
 ACTING
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Poly-Pacific International
Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.
  Date:  July
2, 2008
  /s/
“Randy Hayward”
 Randy
Hayward
 President,
 Acting
Chief Executive Officer, and
 Acting
Chief Financial Officer
  This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of DigitalPost Interactive,
      Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                April 11, 2007/s/ Michael
                SawtellMichael
                Sawtell*Chief
                Executive Officer*
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/    Christopher L. NagelChristopher L. NagelVice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer 93
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 115    | 4,291  | 6      | 258    | 1,495  | 5      | 2,105  | 2,931  | 1,009  | 7,031 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 224    | 12,803 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
  Certification
    by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
    Section 1350, as Adopted
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-K
    
        Certification
    by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
    Section 1350, as Adopted
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-K
    By:
    /s/  Seth
    Halio   Title:
    EVP and Chief Financial Officer
# AD Grid Sheet 

# ()DL\0 Do c k e t No .: FAA-20 1 1-**** 

### Dir e ctorate Identifi e r: 20 11 -1\TM -121 - AD 

### AD Action: N o t ice o f propo s ed rul e m a kin g 

### (NP RM) T hi s ac t ion applies to A irbus Mo d e l A300 se ri es airplanes. /**;-~** 

### I f th is draft is acceptab le, please legi b ly sign the grid to th e right w ith your first ini t ial an fu ll last name to show concurrence with this AD. NCURRENCES**ROUTI~G** S YMBO L 

# 4NW1-1 JNITIA 

### I UATE •

A E



## 1/lo/IZR OUTING SY M BOL 

# A- rJ**rfl~** 

## 14 

# I I NI

T I

AL

SIS I

G

INITIALSSIG DATE ROUTI NG S\'MUOL

DAT E ROUT I NG S I ' M IJOL INITIALS. ' StG ATE OUTISG SY\I OOL IN"ITIALS:,IG ATE

## AD Grid Sheet Docket No . : FAA-2011 -   Directorate Jdentifier: 20 11-NM-121-AD AD Action: Notice of proposed rulemalcing (NPRM) This action applies to Airbus Model A300 series airplanes. If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial and** ""~""'m~** .... .,.s,.""' • r.
_ _ _ full last name to show concurrence with this AD.

AlE

R<UJfrSG S\ 'lo i UOl
AU: u nSGsn.wot.

AT