alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR00-11-000]


EOTT Energy Operating Limited Partnership, Complainant v. Conoco 
Pipe Line Company, Respondent; Notice of Filing

September 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 14, 2000, EOTT Energy Operating 
Limited Partnership (EOTT), tendered for filing a complaint, pursuant 
to Rule 385.206 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure and 
Section 13 of the Interstate Commerce Act, against Conoco Pipe Line 
Company (CPL) requesting that the Commission order CPL to publish a 
fair and non-discriminatory proration policy in its FERC tariffs number 
117 and 306. Because CPL's continuing course of action is adversely 
affecting EOTT's ability to use CPL's common carrier services, EOTT 
requests fast track processing of its complaint by the Commission 
pursuant to Section 385.206(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure.
    Copies of the filing were served via facsimile and courier to CPL. 
Questions concerning this Complaint may be directed to Complainant's 
General Counsel, P.O. Box 4666, Houston, Texas 77210-4666, Phone (713) 
993-5671, Fax (713) 402-2875.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before September 25, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or 
before September 25, 2000.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24395 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ANGEL et al. v. ROWLETTE.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 22, 1954.

Guy K. Duerson, Jr., Berea, Eugene S. Siler, Williamsburg, for appellants.

George Ross, Richmond, for appellee.

*69PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment dismissing appellants’ petition which sought to have adjudged and located a passway through the land of appellee. Since it appears that appellee’s land has been adversely possessed against the world, which would include appellants, for over 40 years, whatever rights appellants may have had to an unlocated and unused passway have long since been extinguished.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 4.346

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 167990 dated September 08, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 08, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 03, 2018 No. 638-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
#### COMMONWEALTH v. SIRLES.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1953.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 16, 1954.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Jo. M. Ferguson, Asst. Atty., Gen., for appellant.

Earl Osborne, Benton, for appellee.

.MILLIKEN, Justice.

Rex Sirles changed his plea to guilty on' two indictments for dwelling house breaking, and received a two-year sentence on each indictment which he was assured would run concurrently. ■ He was considered eligible for parole until our recent decision in Wooden v. Goheen, Ky., 255 S.W.2d 1000, in which we held that under Section 288 of the Criminal Code of Practice separate judgments of conviction must be served consecutively. The trial court granted him a writ of coram nobis and set aside his sentence of conviction Upon the ground that Sirles’ change of his plea from not guilty *to*guilty was induced by the unintentional misrepresentation by the Commonwealth that the sentences would run concurrently and not consecutively which — so far as layman Sirles was concerned — was a vital mistake of fact, hence reachable by coram nobis. The Commonwealth appealed.

We do not concur in this reasoning of the trial court, but appreciate the sense of fair play which prompted it. Proceedings on coram nobis are essentially a civil action, summary in nature. Elliott v. Commonwealth, 292 Ky. 614, 620, 167 S.W.2d 703; State of Indiana ex. rel. Emmert v. Gentry, 223 Ind. 535, 62 N.E.2d 860, 161 A.L.R. 532. The right to the.writ is based on a mistake of fact. Walsh v. Tuggle, 303 Ky. 200, 197 S.W.2d 253 ; 49 C.J.S., Judgments, § 313; 31 Am.Jur. 325, Judgments, Section 806; for a review of coram nobis in Kentucky, see 39 Ky. L.J. 440 to 447. The error in the case at bar, if it be construed as a mistake of fact, is a mistake which does not bear on the question of guilt or innocence, and hence the enforcement of the judgment sentencing Sirles would not be a denial of justice. Clark v. Commonwealth, Ky., 259 S.W. 2d 446. However, our denial of the writ on technical grounds does not close the door to an appeal for executive clemency in case there has been any unintentional breach of faith upon the part of the Commonwealth as alleged in Sirles’ petition.

The judgment is reversed.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ruth Swan, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 30, 2007



/s/  Ruth Swan

Ruth Swan,

Chief Financial Officer













#
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.  Date: January 9, 2008/s/ Mark A. Lopez
Mark A. Lopez
Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 95    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 85     | 97     | 193    | 182    | 284    | 172    | 383    | 172    | 216    | 223   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 77     | 509    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 186 (Monday, September 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57596-57597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-513-001]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 19, 2000.
    Take notice that on September 8, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised

[[Page 57597]]

Volume No. 1, Substitute Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 10, to be 
effective October 1, 2000.
    CIG states that on August 31, 2000, CIG made its annual filing 
adjusting its Gas Quality Control Surcharge(s). It has come to CIG's 
attention that the tariff sheets included herein contained a 
typographical error. Therefore, CIG is herein submitting substitute 
tariff sheets which correct such error.
    CIG further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
CIG's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 Firrst Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-24518 Filed 9-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Carl J. Grivner, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of XO Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2007 /s/ Carl J. Grivner   Carl J. Grivner   Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 08

- 00358

- CV

ST. JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER,

PATRICIA SISTRUNK, R .N.

, AND

AMANDA GLOVER, R.N.

, Appellant s

v.

GRANT TAYLOR, M.D.

, AND MELISSA POWELL, M.D.,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND

NEXT FRIENDS OF E.A.T., A CHILD

, Appellee s

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08

- 000611

- CV

- 272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted,

and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2 ).

PER CURIAMSt. Joseph Regional Health Center v. Taylor Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna , and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 22 , 2009

[CV06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, September 28, 2000, 2 p.m.

# LOCATION: 

Room 410, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS: 

Closed to the Public.

# Matter to be considered:

Compliance Status Report

The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-0709.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 

Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207, (301) 504-0800.

Dated: September 19, 2000.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24471 Filed 9-19-00; 3:54 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2149 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2149

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CECIL L. HEFTEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cecil L. 
Heftel Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
MARC POPE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5845

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Regional Conflict Counsel, and Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant 

Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
      Abdoulline, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
        Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.





By:/S/
                Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                AbdoullinePresident,
                CEODate:
                 May 20, 2008