alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Mitch
      White, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CYOP Systems
      International, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





|1. | The
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
              March
              31, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
              §§78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
              of
              the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:
      June 28, 2006





/s/
      Mitch White


Mitch
      White,


Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4723 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) phosphonium 

sulfate (THPS). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) 

phosphonium sulfate (THPS). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAKIS(HYDROXYMETHYL) PHOSPHONIUM 

4 SULFATE (THPS). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) 

phosphonium sulfate (THPS) 

(CAS No. 55566–30–8) (provided for in subheading 

2931.00.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4723 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4576 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4576

 To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on Clothianidin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on Clothianidin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLOTHIANIDIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.84 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Clothianidin) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``5.8%''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-3723

___________ Billy Lee Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 6, 1996 Filed: December 12, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Billy Lee Smith was convicted by a jury of possession of ephedrine, a listed chemical, with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(1). He was sentenced to 92 months of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, and his conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. The present appeal is taken from district court's 1 denial of Smith's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. After careful consideration of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Smith's motion, and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4698 

To extend the suspension of duty on product mixtures containing 

ethofumesate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on product mixtures 

containing ethofumesate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING 

4 ETHOFUMESATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.19 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 product mixtures containing ethofumesate) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4698 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4527 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on camel hair, carded or combed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COURTNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on camel hair, 

carded or combed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAMEL HAIR, CARDED OR COMBED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.22 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 camel hair, carded or combed) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4527 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1210

CEDRICK E. DRAPER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE C/O MEGAN J. BRENNAN POSTMASTER GENERAL , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville

. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv
- 00070

- GEC )

Submitted : September 29, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020

Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Cedrick Euron Draper , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cedrick Euron Draper appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons state d by the district

court. Draper v. U

. S

. P ostal S erv. , No. 3:18

- cv
- 00070

- GEC (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2018)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would n ot aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
----

**Exhibit      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C.      SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)                    | The                  Report                  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)                    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

|   |  /s/                Timothy J. Tegeler      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Timothy                J.                Tegeler |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer           |
#### UNITED STATES v. PACIFIC FINANCE CORP. et al. UNITED STATES v. PACIFIC FINANCE CORP. et al.

Nos. 12682 and 12683.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

July 29, 1954.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharpe and Edward W. Rothe, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., Malcolm R. Wil-key, U. S. Atty., for the S. D. of Texas; and Charles L. Short, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Wilkey & Short, Houston), for appellant.

Bryan, Suhr & Bering and James P. Bailey, Houston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee Pacific Finance Corporation has urged in its motion for rehearing that this Court erred when it granted appellant’s motions for extensions of time within which to file the records in this Court.

A reconsideration of appellant’s original motion for an extension of time within *460which to file the records in this Court convinces us that good cause did not exist within the 60-day period provided in Rule 386 for failing to file the records, because it is shown that the appellant never ordered the preparation by the District Clerk of the transcripts in these causes until December 17; 1953, 86 days after the final judgments had been entered in the District Court on September 22, 1953, and *\&*days after this Court had granted appellant’s motion — filed November 10, 1953 — for an extension of time within which to file the records in this Court. Matlock v. Matlock, 151 Tex. 308, 249 S.W.2d 587, and Straley v. Commissioners’ Court of Lampasas County, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W.2d 469.

The only grounds contained in .appellant’s first motion, for an extension of time within which to file the records in this Court were “that the preparation of the statements of facts and the transcripts cannot be completed in time to allow the statements of facts and transcripts to be filed with the Clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals within 60 days from the date of the final judgments.” This motion was tirne^ly within Rule 386.

The appellee duly objected to appellant’s motions for an extension of time, pointing out in its answer that the preparation of the records had hot been ordered. After the transcripts had been filed within the extended period, "appellee moved to dismiss the appeals and to strike the transcripts on the ground that, appellant had tailed to show good cause as required by Rule 386. We overruled such motion.

To the extent that appellee’s motion for rehearing alleges 'that we erred in granting an extension of time for filing the records, such motion for rehearing is granted. Our former order granting such motion to extend time is how vacated, and the motion is refused.

Our former judgment reversing and remanding these causes entered June 3, 1954, is set aside, our original opinion filed that date is withdrawn, and judgment now entered dismissing the appeals herein.

If the Supreme • Court should hold that we are in error in dismissing these appeals, then it is the opinion of this Court that its findings and judgment appearing in the withdrawn opinion are correct, and appellant’s and appellee’s motions for rehearing should be refused.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4606 

To authorize the issuance of right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines 

in Glacier National Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of right-of-way permits for natural 

gas pipelines in Glacier National Park, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPE4 LINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

6 issue right-of-way permits for each natural gas pipeline 

7 (including all appurtenances used in the operation of the 

8 natural gas pipeline) that, as of March 1, 2012, is located 

9 within the boundary of Glacier National Park. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4606 IH

1 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A permit issued 

2 under subsection (a) shall be— 

3 (1) issued as a right-of-way renewal, consistent 

4 with laws (including regulations) generally applicable 

5 to utility rights-of-way within units of the National 

6 Park System, including the Act of March 4, 1911 

7 (16 U.S.C. 5); 

8 (2) for a width of not more than 50 feet on ei9 ther side of the centerline of the natural gas pipe10 line; and 

11 (3) subject to any terms and conditions that the 

12 Secretary of the Interior determines to be necessary. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Wyoming Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Wyoming Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 4,430  | 4,563  | 4,391  | 4,538  | 4,631  | 4,416  | 4,271  | 9,366  | 9,255 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9,010  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Tennessee Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Tennessee (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Tennessee Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Tennessee (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 382    | 339    | 298    | 277    | 227    | 14    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 16     | 16     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
United States Department of the Interior 

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 

In Reply Refer To: 

FWS/ AES/DER/BCH/060 156 

FWS HQ: 2012-F-0004 

Ms. Deborah G. Nagle 

Director, Water Permits Division 

Office of Wastewater Management 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Washington, DC 20460 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

MAY n 5 2015 

Subject: Biological Opinion for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector 

General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity 

Dear Ms. Nagle: 

This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion (Opinion) based on our 

review ofthe proposed re-issuance of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MultiSector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity, and its effects 

on listed species and designated critical habitat in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your January 27,2014, request for 

formal consultation was received via email. Additional coordination is described in the attached 

Opinion. 

This Opinion is based on information provided in the January 27, 2014, Biological Evaluation, 

additional information received, and other sources of information. A complete record of this 

consultation is on file at this office. If you have any questions or concerns about this Opinion or the 

consultation process in general, please feel free to contact Ms. Karen Myers (703-358-2353, 

Karen_Myers@fws.gov) or Mr. George Noguchi (703-358-1857, George_Noguchi@fws.gov) of my 

staff. 

Enclosure 

Sincerely, 

~Av~ Craig Aubrey 

1 Chief, Division ofE ironmental Review, 

Ecological Services Program
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 884    | 1,991  | 2,315  | 2,494 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,415  | 2,260  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023