alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 189 (Thursday, September 28, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24880]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2106; MM Docket No. 00-75; RM-9863]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Kahului, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 223C2 to Kahului, Hawaii, as that 
community's second local FM transmission service, in response to a 
petition for rule making filed by New West Broadcasting. See 65 FR 
33798, May 25, 2000. The allotment requires a site restriction 10.5 
kilometers (6.5 miles) southeast of Kahului at coordinates 20-50-24 NL 
and 156-23-14 WL.

DATES: Effective October 30, 2000. A filing window for Channel 223C2 at 
Kahului, Hawaii, will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of 
opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent Order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-75, adopted September 6, 2000, and 
released September 15, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Hawaii, is 
amended by adding Channel 223C2 at Kahului.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-24880 Filed 9-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PUSRUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIFCO Industries, Inc. ("Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Frank A. Cappello, Vice
President--Finance of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                          /s/  Frank A. Cappello
                                          ----------------------
                                            Frank A. Cappello
                                          Vice President--Finance
                                             August 9, 2002




                                      -16-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Montez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered November 27, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that the 41-*357month delay between the date of the crime and the date of his arrest deprived him of his due process right to a speedy trial *(see, People v Brown,*124 AD2d 667; *see also, People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241). The record establishes that the police were hindered in locating the defendant by the lack of cooperation of available witnesses and the defendant’s use of at least four different addresses identified through a Department of Motor Vehicles computer search. In fact, the police repeatedly surveilled two of the residences and their vicinity. There is nothing in the record to infer that the police delayed arresting the defendant for a tactical advantage *(see, People v Bryant, 65*AD2d 333), or that a loss of evidence or witnesses precluded the defendant from presenting a viable defense at trial *(see, People v Bonsauger,*91 AD2d 1001).

We further find that the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (3) to set aside the verdict based upon newly discovered evidence was properly denied for reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Grajales, dated April 2, 1985.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

         We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and
Co-Chief Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our
respective knowledge:

                  (1)      that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on June 30, 2002 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2002 at File No.
0-31049 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.



August 9, 2002                         /s/ William R. Cruz
--------------                         -----------------------------------------
Date                                   William R. Cruz
                                       Co-Chairman of the Board
                                       and Co-Chief Executive Officer



August 9, 2002                         /s/ Ralph L. Cruz
--------------                         -----------------------------------------
Date                                   Ralph L. Cruz
                                       Co-Chairman of the Board
                                       and Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### WELLS v. STATE.

No. 24675.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1950.

*211McCarthy, Collins & Snodgrass, by George S. McCarthy, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for .receiving and concealing stolen property, with a sentence of two years in the penitentiary.

This prosecution grew out of the burglary of a warehouse, in which whisky to the value of $11,500 was stolen. The indictment alleges, in two counts, that appellant received from Marion Guinn and Jack Taylor stolen property, being the whisky which had been taken in the burglary of the warehouse.

The record before us is rather lengthy and discloses a diligent and well conducted investigation on the part of the local officers, who were also assisted by a member, of the Ranger Force. They had secured statements from Melburn Kennedy and H. R. Owen which created circumstances supporting the charges lodged in the indictment. Kennedy had been before the grand jury and' Owens had made a Written statement to the Ranger. Upon such statements and the evidence given there, the indictment was returned. The state relied upon them as the only witnesses giving evidence making any connection between appellant and the stolen property. When placed on the witness stand each of these witnesses repudiated his statements to the officers and the grand jury and gave no evidence whatsoever which would, in the remotest Way, connect appellant with the theft or with receiving and concealing the stolen property. Each stated that- he knew of no such connection. The evidence impeaching the witnesses Owens and Kennedy cannot be used as primary evidence against appellant. Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 45, p. 209, Sec. 308; Hill v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 290, 269 S.W. 90.

Because the evidence wholly fails to support the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

HAWKINS, P. J., absent.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4661 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Spiromesifen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Spiromesifen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPIROMESIFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.71 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Spiromesifen) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of ev3 Inc.
 State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or
    
    Name UnderName
    
    Organization
    
    Which Does BusinessChestnut Medical Technologies, Inc.
    
    California
    
    N/AMicro Therapeutics, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    ev3 NeurovascularMicro Therapeutics International, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/ADendron GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    N/Aev3 Endovascular, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    ev3 Inc.ev3 Peripheral, Inc.
    
    Minnesota
    
    N/Aev3 International, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/Aev3 B.V.
    
    Netherlands
    
    N/Aev3 K.K.
    
    Japan
    
    N/Aev3 S.r.l.
    
    Italy
    
    N/Aev3 Australia Pty Limited
    
    Australia
    
    N/Aev3 Canada, Inc.
    
    Canada
    
    N/Aev3 SAS
    
    France
    
    N/Aev3 Europe SAS
    
    France
    
    N/Aev3 GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    N/Aev3 Technologies Iberica, S.L.
    
    Spain
    
    N/Aev3 Nordic AB
    
    Sweden
    
    N/Aev3 Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    N/Aev3 Comércio de Produtos Endovasculares do Brazil Ltda
    
    Brazil
    
    N/Aev3 Medical Devices (Beijing) Company, Ltd.
    
    China
    
    N/AFoxHollow Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/Aev3 Sp. z o.o
    
    Poland
    
    N/Aev3 Singapore Pte Ltd
    
    Singapore
    
    N/A
 104
#### TODD v. TODD.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 18, 1954.

John G. Prather, Somerset, for appellant.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein Andrew Todd was granted an absolute divorce, and Flora Todd’s counterclaim for an absolute divorce and $5,000 lump sum alimony was dismissed. Flora Todd’s ground for reversal is that the court erred in not awarding her alimony.

The parties were married in 1918. They lived together for 32 years and had four children. In 1949 they separated and this divorce suit resulted.

Flora Todd’s evidence is to the effect that in 1942 the couple left their' farm in Pulaski Qounty and went to Ohio to seek employment. They rented a home there and their daughter, son-in-law and grandchild lived with them. After they were settled Andrew went to work for- the B. & O. Railroad, while Flora Todd stayed at home and took care- of the house and tended to the grandchild. Todd began running around with other women, and came home drunk every night demanding that they engage in sexual relations, which she was unable to do. When she refused him he would choke her and tell her that he would find a younger woman who could satisfy his desires.. In the early part of 1949 the appellee returned to his farm in Pulaski County. Shortly thereafter Flora Todd returned, but, because of the cruel treatment she .received she had to go back to Ohio and live with her daughter.

Andrew’s evidence is to the effect that while the couple lived in Ohio his wife quarreled with him so much he had to resign from the Eagles’ Club; that even though he paid the larger part of the living expenses his'wife was claimed by the son-in-law as a dependent in order to stay out of the Army and reduce his income tax payments. While in Ohio Flora Todd sued him for divorce, but the court refused to grant one. Andrew Todd states further that in 1949, he decided to return to the farm in Pulaski County and asked his wife to go with him, but she refused; that shortly after he returned to Kentucky she followed him, but stayed only two weeks. At the end of that time she told him she would not live with him on the farm. He says also that, prior to the institution of this action, he made every effort to have her return and live with him as man and wife.

Flora Todd claims that she is entitled to $5,000, which is half the value of her husband’s farm, as lump sum alimony, because she was not at fault in causing the separation. The chancellor found that Andrew Todd was entitled to an absolute divorce and Flora Todd was not entitled to any alimony. The rule followed by this Court is that a finding of fact, such as involved herein, will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. CR 52.01.

We believe that the chancellor reached a fair disposition of the case.

Judgment affirmed.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | NA     | 0      | 0      | NA     | NA    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 21, 2011





/s/  "Ruth Swan"

Ruth Swan,

Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 30    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 24     | 37     | 32     | 17     | 12     | 43     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         212,107
<SECURITIES>                                   23,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  479,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                   51,931
<INVENTORY>                                    187,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               939,896
<PP&E>                                         727,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 541,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,130,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,473
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,651,835
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,130,375
<SALES>                                        1,291,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,322,326
<CGS>                                          176,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,066,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                64,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            64,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   64,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .004
        


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Difenoconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on Difenoconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Difenoconazole) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘2.3%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4508 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS