alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home Inland Fisheries Fish Coastal Cutthroat Trout



### Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii

The coastal cutthroat is one of the three native cutthroat subspecies in California. The coastal cutthroat is characterized by profuse spotting on the body and the typical red-orange slashes under the jaw. These marks may fade or disappear completely when the fish resides in salt water. Anglers often mistake coastal cutthroats for ra inbow trout. In California, the native range of the coastal cutthroat begins near the Eel River drainage and includes drainages north to Oregon and beyond into Alaska. Many of the populations are anadromous, "sea-run" cutthroat. Others are freshwat er residents and some travel between the brackish estuaries and the freshwater tributaries. Although much of the native range is still occupied their numbers have suffered declines. In most areas where cutthroat exist, fishing oppotunities have be en limited by restrictions to protect anadromous salmonids. There are some waters that feature special regulations for cutthroat, however, so be sure to check the regulations before fishing.

Conditions of Use| Privacy Policy 

### Coastal Cutthroat Trout - California Department of Fish and W ildlife http://www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/resources/WildTrout/WT_CCutDesc. asp

1 of 1 4/20/2016 4:50 PM
Exhibit 4.391

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 171678 dated January 29, 2019

 

To render

 

cable radio services

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

January 29, 2024

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 38-рчс dated January 29, 2019

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of this meeting is for the Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries to review the actuarial methods and assumptions used in the valuations of the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF).

# DATES:

The Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries plans to meet on Friday, May 17, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will start at 10 a.m. EDT and will be held at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Kissel, Senior Actuary for Pension Programs, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW, Room 4316, Washington, DC 20415, or by email to                         *actuary@opm.gov*                         or by phone at (202) 606-1774.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

1. Summary of Recent Legislative proposals

2. Review of Actuarial Assumptions

a. Demographic Assumptions

b. Economic Assumptions

3. CSRDF Annual Report

                    Persons desiring to attend this meeting of the Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries, or to make a statement for consideration at the meeting, should contact OPM at least 5 business days in advance of the meeting date at the address shown in the                     **ADDRESSES**                     section of this notice. Any detailed information or analysis requested for the Board to consider should be submitted at least 15 business days in advance of the meeting date. The manner and time for any material presented to or considered by the Board may be limited.                

Office of Personnel Management.

Kayyonne Marston,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2024-04011 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-64-P
#### Bobby Joe CHILCUTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28765.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Henry M. Wade, Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Drunken driving is the offense; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $125.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1036

WALTER E. BESS, JR.; DONNA G. BESS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JUDGE TAYLOR; CORPORAL WAMSLEY, Badge 256;

CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District

Judge. (CA-98-0539)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter E. Bess, Jr., Donna G. Bess, Appellants Pro Se. Richard

Gregory McNeer, CAMPBELL, WOODS, BAGLEY, EMERSON, MCNEER & HERNDON,

Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,

361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty

days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal

from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only

exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends

the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on December 4, 1998;

Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed on January 5, 1999, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellants’ failure to note

a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellants’ appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PUMPS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on the 

Framework documents addressing potential energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial 

pumps. 

 

Agenda

9:00 – 9:30 am Welcome and Introductions, Opening Remarks 

 Doug Brookman 

 

9:30 – 9:45 am Introduction and Rulemaking Process Overview

 Charles Llenza 

 Summary of the rulemaking process.

9:45 – 10:30 am Legislative History and Scope of Coverage

 Charles Llenza

Summary presentation and discussion regarding statutory authority of pumps for 

which DOE is considering standards, definitions, and other parameters. 

10:30 – 10:45 am Break

10:45 – 11:45 am Regulatory Regimes and Metrics

 Alison Williams 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the pumping system, regulatory 

regimes, and efficiency metrics.

 

11:45 – 12:00 pm Test Procedure

 Sarah Widder 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the industry test procedures for 

commercial and industrial pumps.

12:00 – 1:00 pm Lunch
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PUMPS

Agenda (cont.)

1:00 – 1:30 pm Market and Technology Assessment; Screening Analysis

 Alison Williams 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the market and technology assessment and screening 

analysis. 

1:30 – 2:15 pm Engineering Analysis and Manufacturer Impact Analysis

 Dan Weintraub

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the engineering analysis and the manufacturer impact 

analysis.

2:15 – 2:45 pm Markups Analysis; Energy Use Analysis 

 Sarah Widder 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and

factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price and the energy 

use analysis. 

2:45 – 3:00 pm Break

3:00 – 3:30 pm Life-Cycle Costs and Payback Period Analysis; Shipments Analysis; 

National Impact Analysis; NOPR Analyses 

 Alison Williams 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the life-cycle cost and payback period analysis, the 

shipments analysis, and the national impact analysis.

3:30 – 3:45 pm NOPR Analyses

 Alison Williams

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the additional analyses of the NOPR phase: emissions, 

monetization, utility, employment, and regulatory impacts. 

 

3:45 – 4:00 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks 

 Charles Llenza
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 26916.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The record contains no notice of appeal, and this Court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Virginia Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Tennessee (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Virginia Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Tennessee (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 40    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 22     | 52     | 52     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
Abdoulline,  as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of  section  13(a)  of
the  Securities   Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


By: /S/ Albert Abdoulline
-------------------------
Albert Abdoulline
President, CEO
Date: November 13, 2006
##### 








---



##### 



Affiliate
 Beneficiary
 Committee
 Common Stock Share
 Company
 Eligible Employee
 Employee




---



##### 



Employer
 Option Plan
 Options
 Participant
 Person
 Plan
 Plan Year
 Special Bonus Amount
 Subsidiary
 
 Participation
 Continuity of Participation




---



##### 



Special Bonus Amounts
 
 Timing of Distribution of Special Bonus Amounts.
 Form of Distribution
 No Deferral Election
 Beneficiary Designation




---



##### 



Vesting in Special Bonus Amounts
 
  
 Administration
 Interpretation




---



##### 



Amendment and Termination provided
 
 Right to Employment
 Alienation or Assignment of Benefits
 Severability
 Right to Withhold




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Effective Date
 Date: November 12, 2007
    ITC HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Linda H. BlairLinda H. BlairIts:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Business
Officer
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Trustees of
Pioneer Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Pioneer Fund
for the year ended  December  31, 1999,  we  considered  its  internal  control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities,  in order to determine
our  auditing  procedures  for the  purpose  of  expressing  our  opinion on the
financial  statements and to comply with the  requirements of Form N-SAR, not to
provide assurance on internal control.

The management of Pioneer Fund is responsible for  establishing  and maintaining
internal control. In fulfilling this responsibility,  estimates and judgments by
management  are  required to assess the expected  benefits and related  costs of
controls.  Generally,  controls  that are  relevant  to an audit  pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial  statements for external purposes that
are  fairly   presented  in  conformity  with  generally   accepted   accounting
principles.   Those  controls   include  the   safeguarding  of  assets  against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent  limitations in internal  control,  error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also,  projection of any evaluation of internal control to
future periods is subject to the risk that it may become  inadequate  because of
changes in conditions or that the  effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all matters
in  internal   control  that  might  be  material   weaknesses  under  standards
established  by the  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more
of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the
risk  that  misstatements  caused  by error or fraud in  amounts  that  would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not
be  detected  within a timely  period  by  employees  in the  normal  course  of
performing  their assigned  functions.  However,  we noted no matters  involving
internal  control  and  its  operation,   including  controls  for  safeguarding
securities,  that we consider to be material  weaknesses  as defined above as of
December 31, 1999.

This report is intended solely for the  information  and use of management,  the
Board of Trustees of Pioneer Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
February 4, 2000
#### Alden COLEMAN, Appellant, v. PIKEVILLE CAR SALES, Inc., et al., Appellees. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Alden COLEMAN, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 11, 1954.

V. R. Bentley, Pikeville, for'Alden Coleman.

Kenneth A. Howe, Pikeville, for Commercial Credit Corp.

Blaine H. Rutherford, Pikeville, for Pikeville Car Sales.

V. R. Bentley, Pikeville, for Alden Coleman.

PER CURIAM.

These cases are before us on motion for appeal under KRS 21.080, and involve judgments for less than $2,500. The cases were consolidated for trial, and were tried before a commissioner.

We conclude that the judgment of the trial court does substantial justice in each case, and, not being clearly erroneous,, should not be set aside.' CR 52.01.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is .affirmed.
#### FAIR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 6361.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

June 2, 1937.

Franklin F. Russell, of New York City, for petitioner.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, J., Louis Monarch and Joseph M. Jones, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before BUFFINGTON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. The petitioner is the executrix of the estate of William B. Fair, deceased. The decedent, a citizen of the State of New Jersey, died July 12, 1932. At the time of his death he was the owner of three hypotecas upon lands in Cuba. The Commissioner included the value of those hypotecas in the decedent’s gross estate and assessed a deficiency. The applicable statute is section 302(a) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 70), which reads:

> “The value of the gross estate of the decedent shall be determined by including the value at the time of his death of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated—

> “(a) To the extent of the interest therein of the decedent at the time of his death.”

Had this section alone been presented to us for construction, it would appear that the value of the hypotecas was properly included in-the decedent’s gross estate. The Attorney General, however, in an opinion dated May 14, 1918 (31 Op.Attys.Gen. 287), said, concerning a substantially similar provision of the Revenue Act of 1916: “Real estate as such located outside of the United States, belonging to a decedent resident within the United States should not be included in determining the value of the gross estate of such decedent for the purposes of the tax imposed by Title II of the revenue act of September 8, 1916 (39 Stat. 777).” The Treasury Department accepted this view and incorporated the ruling in 2 T.D. 3735,20 Treasury Decisions 435: "The *219value of real estate, belonging to a decedent resident within the United States at the time of his death, located outside of the United States, meaning thereby the States, Territories of Alaska and Hawaii, and the District of- Columbia, should not be included in determining the value of the gross estate of such decedent for the purposes of the tax imposed by Title II of the revenue act of September 8, 1916.” The same limiting thought was incorporated in the subsequent taxing act of 1934, where section 404 (26 U.S.C.A. § 411) specifically excepts real property situated outside the United States from inclusion in a decedent’s gross estate.

The “hypotecas” in question are, describing them rather freely, mortgages without accompanying bond and without a personal debt obligation on the part of the mortgagor. They are classified by Cuban law as “immovables,” which term is substantially equivalent to our term “real property.” As real property situated outside the United States the value of the hypotecas should have been excluded from the decedent’s gross estate and exempted from the transfer inheritance tax.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed.
#### Robert SONCUYA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27379.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4 721

_____________________________
F REDERICK S TEVEN M ARSHALL J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circ uit Court for Baker County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. January 25, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00324-CR

KELVIN MILES A/K/A KELVIN KARL MILES

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20FC-5168B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 25, 2022