alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2027 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. CICILLINE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton 

Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Sachuest 

6 Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy 

7 Pond Unit RI–06, Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’, included 

8 in the set of maps entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal BarVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:39 Jun 02, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2027.IH H2027

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2027 IH

1 rier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

2 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and 

3 relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Re4 sources System units in Rhode Island, is hereby replaced 

5 by another map relating to the units entitled ‘‘John H. 

6 Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point 

7 Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

8 Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’ and dated 

9 September 30, 2009. 

10 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

11 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

12 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

13 the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Re14 sources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1          Certification.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc. pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C.
63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  August 18, 2004
(signed)  _______________________
Edward  Alexander
/s/  Edward  Alexander
Chief  Executive  Officer  of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.


<PAGE>
3 Attachments 

Dear Dr. Edelstein,

Your understanding is correct. 3M intends to import tetrabromobisphenol A only for research and development 

purposes at this time, and we do not consider this information to be CBI.

Best Regards, 

Jon M. Gerber | Senior Regulatory Analyst 

3M Medical Department - Material EHS 

3M Center, 220-6E-03 | St. Paul, MN 55144 

Office: 651 733 0226 | Fax: 651 733 1773

jmgerber1@mmm.com | www.3M.com

Edelstein.Rebecca---09/27/2011 08:03:42 AM---Dear Mr. Gerber: As we discussed yesterday by phone, your 

letter dated September 14, 2011

Re: waiver request under 40 CFR 766 

jmgerber1 

to: 

Rebecca Edelstein 

09/27/2011 03:27 PM 

Cc: 

Lynn Vendinello 

Hide Details 

From: jmgerber1@mmm.com 

To: Rebecca Edelstein/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Lynn Vendinello/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

8C469176.gif graycol.gif ecblank.gif

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\redelste\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web6358.htm 9/27/2011
Dear Mr. Gerber: 

As we discussed yesterday by phone, your letter dated September 14, 2011 requesting a waiver from testing 

under 40 CFR 766.32(a)(2)(i) states that 3M intends to import less than 100 kilograms of tetrabromobisphenol A 

as part of an experimental product formulation for R&D purposes. However, the letter doesn't specify that 3M will 

exclusively use tetrabromobisphenol A for R&D purposes. I asked whether you could clarify whether the imported 

chemical will only be used for research and development purposes. You responded that yes, 3M intends to import 

tetrabromobisphenol A only for research and development purposes at this time. 

We also discussed whether 3M is making any CBI claims to this additional information, and you responded that 

3M is not making any CBI claims. 

Please confirm my understanding by responding to this email message. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Rebecca Edelstein, Ph.D., Chemist 

Fibers and Organics Branch 

National Program Chemicals Division 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (7404T) 

Washington, DC 20460

Phone: 202-564-8566

Fax: 202-566-0473

From:

Edelstein.Rebecca@epamail.epa.gov

To:

jmgerber1@mmm.com

Cc: Vendinello.Lynn@epamail.epa.gov

Date:

09/27/2011 08:03 AM

Subject:

waiver request under 40 CFR 766

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\redelste\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web6358.htm 9/27/2011
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2087 

AN ACT 

To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in 

the Atlantic District, Accomack County, Virginia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2087 EH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 (a) REMOVAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

4 shall execute such instruments as may be necessary to re5 move all deed restrictions described in subsection (b) relat6 ing to the parcel of land described in subsection (c). 

7 (b) DEED RESTRICTIONS.—The deed restrictions re8 ferred to in subsection (a) are those restrictions, including 

9 easements, exceptions, reservations, terms, conditions, and 

10 covenants described in Quitclaim Deed No. 17808A from 

11 the United States to Accomack County, Virginia, executed 

12 on December 20, 1976, and recorded among the real es13 tate records of Accomack County, Virginia, by the Clerk 

14 of the Circuit Court, on pages 292 through 296 of Deed 

15 Book 381. 

16 (c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re17 ferred to in subsection (a) consists of approximately 31.6 

18 acres situated in the Atlantic District, Accomack County, 

19 Virginia, more particularly described in the metes and 
3 

•HR 2087 EH

1 bounds description recorded on page 292 of the quitclaim 

2 deed described in subsection (b). 

Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2087 

AN ACT 

To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situVirginia. ated in the Atlantic District, Accomack County,
AFS-10-216-E 

May 7, 2010 

 Exemption No. 6140H 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12416 

Mr. Paul W. Railsback 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004-1707 

Dear Mr. Railsback: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6140, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 30, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (ATA), for an extension of Exemption 

No. 6140, as amended. That exemption from § 121.309(f)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows ATA-member airlines to locate the aft megaphone at door 4-left on their 

Boeing 747 aircraft. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATA. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6140, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6140, as amended, to 

August 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 6140, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 6140. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC17

- 1383

____________ CHARLES KENNETH FOSTER,

Appellant,

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 29, 2018]

PER CURIAM. We have for review Charles Kenneth Foster’s appeal of the circuit court’s order denying Foster’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Foster’s motion sought r elief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in
Hurst v. State ( Hurst ), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). This Court stayed Foster’s appe al pending the disposition of Hitchcock v.
State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017) . After this- 2

-

Court decided Hitchcock , Foster responded to this Court’s order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case. After reviewing Foster’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Foster is not entitled to relief. Foster was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of

e ight to four. Foster v. State , 654 So. 2d 112 , 113 (Fla. 1995). Foster’s sentence
of death became final in 1995. Foster v. Florida , 516 U.S. 920 (1995). Thus,
Hurst does not apply retroactively to Foster’s sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Foster’s motion. The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Foster , we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
v. State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock

. An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Bay County, Harry Hentz McClellan , Judge

- Case No. 031975CF000486XXAXMX- 3

-

James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Mark S. Gruber, Julie A. Morley , and Margaret S. Russell , Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida ; and Billy H. Nolas , Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps , Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for applicable date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Compliance, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action(s)

On February 14, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below. 
      ( print page 14933)          ( print page 14934)          ( print page 14935)    

Dated: February 14, 2024.

Bradley T. Smith,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-04241 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21


                                4-D NEUROIMAGING
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2000


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                          Jurisdiction          Percentage of
                                            in which          Voting Securities
                  Name                    Incorporated         Owned by Parent
<S>                                       <C>                 <C>

Biomagnetic Technologies GmbH (A)            Germany                 100%
Neuromag Oy (B)                              Finland                 100%
</TABLE>



     (A)  The subsidiary changed its name in October 1991. It was formerly known
          as S.H.E. Kryotechnische Instrumente und Systeme GmbH. Substantially
          all assets and liabilities of the subsidiary were transferred to
          Biomagnetic Technologies, Niedelassung, a branch of 4-D Neuroimaging
          on October 1, 1997.

     (B)  The company was acquired in December 1999.
Exhibit 4.342

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 166704 dated July 19, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 19, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 11, 2018 No. 529-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head

 
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS

COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION

IN THE SPHERE

OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
Exhibit 4.375

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF TELECOM, 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MASS COMMUNICATIONS

 

LICENSE

 

No. 170007 dated December 21, 2016

 

To render

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This license has been granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

“Mobile TeleSystems”

 

Legal Entity (Individual Entrepreneur) 
 Primary State Registration Number 
 (PSRN/OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN/INN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Principal place of business (residence):

 

109147, Moscow, Marksistskaya St., 4

 

The territory of the services is specified in appendix hereto.

 

This license is valid through:

 

December 20, 2021

 

This license is issued based on the decision of the licensing authority - Order No. 788-рчс dated November 16, 2018

 

This license has an appendix as an integral part, which is executed on two sheets

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
 
    	
/signature/ A.A. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official   seal:
   MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND
   MASS COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 18, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 427 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-229707) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 18, 2019
#### State of New York, Appellant, v Charter Craft Corporation, Respondent.

Mahoney, P. J.,

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McDermott, J.), entered August 9, 1989 in Albany County, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff appropriated property in the City of Rensselaer, Rensselaer County, in 1987. At the time of condemnation, defendant occupied the premises as a tenant paying $400 per month as rent. It remained in the premises until about August 1987. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover rent allegedly due and unpaid following the appropriation. Defendant answered, denying the material allegations of the com*585plaint. Plaintiff then moved for summary judgment, which Supreme Court denied. Plaintiff appeals.

Defendant argues that because of problems with the premises, there was no fair market value for its rental so that summary judgment properly was denied. Defendant, however, is statutorily liable for rent at the fair and reasonable value of the premises (EDPL 305 [A]) and, therefore, summary judgment on the issue of liability is appropriate. Because defendant has raised questions concerning the fair market value of the rent for the premises, we believe that an immediate hearing to determine damages is appropriate *(see,*CPLR 3212 [c]; *State of New York v Como Meat Packers,*124 AD2d 902, 903). Accordingly, the order denying summary judgment to plaintiff must be modified.

Order modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as denied plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability; summary judgment granted to plaintiff on the issue of liability; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14496-14497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 28, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. Bancorp of New Glarus, Inc., New Glarus, Wisconsin (Bancorp); to 
acquire First National Bank at Darlington, Darlington, Wisconsin 
(FNBD), through the merger of a newly formed subsidiary of Bancorp, 
Darlington Interim Bank, New Glarus, Wisconsin, with and into FNBD.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Joseph Cuenco, Assistant 
Vice President) Formations, Transactions & Enforcement, 101 Market 
Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to: [email protected]:
    1. Redemption Holding Company, Salt Lake City, Utah; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring Holladay Bank and Trust, Salt Lake 
City, Utah.

[[Page 14497]]

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-04025 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```