alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the amendment to quarterly report of
I-trax, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Frank A. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Frank A. Martin
-----------------------
Frank A. Martin
Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2004


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of TrueYou.com Inc. (the
Company) does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-K)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: November
20, 2007

| |                                                     |                 
| | --------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
| | /s/                                                 | Matthew
  Burris
| |                                                     |                 
| | Matthew Burris                                     
| | Chief
  Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer

---
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 521252 

________________________________

In the Matter of DAVID ROYE,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting 

Commissioner of Corrections 

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 19, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry and Lynch, JJ.

__________

David Roye, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence

County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of

Gouverneur Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of

violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a determination finding him guilty of stealing state

property in violation of a prison disciplinary rule. The

Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination

has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have

been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the

mandatory $5 surcharge has been ordered to be refunded to his

inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the

relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot
-2- 521252 

(see Matter of Shields v Prack, 131 AD3d 774, 775 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 22, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 22, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1241. HAROLD A. TRIP, JR. et al. v. RES-GA SEVEN, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
For the Docket

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters

Docket ID No. OW-2009-0596

Meeting with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)

November 4, 2010

In Attendance:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Ephraim King, OST

 Jim Keating, OST

 Jim Giattina, Region 4

 Carol Baschon, Region 4

 Joanne Benante, Region 4

 Annie Godfrey, Region 4

Florida Department of Environmental Protection – Jerry Brooks

 Drew Bartlett

Summary:

EPA chose to meet with FDEP to discuss the upcoming promulgation of final Water Quality

Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters. Specifically, FDEP and EPA 

discussed:

 The lakes modified criteria procedure

 Duration and frequency for the springs criterion

 Expression of downstream protection values

 Exclusion of sites with Dissolved Oxygen impairments from the stream benchmark 

distribution

 The frequency component of the streams criteria

No documents were shared between EPA and FDEP.
Exhibit 10.1(f)




PROXY
 
 WHEREAS, Chi Lin Technology Co., Ltd. ("Chi Lin"), an entity of the Republic of China (Taiwan), doing business at No. 18, Sheng Li 1st Street, Jen Te Hsiang, Tainan County 71758, Taiwan, Republic of China, is the owner of 6,043,704 shares (the "InMedica Shares") of restricted common stock of InMedica Development Corporation, a Utah corporation ("InMedica"); and
 WHEREAS, Larry Clark and Richard Bruggeman, former officers of InMedica, desire to acquire an irrevocable proxy to be able to vote the InMedica Shares owned by Chi Lin in any vote or consent of InMedica shareholders; and
 
 THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged:
 
 Chi Lin hereby appoints Larry Clark and Richard Bruggeman, and any successors of them, with full power of substitution, its proxy to vote the InMedica Shares for a period commencing with the date hereof through and including May 28, 2010, at any shareholders' meeting or any consent resolution of the shareholders of InMedica, without restriction except any vote by the proxies must be unanimous. This Proxy is coupled with an interest in that Clark and Bruggeman are creditors of InMedica and continue to forebear collection of amounts owing to them based on, among other things, this Proxy being granted to enhance their security for debts due to them.  Mr. Clark and Bruggeman agree that they will be responsible to report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission any change in their beneficial ownership in InMedica caused by this Proxy, pursuant to the appropriate forms under Section 16A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Williams Act of the federal securities laws.
 
 Dated the 28th day of January, 2010.
 CHI LIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD/s/ Yeou-Geng HsuYeou-Geng Hsu, President
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2167 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2167

 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to change the threshold 
    number of shareholders for required registration under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2011

 Mr. Schweikert (for himself, Mr. Himes, Mr. Canseco, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
   Jones, Mr. Perlmutter, Mrs. Biggert, and Mr. Issa) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to change the threshold 
    number of shareholders for required registration under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Company Flexibility and 
Growth Act''.

SEC. 2. THRESHOLD FOR REGISTRATION.

    Section 12(g)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 
U.S.C. 78l(g)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``shall--'' and all that 
follows through ``register'' and insert ``shall, within 120 days after 
the last day of its first fiscal year ended on which the issuer has 
total assets exceeding $10,000,000 and a class of equity security 
(other than an exempted security) held of record by 1,000 persons, 
register''.

SEC. 3. ACCREDITED INVESTORS AND EMPLOYEES.

    Section 12(g)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78l(g)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For 
purposes of determining whether an issuer is required to register a 
security with the Commission pursuant to paragraph (1), the definition 
of `held of record' shall not include securities held by persons who 
qualify as accredited investors (as that term is defined by the 
Commission) or securities that are held by persons who received the 
securities pursuant to an employee compensation plan in transactions 
exempted from the registration requirements of section 5 of the 
Securities Act of 1933.''.

SEC. 4. COMMISSION RULEMAKING.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise the definition 
of ``held of record'' pursuant to section 12(g)(5) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(g)(5)) to implement the amendment 
made by section 2. The Commission shall also adopt safe harbor 
provisions that issuers can follow when determining whether holders of 
their securities are accredited investors or that holders of their 
securities received the securities pursuant to an employee compensation 
plan in transactions that were exempt from the registration 
requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Vance Williams, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, who was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, argues on appeal that the court erred in denying his request to charge the defense of temporary possession of a weapon for lawful purposes. We reject defendant’s argument that such a charge was required because his possession of a weapon, although concededly without a permit, was for the purposes of engaging in a sport, i.e., target practice in an abandoned quarry *(see, People v Banks,*76 NY2d 799; *People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126, 130; *People v Williams,*50 NY2d 1043, 1045; *cf., People v Whitehead,*123 AD2d 895).

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—criminal possession of weapon, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: May 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 97)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20my10-31]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Pending Decisional Matters: (a) Baby Walkers Final Rule; and (b) 
Revocation of the Ban of Certain Baby Walkers.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12278 Filed 5-18-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1816 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2011 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Segal AmeriCorps 

5 Education Award Tax Relief Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS 

7 EDUCATIONAL AWARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1816 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(e) AMERICORPS EDUCATIONAL AWARDS.—Gross 

4 income shall not include any national service educational 

5 award described in subtitle D of title I of the National 

6 and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 

7 et seq.).’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

July 22, 2011 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Allison Transmission 

FROM: Cleophas Jackson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162 

This memorandum documents meetings held on October 6, 2010 and November 18, 2010 

between Allison Transmission and EPA and included the following individuals: 

Allison Transmission: Laurie Tuttle, Tony Green, Melissa Sauer, Kevin Rodgers, and 

John Haley 

EPA: Cleophas Jackson, Allen Duncan, James Sanchez, Ryan Szpara, Chien Sze, Peter 

Smith, William Courtois, James Smith, and Carl Ryan. 

The discussion focused primarily on Allison’s feedback on powerpack testing versus powertrain 

testing versus whole vehicle chassis testing and recommendations for testing with their 

conventional / hybrid transmission(s). EPA provided an update on HILS GTR.
#### ELKHORN COAL CORP. et al. v. JOHNSON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 18, 1953.

J. Woodford Howard, Fred G. Francis, Prestonsburg, for appellants.

Napier & Napier, Hazard, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Luther Johnson sued the Elkhorn Coal Corporation for damages to his house and water well alleged to have resulted from the mining of coal under his premises by the coal company. He recovered a judgment in the amount of $4,000. On appeal to this Court the judgment was reversed. Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. Johnson, Ky., *249*S.W.2d 745. In the opinion it was pointed out that the deed of mineral rights to the coal company expressly granted the company the right to remove pillars and other subjacent supports, and released the company of any liability for damage to the surface of the land. This Court held that, in view of the terms of the deed, the company could be held liable only upon proof that it conducted its mining operation in an arbitrary, wanton or malicious manner, and since the case had not been tried on that theory, it was remanded for a new trial.

*125Upon the second trial, the jury awarded damages in the sum of $2,000, under an appropriate instruction: requiring the jury to find that the company’s conduct was arbitrary, wanton or malicious; From the judgment entered upon that verdict the company has again appealed, maintaining that it was entitled to a directed verdict.

Taking Johnson’s evidence in its most favorable light, it establishes only that the company removed coal from a seam some 12 feet below the basement floor of Johnson’s house, against Johnson’s wishes and despite his protests. There is absolutely no evidence that the company conducted the mining work in a reckless or wanton, or even negligent manner. On the contrary, the proof is uncontradicted that the company used only light charges of dynamite, after cutting below the seam with an electric cutting machine, and that the entries were heavily timbered.

Under its deed, the company had the right to remove coal from beneath Johnson’s house, without leaving any pillars or subjacent supports. The mere exercise of that right cannot of itself be classified as arbitrary, wanton or malicious conduct. Isaacs v. Inland Steel Co., 305 Ky. 777, 205 S.W.2d 681.

It is clear from our decisions that it is the *mcmner*of the mining operation, rather that the mere fact of carrying on the operation, that will determine the liability for damages in cases of this nature. Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. Johnson, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 745; Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. Yonts, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 384.

It is our opinion that the coal company was entitled to a directed verdict, and if upon another trial the evidence is substantially the same the court will direct a verdict for the company.

The judgment is reversed, for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

COMBS, J., not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,473,027
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          39,808
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 40,385,552
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     92,133,344
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,257,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,482,678
<DEPOSITS>                                 125,770,247
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,630,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,569,216
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,484,560
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,028,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             146,482,215
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,870,904
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,384,862
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                36,097
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,291,863
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,809,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,947,047
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,344,816
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,130,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 697
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,347,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                456,262
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     456,262
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   465,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.88
<LOANS-NON>                                    869,625
<LOANS-PAST>                                   151,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                860,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,246,480
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,188,521
<RECOVERIES>                                    69,954
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,257,913
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,155,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        103,000


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Walker, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ James P. Walker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 22, 2006