alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cove Hollow Realty Corporation, Respondent, v 1426 Third Avenue Corporation et al., Defendants, and Julian *283Davis, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered on or about June 11, 1990, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3213, to the extent of awarding judgment in plaintiff’s favor against defendant Davis in the sum of $300,000, plus interest, and denying Davis’ cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant Davis, together with Steven Mann and codefendant Barry Wilke, executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $300,000 payable on demand, with interest due on the first day of each month at a rate of 12% per annum. It is disputed whether Mann deleted his name from the instrument at the time of execution of the agreement or subsequently, which he, like the individual defendants, signed in a representative capacity on behalf of defendant corporation. Mann, Davis and Wilke guaranteed payment of the note and consented in advance to any and all extensions of time or terms of payment, without notice. When payment of interest was not made when due and demanded, plaintiff moved pursuant to CPLR 3213.

In defense, Davis alleged that subsequent correspondence received by him from defendant Mann, also a principal of plaintiff, altered the terms of the note and effected his discharge from liability. This argument was properly rejected by the IAS court since, by nature of the guarantee, Davis consented to and acquiesced in any alteration of the terms of the instrument. Thus, the defense alleged is insufficient to present a triable issue of fact warranting denial of plaintiff’s motion as against Davis. Davis also claims that Mann’s obliteration of his name as signatory on behalf of defendant corporation presents a triable issue of fact and effects discharge of his obligation as guarantor. Davis’ obligation may only be discharged if there was an alteration of the contract to which his guarantee applied, whether material or not. *(Congregation Ohavei Shalom v Comyns Bros.,*123 AD2d 656, 657, *appeal withdrawn*70 NY2d 708.) Deletion of Mann’s signature effected no such result, since two signatures were required to bind defendant corporation to plaintiff, under the promissory note, and Davis’ and Wilke’s signatures remained. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Colorado Natural Gas Processed in Colorado (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Colorado Natural Gas Processed in Colorado (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |           | 1,507,467 | 1,460,433 | 1,368,677 | 1,491,693 | 1,660,386 | 1,658,987 | 1,646,502 | 1,856,177 | 1,945,221
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,119,095 | 1,900,080 | 1,821,571 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### R. W. MERRITT, Appellant, v. J. B. ESTES’ ADMINISTRATRIX, (Earie Estes), Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 12, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1955.

Redwine & Redwine, M. C. Redwine, Winchester, for appellant.

D. L. Pendleton, Winchester, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Clark Circuit Court dismissing appellant’s petition in an equity action for the recovery of $998.84. The facts, questions raised, authorities cited and applicable law have been carefully considered by the Court, and we find no prejudicial error.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 30, 2012   /s/  "Ruth Swan" Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Salomon Sredni, Chief
Executive Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|August 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date           |  |  |  | Salomon Sredni         
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Card, Chief Executive Officer of Jet Gold Corporation. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 28, 2007





/s/  Robert Card

Robert Card,

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert Card, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Jet Gold Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 17, 2008

|                               |  |                 
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------
|By:                            |  | /s/  Robert Card
|                               |  |                 
|Robert Card,
President and CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the February
26, 1999 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-27-1999             AUG-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-26-1999             FEB-26-1999
<CASH>                                            1327                    1327
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19100                   19100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      17224                   17224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 38908                   38908
<PP&E>                                          168255                  168255
<DEPRECIATION>                                   71664                   71664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  136608                  136608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24249                   24249
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         40                      40
<COMMON>                                          2788                    2788
<OTHER-SE>                                       72134                   72134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    136608                  136608
<SALES>                                          28042                   56516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28042                   56516
<CGS>                                            24830                   50697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8141                   12862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 664                     987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5693                    8030
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6111                    9102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55                     .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55                     .84
        

</TABLE>
U.S.Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary otTransportation ,_ ' .• subject: Exceptionto Normal Payout Procedures for Subsidized Carriers at Shutdown-Airports (Docket**DOT-OS)T-20~-0303)**

# /~~~~-;.. 

# 0.. . cl!j2J!/rvv/1_9--v From: Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis, X-53

To: Gregory Frazier
Reference: Order 2013-10-8 Airport Closing 

# Memorandum

Date: July 29, 2014 Reply to Michael Martin, X-53 Attn. Ext 66494 of:

Chippowa County International Airport (CIU), serving Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, was closed from June 2 through June 22, 2014 due to the airport repaving its runway. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) has been operating subsidized EAS at CIU. Ithas been ourpolicy, on a case-by-case basis, to paythe airline its usual subsidy rate when airports have been closed onthe grounds that the circumstances are beyond the airline's control. Consistent with thatprecedent, we ask you to compensate Delta for flights that could notbe operated on the dates stated above due to the airport closure. cc: DeltaAir Lines, Inc.
LIBERTY GLOBAL, INC.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 DEFERRAL ELECTION FORM
   I. DEFERRAL ELECTION :
 A. 2009 Base Salary
 o
 B. 2008 Cash Performance Award
 o
 C. Performance Incentive Plan
 o
 Apply DeferralInstallment Due
    
    Portion Deferred
    
    to Cash First*March 31, 2009September 30, 2009March 31, 2010September 30, 2010March 31, 2011September 30, 2011
 
 *
    
    Check if the deferral election should be applied first to any cash portion of the
installment.




---



##### 



II. TIMING AND FORM OF DISTRIBUTION
 A. Timing of Elective Distribution Event
  1. o
 2. o
 o
 o
 o
 o
 B. Form of Payment
  o
 o
 o
    
 *Note:
    
    For certain officers who are defined as specified employees under Section 409A, the
payment of any deferred compensation due to Separation from Service for any reason (other than
death) will be delayed until 6 months after the date of such separation. -2-




---



##### 



III. PARTICIPANT SIGNATURE AND DATE :
     ________________________________________
    
    Deliver by December 31, 2008 to:Participants Signature________________________________________

Date Signed
    
    Liberty Global, Inc.
Attn: Senior Vice President, Global
           Human Resources
12300 Liberty Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80112
 -3-
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4441 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Triflic Anhydride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the rate of duty on Triflic 

Anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Triflic Anhydride (CAS 

No. 358–23–06) (provided 

for in subheading 

2904.90.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4441 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Oklahoma (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Oklahoma (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 94,041  | 96,858 | 115,020 | 116,601 | 121,678 | 137,127 | 173,845 | 196,645
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 179,801 | 179,377 | 177,900 |        |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### CHRISTOPHER v. STATE.

No. 23546.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary, for a period of seven years.

The record is before this court without any bills of exception. The State’s Attorney objects to a consideration of the statement of facts because same was filed more than ninety days from the date of the order overruling the motion for new trial and the entry of notice of appeal. This objection must be sustained. In the instant case, the motion for a new trial was overruled on the Sth day of June, 1946, at which time notice of appeal was given, but the statement of facts was not filed until the 7th day of September, 1946. This was 93 days after the motion for a new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given. See Art. 760, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760, also Bailey v. State, 104 Tex.Cr.R. 150, 282 S.W. 804; Kolbachinski v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 61, 284 S.W. 951; Davis v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 348, 287 S.W. 1100; Picarino v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 120, 8 S.W.2d 142; Garcia v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 190, 36 S.W.2d 173; Greenwood v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 72, 38 S.W.2d 798; Hall v. State, Tex.Cr.App,. 38 S.W.2d 800; Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 46 S.W.2d 974; Lampkins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 79 S.W.2d 1089. Under the law and the authorities here cited, the statement of facts cannot be considered, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 76    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 76     | 113    | 192    | 217    | 221    | 287    | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023