alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 22,315
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25,181 | 28,950 | 33,403 | 36,520 | 39,933 | 35,230 | 35,213 | 41,990 | 47,053 | 47,107
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 38,212 | 44,418 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 10.22 

Change in Control AgreementAmendment

	Effective October 4, 2004, this Amendment amends theChange in Control Agreement (the "Agreement"), entered into as ofNovember 21, 2002 by and between Brett White, an individual ("Executive")and Corio, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

	For good and valuable consideration, the receipt andsufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.  Section 1.  Section 1 of the Agreement is herebydeleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"1.  	Benefits Upon a Change in Control.  If (i) duringthe term of this Agreement****and while Executive remains an employee of theCompany, the Company shall be subject to the consummation of a Change in Controland (ii) within one (1) year following such Change in Control the Companyterminates the employment of Executive involuntarily and without BusinessReasons or a Constructive Termination occurs, then in such case Executive shallbe entitled to receive the following:  (A) Executive's base salary andvacation accrued through the Termination Date, (B) vesting of all outstandingstock options and other equity arrangements subject to vesting and held byExecutive through the Termination Date that had vested as of the TerminationDate, plus acceleration of the greater of (1) one-half of the options and otherequity arrangements that remain unvested as of the Termination Date or (2) anadditional twelve (12) months of vesting of such options and other equityarrangements, (C) base salary continuance, excluding any rights to a bonus andany payment rights other than base salary, for twelve (12) months after theTermination Date, and (D) to the extent required by COBRA only, continuation ofgroup health benefits pursuant to the Company's standard programs in effect atthe Termination Date, for a period of not less than 18 months (or such longerperiod as may be required by COBRA), provided that Executive makes the necessaryconversion and payments."

2.  Section 6.   Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in itsentirety and replaced with the following:

"6.	Term of Agreement.  This Agreement shall commence as ofthe date first set forth above and shall continue until the date (the"Termination Date") which is the earlier of (i) the date thatExecutive ceases to be an employee of the Company, for any reason, and (ii)December 31, 2007.  Any benefits accruing to Executive under Section 1 hereofprior to or upon the Termination Date shall survive termination of theAgreement, and any obligations of Executive under Sections 1, 4 and 5 hereofshall survive any such termination."

The remaining provisions of the Agreementremain in full force and effect.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed thisAgreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of theday and year first above written.

			

COMPANY

	

CORIO, INC.

			

By:     /s/ GEORGE KADIFA
George Kadifa

President and CEO
**				

EXECUTIVE**
	

	/s/ BRETT WHITE		

Brett White

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Signature Page to Change in Control AgreementAmendment]
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

222) IV-C-189 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:03 AM Sheet 222 of 232 
P.2 

^

£ 0 ST** 

* t PB01«-° 

4 

<? 

ATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

DEC 1 6 1991 

! r •• : 

4 -

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

;<f7--.v 

-OT 

ill ; 

Mr. Lester Sutherland 

Manufacturing Engineer 

315 Wexford Drive 

Huron, OH 44839 

Dear Mr. Sutherland: 

JAN ! R 1992 

-i 

This is in response to your letter of November 6, 1991 to 

Senator John Glenn. Senator Glenn requested that the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) address your comments 

regarding onboard refueling vapor recovery systems. We 

appreciate your interest in this rulemaking. 

EPA is proceeding with the rulemaking process for onboard 

controls as required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. 

As part of this process, Congress directed the EPA to consult 

with the Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding onboard 

system safety. This consultation is well underway. The 

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is 

part of the DOT, released a study of onboard system safety in 

July 1991. We are reviewing this study and have placed a copy 

in the public docket for this rulemaking. We also held a 

hearing on September 26th and 27th in order to solicit comments 

from the public on this issue. Written comments were accepted 

through October 27th. We are in the process of making the final 

determination on how to proceed with the rule based on DOT'S 

conclusions regarding safety risks of onboard systems and on the 

record developed during the comment period. 

Thank you again for your letter. It will be included in 

the public docket. Please feel free to contact me if you 

require any additional information. 

Sincerely yours, 

jy Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Public Docket A-87-11 

Senator John Glenn (Attn: Shannon Watson) 

Printed on Recycled Paper
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.

/s/ Mark A. Lopez
____________________________________
Mark A. Lopez
Chief Executive Officer
February 23, 2005



                              - 30 -
#### Laura SKINNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

*103No attorney on appeal for appellant.

■Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Kaufman • County. The penalty assessed is a fine of $250 and confinement in the county jail for a term of 30 days.

The record is before us'.without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

It is noted, however, that the court, in his judgment,, failed to include the jail sentence of 30 days as fixed, by the jury in its verdict. The judgment will therefore be reformed so as to assess the appellant’s punishment at, confinement in the county jail for 30 days and a fine of $250, so as to‘ conform to the verdict of the jury. As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NESTOR MENDOZA, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

ANNIE MARIE BAZAN,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-17-00117-CV

Appeal from the

County Court

of Hudspeth County, Texas 

(TC# CV-570)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, all costs both in this Court and the court below. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                 
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date             |  |  |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|                 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4436 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4436

          To extend the suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.62 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to tris (2-ethylhexyl) ester 
(Phosphoric acid)) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Ann Douglas Aase v. Buckley Madole, P.C.

Appellate case number: 01-18-00306-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-33659-A

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower 

 Acting for the Court

Panel consist of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss

Date: December 5, 2019
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  October 29, 2007 /s/ Dominick Pope Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpeechWorks
International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Stuart R. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  By: /s/ Stuart R. Patterson
                                  ---------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002          Stuart R. Patterson
                                  Chief Executive Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00392

- CR

DAMIEN TERRELL GARDI NER

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 09

- 07806

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 12, 2018
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL 

# W( 

# C y lJ FIRST CIRCUIT 2021 CA 0458 LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN THE MATTER OF MICHELLE BARNETT
DATE OFJUDGMENT. 

### APR 13 2022
ON APPEAL FROM THE LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS

NUMBER 2015-0662, PANEL B STATE OF LOUISIANA ETHICS ADJUDICATORY BOARD — PANEL B WILLIAM COOPER, III, GREGORY McDONALD,

AND ESTHER A. REDMANN

Kathleen M.Allen 

### Tracy M.Barker LaToya D. Jordan Baton Rouge, Louisiana David A. Lowe Baton Rouge, Louisiana Counsel for Appellee Louisiana Board ofEthics

Counsel for Appellant Michelle Barnett

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. Disposition: AFFIRMED.CHUTZ, J.

Respondent -

appellant, Michelle Barnett, appeals the order ofthe Louisiana 

### Ethics Adjudicatory Board ( EAB), 

### denying her motion for summary judgment, which sought dismissal ofthe charges levied against her bythe Louisiana Board of Ethics ( BOE) based on allegations of violations of the Louisiana Code of 

### Governmental Ethics. See La. R.S. 42: 1101 et seq. Because the EAB' s order is 

### clearly controlled by case law precedent and statutes; the issues involve no more than an application of well-settled rules to recurring fact situations; the EAB 

### opinion and conclusions of law adequately explain the order; and no error of law appears on the record, we affirm in accordance with La. Uniform Courts ofAppeal Rule 2- 16.2.A(2),( 4),( 5), & ( 6). 

### See La. C.C.P. art. 966. See also Louisiana Bd.of Ethics Matter ofVillere, 2015- 1939 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/22/16), 208 So. 3d 940, 949, writ denied, 2017-00128 (La. 3/ 13/ 17), 

### 216 So.3d 807 (the proper inquiry in a motion for summaryjudgment is whetherthe evidence in existence at the time of 

### the filing offormal charges, viewed in the aggregate, establishes thatthe BOE fully investigated the allegations and uncovered a factual basis sufficient to substantiate 

### a probable violation ofthe Code ofGovernmental Ethics, notwithstanding that the presumption may later be proven to be untrue). Accordingly, the EAB' s order, 

### denying respondent' s motion for summaryjudgment, is affirmed. Appeal costs are assessed against respondent - appellant, Michelle Barnett. AFFIRMED.

2
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|No chart available.                                              
|No chart available.                                              
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Oklahoma Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Salomon Sredni, Chief
Executive Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 3, 2007 |  | /s/ Salomon Sredni     
|Date           |  | Salomon Sredni         
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17,2008 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-llHtJtll{}-~ With whom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Boeing Bhupinder Singh 1211612009 

### ATA Joe White 1211612009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master Ust to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
ex_139490.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 





 


March 29, 2019


 


NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,


 


Triton Funds was founded by three undergraduate students from the University of California, San Diego and California State University, Northridge. Our journey started with a simple conversation amongst ourselves about possible careers available to us in the finance field. We concluded that our schools were not target universities for the private equity and venture capitalist industry. As a result, we have embarked on a mission to provide opportunities to our fellow peers and campuses in this highly competitive space of PE/VC. We reached out to local investors to help us fund our initiative and create Triton Funds: providing real-world experience for students to invest real dollars into real companies. The response we received from local San Diego and Northridge investors and mentors has been amazing. However, we would like to grow this opportunity beyond the boundaries of our respective campuses, and someday offer the Triton experience to other undergraduates across the nation who like us, never would have the opportunity to work in the PE/VC space. In order to complete this vision, we have decided to call on publicly traded companies who support our student initiative to help us grow our operations, by donating shares to our effort. All of our share donations are used to enhance the student learning curve whether to purchase materials, help pay for overhead, or even contribute to scholarship opportunities.


 


This letter is subject to the parties entering this Share Donation Agreement:


 


	
			Between

				
			NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Symbol: NBY, the “Donor”)

			
	 	 
	
			And

				
			TRITON FUNDS LLC (the “Recipient”)

			
	 	 
	
			Securities

				
			Common Stock w/ registration rights

			
	 	 
	
			Number of Shares

				
			150,000

			
	 	 
	
			Donation Date

				
			March 29, 2019

			



 


	 	Donor:	/s/ Justin Hall	 
	 	Justin Hall, Esq.	 
	 	NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 



 


	 	Recipient:	/s/ Yash Thukral	 
	 	TRITON FUNDS LLC	 
	 	Yash Thukral	 
	 	Authorized Signatory	 



 


 


 


1262 Prospect Street, La Jolla, California 92037


858.768.0001 – tritonfunds@tritonfunds.com – www.tritonfunds.com