alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, John H. Curtis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigned's knowledge:



|Dated: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/JOHN H. CURTISJohn H. Curtis Chief Executive
Officer
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT (23.1) CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Horizon Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated February 13, 1998,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Horizon Bancorp, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option Plan (Form S-8, No. 33-73926) and the
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Form S-3, No. 33-61695) of Horizon Bancorp, Inc. of
our report dated February 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Horizon Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Charleston, West Virginia
March 30, 1998



                                       55
I 

# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,Fl1,RSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LASHAWN ANTHONY SMITH NO. 2022 KW 1377



### MARCH 13, 2023

In Re: LaShawn Anthony Smith, applying for supervisory writs,

32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 587665.

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include a copy of the district court's ruling on the Motion for Court to Take Notice of Law, all pertinent: minute entries and/or transcripts, particularly the transcript of the district court's hearing on the motion at issue, the ' indictment, the habitual offender bill of information, the state's answer to his application for postconviction relief, and any other portions of the district court record that might support the claims raised in the writ application. Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for. rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Lou~siana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. Any future filir).g on this issue should include the entire contents of this ~ pplication, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT MRT WRC CHH
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2005 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To reauthorize the Combating Autism Act of 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combating Autism Reauthorization Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE AND RESEARCH PROGRAM.

    Part R of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
280i et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 399AA(e), by striking ``2011'' and inserting 
        ``2014'';
            (2) in section 399BB(g), by striking ``2011'' and inserting 
        ``2014'';
            (3) in section 399CC(f), by striking ``2011'' and inserting 
        ``2014''; and
            (4) in section 399DD--
                    (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Not later than 
                4 years after the date of enactment of the Combating 
                Autism Act of 2006'' and inserting ``Not later than 2 
                years after the date of enactment of the Combating 
                Autism Reauthorization Act of 2011''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b), in paragraphs (4) and (5), 
                by striking ``the 4-year period beginning on the date 
                of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``the 6-year 
                period beginning on the date of enactment of the 
                Combating Autism Act of 2006''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 399EE of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i-4) 
is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 399EE. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) Developmental Disabilities Surveillance and Research 
Program.--To carry out section 399AA, there is authorized to be 
appropriated $22,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2014.
    ``(b) Autism Education, Early Detection, and Intervention.--To 
carry out section 399BB, there is authorized to be appropriated 
$48,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2014.
    ``(c) Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee; Certain Other 
Programs.--To carry out sections 399CC, 404H, and 409C, there is 
authorized to be appropriated $161,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
2011 through 2014.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

            To reauthorize the Combating Autism Act of 2006.
```
#### Seldon NEWBY, Appellant, v. Minerva NEWBY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 18, 1955.

Edward P. Roark, Delbert Eagle, Lancaster, for appellant.

Cecil C. Sanders, Lancaster, for appellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The appellant, Seldon Newby, was granted an absolute divorce from appellee, Minerva Newby, on January 6, 1954. In the judgment Mr. Newby was awarded the custody of Doris, age 16, and Charles, age 14. The custody of Ellen, age 11, and Janice, age 3, was given to Mrs. Newby.

On February 13, 1954, Mr. Newby petitioned the court to grant him the custody of Ellen and Janice. . After a hearing, this motion was overruled, and an order was entered continuing the custody of these two children with Mrs. Newby. This appeal is prosecuted from that order.

The chief concern of courts in this character of case is the welfare of the children. Where children of tender years are involved, courts ordinarily will not deprive the mother of their custody, unless it clearly appears that she is not a fit person to have the children. Hager v. Hager, 309 Ky. 803, 219 S.W.2d 10; Price v. Price, 306 Ky. 214, 206 S.W.2d 924; Wills v. Wills, 168 Ky. 35, 181 S.W. 619.

We find no evidence in this record that appellee is of bad moral character, or is otherwise unfit to rear her children'. ' The only evidence showing a change of condi-

*780tion since the original' custody order was -entered, is that appellee has married Thomas Guy, and that they have moved to South Portsmouth to seek employment. However, there is no evidence that the welfare of the children is being neglected.

In awarding custody of children in a divorce action a wide discretion must be given to the Chancellor, and it is only where this discretion has been abused that this Court will interfere with his decision. Price v. Price, 306 Ky. 214, 206 S.W.2d 924. Under this record we do not entertain any doubt as to the correctness of the Chancellor’s decision.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 10,  2010 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell                                      |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |  

**Gregory A. Shortell*****Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.3

I, Bruce J. Klatsky, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  April 7, 2004

| | /s/ Bruce J. Klatsky                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Bruce J. Klatsky                    
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Roy MANNING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27712.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1955.

William F. Jackson, J. C. McEvoy, Hempstead, for appellant.

C. W. Karisch, County Atty., Hempstead, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is a violation of Article 924, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which denounces, among other things, the placing of substances deleterious to fish life in the waters of this State for the purpose of catching fish; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $100.

This is a companion case to Manning v. State, 284 S.W.2d 903.

The issues here presented are the same, and we will omit a restatement of them.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-11;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.   Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7271

JULIO CESAR GUTIERREZ-JARAMILLO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GILMER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-00172-FPS-JES)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Cesar Gutierrez-Jaramillo, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin 

Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julio Cesar Gutierrez-Jaramillo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Gutierrez-Jaramillo v. Fed. Corr. Inst. Gilmer, No. 

5:16-cv-00172-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va., Aug. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth C. Wiedrich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the 

         operations of the Company. 

|                        |                                                                         |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 14, 2009 | */s/ Kenneth C. Wiedrich*

Kenneth C. Wiedrich

Chief Financial Officer |

**[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unico, Incorporated and will be retained by Unico, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]**
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1922 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1922

 To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access to Federal 
lands to carry out certain security activities in the Southwest border 
                    region, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2011

 Mr. Quayle (for himself, Mr. Flake, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Gosar, 
  Mr. Schweikert, Mr. King of New York, and Mrs. Miller of Michigan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
    Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland 
Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access to Federal 
lands to carry out certain security activities in the Southwest border 
                    region, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER SECURITY ON CERTAIN FEDERAL LANDS.

    (a) Support for Border Security.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall have access to 
        Federal lands for security activities, including--
                    (A) routine motorized patrols; and
                    (B) the deployment of temporary tactical 
                infrastructure.
            (2) Operation.--The security activities described in 
        paragraph (1) shall be conducted, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, in a manner that the Secretary of Homeland 
        Security determines will best protect the natural and cultural 
        resources on Federal lands.
    (b) Limitation Regarding Intermingled Private and State Land.--This 
section shall not apply to any private or State-owned land within the 
boundaries of Federal lands.
    (c) Federal Lands Defined.--In this section, the term ``Federal 
lands'' includes all land, including a component of the National 
Wilderness Preservation System, under the control of any Federal 
department or agency with legal jurisdiction over such land that is 
located within 150 miles of the Southwest border region.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 15, 2017

Order 

Clerk

September 15, 2017

156192(28)

HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellant, SC: 156192

v COA: 336464

Montcalm CC: 2015-020669-CK

ADVANCED FARM EQUIPMENT, LLC,

Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee,

and

BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff/

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee

and

KYLE LENNARD, STEFANI LENNARD, and

LENNARD AG COMPANY,

Intervening Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff/counterdefendant-appellant to 

extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on September 13, 

2017, is accepted for filing.
Exhibit 99.1



                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings


I, J. Philip Hester, Sr., certify that:

     1. I have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Chestatee
Bancshares, Inc.;

     2. To my knowledge, the information in this report is true in all important
respects as of June 30, 2002; and

     3. This report contains all information about the company of which I am
aware that I believe is important to a reasonable investor, in light of the
subjects required to be addressed in this report, as of June 30, 2002.

     For purposes of this certification, information is "important to a
reasonable investor" if:


          (a) There is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would
     view the information as significantly altering the total mix of information
     in the report; and

          (b) The report would be misleading to a reasonable investor if the
     information is omitted from the report.


BY:   /s/ J. Philip Hester, Sr.                      Subscribed and sworn to
      -----------------------------------            before me this 24th day of
      J. Philip Hester, Sr., President and C.E.O.    September, 2002
      (Principal Executive Officer)

DATE: September 24, 2002
      ------------------                             /s/ Stacey Bruce
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Notary Public

                                                     My Commission Expires:
                                                     November 6, 2004






<PAGE>