alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HERNANDEZ v. STATE.

No. 26624.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1953.

John W. Carlisle, Robert T. Grammer, Houston, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the sale of marijuana; the punishment, ten years.

Officer Brannon testified that on the day in question, while dressed in plain clothes, he went to a shoe shine stand and inquired of the appellant if one Avola had been there and that appellant replied that Avola would be there in a short while. The witness stated that he took a seat; that the appellant shined his shoes; that he asked the appellant if he handled any “stuff” and that appellant replied that he had none but did have some “weed.” The officer stated that he told the appellant he would take three cigarettes if appellant would sell them for fifty cents each and that appellant handed him three marijuana cigarettes. The witness explained that in the vernacular of the underworld “stuff” meant heroin and other forms of dope and that “weed” meant marijuana.

The State proved the proper chain of custody, and chemist Beardsley, of the Department of Public Safety, identified the cigarettes as being marijuana.

The appellant did not testify and did not offer any witnesses in his behalf.

Appellant’s brief asks for a reversal of this cause because of certain argument which he alleges was made by the prosecuting attorney. The record contains no bills of exception setting forth such argument. This Court is without authority to consider any argument which is alleged to have been made without a bill of exception certifying that such argument was in fact made.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                          $         5
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,990
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    12
<BONDS>                               1,983
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,995
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00


</TABLE>
|   | **Exhibit 21** |
|--------|----------------|

 

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

**Parent**

 

Parke Bancorp, Inc.

 

|                           |   | **State or Other**  |   |           |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|----------------|
|                           |   | **Jurisdiction of** |   | **Percentage** |
| **Subsidiaries**               |   | **Incorporation**   |   | **Ownership**  |
|                           |   |                |   |           |
| Parke Bank                     |   | New Jersey          |   | 100%           |
| Parke Capital Trust I          |   | Delaware            |   | 100%           |
| Parke Capital Trust II         |   | Delaware            |   | 100%           |
| Parke Capital Trust III        |   | Delaware            |   | 100%           |
|                           |   |                |   |           |
| **Subsidiaries of Parke Bank** |   |                |   |           |
|                           |   |                |   |           |
| Parke Capital Markets          |   | New Jersey          |   | 100%           |
| Farm Folly, LLC                |   | New Jersey          |   | 100%           |
| Taylor Glen LLC                |        | New Jersey          |        | 100%           |
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1169

___________ Charles A. Trobaugh, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern Edwin F. Kelly; John A. Morrissey; * District of Iowa. Timothy Dille; Bridget Chambers; * Thomas Miller; Tom Vilsack, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 22, 2000 Filed: May 30, 2000

___________ BeforeMcMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Charles Trobaugh filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various county and state officials, claiming Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment violations basedon the officials’ failure to inform him that his counsel had not filed a brief in his state criminal appeal, and their resistance to relief Mr. Trobaugh sought upon learning1 The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. -2- of counsel’s omission after he was discharged from his state sentence. The district court 1 dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mr. Trobaugh appeals. Reviewing de novo, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we conclude that dismissal was proper, because defendants had no duty to inform Mr. Trobaugh of his counsel’s actions, and because the defendant county attorneys and attorneys general were entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity, see Buckley v. Fitzsimmons , 509 U.S. 259, 273 (1993). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Trobaugh’s pending motions. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23–0272

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA

and PAUL FREDERICK HENKE, M.D., on

behalf of themselves and their patients,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA and AUSTIN KNUDSEN,

Attorney General of the State of Montana, in his

official capacity, and his agents and successors,

Defendants and Appellants.

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellants’ Motion for a 30-day Extension of Time, 

and good cause appearing therefore, Appellants are granted an extension of time to 

and including January 15, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its Reply 

Brief. 

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 5 2023

12/05/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0272
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Capital, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. WillnerMichael S. WillnerChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.November 13, 2003/s/ Dinesh C. JainDinesh C. JainExecutive Vice President, Chief OperatingOfficer and Interim Chief Financial OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.November 13, 2003
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

 

I, Geoffrey M. Boyd,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
|   | May 12,  2006 |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |   |   |
|   |               |   |   |
|   | Sign:              | /S/ | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|   |               | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|   |               | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 10.33



EXHIBIT 10.33





MEMORANDUM









To:Donald P. Aiken



From:Carole F. St. Mark



Re:Election as Chairman of the Board

Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Company")



Date:December 18, 2003





The Board of Directors of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Board"), with you abstaining, elected you Chairman of the Board, effective February 1, 2004.



As non-executive Chairman, the Board has approved payment to you of $12,500 per month in addition to your compensation as a non-employee Director of the Company.  This fee will be reviewed periodically by this Committee and will be paid to you until you cease to be Chairman of the Board for any reason.





	 	
/s/ Carol F. St. Mark
	 
	 	
Carole F. St. Mark, Chair

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

of the Board of Directors
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1698 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase penalties for 

employing illegal aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2011 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase 

penalties for employing illegal aliens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘10k Run for the Bor5 der Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR EMPLOYING ILLEGAL 

7 ALIENS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4)(A)) 

10 is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1698 IH

1 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘$250 and not 

2 more than $2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000 and not 

3 more than $80,000’’; 

4 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘$2,000 and not 

5 more than $5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$80,000 and not 

6 more than $200,000’’; and 

7 (3) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘$3,000 and not 

8 more than $10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$120,000 and 

9 not more than $1,600,000’’. 

10 (b) USE OF ADDITIONAL PENALTY FUNDS.—Not11 withstanding any other provision of law, of the additional 

12 amounts of fines paid under section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the 

13 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

14 1324a(e)(4)(A)) by one or more employers and that are 

15 attributable to the amendments made by subsection (a)— 

16 (1) if State or local law enforcement officials 

17 have provided material assistance in the investiga18 tion or prosecution of cases of such employers that 

19 resulted in such fines— 

20 (A) 80 percent shall be paid, in a manner 

21 specified by the Secretary of Homeland Secu22 rity, to the State or local State law enforcement 

23 agencies which employed such individuals; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1698 IH

1 (B) 20 percent shall be used by the Sec2 retary to cover costs of detention of illegal 

3 aliens; and 

4 (2) if paragraph (1) does not apply— 

5 (A) 80 percent shall be paid to States (and 

6 political subdivisions of States) under the State 

7 Criminal Alien Assistance Program under sec8 tion 241(i) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1251(i)) for 

9 purposes of reimbursing those States and polit10 ical subdivisions for costs of incarceration of 

11 undocumented criminal aliens; and 

12 (B) 20 percent shall be used by the Sec13 retary to cover costs of detention of illegal 

14 aliens in Federal facilities. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply to violations occurring on or 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, William  Stewart,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Host Ventures, Inc., for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2006 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial
condition and results of operations of Host Ventures, Inc.

Date:  September 14, 2006

                                                  /s/ William Stewart
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  William Stewart
                                                  President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Ex parte SIMS.

No. 26591.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1953.

Smith & Porter, Longview, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

It appears from the record tha,t the relator, William Roland Sims, is confined in the state penitentiary, having been convicted in four different cases. Three of such cases arose in Gregg County, Texas, and the fourth case arose in Upshur County, Texas,, after the conviction of the three cases in Gregg County. In each of such cases in Gregg County the appellant was sentenced to serve not less than two nor more than three years in the state penitentiary. One of said cases, to-wit, No. 2123-B, was made cumulative of the prior sentence in No. 2122-B. After said three convictions in Gregg County, the appellant was convicted of a further offense in Upshur County in. Cause No. 6490, and sentenced to a term of two years in the state penitentiary with a further cumulative sentence, as follows: “This sentence is to be cumulative of Defendant’s conviction for cattle theft in Gregg County.” There is no further identification of the conviction in Gregg County. It is also shown by the record of the Texas Prison System that the appellant has served nine years and ten days relative to these sentences in such counties.

The sentence in Upshur County is not properly made cumulative of any of the sentences in Gregg County, so the same is treated merely as a straight sentence for a term of two years with no cumulation portion attached.

Under the facts presented to us the appellant has served his time and is entitled to his discharge from the state penitentiary. The State’s Attorney confesses error in the matter, and we think that Ex parte Johnson, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 114, 218 S.W.2d 200, is' *335authority to the effect that the attempted cu-mulation of the sentence out of Upshur County is void and of no effect.

The relator is therefore ordered discharged from his present confinement.
#### Yancey Lee CUMMINS et al., Appellants v. H. Clyde REEVES, Commissioner of Revenue, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 8, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1953.

Franklin P. Hays, William A. MacKen-zie, Jr., and Skaggs, Hays & Fahey, Louisville, for appellants.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Hal O. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roy H. Pennington, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Scent, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

COMBS, Justice.

This is a companion case to that of Collins v. Kentucky Tax Commission, Ky., 261 S.W.2d 303. What is said in the opinion in that case is applicable and decisive here.

The judgment is affirmed.

STEWART, MOREMEN and MILLI-KEN, JJ., dissenting.
Exhibit 31(b)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interphase Corporation (the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
     5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
   Date: March 21, 2011
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Thomas N. Tipton Jr.Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Support for Conferences and 
Scientific Meetings (Parent R13 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: March 26-28, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Caitlin A. Brennan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-7792, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6a5a7afb2aaafa8e8a4b4a3a8a8a7a8f486a8afaee8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6506040c11090c0b4b0717000b0b040b57250b0c0d4b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 26, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-04254 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>