P. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1790 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 235 ) ll-F-2 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 12:43:17

PM Sheet 235of 250P. 2

.09/15/9 5 FR

I 16:4 0 FA

X 01/0 6 "O Q 17:2 3 ID:SPF-30 1 Sei-ie s FPX : 

### Departmen t o f Energ y Washington . D C 2058 5 @00 2 PAG E 

### A-90-3 7

FA X COVE RSHEET OFFICE O

F ENVIRONMENTA

L ANALYSI

S & SUSTAINABL

E DEVELOPMEN

T OFFIC E O F POLIC Y DEPARTMEN

T O F ENERG

Y 100 0 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE , S W WASHINGTON

, D.C . 2058 5 TE L (202J-586-206 1 FA X (202 ) 586-206 2
DATE , NUMBE RO F PAGES (INCLUDIN

G COVER

) T O 

### CLUDIN

G COVER

)

PHON E NUMBER:_

_ FA X NUMBER : . FROM: NtJM

B 

### Sf e M®WKS$

PHON E NUMBER : FA X NUMBER : MESSAGE : > ; I

. 

### 3 0199 0 it ! JJ 

### AB^^AZJJt^MI^J.09'15/9 5 FR I 16:4 1 FA

X 0MJ 6 '0 0 17:2 3 ID:SPF-30 1 Secie s FAX: . PAG E 2 P. 3 I S 00 3

MEMORANDU

M FOR: Bil l Tyndall, EP A ArtFrtas , OM

B x , .FROM : I^ogerMorris.DOE Q/W\ iS~Sl~$C SUBJECT : New Sourc e Review Refor

m Issues \ ... . .. . Th e teleconferenc e o f

3/30/.9 5 betwee nDOE , BPA . OM B an d NP S lef tthre e issue s outstandin gan d resolve d one . Th e resolve d issu e i s th e DO E reques tthat"reasonabl e progress " appea ri nth e paragrap h o n pag e 25 8 wher e th e nationa l visibilit y goa l i s described . Ou reoenio n wa s calle d t o th e followin gparagrap h wher e reasonabl e progres s j f mentioned . Whil e w e woul d prefe rtha t har e relate d measure s b e describe d a s "reasonabl e progres s towar d th e visibilit y goa l o f — \ i ti s acceptabl e tha ttb e tw o concept s (goa l an d progres s toward ) ar e presente d i nclos e proximity . l h e firstunresolve d issu e i s th e us e o f rh e fen n"deference" , o npage s 30 0 an d 315 , i s a prescriptio nfo rth e permi tauthority' s attitud e towar d o nFLM's s demonstratio nma ta n AQR V woul d b e adversel y affecte d b y emission s from apropose d source , despit e n o * incremen to rNAAQ S violation . DQ E ha s recornmende d "careful consideration" . Give n th e fac tthatDQ E an d NP S ar e diametricall y oppose d o nthi s point . BP A an d OM B mus tresolv e th e issue . Tn e lecon d unresolve d issu e i s th e ibsenc e fro m th e preambl e o f discussio no f

th e pbrts e "in whol e o ri n pan " i n th e propose d regulations . (Pi n 5 1 • (41 ) an d par t5 2 9 (42)) . Th e discussio ndurin gth e teleconferenc e indicate d 1 ) tha tDOB , NP S an d BP A agree d tha tthi s i s a nimportan tissue , an d 2 ) th e issu e i s currentl y unresolved . DO B requeste d (an d EP A appeare d t o agree ) tha tsom e discussio no f "i n whol e o ri npart " shoul d appea ri nth e preamble . DO B als o state d tha tsuc h discussio ncoul d frtnkly affirm th e unresolve d natur e o f th e issue , provide d tha tpotentia l commenter s ar e alerte d t o th e existenc e o f th e issue . DO B recommend s tha trelevan tportion * o f th e Clover , V A an d Kingsport , TN , case s b e quote d i n th e discussio no f

thi s issue . Th e thir d unresolve d issu e concern s infeasihilit y criteri ai nLAE Rselection s whe nNS Ri s triggere d b y reconstructio n o rmodification . EP A suggeste d afootnot e followin gth e first . sentenc e unde rste p 2 o npag e 169 . DO B suggest s th e followin gfootnote : . "In th e cas e o f

LAE Rdeterminations , di e infeaaibilit y o f th e moa teffectiv e emissio n limitatio nachieve d i n rrtictic e b y asourc e i nth e clas s o rcatcg« y o f th e applicant' s will , generally , b e difficul tt o demonstrat e becaus e th e achievemen to f suc h limitatio n i s prim afaci e evidenc e o f

it' s feasibility . However , Whe nLAE Rmus tb e detennine d fo rareconstructiono rmodification , sit e sr*ci & facto nma y b e relevan tt o a n infeasibilit y demonstration. "P. 4 $00 4 09/15/9 5 FR

I 16:4 1 FA

X 01^0 6 '0 0 17:2 4 ID:SPF-30 1 Secie s FAX : PAG E 3

Th e precedin g languag e ma y b e altere d b y BP A provide d it s inten ti s preserved . DO B di d no t inten d matEPA resolv e th e issu e a tmi s stag e o f developmen to f

th e NS Rreform proposal , butonl y t o solici tcommen to n th e issue . However , w e woul d conside rth e issu e close d i f th e footnot e propose d abov e wa s inserted . DO E understand s thatarevised versio n o f th e NS Rrefor

m proposal wil l b e circulate d fo r interagenc y revie wj th e nea rfuture . W e wil l revie wtha trevisio n with attentio n t o th e unresolve d issue s describe d abov e and th e issue s raise d b y Loris aDobriansky . Thi s i s m y la tactio n o n behal f o f DOB , a s I retire today ! It' s bee n apleasur e workin g with al l o f you . Kee p u p th e goo d work . cc : Bo b Raine y Loris aDobriask y Bet h Campbel l Dou g Carte r