alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Federal Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Federal Offshore Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in California (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 133    | 165    | 170    | 87     | 34     | 32     | 26     | 21    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 33     | 24     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2243 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2243

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Labor to publish on an Internet Web site certain information about the 
      number of veterans who are employed by Federal contractors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2011

 Mr. McNerney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Labor to publish on an Internet Web site certain information about the 
      number of veterans who are employed by Federal contractors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Employment Promotion Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF DATA ON EMPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN VETERANS BY 
              FEDERAL CONTRACTORS.

    Section 4212(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Secretary of Labor shall establish and maintain an 
Internet Web site on which the Secretary shall publicly disclose the 
information reported to the Secretary of Labor by contractors under 
paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-5809

 Directorate Identifier: 2015NM055AD

777-54-0026 --- 3/29/2011

777-54-0026, R1 --- 8/23/2011

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2240 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2240

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the exchange of land or interest in land between Lowell 
National Historical Park and the city of Lowell in the Commonwealth of 
                 Massachusetts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lowell National Historical Park Land 
Exchange Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    The Act entitled ``An act to provide for the establishment of the 
Lowell National Historical Park in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 
and for other purposes'' approved June 5, 1978 (Public Law 95-290; 16 
U.S.C. 410cc et seq.), is amended in section 202, by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(d)(1) The Secretary may exchange any land or interest in land 
within the boundaries of the park for any land or interest in land 
owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the city of Lowell, or the 
University of Massachusetts Building Authority.
    ``(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), an exchange under this 
subsection shall be subject to the laws, regulations, and policies 
applicable to exchanges of land administered by the National Park 
Service and any other terms and conditions that the Secretary 
determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the United 
States.
    ``(3) Where facilities or infrastructure required for the 
management and operation of the Lowell National Historical Park exists 
on the Federal land to be exchanged, and the non-Federal land or 
interest in land to be exchanged is not of equal value, the values 
shall be equalized by the payment of cash to the Secretary. The 
Secretary shall not be required to equalize the values of any exchange 
conducted under this subsection if the land or interest in land 
received by the Federal Government exceeds the value of the Federal 
land or interest in land exchanged.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2240

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the exchange of land or interest in land between Lowell 
National Historical Park and the city of Lowell in the Commonwealth of 
                 Massachusetts, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Oleg
Batratchenko, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





By: /S/ Oleg BatratchenkoOleg
      BatratchenkoPresident,
      CEODate:  May
      14, 2010
# NS J •'':-|V]T : NORTH S TAR J E T' i
.. > O 2-14-201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floo r RoomW12-14 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 T o Who m i t Ma yConcern : NorthstarJe t Inc
. herb ypetition s fo rexemptio n fro m Par t 12 0 o f Titl e 14 , Cod e o fFedera l Regulation s (1 4 CFR

) t o allo wNorthsta rJet , t o cove rit' s safet ysensitiv e employee s unde ron e dru g an d alcoho l testin g program . Northsta rJe t operate s a 1 4 CF R par t 14 5 Certificate d Repai rStatio n (Cert
. # NTB R 983G) , an d hold s a LO

A(LO A# P2VJR172 ) fo rsightseein g operations
. Du e t o th e smal l numbe ro femployee s (9 ) betwee n th e repai rstatio n an d th e sightseein g operation , NorthstarJe t i s face d wit h a n unnecessaryfinancia l hardshi p i n meetin g th e require d tw o separat e testin g program s a s on e woul d provid e th e sam e necessar yleve l o fsafety , whil e reducin g cos t an d unnecessarypaperwork
. Th e publi cwoul d b e benefite d b yreductio n o fredundan t administrativ e burde n a s a whole
. Simila rexemption s hav e bee n issue d fo rsmal l companie s suc h a s ours , wher e man ytype s o f function s ar e combine d du e t o smal l market s an d financia l constraints
. Respectfull ys Kyna n Sp ( thma n Genera l Manager Kynan@northstarmso.co m NorthstarJe t Inc
. 1 Corporat e Wa y Missoula , M T5980 8 Phone--(406 ) 721-888 6 Fax - (406 ) 721-882 8
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenaissancePharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                   | /s/ Kevin Rakin         |   |
|--------|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  | November 14, 2003 | Kevin Rakin             |
|   |                   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Gas Drilling 

wakeupsleepybear 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/01/2010 11:21 PM

Show Details 

I am a native and 59 year resident of Fort Worth, Texas. I cannot attend the meeting in Arlington, TX.

We used to have a very clean and livable city. The gas drillers have changed all of that, to the point I 

hate and fear living in a city I used to love. Almost within site of my house, there is a huge gas well 

processing plant, with lots of flares and exhaust pipes. I have severe heart and lung problems, have had 

heart and lung surgery, and have to use oxygen and regular breathing treatments to breath. I cannot 

financially afford to move, as my home is paid for, and I worry about the air I am breathing from this

plant, and others within just a few miles. Please do something, SOMETHING, to insure the air is safe 

coming from these drill sites and processing plants. Thank You, 

 Charles Robbins 5816 Hiett CT Fort Worth, TX 76112 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8782.h... 8/9/2010
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
 OF THE
 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION
 _______________________
 
 Under Section 242 of the
 General Corporation Law
 ______________________
 
 
 The undersigned, Mark D. Fischer, Senior Vice President of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify as follows:
 1.
The name of the Corporation is Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation.
 
 2.  The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed by the Secretary of State on April 8, 1976.
 
 3.  The purpose of this Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation is to change the Corporation’s name to “PVH Corp.”
 
 4.  The foregoing amendment is hereby effected by deleting Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof, the following:
 
 “FIRST:                      The name of the Corporation is PVH CORP.”
 
 5.  The foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation has been duly authorized and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
  
  
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Certificate and affirms under the penalties of perjury that the statements made herein are true, this 23rd day of June, 2011.
 
 
 
 Mark D. Fischer
 Mark D. Fischer, Senior Vice President
 
 
 ATTEST:
 
 
 
 Jeffrey S. Hellman
 Jeffrey S. Hellman, Assistant Secretary
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 11, 2015

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1336

Lower Tribunal No. 10-62992

________________



### Marbella Condominium Association Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.



### Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon

, Judge.

Danahy and Murray, P.A., and Michael A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellant.

Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenback (West Palm

Beach); Law Offices of Hoffman & Hoffman, P.A., and John D. Hoffman

, for

appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. See 1500 Coral Towers Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins.

Corp.

, 112 So. 3d 541, 544-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“Although the issue of

whether an insured has overcome the presumption of prejudice caused by late

notice is generally reserved for the trier of fact, it is appropriately raised on

summary judgment where, as in this case, the insured fails to present evidence

sufficient to rebut the presumption.”); Hope v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

, 114 So.

3d 457, 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding conclusory affidavits filed in response to

summary judgment motion failed “to rebut the presumption of prejudice to

Citizens where the passage of time has rendered Citizens unable to determine

exactly what current damage is directly attributable to Hurricane Wilma, and thus a

covered loss”).

2
Addendum #3 to Consulting Agreement

    This Addendum to Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into on January 1, 2019
        by and between Capstone Industries, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the “Company”), and George Wolf, (the “Consultant”), located at 7687 NW 127th Manor, Parkland, FL  33076.

    WHEREAS, on July 1, 2015, the Company and George Wolf entered into a Consulting Agreement (the
        “Consulting Agreement”) whereby George Wolf would provide Support to Sales & Marketing, Establish Protocol for a Global Sales Operation Function and Manage the Sales Operation Function for the Company, and the Consultant desires to perform such
        functions for the Company.

    This Agreement amends and modifies the Consulting Agreement as follows:

    
      	
              1.

            	
              Scope of
                      Work.

            


    

    Rate

            and Expenses.  The Company shall pay the Consultant the rate for the Services provided hereunder (the “Compensation”).

    
      	
              (a)

            	
              Provide
                      Support to Sales/Marketing

            


    

    
      	
              iii.

            	
              Will deal directly with specific retail accounts when requested by CEO

                  

            


    

    
      	
              2.

            	
              Compensation.

            


    

    

    

    
      	
              (a)

            	
              Rate and
                      Expenses.  The Company shall pay the Consultant the rate for the Services provided hereunder (the “Compensation”).

            


    

    
      	
               

            	
              January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2020 - $13,750.00, per month

            


    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

    WITNESS: COMPANY:

    ____________________________ ______________________________

    Name: Aimee C. Gaudet       Name: Stewart Wallach

    WITNESS: CONSULTANT:

    _____________________________ _______________________________

    Name: Bharati Patel              Name:
        George Wolf

    
      Capstone Industries, Inc.

      350 Jim Moran Blvd. Suite 120 Deerfield Beach, FL 33442

      

      

      Ph: (954)570-8889 | Fax: (954)252-3442 |

      www.capstoneindustries.com
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  June 9, 2011
 
 By:
/s/ Michael ShafferName:
Michael Shaffer

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6557
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROCKY D. SPENCER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-95-296-2) Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: January 28, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rocky D. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. David Glenn Barger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer , Nos. CR94-68; CA-95-296-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Bines, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on January 12, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing him to an indefinite term of imprisonment of *2V¿*to 5 years, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound *186by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-40340

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS LEON RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-96-CR-320-1

December 16, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Leon Ruiz appeals his sentence following a guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute a quantity

exceeding 100 kilograms of marihuana. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 2. Ruiz argues that the sentencing court
-2-

erred by failing to reduce his sentence for minor participation

under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 and by failing to apply the “safety valve”

provisions of § 5C1.2. A court's refusal to apply § 5C1.2 or §

3B1.2 is a factual finding that we review for clear error. See

United States v. Torres, 114 F.3d 520, 527 (5th Cir. 1997) (§

5C1.2); United States v. Lokey, 945 F.2d 825, 840 (5th Cir. 1991)

(§ 3B1.2). 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

hold that the district court did not clearly err in finding that

Ruiz was not a minor participant in the drug offense. See United

States v. Brown, 54 F.3d 234 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that “minor

participant” reduction only available when defendant is

“substantially less culpable” than the average participant). In

addition, the sentencing court did not err in determining that the

“safety valve” provisions of § 5C1.2 did not apply because Ruiz

possessed a firearm in connection with the offense. See U.S.S.G.

§ 5C1.2(2). Although a coconspirator’s possession of a weapon will

not affect a defendant’s eligibility for a § 5C1.2 reduction, the

“safety valve” will not apply if the defendant possessed the weapon

himself. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, comment. (n.4); United States v.

Wilson, 105 F.3d 219, 222 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the testimony

of Ruiz’s codefendant as well as Ruiz’s own testimony, the district

court found that Ruiz had physical contact with the weapons and

knew their location and obvious purpose. These findings are not
-3-

clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.