alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Crude Oil Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Crude Oil Production (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 267    | 266    | 265    | 292    | 303    | 342    | 372    | 421   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 419    | 459    | 451    | 485    | 467    | 409    | 406    | 414    |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Daniel F. Primeau, IV, et al., Respondents, v Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: The proponent of a motion for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, by "tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case” *(Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center,*64 NY2d 851, 853; *see also, GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales,*66 NY2d 965). If the moving party fails to make such a showing, the motion must be denied, "regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers” *(Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, supra,*at 853).

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that plaintiffs failed to submit proof in admissible form of the value of their loss and, consequently, that Supreme Court erred by granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Balio, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2216 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2216

To amend the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act to 
allow for amendments to the Border Environment Cooperation Agreement to 
    promote infrastructure projects financed by the North American 
 Development Bank in the border region to promote growth in trade and 
 commerce between the United States and Mexico, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2011

 Mr. Hinojosa (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. 
  Dreier, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Gene Green of 
Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Mr. Reyes, Mrs. Napolitano, 
  Mr. Pierluisi, Mr. Baca, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Meeks, Ms. 
  Velazquez, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. Polis, and Mr. Lujan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act to 
allow for amendments to the Border Environment Cooperation Agreement to 
    promote infrastructure projects financed by the North American 
 Development Bank in the border region to promote growth in trade and 
 commerce between the United States and Mexico, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NADBank Enhancement Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO AGREE TO AMENDMENTS TO THE BORDER ENVIRONMENT 
              COOPERATION AGREEMENT.

    Section 545 of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (22 U.S.C. 290m-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end of the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) change the purposes and functions of the Bank, 
        including changes that would allow the Bank to finance 
        infrastructure projects in the border region that promote 
        growth in trade and commerce between the United States and 
        Mexico, support sustainable economic development, reduce 
        poverty, foster job creation, and promote social development in 
        the region.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00687-CR

CHRISTY ALLANE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 064768

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On November 13, 2015, the Court struck the second Anders brief filed by counsel 

Michael Hamilton, granted Mr. Hamilton’s motion to withdraw, and ordered the trial court to 

appoint new counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. We have received the trial court’s 

order appointing Garland Caldwell as appellant’s new attorney.

We DIRECT the Clerk to list Garland Caldwell as appellant’s appointed attorney of 

record.

Appellant’s brief is due within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 4      | 5      | 7      | 14     | 26     | 19     | 19     | 22     | 27    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24     | 19     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                                
|Louisiana Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                                
|Louisiana Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 33     | 12     | 8      | 20    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 9      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 9, 2011





/s/  "Ruth Swan"

Ruth Swan,

Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00658-CR

NO. 03-11-00659-CR

David Preston Campbell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. CR22,208 & CR22,209, HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

In the above causes, appellant David Preston Campbell was convicted of the offenses

of burglary of a building and theft and, for each offense, was sentenced to 18 months’ confinement

in state jail, with the sentences to run concurrently. Campbell filed a notice of appeal from each

judgment of conviction. In each cause, appellant’s brief was due on March 25, 2013.

Instead of filing appellant’s brief, counsel for appellant has filed a motion to abate

the appeal in each cause. In the motions, counsel represents that Campbell has served the entirety

of his sentence and that the only issue on appeal that counsel intended to raise, whether Campbell

had received the appropriate amount of jail-time credit for his sentences, is now moot. Accordingly,

counsel intends to file a motion to dismiss the appeal in each cause. However, counsel further

represents that he has been unable to locate Campbell in order to obtain Campbell’s signature on
the motions to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a) (requiring appellant’s signature on motion to

voluntarily dismiss appeal in criminal case). Counsel asks that we abate the appeals in orderto allow

counsel more time to locate his client.

In each cause, we grant counsel’s motion and abate the appeal. No later than June 10,

2013, counsel is ordered to file either a proper motion to dismiss the appeal or a status report

explaining why the motion to dismiss has not been filed. Because appellant’s brief remains overdue

at this time, failure to file a motion or status report by the deadline may result in referral of these

causes to the district court for a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Abated

Filed: May 10, 2013

Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of TransMontaigne Partners L.P. at December 31, 2011*

Ownership of subsidiary

Name of subsidiary

Trade name

State/Country of organization100%

TransMontaigne Operating GP L.L.C.

None

Delaware100%

TransMontaigne Terminals L.L.C.

None

Delaware100%

TLP Mex L.L.C.

None

Delaware100%

TPSI Terminals L.L.C.

None

Delaware100%

TransMontaigne Operating Company L.P.

None

Delaware100%

Razorback L.L.C. (d/b/a Diamondback Pipeline L.L.C.)

None

Delaware100%

TLP Operating Finance Corp.

None

Delaware100%

TMOC Corp.

None

Delaware100%

TPME L.L.C.

None

Delaware100%

Penn Octane de Mexico, S. de R.L.de C.V.

None

Mexico100%

Tergas, S. de R.L. de C.V.

None

Mexico100%

Termatsal, S. de R.L. de C.V.

None

Mexico


*Omits
non-operating subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate, do not constitute significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011.


---



QuickLinks
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 464 

To prohibit United States contributions to the International Fund for Ireland. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Mr. CHAFFETZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States contributions to the International 

Fund for Ireland. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBU4 TIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR 

5 IRELAND. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds appropriated or other7 wise available to any Federal department or agency may 

8 be obligated or expended to make United States contribu9 tions to the International Fund for Ireland. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition contained in 

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to funds approVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:27 Feb 02, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H464.IH H464

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 464 IH

1 priated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 

2 and subsequent fiscal years. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                    
|No chart available.                                                    
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Indiana Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Alorna Coat Corp., Respondent, v Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Doyle, J.), entered July 6, 1989, which, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiff damages totaling $340,658.56, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action for breach of a contract of insurance covering business interruptions, plaintiff served its claim more than one year, but less than two years, after the occurrence. Although the policy contained a one-year contractual limitations period, defendant did not assert any affirmative defense on this ground, as defendant regarded the two-year limitation imposed under the standard fire insurance policy required by *330Insurance Law § 3404 (e) as controlling. However, shortly before trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District held that a business interruption loss, even if resulting from fire, is controlled by the one-year limitation on the contract, rather than by the two-year statutory limitation *(Fox-Knapp, Inc. v Employers Mut. Cas. Co.,*725 F Supp 706, 709, *affd*893 F2d 14).

The IAS court properly denied defendant’s motion to interpose an affirmative defense based on *Fox-Knapp (supra).*Defendant has not demonstrated persuasively that the action is time barred; rather, it relies on a purported change in the law based on a Federal decision that is not binding on State courts. To the extent that the *Fox-Knapp*decision was purportedly based on existing New York State law, those sources existed prior to the defendant’s motion, and the defendant could have relied on them at any time, rather than actively contending that a two-year limitation of action controlled.

The trial evidence demonstrates that the insured met its burden of establishing both the damage resulting from the business interruption and the applicability of the policy to that damage *(see, Howard Stores Corp. v Foremost Ins. Co.,*82 AD2d 398, *affd*56 NY2d 991).

We have considered defendant’s other arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Kassal, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 21, 2022

No. 04-22-00031-CR

Frank Edwin STEPHENSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-20-0000012

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief is due on October 21, 2022. However, the appellee has filed a second 

motion requesting an extension of time to file its appellee brief. The motion is GRANTED. The 

appellee’s reply brief is due on or before November 21, 2022. Any further extension will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of October, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court