alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1521 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2011 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study of the West Hunter Street Baptist 

Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Hunter Street 

5 Baptist Church Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con8 duct a special resource study of the historic West Hunter 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1521 IH

1 Street Baptist Church, located at 775 Martin Luther King 

2 Jr. Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the area as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

15 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or16 ganizations or any other interested individuals; and 

17 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

20 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

21 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec22 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5; commonly 

23 known as the ‘‘National Park Service General Authorities 

24 Act’’). 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1521 IH

1 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

2 on which funds are first made available for the study 

3 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

4 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep5 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

6 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

7 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

8 the Secretary. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001110458
<NAME> INSIGHT MIDWEST, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,868                  35,996
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,268                  15,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,250                  58,615
<PP&E>                                         725,639                 596,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,954                  87,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,686,632               1,706,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,992                 106,052
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,640                 368,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,686,632               1,706,599
<SALES>                                         92,503                  35,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,503                  35,628
<CGS>                                           31,336                  10,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,740                  40,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,699                   8,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,907)                (12,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,907)                (12,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,907)                (12,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.00


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
 
 OF
 
 ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION


Henry
C. Pao and Deborah Y. Pao certify that:


1.They are the President and
the Secretary, respectively, of Supertex, Inc., a California
corporation.


2.
Article Third of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is
amended to read as follows:


"THIRD:
This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock which
shall be designated "common"; and the total number of authorized shares that
this corporation is authorized to issue is 25,000,000.  Upon the
effective date of this Amendment of Articles of Incorporation, each of the
1,258,652 shares of stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of
this amendment, by reason of the filing of this amendment with the Secretary of
State of California, shall be split, converted and reconstituted into five (5)
shares of common stock."


3.
The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by
the board of directors.


4.
The foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of said corporation did not
require the approval of the outstanding shares of the corporation because the
amendment only effected astock split.





Dated:
April 1981


Signature8 of Art of Inc
 Deborah Y.Pao.
/Secretary











The
undersigned declare under penalty of perjury that the matters set forth in the
foregoing certificate are true of their own knowledge. Executed at Sunnyvale,
California on April 10,1981.
 i
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 202 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000 to extend and increase the authority for the ombudsman 

under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2011 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 to extend and increase 

the authority for the ombudsman under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EEOICPA Ombuds5 man Extension and Enhancement Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 202 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED AUTHORITY FOR OMBUDSMAN UNDER 

2 ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILL3 NESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 3686 of the Energy Employees Occupational 

5 Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 

6 7385s–15) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(c) DUTIES.—The duties of the Office shall be as 

10 follows: 

11 ‘‘(1) To assist individuals in making claims 

12 under this title. 

13 ‘‘(2) To provide information on the benefits 

14 available under this title and on the requirements 

15 and procedures applicable to the provision of such 

16 benefits. 

17 ‘‘(3) To act as an advocate under this title in 

18 appropriate instances, as determined by the Om19 budsman. 

20 ‘‘(4) To make recommendations to the Sec21 retary regarding the location of centers (to be known 

22 as ‘resource centers’) for the acceptance and devel23 opment of claims for benefits under this title. 

24 ‘‘(5) To carry out such other duties as the Sec25 retary shall specify.’’; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 202 IH

1 (2) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end 

2 the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(C) Proposed changes in the administra4 tive practices of the Department of Labor to 

5 mitigate difficulties identified under subpara6 graph (B) and potential legislative changes 

7 which may be appropriate to mitigate such dif8 ficulties.’’; and 

9 (3) by striking subsection (g) (establishing a 

10 sunset date) and inserting the following: 

11 ‘‘(g) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—The Ombudsman 

12 shall have authority to hire or contract for any supplies 

13 or services including the services of individuals with exper14 tise in relevant disciplines, including health physics, medi15 cine, industrial hygiene, and toxicology, as the Ombuds16 man may from time to time consider appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief
Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report
of New World Batteries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Patrick OBrien, Chief Financial Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|             |                                                             
|------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------
|May 30, 2006 | /s/ Patrick O'Brien
Patrick O'Brien
 Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, John H. Curtis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 9,  2005 |   | /s/John H. Curtis             |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                        |   | **John H.  Curtis**           |
|                        |   | ***Chief Executive Officer*** |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                                IDI Global, Inc.

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of IDI Global, Inc. (the "Company") certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.       the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: August 15, 2005         /s/ Kevin R. Griffith
                              Kevin R. Griffith
                              Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 15, 2005         /s/ Steven D. Weatherly
                              Steven D. Weatherly
                              Principal Financial Officer
# U nit edStates C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 03-1470 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . ROBERT C. LUISI, JR., Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on April 10, 2007 is amended as follows: On page 13, footnote 8, line 8: Replace the word "where" with the word "were." On page 20, line 15: Replace the citation "494-5" with the citation "494-95." On page 21, line 2: Delete the period directly following the number "8," and replace it with a semicolon. Delete one of the two spaces before "Cf." Replace the capitalized "Cf." with the lowercase "cf."
Fallon, Gail 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Bachman, Tom A. [tbachman@nd.gov] 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:16PM 

Fallon, Gail 

Subject: RE: Enforcement of NDIC rules 

Gail: 

The law and rule you cited are enforced by the NO Industrial Commission, Oil and Gas 

Division. The requirement to sell or beneficially use the gas after one year probably 

does reduce emissions. Our oil and gas people indicate 85°/o of the Bakken wells are 

tied into a gas gathering line during the first year of operation. This rule probably has a 

lot to do with it. An estimate of the amount of emissions avoided from not flaring is 

difficult since the well's production declines rapidly during the first year. The sooner 

the well is tied into the gathering line- the greater the amount of emissions avoided. 

The safety rule probably has no effect on emissions. 

I don't have any insight into the NDIC enforcement of the law and safety rule. 

Regarding our proposed rule change, I think the "absurd results" and "administrative 

necessary" doctrines could be argued just like EPA did for GHGs under PSD and Title 

V (Tailoring rule). The additional number of sources that would require permitting 

under Subpart 0000 and MACT Subpart JJJJJJ would overwhelm our program. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 

Tom Bachman, P.E. 

Manager; Air Quality 

Impact Analysis Program 

NO Dept. of Health 

(701) 328-5188 

From: Fallon, Gail [mailto:fallon.gail@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 6:57 PM 

To: Bachman, Tom A. 

Subject: Enforcement of NDIC rules 

Hi Tom- Hopefully just one more thing for today! Can you explain anything about how ND enforces the below rules? 

Do you have any thoughts or data on whether these rules would help ND with minimizing emissions? 

North Dakota Industrial Commission 

1 
(NDIC) 

North Dakota Century Code Chapter 38-08 

Control of Oil and Gas Resources: Article 

38-08-06.4. Flaring of Gas RestrictedImposition of Tax- Payment of 

Royalties - Industrial Commission 

Authority; and Article 43-02-03-28 

Safety Regulation. 

Thanks! 

Gail Fallon 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

US EPA, Region 8 

Denver, CO 

(303) 312-6281 

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

HIDDEN CREEK, L.P., 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LOWER SALFORD TOWNSHIP 

AUTHORITY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 920 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

0610 

Order 

 

June 17, 2009 

138030 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138030 

 COA: 285585 

Wayne CC: 07-100097 

BRIAN STOKES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas G. Bryant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  May 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Douglas G. Bryant                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                     |  | Douglas G. Bryant
Chief Financial Officer
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Department of Highways, ex rel. W. P. CURLIN, Commissioner of Highways, and Graves County, Appellants, v. Robert SCHOFIELD et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 20, 1955.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., C. J. Waddill, Asst. Atty. Gen., T. W. Johnson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Malcolm R. Boaz, County Atty., Mayfield, for appellants.

Robbins & Cross, Mayfield, for appellees.

CAMMACK, Judge.

This is another condemnation case instituted in the Graves County Court by the Commonwealth to condemn property for its proposed highway between Mayfield and Fulton. The appellees herein were awarded. $2,500 by a judgment in the Graves County Court entered on June 21, 1954.

As in the case of Commonwealth ex rel. Curlin v. Taylor, Ky., 279 S.W.2d 813, the appellants filed with the Graves Circuit Court a statement of appeal from the judgment of the county court, together with a certified copy of the judgment and their exceptions to the award. The summonses on the appeal were issued at the same time they were issued in the Taylor case, after some 95 days had elapsed. The appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal to the circuit court was sustained by the circuit court for the same reason the appeal was dismissed in the Taylor case.

Since the same question is involved, what was said in the Taylor case is decisive of the question in this case. For the reasons stated therein, the judgment is reversed, with directions to set it aside, and for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-147570 and 333-149806) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-147569 and 333-147758) of
InfoLogix, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2007, except for the classification of certain amounts in revenues and costs of sales, which date is March 27, 2008, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of InfoLogix, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
ASHER & COMPANY, Ltd.

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
April 15, 2009

---



QuickLinks
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DORAN LEVELLE MORAGNE, ) DOC #R60304, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2373 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 22, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joseph N. D'Achille, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### Faye E. McFARLAND, Appellant, v. A. R. McFARLAND.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 17, 1955.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, R. B. Bertram, Monticello, for appellant.

J. C. Denney, Jr., Monticello, for appel-lee.

CAMMACK, Judge.

This is an appeal by Faye E. McFarland from a judgment denying her claim for one-half of the profits for a period of several weeks in 1954 allegedly obtained by A. R. McFarland, her husband, from the operation of a business owned by them.

In 1951 the appellant and appellee, as man and wife, began the operation of a business in Pulaski County where they s'old live bait and other equipment and supplies to' fishermen. They continued to operate the business until May 4, 1954. At that time they separated because of- marital difficulties. On July 5, 1954, the appellant was granted a divorce. The property in question was sold pursuant to an order of the court on July 16,, 1954.- - ,

During the period from May 4 to July 16, the business was in the exclusive control of the appellee. In an effort to determine the profits derived from the operation of the business during that period, the court permitted proof to be introduced on the question. The trial judge entered a judgment stating that he was unable to determine from the proof whether there was a profit or loss and entered judgment denying the appellant’s claim'.

The appellant introduced a profit and loss statement of the' business for the period of May 5, 1953 to July 16, 1953, which showed a net profit of $6,998.12. The appellee submitted a financial statement of an auditor covering the - period from May 5, 1954, to July 15, 1954, which showed a net loss of $2,051.53 in the operation of the business.

 Since the adoption of the present Rules of Civil Procedure we have written many times that in a case tried upon its facts without a jury, findings of - fact .of the trial judge will not be set aside unless *714they are clearly' erroneous. CR 52.01; Stone v. Stone, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 910; Keesee v. Maynard, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 921. We think there was sufficient proof to support the judgment under consideration.

Judgment affirmed.