alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the 
                   ``Matthew A. Pucino Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Matthew A. Pucino Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew A. 
Pucino Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara Tarbell, Respondent. Stanley Frankel, Appellant; Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed *641April 4, 1989, which, *inter alia,*assessed Stanley Frankel for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

The evidence in the record supports the determination that sufficient direction and control were exercised over those individuals engaged by Stanley Frankel in the operation of his dental practice to be considered his employees *(see, Matter of Polinsky [Hartnett],*163 AD2d 684). Although they signed independent contractor agreements, he set their hours, rate of pay and required them to punch a time clock; the individual also worked only on his premises and used his office and equipment *(see, Matter of Bertsch [Intertek Servs. Corp.—Hart-nett]*159 AD2d 898). The conclusions reached were within the power of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board as fact finder and its decision was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Di Maria v Ross,*52 NY2d 771). Frankel’s remaining contentions have been found to be lacking in merit.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 12-1131 JOSEPH DELONG, Petitioner, Appellant,

v. THOMAS DICKHAUT, Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on May 6, 2013 is amended as follows: On page 4, line 2, change "December 1, 2012" to "December 1, 2011". On page 4, line 3, change "December 21, 2012" to "December 21, 2011". On page 4, line 5, change "December 1, 2012" to "December 1, 2011".
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. IN23-14-000]

                    With respect to an order issued by the Commission on February 21, 2024, in the above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, the staff of the Office of Enforcement are designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this docket.[1]                                          Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2023), they will not serve as advisors to the Commission or take part in the Commission's review of any offer of settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2023), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory staff concerning any deliberations in this docket.                

Exceptions to this designation as non-decisional are:

Danielle Mechling

Michael Raibman

Rebecca Wahlenmayer

Shawn Au

Benjamin Jarrett

Serrita Hill

Steven Bundick

Dated: February 22, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Ketchup Caddy, LLC and Philip Mango,*                         186 FERC ¶ 61,132 (2024).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-04173 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
31.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
David Mintz, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Tofutti Brands Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



Date:
May 14, 2020



|/s/
    David Mintz*        | 
|--------------------------- | 
|David
    Mintz             | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer | 



*
The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made
available for

inspection
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,361
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         112,493
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,755
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,834
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         86,289
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,914
<DEPOSITS>                                     137,576
<SHORT-TERM>                                       715
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,645
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,485
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 154,914
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,200
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,719
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   163
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,664
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,788
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,294
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  50
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    688
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         688
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.96
<LOANS-NON>                                        636
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    353
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,258
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      364
<RECOVERIES>                                       108
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,302
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               868
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            434
        

</TABLE>
#### The UNITED STATES of America v. The SECURITIES COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, Inc. (Whose Name Formerly was First Wisconsin Company).

No. 6206.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 14, 1937.

B. J. Husting, U. S. Atty., and E. J. Koelzer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Milwaukee, Wis.

Miller, Mack & Fairchild and H. G Hirschboeck, all of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and MAJOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without further costs to either party.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the above-named appellant and appellee, through their respective attorneys, that the appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in the above-entitled cause may be dismissed without further cost to either party and that an order so dismissing said appeal may be entered forthwith.”
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lafayette Community Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
R. Zimmerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David R. Zimmerman
-----------------------------
David R. Zimmerman
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2003


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and not for any other purpose, and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

                                       24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DICUT, INC.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,809                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,809                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,809                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         8,370                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,561)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,809                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,386                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,386)                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,386)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,386)                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)                     .00


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 1 9 - 0 606

__________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: Z.L. a Youth. **ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION**

__________________________________________________________________ Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion of Appell an t , Z.L. , for an extension of time, until May 28, 2020 , to file and serve his Opening Brief. Upon review of Appellant ’s Unopposed Motion, the Court hereby grants Appellee’s Motion for an Extension of time. The Appellee’s Answer Brief shall be filed and served on or before May 28, 2020 . Dated this the __ day of April, 2020 . By: ____________________

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2020

04/29/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0606
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1961 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1961

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 
 income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 
                       from marginal properties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2011

  Mr. Boren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 
 income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 
                       from marginal properties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME LIMIT ON PERCENTAGE DEPLETION 
              FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCED FROM MARGINAL 
              PROPERTIES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (H) of section 613A(c)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to oil and natural gas produced 
from marginal properties) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(H) Nonapplication of taxable income limit with 
                respect to marginal production.--The second sentence of 
                subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply to so 
                much of the allowance for depletion as is determined 
                under subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 22.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                               Jurisdiction of
                  Name                                          Incorporation
                  ----                                         ---------------

Bel Fuse Limited                                                 Hong Kong

Bel Fuse Macau LDA                                               Macau

Bel Fuse Europe Ltd.                                             United Kingdom


Bel Fuse America Inc.                                            Delaware

Bel Fuse Delaware Inc.                                           Delaware

Bel Fuse California Inc.                                         California

Bel Ventures Inc.                                                Delaware

Bel Power Products Inc.                                          Delaware

Bel Power (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd.                                    China

Bel Transformer Inc.                                             Delaware

Bel Connector Inc.                                               Delaware

Bel Components Ltd.                                              Hong Kong
Dear Mr. Hernandez:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3475). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
**Exhibit 31.3**

**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael S.Willner certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)           designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

|   | /s/ Michael S. Willner      |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Michael S.  Willner         |
|   | Vice Chairman and           |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer    |
|   | Insight  Capital, Inc. |
|   | August 14,  2006       |

 

----