alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George McCLELLAN, Appellant, v. Lucy McCLELLAN, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 17, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1955.

William G. Reed, Carrollton, for appellant.

John T. Fowler, Louisville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment directed in favor of appellee, Lucy McClellan, for $920 on a claim against appellant, George McClellan. We have read the record and the briefs and we conclude appellant was properly summoned in Jefferson County, so that the entry of the judgment under the circumstances was not error.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TODD SEAY, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 694 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of Defense[, and] the Attorney General

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and, as appropriate, the Attorney General, the authority to transmit to certain congressional committees the report required by section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (Public Law 118-31).

The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any provision of any future public law that is the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum.

                    The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2024-03754

Billing code 6001-FR-P
#### Andrew BROCKETTE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27821.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1955.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*944PER CURIAM.

The offense is unlawfully driving an automobile1 upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the punishment, a fine of $75 and confinement in jail for three days.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<NAME> Insight Midwest, L.P.
[LEGEND]
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Registrant Company
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for June 30, 2000 and Consolidated
Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the Six Months ended June 30, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,192
<PP&E>                                         770,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,679,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PARTNERS-CAPITAL>                             306,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,679,798
<SALES>                                        187,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,237
<CGS>                                           64,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (61,832)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (61,832)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,832)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting            Firm**

 

We            consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-128202 and            No. 333-134249 on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement No. 333-146121 on Form S-3 of            Parke Bancorp, Inc. of our report, dated March 24, 2008, relating to our audit of the            2007 consolidated financial statements of Parke Bancorp, Inc., appearing in the Annual            Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of            Parke Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

Blue            Bell, Pennsylvania

March            28, 2008

 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International            –

an            affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 2, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00754

- CV

Laszlo Herczeg , Appellant

v.

City of Austin , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on April 7, 2023

. Having reviewed

the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the C ourt

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Co urt and in the court below.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7595** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8:94

- cr - 00454

- PJM

- 2; 8:13

- cv - 01825

- PJM )

Submitted : December 17, 2013 Decided: December 20, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Bernard Gibson, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Chan Park, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard Gibson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his “Motion for Relief in the Interest of Justice Under S ection 2255(f)(3) of Title 28 (second

- in

time)” as a successive and unauthorized habeas motion , and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The order s

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sati sfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 ( 2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U .S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We3 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### DAWSON DAYLIGHT COAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. Ed F. BESHEAR et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 2, 1956.

Nichols & Nichols, Madisonville, for appellant.

Laurence T. Gordon, Madisonville, for appellees.

' MOREMEN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Dawson Daylight Coal Company from a judgment of the Hopkins Circuit Court dismissing its petition against the appellees filed pursuant to KRS 389.020, seeking sale of the minerals in a tract of land.

Appellant, Dawson Daylight Coal Company, owns a 3⁄492 interest of a one-half undivided interest in the minerals on a tract of land situate in Hopkins County. Appel-lees own jointly the remaining interest in the minerals and all the surface.

The question presented in this case is whether the owner of an undivided interest in the minerals under a tract of land may maintain an action under ICRS 389.020 for the sale of all the minerals and division of the proceeds against joint owners of the minerals who also own the surface in fee.

Both parties to this appeal cite and rely, to a certain extent, upon Ball v. Clark, 150 Ky. 383, 150 S.W. 359, and the rules of law affirmed and announced therein. In Tertel-ing Brothers, Incorporated v. Bennett, Ky., 287 S.W.2d 607, this court discussed at length the Ball case and some of the subsequent opinions which had relied upon it. It was recognized that in the Ball case the court had approved the rille that one co-tenant cannot, by conveying an interest in minerals to a stranger, create a new tenancy in common between his co-owner and the stranger to whom the minerals were conveyed. But the court pointed out in the Ball case, and in subsequent cases, the actual facts of the cases had inclined the court to a position in. protection of the surface owner’s rights. The court ruled (in the Terteling Brothers case) that the owner of the surface rights could maintain a suit for partition against a person who was co-owner of the mineral rights lying under that surface, but indicated that the co-tenant in the mineral estate would have no such fight if he sought to act against the will of the surface owner.

In the case at bar, a joint owner of the mineral tract seeks to sell property of a joint owner who also owns the surface rights. As we indicated in the Terteling Brothers case, this may not properly be done.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of QMed Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Jane A. Murray, President and and Principal Executive Officer of the Company and William T. Schmitt, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/  Jane A. Murray

Jane A. Murray

President and and Principal Executive Officer

February 9, 2007

 

 

/s/  William T. Schmitt, Jr.

William T. Schmitt, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

February 9, 2007

 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to QMed Inc. and will be retained by QMed Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] 

 

 

674642-2
Exhibit 99.7

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

   Reference is hereby made to BVMBS 2005-1 (the "Securitizations"). Washington
Mutual Bank, FA (the "Servicer") services mortgage loans in connection with the
  Securitization (the "Mortgage Loans") pursuant to the terms of that certain
 Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2004 between
Washington Mutual Bank, FA (the "Servicer") and Banc of America Mortgage Capital
  Corporation and Bank of America, National Association (as from time to time
 amended or replaced by a reconstituted servicing or other successor servicing
                     agreement, the "Servicing Agreement").

I, Henry J. Berens, an authorized officer of the Servicer, certify for the
benefit of the Master Servicer and the Trustee with respect to the calendar year
immediately preceding the date of this Officer's Certificate (the "Relevant
Year"), as follows:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year
          and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under
          my supervision;

     2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
          material respects throughout the Relevant Year;

DATED as of March 15, 2006.




                                        /s/ Henry J. Berens
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Henry J. Berens
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00377

- CR

RALPH DEWAYNE WATKIN S

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D36507

O R D E R

Appellant’s Objection to Motion to Extend Time, filed on July 13, 2017, is

overruled. Appellant’s Motion to Strike State’s Brief and Proceed to Submission, filed on

the same date, is denied. The State’s Second motion for extension of time to file its brief

is granted.

PER CURIAMWatkins v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Objection overruled

M otion de nied

Motion granted

Order issued and filed July 1 9 , 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,652
<SECURITIES>                                    14,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,061)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,403
<PP&E>                                          16,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,589)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,509
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,518
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,495
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,811
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,160)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 3

                              State of Delaware
                      Office of the Secretary of State            PAGE 1
                               --------------


     I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
BUSINESS TRUST REGISTRATION OF "DAIMLERCHRYSLER AUTO TRUST 2000-A", FILED IN
THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, A.D. 2000, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK
A.M.










                                        /s/ Edward J. Freel
                                        -----------------------------------
                      [ SEAL ]          Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State


3185305 8100                            AUTHENTICATION: 0288317
001101845                               DATE: 03-01-00







                            CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                     OF
                      DAIMLERCHRYSLER AUTO TRUST 2000-A

         THIS Certificate of Trust of DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2000-A (the
"Trust") is being duly executed and filed by Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, a
Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a business trust under the
Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del C ss 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

         1.   Name: The name of the business trust formed hereby is
DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2000-A.

         2.   Delaware Trustee: The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, 1201
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trustee
Administration Department.

         3.   Effective Date: This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.


                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE, not in
                                    its individual capacity but solely as
                                    trustee.


                                    By: /s/ Denis Kelly
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Name:    DENIS KELLY
                                    Title:   ASSISTANT VICE-PRESIDENT



                                                        STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                       SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                    DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                    FILED 08:30 AM 02/29/2000
                                                       001101845 - 3185305
II 

Calendar No. 175 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1852 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for graduate medical education programs in children’s hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Hospital 

5 GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN’S HOS7 PITALS THAT OPERATE GRADUATE MEDICAL 

8 EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 340E of the Public 

10 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1852 PCS 

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘through 2005 

2 and each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011’’ and in3 serting ‘‘through 2016’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (f)(1)(A)(iv), by striking 

5 ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (f)(2)(D), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

8 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Section 340E(b)(3)(D) 

9 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 256e(b)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ‘‘Not later than the 

11 end of fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than 

12 the end of fiscal year 2015’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 175 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1852 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauprograms in children’s hospitals. thorize support for graduate medical education 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      10.24


**AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE**


**EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT**




WHEREAS,
      effective January 1, 2007, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and J. SCOTT HAZLITT, a Colorado resident (“Executive”), entered
      into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”); and





WHEREAS, on
      August
      29, 2007, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, after review of an Executive Compensation Market
      Analysis and Report by an independent  human
      resource professional services firm, the Board of Directors increased the
      salaries of our executive officers to be commensurate with industry
      standards ;





NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree:





1.  Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended retroactively effective August 29, 2007 and,
      as
      amended, reads as follows:





(a)  *Base
      Salary* .
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $135,000, payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.





2.  All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective August 29, 2007.




EMPLOYER
              :


CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATIONBy:
            s/Gifford
              A
              DieterleGifford
                A Dieterle, President EXECUTIVE:s/ J.
                Scott HazlittJ.
                  Scott Hazlitt