alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

August 14, 2001 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ERNEST EDWARD WILSON

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County

NO. 98-D-2474

NO. M2000-01997-CCA-R3-CD - FILED OCTOBER 17, 2001

James Curwood Witt, Jr., J., concurring and dissenting.

Although I agree with Judge Welles that it is problematic to use voluntary

manslaughter as the intermediate offense for the purposes of applying the Williams harmless error

rule, I concur with Judge Riley in affirming the conviction, based on the facts of the present case and

the defendant’s use of those facts in formulating a theory of defense. Given the facts, the defendant’s

theory of defense, and the jury’s verdict of second-degree murder, I conclude that the failure to

charge the included offenses lesser than voluntary manslaughter was harmless error.

___________________________________

James Curwood Witt, Jr., Judge
NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 700

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

HARLINGEN MEDICAL CE NTER, LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP

, Appellant,

v.

ROSA ANDRADE, AS NEX T FRIEND OF

M. H. A., A MINOR CH ILD, ET AL.

, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 404 th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant ’s unopposed motion to

abate the appeal . Appellant believes it is prudent that this appeal be abated pending

resolution of a second motion to dismiss pending in the trial court.2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on fil e and the

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal should

be granted. The motion to abate the appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered

ABATED until April 20, 2015 or upon further order of this Court.

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before April 20, 2015 , either (1) a motion

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

17th da y of February, 2015

.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

GSC Construction, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W91236-10-D-0064 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 58658, 59724 

James S. DelSordo, Esq. 

Argus Legal, PLLC 

Manassas, VA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Jonathan R. Bryant, Esq. 

Carlton A. Arnold, Esq. 

Nicole E. Angst, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of the appeals having been settled, the appeals are 

hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement 

is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within six 

months of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 28 February 2017 

MICHAEL T. PAUL 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58658, 59724, Appeals of 

GSC Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-3676-000]

Take notice tht on September 14, 2000, PG&E Energy Trading—Power, L.P. (PGET), tendered for filing pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824d, an application seeking authorization for sale of electric energy and ancillary services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), an affiliate of PGET.

PGET states that it currently effective rate schedules do not provide for sales to PG&E. The purpose of the instant filing PGET states, is to enable PGET to make sales of energy and ancillary services to PG&E. In order to respond to a request for offers issued by PG&E on September 11, 2000, PGET asks for Commission action on its filing by no later than October 10, 2000, and proposes an effective date as the date of filing, but no later than October 10, 2000.

PGET states that it has served a copy of its filing on the California Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before October 2, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-24356  Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                       (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(A) AND (B))


I,  Timothy  Rosen,  Chairman  of  the  Board  and  Chief  Executive  Officer of
VerticalBuyer,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  certify  that:

(1)  the  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements
of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or  78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


July  12,  2004

                                                     /s/ Timothy  Rosen
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Timothy  Rosen
                                                     Chairman  of  the  Board
                                                     and Chief Executive Officer

I,  Leslie  Kent, Chief Financial Officer of VerticalBuyer, Inc. (the "Company")
certify  that:

(1)  the  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements
of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or  78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  July  12,  2004

                                                     /s/ Leslie  Kent
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Leslie  Kent
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       10
<PAGE>
Request for Additional Information - 5 Star Property Resource 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Roberti: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-2404). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which 

is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request 

any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not 

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us (202) 267-9677.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jake Troutman

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:05 PM 

To: steveroberti@outlook.com 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

Request for Additional Information - 5 Star Property Resource Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 8/26/2015
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549 

FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)February 8, 2023PVH CORP. /DE/(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware001-0757213-1166910    (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)285 Madison Avenue,New York,New York10017(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500Not Applicable(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act      (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act      (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock, $1 par valuePVHNew York Stock ExchangeIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).Emerging growth company  ☐If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. oItem 8.01. Other Events. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) declared on February 8, 2023 a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0375 per share on the Company’s common stock. The dividend ispayable on March 29, 2023 to stockholders of record on March 8, 2023. A press release announcing the dividend is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.Item 9.01. Financial Statements And Exhibits.(d)  Exhibits.Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit99.1Press Release dated February 8, 2023.104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.PVH CORP. By: /s/ Mark D. Fischer      Mark D. FischerExecutive Vice President, General Counsel andSecretary Date: February 8, 2023
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: May 10, 2007 |   | /s/ Douglas G.  Bryant         |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                |   | **Douglas  G. Bryant**         |
|                |   | ***Chief  Financial Officer*** |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-5870

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AGNES PATRICIA DIXON, a/k/a Pat Dixon,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-95-463)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Langdon D. Long, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellant. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United

States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Agnes Patricia Dixon pled guilty to two counts of a nineteencount indictment charging Dixon with conspiracy and substantive

violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1014 (West 1976 and Supp. 1996) and 18

U.S.C.A. § 215(a)(1), (2) (West 1969). The district court sentenced

Dixon to serve fourteen months imprisonment followed by five years

of supervised release and to pay a special assessment fee of $100.

She appeals her convictions and sentence. Dixon's attorney has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), raising one issue but indicating that, in his view, there

are no meritorious issues for appeal. Dixon was informed of her

right to file a pro se supplemental brief, which she has failed to

file.

Dixon's counsel raises the question of whether the district

court complied with requirements outlined in Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure when taking Dixon's plea. Following a

de novo review of the entire record, we conclude that the district

court complied with all the mandates of Rule 11 in accepting

Dixon's guilty plea. We therefore affirm Dixon's conviction and

sentence.

In accordance with the requirements of Anders, we have examined the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious

issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his

client, in writing, of her right to petition the Supreme Court of

the United States for further review. If the client requests that

a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition
3

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave

to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that

a copy thereof was served on the client.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with this Annual Report of Regenesis Centers, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anne Invernale
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
      to
      the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






*/s/
      Anne Invernale*


Anne
      Invernale


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer




March
      29,
      2007
|    |                                                                              |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ITC Holdings Corp.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                       |
|  /s/ Cameron M. Bready                                           |
| Cameron M. BreadyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date:  November 10, 2009 /s/ Dominick Pope
 Chief Financial Officer
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-13-000013906-JUN-201309:29 AM
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Bandier Realty Partners, LLC and Switchback Ventures, LLC v

. SSC Opportunity Partners, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00782

- CV

Trial cou rt case number: 2011

- 43194

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: October 12, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellee SSC Opportunity Partners

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack, Justice Higley, and Justice Massengale

Date: November 24 , 2015
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Service
Air Group, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, I, Mohammad Sultan,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Service Air Group, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
     2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
     period ended September 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service Air
     Group, Inc.


By:    /s/   Mohammad Sultan
       ----------------------------
       Mohammad Sultan
       Chief Executive Officer
       Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 15, 2006
Exhibit 4.336

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 165418 dated May 23, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 23, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated June 09, 2018 No. 392-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 12, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 425 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-229705) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 12, 2019