alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 9      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

DAVID MEARA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1491

[October 22, 2014]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Sherwood Bauer, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472010CF000638B.

David J. Meara, Carrabelle, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WARNER, J.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s postconviction 

relief motion in which he alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for 

failing to convey his acceptance of the state’s plea offer. He has not met 

the requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 2013).

In cases where a defendant is claiming ineffective assistance of counsel 

in failing to convey a plea offer,1 Alcorn requires that the defendant show

a reasonable probability, defined as a probability sufficient to undermine 

confidence in the outcome, that: (1) he would have accepted the offer; (2) 

the prosecutor would not have withdrawn the offer; (3) the court would 

have accepted the offer; and (4) the conviction or sentence would have been 

less severe than what was imposed. 121 So. 3d at 430. Appellant’s motion 

1 We equate the failure to convey the acceptance of the plea offer to the state as 

“tantamount to failing to communicate a plea offer” to the defendant. See Brown 

v. State, 138 So. 3d 510, 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).
2

does not show a reasonable probability that the prosecutor would not have 

withdrawn the offer had counsel immediately conveyed appellant’s

acceptance of it. It is clear from his own motion that the prosecutor was 

negotiating to obtain testimony against appellant’s co-defendants in 

exchange for a more lenient sentence. When the prosecutor obtained an 

agreement with a defendant in an unrelated case to testify against the 

appellant and his co-defendants in this case, he withdrew the offer to 

appellant. The state may withdraw its offer at any time prior to acceptance 

by the court. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.172(g). These circumstances do not 

show a reasonable probability that the state would have maintained its 

offer when it no longer needed the testimony of appellant.

Appellant also contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to 

request a downward departure sentence and to present mitigating 

evidence to support it. The trial court properly rejected this claim, as the 

court was presented with all of the mitigating evidence in support of 

appellant’s request for a youthful offender sentence. The sentencing judge 

rejected it for that purpose, and appellant cannot show that there was any 

reasonable probability that the judge would have then downwardly 

departed based upon the same reasons.

Affirmed.

GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-2106; MM Docket No. 00-75; RM-9863] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document allots Channel 223C2 to Kahului, Hawaii, as that community's second local FM transmission service, in response to a petition for rule making filed by New West Broadcasting.                         *See*65 FR 33798, May 25, 2000. The allotment requires a site restriction 10.5 kilometers (6.5 miles) southeast of Kahului at coordinates 20-50-24 NL and 156-23-14 WL.                     

# DATES:

Effective October 30, 2000. A filing window for Channel 223C2 at Kahului, Hawaii, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent Order. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-75, adopted September 6, 2000, and released September 15, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Hawaii, is amended by adding Channel 223C2 at Kahului. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-24880 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 4.360

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 168621 dated December 30, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 30, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 14, 2018 No. 660-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4434 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4434

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pyraflufen-ethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pyraflufen-ethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRAFLUFEN-ETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Ethyl 2-chloro-5-   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (4-chloro-5-                                                      12/31/2015
                          difluoromethoxy-1-
                          methyl-1H-pyrazol-
                          3-yl)-4-
                          Fluorophenoxyacet
                          ate (Pyraflufen-
                          ethyl) (CAS No.
                          129630-19-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.19.23)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                  I, Janice Ott Rotunno, a duly elected and acting officer of
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby
certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

                  1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the
Indenture Trustee of the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture under which the Trust's notes
(the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Relevant Year"); and

                  2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above,
and except as provided in the information furnished by the Indenture Trustee for
purposes of the auditor's report delivered pursuant to Section 2.2(a)(x) of the
Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement dated as of April 27,
2004, between AMACAR Pacific Corp. and Allstate Life Global Funding, to the best
of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the Indenture
Trustee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Indenture was performed in accordance
with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year.


J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee


By:      /s/ Janice Ott Rotunno
         -----------------------------------
         Name:  Janice Ott Rotunno
         Title:  Vice President


Date:     March 27, 2006
[logo] PIONEER
       Investments(R)







                                                          May 4, 2007

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
File Desk
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, DC  20549

Re:  Pioneer Real Estate Shares (the "Trust")
     (File Nos. 33-65822 and 811-07870)
     CIK No. 0000908996

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  I certify
that the forms of prospectus  that would have been filed under  paragraph (c) of
Rule 497 do not differ from those contained in  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 25
to the Trust's registration statement on Form N-1A filed electronically with the
Commission on April 30, 2007 (Accession No. 0000908996-07-000009).

     If  you  have  any   questions  or  comments   concerning   the   foregoing
certification, please contact me at (617) 517-8909.

                                                 Very truly yours,




                                                 /s/ Nancy Fanning
                                                 Nancy Fanning
                                                 Senior Legal Product Manager

cc:  Christopher J. Kelley, Esq.
     Christopher P. Harvey, Esq.







Pioneer Investment Management, Inc.
60 State Street
Boston, MA  02109-1820



 "Member of the UniCredito Italiano Banking Group, Register of Banking Groups."
#### FORESTER v. STATE.

No. 24075.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for child desertion and punishment assessed at ninety days in jail.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Kansas Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Oklahoma (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Kansas Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Oklahoma (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 24     | 25     | 5      | 0      | 23     | 44     | 52     | 43    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 4.378

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 170427 dated February 17, 2019

 

To render

 

data transmission services for voice

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

February 17, 2024

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 816-рчс dated November 30, 2018

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Keith Kelson, Chief Financial Officer of Securus Technologies, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/KEITH KELSON             |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Keith Kelson                |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*** |
|   | April 10, 2008              |
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Texas--RRC District 6 Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 173    | 1,161 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,381  | 6,584  | 4,172  | 4,633  | 3,979  | 3,474  | 3,249  | 8,909  | 18,690 | 17,026
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 16,224 | 20,453 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### Midlantic Commercial Leasing Corp., Respondent, v D.B.A. Knits, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about December 15, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s mo*118tion for summary judgment, directed entry of judgment against defendant Romonel Knitting Mills, Inc. in the amount of $358,855.50, and directed defendants to assemble and turn over certain equipment to plaintiff or plaintiff’s designee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court properly directed defendants to surrender certain equipment in which defendants had granted plaintiff a security interest. The contention that a nonparty holds a security interest in the same property superior to that held by plaintiff is wholly irrelevant in this action, since the mere existence of a lien potentially senior to plaintiff’s constitutes no defense (UCC 9-312). Plaintiff’s case against said defendant was sufficiently established by the 1979 security agreement between the parties (UCC 9-203) without any need to refer to perfection thereof or to resolve any potential dispute as to priority between plaintiff and a nonparty, which is of no concern to said defendant debtor. The priority dispute should be resolved, if at all, in appropriate proceedings in which both secured parties are parties to the action. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.