alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 215 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and title I of 

the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 while preserving the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on Education and the Workforce, Ways and Means, House Administration, Rules, the Judiciary, and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and title I of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 while preserving the reauthorization 

of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 215 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA AND RECONCILIATION; 

2 PRESERVATION OF INDIAN HEALTH CARE IM3 PROVEMENT ACT REAUTHORIZATION. 

4 Effective as of the last day of the 60-day period be5 ginning on the date of the enactment of this Act— 

6 (1) the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

7 Act (Public Law 111–148), except for section 10221 

8 (relating to the Indian Health Care Improvement 

9 Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2009), is re10 pealed and the provisions of law amended or re11 pealed by such Act (except for provisions of law 

12 amended or repealed by such section) are restored or 

13 revived as of such day; and 

14 (2) title I of the Health Care and Education 

15 Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152) is 

16 repealed and the provisions of law amended or re17 pealed by such title are restored or revived as of 

18 such day. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
### NOTE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT I ON AGENCY WAS HIN G T O N , D

. C

. 20 4 60

O FF I CE OF CH EM IC AL SAFET Y A N D POL L UT I O N PREVENTI O N



### SU BJ ECT : Su mm a r y of a Meeting w ith the In te rn a ti o nal S leep Pr od uct s Associa ti o n 

### (I SPA ) on the Proposed Si g nifi cant New Use R ul e for T DI and Related Co mp o und s on Fe br u a ry 2 0 , 20 1 5 

### TO: EPA -HQ-OPPT- 20 11-0 976 

### FROM: K a t h erin e S l eas m a n , 202-564 -771 6 ! SPA and EPA m e t on February 20 , 2015 , to di sc u ss th e proposed SNUR fo r TDl a n d re la t e d compo und s . ISPA re qu es t e d th e Agenc y pro v ide them w i th clari fication rela t ed to th e defi niti o n of a co n s um er p ro du c t in re lat ion to full y r eac te d TD I i n m attresses. E PA s tate d th at fu ll y reacted TDI in a mattre ss wo uld n o t b e cons idere d a consumer produc t und e r th e d efi niti on in 40 CF R 72 I .3 "a c h em ica l s ub s ta n ce that i s dir ec tl y, o r as pa r t of a mixture , so ld or m ade avai lab le to consumers for their u se in o r aro und a pe rm anen t o r t empo ra ry house h old o r residence, in or a ro und a sc hool , o r in recreationa l setti n gs." E PA di sc u sse d an example of a co n s um er product u se d in the final SNUR fo r Eth y lene G l y co l E thers (79 FR74639; Decemb e r 1 6 , 2 014 ) in re la ti o n to b r ake fluid s. In the response to co mm e nt s , E PA sta t e d it wou ld co n s id e r e th y l e n e g l yco l e ther s that a re s old o r made a va ilabl e to a consumer, for th e consumer's ow n u se in mainta ini n g hi s o r h er o w n mo to r ve hi c le 

### (e.g., as part of a n aftermarket b rake fluid ) w i thin th e definiti o n of"co n s um er pro du c t. " Th e react ed TDI in the mattre ss would n ot be " m ade ava i lab le " to th e co n s um e r for the ir u se .

I n t erne t Add ress ( U R L ) • http // www e pa g ov Recyc l ed / R ec y c la bl e • Pnnte d w t th Ve g e ta ble Otl Ba sed I nks on 100% Post consum e r Proce ss Ch l onne Free Rec ycled P a per
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT (3)(i) AND (3)(ii) - ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS

     Exhibits 3(a) and (c) were filed as part of Horizon's S-14 Registration
     Statement, Registration No. 2-287946, on October 4, 1983 and are
     incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit 3(b) was filed as part of
     Horizon's 1983 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by
     reference. Exhibit 3(b)(ii) was filed as part of Horizon's 1985 Annual
     Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.




                                       10
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00083-CR

Bernardo Rodriguez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. S-15-3066CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 15, 2024
#### BRADLEY v. STATE.

No. 26736.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

*252No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of possessing beer for the purpose of sale in a diy area. The jury assessed a fine of $500.

All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review of this court as there is no statement of facts or bill of exception in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Europos Sąjungos L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0723 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | L 198 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Teisės aktai | 61 metai2018m. rugpjūčio 6d. |

ISSN 1977-0723

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

L 198

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Teisės aktai

61 metai2018m. rugpjūčio 6d.

---

| Turinys | | II   Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI |
| | * | Pranešimas apie Protokolo tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos, kuriuo nustatomas ginčų sprendimo mechanizmas, taikytinas ginčams, numatytiems pagal Europos ir Viduržemio jūros šalių susitarimo, steigiančio Europos bendrijos ir jos valstybių narių bei Libano Respublikos asociaciją, prekybos nuostatas, įsigaliojimą | 1 |

Turinys

II   Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai

Puslapis

TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI

*

Pranešimas apie Protokolo tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos, kuriuo nustatomas ginčų sprendimo mechanizmas, taikytinas ginčams, numatytiems pagal Europos ir Viduržemio jūros šalių susitarimo, steigiančio Europos bendrijos ir jos valstybių narių bei Libano Respublikos asociaciją, prekybos nuostatas, įsigaliojimą

1

| LT | Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.
  Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė. |
| --- | --- |

LT

Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.

Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė.

---

II Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai

TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI

| 2018 8 6 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | L 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2018 8 6

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

L 198/1

---

Pranešimas apie Protokolo tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos, kuriuo nustatomas ginčų sprendimo mechanizmas, taikytinas ginčams, numatytiems pagal Europos ir Viduržemio jūros šalių susitarimo, steigiančio Europos bendrijos ir jos valstybių narių bei Libano Respublikos asociaciją, prekybos nuostatas, įsigaliojimą

Protokolas tarp Europos bendrijos ir Libano Respublikos, kuriuo nustatomas ginčų sprendimo mechanizmas, taikytinas ginčams, numatytiems pagal Europos ir Viduržemio jūros šalių susitarimo, steigiančio Europos bendrijos ir jos valstybių narių bei Libano Respublikos asociaciją, prekybos nuostatas, pasirašytas 2010 m. lapkričio 11 d. Briuselyje, įsigalioja nuo 2018 m. rugsėjo 1 d. pagal jo 23 straipsnį.

---
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40034 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. LEONDRUS MCBRIDE, JR., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CV-529 USDC No. 1:96-CR-101-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leondrus McBride, Jr., federal prisoner # 0 4 4 9 6

- 0 7 8 , requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to a p peal the denial of two motions, filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), in which he sought to vacate a judgment denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. A COA is required because the denial of Rule 60(b) relief was “the final order in a proceeding under section 2255.” 28 U.S.C. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 21, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40034 Document: 00511671759 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2011No. 11-40034

§ 2253(c) ( 1 ) ( B) ; see Ochoa Canales v. Quarterman , 507 F.3d 884, 888 (5th Cir. 2007). McBride argues that reasonable jurists could debate the denial of his Rule 60(b) motions because in the initial § 2255 proceeding the district court did not address a claim that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to challenge an allegedly invalid warrant and it failed to rule on two motions for production of grand jury transcripts. The district court denied the motion s as unauthorized successive § 2255 motions. We a gr e e that the motions were unauthorized successive petitions such that the di s t ri c t court lacked jurisdiction to consider them. We dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. United States v. Key , 205 F.3d 773 (5th Cir. 2000). McBride also moves to vacate the district court’s denial of § 2255 relief on the ground that the judgment lacks finality because it did not resolve all pending motions. That motion is denied. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO VACATE DENIED.

2 Case: 11-40034 Document: 00511671759 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2011
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, AJ Vesak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of April, 2008.

BY:
/s/ AJ VESAK                        Alexander Vesak, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
### Martin , Michae l (OST) 

# DcJT'Qsr
- gubOQ.
- Uf^^G ? From : Sent : To : Subject : To Who m I t Ma

yConcern : Willia m Ridgwa y[bridgway l ©verizon.net ] Thursday , Apri l 22 , 201 0 5:1 8 P M EA S (OST ) Essentia l Ai rService contrac t a t th e Altoona-Blai rCount

yAirpor t 

### cz

> I hav e flow n ou t o

f th e Altoona-Blai rCount yAirpor t mor e tha n 1 5 time s i n th e past year . I mus t sa yth e servic e provide d b yColga n Ai rha

s bee n exemplary . Th e flight s al l depar t an d arriv e i n a timel ymanner . Th e fligh t crew was alway s courteou s an d helpful . Theyal l performe d i n a highl yprofessiona l manner . Th e servic e t o Dulle s Airpor t i s grea t du e t o th e numbe ro

f flight s t o multipl e destination s (includin g International ) whic h yo u ca n mak e connection s with . I n summar

yI hav e ha d nothin g bu t a positiv e experienc e wit h Colga n an d hop e the yar e selecte d t o continu e thei rgrea t service .
EXHIBIT 32

           (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certify that:

     (i)  This Form 10-QSB, Quarterly report, for the period ended March 31,
          2004, as filed by Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2004            BY: /s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                  -------------------------
                                  J. Philip Hester, Sr., President and C.E.O.
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: May 10, 2004            BY: /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
                                  ---------------------
                                  Deborah F. McLeod, C.F.O. and Treasurer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Alaska Natural  Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Alaska Natural  Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 7,259  | 6,523  | 9,943  | 6,410  | 11,369 | 11,094 | 15,387
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 15,267 | 13,749 | 10,656 | 12,345 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHBIT 99.1
                                                                     -----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Shimon Alon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Precise Software Solutions, Ltd. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

/S/ Shimon Alon
--------------------------
Name: Shimon Alon
Date: May 14, 2003
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1169

___________

Charles A. Trobaugh, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

Edwin F. Kelly; John A. Morrissey; * District of Iowa.

Timothy Dille; Bridget Chambers; *

Thomas Miller; Tom Vilsack, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 22, 2000

 Filed: May 30, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Charles Trobaugh filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against

various county and state officials, claiming Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment violations

based on the officials’ failure to inform him that his counsel had not filed a brief in his

state criminal appeal, and their resistance to relief Mr. Trobaugh sought upon learning
1The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

-2-

of counsel’s omission after he was discharged from his state sentence. The district

court1 dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mr. Trobaugh appeals.

Reviewing de novo, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999)

(per curiam), we conclude that dismissal was proper, because defendants had no duty

to inform Mr. Trobaugh of his counsel’s actions, and because the defendant county

attorneys and attorneys general were entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity, see

Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 273 (1993). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Trobaugh’s pending motions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 








---



##### 



Affiliate
 Beneficiary
 Committee
 Common Stock Share
 Company
 Eligible Employee
 Employee
 Employer




---



##### 



Option Plan
 Options
 Participant
 Person
 Plan
 Plan Year
 Special Bonus Amount
 Subsidiary
 
 Participation
 Continuity of Participation




---



##### 



Special Bonus Amounts
 
 Timing of Distribution of Special Bonus Amounts.
 Form of Distribution
 Beneficiary Designation
 
 Vesting in Special Bonus Amounts




---



##### 



Administration
 Interpretation
 
 Amendment and Termination provided




---



##### 



Right to Employment
 Alienation or Assignment of Benefits
 Severability
 Right to Withhold
 Governing Law
 Effective Date
 Date: November 12, 2007
    ITC HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Linda H. BlairLinda H. BlairIts:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer
OTHA L. ABNEY

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4645

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Otha L. Abney , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

BENTON, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ.

, CONCUR.
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements    (Form S-8    Nos.    333-125990,333-128841,333-130946,333-136906,333-136907,333-146282,333-146515)    pertaining to the Employees’ Savings Plan of ev3 Inc. of    our reports dated March 12, 2008, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements and schedule of ev3 Inc., and    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting    of ev3 Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Minneapolis, Minnesota    March 12, 2008
#### Frances S. et al., Respondents, v Rachel K. et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding by maternal grandparents to obtain visitation rights with their grandchild pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 72, the parents appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated June 2, 1989, which denied their motion to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The maternal grandparents commenced this proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 72 to compel visitation *529with their two grandchildren over the objection of the children’s natural parents. The petition and supporting affidavits failed to establish that any circumstances exist which would warrant judicial scrutiny of the parents’ decision in this matter *(see, Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E.,*161 AD2d 83). No evidence was offered that the parents have abdicated or forfeited their parental responsibilities, and it is apparent from the affidavits that the present situation is the result of animosity between the parties. The court therefore erred in denying the parents’ motion to dismiss the petition *(see, Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., supra).*Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### J. C. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27125.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Robbery is the offense, with punishment assessed at twenty years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.