alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
  
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines,
IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Ellen Z. Lamale
Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary March 13, 2006




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

###### [Notice 00-115] 

# AGENCY:

                        National Aeronautics and Space Administration.                               ( print page 57402)    

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Astrobiology Task Force. 

# DATES:

Monday, October 30, 2000, 8:15 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 8:15 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Ames Research Center, Building 3 Conference Center, Moffett Field, CA. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Anne Kinney, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-2150. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 
    - Astrobiology at NASA Status
    - NAI Status and Science
    - Astrobiology at Ames
    - NARL and the Ames Research Park
    - Technology NRA and ASTEP
    - Technology Plan for Mars and Beyond
    - The New Mars Architecture
    - Senior Review Process and Astrobiology
    - New Initiatives in AB.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-24401 Filed 9-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Bell, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3104.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2020-OHIO-3104

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BELL, APPELLEE.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Bell, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3104.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Harper. 

(No. 2018-1537―Submitted May 13, 2020―Decided May 29, 2020.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 17AP-645, 

2018-Ohio-3576. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} On the authority of State v. Harper, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2020-Ohio2913, __ N.E.3d __, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent 

that it remanded the case to the trial court to correct the entry imposing postrelease 

control. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, 

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

_________________ 

Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth Gilbert, 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant, state of Ohio. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

_________________
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth C. Wiedrich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.


|                    |                                                                    
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 20, 2010 | /s/ Kenneth C. Wiedrich Kenneth C. Wiedrich Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unico, Incorporated and will be retained by Unico, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



June 29, 2007









<TABLE>
<S>                                 <C>
China Techfaith Wireless            DIRECT LINE: 2842 9522
 Communication Technology Limited   E-MAIL: Benjamin.Dyer@conyersdillandpearman.com
Tower D2, IT Park, Electronic Town  OUR REF: BNRD/jm/240978 (M#871692)
No.10 A, Jiu Xian Qiao North Road   YOUR REF:
Chao Yang District
Beijing, China 100015
People's Republic of China
</TABLE>



Dear Sirs,

CHINA TECHFAITH WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (THE "COMPANY")
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F

We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Company's
annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, and to the reference therein to our firm
under the heading "Cayman Islands Taxation" in the annual report. In giving such
consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules
and Regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman

CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00403-CR

Alan Lee Beusse, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 82002, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E

A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he 

provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine 

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for 

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with 

this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial 

court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide 
2

written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was 

provided, on or before February 28, 2023. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on February 16, 2023.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Do Not Publish
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 of XO Communications, Inc. (the Company), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Wayne M. Rehberger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and     
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Date: August 14, 2002 | /s/ Wayne M. Rehberger
Wayne M. Rehberger
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Devine Entertainment Corporation,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2007                                      /s/ David Devine
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Name:  David Devine
                                                       Title: President and CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I,
Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 1.
 The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
 The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Liankuan
 YangName: Liankuan YangTitle: Chief
 Executive Officer, principal executive officerDated:
 February 11, 2010 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00590

- CR

Derwin Ray ROBINSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Tria l Court No. 2019CR1021 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s brief was originally due by January 17, 2020 and was not filed. We notified appellant ’ s counsel of the deficiency on February 3, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2). In that notice, we cautioned appellant that if we did not receive an adequate response by February 13, 2020, we would abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See id.

Neither t he brief nor a motion for extension of time to file t he brief has been filed.

Pursuant to R ule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we ORDER this appeal ABATED and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his a ppeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel.

(3) Has appointed or retained coun sel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing.The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first tw o questions by sworn

affidavit from appellant. The trial court shall, however, order appellant ’ s counsel to be present at the hearing.

We further ORDER the district clerk and court reporter to file a supplemental clerk ’ s and

reporter ’ s records in this co urt by Mar ch 25, 2020

, which shall include: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHE REOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2192 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2011 

Received 

AN ACT 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7, qualifying members of reserve components of the 

Armed Forces and members of the National Guard who, 

after September 11, 2001, are called to active duty or 

to perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 

90 days. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2192 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

5 Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF 

7 AMENDMENT. 

8 Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists 

9 Debt Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–438; 122 Stat. 

10 5000) is amended by striking ‘‘3-year’’ and inserting ‘‘7- 

11 year’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EFRAIN GOMEZ VALENZUELA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72214

Agency No. A044-568-768

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Efrain Gomez Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico and lawful

permanent resident, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

order dismissing, upon reconsideration, his appeal from an immigration judge’s

FILED

OCT 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-72214

denial of cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Gomez

Valenzuela’s application for cancellation of removal did not warrant a favorable

exercise of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (barring review of denials

of discretionary relief). Gomez Valenzuela’s contention that he was denied

meaningful review is not supported by the record and therefore is not a colorable

claim invoking our jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Martinez-Rosas v.

Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]raditional abuse of discretion

challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable

constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 (TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LOGO) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Thomas M. Brandt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (the Registrant), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Date: December 8, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2155 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2155

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P16.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2011

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P16.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map included in the set of maps entitled 
``Coastal Barrier Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit 
P16 in Florida is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same 
unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
Corrected Unit P16'' and dated ____.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Aspire Japan, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), I, Kenji Osako, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May 13, 2011

/s/ Kenji OsakoKenji OsakoPresident, Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aspire Japan, Inc. and will be retained by Aspire Japan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Brett White, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Corio, Inc. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Corio, Inc. and will be retained by Corio, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







|Date: August 13, 2004 | /s/    Brett
White
|--------------------- | ------------------
|                      |                   

---