alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Finn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Lawrence Finn                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Lawrence Finn                                                                                                                                                           |  
 

Chief Financial Officer

 
 

November 14, 2005

  |
#### M. P. PIEARSON, Appellant, *v.*The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27603.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1955.

*837No attorney on appeal for appellant..

Henry Wade, Crirri. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty.,. Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, 99 years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of • exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### WOODS v. STATE.

No. 26599.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life.

The record is before us without a statement of fácts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Doris ESTES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27302.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1955.

*412Ennis Favors, Stephenville, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years.

George Speer testified that his drug store in the City of Dublin was broken into on the night in question and $33 taken from the cash register.

Tom Patton, an employee of Speer, testified that he checked the door to the drug store at ten o’clock on the night in question and found it to be locked.

Sheriff George testified that he investigated the burglary at the drug store the following morning and found that the front doors had been prized open and that he saw the appellant in the custody of the sheriff at Meridian, Texas, the next day.

Appellant’s confession was introduced in evidence without objection, wherein she stated that she came from Fort Worth on the night in question in company with one Howard and one Avery; that they noticed the drug store and decided to go in; that they stopped the automobile in which they were riding in front of the drug store; that Avery went to the door while she and Howard stayed in the automobile and watched. The confession further recites that Avery returned to the automobile and reported that the door was unlocked; that they drove around a bit and returned to the drug store; that Avery went in while she and Howard watched in order to warn Avery if anyone came up; and that Avery came out of the drug store, and they drove away.

The appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in her behalf.

 Appellant in her brief urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction.

Appellant cites three cases not involving the offense of burglary and Bolin v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 373, 208 S.W.2d 370. She alleges that in the Bolin case there was evidence of flight which is not present in the case at bar. We need not decide whether the fact that the appellant was found the-day following the burglary in the custody of the sheriff at Meridian constituted evidence of flight because it has been the rule in this State since Attaway v. State, 35 Tex.Cr.R. 403, 34 S.W. 112, that, where-the State shows that a burglary has been-committed by someone, the confession may be used to establish who the guilty party was.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 The following certifications accompany this report and are being furnished pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications shall not, except
to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section,
or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates them by reference into such a filing.
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   /s/ Greg R. GianforteGreg R. GianforteChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President   /s/ Jeffrey C. DavisonJeffrey C. DavisonChief Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2117 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Department of Education from overreaching 

into academic affairs and program eligibility under title 

IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2117 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Academic 

3 Freedom in Higher Education Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO STATE AU5 THORIZATION AND DEFINING CREDIT HOUR. 

6 (a) REGULATIONS REPEALED.— 

7 (1) REPEAL.—The following regulations (in8 cluding any supplement or revision to such regula9 tions) are repealed and shall have no legal effect: 

10 (A) STATE AUTHORIZATION.—Sections 

11 600.4(a)(3), 600.5(a)(4), 600.6(a)(3), 600.9, 

12 and 668.43(b) of title 34, Code of Federal Reg13 ulations (relating to State authorization), as 

14 added or amended by the final regulations pub15 lished by the Department of Education in the 

16 Federal Register on October 29, 2010 (75 Fed. 

17 Reg. 66832 et seq.). 

18 (B) DEFINITION OF CREDIT HOUR.—The 

19 definition of the term ‘‘credit hour’’ in section 

20 600.2 of title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, 

21 as added by the final regulations published by 

22 the Department of Education in the Federal 

23 Register on October 29, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 

24 66946), and clauses (i)(A), (ii), and (iii) of sub25 section (k)(2) of section 668.8 of such title, as 
3 

•HR 2117 EH

1 amended by such final regulations (75 Fed. 

2 Reg. 66949 et seq.). 

3 (2) EFFECT OF REPEAL.—To the extent that 

4 regulations repealed by paragraph (1) amended reg5 ulations that were in effect on June 30, 2011, the 

6 provisions of the regulations that were in effect on 

7 June 30, 2011, and were so amended are restored 

8 and revived as if the regulations repealed by para9 graph (1) had not taken effect. 

10 (b) REGULATIONS DEFINING CREDIT HOUR PROHIB11 ITED.—The Secretary of Education shall not promulgate 

12 or enforce any regulation or rule that defines the term 

13 ‘‘credit hour’’ for any purpose under the Higher Edu14 cation Act of 1965 on or after the date of enactment of 

15 this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2117 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Department of Education from 

Act of 1965. eligibility under title IV of the Higher Education overreaching into academic affairs and program
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


_____________________________


FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The


Securities Exchange Act of 1934











Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


August 24, 2016








PVH CORP.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212)-381-3500


Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---
















ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION


On August 24, 2016 , PVH Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release to report the Company’s earnings for the second quarter 2016 , which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1.


The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d) Exhibits .


ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated August 24, 2016.
















































































---







SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





PVH CORP.





By: /s/ James W. Holmes


James W. Holmes


Senior Vice President and Controller





Date: August 24, 2016








---













Exhibit Index





ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated August 24, 2016.
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | By:    /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                                                                          |
|   |         Mark D. Fischer        Executive Vice President |
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
IB 

Union Calendar No. 250 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2087 

[Report No. 112–369] 

To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in the Atlantic District, 

Accomack County, Virginia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2011 

Mr. RIGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JANUARY 18, 2012 

Additional sponsor: Mr. HARRIS

JANUARY 18, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see bill as introduced on June 2, 2011] 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2087 RH

A BILL 

To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in 

the Atlantic District, Accomack County, Virginia. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2087 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS. 

4 (a) REMOVAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall execute such instruments as may be necessary to re7 move all deed restrictions described in subsection (b) relat8 ing to the parcel of land described in subsection (c). 

9 (b) DEED RESTRICTIONS.—The deed restrictions re10 ferred to in subsection (a) are those restrictions, including 

11 easements, exceptions, reservations, terms, conditions, and 

12 covenants described in Quitclaim Deed No. 17808A from 

13 the United States to Accomack County, Virginia, executed 

14 on December 20, 1976, and recorded among the real estate 

15 records of Accomack County, Virginia, by the Clerk of the 

16 Circuit Court, on pages 292 through 296 of Deed Book 381. 

17 (c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re18 ferred to in subsection (a) consists of approximately 31.6 

19 acres situated in the Atlantic District, Accomack County, 

20 Virginia, more particularly described in the metes and 

21 bounds description recorded on page 292 of the quitclaim 

22 deed described in subsection (b). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 250 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2087 

[Report No. 112–369] 

A BILL 

To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situVirginia. ated in the Atlantic District, Accomack County, 

JANUARY 18, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JULY 31, 1996, AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                      11,118,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,750,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,999,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,206,000
<PP&E>                                      14,086,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,838,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,918,000
<BONDS>                                      3,597,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,000<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,218,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,838,000
<SALES>                                    119,088,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       45,022,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              116,008,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,818,000<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,120,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,958,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,958,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,958,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Property, plant and equipment net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Common Stock includes both Class A and Class B common stock.
<F4>Includes, $3,895,000 related to reorganization items.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14932-14935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-
622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or 
Assistant Director for Compliance, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On February 14, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 14933]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29FE24.003


[[Page 14934]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29FE24.004


[[Page 14935]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29FE24.005


    Dated: February 14, 2024.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2024-04241 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 13, 2011 /s/Dominick Pope
     Chief Executive Officer
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

c$jr223)ll-E-189 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM Sheet 229 of 264 
P.2 

-ar-e-1% 

CONTACT REPOBi 

From: Madeleine Strom, US EPA, OAQPS, Coatings and Consumer Products Gump 

Ifeite of Conturt: SftpTflrnber 24, 1998 

Contact: MT. Benny Puva.ll 

Company/Agency: Aker Plastics 

Telephone Number: 304 263 2523 

FAX; 304 263 8369 

Mzzw. 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

CONTACT SUMMARY: 

Mr. Duvall was called in order to follow up on Information piovided earlier to DP A regaining the 

HAP content of the resins (including tooling resins) at the Aker Plaatbs facility in Martinsburg, West 

Virgina, and the two facilities in Plymouth, Indiana. 

All three facilities utilize a production resin -which contains 35% HAP. Vo additional HAP is added 

to the resin after it is received. 

Or\VOnly the "BR Road fadlity in Plymouth performs tooling operations, and therefore, they are ihe only 

Aker facility that usee lending resins. Th* fedlity ntti* only one tooling resin, which has a HAP 

content of 47%. No additional HAP is added lo the twin siter it Is waived. Some of the tooling 

resin is applied by spray lay up and some of the touting i«siu is applied by bucket and brush. 

ftj % of the tooling repin is Applied by bucket and b"i«h (with the remainder of the tooling resin 

applied by spiay lay up) 

Of all the resin (tooling plus production) applied by spray lay up atthe^k Road facility,9<j_ % of 

it is production resin and _\_, % of it is tooling resin. 

ACCURATE AS STATED: 
P.3 

A_9 

2011 Mid-Atlantic Parkway 

Martinsburg, WV 25401 

(304)263-2525 

(304)263-8369 Fax 

NOTES: 

PATE; 

•3/Z££I£L 

COMPANY; 

FAX NUMBER: \ 

il&^ V L^Q A.I c 

PROM ^ 

TL 

NUMBER OF PAGE* (INClUDir^ i COVER SHEET) 

:AX TRANSMISSION-

!! 

< 2 ^
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7459

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES M. HALL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-90-9, CA-97-309-3)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. Hall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James M. Hall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Hall, Nos. CR-90-9; CA97-309-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED