alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Revolutionary Concepts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Garry Stevenson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Garry
      StevensonGarry
    StevensonChief Financial
      OfficerApril 14,
    2009
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS BO YS & GI RL S CL UB S OF EL PAS O/ SAN DR

A C I SNE RO S, Appellant/Cross-Appe llee,
v. S A N D RA C IS N E R O S / B O Y S & G IR LS CL UB S OF EL

PASO, Ap pe lle e /Cr os s- Ap pe lla nt. § § § § § § No. 08-07-00338- CV

Appea l from the 34 6th Di str ic t Co ur

t of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC#2006-644)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pending be fore the Court is a joint mot ion to se t a side the trial court’ s judgme nt and re mand for e ntry of an a g ree d judgme nt pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 42
. 1 (a )(2)(B ). The motion is g rante d. We the re fo re se t a sid e the tr ia l c ourt ’s jud g me nt wi tho ut re g a rd to the me ri ts a nd re mand the c a us e to th e t rial cour

t for re ndition of judgment in ac corda nce w ith the parties’ a g ree ment. We further order costs be asse ssed ag ainst the party incurringsame.

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice J anuar y 8, 2009 B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 3 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk May 3 , 2019

15 9371 ( 52 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 159371

v COA: 3 41627

Ingham CC: 17

- 000407

- FH

GERALD MAGNANT

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

_________ ______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing i t s answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before May 21 , 2019

.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-1141V Filed: October 30, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

CHRISTINA JELIC,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, C onway, Homer, P.C., Bost on, MA, for petitioner. Robert Paul Coleman, III, U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On September 14, 2016, Christina Je lic (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Inju ry Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner al leges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury as a result of an influenz a vaccine she received on October 28, 2013. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 30, 2017, a ru ling on entitlement was i ssued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On Oc tober 30, 2017, respondent filed a combined Rule 4 report/proffer on award of compensat ion (“Rule 4/Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $111,713.14. Rule 4/Proffer at 4. In th e Rule 4/Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule

4/Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stat ed in the Rule 4/Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $111,713. 14 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Christina Jelic. This amount represents compens ation for all damages that

would be available un der § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment c an be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DOMINO’S PIZZA, INC. 

EMPLOYEE STOCK PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN DATED DECEMBER 31, 2013 

Effective as of January 1, 2019 

WHEREAS, Domino’s Pizza, Inc. (the “Company”) previously adopted the Amended and Restated Domino’s Pizza, Inc.
Employee Stock Payroll Deduction Plan dated December 31, 2013 (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, Section 20 of the
Plan allows the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to amend the Plan at any time and without notice; and 

WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the Plan to remove the deemed termination of a Participant’s payroll deduction authorization as
of the date a Participant takes hardship distribution from the Domino’s Pizza 401(k) Savings Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan
is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2019, as follows: 
 1. Section 9 of the Plan is hereby replaced and amended with the
following: 
 “A Participant who holds an Option under the Plan may at any time prior to exercise thereof cancel all (but not less
than all) of his or her remaining Option or terminate his or her participation in the Plan in the form and manner specified by the Company and with such prior notice as the Company may require. Upon such cancellation or termination, the balance in
the Participant’s withholding account will be retained in the Participant’s account and applied to the deemed exercise of the Option at the end of the Exercise Period. 

No Participant or Employee who has made a hardship withdrawal from the Domino’s Pizza 401(k) Savings Plan will be deemed as a result of
such withdrawal to terminate his or her payroll deduction authorization under the Plan or to revoke participation in the Plan for Option Periods beginning on and after January 1, 2019.” 

2. Any capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 

3. Except as provided herein, no other changes are being made to the Plan. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by its authorized officer and attested all on this 23rd
day of April, 2019. 
  

					
	DOMINO’S PIZZA, INC.
	
	By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Lawrence
	Name: Jeffrey D. Lawrence
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial     Officer
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36,198 | 66,713 | 74,661 | 52,543
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37,248 | 62,443 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 10.12 (f)
 AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO THE
VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC RETIREMENT PLAN
 (As Amended and Restated Effective June 1, 2005)
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Effective September 15, 2009, a new Section 3.6 is hereby added to the Plan to read in its
entirety as follows:
 Special Early Retirement Provision
 Background
 Eligible Participants




---



##### 



Special Early Retirement Provision
  x y
 No Duplication
 No Application to Other Participants
 2. Effective with respect to Annuity Starting Dates occurring on or after January 1, 2008, Section.
5. 1(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:
 Joint and Survivor Annuity
   - 2 -




---



##### 



3. Effective with respect to Annuity Starting Dates occurring on or after October 1, 2009, the
first four sentences of Section 5. 2(a) are amended to read as follows:
   4. Effective with respect to Annuity Starting Dates occurring on or after October 1, 2009, each
occurrence of the phrase Joint and Survivor Annuity in Section 5.5 shall be replaced with the
phrase 50% Joint and Survivor Annuity.
 5. Effective with respect to Annuity Starting Dates occurring on or after October 1, 2009, the last
sentence of Section 6. 1(a) is amended to read as follows:
   - 3 -




---



##### 



6. Effective with respect to Annuity Starting Dates occurring on or after October 1, 2009, the
penultimate sentence of Sections 6. 1(b) and 6. 1(c) is amended to read as follows:
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, th
 Attest:
    
    VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC/s/ Laureen Quinter
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Scott G. Smith
  - 4 -
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-010-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                     
|No chart available.                                                     
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|New York Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, J. Stephen Vanderwoude, as Managing Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. Stephen Vanderwoude
----------------------------------------

Name:   J. Stephen Vanderwoude
Title:  Managing Director, Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 4, 2005




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 7, 2006 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge No. 04-2406 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. FEMI JOHNSON. Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 01 CR 103 Matthew F. Kennelly, Judge

. O R D E R On Paladinoremand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same guidelines sentence that he imposed origi nally had he known that the guidelines were merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the defendant's arguments for a lower standar d in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). AFFIRMED. 

### UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 97 to Registration Statement Amendment No. 2-25980
on Form N-1A of our report dated February 22, 2017, relating to
the financial statements and financial highlights of Pioneer Fund
(the "Fund"), appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of the
Fund for the year ended December 31, 2016. We also consent to the
references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the
Prospectus and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm"
and "Financial Statements" in the Statement of Additional
Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
April 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6222

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME WALDEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CR-95-63, CA-03-77-3)

Submitted: April 8, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Walden, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion

solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will

not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and

(2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude Walden has not made

the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. ,

123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SONOMA
INTERNATIONAL'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN SONOMA INTERNATIONAL'S FORM 10-QSB AS FILED WITH 
THE COMMISSION ON MAY 15, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,745
<PP&E>                                      18,714,079
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,713,223)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,154,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,597,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   (612,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,154,679
<SALES>                                        894,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               894,117
<CGS>                                          409,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               489,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             327,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (332,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (332,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (332,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>