alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


April 9, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 424 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on April 8, 2019, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-229704) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  August 28, 2019





PVH CORP.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212)-381-3500


Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock, $1.00 par valuePVHNew York Stock Exchange


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company o


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---
















ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION


On August 28, 2019 , PVH Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release to report the Company’s earnings for the second quarter 2019 , which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1.


The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d) Exhibits .


ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated August 28, 2019.











---










SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





PVH CORP.





By: /s/ James W. Holmes


James W. Holmes


Senior Vice President and Controller





Date: August 28, 2019
#### Elmer “Frenchy” DAVIS and Rose Davis, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.c

June 24, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 30, 1955.

Davies & Hirschfeld, Newport, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Elmer “Frenchy” Davis and Rose Davis, his wife, were convicted of a charge of procuring and soliciting a person for purposes of prostitution under KRS 436.075. The punishment for each was fixed at one year’s confinement in the county jail. A joint motion for an appeal has been made.

Judgment in a companion case has this day been reversed. Davis v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 714.

The record and the errors assigned therein have been examined and considered. No prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2176 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2176

  To dedicate a portion of the rental fees from wind and solar energy 
 projects on Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land 
Management for the administrative costs of processing applications for 
          new wind and solar projects, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2011

  Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To dedicate a portion of the rental fees from wind and solar energy 
 projects on Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land 
Management for the administrative costs of processing applications for 
          new wind and solar projects, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Energy Promotion Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPOSIT AND USE OF ANNUAL WIND ENERGY AND SOLAR ENERGY RIGHT-
              OF-WAY AUTHORIZATION RENTAL FEES.

    (a) Deposit of Annual Wind Energy and Solar Energy Right-of-Way 
Authorization Rental Fees.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
amounts received up to $5,000,000 each fiscal year by the United States 
as annual wind energy and solar energy right-of-way authorization fees 
required under section 504(g) of the Federal Land Policy and Management 
Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1764(g)) shall be deposited into a separate 
account in the Treasury to be known as the ``BLM Wind Energy and Solar 
Energy Permit Processing Improvement Fund''.
    (b) Use of Deposits.--Amounts deposited under subsection (a) shall 
be available to the Secretary of the Interior for expenditure, without 
further appropriation and without fiscal year limitation, for salaries 
and expenses related to the Bureau of Land Management offices dedicated 
to the coordination and processing of wind energy and solar energy 
permit applications.
    (c) Transfer of Funds.--For the purposes of coordination and 
processing of wind energy and solar energy permit applications on 
public lands, the Secretary of the Interior may authorize the 
expenditure or transfer of such amounts deposited under subsection (a) 
as are necessary to--
            (1) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
            (2) the Environmental Protection Agency; and
            (3) State agencies involved in processing of wind and solar 
        permits on Federal lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau 
        of Land Management.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 29, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2092 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2092

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2011

Mr. Grimm (for himself, Mr. Young of Indiana, Mr. Guinta, Mr. Stivers, 
 Mr. Walberg, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Stutzman, Mrs. Blackburn, 
Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Hanna, 
   Mr. Yoder, Mr. Pompeo, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. 
 Ribble, Mr. Terry, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. 
   Crawford, Mr. Denham, and Mr. Rogers of Michigan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 49 and by striking the item relating to 
such chapter in the table of chapters of such subtitle.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services performed after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Site Related Environmental Assessment Program 3M and Dyneon LLC Decatur, Alabama

Raw Data Appendices: April 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012 Quarterly Status Report 

## Volume 2 GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 30 GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 31 GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 32

11P-0094-v2-1 two 3M Company St. Paul, Minnesota

®
Exhibit 99.3

WESTPAC BANKING CORPORAITON

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The
undersigned, a duly authorised representative of Westpac Banking Corporation, acting as Servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Westpac Banking Corporation, Westpac Securities Administration Limited as Trustee
and Westpac Securitisation Management Pty Limited as Trust Manager dated 12 March 2002 (the Agreement), certifies that:

1. As of the date
hereof, Westpac Banking Corporation is the Servicer of Series 2002-1G WST Trust and Series 2005  1G WST Trust (Trusts).

2. A review of
the activities of the Servicer during the 12 months ending 30 June 2006 and its performance under the pooling and servicing agreement or similar agreement, referred to above as the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

3. Based on such review, to my knowledge and after making appropriate enquiries, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement or
similar agreement relating to the Trusts throughout the financial year ended 30 June 2006, except as may be set forth in paragraph 4 below.

4. The following is a description of any exceptions to paragraph 3. above: None.

Capitalised terms used but not defined in
this Officers Certificate of Compliance have their respective meanings set forth in the Agreement, unless the context requires otherwise or unless otherwise defined in the Officers Certificate.



|               |  |                           
|-------------- |  | --------------------------
|Signature:     |  | /s/ Trudy Vonhoff         
|Name:          |  | Trudy Vonhoff             
|Title:         |  | General Manager Operations
|25 August 2006
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Douglas G. Bryant, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986]

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated:  August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant                    
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  | Douglas G. Bryant
Chief Financial Officer
DENY; and Opinion Filed March 22, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00320-CV

IN RE AMERICAN NATIONAL COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02965-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relator contends the trial judge erred in denying a motion to quash and motion for 

protective order and in denying a motion to compel. The facts and issues are well known to the 

parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator 

has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. 

Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and second emergency motion for temporary relief.

130320F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
Exhibit 3(i)(b)

                    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                             TO THE
              RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                               OF
                   PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
                     A DELAWARE CORPORATION

     Phillips Petroleum Company, a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company"),
does hereby certify as follows:

          FIRST:  That in accordance with the provisions of
     Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
     Delaware (the "DGCL"), the Board of Directors of the Company
     duly adopted resolutions setting forth an amendment to the
     Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (this
     "Amendment") and deeming this Amendment advisable.

          SECOND:  That written notice of this Amendment was duly
     given in accordance with Section 222 of the DGCL to
     stockholders of the Company.

          THIRD:  That this Amendment was approved by
     stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 242 of the
     DGCL.

          FOURTH:  That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
     of the Company is hereby amended as follows:

               Section (a) of Article Fourth of the Restated
          Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
          hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
          follows:

                    "(a) Capital Stock.  The corporation shall
               have the authority to issue one billion
               (1,000,000,000) shares of common stock, par value
               $1.25 per share, and 300 million (300,000,000)
               shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per
               share."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate
to be signed by its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Chief Administrative Officer and attested by its Secretary this
23rd day of April, 2001.

Attest:

   /s/ Dale J. Billam              /s/ J. Bryan Whitworth
--------------------------      --------------------------------
Name:  Dale J. Billam           Name:  J. Bryan Whitworth
Title: Secretary                Title: Executive Vice President,
                                       General Counsel and
                                       Chief Administrative
                                       Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 (No.  333-127350)  of  Colonial  Bankshares,  Inc. of our
report dated March 10, 2006, relating to the consolidated  financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report to  Stockholders,  which is  incorporated  by
reference in this Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31,
2005.


                                                    /s/ Beard Miller Company LLP


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2006
#### ALAMO v. STATE.

No. 23571.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1947.

Rehearing Denied March 19, 1947.

Roger Lewis, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Theft from the person is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The injured party was positive in her identification of the appellant as the person who suddenly grabbed, or, as she says, “snatched” her purse containing $20 in money, as she was walking near her home at night.

Appellant did not testify. The defense of alibi was presented.

The facts are sufficient to support the jury’s finding.

The only bills of exception appearing in the record complain of argument of State’s counsel. In none of these is it disclosed or stated that the argument complained of was not in reply to argument of appellant’s counsel, or provoked or invited. The bills do not, therefore, reflect improper or prejudicial argument. See Sanchez v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 181 S.W.2d 87; Cavazos v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 186 S.W.2d 990. Moreover, the argument complained of in each bill did not violate any statutory or mandatory rule and was not, obviously, hurtful upon its face. It cannot be said that appellant was injured thereby, in view of the infliction of the minimum punishment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant complains in his motion of portions of the Assistant District Attorney’s argument to the jury and presents in his Bill No. 1 all of such argument and excepts to isolated portions thereof in further bills. Some of the arguments objected to should doubtless not have been made. However, the careful trial court sustained objections to those that he thought were improper and instructed the jury to disregard the same. Unquestionably the jury had a sufficient amount of testimony to show the guilt of appellant; and there was testimony in the record to show that appellant was in possession of other property not his own which was claimed by and restored to persons other than appellant. This unobjected to testimony was probably the basis of the remarks by the State’s attorney, which we think were proper deductions from the testimony. Under the facts admitted in evidence, we are impressed with the con-*162elusion that the State fully proved the appellant’s gfuilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The verdict of the jury assessing a penalty of two years was the lowest allowed by the statute. Evidently the appellant did not suffer any harm from such remarks, and we express the opinion that no error is shown in all these bills.

The motion will therefore be overruled.