alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte Pat PAULOS.

No. 28021.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1956.

John Cutler, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Harris County, Eugene Brady, Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Harris County, Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ' .

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of 'the judge of the County Court at Law No. 3, of Harris-County, refusing to discharge;relator upon the writ of habeas corpus.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. . There is nothing showing that the trial court’s order was not proper or justified.

The judgment remanding relator is affirmed. *
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135291 & (24) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JOHNNY TIPPINS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices 

v SC: 135291 

 COA: 278887 
 Wayne CC: 02-001578-01

WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Texas (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Gulf Of Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Texas (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 6,647  | 5,953  | 5,298  | 6,044  | 6,364  | 5,097  | 4,778  | 5,355 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,529  | 4,189  | 3,759  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### SPRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 26998.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1954.

Tirey & Tirey, Waco, Jack W. Prescott, Cameron, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from a life sentence for murder.

In view of the disposition hereof a statement of the evidence is not deemed necessary.

Bill of Exception No. 1 relates to argument of the prosecutor. It is apparent that during the course of his investigation of the *192case the prosecutor had secured a statement from one of his witnesses. Such statement had not been introduced in evidence. In his argument, he “was holding the paper about which he was talking in his hand and waving it before the jury and was pointing to and referring to said paper” when he said:

> “There has been testimony from Isaah Woodard that he had come to the Courthouse immediately after this killing and made a written statement at that time, a sworn statement at that time. That testimony was brought out from him and brought out again by Mr. Prescott that he had made that state*ment*— substantially *stating what he stated on this stand*

The court seemed to recognize that counsel was testifying because he said, “You are outside the record, Mr. State’s Attorney * * but he overruled the objection and refused to instruct the jury not to consider the same.

This was, of course, going outside the record in order to bolster his own witness. The harmful effect of the error is apparent.

Also the contention is raised that a new trial should have been granted under Section 7 of Article 753, C.C.P.

It was shown on the hearing of appellant’s motion for new trial that after the jury had agreed on a verdict of guilty, and while they were divided as to the punishment to be assessed, an unidentified juror represented to a fellow juror who was voting for a term of years, that if the punishment was assessed at life, appellant could not be paroled, whereas if a term of years was, assessed he would be able to obtain a parole.

Following this statement, the juror changed his vote from five years to life.

We cannot agree that the testimony of seven of the jurors to the effect that they did not hear or make the statement was sufficient to authorize the trial judge to conclude that the remark was not made.

The statement of the unidentified juror constituted the giving of testimony to the jury — -testimony which was clearly wrong; and under our holding in Price v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 161, 199 S.W.2d 168, a reversal is called for.

Our holding here is distinguishable from that in the recent case of Montello v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 267 S.W.2d 557, for the reason that a juror asserted as a fact that the law does not permit the granting of paroles to life termers, which was not correct.

Other claims of error need not be considered as the matters complained of will not likely occur on another trial.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Bonnie Biumi, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20 -F of NCL Corporation Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: March 28, 2006        /s/ Bonnie Biumi         Name: Bonnie Biumi    Title: Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,581-06

EX PARTE TRACY DION WHITAKER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 18CR20817C IN THE 123 DISTRICT COURT RD

FROM SHELBY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guiltyto engaging in organized criminal activityand was sentenced to fifty

years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to consult with a

mental health expert and failed to investigate or call Applicant’s co-defendant to testify. Applicant

has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex

parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall ordertrial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing
2

the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the

hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court

shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 2, 2022

Do not publish
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Wayne Peters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Avicena Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ D. Wayne Peters           
|    |  | D. Wayne Peters,              
|    |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. White, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 16, 2009 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History: Annual                            
|View History: Annual                            
|View History:                                   
|                                                
|Idaho Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                
|                                                
|Idaho Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 41     | 179    | 113    | 91     | 45    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 15     | 41     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Gordon Samson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CYOP Systems International Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: June 10, 2003

/s/ Gordon Samson

Gordon Samson

Chief Financial Officer
# United States Departmen t of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE In Reply Refer To: FWS/ AES/DER/BCH/060 156 FWS HQ: 2012-F-0004 Ms. Deborah G. Nagle Director, Water Permits Division Office ofWastewater Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Washi ngton, D .C. 20240 

## MAY 

# n5 

# 2015

Subject: Biological Opinion for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity Dear Ms. Nagle: This letter transmits the U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion (Opinion) based on our review ofthe proposed re-issuance ofthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MultiSector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity, and its effects on listed species and designated critical habitat in accordance with section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your January 27,2014, request for formal consultation was received via email. Additional coordination is described in the attached Opinion. This Opinion is based on information provided in the January 27, 2014, Biological Evaluation, additional information received, and other sources ofinformation. A complete record ofthis consultation is on file at this office. Ifyou have any questions or concerns about this Opinion or the consultation process in general, please feel free to contact Ms. Karen Myers (703-358-2353, Karen_Myers@fws.gov) or Mr. George Noguchi (703-358-1857, George

_Noguchi@ fws.gov) ofmy staff.

Enclosure Sincerely,



# ~Av~ **1** Craig Aubrey Chief, Division ofE ironmental Review, Ecological Services Program
#### GANT v. STATE.

No. 26961.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 28, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $200.'

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION





I, Matthew D. Thompson, hereby certify that:





1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012; and





2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: April 30, 2013/s/ Matthew D. ThompsonMatthew D. ThompsonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000413 13-FEB-2014 09:45 AM