alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing by AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, H. MacGregor Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: June 25, 2010
By:
/s/ H. MacGregor ClarkeH. MacGregor ClarkeChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0887 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-02-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Marilyn Hanks, * From the 29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C48039.

Vs. No. 11-18-00112-CV * September 27, 2018

City of Mineral Wells, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

 This court has considered Marilyn Hanks’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Marilyn Hanks.
Exhibit 32.1

                        POWER SAVE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Power Save International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Norman J. Birmingham, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ RUSSELL L. SMITH
--------------------
Russell L. Smith President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) and Director
November 15, 2004

The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
#### John M. ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27104.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, to-wit: whiskey, on Sunday, in a wet area, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

There appears in this record neither a recognizance nor an appeal bond. In the absence of a sufficient appeal bond or recognizance or a'showing that appellant is in jail, this court is without jurisdiction of a misdemeanor appeal. White v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 315, 221 S.W. 283; Skinner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W .2d 167; Braun v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 257 S.W.2d 708.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

TK REAL ESTATE L.L.C.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00287

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014

- CCV01128)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on joint motion to dismiss and concludes the motion

should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with the opinion of this

Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order costs be assessed against the party

incurring same. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED TH IS 1 9 TH DAY OF MARCH , 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Hughes, J., not participating)
#### NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK CO. v. SCHAUFFLER et al.*

No. 4222.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 2, 1937.

*731Fred II. Skinner, of Newport News, Va., and H. II. Rumble, of Norfolk, Va. (John Marshall, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

Malcolm F. Halliday, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before PARKER, NORTIICOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.

*

Writ of certiorari granted 58 S.Ct. 43, 82 L.Ed. —.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree denying an application for a preliminary injunction and dismissing a bill of complaint which asked that the appellees be enjoined from proceeding to hear and pass upon a complaint filed with the Board charging the Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company with violations of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.). Upon motion made before this court for a restraining order pending appeal, the merits of the appeal have been fully argued and the cause submitted for final determination as to the correctness of the decree appealed from. Without expressing any opinion whatever on any aspect of the controversy pending before the Board, we are of opinion that the action of the court below was correct. Plaintiff has an adequate remedy under the statute and may not apply for relief in equity until it has exhausted the administrative remedy there provided. The matter has been so fully considered in other circuits as not to require further discussion. See particularly Pratt v. Oberman & Co. (C.C.A.8th) 89 F.(2d) 786; Beman v. Bendix Products Corp. (C.C.A.7th) 89 F.(2d) 661; Clark v. Lindemann & Hoverson Co. (C.C.A.7th) 88 F.(2d) 59; Elliott v. El Paso Electric Co. (C.C.A.5th) 88 F.(2d) 505; Heller Bros. Co. v. Lind, 66 App.D.C. 306, 86 F.(2d) 862; E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.2d) 85 F.(2d) 12; Precision Castings Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.2d) 85 F.(2d) 15; Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. v. Herrick (C.C.A.2d) 85 F.(2d) 16; Bradley Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (C.C.A.5th) 84 F.(2d) 97. Contra Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. (C.C.A.1st) 88 F.(2d) 154, 156.

The application for restraining order pending appeal will be denied and the decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Repligen Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WALTER C.
HERLIHY
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Walter C. Herlihy                           
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Executive Officer and President       
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | (Principal executive officer)               
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: June 9, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM J.
KELLY 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | William J. Kelly                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | (Principal financial and accounting officer)
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 26, 2009

p0623 

# Order

June 26, 2009

137232

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137232 COA: 277788 Oakland CC: 2007-212616-FH GARON KEILAN PLUMP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY

, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.

C AVANAGH

, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the issue in People v
Watkins , 482 Mich 1114 (2008).
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 20 96

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Glen Sp rin ge r,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt ,

v.
Co rp or al Ben

jam in Dale Cap le , als o k no wn as D. Cabl e; D. Reed , W ard en , Oua ch it a Ri ve r Uni t, ADC; Dep. As si st . W ard en Gary A. Mus se lwh it e,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Ho t Sp rin gs

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Marc h 2 8, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Apri l 3 , 20 18 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, COLLOTON , and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is pr o se 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n, Ark an sa s in m at e Glen Sp rin ge r ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary jud gm en t. The di st ric t co ur t gr an te d

su m m ary jud gme n t b as ed on it s co nc lu si on th at Sp rin ge r fai le d to ex ha us t ad m in is tra ti ve rem ed ie s an d fai le d to es tabl is h a n Ei gh th Am en dm en t vi ol at io n.Upo n de no vo rev ie w, se e Ki ng v. Io wa Dep ’t of Co r r s

. , 5 9 8 F.3 d 10 51 , 10 52 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ), we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t c o u r t t ha t Sp rin ge r fai le d to ex ha us t ad m in is tra ti ve rem ed ie s be fo re fil in g su it an d th eref or e a f f i r m th e di sm is sa l of th e act io n on th at ba si s. Se e 42 U.S.C. § 19 97 e(a) ; Ki ng , 59 8 F.3 d at 10 53

. W e m od ify th e di sm is sa l, ho wev er, to be wit ho ut pr ejud ic e. Se e Por te r v. St ur m , 78 1 F.3 d 44 8, 45 2 ( 8 t h C i r

. 2 01 5) ; Dav is v. Har mon , 38 9 Fed

. App x. 58 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (u np ub li sh ed pe r cu ria m ). W e al so co nc lu de th e di st ric t co ur t pr op erl y de n ie d Sp rin ge r’s m ot io n fo r reco ns id erat io n. Se e Uni te d S ta te s v. Met ro . St . L ou is Se wer Dis t. , 44 0 F .3d 93 0, 9 33 (8t h C ir. 2 00 6)

.
The jud gm en t i s af

fir m edas m od ifi ed

. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the 
                   ``Matthew A. Pucino Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Matthew A. Pucino Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew A. 
Pucino Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the 
                   ``Matthew A. Pucino Post Office''.
```
Exhibit 32.1


                         IDI Global, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of IDI Global, Inc. (the "Company") certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                                  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith
Date: November 18, 2004           __________________________________________
                                  Kevin R. Griffith
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 18, 2004           /s/ Steven D. Weatherly
                                  __________________________________________
                                  Steven D. Weatherly
                                  Principal Financial Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 419 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2027 

[Report No. 112–579] 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. CICILLINE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 9, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2027 RH

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton 

Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2027 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Sachuest 

6 Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy 

7 Pond Unit RI–06, Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’, included 

8 in the set of maps entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Bar9 rier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

10 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and 

11 relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Re12 sources System units in Rhode Island, is hereby replaced 

13 by another map relating to the units entitled ‘‘John H. 

14 Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point 

15 Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

16 Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’ and dated 

17 September 30, 2009. 

18 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

19 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

20 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

21 the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Re22 sources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 419 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2027 

[Report No. 112–579] 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal 

Rhode Island. Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit 

JULY 9, 2012 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2150

___________

Donroy Merrival, Jr. *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

Demetri Marlowe; Peggy Williams; *

Captain Wagner; Major Steven * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dolozal; David Walz, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 16, 2010

Filed: September 24, 2010 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Donroy Merrival, Jr., appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs. Following careful de novo review of the record, and

viewing the record in the light most favorable to Merrival, see Franklin v. Local 2 of
-2-

the Sheet Metal Workers Int’l Ass’n, 565 F.3d 508, 520 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of

review), we agree with the district court that Merrival failed to establish a triable issue

of material fact and that judgment was warranted as a matter of law, for the reasons

explained in the court’s thorough opinion. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit     32.2          Certification.

Certification  of  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of  UCELLIT.COM  INC.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C.  63.
I,  Mark  Epstein,  the  Chief  Accounting  Officer  of UCELLIT.COM INC. hereby
certify that UCELLIT.COM INC.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)
and  that  information  contained  in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the
financial  statements  contained  therein  fairly  represents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial condition and results of the operations of UCELLIT.COM
INC.


Date:  December  22,  2003
(signed)____________________
Mark  Epstein
/s/  Mark  Epstein
Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
UCELLIT.COM  INC.

 A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  UCELLIT.COM  INC.  and  will  be  retained by UCELLIT.COM INC. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>