alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21
                                   Q-MED, INC.

                             A DELAWARE CORPORATION

                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES



Heart Map, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 83% owned.

Interactive Heart Management Corp., a Delaware corporation, 100% owned.

HeartMasters LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 50% owned indirectly.

QMedCare, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, 100% owned.

Health e Monitoring, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, 100% owned.

QMedCare Dakota, LLC, a South Dakota Corporation, 100% owned by QMedCare, Inc.

Lakeshore Captive Insurance Company, Inc., a South Carolina Corporation, 100%
owned by QMedCare, Inc.
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | By:    /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                                                                          |
|   |         Mark D. Fischer        Executive Vice President |
|   |                                                                                                                                    |

----

| Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit                                 |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1        | Press Release issued by PVH Corp. on February 2, 2016. |
#### Paul TURNER et al., Appellants, v. Norman SMITH, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 23, 1953.

W. E. Faulkner, C. A. Noble, Hazard, for appellants.

Don A. Ward, Hazard, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion by Paul Turner and Standard Accident Insurance Company for an appeal'" from the Perry Circuit Court of a judgment for $500 for assault and battery recovered by Norman Smith. See previous-appeal, Turner v. Smith, 313 Ky. 635, 232 S.W.2d 1006.

Considering the case on its merits, the Court finds no prejudicial error. The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the-judgment stands affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Subrah S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2002


/s/ Craig Klosterman
---------------------------
Craig Klosterman
Chief Financial Officer




This statement is submitted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be
deemed to be filed for the purpose of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
#### Frank E. BREWER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27185.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1954.

Maddin & Copeland, by Gene Maddin, Waco, for appellant on appeal only.

Tom Moore, Jr., Dist. Atty., Waco, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the possession of marijuana; the punishment, 8 years.

Ranger Rogers testified that on the night in question, he, in company with Officer Reed, was waiting on the highway south of Waco; that when an automobile containing two men passed they gave chase; that the chase continued for approximately five miles, and during that time a person on the right side of the automobile emptied the contents of a brown paper sack out the door. Rogers stated that when they brought the automobile to a halt the appellant was seated on the right side; that they found particles of marijuana in the automobile and then retraced their course and recovered the sack, which itself had finally been thrown clear of the automobile, and it also contained some marijuana.

Officer Reed testified that one Carr was driving the automobile which they chased that night; that he saw the appellant emptying something out of a paper sack while the chase progressed; that when they examined the automobile they found particles of marijuana which appeared to have blown back into it; and that the.y recovered the sack from the roadside, and it contained marijuana.

It was stipulated that the substance found in the automobile had been analyzed and was marijuana.

There ar.e* no bills of exception in the record.

We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RONNIE ANDERSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-96

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 18, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine 

Thomas, Judge.

Ronnie Kenneth Anderson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO****18
                U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS
                ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION
                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
      A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President
      and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of
      the
      Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











By:
                  /s/ David A. Gestetner
              
              President,
                  Chief Executive Officer and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
              
              June
                    22, 2006David
                  A. Gestetner
              
              (Principal
                  Executive Officer and Principal
                Financial
                  and Accounting Officer )
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1865 

To protect the right of individuals to bear arms at water resources development projects administered by the Secretary of the Army, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2011 

Mr. GIBBS (for himself, Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. GOHMERT, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, 

Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. LATTA, Mrs. MILLER of 

Michigan, Mr. AUSTRIA, and Mr. TIBERI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To protect the right of individuals to bear arms at water 

resources development projects administered by the Secretary of the Army, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recreational Lands 

5 Self-Defense Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1865 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM VIOLENT CRIME. 

2 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) The Second Amendment to the Constitution 

4 provides that ‘‘the right of the people to keep and 

5 bear Arms, shall not be infringed’’. 

6 (2) Section 327.13 of title 36, Code of Federal 

7 Regulations, provides that, except in special cir8 cumstances, ‘‘possession of loaded firearms, ammu9 nition, loaded projectile firing devices, bows and ar10 rows, crossbows, or other weapons is prohibited’’ at 

11 water resources development projects administered 

12 by the Secretary of the Army. 

13 (3) The regulations described in paragraph (2) 

14 prevent individuals complying with Federal and 

15 State laws from exercising the second amendment 

16 rights of the individuals while at such water re17 sources development projects. 

18 (4) The Federal laws should make it clear that 

19 the second amendment rights of an individual at a 

20 water resources development project should not be 

21 infringed. 

22 (b) PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF INDIVIDUALS TO

23 BEAR ARMS AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

24 PROJECTS.—The Secretary of the Army shall not promul25 gate or enforce any regulation that prohibits an individual 

26 from possessing a firearm including an assembled or funcVerDate Mar 15 2010 17:50 May 20, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1865.IH H1865

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1865 IH

1 tional firearm at a water resources development project 

2 covered under section 327.0 of title 36, Code of Federal 

3 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 

4 Act), if— 

5 (1) the individual is not otherwise prohibited by 

6 law from possessing the firearm; and 

7 (2) the possession of the firearm is in compli8 ance with the law of the State in which the water 

9 resources development project is located. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934

 

I, Ann D. Murtlow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (the"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8618 and 34-52492]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	April 16, 2007	
	/s/ Ann D. Murtlow	Ann D. MurtlowPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Addendum to AEO 2013 (provided by William Brown at EIA on 6/5/13)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Ethanol (billion gallons)

 Imports 0.015 0.171 0.508 0.830 0.719 0.742 0.871 0.894 1.032 1.060 1.314

 Cellulosic 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

 Non-cellulosic 0.015 0.171 0.508 0.830 0.719 0.742 0.871 0.894 1.032 1.060 1.314

 Exports 0.398 1.194 0.858 0.885 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.224

Delta -0.383 -1.023 -0.350 -0.055 0.719 0.742 0.871 0.894 1.032 1.060 1.090

in MMbbl.d -0.025 -0.067 -0.023 -0.004 0.047 0.048 0.057 0.058 0.067 0.069 0.071

Ethanol (million gallons)

 Imports 15 171 508 830 719 742 871 894 1,032 1,060 1,314

 Cellulosic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 Non-cellulosic 15 171 508 830 719 742 871 894 1,032 1,060 1,314

 Exports 398 1,194 858 885 0 0 0 0 0 0 224

Delta -383 -1,023 -350 -55 719 742 871 894 1,032 1,060 1,090
#### Gerald James WALTERS, Petitioner v. Dan E. FOWLER, Judge of Fayette Quarterly Court, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 17, 1955.

Thomas Underwood, Jr., Lexington, for appe]]ant

Charles Wylie, Lexington, for appellee,

MONTGOMERY, Judge,

Gerald James Walters seeks a writ of prohibition against Dan E. Fowler, Judge of the Fayette Quarterly Court. The petitioner was tried and convicted in the Fay-ette Quarterly Court upon a warrant charging breach of the peace. By this writ, he seeks to prevent the collection of a $5 fine and costs levied against him.

Petitioner and about 113 other people were arrested on May 20, 1955, while attending the Donagene Club located on the Richmond Road in Fayette County, Kentucky. He complains that many prejudicial errors were committed upon the trial. He also urges that he will suffer great and irreparable damage if such a conviction is upheld, and that the commission of the trial errors, collection of the fine, and refusal of a new trial are substantial failures of due process' under ‘the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1, and the Constitution of Kentucky, Section 11.

We do not find it necessary to detail the evidence bearing upon the guilt or innocence of the petitioner or to discuss specifically each of thé errors assigned. None of the errors complained of rendered the judgment void. We feel that the recent ruling in Thompson v. Wood, Ky., 277 S.W.2d 472, decided March 4, 1955, rehearing denied April 29, 1955, is- controlling. It was' there held that the imposition- and collection of a fine for $10 and the costs by a court of competent jurisdiction was not such great injustice or great and.irreparable injury as would justify the use of the *524writ of prohibition. It is conceded in the instant case that the inferior court was proceeding within its jurisdiction.

This result may seem harsh to the petitioner, and we are inclined to feel sympathetically toward him. However, the Legislature, in its wisdom, has not seen fit to authorize an appeal from a $5 fine. The proceeding used by petitioner is nothing more than an attempt to appeal from the judgment of an inferior court when no such appeal is authorized. The failure or refusal of the Legislature to provide for such an appeal is within its power and discretion. Lakes v. Goodloe, 195 Ky. 240, 242 S.W. 632.

For the reasons stated in Thompson v. Wood, supra, the writ of prohibition is denied.
#### Tommy Loyd HARWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28058.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*947PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of marijuana; the punishment, 9 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Billy Frank WILSHIRE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27326.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

*835No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was probated.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.
#### Santiago MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27702.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1955.

Noe Garza, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for murder, with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

This case is before us without a statement of facts.

A bill of exception-appearing in the record complains of the trial, court’s charge on self-defense.

Not having the facts before us, we are in no position to pass upon the question presented. For aught this court knows, the fafcts fully sustained and justified the charge, as given. The rulings, of a trial court are presumed to be correct until the contrary is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Tommy Loyd HARWELL v. STATE.

No. 28215.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, on a plea of guilty, seven years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             441
<SECURITIES>                                      2749
<RECEIVABLES>                                      775
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (410)
<INVENTORY>                                       3983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7679
<PP&E>                                            8604
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         99392
<OTHER-SE>                                        3000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8870
<SALES>                                           2677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3254
<CGS>                                             2440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>