alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of DataMill Media Corp. (f/k/a/Smitten
Press: Local Lore and Legends, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Beatty, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: December 6, 2010


/s/ Vincent Beatty
------------------------------------------
Vincent Beatty
Director acting as Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 21




            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY


Listed below are subsidiaries of the registrant at December 31, 1996.
Certain subsidiaries are omitted since such companies considered in the
aggregate do not constitute a significant subsidiary.


                                                    State or Jurisdiction
                                                     in Which Subsidiary
                                                      Was Incorporated
          Name of Company                               or Organized
          ---------------                           ---------------------

American Olefins, Inc.                                    Delaware
GPM Anadarko Gathering Company                            Delaware
GPM Gas Corporation                                       Delaware
Phillips Alaska Natural Gas Corporation                   Delaware
Phillips China Inc.                                       Liberia
Phillips Coal Company                                     Nevada
Phillips Gas Company                                      Delaware
Phillips Investment Company                               Nevada
Phillips Oil Company (Nigeria) Limited                    Nigeria
Phillips Petroleum Canada Ltd.                            Canada
Phillips Petroleum Chemicals                              Belgium
Phillips Petroleum Company Indonesia                      Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Company Norway                         Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Company United Kingdom Limited         England
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere             Delaware
Phillips Petroleum International Corporation              Panama
Phillips Petroleum International Corporation Denmark      Cayman Islands
Phillips Petroleum International Investment Company       Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Resources, Ltd.                        Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Timor Sea Inc.                         Delaware
Phillips Petroleum UK Investment Corporation              Delaware
Phillips Pipe Line Company                                Delaware
Phillips Puerto Rico Core Inc.                            Delaware
Phillips-San Juan Partners, L.P.                          Delaware
Sooner Insurance Company                                  Vermont
The Largo Company                                         Delaware
WesTTex 66 Pipeline Company                               Delaware


<PAGE>
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, our financial condition and result of operations. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                                                                                  |                                         |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                          | SALON                CITY,                INC.(Registrant)                                       |
|                                          |                                                                                                  |                                         |
| Date: March                13, 2008 | By:                                                                                              | /s/ Steven                Casciola |
|                                          | Steven                CasciolaChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-137628) of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. of our report dated June 26, 2007, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd., included
in its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 26, 2007.

|                 |                                 
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|June 26, 2007    | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
II 

Calendar No. 373 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2079 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, 

as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 10 Main Street in East Rock6 away, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2079 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John J. Cook Post 

5 Office’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 373 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2079 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Rockaway, New York, as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post al Service located at 10 Main Street in East 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**






In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Segway IV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donny
      Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
            Such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
                2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
                the
                period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway
                IV,
                Inc.




Dated:
      August 21, 2006






By: /s/
      Donny Smith


Donny
      Smith


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
NMR Spectra
#### BATSON v. STATE.

No. 26575.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is vagrancy; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All of the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-160597 and 333-139645 on Form S-3, and Registration Statements Nos. 333-158093 and 333-139128 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Jamba, Inc. and subsidiary for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jamba, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2009.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche
LLP
|                         
|San Francisco, California
|March 10, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Jan Kees
van Gaalen, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2014, of Dresser-Rand Group Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 29, 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jan Kees van Gaalen                             
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Jan Kees van Gaalen                                 
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2024 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures 

governing the closure or consolidation of postal branches and stations 

shall be the same as those applicable in the case of post offices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that 

the procedures governing the closure or consolidation 

of postal branches and stations shall be the same as 

those applicable in the case of post offices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post Office Trans5 parency Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2024 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROCEDURES RELATING TO POSTAL 

2 CLOSINGS AND CONSOLIDATIONS. 

3 Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) For purposes of subsections (a)(3) and (d)— 

6 ‘‘(1) the term ‘post office’ includes a branch, 

7 station, or other facility which— 

8 ‘‘(A) is operated by the Postal Service; and 

9 ‘‘(B) provides services to persons described 

10 in paragraph (2); and 

11 ‘‘(2) any reference in subsection (d) to the per12 sons served by a post office shall include any postal 

13 patrons receiving mail delivery services from such 

14 post office, residents within any ZIP code served by 

15 such post office, postal patrons having post office 

16 boxes at such post office, and the relevant local gov17 ernment officials (as defined under regulations of 

18 the Postal Service).’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Kerry Jon Aitchison a/k/a Kerry * From the 35 0 th District Court

Jon Atkinson a/k/a Kerry Attchison, of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 12118

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 0005 4

- CR * January 31 , 201 9

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment o f the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1699 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1699

                  To prohibit assistance to Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2011

 Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. West) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  To prohibit assistance to Pakistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pakistan Foreign Aid Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

    (a) Prohibition.--Assistance may not be provided to Pakistan under 
any provision of law unless the Secretary of State certifies to 
Congress that--
            (1) the Government of Pakistan did not have any information 
        regarding Osama bin Laden's possible whereabouts on or after 
        September 11, 2001; or
            (2) if the Government of Pakistan did have information 
        regarding Osama bin Laden's possible whereabouts on or after 
        September 11, 2001, it communicated such information to the 
        United States Government in an expedited manner.
    (b) Form of Certification.--A certification described in subsection 
(a) shall be submitted--
            (1) in writing and include specific findings and 
        conclusions; and
            (2) in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
        annex if necessary.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to amounts allocated 
for assistance to Pakistan that are unexpended on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated April 16, 2007, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule (which report contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys adoption of SFAS 123R, Shared-Based Payment on January 1, 2006) included in the Annual Report of
WorldSpace, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the following Registration Statements of WorldSpace, Inc.:



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-127328
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-139125
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-136740
| | - |  | ------------------------

/s/ Grant Thornton
LLP

McLean, Virginia

April 16, 2007
### SERVEDMARCH10,201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
IN TH EMATTE RO F RUSHMOB EHELICOPTERS , INC
. FA A DOCKE T No
. CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2010-002 3 ORDE R GRANTIN G MOTIO N FO R EXTENSIO N O F TIM E Responden t Rushmor

e Helicopters , Inc
. (hereinafte r"Respondenf ) has move d fo ra 30-da

yextensio n o

f time , o runti l Apri l 5 , 2010 , t o answe ro rotherwis e plea d i n respons e t o th e Complain t o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r "Complainanf)

. I n suppor t Responden t cite s th e pres s o f othe rbusiness
. I t als o state s that Complainan t counse l has bee n contacte d an d expresse s n o objectio n t o gran t o f th e motion
. Respondent' s motio n i s herebyGRANTED

. Respondent' s responsive pleadin g shall.b e file d n o late rtha n Apri l 5 , 2010
. 

### IjCAdlu ^ C (j-^H^^A.^^^^

^ Richar d C

. Goodwi n Administrativ e La

wJudg e Attachmen t - Service ListFA A Docke t No
. CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l Jacob , Responden t Presiden t o r CE O Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc
. 2456 4 Highwa y 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 Chri s G
. Zurales , Complainant' s Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e De s Plaines , I L60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. For

servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
#### W. G. WHEELER et al., d/b/a J. C. Collieries, Inc., Appellants, v. EAST KENTUCKY MACHINE & ELECTRIC CO., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 18, 1955.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1955.

E.' D. Stephenson, Pikeville,' for appellants.

V. R. Bentley, Pikeville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court awarding appellee $834.50 in a suit on an open account. The facts, questions raised, authorities cited and applicable law have been carefully considered by the court, and we find no prejudicial error.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### Charles David KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27438.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for • appellant.

. Henry . Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

- MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $125.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was probated.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.
#### ARDREY et vir. v. RUTH et ux.

No. 13629.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

June 29, 1945.

Ray Holder, of Dallas, for appellants.

Hay, Kirk & Baggett, of Houston, for appellees.

BOND, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of a district court of Dallas County, Texas, sustaining a plea of privilege timely filed by appellees and transferring the cause for trial on its merits to a district court of Harris County, Texas. The suit is in the nature of a habeas corpus proceeding attacking the right of appellees to the custody of a minor child, on the ground that plaintiff, Mrs. Hortense Ardrey, nee Kar-ner, is the child’s mother and that custody of the child was obtained by appellees by force, threats and fraud, and on false representations, thereby inducing the mother to part with her custody.

The merits of the case are not before us, and are yet to be determined by the receiving court. Appellees reside in Harris County, and have had custody of the minor child, on order of adoption by a district court of that county, for more than five years next preceding the filing of this suit. The authorities declare that it is not within the province of appellate courts to pass upon the merits of a cause of action on appeal from an interlocutory order, or to consider any matters which do not relate to the propriety of the order appealed from, and this rule has been applied to orders overruling and sustaining pleas of privilege. Lind v. Merchants’ State Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 16 S.W.2d 385; United Chemical Co. v. Leathers, Tex.Civ.App. 285 S.W. 918; Wolfe v. Sahm, 55 Tex.Civ.App. 564, 120 S.W. 1114; Id.,55 Tex.Civ.App. 564, 121 S.W. 561.

This appeal is without a statement of facts, hence we must assume that the judgment below is fully supported by evidence as to venue of the cause. Venue of suits for readjudication or involving the custody of minors, is- definitely fixed in the county of the residence of the minor, or custodian of the minor to whom custody has been awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction. Flannery v. Eblen, Tex.Civ.App., 106 S.W.2d 837, error dismissed; Lakey v. McCarroll, 134 Tex. 191, 134 S.W.2d 1016; Wilson v. Wilson, 137 Tex. 528, 155 S.W.2d 601; Conlee v. Burton, Tex.Civ.App., 188 S.W.2d 713. In the case here, the Harris County District Court having awarded the child to appellees, and the custodian and the child being residents *16of that county, if there is any vice in the award, venue is in Harris County. We express no opinion on the merits of this cause challenging the validity of the order of adoption, leaving that for the determination of the court to which the case has been transferred by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.