alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          24,205
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              59
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    139,991
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          56,572
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            56,155
<LOANS>                                        496,497
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,634
<DEPOSITS>                                     645,729
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,613
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,594
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,952
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 743,634
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,899
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,003
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   365
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,267
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,663
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,604
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,095
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,859
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,804
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,122
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,350
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,910
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,545
<RECOVERIES>                                       391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,851
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,851
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Louisiana - South Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 2      | 1      | 4      | 2      | 1      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Southwestern Electric Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Holly Keller Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel__________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








October
31, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board
of Directors of 
CIT Financial USA, Inc:

We have examined management's assertion about CIT Financial USA, Inc.s (the Companys), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America'sUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers("USAP"), to the extent the procedures in such are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Servicing Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I) for CIT Equipment Collateral 2005-VT1.  Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Companys compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the minimum servicing standards.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards, to the extent the procedures in such are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Servicing Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, except as noted in Exhibit I, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



March 28, 2006



---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6681

ANTHONY D. HAWKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNKNOWN OFFICERS, of the City of Baltimore in

the District of Front Hill Southwestern Police

Department; DAVID PHIPPS, E-128, an officer of

the Front Hill Southwestern Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-3509-PJM)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony D. Hawks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Hawks appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Hawks v. Unknown Officers, No. CA-97-3509-PJM (D.

Md. Mar. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chester Leroy Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillary, J.), rendered July 15, 1988, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial where the complaining witness, who had not participated in any pretrial identification procedure, identified him for the first time at trial. We find this argument unpersuasive. A defendant does not have a constitutional right to a lineup *(United States v Brown,*699 F2d 585, 593 [2d Cir 1983]; *People v Simpson,*125 AD2d 347, 348). The record indicates that defense counsel did not inquire as to the possibility of alternative in-court identification procedures and proceeded to explore the weaknesses in the witness’s identification on cross-examination and argue them on summation. Moreover, the inherent suggestiveness of such a procedure was brought to the jury’s attention *(see, People v Bradley,*154 AD2d 609; *People v Merced,*137 AD2d 562).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of a police officer who had identified him at a confirmatory showup in the absence of notice to him pursuant to CPL 710.30 is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the showup occurred within *421minutes of the defendant’s arrest and shortly after the officer had terminated his pursuit. Thus, it merely served to confirm that the right person was arrested and was not an identification procedure within the intendment of the statute *(see, People v Duffy,*152 AD2d 704; *see also, People v Wharton,*74 NY2d 921; *People v London,*160 AD2d 734; *cf., People v Newball,*76 NY2d 587).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining .contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. ¶. 34(a)(2).

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior District Judge for the U.S. ***

District Court for Western Michigan, Grand Rapids, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERIC WESLEY MASON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50070

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-02793-JLS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Pasadena, California

Before: RYMER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior District

Judge.*** 

FILED

FEB 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Defendant Eric Mason appeals from an order of the district court denying his

motion to suppress evidence obtained in the course of a Border Patrol stop along

Interstate 8. Mason argues that at his suppression hearing, the district court

improperly considered the testimony of Agent Herbert Rosette concerning the

frequency of alien smuggling along Interstate 8.

We have previously held that police officers may consider the frequency of a

road’s use as an alien smuggling route in determining whether reasonable

suspicion exists to justify a traffic stop. United States v. Palos-Marquez, 591 F.3d

1272, 1277 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[T]he notoriety of a road as an alien smuggling route

has long been held by numerous courts, including the Supreme Court, as a relevant

factor supporting reasonable suspicion.” (citing United States v. Brignoni-Ponce,

422 U.S. 873, 884–85)). However, the frequent use of a road by alien smugglers is

not, on its own, sufficient to support a reasonable suspicion. United States v.

Manzo-Jurado, 457 F.3d 928, 936 (9th Cir. 2006) (“[A] location or route

frequented by illegal immigrants, but also by many legal residents, is not

significantly probative to an assessment of reasonable suspicion.”).

Here, the district court concluded that Agent Rosette’s stop was justified by

at least eight facts: (1) a truck driver’s gesture directing Agent Rosette’s attention

to Mason’s vehicle, (2) the fact that the car “was a junker,” (3) Agent Rosette’s
3

observation that the vehicle was riding low, (4) Mason’s failure to turn off his right

turn signal, (5) Mason’s nervous demeanor after noticing Agent Rosette, (6) the

car’s expired registration, (7) Agent Rosette’s observation of two heads popping up

from the back seat of the car, and (8) Interstate 8’s popularity as an alien

smuggling venue.

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that, considering the totality of

these circumstances, Agent Rosette’s actions were supported by a reasonable

suspicion that Mason was engaged in criminal activity. See Palos-Marquez, 591

F.3d at 1274–75.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2063
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                      1,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,958
<PP&E>                                          32,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,946
<BONDS>                                            831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,084
<SALES>                                         21,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,862
<CGS>                                           16,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                       696       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4444 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on frames and mountings for 

spectacles, goggles, or the like, the foregoing of plastics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself and Mrs. SCHMIDT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on frames and mountings for spectacles, goggles, or the like, the foregoing 

of plastics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FRAMES AND MOUNTINGS FOR SPECTACLES, 

4 GOGGLES, OR THE LIKE, THE FOREGOING OF 

5 PLASTICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4444 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Frames and mountings for 

spectacles, goggles, or the 

like, the foregoing of plastics (provided for in subheading 9003.11.00) ......... 2.4% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Revolutionary Concepts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald
Carter,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Ronald
      CarterRonald
    CarterPresident and Chief Executive
      OfficerApril 14,
    2009
Exhibit
10.1






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use
of our report dated April 29, 2009, in the Form 20-F: Annual Report dated July
2, 2008, Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, of Poly-Pacific International Inc. for the registration of 79,609,946
shares of its common stock.
  /s/
      K.R. Margetson Ltd.Vancouver,
      BCJune 26,
      2009
                      
                      
                      Signed
                        Chartered Accountant
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 189 (Thursday, September 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58259-58260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee Field Trip

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet 
at the Mapleton Ranger District Office in Florence, OR, on October 12, 
2000, to begin a field trip to Enchanted Valley. The Mapleton Ranger 
District Office is located at 4480 Hwy. 101, Building G, Florence, OR. 
The trip will begin at 9 a.m. and end at approximately 2 p.m.

[[Page 58260]]

Bring a lunch and field gear, including waterproof boots. The public is 
encouraged to attend but must bring its own transportation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541/750-7075 or write to Acting 
Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, 
OR 97339.

    Dated: September 18, 2000.
Y. Robert Iwamoto,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-24864 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M