alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934







Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

May 19, 2009





PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|Delaware                                       | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                       
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.)
|200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York         | 10016                   
|(Address of principal executive offices)       | (Zip Code)              



Registrants telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500

Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act

(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act

(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



---





ITEM 2.02

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

On May 19, 2009, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) issued a press release to report the Companys 2009 first quarter earnings, which is set forth in the attached Exhibit 99.1.

The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



ITEM 9.01

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(d)  Exhibits.

|Exhibit | Description                       
|------- | ----------------------------------
|99.1    | Press Release, dated May 19, 2009.







---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION



By: /s/ Bruce Goldstein

Bruce Goldstein

Senior Vice President and Controller



Date: May 19, 2009



---

Exhibit Index



|Exhibit | Description                       
|------- | ----------------------------------
|99.1    | Press Release, dated May 19, 2009.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2148 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2148

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary 
 and exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-
             connected disability and to their dependents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2011

  Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Courtney, and Mrs. Ellmers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary 
 and exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-
             connected disability and to their dependents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Commissary and 
Exchange Store Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES FOR DISABLED VETERANS 
              AND THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    (a) Extension of Privileges.--Chapter 54 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans 
              and their dependents
    ``(a) Disabled Veterans.--A veteran with a compensable service-
connected disability shall be permitted to use commissary and exchange 
stores on the same basis as a member of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(b) Dependents.--A dependent of a veteran described in subsection 
(a) shall be permitted to use commissary and exchange stores on the 
same basis as a dependent of a member of the armed forces entitled to 
retired or retainer pay.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms `veteran' and 
`service-connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 
of title 38.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and 
                            their dependents.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--Section 1065 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      March 15, 2006





By: /s/
      Colin
      Dunn


Colin
      Dunn, Vice President - Finance
      and Secretary
UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
  _____________________________
  FORM 8-K
  CURRENT REPORT
  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 
 
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 June 23, 2011
 
 
 PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION
  (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  
 Delaware
001-07572
13-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York
10016(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
  Registrant’s telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500
  Not Applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
 
  Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
   ̈  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
  ̈  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
  ̈  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act
 (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
  ̈  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act
 (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
   
  ITEM 7.01                      REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
  On June 23, 2011, management of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the “Company”) announced at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders that the Company expects its consolidated revenue for the second quarter and full year 2011 to be towards the high end of its previous guidance.
  The information in this Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
   
   
   
   
   SIGNATURES
   Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
  PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATIONBy:/s/ Bruce GoldsteinBruce GoldsteinSenior Vice President and Controller
  
   Date: June 23, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hector A. Veron, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB/A of Royal  Holiday
Mobile Estates;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 22, 2003                  /s/ Hector A. Veron
                                          ------------------
                                         Hector A. Veron
                                         President/ CEO/Director
#### Zaing HENRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27565.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 18, 1955.

*878Walter L. Wray, Dallas, for appellant.

John F. May, Dist. Atty., Karnes City, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty. of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for murder; the punishment, 99 years in the. penitentiary.

Trial was had on May 15, 1952, and no notice of appeal was given at the term of court during which sentence was pronounced.

. ■ Appellant,. being confined in' the ■ penitentiary under said conviction; made ■ his application -to this Court alleging that the judgmeht entered in the- case -and- upon which sentence was pronounced was void, one reason being that the same did not set out a jury verdict.

- ..Pursuant to Art. 119, V.A.C.C.P., this Court directed the judge of the District Court of Karnes County, Texas, where the conviction was had, to ascertain the facts as to the pronouncement and entry of the judgment.

; The judgment was then corrected by nunc pro tunc order but- without notice to appellant or his counsel, which order was thereafter set aside, and, after notice, a hearing was had upon the State’s motion to correct the judgment. Appellant was brought from the penitentiary upon a bench warrant and was present, ás’ was his counsel, at said 'hearing which resulted in the entry' of judgment' nunc pro tunc’ setting out the jury verdict which assessed appellant’s punishment at 99 years in the penitentiary.

Appellant gave notice of appeal upon the entry of such judgment and the case is before us both upon such notice of appeal and upon the application for habeas corpus.

The trial court is not without authority to correct the minutes of his court so as to make them truly reflect the judgment as pronounced by the court. This appears to, have been done in th.e. case of appellant.

The judgment as originally entered was not void because the verdict was not set out therein. If an appeal had been perfected to this Court, we would • have been authorized to reform the judgment so as to show the verdict of the jury appearing in the record and to make the judgment comply with the verdict. See Ex parte Pitrucha, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 256 S.W.2d 415; Ex parte King, 156 Tex.Cr. R. 231, 240 S.W.2d,777. .

The facts adduced upon the State’s motion-for- entry of judgment nunc.pro tunc show that the omission in the judgment as entered in the minutes was. due to clerical error, -and the entry of the judgment called for by the verdict of the jury and pronounced by the court at. the time thereof was proper.

No other question is raised which requires discussion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and appellant’s prayer for discharge from- the penitentiary is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource Related Research 
Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: March 11, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G11, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Barry J. Margulies, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G11, (301) 
761-7956, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d3d0c3c3c89fdcd0c3d6c4ddd8d4c2f1dfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f09291828289de9d918297859c999583b09e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

     Dated: February 20, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03817 Filed 2-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
06/28/2012 14:38 FAX 2024835142



### June 4, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Room 2014, AGC-400 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington D.C. 

### 20591 FAA

Re: Executive Helicopters, Inc., Case No. 200950950051 + OMS



### By notice ofthis letter, Executive Helicopters Inc. and it's ownerJeremy Bass formally request a hearingregarding our case 

### with the 

### FAA. As instructed 

### Ihave senta copy ofthis request to the FAA attorney lisred on the notice dated May**~0,** 2012. Please let me know ifanyfurther information is needed atthis time. Sincerely,
Jeremy Bass, President Executive Helicopters Inc. 843-333-1626 141001/002



# RECEIVED JUN -. 62012 

# HEARING DOCKET

,-· .':•\



### -- ... ·. \' ...... ''08/29/2012 14:39 FAX 2024935142 FAA -. OMS 

### CERTIFICA"{p OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing 

### Complaint, in the Matter

### ofExecutive Helicopter, Inc., FAA Case 

### No. 2009S0950054, 

### has been mailed this date by 

### Certified Mail to: Mr. Jeremy 

### Bass, President Executive 

### Helicopters, Inc. 

### 3231 Victory Street 

### Hanger 328 West Myrtle Beach, S.C. 29577 

### The original and a copy was also delivered to: Hearing Docket Room 2014, AGC-400 Federal Aviation Administration 600 

### Independence Avenue, S.W. 

### Washington, D.C. 20591 June 12,2012 @002/002
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-28-2004

Coraggioso v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 03-1075

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Coraggioso v. Atty Gen USA" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 1037.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/1037
PRECEDENTIAL

Filed January 29, 2004

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 03-1075

SALVATORE CORAGGIOSO

Petitioner

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States,

Respondent

On Appeal from an Order Entered in

The Board of Immigration Appeals

(No. A77 035 208)

Argued October 28, 2003

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and

AMBRO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed January 23, 2004)

John D. Perez, Esquire (Argued)

41-51 Wilson Avenue

Newark, NJ 07105

Attorney for Petitioner
Robert D. McCallum, Jr.

Assistant Attorney General

Civil Division

Donald E. Keener

Deputy Director

Michelle E. Gorden (Argued)

Senior Litigation Counsel

Michael P. Lindemann, Esquire

John D. Williams, Esquire

Office of Immigration Litigation

Civil Division, Department of Justice

P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Attorneys for Respondent

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge: 

It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above

case filed January 23, 2004, be amended as follows: 

On page 6 of the slip opinion, in the first full paragraph

(“In interpreting the scope of the DV Program. . . .”), the

penultimate sentence (which begins “If Congress had used

. . .”) is changed to delete the word “been”, such that the

sentence reads, “If Congress had used different language,

our analysis may be different.” 

By the Court, 

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: January 29, 2004

A True Copy:

Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2
From: Lee, Arthur

To: Heggs, Angela

Subject: FW: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Date: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:29:30 AM

-----Original Message-----

From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 2:38 PM

To: Lee, Arthur

Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Lee,

Thank you for your response. This answers my question perfectly and resolves the interpretation issue

on our end.

Have a great day!

Shane Nash

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC.

Air Force Safety Center

Kirtland AFB, NM

DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827

-----Original Message-----

From: Lee, Arthur [mailto:ALee@cpsc.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:33 PM

To: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG

Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Nash

The proposed rule requires extension cords within the scope of the rule to meet all applicable safety

characteristics outlined in the proposed rule. The absence of any one of the characteristics would make

the product a substantial product hazard. See 80 FR 5701.

I hope this answers your question. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Arthur Lee

US Consumer Product Safety Commission

Directorate for Engineering Sciences

Division of Electrical Engineering

5 Research Place

Rockville, MD 20850

301 987-2008

alee@cpsc.gov

-----Original Message-----

From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:30 PM

To: Lee, Arthur

Subject: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords
Good morning, sir!

I am seeking clarification to the proposed rule. Is the proposal for extension cords to have ALL 4 of the

readily observable characteristics or at least 1 characteristic? Your help in clearing this up is greatly

appreciated.

Thank you!

Shane Nash

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC.

Air Force Safety Center

Kirtland AFB, NM

DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827

*****!!!

Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed in this

e-mail (and any attachments) are solely those of the author and do

not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

Copies of product recall and product safety information can be sent

to you automatically via Internet e-mail, as they are released by

CPSC. To subscribe or unsubscribe to this service go to the following

web page: http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Newsroom/Subscribe

*****!!!