alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **GENERAL (Details)**           | 3 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Fiscal Period [Line Items]**  |           |
| Fiscal Year Minimum Week Period | 1 year         |
| Fiscal Year Maximum Week Period | 1 year 7 days  |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Fiscal Period [Line Items]
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_FiscalPeriodLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Maximum weeks comprising the Company's fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to February 1.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_FiscalYearMaximumWeeksPeriod**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**us-types:durationStringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Minimum weeks comprising the Company's fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to February 1.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_FiscalYearMinimumWeekPeriod**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**us-types:durationStringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Exhibit 32.1

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

August 21, 2006
(signed)
         ---------------------
/s/Edward Alexander
Edward Alexander
Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 22, 2020

NO. 03-19-00908-CV

Francis Campone and Sai Temple of Spiritual Healing, Inc., Appellants

v.

Steven Kline and Phaedra Kline, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the summary judgment order signed by the trial court on December 10, 

2019. Francis Campone and Sai Temple of Spiritual Healing, Inc. have filed a motion for 

rehearing, and having reviewed the motion, the record, and the parties’ arguments, we grant the 

motion for rehearing. The Court therefore withdraws its opinion and judgment from August 13, 

2020 and substitutes the following opinion and judgment in their place. The Court holds that 

there was no reversible error in the portion of the court’s summary judgment as to Sai Temple’s

defamation claim and affirms that portion of the trial court’s summary judgment. The Court 

further holds that there was reversible error in the remainder of the court’s summary judgment 

and reverses the remainder of the trial court’s summary judgment. The Court remands 

Campone’s defamation claim against Steven Kline arising from the Michelson conversation and 
the Klines’ claim for attorney’s fees under the TCPA for further proceedings in the trial court.

Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
|   | Exhibit 23.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

McGladrey & Pullen

Certified Public Accountants

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-133110 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 3330133108 on Form S-8 of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2007 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American CareSource Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 

 

| By: /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| McGladrey & Pullen, LLP         |   |

Des Moines, Iowa

April 2, 2007

 

 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is an independent member firm of RSM International,

an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 18, 2009 /s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.35


 





CFO Services Agreement


 


This CFO Services Agreement is entered into
as of April 1, 2018 between Jesus Quintero (“Quintero”), and Massroots, Inc. (the “Company”).
Quintero hereby agrees to serve as Chief Financial Officer of Massroots, Inc. for a period of one year, with automatic renewal
every April 1, 2018, unless written notice is provided by the Company to Quintero 90 days before renewal.


 


The compensation will be paid monthly at the
beginning of each month, at a rate of USD $6,000.00. Unless otherwise directed by Quintero, all payments shall be issued in the
name of JDE Development LLC and sent to:


 


JDE Development LLC


16860 SW 1st Street, Pembroke
Pines, FL 33027.


 


There will be no other fees or charges by Quintero
to the Company other than pre-approved direct, third party reimbursements for costs, and pre-approved travel and related expenses.


 


Specific responsibilities of Quintero for the Company shall include:


1. Review and analysis of the historical accounting
records


2. Implementation of appropriate internal financial
controls


3. Interacting with the Company’s internal
accounting staff


4. Liaison with the Company’s auditor
and securities attorney regarding filing and reporting


requirements


5. Preparation of financial statements including
footnotes for 10Q and 10K reporting


6. Preparation of analysis of operations as
may be required in regulatory filings


7. Preparation as may be required of forecasts
and budgets.


8. Final review and signing of financial statements
and regulatory filings


9. Maintaining the books and records and U.S.
account(s) for the Company


10. Meeting with Company management and visits to the
Company’s facilities as may be required.


11. Participation at investor meetings and conferences
as may be required


12. Responding to phone calls from the financial
community and investors


 


 


Quintero and the Company agree that the
performance, compensation, and time commitment by Quintero shall be reviewed and agreed upon on an annual basis. Quintero
shall be treated as a contract worker.


 


Quintero shall be entitled to reimbursement
for appropriate business expenses, as well as travel and related expenses.


 


This CFO Services Agreement shall be in force
until such time as a formal Employment Agreement is entered into by Quintero and the Company.


 


Either Quintero or the Company may terminate
this Agreement provided they give ninety (90) days written notice of the termination. Upon termination by the Company, Quintero
shall be entitled to recover from the Company, including, but not limited to, payment for all work performed through the date of
termination.


 


In the event of any dispute between the parties
arising out of or relating to this Agreement, said dispute shall be governed the laws of the State of Florida without reference
to its conflict of law rules.


 


Agreed to:


 





	/s/ Jesus M. Quintero 	 	April 1, 2019 	 	/s/ Isaac Dietrich	 	April 1, 2019
	Jesus M Quintero 	 	Date  	 	Isaac Dietrich, CEO 	 	Date
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0395 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-007-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard Interim Chief Financial Officer   Date:  August 19, 2008
Exhibit 99.4

[KPMG LOGO]


                KPMG LLP
                Suite 2000
                355 South Grand Avenue
                Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568


                         Independent Accountants' Report
           Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

The Board of Directors
New Century Mortgage Corporation

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Assertion - Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, that New
Century Mortgage Corporation (the Company), complied with minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that New Century Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and is fairly stated, in all material respects.


                                          /s/ KPMG LLP


March 15, 2006


           KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
             member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
<PAGE>

[LOGO]


                              Management Assertion

           Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, New Century Mortgage Corporation
has complied, in all material respects, with the minimum servicing standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA), Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP). As of and for this same period,
New Century Mortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and an errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $45,000,000 and $20,000,000 respectively.


New Century Mortgage Corporation


/s/ Brad A. Morrice                             3/15/06
-------------------------------------           --------------
Brad A. Morrice                                 Date
President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Patti M. Dodge                              3/15/06
-------------------------------------           --------------
Patti M. Dodge                                  Date
EVP and Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LIBERTY POWER CORP., LLC,

Appellant,

v.

SAMUEL KATZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3144

[December 3, 2020]

Appeal and cross appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE 18017922 (08).

Michael R. Borasky of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for appellant.

Stephen J. Bagge of Stephen J. Bagge, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, KLINGENSMITH, JJ., and NUTT, JAMES, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | the                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December                31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the                information contained in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the                fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10612

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

CARLOS GLASPIE,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-173-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Carlos Glaspie, federal prisoner # 27622-177, appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Glaspie

pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute in excess of 50 grams of cocaine base

(crack) and to being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to a

term of 235 months in prison on the drug count and to a term of 120 months on

the firearm count, the terms to run concurrently. Glaspie sought the reduction

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-10612 Document: 00511276985 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
No. 08-10612

based on amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that reduced the offense

levels for crimes involving crack cocaine.

Liberally construed, Glaspie argues that his sentence is greater than

necessary to achieve the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because the court gave

inadequate weight to his post-incarceration conduct and overstated the

seriousness of his offense, his criminal history, and his potential danger to

society. The decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) is

reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th

Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3462 (2010). Under that standard, we may not

substitute our judgment for that of the sentencing court. See Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The district court did not abuse its discretion but

gave due consideration to the motion as a whole and the § 3553(a) factors. See

United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v.

Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (affirming the denial of a §

3582(c)(2) motion where “implicitly, the district court considered at least some

of the factors set forth in § 3553(a)”).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and its alternate request for an

extension of time in which to file a brief is DENIED.

2

Case: 08-10612 Document: 00511276985 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
#### YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 26549.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1953.

'See also 261 S.,W.2d836.

Reynold M. Gardner, Amarillo, for appellant.

Floyd H. Richards, Dist. Atty., Dalhart, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The conviction is for violation of Article 535c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, fifteen years in the penitentiary.

The record shows that the overt act of exposure of his private parts here relied upon is the same act thereafter relied upon for conviction in our Cause No. 26,606, 261 S.W.2d 836. The indictment here charges such indecent exposure to one of the two boys present on the occasion, while the subsequent conviction was upon an indictment alleging such exposure to the other boy. The State may obtain but one final conviction based upon this single overt act.

Also here, as in our Cause No. 26,606, testimony was offered of extraneous offenses for tire purpose of showing lascivious intent.

Appellant was without counsel upon his trial, and though his objection to the testimony as to extraneous crimes is meager, we have reached the conclusion that by reason of the admission of such evidence appellant has not received a fair and impartial trial; and it is our duty to reverse for the error mentioned.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
noPRKi^OH b 

# Eri c Schertzin g Ingha mCount y Treasure r - = ? :^. ^ o I ; U

U

Joh n C . Schlinke r Chie f Deput y Treasure r (517 ) 676-723 5 jschlinker@mgham.or g Courthous e P.O . Bo x 21 5 Mason , M I 48854-021 5 (517 ) 676-722 0 eschertzing@ingham.or g February 27 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t

Facilit y U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloo r Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Su n Country slo t

exemptio n Docke t

FAA-2012-008 9 T o Who mIt

May Concern : 1 a mwritin g i n stron g support o f th e Su n Country flight

fro mMinneapoli s t o Washingto n D C vi a Lansin g Michigan . Thi s i s th e mos t usefii l busines s flight

w e enjo y fromou r

Capita l City Internationa l Airport . Th e presenc e o f Michiga n Stat e University , Genera l Motor s an dnumerou s insuranc e companie s mak e thi s servic e eve n mor e powerful . Nationa l effort s t o maintai n airport s i n region s o f 500,00 0 populatio n ar e areaso n thi s servic e mus t b e maintained . Wit

h amajo r hu b airport

i n Detroi t

th e servic e that

make s sens e outstat e i s t o rea l destinations . I amhopefu l that th e airport

wil l b e abl e t o ad dservic e t o Ne w Yor k City i n th e future . A s InghamCount y Treasure r an dChai r

o f th e Lan dBan k

Fas t Trac k Authorit y 1 amwel l verse di n economi c developmen t

effort s i n mid-Michigan . Ther e i s n o bette r servic e i n thi s regio n tha n direc t trave l t o Washington , D.C . an dMinneapolis , MN . Since , Eri c Schertzin g X j CT * Ingha mCount y Treasure r www.ingham.org