alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1894 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to clarify the right of an accused 

to plead guilty in a trial by a military commission for a capital offense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2011 

Mr. GOWDY (for himself, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. WEST, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, and Mrs. ADAMS) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to clarify the right 

of an accused to plead guilty in a trial by a military 

commission for a capital offense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Commissions 

5 Guilty Plea Adjustment Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1894 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF RIGHT TO PLEAD GUILTY IN A 

2 TRIAL FOR A CAPITAL OFFENSE BY A MILI3 TARY COMMISSION. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION OF RIGHT.—Section 949m(b)(2) 

5 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C), by inserting before the 

7 semicolon the following: ‘‘, or a guilty plea was ac8 cepted and not withdrawn prior to announcement of 

9 the sentence in accordance with section 949i(b) of 

10 this title’’; and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘on the 

12 sentence’’ after ‘‘vote was taken’’. 

13 (b) PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS.—Section 949i of such 

14 title is amended by adding at the end the following new 

15 subsection: 

16 ‘‘(c) PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS.—(1) A plea of guilty 

17 made by the accused that is accepted by a military judge 

18 under subsection (b) and not withdrawn prior to an19 nouncement of the sentence may form the basis for an 

20 agreement reducing the maximum sentence approved by 

21 the convening authority, including the reduction of a sen22 tence of death to a lesser punishment, or that the case 

23 will be referred to a military commission under this chap24 ter without seeking the penalty of death. Such an agree25 ment may provide for terms and conditions in addition to 

26 a guilty plea by the accused in order to be effective. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1894 IH

1 ‘‘(2) A plea agreement under this subsection may not 

2 provide for a sentence of death imposed by a military 

3 judge alone. A sentence of death may only be imposed by 

4 the unanimous vote of a military commission concurring 

5 in the sentence of death as provided in section 

6 949m(b)(2)(D) of this title.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ENRIQUE SOTOLONGO and MIRIAM SOTOLONGO

, Appellant s

,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2582

[ December 17, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Nicholas R. Lopane , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 18

- 007530

.

Michael Espinal of Watson, Espinal & Barnard, PLLC, Miami for

appellants.

Kathryn L. Ender of Lewis Brisbois Bisg aard & Smith, LLP, Miami, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of Caibs International Holding, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2005, I, Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Caibs International Holding, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caibs International Holding, Inc. |

 
| Date: May 15, 2006                                                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |
| **CAIBS INTERNATIONAL HOLDING, INC.******                                     |
|                                                                          |
| By: /s/ Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa                                           |
| Lord Dr. Masaaki Ikawa

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darin Jenkins, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered July 29, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Santagata, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant challenges the hearing court’s denial of his motion to suppress his oral and written confessions. A review of the record reveals that the defendant’s contention that his confession was obtained through psychological coercion is without merit. We find that the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s confession was made voluntarily *(see, People v Anderson,*42 NY2d 35; *see, also, People v Woods,*141 AD2d 588, 589).

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove that it was his physical abuse of the two-year-old victim that caused the child’s death. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. The People proved that the defendant, while under the influence of crack-cocaine, caused the child’s death by physically beating him. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual *422review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in permitting the arresting officer, who was a key prosecution witness, to sit at the prosecutor’s table and to assist the prosecutor at trial. However, we find that the alleged error is not preserved for our review and, in any event, is harmless since the proof of the defendant’s guilt is overwhelming and there exists no significant probability that, had it not been for the alleged error, the jury would have acquitted the defendant *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and review of those contentions in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction is not warranted under the facts of this case. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-703 and 731-TA-1661-1663 (Preliminary)]

# AGENCY:

International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

Correction is made to the publication number.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 16, 2024 (89 FR 12380) in FR Doc. 2024-03227, on page 12381, in the fourth column, the publication number should be USITC Publication 5493 (February 2024).                

Issued: February 26, 2024.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-04310 Filed 2-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**CERTIFICATE
      OF OFFICER**


**OF**


**** **LNR
      PARTNERS, INC**




**Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the
      "Agreement"),**


**by
      and among GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as
      Depositor,**


**GEMSA
      Loan Services, L.P., as Servicer, LaSalle Bank, N.A., as
      Trustee,**


**ABN
      AMRO Bank N.V., as Fiscal Agent,**


**and
      LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer**


**(GECCMC
      2005-C1)**








The
      undersigned, Susan K. Chapman, as Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc., a
      Florida Corporation (the "Company"), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the
      Agreement, hereby certifies
      on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of the activities of the Company during
      the year ended December 31, 2005 and of its performance under the Agreement has
      been
      made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
      review, the Company has maintained an effective internal control system relating
      to its servicing
      of the Mortgage Loans and Serviced Whole Loans and it has fulfilled all of
      its
      obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period
      ended December 31, 2005 (iii) the Company has not received notice regarding
      qualification, or challenging
      the status, of the Lower-Tier REMIC or Upper-Tier REMIC as a REMIC or the
      Grantor Trust as a "grantor trust" from the Internal Revenue Service or any
      other governmental
      agency or body.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate
      as
      of the 1st day of March, 2006.











/s/
      Susan K. Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President


LNR
      Partners, Inc.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20675

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PAUL ROOSEVELT BANKS, also known

as Paul Robert Banks,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

95-CR-219-1

_________________________________________________________________

May 6, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul R. Banks, Jr. was convicted of conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting the possession

with intent to distribute cocaine. A pro se notice of appeal was

filed with this court, indicating that Banks intended to appeal the

judgment. The notice of appeal, however, was signed by Deandraline

Banks, who indicated that she had the permission of Paul R. Banks,

Jr. to sign the document. 
2

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c) states that “[a]

notice of appeal filed pro se is filed on behalf of the party

signing the notice and the signer’s spouse and minor children, if

they are parties, unless the notice of appeal clearly indicates a

contrary intent.” Fed. R. App. P. 3(c) (emphasis added). Paul R.

Banks, Jr. clearly failed to comply with this rule. Moreover,

there is no indication in the record that Banks was unable to sign

the notice of appeal for himself, nor is there any indication of

the reason underlying his failure to sign the notice of appeal on

his own behalf. The presentence report reflects that Paul R.

Banks, Jr. was never married, and we know nothing of the

relationship between Paul R. Banks, Jr. and Deandraline Banks--

other than Banks’s assertion that she is a relative. Under these

circumstances, we hold that Banks’s failure to comply with the

requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c) is fatal

to his appeal and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

See Mikeska v. Collins, 928 F.2d 126, 126 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding

that notice of appeal failed to perfect appeal on behalf of pro se

defendants who were named in the notice but who failed to sign

notice).

In reaching this holding, we are aware that this court

liberally construes papers filed by pro se litigants; however,

where, as here, there is no suggested explanation for the failure
3

to comply with the rule, we find no basis to allow the appeal to

proceed. There may be circumstances, not present in this appeal,

that would justify the failure of a pro se appellant to sign his

notice of appeal; however, we need not reach that issue today.

Because we conclude that the notice of appeal filed with this

court is defective, we are without jurisdiction over this appeal

and, accordingly, the action is 

D I S M I S S E D.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

(3) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bel Fuse Inc. and will be retained by Bel Fuse Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 21, 2003

                                         By: /s/ Colin Dunn
                                             -----------------------------------
                                               Colin Dunn, Vice President of
                                               Finance


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Adam WassermanName: Adam WassermanTitle: Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officerDated: February 22, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`Promissory Note
$ 75,000.00 USD               Temple, Texas                    Date Mar.21, 2001


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 

              THE SUM OF SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00)


In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.0% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.


THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) principal due in one year (on or
before March 21, 2002). Interest of 4,500.00 per year payable in monthly amounts
of $375.00 on the 21st of each month

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
constitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.

                            David Hancock, President`
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 17, 2006
#### John PARISH v. STATE of Texas (two cases).

Nos. 26963, 26964.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of misdemeanor swindling; the penalty assessed is a fine of $100.

This is a companion case to Parish v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 268 S.W.2d 149. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause remanded.
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of theregistrant are as follows:

 
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **State or Other  Jurisdiction of  Incorporation or  Organization** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                   |       |                                                                |       |
| Boise Cascade, L.L.C.                                  |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Boise  Cascade Finance Corporation                     |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Boise  Building Solutions Manufacturing, L.L.C.        |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Louisiana  Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C.          |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Boise  Building Solutions Manufacturing Holdings Corp. |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Boise  Cascade Corporation Chile S.A.                  |       | Chile                                                               |       |
| BC  Chile Investment Corporation                       |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Compania  Industrial Puerto Montt S.A.                 |       | Chile                                                               |       |
| BC  Brazil Investment Corporation                      |       | Delaware                                                            |       |
| Boise  Alljoist Ltd.                                   |       | Canada                                                              |       |
| Boise  Engineered Wood Products Limited                |       | United Kingdom                                                      |       |
| Boise  Building Solutions Distribution, L.L.C.         |       | Delaware                                                            |       |

 

----
#### Otis STACY, Appellant, v. John W. BAIRD, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 29, 1955.

Faulkner & Faulkner, Hazard, for appellant.

Alva A. Hollon, Hazard, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Otis Stacy has moved for an appeal from a judgment against him, in favor of John W. Baird, in the amount of $1,925, for damages arising out of an automobile accident.

The physical facts did not make Baird’s testimony unbelievable, and his testimony was sufficient to create a jury issue on the question of negligence. The verdict was-not flagrantly against the evidence.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.