alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure. 

D No Change from existing AD action 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2015-CE-025-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals zpdate accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

Action propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost (e.g., Inspection, (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet replacement) access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Part I - Inspection 2.0 1,375 

Part IIRepair I 8.0 $500 1,375 

modification 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,856,250 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that 

was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): All aircraft require the 

inspection. The repair I modification is based on the results of the inspection. It is anticipated that all 

of the aircraft will require the repair I modification. The current FAA registry shows 977 active 

aircraft, so this analysis using 1,375 aircraft is conservative. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

YES* D NO(gi 
*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D N0[8J 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. • 

YES D NO [8J 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO [8J 

*Explanation:
Order filed November 16, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00157-CV

____________

JOSE DOMINGUEZ, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK FSB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCV-202842

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for 

the 434th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On July 6, 2017, the clerk of this 

court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not 

require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this 

court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 
Appellant replied claiming to have made arrangements for payment of the 

court reporter’s record. On November 13, 2017, this court received notice that 

appellant has not made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty days 

of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the annual report for Diamond Ranch Foods,  Ltd, on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), the undersigned,  William
DeMarzo,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer  of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006


By:    /s/ William DeMarzo
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
       William DeMarzo, Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OMB APPROVALOMB Number:

3235-0456Expires:

July 31, 2006Estimated average burdenHours per response . . . . .
2UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549**FORM 24F-2****Annual Notice of Securities Sold****Pursuant to Rule 24f-2***Read instructions at end of Form before preparing Form.*1.
Name and address of issuer:Jefferson Pilot Separate Account A100 Greene StreetGreensboro, NC 274012.
The name of each series or class of securities for which this Form is filed (If the Form is being filed for all seriesand classes of securities of the issuer, check the box but do not list series or classes):
X3.
Investment Company Act File Number:
811-02188Securities Act File Number:
033-110844(a).
Last day of fiscal year for which this Form is filed:
12-31-044(b).

Check box if this Form is being filed late (*i.e.*, more than 90 calendar days after the end of theissuer's fiscal year). (See Instruction A.2)4(c).

Check box if this is the last time the issuer will be filing this Form.5.
Calculation of registration fee:(i)
Aggregate sale price of securities sold during the fiscal year pursuant to section 24(f):


$ 5,332,168(ii)
Aggregate price of securities redeemed or repurchased during the fiscal year:
$ 30,814,733(iii)
Aggregate price of securities redeemed or repurchased during any*prior*fiscal year ending no earlier than October 11, 1995 that were not previously used to reduce registration fees payable to the Commission:
$ 0(iv)
Total available redemption credits [add Items 5(ii) and 5(iii)]:

-
$ 30,814,733(v)
Net sales -- if Item 5(i) is greater than Item 5(iv) [subtract Item 5(iv) from Item 5(i)]:


$ (25,482,565)(vi)
Redemption credits available for use in future years -- if Item 5(i) is less than Item 5(iv) [subtract Item 5(iv) from Item 5(i)]:
$ 0(vii)
Multiplier for determining registration fee (See Instruction C.9):

x
0.0001177(viii)
Registration fee due [multiply Item 5(v) by Item 5(vii)] (enter "0" if no fee is due):

=
$ 06.
Prepaid SharesIf the response to Item 5(i) was determined by deducting an amount of securities that were registered under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to rule 24e-2 as in effect before October 11, 1997, then report the amount of securities (number of shares or other units) deducted here: 0. If there is a number of shares or other units that were registered pursuant to rule 24e-2 remaining unsold at the end of the fiscal year for which this form is filed that are available for use by the issuer in future fiscal years, then state that number here: 0.7.
Interest due -- if this Form is being filed more than 90 days after the end of the issuer's fiscal year (see Instruction D):

+
$ 08.
Total of the amount of the registration fee due plus any interest due (line 5(viii) plus line 7]:
=
$ 09.
Date the registration fee any interest payment was sent to the Commission's lockbox depository:
03-29-05Method of Delivery:X
Wire TransferMail or other meansSIGNATURESThis report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the issue and in the capacities and on thedates indicated.By (Signature and Title):/s/ Frederick C. TedeschiFrederick C. TedeschiAssociate CounselDate:

March 24, 2005
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Leon
Golden, as a Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





By: /S/ Leon GoldenLeon
      GoldenCFODate:  May
      14, 2010
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Bel Fuse’s Registration Statement
Nos. 333-89376 and No. 333-65627 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2010,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Bel
Fuse Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company”) and the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which expresses an
unqualified opinion appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





New York,
New York


March 12,
2010
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 42 (Friday, March 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15262-15263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Notice of Renewal of the Art Advisory Panel of the Commissioner 
of Internal Revenue

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal of the Art Advisory Panel of the Commissioner 
of Internal Revenue.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The charter for the Art Advisory Panel has been renewed for a 
two-year period beginning January 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin B. Lawhorn, 400 West Bay Street, 
Suite 252, Jacksonville, FL 32202. Telephone (904) 661-3198 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009, that the 
Art Advisory Panel of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, a necessary 
committee that is in the public interest, has been renewed for an 
additional two years beginning on January 24, 2024.
    The Panel helps the Internal Revenue Service review and evaluate 
the acceptability of property appraisals

[[Page 15263]]

submitted by taxpayers in support of the fair market value claimed on 
works of art involved in Federal Income, Estate or Gift taxes in 
accordance with sections 170, 2031, and 2512 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, as amended.
    For the Panel to perform this function, Panel records and 
discussions must include tax return information. Therefore, the Panel 
meetings will be closed to the public since all portions of the 
meetings will concern matters that are exempted from disclosure under 
the provisions of section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6) and (7) of Title 5 of 
the U.S. Code. This determination, which is in accordance with section 
10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, is necessary to protect 
the confidentiality of tax returns and return information as required 
by section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Daniel I. Werfel,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2024-04314 Filed 2-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.40
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Company Employee
 RECITALS
   NOW, THEREFORE
 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS
 1.
    
    Article 1.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the
following is inserted in its place:The Company employs Employee, and Employee accepts employment by the Company, for the
period commencing on the date hereof and continuing on a month-to-month basis, subject
to earlier termination as hereinafter set forth in Article III (the Employment
Term). Upon agreement of the parties, or upon thirty days prior written notice
of intention by one party to the other of an intention to terminate the Employment
Term, Employees employment with the Company, and the Companys obligations hereunder
shall terminate. In any event, the termination of employment shall be considered a
Termination upon Retirement as set forth in Article 3.1(e), and the requirement of 90
days notice of retirement as required by Article 3.1(e) is not valid.2.
    
    Article 2.2 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the
following is inserted in its place:Should Employees employment be terminated by agreement of the parties or at the
request of the Company, Employee will be entitled to receive a stay bonus equal to
$140,000 pro-rated by the number of days Employee is employed in calendar year 2009.
Such bonus shall be a lump sum payment




---



##### 



made within thirty days of Employees last day of work, and shall be paid less any
applicable required payroll deductions. Employee will not be entitled to any bonus if
he terminates employment earlier than agreed to by the Company.
   EMPLOYEE:
    
    COMPANY:Stephen C. Hathaway
    
    TomoTherapy Incorporated/s/ Stephen C. Hathaway
    
    By: /s/ Frederick A. Robertson, M.D.Frederick A. Robertson, M.D.Chief Executive Officer
----

| Yunni      Pao | 10364      Dempster Avenue |
|----------------|----------------------------|

|   | Cupertino,      CA 95014 |
|--------|--------------------------|

| James      Pao | 2560  Sherborne      Drive |
|----------------|--------------------------------------|

|   | Belmont,      CA 94002 |
|--------|------------------------|

| Henry      C. Pao | 10364      Dempster Avenue |
|-------------------|----------------------------|

|   | Cupertino,      CA 95014 |
|--------|--------------------------|

----

----

----

----
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Adam WassermanName: Adam WassermanTitle: Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer  Dated: February 22, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### SHROYER v. STATE.

No. 24249.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Crim. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment,'three months in jail.

*22No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

The indictment charged the offense for which appellant stands convicted.

Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of 'the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Service
Air Group, Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, I, Mohammad Sultan, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Service Air Group, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
          31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended March 31, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service
          Air Group, Inc.

Dated:    May 14, 2004

Service Air Group, Inc.

By:  /s/ Mohammad Sultan
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, J. Michael Wolfe, certify that:





1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 of AeroGrow International, Inc.;





2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and





(b)           Omitted; and





(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:     August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ J. Michael WolfeJ. Michael WolfePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway,

Justic es

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 27, 2010

s0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

139686

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 139686

COA: 292271

Oakland CC: 2005

- 204094

- FC

THOMAS EUGENE MOORE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the September 1, 2009

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit
32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 Dated:
March 28, 2005
 
 By: /s/
Daniel Bernstein
 Daniel
Bernstein, President
 and Chief
Executive Officer
```
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Service
Air Group, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, I, Mohammad Sultan,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Service Air Group, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service
          Air Group, Inc.
Dated:    May 30, 2007

Service Air Group, Inc.

By:  /s/ Mohammad Sultan
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
```