alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 420
112th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                H. R. 2154

                          [Report No. 112-580]

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
            Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2011

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                              July 9, 2012

      Additional sponsors: Mr. Duncan of Tennessee and Mr. Sherman

                              July 9, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
 [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 
                               13, 2011]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
            Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Gasparilla Island Unit FL-
70P'' included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to the Gasparilla Island Unit in 
Florida is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same unit 
entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Corrected 
Gasparilla Unit FL-70P'' and dated July 8, 2011.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                                 Union Calendar No. 420

112th CONGRESS

   2d Session

                               H. R. 2154

                          [Report No. 112-580]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
            Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              July 9, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements  of the  December  31, 1998 Form 10-K of  Integrated  Resources  High
Equity Partners, Series 85 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statemens.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,301,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,814,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,791,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,814,689
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,189,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,276,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,591,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,931,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,931,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,931,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>
Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers

Overview of the ,P voposed Rule

Building Technologies Program

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

U.S. Department Energy

September 27, 2004

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
vurpose of 'the Public Meeting

Present t Department's proposed Test Procedure

0 Seek comment from participants

methodolog i es and requirements

D iscuss and respond to s pecific issues questi ons

related to t proposal

D iscuss the next steps

2

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
ziteps in the Distribution Transformers

Test Procedure Rulemaking

Determination

Analysis NOPR

Re-Opening Supplemental Final

Notice NOPR Rule

Determination Analysis Notice published October 22, 1997

Initiating workshop February 10, 1998

Test procedure NOPR published November 12, 1998

Re-opening Notice published June 23, 1999

Supplemental NOPR (SNOPR) publ ished July 29, 2004

® Comment Period open until November 8, 2004

Final Rule scheduled for September 2005

3

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
Test Procedure Overview

In each area, these proposals are di fferent

previously pu blished i n the NOPR and Re-Open i ng Noti ce

1 ® Definition Distribution Transformer

2 ® Defi n ition of Basic Model

3® Uniform Test Method for Measuring Energy Consumption

4. Sampli ng Plans for Compliance and Enforcement Testi ng

5. Alternative Efficiency Determ i nation Method (AEDM)

4

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
Next Steps

Comments on SNOPR from i nterested parti es

Transcript records oral comments from today's public meeting

Written comments (comment period closes on November 8, 2004)

I DOE reviews a nd considers all comments (transcript, written)

DOE Test Procedure Final Rule Publi cation

Timing is dependent on nature of comments from Stakeholders to this

proposal

Final Rule will be published before the NOPR for the efficiency standards

rulemaking

5

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
%,omments and Issues from Part icipants

Participants invited provide or

statements

Parti ci pants are invited to raise their issues for discussion

6

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.5
Attachment F


 




EXHIBIT 10.1




PORTIONS HEREIN IDENTIFIED BY [*****] HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED  FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE THE EXCLUDED  INFORMATION IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.




		
	Grant ID: DP160012 

	PI/PD/CR: Jeff Hutchins




No Cost Extension with Attachment F









As indicated by the signatures below, the INSTITUTE and the RECIPIENT agree to the following amendments to the CPRIT Contract:

Original Contract End Date: 31 May 2019

Current Contract End Date: 31 May 2019

Proposed Contract End Date: 30 Nov 2019

Justification: [*****].

Contract Document F: Parties hereby agree that the RECIPIENT is granted a six-month extension of time from the date of the original

contract termination date reflected in Section 2.03 of the Contract, for purposes of concluding the approved scope of work as authorized by

the Contract. Accordingly, the May 31, 2019 termination date is deleted in Section 2.03 and replaced with November 30, 2019. All terms

and conditions of the Contract continue during the extension period. Parties agree that this extension is a “no-cost” extension and approval of

this amendment does not approve, grant or confer additional grant funds in excess of the amount originally awarded.

Description: The May 31, 2019 termination date is deleted in Section 2.03 and replaced with November 30, 2019.

		
	RECIPIENT

Pelican Therapeutics

ASO Name: Jasuja, Rahul

Submitted Date: 06 Mar 2019

	INSTITUTE

Cancer Prevention & Research

Institute of Texas

CEO Name: Roberts, Wayne

Approved Date: 12 Apr 2019
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Leon
Golden, as a Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
 
 By: /S/ Leon GoldenLeon
      GoldenCFODate:  August
      13, 2009
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSEP H D EONN HO RNE, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. J. R U T L E D G E , C orre ct i on al O ff i ce r; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 17378 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 3 8 7 - SBA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S aundr aB . A rm s tr ong, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r22, 2010 ** B efo re: W A L L A C E , H A W K IN S an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton the e xc e s s i ve forc e c l ai m because J oseph D eonn H orne (“ H orne”) f ai l ed t o rai se a tri abl e i ss ue as t o w h eth er p ri so n g u ard s act ed “ m al i ci o u sl y an dsad i st i cal l y fo r th e v ery p u rp o se 

# FI LED OC T 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17378 2 o f c au s in g h a rm ” b yu s in g p e p p e rs p r a ya f te rH o rn e r e p e a te d lyr e f u s e dto c o m p ly w ith o r d e r s to c e a s e h o ld in g h is b la n k e t u p to th e c e ll d o o r . H uds on v . McMi l l i an , 50 3 U . S . 1, 6 (19 92 ) ( ci t at i on and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed). H orne’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .
<PAGE>   1
                           PERFORMANCE BONUS PLAN FOR
                       CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & PRESIDENT
                                 ROBERT BERGLASS

1.      Bonuses will be based on net, after tax, income (after accruing for
        bonuses) per the audited financial statements of DEP Corporation.

2.      This bonus program applies for a three year period covering the fiscal
        years ending July 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000.

3.      A bonus would be paid only if DEP exceeds the net projected income
        levels in the multi-year Court Plan that was approved by the Board in
        1996 in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings (the "Plan Net
        Income"), as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               Fiscal Year Ending                  Plan Net Income
               ------------------                  ---------------
               <S>                                 <C>
               July 31, 1998                       $3,392,000
               July 31, 1999                       $4,455,000
               July 31, 2000                       $5,166,000
</TABLE>

4.      The bonus would be a percentage of net, after tax income, and after
        bonus accrual as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Fiscal Year Ending July 31,
                                                          ---------------------------------
                                                          1998          1999           2000
                                                          ----          ----           ----
        <S>    <C>                                        <C>           <C>            <C>
        A.     If Plan Net Income is met or exceeded
               in any year:                               5.0%          5.0%           5.0%

        B.     If Plan Net Income is met or exceeded
               for two consecutive years:                               7.5%           7.5%

        C.     If Plan Net Income is met or exceeded
               for three consecutive years:                                           10.0%
</TABLE>

5.      For example, if the Plan Net Income is achieved for all three fiscal
        years, the figures would be as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Fiscal Year Ending July 31,
                                         ------------------------------------------------
                                            1998               1999               2000
                                         ----------         ----------         ----------
        <S>                              <C>                <C>                <C>       
        Net Income                       $3,392,000         $4,455,000         $5,166,000

        Percentage bonus achieved                 5%               7.5%                10%

        Bonus amount                     $  169,600         $  334,125         $  516,600
</TABLE>


                                  Exhibit 10.15
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I,
Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 1.
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Liankuan
  YangName:
  Liankuan YangTitle: Chief
  Executive Officer, principal executive officer Dated:
November 16, 2009 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1














Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-158327) pertaining to the PVH Associates Investment Plan of our report dated June 23, 2021, with respect to the financial statements of the PVH Associates Investment Plan included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2020.








/s/ SPIELMAN KOENIGSBERG & PARKER, LLP











March 4, 2022
**Exhibit 31.1**

**RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael S.Willner certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)          any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

|   | /s/ MICHAEL S. WILLNER               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael S.  Willner                  |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Insight Midwest,  L.P.               |
|   | May 15, 2007                    |

 

----
Attachment 8

‐ Particle Size Data
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 135)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eschelon Telecom, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), Geoffrey M. Boyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, doeshereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlyrepresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Sign:                   | /S/ | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|-------------------------|-----|------------------|--------|
| Geoffrey M. Boyd        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 11, 2004    |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2          Certification.

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
U.S.C. 63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Accounting Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  May 19, 2004

(signed)_____________________
Edward  Alexander
/s/  Edward  Alexander
Chief  Accounting  Officer  of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Proton Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Proton
Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### CITIZEN v. STATE.

No. 26758.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1954.

*110McDaniel & Hunt, A. D. Downer, Center, for appellant. • •

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, five years.

In view of our disposition of this cause, a recitation of the facts will not be deemed necessary.

Appellant s motion for new trial is supported by the affidavit of the foreman of the -jury, which recites that during their deliberations one of the jurors made the statement that he had heard that Dr. Dan Bussey of Timpson had made a medical examination of the prosecutrix shortly after the time when prosecutrix was alleged to have been raped and that such medical examination revealed that prose-cutrix had had sexual intercourse with someone recently..

The testimony of seven jurors was heard on the motion. The affiant and another juror swore that such statement had been made during the course of their deliberations. Several other jurors testified that Dr. Bussey’s name had been mentioned but that if any statement about his having found evidence of intercourse was made they did not hear it. It should be noted that no juror denied that any such statement had been made, and none testified that if the statement had been made he would have heard it. .

An examination of the statement of facts on the main trial fails to reveal any mention of Dr. Bussey nor was any medical evidence introduced!

In Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 465, 466, we said:

> “Since this testimony as to what occurred in the jury room was not controverted, no issue of fact was raised for the trial court’s determination.

> “Under this state of the record, it became the duty of the trial court to grant appellant’s motion for new trial.”

Because of the receipt by the jury of new evidence on a' material issue during their deliberations, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.