alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0618 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AUSTIN TYLER JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 15, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening br ief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2022

07/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0618
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ev3Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James M. Corbett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 6, 2006 | /s/  James M. Corbett                  |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                 | James  M. Corbett                      |
|                 | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | (principal  executive officer)         |

 

----
#### REDDICK v. STATE.

No. 23451.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 30, 1946.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon an indictment charging an assault 'with intent to murder with malice, appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and her punishment was assessed «at a fine of $100.

The record is before this court without any bills of exception. No complaints were made of the court’s charge, and no special charges were requested by appellant. Therefore, the only question presented for our consideration is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Without setting out the facts in detail, we deem them sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Utah Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Utah (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Utah Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Utah (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 11,092 | 10,935 | 13,005 | 10,975 | 9,295  | 7,978  | 8,480  | 7,097 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6,375  | 6,250  | 7,579  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 10.3

                      AMENDMENT TO AMERICAN STORES COMPANY
                     1985 STOCK OPTION AND STOCK AWARD PLAN
                           DATED AS OF OCTOBER 8, 1998

                  The American  Stores Company 1985 Stock Option and Stock Award
Plan (the "1985 Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

                  1. The proviso to the first sentence of the third paragraph of
Section  18(a) of the 1985 Plan is hereby  amended  to read in its  entirety  as
follows:

         ; provided,  that if any right granted  pursuant to this sentence would
         make  a  Change  in  Control  transaction  ineligible  for  pooling  of
         interests  accounting  under APB No. 16 that is intended to be eligible
         for such accounting treatment, (i) the Committee shall have the ability
         to substitute  the cash payable  pursuant to this paragraph with common
         stock with a fair market  value equal to the cash that would  otherwise
         be  payable  hereunder,  (ii) the  period  for the holder to elect such
         right  shall  terminate  as of the  close  of  business  on the date of
         consummation of such Change of Control transaction and (iii) the Change
         of Control  Fair Market  Value shall be adjusted to provide the holders
         of such  rights with fair value in exchange  for any  reduction  in the
         period for such  election as  determined  by the  Committee in its sole
         judgment.

                  2. The fourth  paragraph of Section  18(a) of the 1985 Plan is
hereby  amended by inserting  the words "(or such  shorter  period as the rights
granted  pursuant  to  the  previous  paragraph  are  exercisable)"  after  each
reference to "60-day period."

                  3. The last  paragraph  of  Section  18(a) of the 1985 Plan is
hereby  amended by inserting the words ", subject to adjustment by the Committee
pursuant to the third paragraph of Section 18(a)," after the word "mean."

                  4. The  foregoing  amendments  shall  apply to awards  granted
under the 1985 Plan that are outstanding on the date hereof as well as to awards
hereafter granted.

                  CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                  The undersigned,  Mary V. Sloan,  Vice President and Secretary
of American Stores Company, hereby certifies that the foregoing Amendment to the
American  Stores  Company 1985 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan was approved by
the Board of  Directors  of the  Company at a meeting of the Board of  Directors
duly called and held on October 8, 1998.

                                             /s/ Mary V. Sloan
                                             Mary V. Sloan
                                             Vice President and Secretary
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed November 24, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 1 3
- 0 1757
- CR
JOE SANCHEZ , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 13
- 56498
- Y



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices O’Neill, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion b y Justice Fillmore Joe Sanchez waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon involving family violence. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011) ; T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § § 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years’ imprisonment. In a single issue, Sanchez contends the trial court’s judgment shoul d be modified to show he entered an open plea of guilty. We modify the trial court’s judgment and affirm as modified. The record shows Sanchez entered an open guilty plea to the charges in the indictment. The judgment , however, incorrectly recites plea b argain terms as “15 years penitentiary.” We- 2

- sustain Sanchez’s sole issue. We modify the judgment to delete “15 years Penitentiary” from the “terms of plea bargain” section. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State , 865 S.W.2d 26, 27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 1993); Asberry v. State , 813 S.W.2d 526, 529

– 30 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d). As modified, w e af firm the trial court’s judgment.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

_________________ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 131757F.U05- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

JOE SANCHEZ , Appellant No. 05

- 13

- 01757

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 56498

- Y). Opinio n delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices O’Neill and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as follows: Delete “15 Years Penitentiary” from section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain.” As mo dified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment entered November 24, 2014.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4819

_____________________________
B ARRY H ABER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LO RIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Barbara K. Hobbs , Judge

. February 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ch uck Hobbs
, Tallahassee, for Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4522 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 

blend. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Mr. COURTNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic 

biodegradable polymer blend. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER 

4 BLEND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4522 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Thermoplastic biodegradable 

polymer blend containing 

1,4-benzenedicarboxylic 

acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 1,4-butanediol and 

hexanedioic acid (CAS No. 

55231–08–8 and/or 1,4- 

benzenedicarboxylic acid 

polymer with 1,4 butanediol 

and decanedioic acid (CAS 

No. 28205–74–5) and 1,4- 

dioxane-2,5-dione, 2,6-dimethyl-(3R, 6R)-polymer 

with rel-(3R, 6S)-3,6-dimethyl-1,4 dioxane-2,5-dione 

and (3S, 6S)-3,6-dimetyl1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (CAS 

No. 9051–89–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3913.90.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.50

 

 

 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT

 

February 27, 2014

 

 

 

Dear:

 

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Aqua America Inc. 2009 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”), you have been granted restricted stock units as outlined below and in the attached Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions.

 

 

|                                      |                      |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| Granted To:                               |                      |
| Grant Date:                               | February 27, 2014         |
| Number of Restricted Stock Units Granted: |                      |
| Vesting Date:                             | February 27, 2017         |
| Vesting Schedule:                         | 100% on February 27, 2017 |

 

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge and accept the award of this Restricted Stock Unit Grant and the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein, and I agree to be bound by the terms of the Restricted Stock Unit Grant, the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions and the Plan. I hereby agree that all decisions and determinations of the Committee (as defined in the Plan) with respect to the restricted stock units shall be final and binding.Signature: ________________________________________    Date: __________________________

DB1/ 74007686.1

Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; State Dementia Care Research Center.                    

*Date:*                         March 25, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Research Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2N230, (301) 496-2879,                         *sandhya.sanghi@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 22, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-04111 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of TransMontaigne Partners L.P. at December 31, 2006

|Ownership of
subsidiary |   | Name of subsidiary                    |  | Trade
Name |  | State/Country
Of Organization
|----------------------- | - | ------------------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | -----------------------------
|100                     | % | TransMontaigne Operating GP L.L.C.    |  | None       |  | Delaware                     
|100                     | % | TransMontaigne Operating Company L.P. |  | None       |  | Delaware                     
|100                     | % | Coastal Terminals L.L.C.              |  | None       |  | Delaware                     
|100                     | % | Razorback L.L.C.                      |  | None       |  | Delaware                     
|100                     | % | TPSI Terminals L.L.C.                 |  | None       |  | Delaware                     

---
| **NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details) - shares shares in Millions**    | Nov. 01, 2020 | Nov. 03, 2019 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]** |          |          |
| Number of Dilutive Shares That Could Be Issued Upon Vesting                               | 0.4           | 0.4           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_NumberOfDilutiveSharesIssuedUponVesting**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA

September 30, 2020

OREST RADIONOVICH TYRAK and )

ARSEN RADIONOVICH TYRAK, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-4864

)

ASHLEY GARCIA and DAVID GARCIA )

DIAZ, )

)

Respondents. )

)

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioners filed on June 11, 2020, their motion for a written opinion, following this 

court's denial of their petition for certiorari review, rendered on June 5, 2020. 

Petitioners contend that the facts of this matter are factually and legally similar to cases 

pending review by the Florida Supreme Court and that a written opinion will place this 

matter in the "pipeline" for resolution by the applicable law as determined by the Florida 

Supreme Court. See Barthel v. State, 882 So. 2d 1054, 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). 

Accordingly, Petitioners' motion for written opinion is granted. We vacate the June 5, 

2020 decision denying Petitioners' petition for certiorari review and substitute the 

attached opinion in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
- 2 -

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A

TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

OREST RADIONOVICH TYRAK and )

ARSEN RADIONOVICH TYRAK, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-4864

)

ASHLEY GARCIA and DAVID GARCIA )

DIAZ, )

)

Respondents. )

)

Opinion filed September 30, 2020.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Sarasota County; Stephen 

Walker, Judge. 

Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, 

P.A., Miami; and Toni-Ann S. Brown of 

Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

Petitioners.

Amy Kimberly Kenyon, of Kenyon Law 

Group, P.L.L.C., Bradenton; for 

Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Younkin v. Blackwelder, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D549 (Fla. 5th 

DCA Feb. 22, 2019), review granted, No. SC19-385, 2019 WL 2180625 (Fla. May 21, 

2019); Tortorella-Andrews v. Delvecchio, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D65 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 3, 

2020).
- 2 -

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 18-0477

MICHAEL BRACKEN AND 

LAURA BRACKEN

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Collin County,

5th District.

July 6, 2018

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

(Justice Phil Johnson not sitting)



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 16th day of August, 2018.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard  Interim Chief Financial Officer   Date:  November 20, 2006