1 

Unopposed Motion to Extend time to Respond to Appellee’s Reply Brief 3.2.2015 

No. 04-14-00906-CV

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 

at SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

__________________________________________________________________ 

DAVID MAUK

Appellant 

v. 

Appellees 

PIPE CREEK WATER WELL, LLC and ROBERT RAE POWELL 

__________________________________________________________________ 

Cause No. 2013-CI-00386; Appeal from the 408th Judicial District Court, 

Bexar County, Texas 

__________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLANT, DAVID MAUK’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO APPELLEES’ REPLY BRIEF 

__________________________________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS: 

NOW COMES, Appellant, DAVID MAUK, and files his Unopposed Motion 

to Extend Deadline to Respond to Appellees’ Reply Brief and in support thereof 

would respectfully show the following: 

1. Appellees’ filed their Reply Brief on February 19, 2015. 

2. Appellant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ Response is twenty-one (21) days 

after the Reply Brief is filed, being Thursday, March 12, 2015. 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00906-cv

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/2/2015 5:21:09 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/2/2015 5:21:09 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2 

Unopposed Motion to Extend time to Respond to Appellee’s Reply Brief 3.2.2015 

3. Appellant respectfully requests an extension of time to reply due to the fact 

that Appellant’s counsel the lead attorney in this matter, is on vacation from March 

9, 2015 through March 13, 2015. 

4. Further Appellant’s counsel has a deadline of March 16, 2015 to file a 12b(6) 

Motion in response to Plaintiff’s Fist Amended Petition in a federal case styled Civil 

No. SA-14-CA-941-OLG, David Neill Jones v. Kerr County, Texas, Kerr County 

Sheriff’s Department, Officer Stephen Wherry, Officers John Doe, Kerrville Police 

Department, City of Kerrville; in the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Texas, San Antonio, Division. Also, Appellant’s counsel has other 

matters to conclude before his vacation, which will preclude diligence in researching 

and briefing the issues presented herein. 

5. Appellant, David Mauk, respectfully requests that the Court grant a seven (7) 

day extension for the reasons stated herein extending our deadline to March 19, 

2015. This Motion is not sought for delay but in the interest that proper attention 

can be given to adequately review Appellees’ Reply Brief and the exhibits tendered 

with said Reply and to prepare a Response to Appellees’ Reply Brief. 

6. Appellant conferred with Appellees’ counsel, Megan H. Kucera, on March 2, 

2015 and counsel is unopposed to this motion as it is not sought for the purpose of 

delay, but so that justice may be done. 
3 

Unopposed Motion to Extend time to Respond to Appellee’s Reply Brief 3.2.2015 

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant, David Mauk, hereby 

prays that the Court allow additional time and extend the deadline to reply to 

Appellees’ Response to Appellant’s Reply Brief. 

MCKAMIE KRUEGER, LLP 

941 Proton Road 

San Antonio, Texas 78258 

210.546.2122 

210.546.2130 

By: /s/ Adolfo Ruiz 

Adolfo Ruiz 

State Bar No. 17385600 

adolfo@mckamiekrueger.com 

Barbara L. Quirk 

State Bar No. 16436750 

barbara@mckamiekrueger.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, 

DAVID MAUK 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Appellant’s 

Deadline to Respond to Appellees’ Reply Brief was served on Appellees through 

counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure as 

indicated below on the March 2, 2015, addressed to: 

Keith P. Miller via E-Serve 

Megan Kucera 

Law Offices of Keith P. Miller, P.C. 

14350 Northbrook, Ste. 150 

San Antonio, Texas 78232 

/s/: Adolfo Ruiz 

ADOLFO RUIZ