alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                                       
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Nebraska Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### ARRANT v. STATE.

No. 26840.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1954.

*147No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The information charged the unlawful sale of whisky and a prior conviction for a like offense. Upon his plea of guilty before the court, punishment was assessed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All the proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

______________________ 

CIES BISKER, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

3M COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

FLOORGRAPHICS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

NEWS AMERICA MARKETING IN-STORE, LLC and 

NEWS AMERICA MARKETING IN-STORE 

SERVICES, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

____________________ 

2010-1386 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 08-CV-0115, Judge 

David J. Folsom. 
______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

TODD I. BLUMENFELD, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of 

Fort Worth, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With 

him on the brief was JONATHAN T. SUDER. 

DAVID B. WEAVER, Vinson & Elkins LLP, of Austin, 

Texas, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on 

the briefs were STEPHEN M. HASH, JENNIFER LIBRACH 

NALL; and HILARY L. PRESTON, of New York, New York for 

News America Marketing In-Store, LLC, et al. 

DAVID D. BAHLER, TRAVIS M. WOHLERS and SARAH R.

HOLLAND of Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, of Austin, Texas, 

on the brief for 3M Company. 

ERIC J. MAURER, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, of 

Washington, DC, on the brief for Floorgraphics, Inc. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 22, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ismael Figueroa, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered December 16, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant was discovered by a tenant of an apartment building, in what had previously been a locked and secured basement, removing items from the tenant’s storage area. The lock on the basement door had been broken off, and the defendant’s explanation to the tenant for his presence in the basement was patently unbelievable. Under the circumstances, the jury could properly infer that the defendant’s entry into the basement was unlawful *(see, People v Bates,*143 AD2d 481; *People v Bell,*131 AD2d 859; *Matter of Ray D.R.,*70 Misc 2d 184). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
### NU M BER 13- 08- 0018 8-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

M cA LL EN IND EPEN DEN T SCH OOL D ISTR ICT , A pp ellan t,
v . A NN A M . R UB IO, A pp ellee.
On ap pe al f rom Co un ty C ou rt a t L aw N o. 1 of H ida lgo C ou nty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Ro dr i guez and G ar za M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am T his ca se is before the C our t on a j oin t moti on to rev erse and remand for further cons ide ra ti on by

the tr ial co urt. The par

ti es hav e re ached an ag re ement w it h reg ard to the dispo sition of

the m atte rs currently

on ap pea l. Pursua nt to agreeme nt, th e pa rties request thi s C our

t t o rev erse, w ithout re g ard to the mer it s, the t ri al cour t’ s o rd er deny ing the appel lan t’ s p lea to the j ur is dicti on and re mand thi s cas e for further act ion by the t ri al cour t.2

W e R EVER SE t he tr ial co urt’ s o rd er deny ing appel lant’ s p lea to the j ur is dicti on w it hout re ferenc e to the mer it s, and REMA ND thi s c ase to t he tr ial co urt for further proceed ing s in acc ordance w it h the par ti es’ ag re ement. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .1(a)(2)(B), 43. 2(d). In ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the par ti es, co sts are tax ed ag ain st the p arty inc ur ri ng sa me. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 23rd day

of Oct ober , 200 8.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4589 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4589

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Orange 131.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Orange 131.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE ORANGE 131.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Reactive Orange     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          131, (CAS No.                                                     12/31/2015
                          187026-95-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00758-CV

Gordon W. BOBBITT,

Appellant

v.

SCENIC HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and Robert Statzer, President,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CV-0341

Honorable Linda Z. Jones, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 13, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with each party bearing its own costs.

However, the motion does not contain a certificate of conference or any attachment reflecting an

agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (absent

agreement of parties, costs are taxed against appellant). Accordingly, we grant the motion to
04-09-00758-CV

-2-

dismiss, but order all costs of the appeal assessed against appellant. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),

(d).

PER CURIAM
#### COMMONWEALTH v. JENNINGS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 18, 1954.

Burnis Martin, Prestonsburg, for appellant.

W. W. Burchett, Prestonsburg, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed by the Commonwealth’s Attorney of the Thirty-First Judicial District from an order of the Floyd ■Circuit Court permitting the prosecuting witness to employ special counsel, over the objections of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, to assist in the prosecution of one charged with a criminal offense.

An appeal 'by the Commonwealth in this type of proceeding is governed by sections 335 and 337 of our Criminal Code of Practice. In view of the fact that .the record affirmatively shows that the Attorney General has refused to participate in this controversy, and has also failed to take the appeal as required by section 337, Criminal Code of Practice, we are constrained to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

COMBS, J., not sitting.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/24/2015 COA No. 02-14-00048-CR

COLLINS, GILBERT JUNIOR A/K/A GILBERT JOUINOR COLLINS Tr. Ct. No.

1324831D PD-0635-15

This is to serve notice to the court of appeals that this Court granted a motion for

extension of time to file a petition for discretionary review until June 24, 2015. The

time for filing the petition for discretionary review has expired.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Louis Vucci, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

 

Dated: July 14, 2011

/s/ Louis Vucci, Jr.

Louis Vucci, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Victor Petrone, Chief Financial Officer of Diamond Ranch Foods, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: July 14, 2011

 

/s/ Victor Petrone

Victor Petrone Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 41     | 23     | 55     | 48     | 89     | 4      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2008
    /s/ Gregory W. FreibergGregory W. FreibergChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4610 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-methyl-4-methoxy-6- 

methylamino-1,3,5-triazine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. SCHOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-methyl4-methoxy-6-methylamino-1,3,5-triazine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-4-METHOXY-6-METHYLAMINO-1,3,5- 

4 TRIAZINE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.44 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-methyl-4-methoxy-6-methylamino-1,3,5-triazine) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4610 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BEST v. BEST.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 29, 1954.

Donald L. Wood, Maysville, for appellant.

J. Thaxter Sims, Cynthiana; for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Robertson Circuit Court awarding appellee a divorce and lump sum alimony in the amount of $1,000. The amount in controversy being less than $2,500, no written opinion is required unless our examination of the record indicates that the appeal should be granted and the judgment reversed. KRS 21.080.

We find that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the Chancellor’s award. Complaint is also made concerning an allowance of $250 to appellee’s attorney as his fee in this case. We do not think the allowance is excessive, but we are precluded from considering the question since ap-pellee’s attorney was not made a party by the statement of appeal.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment- is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1025
EDWARD BERNARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:04-cv-02237-PMD) Submitted: February 13, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edward Bernard Mitchell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Mitchell’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Principi , 467 F. Supp. 2d 544 (D.S.C. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED