alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2431

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Maurice L. Jarrett, also known *

as Maurice L. Butler, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 23, 1996

 Filed: March 1, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Maurice L. Jarrett appeals the

sentence imposed by the district court following Jarrett's guilty plea to 1

drug offenses. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

The sole argument raised in the Anders brief is that the district

court erred in denying Jarrett's motion for a downward departure pursuant

to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, which Jarrett based on the United States Sentencing

Commission's February 1995 report concluding that the 100-to-1 ratio

between the penalties for crack cocaine and powder cocaine was not

justified, and a proposed Guidelines amendment--which would have eliminated

the 100-to-1 ratio--forwarded by the Commission to Congress for its
-2-

consideration. Jarrett's downward-departure argument is foreclosed by our

recent decision in United States v. Higgs, 72 F.3d 69, 70 (8th Cir. 1995)

(per curiam) (Commission's February 1995 report is not basis upon which

court can rely to grant § 5K2.0 downward departure; also noting that

Congress rejected Commission's recommended Guidelines amendment). 

After reviewing the record on appeal in accordance with Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT

Ryan Chadwick Dodson * From the 326th District Court of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 28,103

- C

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 275

- CV * September 15 , 2017

Jalynda Leigh Smith, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson

, J. (P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Ryan Chadwick Dodson.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 29 85

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ran da ll S. Krau se
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ci ty of Om ah a
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of Ne br as ka - Om ah a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 11 , 20 16 Fi le d: Feb ru ary 22 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ran da ll Krau se ap pe al s aft er the dis tr ic t co ur t di sm is se d hi s co m

pl ai nt se ek in g 1 de cl arat or y an d in

jun ct iv e rel ie f un de r th e Res ou rce Co ns erv at io n an d Rec ov ery Act

The Hon or ab le Lau rie Sm it h Cam p, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t 1 fo r th e Dis tri ct of Ne br as ka

.(RCR A), 42 U.S.C. § § 69 01 -6 99 2, rel at ed to th e Ci ty of Om ah a’s us e of so di um

ch lo rid e an d so di um ferr oc y an id e--a type o f r o a d sa lt to m el t sn ow an d ic e--o n a st reet lo cat ed wit hi n a flo od pl ai n.

Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t c o u r t di d no t err in di sm is si ng Krau se ’s co m pl ai nt on gr ou n d s t ha t th e ro ad sa lt de sc rib ed in th e
co m pl ai nt di d no t m eet th e st at ut or y de fin it io n of “ so li d was te ” un d e r R CRA. See Mi nn

. Majo rit y v. Man sk y , 70 8 F.3 d 10 51 , 10 55 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (d is m is sa l fo r fai lu re to st at e cl ai m rev ie wed de no vo ; ap pe ll at e co ur t as su m es al l fact s in co m pl ai nt to be tru e an d co ns tru es al l reas on ab le in fere nc es fro m th os e fact s fav or ab ly to

co m pl ai na nt ); cf. Eco lo g i c a l R i g h ts Fo un d. v. Pac. Gas & Elec . C o., 71 3 F.3 d 50 2, 51 4- 18 (9 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (aff irming lo wer co ur t’s di sm is sa l of co m pl ai nt cl ai m in g th at ut il it y co m

pa ny ha d vi ol at ed RCR A by tre at in g ut il it y po le s wit h woo d pr es erv at iv e, whi ch was rel eas ed ov er ti m e an d was in tu rn “ di sc a r d e d ” b y rai n wate r fal li ng on po le s; co nc lud ing tha t su ch woo d pr es erv at iv e was no t “ di sc ard ed ”, an d th eref or e was
no t “ so li d was te ” un de r RCR A, whe re it was rel eas ed i n t o th e en vi ro nm en t as an
ex pe ct ed co ns eq ue nc e o f it s i nt en de d u se ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I,David T. Gulian, the Chief Executive Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Form 10-K/A of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained inthe Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 24, 2010                    |     |
|-----------------------------------------|----------|
|                                    |     |
| /s/  DAVID T. GULIAN                    |     |
| David  T. Gulian                        |     |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* | * * |

* *

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  March 30, 2011
 
 By:
/s/ Michael ShafferName:
Michael Shaffer

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as State v. Parr, 2018-Ohio-2265.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WARREN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-01-005 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 6/11/2018 

 : 

THOMAS A. PARR, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 17CR32707 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, 520 Justice Drive, Lebanon, OH 

45036, for plaintiff-appellee 

Engel & Martin, LLC, Mary K. Martin, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, OH 45040, for 

defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript 

of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Thomas A. Parr, has filed a brief with this 

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 
Warren CA2018-01-005 

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose 

any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment 

of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the 

appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record 

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and 

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw 

as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies 

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7, B-43)

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: VIRASB VAHIDI SeniorVice President

- Marketing and Planning and Chief Commercial Officer AmericanAirlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 DFW Airport, Texas 75261

March 27, 2013 WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. SeniorVice President

- GovernmentAffairs AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comMotion of BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7, B-43) DOT-OST-1996 1203

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
AmericanAirlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby
moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 4Q2012 and B-43 for YE2012, be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld from public disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requestedpertains toAmerican's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office ofAirline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiodto similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons stated inthat letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.2 -

WHEREFORE, Americanmoves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

March 27, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil SeniorAttorney American Airlines, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing
of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Liankuan Yang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/  Liankuan YangName: Liankuan YangTitle: Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer  Dated: May 23, 2011   A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the filing by AeroGrow International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of
      its Transitional Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March
      31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,
      Mitchell B. Rubin, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)          
      The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)          
      The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
                July __, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                MITCHELL B. RUBINMitchell
                    B. RubinChief
                    Financial Officer(Principal
                  Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We
have issued our report dated April 11, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1914 contained
in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-227346) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use
of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the
caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago,
Illinois


April 11, 2019
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2148 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary and 

exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-connected disability and to their dependents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2011 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mrs. ELLMERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military 

commissary and exchange store privileges to veterans 

with a compensable service-connected disability and to 

their dependents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans 

5 Commissary and Exchange Store Benefits Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2148 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES 

2 FOR DISABLED VETERANS AND THEIR DE3 PENDENTS. 

4 (a) EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGES.—Chapter 54 of title 

5 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: dis8 abled veterans and their dependents 

9 ‘‘(a) DISABLED VETERANS.—A veteran with a com10 pensable service-connected disability shall be permitted to 

11 use commissary and exchange stores on the same basis 

12 as a member of the armed forces entitled to retired or 

13 retainer pay. 

14 ‘‘(b) DEPENDENTS.—A dependent of a veteran de15 scribed in subsection (a) shall be permitted to use com16 missary and exchange stores on the same basis as a de17 pendent of a member of the armed forces entitled to re18 tired or retainer pay. 

19 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘vet20 eran’ and ‘service-connected’ have the meanings given 

21 those terms in section 101 of title 38.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

24 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and their dependents.’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2148 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1065 of title 10, 

2 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

3 effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2339

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Luis C. Bueno-Espinoza, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 8, 2001 Filed: March 9, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Luis C. Bueno-Espinoza contends the government violated Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), by failing timely to disclose his codefendant's plea agreement, and 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) by entering into the plea agreement

with the same codefendant in exchange for his testimony. Like the district court, we reject both arguments. Bueno-Espinoza has not shown how earlier disclosure of the plea agreement would have materially affected the outcome of his case, see United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667, 674, 682 (1985), and the government does not-2-

violate § 201(c)(2) by treating codefendants with leniency in exchange for their tes timony, see UnitedState v. Albanese , 195 F.3d 389, 394 (8th Cir. 1999) (Eighth Circuit has "long history" of allowing government to compensate witnesses for their participation in criminal investigations). Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary decision not to grant Bueno-Espinoza a downward departure. See United States v. Saelee , 123 F.3d 1024, 1025 (8th Cir. 1997) (discretionary decision not to depart from Guidelines is unreviewable absent unconstitutional motive or legally erroneous determination that court lacked authority to consider mitigating factor).
We affirm the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 2 p.m. 
eastern time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Rosalind Matherne. For more information, please contact Rosalind 
Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda includes a committee 
discussion new and old issues and starting the new TAP year.

    Dated: February 21, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-04002 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 26, 2009 

p0623 

Order 

 

June 26, 2009 

137232 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137232 

 COA: 277788 

Oakland CC: 2007-212616-FH 

GARON KEILAN PLUMP, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the issue in People v 

Watkins, 482 Mich 1114 (2008).