alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Leon
Golden, as a Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





By: /S/ Leon GoldenLeon
      GoldenCFODate:  November
      16, 2009
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KATHY ANN SANDERS ,

Appellant ,
v. Cas e No. 5D 22 -635 LT Case No. 2010

- 035066 -CFAES STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed November 22 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Leah R. Case, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R. Gossett, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



I, David H. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc.,
hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.



|            |  |                                        
|----------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|May 4, 2005 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|Date        |  | David H. Fleischman                    
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer,               
|            |  | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
#### PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Steamship THE CHARLES L. O'CONNOR and THE Steamtug KEYSTONE, Etc., Appellees.

No. 440.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 6, 1937.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Frederic Conger, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, Rich*1019ard F. Lenahan, and Leo F. Hanan, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 9, 2008 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell       |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    | **Gregory A. Shortell**       |
|                    | ***Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

1
Exhibit 2

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46810)pertaining to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Salaried Associates of our report dated June 7, 2000, with respectto the financial statements of the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Salaried Associates included in this Annual Report(Form 11-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

New York, New York

June 23, 2000
### Court of A ppea ls , State of M ichigan ORDER David H. Sawyer In re E Wilson, Minor Presiding Judge Docket No . 332866 Jane E . Markey LC No. 14-054181-NA Colleen A . O'Brien Judges The Court orders that the October I 0, 2016 opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read November 10 , 2016 as the date of the opinion. In all other respects , the opinion remains unchanged.

A tru e copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr. , Chief Clerk, on 

## NOV 18 2016 Date
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HAWKINS et al.

No. 8397.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 16, 1937.

Berryman Green and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., James W. .Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Morrison Shafroth, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Charles H. Curl, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Jnternal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Ben D. Clower, of Tyler, Tex., for respondents.

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This case presents merely a question of whether petitioners were entitled to take a deduction on their returns from 1932 for a loss occasioned by the foreclosure of a mortgage and consequent sale of a large tract of land in California in 1931. The facts are not in dispute. The Board in a well-considered opinion, reported in 34 B. T.A. 918, carefully reviewed the law and held that the loss did not occur until the end of the redemption period in 1932.

We concur in the ruling of the Board. The petition is denied and the judgment of the Board is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2039 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2039

       To suspend temporarily the duty on nightlights of plastic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2011

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on nightlights of plastic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NIGHTLIGHTS OF PLASTIC.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new headings:

``     9902.07.01        Nightlights of      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          plastic base                                                      12/31/2013...
                          material
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9405.40.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Retroactive Application.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon 
proper request filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the 
90th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any article--
            (1) that was made on or after January 1, 2011, and before 
        the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        the amendment made by subsection (a) applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1763 

To close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards 

from United States banks that financed their terrorist activities, to 

ensure that illegal immigrants cannot obtain credit cards to evade United 

States immigration laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. BOUSTANY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to 

obtain credit cards from United States banks that financed their terrorist activities, to ensure that illegal 

immigrants cannot obtain credit cards to evade United 

States immigration laws, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY FOR NON-UNITED 

4 STATES PERSONS OPENING BANK ACCOUNTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5318(l) of title 31, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1763 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

2 (6) as paragraphs (4) through (7), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(3) RESTRICTIONS ON VERIFYING IDENTITY.— 

6 ‘‘(A) CUSTOMER INFORMATION.—For the 

7 purpose of verifying the identity of an indi8 vidual who is a non-United States person seek9 ing to open an account in accordance with the 

10 regulations issued under this section, a financial 

11 institution may only accept— 

12 ‘‘(i) a social security number; 

13 ‘‘(ii) a passport number and the coun14 try of issuance; 

15 ‘‘(iii) an alien identification card num16 ber; or 

17 ‘‘(iv) any combination of items de18 scribed in clauses (i) through (iii). 

19 ‘‘(B) CUSTOMER VERIFICATION THROUGH

20 DOCUMENTS.—For the purpose of verifying the 

21 identity of an individual who is a non-United 

22 States person seeking to open an account in ac23 cordance with regulations issued under this sec24 tion, a financial institution may not accept 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1763 IH

1 identification documents issued by a foreign 

2 government, other than an unexpired passport. 

3 ‘‘(C) DEFINITION.—As used in this para4 graph, the term ‘non-United States person’ 

5 means any individual that is not a citizen or na6 tional of the United States, as defined in sec7 tion 101 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5318(l)(6) 

10 of title 31, United States Code, as redesignated by this 

11 section, is amended by striking ‘‘(4)’’ and inserting ‘‘(5)’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 1, 2018

a0423 

# Order

Clerk May 1, 2018

155694

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 5694 COA: 335717 Macomb CC: 2015-000993-FH; JIMMIE LEE CROCKETT, 2015-000994-FH; Defendant-Appellant. 2015-000995-FH

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applic ation for leave to appeal the March 29, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit 31.1****MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION**I, J. Eric Pike, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pike Electric Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                                                                                                  /s/ J. Eric Pike  Date: September 28, 2006 J. Eric Pike   Chairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President
#### SMITH MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant, v. FARMERS IMPLEMENT & SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellee (and consolidated cases).

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 18, 1955.

Warren & Jones, Fulton, John C. Bon-durant, Hickman, for appellant.

Dee L. McNeil, Hickman, F. B. Martin, Mayfield, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080 covering appeals of judgments of less than $2,500. The judgment appealed is for $500. There are three actions involved, but we concur with the opinion of the trial court that the three actions are really one continuous action and should be so treated. The case involved a judgment and attachment of an automobile, its return to the Tennessee seller upon the execution or promise to execute a delivery bond; the attachment of another vehicle of the same seller when no satisfaction was obtained on the judgment; a suit on a su-persedeas bond, and innumerable motions and special pleadings. In a written opinion the learned Trial Judge properly cut this Gordian knot of legalistic complexity and came up with the correct answer.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
July 15, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

O.C.T.G., L.L.P AND SOJOURN PARTNERS, L. L.C. , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 13

- 00981

- CV V.

LAGUNA TUBULAR PRODU CTS CORPORATION AND LTP REAL ESTATE, LLC F/K/A LT P REAL ESTATE, INC. , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the trial court’s order signed October 15, 2013 in favor of appellee s , Laguna Tubular Products Corporation and LTP Real Estate, LLC f/k/ a LTP Real Estate, Inc., was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the trial court’s order AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s O.C.T.G., L.L.P and Sojourn Partners, L.L.C., jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL CORP.**

Silicon Graphics (Canada) Inc. 

SiliconGraphics Limited (Canada) 

Silicon Graphics International, LTD (Cayman Islands) 

Silicon Graphics International Corp. (Delaware) 

Silicon Graphics Federal, Inc. (Delaware) 

SGIInternational, Inc. (Delaware) 

Rackable Systems Limited (Ireland) 

Rackable Asia Pacific Ltd. (Hong Kong) 

Rackable Systems Holding Corp. (Delaware) 

Rackable Systems Canada Acquisition ULC (Alberta) 

Terrascale Technologies ULC (Alberta) 

Rackable Systems Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd (PRC) 

Rackable Systems Holding Corp. (Delaware) 

Cray Foreign Sales Corporation Ltd. (Jamaica) 

Silicon Graphics Pty Ltd. (Australia) 

SiliconGraphics Computer Engineering & Technology (China) Co., Ltd (Beijing) 

Silicon Graphics Limited (Hong Kong) 

Silicon Graphics Systems (India) Limited 

Silicon Graphics Sdn Bhd (Malaysia) 

SiliconGraphics Limited (New Zealand) 

Silicon Graphics Pte Ltd. (Singapore) 

Korea Silicon Graphics Ltd (South Korea) 

Silicon Graphics Limited (Taiwan) 

SiliconGraphics SA/NV (Belgium) 

Alias/Wavefront NV (Belgium) 

Silicon Graphics s.r.o (Czech Republic) 

Silicon Graphics A/S (Denmark) 

Silicon Graphics SA (France) 

Silicon GraphicsGmbH (Germany) 

Silicon Graphics AE (Greece) 

Silicon Graphics Computer Systems Limited (Israel) 

Silicon Graphics Biomedical (1995) Ltd. (Israel) 

Cray Research Israel 

Silicon Graphics SpA(Italy) 

Silicon Graphics BV (Netherlands) 

Silicon Graphics World Trade BV (Netherlands) 

Silicon Graphics Europe Trade BV (Netherlands) 

Silicon Graphics A/S (Norway) 

SiliconGraphics (Pty) Ltd. (South Africa) 

Silicon Graphics SA (Spain) 

Silicon Graphics AB (Sweden) 

Silicon GraphicsS.A. (Switzerland) 

Silicon Graphics Finance S.A. (Switzerland) - formerly Silicon Graphics Manufacturing S.A. 

Silicon Graphics Trading Sarl (Switzerland) 

Silicon Graphics Limited (UK) 

RackableSystems UK Limited (UK) 

Silicon Graphics SA (Argentina) 

Silicon Graphics Comercio E Servicos Limitada (Brazil) 

Silicon Graphics SA (Chile) 

Silicon GraphicsS.A. de C.V. (Mexico) 

Silicon Graphics SA (Venezuela)
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lafayette Community Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David R. Zimmerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David R. Zimmerman
----------------------------
David R. Zimmerman
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350 and not for any other purpose, and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained in 18 U.S.C.ss.1350.


                                       19
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 16, 2019

d0109 

# Order

Clerk January 16, 2019

157740 & (90)(97)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 157740

COA: 332323

Saginaw CC: 05

- 025865

- FH

TOD KEVIN HOUTHOOFD,

Defendant

- Appellant/

Cross

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRAN TED.

The application for leave to appeal the September 14, 2017 and March 15, 2018

judgments of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as

cross

- appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the ques tions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### J. C. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27124.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No appearance for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Robbery is the offense, with punishment assessed at twenty years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor1 bills-of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.