alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Mintz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Tofutti Brands Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

March 21, 2006

/s/David Mintz*
--------------
David Mintz
Chief Executive Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### Billy SCELLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27361.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 19, 1955.

*555No attorney on appeal.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is passing a forged instrument; the punishment, 5 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or hills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summer Infant, Inc.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors:



|March 27, 2008 |  | /s/JASON MACARIJason Macari Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Kass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tofutti Brands Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2006

/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.1   IDI Global, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDI Global, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Weatherly, a consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   1. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 14, 2007  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith Chief Executive Officer     Date: August 14, 2007  /s/ Steven D. Weatherly Steven D. Weatherly Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.4


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology
Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I David Ryon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ DAVID RYON
----------------
David Ryon
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002





<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summer Infant, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jason Macari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 22, 2011

/s/ JASON MACARI Jason Macari Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL ADAMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, J. Beard, Secretary, in 

his/her individual and official capacity; et 

al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-56224 

D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01067-SJO-PJW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Paul Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following an order

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-56224 

revoking his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1118 n.6 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district court properly revoked Adams’s IFP status because at the time 

Adams filed the complaint, he had filed three actions that qualified as “strikes,” 

and he did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of serious 

physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 

Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing the 

imminent danger exception to § 1915(g)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Adams’s contention that he is 

entitled to default judgment. 

We reject as without merit Adams’s contentions concerning fraud, leave to 

amend, and judicial bias.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 of Aqua America, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David P. Smeltzer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

 

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section 78o(d)); and  |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

| ﻿                                                   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ David P. Smeltzer                                      |   |
| David P. Smeltzer                                     |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |   |
| August 3, 2018                                        |   |

﻿

----
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (Deep Down) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Eugene L.
Butler, Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep
      Down.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:     
/s/ EUGENE L.
BUTLER


Eugene L.
Butler


Chief
Financial Officer


November
14, 2008
#### Ex parte A. B. MONEYHUN. v. STATE.

No. 27330.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. *19, 1955.*

Theo. Ash, Abilene, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Taylor County remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff.

After having served 41 days on judgments in three cases totalling 120 days, appellant, through his attorney, approached the County Judge of Taylor County, and requested his release. The County Judge ordered appellant’s release because of his health and upon the condition that appellant would leave Taylor County and never return.

At the time of his release appellant was informed by his attorney that his release was conditioned upon his leaving Taylor County, and he did leave.

Sometime later and after the expiration of the 120-day period, the County Judge learned that appellant was in Taylor County and ordered him rearrested as a prisoner at large to serve the remainder of the 120 days.

Relator applied to the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that since the 120 days had passed he could not now be called upon to serve such term. From an adverse ruling in the District Court, the appellant appealed to this Court and relies upon two recent opinions of this Court in Ex parte Griffin, Tex.Cr.App., 258 S.W.2d 324, and Ex parte Morgan, Tex.Cr.App., 262 S.W.2d 728.

The record is before us by stipulations which are meager. Sufficient evidence is not brought forward to authorize us to conclude that the County Judge acted under the authority of Article 137, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., when he ordered appellant released and so we must decide this question solely upon the void condition that appellant leave Taylor County.

In Ex parte Griffin, supra, the prisoner was released from custody by an order of the judge purporting to act under the Adult Probation and Parole Law, Ver-nons’ Ann.C.C.P. art. 781b. We were careful to note in that opinion that by no con*547duct on the part of the prisoner did he escape confinement.

In Ex parte Morgan, supra, the prisoner was released in compliance with a secret agreement between the prisoner’s parents and the judge. There, again, we were careful to note that the prisoner himself was not a moving factor in securing his release.

On the other hand, in Ex parte Wyatt, 29 Tex.App. 398, 16 S.W. 301, it was at the prisoner’s own request that he was allowed to remain at large.

Therein lies the distinction between the cases, and we think the Wyatt case is here controlling.

When appellant’s attorney requested his release he became the moving factor and cannot now take advantage of a void order on the part of the County Judge.

The judgment of the District Court ia affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         7877668
<SECURITIES>                                   1912918
<RECEIVABLES>                                    46982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9837568
<PP&E>                                        29691467
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40338664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1076487
<BONDS>                                         472312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    38789865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40338664
<SALES>                                        4917267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5220740
<CGS>                                          1029200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1029200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1100156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (17291)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3108675
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3108675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3108675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    77.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    77.10


</TABLE>
#### Savannah DAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28898.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction was for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.-
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1962 

To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 

Prevention Act of 2004 until June 1, 2015, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2011 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. ROGERS of 

Michigan, and Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and the 

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 

2004 until June 1, 2015, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PATRIOT Sunsets 

5 Extension Act of 2011’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1962 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUNSET EXTENSIONS. 

2 (a) USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHOR3 IZATION ACT OF 2005.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA 

4 PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 

5 (Public Law 109–177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 

6 1861 note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘May 27, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1, 2015’’. 

8 (b) INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PRE9 VENTION ACT OF 2004.—Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intel10 ligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 

11 (Public Law 108–458; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended 

12 by striking ‘‘May 27, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1, 

13 2015’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS