alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|                 |  |                                                                 
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|November 7, 2007 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                                         
|Date             |  | David H. Fleischman                                             
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
Appeals Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00742-CV

NO. 14-18-00743-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.W. JR, A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 246th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2017-48742 & 2017-48742A 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

These accelerated appeals arise from final decrees in suits in which 

termination of the parent-child relationship was at issue. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 

§ 109.002(a-1) (West 2014 & Supp. 2018). The appellant in each appeal is the Texas 

Department of Family and Protective Services (the Department).

The Department’s brief was due October 11, 2018. We extended the due date 

to November 12, 2018, on the Department’s motion. We noted that no further 

extensions would be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. No brief or motion 

for extension of time to file the brief was filed. 
2

On November 13, 2018, the court ordered the Department to filed a brief by 

November 26, 2018. We cautioned that if the Department failed to comply with our 

order, we would dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). No brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed.

Therefore, the appeals are DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Wise.
Opinion filed August 29, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00073-CR

__________

CHRISTOPHER GALINDO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 24325A

M E M O R A N D U M C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

Because I believe that the enhanced photographs are cumulative of other 

photographs in evidence and because I believe that a proper predicate was not laid 

for their admissibility, I would hold that the trial court erred when it admitted the 

enhanced photographs. However, on this record, I would hold that the error is 
2

nonconstitutional error and that, in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the 

error did not affect Appellant’s substantial rights. Therefore, I concur in the result.

MIKE WILLSON

JUSTICE

August 29, 2014

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2244 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 67 Castle Street in Geneva, New York, as 

the ‘‘Corporal Steven Blaine Riccione Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2244 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL STEVEN BLAINE RICCIONE POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 67 Castle Street in Geneva, New 

5 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Ste6 ven Blaine Riccione Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Steven 

11 Blaine Riccione Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Senior Judge Hugh H. Bownes participated in the orig ina l

hearing and disposition of the this case but retired on September 1, 2003, prior to the fil ing of the petition for rehearing, and passedaway on November 5, 2003. T he r emaining members of the panel comprise a quorum for the issuance of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit
Nos. 02-1139, 02-1340, 02-1465 LUIS A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v. ROBERTO VERA MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas; MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS; IRMA M. GONZALEZ DELGADO, Individually

and as Personnel Director of Adjuntas, Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. Senior District Judge ]
Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Bownes, * Senior Circuit Judge , and Lipez, Circuit Judge . ORDER OF COURT
December 5, 2003-2-

On September 9, 2003 the defendant-appellants filed a Petition for Rehearing in their individual capacity and a Petition for Rehearing and/or Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc in their official capa city. As is explained herein, we grant the petition for a panel rehearing, which moots the suggestion for rehearing en banc. In our opinion of August 21, we stated that our review of the legal issues in the case was handicapped by the defendants' failure to produce transcripts of the defense portion of the trial. Specifically, we were unable to review fully the challenged evidentiary rulings, claims of inappropriate participation of the trial court, and the sufficiency of the evidence challenge. In their petition for rehearing, defen d ants explained that theyordered the transcripts from the court reporter, paid for the tr ansc ripts, and later received a full set of transcripts. Furthermore, both parties referred to the full set of transcripts in their b riefs. Upon further investigation, we determined that the transcripts were never properly filed with us through a combination of miscues by the defendants, the court reporter, and the circuit court clerk's office. Without assigning responsibility to any one party for the absence of the transcripts, w e decide d that we would review the now available transcripts in deciding the issues to which they relate. Having done so, we find nothing in the full record that requires us to alter the ruling in our opinion filed on August 21.-3-

Bythis order, we grant the petition for rehearing, withdraw our opinion filed August 21, and file a revised opinion.

By the Court,

______________________________ Richard Cushing Donovan, Clerk

[CertifiedCopies to Hon. Jamie Pieras and Ms. Frances De Moran, Clerk, U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico. Copies to: Mr. Mahony, Ms. Templeton, Ms. Martinez-Fortier, Mr. Garay, Mr. Falto-Cruz, Mr. Ortiz-Alvarez, Mr. Martinez-Luciano, Ms. Zabala-Galarza, Mr. Rivera-Alvarez, Mr. Svonkin, Mr. Guzman, Mr. VillaresSarmiento, Mr. Roldan-Gonzalez, Mr. Pagan-Rivera, and Mr. Emmanuelli-Huertas.]
#### J. H. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28555.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 31, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of • record ora-appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*837PER CURIAM.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty, is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.'

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### COLE v. STATE.

No. 26861.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for-appellant.

Plenry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 60 days in jail and' a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
##### 



() Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Maurice B. Tosé, certify that:  a)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc.;b)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;c)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;d)
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  e)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. /s/ Maurice B. Tosé           May 14, 2004
Maurice B. Tosé
Chairman, CEO and President
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Molecular Evolution, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.

William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2003
#### ALLEN v. STATE.

No. 23610.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is death.

There are no bills of exceptions nor any objections to the court’s charge in the record. The indictment appears to be in due form. Consequently, the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

The record reflects that the State proved the following facts: Mrs. Josephine Enna, the wife of the deceased, testified that her husband,- Joe Enna, owned a package store located one door from the corner of Lat-timer and Dawson Streets in the City of Dallas, in Dallas County, Texas; that on the afternoon of October 15, 1946, between the hours of 4 and 5 p. m., she went to the store to keep her husband company until closing time for the night; that about 7 p. m. the defendant, Oscar Allen, came into the -place of business and called for a pint of gin. Mr. Joe Enna handed him the gin, but appellant did" not have enough money to pay for it. At this juncture, his brother, Charlie Allen, came into the liquor store with two $1 bills to pay for the gin; that when Mr. Enna placed the money into the cash register, appellant drew a pistol, pointed it at Enna, and commanded him to give him, appellant, the money, and fired one shot, and then both the defendant and his brother fled from the scene of the shooting. The shot which appellant fired at Enna struck him a little to the right and below the. right nipple, -passed through the body and made its exit near the spine, which resulted in the death of Enna a few days later.

Appellant and his brother Charlie were arrested and charged with the murder. Appellant made a voluntary confession in writing after he was duly warned as required by law in which he admitted that he shot Joe Enna at the time and place in question. Appellant was definitely identified by Mrs. Enna as the person who fired the shot at her husband and inflicted the *169ratal wound. He did not testify or offer-any affirmative defense.

We deem the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Molecular
Evolution, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

              Date: November 4, 2003      By: /s/ William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

|                                       |                                         |                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                              |
|                                  |                                    |                                 |
| Date: March                  18, 2006 | By:                                | /s/ Charles                  Bitters |
|                                       | Charles                  Bitters             |
|                                       | Principal                  Executive Officer |

|                                         |                                                |                                        |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                                     |
|                                    |                                           |                                   |
| Date: March                    18, 2006 | By:                                       | /s/ Charles                    Bitters |
|                                         | Charles                    Bitters                  |
|                                         | Principal                    Financial Officer |

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian T. Beckwith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Peoples Educational
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

 /s/ Brian T. Beckwith
----------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       26
Exhibit 23

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-128202 and No. 333-134249 on Forms S-8 and the Registration Statement No. 333-146121 and 333-157631 on Forms S-3 of Parke Bancorp, Inc. of our report, dated March 27, 2009, relating to our audit of the 2008 consolidated financial statements of Parke Bancorp, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is            incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Parke Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

 

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

May 4, 2009

 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International –

an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.