alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**556 KA 12-01169**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JONATHAN LEWICKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 12, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Lewicki ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 13, 2014]).

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIUS L. ALLEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 620 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of April, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934

	The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") for the purpose of complyingwith Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")and section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

	Ann Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Hamsa Shadaksharappa, Senior VicePresident - Financial Services, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.(IPALCO), each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;and 
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of IPALCO.

 

 

```

/s/ Ann D. Murtlow                           /s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa
---------------------------                  -----------------------------------------------
Ann D. Murtlow                               Hamsa Shadaksharappa
President and Chief Executive Officer        Senior Vice President - Financial Services, Chief
                                             Financial Officer and Secretary
March 11, 2004                               March 11, 2004
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, February 29, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.

# Note: 

                        For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-01: Texas Majority PAC

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East Federal Political Action Fund (A21-10)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

                        Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                         *secretary@fec.gov,*                         at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

 Submitted: February 21, 2024.

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-03935 Filed 2-22-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 10.57


 


[ ***] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


 


Memorandum
Of Understandings


 


This
memorandum of understanding (this “MOU”) is entered on February 24, 2019 and is intended to reflect our mutual agreement
between Resdevco, Research and Development Ltd. (Private Company 510422223, hereinafter “Resdevco”) to Wize Pharma Ltd.
of Hanagar Hod Hasharon, Israel (“Wize”).


 


		1.	Resdevco
                                         agrees that the minimum yearly payment for USA paid by Wize in the years 2020 and 2021
                                         will be only $150.000 in place of $475,000.



 


Therefore,
so far Resdevco will have invested:


 


4X
($475,000-$150,000) = $1,300,000 into Wize’s efforts to register Conheal in the USA.


 


		2.	Wize
                                         agrees that the royalty for a 20 or 30 unit-dose eye drops package is $0.60 or [***]%
                                         (whichever is the higher) from the revenue of Wize in USA and in future contracts all
                                         over the world.
	 	 	 
		3.	Wize
                                         agrees to repay to Resdevco the difference of $650,000 for the years 2020 & 2021,
                                         within 2 years after a market license for the unit-dose eye drops is obtained by Wize
                                         in the USA.
	 	 	 
		4.	The
                                         lawyer of Resdevco will prepare a proper contract to be signed in good faith by Resdevco
                                         and Wize. So far as the proper contract is not signed, this MOU is part of the Resdevco-Wize
                                         agreement dated May 1, 2015.



 





	/s/
    Prof S. Dikstein	 	/s/ Or Eisenberg
	Resdevco Ltd.	 	Wize Pharma Ltd.
Exhibit 32.1   IDI Global, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDI Global, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Weatherly, a consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   1. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 15, 2007  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 15, 2007  /s/ Steven D. Weatherly Steven D. Weatherly Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Garth Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of AMG
Oil Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil Ltd. for the
period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: | February 14, 2007                            | 
|----- | -------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                                              | 
|      |                                              | 
|      | /s/Garth Johnson                             | 
|      | Garth Johnson, Chief
      Financial Officer | 

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

**List of Subsidiaries**

AfriSpace Kenya Ltd.—Kenya 

AfriSpace, Inc.—Maryland, US 

AmeriSpace Ltd.—British Virgin Islands—Inactive 

AsiaSpace Limited—Australia

Asiaspace, Inc. —Maryland, US—Inactive 

PT WorldSpace Indonesia—Indonesia—Inactive 

WorldSpace Spain S.A. (formerly Viatis Satellite Spain SA)—Spain 

WorldSpace (China) Information Technology Ltd.—China 

WorldSpace Argentina SA—Argentina – Inactive 

WorldSpace Asia Pte Ltd.—Singapore 

WorldSpace Caribbean Limited—Trinidad and Tobago 

WorldSpace doBrasil—Brazil—Inactive 

WorldSpace Europe Holdings ApS—Denmark (formerly Viatis Satellite Radio HoldingsApS) 

WorldSpace Europe SAS, formerly Viatis Satellite Radio Europe SAS—France 

WorldSpace France—France 

WorldSpace Ghana Ltd.—Ghana—Inactive 

WorldSpace India Private Limited—India

WorldSpace Italia SpA—Italy 

WorldSpace Middle East FZCO—Bahrain 

WorldSpace Middle East FZCO—Dubai 

WorldSpace Polska Sp. zo.o.—Poland—Inactive 

WorldSpace Radio Company Ltd.—British Virgin Islands—Inactive 

WorldSpace Satellite Company—British Virgin Islands 

WorldSpace Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd.—South Africa 

WorldSpace Systems Corporation (formerly WorldSpace Corporation and formerly WorldSpace Management Corporation)—Delaware, US 

WorldSpace UK Ltd.—United Kingdom 

XM Ventures Trust—Maryland—Inactive
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1943 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the business 

of health insurance to protect competition and consumers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2011 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to 

the business of health insurance to protect competition 

and consumers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance In5 dustry Fair Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORING THE APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST 

7 LAWS TO HEALTH SECTOR INSURERS. 

8 (a) AMENDMENT TO MCCARRAN-FERGUSON ACT.— 

9 Section 3 of the Act of March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1013), 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1943 IH

1 commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act, is 

2 amended by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(c) Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, im4 pair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust 

5 laws with respect to the business of health insurance. For 

6 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘antitrust 

7 laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 

8 first section of the Clayton Act, except that such term in9 cludes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to 

10 the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods 

11 of competition.’’. 

12 (b) RELATED PROVISION.—For purposes of section 

13 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) 

14 to the extent such section applies to unfair methods of 

15 competition, section 3(c) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act 

16 shall apply with respect to the business of health insurance 

17 without regard to whether such business is carried on for 

18 profit, notwithstanding the definition of ‘‘Corporation’’ 

19 contained in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission 

20 Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0505

_________________

JOEL WALBERG,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon review of the Appellant’s Second Motion for Additional Time for Filing 

Opening Brief, and there being no objection,

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellant is GRANTED an additional thirty (30) days from 

the original due date to file the Opening Brief. The Opening Brief will be due February 22, 

2021.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2021

01/20/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0505
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 471

- CR

Charles Bell, Jr. , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2012570 , HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS , JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant

= s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The

appeal is dismissed.

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Appellant

=

s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 20 6- CV BUI L DI NG TOM O RROW ’ S TALE NT, L L C APPE L L AN TS AND M AT T HE W GAY V . D O RI S M A RI E SI M S A N D APPELLEES SUCCE SS I ON BUI L DE RS , L L C

----- -----

FR O M THE 1 58 DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY TH

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s id e r e d t h e p a r t ie s ’“ J o in t M o t io n T o D is m is s A p p e a l.” Itis t he cou r t ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on s houl d be gr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e di sm i ss t he
a p p e a l . S eeT EX. R . A PP . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(2 ), 4 3 .2 (f). C os t s oft he app ea l s hal l be pa i d byt h e p ar t y i ncu r r i ng t he sa m e, f or
w h i c h l e t e x e c u ti o n i s s u e . S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 43. 4. P E R CU R I AM P A N E L D : M C C O Y , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d L IV IN G S T O N , J . DEL I VERE D: J un e 12, 2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04011]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this meeting is for the Civil Service 
Retirement System Board of Actuaries to review the actuarial methods 
and assumptions used in the valuations of the Civil Service Retirement 
and Disability Fund (CSRDF).

DATES: The Civil Service Retirement System Board of Actuaries plans to 
meet on Friday, May 17, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will start at 10 a.m. EDT and will be held at 
the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 1900 E Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20415.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Kissel, Senior Actuary for 
Pension Programs, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street 
NW, Room 4316, Washington, DC 20415, or by email to [email protected] or 
by phone at (202) 606-1774.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

1. Summary of Recent Legislative proposals
2. Review of Actuarial Assumptions
    a. Demographic Assumptions
    b. Economic Assumptions
3. CSRDF Annual Report

    Persons desiring to attend this meeting of the Civil Service 
Retirement System Board of Actuaries, or to make a statement for 
consideration at the meeting, should contact OPM at least 5 business 
days in advance of the meeting date at the address shown in the 
ADDRESSES section of this notice. Any detailed information or analysis 
requested for the Board to consider should be submitted at least 15 
business days in advance of the meeting date. The manner and time for 
any material presented to or considered by the Board may be limited.

Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2024-04011 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-64-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, George Kadifa, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Corio, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Corio, Inc. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Corio, Inc. and will be retained by Corio, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Date: November 12, 2004 | /s/    George
Kadifa
|----------------------- | --------------------
|                        |                     

---
#### Neil Arthur GEYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28079.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

*949Masterson, Williams & Smith, Angleton, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The transcript shows that appellant was tried before a jury. The charge appears in the record, and also an amended motion for new trial which complains of the admission of evidence within the hearing of the jury and also complains that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence in the case. However, we find in the record no verdict of the jury and no judgment based upon a jury verdict. '

The transcript contains a judgment, but it recites that it was rendered on a plea of guilty before the court, a jury 'being waived, and that the court assessed a $50 fine as punishment.

The judgment states that “the Defendant, Neil Arthur Geyer * * * pleaded guilty to D.W.L.S.”; adjudges that he is. guilty “as charged” and provides for the recovery of a $50 fine and costs.

In the absence of a proper judgment, the conviction cannot be affirmed.

This prosecution was instituted under Art. 6687b, Sec. 34, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., the complaint and information alleging that appellant did “unlawfully drive and operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway * * * *after*his, the said Neil Arthur Geyer’s license and privilege to operate a motor vehicle in the State of Texas had been canceled, suspended and revoked *and without*having obtained *a new*operator’s license, commercial license, .and chauffeur’s license.” :

We are inclined to agree with appellant’s contention that the complaint and information are. insufficient to charge the offense defined in Sec. 34 of Art. 6687b, V.A.C.S.

In Rushing v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 277 S.W.2d 104, 105, we held the complaint and information to be sufficient which alleged that the accused “ ‘did then and there unlawfully drive and operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway, there situate, when the Texas Operator’s license of said George Gordon Rushing was suspended.’ ”

We find no allegation in the present complaint or information, the effect of which is to charge that appellant drove a motor vehicle upon a public highway while, *when or during*the time his license or privilege was under suspension, revocation or cancellation. .

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution under the present complaint and information is ordered dismissed.
Exhibit 31.4


Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934


I, Craig L. Jackson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:May 1, 2017/s/ Craig L. JacksonCraig L. JacksonChief Financial Officer














1