alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2259 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2259

To require the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from operations 
                   in Libya, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2011

Mr. Heck (for himself, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, and Mrs. Miller of 
  Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from operations 
                   in Libya, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO WITHDRAW UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM 
              OPERATIONS IN LIBYA.

    (a) Congressional Finding.--Congress finds that the President 
failed to articulate a clear national security imperative for United 
States military actions in support of operations in Libya.
    (b) Withdrawal of Armed Forces.--The President shall withdraw the 
United States Armed Forces from operations in Libya not later than 30 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Limitation on Funds.--Funds available to the Department of 
Defense may not be used to conduct further operations in Libya, except 
for purposes of providing for the continued withdrawal of the United 
States Armed Forces from operations in Libya.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4472 

To reduce the travel expenses for certain Federal employees, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To reduce the travel expenses for certain Federal employees, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Spending 

5 Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TRAVEL 

7 COSTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, the total amount which is paid or reimbursed 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4472 IH

1 by an agency under subchapter I and II of chapter 57 

2 of title 5, United States Code, may not— 

3 (1) for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014, ex4 ceed 50 percent of the total amount so paid or reim5 bursed by such agency for fiscal year 2012; and 

6 (2) for fiscal year 2015, exceed 75 percent of 

7 the total amount so paid or reimbursed by such 

8 agency for fiscal year 2012. 

9 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the begin10 ning of each of fiscal years 2014 through 2016, the head 

11 of each agency shall submit a report to the Committee 

12 on Oversight and Government Reform in the House of 

13 Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

14 and Governmental Affairs of the Senate with respect to 

15 the total travel expenses paid or reimbursed under such 

16 subchapters by such agency during the preceding fiscal 

17 year. Such report shall include a list of dates, locations, 

18 and costs of such travel. 

19 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

20 term ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given that term under 

21 section 5701(1) of title 5, United States Code, but does 

22 not include the following: 

23 (1) The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

24 and Explosives. 

25 (2) The Department of Defense. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4472 IH

1 (3) The Drug Enforcement Administration. 

2 (4) The Federal Air Marshal Service. 

3 (5) The Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

4 (6) The United States Capitol Police. 

5 (7) The United States Citizenship and Immi6 gration Services. 

7 (8) The United States Secret Service. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2007,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended January 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of 51147,                Inc. |

| **51147,                INC.**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| By:                /s/ Michael A.                Zahorik                                     |
| Michael                A. ZahorikChief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer                                                                                                                                                                  |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15573-15574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04518]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS24-07]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of special closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 15574]]

    Description: In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.
    Location: Virtual meeting via Webex.
    Date: February 28, 2024.
    Time: 11 a.m. ET.

Action and Discussion Item

Personnel Matter

    The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel 
matter. No action was taken by the ASC.

James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-04518 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
NOTICE

1273240 NO. 74208

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 149TH DISTRICT COURT

VS. OF

BRODRICK MICHAEL JAMES BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL

ON THE 28TH day of JANUARY, 2015, the defendant in the above styled and

numbered cause excepted to the order of the Court i n said cause and gave Notice of Appeal to

the Court of Appeals, FIRST Judicial District.

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 1/28 /15

Date of Sentencing: 1/28/15

Name of Trial Court Judge: TERRI HOLDER

Name of Court Reporter: ROBIN RIOS

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: KEITH ALLEN (APPOINTED) 2360 CR 94, SUITE 106 PEARLAND, TEXAS 77584

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appea l: Jeri Yenne, District Attorney Brazoria County Courthouse 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A Angleton, TX 77515

Defendant Incarcerated? YES

Motion for New Trial Filed? NO

Appeal Bond: NO Date N/A

Offense and Punishment: DELIVERY OF A CONTROLLED S UBSTANCE - ENHANCED; FORTY FIVE (45) YEARS

RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk

By /S/ KATHLEEN MCDOUGALD Deputy
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARV A. HUBBARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1753

[August 30, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-009350-CF-10A.

Marv A. Hubbard, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 4.38**[Confidential Treatment]**Addendum No. 1 to the bareboat charter dated 20 April 2004 between NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. ascharterers and Ocean Dream Limited as owners in relation to the vessel named “MV Norwegian Dream”(the “Charter”)**1. The parties have agreed that the Charter Period set out in box 21 of the Charter shallbe amended to read “The Vessel shall be redelivered between [**] [Confidential Treatment]”.2. Save as expressly provided by this Addendum No. 1, all other terms and conditions ofthe Charter shall remain unamended and in full force and effect.Mark E. Warren
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Brian Staveley 

133 Palmetto Lane 

Largo, FL 33770 

Dear Mr. Staveley: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 16, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2281), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/11

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kramont Realty Trust (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl E.
Kraus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Carl E. Kraus
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Carl E. Kraus
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      Kramont Realty Trust
                                      November 4, 2004

                                       28
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of ev3 Inc.
 State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or
    
    Name UnderName
    
    Organization
    
    Which Does BusinessMicro Therapeutics, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    ev3 NeurovascularMicro Therapeutics International, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/ADendron GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    N/Aev3 Endovascular, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    ev3 Inc.ev3 Peripheral, Inc.
    
    Minnesota
    
    N/Aev3 International, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/Aev3 B.V.
    
    Netherlands
    
    N/Aev3 K.K.
    
    Japan
    
    N/Aev3 S.r.l.
    
    Italy
    
    N/Aev3 Australia Pty Limited
    
    Australia
    
    N/Aev3 Canada, Inc.
    
    Canada
    
    N/Aev3 SAS
    
    France
    
    N/Aev3 Europe SAS
    
    France
    
    N/Aev3 GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    N/Aev3 Technologies Iberica, S.L.
    
    Spain
    
    N/Aev3 Nordic AB
    
    Sweden
    
    N/Aev3 Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    N/Aev3 Comércio de Produtos Endovasculares do Brazil Ltda
    
    Brazil
    
    N/Aev3 Medical Devices (Beijing) Company, Ltd.
    
    China
    
    N/AFoxHollow Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/Aev3 Sp. z o.o
    
    Poland
    
    N/Aev3 Singapore Pte Ltd
    
    Singapore
    
    N/A
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Diabetes Applications Open- and Closed-Loop Platforms.                    

*Date:*                         March 26, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7015, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721,                         *ryan.morris@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 21, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-03913 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
CASCADIA CAPITAL CORPORATIONSuite 800 - 50 West Liberty Street
Reno, Nevada
89501

September 6, 2002

DKJ TECHNOLOGIES INC.("DKJ") and

STORAGE ALLIANCE INC. ("SAI")

725, 435 4th Avenue S.W.

Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 3A8

Dear Mr. Ascah

Re: Closing Date for Share Exchange with DKJ and SAI shareholders

Further to our agreement dated August 9th, 2002, (the "Agreement") we are writing to confirm that the closing date of September 6, as set out in clause 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby extended until 5:00 p.m. pacific standard time, on September 27, 2002.

To confirm your agreement to the above terms, kindly sign two copies of this letter signifying your approval and acceptance and return one fully executed letter to the writer at your earliest convenience.

Yours truly,

CASCADIA CAPITAL CORPORATION
			Per:
			/s/ signed
			Authorized Signatory

The undersigned hereby agree to the foregoing terms and conditions of this agreement as of the date first above written.

|DKJ TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Per:	/s/ signed
Authorized Signatory | STORAGE ALLIANCE INC.
Per:	/s/ signedAuthorized Signatory
|---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CYOP Systems International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon
A. Samson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Gordon A. Samson

Gordon A. Samson
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence School Corporation, Appellant, v Joel J. Morris, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Hewlett Bay Park, et al., Respondents, and Edwin Wegman et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Hewlett Bay Park, dated December 3, 1988, which revoked a building permit previously granted to the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated April 5, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the resettled judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

As a general rule, a court is constrained to decide cases on the law as it exists at the time of the decision *(see, Matter of Temkin v Karagheuzoff,*34 NY2d 324, 329; *Matter of Alscot Investing Corp. v Incorporated Vil. of Rockville Centre,*99 AD2d 754, *affd*64 NY2d 921). The Supreme Court correctly considered a zoning amendment adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Hewlett Bay Park (hereinafter the Village) prior to the entry of judgment. The amendment prohibits the alteration, expansion, or enlargement of preexisting nonconforming uses, thereby negating the petitioner’s right to build two swimming pools on its premises.

Municipalities have been estopped from applying zoning amendments to property owners only in those instances where *468vested rights have been acquired or where some form of misconduct or extraordinary delay on the part of the municipality has prevented the acquisition of such rights *(see, Cymbidium Dev. Corp. v Smith,*133 AD2d 605, 606; *Matter of Faymor Dev. Co. v Board of Stds. & Appeals,*45 NY2d 560). The petitioner acknowledges that it did not acquire vested rights to build two swimming pools on its premises. Rather the petitioner contends that the Village’s illegal actions in revoking the permit and then adopting the zoning amendment prevented it from acquiring such rights.

We agree with the Supreme Court that this case does not present a "special facts” exception under which the Village could be estopped from applying the zoning amendment to the petitioner. Although the Supreme Court did find prior to the adoption of the zoning amendment, that the Village had arbitrarily and capriciously revoked the building permit previously granted to the petitioner under the preexisting zoning ordinance, there is no indication in the record that the revocation of the permit was illegal *(cf., Matter of Temkin v Karagheuzoff, supra),*the product of malice, oppression, manipulation, corruption, bad faith, or a method of delaying the petitioner from acquiring vested rights while the zoning amendment was under consideration *(cf., Matter of Pokoik v Silsdorf,*40 NY2d 769, 772-773; *see, Matter of Aversano v Two Family Use Bd.,*117 AD2d 665). Sullivan, J. P., Harwood, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.