# + 2

(,1 1/,1(

Citation: 37 Fed. Reg. 15081 1972
Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Jun 18 16:54:53 2012
-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License
-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

### RULES AND REGULATIONS

Pollutant Particulate Sulfur INitrogen carbon lP~otochJilcal

xatte" oxides dinxide monoxide oxidants Air quality Pi- secon-Ir- econ I 

# 1ydrocgbons)

control region mry darv iry dy

Cook Inlet Intrastate July 1975 b d (" d- d d
lforthern Alaska July JYul d Intrastate 19751 b d d d "95

South Central Alaska Intrastate d d d d d d d

Southeastern Alaska

. Intrastate d 1 d,

- c , 1 d d

NoTE.-The underlined footnote Is recommended for proposal by the Admlnistrator becausetheplan doesnotprovide a speciftedate.

a. Threeyearsfrom planapproval orpromulgation. b. Elghteen-month extension granted.
c. Air qualitylevelspresentlybelowprimary standardd. Airqualitylevelspresentlybelow secondary standards.
e. Transportation and/or land use control strategies are to be submitted no later than February 15, 1973, withthe firstsemiannual report.

12. In Subpart C, §52.82 is added as follows: § 52.82 Extensions.

(a) TheAdministrator hereby extends for 18months the statutorytimetable for submittal oftheplanfor attainment and maintenance ofthe secondary standards forparticulate matter in the Cook Inlet and NorthernAlaska Intrastate Regions.

13. in Subpart C, 9 52.83 is added as follows: § 52.83 Transportation and land-use controls. (a) To complete the requirements of §§51.11(b) and 51.14 of this chapter, the Governor of Alaska must submit to theAdministrator: (1) No later than February 15, 1973, the selection ofall appropriate transportation and land-use control measures that are necessary to attain and main; tain the national standards for carbon monoxide in the Northern Alaska Intrastate Region by July 1975. A demonstration that said measures, along with the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program, will attain and maintain the national standards must also beincluded. By this date (February 15, 1973), the State must also submit a detailed timetable for obtaining thelegislative authority, regulations and administrative policies required, and a description of the specific responsibilities delineated to the local agencies forcarrying out thetransportation and land-usemeasures by July 1975. (2) Nolater than July 1,1973, thelegislative authority thatis needed for carrying out the required transportation control alternative.

(3) No later than December 30, 1973, the necessary adopted regulations -and administrative policies needed to implement the transportation control alternative 

### Subpart D-Arizona 14. In §52.120, paragraph () is revised to read as follows: 

### § 52.120 Identification ofplan.

(c) Supplemental information was submitted on: 

### (1) March 1, 1972, by the Arizona StateBoard ofHealth, and



### (2) March 2, and May 30, 1972. 15. In §52.122, paragraph (a) 

### is re- vised and paragraph (b) is added. As amended, §52.122 reads as follows: 

### § 52.122 Extensions.

(a) The Administrator hereby extends for 2 years the attainment date for the national primary standards for sulfur oxides andcarbonmonoxide in thePhoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region and for sulfur oxides in the Arizona portions of the Arizona-New Mexico Southern BorderandFour Corners InterstateRegions. (b) TheAdministrator hereby extends 

### for18 monthsthestatutorytimetablefor submittal of theplan forattainment and maintenance ofthe secondary standards 

### for sulfur oxides in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region and the Arizona por- tion of the Arizona-New Mexico South-
emBorder InterstateRegion.



### 16. In §52.125, paragraph (a) is revised and paragraph (b) is added. As amended, § 52.125 reads as follows: § 52.125 Control strategy and regula. 

### tions: Sulfuroxides. (a) The requirements of §§ 51.13 and 51.22 of this chapter are not met since the plan does not Impose specific emission limitations on copper smelters in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region and the Arizona portion of theArizonaNew Mexico Southern Border Interstate Region. In addition, the plan does not 

### require permanent control of emissions from copper smelters necessary to achieve allnational standards for sulfur oxides. Therefore, Regulation 7-1-4.1 (copper smelters) of the Arizona Rules 

### 15081

and Regulations for Air Pollution Con

### trol, as It, pertain to existing copper smelters,is disapproved forthePhoenixTucson Intrastate Region and the Ari-
zona portion of the Arizona-New Mexico, Southern Border Interstate Region. (b) The requirements of &1 5113 and 

### 51.22 of this chapter are not met.since the plan does not provide the degree of control necessary to attain and maintain the national standards for sulfur oxidesIn theArizonaportionofthe Four Corners Interstate Region. Therefore, Regulation 7-1-4.2(C) (fuelburning in

### stallations) of the Arizona Rules and 

### Regulations for AirPollution Control, as It pertains to existing sources, is disapproved in the Arizona portion of the Four Corners Interstate Region for steam power generating Installations having a total rated capacity equal to
or greater than 6,500 million B.t.u. per 

### hour.

17. In 152.126, paragraph Ca) is re- vised to read as follows: 

### §52.126 Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter (a) The requirements of H151.13 and 51.22 of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide the degree of control necessary to attain and maintain the national standards for particulate matter in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region. Therefore, Regulation 7-1-3.6 (process Industries) of the Arizona Rules and Regulations for Air 

### Pollution Control, Rule 31(E) (process industries) in Regulation I of the Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations, and Rule 2(B) (process Industries) in Regulation II of the Rules and Regulations of the Pima County Air Pollution Control District
are disapproved for the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region. 

### §52.128 [Revoked]

18. Section 52.128 is revoked. 19. In §52129, paragraph (a) is re- voked and paragraph (b) is revised. As amended. §52.129 reads as follows: § 52.129 Review of new sources and 

### modification. (a) [Revoked] (b) The requirements of§51.18(c) of this chapter arenotmet in Pima County in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region since the Rules and Regulations of the Pima County Air Pollution Control District arenot adequate toprevent con- struction or modification of a source which would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of the national standards.

20. In §52.130, paragraph (a) is re- vised and paragraph (b) Is revoked. As amended, §52130 reads asfollows: 

### § 52.130 Sourcesurveillance.

(a) The requirements of 

### §51.19(a) of 

### this chapter arenotmet since theplan doesnot containlegally enforceable procedures for requiring sources in Gia, Pinal and Santa Cruz Counties in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 37, NO. 145-THURSDAY, JULY 27, 1972

HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 15081 1972

### RULES AND REGULATIONS

in the Arizona portions of the ArizonaNew Mexico Southern Border, ClarkMohave, andFour CornersInterstateRegions to maintain records of and pe- riodically report on the nature and amounts of emissions.

21. Section 52.131 is revised toread as follows: 

### § 52.131 Attainment dates for national standards. The followingtable presents thelatest dates by which the national standards
are to be attained. These dates reflect the information presented in Arizona's plan,except wherenoted.

I "- Pollutant

Particulate 

### SUlfur
" Iatmatter 

### II oxides

- Photochemncal Airr quality Pr- Secon- 

### Pri

- secon- 

### itrogen Carbon oxidants control re9ion M da ary dary dioxide Monoxide (hydrocarbons)

Wrzona-llew M4exico Southern Border Interstate a A b f 

### C c c Clark-11ohave Interstate a a a a C a Four Corners Interstate 'a a b c C c Phoenix-Tucson luly July July _u__



### Intrastate 975 1977. = b a 1977 1970

No--Dates or footnotes which are underlined are proposed by the Administrator because the plan does notprovide a specific date orthe dateprovided Isnot acceptable.

a. Three years fromplan approval orpromulgation. b. Fiveyears fromplan approval orpromulgation.
c. Airquality levelspresently below secondary standards. d. Transportation and/or land use control strategy to be submitted no later than February 15, 1973, withthe firstsemiannual report.

e. Transportation and/or land use measures will be proposed by the Administrator no later thanFebruary 15, 1973.

f. Eighteen-month extension granted. 

### § 52.132 [Amended]

22. In § 52.132, the words "carbon monoxide and" are added after the word "source" in the first sentence in para- graph (a) (1).

23. In Subpart D, §52.133 is added as follows: 

### § 52.133 Rules andregulations.

(a) Regulation 7-1-1.4(A) (excep- tions) provides for an exemption from enforcement action if the violation is attributable to certain events. These events are too broad in scope and the source can obtain the exemption merely by reporting the occurrence. Therefore, Regulations 7-1-1.4(A) of the Arizona Rules and Regulations for Air Pollution Control is disapproved since this reg- ulation makes all approved emission limiting regulations potentially unenforceable. Subpart I-Delaware 24. In §52.420, paragraph (c)is re- vised to read as follows: 

### § 52.420 Identification ofplan.

(c)Supplemental information was submitted onFebruary 11,March 10,May 5, June 2, and June 5, 1972, by the State of Delaware, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control.

25. In § 52.426, paragraph (a) is re- vised toread asfollows: 

### § 52.426 Review of new sources and modifications. (a) Therequirements of §51.18(c) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide for a means of disap- proving construction or modification of
a stationary source if such construction or modification will result in a violation of applicable portions of the control strategy or willinterfere withattainment
or maintenance of a national standard. 

### § 52.427 [Revoked]

26. Section 52.427 is revoked. 27. Section 52.428 isrevised to read as follows: 

### § 52.428 Attainment dates for national standards. The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained. These dates reflect the information presented in the Dela-
ware plan.

Pollutant Particulate

. Sulfur

matter oxides. Photochemical Air quality Pi- Secon- Pri- Secon- Kitrogen Carbon oxidants control region ary dary mary dary dioxide monoxide (hydrocarbons) Iletropolitan Philadelphia Jan. Jan. Jan. Jan. Jan. Jan. Interstate 1972 1973 1972 1973 1974 1974 Southern Delarate ,Intrastate a a a a a a a
a.

Airqualitylevelspresentlybelowsecondarystandards. 

### Subpart M-Hawali
28. In §52.620, paragraph (c) is re- vised to read as follows: 

### § 52.620 Identification ofplan.

c) Supplemental Information waa submitted on:

(1) April 4, 1972, by the Department ofHealth, (2) May 8, May 22, andJuno 15, 1972. 

### § 52.624 [Amended]

29. In §52.624, paragraph (a) Is revoked. 

### § 52.625 [Revoked]

30. Section52.625 Isrevoked. 31. In §52.626, paragraph (a) is re- vised and paragraph (b) Is added. As amended, § 52.626 reads as follows: 

### § 52.626 Compliance schedules.

(a) Therequirements of §51.15(a) (2) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide a legally enforceable final date by which all individual source compliance schedules must be negotiated. Therefore, section 0 of the Hawaii Air Pollution Control Regula- tions is disapproved. (b) The requirements of § 51.15(o) of thischapter arenot metsinceincrements of progress towards compliance are not provided for in section 12(b) (compli-
ance schedule for bagasse-burning boilers) of theHawaiiAirPollution Control Regulations. Therefore, section 12 (b) of the Hawaii Air Pollution Control Regulations, as It pertains to existing sources, Is disapproved. Subpart N-Idaho 32. In §52.670, paragraph (c) Is re- visedto read asfollows: § 52.670 Identification ofplan.

(c) Supplemental information was submitted on:

(1) February 23 and April 12, 1972, by the Idaho AirPollution Control Commission, and (2) March 2, May 5 and June 9, 1972. 33. Section 52.672 Is amended by addIngparagraph (b), as follows: 

### § 52.672 Extensions.

(b) The Administrator hereby ex- tends for 2 years the attainment date for the primary standards for sulfur oxides in the Idaho portion of the East-
em Washington-Northern Idaho Interstate Region. 

### § 52.676 [Amended]

34. In paragraph (a) of §52.670, the word, "prove" is changed to "provide." 

### § 52.673 [Revoked]

35. Section 52.678 Isrevoked.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 37, NO. 145-THUSDAY, JULY 27, 1972 

### 15082

HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 15082 1972