alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


[LOGO] OPTION ONE                                               [LOGO] H&R BLOCK
       MORTGAGE

       an H&R BLOCK company

Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.
390 Greenwich Street, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Mortgage Finance

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
1761 East St. Andrew Place
Santa Ana, California 92705
Trust Administration CIO501
March 10, 2006
Inv#294

Re:   Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-OPT1 Asset Backed Pass-Through
      Certificates Series 2005-OPT1

      Pursuant to Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated and
effective as of February 1, 2005, among Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., as
Depositor, Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company as Trustee, (the "Servicing Agreement"), enclosed is the
required officer's certificate of compliance.

If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226 or
email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com


Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618



www.optiononeonline.com
                     6501 Irvine Center Drive o Irvine o California o 92618-2304
                                        o 949.790.3600 o Fax 949.790.8581 [LOGO]

<page>

                           OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SERVICER


      I, Fabiola Camperi, the duly appointed Chief Servicing Officer of Option
One Mortgage Corporation, the Servicer, hereby certify that (i) a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 and
of performance under the Servicing Agreement, as defined in the cover letter,
has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Servicing Agreement during such year.

                                    By: /s/ Fabiola Camperi
                                        --------------------------
                                    Name: Fabiola Camperi
                                    Title: Chief Servicing Officer
                                    Date: February 28, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2079

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ``John J. Cook 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2011

  Mrs. McCarthy of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ``John J. Cook 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Cook Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Cook Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2246 

To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such time as Brazil 

amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of nationals 

of Brazil to other countries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2011 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such 

time as Brazil amends its laws to remove the prohibition 

on extradition of nationals of Brazil to other countries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brazilian Foreign Aid 

5 Fairness Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2246 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE TO 

2 BRAZIL UNTIL BRAZIL AMENDS ITS LAWS TO 

3 REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON EXTRADITION 

4 OF NATIONALS OF BRAZIL TO OTHER COUN5 TRIES. 

6 (a) SUSPENSION OF ASSISTANCE.—Notwithstanding 

7 any other provision of law, no funds made available to any 

8 Federal department or agency may be used to provide as9 sistance to Brazil until the President determines and cer10 tifies to Congress that the Government of Brazil has 

11 amended its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition 

12 of nationals of Brazil to other countries. 

13 (b) WAIVER.—The President may waive the applica14 tion of subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis if the Presi15 dent determines and certifies to Congress that is in the 

16 national interests of the United States to do so. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act takes effect on the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect 

19 to funds made available to any Federal department or 

20 agency for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
      Abdoulline, as a Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





By: /S/ Albert AbdoullineAlbert
                  Abdoulline
                CFO
                Date:
                   August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 215 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 215

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and title I of 
    the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 while 
 preserving the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2011

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
   Committees on Education and the Workforce, Ways and Means, House 
Administration, Rules, the Judiciary, and Appropriations, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and title I of 
    the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 while 
 preserving the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PPACA AND RECONCILIATION; PRESERVATION OF INDIAN 
              HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ACT REAUTHORIZATION.

    Effective as of the last day of the 60-day period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
        Law 111-148), except for section 10221 (relating to the Indian 
        Health Care Improvement Reauthorization and Extension Act of 
        2009), is repealed and the provisions of law amended or 
        repealed by such Act (except for provisions of law amended or 
        repealed by such section) are restored or revived as of such 
        day; and
            (2) title I of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
        Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152) is repealed and the provisions 
        of law amended or repealed by such title are restored or 
        revived as of such day.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1773. RAY v. THE STATE.

Cecil Ray filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing his

motion to vacate a void judgment, and the appeal was docketed on July 9, 2021. 

Ray’s brief of appellant was due 20 days later, on July 29, 2021. The due date has

passed, and Ray has not filed a brief. Accordingly, Ray’s appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for failure to file a brief. See Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 13, 2021

08/13/2021
#### FULLYLOVE v. STATE.

No. 26557.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1953.

Thomas H. Howard and W. R. Sessions, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Criminal Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas, of the offense of transporting an alcoholic beverage, etc., on a public street and highway in Justice Precinct No. 2 of said county, it being alleged that said precinct was a dry area.

In order to enhance the punishment in the event of a conviction, the State pleaded three previous convictions, claiming the same to have been of a like or similar character.

It is noted that in the original charge herein the appellant is claimed to have transported wine and whisky in said dry area.

The first offense attempted to be utilized for enhancement purposes charged appellant with having been duly, legally and finally convicted in Cause No. 1491-B in said court. It is evident from the record presented to us that said cause is based upon the charge that appellant possessed for the purpose of sale beer and untaxed beer without having a license issued by the proper Liquor Control Board authorizing the possession of such beer.

The second offense pleaded for the purpose of enhancing the penalty is Cause No. 679-B in this same court in which appellant was charged with and duly convicted in said cause of transporting an alcoholic beverage, to-wit, whisky, in a wet area without a permit.

The third allegation offered for the purpose of enhancement of the punishment is based upon Cause No. 361-B in the same court, the charge therein being the unlawful possession of liquor for the purpose of sale without having a permit issued by the Liquor Control Board of this State authorizing the sale and possession of such liquor.

It will be noted that none of the matters offered for the purpose of enhancing the punishment referred to the possession or transportation or sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, but all enhancement offerings are concerned with the handling of liquor without a proper permit relative thereto'.

We recently held in Graham v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 260 S.W.2d 887, that the first obligation therein charged against the accused was a prohibitory regulation and that the remaining three regulations set forth and proven against him were regulatory in *712their nature and merely regulated the lawful sale or possession oí intoxicating liquor. See Andrews v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 392, 228 S.W.2d 173; and Lenore v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 417, 129 S.W.2d 657.

Under the authority of these cases, we think the last three convictions offered for the purpose of enhancing the punishment should not have been utilized therefor, the primary offense being for transporting intoxicating liquor in a dry area.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MANUFACTURING RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDS

AMERICA, INC., INDUSTRIAL ENCLOSURES

CORPORATION, dba Palmer Digital Group, COATES US INC.,

Intervenors

______________________

2024

- 1749

______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1331

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: Case: 24-1749 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 08/29/2024M ANUFACTURING R ESOURCES I NTERNATIONAL

, I NC

. V

. ITC 2

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.
P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 29, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 29, 2024 Case: 24-1749 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 08/29/2024
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V.,
Appellant

v.

ERICSSON, INC.,
Appellee

______________________

2023

- 2217

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022

- 00079

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 23-2217 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 01/24/2024K ONINKLIJKE KPN N.V. V

. E RICSSON

, I NC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

January 24, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 24, 2024 Case: 23-2217 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 01/24/2024
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Petition for exemption/rulemaking. Please see

corresponding attachments.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance

 

Onyx Acceptance Corporation

27051 Towne Centre Drive

Foothill Ranch, CA 92610

 

And

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.

StructuredFinance

4New York Plaza

6thStreet

NewYork, NY 10001

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report of Management on Compliance*, that OnyxAcceptance Corporation (“Onyx”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital One AutoFinance, Inc. (“COAF”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital OneFinancial Corporation, complied in all material respects for the year ended December 31, 2005 withthe requirements of Sections 2.04(a),2.04(b), 3.07, 3.08(a), 3.09(a), 4.02(a), and 4.02 (e) of the Sales and Servicing Agreement dated asof February 03, 2005 regarding the Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-A Class ANotes (the “Agreement”), which was filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on Form 8-K on March 1, 2005. Management is responsible for Onyx’scompliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion about Onyx’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Onyx’s compliance withthose requirements and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on Onyx’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Onyx complied with the aforementionedSections of the Agreement as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
|                           |
| March 30, 2006            |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 42 (Friday, March 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1232 (Enforcement)]


Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and Packaging Thereof; Correction 
Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Correction is made to the investigation number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 16, 2023 (88 FR 78786-87) in FR 
Doc. 2023-25279, on page 78786, in the first column, the investigation 
number should read:

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1232].

    Issued: February 26, 2024.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-04289 Filed 2-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15566-15567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP24-27-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Staff Protest to 
Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) staff 
(Protestor) hereby protests the prior notice request filed under the 
provisions of the Commission's regulations at part 157, subpart F, by 
Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) on December 15, 2023, 
in the above-referenced docket. Pursuant to its Part 157, subpart F, 
blanket certificate authority, Kern River proposes to construct and 
operate the Lanes Crossing Meter Station (Project), within Kern River's 
existing Victorville Meter Station at the High Desert Power Plant, San 
Bernardino County, California. Protestor seeks to have this prior 
notice request processed as a case-specific application filed under 
section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157, subpart A, of 
the Commission's regulations.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 157.205(f) provides that a protested prior notice 
filing shall be treated as though it had filed a case-specific 
application under NGA section 7, unless, pursuant to section 
157.205(g), the protestor withdraws its protest within 30 days after 
protests were due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Protestor notes that Kern River did not provide a copy of a finding 
by the California State Historic Preservation

[[Page 15567]]

Office of ``no historic properties'' or ``no historic properties 
effected.'' This documentation is necessary to demonstrate the 
Project's compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as 
required under the Commission's regulations at section 157.208(c)(9) 
and Appendix II of subpart F. Without this documentation, the 
environmental concerns cannot be adequately addressed before the 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
protest period expires on February 26, 2024.

    Dated: February 26, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-04416 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 12



   PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                       TOTAL ENTERPRISE

      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                                      Millions of Dollars
                                                   ------------------------
                                                       Six Months Ended
                                                            June 30
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   1999                1998
                                                   ------------------------
                                                          (Unaudited)
  Earnings Available for Fixed Charges
    Income before income taxes                     $283                 771
    Distributions less than equity in earnings
      of less-than-fifty-percent-owned companies     (2)                 (2)
    Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
      interest*                                     205                 143
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   $486                 912
  =========================================================================

  Fixed Charges
    Interest and expense on indebtedness,
      excluding capitalized interest               $147                  89
    Capitalized interest                             21                  26
    Preferred dividend requirements of
      capital trusts                                 26                  26
    One-third of rental expense, net of
      subleasing income, for operating leases        23                  20
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   $217                 161
  =========================================================================
  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.2                 5.7
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *Includes amortization of capitalized interest totaling approximately
   $9 million and $8 million in 1999 and 1998, respectively.


  Earnings available for fixed charges include, if any, the company's
  equity in losses of companies owned less than fifty percent and having
  debt for which the company is contingently liable.  Fixed charges include
  the company's proportionate share, if any, of interest relating to the
  contingent debt.

  In 1990 and 1988, respectively, the company guaranteed a $400 million
  bank loan and $250 million of notes payable for the Long-Term Stock
  Savings Plan (LTSSP), an employee benefit plan.  In 1994, the notes
  payable were refinanced with a $131 million term loan, which was repaid
  in June 1998.  The $400 million loan was amended in 1994, 1995, and again
  in 1997.  Consolidated interest expense included a minimal amount of
  interest related to LTSSP borrowings for the first six months of 1999 and
  1998.


<PAGE>