alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Energy & Manufacturing USA Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald DeCiccio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: August 16, 2010By: /s/ GERALD DECICCIOGerald DeCiccioChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00333-CV

IN RE Cleo BUSTAMANTE, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice, dissenting

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On September 2, 2016, a majority of the en banc court, sua sponte granted en banc 

consideration of this original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.2. Accordingly, this 

mandamus proceeding will be submitted to the entire court for consideration. 

It is so ORDERED on September 12, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-05-27517, styled Roberto Fernandez and Maria Imelda Flores v. 

Abaco Consultants, Inc., et al, pending in the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable 

Amado J. Abascal, III presiding.
FAA Exemption Rulemaking

Section 333 

Of The FAA Reform Act and Part 11 

Prepared by 

James C Suss

Licensed REALTOR in the State of Georgia 

with Harry Norman, Realtors

and owner of The Edit Haus LLC

December 06, 2015 

1727 Brandon Lee Way SW

Marietta, Georgia, 30008

678-357-7683

jim.suss@harrynorman.com
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 193 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 193

                    For the relief of Zdenko Lisak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Zdenko Lisak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, 
              ZDENKO LISAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 212(a) and 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Zdenko Lisak may not be removed from 
the United States, or denied admission to the United States, by reason 
of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial of admission 
and is reflected in the records of the Immigration and Naturalization 
Service of the Department of Justice, or the Visa Office of the 
Department of State, on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Rescission of Outstanding Order of Removal.--The Attorney 
General shall rescind any outstanding order of removal or deportation, 
or any finding of deportability, that has been entered against Zdenko 
Lisak by reason of any act described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
International Cellular Accessories (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifford Chapman, Chief Executive and
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










Name:
            Clifford
      ChapmanTitle:
            Chief Executive and
      Financial OfficerDate:
            February 24,
      2010
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2202 

To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2011 

Mr. TIERNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Essex National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Essex National Herit5 age Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE 

7 AREA. 

8 Division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 

9 Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public 

10 Law 104–333) is amended— 

11 (1) in section 507, by striking ‘‘September 30, 

12 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2027’’; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2202 IH

1 (2) in section 508(a), by striking 

2 ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4444 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4444

  To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on frames and mountings for 
      spectacles, goggles, or the like, the foregoing of plastics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Chabot (for himself and Mrs. Schmidt) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on frames and mountings for 
      spectacles, goggles, or the like, the foregoing of plastics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRAMES AND MOUNTINGS FOR SPECTACLES, GOGGLES, OR THE LIKE, 
              THE FOREGOING OF PLASTICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Frames and          2.4%            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          mountings for                                                     12/31/2015
                          spectacles,
                          goggles, or the
                          like, the
                          foregoing of
                          plastics
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9003.11.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 185 (Friday, September 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 57369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-24371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-067-1990; CA-40204]


Correction to Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental 
Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement on the Proposed Expansion 
of the Existing Mesquite Gold Mine

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published a notice in the 
Federal Register on August 29, 2000, regarding the availability of the 
Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement on the 
proposed expansion of the existing Mesquite Gold Mine in Imperial 
County, Ca. The notice contains information that has changed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Marty, Bureau of Land 
Management, 1661 South 4th Street, El Centro, CA; telephone (760) 337-
4422.

Corrections

    (a) In the Federal Register of August 29, 2000, in DOCID fr29au00-
85, on page 52436, under the DATES caption, change the comment period 
ending date to November 7, 2000.
    (b) On the same page as above, under the ADDRESSES caption, change 
the extension for the Imperial County Planning and Building Department 
to 4313.
    (c) On the same page as above, under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT caption, change the Imperial County Planning and Building 
Department contact name to Richard Cabanilla, and change the telephone 
extension to 4313.

    Dated: September 15, 2000.
Greg Thomsen,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-24371 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

|                | For        | Against   | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote |
|---------------------|------------|-----------|---------|-----------------|
| Mary Baglivo        | 62,871,693 | 577,901   | 21,142  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Brent Callinicos    | 63,307,577 | 134,447   | 28,712  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Emanuel Chirico     | 60,968,677 | 2,316,693 | 185,366 | 2,668,990       |   |
| Juan R. Figuereo    | 63,259,109 | 189,185   | 22,442  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Joseph B. Fuller    | 61,047,076 | 2,390,583 | 33,077  | 2,668,990       |   |
| V. James Marino     | 62,700,608 | 736,403   | 33,725  | 2,668,990       |   |
| G. Penny McIntyre   | 63,360,394 | 89,071    | 21,271  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Amy McPherson       | 63,361,324 | 90,390    | 19,022  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Henry Nasella       | 60,943,851 | 2,493,478 | 33,407  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Edward R. Rosenfeld | 63,354,743 | 92,069    | 23,924  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Craig Rydin         | 62,466,072 | 981,582   | 23,082  | 2,668,990       |   |
| Amanda Sourry       | 63,253,176 | 196,226   | 21,334  | 2,668,990       |   |

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   | By:   /s/ Mark D. Fischer       |
|   | Mark D. Fischer, Executive Vice President |
|   |                                      |
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00397-CV

HAVEN CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM MICHAEL LEEBRON II, E.J. KING AND BRAZORIA 

COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 62845A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed March 30, 2015. No clerk’s record 

has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal 

informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On May 27, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On May 15, 2015, appellees filed a motion to dismiss for want of 

jurisdiction in which they argue the judgment is not final because it does not 

dispose of all parties and all claims. Because appellant has failed to file a clerk’s 

record in this appeal, we cannot determine whether the judgment is final. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205–06 (Tex. 2001) (“To determine 

whether an order disposes of all pending claims and parties, it may of course be 

necessary for the appellate court to look to the record in the case”).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is 

denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, John R. Folkerth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shopsmith, Inc. (the “registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: February 8, 2005      By: /s/ John R. Folkerth    John R. Folkerth    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Page 17
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jose Angel Landaverde v. Joe D. Gutierrez

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00732

- CV

Trial court case number: 1139863

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1 of Harris County

Jose Angel Landaverde appeal s from the trial court’s judgment signed September 24, 2019, granting appellee, Joe D. Gutierrez, possession of premises in which Landaverde has been residing

. In the judgment, the trial court set the amount of the bond to supersede execution of the judgment at $5,550.

On October 2, 2019, Landaverde filed a motion in this Court requesting a stay of issuance of the writ of possession and for review of the “excessive Supersedeas bond.” The clerk’s record
indic ates that Landaverde has filed statements of inability in the trial court and no order has issued overruling his claim of inability to afford payment of court costs. \

Rule 24.2(b) requires a trial court to lower the amount of security to an amount that wi ll not cause substantial economic harm to the judgment debtor if the court finds, after notice and a hearing, that posting a bond in the amount required by Rule 24.2(a) is likely to cause the judgment
debtor substantial economic harm. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.2( a), (b). T he clerk’s record does not indicate
that Landaverde has asked the trial court to reduce the amount of the supersedeas bond based on his ability to pay and the substantial economic hard the bond will cause. See Law Eng’g & Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. S losburg Co. , 100 S.W.3d 389, (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, mem. order) (appellate court may not review trial court’s exercise of discretion in setting amount of security unless record shows appellant requested trial court first determine sufficiency of bond and trial court made ruling); Brady v. Compass Bank , No. 04

- 19

- 00021

- CV, 2019 WL 1459257, at *2 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Apr. 3, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (appellant does not preserve claim that supersedeas is excessive if he does not request reduct ion of the supersedeas amount based on contention that amount will cause substantial economic harm); Johnson v. Villatoro , No. 14

- 18

- 00150

- CV, 2018 WL 3848070, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 14, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (appellate court cannot review county court’s exercise of discretion unless record shows appellant made request to reduce amount of security due to substantial economic harm was presented to trial court and ruling made on request).Because Landaverde has not requested reduction of the amount of the supersedeas due to

substantial economic harm, we deny his motion to stay the writ of possession and to review the trial court’s supersedeas amount . Landaverde may renew his request for review of the supersedeas bond if he preserves thi s complaint by seeking reduction in the trial court due to substantial
economic harm.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____ Justice Richard Hightower

________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

___ October 10, 2019

____
**Exhibit 21**

Subsidiaries of the registrant are asfollows:
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **State  or Other**   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------|
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of**  |
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Incorporation  or** |
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Organization**      |
|                                                   |       |                  |
| Boise Cascade, L.L.C.                                  |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Cascade Finance Corporation                      |       | Delaware              |
| Birch Creek Investments, L.L.C.                        |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Cascade Aviation, L.L.C.                         |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing,  L.L.C.        |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing  Holdings Corp. |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Cascade Corporation Chile, S.A.                  |       | Chile                 |
| Compania Industrial Puerto Montt, S.A.                 |       | Chile                 |
| BC Chile Investment Corporation                        |       | Delaware              |
| BC Brazil Investment Corporation                       |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Cascade do Brasil LTDA.                          |       | Brazil                |
| Boise AllJoist Ltd.                                    |       | Canada                |
| Boise Building Products Limited                        |       | United Kingdom        |
| Boise Engineered Wood Products Limited                 |       | United Kingdom        |
| Boise Building Solutions Distribution,  L.L.C.         |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C.                |       | Delaware              |
| Boise White Paper, L.L.C.                              |       | Delaware              |
| Boise White Paper Sales Corp.                          |       | Delaware              |
| Boise White Paper Holdings Corp.                       |       | Delaware              |
| International Falls Power Company                      |       | Delaware              |
| Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway  Company       |       | Minnesota             |
| Bemis Corporation                                      |       | Delaware              |
| BC China Corporation                                   |       | Delaware              |
| Boise Hong Kong Limited                                |       | Hong Kong             |
| Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings  Corp.           |       | Delaware              |
| B.C.T. Inc.                                            |       | Delaware              |

 

----