alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

NO. 03-22-00451-CV

Chupik Properties and Design, Inc., and Randall Chupik, Appellants

v.

MCCS, Ltd., Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-19-006861, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This Court issued its opinion and judgment in this case April 24, 2024. On

June 20, 2024, appellants and appellee filed a joint motion notifying the Court that they had 

reached a mutual settlement of the underlying claims and requesting that we dismiss the case

with prejudice.

1

 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we grant the parties’ joint 

motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment, withdraw our judgment dated April 24, 2024, and 

dismiss the case with prejudice. See id. R. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (c), 43.2(e). We tax costs against the 

party incurring same.

1 This Court granted appellee’s multiple motions for extension of time to file a motion 

for rehearing and has construed the parties’ joint motion as a motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 19.1 (providing that pending motion for rehearing extends appellate court’s period of 

plenary power).
2

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Theofanis

Vacated and Dismissed on Motion for Rehearing

Filed: July 5, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00-231-002 and EL00-22-002]


The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Filing

September 19, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 13, 2000, The Cincinnati Gas & 
Electric Company tendered for filing its refund compliance report in 
the above-captioned dockets.
    The compliance report has been served on the public utility 
commissions of the States of Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, affected 
wholesale customers, and all persons on the service list.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before October 4, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24513 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### INLAND GAS CORP. v. FLINT et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 11, 1954.

'Howárd & Francis, Prestorisburg, for appellant.- ■" ’ ’ ■ - -

Ben Mann, Paintsville, Howard Mann and A. H. Adams, Salyersville, for appel-lees.

CAMMACK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein the Johnson Circuit Court reversed the findings of, the' Workmen’s Compensation Board and directed it to enter an award in favor of appellee.

The case of Inland Gas Corporation v. Flint, Ky., 255 S.W.2d 1006, is controlling here. In that case Nell Flint, individually, and Nell Flint as next friend of Beecher Flint, filed their claims against the Inland Gas Corporation for the death of Curtis Flint, who was the husband and father respectively of the claimants. The Board refused to allow the claim. On a trial in the Johnson Circuit Court the Board was directed to enter an award in favor of the claimants. The Inland Gas Corporation appealed. We reversed the judgment on the ground the claim was not filed with the Workmen’s' Compensation Board within the one year limitation period. In the opinion we pointed out that the appeal to this Court was against the widow alone, because the addition of. “et al.” in the statement of appeal filed by the Corporation did not bring the infant before this Court.

The appellant is now seeking a reversal Of the judgment in favor of Nell Flint, as next friend Of Beecher Flint, because the statute of limitations was also a bar to his claim. The appellee' argues that a next friend has to be appointed for an infant before the statute of limitations starts to run against the infant. We held in McIntosh v. John P. Gorman Coal Co., 253 Ky. 160, 69 S.W.2d 7, that where an infant child is living with its mother, she becomes its next friend by operation of law for the purpose of prosecuting an action for recovery for the death of its father, and the statute of limitations is not suspended because of infancy under such conditions. That case is controlling here. See also KRS 342.210.

*240Judgment reversed, with directions to set it aside, and for the entry of a judgment in conformity with this opinion.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Idaho Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Idaho Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 5      | 27    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 19     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 46 (Thursday, March 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16561-16562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-11774-01-R6]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to 
State Operating Permit for Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC, 
Harris County, Texas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an Order dated February 07, 2024, granting in part and denying in part 
a petition dated September 6, 2023, from Air Alliance Houston, Sierra 
Club, Environment Texas, and Environmental Integrity Project (the 
Petitioners). The petition requested that the EPA object to a Clean Air 
Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Texas Commission on 
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC, 
for its Pasadena Terminal located in Harris County, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Ehrhart, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Air Permits Section, (214) 665-2295, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abcec3d9c3cad9df85c1c4c5cadfc3cac5ebcedbca85ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="086d607a60697a7c26626766697c606966486d7869266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>. The 
final order and petition are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Air 
Alliance Houston, Sierra Club, Environment Texas, and Environmental 
Integrity Project dated September 6, 2023, requesting that the EPA 
object to the issuance of operating permit No. O3785, issued by TCEQ to 
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC for its Pasadena Terminal 
located in Harris

[[Page 16562]]

County, Texas. On February 07, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an 
order granting in part and denying in part the petition. The order 
itself explains the basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than May 6, 2024.

    Dated: February 26, 2024.
David Garcia,
Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2024-04409 Filed 3-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Colorado Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Colorado Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 26     | 30    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 49     | 44     | 56     | 61     | 62     | 74     | 102    | 122    | 123    | 42    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 180    | 208    | 283    | 607    | 765    | 624    | 870    | 981    | 855    | 623   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 427    | 235    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Phillip C. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael R. Jorgensen, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DOBI Medical
International, Inc.

Dated May 16, 2005


                                                    /s/Phillip C. Thomas
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Phillip C. Thomas
                                                    Chief Executive Officer



                                                    /s/Michael R. Jorgensen
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Michael R. Jorgensen
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
# Altura Zenith Fly tomorrows innovation today

# Unique Design Beyond the cutting edge

The Altura Zenith sets a precedent for the design of unmanned aircraft systems, by combining state of the art technol ogy with remarkably flat, compact and lightweight design. Starting from scratch enabled the generation of a radically novel idea: developing a multirotor aircraft system that can meet a wide variety of application requirements without compromising on design. 

# Curvaceous Aerodynamics The beautifully curved Altura Zenith is a feast for the eyes.

ASYMMETRIC MONOCOQUE CARBON AIRFRAME AVIATION GRADE COMPOSITE 3K CARBON MATERIALS SUPER FLAT AND COMPACT

DESIGN

# The efficiency of 4 and the Power of 8 Introducing a brand new Zenith family

Altura ZenithTM ATX4

The endurance winner 

## Altura ZenithTM ATX8 A true heavy lifter

PAYLOAD UP TO 1.4 KG FLIGHT TIME UP TO 45 MINUTES WINDSPEEDS UP TO 9 M/S LIGHT-RAIN PROOF PAYLOAD UP TO 2.9 KG FLIGHT TIME UP TO 35 MINUTES WINDSPEEDS UP TO 14 M/S LIGHT-RAIN PROOF 

# Brutal force Over 2400 watts of power

# The Altura GCS app Capable of great things 

# Easy to operate Convenience is key

You don’t need to be a skilled pilot The Zenith can be operated by tablet and RF joystick. Either way, your convenience is key. The intuitive tablet control interface is designed to facilitate swift and easy learning whilst the RF joystick facilitates stabilized precision flights. Combined with the built-in state of the art flight controller and airframe, the Zenith enables you to become an UAS pilot within the hour. 

# + AUTO TAKE-OFF GO HOME & LANDING GPS WAYPOINT NAVIGATION

BEGINNER FLIGHT MODE AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION CAMERA CONTROL FLIGHTSTATUS / TELEMETRY

# 3-axis gyro stabilization Ultimate Flexibility

The Zenith can be equipped with a wide variety of payloads, such as DSLR or cinema cameras, special sensors like thermal imaging, UV or multi spectral cameras, sniffers and microphones. There are no restrictions in flexibility. You can fit any camera you choose. The Zenith will suit your application. 

# Fit any payload you prefer The Zenith adapts to your demands

The 3-axis stabilized gimbal mount in combination with the special vibration dampeners enable crystal clear images that require virtually no post-production.The live HD downlink provides real-time access to the Zenith’s video feed via HD or SD monitor. This feature enables the operator on the ground to see what the camera is recording in the sky.

Aerialtronics offers a unique Full HD 1080i H.264 encrypted video link with a 2000-meter range. RANGE 2000 M DIGITAL ENCRYPTED HD H.261 

# HD Realtime aerial analyses The Altura Zenith: Your eyes in the sky

## Interested in Aerialtronics products, have any questions about our products or would like to request a flight demonstration? Feel free to contact us.

AERIALTRONICS INTERNATIONAL DR LELYKADE 20 2583CM - THE HAGUE THE NETHERLANDS CONTACT US T: +31 (0)70 322 3224 E: REQUEST@AERIALTRONICS.COM F: WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/AERIALTRONICSEUROPE

VISIT US ONLINE 

### WWW.AERIALTRONICS.COM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2192 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2192

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2011

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of 
  reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National 
 Guard who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to 
     perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reservist Debt 
Relief Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF AMENDMENT.

    Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief Act 
of 2008 (Public Law 110-438; 122 Stat. 5000) is amended by striking 
``3-year'' and inserting ``7-year''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen Linehan, certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual reportof Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-A;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicerunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports;

 

4.                                       Based on my knowledge and upon the annualcompliance statement included in the reports and required to be delivered tothe Indenture Trustee in accordance with the Sale and Servicing Agreement, andexcept as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligationsunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement; and

 

5.                                       The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the Servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the standards established by the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in thesereports.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2006 | By:                                    | /s/ Stephen Linehan |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                      | Stephen Linehan                        |
|                      | Assistant Vice President               |
|                      | Onyx Acceptance Financial  Corporation |

 

----
Contacts. WIThwhom outside the FAA hasthis proposal beendiscussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National BusilUl~S

Aircraft Association Eli Corti 

## bl3!tA ~ Rl'giomll Airline Associantlll DiIV£::Loiterer 

# k/;/oc(

- Aircraft Owners & Pilofs Assoti:ltion Robert H:lckmall 

# f/3J04 

# - ATA Craig Fabiall 

# hhJt1j - ATA 

## xl Lopez 

# (,,1»64 - 09/29106
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         985,527
<SECURITIES>                                 1,724,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,310)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,937,159
<PP&E>                                       2,398,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                 309,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,341,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          544,647
<BONDS>                                      4,365,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,071,401
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,402,782
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,074,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,341,927
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               470,753
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,124,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (609,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (609,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (609,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.33)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126902) pertaining to the Pike Holdings, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan A, Pike Holdings, Inc.2002 Stock Option Plan B, and Pike Electric Corporation 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan ofPike Electric Corporation, formerly Pike Holdings, Inc., of our report dated September 13, 2005,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pike Electric Corporation included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005./s/ Ernst & Young LLPGreensboro, North Carolina