p. 1


# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 125 ) IV-E-11 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/23/2008 7:21:47AM

Sheet 125 of 242P. 2 

## A-<n-< ( 

# r/ - £ - 

# 'I

s 

# '
Januar y 24 , 199 4 Memorandumt o th e Docket From : Dic k

Wilson , Orfic e o

f Mobil e Source s Subject : Administrator' s Discussion s wit h Outsid e Partie s Regardin g Final Rul e on On
Boar dRefueling Control s for

Moto r Vehicle s under

th e Clea n Ai r Ac t On Thursday , Januar

y 2 0 andFriday , Januar

y 21 , th e Administrato r

participate di n fou

r telephon e conversation s wit h representativ e ofth e domesti c automobil e manufacturer s t o discus s variou s subject s relatedt o th e fina l rul e o n On-Boar

dRefuelin g Control s for

Moto r Vehicle s under th e Clea n Ai r Act . EP A participant s include d(no t al l person s were present

fo r al l telephon e calls) : Caro l Browner , Administrato r Mar y Nichols , Assistan

t Administrator

for Ai r andRadiatio n (OAR

) Dan aMinerva , Office o f

th e Administrator

(OA) Nanc y Sutley , OA Dic k Wilson , OA

R Rei dWilson , Offic e of

Communications , Educatio n andPubli c Affairs (OCEPA) Dav e Cohen , OCEP

A Automobil e manufacture

r representative s include d(not al l person s wer

e present fo r al l telephon e calls) : Bil l Hoagland , G

M Denni s Minano , G

M Hele n Petrauskas , FordMoto r Ro n Boltz , Chrysler Th e primar

y subject o f discussio n wa s th e potentia l applicabilit

y of th e fina l rul e t o light-dut

y trucks . Th e participant s discusse dth e technica l andengineerin g constraint s associate dwit h requirin g on-boardcontrol s i n light-dut y truck s of

variou s weigh

t categories . The

y als o discusse d truc k

sale s b y weigh

t categor y andth e percentag e of

refueling emission s associate d wit h eac h weigh

t category . Finally , th e participant s discusse dth e feasibilit y an dphasin g i n o f complianc e date s by model yea r an dwithin weigh

t categories . N o ne

w dat ao r information wa s presente d durin g thos e conversatio n beyondinformatio n alread y in th e record. Tw o document s prepare db y representatives of th e automobil e manufacturer s ar e attached .P. 3

JflN-iW-y i TH U 1 y : k' b E& t STAF F FAX NO , 13135567 5 

### 7 7 P

. 0 2

9 8 M Y 

### 40 % P C
40 % P C 9 9 M Y

80 % P C 

# oofyv ^

100 % P C
80 % P C J100 % P C

40 % LDT 1 0 1 M Y

40 % LDT 1 & 2
80 % LDT 1 0 2 M Y

80 % LDT 1 & 2 

# t 100°//LDT 1 0 3 M Y

100 % LDT 1 & 2

Proposa l inclurf<5s :

N o future(ORVR(regulatio n o f Truck s Exclude s al l Incomplete s

### PROPOSA L l-rUt ' t
'• * I C O •* J
. •Pl



### 9 8 M Y 40 % PC 99 MY

80 % P C 100%

PC 0 0 M Y ] 0 1 M

Y « 40 % LDT1, 2 0 2 M

Y 80 % LDT1, 2 0 3 M Y

100 % LDT1, 2 Manufacturers need flexibility l o includ e LDT3 s soone r I f necessar y fo r evaluation , an y earl y implementatio n o

f LDT3 s shoul d coun t toward LDT1, 2 requirements . N o future ORV R regulation s o n additiona l Trucks . Al l incomplete s excluded . t o

m m t o

O

LDT1 : an y Hgh

t light-dut

y truc k u p throug h 3750# loade d vehicl e weigh t an d lea s tha n 6000 * GVWR . LDT2 : an y ligh t light-dut y truc k greate r tha n 3750 * loade d vehicl e weigh t an d les s tha n 6000 * GVWR . LDT3 : an y heav

y light-dut

y truc k u p throug h 57S0

# adjuste d loade d vehicl e weigh t an d betwee n 6000f t an d 8500 * GVWR . C O c n c n C D c n

C7Z >