alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2076 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the statutory authority 

for the longstanding practice of the Department of Justice of providing 

investigatory assistance on request of State and local authorities with 

respect to certain serious violent crimes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2011 

Mr. GOWDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the statutory authority for the longstanding practice of the Department of Justice of providing investigatory assistance 

on request of State and local authorities with respect 

to certain serious violent crimes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investigative Assist5 ance for Violent Crimes Act of 2011’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2076 IH

1 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATION OF MASS KILLING OR ATTEMPTED 

2 MASS KILLING AND OTHER VIOLENT CRIMES. 

3 Title 28, United States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) in section 530C(b)(1)(L)(i), by striking 

5 ‘‘2,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘ ‘$3,000,000’;’’ 

6 (2) in section 530C(b)(4), by adding at the end 

7 the following: ‘‘The authority to conduct or assist in 

8 investigations includes the authority to deploy tac9 tical response, command and control, and other cri10 sis-management assets of the Bureau, as appro11 priate; and any such conduct or assistance shall be 

12 understood presumptively to be within the scope of 

13 Federal office or employment.’’; 

14 (3) in section 540A— 

15 (A) by amending the section title to read 

16 ‘‘Investigation of certain violent 

17 crimes;’’ 

18 (B) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, in the 

19 investigation of violent acts and shootings oc20 curring in venues such as schools, colleges, uni21 versities, non-Federal office buildings, malls, 

22 and other public places, and in the investigation 

23 of mass killings and attempted mass killings’’ 

24 after ‘‘traveler’’; and 

25 (C) in subsection (c), by adding the fol26 lowing new paragraph at the end: 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2076 IH

1 ‘‘(4) ‘mass killings’ means three or more 

2 killings in a single incident.’’; and 

3 (4) in the table of sections at the beginning of 

4 chapter 33, by striking the item relating to section 

5 540A and inserting the following: 

‘‘540A. Investigation of certain violent crimes.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 21    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -72    | 145    | 239    | -51    | 173    | 341    | 336    | 114    | 160    | -375  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 559    | -746   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December                31,                2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the                "Annual                Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Paul O. Koether                              |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Paul                O. Koether                                  |   |   |
| Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer             |   |   |
|                                                            |   |   |
|                                                            |   |   |
| /s/                Bryan P. Healey                              |   |   |
| Bryan                P. Healey                                  |   |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |   |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6566

ANTHONY S. FAIR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00-

604)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S. Fair, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony S. Fair seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fair v. Conroy, No. CA-00-604

(D. Md. Mar. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                 
|No chart available.                                                 
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|South Dakota Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 13.2

             Rule 13a-14b Certification of Chief Financial Officer


In connection with the Annual Report of New World Batteries, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, , Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 27, 2008

/s/ Marcus Weston
-----------------
Marcus Weston
Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 50508 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Aureliano Moreno -**  **Garcia,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:18 - CR - 2373 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Jolly, Stewart**  **,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Aurelian o Moreno - Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, conspir acy to import more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, and importation of more than 500 grams of

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 23, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50508 Document: 83-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024No. 23 - 50508

2 methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred by denying him a safety - valve reduction based on a finding that he did not truthfully provide all information to the Government. Relying on United States v. Lima - Rivero , 971 F.3d 518, 520 (5th Cir. 2020) , Moreno - Garcia contends that the district court clearly erred by resting its denial on the case agent’s speculative testimony, which was based solely on the agent’s training and experience. Under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(18), a two
- level reduction applies if the defendant meets the safety - valve criteria set forth in § 5C1.2(a)(1)
- (5), including the requirement, relevant here, that prior to sentencing the defendant truthfully provide the Government with all known information about the offense and relevant conduct related to the offense. See § 5C1.2(a)(5). It is the defendant’s burden to ensure “that he has provided all the information and evidence regarding the offense to the Government.” United States v. Flanagan , 80 F.3d 143, 146 - 47 (5th Cir. 1996). This court reviews for clear error a district court’s decision regarding the applicability of the reduction. United States v. McCrimmon , 443 F.3d 454, 457 (5th Cir. 2006). The conclusion that Moreno - Garcia failed to provide all information was not based on speculation . Rather, there was evidence, including inconsistent and implausible statements by Moreno - Garcia concerning the events , that support the district court’s finding that he failed to satisfy § 5C1.2(a)(5). A ccordingly, the judgment is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-50508 Document: 83-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2024
|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History:                                         
|                                                      
|No chart available.                                   
|No chart available.                                   
|                                                      
|                                                      
|New York Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# ^\^ C o ^ 

# AW'^f

n

DEPARTMEir rO F TRANSPORTATIO N

AN D PUBLI C FACILITIE S OFFIC E O F TH E COMMISSIONE R 5EANPARNELL , GOVERNO R 313 2 CHANNE L DRIV E POBo x11250 0 JUNEAU , ALASKA99811-250 0 FAX : PHONE : (907 ) 586-836 5

(907 ) 465-390 0 Apri l 16,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d; ^ j Secretar y H q U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n;: - Q 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at

Adak , Alask aDocke t

OST-2000-855 6 Dea r Secretar y LaHood : Thi s lette r

i s t o expres s ou r

stron g suppor t

for th e continuatio no f

th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e agreemen t

at Ada k an dth e critica l connectio ni t bring s t o on e o f

th e mos t remot e communitie s i n ou r nation . Th e Stat e o f

Alask aunderstand s th e importanc e place do ncommunit y comment s an dsupport s th e USDO T i nth e statement s mad e concernin g Ada k i npreviou s awards , specificall y Orde r 2003-1-8 :

.. . "Departmen t

ha s traditionall y give neve ngreate r weigh t t o desire s o f

Alask acommunities , give nth e state' s greate r dependenc e o nai r

service . Clearly , n o communit y currentl y relyin g o nsubsidize dai r

sen'ic e i s a s isolate dan ddependen t o nai r sennc e a s Adak . " an dreiterate di nOrde r

2008-3-36 : "A s n e hav e previousl y stated , whil e require db y statut e t o giv e grea t weigh t t o communit y preferences , th e Departmen t ha s traditionall y give neve nmor e significan t weigh t t o th e desire s o f

Alask acommunitie s vs . non-Alask acommunitie s sinc e the y ar e dependen t o nai r service . " W e agre e wholeheartedl y tha t th e communit y i s th e bes t judg e o f th e leve l an dtyp e o f

servic e require dt o mee t

th e essentia l need s o f

th e peopl e an drespectfull y reques t th e USDO T suppor t th e documente dcommunit y need s i nth e Cit y o f Adak . ^ . Sincer e

cc : Denni s DeVany , Chie f EA S an dDomesti c Analysis , U.S . DO T Bil l MacKay , Sr . Vic e Presiden t Alaska , Alask aAirline s Dann y Seybert , President , PenAi r
A FS

- 1 3

- 228

- P March 11, 2014

Mr. Ben Kadrlik

Regulatory Specialist

Chart SeQual Technologies , Inc.

2200 Airport Industrial Drive, Suite 500

Ball Ground, GA 30107

Dear Mr. Kadrlik :

This letter is in response to your letter sent to the public docket dated February 7 , 2013

( D ock et No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 157 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of

Chart Se Q ual Technologies , Inc. ( SeQual ) to amend part 121, Special Federal Aviation

Regulation (SFAR) 106 of Title 14, Code of Regulation (14 CFR) to include SeQual ’ s

eQuin ox Oxygen System (model 4000) as one of the approved portable oxygen concentrators

(POCs) devices for use on passenger aircraft.

On February 3, 2014 , the FAA amended 14 CFR p art 12 1 , SFAR 106 related to POCs

( 79 FR 607 8 ) . A copy of this rule change is en closed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action

on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Thuy H. Cooper

Acting Manager, Airman and

Airspace Rules Division
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6645** 

RASHAD MONTRELL CHATMAN , P etitioner

- Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cv - 00465

- RBS

- TEM )

Submitted : October 14 , 2010 Decided: October 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un publis hed per curiam opinion
.
Rashad Montrell Chatman , Appellant Pro Se. Erin M. Kulpa, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , R ichmond, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rashad Montre ll Chatman seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U. S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional ri ght. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chatman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because t he facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED