57798 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 26, 2000 / Proposed Rules

organizational units and removes the

property being replaced from a different

organizational unit.

§ 102–39.65 What are the sales methods?

(a) You must use the methods, terms,

and conditions of sale, and the forms

prescribed in § 101–45.304 of this title

in the sale of property being replaced,

except that the provisions of § 101–

45.304–2(a) of this title regarding

negotiated sales are not applicable.

Section 3709, Revised Statutes (41

U.S.C. 5), specifies the following

conditions under which property being

replaced can be sold by negotiation,

subject to obtaining such competition as

is feasible:

(1) The reasonable value involved in

the contract does not exceed $500; or

(2) Otherwise authorized by law.

(b) You may sell property being

replaced by negotiation at fixed prices

in accordance with the provisions of

§ 101–45.304–2(b) of this title.

§ 102–39.70 What are the accounting

requirements for the proceeds of sale?

You must account for sales proceeds

in accordance with the general finance

and accounting rules applicable to you.

Except as otherwise directed by law, all

proceeds from the sale of personal

property under this part will be

available during the fiscal year in which

the property was sold and for one fiscal

year thereafter for obligation for the

purchase of replacement property. Any

sales proceeds not applied to

replacement purchases during this time

must be deposited in the United States

Treasury as miscellaneous receipts in

the general fund.

§ 102–39.75 What am I required to report?

(a) You must submit, within 90

calendar days after the close of each

fiscal year, a summary report in a format

of your choice on the exchange/sale

transactions made under this part

during the fiscal year (except for

transactions involving books and

periodicals in your libraries). The report

must include:

(1) A list by Federal Supply

Classification Group of property sold

under this part showing the:

(i) Number of items sold;

(ii) Acquisition cost;

(iii) Proceeds;

(iv) Cost of sales; and

(v) The source from which the

property was originally acquired, i.e.,

new procurement, excess, forfeiture, or

another source other than new

procurement.

(2) A list by Federal Supply

Classification Group of property

exchanged under this part showing the:

(i) Number of items exchanged;

(ii) Acquisition cost;

(iii) Exchange allowance; and

(iv) The source from which the

property was originally acquired, i.e.,

new procurement, excess, forfeiture, or

another source other than new

procurement.

(b) Submit your report electronically

or by mail to the General Services

Administration, Personal Property

Management Policy Division (MTP),

1800 F St. NW, Washington DC 20405.

(c) Report control number: 1528–

GSA–AN.

(d) If you make no transactions under

this part during a fiscal year, you must

submit a report stating that no

transactions occurred.

Dated: September 21, 2000.

David A. Drabkin,

Acting Associate Administrator for

Governmentwide Policy.

[FR Doc. 00–24661 Filed 9–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–24–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 22

[WT Docket No. 97–112, CC Docket No. 90–

6, FCC 97–110]

Cellular Service and Other Commercial

Mobile Radio Service in the Gulf of

Mexico

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

SUMMARY: On April 25, 2000 (65 FR

24168), the Commission published

proposed rules in the Second Further

Notice, which proposed changes to its

cellular service rules for the Gulf of

Mexico Service Area (‘‘GMSA’’) and

proposed licensing and service rules for

operations in the Gulf of Mexico by

other commercial mobile radio service

providers. This document corrects the

Federal Register as it appeared.

DATES: Comments on the Regulatory

Flexibility Analysis are due October 26,

2000. Reply comments are due

November 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: All comments and reply

comments may be filed with Magalie

Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary,

TW–A306, Federal Communications

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Davida Grant, Commercial Wireless

Division, (202) 418–7050.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Federal Communications Commission

published a document proposing to

amend part 22 of the Commission’s

rules in the Federal Register on April

25, 2000 (65 FR 24168). The

Commission inadvertently omitted to

include the Regulatory Flexibility

Analysis and comment dates for the

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. This

document corrects the Federal Register

as it appeared. In FR Doc. 00–10221,

published on April 25, 2000, 65 FR

24168, the Commission is adding the

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

immediately preceding the Paperwork

Reduction Act on page 24169, in

column one.

Electronic and Paper Filing

Comments and reply comments may

be filed with the FCC using the

Commission’s Electronic Comment

Filing System (‘‘ECFS’’) or by filing

paper copies. See Electronic Filing of

Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,

63 FR 24,121 (1998). Parties may also

submit an electronic comment by

Internet e-mail. Parties who choose to

file by paper must file an original and

four copies of each filing. If you want

each Commissioner to receive a copy of

your comments, you must file an

original plus eleven copies. All filings

must be sent to the Commission’s

Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office

of the Secretary, TW–A306, Federal

Communications Commission, 445 12th

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.

Parties who choose to file by paper

should also submit their comments on

diskette. A 3.5-inch diskette formatted

in an IBM compatible format using

Microsoft Word for Windows or

compatible software Diskettes should be

submitted to: Davida Grant, Federal

Communications Commission, Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th

Street, S.W., Room 4–C241, Washington,

D.C. 20554. The diskette should be

accompanied by a cover letter and

should be submitted in ‘‘read only’’

mode. The diskette should be clearly

labeled with the commenter’s name,

proceeding (including the docket

number in this case—WT Docket No.

97–112, CC Docket No. 90–6), type of

pleading (comments or reply

comments), date of submission, and the

name of the electronic file on the

diskette. The label also should include

the following phrase, ‘‘Disk Copy—Not

an Original.’’ Each diskette should

contain only one party’s pleadings,

preferably in a single electronic file. In

addition, commenters must send

diskette copies to the Commission’s

copy contractor, International

Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 26, 2000 / Proposed Rules 57799

1Petroleum Comms., Inc. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 1164

(D.C. Cir. 1994).

2See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the

Communications Act — Competitive Bidding, PP

Docket No. 93–253, Fifth Report and Order, 9 FCC

Rcd 5532, 5608, ¶ 175 (1994).

In FR Doc. 00–10221 published on

April 25, 2000 (65 FR 24168) add the

following information.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

As required by Section 603 of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, the

Commission has prepared an Initial

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

(‘‘IRFA’’) of the expected impact on

small entities of the policies and rules

proposed in this Second Further Notice

of Proposed Rule Making. Written

public comments are requested on the

IRFA. Comments must be identified as

responses to the IRFA and must be filed

by the deadlines for comments on the

Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule

Making provided above in section V(D).

The Secretary shall send a copy of this

Notice, including the IRFA, to the Chief

Counsel for Advocacy of the Small

Business Administration in accordance

with paragraph 603(a) of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

Reason for Action: In order to

reexamine our cellular service rules as

they apply to the Gulf of Mexico Service

Area (‘‘GMSA’’) we initiated this

rulemaking proceeding. Since the

establishment of the GMSA, conflict has

arisen between the GMSA licensees, and

the land-based cellular service providers

in the Gulf of Mexico Region over the

provision of service to coastal areas.

Further, the United States Court of

Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit has instructed us to reexamine

certain of our cellular licensing policies

insofar as they apply to GMSA

licensees.1

Objectives: Our objectives in this

rulemaking proceeding are (1) to

establish comprehensive rules that will

reduce conflict between GMSA

licensees and land-based cellular

service providers, (2) provide regulatory

flexibility, to GMSA licensees, that

recognizes the inherent transitory nature

of water-based cellular cites, and (3)

award licenses so as to maximize the

use of spectrum in, and provide high

quality service to, highly traveled

coastal waters.

Legal Basis: The proposed action is

authorized under the Communications

Act, Sections 4(i), 7, 303(c), 303(f),

303(g), 303(r), and 332, 47 U.S.C.

§§ 154(i), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), 303(r),

332, as amended.

Description of and, Number of, Small

Entities Affected by the Proposed Rule:

The rule changes proposed in this

proceeding will affect all small

businesses which provide cellular

service in the GMSA or coastal areas.

The Commission will be required, in its

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to

estimate the number of small entities to

which the rule will apply, provide a

description of such entities, and assess

the impact of the rule on such entities.

To assist in this analysis, commenters

are requested to provide information

regarding how many total entities,

existing and potential, will be affected

by the rules proposed in this Second

Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

We particularly seek estimates of the

number of entities, existing and

potential, that will be considered small

businesses. The definition of ‘‘small

business’’ approved by the Small

Business Administration, and used in

the PCS C–Block auction, is a firm that

has had revenues of less than $40

million in each of the last three calendar

years.2 We seek comment as to whether

it would be appropriate to extend this

definition to this context. We further

request that each commenter identify

whether it is a small business under this

definition. If the commenter is a

subsidiary of another entity, this

information should be provided for both

subsidiary and the parent entity.

Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other

Compliance Requirements: This

information is supplied in the Paper

Work reduction Act, infra.

Federal Rules Which Overlap,

Duplicate or Conflict With These Rules:

None.

Any Significant Alternatives

Minimizing the Impact on Small Entities

Consistent with the Stated Objectives:

The objective of the current rulemaking

proceeding is to improve the quality of

service provided in the Gulf region, and

to establish rules that accurately reflect

the realities of both water-based and

land-based service providers. To the

extent that this rulemaking modifies

existing regulations, it is our objective to

communicate a benefit to all service

providers in the Gulf region without

regard to the size of the entity. The

impact on small entities in the

proposals in the Second Further Notice

of Proposed Rulemaking is the

opportunity to provide service in

accordance with a regulatory framework

that accurately reflects the geographic

and demographic realities of the region.

Given the low burden of compliance,

reporting, and performance

requirements for the provision of

cellular service, no alternatives to these

requirements were deemed necessary

for small entities. This Second Further

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking solicits

comment on the variety of alternatives

discussed herein, any significant

alternatives submitted in the comments

will be considered.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–24643 Filed 9–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00–2111, MM Docket No. 99–284; RM–

9697)

Radio Broadcasting Services;

Galveston and Missouri City, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This document requests

further comment on a proposal filed on

behalf of KQQK License, Inc., licensee

of Station KQQK–FM, Channel 293C,

Galveston, Texas, proposing the

reallotment of Channel 293C from

Galveston to Missouri City, Texas, and

the modification of the Station KQQK–

FM license to specify Missouri City as

the community of license. 64 FR 55223,

published October 12, 1999. The

original Notice of Proposed Rule Making

proposed the modification of the Station

KQQK–FM license as a first local

service for Missouri City. However, on

August 30, 2000, the Commission

adopted a Report and Order in MM

Docket No. 99–26, DA 00–2057, released

September 8, 2000, which substituted

Channel 287A for Channel 285A at

Galveston, Texas, reallotted Channel

287A to Missouri City, and modified the

license of Station KLTO to specify

operation on Channel 287A at Missouri

City. As a consequence, the proposal in

this proceeding will no longer be

providing a first local service to

Missouri City. For this reason, the

Commission is affording KQQK License

and other interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the proposal

in the context of a competitive service

for Missouri City and the removal of the

sole local FM service from Galveston.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before November 7, 2000, and reply

comments on or before November 22,

2000.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal

Communications Commission,

Washington, DC, 20554. In addition to

filing comments with the FCC,