alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 3.1

                     Articles of Incorporation, as Amended


                                   ARTICLE I

         The name of the corporation shall be SOUTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP, and
its mailing address and initial principal place of business shall be at 250
North Orange Avenue in the City of Orlando, Orange County, Florida.

                                   ARTICLE II

         The corporation shall be authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of a
single class of common stock, par value $1.00 per share.

                                  ARTICLE III

                               Board of Directors

         A.       Number of Directors. The business and affairs of the
corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a Board of Directors
consisting of such number of directors as shall be specified in the bylaws of
the corporation, as amended from time to time by the corporation's Board of
Directors.

         B.       Classification of Directors; Term of Office. The Board of
Directors shall be divided into three classes, each class consisting initially
of three directors, and designated as Class I, Class II and Class III,
respectively. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors pursuant to
Paragraph A of this Article III shall be so apportioned among the three classes
as to make all classes as nearly equal in number as possible. At the annual
meeting of the shareholders in 2001, directors designated in Class I shall be
elected for a term of one year, directors designated in Class II shall be
elected for a term of two years, and directors designated in Class III shall be
elected for a term of three years. At each annual meeting thereafter, directors
shall be elected for a term of three years. Except in cases where a director's
term has been terminated before its scheduled expiration by death, resignation,
disqualification or removal from office, each director shall continue to hold
office after the annual meeting at which his term is scheduled to expire until
his successor shall have been elected and shall have qualified to serve. No
decrease in the number of directors shall have the effect of shortening the
term of an incumbent director.

         C.       Vacancies. Any vacancy on the Board of Directors, including a
vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by
appointment by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a
quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
#### Peter BISAGNO et al. v. The OHIO OIL COMPANY, a Corporation, et al.

No. 1537.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1937.

D. W. Eaton, of Wichita, Kan., for appellants.

Joseph G. Carey, of Wichita, Kan., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS and BRATTON, Circuit Judges, and SYMES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction, at appellants’ costs.
#### J. Will STARK, Appellant, v. Porter D. BUTT et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 30, 1953.

Bell, Stagner & Orr, Bowling Green, for appellant.

Rodes K. Myers, Leland H. Logan, Bowling Green, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment for defendants in action for breach of rental contract and conversion of personal property.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam
Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 1.
 The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
 The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Adam
 WassermanName: Adam WassermanTitle: Chief
 Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officerDated:
 February 11, 2010 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0302

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BRANDON JAMES LEWIS TOLLIE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Deborah Kim Christopher, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2022

02/09/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0302
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Molecular
Evolution, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



    Date: August 5, 2003          By:  /s/ William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chairman of the Board
#### CADDEN v. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 22, 1954.

Vincent J. Hargadon, Louisville, for petitioner.

Macauley L. Smith, Louisville, J. Walter Clements, Louisville, amicus curiae, for respondent.

*72DUNCAN, Justice.

This original action seeks a writ of mandamus to require the respondent, Judge of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Chancery-Branch, First Division, to enter an order requiring the payment to petitioner of alimony, pending an appeal to this Court from an order of the lower court denying divorce and alimony. The writ will not lie for two reasons.

We have many times written that our power to control the action of inferior jurisdictions under Section 110 of the Kentucky Constitution is limited to cases in which the inferior court is acting without jurisdiction, or is acting erroneously within its jurisdiction and great and irreparable injury will result therefrom, and the petitioner is without legal remedy by appeal or otherwise.

In the present action, the petitioner has a complete and adequate remedy. On an appeal from a judgment refusing alimony, the Court of Appeals may award maintenance, pending the appeal. Napier v. Napier, 186 Ky. 558, 217 S.W. 683. Until the transcript of the record on appeal has been filed in this Court, the circuit court has jurisdiction to make the award. After the filing of the transcript, this Court alone may make such an allowance. Hertel v. Edwards, 201 Ky. 456, 257 S.W. 36. After the transcript is filed in this Court, the petitioner may move this Court for temporary alimony, pending the appeal.

Petitioner insists that she is without funds to pay for the preparation of the transcript. Respondent’s answer discloses that there is a fund presently on deposit with the receiver of the Jefferson Circuit Court in which petitioner has been adjudged an interest, her share being approximately $4,000. Respondent represents that after the cost of the transcript has been ascertained, he will direct its payment out of this fund.

A second and equally impelling reason for denying the writ is the rule, which we have consistently followed, to the effect that mandamus will not lie to control the exercise of a judicial discretion. Although the writ may be invoked to set a court in motion, it cannot be used as a means of controlling the result. Hargis v. Swope, 272 Ky. 257, 114 S.W.2d 75. The allowance of alimony pendente lite, or pending an appeal, is addressed to the sound discretion of the court. Wills v. Wills, 168 Ky. 35, 181 S.W. 619. We have no right to control such discretion in an original action.

The motion for a writ of mandamus is denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350 We, William R. Cruz and Ralph L. Cruz, Co-Chairmen of the Board and
Co-Chief Executive Officers of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to our
respective knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation Group, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
TradeStation Group, Inc. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. August 9, 2004
    
    /s/ William R. CruzDate
    
    William R. Cruz
Co-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Ralph L. CruzDate
    
    Ralph L. Cruz
Co-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a director of IHS Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Jerre L. Stead, Michael J. Sullivan, Heather Matzke-Hamlin, Stephen Green, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for the Company's fiscal year
ended November 30, 2008, on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such other form as any such attorney-in-fact may deem
necessary or desirable, any amendments thereto, and all additional amendments thereto, each in such form as they or any one of them may approve, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the applicable Rules
and Regulations adopted or issued pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature

Title* C. Michael Armstrong

Director* Steven A. Denning

Director* Ruann F. Ernst

Director* Brian H. Hall

Director* Roger Holtback

Director* Balakrishnan S. Iyer

Director* Michael Klein

Director* Richard W. Roedel

Director* Christoph v. Grolman

Director


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

I, George Kadifa, certify that: 

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Corio, Inc.;
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
- The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

- The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.
| | Exhibit 15
| | ----------

June 8, 2004



Stockholders and Board of Directors

Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in

(i) Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-73803), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen
Corporation Employee Savings and Retirement Plan,

(ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-50841) and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59602), each of which relate to the
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

(iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59101), which relates to the Voluntary Investment Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation
(Crystal Brands Division),

(iv) Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-72959), Post Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-64564), and Post Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-47910), each of which relate
to the 1973 Employee's Stock Option Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation,

(v) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38698), Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-24057) and
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-60793), each of which relate to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan,

(vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-29765), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan

(vii) Registration Statement (Form S-4, No. 333-57203), which relates to the 9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008,

(viii) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-41068), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan,

(ix) Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-105218), which relates to the issuance of stock of Phillips-Van Heusen to the selling
stockholders of Calvin Klein, Inc. and certain related companies,

(x) Registration Statement (Form S-4, No. 333-108329), which relates to the 8 1/8% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2013, and

(xi) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-109000), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan

of our report dated May 19, 2004, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Phillips-Van Heusen
Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q for the thirteen week period ended May 2, 2004.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our reports are not a part of the registration statements or post-effective
amendments prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



| | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| | -----------------

New York, New York
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10104

Summary Calendar

JAMES K. CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

L. SERRANO, Administrator,

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CV-387

Before BARKSDALE, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, James K. Chambers challenges the dismissal of his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action against Avalon Correction Services’ employee Loy

Serrano; the dismissal was based on Chambers’ failure to comply with the 

court’s order to file an amended complaint and, alternatively, his failure to 

state a claim. On appeal, his brief does not address the court’s bases for 

dismissing his claims. When an appellant fails to identify any error in the 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10104 Document: 00513623437 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2016
No. 16-10104

2

court’s analysis, it is as if he had not appealed that issue. Brinkmann v. Dallas 

Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Although pro se

briefs are afforded liberal construction, contentions must be briefed in order to 

be preserved. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224–25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because 

Chambers fails to do so, his claims are abandoned.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-10104 Document: 00513623437 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/04/2016
Exhibit 5.1   PHILLIPS-VANHEUSENCORPORATION  200 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10016-3903  (212) 381-3500  MARK D. FISCHER
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL
AND SECRETARYDID:  (212) 381-3509
FAX:  (212) 381-3970
E-mail:  markfischer@pvh.com  July 1, 2009   Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 Gentlemen: I refer to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the Registration Statement) filed on even date by Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of up to an aggregate of 4,472,397 shares of the Companys common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Common Stock), to be issued in connection with the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan). I have made such examination as I have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.  Based upon such examination, it is my opinion, that, when the Registration Statement has become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and when the shares of Common Stock to be issued are sold and paid for in the manner described in the Plan, the Common Stock so issued will have been validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. My opinion is limited to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.  This opinion is given as of the date hereof and I assume no obligation to advise you of changes that may hereafter be brought to my attention. I hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. Very truly yours,  /s/ Mark D. Fischer  Mark D. Fischer
Exhibit 32


     CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Philip Hester, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Deborah F. McLeod, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.






August 13, 2004                    /s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                   -------------------------
                                   J. Philip Hester, Sr., President and CEO
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)




August 13, 2004                    /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
                                   ---------------------
                                   Deborah F. McLeod, CFO
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)