alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RICHBURG et al. v. FORE.

No. 2517.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Oct. 5, 1945.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1945,

Dabney & Dabney, of Eastland, for appellants.

T. R. Odell, of Haskell, for appellee.

GRISSOM, Justice.

On February 10, 1945, judgment was rendered overruling appellants’ pleas of privilege. On the same day the court rendered a separate judgment for the plaintiff in said cause on the merits. No exception to or notice of appeal from either of said judgments appear in the record. See Texas Rules Civil Procedure 385; Rausch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., Tex.Civ.App., 70 S.W.2d 655; Denton County v. Lowrey, Tex.Civ.App., 156 S.W.2d 546; 20 Texas Law Review 47; Evans v. Ellis, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W. 294; Smith Bros. Grain Co. v. Windsor & Stanley, Tex.Com.App., 255 S.W. 158; 3 Tex.Jur. 415. On March 2, 1945, appellants executed an appeal bond which recited that on the 10th of February, 1945, said court “overruled the pleas of privilege of defendants, W. E. Richburg and Jack Pinkston, from which judgment the said W. E. Richburg and Jack Pinkston desire to take an appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals * * There was no appeal from the judgment on the merits. That judgment has become final. Since the judgment on the merits has become final, the questions presented to this court on appeal from the order overruling appellants’ pleas of privilege are moot. No disposition that this court could make of the judgment overruling appellants’ pleas of privilege would be effective to give appellants any relief from the final judgment against them on the merits of the case. It has been so held in the following cases: Motor Securities Corp. v. Jones, Tex.Civ.*165App., 90 S.W.2d 858, 859; A. B. Richards Medicine Co. v. Avant, Tex.Civ.App., 275 S.W. 260; McNeill v. Hubert, 119 Tex. 18, 23 S.W.2d 331; Panhandle Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Badgett, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 466, 468. See also Allen v. Woodward, 111 Tex. 457, 460, 239 S.W. 602, 22 A.L.R. 1253; Alford v. Humphrey, Tex.Civ.App., 154 S.W.2d 238, and 3 Tex. Jur. 68 and 966.

No statement of facts is before this court. The judgment overruling appellants’ ■pleas of privilege recites that evidence was heard. In Gohlman, Lester & Co. v. Griffith, Tex.Com.App., 245 S.W. 233, the court held that in the absence of a statement of facts showing the testimony heard on a plea of privilege, and in the absence of an affirmative showing that no evidence was adduced at such hearing, it would be presumed on appeal that evidence was introduced that justified overruling the plea of privilege. This holding was expressly approved by the Supreme Court. See Grand United Order of Odd Fellows v. Massey, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 310; Earley-Foster Co. v. United Sugar Companies, Tex.Civ.App., 237 S.W. 322; Pacific American Gasoline Co. v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 74 S. W.2d 720.

Since the issues involved in the appeal from the order overruling the pleas of privilege are moot, we have no authority to make any other disposition of the appeal than to order it dismissed. The appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 24, 2009
----

**Greenwich      Capital Commercial Funding Corp.**

**Series      2005-GG3**

**Annual      Statement as to Compliance **

**For      Period of February 10, 2005 through December 31, 2005**

| (i.)   | A                    review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special                    Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this                    Agreement, has been made under my supervision.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii.)  | To                    the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial                    Mortgage                    as Special Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its                    obligations under this Agreement throughout the period. However,                    during the period of February 10, 2005 through December 31, 2005,                    GMAC                    Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer did not service any Specially                    Serviced Mortgaged Loans.  |
| (iii.) | GMAC                    Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer has received no notice                    regarding                    qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund                    as a REMIC or                    of the Grantor Trust as a "grantor trust" under the Grantor Trust                    Provisions from the Internal Revenue Service or any other                    governmental agency or body.                                                                                            |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet and income  statements for the  thirty-nine  week period ended October 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 42,974
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         362,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         1,753,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,239,220
<PP&E>                                              6,609,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2,301,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      8,679,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,999,622
<BONDS>                                             3,335,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              299,778
<OTHER-SE>                                          2,196,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        8,679,001
<SALES>                                            14,670,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   14,670,458
<CGS>                                              10,785,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      10,785,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    176,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       411,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                          176,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   234,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          234,766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .86<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .85<F1>
<FN>
<F1> EPS are not in (000's)
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
MRI Industry: Review of Proposed Accessibility Standards

U.S. Access Board

May 8, 2012

Atlanta, Georgia

Milind Dhamankar MD

Siemens Healthcare

Sr. Director Product Marketing

MRI is Complex

 Installation needs a RF cabin

[Diagram consisting of illustrations and a photo: Arrangement of image shows basic MRI 

concepts and their relationships. On one side of the diagram is a cartoon image of a body 

showing basic organ systems with the caption “hydrogen protons “and “65% H2O”. On the 

other side is a magnetic resonance image of a torso identifying a spot with the caption 

“computer to reconstruct images”. Cartoon images of a magnet with caption “magnet “and of 

a radio with caption “radio frequency energy” are shown between the body and torso images. 

A large arrow accompanying the magnet and radio points toward the torso image]

Ferrous materials within magnet room is a hazard!

[Graphic Icon: do-not-symbol over letters “MR”.]

[Photo: Oxygen cylinder is stuck to the magnetic part of a MRI machine.]

[Photo: IV pole is stuck to the magnetic part of a MRI machine.]

[Photo: Danger sign indicating restricted access because of magnetism.]

Chapter M3: MRI

 Proposed requirements

o M301.2

o M305.2

o M301.4

 Current Abilities

o MRIs designed to effectively image patients of all ages and sizes (up to table 

weight capacity/bore size)

o “MRI conditional” wheel-chair, transport trolley, patient transport shells are 

available

o For MRI – Free standing overhead track lifts may be challenging due to the 

magnet, but MR compatible lifts possible.

[Photo: Patient on equipment scanning bed, lying on their side for a MRI of their back.]

[Photo: MR image of patient’s back scan.]
Chapter M3: MRI

 Proposed requirements

o M301.2

o M305.2

o M301.4

 Current Abilities

o MRI table tops have patient positioning cushions, safety straps, side rails, iv 

stand holders and emergency pull–out mechanisms

o Newer high-density, ultra-light coils come in all sizes ranging from extra-small 

loop coils to XXL body coils.

[Photo: Several positioning cushions.]

[Photo: MRI coil on a patient’s elbow.]

[Photo: MRI coil on a patient’s shoulder.]

Patient Communication Advisory M306.1 

 Proposed requirements

o M306.1

 Improvement in patient communication during MRI exam

 Current Abilities

 Current MR systems comply with this requirement

 Patient communication unit

o Intercom communication with the patient

o Patient alert system (squeeze-bulb)

 No radiation in MRI allows presence of patient relative / help next to the patient to 

coordinate tactile communication

Moving Forward

 MRI manufacturers are committed to providing medical device access for all patients 

and are thankful for the opportunity to participate in standards development with the 

United States Access Board.

Thank You
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Gerald J. Burnett       |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ ROBERT J.  HABIG    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Robert J. Habig         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13     | -16    | 36     | -17    | -10    | 21     | -9     | -61    | 34     | -48   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 113    | 13     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2158 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14901 Adelfa Drive in La Mirada, California, 

as the ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2158 RFS

1 SECTION 1. WAYNE GRISHAM POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 14901 Adelfa Drive in La 

4 Mirada, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Wayne M. Rehberger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and     
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003



| | /s/ Wayne M. Rehberger
Wayne M. Rehberger
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 12     | 9      | 4      | 6      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to Registration Statement No. 333-109688 on Form N-4 of the Lincoln Benefit Life Variable Annuity Account ("the Account") of our report dated April 1, 2019, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights within Note 7 of the Account, and relating to the financial statements and the related financial statement schedules of Lincoln Benefit Life Company of our report dated April 1, 2019, both appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of the Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 11, 2019
MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 19th, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Neal Fann, EPA

SUBJECT: Meeting with the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services

Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants –

September 19th, 2014

SUMMARY

EPA staff and the attendees listed below met on September 14th, to discuss the proposed 

Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA

Neal Fann (phone)

Jackie Ashley (phone)

MaryBeth Smuts (phone, EPA R1)

David Conroy (phone, EPA R1)

New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services

Matt Cahilla (phone)
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of


Cleveland BioLabs,
Inc.:





We consent to the use in the Form 10-K
of Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008and the incorporation by reference in
the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-140687)of the Company of our report dated March
27, 2009, with respect to the balance sheets of Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ending December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.





/s/ Meaden & Moore,
Ltd.





Cleveland,Ohio


March 27, 2009