alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Energy & Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jimmy Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 15, 2010
By:
/s/ JIMMY WANGJimmy WangChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
#### Willard D. GROSS, appellant, v. Jean P. GROSS, appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 4, 1954.

See, also, 260 S.W.2d 655.

Elmer Drake, Lexington, for appellant.

Weldon Shouse, Lexington, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motions for an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court awarding appellee’s counsel a fee of $300 for services rendered, and expenses incurred, in representing appellee on an appeal in this Court.

Upon a review of the case, we conclude the allowance of this fee was within the sound discretion of the Chancellor, and that the record supports his finding.

The motions for an appeal and cross-appeal are overruled and the judgment is affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal.
Exhibit 21.1

ZUMIEZ INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                            |  |                                    
|--------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary          |  | Place of Incorporation or Formation
|Zumiez Nevada, LLC          |  | Nevada                             
|                            | 
|ZIC, LLC                    |  | Washington                         
|                            | 
|ZIC II, LLC                 |  | Washington                         
|                            | 
|Zumiez International, LLC   |  | Washington                         
|                            | 
|Zumiez Canada Holdings Inc. |  | British Columbia
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended March 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Service Air                Group,                Inc. |

| By:    | */s/*   *Mohammad                Sultan*Mohammad                Sultan Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:     May                14, 2007 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                                        
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|August 8, 2006 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|Date           |  | David H. Fleischman                    
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer,               
|               |  | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 28     | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 9      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
**KPMG
      LLP**


**Suite
      2000**


**355
      South Grand Avenue**


**Los
      Angeles, CA 90071-1568**






**Independent
      Accountants' Report**




The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholder


Option
      One Mortgage Corporation:




We
      have
      examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
      assertion, that Option
      One Mortgage Corporation complied with the minimum servicing standards set
      forth
      in the Mortgage
      Bankers Association of America's *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* as of
      and
      for the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for Option
      One
      Mortgage Corporation's
      compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
      express an opinion
      on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
      examination.




Our
      examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
      by the American Institute
      of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including examining, on a
      test
      basis, evidence about
      Option One Mortgage Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards specified above
      and
      performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
      circumstances. We believe that
      our
      examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
      not provide a legal determination
      on Option One Mortgage Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that Option One Mortgage Corporation complied
      with the aforementioned
      minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
      is
      fairly stated
      in
      all material respects.




/s/KPMG
      LLP




Los
      Angeles, California


February
      28, 2006








KPMG
      LLP,
      a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.


member
      firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40102 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ABRAHAM ORTEGA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 1587

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abraham Ortega raises argument s that are foreclosed by United States v. Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d 198,
204

- 05 (5th Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14

- 10355) , in
which this court held that an enhanc ement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction that is a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the prior conviction required proof of remuneration or

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has det ermined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40102 Document: 00513242575 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 15

- 40102

2 commercial activity, and United States v. Rodriguez

- Escareno , 7 00 F.3d 751,
753

- 54 (5th Cir. 2012) , in which this court held that a federal conviction for conspiracy to commit a drug trafficking offense qualifies for the § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) enhancement

. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-40102 Document: 00513242575 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ PAUL H. SUNU
---------------------------------------------

Name:    Paul H. Sunu
Title:   Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
          and Secretary
Date:    May 13, 2004




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with the Annual Report of Madison  Explorations,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin M. Stunder, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: March 9, 2007



                                        By: /s/ KEVIN M. STUNDER
                                            _____________________________
                                                Kevin M. Stunder
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2156 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2156

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P17.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2011

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P17.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map included in the set of maps entitled 
``Coastal Barrier Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit 
P17 in Florida is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same 
unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
Corrected Unit P17'' and dated ____.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
#### HARPER v. STATE.

No. 23153.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1945.

Hawkins & Myers, of Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of forgery and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary.

Jesse Jones and wife, Margaret, owned a house situated on Lot 5, Block 2, Booker Washington Addition to the City of Houston. They entered into an agreement with appellant for certain repairs at a specified sum for labor with a separate item for material. A form of contract, setting out its terms, was presented to Jones but no instrument in writing was signed by them. The work was begun and a few days thereafter appellant applied to one Edwards, a barber of his race and color, for a loan representing that he had a contract to repair the Jones home and desired money for the purpose of paying his laborers as the work progressed. The contract money was to be paid upon completion. Edwards advanced him some money but required that he go to his lawyer, Davis, and satisfy him as to the legality of his contract and the validity of the loan. Among other things, Davis prepared a mechanic’s lien to be executed by Jones and wife in conformity with law, and gave it to appellant instructing him about having it executed. The evidence is without dispute that appellant forged the names of Jones and wife to this instrument, and secured a notary who affixed his jurat without requiring their presence. The instrument was returned to Davis in whose presence Edwards paid to appellant $170, or more, for the purpose of taking care of his laborers,. It transpired that Jones and wife had furnished money for this purpose and that the job was not completed in accordance with appellant’s contract. If Jones and wife had executed the instrument alleged in the indictment, they would have become obligated to appellant in a pecuniary way and Edwards, as his as-signee, might have been able to collect his money from them independent of the validity of the lien against their home.

The chief defense urged on appeal is based upon the proposition that the instrument, if it had been signed by Jones and wife and acknowledged in the manner indicated, would not “have created, increased, diminished, discharged or defeated any pecuniary obligation, or would have transferred, or in any manner have affected any property whatever” as provided in Article 979, Vernon’s Ann. P.C. The foregoing statement of the case sufficiently answers this proposition.

Appellant has filed his brief in this case but has cited no authorities to sustain his position. We are not familiar with any which would assist him.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 13     | 0      | 0      | 26     | 4      | 4      | 6      | 3      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### ACKER v. STATE

No. 26742.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense or unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The punishment is assessed at a fine of $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.