alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

Table of
subsidiaries of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. (Shamir)

|Name                                 | Jurisdiction | Active/ Not active
|------------------------------------ | ------------ | ------------------
|
|
|Eyal Optical Industries (95) Ltd.    | Israel       | Active            
|                                    
|Eyal Optics Holdings A.C.S. Ltd.     | Israel       | Not active        
|                                    
|E. S. P. Optics Ltd.                 | Israel       | Not active        
|                                    
|Aspect Optics Ltd                    | Israel       | Not active        
|                                    
|Shamir Special Optical Products Ltd. | Israel       | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Israel Optical Marketing Ltd. | Israel       | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir USA                           | USA          | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Insight, Inc.                 | USA          | Active            
|                                    
|Altra Trading GmbH                   | Germany      | Active            
|                                    
|Inray Ltd.                           | Israel       | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Or Ltd.                       | Israel       | Active            
|                                    
|Interoptic S.A.R.L.                  | France       | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir France S.A.R.L.               | France       | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Optical Espana S.L.           | Spain        | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Portugal LDA                  | Portugal     | Active            
|                                    
|Shamir Uk Limited                    | UK           | Active            
|                                    
|Cambridge Optical Group Limited      | UK           | Not active        
|                                    
|Altra Optik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.   | Turkey       | Active            
|                                    
|Centro Integral Optico S.A. de C.V.  | Mexico       | Active            
|                                    
|Shalens S.A. de C.V.                 | Mexico       | Active            
|                                    
|Spherical Optics (Pty) Ltd.          | South Africa | Active            



---

---
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 152   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 76     | 129    | 451    | 392    | 196    | 810    | 450    | 0      | 24     | 8     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 568    | 21     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

p1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139633

IN RE WILLIAM J. ALT, M.D., Respondent-Appellant,

v SC: 139633 COA: 293046 Bd of Med: 2006-000326

BUREAU OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Petitioner-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 30, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**2008 -** **2013 HCFC -** **22 Aggregate Inventory Data**

March 27, 2014 Amount of virgin and reclaimed HCFC - 22 owned and held in inventory (as of December 31 of each ye ar) in metric tons (MT), as reported by nine entities in the HCFC - 22 market. **Aggregate HCFC -** **22 Inventory (MT)**  2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 **58,464 62,120**  **63,143 61,968**  **51,124 53,925**  EPA requested HCFC - 22 inventory data from 2008 - 2012 in August 2013. In February 2014, EPA asked the same nine entities for their HCFC - 22 inventory at the end of 2013. Both of these requests were under the authority

of section 114 of the Clean Air Act. The nine entities comprise major producers, importers, distributors and reclaimers of HCFC - 22.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 11, 2009 /s/Dominick Pope     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 5.1
 
 
 PVH CORP.
 
 200 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10016-3903  (212) 381-3500
 
 MARK D. FISCHER

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL

AND SECRETARY
DID:  (212) 381-3509

FAX:  (212) 381-3970

E-mail:  markfischer@pvh.com
  
  June 30, 2011
 
 
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 100 F Street, NE
 Washington, DC 20549
  Gentlemen:
  I refer to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “Registration Statement”) filed on even date by PVH Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of up to an aggregate of 15,648 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”), to be issued in connection with the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).
  I have made such examination as I have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.  Based upon such examination, it is my opinion, that, when the Registration Statement has become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and when the shares of Common Stock to be issued are sold and paid for in the manner described in the Plan, the Common Stock so issued will have been validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
  My opinion is limited to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.  This opinion is given as of the date hereof and I assume no obligation to advise you of changes that may hereafter be brought to my attention.
  I hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.
  Very truly yours,
 
 /s/ Mark D. Fischer
 
 Mark D. Fischer
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2005,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Signet International                Holdings, Inc. |

| Date:                January 16, 2007                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                             |
| **SIGNET                INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.**                                                           |
|                                                                                                             |
| By:                /s/                Ernest W. Letiziano                                                        |
| Ernest                W. LetizianoChief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4459 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thidiazuron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thidiazuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIDIAZURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-phenyl-N′-(1,2,3- 

thiadiazol-5′yl)-urea 

(Thidiazuron) (CAS No. 

51707–55–2) (provided for 

in subheading 3808.93.15) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4459 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### TATUM v. STATE.

No. 26571.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1953.

John H. Banks, Kermit, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder Pat Coffee; the punishment eight years in the penitentiary.

The evidence, including the confession of appellant and his testimony on the trial, shows without dispute that appellant, without legal justification or excuse, cut and stabbed Willie Mae Deams, the woman with whom he had been living, with a long knife or bayonet; then attacked the prosecuting witness Pat Coffee, her male companion.

The attacks occurred in a cafe in Kermit, and both the woman and the prosecuting witness were taken to a hospital in Kermit where they were examined by Dr. Joe Heath.

The sole question presented by appellant in his brief is whether or not the testimony of Dr. Heath, the physician, as to the nature and extent of the injuries inflicted upon Willie Mae Deams by appellant was admissible.

The wounds inflicted upon both parties were of a similar nature and were inflicted by appellant with the same instrument and on the same occasion. However, it appears that the wounds inflicted upon the woman were deeper and were much more serious than the wounds received 'by Pat Coffee.

The evidence showed that the knife or bayonet had a blade some ten inches in length and was therefore a deadly weapon. However, the appellant-testified that he had no intent to kill either Willie Mae Deams or Pat Coffee.

The extent, nature and seriousness of the wounds inflicted upon the woman as well as upon the injured party was relevant upon the question of appellant’s condition of mind and his intent. The testimony of Dr. Heath as to the; injuries sustained by Willie Mae Deams was therefore admis*724sible upon the question of whether appellant intended to kill Pat Coffee, and whether he acted with malice.

The testimony was so limited by the trial judge in his charge, to which no objections were made.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Divestitures (Million Barrels)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 37     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 48     | 7      | 24     | 38     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
| **NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details) - shares shares in Millions**           | Jan. 29, 2017 | Jan. 31, 2016 | Feb. 01, 2015 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]** |          |          |          |
| Number Of Dilutive Shares That Could Be Issued Upon Vesting                               | 0.3           | 0.9           | 0.9           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_NumberOfDilutiveSharesIssuedUponVesting**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3260 

ROSS MILLIGAN, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

 Respondent. 

David Schlachter, Law Offices of David Schlachter, of Uniondale, New York, 

argued for petitioner. 

Jane W. Vanneman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With 

her on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant 

Director, and Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Trial Attorney. 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-3260 

ROSS MILLIGAN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

 Respondent. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in CASE NO(S). NY0752060016-B-1 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (GAJARSA, PLAGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED May 8, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S
O F T E X A S

NOS. WR-90, 448-01 & WR-90, 448-02

EX P ART E GEORGE M I CHAE L B ARGAS JR., Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR WRI TS O F HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NOS. 1045924-A & 1045925-A I N THE 177TH DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM HARRI S COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f t wo o f

f en s es o f aggrav at ed s ex

ual as s aul t o f a ch i l d an d s en

t en ced

t o i m pri s o n m en t

. T h e F o urt een

t h Co urt o f A

ppeal s af f i rm ed h i s co n

v i ct i o n s

. B ar

gas v. State

, 252

S. W

. 3d 876 (T ex

. A

pp—Ho us t o n [14t h Di s t

. ] 2008). A ppl i can t f i l ed t h es e appl i cat i o n s f

o r wri t s o f

h ab eas co rpus i

n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n , an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o rwarded t h em t o t h i s Co urt

. See

T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds

, inter alia

, t h at appell at e co uns e l f ai l ed t o t i m el y i n f o rm h i m t h at h i s

co n v i ct i o n s h a d b een af

f i rm ed b y t h e appel l at e co urt an d t h at h e h ad a ri gh t t o s eek di s cret i o n ary

rev i ew i n t h i s Co urt

. Ba s ed o n t h e reco rd, t h e t ri al co urt h as det erm i n ed t h at appel l at e co un s el ’ s

p erf o rm an ce was def

i ci en t an d t h at A

ppl i can t wo ul d h av e t i

m el y f i l ed a pet i t i o n f o r di s c r e t i o na r y2

rev i ew b ut f

o r co un s el ’ s def

i ci en t perf o rm an ce. Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. E x par te W ilson

, 956 S. W

. 2d 25

(T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 1997); E

x parte Cr ow , 180 S. W

. 3d 135 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2005).

A ppl i can t m ay f i l e o u t -o f -t i m e pet i t i o n s f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f t h e j udgm en t s o f t h e

F o urt een t h Co urt o f Ap p eal s i

n caus e n um b ers 14-06- 00795-CR an d 14-06- 00797-CR. Sh o ul d

A ppl i can t deci de t o f

i l e pet i t i o n s f o r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew, h e m us t f i l e t h em wi

t h t h i s Co urt wi

t h i n

t h i rt y day s f ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e. A n y o t h er c l ai

m s are di s m

i s s ed. E x parte T or r es ,

943 S. W

. 2d 469, 474 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 1997).

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: Oct o b er 21, 2020

Do n o t pub l i s h
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Periodic Report  Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to the undersigneds knowledge: (1)
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Dated:
November 13, 2009/s/ Jeff WatsonName:
Jeff WatsonTitle:
Chief Financial
Officer