alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(b)**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
     I, Steven P. Kovac, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interphase Corporation (the “Company”);  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theAudit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: March 18, 2005   Signature: /s/ Steven P. Kovac               Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 42 (Friday, March 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04471]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 12:30 p.m. EST, Friday, March 8, 2024.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement and examination matters. In the 
event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place 
of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: February 28, 2024.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-04471 Filed 2-28-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6071** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GOKHAN BERGAL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 00012

- JKB

- 5 )

Submitted : April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gokhan Bergal, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gokhan Bergal appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to appeal the court’s August 6, 2015, order denying his motions for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). Bergal did not seek an extension of time until November 13, nearly two months after the expiration of
t he excusable neglect period
. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), (4); cf. Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (holding that prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on date he delivered it to prison officials for mailing to court). Because the distr ict court was without authority to grant Bergal’s motion, we affirm the court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the dec isional process.
AFFIRMED
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Arkansas Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Arkansas Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 165    | 174    | 218    | 233    | 248    | 206    | 217    | 1,434  | 1,392 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,346  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-024;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|            |  |                                                                 
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|May 7, 2009 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date        |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 22, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 873 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 13100

________________ 

### Wanda Mota , Appellant,

vs. 

### Miami - Dade County, etc. , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, David C. Miller , Judge. Wanda Mota, in proper person

. Gera ldine Bonzon

- Keenan, Miami

- Dade County Attorney, and Joni A. Mosely , Assistant County Attorney , for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. EMAS, J

.2 Wanda Mota appeals the dismissal of her complaint for negligence against Miami

- Dade County, wh ich was based upon her failure to either timely obtain counsel , or to notify the court of her intent to represent herself, following the withdrawal of her prior counsel. We reverse and remand because there is nothing in the record evidencing that Mota was sent proper notice of the hearing on her attorney’s motion to withdraw. Nor is there anything in the record to refute Mota’s averment, made in the court below , that she did not timely receive notice of th at hearing. 1 Therefore, it was error for the trial court to dismiss Mota’s complaint based upon Mota’s failure to timely comply with the order granting the motion to withdraw. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.505(f )(1); Saenz v. Pena , 754 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that where motion to withdraw is filed without notice to client, in violation of the mandatory notice requirements of rule 2.060(j), 2 the court should have granted the motion to set aside lat er - entered judgment against the client); Agape Charter School, Inc. v. Summit Charter School, Inc. , 254 So. 3d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (noting: “Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.505(f)(1) contains a mandatory requirement that an

1 We note the commendable concession by Miami

- Dade County that there is nothing in the record to refute Mota’s contention that she did not timely receive notice of the hearing on her counsel’s motion to withdraw.

2 Renumbered as Rule 2.505.3 attorney fi ling a motion to withdraw timely serve both the motion and the notice of hearing on his or her client at the client’s known address ” and that this “‘notice requirement implicates due process concerns of notice and opportunity to be heard; obviously, then, the notice and motion must be timely and must afford the client an opportunity to respond’”) (quoting Garden v. Garden , 834 So. 2d 190, 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc.,
hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.



|                   |                     |                                        
|------------------ | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|August 5, 2005Date |                     | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|                   | David H. Fleischman
|                   |                     | Chief Financial Officer,               
|                   |                     | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
Docket No. FAA-2012-0264

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8/30/11

Regional Airline Association 8/30/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/30/11

ATA Joe White 8/30/11
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Dresser-Rand Group Inc.(the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theyear ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Vincent R. Volpe Jr., President,Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ VINCENT R. VOLPE JR.           Vincent R. Volpe Jr.     President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate: April 4, 2006
## SN· A-P Date: 

## UJ~es~ **~t4/** 

## 61 **s- ~**  3 ·.3upYrl Meeting: 

# DDvO C..h<YnUJ),__() Rule(s) Discussed: Written Materials? Yes/No Name Organization Phone Number ;(12....\Ji\1\.

**e...vo.e** 

## -:t aw **Jo~--~l9 -3L-/~**  **~** 

## ,:s:\N'- **fi~\~** 

## JJow

**~d.~** L/:fCf -34 

### (..,c. -._..)

**D~ 6o~**  

### J:J~ **~0** d-. 

### 4 '). '1 -3 '{ 

### r,c. ._) 

# now **~-«;)q-s~** 

### ~v..As **D~L.\.Jl.** 

### I
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rose Gentry, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The evidence in this circumstantial evidence case was not legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of assault in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 120.10 [3]). The proof, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, shows that the victim sustained serious physical injury as a result of “severe, blunt trauma to the head”. The record further reveals that defendant placed the victim, her 18-month-old son, on a mattress located on the floor of his upstairs bedroom. She returned downstairs to watch television. The codefendant, Jerry Kloster, was then asleep on a sofa in the living room. Defendant put her daughter to bed and went to the bathroom to take a shower. She was still in the bathroom when Kloster asked her to get him ice cream. When she returned to the living room with the ice cream, Kloster told her that he had heard the victim cry out in an unusual manner. Defendant did not hear the cry. Kloster and defendant went upstairs to investigate. Kloster entered the victim’s room; defendant remained outside. Kloster placed the victim back on the mattress, said the room was hot, opened a window and turned on a fan. Kloster and defendant returned to the downstairs area. A short time later Kloster said he did not think the victim was "alright upstairs”. He went back to the victim’s room, discovered that the victim was not breathing properly and told defendant to call for an ambulance. These facts taken together, in combination with the circumstantial evidence of Kloster’s guilt and the manner in which the victim’s injury apparently was inflicted, “are not inconsistent with defendant’s innocence, nor does the *898evidence exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of innocence” *(People v Way,*59 NY2d 361, 363).

Further, upon our review of the evidence and " 'weighting] the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the relative strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony’ ”, we conclude that "the trier of fact has failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). Accordingly, we modify the judgment by reversing defendant’s conviction of assault in the first degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon. (Appeal from judgment of Lewis County Court, Merrell, J.— assault, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Charles H. MARSHALL, Administrator of the Estate of Josephine B. Marshall, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 403.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 28, 1937.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall .Key, J. Louis Monarch, and John G. Remey, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

James L. Banks, Jr., of New York City, for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

*1011PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed on the authority of Welch v. Hassett, 90 F.(2d) 833, decided June 1, 1937 (C.C.A.1), and Bullard v. Commissioner, 90 F.(2d) 144, decided May 25, 1937 (C.C.A.7).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: February 9, 2006 | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant         |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    | **Douglas G. Bryant**         |
|                    | ***Chief Financial Officer*** |
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.,
pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Accounting Officer of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.
hereby certify that BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.

Date:  May 20, 2003

(signed)_____________________
Edward Alexander
/s/ Edward Alexander
Chief Accounting Officer of
BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC. and will be retained by
BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>




                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24
                                2005-1 AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                    STEELCASE
                       BENEFIT PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
                         (EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 1, 1999)
                        --------------------------------

          This 2005-1 Amendment to the STEELCASE BENEFIT PLAN FOR OUTSIDE
DIRECTORS ("Plan") is adopted by STEELCASE INC.

          Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Plan, Steelcase Inc. amends the Plan as
follows:

                                       A.

          Effective as of March 1, 1999, the last sentence of the second
paragraph of Section 4.1 is amended as follows:


This shall not apply to coordination with the dental benefit.

                                       B.

          Effective as of April 1, 2004, a new subsection (x) is added to
Section 8.7 to read as follows:


               (x) OBESITY TREATMENT. Charges for the medical and surgical
treatment of obesity in accordance with the Plan's medical policy for obesity
treatment.

                                       C.

          In all other respects, the Plan shall be unchanged.

          IN WITNESS OF WHICH, Steelcase Inc. has executed this 2005-1 Amendment
to the Plan.

                                    STEELCASE INC.


Dated:  March 31, 2004              By    Nancy W. Hickey
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Its Sr. Vice President, Global Strategic
                                       Resources & Chief Administrative Officer