alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SMITH et al. v. D. A. SCHULTE, Inc., OF NEW YORK.

No. 345.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 28, 1937.

Rosenberg, Goldmark & Colin, of New York City (Max Freund and Paul A. Landsman, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Jerome Eisner and Ernst, Gale, Bernays & Falk, all of New York City (Henry I. Fillman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents only one variant upon Central Manhattan Properties, Inc., v. D. A. Schulte, Inc., of New York (C.C.A.) 91 F.(2d) 728, handed down herewith. The lessor, Schulco Company, Inc., mortgaged some of the parcels of land in question to the Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company, together “with the right to receive all rents due or to become due thereunder.” The debtor argues that this passed title to the rents out of the lessor. That is plainly untrue; the transfer was nothing more than a mortgage of future rents, and it is well settled in New -York that until the mortgagee gets a foreclosure receiver, or the equivalent, the rents belong to the mortgagor. Sullivan v. Rosson, 223 N.Y. 217, 119 N.E. 405, 4 A.L.R. 1400; In re Brose, 254 F. 664 (C.C.A.2); In re Kings County Real Estate Corp., 67 F.(2d) 895 (C.C.A.2); Walker v. Irving Trust Co., 73 F.(2d) 270 (C.C.A.2); Prudential Ins. Co. v. Liberdar Holding Co., 74 F.(2d) 50 (C.C.A.2); In re Humeston, 83 F.(2d) 187 (C.C.A.2).

Order reversed; claim allowed for fourteen-fifteenths of the subrents.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
      Abdoulline, as a Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
        Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.





By:/S/
                Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                AbdoullineCFODate:
                 May 20, 2008
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2158 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

14901 Adelfa Drive in La Mirada, California, as the ‘‘Wayne Grisham 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2011 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. BACA, Mr. BILBRAY, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. DAVIS

of California, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

HUNTER, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. 

DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. 

PELOSI, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. 

SPEIER, Mr. STARK, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. WAXMAN, and 

Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14901 Adelfa Drive in La Mirada, California, 

as the ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAYNE GRISHAM POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 14901 Adelfa Drive in La 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2158 IH

1 Mirada, California, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Wayne Grisham Post 

7 Office’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.315

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 160410 dated April 28, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 28, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated November 28, 2017 No. 731-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
#### Henry Glen AKARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27431.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder without malice; the punishment, one year’s confinement in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 

April 7, 2006 
 Mr. Robert D.
Kamphuis 
 President and CEO 
 Mayville Engineering Company,
Inc. 
 715 South Street 
 Mayville, WI 53050 

Dear Bob: 
 This letter will serve as a Memorandum of Agreement
between you and MEC regarding your plans to purchase real estate and construct a home in the Mayville area. 
 All of the Board members feel that it is
extremely important for you, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and your family, to reside in the Mayville area. The value to the Company of having its President in close proximity to Company headquarters is immeasurable and to encourage you
to proceed with your plans, MEC agrees to the following: 
 In the event MEC, or its successor, terminates your employment for any reason, or in the event
of your death or permanent disability while employed by MEC, MEC guarantees to you the return of the initial cost of such residence. For purposes hereof, it is agreed that permanent disability shall be the inability to perform on a full time basis
your normal duties for the corporation for at least six months as a result of mental or physical illness or injury. 
 You will provide MEC with a
documented summary of costs to establish such guaranteed return. In the event such guarantee is in excess of the fair market value, as determined by appraisal at the time of such termination, MEC will use a “tax gross-up” to cover any personal income tax liability you may have resulting from the guarantee. 
 The costs shall
include the initial costs (costs incurred within one year of the date of purchase of said real estate), and shall include the following: (1) purchase of vacant real estate, (2) installation of septic system, (3) installation of
well and well pump system, (4) fair and reasonable costs of residence construction and landscaping. 
 Prior to calling on MEC to make the required
guaranteed payment to you, you will have the option of attempting to sell the residence for an amount in excess of the guarantee if you feel the fair market value at that time is in excess of the guaranteed amount. If an acceptable offer
is not received during a 60-day period for an amount in excess of the guarantee, you will then be able to call on MEC to honor the guarantee. 












 This Memorandum of Agreement is subject to formal Board approval which I anticipate will take place at the
next MEC Board meeting. 
 Please indicate your approval by signing on the line provided below and returning a signed copy to me for the Company files. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MAYVILLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Carl N. Bachhuber

		 	Carl N. Bachhuber
		 	Chairman of the Board


 Approval: 
  

	
	 /s/ Robert D. Kamphuis

	Robert D. Kamphuis


  
 -2-
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1
(this “Amendment”), dated as of April 8, 2019, to the Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”),
dated as of April 8, 2016, by and between SWK Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a federally chartered trust company, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).
All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Rights Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
desires to amend the Rights Agreement to extend the Final Expiration Date;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 27 of the Rights Agreement, the Company and the Rights Agent may, from time to time, supplement or amend the Rights
Agreement; and


  


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 27 of the Rights Agreement, the Company has delivered to the Rights Agent the certificate of an officer of the
Company certifying that this Amendment complies with the terms of the Rights Agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. Amendment
of the Rights Agreement. The definition of “Final Expiration Date” in Section 1(m) of the Rights Agreement
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“Final
Expiration Date” means April 8, 2022.


 


2. Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by PDF or other electronic means) and each of such counterparts
shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.
A signature to this Amendment executed and/or transmitted electronically shall have the same authority, effect and enforceability
as an original signature.


 


3. Effectiveness.
This Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the date first written above. Except as amended hereby, the Rights Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect and shall be otherwise unaffected hereby. The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment
shall not, except as expressly provided herein, constitute a waiver or amendment of any provision of the Rights Agreement.


 


4. Governing
Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal substantive laws of the State of Delaware.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally
left blank; signature page follows.]




 


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	SWK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ WINSTON BLACK, III
	 	 	   Winston Black, III
	 	 	   Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	Computershare TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ KATHY HEAGERTY
	 	 	Name: Kathy Heagerty
	 	 	Title: Vice President & Manager
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2019

p0327 

# Order

Clerk March 27, 2019

158040

OLD ORCHARD BRANDS LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 158040

COA: 337463

Court of Claims: 16

- 000114

- MT

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2018 judgment

of the Court of Appeals is considere d, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|                                    |                                                                          |                                  |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                    | **American              Energy Production, Inc.**                             |
|                               |                                                                     |                             |
| Date: August              14, 2006 | By:                                                                 | /s/ Charles              Bitters |
|                                    | Charles              Bitters                                                  |
|                                    | Chief              Executive Officer and Chief Financial              Officer |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 9,  2009 | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant                               |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                          | **Douglas G.  Bryant*****Chief Financial Officer*** |

 

----
cool_ex1090.htm

EXHIBIT 10.90
  
 AMENDMENT
 TO THE $385,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED February 19, 2018
  
 The parties agree that $385,000 Promissory Note by and between Cool Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) and Lucas Hoppel (“Holder”) is hereby amended as follows:
  
 Maturity Date: The Maturity Date shall be extended to November 1st, 2018.
  
 Conversion Price: The Conversion Price in section 3(a)(ii) shall permanently be changed to equal $0.025 cents.
  
 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE $385,000 PROMISSORY NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
  
 Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated May 22nd, 2018 by signing below:
  
  	/s/ Tim Hassett	 	/s/ Lucas Hoppel	 
	 Tim Hassett 
	 	Lucas Hoppel	 
	 Cool Technologies, Inc.
 Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Re:   GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-2 (the "Trust") Asset-Backed
            Certificates, Series 2005-2, issued pursuant to the Pooling and
            Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005 (the "Pooling and
            Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., Deutsche
            Bank National Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"), NC Capital
            Corporation, as responsible party, New Century Mortgage Corporation
            ("New Century") and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as servicer
            (collectively with New Century, the "Servicers")
            --------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report"), and
      all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports (collectively with
      this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of periods included in
      the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicers under the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement for inclusion in the Reports is included in the
      Reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
      this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
      accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and
      except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicers has fulfilled its
      obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

5.    The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      Servicers' compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:    March 30, 2006


/s/ Michelle Gill
-------------------------------
Michelle Gill
Vice President
**EXHIBIT 15**
##### 



() Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Thomas M. Brandt, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.      May 14, 2004
Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
Sr. Vice President & CFO