Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 1 of 2 

SUMMARY

(In accordance with 40 CFR part 152, this summary is available 

for public release after registration) 

STUDY TITLE

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos 

DATA REQUIREMENTS

NA 

AUTHOR(S)

C. B. Cleveland 

STUDY COMPLETED ON

5-NOV-2010 

PERFORMING LABORATORY

Regulatory Laboratories—Indianapolis Lab 

Dow AgroSciences LLC 

9330 Zionsville Road 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-1054 

LABORATORY STUDY ID

101760 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 2 of 2 

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos 

SUMMARY

The acute dietary assessment for chlorpyrifos has been updated in 2010. This assessment is a 

reflection of continuing changes in the chlorpyrifos use patterns and the recently approved EPA 

tolerance revisions in the context of guidance for higher tiered dietary exposure assessments. 

When possible, this assessment uses monitoring data which is available primarily from USDA 

PDP (2003 to 2008) and also from USFDA for a few key commodities. Percent crop treated 

(PCT) is a key refinement factor in this type of higher tier assessment; the newest EPA SLUA 

was slightly adjusted using additional available data on percent crop treated, when appropriate. 

Recently implemented US use pattern changes resulting from reregistration have reduced 

domestic residue contributions for several highly consumed crops. A parsing of the remaining 

dietary exposure between imports and domestic observations has been conducted for several key 

crops. 

Estimated acute dietary exposure was assessed against the existing acute Population Adjusted 

Dose (aPAD) for all subpopulations established by EPA during reregistration. Currently, for the 

general population the aPAD is 0.005 mg/kg/day. For children and females of child-bearing 

years, the aPAD has an additional FQPA 10X uncertainty factor and is 0.0005 mg/kg/day. The 

estimated acute dietary exposure does not exceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of the 

acute population adjusted dose] for the general US population and relevant population subgroups 

at the 99.9 th percentile of exposure. (Estimated exposures are substantially less at the 95th

percentile.) The estimated acute dietary exposure for the general U.S. population at the 99.9 th

percentile exposure was 0.000169 mg/kg/day, or 3.4% aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the 

population subgroup with the highest estimated dietary exposure, the value was 0.000273 

mg/kg/day, or 54.6% aPAD. In conclusion, acute dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos is not of 

concern for the general US population and relevant subgroups (including the most highly 

exposed population sub-group, children 1-2 years old) at the 99.9 th percentile of exposure. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 1 of 140 

STUDY TITLE

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos 

DATA REQUIREMENTS

NA 

AUTHOR(S)

C. B. Cleveland 317 337 3532 

[cbcleveland@dow.com] 

STUDY COMPLETED ON

5-NOV-2010 

PERFORMING LABORATORY

Regulatory Laboratories—Indianapolis Lab 

Dow AgroSciences LLC 

9330 Zionsville Road 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-1054 

LABORATORY STUDY ID

101760 


Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 4 

QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT 

Compound: Chlorpyrifos 

Title: 2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos 

Study Initiation Date: 01-FEB-2009 Study Completion Date: 5-NOV-2010 

NON-GLP STUDY 

Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 6 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page

ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................10 

INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................12 

Non-Crop Uses ..........................................................................................................................13 

Model and Methods ...................................................................................................................13 

Tiered Assessment Approach ....................................................................................................14 

Endpoints for Dietary.................................................................................................................14 

RESIDUE DATA AND AVAILABLE DISTRIBUTIONS..........................................................15 

USDA PDP Data........................................................................................................................15 

FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program ....................................................................................16 

REFINED EXPOSURE BY COMMODITY ................................................................................18 

Methods for <LOD and Market Share.......................................................................................18 

Baby Food..................................................................................................................................19 

Imported vs. Domestic Foods ....................................................................................................19 

Non-included Commodities.......................................................................................................20 

Restricted Use Pattern for Pome, Stone and Grapes..................................................................20 

Apple and Pear......................................................................................................................20 

Stone Fruits...........................................................................................................................21 

Grape.....................................................................................................................................21 

Commodity Point Estimates and RDF Files..............................................................................22 

Apples ...................................................................................................................................22 

Apple Juice ...........................................................................................................................23 

Apple Sauce ..........................................................................................................................23 

Asparagus..............................................................................................................................24 

Asparagus canned .................................................................................................................24 

Banana ..................................................................................................................................24 

Beans: Green Beans..............................................................................................................25 

Beans: Group 6C, Dried Shelled Bean/Peas (Excluding Soybean)......................................25 

Beans: Other Peas and Beans for Group 6A and 6B ............................................................26 

Beef and Other Meats except Pork .......................................................................................26 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 7 

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 

Page

Beet, sugar ............................................................................................................................27 

Broccoli.................................................................................................................................27 

Brussels sprouts ....................................................................................................................27 

Cabbage ................................................................................................................................28 

Chinese cabbage ...................................................................................................................28 

Cauliflower ...........................................................................................................................28 

Cherry ...................................................................................................................................29 

Citrus Other: Fruits and Juices..............................................................................................29

Collards and Turnip Greens..................................................................................................29 

Corn ......................................................................................................................................30 

Corn: Sweet Corn..................................................................................................................31 

Cottonseed Oil ......................................................................................................................31 

Cranberries............................................................................................................................32 

Cucumber and Pumpkin and Other Squash ..........................................................................32 

Fig .........................................................................................................................................32 

Grapes ...................................................................................................................................33 

Grape Juice ...........................................................................................................................33 

Grape: Raisin ........................................................................................................................33 

Grapefruit and Grapefruit juice.............................................................................................34 

Kale and Other Greens within Group 5B..............................................................................34 

Kiwifruit- from Historical FDA Data ...................................................................................35 

Lemons and Limes................................................................................................................35 

Lemon Juice (and lime juice)................................................................................................35 

Lettuce ..................................................................................................................................35 

Milk.......................................................................................................................................36 

Mint and Mint Oils ...............................................................................................................36 

Onion ....................................................................................................................................36 

Orange...................................................................................................................................37 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 8 

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 

Page

Orange Juice .........................................................................................................................37 

Peaches..................................................................................................................................38 

Nectarines .............................................................................................................................38 

Peaches, canned ....................................................................................................................39 

Peanuts –FDA data ...............................................................................................................39 

Peanut Butter.........................................................................................................................39 

Pears and Pear Juice..............................................................................................................40 

Peppers..................................................................................................................................40 

Plums and Prunes..................................................................................................................41 

Pork Fat.................................................................................................................................41 

Pork Meat..............................................................................................................................42 

Poultry Meat .........................................................................................................................42 

Poultry Fat.............................................................................................................................42 

Poultry Eggs..........................................................................................................................43 

Radish ...................................................................................................................................43 

Sorghum................................................................................................................................43 

Soybeans ...............................................................................................................................43 

Strawberry.............................................................................................................................44 

Sunflower..............................................................................................................................44 

Sweet Potato .........................................................................................................................45 

Tree Nuts...............................................................................................................................45 

Turnip and Rutabagas ...........................................................................................................45 

Drinking Water – PDP and NAQWA Data ..........................................................................46 

Wheat....................................................................................................................................46 

ACUTE DIETARY ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................47 

Summary Table: Calculations (per Capita) from DEEM Acute Assessment............................48 

Commodity Contributions .........................................................................................................48 

REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................50 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 9 

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 

Page

Table 1. Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA .............................56 

Table 2. Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with Tolerances.........58 

Table 3. Relevant Commodities with Significant Import Contributions to Overall 

Detections in PDP Data..............................................................................................61 

Table 4. Label Use Restrictions Applicable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from Lorsban®

Advanced Insecticide Label .......................................................................................62 

Table 5. Summary of RDF Data File Construction..................................................................64 

Appendix A: DATA to Support Percentage of Imported Commodities Consumed by 

US Population.............................................................................................................76 

Appendix B: RDF Residue files prepared for DEEM .............................................................82 

Appendix C: DEEM Residue FILE INPUT ..........................................................................113 

Appendix D: Summary of Residue Distribution Files...........................................................128 

Appendix E: DEEM Analysis FILE OUTPUT .....................................................................132 

Appendix F: Key Output from DEEM Critical Commodity Analysis File...........................135 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 10 

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos 

ABSTRACT 

The acute dietary assessment for chlorpyrifos has been updated in 2010. The assessment is a 

reflection of several changes in chlorpyrifos use patterns which occurred as a result of EPA 

reregistration (i.e., 2001 draft IRED, 2006 RED) and were designed to reduce dietary exposure. 

This assessment builds on the comprehensive listing of tolerances announced by EPA via the 

CFR Final Rule in 2008, relies on the previous DAS assessment of February 2008, and includes 

new monitoring data through 2008 as posted by USDA in late 2009. USFDA monitoring data 

for a few commodities has also been incorporated. Minor shifts in overall percent crop treated 

(PCT) have occurred in the market; the newest EPA Screening Level Usage Assessment (SLUA) 

was slightly adjusted using internal data on percent crop treated, when appropriate. US use 

pattern changes have resulted in reduced domestic residue contribution for several highly 

consumed crops. A parsing of the remaining dietary exposure between imports and domestic 

observations has been conducted for several key crops. This dietary assessment was conducted 

using the recent DEEM software version 2.16. Over 70 individual residue files (RDF) were used 

in the assessment; most were created from the newer monitoring data; a very few were reused 

from the reregistration-era assessment conducted by EPA in 2000. Decisions for the inclusion or 

exclusion of specific information reflect general guidance for a higher tiered regulatory exposure 

assessment. 

Resulting exposure was assessed against the existing acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) for 

all subpopulations as established by EPA during reregistration. For the general population the 

aPAD is 0.005 mg/kg/day. For children and females of child-bearing years the aPAD has an 

additional FQPA 10X factor and is 0.0005 mg/kg/day. A summary of the key information per 

capita for the 99.9th percentile is summarized in the following table: 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 11 

Population Exposure 

(mg/kg/day) 

% aPAD 

@99.9 th 

%ile 

MOE 

(relative to 

NOEL) 

U.S. Population 0.000169 3.39 2952 

All infants 0.000211 42.14 2373 

Nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000143 28.69 3486 

Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000212 42.44 2356 

Children 1-6 yrs 0.000253 50.63 1975 

Children 7-12 yrs 0.000157 31.41 3183 

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.000185 36.96 2705 

Females 13-50 yrs 0.000135 26.94 3711 

Males 20+ yrs 0.000154 3.08 3247 

Seniors 55+ 0.000166 3.31 3017 

Children 1-2 yrs 0.000273 54.62 1830 

Children 3-5 yrs 0.000225 44.95 2224 

Children 6-12 yrs 0.000159 31.71 3153 

Females 13-49 yrs 0.000134 26.84 3726 

The estimated acute dietary exposure does not exceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of 

the acute population adjusted dose] for the general US population and relevant population 

subgroups at the 99.9 th percentile of exposure. (Estimated exposures are substantially less at the 

95th percentile.) The estimated dietary exposure for the general U.S. population at the 99.9th

percentile exposure was 0.000169 mg/kg/day, or 3.4% aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the 

most highly exposed population subgroup, dietary exposure was 0.000273 mg/kg/day, or 54.6% 

aPAD. In conclusion, acute dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos is not of concern for the general US 

population and relevant subgroups (including the most highly exposed population sub-group, 

children 1-2 years old) at the 99.9 th percentile of exposure. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 12 

INTRODUCTION 

Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)-phosphorothioate, CAS number 

2921-88-2), is an organophosphate insecticide which had several changes to its use patterns 

as a result of the EPA reregistration (1)and reregistration-related tolerance revisions recently 

promulgated (2). The general approach used in this report follows the EPA posted policies 

 (3, 4, 5, 6); detailed methodology follows the implementation used in other EPA assessments 

 (7 ,8, 9) and many of the original approaches from the EPA reregistration-era acute assessment 

(10). Market share information (11) and an understanding of domestic consumption of imports 

for key crops are both key refinements to the dietary assessment. Decisions for the inclusion or 

exclusion of specific information reflect general guidance for a higher tiered regulatory exposure 

assessment. 

As a result of reregistration, during 2008, EPA revised the comprehensive listing of over 80 

tolerances for chlorpyrifos resulting from re-registration for food, feed and certain crop groups 

(2) to include revocation of tolerances on tomatoes, and reduction of apple and grape tolerances 

to 0.01 ppm. Most US growers had already adopted practices which resulted in lower residue 

values for these crops in the preceding years. The commodities included in the 2008 revised set 

of tolerances become the starting point for this assessment which is conducted using the Dietary 

Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM) software (12). For processing factors, the assessment 

started with defaults from within DEEM (13), but several were refined as appropriate by 

processing and cooking factors used previously by EPA for chlorpyrifos (10). For this 2010 

report, the updated EPA Screening Level Usage Assessment (SLUA) (14) is assessed alongside 

the detailed market share report by Gomez which DAS posted to the registration review docket 

for chlorpyrifos (11). Thus this refined dietary risk assessment for chlorpyrifos is updated to 

reflect changes implemented since the EPA IRED which includes: 1) tolerance changes, 

2) updated residue monitoring information and 3) changes in market use patterns since 2001. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 13 

In the US, Dow AgroSciences markets chlorpyrifos under the trademark of Lorsban® insecticide. 

Non-Crop Uses

Most residential uses of chlorpyrifos were phased out between 2000 and 2001. Moreover, DAS 

now supports only food and feed crop uses; DAS no longer supports uses involving golf course 

turf, greenhouses, non-structural wood treatments (such as utility poles and fence posts), ant bait 

stations, and adult mosquitocides (15). Several label changes have been made over the last 

decade and were completed by 2005 which have reduced the maximum use rate in several of the 

crop use patterns (11,16). 

Model and Methods

DEEM-FCID version 2.16 is used (12). This model from Exponent/Novigen is based on the 

food consumption data collected in the USDA’s Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by 

Individuals (CSFII) collected from 1994-96 and 1998 (94-96, 98). As a starting point, the 

DEEM 2000 Appendix D processing factors were used as defaults and then refined as applicable 

for chlorpyrifos. The highly refined assessments from the EPA 2000 acute assessment were the 

foundation for this update which uses the most recent government monitoring as the primary 

sources of residue data: USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) data (2003to 2008). 

Percent Crop Treated (PCT) is an important parameter in a refined Tier III/IV assessment. In an 

acute assessment, the focus is on the maximum PCT. The quantitative QUA from the 2001 

IRED is now outdated. For preliminary assessment, EPA has produced a 2008 SLUA (Screening 

Level Usage Assessment) (14). In several instances, this screening level information can be 

informed by more precise data on actual lbs used per DAS Gomez 2009 report (11). Table 1 

includes a conservative refinement by crop for the associated maximum PCT based on a scaling 

 

® Trademark of Dow AgroSciences, LLC 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 14 

of lbs used. Approximately one third of the EPA SLUA values were adjusted upwards and 

approximately one third downward making this data more appropriate for a refined dietary 

assessment. It is noted this appears to be conservative and in some cases may be overestimating 

the adjusted maximum PCT, because it is based on a total lbs comparison instead of a deeper 

review of the treated acreage (which can include multiple applications in a season). In general, 

when no use was listed, a default assumption of 1% crop treated estimate is applied. An EPA 

QUA analysis is still needed for a final refinement of PCT. It is also noted that the following 

crops, considered in EPA’s SLUA, do not have chlorpyrifos approved U.S. uses (11): apricots, 

artichoke, avocado, cantaloupes, carrots, chicory, lettuce (tolerance but no U.S. use), olives, 

pistachios, potatoes, seed crops, spinach, squash, tomatoes, and watermelons. 

Tiered Assessment Approach

Dietary Assessments are typically classed in a tiered approach according to the amount of 

refinement (17). A Tier III assessment utilizes the entire field trial residue distribution for single 

serving foods and the mean field trial or 95th percentile from monitoring data for 

processed/blended commodities and information on percent crop treated (PCT). Tier IV uses 

entire residue distributions from statistically designed market surveys. The assessment within 

this report is a combination of Tier III/IV assessment which uses distribution information as well 

as point information as appropriate and also incorporates processing factors and cooking data. 

This is therefore an update to the similar Tier III/IV approach finalized by EPA in 2000. 

Endpoints for Dietary 

Endpoints based on cholinesterase inhibition and established by EPA as part of chlorpyrifos 

reregistration (1) were used in this assessment. They are summarized as: 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 15 

Exposure 

Scenario NOAEL and Factors RfD and PAD 

Acute Dietary NOAEL=0.5 mg/kg/day 

UF = 100 

FQPA = 10 (infants, children and 

females 13-50)

Acute RfD =0.005 mg/kg/day 

Acute PAD (children and females 13-50) = 0.0005 or 

5x10-4 mg/kg/day 

Acute PAD (general population) = 0.005 or 5x10-3 

mg/kg/day

Chronic Dietary NOAEL= 0.03 mg/kg/day 

UF= 100 

FQPA = 10 (infants, children and 

females 13-50)

Chronic RfD =0.0003 mg/kg/day 

Chronic PAD (children and females 13-50) = 0.00003 or 

3x10-5 mg/kg/day 

Chronic PAD (general population) = 0.0003 or 3x10-4

mg/kg/day

NOAEL = No Observed Adverse Effect Level; UF = Uncertainty Factor; RfD = Reference Dose; PAD = Population 

Adjusted Dose (includes UF and FQPA safety factor) 

The above endpoints do not yet reflect availability of more recent data from the chlorpyrifos 

comparative chlolinesterase assay study completed in 2010 as part of the Registration Review 

process (18). This new study specifically evaluated age-dependent differences in cholinesterase 

inhibition, and the results have direct implications for reevaluation of both the POD and selection 

of the appropriate FQPA uncertainty factor for use in risk assessment (19). 

RESIDUE DATA AND AVAILABLE DISTRIBUTIONS 

Several sources of residue information have been used or reviewed in this update. If data existed 

in multiple residue information sources, the hierarchy of preferred use was as follows: USDA 

PDP > FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program > DAS Field Trial Data> Tolerance. This 

hierarchy prioritizes data to most appropriately approximate a “dinner plate” residue scenario 

whenever possible. 

USDA PDP Data

Publicly available data from the USDA PDP monitoring program (20) has been downloaded and 

organized into an ACCESS database for use within Dow AgroSciences. The USDA PDP data is 

specifically applicable for dietary risk assessment because samples are prepared in a manner 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 16 

similar to typical consumer practices, such as washing or peeling. Also samples are obtained at 

distribution centers that supply grocery stores, making these samples close to the consumer in the 

food chain. The most recent available USDA PDP data sets for over 70 monitored commodities 

in 70,000 samples have been organized in a summary table (Table 2). The average limit of 

detection (LOD) value is reported for each data set. Note for beef adipose, beef liver and beef 

muscle that data from 2002 were used, because there was no newer data for these items. 

Monitoring data for commodities with no established tolerance (2) are not listed in Table 2 (e. g. 

blueberries, spinach etc.) as per general guidance that regulatory exposure assessments typically 

do not include any noncompliant residues. 

Per Table 2, no detectable residues were noted for over 1/3 of the commodities within the PDP 

data set: apple sauce, apple juice, cherries, beef adipose, beef liver, beef muscle, grape juice, 

canned green beans, canned peaches, frozen sweet peas, sweet corn, frozen sweet corn, peanut 

butter, potatoes and frozen potatoes, wheat flour, milk, heavy cream, onions, prunes, pork 

muscle, poultry, pear juice, four types of water and watermelon. Only 11 data sets had detection 

rates above 5%. Very low detection rates of <1% to 5% were observed in the remainder of the 

other sample sets. The recent PDP data information on water is congruent with historical 

drinking water monitoring data which shows negligible detectable residues in finished drinking 

water supplies (21, 22, 23). 

FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program

To provide information on cabbage, kiwi and peanuts not covered by USDA PDP, FDA data was 

used. FDA data is collected primarily for tolerance enforcement purposes and samples are not 

typically washed or peeled. The collection points for FDA samples are across the channels of 

commerce and are intended to be closer to the farm gate rather than the dinner plate. The 

published FDA monitoring data (24) from years 2004 to 2007 has been reviewed for this updated 

assessment. During the preparation of this data set in the summer/fall of 2010, the public 

downloads of the FDA data from 2004 to 2006 are noted as temporarily unavailable (24); data 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 17 

for a subset of commodities was requested and obtained from Ronald Roy (25). For peanuts and 

kiwi historical FDA data was ultimately used. 

For 2007, residue data sets were prepared using the downloaded FDA Surveillance monitoring 

SMPL2007.TXT file (26); this file is analytical data for each individual sample, as entered by 

FDA field chemists. Information on multiple pesticides is contained within this file, so the data 

was filtered to gain data associated with “Chlorpyrifos” or “No residue found”; all other entries 

were discarded. Because the file contains analysis for multiple pesticides and there is no single 

method which covers all pesticides, it can not be assumed that the “no residue found” results 

automatically applies to chlorpyrifos. To determine if chlorpyrifos was covered when "NO 

RESIDUE FOUND" is reported, information within the fields named ExtCode (extraction 

methods) and DetCode (detection methods) was used (27). The codes from these two fields were 

compared to the values associated with CHLORPYRIFOS or the NO DECTECTIONS in the 

corresponding methods file (eg METH2003.TXT) which lists how each pesticide is covered by 

the particular analytical methods used by FDA. Rows of data associated with methods which 

were not associated with chlorpyrifos were discarded. Due to the unspecified nature of the “999” 

extraction and “99” detection codes, there were some values of “no residue found” that could not 

be definitively associated or disassociated with chlorpyrifos. To remain conservative, these data 

rows were not included in the count of no detections. Finally the file was culled for duplicate 

sample numbers to ensure only one sample was included in final counts for distribution. 

Because the primary purpose of the FDA analyses is enforcement, information on LOD or LOQ 

(limit of quantitation) values is not posted directly with the observations. Additionally, for a 

given commodity, FDA data may be limited for any given year; as such, results are combined for 

all years. In 2000, EPA used an estimate of 1⁄2 LOD = 0.00015 ppm and 1⁄2 LOQ = 0.0005 ppm 

for chlorpyrifos in all commodities for all samples analyzed by the FDA Surveillance Monitoring 

program; these were based on a memorandum by S. Hummel, 2/26/99, “LOQs for FDA 

Monitoring Data” (10). However this appears too low based on general information on the 

LOQs associated with the FDA Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM) methods found in Section 

105 of the PAM manual (28). Those posted LOQs are typically 0.015 ppm, which leads to a 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 18 

general LOD of 0.005 ppm and 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025 ppm. For this updated assessment, the 

following 1⁄2 LOD values will be used for FDA data. For 302 and 303 methods a 1⁄2 LOD = 

0.0025 ppm will be used. For 304 methods, the LOQ posted is 0.03 which leads to a 1⁄2 LOD = 

0.005ppm. 

REFINED EXPOSURE BY COMMODITY 

Methods for <LOD and Market Share

For the field trial and DAS generated data, the ND (non detects) below the LOD will be set to 

1⁄2 of the LOD (for the method). The appropriate number of zeros will be added to represent the 

percentage of expected non-treated samples based on the market share estimates (PCT). 

In the governmental monitoring data sets for non-blended and partially blended commodities (3), 

the number of reported <LOD values which are set to 1⁄2 LOD will be determined by the percent 

crop treated by solving for x: 

(# detectable residue + x)/ (total number of samples) = PCT (as a decimal) 

The remainder of the values will be set to zero: 

Number zero = total number samples - # detectable - # set at 1⁄2 LOQ 

Any values reported as < LOQ or Trace will be set at 1⁄2 LOQ. 

To use monitored distributions of blended commodities, none of the ND values are set to zero 

based on market share; instead the 1⁄2 LOD value is incorporated for all. Often it is preferable to 

use the average of the crop field trial and then adjust this by multiplying by the PCT. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 19 

When appropriate for import residues, the PCT may be adjusted to reflect either key treated 

imports or non-treatment of imports. 

When multiple LODs are reported within a data set, the weighted average of the LODs from 

treated commodities in which no residues are detected (5) is calculated as implied by Table 1B of 

the methomyl assessment (9). 

Baby Food

Based on an aldicarb example (8), “babyfoods” in DEEM were typically treated exactly like their 

non-baby food counterpart, i.e. used the same PCT, distribution files or residue information and 

the same processing or cooking factors. This assessment of baby food likely overestimates 

exposure, because baby foods are more highly processed (with more opportunity for loss of 

residues) and baby food companies often have established low residue policies for growers who 

produce commodities for use in baby foods. 

Imported vs. Domestic Foods

The PDP data in Table 2 was reviewed for residue contributions from imported versus 

domestically grown produce. For several commodities, the majority of the summed detectable 

residue in PDP arises from imported samples. For example in the 2007 nectarine data set 

(563 total observations), the rate of observable residues in the domestic samples was 2% (6 out 

of 347) but for imported samples the observation rate of detectable residues was 39% (83 out of 

212). Similarly for peaches, the rate of detectable residues in the domestic samples was 4% but 

46% for imports. Table 3 summarizes the PDP data sets with significant import percentages. 

Table 3 also includes values for the percentage of import/domestic production. These values 

were derived from queries of the USDA FAO PSD online database (29) and USDA’s ERS 

service data (30,31) as summarized in Appendix A as well as commodity web searches (32). 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 20 

In each case, the PDP data set for the imports is greater than 100 samples and thus large enough 

to separate into a domestic residue distribution and an import residue distribution which is then 

weighted by the percent of import consumption by the US population. 

Non-included Commodities

Decisions for the inclusion or exclusions of specific information reflect general guidance for a 

higher tiered regulatory exposure assessment. For example, there is no tolerance established for 

blueberries but the 2007 - 2008 PDP data found a 1% detection rate of low level residue. These 

values are not included in the dietary DEEM file, because they represent noncompliant imports. 

Similarly, the low level detections in spinach (3%) and tomatoes (<3%) as well as the residues in 

imported catfish are not associated with approved uses or tolerance and were not included in this 

regulatory assessment. 

Restricted Use Pattern for Pome, Stone and Grapes

The majority of the crops in Table 3 have use patterns in US domestic production designed to 

minimize residues, such as dormant and trunk only treatments for pome and stone fruit, dormant 

and post-harvest vine-only treatments for grapes and a revoked tolerance with no approved use 

for tomatoes. See Table 4 for a specific list of label statements. 

Apple and Pear 

Applications to apples are restricted to a single annual application, either as a pre-bloom 

dormant/delayed dormant spray to the canopy or the trunk, or a post-bloom application to the 

lower 4 feet of the trunk. Confirmation of the low residues from this domestic use patterns is 

provided by an IR-4 Apple MOR study in 2003 (33). Six apple trials were conducted across five 

states. In this study, each treated plot received two trunk-directed applications of test substance 

with 1.5 qt of Lorsban® 4E insecticide/100 gal spray with PHI of 28 to 30 days. (The study was 

conducted under broader conditions than the current label which is restricted to only a single 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 21 

application up to 4 pts/acre) No residues above the reported Lowest Level of Method Validation 

(LLMV) of 0.01 ppm were observed in any of the samples. This limited use pattern was an 

outcome of the IRED (1) and is designed to significantly reduce the residue exposure in apples; it 

is supported by the 2008 EPA action to lower the apple tolerance to 0.01 ppm (2). 

Stone Fruits 

Uses in peaches and nectarines are restricted to either: predip/preplant or dormant/delayed 

dormant spray to the canopy or a post-bloom application to the lower 4 feet of the trunk. They 

are restricted to a single application annually. 

Cherries are similarly restricted to predip/preplant or dormant/delayed dormant spray to the 

canopy or a post-bloom application to the lower 4 feet of the trunk. There is the ability to apply 

thrice annually in cherries. 

Plum and prune uses are restricted to dormant/delayed dormant spray only. There is no approved 

use in apricots or other stone fruits. 

Grape 

Per Table 4, grape usage is restricted to pre-bloom, dormant/delayed dormant, or soil surface 

applications in certain geographic regions; no foliar sprays are allowed. These use limitations 

are understood to limit the residue potential in grapes and is supported by the 2008 EPA action to 

reduce the grape tolerance to 0.01 ppm (2). With that 2008 action, it is now incumbent upon 

exporting regions to the US to comply with the imposed tolerance. DAS has confirmed that for 

export, Chilean growers have changed their application patterns for chlorpyrifos in table grapes; 

they apply only till flowering and have residue monitoring programs in place prior to export to 

ensure compliance with the US standard (34). 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 22 

Commodity Point Estimates and RDF Files

Over 70 RDF files built primarily from PDP information were used for this assessment within 

the DEEM acute procedures. Point estimates for average residues were also used for several 

blended commodities. The details for data parsing for each commodity follows and are also 

summarized in Table 5. The RDF files are found in Appendix B. 

Apples 

Apples are a highly consumed commodity that greatly impact the exposure estimates for 

children. An apple RDF file for use in the DEEM acute procedures has been built based on 

available PDP data and PCT information. A significant change to the apple use pattern occurred 

as a result of the 2000 IRED (1). Post-bloom foliar applications to apples were discontinued (35) 

and the tolerance on apples was lowered to 0.01 ppm (2) as supported by the IR-4 apple MOR 

study for trunk applications (33). PDP data for 2004 and 2005 is available and it includes 17 

observed residues and 1487 observations of no detections at LODs of either 0.004 or 0.0012 ppm 

at an average weighted LOD of 0.002012 ppm. However, it is also noted that the existing data 

contains two import detections in 2004 and 2005 that are now over the 2008 imposed tolerance 

level of 0.01 ppm. For this updated 2010 assessment those two observations have been 

conservatively used although it could be more appropriate to truncate those observations to the 

legal limit of 0.01 ppm. The EPA 2008 SLUA (14) estimates a maximum of 65% crop treated 

for domestic apples, however Table 1 indicates a more realistic value is 67% (11). From all this 

information, the apple RDF#7 file is constructed with 17 observations, 496 true zeros and 991 

entries at 1⁄2 the average weighted LOD of 0.001006 ppm. 

RDF#7 is applicable for the DEEM entries of Apple, fruit with peel. RDF#7 is also used for

Apple, peeled fruit (for all but the “canned” food form) along with a processing factor of 0.15X 

for peeling which was documented and used for several commodities in EPA’s 2000 assessment 

(10). Per the 2000 chlorpyrifos assessment, the canned apple food forms Apple, fruit with peel

and Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood are more similar to apple sauce; see below. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 23 

Dried apples were treated as a “blended” commodity per the methomyl assessment (9). Based on 

the data within RDF#7 the point estimate becomes (0.0932 + (991*0.0001006))/1504 = 0.000128 

ppm. The point estimate was applied to Apple, dried, and Apple, dried-babyfood foods in 

DEEM along with the default processing factors of 8X for drying and 0.15X for peeling (10). 

Apple Juice 

In 2002, PDP data indicated no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos were present in apple juice 

even prior to the apple use pattern change. Current PDP data from 2007 and 2008 have 

reconfirmed the lack of detectable residues in juice. Based on a value of 67 PCT (Table 1), the 

368 non-detected levels in juice at an average LOD of 0.006272 ppm were parsed as 121 true 

zeros and 247 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.00313 ppm for the PDP in RDF#8. This file was initially

applied to Apple, juice and Apple, juice-babyfood in DEEM. However, children diets are highly 

affected by the consumption of apple juice. In this refined assessment the exposure to children 

was dominated by the 1⁄2 LOD. Hence, for this assessment the RDF#7 on apples with the 0.3X 

juice factor observed in grapes and translated to apple juice commodities. A processing study 

conducted in Europe suggests the 0.3X is conservative as an apple juice processing factor; in the 

Northern Europe processing study for French apples (with applications at BBCH growth stage 

55), a 0.03X factor reduction was observed for juice (36). 

Apple Sauce 

In 2002, PDP data indicated no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos were present in apple sauce, 

even prior to the apple use pattern change. The newer 2006 PDP data for apple sauce confirms 

no observations of chlorpyrifos residues in 714 samples at an average LOD = 0.002047. Thus 

for apple sauce, the 67 PCT was applied to the 2006 PDP data and was used to create RDF#9 

with 236 true zeros and 478 values at 1⁄2 the LOD = 0.001024 ppm and applied to Apple, sauce 

and Apple, sauce-babyfood. Per above, RDF#9 was also applied to the canned food forms of 

Apple, fruit with peel and Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 24 

Asparagus 

As of 2008 (2), asparagus has only a regional tolerance in the Midwest and Pacific NW states. 

Refreshed 2008 PDP data contained 372 samples, 341 of these (92%) were imports and there 

were 11 observable residues (3% of these samples) with an average LOD = 0.01503 ppm. In the 

remaining 31 domestic samples, there were no observable residues with an average LOD of 

0.01255 ppm. Table 3 indicates US consumption of imported asparagus is ~ 57%. Given the 

over-sampling of imports in the 2008 dataset, the 2008 and 2003 PDP data sets were combined 

to produce a domestic data RDF#2 and an import data set RDF#1 for asparagus. In DEEM these 

were weighted as 0.57 for imports and 0.43 for domestic consumption. The Table 1 estimate for 

PCT was 44%. Thus the RDF#2 for domestic asparagus contained 4 residues, 116 zeros and 87 

at 0.002544 ppm (1/2 the LOD). RDF#2 for imported asparagus contained 17 residues, 287 

zeros and 209 at 0.005642 ppm. These files were applied against all asparagus food forms 

except the canned ones; see below. 

Asparagus canned 

In 2003, PDP collected separate data set for canned asparagus. There was no evidence that the 

canned distribution had over-sampled imports: only 13 of the 354 samples were noted as imports 

and given the nature of the canned distribution, there was no need to create a separate import file. 

There were 6 observable residues (a 2% detection rate). The PCT of 44 was applied to create an 

RDF#3 with 6 residues, 198 values at 0.002 ppm (at 1⁄2 LOD), and 150 zeros. This file was used 

for canned asparagus in DEEM. 

Banana 

Exposure to chlorpyrifos via bananas is minimal. The PDP 2006-08 data set contains 1486 

samples with 3 observable residues at 0.0063 ppm and an average LOD of 0.003713 ppm. 

In 2000, BEAD estimated 14% of imported bananas are likely treated with chlorpyrifos (10). 

RDF#4 (3 residue, 1278 zeros and 205 at 0.00186 ppm as 1⁄2 LOD) was used for all banana 

commodities in DEEM. For Banana, dried and Banana, dried-babyfood a default processing 

factor of 3.9 was added. The assumption of 14 for PCT was likely conservative based on the fact 

there is a <1% detection rate. (3 out of 1483 samples).
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 25 

Beans: Green Beans 

Several sets of PDP data on green beans exist. The most recent years of PDP posted data for 

fresh green beans is 2007 and 2008. For canned green beans the 2003-04 data is available and 

for frozen green beans 2005. Table 1 indicates a maximum PCT of 7%. RDF#42 was built 

using the fresh green bean PDP data with 7 PCT, 1376 true zeros, 14 observation, and 90 values 

of 0.001714 ppm as 1⁄2 averaged LOD. This file was applied to the fresh food and dried forms of 

Bean, snap, succulent in DEEM and to Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood. For the canned form of 

green beans, a total of 928 observations were made with no detections of chlorpyrifos noted. 

RDF#43 was constructed to reflect this data. The file contained 65 values at 0.00236 ppm which 

was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD and 863 true zeros. It was applied to the canned forms of snap beans 

in DEEM. For the 555 analyses of frozen forms of green beans, 1 residue of chlorpyrifos was 

noted. RDF#59 consisted of the one observed value at 0.007 ppm, 38 values at 0.002285 ppm = 

1⁄2 the averaged LOD and 516 true zeros. 

Beans: Group 6C, Dried Shelled Bean/Peas (Excluding Soybean) 

Use of chlorpyrifos on dried legume commodities is limited to seed treatments at planting. All 

treatments are conducted at the same rate, and the tolerance of 0.05 ppm was based on nondetectable residues in field trials (10). Updated market information in Table 1 indicates a 2% 

maximum PCT. The approach used in 2000 (7) is updated for the estimation of residue based on 

the results of the field trials: 1⁄2 the tolerance (because there were no detectable residues in the 

field trials) times 2% crop treated was used as a point estimate for the entire dried bean/peas 

blended commodities. The anticipated residue is 0.025 ppm X 2% CT = 0.0005 ppm. The value 

was applied in DEEM to the following entries: Bean, black, seed; Bean, broad, seed; Bean, 

cowpea, seed; Bean, great northern, seed; Bean, kidney, seed; Bean, lima, seed; Bean, mung, 

seed; Bean, navy, seed; Bean, pink, seed; Bean, pinto, seed; Chickpea, seed; Chickpea, seedbabyfood; Chickpea, flour; Guar, seed; Guar, seed-babyfood; Lentil, seed; Pea, dry; Pea, drybabyfood; Pea, pigeon, seed. 

In 2008, PDP found no detection in canned Kidney beans in 164 samples at an average LOD of 

0.01742 ppm. Based on 2% CT, a legume canned bean RDF#99 was constructed with 2 values of 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 26 

0.00871 ppm and 98 true zeros. This was applied to the canned forms of Bean, kidney, seed; 

Bean, navy, seed; Bean, great northern, seed. 

Beans: Other Peas and Beans for Group 6A and 6B 

No significant changes in usage for green peas or lima beans have been noted. However without 

additional data, the 2008 unrefined SLUA value of 5 PCT was used in this assessment. The PDP 

data for fresh green beans was translated using 5 PCT; RDF#60 was constructed with 14 

observations and 1406 true zeros and 60 values at 0.001714 ppm (1/2 LOD). This file was 

applied to green peas in 6A (Pea, edible podded, succulent) and all DEEM foods in 6B (Bean, 

broad, succulent; Bean, cowpea, succulent; Bean, lima, succulent; Pea, succulent; Pea, 

succulent-babyfood; Pea, pigeon, succulent). 

In addition, the 2003 plus 2006 PDP data for frozen, sweet peas contained over 1293 analyses 

with no observations noted and a 1⁄2 LOD of 0.00201 ppm. RDF#98 was built using a PCT of 5 

with 1228 true zeros and 65 values at 1⁄2 LOD of 0.002014 ppm. It was applied to frozen food 

forms within 6B of bean, lima, succulent; pea, succulent; pea, pigeon, succulent. 

Beef and Other Meats except Pork 

The most recent data for beef comes from the 2002 PDP samplings of beef adipose (301 

samples), beef liver (312 samples) and beef muscle (309 samples). No detections of chlorpyrifos 

above the LOD of 2.8 ppb were observed in any of the samples. Meat commodities are nonblended. In the 2000 EPA acute analysis (10), it was stated 20% of the values in the RDF should 

be at 1⁄2 LOD. This same approach was taken with updated data to create an RDF#37 with 20 

values at 0.0014 ppm which is half the LOD and 80 values of true zeros. This file was applied to 

the following entities in DEEM: Beef, meat, Beef, meat-babyfood, Beef, meat, dried, Beef, meat 

byproducts, Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood, Beef, fat, Beef,fat-babyfood, Beef, kidney, Beef, 

liver, and Beef, liver-babyfood. Following the EPA 2000 assessment (10), this file was also 

applied to horse, sheep and goat commodities in DEEM as well: Horse, meat; Goat, meat; Goat, 

meat byproducts; Goat, fat ;Goat, kidney; Goat, liver; Sheep, meat; Sheep, meat-babyfood; 

Sheep, meat byproducts; Sheep, fat; Sheep, fat-babyfood; Sheep, kidney; and Sheep, liver.
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 27 

Beet, sugar 

Label changes for sugar beets include a reduction in the maximum seasonal rate and a reduced 

number of applications allowed. Sugar beets are a blended commodity used to produce sugar 

and molasses. No direct PDP data on sugar beets was available. Translation procedures used by 

EPA in 2000 (10) for sugar beets from sweet potatoes was used for this assessment. The 2008 

PDP data has a detection rate of only 2%, however the 2003 PDP data set contained a detection 

rate of 15%. To be conservative the 2003, 2004 and 2008 data sets were used. A blended sweet 

potato point estimate was calculated based on 21 PCT with the 165 observed residues which 

summed to 0.9252 ppm, plus 179 samples were set at the averaged 1⁄2 LOD of 0.001071 ppm. 

This information was then translated to sugar beets point estimate as (0.9252+ 

179*0.001071)/1639 = 0.000681 ppm. This value was applied to DEEM food of Beet, sugar, 

Beet, sugar-babyfood, Beet, sugar, molasses, and Beet, sugar, molasses-babyfood. In addition 

for the sugar forms, the processing factor of 0.1X previously used by EPA was also included. 

Broccoli 

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in vegetables for broccoli included a restriction to 

3 applications per season and an addition of a 10-day retreatment interval. Applicable PDP data 

is available for 2006, 2007, and 2008 in broccoli. There were 108 observed residues noted 

ranging from 0.038 to 0.002 ppm and 1367 “no detections” noted with a lower LOD of 0.0012 

ppm. Based on Table 1, a PCT of 37 was used. An RDF#17 was created with 108 values, 929 

true zeros and 438 values at 0.0006 ppm (1/2 averaged LOD). This file was applied to Broccoli, 

Broccoli-babyfood Broccoli, Chinese Broccoli raab. 

Brussels sprouts 

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in vegetables including Brussels sprouts included a 

restriction to 3 applications per season and an addition of a 10-day retreatment interval. 

Previously, up to 6 applications were allowed for Brussels sprouts. No update to the PCT for 

Brussels sprouts was available so per the EPA 2000 assessment, the Broccoli PDP data was 

translated and applied to Brussels sprouts in DEEM using the 2000 BEAD estimate of 91 PCT 

(10). Because the translation was to a crop with a higher PCT, the number of observations 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 28 

needed to be increased by a factor of 91/37 to make 266 values, so the 108 residue values were 

repeated twice and then the remaining 50 values were added as the average (0.00426 ppm) repeat 

from the broccoli file. Thus RDF#28 was created with the 266 observations, 1077 values at 

0.0006 = 1⁄2 LOD and 133 zeros. 

Cabbage 

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in vegetables including cabbage included a 

restriction to 3 applications per season and the addition of a 10-day retreatment interval. Table 1 

indicates an adjusted PCT of 22 is appropriate. Received FDA data (25) for cabbage from 2004 

to 2006 contained 193 observations of which 160 were domestic. Two observed residues were 

noted (one domestic at 0.002 ppm and one import at 0.04 ppm). The 2007 downloaded data for 

cabbage contained 1 observed residue at 0.012 ppm and 61 “no residue found” entries. LOD of 

0.005 ppm is assumed from a review of the methods and this conservatively congruent with the 

LOQ of 0.01 ppm communicated by FDA (25). RDF#22 was built using the 3 observation of 

with 53 values at 0.0025 ppm as 1⁄2 LOD and 199 true zeros. This file was applied to DEEM 

entry of Cabbage. 

Chinese cabbage 

Cabbage data was translated to DEEM entries for Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy ;Cabbage, 

Chinese, napa and Cabbage, Chinese, mustard assuming a PCT of 5%. Thus a RDF#23 was 

created from the 255 observations for cabbage and scaled by the 5 % crop treated assumption for 

a total of 242 zeros, 10 values at 0.0025 ppm and 3 observations. 

Cauliflower 

For cauliflower, the 2004, 2005 and 2006 PDP data contained 1484 analyses with 8 detections of 

chlorpyrifos above the average LOD of 0.001798 ppm. Based on the Table 1 adjusted PCT 

value of 46%, RDF#27 was built using the 1492 total samples with 8 detections, 678 values at 

0.0009 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 806 true zeros. This file was applied to DEEM food for Cauliflower. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 29 

Cherry 

The data from the 2007 PDP monitoring for cherry show no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos 

in the 419 sample tested. Based on the adjusted SLUA estimate of 53% as the maximum PCT 

for cherries (Table 1), a cherry RDF#33 was built with 222 values at 0.001365 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD 

and 197 true zeros. This file was applied to fresh or fresh cooked food forms within the Cherry

group in DEEM. The file was also used for processed and frozen food forms as well as Cherrybabyfood. RDF#33 was also used for Cherry juice and Cherry, juice-babyfood along with the 

0.3X grape juice processing factor. 

Citrus Other: Fruits and Juices 

The current PDP data from oranges (see below) was translated to other citrus (tangerine and 

citrons) using the estimated PCT maximum of 10% (Table 1). RDF#24 was built using the 1483 

total samples with 34 orange residues values, 114 values at 0.002 ppm and 1335 true zeros. This 

file was applied to DEEM foods for Citrus citron, Citrus hybrids, Kumquats, Tangerine. 

Similar to EPA 2000 assessment, tangerine juice was translated from updated PDP orange juice 

data based on 10 PCT for other citrus. The 4 observations in the orange juice were used in RDF 

#31 with 1338 true zeros and 145 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD. This file was applied to 

Tangerine, juice in DEEM. 

A Citrus, oil tolerance of 20 ppm was refined by multiplication by the 10% PCT for an adjusted 

point estimate of 2 ppm. 

Collards and Turnip Greens 

There is 2006, 2007 and 2008 PDP data for collards containing a total of 679 samples with 22 

observed residues. Within the 2007 PDP data one of the samples was an outlier and was marked 

in the PDP database as a violation of the established tolerance. It is also exactly 1000-fold the 

reported detection limit and is a potential mis-transposition of ppb to ppm. Nonetheless for 

conservatism, the value was retained for this analysis. No new information for PCT for collard is 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 30 

available; therefore the 2000 BEAD PCT estimate of 13% was reused to build RDF#20 with 

22 observed residues, 591 true zeros and 66 values at 1⁄2 the average LOD = 0.002074 ppm. 

In 2000, BEAD estimated a PCT of 19% for root and tuber vegetables (10); this value is 

maintained. The 2006 through 2008 collard PDP data was translated to turnip greens using the 

19% PCT value. The RDF#55 was built with the 22 observations plus a repeat 7 times of the 

median value (0.011 ppm) to scale upwards for the upward difference of 13 to 19 PCT. The 

resulting file contained 556 true zeros, 101 values at 0.002074 ppm (1/2 average LOD) and 

29 observed residues and was applied to Turnip, greens in DEEM. 

Corn 

Due to newer GMO corn products and label revisions, there has been a decline in overall sales of 

chlorpyrifos for use on corn. Label revisions include a lower maximum seasonal rate and new 

restrictions on the number of applications allowed per season. Table 1 indicates an adjusted 4% 

PCT. PDP data for raw corn grain is available for 2006-2008. The data set reveals a large 

percentage of detections (24%) at trace levels (on average 3.1 ppb). This high detection rate is 

incongruent with DAS and EPA projections of PCT for corn at 5% or less but instead is a 

reflection of the very low detection limit used (1 ppb or 0.001 ppm) and the fact that stored grain 

is a blended commodity and therefore low level residues may be instead blended to trace levels 

in the commodity chain. Because corn is blended, the anticipated residue in corn based on the 

PDP data set assuming the full background of 1⁄2 LOD would =0.00111035 ppm. This results in 

a higher value than using data from actual field trials. Therefore methodology employed in the 

EPA 2000 acute assessment will be reused. The original assessment used acceptable field trial 

data to calculate an acute anticipated residue in corn at 0.00088 ppm based upon average field 

trial results of 0.011 ppm and 8.0 % crop treated (10). Based on revised market data with a PCT 

of 4%, a residue value of 0.00044 ppm is now appropriate. Given the changes to the label, this is 

still likely an overestimation of current residues. This value was applied the DEEM food Corn, 

field, bran. To convert corn grain data to corn syrup, a processing factor of 0.05 was used (37) in 

DEEM for Corn, field, syrup and Corn, field, syrup-babyfood. This value is supported by the 

fact that no observable residues in corn syrup were found in the 1998 and 1999 PDP corn syrup 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 31 

program in which 454 samples were analyzed across 2 years for 82 pesticides and no observable 

residues were observed in any of the samples (38). For corn oil, a processing factor of 4.5 was 

used (37) for Corn, field, oil and Corn, field, oil-babyfood. A processing factor of 0.22 was 

included for the processed and milled products based on EPA’s assessment of data available for 

agrain washing study (39, 40) and an understanding of corn processing (10). Thus 0.00044 ppm 

was used as the residue and 0.22 as the processing factor for the following in DEEM: Corn, field, 

flour; Corn, field, flour-babyfood; Corn, field, meal; Corn, field, meal-babyfood; Corn, field, 

starch; Corn, field, starch-babyfood.

Corn: Sweet Corn 

The EPA recent SLUA noted a maximum of 15 PCT, however the DAS adjustments indicates a 

PCT value of 18% is more refined. PDP data is available in 2008 for fresh sweet corn, frozen 

sweet corn was monitored in 2003 and 2008 PDP data. In all recent data sets no observable 

detections have been noted. All total there are PDP 1426 observations and no detections of 

chlorpyrifos residues in sweet corn. Also note, pop corn uses have been eliminated from the 

labels for Lorsban® 4E and 15G insecticides. Based on the increase in usage, RDF# 97 for fresh 

corn was built with 125 true zeros and 27 values at 0.007217 ppm (1⁄2 average LOD) for use in 

DEEM for Corn, sweet and Corn, sweet-babyfood. RDF# 96 for frozen sweet corn was built with 

476 true zeros and 104 values at 0.002347 ppm (1⁄2 average LOD) for use with frozen food forms. 

This represents a conservative unrefinement of sorts, because a value of zero was applied to 

sweet corn in the 2000 EPA procedures (10). 

Cottonseed Oil 

With the introduction of GMO cotton, DAS has previously documented a decline from 6% to 5% 

for PCT of chlorpyrifos in cotton (41). Thus the general approach for cotton used in the 2000 

acute assessment has been adjusted for a 5% PCT. The average residue from field trials (0.12 

ppm) and a reduction factor of 0.375 for processing results in a 0.045 ppm anticipated residue 

(AR) in cottonseed oil (37). Because cottonseed oil is a blended commodity, multiplication of 

this AR by 5% crop treated yields 0.00225 ppm which was used in DEEM for: Cottonseed, oil

and Cottonseed, oil-babyfood. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 32 

Cranberries 

PDP 2006 data set for cranberries has a total of 71 observed residues and 245 “no detects”. The 

EPA update to the PCT in Table 1 is 70%. This information was used to construct RDF#16 with 

71 observed residues, 150 values at an averaged 1⁄2 LOD value of 0.00233 ppm and 95 true zeros. 

This file was applied to Cranberry, Cranberry-babyfood and Cranberry, dried Foods in DEEM. 

RDF#16 was also used for Cranberry, juice and Cranberry, juice-babyfood along with the juice 

processing factor of 0.3X per the 2000 acute assessment (10). 

Cucumber and Pumpkin and Other Squash 

PDP monitoring data was available for cucumbers for 2003 and 2004 and the data set contained a 

total of 1296 analyses with a 2% detection rate for chlorpyrifos. Table 1 indicates an adjusted 

PCT of 6% is appropriate for cucumber. RDF#53 was built with the 25 detections, 53 values at 

0.002 ppm ( 1⁄2 LOD) and a balance of 1218 true zeros and applied to Cucumber in DEEM. 

Cucumber and Pumpkin both belong to Group 9B, so similar to the 2000 assessment, the 

cucumber data was translated to pumpkin (10) and a maximum value of 7% is associated with 

pumpkins which is an increase from the 1 PCT from the BEAD Quantitative Usage Analysis 

from 2000 (42). RDF#95 was built with the 25 detections, 66 values at 1⁄2 LOD and a balance of 

1205 true zeros and applied to Pumpkin in DEEM. 

It is also noted that PDP data from 2006 to 2008 contains observed residues at low detection 

rates in summer squash at <1%, and from 2004 to 2006 in winter squash at <2%. However, there 

is no tolerance established in commodities and no legal use for these commodities. These data 

are not included in the assessment for approved uses. 

Fig 

Table 1 contains no PCT estimates for figs. There is no PDP data collected in figs. The tolerance 

value was used with a 1 % PCT assumption (per BEAD 2000 QUA). The RDF #41 contains 1 

value of 0.01 ppm and 99 zeros. This file was applied to DEEM foods: Fig and Fig, dried. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 33 

Grapes 

Per Table 3, imported grapes make up 54% of the consumed grapes in the US. In the recent 

2004 and 2005 PDP data set, 52% of the samples were domestically sourced, 47% were imported 

and 1% was of unknown origin. However a large difference in the detection rate was observed 

in domestic vs. imports; there was a 23% detection rate in the imports but only a 2% detection 

rate in the domestic samples. To make use of this information, two RDF files were created: one 

for domestic residues and one for imports. 

For domestic use, Table 1 shows an increase to 6% PCT for domestic use of chlorpyrifos in table 

grapes. RDF# 56 was built with 15 observations, 31 1⁄2 LOD values of 0.001932 ppm and 715 

true zeros. This RDF file was weighted by a 0.46 factor in DEEM and applied to Grape. 

For imports, most importantly, it is noted that 40% of the historical observations in 2004 and 

2005 PDP data are above the 2008 tolerance of 0.01 ppm (2). With tolerance enforcement, for 

imports, there is now reduced exposure to chlorpyrifos and thus values above tolerance value in 

the import set have been truncated to the tolerance value of 0.01 ppm within the imported PDP 

data set. And 100% PCT for imports is conservatively assumed. RDF#94 was built using 165 

observations (some truncated), and 547 1⁄2 LOD values of 0.001793. This file was weighted by 

0.54 in DEEM and was applied to Grape. 

Grape Juice 

The 2008 PDP data on grape juice was available, with 745 samples, an average LOD of 0.0042 

ppm and no detections. Both domestic and imported juice was sampled. Because grape juice is 

blended, an average value of 1⁄2 LOD of 0.0021 ppm was used for grape juice with no PCT 

adjustment. 

Grape: Raisin 

The 2006 and 2007 PDP monitoring data for raisins has a detection rate of 1% for observed 

residues. Domestic production of raisins is very large in the US. Review of Production Supply 

and Distribution for the US (43) allows for a determination of the relative importance of the 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 34 

imports relative to the consumption of US domestic produce (See Appendix A); imported raisins 

contribute ~ 10% to the US consumer diet. The PDP data set is primarily domestic and imports 

are under sampled. In 2000, BEAD estimated 1% as the PCT (42), but used 7% based on a final 

detection rate in fresh grapes (10). A similar procedure is conservatively used and is presumed 

adequate to account for the 10% imported raisins. The revised domestic 6% grape PCT detection 

is used with the raisin PDP data. RDF#54 was constructed with 5 observations, 699 true zeros, 

and 40 values of 0.002581 ppm which was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD. This was applied to Grape, 

raisin in DEEM and no processing factors were needed. 

Grapefruit and Grapefruit juice 

PDP data from 2005 and 2006 for grapefruit contained 24 observed residues and 1461 values 

below the level of detection. Analyses were performed at two LODs; the average LOD was 

calculated to be 0.001727 ppm. Table 1 indicates a revised maximum PCT of 23 for grapefruit; 

RDF#26 was built with 24 observed residues, 318 values at 0.000863= 1⁄2 average LOD and 1143 

zeros. This file was applied to Grapefruit and Pummelo in DEEM. For Grapefruit juice, RDF# 

26 was applied with the 0.3X juicing factor. 

Kale and Other Greens within Group 5B 

PDP contains data on Kale from 2006-2008, with 802 observations and a detection rate of 4.5%. 

No updated PCT for kale was produced and the 2000 BEAD PCT estimate was 1% (10). For 

this assessment a PCT of 5% was assumed based on the detection rate. RDF#40 was built using 

the 36 observed residues, 762 true zeros and 4 values of 0.001928 ppm (1⁄2 the average LOD). 

In 2000, BEAD estimated 1% PCT for Kohlrabi and Mustard Greens (10, 42) and in the 2000 

acute assessment translated data from collards was applied to cover these crops (10). For this 

updated assessment the kale RDF#40 is conservatively used for application in DEEM to 

Kohlrabi, Mustard greens and Rape, greens. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 35 

Kiwifruit- from Historical FDA Data 

There is very limited new data for kiwis. The FDA data for kiwi in 2007 contains 4 observations 

and no detections. The requested 2004 to 2006 FDA data (25) for kiwi contains 17 null 

observations and 1 observed residue of 0.02 ppm. Because no additional data was available, the 

EPA 2000 kiwi data was reused in RDF#19; the kiwi RDF file on page 125 of 2000 assessment 

(10) represent kiwi with 1000 observations, 3972 zeros, 2971 1⁄2 LOD values updated to 0.0015 

(based on the communicated LOQ of 0.01 (25). The apple peel processing factor of 0.15X was 

applied to kiwi. 

Lemons and Limes 

Based on an adjusted maximum value of 29 PCT (Table 1), RDF#29 was created using a 

translation from the PDP orange data with 34 observations, 396 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD 

and 1053 true zeros. This file was applied to Lemon and Lime in DEEM. For lemon, peel

RDF#29 was applied along with a concentration factor of 15X based on the literature rational 

used in the final acute assessment of 2000 (10). 

Lemon Juice (and lime juice) 

Lemon and lime juice were translated from the updated PDP data on orange juice using 29% 

crop treated from Table 1. Thus RDF#30 has 4 observations, 1056 true zeros and 427 values at 

0.002 ppm (1/2 LOD). This values was applied in DEEM to Lemon, juice, and Lemon, juicebabyfood as well as Lime, juice, and Lime, juice-babyfood.

Lettuce 

Current EPA-approved labels for chlorpyrifos products do not contain lettuce uses. However in 

2008, EPA published a proposed tolerance for lettuce (2) and thus lettuce in included is this 

assessment. PDP data for 2004 and 2005 contained 1486 total analyses with 42 observed 

residues (at a detection rate of 2.8%). Based on no label but given the observations, a 2.8% PCT 

estimate was used and no additional 1⁄2 LOD values were used for RDF#25. Therefore the PDP 

data was parsed between the 42 observations and 1444 true zeros. This file was applied to 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 36 

Lettuce, head and Lettuce, leaf in DEEM. This information was conservatively used to estimate 

potential exposure, but represents a non-supported use at this point in time. 

Milk 

The 2004 and 2005 PDP data contained 1485 analyses of milk with no detections of chlorpyrifos 

at the low detection limit of 0.17 ppb. In 2005, PDP analyzed 369 heavy cream samples with no 

detections for chlorpyrifos at 1.7 ppb. The 2007 PDP data contained 742 samples of heavy 

cream with no detections of chlorpyrifos at the lower detection limit of 1.0 ppb. In addition, in 

2007 PDP also analyzed for the chlorpyrifos-oxon in cream samples; there were no detections 

noted out of 742 samples of heavy cream. These findings are congruent with previous 

observations summarized in the EPA 2000 acute assessment where no residues had been found 

in historical PDP, FDA or the DAS NFS survey for over 3600 samples. Per the 2000 EPA 

procedures, the anticipated residue for milk was assumed to be zero for milk forms in DEEM: 

Milk, nonfat solids, Milk, nonfat solids-baby food/infant, Milk, water, Milk, waterbabyfood/infant formula, Milk, sugar (lactose)-baby food/infant , Milk,fat and Milk, fat - baby 

food/infant formula.

Mint and Mint Oils 

The approach for mint and oils was reused from the EPA 2000 acute assessment (10). Mint oils, 

spearmint and peppermint, are considered blended commodities. For the oils, an average point 

estimate was calculated for each commodity using the tolerance for chlorpyrifos on mint and 

spearmint of 0.8 ppm and a processing factor of 10X, combined with the maximum estimated 

percent crop treated of 25% (Table 1) to yield a point estimate of 2.0 ppm. This point estimate 

was applied to Peppermint, oil and Spearmint, oil in DEEM. For the raw mint leaves the point 

estimate of 0.20 ppm was applicable to Peppermint and Spearmint in DEEM.

Onion 

PDP 2003 data contains 216 observations for onions with no detections above the LOD of 0.01 

ppm. Table 1 lists an adjusted maximum PCT of 57%. RDF#35 was constructed with 57 values 

of 0.005 ppm at 1⁄2 LOD and 43 true zeros. The file was applied to Onion forms in DEEM: 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 37 

Onion, dry bulb, Onion, dry bulb-babyfood. Dried onion is considered blended: Onion, dry bulb, 

dried and Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood. For these forms, 1⁄2 the LOD = 0.005 ppm was used 

as a point estimate adjusted by the PCT of 57% to 0.00285 ppm (3) along with the DEEM 

default processing factor of 9X. 

Orange 

Revisions to the Lorsban® insecticide labels include several clarifications and a seasonal 

maximum reductions for foliar and orchard floors. The 2004 thru 2006 PDP data contained 1483 

samples of oranges with 34 measurable residues (min= 0.0007, max = 0.017 ppm); there were 

~2% detects. In the EPA 2000 acute version, BEAD provided an overall estimate of 19% PCT 

for oranges as a whole, but that 10% of processed and 54% of fresh oranges eaten were treated 

with chlorpyrifos, no similar information was provided in the 2008 SLUA. A review of the US 

PSD data for oranges (43) and shown in Appendix A indicates 77% of produced oranges are 

processed. Table 1 indicates an updated maximum PCT of 16% overall. Based on the 2000 

EPA ratio examples, the previous 54 % PCT for fresh production and 10% PCT for processed 

were scaled by 16/19, to give revised values of 45% PCT for fresh oranges and 9% PCT for 

processed oranges. 

From the orange PDP data, an RDF#5 was created for processed oranges with 34 observed 

residues, 99 values at 0.002 ppm (1⁄2 the LOD of 0.004 ppm) and 1350 zeros to represent the 91% 

untreated. This distribution was applied to oranges that are canned, plus also Orange, peel. Also 

for orange peels, a concentration factor of 15X was utilized based on the literature rational used 

in the final acute assessment of 2000 (10). 

For fresh oranges, an RDF#6 was created from the PDP data with 34 observed residues, 633 

values at 0.002 ppm (1⁄2 the LOD of 0.004 ppm) and 816 zeros to represent the 55% untreated.

Orange Juice 

PDP data from 2004-2006 reports four residues in orange just above the LOD, out of 1,487 

analyses. RDF#14 was constructed from the PDP data and based on the 9% PCT derived above 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 38 

for processed oranges and are treated with chlorpyrifos and contained four residues at 0.007 

ppm, 1,353 true zeros and 130 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD. This distribution was applied to 

DEEM entries of: Orange, juice Orange, juice-babyfood. 

Peaches 

Label changes for peach include a limitation of one treatment annually. PDP data from 2008 to 

2006 contains 1261 samples with 218 observation and 1043 no observable detections for a 

detection rate of 17.3%. A deeper review of those detections indicates that over 90% of the 

residue exposure results from imported samples (Table 3), but that there is only a 9.1% import 

consumption rate in the US. Therefore the PDP data set was divided into two RDF files. 

RDF#57 was built for domestic peaches with 23 observations, 552 true zeros and 274 1⁄2 LOD 

values at average 0.004217 ppm, based on the 35% PCT of Table 1. RDF#63 was built for 

imported peaches with 194 observations, 41 true zeros and 171 1⁄2 LOD values at average 

0.00186 ppm, based on a conservative assumption of 90% PCT. These files were parsed in 

DEEM with a 0.91 and 0.09 ratio for the domestic/import ratio for RDF files to the fresh fruit 

food forms for Peach and also to Peach, dried (nonbaked food forms), Peach, dried-babyfood, 

with the default processing factor of 1.8. These files were also used for Peach, juice and Peach, 

juice-babyfood with the 0.3X processing factor for juice. 

Nectarines 

The 2007 and 2008 PDP monitoring data for nectarines is similar to the peach with a 13% 

detection rate overall, but the domestic rate was <2% whereas the import detection rate was 35%. 

Thus similar to peaches, two RDF files were constructed. RDF# 61 was constructed with 9 

detections, 564 true zeros and 233 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025 to represent domestic production at 

30% PCT from EPA 2008 SLUA. For imports, RDF# 64 was constructed with 147 detections, 

106 true zeros and 171 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025, with the conservative assumption of 75% 

PCT for imports. This data set was parsed to Nectarine by a 91/9 weighting for domestic/import 

consumption. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 39 

Peaches, canned 

PDP data from 2003 and 2004 was available for the canned forms. The PDP data contained 

1485 analyses with no detections of chlorpyrifos in canned peaches (at the LOD of 0.01 ppm). 

RDF#58 was constructed to reflect this using the 35% PCT to contain 35 values at 0.005 ppm 

and 65 true zeros. This file was applied to the canned, baked fried food forms for Peach as well 

as Peach-babyfood, and Peaches, dried but with the 1.8X drying factor. 

Peanuts –FDA data 

Label changes for peanuts included either a cap on the maximum seasonal rate for Lorsban® 4E 

insecticide or a cap of 2 applications per season for Lorsban® 15G insecticide. Table 1 indicates 

a current maximum of 6% PCT for peanuts. However, peanuts are considered blended (3) so for 

the acute assessment this PCT was not used to further refine the LODs. The FDA data for 

peanuts in 2007 contains 14 observations and no detections. The requested 2004 to 2006 FDA 

data (25) for peanuts contains 28 null observations. Because no additional data was available at 

this time, the older EPA 2000 peanut RDF files with six observations in the 1990s was 

conservatively re-used to represent peanuts. RDF#50 with the six residues of 0.021, 0.02, 0.02, 

0.0005, 0.04 and 0.0005 ppm from page 135 of REF (10) was built along with 94 1⁄2 LOD values 

at 0.0025 ppm based on recent FDA communication of a 0.01 ppm value as typical for an LOQ 

(25). This file was also applied to Peanut, oil along with the 2X concentration factor for peanut 

oil (37). 

Peanut Butter 

PDP data in 2006 includes 739 analyses with no detections observed and an LOD of 27 ppb. It is 

summarized that the drop in residues is likely a result of the label changes. Peanut butter is 

blended so that no refinement for PCT is used. Based on the 2006 PDP data, a point estimate of 

0.00081 ppm was derived based on 1⁄2 the LOD = 13.5 ppb = 0.0135 ppm multiplied by the 

adjusted 6% PCT. This was applied to Peanut, butter within DEEM. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 40 

Pears and Pear Juice 

Table 1 indicates a PCT of 25% for pears. In the 1400 plus samples of the 2003, 2004 and 2005 

PDP data set for pears, there was a 2% detection rate of observable residues. RDF#49 was built 

with the 25% PCT, the 33 observed residues, 1112 true zeros and 338 values at 0.00169 ppm 

which was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD. Given the ratio of 207 import samples to 1265 domestic 

samples and an overall import consumption rate of 20% (Table 3), this distribution was not 

subdivided into domestic and imports. This file was applied to Pear and Pear-babyfood in 

DEEM. It was also applied to Pear, dried in DEEM along with the default processing factor of 

6.25 X foods in DEEM with 0.15X for peeling (per dried apples). This overall value of 0.94 

ppm is congruent with other direct observations in dried fruit where no concentration has been 

observed in dried plums. 

There were 64 PDP analyses of pear juice, concentrate and puree in 2002 and 2003; with no 

observable residues noted. Because there were less than 100 observations for pear juice, the 

RDF#49 was also applied to Pear, juice and Pear, juice-babyfood with the 0.3 grape juice factor. 

Peppers 

The 2003 to 2004 PDP data contains 1299 analysis of sweet bell peppers and 232 reported 

detections of chlorpyrifos above the LOD of 0.0012 ppm. The 18% detection rate is incongruent 

with PCT 2008 SLUA estimate of 5% PCT. A review of the PDP data reveals the majority of 

the observed detections were sourced from Mexico, not domestically. As summarized in Table 3 

the sampling rate for imports in PDP was 29% (366 import samples out of 1274) and US 

population consumes about 34% imported peppers. Therefore, within 5% the PDP data set is 

representative of imports and domestic exposure and a single RDF#32 was intended to be 

constructed with 232 residues, 1039 true zeros and 28 values at 0.0006 ppm (1/2 LOD) 

conservatively based on an overall PCT rate of 20% based on the detection rate. (A small error 

was noted during the QA of this report; the actual pepper file used contained 1299 true zeros 

instead of the planned 1039 true zeros. Because this report provides documentation of the input 

files passed onward in a new PBPK modeling effort (44), the error is just noted here.) Per the 

EPA 2000 assessment, the bell pepper data was translated to all pepper forms in DEEM: Pepper, 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 41 

bell, Pepper, bell-babyfood, Pepper, bell, dried, Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood, Pepper, nonbell, 

Pepper, nonbell-babyfood, Pepper, nonbell, dried. 

Plums and Prunes 

PDP data on plums was available for 2005 and 2006. There were 1083 total analyses with 130 

observable residues. The detection rate of 12% is incongruent with the domestic adjusted 

maximum PCT of 9% (Table 1). Table 3 indicates that the majority of exposure comes from the 

imports within this file (~90%) but that US consumption of imports is <10% and that the PDP 

data has oversampled imported samples (424 samples out of total of 1083). Based on this two 

distributions were used. For domestic plums, RDF#44 was built with 20 observed values and 

600 true zeros, 39 LOD values at the 1⁄2 average LOD of 0.002809 ppm based on the 9% PCT. 

For imports, RDF#93 was built with 110 observations, 297 true zeros, 17 1⁄2 average LOD values 

at 0.003016 ppm based on a 30% PCT (rounded up from detection rate in imported samples). 

The RDF#44 and RDF#93 distributions were parsed in DEEM with 0.92 and 0.08 weightings, 

respectively and applied to Plum; Plum-babyfood; Plum, prune, fresh; Plum, prune, freshbabyfood in DEEM. RDF#44 was also used with the juice processing factor of 1.4 for Plum, 

prune, juice; Plum, prune, juice-babyfood.

Similarly 2005 and 2006 PDP data was available for “Plums, Dried (Prunes)”. Of the 377 

analyses of the dried plums, no detections were noted. RDF#45 was built using the 9% PCT 

with 34 values at 1⁄2 the average LOD = 0.00271 ppm and 343 true zeros, and applied to Plum, 

prune, dried; Plum, prune, dried-babyfood. Because the dried commodity was observed 

directly, the default processing factor of 5X was removed. 

Pork Fat 

In 2005, PDP analyzed 352 pork adipose samples for chlorpyrifos and found 1 residue (at 2.5 

ppb) above the LOD of 1.5 ppb. This finding was extremely congruent with historical DAS data 

from the NFS study which found 1 residue (at 3.5 ppb) out of 200 samples. Based on the 20% 

rationale of livestock feeding percentages in the EPA 2000 acute assessment, the updated PDP 

data was used to create RDF#38 was created with 1 residue, 39 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.00075 ppm 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 42 

and 160 true zeros. This file was applied to Pork, fat, Pork, skin, and Pork, fat-babyfood in 

DEEM.

Pork Meat 

In 2005, PDP analyzed 352 pork muscle samples for chlorpyrifos and reported no observable 

residues with an LOD of 0.75 ppb. This null finding is understandable given the separate 

analyses of meat and fat coupled with the very low findings in pork fat (1 of 353). Based on 

these findings and the 20% rationale of livestock feeding percentages in the EPA 2000 acute 

assessment, RDF#39 was created with 20 values at 0.000375 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 80 true zeros. 

RDF#39 was applied in DEEM to Pork, meat, Pork, meat-babyfood, Pork, meat byproducts, 

Pork, meat byproducts-babyfood, Pork, kidney, and Pork, liver. 

Poultry Meat 

2006 PDP data is available. 654 samples each of poultry breast and thighs were sampled; no 

observable residues were reported with an LOD of 1.5 ppb. The PCT of 10% from the 2000 

assessment was retained. A RDF# 46 was built with 10 values at 0.00075 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 90 

true zeros. This file was applied to the following foods in DEEM: Poultry, other, meat; Poultry, 

other, liver; Poultry, other, meat byproduct; Chicken, meat; Chicken, meat-babyfood; Chicken, 

liver; Chicken, meat-byproducts; Chicken, meat-byproducts baby food; Turkey, meat; Turkey, 

meat-babyfood; Turkey, liver; Turkey,liver-babyfood;Turkey,meat-byproduct; Turkey,meatbyproducts-babyfood.

Poultry Fat 

There are no new direct measurements of poultry fat; therefore RDF file generated in the EPA 

2000 assessment (Table 15) has been reused (10). RDF#47 was generated using the anticipated 

residue for poultry fat derived from animal burdens and feeding study information and an 

assumed PCT value of 10% for treated animals feeds. Therefore it contains 90 true zeros and 10 

values at 0.000672 ppm. This file was applied to following in DEEM: Chicken, fat; Chicken, 

fat-babyfood; Chicken, skin; Chicken, skin-baby food; Poultry, other, fat; Poultry, other, skin, 

Turkey, fat; Turkey, fat-babyfood; Turkey, skin; Turkey, skin-babyfood. This assessment is 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 43 

actually conservative based on other measurements for animal fat which indicated there are <1% 

detections and very low residues. 

Poultry Eggs 

There are no new direct monitoring measurements of chlorpyrifos residues in eggs; therefore the 

RDF file generated in the EPA 2000 assessment (Table 15) has been re-used (10). RDF#48 was 

generated using the anticipated residue for poultry eggs derived from animal burdens and feeding 

study information and an assumed PCT value of 10% for treated animals feeds. Therefore it 

contains 90 true zeros and 10 values at 0.000105 ppm. This file was applied to following in 

DEEM: Egg, whole; Egg, whole-babyfood; Egg, white; Egg, white (solids)-babyfood; Egg, yolk; 

Egg, yolk-babyfood.

Radish 

Current PDP sweet potato data was translated to radishes based on estimate of 19 PCT for all 

root and tubers per the 2000 BEAD QUA (10). RDF#92 contained 165 observations, 1328 true 

zeros and 146 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.001071 ppm and was applied to Radish, roots and Radish, 

Oriental, roots in DEEM.

Sorghum 

Table 1 indicates an adjusted maximum PCT of 1% is appropriate. No direct data was used for 

sorghum, instead field trial data from corn was translated to sorghum using a 1% PCT; thus a 

point estimate of 0.00011 ppm was applied in DEEM to Sorghum, grain. To convert sorghum 

grain data to syrup, a processing factor of 0.05 was used (45) in DEEM for Sorghum, syrup. 

Soybeans 

Recent changes to the soybean use pattern include an added cap of 3 applications per season and 

clarification of a 10 day retreatment interval. Chlorpyrifos usage on soybeans has an adjusted 

maximum of 7% PCT (Table 1). Because soybean is a blended commodity with a low PCT, 

typically a point estimate is derived. For soybeans, the average residue (0.032 ppm) from the 

representative field trial conducted with a maximum seasonal application rate of 3 lb ai/A and a 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 44 

28 day PHI (46) was scaled by 7% PCT and the final value of 0.00224 ppm derived was used in 

DEEM for Soybean, seed, Soybean, flour, Soybean, flour-babyfood, Soybean, soy milk, and 

Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or infant. This same average was also used for soybean oil and its 

baby food counterpart along with the additional processing factor of 0.14 used previously by 

EPA (10). 

It is also noted PDP data for 2003, 2004 and 2005 is available for soybeans and it seems to imply 

a much higher percent crop treated with a detection rate in raw grain of 17.7%. This is 

understood, however, as a reflection of the blended nature of soybean grain and the low detection 

rate of 3 ppb. 

Strawberry 

PDP data from 2004 and 2005 plus 2008 contained a total of 2209 analyses of strawberries with 

66 detects observed at an average LOD of 0.001280 ppm. Using an adjusted maximum of 33% 

PCT from Table 1, RDF#36 was constructed with the 66 detects, 1480 true zeros and 663 values 

at 0.00128 ppm (1⁄2 the averaged LOD value). RDF#36 was applied to DEEM foods of 

Strawberry and Strawberry-babyfood. For the juice forms in DEEM (Strawberry, juice and 

Strawberry, juice-babyfood), RDF#36 was used along with the grape juice processing factor of 

0.3X. 

Sunflower 

Per Table 1, the PCT for sunflowers has increased over the last few years; an adjusted value of 

9% was used for the maximum. Therefore a RDF#62 was created with 9 measured residues of 

0.046 ppm and 91 zeros. This was applied to Sunflower, seed in DEEM. Similar to the EPA 

2000 acute assessment, sunflower oil was treated as a blended commodity but with an increased 

9 PCT. Therefore an average residue of 0.00046 ppm *9 = 0.00414 ppm was applied to 

Sunflower, oil and Sunflower, oil-babyfood in DEEM. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 45 

Sweet Potato 

PDP data from 2003, 2004 and 2008 was available for sweet potatoes. The data set contained a 

10% observed residues rate with a maximum concentration of 0.084 ppm. The full data set was 

1,639 samples which had reported LODs of either 0.0013 or 0.004 ppm. Table 1 indicates an 

estimated PCT of 65% based on 2002 data within the EPA 2008 SLUA. RDF#52 contains 574 

true zeros, 165 observed residues and 900 values set at 0.001071 ppm which is 1⁄2 the averaged 

LOD. This file was applied to Sweet potato and Sweet potato-babyfood within DEEM: For 

canned forms of sweet potato in DEEM, the processing factor of 0.15X (apple peeling) was also 

applied. 

Tree Nuts 

Chlorpyrifos has separate tolerances at 0.2 ppm established for four types of tree nuts: almond, 

hazelnut, pecan, walnut (2). PDP data for almonds from 2007 and 2008 is available and shows a 

42% detection rate (based on the low ppb LOD) in 547 overall samples. This data indicates that 

the adjusted maximum PCT values of Table 1 were too low for almonds at 27%. For almonds, 

the RDF#10 was built with the implied 43% detection rate with 232 observations, 3 1⁄2 LOD 

values at 0.0005 ppm and 312 true zeros. This file was applied to Almond and Almond, oil as 

well as their baby food counterparts in DEEM. (It is assumed that filberts and hazelnut 

information is interchangeable for this dietary assessment.) For filberts, the 2008 EPA SLUA 

PCT value of 20% was used with the 232 almond observations and additional zeros were added 

to bring the detection rate down to 20% with 928 zeros in RDF#11 and applied to Filbert and

Filbert, oil, oil as in DEEM. Similarly for Pecans at 35% PCT, the 232 observations were 

combined with 431 true zeros in RDF#12 and applied to Pecan as in DEEM. For Walnuts at 

55% PCT, the 232 observations were combined with 246 zeros and 69 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.0005 

ppm in RDF#13 and applied to Walnut as in DEEM. 

Turnip and Rutabagas 

Similar to the 2000 assessment, a translation from current PDP data for sweet potatoes is made to 

turnips and rutabagas. A RDF#51 contained 165 observations, 1328 true zeros and 900 1⁄2 LOD 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 46 

values at 0.001071 ppm and was applied to Rutabaga and Turnip, roots in DEEM. For canned 

forms of rutabagas in DEEM the processing factor of 0.15X (apple peeling) was also applied. 

Drinking Water – PDP and NAQWA Data 

For this assessment, the PDP data sets for water were used. The PDP data contained various 

water analyses over all years from 2003 to 2007. Results were reported as four types of water: 

bottled water, finished water, drinking water and unfinished water in 3688 analyzed samples. In 

all cases no observable residues were reported. The LODs ranged from 30 ppt to 6 ppt, so an 

average weighted LOD of 16.5 ppt was calculated from all observations. In addition, in 2007 

PDP also analyzed for the chlorpyrifos oxon in water samples; there were no detections noted 

out of 238 samples of finished and untreated drinking water. A 1⁄2 average LOD of 0.000008 

ppm for all water sources was used. 

Wheat 

Recent changes to the wheat use pattern include a maximum application rate of 0.5 lb ai/acre and 

clarification of a 10 day retreatment interval. The current PDP data contains separate 

distributions for wheat grain and wheat flour. 

For Wheat, grain and Wheat, grain-babyfood, RDF#15 was created using 2004, 2005 and 2006 

PDP data. The files contained 8 observed residues and 935 values at 0.003 ppm (1/2 LOD); 

because wheat is a blended commodity (3) no true zeros were used. This may be an 

overestimation of exposure given the small PCT of wheat. RDF#15 was used for Wheat, germ

along with the processing factor of 2.7X from the EPA’s 2000 assessment. For Wheat, bran, the 

RDF#15 was used with a Processing Factor of 3X. 

For flour, PDP data from 2003 and 2004 contained a total of 1311 no detects at an LOD of 0.006 

ppm. (The current PDP LOD of 0.006 ppm is slightly higher than the historical weighted 

average LOD = 0.00482 ppm available (10) for the 2000 assessment.) Because flour is a blended 

commodity, in order to use the current flour PDP data, no adjustment for PCT would be available 

and the 1⁄2 the LOD value = 0.003 ppm is applicable as the average residue within DEEM (3). 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 47 

However, this is likely an overestimation given that the estimate of PCT 5% for wheat (Table 1). 

Moreover the detection rate in the updated PDP data is significantly lower (<1% versus 13%) 

than in the previous decade, yet the LOD used is higher and therefore the average residue 

calculated from the updated monitoring data would be artificially affected by the LOD. 

Therefore per the procedures used in 2000, the wheat grain RDF#15 is used with the processing 

factor for flour of 0.145 (47) for both Wheat, flour and Wheat, flour-babyfood. In addition, the 

boiled food forms used the previous factor of 0.026X employed by EPA in past assessments 

(47). 

ACUTE DIETARY ASSESSMENT 

Appendix C documents the DEEM version 2.16 input file used which draws on the individual 

commodity information for the ~ 70 RDF files in Appendix B. A summary of the RDF files 

information as produced by DEEM is found in Appendix D. The analysis is based on existing 

chlorpyrifos registrations with the tolerances established in the Federal Register in the 2008 Final 

Rule (2). The key output assessment (Summary calculations--per capita from the DEEM-FCID 

ACUTE Analysis with 1994-98) by sub population is found in Appendix E. Because the PCT 

had already been incorporated into the RDF files or the point estimates, adjustment factor #2 was 

not used. The Monte Carlo option was used with 5000 iterations and a seed of 24. The risk 

estimates are calculated based on current aPAD which varies by subpopulation. 

The estimated acute dietary exposure does not exceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of 

the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD)] for the general US population and relevant 

population subgroups at the 99.9 th percentile of exposure. The estimated dietary exposure for 

the general U.S. population at the 99.9th percentile exposure was 0.000169 mg/kg/day, or 3.4% 

aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the most highly exposed population subgroup, dietary 

exposure was 0.000273 mg/kg/day, or 54.6% aPAD. At the 99.9th percentile, acute risks are not 

of concern for the most highly exposed population sub-group, children 1-2 years old. A 

summary of the key information per capita for the 99.9th percentile is summarized in the 

following table. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 48 

Summary Table: Calculations (per Capita) from DEEM Acute Assessment 

Population Exposure 

(mg/kg/day) 

% aPAD MOE 

(relative to 

NOEL) 

U.S. Population 0.000169 3.39 2952 

All infants 0.000211 42.14 2373 

Nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000143 28.69 3486 

Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000212 42.44 2356 

Children 1-6 yrs 0.000253 50.63 1975 

Children 7-12 yrs 0.000157 31.41 3183 

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.000185 36.96 2705 

Females 13+ (nursing) 0.000161 32.10 3115 

Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing) 0.000100 19.93 5016 

Females 20+ (not preg or nursing) 0.000150 29.91 3343 

Females 13-50 yrs 0.000135 26.94 3711 

Males 13-19 yrs 0.000130 2.61 3834 

Males 20+ yrs 0.000154 3.08 3247 

Seniors 55+ 0.000166 3.31 3017 

Children 1-2 yrs 0.000273 54.62 1830 

Children 3-5 yrs 0.000225 44.95 2224 

Children 6-12 yrs 0.000159 31.71 3153 

Youth 13-19 yrs 0.000115 23.04 4339 

Adults 20-49 yrs 0.000146 2.92 3426 

Adults 50+ yrs 0.000166 3.31 3018 

Females 13-49 yrs 0.000134 26.84 3726 

Commodity Contributions 

An analysis was conducted to determine the foods or food forms which contribute the most to the 

exposure estimates for the highest potentially exposed subpopulation of children 1-2 years old. 

Grape juice and grapes, collards and kiwi modeled as significant sources of dietary exposure in a 

limited (942 iteration) Critical Exposure Contribution (CEC) analysis of this assessment file (See 

Appendix F). The grape exposure is being driven by imported grapes truncated to the tolerance 

value. The grape juice exposure is a reflection of the high consumption of grape juice by 

children and the practice of using a 1⁄2 LOD value for blended commodities; there were no 

observable residues in the PDP grape juice data set. The apparent importance of collards is 

likely an artifact of a single high outlier value included in the RFD file. As discussed in the text, 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 49 

it is likely a mistransposition of ppb to ppm given the reported minimum was 0.0063 ppm and 

the questionable value is 6.3 ppm. The FDA kiwi dataset was reused from the 2002 assessment 

with a peeling factor, because there was no new data. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 50 

REFERENCES 

1. US EPA, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Chlorpyrifos, EPA 738-R-01-

007, February 2002, http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf , accessed 

on October 24, 2007. 

2. US Federal Register, Vol 73 FR 53739, Sept. 17, 2008, per e CFR, 

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?c=ecfr&sid=2c9442510d3cd02d9f79a6e0768ea110&rgn=div8&view=text&node=40

:23.0.1.1.28.3.19.126&idno=40, accessed April 19, 2010. 

3. US EPA, Classification of Food Forms With Respect to Level of Blending, HED SOP 

99.6, August 20, 1999. 

4. US EPA, Translation of Monitoring Data, HED SOP 99.3, March 26, 1999. 

5. US EPA, Assigning Values to Non-Detectable/Non-Quantifiable Pesticide Residues in 

Human Health Food Exposure Assessments, March 23, 2000. 

6. US EPA, Pesiticde Science Policy; Notice of Withdrawal, EPAHQOPP20080935; 

FRL88047, Sept 29, 2010. 

7. US EPA, Memorandum Carbofuran. Revised Acute Probabilistic Dietary Exposure 

Assessment to Support Risk Mitigation for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (Phase 

VI): DP D330841, DN: 347526, July 20, 2006. 

8. US EPA, Aldicarb. List A Reregistration Case No. 0140/Chemical ID No. 098301, Acute 

Revised Dietary Exposure Analyses for the HED Human Health Risk, DP D299882, 

November 1, 2006. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 51 

9. US EPA, Methomyl. Acute, Probabilistic Aggregate Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) 

Exposure and Risk Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision, DP D340694, 

June 19, 2007, accessed as EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0975-0003 at www.Regulations.gov on 

November 1, 2007. 

10. US EPA, Memorandum Chlorpyrifos. Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos, 

Revised after Public Comments: Chemical No. 59101: DP Barcode D263890, June 22, 

2000. 

11. L. E. Gomez, Use and Benefits of Chlorpyrifos in US Agriculture, May 18, 2009, 

Registration Review Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-085. 

12. DEEM-FCID version 2.16, Exponent, 2007. 

13. J. Johnston, Exponent, personal communication on November 1, 2007, to use Appendix 

D of DEEM Manual, Novigen, 2000. 

14. EPA, Chlorpyrifos 059101, Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA), February 7, 2008, 

EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0850-0005. 

15. K. D. Racke, N. N. Poletika, D. R. Juberg, C. A. Loy, C. B. Cleveland, L. E. Gomez, C. 

J. Burns, M. J. Bartels, F. B. Selman, D. Yon, and M. Douglas, Dow AgroSciences' 

Response to EPA's Chlorpyrifos, May 18, 2009, Registration Review Docket EPA-HQOPP-2008-0850. 

16. B. Hendrix, Dow AgroSciences, Changes in the Agricultural Uses of Lorsban® 

insecticides, Internal Presentation, February 2005. 

17. DEEM Manual, Novigen, 2000. 

18. Marty, MS; Andrus, AK, Comparison of Cholinesterase (ChE) Inhibition in Young Adult 

and Preweanling CD Rats after Acute and Repeated Chlorpyrifos Exposures, Study ID: 

091107, Unpublished Report of Dow AgroSciences, MRID 48139301, June 29, 2010. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 52 

19. R. Reiss, B. Neal and J. Lamb, Benchmark Dose Modeling for Cholinesterase Inhibition 

from Exposure to Chlorpyrifos and Chlorpyrifos-Oxon, Unpublished Report of Dow 

AgroSciences, Report IN 0900956.000 B0T) 06010, MRID 48139302, June 30, 2010. 

20. USDA PDP, Pesticide Data Program, 

http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateG&to

pNav=&leftNav=ScienceandLaboratories&page=PDPDownloadData/Reports&descriptio

n=Download+PDP+Data/Reports&acct=pestcddataprg , reaccessed April 22, 2010. 

21. Blomquist, J. D., Denis, J. M., Cowles, J. P., Hetrick, J. A., Jones, R. D., Birchfield, N. 

B., 2001. Pesticides in Selected Water-Supply Reservoirs and Finished Drinking Water, 

1999-2000: Summary of Results from a Pilot Monitoring Program. Open-File Report 

01-456, United States Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD. 

22. Tierney, D. P., Christensen, B. R., Culpepper, V. C., 2001. Drinking Water Monitoring 

Study for Six Organophosphorus Insecticides and Four Oxons from 44 Community 

Water Systems on Surface Water in the United States, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 

Study No. 1300-00 (MRID 45513501). 

23. DeSimone, L.A. (2009). Quality of Water from Domestic Wells in Principal Aquifers of 

the United States, 1991–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 

2008–5227, available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5227. 

24. FDA Pesticide Program Residue Monitoring, 

http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/Pesticides/Residue

MonitoringReports/default.htm , accessed April 22, 2010 and October 18, 2010. 

25. FDA, Ronald Roy, letter to Cheryl B. Cleveland, dated May 13, 2010. 

26. FDA residue monitoring data set for 2007, 

http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/Pesticides/Residue

MonitoringReports/ucm172746.htm visited on April 29, 2010. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 53 

27. Wirtz, Mark S, FDA, personal communications by email on November 15, 2007 and 

January 11, 2008. 

28. PAM I Manual, Chapter 1, Section 105, 

www.fda.gov/downloads/.../PesticideAnalysisManualPAM/ucm111496.pdf accessed on 

April 29, 2010. 

29. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Production Supply and Distribution, Online, 

Custom Query (http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx), accessed April 21, 

2010. 

30. USDA, Economics, Statistics, and Market Information System, 

(http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/homepage.do), accessed for “US Tomato 

Statistics (92010)” on April 21, 2010. 

31. USDA, Economics, Statistics, and Market Information System, 

(http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/homepage.do), accessed for “US Bell & 

Chile Pepper Statisics” on April 23, 2010. 

32. Mary Peet, NCSU, Cucumber, Sustainable Practices for Vegetable Production in the 

South, http://ncsu.edu/sustainable/profiles/c10cuke.html, accessed April 21, 2010. 

33. K. Dorschner, Chlorpyrifos: Magnitude of Residue on Apple, IR-4 Study ID 0890, 

Report 08015.01-CAR02, MRID 46159101, December 08, 2003. 

34. C. Merino, Dow AgroSciences, personal communication, R&D Chile, August 2009. 

35. Dow AgroSciences, revised specimen label for Lorsban* 4E Insecticide, September 12 

2002. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 54 

36. J. Hughes, Residues of Chlorpyrifos in Apples at Intervals and Harvest and in Process 

Fractions Following Multiple Applications of EF-1551 - Northern Europe – 2004, 

Internal Report of Dow AgroSciences, Report number GHE-P-10867, September 17, 

2005. 

37. S. Knizner, Chlorpyrifos Anticipated Residues for DRES Acute Analysis, DP Barcode: 

D216468, 10/95. 

38. United States Department of Agriculture, USDA, Pesticide Data Program, PDPDownload Data/Reports Webpage, 1999 and 1998 Summary reports. 

39. A. Tejada et al, The Philippine Agriculturist, 73: 375-385, 1990. 

40. S. Lee, J. Agric. Food Chem. 39: 906-908, 1991. 

41. C. B. Cleveland, Updated Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos: Includes 

Proposed Barley and Grass Uses, MRID 47350301, Internal Report of Dow 

AgroSciences, Study Report: 081012, February 2008. 

42. US EPA BEAD, Quantitative Usage Analysis, Chlorpyrifos, revised February 14, 2000 

as posted in Ref (10). 

43. USDA FAS, Production Supply and Distribution Online, 

http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx accessed July 30, 2008 and April 28, 

2010. 

44. P. S. Price, K. D. Schnelle, C. B. Cleveland, M. J. Bartels, P. M. Hinderliter, C. 

Timchalk, and T.S. Poet, Application of a Source-to-Outcome Model for the Assessment 

of Dietary Exposures to Insecticide Residues, submitted to Reg Tox Pharm. in August 

2010.

45. S. Knizner, Chlorpyrifos Anticipated Residues for DRES Acute Analysis, DP Barcode: 

D216468, 10/95. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 55 

46. Miller, P. W., Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a 

Description of the Analytical Method: Chlorpyrifos. Includes Method ACR 73.5 dated 

12/6/73, ACR 71.19R dated 9/27/73, GH-C 1224, CDL099023-P, MRID #00095270. 

47. M. Flood, PP#3F2947, 8/10/92, within US EPA, Memorandum Chlorpyrifos. Chronic 

Exposure Assessment for Chlorpyrifos RED with Updated Values for Anticipated 

Residues, Revised After Public Comments: Chemical No. 59101: DP Barcode D263889, 

June 22, 2000. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 56 

Table 1. Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA 

Major Crops 

 DAS 

Annual 

Usage 

 {lb ai} 

 EPA’s 

SLUA 

Estimate 

(Lb ai) 

 % Diff. 

EPA 

Estimate 

vs. 

Actual 

EPA SLUA 

Aver PCT 

Data Adjusted 

average PCT 

EPA SLUA 

Max PCT 

Data 

Adjusted 

Max PCT 

Alfalfa 374,750 400,000 6.70% 5 5 5 5

Almonds 341,991 500,000 46.20% 30 21 40 27

Apples 414,600 400,000 -3.50% 55 57 65 67

Asparagus 22,104 20,000 -9.50% 25 28 40 44

Beans (Green)1 4119 3,000 27.20% 1 1 5 7

Broccoli 60,385 90,000 49.00% 45 30 55 37

Brussels 

Sprouts 6,000 n/a N/C n/a N/C n/a

Cabbage 8,797 10,000 13.70% 10 9 25 22

Cauliflower 15,239 20,000 31.20% 40 30 60 46

Cherries 80,140 60,000 -25.10% 30 40 40 53

Corn 2,617,432 3,000,000 14.60% 5 4 5 4

Cotton 285,350 200,000 -29.90% 1 1 5 7

Cranberries 50,000 n/a 70 n/a n/a

Cucumbers1 3,832 3,000 -21.70% 1 1 5 6

Dry 

Beans/Peas1

 3,033 4,000 31.90% 1 1 2.5 2

Figs 5,000 n/a N/C n/a N/C n/a

Grapefruit 54,855 60,000 9.40% 15 14 25 23

Grapes (Table) 60,428 100,000 65.50% 5 3 10 6

Grapes (Wine) 68,603 n/a 

-

100.00% 5 N/C 10 N/C 

Hazelnuts 7,286 7,000 -3.90% 15 16 20 21

Lemons 47,033 90,000 91.40% 35 18 55 29

Mint 50,000 n/a 25 n/a 25 n/a

Nectarines 20,000 n/a 20 n/a 30 

Onions 68,805 60,000 -12.80% 35 40 50 57

Oranges 241,735 300,000 24.10% 10 8 20 16

Peaches 69,853 70,000 0.20% 30 30 35 35

Peanuts 119,213 200,000 67.80% 5 3 10 6

Pears 29,564 30,000 1.50% 20 20 25 25

Peas1

(Fresh/Green/Sweet) 1,012 500 1 2 2.5 5

Pecans 296,596 300,000 1.20% 35 35 35 35

Peppers1 1,509 2,000 32.50% 1 1 5 4

Plums/Prunes 18,674 40,000 114.20% 15 7 20 9

Pumpkins 2,791 2,000 -28.30% 1 1 5 7

Sorghum 14,190 30,000 111.40% 1 0.5 2.5 1

Soybeans3 1,017,953 700,000 -31.20% 1 1 5 7

Strawberries 10,043 9,000 -10.40% 15 17 30 33
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 57 

Table 1. (cont.) Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA 

Major Crops 

 DAS 

Annual 

Usage 

 {lb ai} 

 EPA’s 

SLUA 

Estimate 

(Lb ai) 

 % Diff. 

EPA 

Estimate 

vs. 

Actual 

EPA SLUA 

Aver PCT

Data Adjusted 

average PCT

EPA SLUA 

Max PCT 

Data 

Adjusted 

Max PCT

Sugar Beets 138,020 100,000 -27.60% 10 14 15 21

Sunflowers 34,857 20,000 -42.60% 1 2 5 9

Sweet Corn 120,881 100,000 -17.30% 10 12 15 18

Sweet Potatoes 100,000 n/a 65 n/a NC n/a 

Tangelos 2,000 n/a 10 NC 10 NC 

Tangerines 6,000 n/a 10 NC 10 NC 

Tobacco 98,468 100,000 1.60% 15 15 15 15

Walnuts 195,505 400,000 104.60% 45 22 55 27

Wheat 288,751 300,000 3.90% 1 1 5 5
Table 2. Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with Tolerances 

Commoditya Year Unit N Detects 

Non 

Detects 

Percent 

Detects 

Max 

(ppm) 

Min 

(ppm) 

LOD 

average 

Almonds 07-08 B/1000 547 232 315 42% 0.0478 0.001 0.001 Apple Juice 07-08 M 740 0 740 0% - - 0.006265 Apple Sauce 06 M 714 0 714 0.0% - - 0.0020471 Apples 04-05 M 1487 17 1470 1.1% 0.016 0.002 0.001505 Asparagus 03-08 M 723 21 702 3% 0.48 0.003 0.0095030 Asparagus, Canned 03 M 354 6 348 2% 0.025 0.0063 0.003857062 Bananas 06-08 M 1486 3 1483 0.2% 0.0063 0.0063 0.003713 Broccoli 06-08 M 1475 108 1367 7.3% 0.038 0.002 0.0012 Butter 03 B/1000 732 1 731 0% 0.0027 0.0027 0.0016 Cauliflower 06-04 M 1484 8 1476 0.5% 0.01 0.002 0.001798 Cherries 07 M 419 0 419 0% - - 0.002730788 Corn Grain 06-08 M 1300 311 989 24% 0.008 0.002 0.001 Cranberries 06 M 316 71 245 22% 0.093 0.0049 0.004660759 Cucumbers 03-04 M 1296 25 1271 2% 0.038 0.007 0.004 Grapefruit 05-06 M 1485 24 1461 1.6% 0.0069 0.013 0.001727 Grape Juice 08 M 745 0 745 0% - - 0.00420953 Grapes 04-05 M 1477 180 1297 12.2% 0.32 0.0063 0.003858 Green Beans 07-08 M 1480 14 1466 0.9% 0.051 0.003 0.003428 Green Beans, Canned 04-03 M 928 0 928 0.0% - - 0.004710 Green Beans, Frozen 05 M 555 1 554 0.18% 0.007 0.007 0.004569369 
Table 2. (cont.) Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with Tolerances 

Commoditya Year Unit N Detects 

Non

Detects 

Percent 

Detects 

Max 

(ppm) 

Min

(ppm) 

LOD

average 

Greens, Kale 08-06 M 802 36 766 4.5% 1.1 0.0063 0.003854 Green Onions 08 M 186 2 184 1.1% 0.14 0.002 0.0012 Greens, Collardb 08-06 M 679 22 657 3.2% 6.3 0.0063 0.004148 Heavy Cream 07+05 B/1000 1111 0 1111 0% - - 0.001232 Honey 07-08 B/1000 744 1 743 0.1% 0.0013 0.0013 0.001 Kidney Beans, Canned 08 M 164 0 164 0% 0.000 0.000 0.017426829 Lettuce 04-05 M 1486 42 1444 2.8% 0.06 0.002 0.0020140 Milk 04-05 B/1000 1485 0 1485 0.0% - - 0.00017 Nectarines 07-08 M 1235 156 1079 12.6% 0.07 0.008 0.005 Onion 03 M 216 0 216 0% - - 0.01 Orange Juice 04-06 M 1487 4 1483 0.3% 0.007 0.007 0.004 Oranges 04-06 M 1483 34 1449 2.3% 0.017 0.007 0.004 Peaches 08-06 M 1261 218 1043 17.3% 0.19 0.003 0.006895 Peaches, Canned 04-03 M 1485 0 1485 0.0% - - 0.01 Peanut Butter 06 B/1000 739 0 739 0% - - 0.027 Pear Juice, Conc./Puree 03-02 M 66 0 66 0.0% - - 0.004 Pears 03-05 M 1483 33 1450 2.2% 0.041 0.0063 0.003372 Plums 06-05 M 1088 130 958 11.9% 0.18 0.005 0.005780 Plums, Dried (Prunes) 06-05 M 377 0 377 0.0% - - 0.005427 Pork Adipose 05 B/1000 352 1 351 0% 0.0025 0.0025 0.0015 Pork Muscle 05 B/1000 352 0 352 0% - - 0.00075 Poultry, Breast 06-07 B/1000 655 0 655 0.0% - - 0.0015 
Table 2. (cont.) Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with Tolerances 

Commoditya Year Unit N Detects 

Non

Detects 

Percent 

Detects 

Max 

(ppm) 

Min

(ppm) 

LOD

average 

Poultry, Thigh 06-07 B/1000 655 0 655 0.0% - - 0.0015 Raisins 06-07 B/1000 744 5 739 0.7% 0.022 0.007 0.00516129 Rice 08 M 182 0 182 0% - - 0.01 Soybean grain 03-05 B/1000 1263 272 991 21.5% 0.025 0.005 0.003 Strawberries 

04-05+08 M 2209 66 2143 3.0% 0.04 0.0013 0.002559 

Sweet Bell Peppers 03-04 M 1299 232 1067 17.9% 0.47 0.002 0.0012 Sweet Corn, Fresh 08 M 152 0 152 0% - - 0.014434211 Sweet Corn, Frozen 03+08 M 580 0 580 0.0% - - 0.004693 Sweet Peas, Frozen 03+06 M 1293 0 1293 0.0% - - 0.004027 Sweet Potatoes 

04-03+08 M 1639 165 1474 10.1% 0.084 0.0022 0.002142 

Water, Bottled 05-06 T/1000000 745 0 745 0.0% - - 0.00003 Water, Finished 03-08 T/1000000 1852 0 1852 0% - - 0.0000115 Water, Groundwater 07-08 T/1000000 522 0 522 0.0% - - 0.00003 Water, Untreated 04-08 T/1000000 1059 0 1059 0% - - 0.0000101 Wheat Flour 04-03 B/1000 1311 0 1311 0.0% - - 0.006 Wheat grain 04-06 B/1000 1361 8 1353 0.6% 0.042 0.01 0.006 Winter Squash 04-06 M 1464 27 1437 1.8% 0.029 0.0065 0.003929 

a PDP commodities without tolerances are not listed. b maximum value likely a mistransposition of ppb to ppm. 
Table 3. Relevant Commodities with Significant Import Contributions to Overall Detections in PDP Data 

Commodity 

Overall 

Detects 

(%) 

Domestic

Detects 

(%) 

Import 

Detects

(%) 

Domestic 

Total 

residue 

(%) 

Imported 

Total 

residue 

(%) 

Number of 

Import 

Observations 

Number of 

Domestic 

Observation 

US 

Population 

Consumption 

of Imports 

(%) 

Asparagus 3 1.93 3.31 6.00 94.00 513 207 57 Cucumbers 2 0.61 3.30 14.04 85.96 606 661 38 Grapes 12.2 1.97 23.17 3.37 96.63 712 761 54.4 Nectarines 12.6 1.12 34.67 3.76 96.24 424 806 9.1 Peaches 17.3 2.71 47.78 6.03 93.97 406 849 9.1 Pears 2.2 0.24 14.49 6.70 93.30 207 1265 20.8 Plums 11.9 3.03 25.94 5.91 94.09 424 659 7.4 Sweet Bell Peppers 17.9 2.75 55.46 7.21 92.79 366 908 34.1 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 62 

Table 4. Label Use Restrictions Applicable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from Lorsban®

Advanced Insecticide Label 

Section Specific Use Restrictions From Lorsban Advanced Label 

Tree Fruits and 

Tree Nuts. 

Dormant/Delayed 

Dormant 

Make only one application of Chlorpyrifos during the dormant season. Do not use 

more than 4 pints of Lorsban Advanced (1.88 lb ai Chlorpyrifos) per acre per season 

as a dormant/delayed dormant application. Do not make a soil or foliar application of 

Lorsban Advanced of products containing chlorpyrifos within 10 days of a 

dormant/delayed dormant application of chlorpyrifos to the orchard. 

Cherry, 

nectarine, 

Peach, and 

Almond Trunk 

Spray or preplant 

dip. 

Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, peaches and nectarines or 

within 21 days before harvest of cherries. Do not make more than one chlorpyrifos 

application per year in peaches and nectaries and no more than three chlorpyrifos 

applications per year in cherries. 

Tree Nuts. Foliar 

Sprays. 

Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, filberts and walnuts, or 28 

days before harvest of pecans. Do not make more than three total applications per 

season of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos to almonds, 

pecans and filberts and no more than two applications per season on walnuts. Do 

not apply more than a total of 8 pints of Lorsban Advanced (3.76 lb ai Chlorpyrifos) 

per acre per season as a foliar spray. Do not make a second application of Lorsban 

Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos within 10 days of the first 

application. 

Tree nut orchard 

floors 

Do not apply within 14 days before harvest. Do not make more than two applications 

of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos per season to the 

orchard floor. Do not apply more than a total of 8 pints of Lorsban Advanced (3.76 lb 

ai Chlorpyrifos) per acre per season to the orchard floor. Do not make a second 

application of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos within 10 

days of the first application. 

Apple Only one application of any chlorpyrifos containing product can be made per year. 

The application can be either a pre-bloom dormant/delayed dormant spray to the 

canopy or the trunk, or a post-bloom application to the lower 4 feet of the trunk [for 

post-bloom application instructions and restrictions on apple refer to Tree Fruits and 

Tree Nuts (Trunk Spray or Preplant Dip) section of the label. 

Pear Do not make more than one postharvest application (prior to dormancy) per year. 

Do not harvest or use treated fruit for food or feed. 

Peach and 

Nectarine 

Preplant Dip Application – For preplant control of peachborer, use Lorsban Advanced 

at the equivalent application rate of 3 quarts per 100 gallons of water. Dip trees 

several inches above the grafting bud scar and plant immediately or allow them to dry 

before returning to storage. Do not allow peach trees to remain in contact with the dip 

solution. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 63 

Table 4. (cont.) Label Use Restrictions Applicable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from 

Lorsban® Advanced Insecticide Label 

Tree Fruits and 

Tree Nuts 

Apply Lorsban Advanced to tree trunks and lower branches using a coarse, lowpressue spray to control pest listed in the following table. Use a higher rate in the rate 

range when there is increased pest pressure. Unless otherwise specificed, a second 

application may be made after two week and a third application may be made after 

harvest. 

For control of peach tree borer in established trees, apply before newly hatched 

borers enter the tree. Use as a coarse, low-pressue trunk spay and thoroughly wet all 

bark areas from ground level to scaffold limbs. Do not allow spray to contact fruit. 

Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, peaches and nectarines or 

withing 21 days before harvest of cherries. 

Do not make more than one chlorpyrifos application per year in peaches and 

nectarines and no more than three chlorpyrifos application per year in cherries. 

Cherries Avoid spray contact with foliage in sweet cherries as premature leaf drop may result. 

Grape Soil surface Application – Apply Lorsban Advanced just before the pest emerges from 

the soil. Apply 2 quarts of the diluted spray mixture to the soil surface on a 15-square 

foot area (4.4 ft circle) around the based of each vine. 

Do not allow spray to contact fruit of foliage. 

Prebloom Application – Apply as a spray drench ground application using a minimum 

spray volumen of 25 gpa. Do not use in conjunction with soil surface application for 

grape borer control. 

Do not apply within 35 days before harvest. Do not make more than one application 

per season of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos. 

Based on available residue data, the use of Lorsban Advanced in grapes is restricted 

to areas east of the Continental Divide only. 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 64 

Table 5. Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

APPLE 

2004 536 8 528 0.0012 0.67 PCT 

217 1 216 0.004 ZEROES 496 

2005 536 8 528 0.0012 1/2LOD 991 

215 0 215 0.004 DETECTS 17 

aver 

LOD 0.002012

TOTAL 1504 17 1487 1504 1/2LOD= 0.001006

 

APPLE JUICE 

2007 368 0 368 0.006272 0.67 PCT 

 ZEROES 121 

 1/2LOD 247 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.006272

TOTAL 368 0 368 368 1/2LOD= 0.003136

 

APPLE SAUCE 

2006 714 0 714 0.002047 0.67 CT 

 ZEROES 236 

 1/2LOD 478 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.002047

714 0 714 714 1/2LOD= 0.001024

 

ASPARAGUS imports 

2003+2008 513 17 496 0.011285 0.44 CT 

 ZEROES 287 

 1/2LOD 209 

 DETECTS 17 

aver 

LOD 0.011285

TOTAL 513 17 496 513 1/2LOD= 0.005642

 

ASPARAGUS domestic 

2003+2008 207 4 203 0.005088 0.44 CT 

 ZEROES 116 

 1/2LOD 87 

 DETECTS 4 

aver 

LOD 0.005088

TOTAL 207 4 203 207 1/2LOD= 0.002544
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 65 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

ASPARAGUS canned 

2003 354 6 348 0.004 0.44 CT 

 ZEROES 198 

 1/2LOD 150 

 DETECTS 6 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 354 6 348 354 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

BANANA 

2006-2008 1486 3 1483 0.003713 0.14 CT 

 0.0038 ZEROES 1278 

 0.004 1/2LOD 205 

 DETECTS 3 

aver 

LOD 0.003713

TOTAL 1486 3 1483 1486 1/2LOD= 0.001857

 

Green Beans 

2007-2008 1480 14 1466 0.003428 0.07 CT 

 ZEROES 1376 

 1/2LOD 90 

 DETECTS 14 

aver 

LOD 0.003428

TOTAL 1480 14 1466 1480 1/2LOD= 0.001714

 

Green Beans, Canned 

2003-2004 928 0 928 0.00471 0.07 CT 

 ZEROES 863 

 1/2LOD 65 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.00471

TOTAL 928 0 928 928 1/2LOD= 0.002355

 

Green Beans, Frozen 

2005 555 1 554 0.004569 0.07 CT 

 ZEROES 516 

 1/2LOD 38 

 DETECTS 1 

aver 

LOD 0.004569

TOTAL 555 1 554 555 1/2LOD= 0.002285
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 66 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Green Peas 

2007-2008 1480 14 1466 0.003428 0.05 CT 

 ZEROES 1406 

 1/2LOD 60 

 DETECTS 14 

aver 

LOD 0.003428

TOTAL 1480 14 1466 1480 1/2LOD= 0.001714

 

Sweet peas, frozen 

2007-2008 1293 0 1293 0.004027 0.05 CT 

 ZEROES 1228 

 1/2LOD 65 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.004027

TOTAL 1293 0 1293 1293 1/2LOD= 0.002014

 

Beef - PDP Adipose, Liver and Muscle 

2002 100 0 100 0.20 CT 

 ZEROES 80 

 1/2LOD 20 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.0028

TOTAL 100 0 100 100 1/2LOD= 0.0014

 

Beet Transalation of Sweet Potatoes PDP 

2003, 2004 and 

2008 1639 165 1474 0.002142 0.21 CT 

 ZEROES 1295 

 1/2LOD 179 

 DETECTS 165 

aver 

LOD 0.002142

TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071

 

Broccoli - PDP 

2006-08 1475 108 1367 0.37 CT 

 ZEROES 929 

 1/2LOD 438 

 DETECTS 108 

aver 

LOD 0.0012

TOTAL 1475 108 1367 1475 1/2LOD= 0.0006
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 67 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Brussel Sprout from Broccoli - PDP 

2006-08 1475 266 1209 0.91 CT 

ZEROES 133 

 1/2LOD 1077 

 DETECTS 266 

aver 

LOD 0.0012

TOTAL 1475 266 1209 1475 1/2LOD= 0.0006

 

Cauliflower - PDP 

04 05 06 1492 8 1484 0.0018 0.46 CT 

 ZEROES 806 

 1/2LOD 678 

 DETECTS 8 

aver 

LOD 0.001798

TOTAL 1492 8 1484 1492 1/2LOD= 0.000899

 

Cherry - PDP 2007 

2007 419 0 419 0.53 CT 

 ZEROES 197 

 1/2LOD 222 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.00273

419 0 419 419 1/2LOD= 0.001365

 

Collards- PDP 2006-2008 

2006-08 679 22 657 0.13 CT 

 ZEROES 591 

 1/2LOD 66 

 DETECTS 22 

aver 

LOD 0.004148

TOTAL 679 22 657 679 1/2LOD= 0.002074

 

Turnip Greens translation from Collards- PDP 2006-2008 

2006-08 679 22 657 0.19 CT 

adjusted 7 ZEROES 556 

 1/2LOD 101 

 DETECTS 29 

aver 

LOD 0.004148

TOTAL 686 29 657 686 1/2LOD= 0.002074
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 68 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Kale PDP 2006-2008 (also for mustard and rape) 

2006-08 802 36 766 0.05 CT 

 ZEROES 762 

 1/2LOD 4 

 DETECTS 36 

aver 

LOD 0.003855

TOTAL 802 36 766 802 1/2LOD= 0.001928

 

Corn, Sweet - 

2008 152 0 152 0.18 CT 

 ZEROES 125 

 1/2LOD 27 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.014434

TOTAL 152 0 152 152 1/2LOD= 0.007217

 

Corn, Sweet, frozen 

2008 and 03 580 0 580 0.18 CT 

 ZEROES 476 

 1/2LOD 104 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.004693

TOTAL 580 0 580 580 1/2LOD= 0.002347

 

Cranberries - PDP 2006 

316 71 245 0.70 CT 

 ZEROES 95 

 1/2LOD 150 

 0 DETECTS 71 

aver 

LOD 0.004661

TOTAL 316 71 245 316 1/2LOD= 0.00233

 

Cucumber -PDP 

2003 2004 1296 25 1271 0.06 CT 

 ZEROES 1218 

 1/2LOD 53 

 0 DETECTS 25 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1296 25 1271 1296 1/2LOD= 0.002
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 69 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Cucumber -PDP used for Pumpkin 

2003 2004 1296 25 1271 0.07 CT 

 ZEROES 1205 

 1/2LOD 66 

 0 DETECTS 25 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1296 25 1271 1296 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

Grape - PDP 2004 and 05 domestic 

2004/2005 761 15 746 0.06 CT 

 ZEROES 715 

1/2LOD 31 

 DETECTS 15 

aver 

LOD 0.003863

TOTAL 761 15 746 761 1/2LOD= 0.001932

 

Grape - PDP 2004 and 05 imports truncated to 0.01 for new tolerance 

2004/2005 712 165 547 1.00 CT 

 ZEROES 0 

1/2LOD 547 

 DETECTS 165 

aver 

LOD 0.003585

TOTAL 712 165 547 712 1/2LOD= 0.001793

 

Grape - raisin PDP data 

2006/2007 744 5 739 0.06 CT 

 ZEROES 699 

1/2LOD 40 

 DETECTS 5 

aver 

LOD 0.005161

TOTAL 744 5 739 744 1/2LOD= 0.002581

 

GrapeFruit PDP data 

1485 24 1461 0.23 CT 

 ZEROES 1143 

1/2LOD 318 

 DETECTS 24 

aver 

LOD 0.001727

TOTAL 1485 24 1461 1485 1/2LOD= 0.000863
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 70 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Lettuce PDP data - no use, but tolerance listed 

1486 42 1444 0.028 CT 

 ZEROES 1444 

1/2LOD 0 

 DETECTS 42 

aver 

LOD 0.002014

TOTAL 1486 42 1444 1486 1/2LOD= 0.001007

 

ORANGE - processed 

2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.004 0.09 CT 

 ZEROES 1350 

 1/2LOD 99 

 DETECTS 34 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

ORANGE - fresh 

2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.004 0.45 CT 

 ZEROES 816 

 1/2LOD 633 

 DETECTS 34 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

ORANGE -juice 

2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.09 CT 

 ZEROES 1353 

 1/2LOD 130 

 DETECTS 4 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

Peaches domestic 

2008/06 849 23 826 0.35 CT 

 ZEROES 552 

 1/2LOD 274 

 DETECTS 23 

aver 

LOD 0.008435

TOTAL 849 23 826 849 1⁄2LOD= 0.004217
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 71 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Peaches import 

2008/06 406 194 212 0.90 CT 

 ZEROES 41 

 1/2LOD 171 

 DETECTS 194 

aver 

LOD 0.003719

TOTAL 406 194 212 406 1/2LOD= 0.00186

 

Nectarines domestic 

2008/07 806 9 797 0.30 CT 

 ZEROES 564 

 1/2LOD 233 

 DETECTS 9 

aver 

LOD 0.005

TOTAL 806 9 797 806 1/2LOD= 0.0025

 

Nectarine import 

2008/07 424 147 277 0.75 CT 

 ZEROES 106 

 1/2LOD 171 

 DETECTS 147 

aver 

LOD 0.005

TOTAL 424 147 277 424 1/2LOD= 0.0025

 

Pears - PDP 

2008/07 1483 33 1450 0.25 CT 

 ZEROES 1112 

 1/2LOD 338 

 DETECTS 33 

aver 

LOD 0.003372

TOTAL 1483 33 1450 1483 1/2LOD= 0.001686

 

Sweet Peppers 

2003/04 1299 232 1067 0.20 CT 

 ZEROES 1039 

 1/2LOD 28 

 DETECTS 232 

aver 

LOD 0.0012

TOTAL 1299 232 1067 1299 1/2LOD= 0.0006
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 72 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Plums - PDP domestic 

2005-2006 659 20 639 0.09 CT 

 ZEROES 600 

 1/2LOD 39 

 DETECTS 20 

aver 

LOD 0.005618

TOTAL 659 20 639 659 1/2LOD= 0.002809

 

Plums - PDP imports 

2005-2006 424 110 314 0.30 CT 

 ZEROES 297 

 1/2LOD 17 

 DETECTS 110 

aver 

LOD 0.006031

TOTAL 424 110 314 424 1/2LOD= 0.003016

 

Plums, prunes dried - PDP 

2005 -2006 377 0 377 0.09 CT 

 ZEROES 343 

 1/2LOD 34 

 DETECTS 0 

aver 

LOD 0.005427

TOTAL 377 0 377 377 1/2LOD= 0.002714

 

Strawbery-PDP LOD 

2004-05+08 2209 66 2143 0.33 CT 

 ZEROES 1480 

 1/2LOD 663 

 DETECTS 66 

aver 

LOD 0.00256

TOTAL 2209 66 2143 2209 1/2LOD= 0.00128

 

Sweet Potatoe-PDP LOD 

2004-03+08 1639 165 1474 0.65 CT 

 ZEROES 574 

 1/2LOD 900 

 DETECTS 165 

aver 

LOD 0.002142

TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 73 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Radish from Sweet Potatoe-PDP LOD 

2004-03+08 1639 165 1474 0.19 CT 

 ZEROES 1328 

 1/2LOD 146 

 DETECTS 165 

aver 

LOD 0.002142

TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071

 

Almonds PDP LOD 

2007-08 547 232 315 0.43 CT 

 ZEROES 312 

 1/2LOD 3 

 DETECTS 232 

aver 

LOD 0.001

TOTAL 547 232 315 547 1/2LOD= 0.0005

 

Almonds PDP used for walnuts LOD 

2007-08 547 232 315 0.55 CT 

 ZEROES 246 

 1/2LOD 69 

 DETECTS 232 

aver 

LOD 0.001

TOTAL 547 232 315 547 1/2LOD= 0.0005

 

Almonds PDP adjusted for hazelnuts LOD 

2007-08 1160 232 928 0.20 CT 

 ZEROES 928 

 1/2LOD 0 

 DETECTS 232 

aver 

LOD 0.001

TOTAL 1160 232 928 1160 1/2LOD= 0.0005

 

Almonds PDP adjusted for pecans LOD 

2007-08 663 232 431 0.35 CT 

 ZEROES 431 

 1/2LOD 0 

 DETECTS 232 

aver 

LOD 0.001

TOTAL 663 232 431 663 1/2LOD= 0.0005
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 74 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

ORANGE - fresh translated to other tangerine, and citrons 

2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.10 CT 

 ZEROES 1335 

 1/2LOD 114 

 DETECTS 34 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

ORANGE -juice translated to tangerine and citrons 

2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.10 CT 

 ZEROES 1338 

 1/2LOD 145 

 DETECTS 4 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

ORANGE - fresh translated to lime and lemon 

2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.29 CT 

 ZEROES 1053 

 1/2LOD 396 

 DETECTS 34 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

ORANGE -juice translated to lime and lemon 

2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.29 CT 

 ZEROES 1056 

 1/2LOD 427 

 DETECTS 4 

aver 

LOD 0.004

TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

 

Cabbage -2004-2007-FDA 

2004/07 255 3 252 0.22 CT 

 ZEROES 199 

 1/2LOD 53 

 DETECTS 3 

aver 

LOD 0.005

TOTAL 255 3 252 255 1/2LOD= 0.0025
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 75 

Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction 

PDP Year Used 

Sample 

N 

 # 

Detects 

 Count 

LOD 

 LOD 

value RDF File 

Chinese Cabbage -2004-2007-FDA 

2004/07 255 3 252 0.05 CT 

 ZEROES 242 

 1/2LOD 10 

 DETECTS 3 

aver 

LOD 0.005

TOTAL 255 3 252 255 1/2LOD= 0.0025
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 76 

Appendix A—DATA to Support Percentage of Imported Commodities Consumed by 

US Population 
Data from USDA FAO PSD (29) summarized to use four year averages to calculate conservative percent import on percentage of imports in total domestic consumption for peaches, nectarines, plums, grapes and pears. Due to processed asparagus, the percent import consumption for fresh asparagus was calculated based on percentage of 

supply. 

Commodity Attribute Country 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 4 year average Fresh Peaches & Nectarines Production (MT) United States 1,105,994 1,269,061 1,302,563 1,194,354 1,217,993 

Imports (MT) United States 60,460 59,688 67,440 54,000 60,397 

 Total Supply (MT) United States 1,166,454 1,328,749 1,370,003 1,248,354 1,278,390 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (MT) United States 621,336 611,313 720,445 688,354 660,362

 Exports (MT) United States 86,400 105,359 120,034 100,000 102,948 

For Processing (MT) United States 458,718 612,077 529,524 460,000 515,080 

 Total Distribution (MT) United States 1,166,454 1,328,749 1,370,003 1,248,354 1,278,390 
Commodity Attribute Country 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 4 year average % of imp

consum

Fresh Plums & Prunes Production (MT) United States 684,920 352,895 381,120 0 354,734 

Imports (MT) United States 30,980 35,630 36,600 0 25,803 7

Total Supply (MT) United States 715,900 388,525 417,720 0 380,536 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (MT) United States 666,600 346,565 375,720 0 347,221

Exports, Fresh (MT) United States 49,300 41,960 42,000 0 33,315 

Total Distribution (MT) United States 715,900 388,525 417,720 0 380,536 

Commodity Attribute Country 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 4 year average % of import consumptionGrapes, Fresh 

Production (MT) 

United States 723,561 834,909 893,758 828,000 820,057 

Imports (MT) 

United States 586,025 569,298 625,616 660,000 610,235 54.4%

Total Supply (MT) 

United States 1,309,586 1,404,207 1,519,374 1,488,000 1,430,292 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (MT) 

United States 1,035,473 1,103,299 1,183,329 1,165,000 1,121,775 

 Exports (MT) 

United States 274,113 300,908 336,045 323,000 308,517 

Total Distribution (MT) 

United States 1,309,586 1,404,207 1,519,374 1,488,000 1,430,292 
Commodity Attribute Country 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 4 year average % of import consumptionPears, Fresh 

Production (MT) 

United States 754,000 791,000 789,200 848,000 795,550 

Imports (MT) 

United States 107,409 85,837 83,947 85,000 90,548 20.8%

Total Supply (MT) 

United States 861,409 876,837 873,147 933,000 886,098 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (MT) 

United States 434,557 425,062 432,690 448,123 435,108 

 Exports (MT) 

United States 127,115 161,564 150,200 165,000 150,970 

For Processing (MT) 

United States 299,737 290,211 290,257 319,877 300,021 

Total Distribution (MT) 

United States 861,409 876,837 873,147 933,000 886,098 

Commodity Attribute Country 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 4 year average % of import from total supply Asparagus, Fresh 

Production (MT) 

United States 81,830 83,000 0 82,415 

Imports (MT) 

United States 108,321 109,000 0 108,661 56.9%

Total Supply (MT) 

United States 190,151 192,000 0 191,076 

Exports, Fresh (MT) 

United States 10,268 12,300 0 11,284 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (MT) 

United States 154,574 15,500 0 85,037 

For Processing (MT) 

United States 25,309 164,200 0 94,755 

Total Distribution (MT) 

United States 190,151 192,000 0 191,076 
Commodity Attribute 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 

Raisins Beginning Stocks (MT) 250,000 230,000 180,000

Production (MT) 316,245 280,502 316,525

Imports (MT) 21,614 24,791 22,000

Total Supply (MT) 587,859 535,293 518,525

 Exports (MT) 109,500 115,565 120,000

Domestic Consumption (MT) 248,359 239,728 260,000

 Ending Stocks (MT) 230,000 180,000 138,525

Total Distribution (MT) 587,859 535,293 518,525% Import of Consumption 8.7% 10.3% 8.5% 

Oranges, Fresh 

Production (1000 MT) 

United States 9,141 8,344 7444 8,310

Imports (1000 MT) 

United States 77 90 110 92

Total Supply (1000 MT) 

United States 9,218 8,434 7554 8,402 

Exports (1000 MT) 

United States 613 494 525 544 

Fresh Dom. Consumption (1000 MT) 

United States 1,406 1,314 1377 1,366 

For Processing (1000 MT) 

United States 7,199 6,626 5652 6,492 77%

<-percent total supply that is processed 

Total Distribution (1000 MT) 

United States 9,218 8,434 7554 8,402 
Data from USDA’s ERS data (30) Table 1--U.S. bell peppers, all uses: Supply, utilization, and price, farm weight, 

derive % of consumed imports.

Year 

Fresh 

Imports 

Domestic 

Use 

percent imports consumed 

2005 652.574 2099.8 31.1 2006 716.143 2100.68 34.2 2007 prelim 726.412 2041.32 35.6 2008 forcast 740 2080 35.6 

4 yr average 708.7825 2080.451 34.1 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 82 

Appendix B—RDF Residue files prepared for DEEM 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 83 

Almond PDP RFD 10 

ALMOND doc 43 PCT implies 

TOTALNZ= 232 

TOTALLOD = 3 LODRES = 0.0005 doc 

TOTALZ = 312 doc 

0.001043 

0.00584 

0.010832 

0.00104 

0.0019 

0.0011 

0.0014 

0.001116 

0.0133 

0.001378 

0.0023 

0.0058 

0.0019 

0.0017 

0.0016 

0.022078 

0.00365 

0.0069 

0.005672 

0.001146 

0.00148 

0.002 

0.003581 

0.00101 

0.001343 

0.003194 

0.003137 

0.001511 

0.0014 

0.0076 

0.001 

0.0018 

0.00218 

0.0036 

0.002 

0.002048 

0.0015 

0.00514 

0.002 

0.001437 

0.001131 

0.0041 

0.0064 

0.0108 

0.0041 

0.006695 

0.007489 

0.002634 

0.0103 

0.002581 

0.0017 

0.001816 

0.0019 

0.0029 

0.0033 

0.0015 

0.001079 

0.0034 

0.0155 

0.001904 

0.001143 

0.003604 

0.0028 

0.007168 

0.00333 

0.0013 

0.001552 

0.002073 

0.004466 

0.0035 

0.00659 

0.0013 

0.0019 

0.00197 

0.001354 

0.004317 

0.0021 

0.004657 

0.00543 

0.0021 

0.004919 

0.011711 

0.001 

0.0036 

0.002718 

0.009486 

0.002 

0.00269 

0.005 

0.0025 

0.00687 

0.00302 

0.0024 

0.00147 

0.004361 

0.006643 

0.0059 

0.008 

0.0076 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0026 

0.001478 

0.001065 

0.024804 

0.006787 

0.002606 

0.0013 

0.00277 

0.004791 

0.002425 

0.009487 

0.001334 

0.0027 

0.001 

0.014108 

0.0027 

0.0023 

0.00155 

0.001402 

0.006159 

0.004858 

0.0151 

0.0036 

0.007305 

0.008964 

0.002639 

0.004611 

0.002837 

0.009427 

0.002167 

0.002433 

0.001966 

0.002151 

0.001522 

0.009372 

0.011869 

0.005716 

0.002388 

0.006403 

0.002161 

0.003205 

0.009631 

0.005017 

0.0023 

0.0045 

0.0478 

0.0011 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0123 

0.0038 

0.0072 

0.0015 

0.0025 

0.0055 

0.0057 

0.0028 

0.0014 

0.0012 

0.0016 

0.0089 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0011 

0.0031 

0.0016 

0.0021 

0.001 

0.0027 

0.0045 

0.0016 

0.0015 

0.0022 

0.0021 

0.0018 

0.0035 

0.0011 

0.0017 

0.0024 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0011 

0.0073 

0.0033 

0.0016 

0.0034 

0.0043 

0.0012 

0.0015 

0.0017 

0.0011 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 84 

0.0037 

0.0071 

0.006992 

0.002519 

0.001334 

0.001596 

0.001341 

0.001014 

0.00145 

0.0024 

0.005338 

0.004154 

0.014389 

0.006322 

0.0018 

0.007 

0.00677 

0.0068 

0.0017 

0.003027 

0.00492 

0.00387 

0.0138 

0.0082 

0.0021 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0012 

0.0031 

0.0037 

0.0234 

0.0043 

0.0042 

0.0013 

0.0108 

0.0013 

0.0023 

0.0011 

0.0032 

0.0021 

APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf 

APPLES doc assume 67 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 247 LODRES = 0.003136 

TOTALZ = 121 doc 

APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf 

APPLE Sauce doc assume 67 PCT 

TOTALLOD = 478 

LODRES = 0.0001024 

TOTALZ = 236 doc 

APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf 

APPLES doc assume 67 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 17 

TOTALLOD = 991 LODRES = 0.001006 

TOTALZ = 496 doc 

0.002 

0.0072 

0.002 

0.007 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.016 

0.0057 

0.002 

0.013 

0.01 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0087 

0.0076 

Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf 

ASPARAGUS doc at imports use 44 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 17 

TOTALLOD = 209 LODRES = 0.005642 

TOTALZ = 287 doc 

0.0063 

0.039 

0.06 

0.018 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.0084 

0.48 

0.028 

0.003 

0.019 

0.012 

0.078 

0.003 

0.015 

0.02 

0.13 

Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf 

ASPARAGUS doc 44 PCT domestic 

TOTALNZ = 4 

TOTALLOD = 87 LODRES = 0.002544 

TOTALZ = 116 doc this is for 44 PCT 

0.0063 

0.021 

0.0063 

0.026 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 85 

Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf 

ASPARAGUS doc 44 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 6 

TOTALLOD = 150 LODRES = 0.002 doc half the LOD = 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1198 doc 

0.0063 

0.017 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.025 

Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf 

BANANA doc 2006-2008 PDP data 

TOTALNZ = 3 

TOTALLOD = 205 LODRES = 0.00186 

TOTALZ = 1278 doc this is for 14 PCT exposure 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

Beef PDP 37.rdf 

Beef doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 20 LODRES = 0.0014 

TOTALZ = 80 doc 

Broccoli PDP 17.rdf 

BROCCOLI doc 2006-2008 with 37 PCT, 

TOTALNZ = 108 

TOTALLOD = 438 LODRES = 0.0006 doc half the averaged LOD 

TOTALZ = 929 doc 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0058 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0048 

0.002 

0.006 

0.002 

0.0044 

0.0051 

0.011 

0.0093 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0057 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.017 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0073 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0072 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0062 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0083 

0.002 

0.002 

0.02 

0.002 

0.0049 

0.005 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0055 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0065 

0.002 

0.038 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.002 

0.036 

0.002 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 86 

0.002 

0.014 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0056 

0.0071 

0.002 

0.0084 

Brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf 

BRUSSEL SPROUTS doc using BEAD 2000 91 PCT translated from broccoli 

TOTALNZ = 266 

TOTALLOD = 1077 LODRES = 0.0006 

TOTALZ = 133 doc 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0058 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0048 

0.002 

0.006 

0.002 

0.0044 

0.0051 

0.011 

0.0093 

0.002 

0.014 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0057 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.017 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.02 

0.002 

0.0049 

0.005 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0056 

0.0071 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0055 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0065 

0.002 

0.038 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.002 

0.036 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0084 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.014 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0057 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.017 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0073 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0072 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0062 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0083 

0.002 

0.002 

0.02 

0.002 

0.0049 

0.005 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0065 

0.002 

0.038 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.002 

0.036 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0084 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 87 

0.002 

0.0073 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0072 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0062 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0083 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0058 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0048 

0.002 

0.006 

0.002 

0.0044 

0.0051 

0.011 

0.0093 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0056 

0.0071 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0055 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.012 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

0.00426 

Cabbage FDA 22.rdf 

Cabbage doc 22 PCT and FDA data on cabbage 

TOTALNZ = 3 

TOTALLOD = 53 LODRES = 0.0025 doc half the LOD = 0.005 based on 302 FDA 

method 

TOTALZ = 199 doc 

0.002 

0.4 

0.012 

canned green beans PDP 43.rdf 

Beans canned doc 7PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 65 LODRES = 0.002355 

TOTALZ = 863 doc 

Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf 

Canned peach doc 35 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 35 LODRES = 0.005 

TOTALZ = 65 doc 

Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf 

Cauliflower doc using 46 PCT and 04 05 and 06 PDP data 

TOTALNZ = 8 

TOTALLOD = 678 LODRES = 0.0009 doc half the average LOD method 

TOTALZ = 806 doc 

0.002 

0.0096 

0.007 

0.0048 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

Cherry PDP 33.rdf 

Cherry doc 53 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 222 LODRES = 0.001365 doc based on 2007 PDP 

TOTALZ = 197 

Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf 

Chinese cabbage doc 5 PCT 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 88 

TOTALNZ = 3 

TOTALLOD = 10 LODRES = 0.0025 doc half the LOD = 0.005 based on 302 FDA 

method 

TOTALZ = 242 doc 

0.002 

0.04 

0.012 

Collard PDP 20.rdf 

Collard doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 13 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 22 

TOTALLOD = 66 LODRES = 0.002074 

TOTALZ = 591 doc 

0.0065 

0.035 

0.025 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

6.3 

0.034 

0.44 

0.007 

0.015 

0.007 

0.24 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.025 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.033 

0.0063 

Corn PDP 34.rdf 

Corn grain doc 23 PCT based on observed residues 

TOTALNZ = 195 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc based on 2007 PDP 

TOTALZ = 455 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.004 

0.003 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.005 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.006 

0.003 

0.003 

0.004 

0.003 

0.004 

0.003 

0.005 

0.003 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.003 

0.005 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.003 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.005 

0.004 

0.006 

0.003 

0.006 

0.004 

0.004 

0.005 

0.006 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.004 

0.005 

0.004 

0.003 

0.004 

0.008 

0.005 

0.003 

0.003 

0.005 

0.005 

0.003 

0.004 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.003 

0.004 

0.004 

0.003 

0.002 

0.004 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.005 

0.005 

0.004 

0.005 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.004 

0.002 

0.006 

0.007 

0.004 

0.008 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.005 

0.004 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 89 

0.002 

0.003 

0.004 

0.004 

0.002 

0.003 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.005 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.004 

0.008 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.004 

0.005 

0.003 

0.005 

0.003 

0.004 

0.002 

0.005 

0.004 

0.005 

0.003 

0.003 

0.006 

0.003 

0.003 

0.002 

0.004 

0.002 

0.003 

0.004 

0.002 

0.002 

0.005 

0.008 

0.006 

0.006 

0.004 

0.006 

0.005 

0.004 

0.005 

0.004 

0.007 

0.005 

0.008 

0.004 

0.003 

0.004 

0.005 

Cranberry PDP 16.rdf 

Cranberry doc 70 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 71 

TOTALLOD = 150 LODRES = 0.002347 doc based on weighted average 

TOTALZ = 95 

0.032 

0.014 

0.0052 

0.028 

0.093 

0.02 

0.0067 

0.034 

0.033 

0.0075 

0.061 

0.032 

0.02 

0.027 

0.007 

0.0097 

0.014 

0.046 

0.013 

0.018 

0.015 

0.0068 

0.01 

0.021 

0.068 

0.026 

0.014 

0.007 

0.0081 

0.018 

0.005 

0.007 

0.024 

0.032 

0.026 

0.0067 

0.0086 

0.058 

0.025 

0.023 

0.027 

0.026 

0.04 

0.069 

0.038 

0.029 

0.02 

0.035 

0.047 

0.088 

0.019 

0.025 

0.09 

0.0062 

0.0052 

0.0053 

0.037 

0.0049 

0.021 

0.027 

0.0058 

0.0067 

0.0074 

0.0077 

0.013 

0.027 

0.012 

0.057 

0.007 

0.03 

0.026 

Cucumber PDP 53.rdf 

Cucumber doc using 6 

TOTALNZ = 25 

TOTALLOD = 53 LODRES = 0.002 doc 

TOTALZ = 1218 doc 

0.036 

0.038 

0.016 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.037 

0.007 

0.007 

0.03 

0.007 

0.007 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.12 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.026 

0.007 

Eggs 48 EPA.rdf 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 90 

Poultry eggs doc using acute using BEAD 2000 RDF procedure 

TOTALNZ = 10 

TOTALLOD = 0 

TOTALZ = 90 doc 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

0.000105 

Fig tolerance 41.rdf 

Fig doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 1 PCT and tolerance 

TOTALNZ = 1 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0025 

TOTALZ = 99 doc 

0.01 

Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf 

Filbert doc 20 PCT 

TOTALNZ= 232 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc 

TOTALZ = 928 doc 

0.001043 

0.00584 

0.010832 

0.00104 

0.0019 

0.0011 

0.0014 

0.001116 

0.0133 

0.001378 

0.0023 

0.0058 

0.0019 

0.0017 

0.0016 

0.022078 

0.00365 

0.0069 

0.005672 

0.001146 

0.00148 

0.002 

0.003581 

0.00101 

0.001343 

0.003194 

0.003137 

0.001511 

0.0014 

0.0076 

0.001 

0.0018 

0.00218 

0.0036 

0.002 

0.002048 

0.0103 

0.002581 

0.0017 

0.001816 

0.0019 

0.0029 

0.0033 

0.0015 

0.001079 

0.0034 

0.0155 

0.001904 

0.001143 

0.003604 

0.0028 

0.007168 

0.00333 

0.0013 

0.001552 

0.002073 

0.004466 

0.0035 

0.00659 

0.0013 

0.0019 

0.00197 

0.001354 

0.004317 

0.0021 

0.004657 

0.00543 

0.0021 

0.004919 

0.011711 

0.001 

0.0036 

0.0059 

0.008 

0.0076 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0026 

0.001478 

0.001065 

0.024804 

0.006787 

0.002606 

0.0013 

0.00277 

0.004791 

0.002425 

0.009487 

0.001334 

0.0027 

0.001 

0.014108 

0.0027 

0.0023 

0.00155 

0.001402 

0.006159 

0.004858 

0.0151 

0.0036 

0.007305 

0.008964 

0.002639 

0.004611 

0.002837 

0.009427 

0.002167 

0.002433 

0.0023 

0.0045 

0.0478 

0.0011 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0123 

0.0038 

0.0072 

0.0015 

0.0025 

0.0055 

0.0057 

0.0028 

0.0014 

0.0012 

0.0016 

0.0089 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0011 

0.0031 

0.0016 

0.0021 

0.001 

0.0027 

0.0045 

0.0016 

0.0015 

0.0022 

0.0021 

0.0018 

0.0035 

0.0011 

0.0017 

0.0024 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 91 

0.0015 

0.00514 

0.002 

0.001437 

0.001131 

0.0041 

0.0064 

0.0108 

0.0041 

0.006695 

0.007489 

0.002634 

0.0037 

0.0071 

0.006992 

0.002519 

0.001334 

0.001596 

0.001341 

0.001014 

0.00145 

0.0024 

0.002718 

0.009486 

0.002 

0.00269 

0.005 

0.0025 

0.00687 

0.00302 

0.0024 

0.00147 

0.004361 

0.006643 

0.005338 

0.004154 

0.014389 

0.006322 

0.0018 

0.007 

0.00677 

0.0068 

0.0017 

0.003027 

0.001966 

0.002151 

0.001522 

0.009372 

0.011869 

0.005716 

0.002388 

0.006403 

0.002161 

0.003205 

0.009631 

0.005017 

0.00492 

0.00387 

0.0138 

0.0082 

0.0021 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0012 

0.0031 

0.0037 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0011 

0.0073 

0.0033 

0.0016 

0.0034 

0.0043 

0.0012 

0.0015 

0.0017 

0.0011 

0.0234 

0.0043 

0.0042 

0.0013 

0.0108 

0.0013 

0.0023 

0.0011 

0.0032 

0.0021 

Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf 

Frozen Green beans doc 7 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 1 

TOTALLOD = 38 LODRES = 0.002285 

TOTALZ = 516 doc 

0.007 

Frozen peas PDP 98.rdf 

Frozen Pea doc 5 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 65 LODRES = 0.002014 

TOTALZ = 1228 

Frozen sweet corn PDP 96.rdf 

Corn doc 18 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 104 LODRES = 0.002347 doc based on 2007 PDP 

TOTALZ = 476 

Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf 

Grape doc using 6 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 15 

TOTALLOD = 31 LODRES = 0.001932 

TOTALZ = 715 doc 

0.031 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.091 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Grape imports PDP 94.rdf 

Grape doc using 100 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 165 

TOTALLOD = 547 LODRES = 0.001793 

TOTALZ = 0 doc 

0.0063 0.0063 0.01 0.01 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 92 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf 

Grape fruit Juice doc BEAD said 16 PCT ; may TAT/AVG is .21 

TOTALNZ = 6 

TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1252 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf 

Grape fruit doc 23 PCT PDP 2005 and 2006 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 93 

TOTALNZ = 24 

TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.000863 doc cut to half the average LOD 

TOTALZ = 1143 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0036 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0069 

0.0029 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

5B green PDP 21.rdf 

5b greens doc using PCT 1 and collard PDP 2006 and 2007 

TOTALNZ = 14 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.002155 

TOTALZ = 1386 doc 

0.0065 

0.035 

0.025 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.034 

0.44 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.015 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.0063 

6.3 

Green beans PDP 42.rdf 

Green beans doc 7 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 14 

TOTALLOD = 90 LODRES = 0.001714 

TOTALZ = 1376 doc 

0.003 

0.04 

0.0063 

0.045 

0.026 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.013 

0.003 

0.011 

0.015 

0.0063 

0.015 

0.051 

Kale PDP 40.rdf 

Kale doc PCT of 5 

TOTALNZ = 36 

TOTALLOD = 4 

LODRES = 0.001928 doc half the averaged LOD 

TOTALZ = 762 

0.0065 

0.067 

0.039 

0.024 

0.017 

0.007 

0.007 

0.033 

0.03 

0.007 

0.045 

0.0063 

0.039 

0.021 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.1 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.12 

0.007 

0.12 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.02 

0.007 

0.007 

0.45 

1.1 

0.0063 

0.018 

0.017 

Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf 

Kidney Bean doc 2 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 2 LODRES = 0.00871 

TOTALZ = 98 

KIWI FDA 19.rdf 

Kiwi doc BEAD previous actue decomp file page 125 

TOTALNZ = 1000 

TOTALLOD = 2971 LODRES = 0.0015 

TOTALZ = 3972 

0.005774 0.000468 0.013806 0.001581 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 94 

0.027184 

0.004571 

0.035461 

0.002448 

0.000753 

0.84161 

2.81E-05 

0.83797 

0.013271 

0.001038 

0.022625 

0.000126 

0.001777 

0.005308 

0.00206 

0.001703 

0.000276 

0.024086 

0.041189 

0.026324 

0.004259 

0.005224 

0.044722 

0.006386 

0.003652 

0.084632 

0.000108 

0.003449 

0.000212 

0.066089 

0.336373 

0.014716 

0.009631 

0.491528 

0.120732 

23.78547 

0.023165 

7.04E-05 

0.63505 

0.611888 

0.003536 

0.026041 

0.000539 

0.059298 

0.220776 

0.001386 

0.049039 

0.004901 

0.006178 

0.019393 

0.052346 

0.028844 

0.123647 

0.1896 

0.006046 

0.013404 

0.070856 

0.108509 

0.046543 

0.062815 

0.073651 

0.057156 

0.007888 

0.068534 

0.000484 

0.007221 

0.003481 

0.004107 

0.02208 

0.008831 

0.097544 

0.072456 

0.031915 

0.000444 

0.053661 

0.127232 

0.001855 

0.006428 

0.003763 

0.019862 

0.002308 

0.00233 

0.022121 

0.037896 

0.068363 

0.034925 

0.010517 

0.184119 

0.019292 

0.00597 

0.005189 

0.206363 

0.049369 

0.003388 

0.01119 

0.011044 

0.02959 

0.133957 

0.046109 

1.334883 

0.001918 

0.009031 

0.015104 

0.175101 

0.004028 

0.002095 

0.007134 

0.036936 

0.012333 

0.048255 

0.063714 

0.001278 

0.0891 

0.00023 

0.007371 

0.045767 

0.001881 

0.003438 

0.134033 

0.00105 

0.044449 

0.012377 

0.028597 

0.002474 

0.094791 

0.005478 

0.016953 

0.003704 

0.244348 

0.038217 

0.001965 

0.046429 

0.028386 

0.021329 

0.0005 

0.003604 

0.111376 

0.004641 

0.00383 

2.12E-05 

0.000826 

0.004117 

0.013626 

0.001702 

0.004016 

0.004853 

0.010665 

0.008679 

0.033272 

0.017225 

0.163458 

0.026794 

0.034629 

0.05281 

0.027181 

0.001829 

0.026145 

0.196218 

0.011898 

0.009324 

0.048696 

0.008555 

0.002048 

0.011716 

0.037802 

0.000264 

0.041964 

0.092128 

0.021056 

0.084087 

0.002136 

0.000924 

0.000733 

0.214337 

0.000298 

0.065975 

0.024662 

0.056538 

1.011748 

1.7618 

0.002159 

0.013035 

0.065461 

0.015675 

0.014428 

0.001254 

0.848811 

0.004985 

0.007478 

0.001472 

0.422689 

0.000403 

0.014053 

0.009151 

0.032925 

128.3317 

0.016248 

0.239077 

0.411628 

0.013774 

0.010442 

0.086356 

0.358619 

0.021734 

0.004532 

0.000256 

0.004441 

0.062013 

0.370049 

0.00475 

0.000604 

0.085433 

0.001907 

0.002918 

0.016717 

0.002194 

0.003109 

0.053359 

0.001028 

0.003636 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 95 

0.012665 

0.014835 

0.199358 

0.007321 

0.003853 

0.017472 

0.007671 

0.005361 

0.05431 

0.00038 

0.005034 

0.000799 

0.000835 

0.002162 

0.136703 

0.003005 

0.008478 

0.074334 

0.083874 

0.003952 

0.116016 

0.016045 

0.007108 

0.033783 

0.000651 

0.169918 

0.001484 

0.005871 

0.780379 

0.105937 

0.01873 

0.266527 

2.556982 

0.040614 

0.10389 

0.000725 

0.131296 

0.055872 

0.000191 

0.010692 

0.002133 

1.836604 

0.216155 

0.250234 

0.037401 

0.897839 

0.002222 

0.012037 

0.016395 

0.002615 

0.009384 

0.001879 

0.297859 

0.143662 

0.004806 

0.014046 

0.027332 

0.020683 

0.026756 

0.023862 

0.003107 

0.194591 

9.6E-05 

0.009177 

0.0101 

0.052613 

0.001675 

0.08643 

0.002186 

0.021077 

0.076479 

0.359973 

0.006578 

1.589949 

0.027638 

0.006508 

0.000175 

0.001343 

0.001992 

0.04695 

0.078468 

0.384877 

0.09526 

0.00157 

0.015649 

0.002959 

0.040394 

3.33E-05 

0.002844 

0.152789 

0.228838 

0.045578 

0.00113 

0.010823 

0.032578 

0.006867 

0.157636 

0.000974 

0.009976 

0.018867 

0.004071 

0.005943 

0.025243 

0.001225 

0.030743 

0.000571 

0.001184 

0.001042 

0.080838 

0.006926 

0.014383 

0.003086 

0.627758 

0.030033 

5.97E-05 

0.000454 

0.010087 

0.057456 

0.454784 

0.060748 

0.03254 

0.007646 

0.000429 

0.079262 

0.167215 

0.30525 

0.129024 

0.096597 

4.444398 

0.005034 

0.000683 

0.335997 

0.020029 

0.023868 

0.012091 

0.01525 

0.017724 

0.266258 

0.006163 

0.022487 

1.526111 

0.017022 

0.009667 

0.569971 

0.069528 

0.189745 

0.027342 

0.054053 

0.001401 

0.024153 

0.002311 

0.000215 

0.757058 

0.058969 

1.151228 

0.023072 

0.043264 

0.008324 

0.059032 

0.003365 

0.002948 

0.090039 

0.002243 

0.175849 

1.219522 

0.018592 

0.060118 

0.000554 

0.024295 

0.012922 

0.066729 

0.019152 

0.044098 

0.020807 

0.013328 

0.003168 

0.022602 

0.001619 

0.003222 

0.016459 

0.008138 

0.298475 

0.080253 

0.007065 

0.026115 

0.000584 

0.048012 

0.004812 

0.035892 

0.950824 

0.041364 

8.1E-05 

0.008071 

0.00415 

0.007996 

0.051889 

0.000182 

0.152832 

0.01986 

0.235122 

0.007398 

0.33539 

3.415169 

0.08817 

0.006641 

0.002492 

0.031927 

0.064633 

0.145574 

0.006777 

0.034851 

0.097258 

0.116582 

0.169218 

0.011155 

0.0011 

0.037118 

0.000479 

0.006482 

0.003383 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 96 

0.002424 

0.04205 

0.033506 

0.000326 

0.03913 

0.001093 

0.013848 

0.1809 

0.060928 

0.005086 

0.0005 

0.419004 

0.000779 

0.000157 

0.009302 

0.001159 

0.030598 

6.009815 

0.029434 

0.164084 

0.067058 

0.041959 

0.043791 

0.00095 

0.21174 

0.076189 

0.001462 

0.015524 

0.006288 

0.050072 

0.014907 

0.005525 

0.278437 

0.063954 

0.012851 

0.011711 

0.14022 

0.017999 

0.012481 

0.239469 

0.000297 

0.10069 

0.006796 

0.001832 

0.54245 

0.101544 

0.000198 

0.000353 

0.001946 

0.055062 

0.004518 

0.003241 

3.903866 

0.072268 

0.008098 

0.047519 

0.000421 

0.008721 

0.018364 

0.058807 

0.160119 

0.17892 

0.129039 

0.002773 

0.014359 

0.563994 

0.000412 

0.003321 

0.002523 

0.03838 

0.020777 

0.454092 

0.000251 

0.168646 

0.043246 

0.09163 

0.081475 

0.000811 

0.002679 

0.011596 

0.402851 

0.036725 

0.004853 

0.034728 

0.013605 

0.137768 

0.004173 

0.079601 

0.004355 

0.320794 

6.4E-05 

0.000999 

1.124003 

0.065274 

0.028106 

0.010858 

0.021288 

0.007997 

0.031531 

0.148265 

0.004457 

0.061621 

0.021851 

0.070182 

0.057991 

0.004373 

0.355538 

0.021593 

0.003888 

0.009082 

0.719154 

0.042838 

0.009834 

0.158531 

0.025243 

0.004344 

0.184666 

0.192703 

0.005438 

0.022061 

0.02156 

0.005941 

0.068214 

0.009521 

0.399473 

0.019266 

0.002077 

0.008384 

0.01084 

0.000149 

0.000752 

0.283787 

0.002328 

0.001115 

0.055233 

0.000204 

0.093442 

0.039237 

0.002726 

0.000288 

2.151745 

0.313249 

0.000131 

0.000992 

0.04925 

0.000704 

0.034059 

0.125661 

0.015492 

0.002844 

0.004053 

0.000531 

0.055459 

0.003778 

0.005626 

0.006318 

0.001199 

0.020538 

0.001605 

0.006405 

0.036272 

0.120693 

0.003962 

0.004693 

0.045798 

0.001544 

0.004415 

0.074948 

0.012236 

0.119482 

0.55423 

0.254337 

0.122319 

0.001862 

0.003273 

0.030854 

0.018866 

0.383452 

0.006898 

0.436233 

0.000872 

0.014887 

0.699581 

0.003535 

0.001798 

0.006831 

0.001721 

0.135713 

0.005317 

0.015856 

0.062752 

0.2213 

0.009008 

0.002762 

0.003756 

0.011598 

0.004581 

0.074189 

0.011257 

0.099623 

0.032355 

0.10037 

0.036838 

0.015946 

0.002538 

0.259605 

0.000318 

0.008593 

0.006507 

0.346794 

0.153366 

0.010515 

0.015186 

0.050548 

0.180903 

0.142057 

0.521692 

0.019631 

0.102842 

0.147732 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 97 

0.001529 

0.056669 

0.002252 

0.015238 

0.000923 

0.000615 

0.111691 

0.017014 

0.00089 

0.000523 

0.008633 

0.017235 

0.063827 

0.00359 

0.002392 

0.006705 

0.000667 

0.001321 

0.036087 

0.146539 

2.470928 

0.003185 

0.011559 

0.024452 

0.023446 

0.234131 

0.002578 

0.009817 

0.000399 

0.016788 

0.088437 

0.257768 

0.020446 

0.001196 

0.001265 

0.007615 

0.01902 

0.001603 

0.004198 

0.276223 

0.002497 

0.00087 

0.008303 

0.008041 

0.005558 

0.010228 

0.009774 

0.7353 

0.032405 

0.018272 

0.025684 

0.000245 

0.299976 

0.00309 

0.039026 

0.001366 

0.309133 

0.090497 

0.00621 

2.130093 

0.00034 

0.016197 

0.034144 

0.039883 

0.003806 

0.002822 

0.448586 

0.008448 

0.083281 

0.005707 

0.007407 

0.060084 

0.009554 

0.013099 

0.028484 

0.095439 

0.092825 

0.002028 

0.04298 

0.025495 

0.01047 

0.022355 

0.000604 

0.005445 

1.020917 

0.008953 

0.001074 

0.696619 

0.113503 

0.000908 

0.982834 

0.374451 

0.012594 

0.014512 

0.118169 

0.026439 

1.20428 

0.020088 

0.001525 

0.223647 

0.031029 

0.335301 

0.003036 

0.017824 

0.000692 

0.000584 

0.001287 

0.011289 

0.050758 

0.005615 

0.031579 

0.006228 

0.029879 

0.07118 

0.082412 

0.012662 

0.103946 

0.000831 

0.002807 

0.081354 

0.010351 

0.276134 

0.016326 

0.001078 

0.010788 

0.028928 

0.035301 

0.001762 

8.52E-05 

0.069008 

0.223474 

0.001441 

0.288565 

0.01001 

0.002434 

0.107349 

2.045339 

0.144859 

0.475786 

0.113252 

0.001319 

0.025457 

0.001363 

0.003498 

0.033719 

0.028263 

0.018426 

0.00425 

0.828499 

0.139389 

0.003322 

0.007611 

0.200381 

0.007761 

0.00055 

0.072434 

0.005817 

0.040754 

0.000382 

0.599332 

0.011445 

0.013112 

0.005607 

0.001423 

0.044827 

0.007215 

0.00262 

0.013441 

7.107445 

0.001338 

0.008857 

0.000134 

0.020444 

0.024727 

0.025545 

0.322069 

0.0015 

0.008228 

0.040044 

0.106328 

0.051291 

0.20364 

0.023224 

0.00087 

0.001228 

0.20921 

0.012179 

1.389824 

0.002009 

0.0004 

0.01464 

0.001178 

0.173471 

0.01497 

0.077529 

0.006034 

0.004946 

0.009799 

0.000176 

0.037345 

0.071948 

0.160381 

0.513828 

0.050998 

3.4E-05 

0.00034 

0.004284 

0.130736 

0.026707 

0.005745 

0.014233 

0.90564 

0.008889 

0.019514 

0.023527 

0.047408 

0.076176 

0.00787 

0.00115 

0.00713 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 98 

0.019749 

1.471368 

0.003376 

0.153815 

0.115216 

0.003688 

0.012135 

0.000136 

0.011966 

0.4075 

0.001721 

0.089162 

0.007729 

0.013037 

0.64781 

0.011401 

0.255418 

0.016884 

0.004997 

0.12336 

0.002674 

0.014154 

0.198 

0.000289 

0.008236 

0.000705 

0.482118 

0.290095 

0.022984 

0.001761 

0.035928 

0.515369 

0.107024 

0.044582 

3.094105 

0.015749 

0.051498 

0.004722 

0.004714 

0.575664 

0.010289 

0.024746 

0.004617 

0.007482 

0.016608 

0.002731 

0.028934 

0.024279 

0.001625 

0.001427 

0.01756 

0.099893 

0.013781 

0.003228 

0.007042 

0.032837 

0.030108 

0.00292 

0.000643 

0.012589 

0.010997 

0.031199 

0.00098 

0.010158 

0.011547 

0.006591 

0.000655 

0.677573 

0.000458 

0.00607 

0.001646 

0.005142 

0.000965 

0.017952 

0.001969 

0.003031 

0.00258 

0.002366 

0.005151 

0.009471 

0.029369 

2.907285 

0.108237 

0.002706 

0.000629 

0.00526 

0.12627 

0.000103 

1.346068 

0.030452 

0.077889 

0.018247 

0.000363 

0.005887 

0.230534 

0.04025 

0.002653 

0.000896 

0.017774 

0.049888 

0.00077 

0.027882 

0.038919 

0.115456 

0.058044 

0.002985 

0.005374 

0.003901 

0.000795 

0.484525 

0.017525 

0.042508 

0.006977 

0.022224 

0.009192 

0.002278 

Lemon FDA 29.rdf 

Lemon doc 29 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 34 

TOTALLOD = 396 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1053 doc 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.017 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf 

Based on Orange Juice doc 29 

TOTALNZ = 4 

TOTALLOD = 427 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1056 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Lettuce PDP 25.rdf 

Lettuce doc using 2.8 PCT and PDP data on lettuce 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 99 

TOTALNZ = 42 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.001007 doc half the average LOD method 

TOTALZ = 1444 doc 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.018 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.007 

0.007 

0.026 

0.021 

0.0061 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.01 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.0055 

0.002 

0.002 

0.011 

0.015 

0.002 

0.06 

0.002 

0.0057 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.025 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.007 

Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf 

Nectarine doc 30 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 9 

TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.0025 

TOTALZ = 564 doc 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf 

Nectarine doc using PDP data 2002 and 2006 adjusted to 75 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 147 

TOTALLOD = 171 LODRES = 0.0025 

TOTALZ = 106 doc 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.041 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.017 

0.039 

0.008 

0.047 

0.052 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.04 

0.023 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.07 

0.008 

0.008 

0.021 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.032 

0.008 

0.039 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.025 

0.008 

0.008 

0.019 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.024 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.018 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.039 

0.008 

0.008 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 100 

0.038 

0.049 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.044 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.036 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.017 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.017 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.021 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.036 

0.017 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.022 

0.022 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

0.028 

0.008 

0.008 

0.008 

Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf 

Onion doc assume 57 PCT 

TOTALLOD = 57 LODRES = 0.005 

TOTALZ = 43 doc 

Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf 

Orange doc for the fresh 45 

TOTALNZ = 34 

TOTALLOD = 633 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 

TOTALZ = 816 doc this is for 54 PCT 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.017 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Orange juice PDP 14.rdf 

Orange Juice doc 9 PCT for processed juice 

TOTALNZ = 4 

TOTALLOD = 130 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1353 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Orange processed PDP 5.rdf 

Orange doc 9 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 34 

TOTALLOD = 99 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1350 doc this is for 10 PCT 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 101 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.017 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdf 

Citrus Juice doc 10PCT 

TOTALNZ = 4 

TOTALLOD = 145 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1338 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Other citrus PDP 24.rdf 

Citrus doc based on citrus at 10 

TOTALNZ = 34 

TOTALLOD = 114 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 

TOTALZ = 1338 doc 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.017 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf 

Peach doc domestic 35 

TOTALNZ = 23 

TOTALLOD = 274 LODRES = 0.004217 

TOTALZ = 552 doc 

0.054 

0.007 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.035 

0.007 

0.007 

0.047 

0.007 

0.007 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.007 

0.007 

Peach PDP 63 import.rdf 

Peach doc import 90 

TOTALNZ = 194 

TOTALLOD = 171 LODRES = 0.00186 

TOTALZ = 41 doc 

0.023 

0.007 

0.018 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.032 

0.007 

0.018 

0.018 

0.003 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.019 

0.007 

0.016 

0.015 

0.007 

0.032 

0.013 

0.018 

0.007 

0.19 

0.003 

0.003 

0.012 

0.003 

0.003 

0.029 

0.0074 

0.003 

0.003 

0.0088 

0.013 

0.016 

0.024 

0.034 

0.007 

0.007 

0.016 

0.007 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 102 

0.015 

0.007 

0.007 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.03 

0.041 

0.007 

0.007 

0.043 

0.062 

0.031 

0.007 

0.013 

0.014 

0.007 

0.017 

0.026 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.082 

0.01 

0.02 

0.02 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.023 

0.007 

0.093 

0.015 

0.04 

0.022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.066 

0.007 

0.007 

0.02 

0.016 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.02 

0.039 

0.027 

0.039 

0.015 

0.019 

0.087 

0.024 

0.036 

0.024 

0.041 

0.007 

0.016 

0.051 

0.007 

0.039 

0.051 

0.021 

0.081 

0.014 

0.017 

0.003 

0.003 

0.024 

0.028 

0.025 

0.003 

0.027 

0.032 

0.0077 

0.003 

0.0074 

0.065 

0.02 

0.0094 

0.0072 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.023 

0.014 

0.007 

0.047 

0.007 

0.026 

0.007 

0.007 

0.03 

0.003 

0.003 

0.013 

0.013 

0.022 

0.0089 

0.022 

0.018 

0.007 

0.007 

0.019 

0.033 

0.014 

0.022 

0.022 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.027 

0.026 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.11 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.021 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.061 

0.025 

0.007 

0.007 

Peanut FDA 50.rdf 

Peanut doc reusing EPA file from 2000 

TOTALNZ =6 

TOTALLOD = 94 LODRES = 0.0025 

TOTALZ = 0 doc 

0.021 

0.02 

0.02 

0.0005 

0.04 

0.0005 

Pear PDP 49.rdf 

Pear doc using PDP data 2003 to 2005 

TOTALNZ = 33 

TOTALLOD = 338 LODRES = 0.001686 

TOTALZ = 1112 doc 

0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 103 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.015 

0.041 

0.038 

0.007 

0.017 

0.019 

0.021 

0.0063 

0.025 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.041 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.014 

0.0063 

0.017 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.024 

0.007 

0.014 

PeasPDP 60.rdf 

Pea doc using acute using 5 PCT and PDP green bean data 

TOTALNZ = 14 

TOTALLOD = 60 LODRES = 0.001714 

TOTALZ = 1406 doc 

0.003 

0.04 

0.0063 

0.045 

0.026 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.013 

0.003 

0.011 

0.015 

0.0063 

0.015 

0.051 

Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf 

Pecan doc 35 PCT 

TOTALNZ= 232 

TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc 

TOTALZ = 431 doc 

0.001043 

0.00584 

0.010832 

0.00104 

0.0019 

0.0011 

0.0014 

0.001116 

0.0133 

0.001378 

0.0023 

0.0058 

0.0019 

0.0017 

0.0016 

0.022078 

0.00365 

0.0069 

0.005672 

0.001146 

0.00148 

0.002 

0.003581 

0.00101 

0.001343 

0.003194 

0.003137 

0.001511 

0.0014 

0.0076 

0.001 

0.0018 

0.0103 

0.002581 

0.0017 

0.001816 

0.0019 

0.0029 

0.0033 

0.0015 

0.001079 

0.0034 

0.0155 

0.001904 

0.001143 

0.003604 

0.0028 

0.007168 

0.00333 

0.0013 

0.001552 

0.002073 

0.004466 

0.0035 

0.00659 

0.0013 

0.0019 

0.00197 

0.001354 

0.004317 

0.0021 

0.004657 

0.00543 

0.0021 

0.0059 

0.008 

0.0076 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0026 

0.001478 

0.001065 

0.024804 

0.006787 

0.002606 

0.0013 

0.00277 

0.004791 

0.002425 

0.009487 

0.001334 

0.0027 

0.001 

0.014108 

0.0027 

0.0023 

0.00155 

0.001402 

0.006159 

0.004858 

0.0151 

0.0036 

0.007305 

0.008964 

0.002639 

0.004611 

0.0023 

0.0045 

0.0478 

0.0011 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0123 

0.0038 

0.0072 

0.0015 

0.0025 

0.0055 

0.0057 

0.0028 

0.0014 

0.0012 

0.0016 

0.0089 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0011 

0.0031 

0.0016 

0.0021 

0.001 

0.0027 

0.0045 

0.0016 

0.0015 

0.0022 

0.0021 

0.0018 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 104 

0.00218 

0.0036 

0.002 

0.002048 

0.0015 

0.00514 

0.002 

0.001437 

0.001131 

0.0041 

0.0064 

0.0108 

0.0041 

0.006695 

0.007489 

0.002634 

0.0037 

0.0071 

0.006992 

0.002519 

0.001334 

0.001596 

0.001341 

0.001014 

0.00145 

0.0024 

0.004919 

0.011711 

0.001 

0.0036 

0.002718 

0.009486 

0.002 

0.00269 

0.005 

0.0025 

0.00687 

0.00302 

0.0024 

0.00147 

0.004361 

0.006643 

0.005338 

0.004154 

0.014389 

0.006322 

0.0018 

0.007 

0.00677 

0.0068 

0.0017 

0.003027 

0.002837 

0.009427 

0.002167 

0.002433 

0.001966 

0.002151 

0.001522 

0.009372 

0.011869 

0.005716 

0.002388 

0.006403 

0.002161 

0.003205 

0.009631 

0.005017 

0.00492 

0.00387 

0.0138 

0.0082 

0.0021 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0012 

0.0031 

0.0037 

0.0035 

0.0011 

0.0017 

0.0024 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0011 

0.0073 

0.0033 

0.0016 

0.0034 

0.0043 

0.0012 

0.0015 

0.0017 

0.0011 

0.0234 

0.0043 

0.0042 

0.0013 

0.0108 

0.0013 

0.0023 

0.0011 

0.0032 

0.0021 

Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf 

PEPPER doc assume 20 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 232 

TOTALLOD = 28 LODRES = 0.0006 

TOTALZ = 1299 doc 

0.061 

0.015 

0.002 

0.033 

0.057 

0.11 

0.017 

0.051 

0.56 

0.006 

0.013 

0.0063 

0.029 

0.0053 

0.081 

0.002 

0.23 

0.044 

0.023 

0.056 

0.047 

0.047 

0.053 

0.041 

0.017 

0.1 

0.03 

0.0061 

0.036 

0.26 

0.083 

0.21 

0.037 

0.002 

0.076 

0.008 

0.027 

0.053 

0.14 

0.032 

0.0048 

0.029 

0.034 

0.002 

0.002 

0.037 

0.002 

0.038 

0.031 

0.002 

0.0059 

0.059 

0.002 

0.12 

0.057 

0.15 

0.14 

0.036 

0.008 

0.01 

0.0099 

0.087 

0.002 

0.054 

0.019 

0.002 

0.013 

0.002 

0.22 

0.023 

0.036 

0.0092 

0.037 

0.021 

0.0051 

0.002 

0.097 

0.0075 

0.29 

0.033 

0.0062 

0.07 

0.12 

0.025 

0.009 

0.025 

0.0049 

0.01 

0.0043 

0.029 

0.046 

0.002 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 105 

0.029 

0.11 

0.026 

0.11 

0.04 

0.002 

0.002 

0.032 

0.12 

0.085 

0.027 

0.031 

0.049 

0.0073 

0.054 

0.081 

0.0056 

0.1 

0.31 

0.21 

0.002 

0.041 

0.028 

0.058 

0.093 

0.1 

0.01 

0.038 

0.06 

0.037 

0.11 

0.097 

0.16 

0.033 

0.013 

0.014 

0.002 

0.062 

0.023 

0.13 

0.055 

0.034 

0.002 

0.017 

0.09 

0.35 

0.089 

0.002 

0.028 

0.13 

0.029 

0.024 

0.084 

0.007 

0.11 

0.11 

0.043 

0.04 

0.074 

0.016 

0.002 

0.19 

0.0041 

0.0041 

0.027 

0.063 

0.015 

0.049 

0.069 

0.002 

0.017 

0.13 

0.02 

0.002 

0.0087 

0.014 

0.017 

0.027 

0.081 

0.012 

0.014 

0.074 

0.051 

0.002 

0.002 

0.017 

0.002 

0.046 

0.017 

0.002 

0.002 

0.032 

0.087 

0.28 

0.015 

0.017 

0.038 

0.002 

0.01 

0.013 

0.002 

0.02 

0.47 

0.002 

0.04 

0.03 

0.063 

0.15 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.057 

0.063 

0.002 

0.046 

0.068 

0.058 

0.083 

0.073 

0.072 

0.13 

0.051 

0.016 

0.074 

0.13 

0.019 

0.15 

0.018 

0.042 

0.048 

0.027 

0.049 

0.057 

0.043 

0.075 

0.026 

0.0061 

0.066 

0.22 

0.044 

Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf 

Plum doc using PCT 9 

TOTALNZ = 20 

TOTALLOD = 39 LODRES = 0.002809 

TOTALZ = 600 doc 

0.013 

0.013 

0.005 

0.005 

0.015 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

Plum import PDP 93.rdf 

Plum doc using PCT 30 

TOTALNZ = 110 

TOTALLOD = 17 LODRES = 0.003016 

TOTALZ = 297 doc 

0.043 

0.013 

0.069 

0.027 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.005 

0.032 

0.005 

0.025 

0.026 

0.005 

0.005 

0.01 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 106 

0.013 

0.038 

0.058 

0.12 

0.049 

0.027 

0.013 

0.013 

0.058 

0.013 

0.031 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.038 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.062 

0.042 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.18 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.023 

0.005 

0.005 

0.034 

0.043 

0.041 

0.005 

0.028 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.016 

0.005 

0.011 

0.015 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.016 

0.005 

0.014 

0.005 

0.005 

0.033 

0.017 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.021 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.01 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.005 

0.011 

0.005 

0.005 

0.031 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.013 

0.068 

0.013 

Pork fat PDP 38.rdf 

Pork fat doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies 

TOTALNZ = 1 

TOTALLOD = 39 LODRES = 0.00075 

TOTALZ = 160 doc 

0.0025 

Pork meat PDP 39.rdf 

Pork meat doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 20 LODRES = 0.000375 

TOTALZ = 80 doc 

Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf 

Poultry fat doc using acute using BEAD 2000 RDF procedure 

TOTALNZ = 10 

TOTALLOD = 0 

TOTALZ = 90 doc 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

0.000672 

Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf 

P Poultry doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 10 PCT and PDP 2006 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 10 

LODRES = 0.00075 

TOTALZ = 90 doc 

Prune PDP 45.rdf 

Prune doc using PDP data and 9 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 34 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 107 

LODRES = 0.002714 

TOTALZ = 343 doc 

Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf 

Cucumber doc using 7 

TOTALNZ = 25 

TOTALLOD = 66 LODRES = 0.002 doc 

TOTALZ = 1205 doc 

0.036 

0.038 

0.016 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.037 

0.007 

0.007 

0.03 

0.007 

0.007 

0.014 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.12 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.026 

0.007 

Radish PDP 92.rdf 

radish doc 19 

TOTALNZ = 165 

TOTALLOD = 146 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method 

TOTALZ = 1328 doc 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0078 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0076 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.013 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0065 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.014 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.026 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0048 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.037 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0082 

0.0022 

0.084 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.034 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.015 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.0083 

0.0022 

0.035 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.011 

0.0087 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 108 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0085 

0.0022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

Raisin PDP 54.rdf 

Raisin doc using PDP data 2006 and 2007 

TOTALNZ = 5 

TOTALLOD = 40 LODRES = 0.002581 

TOTALZ = 699 doc 

0.007 

0.022 

0.013 

0.007 

0.007 

Strawberry PDP 36.rdf 

STRAWBERRY doc using scaled 33 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 66 

TOTALLOD = 663 LODRES = 0.00128 

TOTALZ = 1480 doc 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0027 

0.0013 

0.04 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.009 

0.0013 

0.0083 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0026 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.007 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0033 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0013 

0.0083 

0.0013 

0.035 

0.003 

0.003 

0.014 

0.003 

0.003 

0.0069 

0.0097 

Sunflower 62.rdf 

Sunflower doc using 9 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 9 

TOTALLOD = 0 

TOTALZ = 91 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

0.046 

Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf 

Sweet Corn doc 18 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 0 

TOTALLOD = 27 LODRES = 0.007217 doc based on 2007 PDP 

TOTALZ = 125 

sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdf 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 109 

Sweet potato doc 65 

TOTALNZ = 165 

TOTALLOD = 900 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method 

TOTALZ = 574 doc 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0078 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0076 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.013 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0065 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.014 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.026 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0048 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.037 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0082 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.084 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.034 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.015 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.0083 

0.0022 

0.035 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0085 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.011 

0.0087 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

Turnip green PDP 55.rdf 

Turnip greens doc BEAD 2000 of 19 PCT/13 PCT 

TOTALNZ = 29 

TOTALLOD = 101 LODRES = 0.002074 doc half the LOD 

TOTALZ = 556 doc 

0.0065 

0.035 

0.025 

6.3 

0.034 

0.44 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.025 

0.011 

0.011 

0.011 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 110 

0.007 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.007 

0.015 

0.007 

0.24 

0.0063 

0.0063 

0.033 

0.0063 

0.011 

0.011 

0.011 

0.011 

turnip etc PDP 51.rdf 

radish doc 19 

TOTALNZ = 165 

TOTALLOD = 146 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method 

TOTALZ = 1328 doc 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0078 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0076 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.013 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0065 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.014 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.026 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0048 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.037 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0099 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0046 

0.0082 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.084 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.034 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.015 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0066 

0.0083 

0.0022 

0.035 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0085 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.011 

0.0087 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.005 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.0022 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.007 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf 

Walnut doc 55 PCT adjusted 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 111 

TOTALNZ= 232 

TOTALLOD = 69 LODRES = 0.0005 doc 

TOTALZ = 246 doc 

0.001043 

0.00584 

0.010832 

0.00104 

0.0019 

0.0011 

0.0014 

0.001116 

0.0133 

0.001378 

0.0023 

0.0058 

0.0019 

0.0017 

0.0016 

0.022078 

0.00365 

0.0069 

0.005672 

0.001146 

0.00148 

0.002 

0.003581 

0.00101 

0.001343 

0.003194 

0.003137 

0.001511 

0.0014 

0.0076 

0.001 

0.0018 

0.00218 

0.0036 

0.002 

0.002048 

0.0015 

0.00514 

0.002 

0.001437 

0.001131 

0.0041 

0.0064 

0.0108 

0.0041 

0.006695 

0.007489 

0.002634 

0.0037 

0.0071 

0.006992 

0.002519 

0.0103 

0.002581 

0.0017 

0.001816 

0.0019 

0.0029 

0.0033 

0.0015 

0.001079 

0.0034 

0.0155 

0.001904 

0.001143 

0.003604 

0.0028 

0.007168 

0.00333 

0.0013 

0.001552 

0.002073 

0.004466 

0.0035 

0.00659 

0.0013 

0.0019 

0.00197 

0.001354 

0.004317 

0.0021 

0.004657 

0.00543 

0.0021 

0.004919 

0.011711 

0.001 

0.0036 

0.002718 

0.009486 

0.002 

0.00269 

0.005 

0.0025 

0.00687 

0.00302 

0.0024 

0.00147 

0.004361 

0.006643 

0.005338 

0.004154 

0.014389 

0.006322 

0.0059 

0.008 

0.0076 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0026 

0.001478 

0.001065 

0.024804 

0.006787 

0.002606 

0.0013 

0.00277 

0.004791 

0.002425 

0.009487 

0.001334 

0.0027 

0.001 

0.014108 

0.0027 

0.0023 

0.00155 

0.001402 

0.006159 

0.004858 

0.0151 

0.0036 

0.007305 

0.008964 

0.002639 

0.004611 

0.002837 

0.009427 

0.002167 

0.002433 

0.001966 

0.002151 

0.001522 

0.009372 

0.011869 

0.005716 

0.002388 

0.006403 

0.002161 

0.003205 

0.009631 

0.005017 

0.00492 

0.00387 

0.0138 

0.0082 

0.0023 

0.0045 

0.0478 

0.0011 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0123 

0.0038 

0.0072 

0.0015 

0.0025 

0.0055 

0.0057 

0.0028 

0.0014 

0.0012 

0.0016 

0.0089 

0.0022 

0.0064 

0.0011 

0.0031 

0.0016 

0.0021 

0.001 

0.0027 

0.0045 

0.0016 

0.0015 

0.0022 

0.0021 

0.0018 

0.0035 

0.0011 

0.0017 

0.0024 

0.0012 

0.0011 

0.0011 

0.0073 

0.0033 

0.0016 

0.0034 

0.0043 

0.0012 

0.0015 

0.0017 

0.0011 

0.0234 

0.0043 

0.0042 

0.0013 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 112 

0.001334 

0.001596 

0.001341 

0.001014 

0.00145 

0.0024 

0.0018 

0.007 

0.00677 

0.0068 

0.0017 

0.003027 

0.0021 

0.0059 

0.0077 

0.0012 

0.0031 

0.0037 

0.0108 

0.0013 

0.0023 

0.0011 

0.0032 

0.0021 

wheat grain PDP 15.rdf 

Wheat grain doc Doune 2007 says 2 percent but blended so everything at half 

LOD 

TOTALNZ = 8 

TOTALLOD = 935 LODRES = 0.003 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.006 

TOTALZ = 0 

0.01 

0.01 

0.042 

0.01 

0.010 

0.010 

0.010 

0.010 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 113 

Appendix C—DEEM Residue FILE INPUT 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 114 

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 

DEEM-FCID Acute analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS 

Residue file name: C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for 

June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 

Analysis Date 10-26-2010 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 

Reference dose: aRfD = 0.005 mg/kg bw/day NOEL = 0.5 mg/kg bw/day 

Comment: Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from 

http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: 

Index Dist Parameter #1 Param #2 Param #3 Comment 

 # Code 

----- ---- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- 

 1 6 Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf 

 2 6 Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf 

 3 6 Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf 

 4 6 Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf 

 5 6 Orange processed PDP 5.rdf 

 6 6 Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf 

 7 6 APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf 

 8 6 APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf 

 9 6 APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf 

 10 6 Almond PDP RFD 10.rdf 

 11 6 Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf 

 12 6 Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf 

 13 6 Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf 

 14 6 Orange juice PDP 14.rdf 

 15 6 wheat grain PDP 15.rdf 

 16 6 Cranberry PDP 16.rdf 

 17 6 Broccoli PDP 17.rdf 

 18 6 Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf 

 19 6 KIWI FDA 19.rdf 

 20 6 Collard PDP 20.rdf 

 21 6 5B green PDP 21.rdf 

 22 6 Cabbage FDA 22.rdf 

 23 6 Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf 

 24 6 Other citrus PDP 24.rdf 

 25 6 Lettuce PDP 25.rdf 

 26 6 Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf 

 27 6 Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf 

 28 6 brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf 

 29 6 Lemon PDP 29.rdf 

 30 6 Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf 

 31 6 Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdf 

 32 6 Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf 

 33 6 Cherry PDP 33.rdf 

 34 6 Corn PDP 34.rdf 

 35 6 Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf 

 36 6 Strawberry PDP 36.rdf 

 37 6 Beef PDP 37.rdf 

 38 6 Pork fat PDP 38.rdf 

 39 6 Pork meat PDP 39.rdf 

 40 6 Kale PDP 40.rdf 

 41 6 Fig tolerance 41.rdf 

 42 6 Green beans PDP 42.rdf 

 43 6 canned green beans PDP 43.rdf 

 44 6 Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf 

 45 6 Prune PDP 45.rdf 

 46 6 Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf 

 47 6 Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf 

 48 6 Eggs 48 EPA.rdf 

 49 6 Pear PDP 49.rdf 

 50 6 Peanut FDA 50.rdf 

 51 6 Turnip etc PDP 51.rdf 

 52 6 sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdf 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 115 

 53 6 Cucumber PDP 53.rdf 

 54 6 Raisin PDP 54.rdf 

 55 6 Turnip green PDP 55.rdf 

 56 6 Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf 

 57 6 Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf 

 58 6 Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf 

 59 6 Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf 

 60 6 PeasPDP 60.rdf 

 61 6 Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf 

 62 6 Sunflower 62.rdf 

 63 6 Peach PDP 63 import.rdf 

 64 6 Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf 

 65 6 Nick's NAQWA2001 RFD.rdf 

 92 6 Radish PDP 92.rdf 

 93 6 Plum import PDP 93.rdf 

 94 6 Grape imports PDP 94.rdf 

 95 6 Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf 

 96 6 Frozen Sweet Corn PDP 96.rdf 

 97 6 Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf 

 98 6 frozen peas PDP 98.rdf 

 99 6 Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf 

 EPA Crop Food Def Res Adj.Factors RDL Pointers and Ratios 

 Code Grp Name (ppm) #1 #2 P#1 Ratio#1 P#2 Ratio#2 

-------- ---- ---- ---------- ------ ------ --- ------- --- ------- 

14000030 14 Almond 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 

14000031 14 Almond-babyfood 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 

14000040 14 Almond, oil 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 

14000041 14 Almond, oil-babyfood 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 

11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 7 1.0000 

11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 

11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 

11000090 11 Apple, dried 

 0.000128 1.200 0.670 

 Comment: already has PCT in it don't use adjust #2 

11000091 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 

 0.000128 1.200 0.670 

11000100 11 Apple, juice 

 0.010000 0.300 1.000 7 1.0000 

11000101 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 

 0.010000 0.300 1.000 7 1.0000 

11000110 11 Apple, sauce 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 

11000111 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 116 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 

95000190 O Asparagus 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 5.000000 1.000 1.000 3 1.0000 

95000230 O Banana 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 4 1.0000 

95000231 O Banana-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 4 1.0000 

95000240 O Banana, dried 

 0.100000 3.900 1.000 4 1.0000 

95000241 O Banana, dried-babyfood 

 0.100000 3.900 1.000 4 1.0000 

06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06020310 6B Bean, broad, succulent 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06020330 6B Bean, cowpea, succulent 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.000500 99.000 0.010 

06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 99.000 0.010 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.000500 99.000 0.010 

06020370 6B Bean, lima, succulent 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 117 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 98 1.0000 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 98 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 

06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.000500 99.000 0.010 

06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06010430 6A Bean, snap, succulent 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 59 1.0000 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 59 1.0000 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 43 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 43 1.0000 

06010431 6A Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 

21000440 M Beef, meat 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000441 M Beef, meat-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000450 M Beef, meat, dried 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000460 M Beef, meat byproducts 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000461 M Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000470 M Beef, fat 

 0.300000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000471 M Beef,fat-babyfood 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 118 

 0.300000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000480 M Beef, kidney 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000490 M Beef, liver 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

21000491 M Beef, liver-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

01010520 1A Beet, sugar 

 0.000681 0.100 1.000 

01010521 1A Beet, sugar-babyfood 

 0.000681 0.100 1.000 

01010530 1A Beet, sugar, molasses 

 0.000681 1.000 1.000 

01010531 1A Beet, sugar, molasses-babyfood 

 0.000681 1.000 1.000 

05010610 5A Broccoli 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 

05010611 5A Broccoli-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 

05010620 5A Broccoli, Chinese 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 

05020630 5B Broccoli raab 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 

05010640 5A Brussels sprouts 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 28 1.0000 

05010690 5A Cabbage 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 22 1.0000 

05020700 5B Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 

05010710 5A Cabbage, Chinese, napa 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 

05010720 5A Cabbage, Chinese, mustard 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 

05010830 5A Cauliflower 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 27 1.0000 

12000900 12 Cherry 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

12000901 12 Cherry-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 

12000910 12 Cherry, juice 

 1.000000 0.300 1.000 33 1.0000 

12000911 12 Cherry, juice-babyfood 

 1.000000 0.300 1.000 34 1.0000 

40000930 P Chicken, meat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

40000931 P Chicken, meat-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

40000940 P Chicken, liver 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

40000950 P Chicken, meat byproducts 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 119 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

40000951 P Chicken, meat byproducts-babyfoo 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

40000960 P Chicken, fat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

40000961 P Chicken, fat-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

40000970 P Chicken, skin 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

40000971 P Chicken, skin-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

06030980 6C Chickpea, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030981 6C Chickpea, seed-babyfood 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06030990 6C Chickpea, flour 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

10001060 10 Citrus citron 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 

10001070 10 Citrus hybrids 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 

10001080 10 Citrus, oil 

 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

 Comment: adjusted point on PCt 

05021170 5B Collards 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 20 1.0000 

15001200 15 Corn, field, flour 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001201 15 Corn, field, flour-babyfood 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001210 15 Corn, field, meal 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001211 15 Corn, field, meal-babyfood 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001220 15 Corn, field, bran 

 0.000440 1.000 1.000 

15001230 15 Corn, field, starch 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001231 15 Corn, field, starch-babyfood 

 0.000440 0.220 1.000 

15001240 15 Corn, field, syrup 

 0.000440 0.050 1.000 

15001241 15 Corn, field, syrup-babyfood 

 0.000440 0.050 1.000 

15001250 15 Corn, field, oil 

 0.000440 4.500 1.000 

15001251 15 Corn, field, oil-babyfood 

 0.000440 4.500 1.000 

15001270 15 Corn, sweet 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 96 1.0000 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 96 1.0000 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 120 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 

15001271 15 Corn, sweet-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.180 97 1.0000 

95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 

 0.002250 1.000 0.050 

95001281 O Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 

 0.002250 1.000 0.050 

95001300 O Cranberry 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 

95001301 O Cranberry-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 

95001310 O Cranberry, dried 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 

95001320 O Cranberry, juice 

 1.000000 0.300 1.000 16 1.0000 

95001321 O Cranberry, juice-babyfood 

 1.000000 0.300 1.000 16 1.0000 

09021350 9B Cucumber 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 53 1.0000 

70001450 P Egg, whole 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

70001451 P Egg, whole-babyfood 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

70001460 P Egg, white 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

70001461 P Egg, white (solids)-babyfood 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

70001470 P Egg, yolk 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

70001471 P Egg, yolk-babyfood 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 

95001530 O Fig 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 41 1.0000 

95001540 O Fig, dried 

 0.010000 1.000 1.000 41 1.0000 

14001550 14 Filbert 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 11 1.0000 

14001560 14 Filbert, oil 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 11 1.0000 

23001690 M Goat, meat 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

23001700 M Goat, meat byproducts 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

23001710 M Goat, fat 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

23001720 M Goat, kidney 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

23001730 M Goat, liver 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

95001750 O Grape 

 0.010000 1.000 0.490 56 0.4600 94 0.5400 

95001760 O Grape, juice 

 0.002100 1.000 0.490 

95001761 O Grape, juice-babyfood 

 0.002100 1.000 0.490 

95001780 O Grape, raisin 

 0.010000 1.000 0.030 54 1.0000 

10001800 10 Grapefruit 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 26 1.0000 

10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 

 1.000000 0.300 1.000 26 1.0000 

06031820 6C Guar, seed 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 121 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06031821 6C Guar, seed-babyfood 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

24001890 M Horse, meat 

 0.250000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

05021940 5B Kale 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 

95001950 O Kiwifruit 

 2.000000 0.150 1.000 19 1.0000 

05011960 5A Kohlrabi 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 21 1.0000 

10001970 10 Kumquat 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 

10001990 10 Lemon 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 29 1.0000 

10002000 10 Lemon, juice 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 

10002001 10 Lemon, juice-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 

10002010 10 Lemon, peel 

 1.000000 15.000 1.000 29 1.0000 

06032030 6C Lentil, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

04012040 4A Lettuce, head 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 25 1.0000 

04012050 4A Lettuce, leaf 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 25 1.0000 

10002060 10 Lime 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 29 1.0000 

10002070 10 Lime, juice 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 

10002071 10 Lime, juice-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 

05022290 5B Mustard greens 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 

12002300 12 Nectarine 

 0.050000 1.000 0.170 61 0.9100 64 0.0900 

03002370 3 Onion, dry bulb 

 0.500000 1.000 1.000 35 1.0000 

03002371 3 Onion, dry bulb-babyfood 

 0.500000 1.000 1.000 35 1.0000 

03002380 3 Onion, dry bulb, dried 

 0.002850 9.000 1.000 

03002381 3 Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood 

 0.002850 9.000 1.000 

10002400 10 Orange 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 6 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 6 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 5 1.0000 

10002410 10 Orange, juice 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 14 1.0000 

10002411 10 Orange, juice-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 14 1.0000 

10002420 10 Orange, peel 

 1.000000 15.000 1.000 5 1.0000 

06022550 6B Pea, succulent 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 122 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 98 1.0000 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 98 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

06022551 6B Pea, succulent-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

06032560 6C Pea, dry 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06032561 6C Pea, dry-babyfood 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06012570 6A Pea, edible podded, succulent 

 0.050000 1.000 0.030 60 1.0000 

06032580 6C Pea, pigeon, seed 

 0.000500 1.000 0.010 

06022590 6B Pea, pigeon, succulent 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 

12002600 12 Peach 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 

 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 

12002601 12 Peach-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 58 1.0000 

12002610 12 Peach, dried 

 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.800 1.000 58 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

12002611 12 Peach, dried-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

12002620 12 Peach, juice 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 123 

 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

12002621 12 Peach, juice-babyfood 

 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 

95002630 O Peanut 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 50 1.0000 

95002640 O Peanut, butter 

 0.000810 1.000 1.000 

 Comment: adjusted for blend at 6 PCT 

95002650 O Peanut, oil 

 0.200000 2.000 1.000 50 1.0000 

11002660 11 Pear 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 

11002661 11 Pear-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 

11002670 11 Pear, dried 

 0.050000 0.940 1.000 49 1.0000 

11002680 11 Pear, juice 

 0.050000 0.300 1.000 49 1.0000 

11002681 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 

14002690 14 Pecan 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 12 1.0000 

08002700 8 Pepper, bell 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002701 8 Pepper, bell-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002710 8 Pepper, bell, dried 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002711 8 Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002720 8 Pepper, nonbell 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002721 8 Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

08002730 8 Pepper, nonbell, dried 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 

95002750 O Peppermint 

 0.200000 1.000 0.250 

95002760 O Peppermint, oil 

 2.000000 1.000 0.250 

12002850 12 Plum 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

12002851 12 Plum-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

12002860 12 Plum, prune, fresh 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

12002861 12 Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

12002870 12 Plum, prune, dried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 45 1.0000 

12002871 12 Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 0.060 45 1.0000 

12002880 12 Plum, prune, juice 

 0.050000 1.400 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

12002881 12 Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.400 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 

25002900 M Pork, meat 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

25002901 M Pork, meat-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

25002910 M Pork, skin 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 

25002920 M Pork, meat byproducts 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 124 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

25002921 M Pork, meat byproducts-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

25002930 M Pork, fat 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 

25002931 M Pork, fat-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 

25002940 M Pork, kidney 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

25002950 M Pork, liver 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 

60003010 P Poultry, other, meat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

60003020 P Poultry, other, liver 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

60003030 P Poultry, other, meat byproducts 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

60003040 P Poultry, other, fat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

60003050 P Poultry, other, skin 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

10003070 10 Pummelo 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 26 1.0000 

09023080 9B Pumpkin 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 95 1.0000 

01013140 1AB Radish, roots 

 2.000000 1.000 0.190 92 1.0000 

01013160 1AB Radish, Oriental, roots 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 92 1.0000 

05023180 5B Rape greens 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 

01013270 1AB Rutabaga 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.500000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.150 0.190 51 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.150 0.190 51 1.0000 

26003390 M Sheep, meat 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003391 M Sheep, meat-babyfood 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003400 M Sheep, meat byproducts 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003410 M Sheep, fat 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003411 M Sheep, fat-babyfood 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003420 M Sheep, kidney 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

26003430 M Sheep, liver 

 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 

15003440 15 Sorghum, grain 

 0.000110 1.000 1.000 

15003450 15 Sorghum, syrup 

 0.000110 0.050 1.000 

06003470 6 Soybean, seed 

 0.002240 1.000 1.000 

06003480 6 Soybean, flour 

 0.002240 1.000 1.000 

06003481 6 Soybean, flour-babyfood 

 0.002240 1.000 1.000 

06003490 6 Soybean, soy milk 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 125 

 0.002240 1.000 1.000 

06003491 6 Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or in 

 0.002240 1.000 1.000 

06003500 6 Soybean, oil 

 0.002240 0.140 1.000 

06003501 6 Soybean, oil-babyfood 

 0.002240 0.140 1.000 

95003520 O Spearmint 

 0.200000 1.000 0.250 

95003530 O Spearmint, oil 

 2.000000 1.000 0.270 

95003590 O Strawberry 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 36 1.0000 

95003591 O Strawberry-babyfood 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 36 1.0000 

95003600 O Strawberry, juice 

 0.200000 0.300 1.000 36 1.0000 

95003601 O Strawberry, juice-babyfood 

 0.200000 0.300 1.000 36 1.0000 

20003640 20 Sunflower, seed 

 0.100000 1.000 0.030 62 1.0000 

20003650 20 Sunflower, oil 

 0.004140 1.000 0.030 

20003651 20 Sunflower, oil-babyfood 

 0.004140 1.000 0.030 

01033660 1CD Sweet potato 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 

 245-Cooked; Canned; Boiled/baked 

 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 

01033661 1CD Sweet potato-babyfood 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 

10003690 10 Tangerine 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 

10003700 10 Tangerine, juice 

 1.000000 1.000 1.000 31 1.0000 

50003820 P Turkey, meat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003821 P Turkey, meat-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003830 P Turkey, liver 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003831 P Turkey, liver-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003840 P Turkey, meat byproducts 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003841 P Turkey, meat byproducts-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 

50003850 P Turkey, fat 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

50003851 P Turkey, fat-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 126 

50003860 P Turkey, skin 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

50003861 P Turkey, skin-babyfood 

 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 

01013880 1AB Turnip, roots 

 1.000000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 

05023890 5B Turnip, greens 

 0.300000 1.000 1.000 55 1.0000 

14003910 14 Walnut 

 0.200000 1.000 1.000 13 1.0000 

86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 

 0.000008 1.000 1.000 

86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 

 0.000008 1.000 1.000 

 Comment: 65 was RDF file 

15004010 15 Wheat, grain 

 0.500000 1.000 1.000 15 1.0000 

15004011 15 Wheat, grain-babyfood 

 0.500000 1.000 1.000 15 1.0000 

15004020 15 Wheat, flour 

 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 150-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 214-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 

 220-Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 

 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 224-Cooked; Frozen; Fried/baked 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 231-Cooked; Dried; Baked 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 

 233-Cooked; Dried; Fried 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 

 250-Cooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 251-Cooked; Cured etc; Baked 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 127 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 252-Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

 253-Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

15004021 15 Wheat, flour-babyfood 

 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 

15004030 15 Wheat, germ 

 0.500000 2.700 1.000 15 1.0000 

15004040 15 Wheat, bran 

 0.500000 3.000 1.000 15 1.0000 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 128 

Appendix D—Summary of Residue Distribution Files 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 129 

 Summary of Residue Distribution Files (RDF) listed in C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF 

rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 

 RDF File N residues N residues N LODs LOD N Zeros 

 # Name w freq's w/o freq's Value 

 ---- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- ------- 

 1 Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf 

 0 17 209 0.005642 287 

 2 Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf 

 0 4 87 0.002544 116 

 3 Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf 

 0 6 150 0.002 1198 

 4 Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf 

 0 3 205 0.00186 1278 

 5 Orange processed PDP 5.rdf 

 0 34 99 0.002 1350 

 6 Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf 

 0 34 633 0.002 816 

 7 APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf 

 0 17 991 0.001006 496 

 8 APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf 

 0 0 247 0.003136 121 

 9 APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf 

 0 0 478 0.0001024 236 

 10 Almond PDP RFD 10.rdf 

 0 232 3 0.0005 312 

 11 Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf 

 0 232 0 0.0005 928 

 12 Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf 

 0 232 0 0.0005 431 

 13 Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf 

 0 232 69 0.0005 246 

 14 Orange juice PDP 14.rdf 

 0 4 130 0.002 1353 

 15 wheat grain PDP 15.rdf 

 0 8 935 0.003 0 

 16 Cranberry PDP 16.rdf 

 0 71 150 0.002347 95 

 17 Broccoli PDP 17.rdf 

 0 108 438 0.0006 929 

 18 Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf 

 0 6 233 0.002 1252 

 19 KIWI FDA 19.rdf 0 1000 2971 0.0015 3972 

 20 Collard PDP 20.rdf 

 0 22 66 0.002074 591 

 21 5B green PDP 21.rdf 

 0 14 0 0.002155 1386 

 22 Cabbage FDA 22.rdf 

 0 3 53 0.0025 199 

 23 Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf 

 0 3 10 0.0025 242 

 24 Other citrus PDP 24.rdf 

 0 34 114 0.002 1338 

 25 Lettuce PDP 25.rdf 

 0 42 0 0.001007 1444 

 26 Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf 

 0 24 233 0.000863 1143 

 27 Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf 

 0 8 678 0.0009 806 

 28 brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf 

 0 266 1077 0.0006 133 

 29 Lemon PDP 29.rdf 0 34 396 0.002 1053 

 30 Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf 

 0 4 427 0.002 1056 

 31 Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdf 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 130 

 0 4 145 0.002 1338 

 32 Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf 

 0 232 28 0.0006 1299 

 33 Cherry PDP 33.rdf 0 0 222 0.001365 197 

 34 Corn PDP 34.rdf 0 195 0 0.0005 455 

 35 Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf 

 0 0 57 0.005 43 

 36 Strawberry PDP 36.rdf 

 0 66 663 0.00128 1480 

 37 Beef PDP 37.rdf 0 0 20 0.0014 80 

 38 Pork fat PDP 38.rdf 

 0 1 39 0.00075 160 

 39 Pork meat PDP 39.rdf 

 0 0 20 0.000375 80 

 40 Kale PDP 40.rdf 0 36 4 0.001928 762 

 41 Fig tolerance 41.rdf 

 0 1 0 0.0025 99 

 42 Green beans PDP 42.rdf 

 0 14 90 0.001714 1376 

 43 canned green beans PDP 43.rdf 

 0 0 65 0.002355 863 

 44 Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf 

 0 20 39 0.002809 600 

 45 Prune PDP 45.rdf 0 0 34 0.002714 343 

 46 Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf 

 0 0 10 0.00075 90 

 47 Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf 

 0 10 0 0 90 

 48 Eggs 48 EPA.rdf 0 10 0 0 90 

 49 Pear PDP 49.rdf 0 33 338 0.001686 1112 

 50 Peanut FDA 50.rdf 0 6 94 0.0025 0 

 51 Turnip etc PDP 51.rdf 

 0 165 146 0.001071 1328 

 52 sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdf 

 0 165 900 0.001071 574 

 53 Cucumber PDP 53.rdf 

 0 25 53 0.002 1218 

 54 Raisin PDP 54.rdf 0 5 40 0.002581 699 

 55 Turnip green PDP 55.rdf 

 0 29 101 0.002074 556 

 56 Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf 

 0 15 31 0.001932 715 

 57 Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf 

 0 23 274 0.004217 552 

 58 Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf 

 0 0 35 0.005 65 

 59 Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf 

 0 1 38 0.002285 516 

 60 PeasPDP 60.rdf 0 14 60 0.001714 1406 

 61 Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf 

 0 9 233 0.0025 564 

 62 Sunflower 62.rdf 0 9 0 0 91 

 63 Peach PDP 63 import.rdf 

 0 194 171 0.00186 41 

 64 Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf 

 0 147 171 0.0025 106 

 92 Radish PDP 92.rdf 0 165 146 0.001071 1328 

 93 Plum import PDP 93.rdf 

 0 110 17 0.003016 297 

 94 Grape imports PDP 94.rdf 

 0 165 547 0.001793 0 

 95 Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf 

 0 25 66 0.002 1205 

 96 Frozen Sweet Corn PDP 96.rdf 

 0 0 104 0.002347 476 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 131 

 97 Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf 

 0 0 27 0.007217 125 

 98 frozen peas PDP 98.rdf 

 0 0 65 0.002014 1228 

 99 Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf 

 0 0 2 0.00871 98 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 132 

Appendix E—DEEM Analysis FILE OUTPUT 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 133 

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 

DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS (1994-98 data) 

Residue file: DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 

Adjustment factor #2 NOT used. 

Analysis Date: 10-28-2010/16:43:49 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 

NOEL (Acute) = 0.500000 mg/kg body-wt/day 

Acute Pop Adjusted Dose (aPAD) varies with population; see individual reports 

MC iterations = 5000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 24 

Run Comment: "Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from http://www.epa.gov/o 

ppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf" 

=============================================================================== 

Summary calculations--per capita: 

--- 95th Percentile---- --- 99th Percentile---- ---99.9th Percentile---- 

 Exposure % aPAD MOE Exposure % aPAD MOE Exposure % aPAD MOE 

---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- 

U.S. Population: 

 0.000020 0.41 24598 0.000051 1.02 9800 0.000169 3.39 2952 

All infants: 

 0.000043 8.54 11705 0.000086 17.11 5845 0.000211 42.14 2373 

Nursing infants (<1 yr old): 

 0.000026 5.11 19566 0.000067 13.49 7410 0.000143 28.69 3486 

Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old): 

 0.000048 9.50 10521 0.000093 18.53 5397 0.000212 42.44 2356 

Children 1-6 yrs: 

 0.000051 10.10 9896 0.000103 20.55 4865 0.000253 50.63 1975 

Children 7-12 yrs: 

 0.000025 4.98 20097 0.000051 10.13 9871 0.000157 31.41 3183 

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing): 

 0.000016 3.15 31737 0.000037 7.45 13429 0.000185 36.96 2705 

Females 13+ (nursing): 

 0.000018 3.57 28006 0.000042 8.49 11775 0.000161 32.10 3115 

Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing): 

 0.000014 2.82 35475 0.000033 6.56 15234 0.000100 19.93 5016 

Females 20+ (not preg or nursing): 

 0.000014 2.81 35638 0.000033 6.61 15137 0.000150 29.91 3343 

Females 13-50 yrs: 

 0.000014 2.82 35484 0.000033 6.59 15172 0.000135 26.94 3711 

Males 13-19 yrs: 

 0.000015 0.30 32963 0.000037 0.73 13691 0.000130 2.61 3834 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 134 

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 

DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS (1994-98 data) 

Residue file: DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 

Adjustment factor #2 NOT used. 

Analysis Date: 10-28-2010/16:43:49 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 

NOEL (Acute) = 0.500000 mg/kg body-wt/day 

Acute Pop Adjusted Dose (aPAD) varies with population; see individual reports 

MC iterations = 5000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 24 

Run Comment: "Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from http://www.epa.gov/o 

ppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf" 

=============================================================================== 

Summary calculations (per capita): 

--- 95th Percentile---- --- 99th Percentile---- ---99.9th Percentile---- 

 Exposure aPAD MOE Exposure aPAD MOE Exposure aPAD MOE 

---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- 

Males 20+ yrs: 

 0.000015 0.29 34386 0.000035 0.70 14331 0.000154 3.08 3247 

Seniors 55+: 

 0.000015 0.29 34262 0.000034 0.68 14658 0.000166 3.31 3017 

Children 1-2 yrs: 

 0.000063 12.57 7955 0.000126 25.19 3969 0.000273 54.62 1830 

Children 3-5 yrs: 

 0.000046 9.28 10776 0.000093 18.65 5362 0.000225 44.95 2224 

Children 6-12 yrs: 

 0.000026 5.23 19119 0.000053 10.67 9371 0.000159 31.71 3153 

Youth 13-19 yrs: 

 0.000015 2.91 34339 0.000035 7.01 14265 0.000115 23.04 4339 

Adults 20-49 yrs: 

 0.000014 0.29 34926 0.000034 0.68 14686 0.000146 2.92 3426 

Adults 50+ yrs: 

 0.000014 0.29 34755 0.000034 0.68 14717 0.000166 3.31 3018 

Females 13-49 yrs: 

 0.000014 2.82 35422 0.000033 6.59 15174 0.000134 26.84 3726 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 135 

Appendix F—Key Output from DEEM Critical Commodity Analysis File 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 136 

Note on CEC was only be generated for the first 932 iterations in the MCA 

Output was truncated at 0.1% contributions 

Cheryl Cleveland 

DEEM-FCID Acute Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis (Ver 2.16) 

CSFII 1994-98 

Residue file = C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for June 

2010 pulbication runs.r98 

Date and time of analysis: 10-28-2010 20:19:07 

Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. 

Adjustment factor #2 not used. 

Minimum exposure contribution = 1% 

Monte Carlo Iterations = 1000 Seed = 24 

CEC records generated for first 972 iterations. 

Exposures divided by body weight 

Subpopulations: 

 1 Children 1-2 yrs 

================================================================================ 

Children 1-2 yrs 

Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure (mg/day) = 0.000126 

High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure (mg/day) = 0.275895 

Number of actual records in this interval: 36458 

Critical foods with foodforms for this population (as derived from these records): 

 N=number of appearances in all records (including duplicates) 

 %=percent of total exposure for all records (including duplicates) 

Food FF N Percent Food Name 

-------- --- ----- ------- ------------- 

95001760 110 11888 13.64% Grape, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5021170 212 360 12.48% Collards-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

95001950 110 370 11.32% Kiwifruit-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95001750 110 5406 6.50% Grape-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

12002600 110 2180 3.63% Peach-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5021170 242 61 2.85% Collards-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

10002410 110 2419 2.58% Orange, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95001320 110 842 2.45% Cranberry, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5023890 212 66 2.17% Turnip, greens-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

11002681 240 982 2.16% Pear, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6003490 210 1655 2.08% Soybean, soy milk-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 210 866 2.03% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 110 850 1.99% Pepper, bell-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010690 212 185 1.89% Cabbage-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

15001270 242 1890 1.69% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

10002410 120 1296 1.67% Orange, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

95001320 240 1134 1.51% Cranberry, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

12002600 240 2263 1.40% Peach-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

11000100 110 4827 1.39% Apple, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11002660 110 973 1.31% Pear-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95001760 120 1010 1.26% Grape, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010690 110 614 1.23% Cabbage-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 6003490 230 998 1.17% Soybean, soy milk-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

11000070 110 4708 1.08% Apple, fruit with peel-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook 

Meth N/S 

95001760 240 5859 0.93% Grape, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

11002660 240 1064 0.83% Pear-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15001270 212 1064 0.77% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 5023890 242 52 0.66% Turnip, greens-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 8002700 213 354 0.57% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

95002630 211 936 0.56% Peanut-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 137 

10002400 110 1231 0.52% Orange-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 6022550 242 406 0.49% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

15004010 211 7110 0.46% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 5021940 212 61 0.44% Kale-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 9021350 110 298 0.41% Cucumber-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 240 141 0.40% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

20003640 211 170 0.39% Sunflower, seed-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

95000230 110 1927 0.38% Banana-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11002661 240 248 0.38% Pear-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

12002850 110 184 0.38% Plum-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 211 313 0.38% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 6010430 212 234 0.37% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 5010610 212 842 0.36% Broccoli-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

95001300 240 210 0.35% Cranberry-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 215 253 0.34% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

12002880 110 101 0.31% Plum, prune, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth 

N/S 

 9021350 240 195 0.29% Cucumber-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010610 222 270 0.29% Broccoli-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

15001270 222 490 0.27% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 8002720 212 163 0.26% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

95003590 110 889 0.25% Strawberry-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

12002300 110 144 0.21% Nectarine-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95000190 212 63 0.18% Asparagus-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 1033660 211 120 0.18% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 4012040 110 170 0.16% Lettuce, head-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11000101 240 522 0.16% Apple, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

11000100 240 1643 0.15% Apple, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15004020 211 5055 0.13% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

12002600 211 66 0.13% Peach-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 6010431 240 66 0.12% Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook 

Meth N/S 

 6022551 240 105 0.12% Pea, succulent-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15004040 230 856 0.11% Wheat, bran-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 1033660 212 65 0.11% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

12002600 120 55 0.10% Peach-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

15004010 230 896 0.10% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002370 210 1553 0.10% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 212 72 0.09% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 3002370 212 1677 0.09% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

12002610 130 28 0.09% Peach, dried-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002720 215 93 0.08% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

95001761 240 364 0.08% Grape, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6020330 212 30 0.07% Bean, cowpea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

15004030 230 701 0.07% Wheat, germ-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

12002601 240 157 0.07% Peach-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6020370 242 41 0.07% Bean, lima, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 8002720 210 89 0.06% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95001780 130 228 0.06% Grape, raisin-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

21000440 210 1286 0.06% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

15004010 231 1000 0.06% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Baked 

 3002380 210 899 0.06% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth 

N/S 

 6022550 212 62 0.06% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

10002410 240 448 0.06% Orange, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15004020 214 1005 0.06% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 

12002620 110 68 0.05% Peach, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

20003640 210 102 0.05% Sunflower, seed-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

21000440 211 729 0.05% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

10003690 110 50 0.05% Tangerine-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002380 212 630 0.05% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 5010610 220 97 0.05% Broccoli-Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

12002851 240 28 0.04% Plum-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002700 221 32 0.04% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 

15004020 231 1743 0.04% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Dried; Baked 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 138 

11000100 120 100 0.04% Apple, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 9023080 211 13 0.04% Pumpkin-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 8002700 222 29 0.04% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

 5022290 242 13 0.04% Mustard greens-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

95001750 210 452 0.04% Grape-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002370 213 481 0.04% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

95001300 211 35 0.04% Cranberry-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

 3002381 240 391 0.03% Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook 

Meth N/S 

95002630 210 226 0.03% Peanut-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

21000440 212 376 0.03% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 5010611 240 20 0.03% Broccoli-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 1033660 210 42 0.03% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95001750 240 395 0.03% Grape-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6020370 212 20 0.03% Bean, lima, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

95002630 231 947 0.03% Peanut-Cooked; Dried; Baked 

15004010 232 95 0.03% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 6012570 210 30 0.03% Pea, edible podded, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; 

Cook Meth N/S 

 8002730 210 151 0.02% Pepper, nonbell, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth 

N/S 

 5010640 222 14 0.02% Brussels sprouts-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 

15004020 210 829 0.02% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11002660 210 218 0.02% Pear-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11002680 240 103 0.02% Pear, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 5021940 242 10 0.02% Kale-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 3002370 211 556 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

21000440 213 447 0.02% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

 8002730 212 46 0.02% Pepper, nonbell, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 9021350 150 11 0.02% Cucumber-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002370 230 248 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

 8002720 110 11 0.02% Pepper, nonbell-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002370 110 591 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 6010430 242 168 0.02% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 5010610 210 30 0.02% Broccoli-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

10002000 110 340 0.01% Lemon, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010690 150 9 0.01% Cabbage-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 

15004030 232 715 0.01% Wheat, germ-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 3002370 215 267 0.01% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 

12002860 232 5 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

 6010430 215 9 0.01% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; 

Boiled/baked 

 1013880 212 6 0.01% Turnip, roots-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

 6010430 210 7 0.01% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth 

N/S 

40000930 210 420 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

15004040 214 152 0.01% Wheat, bran-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 

12002620 240 14 0.01% Peach, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6022550 210 11 0.01% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

15004020 240 511 0.01% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15004020 212 487 0.01% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 

95000231 240 88 0.01% Banana-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 3002380 242 143 0.01% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

95001760 210 463 0.01% Grape, juice-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

95000190 242 11 0.01% Asparagus-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 5010610 110 84 0.01% Broccoli-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

11002680 110 10 0.01% Pear, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010690 213 8 0.01% Cabbage-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

95000241 230 22 0.01% Banana, dried-babyfood-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 

95002640 210 386 0.01% Peanut, butter-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 1013160 210 9 0.01% Radish, Oriental, roots-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth 

N/S 

40000930 211 213 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 

95003590 120 22 0.01% Strawberry-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 

 5010690 255 5 0.01% Cabbage-Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled/baked 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 139 

95003590 240 42 0.01% Strawberry-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

15004010 213 53 0.01% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

12002600 210 7 0.01% Peach-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

21000440 240 175 0.01% Beef, meat-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

 6020330 242 5 0.01% Bean, cowpea, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 

 8002720 240 23 0.01% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 

12002861 240 6 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth 

N/S 

 8002720 150 5 0.01% Pepper, nonbell-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 

21000470 210 233 0.01% Beef, fat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 

 6030420 232 230 0.01% Bean, pinto, seed-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 

15001250 900 185 0.01% Corn, field, oil-Refined; FF N/A; Cook Meth N/S 

40000930 213 124 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 

Critical foods (without foodforms) for this population (as derived from these records): 

 N=number of appearances in all records (including duplicates) 

 %=percent of total exposure for all records (including duplicates) 

Food N Percent Food Name 

-------- ----- ------- ------------- 

95001760 19220 15.84% Grape, juice 

 5021170 421 15.33% Collards 

95001950 370 11.32% Kiwifruit 

95001750 6253 6.57% Grape 

 8002700 2914 5.88% Pepper, bell 

12002600 4571 5.27% Peach 

10002410 4169 4.31% Orange, juice 

95001320 1991 3.96% Cranberry, juice 

 6003490 2656 3.25% Soybean, soy milk 

 5010690 821 3.15% Cabbage 

 5023890 118 2.83% Turnip, greens 

15001270 3495 2.73% Corn, sweet 

11002681 982 2.16% Pear, juice-babyfood 

11002660 2255 2.16% Pear 

11000100 6571 1.58% Apple, juice 

11000070 4712 1.08% Apple, fruit with peel 

 5010610 1371 0.73% Broccoli 

 9021350 504 0.72% Cucumber 

15004010 9314 0.66% Wheat, grain 

95002630 2111 0.62% Peanut 

 6022550 530 0.56% Pea, succulent 

10002400 1231 0.52% Orange 

 5021940 71 0.46% Kale 

20003640 278 0.44% Sunflower, seed 

 8002720 406 0.44% Pepper, nonbell 

 6010430 484 0.41% Bean, snap, succulent 

95001300 245 0.39% Cranberry 

95000230 1940 0.38% Banana 

12002850 184 0.38% Plum 

11002661 248 0.38% Pear-babyfood 

 1033660 252 0.32% Sweet potato 

12002880 101 0.31% Plum, prune, juice 

 3002370 5496 0.30% Onion, dry bulb 

95003590 954 0.27% Strawberry 

15004020 9909 0.27% Wheat, flour 

12002300 144 0.21% Nectarine 

95000190 74 0.19% Asparagus 

21000440 3051 0.17% Beef, meat 

 4012040 177 0.16% Lettuce, head 

11000101 522 0.16% Apple, juice-babyfood 

15004040 1027 0.12% Wheat, bran 

 6022551 105 0.12% Pea, succulent-babyfood 

 3002380 1948 0.12% Onion, dry bulb, dried 

 6010431 66 0.12% Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood 

 6020370 65 0.10% Bean, lima, succulent 
Dow AgroSciences LLC 

Study ID: 101760 

Page 140 

12002610 28 0.09% Peach, dried 

 6020330 38 0.08% Bean, cowpea, succulent 

15004030 1542 0.08% Wheat, germ 

95001761 364 0.08% Grape, juice-babyfood 

12002601 157 0.07% Peach-babyfood 

12002620 82 0.06% Peach, juice 

95001780 285 0.06% Grape, raisin 

10003690 50 0.05% Tangerine 

 8002730 269 0.04% Pepper, nonbell, dried 

 5022290 13 0.04% Mustard greens 

12002851 28 0.04% Plum-babyfood 

 9023080 16 0.04% Pumpkin 

40000930 906 0.03% Chicken, meat 

 3002381 391 0.03% Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood 

11002680 113 0.03% Pear, juice 

 6012570 42 0.03% Pea, edible podded, succulent 

 5010611 20 0.03% Broccoli-babyfood 

 5010640 17 0.02% Brussels sprouts 

12002860 5 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh 

12002861 6 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 

21000470 404 0.01% Beef, fat 

 6030420 320 0.01% Bean, pinto, seed 

95000231 88 0.01% Banana-babyfood 

95002640 395 0.01% Peanut, butter 

95000241 22 0.01% Banana, dried-babyfood 

 1013880 6 0.01% Turnip, roots 

 1013160 9 0.01% Radish, Oriental, roots 

15001250 185 0.01% Corn, field, oil 

10002000 391 0.01% Lemon, juice 

Number of printed records = 28178 

Number of records represented = 36458 

 (nf = number of foods/ff reported for this daily exposure amount (exceeding minimum 

contribution) 

 (nx = number of times this exposure amount was computed for the same person on the same 

day.)