alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

COREY J. STRZYZEWSKI, Appellant, vs. GABRIEL BYRNES, OFFENDER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR; DR. ROBERT BANNISTER; SHANNON MOYLE; RON SCHRECKENGOST; AND LISA WALSH, Resoondents. No. 64318 

# FILED
MAY 2 7 2014
TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERUF SUPREME COURT BY Ste__ DEPUTY CLER ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissing a civil rights complaint. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. Notice of entry of the August 22, 2013, district court order challenged in this appeal was served on appellant by United States mail on August 29, 2013. Because service of the notice of entry was by mail, appellant had 33 days from the date of service to file his notice of appeal in the district court. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). Appellant's notice of appeal was therefore due to be filed in that court on or before October 1, 2013. Appellant, however, did not file his notice of appeal in the district court until October 28, 2013, beyond the 33-day period for filing that document. Since appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Healy v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 (1987) (noting that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. And in light of

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ea 1 

### 9 -110our dismissal of this appeal, we deny as moot all motions and other

requests for relief currently pending in this appeal. Thus, the clerk of this court is directed to return, unfiled, the civil proper person appeal statement that was provisionally received in this court on February 12, 2014. It is so ORDERED.



# Pideutur Pickering 

# coo Parraguirre ,

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Corey J. Strzyzewski Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 J.

(0) 1947A ce
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4655 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAIL CLIPPERS AND NAIL FILES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Nail clippers and nail files 

(provided for in subheading 8214.20.30) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4655 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Opportunity for Public Comment

New Stakeholder Engagement on APHIS Biotechnology Regulation

You are invited by the United Sates Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Biotechnology Regulatory Services (BRS) to participate in 

stakeholder engagement regarding APHIS’s regulation of the products of biotechnology. 

In a stakeholder message sent on February 27, 2015, and a Federal Register notice published on 

March 4, 2015, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced the 

withdrawal of its 2008 proposed rule that would have amended the regulations for certain 

genetically engineered (GE) organisms, and plans for stakeholder engagement regarding 

biotechnology regulation. 

USDA APHIS created a website to serve as a resource on upcoming engagement initiatives. 

Stakeholders can visit http://www.aphis.usda.gov/APHISVirtualMeetings/, and find background 

information, associated documents, and details on how to provide input on the future of 

biotechnology regulation.

This engagement begins with this opportunity to provide written comments on the questions 

listed below through June 22, 2015. Additionally, those who want to provide verbal comments

may participate in a series of webinars scheduled in May.

APHIS seeks input on the following questions:

1. Should APHIS regulate based on the characteristics of biotechnology products and the 

potential risks they may pose, or by the process by which they were created? In either 

case, what criteria should be used to determine what APHIS regulates? Are there 

products and processes APHIS should not regulate?

2. The Plant Protection Act gives APHIS the authority to protect plant health through 

regulatory programs. APHIS has implemented the plant pest authority as part of their 

biotechnology regulations. Should APHIS add noxious weed provisions to their 

biotechnology regulations and if so, how? What protection goals should APHIS 

consider?

3. Are there legal authorities given to USDA outside the Plant Protection Act that APHIS 

should examine to regulate or oversee the products of biotechnology? What are they, and 

how would they be used?
4. What non-regulatory solutions or policy alternatives could or should be considered to 

complement APHIS’s regulatory program?

Webinars for verbal comments will be held: 

Wednesday, May 6, 6-9 pm EDT

Tuesday, May 12, 5-8 pm EDT

Wednesday, May 20, 4-7 pm EDT

The webinars will be the same; they will vary only by date and time. We encourage those 

wishing to attend and/or comment at the webinars to register in advance at 

https://www.regonline.com/builder/site/Default.aspx?EventID=1696465. These webinars will be 

recorded, transcribed, and posted to the Web. More information regarding the webinars is 

available at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/APHISVirtualMeetings/. 

Please note that webinar commenters will be limited by time; those seeking to provide additional 

comments or supplementary material are encouraged to do so here on the eRulemaking Portal.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4633 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4633

        To extend the suspension of duty on Chloromethylbenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Altmire introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the suspension of duty on Chloromethylbenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.18 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Chloromethylbenzene) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### LAWRENCE v. STATE.

No. 23951.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1948.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1948.

*160■ Cox & Cox, of Sherman, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the Stafe.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the possession of liquor for the purpose of sale with a fine of $400.

The State’s Attorney has filed the following brief in this cause:

> “Appellant was charged by complaint and information in the County Court of Gray-son County, Texas, with the offense of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area. The State established by its evidence that certain officers, armed with a search warrant, searched appellant’s premises on the 14th day of March, 1947, and recovered fourteen pints of assorted whis-ky.

> “The appellant offered no evidence. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and assessed appellant’s punishment at a fine of $400.

> “By proper allegation in the complaint and information, the State pled that Grayson .County was a dry area, but we find no evidence in the record proving or tending to prove that said county was a dry area. We submit that it was incumbent upon the State to not only allege but to prove, if it could, that Grayson County was a dry area. See Trapp v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 167 S.W.2d 525; Brown v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 3, 117 S.W.2d 107; Sweeten v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 445, 120 S.W.2d 1074; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 126 S.W.2d 981.

> “The State therefore respectfully submits that said cause should be reversed and remanded.”

The suggestion is justified by the record. It was incumbent upon the State to make out its case, which it did not do.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The State has filed a motion for a rehearing which is accompanied by a supplemental statement of facts supplying the omissions from the one originally filed, which omissions therein resulted in a reversal of the judgment of conviction.

 It has been the consistent holding of this Court that a statement of facts could not be amended or supplemented by either party after the record has. reached the appellate court. The original statement of facts was examined by the county attorney as well as by'the attorney for appellant and was- agreed to by both parties which was approved by the trial court as a true and complete statement of the facts proven on the trial. We do not doubt the correctness of the State’s contention that it was stipulated at the beginning of the trial that Gray-son County was a dry area, however, we are not- authorized to consider the supplemental statement of facts. See Weeks v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 113 S.W.2d 532; and McConnell v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 409, 212 S.W. 498.

The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.-

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Russell E. Pommer 

Associate General Counsel and Senior 

Director, Regulatory Affairs 

801 1 ih St. NW, Ste. 410 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Issue date: October 7, 2014 

Authority expires: December 2, 2014 

v..or, Office oflntemational Aviation 

NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on 

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable 

Department regulations and the provisions ofthe 2014-2015 U.S.-China Protocol. 

Number of Flights: six (6) one-way charters' 

Flight Date(s): November 2, 7, 14, 21 , 28 & 30,2014 

Points: Shanghai (PVG) - Anchorage (ANC*) - Chicago (ORD) 

Equipment: Boeing 747F 

The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Division (X-44), Office oflntemationa1 Aviation, Department ofTransportation, on its operation for the 

preceding month by the tenth of each month whether the flights operated. 

This notice is valid only for the flight contained in the above program. 

* Denotes technical stop only. 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

www.regulations.gov 

1 Following our grant of Atlas Air Inc.'s request for four (4) one-way charter allocation, 52 one-way charter allocations remain 

available in the Zone I charter pool for the 20 14/ 15 charter year.
#### DARDEN v. STATE.

No. 24409.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1949.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of selling whisky in a dry area, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

The record, as brought forward, contains neither bills of exceptions nor a statement of facts. The proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4711 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather basketballs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. GUTHRIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather 

basketballs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEATHER BASKETBALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.08 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 leather basketballs) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4711 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Siliconix incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, King Owyang, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ King Owyang                       | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|                                      | 
|King Owyang                           | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|May 10, 2004                          | 
|                                      | 

18

---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: September 20, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-24535 Filed 9-20-00; 10:55 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573. 

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

LRI Express, Inc., 343 N. Wood Dale Road, Suite 201, Wood Dale, IL 60191; Officers: Frederick G. Frantz, Jr., President, Paul S. Jarzombek, Secretary (Qualifying Individual) 

Autico International L.L.C., 1139 East Jersey Street, Suite 513, Elizabeth, NJ 07201; Officer: Jochen Auffhammer, Member, Bernard A. Russell, Vice President (Qualifying Individual) 

Global Network Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a Global Network, 1237 NW 93 Court, Miami, FL 33178; Officers: Miguel Camacho, President, Marianella Camacho, Vice President (Qualifying Individual) 

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicants: 

South Beach Maritime Company, 8626 NW 55 Place, Coral Springs, FL 33067; Officer: Pierre Larenas, President (Qualifying Individual) 

Protrans International, Inc., 117 West Main Street, Plainfield, IN 46168; Officers: Craig G. Roeder, President, Marino J. Diaz, Director of Sales (Qualifying Individual) 

Seaspace International Forwarders USA Inc., 328 Littlefield Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080; Officers: Mike Smith, President, Kevin Beehn, Vice President (Qualifying Individual) 

Dated: September 22, 2000.

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-24810 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Cyrus BAILEY, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27131.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 5 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for Our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 855   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 823    | 919    | 932    | 955    | 1,137  | 877    | 944    | 1,119  | 1,219  | 1,151 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 795    | 1,083  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023