alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Walter H. COLEMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. TYLER STATE BANK & TRUST CO. et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 6209.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

April 5, 1946.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1946.

Roy C. Coffee, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest Goens, Leslie Neill, and Ben Goodwin, all of Tyler, and J. A. Mallory, of Lindale, for appellees.

HARVEY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Smith County, Texas, admitting to probate the will of Mrs. Eugenia Thweatt. It involves the same state of facts and the same questions of law, in part, as are set out in Highsmith v. Tyler State Bank & Trust Company, 194 S.W.2d 142, in which suit an opinion of this court written by Chief Justice Hall has been handed down this day. Both appeals arise out of the same trial in the court below. The controlling question presented in the appeal herein is whether the judgment rendered in the District Court of Smith County is void by reason of the fact that the *146plaintiff in error in such cause, Walter H. Coleman, a defendant below, did not join in a waiver of a jury trial with the other parties plaintiff and defendant.

Inasmuch as this question is discussed and passed upon in the case of Highsmith v. Tyler State Bank & Trust Company, and is decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error herein, we adopt such opinion in the inátant case. By reason of the conclusion reached in the above styled case, the judgment of the trial court in this appeal is affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Wayne M. Rehberger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and     
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: November 13, 2002

/s/ Wayne M. RehbergerWayne M. RehbergerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, George Drazenovic, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.
      for the annual period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.                                                                      

Dated: October 12, 2007





*/s/ George Drazenovic*
  George Drazenovic 
  Secretary, Treasurer and Director 
  Principal Financial Officer and 
  Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sun Cal Energy,
Inc. and will be retained by Sun Cal Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# Úřední věstník L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0626 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | L 198 |
| | |
| České vydání | Právní předpisy | Ročník 616. srpna 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0626

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

L 198

České vydání

Právní předpisy

Ročník 616. srpna 2018

---

| Obsah | | II   Nelegislativní akty | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY |
| | * | Oznámení o vstupu v platnost Protokolu mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy a Libanonskou republikou, kterým se zřizuje mechanismus pro urovnávání sporů týkajících se obchodních ustanovení Evropsko-středomořské dohody zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy na jedné straně a Libanonskou republikou na straně druhé | 1 |

Obsah

II   Nelegislativní akty

Strana

MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY

*

Oznámení o vstupu v platnost Protokolu mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy a Libanonskou republikou, kterým se zřizuje mechanismus pro urovnávání sporů týkajících se obchodních ustanovení Evropsko-středomořské dohody zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy na jedné straně a Libanonskou republikou na straně druhé

1

| CS | Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.
  Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička. |
| --- | --- |

CS

Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.

Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička.

---

II Nelegislativní akty

MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY

| 6.8.2018 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | L 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2018

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

L 198/1

---

Oznámení o vstupu v platnost Protokolu mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy a Libanonskou republikou, kterým se zřizuje mechanismus pro urovnávání sporů týkajících se obchodních ustanovení Evropsko-středomořské dohody zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy na jedné straně a Libanonskou republikou na straně druhé

Protokol mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy a Libanonskou republikou, kterým se zřizuje mechanismus pro urovnávání sporů týkajících se obchodních ustanovení Evropsko-středomořské dohody zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy na jedné straně a Libanonskou republikou na straně druhé, podepsaný v Bruselu dne 11. listopadu 2010, vstoupí v platnost v souladu s jeho článkem 23 dnem 1. září 2018.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7180
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES BENNIE HUNT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-177-P) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 28, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Bennie Hunt appeals the district court’s order denying his Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt , No. CR-88-177-P (W.D.N.C. July 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ephraim JOSEPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27377.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

No attorney on« appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*688PER CURIAM.

The possession of wine for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $250.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
      Abdoulline, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)       
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





By:
                /S/ Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                AbdoullinePresident,
                CEODate:
                August 13, 2008
n ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 07-0011 

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED 

DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE ORDER 

The Honorable John C. Brown, Judge of the District Court for the Eighteenth 

Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District 

Judge Mike Salvagni to assume jurisdiction of Gallatin County Cause No. 

DV-16-2023 -0001248-DK, Montanans Against Irresponsible Densification, LLC v. State 

of Montana. 

Judge Salvagni has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' Retirement 

System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has 

advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Eighteenth Judicial District Court with the 

above-listed matter. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Honorable Mike Salvagni, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active 

service in the District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District of the State of Montana, to 

assume judicial authority of Gallatin County Cause No. DV-16-2023-0001248-DK, 

Montanans Against Irresponsible Densification, LLC v. State of Montana, and is hereby 

authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions. and orders, including 

final resolution of said matter. 

2. For all active service, Judge Salvagni shall be paid the salary compensation to 

which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be 

reimbursed. 

FD 

DEC 2 6 2023 

Bowen Greenw000 

C. • - Gi ur, 

12/27/2023

Case Number: PR 07-0011
3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of Court of the Eighteenth 

Judicial District with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel of record in the 

above-listed matter. 

4. A copy of this Order shall also be furnished to the Honorable John C. Brown, the 

Honorable Mike Salvagni, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme Court 

Administrator. 

The ChiefJustice enters this Order pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of the 1972 

Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation 

thereof. 

DATED this e--73- day of December, 2023. 

Chief Justice 

2
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-141430,333-138048, 333-136657, 333-126942, and 333-126943 on Forms S-8 ofour reports dated February 29,2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of ITC Holdings Corp.,and the effectiveness of ITC Holdings Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ITC Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1319** 

PHILLIP SMITH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNION COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION , Defendant

– Appellee , and
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION , Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv - 00707

- RJC

- DCK )

Submitted : March 30, 2016 Decided: April 14, 2016

Before AGEE , WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kirk J. Angel, THE ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Katherine T. Armstrong, William C. Robinson, ROBINSON, ELLIOTT & SMITH, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Phillip Smith appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment to Smith’s former employer in this Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) action. Smith raises two issues on appeal : (1) whether the district court improperly credited
the employer’s evidence and failed to properly evaluate evidence offered by Smith regarding pre

- offer medical inquiry under the

ADA ; and (2) w hether the district court failed to view key
evidence in the light most favorable to Smith in granting summary judgment

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Union Cty. Bd

. of Ed uc . , No.
3:13

- cv - 00707

- RJC

- DCK (W.D.N.C. March 5, 2015) ( stating reasons
on the record a t the hearing on March 4, 2015); see Myers v.
Hose , 50 F.3d 278, 282 (4th Cir. 1995) (finding that a litigant’s medical conditions precluded him from being a bus
driver in his ADA discrimination action ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40651

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL ARELLANO-BERUMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-648

--------------------

February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Juan Manuel Arellano-Beruman appeals his

conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a) and (b). Arellano contends that the district court

erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because his

underlying deportation proceedings violated his right to due

process.

Arellano concedes that the only issue raised in this appeal

is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. BenitezVillafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 120
No. 99-40651 

-2-

S. Ct. 838 (2000). The decision of the district court therefore

is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6425 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

GILBERT HARRIS, JR., a/k/a Butchie Huell, a/k/a Butchie, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:04-cr-00762-TLW-1) 

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Gilbert Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Gilbert Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and 

reducing his sentence for a drug offense to 120 months.* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Harris, No. 4:04-cr-00762-TLW-1 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 23, 

2009; entered Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

 Harris was originally sentenced to 140 months for the drug 

offense and sixty months, consecutive, for a related firearm 

offense. His sentence for the drug offense was reduced to 120 

months. He remains subject to the consecutive sixty-month 

sentence.
Exhibit 4.338

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 166425 dated October 31, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

data communication services excluding data communication services for

the purposes of voice data communication

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 31, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated June 26, 2018 No. 457-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
|    |                                                                              |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ITC Holdings Corp.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |
|  /s/ Joseph L. Welch                             |
| Joseph L. Welch President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Brown, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified *834on the law and as modified affirmed, and matter remitted to Oneida County Court for resentencing, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant was convicted of eight counts of assault in the second degree and one count of attempted assault in the second degree, and was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to concurrent indeterminate terms of 10 years to life on each count. We disagree with his contention on appeal that his sentence was harsh and excessive; however, because attempted assault in the second degree is not a violent felony offense *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [a]-[d]), we find *sua sponte*that defendant’s sentence on that count is illegal *(see,*Penal Law § 70.08). Thus, resentencing on that count is required.

We have examined defendant’s remaining issues on appeal, including his *pro se*issues, and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.— assault, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow (Parenthetical) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | Mar. 31, 2014 | Mar. 31, 2013 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow [Abstract]**                                                      |          |          |
| Non equity component of allowance for funds used during construction                                     | $ 367         | $ 472         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfCashFlowsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Non equity component of allowance for funds used during construction
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtr_NonEquityComponentOfAllowanceForFundsUsedDuringConstruction**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |