alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
BARTLESVILLE, OKLAHOMA  74004   918 661-6600


                                                       Exhibit 5



                              September 18, 2001




Phillips Petroleum Company
Phillips Building
Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004

Dear Sirs:

     At your request I have examined Phillips Petroleum Company's
Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  1 on  Form  S-8  ("Post-Effective
Amendment")   to   the  Registration  Statement   on   Form   S-4
(Registration  No.  333-55932)  (the  "Registration  Statement"),
being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities  Act  of 1933, as amended (the "Securities  Act"),  in
connection  with  the  proposed  offering  of  an  aggregate   of
2,000,000  shares of common stock, $1.25 par value,  of  Phillips
Petroleum Company (the "Common Stock"), being offered and sold to
employees of Tosco Corporation and its subsidiaries from time  to
time   under   the   terms  of  the  Tosco  Corporation   Capital
Accumulation  Plan (the "Plan"), the form of which  is  filed  as
Exhibit 4 to the Post-Effective Amendment.

     In  connection  with  the foregoing,  I  have  examined  the
originals or copies, certified or otherwise authenticated  to  my
satisfaction,  of  such corporate records of  Phillips  Petroleum
Company   (the  "Company"),  agreements  and  other  instruments,
certificates of public officials and of officers of  the  Company
and other instruments and documents as I have deemed necessary to
require as a basis for the opinions hereinafter expressed.  As to
various  questions  of fact material to such  opinions,  I  have,
where  relevant facts were not independently established,  relied
upon statements of officers of the Company.

     On  the  basis  of the foregoing, I advise you  that  in  my
opinion  the  Common Stock, when sold pursuant to the  Plan,  has
been  duly authorized for issuance and, subject to the completion
of   the  filing  of  the  Post-Effective  Amendment  under   the
Securities  Act  and  to  compliance with  any  applicable  state
securities or Blue Sky laws, will be when sold under the terms of
the Plan legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

     I  hereby  consent  to the filing of this opinion  with  the
Securities  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit  to  the  Post-
Effective  Amendment.  In giving this consent, I do  not  thereby
admit that I come within the category of persons whose consent is
required  under Section 7 of the Securities Act or the  rules  or
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

                              Very truly yours,


                             /s/ Robert C. Koch


<PAGE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4460 

To extend the suspension of duty on Fenamidone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Fenamidone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENAMIDONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.38 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Fenamidone) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# OAR Box 1500 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 80)11-010 6 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/5/20081:51:30PM Sheet 80of 343 P. 1P. 2

^ > S T ^ . $ \

\ PB0l«- & UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK , N C 2771 1 

## A-^-5 2 U-C-10 6

DE C I 6 $9 8 AM I

M V

- '•} f*'

' ••'I t. / •J.-.J EP * ;.; R 'lOr.KF.T OFTIC E O F QUALITY PLANNIN G AN D STANDARD S Mr . Jac k Hanley Proces s Technologies , Inc . 831 5 Lanter

n Vie w Lan

e St . John , Indian a4637 3 Dea r Mr . Hanley : In ou r telephon e conversatio n o f

las t week , yo u aske dwhethe

r th e Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA) require s "proo f o f concept " verificatio n fo

r add-on contro l system s tha t hav e no t been use d in th e Unite d States , such a s th e concentrator system s w e haddiscussed . Th e EP A doe s no t

requir e contro l devic e supplier s t o certif y o r prov e adevice' s capability . However , when source s us e th e device s to compl y wit h a n EP A rul e (e.g. , anationa

l emissio n standard fo

r hazardou s air

pollutants) , th e sourc e generally mus t conduc t a n initia l performanc e tes t

(an di n som e cases , subsequen

t performanc e tests ) t o demonstrat e complianc e wit

h th e rule . Thi s tes t ma y consis t o f deterrniiiing th e contro l efficiency ofth e contro l syste mb y measurin g inle t

an d outlet pollutant concentration s ofth e contro l device , and , i f applicable , determinin g th e capture efficiency ofth e captur

e system . Th

e specific s regardin g tes t

method s an

dmonitorin g ar

e writte n i n th e rule . I n addition , source s usin g a n add-o n contro l devic e generall y nee dt o perfor

m continuou s monitorin g o f

emission s o

r asurrogat e paramete

r tha t serve s to indicat

e tha t th e sourc e i s achievin g continuou s complianc e wit h th e rule . The sourc e wouldals o nee dt o monito r th e captur e system . Yo

u ma y wan t to look ove r th e EPA' s Emissio n Measuremen t Center' s webpag e (www.epa.gov/ttn/emc ) which provide s informatio n o n monitoring andtes t methods . I di d want to brin g you

r attentio n to th e EPA' s Environmenta l Technolog y Verificatio n (ETV ) progra

m(websit e i s www.epa.gov/etv ) which ha s severa l pilo t project s t o verif

y th e environmenta

l performanc e characteristic s o f commercial-read

y technologies . Th e ET

V wa s create d t o substantially accelerat e th e entranc e o f

ne w environmenta

l technologie s into th e domesti c and internationa

l marketplace . Whil e new contro l method s .ar e no t require dt o b e verifie d b y th e ETV , you ma y b e intereste di n learnin g mor e abou t th e program . I hop e thi s information wil l b e helpful to you . Pleas e contac t m e i f you requir

e additional information . Sincerely ,



# -i\<M-

V*JL^- Madelein e Stru

m Environmenta

l Enginee r Coating s andConsume

r Product s Grou

p Interne t Addres s (URL ) • http://www.epa.430 v Recycled/Recyclabl e • Printe d wit h Vegetabl e Oi l Base d Ink s o n Recycle d Pape r (Minimu m 25 % Postconsumer ) 

### ~i
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File) 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                           
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Idaho Extraction Loss of Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Idaho Extraction Loss of Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 48     | 237    | 146    | 114    | 47    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 19     | 52     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit 12.1

Southwestern Electric Power Company
Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For the Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2001 and Years Ended December 31

                                    Twelve Months
                                        Ended
                   September 30, 2001    2000      1999      1998      1997      1996
                                         (thousands, except ratios)

<S>                         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Operating Income            $135,887  $128,278  $147,062  $150,678  $139,473  $134,117
Adjustments
  Income Taxes                36,566    14,597    55,343    62,595    44,396    32,931
  Provision for
    Deferred Income
      Taxes                    1,218    14,653   (17,347)  (11,909)   (2,209)      714
Deferred Investment
      Tax Credits             (4,442)   (4,482)   (4,565)   (4,631)   (4,662)   (4,730)
Changes for Investments and
  Plant Development Costs,
  Net of Tax                    -         -         -         -         (483)  (21,815)
Other Income and Deductions    2,680     3,405    (2,000)    1,115     3,578       312
Allowance for Borrowed and
  Equity Funds Used During
  Construction                 2,934     3,372     1,984     2,687     2,156     2,423
  Interest Portion of
    Financing Leases            -         -          335       598     1,194     1,514
    Earnings                $174,843  $159,823  $180,812  $201,133  $183,443  $145,466

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on
   Long-term Debt            $42,813   $43,547   $38,380   $39,233   $40,440   $44,066
  Interest on
   Short-term Debt             8,264    10,174    13,800     8,591     5,736     8,381
  Distributions on Trust
   Preferred Securities        8,663     8,663     8,662     8,662     5,582      -
  Interest Portion of
   Financing leases             -         -          335       598     1,194     1,514
    Fixed Charges            $59,740   $62,384   $61,177   $57,084   $52,952   $53,961

Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges                 2.92      2.56      2.95      3.52      3.46      2.69
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), J. Stephen Vanderwoude, as Managing Director, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
-----------------------------------------------

Name:    J. Stephen Vanderwoude
Title:   Managing Director, Chairman
          and Chief Executive Officer
Date:    August 16, 2004




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS, Inc.,
CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-11;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 24, 2006


                                                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                                                  ----------------
                                                  Steve Bailey
                                                  Senior Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FEBRUARY
25, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-2000             AUG-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-25-2000             FEB-25-2000
<CASH>                                            1201                    1201
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21765                   21765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306                     306
<INVENTORY>                                      20987                   20987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 44558                   44558
<PP&E>                                          159946                  159946
<DEPRECIATION>                                   84095                   84095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  121260                  121260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            21602                   21602
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         42                      42
<COMMON>                                          2924                    2924
<OTHER-SE>                                       60303                   60303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    121260                  121260
<SALES>                                          66842                   32030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 66842                   32030
<CGS>                                            57993                   27937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10039                    4797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1806                     890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2996                    1594
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2996                    1594
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2996                    1594
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .35                     .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35                     .18


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0607

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SETH ANDREW KELLER-KEITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 3 2023

05/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0607
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60142

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NANCY C. MEDLIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:01-CV-656-WS

USDC No. 3:98-CR-70-ALL-WS

--------------------

November 27, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nancy C. Medlin filed a FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4)-denominated

motion in the district court. Medlin contended that the district

court’s imposition of restitution as a condition of her

supervised release, imposed following her 1999 conviction for

filing a materially false tax return in 1991, was void. The

district court acknowledged that Medlin’s motion could be

considered a successive 28 U.S.C, § 2255 motion, but it denied
No. 02-60142

-2-

the motion on its merits. The district court subsequently denied

a certificate of appealability (COA). 

Medlin argues that her motion cannot be construed as a

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. She submits that she is permitted to

utilize Rule 60(b)(4) to attack the order of restitution. Medlin

requests that the requirement that she file for a COA be waived. 

She also contends that if Rule 60(b)(4) relief is not available,

she is entitled to utilize the writ of audita querela.

This court is obligated to determine jurisdiction even where

the parties do not challenge it. See United States v. Hatten,

167 F.3d 884, 886 (5th Cir. 1999). In Hatten, this court

determined that the district court lacked jurisdiction to issue

an order modifying a restitution order on the grounds of

illegality under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663(g) and 3583(e)(2), 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255, a writ of coram nobis, or “under any other federal law.” 

Id. at 886-87 & n.6. “[R]estitution, in general, is a sentencing

issue that should be raised on direct appeal.” Id. at 887 n.5.

Consistent with Hatten, we conclude that the district court

was without jurisdiction to consider Medlin’s legal challenge to

her order of restitution under Rule 60(b)(4) or via a writ of

audita querela. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s

judgment and REMAND WITH INSTRUCTIONS to dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction. Medlin’s request to waive the COA requirement is

DENIED as moot.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   May 10, 2011 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell                                |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | **Gregory A. Shortell*****Chief Executive   Officer*** |

 

----
Exhibit 11



SHELDAHL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(in thousands, except per share data)



	For The Three Months Ended

					November 29,	December 1,
					1996		1995

Primary earnings per share

Weighted average number of issued 
   shares outstanding			8,913		6,994

Effect of exercise of stock options
   under the treasury stock method	    -	  	  263
					______		______

Weighted average shares outstanding 
   used to compute primary earnings 
   per share				8,913		7,257
					======		======

Net income				$(1,733)	$  858
					======		======

Net income per share			$(0.19)		$ 0.12
					======		======

Fully diluted earnings per share

Weighted average number of issued 
   shares outstanding			8,913		6,994

Effect of exercise of stock options
   under the treasury stock method	    -	  	  285
					______		______

Weighted average shares outstanding 
   used to compute fully diluted 
   earnings per share			8,913		7,279
					======		======

Net income				$(1,733)	$  858
					======		======

Net income per share			$ (0.19)	$ 0.12
					======		======
<PAGE>