alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Calif--Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 53     | 56    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 68     | 97     | 122    | 117    | 63     | 112    | 149    | 98     | 31     | 29    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 66     | 69     | 55     | 60     | 45     | 27     | 11     | 22     | 25     | 37    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 21     | 31     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24609]

[[Page 57843]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Management of Accelerated Technology Insertion 
II (MATI II)

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 28, 2000, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Management of Accelerated 
Technology Insertion II (MATI II) has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Baxter Healthcare 
Corporation, Deerfield, IL; DSM Desotech Inc., Elgin, IL; General 
Motors Corporation, Warren, MI; Roche Diagnosis Corporation, 
Indianapolis, IN; Rockwell Automation, Milwaukee, WI; Siemens 
Westinghouse Power Corporation, Orlando, FL; and United Technologies 
Corporation, East Hartford, CT have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Management of Accelerated Technology 
Insertion II intends to file additional written notification disclosing 
all changes in membership.
    On October 15, 1999, Management of Accelerated Technology Insertion 
II filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. 
The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2000 (65 FR 30610).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-24609 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
MEDICI VENTURES, INC. 
2017 STOCK OPTION PLAN
 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the Medici Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) 2017 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) amends the Plan as set forth below effective as of the date approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. All capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings provided to them in the Plan.


WHEREAS, Company, a Company organized under the laws of Delaware, originally adopted the Plan on July 26, 2017,
    
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may, at any time, amend the Plan,


WHEREAS, in a meeting of the Board on December 18, 2018, the Board determined that in order to attract and retain talent it is advantageous to the Company to amend the Plan to allow for additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock to be allocated under the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.     Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby canceled and replaced with the following:


(a)    Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 10, a total of 130,000 shares of the authorized shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.


2.     Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


This Amendment has been adopted by the Board as of April 16, 2019.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4633 

To extend the suspension of duty on Chloromethylbenzene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALTMIRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Chloromethylbenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.18 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Chloromethylbenzene) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2222 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of the 

Environmental Protection Agency to publish annually a list of vehicles 

that satisfy requirements for certification as a low emission and energyefficient vehicle, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2011 

Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana (for himself and Mr. MCCOTTER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to publish annually a list of vehicles that satisfy requirements 

for certification as a low emission and energy-efficient 

vehicle, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Municipal Fleet Mod5 ernization Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2222 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIST OF LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT 

2 VEHICLES. 

3 Section 166 of title 23, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub6 section (g); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(f) LIST OF LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-EFFI10 CIENT VEHICLES.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

11 of enactment of the Municipal Fleet Modernization Act of 

12 2011, and annually thereafter, the Administrator of the 

13 Environmental Protection Agency shall update and pub14 lish in the Federal Register a list of vehicles that satisfy 

15 requirements for certification as a low emission and en16 ergy-efficient vehicle.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.358

 

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS,
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 168619 dated December 26, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

local telecommunications services, except for local telecommunications 
 services via coin-box telephones and multiple-access facilities

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 26, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 14, 2018 No. 660-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF   TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40379

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

RICHARD BRENTON TOBIAS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TERRY BROWN, District Attorney,

Polk County; BILLY RAY NELSON,

Sheriff for the County of Polk,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 9:94-CV-161 

- - - - - - - - - -

August 24, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Brenton Tobias appeals the district court's

dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(d). 

The district court may dismiss a complaint filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983 if it determines that it is frivolous; i.e., if

the allegations lack an arguable basis either in law or fact. 

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). A district
No. 95-40379

-2-

court's § 1915 dismissal is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. 

Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992).

Prosecutors are immune from § 1983 suits for acts that are

within the scope of their prosecutorial duties. Imbler v.

Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 431 (1976). Prosecutorial immunity has

been extended to a prosecutor's actions in initiating,

investigating, and pursuing a criminal prosecution. McGruder v.

Necaise, 733 F.2d 1146, 1148 (5th Cir. 1984). Quasi-judicial

conduct, such as a prosecutor's decision whether to file criminal

charges, is also immune. Oliver v. Collins, 904 F.2d 278, 281

(5th Cir. 1990).

A sheriff is entitled to the protection of qualified

immunity "if a reasonably competent law enforcement agent would

not have known that his actions violated clearly established

law." See King v. Chide, 974 F.2d 653, 657 (5th Cir. 1992).

The first step in the analysis of a qualified immunity

defense is to determine whether the plaintiff has stated a

constitutional violation. Id. In a § 1983 suit, the foundation

of that first step is the principle that liability must arise out

of a violation of a constitutionally protected right, not merely

out of tort law. Id. Tobias does not possess a constitutional

right to have an individual criminally prosecuted. See Oliver v.

Collins, 914 F.2d 56, 60 (5th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, Tobias's complaint lacked a basis in law, and

the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing it

as frivolous. The district court's warning that additional

frivolous suits could result in sanctions applies as well to the
No. 95-40379

-3-

filing of frivolous appeals. See e.g., Coghlan v. Starkey, 852

F.2d 806, 811 (5th Cir. 1988); Clark v. Green, 814 F.2d 221, 223

(5th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6877-1]


Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; call for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of 
Research and Development, of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) is undertaking to update and revise, where appropriate, the Air 
Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (EPA-600/
P-93-004aF-cF) published in July 1996.
    Since completion of the 1996 ozone criteria document, the EPA has 
continued to collect scientific information on the effects of ground-
level ozone on health and vegetation. A summary and evaluation of this 
and other selected literature that may be particularly relevant to a 
review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone will be 
presented in the forthcoming revised criteria document.
    As part of this continuing review, interested parties are invited 
to assist the EPA in developing and refining the scientific information 
base for updating the air quality criteria for ozone. While EPA has 
continued to follow the literature and gather appropriate studies since 
early 1996, the Agency is interested in additional new information, 
particularly concerning the effects expected from the presence of 
ground-level ozone in the ambient air on: humans and laboratory 
animals; vegetation, both in agroecosystems (crops) and in natural 
ecosystems; nonbiological materials; and global climate. EPA also seeks 
recent information in other areas of ozone research such as its 
chemistry and physics, sources and emissions, analytical methodology, 
transport and transformation in the environment, and ambient 
concentrations. To be considered for inclusion in the revised criteria 
document, submitted information should be published, accepted for 
publication, or have been presented at a public scientific meeting.

DATES: All communications and information must be submitted by December 
1, 2000, and addressed to the Project Manager for Ozone and Related 
Photochemical Oxidants, National Center for Environmental Assessment 
(MD-52), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27711.

    Dated: September 15, 2000.
William H. Farland,
Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 00-24676 Filed 9-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIS CARLOS RAMOS,

 Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00291-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01868)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4652 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable infrared gas grill and 

cooler combinations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain portable infrared 

gas grill and cooler combinations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORTABLE INFRARED GAS GRILL 

4 AND COOLER COMBINATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4652 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Portable infrared gas grill 

and cooler combinations 

with 290 sq. in. of grilling 

surface and two 30-quart 

soft-sided coolers (provided 

for in subheading 

7321.11.10) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Connecticut Department of 

ENERGY & 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTIO N 

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 

Mr. David Michaels 

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 

5 Research Parkway 

Wallingford, CT 06492 

RE: Revocation of Permit No. 189-0207-TV for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 5 Research Parkway, 

Wallingford, CT 

Dear Mr. Michaels: 

Pursuant to Section 22a-174-2a(h) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA) the 

Commissioner of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (Department) may revoke any 

permit at the request of the Permittee in accordance with Sections 4-182(c) and 22a-174c of the 

Connecticut General Statutes, RCSA Section 22a-3a-5(d), and any other applicable law. Any such 

request shall be in writing and contain facts and reasons supporting the request, the requested date of 

revocation and provide evidence satisfactory to the Commissioner that the subject source is no longer a 

Title V source. 

As requested and supported in the License Revocation Request Form (Application No. 201206753), 

received by the Department on November 5, 2012, the Bureau of Air Management Permit Number 189-

0207-TV for the premises at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, CT is 

hereby revoked. The revocation is effective on the date of this notice in view of the fact that BristolMyers Squibb Company has specifically waived the right to a hearing. 

This letter in no way grants immunity from legal action resulting from the failure of this source to remain 

in compliance with existing air pollution regulations, nor does it provide an exemption from compliance 

with future Federal, State or local laws. 

If you have any questions concerning this notice, please feel free to contact Mr. Louis Corsino of my staff 

at 860-424-4152. 

GSR: ljc 

cc: Mark Hultman, TRC 

Donald Dahl, EPA New England 

Christopher Mulcahy, Air Engineering 

Robert Girard, Air Enforcement 

Date 

Director ^ 

Engineering & Enforcement Division 

Certified Mail
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09376

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09376\09376_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09376\09376_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09376\09376_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09376\09376_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09376\09376_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09376\09376_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09376\Certification Statement Plant ID 09376.pdf Plant certification statement

09376\Supplemental Documents\09376_BWGPMap1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09376\Supplemental Documents\09376_BWGPWaterbalance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### RUSSELL et al. v. OLD PLANING MILL CO. et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 23, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1954.

Terry L. Hatchett, Glasgow, for appellants.

Richardson & Barrickman, Wilson & Wilson and J. Wood Vance, Jr., Glasgow, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The filing of the record herein is regarded as a motion for an appeal, KRS 21.080 and RCA 1.180, from a judgment of the Barren Circuit Court, Honorable Frank W. Jones, Judge, awarding mechanics liens on certain property in various sums to several creditors of a building contractor.

The aggregate of the liens to the five ap-pellees is $4,753.37. The largest is $2,414.41 in favor of The Old Planing Mill Company and the smallest is $152.82 in favor of Paul D. Drake, but each judgment is subject to a reduction of about 16% conceded by the appellant to be due by paying $749 into court.

The amounts of these several liens may not be combined to confer jurisdiction on this court. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 285 Ky. 249, 147 S.W.2d 382. This rule applies where the defendant in the several actions appeals although he is required to pay the aggregate amount. Mullins v. Cook, 207 Ky. 282, 269 S.W. 338; Canada v. Coleman, 208 Ky. 248, 270 S.W. 756. No one of the judgments is for as much as $2,-500. The 1952 amendment to KRS 21.060 *372eliminated the unqualified right to appeal a judgment enforcing a statutory lien.

The appeal from the judgment in favor of Paul D. Drake is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ashland Grocery Co. v. Martin, 267 Ky. 677, 103 S.W.2d 72.

We have considered the other cases and conclude that each judgment should be reduced by *2%.*

Motions for appeals in those cases are overruled and the judgments stand affirmed subject to being modified in the circuit court by the reduction stated.

One half the costs of appeal will be taxed against the appellant and one half against the four appellees.