alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the annual report for Diamond Ranch Foods,  Ltd, on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph
Maggio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: February 3, 2006


By:    /s/ Joseph Maggio
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
       Joseph Maggio, Chairman, CEO, and Director
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 16

- 5299

_____________________________

S EGWAYNE G OLDSON

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet, Judge

.

February 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant Segwayne Goldson appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for sexual battery with physical force likely to cause serious injury and sexual battery. His ap pointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. 1 Thereafter, counsel was ordered to file a supplemental brief addressing three issues identified by this court as potentially meritorious. Consideration of the arguments raised on appeal as well as our ind ependent review of the record and applicable law has revealed no reversible

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re Order of First Dist. Court of Appeal Regarding Brief Filed in
Forrester v. State , 556 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1990).2 error in the circuit court’ s proceedings. Accordingly, the judgment of convi ction and sentences are A FFIRMED

.

B ILBREY

, W INSOR

, and M.K. T HOMAS

, JJ., concur

.

____________________ _________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

Jonathan Dingus, Panama City, and Segwayne Goldson, pro se, for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
| **NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED (Details) - shares shares in Millions**           | Aug. 02, 2015 | Aug. 03, 2014 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Earnings Per Share, Diluted, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]** |          |          |
| Number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting                               | 0.8           | 1.0           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the number of dilutive shares that could be issued upon vesting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_NumberOfDilutiveSharesIssuedUponVesting**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:sharesItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EarningsPerShareDilutedLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| **Basis Of Presentation (Details)** | Mar. 16, 2020 customer |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Peoples Gas Acquisition [Member]    |                   |
| Number of customers                 | 747,000                |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of customers.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtrg_NumberOfCustomers**Namespace Prefix:**wtrg_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionAxis=wtrg_PeoplesGasAcquisitionMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.


|                       |                                                        
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 14, 2009 | /s/ Mark A. Lopez
Mark A. Lopez
Chief Executive Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unico, Incorporated and will be retained by Unico, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Cary G. Rochelle 

Attorney at Law and Mediator 

March 29,2016 

Hearing Docket 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence A venue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

RE: Stone Motors Incorporated and/or David Stone 

Docket No.: FAA-2015-3319 

OFFICES 

2224 ST. MICHAEL DR. 

TEXARKANA, TEXAS 75503 

TELEPHONE: 

(903' 794-2224 

FAX (903) 792-2380 

Enclosed for filing, please find the Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing in this matter. 

The parties have resolved all matters in this cause and a hearing is no longer needed. 

Thank you for your cooperation and if you need anything additionally, please contact 

me. 

cc: Hon. J.E. Sullivan Adm Law Judge . 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S!Dept. OfTransportaiqn 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Sincerely Yours, 

Attorney 

Gzh~~ at Law 

rochellelaw@cableone.net 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

STONE MOTORS INC., AND/OR DAVID STONE 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-3319 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING 

COMES NOW the Respondent, STONE MOTORS,INC., AND/OR DAVID STONE, in the 

above styled and numbered cause of action and withdraws its Request for Hearing. The Respondent 

would show that the parties have reached a settlement agreement resolving all issues in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/·:; /""/ ? 

.. /' .c;;.·' ~/: ... /" . .·"./ ( ·;,. 7 ~>...z.,t.C-i~z_.~'... I Cary G. Rochelle 

Attorney for Stone Motors, Inc and/or 

David Stone 

2224 St. Michael Dr 

Texarkana,Texas 75503 

903-794-2224 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this the 28'h day of March, 2016, I have sent via U.S, Mail a copy 

of this Request to Withdraw Hearing to the following: 

Hearing Docket 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Wilbur-Wright Building Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C, 20591 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Adm Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Dept. Of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 
James Archier 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southwest Team 

I 0101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, Texas 76177 

Cary G. Rochelle
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,248,683
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         12,740
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5,290,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    2,230,912
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         1,399,236
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           1,376,000
<LOANS>                                        59,414,457
<ALLOWANCE>                                    588,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 74,808,094
<DEPOSITS>                                     64,898,292
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            331,023
<LONG-TERM>                                    50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,482,364
<OTHER-SE>                                       46,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 74,808,094
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,993,171
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              161,617
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               163,370
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,318,158
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,907,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,908,469
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,409,689
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  198,519
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,965,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                543,155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     494,079
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   494,079
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 5.55
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   2,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               397,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  8,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              588,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           588,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification
I, Carl J. Grivner, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XO Communications,Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting
Date: August 14, 2003
 _________________________Carl J. Grivner
#### Robert C. RIGGS, Appellant, v. W. C. TADLOCK et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 15, 1954.

Strother Kiser, Lexington, for appellant.

George R. Smith, Lexington, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment denying Dr. Robert C. Riggs the right to recover the sum of $861.42, jointly and severally, from W. C. Tadlock and Mrs. Maxie Jones for professional services. The lower court directed a verdict for Dr. Riggs for the sum of $93.56 against each of the above two persons. We have read the record and we conclude the evidence fully sustains the action of the trial judge.

The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Fortified Holdings
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Brendan Reilly, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|October 31, 2008 | By:
      /s/ Brendan Reilly
|---------------- | ----------------------------
|                 | Brendan Reilly              
|                 | Principal Executive Officer 

---
Exhibit 4.351

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 168612 dated December 30, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 30, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated September 14, 2018 No. 660-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

5/20/13

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Test Procedure Meeting with the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the 

Global Automakers

FROM: Christopher Laroo

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

This memo documents a meeting held on 5/20/13 between representatives of the Alliance of 

Automobile Manufacturers, Global Automakers, and EPA to discuss light-duty vehicle test 

procedures in 40 CFR parts 1065 and 1066. The meeting attendees are enclosed.

The discussion topics included testing on 4 wheel drive dynamometers, test fuel equivalency, 

and parts 1065/1066.
#### Peter Minott, Plaintiff, v Dora Nurse et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, on Behalf of Dora Nurse et al., Respondents, v Hanover Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

In consolidated actions to recover damages for personal injuries (action No. 1), and for a judgment declaring, *inter alia,*that the Hanover Insurance Company must defend and indemnify Dora and Antonio Nurse in the personal injury action (action No. 2), the Hanover Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), dated March 24, 1989, which denied its motion denominated as one to vacate an order of the same court, dated August 15, 1988, and entered upon its default, granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in action No. 2 declaring, *inter alia,*that it must defend and indemnify the defendants in action No. 1.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant’s motion, denominated as one to vacate an order on the ground of excusable default, was actually one for reargument of its prior motion for the same relief *(see, Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558). Since no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue, the appeal is dismissed *(see, McKay v H.I.P of Greater N. Y.,*163 AD2d 280; *Anchor Sav. Bank v Alpha Developers,*143 AD2d 711). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.25


 


Supplementary Agreement of Equity Transfer Agreement 


 


Party A: Xi’an
TCH Energy Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Hongyuan Huifu
Venture Capital Co., Ltd.


 


Party C: Hongyuan Recycling
Energy Investment Management (Beijing) Co., Ltd.


 


Whereas, Party A and
Party B signed the Equity Transfer Agreement on, this supplementary agreement is about the payment of the equity transfer price:


 


1. As of the execution
date of the agreement, according to the Financial Consulting Service Agreement signed by Party A and Party C on July, 2014, Party
A still owes Party B RMB 18,306,666.67 of consulting fee unpaid.


 


2. As of the execution
date of the agreement, Party B owes Party A RMB 3,453,867.31 of equity transfer fee.


 


3. All parties agree
to offset the consulting fee by the equity transfer fee. After the offset, the creditor’s rights and debt relationship of the parties
shall be changed to: Party A owes Party C RMB 14,852,799.36 of consulting fee; Party B owes Party C RMB 3,453,867.31 of consulting
fee; The equity transfer fee is deemed to be paid by Party B to Party A.


 


4. Any matters not mentioned
in this agreement shall be subject to the Equity Transfer Agreement and the Financial Consulting Service Agreement.


 


5. The agreement becomes
effective upon the signing of the agreement by the parties.


 


6. The agreement is
in three counterparts and each party holds one copy with the same legal effect.


 






    第 1 页 / 共 2 页


     


    

 


Party A: Xi’an
TCH Energy Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Legal Representative:


 


Party B: Hongyuan Huifu
Venture Capital Co., Ltd.


 


Legal Representative:


 


Party C: Hongyuan Recycling
Energy Investment Management (Beijing) Co., Ltd.


 


Legal Representative:


 


 


第 2 页
/ 共 2 页