alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|            |  |  |  |                                        
|----------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|Date        |  |  |  | David H. Fleischman                    
|            |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer,               
|            |  |  |  | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
Group TR Annual TR ozone Remedy

Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity Change

Alabama 2 x x 219 215 -5

Arkansas x 91 90 -1

Florida x 113 116 3

Georgia 2 x x 159 160 1

Illinois 1 x x 210 209 -1

Indiana 1 x x 241 235 -6

Iowa 1 x x 75 74 -1

Kansas 2 x x 41 42 0

Kentucky 1 x x 146 177 31

Louisiana x 128 130 2

Maryland 1 x x 27 27 0

Michigan 1 x x 190 213 23

Minnesota 2 x 43 43 0

Mississippi x 28 28 0

Missouri 1 x x 182 180 -1

Nebraska 2 x 65 65 0

New Jersey 1 x x 6 6 0

New York 1 x x 20 24 4

North Carolina 1 x x 117 109 -9

Ohio 1 x x 230 208 -22

Oklahoma x 136 136 0

Pennsylvania 1 x x 250 224 -27

South Carolina 2 x x 84 87 3

Tennessee 1 x x 97 96 -1

Texas 2 x x 244 244 0

Virginia 1 x x 67 63 -3

West Virginia 1 x x 119 117 -2

Wisconsin 1 x x 78 77 0

TR Total 2,641 2,623 -19

Group 1 Total 2,034 2,020 -14

Group 2 Total 608 603 -5

SO2 (thousand tons)

2012
Remedy

Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity Change Remedy

Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity

173 171 -2 74 74

107 104 -3 33 33

147 145 -2 72 72

93 91 -2 61 62

128 128 -1 48 48

177 186 9 110 110

78 77 -1 37 37

46 49 3 31 31

117 125 9 84 84

137 137 0 29 30

30 29 -2 16 16

158 170 12 59 58

45 46 0 31 31

29 29 0 24 24

177 170 -8 51 51

70 70 0 26 26

6 6 0 7 8

13 17 4 18 18

63 68 5 48 47

151 162 11 85 83

138 138 0 43 43

123 132 9 118 117

97 96 0 33 34

65 68 3 33 33

266 266 0 133 133

39 41 3 33 33

83 89 6 56 56

44 45 1 31 31

 2,233 2,263 30 1,126 1,123

 1,655 1,681 26

 578 582 4

EMISSIONS AT FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED UNITS >25 MW

 (thousand tons)

2014 2012
Change Remedy

Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity Change Remedy

1 68 68 0 32

0 37 36 -1 15

0 75 75 0 28

0 40 40 0 27

0 49 49 0 21

0 109 109 0 47

0 38 38 0 16

0 24 24 0 13

0 76 77 1 35

0 30 30 0 14

0 17 17 0 7

-1 57 58 1 25

0 31 31 0 13

0 25 25 0 11

0 49 47 -2 22

0 27 27 0 12

0 8 8 0 3

0 17 17 0 8

0 42 42 0 21

-2 84 84 0 35

0 44 44 0 21

-1 117 116 -1 50

0 36 36 0 14

0 20 20 0 14

0 137 138 1 63

-1 35 35 0 14

0 53 54 0 23

0 30 30 0 13

-3 1,101 1,099 -1 563

IL FUEL-FIRED UNITS >25 MW

Annual NOx (thousand tons)

2014
Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity Change Remedy

Sensitivity with 

Revised Variabliity Change

32 0 30 30 0

15 0 17 16 -1

28 0 29 29 0

27 0 18 18 0

21 0 21 21 0

47 0 47 46 -1

15 0 16 16 0

13 0 10 10 0

35 0 32 32 0

14 0 14 14 0

7 0 7 7 0

25 -1 24 25 0

13 0 13 14 0

11 0 11 11 0

21 -1 21 20 0

12 0 12 12 0

3 0 4 4 0

8 0 8 8 0

21 -1 18 18 0

35 0 36 36 0

21 0 21 21 0

51 0 50 50 -1

14 0 15 15 0

14 0 8 8 0

63 0 64 64 0

14 -1 15 15 0

23 0 22 22 0

13 0 13 13 0

 560 -3 543 542 -2

Ozone Season NOx (thousand tons)

2012 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL ADAMS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, J. Beard, Secretary, in

his/her individual and official capacity; et

al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 56224

D.C. No. 5:15

- cv

- 01067

- SJO

- PJW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Paul Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 56224

revoking his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status. We have juris diction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismi ssal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g ).

Andrews v. King , 398 F.3d 1113, 1118 n.6 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district c ourt properly revoked Adams’s IFP status because at the time

Adams filed the complaint, he had filed three actions that qualified as “strikes,”

and he did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of serious

physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

Andrews v. Cervantes , 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing the

imminent danger exception to § 1915(g)).

We reject a s unsupported by the record Adams’s contention that he is

entitled to default judgment.

We reject as without merit Adams’s contention s concerning fraud , leave to

amend, and judicial bias.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ANDRE WARE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 245 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended August 3, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating & Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:September 11, 2014By:/s/ MICHAEL SHAFFERName:Michael ShafferExecutive Vice President andChief Operating & Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WEBB v. STATE.

No. 26740.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

*254No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $200.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### Phillip (Peg) WARD and Faye Ward, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 18, 1955.

G. C. Perry, III, Paintsville, for appellants.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment in this case sentencing each of the defendants to 60 days in jail and a $100 fine on a charge of illegally selling intoxicating beverages. The alleged improper questions asked by the Commonwealth’s Attorney did not constitute reversible error.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte Ralph O. LUCAS.

No. 27509.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 2, 1955.

Ruff P. Wall, Carthage, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the Texas Prison System, seeks his release for the following reason.

The record before us reflects that relator was on September 12, 1947, convicted in cause No. 58523 in the Criminal District Court of Harris County and his punishment assessed at 10 years. On May 14, 1948, relator was convicted in cause No. 58518 in the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County and his punishment assessed at 10 years. The sentence in 58518 contained the following order: “ * * * and this sentence shall begin when the sentence in cause No. 58523 from Harris County shall cease to operate.”

We had almost the identical situation before this Court recently in Ex parte McFarland, Tex.Cr.App., 274 S.W.2d 71, in which we said, “Since cause No. 55423 was in a different court, this cumulation is ineffective.”

Relator has furnished this Court with a certificate from the Texas Prison System showing that he has credit for time served in excess of 10 years and he is therefore entitled to be discharged.

It is so ordered.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Citi Trends, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce D. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: April 13,   2011                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/   Bruce D. Smith                                   |   |
| Bruce   D. Smith                                       |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer)         |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citi Trends, Inc. and will be retained by Citi Trends, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of American Energy Production, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Charles Bitters, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/
      Charles Bitters


Name:
      Charles Bitters


Date:
      November 13, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-5870

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AGNES PATRICIA DIXON, a/k/a Pat Dixon, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron Mc Gowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-463) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Langdon D. Long, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Agnes Patricia Dixon pled guilty to two counts of a nineteencount indictment charging Dixon with conspiracy and substantive violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1014 (West 1976 and Supp. 1996) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 215(a)(1), (2) (West 1969). The district court sentenced Dixon to serve fourteen months imprisonment followed by five years of supervised release and to pay a special assessment fee of $100. She appeals her convictions and sentence. Dixon's attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising one issue but indicating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Dixon was informed of her right to file a pro se supplemental brief, which she has failed to file. Dixon's counsel raises the question of whether the district court complied with requirements outlined in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure when taking Dixon's plea. Following a de novo review of the entire record, we conclude that the district court complied with all the mandates of Rule 11 in accepting Dixon's guilty plea. We therefore affirm Dixon's conviction and sentence. In accordance with the requirements of Anders , we have examined the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of her right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition3 would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
** **

** **

**Exhibit 23.3**

** **

** **

** **

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

ThePartners of

ParkwayProperties Office Fund, LP:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.333-156050) on Form S-3, the registration statements (Nos. 333-100565,333-115286, and 333-134069) on Form   S-8, the registration statements (Nos.333-88861 and 333-00311) on Form S-8 on Form S-3 and the registration statement(No. 333-156051) on Form S-3D of Parkway Properties, Inc. of our report on ParkwayProperties Office Fund, LP (the Partnership) dated February 26, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated historical-cost statements of operations, changesin partners' capital, and cash flows of the Partnership for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, not included herein, as well as the supplementalconsolidated current-value statements of operations and changes in partners'capital for the year ended December 31, 2007, not included herein, which reportappears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of ParkwayProperties, Inc.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

 

Jackson, Mississippi

March5, 2010

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000411

17-JAN-2020

08:13 AM
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                        
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Texas Offshore Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS, et al., Petitioners, v. Eiva DUCKWORTH, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of W. W. Lackey, Deceased, Respondent.

No. A-4365.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1954.

John Ben Shepperd, Atty. Gen., and Billy E. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioners.

H. C. Ray, Fort Worth, for respondent.

GRIFFIN, Justice.

We adopt the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case as reported in 260 S.W.2d 632 as the opinion of this Court.

*99Judgments of Ae Court of Civil Appeals and of the trial court are hereby in all things affirmed.

GARWOOD and CULVER, JJ., dissenting.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

t0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144890

DEBORAH MAZUR, Personal Representative

of the Estate of John Mazur, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144890

COA: 300519

Wayne CC: 09-028133-NO

DETROIT DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION, BAILIFF JOHN

DOE 1, and BAILIFF JOHN DOE 2,

Defendants, 

and

BAILIFF FRED DIXON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GILBERT M. MARTINEZ,

Petitioner

v.

ROBERT J. SHENKIN, JEFFREY K. SPRECHER, THOMAS G. PARISI IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 48 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10 th day of August , 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Ex Parte Motion to Void

Judgment Abinito [sic],” the Application for Relief, and the Application for Relief Pursuant

to Pa.R.A.P. 123 are DENIED. The P rothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of

the jurists from the caption.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00373-CR

ALFREDO GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR13504)

February 28, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s count two judgment for unlawful possession of a 

firearm. That judgment is affirmed.

This court holds that there was error in the trial court’s count one judgment for 

possession of four or more, but less than two hundred, grams of methamphetamine 

with intent to deliver and incorporated order to withdraw funds. The 

methamphetamine-possession judgment and incorporated order to withdraw funds 

are modified to delete the $180 restitution award, $12 restitution installment fee, $30 

witness conveyance fee, and $45 of the arrest fee. The amended bill of costs is 
modified in the same manner (except for the restitution) so that it assesses only $429 

in total court costs. It is ordered that the trial court’s methamphetamine-possession 

judgment is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 29, 2006