alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
150 SOUTH NINTH STREET 

EL CENTRO, CA 92243-2850 

November 14,2013 

Mr. Michael Guzzetta 

AIR POLL 

Manager, Rule Evaluation Section 

Stationary Source Division 

California Air Resources Board 

1001 "I" Street 

PO Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

DISTRICT 

TELEPHONE: (760) 482-4606 

FAX: (760) 353-9904 

On October 22, 2013 the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors 

(Air Board) unanimously adopted revisions to four existing rules and two new rules, as 

listed below. 

REVISED 

Rule 101 

Rule 206 

Rule 207 

Rule 207 

NEW 

Rule 400.3 

Rule 400.4 

Definitions 

Processing of Applications 

New and Modified Stationary Source Review 

New and Modified Stationary Source Review 

Internal Combustion Engine(s) 

Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Wallboard Kilns 

As part of the Air Board's action approving revisions to Rule 207, the Air Board directed 

the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (Air District) to forward each of the listed 

rules to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions, but clarified that instruction be given to CARB to submit to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) a "SIP version" of Rule 207 which excludes 

specific applicable state-only requirements contained jn the rule. Accordingly, the Air 

District is forwarding to CARB the rules listed above as SIP revisions. The Air District is 

requesting that CARB submit to US EPA the enclosed version of Rule 207 entitled "EPA 

Rule 207 New and Modified Stationary Source Review SIP," as the SIP version of Rule 

207. We have discussed this submittal approach with US EPA and they have stated that 

it is acceptable as long as our public notice and Air Board's action clearly stated our intent 

to submit a version of Rule 207 for inclusion in the SIP which excludes specific state-only 

requirements (See page 2 of board letter). 

NOVEMBER 2013 SIP REVISION REQUEST Page 1 

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 
In addition, EPA informed us that there is pending litigation regarding Rule 207 because 

we were required to submit a revised NSR rule that includes PM2.s program requirements 

December 14, 2012. Therefore the Air District is requesting expedited processing by 

GARB to forvyard this submittal to EPA in order to avoid unnecessary litigation regarding 

Rule 207. 

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact myself or staff at (760) 

482-4606. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ Monica N. Saucier 

APC Division Manager 

cc: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief USEPA Region IX 

NOVEMBER 2013 SIP REVISION REQUEST Page2
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Other States Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Other States Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 37,200 | 17,202 | 17,442 | 16,615 | 14,714 | 12,018 | 10,188 | 11,156 | 9,854 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8,789  | 9,212  | 8,267  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 26656.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 25, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER,' Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful sale of an intoxicating beverage in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail and a fine of $250.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court. ■
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 445 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

deduction of State and local general sales taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Florida (for himself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. ADAMS, Mr. 

ROSS of Florida, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. GRANGER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, and Mr. CRENSHAW) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction of State and local general sales 

taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF 

4 STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

5 Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘, and be7 fore January 1, 2012’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31

                            Section 302 Certification

I, Douglas K. Johnson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
     8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period
     included in the year covered by this annual report, of Allstate Life Global
     Funding Trust 2005-3;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
     servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
     in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor
     and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and
     based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
     that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and
     trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or
     similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
     accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
     Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set
     forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included
     in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Allstate Life Insurance
Company and J.P. Morgan Trust Company National Association and their respective
officers and agents.

Date:    March 28, 2006

By:      /s/ Douglas K. Johnson
         -----------------------------------
         Name:  Douglas K. Johnson
         Title:  President
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 53    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,583  | 3,322  | 5,080  | 6,152  | 6,794  | 22,034 | 4,130  | 2,893  | 14,502 | 8,853 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13,576 | 4,730  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered June 15, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of 4 id to 9 years’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

On this appeal, defendant argues, among other things, that the lineup identification should have been suppressed as tainted by the complainant’s photographic identification. We disagree. As correctly noted by the trial court in denying defendant’s motion to suppress after the hearing held pursuant to *United States v Wade*(388 US 218), there is no evidence that the pretrial identification procedures employed by the police in this case were even remotely suggestive. Moreover, the complainant had an unobstructed view of the defendant for a significant period of time both before and during the robbery, which took place in broad daylight with no other individuals in sight. Accordingly, there was a sufficient independent basis for the witness’s in-court identification of defendant. *(See, People v Ramos,*42 NY2d 834.)

We perceive no error in the trial court’s *Sandoval*ruling *(People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Orgasol polyamide powders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GERLACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Orgasol 

polyamide powders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORGASOL POLYAMIDE POWDERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.39.08 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Orgasol polyamide powders) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4689 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### J. LICHTMAN & SONS, Libelant-Appellant, v. DOLLAR STEAMSHIP LINE, Respondent-Appellee, Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft (Hamburg-American Line), Respondent-Impleaded Appellee.

No. 465.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 12, 1937.

Single & Tyler, of New York City (Alonzo L. Tyler and Wilbur II. llccht, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hicltox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (L. De Grove Potter and Joseph W. Whelan, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Haight, Griffin, Deming & Gardner, of New York City (Wharton Poor and James McKown, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for impleaded-appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (13 F.Supp. 717), affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 25 
          - [TD 8886] 
          - RIN 1545-AX07 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains corrections to TD 8886, which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Monday, June 12, 2000 (65 FR 36908). These regulations relate to the use of actuarial tables in valuing annuities, interests for life or terms of years, and remainder of reversionary interests.                     

# DATES:

Effective June 12, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Blodgett, (202) 622-3090 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are under section 7520 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, TD 8886 contains errors which may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of final regulations (TD 8886), which is the subject of FR Doc. 00-12986, is corrected as follows: 

§ 25.2512-5 

1. On page 36942, § 25.2512-5(d)(2)(v)(A), the first formula of the page, the language 

is corrected to read 

2. On page 36942, § 25.2512-5(d)(2)(v)(B), the second formula running the complete width of the page, the language 

is corrected to read 

Cynthia E. Grigsby 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel, (Modernization & Strategic Planning). 

[FR Doc. 00-24707 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
| **DEBT Senior secured credit facility revolver borrowings (Details) (2014 Facilities [Member], USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 2014 Facilities [Member]                                                                                                                       |                                                                                                                              |
| **Short-term Debt [Line Items]**                                                                                                               |                                                                                                                              |
| Line of credit facility, maximum amount outstanding during period                                                                              | $ 150.0us-gaap_LineOfCreditFacilityMaximumAmountOutstandingDuringPeriod/ us-gaap_ShortTermDebtTypeAxis= pvh_A2014FacilitiesMember |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Maximum amount borrowed under the credit facility at any time during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_LineOfCreditFacilityMaximumAmountOutstandingDuringPeriod**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_ShortTermDebtLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Division of Enforcement James G. Mills Attorney Direct Dial (202 326-3035

Mr. DanW. Reicher Assistant Secretary UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 ·

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Department ofEnergy Washington, DC 20585 August 20, 1998 Dear

### Mr. Reicher: Thankyou for your letterrequesting that the Commission consider eliminating loading style as a product subcategory for residential clothes washers. I have asked the Office ofthe Secretary to place your letter onthe Commission's public record. You are probably aware that the Consortium for Energy Efficiency, Inc. ("CEE") petitioned the Commission in March ofthis yearto eliminate the top-loading and front-loading subcategories from Appendix F (Clothes Washers) ofthe Appliance Labeling Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 305 (1998). Your letter, and the reasons you advance in it for eliminating the subcategories,

. will receive the Commission's attention during the course ofits consideration ofCEE's petition. Very truly yours,

# d::.M~Aa
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 28, 2010





/s/  "Ruth Swan"

Ruth Swan,

Chief Financial Officer













#