alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1998 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1998

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit the District 
of Columbia to impose a tax on income earned as a professional athlete 
                    by nonresidents of the District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2011

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit the District 
of Columbia to impose a tax on income earned as a professional athlete 
                    by nonresidents of the District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING TAXATION OF NONRESIDENT PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE 
              INCOME BY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Permitting District To Impose Tax.--Section 602(a)(5) of the 
District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-206.02(a)(5), D.C. Official 
Code) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the 
following: ``, other than any income earned by the individual as a 
professional athlete;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to income earned on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2213 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2213

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 801 West Eastport Street in Iuka, Mississippi, as the ``Sergeant 
                     Jason W. Vaughn Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2011

Mr. Nunnelee (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Harper, and 
 Mr. Palazzo) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 801 West Eastport Street in Iuka, Mississippi, as the ``Sergeant 
                     Jason W. Vaughn Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JASON W. VAUGHN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 801 West Eastport Street in Iuka, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Jason W. Vaughn Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jason W. Vaughn Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
### NU M B ER 13

- 12

- 0 0 693

- CV



## CO U RT O F A P P E A LS

THIRT E EN T H D IS T RICT O F T E X A S

CO R P U S C H RISTI

- EDI NB URG

B A RR Y D W A

Y N E MI NNF E E , A p p e ll a n t ,

v.

KRYSTAL DAVIS, ET AL. , A p p e ll ees.

On a pp eal f r o m t h e 130th D i s t ri c t C ou r t

o f M a ta go r d a Coun t y , T exas



## MEMO R A N DUM O PINI O N

B ef o r e Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes M em or a ndu m O pin i o n Per Cu r i am

A ppe l la n t, B a r r y W a y n e M in n f ee , a t t e m p t e d t o pe r f e ct a n a pp e a l from an order

issued by the trial court

. Up o n re v iew o f t h e do c u m e n ts be f o re t h e Co u r t , it app e a red

t ha t t h e o r d e r h e w a s a t t e mp ti n g t o ap p ea l w a s no t a pp e a la b le and the appeal was late.

T h e C l e rk o f t h is Co u rt no t i f i e d ap p e l l an t o f t hese de f e cts so t ha t st e p s c o u ld b e

t a k e n to c o r r e ct t h e d e f e c ts, i f it c ou ld b e do ne

. S e e T E X

. R. A PP

. P

. 37

. 1

, 4 2

. 3

.2

A p pe l l an t w a s ad v ised t ha t, i f t h e de f e c t s w e re no t c o r r e ct e d w it h i n t e n d a y s f rom t h e

d a te o f re c e ipt o f t h i s no tic e , t h e a p p ea l w ou ld b e d i s m issed f o r w an t o f jur i s d ictio n

.

A ppe l la n t ha s failed to respond to this Court’s directive and has not shown that the order

at issue is subject to appeal or that the appeal is timely.

Moreover, appellant is on the list of vexatious litigants compiled by the Office of

the Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System, and he has been prohibited

from filing any more litigation in Texas courts without permission of a local

administrative judge. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 11.104 (West Supp.

2011); see generally http://www.txcourts.gov/oca/vexatiouslitigants.asp. The record

before the Court fails to show that appellant obtained the permission of the local

administrative judge to file this appeal . With limited exceptions not applicable to this

case, "a clerk of a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other

claim presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101

unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the

filin g." Id. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2011).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to

correct the defects in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.

Accordingly, the appeal is DI SMISSED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),(c).

PER C U RIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th day of February, 2013.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 21, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Liankuan Yang certify that:  1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gold Horse International, Inc.
  2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
  (a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;
  5.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Liankuan Yang Name: Liankuan Yang Title: Chief Executive Officer. principal executive officer  Dated: November 19, 2007
## Docket No. FAA **- 20**  **12 -**  **026 4** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8/30/11 Regional Airline Association 8/30/11 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/30/11

AT A Joe White 8/30/11
2Q

Jack Oakman 100 Singletree Stockbridge, GA 302814858 March 7, 2010
The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Retirees Support Delta's Haneda Application

- Keep the USA a Global Participant
Dear Secretary LaHood: Delta Air Lines has submitted an application to provide new nonstop service from the U.S. to Tokyo's Haneda airport. As a retired employee ofDelta. I enthusiastically support this application. Underthe new aviation agreement with Japan. Haneda will be reopened to U.S. carriers for the 

### final time since 1976. Because ofits convenient location near central Tokyo, Haneda is the preferred airportfor business travelers. Delta employees, and many ofits retirees, have worked for many years to build Delta's business in Japan, and no U.S. airline bas invested more in Tokyo than Delta. Delta has a strong record ofcompetitive trans-Pacific service. Bntthe reopening ofHaneda will put that investment and Deltajobs atrisk ifthey are unable to compete. Delta's major competitors, the Star and oneworld

### Alli~bes,' have Japanese partners that dominate service atHaneda. Delta, which does not have a Japanese partner, would be at a serious disadvantage unless it is given the opportunity to compete at Haneda. IfDelta is provided with the Haneda slots they need, all three ofthe major airline alliances

- SkYTeam, Star and oneworld

- will be able to compete on a level playing field. That new competition would provide tremendous benefits for Delta's customers and Delta's employees. I urge you toapprove Delta's application and provide the**.tr~uencies** proposed to serve.Haneda from**~.attle** ..J)etroit, Los ADgilesandHonolulu. 

# +-foblt-**~l1** Sincerely,

# f)~ JackOaknlan 770-954-0166
#### Ex parte Thomas J. PRESSON.

No. 24350.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1949.

No appearance, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Relator by habeas corpus proceeding sought to defeat extradition to the State of Illinois. After a hearing the district judge remanded him to the custody of the sheriff of Dallas County for delivery to the agent of the demanding state. Relator gave notice of appeal to this court. He now files his affidavit advising us that he now desires to abide by the ruling of the remanding court, and desires to return to the demanding state for the purpose of answering the charge there filed against him, and prays that his appeal be dismissed, which is accordingly so ordered.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2249 

To provide for the treatment of certain hospitals under the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2011 

Mr. MCKINLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment of certain hospitals under the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Competition for 

5 Hospitals Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN HOSPITALS. 

7 (a) TREATMENT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of law, effective for discharges occurring 

10 on or after October 1, 2011, for purposes of making 

11 payments under section 1886(d) of the Social SecuVerDate Mar 15 2010 19:56 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2249.IH H2249

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2249 IH

1 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww) to a hospital described 

2 in paragraph (2), the wage index that applies to 

3 such hospital under such section shall be the highest 

4 wage index assigned to hospitals in the core-based 

5 statistical area in which the hospital is located (re6 gardless of which State the hospital is located in) as 

7 a result of the application of section 4410(a) of the 

8 Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww 

9 note). 

10 (2) HOSPITAL DESCRIBED.—A hospital de11 scribed in this paragraph is a hospital— 

12 (A) that is located in a core-based statis13 tical area which is comprised of counties from 

14 more than 1 State; 

15 (B) that is not located in a core-based sta16 tistical area in which 1 or more hospitals are 

17 subject to the minimum wage index under para18 graph (h)(4) of section 412.64 of title 42, Code 

19 of Federal Regulations; and 

20 (C) that is not located in a core-based sta21 tistical area in which the highest wage index de22 scribed in paragraph (1) applies to hospitals de23 scribed in such paragraph under a State reim24 bursement system under section 1814(b)(3) or 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2249 IH

1 1886(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

2 1395f(b)(3); 1395ww(c)). 

3 (b) RULES.—Any increase in the wage index of a hos4 pital as a result of the application of subsection (a) shall 

5 be treated as the result of a decision of the Medicare Geo6 graphic Classification Review Board under paragraph (10) 

7 of section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395ww(d)) and subject to budget neutrality under para9 graph (8)(D) of such section. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Jessie James HOLLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27368.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1954.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 2, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Conviction is for the sale of whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record contains no notice of appeal, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction, to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate the Appeal

The appeal is now perfected, and the case will be considered on its fnerits.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Alii proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

MADISON GARRAWAY NO. 

### 2022 CW 0818 VERSUS JAMEE RAYE ALLEN AND FORD 

### AUGUST 2. 2022 MOTOR COMPANY
In Re: Hilda Lou Byargeon, 

## in her capacityas the Curatrix of

Madison Garraway, 

## applying for supervisorywrits, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 631668.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator 

### failed to 

### include a 

### copy of 

### the district court's judgment, 

### order or ruling complained of and the pertinent minute 

### entry 

### in violation of Rule 

### 4- 5(C)( 

### 6) and 10) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

Supplementation of this writ application and/or an 

## application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 

### Rules 2- 18. 7 and 4- 9. VGW JMG EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



## ui• DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 10.14

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This FIRST AMENDMENT to the Employment Agreement between Boise Cascade, L.L.C. and W. Thomas Stephens dated October 29, 2004, is made this
6th day of February, 2008.

WHEREAS,
certain changes to the Employment Agreement are necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and

WHEREAS,
the parties wish to make certain other changes.

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:





---









---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date written above.

|Boise Cascade, L.L.C. |  | W. Thomas Stephens                
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|By                    |  | /s/ Karen E. Gowland              
|Its                   |  | Vice President and General Counsel

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31



                                 CERTIFICATION


             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust
             2005-4;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


             Date: March 24, 2006


                                         /s/ Steve Bailey
                                         --------------------
                                         Steve Bailey
                                         Senior Managing Director