alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CONNERS MARINE CO., Appellant, v. MANHATTAN LIGHTERAGE CO., Appellee. AMERICAN MOLASSES CO., Appellee, v. THE SEATRAIN HAVANA, Seatrain Lines, Inc., Appellee, Conners Marine Co., Inc., Appellant.

No. 457.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 6, 1937.

Thomas A. McDonald, of New York City, for appellant.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper and John L. Galey, all of New York City, for Manhattan Lighterage Co.

Kirlin, Campbell, Iiickox, Keating & McGrann and Edwin Sere Murphy, all oi New York City, for the Seatrain Havana and Seatrain Lines, Inc.

Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, of New York City, for American Molasses Co.

*1012Before L. HAND, AUGUSTOS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (16 F.Supp. 22), affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION


I, Barry Muradian, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Image Technology
Laboratories, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

   (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

   (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting;


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and


    (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls.




/S/ BARRY C. MURADIAN
-----------------------
BARRY C. MURADIAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
NOVEMBER 15, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Equity Trust, Inc, (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Date:  March 31, 2006

                                               /s/ Oliver T. Carr, III
                                       -------------------------------------
                                                Oliver T. Carr, III
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


     Date:  March 31, 2006

                                              /s/ John A. Schissel
                                       -------------------------------------
                                                John A. Schissel
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROBERTA CABANAZ STALEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50147

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00609-GAF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Roberta Cabanaz Staley appeals from her guilty-plea conviction for health

care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347, for which she was sentenced to three

years of probation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Staley’s

FILED

FEB 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-50147

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
H. R. 2192 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the meanstest presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National Guard who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense 

activity for not less than 90 days. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and Reservist 

Debt Relief Extension Act of 2011’’. 

SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF AMENDMENT. 

Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief 

Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–438; 122 Stat. 5000) is amended 

by striking ‘‘3-year’’ and inserting ‘‘7-year’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit3.37**

**STATE OF DELAWARE**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OFCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

The undersignedVice President and Assistant Secretary of Birch Creek Funding Corporation, acorporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General CorporationLaw of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”) does hereby certify:

**FIRST:**             Thatat a meeting of the Corporation’s Board of Directors resolutions were dulyadopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Corporation’s Certificate ofIncorporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meetingof the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposedamendment is as follows:

**RESOLVED**, that the Certificateof Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the Article thereofnumbered 1 so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

1.                                       Thename of the corporation is:

**Boise White Paper Sales Corp.**

**SECOND**:          Thatthereafter, pursuant to the resolution of its Board of Directors, saidamendment was duly adopted by a consent in lieu of meeting signed on December12, 2006 by the Corporation’s sole shareholder in accordance with therequirements of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State ofDelaware and that such action satisfies the requirements of Section 242 of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware respecting amendment of theCorporation’s certificate of Incorporation.

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has caused this certificateto be signed this 12th day of December, 2006.

 
|   | /s/ David G. Gadda                     |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David G. Gadda                         |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary |

 

----

 
| STATE OF IDAHO | )     |
|----------------|-------|
|           | ) ss. |
| COUNTY OF ADA  | )     |

 

On this 12th day ofDecember 2006, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for saidstate, personally appeared David G. Gadda, known to me to be the Vice President and Secretary of Birch CreekCorporation, a Delaware corporation, that executed the above instrument onbehalf of said corporation and acknowledged to me that said corporationexecuted the same.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand andaffixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first abovewritten.
|          |   | /s/  Cherie H. Anderson        |   |
|---------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|          |   | Notary Public for Idaho        |
|          |   | Residing at Boise              |
| (Notary Seal) |   | My Commission expires 08/05/09 |

 

----
|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History:                                          
|                                                       
|Utah Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       
|                                                       
|Utah Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         | 489,947 | 526,290 | 440,712 | 411,399 | 379,487 | 323,546 | 277,350 | 254,508 | 235,966
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 196,463 | 193,874 | 216,064 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE IASIA
WORKS, INCFORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
THIS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          94,389
<SECURITIES>                                    13,477
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                       905
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,884
<PP&E>                                          38,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,506
<SALES>                                          7,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,995
<CGS>                                            7,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00123

- CR

S IR J ASON D OUGLAS R OBINSON

, J R

. , Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District

Court

of Denton County ( F22

- 184

- 211 )

May 9, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opi nion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CU RIAM
### :)r?ApTMENTO F UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N " ?P T (WRAT^W ^ FEDERALAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N '' " '^'^ ^ 

### ^0: 0 AUG? 3 P 2'2 U I n th e Matte r

of : Federa l Expres s Corporatio n FA A Docke t No . CP10SW000 7 FA A Cas e No . 2009SW70027 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n ' " ' ^"^^' ' * ' -'^'t»«.* ' AFFIDAVI T O FKARE N KORBO L' ^ ~ * ^"' ^ COME S NO Wth e affiant , Kare n Korbol , an dswear s t o th e following : • ' ' ' '^'-" ^ '----' v s.-,

_, 1 . M y nam e i s Kare n Korbol . 2 . I ama n employe e o f FedE x Express . 3 . I amcurrentl y o n leav e fro mmy employmen t for an injur y unrelate dt o th e issue s o f thi s case . 4 . I wa s workin g o n Thursday , Jul y 9 , 200 9 whe n th e shipmen t at issu e i n thi s cas e wa s brough t

i n b y acustomer . 5 . A t th e reques t

o f FedEx , I wrot e th e attache dstatement , whic hi s atru e an d accurat e statemen t

o f wha t occurre do n tha t

date . 6 . T o clarif

y my statement , I neve r

sa w abattery o r

an y item s inside th e bo x bein g shipped . I simpl y tape dth e bo x shu t for th e customer . 7 . T o clarif

y my statement , th e custome r mentione dth e wor d"battery " i n som e context , bu t

I believed , basedo n my brie f interactio n wit hth e shipper , tha t sh e wa s talkin g abou t

abattery charger , no t

abattery . 8 . I f I ha dthough t

th e custome r

wa s shippin g abattery , I woul dhavelSai y *' ^ askedadditiona l questions , sinc e my trainin g ha s taugh t m e tha t som e batterie s ar e regulated . 9 . Whe n I said , i n m y attache dstatement , tha t "yo u coul dalmos t

bu y ane w on e for th e pric e o f

th e shipping, " I mean t

tha t th e custome r

coul dalmos t

bu y a ne w batter y rathe r

tha n payin g t o hav e abatter y charge r shipped . 10 . Whe n I said , i n my attache dstatement , tha t " I jus t wasn' t payin g clos e enoug h attention, " I mean t

that , i n retrospect , I wis hI ha dsee n th e batter y o r\ understoo dtha t th e custome r

was shippin g abattery , but I stil l believ e that , base do n th e conversatio n I ha dwit hth e customer , th e custome r conveye d tha t sh e wa s shippin g abatter y charger . 11 . Th e informatio n containe di n thi s Affidavi t i s th e sam e informatio n tha t I believ e I conveye dt o th e FA A Agen t whe n bein g interviewe db y him . FURTHE RAFFIAN T SAYET H NOT . REN K Stat e o f ^/SCO^S , / ^ Count y o f

Sj-t^.^ns J <

5 />n ^ Personall y appeare dbefor e m e thi s th e T day o f AcJL O u^f~ , 201 0 KARE N KORBOL , eithe r know n b y m e o r

prove n t o areasonabl e certainty , an d execute dth e foregoin g instrumen t an dacknowledge dtha t

sh e execute dth e sam e a s he r fre e ac t an ddeed . WITNES S M Y HAN D an dseal o n th e day an ddat e writte n above . M y commissio n expires : ' ^ '/'I'/ / ^^^--^j^^^^e^i^^?./ : /

- <^6f^K.aC4-v.- j
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1050

United States of America, for the use and

benefit of J. BOBBY CURRIN & SONS, a North

Carolina General Partnership,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

J & W BUILDERS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-95-533-2)

Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

George K. Freeman, Jr., ROUNTREE & SEAGLE, L.L.P., Wilmington,

North Carolina; Benjamin N. Thompson, THOMPSON & GODWIN, L.L.P.,

Dunn, North Carolina, for Appellant. C. Hamilton Jarrett, ELLZEY

& BROOKS, L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; James Lynn Werner,

Cheryl L. Behymer, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

J. Bobby Currin & Sons (“Currin”) appeals the district court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of Hartford Accident and

Indemnity Company (“Hartford”), in this action filed under the

Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a to 270d (West 1986 & Supp. 1998).

Currin sought payment in excess of $310,000 under the payment bond

issued by Hartford, as surety, for the work Currin did as a subcontractor on a government project. Hartford asserted in its motion

for summary judgment that Currin’s claim was barred by the one-year

statute of limitations. See 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b. Currin responded

that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precluded Hartford from

raising the limitations defense. The district court granted summary

judgment in Hartford’s favor and dismissed Currin’s action as untimely filed, relying on United States ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 402 F.2d 893,

898 (4th Cir. 1968).

We have carefully examined the record, the briefs, and the

opinion of the district court. We agree with the district court

that Currin failed to satisfy the requirements of equitable

estoppel and, therefore, affirm the grant of summary judgment on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States ex rel. J.

Bobby Currin & Sons v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., No. CA-95-

533-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
4

based on our prior order granting the unopposed motion to submit

the case on briefs.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Liankuan YangName: Liankuan YangTitle: Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer  Dated: May 20, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.