alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2002 (the “Report”) by Sonesta International HotelsCorporation (the “Company”), we, Roger P. Sonnabend, Paul Sonnabend and Boy A.J. van Riel, in our respective positions of Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to ourknowledge:

 

•                  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | Boston,  November 12, 2002   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   |                         |
|   |   |                         |
|   |   | /s/ Roger  P. Sonnabend |   |
|   |   | Name:                        | Roger P.  Sonnabend |
|   |   | Title:                       | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   | /s/ Roger  P. Sonnabend |   |
|   |   | Name:                        | Paul  Sonnabend |
|   |   | Title:                       | Chairman of the  Executive Committee  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   |                         |   |
|   |   | /s/ Boy  A. J. van Riel |   |
|   |   | Name:                        | Boy A. J.  van Riel |
|   |   | Title:                       | Vice  President and Treasurer |
|        |        |                              |  |  |

 

25

----
STATE OF IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OFTHEEXECUTIVE 

## MAY 192011

1410 North Hilton. Boise, Idaho 83706' (208) 373-0502 C.L. "Butch" Otter, Governor Toni Hardesty, Director May 16,2011

Dennis McLerran Regional Administrator EPA Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, W A 98101 DearMr. McLerran: On behalfofthe Governor ofthe State ofIdaho and as the Director ofthe Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), I am submitting Idaho's recommendations for area designations related to the recently revised SulfurDioxide (S02) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). On June 2, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the health-based primaryNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for S02 by establishing a new I-hour standard at a level of75 parts perbillion (ppb). In the same action EPA revoked the two existing primary standards of 140 ppb evaluated over 24-hours, and 30ppb evaluated overan entire year because they will not add additional public health protection given a I-hour standard at 75 ppb. The revised S02standard includes a new "form." The new form is the 3-year average ofthe 99th percentile ofthe annual distribution ofdaily maximum i-hour average concentrations. EPA anticipates initially designating areas based on 2008-2010 monitoring data, orrefined dispersion modeling results ifprovided by the state. Areas which violate the standard would be designated as "nonattainment'. Areas that have both monitoring data and appropriate refined modeling results showing no violations would be designated as "attainment." All other areas would be designated as "unclassifiable." Per your letter received byDEQ on March 24,2011 EPA does notexpect states to complete modeling for all significant sources ofS02 and assess the results in time for the designation recommendations due to EPA by June 3, 2011. DEQ has monitored S02for a number ofyears in Caribou (AQS ID 160290031) and Bannock County (AQS ID 160050004). The 2008-2010 design values for these two monitors are 53 ppb and 60ppb, respectively (please note: 2010 data is not yet certified).Dennis McLerran May 16,2011 Page 2

To date DEQ has not modeled significant sources ofS02to determine compliance with the new I-hour standard. The Clean Air Act (CAA) directs states to submit by June 3, 2013 a State Implementation Plan (SIP) demonstrating an adequate program to implement, maintain and enforce the S02 NAAQS. In light ofthe lack ofmodeling data available at this time, DEQ plans to include in this plan a demonstration ofexpeditious attainment and maintenance ofthe S02 NAAQS. Onthis basis, and on behalfofthe Governorofthe State ofIdaho, c.L. "Butch" Otter, I am recommending that the entire State ofIdaho and all ofIdaho's Air Quality Control Regions (AQCRs 61,62,63 and 64) be designated as unclassifiable for the one-hour SOl NAAQS. IfEPA has any further questions orconcerns, please coordinate through Martin Bauer, Air Quality Division Administrator ofDEQ (208/373-0552). Sincerely,

Toni Hardesty Director

c: Governor C.L."Butch" Otter
### NUM BER 13-0 8-38 8-CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG
REG INA LD A ND RE CA LL IS, A pp ellan t,
v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.
On ap pe al f rom th e 2 4th D istrict Co urt of Ja ckso n Co un ty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ch ief Ju stice Va lde z an d Ju stice s Y añ ez an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Reg ina ld Andre Cal li s, attempt s to appeal his conv ic ti on for poss ess ion
w it h i nte n t t o d e l i v e r c o c a i n e . A l t h o u g h t h e t r i a l c o u rt h a s c e rt i fi e d t h a t t h i s i s n ot a ple a barg ain ca se and t he defendant has a ri g ht to appeal, it w as superseded on June 24, 2008, to s how the appel lan t has w aiv ed hi s r ig ht t o appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2).2

On Au gust 8, 200 8, th is Court n o t if ie d app ellant ’s counse l of the trial court’s cer ti ficat ion and ord er ed counse l to: (1 ) r ev iew the re cord; (2) determi ne w hether appel lan t has a rig ht to app eal; a nd (3) forw ard to th is Cou rt , by l etter , cou nsel ’s findi ng s a s t o w hether appel lan t has a ri g ht to appeal , or , alt er nati v ely , adv is e thi s Cou rt as to the ex is tenc e of any

amended cer

ti ficat ion

. On Au gust 20, 20 08, coun sel f iled a lette r brief w ith this Court. Co unse l’s respo nse does not e sta bli sh that the c erti ficat ion cu rrentl y on fil e w it h thi s Cou rt is inc or re ct or that appel lan t ot her

w is e has a r ig ht t o appea l. The Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Proc edure prov ide that an appeal mustbe d is mis sed if the trial court’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe d e f e n dan t has th e rig ht of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .1, 4 4.3 , 44. 4. Acco rdingly , this app eal is DI SM ISSE D. An y

pendi ng moti ons ar e deni ed as moot. P E RC U R I A M
Do not p ubl is h. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv er ed and filed thi s t he 16th day

of Oct ober , 200 8.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 1 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Texas--RRC District 1 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 251    | 48     | 1,272  | 2,818  | 791    | 2,057  | 4,465  | 530    | 1,402  | 2,279 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,449  | 604    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of TAC Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/S/    JONATHAN H.
COHENName:

Jonathan H. CohenDate: March 30, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William M. Clancy, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

|/s/ William M. Clancy        | 
|---------------------------- | 
|                             | 
|William M. Clancy            | 
|Principal Accounting Officer | 
|May 10, 2004                 | 
|                             | 

19

---

---
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2149 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2011 

Ms. HANABUSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, 

as the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CECIL L. HEFTEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, 

6 Hawaii, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cecil L. 

7 Heftel Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2149 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 912    | 258    | 68     | 3      | 0      | 4      | 52     | 0      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135691 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135691 

 COA: 273180 
 Wayne CC: 06-004359-01

LOUIS FERNANDO HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, a/k/a, 

LOUIS FERNANDO HERNANDEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Louisiana--North Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Louisiana--North Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | -1     | -1     | 1      | 1      | -2     | -2     | 3      | -8     | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | -2     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White
      River Capital, Inc.




Date:
      March 31, 2006.






/s/
      John M. Eggemeyer, III




John
      M.
      Eggemeyer, III


Chief
      Executive Officer











/s/
      Martin J. Szumski




Martin
      J.
      Szumski


Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 97-DP-00376-SCT

ALAN DALE WALKER

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

ON MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: LESLIE S. LEE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY: CONO CARANNA

NATURE OF THE CASE: MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

DISPOSITION: GRANTED - 3/11/99

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED:

EN BANC.

SMITH, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶1. Alan Dale Walker was convicted in August, 1991, of the capital murder of Konya Rebecca Edwards in

Harrison County. Walker was also convicted in the same trial of the rape and kidnapping of Edwards. His

conviction and death sentence were affirmed by this Court in Walker v. State, 671 So.2d 581 (Miss.

1995), cert. denied, Walker v. Mississippi, 117 S.Ct. 518 (1996). Walker filed his Petition for Post

Conviction Collateral Relief in this Court on March 17, 1997. Along with his petition Walker filed a Motion

for Appointment of Counsel for Post Conviction Relief in this Court. Walker's petition raises numerous

issues alleging violations of various state and federal statutory and constitutional rights.

¶2. Walker asks in his Motion for Appointment of Counsel for Post Conviction Relief that counsel be

appointed by this Court to aid him in seeking post-conviction relief. Pursuant to this Court's decision in

Henry Curtis Jackson, Jr. v. State, 98-DR-00708-SCT 1999 WL 339041(Miss. Jan. 28, 1999), the

Court finds that this motion is well taken and is granted. The matter is remanded to the Harrison County

Circuit Court for appointment of counsel consistent with this Court's decision in Jackson. Appointed

counsel will have thirty days from the date of appointment to file any additional request for post-conviction

relief with this Court.
¶3. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF

GRANTED. REMANDED TO THE HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR ALAN DALE WALKER.

PRATHER, C.J., SULLIVAN AND PITTMAN, P.JJ., BANKS, McRAE, MILLS AND

WALLER, JJ., CONCUR.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4799 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on handheld electric can openers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on handheld 

electric can openers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HANDHELD ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.38 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 handheld electric can openers) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4799 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS