alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 10 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Texas - RRC District 10 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 54     | 51     | 80     | 81     | 109    | 119    | 82     | 51     | 57     | 88    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 92     | 29     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### O’CON v. HIGHTOWER.

No. 12682.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 28, 1954.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1954.

*322Harrison & Smallwood, San Antonio, for appellant.

Joseph Kidwell, Jr., San Antonio, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

Appellant, O’Con, has appealed from a default judgment in favor of appellee, Hightower, which cancelled a promissory note given by Hightower to appellant in part consideration for a sale of the fixtures, equipment, merchandise, and place of business known as “O’Con’s Shamrock Ice Station Number Two.”

Hightower bought the place of business by paying $2,000 in cash and delivering her promissory note in the principal amount of $3,000, secured by a chattel mortgage on the fixtures, merchandise and equipment. Hightower asserted in her petition that the sale was induced by fraudulent representations with reference to debts and liens covering the fixtures, merchandise and business, and that the debts and liens were substantially equal to or in excess of the note. The petition asserted grounds for relief either by way of damages or rescission. O’Con failed to answer and the trial court heard evidence and granted a default judgment.

The judgment stated that O’Con fraudulently induced the sale, and adjudged the $3,000 note null and void. It further enjoined O’Con from negotiating or transferring the note. The rest of the trade was undisturbed. Appellant, O’Con, timely filed a motion for new trial and urged that the pleadings would support a judgment either for damages against him or a judgment for total rescission, hut that an election between the two remedies should have been made, and that part of the trade could not be rescinded without rescinding the remainder of it also.

The general rule is, as appellant contends, that a defrauded purchaser is put to an election whether he will keep the property and recover damages or rescind the sale and return the property, and recover the value he has parted with. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co., 113 Tex. 441, 251 S.W. 1034, 258 S.W. 462, 51 A.L.R. 1; 258 S.W.2d 957; 12 Am.Jur., Contracts, § 146; 46 Am.Jur., Sales, § 786. Generally a rescission “must be in toto.” 17 C.J.S., Contracts, § 416. But in circumstances which have been described as “extreme”, partial rescission has been granted of an entire contract. 9 C.J., Cancellation of Instruments, § 208; 12 C.J.S., Cancellation of Instruments, § 78b; 7 Tex.Jur., Cancellation of Instruments, § 78. Texas, in some instances, has followed that rule. Hill v. Ellsworth, Tex.Com.App., 35 S.W.2d 704; Thompson v. Williams, Tex.Civ.App., 246 S.W.2d 506; Chambers v. Wyatt, Tex.Civ.App., 151 S.W. 864.

The pleadings assert that appellee, Hightower, has changed her position by entering into a lease agreement with a third party, and by the sale and substitution of some of the items involved in the original sale. Absent a statement of facts, we are unable to say that the trial court had no facts upon which to rest its judgment for cancellation of the $3,000 note.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4560 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4560

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbosulfan technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbosulfan technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBOSULFAN TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2,3-dihydro-2,2-    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          dimethyl-7-                                                       12/31/2015
                          benzofuranyl
                          methylcarbamate
                          (Carbosulfan
                          technical) (CAS
                          No. 55285-14-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2932.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AR C OS ANTONIO AGUILAR R ODR IGUEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-73020 Age n c y No. A200-289-337 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. M arc os Antonio Aguila

r-R odrigue z , a

native and c itiz e n of El Sa lva d or, pe titions pro se

for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a

ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for withholding of re m ova l an d

re lie f unde r the C o nve ntion Aga inst



# FIL ED MAY29 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Torture (“ C AT” ). W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e fa c tua l findings, a n d re vie w de novo que stions of la

w. Ze haty e v . Gonzale

s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny

in pa rt a nd gra nt in pa rt, the pe tition for re vie w a nd we re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use Aguila r-R odrigue z fa ile d

to show it is m

o re like ly tha n not hewill betorture d with the c onse nt or a c quie sc e n c e of the Sa lva dora n gove rnm e nt. Se e Santos-Le mus v . Muk ase y , 542 F.3d 738, 747-48 (9th C ir. 2008). The a ge n c y

de te rm i ne d Aguila

r-R odrigue z ha d not m e t the ne xus re quire m e nt for withholding of re m ova l. W

h e n the IJ a

nd B IA issue d the i r de c isions they did not ha

ve the be ne fit of e ithe r this c ourt’ s de c i sions in He nrique z-Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ), and C

ordoba v . Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte rof M-EV-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a nd Matte r of W

-G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, we grant the pe tition a s to Aguila r-R o drigue z ’ s withholding of re m ova l c la im , a

nd re m and to de te rm i ne the im p a c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. Se e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). Ea c h pa rty sha ll be a r the ir own c osts for this petition for re v ie w. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; G RANT E D in par t; and RE M A NDE D.
1 2 - 7 3 0 2 0 2
1 

In The Matter Of: 

SERVED JUNE 27,2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0020 

BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC, Case No. 2011 EA 170024 

l 28 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF 

RULE 16 LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

On Apri123, 2012 an Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference and 

Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was ftled. Among other things, this Order directed 

the parties to file a Rule 26(f) Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan on or before June 20, 

2012. 

On June 27, 2012 the parties filed a Rule 26(f) Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery 

Plan. I 

On June 27,2012, the parties appeared by telephone for the scheduled Rule 16 Litigation 

Scheduling Conference, and discussed their calendar availability, hearing dates, and other 

litigation procedural matters. Among other things, the parties agreed that it woulCl be helpful to 

continue the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for one month, to facilitate additional 

settlement and discovery discussions. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.205(a)(1), (6) and (7), Civ. R. 16, 14 C.F.R. §13.217, and 14 

C.F.R. §13.220, and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulation, statutory-authority, and 

being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued by agreement of the 

parties. 

2. The second Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is set, by agreement of the 

parties, for Monday, July 23,2012 at ll:OOam Eastern time. The Office of 

Hearings shall.initiate the conference call. 

Page 1 of2 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Jason Dickstein, Respondent's Counsel 

Washington Aviation Group · 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., #503 

Washington, DC 20007 

TEL: 202 628-6776 

FAX: 202-628-8948 

ONE COPY 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0020 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite·2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 
3; Prior to July 23, 2012, if the parties reach a settlement and wish to move to cancel the 

conference, they must file the necessary settlement withdrawal notice or other 

necessary document(s) with the Office of Hearings. · 

an 

.in.iatfutive Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

Page 2 of2 

\.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David W. Hockenbrocht, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sparton Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 10, 2006 /s/ DAVID W. HOCKENBROCHT   David W. Hockenbrocht, Chief Executive Officer     
23
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)







In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pervasip Corp. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul H. Riss, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








Date: October
15,
2008                                                                        By: /s/ Paul H.
Riss


Paul H. Riss


Chief Executive Officer
and


Chief Financial Officer

















This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Boston,      November 12, 2008                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                                |        Peter J. Sonnabend |
|   | Name:  Peter      J. Sonnabend                           |
|   | Title:  Chief      Executive Officer and Vice Chairman   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                                |        Stephanie Sonnabend |
|   | Name:  Stephanie      Sonnabend                          |
|   | Title:   Chief      Executive Officer and President |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   |                                                               |   |
|   | /S/                                                                |        Boy A.J. van Riel |
|   | Name:   Boy      A. J. van Riel                     |
|   | Title:   Vice      President and Treasurer          |

----

----
<PAGE>
						      File Number:  33-84546
                                               Filed Pursuant to Rule 497(e)
                                               of the Securities Act of 1933

                                                               May 1, 2017


      Supplement to the Prospectuses and Summary Prospectuses, each dated
                                  May 1, 2017


Portfolio                                         Prospectus
---------                                         ------------------------------
Pioneer Bond VCT Portfolio                        Class I and Class II
Pioneer Emerging Markets VCT Portfolio            Class I and Class II
Pioneer Equity Income VCT Portfolio               Class I and Class II
Pioneer Fund VCT Portfolio                        Class I and Class II
Pioneer High Yield VCT Portfolio                  Class I and Class II
Pioneer Mid Cap Value VCT Portfolio               Class I and Class II
Pioneer Real Estate Shares VCT Portfolio          Class I and Class II
Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth VCT Portfolio       Class I
Pioneer Strategic Income VCT Portfolio            Class I and Class II


Pioneer Investment Management, Inc. (the "Adviser"), each portfolio's
investment adviser, is currently an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
of UniCredit S.p.A. ("UniCredit"). On December 12, 2016, UniCredit
announced that it has entered into a binding agreement for the sale
of its Pioneer Investments business, which includes the Adviser, to
Amundi (the "Transaction"). Amundi is headquartered in Paris, France,
and, as of December 31, 2016, had more than $1.1 trillion in assets
under management worldwide. The closing of the Transaction is
expected to happen in 2017, subject to certain regulatory and antitrust
approvals, and other conditions.

Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the closing of the Transaction
will cause each portfolio's current investment advisory agreement with the
Adviser to terminate. Accordingly, each portfolio's Board of Trustees has
approved a new investment advisory agreement for the portfolio, which will
be submitted to the shareholders of the portfolio for their approval.



                                                                   30136-01-0517
                                        (C) 2017 Pioneer Funds Distributor, Inc.
                                             Underwriter of Pioneer mutual funds
                                                                     Member SIPC
<TABLE>


                                                         EXHIBIT 21


                                                    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
                 Name                      State, Country of Incorporation               Doing Business As
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                                    <C>
Symtron Corporation                     California, USA                        Symtron Corporation
Pritec Corporation (1)                  California, USA                        Pritec Corporation
Elexsys International (Europe)          United Kingdom                         Elexsys International (Europe)
Limited                                                                        Limited
Anetec Technology, Inc.                 California, USA                        Anetec Technology, Inc.
ELXI Acquisition, Inc.                  California, USA                        ELXI Acquisition, Inc.

--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
<FN>
         (1) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Symtron Corporation.
</FN>
</TABLE>