alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 25C6ARV0 PMNX130830158347455 137021
X X X Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X


## X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONAndrea Balestrini Product and Technical Manager Americas LAMBERTI USA INC. P. O. Box 1000 Hungerford TX 77448 andrea.balestrini@lamberti.com

Andrea Balestrini Product and Technical Manager Americas Lamberti USA P. O. Box 1000 Hungerford TX 77448 andrea.balestrini@lamberti.com 281-342-5675 

## X

X X X XXX Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX 

## X XXX 

## X 162502 Sanitized CST-2100 CAS.pdf 

### XXX 

## X See Attachment 002 (Sanitized CST-2100 Reaction and Final Structure.pdf)
Sanitized CST-2100 Reaction and Final Structure.pdf Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

XXX
XXX 

## X X X Page 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONCST-2100

alkyl triazine Formaldehyde 50-00-0 0.05

XXX XXX 

### X Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

X Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X XXX XXX XXX 

## X XXX X

XXX 

## X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X

Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X X X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X X X

Page 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X X

Page 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX 

## X

Page 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

XXX

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONTrithiane Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 CAS Inventory Expert Service Sanitized CST-2100 CAS.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. 1 002 CST-2100 Reaction and Final Structure Sanitized CST-2100 Reaction and Final Structure.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 1 003 CST-2100 MSDS CST-2100 MSDS.pdf 4

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X Measured 0.88-0.93

105F Measured Flash Point Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONActivity 98 % Estimate Solubility, 10% in Fresh Water Insoluble Measured Solubility, 10% in Kerosene Soluble Measured Solubility, 10% in Isopropanol Soluble Measured Solubility, 10% in Xylene Soluble Measured Solubility, 10% in Methanol Soluble Measured

Page 20 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name CAS Inventory Expert Service 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX130830158347455

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name CST-2100 Reaction and Final Structure 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX130830158347455

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name CST-2100 MSDS 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX130830158347455
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2118 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2118

To amend the National Labor Relations Act relating to the authority to 
   enjoin State laws that are preempted by or conflict with such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2011

Mr. Chaffetz (for himself, Mr. Gowdy, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act relating to the authority to 
   enjoin State laws that are preempted by or conflict with such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON LITIGATION AUTHORITY.

    Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 160) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) The Board shall have no authority to enjoin or otherwise 
restrain the application or enforcement of any provision of a law of a 
State or political subdivision of a State on the grounds that such 
provision of law is preempted by or conflicts with any provision of 
this Act. The Board may refer its determination regarding such a law to 
the Attorney General who may institute an action described in the 
previous sentence under appropriate legal authority.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         709,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 787,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        517,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   787,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


 




EXHIBIT 10.3




EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT




THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into on April 8, 2019 by and between Lightwave Logic, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and James S. Marcelli (“Employee”).  




1.

This Agreement amends that certain Employee Agreement dated August 10, 2015, as amended from time to time, made and entered into by the parties hereto (the “Employee Agreement”). Capitalized terms herein have the same meaning as used in the Employee Agreement, unless otherwise noted. 




2.

Effective April 8, 2019, the Termination Date described in paragraph 1.2 shall be extend to December 31, 2021. 




3.

Effective May 1, 2019, Paragraph 4.1 of Article 4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 




4.1. Base Compensation.  For all services rendered by Employee under this Employee Agreement, the Company agrees to pay Employee the rate of $262,500 per year ($21,875 per month), which shall be payable to Employee not less frequently than monthly, or as is consistent with the Company’s practice for its other employees.




4.

Effective May 1, 2019, the following paragraph 4.4 shall be added to Article Four: 




4.4. Bonus Compensation.  Employee shall be eligible to receive bonus compensation to be determined by the Board of Directors from time to time in their sole discretion.




5.

All other provisions of the Employee Agreement remain in full force and effect, other than any provision that conflicts with the terms and spirit of this Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.




				
	 
	 
	LIGHTWAVE LOGIC, INC.:


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:

	/s/ Michael S. Lebby


	(Witness signature)

	 
	 
	Michael S. Lebby, CEO


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	EMPLOYEE:


	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	/s/ James S. Marcelli


	(Witness signature)

	 
	James S. Marcelli
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of PikeElectric Corporation (“Pike Electric”) of our reports dated August 29, 2007 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements, and schedule of Pike Electric Corporation, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Pike Electric, included in Pike Electric’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 20071. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126902) pertaining to the Pike Holdings, Inc.2002 Stock Options A, Pike Holdings, Inc. 2002 Stock Options Plan B, and Pike ElectricCorporation 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, 2. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130087) pertaining to the Pike ElectricCorporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 3. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-137158) of Pike Electric Corporation./s/ Ernst & Young LLPGreensboro, North Carolina
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50709

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEBORAH LYLE DYSART,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-00-CR-298-03-JN

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Deborah Lyle Dysart (“Dysart”), federal prisoner number 15051-

180, appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for

downward departure and to serve the remainder of her sentence in a

Community Corrections Center. 

The district court may modify the imposed term of imprisonment

under limited circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Because

Dysart’s motion for a downward departure did not fall under any of

the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), it was unauthorized and
G:\opin-sc\02-50709.opn.wpd 2

without a jurisdictional basis. See United States v. Early, 27

F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). After a district court has

sentenced a federal offender, the Bureau of Prisons has the

responsibility for designating the place of imprisonment. Thus,

Dysart’s motion to serve the remainder of her sentence in a

Community Corrections Center likewise lacked a jurisdictional

basis. See United States v. Voda, 994 F.2d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir.

1993); 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b). Although the district court considered

the motion on its merits, it should have denied the motion for lack

of jurisdiction. See Early, 27 F.3d at 142. On that alternative

basis, the district court’s order is 

 AFFIRMED. All outstanding motions are DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

SEAN DAVID O'CONNER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 427 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Regulatory Evaluat ion Complete when i ssuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure. 

## D No Change from existing AD action Docket No . FAA- Directora te Identifier : 2015-CE-025

-AD 

### If

you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals zpdate accordingly. 

### If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. Estimated Costs: Costs per Product (e .g., aircraft, engine , Action propeller, appliance ) Work-hours L abor Parts Cos t T otal Costs Number of Total Cost (e.g . , Inspection, (include cost (labor + 

## u. s. for U.S . Fleet

replacement) access, testing, (@$ 8 5/h parts) Registered and close

-up) our) Products Part I

- Inspection 2 .0 1,375 Part IIRepair 

### I 8.0 $500 1,375 modification

The known numb er of products in compliance : Total Costs of comp liance for U . S. fleet: $1 , 85 6 ,250 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ Specia l considerations for E conomic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might n o t be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) : All aircraft require the inspection. The repair I modificat i on is based on the results of the inspect i on. It is anticipated that all of the aircraft will require the repair 

### I modification. The current 

### FAA registry shows 977 ac tive aircraft, so this analysis using 1, 375 aircraft i s conservative. Executive Order 1 2866 : Could the AD be considered a "significant regula tory action" ? Y E S* 

## D NO(gi*Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD 

### significant? 

# G YES* 

## D N0[8J *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. • YES 

## D NO [8J Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?



## ~ YES* 

## D NO [8J 

### *Explanation:
Note: The FAA considers the following e

- mail from the petitioner to be sufficient as a

statement of petition withdrawal. To: Steve Slotte/ANM/FAA@FAA From: Anthony Pilcher <Anthony.Pilcher@Armstrongaerospace.com> Date: 06/25/2013 11:57AM Cc: Nick Grasberger <Nick.Grasberger@Armstrongaerospace.com> Subject: RE: Armstrong Aerospace

- 26.11(c) Exemption Application Steve, I received your voicemail. W e were able to work with the Chicago ACO to develop and achieve approval of a generic EW IS ICA Evaluat ion that is repeatedly used for these projects. Thank you for that suggestion. Please provide instructions on how I can withdraw the Armstrong request for exemption and I will do so. Thanks, Anthony

______________________________________________ Anthony Pi lcher Director, Technology, Innovation & Compliance Armstrong Aerospace Inc. 1437 Harmony Court Itasca, IL 60143 Office: ( 630) 285

- 0200 ext. 112 Mobile: ( 501) 310

- 6423 www.armstrongaerospace.com
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6040** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BERNARD MARLIN GADSDEN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:04

- cr - 01018

- DCN

- 1 )

Submitted : February 13, 2013 Decided: February 20, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bernard Marlin Gadsden , Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard Marlin Ga dsden seeks to appeal the district court’s orders directing the Government to respond to Gadsden’s motion for reduction of sentence and granting the Government an extension. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 0 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order s Gadsden seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocut ory or collateral order s . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decis ional process.

DISMISSED
# RECEIVED NOV 24 2014

## ~------------------------------~H~E=A=R=INGDOCKET U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
In

### the Matter ofWings Air, LLC, Respondent FDMS No. FAA-2013-0849 FAA Case Nos. 2012EA110052 Judge J.E. Sullivan AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT

The Complainant, the Agency, by its undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws its Complaint in this matterper 14 CFR Section l3.215, as a result ofa settlement agreement that has beenmutually reached between the parties in this case. Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Jolmson, Jr. Regional Counsel

By:

# ~~ zachary

# Mh4_rman Attorney Federal Aviation Administration

________**ILtlA~vimaf,~,LUUd**

### __________________________ ___ Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL:718 553-3258 FAX: 718 995-5699 Date: November 19, 2014CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that a copy ofthe foregoing AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT has been sent via first class mail and facsimile to the following: Jared M. Allen, Esq. Gregory S, Winton, Esq
. .The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel: 301 294-8550 Fax: 301 294-2525 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202)366-7536 I hereby certifY that a copy ofthe foregoing AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT has been sent via first class mail to the following:
Federal Aviatio11 Aciihinistration (Original and one copy via first class mail) 800.IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Att!l:.Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building

- Room 2014

--------------**--Bate-:----Nuvemhert9;-20-I-4~-**

I 

### L""' Hooks Paralegal Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

2
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment To Dispose of 1.1 Acres 
at Worcester Regional Airport, Worcester, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request 
from the City of Worcester, MA to Dispose of 1.1 Acres at Worcester 
Regional Airport, Worcester, MA. The land is no longer needed for 
aviation purposes and can be disposed without affecting future aviation 
needs of the airport. The revenue generated by the disposal will be 
placed into the airport's operation and maintenance fund.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 24, 2024.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
    <bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy E Quam, Compliance Specialist, 
Federal Aviation Administration New England Region Airports Division, 
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803. Telephone: 781-
238-7618.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 23, 2024.
Julie Seltsam-Wilps,
Deputy Director, ANE-600.
[FR Doc. 2024-04132 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# Uradni list L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 66 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 618. marec 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 66

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 618. marec 2018

---

| Vsebina | | Popravki | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Popravek Uredbe (EU) 2018/302 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2018 o naslovitvi neupravičenega geografskega blokiranja in drugih oblik diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, kraja prebivališča ali kraja sedeža strank na notranjem trgu ter o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 2006/2004 in (EU) 2017/2394 ter Direktive 2009/22/ES ( UL L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Popravki

Stran

*

Popravek Uredbe (EU) 2018/302 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2018 o naslovitvi neupravičenega geografskega blokiranja in drugih oblik diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, kraja prebivališča ali kraja sedeža strank na notranjem trgu ter o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 2006/2004 in (EU) 2017/2394 ter Direktive 2009/22/ES ( UL L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( UL L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

Popravki

| 8.3.2018 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 66/1

---

Popravek Uredbe (EU) 2018/302 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2018 o naslovitvi neupravičenega geografskega blokiranja in drugih oblik diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, kraja prebivališča ali kraja sedeža strank na notranjem trgu ter o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 2006/2004 in (EU) 2017/2394 ter Direktive 2009/22/ES

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije L 60 I z dne 2. marca 2018
  )

Stran 14, zaključno besedilo:

besedilo:

„
  Za Evropski parlament

Predsednica

L. PAVLOVA

Za Svet

Predsednik

A. TAJANI
  “

se glasi:

„
  Za Evropski parlament

Predsednik

A. TAJANI

Za Svet

Predsednica

L. PAVLOVA
  “.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 30, 2006