alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -9    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25     | -1     | 23     | -44    | 51     | 86     | 11     | 161    | 30     | -6    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -29    | -157   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *196Roberto Hernandez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), rendered on July 13, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years for each count, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 68    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 66     | 68     | 70     | 71     | 69     | 62     | 56     | 51     | 50     | 45    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37     | 34     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 28     | 15     | 25     | 7     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 49     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2014______-NM-___015_______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2104; MM Docket No. 00-109; RM-9899]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ravenwood, MO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 291A to Ravenwood, Missouri, in 
response to a petition filed by Clyde John Holdsworth and Ronald G. 
Fillbeck d/b/a R.C. Broadcasting Company. See 65 FR 41036, July 3, 
2000. The coordinates for Channel 291A at Ravenwood are 40-21-09 NL and 
94-40-16 WL. A filing window for Channel 291A at Ravenwood will not be 
opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for 
this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective October 30, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 00-109, adopted September 6, 2000, and 
released September 15, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Florida, is 
amended by adding Ravenwood, Channel 291A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-24647 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 58094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Review and Analysis of Tobacco Industry Documents.
    Date: October 13, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
Conference Room C, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Mary Jane Slesinski, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8045, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301/594-1566.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-24727 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, William D. Markert, Chief Financial Officer of Securus Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/WILLIAM D. MARKERT       |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | William D. Markert          |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*** |
|   | March 30, 2009              |
#### Pearl SIMPSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 11, 1955.

J. K. Beasley, Harlan, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman,' Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted and tried for having seven quarts and two cans of beer in his possession for sale in territory which had. been declared .legally dry as a result of a local option election. He was convicted and sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined$50. It is urged upon this appeal that the Commonwealth failed to prove that the. territory was dry at the time of the offense charged, and that the trial court should have affirmatively instructed the jury to the effect that the appellant claimed that he had the beer for his own use.

The officers found the beer under a trap door in a closet in back of appellant’s store and filling station, and found also a number of empty beer cases. Evidence was adduced that the appellant had a bad reputation for trafficking in intoxicating liquors. The only evidence offered as to the territory being dry was that of Officer Kelly of the State Police who testified that appellant’s place *is*in local option territory. The appellant complains that this evidence does not establish that appellant’s place of business was in dry territory at the time of the offense, but only at the time witness Kelly appeared before the grand jury or at the time of the trial itself. While it must be established that the territory was dry at the time of the offense charged, yre think that the evidence adduced here was sufficient for that purpose because it was the only reason for admitting it — that is, to show that it was dry territory at the time of the offense. If it had not been dry territory at the time of the offense, the appellant certainly would have called the court’s attention to that fact.

The trial court gave the usual reasonable doubt instruction, and we believe it was adequáte on the facts of this case to present to the jury appellant’s defense that he had the beer for his own consumption. If the jury had any reasonable doubt as to whether the appellant had the beer on his premises for the purpose of sale, it- necessarily would have 'had'to conclude, on the *468basis of the testimony, that appellant had the beer for his own consumption. We think the instruction was couched in such language that it completely and adequately presented the defense of the accused and required no affirmative instruction embodying his theory. In other words, the jury was not misled. See Reynolds v. Com., Ky., 257 S.W.2d 514; Blevins v. Com., Ky., 258 S.W.2d 501; Hancock v. Com., Ky., 262 S.W.2d 670.

Judgment is affirmed.

HOGG, J., not sitting.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice Cotton, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s principal contention is that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial. Defendant’s waiver was valid. He signed a written waiver in open court after consulting with counsel and was fully informed by the court of the nature and consequences of the waiver *(see, People v Mettler,*147 AD2d 849, *lv denied*74 NY2d 666; *People v Aponte,*144 AD2d 679, 680, *lv denied 73*NY2d *888; cf., People v Burnett,*136 AD2d 888, *lv denied*70 NY2d 1004). On this record, defendant’s conviction of first degree robbery is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The record also establishes that defendant received meaningful assistance of counsel *(see, People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147). We have considered the issues raised in defendant’s supplemental *pro se*brief and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. AND C.F.O. PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Lions Gate Investment Limited for the quarter ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, hereby certifies that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Gate Investment Limited;



2.

based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

the registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



---





(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.













March
17, 2003

Date

N. Desmond Smith

C.E.O., C.F.O. and Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2019

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2019

157257

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157257

COA: 334145

Tuscola CC: 13-012673-FH

DAVID HENRY JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 3, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Ames (Docket No. 156077). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in 

Ames on June 26, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it 

is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.