alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                    SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                      Nov-30-1995
<CASH>                                                     50
<SECURITIES>                                               34
<RECEIVABLES>                                             157
<ALLOWANCES>                                               18
<INVENTORY>                                               714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          997
<PP&E>                                                    937
<DEPRECIATION>                                            451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     583
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   93
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,531
<SALES>                                                    92
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           92
<CGS>                                                      84
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              84
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           84
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (79)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (49)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (49)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.59)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4466 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4466

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Fosetyl-Al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Fosetyl-Al.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOSETYL-AL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fosetyl-Al) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.4%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 26    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 28     | 21     | 50     | 51     | 54     | 16     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 19     | 9      | 42     | 104    | 217    | 314    | 883    | 736    | 1,506 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,077  | 589    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CBIC Control Number 

356397 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

2013 OCT 18 AM 11 : 55 

October 3, 2013 

Document Control Office (7407 M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA East Building, Room E6428 (202-564-8930) 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Attention : TSCA Section 4 

40 CFR 799.5087 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: SHARON 

Re: Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of 

Chemicals. Federal Register 76 (5),1067-1093, January 7, 2011 . 

C.I . Leuco Sulphur Black 1 (CAS No. 66241-11-0) -

Transfer from Clariant Corporation to Archroma U.S., Inc. 

To Whom It May Concern : 

Clariant Corporation has previously committed to comply with the above-referenced test rule for 

C.I . Leuco Sulphur Black 1 (CAS No. 66241-11-0). 

This letter is to notify you that Clariant Corporation has sold its textiles business to Archroma 

U.S., Inc., effective at 12:59 p.m. on September 30, 2013. The sale of the textiles business 

included Clariant's rights and obligations related to C.I . Leuco Sulphur Black 1 . 

Archroma U.S ., Inc., therefore commits to comply with the above-reference test rule for C.I . 

Leuco Sulphur Black 1 (CAS No. 66241-11-0) in the place of Clariant Corporation. 

Both companies have signed this letter below to indicate their consent. If you need anything 

further with regard to this transfer, please contact Andreas Lotz at Andreas.lotz@archroma .com. 

Sincerely, 

Clariant Corporation Archr,pma U.S ., Inc. 

/ 

Andrea 

Head of ESHA Services, North America Head of Textile Business North America, 

Mexico and Central America 

p. 1 

CLARIANT~ 

Clariant Corporation 

4000 Monroe Road 

Charlotte, NC 28205 

cc: Tucker Helms, ETAD 
ORIG'N I) 0WA~i SHIP DATE : 040CTt3 

CRRIiS CHJIpCH RCTWGT : 0 .2 LB 

11L.PR'fINT ~ .~OR°GRF1T[ON CAD : 06BEiB69/CRFE2704 

OGIL:O PN)N POE: ~'v'DqD 

CHFRI.01'T;' N': SIB'd06 -~B ILL SENDER 

IJpliT'I :Ci 5ri!IT'Ei L_IS 

T0jji()ig',IUplIIFiN'~' CONTROL OFFICER, MC-7407 

i US s IE!ENI''IfIIJNMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1g216'wl9a C0141':i'PI'I'UTION AVENIJE,NW 

IEIIA EAST IiIN ;CE .DING, CE3IC R001'16426 

WA~~~~iNiI NGTOili DC 20460 

c2c121 I>fla-BB :n P01 U118001604-021201 

RUT ?PSH'i _ 

IIIIIII III IIIII IIIII I I II INII IIIII II II~I III IIIIII II I II IIII IIIIII I III I II II IIIII II IIIII III III I I III 

FedEx 

Express , 

Eg 

i~ ~~~~I ~ a{i " ~ ~ i11 

0201 

MAN -6aaee ~~ 

wii27nias STANDARD OVERNIGHT 

AV HDVA " °" ' 

I~~II~~I~IIIIIIIIIIIIII~I~~u~III~I~NIII~IIN . 

488183 040CT13 QWGA 519C1/AB1B/93AB
#### ADCOCK v. STATE.

No. 23940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1948.

*175J. Webb Stollenwerck, Jr., of Hillsboro, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, •for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense •of burglary and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years.

Appellant’s only contention is that the evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain his conviction. We agree with him in this respect. It was charged in the indictment that appellant on or about the ISth day of April, Á.D. 1947, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment in the County and State aforesaid did then and there unlawfully by force, threats, and fraud break and enter a house, etc. This charged a daytime as well as a nighttime burglary. Art. 1390, P.C., provides as follows :

> “He is also guilty of burglary who, with intent to commit a felony or theft, by breaking, enters a house in the daytime.”

Art. 1392, P.C., defines entry as follows:

> “The 'entry’ into a house includes every kind of entry but one made by the free consent of the occupant, or of one authorized to give such consent; it is not necessary that there should be any actual breaking to constitute burglary, except when the entry is made in the daytime.”

Therefore, under the allegations in the indictment, the state was required to prove that the accused entered the building by either of the means charged in the indictment. In the instant case, the state not only failed to prove the “breaking” in order to gain an entry into the house but also failed to prove that appellant entered the •same at the time in question. Therefore, the evidence is wholly insufficient to justify .•appellant’s conviction. In support of what ■we have said here, we refer to the following authorities: Livingston v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 437, 112 S.W.2d 190; Crews v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 545, 5 S.W.2d 999, and Bates v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 568, 99 S.W. 551.

Having reached the conclusion that the •evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History: Annual                          
|View History: Annual                          
|View History:                                 
|                                              
|U.S. Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)    
|                                              
|                                              
|U.S. Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)    
|                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,293  | 2,116  | 3,110 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,336  | 7,994  | 10,371 | 11,415 | 13,447 | 15,213 | 17,032 | 18,589 | 22,054 | 25,556
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26,139 | 27,985 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4583 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4583

To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the suspension of duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON, NOT CARDED, COMBED OR 
              OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.55.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to staple fibers of viscose 
rayon, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                      
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|California - Coastal Region Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vicky A. Bucinell, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered February 6, 1989, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of bail jumping in the second degree.

Contrary to defendant’s claim, County Court properly directed that defendant’s sentence, as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1 Vi to 3 years for bail jumping in the second degree, be served consecutively to a sentence previously imposed for forgery in the second degree *(see, People v McManus,*124 AD2d 305). In pleading guilty to both of these charges, six other charges against defendant were dropped and it was agreed that the sentences imposed would be served *662consecutively *(see, People v Perrotti,*153 AD2d 992, *lv denied*75 NY2d 774). Under these circumstances, defendant’s contention that the sentence is harsh and excessive lacks merit *(see, People v Gholston,*130 AD2d 843, *lv denied*70 NY2d 799).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-3    (File    No. 333-138520)    and    Form S-8    (File    No. 333-128159)    of Dresser-Rand Group Inc. of our report dated March 7,    2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting of Dresser-Rand    Group Inc. (Successor) and our report dated May 12, 2005,    except as to the information contained in Note 26 for which    the date is January 16, 2006, relating to the combined    financial statements and financial statement schedule of    Dresser-Rand Company (Predecessor), which appear in this    Form 10-K.     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Houston, Texas    March 7, 2007