alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
\eqj^^S^ f^-^ ^ ?<<^^s;-^-^ t/-£^t^-"t o^ - ^^^'^-oji^s:^ 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

' ' liiiiiiT \}\ 

1 X0 From: Lane Rodgers [lrodgers@www.greenville.ms.us] 

Sent: Friday. July 15. 2011 12:34 PIVI 

To: Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Cc: Mike_Cilenti@wicker.senate.gov; greg_orlando@wicker.senate.gov ; C| •;; :(]._ QO 

Good Morning Kevin, 

I just spoke with Delta this morning and you probably have their press release. 

I am writing to ask for an extension in the bidding process for the Mid Delta Regional Airport for at least 90 

days. 

These actions taken by Delta are unprecedented and therefore I believe additional lime is needed for all 

concerned to be able to discuss and plan accordingly. 

There are several airlines interested in serving this region and we are excited about their and our prospects for 

updated and legitimate air service. It only makes sense to take some lime to think this though 

because decisions that are made now will be felt for the next several years. 

The purpose for this delay is to allow airlines interested in serving our area time to gather additional information 

to properly bid and to negotiation with Delta or another major carrier for a code share agreement. As you are 

aware our service would really benefit if the airline chosen to replace Delta operated with a code share 

agreement. 

Should you need additional information or an official request, please don't hesitate to ask. 

With Warm Regards 

Lane Rodgers 

Airport Director 

Mid Delta Regional Airport 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

Thi/i/ ccnyvmctvUccUXoyv (i*^ciudA.n^ an y attadune-yiCy) C^ i-nferuied- foi- the/ u^^ of the^ Cnt&nded/ 

v'QAUpie-*^(}/) only on ^ niuy oyy\X:cU'n^iAvfcyi''mxAXton/ti^^ priA/ile.^e^Oi'' le^ixlly 

protected^. Any u^cuAthof'i^ed/utie/en' d^},!,e-tni-vuxtio-t^of tPu,i< coin4yuA,yUc<:xtloyv iy }^'ictly prohibited/. 

If you/ hcwe/ received/ thi^ coyiv^vuwiiccUruyYX/ i-n e^^vot', ple^M^ inune^iAX^eXy notify the/ },e^\Aa-¥' hy 

returyv e/- mcUh vyie^},oj^ cmd/ delete/ aXh copies of the/ ot'ic^-i'uU/ conxvyui.nic<xtlon/. 

Thank you for your cooperation.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 1303 V

UNPUBLISHED

BRIAN KORPACZ

,

Petitioner

,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 9, 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order
concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On April 30 , 2021

, Brian Korpacz filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2

Petitioner alleged that he suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus

vaccination s in “ June, July, and October 2014. ” ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g )

. O n December 2 7 , 2021

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to

withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk ’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4508 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4508

       To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on 
                            Difenoconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on 
                            Difenoconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Difenoconazole) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``2.3%''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1834 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

47) IV-H-01 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/10/2008 2:14:35 PM Sheet 47 of 61 
P.2 

/4-7O-07 

NOTE TO: Troy Hillier 

Office of Management and Budget 

FROM: Judy Gray, Senior Project Manager 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch, OMS 

SUBJECT: Fuels and Fuel Additives (F/FA) Pro 

Final Rule Draft Documents 

Apr* 7. 19^[J)rI? EJUJL ^ 

J MAY L b 1994 

j^P/s aiR DOCKET 

As promised yesterday by Glenn Passavant, here are the most current drafts of 

the final rule preamble and RIA/RFA for the F/FA health effects testing program. The 

regulatory text and ICR will follow shortly. 

As I'm sure Glenn explained, we are sending these drafts to give you a 

reasonable opportunity to review and understand the rule, considering that our court 

ordered deadline of May 27th (just extended from April 29th) will not allow the 

customary OMB review period after workgicup closure. While some additional 

changes will no doubt be made, we think diese documents are very close to their final 

form. 

I'll be glad to discuss the program with you or answer questions you may have 

about it. Please feel free to call me at 313-668-4231 (FAX 313-741-7816). 

cc: Glenn Passavant
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of NCL Corporation Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 22, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN M. SHEEHAN
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Kevin M. Sheehan                                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ WENDY A. BECK   
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Wendy A. Beck                                       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3405

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Jeffrey B. Austin, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 2004 Filed: May 12, 2004

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Austin appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm following a bench trial. Austin contends the evidence was insufficient to convict him because he no longer lived at the residence where the firearms were seized. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude there was sufficient evidence that Austin possessed the firearms, either actually or constructively, on or about the date of the seizure. See United States v. Gary , 341 F.3d 829, 834 (8 thCir. 2003) (constructive possession established by showing firearm was seized at defendant’s residence).* The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- In the course of a drug investigation, police obtained a warrant to search Austin’s home at 1814 South Ferguson Street in Springfield, Missouri. Before the search, police had conducted surveillance and had seen two cars belonging to Austin at the location. After Austin left in one of the cars, officers stopped him and arrested him. At the time of his arrest, Austin possessed the keys to the residence at 1814 South Ferguson. Later that day, during the search of 1814 South Ferguson, officers found two loaded pistols and a shotgun in a bedroom. In the same bedroom, officers also found a photo identification card belonging to Austin, current prescription medicines in his name, and men’s clothing. Further, the home’s utility records were in Austin’s name, Austin made the mortgage payments and had an arrangement with the owner to buy the residence, and Austin listed 1814 South Ferguson as his home address when he was booked less than two months earlier. Witnesses also testified they saw Austin living at the residence during the month of the search and saw him possess the firearms that were later seized by the police. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude substantial evidence supports the district court’s * conviction of Austin. See United States v. Navarrete-Barron , 192 F.3d 786, 792 (8 th Cir. 1999) (bench trial standard of review). We thus affirm.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Salomon Sredni, Chief
Executive Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|                 |  |                        
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 6, 2008 |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date             |  | Salomon Sredni         
|                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4450 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4450

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Acrylic staple      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          fibers                                                            12/31/2015
                          (polyacrylonitril
                          e staple)
                          containing 85
                          percent or more
                          by weight of
                          acrylonitrile
                          units and 2
                          percent or more
                          but not over 3
                          percent of water,
                          colored, crimped,
                          with an average
                          decitex of 2.2
                          (plus or minus 10
                          percent) and
                          fiber length of
                          45 mm (plus or
                          minus 10 percent)
                          and fiber
                          tenacity of 40 CN/
                          TEX (plus or
                          minus 10 percent)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5503.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES STEEL COMPANY, Appellant, v. Louis ISBELL et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 25, 1955.

James Sampson, Edward G. Hill, Harlan, Middleton, Seelbach, Wolford, Willis & Cochran, Louisville, for appellant.

J. Leonard Davis, Harlan, for appellees.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a judgment approving an award of compensation to ap-pellee, Louis Isbell. The United States Steel Company, appellee’s employer, urges a reversal of the judgment, contending that Isbell’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.

On the occasion he sustained his injury, Isbell rode to work in an automobile owned and driven by another employee of the company. The operator of the car entered the mining property and parked the car on a parking lot provided by the company. The ground was covered with snow. Isbell got out of the car and walked toward the bathhouse where the employees changed their clothes in preparation to enter the mine. He slipped and fell as he was walking down an embankment, causing a fracture of his right knee. It appears that the route taken by Isbell was a path which had been used by him and by other employees in going to and from their work, although there was available for their use a road built by the company from the parking lot to the bathhouse.

Apparently the Workmen’s Compensation Board was of the opinion that Isbell had suffered an injury which was compensable under the rule set forth in the case of Wilson Berger Coal Co. v. Brown, 223 Ky. 183, 3 S.W.2d 199. However, we have recently re-examined our decisions with reference to this subject.

*918In Harlan-Wallins Coal Corp. v. Stewart, decided this day, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 912, we held that an injury occurring while the employee is on the employer’s premises does not ipso facto fasten liability on the employer. The case was remanded to the Board with directions to enter an order dismissing the application for compensation because it was not shown that the injuries suffered by the employee had a causative connection with something peculiar to the employment. The facts in the case at bar are substantially the same as those appearing in the Stewart case. In view of that decision we must reverse the judgment for the reasons therein assigned.

The judgment is reversed, with directions that the case be remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for an entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

MILLIKEN and MONTGOMERY, JJ., dissent.

HOGG, J., not sitting.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2293 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for full benefits 

for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2011 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

for full benefits for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FULL BENEFITS FOR DISABLED WIDOWS AND 

4 WIDOWERS WITHOUT REGARD TO AGE. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE6 FITS.—Section 202(e) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 402(e)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘has at9 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2293 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘after at2 taining age 50 if she was entitled before such mar3 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en4 titled’’; and 

5 (3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘after at6 taining age 50’’. 

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY FOR WIDOWER’S INSURANCE BENE8 FITS.—Section 202(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(f)) is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘has at11 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’; 

12 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘after at13 taining age 50 if he was entitled before such mar14 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en15 titled’’; and 

16 (3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘after at17 taining age 50’’. 

18 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM REDUCTIONS IN BENEFITS. 

19 Section 202(q) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 402(q)) is amended— 

21 (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘age 50’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘age 60’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

24 paragraph: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2293 IH

1 ‘‘(12) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

2 section, there shall be no reduction under this subsection 

3 in the widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit of an indi4 vidual for any month in which such individual is under 

5 a disability (as defined in section 223(d)); and none of 

6 the provisions of this subsection shall apply with respect 

7 to such benefit even though such benefit may have been 

8 so reduced prior to the onset of such disability.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND REDETERMINATION OF BEN10 EFITS. 

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

12 respect to monthly insurance benefits payable under title 

13 II of the Social Security Act for months after the month 

14 in which this Act is enacted. The Commissioner of Social 

15 Security (without the necessity of any application there16 for) shall redetermine the amount of any widow’s or wid17 ower’s insurance benefit which is payable for the month 

18 in which this Act is enacted in order to reflect such 

19 amendments as provided in the preceding sentence. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Calif--San Joaquin Basin Onshore Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 740    | 321   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 234    | 233    | 111    | 110    | 158    | 238    | 228    | 168    | 117    | 146   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 210    | 163    | 226    | 214    | 216    | 256    | 219    | 213    | 184    | 279   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 173    | 150    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023