alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 29, 2006
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-2
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-2


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                              Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                              Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
#### Alfred Joe HENSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27300.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1955.

Pat Beene, Snyder, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, a trial by jury having resulted in the return of the following verdict:

*“We*the Jury find the Defendant, Alfred Joe Henson, Guilty as charged.

C. E. Ray

Foreman of the Jury

(Answer only in case you find the Defendant Guilty) We assess the punishment of the Defendant at: $50.00 We recommend that the jail sentence be commuted to a probation period of 6 months.

C. E. Ray

Foreman of the Jury”

This verdict was received, and became the basis of the judgment rendered by the court adjudging appellant guilty; ordering the recovery of a $50 fine and costs and adjudging that he be confined in jail for 3 days but ordering “that the said jail sentence be commuted to a probation period of six (6) months.”

The amendment of Art. 802, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., providing for a, compulsory jail term became effective August 25, 1953. Its validity, eliminating the provision for commutation and probation, was upheld in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106.

The offense for which appellant stands convictéd is alleged to have been committed on or about November 1, 1953. The court, in his charge, instructed the jury that the punishment to be assessed upon conviction should be “by confinement in the County Jail for not less than three (3) days nor more than two (2) years, and by a fine of not less than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) nor more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.-00),” and also informed the jury that “the presiding judge may in his discretion com*652¡mute the jail sentence to a probation period of not less than six months.”

The punishment to he assessed was for .the jury and the trial court was without authority to complete the verdict and assess a jail term in addition to the fine assessed by the jury. Nor was the verdict of the jury assessing a fine only sufficient to form the basis of a judgment of conviction, the punishment therein assessed not being in compliance with the court’s charge and the statute.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7574

FREEMAN L. HANKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DON WOOD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:07-hc-02046-H)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freeman L. Hankins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Freeman L. Hankins seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion to reconsider the denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

(2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong

and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is

likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-

38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Hankins has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny Hankins’ motion for authorization, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  August 23, 2017





PVH CORP.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212)-381-3500


Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company o


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

















---







ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION


On August 23, 2017 , PVH Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release to report the Company’s earnings for the second quarter 2017 , which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1.


The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d) Exhibits .


ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated August 23, 2017.






















































































---







SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





PVH CORP.





By: /s/ James W. Holmes


James W. Holmes


Senior Vice President and Controller





Date: August 23, 2017








---













Exhibit Index





ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated August 23, 2017.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, George Kadifa, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Corio, Inc. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Corio, Inc. and will be retained by Corio, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date: August 13, 2004 | /s/    George
Kadifa
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      |                     

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20061 Summary Calendar

BACH N. DANG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-5773) October 7, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dang sued Toshiba, his former employer , for wrongful termination in violation of the Texas Labor Code and the Americans With Disabilities Act. Toshiba moved for summary judgment which the district court granted. We have carefully reviewed the briefs,2

the reply brief, the record excerpts and relevant portions of the
summary judgment itself. For the reasons stated by the district
court in its Memora ndum and Order filed under date of January 7, 1997, we believe the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Toshiba. Accordingly, the Final Judgment entered under date of January 7, 1997, is

AFFIRMED
.
----

----

| Name                                                      | Jurisdiction    | Active/Not active |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------|
| Shamir Eyal Ltd.                                     | Israel          | Active            |
| Eyal Optics Holdings A.C.S. Ltd.                     | Israel          | Not active        |
| E. S. P. Optics Ltd.                                 | Israel          | Not active        |
| Aspect Optics Ltd                                    | Israel          | Not active        |
| Shamir Special Optical Products Ltd.                      | Israel          | Active       |
| Shamir Israel Optical Marketing Ltd.                      | Israel          | Active       |
| Shamir USA                                           | USA             | Active            |
| Shamir Insight, Inc.                                      | USA             | Active       |
| Shamir Optic GmbH                                         | Germany         | Active       |
| Inray Ltd.                                                | Israel          | Active       |
| Shamir Or Ltd.                                       | Israel          | Active            |
| Shamir Nederland B.V.                                | The Netherlands | Active            |
| Shamir Rx Italia S.r.l.                              | Italy           | Active            |
| Shamir France S.A.R.L.                               | France          | Active            |
| Shamir Optical Espana S.L.                           | Spain           | Active            |
| Shamir Portugal, LDA.                                     | Portugal        | Active       |
| Shamir Uk Limited                                         | UK              | Active       |
| Cambridge Optical Group Limited                      | UK              | Not active        |
| Altra Optik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.                   | Turkey          | Active            |
| Centro Integral Optico S.A. de C.V.                  | Mexico          | Active            |
| Shalens S.A. de C.V.                                 | Mexico          | Active            |
| K-T Optic Co., Ltd.                                  | Thailand        | Active            |
| Shamirlens (Thailand) Co., Ltd.                      | Thailand        | Active            |
| Shamir Australia (Pty) Ltd.                          | Australia       | Active            |
| Emerald Lens and Coating Technologies (Pty) Limited  | South Africa    | Active            |
| Optispeed Laboratory (PTY) Ltd.                      | South Africa    | Active            |
| Spherical Optics (Pty) Ltd.                          | South Africa    | Active            |

----

----
Exhibit 32.1          Certification.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC. pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C.
63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.
hereby certify that BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM INC.

Date:  November  12,  2003
(signed)  _______________________
Edward  Alexander
/s/  Edward  Alexander
Chief  Executive  Officer  of
BENTLEYCAPITALCORP.COM  INC.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                              /s/ Linda L. Perry
Dated: October 29, 2003       ________________________________________________
                              Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-KSB/A


Signet
International Holdings, Inc.


File
No.  000-51185







Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Signet International Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ernesto W. Letiziano, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      July 25, 2007
                By:  /s/  Ernesto W.
      LetizianoErnesto
      W. LetizianoChief
      Executive andChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Signet International Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Signet International
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
REFERENCE; AOT A32L003-14

APPENDIX 1

MLG SIDESTAY CARDAN PIN - CLEARANCES

Ensure that no gap 

exists between wing 

rear spar fitting lugs 

and their installed 

bush flanges (no bush 

migration)
NO. 07-06-0011-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JUNE 28, 2006

	______________________________

	MICHAEL SCOTT, TDCJ-ID NO. 683064, APPELLANT

	V.

	WARDEN WILLIAM WALKER, ET AL, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 92741-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Michael Scott perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing his action against appellees for want of prosecution.  The clerk’s record has been filed.  As no evidentiary hearings were conducted before the trial court, there is no reporter’s record.  After granting Scott two extensions of time to file his appellate brief, Scott’s brief was due to be filed by June 5, 2006.  Appellant had failed to file a brief by the June 5 deadline.  This court then notified Scott, by letter, that he must file a brief or a response reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief by June 26, 2006, or the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.  Scott has not filed a brief or a response.

	Due to Scott’s failure to comply with the directive of this court, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

						Mackey K. Hancock

	                         Justice
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Ed Alexander, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Proton  Laboratories,  Inc.,  certify  that  (i)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB/A  for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed by the Company with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  to  which  this Certification is an
Exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB  financial  statements  fairly  presents,  in  all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of Proton Laboratories, Inc.


Date:     November 14, 2007            /s/ Ed Alexander
          -----------------            -----------------------------------------
                                       Ed Alexander, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       President
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Proton  Laboratories,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Proton
Laboratories,  Inc.  and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its  staff  upon  request.
#### Lucian Clarence CARLEW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27544.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1955.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Jr.,- Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., ‘Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.