alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable John B. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of

South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2637

___________

Richard Hopewell, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Paul A. Richards, * District of South Dakota. 

 *

Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: August 6, 1999

 Filed: August 12, 1999 

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hopewell appeals from the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment

to attorney Paul A. Richards in this diversity action. We conclude that the district court

was not required to compel compliance with a local rule that required a summary

judgment movant to provide a statement of undisputed material facts, where the court

found the issues had otherwise been adequately developed by the parties. See Drake

v. Scott, 812 F.2d 395, 401 (8th Cir.) (“It is normally for the district court to enforce
-2-

compliance with its local rules.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 965 (1987). We note,

moreover, that Mr. Hopewell had himself characterized Mr. Richards’s motion to

dismiss as one for summary judgment, he had ample time to respond the motion, he

referred the court to documents outside the pleadings, and he did not object at the

hearing when the district court stated it would treat the motion as one for summary

judgment. See Madewell v. Downs, 68 F.3d 1030, 1048 (8th Cir. 1995). 

We conclude that the judgment is correct and an extended opinion would have

no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See

8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                              
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Central & Eastern) Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                              
|Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore (Central & Eastern) Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 616   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 790    | 1,861  | 1,077  | 567    | 648    | 627    | 629    | 1,017  | 736    | 514   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 325    | 654    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### UNPUBLISHED 

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 99-4677



# 
K EITH D ARNELL B ILLINGS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.

(CR-99-249) Submitted: October 20, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELLouis H. Lang, CALLISON, TIGHE & ROBINSON, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION PER CURIAM:Keith Darnell Billings appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base and powder cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.On appeal, Billings contends that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000),requires that his conviction and sentence be vacated. Because Billings’ sentence of 210 months does not exceed the twenty-year statutory maximum set out in 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999) for the core offense without enhancement for drug quantity, we find that his sentence is permissible under Apprendi

. See United States v. Angle , Nos. 96-4662/4672, 99-4187, 2000 WL 1515159, *10 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2000); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir. 2000).Accordingly, we affirm Billings’ conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ILLINGS
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 211   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 709    | 679    | 744    | 994    | 683    | 386    | 694    | 407    | 343    | 287   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 574    | 586    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 2      | 1      | 11     | 1      | 10     | 14     | 1      | W      | W     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION





I, Terry
McConnaughey. certify that:





1. I, and
the other certifying officer, have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Silver Butte Co., Inc.





2. Based on
our knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on
our knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report.





4. I, and
the other certifying officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:


a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) [Not
required].


c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and


d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.





5. We have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s board of
directors:


a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.







Date:
July 15, 2008




By: /s/ Terry
McConnaughey


Terry
McConnaughey, President and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4559 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4559

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbofuran technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Carbofuran technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBOFURAN TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        2,3-dihydro-2,2-    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          dimethyl-7-                                                       12/31/2015
                          benzofuranyl
                          methylcarbamate
                          (Carbofuran
                          technical) (CAS
                          No. 1563-66-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2932.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
3.9


AEROGROW
INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
Nevada corporation




AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS


Effective
as of June 29, 2009






The
Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”)
of AeroGrow International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”),
are hereby amended as follows:




A new
Article IX is hereby added to the Bylaws and reads in its entirety as
follows:




CONTROL
SHARES ACT




Pursuant
to Section 78.378 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the provisions of Nevada
Revised Statutes 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive and including any subsequent
amendments thereto, do not apply to the corporation.




Except as
modified herein, the Bylaws, as amended, remain in full force and effect as
originally adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.




Certification




The
foregoing Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation was
adopted by its Board of Directors via a Unanimous Written Consent in lieu of a
Special Meeting of the Board of Directors effective as of June 29,
2009.








/s/  Jervis
      B.
      PerkinsJervis
      B. Perkins, Chief Executive
    Officer
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:59bcc05e-b10e-49f6-afa4-bfcee383ff9a,g:85b40555-b258-4fe2-bb91-226bb495b1e1-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:pvh="http://www.pvh.com/20220329" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.pvh.com/20220329">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021/dei-2021.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20220329_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20220329_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="DocumentandEntityInformationDocument" roleURI="http://www.pvh.com/role/DocumentandEntityInformationDocument">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Document and Entity Information Document</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
  <xs:element id="pvh_CoverPageAbstract" abstract="true" name="CoverPageAbstract" nillable="true" xbrli:periodType="duration" substitutionGroup="xbrli:item" type="xbrli:stringItemType"/>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER KING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS § § No. 278, 2020 § § Submitted: September 1, 2020 Decided: October 8, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES Justices.

ORDER After consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus and the State’s answer and motion to dismiss, it appears to the Court that: (1) On March 16, 2015, the petitioner, Christopher King, pleaded guilty to second-degree burglary in Criminal ID No. 1408020918 and second-degree rape in Criminal ID No. 1408022997 in exchange for the dismissal of other charges. 1 The Superior Court immediately sentenced King as follows: (i) for second-degree rape, effective August 22, 2014, twenty-five years of Level V incarceration, suspended after seventeen years for decreasing levels of supervision; and (ii) for second-degree burglary, seven years of Level V incarceration. King did not appeal his convictions

or sentence.

1 The Court has taken judicial notice of these cases.2

(2) On August 17, 2020, King filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Superior Court to give him 197 days of credit for time he spent in jail between his arrest on August 29, 2014 and his sentencing on March 16, 2015. A writ of mandamus will only issue if the petitioner can show: (i) a clear right to the performance of a duty; (ii) that no other adequate remedy is available; and (iii) the trial court has arbitrarily failed or refused to perform its duty. 2 “[I]n the absence of a clear showing of an arbitrary refusal or failure to act, this Court will not issue a writ of mandamus to compel a trial court to perform a particular judicial function, to decide a matter in a particular way, or to dictate the control of its docket.” 3 (3) King has not shown that the Superior Court arbitrarily failed or refused to perform a duty owed to him. “[A] defendant must be credited with all Level V time served in default of bail either by ‘backdating’ the effective date to the date of incarceration or by crediting the defendant with the time served.” 4 The Superior Court sentenced King effective August 22, 2014, a week before his August 29, 2014 arrest date. Not only did King receive credit for the time he was incarcerated before he pleaded guilty and was sentenced, he appears to have received an additional seven-days of credit toward his Level V sentence.

2 In re Bordley , 545 A.2d 619, 620 (Del. 1988). 3 Id. 4 McNair v. State , 2011 WL 768639, at *1 (Del. Mar. 4, 2011). See also 11 Del. C. § 3901(b), (c).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The petition for a writ of mandamus is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice