alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2079

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the ``John J. Cook Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN J. COOK POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Cook Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Cook Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Ex parte Marion GUINN.

No. 27989.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1955.

*722Reynold M. Gardner, Amarillo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Potter County remanding appellant to the custody of the Sheriff for delivery to the agent of the State of Oklahoma.

The-warrant of the Governor of Texas was introduced in evidence and makes out a prima facie case authorizing his return.

Appellant, in asking for a reversal of this judgment, relies upon proof that he was incarcerated in the county jail of Beck-ham County, Oklahoma, under a complaint charging him with 'burglary at the time he was surrendered .to the Sheriff of Potter County, Texas, for transmittal to Texas to there answer a criminal charge and that such burglary charge in Oklahoma was not dismissed. His position is that since he was brought to Texas involuntarily he could not be a fugitive from justice in Oklahoma. He further contends that since the officials of Beckham County, Oklahoma, voluntarily surrendered the possession of appellant’s person to the Texas officers before they had' prosecuted him under the complaint there pending they should be estopped to ask for the appellant’s return.

We have concluded that appellant’s first contention is: answered by paragraph two of Section 5. of the Uniform-Criminal Extradition Act, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 1008a, § 5, which reads as follows:

> “The Governor of this State may also surrender on demand of the Executive Authority of any other state any person in this State who is charged in the manner provided in Section 23 of this Act with having violated the laws of the state whose Execúttve Authority is making the demand, even though such person left the demanding state involuntarily.” «

In the absence of a showing that the laws of" Oklahoma are différent from those of this State, it will be assumed that they are the same. Section -25B of the Uniform Act provides that nothing in the act shall be construed as a waiver of the right, pow.er or privilege of a State, to regain custody of. a demanded persqn for the purpose of trial. This section of the act disposes of appellant’s second contention.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# Europos Sąjungos L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0723 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | L 66 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Teisės aktai | 61 metai2018m. kovo 8d. |

ISSN 1977-0723

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

L 66

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Teisės aktai

61 metai2018m. kovo 8d.

---

| Turinys | | Klaidų ištaisymas | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | 2018 m. vasario 28 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2018/302 dėl nepagrįsto geografinio blokavimo ir kitų formų diskriminavimo dėl klientų pilietybės, gyvenamosios vietos arba įsisteigimo vietos vidaus rinkoje problemos sprendimo, kuriuo iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (EB) Nr. 2006/2004 ir (ES) 2017/2394 ir Direktyva 2009/22/EB, klaidų ištaisymas ( OL L 60 I, 2018 3 2 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Klaidų ištaisymas

Puslapis

*

2018 m. vasario 28 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2018/302 dėl nepagrįsto geografinio blokavimo ir kitų formų diskriminavimo dėl klientų pilietybės, gyvenamosios vietos arba įsisteigimo vietos vidaus rinkoje problemos sprendimo, kuriuo iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (EB) Nr. 2006/2004 ir (ES) 2017/2394 ir Direktyva 2009/22/EB, klaidų ištaisymas ( OL L 60 I, 2018 3 2 )

( OL L 60 I, 2018 3 2 )

1

| LT | Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.
  Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė. |
| --- | --- |

LT

Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.

Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė.

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 2018 3 8 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2018 3 8

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

L 66/1

---

2018 m. vasario 28 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2018/302 dėl nepagrįsto geografinio blokavimo ir kitų formų diskriminavimo dėl klientų pilietybės, gyvenamosios vietos arba įsisteigimo vietos vidaus rinkoje problemos sprendimo, kuriuo iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (EB) Nr. 2006/2004 ir (ES) 2017/2394 ir Direktyva 2009/22/EB, klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys L 60 I, 2018 m. kovo 2 d.
  )

14 puslapis, baigiamoji formuluotė:

yra:

„
  Europos Parlamento vardu

Pirmininkė

L. PAVLOVA

Tarybos vardu

Pirmininkas

A. TAJANI
  “,

turi būti:

„
  Europos Parlamento vardu

Pirmininkas

A. TAJANI

Tarybos vardu

Pirmininkė

L. PAVLOVA
  “.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         667,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,324,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,050,600
<PP&E>                                       1,478,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,925,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,851,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,700
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,603,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,925,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,031,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             457,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,029,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,029,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,029,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
10/2'6/20 n 15:35 FAX 2024935142 FAA - DMS 21001/00 3 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

Nouveau Laboratories, LLC, 

d^/a Covorniark USA 

Respondent. 

: 20;^ 

HEARir^G DOCKET 

FAA Docket No. [Unassigned] 

Judge [Unassigned] 

FDMS No. [Unassigned] >^ 

FAA Case No. 201OSO70031S ^ 

Qbii-iao 

( 

•zr 

'0 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO DERM ALLEGATIONS ADMITTED AND 

MOTION FOR HEARING ON SANCTION ONLY 

-o ^—••(-—i_ j 

Coraplamant, by and through the undersigned attorney, pursuant to Sections 

13.218 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 C.F.R. §13.218) 

hereby moves the Administrative Law Judge (AL!) to determine that due to the 

Complainant's admissio n of paragraph 1-19 of the Complaint in Respondent's 

"Motion For Deci.iion Or. In the Alternative. Answer" (and the affidavits and exhibits 

attached to it), tliat the factual allegations in the Complaint have been admitted. 

Complainant moves the ALI to find that, if a hearing is necessary in this matter, the as 

yet unscheduled hearing will only be for the purpose of determining the sanction to be 

imposed. 
10/26/201 1 15:35 FAX 2024935ld 2 FAA - OMS 3002/003 

WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully moves the Administrative f .aw Judge to: (1) 

find th^t factual allegations in the complaint have been admitted, (2) if a hearing is still 

deemed necessary, order that it should be only for the purpose of determining the amount 

of the Sanction to be imposed in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted this Z/T^a J ^ ^ v of June, 2011. 

GERALD A. ELLIS 

Attomfty 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
10/26/2011 15 35 FAX 2024935142 FAA - OMS [2003/003 

CERTIFICATE OF SER\TCE 

1 hereby certif>' that a copy of the foregoing Coinplainant-s Motion To Deem 

Allegations Admitted And Motion For Hearing On Sanction Only Motion ha^ been 

mailed this date by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to the following: 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

AGC-430 , Suile2Wl0O0 

Wilbur Wright Building 

SOO Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Keith Roberts 

Roberts Proprietaries, Inc. 

180 West 80"^^ St. 

New York, NY 10024 

(original) 

(1 copy) 

Lc^aVAssislant 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

JUN 2 7 2011 

Dated
Exhibit










March 12, 2019


Multi Solutions II, Inc.
4400 Biscayne Boulevard; 10th Floor
Miami, FL 33137


Re:    Amendment No. 7 to Revolving Credit Promissory Note


Reference is made to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note (the “Revolver”) dated April 23, 2012 in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to increase the Commitment Amount, as defined in the Revolver, from $450,000 to $500,000 and extend the Maturity Date of the Revolver to December 31, 2020 from December 31, 2019.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 7 to the Revolving Credit Promissory Note to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first written above.


BORROWER:


MULTI SOLUTIONS II, INC., a Florida Corporation




By:      /s/ Robert M. Lundgren    
Name:    Robert M. Lundgren
Director


LENDER:


VECTOR GROUP LTD., a Delaware Corporation




By:      /s/ Marc N. Bell        
Name:    Marc N. Bell
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

Jim Karas 

Director, Engineering Division 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 28, 2015 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District 

939 Ellis Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

RE: Request for Extension of Comment Period for EPA-R09-0AR-2015-0280 

Dear Mr. Karas: 

This letter is in response to your letter dated September 21, 2015. Your letter requests an 

extension of the comment period for our proposed action regarding Regulation 2, Rules 1 and 2 

for the Bay Area Air Quality Management District portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan. You have requested that EPA extend the comment period for an additional 

45 days to have sufficient time to review and analyze the Federal Register Notice (80 FR 52236) 

and to develop and finalize your comments. We are granting your request for an extension of the 

public comment period for an additional 45 days, until November 12, 2015. 

If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 415-972-3974. 

Sincerely, 

Gerardo 

~ C. Rios, Chief 

Permits Office 

Air Division 

cc: Alexander Crockett, Bay Area Air Quality Management District 

Pamela Leong, Bay Area Air Quality Management District
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

s0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

141063

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141063 COA: 284159 Macomb CC: 2 006-004764-FH GLORIA RENEE CURRIE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ENERAI. OF TX-EXAS

June 25, 1962

Honorable R. E. Swift County Attorney Anderson County Palestine,Texas Opinion No. ~~-1360 Re: Whether Article 6228a-5, Vernon's Civil Statutes, (SenateBill 17, Acts 1962, 57th Leg., 3rd Called Session,p. 60, ch. 22, Sec. 1) applies to a County School Superintendentof Public InBear Mr. Swift: structions.

In your recent letteryou request our opinion upon whether Article 6z?8a-5,Vernon's Civil Statutes Senate Bill 17, Acts 1962, 57th Leg., 3rd Called Session,p. A0, ch. 22 Sec. 1) applies to a County School Superintendentof Public Instructions. Article 6228a-5,which is SenateBill 17, Acts 1962, 57th Leg., 3rd Called Session,p. 60, ch. 22, Sec. 1, reads as follows: "LocalBoards of Education of the Public

Schools of this state and the GoverningBoards of the State-supportedinstitutionsof higher education are hereby authorized to enter into agreementswith their employees for the purchase of annuities for their employees as authorized In Section &03(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended." The question then becomeswhether the County Superintendent of Public Instructions is an employee of a local Board of Education of the Public Schools of this state.

This office, in OpinionWW-1051 (1951),held that a County School Superintendent Is in fact an officer of the State. The Court, in Webb Countyv. Board of School Trustees, 95 Tex. 131, 65 S.W. 878 (19011, stated:HonorableR. E. Swift,page 2. (ww-1360)

"Though in a sense a county officer, and though called 'CountySuperintendent,'he is In fact the officer and agent of the State." Therefore,you are advised that Article 62&a-5 does not apply to the County School Superintendent,as he Is a state officer and not an employee of the Local Board of Education of Public Schools.

SUMMARY Article 6228a-5 does not apply to County Superintendentof Public Instructionsas he Is a state officer and not an employee of the Local Board of Eduoatlon of Public Schools of Texas. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

JHH:mkh:zt 

# By John Ii.Hofmann Assistant

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Qeppert, Chairman Marvin Thomas Harry Hewell Grady Chandler FG3VIEWED

FOR THE ATTORNEY CtENERAL BY: Leonard Pasamore
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Ruth Chandler WILLIAMSON, Respondent, and seven companion causes.

No. 8263.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 26, 1937.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

A. Calder Mackay, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, and upon authority of companion cause of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Marian Chandler, 89 F.(2d) 332, ordered judgment of affirmance filed and entered in each of above cause, and that mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1303V

UNPUBLISHED

BRIAN KORPACZ,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 9, 2022

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On April 30, 2021, Brian Korpacz filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2

Petitioner alleged that he suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus 

vaccinations in “June, July, and October 2014.” ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On December 27, 2021, Petitioner timely filed a notice to 

withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.1

The Coast Distribution System, Inc.

Annual
Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2009,

as Amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit,
fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 30, 2010



/s/ JAMES MUSBACHJames MusbachPresident and Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and will be retained by The Coast Distribution
System, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Clifford E. STRADER v. STATE.

No. 26540.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

We.sley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form, executed iby appellant, requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John H. Curtis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                       
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: February 13, 2004 |  | /s/    John H. Curtis                 
|                         |  | John H. Curtis Chief Executive Officer
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL