alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2631-007]

      ( print page 57807)    
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is reviewing the International Paper Company's application for a new license for the continued operation of the Woronoco Project on the Westfield River in Massachusetts. At this time, the Commission staff does not anticipate holding any public or agency scoping meetings, nor does the Commission staff anticipate conducting a site visit for the Woronoco Project. Rather, the Commission staff is issuing a Scoping Document 1 and soliciting written comments on that document, which are due on November 6, 2000.

For further information concerning the scoping process for the Woronoco Project, please contact Allan Creamer, at (202) 219-0365, or file a letter with David P. Boergers, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24617 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 28, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JIMMY JOEL

HERNANDEZ-BANEGA, a/k/a Jimmy

Cruz, a/k/a Jimmy Diaz, a/k/a Jimmy

Diaz-Cruz, 

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-1061

(D.C. No. 1:15-CR-00329-WYD-1)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER

Before HOLMES, MURPHY, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Jimmy Joel Hernandez-Banega challenges his twentymonth term of imprisonment and three-year period of supervised release. He

argues that the district court improperly applied a twelve-level sentencing

enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B).

On March 15, 2017, however, the government filed a notice advising our

court that Mr. Hernandez-Banega was deported to Honduras following completion

of the custodial portion of his sentence. Although Mr. Hernandez-Banega

remains legally subject to a term of supervised release, his deportation means that
he “has no obligation to report to a probation officer and is not under the

supervision or control of the United States Probation Office.” United States v.

Vera-Flores, 496 F.3d 1177, 1181 (10th Cir. 2007). Mr. Hernandez-Banega’s

removal has therefore “eliminated all practical consequences associated with

serving a term of supervised release,” id. at 1181, and he has no “actual injury

which this court can remedy,” id. at 1182. Similarly, Mr. Hernandez-Banega “has

failed to demonstrate the presence of collateral consequences arising from any

alleged errors the . . . district court made during [his] sentencing proceeding.” Id.

And the mere possibility of his reentry (along with the attendant revival of his

obligation to comply with his supervised-release conditions) is too speculative to

avoid dismissal for mootness. See id. at 1181–82.

Accordingly, Mr. Hernandez-Banega’s removal has rendered this appeal

moot. See id. at 1182 (dismissing an appeal on mootness grounds following

deportation); see also United States v. Pena-Flores, 240 F. App’x 281, 283 (10th

Cir. 2007) (same), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1281 (2008). Therefore, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 60601 Summary Calendar

PATRICK L. KING , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. JAMES HOOD, State Attorney General; PATRICK BEASLEY, State Assistant Attorney General; LEE MCDIVITT, State Attorney General Investigator; AL FARRISH, JR., HPD Investigator; LAMAR PICKARD, Copiah County Circuit Judge; THERESA LUMLEY, Copiah County Official Court Reporter; CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Former Mississippi Department of Corrections Commissioner; SHERRY ROBINSON, Former Director of Records; EVELYN DIXION, Project Officer III; ELISHA CARMICHAEL; BOBBY MOAK, Former Representative; GEORGE FLAGGS, Former State Representative; WILLIE BAILEY, Representative , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 859

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under t he limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 28, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-60601 Document: 00515431778 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2020No. 18

- 60601

2 Proceeding pro se , Patrick L. King sued state officials in October 2017 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961

– 1968 , seek ing redr ess for alleged wrongs arising out of his 2012

– 13 arrests , conviction, and sentenc ing for pirating DVDs and CDs under state law

. The district court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss on various grounds, including that his suit was untimely under the applicable three

- year Mississippi statute of limitations and the four

- year statute of limitations for civil RICO claims

. See Cuvillier v. Taylor , 503 F.3d 397, 401 (5th Cir. 2007) ; Corwin v. Marney, Orton Inv s
. , 843 F.2d 194, 199 (5th Cir. 1999)

. King timely appeal ed. We review dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) de novo

. Smith v. Hood , 900 F.3d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 2018). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. R2 Inv s . LDC v. Phillips , 401 F.3d 638, 642 (5th Cir. 2005). Review of the re cord and King’s briefs filed in this appeal show no error in the district court’s conclusion that his suit was time

- barred. Insofar as King argues that limitations should be tolled due to fraudulent concealment, s ee Ross v. Citifinancial, Inc. , 344 F.3d 45 8, 463

- 64 (5th Cir. 2003), this argument fails because King fails to allege any particular acts of concealment on the part of the defendants

. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all outstanding motions are DENIED. Case: 18-60601 Document: 00515431778 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2020
#### Roberta Seitzman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Esther Bloom, Deceased, Appellant, v Hospital of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Defendant, and Jay M. Coblentz, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Turret, J.), entered on June 26, 1989, which granted defendants’ motion to strike the word "death” from plaintiff’s bill of particulars, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, with costs.

Plaintiff’s decedent’s estate brought this action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering. There is no cause of *178action for wrongful death inasmuch as there are no eligible distributees.

The motion court reasoned that inclusion of the word "death” was an attempt to add a cause of action for wrongful death, rather than to amplify the pleadings. We disagree.

Because the estate would be entitled to recover funeral expenses pursuant to EPTL 11-3.3, the inclusion of the word "death” in the bill of particulars is proper, and not an attempt to add a nonviable wrongful death cause of action. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
#### Josiah BROOKS v. STATE.

No. 27285.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 13, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft; the penalty assessed is a fine of -$100.00.

Since perfecting his appeal the appellant has filed a written, motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the, appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




I, Simon
B. Moss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications
Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      SIMON B. MOSSName:
            Simon
      B. MossDate: July 31,
      2008
            Title:
            Chief
      Executive Officer






I, Robert
J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications
Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      ROBERT J. HABIGName:
            Robert
      J. HabigDate: July 31,
      2008
            Title:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Mark A. May, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shopsmith, Inc. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date: November 15, 2005
Exhibit 10.83
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
[Executive Name]
 Agreement Effective
Date Company  Executive
    Term of Employment Board Employer provided however Employment Term
 Position
 Chief Executive Officer
 provided




---



##### 



provided
 Base Salary Base Salary
 Annual Bonus Annual Bonus Incentive Plan Target Bonus
 Employee Benefits and Perquisites; Business Expenses
 Employee Benefits ITC Plans Employee Benefits
 Perquisites
 Business Expenses
 2




---



##### 



Equity Participation Equity Documents
 Termination provided provided further
 By the Employer For Cause or By Executive Resignation Without Good Reason
  Cause nolo contendere
 3




---



##### 



Accrued Rights
  Disability or Death
 Disability
   4




---



##### 



By the Employer Without Cause or by Executive Resignation for Good Reason
  Good Reason Good Reason
 th
      5




---



##### 



Severance
Period Severance Payment provided 409A Period
   6




---



##### 



if then
  Notice of Termination Notice of Termination
 7




---



##### 



Board/Committee Resignation; Execution of Release of all Claims
   Non-Competition
  Restricted Period Person
    8




---



##### 



Competitive Business
        9




---



##### 



Confidentiality
 Confidential Information
 Confidential Information provided
 provided
 10




---



##### 



Specific Performance
 11




---



##### 



Arbitration so long as
 Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Entire Agreement/Amendments
 No Waiver
 Severability
 Assignment ab initio
 Set Off; No Mitigation
 12




---



##### 



Successors; Binding Agreement Company provided however
 Notice
  
  
   13




---



##### 



Executive Representation
 Prior Agreements provided however
 Cooperation
 Taxes
 Withholding Taxes
 409A Compliance and Penalties
 409A
Penalties
 14




---



##### 



so long as
 Counterparts
 Signatures on next page
 15




---



##### 



Signature Page to Employment Agreement
 
 ITC HOLDINGS CORP.:
    
    
    
    EXECUTIVE:By:Its:
 16
Experimental:

 HPLC Conditions (TLF) 

 Column: Micro Solv Cogent Bidentate C8 

 Column pore size; 4 μm 

 Column temperature: 40°C 

 Detector: Agilent 1100 series refractive Index 

 Mobile phase A: 55% Methanol/45% Water containing 2mL 

Trifluoroacetic acid (v/v/v) 

 Flow rate: 0.5 mL/minute 

 Injection volume: 6 μL sample 

 Stop Time 20 min
SERVED: JUNE 14, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GREAT LAKES AVIATION, LTD 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2011 - 0672 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on November 27,2012, inclusive, in the. Courtroom #601 Alfred A. Arraj United 

States Courthouse, 90119th Street, 2nd Floor, Denver CO. 80294. Hearings will 

commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. Theparties shall vacate the 

courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. · 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper 

pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

Attachment- Service List ·""· 

1 

3: 00 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-. Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Timothy R. Thornton, Respondent's Counsel 

Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 

2200 IDS Center 

80 South 8th Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157 

TEL: 612-977-8400 

FAX: 612-977-8650 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0672 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

. 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 . . 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -

-2-
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Image Metrics, Inc. (formerly known as
International Cellular Accessories); (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald Ryder, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 3, 2010





/s/ Ronald RyderRonald
      RyderChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paragon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                    /s/ Leonard S. Yurkovic
                    ------------------------------------------------------------
                    Leonard S. Yurkovic
                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                    November 13, 2003




                    /s/ Ronald J. Semanick
                    ------------------------------------------------------------
                    Ronald J. Semanick
                    Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
                      and Treasurer
                    November 13, 2003
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00123-CR

SIR JASON DOUGLAS ROBINSON, JR.,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District 

Court

of Denton County (F22-184-211)

May 9, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Carl J. Grivner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and     
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 10, 2003

/s/ Carl J. Grivner
Carl J. GrivnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


42
Exhibit 32.2          Certification.

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C. 63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  August 18, 2004

(signed)_____________________
Edward  Alexander
/s/  Edward  Alexander
Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.


<PAGE>