alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`Promissory Note
$ 30,000.00 USD                  Temple, Texas                Date Oct. 18, 2000



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 


                 THE SUM OF THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($30,000.00)

In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.5% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.

THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

Thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00) principal due in one year (on or before
October 16, 2001)

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
constitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
 notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.


                            David Hancock, President`
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2031 

To amend the Plant Protection Act to expedite the process for approval 

of certain biotechnology products, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. FINCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Plant Protection Act to expedite the process 

for approval of certain biotechnology products, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expediting Agriculture 

5 Through Science Act’’ or ‘‘EATS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TIMELINE FOR APPROVAL OF PETITIONS FOR RE7 MOVAL OF PLANT PESTS FROM REGULATION. 

8 Section 411(c) of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 

9 7711(c)) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2031 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, including 

2 biotechnology products’’ before ‘‘from’’; 

3 (2) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the 

4 following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(3) RESPONSE TO PETITION BY THE SEC6 RETARY.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a peti8 tion submitted under paragraph (2), the Sec9 retary shall determine, based on sound science, 

10 whether to approve such petition not later than 

11 180 days after the date on which the Secretary 

12 receives such petition. The Secretary may ex13 tend the period for such determination for two 

14 periods of 30 days each, if the Secretary noti15 fies the petitioner of each extension of the de16 termination period. 

17 ‘‘(B) NOTIFICATION.—The notification de18 scribed in subparagraph (A) shall be in the 

19 form of a letter from the Secretary or a des20 ignee of the Secretary and shall include the 

21 name and title of each person processing the 

22 petition, the specific reason for the delay in the 

23 determination, and a specific date on which a 

24 determination is expected. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2031 IH

1 ‘‘(C) DENIALS.—For each petition the Sec2 retary denies, the Secretary shall provide the 

3 petitioner— 

4 ‘‘(i) written, clear, and comprehensive 

5 reasons why the petition was denied and 

6 detailed information concerning any defi7 ciencies in the petition; and 

8 ‘‘(ii) an opportunity to remedy any 

9 such deficiencies. 

10 ‘‘(D) DEEMED APPROVED.—If the Sec11 retary has not made a determination to approve 

12 a petition by the end of the 240-day period be13 ginning on the date the Secretary received such 

14 petition, the petition shall be deemed ap15 proved.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8


No. 333-_____) pertaining to the PVH Corp. Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 28, 2023, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PVH Corp. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PVH Corp. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 29, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





New York, NY


June 22, 2023
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00555

- CR

Robert MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 307125

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration   Statement
(No.333-128202)  on Form S-8 of Parke Bancorp,  Inc. of our report dated January
20, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated  financial statements,  which
appear in the  Annual  Report to  Stockholders,  which is  incorporated  in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Parke  Bancorp,  Inc. for the year ended  December
31, 2005.



/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PVH Corp. (“the Company”) for the quarterly period ended July 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated:September 6, 2012By:/s/ EMANUEL CHIRICOName:Emanuel ChiricoChairman and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I,John A. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Form 10-K/A of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained inthe Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 24, 2010      |     |
|---------------------------|----------|
| * *                  | * * |
| /s/  JOHN A. ROBERTS      |     |
| John  A. Roberts          |     |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Assets &
Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 9, 2003


/s/ Bertram Cutler
- -----------------------
Bertram Cutler,
President, CEO, & CFO
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (“Deep Down”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, Gay Stanley Mayeux, Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep Down.





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:August 16, 2010





/s/GAY STANLEY MAYEUX


Gay Stanley Mayeux


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
msb_Ex10_(i)


		
			Exhibit 10(i)
		

		
			 
		

		
			SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF TRUSTEES’ COMPENSATION
		

		
			 
		

		
			The compensation paid to each Individual Trustee and the Corporate Trustee is set forth in the Amendment to the Agreement of Trust dated as of October 25, 1982 (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment is filed as Exhibit 3(a) to the Form 10-K.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Pursuant to the Amendment, each Individual Trustee receives at least $20,000 in annual compensation for services as Trustee.  Each year, annual Trustee compensation is adjusted up or down (but not below $20,000) in accordance with changes from the November 1981 level of 295.5 (the “1981 Escalation Level”) in the All Commodities Producer Price Index (with 1967 = 100 as a base).  The All Commodities Producer Price Index is published by the U.S. Department of Labor.  The adjustment is made at the end of each fiscal year and is calculated on the basis of the proportion between (a) the level of such index for the November preceding the end of such fiscal year, and (b) the 1981 Escalation Level.  Each of the Individual Trustees received $40,817 in cash compensation for services to the Trust during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019, except Ms. Radke, who received $9,500 since she joined as a Trustee of the Trust in January 2019.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Also pursuant to the Amendment, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Corporate Trustee, receives annual compensation in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $20,000, or such other amount determined in accordance with the adjustments described in the preceding paragraph, or (ii) one quarter of one percent (1/4 of 1%) of the Trust Moneys, exclusive of proceeds of sale of any part of the Trust Estate (as such terms are defined in the Agreement of Trust), received by the Trustees and distributed to Trust Unitholders.  The Corporate Trustee earned $48,872 pursuant to this provision for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Additionally, each year the Corporate Trustee receives $62,500 (or more, if unanimously approved by the Individual Trustees) to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust other than services customarily performed by a registrar or transfer agent.  In fiscal 2019, the Trust paid the Corporate Trustee $62,500 to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust and $7,244 for services as registrar and transfer agent.  The Corporate Trustee earned $161,256 in total compensation for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00324

- CR

KELVIN MILES A/K/A KELVIN KARL MILES

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20FC

- 5168B

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, ha ving considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 25, 2022
Opinion issued October 4, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00637-CR

———————————

JOSE ALFREDO PERALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 71698

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 2014, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of the state-jail-felony 

offense of theft—aggregated, and assessed his punishment at confinement for 
2

eighteen months.1In June 2015, appellant filed a pro se motion for time credit in 

which he sought “diligent participation credit” to reduce his sentence. See TEX.CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12, § 15(h) (West Supp. 2016). The trial court denied the 

motion, and appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want 

of jurisdiction.

The right to appeal in a criminal case is a statutorily created right. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801, 

805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); see also Keaton v. State, 294 S.W.3d 870, 871 (Tex.

App.—Beaumont 2009, no pet.) (citation omitted) (“The right to appeal is conferred 

by the Legislature and generally, a party may appeal only those cases for which the 

Legislature has authorized appeal.”). Generally, a criminal defendant may appeal 

only from a final judgment. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; State v. 

Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The denial of a 

post-conviction motion for time credit is not an appealable order. Abbott v. State, 

271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (citation omitted).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 31.03(a), (b), (e)(4), 31.09 (West Supp. 2016).
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
NO. AP -76,794

EX P ARTE SE RENA ROJAS, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1058663D IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT #2

F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d guilty to bu rgl ary of a h ab i t at i o n in exchang e for defe rre d adjudication community supervision. Her guilt was later adjudicate d, and she w as sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that her counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance b ec au s e he failed to timely file a notice of appea l afte r adjudication in this case . Although Applicant expressly waived appea l in conjunction w ith her orig inal plea, that wa iver is not eff ective a s to the adjudication and sentenc ing proce dures. As of J une 15, 2007, the deter mination by the court of whether it proce eds2

with an adjudication of guilt is revie wabl e i n t h e s ame manner as a revoc ation of “straight” probation. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 42.12 §5(b). Moreove r, “af ter an adjudication of guilt, all proce eding s, including assessment of punishment, pronounce ment of senten ce , granting of community supervision, and defe ndant’s appea l continue as if the adjudication of guilt had not been defe rre d.” Id. There fore , counsel’s deter mination that no appea l could be taken in this case beca use of Applica

nt’s waiver

of appe al duringthe orig inal plea wa s incorre ct. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportu n i t y to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt adjudicating guilt in Cause No. 1058663D from the Criminal District Court #2 of Tarr ant County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which she may g ive a written notice of appea l

so that she m ay then, wit h the aid o f co u n s el , o btain a meaningf ul appea l. Wit hin ten day s of t he issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr ese n t ed b y co u n sel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire t o pros ec u t e an appea l, she m ust take affirmative steps to file a written not ice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice- Co r r ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: May

9, 2012 Do not publish
| **NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details) - shares shares in Millions**           | May 05, 2019 | May 06, 2018 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]** |         |         |
| Number of Dilutive Shares That Could Be Issued Upon Vesting                               | 0.2          | 0.1          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_NumberOfDilutiveSharesIssuedUponVesting**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |