alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Revised OMB Supporting Statement**  **Promising Strategies in Federal College Acces s Programs** 

**Abt Associates Inc. Appendix B**  **. Power Calculations for Continuous Outcomes**  **▌ pg**  **. 1**  

## Ap **pendix B .**  **Pow er Calculations for Continuous Outcomes**  Using the standard power analysis equation to estimate the MDES for continuous outcomes, we make the following assumptions: (1) the demonstration includes 100 schools (2) 50 schools are assigned to each group (3) the full sample includes 200 students per school (4) the student and parent survey samples includes 40 percent of the full sample (5) the surveys obtain 80 percent response rates (6) intra- class correlations of .05, .10, and .15 (as ICCs might be higher for some continuous outcome measures, such as financial literacy scale score) (7) the school -level R- square equals .32 **Exhibit** B.1 demonstrates that by our estimates, the MDES will be .11 to .19 standard deviations for outcomes based on administrative data (e.g., number of college preparatory courses completed) and .13 to .19 standard deviations for outcomes based on survey data (e.g., amount of college savings; financial literacy scale score). According to our estimates, the study is powered to detect relatively small impacts on continuous outcomes; according to Cohen (1988), standardized effect sizes < .20 are considered small. The MDES will be at the upper end of this range if ICCs are larger (e.g., ICC=.15), and the MDES will at the lower end of the range if ICCs are smaller. **Exhibit B.1 .**  **MDES Estimates for Continuous Outcomes from Administrative and Survey Data**  **Intraclass Correlation Ad**  **ministrative Data Outcomes (200 students/school)**  **Survey Data Outcomes (64**  **students/school) 1**  .05 0.11 standard deviations 0.13 standard deviations .10 0.15 standard deviations 0.16 standard deviations .15 0.19 standard deviations 0.19 standard deviations 1 The survey sample includes 40% of the students in the full sample (i.e., 80 students/school); with an 80 % response rate, the Abt study team assumes 64 students/school in the analysis sample for survey data outcomes. Power analyses for continuous outcomes are based on the following formula (Schochet, 2008):

= ( , , ) ∗ ( 1 − ) ( 1 − ) + ( 1 − )

( 1 − ) Where : estimated minimum detectable effect size for the treatment impact;

( , , ) : a constant that is a function of the significance level (α), statistical power (β), and the number of degrees of freedom (df);**Revised OMB Supporting Statement**  **Promising Strategies in Federal College Acces s Programs** 

**Abt Associates Inc. Appendix B**  **. Power Calculations for Continuous Outcomes**  **▌ pg**  **. 2** 

: school -level variance in the outcome; : student-level variance in the outcome; : amount of school -level variance in the outcome explained by covariates; : amount of student-level variance in the outcome explained by covariates; s: number of schools; p: proportion of schools assigned ot the treatment condition; n: average number of students in each school; and σ: standard deviation of the outcome measure for the control group.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 520

_____________________________
J AMAEL M. T YSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for D uval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. July 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9 .330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Kathryn Lane, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief

- Criminal Appeals, and Sharon Traxler, Assi stant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 97-10433

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

WILBERT RAY ADAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Reception and Diagnostic

Center; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE -

ROBERTSON UNIT, Classification Committee; H D

SHAFFER, Dr; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE - ROBERTSON UNIT, Mail Room; YBARRA,

Sgt.; TDCJ, PARDON AND PAROLE DIVISION;

STEWART, Officer; FUENTES, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-186

December 16, 1997

Before WEINER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
-2-

Wilbert Ray Adams, Texas prisoner # 629929, appeals the

judgment of the district court dismissing his civil rights action

as frivolous. He contends, succinctly, that the district court

erred in treating all of the incidents as separate claims and

ruling that the claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

Adams argues that the theory of his civil rights action was that

there was a racially motivated conspiracy to retaliate against him

for exercising his right of access to the courts.

“[A]ny cause of action against the defendants accrued as soon

as [Adams] knew or should have known of the overt acts involved in

the alleged conspiracy.” Helton v. Clements, 832 F.2d 332, 335

(5th Cir. 1987). Given the facts presented in the complaint, Adams

knew or should have known about the alleged conspiracy more than

two years before he filed his complaint on May 13, 1996. All of

his claims except those related to his convictions for delivery of

drugs and forgery are time-barred. To the extent that a judgment

in favor of Adams would necessarily imply the invalidity of those

convictions or sentences, his claim is not cognizable because there

is no showing that the convictions or sentences have been

invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S. Ct. 2364

(1994). Moreover, Adams’ complaint did not contain any facts

indicating the existence of an agreement, nor did it demonstrate

any type of collusion among the defendants. See Way v. Mueller

Brass Co., 840 F.2d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 1988) (holding that “‘bald
-3-

allegations‘ of an agreement do not suffice” to show conspiracy).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing

the action as frivolous. Adams’ appeal is without arguable merit.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William Major, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10 KSB of Major Creations Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  January 27, 2006





By: /s/ William Major

---------------------

William Major

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 135)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), Richard A. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1)          The report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Sign:                                 | /S/   Richard A. Smith |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                      |                             |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |                             |   |
| May 16, 2005                     |                             |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2115 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2115

 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2011

   Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Austria, Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Chu, Mr. 
 McDermott, Mr. Honda, and Mr. Faleomavaega) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans of World War II 
Family Reunification Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT.

    Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) Aliens who are eligible for an immigrant visa under 
        paragraph (1) or (3) of section 203(a) and who have a parent 
        who was naturalized pursuant to section 405 of the Immigration 
        Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1440 note).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.1


 


Equity
Transfer Agreement


(English
Translation)


 


Transferor
(Party A): Mr. Xinhui Li


ID
card no.:


  


Transferee (Party B): Hunan Xiao De Tian Xia Senior Care Industry Management Co., Ltd. 


Unified Social Credit Code: 



 


According
to the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China and other relevant laws and regulations and the articles of association
of Hengyang City Red Sunset Tourism Development Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), through friendly consultation, Party
A and Party B, based on the principle of equality and mutual benefit, honesty and credibility, agree to the following terms and
conditions of the equity transfer agreement:


 


	1.	Party
    A is the shareholder of the Company and its subscribed capital contribution is RMB 510,000, accounting for 100% of the Company’s
    total capital stock, which has been paid in. Now Party A agrees to voluntarily transfer 100% equity interest in the Company
    (the subscribed and paid-in capital of RMB 510,000) to Party B.
	 	 
	2.	Party
    B agrees to accept the transfer of the aforesaid equity interest.
	 	 
	3.	In
    this equity transfer, Party A has paid in capital of RMB 510,000, and the transfer price is RMB 510,000. The transfer price
    shall be paid within one month following the date of this agreement.
	 	 
	4.	Party
    A warrants that the equity interests to be transferred to Party B are free and clear of all claims or security interests owned
    by any third party or legal proceedings.
	 	 
	5.	From
    the date of the equity transfer, Party A shall no longer enjoy the corresponding shareholder rights or assume the corresponding
    obligations and its rights and obligations in the Company shall be borne by Party B.
	 	 
	6.	Party
    A shall cooperate with the Company and Party B in handling relevant legal procedures including approval and registration of
    change, and provide necessary assistance.
	 	 
	7.	This
    agreement shall come into force upon being signed and sealed by both parties. The Company shall accordingly amend the list
    of its shareholders, issue a new capital contribution certificate, and apply to the registration authority for the relevant
    change registration.
	 	 
	8.	This
    agreement is made in quadruplicate, with each party holding one copy and the third copy shall be filed with the Company and
    the fourth copy shall be submitted to apply for change registration.


 


	Party A
    (seal):	/s/ Xinhui Li	 
	Party B (seal):	seal of Hunan Xiao De Tian Xia Senior Care Industry Management Co., Ltd	 




 


 


November 23, 2018
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99(i)

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Comm Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, William F.
Farber, Sr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: March 19, 2003                       /s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           William F. Farber, Sr.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chairman of the Board/Director
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written Statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      182
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      March 16, 2007





By: /s/
      Daniel Bernstein


Daniel
      Bernstein, President


and
      Chief
      Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1960 

To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry out 

approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2017. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2011 

Mr. WITTMAN (for himself and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation 

to carry out approved wetlands conservation projects 

under the North American Wetlands Conservation Act 

through fiscal year 2017. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet5 lands Conservation Extension Act of 2011’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1960 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Con3 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2083 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2083

To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, 
 Port Gibson, and Raymond for addition to Vicksburg National Military 
                                 Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2011

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, 
 Port Gibson, and Raymond for addition to Vicksburg National Military 
                                 Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Champion Hill, Port Gibson, and 
Raymond Battlefields Addition Act''.

SEC. 2. VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK.

    (a) Acquisition of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to 
        in this Act as the ``Secretary'') may acquire the land or 
        interests in land within the area identified as ``Modified Core 
        Battlefield'' for the Port Gibson Unit, the Champion Hill Unit, 
        and the Raymond Unit and the area identified as ``Golden West 
        Cemetery'' in Port Gibson, as generally depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Vicksburg National Military Park-Proposed 
        Battlefield Additions'', numbered 306/100986A, and dated April 
        2011.
            (2) Methods of acquisition.--Land and interests in land may 
        be acquired under paragraph (1) by donation, purchase from a 
        willing seller with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, 
        except that land owned by the State of Mississippi or any 
        political subdivisions of the State may be acquired only by 
        donation.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The map described in subsection (a)(1) 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate 
offices of the National Park Service.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment.--On the acquisition of land by the 
Secretary under subsection (a)--
            (1) the acquired land shall be added to Vicksburg National 
        Military Park;
            (2) the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park 
        shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the land; and
            (3) the acquired land shall be administered as part of the 
        Vicksburg National Military Park in accordance with applicable 
        laws (including regulations).
                                 <all>
```
#### Floyd Curtis INGRAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27343.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 19, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Drunken driving is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of ■ facts or bills, of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2005

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast
Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that: (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Annual
Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 30, 2006



/s/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. KnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer