alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Scahill, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree. On appeal, he argues that the court erred by refusing his request to charge both reckless and negligent assault in the third degree as lesser included offenses. We agree. Assault in the third degree under either of these theories is a proper lesser included offense of assault in the second degree *(People v Fasano,*107 AD2d 1052, 1053). Here, the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to defendant *(see, People v Martin,*59 NY2d 704, 705), could support a conclusion that defendant did not intend to cause physical injury to the victim, but stabbed him to prevent the victim from beating defendant’s brother. The jury could have found that "in the tension and confusion of the situation, defendant either consciously disregarded the *858danger to [the victim] or negligently failed to perceive it in favor of his concern with stopping [the victim]” *(People v Sullivan,*68 NY2d 495, 502).

The trial court further erred by holding that if defendant took the stand, he could be cross-examined about an unrelated charge then pending in City Court *(see, People v Betts,*70 NY2d 289, 291). Defendant placed upon the record the fact that his decision not to testify was grounded in the court’s erroneous *Sandoval*ruling *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371).

The court also erred by allowing evidence that defendant made no attempt to contact the police after the incident *(People v De George,*73 NY2d 614). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.—assault, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:August 31, 2017By:/s/ MICHAEL SHAFFERName:Michael ShafferExecutive Vice President andChief Operating & Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-J2
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-J2


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 87,478 | 70,292 | 75,648 | 74,564 | 74,057 | 86,172 | 85,865 | 85,962
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 74,694 | 77,696 | 73,631 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### McDOWELL v. STATE.

No. 25132.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the offense of possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area.

A jury being waived, trial was had before the court on a plea of not guilty, resulting in a judgment of conviction with punishment at a fine of $150.00 and one day in jail.

T. R. Gholson, an employee of the Texas Liquor Control Board, in possession of search warrant, entered the premises of appellant situated in a dry area. According to the statement of facts, following the overruling of an objection to the testimony regarding such search, “Mr. Gholson was then permitted to testify that he found several bottles of intoxicating liquor on the premises and that the amount of intoxicating liquor found there was in excess of one quart.”

We find no proof in the record that the intoxicating liquor found on the premises of appellant was whiskey.

Such being the allegation of the State, in the absence of proof that appellant possessed whiskey for the purpose of sale, the conviction cannot stand.

The affidavit for search warrant includes the positive averment that the premises occupied by appellant was a place where alcoholic beverages were unlawfully possessed, sold, manufactured, kept *125and stored in violation of the provisions of the Texas Liquor Control Act. Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666-1 et seq. The objection to the introduction of testimony as to the search made thereunder, and the result thereof, was therefore not error. See Harris v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 219, 15 S.W.2d 1048.

The evidence being insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

•Opinion approved by the Court
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Texas--RRC District 8 Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 2      | 126    | 161    | 500    | 158    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

(2006/C 40/02)

The Kingdom of Spain, of the one part, and the Council of the European Union, of the other part,

Having regard to the conclusions adopted by the Council on 13 June 2005 on the official use of additional languages within the Council and possibly other Institutions and bodies of the European Union,

Whereas there are languages within the Union other than those referred to in Council Regulation No 1/1958 whose status is recognised by the Constitution of a Member State in all or part of its territory or the use of which as a national language is authorised by law,

Whereas, in the framework of efforts being made to bring the Union closer to all its citizens, the richness of its linguistic diversity must be taken more into consideration, and whereas allowing citizens the possibility of using these other languages in their relations with the Institutions is an important factor in strengthening their identification with the European Union's political project,

Have agreed to conclude this ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT to allow the official use at the Council of the languages other than Castilian (Spanish) whose status is recognised by the Spanish Constitution.

Written communications to the Council of the European Union

Speeches to a meeting of the Council

Making public of acts adopted in codecision

Costs

Final provisions

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4473 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Mesotrione. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

Mesotrione. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MESOTRIONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Mesotrione) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘6.11%’’ and inserting ‘‘6.2%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4473 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Chlorpyrifos-Methyl’s Use on Stored Grains (Corn and Wheat): Checking our available data 

sources, both proprietary (Kline, 2004) and (NASS, 1999 and 2002) data, almost 110,000 pounds 

of Chlorpyrifos-Methyl was used on stored grains, on-farm (35,000 Lbs.) and off-farm (75,000 

Lbs.). This amounted to 6 percent of the stored-grain insecticide market. The 2004 proprietary 

data showed that the leading active ingredient is Aluminum Phosphide with 43 percent of the 

market, followed by Diatomaceous Earth (28%), and Malathion (15%). For Wheat, the only 

NASS Post-Harvest data are about 11,000 Lbs. of Chlorpyrifos-Methyl used in 1999, and almost 

19,000 Lbs. used in 2002. There were no NASS post-harvest data on corn during these two 

years (1999 and 2002).

Proprietary Data Used:

THE U.S. MARKET FOR STORED GRAIN INSECTICIDES 2004 

Public Data Links Used : 

Agricultural Chemical Usage – Postharvest Applications – Corn and Wheat (March 

1999):

http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/AgriChemUsPostHarv//1990s/1999/AgriChem

UsPostHarv-03-18-1999_Corn%20and%20Wheat.pdf

Agricultural Chemical Usage – Postharvest Applications – Wheat (March 2002):

http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/AgriChemUsPostHarv//2000s/2002/AgriChem

UsPostHarv-03-13-2002_Wheat.pdf
Exhibit 4.376

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 170425 dated February 17, 2019

 

To render

 

data transmission services for voice

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

February 17, 2024

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 816-рчс dated November 30, 2018

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Lagrasse, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered May 25, 1988, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

That branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony was properly denied since the complainant’s identification of the defendant was made spontaneously and was not the product of an identification procedure arranged by the police *(see, People v Fiorvante,*108 AD2d 925; *People v Dukes,*97 AD2d 445).

We have analyzed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.
## THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN. TP,XAS 78711
October 3, 1977

Honorable Robert Grade1 Lampasas County Attorney P. 0. Box 95 Lampasas, Texas 76550 Opinion No. H-1064 Re: Whether a county clerk can replace an erroneous original death certificate with a corrected certificate. DearMr. Gradel: You have asked for an opinion on the following question:

Whether the County Clerk can remove a death certificate which has an erroneous cause of death, and replace itwith anew original, with the correct cause of death? Rule 40a of article 4477,V.T.C.S..,requires the filing of a certificate for each death with the local registrar of the district inwhich the death occurred. Rule 51a, article 4477, provides for the amendment of death certificates:

After its acceptance for registration by the local registrar, no record of anybirth, death, or stillbirth shall be altered or changed: provided, however, that ifany such record is incomplete, or satisfactory evidence can be submitted proving the record tobe inerror in any respect, an amending certificate may be filed for thepurpose of completing or correcting such record, which amendment shall be ina form prescribed by the State Department of Health and shall, if accepted for filing, be attached to and become a part of the legal record of such birth, death, or stillbirth. This provision expressly forbids alteration of adeath certificate after its acceptance by the local registrar. Anyone who wilfully alters adeath certificate other than asprovided by rule 51a of article 4477 isguilty of amisdemeanor, and upon conviction is subject topunishment. V.T.C.S. art. 4477~.

.p. 4564Honorable Robert Grade1 -Page 2 (H-1064)

Attorney General Opinion O-4654 (1942),discussing portion of rule 51a,determined that an erroneous birth thiscertificate should not be removed or destroyed, but corrected by attaching an amendment. We believe the removal of the erroneous certificate would be an alteration of adeath record forbidden by rule 51a. Cf.Wichita Farm Lighting Co. v.Moore, 46 S.W.2d 383 (Tex.Civ.xp. --Amarillo 1932, nowrit)(detachment ofwritten agreement attached to note constituted material alteration of note). We understand that the death certificate in this case has already been corrected inaccordance with rule 51aby the attachment of an amending certificate, which isnow part of the legal record of the death. SUMMARY The County Clerk may not remove adeath certificate which has an erroneous cause of death and replace itwith anew original showing the correct cause of death. The certificate may be corrected inaccordance with rule 51aof article 4477, V.T.C.S.,,bythe attachment of an amending certificate.

Attorney General of Texas APPROVED: 

# YL-LA+

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant

c. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jst

P. 4565
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4638 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Nitrotoluene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALTMIRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Nitrotoluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-NITROTOLUENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 p-Nitrotoluene, (CAS No. 

99–99–0) (provided for in 

subheading 2904.20.10) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4638 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 4/20/2012 Sample Number: 121654-001 Date Collected:04/11/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/11/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 1.1 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/19/2012 12:55 

### Sample Number: 121654-002 Date Collected:04/11/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/11/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 5.6 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/19/2012 13:00 

### Sample Number: 121654-003 Date Collected:04/11/2012 08:00 Date Received:4/11/2012 

## 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 360 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/19/2012 13:05

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121654 Page 1 of 1
#### Jess NITZSCHKE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 18, 1954.

Rodes K. Myers, Bowling Green, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman-, Jr., Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

. Motion for appeal from a judgment convicting movant of the offense of having in his. possession intoxicating liquors • in local option territory for purpose of sale; imposing penalty of a fine of $100 and 60 days’ imprisonment. . . .

We find no prejudicial error; the motion for appeal is overruled arid judgment affirmed.