alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1642

___________ Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Warden Brian Jett, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 29, 2011 Filed: July 5, 2011

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review, we conclude that Akbar was not en titled to habeas relief for the reasons relied upon by the district court. See Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is

1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, then United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now United States District Judge.affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Akbar’s motion for release and motion to expedite.

______________________________

-2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 479 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 480 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 481 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court[ 479 MAL 2023, 480 MAL 2023, 481 MAL 2023 and 482 MAL 2023 ]

- 2

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 482 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Kandi Technologies, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) on the date hereof, we, Hu Xiaoming, President and Chief Executive Officer and Zhu Xiaoying, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Hu XiaomingHu XiaomingPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ Zhu XiaoyingZhu XiaoyingChief Financial Officer





June 8, 2011
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1857 

For the relief of Bartosz Kumor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2011 

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Bartosz Kumor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BARTOSZ 

4 KUMOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Bartosz Kumor shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1857 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Bartosz Kumor 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Bartosz Kumor, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1857 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Bartosz Kumor shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (“Deep Down”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, Gay Eugene L. Butler, Executive Chairman &Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep Down.





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:       May 18, 2011





/s/ EUGENE L. BUTLER


Eugene L. Butler


Executive Chairman & Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
Opinion issued July 29, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00542-CV

———————————

WILLIAM K. ANDERSON, JR., Appellant

V.

MARJORIE DODD ANDERSON AND MARTIN SEIDLER, AS 

RECEIVER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 216th District Court

Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 11-446

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, William K. Anderson, Jr., has filed an unopposed motion to 

dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.





Dated:
March 12, 2010





BY:
                  /s/ Colin DunnColin
      Dunn, Vice President -Finance
      and Secretary
Exhibit 12



   PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                       TOTAL ENTERPRISE

      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                    Millions of Dollars
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Three Months Ended March 31
                                                1999                   1998
                                                ---------------------------
                                                        (Unaudited)
  Earnings Available for Fixed Charges
    Income before income taxes                  $ 99                    452
    Distributions in excess of (less than)
      equity in earnings of less-than-
      fifty-percent-owned companies               (6)                     2
    Fixed charges, excluding capitalized
      interest*                                  100                     77
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                $193                    531
  =========================================================================

  Fixed Charges
    Interest and expense on indebtedness,
      excluding capitalized interest            $ 71                     51
    Capitalized interest                           9                     13
    Preferred dividend requirements of
      capital trusts                              13                     13
    One-third of rental expense, net of
      subleasing income, for operating leases     11                     10
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                $104                     87
  =========================================================================
  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             1.9                    6.1
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *Includes amortization of capitalized interest totaling approximately
   $5 million and $4 million in 1999 and 1998, respectively.


  Earnings available for fixed charges include, if any, the company's
  equity in losses of companies owned less than 50 percent and having debt
  for which the company is contingently liable.  Fixed charges include the
  company's proportionate share, if any, of interest relating to the
  contingent debt.

  In 1990 and 1988, respectively, the company guaranteed a $400 million
  bank loan and $250 million of notes payable for the Long-Term Stock
  Savings Plan (LTSSP), an employee benefit plan.  In 1994, the notes
  payable were refinanced with a $131 million term loan, which was repaid
  in June 1998.  The $400 million loan was amended in 1994, 1995, and again
  in 1997.  Consolidated interest expense included a minimal amount of
  interest related to LTSSP borrowings in both the first quarter of 1999
  and 1998.


  <PAGE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 0611 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 8083

________________ 

### Aliner J. Harris , Appellant,

vs. 

### HGA - Land Holdings, LLC , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Oscar Rodriguez

- Fonts , Judge. Aliner J. Harris, in proper person. Tepps Treco and William A. Treco (Plantation) , for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM. Upon our de novo review, we affirm the trial court ’ s entry of final2 summary judgment quieting title and partition ing property pursuant to section s 733.105 (3) , 64.0 51 , and 64.071 , Florida Statutes (2021)

. The partial record before us lacks a transcript of the hearing and does not reflect the filing of any response or affidavit in opposition to the summary judgment motio n below. “It is the responsibility of the appellant to ensure that a record adequate to permit resolution of the issues raised on appeal is prepared and transmitted to the appellate court.” Morgan v. Pake , 611 So. 2d 1315, 1316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(e)); see Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (explaining that “[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error,” so “the lack of a trial transcript or a proper substitute” results in record that is “inadequate to demonstrate reversible error” and requires affirmance) ; Butler v. Metro politan Dade C ou nty , 298 So. 2d 552, 552

- 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) (a ffirming final summary judgment because material portions of record upon which trial court based its findings w ere omitted on appeal) ; see also Kidwell v. Kidwell , 181 So. 3d 1190 , 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ( “Notwithstanding the fundamental principle of allowing pro se litigants procedural latitude, a practice effected to ensure access to the courts for all citizens, pro se litigants are not immune from the rules of3 procedure.” (quoting Barrett v. City of Marg ate , 743 So.2d 1160, 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ) )

. Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.4
 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
 I, Gustavo Garavaglia, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.; and
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 Date:April 28, 2020/s/ Gustavo GaravagliaGustavo GaravagliaChief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 1
Exhibit 10.2


 


SECURED
TERM PROMISSORY NOTE


	$800,000	Advance
    Date:         March 28, 2019
	 	 
	 	Maturity
    Date:  September 30, 2019


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Ondas Holdings Inc., a Nevada corporation, for itself and each of its Subsidiaries (the “Borrower”)
hereby promises to pay to the order of Energy Capital, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, or the holder of this Note (the
“Lender”) at Lender's address listed in Loan Agreement, or such other place of payment as the holder of this Secured
Term Promissory Note (this “Promissory Note”) may specify from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United
States of America, the principal amount of Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000) or such lesser principal amount as Lender
has advanced to Borrower, together with interest as set forth in that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated October 1, 2018,
by and among Borrower, its Domestic Subsidiaries party thereto and Lender (as the same may from time to time be amended, modified
or supplemented in accordance with its terms, the “Loan Agreement”).


This
Promissory Note is the Term Note referred to in, and is executed and delivered in connection with, the Loan Agreement, and is
entitled to the benefit and security of the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents (as defined in the Loan Agreement), to
which reference is made for a statement of all of the terms and conditions thereof. All payments shall be made in accordance with
the Loan Agreement. All terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same definitions when used herein, unless otherwise
defined herein. An Event of Default under the Loan Agreement shall constitute an Event of Default under this Promissory Note.


Borrower
waives presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest under the UCC or any applicable law.
Borrower agrees to make all payments under this Promissory Note without setoff, recoupment or deduction and regardless of any
counterclaim or defense. This Promissory Note has been negotiated and delivered to Lender and is payable in the State of Florida.
This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, excluding
any conflicts of law rules or principles that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


BORROWER
FOR ITSELF AND ON BEHALF OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES: 


	 	ONDAS HOLDINGS INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Eric
    A. Brock
	 	 	Eric A. Brock, Chief Executive Officer
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 11, 2008

Mr. Ty Alan Bailey

Stinnett Thiebaud & Remington L.L.P.

1445 Ross Ave., Suite 4800

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. James Craig Orr Jr.

Heygood, Orr, Reyes & Bartolomei

2331 W. Northwest Highway, 2nd Floor

Dallas, TX 75220

RE:Case Number:  07-0368

Court of Appeals Number:  10-06-00372-CV

Trial Court Number:  42164

Style:HILL REGIONAL HOSPITAL

v.

MAXINE RUNNELS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR TO AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF GLENDON RUNNELS, DECEASED AND TAMMY RUNNELS WALKER AND GLEN PAUL RUNNELS, INDIVIDUALLY

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0368Page 1**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KHOI D. NGUYEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CR-02-283; CA-05-244) Submitted: December 15, 2005 De cided: December 21, 2005 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Khoi D. Nguyen, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis V. Gomez, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Khoi D. Nguyen, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), as untimely filed. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nguyen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 28, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 192 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-194, CP2024-200.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-04135 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
SCWC-17-0000145

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

GILBERT V. MALABE and DAISY D. MALABE, 

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF EXECUTIVE CENTRE,

by and through its Board of Directors,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000145; CIVIL NO. 16-1-2256)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants Gilbert V. Malabe 

and Daisy D. Malabe’s application for writ of certiorari filed 

on March 29, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 9, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000145

09-MAY-2019

08:06 AM
#### Jimmie Sonia BOBBITT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27499.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon -Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.-

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary, with a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, 12 years in , the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.