alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Bitters,
certify that:

1.    
          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American
         Energy Production, Inc.;

2.    
          Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
          report;

3.    
          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
          financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer as of,
          and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.    
          I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
          procedures for the issuer and have:

(i)    Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
issuer is made known to me, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports
are being prepared;

(ii)     Evaluated the
effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
as of September 30, 2003 [Evaluation Date]; and

(iii)    
                     Presented in
the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the (September
 30, 2003) Evaluation Date;

5.                   I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the issuers
               auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons
               fulfilling the equivalent function):

(i)    
          All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
          which could adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process,
          summarize and report financial data and have identified for the issuers
          auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls (none were so noted); and

(ii)    
          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
          who have a significant role in the issuers internal controls (none were so
          noted); and

6.     I have
indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

|                       |                                                           
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 9, 2003 | /s/ Charles Bitters
Charles Bitters
President and Director
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION



I, Brett White, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Corio, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
6. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
7. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
8. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
9. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
10. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

|Date: November 12, 2004 | /s/ Brett White
|----------------------- | ---------------
|                        |                

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SABPREET SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-71306

Agency No. A205-937-152

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Sabpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-71306

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 

2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Singh failed to 

establish the harm he experienced or fears in India was or would be on account of a 

protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (an 

applicant “must provide some evidence of [motive], direct or circumstantial”); see 

also Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2011) (a personal dispute, 

standing alone, does not constitute persecution on account of a protected ground). 

Thus, his asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Singh failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the 

consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to India. See Wakkary v. 

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of torture).

We reject as unsupported by the record Singh’s contention that the agency 

failed to consider evidence or otherwise erred in the analysis of his claims. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
April 23, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEROME FISHER PLEASANT, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00165-CR

NO. 14-13-00166-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Donald H. Baxter, Chief Executive Officer, and Ronald F. Rohe, Chief Financial
Officer, of Philadelphia Fund, Inc. (the "Registrant"), each certify to
the best of his knowledge that:

   1. The Registrant's periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended
      November 30, 2008 (the "Form N-CSR") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and

   2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form N-CSR.



/S/ Donald H. Baxter                               /S/ Ronald F. Rohe
-----------------------                           -----------------------
Donald H. Baxter                                  Ronald F. Rohe
Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 28, 2009                             Date: January 28, 2009

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or
as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony N. DeMint, certify that:

> 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form	10-QSB of YFC 355 Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this	quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or	omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in	light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not	misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial	statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly	report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,	results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and	for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I am the sole officer and director	and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls	and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))	for the small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,		or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under		my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the		small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made		known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the		period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business		issuer disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report		my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on		such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that		occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter		(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an		annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to		materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over		financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most	recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small	business issuer's auditors of the small business issuer's board of directors	(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material		weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial		reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small		business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report		financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves		management or other employees who have a significant role in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2005

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                     

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer
Exhibit 99.4

I, Emanuel Chirico, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  December 15, 2003

| | /s/ Emanuel Chirico         
| | ----------------------------
| | Emanuel Chirico             
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer
Monday’s front page presented a stark example of how we have drifted off course as a society

and how our lawmakers have lost their bearings when it comes to spending our tax dollars. On the same page that carried a story about the efforts of volunteers with the Charlestown Community Garden working to feed families in need, we had a story indicating the Rhode Island Airport Corporation was working to provide a $900,000 state

-guaranteed loan to a Massachusetts airline so it could provide more convenient service between Block Island and larger airports. Where to begin? The community garden, started from a Boy Scout project, is a 9,500

-square

-foot plot of land that provides fresh produce to four organizations

— the Charlestown Senior Center, the Jonnycake Center ofWesterly, St. Andrew Lutheran Church, and the Rhode Island Center Assisting Those in Need. Volunteer Susie Fehrmann, who heads the project, said she knows personally of the vital role such an effort can play in the lives of people in need. “I had a period in my life when I was hungry, and I had to depend on other people. Somebody did that for me; I have to do that for people in this community and this area that don’t have anything. And it’s way worse now,” she said. We have written often of how it’s “way worse now,” including as recently as least week, when we noted that local social service agencies are experiencing an increase in demand for food as donations of food are decreasing. Even the state

-run food bank has less food to provide to the local
agencies. The economy continues to bring once comfortable families into a new and ugly reality that leads them to become a statistic on the ledger sheets of our social service agencies. Meanwhile, we’ve got the Rhode Island Airport Corporation applying for a $900,000 federal grant to give a private airline financial backing to add service between TF Green Airport in Warwick and Block Island from spring through fall. The objective: more conveniencebetween the island and larger airlines that fly into and out ofGreen. The island is now served by New England Airlines ofWesterly, which has provided service for the past 40 years. In the Block Island Times story that we carried about the issue, there was no one complaining about the status quo or calling for this new service. So we’re hoping to give a state

-backed loan to an out

-of

-state company rather than helping an existing business? Why does that sound familiar? You get a sense that RIAC and the federal Department of Transportation are looking for

reasons to furtherjustify their existence when no one is seeking their help in this case, while the federal agencies that provide food aid to the poor are scrambling and still failing to meet the basic needs of those screaming for help. Airline service between the mainland and Block has been fine for decades. RIAC and the federal DOT need to cancel the grant request and instead let the Rhode Island Food Bank know there’s $900,000 in federal money burning a hole in some bureaucrat’s pocket. This is nothing short of ludicrous.
H. R. 2079 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 Main 

Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Victor USENER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27386.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

Dooley & Hoerster, by Richard Hoerster, Fredericksburg, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the felony offense of drunken driving. Art. 802b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. The punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and twenty days in jail.

The prior conviction relied upon to constitute the offense was alleged to have occurred in the County Court of Kendall County on the 13th day of September, 1948, in Cause No. 676 against this appellant.

■ The disposition of this case turns upon whether the state identified the appellant as being the person who was convicted and referred to in the judgment of conviction.

To identify appellant as the person so convicted, the state relied mainly upon the testimony of M. J. Lehmann, who, at the time of the giving of his testimony, was the County Judge of Kendall County and, at the time of the alleged prior conviction, was a practicing attorney in Kendall County.

The certified copy of the judgment of conviction showed that on September 13, 1948, in Cause No. 676 in the County Court of Kendall County, one Victor Usener appeared in person and by his attorney, Honorable M. J. Lehmann, and, through his said attorney, pleaded guilty of the offense charged in the information, and was adjudicated guilty of the offense of operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated.

The witness Lehmann failed to identify appellant as the person named in the judgment or as the one he represented, as attorney, and for whom he entered a plea of guilty in that case.

The witness was asked: "You simply can’t say, though, Judge Lehmann, that this is the man you represented?” His answer was: “No. I don’t, I just haven’t seen — ”

The witness was then asked: “Could it have been somebody else ?” His reply was: “Yes, it could have been. I just can’t identify this man * *

Recognizing the position it was in by this testimony, the state resorted to circumstantial evidence to establish the identification.

It was shown that Victor Usener, the appellant, was the only son of Judge Herman Usener; that the witness Lehmann, on only one occasion, represented Victor Use-ner, the son of Judge Herman Usener, for driving while intoxicated, such occasion being in the County Court of Kendall County before Judge Balser, who, as the judge, *711entered the prior judgment of conviction referred to and signed it.

Any fact may be established by circumstances, as well as by direct testimony.

We are constrained to conclude that the circumstances are sufficient to authorize the jury’s conclusion that the appellant was the person named in the judgment of conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2

[ON ERNST & YOUNG LLP LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Optionplan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 2, 2003, filed with the Securities andExchange Commission.

 

 

Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

September 18, 2003