alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert J. Evans, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Butte Company (formerly Silver Butte Mining Company)

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

[Not required].

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: January 13, 2005

By:    /s/ Robert J. Evans

Robert J. Evans, Secretary/Treasurer and Director
Exhibit 4.353

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 168614 dated December 30, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 30, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 14, 2018 No. 660-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALFRED TITUS SHULER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CR-96-13-7-BR)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Lee Taylor, RICHARD L. CANNON, III, Greenville, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States

Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Peter W.

Kellen, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Titus Shuler was convicted of four counts of possession

of crack cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841 (West 1981 & Supp. 1997). He was sentenced as a career

offender to a term of 262 months imprisonment. United States

Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, 4B1.1 (Nov. 1996). On

appeal, he asserts that the district court clearly erred in denying

his motion for a downward departure from the career offender guideline range.

A district court's discretionary decision not to depart is not

subject to appellate review. See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d

28, 31 (4th Cir. 1990). Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to

review the issue raised by Shuler. Id.

We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1050
United States of America, for the use and benefit of J. BOBBY CURRIN & SONS, a North Carolina General Partnership, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee, and J & W BUILDERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-95-533-2) Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 George K. Freeman, Jr., ROUNTREE & SEAGLE, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina; Benjamin N. Thompson, THOMPSON & GODWIN, L.L.P., Dunn, North Carolina, for Appellant. C. Hamilton Jarrett, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; James Lynn Werner, Cheryl L. Behymer, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: J. Bobby Currin & Sons (“Currin”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”), in this action filed under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a to 270d (West 1986 & Supp. 1998). Currin sought payment in excess of $310,000 under the payment bondissued by Hartford, as surety, for the work Currin did as a subcontractor on a government project. Hartford asserted in its motion for summary judgment that Currin’s claim was barred by the one-year statute of limitations. See 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b. Currin responded that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precluded Hartford from raising the limitations defense. The district court granted summaryjudgment in Hartford’s favor and dismissed Currin’s action as untimely filed, relying on United States ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 402 F.2d 893, 898 (4th Cir. 1968). We have carefully examined the record, the briefs, and the opinion of the district court. We agree with the district court that Currin failed to satisfy the requirements of equitable estoppel and, therefore, affirm the grant of summary judgment on the reasoning of the district court. See United States ex rel. J. Bobby Currin & Sons v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. , No. CA-95- 533-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument4 based on our prior order granting the unopposed motion to submit the case on briefs.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Crude Oil Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Crude Oil Production from Greater than 200 Meters Deep (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 46     | 46     | 53     | 77     | 90     | 123    | 171    | 228   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 234    | 286    | 288    | 336    | 310    | 305    | 318    | 313    |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 31.2





Certification





I, C. Neil Lyons, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cleveland BioLabs, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: April 30, 2013
By:
/s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History: Annual                                      
|View History: Annual                                      
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|Kansas Natural Gas Processed in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|Kansas Natural Gas Processed in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 142    | 141    | 121    | 88     | 95     | 81     | 76     | 55     | 15    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, James P. Walker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  November 23, 2009 /s/James P. Walker, Jr.     Chief Executive Officer
#### DURDEN v. STATE.

No. 24084.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State..

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is possession of unstamped whiskey upon which no tax had been paid. *159The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.00.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or a statement of facts. The complaint and information seem to be in due form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
**Exhibit 11.1**

 

**OMEGA FLEX, INC.**

**Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share**

 

 

 
|                                        | **Years Ended December 31,**                                  |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | **2005**                                                      | **2004** | **2003** |
|                                        | (dollars in thousands,  

except earnings per share**)** |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Net Income                                  | $7,477                                                        | $6,001 | $4,037 |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Basic Earnings per Common Share:            |                                                          |   |   |
| Net Income                                  | $0.74                                                         | $0.66 | $0.46 |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding   | 10,154                                                        | 9,034 | 8,732 |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Diluted Earnings Per Common Share           |                                                          |   |   |
| Net Income                                  | $0.74                                                         | $0.59 | $0.40 |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | 10,154                                                        | 10,154 | 10,154 |
|                                        |                                                          |   |   |
| Dividends Declared per Share                |                                                          |   |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.



         /s/ PAUL H. SUNU
         -----------------------------------------------

Name:        Paul H. Sunu
Title:       Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
              and Secretary
Date:        August 14, 2003




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp. for the year ending December 31, 2005, I, Joseph Blimline , Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp. |

 
| Date: June 16, 2006                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |
| **Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp.******                        |
|                                                               |
| By: /s/ Joseph Blimline                                            |
| Joseph Blimline 

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4595 

To extend the suspension of duty on Glyoxylic Acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Glyoxylic Acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.01 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Glyoxylic Acid) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS