alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Global Assets
& Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 20, 2004


/s/ Bertram Cutler
-----------------------
Bertram Cutler,
President, CEO, & CFO
cool_ex1094.htm

EXHIBIT 10.94
  
 AMENDMENT
 TO THE $110,000 PROMISSORY NOTE DATED May 22, 2018
  
 The parties agree that $110,000 Promissory Note by and between Cool Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) and Lucas Hoppel (“Holder”) is hereby amended as follows:
  
 Maturity Date: The Maturity Date shall be extended to February 28th, 2019.
  
 Conversion Price: The Conversion Price in section 3(a)(ii) shall permanently be changed to equal $0.025 cents.
  
 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE $110,000 PROMISSORY NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
  
 Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated December 3rd, 2018 by signing below:
  
  	 /s/ Tim Hassett
	 	 /s/ Lucas Hoppel 

	 Tim Hassett 
	 	 Lucas Hoppel

	 Cool Technologies, Inc. 
	 	
	 Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 43 (Monday, March 4, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03987]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CG Docket No. 17-59; WC Docket No. 17-97; FCC 23-18; FCC 23-37; FR ID 
204126]


Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, Call 
Authentication Trust Anchor; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective and compliance dates; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register of January 25, 2024, announcing the effective 
dates of amendments to its non-internet Protocol call authentication 
and robocall mitigation database rules. The document contained an 
incorrect Federal Register citation and an incorrect compliance date.

DATES: This correction is effective March 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Beith, Competition Policy 
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-0756, or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f1a0d1614511d1a160b173f191c1c51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711403181a5f1314180519311712125f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the document published January 25, 2024, 
at 89 FR 4833, announcing the effective dates of amendments to its non-
internet Protocol call authentication and robocall mitigation database 
rules, an incorrect Federal Register citation and an incorrect 
compliance date appeared in DATES. The Federal Register citation for 
the publication of the amendments to 47 CFR 64.6303(c) (amendatory 
instruction 9) and 47 CFR 64.6305(d), (e), (f), and (g) (amendatory 
instruction 12) is corrected to 88 FR 40096. The compliance date for 
the regulations at 47 CFR 4.6305(g) is corrected to May 28, 2024.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 25, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-01167, 
on page 4833, in the first column, correct the DATES caption to read: 
``The amendments to 47 CFR 64.6303(c) (amendatory instruction 9) and 47 
CFR 64.6305(d), (e), (f), and (g) (amendatory instruction 12), 
published at 88 FR 40096, June 21, 2023, and the amendments to 47 CFR 
64.6305(d)(2)(ii) and (iii), (e)(2)(ii), and (f)(2)(iii) (amendatory 
instruction 5), published at 88 FR 43446, July 10, 2023, are effective 
February 26, 2024. The compliance date for 47 CFR 64.6305(g) is May 28, 
2024.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-03987 Filed 3-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth C. Wiedrich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.  Date: July 16, 2007/s/ Kenneth C. Wiedrich
Kenneth C. Wiedrich
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Clifford L. Neuman______ Clifford L. Neuman President October 10, 2008  __/s/ Todd Huss____________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer October 10, 2008
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
                                              PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                              PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
                                              300 Madison Avenue
                                              New York NY 10017
                                              Telephone (646) 471 3000
                                              Facsimile (813) 286 6000


                   Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of Chase Home Finance LLC:

We have examined management's assertion about Chase Home Finance LLC's (the
"Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is fairly stated,in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.
PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.

March 13, 2006





















Exhibit I


              Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                 with USAF Minimum Servicing Standards


March 13, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Chase Home Finance LLC (the
"Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").
These Standards are applicable only to the Company's prime and subprime
mortgage portfolios.

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policies in the amounts of $250,000,000 and $25,000,000
respectively.




/s/ Kim Greaves                             /s/ Jim Miller
-----------------                           ---------------
Kim Greaves                                    Jim Miller
Vice President                                 Vice President
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.                      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.


/s/ Scott Powell
------------------
Scott Powell
Senior Vice President
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                              /s/ Linda L. Perry
Date: May 11, 2005            ________________________________________________
                              Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1456

PATRICK G. DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY; AUSTIN HOMES;

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY; DAVIDSON UNITED

METHODIST CHURCH,

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (MISC-99-4-3-V)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Patrick G. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Carol Ann

Barthel, Lawrence P. Blaskopf, Christopher J. Kayser, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Patrick G. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying

the Petitioner’s petition to quash summons and motion to quashattest. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Davis v. United States, No. MISC-99-4-3-V

(W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
p. 1 

### RECEIVE D 

## OPPT cm 20IUANI 6 P

M 12:3 6
367 6 Davi s Roa

d N.W
. • Dover , Ohi o 4462 2 • (330)343-771 1 • 1-800-321-880 5 • Fax : <330

) 364-962 6 CBI C Contro l Numbe r Januar y 8 , 201 4 35783 2 Documen t Control Offic e (DCO) (7407M) Offic e o f Pollution Preventio

n an dToxic s (OPPT

) Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y 120 0 Pennsylvani

aAvenue , N

W Washington , D

C 2046 0 ATTN : TSC

A Sectio n 4 4 0 CF R799.5089 ; Docke t I D Numbe

r EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-011 2 Dove r Chemica l Stud y Pla n fo r CAS #72162-15- 3 T o who mi t ma y concern : Dove r Chemica l Corporatio

n i s requestin

g a n extensio n fo r th e tes t completio n o f severa l studies o n (CAS #72162-15-3 ) base

d o n th e EPA' s HPV

3 TES T PLAN AN D DAT A ADEQUAC Y REVIE

W (Contrac

t No
. EP-W-09-027 ) an

ddifficultie s i n findin g analytica l methods
. W e reques t th e followin g extensions : Chroni c Toxicit y t o Daphni a Fo r Chroni c Toxicit y t o Daphnia , w e reques t a n extensio n t o th e en do f Marc h 2014
. Th

e in-lif e portion o f

th e chroni c daphni astud y i s complet

e wit h dat abein g compiled
. Dove

r experience

d delays i n thi s projec

t du e t o personne

l change s a t th e tes t laborator y plu s challenge s i n findin g a

n analytica

l metho dfo r th e assa y o f tes t compoun di n th e aqueou s tes t media
. Reproductiv

e Toxicit y Developmenta

l Toxicit y Fo r th e Combine

d Repea t Dos e Toxicit y wit h Reproduction/Developmenta l Tox Screening , w e reques t a n extensio n t o th e en do f Februar y 2014
. Th

e delays fo r

completio n o f th e stud y wer e primarily du

e t o difficultie s i n findin g a

n analytica

l metho dfo r dosin g solutio n assays . Th e physical/chemica

l testin g wa s complete dan dsubmitte di n Septembe

r 201 3 an dth e biodegradatio

n stud y i s bein g finalized
. Shoul dyo u hav e an y questions , pleas

e contac t me . 

# DOV E H7

1 Chemica l r- J Corporatio np . 2 

# DOV E Chemica l

Corporatio n A SubaMM Y o f IC C kiduttrtMhw
. 3676 Davi s Roa

d N.W. - Dover , Ohi o 4462 2 • (330)343-771 1 • 1-800-321-880 5 • Fax:(330)364-962 6
Sincerely ,

Ti mNowick

i Manage r Produc t Complianc

e Dove r Chemica l Corporatio

n 330-365-361 0 tnowicki@,doverchem.cor

n

I I
From: Lee, Arthur To: Heggs, Angela Subject: FW: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords Date: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:29:30 AM

-----Original Message----- From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [ mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil ] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 2:38 PM To: Lee, Arthur Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords Mr. Lee, Thank you for your response. This answers my question perfectly and resolves the interpretation issue on our end. Have a great day!
Shane Nash Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC. Air Force Safety Center Kirtland AFB, NM DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827
-----Original Message----- From: Lee, Arthur [ mailto:ALee@cpsc.gov ] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:33 PM To: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords
Mr. Nash The proposed rule requires extension cords within the scope of the rule to meet all applicable safety characteristics outlined in the proposed rule. The absence of any one of the characteristics would make the product a substantial product hazard. See 80 FR 5701. I hope this answers your question. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Arthur Lee US Consumer Product Safety Commission Directorate for Engineering Sciences Division of Electrical Engineering 5 Research Place Rockville, MD 20850 301 987-2008 alee@cpsc.gov

-----Original Message----- From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [ mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil ] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:30 PM To: Lee, Arthur Subject: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension CordsGood morning, sir! I am seeking clarification to the proposed rule. Is the proposal for extension cords to have ALL 4 of the readily observable characteristics or at least 1 characteristic? Your help in clearing this up is greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Shane Nash Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC. Air Force Safety Center Kirtland AFB, NM DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827

*****!!! Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail (and any attachments) are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.

Copies of product recall and product safety information can be sent to you automatically via Internet e-mail, as they are released by CPSC. To subscribe or unsubscribe to this service go to the following web page: http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Newsroom/Subscribe
*****!!!
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (“Deep Down”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, Ronald E. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deep Down, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep Down.





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:       March 8, 2011


/s/ RONALD E. SMITH


Ronald E. Smith


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Willie (Bill) PIGG, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 2, 1955.

W. A. Johnson, Paintsville, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Willie (Bill) Pigg appeals from a judgment of the Johnson Circuit Court convicting him of possessing liquor for sale in dry territory and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 60 days.

The liquor was discovered by an income tax investigator of the Kentucky Department of Revenue, while in the process of searching Pigg’s home, with his consent, for evidence of income tax evasion, such as concealed assets. The ground asserted for reversal of the judgment is that there was no consent to a search for liquor and the search therefore was illegal and the evidence obtained by the search was inadmissible.

We think the search was legal and the evidence was admissible. Commonwealth v. Meiner, 196 Ky. 840, 245 S.W. 890; United States v. Charles, D.C., 8 F.2d 302; Milam v. United States, 265 U.S. 586, 44 S.Ct. 460, 68 L.Ed. 1192; Note, 169 A.L.R. 1419.

To the extent that it expresses a contrary view, Veal v. Commonwealth, 199 Ky. 634, 251 S.W. 648, is overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.