alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <ARTICLE>                                                      5
    <LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summary financial information
    extracted from audited financial statements for the
    year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

    </LEGEND>
    <MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
    <CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

    <S>                                     <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
    <PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
    <PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
    <EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
    <CASH>                                                 8,521,370
    <SECURITIES>                                                   0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                            435,918
    <ALLOWANCES>                                            (226,500)
    <INVENTORY>                                                    0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
    <PP&E>                                                48,087,043
    <DEPRECIATION>                                       (15,734,329)
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        44,178,753
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
    <BONDS>                                                        0
    <COMMON>                                                       0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
    <PREFERRED>                                                    0
    <OTHER-SE>                                            42,847,125
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          44,178,753
    <SALES>                                                        0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      10,941,322
    <CGS>                                                          0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,326,101
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        4,847,538
    <INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    4,847,538
    <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
    <CHANGES>                                                      0
    <NET-INCOME>                                           4,847,538
    <EPS-BASIC>                                                11.51
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                              11.51


</TABLE>
#### CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC. *v.*BEVERLY P. HENDRYX ET AL.

(14823)

Foti, Lavery and Schaller, Js.

Argued December 5, 1995

decision released January 9, 1996

*Mark S. Steier,*for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

*William K. Eisenman,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tranquility, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 12, 2008 /s/ Dominick Pope Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.4


 


Amendment
No. 1 to Employment Agreement


 


This Amendment No.
1 to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of April 3, 2019, by and among B. Riley Financial,
Inc. (the “Company”) and Alan N. Forman (the “Executive”). The above parties are referred
to collectively herein as the “Parties,” and individually as a “Party.”


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
have entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2018 (the “Existing Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive desire to amend the Existing Agreement to revise certain terms contained therein relating to the Executive’s
ability to terminate the Existing Agreement for Good Reason due to a Change of Control (as such terms are defined in the Existing
Agreement).


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW THEREFORE, each
of the Parties, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby agree as follows:


 


1.           Definitions.
Each capitalized term not defined herein shall have the definition ascribed to it in the Existing Agreement.


 


2.           Amendment.
The Existing Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 


		(a)	By deleting the following proviso as set forth in Section
5(a):



 


“; provided
however, if such termination for Good Reason is due to a Change of Control, then the Executive may deliver such notice within 90
days following the Change of Control”


 


		(b)	By deleting Section 5.3.4(v) in its entirety.



 


3.           Full
Force and Effect. Except as specifically modified or amended by the terms of this Amendment, the Existing Agreement and all
provisions contained therein are, and shall continue, in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.


 


4.           Miscellaneous
Provisions.


 


(a)         Further
Assurances. Each Party, at the reasonable request of the other Party, and without additional consideration, shall, from time
to time (i) execute and deliver, or shall cause to be executed and delivered, such further certificates, agreements or instruments,
and (ii) take such other action, as the other Party may reasonably request, to consummate or implement the amendment contemplated
by this Amendment.


 






     


     


    

 


(b)       Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all
of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties have executed this Amendment on the date first written above.


 





	 	B. Riley Financial, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Phillip J. Ahn
	 	 	Name: Phillip J. Ahn

Title: CFO & COO

	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Alan N. Forman
	 	 	Alan N. Forman
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

Table of
subsidiaries of Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. (Shamir)

|Name                                 | Jurisdiction | Active/ Not active
|------------------------------------ | ------------ | ------------------
|Eyal Optical Industries (95) Ltd.    | Israel       | Active            
|Eyal Optics Holdings A.C.S. Ltd.     | Israel       | Not active        
|E. S. P. Optics Ltd.                 | Israel       | Not active        
|Aspect Optics Ltd                    | Israel       | Not active        
|Shamir Special Optical Products Ltd. | Israel       | Active            
|Shamir Israel Optical Marketing Ltd. | Israel       | Active            
|Shamir USA                           | USA          | Active            
|Shamir Insight, Inc.                 | USA          | Active            
|Shamir Optic GmbH                    | Germany      | Active            
|Inray Ltd.                           | Israel       | Active            
|Shamir Or Ltd.                       | Israel       | Active            
|Interoptic S.A.R.L.                  | France       | Active            
|Shamir France S.A.R.L.               | France       | Active            
|Shamir Optical Espana S.L.           | Spain        | Active            
|Shamir Portugal, LDA.                | Portugal     | Active            
|Shamir Uk Limited                    | UK           | Active            
|Cambridge Optical Group Limited      | UK           | Not active        
|Altra Optik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.   | Turkey       | Active            
|Centro Integral Optico S.A. de C.V.  | Mexico       | Active            
|Shalens S.A. de C.V.                 | Mexico       | Active            
|Spherical Optics (Pty) Ltd.          | South Africa | Active            



---

---
Exhibit 4.318

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 161215 dated April 28, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 28, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 26, 2017 No. 799-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Gold Horse International, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Adam Wasserman Name: Adam Wasserman Title: Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer  Dated: May 20, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-015:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2102 

To permit each commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission 

to appoint an electrical engineer or computer scientist to provide technical 

consultation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2011 

Mr. STEARNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To permit each commissioner of the Federal Communications 

Commission to appoint an electrical engineer or computer 

scientist to provide technical consultation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FCC Commissioners’ 

5 Technical Resource Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL STAFF. 

7 Section 4(f)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 

8 (47 U.S.C. 154(f)(2)) is amended by inserting after the 

9 first sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘Each commisVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:08 Jun 08, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2102.IH H2102

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2102 IH

1 sioner may also appoint an electrical engineer or computer 

2 scientist to provide the commissioner technical consulta3 tion when appropriate and to interface with the Office of 

4 Engineering and Technology, Commission Bureaus, and 

5 other technical staff of the Commission for additional 

6 technical input and resources, provided that such engineer 

7 or scientist holds an undergraduate or graduate degree 

8 from an institution of higher education in the field of ex9 pertise of such engineer or scientist.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
10.46
 
 Dresser-Rand S.A.31, Bld Winston Churchill76080 Le Havre cedex 7013FRANCETelex
    
    :190004Téléphone
    
    :02 35 25 52 25Télécopie
    
    :02 35 25 53 66:02 35 25 53 67
 Mme Nicoletta GIADROSSI
 Le Havre, December 29, 2008
   Start Date
 Location
  Position
  Contract of Mrs N. GIADROSSIP2/3
 Qualification




---



##### 



Compensation  
  
  
 Trial Period
 Worktime :
   Contract of Mrs N. GIADROSSI  P3/3




---



##### 



Retirement
    
    
    
    IREC ET CAPIMMEC15 Avenue du Centre78281 ST QUENTIN EN YVELINESMedical, death & disability
    
    
    
    GAN  géré par GRAS SAVOYELe Vendôme12-14 Rue du Centre93197 NOISY LE GRAND
   « read and approved »
    Didier LANGREE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2206 

To repeal a requirement that new employees of certain employers be 

automatically enrolled in the employer’s health benefits plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2011 

Mr. GUINTA (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. PENCE, Mr. FLORES, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. POSEY, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. 

DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. MULVANEY, and Mr. FLEISCHMANN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To repeal a requirement that new employees of certain employers be automatically enrolled in the employer’s health 

benefits plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Auto Enroll Repeal 

5 Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2206 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

2 Section 18A of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 

3 U.S.C. 218a), as added by section 1511 of the Patient 

4 Protection and Affordable Care Act, is repealed. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
`Promissory Note
$ 75,000.00 USD                 Temple, Texas                Date April 4, 2001


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, after date, without grace, in the manner, on the dates, and
in the amounts so herein stipulated, the Undersigned, Communicate Now.com Inc.

PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF : David Hancock, At Temple, Texas in Bell County 

              THE SUM OF SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00)

In lawful money of the United States of America, which shall be legal tender, in
payments of all debts and dues, public and private at the time of payment, and
to pay interest thereon from the date until maturity at the rate of 6.5% per
annum, payable as stipulated herein.

THIS NOTE IS DUE AND PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS TO WIT:

SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) principal due in one year (on or
before April 04, 2002). Interest of 4,500.00 per year payable in monthly amounts
of $375.00 on the 04th of each month

IT IS AGREED that time is of the essence of this agreement, and that in the
event of default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest when
due, the holder of this note may declare the entirety of the evidenced herby due
and payable without notice, and failure to exercise said option shall not
constitute a waiver on part of the holder of the right to exercise the same at
any other time.

IN THE EVENT of default in the making of any payment herein provided, either or
principal or interest, or in the event the entirety of said note evidenced
hereby is declared due, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10.0% per annum
from such time.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES to pay all expenses incurred, including an
additional 10.0% on the amount of principal and interest hereof as attorney's
fees, all of which shall become part of the principal hereof, if this note is
placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or if collected by suite or
through any probate, bankruptcy or other legal proceedings,

EACH MAKER, SURETY and endorser waives demand, grace, notice, presentment for
payment, and protest and agrees and consents that this note an the liens
securing its payment, may be renewed, and the time of payment extended without
notice, and without releasing any of the parties.


                             CommunicateNow.Com Inc.

                            David Hancock, President`
#### R. W. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27674.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 22, 1955.

W. G. Abbott, Midland, for appellant.

Hulon B. Brown, County Atty., John R. Culver, City Atty., Midland, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for a violation of a city ordinance regulating .the parking of motor vehicles, and the punishment assessed is a fine of $5.

This -is a companion case to that of Richardson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 280 S.W.2d 752.

For the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the appeal in the present instance is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.2








Page 1


Exhibit 4.2
















Page 2


Exhibit 4.2
























Page 3


Exhibit 4.2
















Page 4


Exhibit 4.2


















Page 5



Exhibit 4.2
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50278 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RICKY PORTILLO AGUILAR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-284-3
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ricky Portillo Aguilar pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess 100 grams or more of heroin within 1,000 feet of a school and possession with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin. He was sentenced to 84 months in prison. Aguilar argues that the district court clearly erred in reducing his base offense level by two levels for his minor participation in the offense rather than by three- or four-levels for his mi nimal or less than minor participation in the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-50278

2 offense. The advisory Sentencing Guidelines provide for a reduction in the base offense level ofa “minor” or a “minimal” participant and a participant who falls between a “minor” and “minimal” participant. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. To merit a reduction under § 3B1.2, the defendant must have been “substanti ally less culpable” than the average participant. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A). The role of a defendant in the offense isa factual determination thatwe reviewfor clear error. United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2005). Aguilar’s suggestion that he was entitled to a three- or four-level adjustment because he was involved in only one drug delivery is faulty. This court has upheld the denial of minimal role status where the defendant was recruited as a courier for a single shipment of a large quantity of drugs. See United States v. Gallegos, 868 F.2d 711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989); U nited States v. Rojas, 868 F.2d 1409, 1410 (5th Cir. 1989). Aguilar was apprehended with 378.3 grams of heroin. Although he was involved in a purportedly single instance of drug trafficking, the relatively large quantity of heroin represents a serious crime “with serious consequences for the public.” G allegos, 868 F.2d at 713; see also United States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989). Moreover, Aguilar provided no evidence, apart from his own self-serving statements, showing that he was substantially less culpable than other participants. The district court did not clearly err in denying him a more generous role adjustment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Nathan Raymond WINGATE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28274.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 21, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, Staté’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

' PER CURIAM.

This is a conviction .for the felony offense of drunken driving, with .punishment assessed at ninety days in jail.

Appellant has filed his affidavit stating that he desires to have his appeal" in this case dismissed.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Global Telecom & Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard D. Calder, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 19, 2013

/s/ Richard D. Calder, Jr.Richard D. Calder, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer