alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vernon TERRELL, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 9, 1953.

Robert J. Watson, Middlesboro, for mov-ant.

J. D. Buckman, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Bell Circuit Court. Judgment of conviction for the use by a male of abusive and insulting language with the intent to insult a female. $50 fine. The facts, questions raised, authorities cited and applicable law have been carefully considered by the Court.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2014

No. 04-14-00177-CR

Alejandro Leal PENA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-090168-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on August 11, 2014. Appellant’s first 

motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief was granted, extending the deadline for 

filing the brief to September 10, 2014. The brief has not been filed. Appellant’s attorney is 

ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten days of the date of this order. The 

response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate 

the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney fails to file an adequate 

response within ten days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, 

and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(b)(2). 

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1


                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Wings &
Things, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

a.   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


Date: October 29, 2003
                                   /s/ Linda L. Perry
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Linda L. Perry
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant                    
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  | Douglas G. Bryant
Chief Financial Officer
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:ba21d6b1-37b0-4296-aa37-3d976abc4bf4,g:96a57749-8ad0-47c6-95f2-362c49e1e4be-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:pvh="http://www.pvh.com/20220307" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.pvh.com/20220307">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021/dei-2021.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20220307_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="pvh-20220307_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="DocumentandEntityInformationDocument" roleURI="http://www.pvh.com/role/DocumentandEntityInformationDocument">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Document and Entity Information Document</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
  <xs:element id="pvh_CoverPageAbstract" abstract="true" name="CoverPageAbstract" nillable="true" xbrli:periodType="duration" substitutionGroup="xbrli:item" type="xbrli:stringItemType"/>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
#### IRENE H. BROMBERG *v.*PATRICK SNOW ET AL.

(14860)

Foti, Heiman and Schaller, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 13

decision released March 5, 1996

*934
      *Jon C. Leary*filed a brief for the appellants (defendants).

*George A. Law*filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1



                              Annual Certification



         Re:   Morgan Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-1 (the "Trust"),
               Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-1, issued
               pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
               January 1, 2005 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by
               and among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc, as depositor (the
               "Depositor"), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee
               (the "Trustee"), First NLC Financial Services, LLC, as
               responsible party (the "Responsible Party"), MILA, Inc., as
               responsible party (the "Responsible Party"), and HomEq
               Servicing Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer")

      I, Arthur Q. Lyon, certify to the Depositor, the Trustee and their
      officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that
      they will rely upon this certification, that:

            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 2005 calendar
            year and the Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing
            Agreement has been made under my supervision, the Servicer has
            complied with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material
            respects and, to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
            Servicer has materially fulfilled all of its obligations under the
            Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such calendar year.



      Date: March 30, 2006



      HomEq Servicing Corporation


      /s/ Arthur Q. Lyon
      ---------------------------
      Arthur Q. Lyon
      President
#### BALDWIN v. STATE.

No. 26904.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 24, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving.while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record contains no notice of appeal, and this Court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1


                         IDI Global, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      We, the undersigned, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   November 12, 2003           /s/ Kevin R. Griffith
                                    __________________________________________
                                    Kevin R. Griffith
                                    Chief Executive Officer




Date:   November 12, 2003           /s/ Melanie Young
                                    _________________________________________
                                    Melanie Young
                                    Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
Abdoulline,  as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


By:
-------------------------------

Albert Abdoulline
President, CEO and CFO
Date: August 5, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04128]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-679 (Fifth Review)]


Stainless Steel Bar From India

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless 
steel bar from India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on September 1, 2023 (88 FR 
60486) and determined on December 5, 2023 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (89 FR 8441, February 7, 2024).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on February 23, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5496 (February 2024), 
entitled Stainless Steel Bar from India: Investigation No. 731-TA-679 
(Fifth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 23, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-04128 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-017;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00059-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

v.

DOUGLAS CARRANZA

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14CR8191-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 16, 2017
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 31, 2011 

Mr. KEATING (for himself, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

LYNCH, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. NEAL, Mr. 

OLVER, and Ms. TSONGAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, 

Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Saga6 more Beach, Massachusetts, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2062 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino 

5 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Mabel GANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27815.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40041 consolidated with No. 23-40042

_____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Juan Galvan-Hernandez, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. 5:17-CR-423-2, 5:22-CR-1034-1

______________________________ Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appo inted to represent Juan GalvanHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40041 Document: 00516825018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2023No. 23-40041 c/w No. 23-40042

2 v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galvan-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’ s brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We conc ur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issu e for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilitie s herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-40041 Document: 00516825018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2023
Exhibit 31.3


Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Jorge Titinger, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Graphics International Corp. for the year ended June 24, 2016; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL CORP.By:/s/   JORGE TITINGERJorge TitingerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated: October 21, 2016
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43001

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

SAMUEL DAVID FORD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 677

Filed: October 28, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years with three years determinate, and a consecutive sentence of ten years indeterminate, for two counts of felony injury to children, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann All red , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Samuel David Ford pled guilty to two counts of felony injury to children . Idaho Code §

18

- 1501(1) . The district court sentenced Ford to a unified term of ten years with three years

determinate, a nd a consecutive sentence of ten years indeterminate

. Ford appeals asserting that

the district court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

f

actors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ford ’s judgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.