13690 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices 

10For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

11See Order, 81 FR at 64434. 

12See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

13See Order, 81 FR at 64434. 

1See Steel Propane Cylinders from Thailand: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 60921 

(September 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 12, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Steel Propane Cylinders from Thailand; 

2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Steel Propane Cylinders from the People’s 

Republic of China and Thailand: Amended Final 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Hyundai or POSCO for which the 

reviewed companies did not know that 

the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (i.e., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States.10 In such instances, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.11

For Dongbu, the company that was 

not selected for individual examination, 

we assigned an assessment rate based on 

the weighted average of the cash deposit 

rates calculated for Hyundai and 

POSCO, excluding any which are zero, 

de minimis, or determined entirely on 

the basis of facts available.12

Cash Deposit Instructions 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on, or after, the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for the companies listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed companies not covered in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent segment for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 20.33 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 16, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, Performing the Non-exclusive 

Functions and Duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Comparing Hyundai’s Home 

Market Sales of Non-Prime Merchandise 

to U.S. Sales of Prime Merchandise 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply its Quarterly Cost Methodology to 

Hyundai 

Comment 3: Whether to Include Hyundai’s 

Home Market and U.S. Billing 

Adjustments in its Margin Calculation 

Comment 4: Whether to Increase U.S. Price 

by the Amount of Countervailing Duties 

Imposed to Offset Hyundai’s Export 

Subsidy 

Comment 5: Ministerial Errors in POSCO’s 

Margin Calculation 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–03741 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–839] 

Steel Propane Cylinders From 

Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

Sahamitr Pressure Container Plc. (also 

known as Sahamitr Pressure Container 

Public Company Limited) (SMPC) made 

sales of subject merchandise in the 

United States at prices below normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable February 23, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 6, 2023, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

2021–2022 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel 

propane cylinders from Thailand and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

On December 12, 2023, we extended the 

deadline for these final results to 

February 16, 2024.2 For a complete 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is steel propane cylinders from 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices 13691 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 41703 (August 15, 

2019) (Order). 

5For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

6See Steel Propane Cylinders from Thailand: 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value, 84 FR 29168, 29169 (June 21, 2019). 

Thailand. A full description of the scope 

of the Order is contained in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised, and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, is attached 

as an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade/gov/public/

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made certain adjustments to 

the margin calculations for these final 

results, as detailed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this administrative 

review, Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the period August 1, 

2021, through July 31, 2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Sahamitr Pressure Container Plc 2.17 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed to interested 

parties for these final results within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 

351.212(b), Commerce has determined, 

and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

final results of review. Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the 

respondent reported the entered value 

of its U.S. sales, we calculated importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the sales for which entered 

value was reported. Where the 

respondent did not report entered value, 

we calculated a per-unit assessment rate 

for each importer by dividing the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales made to that importer by 

the total quantity associated with those 

sales. To determine whether an 

importer-specific, per-unit assessment 

rate is de minimis, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also calculated 

an importer-specific ad valorem ratio 

based on estimated entered values. 

Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by SMPC for 

which the reviewed company did not 

know that the merchandise it sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.5

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). The final 

results of this administrative review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise under review and for 

future cash deposits of estimated 

antidumping duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective for all shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for SMPC will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin that is established in the final 

results of this review (except if that rate 

is de minimis, in which situation the 

cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

merchandise exported by a company not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer has been 

covered in a prior complete segment of 

this proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will be the company-specific rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

and exporters will continue to be 10.77 

percent ad valorem,6 the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
13692 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Notices 

1See Utility Scale Wind Towers from Canada, 

Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, and the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 

FR 52546 (August 26, 2020) (Order), corrected in 

Utility Scale Wind Towers from Canada, Indonesia, 

the Republic of Korea, and the Socialist Republic 

of Vietnam: Notice of Correction to the 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 56213 (September 

11, 2020). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 50840 (August 2, 2023). 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2023. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

71829 (October 18, 2023). 

5 Id., 88 FR at 71832. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of Customs and 

Border Protection Data Query,’’ dated October 24, 

2023. 

7See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Comments on CBP Data 

and Respondent Selection’’ dated October 31, 2023. 

8See Acciona’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment 

Certification,’’ dated November 17, 2023. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review,’’ dated December 7, 2023. 

10See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4154 

(January 24, 2023). 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

12See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 16, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, Performing the Non-exclusive 

Functions and Duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Remove Certain Non-Propane Cylinders 

from SMPC’s Home Market Sales 

Database 

Comment 2: Whether to Revise the 

Capping of U.S. Freight Revenue 

Comment 3: Differential Pricing Analysis 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–03740 Filed 2–22–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–823] 

Utility Scale Wind Towers From Spain: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on utility 

scale wind towers (wind towers) from 

Spain for the period of review (POR) 

August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable February 23, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Maciuba, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0413. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 26, 2020, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on wind towers from Spain.1

On August 2, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the AD order 

on wind towers from Spain.2 On August 

31, 2022, the Wind Tower Trade 

Coalition (the petitioner) submitted a 

timely request that Commerce conduct 

an administrative review.3

On October 18, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of administrative 

review with respect to imports of wind 

towers from Spain in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i).4 This review covers 

subject merchandise exported and/or 

produced by Acciona Energia, Acciona 

Windpower S.A., Industrial 

Barranquesa, S.A., Gamesa Energy 

Transmission S.A., GE Renewable 

Energy, GRI Renewable Industries S.L., 

Haizea Wind Group, Iberdrola, S.A., 

Iberdrola Renovables Energia S.A., 

Nordex SE, Nordex Energy Spain S.A., 

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy 

Inc., Vestas Eolica S.A.U., Vestas Eolica, 

S.A., Vestas Manufacturing Spain 

S.L.U., Vestas Control Systems Spain 

S.L.U., Vestas Wind Systems A/S, and 

Windar Renovables, S.A.5 On October 

24, 2023, we placed on the record U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

data for entries of wind towers from 

Spain during the POR, showing no 

reviewable POR entries and invited 

interested parties to comment.6

On October 31, 2023, the petitioner 

filed comments with respect to the CBP 

data.7 On November 17, 2023, Acciona 

Generacio ́n Renovable, S.A. (formerly 

Acciona Energia, S.A.) (Acciona) 

submitted a no-shipment certification, 

indicating that it had no exports or sales 

of subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.8

On December 7, 2023, Commerce 

notified all interested parties of its 

intent to rescind the instant review 

because there were no reviewable, 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise by any of the companies 

subject to this review during the POR 

and invited interested parties to 

comment.9 We did not receive any 

comments. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is 

Commerce’s practice to rescind an 

administrative review of an AD order 

when there are no reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which liquidation is suspended.10

Normally, upon completion of an 

administrative review, the suspended 

entries are liquidated at the AD 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.11 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct CBP 

to liquidate at the AD assessment rate 

calculated for the review period.12 As 

noted above, there were no entries of 

subject merchandise for the companies 

subject to this review during the POR. 

Accordingly, in the absence of 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR, we are 

hereby rescinding this administrative 

review, in its entirety, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Antidumping duties shall be 

assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of this rescission notice in 

the Federal Register. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1