alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|Texas - RRC District 4 Onshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Million Barrels)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                Certification required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      (as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Shevach Saraf, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of Solitron Devices, Inc., (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
          the quarterly period ended August 31, 2003 (the "Report"), filed with
          the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  October 20, 2003                        /s/ Shevach Saraf
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Shevach Saraf
                                               Chairman, President,
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Treasurer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing by AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jack J. Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: June 25, 2010
By:
/s/ Jack J. WalkerJack J. WalkerChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
June 1, 2015 

Mr. Blaine Jonathan 

Advanced Photography Specialists 

9703 Oxford Street 

Naples, FL 34109 

Dear Mr. Jonathan: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 29, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1338), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
_____________ No. 96-1670NE

_____________ Millard Processing Services, a * Nebraska corporation, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Tetra Laval Convenience Food, * Inc., formerly known as TW * [UNPUBLISHED] Kutter, Inc., doing business as * TW Kutter, doing business as TW * Kutter/Koppens, * *

Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: October 23, 1996 Filed: October 30, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Mil lard Processing Services appeals an adverse grant of summar y judgment in this diversity action. Having reviewed de novo the grant of summaryjudgment, we find no error by the district court. Because a n extend ed opinion would lack precedential value, we affirm the distric t court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         398,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,050,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,871
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,050,049
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,342,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,342,005)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 28, 2007, accompanying the December 31, 2006 consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Omega Flex, Inc and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 in this Registration Statement of Omega Flex, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (333-135515).

 

VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 29, 2007
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JOEL PAUL BACH §

§

Plaintiff

- Appellant

, §

§

v. § Case No. 03

- 14

- 00395

- CV

§

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, §

§

Defendant

- Appellee

. §

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW

UNOPPOSED MOTION F OR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS :

NOW COMES Appellant Joe l Paul Bach by and through undersigned counsel,

hereby move s to withdraw his Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time to File

Appellant’s Brief

, filed in error on January 12, 2015 at 5:19 p.m.

1. T he opinion in this appeal was issued on 12/17/14.

2. Appellant’s counsel has conferred with counsel for the other parties, none

of whom oppose the relief requested herein.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully request an

Order withdrawing the unopposed motion.

Respectfully submitted,

David K. Sergi & Associates, P.C.

By: / s/ David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi

State Bar No. 18036000

329 S. Guadalupe Street

San Marcos, Texas 78666

Telephone: (512) 392

- 5010 ACCEPTED

03-14-00395-CV

3744048

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/13/2015 10:05:04 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 Facsimile: (512) 392

- 5042

E

- Mail: david@sergilaw.com

Attorney for Joel Paul Bach

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

This is to certify that I, David K. Sergi, conferred with Appellee’s counsel, Erika

M. Kane, via e

- mail regardin g the substance of this motion, and that Appellee’s counsel

is un opposed.

/s/ David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi

CERTIFICATE OF SERV ICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing documen t has been

sent via ECF/CM , on January 1 3 , 2015 to:

Erika M. Kane

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711

- 2548

Erika.kane@texasattorneygeneral.gov

/s/ David K. Sergi

David K. Sergi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHONEY'S, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 11, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-11-1997
<CASH>                                      10,963,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,964,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,617,247
<INVENTORY>                                 46,501,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           158,142,066
<PP&E>                                     813,173,725
<DEPRECIATION>                             324,553,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             712,167,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      256,888,475
<BONDS>                                    417,124,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    48,568,109
<OTHER-SE>                                 (56,086,480)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               712,167,686
<SALES>                                    646,191,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           658,699,044
<CGS>                                      586,559,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              672,006,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            60,879,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          24,567,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13,307,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (4,831,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,476,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,476,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4601 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4601

To extend the suspension of duty on Isobutyl 4-hydroxybenzoate and its 
                              sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2012

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the suspension of duty on Isobutyl 4-hydroxybenzoate and its 
                              sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ISOBUTYL 4-HYDROXYBENZOATE AND ITS SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.41 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Isobutyl 4-hydroxybenzoate 
and its sodium salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251] 

                    On September 11, 2000, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission received, by letter dated September 8, 2000, an application from Florida Power and Light Company, filed pursuant to section 104(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10 CFR part 54, for renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41, which authorizes the applicant to operate Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 for an additional 20-year period. The current operating licenses for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 expire on July 19, 2012 and April 10, 2013, respectively. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 are pressurized-water reactors designed by Westinghouse and are located in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The acceptability of the tendered application for docketing and other matters, including an opportunity to request a hearing, will be the subject of a subsequent                     **Federal Register**                     notice.                 

A copy of the application is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov, (the Electronic Reading Room). 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of September 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Christopher I. Grimes, 

Chief, License Renewal and Standardization Branch, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 00-24664 Filed 9-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ J. Eric Pike

J. Eric PikeChief Executive OfficerSeptember 6, 2011/s/ Anthony K. Slater

Anthony K. SlaterChief Financial OfficerSeptember 6, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 99-ASW-26]


Revision of Class E Airspace; El Paso, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at El Paso, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 64 FR 58332 is 
effective 0901 UTC, February 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 29, 
1999, (64 FR 58332). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on February 24, 2000. No adverse 
comments were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this 
direct final rule will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on December 27, 1999.
JoEllen Casilio,
Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 00-244 Filed 1-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 8.1
SUBSIDIARIES* OF THE REGISTRANT
 1.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology (Beijing) Limited, a PRC company2.
    
    One Net Entertainment Limited, a PRC company3.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology (Shanghai) Limited, a PRC company4.
    
    STEP Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a PRC company5.
    
    Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Beijing) Limited, a PRC company6.
    
    Techfaith Software (China) Limited, a PRC company7.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology (Hangzhou) Limited, a PRC company8.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology (Shenyang) Limited, a PRC company9.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology (Shenzhen) Limited, a PRC company10.
    
    Techfaith Intelligent Handset Technology (Hong Kong) Limited, registered in Hong Kong11.
    
    Techfaith Wireless Technology Group Limited, a BVI company12.
    
    798 Entertainment Limited, a BVI company13.
    
    QIGI&BODEE Technology Limited, a Hong Kong company14.
    
    QIGI&BODEE International Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.15.
    
    QIGI&BODEE Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.16.
    
    Glomate Mobile (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
 *
    
    Insignificant subsidiaries are omitted.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 27, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 27, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A14A2249. CINDY NGUYEN D/B/A PHO VY v. MARTIN FLOURNOY.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.