alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 28, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 28, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0447. OLD FOURTH FORWARD, LLC v. TRINTEC PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On October 28, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than November 07, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of Chestatee Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Deborah F. McLeod,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(i)  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 13, 2007       BY: /s/ Deborah F. McLeod
       -----------------           --------------------------------------------
                                   Deborah F. McLeod, C.F.O. and Treasurer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
2008-2013 HCFC-22 Aggregate Inventory Data

March 27, 2014

Amount of virgin and reclaimed HCFC-22 owned and held in inventory (as of December 31 of each 

year) in metric tons (MT), as reported by nine entities in the HCFC-22 market. 

Aggregate HCFC-22 Inventory (MT)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

58,464 62,120 63,143 61,968 51,124 53,925

EPA requested HCFC-22 inventory data from 2008-2012 in August 2013. In February 2014, EPA asked 

the same nine entities for their HCFC-22 inventory at the end of 2013. Both of these requests were under 

the authority of section 114 of the Clean Air Act. The nine entities comprise major producers, importers, 

distributors and reclaimers of HCFC-22.
#### Ex parte Johnny SALAZAR.

No. 27353.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

*701Calamia & Chew, by Joseph A. Calamia, El Paso, for appellant.

Travis White, City Atty., El Paso, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The relator was convicted in the Corporation Court of the City of El Paso under a complaint charging that he went into a public place while under the influence of a narcotic drug, as such drug is defined by Art. 725b, of the Penal Code of the State of Texas, in violation of the Narcotics Ordinance of the City of El Paso.

The ordinance under which relator was charged makes it unlawful to be on a public street or in a public place under the influence of any narcotic drug and, for its violation, fixes a penalty by fine not exceeding $200.

Relator’s sole contention is that said ordinance is void because it is in conflict with Art. 725c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which prohibits the same act for which relator was here convicted under said ordinance, in that it prescribes a different and lesser punishment than that fixed by said statute.

We held in Ex parte Levinson, Tex.Cr. App., 274 S.W.2d 76, that Art. 725c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., was void.

In view of our holding in Ex parte Lev-inson, supra, the ordinance relating to the particular matter here charged in the complaint and upon which relator was convicted is not in conflict with the state law and, therefore, said ordinance is not subject to the attack here made on its validity.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the relator is ordered remanded to custody.

Opinion approved by the Court.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: June 25, 2015 519628 

________________________________

In the Matter of WILLIE JAMES,

Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision, 

et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: May 5, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

__________

Willie James, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County)

to, among other things, review a determination of respondent

Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found

petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 519628 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
---

Exhibit 32.1

****

****

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lewis Dillman, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.
      for the annual period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Sun Cal Energy, Inc.                                                                      

Dated: October 12, 2007





*/s/ Lewis Dillman*
  Lewis Dillman 
  Chief Executive Officer 
  (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sun Cal Energy,
Inc. and will be retained by Sun Cal Energy, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Glenn L. MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27487.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 16, 1955.

*303No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of whiskey, wine, beer and gin for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $300.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### TUCKER v. STATE.

No. 26541.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of burglary, and his punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### OSTEOPATHIC SANITORIUM CO., Appellant, v. Carolyn G. STEVENS.

No. 10969.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 3, 1937.

S. H. Ellison and Arthur Campbell, both of Kirksville, Mo., Roy Hamlin, of Hannibal, Mo., and Waldo Edwards, George N. Davis, and Charles W. Shelton, all of Macon, Mo., for appellant.

C. E. Schindler, of Louisville, Ky., and Rendlen, White & Rendlen, of Hannibal, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed at costs of appellant, but without taxation of statutory attorney’s docket fee in this court, pursuant to stipulation of parties.
#### L. C. FERRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28304.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1956.

No. attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Henry M. Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., Geo. P. Blackburn, Lancaster Smith, Asst. Criminal Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, 'State’s Atty., Austin, for the 'State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is rape; the punishment, 45 years in the penitentiary.

'fhe record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1922 

To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access to Federal 

lands to carry out certain security activities in the Southwest border 

region, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2011 

Mr. QUAYLE (for himself, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GOSAR, 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. KING of New York, and Mrs. MILLER of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland 

Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with access 

to Federal lands to carry out certain security activities 

in the Southwest border region, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER SECURITY ON CERTAIN FEDERAL 

4 LANDS. 

5 (a) SUPPORT FOR BORDER SECURITY.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

7 provision of law, U.S. Customs and Border ProtecVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:42 May 25, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1922.IH H1922

jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1922 IH

1 tion shall have access to Federal lands for security 

2 activities, including— 

3 (A) routine motorized patrols; and 

4 (B) the deployment of temporary tactical 

5 infrastructure. 

6 (2) OPERATION.—The security activities de7 scribed in paragraph (1) shall be conducted, to the 

8 maximum extent practicable, in a manner that the 

9 Secretary of Homeland Security determines will best 

10 protect the natural and cultural resources on Fed11 eral lands. 

12 (b) LIMITATION REGARDING INTERMINGLED PRI13 VATE AND STATE LAND.—This section shall not apply to 

14 any private or State-owned land within the boundaries of 

15 Federal lands. 

16 (c) FEDERAL LANDS DEFINED.—In this section, the 

17 term ‘‘Federal lands’’ includes all land, including a compo18 nent of the National Wilderness Preservation System, 

19 under the control of any Federal department or agency 

20 with legal jurisdiction over such land that is located within 

21 150 miles of the Southwest border region. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Sign:                                  | /S/ | Richard A. Smith |   |
|----------------------------------------|-----|------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| May 12,  2006                     |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Reportor as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
**ACCOUNTANT'S
      AWAR** **ENESS
      LETTER**














Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W.


Washington,
      D.C. 20549








We
      are
      aware that our report dated May 3, 2007 on our review of the interim financial
      statements of I-trax, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and for the
      three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 and included in Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended March 31, 2007 is incorporated by reference in the Company’s
      Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-110891 and 333-114604) and on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-125685). Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933,
      this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statements
      prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
      Act.











**GOLDSTEIN
      GOLUB KESSLER LLP**


New
      York,
      New York





May
      10,
      2007
Exhibit     32.1          Certification.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of UCELLIT.COM INC. pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.
I,  Mark  Epstein, the Chief Executive Officer of UCELLIT.COM INC hereby certify
that  UCELLIT.COM  INC.  's  periodic  report  on  Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)
and  that  information  contained  in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the
financial  statements  contained  therein  fairly  represents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial condition and results of the operations of UCELLIT.COM
INC.

Date:  December 22, 2003
(signed)____________________
Mark Epstein
/s/  Mark Epstein
Chief Executive Officer
Of UCELLIT.COM INC.




<PAGE>
**ATTACHMENT G**  **Display Related to OMB Control #2070 -** **005 2**  **- Listings of** 

**Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1** As of May

10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the following regulations: Program Title 40 CFR citation Packaging Requirements for Pesticides and Devices ................................ ............................. 157.22

................................ ................................ ..................... 157.24

................................ ................................ ..................... 157.34

................................ ................................ ..................... 157.36
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel L. CHEATHAM, a/k/a Skeet, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4272.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.

Decided Aug. 21, 2002.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Edwin C. Walker, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly A. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Cheatham appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release *626and resulting sixty month sentence. Cheatham acknowledges he violated the terms of his supervised release but asserts his sixty-month sentence was excessive and plainly unreasonable. Finding no error, we affirm.

We review the reasonableness of a revocation sentence for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Davis,*53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir.1995). The recommended guidelines range for Cheatham’s sentence was eight to fourteen months. *See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manuel*§ 7B1.4(a), p.s. (2000).

We find, however, the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Cheatham to the statutory maximum sentence of sixty months. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000). The sentencing ranges contained in Chapter Seven of the Guidelines are “non-binding, advisory guides to district courts in supervised release revocation proceedings.” *Davis,*53 F.3d at 642. Once a district court considers Chapter Seven’s policy statements, the court is free to exercise its discretion to reject the suggested sentence and impose the statutorily authorized sentence it deems appropriate. *Id.*at 642-43. Because the district court considered the relevant factors in sentencing Cheatham, we find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed.

Accordingly, we affirm Cheatham’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancorp (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.



|                      |  |                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr.                                                           
|                      |  | Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|     1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Segway IV Corp., Inc. |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   November 15, 2010                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Donny Smith                                                        |
| Donny SmithPresident, CEO, CFO, Secretary and Director  |