alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.3****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance**The Board of DirectorsPrincipal Financial Group, Inc.Principal Life Insurance CompanyWe have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying report titled Report ofManagement on Compliance, that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Life Insurance Company(collectively, the “Company”) complied with the specified standards identified in Exhibit A to theReport of Management on Compliance (the “specified standards”) with respect to the secured notesissued by Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 9 during the year ended December 31, 2005.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those specified standards. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, ona test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the specified standards and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the specified standards.In our opinion, management’s assertion that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal LifeInsurance Company complied with the aforementioned specified standards during the year endedDecember 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects. 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                                                            
Des Moines,IowaMarch 13, 2006
 

 
**Report of Management on Compliance**I, as a member of management of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Life InsuranceCompany (collectively, the “Company”), am responsible for complying with the standards identifiedin the attached Exhibit A (the “specified standards”) with respect to the secured notes issued byPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 9. I am also responsible for establishing and maintainingeffective internal control over compliance with these specified standards. I have performed anevaluation of the Company’s compliance with the specified standards as of December 31, 2005 and forthe year then ended. Based on this evaluation, I assert that during the year ended December 31,2005, the Company complied, in all material respects, with the specified standards./s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
#### Marlon RITCHIE and Mark Cann, partners, doing business as Ritchie Coal Company, Appellants, v. R. N. CORNETT, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 15, 1954.

Napier & Napier, Hazard, for appellants.

Alva A. Hollon, Hazard, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment for $200 in favor of the plaintiff who sought damages for the injttry to his real estate allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendants in the operation of a coal loading ramp. The ■ issues were properly submitted to the jury, and we find that the evidence supported the verdict.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of China Techfaith Wireless
Communication Technology Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Defu Dong, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 29, 2007

By:    /s/ Defu Dong
       ----------------------------
Name:  Defu Dong
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-130338, 333-136117, and 333-156502) and Form S-8 (No. 333-144862,
No. 333-124626 and No. 333-138674) of Cadiz Inc. of our report dated March 11,
2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K/A.










PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


Los
Angeles, California


April 30,
2009
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 (TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LOGO) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Maurice B. Tosé, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (the Registrant), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Maurice B. Tosé  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Sam BANKS et al., Appellants, v. Maude Dixon CORBER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 6, 1953.

See, also, 243 S.W.2d 661.

Faulkner & Faulkner, W. E. Faulkner, Hazard, for appellants.

Don A. Ward, S. M. Ward, Hazard, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) the jury was not acquainted with the verdict of the jury on the former trial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

DUNCAN, J., did not sit in this case.
June 30, 2014

Mr. Randell Lanfell Director of Operations Empire Airlines

11559 North Atlas Road Hayden, ID 83835

Dear Mr. Lanfell:

This is in response to your May 28, 2014, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0359) petitioning the Federal Avia tion Administration (FAA) on behalf of Empire Airlines (Empire) for an exemption from § 121.436(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if gr anted, would allow Empire a reduction in the minimum flight time requirements and the airline transport pilot (ATP) certification requirement for second in command pilots flying cargo-only, propeller-powered airplanes of not more than 60,000 lbs. maximum takeoff weight.

On August 1, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-216). Independent of any rulemaking proceeding by the FAA, § 216 of Public Law 111-216 directs that all flightcrew members in part 121 air carrier operations must hold an ATP certificate, issued under part 61, by August 2, 2013. As such, this was a self-enacting provision and the FAA was not afforded any latitude in this certification requirement. Theref ore, the FAA incorporated the provision into § 121.436(b) when the Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations final rule published on July 15, 2013.

Because the relief you seek is a requirement under Public Law 111-216, § 216, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Leslie H. Smith Division Manager, Air Transportation Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32
 COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date:  March 23, 2009
    /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.William F. Farber, Sr.President and Chief Executive Officer   163




---



##### 



COMM BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.
 Date: March 23, 2009
    /s/ Scott A. SeasockScott A. SeasockExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer   164
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Service Air Group, Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, I, Mohammad Sultan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Service Air Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service Air Group, Inc. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Mohammad Sultan*

Mohammad SultanChief Executive Officer
 

By:   

*/s/*   *Mohammad Sultan*

Mohammad Sultan Chief Financial Officer
Dated: September 15, 2006

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric Pike

J. Eric Pike
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
September 13, 2010/s/ Anthony K. Slater

Anthony K. Slater
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 13, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Vasquez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered January 24, 1989, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing him, as a predi*237cate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 10 to 20 years, is unanimously affirmed.

On August 16, 1988, the defendant stabbed the decedent five times, after the decedent had made sexual advances towards him. The defendant pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in exchange for a promised sentence of 8 to 24 years. Prior to sentencing, a predicate felony statement was filed, alleging a Federal conviction for distributing heroin under 21 USC § 841 (a) (1).

Defendant argues that the Federal conviction was improperly considered for enhanced sentencing because, under New York law, it could be considered a felony or a misdemeanor. We do not agree. In order for a foreign conviction to serve as a predicate felony in New York, the conviction must have been for a crime whose elements are equivalent to those of a New York felony. *(People v Gonzalez,*61 NY2d 586.) Distributing a controlled substance under 21 USC § 841 (a) (1) would be the equivalent of the distribution of a narcotic under Penal Law § 220.39, and thus would constitute a felony under New York law. The court properly sentenced the defendant as a predicate felon. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10.39
 Third Amendment  to  Loan and Security Agreement
 THIRD AMENDMENT SILICON VALLEY BANK EV3
ENDOVASCULAR, INC. EV3 INTERNATIONAL, INC. MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. Borrowers th
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1. Definitions.




---



##### 



2. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
 2.1 Section 6.7(b) (Waiver of TNW Default).
 2.2 Section 6.7(b) (Elimination of TNW Covenant)
 2.3 Agreement Regarding Certain Events of Default.
 2.4 FoxHollow.
 3. Limitation of Amendments.
 3.1
 2




---



##### 



3.2
 4. Representations and Warranties.
 4.1
 4.2
 4.3
 4.4
 4.5
 4.6
 4.7
 3




---



##### 



5. Counterparts.
 6. Effectiveness
 7. Fee
 4




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 Borrowers:EV3 ENDOVASCULAR, INC.
    
    
    
    EV3 INTERNATIONAL, INC.By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. SpanglerName:
    
    Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Patrick D. SpanglerTitle:
    
    Vice President and
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    TreasurerChief Financial Officer
 MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC.By 
Name:
    
    /s/ Patrick D. Spangler

 Patrick D. SpanglerTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 Bank:SILICON VALLEY BANKBy
    
    /s/ Jay McNeilName:
    
    Jay McNeilTitle:
    

Senior Relationship Manager
 5
Exhibit 32.2

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Financial Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.



May 16, 2006

/s/Edward Alexander
Edward Alexander
Chief Financial Officer
**Attachment 3: Retlif RTCA/DO -**  **160F Section 21 Category M Emission of Radio Frequency Energy T** 

**est Report**
#### THOMAS v. STATE.

No. 26847.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1954.

•No attorney Qn appeal for appellant..

• Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the. State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the driving, while intoxicated, of an automobile upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $50 and ten days in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2285 

To amend the War Powers Resolution to require the President to develop 

a post-deployment strategy when introducing the United States Armed 

Forces into hostilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2011 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the War Powers Resolution to require the President to develop a post-deployment strategy when introducing the United States Armed Forces into hostilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-deployment Strat5 egy Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF POST-DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY. 

7 (a) PURPOSE AND POLICY.—Section 2(a) of the War 

8 Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541(a)) is amended by 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2285 IH

1 striking ‘‘circumstances, and to the continued use of such 

2 forces in hostilities or in such situations’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘circumstances, to the continued use of such forces in hos4 tilities or in such situations, and to the post-deployment 

5 strategy described in section 8(d).’’. 

6 (b) REPORTING.—Section 4(a) of the War Powers 

7 Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1543(a)) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

9 the end; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period 

11 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding after subparagraph (C) the fol13 lowing new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(D) the post-deployment strategy de15 scribed in section 8(d).’’. 

16 (c) INTERPRETATION OF JOINT RESOLUTION.—Sec17 tion 8 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547) 

18 is amended— 

19 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub20 section (e); and 

21 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol22 lowing new subsection: 

23 ‘‘(d) For purposes of this joint resolution, the term 

24 ‘post-deployment strategy’ means a clear plan of action 

25 that— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2285 IH

1 ‘‘(1) articulates the interests of the United 

2 States at stake; 

3 ‘‘(2) defines the policy objectives of the United 

4 States with respect to such introduction; 

5 ‘‘(3) lays out a strategy for achieving the policy 

6 objectives referred to in paragraph (2); and 

7 ‘‘(4) includes a plan for withdrawal of United 

8 States Armed Forces from such hostilities or such 

9 situations based on the achievement of the policy ob10 jectives referred to in paragraph (2).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LARRY CHAMBERS AND ABIE

WOLF,

Appellants,

V.

RICARDO RIVERA AND

CIMARRON CONYERS,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00061

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCV1525 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of the Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8


No. 333-_____) pertaining to the PVH Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 28, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PVH Corp. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PVH Corp. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 29, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





New York, NY





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





September 6, 2012
Exhibit 10.17

Boise Cascade, L.L.C.1111 West Jefferson Street PO Box 50 Boise, ID 83728
T 208 384 6161 F 208 384 7298
www.bc.com

February 6, 2008

Alexander
Toeldte
1901 Claremont Drive
Boise, ID 83702

Dear
Alexander:

Boise
Cascade, L.L.C. (the "Company") considers it essential to the best interests of its investors to foster the continuous employment of key management personnel in the event certain
material events are threatened or occur. In this regard, the Board of Managers (the "Board") of Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C., the Company's parent, has determined that appropriate steps should be
taken to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of identified members of the Company's management, including yourself, to their assigned duties without distraction for a period
of time.

In
order to induce you to remain in the employ of the Company, the Company agrees that you shall receive the severance benefits set forth in this letter agreement (the "Agreement") if
your employment is terminated under the circumstances described below.



---







2

---





3

---





4

---





5

---





6

---





If
this letter correctly sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof, kindly sign and return to the Company the enclosed copy of this letter which will then constitute our
agreement on this subject.

Very
truly yours,

|/s/ W. Thomas StephensW. Thomas Stephens               |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|WTS/cw                                                 |  |  |  | 
|AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 6th day of February, 2008.
|/s/ Alexander ToeldteAlexander Toeldte                 |  |  |  | 

7

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40456

Conference Calendar

 

MARCOS ORTIZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONNA BROWN; MARIA L. MERCADO,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-361

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcos Ortiz (Ortiz), Texas prisoner # 1049113, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous. Ortiz was convicted of aggravated robbery and

aggravated assault. He filed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

against his court-appointed attorney and investigator in that

criminal proceeding. Ortiz argues that his attorney and

investigator conspired to deny him due process and deprive him of

equal protection by failing to investigate his case. He contends

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-40456

-2-

that an investigation of the case would have shown that the

charges against him were fabricated.

Ortiz’s allegations are ones alleging “harm caused by

actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence

invalid.” See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486 (1994). Under

Heck, Ortiz’s allegations are not actionable because he has not

shown that his conviction has been reversed on direct appeal,

expunged by the executive, invalidated by other state means, or

called into question by the issuance of a federal habeas writ. 

Id. at 487. 

Accordingly, Ortiz’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of his complaint and appeal in

this matter each count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Ortiz has accumulated at least two other “strikes.” See Ortiz v.

Fernald, No. 04-20186, 2004 WL 1372935 (5th Cir. June 18, 2004)

(unpublished). Thus, Ortiz is BARRED from proceeding in forma

pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) SANCTIONS

IMPOSED.