alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11214

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BARON ELDER, 

also known as Beno,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC Nos. 4:98-CV-1085-Y

4:96-CR-25-28-Y

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Baron Elder appeals the district court’s denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which challenged his conviction for

conspiring to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute. He

argues that his sentence is illegal under Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000), and that the district court erred in denying

him leave to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to add a claim
No. 00-11214

-2-

pursuant to Apprendi. Elder’s argument is unavailing. Apprendi

does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. See

United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Ex parte COOK.

No. 26683.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

.WOODLEY, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of a district judge remanding appellant to the custody of the Sheriff of Tarrant County, to be delivered to the custody of agents of the State of Georgia ttnder an executive warrant issued by the Governor of Texas.

The evidence heard by the District Judge is not found in the record, and the executive warrant is sufficient to authorize the extradition.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Lower 48 States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Lower 48 States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 46    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 188    | 206    | 138    | -596   | 439    | 1,050  | 286    | 748    | 761    | -574  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 857    | -903   |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 23.1




               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-45521 and No. 33-71614) pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option
Plan, the 1991 Stock Option Plan and the 1991 Non-Discretionary Stock Option
Plan of Communication Intelligence Corporation of our report dated February 28,
1995, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Communication Intelligence Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1995.

                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
November 12, 1996
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

156) IV-E-29 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56 PM Sheet 156 of 242 
P.2 

I " 

k UNITED STATES ENV IRON MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

, 

MAR I 19881 OFFICE OF , 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

EPA/Loral Systems Group Meeting Regarding Bladder 

Tanks 

Jean Schwendeman, Mechanical Engineer M/j!iiA/Vfl "%f*L1 

Standards Development and Support Branch jJ^' \~r^ 

,^e4^^ 

Public Docket A-87-11 f 

Glenn W. Passavant, Senior Project Engineer JZWA*V»\. W ^UAU* ^ 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Chester J. France, Chief 

Standards Development a Branch 

On January 20, 1988 representatives of EPA's Office of 

Mobile Sources met with the staff of Loral Systems Group, a 

fuel cell manufacturer, in Rockmart, Georgia. The purpose of 

EPA's bladder tank project and to 

possible materials, designs and 

manufacturing capability. An attendees list is attached. 

the meeting was 

obtain Loral's 

to discuss 

ideas on 

EPA explained the need for control of refueling emissions 

as described in the recent NPRM. EPA also stated our view that 

in the longer term collapsible bladders could provide an 

alternative control technology for both refueling and 

evaporative emissions and could also provide safety benefits. 

EPA presented some design ideas and explained the testing which 

had been accomplished to date. 

Loral discussed the automotive bladder development work 

they have done in the past for the major auto companies. This 

included a fairly extensive amount of testing in the early 

1970's to develop both crash-resistant bladders and bladders 

designed for emission control purposes. They provided EPA with 

some confidential photos of these designs and copies of their 

test results. Loral suggested using a nitrile/PVC blend 

possibly laminated with a nylon barrier film. They also 
P.3 

suggested a^ "floating-roof" type design, which would basically 

be a diaphragm within the tank which would float on the surface 

of the fuel.! 

Loral estimated that they could be set-up to manufacture 

bladders with as little as a six month lead time, depending on 

production volume. They also stated that overhead ,and labor 

costs may have a greater effect on the cost of a finished 

bladder than the bladder material itself does. 

Attachment 
P.4 

EPA/LORAL Meeting 

January 20, 1988 

Glenn Passavant EPA 

Jean Schwendeman EPA 

Keith Robinson Loral 

Bob Sutton Loral 

Bill Duvall Loral
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 21, 2006
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-129751,
333-129757, and 333-129758; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-137671 and 333-141512) of IHS Inc. of our reports dated
January 23, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IHS Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of IHS Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 30, 2007.

|                                  |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Denver, Colorado
January 23, 2008 |  |                      

---





QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-16;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.   Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 23135.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1945.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1945.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to life imprisonment under the habitual criminal statute.

The proceeding is regular and the evidence is sufficient. Three bills of exception are presented in the case, upon which we are asked to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The appellant was not represented by counsel on the trial of his case and while the Assistant County Attorney was testifying in behalf of the State in presenting a written confession, the appellant sought to examine him. The questions which he asked were not questions but statements of fact and they elicited from the District Attorney the remark which the bill seeks to bring before us on a complaint that it had reference to his failure to testify. No exception was taken to the remark at the time. Appellant employed counsel, filed a motion for new trial, and introduced evidence which, among other things, sought to raise the question and give basis for a bill of exception. It is our conclusion that the bill at that time could not bring the question before us and we make no comment on the merits of the bill in the event timely objection had been made.

Bill of Exception Number Two complains of the introduction of the written confession. This bill is in a similar situation as Bill Number One. No objection was made to the introduction of the confession at the time it was presented. *178No evidence was introduced on the trial of the case to contradict the voluntary character of the statement. It was sought to introduce this evidence on motion for a new trial. No error could be presented based on the introduction of evidence at this time.

Bill Number Three raises a question of law as to the sufficiency of the prior convictions to support the life sentence. One of the prior convictions was for transporting whiskey. At the time of the former conviction this was a felony. Since that time the law has been amended so that the offense would be a misdemeanor. It is now contended that, because of such amendment, the prior conviction would not support a life sentence. The contention will not be sustained. Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. See also Garrett v. State, 129 Tex.Cr.R. 616, 91 S.W.2d 727.

Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2278 

To limit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for 

United States Armed Forces in support of North Atlantic Treaty Organization Operation Unified Protector with respect to Libya, unless otherwise specifically authorized by law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2011 

Mr. ROONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To limit the use of funds appropriated to the Department 

of Defense for United States Armed Forces in support 

of North Atlantic Treaty Organization Operation Unified 

Protector with respect to Libya, unless otherwise specifically authorized by law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2278 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DE2 FENSE FUNDS FOR UNITED STATES ARMED 

3 FORCES IN SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATION 

4 UNIFIED PROTECTOR WITH RESPECT TO 

5 LIBYA. 

6 (a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds appropriated or 

7 otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be 

8 obligated or expended for United States Armed Forces in 

9 support of North Atlantic Treaty Organization Operation 

10 Unified Protector with respect to Libya, unless otherwise 

11 specifically authorized by law. 

12 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—The limitation on funds under 

13 subsection (a) does not apply with respect to— 

14 (1) search and rescue; 

15 (2) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnais16 sance; 

17 (3) aerial refueling; and 

18 (4) operational planning. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibits 10.2


 





AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”)
to the Employment Agreement dated as of June 23, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and between Southern National
Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company) and R. Roderick Porter (the “Executive”), shall be effective
as of the 18th day of April, 2019.


 


		1.	Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:



 


“(b)Term. Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Company hereby employs Executive, and Executive hereby
accepts such employment, for the term commencing on the Effective Date and, unless otherwise earlier terminated pursuant to Section
4 hereof, expiring on December 31, 2019 (the “Term”). If the Term expires and the parties agree that Executive
will remain employed by the Company but do not enter into a new employment agreement, then such employment shall be at-will and
this Agreement will be of no further force and effect, except that Section 6 hereof, as well as any other provisions of this Agreement
necessary to interpret or enforce Section 6 hereof, shall survive and continue to be in full force and effect in accordance with
their terms.”


 


		2.	Section 5(a), (b) and (c) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:



 


“5.Obligations
of the Company Upon Termination. Effective April 18, 2019, Executive shall be a participant in the Southern National Bancorp
of Virginia, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
Severance Plan, and, in the event of Executive’s qualifying termination under the Severance Plan, Executive shall be eligible
to receive severance benefits pursuant to the Severance Plan, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, in lieu of any severance
benefits under this Agreement.”


 


		3.	The Employment Agreement, as modified by the terms of this Amendment, shall continue in full force
and effect from and after the date of the adoption of this Amendment.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered on the day and year first above written.








 


 


	 	Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s Joe A. Shearin	 
	 	Name:	Joe A. Shearin	 
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ R. Roderick Porter	 
	 	R. RODERICK PORTER
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                 
|No chart available.                                                 
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Alaska Offshore Natural Gas Processed in Alaska (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | NA     |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, John Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)
The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, Chief Financial Officer

May
20, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 12, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00020

- CR

James LEGATE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1998CR6480

Honorable Melisa Skinner , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this c ourt’s memorandum opinion of this date, the appeal is

DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED on February 12, 2014

.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of February, 2014

.

_ ____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk