alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.3
------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopsmith, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. May, Vice
President of Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







November 12, 2002                        By: /s/ Mark May
                                                Vice President of Finance
                                                And Treasurer
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 7,404  | 8,540  | 8,844  | 7,277  | 6,875  | 7,803 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,119  | 6,091  | 5,490  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### MILAM v. STATE.

No. 26856.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1954.

*141No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted as a second offender for the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $250.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 99    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 149    | 235    | 339    | 471    | 554    | 1,235  | 904    | 677    | 664    | 2,287 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,856  | 2,022  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 10.1

                    THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Third Amendment dated as of March 17, 1998 (Amendment) to Employment Agreement
dated as of November 1, 1994, as amended July 25, 1996 and December 9, 1997
(Employment Agreement), between American Stores Company, a Delaware corporation
(Company), and Martin A. Scholtens (Executive).  The Company and Executive are
collectively referred to as the Parties, and individually as a Party.

     WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment
Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual
agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows:

1.   Section VI-B of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the
following new subparagraph 2-A immediately following the Service Table set forth
in subparagraph 2 of Section VI-B:

          2-A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the minimum annual retirement
          benefit payable to Executive hereunder shall be Two Hundred Twenty
          Five Thousand Dollars ($225,000); provided, that Executive shall not
          be entitled to such minimum annual retirement benefit if he terminates
          the Parties' employment relationship prior to April 1, 2000 for any
          reason other than the Company's breach of a material provision of this
          Agreement.

2.   Except as specifically provided herein, the Employment Agreement shall be
unmodified and shall continue in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first above written.

                                   AMERICAN STORES COMPANY


                                   By:   /s/ Kathleen E. McDermott

                                   Name:  Kathleen E. McDermott

                                   Title: Chief Legal Officer &
                                            Assistant Secretary

                                   EXECUTIVE

                                   /s/ Martin A. Scholtens
                                   Martin A. Scholtens
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JOEL PAUL BACH §

§

Plaintiff-Appellant, §

§

v. § Case No. 03-14-00395-CV

§

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, §

§

Defendant-Appellee. §

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES Appellant Joel Paul Bach by and through undersigned counsel, 

hereby moves to withdraw his Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time to File 

Appellant’s Brief, filed in error on January 12, 2015 at 5:19 p.m.

1. The opinion in this appeal was issued on 12/17/14.

2. Appellant’s counsel has conferred with counsel for the other parties, none 

of whom oppose the relief requested herein. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully request an 

Order withdrawing the unopposed motion. 

Respectfully submitted,

David K. Sergi & Associates, P.C.

By: /s/David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi

State Bar No. 18036000

329 S. Guadalupe Street

San Marcos, Texas 78666

Telephone: (512) 392-5010

ACCEPTED

03-14-00395-CV

3744048

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/13/2015 10:05:04 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/13/2015 10:05:04 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

Facsimile: (512) 392-5042

E-Mail: david@sergilaw.com

Attorney for Joel Paul Bach

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

This is to certify that I, David K. Sergi, conferred with Appellee’s counsel, Erika 

M. Kane, via e-mail regarding the substance of this motion, and that Appellee’s counsel 

is unopposed. 

/s/ David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been 

sent via ECF/CM, on January 13, 2015 to:

Erika M. Kane

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

Erika.kane@texasattorneygeneral.gov

/s/ David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60826

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

L. B. SMITH, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CR-1-4-LN

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

L. B. Smith, III, appeals from his convictions for

conspiracy to distribute, and attempted possession with the

intent to distribute, approximately 11.5 kilograms of cocaine

hydrochloride, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, and 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) & 846. The Government has filed an unopposed motion

to file record excerpts out-of-time. The Government’s motion is

GRANTED.
No. 02-60826

-2-

Smith argues that 1) the evidence was insufficient to

support his convictions, 2) the district court erred in admitting

case agent Ryan Spradlin’s testimony attributing a cell phone to

Smith at the time of his arrest, and 3) the prosecutor improperly

referred to Smith, and testified as an unsworn witness, when

cross-examining co-defendant Travis Burks in connection with

Burks’s guilty plea. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the

parties and hold that the evidence presented at Smith’s jury

trial was sufficient to support his convictions. See United

States v. Izydore, 167 F.3d 213, 219 (5th Cir. 1999); United

States v. Ortega Reyna, 148 F.3d 540, 543 (5th Cir. 1998); United

States v. Casilla, 20 F.3d 600, 602 (5th Cir. 1994). Evidence

adduced at trial indicated that Smith accompanied his codefendant to the site of the drug deal, possessed and used a cell

phone to communicate with individuals and locations involved in

the drug trafficking, was referred to as a “partner” in the drug

trafficking, possessed a loaded 9 millimeter handgun at the scene

of the drug deal, and remained at the scene of the drug deal

after it was clear that drugs were present. This evidence is

sufficient to maintain Smith’s conviction. See United States v.

Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 698 (5th Cir. 2003); United States

v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1486 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Spradlin’s challenged statement, regarding Smith’s

possession of a cell phone, was cumulative to testimony
No. 02-60826

-3-

previously introduced at trial. Accordingly, any error resulting

from its admission was harmless. See United States v. Edwards,

303 F.3d 606, 623 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1192 (2002). 

Smith’s remaining argument, concerning the prosecutor’s alleged

improper cross-examination of co-defendant Burks, fails to

survive plain-error review. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S.

725, 732 (1993); United States v. Lankford, 196 F.3d 563, 574

(5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|New Mexico - East Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|New Mexico - East Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 716    | 1,667  | 5,282  | 4,719 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,279  | 6,514  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
# * Dignity Health "
Testimony of Dignity Health Regarding E PA and NHTSA ' s Propo sed Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fue l Ef fici ency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Ve hicl es, Engines, and Trailers August 1 8, 2015
On behalf of Dignity Health and over 400 care centers including hospita ls, urgent and occupational care centers, imaging centers, home health, and primary care clinics , we commend EPA for taking action to address the fuel efficiency and GHG emissions from medium- and heavy-duty trucks. We strong ly support the adopt ion of regulations requiring a 40% decrease in fuel consumption by 2025
. Dignity Health's healing mission and va lues compe l us to seek ways to further improve air quality and the health of communities throughout the Southwest. Strong Ph ase 2 standards offer a rare opportun ity to address serious health co ncerns associated with climate change and cut freight costs . Strict standards wi ll provide incentives to inc rease in vestment in clean truck technology and help the U
. S
. meet federal ozone standards, whic h Dignity Health actively s upports. Our nation 's cmTent heavy-duty truck fleet poses significant health ri sks to Americans across the country . Freight trucks ctmently account for about ha lf a bi lli on tons of c li mate forcing GHG em issions per year and are the fastest growing s ing l e source of GHG emissions in the United States. With strong Phase 2 standard s, the U.S. has the opportun ity to improve air quality and increase related health benefits, while sending common-se nse market signals to spur innovation and accelerate the development of cleaner, cost effective technologies. For these reasons, Dignity Health supports a strong Phase 2 standard requiring a 40% reduction in heavy truck fue l consumption by 2025
. Th ank you for your leadership on th is important issue.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4605 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the eligibility of 

activities in Puerto Rico for the deduction for income attributable to 

domestic production activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. PIERLUISI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the eligibility of activities in Puerto Rico for the deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4605 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF ACTIVI2 TIES IN PUERTO RICO FOR DEDUCTION FOR 

3 INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRO4 DUCTION ACTIVITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

6 199(d)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘first 6 taxable years’’ and in9 serting ‘‘first 8 taxable years’’, and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2012’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘January 1, 2014’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4450 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple 

fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4450 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fibers 

(polyacrylonitrile staple) 

containing 85 percent or 

more by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent 

or more but not over 3 

percent of water, colored, 

crimped, with an average 

decitex of 2.2 (plus or 

minus 10 percent) and 

fiber length of 45 mm 

(plus or minus 10 percent) 

and fiber tenacity of 40 

CN/TEX (plus or minus 

10 percent) (provided for 

in subheading 5503.30.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Blaine Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of Jet Gold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 28, 2007



/s/  Blaine Bailey

Blaine Bailey,

Chief Financial Officer













#
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2017

No. 04-16-00199-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Natalie Marie MEDINA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 478603

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On August 8, 2017, this court issued its first opinion in this appeal. Thereafter, appellee 

timely filed a motion for rehearing. This court denied appellee’s motion for rehearing, but 

withdrew our opinion and judgment of August 8, 2017, and issued a new opinion and judgment 

on October 18, 2017. Appellee then filed a second motion for rehearing on November 2, 2017. 

After review, we DENY the motion for rehearing filed by appellee on November 2, 2017. See 

Thomas v. State, 470 S.W.3d 577, 581 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2015), aff’d, 505 S.W.3d 

916 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court