alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(i)
 CHARTER
OF THE
JOINT AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF
COMM BANCORP, INC.
AND
COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
 Purpose
  
    
    The integrity of the Companys financial statements;
    
    The audit by the public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (the registered public accounting firm) of the Companys financial
reports;
    
    The Companys reports on internal controls;
    
    The registered public accounting and internal auditing firms qualifications and
independence; and
    
    The performance of the Companys internal audit function.
  Membership
 sm
 220




---



##### 



Authority
  Responsibilities
  221




---



##### 



222




---



##### 



Reliance on Information
  223
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




By
signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White
River Capital, Inc.




Date:
March 14, 2008.









/s/
      John
      M. Eggemeyer, IIIJohn
      M. Eggemeyer, IIIChief
      Executive Officer












/s/
      Martin
      J. SzumskiMartin
      J. SzumskiChief
      Financial Officer
|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History:                                         
|                                                      
|No chart available.                                   
|No chart available.                                   
|                                                      
|                                                      
|Oklahoma Non-Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-50514

Summary Calendar

_____________________

TERRENCE R. SPELLMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAN MORALES, Attorney General, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-94-CV-464)

_________________________________________________________________

April 9, 1996

Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrence Spellmon appeals from the dismissal of his suit,

without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state-court remedies. 

Because Spellmon fails to state a constitutional violation, he

has not stated a claim for relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2254

or 42 U.S.C. § 1983. see Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th

Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 736 (1996). The district

court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Pete HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28066.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $250.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 10, 2009 /s/ Dominick Pope
 Chief Financial Officer
| **NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Aug. 03, 2014 | Aug. 04, 2013 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]**         |          |          |
| Number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting                                       | 1.0           | 0.2           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_NumberOfDilutiveSharesIssuedUponVesting**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), rendered March 8, 1988 and April 6, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, *IV2*to 4 Vi, and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of murder and other charges for *147the sidewalk shooting of Nelo Reyes during an argument in broad daylight in upper Manhattan on August 22, 1986. Three days after the murder, an eyewitness, David Benito, identified defendant as the perpetrator from a single photograph shown him by police officers. In his Grand Jury testimony, Benito stated that prior to the murder, he had seen defendant entering the store where he worked at least 48 times. On August 27, 1986, defendant was apprehended in immediate flight from an armed robbery. The weapon possessed by defendant at that time, a .38 caliber revolver, was proved by ballistics evidence to be the murder weapon. At that time, a toy cap pistol was also recovered.

Initially, defendant argues that the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion to suppress Benito’s identification. We disagree. In view of Benito’s Grand Jury testimony, it was clear that the photographic display was merely confirmatory in nature, and that there was no potential suggestiveness in displaying the photograph to Benito. *(People v Fleming,*109 AD2d 848.) Under these circumstances, it was unnecessary to conduct a hearing on the motion to suppress *(People v Vargas,*118 Misc 2d 477).

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s discharge of a sworn juror has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law. Although *People v Page*(72 NY2d 69) makes clear that the trial court, when discharging a sworn juror, must make a complete statement of its reasons on the record, we can only infer from the silent record in the present case that defendant had acquiesced in the substitution of jurors.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation comments do not require reversal in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt.

Similarly, questions propounded by the prosecutor at trial regarding the toy pistol recovered following the unrelated robbery could hardly have prejudiced defendant, especially in view of the fact that the court admonished the jury not to consider them. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kassal, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended August 5, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  September 13, 2007



|By:   | /s/ Emanuel Chirico                     | 
|----- | --------------------------------------- | 
|Name: | Emanuel Chirico
Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Notice to Holders of
United Chile Synthetic Options
 Right to Amend Grant Agreement
 December 16, 2008
   This Notice is delivered to advise you of the determination by the LGI Committee to afford
each holder of United Chile Options a one-time opportunity to amend Section 2(d)(iii) of the Grant
Agreement to extend the 90-day period therein to a period of one year following the termination of
such holders employment or consulting relationship with the Company. A conforming amendment would
also be made to Section 2(d)(ii) . If you elect to so amend the Grant Agreement, the amendment will
apply to all of your United Chile Options.




---



##### 



You may elect to amend Section 2(d)(ii) and Section 2(d)(iii) as provided above only by
executing and returning the attached Amendment Election Form to United Chile LLC, attention
Elizabeth Markowski, no later than Tuesday, December 30, 2008. Delivery of the Amendment Election
Form may be effected through any of the following means: (1) personal delivery to LGIs corporate
headquarters at 12300 Liberty Boulevard, Englewood Colorado, 80112, USA, (2) facsimile delivery to
+1 303.220.6691, or (3) email delivery to liz@lgi.com . If delivery is by facsimile or email,
please also forward an original executed copy by courier to the attention of Elizabeth M. Markowski
at LGIs corporate headquarters at the address set forth above. If you fail to timely deliver the
duly executed Amendment Election Form to United Chile LLC, you will be deemed to have elected not
to amend the Grant Agreement with respect to your United Chile Synthetic Options.
  liz@lgi.com




---



##### 



United Chile Synthetic Option Holder  Amendment Election Form
     EMPLOYEE
    
    DATE
|                        |                                         |                     |                      |                                          |                                  |                        |                            |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Security Type          | Security Class Title                    | Fee CalculationRule | Amount Registered(1) | Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit | Maximum Aggregate Offering Price | Fee Rate               | Amount of Registration Fee |
| Equity                 | Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share | Other (2)           | 2,989,000            | $82.625 (2)                              | $246,966,125.00 (2)              | $110.20 per $1,000,000 | $27,215.67                 |
| Total Offering Amounts |                                         | $246,966,125.00     |                      | $27,215.67                               |
| Total Fee Offsets      |                                         |                     |                      | $0                                       |
| Net Fee Due            |                                         |                     |                      | $27,215.67                               |
NUMBER 13-15-00-352-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE MING CHU CHANG, KEN MOK, AND JORGE GONZALEZ III

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Per Curiam Order

Relators, Ming Chu Chang, Ken Mok, and Jorge Gonzalez III, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus and motion for emergency temporary relief in the above cause on July 

30, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to 

vacate a July 7, 2015 discovery order requiring relators to produce their income tax 

returns. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency 

temporary relief, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for 

emergency temporary relief is hereby GRANTED, and that portion of the trial court’s July 
2

7, 2015 discovery order which requires the production of income tax returns is ordered 

STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is 

effective until the case is finally decided.”). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, James R. Williams, or any others 

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but not limited to 

American First National Bank or George West 59 Investments, Inc., file a response to the 

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this 

order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

31st day of July, 2015.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 51 
          - [CC Docket No. 98-147; FCC 00-297] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

On August 10, 2000, the Federal Communications Commission released an Order on Reconsideration strengthening the collocation requirements placed upon incumbent local exchange carriers pursuant to section 251(c)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. This notice announces an effective date of October 10, 2000 for rules adopted in that Order that contained modified or new information collection requirements. 

# DATES:

Sections 51.321(f), 51.323(b), and 51.323(l)(1) published at 65 FR 54433 (September 8, 2000) are effective on October 10, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Kehoe, Special Counsel, Common Carrier Bureau, Policy and Program Planning Division, 202-418-1580. Further information also may be obtained by calling the Common Carrier Bureau's TTY number: 202-418-0484. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On September 1, 2000, the Office of Management and Budget approved the information collections adopted in the Order on Reconsideration pursuant to OMB Control No. 3060-0848. Accordingly, the modified or new information collection requirements in sections 51.321(f), 51.323(b), and section 51.323(l)(1) will take effect on October 10, 2000, the same date as the other rules adopted in the Order on Reconsideration. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 51

      - Communications
      - Common carriers
      - Telecommunications
      - Collocation

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-24327 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2289 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to reform the Federal Communications Commission by requiring an analysis of benefits and costs 

during the rule making process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2011 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to reform the 

Federal Communications Commission by requiring an 

analysis of benefits and costs during the rule making 

process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FCC ‘ABCs’ Act of 

5 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2289 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANALYSIS OF BENEFITS AND COSTS IN FCC RULE 

2 MAKING PROCESS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4 of the Communications 

4 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 154) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(p) The Commission shall include in each notice of 

7 proposed rule making and in each final rule issued by the 

8 Commission an analysis of the benefits and costs of the 

9 proposed rule or final rule, respectively.’’. 

10 (b) NO ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS AUTHOR11 IZED.—The amendment made by subsection (a) does not 

12 authorize any appropriations for the express purpose, in 

13 whole or in part, of carrying out such amendment. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EX-32.2  ex322.txt SILVER BUTTE MINING COMPANY FORM 10QSB

CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Evans, director and secretary/treasurer of
Silver Butte Mining Company (the "Company") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

1.	This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended February 24, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the
Company.
Date:  April 9, 2004

By    _____/s/ Robert J. Evans    _______
Robert J. Evans, Secretary/Treasurer and Director

1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and Co-Chief
Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our respective knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation
Group, Inc.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|            |  |                                                        
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|May 4, 2005 |  | /s/ William R. Cruz                                    
|Date        |  | William R. Cruz                                        
|            |  | Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive
Officer
|            | 
|May 4, 2005 |  | /s/ Ralph L. Cruz                                      
|Date        |  | Ralph L. Cruz                                          
|            |  | Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive
Officer