alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2070 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2070

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
     prayed with the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2011

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Stivers, and Mr. Ryan of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
     prayed with the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall install in the area of the World War II Memorial 
        in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription 
        with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 
        the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day;
            (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install the plaque 
        or inscription referred to in paragraph (1); and
            (3) may accept and expend private contributions for the 
        cost of preparing and installing the plaque or inscription 
        referred to in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2259 

To require the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from operations 

in Libya, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2011 

Mr. HECK (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, and Mrs. MILLER

of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces 

from operations in Libya, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO WITHDRAW UNITED STATES 

4 ARMED FORCES FROM OPERATIONS IN 

5 LIBYA. 

6 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDING.—Congress finds that 

7 the President failed to articulate a clear national security 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2259 IH

1 imperative for United States military actions in support 

2 of operations in Libya. 

3 (b) WITHDRAWAL OF ARMED FORCES.—The Presi4 dent shall withdraw the United States Armed Forces from 

5 operations in Libya not later than 30 days after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

7 (c) LIMITATION ON FUNDS.—Funds available to the 

8 Department of Defense may not be used to conduct fur9 ther operations in Libya, except for purposes of providing 

10 for the continued withdrawal of the United States Armed 

11 Forces from operations in Libya. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

36 37 38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/27 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 2, 2009                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                |   |
| Seifi Ghasemi                         |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Segway V
Corp. for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, I, Rick Plotnikoff, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway V Corp. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended March 31, 2003, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway
          V Corp.

Dated:    December 4, 2003

Segway V Corp.


By:  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

As independent
petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our
Firms name and our Firms review of the proved oil and gas reserve quantities
as of December 31, 2007 in the following Form 10-Ks of Ridgewood Energy
Corporation:

Ridgewood
Energy K Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy O Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy P Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy Q Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy S Fund, LLC
Ridgewood Energy T Fund, LLC

|                |                               
|--------------- | ------------------------------
|                | /s/ Ryder
 Scott Company, L.P.
|                |                               
|                | Ryder Scott
 Company, L.P.    
|March 11,
 2008 |                               

---
cbbt_ex106.htm

EXHIBIT 10.6
  
 AMENDMENT #1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE
 ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 14, 2018
  
 THIS AMENDMENT #1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED ON February 14, 2018 (the “Amendment”) is entered into by and between Cerebain Biotech Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Crown Bridge Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).
  
 BACKGROUND
  
 A. The Company and Holder are the parties to that certain convertible promissory note originally issued by the Company to the Holder on February 14, 2018, in the original principal amount of $130,000.00 (the “Note”); and
  
 B. The Parties desire to amend the Note as set forth expressly below. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
  
 1. The maturity date of the First Tranche (as defined in the Note) shall be extended to September 2, 2019.
  
 2. This Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the Note. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Note, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
  
 [Signature page to follow]
 
 	 
	 1

	 
 
	 


  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
  
 	 Cerebain Biotech Corp.
	  
	 Crown Bridge Partners, LLC
	  

	   
	  
	  
	     
	  
	  

	 By: 
	  
	  
	 By:
		  

	 Name:
	 Eric Clemons
	  
	 Name:
	  
	  

	 Title:
	 Chief Executive Officer
	  
	 Title:
	  
	  


  
  
  	 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2070 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2070

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2012

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
     prayed with the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall install in the area of the World War II Memorial 
        in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription 
        with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 
        the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day;
            (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install the plaque 
        or inscription referred to in paragraph (1); and
            (3) may not use Federal funds to prepare or install the 
        plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph (1), but may 
        accept and expend private contributions for this purpose.

SEC. 3. COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

    Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, (commonly known as the 
``Commemorative Works Act'') shall not apply to this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 24, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
that each of the undersigned, being a director of IHS Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby constitutes and appoints Jerre L. Stead, Michael J. Sullivan, Heather Matzke-Hamlin, Stephen Green, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for the Companys fiscal year ended November 30,
2009, on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such other form as any such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable, any amendments thereto, and all additional amendments thereto, each in such form as they or
any one of them may approve, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the applicable Rules and Regulations adopted or issued
pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney has been signed below as of the 15th day of January, 2010 by the following
persons in the capacities indicated.



|                            |  |  |  |         
|--------------------------- |  |  |  | --------
|Signature                   |  |  |  | Title   
|                            |  | 
|/s/    C. Michael
Armstrong |  |  |  | Director
|C. Michael Armstrong        |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Steven A.
Denning    |  |  |  | Director
|Steven A. Denning           |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Ruann F. Ernst       |  |  |  | Director
|Ruann F. Ernst              |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Brian H. Hall        |  |  |  | Director
|Brian H. Hall               |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Roger Holtback       |  |  |  | Director
|Roger Holtback              |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Balakrishnan S.
Iyer |  |  |  | Director
|Balakrishnan S. Iyer        |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Michael Klein        |  |  |  | Director
|Michael Klein               |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Richard W.
Roedel    |  |  |  | Director
|Richard W. Roedel           |  |  |  |         
|                            |  | 
|/s/    Christoph v.
Grolman |  |  |  | Director
|Christoph v. Grolman        |  |  |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2257 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2257

   To waive the requirement that existing traffic signs meet minimum 
     retroreflectivity standards on or before the compliance dates 
           established by the Federal Highway Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2011

    Mr. Fleischmann (for himself and Mr. DesJarlais) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To waive the requirement that existing traffic signs meet minimum 
     retroreflectivity standards on or before the compliance dates 
           established by the Federal Highway Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINIMUM RETROREFLECTIVITY STANDARDS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNS.

    (a) Waiver.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, existing 
traffic control devices shall not be required to comply with the 
minimum retroreflectivity level standards set forth in section 2A.08 of 
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 
2009 Edition (incorporated by reference in part 655 of title 23, Code 
of Federal Regulations), on or before the compliance dates set forth in 
table I-2 of such Manual.
    (b) Exception.--Any traffic control device installed on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act shall meet the standards referred 
to in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUOC XUONG LUU,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

V. SINGH, Associate Warden; et al.,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-15506

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02783-LKKDAD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Quoc Xuong Luu appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15506

Luu contends that the district court erred in dismissing his petition as

untimely. To the extent that Luu argues that his prior 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

should toll the limitation period, this contention fails. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); see

also Fergusen v. Palmateer, 321 F.3d 820, 823 (9th Cir. 2003) (“section 2244(d)

does not permit the reinitiation of the limitations period that ended before the state

petition was filed”). The statute of limitations period for administrative decisions

is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(d), which requires filing within one year

from the date the administrative appeal was denied. See Shelby v. Bartlett, 391

F.3d 1061, 1065-66 (9th Cir. 2004) (limitation period began running day after

petitioner received notice of denial of appeal). Accordingly, Luu’s argument that

the AEDPA statute of limitations did not begin until after the resolution of his

§ 1983 action is without merit.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATIONS OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

# Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of American Energy Production, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 20, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Charles Bitters,
Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
their knowledge:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2)     The information contained in the
          Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles BittersCharles BittersPrincipal
Executive Officer

May 20, 2005

/s/ Charles
BittersCharles BittersPrincipal
Financial Officer

May 20, 2005   [A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American
Energy Production, Inc. and will be retained by American Energy Production, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1937

DR. GREG BATTERSBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. JOSEPH CAREW, in his individual and official capacities; 

DR. RICHARD HEAVNER, in his individual and official 

capacities; DR. BRIAN HUGHES, in his individual and official 

capacities; DR. JEANNE MCDANIEL-GREEN, in her individual and 

official capacities; DR. JOHN MCGINNIS, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. DAVID MRUZ, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. RALPH ROLES, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. HARVEY GARCIA, in his 

individual and official capacities; E. J. MERCER, in his 

individual and official capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:14-cv-00761-HMH)

Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: May 5, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Fein, BRUCE FEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Washington, D.C.; 

Donald L. Smith, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellant. 

Eugene H. Matthews, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, P.A., 
2

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Greg Battersby appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint by 

granting summary judgment for Defendants. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Battersby v. Carew, 

No. 8:14-cv-00761-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2192 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the meanstest presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve 

components of the Armed Forces and members of the National Guard 

who, after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or to perform 

a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2011 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. FORBES, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve components of the 

Armed Forces and members of the National Guard who, 

after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or 

to perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 

90 days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2192 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

3 Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF 

5 AMENDMENT. 

6 Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists 

7 Debt Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–438; 122 Stat. 

8 5000) is amended by striking ‘‘3-year’’ and inserting ‘‘7- 

9 year’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS