Filed 11/17/20 In re V.H. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). T his opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re V .H

. , a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPL E,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

V .H

. , Defendant and Appellant. D07 7530

(Super. Ct. No. J241608 )

APPEAL from a j udgment of the Superior Court of San Dieg o County , Kathleen M. Lewis, Judge. Affirmed. Christine M. Aros, under appointment b y the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No response from Plaintiff and Respondent. In June 2019, following an adjudication hearing the court made true findings on a petition filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging V.H . (the Minor) committed several offenses. The court found the Minor had committed assault by force likely to cause great bodily injury (Pen

.2

Code , 1 § 245, subd. (a)(4)) and battery with serious bodily injury ( § 243, subd. (d)). The court also found the M inor personally inflicted great bodily injury on the victim within the meaning of sections 12022.7, subd ivision (a) and 1192.7, subd ivision (c)(8). This court affirmed the adjudication in an unpublished opinion filed May 2 7 , 2020. ( People v

. V.H

. (May 27 , 2020, D076300) [nonpub. opn.]

. ) In March 2020, the juvenile court held a hearing on a request for victim restitution from the California Victim Compensation Board. Following the hearing and the review of records submitted by the Board, the court order ed restitution in the amount of $24,7 3 0.10. The court found the Minor and her mother (K.Z.) jointly and severally liable for the restitution ordered. The Minor has filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Pe ople v

. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) indicating she has not been able to identify any arguable issue s for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the record for error as mandated by Wende . We offered the Minor the opportunity to file h er own brief on appeal, but she has not responded.
STATEMENT OF FACTS The facts regarding restitution are well summarized in the Minor ’ s opening brief. We will adopt the summary for convenience

. The victim agreed the restitution review hearing was abo ut her loss of income of approximately $5,000, which she received from the V ictim
C ompensation B oard. She was out of work for a whole year. State disability paid 50 percent of her wages and the victim compensation board paid another 23 percent. She prov ided documents showing lost wages and medical records

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified

.3

to the compensation board. Her doctor indicated she was able to work for three hours a day. Before the incident, the victim supplemented her income by creating costumes and fashion but that was just a “ side hustle ” and did
not make income for her house. She had a “ real job ” which paid her $16 an hour. She is now partially blind and has an implant in her left eye.
The victim did not know whether V.H. had a restraining order against her. However, a ccording to Exhibit 3, a restraining order was obtained against her on February 17, 2017, before the incident in 2018, and was set to expire on February 17, 2022.
DISCUSSION As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks
the court t o review the record for error. To assist the court in its review and in compliance with Anders v

. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders ), counsel has identified one issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Did the cou rt err in ordering $24,730.10 in restitution to be paid to the V ictim C ompensation B oard

. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders

. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal

. Competent counsel has repre sented the Minor on this appeal.4 DISPOSITION
The restitution order is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

AARON, J.