alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Petroleum Company as of
September 30, 1998, and the related consolidated statement of income for
the nine months ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                        14
<INVENTORY>                                        599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,365
<PP&E>                                          22,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,426
<BONDS>                                          3,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              650
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           308
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,462
<SALES>                                          8,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,167
<CGS>                                            7,517<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,694<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    879
<INCOME-TAX>                                       432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
<FN>
<F1> Purchased crude oil and products + Production and operating expenses +
     Exploration expenses + Depreciation, depletion and amortization.
<F2> CGS + Taxes other than income taxes.
<F3> Preferred dividend requirements of capital trusts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of IHS Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the period ended November 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: January 23, 2008                                                                         |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JERRE L. STEADJerre L. Stead Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                           |  | 
|/s/MICHAEL J. SULLIVANMichael J. Sullivan Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40780 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIA COSTANZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CR-209-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Maria Costanza has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief, Costanza’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Costanza’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
#### Robert S. BELL, Appellant, v. George SHAFFER, Appellee.

No. 12963.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 28, 1955.

Royce A. Oxford, Edinburg, for appellant.

W. B. Spell, McAllen, for appellee.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by Robert S. Bell against George Shaffer and James Deaton to recover an alleged very valuable registered quarter horse stallion or in the alternative the value of such horse, alleged to be $2,000.

The trial court found that in May, 1954, Bell sold the horse to Shaffer for the sum of $75, and that he did not loan the horse to Shaffer as contended by Bell. Recovery of the horse or the value thereof was denied to Bell, but he was granted judgment in the sum of $75 against Shaffer, which the trial court found was the unpaid purchase price of the horse. Deaton was dismissed from the suit.

Robert S. Bell has prosecuted this appeal. He contends that the evidence does not support the finding of the court that he sold the horse to Shaffer in May, 1954. We overrule this contention. The evidence of the disinterested witness Raymond Weisehan was sufficient to support this finding.

Appellant next contends that the court should have found there was no written bill of sale evidencing the sale, and, further, that Article 1482 of the Penal Code makes a sale of a horse without a written bill of sale unlawful.

The effect of the Civil Statutes, Art. 6983 and Art. 7005, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. Stats., has the effect of exempting Hidalgo County from the written bill of sale’s provision of the statutes.

Among the annotations under Art. 1482, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code, we find the following:

> “Those counties exempt by Article 7005, R.C.S., as amended in 1945, are exempt from laws regulating the inspection of hides and animals and bill of sale required for same.” Op.Atty.Gen., 1946, No. 0-7242.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND EXHIBIT 11 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,610
<INVENTORY>                                     68,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,458
<PP&E>                                         151,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,531
<BONDS>                                          4,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           234
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,274
<SALES>                                        330,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               332,808
<CGS>                                          152,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Phillips Petroleum Company as of March 31,
1999, and the related consolidated statement of income for the three months
ended March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                        539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,556
<PP&E>                                          22,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,055
<BONDS>                                          4,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              650
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,460
<SALES>                                          2,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,539
<CGS>                                            2,124<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,185<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     99
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 70
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        70
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
<FN>
<F1> Purchased crude oil and products + Production and operating expenses +
     Exploration expenses + Depreciation, depletion and amortization.
<F2> CGS + Taxes other than income taxes.
<F3> Preferred dividend requirements of capital trusts.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
JAMES TRISTAN GAY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4170

Opinion filed October 2, 2015.

Petition for Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel - Original 

Jurisdiction.

James Tristan Gay, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Odis MATHIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28169.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

•No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin,, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is possession of intoxicating' liquor in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine-of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte Travis PHILLIPS.

No. 27999.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1956.

*751William E. Davenport, San Angelo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was arrested in Tom Green County, Texas, upon a warrant issued by J. P. Spangler, Justice of the Peace, Precinct No. 1, Grayson County, Texas, in which court appellant was charged by complaint with the felony offense of swindling. No bond was set, and upon arresting appellant the Sheriff of Tom Green County placed him in jail.

By habeas corpus appellant sought to be released upon bail for his appearance before said Justice Court of Precinct No. 1 of Grayson County, Texas, and upon being denied such relief has appealed to this Court.

. Art. 451, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 451 is controlling, and requires in such ■case of arrest that the sheriff making the arrest “shall require a reasonable amount of bail.”

The judgment denying the relief prayed for is reversed, and the Sheriff of Tom 'Green County is directed to release appellant from custody upon his entering into a good and sufficient bond, to be approved by said sheriff, in the reasonable amount to be set by the said sheriff, payable to the State of Texas and conditioned, as required by law, for appellant’s appearance before the Justice Court, Precinct No. 1 of Grayson County, Texas, instanter.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 28, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10674

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT TODD WILLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-163-2-A 

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Todd Willis was convicted of mail fraud and aiding

and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 1341. He appeals

the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised

release. Willis argues that the district court erred by

sentencing him above the statutory maximum sentence for

revocation. In particular, he contends that once the district

court imposed a two-year term of imprisonment, it was not

authorized to impose an additional one-year term of supervised
No. 04-10674

-2-

release because this violated 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) (2002). The

Government concedes error.

We review the alleged imposition of a sentence above the

statutory maximum de novo. See United States v. Sias, 227 F.3d

244, 246 (5th Cir. 2000). The penalties imposed on revocation of

supervised release relate back to the original offense. See

Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 701-02 (2000). 

Accordingly, the statutes in effect at the time of Willis’s

offense conduct, which occurred in 1995, apply. See United

States v. Smith, 869 F.2d 835, 836-37 (5th Cir. 1989). Because

Willis’s offense was a class D felony, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 &

3559(a)(4) (1995), the maximum term of imprisonment that he could

receive upon revocation of supervised release was two years. See

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (1995). In light of the district court’s

decision to sentence Willis to the maximum term of imprisonment,

the court erred by also imposing a one-year term of supervised

release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h); United States v. Ferguson, 369

F.3d 847, 850-52 (2004). 

In sentencing Willis, the district court clearly stated its

intention to impose the maximum term of imprisonment in order to

allow Willis to obtain treatment for the drug problems that led

to the revocation of his supervised release. See United States

v. Mills, 9 F.3d 1132, 1139 (5th Cir. 1993). Therefore, we

MODIFY the district court’s judgment by VACATING the one-year

term of supervised release, and we AFFIRM the judgment AS

MODIFIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556 and 333-17843) pertaining to the
Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources,
Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser
Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock
Plan, respectively, of Kaiser Ventures Inc. of our report dated January 20,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Kaiser Ventures Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                              ---------------------
                              Ernst & Young LLP



Riverside, California
March 26, 1998

                                      93
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, William Kefalas, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Green Dolphin Systems
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact of
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the liability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ William Kefalas

________________

William Kefalas

Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 31, 2006
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1326 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM177AD

757 -53 -0094 --- 1/16/08 757 -53 -0089 --- 3/18/04

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY O FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |            |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |            |   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |

----