alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CA-067-1990; CA-40204] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice corrections. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 29, 2000, regarding the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed expansion of the existing Mesquite Gold Mine in Imperial County, Ca. The notice contains information that has changed.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kevin Marty, Bureau of Land Management, 1661 South 4th Street, El Centro, CA; telephone (760) 337-4422. 

## Corrections

                        (a) In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 29, 2000, in DOCID fr29au00-85, on page 52436, under the                         **DATES**                         caption, change the comment period ending date to November 7, 2000.                     

                        (b) On the same page as above, under the                         **ADDRESSES**                         caption, change the extension for the Imperial County Planning and Building Department to 4313.                     

                        (c) On the same page as above, under the                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         caption, change the Imperial County Planning and Building Department contact name to Richard Cabanilla, and change the telephone extension to 4313.                     

Dated: September 15, 2000. 

Greg Thomsen, 

Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-24371 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 21

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Garrett (for himself, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Simpson, Mrs. Blackburn, 
Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Jones, Mr. Broun of 
   Georgia, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. McKinley, Ms. Hayworth, Mr. Miller of 
  Florida, Mr. Posey, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Gingrey of 
Georgia, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Burton of 
Indiana, Mr. Conaway, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Gary 
    G. Miller of California, Mr. Petri, Mr. Dent, Mr. Burgess, Mr. 
McCotter, Mr. Terry, Mr. Franks of Arizona, and Mr. Lamborn) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reclaiming Individual Liberty Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    Section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Termination.--This section shall not apply with respect to 
any month beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education

AGENCY: Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA).

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that a 
meeting of the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education (ACDE) is 
scheduled to be held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday, October 7, 
2000. The meeting will be open to the public and will be held in the 
Constellation Room at U.S. Navy Europe's headquarters on North Audley 
Street in London, England. The meeting will be preceded by visits by 
ACDE members and DoDEA representatives to DoD overseas schools in 
Iceland, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Netherlands from October 2-4. 
The purpose of the Council is to recommend to the Director, Department 
of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS), general policies for the 
operation of the DoDDS; to provide the Director with information about 
effective educational programs and practices that should be considered 
by DoDDS; and to perform other tasks as may be required by the 
Secretary of Defense. The focus of this meeting will be on student 
achievement and progress towards organizational strategic goals. For 
further information contact Ms. Polly Purser, at 703-696-4235, 
extension 1911.

    Dated: September 18, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-24330 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofAvistar Communications Corporation.

 
|        |   | By:    |   | /s/ GERALD J. BURNETT   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Name:  |   | Gerald J. Burnett       |   |   |
|   |   | Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

I, Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofAvistar Communications Corporation.

 
|        | By:    | /s/ ROBERT J.  HABIG    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Robert J. Habig         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. OR00-11-000]

Take notice that on September 14, 2000, EOTT Energy Operating Limited Partnership (EOTT), tendered for filing a complaint, pursuant to Rule 385.206 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure and Section 13 of the Interstate Commerce Act, against Conoco Pipe Line Company (CPL) requesting that the Commission order CPL to publish a fair and non-discriminatory proration policy in its FERC tariffs number 117 and 306. Because CPL's continuing course of action is adversely affecting EOTT's ability to use CPL's common carrier services, EOTT requests fast track processing of its complaint by the Commission pursuant to Section 385.206(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Copies of the filing were served via facsimile and courier to CPL. Questions concerning this Complaint may be directed to Complainant's General Counsel, P.O. Box 4666, Houston, Texas 77210-4666, Phone (713) 993-5671, Fax (713) 402-2875.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR  385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before September 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before September 25, 2000.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24395  Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

PERRY COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cr-00047-RBS-TEM1) 

Submitted: March 19, 2021 Decided: September 10, 2021

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Perry Cousins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Perry Cousins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking 

reconsideration of its prior order granting in part and denying in part his motion for 

reduction of sentence under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 

132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we grant Cousins’ motions to amend or correct informal brief and to amend 

and clarify the record pertaining to the informal brief, treat those motions as supplemental 

informal briefs, deny Cousins’ motion to appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Cousins, No. 4:10-cr-00047-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. 

July 10, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David A.
Gestetner, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Chairman of the
Board of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 13, 2009By:
                /s/ David A. GestetnerName:
                David A. GestetnerTitle:
                President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Secretary,and
      Chairman of the Board(Principal
      Executive, Financial,and
      Accounting
Officer)
#### LUKE v. STATE.

No. 26907.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1954.

Martin & Shown, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for aggravated assault; the punishment, one year in jail.

The injured party was the former wife of the appellant. He had obtained a divorce from her in 1951. At the time of the alleged offense, they were common law husband and wife. The injured party testified that on the date alleged appellant came into her bedroom and, while she lay asleep, struck and beat her with a pistol. As a result of the injuries inflicted, she was hospitalized for two weeks.

Notwithstanding appellant’s strong defense of alibi, the testimony of the injured party supported the jury’s verdict.

About two years prior to the alleged attack, the injured party had been convicted in federal court of possessing marijuana, a narcotic, and served a sentence in federal prison.

Testifying as a witness in his own behalf, appellant denied that he assaulted the prosecutrix and that, at that time, he was at a different place.

Upon cross-examination, appellant was interrogated by the state relative to his wife’s conviction for the possession of marijuana. He was then asked, “Do you remember in 1951 sending her out to buy marijuana cigarettes for you?” To that *154question appellant objected, and his objection was sustained. Appellant insists that the form of the question carried with it not only the implication but assumed that he did, in fact, send his wife .to buy marijuana cigarettes for him, thereby violating the Narcotics Act, art: 725b, Vernon’s P.C., a felony.

Whéther the asking'of'the question was or was not error need not be determined, for we have reached the conclusion that the prompt action of the trial court in sustaining the objection thereto relieved .the matter of reversible error.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Kadifa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Corio, Inc.

|Date: May 14, 2004 | /s/    George
Kadifa
|------------------ | --------------------
|                   |                     

---
EXHIBIT 23.1


                                       KLT
                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA, LLC
                          PERSONAL FINANCIAL PLANNING,
                        BUSINESS SERVICES & TAX PLANNING



March 9, 2007


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Kyle L. Tingle,  CPA,  LLC  consents to the  inclusion of his report
dated February 20, 2007 accompanying the audited financial statements of Madison
Explorations,  Inc. as of December  31,  2006,  in the Filing  Statement on Form
10-KSB, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange  Commission,  and to our reference
to the Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Prospectus.


Very truly yours,



/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
____________________________
    Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30401

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEITH RUSSART

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:04-CR-80-2

Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Keith Russart appeals his 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty

plea conviction for use of a communication facility in committing and facilitating

the commission of a felony. Russart argues that the district court abused its

discretion in departing upward from the sentencing guidelines range based on

U.S.S.G § 5K2.1 and unreasonably deviated upward from the sentencing

guidelines range in imposing a non-guideline sentence.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-30401

2

In light of Russart’s reckless conduct resulting in the death of an

individual and the fact that the applicable Guideline did not take the possibility

of a death into account, the district court did not abuse its discretion in

departing upward based on § 5K2.1. In departing up to the statutory maximum,

the district court also properly gave consideration to factors that met the

objectives of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including Russart’s need for educational and

vocational training and alcohol and drug rehabilitation programs, his lack of

serious criminal history, and his recent drug use. United States v. ZunigaPeralta, 442 F.3d 345, 347 (5th Cir. 2006 ), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2954 (2006).

Assuming thatthe district court could also make a non-guidelines upward

deviation at sentencing, the district court properly considered the relevant

§ 3553(a) factors, as stated above, and did not give significant weight to

irrelevant factors. The sentence imposed did not reflect a clear error in

judgment or an abuse of discretion by the district court and was reasonable

under the circumstance of the case. The sentence is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6696

DEON ARNELL TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JOHN DOE DETAINEES/INMATES; JANE DOE DETAINEES/INMATES,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TERRY KOKOLIS, Director of Talbot County Department of Corrections and 

Detention Center; KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; 

FOOD SERVICE PROVIDER (TRINITY); COMMISSARY SERVICE 

PROVIDER (KEEFE); HEALTHCARE SERVICE PROVIDER (WELLPATH); 

TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDER (SECURUS); JOHN DOE 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, (all) individually and in their official capacities; 

JANE DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, (all) individually and in their official 

capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00555-JRR)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6696 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deon Arnell Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6696 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Deon Arnell Turner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Turner v. Kokolis, 

No. 1:23-cv-00555-JRR (D. Md. June 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6696 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 3 of 3