alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and
Co-Chief Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our
respective knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

|                      |  |                                    
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|October 31, 2003
Date |  | /s/ William R. Cruz
William R. Cruz
|                      |  | Co-Chairman of the Board           
|                      |  | and Co-Chief Executive Officer     

|                      |  |                                
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|October 31, 2003
Date |  | /s/ Ralph L. Cruz
Ralph L. Cruz
|                      |  | Co-Chairman of the Board       
|                      |  | and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersigned officers of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies that:

 

| (1) | the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |           |   |   |                                                                |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | April 3,  2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Wayne A. Schellhammer                                           |
|   |           |   |   | Wayne A. Schellhammer

Chief Executive Officer                      |
|   |           |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | April 3,  2007 |   | By:    | /s/ David S. Boone                                                  |
|   |           |   |   | David S. Boone

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           |   |   |                                                                |
| Date:  | April 3,  2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Steven M. Phillips                                              |
|   |           |   |   | Steven M. Phillips

Controller and Principal

Accounting Officer    |
|   |           |   |   |                                                                |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-125694) pertaining to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of our report dated June 24, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 
 SPIELMAN KOENIGSBERG & PARKER, LLP
 
 
 June 24, 2011
#### Deberry WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27132.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty.,; Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the offense of burglary; the penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of six years.

The notice of appeal found in the transcript consists only of a docket entry thereof. It is the well-recognized law in , this state that notice of appeal must be given in open court and entered on the minutes of the court. Merely a notation on the cburt’s docket is not sufficient. See Clark v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 210, and many cases there cited. ■

*116In the absence of a proper notice of appeal in the record, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12350]

# SUMMARY:

The Department of State announces the meeting of the U.S. State Department's Overseas Security Advisory Council.

# DATES:

March 29, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ellen K. Tannor, Overseas Security Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2223 email:                         *TannorE@state.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1009), the meeting will be open to the public. The open session is expected to be held virtually from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. eastern time on March 29, 2024. Members of the public who wish to attend must RSVP to the Designated Federal Officer, Ellen Tannor, at                     *osacadmin@state.gov*                     not later than March 22, 2024, and will receive instructions on how to access the virtual meeting. Requests for reasonable accommodation should also be made at that time. Request made after March 22 will be considered but might be possible to fulfill.                

The meeting will focus on examining the Private-Public Partnership process to explore how this construct may align with future collaborative strategic objectives.

                        (Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1001*et seq.*                         and 5 U.S.C. 552)                    

Ellen K. Tannor,

Designated Federal Officer, Overseas Security Advisory Council, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-04485 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
lOOd

Fourth of Court Of Appeals

San Antonio Texas

Octot^er 6 2015

04-15-00440-CV

Trial Court No 15-241-CCL

Joo Gonicx n Janle Gomez

POtk»x83

Con^fortTexas 78013

Thomas Dasheiell

143 Spanish Pass Road

Boeme Texas 78006

Statement In response to Court order Our Mostsinceiest apolo^esfor

faUiio to filo Our briefstatement Wo did not receive a court order to filea brief Byset

tfcito Wo have t>een verybusyfinding a place to live And where homeless fOr twoweeKS

all Iho stress of this move And had no excessto Internet orfoxing We smcerely

aiX^OQi^o to the Court

""085:80 5102 5 W

Sincer^y

Joe n Janie Gomez

T
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert F. Kirk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.





By:
/s/ Robert F. KirkRobert F. KirkChief Executive OfficerDate: November 3, 2009

(Principal Executive Officer)







I, Elias A. MurrayMetzger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.





By:
/s/ Elias A. MurrayMetzgerElias A. MurrayMetzgerChief Financial OfficerDate: November 3, 2009

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANA MORRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:16-cr-00004-AWA-RJK-1)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Morris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dana Morris appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reconsider a 

prior order denying Morris’s motion to amend the restitution order that was entered as 

part of her criminal sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Morris, No. 4:16-cr-00004-AWA-RJK-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2018). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “annual report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:




1.         the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.         the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 16, 2011




/s/ Amos NetzerName: Amos NetzerTitle: Chief Executive Officer/s/ Yagen MosheName: Yagen MosheTitle: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS 10-Q REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-04-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                        $ 50,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,088
<INVENTORY>                                    244,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               431,533
<PP&E>                                         106,268<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 679,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,217
<BONDS>                                        248,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,290
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   679,449
<SALES>                                        310,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,310
<CGS>                                          204,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,911)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
<FN>
<F1>Property, plant and equipment is presented net of accumulated depreciation.
<F2>Provision for doubtful accounts is included in other costs and expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-148095), and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-140669) of our report dated June 30, 2008, relating to our audits of the
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Ivivi Technologies,
Inc. (the "Corporation") included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.


/S/ RAICH ENDE MALTER & CO. LLP

East Meadow, New York
June 30, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4447 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4447

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain acrylic staple 
                                fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain acrylic staple 
                                fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain acrylic staple 
fibers) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 97-30139 & 97-30961 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY OCHSNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC Nos. 95-CV-3978-N & 89-CR-220-N

- - - - - - - - - -

March 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Ochsner, federal prisoner # 19267-077, appeals from

the district court’s denials of his motions to vacate, set aside,

or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and for

reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582. Ochsner

argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his

conviction for using and carrying a firearm in relation to a

drug-trafficking offense in light of the Supreme Court’s decision

in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995); that his
No. 97-30139

No. 97-30961

-2-

firearms conviction violated principles of double jeopardy

because it was based upon a 21 U.S.C. § 846 conspiracy

conviction; and that the district court abused its discretion by

denying his motion for reduction of sentence because U.S.S.G.

§ 2D1.1 did not apply to his case. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgments are

AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States of America v. Ochsner, No. 89-220 (E.D.

La. Jan. 8, 1997); United States of America v. Ochsner, No. 89-

220 (E.D. La. Aug. 28, 1997).
Exhibit 4.320

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 161217 dated May 07, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

data communication services excluding data communication services for the purposes of voice data communication

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 07, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 26, 2017 No. 799-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here 

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-008:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlb OF MONTANA

DA 20-0172

SHANELLE J. VAN DYKE,

Petitioner and Appellee,

v.

DAVID ALLEN WARD,

Respondent and Appellant.

FILED

MAR 2 6 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Pursuant to Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DATED this day of March, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

03/27/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0172
#### HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 11, 1955.

Shumate & Shumate, Irvine, for appellant.

C. E. Rice, Jr., Lexington, E. B. Rose, Beattyville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment denying appellant, Home Insurance Company, the right to recover on its subrogation agreement the sum of $226 from appellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. The lower court directed a verdict for ap-pellee. We have read the pleadings, the evidence and the briefs and we conclude the evidence fully sustains the action of the trial judge.

The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
#### POTTS v. POTTS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 19, 1954.

Allen Schmitt, Louisville, for appellant.

Crawford, Jull & Gentry, Richard B. Crawford, Louisville, for appellee.

*115PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment awarding defendant below accrued installments of $750 for the support of the children of the parties litigant. Plaintiff contended defendant was estopped to collect the installments because she violated the custody order by removing the children from the court’s jurisdiction, making them unavailable to plaintiff for stipulated visitation privileges. The evidence amply supports the chancellor’s finding that the removal was of a temporary nature and under the circumstances did not violate the custody order.

The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.