alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10-33
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND TIMOTHY J. LORELLO
 WHEREAS Company Employee Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 3.3(a) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 (a)
    
    In any given calendar year, Executive shall not sell or
otherwise dispose of a number of shares of common stock of the Company
acquired under Incentive Stock Awards in excess of the greater of:
 (i)
    
    40,000 shares (as adjusted to reflect any stock
dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, of the Class A
common stock of the Company); or(ii)
    
    the product of (A) ten percent (10%) times
(B) the sum of (I) the number of shares of common stock of the
Company to which Executive holds title, determined as of the
date immediately before the proposed sale or disposition date,
that were issued pursuant to an Incentive Stock Award, plus
(II) seventy percent (70%) of the number of shares of common
stock of the Company for which Incentive Stock Awards are
exercisable determined as of the date immediately before the
proposed sale or disposition date.
 2.
    
    Section 3.3(b) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 (b)
    
    In any given calendar quarter, Executive shall not sell or
otherwise dispose of a number of shares of common stock of the Company
acquired under Incentive Stock Awards in excess of the greater of:




---



##### 



(i)
    
    10,000 shares (as adjusted to reflect any stock
dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, of the Class A
common stock of the Company); or(ii)
    
    the product of (A) two and one-half percent
(2.5%) times (B) the sum of (I) the number of shares of common
stock of the Company to which Executive holds title, determined
as of the date immediately before the proposed sale or
disposition date, that were issued pursuant to an Incentive
Stock Award, plus (II) seventy percent (70%) of the number of
shares of common stock of the Company for which Incentive Stock
Awards are exercisable determined as of the date immediately
before the proposed sale or disposition date.
 3.
    
    Section 5.1.2 is amended by changing 30 days to be 90 days where used therein.4.
    
    Section 5.2.2 is amended by changing 30 days to be 90 days where used therein.5.
    
    In all other respects, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WITNESS/ATTEST
    
    
    
    TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC./s/ Bruce A. White
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard A. YoungTitle:
    
    Exec. VP & COODate:
    
    05/03/2010EMPLOYEE/s/ Bruce A. White
    
    
    
    /s/ Timothy J. LorelloDate:
    
    05/03/2010
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

# **Certifications**

# ** **

I,Richard A. Smith, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of a annual report) that has materially affected, or reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s control over financial reporting.

 
|   | June    ,  2004   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | Sign:                                 | /S/    Richard  A. Smith |   |
|   |                                  | Richard A. Smith |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### CARRUTHERS v. STATE.

No. 26903.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 24, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*136BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 21, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: July

8 2014 , Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** Josh Tapp of EPA gave a brief presentation on July 8, 2014 , to the Mid America Regional Council (MARC) . The majority of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 . **ATTENDEES** EPA Region 7: Joshua Tapp Other Attendees included members of MARC and its stakeholders

– attendee list not available.
| **OTHER COMMENTS Unfavorable Contract (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Other Comments [Abstract]**                                                                     |            |
| Income recorded (and subsequent reduction of liability) in connection with unfavorable contract   | $ 24,309        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Income Recorded And Reduction Of Liability In Connection With Unfavorable Contract
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_IncomeRecordedAndReductionOfLiabilityInConnectionWithUnfavorableContract**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**pvh_OtherCommentsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2015

a1028 

# Order

Clerk November 4, 2015

150699

MINGA PERKINS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150699

COA: 317643

Wayne CC: 12

- 005905

- NO

HENRY FORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, bec ause we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```
**AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES**

WHEREAS COMMUNICATE NOW.COM INC., (hereafter COMPANY) wishes to engage the
services of LEN ARONOFF, ESQ. (hereafter ARONOFF), to represent COMPANY in all
legal matters in the United States of America, and coordinated the COMPANY'S
legal efforts throughout the world from June 1 through December 31, 2002 and,

WHEREAS ARONOFF wishes to make himself available to COMPANY to perform the above
stated tasks of representing COMPANY in all legal matters throughout the United
States and coordinating COMPANY'S legal efforts and services throughout the
world from June 1, 2002 until December 31, 2002,

NOW THEREFORE, in return for ten ($10.00) dollars and other and valuable
consideration, paid each to the other in hand and acknowledged by each,

THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

        A.    ARONOFF will represent the COMPANY in all legal matters throughout
              the United States and will coordinate COMPANY'S ongoing legal
              needs and services throughout the world, from June 1, 2002 until
              December 31, 2002,

        B.    The COMPANY, for its part, will pay ARONOFF for his services, the
              amount of two hundred-thousand (200,000) common shares to be
              registered by the COMPANY in the initial S-8 registration and
              filing. Said shares are due and owing at the time of the COMPANY'S
              first disbursement of shares to consultants and outside legal
              experts.

        C.    This Agreement contains the entire terms of Agreement between the
              parties and may only be modified by writing signed and agreed to
              by all parties.

        D.    The partied understand and agree that any litigation arising form
              the contents of this Agreement shall be decided by the law of the
              State of Florida and venue shall lie in the Circuit Court of
              Orange County, Florida.

         COMMUNICATE NOW.COM, INC.

         BY: /s/ Charles Bitters
                ----------------------

             /s/ Len Aronoff
                ----------------------
```
Exhibit
14.1


NTK
HOLDINGS, INC.





CODE
OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT





NTK Holdings, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) has adopted
this Code of Ethics (the “Code”) for Senior
Financial Management (defined below) to promote honest and ethical conduct and
to deter wrongdoing.  This Code applies to the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President and Controller, Vice President and Treasurer and any other employees
performing similar functions who have been identified by the President and Chief
Executive Officer (collectively, the “Senior Financial
Management”).  The Company expects the highest possible ethical
conduct from the Senior Financial Management and their full compliance with the
Code is mandatory.





Any person who has
information concerning any violation of the Code by any member of the Senior
Financial Management shall promptly bring such information to the attention of
the Vice President and General Counsel of the Company.  The Vice
President and General Counsel will refer complaints, as necessary, to the Board
of Directors of the Company or an appropriate Committee of the Board, for
resolution.  Violations of the Code may subject the offending employee
to appropriate actions, such as censure, suspension or termination, as
determined by the Board of Directors or an appropriate Committee of the
Board.  Such actions shall be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing
and to promote accountability for adherence to the Code.  The Board of
Directors or an appropriate Committee of the Board, shall consider any request
for a waiver of the Code and any amendments to the Code.  All such
waivers or amendments shall be disclosed promptly as required by law or
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
regulation.





All members of the
Senior Financial Management shall:





1.
            Engage in,
      and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of
      actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
      relationships;





2.
            Provide full,
      fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and
      documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other
      public communications by the
Company;





3.
            Comply with
      all applicable governmental laws, rules and
  regulations;





4.
            Promptly
      report any possible violations of the Code to the Vice President and
      General Counsel; and





5.
            Be held
      accountable for adherence to the
Code.
#### In the Matter of Maurice Cotton, II, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent. (And Three Other Related Proceedings.)

Casey, J.

Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by four orders of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review four determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

In each of these proceedings, petitioner, an inmate in the State prison system, objects to a separate and distinct determination which found him guilty of violating certain prison rules. The record establishes that petitioner refused to attend the administrative hearings on the disciplinary charges and, therefore, he waived any right to challenge the results of those proceedings because of alleged procedural irregularities *(see, Matter of Morrison v Coughlin,*101 AD2d 943, *lv denied*63 NY2d 605). As to petitioner’s challenge to the evidentiary support for the various findings, the misbehavior report in each case, authored by a person who witnessed the incident specifically described therein, is clearly relevant and probative and constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 140). We therefore find no merit in petitioner’s arguments.

Determinations confirmed, and petitions dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R.B. Harris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Royal Holiday Mobile
Estates.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: September 22, 2003
                                  /s/ R. B. Harris
                                  ---------------------
                                  R. B. Harris, Acting Financial Officer/
                                  Director
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.61



                          AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT


         AMENDMENT made this 1st day of July, 1998, by and between Hadco
Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation with a usual place of business in
Salem, New Hampshire (hereinafter the "Company"), and Andrew E. Lietz, of Rye,
New Hampshire (hereinafter the "Optionee"), to the Option Agreement between the
parties dated February 26, 1997 in which the Optionee was granted options for
Forty Thousand (40,000) shares of Hadco Corporation Common Stock.

         WHEREAS, both parties consider the Optionee's stock option arrangements
with the Company to be an integral part of his compensation package; and

         WHEREAS, the Company has recently reviewed compensation arrangements
with its top management; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee have agreed upon a revised
provision with respect to the retirement of the Optionee.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other mutual
covenants contained herein, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

         1.       To strike Section 2(c)(1) and substitute therefor new Section
2(c)(1) as follows: "Any unvested or unexercised option granted hereunder shall
terminate and become void at midnight on the thirtieth (30th) day after the
Optionee's employment with the Company is terminated for any reason other than
disability, death, or retirement after age 61, but in no event may the option be
exercised later than the specified expiration date of the option."







<PAGE>   2



         2.       To strike Section 2(c)(3) and substitute therefor new Section
2(c)(3) as follows: "In the event the employment of the Optionee terminates by
reason of retirement from the Company after Optionee has reached age 61, any
option granted hereunder shall continue to vest and become exercisable on the
same schedule as set forth in Section 2(a) and shall expire on the same date as
provided in Section 2(b) hereof."

         3.       Except as specifically set forth herein, the original terms
and provisions of the Option Agreement of February 26, 1997 (unless otherwise
changed or amended by operation of amendment of the November 29, 1995 Hadco
Stock Option Plan) between the parties are hereby ratified and confirmed.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the
date first above written.





                                        Hadco Corporation





/s/ Patricia Randall                        By: /s/ Horace H. Irvine
--------------------------------            ------------------------------------
Witness


/s/ James C. Hamilton                       By: /s/ Andrew E. Lietz
--------------------------------            ------------------------------------
Witness                                     Andrew E. Lietz








                                       2
Exhibit 13.1

             Rule 13a-14b Certification of Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the Annual Report of New World Batteries, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, , Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 27, 2008


/s/ Marcus Weston
-----------------
Marcus Weston
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### TUNNELL v. STATE.

No. 26744.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the- State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. A jury assessed the punishment at a fine of $250.

All proceedings appear regular in every respect. The record on áppcal contains no statement of facts, and no bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.