alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|                                  |                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Sign:                                 | /S/    Richard A. Smith |   |
| Richard A. Smith                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 9, 2007                           |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or asa separate disclosure document.  A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7076

RICKY L. HEFNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOHNATHAN HEATH JONES, Officer, in his official and individual capacities; KIMBERLY OSBORNE, f/k/a Kimberly Osborne

- Evans, in her official and individual capacities , Defendants

- Appellees , and SYLVA POLICE DEPARTMENT, in their individual and official capacities; JOHN DOE, in his official and individual capacities; JANE DOE, in her official and individual capacities; CITY OF SYLVA, in their official and individual capacities; COUNTY OF JACKSON, i n their official and individual capacities; JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S OFFICE, in their official and individual capacities; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, in their official and individual capacities , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00227

- MR )

Submitted : May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7076 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ricky L. Hefner , Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Bader , Raleigh, North Carolina , Jake William Stewart , CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7076 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Ricky L. Hefner appeals the district court’s order granting Johnathan Jones’ and Kimberly Osborne’s motion for summary judgment and denying Hefner’s motion to appoint counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Hefner v. Jones , No.
1:21

- cv - 00227

- MR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2023) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7076 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2222 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2222

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of 
   the Environmental Protection Agency to publish annually a list of 
vehicles that satisfy requirements for certification as a low emission 
         and energy-efficient vehicle, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2011

 Mr. Donnelly of Indiana (for himself and Mr. McCotter) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of 
   the Environmental Protection Agency to publish annually a list of 
vehicles that satisfy requirements for certification as a low emission 
         and energy-efficient vehicle, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Municipal Fleet Modernization Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. LIST OF LOW EMISSION AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT VEHICLES.

    Section 166 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) List of Low Emission and Energy-Efficient Vehicles.--Not 
later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Municipal Fleet 
Modernization Act of 2011, and annually thereafter, the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency shall update and publish in the 
Federal Register a list of vehicles that satisfy requirements for 
certification as a low emission and energy-efficient vehicle.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-40766

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Charles Hawkins, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:22-CR-16-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Charles Hawkins, Jr., has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Hawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-40766 Document: 00516830490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023
No. 22-40766

2

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-40766 Document: 00516830490 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2023
#### In the Matter of George M. Dentes, as District Attorney of the County of Tompkins, Petitioner, v Betty D. Friedlander, as Judge of the County Court of Tompkins County, et al., Respondents.

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Proceeding pursuant to *758CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit implementation of two orders of respondent County Judge of Tompkins County which disqualified petitioner from prosecuting a certain criminal action.

Petitioner, the Tompkins County District Attorney, seeks to restrain enforcement of an order of respondent County Judge of Tompkins County which disqualified petitioner and his staff from prosecuting second degree murder charges leveled against respondent Ernest W. Vann, and appointed a special prosecutor to do so *(see,*County Law § 701). The circumstance giving rise to the challenged disqualification is the fact that two years earlier a part-time Assistant District Attorney associated with the District Attorney’s office, consisting in all of seven attorneys, had, in the course of his private law practice, represented Vann in a visitation matter before Tompkins County Family Court.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding requests the extraordinary remedy of prohibition. Prohibition "does not lie except in narrowly defined situations when the court is clearly exceeding its authorized powers” *(Matter of Kavanagh v Vogt,*88 AD2d 1049, *affd*58 NY2d 678). The correct standard to be applied in disqualifying a prosecutor is a question of law not reviewable by an article 78 petition in the nature of prohibition *(Matter of Kavanagh v Vogt,*58 NY2d 678, 679, *supra; contra, Matter of Morgenthau v Crane,*113 AD2d 20, 23).

Petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2242 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 

Import and Export Act regarding penalties for cocaine offenses, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2011 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BARTLETT, 

Ms. NORTON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. COHEN, Ms. WATERS, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. 

MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act regarding penalties 

for cocaine offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Cocaine 

5 Sentencing Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2242 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CO2 CAINE OFFENSES WHERE THE COCAINE IN3 VOLVED IS COCAINE BASE. 

4 (a) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.—The following 

5 provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

6 801 et seq.) are repealed: 

7 (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A). 

8 (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B). 

9 (3) The sentence beginning ‘‘Notwithstanding 

10 the preceding sentence’’ in section 404(a). 

11 (b) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EXPORT

12 ACT.—The following provisions of the Controlled Sub13 stances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.) 

14 are repealed: 

15 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1). 

16 (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-1


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                 Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT


/s/ Kevin Meyers                                 Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
##### 



(TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LOGO) Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Thomas M. Brandt, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
             
                 
December 8, 2004

Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.Sr. Vice President & CFO
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0384. ROSAMUND P. BRAUNROT v. RONALD G. KOVACS.

RosamundBraunrot andRonald Kovacs were divorced in 2014. Subsequently,

Braunrot filed a petition against Kovacs, seeking a declaratory judgment concerning

the portion of Kovacs’s retirement accounts to which she was entitled under the

parties’ settlement agreement. The trial court ruled in Kovacs’s favor, and Braunrot

appealed therefrom. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

The Georgia Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all divorce and alimony

cases, including those cases ancillary to the divorce proceedings. See Ga. Const.

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6); Morris v. Surges, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d

84) (2008). As the subject matter of this appeal relates to the equitable division of

marital property, this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/23/2015

November 23, 2015
Exhibit 99.1





PVH Corp. Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend








NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)— February 8, 2023 -- PVH Corp. [NYSE:PVH], announced the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of PVH Corp. declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0375 per share payable on March 29, 2023 to stockholders of record on March 8, 2023.








About PVH Corp.





PVH is the growth platform for Calvin Klein and TOMMY HILFIGER . Through driving brand strength and relevance, we are connecting our global, iconic brands closer to where the consumer is going than ever before, today and with future generations. Guided by our values and enabled by our scale and global reach, we are driving fashion forward for good, as one team with one vision and one plan. That’s the Power of Us. That’s the Power of PVH.





Follow us on Facebook , Instagram , Twitter and LinkedIn .








Contact:


Mark D. Fischer


Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary


(212) 381-3509
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
 March 22, 2017
 
 
 Contact:  Dana Perlman
    
 
  
  
  
 CALVIN KLEIN Tommy Hilfiger Van Heusen IZOD ARROW Speedo Warner's Olga
 
 Speedo
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge, based
upon their review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, of Southern Community Bancorp (the Report), that:

|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                          
|    
|(ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in
the Report.

|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Stephen McGee                    
|Date: November 11, 2002 |  | Stephen McGee
Chief Financial Officer

35
EXHIBIT  32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Huayang International Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wang Yufei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:                                        /s/  Wang  Yufei
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Wang  Yu  fei
                                             Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2371

WILLIAM ALEXANDER CASTILLO-BENAVIDES,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: June 29, 2016 Decided: July 6, 2016

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Alexander Castillo-Benavides, Petitioner Pro Se. Scott 

Michael Marconda, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Alexander Castillo-Benavides petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing 

his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his requests 

for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the 

Convention Against Torture. 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

petitioner’s informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Here, the 

Board affirmed the IJ’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal 

on the ground that Castillo-Benavides lacked credibility. In his 

informal brief, however, Castillo-Benavides fails to challenge the

adverse credibility determination or the agency’s denial of his 

request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. In 

failing to challenge the basis for the agency’s denial of relief, 

Castillo-Benavides has forfeited appellate review of the Board’s 

order. See Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th 

Cir. 2013) (deeming issues not raised in opening brief waived); 

Niang v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 505, 510 n.5 (4th Cir. 2007) (same).

Even if the issue was not forfeited, however, substantial 

evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, and 

the IJ provided “specific, cogent reasons” for rejecting CastilloBenavides’ claims. See Ilunga v. Holder, 777 F.3d 199, 206-07 

(4th Cir. 2015) (explaining credibility determinations). The 

independent evidence that Castillo-Benavides submitted with his 
3

asylum application contradicted his own version of events and 

therefore does not overcome the adverse credibility determination. 

See id. at 213. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re CastilloBenavides (B.I.A. Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED