alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SUMMERS v. NIPPER.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 25, 1951.

D. B. Wooton, Hazard, for appellant.

Ren F. Nickell, West Liberty, for ap-pellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

James B. Summers filed this action for a new trial under subsection 7 of Section 518, of the Civil Code of Practice. Summers, who was also the plaintiff in the original action, charged that he suffered unavoidable casualty and misfortune because the clerk failed to notify his attorney when his case would be called for trial. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the petition after a demurrer had been sustained thereto and Summers had declined to plead further.

Complaint is made of the following order: “By agreement of the parties the following cases were ordered set down for trial on the following days of the present term, to-wit: James B. Summers, Vs. Holly Nipper, 8th Day.”

It is contended that the order was erroneously designated as an agreed order, and that it was meaningless as to the date the case was set for trial. There was no charge that the order had been entered fraudulently. The order shows clearly that the case was .set down for the eighth day of the term. That was the date on which the case was tried.

 It was charged also that the clerk had promised to advise Summers or his attorney the date the case was set for trial, and that he failed to do so. As pointed out in the case of Carter v. Miller, 264 Ky. 532, 95 S.W.2d 29, a casualty or mis*75fortune sufficient to authorize the granting of a new trial must be unavoidable. Actually, Summers and his attorney made the clerk their agent, insofar as the notice of the day the case was set for trial was concerned. A similar situation was discussed in the case of Flanary’s Adm’x v. Griffin, Ky., 239 S.W.2d 248.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 4.26


 


(English Translation)


 


Three-Party Debt Service Agreement


 


Party A: Daqo Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Party
A”)


 


Party B: Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
“Party B”)


 


Party C: Xinjiang Daqo Investment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
“Party C”)


 


Date:


 


Whereas, Party A has lent RMB 47,256,274.89 in total to Party
C from the year 2011 to the year 2018, and as of October 31, 2018, upon verification of the statements by the parties, it is concluded
that Party C still owes RMB 47,256,274.89 to Party A.


 


Upon amicable negotiation, Party A, Party B and Party C agree
as follows with respect to the amount of RMB 47,256,274.89 owed by Party C to Party A:


 


1. Party B agrees to repay the debt of RMB 47,256,274.89 to
Party A for Party C;


 


2. The debt of RMB 47,256,274.89 between Party A and Party C
will be discharged;


 


3. Party A owns a claim of RMB 47,256,274.89 against Party B,
and Party B owns a claim of RMB 47,256,274.89 against Party C;


 


4. This Agreement shall take effect upon signature and seal
by Party A, Party B and Party C. If any dispute arises during performance of this Agreement, the three parties shall try to solve
the dispute through amicable negotiation, failing which either Party may submit the dispute to the Shihezi Branch of Karamay Arbitration
Commission for arbitration, and the arbitral award shall be final and conclusive;


 


5. This Agreement is made in triplicate, with each party holding
one copy.


 


Party A: Daqo Group Co., Ltd.


 


(Company seal of Daqo Group Co., Ltd.)


 


Party B: Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.


 


(Company seal of Xinjiang Daqo New Energy
Co., Ltd.)


 


Party C: Xinjiang Daqo Investment Co., Ltd.


 


(Company seal of Xinjiang Daqo Investment
Co., Ltd.)
#### WIDENER v. STATE.

No. 26528.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is possession of whiskey and wine for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, one hundred days in jail and a fine of $1,000.

A jury was waived, and the trial was before the court.

An inspector of the Liquor Control Board and two deputy sheriffs, operating under a search warrant which they served upon the appellant, searched a mule barn, which was stipulated to be appellant’s premises, and found a quantity of whiskey and wine concealed therein.

Appellant did not testify, but offered one Martin, who testified that the three bottles of wine and the three pints of whiskey found by the officers on appellant’s premises belonged to him.

The issue of facts was resolved against the appellant by the trial court.

Three bills of exception were presented complaining of the argument of the Assistant County Attorney. The careful trial court refused the bills and prepared bills of his own.

A discussion of these bills will not be necessary since they all relate to argument, and, the trial being before the court, it will be presumed that he ignored any improper argument if such were made.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Boston,      May 12, 2009                                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | By:                                                                | /s/      Peter J. Sonnabend |
|   | Name:  Peter      J. Sonnabend                           |
|   | Title:  Executive      Chairman of the Board             |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | By:                                                                | /s/      Stephanie Sonnabend |
|   | Name:  Stephanie      Sonnabend                          |
|   | Title:   Chief      Executive Officer and President |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | By:                                                                | /s/      Boy van Riel |
|   | Name:   Boy      van Riel                           |
|   | Title:   Vice      President and Treasurer          |

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Avicena Group, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Belinda Tsao NivaggioliName:

Belinda Tsao NivaggioliTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 31, 2006






/s/ D. Wayne PetersName:

D. Wayne PetersTitle:

Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 31, 2006


This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: February 15, 2021
S21Y0603
. IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY BULL GRABLE
. P ER C URIAM . T his disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition of Jeffrey Bull Grable (State Bar No. 303870) for voluntary surrender of license prior to the issuance of a formal complaint, brought pu rsuant Bar Rule 4

- 227 (b) (2). Grable, who has been a State Bar member since 1997, is currently under administrative suspension for fail ure to pay dues and complete Continuing Legal Education requirements. Grable admits that he represented an individual client in a dispute with her business co

- owner and agreed to prepare and file a lawsuit on the client’s beh alf, which he did not complete. When the

co - owner sued the client instead, he agreed to file a counterclaim, which he did not complete and file, and a sizable judgment was2

eventually entered against t he client
. Grable became aware of the judgment, bu t failed to advise his client. Grable admits that h is conduct violated Rule s 1.2 (a), 1.3 , and 1.4 (a) (3) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4

- 102 (d). The maximum sanction f or a violation of Rules 1.2 (a) and 1.3 is disbarment and the maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.4 (a) ( 3 ) is a public reprimand. Grable further admits that he was suspended from the practice of law for six months in 2005 based on similar conduct. See In the Matter of Grable , 279 Ga. 1 (607 SE2d 554) (2005). The State Bar has filed a response, in which it recommends that the Court accept Grable’s v oluntary surrender of license. It stipulates to the facts as set forth in Grable’s petition and state s th at the requested discipline level, which is tantamount to disbarment , is appropriate in light of the severity of his admitted conduct and violations and the aggravating factors, as identified in the American Bar Association’s Standards for Imposing Law yer Sanctions, involving his substantial experience in the practice of law and prior3

disciplinary misconduct. See ABA Standards 3.0 (factors generally); 4.41 (lack of diligence); 4.61 (lack of candor); 8.1 (prior disciplinary history ) ; and 9.22 (aggravati ng factors)

. See also In the Matter of Morse , 266 Ga. 652, 652 (470 SE2d 232) (1996) ( stating that this Court looks to the ABA Standards for guidance in determining the appropriate sanction). Having reviewed the petition, we agree to accept Grable’s peti tion for v oluntary surrender of license. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of Jeffrey Bull Grable be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia. Grable is reminded of his duties p ursuant to Bar Rule 4

- 219 (b). Voluntary surrender of license accepted

. All the Justices concur
.
From: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Toni 

Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 10/27/2011 03:44 PM 

Subject: RE: Emissions Data Spreadsheets for Boilers and CISWI rule 

Cortney, 

Just to clarify, are you looking for floor calculations, unit-by-unit test data summaries, or both? 

Thanks! 

Brian 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Toni Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David 

Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 10/27/2011 11:16 AM 

Subject: RE: Emissions Data Spreadsheets for Boilers and CISWI rule 

Thanks Bob! 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [ 

mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 11:16 AM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov; Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov; Jones.Toni@epamail.epa.gov; Cozzie.David@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Re: Emissions Data Spreadsheets for Boilers and CISWI rule 

Cortney - 

I'll ask Brian/Jim to send you the Boiler MACT/Area Source info, and Toni to send you the CISWI information. FYI - 

since Peter reorged SPPD earlier this year, CISWI is now in David Cozzie's Group (Fuels and Incineration Group), so 

I've copied him on this response as well. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs 

Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

From "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Toni Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 10/27/2011 10:51 AM 

Subject: Emissions Data Spreadsheets for Boilers and CISWI rule 

Hi Bob, 

Can we get a copy of the emissions data spreadsheet(s) used for the 

standards, if they are different that what was used for the final rule? 

Thanks, 

Cortney
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4454 

To require the approval by the head of an agency for any conference costing 

more than $25,000, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. FLEISCHMANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the approval by the head of an agency for any 

conference costing more than $25,000, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agency Conferences 

5 and Conventions Operating Under Necessary Trans6 parency Act of 2012’’ or the ‘‘ACCOUNT Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AGENCY CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS. 

8 (a) AGENCY HEAD APPROVAL REQUIRED.—Any con9 ference costing more than $25,000 must be approved in 

10 writing by the head of the relevant agency before the date 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4454 IH

1 on which such conference occurs. The head of an agency 

2 may only approve such conference if the head determines 

3 that the conference is necessary to the core mission of the 

4 agency. 

5 (b) PUBLICATION OF STATEMENT REQUIRED.—Not 

6 later than 30 days after the date of a conference described 

7 in subsection (a), the head of the agency shall publish on 

8 the website of such agency a summary of the conference 

9 that includes the purpose and total cost of the conference 

10 and the cost per employee that attended the conference. 

11 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than Decem12 ber 31 of each year, the head of each agency shall submit 

13 a report, for the previous fiscal year, to the relevant com14 mittees of the Congress that includes a list of each con15 ference approved pursuant to subsection (a) and with re16 gard to each such conference, the following: 

17 (1) A summary of the purposes and goals. 

18 (2) A description of the conference activities 

19 that accomplish such purposes and goals. 

20 (3) The total cost. 

21 (4) The cost per government employee. 

22 (d) EXCLUSION.—The requirements of this section 

23 shall not apply— 

24 (1) to the armed forces; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4454 IH

1 (2) with respect to law enforcement activity; 

2 and 

3 (3) with respect to any conference that the head 

4 of the agency determines is classified or related to 

5 national security. 

6 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the 

8 meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, 

9 United States Code. 

10 (2) ARMED FORCES.—The term ‘‘armed forces’’ 

11 has the meaning given that term in section 2101 of 

12 title 5, United States Code. 

13 (3) CONFERENCE.—The term ‘‘conference’’ 

14 means a meeting of 40 or more employees that is lo15 cated more than 50 miles from the workplace of at 

16 least 20 or more of such employees. 

17 (4) EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘employee’’ has the 

18 meaning given that term in section 2105 of title 5, 

19 United States Code. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FOCUS (6/21/2004) 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 04-0636 

ENGINEER: Prothero \ AH 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

Gen Eqpt: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL: 

None established 

CRSS (06/14/2004): 

Chemical Name: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (06/15/2004): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible 

PBT rating: P1B1T2 . 

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 20 ppb) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 05/27/2004 version of ChemSTEER. 

REVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 04-0636 

Processing: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

unknown 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. 

Conservative: 

from: 

basis: 

from: 

basis: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Inhalation: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 04-0636 

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

unknown 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

from: 

basis: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers: 

Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Dermal: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | -1     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023