alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          7
<CIK>                      0000727892
<NAME>                     IDS Life Insurance Company
<MULTIPLIER>               1000
<CURRENCY>                 U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                       <C>    
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         11146845
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        10236379
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          10521650
<EQUITIES>                                       3308
<MORTGAGE>                                    3493364
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   70290
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               25587955
<CASH>                                         224603
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1803
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        2330805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               47305981
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              25649042
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           83634
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<COMMON>                                         3000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    2144080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 47305981
<PREMIUMS>                                     182921
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           1965362
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (159)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 574341
<BENEFITS>                                    1560678
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    278605
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           261468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                621714
<INCOME-TAX>                                   207138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            414576
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   414576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  24192
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             88549
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              86354
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 26387
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

---

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of American Energy Production, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Charles
Bitters, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to their knowledge:

---

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the
          Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Company.

|November 12 2004 |  | BY: /S/ Charles Bitters 
Charles Bitters Principal Executive Officer,
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|November 12 2004 |  | BY: /S/ Charles Bitters 
Charles Bitters 
Principal Financial Officer
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Energy Production, Inc.
and will be retained by American Energy Production, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2005-A Listing (by filing date) of Form 8-K Filings for fiscal year 2005: 

1. February 7, 2005 

2. February 25, 2005 

3. March 28, 2005 

4. April 5, 2005 

5. April 20, 2005 

6. May 24, 2005 

7. June 23, 2005 

8. July 21, 2005 

9. August 22, 2005 

10. September 26, 2005 

11. October 27, 2005 

12. November 22, 2005 

13. December 16, 2005 

14. January 26, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Celestial Seasonings,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and for
each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1998, and have issued
our report thereon dated November 10, 1998; such consolidated financial
statements and report are included in your 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders
and are included herein. Our audits also included the consolidated financial
statement schedule of the Company, listed in Item 14. This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 10, 1998
#### David JOSEPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27247.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1954.

*690Seipel & Seipel, San Antonio, for appellant.

Austin F. Anderson, Crim. Dist. Atty., J. Lawton Stone, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, Harry J. Burns, Asst. City Atty., San Antonio, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the County Court at Law No. 1 of Bexar County dismissing appellant’s appeal from a conviction in the Corporation Court of the City of Alamo Heights.

The grounds of the dismissal were that the appeal bond was filed too late in the Corporation Court.

From the transcript it appears that the appellant was convicted in the Corporation Court on January *7,*1954, of the offense of negligent collision; a fine of $200 was assessed, and he gave notice of appeal.

Two witnesses testified at the hearing on the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Henckel, Clerk of the Corporation Court, testified that an appeal bond was presented to him on or about January 14 and forwarded by a policeman to the judge on the evening of January 14; that some time thereafter the bond was returned to him disapproved; that he communicated with the office of appellant’s attorney and secured the address of the sureties, inserted such addresses in the face of the bond, and resubmitted the same to the judge; and that the judge finally approved the bond, and he filed the same on January 22. He stated that he did not “consider the bond filed until it was approved.”

Judge McClanahan testified that a bond in appellant’s case was submitted to him some time after appellant’s conviction, that he disapproved the same and returned it to the clerk, that at some time later the same bond or another one was submitted to him, and that he approved it on January 22, overlooking the fact that “it was presented at a date later than required by law, and of no value.”

It therefore remains for us to determine whether the delivery of the bond to the judge constitutes compliance with the statute or whether it is incumbent upon the accused to secure the approval of the bond by the judge within the ten days provided by Article 836, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

We think it readily inferrible from the above that the bond was delivered to the judge in time, that the only defect therein was that the addresses of the sureties were not shown, and that when such addresses were inserted it was approved.

This Court has held that formal approval of an appeal bond by the justice of the peace is not required. Ex parte Wells, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 322, 175 S.W.2d 76, and Taylor v. State, 16 Tex.App. 514.

Article 834, V.A.C.C.P., provides, in part, as follows:

> “In appeals from justice and corporation courts, when the appeal bond provided for in the preceding article has been filed with the justice or judge who tried the case, the appeal in such case shall be held to be perfected.”

Under the facts of this case, we are inclined to conclude that the county court at law fell into error when he dismissed the appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### DORRILL v. STATE.

No. 26792.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated March 3, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System and
Subsidiaries (the Company) included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 33-10769, 33-15322, 33-18696, 33-64582 and 33-86072, effective
December 12, 1986, June 25, 1987, December 1, 1987, June 17, 1993 and November
8, 1994, respectively) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-33780, effective March 9,
1990).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Jose, California
March 3, 1997
| | EXHIBIT 99.2
| | ------------



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended February
1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emanuel Chirico, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: April 7, 2004

By:  /s/  Emanuel Chirico

Name:	Emanuel Chirico

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION



I, Brett White, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Corio, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
6. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
7. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
8. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
9. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
10. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

|Date: August 13, 2004 | /s/ Brett White
|--------------------- | ---------------
|                      |                

---
1

 The order dated April 14, 2005, is withdrawn and counsel’s motion to withdraw from the

appeal is dismissed.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00083-CR

Lawrence Jones, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3020807, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.1

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 28, 2005

Do Not Publish
ICICLE

April 18, 2002

Jim Stanley, COO
Golden Caviar Corp.

Dear Jim:

We look forward to entering a relationship with your company as a supplier of fresh Pink salmon eggs.

Based on our discussions, we agree as follows:

-

-

-

-

-

-



Agreed and confirmed by:

"James B. Stanley"					"Mark Standrik"
Buyer							Seller

"04/18/02"						"4/18/02"
Date							Date



ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC.
4019-21st Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98199 
P.O. Box 79003, Seattle, WA 98119 Tel: 206-282-0988 Fax: 206-282-7222
II 

Calendar No. 208 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1975 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 19, 2011 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, 

California, as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT OLIVER GOODALL POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in 

7 Pasadena, California, shall be known and designated as 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1975 RS

1 the ‘‘First Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘First Lieutenant Oli7 ver Goodall Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 208 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1975 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building’’. vard in Pasadena, California, as the ‘‘First Lieu- al Service located at 281 East Colorado BouleOCTOBER 19, 2011 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GUERRA et al. v. RODRIGUEZ et al.

No. 12658.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 2, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 30, 1953.

Hartley & Lattimore, Raul L. Longoria, Pharr, for appellants.

Raymond, Algee, Alyarado, Kazen & Woods, Laredo, L. Hamilton Lowe, Austin, A. J. Vale, Rio Grande City, for appellees.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court refusing a temporary injunction after a hearing.

The plaintiffs below were property taxpaying citizens of 'Starr County, Texas, and the defendants were the Commissioners’ Court and certain County Officers of Starr County. The suit was for both a temporary and permanent injunction against the defendants, to prevent them from proceeding under the 1953 and 1954 budget for Starr County.

It is not contended that any unlawful expenditures would be made before January 1, 1954. Counsel for appellants, in his oral argument, admitted that the trial court, befor.e refusing the temporary injunction, tendered him a- hearing upon the permanent features of the injunction as of November 3, 1953, and that .this offer was declined by the appellants. Under such circumstances the trial court was justified in refusing the temporary injunction and there is a complete failure to.show that the court in any way abused its discretion in doing so. Texas Foundries, Inc., v. International Moulders & Foundary Workers’ Union, Tex.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 460; Spears v. City of South Houston, 136 Tex. 218, 150 S.W.2d 74.

• The judgment refusing the temporary injunction is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Dickinson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, La Mendola, J.—attempted robbery, third degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

L.M., the mother, 

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2181

[November 27, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Moses Baker, Jr., Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2014-

DP-300835-XXXX-MB.

David J. Joffe of Joffe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee Department of Children and Families. 

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha 

Costas Valley, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division of Florida Statewide 

Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for I.M. and D.B., the children. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit










March 12, 2019


Multi Soft II, Inc.
4400 Biscayne Boulevard; 10th Floor
Miami, FL 33137


Re:    Amendment No. 7 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note


Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the “Revolver”) dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $450,000 to $500,000 and extend the Maturity Date of the Revolver to December 31, 2020 from December 31, 2019.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 7 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


BORROWER:


MULTI SOFT II, INC., a Florida Corporation




By:      /s/ Robert M. Lundgren    
Name:    Robert M. Lundgren
Director


LENDER:


VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation




By:      /s/ Marc N. Bell        
Name:    Marc N. Bell
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JANUARY 26, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED101928 NORMAN GILBERT, RES V AMY (WHITESIDE) GILBERT, 

APP

2. ED102042 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONRICO HOLMES, APP
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   April 29, 2004

By: /s/ Francis V. Dane
          Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer), President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ David A. Gestetner    President, Chief Executive          August 3, 2006
--------------------------    Officer and Chief Financial
        David A. Gestetner    Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer and
                              Principal Financial and
                              Accounting Officer)