alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 14672)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Analyzing Early Events in TB and TB/HIV Infection for Interventional Targets (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         March 21, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F40, Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert C. Unfer, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F40, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5035,                         *unferrc@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 22, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-04061 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _____________________________ FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) January 10, 2011   PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)  Registrants telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)  Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:  ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))  ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))      ITEM 7.01 REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE On January 10, 2011, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) issued a press release to update its previous guidance for earnings per share for the fourth quarter and full year 2010 and to reaffirm its previous guidance for revenue for the fourth quarter and full year 2010.  A copy of this press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report. The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS (d)  Exhibits. ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated January 10, 2011.       SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION  By:/s/ Bruce Goldstein Bruce Goldstein Senior Vice President and Controller  Date: January 10, 2011   Exhibit Index


|        |                                       
|------- | --------------------------------------
|Exhibit | Description                           
|99.1    | Press Release, dated January 10, 2011.
```

[Federal Register: June 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 111)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 32857]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jn10-8]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 691

 
Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG) and National Science and 
Mathematics Access To Retain Talent Grant (National Smart Grant) 
Programs

CFR Correction

    In Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 400 to End, 
revised as of July 1, 2009, on page 978, in Sec.  691.15, remove 
paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(C)(1) and (b)(1)(ii)(C)(2).

[FR Doc. 2010-14051 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23
                                                                   ----------





                   GLEIBERMAN SPEARS SHEPHERD & MENAKER, P.A.
       ----------------------------------------------------------------


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post Effective Amendment to
the Registration Statement of Form S-8 (No. 33-24648) of our report dated
October 11, 1996, the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of McRae Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as listed under
Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 3, 1996.



/s/Gleiberman Spears Shepherd & Menaker, P. A.

Charlotte, North Carolina
October 28, 1996
#### UNITED STATES COAL & COKE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Hosea HOOKS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 3, 1956.

James Sampson, William A. Rice, Harlan, Middleton, Seelbach, Wolford, Willis & Cochran, Louisville, for appellants.

G. E. Reams, Harlan, for appellees.

*919CLAY, Commissioner.

The Workmen’s Compensation Board awarded the appellee employee partial permanent disability benefits for silicosis. The actual existence of this disease was established by competent medical testimony. The circuit court confirmed the award, and on this appeal the employer maintains the employee did not introduce sufficient proof of exposure to silica dust within the requirements of KRS 342.316.

Plaintiff testified that he had worked in the employer’s coal mine for 26 years; that from 1928 to 1938 he operated “a gathering motor” which used sand for traction purposes; that for three years prior to the termination of his employment, although his regular job was that of a coal loader, he acted as an extra motorman or brakeman two or three days out of each week. He further testified that the use of the sand in the operation of the motor created a substantial amount of fine dust which he necessarily inhaled.

The employer’s evidence was to the effect that the employee operated the motor only on a few occasions .within the last five years of his employment, and it is contended that the vague and indefinite testimony of the employee did not sufficiently establish that he had been exposed to the hazards of silicosis for at least two years, as KRS 342.316 requires.

In United States Steel Co. v. Lockhart, Ky., 261 S.W.2d 643, we decided that technical proof of the presence of free silica was not required, and further that it was not necessary for the employee to prove a *continuous*exposure to the hazard for a period of two years. In Kinker v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary, Inc., Ky., 268 S.W.2d 948, we held that if the disease is shown to exist, the question of exposure to the hazard will be determined in the light of that fact.

We think the employer’s own evidence definitely shows some degree of exposure and the evidence was conflicting as to its extent. The Workmen’s Compensation Board had adequate evidence of substance upon which to base its finding that the employee was exposed to the hazard for a sufficient time to satisfy the requirements of the applicable statute.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte Edgar Frank HAMILTON.

No. 28389.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1956.

No attorney for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an original application for writ of habeas corpus .brought by the relator seeking his release from the Texas Prison System.

Relator was on July 23, 1951, convicted upon a plea of guilty in Cause No. 2604 in the District Court of Baylor County for the offense of altering a written instrument and passing the same as true, and his punishment assessed at two years. He questions the effectiveness of that portion of the Baylor County sentence which attempts to cumulate it with additional sentences. It reads as follows:

> “And the said defendant Frank Hamilton, having heretofore in the District Court of Smith County, Texas, been duly and legally convicted of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years, and the said Defendant, Frank Hamilton, also having hereto*674fore in the District Court of Tom Green County, Texas, been duly and legally convicted of the offense of theft of property of the value of $50.00 or over, and his punishment therefore having been assessed and adjudged at confinement in the penitentiary for five ' years, and he having heretofore by said courts, been sentenced in due form of law in accordance with said convictions, it is further considered, ordered, and adjudged that the punishment herein adjudged against the said defendant Frank Hamilton shall begin when the said judgment and sentence on’ the preceding convictions shall have ceased to operate.”

The four recommended elements of the prior conviction that should be incorporated in such an order, according to Willson’s Criminal Forms, Sixth Edition, Section 2932, are:

1. -The number of the prior conviction,

2. The correct name of the court in which the prior conviction was had,

3. The date of the prior conviction, and

4. The term of years assessed in the prior case.

When we take judicial knowledge that there is more than one District Court in both Smith and Tom Green Counties, then the above order incorporates only the term of years assessed in the prior cases. The correct designation of the courts, the numbers of the cases and dates of the prior convictions are absent.

This case may be distinguished from Ex parte Bell, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 530, because in that case Palo Pinto County had only one District Court.

In the absence of a valid order of cumu-lation, the relator has long since served all three sentences.

The relief prayed for is granted, and the relator is ordered discharged.
#### A. W. BROWNING, et al., Appellants, v. E. G. BROWNING, et ux., Appellees.

No. 3211.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Oct. 28, 1955.

*829C. F. Sentell, Snyder, for appellants.

*H.*J. Brice, Snyder, Turpin, Kerr & Smith, Midland, for appellees.

LONG, Justice.

A. W. Browning and W. B. Browning and wife, Pearl Browning, instituted this suit against E. G. Browning and wife, Jewell Browning, in the District Court of Scurry County, Texas.

After a trial before the court with a jury, judgment was entered on the 14th day of March, 1955, in favor of E. G. Browning and wife, Jewell Browning. Plaintiffs filed a motion for new trial on March 12, 1955, which was overruled by order entered on April 11, 1955. Thereafter, on April 15, 1955, plaintiffs gave notice of appeal to this court

On April 21, 1955, Albert Browning filed in said cause a suggestion of death, stating that plaintiff, A. W. Browning, died on March 31, 1955, and that said Albert Browning is the son of said A. W. Browning and requested the court that he be substituted as plaintiff in the case.

 On April 21, 1955, Albert Browning filed in said cause his affidavit of inability to pay costs. Plaintiffs W. B. Browning and wife, Pearl Browning, have filed no appeal bond nor affidavit of inability to pay costs of appeal in this case. The Statement of Facts and Transcript have not been filed in this court and no transcript has been re1 quested in the trial court. E. G. Browning and wife, Jewell Browning, defendants in the court below, have filed in this court a motion to Affirm on Certificate as to A. W. Browning and Albert Browning. It is shown by said motion that W. B. Browning and wife, Pearl Browning, have filed no appeal bond or affidavit of inability to pay costs in the trial court and have not requested a transcript in said cause. Under such circumstances, this court has no jurisdiction as to the said W. B. Browning and wife, Pearl Browning. It is further called to our attention that Albert Browning has filed his affidavit of inability to pay costs but that he has not filed in this court any Statement of Facts or Transcript and has made no request for the transcript in the trial court. Under these circumstances it is our duty to grant the motion to Affirm on Certificate as to A. W. Browning and Albert Browning. Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 386 and 387.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to A. W. Browning and Albert Browning.
EXHIBIT 32

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


Exhibit 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Jointland  Development,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Kexi
Xu, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 15, 2006

/s/ Kexi Xu
---------------------
Kexi Xu,
Acting Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 1197 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM044AD
SIL 54 - 035, R01 --- 7/9/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket **MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
# South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive , Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

Mr. Alex Krichevsky Air Pollution Specialist Stationary Source Division Air Resources Board 1 001 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: SIP Submittal: Rule 

### 223 Dear Ms Rump: January 15, 2009

Attached you will find information pertaining to Rule 

### 223 which was adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Governing Board on 6/2/06. We are requesting that upon your review and concurrence the attached information be provided to EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP. If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Larry Bowen at (909) 396- 2575. 

# l· I £C, Elaine



# Chan~ **~** Deputy Executive Officer

EC: LT:LMB : RP:SH Attachme nts: SIP Completeness Checklist Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources

C lean and strikeout copies of amended rule Referenced Documents Proof of Publication Signed Board Resolution/Minute s APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form Board Letter (include s public comments & responses)
cc: Andrew Steckel/EPA Region IX (w/o attachments) Laki Tisopulos/SCAQMD (w /o attachments Larry Bowen/SCAQMD (w/ o attachments) Rule 223 (w /o attachments) SIP File (w/attachments)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 10,  2009 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | **Gregory A. Shortell**       |
|                         | ***Chief Executive Officer*** |
#### Floyd Tillman LYONS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28901.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1957.

C. S. Farmer, Waco, for appellant.'

Leon B.- Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. . . .

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment; 185 days in jail and a fine of- $200'. ’

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to show that the appellant was the driver of the automobile in question.

State Highway Patrolmen Roberts and Smith both testified that the appellant was intoxicated on the day in question when they brought a 1939 model Chevrolet pickup to a halt east of Waco, but neither of them testified that the appellant was driving the pickup or how many people were in the same. The appellant and a witness whom he called denied that the appellant was intoxicated on the occasion in question, but neither of them were questioned as to who was driving the pickup.

We have concluded that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. Sharp v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 296 S.W.2d 932, and Moore v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 254 S.W.2d 520.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
**Exhibit 24**

 

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

I am the dulyqualified and acting Secretary of 4-D Neuroimaging, a California corporation(the “Corporation”).

 

The followingis a true copy of a Unanimous Written Consent duly adopted by the Board ofDirectors on December 1, 2003, which appears in the minute book of theCorporation:

 

“WHEREAS, theCorporation intends to file a Form 10-KSB with the Securities and ExchangeCommission under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for thefiscal year ended September 30, 2003;

 

RESOLVED, theboard does hereby constitute and appoint D. Scott Buchanan and Eugene C.Hirschkoff, or either of them, as their attorneys-in-fact to act in their placeand stead and to execute and to file such Annual Report and any amendments orsupplements thereto, giving and granting to said attorneys full power andauthority to do and perform each and every act whatsoever requisite andnecessary to be done in and about the premises, with full power ofsubstitution, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present at the doing thereof, and hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do or cause to be doneby virtue hereof.”

 

Suchresolution has not subsequently been amended, modified or revoked and as of thedate of this Certificate is in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate of Secretary as of December 19,2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ Eugene  C. Hirschkoff        |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Eugene C.  Hirschkoff, Secretary |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IVETTE FULLY and EDWARDS FULLY,

Appellants,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1649

[February 24, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-

017164.

Wayne Kramer of Midler & Kramer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellants.

Adam A. Diaz and Kathleen Achille of Diaz Anselmo & Associates, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.