alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                      SAFEGUARD HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC.

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The wholly owned subsidiaries of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, are as follows:

1.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., an Arizona corporation
2.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a California corporation
3.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Colorado corporation
4.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Florida corporation
5.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., an Illinois corporation
6.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Kansas corporation
7.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Kentucky corporation
8.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Missouri corporation
9.   SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Nevada corporation
10.  SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., an Ohio corporation
11.  SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation
12.  SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., an Oregon corporation
13.  SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Texas corporation
14.  SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a Utah corporation
15.  SafeHealth Life Insurance Company, Inc., a Texas corporation
16.  Advantage Dental HealthPlans, Inc., a Delaware corporation
17.  Advantage Dental HealthPlans, Inc., a Missouri corporation
18.  Advantage Dental HealthPlans, Inc., a Florida corporation
19.  ADH Marketing, Inc., a Florida Corporation
20.  ADH Plans, Inc., a Delaware corporation
21.  Advantage Dental Plans, Inc., a Delaware corporation
22.  Guards Dental, Inc., a California corporation
      (A wholly owned subsidiary of SafeGuard Health Plans, Inc., a
      California corporation)
23.  SafeHealth Life Insurance Company, a California corporation
24.  SafeHealth Life Insurance Company, Inc., a Texas corporation
25.  First American Dental Benefits, Inc., a Texas corporation
26.  Imprimis Practice Management Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation
27.  TRC Agency, Inc., a Texas corporation

                                 Exhibit 21.1

                                      31
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Global Assets
& Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 23, 2003


/s/Bertram Cutler
-----------------------
Bertram Cutler, President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE 1930.4 OF

THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

CIVIL PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

: NO. 686

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of September, 2018 , upon the recommendation of the

Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been submitted

without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3) in the interest of efficient

administration :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule 1930.4 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is amended in the

attached form.

This order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall

be effect ive on September 28 , 20 18

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
EX - 22.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                                Jurisdiction of
        Name                                                     Incorporation
        ----                                                    ---------------

Bel Fuse Limited ...............................................  Hong Kong

Bel Fuse Macau LDA .............................................  Macau

Bel Delaware LLC ...............................................  Delaware

Bel Fuse Europe Ltd. ...........................................  United Kingdom

Bel Magnetics Ltd. .............................................  Texas

Bel Fuse America Inc. ..........................................  Delaware

Bel Fuse Delaware Inc. .........................................  Delaware

Bel Fuse California Inc. .......................................  Delaware

Bel Ventures Inc. ..............................................  Delaware

Bel Power Products Inc. ........................................  Delaware

Bel Power (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd. ..................................  China
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549 

FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)February 28, 2022PVH CORP. /DE/(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware001-0757213-1166910    (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue,New York,New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code  (212)-381-3500Not Applicable(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act      (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act      (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock, $1 par valuePVHNew York Stock ExchangeIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).Emerging growth company  ☐If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. oItem 8.01. Other Events. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of PVH Corp. (the “Company”) declared on February 28, 2022 a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0375 per share on the Company’s common stock. The dividend ispayable on March 30, 2022 to stockholders of record on March 11, 2022. A press release announcing the dividend is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.Item 9.01. Financial Statements And Exhibits.(d)  Exhibits.Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit99.1Press Release dated February 28, 2022.104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.PVH CORP. By: /s/ Mark D. Fischer      Mark D. FischerExecutive Vice President, General Counsel andSecretary Date: February 28, 2022
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6430

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYL ROBINSON, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00373-CCB-1; 1:18-cv-01815-CCB)

Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Robinson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clinton Jacob Fuchs, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Robinson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as timebarred Robinson’s amended and supplemented 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.*

 The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of 

a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

 * Robinson purported to seek relief from his federal conviction and sentence through 

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012). The district court provided proper notice, pursuant to Castro v. 

United States, 540 U.S. 375, 377 (2003), of its intent to recharacterize Robinson’s § 2241 

petition as an initial § 2255 motion, allowed Robinson to supplement and amend his claims, 

and proceeded to analyze the advanced claims under § 2255. 
3

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 11 35

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
So nya Lee Hern an de z
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa - Ft. Do dg e

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 20 , 20 16 Fi le d: Decem

be r 20 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Afte r pl ead in g gu il ty to co ns pi rin g to di st rib ut e m et ha m ph et am in e, So nya Hern an de z ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce. Hern an de z’s 1

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof I owa

.co un se l ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f fil ed un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e di st ric t co ur t erre d by no t de pa rti ng fu rth er, an d by im po si ng an un reas on ab le se nt en ce. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 12 91 , th is co ur t af

fir m s.

The ex te nt of th e di st ric t co ur t’s de pa rtu re is no t rev ie wa b l e o n a p p e al

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. W

il li ams , 32 4 F.3d 10 49 , 10 50 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (p er cu ria m ) (ex te nt of do wnwar d de pa rtu re is no t su bjec t to rev ie w, un le ss de fen da nt m ak es su bs ta nt ia l sh owi ng th at di st ric t co ur t’s re fu sa l to de pa rt fur th er was ba se d o n u nc on st it ut io na l

m ot iv e). Thi s co ur t fin ds th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab u s e it s di sc ret io n in

se nt en ci ng Hern an de z b e c au se it im po se d th e be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce aft er
co ns id eri ng th e 18 U.S.C. § 33 53 (a) f a c t o r s

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Mil le r , 55 7 F.3 d 91 0, 91 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (u nd er su bs ta nt iv e-re as on ab le ne ss te st , di st ric t co ur t ab us es it s di sc ret io n if it fai ls to co ns id er rel ev an t § 35 53 (a) fact or , gi ve s si gn ifi can t weig ht to im pr op er or irr el ev an t f

a c t o r , or co m

m it s cl ear erro r of jud gm en t in weig hi ng fact or s) ; Uni te d St at es v. Moo re , 5 8 1 F

. 3 d 68 1, 68 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (p er cu ria m ) (“ [W] he re a di st ric t co ur t h a s se nt en ced a de fen da nt be lo w th e ad vi so ry gu id el in es
ran ge , it is ne arl y in co nc ei va bl e th at th e co ur t ab u s e d i t s di sc ret io n in no t va ry in g do wnwar d st il l fu rth er.”)

. Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd p u rs ua nt to Pe ns on v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , th is co ur t fin ds no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

.

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m edan d c ou ns el ’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### Kenneth R. GROSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28792.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 6, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This purports to be an appeal from the order revoking probation and imposing sentence for four years in the penitentiary for felony theft.

The record does not reflect that notice of appeal was given to this court as required by law.

Without a proper notice of appeal, this court has no jurisdiction of the case.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-156725) on
Form S-8, and Registration Statement (No. 333-164241) on Form S-3/A of Summer Infant, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2011,
relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summer Infant, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2010.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Boston, MA
March 22, 2011


---



QuickLinks
#### MARILYN CONDIE *v.*EDWIN WHITNEY

(14854)

Landau, Schaller and Stoughton, Js.

Argued January 16

decision released February 13, 1996

*Margaret J. Slez,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Robert Luysterborghs,*with whom, on the brief, was *Jonathan Perkins,*for the appellee (named plaintiff).

*T. R. Rowe,*for the appellee (intervening plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-trax, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
S. Wheeler,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ William S. Wheeler
-------------------------
William S. Wheeler
Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003

                                       35
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12339]


Designation of Ansarallah as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order 13224, as amended (``E.O. 13224'' or 
``Order''), I hereby determine that the person known as Ansarallah 
(also known as Ansar Allah, Ansarullah, Partisans of God, Supporters of 
God, and Houthi group) is a foreign person who has committed or 
attempted to commit, poses a significant risk of committing, or has 
participated in training to commit, acts of terrorism that threaten the 
security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or 
economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that 
prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might 
have a constitutional presence in the United States would render 
ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order 
because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine 
that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this 
determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United 
States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures 
authorized in the Order.
    The designation goes into effect on February 16, 2024. This notice 
shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 12, 2024.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-04065 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DORAN LEVELLE MORAGNE, )

DOC #R60304, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2373

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 22, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Joseph N. D'Achille, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
      32.2(*)






Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
      Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      T. Everett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the
      best of my knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:
      May
      9, 2006










/s/ MICHAEL
      T. EVERETT






Michael
      T. Everett






Chief
      Financial Officer








































_____________________________






(*)
      In
      accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
      33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
      Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany
      this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether
      made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
      specifically incorporates it by reference.
































Form
          10-Q
          for quarter ended March 31, 2006
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 135)**

 

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Eschelon Telecom, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),Geoffrey M. Boyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that tohis knowledge:

 

(1)          The reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| Sign:             | /s/ Geoffrey M. Boyd    |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|              | Geoffrey M. Boyd        |   |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|              |                    |   |
|              |                    |   |
| November 10, 2004 |                    |

 

 

 

----