alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 2 0

- 00 552

- C V



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ARACELI CASTILLO

, Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

TRUST COMPANY

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 165th District Court

of Harris C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

Appellant Ar aceli Castillo appealed a judgment rendered against her and in favor

of appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in a matter involving the2 enforcement of a foreign judgment. 1 See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . §§ 35.001

–

.008 (codifying the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act). The parties to this

appeal have now filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that they have

settled and compromised their differences in this matter.

The parties’ agreed mo tion to dismiss requests relief that is allowed by t he

appellate rules. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1) (allowing the court to “dismiss the appeal

or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless such disposition would prevent a party

from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled”) . Accordingly, we grant the

agreed motion to dismiss

, and we dismiss the appeal. Costs will be taxed against the

appellant. See id . R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs

against the appellant.”)

. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion

for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

1st day of April, 202 1

.

1 Th e appeal was transferred to this Court from the F irst Court of Appeals in Houston pursuant to

a docket equalization order issued by the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE A NN . §§ 73.001

, 22.220(a)

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000729209
<NAME>     Boettcher Venture Capital Partners, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         13,770
<SECURITIES>                                  821,584         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,066,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52,515
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,013,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,013,539
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              115,201
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 186,070 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (70,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (70,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               659,889
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  589,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

_______________

No. 93-5376

_______________

JILL BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BRYAN COUNTY OK, ET AL, 

Defendants,

BRYAN COUNTY OK and STACEY BURNS,

Defendants-Appellants

Cross-Appellees,

_____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

____________________________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

July 3, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit

Judges.

ORDER:

The above case, which can be found at 67 F.3d, 1174 was

reversed by the Supreme Court. Our judgment was vacated and the

same was remanded. We in turn remand the same to the District

Court for the Eastern District of Texas, from whence it came, for

consideration in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Exhibit     32.1          Certification.
Certification  of  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  UCELLIT.COM  INC. pursuant to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.
I, Mark Epstein, the Chief Executive Officer of UCELLIT.COM INC  hereby certify
that  UCELLIT.COM  INC.  's  periodic  report  on  Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)
and  that  information  contained  in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the
financial  statements  contained  therein  fairly  represents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial condition and results of the operations of UCELLIT.COM
INC.

Date:  December  22,  2003
(signed)____________________
Mark  Epstein
/s/  Mark  Epstein
Chief  Executive  Officer
Of  UCELLIT.COM  INC.


<PAGE>
#### ASHFORD v. STATE.

No. 26579.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., and George Seale, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, *847Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular. The .record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court. -
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules 49249 

new comment period ends on January 

24, 2014. 

David M. Capozzi, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19595 Filed 8–12–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8150–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

45 CFR Part 98 

Child Care and Development Fund 

(CCDF) Program; Reopening of 

Comment Period 

AGENCY: Administration for Children 

and Families, Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Administration for 

Children and Families within the U.S. 

Department of Health and Human 

Services (HHS) is reopening and 

extending the period to submit 

comments on the proposed rule for the 

Child Care and Development Fund 

(CCDF), published in the Federal 

Register of May 20, 2013. The proposed 

rule makes changes to the CCDF 

regulatory provisions in order to 

strengthen health and safety 

requirements for child care providers, 

reflect current State and local practices 

to improve the quality of child care, 

infuse new accountability for Federal 

tax dollars, and leverage the latest 

knowledge and research in the field of 

early care and education to better serve 

low-income children and families. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

proposed rule that published May 20, 

2013 (78 FR 29441), is reopened. 

Comments will be received through 

August 23, 2013. To receive 

consideration comments must be 

received no later than 11:59 p.m. E.D.T. 

on that date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit written 

comments to the following address: 

Office of Child Care, 370 L’Enfant 

Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20024, 

Attention: Cheryl Vincent, Office of 

Child Care, or electronically via the 

Internet at: http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cheryl Vincent, Office of Child Care, 

202–205–0750 (not a toll-free call). Deaf 

and hearing impaired individuals may 

call the Federal Dual Party Relay 

Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 

a.m. and 7 p.m. Eastern Time. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HHS 

published a proposed rule for the Child 

Care and Development Fund (CCDF) in 

the Federal Register on May 20, 2013 

(78 FR 29441) with a deadline for public 

comments on April 5, 2013 by 11:59 

p.m. E.D.T. The Web site for submitting 

public comments, http:// 

www.regulations.gov, experienced 

technical difficulties and was 

unavailable for periods of time during 

the several days prior to this deadline 

and many commenters reported 

difficulty submitting their comments 

using this mechanism. In addition, the 

site was shut down for maintenance at 

6 p.m. E.D.T. on Monday, August 5th 

shortening the time allowed for 

submitting public comment. Therefore, 

HHS is re-opening the comment period 

for 10 days to ensure all interested 

parties have an opportunity to submit 

comment on the proposed rule. 

Dated: August 9, 2013. 

Kathleen Sebelius, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19704 Filed 8–12–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–28–P 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.




Dated:
              March 17,
              2008By:
            /s/
              Colin DunnColin
                Dunn, Vice President -
              Finance
                and Secretary
Date:
        April 11, 2006
 Michael
        T. Williams
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  Exhibit
        32
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the annual report of Smitten Press: Local Lore and Legends
        Inc.
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Michael T. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to
        the
        best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Michael
        T. Williams
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  April
        11,
        2006
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Nick N. Feizy, Appellant

No. 06-14-00230-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

4 of Collin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 004-

80265-2014). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Nick N. Feizy, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 2, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Gaylon E. Martin, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Illini Corporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in the annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date:  | March 29, 2005                   |   | /s/ Gaylon E. Martin |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Gaylon E. Martin                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
jill-ex1024_829.htm



Exhibit 10.24



November 8, 2018

Brian Beitler
7829 Lambton Park Road
New Albany, OH 43054

Dear Brian:

Reference is made to your offer letter from J.Jill, Inc. (“J.Jill”), dated August 2, 2018 (your “Offer Letter”).  Capitalized terms contained herein but not defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Offer Letter.  The purpose of this letter (this “Letter”) is to amend the terms of your Offer Letter.  If you agree to the amendment terms described below, please sign and date this Letter where indicated below and return a signed copy to me no later November 15, 2018.

On the next regular payroll date of J.Jill, in lieu of any right that you had pursuant to the Offer Letter to receive an Annual Bonus for J.Jill’s 2018 fiscal year, you will receive a one-time sign-on bonus equal to $123,577.00 (the “Sign-On Bonus”), less applicable tax withholdings.  You will again be eligible to earn an Annual Bonus pursuant to the “Bonus” paragraph in your Offer Letter beginning in fiscal year 2019.

If, prior to the last day of fiscal year 2018, you resign without Good Reason or J.Jill terminates your employment with Cause, you agree to repay the gross amount of the Sign-On Bonus to J.Jill promptly following such termination.

Except as amended by this Letter, the terms and conditions of your Offer Letter are confirmed, approved, and ratified, and your Offer Letter, as amended by this Letter, shall continue in full force and effect.  Any reference in any other document to your Offer Letter shall mean your Offer Letter as amended by this Letter.

Sincerely,

J.Jill, Inc.

By:  /s/ Gloria Guerrera
Name:  Gloria Guerrera
Title:  Vice President, Human Resources

Accepted and Agreed to:

/s/ Brian Beitler
Brian Beitler

 

Doc#: US1:12407897v1
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable

DATE: Tuesday, April 15, 2014

TIME: Noon – 1:30 PM

Participants:

EPA –Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Wendy Hoffman,

Rosaura Conde, Ruth Chemerys, David Hair, Virginia Kibler, Glynis Hill, Wayne Jackson,

Cheryl Atkinson, Lauren Petter, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty,

George Parrish, Erin Perkins, Terrence Fleming, Phillip Woods, William Beckwith

ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Alex Barron (Virginia), Connie Brower (North

Carolina), Martha Clark Mettler (Indiana), Mike Tate (Kansas), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah

Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Deb Smith (California), Nancy Sonafrank

(Alaska), Susan Braley (Washington), Cheryl Niemi (Washington)

Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed options derived from public comments received

for WQS Variances.

Agenda

TOPIC TIME LEAD__________

1. Roll Call 10 min Aguirre

2. WQS Variances 60 min Russo

3. Questions & Answers 15 min Roundtable

4. Reminders for next Roundtable meeting 5 min Aguirre
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                                     |  |                                  |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -
|Name and State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation                |  | RegistrantsPercentage Ownership |  
|U. S. Subsidiaries                                                   |  |                                  |  
|C/P Products Corp, an Indiana corporation                            |  | 100                              | %
|United Sales and Warehouse of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation       |  | 100                              | %
|Foreign Subsidiaries:                                                |  |                                  |  
|The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc., Quebec, Canada          |  | 100                              | %
|Ai-wek a.k.a Eurasia Recreational Vehicle Accessories Taiwan Company |  | 100                              | %



In accordance with the
instructions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted those subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2003.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                              28,190
<SECURITIES>                         1,366
<RECEIVABLES>                       11,880
<ALLOWANCES>                         1,020
<INVENTORY>                         11,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    54,718
<PP&E>                              34,221
<DEPRECIATION>                      18,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      74,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               11,909
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                            20,895
<OTHER-SE>                          41,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        74,589
<SALES>                             50,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    50,721
<CGS>                               28,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       45,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      7,144
<INCOME-TAX>                         1,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  5,334
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         5,334
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.44


</TABLE>
#### Ida Mae SPEED v. STATE.

No. 26707.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, five years.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form, executed by appellant, requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlb OF MONTANA DA 20-0172 SHANELLE J. VAN DYKE,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. DAVID ALLEN WARD,

Respondent and Appellant. 

# FILED MAR 26 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Pursuantto Appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED this day ofMarch,2020. For the Court,
ChiefJustice 03/27/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0172
#### Ex parte Wynona Pearl HEMMI.

No. 27228.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court remanding appellant to the custody of the arresting officer to answer a charge of robbery by firearms in the State of Oklahoma.

We have examined the record and fail to find any irregularities therein.

It appears that appellant sued out this writ under the theory that there were pending in this state accusations against her which precluded her extradition. Upon the hearing, it was made to appear that all such claimed accusations had been dismissed and were no longer pending against her.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2014-0472

Docket Number

2013-SW-040-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Agusta Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 109EP-128, Revision A, dated May 28, 2013.

Agusta BT No. 109K-57, Revision A, dated May 28, 2013.

Agusta BT No. 119-058, Revision A, dated May 28, 2013.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.