alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2006.txt

Station ID: 72290 Run ID: 

Start Date: 1/1/2006 - 00:00

End Date: 12/31/2006 - 23:00

 Frequency Distribution

 (Count)

 Speed Knots

 Wind Direction 1 - 4 4 - 7 7 - 11 11 - 17 17 -

21 >= 22 Total

 348.75 - 11.25 330 7 0 0 

0 0 337

 11.25 - 33.75 161 1 0 0 

0 0 162

 33.75 - 56.25 102 1 0 0 

0 0 103

 56.25 - 78.75 158 2 1 0 

0 0 161

 78.75 - 101.25 438 20 9 2 

0 0 469

 101.25 - 123.75 536 85 88 15 

0 0 724

 123.75 - 146.25 393 41 3 1 

0 0 438

 146.25 - 168.75 152 14 3 2 

0 0 171

 168.75 - 191.25 101 38 8 3 

0 0 150

 191.25 - 213.75 93 40 11 5 

0 0 149

 213.75 - 236.25 104 65 22 1 

0 0 192

 236.25 - 258.75 187 96 11 3 

0 0 297

 258.75 - 281.25 574 568 35 4 

0 0 1181

 281.25 - 303.75 736 1205 75 7 

0 0 2023

 303.75 - 326.25 931 396 23 0 

0 0 1350

 326.25 - 348.75 510 44 2 0 

0 0 556

 Sub-Total: 5506 2623 291 43 

0 0 8463

 Calms: 

 286

Missing/Incomplete: 

 11

 Total: 

 8760

Frequency of Calm Winds: 3.27%

Average Wind Speed: 3.23 Knots

Station ID: 72290 Run ID: 

Start Date: 1/1/2006 - 00:00

End Date: 12/31/2006 - 23:00

Page 1
2006.txt

 Frequency Distribution

 (Normalized)

 Speed Knots

 Wind Direction 1 - 4 4 - 7 7 - 11 11 - 17 17 -

21 >= 22 Total

 348.75 - 11.25 0.037719 0.000800 0.000000 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.038519

 11.25 - 33.75 0.018402 0.000114 0.000000 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.018516

 33.75 - 56.25 0.011658 0.000114 0.000000 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.011773

 56.25 - 78.75 0.018059 0.000229 0.000114 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.018402

 78.75 - 101.25 0.050063 0.002286 0.001029 0.000229 

0.000000 0.000000 0.053606

 101.25 - 123.75 0.061264 0.009715 0.010058 0.001714 

0.000000 0.000000 0.082752

 123.75 - 146.25 0.044919 0.004686 0.000343 0.000114 

0.000000 0.000000 0.050063

 146.25 - 168.75 0.017373 0.001600 0.000343 0.000229 

0.000000 0.000000 0.019545

 168.75 - 191.25 0.011544 0.004343 0.000914 0.000343 

0.000000 0.000000 0.017145

 191.25 - 213.75 0.010630 0.004572 0.001257 0.000571 

0.000000 0.000000 0.017031

 213.75 - 236.25 0.011887 0.007429 0.002515 0.000114 

0.000000 0.000000 0.021945

 236.25 - 258.75 0.021374 0.010973 0.001257 0.000343 

0.000000 0.000000 0.033947

 258.75 - 281.25 0.065607 0.064922 0.004000 0.000457 

0.000000 0.000000 0.134987

 281.25 - 303.75 0.084124 0.137730 0.008572 0.000800 

0.000000 0.000000 0.231226

 303.75 - 326.25 0.106412 0.045262 0.002629 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.154303

 326.25 - 348.75 0.058292 0.005029 0.000229 0.000000 

0.000000 0.000000 0.063550

 Sub-Total: 0.629329 0.299806 0.033261 0.004915 

0.000000 0.000000 0.966096

 Calms: 

 0.032648

Missing/Incomplete: 

 0.001256

 Total: 

 1.000000

Frequency of Calm Winds: 3.27%

Average Wind Speed: 3.23 Knots

Page 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Jamba, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. White, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date:March 10, 2010 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
| **OTHER COMMENTS Warehousing and Distribution (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 3 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Warehousing and Distribution [Line Items]**                                     |           |   |
| Warehousing and distribution expense                                              | $ 77.1         | $ 70.0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
[Line Items] for Warehousing and Distribution [Table]
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_WarehousingandDistributionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of expense related to the production and distribution of goods or services to customers and clients.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_ProductionAndDistributionCosts**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
#### Carl MELTON, d/b/a Carl Melton Motor Co., Appellant, v. J. M. COUCH, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 18, 1955.

Isaac Turner, Hyden, for appellant.

Will C. Hoskins, Denver Adams, Hyden, for appellee

*657PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Leslie Circuit Court by appellant, Carl Melton, who does business as Carl Melton Motor Company, from a judgment in favor of appellee, J. M. Couch, for damages in the sum of $400 resulting from the wrongful detention of a truck. We believe that the case was correctly submitted to the jury under the instructions given by the court.

A consideration of the record and of the points raised by appellant has failed to disclose any error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

         

         

**Consent of Independent        Registered Public Accounting Firm**

National Home Health Care        Corp.

Scarsdale, New York

We hereby consent to the        incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 033-61315 and        333-46076) of National Home Health Care Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated October        26, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in the Annual        Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form        10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated October 26,        2007 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on        Form 10-K.

         

        /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP        Valhalla, New York

October 29, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30240

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ ANGEL ORTIZ-CARDENAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-114-A

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

José Angel Ortiz-Cardenas appeals his sentence for illegal

reentry of a deported alien by arguing that the district court

erred by sentencing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) instead

of subsection (a). He concedes that his argument is foreclosed

by United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943, 946 (5th Cir.

1993). Notwithstanding that our decision in United States v.

Almendarez-Torres, 113 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), is pending in

the Supreme Court, see 117 S. Ct. 1333 (1997), one panel may not
No. 97-30240

-2-

overrule the decision of a prior panel absent en banc 

reconsideration or superseding Supreme Court authority. Pruitt

v. Levi Strauss & Co., 932 F.2d 458, 465 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unico, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ray C. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.

/s/ Ray C. Brown
---------------------------------
Ray C. Brown
Chief Executive Officer
January 12, 2004
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, 

Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2062 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Saga4 more Beach, Massachusetts, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-33660]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0547; FRL-9480-1]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San 
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)

Correction

    In rule document 2011-33660 appearing on pages 214-217 in the issue 
of Wednesday, January 4, 2012, make the following corrections:
    (1) On page 214, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
second line, ``February 3, 2011'' should read ``February 3, 2012''.
    (2) On page 217, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in the 
fifth line, ``March 7, 2011'' should read ``March 5, 2012''.

[FR Doc. C1-2011-33660 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit
10.99


 





November
20, 2018


 


John
M. Desmarais


26
Deer Creek Lane


Mt.
Kisco, New York 10549


 


Dear
Mr. Desmarais:


 


Reference
is made to that certain Promissory Note, dated July 13, 2017, as amended (the “Note”), issued by BioRestorative Therapies,
Inc. (the “Company”) to John M. Desmarais (the “Lender”) in the principal amount of $175,000 (the “Principal
Amount”). The Note provides that the Principal Amount, together with accrued interest thereon, is payable on December 1,
2018 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


The
Lender hereby waives any and all defaults by the Company under the Note. The parties agree that the Note is hereby amended such
that the Maturity Date for the payment of the Principal Amount, together with accrued interest thereon, shall be extended to December
31, 2019.


 


In
consideration of the foregoing, the Company agrees that the expiration dates of the Warrants, dated March 18, 2016, as amended,
issued to the Lender for the purchase of 444,444 and 400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, respectively (collectively,
the “Warrants”), are extended to December 31, 2019 and the exercise price of the Warrants is reduced to $1.50 per
share.


 


Except
as modified herein, the Note and the Warrants shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms.
In addition, the Security Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2017, by and among the Company, Tuxis Trust, the Lender and John M.
Desmarais, as representative, shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


This
letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


This
letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, excluding choice of law principles
thereof.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BIORESTORATIVE
    THERAPIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Mark
    Weinreb
	 	 	Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	Agreed:	 	 
	 	 	 
	John
    M. Desmarais
EX 10.19


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


First  Amendment to the Services Agreement entered into on March 6, 2018, between Ariel Scientific Innovations Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Israel ("Ariel"), and Qrons Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the "Company").







WHEREAS, the Company and Ariel are parties to the Services Agreement related to the services of  Dr. Gadi Tugerman  and his AU team ; and







WHEREAS, the Company and Ariel desire to amend the Services Agreement to extend the term thereof for an additional twelve months as provided herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Services Agreement.







2.    Amendment. The Services Agreement shall be hereby amended as follows:







The Service Period as defined in Section 1.2 of the Services Agreement is hereby extended for an additional twelve-month period and shall terminate on March 6, 2020,


 


3. Fees. In consideration for the performance of the Services, the Company shall pay Ariel a total amount of $41,160 in quarterly payments in advance of $10,290 commencing on the execution of this agreement and on the 1st of June, September and December 2019.







3. Ratification. Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and affirmed.







4. Counterparts. This First Amendment made be executed in one or more counterparts each of whch when executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto effective as of March  6, 2019.







	
Ariel Scientific Innovations Ltd.


By: /s/Larry Loev


Name: Larry Loev


Title: CEO

	
Qrons Inc.


By: /s/Jonah Meer


Jonah Meer


Chief Executive Officer
HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 35265 1979
HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 35266 1979
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6**  **455**

DAMON ELLIOTT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ERIC D. WILSON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1 :1 4

- cv - 0 0 209

- LO

- JFA )

Submitted : May 22, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Damon Elliott , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Damon Elliott , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have review ed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Elliott v. Wilson , No. 1:14

- cv - 00209

- LO

- JFA (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 11, 2014; entered Mar. 14, 2014)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Victoria Industries, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), Albert
Abdoulline,  as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge,  that:

(1)     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities   Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


By:/S/ Albert Abdoulline
------------------------
Albert Abdoulline
President, CEO
Date:  May  15,  2007
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Michael Shaffer  |
|   | Michael ShafferExecutive Vice President andChief Operating & Financial Officer |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2070 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the World 

War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an 

inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed 

with the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 1, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. STIVERS, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the 

area of the World War II Memorial in the District of 

Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription with the 

words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 

the Nation on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘World War II Memo5 rial Prayer Act of 2011’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2070 IH

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT 

2 WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL. 

3 The Secretary of the Interior— 

4 (1) shall install in the area of the World War 

5 II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable 

6 plaque or an inscription with the words that Presi7 dent Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with the Nation 

8 on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day; 

9 (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install 

10 the plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph 

11 (1); and 

12 (3) may accept and expend private contribu13 tions for the cost of preparing and installing the 

14 plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Zac Hellett HARTMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27700.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated ; the punishment, five days in jail and a fine of $250.

The state’s evidence shows that appellant was seen driving a pick-up truck at a high rate of speed and in an, erratic manner upon a public street in the City of Dallas on the day in question; that after stopping and getting out of his pick-up, he staggered, was unable to talk, plainly and had the odor of alcohol on his breath. The two police officers who apprehended appellant testified that, in their opinion, he was intoxicated.

Appellant, while testifying in his own behalf, admitted that he was driving the pick-up truck and that he had drunk “three beers” during the evening, but denied being intoxicated. He offered two witnesses who testified that they were with appellant a short time before his arrest and it was *740their testimony that he was not then intoxicated.

The jury resolved the issue of intoxication against appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support their verdict.

Appellant contends that the court erred in admitting testimony concerning his refusal to take an intoximeter test. We find an abundance of testimony in the record, without objection, showing the discussions between the officers and appellant about whether he would take such a test. Thus, no error is here shown.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### George (Tiny) PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28724.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1957.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty before the court, is for the unlawful sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Natural Gas Exports and Re-Exports by Country

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_move_expc_s1_a.htm 15:35:19 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Series Linkhttp://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9130us2a.htm Series KeyN9130US2.A Year U.S. Natural Gas Exports MMcf 2012 1618828 2011 1505650 20101136789 20091072357 2008 963263 2007 822454 2006 723958 2005 728601 2004 854138 2003 679922 2002 516233 2001 373278 2000 243716 1999 163415 1998 159007 1997 157006 1996 153393 1995 154119 1994 161738 1993 140183 1992 216282 1991 129244 1990 85565 1989 106871 1988 73638 1987 54020 1986 61271 1985 55268 1984 54753 1983 54639 1982 51728 1981 59372 1980 48731 1979 55673 1978 52532 1977 55625 1976 64710 1975 72675 1974 76789 1973 77169