alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consentto the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-132065 onForm S-8 of our report dated March 16, 2007, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. andsubsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standard No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting forDefined Benefit and Pension and Other Postretirement Plans)* and ourreport dated March 16, 2007 on management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| Parsippany,  New Jersey       |
| March 16,  2007               |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4514 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4514

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of 
                     Difenoconazole and Mefenoxam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of 
                     Difenoconazole and Mefenoxam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF DIFENOCONAZOLE AND MEFENOXAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.53 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain mixtures of 
Difenoconazole and Mefenoxam) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### DELAWARE *&*H. R. CORPORATION et al. v. PENN ANTHRACITE MINING CO. SAME v. CHRISTIAN FEIGENSPAN.

Nos. 6348, 6349.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Aug. 2, 1937.

Alexander H. Elder, of New York City, for appellants.

W. A. Skinner, of-Scranton, Pa., and Edwin A. Lucas and Drinker, Biddle & Reath, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before THOMPSON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments of the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Complaints were brought before the Interstate Commerce Commission by the appellees, miners and shippers of coal, against the appellants, common carriers, in which it was alleged that the freight rates charged the appellees upon their shipments of coal were unreasonable, excessive, discriminatory, and unduly prejudicial. The Commission found “that the rates assailed were, are, and for the future will be, unreasonable to the extent that they exceeded, exceed, or may exceed $2.39 on prepared and $2.27 on the. smaller sizes.”

The appellants complied with so much of the order of the Commission as required a reduction of future rates but refused to comply with the reparation orders. The appellees filed petitions in the District Court for enforcement of the Commission’s reparation orders under the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act (section 16 (1, 2), 49 U.S.C.A. § 16 (1) and (2). Verdicts having been returned in favor of the appellees, the court entered judgments thereon. See Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Delaware & H. R. Corp. (D.C.) 16 F.Supp. 732.

The learned judge of the District Court analyzed the evidence and the law in an able and comprehensive opinion. We find no errors and affirm on the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Judgments affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J UA N M I GU EL M ENCHACO- LOPE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50120 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c r - 0 4 7 8 2 - WQH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia W i l l i a m Q . H a y e s , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , a n d C A L L A H A N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . Juan M i gu el M enchaco-Lo pez app ea l s f rom the 36 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng a deport ed al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed St a t e s , i n v i o l a t i o n o f

8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50120 2 M e nc ha c o- L ope z c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by f a i l i ng t o a ddr e s s hi s pol i c y c ha l l e nge t o the i l l e ga l r e e ntryG ui de l i ne r e qui r i ng a si xt ee n-l evel enhancem entfor c ert ai n p ri or conv i ct i on s, and thatthe se nt ence i m po se d i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otprocedural l y e rr , as the re cord ref

l ec t s thati tconsi dere d M enchaco-Lo pez’ s argum ent s bef ore i m pos i ng as e nt e nc e tha tw a s 21 m onths be l ow the a dvi s oryG ui de l i ne s r a nge , a nd f ound the c i r c um s t a nc e s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o j us t i f

yas e nt e nc e l ow e rtha n the one im p o s e d . Se e U

ni te d State s v . Ay ala- N

i c anor , 65 9 F . 3d 74 4, 75 2-53 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 1 ) . F u rth e r , th e s e n te n c e b e lo w th e G u id e lin e s r an g e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly r e a s onabl e unde rthe t ot a l i ty of the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd i n l i ghtof the s e nt e nc i ng f a c to r s s e t f

o rth in 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) . See G al l v. U ni ted Stat es , 552 U . S . 38, 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30653 Summary Calendar

RELIABLE HOME HEALTH CARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PALMETTO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (USDC No. 00-CV-2445)

_______________________________________________________ November 20, 2001 Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court by its order entered May 2, 2001.2



### AFFIRMED.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 13663
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MICHAEL COTTONE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21

- cr

- 00131

- SDM

- AEP

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13663 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 10/08/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13663

Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM , and G RANT , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Michael Cottone in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Cottone’s conviction and sentence ar e AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 23-13663 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 10/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the issuer's
condensed  financial  statements  at  February  28,  1999  (Unaudited),  and  is
qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.


</LEGEND>

        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,961
<SECURITIES>                                    62,942
<RECEIVABLES>                                      828
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,574
<PP&E>                                          22,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,437
<OTHER-SE>                                    (319,482)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,316
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,805)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.001)

        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-431-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Rescheduling 
of Conference

January 31, 2000.
    Take notice that due to closure of the Federal Government because 
of inclement weather, the conference in the above-captioned proceeding 
originally scheduled for Tuesday, January 25, 2000, has been 
rescheduled for Thursday, February 10, 2000, beginning at 10:00 a.m., 
in Hearing Room No. 1, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2458 Filed 2-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4500 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4500

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-CHLORO-1-INDANONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.44 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Chloro-1-indanone) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2
I, Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Molecular
Evolution, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;


5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


    Date August 5, 2003           By:  /s/ Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.
                                       Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Secretary
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of 4C Controls Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald Sullivan, Acting Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      March 31, 2008






By:
            /s/
                Gerald SullivanName:
            Gerald
                SullivanTitle:
            Acting
                Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Robert J. Evans, a director and Secretary/Treasurer of Silver Butte Co., Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  April 9, 2007  By    /s/ Robert J. Evans  Robert J. Evans, Secretary/Treasurer and a Director
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Texas--RRC District 6 Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Texas--RRC District 6 Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | 60     | 10    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 20     | 14     | 16     | 15     | 3      | 17     | 18     | 10     | 12    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 11     | 16     | 32     | 18     | 40     | 14     | 15     | 10     | 19     | 7     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
##### 



Exhibit 10.40
 Assumption Agreement and Fourth Amendment  to  Loan And Security Agreement
 ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND FOURTH AMENDMENT SILICON VALLEY BANK Bank EV3
ENDOVASCULAR, INC. EV3 INTERNATIONAL, INC. MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. Existing Borrowers th FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. New Borrower th Borrowers
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 D.
 E.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1




---



##### 



1. Definitions.
 2. Assumption; Addition of Additional Borrower.
 3. Grant of Security Interest.
 4. Cross-Corporate Guaranty; Perfection Certificate.
 5. Existing Borrowers Indemnity to New Borrower.
 2




---



##### 



6. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
 6.1 Exhibit D (Compliance Certificate)
 7. Limitation of Amendments.
 7.1
 7.2
 8. Representations and Warranties.
 8.1
 8.2
 8.3
 8.4
 8.5
 8.6
 3




---



##### 



8.7
 9. Fees and Expenses.
 10. Counterparts.
 [Signatures continued to next page]
 4




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 Borrowers:EV3 ENDOVASCULAR, INC.
    
    
    
    EV3 INTERNATIONAL, INC.By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. SpanglerName:
    
    Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Patrick D. SpanglerTitle:
    
    Vice President and
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    TreasurerChief Financial OfficerMICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC.
    
    
    
    FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Patrick D. SpanglerName:
    
    Patrick D. Spangler
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Patrick D. SpanglerTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 Bank:SILICON VALLEY BANKBy
    
    /s/ John KinzerName:
    

John KinzerTitle:
    
    Director
 5