alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Daniel S. Goldberg,President and Director of New Skies Satellites Holdings Ltd., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of New Skies Satellites Holdings Ltd.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Daniel S. Goldberg         |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Daniel S. Goldberg             |
|   |   | President and Director         |
|   |   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

 

Date:       March30, 2006

 

----
#### Clifford ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27910.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1956.

*733>No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted for two violations of the liquor law. Punishment was assessed at $100 for each, offense. . . ;

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed. • ’
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(a)



AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
ACUITY BRANDS, INC
AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of the 29th day of March, 2019, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and VERNON J. NAGEL (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Severance Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2004 (“Severance Agreement”), and amended as of April 21, 2006, September 26, 2006, October 28, 2009 and March 28, 2014, providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 2.8 is hereby replaced in its entirety by the following:


2.8    “Severance Period” - A period equal to twenty-four (24) months from the Executive’s Date of Termination.
		
	2.
	Section 4.2 is hereby replaced in its entirety by the following: 


4.2    Annual Bonus. Executive shall be paid an amount equal to the greater of (i) 200% of employee’s gross salary, multiplied by a fraction (the “Pro Rata Fraction”), the numerator of which is the number of days that have elapsed in the then current fiscal year through Executive’s Date of Termination and the denominator of which is 365, or (ii) the annual incentive bonus that would be paid or payable to Executive under the Incentive Plan based upon the Company’s actual performance for such fiscal year multiplied by the Pro Rata Fraction.  The bonus amount determined pursuant to Section 4.2(i) shall be paid to Executive within ten (10) days of Executive’s Date of Termination and any additional amount payable pursuant to Section 4.2(ii) shall be payable at the same time as bonuses are payable to other executives under the Incentive Plan. “Incentive Plan” shall mean the Acuity Brands, Inc. Management Compensation and Incentive Plan for the fiscal year in which the Executive's Termination of Employment occurs.  Terms used in this Section 4.2 shall have the meaning ascribed them in the Incentive Plan.
		
	3.
	This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.










Exhibit 10(a)



	
				
	 
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
	 
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

	

/s/ Vernon J. Nagel
	 
	By:  
	/s/ Richard K. Reece

	VERNON J. NAGEL
	 
	 
	RICHARD K. REECE

	 
	 
	 
	Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF EXPERTS

The Board of Directors
First Financial Bancorp:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements dated
April 23, 1991 on Form S-8 of First Financial Bancorp and dated June 12, 1997 on
Form S-8 of First Financial Bancorp of our report dated February 12, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of First Financial Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the
December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of First Financial Bancorp.


                              /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Sacramento, California
March 5, 1998

                                       1
This Agreement entered into on this 7Ul day of July, 2003 (the "Effective Date")


Exhibit 4.24




This Agreement entered into on this 7Ul day of July, 2003 (the "Effective Date")

between

InNexus Biotechnology Inc.  

a company duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and having an office at 1400 ~ 400 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3G2

(the "Corporation")

-and-

Beloud Management Consultants Ltd,,  a  company duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and having an office at 1399 Brentwood Road, Kelowna, British Columbia, VIZ 1K8

("BMC")

1.        The Corporation has enlisted the services of BMC which is solely owned by Mr. Lome Beloud, a Chartered Accountant with an office in Kelowna, BC,

2.        BMC shall provide market-making activities to the Corporation as defined by and in accordance with Policy 3.4 - Investor Relations, Promotional and Market Making Activities. The rules of the TSX Venture Exchange define market-making activities in part as, "Proper market-making activity corrects temporary imbalances in the supply of and demand for an Issuer'8 securities. The market should be allowed to rise and fall naturally, with the market-making activity operating primarily to smooth out these imbalances and facilitate an orderly market. Although a Person involved in market-making is not expected to ignore his or her economic self-interest or be precluded from also holding securities for investment purposes, he or she should normally be selling into a rising market and buying into a falling market. If the price stabilizes and there are sufficient buyers and sellers on both sides of the market, market-making activities should generally not occur at a level which materially affects the market".

3.       Mr. Lome Beloud shall execute and file, as per TSX regulations, a Personal Information Form ("PIF").

4.        The Corporation shall issue a press release forthwith, making full disclosure of the contents of this agreement.

5.        The Corporation shall execute and submit forthwith, for TSX approval, Form 3C, Declaration of Certified Filing Promotional Investor Relations and Market-Making Activities.

6.        This agreement shall be valid for a period of ten months commencing from the Effective Date of this Agreement.

7.






8.

The Company will pay to BMC a fee in the amount of $30,000.00 plus GST, payable within three days of the Effective Date of this Agreement. BMC will be responsible for the payment of any taxes or remittances that may be payable in respect of the fee.




9.

The relationship between the Corporation and BMC is strictly on an arms length basis. BMC is not an employee of the Corporation nor will BMC hold itself out as being an employee of the Corporation. BMC shall be responsible for the payment of any taxes or remittances that may be payable on the agreed fee.







InNexus Biotechnology Inc.

Beloud Management Consultants Ltd.







  /s/ Stuart Rogers    

 /s/ Lorne Beloud

per:

per:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (“Deep Down”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned,
Ronald E. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deep Down, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep
      Down.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:     November
16, 2009





/s/ RONALD E.
SMITH


Ronald E.
Smith


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00069-CV

______________________________

TEXAS KENWORTH CO., Appellant

V.

R. BYRON ROACH, TRUSTEE, L.L.C.,

AND CHALKER ENERGY MANAGEMENT II, L.L.C., Appellees

 

On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-0512

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Texas Kenworth Co., appellant, and R. Byron Roach, Trustee, L.L.C., and Chalker Energy

Management II, L.L.C., appellees, have filed with this Court a joint motion to dismiss the pending

appeal in this matter. The parties represent to this Court they have reached a full and final

settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal

is moot.

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: September 22, 2008

Date Decided: September 23, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1986 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1986

    To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the 
   production period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2011

    Mr. Davis of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Rogers of 
 Kentucky, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Boustany, and 
 Mr. Scalise) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the 
   production period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aged Distilled Spirits 
Competitiveness Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN DETERMINATION OF 
              PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 
              263A.

    (a) In General.--Section 263A(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to general exceptions) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Exemption of natural aging process in determination 
        of production period for distilled spirits.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, the production period for distilled spirits 
        shall be determined without regard to any period allocated to 
        the natural aging process.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to production periods beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
INFORMEDICS, INC.

                                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              1997                  1996
                                                            --------              --------
     <S>                                                  <C>                      <C>  

     PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
     Net Loss                                             $ (1,290,903)             $(472,906)
                                                        ================      =================

     Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding                                             2,650,416              2,646,194

     Add:  Weighted average number of shares of
        common stock equivalents (1)                             -----                  -----
                                                        ----------------      -----------------

     Weighted average number of shares used in
        calculation of earnings per share                    2,650,416              2,646,194
                                                        ================      =================

     Loss Per Share                                           $  (0.49)              $  (0.18)
                                                        ================      =================
</TABLE>


(1) Common stock  equivalents  are excluded from the calculation of net loss per
share for the years ended October 31, 1997 and 1996, as they are antidilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1843 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1843

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, Guam, as the ``John Pangelinan Gerber 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN PANGELINAN GERBER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, Guam, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John 
Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1843

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, Guam, as the ``John Pangelinan Gerber 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                           4,856,000
<SECURITIES>                        18,000
<RECEIVABLES>                   16,388,000
<ALLOWANCES>                       (673,000)
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                21,682,000
<PP&E>                             760,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  30,856,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,370,000
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             6,000
<OTHER-SE>                      28,486,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    30,856,000
<SALES>                         55,574,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                55,574,000
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   51,247,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (1,602,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (220,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  6,149,000
<INCOME-TAX>                     2,058,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     4,091,000
<EPS-BASIC>                            .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .81


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51422 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR EFRAIN NAVARETTE-CANO, also known as Hector Navarrette, also known as Hector Cano, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1124-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Efrain Navarette-Cano appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Navarette-Cano contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-51422 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Navarette-Cano maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Navarette-Cano acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.