alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.5




AMENDMENT


TO THE


SALLIE MAE SUPPLEMENTAL 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN




This Amendment to the Sallie Mae Supplemental 401(k) Savings Plan as most recently restated effective as of June 25, 2015 is effective as of the dates set forth below by SLM Corporation (the “Company”).
WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Sallie Mae Supplemental 401(k) Savings Plan, originally effective as of January 1, 1983 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan, by action of its Board of Directors (the “Board”) or its designee, pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Board has delegated certain powers and authority related to the Plan, including amendment authority for the Plan, to the SLM Corporation Retirement Committee (the “Committee”); and


WHEREAS, the Company has determined that the Plan shall be amended in the following particular, effective as of the date indicated below:


NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in the following particular, effective as of the date provided below:


		
	1.
	Effective as of March 5, 2019, the second paragraph of Section 5.3 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:




“Effective as of the Distribution, as defined in the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2014, by and among SLM Corporation, New BLC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SLM BankCo”), and Navient Corporation, each Supplemental Savings Plan Account with amounts deemed invested in SLM Corporation common stock will be credited with one share of Navient Corporation common stock and one share of SLM BankCo common stock for each share of SLM Corporation common stock credited to such account. Following the Distribution, any additional deferrals deemed to be invested in Company stock will be deemed invested in SLM BankCo common stock, and no additional deferrals will be deemed invested in Navient common stock.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends declared on Corporation common stock maintained in the Corporation stock fund pursuant to the Supplemental Savings Plan shall be deemed to be reinvested in Corporation common stock maintained in the Corporation stock fund in accordance with the Supplemental Savings Plan’s recordkeeping procedures.”













FURTHER RESOLVED, that the members of the Committee (and any employee of SLM Corporation authorized by the Committee) are hereby authorized and directed to take all such actions, execute all such documents, and undertake any other actions that are necessary or desirable, in their discretion, to effectuate the foregoing in connection with the implementation of the above described actions.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on March 1, 2019.




SLM CORPORATION
    
By:         /s/ Bonnie Rumbold_____________
Bonnie Rumbold
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
PAD District / Refinery Location Total Atmospheric Distillation Capacity (bbl/cd) Crude Oil Total Downstream Charge Capacity (bbl/sd) Date Operable Date of Last Operation Date Shutdown 

## Table 13. New, Shutdown and Reactivated Refineries During 2008

a b NEW PAD District IV 3,000 2,500 

### Northcut Refining LLC Douglas, WY 3,000 2,500 10/08 OTHER PAD District III 0 0 

### Belvieu Environmental Fuels Mont Belvieu, TX 0 0 12/05 c PAD District V 120,200 285,300 

### ConocoPhillips Company Rodeo, CA 120,200 285,300 d
SHUTDOWN PAD District V 0 10,000 

### Paramount Petroleum Corporation Portland, OR 0 10,000 11/06 12/08
a b

### bbl/cd=Barrels per calendar day. bbl/sd=Barrels per stream day. Historically the ConocoPhillips Rodeo and ConocoPhillips Santa Maria refineries have operated as one refinery, but were reported separately on Form EIA-820, "Annual Refinery Report." They began reporting as one entity with the 2009 Refinery Capacity Report. d c

### Belvieu Environmental Fuels is a subsidiary of Enterprise Products Corporation. The Mont Belvieu plant does not have any atmospheric crude oil distillation capacity or downstream charge capacity, but is included in the total refinery counts on Table 1. The isooctane production capacity is included on Tables 2, 4, and 7. Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Form EIA-810, "Monthly Refinery Report" and Form EIA-820, "Annual Refinery Report."

Energy Information Administration, Refinery Capacity 2009 

### 53
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 2,033  | 6,109 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,979  | 5,022  | 3,300  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.7thcoa.courts.state.tx.us PEGGY CULP

CLERK

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

September 8, 2014

Cindy Hellstern

Assistant County & District Attorney

109 S. Jackson St.

Waxahachie, TX 75165-7832

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Jeannette M. Loucks

LOUCKS & DREW, PLLC

820 Ferris Ave., Suite 225

Waxahachie, TX 75165-2684

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Numbers: 07-13-00349-CR, 07-13-00404-CR, 07-13-00405-CR,

07-13-00406-CR, 07-13-00407-CR, 07-13-00408-CR, 07-13-00409-CR,

07-13-00410-CR, 07-13-00411-CR

Trial Court Case Numbers: 1210762, 1210762, 1210762, 1210762, 1210762,

1210762, 1210762, 1210762, 1210762

Style: Michelle Lorraine Lehman v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned causes.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on

file with this Court, if any

, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours, 

# Peggy Culp

PEGGY CULP, CLERK

xc: Honorable Gene Calvert (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Cindy Polley (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6941

MICHAEL P. WILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-110-3)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael P. Wills, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Wills appeals from the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his

action seeking compensation for damages to his personal property.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Wills, No. CA-99-110-3

(E.D. Va. June 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
---

---

Exhibit 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-72654,
333-48605 and 333-79567) of Tofutti Brands Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2009, with
respect to the financial statements of Tofutti Brands Inc., included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2008.

/s/ Amper, Politziner &
Mattia, LLP

Edison, New JerseyMarch 26, 2009



---

---
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 30 32

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Bu ckRic ha rd Hans br ou gh

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of No rth Dako ta - Bi sm arck

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 6, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Ju ne 12 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SHEPHERD, KELLY, an d GRAS Z, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Bu ck Han sb ro ug h di rect ly ap pe al s aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty to a dr ug ch arg e, pu rs ua nt to a pl ea ag reem en t th at co nt ai ne d an ap pe al waiv er, an d th e di st ric t co ur t 1

The Hon or ab le Dan ie l L. Hov la nd , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t 1 fo r th e Dis tri ct of No rth Dako ta

.im

po se d a pr is on te rm be lo w th e Gui de li ne s ran ge

. His co un se l ha s m ov ed fo r le av e to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Ca li fo rn ia , 3 86 U.S. 7 38 (1 96 7) , whi ch do es no t ack no wled ge th e ap pe al waiv er, an d ar g u es th at th e di st ric t co ur t

co m m it t e d pr oc ed ur al se nt en ci ng erro rs an d im po se d a su bs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

se nt en ce. In a pr o se br ie f, Han sb ro ug h al so arg ue s th at th e di st ric t co ur t co m m it te d pr oc ed ur al se nt en ci ng erro rs an d im po se d a su bs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le se nt en ce, an d ad di ti on al ly ass ert s t ha t h e rec ei ve d i ne ffec ti ve ass is ta nc e o f co un se l.

To be gi n, we de cl in e to co ns id er Han sb ro ug h’s cl ai m of in effe ct iv e as si st an ce of co un se l on di rect ap pe al

. See Uni te d St at es v. Ram ire z-Her na nd ez, 44 9 F.3 d 82 4, 82 6- 27 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (in effe ct i v e -as si st an ce cl ai m s are us ua ll y be st li ti ga te d in

co ll at eral pro ceed in gs , wher e rec or d c an be pro pe rly dev el op ed ).

A s to th e arg um en ts ch al le ng in g th e pr oc ed ur al an d su bs ta nt iv e reas ona ble ne ss of th e s e n t e nc e, we co nc lu de th at th e ap pe al waiv er is va li d, ap pl ic ab le , an d

en fo rcea bl e. See Uni te d St at es v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo
rev ie w of va li di ty an d ap pl ic ab il it y of ap pe al waiv er); Uni te d S t a t e s v
. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 89 0- 92 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ) (d is cu ss in g en fo rcem en t of ap pe al waiv ers ). Fu rth erm or e, we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al ou ts id e th e sc op e of th e ap pe al waiv er. Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t co un se l’s m ot i o n , a nd we di sm is s t hi s ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 21, 2006



* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)    
|View History: Annual                              
|View History: Annual                              
|View History:                                     
|                                                  
|U.S. Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                  
|                                                  
|U.S. Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,209,101 | 4,338,883 | 4,373,920 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# Beechcraft Corporation



# Model 1900D Airliner

Structural Inspection

Manual

TECHNICAL DATA CONTAINED IN THIS MANUAL IS FAA APPROVED

Copyright © 2013 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation. All rights reserved. Hawker and Beechcraft are trademarks of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation.

_____________________________________________________________________



# Published by Beechcraft Corporation
P.O. Box 85 / Wichita, Kansas / 67201-0085 USA

The export of these commodities, technology or softwa re are subject to the US Export Administration Regulations. Diversion contrary to US law is prohi bited. For guidance on export control requirements, contact the Commerce Department's Bureau of Export Administration at 202-482-4811 or visit the US Department of Commerce website. P/N 129-590000-65E P/N 129-590000-65E5

Reissued: November 1, 2007 Revised: May 1, 2013 7/16/2013 2:06:05 PM

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Date/Time: March 1-3, 2001, 8 am--4:30 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rooms 
1020 and 1060, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Harry Warchall, Program Director, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
(703) 292-4861.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for finanacial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the 
Materials & Mechanics Panel as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-24410 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### William HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27705.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1955.

C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Hous*875ton, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, 25 years.

The injured party Johnson testified that he was attending his grocery store on the night in question, that his wife and a youthful customer were also present when the appellant and his companion entered the store, that the appellant pointed a pistol at him and informed him that he was being held up and appellant’s companion pushed him away from the cash register, that at this moment his wife escaped through the rear of the store, and when the appellant went after her he himself ran out of the store and down the street. Johnson stated that after he had gone a short distance the appellant passed him in a red and black 1953 model Buick driving at a high rate of speed, that he returned to his store and found that $80 was missing from the cash register and that he later identified the appellant in a police lineup.

Mrs. Johnson corroborated her husband’s testimony, identified the appellant, and told of having called the police after her escape from the store.

Officer Foster testified that he arrested the appellant sometime after the robbery in a red and black 1953 model Buick.

The appellant did not testify in his own behalf, but offered some witnesses whose testimony sought to raise the issue of alibi.

The jury resolved this disputed issue against the appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

We shall discuss the contentions raised in the appellant’s brief.

By bill of exception No. 1 the appellant complains of the refusal of the trial court to allow him to waive a jury and be tried before the court on his plea of not guilty. Appellant admits that the case of McMillan v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 583, 57 S.W.2d 125, holds against his contention but asks us to,, re-examine such holding and now hold that Articles 11 and 12, C.C.P., are unconstitutional in that they deprive him of his choice of being tried with or without a jury upon a plea of not guilty.

We have concluded that the Legislature had the right under the Constitution to provide that a jury should be impaneled to try all felonies where a plea of not guilty is entered. Burks v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 15, 165 S.W.2d 460.

We are not here confronted with the question of whether, a charge on circumstantial evidence should have been given because none was requested.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial-court is affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 29, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 29, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0035. RAFAEL PINZON v. AZHAR IDAN. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17A03944
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Condensed financial statements at November 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,260
<SECURITIES>                                    75,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,162
<PP&E>                                          22,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,437
<OTHER-SE>                                    (309,626)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,162
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        




<PAGE>



</TABLE>