Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 1 of 2



### SUMMARY

(In accordance with 40 CFR part 152, this summary is available for public release after registration)

STUDY TITLE

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Ri sk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos

DATA REQUIREMENTS

NA

AUTHOR(S)

C. B. Cleveland

STUDY COMPLETED ON

5-NOV-2010

PERFORMING LABORATORY

Regulatory Laboratories—Indianapolis Lab Dow AgroSciences LLC

9330 Zionsville Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-1054

LABORATORY STUDY ID

101760Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 2 of 2



### 2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Ri sk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos

SUMMARY

The acute dietary assessment for chlorpyrifos has been updated in 2010. This assessment is a reflection of continuing changes in the chlorpyr ifos use patterns and the recently approved EPA

tolerance revisions in the cont ext of guidance for hi gher tiered dietary exposure assessments. When possible, this assessment uses monitoring data which is available primarily from USDA PDP (2003 to 2008) and also from USFDA for a few key commodities. Percent crop treated (PCT) is a key refinement factor in this type of higher tier assessment; the newest EPA SLUA was slightly adjusted using addi tional available data on percent crop treated, when appropriate. Recently implemented US use pattern changes resulting from reregistration have reduced domestic residue contributions for several highl y consumed crops. A parsing of the remaining dietary exposure between imports and domestic observations has been conducted for several key

crops.

Estimated acute dietary exposure was assessed against the existing acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) for all subpopulations established by EPA during reregistration. Currently, for the general population the aPAD is 0.005 mg/kg/day. For children and females of child-bearing years, the aPAD has an additional FQPA 10X unc ertainty factor and is 0.0005 mg/kg/day. The estimated acute dietary exposure does not exceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of the acute population adjusted dose] for the genera l US population and rele vant population subgroups

at the 99.9 th 

### percentile of exposure. (Estimated e xposures are substantially less at the 95 th



### percentile.) The estimated acute dietary expos ure for the general U.S. population at the 99.9 th



### percentile exposure was 0.000169 mg/ kg/day, or 3.4% aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the population subgroup with the highest estimat ed dietary exposure, the value was 0.000273 mg/kg/day, or 54.6% aPAD. In conclusion, acute dietary exposure to chlo rpyrifos is not of concern for the general US population and re levant subgroups (incl uding the most highly exposed population sub-group, childr en 1-2 years old) at the 99.9 th 

### percentile of exposure.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 1 of 140



### STUDY TITLE

2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Ri sk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos

DATA REQUIREMENTS

NA

AUTHOR(S)

C. B. Cleveland 317 337 3532 [cbcleveland@dow.com]



### STUDY COMPLETED ON

5-NOV-2010

PERFORMING LABORATORY

Regulatory Laboratories—Indianapolis Lab Dow AgroSciences LLC

9330 Zionsville Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-1054

LABORATORY STUDY ID

101760Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 4



### QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT

Compound: Chlorpyrifos

Title: 2010 Update of the Acute Dietar y Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos

Study Initiation Date: 01-FEB-2009 Study Completion Date: 5-NOV-2010



# NON-GLP STUDYDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 6



### TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... ............10

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... ......12 Non-Crop Uses .................................................................................................................. ........13

Model and Methods .............................................................................................................. .....13 Tiered Assessment Approach ....................................................................................................1 4 Endpoints for Dietary.......................................................................................................... .......14

RESIDUE DATA AND AVAI LABLE DISTRIBUTIONS..........................................................15

USDA PDP Data.................................................................................................................. ......15 FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program ....................................................................................16

REFINED EXPOSURE BY COMMODITY ................................................................................18

Methods for <LOD and Market Share.......................................................................................18 Baby Food...................................................................................................................... ............19 Imported vs. Domestic Foods .................................................................................................... 19

Non-included Commodities....................................................................................................... 20 Restricted Use Pattern for Pome, Stone and Grapes..................................................................20 Apple and Pear................................................................................................................. .....20

Stone Fruits................................................................................................................... ........21 Grape.......................................................................................................................... ...........21 Commodity Point Estimates and RDF Files..............................................................................22 Apples ......................................................................................................................... ..........22 Apple Juice .................................................................................................................... .......23 Apple Sauce .................................................................................................................... ......23 Asparagus...................................................................................................................... ........24 Asparagus canned ............................................................................................................... ..24

Banana ......................................................................................................................... .........24

Beans: Green Beans............................................................................................................. .25 Beans: Group 6C, Dried Shelled Bean/Peas (Excluding Soybean)......................................25 Beans: Other Peas and Beans for Group 6A and 6B ............................................................26 Beef and Other Meats except Pork .......................................................................................26Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 7



### TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)

Page

Beet, sugar .................................................................................................................... ........27

Broccoli....................................................................................................................... ..........27 Brussels sprouts ............................................................................................................... .....27 Cabbage ........................................................................................................................ ........28 Chinese cabbage ................................................................................................................ ...28

Cauliflower .................................................................................................................... .......28 Cherry ......................................................................................................................... ..........29

Citrus Other: Fruits and Juices..............................................................................................29 Collards and Turnip Greens..................................................................................................29

Corn ........................................................................................................................... ...........30

Corn: Sweet Corn............................................................................................................... ...31

Cottonseed Oil ................................................................................................................. .....31

Cranberries.................................................................................................................... ........32 Cucumber and Pumpkin and Other Squash ..........................................................................32 Fig ............................................................................................................................ .............32 Grapes ......................................................................................................................... ..........33 Grape Juice .................................................................................................................... .......33 Grape: Raisin .................................................................................................................. ......33 Grapefruit and Grapefruit juice.............................................................................................34 Kale and Other Greens within Group 5B..............................................................................34

Kiwifruit- from Hist orical FDA Data ...................................................................................35

Lemons and Limes............................................................................................................... .35 Lemon Juice (and lime juice)................................................................................................35

Lettuce ........................................................................................................................ ..........35

Milk........................................................................................................................... ............36

Mint and Mint Oils ............................................................................................................. ..36

Onion .......................................................................................................................... ..........36 Orange......................................................................................................................... ..........37Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 8



### TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)

Page

Orange Juice ................................................................................................................... ......37

Peaches........................................................................................................................ ..........38

Nectarines ..................................................................................................................... ........38 Peaches, canned ................................................................................................................ ....39

Peanuts –FDA data .............................................................................................................. .39

Peanut Butter.................................................................................................................. .......39

Pears and Pear Juice........................................................................................................... ...40 Peppers........................................................................................................................ ..........40

Plums and Prunes............................................................................................................... ...41

Pork Fat....................................................................................................................... ..........41

Pork Meat...................................................................................................................... ........42 Poultry Meat ................................................................................................................... ......42 Poultry Fat.................................................................................................................... .........42 Poultry Eggs................................................................................................................... .......43

Radish ......................................................................................................................... ..........43 Sorghum........................................................................................................................ ........43 Soybeans ....................................................................................................................... ........43 Strawberry..................................................................................................................... ........44

Sunflower...................................................................................................................... ........44

Sweet Potato ................................................................................................................... ......45

Tree Nuts...................................................................................................................... .........45 Turnip and Rutabagas ........................................................................................................... 45 Drinking Water – PDP and NAQWA Data ..........................................................................46

Wheat.......................................................................................................................... ..........46

ACUTE DIETARY ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................47 Summary Table: Calculati ons (per Capita) from DEEM Acute Assessment............................48 Commodity Contributions ........................................................................................................ .48

REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... .........50Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 9



### TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)

Page

Table 1. Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA .............................56 Table 2. Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with Tolerances.........58 Table 3. Relevant Commodities with Signi ficant Import Contributions to Overall Detections in PDP Data..............................................................................................61 Table 4. Label Use Restrictions Applicable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from Lorsban ®



### Advanced Insecticide Label .......................................................................................62 Table 5. Summary of RDF Data File Construction..................................................................64 Appendix A: DATA to Support Percentage of Imported Commodities Consumed by US Population.............................................................................................................76 Appendix B: RDF Residue files prepared for DEEM .............................................................82 Appendix C: DEEM Residue FILE INPUT ..........................................................................113 Appendix D: Summary of Re sidue Distribution Files...........................................................128 Appendix E: DEEM Analysis FILE OUTPUT .....................................................................132 Appendix F: Key Output from DEEM Critical Commodity Analysis File...........................135Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 10



### 2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Ri sk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos

ABSTRACT

The acute dietary assessment for chlorpyrifos has been updated in 2010. The assessment is a reflection of several changes in chlorpyrifos use pa tterns which occurred as a result of EPA reregistration (i.e., 2001 draft IRED, 2006 RED) a nd were designed to reduc e dietary exposure. This assessment builds on the comprehensive listing of tolerances announced by EPA via the CFR Final Rule in 2008, relies on the previous DAS assessment of February 2008, and includes new monitoring data through 2008 as posted by USDA in late 2009. USFDA monitoring data for a few commodities has also been incorporated. Minor shifts in overall percent crop treated (PCT) have occurred in the market; the newest EPA Screening Level Usage Assessment (SLUA) was slightly adjusted using internal data on percent crop treated, when appropriate. US use pattern changes have resulted in reduced domes tic residue contributi on for several highly consumed crops. A parsing of the remaining dietary exposure between imports and domestic observations has been conducted for several key crops. This dietary assessment was conducted using the recent DEEM software version 2.16. Ov er 70 individual residue files (RDF) were used in the assessment; most were created from the newer monitoring data; a very few were reused from the reregistration-era assessment conducted by EPA in 2000. Decisions for the inclusion or exclusion of specific information reflect genera l guidance for a higher tiered regulatory exposure

assessment.

Resulting exposure was assessed against the existi ng acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) for all subpopulations as establishe d by EPA during reregistration. For the general population the aPAD is 0.005 mg/kg/day. For children and female s of child-bearing years the aPAD has an additional FQPA 10X factor a nd is 0.0005 mg/kg/day. A summary of the key information per capita for the 99.9 th 

### percentile is summarized in the following table:Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 11



### Population Exposure (mg/kg/day) % aPAD @99.9 th %ile MOE (relative to

NOEL) U.S. Population 0.000169 3.39 2952 All infants 0.000211 42.14 2373 Nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000143 28.69 3486 Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000212 42.44 2356 Children 1-6 yrs 0.000253 50.63 1975 Children 7-12 yrs 0.000157 31.41 3183 Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.000185 36.96 2705 Females 13-50 yrs 0.000135 26.94 3711 Males 20+ yrs 0.000154 3.08 3247 Seniors 55+ 0.000166 3.31 3017 Children 1-2 yrs 0.000273 54.62 1830 Children 3-5 yrs 0.000225 44.95 2224 Children 6-12 yrs 0.000159 31.71 3153 Females 13-49 yrs 0.000134 26.84 3726

The estimated acute dietary exposure does not ex ceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of the acute population adjusted dose] for the general US population and relevant population subgroups at the 99.9 th 

### percentile of exposure. (Estimated exposures are substantially less at the

95 th 

### percentile.) The estimated dietary expos ure for the general U.S. population at the 99.9 th



### percentile exposure was 0.000169 mg/ kg/day, or 3.4% aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the most highly exposed population subgroup, di etary exposure was 0.000273 mg/kg/day, or 54.6% aPAD. In conclusion, acute dietar y exposure to chlorpyrifos is not of concern for the general US population and relevant subgroups (including the most highly exposed population sub-group, children 1-2 years old) at the 99.9 th 

### percentile of exposure.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 12



### INTRODUCTION

Chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro- 2-pyridinyl)-phosphorot hioate, CAS number 2921-88-2), is an organophosphate insecticide which had several changes to its use patterns as a result of the EPA reregistration (1)and rere gistration-related tolera nce revisions recently promulgated (2). The general approach used in this report follows the EPA posted policies (3, 4, 5, 6); detailed methodology follows the im plementation used in other EPA assessments (7 ,8, 9) and many of the original approaches from the EPA reregistrati on-era acute assessment (10). Market share information (11) and an unde rstanding of domestic consumption of imports for key crops are both key refinements to the diet ary assessment. Decisions for the inclusion or exclusion of specific information reflect genera l guidance for a higher tiered regulatory exposure

assessment.

As a result of reregistration, during 2008, EP A revised the comprehensive listing of over 80 tolerances for chlorpyrifos resulting from re-re gistration for food, feed and certain crop groups (2) to include revocation of tolerances on tomato es, and reduction of appl e and grape tolerances to 0.01 ppm. Most US growers had already adopt ed practices which resulted in lower residue values for these crops in the pr eceding years. The commodities included in the 2008 revised set of tolerances become the starting point for this assessment which is conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM) software (12) . For processing factors, the assessment started with defaults from within DEEM (13) , but several were refined as appropriate by processing and cooking factors used previously by EPA for chlorpyrifos (10). For this 2010 report, the updated EPA Screening Level Usage Assessment (SLUA) (14) is assessed alongside the detailed market share repor t by Gomez which DAS posted to the registration review docket for chlorpyrifos (11). Thus this refined dietar y risk assessment for chlorpyrifos is updated to reflect changes implemented since the EPA IRED which includes: 1) tolerance changes, 2) updated residue monitoring information and 3) changes in market use patterns since 2001.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 13



### In the US, Dow AgroSciences markets chlorpyrifos under the trademark of Lorsban ® 

### insecticide.

Non-Crop Uses

Most residential uses of ch lorpyrifos were phased out be tween 2000 and 2001. Moreover, DAS now supports only food and feed crop uses; DAS no longer supports uses involving golf course turf, greenhouses, non-structural wood treatments (s uch as utility poles and fence posts), ant bait stations, and adult mosquitocides (15). Severa l label changes have been made over the last decade and were completed by 2005 which have redu ced the maximum use rate in several of the crop use patterns (11,16).

Model and Methods

DEEM-FCID version 2.16 is used (12). This model from Exponent/Novigen is based on the food consumption data collected in the US DA’s Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) collected from 1994-96 a nd 1998 (94-96, 98). As a starting point, the DEEM 2000 Appendix D processing factors were used as defaults and then refined as applicable for chlorpyrifos. The highly refined assessments from the EPA 2000 acute assessment were the foundation for this update which uses the most recent government monitoring as the primary

sources of residue data: USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP ) 

### data (2003to 2008).

Percent Crop Treated (PCT) is an important parame ter in a refined Tier III/IV assessment. In an acute assessment, the focus is on the maxi mum PCT. The quantitative QUA from the 2001 IRED is now outdated. For preliminary asse ssment, EPA has produced a 2008 SLUA (Screening Level Usage Assessment) (14). In several instan ces, this screening level information can be informed by more precise data on actual lb s used per DAS Gomez 2009 report (11). Table 1 includes a conservative refinement by crop for the associated maximum PCT based on a scaling

® Trademark of Dow AgroSciences, LLCDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 14



### of lbs used. Approximately one third of th e EPA SLUA values were adjusted upwards and approximately one third downward making this da ta more appropriate for a refined dietary assessment. It is noted this appears to be c onservative and in some cases may be overestimating the adjusted maximum PCT, because it is based on a total lbs comparison instead of a deeper review of the treated acreage (which can include multiple applications in a season). In general, when no use was listed, a default assumption of 1% crop treated estimate is applied. An EPA QUA analysis is still needed for a final refinement of PCT. It is also noted that the following crops, considered in EPA’s SLUA, do not have ch lorpyrifos approved U.S. uses (11): apricots, artichoke, avocado, cantaloupes, carrots, chicory, lettuce (tolerance but no U.S. use), olives, pistachios, potatoes, seed crops, spin ach, squash, tomatoes, and watermelons.

Tiered Assessment Approach

Dietary Assessments are typically classed in a tiered approach according to the amount of refinement (17). A Tier III assessment utilizes the entire field trial residue distribution for single serving foods and the mean field trial or 95 th 

### percentile from monitoring data for processed/blended commodities and information on percent crop treated (PCT). Tier IV uses

entire residue dist ributions from statistically designed market surveys. The assessment within this report is a combination of Tier III/IV asse ssment which uses distribution information as well as point information as appropriate and also in corporates processing factors and cooking data. This is therefore an update to the similar Tier III/IV a pproach finalized by EPA in 2000.

Endpoints for Dietary

Endpoints based on cholinesterase inhibition and established by EPA as pa rt of chlorpyrifos reregistration (1) were used in this assessment. They are summarized as:Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 15



### Exposure Scenario NOAEL and Factors RfD and PAD Acute Dietary NOAEL=0.5 mg/kg/day UF = 100 FQPA = 10 (infan ts, children and females 13-50) Acute RfD =0.005 mg/kg/day Acute PAD (children and females 13-50) = 0.0005 or 5x10-4 mg/kg/day Acute PAD (general population) = 0.005 or 5x10-3 mg/kg/day Chronic Dietary NOAEL= 0.03 mg/kg/day UF= 100 FQPA = 10 (infan ts, children and females 13-50) Chronic RfD =0.0003 mg/kg/day Chronic PAD (children and females 13-50) = 0.00003 or 3x10-5 mg/kg/day Chronic PAD (general population) = 0.0003 or 3x10-4 mg/kg/day NOAEL = No Observed Adverse Effect Level; UF = Uncer tainty Factor; RfD = Reference Dose; PAD = Population Adjusted Dose (includes UF and FQPA safety factor)



### The above endpoints do not yet reflec t availability of more recent data from the chlorpyrifos comparative chlolinesterase assay study complete d in 2010 as part of the Registration Review process (18). This new study sp ecifically evaluated age-dependent differences in cholinesterase inhibition, and the results have di rect implications for reevaluation of both the POD and selection of the appropriate FQPA uncertainty f actor for use in risk assessment (19).

RESIDUE DATA AND AVAI LABLE DISTRIBUTIONS

Several sources of residue information have been us ed or reviewed in this update. If data existed in multiple residue information sources, the hierarchy of preferred use was as follows: USDA PDP > FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program > DAS Field Trial Data> Tolerance. This hierarchy prioritizes data to most appropriately approximate a “dinner plate” residue scenario whenever possible.

USDA PDP Data

Publicly available data from the USDA PDP m onitoring program (20) has been downloaded and organized into an ACCESS database for use with in Dow AgroSciences. The USDA PDP data is specifically applicable for dietary risk assessm ent because samples are prepared in a mannerDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 16



### similar to typical consumer practices, such as wa shing or peeling. Also samples are obtained at distribution centers that supply gr ocery stores, making these samples close to the consumer in the

food chain. The most recent available USDA PD P data sets for over 70 monitored commodities in 70,000 samples have been organized in a summa ry table (Table 2). The average limit of detection (LOD) value is reported for each data set. Note for beef adipose, beef liver and beef muscle that data from 2002 were used, because there was no newer data for these items. Monitoring data for commodities with no establis hed tolerance (2) are not listed in Table 2 ( e. g

. blueberries, spinach etc .) as per general guidance that regu latory exposure assessments typically do not include any noncompliant residues.

Per Table 2, no detectable residues were noted for over 1/3 of the commodities within the PDP data set: apple sauce, apple juice, cherries, beef adipose, beef liver, b eef muscle, grape juice, canned green beans, canned peaches, frozen sweet peas, sweet corn, frozen sweet corn, peanut butter, potatoes and frozen potatoes, wheat flour, milk, heavy cream, onions, prunes, pork muscle, poultry, pear juice, four types of water and watermelon. Only 11 data sets had detection rates above 5%. Very low detect ion rates of <1% to 5% were obs erved in the remainder of the other sample sets. The recent PDP data inform ation on water is congruent with historical drinking water monitoring data which shows neglig ible detectable residue s in finished drinking water supplies (21, 22, 23).

FDA Surveillance Monitoring Program

To provide information on cabbage, kiwi and pe anuts not covered by USDA PDP, FDA data was used. FDA data is collected primarily for to lerance enforcement purposes and samples are not typically washed or peeled. Th e collection points for FDA samp les are across the channels of

commerce and are intended to be closer to the farm gate rather than the dinner plate. The published FDA monitoring data (24) from years 2004 to 2007 has been reviewed for this updated assessment. During the preparation of this data set in the summer/ fall of 2010, the public

downloads of the FDA data from 2004 to 2006 are noted as temporarily un available (24); dataDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 17



### for a subset of commodities was requested and obta ined from Ronald Roy (25). For peanuts and kiwi historical FDA data was ultimately used.

For 2007, residue data sets were prepared using the downloade d FDA Surveillance monitoring SMPL2007.TXT file (26); this file is analytical data for each individual sample, as entered by FDA field chemists. Information on multiple pesticides is contained within this file, so the data was filtered to gain data associated with “Chlor pyrifos” or “No residue found”; all other entries were discarded. Because the file contains analys is for multiple pesticides and there is no single method which covers all pesticid es, it can not be assumed that the “no residue found” results automatically applies to chlorpyrifos. To de termine if chlorpyrifos was covered when "NO RESIDUE FOUND" is reported, information with in the fields named ExtCode (extraction methods) and DetCode (detection methods) was used (27). The codes from these two fields were compared to the values associated with CHLORPYRIFOS or the NO DECTECTIONS in the corresponding methods file (eg METH2003.TXT) wh ich lists how each pesticide is covered by the particular analytical methods used by FDA. Rows of data associated with methods which were not associated with chlorpyrifos were discar ded. Due to the unspecified nature of the “999”

extraction and “99” detection code s, there were some values of “no residue found” that could not be definitively associated or di sassociated with chlorpyrifos. To remain conservative, these data

rows were not included in the count of no detect ions. Finally the file was culled for duplicate sample numbers to ensure only one sample was included in final counts for distribution.

Because the primary purpose of the FDA analyses is enforcement, information on LOD or LOQ (limit of quantitation) values is not posted dire ctly with the observations. Additionally, for a given commodity, FDA data may be limited for any given year; as such, results are combined for all years. In 2000, EPA used an estimate of 1⁄2 LOD = 0.00015 ppm and 1⁄2 LOQ = 0.0005 ppm for chlorpyrifos in all commodities for all samp les analyzed by the FDA Surveillance Monitoring program; these were based on a memorandum by S. Hummel, 2/26/99, “LOQs for FDA Monitoring Data” (10). However this appear s too low based on general information on the LOQs associated with the FDA Pesticide Anal ytical Manual (PAM) methods found in Section 105 of the PAM manual (28). Those posted L OQs are typically 0.015 ppm, which leads to aDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 18



### general LOD of 0.005 ppm and 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025 pp m. For this updated assessment, the following 1⁄2 LOD values will be used for FDA data. For 302 and 303 methods a 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025 ppm will be used. For 304 methods, the LOQ posted is 0.03 which leads to a 1⁄2 LOD = 0.005ppm.

REFINED EXPOSURE BY COMMODITY

Methods for <LOD and Market Share

For the field trial and DAS generated data, the ND (non detects) below the LOD will be set to 1⁄2 of the LOD (for the method). The appropriate number of zeros will be added to represent the percentage of expected non-treated samples based on the market share estimates (PCT).

In the governmental monitoring data sets for non -blended and partially blended commodities (3), the number of reported <LOD values which are set to 1⁄2 LOD will be determined by the percent crop treated by solving for x :

(# detectable residue + x )/ (total number of samp les) = PCT (as a decimal)

The remainder of the values will be set to zero:

Number zero = total number samples - # detectable - # set at 1⁄2 LOQ

Any values reported as < LOQ or Trace will be set at 1⁄2 LOQ.

To use monitored distributions of blended comm odities, none of the ND values are set to zero based on market share; instead the 1⁄2 LOD value is in corporated for all. Often it is preferable to use the average of the crop field trial and then adjust this by multiplying by the PCT.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 19



### When appropriate for import residues, the PCT ma y be adjusted to reflect either key treated imports or non-treatment of imports.

When multiple LODs are reported within a data set, the weighted average of the LODs from

treated commodities in which no residues are detected (5) is calculated as implied by Table 1B of the methomyl assessment (9).

Baby Food

Based on an aldicarb example (8), “babyfoods” in DEEM were typically tr eated exactly like their non-baby food counterpart, i.e. used the same PCT, distribution f iles or residue information and the same processing or cooking factors. This assessment of baby food likely overestimates exposure, because baby foods are more highly processed (with more opportunity for loss of residues) and baby food companies often have esta blished low residue policies for growers who produce commodities for use in baby foods.

Imported vs. Domestic Foods

The PDP data in Table 2 was reviewed for re sidue contributions from imported versus domestically grown produce. For several commod ities, the majority of the summed detectable residue in PDP arises from imported samples. For example in the 2007 nectarine data set (563 total observations), the rate of observable residues in the do mestic samples was 2% (6 out of 347) but for imported samples the observation ra te of detectable resi dues was 39% (83 out of 212). Similarly for peaches, the rate of detectab le residues in the domestic samples was 4% but 46% for imports. Table 3 summarizes the PDP da ta sets with significant import percentages.

Table 3 also includes values for the percenta ge of import/domestic production. These values were derived from queries of the USDA FAO PSD online database (29) and USDA’s ERS service data (30,31) as summarize d in Appendix A as well as commodity web searches (32).Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 20



### In each case, the PDP data set for the imports is greater than 100 samples and thus large enough to separate into a domestic residue distribution and an import residue distribution which is then weighted by the percent of impor t consumption by the US population.

Non-included Commodities

Decisions for the inclusion or ex clusions of specific information reflect general guidance for a higher tiered regulatory exposure assessment. For example, there is no tolerance established for

blueberries but the 2007 - 2008 PDP data found a 1% detection rate of low level residue. These values are not included in the dietary DEEM file , because they represent noncompliant imports. Similarly, the low level detections in spinach (3 %) and tomatoes (<3%) as well as the residues in imported catfish are not associated with approved uses or tolerance and were not included in this regulatory assessment.

Restricted Use Pattern for Pome, Stone and Grapes

The majority of the crops in Table 3 have use patterns in US domes tic production designed to minimize residues, such as dormant and trunk only treatments for pome and stone fruit, dormant and post-harvest vine-only treatments for grapes and a revoked toleran ce with no approved use for tomatoes. See Table 4 for a sp ecific list of label statements.

Apple and Pear

Applications to apples are re stricted to a single annual appl ication, either as a pre-bloom dormant/delayed dormant spray to the canopy or the trunk, or a post-bloo m application to the

lower 4 feet of the trunk. Conf irmation of the low residues from this domestic use patterns is provided by an IR-4 Apple MOR study in 2003 (33). Six apple trials were conducted across five states. In this study, each treated plot received two trunk-directed applica tions of test substance

with 1.5 qt of Lorsban ® 

### 4E insecticide/100 gal spray with PHI of 28 to 30 days. (The study was

conducted under broader conditions than the curren t label which is restricted to only a singleDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 21



### application up to 4 pts/acre) No residues above the reported Lowest Level of Method Validation (LLMV) of 0.01 ppm were observed in any of th e samples. This limited use pattern was an outcome of the IRED (1) and is designed to sign ificantly reduce the residu e exposure in apples; it is supported by the 2008 EPA action to lowe r the apple toleran ce to 0.01 ppm (2).

Stone Fruits

Uses in peaches and nectarines are restricted to ei ther: predip/preplant or dormant/delayed dormant spray to the canopy or a post-bloom applica tion to the lower 4 feet of the trunk. They are restricted to a sing le application annually.

Cherries are similarly restricted to predip/pre plant or dormant/delayed dormant spray to the canopy or a post-bloom application to the lower 4 f eet of the trunk. There is the ability to apply thrice annually in cherries.

Plum and prune uses are restricted to dormant/d elayed dormant spray only. There is no approved use in apricots or other stone fruits.

Grape

Per Table 4, grape usage is restricted to pre-bl oom, dormant/delayed dormant, or soil surface applications in certain geographic regions; no foli ar sprays are allowed. These use limitations

are understood to limit the residue potential in grapes and is supported by the 2008 EPA action to reduce the grape tolerance to 0.01 ppm (2). With that 2008 action, it is now incumbent upon exporting regions to the US to comply with the imposed tolerance. DAS has confirmed that for export, Chilean growers have cha nged their application patterns fo r chlorpyrifos in table grapes; they apply only till flowering and have residu e monitoring programs in place prior to export to ensure compliance with the US standard (34).Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 22



### Commodity Point Estimates and RDF Files

Over 70 RDF files built primarily from PDP information were used for this assessment within the DEEM acute procedures. Point estimates fo r average residues were also used for several blended commodities. The details for data pa rsing for each commodity follows and are also

summarized in Table 5. The RDF files are found in Appendix B.

Apples

Apples are a highly consumed commodity that greatly impact the exposure estimates for children. An apple RDF file for use in the D EEM acute procedures has been built based on available PDP data and PCT information. A signif icant change to the a pple use pattern occurred as a result of the 2000 IRED (1). Post-bloom folia r applications to apples were discontinued (35) and the tolerance on apples was lowered to 0.01 ppm (2) as supported by the IR-4 apple MOR study for trunk applications (33). PDP data for 2004 and 2005 is available and it includes 17

observed residues and 1487 observations of no det ections at LODs of either 0.004 or 0.0012 ppm at an average weighted LOD of 0.002012 ppm. However, it is also noted that the existing data contains two import detections in 2004 and 2005 that are now over the 2008 imposed tolerance level of 0.01 ppm. For this updated 2010 asse ssment those two observations have been conservatively used although it could be more a ppropriate to truncate t hose observations to the legal limit of 0.01 ppm. The EPA 2008 SLUA (14) estimates a maximum of 65% crop treated for domestic apples, however Table 1 indicates a more realistic valu e is 67% (11). From all this information, the apple RDF#7 file is construc ted with 17 observations, 496 true zeros and 991 entries at 1⁄2 the average we ighted LOD of 0.001006 ppm.

RDF#7 is applicable for the DEEM entries of Apple, fruit with peel. RDF#7 is also used for Apple, peeled fruit ( for all but the “canned” food form) along with a processing factor of 0.15X for peeling which was documented and used fo r several commodities in EPA’s 2000 assessment (10). Per the 2000 chlorpyrifos asse ssment, the canned apple food forms Apple, fruit with peel

and Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood are more similar to apple sauce; see below.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 23



### Dried apples were treated as a “blended” commod ity per the methomyl assessment (9). Based on the data within RDF#7 the point es timate becomes (0.0932 + (991*0.0001006))/1504 = 0.000128 ppm. The point estimate was applied to Apple, dried, and Apple, dried-babyfood foods in DEEM along with the default processing factors of 8X for drying and 0.1 5X for peeling (10).

Apple Juice

In 2002, PDP data indicated no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos were present in apple juice even prior to the apple use pattern change. Current PDP data from 2007 and 2008 have

reconfirmed the lack of detectable residues in juice. Based on a value of 67 PCT (Table 1), the 368 non-detected levels in jui ce at an average LOD of 0.006272 ppm were parsed as 121 true

zeros and 247 values at 1⁄2 L OD = 0.00313 ppm for the PDP in RDF#8. This file was initially applied to Apple, juice and A pple, juice-babyfood in DEEM. However, children diets are highly affected by the consumption of apple juice. In this refined assessment the exposure to children was dominated by the 1⁄2 LOD. Hence, for this assessment the RDF#7 on apples with the 0.3X juice factor observed in grapes and translated to apple jui ce commodities. A processing study conducted in Europe suggests the 0. 3X is conservative as an apple juice processing factor; in the Northern Europe processing study for French appl es (with applications at BBCH growth stage 55), a 0.03X factor reduction was observed for juice (36).

Apple Sauce

In 2002, PDP data indicated no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos were pr esent in apple sauce, even prior to the apple use pa ttern change. The newer 2006 PDP data for apple sauce confirms no observations of chlorpyrifos residues in 714 samples at an average LOD = 0.002047. Thus for apple sauce, the 67 PCT was applied to th e 2006 PDP data and was used to create RDF#9

with 236 true zeros and 478 values at 1⁄2 the LOD = 0.001024 ppm and applied to Apple, sauce and Apple, sauce-babyfood

. 

### Per above, RDF#9 was also applie d to the canned food forms of Apple, fruit with peel and Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 24



### Asparagus

As of 2008 (2), asparagus has onl y a regional tolerance in the Midwest and Pacific NW states. Refreshed 2008 PDP data contained 372 samples, 341 of these (92%) were imports and there were 11 observable residues (3% of these sample s) with an average LOD = 0.01503 ppm. In the remaining 31 domestic samples, there were no observable residues with an average LOD of 0.01255 ppm. Table 3 indicates US consumption of imported asparagus is ~ 57%. Given the over-sampling of imports in the 2008 dataset, the 2008 and 2003 PDP data sets were combined to produce a domestic data RDF#2 and an import data set RDF#1 for asparagus. In DEEM these were weighted as 0.57 for imports and 0.43 for domestic consumption. The Table 1 estimate for

PCT was 44%. Thus the RDF#2 for domestic asparagus contained 4 residues, 116 zeros and 87 at 0.002544 ppm (1/2 the LOD). RDF#2 for impo rted asparagus contained 17 residues, 287 zeros and 209 at 0.005642 ppm. These files we re applied against al l asparagus food forms except the canned ones; see below.

Asparagus canned

In 2003, PDP collected separate data set for canne d asparagus. There was no evidence that the canned distribution had over-sampled imports: only 13 of the 354 samples were noted as imports and given the nature of the canne d distribution, there was no need to create a separate import file. There were 6 observable residues (a 2% detection rate). The PCT of 44 was applied to create an RDF#3 with 6 residues, 198 values at 0.002 ppm (a t 1⁄2 LOD), and 150 zeros. This file was used for canned asparagus in DEEM.

Banana

Exposure to chlorpyrifos via bananas is minimal. The PD P 2006-08 data se t contains 1486 samples with 3 observable residues at 0.0063 ppm and an average LOD of 0.003713 ppm. In 2000, BEAD estimated 14% of imported bananas ar e likely treated with chlorpyrifos (10). RDF#4 (3 residue, 1278 zeros and 205 at 0.00186 ppm as 1⁄2 LOD) was used for all banana

commodities in DEEM. For Banana, dried and Banana, dried-babyfood a default processing factor of 3.9 was added. The assumption of 14 fo r PCT was likely conservative based on the fact

there is a <1% detection ra te. (3 out of 1483 samples).Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 25



### Beans: Green Beans

Several sets of PDP data on green beans exist. The most recent years of PDP posted data for fresh green beans is 2007 and 2008. For canned green beans the 2003-04 data is available and for frozen green beans 2005. Table 1 indica tes a maximum PCT of 7%. RDF#42 was built using the fresh green bean PDP data with 7 PCT, 1376 true zeros, 14 observation, and 90 values of 0.001714 ppm as 1⁄2 averaged LOD. This file wa s applied to the fresh food and dried forms of Bean, snap, succulent in DEEM and to Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood. For the canned form of green beans, a total of 928 observations were made with no detections of chlorpyrifos noted.

RDF#43 was constructed to reflect this data. The file contained 65 values at 0.00236 ppm which was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD and 863 true zeros. It was applied to the canned forms of snap beans in DEEM. For the 555 analyses of frozen forms of green beans, 1 residue of chlorpyrifos was

noted. RDF#59 consisted of the one observed value at 0.007 ppm, 38 values at 0.002285 ppm = 1⁄2 the averaged LOD and 516 true zeros.

Beans: Group 6C, Dried Shelled Bean/Peas (Excluding Soybean)

Use of chlorpyrifos on dried le gume commodities is limited to s eed treatments at planting. All treatments are conducted at the same rate, and the tolerance of 0.05 ppm was based on nondetectable residues in field tria ls (10). Updated market inform ation in Table 1 indicates a 2% maximum PCT. The approach used in 2000 (7) is updated for the estimation of residue based on the results of the field trials: 1⁄2 the tolerance (because there were no detectable residues in the field trials) times 2% crop treated was used as a point estimate for the entire dried bean/peas blended commodities. The anticipated residue is 0.025 ppm X 2% CT = 0.0005 ppm. The value was applied in DEEM to the following entries : Bean, black, seed; Bean, broad, seed; Bean, cowpea, seed; Bean, great northern, seed; Bean, kidney, seed; Bean, lima, seed; Bean, mung, seed; Bean, navy, seed; Bean, pink, seed; Bean, pi nto, seed; Chickpea, seed; Chickpea, seedbabyfood; Chickpea, flour; Guar, seed; Guar, se ed-babyfood; Lentil, seed; Pea, dry; Pea, drybabyfood; Pea, pigeon, seed.

In 2008, PDP found no detection in canned Kidney beans in 164 samples at an average LOD of 0.01742 ppm. Based on 2% CT, a legume canned bean RDF#99 was constructed with 2 values ofDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 26



### 0.00871 ppm and 98 true zeros. This was applied to the canned forms of Bean, kidney, seed ; Bean, navy, seed; Bean, great northern, seed.

Beans: Other Peas and Beans for Group 6A and 6B

No significant changes in usage for green peas or lima beans have been noted. However without additional data, the 2008 unrefined SLUA value of 5 PCT was used in this assessment. The PDP data for fresh green beans was translated using 5 PCT; RDF#60 wa s constructed with 14

observations and 1406 true zeros and 60 values at 0.001714 ppm (1/2 LOD). This file was applied to green peas in 6A ( Pea, edible podded, succulent) and all DEEM foods in 6B ( Bean, broad, succulent; Bean, cowpea, succulent; Bean, lima, succulent; Pea, succulent; Pea, succulent-babyfood; Pea, pigeon, succulent ).

In addition, the 2003 plus 2006 PDP data for froz en, sweet peas contained over 1293 analyses

with no observations noted and a 1⁄2 LOD of 0.00201 ppm. RDF#98 was built using a PCT of 5

with 1228 true zeros and 65 values at 1⁄2 LOD of 0.002014 ppm. It was applied to frozen food

forms within 6B of bean, lima, succulent; pea, su cculent; pea, pigeon, succulent

.

Beef and Other Meats except Pork

The most recent data for beef comes from the 2002 PDP samplings of beef adipose (301 samples), beef liver (312 samples) and beef muscle (309 samples). No detections of chlorpyrifos above the LOD of 2.8 ppb were observed in an y of the samples. Meat commodities are nonblended. In the 2000 EPA acute analysis (10), it wa s stated 20% of the values in the RDF should be at 1⁄2 LOD. This same approach was taken with updated data to crea te an RDF#37 with 20 values at 0.0014 ppm which is half the LOD and 80 values of true zero s. This file was applied to the following entities in DEEM: Beef, meat, Beef, meat-babyfood, Beef, meat, dried, Beef, meat byproducts, Beef, meat byproducts -babyfood, Beef, fat, Beef,fat- babyfood, Beef, kidney, Beef, liver, and Beef, liver-babyfood . Following the EPA 2000 assessment (10), this file was also applied to horse, sheep and goat commodities in DEEM as well: Horse, meat; Goat, meat; Goat, meat byproducts; Goat, fat ;Goat, kidney; Goat, liver; Sheep , meat; Sheep, meat-babyfood; Sheep, meat byproducts; Sheep, fat; Sheep, fat-babyfood; Sheep, kidney; and Sheep, liver

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 27



### Beet, sugar

Label changes for sugar beets include a reductio n in the maximum seasonal rate and a reduced number of applications allowed. Sugar beets are a blended commodity used to produce sugar and molasses. No direct PDP data on sugar beets was available. Translation procedures used by EPA in 2000 (10) for sugar beets from sweet pot atoes was used for this assessment. The 2008 PDP data has a detection rate of only 2%, howev er the 2003 PDP data set contained a detection rate of 15%. To be conservative the 2003, 2004 a nd 2008 data sets were used. A blended sweet potato point estimate was calculated based on 21 PCT with the 165 observed residues which summed to 0.9252 ppm, plus 179 samples were se t at the averaged 1⁄2 LOD of 0.001071 ppm.

This information was then translated to sugar beets point estimate as (0.9252+ 179*0.001071)/1639 = 0.000681 ppm. This value was applied to DEEM food of Beet, sugar, Beet, sugar-babyfood, Beet, sugar, molasses, and Beet, sugar, molasses-babyfood . In addition for the sugar forms, the processing factor of 0.1X previously used by EPA was also included.

Broccoli

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in ve getables for broccoli included a restriction to 3 applications per season and an addition of a 10 -day retreatment interval. Applicable PDP data is available for 2006, 2007, and 2008 in broccoli. There were 108 observed residues noted ranging from 0.038 to 0.002 ppm and 1367 “no dete ctions” noted with a lower LOD of 0.0012 ppm. Based on Table 1, a PCT of 37 was use d. An RDF#17 was created with 108 values, 929 true zeros and 438 values at 0.0006 ppm (1/2 av eraged LOD). This file was applied to Broccoli

, Broccoli-babyfood Broccoli

, Chinese Broccoli raab.

Brussels sprouts

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in vegetables including Bru ssels sprouts included a

restriction to 3 a pplications per season and an addition of a 10-day retreatment interval. Previously, up to 6 applications we re allowed for Brussels sprouts

. No update to the PCT for Brussels sprouts was available so per the EPA 2000 assessment, the Broccoli PDP data was translated and applied to Brussels sprouts in DEEM using the 2000 BEAD estimate of 91 PCT (10). Because the translation was to a crop with a higher PCT, the number of observationsDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 28



### needed to be increased by a factor of 91/37 to make 266 values, so the 108 residue values were repeated twice and then the remaining 50 values were added as the av erage (0.00426 ppm) repeat

from the broccoli file. Thus RDF#28 was crea ted with the 266 observations, 1077 values at

0.0006 = 1⁄2 LOD and 133 zeros.

Cabbage

Changes to the labeled uses of chlorpyrifos in vegetables including cabbage included a restriction to 3 applicatio ns per season and the addition of a 10-day retreatment interval. Table 1 indicates an adjusted PCT of 22 is appropriate. Received FDA data (25) for cabbage from 2004

to 2006 contained 193 observations of which 160 were domestic. Two observed residues were noted (one domestic at 0.002 ppm and one im port at 0.04 ppm). The 2007 downloaded data for cabbage contained 1 observed residue at 0.012 pp m and 61 “no residue found” entries. LOD of 0.005 ppm is assumed from a review of the methods and this conservatively congruent with the LOQ of 0.01 ppm communicated by FDA (25). RDF#22 was built using the 3 observation of with 53 values at 0.0025 ppm as 1⁄2 LOD and 199 true zeros. This file was applied to DEEM entry of Cabbage

.

Chinese cabbage

Cabbage data was translated to DEEM entries for Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy ;Cabbage, Chinese, napa and Cabbage, Chinese, mustard assuming a PCT of 5%. Thus a RDF#23 was created from the 255 observations for cabbage an d scaled by the 5 % crop treated assumption for a total of 242 zeros, 10 values at 0.0025 ppm and 3 observations.

Cauliflower

For cauliflower, the 2004, 2005 and 2006 PDP data co ntained 1484 analyses with 8 detections of chlorpyrifos above the average LOD of 0.001798 ppm. Based on the Table 1 adjusted PCT value of 46%, RDF#27 was built using the 1492 tota l samples with 8 detections, 678 values at 0.0009 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 806 true zeros. This file was applied to DEEM food for Cauliflower

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 29



### Cherry

The data from the 2007 PDP monitoring for cherry show no detectable residues of chlorpyrifos in the 419 sample tested. Based on the adjust ed SLUA estimate of 53% as the maximum PCT for cherries (Table 1), a cherry RDF#33 wa s built with 222 values at 0.001365 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD

and 197 true zeros. This file was applied to fresh or fresh cooked food forms within the Cherry group in DEEM. The file was also used for processed and frozen food forms as well as Cherrybabyfood. RDF#33 was also used for Cherry juice and Cherry, juice-babyfood along with the 0.3X grape juice processing factor.

Citrus Other: Fruits and Juices

The current PDP data from orange s (see below) was translated to other citrus (tangerine and citrons) using the estimated PC T maximum of 10% (Table 1). RDF#24 was built using the 1483 total samples with 34 orange resi dues values, 114 values at 0.002 ppm and 1335 true zeros. This file was applied to DEEM foods for Citrus citron, Citrus hybrids, Kumquats, Tangerine

.

Similar to EPA 2000 assessment, tangerine juice wa s translated from updated PDP orange juice

data based on 10 PCT for other citrus. The 4 obser vations in the orange juice were used in RDF

#31 with 1338 true zeros and 145 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD. This file was applied to Tangerine, juice in DEEM.

A Citrus, oil tolerance of 20 ppm was refined by multiplication by the 10% PCT for an adjusted point estimate of 2 ppm.

Collards and Turnip Greens

There is 2006, 2007 and 2008 PDP data for collards containing a total of 679 samples with 22

observed residues. Within the 2007 PDP data one of the samples was an outlier and was marked

in the PDP database as a violati on of the established tolerance. It is also exac tly 1000-fold the reported detection limit and is a potential mis-transposition of ppb to ppm. Nonetheless for conservatism, the value was retained for this analysis. No new information for PCT for collard isDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 30



### available; therefore the 2000 BE AD PCT estimate of 13% was reused to build RDF#20 with 22 observed residues, 591 true zeros and 66 values at 1⁄2 the average LOD = 0.002074 ppm.

In 2000, BEAD estimated a PCT of 19% for root and tuber vegetables (10); this value is maintained. The 2006 through 2008 collard PDP data was translated to turnip greens using the

19% PCT value. The RDF#55 was built with the 22 observations plus a repeat 7 times of the median value (0.011 ppm) to scale upwards for the upward difference of 13 to 19 PCT. The resulting file contained 556 true zeros, 101 values at 0.002074 ppm (1/2 average LOD) and 29 observed residues and was applied to Turnip, greens in DEEM

.



### Corn

Due to newer GMO corn products and label revisions , there has been a decline in overall sales of chlorpyrifos for use on corn. Label revisions include a lower maximum seasonal rate and new restrictions on the number of app lications allowed per season. Ta ble 1 indicates an adjusted 4% PCT. PDP data for raw corn grain is availa ble for 2006-2008. The data set reveals a large percentage of detections (24%) at trace levels (on average 3.1 ppb) . This high detection rate is incongruent with DAS and EPA pr ojections of PCT for corn at 5% or less but instead is a reflection of the very low detect ion limit used (1 ppb or 0.001 ppm) a nd the fact that stored grain is a blended commodity and theref ore low level residues may be in stead blended to trace levels in the commodity chain. Because corn is blende d, the anticipated residue in corn based on the PDP data set assuming the full background of 1⁄2 LOD would =0.00111035 ppm. This results in a higher value than using data from actual fiel d trials. Therefore methodology employed in the EPA 2000 acute assessment will be reused. The original assessment used acceptable field trial

data to calculate an acute an ticipated residue in corn at 0.00088 ppm based upon average field trial results of 0.011 ppm and 8.0 % crop treated (10) . Based on revised market data with a PCT of 4%, a residue value of 0.00044 ppm is now appropria te. Given the changes to the label, this is still likely an overestimation of current resi dues. This value was applied the DEEM food Corn, field, bran

. 

### To convert corn grain data to corn syr up, a processing factor of 0.05 was used (37) in

DEEM for Corn, field, syrup and Corn, field, syrup-babyfood . This value is supported by the fact that no observable residues in corn syr up were found in the 1998 and 1999 PDP corn syrupDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 31



### program in which 454 samples were analyzed ac ross 2 years for 82 pesticides and no observable residues were observed in any of the samples (38). For corn oil, a processing factor of 4.5 was used (37) for Corn, field, oil and Corn, field, oil-babyfood . A processing factor of 0.22 was included for the processed and milled products ba sed on EPA’s assessment of data available for agrain washing study (39, 40) and an understand ing of corn processing (10). Thus 0.00044 ppm was used as the residue and 0.22 as the pro cessing factor for the following in DEEM: Corn, field, flour; Corn, field, flour-babyfood; Corn, field, meal; Corn, fiel d, meal-babyfood; Corn, field, starch; Corn, field, starch-babyfood.

Corn: Sweet Corn

The EPA recent SLUA noted a maximum of 15 PCT, however the DAS adjustments indicates a

PCT value of 18% is more refined. PDP data is available in 2008 for fr esh sweet corn, frozen

sweet corn was monitored in 2003 and 2008 PDP data . In all recent data sets no observable

detections have been noted. All total there are PDP 1426 observations and no detections of chlorpyrifos residues in sweet co rn. Also note, pop corn uses have been eliminated from the

labels for Lorsban ® 

### 4E and 15G insecticides. Based on the increase in usage, RDF# 97 for fresh

corn was built with 125 true ze ros and 27 values at 0.007217 ppm (1⁄2 average LOD) for use in

DEEM for Corn, sweet and Corn, sweet-babyfood . RDF# 96 for frozen sweet corn was built with 476 true zeros and 104 values at 0.002347 ppm (1⁄2 aver age LOD) for use with frozen food forms. This represents a conservative unrefinement of sorts, because a value of zero was applied to sweet corn in the 2000 EPA procedures (10).

Cottonseed Oil

With the introduction of GMO cotton, DAS has previ ously documented a decline from 6% to 5% for PCT of chlorpyrifos in cott on (41). Thus the general appr oach for cotton used in the 2000 acute assessment has been adjusted for a 5% PC T. The average residue from field trials (0.12 ppm) and a reduction factor of 0.375 for proce ssing results in a 0.045 ppm anticipated residue (AR) in cottonseed oil (37). Because cottonseed oil is a blended commodity, multiplication of this AR by 5% crop treated yields 0.0 0225 ppm which was used in DEEM for: Cottonseed, oil

and Cottonseed, oil-babyfood

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 32



### Cranberries

PDP 2006 data set for cranberries has a total of 71 observed residues and 245 “no detects”. The EPA update to the PCT in Table 1 is 70%. This information was used to construct RDF#16 with 71 observed residues, 150 values at an averag ed 1⁄2 LOD value of 0.00233 ppm and 95 true zeros. This file was applied to Cranberry

, Cranberry-babyfood and Cranberry, dried Foods in DEEM.

RDF#16 was also used for Cranberry, juice and Cranberry, juice-babyfood along with the juice processing factor of 0.3X per the 2000 acute assessment (10).

Cucumber and Pumpkin and Other Squash

PDP monitoring data was availa ble for cucumbers for 2003 and 2004 and the data set contained a total of 1296 analyses with a 2% detection rate for chlorpyrifos. Table 1 indicates an adjusted PCT of 6% is appropriate for cucumber. RDF#53 was built with the 25 detections, 53 values at 0.002 ppm ( 1⁄2 LOD) and a balance of 1218 true zeros and applied to Cucumber in DEEM.

Cucumber and Pumpkin both be long to Group 9B, so similar to the 2000 assessment, the cucumber data was translated to pumpkin (10) and a maximum value of 7% is associated with pumpkins which is an increase from the 1 PCT from the BEAD Quantitative Usage Analysis from 2000 (42). RDF#95 was built with the 25 det ections, 66 values at 1⁄2 LOD and a balance of 1205 true zeros and applied to Pumpkin in DEEM.

It is also noted that PDP data from 2006 to 2008 contains observed residues at low detection rates in summer squash at <1%, and from 2004 to 2006 in winter squash at <2%. However, there is no tolerance established in commodities and no legal use for these commodities. These data are not included in the assessment for approved uses.

Fig

Table 1 contains no PCT estimates for figs. There is no PDP data collected in figs. The tolerance value was used with a 1 % PCT assumption (per BEAD 2000 QUA). The RDF #41 contains 1 value of 0.01 ppm and 99 zeros. This file was applied to DEEM foods: Fig and Fig, dried

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 33



### Grapes

Per Table 3, imported grapes make up 54% of the consumed grapes in the US. In the recent 2004 and 2005 PDP data set, 52% of the samples were domestically sourced, 47% were imported and 1% was of unknown origin. Ho wever a large difference in the detection rate was observed in domestic vs. imports; there was a 23% detecti on rate in the imports but only a 2% detection rate in the domestic samples. To make use of this information, two RDF files were created: one for domestic residues and one for imports.

For domestic use, Table 1 shows an increase to 6% PCT for domestic use of chlorpyrifos in table grapes. RDF# 56 was built with 15 observations, 31 1⁄2 LOD values of 0.001932 ppm and 715 true zeros. This RDF file was weighted by a 0.46 factor in DEEM and applied to Grape

.

For imports, most importantly, it is noted that 40% of the historical observations in 2004 and 2005 PDP data are above the 2008 tolerance of 0.01 pp m (2). With tolerance enforcement, for imports, there is now reduced exposure to chlorpyr ifos and thus values above tolerance value in the import set have been truncated to the tole rance value of 0.01 ppm within the imported PDP data set. And 100% PCT for imports is cons ervatively assumed. RDF#94 was built using 165 observations (some truncated), and 547 1⁄2 LOD values of 0.001793. This file was weighted by 0.54 in DEEM and was applied to Grape

.

Grape Juice

The 2008 PDP data on grape juice was available, with 745 samples, an average LOD of 0.0042 ppm and no detections. Both domestic and impor ted juice was sampled. Because grape juice is blended, an average value of 1⁄2 LOD of 0.0021 ppm was used for grape juice with no PCT adjustment.

Grape: Raisin

The 2006 and 2007 PDP monitoring data for raisins has a detection rate of 1% for observed residues. Domestic production of raisins is very large in the US. Review of Production Supply and Distribution for the US (43) allows for a de termination of the relative importance of theDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 34



### imports relative to the consumption of US do mestic produce (See Appendix A); imported raisins

contribute ~ 10% to the US consum er diet. The PDP data set is primarily domestic and imports are under sampled. In 2000, BEAD estimated 1% as the PCT (42), but used 7% based on a final detection rate in fresh grapes (10). A similar pr ocedure is conservatively used and is presumed adequate to account for the 10% imported raisins. The revised domestic 6% grape PCT detection

is used with the raisin PDP data. RDF#54 was constructed with 5 observa tions, 699 true zeros, and 40 values of 0.002581 ppm which was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD. This was applied to Grape,

raisin in DEEM and no processi ng factors were needed.

Grapefruit and Grapefruit juice

PDP data from 2005 and 2006 for grapefruit cont ained 24 observed residues and 1461 values below the level of detection. Analyses were performed at two LODs; the average LOD was calculated to be 0.001727 ppm. Ta ble 1 indicates a revised maxi mum PCT of 23 for grapefruit; RDF#26 was built with 24 observed residues, 31 8 values at 0.000863= 1⁄2 average LOD and 1143 zeros. This file was applied to Grapefruit and Pummelo in DEEM. For Grapefruit juice , RDF# 26 was applied with the 0.3X juicing factor.

Kale and Other Greens within Group 5B

PDP contains data on Kale from 2006-2008, with 802 observations and a detection rate of 4.5%. No updated PCT for kale was produced and the 2000 BEAD PCT estimate was 1% (10). For

this assessment a PCT of 5% was assumed base d on the detection rate. RDF#40 was built using the 36 observed residues, 762 true zeros and 4 values of 0.001928 ppm (1⁄2 the average LOD).

In 2000, BEAD estimated 1% PCT for Kohlrabi and Mustard Greens (10, 42) and in the 2000

acute assessment translated data from collards wa s applied to cover these crops (10). For this updated assessment the kale RDF#40 is conservatively used for application in DEEM to

Kohlrabi

, Mustard greens and Rape, greens

.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 35



### Kiwifruit- from Historical FDA Data

There is very limited new data for kiwis. The F DA data for kiwi in 2007 contains 4 observations and no detections. The requested 2004 to 2006 FDA data (25) for kiwi contains 17 null observations and 1 observed residue of 0.02 ppm. Because no additional data was available, the EPA 2000 kiwi data was reused in RDF#19; the kiwi RDF file on page 125 of 2000 assessment (10) represent kiwi with 1000 observations , 3972 zeros, 2971 1⁄2 LOD values updated to 0.0015 (based on the communicated LOQ of 0.01 (25). Th e apple peel processi ng factor of 0.15X was applied to kiwi.

Lemons and Limes

Based on an adjusted maximum value of 29 PCT (Table 1), RDF#29 was created using a translation from the PDP orange data with 34 observations, 396 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 1053 true zeros. This file was applied to Lemon and Lime in DEEM. For lemon, peel RDF#29 was applied along with a concentration f actor of 15X based on th e literature rational used in the final acute assessment of 2000 (10).

Lemon Juice (and lime juice)

Lemon and lime juice were translated from the updated PDP data on orange juice using 29% crop treated from Table 1. Thus RDF#30 has 4 observations, 1056 true zeros and 427 values at 0.002 ppm (1/2 LOD). This valu es was applied in DEEM to Lemon, juice , and Lemon, juicebabyfood as well as Lime, juice , and Lime, juice-babyfood.

Lettuce

Current EPA-approved labels for chlorpyrifos pr oducts do not contain lettuce uses. However in 2008, EPA published a proposed tolera nce for lettuce (2) and thus le ttuce in included is this

assessment. PDP data for 2004 and 2005 cont ained 1486 total analyses with 42 observed residues (at a detection rate of 2.8%). Based on no label but gi ven the observations, a 2.8% PCT

estimate was used and no additional 1⁄2 LOD values were used for RDF#25. Therefore the PDP data was parsed between the 42 observations and 1444 true zeros. This file was applied toDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 36



### Lettuce, head and Lettuce, leaf in DEEM. This information was conservatively used to estimate potential exposure, but re presents a non-supported use at this point in time.

Milk

The 2004 and 2005 PDP data contained 1485 analyses of milk with no detectio ns of chlorpyrifos at the low detection limit of 0.17 ppb. In 2005, PDP analyzed 369 heavy cream samples with no detections for chlorpyrifos at 1.7 ppb. Th e 2007 PDP data contained 742 samples of heavy cream with no detections of chlorpyrifos at th e lower detection limit of 1.0 ppb. In addition, in 2007 PDP also analyzed for the ch lorpyrifos-oxon in cream sample s; there were no detections noted out of 742 samples of heavy cream. Th ese findings are congruent with previous

observations summarized in the EPA 2000 acute assessment where no residues had been found in historical PDP, FDA or the DAS NFS su rvey for over 3600 samples. Per the 2000 EPA procedures, the anticipated residue for milk wa s assumed to be zero for milk forms in DEEM: Milk, nonfat solids, Milk, nonfat solids-baby food/infant, Milk, water, Milk, waterbabyfood/infant formula, Milk, sugar (lactose)-baby food/infant

, Milk,fat and Milk, fat - baby food/infant formula.

Mint and Mint Oils

The approach for mint and oils was reused from the EPA 2000 acute assessment (10). Mint oils, spearmint and peppermint, are considered blende d commodities. For the oils, an average point estimate was calculated for each commodity using the tolerance for chlorpyrifos on mint and spearmint of 0.8 ppm and a processing factor of 10X, combined with the maximum estimated percent crop treated of 25% (Tab le 1) to yield a point estimate of 2.0 ppm. This point estimate was applied to Peppermint, oil and Spearmint, oil in DEEM. For the raw mint leaves the point estimate of 0.20 ppm was applicable to Peppermint and Spearmint in DEEM

.



### Onion

PDP 2003 data contains 216 observations for onions with no detections above the LOD of 0.01 ppm. Table 1 lists an adjusted maximum PCT of 57%. RDF#35 was constructed with 57 values of 0.005 ppm at 1⁄2 LOD and 43 true zeros. The file was applied to Onion forms in DEEM:Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 37



### Onion, dry bulb, Onion, dry bulb-babyfood. Dried onion is considered blended: Onion, dry bulb,

dried and Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood . For these forms, 1⁄2 the LOD = 0.005 ppm was used as a point estimate adjusted by the PCT of 57% to 0.00285 ppm (3) along with the DEEM default processing factor of 9X.

Orange

Revisions to the Lorsban ® 

### insecticide labels include several clarifications and a seasonal

maximum reductions for foliar and orchard floor s. The 2004 thru 2006 PDP data contained 1483 samples of oranges with 34 measurable re sidues (min= 0.0007, max = 0.017 ppm); there were ~2% detects. In the EPA 2000 acute version, BE AD provided an overall estimate of 19% PCT for oranges as a whole, but that 10% of proce ssed and 54% of fresh oranges eaten were treated with chlorpyrifos, no similar information was pr ovided in the 2008 SLUA. A review of the US PSD data for oranges (43) and shown in Appe ndix A indicates 77% of produced oranges are processed. Table 1 indicates an updated ma ximum PCT of 16% overall. Based on the 2000 EPA ratio examples, the previous 54 % PCT for fresh production and 10% PCT for processed were scaled by 16/19, to give re vised values of 45% PCT for fresh oranges and 9% PCT for processed oranges.

From the orange PDP data, an RDF#5 was cr eated for processed oranges with 34 observed residues, 99 values at 0.002 ppm (1⁄2 the LOD of 0.004 ppm) and 1350 zeros to represent the 91% untreated. This distribution was applied to oranges that are canned, plus also Orange, peel . Also for orange peels, a concentration factor of 15X was utilized base d on the literature rational used in the final acute assessment of 2000 (10).

For fresh oranges, an RDF#6 was created from the PDP data with 34 observed residues, 633 values at 0.002 ppm (1⁄2 the LOD of 0.004 ppm) and 816 zeros to represent the 55% untreated

.

Orange Juice

PDP data from 2004-2006 reports four residues in orange just above the LOD, out of 1,487 analyses. RDF#14 was constructed from the PD P data and based on the 9% PCT derived aboveDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 38



### for processed oranges and are treated with ch lorpyrifos and containe d four residues at 0.007 ppm, 1,353 true zeros and 130 values at 0.002 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD. This distribution was applied to

DEEM entries of: Orange, juice Orange, juice-babyfood

.

Peaches

Label changes for peach include a limitation of one treatment annually. PDP data from 2008 to 2006 contains 1261 samples with 218 observati on and 1043 no observable detections for a detection rate of 17.3%. A deeper review of t hose detections indicate s that over 90% of the residue exposure results from imported samples (Table 3), but that there is only a 9.1% import consumption rate in the US. Therefore the PD P data set was divided into two RDF files. RDF#57 was built for domestic peaches with 23 observations, 552 true zeros and 274 1⁄2 LOD values at average 0.004217 ppm, based on the 35% PCT of Table 1. RDF#63 was built for imported peaches with 194 observations, 41 true zeros and 171 1⁄2 LOD values at average 0.00186 ppm, based on a conservative assumption of 90% PCT. These files were parsed in

DEEM with a 0.91 and 0.09 ratio for the domestic/im port ratio for RDF files to the fresh fruit

food forms for Peach and also to Peach, dried (nonbaked food forms), Peach, dried-babyfood

, with the default processing factor of 1.8. These files were also used for Peach, juice and Peach, juice- babyfood with the 0.3X proces sing factor for juice.

Nectarines

The 2007 and 2008 PDP monitoring data for nectarin es is similar to th e peach with a 13% detection rate overall, but the domestic rate wa s <2% whereas the import detection rate was 35%. Thus similar to peaches, two RDF files were constructed. RDF# 61 was constructed with 9 detections, 564 true zeros and 233 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025 to represent domestic production at 30% PCT from EPA 2008 SLUA. For imports, RDF# 64 was constructed with 147 detections, 106 true zeros and 171 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.0025, with the conservative assumption of 75% PCT for imports. This data set was parsed to Nectarine by a 91/9 weighting for domestic/import consumption.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 39



### Peaches, canned

PDP data from 2003 and 2004 was available for th e canned forms. The PDP data contained 1485 analyses with no detections of chlorpyrifos in canned peach es (at the LOD of 0.01 ppm). RDF#58 was constructed to reflect this using th e 35% PCT to contain 35 values at 0.005 ppm and 65 true zeros. This file was applie d to the canned, baked fried food forms for Peach as well

as Peach-babyfood, and Peaches, dried but with the 1.8X drying factor.

Peanuts –FDA data

Label changes for peanuts included either a cap on the maximum seasonal rate for Lorsban ® 

### 4E

insecticide or a cap of 2 app lications per season for Lorsban ® 

### 15G insecticide. Table 1 indicates a current maximum of 6% PCT for peanuts. Howe ver, peanuts are considered blended (3) so for

the acute assessment this PCT was not used to further refine the LODs. The FDA data for peanuts in 2007 contains 14 observations and no detections. The requested 2004 to 2006 FDA data (25) for peanuts contains 28 null observation s. Because no additional data was available at this time, the older EPA 2000 peanut RDF f iles with six observations in the 1990s was conservatively re-used to repr esent peanuts. RDF#50 with the six residues of 0.021, 0.02, 0.02, 0.0005, 0.04 and 0.0005 ppm from page 135 of REF (10) was built along with 94 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.0025 ppm based on recent FDA communication of a 0.01 ppm value as typical for an LOQ (25). This file was also applied to Peanut, oilalong with the 2X concen tration factor for peanut oil (37).

Peanut Butter

PDP data in 2006 includes 739 analyses with no dete ctions observed and an LOD of 27 ppb. It is summarized that the drop in residues is likely a result of the label change s. Peanut butter is

blended so that no refinement for PCT is use d. Based on the 2006 PDP data, a point estimate of 0.00081 ppm was derived based on 1⁄2 the LOD = 13.5 ppb = 0.0135 ppm multiplied by the adjusted 6% PCT. This was applied to Peanut, butter within DEEM.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 40



### Pears and Pear Juice

Table 1 indicates a PCT of 25% for pears. In the 1400 plus samples of the 2003, 2004 and 2005 PDP data set for pears, there was a 2% detecti on rate of observable residues. RDF#49 was built with the 25% PCT, the 33 observed residues, 1112 true zeros and 338 values at 0.00169 ppm which was 1⁄2 the averaged LOD. Given the ratio of 207 import samples to 1265 domestic samples and an overall import consumption rate of 20% (Table 3), this distribution was not subdivided into domestic and imports . This file was applied to Pear and Pear-babyfood in DEEM. It was also applied to Pear, dried in DEEM along with the defa ult processing factor of 6.25 X foods in DEEM with 0.15X for peeling (per dried apples). This overall value of 0.94 ppm is congruent with other direct observations in dried fruit where no concentration has been observed in dried plums.

There were 64 PDP analyses of pear juice, concentrate and puree in 2002 and 2003; with no

observable residues noted. Because there were less than 100 observations for pear juice, the RDF#49 was also applied to Pear, juice and Pear, juice-babyfood with the 0.3 grape juice factor.

Peppers

The 2003 to 2004 PDP data contains 1299 analys is of sweet bell peppers and 232 reported detections of chlorpyrifos above the LOD of 0.0 012 ppm. The 18% detecti on rate is incongruent

with PCT 2008 SLUA estimate of 5% PCT. A review of the PDP data reveals the majority of

the observed detections were sourced from Mexi co, not domestically. As summarized in Table 3 the sampling rate for imports in PDP was 29% (366 import samples out of 1274) and US population consumes about 34% imported peppers. Therefore, within 5% the PDP data set is representative of imports and domestic exposure and a single RDF#32 was intended to be constructed with 232 residues, 1039 true ze ros and 28 values at 0.0006 ppm (1/2 LOD) conservatively based on an overall PCT rate of 20% based on the detection rate. (A small error was noted during the QA of this report; the actu al pepper file used contained 1299 true zeros instead of the planned 1039 true zeros. Because this report provides documentation of the input files passed onward in a new PBPK modeling effort (44), the error is just noted here.) Per the EPA 2000 assessment, the bell pepper data was translated to all pepper forms in DEEM: Pepper,Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 41



### bell, Pepper, bell-babyfood, Pepper, bell, drie d, Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood, Pepper, nonbell, Pepper, nonbell-babyfood, Pepper, nonbell, dried.

Plums and Prunes

PDP data on plums was available for 2005 and 2006. There were 1083 total analyses with 130

observable residues. The detection rate of 12% is incongruent with the domestic adjusted maximum PCT of 9% (Table 1). Table 3 indicate s that the majority of exposure comes from the imports within this file (~90%) but that US c onsumption of imports is <10% and that the PDP data has oversampled imported samples (424 sample s out of total of 1083). Based on this two distributions were used. For domestic plums, RDF#44 was built with 20 observed values and 600 true zeros, 39 LOD values at the 1⁄2 aver age LOD of 0.002809 ppm based on the 9% PCT. For imports, RDF#93 was built with 110 observati ons, 297 true zeros, 17 1⁄2 average LOD values at 0.003016 ppm based on a 30% PCT (rounded up from detection rate in imported samples). The RDF#44 and RDF#93 distributions were pa rsed in DEEM with 0.92 and 0.08 weightings, respectively and applied to Plum; Plum-babyfood; Plum, prune , fresh; Plum, prune, freshbabyfood in DEEM. RDF#44 was also used with the juice processing factor of 1.4 for Plum, prune, juice; Plum, prune, juice-babyfood

.



### Similarly 2005 and 2006 PDP data was available for “Plums, Dried (Prunes)”. Of the 377 analyses of the dried plums, no detections we re noted. RDF#45 was built using the 9% PCT with 34 values at 1⁄2 the average LOD = 0.00271 ppm and 343 true zeros, and applied to Plum, prune, dried; Plum, prune, dried-babyfood . Because the dried commodity was observed directly, the default processi ng factor of 5X was removed.

Pork Fat

In 2005, PDP analyzed 352 pork adipose samples for chlorpyrifos and found 1 residue (at 2.5 ppb) above the LOD of 1.5 ppb. This finding was ex tremely congruent with historical DAS data from the NFS study which found 1 residue (at 3.5 ppb) out of 200 samples. Based on the 20% rationale of livestock feeding percentages in the EPA 2000 acute assessment, the updated PDP

data was used to create RDF#38 was created w ith 1 residue, 39 values at 1⁄2 LOD = 0.00075 ppmDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 42



### and 160 true zeros. This file was applied to Pork, fat, Pork, skin, and Pork, fat-babyfood in

DEEM

.



### Pork Meat

In 2005, PDP analyzed 352 pork muscle samples for chlorpyrifos and reported no observable residues with an LOD of 0.75 ppb. This null fi nding is understandable given the separate analyses of meat and fat coupled with the very low findings in pork fat (1 of 353). Based on these findings and the 20% rationale of livesto ck feeding percentages in the EPA 2000 acute assessment, RDF#39 was created with 20 values at 0.000375 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 80 true zeros. RDF#39 was applied in DEEM to Pork, meat, Pork, meat-babyfood, Pork, meat byproducts, Pork, meat byproducts-babyfood, Pork, kidney, and Pork, liver

.

Poultry Meat

2006 PDP data is available. 654 samples each of poultry breast and thighs were sampled; no observable residues were reported with an LOD of 1.5 ppb. The PCT of 10% from the 2000 assessment was retained. A RDF# 46 was built with 10 values at 0.00075 ppm = 1⁄2 LOD and 90 true zeros. This file was applie d to the following foods in DEEM: Poultry, other, meat; Poultry, other, liver; Poultry, other, meat byproduct; Chicken, meat; Chicken, meat-babyfood; Chicken, liver; Chicken, meat-byproducts; Chicken, meat-b yproducts baby food; Turkey, meat; Turkey, meat-babyfood; Turkey, liver; Turkey,liver- babyfood;Turkey,meat-byproduct; Turkey,meatbyproducts-babyfood.

Poultry Fat

There are no new direct measurements of poultr y fat; therefore RDF file generated in the EPA 2000 assessment (Table 15) has been reused (10) . RDF#47 was generated using the anticipated residue for poultry fat derived from animal burdens and feeding study information and an

assumed PCT value of 10% for treated animals feed s. Therefore it contains 90 true zeros and 10 values at 0.000672 ppm. This file was applied to following in DEEM: Chicken, fat; Chicken, fat-babyfood; Chicken, skin; Chicken, skin-baby food; Poultry, other, fat; Poultry, other, skin, Turkey, fat; Turkey, fat-babyfood; Turkey, skin; Turkey, skin-babyfood. This assessment isDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 43



### actually conservative based on other measurements for animal fat which indicated there are <1% detections and very low residues.

Poultry Eggs

There are no new direct monitori ng measurements of chlorpyrifos residues in eggs ; therefore the RDF file generated in the EPA 2000 assessment (Table 15) has been re-used (10). RDF#48 was generated using the anticip ated residue for poultry eggs derive d from animal burdens and feeding study information and an assumed PCT value of 10% for treated animals feeds. Therefore it

contains 90 true zeros and 10 va lues at 0.000105 ppm. This file was applied to following in

DEEM: Egg, whole; Egg, whole-babyfood; Egg, white ; Egg, white (solids)-babyfood; Egg, yolk; Egg, yolk-babyfood.

Radish

Current PDP sweet potato data wa s translated to radishes base d on estimate of 19 PCT for all root and tubers per the 2 000 BEAD QUA (10). RDF#92 contai ned 165 observations, 1328 true zeros and 146 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.001071 ppm and was applied to Radish, roots and Radish, Oriental, roots in DEEM.

Sorghum

Table 1 indicates an adjusted maximum PCT of 1% is appropriate. No direct data was used for sorghum, instead field trial data from corn was translated to sorghum using a 1% PCT; thus a point estimate of 0.00011 ppm was applied in DEEM to Sorghum, grain. To convert sorghum grain data to syrup, a processing factor of 0.05 was used (45) in DEEM for Sorghum, syrup.

Soybeans

Recent changes to the soybean use pattern include an added cap of 3 applications per season and clarification of a 10 day retreatment interval. Chlorpyrifos usage on soybeans has an adjusted maximum of 7% PCT (Table 1). Because soybean is a blended commodity with a low PCT, typically a point estimate is derived. For soybe ans, the average residue (0.032 ppm) from the representative field trial conducte d with a maximum seasonal applica tion rate of 3 lb ai/A and aDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 44



### 28 day PHI (46) was scaled by 7% PCT and the final value of 0.00224 ppm derived was used in

DEEM for Soybean, seed, Soybean, flour, Soybean, flour-babyfood, Soybean, soy milk, and Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or infant. This same average was also used for soybean oil and its baby food counterpart along with the additional processing factor of 0.14 used previously by EPA (10).

It is also noted PDP data for 2003, 2004 and 2005 is available for soybeans and it seems to imply a much higher percent crop treated with a dete ction rate in raw grai n of 17.7%. This is understood, however, as a reflection of the blended nature of soybean grain and the low detection rate of 3 ppb.

Strawberry

PDP data from 2004 and 2005 plus 2008 contained a to tal of 2209 analyses of strawberries with 66 detects observed at an average LOD of 0.001 280 ppm. Using an adjusted maximum of 33% PCT from Table 1, RDF#36 was constructed with the 66 detects, 1480 true zeros and 663 values at 0.00128 ppm (1⁄2 the averaged LOD value). RDF#36 was applied to DEEM foods of Strawberry and Strawberry-babyfood. For the juice forms in DEEM ( Strawberry, juice and Strawberry, juice-babyfood ), RDF#36 was used along with the grape juice processing factor of

0.3X.

Sunflower

Per Table 1, the PCT for sunflowers has increased over the last few years; an adjusted value of

9% was used for the maximum. Therefore a RD F#62 was created with 9 measured residues of 0.046 ppm and 91 zeros. This was applied to Sunflower, seed in DEEM. Similar to the EPA 2000 acute assessment, sunflower oil was treated as a blended commodity but with an increased 9 PCT. Therefore an average residu e of 0.00046 ppm *9 = 0.00414 ppm was applied to Sunflower, oil and Sunflower, oil-babyfood in DEEM.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 45



### Sweet Potato

PDP data from 2003, 2004 and 2008 was available for sweet potatoes. The data set contained a

10% observed residues rate with a maximum con centration of 0.084 ppm. The full data set was 1,639 samples which had reported LODs of eith er 0.0013 or 0.004 ppm. Ta ble 1 indicates an

estimated PCT of 65% based on 2002 data w ithin the EPA 2008 SLUA. RDF#52 contains 574 true zeros, 165 observed residues and 900 values set at 0.001071 ppm which is 1⁄2 the averaged LOD. This file was applied to Sweet potato and Sweet potato-babyfood within DEEM: For canned forms of sweet potato in DEEM, the processing factor of 0.15X (apple peeling) was also applied.

Tree Nuts

Chlorpyrifos has separate tolerances at 0.2 ppm established for four types of tree nuts: almond, hazelnut, pecan, walnut (2). PDP data for al monds from 2007 and 2008 is available and shows a 42% detection rate (based on the low ppb LOD) in 547 overall samples. This data indicates that the adjusted maximum PCT values of Table 1 we re too low for almonds at 27%. For almonds, the RDF#10 was built with the implied 43% de tection rate with 232 observations, 3 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.0005 ppm and 312 true zeros. This file was applied to Almond and Almond, oil as well as their baby food counterparts in DEEM. (It is assumed that filberts and hazelnut information is interchangeable for this dietar y assessment.) For filb erts, the 2008 EPA SLUA

PCT value of 20% was used with the 232 almond observations and additional zeros were added to bring the detection rate down to 20% with 928 zeros in RDF#11 and applied to Filbert and Filbert, oil, oil as in DEEM. Similarly for Pecans at 35% PCT, the 232 observations were combined with 431 true zeros in RDF#12 and applied to Pecan as in DEEM. For Walnuts at 55% PCT, the 232 observations were combined with 246 zeros and 69 1⁄2 LOD values at 0.0005 ppm in RDF#13 and applied to Walnut as in DEEM.

Turnip and Rutabagas

Similar to the 2000 assessment, a translation from current PDP data for sweet potatoes is made to turnips and rutabagas. A RDF#51 contained 165 observations, 1328 true zeros and 900 1⁄2 LODDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 46



### values at 0.001071 ppm and was applied to Rutabaga and Turnip, roots in DEEM. For canned forms of rutabagas in DEEM the processing fact or of 0.15X (apple peeling) was also applied.

Drinking Water – PDP and NAQWA Data

For this assessment, the PDP data sets for wate r were used. The PDP data contained various water analyses over all years from 2003 to 2007. Re sults were reported as four types of water: bottled water, finished water, drinking water a nd unfinished water in 3688 analyzed samples. In

all cases no observable residues we re reported. The LODs ranged from 30 ppt to 6 ppt, so an average weighted LOD of 16.5 ppt was calculate d from all observations. In addition, in 2007 PDP also analyzed for the chlorpyrifos oxon in water samples; there were no detections noted out of 238 samples of finished and untreate d drinking water. A 1⁄2 average LOD of 0.000008 ppm for all water sources was used.

Wheat

Recent changes to the wheat use pattern include a maximum application rate of 0.5 lb ai/acre and clarification of a 10 day retreatment interval . The current PDP data contains separate

distributions for wheat grain and wheat flour.

For Wheat, grain and Wheat, grain-babyfood , RDF#15 was created using 2004, 2005 and 2006

PDP data. The files contained 8 observed re sidues and 935 values at 0.003 ppm (1/2 LOD); because wheat is a blended commodity (3) no true zeros were used. This may be an overestimation of exposure given the sma ll PCT of wheat. RDF#15 was used for Wheat, germ along with the processing factor of 2.7X from the EPA’s 2000 assessment. For Wheat, bran, the RDF#15 was used with a Processing Factor of 3X.

For flour, PDP data from 2003 and 2004 contained a total of 1311 no detects at an LOD of 0.006 ppm. (The current PDP LOD of 0.006 ppm is slightly higher th an the historical weighted average LOD = 0.00482 ppm available (10) for the 2000 assessment.) Because flour is a blended commodity, in order to use the current flour PDP data, no adjustment for PCT would be available and the 1⁄2 the LOD value = 0.003 ppm is applicable as the average residue within DEEM (3).Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 47



### However, this is likely an overestimation given that the estimate of PCT 5% for wheat (Table 1).

Moreover the detection rate in the updated PDP data is signif icantly lower (<1% versus 13%) than in the previous decade, yet the LOD used is higher and therefor e the average residue calculated from the updated monitoring data w ould be artificially affected by the LOD. Therefore per the procedures used in 2000, the wh eat grain RDF#15 is used with the processing factor for flour of 0.145 (47) for both Wheat, flour and Wheat, flour-babyfood . In addition, the boiled food forms used the previous factor of 0.026X employed by EPA in past assessments (47).

ACUTE DIETARY ASSESSMENT

Appendix C documents the DEEM version 2.16 input file used which draws on the individual commodity information for the ~ 70 RDF files in Appendix B. A summary of the RDF files information as produced by DEEM is found in Ap pendix D. The analysis is based on existing chlorpyrifos registrations with th e tolerances esta blished in the Federal Re gister in the 2008 Final Rule (2). The key output assessment (Summary calculations--per capita from the DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis with 1994-98) by sub population is found in A ppendix E. Because the PCT had already been incorporated in to the RDF files or the point estimates, adjustment factor #2 was

not used. The Monte Carlo option was used with 5000 iterations and a seed of 24. The risk

estimates are calculated based on curr ent aPAD which varies by subpopulation.

The estimated acute dietary exposure does not ex ceed HED's level of concern [i.e., >100 % of the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD)] for the general US population and relevant population subgroups at the 99.9 th 

### percentile of exposure. The estimated dietary exposure for the general U.S. population at the 99.9 th 

### percentile exposure wa s 0.000169 mg/kg/day, or 3.4% aPAD. For children 1 – 2 years old, the mo st highly exposed popul ation subgroup, dietary exposure was 0.000273 mg/kg/day, or 54.6% aPAD. At the 99.9 th 

### percentile, acute risks are not of concern for the most highly exposed populat ion sub-group, children 1-2 years old. A summary of the key information per capita for the 99.9 th 

### percentile is summarized in the following table.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 48



### Summary Table: Calculati ons (per Capita) from DEEM Acute Assessment

Population Exposure (mg/kg/day) % aPAD MOE (relative to

NOEL) U.S. Population 0.000169 3.39 2952 All infants 0.000211 42.14 2373 Nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000143 28.69 3486 Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old) 0.000212 42.44 2356 Children 1-6 yrs 0.000253 50.63 1975 Children 7-12 yrs 0.000157 31.41 3183 Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.000185 36.96 2705 Females 13+ (nursing) 0.000161 32.10 3115 Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing) 0.000100 19.93 5016 Females 20+ (not preg or nursing) 0.000150 29.91 3343 Females 13-50 yrs 0.000135 26.94 3711 Males 13-19 yrs 0.000130 2.61 3834 Males 20+ yrs 0.000154 3.08 3247 Seniors 55+ 0.000166 3.31 3017 Children 1-2 yrs 0.000273 54.62 1830 Children 3-5 yrs 0.000225 44.95 2224 Children 6-12 yrs 0.000159 31.71 3153 Youth 13-19 yrs 0.000115 23.04 4339 Adults 20-49 yrs 0.000146 2.92 3426 Adults 50+ yrs 0.000166 3.31 3018 Females 13-49 yrs 0.000134 26.84 3726

Commodity Contributions

An analysis was conducted to determine the foods or food forms which contri bute the most to the exposure estimates for the highest potentially ex posed subpopulation of children 1-2 years old. Grape juice and grapes, collards and kiwi modeled as significant sources of dietary exposure in a limited (942 iteration) Critical E xposure Contribution (CEC) analysis of this assessment file (See Appendix F). The grape exposure is being driven by imported grapes truncated to the tolerance value. The grape juice exposur e is a reflection of the high consumption of grape juice by children and the practice of using a 1⁄2 LOD value for blended commodities; there were no observable residues in the PDP grape juice data set. The apparent importance of collards is likely an artifact of a single hi gh outlier value included in the RFD file. As discussed in the text,Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 49



### it is likely a mistransposition of ppb to ppm given the reported minimum was 0.0063 ppm and the questionable value is 6.3 ppm. The FDA ki wi dataset was reused from the 2002 assessment with a peeling factor, becau se there was no new data.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 50



### REFERENCES

1. US EPA, Interim Reregistration Eligibil ity Decision for Chlorpyrifos, EPA 738-R-01-

007

, 

### February 2002, http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf , accessed on October 24, 2007.

2. US Federal Register, Vol 73 FR 53739, Sept. 17, 2008, per e CFR, http://ecfr.gpoaccess.go v/cgi/t/text/textidx?c=ecfr&sid=2c9442510d3cd02d9f79a6e0768 ea110&rgn=div8&view=text&node=40

:23.0.1.1.28.3.19.126&idno=40 , accessed April 19, 2010.

3. US EPA, Classification of Food Forms W ith Respect to Level of Blending, HED SOP 99.6, August 20, 1999.

4. US EPA, Translation of Monito ring Data, HED SOP 99.3, March 26, 1999.

5. US EPA, Assigning Values to Non-Detect able/Non-Quantifiable Pesticide Residues in Human Health Food Exposure Assessments, March 23, 2000.

6. US EPA, Pesiticde Science Policy; Notice of Withdrawal, EPAHQOPP20080935; FRL88047, Sept 29, 2010.

7. US EPA, Memorandum Carbofuran. Revise d Acute Probabilistic Dietary Exposure Assessment to Support Risk Mitigation for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (Phase VI): DP D330841, DN: 347526, July 20, 2006.

8. US EPA, Aldicarb. List A Reregistrati on Case No. 0140/Chemical ID No. 098301, Acute Revised Dietary Exposure An alyses for the HED Human Health Risk, DP D299882, November 1, 2006.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 51



### 9. US EPA, Methomyl. Acute, Probabilistic Aggregate Dietary (F ood and Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision, DP D340694, June 19, 2007, accessed as EPA-HQ-OPP- 2007-0975-0003 at www.Regulations.gov on November 1, 2007.

10. US EPA, Memorandum Chlorpyrifos. Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos,

Revised after Public Comments: Chemi cal No. 59101: DP Barcode D263890, June 22,

2000.

11. L. E. Gomez, Use and Benefits of Chlo rpyrifos in US Agriculture, May 18, 2009, Registration Review Do cket EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-085.

12. DEEM-FCID version 2.16, Exponent, 2007.

13. J. Johnston, Exponent, personal communica tion on November 1, 2007, to use Appendix D of DEEM Manual, Novigen, 2000.

14. EPA, Chlorpyrifos 059101, Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA), February 7, 2008, EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0850-0005.

15. K. D. Racke, N. N. Poletika, D. R. Juberg, C. A. Loy, C. B. Cleveland, L. E. Gomez, C. J. Burns, M. J. Bartels, F. B. Selma n, D. Yon, and M. Douglas, Dow AgroSciences' Response to EPA's Chlorpyrifos, May 18, 2009, Registration Review Docket EPA-HQOPP-2008-0850.

16. B. Hendrix, Dow AgroSciences, Changes in the Agricultural Uses of Lorsban® insecticides, Internal Pr esentation, February 2005.

17. DEEM Manual, Novigen, 2000.

18. Marty, MS; Andrus, AK, Comparison of Cho linesterase (ChE) Inhibition in Young Adult and Preweanling CD Rats after Acute and Repeated Chlorpyrifos Exposures, Study ID: 091107, Unpublished Report of Dow AgroSciences, MRID 48139301, June 29, 2010.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 52



### 19. R. Reiss, B. Neal and J. Lamb, Benchmar k Dose Modeling for Cho linesterase Inhibition from Exposure to Chlorpyrifos and Ch lorpyrifos-Oxon, Unpublished Report of Dow AgroSciences, Report IN 0900956.000 B0T) 06010, MRID 48139302, June 30, 2010.

20. USDA PDP, Pesticide Data Program, http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetc hTemplateData.do?te mplate=TemplateG&to pNav=&leftNav=ScienceandLaboratories&page=PDPDownloadData/Reports&descriptio n=Download+PDP+Data/Reports&acct=pestcddataprg , reaccessed April 22, 2010.

21. Blomquist, J. D., Denis, J. M., Cowles, J. P ., Hetrick, J. A., Jones, R. D., Birchfield, N. B., 2001. Pesticides in Selected Water-Supply Reservoirs and Finished Drinking Water, 1999-2000: Summary of Results from a Pilo t Monitoring Program. Open-File Report 01-456, United States Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD.

22. Tierney, D. P., Christensen, B. R., Culp epper, V. C., 2001. Drinking Water Monitoring Study for Six Organophosphorus Insecticides and Four Oxons from 44 Community Water Systems on Surface Water in the Un ited States, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Study No. 1300-00 (MRID 45513501).

23. DeSimone, L.A. (2009). Quality of Water from Domestic Wells in Principal Aquifers of the United States, 1991–2004: U.S. Geological Su rvey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5227, available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5227.

24. FDA Pesticide Program Residue Monitoring, http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContam inantsAdulteration/ Pesticides/Residue MonitoringReports/default.htm , accessed April 22, 2010 and October 18, 2010.

25. FDA, Ronald Roy, letter to Cheryl B. Cleveland, dated May 13, 2010.

26. FDA residue monitoring data set for 2007, http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContam inantsAdulteration/ Pesticides/Residue MonitoringReports/ucm172746.htm visited on April 29, 2010.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 53



### 27. Wirtz, Mark S, FDA, personal communications by email on November 15, 2007 and January 11, 2008.

28. PAM I Manual, Chapter 1, Section 105, www.fda.gov/downloads/.../Pestic ideAnalysisManualPAM/ucm111496.pdf accessed on April 29, 2010.

29. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Production Supply and Distribution, Online, Custom Query ( http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx ), accessed April 21,

2010.

30. USDA, Economics, Statistics, a nd Market Information System, ( http://usda.mannlib.corne ll.edu/MannUsda/homepage.do ), accessed for “US Tomato Statistics (92010)” on April 21, 2010.

31. USDA, Economics, Statistics, a nd Market Information System, ( http://usda.mannlib.corne ll.edu/MannUsda/homepage.do ), accessed for “US Bell & Chile Pepper Statisics” on April 23, 2010.

32. Mary Peet, NCSU, Cucumber, Sustainable Practices for Vegetable Production in the South, http://ncsu.edu/sustainable/profiles/c10cuke.html , accessed April 21, 2010.

33. K. Dorschner, Chlorpyrifos: Magnitude of Residue on Apple, IR-4 Study ID 0890, Report 08015.01-CAR02, MRID 46159101 , December 08, 2003.

34. C. Merino, Dow AgroSciences, persona l communication, R&D Chile, August 2009.

35. Dow AgroSciences, revised specimen label for Lorsban* 4E Insecticide, September 12

2002.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 54



### 36. J. Hughes, Residues of Chlorpyrifos in Appl es at Intervals and Ha rvest and in Process Fractions Following Multiple Applicati ons of EF-1551 - Northern Europe – 2004, Internal Report of Dow AgroSciences , Report number GHE-P-10867, September 17,

2005.

37. S. Knizner, Chlorpyrifos Anticipated Re sidues for DRES Acute Analysis, DP Barcode: D216468, 10/95.

38. United States Department of Agricult ure, USDA, Pesticide Data Program, PDPDownload Data/Reports Webpage, 1999 and 1998 Summary reports.

39. A. Tejada et al

, The Philippine Agriculturist , 73: 375-385, 1990.

40. S. Lee, J. Agric. Food Chem. 39 : 906-908, 1991.

41. C. B. Cleveland, Updated Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos: Includes Proposed Barley and Grass Uses, MRID 4735030 1, Internal Report of Dow AgroSciences, Study Report: 081012, February 2008.

42. US EPA BEAD, Quantitative Usage Analysis , Chlorpyrifos, revised February 14, 2000 as posted in Ref (10).

43. USDA FAS, Production Suppl y and Distribution Online, http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx accessed July 30, 2008 and April 28,

2010.

44. P. S. Price, K. D. Schnelle, C. B. Cleveland, M. J. Bartels, P. M. Hinderliter, C. Timchalk, and T.S. Poet, Application of a Source-to-Outcome Model for the Assessment of Dietary Exposures to Insecticide Residues, submitted to Reg Tox Pharm. in August

2010.

45. S. Knizner, Chlorpyrifos Anticipated Re sidues for DRES Acute Analysis, DP Barcode: D216468, 10/95.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 55



### 46. Miller, P. W., Results of Tests on th e Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytic al Method: Chlorpyrifos. Includes Method ACR 73.5 dated 12/6/73, ACR 71.19R dated 9/27/73, GH-C 1224, CDL099023-P, MRID #00095270.

47. M. Flood, PP#3F2947, 8/10/92, within US EP A, Memorandum Chlorpyrifos. Chronic Exposure Assessment for Chlorpyrifos RED with Updated Values for Anticipated Residues, Revised After Public Comments : Chemical No. 59101: DP Barcode D263889, June 22, 2000.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 56



### Table 1. Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA

Major Crops DAS Annual Usage {lb ai} EPA’s SLUA Estimate

(Lb ai) % Diff. EPA Estimate

vs. Actual EPA SLUA Aver PCT Data Adjusted average PCT EPA SLUA Max PCT Data Adjusted Max PCT

Alfalfa 374,750 400,000 6.70% 5 5 5 5

Almonds 341,991 500,000 46.20% 30 21 40 27

Apples 414,600 400,000 -3.50% 55 57 65 67 Asparagus 22,104 20,000 -9.50% 25 28 40 44

Beans (Green) 1 4119 3,000 27.20% 1 1 5 7

Broccoli 60,385 90,000 49.00% 45 30 55 37 Brussels Sprouts 6,000 n/a N/C n/a N/C n/a Cabbage 8,797 10,000 13.70% 10 9 25 22

Cauliflower 15,239 20,000 31.20% 40 30 60 46

Cherries 80,140 60,000 -25.10% 30 40 40 53

Corn 2,617,432 3,000,000 14.60% 5 4 5 4

Cotton 285,350 200,000 -29.90% 1 1 5 7

Cranberries 50,000 n/a 70 n/a n/a

Cucumbers 1 3,832 3,000 -21.70% 1 1 5 6 Dry Beans/Peas 1 3,033 4,000 31.90% 1 1 2.5 2 Figs 5,000 n/a N/C n/a N/C n/a Grapefruit 54,855 60,000 9.40% 15 14 25 23 Grapes (Table) 60,428 100,000 65.50% 5 3 10 6

Grapes (Wine) 68,603 n/a - 100.00% 5 N/C 10 N/C

Hazelnuts 7,286 7,000 -3.90% 15 16 20 21

Lemons 47,033 90,000 91.40% 35 18 55 29

Mint 50,000 n/a 25 n/a 25 n/a Nectarines 20,000 n/a 20 n/a 30

Onions 68,805 60,000 -12.80% 35 40 50 57 Oranges 241,735 300,000 24.10% 10 8 20 16

Peaches 69,853 70,000 0.20% 30 30 35 35

Peanuts 119,213 200,000 67.80% 5 3 10 6

Pears 29,564 30,000 1.50% 20 20 25 25 Peas 1 (Fresh/Green/Sweet) 1,012 500 1 2 2.5 5

Pecans 296,596 300,000 1.20% 35 35 35 35

Peppers 1 1,509 2,000 32.50% 1 1 5 4

Plums/Prunes 18,674 40,000 114.20% 15 7 20 9

Pumpkins 2,791 2,000 -28.30% 1 1 5 7 Sorghum 14,190 30,000 111.40% 1 0.5 2.5 1 Soybeans3 1,017,953 700,000 -31.20% 1 1 5 7

Strawberries 10,043 9,000 -10.40% 15 17 30 33Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 57



### Table 1. (cont.) Percent Market Share Data: Refinement to the EPA 2008 SLUA

Major Crops DAS Annual Usage {lb ai} EPA’s SLUA Estimate

(Lb ai) % Diff. EPA Estimate

vs. Actual EPA SLUA Aver PCT Data Adjusted average PCT EPA SLUA Max PCT Data Adjusted Max PCT Sugar Beets 138,020 100,000 -27.60% 10 14 15 21

Sunflowers 34,857 20,000 -42.60% 1 2 5 9

Sweet Corn 120,881 100,000 -17.30% 10 12 15 18

Sweet Potatoes 100,000 n/a 65 n/a NC n/a Tangelos 2,000 n/a 10 NC 10 NC Tangerines 6,000 n/a 10 NC 10 NC

Tobacco 98,468 100,000 1.60% 15 15 15 15

Walnuts 195,505 400,000 104.60% 45 22 55 27

Wheat 288,751 300,000 3.90% 1 1 5 5Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 58Table 2. Applicable USDA PDP MonitoringData from 2003 to 2008 with TolerancesCommodityaYearUnitNDetectsNonDetectsPercentDetectsMax(ppm)Min(ppm)LODaverage1/2 LOD2010Tolerance(ppm)Almonds 07-08 B/1000 547 232 315 42% 0.0478 0.001 0.001 0.0005 0.2Apple Juice 07-08 M 740 0 740 0% - - 0.006265 0.00313 0.01Apple Sauce 06 M 714 0 714 0.0% - - 0.0020471 0.00102 0.01Apples 04-05 M 1487 17 1470 1.1% 0.016 0.002 0.001505 0.00075 0.01Asparagus 03-08 M 723 21 702 3% 0.48 0.003 0.0095030 0.004752 5Asparagus, Canned 03 M 354 6 348 2% 0.025 0.0063 0.003857062 0.00193Bananas 06-08 M 1486 3 1483 0.2% 0.0063 0.0063 0.003713 0.00186 0.1Broccoli 06-08 M 1475 108 1367 7.3% 0.038 0.002 0.0012 0.00060 1Butter 03 B/1000 732 1 731 0% 0.0027 0.0027 0.0016 0.00080 0.25Cauliflower 06-04 M 1484 8 1476 0.5% 0.01 0.002 0.001798 0.00090 1Cherries 07 M 419 0 419 0% - - 0.002730788 0.00137 1Corn Grain 06-08 M 1300 311 989 24% 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.00050 0.05Cranberries 06 M 316 71 245 22% 0.093 0.0049 0.004660759 0.00233 1Cucumbers 03-04 M 1296 25 1271 2% 0.038 0.007 0.004 0.00200 0.05Grapefruit 05-06 M 1485 24 1461 1.6% 0.0069 0.013 0.001727 0.00086 1Grape Juice 08 M 745 0 745 0% - - 0.00420953 0.00210Grapes 04-05 M 1477 180 1297 12.2% 0.32 0.0063 0.003858 0.00193 0.01Green Beans 07-08 M 1480 14 1466 0.9% 0.051 0.003 0.003428 0.00171 0.05Green Beans,Canned 04-03 M 928 0 928 0.0% - - 0.004710 0.00236 0.05Green Beans,Frozen 05 M 555 1 554 0.18% 0.007 0.007 0.004569369 0.00228 0.05Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 59Table 2. (cont.) Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with TolerancesCommodityaYear Unit N DetectsNonDetectsPercentDetectsMax(ppm)Min(ppm)LODaverage1/2 LOD2010Tolerance(ppm)Greens, Kale 08-06 M 802 36 766 4.5% 1.1 0.0063 0.003854 0.00193 1Green Onions 08 M 186 2 184 1.1% 0.14 0.002 0.0012 0.000600.5Greens, Collardb08-06 M 679 22 657 3.2% 6.3 0.0063 0.004148 0.00207 1Heavy Cream 07+05 B/1000 1111 0 1111 0% - - 0.001232 0.00062 0.25Honey 07-08 B/1000 744 1 743 0.1% 0.0013 0.0013 0.001 0.00050Kidney Beans,Canned 08 M 164 0 164 0% 0.000 0.000 0.017426829 0.00871Lettuce 04-05 M 1486 42 1444 2.8% 0.06 0.002 0.0020140 0.00101 1Milk 04-05 B/1000 1485 0 1485 0.0% - - 0.00017 0.00009 0.01Nectarines 07-08 M 1235 156 1079 12.6% 0.07 0.008 0.005 0.00250 0.05Onion 03 M 216 0 216 0% - - 0.01 0.00500 0.5Orange Juice 04-06 M 1487 4 1483 0.3% 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.00200 1Oranges 04-06 M 1483 34 1449 2.3% 0.017 0.007 0.004 0.00200 1Peaches 08-06 M 1261 218 1043 17.3% 0.19 0.003 0.006895 0.00345 0.05Peaches, Canned 04-03 M 1485 0 1485 0.0% - - 0.01 0.00500 0.05Peanut Butter 06 B/1000 739 0 739 0% - - 0.027 0.01350 0.2Pear Juice,Conc./Puree 03-02 M 66 0 66 0.0% - - 0.004 0.00200 0.05Pears 03-05 M 1483 33 1450 2.2% 0.041 0.0063 0.003372 0.00169 0.05Plums 06-05 M 1088 130 958 11.9% 0.18 0.005 0.005780 0.00289 0.1Plums, Dried(Prunes) 06-05 M 377 0 377 0.0% - - 0.005427 0.00271 0.1Pork Adipose 05 B/1000 352 1 351 0% 0.0025 0.0025 0.0015 0.00075 0.2Pork Muscle 05 B/1000 352 0 352 0% - - 0.00075 0.00038 0.05Poultry, Breast 06-07 B/1000 655 0 655 0.0% - - 0.0015 0.00075 0.1Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 60Table 2. (cont.) Applicable USDA PDP Monitoring Data from 2003 to 2008 with TolerancesCommodityaYear Unit N DetectsNonDetectsPercentDetectsMax(ppm)Min(ppm)LODaverage1/2 LOD2010Tolerance(ppm)Poultry, Thigh 06-07 B/1000 655 0 655 0.0% - - 0.0015 0.00075 0.1Raisins 06-07 B/1000 744 5 739 0.7% 0.022 0.007 0.00516129 0.00258 0.01Rice 08 M 182 0 182 0% - - 0.01 0.00500Soybean grain 03-05 B/1000 1263 272 991 21.5% 0.025 0.005 0.003 0.00150 0.3Strawberries04-05+08 M 2209 66 2143 3.0% 0.04 0.0013 0.002559 0.00128 0.2Sweet Bell Peppers 03-04 M 1299 232 1067 17.9% 0.47 0.002 0.0012 0.00060 1Sweet Corn, Fresh 08 M 152 0 152 0% - - 0.014434211 0.00722 0.05Sweet Corn,Frozen 03+08 M 580 0 580 0.0% - - 0.004693 0.00235 0.05Sweet Peas, Frozen 03+06 M 1293 0 1293 0.0% - - 0.004027 0.00201 0.05Sweet Potatoes04-03+08M 1639 165 1474 10.1% 0.084 0.0022 0.002142 0.00107 0.05Water, Bottled 05-06 T/1000000 745 0 745 0.0% - - 0.00003 0.00002Water, Finished 03-08 T/1000000 1852 0 1852 0% - - 0.0000115 5.75E-06Water,Groundwater07-08 T/1000000 522 0 522 0.0% - - 0.00003 0.00002Water, Untreated 04-08 T/1000000 1059 0 1059 0% - - 0.0000101 0.00001Wheat Flour 04-03 B/1000 1311 0 1311 0.0% - - 0.006 0.00300 0.5Wheat grain 04-06 B/1000 1361 8 1353 0.6% 0.042 0.01 0.006 0.00300 0.5Winter Squash 04-06 M 1464 27 1437 1.8% 0.029 0.0065 0.003929 0.001960.05(pumpkin)aPDP commodities without tolerances are not listed.bmaximum value likely a mistransposition of ppb to ppm.Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 61Table 3. Relevant Commodities with Significant ImportContributions to Overall Detections in PDP DataCommodityOverallDetects(%)DomesticDetects(%)ImportDetects(%)DomesticTotalresidue(%)ImportedTotalresidue(%)Number ofImportObservationsNumber ofDomesticObservationUSPopulationConsumptionof Imports(%)Asparagus31.93 3.31 6.00 94.00 513 207 57Cucumbers20.61 3.30 14.04 85.96 606 661 38Grapes12.21.97 23.17 3.37 96.63 712 761 54.4Nectarines12.61.12 34.67 3.76 96.24 424 806 9.1Peaches17.32.71 47.78 6.03 93.97 406 849 9.1Pears2.20.24 14.49 6.70 93.30 207 1265 20.8Plums11.93.03 25.94 5.91 94.09 424 659 7.4Sweet Bell Peppers17.92.75 55.46 7.21 92.79 366 908 34.1Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 62



### Table 4. Label Use Restrictions Applicable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from Lorsban ®



### Advanced Insecticide Label

Section Specific Use Restrictions From Lorsban Advanced Label Tree Fruits and Tree Nuts. Dormant/Delayed Dormant Make only one application of Chlorpyrifos during the dormant season. Do not use more than 4 pints of Lorsban Advanced (1.88 lb ai Chlorpyrifos) per acre per season as a dormant/delayed dormant application. Do not make a soil or foliar application of Lorsban Advanced of products containing chlorpyrifos within 10 days of a dormant/delayed dormant application of chlorpyrifos to the orchard.

Cherry, nectarine, Peach, and Almond Trunk Spray or preplant dip. Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, peaches and nectarines or within 21 days before harvest of cherries. Do not make more than one chlorpyrifos application per year in peaches and nectaries and no more than three chlorpyrifos applications per year in cherries.

Tree Nuts. Foliar Sprays. Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, filberts and walnuts, or 28 days before harvest of pecans. Do not make more than three total applications per season of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos to almonds, pecans and filberts and no more than two applications per season on walnuts. Do not apply more than a total of 8 pints of Lorsban Advanced (3.76 lb ai Chlorpyrifos) per acre per season as a foliar spray. Do not make a second application of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlo rpyrifos within 10 days of the first application. Tree nut orchard floors Do not apply within 14 days before harvest. Do not make more than two applications of Lorsban Advanced or other product cont aining chlorpyrifos per season to the orchard floor. Do not apply more than a to tal of 8 pints of Lorsban Advanced (3.76 lb ai Chlorpyrifos) per acre per season to the orchard floor. Do not make a second application of Lorsban Advanced or other pr oduct containing chlorpyrifos within 10 days of the first application. Apple Only one application of any chlorpyrifos containing product can be made per year. The application can be either a pre-bloo m dormant/delayed dormant spray to the canopy or the trunk, or a post-bloom applicat ion to the lower 4 feet of the trunk [for post-bloom application instructions and restrictions on apple refer to Tree Fruits and Tree Nuts (Trunk Spray or Preplant Dip) section of the label. Pear Do not make more than one postharvest application (prior to dormancy) per year. Do not harvest or use treated fruit for food or feed. Peach and Nectarine Preplant Dip Application – For preplant c ontrol of peachborer, use Lorsban Advanced at the equivalent application rate of 3 quarts per 100 gallons of water. Dip trees several inches above the grafting bud scar and plant immediately or allow them to dry before returning to storage. Do not allow peach trees to remain in contact with the dip solution.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 63



### Table 4. (cont.) Label Use Restrictions App licable for Pome, Stone, and Grapes from Lorsban ® 

### Advanced Insecticide Label

Tree Fruits and Tree Nuts Apply Lorsban Advanced to tree trunks and lower branches using a coarse, lowpressue spray to control pest listed in the follo wing table. Use a higher rate in the rate range when there is increased pest pressure . Unless otherwise specificed, a second application may be made after two week and a third application may be made after harvest. For control of peach tree borer in establ ished trees, apply before newly hatched borers enter the tree. Use as a coarse, low- pressue trunk spay and thoroughly wet all bark areas from ground level to scaffold limbs. Do not allow spray to contact fruit. Do not apply within 14 days before harvest of almonds, peaches and nectarines or withing 21 days before harvest of cherries. Do not make more than one chlorpyrifos application per year in peaches and nectarines and no more than three chlorpyrifos application per year in cherries. Cherries Avoid spray contact with foliage in swee t cherries as premature leaf drop may result. Grape Soil surface Application – Apply Lorsban Advanced just before the pest emerges from the soil. Apply 2 quarts of the diluted spra y mixture to the soil surface on a 15-square foot area (4.4 ft circle) around the based of each vine. Do not allow spray to contact fruit of foliage. Prebloom Application – Apply as a spray drench ground application using a minimum spray volumen of 25 gpa. Do not use in conjunction with soil surface application for grape borer control. Do not apply within 35 days before harvest. Do not make more than one application per season of Lorsban Advanced or other product containing chlorpyrifos. Based on available residue data, the use of Lorsban Advanced in grapes is restricted to areas east of the Continental Divide only.Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 64



### Table 5. Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File APPLE 2004 536 8 528 0.0012 0.67 PCT 217 1 216 0.004 ZEROES 496 2005 536 8 528 0.0012 1/2LOD 991

215 0 215 0.004 DETECTS 17 aver LOD 0.002012 TOTAL 1504 17 1487 1504 1/2LOD= 0.001006

APPLE JUICE 2007 368 0 368 0.006272 0.67 PCT ZEROES 121 1/2LOD 247

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.006272 TOTAL 368 0 368 368 1/2LOD= 0.003136

APPLE SAUCE 2006 714 0 714 0.002047 0.67 CT ZEROES 236 1/2LOD 478

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.002047 714 0 714 714 1/2LOD= 0.001024

ASPARAGUS imports 2003+2008 513 17 496 0.011285 0.44 CT ZEROES 287 1/2LOD 209

DETECTS 17 aver LOD 0.011285 TOTAL 513 17 496 513 1/2LOD= 0.005642

ASPARAGUS domestic 2003+2008 207 4 203 0.005088 0.44 CT ZEROES 116 1/2LOD 87

DETECTS 4 aver LOD 0.005088 TOTAL 207 4 203 207 1/2LOD= 0.002544Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 65



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File ASPARAGUS canned 2003 354 6 348 0.004 0.44 CT ZEROES 198 1/2LOD 150

DETECTS 6 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 354 6 348 354 1/2LOD= 0.002

BANANA 2006-2008 1486 3 1483 0.003713 0.14 CT 0.0038 ZEROES 1278 0.004 1/2LOD 205

DETECTS 3 aver LOD 0.003713 TOTAL 1486 3 1483 1486 1/2LOD= 0.001857

Green Beans 2007-2008 1480 14 1466 0.003428 0.07 CT ZEROES 1376 1/2LOD 90

DETECTS 14 aver LOD 0.003428 TOTAL 1480 14 1466 1480 1/2LOD= 0.001714

Green Beans, Canned 2003-2004 928 0 928 0.00471 0.07 CT ZEROES 863 1/2LOD 65

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.00471 TOTAL 928 0 928 928 1/2LOD= 0.002355

Green Beans, Frozen 2005 555 1 554 0.004569 0.07 CT ZEROES 516 1/2LOD 38

DETECTS 1 aver LOD 0.004569 TOTAL 555 1 554 555 1/2LOD= 0.002285Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 66



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Green Peas 2007-2008 1480 14 1466 0.003428 0.05 CT ZEROES 1406 1/2LOD 60

DETECTS 14 aver LOD 0.003428 TOTAL 1480 14 1466 1480 1/2LOD= 0.001714

Sweet peas, frozen 2007-2008 1293 0 1293 0.004027 0.05 CT ZEROES 1228 1/2LOD 65

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.004027 TOTAL 1293 0 1293 1293 1/2LOD= 0.002014

Beef - PDP Adipose, Liver and Muscle 2002 100 0 100 0.20 CT ZEROES 80 1/2LOD 20

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.0028 TOTAL 100 0 100 100 1/2LOD= 0.0014

Beet Transalation of Sweet Potatoes PDP 2003, 2004 and 2008 1639 165 1474 0.002142 0.21 CT ZEROES 1295 1/2LOD 179

DETECTS 165 aver LOD 0.002142 TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071

Broccoli - PDP 2006-08 1475 108 1367 0.37 CT ZEROES 929 1/2LOD 438

DETECTS 108 aver LOD 0.0012 TOTAL 1475 108 1367 1475 1/2LOD= 0.0006Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 67



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Brussel Sprout from Broccoli - PDP 2006-08 1475 266 1209 0.91 CT ZEROES 133 1/2LOD 1077

DETECTS 266 aver LOD 0.0012 TOTAL 1475 266 1209 1475 1/2LOD= 0.0006

Cauliflower - PDP

04 05 06 

### 1492 8 1484 0.0018 0.46 CT ZEROES 806 1/2LOD 678

DETECTS 8 aver LOD 0.001798 TOTAL 1492 8 1484 1492 1/2LOD= 0.000899

Cherry - PDP 2007 2007 419 0 419 0.53 CT ZEROES 197 1/2LOD 222

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.00273 419 0 419 419 1/2LOD= 0.001365

Collards- PDP 2006-2008 2006-08 679 22 657 0.13 CT ZEROES 591 1/2LOD 66

DETECTS 22 aver LOD 0.004148 TOTAL 679 22 657 679 1/2LOD= 0.002074

Turnip Greens translation from Collards- PDP 2006-2008 2006-08 679 22 657 0.19 CT adjusted 7 ZEROES 556 1/2LOD 101

DETECTS 29 aver LOD 0.004148 TOTAL 686 29 657 686 1/2LOD= 0.002074Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 68



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Kale PDP 2006-2008 (also for mustard and rape) 2006-08 802 36 766 0.05 CT ZEROES 762 1/2LOD 4

DETECTS 36 aver LOD 0.003855 TOTAL 802 36 766 802 1/2LOD= 0.001928

Corn, Sweet - 2008 152 0 152 0.18 CT ZEROES 125 1/2LOD 27

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.014434 TOTAL 152 0 152 152 1/2LOD= 0.007217

Corn, Sweet, frozen 2008 and 03 580 0 580 0.18 CT ZEROES 476 1/2LOD 104

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.004693 TOTAL 580 0 580 580 1/2LOD= 0.002347

Cranberries - PDP 2006 316 71 245 0.70 CT ZEROES 95 1/2LOD 150

0 DETECTS 71 aver LOD 0.004661 TOTAL 316 71 245 316 1/2LOD= 0.00233

Cucumber -PDP 2003 2004 1296 25 1271 0.06 CT ZEROES 1218 1/2LOD 53

0 DETECTS 25 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1296 25 1271 1296 1/2LOD= 0.002Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 69



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Cucumber -PDP u sed for Pumpkin 2003 2004 1296 25 1271 0.07 CT ZEROES 1205 1/2LOD 66

0 DETECTS 25 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1296 25 1271 1296 1/2LOD= 0.002

Grape - PDP 2004 and 05 domestic 2004/2005 761 15 746 0.06 CT ZEROES 715 1/2LOD 31

DETECTS 15 aver LOD 0.003863 TOTAL 761 15 746 761 1/2LOD= 0.001932

Grape - PDP 2004 and 05 imports trun cated to 0.01 for new tolerance 2004/2005 712 165 547 1.00 CT ZEROES 0 1/2LOD 547

DETECTS 165 aver LOD 0.003585 TOTAL 712 165 547 712 1/2LOD= 0.001793

Grape - raisin PDP data 2006/2007 744 5 739 0.06 CT ZEROES 699 1/2LOD 40

DETECTS 5 aver LOD 0.005161 TOTAL 744 5 739 744 1/2LOD= 0.002581

GrapeFruit PDP data 1485 24 1461 0.23 CT ZEROES 1143 1/2LOD 318

DETECTS 24 aver LOD 0.001727 TOTAL 1485 24 1461 1485 1/2LOD= 0.000863Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 70



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Lettuce PDP data - no use, but tolerance listed 1486 42 1444 0.028 CT ZEROES 1444 1/2LOD 0

DETECTS 42 aver LOD 0.002014 TOTAL 1486 42 1444 1486 1/2LOD= 0.001007

ORANGE - processed 2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.004 0.09 CT ZEROES 1350 1/2LOD 99

DETECTS 34 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

ORANGE - fresh 2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.004 0.45 CT ZEROES 816 1/2LOD 633

DETECTS 34 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

ORANGE -juice 2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.09 CT ZEROES 1353 1/2LOD 130

DETECTS 4 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

Peaches domestic 2008/06 849 23 826 0.35 CT ZEROES 552 1/2LOD 274

DETECTS 23 aver LOD 0.008435 TOTAL 849 23 826 849 1⁄2LOD= 0.004217Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 71



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Peaches import 2008/06 406 194 212 0.90 CT ZEROES 41 1/2LOD 171

DETECTS 194 aver LOD 0.003719 TOTAL 406 194 212 406 1/2LOD= 0.00186

Nectarines domestic 2008/07 806 9 797 0.30 CT ZEROES 564 1/2LOD 233

DETECTS 9 aver LOD 0.005 TOTAL 806 9 797 806 1/2LOD= 0.0025

Nectarine import 2008/07 424 147 277 0.75 CT ZEROES 106 1/2LOD 171

DETECTS 147 aver LOD 0.005 TOTAL 424 147 277 424 1/2LOD= 0.0025

Pears - PDP 2008/07 1483 33 1450 0.25 CT ZEROES 1112 1/2LOD 338

DETECTS 33 aver LOD 0.003372 TOTAL 1483 33 1450 1483 1/2LOD= 0.001686

Sweet Peppers 2003/04 1299 232 1067 0.20 CT ZEROES 1039 1/2LOD 28

DETECTS 232 aver LOD 0.0012 TOTAL 1299 232 1067 1299 1/2LOD= 0.0006Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 72



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Plums - PDP domestic 2005-2006 659 20 639 0.09 CT ZEROES 600 1/2LOD 39

DETECTS 20 aver LOD 0.005618 TOTAL 659 20 639 659 1/2LOD= 0.002809

Plums - PDP imports 2005-2006 424 110 314 0.30 CT ZEROES 297 1/2LOD 17

DETECTS 110 aver LOD 0.006031 TOTAL 424 110 314 424 1/2LOD= 0.003016

Plums, prunes dried - PDP 2005 -2006 377 0 377 0.09 CT ZEROES 343 1/2LOD 34

DETECTS 0 aver LOD 0.005427 TOTAL 377 0 377 377 1/2LOD= 0.002714

Strawbery-PDP LOD 2004-05+08 2209 66 2143 0.33 CT ZEROES 1480 1/2LOD 663

DETECTS 66 aver LOD 0.00256 TOTAL 2209 66 2143 2209 1/2LOD= 0.00128

Sweet Potatoe-PDP LOD 2004-03+08 1639 165 1474 0.65 CT ZEROES 574 1/2LOD 900

DETECTS 165 aver LOD 0.002142 TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 73



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Radish from Sweet Potatoe-PDP LOD 2004-03+08 1639 165 1474 0.19 CT ZEROES 1328 1/2LOD 146

DETECTS 165 aver LOD 0.002142 TOTAL 1639 165 1474 1639 1/2LOD= 0.001071

Almonds PDP LOD 2007-08 547 232 315 0.43 CT ZEROES 312 1/2LOD 3

DETECTS 232 aver LOD 0.001 TOTAL 547 232 315 547 1/2LOD= 0.0005

Almonds PDP used for walnuts LOD 2007-08 547 232 315 0.55 CT ZEROES 246 1/2LOD 69

DETECTS 232 aver LOD 0.001 TOTAL 547 232 315 547 1/2LOD= 0.0005

Almonds PDP adjusted for hazelnuts LOD 2007-08 1160 232 928 0.20 CT ZEROES 928 1/2LOD 0

DETECTS 232 aver LOD 0.001 TOTAL 1160 232 928 1160 1/2LOD= 0.0005

Almonds PDP adjusted for pecans LOD 2007-08 663 232 431 0.35 CT ZEROES 431 1/2LOD 0

DETECTS 232 aver LOD 0.001 TOTAL 663 232 431 663 1/2LOD= 0.0005Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 74



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File ORANGE - fresh translated to other tangerine, and citrons 2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.10 CT ZEROES 1335 1/2LOD 114

DETECTS 34 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

ORANGE -juice translated to tangerine and citrons 2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.10 CT ZEROES 1338 1/2LOD 145

DETECTS 4 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

ORANGE - fresh translated to lime and lemon 2004/06 1483 34 1449 0.29 CT ZEROES 1053 1/2LOD 396

DETECTS 34 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1483 34 1449 1483 1/2LOD= 0.002

ORANGE -juice translated to lime and lemon 2004/06 1487 4 1483 0.004 0.29 CT ZEROES 1056 1/2LOD 427

DETECTS 4 aver LOD 0.004 TOTAL 1487 4 1483 1487 1/2LOD= 0.002

Cabbage -2004-2007-FDA 2004/07 255 3 252 0.22 CT ZEROES 199 1/2LOD 53

DETECTS 3 aver LOD 0.005 TOTAL 255 3 252 255 1/2LOD= 0.0025Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 75



### Table 5. (cont.) Summary of RDF Data File Construction

PDP Year Used Sample N # Detects Count LOD LOD value RDF File Chinese Cabbage -2004-2007-FDA 2004/07 255 3 252 0.05 CT ZEROES 242 1/2LOD 10

DETECTS 3 aver LOD 0.005 TOTAL 255 3 252 255 1/2LOD= 0.0025Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 76



### Appendix A—DATA to Support Percentage of Imported Commodities Consumed by US PopulationDow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 77Data from USDA FAO PSD (29) summarized touse four year averages to calculate conservative percent import consumption basedon percentage of imports in total domestic consumption for peaches, nectarines, plums, grapes and pears. Due to the large amount ofprocessed asparagus, the percentimport consumption for fresh asparagus was calculated based on percentage of imports in totalsupply.CommodityAttributeCountry2006/20072007/20082008/20092009/20104 yearaverage% of importconsumptionFreshPeaches &NectarinesProduction (MT) United States 1,105,994 1,269,061 1,302,563 1,194,3541,217,993Imports (MT)United States60,46059,68867,44054,00060,397 9.1%Total Supply (MT) United States 1,166,454 1,328,749 1,370,003 1,248,3541,278,390Fresh Dom.Consumption (MT)United States621,336611,313720,445688,354660,362Exports (MT) United States 86,400 105,359 120,034 100,000102,948For Processing (MT)United States458,718612,077529,524460,000515,080Total Distribution (MT) United States 1,166,454 1,328,749 1,370,003 1,248,3541,278,390Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 78CommodityAttributeCountry2006/20072007/20082008/20092009/20104 yearaverage% of importconsumptionFreshPlums &PrunesProduction (MT) United States 684,920 352,895 381,120 0354,734Imports (MT)United States30,98035,63036,600025,803 7.4%Total Supply(MT) United States 715,900 388,525 417,720 0380,536Fresh Dom.Consumption(MT)United States666,600346,565375,7200347,221Exports, Fresh(MT) United States 49,300 41,960 42,000 033,315TotalDistribution(MT)United States715,900388,525417,7200380,536CommodityAttributeCountry2006/20072007/20082008/20092009/20104 yearaverage% of importconsumptionGrapes,FreshProduction(MT)UnitedStates 723,561 834,909 893,758 828,000820,057Imports(MT)UnitedStates586,025569,298625,616660,000610,23554.4%Total Supply(MT)UnitedStates 1,309,586 1,404,207 1,519,374 1,488,0001,430,292Fresh Dom.Consumption(MT)UnitedStates1,035,4731,103,2991,183,3291,165,0001,121,775Exports (MT)UnitedStates 274,113 300,908 336,045 323,000308,517TotalDistribution(MT)UnitedStates1,309,5861,404,2071,519,3741,488,0001,430,292Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 79CommodityAttributeCountry2006/20072007/20082008/20092009/20104 yearaverage% of importconsumptionPears, FreshProduction(MT)UnitedStates 754,000 791,000 789,200 848,000795,550Imports(MT)UnitedStates107,40985,83783,94785,00090,54820.8%Total Supply(MT)UnitedStates 861,409 876,837 873,147 933,000886,098Fresh Dom.Consumption(MT)UnitedStates434,557425,062432,690448,123435,108Exports (MT)UnitedStates 127,115 161,564 150,200 165,000150,970ForProcessing(MT)UnitedStates299,737290,211290,257319,877300,021TotalDistribution(MT)UnitedStates 861,409 876,837 873,147 933,000886,098CommodityAttributeCountry2004/20052005/20062006/20074 yearaverage% of import from totalsupplyAsparagus,FreshProduction(MT)UnitedStates 81,830 83,000 082,415Imports(MT)UnitedStates108,321109,0000108,66156.9%Total Supply(MT)UnitedStates 190,151 192,000 0191,076Exports,Fresh (MT)UnitedStates10,26812,300011,284Fresh Dom.Consumption(MT)UnitedStates 154,574 15,500 085,037ForProcessing(MT)UnitedStates25,309164,200094,755TotalDistribution(MT)UnitedStates 190,151 192,000 0191,076Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 80CommodityAttribute2005/20062006/20072007/2008Raisins Beginning Stocks (MT) 250,000 230,000 180,000Production (MT)316,245280,502316,525Imports (MT) 21,61424,79122,000Total Supply (MT)587,859535,293518,525Exports (MT) 109,500 115,565 120,000Domestic Consumption (MT)248,359239,728260,000Ending Stocks (MT) 230,000 180,000 138,525Total Distribution (MT)587,859535,293518,525% Import of Consumption8.7%10.3%8.5%Oranges, FreshProduction(1000 MT)UnitedStates9,1418,34474448,310Imports (1000MT)UnitedStates779011092Total Supply(1000 MT)UnitedStates9,2188,43475548,402Exports (1000MT)UnitedStates613494525544Fresh Dom.Consumption(1000 MT)UnitedStates1,4061,31413771,366For Processing(1000 MT)UnitedStates7,1996,62656526,492 77%<-percent totalsupply that isprocessedTotalDistribution(1000 MT)UnitedStates9,2188,43475548,402Dow AgroSciences LLCStudy ID: 101760Page 81Data from USDA’s ERS data (30)Table 1--U.S. bell peppers, alluses: Supply, utilization, andprice, farm weight, 1960-2008used toderive % of consumed imports.YearFreshImportsDomesticUsepercentimportsconsumed2005 652.574 2099.8 31.12006 716.143 2100.68 34.22007 prelim 726.412 2041.32 35.62008 forcast 740 2080 35.64 yr average 708.7825 2080.45134.1Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 82



### Appendix B—RDF Residue files prepared for DEEMDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 83



### Almond PDP RFD 10 ALMOND doc 43 PCT implies TOTALNZ= 232 TOTALLOD = 3 LODRES = 0.0005 doc TOTALZ = 312 doc 0.001043 0.00584 0.010832 0.00104 0.0019 0.0011 0.0014 0.001116 0.0133 0.001378 0.0023 0.0058 0.0019 0.0017 0.0016 0.022078 0.00365 0.0069 0.005672 0.001146 0.00148 0.002 0.003581 0.00101 0.001343 0.003194 0.003137 0.001511 0.0014 0.0076 0.001 0.0018 0.00218 0.0036 0.002 0.002048 0.0015 0.00514 0.002 0.001437 0.001131 0.0041 0.0064 0.0108 0.0041 0.006695 0.007489 0.002634 0.0103 0.002581 0.0017 0.001816 0.0019 0.0029 0.0033 0.0015 0.001079 0.0034 0.0155 0.001904 0.001143 0.003604 0.0028 0.007168 0.00333 0.0013 0.001552 0.002073 0.004466 0.0035 0.00659 0.0013 0.0019 0.00197 0.001354 0.004317 0.0021 0.004657 0.00543 0.0021 0.004919 0.011711 0.001 0.0036 0.002718 0.009486 0.002 0.00269 0.005 0.0025 0.00687 0.00302 0.0024 0.00147 0.004361 0.006643 0.0059 0.008 0.0076 0.0059 0.0077 0.0026 0.001478 0.001065 0.024804 0.006787 0.002606 0.0013 0.00277 0.004791 0.002425 0.009487 0.001334 0.0027 0.001 0.014108 0.0027 0.0023 0.00155 0.001402 0.006159 0.004858 0.0151 0.0036 0.007305 0.008964 0.002639 0.004611 0.002837 0.009427 0.002167 0.002433 0.001966 0.002151 0.001522 0.009372 0.011869 0.005716 0.002388 0.006403 0.002161 0.003205 0.009631 0.005017 0.0023 0.0045 0.0478 0.0011 0.0012 0.0011 0.0123 0.0038 0.0072 0.0015 0.0025 0.0055 0.0057 0.0028 0.0014 0.0012 0.0016 0.0089 0.0022 0.0064 0.0011 0.0031 0.0016 0.0021 0.001 0.0027 0.0045 0.0016 0.0015 0.0022 0.0021 0.0018 0.0035 0.0011 0.0017 0.0024 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0073 0.0033 0.0016 0.0034 0.0043 0.0012 0.0015 0.0017 0.0011Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 84

0.0037 0.0071 0.006992 0.002519 0.001334 0.001596 0.001341 0.001014 0.00145 0.0024 0.005338 0.004154 0.014389 0.006322 0.0018 0.007 0.00677 0.0068 0.0017 0.003027 0.00492 0.00387 0.0138 0.0082 0.0021 0.0059 0.0077 0.0012 0.0031 0.0037 0.0234 0.0043 0.0042 0.0013 0.0108 0.0013 0.0023 0.0011 0.0032 0.0021 

### APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf APPLES doc assume 67 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 247 LODRES = 0.003136 TOTALZ = 121 doc 

### APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf APPLE Sauce doc assume 67 PCT TOTALLOD = 478 LODRES = 0.0001024 TOTALZ = 236 doc 

### APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf APPLES doc assume 67 PCT TOTALNZ = 17 TOTALLOD = 991 LODRES = 0.001006 TOTALZ = 496 doc 0.002 0.0072 0.002 0.007 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.016 0.0057 0.002 0.013 0.01 0.002 0.002 0.0087 0.0076



### Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf ASPARAGUS doc at imports use 44 PCT TOTALNZ = 17 TOTALLOD = 209 LODRES = 0.005642 TOTALZ = 287 doc 0.0063 0.039 0.06 0.018 0.0063 0.007 0.0084 0.48 0.028 0.003 0.019 0.012 0.078 0.003 0.015 0.02 0.13



### Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf ASPARAGUS doc 44 PCT domestic TOTALNZ = 4 TOTALLOD = 87 LODRES = 0.002544 TOTALZ = 116 doc this is for 44 PCT 0.0063 0.021 0.0063 0.026Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 85



### Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf ASPARAGUS doc 44 PCT TOTALNZ = 6 TOTALLOD = 150 LODRES = 0.002 doc half the LOD = 0.004 TOTALZ = 1198 doc 0.0063 0.017 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.025 

### Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf BANANA doc 2006-2008 PDP data TOTALNZ = 3 TOTALLOD = 205 LODRES = 0.00186 TOTALZ = 1278 doc this is for 14 PCT exposure 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 

### Beef PDP 37.rdf Beef doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 20 LODRES = 0.0014 TOTALZ = 80 doc 

### Broccoli PDP 17.rdf BROCCOLI doc 2006-2008 with 37 PCT, TOTALNZ = 108 TOTALLOD = 438 LODRES = 0.0006 doc half the averaged LOD TOTALZ = 929 doc 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0058 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0048 0.002 0.006 0.002 0.0044 0.0051 0.011 0.0093 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0057 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.017 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0073 0.002 0.002 0.0072 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0062 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0083 0.002 0.002 0.02 0.002 0.0049 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0055 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0065 0.002 0.038 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.036 0.002Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 86

0.002 0.014 0.002 0.002 0.0056 0.0071 0.002 0.0084 

### Brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf BRUSSEL SPROUTS doc using BEAD 2000 91 PCT translated from broccoli TOTALNZ = 266 TOTALLOD = 1077 LODRES = 0.0006 TOTALZ = 133 doc 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0058 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0048 0.002 0.006 0.002 0.0044 0.0051 0.011 0.0093 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0057 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.017 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.02 0.002 0.0049 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.0056 0.0071 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0055 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0065 0.002 0.038 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.036 0.002 0.002 0.0084 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0057 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.017 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0073 0.002 0.002 0.0072 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0062 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0083 0.002 0.002 0.02 0.002 0.0049 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0065 0.002 0.038 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.036 0.002 0.002 0.0084 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 87

0.002 0.0073 0.002 0.002 0.0072 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0062 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0083 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0058 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0048 0.002 0.006 0.002 0.0044 0.0051 0.011 0.0093 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.0056 0.0071 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0055 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426 0.00426



### Cabbage FDA 22.rdf Cabbage doc 22 PCT and FDA data on cabbage TOTALNZ = 3 TOTALLOD = 53 LODRES = 0.0025 doc half the LOD = 0.005 based on 302 FDA method TOTALZ = 199 doc 0.002 0.4 0.012 

### canned green beans PDP 43.rdf Beans canned doc 7PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 65 LODRES = 0.002355 TOTALZ = 863 doc 

### Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf Canned peach doc 35 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 35 LODRES = 0.005 TOTALZ = 65 doc 

### Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf Cauliflower doc using 46 PCT and 04 05 and 06 PDP data TOTALNZ = 8 TOTALLOD = 678 LODRES = 0.0009 doc half the average LOD method TOTALZ = 806 doc 0.002 0.0096 0.007 0.0048 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 

### Cherry PDP 33.rdf Cherry doc 53 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 222 LODRES = 0.001365 doc based on 2007 PDP TOTALZ = 197 

### Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf Chinese cabbage doc 5 PCTDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 88

TOTALNZ = 3 TOTALLOD = 10 LODRES = 0.0025 doc half the LOD = 0.005 based on 302 FDA method TOTALZ = 242 doc 0.002 0.04 0.012 

### Collard PDP 20.rdf Collard doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 13 PCT TOTALNZ = 22 TOTALLOD = 66 LODRES = 0.002074 TOTALZ = 591 doc 0.0065 0.035 0.025 0.007 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 6.3 0.034 0.44 0.007 0.015 0.007 0.24 0.0063 0.0063 0.025 0.0063 0.0063 0.033 0.0063



### Corn PDP 34.rdf Corn grain doc 23 PCT based on observed residues TOTALNZ = 195 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc based on 2007 PDP TOTALZ = 455 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.008 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.006 0.007 0.004 0.008 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.004Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 89

0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.008 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.007 0.005 0.008 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.005



### Cranberry PDP 16.rdf Cranberry doc 70 PCT TOTALNZ = 71 TOTALLOD = 150 LODRES = 0.002347 doc based on weighted average TOTALZ = 95 0.032 0.014 0.0052 0.028 0.093 0.02 0.0067 0.034 0.033 0.0075 0.061 0.032 0.02 0.027 0.007 0.0097 0.014 0.046 0.013 0.018 0.015 0.0068 0.01 0.021 0.068 0.026 0.014 0.007 0.0081 0.018 0.005 0.007 0.024 0.032 0.026 0.0067 0.0086 0.058 0.025 0.023 0.027 0.026 0.04 0.069 0.038 0.029 0.02 0.035 0.047 0.088 0.019 0.025 0.09 0.0062 0.0052 0.0053 0.037 0.0049 0.021 0.027 0.0058 0.0067 0.0074 0.0077 0.013 0.027 0.012 0.057 0.007 0.03 0.026



### Cucumber PDP 53.rdf Cucumber doc using 6 TOTALNZ = 25 TOTALLOD = 53 LODRES = 0.002 doc TOTALZ = 1218 doc 0.036 0.038 0.016 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.037 0.007 0.007 0.03 0.007 0.007 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.12 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.026 0.007



### Eggs 48 EPA.rdfDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 90

Poultry eggs doc using acute using BEAD 2000 RDF procedure TOTALNZ = 10 TOTALLOD = 0 TOTALZ = 90 doc 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105



### Fig tolerance 41.rdf Fig doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 1 PCT and tolerance TOTALNZ = 1 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0025 TOTALZ = 99 doc 0.01 

### Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf Filbert doc 20 PCT TOTALNZ= 232 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc TOTALZ = 928 doc 0.001043 0.00584 0.010832 0.00104 0.0019 0.0011 0.0014 0.001116 0.0133 0.001378 0.0023 0.0058 0.0019 0.0017 0.0016 0.022078 0.00365 0.0069 0.005672 0.001146 0.00148 0.002 0.003581 0.00101 0.001343 0.003194 0.003137 0.001511 0.0014 0.0076 0.001 0.0018 0.00218 0.0036 0.002 0.002048 0.0103 0.002581 0.0017 0.001816 0.0019 0.0029 0.0033 0.0015 0.001079 0.0034 0.0155 0.001904 0.001143 0.003604 0.0028 0.007168 0.00333 0.0013 0.001552 0.002073 0.004466 0.0035 0.00659 0.0013 0.0019 0.00197 0.001354 0.004317 0.0021 0.004657 0.00543 0.0021 0.004919 0.011711 0.001 0.0036 0.0059 0.008 0.0076 0.0059 0.0077 0.0026 0.001478 0.001065 0.024804 0.006787 0.002606 0.0013 0.00277 0.004791 0.002425 0.009487 0.001334 0.0027 0.001 0.014108 0.0027 0.0023 0.00155 0.001402 0.006159 0.004858 0.0151 0.0036 0.007305 0.008964 0.002639 0.004611 0.002837 0.009427 0.002167 0.002433 0.0023 0.0045 0.0478 0.0011 0.0012 0.0011 0.0123 0.0038 0.0072 0.0015 0.0025 0.0055 0.0057 0.0028 0.0014 0.0012 0.0016 0.0089 0.0022 0.0064 0.0011 0.0031 0.0016 0.0021 0.001 0.0027 0.0045 0.0016 0.0015 0.0022 0.0021 0.0018 0.0035 0.0011 0.0017 0.0024Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 91

0.0015 0.00514 0.002 0.001437 0.001131 0.0041 0.0064 0.0108 0.0041 0.006695 0.007489 0.002634 0.0037 0.0071 0.006992 0.002519 0.001334 0.001596 0.001341 0.001014 0.00145 0.0024 0.002718 0.009486 0.002 0.00269 0.005 0.0025 0.00687 0.00302 0.0024 0.00147 0.004361 0.006643 0.005338 0.004154 0.014389 0.006322 0.0018 0.007 0.00677 0.0068 0.0017 0.003027 0.001966 0.002151 0.001522 0.009372 0.011869 0.005716 0.002388 0.006403 0.002161 0.003205 0.009631 0.005017 0.00492 0.00387 0.0138 0.0082 0.0021 0.0059 0.0077 0.0012 0.0031 0.0037 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0073 0.0033 0.0016 0.0034 0.0043 0.0012 0.0015 0.0017 0.0011 0.0234 0.0043 0.0042 0.0013 0.0108 0.0013 0.0023 0.0011 0.0032 0.0021 

### Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf Frozen Green beans doc 7 PCT TOTALNZ = 1 TOTALLOD = 38 LODRES = 0.002285 TOTALZ = 516 doc 0.007 

### Frozen peas PDP 98.rdf Frozen Pea doc 5 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 65 LODRES = 0.002014 TOTALZ = 1228 

### Frozen sweet corn PDP 96.rdf Corn doc 18 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 104 LODRES = 0.002347 doc based on 2007 PDP TOTALZ = 476 

### Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf Grape doc using 6 PCT TOTALNZ = 15 TOTALLOD = 31 LODRES = 0.001932 TOTALZ = 715 doc 0.031 0.0063 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.091 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.007 0.007 0.007



### Grape imports PDP 94.rdf Grape doc using 100 PCT TOTALNZ = 165 TOTALLOD = 547 LODRES = 0.001793 TOTALZ = 0 doc 0.0063 0.0063 0.01 0.01Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 92

0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01



### Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf Grape fruit Juice doc BEAD said 16 PCT ; may TAT/AVG is .21 TOTALNZ = 6 TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 TOTALZ = 1252 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

### Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf Grape fruit doc 23 PCT PDP 2005 and 2006Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 93

TOTALNZ = 24 TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.000863 doc cut to half the average LOD TOTALZ = 1143 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0036 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0069 0.0029 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 

### 5B green PDP 21.rdf 5b greens doc using PCT 1 and collard PDP 2006 and 2007 TOTALNZ = 14 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.002155 TOTALZ = 1386 doc 0.0065 0.035 0.025 0.007 0.0063 0.034 0.44 0.007 0.0063 0.015 0.007 0.0063 0.0063 6.3



### Green beans PDP 42.rdf Green beans doc 7 PCT TOTALNZ = 14 TOTALLOD = 90 LODRES = 0.001714 TOTALZ = 1376 doc 0.003 0.04 0.0063 0.045 0.026 0.0063 0.0063 0.013 0.003 0.011 0.015 0.0063 0.015 0.051



### Kale PDP 40.rdf Kale doc PCT of 5 TOTALNZ = 36 TOTALLOD = 4 LODRES = 0.001928 doc half the averaged LOD TOTALZ = 762 0.0065 0.067 0.039 0.024 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.033 0.03 0.007 0.045 0.0063 0.039 0.021 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.1 0.0063 0.0063 0.12 0.007 0.12 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.02 0.007 0.007 0.45 1.1 0.0063 0.018 0.017 

### Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf Kidney Bean doc 2 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 2 LODRES = 0.00871 TOTALZ = 98 

### KIWI FDA 19.rdf Kiwi doc BEAD previous actue decomp file page 125 TOTALNZ = 1000 TOTALLOD = 2971 LODRES = 0.0015 TOTALZ = 3972 0.005774 0.000468 0.013806 0.001581Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 94

0.027184 0.004571 0.035461 0.002448 0.000753 0.84161 2.81E-05 0.83797 0.013271 0.001038 0.022625 0.000126 0.001777 0.005308 0.00206 0.001703 0.000276 0.024086 0.041189 0.026324 0.004259 0.005224 0.044722 0.006386 0.003652 0.084632 0.000108 0.003449 0.000212 0.066089 0.336373 0.014716 0.009631 0.491528 0.120732 23.78547 0.023165 7.04E-05 0.63505 0.611888 0.003536 0.026041 0.000539 0.059298 0.220776 0.001386 0.049039 0.004901 0.006178 0.019393 0.052346 0.028844 0.123647 0.1896 0.006046 0.013404 0.070856 0.108509 0.046543 0.062815 0.073651 0.057156 0.007888 0.068534 0.000484 0.007221 0.003481 0.004107 0.02208 0.008831 0.097544 0.072456 0.031915 0.000444 0.053661 0.127232 0.001855 0.006428 0.003763 0.019862 0.002308 0.00233 0.022121 0.037896 0.068363 0.034925 0.010517 0.184119 0.019292 0.00597 0.005189 0.206363 0.049369 0.003388 0.01119 0.011044 0.02959 0.133957 0.046109 1.334883 0.001918 0.009031 0.015104 0.175101 0.004028 0.002095 0.007134 0.036936 0.012333 0.048255 0.063714 0.001278 0.0891 0.00023 0.007371 0.045767 0.001881 0.003438 0.134033 0.00105 0.044449 0.012377 0.028597 0.002474 0.094791 0.005478 0.016953 0.003704 0.244348 0.038217 0.001965 0.046429 0.028386 0.021329 0.0005 0.003604 0.111376 0.004641 0.00383 2.12E-05 0.000826 0.004117 0.013626 0.001702 0.004016 0.004853 0.010665 0.008679 0.033272 0.017225 0.163458 0.026794 0.034629 0.05281 0.027181 0.001829 0.026145 0.196218 0.011898 0.009324 0.048696 0.008555 0.002048 0.011716 0.037802 0.000264 0.041964 0.092128 0.021056 0.084087 0.002136 0.000924 0.000733 0.214337 0.000298 0.065975 0.024662 0.056538 1.011748 1.7618 0.002159 0.013035 0.065461 0.015675 0.014428 0.001254 0.848811 0.004985 0.007478 0.001472 0.422689 0.000403 0.014053 0.009151 0.032925 128.3317 0.016248 0.239077 0.411628 0.013774 0.010442 0.086356 0.358619 0.021734 0.004532 0.000256 0.004441 0.062013 0.370049 0.00475 0.000604 0.085433 0.001907 0.002918 0.016717 0.002194 0.003109 0.053359 0.001028 0.003636Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 95

0.012665 0.014835 0.199358 0.007321 0.003853 0.017472 0.007671 0.005361 0.05431 0.00038 0.005034 0.000799 0.000835 0.002162 0.136703 0.003005 0.008478 0.074334 0.083874 0.003952 0.116016 0.016045 0.007108 0.033783 0.000651 0.169918 0.001484 0.005871 0.780379 0.105937 0.01873 0.266527 2.556982 0.040614 0.10389 0.000725 0.131296 0.055872 0.000191 0.010692 0.002133 1.836604 0.216155 0.250234 0.037401 0.897839 0.002222 0.012037 0.016395 0.002615 0.009384 0.001879 0.297859 0.143662 0.004806 0.014046 0.027332 0.020683 0.026756 0.023862 0.003107 0.194591 9.6E-05 0.009177 0.0101 0.052613 0.001675 0.08643 0.002186 0.021077 0.076479 0.359973 0.006578 1.589949 0.027638 0.006508 0.000175 0.001343 0.001992 0.04695 0.078468 0.384877 0.09526 0.00157 0.015649 0.002959 0.040394 3.33E-05 0.002844 0.152789 0.228838 0.045578 0.00113 0.010823 0.032578 0.006867 0.157636 0.000974 0.009976 0.018867 0.004071 0.005943 0.025243 0.001225 0.030743 0.000571 0.001184 0.001042 0.080838 0.006926 0.014383 0.003086 0.627758 0.030033 5.97E-05 0.000454 0.010087 0.057456 0.454784 0.060748 0.03254 0.007646 0.000429 0.079262 0.167215 0.30525 0.129024 0.096597 4.444398 0.005034 0.000683 0.335997 0.020029 0.023868 0.012091 0.01525 0.017724 0.266258 0.006163 0.022487 1.526111 0.017022 0.009667 0.569971 0.069528 0.189745 0.027342 0.054053 0.001401 0.024153 0.002311 0.000215 0.757058 0.058969 1.151228 0.023072 0.043264 0.008324 0.059032 0.003365 0.002948 0.090039 0.002243 0.175849 1.219522 0.018592 0.060118 0.000554 0.024295 0.012922 0.066729 0.019152 0.044098 0.020807 0.013328 0.003168 0.022602 0.001619 0.003222 0.016459 0.008138 0.298475 0.080253 0.007065 0.026115 0.000584 0.048012 0.004812 0.035892 0.950824 0.041364 8.1E-05 0.008071 0.00415 0.007996 0.051889 0.000182 0.152832 0.01986 0.235122 0.007398 0.33539 3.415169 0.08817 0.006641 0.002492 0.031927 0.064633 0.145574 0.006777 0.034851 0.097258 0.116582 0.169218 0.011155 0.0011 0.037118 0.000479 0.006482 0.003383Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 96

0.002424 0.04205 0.033506 0.000326 0.03913 0.001093 0.013848 0.1809 0.060928 0.005086 0.0005 0.419004 0.000779 0.000157 0.009302 0.001159 0.030598 6.009815 0.029434 0.164084 0.067058 0.041959 0.043791 0.00095 0.21174 0.076189 0.001462 0.015524 0.006288 0.050072 0.014907 0.005525 0.278437 0.063954 0.012851 0.011711 0.14022 0.017999 0.012481 0.239469 0.000297 0.10069 0.006796 0.001832 0.54245 0.101544 0.000198 0.000353 0.001946 0.055062 0.004518 0.003241 3.903866 0.072268 0.008098 0.047519 0.000421 0.008721 0.018364 0.058807 0.160119 0.17892 0.129039 0.002773 0.014359 0.563994 0.000412 0.003321 0.002523 0.03838 0.020777 0.454092 0.000251 0.168646 0.043246 0.09163 0.081475 0.000811 0.002679 0.011596 0.402851 0.036725 0.004853 0.034728 0.013605 0.137768 0.004173 0.079601 0.004355 0.320794 6.4E-05 0.000999 1.124003 0.065274 0.028106 0.010858 0.021288 0.007997 0.031531 0.148265 0.004457 0.061621 0.021851 0.070182 0.057991 0.004373 0.355538 0.021593 0.003888 0.009082 0.719154 0.042838 0.009834 0.158531 0.025243 0.004344 0.184666 0.192703 0.005438 0.022061 0.02156 0.005941 0.068214 0.009521 0.399473 0.019266 0.002077 0.008384 0.01084 0.000149 0.000752 0.283787 0.002328 0.001115 0.055233 0.000204 0.093442 0.039237 0.002726 0.000288 2.151745 0.313249 0.000131 0.000992 0.04925 0.000704 0.034059 0.125661 0.015492 0.002844 0.004053 0.000531 0.055459 0.003778 0.005626 0.006318 0.001199 0.020538 0.001605 0.006405 0.036272 0.120693 0.003962 0.004693 0.045798 0.001544 0.004415 0.074948 0.012236 0.119482 0.55423 0.254337 0.122319 0.001862 0.003273 0.030854 0.018866 0.383452 0.006898 0.436233 0.000872 0.014887 0.699581 0.003535 0.001798 0.006831 0.001721 0.135713 0.005317 0.015856 0.062752 0.2213 0.009008 0.002762 0.003756 0.011598 0.004581 0.074189 0.011257 0.099623 0.032355 0.10037 0.036838 0.015946 0.002538 0.259605 0.000318 0.008593 0.006507 0.346794 0.153366 0.010515 0.015186 0.050548 0.180903 0.142057 0.521692 0.019631 0.102842 0.147732Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 97

0.001529 0.056669 0.002252 0.015238 0.000923 0.000615 0.111691 0.017014 0.00089 0.000523 0.008633 0.017235 0.063827 0.00359 0.002392 0.006705 0.000667 0.001321 0.036087 0.146539 2.470928 0.003185 0.011559 0.024452 0.023446 0.234131 0.002578 0.009817 0.000399 0.016788 0.088437 0.257768 0.020446 0.001196 0.001265 0.007615 0.01902 0.001603 0.004198 0.276223 0.002497 0.00087 0.008303 0.008041 0.005558 0.010228 0.009774 0.7353 0.032405 0.018272 0.025684 0.000245 0.299976 0.00309 0.039026 0.001366 0.309133 0.090497 0.00621 2.130093 0.00034 0.016197 0.034144 0.039883 0.003806 0.002822 0.448586 0.008448 0.083281 0.005707 0.007407 0.060084 0.009554 0.013099 0.028484 0.095439 0.092825 0.002028 0.04298 0.025495 0.01047 0.022355 0.000604 0.005445 1.020917 0.008953 0.001074 0.696619 0.113503 0.000908 0.982834 0.374451 0.012594 0.014512 0.118169 0.026439 1.20428 0.020088 0.001525 0.223647 0.031029 0.335301 0.003036 0.017824 0.000692 0.000584 0.001287 0.011289 0.050758 0.005615 0.031579 0.006228 0.029879 0.07118 0.082412 0.012662 0.103946 0.000831 0.002807 0.081354 0.010351 0.276134 0.016326 0.001078 0.010788 0.028928 0.035301 0.001762 8.52E-05 0.069008 0.223474 0.001441 0.288565 0.01001 0.002434 0.107349 2.045339 0.144859 0.475786 0.113252 0.001319 0.025457 0.001363 0.003498 0.033719 0.028263 0.018426 0.00425 0.828499 0.139389 0.003322 0.007611 0.200381 0.007761 0.00055 0.072434 0.005817 0.040754 0.000382 0.599332 0.011445 0.013112 0.005607 0.001423 0.044827 0.007215 0.00262 0.013441 7.107445 0.001338 0.008857 0.000134 0.020444 0.024727 0.025545 0.322069 0.0015 0.008228 0.040044 0.106328 0.051291 0.20364 0.023224 0.00087 0.001228 0.20921 0.012179 1.389824 0.002009 0.0004 0.01464 0.001178 0.173471 0.01497 0.077529 0.006034 0.004946 0.009799 0.000176 0.037345 0.071948 0.160381 0.513828 0.050998 3.4E-05 0.00034 0.004284 0.130736 0.026707 0.005745 0.014233 0.90564 0.008889 0.019514 0.023527 0.047408 0.076176 0.00787 0.00115 0.00713Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 98

0.019749 1.471368 0.003376 0.153815 0.115216 0.003688 0.012135 0.000136 0.011966 0.4075 0.001721 0.089162 0.007729 0.013037 0.64781 0.011401 0.255418 0.016884 0.004997 0.12336 0.002674 0.014154 0.198 0.000289 0.008236 0.000705 0.482118 0.290095 0.022984 0.001761 0.035928 0.515369 0.107024 0.044582 3.094105 0.015749 0.051498 0.004722 0.004714 0.575664 0.010289 0.024746 0.004617 0.007482 0.016608 0.002731 0.028934 0.024279 0.001625 0.001427 0.01756 0.099893 0.013781 0.003228 0.007042 0.032837 0.030108 0.00292 0.000643 0.012589 0.010997 0.031199 0.00098 0.010158 0.011547 0.006591 0.000655 0.677573 0.000458 0.00607 0.001646 0.005142 0.000965 0.017952 0.001969 0.003031 0.00258 0.002366 0.005151 0.009471 0.029369 2.907285 0.108237 0.002706 0.000629 0.00526 0.12627 0.000103 1.346068 0.030452 0.077889 0.018247 0.000363 0.005887 0.230534 0.04025 0.002653 0.000896 0.017774 0.049888 0.00077 0.027882 0.038919 0.115456 0.058044 0.002985 0.005374 0.003901 0.000795 0.484525 0.017525 0.042508 0.006977 0.022224 0.009192 0.002278 

### Lemon FDA 29.rdf Lemon doc 29 PCT TOTALNZ = 34 TOTALLOD = 396 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 TOTALZ = 1053 doc 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007



### Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf Based on Orange Juice doc 29 TOTALNZ = 4 TOTALLOD = 427 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 TOTALZ = 1056 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

### Lettuce PDP 25.rdf Lettuce doc using 2.8 PCT and PDP data on lettuceDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 99

TOTALNZ = 42 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.001007 doc half the average LOD method TOTALZ = 1444 doc 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.007 0.007 0.026 0.021 0.0061 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.01 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0055 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.015 0.002 0.06 0.002 0.0057 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.025 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.007



### Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf Nectarine doc 30 PCT TOTALNZ = 9 TOTALLOD = 233 LODRES = 0.0025 TOTALZ = 564 doc 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 

### Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf Nectarine doc using PDP data 2002 and 2006 adjusted to 75 PCT TOTALNZ = 147 TOTALLOD = 171 LODRES = 0.0025 TOTALZ = 106 doc 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.041 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.017 0.039 0.008 0.047 0.052 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.04 0.023 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.07 0.008 0.008 0.021 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.032 0.008 0.039 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.025 0.008 0.008 0.019 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.024 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.018 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.039 0.008 0.008Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 100

0.038 0.049 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.044 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.036 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.017 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.017 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.021 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.036 0.017 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.022 0.022 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.028 0.008 0.008 0.008



### Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf Onion doc assume 57 PCT TOTALLOD = 57 LODRES = 0.005 TOTALZ = 43 doc 

### Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf Orange doc for the fresh 45 TOTALNZ = 34 TOTALLOD = 633 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 TOTALZ = 816 doc this is for 54 PCT 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007



### Orange juice PDP 14.rdf Orange Juice doc 9 PCT for processed juice TOTALNZ = 4 TOTALLOD = 130 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 TOTALZ = 1353 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

### Orange processed PDP 5.rdf Orange doc 9 PCT TOTALNZ = 34 TOTALLOD = 99 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 TOTALZ = 1350 doc this is for 10 PCT 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 101

0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007



### Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdf Citrus Juice doc 10PCT TOTALNZ = 4 TOTALLOD = 145 LODRES = 0.002 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.004 TOTALZ = 1338 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

### Other citrus PDP 24.rdf Citrus doc based on citrus at 10 TOTALNZ = 34 TOTALLOD = 114 LODRES = 0.002 doc set to half the LOD = 0.004 TOTALZ = 1338 doc 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007



### Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf Peach doc domestic 35 TOTALNZ = 23 TOTALLOD = 274 LODRES = 0.004217 TOTALZ = 552 doc 0.054 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.035 0.007 0.007 0.047 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.007 0.007



### Peach PDP 63 import.rdf Peach doc import 90 TOTALNZ = 194 TOTALLOD = 171 LODRES = 0.00186 TOTALZ = 41 doc 0.023 0.007 0.018 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.032 0.007 0.018 0.018 0.003 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.019 0.007 0.016 0.015 0.007 0.032 0.013 0.018 0.007 0.19 0.003 0.003 0.012 0.003 0.003 0.029 0.0074 0.003 0.003 0.0088 0.013 0.016 0.024 0.034 0.007 0.007 0.016 0.007 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 102

0.015 0.007 0.007 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.03 0.041 0.007 0.007 0.043 0.062 0.031 0.007 0.013 0.014 0.007 0.017 0.026 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.082 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.023 0.007 0.093 0.015 0.04 0.022 0.007 0.007 0.066 0.007 0.007 0.02 0.016 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.02 0.039 0.027 0.039 0.015 0.019 0.087 0.024 0.036 0.024 0.041 0.007 0.016 0.051 0.007 0.039 0.051 0.021 0.081 0.014 0.017 0.003 0.003 0.024 0.028 0.025 0.003 0.027 0.032 0.0077 0.003 0.0074 0.065 0.02 0.0094 0.0072 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.023 0.014 0.007 0.047 0.007 0.026 0.007 0.007 0.03 0.003 0.003 0.013 0.013 0.022 0.0089 0.022 0.018 0.007 0.007 0.019 0.033 0.014 0.022 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.027 0.026 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.11 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.021 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.061 0.025 0.007 0.007



### Peanut FDA 50.rdf Peanut doc reusing EPA file from 2000 TOTALNZ =6 TOTALLOD = 94 LODRES = 0.0025 TOTALZ = 0 doc 0.021 0.02 0.02 0.0005 0.04 0.0005 

### Pear PDP 49.rdf Pear doc using PDP data 2003 to 2005 TOTALNZ = 33 TOTALLOD = 338 LODRES = 0.001686 TOTALZ = 1112 doc 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 103

0.0063 0.007 0.015 0.041 0.038 0.007 0.017 0.019 0.021 0.0063 0.025 0.0063 0.007 0.041 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.014 0.0063 0.017 0.0063 0.007 0.007 0.0063 0.024 0.007 0.014



### PeasPDP 60.rdf Pea doc using acute using 5 PCT and PDP green bean data TOTALNZ = 14 TOTALLOD = 60 LODRES = 0.001714 TOTALZ = 1406 doc 0.003 0.04 0.0063 0.045 0.026 0.0063 0.0063 0.013 0.003 0.011 0.015 0.0063 0.015 0.051



### Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf Pecan doc 35 PCT TOTALNZ= 232 TOTALLOD = 0 LODRES = 0.0005 doc TOTALZ = 431 doc 0.001043 0.00584 0.010832 0.00104 0.0019 0.0011 0.0014 0.001116 0.0133 0.001378 0.0023 0.0058 0.0019 0.0017 0.0016 0.022078 0.00365 0.0069 0.005672 0.001146 0.00148 0.002 0.003581 0.00101 0.001343 0.003194 0.003137 0.001511 0.0014 0.0076 0.001 0.0018 0.0103 0.002581 0.0017 0.001816 0.0019 0.0029 0.0033 0.0015 0.001079 0.0034 0.0155 0.001904 0.001143 0.003604 0.0028 0.007168 0.00333 0.0013 0.001552 0.002073 0.004466 0.0035 0.00659 0.0013 0.0019 0.00197 0.001354 0.004317 0.0021 0.004657 0.00543 0.0021 0.0059 0.008 0.0076 0.0059 0.0077 0.0026 0.001478 0.001065 0.024804 0.006787 0.002606 0.0013 0.00277 0.004791 0.002425 0.009487 0.001334 0.0027 0.001 0.014108 0.0027 0.0023 0.00155 0.001402 0.006159 0.004858 0.0151 0.0036 0.007305 0.008964 0.002639 0.004611 0.0023 0.0045 0.0478 0.0011 0.0012 0.0011 0.0123 0.0038 0.0072 0.0015 0.0025 0.0055 0.0057 0.0028 0.0014 0.0012 0.0016 0.0089 0.0022 0.0064 0.0011 0.0031 0.0016 0.0021 0.001 0.0027 0.0045 0.0016 0.0015 0.0022 0.0021 0.0018Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 104

0.00218 0.0036 0.002 0.002048 0.0015 0.00514 0.002 0.001437 0.001131 0.0041 0.0064 0.0108 0.0041 0.006695 0.007489 0.002634 0.0037 0.0071 0.006992 0.002519 0.001334 0.001596 0.001341 0.001014 0.00145 0.0024 0.004919 0.011711 0.001 0.0036 0.002718 0.009486 0.002 0.00269 0.005 0.0025 0.00687 0.00302 0.0024 0.00147 0.004361 0.006643 0.005338 0.004154 0.014389 0.006322 0.0018 0.007 0.00677 0.0068 0.0017 0.003027 0.002837 0.009427 0.002167 0.002433 0.001966 0.002151 0.001522 0.009372 0.011869 0.005716 0.002388 0.006403 0.002161 0.003205 0.009631 0.005017 0.00492 0.00387 0.0138 0.0082 0.0021 0.0059 0.0077 0.0012 0.0031 0.0037 0.0035 0.0011 0.0017 0.0024 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0073 0.0033 0.0016 0.0034 0.0043 0.0012 0.0015 0.0017 0.0011 0.0234 0.0043 0.0042 0.0013 0.0108 0.0013 0.0023 0.0011 0.0032 0.0021 

### Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf PEPPER doc assume 20 PCT TOTALNZ = 232 TOTALLOD = 28 LODRES = 0.0006 TOTALZ = 1299 doc 0.061 0.015 0.002 0.033 0.057 0.11 0.017 0.051 0.56 0.006 0.013 0.0063 0.029 0.0053 0.081 0.002 0.23 0.044 0.023 0.056 0.047 0.047 0.053 0.041 0.017 0.1 0.03 0.0061 0.036 0.26 0.083 0.21 0.037 0.002 0.076 0.008 0.027 0.053 0.14 0.032 0.0048 0.029 0.034 0.002 0.002 0.037 0.002 0.038 0.031 0.002 0.0059 0.059 0.002 0.12 0.057 0.15 0.14 0.036 0.008 0.01 0.0099 0.087 0.002 0.054 0.019 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.22 0.023 0.036 0.0092 0.037 0.021 0.0051 0.002 0.097 0.0075 0.29 0.033 0.0062 0.07 0.12 0.025 0.009 0.025 0.0049 0.01 0.0043 0.029 0.046 0.002Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 105

0.029 0.11 0.026 0.11 0.04 0.002 0.002 0.032 0.12 0.085 0.027 0.031 0.049 0.0073 0.054 0.081 0.0056 0.1 0.31 0.21 0.002 0.041 0.028 0.058 0.093 0.1 0.01 0.038 0.06 0.037 0.11 0.097 0.16 0.033 0.013 0.014 0.002 0.062 0.023 0.13 0.055 0.034 0.002 0.017 0.09 0.35 0.089 0.002 0.028 0.13 0.029 0.024 0.084 0.007 0.11 0.11 0.043 0.04 0.074 0.016 0.002 0.19 0.0041 0.0041 0.027 0.063 0.015 0.049 0.069 0.002 0.017 0.13 0.02 0.002 0.0087 0.014 0.017 0.027 0.081 0.012 0.014 0.074 0.051 0.002 0.002 0.017 0.002 0.046 0.017 0.002 0.002 0.032 0.087 0.28 0.015 0.017 0.038 0.002 0.01 0.013 0.002 0.02 0.47 0.002 0.04 0.03 0.063 0.15 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.057 0.063 0.002 0.046 0.068 0.058 0.083 0.073 0.072 0.13 0.051 0.016 0.074 0.13 0.019 0.15 0.018 0.042 0.048 0.027 0.049 0.057 0.043 0.075 0.026 0.0061 0.066 0.22 0.044 

### Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf Plum doc using PCT 9 TOTALNZ = 20 TOTALLOD = 39 LODRES = 0.002809 TOTALZ = 600 doc 0.013 0.013 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 

### Plum import PDP 93.rdf Plum doc using PCT 30 TOTALNZ = 110 TOTALLOD = 17 LODRES = 0.003016 TOTALZ = 297 doc 0.043 0.013 0.069 0.027 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.005 0.032 0.005 0.025 0.026 0.005 0.005 0.01Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 106

0.013 0.038 0.058 0.12 0.049 0.027 0.013 0.013 0.058 0.013 0.031 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.038 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.062 0.042 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.18 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.023 0.005 0.005 0.034 0.043 0.041 0.005 0.028 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.011 0.015 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.014 0.005 0.005 0.033 0.017 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.021 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.01 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.031 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.068 0.013



### Pork fat PDP 38.rdf Pork fat doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies TOTALNZ = 1 TOTALLOD = 39 LODRES = 0.00075 TOTALZ = 160 doc 0.0025 

### Pork meat PDP 39.rdf Pork meat doc using scaled 20 PCT for beef based on acute EPA studies TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 20 LODRES = 0.000375 TOTALZ = 80 doc 

### Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf Poultry fat doc using acute using BEAD 2000 RDF procedure TOTALNZ = 10 TOTALLOD = 0 TOTALZ = 90 doc 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672 0.000672



### Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf P Poultry doc using acute using BEAD 2000 of 10 PCT and PDP 2006 TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 10 LODRES = 0.00075 TOTALZ = 90 doc 

### Prune PDP 45.rdf Prune doc using PDP data and 9 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 34Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 107

LODRES = 0.002714 TOTALZ = 343 doc 

### Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf Cucumber doc using 7 TOTALNZ = 25 TOTALLOD = 66 LODRES = 0.002 doc TOTALZ = 1205 doc 0.036 0.038 0.016 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.037 0.007 0.007 0.03 0.007 0.007 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.12 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.026 0.007



### Radish PDP 92.rdf radish doc 19 TOTALNZ = 165 TOTALLOD = 146 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method TOTALZ = 1328 doc 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0078 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0076 0.0022 0.0022 0.013 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0065 0.0022 0.0066 0.014 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.026 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0048 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.037 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0082 0.0022 0.084 0.0022 0.0022 0.034 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.015 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.0022 0.0022 0.0066 0.0083 0.0022 0.035 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.011 0.0087 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0064 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 108

0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0085 0.0022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003



### Raisin PDP 54.rdf Raisin doc using PDP data 2006 and 2007 TOTALNZ = 5 TOTALLOD = 40 LODRES = 0.002581 TOTALZ = 699 doc 0.007 0.022 0.013 0.007 0.007 

### Strawberry PDP 36.rdf STRAWBERRY doc using scaled 33 PCT TOTALNZ = 66 TOTALLOD = 663 LODRES = 0.00128 TOTALZ = 1480 doc 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0027 0.0013 0.04 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.009 0.0013 0.0083 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0026 0.0013 0.0013 0.007 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0033 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0083 0.0013 0.035 0.003 0.003 0.014 0.003 0.003 0.0069 0.0097



### Sunflower 62.rdf Sunflower doc using 9 PCT TOTALNZ = 9 TOTALLOD = 0 TOTALZ = 91 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046



### Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf Sweet Corn doc 18 PCT TOTALNZ = 0 TOTALLOD = 27 LODRES = 0.007217 doc based on 2007 PDP TOTALZ = 125 

### sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdfDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 109

Sweet potato doc 65 TOTALNZ = 165 TOTALLOD = 900 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method TOTALZ = 574 doc 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0078 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0076 0.0022 0.0022 0.013 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0065 0.0022 0.0066 0.014 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.026 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0048 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.037 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0082 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.084 0.0022 0.0022 0.034 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.015 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.0022 0.0022 0.0066 0.0083 0.0022 0.035 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0085 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.011 0.0087 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0064 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003



### Turnip green PDP 55.rdf Turnip greens doc BEAD 2000 of 19 PCT/13 PCT TOTALNZ = 29 TOTALLOD = 101 LODRES = 0.002074 doc half the LOD TOTALZ = 556 doc 0.0065 0.035 0.025 6.3 0.034 0.44 0.0063 0.0063 0.025 0.011 0.011 0.011Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 110

0.007 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.0063 0.007 0.015 0.007 0.24 0.0063 0.0063 0.033 0.0063 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011



### turnip etc PDP 51.rdf radish doc 19 TOTALNZ = 165 TOTALLOD = 146 LODRES = 0.001071 doc half the average LOD method TOTALZ = 1328 doc 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0078 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0076 0.0022 0.0022 0.013 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0065 0.0022 0.0066 0.014 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.026 0.005 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0048 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.037 0.0022 0.0022 0.0099 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0046 0.0082 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.084 0.0022 0.0022 0.034 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.015 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.0022 0.0022 0.0066 0.0083 0.0022 0.035 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0085 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.011 0.0087 0.0022 0.0022 0.005 0.0022 0.0064 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003



### Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf Walnut doc 55 PCT adjustedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 111

TOTALNZ= 232 TOTALLOD = 69 LODRES = 0.0005 doc TOTALZ = 246 doc 0.001043 0.00584 0.010832 0.00104 0.0019 0.0011 0.0014 0.001116 0.0133 0.001378 0.0023 0.0058 0.0019 0.0017 0.0016 0.022078 0.00365 0.0069 0.005672 0.001146 0.00148 0.002 0.003581 0.00101 0.001343 0.003194 0.003137 0.001511 0.0014 0.0076 0.001 0.0018 0.00218 0.0036 0.002 0.002048 0.0015 0.00514 0.002 0.001437 0.001131 0.0041 0.0064 0.0108 0.0041 0.006695 0.007489 0.002634 0.0037 0.0071 0.006992 0.002519 0.0103 0.002581 0.0017 0.001816 0.0019 0.0029 0.0033 0.0015 0.001079 0.0034 0.0155 0.001904 0.001143 0.003604 0.0028 0.007168 0.00333 0.0013 0.001552 0.002073 0.004466 0.0035 0.00659 0.0013 0.0019 0.00197 0.001354 0.004317 0.0021 0.004657 0.00543 0.0021 0.004919 0.011711 0.001 0.0036 0.002718 0.009486 0.002 0.00269 0.005 0.0025 0.00687 0.00302 0.0024 0.00147 0.004361 0.006643 0.005338 0.004154 0.014389 0.006322 0.0059 0.008 0.0076 0.0059 0.0077 0.0026 0.001478 0.001065 0.024804 0.006787 0.002606 0.0013 0.00277 0.004791 0.002425 0.009487 0.001334 0.0027 0.001 0.014108 0.0027 0.0023 0.00155 0.001402 0.006159 0.004858 0.0151 0.0036 0.007305 0.008964 0.002639 0.004611 0.002837 0.009427 0.002167 0.002433 0.001966 0.002151 0.001522 0.009372 0.011869 0.005716 0.002388 0.006403 0.002161 0.003205 0.009631 0.005017 0.00492 0.00387 0.0138 0.0082 0.0023 0.0045 0.0478 0.0011 0.0012 0.0011 0.0123 0.0038 0.0072 0.0015 0.0025 0.0055 0.0057 0.0028 0.0014 0.0012 0.0016 0.0089 0.0022 0.0064 0.0011 0.0031 0.0016 0.0021 0.001 0.0027 0.0045 0.0016 0.0015 0.0022 0.0021 0.0018 0.0035 0.0011 0.0017 0.0024 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0073 0.0033 0.0016 0.0034 0.0043 0.0012 0.0015 0.0017 0.0011 0.0234 0.0043 0.0042 0.0013Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 112

0.001334 0.001596 0.001341 0.001014 0.00145 0.0024 0.0018 0.007 0.00677 0.0068 0.0017 0.003027 0.0021 0.0059 0.0077 0.0012 0.0031 0.0037 0.0108 0.0013 0.0023 0.0011 0.0032 0.0021 

### wheat grain PDP 15.rdf Wheat grain doc Doune 2007 says 2 percent but blended so everything at half LOD TOTALNZ = 8 TOTALLOD = 935 LODRES = 0.003 doc cut to half the LOD= 0.006 TOTALZ = 0 0.01 0.01 0.042 0.01 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 113



### Appendix C—DEEM Residue FILE INPUTDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 114

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 DEEM-FCID Acute analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS Residue file name: C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 Analysis Date 10-26-2010 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 Reference dose: aRfD = 0.005 mg/kg bw/day NOEL = 0.5 mg/kg bw/day Comment: Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter #1 Param #2 Param #3 Comment # Code

----- ---- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- 1 6 Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf 2 6 Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf 3 6 Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf 4 6 Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf 5 6 Orange processed PDP 5.rdf 6 6 Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf 7 6 APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf 8 6 APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf 9 6 APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf 10 6 Almond PDP RFD 10.rdf 11 6 Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf 12 6 Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf 13 6 Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf 14 6 Orange juice PDP 14.rdf 15 6 wheat grain PDP 15.rdf 16 6 Cranberry PDP 16.rdf 17 6 Broccoli PDP 17.rdf 18 6 Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf 19 6 KIWI FDA 19.rdf 20 6 Collard PDP 20.rdf 21 6 5B green PDP 21.rdf 22 6 Cabbage FDA 22.rdf 23 6 Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf 24 6 Other citrus PDP 24.rdf 25 6 Lettuce PDP 25.rdf 26 6 Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf 27 6 Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf 28 6 brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf 29 6 Lemon PDP 29.rdf 30 6 Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf 31 6 Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdf 32 6 Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf 33 6 Cherry PDP 33.rdf 34 6 Corn PDP 34.rdf 35 6 Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf 36 6 Strawberry PDP 36.rdf 37 6 Beef PDP 37.rdf 38 6 Pork fat PDP 38.rdf 39 6 Pork meat PDP 39.rdf 40 6 Kale PDP 40.rdf 41 6 Fig tolerance 41.rdf 42 6 Green beans PDP 42.rdf 43 6 canned green beans PDP 43.rdf 44 6 Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf 45 6 Prune PDP 45.rdf 46 6 Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf 47 6 Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf 48 6 Eggs 48 EPA.rdf 49 6 Pear PDP 49.rdf 50 6 Peanut FDA 50.rdf 51 6 Turnip etc PDP 51.rdf 52 6 sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdfDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 115

53 6 Cucumber PDP 53.rdf 54 6 Raisin PDP 54.rdf 55 6 Turnip green PDP 55.rdf 56 6 Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf 57 6 Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf 58 6 Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf 59 6 Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf 60 6 PeasPDP 60.rdf 61 6 Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf 62 6 Sunflower 62.rdf 63 6 Peach PDP 63 import.rdf 64 6 Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf 65 6 Nick's NAQWA2001 RFD.rdf 92 6 Radish PDP 92.rdf 93 6 Plum import PDP 93.rdf 94 6 Grape imports PDP 94.rdf 95 6 Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf 96 6 Frozen Sweet Corn PDP 96.rdf 97 6 Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf 98 6 frozen peas PDP 98.rdf 99 6 Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf

EPA Crop Food Def Res Adj.Factors RDL Pointers and Ratios Code Grp Name (ppm) #1 #2 P#1 Ratio#1 P#2 Ratio#2

-------- ---- ---- ---------- ------ ------ --- ------- --- ------- 14000030 14 Almond 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 14000031 14 Almond-babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 14000040 14 Almond, oil 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 14000041 14 Almond, oil-babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 10 1.0000 11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.010000 1.000 1.000 7 1.0000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.010000 0.150 1.000 7 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.000128 1.200 0.670 Comment: already has PCT in it don't use adjust #2 11000091 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.000128 1.200 0.670 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.010000 0.300 1.000 7 1.0000 11000101 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 0.010000 0.300 1.000 7 1.0000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce-babyfoodDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 116

0.010000 1.000 1.000 9 1.0000 95000190 O Asparagus 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 0.5700 2 0.4300 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 5.000000 1.000 1.000 3 1.0000 95000230 O Banana 0.100000 1.000 1.000 4 1.0000 95000231 O Banana-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 4 1.0000 95000240 O Banana, dried 0.100000 3.900 1.000 4 1.0000 95000241 O Banana, dried-babyfood 0.100000 3.900 1.000 4 1.0000 06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06020310 6B Bean, broad, succulent 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06020330 6B Bean, cowpea, succulent 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 1.000 0.010 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 1.000 0.010 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.000500 99.000 0.010 06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 1.000 0.010 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.000500 1.000 0.010 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.000500 1.000 0.010 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.000500 1.000 0.010 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 99.000 0.010 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.000500 99.000 0.010 06020370 6B Bean, lima, succulent 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 117

221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.050000 1.000 1.000 98 1.0000 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 98 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 60 1.0000 06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 1.000 0.010 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.000500 1.000 0.010 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.000500 1.000 0.010 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.000500 99.000 0.010 06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06010430 6A Bean, snap, succulent 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.030 59 1.0000 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.030 59 1.0000 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.030 43 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.030 43 1.0000 06010431 6A Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.030 42 1.0000 21000440 M Beef, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000441 M Beef, meat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000450 M Beef, meat, dried 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000460 M Beef, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000461 M Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000470 M Beef, fat 0.300000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000471 M Beef,fat-babyfoodDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 118

0.300000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000480 M Beef, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000490 M Beef, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 21000491 M Beef, liver-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 01010520 1A Beet, sugar 0.000681 0.100 1.000 01010521 1A Beet, sugar-babyfood 0.000681 0.100 1.000 01010530 1A Beet, sugar, molasses 0.000681 1.000 1.000 01010531 1A Beet, sugar, molasses-babyfood 0.000681 1.000 1.000 05010610 5A Broccoli 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 05010611 5A Broccoli-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 05010620 5A Broccoli, Chinese 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 05020630 5B Broccoli raab 1.000000 1.000 1.000 17 1.0000 05010640 5A Brussels sprouts 1.000000 1.000 1.000 28 1.0000 05010690 5A Cabbage 1.000000 1.000 1.000 22 1.0000 05020700 5B Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 05010710 5A Cabbage, Chinese, napa 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 05010720 5A Cabbage, Chinese, mustard 1.000000 1.000 1.000 23 1.0000 05010830 5A Cauliflower 1.000000 1.000 1.000 27 1.0000 12000900 12 Cherry 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 12000901 12 Cherry-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 33 1.0000 12000910 12 Cherry, juice 1.000000 0.300 1.000 33 1.0000 12000911 12 Cherry, juice-babyfood 1.000000 0.300 1.000 34 1.0000 40000930 P Chicken, meat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 40000931 P Chicken, meat-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 40000940 P Chicken, liver 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 40000950 P Chicken, meat byproductsDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 119

0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 40000951 P Chicken, meat byproducts-babyfoo 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 40000960 P Chicken, fat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 40000961 P Chicken, fat-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 40000970 P Chicken, skin 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 40000971 P Chicken, skin-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 06030980 6C Chickpea, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030981 6C Chickpea, seed-babyfood 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06030990 6C Chickpea, flour 0.000500 1.000 0.010 10001060 10 Citrus citron 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 10001070 10 Citrus hybrids 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 10001080 10 Citrus, oil 2.000000 1.000 1.000 Comment: adjusted point on PCt 05021170 5B Collards 1.000000 1.000 1.000 20 1.0000 15001200 15 Corn, field, flour 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001201 15 Corn, field, flour-babyfood 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001210 15 Corn, field, meal 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001211 15 Corn, field, meal-babyfood 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001220 15 Corn, field, bran 0.000440 1.000 1.000 15001230 15 Corn, field, starch 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001231 15 Corn, field, starch-babyfood 0.000440 0.220 1.000 15001240 15 Corn, field, syrup 0.000440 0.050 1.000 15001241 15 Corn, field, syrup-babyfood 0.000440 0.050 1.000 15001250 15 Corn, field, oil 0.000440 4.500 1.000 15001251 15 Corn, field, oil-babyfood 0.000440 4.500 1.000 15001270 15 Corn, sweet 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.050000 1.000 1.000 96 1.0000 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 96 1.0000Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 120

240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 1.000 97 1.0000 15001271 15 Corn, sweet-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.180 97 1.0000 95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 0.002250 1.000 0.050 95001281 O Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 0.002250 1.000 0.050 95001300 O Cranberry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 95001301 O Cranberry-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 95001310 O Cranberry, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 16 1.0000 95001320 O Cranberry, juice 1.000000 0.300 1.000 16 1.0000 95001321 O Cranberry, juice-babyfood 1.000000 0.300 1.000 16 1.0000 09021350 9B Cucumber 0.050000 1.000 1.000 53 1.0000 70001450 P Egg, whole 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 70001451 P Egg, whole-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 70001460 P Egg, white 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 70001461 P Egg, white (solids)-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 70001470 P Egg, yolk 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 70001471 P Egg, yolk-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 48 1.0000 95001530 O Fig 0.010000 1.000 1.000 41 1.0000 95001540 O Fig, dried 0.010000 1.000 1.000 41 1.0000 14001550 14 Filbert 0.200000 1.000 1.000 11 1.0000 14001560 14 Filbert, oil 0.200000 1.000 1.000 11 1.0000 23001690 M Goat, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 23001700 M Goat, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 23001710 M Goat, fat 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 23001720 M Goat, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 23001730 M Goat, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 95001750 O Grape 0.010000 1.000 0.490 56 0.4600 94 0.5400 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.002100 1.000 0.490 95001761 O Grape, juice-babyfood 0.002100 1.000 0.490 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.010000 1.000 0.030 54 1.0000 10001800 10 Grapefruit 1.000000 1.000 1.000 26 1.0000 10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 1.000000 0.300 1.000 26 1.0000 06031820 6C Guar, seedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 121

0.000500 1.000 0.010 06031821 6C Guar, seed-babyfood 0.000500 1.000 0.010 24001890 M Horse, meat 0.250000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 05021940 5B Kale 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 95001950 O Kiwifruit 2.000000 0.150 1.000 19 1.0000 05011960 5A Kohlrabi 1.000000 1.000 1.000 21 1.0000 10001970 10 Kumquat 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 10001990 10 Lemon 1.000000 1.000 1.000 29 1.0000 10002000 10 Lemon, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 10002001 10 Lemon, juice-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 10002010 10 Lemon, peel 1.000000 15.000 1.000 29 1.0000 06032030 6C Lentil, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 04012040 4A Lettuce, head 1.000000 1.000 1.000 25 1.0000 04012050 4A Lettuce, leaf 1.000000 1.000 1.000 25 1.0000 10002060 10 Lime 1.000000 1.000 1.000 29 1.0000 10002070 10 Lime, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 10002071 10 Lime, juice-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 30 1.0000 05022290 5B Mustard greens 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 12002300 12 Nectarine 0.050000 1.000 0.170 61 0.9100 64 0.0900 03002370 3 Onion, dry bulb 0.500000 1.000 1.000 35 1.0000 03002371 3 Onion, dry bulb-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 35 1.0000 03002380 3 Onion, dry bulb, dried 0.002850 9.000 1.000 03002381 3 Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood 0.002850 9.000 1.000 10002400 10 Orange 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 6 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 6 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 1.000000 1.000 1.000 5 1.0000 10002410 10 Orange, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 14 1.0000 10002411 10 Orange, juice-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 14 1.0000 10002420 10 Orange, peel 1.000000 15.000 1.000 5 1.0000 06022550 6B Pea, succulent 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 122

211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.010 98 1.0000 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 98 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 06022551 6B Pea, succulent-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 06032560 6C Pea, dry 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06032561 6C Pea, dry-babyfood 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06012570 6A Pea, edible podded, succulent 0.050000 1.000 0.030 60 1.0000 06032580 6C Pea, pigeon, seed 0.000500 1.000 0.010 06022590 6B Pea, pigeon, succulent 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.010 60 1.0000 12002600 12 Peach 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 0.380 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.380 58 1.0000 12002601 12 Peach-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 58 1.0000 12002610 12 Peach, dried 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.800 1.000 58 0.9100 63 0.0900 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 12002611 12 Peach, dried-babyfood 0.050000 1.800 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 12002620 12 Peach, juice 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; BakedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 123

0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 12002621 12 Peach, juice-babyfood 0.050000 0.300 1.000 57 0.9100 63 0.0900 95002630 O Peanut 0.200000 1.000 1.000 50 1.0000 95002640 O Peanut, butter 0.000810 1.000 1.000 Comment: adjusted for blend at 6 PCT 95002650 O Peanut, oil 0.200000 2.000 1.000 50 1.0000 11002660 11 Pear 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 11002661 11 Pear-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.050000 0.940 1.000 49 1.0000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.050000 0.300 1.000 49 1.0000 11002681 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 49 1.0000 14002690 14 Pecan 0.200000 1.000 1.000 12 1.0000 08002700 8 Pepper, bell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002701 8 Pepper, bell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002710 8 Pepper, bell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002711 8 Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002720 8 Pepper, nonbell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002721 8 Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 08002730 8 Pepper, nonbell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 32 1.0000 95002750 O Peppermint 0.200000 1.000 0.250 95002760 O Peppermint, oil 2.000000 1.000 0.250 12002850 12 Plum 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 12002851 12 Plum-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 12002860 12 Plum, prune, fresh 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 12002861 12 Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 12002870 12 Plum, prune, dried 0.050000 1.000 0.060 45 1.0000 12002871 12 Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 0.060 45 1.0000 12002880 12 Plum, prune, juice 0.050000 1.400 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 12002881 12 Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 0.050000 1.400 0.060 44 0.9200 93 0.0800 25002900 M Pork, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 25002901 M Pork, meat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 25002910 M Pork, skin 0.050000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 25002920 M Pork, meat byproductsDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 124

0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 25002921 M Pork, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 25002930 M Pork, fat 0.200000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 25002931 M Pork, fat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 38 1.0000 25002940 M Pork, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 25002950 M Pork, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 39 1.0000 60003010 P Poultry, other, meat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 60003020 P Poultry, other, liver 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 60003030 P Poultry, other, meat byproducts 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 60003040 P Poultry, other, fat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 60003050 P Poultry, other, skin 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 10003070 10 Pummelo 1.000000 1.000 1.000 26 1.0000 09023080 9B Pumpkin 0.050000 1.000 1.000 95 1.0000 01013140 1AB Radish, roots 2.000000 1.000 0.190 92 1.0000 01013160 1AB Radish, Oriental, roots 0.050000 1.000 0.190 92 1.0000 05023180 5B Rape greens 1.000000 1.000 1.000 40 1.0000 01013270 1AB Rutabaga 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.500000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.150 0.190 51 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.500000 0.150 0.190 51 1.0000 26003390 M Sheep, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003391 M Sheep, meat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003400 M Sheep, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003410 M Sheep, fat 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003411 M Sheep, fat-babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003420 M Sheep, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 26003430 M Sheep, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 37 1.0000 15003440 15 Sorghum, grain 0.000110 1.000 1.000 15003450 15 Sorghum, syrup 0.000110 0.050 1.000 06003470 6 Soybean, seed 0.002240 1.000 1.000 06003480 6 Soybean, flour 0.002240 1.000 1.000 06003481 6 Soybean, flour-babyfood 0.002240 1.000 1.000 06003490 6 Soybean, soy milkDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 125

0.002240 1.000 1.000 06003491 6 Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or in 0.002240 1.000 1.000 06003500 6 Soybean, oil 0.002240 0.140 1.000 06003501 6 Soybean, oil-babyfood 0.002240 0.140 1.000 95003520 O Spearmint 0.200000 1.000 0.250 95003530 O Spearmint, oil 2.000000 1.000 0.270 95003590 O Strawberry 0.200000 1.000 1.000 36 1.0000 95003591 O Strawberry-babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 36 1.0000 95003600 O Strawberry, juice 0.200000 0.300 1.000 36 1.0000 95003601 O Strawberry, juice-babyfood 0.200000 0.300 1.000 36 1.0000 20003640 20 Sunflower, seed 0.100000 1.000 0.030 62 1.0000 20003650 20 Sunflower, oil 0.004140 1.000 0.030 20003651 20 Sunflower, oil-babyfood 0.004140 1.000 0.030 01033660 1CD Sweet potato 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 245-Cooked; Canned; Boiled/baked 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 01033661 1CD Sweet potato-babyfood 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.050000 1.000 0.190 52 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.050000 0.150 0.190 52 1.0000 10003690 10 Tangerine 1.000000 1.000 1.000 24 1.0000 10003700 10 Tangerine, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 31 1.0000 50003820 P Turkey, meat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003821 P Turkey, meat-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003830 P Turkey, liver 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003831 P Turkey, liver-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003840 P Turkey, meat byproducts 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003841 P Turkey, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 46 1.0000 50003850 P Turkey, fat 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 50003851 P Turkey, fat-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 126

50003860 P Turkey, skin 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 50003861 P Turkey, skin-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 47 1.0000 01013880 1AB Turnip, roots 1.000000 1.000 0.190 51 1.0000 05023890 5B Turnip, greens 0.300000 1.000 1.000 55 1.0000 14003910 14 Walnut 0.200000 1.000 1.000 13 1.0000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.000008 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.000008 1.000 1.000 Comment: 65 was RDF file 15004010 15 Wheat, grain 0.500000 1.000 1.000 15 1.0000 15004011 15 Wheat, grain-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 15 1.0000 15004020 15 Wheat, flour 110-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 120-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 130-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 150-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 210-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 211-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 212-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 213-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 214-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 215-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 220-Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 221-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 222-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 223-Cooked; Frozen; Fried 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 224-Cooked; Frozen; Fried/baked 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 230-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 231-Cooked; Dried; Baked 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 232-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 233-Cooked; Dried; Fried 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 240-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 242-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 0.500000 0.026 1.000 15 1.0000 250-Cooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 251-Cooked; Cured etc; BakedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 127

0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 252-Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 253-Cooked; Cured etc; Fried 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 15004021 15 Wheat, flour-babyfood 0.500000 0.145 1.000 15 1.0000 15004030 15 Wheat, germ 0.500000 2.700 1.000 15 1.0000 15004040 15 Wheat, bran 0.500000 3.000 1.000 15 1.0000Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 128



### Appendix D—Summary of Re sidue Distribution FilesDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 129

Summary of Residue Distribution Files (RDF) listed in C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98

RDF File N residues N residues N LODs LOD N Zeros # Name w freq's w/o freq's Value

---- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- ------- 1 Asparagus PDP import Rdf 1.rdf 0 17 209 0.005642 287 2 Asparagus PDP dom Rdf 2.rdf 0 4 87 0.002544 116 3 Asparagus canned PDP RDF 3.rdf 0 6 150 0.002 1198 4 Banana PDP Rdf 4.rdf 0 3 205 0.00186 1278 5 Orange processed PDP 5.rdf 0 34 99 0.002 1350 6 Orange fresh PDP 6.rdf 0 34 633 0.002 816 7 APPLES PDP RFD 7.rdf 0 17 991 0.001006 496 8 APPLE juice PDP RFD 8.rdf 0 0 247 0.003136 121 9 APPLE sauce PDP RFD 9.rdf 0 0 478 0.0001024 236 10 Almond PDP RFD 10.rdf 0 232 3 0.0005 312 11 Filbert PDP RFD 11.rdf 0 232 0 0.0005 928 12 Pecan PDP RFD 12.rdf 0 232 0 0.0005 431 13 Walnut PDP RFD 13.rdf 0 232 69 0.0005 246 14 Orange juice PDP 14.rdf 0 4 130 0.002 1353 15 wheat grain PDP 15.rdf 0 8 935 0.003 0 16 Cranberry PDP 16.rdf 0 71 150 0.002347 95 17 Broccoli PDP 17.rdf 0 108 438 0.0006 929 18 Grapefruit juice PDP.rdf 0 6 233 0.002 1252 19 KIWI FDA 19.rdf 0 1000 2971 0.0015 3972 20 Collard PDP 20.rdf 0 22 66 0.002074 591 21 5B green PDP 21.rdf 0 14 0 0.002155 1386 22 Cabbage FDA 22.rdf 0 3 53 0.0025 199 23 Chinese Cabbage FDA 23.rdf 0 3 10 0.0025 242 24 Other citrus PDP 24.rdf 0 34 114 0.002 1338 25 Lettuce PDP 25.rdf 0 42 0 0.001007 1444 26 Grapefruit PDP 26.rdf 0 24 233 0.000863 1143 27 Cauliflower PDP 27.rdf 0 8 678 0.0009 806 28 brussels Sprout PDP 28.rdf 0 266 1077 0.0006 133 29 Lemon PDP 29.rdf 0 34 396 0.002 1053 30 Lemon juice PDP 30.rdf 0 4 427 0.002 1056 31 Other Citrus juice PDP 31.rdfDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 130

0 4 145 0.002 1338 32 Pepper PDP RFD 32.rdf 0 232 28 0.0006 1299 33 Cherry PDP 33.rdf 0 0 222 0.001365 197 34 Corn PDP 34.rdf 0 195 0 0.0005 455 35 Onion PDP RFD 35.rdf 0 0 57 0.005 43 36 Strawberry PDP 36.rdf 0 66 663 0.00128 1480 37 Beef PDP 37.rdf 0 0 20 0.0014 80 38 Pork fat PDP 38.rdf 0 1 39 0.00075 160 39 Pork meat PDP 39.rdf 0 0 20 0.000375 80 40 Kale PDP 40.rdf 0 36 4 0.001928 762 41 Fig tolerance 41.rdf 0 1 0 0.0025 99 42 Green beans PDP 42.rdf 0 14 90 0.001714 1376 43 canned green beans PDP 43.rdf 0 0 65 0.002355 863 44 Plum domestic PDP 44.rdf 0 20 39 0.002809 600 45 Prune PDP 45.rdf 0 0 34 0.002714 343 46 Poultry meat PDP 46.rdf 0 0 10 0.00075 90 47 Poultry Fat 47 EPA.rdf 0 10 0 0 90 48 Eggs 48 EPA.rdf 0 10 0 0 90 49 Pear PDP 49.rdf 0 33 338 0.001686 1112 50 Peanut FDA 50.rdf 0 6 94 0.0025 0 51 Turnip etc PDP 51.rdf 0 165 146 0.001071 1328 52 sweet potatoe PDP 52.rdf 0 165 900 0.001071 574 53 Cucumber PDP 53.rdf 0 25 53 0.002 1218 54 Raisin PDP 54.rdf 0 5 40 0.002581 699 55 Turnip green PDP 55.rdf 0 29 101 0.002074 556 56 Grape domestic PDP 56.rdf 0 15 31 0.001932 715 57 Peach domestic PDP 57.rdf 0 23 274 0.004217 552 58 Canned Peach PDP 58.rdf 0 0 35 0.005 65 59 Frozen Green beans PDP 59.rdf 0 1 38 0.002285 516 60 PeasPDP 60.rdf 0 14 60 0.001714 1406 61 Nectarine domestic PDP 61.rdf 0 9 233 0.0025 564 62 Sunflower 62.rdf 0 9 0 0 91 63 Peach PDP 63 import.rdf 0 194 171 0.00186 41 64 Nectarine import PDP 64.rdf 0 147 171 0.0025 106 92 Radish PDP 92.rdf 0 165 146 0.001071 1328 93 Plum import PDP 93.rdf 0 110 17 0.003016 297 94 Grape imports PDP 94.rdf 0 165 547 0.001793 0 95 Pumpkin PDP 95.rdf 0 25 66 0.002 1205 96 Frozen Sweet Corn PDP 96.rdf 0 0 104 0.002347 476Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 131

97 Sweet Corn PDP 97.rdf 0 0 27 0.007217 125 98 frozen peas PDP 98.rdf 0 0 65 0.002014 1228 99 Kidney Bean Canned PDP 99.rdf 0 0 2 0.00871 98Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 132



### Appendix E—DEEM Analysis FILE OUTPUTDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 133

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS (1994-98 data) Residue file: DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 Adjustment factor #2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 10-28-2010/16:43:49 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 NOEL (Acute) = 0.500000 mg/kg body-wt/day Acute Pop Adjusted Dose (aPAD) varies with population; see individual reports MC iterations = 5000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 24 Run Comment: "Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from http://www.epa.gov/o ppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf"

===============================================================================

Summary calculations--per capita:

--- 95th Percentile---- --- 99th Percentile---- ---99.9th Percentile---- Exposure % aPAD MOE Exposure % aPAD MOE Exposure % aPAD MOE

---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- U.S. Population: 0.000020 0.41 24598 0.000051 1.02 9800 0.000169 3.39 2952 All infants: 0.000043 8.54 11705 0.000086 17.11 5845 0.000211 42.14 2373 Nursing infants (<1 yr old): 0.000026 5.11 19566 0.000067 13.49 7410 0.000143 28.69 3486 Non-nursing infants (<1 yr old): 0.000048 9.50 10521 0.000093 18.53 5397 0.000212 42.44 2356 Children 1-6 yrs: 0.000051 10.10 9896 0.000103 20.55 4865 0.000253 50.63 1975 Children 7-12 yrs: 0.000025 4.98 20097 0.000051 10.13 9871 0.000157 31.41 3183 Females 13+ (preg/not nursing): 0.000016 3.15 31737 0.000037 7.45 13429 0.000185 36.96 2705 Females 13+ (nursing): 0.000018 3.57 28006 0.000042 8.49 11775 0.000161 32.10 3115 Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing): 0.000014 2.82 35475 0.000033 6.56 15234 0.000100 19.93 5016 Females 20+ (not preg or nursing): 0.000014 2.81 35638 0.000033 6.61 15137 0.000150 29.91 3343 Females 13-50 yrs: 0.000014 2.82 35484 0.000033 6.59 15172 0.000135 26.94 3711 Males 13-19 yrs: 0.000015 0.30 32963 0.000037 0.73 13691 0.000130 2.61 3834Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 134

Cheryl Cleveland Ver. 2.16 DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for CHLORPYRIFOS (1994-98 data) Residue file: DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 Adjustment factor #2 NOT used. Analysis Date: 10-28-2010/16:43:49 Residue file dated: 06-14-2010/10:34:53/118 NOEL (Acute) = 0.500000 mg/kg body-wt/day Acute Pop Adjusted Dose (aPAD) varies with population; see individual reports MC iterations = 5000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 24 Run Comment: "Vol. 72, No 152 August 8, 2007 and RFD from http://www.epa.gov/o ppsrrd1/REDs/chlorpyrifos_ired.pdf"

===============================================================================

Summary calculations (per capita):

--- 95th Percentile---- --- 99th Percentile---- ---99.9th Percentile---- Exposure aPAD MOE Exposure aPAD MOE Exposure aPAD MOE

---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- Males 20+ yrs: 0.000015 0.29 34386 0.000035 0.70 14331 0.000154 3.08 3247 Seniors 55+: 0.000015 0.29 34262 0.000034 0.68 14658 0.000166 3.31 3017 **Children 1-2 yrs: 0.000063 12.57 7955 0.000126 25.19 3969 0.000273 54.62 1830**  Children 3-5 yrs: 0.000046 9.28 10776 0.000093 18.65 5362 0.000225 44.95 2224 Children 6-12 yrs: 0.000026 5.23 19119 0.000053 10.67 9371 0.000159 31.71 3153 Youth 13-19 yrs: 0.000015 2.91 34339 0.000035 7.01 14265 0.000115 23.04 4339 Adults 20-49 yrs: 0.000014 0.29 34926 0.000034 0.68 14686 0.000146 2.92 3426 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000014 0.29 34755 0.000034 0.68 14717 0.000166 3.31 3018 Females 13-49 yrs: 0.000014 2.82 35422 0.000033 6.59 15174 0.000134 26.84 3726Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 135



### Appendix F—Key Output from DEEM Critical Commodity Analysis FileDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 136

Note on CEC was only be generated for the first 932 iterations in the MCA Output was truncated at 0.1% contributions

Cheryl Cleveland DEEM-FCID Acute Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis (Ver 2.16) CSFII 1994-98 Residue file = C:\DEEM residue files - ata\CPF rebuild 2010\DAS acute PDP water for June 2010 pulbication runs.r98 Date and time of analysis: 10-28-2010 20:19:07 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. Adjustment factor #2 not used. Minimum exposure contribution = 1% Monte Carlo Iterations = 1000 Seed = 24 CEC records generated for first 972 iterations. Exposures divided by body weight

Subpopulations: 1 Children 1-2 yrs

================================================================================ Children 1-2 yrs Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure (mg/day) = 0.000126 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure (mg/day) = 0.275895 Number of actual records in this interval: 36458

Critical foods with foodforms for this population (as derived from these records): N=number of appearances in all records (including duplicates) %=percent of total exposure for all records (including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name

-------- --- ----- ------- ------------- 95001760 110 11888 13.64% Grape, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5021170 212 360 12.48% Collards-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 95001950 110 370 11.32% Kiwifruit-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001750 110 5406 6.50% Grape-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 12002600 110 2180 3.63% Peach-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5021170 242 61 2.85% Collards-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 10002410 110 2419 2.58% Orange, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001320 110 842 2.45% Cranberry, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5023890 212 66 2.17% Turnip, greens-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 11002681 240 982 2.16% Pear, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6003490 210 1655 2.08% Soybean, soy milk-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 210 866 2.03% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 110 850 1.99% Pepper, bell-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5010690 212 185 1.89% Cabbage-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 15001270 242 1890 1.69% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 10002410 120 1296 1.67% Orange, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 95001320 240 1134 1.51% Cranberry, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 12002600 240 2263 1.40% Peach-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 11000100 110 4827 1.39% Apple, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11002660 110 973 1.31% Pear-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001760 120 1010 1.26% Grape, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 5010690 110 614 1.23% Cabbage-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 6003490 230 998 1.17% Soybean, soy milk-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 11000070 110 4708 1.08% Apple, fruit with peel-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001760 240 5859 0.93% Grape, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 11002660 240 1064 0.83% Pear-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15001270 212 1064 0.77% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 5023890 242 52 0.66% Turnip, greens-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 8002700 213 354 0.57% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 95002630 211 936 0.56% Peanut-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; BakedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 137

10002400 110 1231 0.52% Orange-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 6022550 242 406 0.49% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 15004010 211 7110 0.46% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 5021940 212 61 0.44% Kale-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 9021350 110 298 0.41% Cucumber-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 240 141 0.40% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 20003640 211 170 0.39% Sunflower, seed-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 95000230 110 1927 0.38% Banana-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11002661 240 248 0.38% Pear-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 12002850 110 184 0.38% Plum-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 211 313 0.38% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 6010430 212 234 0.37% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 5010610 212 842 0.36% Broccoli-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 95001300 240 210 0.35% Cranberry-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 215 253 0.34% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 12002880 110 101 0.31% Plum, prune, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 9021350 240 195 0.29% Cucumber-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 5010610 222 270 0.29% Broccoli-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 15001270 222 490 0.27% Corn, sweet-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 8002720 212 163 0.26% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 95003590 110 889 0.25% Strawberry-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 12002300 110 144 0.21% Nectarine-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95000190 212 63 0.18% Asparagus-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 1033660 211 120 0.18% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 4012040 110 170 0.16% Lettuce, head-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11000101 240 522 0.16% Apple, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 11000100 240 1643 0.15% Apple, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15004020 211 5055 0.13% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 12002600 211 66 0.13% Peach-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 6010431 240 66 0.12% Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6022551 240 105 0.12% Pea, succulent-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15004040 230 856 0.11% Wheat, bran-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 1033660 212 65 0.11% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 12002600 120 55 0.10% Peach-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 15004010 230 896 0.10% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 3002370 210 1553 0.10% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 212 72 0.09% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 3002370 212 1677 0.09% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 12002610 130 28 0.09% Peach, dried-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 8002720 215 93 0.08% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 95001761 240 364 0.08% Grape, juice-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6020330 212 30 0.07% Bean, cowpea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 15004030 230 701 0.07% Wheat, germ-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 12002601 240 157 0.07% Peach-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6020370 242 41 0.07% Bean, lima, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 8002720 210 89 0.06% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001780 130 228 0.06% Grape, raisin-Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 21000440 210 1286 0.06% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 15004010 231 1000 0.06% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Baked 3002380 210 899 0.06% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 6022550 212 62 0.06% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 10002410 240 448 0.06% Orange, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15004020 214 1005 0.06% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 12002620 110 68 0.05% Peach, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 20003640 210 102 0.05% Sunflower, seed-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 21000440 211 729 0.05% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 10003690 110 50 0.05% Tangerine-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 3002380 212 630 0.05% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 5010610 220 97 0.05% Broccoli-Cooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 12002851 240 28 0.04% Plum-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 8002700 221 32 0.04% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Frozen; Baked 15004020 231 1743 0.04% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Dried; BakedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 138

11000100 120 100 0.04% Apple, juice-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 9023080 211 13 0.04% Pumpkin-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 8002700 222 29 0.04% Pepper, bell-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 5022290 242 13 0.04% Mustard greens-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 95001750 210 452 0.04% Grape-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 3002370 213 481 0.04% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 95001300 211 35 0.04% Cranberry-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 3002381 240 391 0.03% Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 95002630 210 226 0.03% Peanut-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 21000440 212 376 0.03% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 5010611 240 20 0.03% Broccoli-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 1033660 210 42 0.03% Sweet potato-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95001750 240 395 0.03% Grape-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6020370 212 20 0.03% Bean, lima, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 95002630 231 947 0.03% Peanut-Cooked; Dried; Baked 15004010 232 95 0.03% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 6012570 210 30 0.03% Pea, edible podded, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 8002730 210 151 0.02% Pepper, nonbell, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5010640 222 14 0.02% Brussels sprouts-Cooked; Frozen; Boiled 15004020 210 829 0.02% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11002660 210 218 0.02% Pear-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11002680 240 103 0.02% Pear, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 5021940 242 10 0.02% Kale-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 3002370 211 556 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 21000440 213 447 0.02% Beef, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 8002730 212 46 0.02% Pepper, nonbell, dried-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 9021350 150 11 0.02% Cucumber-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 3002370 230 248 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 8002720 110 11 0.02% Pepper, nonbell-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 3002370 110 591 0.02% Onion, dry bulb-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 6010430 242 168 0.02% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 5010610 210 30 0.02% Broccoli-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 10002000 110 340 0.01% Lemon, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5010690 150 9 0.01% Cabbage-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 15004030 232 715 0.01% Wheat, germ-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 3002370 215 267 0.01% Onion, dry bulb-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 12002860 232 5 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 6010430 215 9 0.01% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled/baked 1013880 212 6 0.01% Turnip, roots-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 6010430 210 7 0.01% Bean, snap, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 40000930 210 420 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 15004040 214 152 0.01% Wheat, bran-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried/baked 12002620 240 14 0.01% Peach, juice-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6022550 210 11 0.01% Pea, succulent-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 15004020 240 511 0.01% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15004020 212 487 0.01% Wheat, flour-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Boiled 95000231 240 88 0.01% Banana-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 3002380 242 143 0.01% Onion, dry bulb, dried-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 95001760 210 463 0.01% Grape, juice-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 95000190 242 11 0.01% Asparagus-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 5010610 110 84 0.01% Broccoli-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 11002680 110 10 0.01% Pear, juice-Uncooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 5010690 213 8 0.01% Cabbage-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 95000241 230 22 0.01% Banana, dried-babyfood-Cooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/S 95002640 210 386 0.01% Peanut, butter-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 1013160 210 9 0.01% Radish, Oriental, roots-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 40000930 211 213 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Baked 95003590 120 22 0.01% Strawberry-Uncooked; Frozen; Cook Meth N/S 5010690 255 5 0.01% Cabbage-Cooked; Cured etc; Boiled/bakedDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 139

95003590 240 42 0.01% Strawberry-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 15004010 213 53 0.01% Wheat, grain-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried 12002600 210 7 0.01% Peach-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 21000440 240 175 0.01% Beef, meat-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 6020330 242 5 0.01% Bean, cowpea, succulent-Cooked; Canned; Boiled 8002720 240 23 0.01% Pepper, nonbell-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 12002861 240 6 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood-Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/S 8002720 150 5 0.01% Pepper, nonbell-Uncooked; Cured etc; Cook Meth N/S 21000470 210 233 0.01% Beef, fat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Cook Meth N/S 6030420 232 230 0.01% Bean, pinto, seed-Cooked; Dried; Boiled 15001250 900 185 0.01% Corn, field, oil-Refined; FF N/A; Cook Meth N/S 40000930 213 124 0.01% Chicken, meat-Cooked; Fresh or N/S; Fried

Critical foods (without foodforms) for this population (as derived from these records): N=number of appearances in all records (including duplicates) %=percent of total exposure for all records (including duplicates)

Food N Percent Food Name

-------- ----- ------- ------------- 95001760 19220 15.84% Grape, juice 5021170 421 15.33% Collards 95001950 370 11.32% Kiwifruit 95001750 6253 6.57% Grape 8002700 2914 5.88% Pepper, bell 12002600 4571 5.27% Peach 10002410 4169 4.31% Orange, juice 95001320 1991 3.96% Cranberry, juice 6003490 2656 3.25% Soybean, soy milk 5010690 821 3.15% Cabbage 5023890 118 2.83% Turnip, greens 15001270 3495 2.73% Corn, sweet 11002681 982 2.16% Pear, juice-babyfood 11002660 2255 2.16% Pear 11000100 6571 1.58% Apple, juice 11000070 4712 1.08% Apple, fruit with peel 5010610 1371 0.73% Broccoli 9021350 504 0.72% Cucumber 15004010 9314 0.66% Wheat, grain 95002630 2111 0.62% Peanut 6022550 530 0.56% Pea, succulent 10002400 1231 0.52% Orange 5021940 71 0.46% Kale 20003640 278 0.44% Sunflower, seed 8002720 406 0.44% Pepper, nonbell 6010430 484 0.41% Bean, snap, succulent 95001300 245 0.39% Cranberry 95000230 1940 0.38% Banana 12002850 184 0.38% Plum 11002661 248 0.38% Pear-babyfood 1033660 252 0.32% Sweet potato 12002880 101 0.31% Plum, prune, juice 3002370 5496 0.30% Onion, dry bulb 95003590 954 0.27% Strawberry 15004020 9909 0.27% Wheat, flour 12002300 144 0.21% Nectarine 95000190 74 0.19% Asparagus 21000440 3051 0.17% Beef, meat 4012040 177 0.16% Lettuce, head 11000101 522 0.16% Apple, juice-babyfood 15004040 1027 0.12% Wheat, bran 6022551 105 0.12% Pea, succulent-babyfood 3002380 1948 0.12% Onion, dry bulb, dried 6010431 66 0.12% Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood 6020370 65 0.10% Bean, lima, succulentDow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 101760 Page 140

12002610 28 0.09% Peach, dried 6020330 38 0.08% Bean, cowpea, succulent 15004030 1542 0.08% Wheat, germ 95001761 364 0.08% Grape, juice-babyfood 12002601 157 0.07% Peach-babyfood 12002620 82 0.06% Peach, juice 95001780 285 0.06% Grape, raisin 10003690 50 0.05% Tangerine 8002730 269 0.04% Pepper, nonbell, dried 5022290 13 0.04% Mustard greens 12002851 28 0.04% Plum-babyfood 9023080 16 0.04% Pumpkin 40000930 906 0.03% Chicken, meat 3002381 391 0.03% Onion, dry bulb, dried-babyfood 11002680 113 0.03% Pear, juice 6012570 42 0.03% Pea, edible podded, succulent 5010611 20 0.03% Broccoli-babyfood 5010640 17 0.02% Brussels sprouts 12002860 5 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh 12002861 6 0.01% Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 21000470 404 0.01% Beef, fat 6030420 320 0.01% Bean, pinto, seed 95000231 88 0.01% Banana-babyfood 95002640 395 0.01% Peanut, butter 95000241 22 0.01% Banana, dried-babyfood 1013880 6 0.01% Turnip, roots 1013160 9 0.01% Radish, Oriental, roots 15001250 185 0.01% Corn, field, oil 10002000 391 0.01% Lemon, juice

Number of printed records = 28178 Number of records represented = 36458 (nf = number of foods/ff reported for this daily exposure amount (exceeding minimum contribution) (nx = number of times this exposure amount was computed for the same person on the same day.)