alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA


Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Service Contract Inventory Report & FY 2023 
Planned Analysis

AGENCY: United States Agency for Global Media.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) announces 
the members of its FY 2022 Service Contract Inventory Report and FY 
2023 Planned Analysis.

ADDRESSES: USAGM Office of Contracts, 330 Independence Ave. SW, 
Washington, DC 20237.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Khilena Adhin, Acquisition Policy 
Branch Chief, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#395a5657495655505a40794c4a585e54175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfdcd0d1cfd0d3d6dcc6ffcaccded8d291d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-920-2302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 743 of division C 
of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, the U.S. Agency for 
Global Media (USAGM) is publishing this notice to advise the public of 
the availability of its FY 2022 Service Contract Inventory Report and 
FY 2023 Planned Analysis. They are available on the USAGM website, 
through the following link: https://www.usagm.gov/our-work/strategy-and-results/strategic-priorities/research-reports/service-contract-inventory/. The service contract inventory provides information on 
service contract actions over $25,000 made in FY 2022. The information 
is organized by function to show how contracted resources are 
distributed throughout the Agency. The inventory has been developed in 
accordance with guidance on service contract inventories issued on 
November 5, 2010 and on December 19, 2011 by the Office of Management 
and Budget, Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP).

    Dated: February 28, 2024.
Armanda Matthews,
Program Support Specialist, U.S. Agency for Global Media.
[FR Doc. 2024-04475 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 ... S ee Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DI STRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 37 2- CV I N R E L I ONE L D. M UR P HY , J R . R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of th e o pi ni on t hat r el i ef s houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or
w r i t of m and am us i s den i ed. P E R CU R I AM
PA N EL: DA U PH I N O T, LI V I N G STO N , an d M C C O Y, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r 9, 2008
A district court has limited discretion to deviate from the NRS 

125B.070 child support formula, and any deviation must be based on the 

factors in NRS 125B.080(9). Love v. Love, 114 Nev. 572, 579, 959 P.2d 

523, 528 (1998). Each parent has a "duty to provide the child necessary 

maintenance, health care, education and support," NRS 125B.020(1), and 

it is presumed that the needs of the child are met by the NRS 125B.070 

child support formula, NRS 125B.080(5). This court reviews district court 

child support awards for an abuse of discretion. Wallace v. Wallace, 112 

Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996). 

Having reviewed the parties' arguments and the appendix to 

appellant's fast track statement, we are not persuaded that the district 

court abused its discretion when it did not impose an upward deviation 

from the child support formula and denied appellant's request that 

respondent pay for a share of the extracurricular, activities requested by 

appellant. Fernandez v. Fernandez, 126 Nev. 28, 40, 222 P.3d 1031, 1039 

(2010) (explaining that "[t]he child's best interest, in the support setting, is 

tied to the goal of the support statutes generally, which is to provide fair 

support, as defined in [the statutory formula] and [NRS] 125B.080"); 

Wallace, 112 Nev. at 1019, 922 P.2d at 543. As to appellant's argument 

that the district court failed to make findings regarding an upward 

deviation analysis, because the district court did not grant the deviation, it 

did not need to make specific findings of fact regarding the NRS 

125B.080(9) factors. See NRS 125B.080(6) (providing that "[i]f the amount 

of the awarded support. . . is greater or less than the amount which would 

be established under the applicable formula" the court shall set forth 

findings for the basis of the deviation); Anastassatos v. Anastassatos, 112 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A cep 
Nev. 317, 320, 913 P.2d 652, 654 (1996) (stating that the justification for 

any non-conformity with the statutory formula must be specified in 

written findings of fact). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Parraguirre 

/ea J. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge 

Pecos Law Group 

Steinberg Law Group 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A e
Exhibit 4.370

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169453 dated January 19, 2019

 

To render

 

intra zonal communications services

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

January 19, 2024

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 735-рчс dated October 18, 2018

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head

 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov

 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
I, Scott J. Sloane, Environmental Program Specialist III for the Department of Environmental

Conservation, being duly sworn, state the following:

The Department of Environmental Conservation did not receive any factual or other substantive

information that was submitted in writing as public comment and that was relevant to the

accuracy, coverage, or other aspect of the Department of Environmental Conservation

regulations amending 1 8 AAC 50.030 and adopting by reference the revised Anchorage Carbon

Monoxide Maintenance Plan contained within the State Air Quality Control Plan.

Date: /2

1Juneu, Alaska

—‘“ Scott J. ioafi, EPS III

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this

day of9L4j... , 2-61

[NOTARY SEAL] Notary Pulflic in and for the

State of Alaska

My commission expires: (A21+k ftci&.

STATE OF ALASKA

OFFICIAL SEAL

Cassidy Y. Kearney

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expiros With Office.

a
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C. 63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  August 19, 2005


/s/ Edward Alexander
Edward Alexander
Chief Accounting Officer of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Proton
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Proton Laboratories, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Filed 6/19/13 P. v. Winbush CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
CHARLES C. WINBUSH,
Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B243657 (Super. Ct. No. MA053800-01) (Los Angeles County)

Charles C. Winbush appeals from a judgment entered after an order revoking probation. We affirm. Winbush was convicted of second degr ee commercial burglary upon his no contest plea. (Pen. Code, § 459.) The trial c ourt sentenced him to the upper term of three years, but suspended execution of the sentence and granted probation. Winbush violated
the terms and conditions of hi s probation. He tested positiv e for hydrocodone for which he did not provide a prescription, and he te sted positive for mar ijuana. He did not complete court-ordered community service and did not enroll in required drug and domestic violence programs. The court revoked his probation. We appointed counsel to represent Winb ush in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.2 On December 17, 2012, we advised Wi nbush that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or i ssues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Winbush’s attorney has fully comp lied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal. 3d 436, 441.)
The order is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.3 Christopher G. Estes, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles

________________ ______________

Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of XO Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) we, Carl J. Grivner, Chief Executive Officer, and Gregory W.Freiburg, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify that, to thebest of our knowledge,:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.Date: November 9, 2007       /s/ Carl J. Grivner  Carl J. Grivner  Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11706 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. LORETO RAMOS-PABLO,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15 -CR- 134 -1

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Loreto Ramos

- Pablo pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal from the United States and was sentenced to 41 months in prison, to be followed by

a t wo- year term of supervised release. R amos- Pablo argues on appeal that his indictment failed to invoke the sentencing enhancement in 8 U.S.C

. § 1326(b)(2) , as his indictment failed to allege the existence of a prior

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 3, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11706 Document: 00514102018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2017No. 16

- 11706

2 conviction . He contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for a conviction under § 1326(a) and violates his due process rights. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, asserting that Ramos- Pablo’s argument is foreclosed by
Almendarez- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). As R amos
- Pablo concedes that his argument is foreclosed and is raised only to preserve it for further review, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp.,
Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969) . Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. Case: 16-11706 Document: 00514102018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2017
H. R. 2149 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4354 Pahoa 

Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CECIL L. HEFTEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1975 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1975

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, as the ``First 
           Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2011

 Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Speier, Ms. Richardson, 
 Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Honda, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Costa, Mr. Hunter, 
 Mr. Filner, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Stark, Mr. McNerney, 
Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Sherman, Mr. McClintock, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Calvert, Mr. 
    Garamendi, Mr. Farr, Mrs. Capps, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
  California, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Berman, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Roybal-Allard, 
   Mrs. Bono Mack, Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of 
 California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Chu, Mr. Bilbray, and Mr. 
    Nunes) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, as the ``First 
           Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT OLIVER GOODALL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### TALBOTT v. STATE.

No. 26589.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal' for appellant.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dish Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State’s ■ Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Charged with driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, appellant waived jury trial and entered his plea of guilty before the court. He was adjudged guilty and assessed a penalty of 60 days in jail.

The proceedings appear to be regular. The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception and nothing is ■ presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 5,963  | 6,456  | 6,799  | 7,771  | 7,684  | 6,905  | 6,928  | 6,464  | 6,184 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,894  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp. |

| By:    | */s/*   *Donny                Smith*Donny                SmithChief Executive                OfficerChief Financial                Officer |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:    May                  15, 2007 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Motor Sport Country Club Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Claus Wagner, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







August 18, 2011
By:
/s/ Claus WagnerClaus WagnerChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21
 
 ITC HOLDINGS CORP. CORPORATE ORGANIZATION CHART
ITC HOLDINGS CORP.
METC GP Holdings, Inc. International Transmission            ITC Equipment, LLC            ITC Midwest LLC            ITC Grid Development, LLC            ITC Green            New York
Company            Power Express            Transmission
d/b/a ITCTransmission            LLC            Holdings Corp. **
Green Power            Conjunction LLC
Express LLC **
*
METC GP Holdings II, LLC            METC LP            METC LP            METC LP            METC LP            METC LP
Holdings 1, Inc. * Holdings II, Holdings III, Holdings IV, Holdings V,
Inc.* Inc. * Inc.* Inc. *
Empire
Conjunction LLC
**
Michigan            Green Powei
Transco            Express LP *
Holdings, L.P.
ITC Panhandle Transmission, LLC            ITC Great Plains, LLC
Michigan
Electric
Transmission
Company, LLC
All entities are organized in
the State of Michigan, except: *
Entities organized in the State of
Delaware ** Entities organized in the
State of New York