alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2149 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 210
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2149

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            October 19, 2011

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CECIL L. HEFTEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cecil L. 
Heftel Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 210

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2149

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 19, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2075 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2075

  To require that spent nuclear fuel be stored in certified dry cask 
                    storage, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2011

   Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Markey, Ms. Berkley, and Mrs. Lowey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that spent nuclear fuel be stored in certified dry cask 
                    storage, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dry Cask Storage Act''.

SEC. 2. DRY CASK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE.

    (a) Requirement.--Not later than 1 year after the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission designates spent nuclear fuel contained in 
storage pools as qualified to be placed in dry cask storage certified 
by the Commission, such spent nuclear fuel shall be moved from such 
pools and placed in certified dry casks.
    (b) Costs of Compliance.--The Secretary of Energy shall determine 
the costs required for compliance with subsection (a) by the owner of 
spent nuclear fuel, and shall reduce by that amount the amount due from 
that owner pursuant to section 302 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 
1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222).
                                 <all>
```
#### ASHCRAFT v. STATE.

No. 26816.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.-

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-11-00771-CR

Rene Daniel VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2111

Honorable Mark R. Luitjen,

1 Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

MODIFIED to correct a clerical error and to reflect that appellant Rene Daniel Villarreal was 

convicted of murder pursuant to section 19.02(b)(2) of the Texas Penal Code. As modified, we 

AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

1 Sitting by assignment.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Name of Committee: Safety and Occupational Health Study Section 
(SOHSS), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
    Dates: June 4-5, 2024.
    Times: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: The meeting will convene to address matters related to the 
conduct of Study Section business and for the Study Section to consider 
safety and occupational health-related grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 
26506. Telephone: (304) 285-5951; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#276a60484b4344464a576744434409404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2469634b484047454954644740470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-04200 Filed 2-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Amendmentto Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Summer Infant, Inc.

 

2.Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report.

 
| April 30,  2009 | /s/  JASON  MACARI |
|----------------------|------------------------------|
|                 |                         |
|                 | Jason  Macari                |
| * *             | *Chief Executive Officer*    |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Seifi Ghasemi,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March16, 2007

 
| /s/ SEIFI GHASEMI                     |
|---------------------------------------|
| Seifi  Ghasemi                        |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2154

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
            Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2011

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
            Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Gasparilla Island Unit FL-
70P'' included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to the Gasparilla Island Unit in 
Florida is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same unit 
entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Corrected 
Gasparilla Unit FL-70P'' and dated ____.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF TRUE HEALTH, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,781
<PP&E>                                           2,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,418)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       606,098
<OTHER-SE>                                    (688,927)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,498
<SALES>                                         20,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,575
<CGS>                                            4,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,162)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>
AFS-13-228-P

March 11, 2014

Mr. Ben Kadrlik

Regulatory Specialist

Chart SeQual Technologies, Inc.

2200 Airport Industrial Drive, Suite 500

Ball Ground, GA 30107

Dear Mr. Kadrlik:

This letter is in response to your letter sent to the public docket dated February 7, 2013

(Docket No. FAA-2013-0157) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of 

Chart SeQual Technologies, Inc. (SeQual) to amend part 121, Special Federal Aviation 

Regulation (SFAR) 106 of Title 14, Code of Regulation (14 CFR) to include SeQual’s 

eQuinox Oxygen System (model 4000) as one of the approved portable oxygen concentrators 

(POCs) devices for use on passenger aircraft.

On February 3, 2014, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 121, SFAR 106 related to POCs

(79 FR 6078). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information. 

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Thuy H. Cooper

Acting Manager, Airman and 

Airspace Rules Division
EXHIBIT 15



Acknowledgement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in



(i)

Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-73803), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Employee Savings and Retirement Plan,



(ii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-50841) and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59602), each of which relate to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,



(iii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59101), which relates to the Voluntary Investment Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (Crystal Brands Division),



(iv)

Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-72959), Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-64564) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 2-47910), each of which relate to the 1973 Employees Stock Option Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation,



(v)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38698), Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-24057) and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-60793), each of which relate to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan,



(vi)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-29765), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan,



(vii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-41068), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan,



(viii)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-109000), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan, and



(ix)

Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-125694), which relates to the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation Associates Investment Plan for Salaried Associates, Associates Investment Plan for Hourly Associates and Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico



of our report dated May 23, 2006 with respect to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q/A for the thirteen week period ended April 30, 2006.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part of the registration statements or post-effective amendments prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York

August 10, 2006
EXHIBIT 32

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


Exhibit 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Jointland  Development,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Kexi Xu,
Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007


/s/ Kexi Xu
---------------------
Kexi Xu,
Acting Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

1 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUN 22 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-3301

(D.C. No. 95-CR-10033

 &

97-3331-MLB)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , LOGAN , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

Defendant seeks review of the district court’s order denying his motion to

modify, vacate, or set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 1

 Before

defendant may proceed on appeal, however, he must secure a certificate of

appealability from this court, which requires “a substantial showing of the denial
-2-

of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Based upon our review of the

record as a whole, we conclude that defendant has failed to make such a showing.

Defendant’s motion to file a reply brief is GRANTED, with the exception

of those attachments to the brief that were not before the district court.

Defendant’s application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the

appeal is DISMISSED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00160-CV

Eugene Saunders, Appellant

v.

Justin Mayers, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-20-002978, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on April 12, 

2021. The Clerk of this Court subsequently notified appellant that the clerk’s record had 

not been filed and was overdue, and that notice had been received from the district clerk 

that appellant had neither paid, nor made arrangements for payment, for the clerk’s record. 

The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a 

status report regarding this appeal by May 24, 2021. Further, the notice advised appellant

that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of his appeal for want 

of prosecution.

To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this 

Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
2

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 28, 2021
#### Frank Allen LEARY, Appellant, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY.

No. 10975.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 12, 1937.

David M. Proctor, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

R. H. Hudson and R. L. Foster, both of Bartlesville, Okl., and H. H. Booth and J. H. Snyder, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.