alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 13, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be held Wednesday, March 13, 2024, at 11 a.m. eastern time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda includes a committee discussion involving new and old issues and starting a new TAP year.                

Dated: February 21, 2024.

Shawn Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2024-03999 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1





AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of April 11, 2019 between ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., a North Carolina corporation (the “Company”) with its principal place of business in Charlotte, North Carolina, and STEPHEN E. MACADAM (“Executive”) to amend the Management Continuity Agreement dated as of April 14, 2008 between the Company and Executive (the “Agreement”).  Terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


RECITALS
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company desire to amend the Agreement to delete the provision thereof providing for additional payments to Executive thereunder with respect to any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the payment to Executive of $1.00, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    Amendment of Agreement.  The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 9 thereof in its entirety.


2.    Choice of Law. This Amendment is to be governed by the substantive law of the State of North Carolina without regard to the conflict-of-laws principles thereof.


3.    Remainder Unchanged. The provisions of the Agreement unchanged by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 


4.    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which is to be deemed to be an original and both of which taken together are to constitute one and the same agreement.  Facsimile execution and delivery of this Amendment by either party shall constitute a legal, valid and binding execution and delivery of this Amendment.











The parties are signing this Amendment as of the date set forth on the first page of this Amendment.


ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. 


	
			
	By:
	/s/ J. Milton Childress II

	 
	J. Milton Childress II

	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief

	 
	Financial Officer

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Robert S. McLean

	 
	Robert S. McLean

	 
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel

	 
	and Secretary

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Stephen E. Macadam

	STEPHEN E. MACADAM
















2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1989 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1989

  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2011

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Arizona Public Lands 
Protection Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LANDS AND INTERESTS LOCATED IN PIMA AND 
              SANTA CRUZ COUNTIES, ARIZONA.

    Subject to valid existing rights, after the date of enactment of 
this Act--
            (1) all federally owned interests in National Forest lands 
        in Santa Cruz County and Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn 
        from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws;
            (2) all federally owned subsurface interests under the 
        administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in 
        lands in Pima County, Arizona, with respect to which the 
        surface interests are owned by such county, including in such 
        lands located in Davidson Canyon, are withdrawn from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws; and
            (3) all federally owned interests in Bureau of Land 
        Management lands in Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn from 
        entry, location, or patent under the general mining laws.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2049

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses to $10,500 and to index such limitation to inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2011

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on capital losses to $10,500 and to index such limitation to inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON CAPITAL LOSSES OF INDIVIDUALS INCREASED TO 
              $10,500.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 1211(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on capital losses) is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(1)(A) in the case of married individual filing a 
        separate return, 50 percent of the amount in effect under 
        subparagraph (B) for the taxable year, or
            ``(B) $10,500 in any other case, or''.
    (b) Cost-of-Living Increase.--Section 1211 of such Code is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Cost-of-Living Increase.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning in a calendar year after calendar year 2011, the 
        $10,500 amount under subsection (b)(1)(B) shall be increased by 
        an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2010' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.
            ``(2) Rounding.--If any amount after adjustment under 
        paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall be 
        rounded to the next higher multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

Certification Of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of First Capital Institutional Real
Estate, Ltd.-1--(the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of Donald Liebentritt, as President and Chief
Executive Officer of First Capital Financial, L.L.C., the Managing General
Partner of the Partnership (the "Managing General Partner"), and Philip
Tinkler, as Vice President--Finance and Treasurer of the Managing General
Partner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
   Partnership.

/s/  Donald Liebentritt
-------------------------
Donald Liebentritt
President and Chief
Executive Officer
March 28, 2003

/s/  Philip Tinkler
-------------------------
Philip Tinkler
Vice President--Finance
and Treasurer
March 28, 2003
#### Clara Mae WEST, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28052.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

No appearance- for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

■ PER CURIAM.

This is a conviction for a violation of the Liquor Control Act, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666-1 et seq. with punishment assessed at a fine'of $350.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Clean Power Plants/Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources and Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: EGUs Denver, CO July 29, 2014 Press Sign-in Sheet
Name Affiliation Contact Information 

## Ga: ,a-rAi-,c,,_ck

. 

# ro co c-

__ ; \(2_ [111 k i, il k ei (iadf 

## we/in

v ., I i r r 

## o r , v k ci,i...... bidok r51 teal/K(4w( ikkfA) I 61ttAvint&A91-ii,dir

l eytie?

40 0-1



## .. . -- - -
k(L tikic. - 

# 5 41 4 .-.< S

— 72;1--\ i‘:,`

. \ °Z

. 

# A- ` 71-2 \ t VeX
- )z•s-g
- .› c v.),A,
-- -\ 14. - NJ 

# ik? Cie ( PI (1). 0 

# tr e -;--\ -"-- I
I )6, IA 

## — 1, l'' 011



# I

### 01' FcthtaCk<lgo ktm M taVclair 131' 

## Ee rile 1 

## >irte(OiNd

- 

## r

ct () A4h

. c ad 

## co 

## - CON' kiktit' r--4 k-t-ii. NEWS


## ,

r
-- evtviatl L:04.SLe Ci 

### 7 6 \--- 

# RA0 c 

# y i /__-(vc - 6tvtc.liek A p .

1,..,



### — ?ci-ct
. 

### kic.rtAi NrcAnc o Occci ■

e_.I X • . 

### , 

## a vraA hioki

V .- • ■

. • 

## _ lassa 

# Niklf

. Kccc-i f0 , 4 

# in r



# fikp ( inL i

p? - e :7,

r efifr meic,3 C -$ coLoio

, A. Pz-I L ( (

2 0.4tio p lY\AAt t- .6 1 

# 2 cce,u,(_clbot.4. oL(4 / " Ft

(--- (r.4,{A(2.&Abuu

r- r‘ollus+ 8 2-3

) 3 1 0- itil 

## a -\ )
-- 0) ic ,/ pC& , r H 56 (40]
'A A a , ■ ( '- eiv\ ak. !\ e- ;til .1 kc) Cv st, 7 f

i l , •1 14 --tic.14- I / t ( , j Pfrl.g1 hacks 

### eruki-c:'.Clean Power Plants/Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources and Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: EGUs Denver, CO July 29, 2014 Press Sign-in Sheet

. Name Affiliation , Contact Information, C'`jj
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00126-CR

GAVIN DANIAR SNOW,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14,898

ORDER O N R E H E A R I N G

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed January 2, 2019

Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALPHONSO EUGENE ALSTON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-93-241, CA-97-528-2) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonso Eugene Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent that Alston challenges his status as a career offender, we have previously upheld such status on direct appeal. See United States v. Alston, No. 94-5448 (4th Cir. June 2, 1995) (unpublished). Hence, further argument on this issue is foreclosed under the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Bell , 5 F.3d 64, 66 (4th Cir. 1993). 2 PER CURIAM: Alphonso E. Alston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * See Alston v. United States , Nos. CR-93-241; CA-97- 528-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 131210 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, DALE BRADSHAW, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131210 COA: 258764 Manistee CC: 04-011537-NH WEST SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellant,

and

MUNSON HEALTH CARE, d/b/a MUNSON HOME HEALTH, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN , J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to app eal for the reasons stated in my dissent from the denial of leave to appeal in Sturgis Bank & Trust Co v H illsdale Community Health Ctr , 268 Mich App 484 (2005). See 479 Mich 854 (2007).

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2007

Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00396

- CV

CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. d/b/a Express Homes,

Appellant

v.

Giancarlo PEREZ and Krystle Perez,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- CI

- 10075

Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RIOS

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s September 10, 2021

Order Denying the Defendant’s M otion to Compel Arbitration is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are

taxed against Appellant Continental Homes of Texas, L.P. d/b/a Express Homes.

SIGNED October 19, 2022.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
#### JOHN DENICOLA, JR. *v.*STOP AND SHOP COMPANIES, INC.

(14017)

Dupont, C. X, and Lavery and Herman, Js.

Argued December 14, 1995

decision released January 30, 1996

*Robert S. Bystrowski,*with whom, on the brief, was *Andrew H. Sharp,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Richard Jacobs,*with whom, on the brief, was *Steven D. Jacobs,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the workers’ compensation review board is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John H. Curtis, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986]

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated: May 14, 2004 |  | /s/ John H. Curtis                    
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                    |  | John H. Curtis
Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00074-CV

Stacey SCOTT,

Appellant

v.

Larry FURROW and Keller Williams Legacy Group,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-1125-CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ second motion for extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### James H. KNOX v. STATE.

No. 27511.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 2, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

It is made to appear, by proper affidavit, that since the appeal of this case the appellant has died.

The appeal is therefore abated.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc. pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C.
63.

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Executive Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

Date:  May 23, 2005


/s/ Edward Alexander
Edward Alexander
Chief Executive Officer of
Proton Laboratories, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Proton
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Proton Laboratories, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Entire first page is confidential]
Detail of NCS components by GPC

PEAK AREA, %

NO. TIME (MIN) OF TOTAL COMPONENT

1 15.7 0.416 TETRAMER OF 115254-47-2 

2 15.9 1.575 TRIMER OF 115254-47-2

3 16.3 11.3 180063-56-3(NCS 2)

4 17.1 86.7 115254-47-2 (NCS 1)