alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT LAMBERT F. AGAMA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-4482 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 30, 2015.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; John F. Lakin, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, A ssistant Attorney General, Tampa, for A ppellee.

ALTENBERND, Judge. Lambert F. Agama appeals his judgments and sentences for trave ling to seduce, solicit, or entice a child to commit a sex act in viola tion of section 847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), and using a computer t o seduce, solicit, or

entice a child to commit a sex act in violation of section 847. 0135(3)(a). Mr. Agama correctly argues that a conviction and sentence for both offens es violates the prohibition- 2 - against double jeopardy. See Meythaler v. State, 175 So. 3d 91 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015). Accordi ngly, we reverse the conviction and sentence for soliciting. Although we affirm Mr. Agama's conviction for traveling, the reversal of the c onviction for soliciting substa ntially reduces the total points on the sentencing scoresheet. We thus remand for the tr ial court to vacate Mr. Agama's sentence for traveling and to resentence Mr. Agama on t hat conviction. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 25170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8715]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of the Harakat ul-
Jihad-i-Islami/Bangladesh (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as amended.

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 18, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-10119 Filed 5-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WARREN MOSLER and MOSLER AUTO CARE CENTER, INC., a Florida 

corporation, d/b/a MOSLER AUTOMOTIVE,

Appellants,

v.

JAMES TODD WAGNER and SUPERCAR ENGINEERING, INC., a 

Florida corporation,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-2279

[May 5, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Donald W. Hafele, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502012CA023358XXXXMB.

Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Rebecca Mercier Vargas and Stephanie L. Serafin 

of Kreusler-Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellants.

Scott W. Zappolo and Jeffrey G. Farwell of Zappolo & Farwell, P.A., Palm 

Beach Gardens, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4558 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4558

 To extend and modify the temporarily suspension of duty on Bifenthrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend and modify the temporarily suspension of duty on Bifenthrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIFENTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bifenthrin) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.7%'' and inserting ``1.2%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### GILMORE v. STATE.

No. 24678.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1950.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1950.

*168None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and was assessed a fine of $200.00.

There are no bills of exception nor statement of facts found in the record. The pleadings appear to be regular, and we have nothing further to review.

The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, P. J., absent
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C.      SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/William              D.              Edwards, Jr. |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William                D.                Edwards, Jr.      |   |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer                     |   |
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION135)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eschelon Telecom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Geoffrey M. Boyd, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1)          The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
| Sign:                         | /S/ | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|-------------------------------|-----|------------------|--------|
| Geoffrey M. Boyd              |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| June    , 2004 |

 

----
#### ELLIS v. STATE.

No. 24304.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1949.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1949.

C. C. McKinney, of Cooper, for appellant.

Royce Whitten, Co. Atty.,. of Paris, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an assault with intent to murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of three years.

The transcript in this case contains fourteen bills of exceptions and several objections to the court’s charge. The statement of facts accompanying the transcript is in question and answer form, therefore, the same cannot be considered by us. In the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot properly appraise the bills of exceptions nor the objections to the court’s charge. See Turman v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 60 S.W.2d 231; Ackerman v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 125, 61 S.W.2d 116; and Lee v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 196, 61 S.W.2d 832.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MELORA DOUGLAS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-757

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

LAKE FLORENCE HOME OWNERS

ASSOCIATION AND MERS,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 9, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge.

Melora Douglas, Orlando, pro se.

Kimberly Hopkins, of Shapiro, Fishman & 

Gache, LLP, Tampa, for Appellee U.S. 

Bank.

No appearance for other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, J.J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57825-57826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Petroglyph National Monument; Transfer of Administrative 
Jurisdiction Over Certain Lands

DATES: The effective date of this Order shall be the date of 
publication in the Federal Register.

SUMMARY: The Petroglyph National Monument Establishment Act of 1990, 
Pub. L. No. 101-313, 104 Stat. 272, established Petroglyph National 
Monument on the outskirts of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Within the 
monument's authorized boundaries

[[Page 57826]]

were certain lands owned by the State of New Mexico. On March 31, 2000, 
the Bureau of Land Management acquired those particular lands, in the 
name of the United States, in a land exchange with the State Land 
Office. On August 14, 2000, the Bureau of Land Management advised that 
it was transferring administrative jurisdiction on the said lands to 
the National Park Service.
    The lands and/or interests acquired by the Bureau of Land 
Management, subject to this notice, are designated as Tract 101-05, 
within the boundaries of Petroglyph National Monument, consisting of 
641.89 acres, more or less.
    Notice is hereby given that, as of the date of publication of this 
notice, administrative jurisdiction over those lands and/or interests 
in land is formally transferred from the Bureau of Land Management to 
the National Park Service.
    Maps and legal descriptions of these particular lands are available 
for inspection at Petroglyph National Monument Headquarters and the 
National Park Service, Land Resources Program Center, 2968 Rodeo Park 
Drive West, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505.

    Dated: August 31, 2000.
Karen Wade,
Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 00-24696 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 106 (Tuesday, June 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31938-31939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12785]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2014-6004]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals Submissions, 
and Approvals

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-79 Broker Registration Form.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part

[[Page 31939]]

of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically. This form is used by insurance brokers to register with 
Export-Import Bank. It provides Export-Import Bank staff with the 
information necessary to make a determination of the eligibility of the 
broker to receive commission payments under Export-Import Bank's credit 
insurance programs.
    Form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-79.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 3, 2014, to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038, Attn: OMB 3048-
0024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-27 Broker Registration Form.
    OMB Number: 3048-0024.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by insurance brokers to register 
with Export Import Bank. The form provides Export Import Bank staff 
with the information necessary to make a determination of the 
eligibility of the broker to receive commission payments under Export 
Import Bank's credit insurance programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities engaged in brokering 
export credit insurance policies.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 50.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Review Time per Response: 2 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once every three years.
    Government Reviewing Time per Year: 100 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $4,250.
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $5,100.

Bonita Jones,
Program Analyst, Records Management Divison.
[FR Doc. 2014-12785 Filed 6-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0335 -----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:32PM ----- To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>
Date: 02/12/2010 06:31PM cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Clarifying questions on RICE Hi Melanie,

A ttached you'll find a spreadsheet of the costs and benefits for area source engines between 300 and 500 HP. The attached analysis shows that requiring controls for these engines, if they run less than ~100 hrs per year, is not cost-beneficial (costs of controls exceed the PM2.5 benefits). Do you know how many engines in this group run less than 100 hours per year and are not emergency engines?

A dditionally, for these sized engines running 100 hours, the estimate of reporting costs is 1/3 of the total annual costs. Given that these engines will have control devices installed, and emissions reductions will be achieved, is there any flexibility to ease the reporting requirements? Furthermore, is there any flexibility in lessening in the reporting requirements for the area source engines subject to emissions limits (and thus technology controls)?

Thanks, Cortney

Page 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 26, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00357

- CR

Marcus IDROGO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 07

- 159

- CRW Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The court reporter’s second notice of late record is noted. We order the court reporter, Leticia Escamilla, to file the reporter’s record in this appeal by September 23, 2019. The court reporter is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely requ est that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, and (2) provides the court reasonable assurance that the record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy wo rk schedule to be an extraordinary

circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-04-1997
<CASH>                              521,237 
<SECURITIES>                      1,709,355
<RECEIVABLES>                       765,195
<ALLOWANCES>                        231,907
<INVENTORY>                       1,952,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,445,427
<PP&E>                            7,133,677
<DEPRECIATION>                    6,611,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,608,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,436,143
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                          2,995,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,608,513
<SALES>                           8,166,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  8,166,933
<CGS>                             3,558,884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,558,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     553,830
<INCOME-TAX>                          3,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 549,952
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        549,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .20

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4655 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4655

           To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

 Mr. Butterfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on nail clippers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAIL CLIPPERS AND NAIL FILES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Nail clippers and   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          nail files                                                        12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8214.20.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4686 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4686

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2012

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-Chlorobenzaldehyde) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```