alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
             SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
             EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
             STATEMENTS OF SHONEY'S, INC.
             FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 6,
             2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
             ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
             SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-06-2000
<CASH>                            5,096,871
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    11,628,418
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,220,132
<INVENTORY>                      34,688,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 65,646,319
<PP&E>                          588,901,223
<DEPRECIATION>                  335,799,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  343,465,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           110,934,039
<BONDS>                         334,927,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         50,625,410
<OTHER-SE>                     (209,963,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    343,465,391
<SALES>                         633,620,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                653,293,359
<CGS>                           576,744,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   666,953,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 61,604,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               28,604,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (13,660,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                        436,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (14,096,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                      190,290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                    (13,331,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.26)





</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 08-0074

((((((((((((((((

Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. And James B. Bonham Corporation, Petitioners

v.

Randy Reynolds, Respondent 

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.Pursuant to the notice of bankruptcy of *Thomas O. Bennett, Jr., et al.*, filed with this Court on August 12, 2008, this case is **ABATED** effective as of August 6, 2008.

2.This case is abated pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion.  Tex. R. App. P. 8.3.  All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated.  Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8.3.  It is the parties' responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the automatic bankruptcy stay is lifted.

Done at the City of Austin, this 22nd day of August, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.4
 
 CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
 ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Global Green Matrix Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 Date:   April 28, 2011
 
 
 /s/Randy Hayward
 Randy Hayward
 President,
 Acting Chief Executive Officer, and
 Acting Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
  
   This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Pervasip Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August
31, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul H. Riss, Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended August 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pervasip Corp.

|Date: October 22, 2012 | By: | /s/ Paul H. Riss                                                                        | 
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Paul H. Riss                                                                            | 
|                       |     | Principal Executive Officer,
        Principal Financial Officer
        Pervasip Corp.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2377

ELIZABETH ANN FLATER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-94-632-WMN)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 11, 1996

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Ann Flater, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Lori

Joan Dym, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Ann Flater appeals from the district court's grant

of summary judgment for the Defendant in her Title VII case alleging discrimination based on gender. Specifically, Flater alleged

that the United States Postal Service discriminated against her on

account of her sex when they promoted a male employee to a position

for which she had bid. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Flater v. Runyon, No. CA-94-632-WMN (D. Md. May 31,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15

- 908 V

Filed: July 31, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

DANIEL DIVACK

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Uncontested;

Causation

- In

- Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Danielle Strait, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.

Lisa Ann Watts , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On August 20, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered on September 29, 2012 . Petition at

1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special

Masters.

On July 31, 2017

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in whic h he states that he

does not contest that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, “ [i]t is respondent ’ s position that petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the newly revised Vaccine Injury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Pr omotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation ( “ QAI ” ). Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees

that “ [a]lthough the revised Table only governs petitions filed on or after the effective date of the final rule, the evidence shows that petitioner suffered GBS following the

admini stration of a seasonal flu vaccine, and that the onset occurred within the time period specified in the Table. ” Id. at 3

- 4. Therefore, “[r] ecognizing that petitioner may

re

- file this petition and be afforded a presumption of causation under the revised Ta ble, respondent will not conte s t entitlement to compensation in this case .” Id . at 4 (internal

citation omitte d)

. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIFCO Industries, Inc. ("Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Jeffrey P. Gotschall,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                     /s/  Jeffrey P. Gotschall
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Jeffrey P. Gotschall
                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     May 20, 2003





Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to SIFCO Industries, Inc. and will
be retained by SIFCO Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Van Walker, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), rendered September 19, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Sanchez,*65 NY2d 436; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *People v Roopchand,*107 AD2d 35, *affd*65 NY2d 837; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,581-06

EX P ARTE TRACY DION WHITAKER, A ppl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 18CR20817C IN THE 123 DISTRICT COURT R D F ROM SHELB Y COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity and was sentenc e d to f if ty y ear s’ i mprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of hab ea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant conte nds that plea wa s involuntary beca use trial counse l failed to consult with a mental health expert and failed to investiga te or call Applicant’s co-de fenda nt to testify

. Applicant has allege d fac ts that, if true, mi g ht entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 3 9 3 S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing2

the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant i s i n d ige nt and wants t o b e repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant would have i n s isted on a trial but for counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial court may make a ny other finding s and conc lusions that it deems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laims. The trial court shall make findings o f fa ct and conclusions of law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objec tions, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: F ebrua

ry 2, 2022 Do not publish
#### Fendall G. WINSTON, Jr., as Guardian, etc., et al., Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF MINNEAPOLIS.

No. 11010.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 28, 1937.

Le Roy Bowen and James I. Best, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellants.

Clark R. Fletcher, James E. Dorsey, John Junell, Leavitt R. Barker, and Joseph H. Colman, all of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed with prejudice, but without costs to either party-in this court, per stipulation of .parties.
03-13-00726-CR 

STATE OF TEXAS § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE THIRD COURT 

vs. OF APPEALS 

CARET JOHNSON TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FIL E PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

Now comes Caret Johnson, by and through Adam Reposa and files this request for an 

extension of time to file a Petition for Discretionary Review, and shows the following: 

1) Appellant file a writ of habeas corpus and a hearing was conducted. 

2) Appellant filed an appeal with the Third Courts of Appeals and the Motion for rehearing 

was denied on September 30"^, 2015. 

3) Appellants desire to file a Petition for Discovery Review, The deadline is today 

November 30^ 2015. 

4) Counsel for Appellant needs additional time to complete the Petition and Counsel has not 

requested any prior extensions. 

This motion is not made for purposes of delay but that justice may be done. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays that the Court enter its 

order extending the filing date. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Adam T. King Blackwell Reposa 

1106 San Antonio 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel: (512) 476-7376 

Fax: (512) 478-1114 

Adam Y. Ki;(g Blackwell Reposa 

State Bar No. 24040163 

Attorney for Defendant 

PD-1558-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/1/2015 10:23:33 AM

Accepted 12/1/2015 4:12:23 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served to the Travis County 

Attorney's Office via fa^ n this 30'" day of November, 2015. 

T 

Adam T. King Blackwell Reposa 

Attorney for Defendant
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4521 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 

blend. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COURTNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic 

biodegradable polymer blend. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER 

4 BLEND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4521 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Thermoplastic biodegradable 

polymer blend containing 

1,4-benzenedicarboxylic 

acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 1,4-butanediol and 

hexanedioic acid (CAS No. 

55231–08–8 and/or 1,4- 

benzenedicarboxylic acid 

polymer with 1,4 butanediol 

and decanedioic acid (CAS 

No. 28205–74–5)(provided 

for in subheading 

3913.90.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. WONG JIM TOY, Next Friend and Father of Wong Foon Gwock, Relator-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 452.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 6, 1937.

James C. Thomas, of New York City, for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Clarence W. Roberts, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Robert L. Edwards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                           |  |                        
|------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                                           | 
|/s/ Robert L. Edwards                      |  |                        
|Robert L. Edwards, Chief Financial Officer |  | Date: February 26, 2007