alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|West Virginia Natural Gas Processed in West Virginia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|West Virginia Natural Gas Processed in West Virginia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |           | 116,955   | 189,278   | 315,229 | 867,111 | 1,090,383 | 1,174,529 | 1,522,070 | 1,606,506 | 1,873,126
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,115,542 | 2,140,724 | 2,143,538 |         |         |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|No chart available.                                               
|No chart available.                                               
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005



[Litton Loan Servicing LP logo]



			LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP
			An affiliate of C_BASS


4828 Loop Central Drive 		Telephone (713) 966-8801
Houston, Texas 77081			Fax (713) 960-0539


February 23, 2006

Structured Finance
U.S. Bank National Association
60 Livingston Ave.
SL Paul, MN 55107


RE: 2005-CB1 Trust, C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates,
    Series 2005-CB1


To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual
Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies that
(i) a review to the activities of the Service during such preceding
fiscal year (or such shorter period in the case of the first such report)
and of performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement
for 2005.

Sincerely,


/s/Janice McClure				/s/Ann Kelley
Senior Vice President				Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4562 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4562

      To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Acetylnicotinic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mr. Luetkemeyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the suspension of duty on 2-Acetylnicotinic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLNICOTINIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Acetylnicotinic acid) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

REPUBLIC COMPANIES GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES



|1. | Republic Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in 2003.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Republic Home Protectors, Inc., a Texas corporation formed in 2004.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Republic Group No. Two Company, a Missouri corporation formed in 1965.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Eagle General Agency, Inc., a Texas corporation formed in 1974.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Republic Underwriters Insurance Company, a Texas corporation formed in 1965.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | RIG Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust formed in 2003.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | RIG Capital Statutory Trust II, a Connecticut statutory trust form in 2003.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|8. | Southern County Mutual Insurance Company, a Texas county mutual formed in 1955.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|9. | Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation formed in 1981.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|10. | Southern Underwriters Insurance Company, an Oklahoma corporation formed in 1997.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|11. | Republic Diversified Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in 1993.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|12. | Southern Vanguard Insurance Company, a Texas corporation formed in 1998.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



|13. | Republic Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, an Oklahoma corporation formed in 1997.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|14. | Republic Lloyds, a Texas lloyds plan formed in 1954.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------



|15. | Southern Insurance Company, a Texas corporation formed in 1947.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|16. | Seguros Atlas, S.A., a corporation formed in 1941 under the laws of the Republic of Mexico.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Ex parte BOMAN.

No. 27040.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1954.

See also 246.S.W.2d 203.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the Texas Prison System, seeks his discharge, alleging that the judgment of conviction against him is void for the following reasons.

According to his application, the relator was convicted of felony theft upon an indictment alleging two prior convictions and sentenced to life imprisonment, He contends that he was deprived of a trial in accordance with due process because the entire indictment was read to the jury before they had reached a verdict on his guilt as to the primary offense, This Court has recently in Redding. v, State, 265 S.W.Zd 811, overruled such a contention.

Relator contends that Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., is unconstitutional in that it is not uniformly applied and administered by the different prosecutors throughout the State. Pie claims that 70% of the accuseds who are indicted under such Article are allowed to plead guilty to the primary offense and that portion of the indictment alleging the prior convictions is dismissed. We are supplied with no proof that relator’s figures are accurate, but even if they were this would not render the Act unconstitutional. The fact that a law may not be invoked against others could not in anywise affect its constitutionality because invoked against relator. As written, it is capable of uniform enforcement.

Relator contends that Article 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., is unconstitutional because it deprives the district judges of *187the power to discharge a person convicted of crime. He contends that the district judges are in a better position to pas? upon credibility of the witnesses than . is the Court of Criminal Appeals. Be that as it may, the Legislature has designated this tribunal as the forum for decision. So long as a court is open to hear writs of habeas corpus, then the requirements of due process are met.

The application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
#### Joseph BERGER, Appellant, v. CORONADO HOTEL COMPANY et al.

No. 10970.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 6, 1937.

Robert L. Aronson, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Rassieur, Long & Yawitz, David Levinson, and Joseph II. Grand, all of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for allowance of appeal from orders of United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4492 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4492

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on MCPB Acid and MCPB Sodium 
                                 Salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on MCPB Acid and MCPB Sodium 
                                 Salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MCPB ACID AND MCPB SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.94 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to MCPB Acid and MCPB Sodium 
Salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4708 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on fludioxonil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

fludioxonil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUDIOXONIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.54 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 fludioxonil) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.0%’’ and inserting ‘‘5.7%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4708 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOLITRON
DEVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 31,1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         714,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,115,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (34,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,556,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,570,000
<PP&E>                                       1,719,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,153,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,973,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,319,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,973,000
<SALES>                                      2,103,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,103,000
<CGS>                                        1,554,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,891,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                121,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            120,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4476 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Prodiamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

Prodiamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODIAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Prodiamine) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘2.1%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4476 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Israel Discount Bank of New York, Respondent, v 500 Fifth Avenue Associates et al., Defendants, and Jerry Williams et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered December 22, 1989, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, and denied the cross motion by defendants Williams and Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment in lieu of complaint on defendants’ written personal guarantees of a promissory note made by the defendant corporation by establishing execution, delivery, demand and failure to pay. *(European Am. Bank & Trust Co. v Schirripa,*108 AD2d 684.) The defendants fail to substantiate, in evidentiary form, their conclusory contention that the promissory note upon which the underlying action was predicated was repaid, extended or satisfied by the issuance of a second promissory note in the same amount as the original note, with a different maturity date. In any event, the defendants would remain liable since their guarantees contemplated extensions, renewals and replacements of the underlying indebtedness. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting

|Date:  August 10, 2006 | Signed:  /s/  Ruth Swan          
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                       | Ruth Swan
Chief Financial Officer