alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9844-9845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-390-000.
    Applicants: Dogwood Energy LLC, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric 
Utility Commission.
    Description: Joint Petition for Temporary Waivers of Capacity 
Release Regulations, et al. of Dogwood Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 2/1/24.
    Accession Number: 20240201-5251.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/13/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-392-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.

[[Page 9845]]

    Description: Annual Report of Operational Purchases and Sales of 
Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Filed Date: 2/6/24.
    Accession Number: 20240206-5044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/20/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57180707173132253479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="125d424252747760713c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 6, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-02816 Filed 2-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-7;1 Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2 Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3 I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4 The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006    By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale Name: Ellen Z. Lamale Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20956

 

ADAM DANIELS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRADFORD, Police Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHRIS

CONNEALY, Fire Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, #6; RAFAEL

GAITAN, Chief; WILLIAM DOWLING; SAMUEL ADAMS; WAYLAND KELLEY;

RALPH CUNNINGHAM; W. J. BEARDEN; S. WILSON; VANCE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CV-3312

--------------------

Before JOLLY, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adam Daniels, Texas inmate # 619572, appeals from the

summary judgment granted in favor of some but not all defendants

in his civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

This court must examine the basis for its appellate jurisdiction

sua sponte if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court’s jurisdiction is

limited to appeals from “final decisions of the district courts.” 
No. 03-20956

-2-

Brown v. Miss. Valley State Univ., 311 F.3d 328, 331 (5th Cir.

2002)(internal quotation and citation omitted). The district

court’s “Memorandum and Order on Partial Dismissal” is not a

final judgment. See id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). 

Accordingly, the instant appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

All of Daniels’s outstanding motions are DENIED.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00008**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00008\00008_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00008\00008_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00008\00008_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00008\00008_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00008\00008_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00008\00008_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00008\00008_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00008\00008_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00008\Certification Statement Plant ID 00008.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00008\Supplemental Documents\00008_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00008\Supplemental Documents\00008_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00008\Supplemental Documents\00008_PartA_WB1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00008\Supplemental Documents\00008_PartD_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
4-30-13 Line 1 Run 1 Temperature Data File Name: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\MDAS-PRO\Data\c1.MP_Lgr Recorder Start Time: 3/27/2013 7:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time Recorder Stop Time: 5/2/2013 9:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time Measurement Interval: 30Min Number of Measurements: 1733 Alarm Activated: False Printout Date: 5/2/2013 9:38:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time Logger Serial Number: 110405008 Initial Description: Alcoa Line 1 Final Comment: Tracking Number: 5067 Note: Data Format: Output All Measurements. DateTime Temperature

4/30/2013 10:51 97 4/30/2013 11:21 98.2 4/30/2013 11:51103.4 4/30/2013 12:21102.8 4/30/2013 12:51100.6 4/30/2013 13:21101.8 4/30/2013 13:51 102 4/30/2013 14:21104.4 4/30/2013 14:51104.2 4/30/2013 15:21 102 **AVG 101.64**
**Exhibit 31.3**

**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael S.Willner certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)           designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|        | /s/ MICHAEL S. WILLNER                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S.  Willner                     |
|   | *Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | Insight  Capital, Inc.             |
|   | August 14,  2007                   |

 

----
#### Paul L. MEADERS, Appellant, v. Severo VASQUEZ et ux., Appellees.

No. 12817.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 31, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 30, 1957.

Kelly, Looney, McLean & Littleton, Jackson Littleton, Edinburg, for appellant.

Henrichson, Bates & Hall, Edinburg, Luther Hughes, Weslaco, for appellees.

*852W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

In our original opinion we held that there was no evidence to show that Vasquez had ever repudiated his permissive tenancy under which he had entered upon the 100 acres of land in controversy. Meaders v. Vasquez, Tex.Civ.App., 278 S.W.2d 956.

The Supreme Court has held that in this holding we were in error, and has reversed and remanded the cause to our Court for consideration of the lesser questions of whether there is sufficient evidence to show such repudiation, and whether an implied finding by the trial court of such repudiation is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong. Vasquez v. Meaders, Tex., 291 S.W.2d 926.

Since this cause has been so remanded to us, we have read the entire statement of facts and again carefully gone over the findings of fact made by the trial court. We have read many authorities upon the subject, not only those cited by the Supreme Court but also many others. Doherty v. Jensen, Tex.Civ.App., 174 S. W.2d 77, modified Pearson v. Doherty, 143 Tex. 64, 183 S.W.2d 453; Warren v. Haverkorn, Tex.Civ.App., 191 S.W.2d 793 (Unknown Owner); St. John’s Regular Baptist Ass’n v. Long, Tex.Civ.App., 211 S.W.2d 607 (Replacement of Fence); Walton v. Woolworth, Tex.Civ.App., 222 S.W.2d 347; Federal Land Bank of Houston v. King, 132 Tex. 481, 122 S.W.2d 1061; Cox v. Kirby Lumber Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 129 S.W.2d 376.

We have definitely come to the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to show that Vasquez ever brought home to the true owner constructive notice that he was repudiating the permissive tenancy under which he admittedly entered into possession of the 100 acres, and, in any event, that such finding would be against the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence. In view of the fact that there must be another trial of this case, we deem it improper to further comment upon the evidence.

We overrule appellant’s third contention, to the effect that the evidence is insufficient to show adverse possession even if appel-lee’s claim had been hostile from the beginning and he had never been a permissive tenant upon the land. However, this point is immaterial in view of our finding that the evidence is insufficient to show that Vasquez had repudiated his permissive tenancy.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded to that court for a new trial.
#### Unice Sikes TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27316.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $150.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was probated.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.
ex_140141.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


UNSECURED SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE AGREEMENT


 


	
			$100,000

				
			April 4, 2019

			



 


For value received, CurAegis Technologies, Inc., a New York state corporation (the “Company”), promises to pay to RICHARD A. KAPLAN, the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) (the “Principal Amount”). This Note is subject to the following terms and conditions.


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Maturity. This Note is callable at the election of the holder but in no instance, will the maturity date exceed 90 days from the date of issuance, and as such is due and payable no later than July 3, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”).

			



 


	 	
			2.

				
			Interest. Simple interest shall accrue on this Note at the rate of six percent per annum (6%) and shall be payable upon repayment of the principal.

			



 


	 	
			3.

				
			Payment.  All payments shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America at such place as the Holder hereof may from time to time designate in writing to the Company. Payment shall be first credited to accrued interest then due and payable, and the remainder shall be applied to the outstanding Principal Amount. The Note may be prepaid in whole or in part from time to time by the Company.

			



 


	 	
			4.

				
			Nature of Obligation. This Note is a general unsecured obligation of the Company.

			



 


	 	
			5.

				
			Transfers: Successors and Assigns: The terms and conditions of this Note share inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Holder may not assign, pledge or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Note without prior written consent of the Company.

			



 


	 	
			6.

				
			Governing Law: This Note and all acts and transactions pursuant to the rights and obligation of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of New York, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.

			



 


	 	
			7.

				
			Subordination: The Holder acknowledges and agrees that the Company’s payment obligation under this Note is subordinated to the obligations of the Company to its lenders under any other financing facility in the event that the Company is unable to meet its obligations. In such event, no payments under this Note shall be paid to the Holder and any payment received by the Holder shall be immediately returned to the Company until such time as the Company is able to satisfy such obligations to the Lenders in full. By accepting this agreement, the Holder agrees to execute a subordination agreement with any Lender evidencing such subordination. If the terms and conditions of any subordination agreement with any Lender shall change, the Holder shall execute and deliver such further documents or instruments as such Lender may reasonably request in order to give effect to the provisions of such subordination agreement and the provisions of this Note.

			
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
			CurAegis Technologies, Inc. 


			/s/ Keith Gleasman


			Keith Gleasman


			President
<PAGE>
I, Norman Harris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diamond Triumph Auto
Glass, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003                  By:  /s/  Norman Harris
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Theundersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofInsight Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended March 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|        |   | /s/ MICHAEL S.  WILLNER                                                                      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Michael S. Willner  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  Insight Capital, Inc.         |
|   |   | May 11, 2006                                                                            |
|   |   | /s/ JOHN ABBOT                                                                               |
|   |   | John Abbot  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Insight Capital, Inc. |
|   |   | May 11, 2006                                                                            |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedMarch 6, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule II of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2005 and for the two years ended December 31, 2005included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of that report in the Company’s Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-136864,333-52876, 333-55941, and 333-55933). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 30, 2007