alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lucinda HICKS, Appellant, v. W. T. BAILEY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 15, 1954.

Joe Hobson, Prestonsburg, Dan T. Martin, Hindman, for appellant.

Clark Pratt, Hindman, for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

This suit was brought by appellant to quiet her title to a one-half undivided interest in the minerals underlying a tract of land. The basis of appellant’s claim is a sheriff’s deed executed in 1935 pursuant to an execution on a judgment against appel-lee. It is appellee’s contention that this deed was and is void, and the Chancellor so adjudged.

While many questions are argued by the parties, the principal question seems to be whether or not a valid levy was made on this property by the sheriff. The record shows an execution was issued by the clerk of the Knott Circuit Court on January 5, 1934, returnable on March 15, 1934. The return on this execution is as follows:

> “Executed by levying on property of W. T. Bailey, same being sold and execution collected in full.

> “This Aug. 27, 1934.”

This return is unique at least in two respects. The apparent return date is more than five months after the execution was returnable. The return does not show a levy upon anything identifiable.

If the sheriff’s sale was valid, it must have been made pursuant to a valid levy. The sheriff had no power to make the levy after the return date on the execution, and this would make the sale void. Deskins v. Coleman, 286 Ky. 624, 151 S.W.2d 751.

Assuming, however, that the execution was still effective at the time the sheriff attempted to make the levy, it is obvious that because of the lack of any sort of description there was no levy on any particular property of the execution defendant. In ascertaining what passes under a sheriff’s deed, we must look to the description of the property appearing in the return on *33the execution. Taylor & Crate v. Asher, 223 Ky. 574, 4 S.W.2d 385. Since no property was levied upon, it follows that the sheriff was without authority to either sell or convey this particular tract.

It is true that the deed itself contains recitations pertaining to the issuance of the execution, the levy, advertisement and sale. However, these recitations do not appear in a court record and are mere conclusions insufficient to establish that the real estate in controversy was actually levied upon by the sheriff in any one of the three modes required. See Anderson v. Kerr, 1951, Ky., 240 S.W.2d 91.

Appellant raises other questions which it appears unnecessary to discuss. It appearing that no valid levy was ever made on this property, the sheriff was without authority to sell it and the deed, was void. The Chancellor properly adjudicated the rights of the parties.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### CLINTON v. STATE.

No. 26625.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1953.

Hardeman, Allen & Bamford, Thomas K. Bamford, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., C. S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*106BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of burglary, and his punishment was assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts on the main trial nor on the motion for a new trial.

By motion, appellant sought to have the verdict set aside and a new trial awarded because of claimed irregularities in the return of the verdict.

It is clearly shown that the verdict returned by the jury and received by the court was one of guilt with punishment assessed at seven years in the penitentiary. The signing of another form by the foreman of the jury was merely a clerical error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12339]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order 13224, as amended (“E.O. 13224” or “Order”), I hereby determine that the person known as Ansarallah (also known as Ansar Allah, Ansarullah, Partisans of God, Supporters of God, and Houthi group) is a foreign person who has committed or attempted to commit, poses a significant risk of committing, or has participated in training to commit, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    The designation goes into effect on February 16, 2024. This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 12, 2024.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-04065 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Executive Order 13167

# Amendment to Executive Order 13147, Increasing the Membership of the White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), and in order to increase the membership of the White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy from not more than 15 members to up to 20 members, it is hereby ordered that the second sentence of section 1 of Executive Order 13147 of May 7, 2000, is amended by deleting “not more than 15” and inserting “up to 20” in lieu thereof.

[FR Doc. 00-24364

Billing code 3195-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**SEAN DAVID O'CONNER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 427 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0335

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:32PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 02/12/2010 06:31PM 

cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Clarifying questions on RICE

Hi Melanie,

Attached you'll find a spreadsheet of the costs and benefits for area source engines between 

300 and 500 HP. The attached analysis shows that requiring controls for these engines, if 

they run less than ~100 hrs per year, is not cost-beneficial (costs of controls exceed the 

PM2.5 benefits). Do you know how many engines in this group run less than 100 hours per 

year and are not emergency engines? 

Additionally, for these sized engines running 100 hours, the estimate of reporting costs is 1/3 

of the total annual costs. Given that these engines will have control devices installed, and 

emissions reductions will be achieved, is there any flexibility to ease the reporting 

requirements? Furthermore, is there any flexibility in lessening in the reporting requirements 

for the area source engines subject to emissions limits (and thus technology controls)?

Thanks,

Cortney

Page 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended February 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  April 3, 2007



|By:   | /s/ Emanuel Chirico                     | 
|----- | --------------------------------------- | 
|Name: | Emanuel Chirico
Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 11, 2009

/s/ John CalysJohn CalysVice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Energy & Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jimmy Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: August 16, 2010By: /s/ JIMMY WANGJimmy WangChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
[Cite as State v. Parr , 2018-Ohio-2265.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-01-005

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 6/11/2018 : THOMAS A. PARR, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 17CR32707

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, 520 Justice Drive, Lebanon, OH 45036, for plaintiff-appellee Engel & Martin, LLC, Mary K. Martin, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, OH 45040, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Thomas A. Parr, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1)Warren CA2018-01-005 indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 102   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 90     | 111    | 200    | 211    | 294    | 199    | 403    | 179    | 219    | 228   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 82     | 515    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 53    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 60     | 65     | 69     | 58     | 79     | 79     | 57     | 54     | 60     | 48    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 39     | 32     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China Ding Cheng Science Holdings Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Frank Pioppi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: February 10, 2010 /s/ Frank Pioppi Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R OB E R T A C AB AN AZ S T AL E Y, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50147 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 6 0 9 - GA F ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G aryA . F e e s s , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , M c K E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R o b e rtaC ab an a z S ta le yap p e a ls f r o m h e rg u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rh e a lth care fr aud, i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . § 1 34 7, for w hi ch she w as se nt ence d t o three y e a r s of pr oba t i on. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), S taley’s 

# FI LED FEB 24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50147 2 c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dth e ap p e llan t th e o p p o rtu n ity t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef h a s b e e n f

ile d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D, an dth e d istrict co u rt’s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
Order filed April 2, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00568-CV

____________

WILLIAM DEXTER LUCAS, Appellant

V.

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No 2

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-CCV-065346

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due February 6, 2020. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before May 4, 2020, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.