alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2068 

To permit a Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to continue 

to serve on the Commission if a successor is not timely appointed and 

confirmed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2011 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois (for himself, Mr. ROSS of Arkansas, Mrs. MYRICK, 

Mr. BILBRAY, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. TERRY, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, 

Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. LATTA, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. HARPER, 

Mr. RUSH, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To permit a Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to continue to serve on the Commission if a 

successor is not timely appointed and confirmed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Regulatory 

5 Commission Continuation Act’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2068 IH

1 SEC. 2. NRC COMMISSIONER TERMS. 

2 Section 201(c) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 

3 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5841(c)) is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following: ‘‘Notwithstanding the first sentence of 

5 this subsection, any member appointed and confirmed be6 fore, on, or after the date of enactment of this sentence 

7 who has not been removed by the President under sub8 section (e) may continue to serve on the Commission until 

9 the earlier of— 

10 ‘‘(1) the date on which the member’s successor 

11 has been appointed and confirmed; or 

12 ‘‘(2) the beginning of the first new Congress 

13 after the date on which the member’s term expires.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00661-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

v.

ALFRED SCHUETZE

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2016-DCL-00585

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment 

denying Schuetze's petition for expunction regarding his arrest on November 21, 2014. 

Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 10, 2019
#### ROBBINS *v.*STATE.

No. 26850.

, Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, *1954.*

*109Ray T. Stevens, Austin, for appellant.

Bob Long, Dist. Atty., Wallace W. Shropshire, Asst. Dist. Atty., Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to-wit, morphine, ‘and his, punishment was assessed, at five years in the penitentiary.

In view of the disposition we make of this case it is not necessary to here state the facts.

Appellant entered a plea of not guilty, did not testify, and did not file an application for a suspended sentence.

The state, iii making out its case in chief, introduced the following testimony by the alleged purchaser of narcotics from appellant: The witness testified that appellant told him that he had had twenty convictions before he was sixteen years of age; had participated in the róbbéry of a store; had been to the penitentiary on a kidnapping charge, and “had done time in Huntsville.” Appellant timely objected to this testimony, upon the ground that the state was attacking his character and reputation which had' not been placed in issue. He requested that the testimony be stricken from the record, and the jury be instructed to disregard same for all purposes, and also moved for a mistrial, which motions were overruled.

Another witness, for the state, gave substantially the same testimony over appellant’s objection.

The state cannot attack the accused’s character or reputation until it has been put in issue. Appellant, at no time, having placed his character or reputation in issue, evidence as to his prior convictions was inadmissible. Fannin v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 41, 100 S.W. 916, 10 L.R.A.,N.S., 744; Kelley v. State, 79 Tex.Cr.R. 362, 185 S.W. 570; Patrick v. State, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 434, 278 S.W. 432; Johnson v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 245, 193 S.W.2d 528; Freeze v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 595, 113 S.W.2d 539; Harris v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 308, 194 S.W.2d 101.

For the error herein pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         127,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,626,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,856
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,196,298
<PP&E>                                         835,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 696,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,273,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,289,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,235,674 
<COMMON>                                        72,119
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,273,564
<SALES>                                      7,344,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,344,380
<CGS>                                        7,359,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,480,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (38,463)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             435,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,533,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (775,023)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,758,345)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,758,345)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.71)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joe Richard OLIVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27145.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

*113No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Ewing Werlein, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Molecular Evolution, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.

Lawrence E. Bloch, M.D., J.D.
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2003
|     1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp., Inc. |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August 23, 2010                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Donny Smith                                                        |
| Donny SmithPresident, CEO, CFO, Secretary and Director  |
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In Re Estate of Elywn O. Doggett,

Deceased

No. 06

- 19

- 00034

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

P10698 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, John Doggett, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1565 

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

David F. Barton, The Gardner Law Firm, of San Antonio, Texas, argued for plaintiffappellant. 

Conor B. Dugan, Attorney, Appellate Section, Civil Rights Division, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on 

the brief were Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General, Mark L. Gross and Lisa Wilson 

Edwards, Attorneys. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas 

Judge Xavier Rodriguez 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-1565 

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas 

 

in CASE NO(S). 98-CV-1011 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED May 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BidGive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas W. Richardson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Thomas W. Richardson

Thomas W. Richardson

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 16, 2004
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,                2007,                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                           |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                period ended September 30, 2007, fairly represents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Service                Air                Group, Inc. |

| By:    | */**s/*   *Mohammad                Sultan*Mohammad                SultanChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
03/08/2006
 
 **Via
          UPS**
 (312)
          904-7323
 Ms.
          Barbara L. Marik
 First
          Vice President
 LaSalle
          Bank National Association
 135
          South
          LaSalle Street, Suite 1625
 Chicago,
          IL
 USA 60603-0000
  Morgan
          Stanley Capital I, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
 Series
          2005-IQ9
 Pooling
          and Servicing Agreement
  **OFFICER'S
          CERTIFICATE**
  Pursuant
          to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing
          the referenced Trust (the "PSA"), it is hereby certified that (i) the
          undersigned has completed a review of the servicer's performance of its
          obligations under the PSA for the preceding calendar year; (ii) to the
          best of
          the undersigned's knowledge on the basis of that review the servicer has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA throughout such period in
          all
          material respects; (iii) to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the
          subservicer, of the servicer under the PSA, if any, has fulfilled its
          obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects;
          and,
          (iv) no notice has been received from any governmental agency or body which
          would indicate a challenge or question as to the status of the Trust's
          qualification as a REMIC under the U.S. Code.
 
 /s/
          Steven W.
          Smith3/8/06
 Steven
          W.
          Smith        Date
 Executive
          Vice
          President
  **A
          member of
          the PNC Financial Services Group**
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 9, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00473

- CV

Quality Operating Company (f/k/a Quality Operating Company LLC)

d/b/a Bob’s Containers , Appellant

v.

Michael Mueller , Appellee

APPEAL FROM C OUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court . Having reviewed the record , the

Court holds that Quality Operating Company (f/k/a Quality Operating Company LLC) d/b/a

Bob’s Container s has not prosecu ted its appeal and did not comply with a notice from the C lerk

of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE WEBB,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-93-7-3, CA-97-1051-3)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Elizabeth Shackelford, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Webb, Nos. CR-93-7-3; CA-97-1051-3 (D.S.C.

June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
^\^C o^ AW'^f n 

DEPARTMEirr OF TRANSPORTATION 

AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

5EANPARNELL, GOVERNOR 

3132 CHANNEL DRIVE 

POBox 112500 

JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-2500 

FAX: 

PHONE: 

(907) 586-8365 

(907) 465-3900 

April 16,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood ; ^j 

Secretary Hq 

U.S. Department of Transportation ;:- Q 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service at Adak, Alaska Docket OST-2000-8556 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express our strong support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service 

agreement at Adak and the critical connection it brings to one of the most remote communities in 

our nation. 

The State of Alaska understands the importance placed on community comments and supports the 

USDOT in the statements made concerning Adak in previous awards, specifically Order 2003-1-8: 

... "Department has traditionally given even greater weight to desires of Alaska communities, 

given the state's greater dependence on air service. Clearly, no community currently relying 

on subsidized air sen'ice is as isolated and dependent on air sennce as Adak. " 

and reiterated in Order 2008-3-36: 

"As ne have previously stated, while required by statute to give great weight to community 

preferences, the Department has traditionally given even more significant weight to the 

desires of Alaska communities vs. non-Alaska communities since they are dependent on air 

service. " 

We agree wholeheartedly that the community is the best judge of the level and type of service 

required to meet the essential needs of the people and respectfully request the USDOT support 

the documented community needs in the City of Adak. ^ . 

Sincere 

cc: Dennis DeVany, Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis, U.S. DOT 

Bill MacKay, Sr. Vice President Alaska, Alaska Airlines 

Danny Seybert, President, PenAir
Exhibit 23









                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 21, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Phillips Petroleum Company included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1996, in the following registration statements and related
prospectuses.

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 33-51559

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 33-54987

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 333-01209

  Thrift Plan of Phillips
    Petroleum Company              Form S-8    File No. 33-50134

  Long-Term Stock Savings Plan of
    Phillips Petroleum Company     Form S-8    File No. 33-50283

  Retirement Savings Plan of
    Phillips Petroleum Company     Form S-8    File No. 33-28669




                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 21, 1997

<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Voll, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aquantia Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark Voll          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Mark Voll              
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer