Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52233 

as applicable, is damaged to the extent 

that more than 20 percent of the apple 

production does not grade U.S. Fancy or 

better the following adjustments to the 

production to count will apply: 

* * * * * 

(c) Any apple production not graded 

or appraised prior to the earlier of the 

time apples are placed in storage or the 

date the apples are delivered to a 

packer, processor, or other handler will 

not be considered damaged apple 

production and will be considered 

production to count under this option. 

(d) Any adjustments that reduce your 

production to count under this option 

will not be applicable when 

determining production to count for 

APH purposes. 

Optional Coverage for Fresh Fruit 

Quality Adjustment Example: 

You have a 100 percent share in 10 

acres of fresh apples designated on your 

acreage report, with a 600 bushel per 

acre guarantee, and you select 100 

percent of the price election on a price 

election of $9.10 per bushel. You 

harvest 5,000 bushels of apples from 

your designated fresh apple acreage, but 

only 2,650 of those bushels grade U.S. 

Fancy or better. Assuming you do not 

sell any of your fresh apple production 

as U.S. Fancy or better, your indemnity 

would be calculated as follows: 

A. 10 acres × 600 bushels per acre = 

6,000-bushel production guarantee of 

fresh apples; 

B. 6,000-bushel production guarantee 

of fresh apples × $9.10 price election × 

100 percent of price election = $54,600 

value of production guarantee for fresh 

apple acreage; 

C. The value of the fresh apple 

production to count is determined as 

follows: 

i. 5,000 bushels harvested ¥ 2,650 

bushels that graded U.S. Fancy or better 

= 2,350 bushels of fresh apple 

production not grading U.S. Fancy or 

better; 

ii. 2,350/5,000 = 47 percent of fresh 

apple production not grading U.S. 

Fancy or better; 

iii. In accordance with section 

14(b)(5)(ii): 47 percent ¥ 40 percent = 

7 percent in excess of 40 percent; 

iv. 7 percent × 3 = 21 percent; 

v. 40 percent + 21 percent = 61 

percent; 

vi. 5,000 bushels harvested × .61 (61 

percent) = 3,050 bushels of fresh apple 

production not grading U.S. Fancy or 

better; 

vii. 5,000 bushels harvested ¥ 3,050 

bushels of fresh apple production not 

grading U.S. Fancy or better = 1,950 

bushels of adjusted fresh apple 

production to count; 

viii. 1,950 bushels of adjusted fresh 

apples production to count × $9.10 price 

election × 100 percent of price election 

= $17,745 value of fresh apple 

production to count; 

D. $54,600 value of production 

guarantee for fresh apples ¥ $17,745 

value of fresh apple production to count 

= $36,855 value of loss; 

E. $36,855 value of loss × 100 percent 

share = $36,855 indemnity payment. 

* * * * * 

Signed in Washington, DC, on August 16, 

2010. 

William J. Murphy, 

Manager, Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20619 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0482; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–225–AD; Amendment 

39–16411; AD 2010–17–17] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet 

Series 100 & 440) Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This AD results 

from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

There have been several Stick Pusher 

Capstan Shaft failures causing severe 

degradation of the stick pusher function. This 

directive is issued to revise the first flight of 

the day check of the stall protection system 

to detect degradation of the stick pusher 

function. It also introduces a new repetitive 

maintenance task to limit exposure to 

dormant failure of the stick pusher capstan 

shaft. 

Dormant loss or severe degradation of 

the stick pusher function could result in 

reduced controllability of the airplane. 

We are issuing this AD to require 

actions to correct the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

September 29, 2010. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of September 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bruce Valentine, Avionics and Flight 

Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

New York 11590; telephone (516) 228– 

7328; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on June 3, 2010 (75 FR 31324). 

That NPRM proposed to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

There have been several Stick Pusher 

Capstan Shaft failures causing severe 

degradation of the stick pusher function. This 

directive is issued to revise the first flight of 

the day check of the stall protection system 

to detect degradation of the stick pusher 

function. It also introduces a new repetitive 

maintenance task to limit exposure to 

dormant failure of the stick pusher capstan 

shaft. 

Dormant loss or severe degradation of 

the stick pusher function could result in 

reduced controllability of the airplane. 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

considered the comment received. Air 

Line Pilots Association, International 

supports the NPRM. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data, 

including the comment received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

as proposed. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

52234 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have required different 

actions in this AD from those in the 

MCAI in order to follow our FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a Note within the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD will affect 

601 products of U.S. registry. We also 

estimate that it will take about 1 workhour per product to comply with the 

basic requirements of this AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to 

be $51,085, or $85 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains the NPRM, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. Comments will be available in 

the AD docket shortly after receipt. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2010–17–17 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 

39–16411. Docket No. FAA–2010–0482; 

Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–225–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) 

becomes effective September 29, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. 

Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 

& 440) airplanes, certificated in any category, 

serial numbers 7003 through 7990 inclusive, 

and 8000 and subsequent. 

Note 1: This AD requires revisions to 

certain operator maintenance documents to 

include new inspections. Compliance with 

these inspections is required by 14 CFR 

91.403(c). For airplanes that have been 

previously modified, altered, or repaired in 

the areas addressed by these inspections, the 

operator may not be able to accomplish the 

inspections described in the revisions. In this 

situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), 

the operator must request approval for an 

alternative method of compliance according 

to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. The request 

should include a description of changes to 

the required inspections that will ensure the 

continued operational safety of the airplane. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight controls. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

There have been several Stick Pusher 

Capstan Shaft failures causing severe 

degradation of the stick pusher function. This 

directive is issued to revise the first flight of 

the day check of the stall protection system 

to detect degradation of the stick pusher 

function. It also introduces a new repetitive 

maintenance task to limit exposure to 

dormant failure of the stick pusher capstan 

shaft. 

Dormant loss or severe degradation of the 

stick pusher function could result in reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Actions 

(g) Do the following actions. 

(1) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD, revise the Limitations section of 

the Canadair Regional Jet Airplane Flight 

Manual (AFM) CSP A–012 to include the 

information in Canadair Regional Jet 

Temporary Revision (TR) RJ/178–1, dated 

March 8, 2010; as specified in the TR. The 

Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/178–1, dated 

March 8, 2010, introduces procedures for 

performing a stall protection system test. 

Operate the airplane according to the 

limitations and procedures in the Canadair 

Regional Jet TR RJ/178–1, dated March 8, 

2010. 

Note 2: This may be done by inserting a 

copy of Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/178–1, 

dated March 8, 2010, into the Canadair 

Regional Jet AFM CSP A–012. When this 

Canadair Regional Jet TR has been included 

in general revisions of the Canadair Regional 

Jet AFM, the general revisions may be 

inserted in the Canadair Regional Jet AFM, 

provided the relevant information in the 

general revision is identical to that in the 

Canadair Regional Jet TR. 

(2) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD, revise Appendix A—Certification 

Maintenance Requirements of Part 2 of the 

Bombardier CL–600–2B19 Maintenance 

Requirements Manual (MRM) by 

incorporating the information in Bombardier 

TR 2A–43, dated May 7, 2008; as specified 

in Bombardier TR 2A–43. The initial 

compliance time for the new MRM task 

identified in Bombardier TR 2A–43 is at the 

later of the times specified in paragraphs 

(g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii) of this AD. Thereafter, 

except as provided by paragraph (h)(1) of this 

AD, no alternative task intervals may be 

used. Bombardier TR 2A–43, dated May 7, 

2008, introduces procedures for a function 

check of the stick pusher capstan. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52235 

(i) Prior to the accumulation of 5,000 total 

flight hours. 

(ii) Within 500 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

Note 3: The actions required by paragraph 

(g)(2) of this AD may be done by inserting a 

copy of Bombardier TR 2A–43, dated May 7, 

2008, into Appendix A—Certification 

Maintenance Requirements of Part 2 of the 

Bombardier CL–600–2B19 MRM. When this 

Bombardier TR has been included in general 

revisions of the Bombardier CL–600–2B19 

MRM, the Bombardier CL–600–2B19 TR may 

be removed from the MRM, provided the 

relevant information in the general revision 

is identical to that in Bombardier CL–600– 

2B19 TR 2A–43, dated May 7, 2008. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(h) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 

11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 

794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer or other source, 

use these actions if they are FAA-approved. 

Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State 

of Design Authority (or their delegated 

agent). You are required to assure the product 

is airworthy before it is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

(4) Special Flight Permits: We are not 

allowing special flight permits, as described 

in Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 

and 21.199). 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2009–36, dated September 2, 

2009; Bombardier CL–600–2B19 TR 2A–43, 

dated May 7, 2008, to Appendix A— 

Certification Maintenance Requirements of 

Part 2 of the Bombardier CL–600–2B19 MRM; 

and Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/178–1, dated 

March 8, 2010, to the Canadair Regional Jet 

AFM CSP A–012; for related information. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(j) You must use Bombardier Temporary 

Revision (TR) 2A–43, dated May 7, 2008, to 

Appendix A—Certification Maintenance 

Requirements of Part 2 of the Bombardier 

CL–600–2B19 Maintenance Requirements 

Manual; and Canadair Regional Jet TR RJ/ 

178–1, dated March 8, 2010, to the Canadair 

Regional Jet Airplane Flight Manual CSP A– 

012; as applicable; to do the actions required 

by this AD, unless the AD specifies 

otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; e-mail 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// 

www.bombardier.com. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

12, 2010. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20487 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0523; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–CE–018–AD; Amendment 

39–16407; AD 2010–17–15] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Hawker 

Beechcraft Corporation (Type 

Certificate No. A00010WI Previously 

Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company) 

Model 390 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model 

390 airplanes. This AD requires you to 

inspect for installation of certain serial 

number (S/N) starter generators and 

replace the starter generator if one with 

an affected serial number is found. This 

AD results from reports that starter 

generators with deficient armature 

insulating materials may have been 

installed on certain airplanes. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and replace 

starter generators with defective 

armature insulating materials. This 

condition could result in the loss of 

operation of one or both starter 

generators with consequent loss of all 

non battery electrical power. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective on 

September 29, 2010. 

On September 29, 2010, the Director 

of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of certain 

publications listed in this AD. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Hawker 

Beechcraft Corporation, 9709 East 

Central, Wichita, Kansas 67201; 

telephone: (316) 676–5034; fax: (316) 

676–6614; Internet: https:// 

www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/ 

service_support/pubs/. 

To view the AD docket, go to U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, or on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. The docket 

number is FAA–2010–0523; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–CE–018–AD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, 

Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 

946–4174; fax: (316) 946–4107; e-mail: 

kevin.schwemmer@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

On May 14, 2010, we issued a 

proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to 

include an AD that would apply to 

certain serial number starter generators 

where deficient armature insulating 

materials may have been installed on 

Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model 

390 airplanes. This proposal was 

published in the Federal Register as a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

on May 21, 2010 (FR 75 28506). The 

NPRM proposed to detect and replace 

starter generators with deficient 

armature insulating materials. This 

condition could result in the loss of 

operation of one or both starter 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES