alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, William R. Cruz, Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of
TradeStation Group, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. August 9, 2004
    
    By: /s/ William R. CruzDate
    
    William R. Cruz
Co-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Energy Production, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Charles Bitters, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Charles Bitters, Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Name:  Charles Bitters


Date:    June 25, 2010
THOMAS J. WOODY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4860

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Roberto Arias , Judge

.

Thomas J. Woody, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CU RIAM.

DISMISSED

.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Tennessee Natural Gas Processed in Tennessee (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Tennessee Natural Gas Processed in Tennessee (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 6,200  | 6,304  | 5,721  | 5,000  | 4,612  | 4,330  | 4,269  | 3,657  | 319   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 221    | 343    | 348    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit
      32





Certification
      Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Solitron Devices, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shevach Saraf, as
      Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief Financial
      Officer of Solitron Devices, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that
      to
      my knowledge:





1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      October 15, 2008


/s/
                Shevach SarafShevach
                SarafChairman,
                President,Chief
                Executive Officer,Treasurer
                and Chief Financial Officer
`Promissory Note
$ 50,000.00 USD                Temple, Texas                   Date April 23, 01



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 

                 THE SUM OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00)


In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.5% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.

THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) principal due in one year (on or before
April 23, 2002). Interest of 270.83 per month due monthly beginning on May 23,
2001.

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
constitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.

                            David Hancock, President`
Appendix D.5 

VISTAS Emission Inventory 

Supporting Documentation 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobile Source Emission Inventory 

(February 2004 version), Pechan .....................................................................................................3 

Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emissions Inventory for 

VISTAS, MACTEC, Inc................................................................................................................62 

Memorandum to VISTAS State Point Contacts and VISTAS EGU Special Interest Workgroup, 

from Gregory Stella, June 13, 2005.............................................................................................318 

Appendix D.5 - 1 

Pre-Hearing Draft

Regional Haze SIP for TN Class I Areas

Appendix D.5 - 1

January 18, 2008
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|California State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|California State Offshore Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions and Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Terry McConnaughey, director and president of Silver Butte Company (formerly Silver Butte Mining Company) (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 13, 2005



By:    /s/ Terry McConnaughey

Terry McConnaughey, President and Director
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 10    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 19     | -8     | -7     | 4      | -20    | 11     | 32     | 3      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 9      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-542-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 19, 2000.
    Take notice that, on September 12, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to become effective 
March 27, 2000:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 120
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 153
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 159
Third Revised Sheet No. 160A

    ANR states that it is making this filing to modify its tariff to 
conform to Order No. 637's removal of the price ceiling on short term 
released capacity.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24522 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Joseph Sopata 

Chemist 

USEPA/OAR/OTAQ/CISD/FPSG 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., 6406J 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: 

Submission for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07) 

Dear Joe: 

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is 

submitting the following information to EPA at your request as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 

211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation: 

• Supplemental Report and Errata to Section 211(B) Tier 2 High End Exposure Study of 

Conventional and Oxygenated Gasoline 

The draft Final Report, submitted earlier on March 25, 2009, underwent review by two independent 

peer-reviewers, outside QA/QC, EPA, and the 211(b) Technical Workgroup. We look forward to EPA’s 

approval to finalize this report. The enclosed supplemental information expands the presentation of 

data included in the earlier draft final exposure report. If you require further information or have any 

questions, please contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Will M. Ollison, Ph.D. 

Senior Science Advisor 

Regulatory and Scientific Affairs 

1220 L Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005-4070 

USA 

Telephone 202-682-8262 

Email Ollisonw@api.org 

www.api.org
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

__________________________ No. 12

- 14896 Non

- Argument Calendar

__________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:11

- cv - 62504

- WJZ TROY M. BOONE, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus COURTESY BOAT RENTALS & YACHT CHARTER, INC., d.b.a. Best Boat C lub & Rentals, CLEVELAND HOUSE, INC., AL AN J. RUBIN, a Florida R esident , Defendants

- Appellees.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________ ( October 23, 2013) Before MARTIN, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-14896 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Page: 1 of 32 Troy Bo one challenges on appeal the district court’s order dismissing hi s action for answering a motion th irty days late. T he parties agree that the district court abused its discretio n by dismissing the action with neither a clear record of delay nor a finding that les ser sanctions would not suffice. W e vacate the district court’s order and remand for furth er proceedings. On January 6, 2012, Courtesy Boat Rentals & Yacht Charters (“Courtesy”) filed a motion to dismiss Boone’s complaint. Local Rule 7(1)(c) required Boone to respond to the motion by January 23, 2012. Boone failed to file his response until February 22, 2012. The case proceeded for over three months with the court referring the case to mediation, setting the date for a pre

- trial conference, and providing trial instructions. Then, with out warning, the court dismissed Boone’s action with prej udi ce because he failed to respond to the motion to dismiss within seventeen days as required by Local Rule 7(1)( C ) . Boone moved the court for relief from the judgment due to excusable neglect and explain ed that he had made

a simple calendaring error

. Th e court summarily denied Boone’s motion. Parties must meet deadlines in order to preserve the efficiency of our busy district courts. And yet, despite an abundance of care, mistakes will no doubt occur for “to err is human.” T he drastic sanction of dism issing a case with prejudice is only proper where “there is a clear record of delay or willful contempt

Case: 12-14896 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Page: 2 of 33 and a finding that lesser sanctions would not suffice.” Kilgo v. Ricks , 983 F .2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted)

. We review a district court’s order dismissing a n action for failure to comply with local rules for an abuse of discretion. Id. at 192. Both parti es agree

— and our independent re view of the record convinces us

— that the district court abused its di scretion by dismissing this ac tion without a clear record of delay or a finding that lesser sanctions would not suffice. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order dismissing the case and remand for further proceedings

. 1
VACATED AND REMANDED.

1 Appellant has filed an unopposed motion seeking leave to amend his complaint to correct deficient allegations of jurisdiction. The motion is GRANTED.

Case: 12-14896 Date Filed: 10/23/2013 Page: 3 of 3