alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                             FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP
              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Leon Zimmerman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                     all material respects, the financial condition and results
                     of operations of the Company.

/s/  Leon Zimmerman
Leon Zimmerman
Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2004


                                       89
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7044

ALONZO DENNIS COPELAND, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. SHROM/RN, Registered Nurse; A. FREEMAN, Registered Nurse; 

C/O CLARK, Lieutenant; ESTATE OF DOCTOR WARREN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MS. MASSENBURG, ex. Institutional Ombudsman; MS. C. BOONE, 

ex. Institutional Ombudsman; MR. R. WOODSON, Regional 

Ombudsman; DOCTOR WARREN, Physician/Doctor,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:13-cv-00584-RBS-DEM)

Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth 

Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint 

as time-barred. The district court has granted Copeland’s Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, vacated its dismissed order, and the

complaint reinstated. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as 

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Louise C. SLACK et al.

No. 8659.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 10, 1937.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Claude I. Parker, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.

Before WILBUR and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of petitioner, consented to by respondent, ordered petition to review dismissed; that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, mandate forthwith.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARIO REGINALD ROGERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00120-JAB-1; 1:08-cv-00881-JABWWD)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 25, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Reginald Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Reginald Rogers seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Rogers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Stephen Clark Webb v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00174-CR

Trial court case number: 1389676

Trial court: 337th District Court of Harris County

On August 11, 2014, appellant filed his Third Agreed Motion to Extend Time to File 

Brief. The motion is GRANTED, in part. Appellant’s brief is due September 8, 2014. There 

will be no further extensions. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 14, 2014
H. R. 2062 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, 

Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 

A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-trax, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Anthony Tomaro,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Anthony Tomaro
------------------
Anthony Tomaro
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:April 19, 2006.                                                            /s/ Robert W. McMartin   Robert W. McMartin   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

          I, David A. Spector, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., Resecuritization Pass-Through Trust
          2005-8R;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
          included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee
          in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or
          similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
          master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
          agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

          Date: March 29, 2006

                                       /s/ David A. Spector
                                       --------------------
                                       David A. Spector
                                       Senior Managing Director
#### BISBEE LINSEED CO., Appellant, v. Barge THE M. J. O'DONNELL, Appellee.

No. 458.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 6, 1937.

*1008Lynch, Hagen & Atkins, of New York City (Horace T. Atkins, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Richard F. Lenahan and Leo F. Hanan, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Synova Healthcare Group, Inc., (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        | 
|Date: February 26, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert L. Edwards  
|                        |  | Robert L. Edwards      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1934 

To improve certain administrative operations of the Library of Congress, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2011 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To improve certain administrative operations of the Library 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING USE OF PROCEEDS FROM DIS4 POSITION OF SURPLUS OR OBSOLETE PER5 SONAL PROPERTY. 

6 (a) DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY.—Within the limits 

7 of available appropriations, the Librarian of Congress may 

8 dispose of surplus or obsolete personal property of the Li9 brary of Congress by interagency transfer, donation, sale, 

10 trade-in, or other appropriate method. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1934 IH

1 (b) USE OF PROCEEDS.—Any amounts received by 

2 the Librarian of Congress from the disposition of property 

3 under subsection (a) shall be credited to the funds avail4 able for the operations of the Library of Congress, and 

5 shall be available to acquire the same or similar property 

6 during the fiscal year in which the amounts are received 

7 and the following fiscal year. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

9 respect to fiscal year 2012 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David T. Gulian, the Chief Executive Officer of InfoLogix, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                                                                          |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: April 15, 2009                                                     |  | 
|/s/ DAVID T. GULIAN David T. Gulian President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### BATSON v. STATE.

No. 26469.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1953.

*571No attorney on appeal for' appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft; the punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for 90 days.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof no question is presented for review.

All matters of procedure being in regular form, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-trax, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Anthony Tomaro, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Anthony Tomaro
------------------
Anthony Tomaro
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002


                                       33
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Network Engines, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gregory A. Shortell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 11, 2008 | /s/ Gregory A. Shortell                               |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **                    | **Gregory A. Shortell*****Chief Executive  Officer*** |

 

38

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1565

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Defendants-Appellees.

David F. Barton , The Gardner Law Firm, of San Anto nio, Texas, argued for plaintiffappellant.

Conor B. Dugan , Attorney, Appellate Section, Civ il Rights Division, United States

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant s-appellees. With him on

the brief were Thomas E. Perez , Assistant Attorney General, Mark L. Gross and Lisa Wilson

Edwards , Attorneys.

Appealed from: United States District C ourt for the Western District of Texas

Judge Xavier RodriguezNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1565

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Defendants-Appellees.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Distr ict Court for the Western District of Texas

in CASE NO(S). 98-CV-1011

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge , LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
#### Annie EALIM and Bennie Clark, Jr., Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 38570.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1965.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Dee. 15, 1965.

*894J. T. Maroney, Jr., Lufkin; William D. Winston and C. E. Brazil, Lufkin (on appeal), for appellants.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

Appellants were convicted of burglary of a private residence at night with intent to commit theft. The punishment of each was assessed at five years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

The recognizance found in the record is not in compliance with Art. 817, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Among other things, it does not contain a provision that appellants are to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals. For this Court to acquire jurisdiction of an appeal from a felony conviction, the bond or recognizance upon which the appellant was enlarged must bind him to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals in the case appealed. Salter v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 482, 264 S.W.2d 719 and cases there cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION TO RE-INSTATE APPPEAL

By supplemental transcript, it is shown that appellants have properly entered into a recognizance in compliance with Article 817, V.A.C.C.P., and the record is properly before this Court for review. The appeal is re-instated.

An examination of the statement of facts does not disclose that it was ever filed with the clerk of the trial court as is required by Article 759a, V.A.C.C.P. The statement of facts therefore cannot be considered as a part of the appellate record. Reed v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 373 S.W.2d 687; Salyer v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 532, 316 S.W.2d 420.

No formal bills of exception are contained in the transcript.

As all proceedings appear to be regular, the judgment is affirmed.