alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

1:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 29, 2024.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

      ( print page 14121)    
Dated: February 22, 2024. 

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-04030 Filed 2-22-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### WILLS v. STATE.

No. 26915.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for transporting whisky and wine in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300.

This court has no jurisdiction here, for the reason that no notice of appeal was given and entered of record, as required by art. 827; C.C.P.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Huayang International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Wang Yufei
Wang Yufei
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 1, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1801

Lower Tribunal No. 14-32662

________________

Carlos Malvicino, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Valeria Schvartzman, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M.

Rodriguez, Judge.

Lawrence J. Shapiro & Associates, P.A., and Lawrence J. Shapiro, for

appellants.

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Abbey L. Kaplan

and Jamie L. Zuckerman, for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion given the record, we

affirm. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070(J); Premier Capital LLC v. Davalle, 994 So. 2d

360 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

2
#### Julian PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28990.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1957.

*950No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of marihuana; the punishment, 15 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
June 3, 2015 

Mr. Cole Moon 

California Surveying & Drafting Supply 

4733 Auburn Blvd. 

Sacramento, CA 95841 

Dear Mr. Moon: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 8, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1377), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6948

SAMMY JUNIOR MORGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

F. JENKINS; KENNETH LASSITER; RICK ANDERSON; LARRY B. TEELE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:09-ct-03197-BO)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sammy Junior Morgan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sammy Junior Morgan appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Morgan v. 

Jenkins, No. 5:09-ct-03197-BO (E.D.N.C. June 23, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### SAT Report PMN Number: S-09-0001 SAT Date: 11/21/2008 Print Date: 9/30/2013
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal, inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: SAT had no comment Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, IRR-E,S,MM, AQUATOX Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: S-09-0001 FATE: Estimations for typical log Kow = 2.59 (E); VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)BP > 400 EC (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 1.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.29 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0-25 via possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg $ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for on the lung; irritation to eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on properties of the compound. As a nonionic the PMN substance may anesthetize the eye allowing considerable damage before anything is noticed.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 40 29 daphnid 48-h LC50 40 green algal 96-h EC50 40 fish

_ chronic value 8 6 measured = measured acute / 5 daphnid

_ chronic value 8 algal

_ chronic value 10 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic SAR chemical class = log Kow of the hydrophobe by ClogP is equivalent to p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 600SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### BEADLES v. STATE.

No. 26984.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 5, 1954.

*202No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Aggravated assault with a motor vehicle is the offense, with punishment assessed at sixty days in jail and a fine of $25.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
| Ex - 21.1                                         |   |               |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
| Subsidiaries of the Registrant                    |   |               |
|                                              |   | Jurisdiction of    |
| Name                                              |   | Incorporation      |
|                                              |   |               |
| Bel Components Ltd.                               |   | Hong Kong          |
| Bel Connector Inc.                                |   | Delaware           |
| Bel Fuse Delaware Inc.                            |   | Delaware           |
| Bel Fuse Europe Ltd.                              |   | United Kingdom     |
| Bel Fuse Limited                                  |   | Hong Kong          |
| Bel Fuse (Macao Commerical Offshore) Limited      |   | Macao              |
| Bel Pingguo Limited                               |   | PRC                |
| Bel Power (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd.                     |   | PRC                |
| Bel Power Inc.                                    |   | Massachusetts      |
| Bel Sales (Hong Kong) Ltd.                        |   | Hong Kong          |
| Bel Stewart GmbH                                  |   | Germany            |
| Bel Stewart s.r.o.                                |   | Czech Republic     |
| Bel Transformer Inc.                              |   | Delaware           |
| Bel Ventures Inc.                                 |   | Delaware           |
| Cinch Connectors, Inc.                            |   | Delaware           |
| Cinch Connectors Limited                          |   | England and Wales  |
| Cinch Connectors de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.          |   | Mexico             |
| Signal Dominicana, S.R.L.                         |   | Dominican Republic |
| Stewart Connector Systems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico             |
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertJ. Zatta, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  February 29, 2008                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |
| /s/ ROBERT  J. ZATTA                          |   |
| Robert  J. Zatta                                   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

     Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Deborah F. McLeod, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
                                   ---------------------
                                   Deborah F. McLeod, Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal financial and accounting officer)



November 14, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6193

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAMON ANGEL GARCIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lyle E. Strom, Senior

District Judge. (3:01-cr-00036-2; 3:05-cv-00025)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramon Angel Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ramon Angel Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garcia has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Darrel RICHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27614.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1955.

No attorney on' appeal, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty.j Austin, for the State;

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for contributing to the delinquency of a minor; the punishment, a fine of $250 and six" months in the county jail.

It has been shown by the proper authority that the appellant has djed since the filing of his appeal in this court. Accompanying the record is a certified copy of the death certificate issued by the Bureau of Vital Statistics of the State Department of Health verifying such fact.

The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal. It' is therefore abated.

Opinion approved by the court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 15566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-1032-001.
    Applicants: Osaka Gas Trading & Export LLC.
    Description: Osaka Gas Trading & Export LLC submits Annual Report 
of Purchased Capacity pursuant to the October 20, 2023 Order.
    Filed Date: 2/26/24.
    Accession Number: 20240226-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/11/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-412-001.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Electric Power Cost 
Recovery Surcharge Adjustment to be effective 4/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 2/23/24.
    Accession Number: 20240223-5205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/24.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at:http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#58170808183e3d2a3b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="501f000010363522337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 26, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-04417 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

     Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Philip Hester, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Deborah F. McLeod, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



May 13, 2005                        /s/J. Philip Hester, Sr.
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    J. Philip Hester, Sr., President and CEO
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)



May 13, 2005                        /s/Deborah F. McLeod
                                    -----------------------
                                    Deborah F. McLeod, CFO
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 4038.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 12, 1937.

Manly, Hendren & Womble, of Winston-Salem, N. C., for petitioner.

John J. Burns, Gen. Counsel, Thos. J. Lynch, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Francis S. Walker, Securities & Exchange Commission, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition and amended petition dismissed in accordance with agreement of counsel. Order filed.