alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Thompson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered December 7, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to *162an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

In this buy-and-bust operation, an undercover officer approached defendant as he leaned against a building on 125th Street in Manhattan and asked whether he was "working”. Defendant responded "Right this way in the hall” and led her down the hallway where she purchased four vials of cocaine from the codefendant in exchange for $20 in prerecorded buy money. Defendant then accompanied her out of the building, where he resumed his stance against the building, and she alerted backup. The defendants were arrested, and the undercover officer confirmed identifications. Neither buy money nor contraband was recovered.

No reasonable view of the evidence supports a conclusion that the defendant acted solely as a procuring agent for the undercover officer so as to mandate an agency defense charge. Considering the totality of circumstances, the evidence established that defendant acted as a middleman for the actual seller. *(People v Ortiz,*76 NY2d 446.)

The prosecutor’s comment on summation, that the jury should not speculate that the "buy” money may have been given as change to a subsequent purchaser of narcotics, if error, was rendered harmless by the court’s curative instructions.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them meritless. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL KING,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 414 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4671 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain mixtures containing 

Trifloxystrobin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on certain mixtures 

containing Trifloxystrobin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES CONTAINING 

4 TRIFLOXYSTROBIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4671 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing Methyl 

(αE)-α-(methoxyimino)-2- 

[[[(E)-[1-[3- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]- 

ethylidene]amino]- 

oxy]methyl]benzeneacetate 

(Trifloxystrobin) (CAS 

141517–21–7), including 

application adjuvants provided for in subheading 

3808.91.50 ........................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 0818, 0819,

0820, 0821

Focus Ready Draft 8 / 29 / 2013

PV (kg / yr): ENGINEER: Prothero \ REC

SUBMITTER: yNOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER._INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0 814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 0818, 0819,

0820, 0821_INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 0818, 0819,

0820, 0821_INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815

, 0816, 0817, 0818, 0819,

0820, 0821
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period beginning April 1, 2000, through April 1, 2002. 

For further information, contact Dixie E. Snider, Jr., M.D., Executive Secretary, ACIP, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, ­(M/S D-50), telephone 404/639-7240 or fax 404/639-7341. 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and ATSDR.                 

Dated: September 19, 2000. 

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 00-24624 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4861-18-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PVH Corp. (“the Company”) for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated:September 3, 2015By:/s/ EMANUEL CHIRICOName:Emanuel ChiricoChairman and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_____________

No. 96-1670NE

_____________

Millard Processing Services, a *

Nebraska corporation, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Tetra Laval Convenience Food, *

Inc., formerly known as TW * [UNPUBLISHED]

Kutter, Inc., doing business as *

TW Kutter, doing business as TW *

Kutter/Koppens, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: October 23, 1996

 Filed: October 30, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Millard Processing Services appeals an adverse grant of summary

judgment in this diversity action. Having reviewed de novo the grant of

summary judgment, we find no error by the district court. Because an

extended opinion would lack precedential value, we affirm the district

court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Shale Proved Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 4      | 14     | 6      | 2      | 55     | 0      | 601   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 120   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 49     | 162    | 251    | 0      | 8      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### JAMES v. HOLT.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 6, 1951.

B. M. Vincent, T. H. Demunbrun, Brownsville, for appellant.

V. R. Logan, Brownsville, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

On appeal from a judgment against him in an automobile negligence case, the defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a peremptory instruction, because the plaintiff failed • to prove venue.

The action was brought in Edmonson County. The petition alleged that the accident occurred in Edmonson County. The defendant’s answer consisted only of a general denial. In the proof, there was no specific evidence that the place of the accident was in Edmonson County.

There is no general rule of law requiring that the plaintiff, in his petition, allege facts establishing that he is bringing the action in the proper county under the statutes governing venue. If he chooses to allege such facts, they are not material to his cause of action, and there is no necessity that he prove them, at least where no issue as to venue is raised by the defendant’s pleadings.

If the petition shows on its face that the action is being brought in the wrong county, the defendant may raise the objection !by special demurrer; otherwise, the objection must be raised by a special plea under Section 118 of the Civil Code of Practice. Pinnacle Motor Co. v. Simpson, 216 Ky. 184, 287 S.W. 566; Richardson v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 129 Ky. 449, 111 S.W. 343, 112 S.W. 582. If the defendant does not properly raise the question of venue, any objection as to venue is waived. Pinnacle Motor Co. v. Simpson, supra.

The provision of Section 74 of the Civil Code of Practice that a personal injury action must be brought in the county in which the defendant resides, or in which the injury was done, is not an absolute requirement, but is one that must be invoked by the defendant if he wishes to compel *160compliance with it. If he does not invoke it by proper pleading, the question of venue becomes immaterial.

Under the pleadings in this case, the plaintiff had no obligation to prove his allegation that the accident occurred in Edmonson County.

The appellant, in a general way, complains of other errors in the case. The questions he raises are not embraced in the statement of points and authorities in his brief, as required by Rule 1.340 of this Court, and for that reason we would be justified in ignoring them. However, we have considered the questions, and find no merit in appellant’s contentions.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on Benefit Continuity After Organizational 
Restructuring Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits 
Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Working Group of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefit Plans studying benefit continuity after organizational 
restructuring will hold an open public meeting on Friday, October 13, 
2000, in Room N-5437 A-D, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to 
approximately noon, is for Working Group members to discuss what 
recommendations will be included in their report.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before October 
13, 2000, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory 
Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Working Group should forward their 
request to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral 
presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement 
may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who 
need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by October 
13, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before October 13.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 29th day of September, 2000.
Leslie Kramerich,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-24654 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Western) Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 215    | 207   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 222    | 180    | 154    | 147    | 72     | 64     | 68     | 53     | 56     | 125   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 102    | 52     | 34     | 33     | 84     | 76     | 68     | 64     | 99     | 27    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 74     | 131    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Birdsall, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered on February 10, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of four years to life for each count, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.