alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-J1
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-J1


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                              Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                              Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
| **NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details) - shares shares in Millions**                              | Jan. 29, 2023 | Jan. 30, 2022 | Jan. 31, 2021 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]**                           |          |          |          |
| Maximum number of potentially dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting of contingently issuable PSU awards | 0.2           | 0.2           | 0.2           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Maximum number of potentially dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting of contingently issuable PSU awards
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_MaximumNumberOfPotentiallyDilutiveSharesThatCouldBeIssuedUponVestingOfContingentlyIssuablePSUAwards**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 9,  2005 |   | /s/Douglas G. Bryant          |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                        |   | **Douglas G.  Bryant**        |
|                        |   | ***Chief Financial Officer*** |

 

----
EXHIBIT 15



Acknowledgement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in



(i)

Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-73803), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Employee Savings and Retirement Plan,



(ii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-50841) and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59602), each of which relate to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,



(iii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59101), which relates to the Voluntary Investment Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (Crystal Brands Division),



(iv)

Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-72959), Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-64564) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-47910), each of which relate to the 1973 Employees Stock Option Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation,



(v)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38698), Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-24057) and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-60793), each of which relate to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan,



(vi)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-29765), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan,



(vii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-41068), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan,



(viii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-109000), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan, and



(ix)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-125694), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Salaried Associates, Associates Investment Plan for Hourly Associates and Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico



of our report dated November 20, 2006 with respect to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q for the thirteen week period ended October 29, 2006.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part of the registration statements or post-effective amendments prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York

December 6, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2377
ELIZABETH ANN FLATER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nick erson, District Judge. (CA-94-632-WMN) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 11, 1996 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Ann Flater, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Lori Joan Dym, UNITED STATES POSTAL SE RVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Ann Flater appeals from the district court's grantof summary judgment for the Defendant in her Title VII case alleging discrimination based on gender. Specifically, Flater alleged that the United States Postal Service discriminated against her on account of her sex when they promoted a male employee to a position for which she had bid. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Flater v. Runyon , No. CA-94-632-WMN (D. Md. May 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 19, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414, 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a795557575f544e49145b4a4a5653595b4e535554497a595253145c48581455485d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a28e8c8c848f9592cf8091918d88828095888e8f92a1828988cf879383cf8e9386">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The Jim and Peggy Scott Trust, James L. Scott and Peggy A. 
Scott, as co-trustees, and Brad A. Lydon and Jana F. Lydon, all of 
Fontanelle, Iowa; and Jessica C. Christensen and Joshua J. Christensen, 
both of Greenfield, Iowa; as a group acting in concert, to retain 
voting shares of Greenfield Bancorporation, Ltd, and thereby indirectly 
retain voting shares of Union State Bank, both of Greenfield, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-04513 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2157 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2157

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System 
       lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULES FOR INYO NATIONAL FOREST LAND EXCHANGE.

    (a) Authority To Accept Lands Outside Boundaries of Inyo National 
Forest.--In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain 
National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo 
National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled ``Federal 
Parcel'' and dated June 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept 
for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California 
lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the 
maps titled ``DWP Parcel - Interagency Visitor Center Parcel'' and 
``DWP Parcel - Town of Bishop Parcel'' and dated June 2011, if the 
Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is 
desirable for National Forest System purposes.
    (b) Cash Equalization Payment; Use.--In an exchange described in 
subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash 
equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash 
equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the 
Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90-171 
(commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a) and shall be made 
available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to 
the National Forest System.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to grant the Secretary of Agriculture new land exchange 
authority. This section modifies the use of land exchange authorities 
already available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           (Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             15 U.S.C. Section 78m)



I, Deborah F. McLeod, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Chestatee Bancshares,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
         b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
         c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing similar functions):

         a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
         b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: April 27, 2007           BY:  /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
      --------------                --------------------------------------------
                                    Deborah F. McLeod, CFO and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


<PAGE>
#### DAMRON v. COLEMAN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

July 19, 1954.

Francis M. Burke, F. Dale Burke and W. A. Daugherty, Pikeville, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Earle V. Powell, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. A. Runyon, Commonwealth’s Atty., Pikeville, Kelsey E. Friend, County Atty., J. Ervin Sanders, Pikeville, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Following his indictment upon a charge of willful murder, Willard Damron made application to the circuit court of Pike County for bail pending trial. The application was denied, and Damron then filed his petition in the circuit court for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking by this means to secure release from jail upon reasonable bail. The circuit court dismissed the petition and Damron has appealed.

The only question is whether the proof of Damron’s guilt is sufficiently evident, or the presumption of his guilt sufficiently great, within the meaning of Section 16 of the Kentucky Constitution, so that the denial of bail by the circuit court cannot be considered capricious or arbitrary. Smith v. Henson, 298 Ky. 182, 182 S.W.2d 666.

Damron is accused of murdering one Clyde Jack Clements. A dismembered body, claimed to be that of Clements, was found in a shallow grave on March 31, 1954. There was evidence that the body had been in the ground at least six months. On May 1, 1953, Clements, who was in the county jail, was taken from the jail by Dam-ron, apparently under some arrangement Damron had made with the jailer. Clements was heard making protests against leaving the jail. A brown suit found on or near the body in the grave was identified as one which another inmate of the jail had given to Clements, and by means of a laundry mark on the suit it was established that the suit had been picked up at Damron’s home on August 11, 1953, and had been delivered back to Mrs. Damron on August *17114. There was no evidence of Clements having 'been seen after he left the jail on May 1, 1953, although a state policeman testified that the police had information that Clements had been “hiding out” at the home of Damron’s father.

In the trousers of the suit found near the body in the grave there were two social security cards, one in the name of a person not shown to have any connection with the case, and the other in the name of an uncle of Damron.

There was evidence that Clements had become indebted to Damron as a result of gambling the two men engaged in' when both were in jail in the early part of 1953.

It is our opinion that the foregoing facts do not constitute evident proof of Damron’s guilt nor create a great presumption of his guilt, and that the court abused its discretion in denying bail.

The judgment is reversed, with directions that Damron be granted reasonable bail to be fixed by the circuit court. The mandate will issue forthwith, without prejudice to the right of the appellee to file a petition for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57402-57403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science

[[Page 57403]]

Foundation announces the following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Date/Time: March 8-10, 2001, 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Rooms 1020 
and 1060, Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Thomas Fogwell, Program Director: (703) 292-
4878. David Kopriva, Program Director: (703) 292-4879. National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Fluid 
Dynamics Panel as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-24409 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Arturo Castelan and Gustavo Castelan v. Michael Gerard and 

Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate case number: 01-16-00463-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-22182

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Michael Gerard, has filed a Motion for Substitution of Counsel, seeking 

to substitute Karl D. Drews in place of Jason Oregon. Because the motion does not show 

that it was delivered to Gerard “in person or mailed—both by certified and by first-class 

mail” at his last known address, the motion is denied, without prejudice to refiling. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d).

By signing the motion, Karl D. Drews has appeared as counsel of record for 

Gerard. The Clerk of this Court is directed to note Drews’s appearance as counsel for 

Gerard on the docket of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 12, 2017