alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 19, 2014

t0916 

# Order

Clerk September 19, 2014

149047 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149047

COA: 319913

Ingham CC: 13

- 000362

- FH

LINDSEY LYNN KONOPKA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue and file supplemental brief is

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014 order of the Court

of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to

appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of whether the

circuit court improperly imposed court costs, in light of our decision in People v

Cunningham , 496 Mich 145 (201 4), and if so, whether the circuit court’s assessment of

$500 in “court costs” constitutes plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.

Contrast People v Franklin , 491 Mich 91 6 (2012), with Johnson v United States , 520 US

461, 467

- 468 (1997).

We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to the fact that we have also remanded

People v Holbrook (Docket No. 149005) to the Court of Appeals for consideration of

similar issues. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











The Board of Directors


AeroGrow International Inc.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Forms S-3 and S-8 of AeroGrow International Inc. of our report dated June 25, 2010, with respect to the balance sheets of AeroGrow International Inc. as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, which report appears in the March 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of AeroGrow International Inc.








/s/ Eide Bailly LLP





Greenwood Village, CO


June 25, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-012;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000729976
<NAME>                        ENCIBAR, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,046
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        74,482
<OTHER-SE>                      (77,528)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (780)
<INCOME-TAX>                    100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (880)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2181 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2181

To authorize National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial on 
  Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor free persons and 
slaves who fought for independence, liberty, and justice for all during 
                        the American Revolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2011

  Mr. Payne (for himself and Mr. Wolf) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial on 
  Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor free persons and 
slaves who fought for independence, liberty, and justice for all during 
                        the American Revolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING.

    Congress finds that the contributions of free persons and slaves 
who fought during the American Revolution were of preeminent historical 
and lasting significance to the United States, as required by section 
8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Federal land.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``Federal land'' means 
                the parcel of land--
                            (i) identified as ``Area I''; and
                            (ii) depicted on the map numbered 869/
                        86501B and dated June 24, 2003.
                    (B) Exclusion.--The term ``Federal land'' does not 
                include the Reserve (as defined in section 8902(a) of 
                title 40, United States Code).
            (2) Memorial.--The term ``memorial'' means the memorial 
        authorized to be established under section 3(a).

SEC. 3. MEMORIAL AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Authorization.--In accordance with subsections (b) and (c), 
National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. may establish a memorial on Federal 
land in the District of Columbia to honor the more than 5,000 
courageous slaves and free Black persons who served as soldiers and 
sailors or provided civilian assistance during the American Revolution.
    (b) Prohibition on Use of Federal Funds.--National Mall Liberty 
Fund D.C. may not use Federal funds to establish the memorial.
    (c) Applicable Law.--National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. shall 
establish the memorial in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, 
United States Code.

SEC. 4. REPEAL OF JOINT RESOLUTIONS.

    Public Law 99-558 (110 Stat. 3144) and Public Law 100-265 (102 
Stat. 39) are repealed.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3338

_____________________________ S HAY L YNN C OE ( f/k/a Wilkinson )
, Appellant,

v.

C HARLES E RVIN W ILKINSON , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Paul S. Bryan , Judge

. July 27, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 William Falik of William Falik P.A., Gainesville
, for Appellant.

Robert A. Sandow, Lake City
, for Appellee.
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00761-CV

DALTON R. MCWHINNEY AND VELVA MCWHINNEY, Appellants

V.

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., AND DEUTSCHE BANK 

NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellees

Appeal from the 506th District Court of Waller County. (Tr. Ct. No. 07-09-19041).

TO THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT OF WALLER COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 4th day of December 2014, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on August 1, 2013. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Accordingly, the Court reverses the 

trial court’s judgment and remands the case to the trial court 

for further proceedings.

The Court orders that the appellees, Ameriquest 

Mortgage Securities, Inc., and Deutsche Bank National Trust 

Company, jointly and severally, pay all appellate costs.
The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered December 4, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and 

Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 13, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
#### Andrew P. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27650.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1955.

*882No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is sodomy; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of-exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented -for review. ■ .

The judgment is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this case.
#### Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. R. G. STIVERS.

No. 1607.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 22, 1937.

Morrison . Shafroth, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

L. E. Cahill, of Tulsa, Old, for respondent.

Before BRATTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SYMES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for review dismissed on motion of petitioner.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Service
Air Group, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, I, Jag Dhillon, Chief
Executive Officer and I, Mohammad Sultan, Chief Financial Officer of Service Air
Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that: 1.
Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Service Air Group, Inc.   By:
/s/   Jag DhillonJag DhillonChief Executive Officer  By:
/s/   Mohammad SultanMohammad Sultan Chief Financial Officer Dated: August 22, 2005
**Exhibit
      23.1**














**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











The
      Board
      of Directors


AeroGrow
      International Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      Forms SB-2 (Nos. 333-141689 and 333-133180 of AeroGrow International Inc. of
      our
      report dated June 8, 2007, with respect to the balance sheets of AeroGrow
      International Inc. as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements
      of
      operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended March 31,
      2007, the three month period ended March 31, 2006 and the year ended December
      31, 2005, which report appears in the March 31, 2007, annual report on Form
      10-KSB of AeroGrow International Inc.








***/s/
      Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP***





Greenwood
      Village, CO


June
      29,
      2007
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











The Board
of Directors


AeroGrow
International Inc.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Forms
S-3 and S-8 of AeroGrow International Inc. of our report dated June 10, 2008,
with respect to the balance sheet of AeroGrow International Inc. as of March 31,
2008, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash
flows for each of the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, which report appears
in the March 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of AeroGrow International
Inc.








/s/
Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP





Greenwood
Village, CO


July 1,
2009
### Revised version of Section V and VI Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A., Mancini, Dominic J. 06/01/2010 06:44 PM

Cc: Scott Mathias, Larry Wallace, Kevin McLean, Sara Schneeberg, Anna Wood, Richard Wayland, James Hemby, Steve Page, Janet McCabe, Tricia Crabtree, Mike Thrift, Lydia Wegman

Jim and Dom,

Attached is a revised version of sections V and VI that we believe addresses the comments we discussed today. This includes responses to your comments on PSD permitting, use of controls similar to those used in nonattainment areas, and section 110(a)(1) plans for attainment and unclassifiable areas. We hope this revised version addresses all of the issues in these sections which we discussed today. We have also made some changes to address concerns we had and you will find those in redline as well. If we need to talk tonight, please call my cell phone at 919 -621-3125. Otherwise, we should plan to have a discussion as early as possible tomorrow morning. Please let me know the best time for you to talk. Thanks.
1 Filed 1/29/14 P. v. Beatty CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Glenn)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. ROBERTA ANN BEATTY, Defendant and Respondent. C073301 (Super. Ct. No. 10NCR08286)

In August 2010, defendant Roberta An n Beatty was charged with two felony offenses: commercial burglary an d forgery of a prescription fo r drugs. In January 2011, defendant pled no contest to both charges. In March 2011, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and pla ced defendant on three years of formal probation. Among
the terms and conditions of her probation, defenda nt was required to complete Glenn County’s felony drug court program. Twenty-one months later, on October 3, 2012, defendant app eared in the trial court for her “drug court graduation.” De fendant, her counsel, and probation were present at the graduation; the People were no t represented. At the graduation hearing,
defendant’s counsel made an oral motion to reduce the felony ch arges to misdemeanors2 and dismiss them. The trial court granted co unsel’s motion. On December 31, 2012, the trial court issued a written order reducing th e felony charges to misdemeanors, dismissed the charges, and discharged defendant from probation in the intere sts of justice. The People appeal from the December 31, 2012 order. On appeal, the People contend the trial court erred in reducing defendant’s charges to misdemeanors without giving the People two days’ written notice as mandated by Penal Code section 1203.3, subdivision (b)(1). The People further conte nd the trial court erred in dismissing the charges against defendant without giving th e People 15 days’ notice of the petition to dismiss the charges, notice that is re quired by Penal Code section 1203.4, subdivision (e)(1). Defendant di d not respond to the appeal. After reviewing the law and the record in this appeal, we agree the trial court erred in both respects.
DISPOSITION The order reducing the charged offenses to misdemeanors and dismissing those same charges is reversed and the felony ch arges are reinstated. Probation also is
reinstated. The matter is rema nded to the trial court with in structions to set for hearing within 60 days of the remitti tur, defendant’s motions to re duce the charged offenses to
misdemeanors and to dismiss them.

ROBIE , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

BUTZ , J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for 
Cyberinfrastructure (#25150).
    Date and Time: April 11-12, 2024; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Rm 3410, Alexandria, VA 
22314 (In-Person).
    The final meeting agenda and instructions to register and attend 
the meeting will be posted on the ACCI website: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/oac/advisory.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: Walton, Amy, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-4538.
    Minutes: May be obtained from Christine Christy, National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 
Telephone: (703) 292-2221 and will be posted within 90-days after 
the meeting end date to the ACCI website: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/oac/advisory.jsp
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs, and activities in the OAC community. To provide advice to 
the Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning.
    Agenda: Updates on NSF wide OAC activities: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/oac/advisory.jsp.

    Dated: February 15, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-03519 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	 

	 




THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of March 31, 2019, by and between MOUNT TAM BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (“Maker”), and 0851229 BC Ltd. (“Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.Maker and Holder entered into that certain Convertible Promissory Note on March 23, 2016 (the “Note”). 

 

B.The Note was amended and restated by Maker and Holder pursuant to that certain Second Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note entered into as of June 13, 2016, amended on March 5, 2018 pursuant to that certain Amendment to Secured Convertible Promissory Note, amended on September 24, 2018 pursuant to that certain Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note, amended on November 14, 2018 pursuant to that certain Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note, and further amended on December 31, 2018 pursuant to that certain Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note. 

 

C.Maker and Holder have agreed to further amend the Note pursuant to the terms set forth herein.  

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The Note is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date thereof to June 30, 2019. 

 

2.This Amendment supersedes any and all other provisions of the Note which are in conflict with this instrument. 

 

3.This Amendment constitutes the full and complete agreement between the parties hereto.  All other provisions of the Note, as amended, not modified herein shall remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein. 

 

 

 

[Signature page follows]





 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note effective as of the effective date set forth above.

 

 

 

	 

	MAKER:

 

MOUNT TAM BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

 

By:/s/ Richard Marshak 

Name:Richard Marshak 

Title:Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 


	 

	HOLDER:

 

0851229 BC Ltd.

 

 

By:/s/ Doug Froese 

Name:Doug Froese 

Title: Director 





Signature Page to Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note