alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  I, Subrah S. Iyar, certify that:
  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WebEx Communications, Inc.;
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
   5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  
 Date: November 8, 2004
 
 
 /s/ SUBRAH S. IYAR
 Subrah S. Iyar
 Chief Executive Officer
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 18-1261

________________

JUAN TOMAS SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent

________________

On Petition for Review of a Final Order 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Immigration Judge: Honorable Kuyomars “Q” Golparvar

(Agency No. A089-607-146)

________________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

September 24, 2018

Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: September 28, 2018)

________________

OPINION*

________________

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

Juan Tomas Sanchez-Rodriguez asks us to reverse the denial by the Board of 

Immigration Appeals of a discretionary waiver of inadmissibility. We lack jurisdiction to 

do so, and thus we dismiss his petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Cospito v. Att’y 

Gen., 539 F.3d 166, 170 (3d Cir. 2008).

Sanchez-Rodriguez first entered the United States in 2000. He later married a 

United States citizen, and his status was adjusted to lawful permanent resident. SanchezRodriguez’s immigration problems began after he was convicted for fraud and identity 

theft, and the Government sought to remove him from the United States as an “alien who 

is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission[.]” 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). 

To avoid removal, Sanchez-Rodriguez requested an adjustment of status, and it is 

undisputed that he cannot obtain the relief he requests without a discretionary waiver of 

inadmissibility. See id. § 1182(h). Waivers may be granted, among other reasons, if 

removal would result in “extreme hardship” for a citizen or a permanent resident who is a 

member of the petitioner’s immediate family. See id. The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) held

both that Sanchez-Rodriguez was statutorily ineligible for a waiver and that, even if he 

were eligible, the IJ would exercise his discretion to deny the waiver because SanchezRodriguez’s criminal record outweighed the hardship his family would suffer from his 

removal. The Board dismissed his appeal. 

Sanchez-Rodriguez disagrees with the IJ and Board’s balancing of the factors that 

bear on whether they decide to grant a discretionary waiver. But Congress has decreed 

that “our jurisdiction does not extend to an agency’s factual and discretionary 

determinations underlying the denial of waivers based on an analysis involving extreme 

hardship.” Cospito, 539 F.3d at 170; accord 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). We cannot 
3

second guess whether his particular circumstances warrant a waiver. Accordingly, we 

dismiss his petition for review.
#### TARWATER v. STATE.

No. 26824.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1954.

Judgment Set Aside on Rehearing April 28, 1954.

See 267 S.W.2d 410.

Harris E. Lofthus, Amarillo, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for attempting to pass a forged instrument; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

As reflected by the record before us, a notice of appeal was given and filed when the motion for new trial was overruled on Oc-' tober 20, 1953; the record also reflects that ten days later (on October 30, 1953), a written notice of appeal was filed together with the trial court’s .order committing appellant to jail on failure to enter into a recognizance pending the decision of this court.

Under the provisions of Sec. 4 of Art. 759a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., the statement of facts must be filed within ninety days from the date of the notice of appeal.

The statement of facts in the instant case was filed in the trial court on January 25, 1954f which was seven days after expiration of the time allowed from the date of the original notice of appeal.

It is the holding of this court that the first notice of appeal shall control.

Inasmuch as the statement of facts was filed too late and may not be considered, the judgment is affirmed, as reversible error does not otherwise appear.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 17, 2010 /s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Techfaith Wireless Communication Technology Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Defu Dong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Date: November 13, 2013By:

/s/ Defu DongName:    Defu Dong
Title:      Chief Executive Officer
#### RIDGEWAY v. STATE.

No. 23401.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 19, 1946.

Graham Bruce and Raymond Stark, both •of Orange, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, ■for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for rape, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The indictment alleges the present of-Tense of rape, and further avers that appellant had theretofore been convicted of a similar offense.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Network Engines, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John H. Curtis, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated: February 14, 2003 |  | LOGO                                  
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                         |  | John H. Curtis Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

 CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

 JUSTICES

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

February 3, 2015

Ruth G. Malinas

Plunkett & Griesenbeck, Inc.

Catholic Life Building, suite 900

1635 N.E. Loop 410

San Antonio, TX 78209

Andrew T. Ward

Jeffrey J. Phillips

Winston & Strawn LLP

1111 Louisiana, 25th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Adolfo Campero, Jr.

State Bar No. 00793454

CAMPERO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

315 Calle del Norte, Suite 207

Laredo, Texas 78041

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-13-00094-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2012-CVT-001496-D1

Style: Dr. Hector Farias and Voices in Democratic Action (VIDA)

v.

Eduardo A. Garza and Uni-Trade Forwarding, L.C.

Dear Counsel:

The Supreme Court of Texas has this date requested that this court forward the file for the

above styled and numbered cause. The petition for review was filed on May 6, 2014. (The

Petition For Review Was Filed By Ms. Ruth G. Malinas). This court shall forward this case as

requested. An “EXPRESS FEE” (to cover the cost of forwarding the file) in the amount of

$25.00 is needed by February 13, 2015

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_____________________________

Luz Estrada

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53219

FILE COPY
* Dignity Health" 

Testimony of Dignity Health Regarding EPA and NHTSA's Proposed Phase 2 

Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Effici ency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Vehicles, Engines, and Trailers 

August 18, 2015 

On behalf of Dignity Health and over 400 care centers including hospitals, urgent and 

occupational care centers, imaging centers, home health, and primary care clinics, 

we commend EPA for taking action to address the fuel efficiency and GHG emissions 

from medium- and heavy-duty trucks. We strongly support the adoption of regulations 

requiring a 40% decrease in fuel consumption by 2025. 

Dignity Health's healing mission and values compel us to seek ways to further improve 

air quality and the health of communities throughout the Southwest. Strong Phase 2 

standards offer a rare opportunity to address serious health concerns associated with 

climate change and cut freight costs. 

Strict standards will provide incentives to increase investment in clean truck technology 

and help the U.S. meet federal ozone standards, which Dignity Health actively supports. 

Our nation's cmTent heavy-duty truck fleet poses significant health risks to Americans 

across the country. Freight trucks ctmently account for about half a billion tons of 

climate forcing GHG emissions per year and are the fastest growing single source of 

GHG emissions in the United States. 

With strong Phase 2 standards, the U.S. has the opportunity to improve air quality and 

increase related health benefits, while sending common-sense market signals to spur 

innovation and accelerate the development of cleaner, cost effective technologies. 

For these reasons, Dignity Health supports a strong Phase 2 standard requiring a 40% 

reduction in heavy truck fuel consumption by 2025. 

Thank you for your leadership on this important issue.
#### Ex parte Fred PHILLIPS v. STATE.

No. 28000.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1956.

William E. Davenport, San Angelo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is a companion case to Ex Parte Phillips, Tex.Cr., 285 S.W.2d 750.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment denying appellant relief is reversed.

The Sheriff of Tom Green County, Texas, is directed to release appellant, from custody upon his entering into a good and sufficient bond, to be approved by said sheriff and in the reasonable amount to be set by said sheriff, payable to the State of Texas and conditioned, as required by law, for appellant’s appearance before the Justice Court, Precinct No. 1, of Grayson County, Texas, instanter.
exhibit04_1.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



Exhibit 4.1


 


English Language Summary


 


Deed of
Indenture for the Issuance of Simple Unsubordinated Debentures, with Additional
Personal Guarantee, Not Convertible into Shares, in a Single Series, for Public
Placement with Limited Efforts of the First Issuance of TIM S.A., dated as of
January 9, 2019, between TIM S.A., as issuer, Simplific Pavarini Distribuidora
de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Ltda., as fiduciary agent, and TIM
Participações S.A., as guarantor. 


 


On January 9, 2019, TIM
S.A., or TIM, entered into a debentures indenture with Simplific Pavarini
Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Ltda., as fiduciary agent, and
TIM Participações S.A., or TIM Participações, as guarantor.


The debentures
will be offered through a public placement with limited efforts in accordance
with CVM Instruction 476. The leading underwriter is Banco Itaú BBA S.A., which
will intermediate the placement and distribution of the debentures to
professional investors as defined in CVM Instruction 539. TIM will use the
proceeds to reinforce the company’s working capital.


The total amount
of the issuance, in a single series, is of R$1,000,000,000 through the issuance
of 100,000 debentures. The debentures will have nominal value of R$10,000 on
the issuance date. The bookkeeping agent of the debentures and the settling
bank is Banco Bradesco S.A. The debentures are non-convertible and unsecured
with additional personal guarantee pursuant to article 58, caput, Law No.
6,404/76. For all legal purposes, the issuance date is January 15, 2019 and the
term of the debentures is of 18 months as from the issuance date. Therefore,
the maturity date is July 15, 2020.


The debentures
will be registered for (i) distribution in the primary market through the MDA –
Asset Distribution Module of B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão, or B3, and (ii)
trading in the secondary market through CETIP21 – Bonds and Securities, 
subject to financial settlement and electronic custody by B3.


The debentures
nominal value will not be monetarily adjusted but it is subject to interest
equal to 104.10% of the accumulated variation of the average daily rates of DI
(inter-financial deposits) of one day over extra-group, expressed in percentage
amount on a 252 business days basis, as calculated and disclosed by B3.


The indenture
contains standard provisions regarding extraordinary repayments, optional early
redemption by TIM, and acceleration, both automatic and non-automatic,
including without limitation bankruptcy procedures by TIM, or any judicial or
extrajudicial reorganization, default in obligations over R$100,000,000,
failure to make certain payments under the indenture, change of control, among
others.


TIM
Participações executed the indenture as a personal guarantor and it is jointly
and severally liable for the obligations assumed by TIM under the indenture.


The indenture
contains customary covenants for TIM and provisions regarding the rights and
obligations of the fiduciary agent. Moreover, TIM and TIM Participações gave
customary representations and warranties under the indenture.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1933 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1933

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify the requirements 
 for admission of nonimmigrant nurses in health professional shortage 
                                 areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2011

     Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, and Mr. Roskam) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify the requirements 
 for admission of nonimmigrant nurses in health professional shortage 
                                 areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION OF NONIMMIGRANT NURSES IN HEALTH 
              PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS.

    (a) Extension of Period of Authorized Admission.--Section 212(m)(3) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(m)(3)) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(3) The initial period of authorized admission as a nonimmigrant 
under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(c) shall be 3 years, and may be extended 
once for an additional 3-year period.''.
    (b) Number of Visas.--Section 212(m)(4) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(m)(4)) is amended by striking ``500.'' 
and inserting ``300.''.
    (c) Applicability.--
            (1) In general.--During the 3-year period beginning on the 
        commencement date described in paragraph (2), the amendments 
        made by section 2 of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas 
        Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-95), and the amendments made by 
        subsections (a) and (b) of this section, shall apply to 
        classification petitions filed for nonimmigrant status. This 
        period shall be in addition to the period described in section 
        2(e) of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.
            (2) Commencement date.--Not later than 60 days after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland 
        Security shall determine whether regulations are necessary to 
        implement the amendments made by subsection (a) and (b). If the 
        Secretary determines that no such regulations are necessary, 
        the commencement date described in this paragraph shall be the 
        date of such determination. If the Secretary determines that 
        regulations are necessary to implement subsection (a) or (b), 
        the commencement date described in this paragraph shall be the 
        date on which such regulations (in final form) take effect.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 16, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Omega Flex, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No 333-135515).

 

 

/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd.

 

VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.

 

March 16, 2009

Boston, Massachusetts
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 4, 2015

a1028

Order 

Clerk

November 4, 2015

150699

MINGA PERKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150699

COA: 317643

Wayne CC: 12-005905-NO

HENRY FORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.