;1. 

r~ 

[ 

r 

r~ 

[ 

0 

D 

[ 

1-. 

I 

U 

0 

l. 

L 

l 

L 

• 

EMISSIONS TEST REPORT 

HUNTINGTON PLATING, INC. 

CHROME SCRUBBER STACK 

HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA 

DECEMBER 2005 

TI-1162 

~~+ ~ TEST, INCORPORATED 

Technical Environmental Services Team 

Route 2, Box 33-B, Poca, West Virginia 25159 Ph: (304) 755-1077 Fx: (304) 755-1099 
[ 

[ 

r 

[ 

[ 

[ 

o 

o 

L 

[" 

I 

L 

o 

L 

1-

l. 

l 

l 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Introduction 

Summary of Results 

Discussion of Results 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

Sampling Location 

Appendixes 

A - Computer Data 

B - Analytical Data 

C - Field Data Sheets 

D - Calibration Data 

E - Chain of Custody 

F - Protocol 

List of Tables and Graphs 

Table 1 Summary of Results 

Graph 1 Summary of Results 

Table 2 Chrome Sampling Data 

1 

1 

4 

5 

6 

7 

2 

2 

3 

.. 
r 

r 

[ 

r 

[ 

[ 

m 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

[j 

o 

L 

l 

L 

I 

INTRODUCTION 

Emissions Test Report 

Huntington Plating, Inc. 

Chrome Scrubber Stack 

Huntington, West Virginia 

TI-1162 

Emission testing was conducted at Huntington Plating, Inc., located in Huntington, West 

Virginia, on October 6,2005, by TEST, Incorporated, Charleston, West Virginia, under the 

direction of Mike Blake. The purpose of these tests was to detennine the concentration of total 

chrome being emitted into the atmosphere via the Chrome Scrubber Stack. Tom Houvouras of 

Huntington Plating, Inc. coordinated the testing with plant operations. 

The testing followed the procedures in the Appendix to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 

40, Chapter 1, Part 60, Methods 1,2, 3A, 4, and 306. 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

The following tables and graph provide results for the emission rates measured on the Chrome 

Scrubber Stack. The emission results are presented in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter 

(mgldscm) and pounds per hour (1bs/hr). 

1 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

Chrome Scrubber Stack 

T~'ble 1 Graph 1 

Total Chrome 6.00E-04 

Run Emissions 

Number Cgr/dsct} (lbs!lu) 

1:' 

1 < 0.0059 <2.97B-04 ~ 5.00E-04 

e 

g 

·2. < 0.0057 <2.8$04 J 4.00£-04 

I» 

1 < 0.0059 <2.28J!-04· ~ 

. . .... a 

:. Average < O;OOSs. <2.93&04' ! 3.00E-04 

~ 

2.00E-04 

1 2 3 Average 

Run Number .. 
r 

r 

I. 

r 

r 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

I. 

I 

U 

o 

L 

l 

I 

I 

l 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

Ruu 

Date 

Dioxide Cone. - % Vol. 

. ,r , 1 - %Va l. 

I Stack ,- ' 

Area of Stack - Sq. in. 

,Dry Gas I - dscf 

Volume Dry Gas - dscm 

IStack , -Deg. F 

, - % 

~ 

-

; Flow Rate -

;np. Rate - % 

TOtal ,r, ,;, , - l'g 

~ 

§!! 

Table 2 

Total Chrome Sampling Data 

Chrome Scrubber Stack 

I 

10-6-05 

2 

10-6-05 

900-1110 1 ill!.. - 1355 

0.11 0.11 

19.10 19.10 

29.57 2957 

804.20 804.20 

...22:.384 93~ 

2.559 2.650 

121. 10 124.50 

2.59 2.60 

~ 

~ 

'j: , ~ . , 

n,n n d(,Q , 

..21.2 94.9 

< 15.0 < 15.0 

~ < 0.0059 < 0.0057 

' n . I+-

3 

3 

10-6-05 

1425 - 1630 

0. 11 

19.10 

29.5§ 

804.20 

89. 

2540 

122.90 

1.75 

r 

+-

nd,Q 

91.0 

< 15.0 

~ 

. ~ , 
r" 

I 

r 

I 

I 

[ 

o 

D 

[ 

I: 

I 

L 

o 

I 

l 

I 

• 

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 

Three tests for total chrome were performed on the Chrome Scrubber St;:lck. The results of the tests 

appear to be an accurate and valid representation of the actual emissions of the slack. Leak checks 

were performed on the sampling systems to maintain the integrity of the samples and no leaks were 

detected. The moisture percentages were consistent with the largest variation being 24.24 percent 

from the mean value of 2.31 percent. The flow rates were consistent with the largest variation 

being 0.32 percent from the mean value of 13452.67 DSCFM. The isokinetic sampling rates were 

within the specified limits (90 to 110 % isokinetic) with the largest variation being 9.0 percent from 

100 pen:ent. 

The laboratory analytical results were non-detect for the three runs. Based on a minimum detectible 

limit of 15 micrograms per liter, the average concentration of total chrome was less than 0.0058 

milligrams per dry standard cubic meter. The maximum variation during the three tests was equal 

to 1.72 percent. 

4 
[ 

I. 

r 

r 

[ 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

[j 

o 

I 

I 

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

The testing followed the procedures in the Appendix to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, 

Chapter I, Pan 60, Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 306. 

Twelve traverse points were sampled from each of the two ports on the Chrome Scrubber Stack for 

a (a lai of twenty-four traverse po ints. The manometer was zeroed and leak checks were perfonned 

before each test. Leak checks were pclfonned on the sampling systems to maintain the integrity of 

the samples and no leaks were detected. 

Total Chrome 

Three samples for total chrome were collected. The samples were laken according to EPA Method 

306. For each run, samples of fivc-minute duration were taken isokincticall y from each of the 

twenty-four traverse points for a total sampling time of 120 minutes. Blank samples were collected 

for each reagent used during sampling and analyzed for contamination. 

The "front-half' of the sampling train consisted of a glass nozzle and a heated stainless glass probe. 

The "back-half' of the sampling train contained the following impingers: 

Impinger 

2 

3 

4 

Contents 

0.1 N NaOH 

0. 1 N NaOH 

Empty 

Silica Gel 

Amount 

100 ml. 

100 ml 

400 g 

Parameter 

Total Chrome 

Total Chrome 

Moisture 

Moisture 

Total chrome samples were analyzed by graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA) according to 

EPA Method 306, by TEST, Inc., Poca, West Virginia. 

5 
Chrome Scrubber 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• • • • • • • • • • • • 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Traverse Percent of Inches From 

Points Diameter Stack Wall 

I 21 I 

2 6.7 2 2116 

3 J!.8 3 12/16 

4 17.7 5 11116 

5 25.0 8 

te ft. 32 ill'. 6 35.5 II 6/16 

Port to Upstream Distance = 9 ft. 6.0 m. 7 64.5 2010/16 

Port to Downstream Distance = 6 ft. 6.0 m. 8 75.0 24 

Aren Of Stack = 804.2 sq. inches 9 82.3 26 5116 

Port to Upstream Distance = 3.56 Stack Diameters 10 88.2 28 4116 

Port to Downstream Distance = 2.44 Stack Diameters I J 93.3 2914116 

Drawin s Not to Scale 12 97.9 31 
I[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

C g

.' ·1 

., 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

o 

n 

I] 

[ 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

• 

APPENDIXES 

A - Computer Data 

B - Analytical Data 

C - Field Data Sheets 

D - Calibration Data 

E - Chain of Custody 

F - Protocol 
[ , .. 

c 

[ 

c 

[ 

c 

m 

E 

[ 

APPENDIX A 

[ COMPUTER DATA 

I 

[J "' 

~ " 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 
[ CALCULATION SUMMARY SHEET 

[>LANT: Huntington Plating 

Chrome Scrubber Stack 

1162 

UNIT: 

f)ROJECT#: 

rRun Number " 

Date 

__ Time 

.... 0 = Sample time 

~ Pb = Barometric Pressure at Port Elevation 

DVm = VoL of Metered Gas - meter cond., cal corr 

I..iI 

Tm = Meter Temperature 

1 ·Tm = Meter Temperature 

r-- Po = Meter Orifice Pressure 

I-. Pma = Meter Pressure Absolute 

-, Vtwet = Sampled Gas Volume Wet 

I-. 

Vtstd = Sampled Gas Volume at Stand. Cond., dry 

I Vtstd = Sampled Gas Volume at Stand. Cond.,dry 

r_ C02 = % C02, dry 

JJ 02 = % 02, dry 

nCO =%CO,dry 

U N2 = %N2,dry (N2+CO) = 100-(C02+02) 

--

EA = Excess Air -

Vw = Volume Water 

H2O = in gas 

H2O = Moisture in Gas at Saturation 

'- Md = Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas 

Mw = Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas "-

Psg = Stack Pressure, gauge - measured 

Psa = Stack Pressure, absolute 

Ts = Stack Temperature 

1 

10-6-05 

900 - 1110 

120 

29.61 

93.048 

80.6 

540.6 

1.93 

29.75 

103.310 

90.384 

2.559 

0.11 

19.10 

0.00 

80.79 

827.1 

51.0 

2.59 

11.93 

28.78 

28.50 

-0.55 

29.57 

121.10 

2 3 

10-6-05 10-6-05 

1150 - 1355 1425 - 1630 

120 120 

29.61 29.60 

97.908 94.220 

89.4 91.5 

549.4 551.5 

1.98 1.99 

29.76 29.75 

107.614 102.002 

93.593 89.697 

2.650 2.540 

0.11 0.11 

19.10 19.10 

0.00 0.00 

80.79 80.79 

827.1 827.1 

53.0 34.0 

2.60 1.75 

13.10 12.54 

28.78 28.78 

28.50 28.59 

-0.55 -0.55 

29.57 29.56 

124.50 122.90 

minutes 

in.Hg 

cu. ft 

Farenheit 

Rankine 

in. H20 

in.HA 

cu. ft 

cu.ft 

cu. Meter 

% 

% 

% 

% 

% 

I grams 

% 

% 

in. H20 

in.Hg 

Farenheit 
r CALCULATION SUMMARY SHEET 

r~LANT: Huntington Plating 

UNIT: Chrome Scrubber Stack 

f'ROJECT #:. 1162 

r Run Number ~. 

Ts 

Ts 

f-\11l P 

~Vs 

mVs 

U 

As 

FlQa 

,-Qs 

'-IR. 

""Mn 

-Cs 

IER 

-

L 

o 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

= Stack Temperature 

= Stack Temperature 

= A vg. Sum. of Pressure Square Root 

= Velocity in the Stack 

= Velocity in the Stack 

= Effective Stack Area 

= Volumetric Flow Rate at stack condo 

= Volumetric Flow Rate, stand. cond., dry 

= Isokinetic Ratio {VnlVs)*l00 

= Total Chrome Concentration 

= Total Chrome Concentration 

= Total Chrome Emissions 

1 2 

322.50 324.39 

581.1 584.5 

0.774 0.773 

2,769.1 2,773.7 

46.15 46.20 

804.2 804.2 

15,465 15,490 

13,528 13,469 

91.2 94.9 

< 15 < 15 

< 0.0059 < 0.0057 

< 2.97E-04 < 2.86E-04 

3 

323.50 Kelvin 

582.9 Rankine 

0.766 

2,740.9 ftImin 

45.70 ft/sec 

804.2 Lsq. in. 

15,307 acfm 

13,459 dscfm 

91.0 % 

< 15 UK 

< 0.0059 mg/dscm 

< 2.98E-04 lbs/hr 
·1. 

r 'TEST, Inc. rTO~ Chrome Sampling Data , Project #_1_16_2_____ Meter Box # 2010 O/OC02 _0._11 __ 

Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 %02 19.10 

[ Unit/Stack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pilot Cal. (Cp) 0.84 %CO __ _ 

" Operator MB Nozzle # %N2 80.79 ------- Run # 1 Nozzle Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 10.00 

[ Date-I-0--6-O-5---- Stack Dia.(in.)-32-- F"mal Moist. %_2._59 __ 

Sample TIme 120 Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Final Isokinetic % 91.2 ------- ---

Imp. 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

[ 

Minlpt 5 Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.61 Initiall..eak Rate 0.017 cfm @ 

Pi lIter # 23 Leak Check Vol. Fmal LeakR ate 0012 . cfm@ 

[ 

,-

[~ 

I 

I> 

-

( 

L. ,I 

t

J 

, : 

t 

l 

I. 

Portl 

Point 

1-12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

2-12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Dry Gas Pitot 

Time Meter(CF) Velocity 

900 54.515 ("H20) 

905 58.440 0.81 

910 62.520 0.81 

15 67.370 0.76 

920 70.860 0.76 

925 74.880 0.72 

930 79.110 0.72 

935 83.090 0.64 

940 86.620 0.64 

945 89.940 0.37 

950 93.070 0.34 

955 98.510 0.34 

1000 99.056 0.34 

1015 104.030 1.10 

1020 108.180 0.76 

1025 112.470 0.74 

1030 115.720 0.58 

1035 119.200 0.50 

1040 122.810 0.50 

1045 126.140 0.46 

1050 129.570 0.55 

1055 132.990 0.55 

1100 136.710 0.57 

1105 139.990 0.57 

1110 143.514 0.57 

Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter 

Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. 

("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) 

2.55 0.897 6.0 116 246 253 

2.55 0.897 6.0 120 248 256 

2.45 0.869 7.0 118 249 250 

2.45 0.869 7.0 121 249 249 

2.25 0.845 7.0 119 250 251 

2.25 0.845 7.0 120 250 250 

2.05 0.797 6.0 121 249 250 

2.05 0.727 6.0 120 248 250 

1.15 0.606 4.0 119 249 252 

1.11 0.581 4.0 123 250 250 

1.11 0.581 4.0 124 249 250 

1.11 0.581 4.0 123 249 251 

3.55 1.040 8.0 123 250 251 

2.45 0.869 7.0 122 247 249 

2.35 0.857 7.0 120 249 251 

1.75 0.759 6.0 120 247 250 

1.55 0.704 5.0 121 251 250 

1.55 0.704 5.0 123 250 250 

1.45 0.676 5.0 122 249 250 

1.65 0.739 5.0 122 248 249 

1.65 0.739 5.0 121 248 250 

1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 251 

1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 250 

1.75 0.752 5.0 123 249 250 

Initial Fmal 

719 718 

702 721 

637 644 

1005 1031 

10 "Hg 

10 "H 19 

Imp. Dry Gas 

Temp. Temp. 

(F) In Out 

68 77 75 

68 77 75 

68 77 75 

68 78 75 

68 78 75 

68 79 76 

68 79 76 

68 79 76 

68 81 77 

67 82 77 

67 82 78 

66 83 78 

68 81 79 

68 84 80 

68 84 80 

68 84 80 

68 85 81 

68 85 82 

68 86 82 

68 86 82 

68 87 83 

67 87 83 

67 88 84 

67 88 84 
Example Calculations 

Run Number 1 

Pb = 29.61 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp = 0.84 Pitot Cal 

Vw = 51 Water weight gain Os = 32 in. Stack Diameter 

[ 

[ 

[ Pm = 1.93 "H2O Meter pressure As = 804.2 Sqin. Stack Area 

Avg 11 P = 0.613 "H2O Differential pressure On = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter 

Avg Sqrtl1 P = 0.774 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. Tt = 120 min Sample Time r %C02 = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide %CO = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide 

[ 

%02 = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 = 80.79 Nitrogen 

Vm = 88.999 acf 

Ps = -0.55 "H2O 

[ Tm = 80.6 (F) 

Ts = 121.1 (F) 

D Vmstd= 17.65.vm*[Pb+ii:] 

Tm(R) 

o 

[ Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw = 0.0471 * 

Bws= Vwgas 

Vrnstd + Vwgas 

93.048 (acf· Y) Dry Gas Volume 

29.57 "Hg Stack Pressure 

540.6 (R) Meter Temperature 

581.1 (R) Stack Temperature 

[ 

.L2l 

= 17.65 * 93.048 * 29.61 + 13.6 

540.6 

51 = 2.4021 sft 3 

J

= 90.384 sft j 

1.506 scfm 

Bws* 100 = 2.59 % Moist. Md ===28=.7=8=2= 

I-Bws = 0.9741 MW = 28.503 

===== 

L 

I 

L Vs = 5129.4 • Cp • ~lliID Ps • Mw * sqrt 11 P 

581.1 o 5129.4 * 0.84 * \ 29.57 * 28.503 * 0.774 = 2,769.1 fpm ==46=.1 .... 5==fps 

L ACFM = Vs * As 

144 

2,769.1 * 804.2 = 15,465 ACFM 

DSCFM= 

L 

L % Iso. = 

I ,-

I 

144 

ACFM * 528 * Ps * (l-Bws) 

Ts (R) * 29.92 

1039 * Yrnstd * Ts CR) 

(I-Bws) * Ps * Tt * Vs * (Dn)1\2 

1,039 * 90.384 

0.9741 • 29.57 • 120 

15,465 * 528 • 29.57 

581.1 • 29.92 

• 0.9741 = 

* 581.1 = 91.2 % 

* 2,769.1 * 0.06250 

13,528 DSCFM ======= 
rTEST, Inc. 

I 

Comments: 

fTOtal Chrome Sampling Data . 

. Project #~1_16;..;;2_____ Meter Box # 2010 %C020.ll --- Imp. Initial Final 

Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 r UnitlStack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp) _0_.84 __ 

.. Operator_MB______ Nozzle # __ _ 

%02 19.10 

%CO --- %N2 80.79 

1 721 727 

2 705 723 

3 642 649 

[ 

Run #~2______ Nozzle Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 10.00 

. Date 10-6-05 Stack Dia.(in.)-32-- Fmal Moist. %_2._60 __ 

4 1031 1053 

5 

Sample Tnne_l_20 ______ Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Fmal Isokinetic % 94.9 

.-.....;-- 6 

C Minlpt 5 Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.61 

Fil ter # 29 Leak Ch ec k V o. 1 m ate c 19 

Initial Leak Rate 0.018 cfm @ 

p' alLeakR 0017 fm@ 

15 "Hg 

15 "H 

( Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter hnp. Dry Gas 

Portl Tune Meter(CF) Velocity Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. 

Point 1150 45.616 ("H20) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) In Out 

2-12 1155 51.330 0.93 2.85 0.942 6.0 124 248 244 68 87 85 

, 11 1200 54.250 0.93 2.85 0.942 6.0 124 249 256 68 88 86 

r 10 1205 58.070 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 125 249 252 68 88 86 

9 1210 61.900 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 124 249 250 68 89 86 

8 1215 65.720 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 124 249 249 68 90 87 

t· 7 1220 69.320 0.50 1.65 0.721 6.0 124 249 250 67 91 87 

6 1225 73.140 0.56 1.85 0.763 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 87 

It 5 1230 76.660 0.48 1.55 0.706 6.0 125 249 251 67 91 87 

4 1235 80.190 0.48 1.55 0.706 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 87 

r; 3 1240 84.000 050 1.65 0.763 6.0 126 249 250 67 92 87 

2 1245 87.800 0.50 1.65 0.763 6.0 125 249 250 66 92 88 

1 1250 91.460 0.50 1.65 0.763 6.0 124 250 250 66 92 88 

G 

1-12 1300 95.970 0.78 2.60 0.900 7.0 126 246 250 68 91 88 

11 1305 100.420 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 125 249 250 68 91 88 

I: 10 1310 104.860 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 125 250 250 67 91 89 

9 1315 107.920 0.76 2.55 0.889 7.0 124 249 249 67 91 89 

,I 8 1320 112.720 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 248 250 67 91 89 

1\ 7 1325 116.850 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 249 250 67 91 89 

6 1330 120.930 0.66 2.21 0.818 6.0 124 250 250 67 91 89 

5 1335 124.650 0.53 1.70 0.742 6.0 124 250 250 67 92 89 

4 1340 128.360 0.53 1.70 0.742 6.0 124 252 250 67 92 90 

I 3 1345 132.340 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 252 250 68 93 90 

l.. 2 1350 135.720 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 251 250 68 93 90 

I 1 1355 139.263 0.46 1.50 0.691 5.0 124 251 250 68 92 90 
r 

Example Calculations 

r Run Number 2 

Ph = 29.61 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp = 0.84 Pitot Cal 

r Vw = 53 Water weight gain Ds = 32 in. Stack Diameter 

Pm = 1.98 "H2O Meter pressure As = 804.2 Sqin. Stack Area 

Avg l!. P = 0.606 "H2O Differential pressure Dn = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter 

r Avg Sqrtl!. P = 0.773 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. Tt = 120 min Sample Time 

%CO2 = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide %CO = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide 

%02 = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 = 80.79 Nitrogen 

[ Vm = 93.647 acf 97.908 (acf* Y) Dry Gas Volume 

Ps = -0.55 "H2O 29.57 "Hg Stack Pressure 

Tm = 89.4 (F) 549.4 (R) Meter Temperature 

[ Ts = 124.5 (F) 584.5 (R) Stack Temperature 

o Vmstd = 17.65 * Vm * [Ph + I~J Tm(R) 

= 17.65 * 97.908 *[ 29.61 

. 549.4 

+ ~ ]

= 93.593 sft j 

1.560 scfrn 

o 

[ Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw = 

[ 

I 

[j 

Bws = Vwgas 

Vmstd + Vwgas 

Vs = 5129.4 * 

0.0471 * 

Ts(R) 

Ps*Mw 

53 = 2.4963 sft 3 

Bws*100 = 2.60 % Moist. Md = 28.782 

==== ===== 

I-Bws = 0.9740 MW = 28.502 

==== ===== 

* sqrt l!. P 

o 5129.4 * 0.84 I 584.5 

* \ -2-9.-57...;;..;...;....;.*-2-8-.5-02-* 0.773 = 2,773.7 fpm 46.2 fps 

===== 

L ACFM= Vs * As 

144 

2,773.7 * 804.2 = 15,490 ACFM 

DSCFM= 

L 

L % Iso. = 

L 

! 

144 

ACFM * 528 * Ps * (l-Bws) 

Ts (R) * 29.92 

1039 * Vmstd * Ts cru 

(l-Bws) * Ps * Tt * Vs * (On)"2 

1,039 * 93.593 

0.9740 * 29.57 * 120 

15,490 * 528 * 29.57 * 0.9740 = 13,469 DSCFM 

======= 584.5 * 29.92 

* 584.5 = 94.9 % 

* 2,773.7 * 0.06250 
[TEST, Inc. I 

Comments: 

[Total Chrome Sampling Data . 

-. Project #_1_16_2_____ Meter Box # 2010 'foC020.11 --- hnp. Initial Final 

Plant Huntington Plating Meter Cal. (Y) 1.0455 r UnitlStack Chrome Scrubber Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp)...;.,0 . ...;.,84 __ 

Operator~MB=-_____ Nozzle # __ _ 

[

Run # 3 Nozzle Dia. (in.) 0.25 Assumed Moist % 5.00 ~------ --- --- . Date 10-6-05 Stack Dia.(in.) 32 Final Moist. %_1._75 __ 

%02 19.10 

%CO --- %N2 80.79 

1 725 727 

2 708 717 

3 643 646 

4 1053 1073 

5 

Sample Time...;;.I.;;..20~ _____ Static Press.("H20) -0.55 Final Isokinetic %91.0- 6 

[ 

Minlpt 5 Bar. Press. ("Hg) 29.60 Initial Leak Rate 0.01 

Filt 1 er # 228 Leak Ch ec k V o. I Fmal Leak R ate 0 03 c Lg 

cfm @ 13 "Hg --- fm@ 13 "H 

Dry Gas Pitat Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter Imp. Dry Gas 

( Portl Time Meter(CF) Velocity Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. _. 

Point 1425 39.561 (" H2O) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) In Out 

1-12 1430 42.990 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 127 224 68 91 90 

! 

11 1435 47.290 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 125 256 68 92 90 

r 10 1440 51.080 0.76 2.55 0.859 5.0 126 250 68 93 91 

9 1445 53.980 0.70 2.52 0.853 5.0, 126 251 68 93 91 

8 1450 58.250 0.70 2.52 0.853 6.0 125 250 68 93 90 

r~ 7 1455 61.890 0.70 2.52 0.853 6.0 126 250 68 93 90 

6 1500 66.030 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 250 68 93 90 

I 5 1505 70.150 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 251 68 93 90 

4 1510 74.010 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 95 250 68 93 90 

I' 3 1515 78.070 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 97 249 68 93 91 2 1520 82.110 0.60 1.95 0.790 6.0 126 250 68 93 91 

1 1525 85.623 0.44 1.45 0.676 5.0 118 250 68 93 91 

L 2-12 1535 89.770 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 126 251 68 93 91 

11 1540 93.910 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 124 248 68 93 91 

10 1545 98.000 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 126 250 68 92 91 

9 1550 102.140 0.66 2.21 0.828 6.0 125 250 68 93 91 

II 8 1555 105.590 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 124 249 68 92 91 

7 1600 109.040 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 125 250 68 92 91 

6 1605 112.500 0.46 1.55 0.691 5.0 127 250 68 92 90 

5 1610 115.960 0.46 1.55 0.691 6.0 127 250 68 92 90 

4 1615 119.410 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 127 250 68 92 90 

I 3 1620 122.840 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 126 249 68 92 90 

L 2 1625 126.260 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 126 250 68 92 90 

I 1 1630 129.681 0.45 1.45 0.684 6.0 127 250 68 91 90 

l 
l. 

[~ 

Example Calculations 

Run Number 3 

Ph = 29.60 "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp = 0.84 Pitot Cal 

l. Vw = 34 Water weight gain Ds = 32 in. Stack Diameter 

Pm = 1.99 "H2O Meter pressure As = 804.2 Sqin. Stack Area 

Avg Il P = 0.593 "H2O Differential pressure On = 0.25 in Nozzle Diameter 

[ AvgSqrtll P = 0.766 "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. n = 120 ID1D Sample Time 

o/oC02 = 0.11 Carbon Dioxide %CO = 0.00 Carbon Monoxide 

%02 = 19.10 Oxygen %N2 = 80.79 Nitrogen 

[ Vm = 90.12 acf 94.22 (acf* Y) DIy Gas Volume 

Ps = -0.55 "H2O 29.56 "Hg Stack Pressure 

Tm = 91.5 (F) 551.5 (R) Meter Temperature [ Ts = 122.9 (F) 582.9 (R) Stack Temperature 

0 Vmstd = 17.65' Vm -[ Ph + 1~ J .[ .L22 ]= '- = 17.65 * 94.220 29.60 + 13.6 89.697 sft 'j 

Tm(R) 551.5 1.495 scfm 

Q r' Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw = 0.0471 * 34 = 1.6014 sft 3 

L 

I 

L 

o 

Bws= Vwgas Bws*100 = 1.75 % Moist. Md = 28.782 

Vmstd + Vwgas I-Bws = 0.9825 MW = 28.593 

TsCR) 

Vs= 5129.4*Cp* Ps*Mw * sqrt Il P 

582.9 

5129.4 * 0.84 * \ 29.56 * 28.593 * 0.766 = 2,740.9 fpm ==4=5.=7==fps 

L ACFM= Vs* As 

144 

2,740.9 * 804.2 = 15,307 ACFM 

144 

l 

DSCFM = ACFM * 528 * Ps * (l-Bws) ! Ts (R) * 29.92 

15,307 • 528 * 29.56 • 0.9825 = 

582.9 * 29.92 

l. % Iso. = 1039 * Vrnstd * Ts CR) 

(l-Bws) * Ps * n· Vs * (Dn)A2 

1,039 * 89.697 • 582.9 = 91.0 % 

-0-.-98-2-5---·---2-9-.5-6---·---1-2-0---*--2-,7-40-.9--·--0-.0-6-25-0-

13,459 DSCFM 
·r 

r 

r 

r 

r 

[ 

D 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

L 

D 

L 

L 

It. 

l 

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

TOTAL CHROME 

lbslhr= mg 

Vmstd 

X __ I...i;g;:...r_ x DSCFM x 

64.8 mg 

DSCFM* = Stack Flow Rate 

60 min 

Ihr 

Vmstd* = Volwne of dry gas sampled at standard 

conditions dry standard cubic feet 

* 29.92 "Hg, 68 degrees F (760 mmHg, 20 degrees C) 

lib 

x---

7,000 gr 
[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

C 

1m 

biI 

D 

[ 

[ 

I 

L 

~ 

[ 

L 

L 

L 

L 

l. 

, . . 

APPENDIXB 

ANALYTICAL DATA 
l. 

t. 

r 

[ 

o 

Q 

[ 

L 

I 

L 

o 

I 

I. 

l 

.:. TEST. Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33-B Poca, 'IN 25159 

(304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

TI I 1162 

HUNTINGTON PLATING. HUNTINGTON. W. V. 

EPA KETHOD 306 - CHROHIUH EMISSIONS 

RUN #1 (IHPINGER COL. VOL.- 500ml) 

Sampled by TI/HB 

Laboratory Number TIB9729 

Date Sampled 10/06/05 

Date Received 10/10/05 

ANALYSIS FoR REQUESTED P~S 

ALL RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS 

PARAMETER RESULT HDL UNITS METHOD 

Respectfully 

;Z'~ R122905 0841 

ANALYZED 

DATEITIKEIANALYST 

Chromium (Total) NO 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:45 RJE 

NO ~ Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) 

REF: USEPA: Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste:SW846 3rd Ed.:Nov.1986. 

REF: USEPA Method 306 . Determination Of Chromium Emissions 

Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile Labratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
r 

r 

[ 

[ 

o 

[ 

L 

I 

L 

o 

~.~ ~ TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33-B Poca. WV 25159 

(304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

TI/1162 

HUNTINGTON PLATING. HUNTINGTON. W.V. 

EPA METHOD 306 - CHROHIUYH EMISSIONS 

RUN 12 (IHPINGER COL. VOL.- 500HL) 

Sampled by TI/HB 

Laboratory Number TIB9730 

Date Sampled 10/06/05 

Date Received 10/10/05 

ANALYSIS FOR REQUESTED PARAMETERS 

ALL RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS 

RESULT MOL UNITS METHOD 

Respectfully 

Submitted: 

~~ R122905 0842 

ANALYZED 

DATEITIMEIANALYST 

Chromium (Total) ND 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:50 RJE 

NO Q Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) 

REF: USEPA; Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste;SW846 3rd Ed.;Nov.1986. 

REF: USEPA Method 306 - Determination Of Chromium Emissions 

Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile Labratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
r. 

1. 

r 

[ 

[ 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

L 

o 

L 

L 

L 

~ •• 

~ TEST. Inc. 

Route 2. Box 33-B Poca. WV 25159 

(304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax 

Laboratory Analysis Report 

'TI/1162 

HUNTINGTON PLATING, HUNTINGTON, W. V .

EPA HElHOO 306 - CHROHIUH EMISSIONS 

RUN #3 (IHPINGER Cal. VOL. - 500Ml) 

Sampled by TI/MB 

laboratory Number TIB9731 

Date Sampled 10/06/05 

Date Received 10/10/05 

ANAlYSIS FOR REQUESTED PARAHETERS 

All RESULTS ARE ON AN AS RECEIVED BASIS 

PARAMETER RESULT HDl UNITS METHOD 

Respectfully 

Submitted: 

~~ Rl22905 0842 

ANAlYZED 

DATEITlKEIANAlYST 

Chromium (Total) NO 15.0 ug SW6010B 10/18/05 16:55 RJE 

NO D Not detected at a concentration greater than or equal to the method detection limit (MOL) 

REF: USEPA: Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste:SW846 3rd Ed.:Nov,1986. 

REF: USEPA Method 306 - Determination Of Chromium Emissions 

Stack Sampling and Analysis-Mobile labratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

c 

m :l 

0 

[ 

APPENDIXC 

[ FIEID DATA SHEETS 

I 

Q 

~ 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

l 
-. Pllter 1# 0 l-J Leak Chock Vol. 

~ I~fjqo.. p~~ Orlftao . '9rtI Tim •. Metor(CP} Velocity p,.,. 'omt I~ t,c~ It:rt 'MOO) (!1I2.0\ 

~, I 

I - It ctr 5""6', If., , • ~I 2..,!i'~-

,t- '.0 , z.., oJ'L. . Itt , 'z .j;jI It> 1';- "7.>./' ,,7(' :/, ... "f ... -

I ttl 20 "lo,T" , 7t. 'l., T.>-: 

1, RJ l..S )'1.8-! ' • .7 t. 'l,L~ 

C, I~ . Jet >';,11 '.r 71. L. Lt' 

, oJ.$' ~~,()C; It y oz. ,,~-

J" y,' SC.o (,l • £, "( 1, v.;.-

l .. T.J':' ~.),'f 'i 37 1,(:'''':" . ;f s·C' 'il.07 I Jy (.t I 

I 2.. ;>$" «t~.j , 1 3"1 i. I.' 

1 tcco ... \.., , 9f.osl, " J'I 00 ( " 

e 

, \ lo- LL .' IT 'OI(,d.J , I, I .3.sS - .. -tr ~o tct'· , t " 7(, L.'t'r 

[ ~ 

, , 

U" III t. 'i)- ,·7"1 ,'t. ~ 

y 3D' oS",ll.. ,sO t.7') 

1 

1t .)6 "cr. 1.0 ISO /.J-.r 

) Ii" , l..1.;I-, . ..)\.) i.'s> 

, ..,,6 iu.,y' , "Oft, [, 7.r 

1 0 .r §~ , ,L.l.s7 ',ss- ",;- 'I lJ, .;,--J; , I.l L. t'l • ~S- I, C';- . ,I .. l IIIJ6' 1 . IJ'. 71' fJ-~ I. 7~-

i: 11 c>6"' IJf .. t1 'I. ,~.., 1.'7's 

I' , I tI~ 1'1~ • .s/¥ ~;] ',7';-

1 " 

L, 

-. 

PlnaBAde llato· cJ # Dr "L 

P'lmp. Stack Probo 

bt.o Vat=\lUJt1 '''7:'-, Temp. 

(oln) Mfa.l m 

.H·? C' lIt 4 

~,..t' 

,£-o o 0 t:. , ) 10 , :?.,.;. 

, -s--( 'I. .) ''JIT 'l.. 'r1 

,;(,1 ',.., I 1., 21'J 

Ii" s- '7 1117 lSt> 

.~'rS ? ''l.C ~ ~" .7' .., t. '" 1..( , 1 yr 

("71 , " It () 2'U 

,'(./~ , 'I I, 't ' 't"'~ 

.s-~I 'if 0 ;' \.). , "$t.' 

,Srf 'f /1. "1 2.."1 ~ 

.J ,1 '-t t 1..) l'rf 

i.elf G I ~.l Uo 0, 

~5t' 1 Il. -L "t.., ,"I . 

:li-'1 ., 11.0 l..." 

.7j~ 6 "1.0 2..'(7 

• ")041 j- 11.f 2.,jl 

t ,,:0( S rt..,l 2.YC 

,01 ~- 12.1..' l. )' f 

, 1J1 ,S- ' " 1. \. ~"'f 

I 7J'i S- I'l..l ·t., b-

",J-1.. S- , 1..~ tt, 

"Z7 I • ,,)SL r i 1.1 " 

(75 l. $- il..J l..£f~ 

Imp. ~'~:: ....nltlal Finnl ,~ t' o'/f'1 )/1' 0 

2. ' )0 t;,' .~'l...( 

3 'J"7 ,fie{ 

4 I oOs- , o:¥'\ 

S 

6' din ~ -,-()-~'H-8-0-0 .... - oftn@ Ii>. -Hg -

'Utcr Imp. DryO.aa Temp. T~p.' Xemp. 

(F)., (P) In Oqt 

lsl ,'~J ?'> >,r 

z~,,· (.J: 17 ).J 

' 'l~-Gl ' ,'h >" 7:l

~.,.v '''' >01- ~-

t~-, c:J- '1, >~-

~St' ,~ )of .,C' 

2J(' . t'z, , '" 7(, 

'..,~ c,' 'b '71 >( 

'Z:il {b' 0,., 0'1> 

'ls c.' ,'? fl. ~~ 

:lsc' C'> I-t. "}J-

"l..J , " rJ '7J. 

1.~, ,'S of, >f 

1 y~ C'S- o 5-., 

t,Y( f.b J't '"' ro 

'l.yo l~ ".., .Tt' 

l~'O ,~ !a'I .f-/ 

~.)c ' a Is oft 

l J'C: "~ ;..( It}

l,.'r 1 (6 5( .i

1.J(I ,'b $0) I-J 

"U I (7 ,f) f-J 

" ' 

'\. J (I , 7 41- fo

lJ(: f, $".t- Iy 

.' t. 

' 
CoiMlOPt.t: f, Oz..C - ~c:'. I.O'\? -"';' , 

- _. Pllter II' 2..1 Leak Check Vol. Plnal'Leak bto -o~J 7 otln@ 1$- , ·Hg -

L DryOas "tot Otlftoo Pump' S~ Probo I'llto&' I",p. Dl'fQ~ 

"trtI Tlmo 'M~r(CP) VolOcity ti ..... Rate Vao\lum ''feJnP. Temp. Temp, Temp· ' 3'emp. 

Nat IiS'O '15:," O{ '("H2O) . (!'mOl (oln) Mfa.) m. (p) m' m In Ovt 

~ 'i.- , st .. )l ' . 

" }'l.,'f • It.. ~~ ,~J '"LJ-.r '~'1L '2.'f-t 2.Y., ~8 5"';> 3S 

" 

tt I L90 Sy. t.r , .. en 'l.,~; • ),'Y ~ t. " 11/1 'l."~ 1.)-& ,'if 6-1- 6-, 

I' to os :s IF ,(,-", ' ,S' " (,I'S- ,?, l, " '('#-r '2.-r:f 'ZSL , i.& 6-,. J, 

, 10 (.(.50 ,s, I.~.) , l)( >. ," P·T ~'r 1 ,"l$Q (;8 ' 51 ~c 

r i- tS.7L ' .5" .. /.11 ;- ~)t l " , Vf" 1. :'-1 ,&' . It" 'Z. ., 'i -to ;) 

f , 1.0 (.1.ll. ~ib IJjS' ~"'r..( t It., l..,ct UQ " ~( g:-~ 

I£.., 4 l.~, ..,J.I'{ .5Ca 'I.~.r I Jt.) (. I l.j" 't., ~ , tso , Co 7 , C;/, ;) 

t ,- ,)0 ..". ,<. , V/; ( ':;5:' t )o( " t\.r l. Y'i 2.~ ; ''7 1'1 3-') ~ 

'# :1';- sc~ it, ,tiB , ,,s,J-: 1)0'" C . 2.'r~ '2,J"'O - I t;- C " '11 )"} 

;l 'f0 H.eo • .$c I. , .;- • 'C) l ,z. \. ' 'l.'I f lSV (-; crt '~? 

I l. yr s-7./sCJ ,.:) (; (.(j- ,1( J , IL~ 1.'1f ' 'l.~ ({ <)'~ i-f 

I .s-c , <i I, 'iLO ;~- " ... .1(..3 l I L 'f '\.$'- Ie 11. 5t 'o(~ l.a"u 

r. I -

It ;,-~ 

Il.. (1 00 9S.~ ) . .,y l,C , '1'()(.! ? r1{. 1.",' ~.s-c '8 'it ~ 

1 Ii or ~OO, It l. . ](, "l..~r ~Iki'; 7 I "\..~- 2..~ c; "l,$o Gf. 'l( 8e, 

~ iO ,0 /(1f.~' 'ill '1.. j :;- ·.li'i 7 ( 1..)- LSO ,,~.~ C'? 91 'b

cr . . - fb), ,. t.. ,7t . ,t.;r ,Hl " t 1.J 1111 ~'f'i (.' '7 ell l-1 I~ 

r~ S- l() flL 7 L. J(.C z. L I ,b'lY G 11.Y 1..'18 "Zso , ) rr-I .f'

'1 1" ili,.fI" i~{. i.l.t ."'~ , i'LV ,'f 1 1.JC'- ,~ 'PI n " JO (to.e;) , ' (. (. , :t,.tI ,Jtb' i. ,;t5 ' l..lO ue ,~ t;1 It 

t ' l ' 

S J .. ; , It; • f.> ',;) to "} ,7'tL (, 11'1 Z:;Hi U,· ~7 '7L :--i 

't, 'f 'tfJ, IU' ,.It .S3 " 7 

,,"It... t II Y tyt 'l.P t7 1l '10 

" \ ..) Ill., ~t{ , ,tt l ' 't- I,S oJ ,(. ., , ,~ , I If\ \ on, , !jV c..~ 'i! c;" 

l.. oSf1 IJS'. 'n .1L (,) " ~I S' : " " 

'S- 'I. It ., )) ( 'ljli Cfl fc 

\' , ~J' {lit ... ,; '(( {oj ., Itt_ -

.J )1.'1 'til 130 i./i 'iL ,0 

[ .' '. ,to 

t. ' \ 

, ' 

" - ..... ~4~"-....!. 
-. "'ter tI 'l. '1 T Leak chock Vol. Plnal·LeakRato· o"c>.~ .@ J,(. -Hg - ~' DI')' aa. PtfO~ Odftao . Pump' S .. Probl PI.ltor Imp . DryO~ .,., TIm. ·M~r.(CP) . Vo1oolty ,,.,, Rat.o Va~\lum . 'l)fnp: Temp. Temp. Temp .. remp . .... blllt J't't,>. :J',s(.( . MOO) ·r.mO) (oAn) Mfa.} (ft' (P) (F). (P) In (Nt 

~ . /- tL .)0 '{2,11 (7/ Z.;S';- ,1;1 S ,S" . /1,7 • - 2-'LV (tf "1 '10 

It J.1" "1',7..'7 ,." 'l. ,jf'" ;hi' oS- J1S - zSG. (8 91. ·'0 ' . 

10 .,0 ·~,.o! , .. " : 'l..c . .;-,J- l'U' <; . r-& ·I.'"}. , - ·z..so \ '5 'I) 'il 

-1 'j VI sl ~~ ,"10 z .. rl .. ,5'..f".J .~ ..... il.' - ?Sf (~ 'J r, 

r. So 58.1,..\ ., ,. . ~"")O '2. ';-'l.. ~}S" .) , n.S - LSO (S 'l '0 

f" ') ~-~- , ,. ~ Cj '.10 1. ~:""L , lJi,' ) , I""L' . - 2.~O (.8 7.1 '0 

~ 

, ISoC (,(,.0.1 Itt '1.. 1. f I~l~ , t1....r - ~so . 'lJ f) 

, S o~- 70.1s.- '"" .tt, ·z. t t .ttf ~ i"'2.. ., - 2S'- ~6 '1J to 

v 10 7JI,ol ',(;0 I,~S. ,)'6 C· 9s - ·l..So 'Ei '1 90 

;l (S 13",07 .. '0 . /.jr I '7 'i 0 , '1) - z..1f~ ~t, 9J ?I 

It L L",.., 8'L, II .. '0 t t,r . ').,' , h.t - 2.SC' '" "..l ." 

f t- ~'c;l,l • 'tV It '{oS . L)l - it ~ - t$(i ,s 'i'J ~ ;t . ~ 

IS .10 ~ .,. .- ~ - - ... .. ". .. 

['i 2 - It. ~j- ~.77 ,'t '2.1. I .rlr 6 11.£ - 'l.S1 (",b .,.) 

.. /1 4'0 '1.!.{ ( " , it 'l.l..I i-'4L t 1.1' ( I). 'f - 2.,(6'" . (6- ~J ';, 

~ .. 

.ll t 10 v'; cr.r: "0 .. (. '2, l. ( " /1.(. - 2. :;-c.' 'f 5'1. "il .. ''1 ..;el (?.J-- ,~ ~J v, loL.Jy ,l. Co . ·l. l { .pt b - I j" 

, & S,.i·- loS',~ ,Y( i.;~ :lH ,... Il.~ - ~ 'f~ ~b tL 9, I ~ 

, " "0 10 'i. 0'1 ., yl I.~r • (, ~I ~ n.s - ~sc 'f 7t 'i, 

( oj In ... ..>'' ., ,1' . ,0 5 :> i' 'fI ~ iZ."] - nO 'E 1i. 'il 

t . .s 1<:- • 15. '7' . . , ., I- J1 .i) ,(.'r( . t 117 - £5" '6 9l 1'(

t·· v. t.,) .... ; b't. '{ r ,'f$ ;, 'iJ . ,(.~'t I.,. )11 - "2SC . (~ 'It. "ii:J 1'· . \ .J 20 U.,fy" . .1'> (, y; .( .. .\ '( .c.. It '\ v,t ,& C)1. 'io I '. - - I· . L : ; "2' lS0 . 'L l.J-· ~tL.t.L L'1J ,,-".J- ,t.J-( , - 'h 91 fCJ 

II ! I .10 1. ~. llrt ;Y3 f' '1' i" • (.6 'f , 'L 7 - l.se.' '8 'II 'i,. 

l " 

" " 

-t, 

1 ; .. . \ 

'0 
[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

~ 

m 

[ 

[ 

I 

~ 

m 

[ 

[ 

L 

L 

L 

L 

, .. ~ 

• 1 

APPENDIXD 

CALIBRATION DATA 
r 

ro 

[ 

r 

r 

[ 

o 

Q 

r: 

L 

I 

L 

o 

I 

l 

t 

1 

,~ 

Barometer 29.59 

Test Y 1.0515 

Dry Gas Meter Box Calibration 

Meter No. 2010 

Vw Tw 

Date 

Calibrator 

Vd Td 

OF 

Average Y = 1.0455 
r 

[ 

r 

r 

r. 

[: 

o 

o 

[ 

L 

I 

L 

o 

L 

L 

L 

l 

Barometer 29.4 

PreTest Y 1.0455 

Po Vac 

Dry Gas Meter Box Calibration 

Meter No. 2010 

Date 

Calibrator 

Vw Tw Vd 

csm 

Td Y 

OF 

78 

77 

77.5 

77 

Average Y= 1.0293 
·[ ,. . 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

c 

~ 

~ ~-

.[ 

[ APPENDIXE 

CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

I 

~ i" 

~ 

[ 

L 

L 

L 

L 

I 
r-:--"1 

~ 'L... 

r----: . .-. 

~ 

r----1' 

t I ,--, , , 

. l ~ 

-....: ~ ~ 

./ .. :--

CHAIN OF CUSTODY.' .' ':. ~,' 

i CLIENT NAME: t-l v I\\\.( Nl-\.l". . <p/~ 1\(i REQUESTED ANALYSIS COMMENTS , 

, PROJECf NAME: 

PROJECI' LOCATION: "'lIl\~,o\ct-b", c..# 

~ PROJECT CONTACT: 

i PROJECf PHONE: ~ 

PROJECT ~GER: 

~ PROJECT NUMBER: 11(;'L. 

~ 2 i ~i J i \ 

~ ~ ~ ~. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 

~8 ~ 

(INCLUDE MATRIX) ~ . Z 

0 I I ;0 .. i. / , J -rt~7'12(j . 5 1 ::r""p 'Aloet c", i"",*,,,..,. 

'1.. 't, 'iO- L I ) C,) I"""p.~cr <:";I,.,;.,,,,&:.-\~. ?t-i!l} 730 - I 

~ / IJ F= 3 3 le-' ~-gt;731 z • ]; ,...,l'o .... _ Co. II ............ 

~ 031Lt«(O, '''' N~()#-) . Q Iv -'}1;-£" '7 g:J-, -

~ , ~ 

...:I 

~ 

::s 

< 

~ 

RELINQtJJSBED BY > DATE TIME REqIVEDBY , DATE TDd£ RECElVEDAT' 1ltAl\J) ~&= 

Q _1kL fk.se. 1{)--7 ~&£ lto/t4Jk ~ , 

(fJ RELINQtJJSBED BY DAlE TIldE BECElVEDBY DATE TDd£ NAMEOFlABOV.nnvro 

Q 

·0 . 
.[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

[ 

~ 

~ 

[ 

[ 

I 

c 

~ 

00 

[ 

[ 

L 

L 

L. 

L 

.~. . 

APPENDIXF 

PROTOCOL 
r ~~ TEST. Inc. 

~ Route 2, Sox 33·S Poea, WV 25159 

[ (304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099' Fax 

~ . www.wastelron.com 

~ 

l 

[ 

[ 

o 

C 

l. 

L. 

I 

L 

o 

l 

I 

I 

I 

t. 

STACK TEST PROTOCOL 

HUNTINGTON PLATING, INC. 

CHROME PLATING STACK 

HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA 

AUGUST 25, 2005 

~~+ • TEST, INCORPORATED 

Technical Environmental Services Team 

. .. . 

Route 2. Box 33-B. Poca. West Virginia 25159 Ph: (304) 755-1077 Fx: (304) 755-1099 

Stack Sampling and Analysis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
co. Tur, ;nco ~ Route 2, Box 33·8 Poca, WV 25159 

[ (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax 

_. www.wastetron.com 

Table of Contents 

Statement of Verification 

Stack Test Protocol Summary 

Introduction 

Description of Process 

Variances/Exemptions 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

Sampling Location 

Safety 

Example Calculations and Data Sheets 

Equipment Calibration 

Attachment 1 

Attachment 2 

Staek Sampling and Analysis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
[ 

[ 

[ 

D 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

L 

o 

L 

L 

L 

L 

TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 

(304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 fax 

www.wastetron.com 

Statement of Verification 

• '1 • 

I hereby affinn that to the best of my knowledge all State and Federal regulations applicable to 

each source to be tested have been reviewed, and all testing requirements therein have been 

incorporated into the test plan and that all information provided will not be falsified_ 

7l~-.~ Paul Chinuntdet 

Director of Testing 

Stack Sampling and Analysis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 

, 
I-~. ~.I;"'. ~ Route 2. Box 33·8 Poea. WV 25159 r (304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax I . www.wastetron.eom 

~ 

r 

[ 

STACK TEST PROTOCOL SUMMARY 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

r' 

I 

L 

o 

L 

1 

t 

t 

! 

I. 

I. Source Information: 

A.Name: 

B. Address: 

C. Person to Contact: 

D. Title: 

E. Telephone: 

E. Name of Source: 

F. Permit Number: 

O. Plant Identification Number: 

n. Testing Firm Information: 

A.Name: 

B. Address: 

C. Person to Contact: 

D. Telephone: 

ITI. Tentative Test Date: 

A. Date: 

B. Time: 

IV. Sampling Information 

A. Pollutants to be sampled: 

B. EPA Methods: 

C. Number of sample runs: 

D. Number of sample points: 

E. Minimum Sample Time: 

F. Minimum Sample Volume: 

V. Sampling Location: 

A. Stack height: 

B. Inside diameter: 

C. Sampling ports height above ground: 

D. Port to upstream distance: 

E. Port to downstream distance: 

Stack Sampling and AnalYSis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 

Huntington Plating, Inc. 

625 Monroe Avenue 

Huntington, West Virginia 25704 

Tom Houvouras 

President 

(304) 522-0381 

Chrome Plating Stack 

TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33-B, 

Poca, West Virginia, 25159 

Paul Chinuntdet, Director of Testing 

(304) 755-1077 

October 6, 2005 

8:00-18:00 

Total Chrome 

1,2, 3A, 4, and 306 

3 per method 

To be detennined on-site 

120 minutes 

60 dscf 

25 feet 

32 inches 

10 feet 

9 feet 6 inches 

6 feet 6 inches 
1 

[ 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

r 

I 

L 

o 

TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 

(304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax 

www.wastetron.com 

JNTRODI TCTJON 

Stack Test Protocol 

Huntington Plating, Inc. 

Huntington, West Virginia 

Chrome Plating Stack 

t ., • 

Stack emission testing is to be performed at Huntington Platin& Inc. located in Huntington, West 

Virginia, by TEST, Incorporated, of Charleston, West Virginia. Huntington Platin& Inc. recently 

updated the emissions control system with a new composite mesh pad system. The purpose of 

the testing is to provide emissions data to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 

N and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality. The 

testing will be performed according to EPA Method 306 to detennine the concentrations of total 

chrome being emitted into the atmosphere via the Chrome Plating Stack. 

DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS 

Huntington Platin& Inc. owns and operates four hard chrome-electroplating tanks that had an 

initial startup date December 16, 1993. Each chrome tank is used to plate rods and cylinders. 

The emissions from the tanks are collected in composite mesh pad scrubbers located above each 

tank 

REQI JESTED VARIANCES/EXEMPTIONS 

There are no requests for variances to the proposed methods. 

Stack Sampling and Analysis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and AnalySis 
r 

[ 

[ 

o 

~ 

L 

[ 

I 

L 

o 

" 

L 

L 

I 

TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33·8 Poca, WV 25159 

(304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax 

www.wastetron.com 

SAMPLING AND ANAlYTICAl. PROCEDURES 

The testing will follow the procedures in the Appendix to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 

40, Chapter 1, Part 60, Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 306. 

po11ntant 

Total Chrome 

Method 

306 

MinntesfI'est 

120 

Volume/Sample 

60 dscf 

Leak checks will be performed on the sampling train before and after each run to prevent 

contamination. All components of the sampling train will be cleaned prior to each run. 

Velocity 

The velocity and stack temperature will be measured according to EPA Methods 1 and 2. 

Twelve traverse points will be used to measure the velocity at each sampling location. A Type-S 

Pitot tube and oil gauge manometer will be used to measure the velocity pressure in the stack. 

The stack temperature will be measured using a type-K thermocouple and digital temperature 

indicator. 

Moisture 

The flue gas moisture will be determined according to EPA Method 4. The moisture will be 

determined by measuring the "back-half' of the sampling train. 

Total Chrome 

The total chrome samples will be taken according to EPA Method 306. For each run, samples of 

ten-minute duration will be taken isokinetically from each of the twelve traverse points for a total 

sampling time of 120 minutes. The minimum sample volume will be at least 60 dscf. Blank 

samples will be collected for each reagent used during sampling and analyzed for contamination. 

The "front-half' of the sampling train will consist of a glass nozzle, non-heated glass probe, and 

glass filter bypass. 

Stack Sampling and Analysis - Mobile Laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
r. 

[ . 

r 

[ 

[ 

[ 

G 

o 

[ 

r 

I 

L 

o 

I 

I 

TEST, Inc. 

Route 2, Box 33·B Poca, WV 25159 

(304) 755·1077 (304) 755·1099 Fax 

www.wastetron.com 

The "back-half' of the sampling train will contain the following impingers: 

Tmpjoger Contents 

1 O.lNNaOH 

2 O.lNNaOH 

3 Empty 

4 Silica Gel 

AmOlmt 

100 mI. 

100 mI. 

400g 

parameter 

Total Chrome 

Total Chrome 

Moisture 

Moisture 

. ., . 

The "front-half' of the sampling train will be rinsed with O.lN NaOH recovered. The ''back-half' 

collections of the sampling train (back half of filter holder, impinger connectors, and impinger 

solutions 1,2, and 3) will be measured to detennine the moisture content and rinsed and 

recovered using 0.1 N NaOH. The samples will be analyzed by inductively coupled plasma 

emission spectrometry. 

SAMPI.ING lOCATION 

See enclosed Figure 

SAFETY REQIJIREMENTS 

All personnel entering the plant must follow all rules and regulations set by Huntington Plating, 

Inc. General safety guidelines should be followed which includes protective eyewear, hardhat, 

and work boots throughout the plant and ear protection in specified areas. The protective 

eyewear should be either ANSI approved safety glasses or goggles. All safety concerns are 

inherent with an industrial environment and are not unusual or extreme. 

EXAMPLE CAl CIU.ATIONS AND FIElD DATA SHEETS 

See following enclosures 

Stack Sampling and Analysis - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and Analysis 
c ... + ... ' ............. TEST, Inc. 

r

-. ..... Route 2, Box 33-8 Poca, WV 25' 59 

(304) 755-1077 (304) 755-1099 Fax 

www.wastetron.eom 

[, 

[ 

[ 

[ 

o 

o 

[ 

[ 

I 

L 

o 

l 

t 

l 

EQIIIPMENT CAT JBR ATJON 

Probe Nozzle 

Pitot Tube 

Dry Gas Meter Orifice Manometer 

Thermocouple 

Stack Sampling and AnalysiS - Mobile laboratory 

Air Toxies Sampling and AnalysiS 

Description 

By micrometer per EPA Method 5. Three 

separate measurements using different 

diameters each time, and obtain the average of 

the measurements. 

Per EPA Method 2 type pitot tube construction. 

Default 0.84 will be used. 

Per EPA Method 5 using a wet test meter. Five 

(5) point calibration before and after test. 

Per EPA Method 2 
Chrome Scrubber Stack-:-~_ 

Inside Diameter of Stack = ft. 

Port to Upstream Distance = 9 ft. 

Port to Downstream Distance = 6 ft. 

Area Of Stack = 804.2 

Port to Upstream Distance = 3.56 

Port to Downstream Distance = 2.44 

Draw' s Not to Scale 

32 m. 

6.0 in. 

6.0 in. 

sq. inches 

Stack Diameters 

Stack Diameters 

Traverse 

Points 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• • 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Percent of Inches From 

Diameter Stack Wall 

2.1 1 

6.7 2 2/16 

H.8 312/16 

17.7 511/16 

25.0 8 

35.5 11 6116 

64.5 2010116 

75.0 24 

82.3 26 5116 

88.2 28 4116 

93.3 29 14116 

97.9 31 
I 

r 

r 

r 

[ 

[ 

o 

Q 

{

o • 

_. 

L 

I 

L 

o 

[ 

l 

I 

1 

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

TOTAL CHRO:rvm 

Ibs/hr = mg 

Vmstd 

X __ l...::igr~_ X DSCFM x 

64.8 mg 

DSCFM* = Stack Flow Rate 

60 min 

Ihr 

Vrnstd* = Volume of dry gas sampled at standard 

conditions dry standard cubic feet 

* 29.92 "Hg, 68 degrees F (760 nun Hg, 20 degrees C) 

lib 

x---

7,000 gr 
· ; 

T-:::' 
rr Example Calculations 

RUn Number 

Pb = "Hg Barometric Pressure Cp = Pitot Cal 

rVw = gm Water weight gain Os = in. Stack Dirumter 

Pm = "H2O Meter pressure As = Sq in. Stack Area 

Avg dP = "H2O Differential pressure On = m NozzleDi~ 

r Avg Sqrtd P = "H2O Sqrt Diff. press. Tt = min SampleTm 

%C02 = Carbon Dioxide %CO = Carbon Monoxide 

%02 = Oxygen %N2 = Nitrogen 

[ Vm = acf (acf* Y) Dry Gas Volume 

Ps = "H2O "Hg Stack Pressure 

[ Tm = (F) (R) Meter Temperature 

Ts = (F) (R) Stack Temperature 

0 Vrnstd= 17.65 * Vm * [Pb + 1~~J = 17.65 * -[ + 13.6 ]= sft J 

Tm(R) scfm 

0 

[ Vwgas = 0.0471 * Vw = 0.0471 * = sft 3 

[' Bws= Vwgas Bws*100 = % Moist. Md= 

Vmstd + Vwgas I-Bws = MW= 

I ~ Th.CRl L Vs = 5129.4 * Cp * Ps*Mw * sqrt d P 

0 5129.4 * * ,I * * = fpm fps 

L ACFM= Vs *As * = ACFM 

144 144 

\ . 

DSCFM= ACFM * 528 * Ps * (l-Bws) * 528 * * = DSCFM 

Ts (R) * 29.92 * 29.92 

I % Iso. = 1039 * Vmstd * Ts CR.) 

(l-Bws) * Ps * Tt * Vs * (On)"2 

t. 1,039 * * = % 

* * * * 
L 

r 

r 

[ 

r" 

[ 

o 

o 

L 

L 

M 

L 

o 

I 

1 

l 

I 

I 

I 

L 

PREL1JvflNARY SETUP CALCULATIONS 

% Moisture = 

Md = 

CO2 = 

02 = 

CO = 

N2 = 

MWd = 

MW = 

AssumedRm = 

Assumed Tt = 

Assumed cf = 

Velocity Calculation 

Vs = 

= 

Nozzle Diameter 

Dn = 

= 

Meter Rate 

Calculated Rm = 

% y= 

8P = "H2O 

% '18 P = "H2O 

% Pb = "Hg 

% Cp = 

% Ts = of --- Tm = of --- (28.966) Psa = "H2O 

(0.60-0.85) cfm 

min 

(scfm * Tt) 

( ___ * ~8 P ) = ___ fps 

Rm*Ts*Y 

, 0.33 * Vs * TIn * Md 

Desired in Actual in -- --

0.33 * (Vs *~) *Tm * Md *Dn 2 

Ts *y 

= cfm cfm * Tt = cf 

Correction factor = elin = @ 

'18 P 

Rate Correction Multipliers 

= Rrn(new) = TmCnew) + 460 * Rm(old) 

Tm(old) + 460 

___ * '18 P @ __ _ 

___ * \18 P @ __ _ 

___ * \18 P @ __ _ 

___ * '18 P @ __ _ 

___ *,18P @ __ _ 

___ *,18P @ __ _ 

° PTm 

°PTm 

°PTm 

°PTm 

°PTm 

°PTm 

. . . 

OR 

oR 

"Hg 
r' . 

: r TEST, Inc. 

Sampling Data 

ICollllllOllls 

Project # Meter Box # %C02 Imp. Initial Final 

r Plant Meter Cal. (Y) %02 1 

Unit/Stack Pitot Cal. (Cp) %CO 2 

Operator Nozzle # %N2 3 

r Run # Nozzle Dia. (in.) Assumed Moist % 4 

Date Stack Dia.(in.) Final Moist. % 5 

r 

SampleTime Static Press.{"Hg.) Final Isokinetic % 6 

Minlpt Bar. Press. ("Hg) Initial Leak Rate cfm@ "Hg 

Filter # Leak Check Vol Final Leak Rate cfm@ "Hg 

[. Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Pump Stack Probe Filter Imp. Dry Gas Portl Time Meter (CF) Velocity Press. Rate Vacuum Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. 

Point ("H20) ("H20) (cfm) ("Hg.) (F) (F) (F) (F) In Out 

L 

[ 

r 

[ 

I 

I 

[ 

I 

! 

! 

l 

! 
f' 

r 

I 

NOTIFICA TION OF PERFORMANCE TEST 

(This notification is not required if you do not have to 

conduct a performance test under the regulation.) 

Applicable Rule: 40 CPR. Part 63, Subpart N--National Emission Standards for Chromiwn 

Emissions from Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium 

Anodizing Tanks 

1. Print or type the following for each plant in which chromium. electroplating and/or chromium 

anodizing operations are performed 

Owner/OperatorfTitle Huntington Plating, Inc, 

Street Address 625 Monroe Avenue 

City Huntington State_W_es_t _V_ir,lo:g_im_'a ______ _ 

Plant Name 

Zip Code _2....,;57_04 ___ _ 

Plant Phone Nwnber (304) 522-0381 ~~--------------------------------------------- Plant ContactfTitle Tom Houvouras, President 

Plant Address (if different than owner/operator's): 

Street Address Same as Above 

City State ----------- -------------------- Zip Code 

2. Complete the following table. IT additional lines are needed, make copies of this page. 

Rectifier 

Tank Capacity Description of Emissions Date of 

ID# Type of Tank Startup date (amperes) parts plated limit performance test 

1 Hard Chrome 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 10/612005 

2 Hard Chrome 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 10/612005 

3 HardCbrome 12/1611993 5000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mgIdscm 10/612005 

4 Hard Chrome 12/1611993 3000 Rods & cylinders 0.015 mg/dscm 10/612005 

Testing is required because of the addition of a new composite mesh pad scrubber system