alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-13;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. Lamale
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 (TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LOGO) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Maurice B. Tosé, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (the Registrant), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that: (1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Maurice B. ToséMaurice B. ToséDate: December 8, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.28 

Change in Control Agreement Amendment2

	Effective October 4, 2004, this Amendment amends theChange in Control Agreement, as amended effective April 15, 2001, (the"Agreement"), entered into as of March 7, 2000 by and between GeorgeKadifa, an individual ("Executive") and Corio, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the "Company").

	For good and valuable consideration, the receipt andsufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.  Section 6.   Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby deletedin its entirety and replaced with the following:

"6.	Term of Agreement.  This Agreement shall commence as ofthe date first set forth above and shall continue until the date (the"Termination Date") which is the earlier of (i) the date thatExecutive ceases to be an employee of the Company, for any reason, and (ii)December 31, 2007.  Any benefits accruing to Executive under Section 1 hereofprior to or upon the Termination Date shall survive termination of theAgreement, and any obligations of Executive under Sections 1, 4 and 5 hereofshall survive any such termination."

The remaining provisions of the Agreementremain in full force and effect.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed thisAgreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of theday and year first above written.

			

COMPANY

	

CORIO, INC.

			

By:      /s/   BRETT WHITE
Brett White

Executive Vice President and CFO
**				

EXECUTIVE**
	

    /s/ GEORGE KADIFA

GeorgeKadifa
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00782

- CR

Robert TORRES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR1875

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED February 4, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00013-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-006790-1

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

ALEXANDER OMEKE, Appellant

V.

CURRENT AT THE GRID D/B/A CURRENT AT THE GRID, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On May 23, 2023, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the 

appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the 

court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 22, 2023
#### Robert Ray ROBERSON, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27325.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.

No statements of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term is probated.'

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Molecular Evolution, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
--------------------------------

William D. Huse, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2003
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEPHEN JEAN-JACQUES and ROSE GERTA JEAN-JACQUES,

Appellants,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS 

TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE ALTERNATIVE 

LOAN TRUST 2006-41CB, MORTAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-41CB,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-535

[December 19, 2019]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE16-004153.

Stephen Jean-Jacques and Rose Gerta Jean-Jaques, Hallandale 

Beach, pro se.

Jason Joseph of Tromberg Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
...:,...._.,......,,,,:„i&^.-i^j^^i!S^t^ifa^^'^>j^f^f<^ ^^'fi#^^ft^.^^i.^y^;i5,:ipd«t^»j-4?'•

Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issued November 16,1999

In The

Court nf Appeals

Jfiftty Utatntt of Gtexaa at Dallas

No. 05-99-01632-CR

No. 05-99-01633-CR

MORRIS WAYNE PRICE, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F94-35504-N & F92-04612-N

Wifi

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill

Appellant has filed amotion to withdraw the appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved

the motion.

This Court hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the appeal withdrawn and that

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47
Fifth Court of Appeals

Case Attorney Address List

Page: 1

Date Printed: 11/16/1999

Case Number: 05-99-01633-CR Date Filed: 09/29/1999

Style: Price, Morris Wayne

v.

The State of Texas

Trial Judge:

Trial Court Reporter:

Trial Court: 195TH DISTRICT COURT Trial County: DALLAS

APP Bill Ashe

ATT 001373600

8111 Preston Road

Suite 600

Dallas, Tx 75225

Phone / -

Fax / -

STA William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr.

ATT 009669000

ATTN: APPELLATE SECTION

Frank Crowley Courts Bldg., 10th FL

133 N. Industrial Blvd. LB 19

Dallas, TX 75207

Phone 214/653-3845

Fax
#### FAULKNER v. STATE.

No. 23314.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 13, 1946.

E. T. Miller, of Amarillo, and H. M. Hood, of Borger, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for burglary; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The State’s case depends upon the confessions of the appellant — one, oral, and the other, written. The admissibility of the confessions is challenged.

It would serve no useful purpose to detail the facts touching the making of the confessions. It is sufficient, to say that, according to the admissions of the officers, appellant made the confessions after having been slapped, knocked down, and confined in a dark or dungeon-like cell by the officers having him in custody — all with the purpose and view of making him confess.

Confessions taken under such circumstances are violative of the due process provisions of our State and Federal Constitutions, Vernon’s Ann.St.Const. art. 1, § 19; Const. U.S.Amend. 14, and should not be received in evidence. Attesting authorities, both by this court and the Supreme Court of United States, are numerous. We call attention only to: Abston v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 102 S.W.2d 428; Blackshear v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 557, 95 S.W.2d 960; Sigler v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 167, 139 S.W.2d 277; Colley v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 390, 158 S.W.2d 1014; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, 56 S.Ct. 461, 80 L.Ed. 682; Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 60 S.Ct. 472, 84 L.Ed. 716.

Attention is again called to what we said in Abston’s case, viz. [102 S.W.2d 430]: “It is unfortunate that officers in their zeal sometimes go about obtaining confessions on the apparent idea that the ‘end justifies the means,’ thereby defeating the very thing they hope to accomplish.”

 Because the confessions were not admissible in evidence, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 20, 2007
#### J. C. GABBERT, Appellant, v. W. S. BLACKSHEAR, Appellee.

No. 3242.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Jan. 10, 1955.

Ned Whitt, Waco, for appellant.

Carl C. Anderson, Waco, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the District Court of McLennan County, Texas. The record reflects that the cause was tried before a jury and judgment thereafter entered by the court; that thereafter appellant gave notice of appeal and filed an appeal bond, but has brought no record other than the above before this court. Both parties have by agreed motion moved that this cause be affirmed.

In view of the foregoing the cause is hereby affirmed.

It is further ordered that mandate issue without delay.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2006
|----------------------



| | /s/ Michelle A. Green
Michelle A. Green
Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 15540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 15

[ET Docket No. 18-295 and GN Docket No. 17-183; FCC 23-86; FR ID 
192755]


Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band; and Expanding Flexible Use in 
Mid-Band Spectrum Between 3.7 and 24 GHz; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission is correcting the docket 
numbers for commenters under the preamble section titled, ADDRESSES, of 
the proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register on February 26, 
2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Oros of the Office of 
Engineering and Technology, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e70575d5651525f4d10714c514d7e585d5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ade3c4cec5c2c1ccde83e2dfc2deedcbcece83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-418-0636.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2023-28620 in the Federal Register of February 26, 2024, 
the following correction is made: On page 14016 in the first column and 
first sentence in ADDRESSES of the preamble, ``ET Docket No. 13-115 and 
RM-11341'' is corrected to read ``ET Docket No. 18-295 and GN Docket 
No. 17-183''.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-04494 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Leta PIERCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27517.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment assessed is a fine of $450.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All •proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended May 6, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  June 12, 2007



|By:   | /s/ Emanuel Chirico                     | 
|----- | --------------------------------------- | 
|Name: | Emanuel Chirico
Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC-12-0000962 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LETITIA HARTER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000962; CR. NO. 11-1-1063)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Letitia Harter’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on March 24, 2014, is

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk

regarding scheduling. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 7, 2014.

Alen M. Kaneshiro

for Petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/S/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000962

07-MAY-2014

09:50 AM
#### TEAL v. STATE.

No. 26734.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

Theo. Ash, Abilene, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*261MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the possession of beer and whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale, with a prior conviction alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, a fine of $100.

One Meek testified that he had received a quantity of beer and whiskey from the appellant. He was asked this question, “Was that here in Taylor County, Texas, that you got it from him?’.’ to which he answered, “That I could not say.”

We have searched the record and find, no other proof as to where the offense occurred.

In violations of laws adopted by local option elections, the locus of the offense is an integral part of the proof. Sims v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 247 S.W.2d 1022.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### KNIGHT v. STATE.

No. 26817.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1954.

*100No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ■

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is upon a plea of guilty before the court on a charge of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, á fine of $75.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception arid nothing is presented for 'review ’ by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), I, James P. Walker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 12, 2010 /s/James P. Walker, Jr.     Chief Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Speedhaul Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, Andrew Norins, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Speedhaul Holdings, Inc. Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Speedhaul Holdings, Inc. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

 

Dated: July 25, 2006

 

**SPEEDHAUL HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

By: */s/ Andrew Norins*

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer