alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ACTION:

 Notice.

The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

*Title, Form Number, and OMB Number:*                     Technical Assistance for Public Participation (TAPP) Application; DD Form 2749; OMB Number 0704-0392.                

*Type of Request:*                     Extension.                

*Number of Respondents:*                     265.                

*Responses per Respondent:*                     1.                

*Annual Responses:*                     265.                

*Average Burden per Response:*                     4 hours.                

*Annual Burden Hours:*                     1,060.                

*Needs and Uses:*                     The collection of information is necessary to identify products or services requested by community members of restoration advisory boards or technical review committees to aid in their participation in the Department of Defense's environmental restoration program, and to meet Congressional reporting requirements. Respondents are community members of restoration advisory boards or technical review committees requesting technical assistance to interpret scientific and engineering issues regarding the nature of environmental hazards at an installation. This assistance will aid communities in participating in the cleanup process. The information, directed by 10 U.S.C. 2705, will be used to determine the eligibility of the proposed  project, begin the procurement process to obtain the requested products or services, and determine the satisfaction of community members of restoration advisory boards and technical review committees receiving the products and services.                

*Affected Public:*                     Not-For-Profit Institutions.                

*Frequency:*                     On occasion.                

*Respondent's Obligation:*                     Voluntary.                

*OMB Desk Officer:*                     Mr. Edward C. Springer.                

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

*DOD Clearance Officer:*                     Mr. Robert Cushing.                

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

Dated: November 22, 1999.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-2441 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Liankuan Yang Name: Liankuan Yang Title: Chief Executive Officer  Dated: November 19, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 26815.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 17, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted as a third offender for violating,the liquor law in Scurry County, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $2500.

All proceedings appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented- for review.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

WOODLEY, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant for the first time contends that he was deprived of his constitutional rights because of discrimination in the selection of the jury panel.

Except for the allegations of the motion filed in this court, there is nothing in the record to show that appellant is a Negro, and nothing to show that there were no Negroes on the jury panel or on the jury which tried him.

*140It is made to appear that no statement of facts or bills of exception have been filed in the trial court and none appear in the record.

In the absence of a statement of facts in regard to the jury question raised, or on the question of guilt or innocence, nothing is before us for review on this appeal.

Appellant's motion for rehearing is overruled.
---

---

Exhibit 15.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference by Shamir Optical industry Ltd. (Shamir) to its Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-137628 and 333-145945), relating to
Shamirs Israeli Plan for the Allotment of Shares/Options for 2003, Stock Option
Grant dated June 5, 2000, and 2005 General Share and Incentive Plan, of our report dated
June 26, 2008, with respect to Shamirs consolidated financial statements, which are
included in Shamirs Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2007,
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|                 |                                                                     
|---------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | /s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay and KasiererKOST, FORER, GABBAY and KASIERER
|June 26, 2008    | A member of Ernst & Young Global                                    



---

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-276

_____________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW JOSEPH KENWORTHY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

April 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4432 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4432

      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Flutolanil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Flutolanil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUTOLANIL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.82 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Flutolanil) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)       
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History:                                        
|                                                     
|Wyoming Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Wyoming Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 266,751 | 266,038 | 264,863 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2292 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2292

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2011

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE'S 
              BENEFITS FOLLOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR RECEIPT 
              OF SPOUSE'S BENEFITS.

    (a) Wife's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced 
wife--'' and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and 
inserting ``divorced wife meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 
through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (b) Husband's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced husband--'' 
and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and inserting 
``divorced husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through 
(D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (c) Exemption From Deductions on Account of Work.--Section 
203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 403(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2)(A) Except as'' and all that follows 
        through ``the benefit to which'' and inserting the following: 
        ``(2) In any case in which any of the other persons referred to 
        in paragraph (1)(B) is entitled to monthly benefits as a 
        divorced spouse under subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for 
        any month, the benefit to which''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
benefits for months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of
TradeStation Group, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. May 5, 2004

Date
    
    By:  /s/ Ralph L. Cruz
Ralph L. Cruz
Co-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Louisiana--North Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Louisiana--North Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 18     | 42    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 28     | 16     | 14     | 11     | 17     | 14     | 11     | 9      | 8     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 45     | 30     | 13     | 12     | 17     | 18     | 10     | 5      | 3      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 3      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15 ,

2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00727- CV

TRIANGLE CAPITAL PROPERTIES, LLC, ROYAL TEXAS, LLC, BAH TEXAS, LLC, MOHAMMED HADI RAHMAN, YESENIA ZUMAYA, CAJUN GLOBAL, LLC, AND CAJUN OPERATING COMPANY, Appellants
V.
ERICA MICHELLE ACEVE DO , Appellee
On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-16506

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order signed August 22, 2017. On May 4, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby.
June 3, 2015

Mr. Cole Moon California Surveying & Drafting Supply

4733 Auburn Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95841

Dear Mr. Moon:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 8, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1377), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure