alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2179 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary 

of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to United 

Service Organizations, Incorporated, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2011 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to United Service 

Organizations, Incorporated, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY RECOV4 ERED AT AIRPORT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS. 

5 (a) DONATION TO USO.—Section 44945 of title 49, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘shall be re7 tained by the Transportation Security Administration’’ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2179 IH

1 and all that follows before the period at the end and in2 serting ‘‘shall be annually transferred, without further ap3 propriation, by the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Secu4 rity (Transportation Security Administration) to United 

5 Service Organizations, Incorporated, to provide funding 

6 for its activities in support of USO airport centers’’. 

7 (b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 515(b) of the De8 partment of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 

9 (118 Stat. 1318) is amended by striking ‘‘and specifically 

10 how the unclaimed money is being used to provide civil 

11 aviation security’’ and inserting ‘‘and the amount of un12 claimed money transferred to United Service Organiza13 tions, Incorporated, and the dates of such transfers’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.8(iii)

                                  AMENDMENT TWO
                                  -------------
                                       TO
                                       --
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                              --------------------

      This AMENDMENT THREE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT by and between Anthem
Insurance Companies, Inc., an Indiana mutual insurance company (the "Company")
and Keith R. Faller (the "Executive") hereby amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(the "Agreement") between the parties dates as of the 1st day of January,
1999, as follows:

1. Effective January 1, 2001, Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the termination date and inserting in place thereof the 31st of
December, 2003.

2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this
AMENDMENT TWO TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT effective as of the day and year first
above written.

Keith R. Faller                            Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.


 /s/ Keith R. Faller                       By: /s/ Larry C. Glasscock
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
                                           Name: Larry C. Glasscock

                                           Title: President and CEO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4583 

To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 

carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose 

rayon, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for 

spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON, NOT 

4 CARDED, COMBED OR OTHERWISE PROC5 ESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.55.04 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 staple fibers of viscose rayon, not carded, combed or other9 wise processed for spinning) is amended by striking the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4583 IH

1 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

2 2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves New Field Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 2      | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4635 

To extend the suspension of duty on Phenylisocyanate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALTMIRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Phenylisocyanate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHENYLISOCYANATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Phenylisocyanate) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4615 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4615

    To extend and modify the reduction of the duty on Sulfentrazone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Schock introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend and modify the reduction of the duty on Sulfentrazone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SULFENTRAZONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.57 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Sulfentrazone) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``3.2%'' and inserting ``5.1%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|California Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in California (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|California Onshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in California (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 12,575 | 14,083 | 13,192 | 12,344 | 10,551 | 9,422  | 9,369  | 8,659 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,773  | 7,398  | 6,861  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4684 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4684

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUOPYRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        N-{2-[3-Chloro-5-   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (trifluoromethyl)-                                                12/31/2015
                          2-
                          pyridinyl]ethyl}-
                          alpha,alpha,alpha-
                          trifluoro-o-
                          toluamide
                          (Fluopyram) (CAS
                          No. 658066-35-4)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.39.21)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4525 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4525

  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on camel hair, processed 
             beyond the degreased or carbonized condition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Courtney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on camel hair, processed 
             beyond the degreased or carbonized condition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAMEL HAIR, PROCESSED BEYOND THE DEGREASED OR CARBONIZED 
              CONDITION.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to camel hair, processed beyond 
the degreased or carbonized condition) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### William F. Fehringer, P.C.S., P. C., Appellant, v Thomas Crimmins Contracting Corp., Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and cross motion denied. Memorandum: The court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and in granting defendant a conditional order of preclusion (CPLR 3042 [c], [e]). Plaintiff served a summons and verified complaint, dated June 8, 1989, alleging causes of action for breach of contract and account stated, and demanding judgment in the amount of $49,425.25. With its answer of July 11, 1989, defendant served a demand for a bill of particulars requesting, *inter alia,*specifics of the services rendered by plaintiff and information regarding how the value of each service was calculated.

Without responding to the demand, plaintiff moved, on August 15, 1989, for summary judgment. In support of the motion, plaintiff offered account reconciliation statements, invoices, work orders and correspondence which established its entitlement to judgment on the account stated in the amount of $49,425.25 *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Parker Chapin*
      *983
      *Flattau & Klimpl v Daelen Corp.,*59 AD2d 375). Defendant opposed the motion on the sole basis that its demand for a bill of particulars showed that there are unresolved questions of fact. Additionally, defendant cross-moved to dismiss the complaint and for a conditional order of preclusion based on plaintiffs failure timely to respond to or to move against the demand for a bill.

At the time it moved for summary judgment, plaintiff was not subject to an order of preclusion and thus was not barred from establishing its entitlement to summary judgment. Since plaintiff established its cause of action "sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment” in its favor (CPLR 3212 [b]), defendant "was required to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material questions of fact” *(Iselin & Co. v Mann Judd Landau,*71 NY2d 420, 425; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Defendant failed in this regard, and the court should have granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Burke, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m., Thursday, February 10, 2000.

# PLACE: 

Room 5030, South Building, Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

                        1. Current telecommunications industry issues.                        Start Printed Page 5308

2. Status of PBO planning and recommendations to accelerate privatization of the Bank.

3. Procedure for issuing class C share certificates.

4. Procedure to replace lost share certificates.

5. Administrative issues.

# ACTION:

Board of Directors Meeting.

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m., Friday, February 11, 2000.

# PLACE: 

Room 104-A, The Williamsburg Room, Department of Agriculture, 12th & Jefferson Drive, SW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the Board of Directors meeting:

1. Call to order.

2. Action on Minutes of the November 9, 1999, board meeting.

3. Report on loans approved in the first quarter of FY 2000.

4. Review first quarter financial statements for FY 2000.

5. Privatization Committee report.

6. Discussion of Privatization Committees' recommendations to:

(a) Contract for a financial advisor to assist the Bank in its preparations for privatization.

(b) Transfer funds to be used for the financial advisor contract from the Bank's Liquidating Account at the U.S. Treasury to a private financial institution.

7. Consideration of resolution to change the procedure for issuing class C share certificates.

8. Consideration of resolution to modify the procedure for replacing lost share certificates.

9. Consideration of resolution to adopt a schedule for various actions concerning the November 2000 Board of Directors election.

10. Consideration of resolution to appoint Tellers for the November 2000 Board of Directors election.

11. Consideration of resolution to approve Kenneth M. Ackerman to serve as the Assistant Treasurer.

12. Adjournment.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Roberta D. Purcell, Assistant Governor, Rural Telephone Bank, (202) 720-9554.

Dated: January 28, 2000.

Christopher McLean,

Acting Governor, Rural Telephone Bank.

[FR Doc. 00-2451 Filed 2-1-00; 10:30 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Texas--RRC District 7B Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 90     | 141    | 145   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 140    | 184    | 258    | 218    | 165    | 143    | 116    | 110    | 118    | 93    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 84     | 77     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 242nd District Court of Castro County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on July 8, 2014,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Lance Brandon Loudder, 2L Farms, a Texas Partnership,

and Terri Loudder v. Crop Quest, Inc.

Case Number: 07-13-00185-CV Trial Court Number: B9355-1108

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 8, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellants pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 14, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK