alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John R. Cooper, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avocent Corporation onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AvocentCorporation.

 
| Date:  | May 9, 2003                                              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                     |
|   | By: /s/ John  R. Cooper                                  |   |
|   | Name: John  R. Cooper                                    |
|   | Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Douglas E. Pritchett,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AvocentCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Avocent Corporation.

 
| Date:  | May 9, 2003                                                                                                       |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                              |
|   | By: /s/  Douglas E. Pritchett                                                                                     |   |
|   | Name:  Douglas E. Pritchett                                                                                       |
|   | Title:   Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Assistant Secretary |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Bel Fuse Inc.’s Registration Statement No. 333-89376 and No. 333-65627 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Bel Fuse Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which expresses an unqualified opinion appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





New York, New York


March 11, 2011
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2021

No. 04-21-00034-CV

Kevin DUNN,

Appellant

v.

THE KADENCE COLLECTIVE, LLC,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI12519

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on or before April 23, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Fortified Holdings
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kirk Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|October 31, 2008 | By: /s/ Kirk Hanson        
|---------------- | ---------------------------
|                 | Kirk Hanson                
|                 | Principal Financial Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2040 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2040

  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2011

Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Ms. Foxx, 
    Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, and Mr. Paul) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Right-to-Work Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the ``Act'') (29 
U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ``except to'' and all that follows 
through ``authorized in section 8(a)(3)''.
    (b) Section 8(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)) is amended by 
striking ``: Provided, That'' and all that follows through ``retaining 
membership'' in paragraph (3).
    (c) Section 8(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is amended by 
striking ``or to discriminate'' and all that follows through 
``retaining membership'' in paragraph (2) and by striking ``covered by 
an agreement authorized under subsection (a)(3) of this section'' in 
paragraph (5).
    (d) Section 8(f) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is amended by 
striking clause (2) and by redesignating clauses (3) and (4) as (2) and 
(3), respectively.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

    Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) is amended by 
striking paragraph Eleventh.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4789

_____________________________

DARRELL PASCHAL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

March 9, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Darrell Paschal, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Ex parte Troy COOK.

No. 27502.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 23, 1955.

James J. Shown, Houston, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

Relator, an inmate of the penitentiary, seeks by writ of habeas corpus his release by alleging faulty cumulation of sentences against him.

It is shown that he is confined by virtue of sentences in four cases from Harris County and two cases from Waller County.

The record shows that the sentences in Cause No. 65,214 in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, and Causes Nos. 66,090, 66,091 and 66,092 in Criminal District Court No. 3 of Harris County total five years, and that after the Harris County sentences, relator was sentenced in the District Court of Waller County in Causes Nos. 3697 and 3698 to serve two years in each case, concurrent with each other; the sentence in Cause No. *3697*providing:

> “This sentence to run accumulative with sentence now serving from Harris County, Texas.”

By statement attached to the petition, it is certified by the proper penitentiary authorities that on February 6, 1955, relator had served five years, and that if the Harris and Waller County sentences were concurrent, then his sentences would be served on such date.

In Ex parte Cordes, Tex.Cr.App., 264 S.W.2d 438, a similar provision in a sentence which provided, “ ‘Defendant sentenced cumulative with sentence now serving, having been assessed in the District Court of Houston County, Texas,’ ” was held insufficient to effect cumulation.

The provision in the Waller County sentence, being ineffectual to cumulate such sentence with the Harris County sentences, the same was therefore concurrent with the Harris County sentences and, under the record, relator is entitled to his release.

The writ is granted and relator is ordered discharged from the penitentiary.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Ex parte Charles G. DAVIS.

No. 28242.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the Penitentiaries of this State, applied to the Hon. Langston King, Judge of Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was convicted in said Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County in Cause No. 68064 and assessed a two year term for theft by bailee, and on the same day was assessed a term of five years for robbery in Criminal District Court in Cause No. 68243.

Relator further alleged that the sentence in Cause No. 68243 was cumulated so as to begin at the expiration of the sentence in Cause No. *68064,*when in fact the sentence in Cause No. 68243 was pronounced before the sentence in No. 68064.

Judge King granted the writ and, certifying that he had no independent recollection of Cause No. 68064 and that Judge Williford, who presided in Cause No. 68243, is dead, made the writ returnable before this Court as provided in Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The record shows that relator was credited with time in jail in Cause No. 68064, and there is nothing, unless it be appellant’s affidavit, to show that the conviction in that cause was not in existence when sentence was pronounced by Judge Williford in Cause No. 68243. The proceedings being had on pleas of guilty on the same day, it is obvious that in the first conviction appellant was allowed credit for time in jail, and,upon the second conviction the sentence was cumulated.

The relief prayed for is denied.
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable DATE: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 TIME: Noon – 1:30 PM
Participants: EPA –Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Wendy Hoffman, Rosaura Conde, Ruth Chemerys, David Hair, Virginia Kibler, Glynis Hill, Wayne Jackson, Cheryl Atkinson, Lauren Petter, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty, George Parrish, Erin Perkins, Terrence Fleming, Phillip Woods, William Beckwith ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Alex Barron (Virginia), Connie Brower (North Carolina), Martha Clark Mettler (Indiana), Mike Tate (Kansas), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Deb Smith (California), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Susan Braley (Washington), Cheryl Niemi (Washington) Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed options derived from public comments received for WQS Variances. Agenda TOPIC TIME LEAD__________ 1. Roll Call 10 min Aguirre 2. WQS Variances 60 min Russo 3. Questions & Answers 15 min Roundtable 4. Reminders for next Roundtable meeting 5 min Aguirre
#### CITY OF SAN ANTONIO et al., Appellants, v. R. D. CRANE, Appellee.

No. 12823.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 9, 1955.

*725Carlos C. Cadena, C. J. Matthews, San Antonio, for appellant.

Montemayor & Henke, Glenn B. Lacy, San Antonio, for appellee.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

There is not an appealable judgment herein and for this reason the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

A denial of a motion for a summary judgment is not a final judgment supporting an appeal. Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Mellette v. Hudstan Oil Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 243 S.W.2d 438; F. & T. Development Co. v. Morris, Tex.Civ.App., 248 S.W.2d 233.

Inasmuch as there will no doubt be further proceedings in the trial court we will take this occasion to say that this Court, by its former opinions, Allen v. Crane, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 357, and City of San Antonio v. Crane, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W.2d 124, intended that the trial court should render a final appealable judgment in accordance with the recognized rules applicable to appeals from administrative agencies. We cited the case of Trapp v. Shell Oil Company, 145 Tex. 323, 198 S.W.2d 424, in which it was held that the judicial question generally involved is whether or not the findings of the administrative body are reasonably supported by substantial evidence. See, also, Jones v. Marsh, Tex.Civ.App., 223 S.W.2d 29, affirmed 148 Tex. 362, 224 S.W.2d 198. The Commission’s order of July 13, 1953, simply completed and gave effect to its findings of August 7, 1952. If the findings of August 7, 1952, are reasonably supported by substantial evidence and such findings as a matter' of law support Crane’s dismissal, a final judgment sustaining such dismissal should be rendered. On the other hand, if such findings are not reasonably supported by substantial evidence, the Commission’s order of dismissal should not be sustained. We call attention to the article on “Administrative Law and Procedure,” contained in Volume One of the Texas Jurisprudence Ten Year Supplement, particularly Sections 43 to 47, inclusive.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 21, 1996, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Phillips Petroleum
Company included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1995, in the following registration
statements and related prospectuses.


  Phillips Petroleum
    Company                 Form S-3     File No. 33-51559

  Phillips Petroleum
    Company                 Form S-3     File No. 33-54987

  Thrift Plan of Phillips
    Petroleum Company       Form S-8     File No. 33-50134

  Long-Term Stock Savings
    Plan of Phillips
    Petroleum Company       Form S-8     File No. 33-50283

  Retirement Savings Plan
    of Phillips Petroleum
    Company Subsidiaries    Form S-8     File No. 33-28669



                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                     
                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 21, 1996
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David A.
Gestetner, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Chairman of the
Board of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      August 12, 2009By:
                /s/
      David A. GestetnerName:
                David
      A. GestetnerTitle:
                President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Secretary,and
      Chairman of the Board(Principal
      Executive, Financial,and
      Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF EXPERTS

The Board of Directors
First Financial Bancorp:


We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements dated
April 23, 1991 on Form S-8 of First Financial Bancorp and dated June 12, 1997 on
Form S-8 of First  Financial  Bancorp of our report  dated  February  19,  1999,
relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of First  Financial  Bancorp and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1998 and 1997 and the  related  consolidated
statements of income,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1998,  which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of First Financial Bancorp.


                                                     /s/ KPMG LLP


Sacramento, California
March 26, 1999
IMAGE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC.


                          EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION


I, Barry Muradian, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Image Technology
Laboratories, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

   (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

   (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting;


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and


    (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls.






/S/ BARRY C. MURADIAN
-----------------------
BARRY C. MURADIAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

AUGUST 15, 2005




<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Illini Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe hereof (the “Report”), I Dennis B. Guthrie, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dennis  B. Guthrie |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Dennis B.  Guthrie          |
| Chief  Financial Officer    |
| March 26,  2004             |

 

1

----