alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 -i CHAPTER 11. LIFE

- CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11-1 11.2 GENERAL APPROACH

................................ ................................ .................................. 11-111 -1 CHAPTER 11. LIFE

- CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The life -cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups or customers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy efficiency standard level. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses for the notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the LCC and payback periods (PBPs) for those customers who fall into identifiable affected groups. DOE plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices and variations in energy use that might affect the net present value of a standard to customer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will obtain estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability in its calculation of customer impacts. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to consider how differences in energy use w ill affect subgroups of customers.

DOE will determine the impact on customer subgroups using the LCC spreadsheet model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC and PBP analysis (described in the preliminary t echnical support document (TSD) chapter 8) focuses on all business and institution al us ers of automatic commercial ice mak ers. DOE can use the LCC spreadsheet model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. Model inputs used by DOE to determine LCC and PBPs are described in detail in the LCC and PBP analysis (see preliminary TSD chapter 8).

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH

DOE will use the LCC spreadsheet model to evaluate impacts on consumer subgroups, especially small business customers

. DOE can analyze the LCC for any subgroup by applying the LCC spreadsheet model to only that subgroup within individual regions . DOE is particularly sensitive to increases in the consumer price of the considered products, wishing to avoid a negative economic impact on any identified consumer subgroup with limited capacity to absorb price increases

. Th e impacts on subgroups will be compared to impacts on the overall population.
#### CARTER v. STATE.

No. 23305.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 13, 1946.

Oak McKenzie, of Bryan, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol, punishment being a fine of $100.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
December 21 , 201 1

Ms. Lisa Jackson
U.S. Environmental Prot ection Agency
Ben Franklin Post Office
P.O. Box 862 Washington, DC 2004 4 Attn: Chemical Right

- to

- Know Program

Subject: Submission of documents for Trichlorinated ketone (CAS No. 145556

- 04

- 3 ) under

the EHPV Challenge Progra m, via electronic submission to EHPV

- Program

Submissions@epa.gov Exponent Project No. 1006827.000

Dear Administrator Jackson :

On beha lf of BASF Corporation, we are submitting the attached revised test plan and revised
robust summaries for T richlorinated ketone (CAS No. 145556

- 04

- 3 ).

The submission, made under the U.S. EPA’s Extended High Production Volume Chemical Challenge Progra m, consists of a revised test plan and revised robust summaries for
Trichlorinated ketone and an analog, Dichloropinacolin (CAS No. 22591

- 21

- 5 ). Use and exposure information is contained in the test plan as well as the robust summaries. This revision updates our original submission of May 1, 2008

.

The documents are being submitted in electronic format (Adobe Acrobat pdf files). In addition, we have completed entry of the robust summaries into HPVIS.

If you have difficu lty with the electronic submission or require additional information, please contact me, as BASF’s representative, by phone (919

- 228

- 6480) or e

- mail ( jstaveley@exponent.com ).

1006827.000Ms. Lisa Jackson

December 21 , 2011

Sincerely,

Jane P. Staveley, M.S.P.H. Senior Managing Scientist

Enclosures ( 2 ) :

 Revised test plan for Trichlorinated ketone (pdf)

 Robust summaries for Trichlorinated ketone and Dichloropinacolin

cc: Dr. Ralph Parod, BASF Co rporation Dr. David Cortes, BASF Corporation Ms. Christina Franz, American Chemistry Council
Exhibit 99.4

[KPMG Logo]

                         KPMG LLP
                         Suite 2300
                         Three Wachovia Center
                         401 South Tryon Street
                         Charlotte, NC 28202-1911

                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
HomEq Servicing Corporation

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion, that HomEq Servicing Corporation (the Company) complied
with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                 /s/ KPMG LLP

February 24, 2006


          KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
            member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.



<PAGE>


HOMEQ SERVICING




                             MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION
                             ----------------------

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, HomEq Servicing Corporation (the
"Company") complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy both
in the amount of $20 million.

HomEq Servicing Corporation


/s/ Arthur Q. Lyon                               February 24, 2006
----------------------------                     -----------------
Arthur Q. Lyon                                   Date
President


/s/ Keith G. Becher                              February 24, 2006
----------------------------                     -----------------
Keith G. Becher                                  Date
Chief Operating Officer



                                                                 [LOGO WACHOVIA]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 185 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently reduce 

individual income tax rates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

reduce individual income tax rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Tax Relief 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. 2003 TAX REDUCTIONS MADE PERMANENT. 

7 Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Rec8 onciliation Act of 2003 is hereby repealed. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 185 IH

1 SEC. 3. FIVE-PERCENT REDUCTION IN INDIVIDUAL INCOME 

2 TAX RATES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Internal Revenue 

4 Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(j) RATE REDUCTIONS AFTER 2010.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of taxable years 

8 beginning in a calendar year after 2010, the reduced 

9 percentage specified in the following table shall be 

10 substituted for the otherwise applicable tax rate in 

11 the tables under subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), and 

12 (e). 

‘‘Otherwise applicable tax rate Reduced percentage 

10 ........................................................................... 9.5 

15 ........................................................................... 14.25 

25 ........................................................................... 23.75 

28 ........................................................................... 26.6 

33 ........................................................................... 31.35 

35 ........................................................................... 33.25 

13 ‘‘(2) ADJUSTMENT OF TABLES.—The Secretary 

14 shall adjust the tables prescribed under subsection 

15 (f) to carry out this subsection.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this subsection shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2010. 

19 (c) REPEAL OF EGTRRA SUNSET OF RATE REDUC20 TIONS.—Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 185 IH

1 Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the amend2 ments made by section 101 of such Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 169   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 135    | 111    | 153    | 203    | 255    | 198    | 426    | 330    | 161    | 109   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 160    | 144    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHONEY'S, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 16,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-16-1997
<CASH>                                       9,930,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,348,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,555,955
<INVENTORY>                                 48,734,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           167,279,586
<PP&E>                                     804,651,168
<DEPRECIATION>                             312,857,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             726,521,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      228,263,118
<BONDS>                                    458,485,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    48,551,609
<OTHER-SE>                                 (61,246,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               726,521,045
<SALES>                                    356,743,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           363,290,333
<CGS>                                      328,274,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              384,907,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            42,647,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,984,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (21,616,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (7,847,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (13,769,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13,769,723)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Processed in Alabama (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Processed in Alabama (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | -------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |        | 117,738 | 96,587 | 95,078 | 116,683 | 155,839 | 116,254 | 92,238 | 104,079
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 111,323 | 97,880 | 108,945 |        |        |         |         |         |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In the Matter of Thomas Ruskin, Appellant, v Benjamin Ward, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered January 27, 1989, dismissing petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, a police officer since 1982, passed an examination for promotion to police sergeant. After interviewing the petitioner and considering his personnel and medical records, the Police Department Personnel Review Board voted unanimously not to promote petitioner to the rank of sergeant.

It is well established that the appointing officer of a city agency has broad discretion to select individuals for civil service appointment and promotion *(Matter of Cassidy v Municipal Civ. Serv. Commn.,*37 NY2d 526). The courts will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion unless there is evidence of arbitrary or unlawful conduct by the appointing officer *(Matter of Delicati v Schechter,*3 AD2d 19), a showing not made on this record. Although not required to do so *(Matter of Chikofsky v Thompson,*22 AD2d 782), the respondents have demonstrated that certain aspects of the petitioner’s personnel record (e.g., excessive sick leave and civilian complaints of excessive force) provided a rationale basis for the Police Commissioner’s determination not to promote petitioner to the rank of sergeant *(Matter of Schmitt v Kiley,*124 AD2d 661, *lv denied*69 NY2d 612). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4669 

To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on +-cyfluthrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary reduction of duty on 

+-cyfluthrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. +-CYFLUTHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.64 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 +-cyfluthrin) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘4.8%’’ and inserting ‘‘2.1%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4669 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4586 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4586

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial staple fibers of viscose 
     rayon, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial staple fibers of viscose 
     rayon, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON, NOT CARDED, 
              COMBED OR OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Artificial staple   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fibers of viscose                                                 12/31/2015
                          rayon, not
                          carded, combed or
                          otherwise
                          processed for
                          spinning,
                          measuring greater
                          than 1.3 decitex
                          to 1.66 decitex
                          and having a
                          fiber length each
                          measuring 20 mm
                          or more but not
                          over 150 mm
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5504.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```