### 14007 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices

968TH

### —M EETING

### —Continued

Item No. Docket No. Company

E–4 ........ RM09–18–001 ............................................. Revision to Electric Reliability Organization Definition of Bulk Electric System. E–5 ........ RM11–14–000 ............................................. Analysis of Horizontal Market Power under the Federal Power Act. E–6 ........ RM10–16–000 ............................................. System Restoration Reliability Standards. E–7 ........ RM10–10–000 ............................................. Planning Resource Adequacy Assessment Reliability Standard. E–8 ........ RM10–15–000 ............................................. Mandatory Reliability Standards for Interconnection Reliability Operating Limits.E–9 ........ RM09–19–000 ............................................. Western Electric Coordinating Council Qualified Transfer Path Unscheduled Flow Relief Regional Reliability Standard. E–10 ...... RR09–6–003 ............................................... North American Electric Reliability Corporation. E–11 ...... OMITTED. E–12 ...... ER11–2256–000 .......................................... California Independent System Operator Corporation. E–13 ...... EL08–47–006 .............................................. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. E–14 ...... EL11–12–000 .............................................. Idaho Wind Partners 1, LLC. E–15 ...... EL10–1–001 ................................................ Southern California Edison Company.E–16 ...... EL10–84–002 .............................................. Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company and the California Public Utilities Commission.

**Gas**

G–1 ........ OMITTED. G–2 ........ RP11–1495–002 .......................................... Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. G–3 ........ RP10–315–002 ............................................ Columbia Gulf Transmission Company. G–4 ........ OR07–7–000 ............................................... Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v. Calnev Pipe Line L LC.OR07–18–000 ............................................. America West Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc., Chevron Products Company, Continental Airlines, Inc., Southwest Airlines Co. and Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. OR07–19–000 ............................................. ConocoPhillips Co. v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. OR07–22–000 ............................................. BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. OR09–15–000 ............................................. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC. OR09–20–000 ............................................. BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Calnev Pipe Line LLC.

**Hydro**

H–1 ........ P–2539–061 ................................................ Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. H–2 ........ P–2195–025 ................................................ Portland General Electric Company. H–3 ........ P–1390–063 ................................................ Southern California Edison Company.

**Certificates**

C–1 ........ OMITTED. C–2 ........ CP10–492–000 ............................................ Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC. C–3 ........ OMITTED. C–4 ........ CP10–22–000 .............................................. Magnum Gas Storage, LLC, Magnum Solutions, LLC. C–5 ........ CP10–486–000 ............................................ Colorado Interstate Gas Company.

Issued: March 10, 2011. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.

A free Webcast of this event is available through http://www.ferc.gov. Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this event can do so by navigating to http://www.ferc.gov’s Calendar of Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its Webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the free Webcasts. It also offers access to this event via television in the DC area and via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or contact Danelle Springer or David Reininger at 703–993–3100.

Immediately following the conclusion of the Commission Meeting, a press briefing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room. Members of the public may view this briefing in the designated overflow room. This statement is intended to notify the public that the press briefings that follow Commission meetings may now be viewed remotely at Commission headquarters, but will not be telecast through the Capitol Connection service.

[FR Doc. 2011–6067 Filed 3–11–11; 11:15 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0199; FRL–9280–6]**

**Notice of Receipt of Petition From the Government of Canada for Application**  **of the Renewable Fuel Standard Aggregate Compliance Approach** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is issuing notice of receipt of a petition for EPA to authorize the use of an aggregate approach for compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard renewable biomass provisions. This petition was submitted by the Government of Canada. The petition requests that EPA determine that an aggregate compliance approach will provide reasonable assurance that


### 14008 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices

planted crops and crop residue from Canada meet the definition of renewable biomass. EPA has previously determined that the aggregate compliance approach is applicable in the United States. If the petition is approved, crops and crop residue from Canada would not be subject to individual recordkeeping and reporting requirements. This determination could change if EPA later determined, through its annual evaluation of the aggregate compliance approach, that the number of acres of agricultural land in Canada exceeded a baseline number of acres determined to be available under the Act for the production of crops and crop residue meeting the definition of renewable biomass. In this notice, EPA is soliciting comment on all aspects of the petition.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before May 16, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2011–0199, by one of the following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.

• Fax: (202)566–1741.

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies.

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011– 0199. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov. The http:// www.regulations.gov Web site is an

‘‘anonymous access ’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Docket: The complete petition and all supporting materials are available for public review in the docket. All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566–1741.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Meg McCarthy, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Mailcode: 6406J, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)343–9968; fax number: (202)343–2802; email address: mccarthy.meg@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  (A) Request for Comments

On January 31, 2011, the Government of Canada submitted a petition to the Administrator pursuant to 40 CFR 80.1457 requesting approval of an aggregate approach for compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard renewable biomass provisions for planted crops and crop residue from Canada. This petition has been placed in the public docket. The petition requests that EPA determine that an aggregate compliance approach will provide reasonable assurance that planted crops and crop residue from Canada meet the definition of renewable biomass and will continue to meet the definition of renewable biomass, and thus will not be subject to individual recordkeeping and reporting requirements unless EPA determines through an annual evaluation that more acres are planted to crops and crop residue than are permissible consistent with the definition of renewable biomass. EPA solicits comments and information to assist the Administrator in making a determination concerning the petition. (B) Background on the Petition Process

Pursuant to 40 CFR 80.1457, EPA may approve a petition for application of the aggregate compliance approach in a foreign country if it finds that such an approach will provide reasonable assurance that planted crops and crop residue from the petitioning country meet the definition of renewable biomass, and will continue to meet the definition of renewable biomass, as demonstrated through the submission of credible, reliable, and verifiable data. As part of its evaluation of the petition, EPA will consider several factors, including:

• Whether there has been a reasonable identification of the ‘‘ 2007 baseline area of land, ’’ defined as the total amount of cropland, pastureland, and land that is equivalent to U.S. Conservation Reserve Program land in the country in question that was actively managed or fallow and nonforested on December 19, 2007, taking into account the definitions of terms such as ‘‘ cropland, ’’ ‘‘pastureland, ’’

‘‘planted crop, ’’ and ‘‘crop residue’’ included in the final RFS2 regulations.

• Whether information on the total amount of cropland, pastureland, and land that is equivalent to U.S. Conservation Reserve Program land in the country in question for years preceding and following calendar year 2007 shows that the 2007 baseline area of land is not likely to be exceeded in the future.

• Whether economic considerations, legal constraints, historical land use and agricultural practices and other factors show that it is likely that producers of planted crops and crop residue will continue to use agricultural land within the 2007 baseline area of land identified into the future, as opposed to clearing and cultivating land not included in the 2007 baseline area of land.

• Whether there is a reliable method to evaluate, on an annual basis, if the


### 14009 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices

2007 baseline area of land is being or has been exceeded.

• Whether a credible and reliable entity has been identified to conduct data gathering and analysis, including annual identification of the aggregate amount of cropland, pastureland, and land that is equivalent to U.S. Conservation Reserve Program land, that is needed for an annual EPA evaluation of the aggregate compliance approach, and whether the data, analyses, and methodologies are publicly available.

• Whether the petition submission requirements specified in 40 CFR 80.1457(b) have been satisfied, including the submission of a letter signed by a national government representative at the ministerial level or equivalent confirming that the petition and all supporting data have been reviewed and verified by the ministry (or ministries) or department(s) of the national government with primary expertise in agricultural land use patterns, practices, data, and statistics of the country in question, that the data support a finding that planted crops and crop residue from the specified country meet the definition of renewable biomass and will continue to meet the definition of renewable biomass, and that the responsible national government ministry (or ministries) or department(s) will review and verify the data submitted on an annual basis to facilitate EPA’s annual assessment of the 2007 baseline area of land.

The public is specifically invited to comment on these factors, whether Canada has met all submission requirements specified in the regulations, and on any other issue that could inform EPA’s evaluation of the petition.

Dated: March 10, 2011. Margo Tsirigotis Oge, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011–6033 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.**

**[Public Notice 2011–0051]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; Comment**  **Request**

**AGENCY :**  Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

**ACTION :**  Submission for OMB review and comments request.

Form Title: Report of Overdue Accounts Under Short-Term Policies EIB 92–27. **SUMMARY :**  The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

The collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the information necessary to monitor the borrower’s payments for exported goods covered under its short and medium-term export credit insurance policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can manage the portfolio in an informed

manner.

Form can be viewed at http:// www.exim.gov/pub/pending/
EIB92

_27.pdf.

**DATES :**  Comments should be received on or before May 16, 2011 to be assured of consideration.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments maybe submitted electronically on http:// www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export-Import Bank of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Titles and Form Number: EIB 92–27. Report of Overdue Accounts Under Short-Term Policies.

OMB Number: 3048–0027. Type of Review: Regular.
Need and Use: The collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the information necessary to monitor the borrower’s payments for exported goodscovered under its short- and mediumterm export credit insurance policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can manage the portfolio in an informed manner.

Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S goods and services.

Annual Number of Respondents: 396. Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.

Government Annual Burden Hours: 33 hours.

Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly.

Sharon A. Whitt, Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–5941 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6690–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS**  **COMMISSION**

**[DA 11–453]**

**Federal Advisory Committee Act; Technological Advisory Council** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of public meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice advises interested persons that the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Technological Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 in the Commission Meeting Room, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

**DATES :**  March 30, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Walter Johnston, Chief, Electromagnetic Compatibility Division, 202–418–0807; Walter.Johnston@FCC.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Technical Advisory Council members have been prioritizing and further developing technology issues discussed at the initial meeting on November 4, 2011. The Technical Advisory Council members will discuss this work, outline progress to date and discuss possible further work. The FCC will attempt to accommodate as many people as possible. However, admittance will be limited to seating availability. Meetings are also broadcast live with open captioning over the internet from the FCC Live Web page at http:// www.fcc.gov/live/. The public may submit written comments before the meeting to: Walter Johnston, the FCC’s Designated Federal Officer forTechnological Advisory Council by email: Walter.Johnston@fcc.gov or U.S. Postal Service Mail (Walter Johnston, Federal Communications Commission, Room 2–A665, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554). Open captioning will be provided for this event. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Requests for such accommodations should be submitted via e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or by calling the Office of Engineering and Technology at 202– 418–2470 (voice), (202) 418–1944 (fax). Such requests should include a detailed description of the accommodation needed. In addition, please include your contact information. Please allow at