alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kramont Realty Trust (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl E. Kraus,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Carl E. Kraus
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Carl E. Kraus
                                      Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment
                                      Officer and Treasurer
                                      Kramont Realty Trust
                                      May 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date: November 10 , 2004
                                    /s/ Linda L. Perry
                                    ____________________________________
                                    Linda L. Perry
                                    Principal Executive officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to Registration Statement No. 333-50545 on Form N-4 of the Lincoln Benefit Life Variable Annuity Account ("the Account") of our report dated April 1, 2019, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights within Note 7 of the Account, and relating to the financial statements and the related financial statement schedules of Lincoln Benefit Life Company of our report dated April 1, 2019, both appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of the Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 11, 2019
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 13.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of China Techfaith Wireless
Communication Technology Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Defu Dong, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 12, 2008


By: /s/ Defu Dong
    ---------------------------------
Name: Defu Dong
Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Buck Cloud BIZZELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28228.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 11, 1956.

Lewis E. Miller, Jr., John McLean, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Howard M. Fender, Dist. Atty., Grady Hight, Eugene D. Biddle and Conard Florence, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Leon B.' Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ■ ■ ■ •

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction, upon a plea of guilty before a jury, for the offense of assault with intent to murder; the punishment, fifteen years in the penitentiary.

In view of the disposition made of this case, a statement of the evidence is not deemed called for.

In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court gave them no instruction whatsoever covering the law or definition of the offense of assault with intent to murder. The jury were told only that appellant had pleaded guilty to the offense charged and instructed that they would therefore find him guilty and assess his punishment at not less than two nor more than fifteen years’ confinement in,the penitentiary.

The question of suspension of sentence was also submitted.

Nowhere in the charge did the trial- court define the term “malice aforethought.”

One of the mandatory provisions of Art. 1160, Vernon’s P.C., which denounces the offense, of assault witji intent to murder, is that “Upon the trial of any. person for assault with intent to murder, the Court, in *942its charge to the jury, shall define malice aforethought and in a proper case murder without malice, and instruct the jury touching the application of the law to the facts.”

The case of Villa v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 142, 53 S.W.2d 1023, is here directly in point and controlling. In that case, the offense being assault to murder upon a plea of guilty, we held that the charge was fundamentally erroneous in failing to incorporate a definition of malice aforethought.

For the latest expression of this court regarding fundamental error in a charge to the jury, see Garza v. State, 288 S.W.2d 785.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Hazlett, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment *868convicting him, following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and petit larceny. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court impermissibly reduced the People’s burden of proof when it instructed the jury to "[l]et no guilty person be acquitted. It is equally important, Ladies and Gentlemen, that no innocent person be found guilty”. While this instruction was improper, we find that the court, on numerous occasions, correctly instructed the jury that the People had the burden of proving defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the court’s charge, when considered as a whole, conveyed the proper standard to the jury *(see, People v Canty,*60 NY2d 830, 831-832; *People v Harris,*163 AD2d 898). Moreover, we find the error harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242; *People v Wallace,*159 AD2d 1022; *People v Mitchell,*72 AD2d 920, 921).

Further, although the prosecutor twice improperly suggested on summation that defendant’s attorney had a negative view of defendant’s case and testimony *(see, People v Jones,*74 AD2d 854, 857) and improperly placed before the jury his personal belief that defendant was lying *(see, People v Grice,*100 AD2d 419, 421), we cannot say that the prosecutor’s conduct was so pervasive that defendant was deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Widger,*126 AD2d 962, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1011; *cf., People v Mott,*94 AD2d 415). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, David Ryon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Image Technology
Laboratories, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

      (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
            fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

      (a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls.


November 19, 2004                         /s/ David Ryon
                                          -----------------------
                                          David Ryon
                                          Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
      as
      adopted pursuant to SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
      Edward
  Alexander , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
      Proton Laboratories, Inc. , certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      Amendment
      Number 1for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 , as filed by the Company
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to which this Certification is
      an
      Exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the
      Form
      10-QSB financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Proton Laboratories, Inc.








January
                4, 2008
            By:
                  /s/
            Edward
                  AlexanderEDWARD
                  ALEXANDERPrincipal
                Accounting officer and Chief Financial Officer











This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Proton Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Proton Laboratories, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Horace BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27592.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1955.

*873No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ■

DICE, Commissioner.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100. "

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.'

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was prob&ted. . ■■ ■ •

In compliance w.ith the holding in Gildpr-•bloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision'’for probation, and as reformed; is affirmed. ’

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 31

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

	The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

	Ann Murtlow, President and Chief Executive Officer and HamsaShadaksharappa, Senior Vice President - Financial Services, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO), each certifies that,to the best of his or her knowledge:

- The Annual Report on Form 10-K of IPALCO for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of IPALCO.

```

/s/ Ann Murtlow                           /s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa
---------------------------               --------------------------------------------------
Ann Murtlow                               Hamsa Shadaksharappa
President and Chief Executive Officer     Senior Vice President - Financial Services, Chief
                                          Financial Officer and Secretary
March 25, 2003                            March 25, 2003
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.30




Medley Capital LLC
280 Park Avenue, 6th Floor East
New York, NY 10017


November [__], 2018


[Name of recipient]
[Address]


Re:  [Insert LLC name]


Dear [Name]:
Subject to your execution of this letter agreement, which shall be considered an “Award Letter” for purposes of the Company Agreement (as defined below) (this “Award Letter”), Medley Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Managing Member”), is pleased to confirm your admission to [Insert LLC name] (the “Company”) as a Member as of November [__], 2018.
You agree to become a Non-Managing Member as defined in and subject to all the terms of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company, dated as of November [__], 2018, a copy of which has been provided to you (as the same may be further amended from time to time, the “Company Agreement”).  Each capitalized term used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Company Agreement.
For purposes of Section 2.6 of the Company Agreement, pursuant to this Award Letter, you are awarded a Carried Interest Percentage of [    ] and [    ]-tenths percent (__._%).
[Signature page immediately follows.]

































If you have any questions, please contact John Fredericks (email john.fredericks@mdly.com or telephone (415) 321-3180).  Otherwise, please sign a copy of this Award Letter in the space indicated below and return it to John Fredericks.


Sincerely,
Medley Capital LLC, in its capacity as managing member of the Company


By:                        
Name:    
Title:
#### Ivan Benton GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28570.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 7, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record-on - appeal. i . - ., ,

Dan -Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, 7\sst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon . B. Douglas, State's Atty., - Austin,, for the State. .. . .

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol about his person, and punishment was assessed at sixty days’ confinement in jail.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Alberto RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27520.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1955.

*875James Tafolla, Jr.' John F. Tafolla, San Antonio, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $50.00.

No statement of. facts accompanies the record.

The sole question presented for -review is the overruling of the appellant’s motion to quash the jury panel because the same had not been drawn by the County Clerk and the Sheriff under the direction of the County Judge as provided by Article 2096, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.

The appellant overlooks Section 3 of Article 2101,- Interchangeable' Juries, which was enacted several years after the preceding Article and which is now controlling. See Curry v. State, 157 Tex.Cr. R. 237, 248 S.W.2dT66.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino-Biotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Curtis Hunsinger, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Sole Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino-Biotics, Inc., and will be retained by Sino-Biotics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/   Curtis Hunsinger

Curtis Hunsinger, President, Chief Executive

Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal

Executive Officer), Sole Director





Date:  January 19, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000728391
<NAME> IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,787,969
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    113,661
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         123,699
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       157,740
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,183,069
<COMMON>                                       389,966
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            466,397
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 857,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     51,898
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           662,591
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              46,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,250
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 553,604
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,183,069
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      762,503
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            68,248
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     531,036
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     599,284
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        163,219
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,556
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 164,775
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        50,500
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,275
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,182
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  114,275
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        83,630
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       45,110
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         251,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7943** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TYREE LAMAR SLADE, a/k/a Ovious Mcfly , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00024

- JPJ

- 5 )

Submitted : April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE , DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Tyree Lamar Slade , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst , Zachary T. Lee , Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM Tyree Lamar Slade appeals the district court’s order
d enying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the r easons stated by the district court. United States v.
Slade , No. 1:08

- cr - 00024

- JPJ

- 5 (W.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFI RMED