alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MEMORANDUM**

**TO:** Formaldeh yd e Work Group **FROM:** Rebecca Edelstein , EPA/OPPT/EETD **DATE:** February

23, 2011 **SUBJECT:** List of Urea - Formaldeh yde Resin Substitutes The purpose of this document is to identify chemicals that should be assessed for hazard and exposure based on publicly available information and input from public meetings, the California Air Resource Board (CARB), and ANPR comments on potential substitut es. Stakeholders from industry as well as CARB have stated that the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) is technology

forcing; therefore, new technologies will likely be developed in the next few y ears that are not discussed in this document. The ty pe of resin used to manufacture pressed wood products greatly affects the amount of formaldeh yde released. Therefore, most technologies designed to limit formaldehyde emissions focus on alternative resins. Different resins that are expected to be used to limit the emissions of formaldeh yde from the three pressed - wood products regulated under the CARB ATCM are listed below: Hardwood Pl ywood (HWPW)  Urea - formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine (1,3,5 - triazine - 2,4,6 - triamine)  Poly vinyl Acetate (PVA)  PVA - Soy  Phenol - formaldeh yde (PF)  Poly amide - soy

— based on the combination of a poly amide epichlorohydrin combined with soy

flour Particleboard (PB)  Urea - formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine  Urea - formaldehyde (UF) + Scavengers  Phenol - formaldeh yde (PF)  Melamine - Formaldeh yde (MF) + Scavengers  Cashew nut shell liquid resin Medium Density

Fiberboard (MDF)  Urea - formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine  Urea - formaldehyde (UF) + Scavengers  Poly methylene diphenyl diisocy anate (pMDI)  Melamine - Formaldeh yde (MF) + Scavengers Likel y scavengers, additives, and cross linking agents that may be added to the resins include: urea, ammonia, phenol, tannins, soy protein (hy droly sates and meal), melamine, hexamethylenetetraamine (commonly referred to as hexamine), sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, triace tin (gl yc erol triacetate), tris(hy drox ym ethyl) nitromethane, and chromium complexes. Public comments from members of the pressed wood industry indicate that these substitutes have a number of limitations (both cost and performance), but that the industry is committed to meeting the CARB ATCM phase 2 limits and is working on resolving the cost and performance issues. Information provided by CARB in a teleconference (July 29, 2009) and on its website on approved no added formaldeh yde (NAF) and ultra - low emi tting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins indicates that the alternative resins and scavengers listed above are consistent with what industry is currentl y using in certain products to meet the CARB ATCM limits.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIUS L. ALLEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 620 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MADISON GARRAWAY NO. 2022 CW 0818

VERSUS

JAMEE RAYE ALLEN AND FORD AUGUST 2. 2022

MOTOR COMPANY

In Re: Hilda Lou Byargeon, in her capacity as the Curatrix of

Madison Garraway, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 631668. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to include a copy of

the district court' s judgment, order or ruling complained of and

the pertinent minute entry in violation of Rule 4- 5( C)( 6) and

10) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules

of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 and 4- 9. 

VGW

JMG

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

ui• 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
October 27, 2015

Ms. Mary Kennedy

RLS

EPS Group, Inc.

2045 South Vineyard Avenue, Suite 101

Mesa, AZ 85210

Dear Ms. Kennedy:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 18, 2015, exemption request on behalf of EPS Group, Inc. filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−3268, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1989 

To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and Santa 

Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws of 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2011 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in 

Pima and Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining 

and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Arizona Pub5 lic Lands Protection Act of 2011’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1989 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LANDS AND INTERESTS 

2 LOCATED IN PIMA AND SANTA CRUZ COUN3 TIES, ARIZONA. 

4 Subject to valid existing rights, after the date of en5 actment of this Act— 

6 (1) all federally owned interests in National 

7 Forest lands in Santa Cruz County and Pima Coun8 ty, Arizona, are withdrawn from— 

9 (A) all forms of entry, appropriation, and 

10 disposal under the public land laws; 

11 (B) location, entry, and patent under the 

12 mining laws; and 

13 (C) operation of the mineral leasing and 

14 geothermal leasing laws, and the mineral mate15 rials laws; 

16 (2) all federally owned subsurface interests 

17 under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau 

18 of Land Management in lands in Pima County, Ari19 zona, with respect to which the surface interests are 

20 owned by such county, including in such lands lo21 cated in Davidson Canyon, are withdrawn from— 

22 (A) all forms of entry, appropriation and 

23 disposal under the public land laws; 

24 (B) location, entry, and patent under the 

25 mining laws; and 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1989 IH

1 (C) operation of the mineral leasing and 

2 geothermal leasing laws, and the mineral mate3 rials laws; and 

4 (3) all federally owned interests in Bureau of 

5 Land Management lands in Pima County, Arizona, 

6 are withdrawn from entry, location, or patent under 

7 the general mining laws. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Petroleum Company as of
June 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statement of income
for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,191
<PP&E>                                          26,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,792
<BONDS>                                          7,319
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              650
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           371
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,264
<SALES>                                         10,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,202
<CGS>                                            8,011<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,184<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                       738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       692
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.71
<FN>
<F1> Purchased crude oil and products + Production and operating expenses +
     Exploration expenses + Depreciation, depletion and amortization.
<F2> CGS + Taxes other than income taxes.
<F3> Preferred dividend requirements of capital trusts.
</FN>




</TABLE>
--DRAFT ONLY--


RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS 

 

OF 

 

TOKEN COMMUNITIES LTD. 

 

 

 

The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 2nd day of April, 2019; 

  

WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to elect a new Director, CEO, Vice Chair & CFO of the Company; 

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected: 

 

MANICKHAM MAHALINGAM as Director, and Chairman of the Board; 

LALIT VERMA as Director and Chief Executive Officer and President;

DEERAJ JAIN as Director and Chief Financial Officer

STEVEN KNIGHT as Vice Chairman of the Board

 

 

The Above qualified people, having been nominated, have Accepted their positions. 

 

Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records. 

 

 

 

Dated:  April 2nd, 2019

 

 

 

_____________________

Lalit Verma, on behalf of 

Majority Shareholders
II 

Calendar No. 207 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1843 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 19, 2011 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, Guam, as the 

‘‘John Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN PANGELINAN GERBER POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, 

7 Guam, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John 

8 Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1843 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Pangelinan Ger5 ber Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 207 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1843 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postber Post Office Building’’. Barrigada, Guam, as the ‘‘John Pangelinan Ger- al Service located at 489 Army Drive in 

OCTOBER 19, 2011 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered October 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00346-CR

No. 05-14-00347-CR

MICHAEL KENNEDY LOUIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-10013-Q, F13-52531-Q

ORDER

Appellant’s October 14, 2014 motion to withdraw as appointed counsel is GRANTED. 

Riann C. Moore and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Appellate Division are REMOVED as 

counsel of record for appellant.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in these

appeals. We further ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of 

the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record with the order appointing new counsel.

These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental 
clerk’s record is filed, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2068 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2068

   To permit a Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to 
   continue to serve on the Commission if a successor is not timely 
                        appointed and confirmed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2011

  Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, Mrs. 
Myrick, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Bartlett, 
 Mr. Terry, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas, Mr. Altmire, 
   Mr. Latta, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Towns, Mr. Harper, Mr. Rush, and Mr. 
    Owens) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit a Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to 
   continue to serve on the Commission if a successor is not timely 
                        appointed and confirmed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
Continuation Act''.

SEC. 2. NRC COMMISSIONER TERMS.

    Section 201(c) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
5841(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``Notwithstanding the first sentence of this subsection, any member 
appointed and confirmed before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
this sentence who has not been removed by the President under 
subsection (e) may continue to serve on the Commission until the 
earlier of--
            ``(1) the date on which the member's successor has been 
        appointed and confirmed; or
            ``(2) the beginning of the first new Congress after the 
        date on which the member's term expires.''.
                                 <all>
```
|     |                                                                                                                            |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|      |                                                                                                                                                      |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Dated: | December 6, 2016 |   |
|   | By:  | /s/ EMANUEL CHIRICO  |
|   | Name: | Emanuel Chirico |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.31 N 76.47 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

★

●

● ● ●
MEMORANDUM

TO: Formaldehyde Work Group

FROM: Rebecca Edelstein, EPA/OPPT/EETD

DATE: February 23, 2011

SUBJECT: List of Urea-Formaldehyde Resin Substitutes

The purpose of this document is to identify chemicals that should be assessed for hazard and 

exposure based on publicly available information and input from public meetings, the California 

Air Resource Board (CARB), and ANPR comments on potential substitutes. Stakeholders from 

industry as well as CARB have stated that the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) is 

technology forcing; therefore, new technologies will likely be developed in the next few years 

that are not discussed in this document. 

 

The type of resin used to manufacture pressed wood products greatly affects the amount of 

formaldehyde released. Therefore, most technologies designed to limit formaldehyde emissions 

focus on alternative resins. Different resins that are expected to be used to limit the emissions of 

formaldehyde from the three pressed-wood products regulated under the CARB ATCM are listed 

below: 

Hardwood Plywood (HWPW) 

 Urea-formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine)

 Polyvinyl Acetate (PVA)

 PVA-Soy

 Phenol-formaldehyde (PF)

 Polyamide-soy—based on the combination of a polyamide epichlorohydrin 

combined with soy flour

Particleboard (PB) 

 Urea-formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine 

 Urea-formaldehyde (UF) + Scavengers

 Phenol-formaldehyde (PF)

 Melamine-Formaldehyde (MF) + Scavengers

 Cashew nut shell liquid resin 

Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) 

 Urea-formaldehyde (UF) + Melamine

 Urea-formaldehyde (UF) + Scavengers

 Polymethylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI)

 Melamine-Formaldehyde (MF) + Scavengers

Likely scavengers, additives, and cross linking agents that may be added to the resins include: 

urea, ammonia, phenol, tannins, soy protein (hydrolysates and meal), melamine, hexamethylene 
tetraamine (commonly referred to as hexamine), sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, triacetin 

(glycerol triacetate), tris(hydroxymethyl) nitromethane, and chromium complexes.

Public comments from members of the pressed wood industry indicate that these substitutes have 

a number of limitations (both cost and performance), but that the industry is committed to 

meeting the CARB ATCM phase 2 limits and is working on resolving the cost and performance 

issues. Information provided by CARB in a teleconference (July 29, 2009) and on its website on 

approved no added formaldehyde (NAF) and ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins 

indicates that the alternative resins and scavengers listed above are consistent with what industry

is currently using in certain products to meet the CARB ATCM limits.
### /Y)r 4WI fcosk, I rectea^cl you letfer aoour my nor meeitnc oirb fhr II.Ol Sezrw\ 3(h) 6-T "m£ Cede ok Crwind Pcazedurt, ^Sr t%£ 3peelers uere~ not r^eAt- io oe Pelrhcn Qof CJn't or Habeas Corpus^ -X fin&hd 

### jit tfejy Per Pcrificn itr OrferehcnGry KeueooJrlso yaA only Se4- hock 2 <rf "f^e 3 packets ZL &e/)l anJ none olf- me f3 ka^a cjriwe/) fv\e<v\GfaAau/*\s v/&\ uert Uijk jfre^.ldia H\e Court o\r Cnwine] fipp&ls 

### accept jit rv\eMorandu/*\S &r Jkc @k Pelihcfi fror fyiserehwcx^ V-tjietd^ it r\of can yscu b\e&?£ Mum -]rke/*\

RECEIVED IN COURT OFCRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 02 2015 AbelAcosta, Clerk \\vxf\kScM \tiriouf I Sharehez. Und

RECEIVED IN SOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 012015 AbdiAooste, Clerk {y

ur^-t
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Smitten Press: Legends and Lore, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Cox, Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 15, 2008



| |                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ ROBERT L. COX                                                                
| | Robert L. Cox,                                                                   
| | Chief Executive Officer, President,
Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting
| | Officer, Chairman of the Board of                                                
| | Directors