alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Devine Entertainment Corporation,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 11, 2008
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Richard Mozer
                                           Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### ENSMINGER et al. v. STATE.

No. 26551.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1953.

None on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellants were convicted for the offense of robbery, and the punishment of each was assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Carl J. Grivner, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XO Communications,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004                                                              /s/   Carl J. Grivner   Carl J. Grivner   Chief Executive Officer
lamiiNimioiNi 

An Employee Ownod Company 

James E. McGlothlin / ; A ;/ -j • 

Chief R.vtculive O/ficc i . i ' i t • J ^ 

August 18. 30i0 

Aloha Ley 

Acting Associate Director, X-50 

U.S. Depai'tmenl of Transponaiion 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE WS6-310 

Washinglon, DC 20590 

Ms. Ley: 

Quintron Systems has learned there is consideration being given to allow a direct /light route 

between Santa Maria and Denver. We would like to provide you a very strong support 

recommendation for approval of this new route. 

Quintron does business with many Government and Defense locations around the country. Several 

of these are in Colorado, so a direct route to Denver would be a valuable assist to our interactions 

in that region. In addition, Denver is a major hub airport that would provide easy connections 

eastward to most of our other major customer locations. 

Similarly, air travel into our Central Coast region would benefit greatly from this new route. 

Beyond commercial passengers, there is constant and considerable Military traffic into our region 

lo support Vandenberg AFB which much of it coming Irom the Colorado area as well. This 

optional route would not only provide more efficient travel for all passengers but also promote a 

healthier competitive environment as well, contributing to savings for citizens and Government 

Agencies alike. 

In short, we believe approval of this additional air route to/from Santa Maria has significant 

positive impacts for our city and region. We request youi- favorable consideration. 

Very truly yours, 

James E. McGlothlin
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  1.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126902) pertaining to the Pike Holdings, Inc.
2002 Stock Options A, Pike Holdings, Inc. 2002 Stock Options Plan B, and Pike Electric
Corporation 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan,
 2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-150815) pertaining to the Pike Electric
Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan,
 3.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130087) pertaining to the Pike Electric
Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and
 4.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-137158) of Pike Electric Corporation.
MW EPA CAA Testing Method 315 Potline Downcomer

36 HR Test Start Date Al Production

MCEM 

Gaseous

MCEM 

Particulate

MCEM 

Total

MCEM 

Total Particulate Particulate

tons/hr lbs/TAP lbs/TAP lbs/TAP lbs/hr lbs/TAP lbs/hr

4/22/2013 16.87 0.18 0.08 0.26 4.39 1.26 21.26

4/24/2013 16.87 0.13 0.06 0.19 3.21 2.27 38.29

4/25/2013 16.87 0.09 0.09 0.18 3.04 2.83 47.74

5/7/2013 16.87 0.16 0.09 0.23 3.88 2.62 44.20

Plant Average 16.87 0.22 3.71 2.25 37.96
#### LAPADURA v. UNITED STATES.

No. 6403.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

July 21, 1937.

Minturn & Weinberger, of Newark, N. J. (Harry H. Weinberger, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellant.

John J. Quinn, U. S. Atty., of Red Bank, N. J., and William F. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J.

Before THOMPSON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey. The defendant was charged in an indictment containing four counts with violation of the internal revenue laws, in that he carried on the business of a distiller with intent to defraud the government of the tax; was in the possession of an unregistered still; worked in a distillery upon which there was no sign “Registered Distillery” ; and made and fermented mash in a building not authorized as a distillery. The defendant was convicted on the first and fourth counts, the court having directed a verdict of acquittal on the second and third counts.

The case presented by the United States rested entirely upon the testimony of one Conor, a member of the Alcohol Beverage Control Unit of the State of New Jersey, who stated that while he was concealed in the kitchen of one Cincio, he overheard the following conversation:

> *“A.*He stated he hadn’t got any rent for the premises, and he was informed by Lapadura that the place hadn’t been going for a few days, and that they were going to start that night, and that he would get the rent in a few days.

> “Q. Who told him that? A. Lapadura.

> “Q. Told Cincio that? A. That is correct.

> “Q. After that conversation took place, did Lapadura remain on the premises ? A. No, he left the premises in an automobile.”

There was further testimony that a still was found in a barn on the same premises as the farmhouse in which the witness was concealed.

The record is barren of testimony as to any facts connecting the defendant with distillation of spirits or fermentation of mash other than the conversation set out above. We are of the opinion that the trial judge should have directed a verdict for the defendant on all counts.

Judgment reversed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2


I, Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Molecular
Evolution, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

            Date: November 4, 2003     By: /s/ Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

          - [NPS-WASO-D-COS-POL-36997; PPWODIREP0; PPMPSAS1Y.000000; PX.XDIRE0039]

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Secretary of the Interior is giving notice of the renewal of the Advisory Committee on Reconciliation in Place Names. The Committee identifies geographic feature names and                               ( print page 15610)                            Federal land unit names that are considered derogatory and solicits input on the process for generating replacement names.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Andrea DeKoter, Committee Manager for the Advisory Committee on Reconciliation in Place Names, Office of Policy, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW, Washington, DC 20240; by email at                         *reconciliation_committee@nps.gov;*                         or by telephone at (202) 354-2220.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Committee was established by authority of the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) under 54 U.S.C. 100906 and is regulated by the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). The certification of renewal is published below.

*Certification Statement:*                     I hereby certify that the renewal of the Advisory Committee on Reconciliation in Place Names is necessary, in the public interest, and is in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior and in furtherance of the National Park Service Organic Act (54 U.S.C. 100101*et seq.*), the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742a), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701), the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd), and other Acts applicable to specific bureaus.                

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. Ch. 10)

Deb Haaland,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2024-04484 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
EXHIBIT 23.01


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Intelliquis International, Inc. and Subsidiary


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of  Intelliquis  International, Inc. (a Nevada  corporation)
and  subsidiary,  as of December 31, 1999  and  the  related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'  equity
and  cash flows for the year then ended.  These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion  on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We   conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally
accepted  auditing standards.  Those standards require  that
we   plan  and  perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material  misstatement.  An audit includes examining,  on  a
test  basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in   the  financial  statements.   An  audit  also  includes
assessing  the  accounting principles used  and  significant
estimates  made  by  management, as well as  evaluating  the
overall  financial statement presentation.  We believe  that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In   our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial  statements
referred  to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the  financial  position of Intelliquis International,  Inc.
and  subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and the  results  of
its  operations and cash flows for the year  then  ended  in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/Crouch, Bierwolf & Chisolm
-----------------------------
Crouch, Bierwolf & Chisolm


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 31, 2000
** **

**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONBY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Steven R. Berrard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Services Acquisition Corp. International;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and we have:

a)  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control  over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 27, 2006 |   | /s/ STEVEN R.  BERRARD                |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Name: Steven R. Berrard               |
|                      |   | Title: *Principal Financial  Officer* |

 

----
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Sign:                   | /S/  Geoffrey  M. Boyd |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Geoffrey M. Boyd        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 13, 2006       |

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or asa separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60395-60396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24367]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

7 CFR Part 505

Modification of Interlibrary Loan Fee Schedule; Correction

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed rule published in the Federal Register on 
September 16, 2011 (76 FR 57681) announced Agricultural Research 
Service intent to seek comments on renewing the National Agricultural 
Library's regulation to increase the interlibrary loan fees. This 
document corrects the RIN number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kay Derr, 301-504-5879.

[[Page 60396]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 16, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-
23723, on pages 57681-57682 in the heading section, correct the RIN 
number to read as follows: RIN 0518-AA04

Yvette Anderson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer for Agricultural Research Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-24367 Filed 9-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```