Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices 14725 

systems. There would be no changes to 

the quality or quantity of nonradiological effluents. In addition, there 

would be no noticeable effect on 

socioeconomic conditions in the region, 

no environmental justice impacts, no air 

quality impacts, and no impacts to 

historic and cultural resources from the 

proposed action. Therefore, there are no 

significant non-radiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

For these reasons, the NRC concludes 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

exemption request. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

In addition to the proposed action, the 

NRC staff also considered denial of the 

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ 

alternative). Denial of the exemption 

request would result in no change in 

current environmental impacts. The 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

action and the alternative action would 

be similar. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

There are no unresolved conflicts 

concerning alternative uses of available 

resources under the proposed action. 

Agencies Consulted 

By email dated January 16, 2024, the 

NRC provided a copy of this draft EA to 

the Maine Department of Health and 

Human Services, Radiological Control 

Program, for review. By email dated 

January 30, 2024, Maine Department of 

Health & Human Services concurred 

with the NRC staff’s determination. 

Endangered Species Act Section 7 

Consultation 

Section 7 of the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), requires 

Federal agencies to consult with the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

regarding actions that may affect listed 

species or designated critical habitats. 

The ESA is intended to prevent further 

decline of endangered and threatened 

species and restore those species and 

their critical habitat. 

The NRC staff determined that a 

consultation under section 7 of the ESA 

is not required because the proposed 

action will not affect listed species or 

critical habitat. 

National Historic Preservation Act 

Section 106 Consultation 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (NHPA) requires 

Federal agencies to consider the effects 

of their undertakings on historic 

properties. As stated in the NHPA, 

historic properties are any prehistoric or 

historic district, site, building, structure, 

or object included in, or eligible for 

inclusion in the National Register of 

Historic Places. 

The NRC determined that the scope of 

activities described in this exemption 

request do not have the potential to 

cause effects on historic properties 

because the NRC’s approval of this 

exemption request will not authorize 

new construction or land disturbance 

activities. The NRC staff also 

determined that the proposed action is 

not a type of activity that has the 

potential to impact historic properties 

because the proposed action would 

occur within the established Maine 

Yankee site boundary. Therefore, in 

accordance with 36 CFR 800.3(a)(1), no 

consultation is required under section 

106 of NHPA. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The environmental impacts of the 

proposed action—an exemption from 

the requirements of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(2) 

allowing MYAPC to make withdrawals 

from the segregated account, on an 

annual basis, for SNF and GTCC waste 

management and non-radiological site 

restoration without prior notification to 

the NRC—have been reviewed under the 

requirements in 10 CFR part 51, which 

implement the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969, as amended. 

The proposed exemption would not 

have a significant adverse effect on the 

probability of an accident occurring and 

would not have any significant 

radiological or non-radiological impacts. 

The proposed exemption involves an 

exemption from requirements that are of 

a financial and/or administrative nature 

and would not have an impact on the 

human environment. Consistent with 10 

CFR 51.21, the NRC conducted the EA 

for the proposed exemption, and this 

FONSI incorporates by reference the EA 

in Section II of this document. 

Therefore, the NRC concludes that the 

proposed action will not have 

significant effects on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC has determined not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

IV. Availability of Documents 

The documents identified in the 

following table are available to 

interested persons through ADAMS, as 

indicated. 

Document description ADAMS accession No. 

Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(2) for the Maine Yankee 

ISFSI, dated March 31, 2023.

ML23113A005. 

Email to State of Maine providing draft environmental assessment related to Maine Yankee exemption request, dated January 16, 2024.ML24024A153. 

Response from State of Maine on draft EA/FONSI, dated January 30, 2024 .................................................. ML24033A284. 

Maine Yankee Decommissioning Funding Assurance Status Report, dated March 6, 2023 ........................... ML23068A011. 

Issuance of Amendment No. 172, to Facility Operating License No. DPR–36—Maine Yankee Atomic 

Power Station, dated September 30, 2005.

ML052380223 (package). 

Dated: February 22, 2024. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Yoira K. Diaz-Sanabria, 

Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing 

Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04077 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2024–0022] 

Information Collection: Generic 

Clearance for the Collection of 

Qualitative Feedback on Agency 

Service Delivery 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Renewal of existing information 

collection; request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) invites public 

comment on the renewal of Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval for an existing collection of 

information. The information collection 

is entitled, ‘‘Generic Clearance for the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
14726 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices 

Collection of Qualitative Feedback on 

Agency Service Delivery.’’ 

DATES: Submit comments by April 29, 

2024. Comments received after this date 

will be considered if it is practical to do 

so, but the Commission is able to ensure 

consideration only for comments 

received on or before this date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods; 

however, the NRC encourages electronic 

comment submission through the 

Federal rulemaking website: 

• Federal rulemaking website: Go to

https://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2024–0022. Address 

questions about Docket IDs in 

Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; 

telephone: 301–415–0624; email: 

Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical 

questions, contact the individuals listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document. 

• Mail comments to: David C.

Cullison, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, Mail Stop: T–6 A10M, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001. 

For additional direction on obtaining 

information and submitting comments, 

see ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David C. Cullison, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 

2084; email: Infocollects.Resource@

nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and

Submitting Comments

A. Obtaining Information

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2024–

0022 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information for this 

action. You may obtain publicly 

available information related to this 

action by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to

https://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2024–0022. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For 

problems with ADAMS, please contact 

the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) 

reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at 

301–415–4737, or by email to 

PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The supporting 

statement is available by accessing 

ADAMS Accession No. ML24032A076. 

• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you

may examine and order copies of 

publicly available documents, is open 

by appointment. To make an 

appointment to visit the PDR, please 

send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov 

or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415– 

4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern 

time (ET), Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

• NRC’s Clearance Officer: A copy of

the collection of information and related 

instructions may be obtained without 

charge by contacting the NRC’s 

Clearance Officer, David C. Cullison, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer, 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 

301–415–2084; email: 

Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov. 

B. Submitting Comments

The NRC encourages electronic

comment submission through the 

Federal rulemaking website (https://

www.regulations.gov). Please include 

Docket ID NRC–2024–0022, in your 

comment submission. 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information in 

comment submissions that you do not 

want to be publicly disclosed in your 

comment submission. All comment 

submissions are posted at https://

www.regulations.gov and entered into 

ADAMS. Comment submissions are not 

routinely edited to remove identifying 

or contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the NRC, then you should 

inform those persons not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

they do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in their comment submission. 

Your request should state that comment 

submissions are not routinely edited to 

remove such information before making 

the comment submissions available to 

the public or entering the comment into 

ADAMS. 

II. Background

In accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the NRC is requesting 

public comment on its intention to 

request the OMB’s approval for the 

information collection summarized 

below. 

1. The title of the information

collection: Generic Clearance for the 

Collection of Qualitative Feedback on 

Agency Service Delivery. 

2. OMB approval number: 3150–0217.

3. Type of submission: Extension.

4. The form number, if applicable:

Not applicable. 

5. How often the collection is required

or requested: On occasion and annually.

6. Who will be required or asked to

respond: Individuals and households; 

businesses and organizations; State, 

Local, or Tribal governments. 

7. The estimated number of annual

responses: 13,300. 

8. The estimated number of annual

respondents: 13,300. 

9. The estimated number of hours

needed annually to comply with the 

information collection requirement or 

request: 2,708. 

10. Abstract: The information

collection activity will garner 

qualitative customer and stakeholder 

feedback in an efficient, timely manner, 

for the purpose of improving service 

delivery. By qualitative feedback we 

mean information that provides useful 

insights on perceptions and opinions, 

but are not statistical surveys that yield 

quantitative results that can be 

generalized to the population of study. 

This feedback will provide insights into 

customer or stakeholder perceptions, 

experiences and expectations, provide 

an early warning of issues with service, 

or focus attention on areas where 

communication, training or changes in 

operations might improve delivery of 

products or services. These collections 

will allow for ongoing, collaborative and 

actionable communications between the 

Agency and its customers and 

stakeholders. It will also allow feedback 

to contribute directly to the 

improvement of program management. 

Feedback collected under this generic 

clearance will provide useful 

information, but it will not yield data 

that can be generalized to the overall 

population. This type of generic 

clearance for qualitative information 

will not be used for quantitative 

information collections that are 

designed to yield reliably actionable 

results, such as monitoring trends over 

time or documenting program 

performance. Such data uses require 

more rigorous designs that address: the 

target population to which 

generalizations will be made, the 

sampling frame, the sample design 

(including stratification and clustering), 

the precision requirements or power 

calculations that justify the proposed 

sample size, the expected response rate, 

methods for assessing potential 

nonresponse bias, the protocols for data 

collection, and any testing procedures 

that were or will be undertaken prior to 

fielding the study. Depending on the 

degree of influence the results are likely 

to have, such collections may still be 

eligible for submission for other generic 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2024 / Notices 14727 

mechanisms that are designed to yield 

quantitative results. 

III. Specific Requests for Comments 

The NRC is seeking comments that 

address the following questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

Please explain your answer. 

2. Is the estimate of the burden of the 

information collection accurate? Please 

explain your answer. 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection on respondents 

be minimized, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology? 

Dated: February 23, 2024. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David C. Cullison, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04079 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Product Change—Priority Mail and 

USPS Ground Advantage® Negotiated 

Service Agreement 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives 

notice of filing a request with the Postal 

Regulatory Commission to add a 

domestic shipping services contract to 

the list of Negotiated Service 

Agreements in the Mail Classification 

Schedule’s Competitive Products List. 

DATES: Date of required notice: February 

28, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

United States Postal Service® hereby 

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 21, 

2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory 

Commission a USPS Request to Add 

Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage® Contract 192 to 

Competitive Product List. Documents 

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket 

Nos. MC2024–194, CP2024–200. 

Sean Robinson, 

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04135 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Investment Company Act Release No. 

35144] 

Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the 

Investment Company Act of 1940 

February 23, 2024. 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’). 

ACTION: Notice of applications for 

deregistration under section 8(f) of the 

Investment Company Act of 1940. 

The following is a notice of 

applications for deregistration under 

section 8(f) of the Investment Company 

Act of 1940 for the month of February 

2024. A copy of each application may be 

obtained via the Commission’s website 

by searching for the applicable file 

number listed below, or for an applicant 

using the Company name search field, 

on the SEC’s EDGAR system. The SEC’s 

EDGAR system may be searched at 

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/ 

legacy/companysearch.html. You may 

also call the SEC’s Public Reference 

Room at (202) 551–8090. An order 

granting each application will be issued 

unless the SEC orders a hearing. 

Interested persons may request a 

hearing on any application by emailing 

the SEC’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov and serving the relevant 

applicant with a copy of the request by 

email, if an email address is listed for 

the relevant applicant below, or 

personally or by mail, if a physical 

address is listed for the relevant 

applicant below. Hearing requests 

should be received by the SEC by 5:30 

p.m. on March 19, 2024, and should be 

accompanied by proof of service on 

applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, 

for lawyers, a certificate of service. 

Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under the Act, 

hearing requests should state the nature 

of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing 

upon the desirability of a hearing on the 

matter, the reason for the request, and 

the issues contested. Persons who wish 

to be notified of a hearing may request 

notification by writing to the 

Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov. 

ADDRESSES: The Commission: 

Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shawn Davis, Assistant Director, at 

(202) 551–6413 or Chief Counsel’s 

Office at (202) 551–6821; SEC, Division 

of Investment Management, Chief 

Counsel’s Office, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–8010. 

AlphaMark Investment Trust [File No. 

811–22213] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. On July 31, 2023, 

applicant made a liquidating 

distribution to its shareholders based on 

net asset value. Expenses of $2,177.23 

incurred in connection with the 

liquidation were paid by the applicant. 

Filing Dates: The application was 

filed on October 18, 2023 and amended 

on February 13, 2024. 

Applicant’s Address: C/O Ultimus 

Fund Solutions, LLC, 225 Pictoria Drive, 

Suite 450, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246. 

BNY Mellon State Municipal Bond 

Funds [File No. 811–04906] 

Summary: Applicant seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. The applicant has 

transferred its assets to BNY Mellon 

AMT Free Municipal Bond Fund a 

series of BNY Mellon Municipal Funds, 

Inc., and on January 27, 2023 made a 

final distribution to its shareholders 

based on net asset value. Expenses of 

$338,820 incurred in connection with 

the reorganization were paid by the 

applicant. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on January 25, 2024. 

Applicant’s Address: c/o BNY Mellon 

Investment Adviser, Inc., 240 

Greenwich Street, New York, New York 

10286. 

LPLA Separate Account One [File No. 

811–08890] 

Summary: Applicant, a unit 

investment trust, seeks an order 

declaring that it has ceased to be an 

investment company. The applicant is 

not making and does not presently 

propose to make a public offering of its 

securities and will continue to operate 

in reliance on section 3(c)(1) of the 1940 

Act. 

Filing Date: The application was filed 

on October 13, 2023. 

Applicant’s Address: c/o Fidelity 

Security Life Insurance Company, 3130 

Broadway, Kansas City, Missouri 64111. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Investment Management, pursuant to 

delegated authority. 

Sherry R. Haywood, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–04147 Filed 2–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1