alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7574
FREEMAN L. HANKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DON WOOD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02046-H) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freeman L. Hankins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Freeman L. Hankins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or j udge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hankins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Hankins’ motion for authorization, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Salomon Sredni, Chief
Executive Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|            |  |                        
|----------- |  | -----------------------
|May 7, 2009 |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date        |  | Salomon Sredni         
|            |  | Chief Executive Officer
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-10251A, styled State of Texas v. Geronimo Saenz,

pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00024-CR

IN RE Geronimo SAENZ

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On January 13, 2010, relator Geronimo Saenz filed an original petition for writ of habeas

corpus in this court. However, as an intermediate court of appeals this court is not authorized to

grant the relief requested. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil

matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint of

liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of the

violation of an order, judgment, or decree previouslymade,rendered, or entered by the court or judge

in a civil case.” TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004). However, in criminal matters,

a court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500
04-10-00024-CR

-2-

(Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 1999, no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus

are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX.CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (Vernon 2005). Therefore, we dismiss this petition for writ of habeas

for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Commission Act that a meeting of the Death Valley National Park Advisory Commission will be held October 11 and 12, 2000 at the Furnace Creek Inn within Death Valley National Park.

The main agenda will include:
    - Death Valley National Park's Revised Draft General Management Plan;
    - Updates on Park Operational Plans;
    - Appropriate field trips within Death Valley National Park, if time allows.

The Advisory Commission was established by PL #03-433 to provide for the advice on development and implementation of the General Management Plan.

Members of the Commission are Janice Allen, Kathy Davis, Michael Dorame, Mark Ellis, Pauline Esteves, Stanley Haye, Sue Hickman, Cal Jepson, Joan Lolmaugh, Gary O'Connor, Alan Peckham, Michael Prather, Wayne Schulz, and Gilbert Zimmerman.

This meeting is open to the public.

Richard H. Martin,

Superintendent, Death Valley National Park.

[FR Doc. 00-24500  Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING  CODE 4310-70-P
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Gerald J. Burnett       |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar CommunicationsCorporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ ROBERT J.  HABIG    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Robert J. Habig         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | the                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December                31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the                information contained in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the                fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ZENAIDA PEREZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00208-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01249)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the conviction and remand the cause for new trial, in accordance 

with the opinion of this Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., Not Participating
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12346]


Clean Energy Resources Advisory Committee

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State will host a virtual, open meeting of 
the Clean Energy Resources Advisory Committee (CERAC). There will not 
be an in-person option for this meeting.

DATES: CERAC will meet virtually March 22, 2024 from 1:30 p.m. to 3 
p.m. (EST).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Energy Resources, Energy 
Officer Mark Murray at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26656374676566555247524308414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adeee8ffeceeedded9ccd9c883cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>, 771-205-0994.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: This Committee will provide input and advice regarding 
energy minerals and metals, their supply chains, and end uses. This 
meeting will focus on the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) and 
Minerals Investment Network for Vital Energy Security and Transition 
(MINVEST) efforts, as well as outcomes and results from COP28, and the 
impact of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) one year on.
    Participation: Members of the public wishing to participate must 
RSVP by March 20, 2024, via email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcbfb9aebdbfbc8f889d8899d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c5f594e5d5f5c6f687d6879327b736a">[email protected]</span></a> (subject line: 
RSVP). The Department will provide login information prior to the 
meeting. Requests for reasonable accommodation should be submitted no 
later than March 15, 2024. Reasonable accommodation requests received 
after that date will be considered but may not be possible to fulfill.
    Any written comments should be emailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0e3e5f2e1e3e0d3d4c1d4c58ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="76353324373536050217021358111900">[email protected]</span></a> with 
``PUBLIC COMMENT'' as the subject line at least 48 hours before the 
start of the meeting. During this meeting, there will not be an option 
for members of the public to make oral statements.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1009 and 22 U.S.C. 2651a)

Mark J. Murray,
Energy Officer, Bureau of Energy Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-04143 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ZENAIDA PEREZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00208

- CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01249)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the conviction and remand the cause for new trial, in accordance

with the opinion of this Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., Not Participating
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30833 Summary Calendar

DOUGLAS R. CYREX ET AL., Plaintiffs, DENICE M. CYREX, on behalf of Aaron Cyrex, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ASCENSION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD; STATE OF LOUISIANA, Department of Education; RAYMOND ARVESON, Superintendent, DR.; LEON L. BORNE, DR., Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * DOUGLAS R. CYREX, Etc. ET AL., Plaintiffs, DENICE M. CYREX, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ASCENSION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. * * * * * * * * * * DOUGLAS R. CYREX ET AL., Plaintiffs, DENICE M. CYREX, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ASCENSION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD; STATE OF LOUISIANA, State of Louisiana through the Department of Education, Defendants-Appellees.No. 98-30833 -2-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 95-CV-603, 95-CV-852, 95-CV-1848

- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Denice M. Cyrex, on behalf of Aaron Cyrex, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the Ascension Parish School Board and the State of Louisiana, Department of Education. Cyrex argues that the district court improperly applied the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. , as it existed prior to the enactment by Congress of the IDEA Amendments Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-07, 111 Stat. 37 (June 4, 1997). We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties. We have found no material facts in dispute and agree with the district court’s application of the law. See Cefalu v. E. Baton Rouge Parish Sch. Bd. , 117 F.3d 2312 (5th Cir. 1997). AFFIRMED.
#### FREEMAN v. STATE.

No. 26738.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of selling whisky in a dry area and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Attachment A 

Evidence of ARB Public Hearing Notice
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0717

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DARRELL DEAN SHARP,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 22, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 8 2024

03/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0717
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Mintz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David Mintz *
-----------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 30, 2007

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Services Acquisition Corp. International (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Steven R. Berrard,President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial andAccounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 (1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

|                  |  |  |                                                                                                                                            |
|------------------|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August2,2006Date |  |  | /s/ StevenR. Berrard                                                                                                                |
|             |  |  |      (PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal      Financial andAccounting Officer) |
|                  |

This certification is beingsubmitted solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification isnot to be deemed ‘‘filed’’ for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subjectto the liability of that section, nor will the certification be deemedincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent thatthe registrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GILBERT M. MARTINEZ,

Petitioner

v.

ROBERT J. SHENKIN, JEFFREY K. 

SPRECHER, THOMAS G. PARISI IN THEIR 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 48 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Ex Parte Motion to Void 

Judgment Abinito [sic],” the Application for Relief, and the Application for Relief Pursuant 

to Pa.R.A.P. 123 are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of 

the jurists from the caption.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4453 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4453

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Acrylic staple      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fibers                                                            12/31/2015
                          (polyacrylonitril
                          e staple)
                          containing 85
                          percent or more
                          by weight of
                          acrylonitrile
                          units and 2
                          percent or more
                          but not over 3
                          percent of water,
                          colored, crimped,
                          with an average
                          decitex of 2.2
                          (plus or minus 10
                          percent) and
                          fiber length of
                          50 mm (plus or
                          minus 10 percent)
                          and fiber
                          tenacity of 38 CN/
                          TEX (plus or
                          minus 10 percent)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5503.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```