alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3 

Idaho Power Company Environmental Department, Aquatics 

MikroKopter Pre-Flight Checklist 

1. Ensure that the transmitter and MikroKopter battery are fully charged. 

2. Inspect the MikroKopter for visible damage (lose screws, cracked 

propellers, damaged wires, loose connections, etc.). 

3. Inspect the launch and flight area for hazards (trees, buildings, wires, 

etc.). 

4. Place required UAS flight notice flagging. 

5. Place MikroKopter on level ground (leveling bubble is helpful). 

6. Tum on ground station, and start MK-Tools. 

7. Tum on transmitter. 

8. Ensure that MikroKopter battery is secure, and connect it. 

9. Allow the electronics to initiate (listen for the "beeps," and watch to 

ensure each motor goes through a brief revolution). 

10. Conduct a pre-flight calibration (left stick to upper left position -listen for 

"beeps"). 

11. After pre-flight calibration, and using MK-Tools, ensure that the controls 

are functioning correctly: 

a. Nick (forward and backward) 

b. Roll (left and right) · 

c. Yaw (clock- and counterclockwise) 

d. Camera Gimbal 

e. Altitude lock 

f. Position hold (if GPS is active) 

g. Come home (if GPS is active) 

12. Check OSD screen in MK-Tools to ensure that readouts are normal: 
a. Elevation 

b. GPS signal 

c. Battery charge 

d. Distance from launch 

e. Speed 

f. Total time 

13. Fill out flight log book: 

a. Date 

b. Time at site 

c. Location 

d. Project 

e. Operator 

f. Observer(s) 

g. Battery ID 

h. Battery voltage at start 

14. Load waypoints (ifbeing used). 

15. Ensure that "altitude lock" is "off'. 

16. If"position hold, "come home", or waypoint functions are to be used, 

ensure that GPS signal is present. · 

17. Loudly declare "Motors On." 

18. Initiate motors (left stick to lower right position). 

19. Confirm that all is good with the ground station and observer. 

20. Loudly declare "Take Off'. 

21. Conduct flight as planned. 

22. Upon landing: 

a. Turn off motors (left stick to lower left position) 

b. Disconnect battery from MikroKopter 

c. Turn off transmitter 

2 
MikroKopter Post-Flight Checklist 

1. Record flight data to logbook: 

a. Total flight time 

b. Battery charge at end of flight 

c. Battery mAh used during flight 

d. Maximum altitude during flight 

e. Time off site 

£Comments concerning flight (especially any abnormal activities) 

2. Inspect the MikroKopter for visible damage (lose screws, cracked 

propellers, damaged wires, loose connections, etc.). 

3. Download flight data .gpx file to digital storage device. 

3
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 49    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 52     | 47     | 80     | 57     | 68     | 89     | 36     | 38     | 19     | 18    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 42     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00056-CV

MARC III GENERAL CONTRACTORS LLC,

Appellant

v.

Denis MEJIA,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-08438

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 2, 2014

MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

The parties have filed an Agreed Motion to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment Without 

Regard to the Merits. We grant the motion. The trial court’s judgment dated October 30, 2013 is 

hereby vacated, this appeal is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court for proceedings 

consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(e). 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4467 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4467

   To amend section 520E of the Public Health Service act to require 
    States and their designees receiving grants for development or 
 implementation of statewide suicide early intervention and prevention 
  strategies to consult with each Federally recognized Indian tribe, 
    tribal organization, and urban Indian organization in the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 520E of the Public Health Service act to require 
    States and their designees receiving grants for development or 
 implementation of statewide suicide early intervention and prevention 
  strategies to consult with each Federally recognized Indian tribe, 
    tribal organization, and urban Indian organization in the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Suicide Prevention 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. CONSULTATION WITH FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBES, TRIBAL 
              ORGANIZATIONS, AND URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS IN 
              DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF STATEWIDE SUICIDE EARLY 
              INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION STRATEGIES.

    Subsection (e) of section 520E of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 290bb-36) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Consultation with federally recognized indian tribes, 
        tribal organizations, and urban indian organizations.--As a 
        condition on the receipt of a grant or cooperative agreement 
        under this section for development or implementation of a 
        statewide early intervention and prevention strategy, a State 
        or an eligible entity designated by a State pursuant to 
        subsection (b)(1)(B) shall agree to consult with each Federally 
        recognized Indian tribe and tribal organization (as defined in 
        the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) and 
        each urban Indian organization (as defined in the Indian Health 
        Care Improvement Act) regarding such development or 
        implementation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WADE v. STATE.

No. 23917.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of driving on a public highway while intoxicated, and assessed a fine of one hundred dollars.

The evidence of the State is amply sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. However, appellant took the witness stand and denied that he was intoxicated and brought several witnesses, including his wife and some boys with whom he had worked and associated, who gave positive testimony in his favor on the subject. The only issue before the jury was whether or not he was intoxicated.

In his concluding argument the county attorney said, as shown by the only bill of exception in the case: “It is well known that every time any colored boy who is charged with any offense in this court, that all of his other colored friends will come into court and swear just anything necessary to get him out of it.” The bill further shows that objection was immediately made to this argument on the ground that it was prejudicial, was an appeal to race prejudice, was the unsworn testimony of the county attorney, not in answer to any argument of the defense and not supported by any evidence in the case. The court approved the bill with this statement.

In his brief the State’s Attorney says, “In our opinion, the argument complained of was improper, in that the prosecuting attorney was asserting a fact not in the record, and which was prejudicial to the accused.” He submits, however, that while the argument should be condemned, and the trial judge should have instructed the jury to disregard it, nevertheless, that in as much as the fine was only one hundred dollars, no great prejudice was shown.

We agree with the statement as to the nature of the argument, and the duty *102of the trial judge, 'but we are unable to say that no harm resulted to appellant by reason thereof. Even though the State’s witnesses were police officers, men of responsibility, whose testimony was straightforward and clear-cut, it is not for this Court to say that with a fair presentation the jury would have followed their testimony, contradicted as it was by the several witnesses. Only the jury has a right to determine that.

For the error in the argument, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|California - Los Angeles Basin Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 235   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 257    | 295    | 265    | 255    | 233    | 152    | 95     | 154    | 170    | 163   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 116    | 157    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
|  | Mark D. FischerExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Phone:  (212) 381-3509Fax:  (212) 381-3993Email: markfischer@pvh.com |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 2, 2010  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Mintz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/David Mintz*
 David Mintz
 Chief Executive Officer
 Date:  April 2, 2010
 
 *           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

| 99.1 | Press Release, dated November 4, 2013 |
|------|---------------------------------------|

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | By:  /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                            |
|   | Mark D. FischerExecutive Vice President                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |

----

| 99.1 | Press Release, dated November 4, 2013 |
|------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -1    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -2     | -1     | -2     | -3     | -2     | -8     | 1      | 28     | 8      | -9    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 30     | -21    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leslie Gayle, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for an adjournment to substitute retained counsel for his assigned counsel. Defendant’s request was made on the eve of trial after jurors had already been summoned for the selection process. The court, in response to defendant’s motion, stated that it was unwilling to allow defendant to delay the proceeding, but would allow the substitution of retained counsel if he was ready to proceed. The court further found that defendant’s request was merely a delaying tactic. The determination whether to change counsel is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and in making its determination the trial court may consider the interest of judicial economy and the integrity of the criminal process *(see, People v Tineo,*64 NY2d 531, 536-537). Given the lateness of defendant’s request and the trial court’s conclusion that the request was a delaying tactic, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion *(see, People v Branch,*155 AD2d 473, 474, *lv denied*75 NY2d 867).

After the court denied his request for an adjournment, defendant elected to proceed *pro se.*On appeal, he contends that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry before allowing him to proceed *pro se.*Before a court allows a defendant to proceed *pro se,*it must determine that the decision is knowing and intelligent *(see, People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10, 17). In order to make this determination, the court *928must undertake a searching inquiry to be assured that defendant understands the value of counsel and the dangers associated with his giving up his fundamental right to counsel *(see, People v Kaltenbach,*60 NY2d 797, 799). From our review of the record, we conclude that the trial court conducted a sufficient searching inquiry before permitting defendant to proceed *pro se (see, People v Vivenzio,*62 NY2d 775, 776).

Defendant further contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because the 9Vi-month preindictment delay denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Balancing the factors to be considered on a motion to dismiss an indictment for a violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial *(see, People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442, 445), we conclude that the motion was properly denied.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, Dadd, J.—promoting prison contraband, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.