alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 51    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 53     | 55     | 57     | 64     | 75     | 86     | 73     | 77     | 88     | 102   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 89     | 85     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### BOSTIC v. BOSTIC.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 22, 1954.

*60E. J. Picklesimer, Pikeville, for appellant.

V. R. Bentley, Pikeville, for appellee.

DUNCAN, Justice.

The judgment appealed from cancels a deed executed by appellee, Louisa J. Bostic, to her son, the appellant, Henry Bostic.

Appellee, now eighty-three years of age and infirm physically and mentally, executed a deed on September 10, 1945, by which she conveyed to appellant a tract of land in Pike County in consideration of the promise on the part of the grantee to provide support and maintenance for the balance of her life. The circumstances of its execution, the confidential relation of the parties, and the physical and mental condition of the grantor are strongly suggestive of fraud, undue influence, or both. However, the five-year statute of limitations, KRS 413.120, precludes our sustaining the judgment on that ground.

It is established beyond any question that an agreement for future support will constitute a valid consideration for the conveyance of real estate. It is equally well settled that a failure to substantially perform the agreement on the part of the grantee will authorize rescission of the contract. Wireman v. Wireman, 259 Ky. 120, 81 S.W. 2d 908; Gabbard v. Watkins, 280 Ky. 257, 133 S.W.2d 54.

The evidence discloses that Mrs. Bostic resided with her son for only a few weeks after the execution of the deed. She then moved to the home of her son-in-law, where she has since remained except for short visits to her other children, including appellant. She was not treated kindly by appellant’s wife, and her infrequent visits to his home were unpleasant on that account. Appellant admits that he has spent only about $100 for clothing, medicine, and other items of maintenance for his mother, but in itemizing the expenditures, it is apparent that even this figure is grossly exaggerated. We agree with the Chancellor that appellant has failed to perform his agreement and the consideration supporting the conveyance has failed.

Appellant insists that he has at all times been willing and able to perform his part of the agreement and relies upon a number of cases which hold that when the grantor puts-it out of the power of the grantee to render the support contemplated, the grantee is not responsible for the failure. In support of his position, he cites Hunt v. Hunt, 303 Ky. 750, 199 S.W.2d 440; Sykes v. Hurd, 195 Ky. 560, 242 S.W. 853; and Hatfield v. Harris, 197 Ky. 490, 247 S.W. 729.

Appellant testified that he and his. wife are now separated and a divorce action is pending between them. His daughter is old enough to keep house and do the cooking, and he expresses a present willingness to share his home with his mother and provide her with the necessary support and. maintenance. We do not think appellant can bring himself within the rule announced in the cited cases by this belated! offer.to perform the agreement.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have
      issued our report dated March 28, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Fortress International
      Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent
      to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
      of Fortress International Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-142906,
      effective May 14, 2007) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-123504, effective May 18,
      2007).




/s/ Grant
      Thornton LLP





Baltimore,
      Maryland


March
      28,
      2008
| Delaware                                                                                                                          | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|     (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)                                                            | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|      200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10016(Address of principal executive offices, and zip code) |
| Title of each class           | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|-------------------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Common Stock, $1.00 par value | PVH               | New York Stock Exchange                   |

----

By-Laws of PVH Corp., as amended through April 29, 2019.

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | By:    /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                                                                               |
|   |         Mark D. Fischer        Executive Vice President |
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 1      | 35     | 1      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 1:05 PM

To: 'brian@camerasupport.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - West Coast Aerilas, LLC

Tracking Tracking: Recipient Read

'brian@camerasupport.com'

Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Bouffiou, Dale (FAA) Read: 3/30/2015 1:07 PM

Cooper, Thuy (FAA)

ATTN: Mr. Randy Gomez

Dear Mr. Brian Philbrook:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0937).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed

UAS operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be

located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 4/13/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
EXHIBIT 13

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "annual report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

     1. the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: June 28, 2005
                                                                  Giora Ben-Zeev
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                                                        Amir Hai
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 5, 2016 5 21074

________________________________ In the Matter of MICKAYLA WW., Alleged to be a Person in Need of Supervision.
SULLIVAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Respondent; MICKAYLA WW., Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: March 23, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose, Lynch and Aarons, JJ.

__________ Jane M. Bloom, Monticello, for appellant. Glen H. Rosenstein, Sullivan County Department of Family Services, Monticello, for respondent.

__________ Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (McGuire, J.), entered December 29, 2014, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 7, temporarily placed respondent in petitioner's custody. Petitioner filed a juvenile delinquency petition against respondent (born in 2001) and, at respondent's arraignment, requested that she undergo an inpatient psychological evaluation. Family Court granted petitioner's request and issued an initial order placing respondent in petitioner's custody and remanding her for an inpatient evaluation at a mental health facility.-2- 521074

After the completion of the evaluation, the parties agreed that petitioner would withdraw the juvenile delinquency petition and file a person in need of supervision (hereinafter PINS) petition in its place. Respondent then admitted to the allegations in the PINS petition and, following fact-finding and dispositional hearings, Family Court issued a December 2014 order pursuant to Family Ct Act § 739 temporarily remanding respondent to the care and custody of petitioner and detaining her at a residential treatment facility pending a final dispositional order. Respondent appeals from this temporary order. The appeal must be dismissed. Inasmuch as both the language of Family Court's December 2014 detention order and its statutory authority contemplate further proceedings related to the underlying PINS petition (see Family Ct Act § 739 [a]), it is a nondispositional order. Accordingly, the order is not appealable as of right, and respondent never sought leave to appeal from it (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of McCoy v McCoy, 134 AD3d 1206, 1207 [2015]; Matter of Tina X. v John X., 134 AD3d 1174, 1175 [2015]). Further, we decline to treat respondent's notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal, as the order has been superceded by a final order of disposition. Respondent's additional challenge to Family Court's initial order directing that she undergo an inpatient mental health evaluation is also not properly before us. Generally, "only an appeal from a final order brings up for review a prior order issued in the proceeding" (Matter of Christian NN. [Luis OO.], 91 AD3d 1148, 1148 [2012]; see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). In any event, we note that the evaluation was completed and the resulting report was admitted into the hearing record without objection. Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Lynch and Aarons, JJ., concur.-3- 521074

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
#### McELROY v. STATE.

No. 23281.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1946.

H. L. Yates, of Brownsville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*266DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or a statement of facts. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by tile Court.
#### OWENS v. OWENS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 1, 1951.

Francis D. Burke, Francis M. Burke, Pikeville, for appellant.

L. D. May, Pikeville, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Raymond and Geneva Owens were married in 1947. In March, 1949, Mrs. Owens sought a divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, and custody of the couple’s son, who was then one year of age. She asked also for $50 a month for the child’s support. In October, 1949, the parties filed an agreement in which Mrs. Owens waived all claim for alimony and support and agreed that her husband have custody of the child. In January, 1950, Mrs. Owens asked that the agreement be set aside. She also filed a second amended petition, charging abandonment as an additional ground for divorce. In March, the appellant filed an answer and counterclaim wherein he sought a divorce on the grounds of lewd and lascivious conduct on the part of his wife. He charged also that she was not a fit and proper person to have charge of the child. The chancellor awarded Mr. Owens a divorce on his answer and counterclaim and gave Mrs. Owens custody of the child.

The judgment presents a rather unusual situation. We are not prepared to say there was insufficient evidence to support the granting of a divorce to- the husband. Actually, Mrs. Owens may not have been guilty of immorality, but her conduct and her relations with at least two other men certainly laid her open to suspicion. We think it was error to award the custody of, the boy, who was approximately two years of age at the time of the entry of the judgment, to Mrs. Owens.

According to Mrs. Owens’ counsel, an entirely different situation is presented now. Mrs. Owens has remarried and has a comfortable home, and Mr. Owens is in the Army. Under those conditions it is highly probable that the chancellor would be warranted at this time in awarding the custody of the child to Mrs. Owens, if it be shown that she is a person of fit character and with suitable means to provide for its care..

That part of the judgment relating to the-custody of the child is reversed, with directions to set it aside, and for proceedings, consistent with this opinion.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gregory Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 30, 2013







/s/  "Gregory Anderson"

Gregory Anderson,

President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Solid Waste Services, Inc. d/b/a :

J. P. Mascaro & Sons and :

Inservco Insurance Services, Inc., :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 69 C.D. 2022

:

St. Luke’s Hospital (Bureau of :

Workers’ Compensation), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, June 20, 2023, upon consideration of Petitioners’

application for reargument, the application is DENIED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4680 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing Fluopyram and 

Trifloxystrobin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

Fluopyram and Trifloxystrobin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING FLUOPYRAM AND 

4 TRIFLOXYSTROBIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4680 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing N-{2- 

[3-Chloro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-2- 

pyridinyl]ethyl}- 

alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoroo-toluamide (Fluopyram) 

(CAS No. 658066–35–4) 

and Methyl (αE)-α- 

(methoxyimino)-2-[[[(E)- 

[1-[3- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]- 

ethylidene]amino]oxy]methyl]- 

benzeneacetate 

(Trifloxystrobin) (CAS No. 

141517–21–7), including 

application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 

3808.91.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS