alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 4946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2437]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY:  U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  Vol. 65, No. 
13, Thursday, January 20, 2000, page 3208.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:  2:00 p.m., Wednesday, 
January, 26, 2000.

CHANGES IN MEETING:  The closed Commission briefing on the Compliance 
Status Report was not held due to the agency closing because of a 
weather emergency. The meeting has been rescheduled for Thursday, 
February 3, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:  Sadye E. Dunn, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207, (301) 504-
0800.


    Dated: January 31, 2000.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2437 Filed 1-31-00; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, David H. Fleischman, Chief
Financial Officer of TradeStation Group, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TradeStation Group, Inc.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



|                 |  |                                        
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|November 8, 2006 |  | /s/ David H. Fleischman                
|Date             |  | David H. Fleischman                    
|                 |  | Chief Financial Officer,               
|                 |  | Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
#### CHILDS v. STATE.

No. 26544.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile, upon a public highway, while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at one year in jail and. a fine of $250.

The record in this case fails to show that any notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the court, in the absence of which this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court
Exhibit 23.2   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-_______) pertaining to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 25, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 1, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  New York, NY /s/ Ernst & Young June 29, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kramont Realty Trust (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis
P. Meshon, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                            ------------------------
                                            Louis P. Meshon, Sr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Kramont Realty Trust
                                            November 13, 2003

                                       21
Exhibit
      14.1





**NTK
      HOLDINGS, INC.**





**CODE
      OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT**





NTK
      Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”)
      has
      adopted this Code of Ethics (the “ Code ”)
      for
      Senior Financial Management (defined below) to promote honest and ethical
      conduct and to deter wrongdoing. This Code applies to the Company’s President
      and Chief Executive Officer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice
      President and Controller, Vice President and Treasurer and any other employees
      performing similar functions who have been identified by the President and
      Chief
      Executive Officer (collectively, the “ Senior
      Financial Management ”).
      The
      Company expects the highest possible ethical conduct from the Senior Financial
      Management and their full compliance with the Code is mandatory.





Any
      person who has information concerning any violation of the Code by any member
      of
      the Senior Financial Management shall promptly bring such information to the
      attention of the Vice President and General Counsel of the Company. The Vice
      President and General Counsel will refer complaints, as necessary, to the Board
      of Directors of the Company or an appropriate Committee of the Board, for
      resolution. Violations of the Code may subject the offending employee to
      appropriate actions, such as censure, suspension or termination, as determined
      by the Board of Directors or an appropriate Committee of the Board. Such actions
      shall be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote accountability
      for adherence to the Code. The Board of Directors or an appropriate Committee
      of
      the Board, shall consider any request for a waiver of the Code and any
      amendments to the Code. All such waivers or amendments shall be disclosed
      promptly as required by law or Securities and Exchange Commission (“ SEC ”)
      regulation.





All
      members of the Senior Financial Management shall:





1.
            Engage
                in, and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical
                handling
                of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
                professional relationships;





2.
            Provide
                full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports
                and
                documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and
                in other
                public communications by the
                Company;





3.
            Comply
                with all applicable governmental laws, rules and
                regulations;





4.
            Promptly
                report any possible violations of the Code to the Vice President
                and
                General Counsel; and





5.
            Be
                held accountable for adherence to the
                Code.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT C. CERVANTEZ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

C. K. PLILER,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 06-56352

D.C. No. CV-04-00625-SGL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen G. Larson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2009

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, TROTT and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Cervantez appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a

writ of habeas corpus, alleging two errors.

FILED

DEC 22 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

First, in connection with the lesser included offense of manslaughter, he

asserts that the state trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the State bore

the burden of disproving “heat of passion” beyond a reasonable doubt. This claim

fails because the failure of a state court to instruct on lesser included offenses does

not present a federal constitutional question cognizable on federal habeas review. 

Solis v. Garcia, 219 F.3d 922, 929 (9th Cir. 2000). Also, the California Court of

Appeal held that the factual record was utterly devoid of any evidence that would

have supported a finding of “heat of passion.” This determination is well

supported by the record. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal correctly concluded

pursuant to Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999), that any instructional

omission was harmless under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967). 

Likewise, the omission of the instruction had no substantial and injurious effect or

influence on the jury. Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 638 (1993).

Second, Cervantez argues that the removal by the state trial court of a sitting

juror who indicated that she would not follow the court’s orders deprived him of

his right to due process guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The Court of Appeal found appropriate factual and legal cause for the trial

court’s decision. We agree. Moreover, there do not yet exist established rules

from the Supreme Court governing the handling of a recalcitrant juror. 
3

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-147570 and 333-149806) on
Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-147569 and 333-147758) on Form S-3 of InfoLogix, Inc. of our report dated
April 15, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, and the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
InfoLogix, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
MCGLADREY & PULLEN LLP

Blue
Bell, Pennsylvania
April 15, 2009

---



QuickLinks
# Gazzetta ufficiale L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0707 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | L 198 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Legislazione | 61° anno6 agosto 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0707

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

L 198

Edizione in lingua italiana

Legislazione

61° anno6 agosto 2018

---

| Sommario | | II   Atti non legislativi | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI |
| | * | Informazione riguardante l'entrata in vigore di un protocollo tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri e la Repubblica libanese che istituisce un dispositivo di risoluzione delle controversie relative alle disposizioni commerciali dell'accordo euromediterraneo che istituisce un'associazione tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica libanese, dall'altra | 1 |

Sommario

II   Atti non legislativi

pagina

ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI

*

Informazione riguardante l'entrata in vigore di un protocollo tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri e la Repubblica libanese che istituisce un dispositivo di risoluzione delle controversie relative alle disposizioni commerciali dell'accordo euromediterraneo che istituisce un'associazione tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica libanese, dall'altra

1

| IT | Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.
  I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco. |
| --- | --- |

IT

Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.

I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco.

---

II Atti non legislativi

ACCORDI INTERNAZIONALI

| 6.8.2018 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | L 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2018

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

L 198/1

---

Informazione riguardante l'entrata in vigore di un protocollo tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri e la Repubblica libanese che istituisce un dispositivo di risoluzione delle controversie relative alle disposizioni commerciali dell'accordo euromediterraneo che istituisce un'associazione tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica libanese, dall'altra

Il protocollo tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri e la Repubblica libanese che istituisce un dispositivo di risoluzione delle controversie relative alle disposizioni commerciali dell'accordo euromediterraneo che istituisce un'associazione tra la Comunità europea e i suoi Stati membri, da una parte, e la Repubblica libanese, dall'altra, firmato a Bruxelles l'11 novembre 2010, entra in vigore a decorrere dal 1o settembre 2018, conformemente all'articolo 23 del medesimo.

o

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 15
          - [ET Docket No. 18-295 and GN Docket No. 17-183; FCC 23-86; FR ID 192755]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission is correcting the docket numbers for commenters under the preamble section titled,                         **ADDRESSES**                        , of the proposed rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 26, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Nicholas Oros of the Office of Engineering and Technology, at                         *Nicholas.Oros@fcc.gov*                         or 202-418-0636.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In FR Doc. 2023-28620 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 26, 2024, the following correction is made: On page 14016 in the first column and first sentence in                     **ADDRESSES**                     of the preamble, “ET Docket No. 13-115 and RM-11341” is corrected to read “ET Docket No. 18-295 and GN Docket No. 17-183”.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-04494 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, William R. Cruz, Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of
TradeStation Group, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TradeStation
Group, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. May 5, 2004

Date
    
    By: /s/ William R. Cruz
William R. Cruz
Co-Chairman of the Board
and Co-Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 208 (Friday, October 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26327]

[[Page 65394]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Docket No. DHS-2012-0064]

Homeland Security Advisory Council; Open Teleconference Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Policy, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Correction of the Notice of Federal Advisory 
Committee Meeting for: Notice of Open Teleconference Federal Advisory 
Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the date of the teleconference meeting of 
the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC) that was published in the 
October 22, 2012, Federal Register at FR 77 64532. The date was 
incorrectly listed as Thursday, November 8, 2012. The correct date of 
the meeting is Wednesday, November, 7, 2012, and the time of the 
teleconference remains 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Smith, Director, hsac@dhs.gov 
or 202-282-9445.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of correction of this meeting is 
given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-
463, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App.
    As stated in the notice published on October 22, 2012, members of 
the public must contact a staff member of the HSAC to obtain the call-
in teleconference number, and they will be advised at that time of the 
correct date of the teleconference.

Becca Sharp,
Executive Director, Homeland Security Advisory Council, DHS.
[FR Doc. 2012-26327 Filed 10-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-09-P
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00358-CV

ST. JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, 

PATRICIA SISTRUNK, R.N., AND 

AMANDA GLOVER, R.N.,

Appellants

v.

GRANT TAYLOR, M.D., AND MELISSA POWELL, M.D., 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND 

NEXT FRIENDS OF E.A.T., A CHILD,

Appellees

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 08-000611-CV-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, 

and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). 

PER CURIAM
St. Joseph Regional Health Center v. Taylor Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 22, 2009

[CV06]
#### Norberto Santiago, Appellant, v Gjelosh Dedvukaj, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated May 1, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by the Workers’ Compensation Law, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion to dismiss the defendant’s affirmative defense that workers’ compensation coverage was the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that controversies regarding the applicability of the Workers’ Compensation Law rest within the primary jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Board *(see, Botwinick v Ogden,*59 NY2d 909; *O’Rourke v Long,*41 NY2d 219; *Becker v Clarkstown Cent. School Dist.,*157 AD2d 641), including issues as to the existence of an employer-employee relationship *(see, Calhoun v Big Apple Wrecking Corp.,*162 AD2d 574). In the instant case, the Workers’ Compensation Board determined that the plaintiff was the employee of Hoti Realty Management Company, and that he was injured during the course of his employment. The plaintiff was accordingly awarded workers’ compensation benefits. This determination was final and binding *(see, O’Connor v Midiria,*55 NY2d 538; *Calhoun v Big Apple Wrecking Corp., supra),*and, thus, the plaintiff may not maintain the instant action against the defendant proprietor of Hoti Realty Management Company and his fellow servant *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]), by arguing that he was in fact employed by an altogether different commercial entity.

We have reviewed the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.