alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4658 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Deltamethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Deltamethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Deltamethrin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements."
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         399,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,792,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   442,614
<INVENTORY>                                  6,983,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,315,999
<PP&E>                                       1,729,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 904,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,892,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,951,520
<BONDS>                                        332,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       379,540
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,228,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,892,417
<SALES>                                     12,112,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,393,279
<CGS>                                        9,756,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,590,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             373,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,279,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,279,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,279,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Fowler, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on October 31, 1988, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, who was arrested following an undercover "buy- and-bust” operation, pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, in exchange for a promised sentence of five years’ probation and time served, on condition that defendant appear for sentencing, cooperate with probation authorities, and not commit any further criminal acts. Defendant did not appear for sentencing and was returned on a warrant six weeks later. Defendant then moved to withdraw his plea, asserting that he was innocent and had pleaded guilty under duress. The motion was denied without a hearing, and defendant was sentenced as noted above.

The motion to withdraw a plea will not be granted where *155the court sufficiently inquires into the assertion of innocence and there is not supporting factual matter for the assertion. *(People v Woodham,*79 AD2d 1062.) An evidentiary hearing as to a claim such as duress is not required where a limited interrogation by the court will suffice. *(People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926.) The court sufficiently inquired into the alleged claims. As the terms of the sentence promise had been violated, the court acted properly in imposing a greater sentence. *(See, People v Sepulveda,*151 AD2d 335.) Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4433 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4433

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Buprofezin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Buprofezin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUPROFEZIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        (Z)-2-tert-         Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Butylimino-3-                                                     12/31/2015
                          isopropyl-5-
                          phenyl-1,3,5-
                          thiadiazinan-4-
                          one (Buprofezin)
                          (CAS No. 69327-76-
                          0 or 953030-84-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2934.99.16)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             (As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-oxley Act of 2002)

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Solitron  Devices,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shevach
Saraf,  Chairman,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Treasurer  and  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:   July 13,  2004                  /s/  Shevach Saraf
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Shevach Saraf
                                        Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer,Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                        Officer
#### Howard RUTLAND and Earl Jim Seber, Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23365.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 20, 1946.

C. W. Falvey, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

PIAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

■Conviction was for theft, punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary for each of appellants.

Appellants have filed with this court proper affidavit advising that they no longer desire to prosecute this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed at request of appellants.
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

Press Release, issued by PVH Corp. on April 29, 2019.

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | By:    /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                                                                               |
|   |         Mark D. Fischer        Executive Vice President |
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE IS RESTATED PURSUANT TO REG S-K, ITEM 601 (c) 2 (III) TO 
COMPLY WITH SEC REQUIREMENTS FOR FASB NO. 128 EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1996             AUG-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996             MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                            1048                    1048
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19349                   19349
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      11978                   11978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33611                   33611
<PP&E>                                          121201                  121201
<DEPRECIATION>                                   45781                   45781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  110359                  110359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14293                   14293
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          2228                    2228
<OTHER-SE>                                       72502                   72502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    110359                  110359
<SALES>                                          29690                   84741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29690                   84741
<CGS>                                            23219                   66150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4311                   12495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59                     448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2101                    5648
<INCOME-TAX>                                       630                    1695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1471                    3953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1471                    3953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17                     .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16                     .46
        

</TABLE>
#### WILKERSON v. ANGEL et ux.

No. 9732.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

June 23, 1948.

Ewell H. Muse, Jr., and Morgan Nes-bitt, both of Austin, for appellant.

Smith, Rotsch & Steakley and Cecil C. Rotsch, all of Austin, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

A car driven by Mrs. Angel collided with one of Wilkerson’s trucks. In a trial to jury upon special issues damages to the Angel car were assessed at $199.96. Judgment was rendered accordingly against Wilkerson and he has appealed.

We have carefully considered the entire record and briefs and oral arguments in behalf of both parties, and have reached the conclusion that no reversible error is assigned and that the judgment is in accord with both substantial and legal justice. We therefore affirm the -trial court’s judgment upon the authority of San Antonio & A. P. R. Co. v. Gooch, Tex.Civ.App., 247 S.W. 917, in which this court, speaking through the late Chief Justice Key, said: “The questions presented in appellant’s brief have all been carefully considered, and, as they present nothing new, and as .this court is quite willing to comply with the recommendation of the American Bar Association, and the suggestion often made by attorneys generally (except in their own cases) t-o the -effect that appellate courts decide more cases without written opinions, we refrain from writing an extended -opinion, and announce that the judgment of the trial court .is affirmed.”

See also Associated-Indemnity Corporation, v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294, the late Chief Justice Bickett writing for the San Antonio Court.

■Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2005-4 (the "Trust")

I, Joseph A. Lloret, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 31, 2006, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/JOSEPH A. LLORET
      Name:  Joseph A. Lloret
      Title:    Assistant Vice President |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 31, 2006
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2023 Workiva-->
<!--r:bb07ac47-62f6-421e-9e6b-5c5ccbb8c194,g:31410ff5-db91-478f-9e2e-2600e0db126d-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:pvh="http://www.pvh.com/20231101" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.pvh.com/20231101">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20231101_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20231101_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="DocumentandEntityInformationDocument" roleURI="http://www.pvh.com/role/DocumentandEntityInformationDocument">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Document and Entity Information Document</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
  <xs:element id="pvh_CoverPageAbstract" abstract="true" name="CoverPageAbstract" nillable="true" xbrli:periodType="duration" substitutionGroup="xbrli:item" type="xbrli:stringItemType"/>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 276   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 423    | 799    | 1,131  | 1,748  | 1,778  | 4,070  | 2,671  | 1,594  | 1,939  | 3,392 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,954  | 2,706  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00442

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N .E.G., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 415TH DISTR ICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On January 3, 20 14, January 13, 2014
, and February 18, 2014 , we notified

appellant in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would
dismiss this appeal unless the $1 9 5 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $1 9 5 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5,

12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of
appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 16 , 20 13
, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Ap pellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 20, 2014

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the S upreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals

, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Aug. 16 , 20 13 ) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




I, Robert
F. Kirk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications
Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      Robert F.
      KirkRobert
      F. KirkChief
      Executive OfficerDate: May 7,
      2010
            
            (Principal
      Executive Officer)







I, Elias
A. MurrayMetzger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Avistar Communications Corporation.





By:
            /s/
      Elias A.
      MurrayMetzgerElias
      A. MurrayMetzgerChief
      Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate
      SecretaryDate: May 7,
      2010
            
            (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)