alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. 26567.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with having violated the liquor laws in Lamar County, Texas, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $400.00 and confinement in the county jail for 100 days.

The complaint attempts not only to charge the original offense committed on the 25th day of February, 1953, but also four previous convictions of the alleged same character.

We are met early herein with a motion to quash the information because it is alleged that same is based upon an improper complaint. The complaint reads in part as follows:

> “In the Name and by the Authority of the State of Texas:

> “Before Me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared W. G. Poplin, who, after being by me duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That heretofore, to-wit: on or about the 25th day of February, A.D., 1953,, and before the making and filing of this Complaint, in the County of Lamar and State of Texas, - defendant, in said County and State, did then and there unlawfully transport an intoxicating beverage, to-wit, whiskey, in a dry area, to-wit: Lamar County, Texas, after an election had been held,”' etc.

The information contains the name-of Charlie Simmons in the 'blank left in the complaint, but the information must be based upon a complaint; and in the complaint hereinabove set out no person is alleged to have -committed an offense against the law.

Under the condition in which we find the record, the information should have-been quashed because it is based upon an insufficient complaint.

The judgment is therefore reversed and. the prosecution ordered dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1831 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1831

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2011

   Mr. Paul (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Clay, Mr. 
Cohen, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Farr, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, 
 Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. McClintock, Mr. McDermott, Mr. George 
Miller of California, Mr. Moran, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. 
Polis, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Stark, Ms. Woolsey, and Mr. 
  Kucinich) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINITION OF MARIHUANA.

    Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (16)--
                    (A) by striking ``(16) The'' and inserting 
                ``(16)(A) The''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) The term `marihuana' does not include industrial 
        hemp.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(57) The term `industrial hemp' means the plant Cannabis 
        sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, 
        with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more 
        than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.''.

SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION.

    Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Industrial Hemp Determination.--If a person grows or 
processes Cannabis sativa L. for purposes of making industrial hemp in 
accordance with State law, the Cannabis sativa L. shall be deemed to 
meet the concentration limitation under section 102(57).''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John A. Roberts,certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of InfoLogix, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.      Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.      Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.      Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.      All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.      Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: March 29,2007

| /s/  JOHN A. ROBERTS    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John A. Roberts         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2165 

To repeal the trade adjustment assistance programs under the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2011 

Mr. ROSS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal the trade adjustment assistance programs under 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 

4 PROGRAMS UNDER THE TRADE ACT OF 1974. 

5 (a) REPEAL.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 

7 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271 

8 et seq.) are repealed. 

9 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of 

10 contents for the Trade Act of 1974 is amended by 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2165 IH

1 striking the items relating to chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, and 

2 6 of title II of such Act. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) PUBLIC LAW 111–5.—Parts I, II, III, IV, 

5 and V of subtitle I of title I of the American Recov6 ery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 (Public Law 

7 111–5; 123 Stat. 367) are repealed. 

8 (2) PUBLIC LAW 111–344.—Subtitle A of title I 

9 of the Omnibus Trade Act of 2010 (Public Law 

10 111–344; 124 Stat. 3611) is repealed. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2079

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ``John J. Cook 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Cook Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Cook Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   February 7, 2011 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell       |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                           | **Gregory A. Shortell**       |
|                           | ***Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



         NAME                                     JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         ----                                     -----------------------------
<S>                                               <C>
Hadco Foreign Sales Corporation                   U.S. Virgin Islands
Hadco Santa Clara, Inc.                           Delaware
Hadco Corporation (Malaysia) SDN. BHD.            Malaysia
Zycon Corporation                                 Delaware
Hadco Phoenix, Inc.                               Delaware
CCIR of California Corp.                          California
CCIR of Texas Corp.                               Texas
Continental Circuits International, Inc.          Barbados
Continental Circuits Corp.                        Delaware
Hadco Scotland Limited                            Scotland
Hadco Ireland Limited                             Ireland
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATIONS (cont'd)
           (Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             15 U.S.C. Section 78m)

I, Deborah F. McLeod, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Chestatee
Bancshares, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Chestatee Bancshares,
Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
         a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors:
         a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


Date: May 10, 2004               BY: /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
                                     ---------------------
                                     Deborah F. McLeod, CFO and Treasurer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 10,  2010 | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant                                      |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |  

**Douglas G. Bryant*****Chief Financial Officer*** |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1







                         Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Tofutti Brands Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Nos.  33-72654,  333-48605 and 333-79567) on Form S-8 of Tofutti Brands Inc. of
our report  dated March 21,  2002,  relating  to the  balance  sheets of Tofutti
Brands  Inc.  as of  December  29,  2001 and  December  30, 2000 and the related
statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the
years then ended, which report appears in the December 29, 2001 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Tofutti Brands Inc.

                               /s/ Wiss & Company
                               WISS & COMPANY, LLP


Livingston, New Jersey
April 10, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Petroleum Company as of
September 30, 1999, and the related consolidated statement of income
for the nine months ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                        19
<INVENTORY>                                        575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,779
<PP&E>                                          22,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,590
<BONDS>                                          4,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              650
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           287
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,191
<SALES>                                          9,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,539
<CGS>                                            7,857<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,093<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    697
<INCOME-TAX>                                       338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       359
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<FN>
<F1> Purchased crude oil and products + Production and operating expenses +
     Exploration expenses + Depreciation, depletion and amortization.
<F2> CGS + Property impairments + Taxes other than income taxes.
<F3> Preferred dividend requirements of capital trusts.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of QMed Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-K
for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), Michael W. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and William T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/  Michael W. Cox
----------------------------
Michael W. Cox
Chief Executive Officer
February 10, 2006



/s/  William T. Schmitt, Jr.
----------------------------
William T. Schmitt, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2006

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to QMed Inc. and will be retained by QMed Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]