alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5


                                [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
                            LYDIAN TRUST COMPANY [TM]



Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
400 Countrywide Way
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Attn: Amy Hamlin

        Re: Officer's Certificate (BV MBS 2005-1)


To Whom It May Concern:

     The undersigned officer of Lydian Private Bank (the "Bank") hereby
certifies in connection with the Bank's servicing of certain mortgage loans on
behalf of the addressee that:

     (i) a review of the activities of the Bank during the 2005 calendar year
     and of its performance under the applicable mortgage loan servicing
     agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Bank has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable mortgage loan
     servicing agreement throughout the 2005 calendar year.



                                    LYDIAN PRIVATE BANK



                                    By:  /s/ Grace M. Dahl
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Name: Grace M. Dahl
                                        Title: Senior Vice President
                                        Certified this 21st day of March, 2006



                 180 Royal Palm Way, Palm Beach, Florida 55400
                 Telephone 561.514.4900 Facsimile 561.514.4913
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00199

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Natalie Marie MEDINA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4 78603

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On August 8, 2017, this court issued its first opinion in this appeal. Thereafter, appellee

timely filed a motion for rehearing. This court denied appellee’s motion for rehearing, but

withdrew our opinion and judgment of August 8, 2017, and issued a new opinion and judgment

on October 18, 2017. A ppellee then filed a second motion for rehearing on Nove mber 2, 2017

. After review, we DENY the motion for rehearing filed by appellee on November 2, 201 7

. See

Thomas v. State , 4 7 0 S.W.3d 577, 581 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2015), aff’d

, 505 S.W.3d

916 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016).

We order the clerk of thi s court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav e hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4606 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4606

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize the issuance of right-of-way permits for natural gas 
       pipelines in Glacier National Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may issue right-of-
way permits for each natural gas pipeline (including all appurtenances 
used in the operation of the natural gas pipeline) that, as of March 1, 
2012, is located within the boundary of Glacier National Park.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--A permit issued under subsection (a) 
shall be--
        (1) issued as a right-of-way renewal, consistent with laws 
    (including regulations) generally applicable to utility rights-of-
    way within units of the National Park System;
        (2) for a width of not more than 25 feet on either side of the 
    centerline of the natural gas pipeline; and
        (3) subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary of 
    the Interior determines to be necessary.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60174

Summary Calendar

ADEKUNLE ABOLAJI KAZEEM,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 133 054 

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adekunle Abolaji Kazeem (Kazeem), a citizen of Nigeria,

petitions this court for review of the order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) adopting and affirming the immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of

removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and

his request for voluntary departure. Kazeem contends that he

provided sufficient evidence to sustain his burden of proof

regarding his application for withholding of removal.
No. 06-60174

-2-

This court reviews “the BIA’s factual conclusion that an alien

is not eligible for withholding of [removal] only to determine

whether it is supported by substantial evidence.” Zamora-Morel v.

I.N.S., 905 F.2d 833, 838 (5th Cir. 1990). The substantial

evidence standard requires that the decision be affirmed unless

“the evidence compels a contrary conclusion.” Carbajal-Gonzalez v.

I.N.S., 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996); see also I.N.S. v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). 

Kazeem fails to show that substantial evidence supports the

conclusion that he has suffered past persecution or will more than

likely suffer persecution if he is returned to Nigeria. See 8

C.F.R. § 208.16(b); Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 594 (5th Cir.

2006). Kazeem has abandoned the issues regarding the denial of his

applications for asylum, voluntary departure, and relief under the

CAT by failing to brief the issues in his petition for review. See

Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir. 1986).

Accordingly, Kazeem’s petition for review is DENIED.
Filed: December 4, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2043 (CA-97-1821-JFM) John Wingert, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus United States Government, Defendant - Appellee.

ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed November 19, 1997, as follows: On page 2, first paragraph, line 3 -- the word "allged" is corrected to read "alleged." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2043 JOHN WINGERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1821-JFM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wingert, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (West Supp. 1997). Appellant alleged the existence of a wide-ranging conspiracy between the Ku Klux Klan and the United States Government to control him and cause him harm. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Wingert v. United States Gov't , No. CA-97- 1821-JFM (D. Md. June 11, 1997). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4534 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on biaxially oriented 

polypropylene film. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COURTNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on biaxially 

oriented polypropylene film. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIAXIALLY ORIENTED POLYPROPYLENE FILM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.75 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 biaxially oriented polypropylene film) is amended by strik7 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4534 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paul H. Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ PAUL H. SUNU
---------------------------------------------

Name:    Paul H. Sunu
Title:   Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
          and Secretary
Date:    November 15, 2004




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
32





Certification
Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Solitron Devices, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”),
I, Shevach Saraf, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of Solitron Devices, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of
      the Company.





Date:
January 12, 2010


/s/ Shevach SarafShevach
      SarafChairman,
      President,Chief
      Executive Officer,Treasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 31     | 4      | 15     | 2      | 24     | 2      | 2      | 5      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 28, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00649-CV

DAVID L. GLASSEL, Appellant

V.

SEAMLESS OPERATING GROUP, LLC INDIVIDUALLY AND 

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF CHEMICAL FREE SOLUTIONS, 

LLC., AND CEDAR OIL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-41601

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 3, 2014. The clerk’s record 

was filed November 18, 2014. The reporter’s record was filed December 1, 2014. 

No brief was filed.
2

On March 26, 2015, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

submitted a brief on or before April 20, 2015, the court would dismiss the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
#### RUDESAIL v. STATE.

No. 23567.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Plouston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of robbery and, by reason of the allegation and proof of two previous convictions for like offense, his punishment was assessed at life imprisonment in the State penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. There is nothing presented to this court for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

NO. 03

- 22

- 00451

- CV

Chupik Properties and Design, Inc., and Randall Chupik , Appellant s

v.

MCCS, Ltd. , Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 19

- 00 6861 , THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

T h is Court issued its opinion and judgment in this case April 24, 2024 . On

June 20, 2024 , appellants and appellee filed a joint motion notifying the Court th at they had

reached a mu t ual settlement of the underlying claims and request ing that we dismiss the case

with prejudice

. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we grant the p arties ’ joint

motion , vacate the trial court ’ s judgment, withdraw o ur judgment dated A pr il 24, 2024

, a nd

dismi ss the case with prejudice

. See id. R. 42.1(a)(2)(A) , (c) , 43.2 ( e )

. We tax co sts against the

party incurring same.

1 This Court granted appellee ’ s mult iple motions for extension of ti me to file a motion for r ehearing and has c onstrue d the p arties ’ joint motion a s a mot ion for r ehearing

. See Tex. R. Ap p. P. 19.1 ( providing that pending motion for rehearing ext ends app ellate court ’ s period of ple nar y po wer).2 __________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Befor e Justices Baker, Kelly, and Theofanis

Vacated and D ismissed on Motion for Rehearing

Filed: July 5, 2024
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors




Securus
Technologies, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-124962 and 333-145040) on Form S-4 of Securus Technologies, Inc. of our
report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet
of Securus Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and comprehensive
loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2009
annual report on Form 10-K of Securus Technologies, Inc.






KPMG
LLP


Dallas,
Texas


March 15,
2010







1
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Robert J. Evans, certify that:  (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Butte Co., Inc. (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) (Not required) (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: June 30, 2006 By:    /s/ Robert J. Evans Robert J. Evans, Secretary/Treasurer and Director
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopsmith, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Folkerth,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18

U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. November 15, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ John FolkerthChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Page 18