Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

          - 30 CFR Part 926
          - [SPATS No. MT-020-FOR] 

# AGENCY:

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public hearing on proposed amendment.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Montana regulatory program (hereinafter, the “Montana program”) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Montana proposed revisions to, and additions of statutes about, the definition of what constitutes a mine operator, the notice requirements for alternate reclamation plans; the use of introduced species on lands mined, disturbed, or redisturbed after May 2, 1978, and reseeded prior to January 1, 1984; a new statute section concerning subsidence; and other editorial revisions. Montana intends to revise its program to be consistent with SMCRA, provide additional safeguard, clarify ambiguities, and improve operational efficiency.

# DATES:

We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m., m.d.t. October 25, 2000. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on October 20, 2000. We will accept requests to speak until 4 p.m., m.d.t. on October 10, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

You should mail, hand deliver, or e-mail written comments and requests to speak at the hearing to Guy Padgett at the address listed below.

You may review copies of the Montana program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in response to this document at the addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Casper Field Office.

Guy Padgett, Director, Casper Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 100 East “B” Street, Federal Building, Room 2128, Casper, Wyoming 82601-1918, Telephone: (307) 261-6550.

Steve Welch, Chief, Industrial and Energy Minerals Bureau, Montana Department of Environmental Quality, 1520 E. Sixth Ave., P.O. Box 200901, Helena, MT 59620-0901, Telephone: (406) 444-4964.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Guy Padgett, Telephone: (307) 261-6550. Internet: gpadgett@osmre.gov.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Montana Program.

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment.

III. Public Comment Procedures.

IV. Procedural Determinations.

## I. Background on the Montana Program

                    On April 1, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Montana program. You can find background information on the Montana program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of the Montana program in the April 1, 1980,                     **Federal Register**                     (45 FR 21560). You can also find later actions concerning Montana's program and program amendments at 30 CFR 926.15, 926.16, and 926.30.                

## II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

                    By letters dated July 20 and August 17, 2000, Montana sent us a proposed amendment to its program (Administrative Record No. MT-17-01) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201*et seq.*). Montana sent the amendment in response to a June 5, 1996, letter (Administrative Record No. MT-17-03) that we sent to Montana in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c), and to include the changes made at its own initiative by the 1997 State legislature. In addition, Montana has included revisions from the 1995 State legislature which OSM approved in the January 22, 1999,                     **Federal Register**                     (64 FR 3604). The full text of this program amendment is available for you to read at the locations listed above under                     **ADDRESSES**                    .                

The provisions of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA) that Montana proposes to revise or add are: 82-4-203(21), MCA (Definitions); 82-4-232(7), MCA (Area mining required-bond-alternative plan); 82-4-233, MCA (Planting of vegetation following grading of disturbed area); 82-4-243, MCA (Subsidence); 82-4-253(2), MCA (Suit for damage to water supply); and 82-4-254(4), MCA (Violation-Penalty-Waiver).

Specifically, Montana proposes to revise the Montana program to (1) include uranium mining using in situ methods in the definition of operator; (2) require newspaper publication of alternate reclamation plans; (3) allow introduced species to compose a major or dominant component of the reclaimed vegetation for lands mined, disturbed, or redisturbed after May 2, 1978, and seeded prior to January 1, 1984; (4) allow for the prompt repair or compensation for material damage to any occupied residential dwelling and related structures and to any noncommercial building resulting from subsidence caused by underground mining operations; (5) promptly replace any drinking, domestic, or residential water supply from a well or spring that was in existence prior to the permit application that has been affected by contamination, diminution, or interruption resulting from underground coal mining operations; (6) include an editorial revision to MCA 82-4-253(2); and (7) propose a revision at MCA 82-4-254(4) to reflect the 1995 State reorganization to designate a director of environmental quality.

## III. Public Comment Procedures

Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM requests your comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it will become part of the Montana program.

### Written Comments

                    Send your written comments to OSM at the address given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of your recommendations. In the final rulemaking, we will not necessarily consider or include in the Administrative Record any comments received after the time indicated under “                    **DATES**                    ” or at locations other than the Casper Field Office.                

### Electronic Comments

                    Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special                           ( print page 57584)                        characters and any form of encryption. Please also include “Attn: SPATS No. MT-020-FOR” and your name and return address in your Internet meassage. If you do not receive a confirmation that we have received your Internet message, contact the Casper Field Office at (307) 261-6550.                

### Availability of Comments

We will make comments, including names and addresses of respondents, available for public review during normal business hours. We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public review in their entirety.

### Public Hearing

                    If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     by 4 p.m., m.d.t. on October 10, 2000. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    . We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.                

To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone schedule to speak has been heard. If you are in the audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will end the hearing after everyone schedule to speak and others present in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.

### Public Meeting

                    If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    . All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under                     **ADDRESSES**                    . We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the Administrative Record.                

## IV. Procedural Determinations

### Executive Order 12630—Takings

This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulations.

### Executive Order 12866—Regulatory Planning and Review

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Executive Order 12866.

### Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice Reform

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required by section 3 of Executive order 12988 and had determined that, to the extent allowable by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.

### Executive Order 13132—Federalism

This rule does not have Federalism implications within the meaning of Executive Order 13132. SMCRA delineates the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of the purposes of SMCRA is to “establish a nationwide program to protect society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal mining operations.” Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be “in accordance with” the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that State programs contain rules and regulations “consistent with” regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.

### National Environmental Policy Act

Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that a decision on a proposed State regulatory program provision does not constitute a major Federal action within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). A determination has been made that such decisions are categorically excluded from the NEPA process (516 DM 8.4.A).

### Paperwork Reduction Act

                    This rule does not contain information collection requirements that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507*et seq.*).                

### Regulatory Flexibility Act

                    The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (4 U.S.C. 601*et seq.*). The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements established by SMCRA or previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In making the determination as to whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.                

### Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

                    This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule (a) does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, geographic regions, or Federal, State or local governmental agencies; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made that the Federal                           ( print page 57585)                        regulation was not considered a major rule.                

### Unfunded Mandates

This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.

# List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 926

      - Intergovernmental relations
      - Surface mining
      - Underground mining

Dated: September 19, 2000.

Brent Wahlquist,

Regional Director, Western Regional Coordinating Center.

[FR Doc. 00-24580 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M