alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                       |   |                                              |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                              |   |
| Dated:      March 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Michael Fonstein                         |   |
|                       |   | Michael      Fonstein                             |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer                      |   |
|                       |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                |   |
|                       |   |                                              |   |
|                       |   |                                              |   |
| Dated:      March 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/      John A. Marhofer, Jr.                    |   |
|                       |   | John      A. Marhofer, Jr.                        |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Financial Officer                      |   |
|                       |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

| * | This      certification accompanies the Annual Report to which it relates, is not      deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be      incorporated by reference into any filing of Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. under      the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual      Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in      such filing. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4629 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4629

 To require the Comptroller General to conduct an annual audit of the 
                    General Services Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

  Mr. Denham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
  Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Comptroller General to conduct an annual audit of the 
                    General Services Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNUAL AUDIT.

    (a) Initial and Annual Audit.--Not later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act and by the end of every subsequent fiscal 
year thereafter, the Comptroller General shall conduct an extensive 
audit described in subsection (b) of the General Services 
Administration and report such findings to the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (b) Detailed Information.--The audit referred to in subsection (a) 
shall include detailed information for each region regarding specific 
administrative costs; conference spending; bonuses; travel expenses; 
staffing levels; expenditures on buildings classified as excess, 
surplus, or underutilized; a detailed accounting of the expenditures of 
the Federal Buildings Fund; and any other information the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of 
Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 
of the Senate, may request.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JuniperPartners Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) onForm 10-KSB for the period ended December  31,  2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|                  |  |        |  |                                                                                                            |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|------------------|--|--------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| March  30,  2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Stuart B. Rekant                                                                                       |
|             |  |   |  | Stuart B. RekantChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer(Principal Executive Officer)                           |
| March  30,  2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Robert B. Becker                                                                                       |
|             |  |   |  | Robert B. BeckerChief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Accounting and FinancialOfficer) |
|                  |

----
[Cite as Walsh v. Walsh , 2022
- Ohio
- 1101.]



## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY KENNETH J. WALSH,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

- v - CARMELLA A. WALSH,

Petitioner

- Appellee. CASE NO. 2022 - A - 0004
Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas

Trial Court No. 2016 DR 00334

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Decided: March 31, 2022 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Kenneth J. Walsh , pro se, 1144 Lloyd Road, Wickliffe, OH 44092 (Petitioner

- Appellant). Darya Jeffreys Klammer, The Klammer Law Office, Ltd., 7482 Center Street, Unit 6, Mentor, OH 44060 (For Petitioner

- Appellee).
JOHN J. EKLUND, J. {¶1} On February 14, 2022, a ppellant, Kenneth J. Walsh, filed a pro se appeal from a February 4, 2022 judgment entry of t he Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas

. In that entry , the trial court merely affirmed and adopted a July 15, 2021 magistrate’s decision , but did not issue its own judgment separate from the magistrate’s decision

. {¶2} Appellee, Carmella A. Walsh, through counsel, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final appealable order

. Appellant opposed the motion. {¶3} Initially, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order since this court may entertain o nly those appeals from final judgments or orders . Noble v.2

Case No. 2022

- A

- 0004 Colwell , 44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, a judgment of a trial court can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court only if it constitu tes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst , 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003

- L

- 116, 2003

- Ohio

- 6241, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen

. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am. , 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). {¶4} The mere adoption of a magistrate ’ s decision d oes not constitute a final appealable order. In re Castrovince (Aug. 16, 1996), 11th Dist. Portage No. 96

- P

- 0175, 1996 WL 1056815, at 1. This court has stated it is not sufficient for a final appealable order that a trial court merely incorporate by reference the recommendations of a magistrate ’ s decision. Id

. Rather, the decision and the trial cour t ’ s judgment must be

“ separate and distinct instruments which are complete and independent of each other. ” Id

. ; see also Sed v. Mundy , 11th Dist. Portage No. 2015

- P

- 0068, 2015

- Ohio

- 5221, at ¶ 7. {¶5} Here , the February 4, 2022 trial court entry merely adopted the magistrate’s decision

. The trial court did not issue its own “separate and distinct” order setting forth the court’s ruling on the matter. {¶6} Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appe al is hereby dismissed for lack of a final appealable order

.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J. , MARY JANE TRAPP, J. ,
concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00564-CV

Keith Volk, Appellant

v.

Coryell County Sheriff’s Office, Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-21-000290, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Keith Volk and Coryell County Sheriff’s Office have filed a Joint Motion for 

Entry of Agreed Judgment, announcing that they have reached an agreement that resolves their 

dispute. We grant the motion. Consistent with their motion, we set aside the trial court’s 

judgment without regard to the merits and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

_________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Set Aside and Remanded

Filed: July 12, 2023
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

 

In connection with the filing of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the“Report”) by Sonesta International Hotels Corporation (the “Company”), we, PeterJ. Sonnabend, Stephanie Sonnabend and Boy A. J. van Riel, in our respectivepositions of CEO & Vice Chairman, CEO & President and Treasurer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that, to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Boston, August 5, 2004 |
|--------|------------------------|
|   |                   |
|   | /S/                    | Peter J.  Sonnabend |   |
|   | Name:                  | Peter J.  Sonnabend |
|   | Title:                 | Chief  Executive Officer and Vice Chairman |
|   |                   |
|   |                   |
|   | /S/                    | Stephanie Sonnabend |   |
|   | Name:                  | Stephanie  Sonnabend |
|   | Title:                 | Chief Executive  Officer and President |
|   |                   |
|   |                   |
|   | /S/                    | Boy van Riel |   |
|   | Name:                  | Boy A. J.  van Riel |
|   | Title:                 | Vice  President and Treasurer |
|        |                        |  |  |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 24
  
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  th
 /s/ Nicholas W. Alexos
    
    /s/ Robert L. BarchiNicholas W. Alexos
    
    Robert L. Barchi/s/ Edward A. Blechschmidt
    
    /s/ Thompson DeanEdward A. Blechschmidt
    
    Thompson Dean/s/ Robert P. DeCresce
    
    /s/ Carlos del SaltoRobert P. DeCresce
    
    Carlos del Salto/s/ Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr.
    
    /s/ Timothy P. SullivanHarry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr.
    
    Timothy P. Sullivan/s/ Robert J. Zollars
    
    /s/ Pamela Forbes LiebermanRobert J. Zollars
    
    Pamela Forbes Lieberman
#### Practical Constructors, Ltd., Respondent, v Patrick McCarthy et al., Appellants.

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.), entered July 3, 1989.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Hentel in the Supreme Court, Queens County. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SADIK BAXTER
, Appellant,

v.

ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 912

[ December 7, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John Thomas Luzzo , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 00793 (09)

.

Sadik Baxter, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Louis Reinstein, of Kelley Kronenberg, Plantation, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### T. S. PARK, Appellant, v. Craig WOOD et al., Appellees.

No. 14803.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

June 27, 1947.

William Pannill, of Fort Worth, and Hardway, Harwell, Smith & Gwin, of Houston, for appellant. •

McGown, McGown, Godfrey & Logan, Harry L. Logan, Jr., and B. E. Godfrey, all of Fort Worth, for appellees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

In view of the opinion of the Supreme Court delivered on June 18, 1947, in Park v. Wood et al., 203 S.W.2d 204, the judgment heretofore rendered by this court on January 24, 1947, is hereby set aside, and our former opinion, reported in 199 S.W.2d 816, is hereby withdrawn, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and judgment is hereby rendered sustaining the plea of privilege filed by the defendant T. S. Park.
**KPMG
                    LLP**
                Telephone
                314-444-1400Suite
                    900
                Fax
                312-444-147010
                    South Broadway
                Internet
                www.us.kpmg.comSt.
                    Louis, MO 63102-1761
    Independent
        Accountants' Report
  The
        Boards of Driectors
 CitiMortgage,
        Inc. and CitiMortgage Asset Management, Inc.:
  We
        have
        examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
        assertion, that CitiMortgage,
        Inc. and subsidiaries and CitiMortgage Asset Management, Inc. (collectively
        referred to as the
        Company), complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
        Mortgage Bankers Association
        of America's *Uniform
        Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* as
        of and
        for the year ended
        December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
        with
        those minimum
        servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
        assertion about the
        Company's compliance based on our examination.
  Our
        examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
        by the American Institute
        of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on
        a test
        basis, evidence about
        the
        Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above
        and
        performing such
        other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
        that our examination provides
        a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
        determination on the Company's
        compliance with the minimum servicing standards.
  In
        our
        opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
        aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
        31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
  /s/
        KPMG LLP
  St.
        Louis, Missouri
 March
        3,
        2006
  KPMG
        LLP,
        a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
 member
        firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4587 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4587

         To extend the suspension of duty on Reactive Red 266.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the suspension of duty on Reactive Red 266.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 266.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.44 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Reactive Red 266) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of NTK Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Richard L.
Bready


Name: Richard L.
Bready


Title:    President
and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C.
Hall


Name:Almon C. Hall


Title:VicePresident and ChiefFinancialOfficer
#### STEWART v. STATE.

No. 23286.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 6, 1946.

Baskett & Parks, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. Therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
----

| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1)    | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/      William D. Edwards,      Jr.                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William D.      Edwards, Jr.                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | (Principal      Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                                            |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ANTHONY D. SHIELDS,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

PENNSY L VANIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of December , 2023, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.