57542 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 186 / Monday, September 25, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

Compliance With Executive Orders

13132, 12988 and 12866, the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),

and the Paperwork Reduction Act (44

U.S.C. Chapter 3501 et seq.)

This rule is not a ‘‘significant’’

regulatory action under Executive Order

12866.

SBA has determined that this final

rule will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities within the

meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The rule is

procedural and merely changes the title

of the individual to whom interested

parties must serve certain

administrative litigation pleadings.

For the purpose of the Paperwork

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35, SBA

certifies that this rule would not impose

new reporting or record keeping

requirements.

For purposes of Executive Order

13132, SBA certifies that this rule does

not have any federalism implications

warranting the preparation of a

Federalism Assessment.

For purposes of Executive Order

12988, SBA certifies that this rule is

drafted, to the extent practicable, in

accordance with the standards set forth

in section 3 of this order.

List of Subjects

13 CFR Part 124

Government procurement, Hawaiian

Natives, Minority businesses, Reporting

and record keeping requirements;

Technical Assistance, Tribally-owned

concerns.

13 CFR Part 134

Administrative practice and

procedure, Organization and functions

(Government agencies).

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth

above, SBA amends Title 13, Code of

Federal Regulations (CFR), as follows:

PART 124—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 13 CFR

part 124 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), 636(j),

637(a), 637(d) and Pub. L. 99–661, Pub. L.

100–656, sec. 1207, Pub. L. 101-37, Pub. L.

101–574, and 42 U.S.C. 9815.

2. Section 124.1008 is amended by

revising paragraph (f)(4)(i) to read as

follows:

§ 124.1008 How does a firm become

certified as an SDB?

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(4) * * *

(i) The firm must serve SBA’s

Associate General Counsel for

Procurement Law with a copy of the

appeal.

* * * * *

3. Section 124.1009 is amended by

revising the introductory paragraph to

read as follows:

§ 124.1009 How does a firm appeal a

decision of a Private Certifier?

Where a Private Certifier performs an

ownership and control determination

and finds that a firm is not owned and

controlled by the individual(s) claiming

disadvantaged status, the firm may

appeal that decision to OHA pursuant to

part 134 of this title. The firm must

serve SBA’s Associate General Counsel

for Procurement Law and the applicable

Private Certifier with a copy of the

appeal.

* * * * *

PART 134—[AMENDED]

4. The authority citation for 13 CFR

part 134 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632,

634(b)(6), and 637(a).

5. Section 134.305 is amended by

revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as

follows:

§ 134.305 The appeal petition.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(5) SBA’s Office of Procurement Law.

6. Section 134.403 is amended by

revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as

follows:

§ 134.403 Service of appeal petition.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(1) For appeals relating to denials of

program admission pursuant to

§ 124.206 of this title, suspensions of

program assistance pursuant to

§ 124.305, or denials of requests for

waivers pursuant to § 124.515, a

petitioner must serve the SBA’s

Associate General Counsel for

Procurement Law.

* * * * *

Dated: August 23, 2000.

Fred P. Hochberg,

Acting Administrator.

[FR Doc. 00–23482 Filed 9–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–ASO–39]

Removal of Class E Airspace;

Simmons Army Airfield (AAF), NC.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action removes the Class

E4 Airspace at Simmons AAF, NC, as

there is no longer a Standard Instrument

Approach Procedure (SIAP) for

Simmons AAF requiring an extension to

the Class D surface area airspace.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, November

30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy B. Shelton, Manager, Airspace

Branch, Air Traffic Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;

telephone (404) 305–5586.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

A review of the controlled airspace for

Simmons AAF revealed the existence of

an extension to the Class D surface area

airspace, although there was no longer

a SIAP requiring such an extension.

Therefore, the Class E4 airspace area

must be removed. This rule will become

effective on the date specified in the

‘‘DATE’’ section. Since this action

eliminates the impact of controlled

airspace on users of the airspace in the

vicinity of the Simmons AAF, notice

and public procedure under 5 U.S.C.

553(b) are unnecessary. Designations for

Class E airspace areas designated as an

extension to Class D airspace area are

published in FAA Order 7400.9H, dated

September 1, 2000, and effective

September 16, 2000, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

part 71.1. The Class E designation listed

in this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to Part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) removes Class E4 airspace at

Simmons AAF, NC.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 186 / Monday, September 25, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 57543

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by Reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,

40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9H,

Airspace Designations and Reporting

Points, dated September 1, 2000, and

effective September 16, 2000, is

amended as follows:

Paragraph 6004 Class E4 Airspace Areas

Designated as an Extension to Class D

Airspace Area.

* * * * *

ASO NC E4 Simmons AAF, NC [Removed]

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on

September 15, 2000.

Wade T. Carpenter,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 00–24491 Filed 9–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–ACE–19]

Amendment to Class E Airspace;

Atwood, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of

effective date.

SUMMARY: This document confirms the

effective date of a direct final rule which

revises Class E airspace at Atwood, KS.

DATES: The direct final rule published at

65 FR 43684 is effective on 0901 UTC,

November 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division,

Airspace Branch, ACE–520C, DOT

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,

Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:

(816) 329–2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FAA published this direct final

rule with a request for comments in the

Federal Register on July 14, 2000 (65 FR

43684). The FAA uses the direct final

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA

believes that there will be no adverse

public comment. This direct final rule

advised the public that no adverse

comments were anticipated, and that

unless a written adverse comment, or a

written notice of intent to submit such

an adverse comment, were received

within the comment period, the

regulation would become effective on

November 30, 2000. No adverse

comments were received, and thus this

notice confirms that this direct final rule

will become effective on that date.

Issued in Kansas City, MO on September

12, 2000.

Richard L. Day,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central

Region.

[FR Doc. 00–24489 Filed 9–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–ACE–20]

Amendment to Class E Airspace;

Oakley, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of

effective date.

SUMMARY: This document confirms the

effective date of a direct final rule which

revises Class E airspace at Oakley, KS.

DATES: The direct final rule published at

65 FR 43683 is effective on 0901 UTC,

November 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division,

Airspace Branch ACE–520C, DOT

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,

Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:

(816) 329–2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FAA published this direct final

rule with a request for comments in the

Federal Register on July 14, 2000 (65 FR

43683). The FAA uses the direct final

rulemaking procedure for noncontroversial rule where the FAA

believes that there will be no adverse

public comment. This direct final rule

advised the public that no adverse

comments were anticipated, and that

unless a written adverse comment, or a

written notice of intent to submit such

an adverse comment, were received

within the comment period, the

regulation would become effective on

November 30, 2000. No adverse

comments were received, and thus this

notice confirms that this direct final rule

will become effective on that date.

Issued in Kansas City, MO on September

12, 2000.

Richard L. Day,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central

Region.

[FR Doc. 00–24488 Filed 9–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–AAL–4]

Revision of Class E Airspace; Ambler,

AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action revises Class E

airspace at Ambler, AK. The

establishment of a Global Positioning

System (GPS) instrument approach

procedure to runway (RWY) 36 at

Ambler, AK, made this action necessary.

This rule provides adequate controlled

airspace for aircraft flying Instrument

Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Ambler,

AK.