Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1077 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Sutherland 3000 E Main Street Rd. Marshalltown

IA 50158 3000 E Main Street Rd. Marshalltown

IA 50158

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note TRUE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification No Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 4Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 5Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 6Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 7Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 8Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 9Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 10Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 11Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 12Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 13Facility _Information
Facility : SutherlandThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1077 1 Manager Environmental Services Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradleypincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 1077 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1077 petroleum coke 3.32 5.41 1077 subbituminous 96.68 94.59

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1077 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Oil/water separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Oily

water TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Used oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Used oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1077 Water based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 1077 1 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 420.2 401.5 31 1077 2 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 420.2 375.6 30.9 1077 3 Cyclone firing Wet Bottom coal 810 839 82.3

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 28.8 84.3 84.9 875 875 1.12 1.13 FALSE 1.14 29.6 84.3 84.6 875 875 1.16 1.17 FALSE 1.18 76.9 88.5 87.7 1500 1500 1.21 1.22 FALSE 1.23

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.15 7498 69 N FALSE FALSE 1.19 6427 59 N FALSE FALSE 1.24 5345 61 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1077 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.68 1077 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.3 1077 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 95.01 1077 1 natural gas 2007 0.29 1077 1 natural gas 2008 0.7 1077 1 natural gas 2009 2.08 1077 1 petroleum coke 2007 0.03 1077 1 petroleum coke 2009 2.91 1077 2 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.69 1077 2 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.07 1077 2 coal - subbituminous 2009 97.71 1077 2 natural gas 2007 0.28 1077 2 natural gas 2008 0.93 1077 2 natural gas 2009 1.57 1077 2 petroleum coke 2007 0.03 1077 2 petroleum coke 2009 0.72 1077 3 coal - subbituminous 2007 73.53 1077 3 coal - subbituminous 2008 73.38 1077 3 coal - subbituminous 2009 79.68 1077 3 natural gas 2007 2.65 1077 3 natural gas 2008 3.02 1077 3 natural gas 2009 11.91 1077 3 petroleum coke 2007 23.82 1077 3 petroleum coke 2008 23.6 1077 3 petroleum coke 2009 8.41

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1077 1 Low NOx Burner 5/1/2003 1077 2 Low NOx Burner 5/1/2003 1077 3 Overfire Air 12/1/2009

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 1077 1 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1991 1077 2 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1991 1077 3 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1991

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 1077 1 1077 2 1077 3

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1077 1 1 1077 2 2 1077 3 3

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1077 ESP-1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 11/1/1976 1077 ESP-2 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 11/1/1976 1077 ESP-3 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 11/1/1976 1077 RRI-3 NOx control Other (specify)

Rich Reagent Injection (RRI)

FALSE 9/1/2009 Urea 1077 SNCR-3 NOx control Selective Noncataly

tic Reduction FALSE 9/1/2009 Urea

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1077 ESP Inlet-3 1077 Stack-1 1077 Stack-2 1077 Stack-3

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1077 Unit 1 Stack 249 9.5 1077 Unit 2 Stack 249 9.5 1077 Unit 3 Stack 249 10

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1077 Unit 1 1077 Unit 2 1077 Unit 3

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1077 Unit 1 1 1 Unit 1077 Unit 1 ESP-1 2 PM control 1077 Unit 1 Stack-1 3 Sam pling Port next 1077 Unit 1 Unit 1 Stack 4 Stack 1077 Unit 2 2 1 Unit 1077 Unit 2 ESP-2 2 PM control 1077 Unit 2 Stack-2 3 Sam pling Port next 1077 Unit 2 Unit 2 Stack 4 Stack 1077 Unit 3 3 1 Unit 1077 Unit 3 ESP Inlet-3 4 Sam pling Port next 1077 Unit 3 ESP-3 5 PM control 1077 Unit 3 RRI-3 2 NOx control 1077 Unit 3 SNCR-3 3 NOx control 1077 Unit 3 Stack-3 6 Sam pling Port next 1077 Unit 3 Unit 3 Stack 7 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1077 Unit 3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

3.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

24 hours 1077 Unit 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.38 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 625 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1077 Unit 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1.9 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

24 hours 1077 Unit 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.4 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1077 Unit 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

73.7 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1077 Unit 2 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.38 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 625 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1077 Unit 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1.9 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

24 hours 1077 Unit 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.4 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 1077 Unit 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

73.7 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1077 Unit 3 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.38 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 625 pound per hour (lb/hr)

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping 24 hour calendar day

average. No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide and Airflow. This monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. This owner or operator shall maintain a record of the SO2 emitted (lb/mmBtu) per calendar day
. pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim it 1 is a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for single unit 1.Limit 2 s a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for all 3 units (U1, U2, & U3). No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency 24 hour calendar day

average. No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide and Airflow. This monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. n/a No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide and Airflow. This monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of the NOx emitted (in pounds per MMBtu) per day and calculate a thirty-day rolling average. This is a 3 run average. No n/a n/a pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim it 1 is a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for single unit 2.Limit 2 s a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for all 3 units (U1, U2, & U3). No Stack tests, ESP Agency O & M Plan ESP Agency 24 hour calendar day

average. No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide and Airflow. This monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. n/a No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide and Airflow. This monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of Title V Operating Permit and 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of the NOx emitted (in pounds per MMBtu) per day and calculate a thirty-day rolling average. This is a 3 run average. No n/a n/a pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim it 1 is a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for single unit 3.Limit 2 s a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensible for all 3 units (U1, U2, & U3). No Stack tests, ESP Angency O & M Plan ESP Angency

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. n/a ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. n/a ESP Angency

O & M Plan

Page 38configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 39configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 40configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 41control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 42control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 43control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 44control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 45control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 46control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 47control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 48control_costs

CBI

Page 49mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 50mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 51fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 1077 200901-Coal 1/1/2009 20394.52 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200902-Coal 2/1/2009 10295.04 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200903-Coal 3/1/2009 34319.5 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 35097.69 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 21380.74 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 31756.41 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 32210.13 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 10697.4 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 31475.43 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 21277.77 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 31731.52 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1077 200912-Coal

12/1/2009 10492.89 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell

Page 52fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Page 53fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1077 200901-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200901-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200901-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200902-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200902-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200902-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200903-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200903-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200903-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200904-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200904-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200904-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200905-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200905-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200905-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200906-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200906-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200906-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200907-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200907-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200907-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200908-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200908-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200908-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200909-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200909-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200909-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200910-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200910-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200910-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200911-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200911-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200911-Coal

Unit 3 1077 200912-Coal

Unit 1 1077 200912-Coal

Unit 2 1077 200912-Coal

Unit 3

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 56fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 58fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 59test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

compliance Mercury testing at Unit 1 Stack 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 No No 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 1 Stack 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 No No 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 1 Stack 7/16/2008 7/16/2008 No No 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

compliance Mercury testing at Unit 2 Stack 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 No No 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 2 Stack 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 No No 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 2 Stack 7/17/2008 7/17/2008 No No 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing at Unit 3 Stack 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

compliance Mercury testing at Unit 3 Stack 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

other Diagnostic Mercury testing at Unit 3 Stack 9/27/2006 9/27/2006 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

other Diagnostic Diagnostic Hg testing at Unit 3 Stack 7/26/2007 7/26/2007 No No 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

other Diagnostic Mercury testing at Unit 3 ESP Inlet 9/27/2006 9/27/2006 No No 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 3 Stack 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 No No 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 3 Stack 7/15/2008 7/15/2008 No No

Page 60test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Page 61test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Unit 1 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Unit 1 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Unit 1 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Unit 2 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Unit 2 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Unit 2 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Unit 3 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Unit 3 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Unit 3 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Unit 3 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

Unit 3 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Unit 3 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Unit 3

Page 62test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Subbitum inous 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Subbitum inous-Coke

Page 63test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

86 86 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 14 14 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

86 86 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 14 14 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

92 92 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 8 8 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

85 85 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 15 15 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

92 92 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 8 8 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

86 86 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 14 14 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Subbitum inous-Coke

coal - subbituminous

83 83 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Subbitum inous-Coke

petroleum coke 17 17

Page 64cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 65cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 66test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 No No 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 No No 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 No No 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 No No 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 No No 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 No No 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Stack-3 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 No No 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 No No 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 No No 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 No No 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 No No

Page 67test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 68sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 1.02 10.5 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 average 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 1.25 8.5 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 average 7/16/2008 7/16/2008 29.8 27.6 10.9 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 1.26 10.7 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 average 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 1.05 8.3 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 average 7/17/2008 7/17/2008 30.4 28.1 9.2 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Stack-3 average 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 1.27 9.4 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 1.28 10.3 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average 9/27/2006 9/27/2006 1.29 9.2 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average 7/26/2007 7/26/2007 1.31 10.7 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average 9/27/2006 9/27/2006 1.32 9.9 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 average 5/18/2006 5/18/2006 1.33 9.4 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 average 7/15/2008 7/15/2008 78.6 72.8 7.8

Page 69sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 105791 dscfm 68 1 7.3 11.7 1.03 105791 dscfm 68 1 7.3 11.7 1.01 100066 dscfm 68 1 7 13 1.04 109579 dscfm 68 1 6.7 12.3 1.07 109579 dscfm 68 1 6.7 12.3 1.06 107534 dscfm 68 1 8 13 1.09 199361 dscfm 68 1 5.4 14.1 275 196773 dscfm 68 1 6.8 13 280 223890 dscfm 68 1 6 13 290 184151 dscfm 68 1 7 14 279 193391 dscfm 68 1 6 13 299 196773 dscfm 68 1 5.4 14.2 275 218936 dscfm 68 1 7.3 12.7 269

Page 70sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.96 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 1.02 6.08 11885 0.96 201A/202 Subbitum inous 1.25 6.08 11885 0.98 OTM027/201A/202 Subbitum inous 29.8 6.55 12057 0.95 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 1.26 5.83 11979 0.95 201A/202 Subbitum inous 1.05 5.83 11979 0.98 OTM027/201A/202 Subbitum inous 30.4 6.98 12034 0.95 10 0.95 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous-Coke 1.28 7.69 12299 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous-Coke 1.29 8.41 12259 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous-Coke 1.31 6.42 12623 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous-Coke 1.32 8.41 12259 0.95 201A/202 Subbitum inous-Coke 1.33 7.69 12299 0.98 OTM027/201A/202 Subbitum inous-Coke 78.6 7.43 12534

Page 71sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.38 0.38 0.4 0.39 0.39 0.5 0.89 0.89 1.73 0.89 0.89 1.24

Page 72sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0093 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0065 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0077 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.000356 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.000296 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 5.81E-05 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 1.39E-06 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0114 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0089 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0093 FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20080716

Stack-1 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.004 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0064 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0168 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.004 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.000395 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.000355 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 3.06E-05 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 8.74E-06 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 average PM (Filterable) 0.0079 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 average PM (Condensable) 0.0072 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.006 FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20080717

Stack-2 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0029 FALSE 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 average PM (Filterable) 0.0112 FALSE 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 average PM (Condensable) 0.059 FALSE 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0036 FALSE 1077 SUTH3-CO-20060518

Stack-3 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 2293.8 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.000136 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.000109 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 9.11E-06 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.000018 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 1.19 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 1.03 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.05 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.11 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.36 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.51 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.05 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 6.8 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 1.205 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.289 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.027 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.889 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 average PM (Filterable) 0.0138 FALSE 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 average PM (Condensable) 0.0151 FALSE 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.006 FALSE 1077 Suth3-PM-20080715

Stack-3 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.003 FALSE

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 8.478 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0203 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0093 grains/dscf) 5.884 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0142 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0065 grains/dscf) 6.981 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0168 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0077 grains/dscf) 0.00118 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.83E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00098 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.34E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000193 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 4.6E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.55E-06 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.11E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 9.703 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0238 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0114 grains/dscf) 7.668 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0188 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0089 grains/dscf) 7.922 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0194 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0093 grains/dscf) 3.468 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0085 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.004 grains/dscf) 5.978 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0134 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0064 grains/dscf) 15.904 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0347 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0168 grains/dscf) 3.761 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0084 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.004 grains/dscf) 0.00135 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.98E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00122 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.73E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000105 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.31E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 3.01E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 6.6E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 7.279 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0178 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0079 grains/dscf) 6.531 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0162 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0072 grains/dscf) 5.602 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0137 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.006 grains/dscf) 2.639 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0065 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0029 grains/dscf) 18.891 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0214 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0112 grains/dscf) 99.386 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.1123 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.059 grains/dscf) 6.057 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0068 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0036 grains/dscf) 1993.2 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.242 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000836 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.04E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000669 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 8.54E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000056 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 6.91E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000111 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.38E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.001 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.03E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00086 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.16E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00004 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.24E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00009 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 9.61E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00533 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.39E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000365 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 4.06E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 3.91E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 4.68E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00492 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.9E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000831 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.13E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000199 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.71E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.86E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.53E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000613 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 8.32E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 25.898 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0298 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0138 grains/dscf) 28.315 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0325 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0151 grains/dscf) 11.238 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.013 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.006 grains/dscf) 5.697 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0066 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.003 grains/dscf)

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0093 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0065 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0077 grains/dscf)

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0114 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0089 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0093 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.004 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0064 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0168 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.004 grains/dscf)

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0079 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0072 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.006 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0029 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0112 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.059 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0036 grains/dscf)

Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0138 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0151 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.006 grains/dscf) Typical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.003 grains/dscf)

Page 75sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1077 SUTH1-Hg-20060516

Stack-1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH1-PM-20060516

Stack-1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-Hg-20060517

Stack-2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH2-PM-20060517

Stack-2 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060518

Stack-3 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20060927

Stack-3 average Mercury (Hg) 0.08 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Hg-20070726

Stack-3 average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-Inlet-Hg-20060927

ESP Inlet-3 average Mercury (Hg) 0.08 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1077 SUTH3-PM-20060518

Stack-3 average Mercury (Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 76sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 77