alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

|                | For        | Against   | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote |
|---------------------|------------|-----------|---------|-----------------|
| Mary Baglivo        | 65,726,718 | 532,072   | 85,602  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Brent Callinicos    | 66,230,477 | 16,994    | 96,921  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Emanuel Chirico     | 64,710,023 | 1,371,140 | 263,229 | 2,777,938       |   |
| Juan R. Figuereo    | 65,851,954 | 403,089   | 89,349  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Joseph B. Fuller    | 64,460,965 | 1,330,101 | 553,326 | 2,777,938       |   |
| V. James Marino     | 65,876,743 | 381,264   | 86,385  | 2,777,938       |   |
| G. Penny McIntyre   | 64,752,777 | 1,508,888 | 82,727  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Henry Nasella       | 62,750,857 | 3,508,292 | 85,243  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Edward R. Rosenfeld | 64,354,191 | 1,904,340 | 85,861  | 2,777,938       |   |
| Craig Rydin         | 63,307,255 | 2,950,864 | 86,273  | 2,777,938       |   |

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                       |
|   | By:   /s/ Mark D. Fischer   |
|   | Mark D. Fischer, Executive Vice President  |
|   |                                       |
A district court has limited discretion to deviate from the NRS

125B.070 child support formula, and any deviation must be based on the factors in NRS 125B.080(9). Love v. Love, 114 Nev. 572, 579, 959 P.2d 523, 528 (1998). Each parent has a "duty to provide the child necessary maintenance, health care, education and support," NRS 125B.020(1), and it is presumed that the needs of the child are met by the NRS 125B.070 child support formula, NRS 125B.080(5). This court reviews district court child support awards for an abuse of discretion. Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996).

Having reviewed the parties' arguments and the appendix to appellant's fast track statement, we are not persuaded that the district court abused its discretion when it did not impose an upward deviation from the child support formula and denied appellant's request that respondent pay for a share of the extracurricular, activities requested by appellant. Fernandez v. Fernandez, 126 Nev. 28, 40, 222 P.3d 1031, 1039 (2010) (explaining that "[t]he child's best interest, in the support setting, is tied to the goal of the support statutes generally, which is to provide fair support, as defined in [the statutory formula] and [NRS] 125B.080"); Wallace, 112 Nev. at 1019, 922 P.2d at 543. As to appellant's argument that the district court failed to make findings regarding an upward deviation analysis, because the district court did not grant the deviation, it did not need to make specific findings of fact regarding the NRS 125B.080(9) factors. See NRS 125B.080(6) (providing that "[i]f the amount of the awarded support. . . is greater or less than the amount which would be established under the applicable formula" the court shall set forth findings for the basis of the deviation); Anastassatos v. Anastassatos, 112

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A cepNev. 317, 320, 913 P.2d 652, 654 (1996) (stating that the justification for

any non-conformity with the statutory formula must be specified in written findings of fact).

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Parraguirre 

# /ea J. Douglas

cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Pecos Law Group Steinberg Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3

(0) 1947A 

### e
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Madison River
Capital, LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Sunu, as Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ PAUL H. SUNU
------------------------------------------------------

Name:   Paul H. Sunu
Title:  Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer
        and Secretary
Date:   May 15, 2006





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Docket No: FAA-2015-7533 Dir ID: 2015- NM -080- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman

Airlines for America Robert Ireland
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4501 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4501

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Esfenvalerate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Esfenvalerate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESFENVALERATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Esfenvalerate) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Texas - RRC District 8 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 201   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 273    | 309    | 401    | 383    | 948    | 1,210  | 1,083  | 1,367  | 900    | 1,124 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 575    | 918    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
p.1 

OAR Box 1834 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

32) IV-E-05 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/10/2008 2:14:35 PM Sheet 32 of 61 
^o sr4t 

•Sr ____ ty. 

*: 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

P.2 

AUG 1 0 1392 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

Meeting Between EPA and the Motor & Equipment 

Manufacturers Association (MEMA) 

Carolyn Krueger, Chemical EngineerCyUA/y^^^^^T 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch / 

Docket A-90-07 ^ ^ 

Judith Gray, Project Manager /<£<£ 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

Glenn W. Passavant, Branch Chief ^(iQ^^jj) ijxJLM^i^f 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

On Thursday, May 28, 1992, Sheri Dunatchik, of EPA, met with 

Paul Haluza, of MEMA, to discuss MEMA's concerns about the likely 

effects of the proposed fuels and fuel additives registration 

program on small aftermarket fuel additive producers and the need 

for small business provisions in the program. 

Ms. Dunatchik explained that one reason EPA did not propose 

specific small business provisions in the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking was because only limited information was available from 

which to define "small fuel and fuel additive business". She also 

explained the procedural difficulties and restrictions involved if 

EPA or its contractor were to conduct a survey to obtain the needed 

information. Mr. Haluza suggested that it might be possible for 

MEMA to survey its members for such information, and offered to 

consult with other MEMA representatives about this possibility. 

Ms. Dunatchik agreed that any information MEMA could provide would 

be helpful and that further discussion was warranted.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000411 17-JAN-2020 08:13 AM
#### STEPHENSON v. BURTON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 29, 1954.

*270H. K. Spear, J. S. Sandusky, Somerset, for .appellant.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

The appellee, John L. Burton, filed an-ex parte petition in the Pulaski County Court to close a strip of road approximately 60 poles in length between his farm and that of the appellant, Jesse Stephenson. The county judge dismissed the petition. Burton appealed to the Pulaski Circuit Court and was granted the relief sought. Stephenson appealed to this Court and we reversed the judgment in the case of Stephenson v. Burton, Ky., 246 S.W.2d 999, because of the manner in which the trial was conducted and directed that a new trial be had.

The Honorable Lilburn Phelps sat as special judge on the second trial. He decided the case in Burton’s favor. The regular judge, Honorable R. C. Tartar, was a witness for Burton. His testimony showed that the road in dispute had been laid out while he was county judge, and with Burton’s permission. At that time the land over which the road ran belonged to Burton’s children, but it was under his charge.

*On*this *appeal*counsel for Stephenson contends that Judge Tartar’s testimony was incompetent, and that the judgment is contrary to both the law and the evidence. Judge Tartar’s testimony is objected to because Burton did not own the land when the road was laid out in 1925. We fail to see how this would make his testimony incompetent. As we have noted, Burton was in charge of the land at that time and Judge Tartar was merely testifying as to the conditions under which the road was opened. We find no basis for the contention that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence. Judge Phelps reviewed the facts and circumstances pertaining to the . disputed roadway in his opinion, and it amply supports the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 20, 2005
#### Ralph ANDREW, Appellant, v. TRIMBLE COUNTY COMMITTEE FOR KENTUCKY TOBACCO COMMISSION et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 9, 1955.

C. L. Bell, Louisville, for appellant.

James F. Thomas, Newcastle, for appel-lees.

SIMS, Judge.

Appellant, Ralph Andrew, brought this action against the members , of the Trimble County Committee for Kentucky Tobacco Commission to obtain possession of a tobacco marketing card, which his affidavit valued at $700, and for $2,500 damages for the detention of the card. James- D. Black filed an intervening petition averring he was the owner of the land the year the tobacco in question was grown on it and that he was entitled to the marketing card. The trial judge entered an interlocutory order adjudging that the marketing card be taken to the warehouse where the tobacco was sold and directing the warehouse to issue a check for one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the tobacco to the tenant, Henry Trimble, who grew the tobacco.’ This order further directed the warehouse to issue a check to the clerk' of the Trimble Circuit Court “for one-half of the procéeds in dispute between the plaintiff, Ralph Andrew, and' the intervening petitioner, James D. Black, which said sum shall be retained by the Clerk, subject to further orders of this Court.”

It is evident from a mere glance at.this order that it is not a final .judgment but an interlocutory order. Under CR 73.01 an *824appeal can be taken only from a final order. We agree with counsel for appellees that the appeal must be dismissed as it is attempted to be prosecuted from an interlocutory rather than a final order.

The appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0000090357
<NAME>        NET TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,436
<PP&E>                                          28,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,319
<OTHER-SE>                                    (211,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,462
<SALES>                                         10,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               159,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (149,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (149,786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Annual Report of Madison Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Gallo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Joseph Gallo




Joseph Gallo


Chief Executive Officer


April 14, 2011








Page - 1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Annual Report of Madison Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Cozine, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Steven Cozine






Steven Cozine


Chief Financial Officer


April 14, 2011







Page - 2
|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|Texas - RRC District 9 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                             
|Texas - RRC District 9 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023