alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William Garrahan, Senior Vice President and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 10, 2004 /s/   William GarrahanWilliam GarrahanSenior Vice President and Acting Chief Financial 
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 32
OFFICE OF THE GovERNOR December 23, 2011 RICK PERRY GOVERNOR

Alfredo "Al"Armendariz, Ph.D. Regional Administrator, Region 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 RE: Proposed Listing ofthe Circle Court Ground Water Site on the FederalNational Priorities List (NPL) Dear Dr. Armendariz: Uponthe recommendation from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Texas supports EPA's decisionthatthe Circle Court Groundwater Site (CCGS)be considered as a candidate site for the federal NPL cleanup. A plume oftrichloroethene was discovered in the CCGS in March 2006 during a routine monitoring check by TCEQ, and since then TCEQ has been monitoring and addressing the issues on this site. TCEQ believes thatthis site is eligible for the proposedNPL listing based onEPA and TCEQ evaluations ofthe site under the federal Hazard Ranking System. Sincerely, 

# tl_ut.j)eR.R3
Rick Perry Governor RP:tzp

cc: BryanW. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman, TCEQ Mark R. Vickery, P.G., Executive Director, TCEQ Mr. BrentWade, Deputy Director, Office ofWaste, TCEQ Ms. Beth Seaton, Director, RemediationDivision, TCEQ Mr. Sam Coleman, Superfund DivisionDirector, EPA Ms. Wren Stenger, Superfund Associate Director, EPA Mr. John Meyer, ChiefRisk and Site Assessment, EPA Ms. BrendaNixon Cook, Region 6, NPL Coordinator, EPA
PoST OFFicE Box 12428 AusTIN, TEXAS 78711 (512)463-2000 (VOICE)/DIAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES VIsiT www.TEXASONUNE.COM TIIE OFFICIAL WEB SnE OF TilE STATE OF TEXAS
11-i 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11-1

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH.................................................................................................. 11-1
11-1 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups 

or customers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy efficiency standard 

level. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses for 

the notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the LCC and 

payback periods (PBPs) for those customers who fall into identifiable affected groups. DOE 

plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices and variations in energy use that might 

affect the net present value of a standard to customer subpopulations. To the extent possible, 

DOE will obtain estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability 

in its calculation of customer impacts. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to consider 

how differences in energy use will affect subgroups of customers. 

DOE will determine the impact on customer subgroups using the LCC spreadsheet 

model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC and PBP analysis (described in 

the preliminary technical support document (TSD) chapter 8) focuses on all business and 

institutional users of automatic commercial ice makers. DOE can use the LCC spreadsheet model 

to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. Model inputs used by 

DOE to determine LCC and PBPs are described in detail in the LCC and PBP analysis (see 

preliminary TSD chapter 8). 

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH

DOE will use the LCC spreadsheet model to evaluate impacts on consumer subgroups, 

especially small business customers. DOE can analyze the LCC for any subgroup by applying 

the LCC spreadsheet model to only that subgroup within individual regions. DOE is particularly 

sensitive to increases in the consumer price of the considered products, wishing to avoid a 

negative economic impact on any identified consumer subgroup with limited capacity to absorb 

price increases. The impacts on subgroups will be compared to impacts on the overall 

population.
# S T A T E OF O H I O C E R T I F I C A T E Ohio Secretary of State, Jon Husted 2390423 It is hereby certified that the Secretary of State of Ohio has custody of the business records for
and, that said business records show the filing and recording of: AERIAL ANTHROPOLOGY LLC

United States of America State of Ohio Office of the Secretary of State 

### Witness my hand and the seal of the Secretary of State at Columbus, Ohio this 6th day of May, A.D. 2015.

Ohio Secretary of State 201511801883 DOMESTIC FOR PROFIT LLC - ARTICLES OF ORG Document(s) Document No(s): THOMAS PATRICK DAVIS 4702 GRACE RD NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070 This is not a bill. Please do not remit payment. DATE 05/06/2015 DOCUMENT ID 201511801883 DOMESTIC FOR PROFIT LLC - ARTICLES OF ORG (LCP) DESCRIPTION FILING 125.00 EXPED 0.00 PENALTY 0.00 CERT 0.00 COPY 0.00 

### Receipt

Effective Date:04/28/2015
| 1. | The      Due Date on the Note is extended for a period of three months and the      entire balance shall be due and payable in accordance with the Terms of      the said Note on or before June 30, 2009, unless there is a Default that      entitles the Lender to be paidearlier. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      Borrower agrees to pay a fee of $5,000 for this Extension upon the signing      hereof. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Interest      shall be paid monthly on the 1st of each month commencing May 1,      2009. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Borrower      agrees that it is not entitled to any further disbursements under the Loan      Agreement and that Lender and Walker have in all respects fully complied      with their respective obligations under the terms of the Loan Agreement      and Note. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | In      the event borrower receives any equity financing, including the issue of      Preferred Stock in any form, the entire outstanding Principal and interest      shall become immediately due andpayable. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | In      all respects the terms and conditions and other provisions of the Loan      Agreement and Note are hereby confirmed and shall continue to apply until      such time as the Principal and interest have been  repaid. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BORROWER:      AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL INC                                              | LENDER:      WLOANS LLC |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| /s/      H. MacGregor Clarke     Chief      Financial Officer | /s/      Jack J. Walker |
|  CO-BORROWER      (FNB LOAN):                                                     |                    |
| /s/      JACK J. WALKER                                                                |                    |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-503
WALLACE SPENCER DAVIS, Petitioner, versus MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA BOARD OF CORRECTIONS;RON ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON, Department Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Security, Virginia Department of Corrections; DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Treatment, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondents.
On Petition for Permission to Appeal. (CA-96-13-R)

No. 96-513
WALLACE SPENCER DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA BOARD OF CORRECTIONS;RON ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON, Department Director, Virginia Department of Corrections;2 DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Security, Virginia Department of Corrections; DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Treatment, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-13-R) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. No. 96-503 petition denied and No. 96-513 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wallace Spencer Davis, Appellant Pro Se. James Stuart Gilmore, III, Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In No. 96-503, Davis petitions this court for permission to appeal from the district court's order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of a Department of Corrections policy limiting the amount of property inmates can keep in their cells. We deny the petition because the denial of a temporary restraining order is not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976).Even if Davis attempts to appeal the denial of a preliminary injunction, we find no abuse of discretion. See Direx Israel Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp. , 952 F.2d 802, 812-13 (4th Cir. 1991).In No. 96-513, Davis appeals the district court's order denying his renewed motion for a temporary restraining order. Thus, we dismiss the appeal based on the same reasoning. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-503 - PETITION DENIED No. 96-513 - DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.367

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169450 dated January 19, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

intra zonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until January 19, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 18, 2018 No. 735-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 156 ) IV-E-2 9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56

PM Sheet 156 of 242P. 2 I " 

# k UNITE D STATE S EN V IRO N MENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5

, 

### MA R 

### I 1988 1 OFFIC E O F , AI R AN O RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT :

FROM : TO : THRU : EPA/Lora l System s Grou p Meeting Regarding Bladde r Tank s Jea n Schwendeman , Mechanica l Enginee r M/j!iiA/Vf l "%f* L 1 Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h jJ^ ' \~r^ 

# ,^e4^ ^ 

# f Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 Glenn W . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Enginee r JZWA*V»\ . W ^UAU* ^ Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Cheste r J . France , Chie f Standard s Developmen t a Branc h On January20 , 198 8 representative s o f EPA' s Offic e o f Mobil e Source s me t wit h th e staf f o f Lora l System s Group , a fue l cel l manufacturer , i n Rockmart , Georgia . Th e purpos e o f EPA' s bladde r tan

k projec t an

d t o possibl e materials , design s an d manufacturin g capability . A n attendee s lis t i s attached . th e meeting wa s obtai n Loral' s t o discus s

idea s o n EP Aexplaine d th e nee d fo r contro l o f refueling emission s a s describe d i n the recen t NPRM . EP Aals o state d our vie wtha t i n th e longe r ter mcollapsibl e bladder s coul d provid e a n alternativ e contro l technolog yfo r bot h refueling an d evaporativ e emission s an d coul d als o provid e safet ybenefits . EP Apresente d some design idea s an d explaine d the testing whic h had bee n accomplishe d t o date . Lora l discusse d the automotiv e bladde r developmen t wor k the yhav e don e i n the pas t for the majo r aut o companies . Thi s include d a fairl yextensiv e amoun t o f testing i n th e earl y 1970' s t o develo p bot h crash-resistan t bladder s an d bladder s designe d fo r emissio n contro l purposes . Theyprovide d EPAwit h some confidentia l photo s o f thes e design s an d copie s o f thei r tes t results . Lora l suggeste d usin g a nitrile/PV

C blen d possibl ylaminate d wit h a nylo n barrie r film . Theyals oP. 3

suggeste d a ^ "floating-roof " typ e design , whic h woul d basicall y be a diaphrag

mwithi n th e tan

k whic h woul d floa t on the surfac e o f the fuel. ! Lora l estimate d tha t theycoul d be set-u p t o manufactur e bladder s wit h a s littl e a s a si x mont h lea d time , depending on productio n volume . Theyals o state d tha t overhead ,an d labo r cost s mayhav e a greate r effec t on th e cos t o f a finishe d bladde r than the bladde r materia l itsel f does . Attachmen tP. 4

EPA/LORA

L Meeting January20 , 198 8 Glenn Passavan t EP A Jea n Schwendema n EPA Keit h Robinso n Lora l Bo b Sutto n Lora l Bil l Duval l Lora l
Monday’s front page presented a stark example of how we have drifted off course as a society 

and how our lawmakers have lost their bearings when it comes to spending our tax dollars.

On the same page that carried a story about the efforts of volunteers with the Charlestown 

Community Garden working to feed families in need, we had a story indicating the Rhode Island 

Airport Corporation was working to provide a $900,000 state-guaranteed loan to a Massachusetts 

airline so it could provide more convenient service between Block Island and larger airports.

Where to begin?

The community garden, started from a Boy Scout project, is a 9,500-square-foot plot of land that 

provides fresh produce to four organizations — the Charlestown Senior Center, the Jonnycake 

Center of Westerly, St. Andrew Lutheran Church, and the Rhode Island Center Assisting Those 

in Need. Volunteer Susie Fehrmann, who heads the project, said she knows personally of the vital 

role such an effort can play in the lives of people in need.

“I had a period in my life when I was hungry, and I had to depend on other people. Somebody 

did that for me; I have to do that for people in this community and this area that don’t have 

anything. And it’s way worse now,” she said.

We have written often of how it’s “way worse now,” including as recently as least week, when we 

noted that local social service agencies are experiencing an increase in demand for food as 

donations of food are decreasing. Even the state-run food bank has less food to provide to the local 

agencies. The economy continues to bring once comfortable families into a new and ugly reality 

that leads them to become a statistic on the ledger sheets of our social service agencies.

Meanwhile, we’ve got the Rhode Island Airport Corporation applying for a $900,000 federal 

grant to give a private airline financial backing to add service between TF Green Airport in 

Warwick and Block Island from spring through fall. The objective: more convenience between the 

island and larger airlines that fly into and out of Green. The island is now served by New England 

Airlines of Westerly, which has provided service for the past 40 years. In the Block Island Times 

story that we carried about the issue, there was no one complaining about the status quo or 

calling for this new service. So we’re hoping to give a state-backed loan to an out-of-state company 

rather than helping an existing business? Why does that sound familiar?

You get a sense that RIAC and the federal Department of Transportation are looking for 

reasons to further justify their existence when no one is seeking their help in this case, while the 

federal agencies that provide food aid to the poor are scrambling and still failing to meet the basic 

needs of those screaming for help.

Airline service between the mainland and Block has been fine for decades. RIAC and the federal 

DOT need to cancel the grant request and instead let the Rhode Island Food Bank know there’s 

$900,000 in federal money burning a hole in some bureaucrat’s pocket. 

This is nothing short of ludicrous.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
May 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132682 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JIMMIE L. MURRY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132682 COA: 268909 Washtenaw CC: 04-000900-NI B. J. YUCHASZ and JILL KULHANEK, Defendants-Appellants,

and
JANE DOE, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the Court of Appeals dissent.

C AVANAGH , J., not participating, due to a fam ilial relationship with counsel of record.

s0508 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 11, 2007
Clerk
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0218

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SH ANE THOMAS PELLETIER,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Gregory G. Pinski , Di strict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 27 2020

05/27/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0218
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3171

_____________________________

A. L. G., A child

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Susanne Wilson Bullard, Judge.

February 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Emmalyn Dalton, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**UNDER
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the filing by AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of
      its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the
      “Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, W. Michael
      Bissonnette, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)          
      The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)          
      The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date:    June
                29, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                W. Michael BissonnetteW.
                Michael BissonnetteChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
Exhibit 4.325

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 161222 dated May 07, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 07, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 26, 2017 No. 799-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov

 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296