alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.4


AMENDMENT


TO THE


SALLIE MAE 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN




This Amendment to the Sallie Mae 401(k) Savings Plan, as most recently restated effective as of January 1, 2018, is effective as of the date set forth below by SLM Corporation (the “Company”).
WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Sallie Mae 401(k) Savings Plan, originally effective as of April 1, 1974 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan, by action of its Board of Directors (the “Board”) or its designee, pursuant to Section 12.01 of the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Board has delegated certain powers and authority related to the Plan, including amendment authority for the Plan, to the SLM Retirement Committee (the “Committee”); and


WHEREAS, the Company has determined that the Plan shall be amended in the following particular, effective as of the date indicated below:


NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in the following particular, effective as of the date provided below:


		
	1.
	Effective as of March 5, 2019, Section 5.03 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:




“5.03    SLM Stock Fund.      All investments in SLM Common Stock shall be maintained in the SLM Stock Fund. Each Employee described in Section 1.02(a) may allocate contributions, if any, to the SLM Stock Fund. Each individual described in Section 1.02(b) and each individual described in Section 1.02(c) shall be prohibited from increasing their holdings in the SLM Stock Fund and may elect to liquidate their holdings in the SLM Stock Fund and invest the proceeds in any other investment alternative offered under the Plan.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends declared on SLM Common Stock maintained in the SLM Stock Fund pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed to be reinvested in SLM Common stock maintained in the SLM Stock Fund in accordance with the Plan’s recordkeeping procedures.”













FURTHER RESOLVED, that the members of the Committee (and any employee of SLM Corporation authorized by the Committee) are hereby authorized and directed to take all such actions, execute all such documents, and undertake any other actions that are necessary or desirable, in their discretion, to effectuate the foregoing in connection with the implementation of the above described actions.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on March 1, 2019.




SLM CORPORATION
    
By:    /s/ Bonnie Rumbold_____________
Bonnie Rumbold
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2079 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, 

as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2079 EH

1 SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 10 Main Street in East Rock4 away, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘John J. Cook Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John J. Cook Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2079 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Rockaway, New York, as the ‘‘John J. Cook Post al Service located at 10 Main Street in East
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of
Segway IV Corp. for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003, I, Donny Smith, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway IV Corp. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Segway IV Corp.

Dated:  November 14, 2003

SEGWAY IV CORP.


By: /s/ Donny Smith
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:33 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: 120 Day Extension Requests 

Thanks! 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:32 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Subject: 120 Day Extension Requests 

Cortney – 

I actually found two of them – the one you’re looking for that is a bipartisan letter, and a second 

letter from Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC). Please let me know if you have any questions/concerns. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Office: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

************************************* 

 DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt 

************************************* 

<< 5.22.14-senate-ghg-dear-colleague-letter.pdf >> 

<< 140521 Letter to Admin McCarthy.pdf >> 




KAYR. HAGAIM

NORTH CAROLINA

United States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3309

COMMITTEES:

ARMED SERVICES

BANKING, HOUSING, AND

URBAN AFFAIRS

HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR,

AND PENSIONS

SMALL BUSINESS AND

ENTREPRENEURSHIP

May 21, 2014

The Honorable Gina McCarthy

Administrator

Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

I write to request that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide at least a 120-

day comment period for the upcoming proposal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions

from existing power plants.

Addressing carbon emissions from existing generation units presents challenges and

opportunities. It will almost certainly be among the most technically complex regulations

to be considered under the Clean Air Act. While the science on the reality of global

warming is clear, any effort to reduce carbon emissions will benefit from collaboration

and dialogue between diverse stakeholders and interested parties.

Balancing environmental priorities with economic and technological challenges are

paramount to the ultimate success of any rule seeking to combat global warming. I

believe that providing ample opportunity for diverse viewpoints to be shared on this

forthcoming proposal is a means toward achieving that objective.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Kay R. Hagan

United States Senator

521 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3309

(202)224-6342

701 Green Valley Road, Suite 201

Greensboro, NC 27408

(336)333-5311

Toll Free: (877) 852-9462

310 New Bern Avenue

Raleigh, NC 27601

(919)856-4630

1520 South Boulevard, Suite 205

Charlotte, NC 28203

(704) 334-2448

82 Patton Avenue, Suite 635

Asheville, NC 28801

(828)257-6510

website: www.hagan.senate.gov

e-mail: www.hagan.senate.gov/contact

PRINTED ON RECYCLED paper

301 South Evans Street, Suite 102

Greenville, NC 27858

(252)754-0707
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Segway IV Corp. for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005, I, Donny Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Segway IV Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp.

|By: | /s/   Donny SmithDonny SmithChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 19, 2005
#### Ex parte DAVIS.

No. 26628.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1953.

*323Thomas, Thomas & Jones, Big Spring, for appellant..

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner. -

Relator in the court below, appellant here, is under separate indictments for murder and assault with intent to murder.

Upon application, bail was fixed in the sum of $15,000 in the murder case and $5,-000 in the assault-with-intent-to-murder case, the total amount of bail required being $20,000.

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court refusing to reduce the amount of bail in the murder case.

There is testimony showing that the relator can make a bond or bonds in the two cases not exceeding the total amount of $10,000, and that he cannot make the amount of bail required.

No facts accompany the record showing or suggesting the extent, manner, or circumstances under which the crimes charged were committed. The order granting and fixing bail was based upon the fact of indictment, alone.

Ability or inability of the accused to make bond does not, alone, control in fixing bail. The. circumstances of the alleged crime and punishment permitted are to be looked to. Art. 281, G.C.P.; Ex parte Brooks, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 535, 78 S.W.2d 183; Ex parte Burleson, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 75, 109 S.W.2d 200.

To hold, under this record, that the bail fixed by the trial judge should be -reduced would be tantamount to holding that, as a matter of law, a $15,000 bail in a murder case is unreasonable and' excessive. This -we are not authorized to-do. Ex parte Cascio, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 288, 144 S.W.2d 886, appears to be directly in point and here controlling.

The judgment in refusing reduction of 'bail is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
#### John C. HARRIS and Orville E. Harris, Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27382.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is rape; the punishment, 5 years for John C. Harris and 10 years for Orville E. Harris.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EKA HARYATY TANTALIS; RONY

AGUS,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71358

Agency Nos. A095-599-566

 A095-599-565

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Eka Haryaty Tantalis and her husband, Rony Agus, natives and citizens of

Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

FILED

FEB 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JT/Research 2 07-71358

application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the agency’s

decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. INS v. Elias-Zacarias,

502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioners did

not suffer past persecution because the rape Tantalis suffered was not on account

of a protected ground, see Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir. 2001), Agus

failed to establish that the government was unwilling or unable to control his

persecutors with respect to the 1996 motorcycle incident, see Castro-Perez v.

Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1071-72 (9th Cir. 2005), and the remaining incidents did

not rise to the level of persecution, see Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th

Cir. 1995). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that

petitioners did not show sufficient individualized risk to demonstrate a

well-founded fear of future persecution. Cf. Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F .3d 922,

927-29 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, their asylum claim fails.

Because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, it necessarily

follows that they cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of

removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00194

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF B.D., J.D., AND

B.D., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 233rd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 233

- 538935

-- 13 )

October 28, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s o rder . It is ordered that the order of the tr ia l court is

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Suddert h
1

Filed 4/11/18



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, )

) S224564

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

) Ct.App. 4/1 D063428

v. )

) San Diego County

LEONEL CONTRERAS and ) Super. Ct. No. SCD236438

WILLIAM STEVEN RODRIGUEZ, )

)

Defendants and Appellants. )

________________________________ ___ )

ORDER MODIF YI N G OPINION

THE COURT:

The opinion in this matter , which was filed February 26, 2018, and appears at 4

Cal.5th 349, is modified as follows:

In the second full paragraph starting on page 363, beginning “ The record in this

case ,” the sentence, “ An opportunity t o obtain release does not seem ‘meaningful’ or

‘realistic’ within the meaning of Graham if the chance of living long enough to meet that

opportunity is roughly the same as a co in toss” is modified to read as follows: “ An

opportunity t o obtain release does not seem ‘meaningful’ or ‘realistic’ within the meaning

of Graham if the chance of living long enough to make use of that opportunity is roughly

the same as a co in toss. (Cf. dis. opn. of Cantil

- Sakauye, C

. J., post , at p. 394 .) ”

This modification do es not affect the judgment.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 4, 2009 

0128 

Order 

 

February 4, 2009 

137420 

BETHANY A. GORDON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137420 

 COA: 284874 

WCAC: 07-000014 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Mintz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/David Mintz*
--------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 31, 2006

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1986 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the production 

period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2011 

Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. BOUSTANY, 

and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination 

of the production period for distilled spirits under section 

263A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aged Distilled Spirits 

5 Competitiveness Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1986 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN DE2 TERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR 

3 DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 263A. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general exceptions) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(5) EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS

9 IN DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR

10 DISTILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this sub11 section, the production period for distilled spirits 

12 shall be determined without regard to any period al13 located to the natural aging process.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to production periods beginning 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2178 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2178

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 
    against income tax for the cost of passports and other enhanced 
  identification documents required to comply with the June 1, 2009, 
      implementation of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2011

Mr. Higgins (for himself and Ms. Hochul) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 
    against income tax for the cost of passports and other enhanced 
  identification documents required to comply with the June 1, 2009, 
      implementation of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Fee Relief Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR COST OF PASSPORTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION 
              REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH WESTERN HEMISPHERE TRAVEL 
              INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) 
is amended by inserting after section 36C the following new section:

``SEC. 36D. TRAVEL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH WESTERN HEMISPHERE 
              TRAVEL INITIATIVE.

    ``In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a credit 
against the tax imposed by this subtitle for the taxable year an amount 
equal to the cost paid or incurred by the taxpayer to obtain any travel 
document--
            ``(1) which complies with the plan developed under section 
        7209(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
        Act of 2004, and
            ``(2) which is for the identification of the taxpayer, the 
        taxpayer's spouse, or any dependent of the taxpayer with 
        respect to whom the taxpayer is allowed a deduction under 
        section 151.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 31, United 
        States Code, is amended by inserting ``36D,'' after ``36C,''.
            (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part IV of 
        subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting 
        after the item relating to section 36C the following new item:

``Sec. 36D. Travel documents required to comply with Western Hemisphere 
                            Travel Initiative.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```