alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1502V

Filed: March 16, 2016

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DORIS LEVITZKI, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza Vaccination;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (“SIRVA”);

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Danielle A. Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA (DC), for petitioner.

Debra A. Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On December 11, 2015, Doris Levitzki (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2

[the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she 

suffered left shoulder pain “causally related to an adverse reaction” after receiving an

influenza vaccination on September 17, 2015. Petition at ¶¶ 3-4, 10. Petitioner further 

alleges that she has suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, 

and neither she nor anyone else has received compensation or has filed a civil action 

for his injury alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 11, 13-14. The case was assigned to 

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 15, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

at 1. Specifically, respondent “believes that the alleged injury is consistent SIRVA that 

was caused by the administration of petitioner’s flu vaccination.” Id. at 3. Respondent

agrees that “petitioner met the statutory requirements by suffering the condition for more 

than six months . . . [and] has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under 

the Vaccine Act.” Id. (citations omitted).

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 3      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 179    | 464    | 1,123  | 1,072 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 682    | 1,389  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 16, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Edward J. WhalenEdward J. WhalenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: March 16, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Christopher L. NagelChristopher L. NagelVice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 189 (Thursday, September 28, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 58258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24759]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018-AG14


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of 
Comment Period and Notice of Availability of Draft Economic Analysis on 
Proposed Critical Habitat Designation for the Great Lakes Breeding 
Population of the Piping Plover

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule, reopening of comment period and notice of 
availability of draft economic analysis; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the closing date of the comment period 
listed in a document published in the Federal Register on September 19, 
2000, regarding the reopening of the comment period and notice of 
availability of draft economic analysis for proposed critical habitat 
designation for the Great Lakes breeding population of the piping 
plover. This clarification provides the correct date for the closing of 
the comment period on the proposed critical habitat designation for the 
Great Lakes breeding population of the piping plover and the draft 
economic analysis for the proposed critical habitat designation.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 20, 2000.

For Further Information Contact:  Laura Ragan @ (612) 713-5157.

Correction

    In the document announcing the reopening of the comment period and 
notice of availability of draft economic analysis for proposed critical 
habitat designation for the Great Lakes breeding population of the 
piping plover, 65 FR 56530 in the issue of September 19, 2000, make the 
following correction in the DATES section. On page 56530 in the 3rd 
column, correct the date by when comments must be received from 
``October 19, 2000'' to ``November 20, 2000.''

    Dated: September 21, 2000.
T.J. Miller,
Acting, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, 
Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 00-24759 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Rotorcraft Industry Technology Association, 
Inc. (``RITA'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 8, 2000, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Rotorcraft Industry Technology 
Association, Inc. (``RITA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Lord Corporation, 
Cary, NC has been added as a party to this venture. Also, The 
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL and The University of 
Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and RITA intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 28, 1995, RITA filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on April 3, 1996 (61 FR 14817).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 24, 
1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 11, 2000 (65 FR 42726).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-24606 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|West Virginia Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|West Virginia Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 3      | 3     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | W      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 8      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Texas--RRC District 7C Shale Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | -1     | 1      | -1     | 231    | -43    | 3,314  | 166    | -613   | 239   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -120   | 1,286  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ RES DEVELOPMENT CORP ORATION , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. MOMEN TIVE PERFORMANCE MAT ERIALS, INC ., Defendant

- Appellee

.

__________________________ 2013

- 1008

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 09

- CV

- 0491, Judge Timothy J. Corrigan

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ Be fore D YK , P ROST and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges

. P ROST , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. RES Development Corporation appeals from the di strict court’s grant of summary judgment th at the patent Case: 13-1008 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2013R ES DEVELOPMENT CORPO RATION v. MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIAL 2
in suit was invalid

. The parties state that they have now settled the case and requested an indicative ruling from the district court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1, whet her the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were r emanded. The district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion

. Upon consideration thereof, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is grante d. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings as may be a pp ropriate

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs

. F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s 26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 18, 2013 Case: 13-1008 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 07/18/2013
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company and general partner of TransMontaigne Partners L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  | /s/RANDALL J. LARSONRandall J. Larson Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting OfficerSeptember 13, 2005
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF V.M., A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00228

- CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2017DCM7083 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, O.M., has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal of the order terminating his

parental rights to V.M., representing that he no longer wants to continue with the appeal

. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1). The trial court also terminated the parental rights of the child’s mother,

V.M., but she has not appealed. Although the case has been submitted, an opinion has not issued.

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismis s the appeal.

April 18, 2019 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### Benedict J. Giambrone et al., Respondents, v Donald Owens et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted dismissing the fifth and sixth causes of action in the complaint. Memorandum: *842Supreme Court should have granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ fifth cause of action. Plaintiffs’ complaint did not allege sufficient factual assertions from which the conclusion could be drawn that defendants had a present intent not to carry out the promises of future action, and thus it failed to state a cause of action based on future intention *(see, Lanzi v Brooks,*54 AD2d 1057, *affd*43 NY2d 778). Moreover, plaintiffs may not turn this breach of contract cause of action into one for fraud merely by alleging that defendants, at the time the promise was made, did not intend to perform the contract *(see, Spellman v Columbia Manicure Mfg. Co.,*111 AD2d 320).

Supreme Court erred in not dismissing plaintiffs’ sixth cause of action. Plaintiffs alleged that, after closing, defendant Owens represented to them that he constructed the basement floor, foundation, and drainage system with eight inches of crushed stone and drain tile, but that upon subsequent inspection by plaintiffs, the representations were proven to be false. Plaintiffs have failed to allege or establish that, at the time the basement was constructed, defendants made any representations that plaintiffs relied upon regarding the amount of materials placed in the basement foundation. Thus, the complaint fails to allege that defendant Owens falsely stated his future intentions *(see, Lanzi v Brooks, supra).*(Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J.—dismiss causes of action.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.