alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                            |   | State      or Other   |   |            |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|-----------------|
|                            |   | Jurisdiction      of  |   | Percentage      |
| Subsidiaries                    |   | Incorporation         |   | Ownership       |
|                            |   |                  |   |            |
| Parke      Bank                 |   | New      Jersey       |   | 100%            |
| Parke      Capital Trust I      |   | Delaware              |   | 100%            |
| Parke      Capital Trust II     |   | Delaware              |   | 100%            |
| Parke      Capital Trust III    |   | Delaware              |   | 100%            |
|                            |   |                  |   |            |
| Subsidiaries      of Parke Bank |   |                  |   |            |
|                            |   |                  |   |            |
| Parke      Capital Markets      |   | New      Jersey       |   | 100%            |
| Farm      Folly, LLC            |   | New      Jersey       |   | 100%            |
| 44      Business Capital LLC    |   | New      Jersey  |   |   51% |
|     1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Segway IV Corp., Inc. |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        October 27, 2009                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                         |
| /s/      Donny Smith                     |
| Donny      SmithPresident,      Secretary andDirector                                                                                   |
Record of Communication from calls o n pretreatment with Morgan Ci ty , LA and R egio n 6 o n Shreveport, LA
On 2/ 23110/2 0 1 0 , I ta lk ed to Murphy Arcemont by telephone regarding Morgan City' s experience with oil and gas wastes und er it s pretreatment program . In the late 1990s a company, En vironment Treatment Team (ETT), received LA DNR permits to treat oil and gas extraction was t e and dispose of the waste water through Morgan City's pretreatment pr ogram as a cent ra li zed waste treatment fac ili ty. Acco rdin g to Murphy , the company was taking inland o il and gas waste i n the beginning, and it was run b y a local businessman. At some po int (no spec ifi c date was given) man age m e nt of the company was don e by so meon e fro m Baton Rouge, LA, and the city started hav in g problems. The first issue was that drilling fluids containing zi nc bromide were trea ted. The pretreatment program r e quired monthly monitoring for z in c and didn't pick up th e increas e d zinc loading until it s howed up in the sludge. Mo rgan City required more frequent moni torin g and gave ETT a choice of a fine or cleaner up the contaminati o n . ETT cleaned up the contamination. ETT next started accepting waste that was hi gh in c hl orides. Morgan City required monitoring for c hlorid es and t hen install at ion of co ntro ls that shut down ETTs pump w h en chlorides became high. S pikes in chlorides still persisted and ETT was event ually taken offli ne . Murphy sa id that the plant has been abandoned for several years. On 2/23/10, I a.lso talked to Ted Palit (R6 ) regardin g pretreatm e nt of oi l and gas waste at Shreveport, LA. A CWT nam e d Ark la was accep ting oil and gas was te for trea tment and previously sent the waste to Shreveport's POTW under the pre treatm ent program . Acco rdin g to Ted, the city was finding " black " waste fl owi ng to the plant. Shreveport personnel traced th e waste to Arkla; however, Arkla's effluent qu ickly changed to clear, freshwater, w h en c it y pe rsonnel came to inspect. This facility has since been bought by CCS Energy Services. The previous owner has no conn ec tions with the facility, and a n y treatment operati ons are pending process changes in the facility. Ted said that the POTW was having prob l e ms with the bio l ogical treat m e nt sys tem when chlorides became as high as 30,000 ppm.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6895]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 16376]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Landmark Earth Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Leggett & Platt, Inc. 
of Carthage, Missouri, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 
6,383,548, ``COBY PRODUCTS AND A PROCESS FOR THEIR MANUFACTURE,'' 
issued on May 7, 2002.

DATES: Comments must be received within thirty (30) days of the date of 
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Landmark Earth Solutions, 
Inc., a subsidiary of Leggett & Platt, Inc. of Carthage, Missouri, has 
submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) 
days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research 
Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-6895 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                                                               |              |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                          | SEGUSO                HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                               |
|                     |                                                                                                          |         |
| April                14, 2008 | By:                                                                                                      | /s/ Robert Seguso |
|                          | Robert                Seguso Chief                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial                  Officer |

----
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


_____________________________


FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934











Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


December 9, 2013








PVH CORP.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212)-381-3500


Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---










ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION


On December 9, 2013 , PVH Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release to report the Company’s earnings for the third quarter 2013 , which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1.


The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d) Exhibits .


ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated December 9, 2013.











---




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





PVH CORP.





By: /s/ Bruce Goldstein


Bruce Goldstein


Senior Vice President and Controller





Date: December 9, 2013











---




Exhibit Index





ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated December 9, 2013.
#### TRIMBLE et al. v. TRIMBLE et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 13, 1953.

Wine & Venters, Pikeville, for appellants.

Stratton & Stratton, Pikeville, for ap-pellee Alvery Potter.

J. Smith Hays, Jr., Winchester, guardian ad *litem.*

WADDILL, Commissioner.

Appellants brought this suit pursuant to Section 491a of the Civil Code of Practice (Now KRS 389.040) to obtain the court’s approval of a .contemplated sale of the remainder interest in a tract of land in Clark County. Appellants are the life tenants and contingent remaindermen and appellees are infant vested remaindermen. Also an appellee is Alvery Potter, with whom the life tenants entered into a contract for sale of the land.

The court dismissed appellants’ petition on the ground that the proposed sale was not in the best interest of all concerned as it is required to be by the language of Section 491a of the Civil Code of Practice.

We must affirm the judgment dismissing appellants’ petition. In their petition appellants asked the court to approve a private sale of the property. This Court has held in Vittitow v. Keene, 265 Ky. 66, 95 S.W.2d 1083, that a sale of property under Section 491a must be a public sale, and that the court may not give its approval to a private sale.

For this reason the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2024 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2024

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures 
governing the closure or consolidation of postal branches and stations 
   shall be the same as those applicable in the case of post offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2011

 Mr. Butterfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures 
governing the closure or consolidation of postal branches and stations 
   shall be the same as those applicable in the case of post offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Post Office Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROCEDURES RELATING TO POSTAL CLOSINGS AND 
              CONSOLIDATIONS.

    Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) For purposes of subsections (a)(3) and (d)--
            ``(1) the term `post office' includes a branch, station, or 
        other facility which--
                    ``(A) is operated by the Postal Service; and
                    ``(B) provides services to persons described in 
                paragraph (2); and
            ``(2) any reference in subsection (d) to the persons served 
        by a post office shall include any postal patrons receiving 
        mail delivery services from such post office, residents within 
        any ZIP code served by such post office, postal patrons having 
        post office boxes at such post office, and the relevant local 
        government officials (as defined under regulations of the 
        Postal Service).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing by AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the
“Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jervis B.
Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)          
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)          
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:    July
      1, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Jervis B PerkinsJervis
      B. PerkinsPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### NICHOLS v. NICHOLS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 23, 1953.

L. D. Bruce, Russell, for appellant.

A. R. Imes, Ashland, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

Roy and Majil Marie Nichols were married in 1947. They have a son, who was four years of age when Mrs. Nichols instituted this divorce action. Mrs. Nichols had an 11-year old son by a previous marriage. Mr. Nichols had been married three times previously. In his counterclaim Mr. Nichols sought a divorce and custody of their child. The trial resulted in a judgment granting Mrs. Nichols a divorce and custody of the child; an allowance of $40 per month for the child’s support; and an allowance of $25 per month to Mrs. Nichols as alimony. On this appeal Mr. Nichols asks that he be given custody of the child and relieved of the payment of alimony.

Mr. Nichols was a C. & O. yard brakeman. He earned approximately $300 a month. It appears, however, that at the time of the trial he had recently undergone surgery for hardening of the arteries. He said that the doctors told him he would not be able to go back to work for a period of six to eleven months. He was receiving disability and unemployment payments amounting to $230 a month. Mrs. Nichols worked from time to time as a waitress.

 The marital relations of the parties were none too pleasant, and Mrs. Nichols had left home on two or three occasions. Suffice it to say that our examination of the record convinces us that neither party was wholly without fault. It is our opinion, however, that the chancellor properly awarded Mrs. Nichols a divorce. We think it was proper also for her to be awarded custody of the child. She appears to be a good mother and was living in the home of her sister at the time of the trial. The award of $25 per month to Mrs. Nichols as alimony is low enough. While the sufficiency of the award of $40 per month for the child’s support is not in issue, that award, too, is in reason.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0660 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. JOSHUA DUANE WOLFBLACK,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Following entry of this Court’s August 6 , 202 4 Opinion vacating the Appellant revocation sentence, Joshua Wolfblack has moved for immediate remittitur. Mr. Wolfblack’s attorney Pete Wood represents that the State of Montana does not oppose this motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that remittitur shall issue immediately.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 8 2024

08/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0660
SCWC-12-0000962 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. LETITIA HARTER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000962; CR. NO. 11-1-1063) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Letitia Harter’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on March 24, 2014, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 7, 2014. Alen M. Kaneshiro for Petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /S/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000962 07-MAY-2014 09:50 AM
##### 



(TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LOGO) Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Thomas M. Brandt, Jr, certify that:  a)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc.;b)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;c)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;d)
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  e)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. December 8, 2004
    /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Sr. Vice President & CFO