alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reynolds ANDRICKS et al., Appellants, v. Sam H. SCHAEFER, Appellee.

No. 12886.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 11, 1955.

*422Carlos C. Cadena, Frank D. Masters, San Antonio, for áppellants.-

James R. Warncke, Jack Davis, San Antonio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because no appeal bond, was filed. Appellants, Andricks and others, contend that as members of the Planning Commission of the City of San Antonio they are not required to give an appeal bond. Articles 1174 and 2072, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Stats.

The decree appealed from provides that:

> •‘‘It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue directing and commanding the defendants, Reynolds Andricks, J. A. West, George Delavan, Phillip L. Willis, John Toudouze, John T. Wilkins, Frank M. Valdez, E. T. Johnson and Samuel D. Kane in their official capacities and also individually and personally to forthwith proceed with all reasonable dispatch to meet as the planning commission of the City of San Antonio and issue to plaintiff a certificate, showing the filing date of plaintiff’s plat of Loma Alta Addition No. 4, and further showing that the said commission failed to disapprove said plat within thirty days from said filing date, * *

While this order purports to bind Andricks and the others therein • named, “individually and personally,” it is apparent that the actions required by the order must necessarily be performed by them as members of the Planning Commission of the City of San Antoniq,- The relief sought by ap-pellee, as disclosed by his petition, was such as could be awarded only by a mandatory decree running against appellants as the “duly appointed, qualified and acting members of the Planning Commission of the City of San Antonio.” Such Planning Commission is a governmental agency of the City of San Antonio and is not required to give a bond to perfect an appeal to this Court. Board of Adjustment of City of Fort Worth v. Stovall, 147 Tex. 366, 216 S.W.2d 171.

Motion overruled.
#### Billy VAN PRICHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28107.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 29, 1956.

'No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1 5 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 1 5 , 2017

15 6 192 ( 28 )

HOME

- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff/ Counterdefendant

- Appellant

, SC: 15 6 1 92

v C OA : 336464

Montcalm CC: 2015

- 020669

- CK

ADVANCED FARM EQUIPMENT, LLC,

Defendant/ Cross

- Defendant

- Appellee,

and

BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff/

Cross

- Plaintiff

- Appellee

and

KYLE LENNARD, STEFANI LENNARD, and

LENNARD AG COMPANY,

Interveni ng Defendants

- Appellees

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of plaintiff/ counterdefendant

- appellant to

extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED

. The re ply submitted on September 13

, 2017 , is accepted for filing

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 17,325
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               1,700
<OTHER-SE>                             4,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       4,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (4,171)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          (4,171)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 Dated:
March 28, 2005
 By: /s/
Colin Dunn__________________
 Colin
Dunn, Vice President of Finance
```

Exhibit 10(h)ii

                                Final Agreement

This agreement is entered into this 5th of September 2002 by and among Huayang
International Holdings, Inc. (Buyer), a public held corporation organized in the
State of Nevada, and Mr. Zheng Hongwei (Seller), a citizen and resident of
China.

According to the 7/5/02 Acquisition Agreement between Huayang, Mr. Zheng and
Jaihe, Huayang will acquire all the Jaihe's stocks from Mr. Zheng. After signing
this Final Agreement, the acquisition will be completed. Huayang and Mr. Zheng
agreed as follows:

   A. Huayang will acquire Jaihe by giving Huayang's 1,900,000 shares of stocks
   B. Huayang will own 99% of Jaihe. The remaining 1% will belong to Haitong
   C. Huayang will acquire Jaihe's assets including land use right, Jaihe
      warehouse and approved GMP certificate. Although the value of the land
      use right, Jaihe's warehouse and GMP certificate haven't been recorded
      and included in the Jaihe's financial statements, they already belong to
      Jaihe. Mr. Zheng is responsible to complete all the legal procedures of
      transferring the name of the listed properties to Jaihe before 12/31/01
      or required timeline by Huayang.
   D. If Mr. Zheng can not complete the above legal procedures, Mr. Zheng
      agreed that Huayang can make necessary change of shares of stocks given
      to Mr. Zheng in exchange of Jaihe or withdraw from this acquisition
      agreement.
   E. After Mr. Zheng completes transferring and recording the value land use
      right, Jaihe warehouse and GMP certificate to Jaihe, it will adjust
      directly to Jaihe's assets and reserve fund. It should not create any
      liabilities between Huayang or Jaihe and Mr. Zheng.

Buyer: Huayang International Holdings, Inc.

Seller: Mr. Zheng Hongwei
```
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
  
 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 
  
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
  
 Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 1, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2004 (the “Executive Employment Agreement”), by and between Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (the
“Corporation”) and David S. Seltzer (the “Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Executive Employment Agreement. 
  
 WHEREAS, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Executive Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: 
  
 Section 1. Section 4.1. of the Executive Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words “Base Salary
equal to Three Hundred and Fifty Thousand ($350,000) Dollars” and substituting in lieu thereof the words “Base Salary equal to Three Hundred and Eighty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty-Four ($382,884) Dollars”. 
  
 Section 2. Except as modified by the Amendment No. 1, in all other respects
the Executive Employment Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Employment Agreement as of the date set forth above. 
  
  

			
	HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /S/    BERNARD SELTZER


	 	 	Bernard Seltzer
		
	 	 	 /S/    DAVID S. SELTZER


	 	 	David S. Seltzer
* Judge Motz did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2649

KENNETH T. BOSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. RIEPE; JOHN B. HOWARD; ADENA W.

TESTA; EDWARD H. BERGE; GAIL P. RIEPE; MICHAEL

DAVID TESTA; MELISSA L. BERGE; JAMES DORSEY

BROWN, III; CHRISTINE WEBER BROWN; WESTERN RUN

COMPANY, L.C.; COLD BOTTOM, L.L.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-1190-HAR)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ,* Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kenneth T. Bosley, Appellant Pro Se. John Henry Lewin, Jr.,

VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his claim under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West 1985 & Supp. 1995). We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny Appellees'

motion to dismiss the appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Bosley v. Riepe, No. CA-95-1190-HAR (D. Md. July

26, 1995). In light of this disposition, we deny Appellees' motion

to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT (99) REPORT OF DIAMOND, LEFTWICH, GOHEEN & DUNN




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT



To the Shareholders and the
Board of Directors of Twentieth Bancorp, Inc.
Huntington, West Virginia


     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TWENTIETH
BANCORP, INC. and its Subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

     We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Twentieth Bancorp, Inc. and its Subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and
the results of their consolidated operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

                                 /s/  DIAMOND, LEFTWICH, GOHEEN & DUNN

Huntington, West Virginia

February 12, 1996




                                       58
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for expedited security screenings for members of the Armed 

Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1801 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Risk-Based Security 

3 Screening for Members of the Armed Forces Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURITY SCREENING FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

5 ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 44903 of title 49, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(m) SECURITY SCREENING FOR MEMBERS OF THE

10 ARMED FORCES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Assistant Secretary 

12 shall develop and implement a plan to provide expe13 dited security screening services for a member of the 

14 Armed Forces, and any accompanying family mem15 ber, when the member of the Armed Forces presents 

16 documentation indicating official orders while in uni17 form through a primary airport (as defined by sec18 tion 47102 of this title). 

19 ‘‘(2) PROTOCOLS.—In developing the plan, the 

20 Assistant Secretary shall consider— 

21 ‘‘(A) leveraging existing security screening 

22 models used by airports and air carriers to re23 duce passenger wait times before entering a se24 curity screening checkpoint; 
3 

•HR 1801 EH

1 ‘‘(B) establishing standard guidelines for 

2 the screening of military uniform items, includ3 ing combat boots; and 

4 ‘‘(C) incorporating any new screening pro5 tocols into an existing trusted passenger pro6 gram, as established pursuant to section 

7 109(a)(3) of the Aviation and Transportation 

8 Security Act (Public Law 107–71; 115 Stat. 

9 613; 49 U.S.C. 114 note), or into the develop10 ment of any new credential or system that in11 corporates biometric technology and other appli12 cable technologies to verify the identity of indi13 viduals traveling in air transportation. 

14 ‘‘(3) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Assistant 

15 Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees 

16 of Congress a report on the implementation of the 

17 plan.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Not later than 180 days 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant 

20 Secretary shall implement the plan required by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide 

the Armed Forces. for expedited security screenings for members of
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 5, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Alain CouderAlain CouderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Joseph Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this Amendmentto Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Summer Infant, Inc.

 

2.Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report.

 
| April 30,  2009 | /s/  JOSEPH  DRISCOLL |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|
|                 |                            |
|                 | Joseph  Driscoll                |
| * *             | *Chief Financial Officer*       |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Innovative Coatings Corporation,
a Georgia corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of
his knowledge, that:

     1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company; and

     3.     The Company does not have a chief financial officer, and the
undersigned performs the functions of chief financial officer.

Date: November 19, 2002



/s/ Jerry Phillips
Jerry Phillips, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                                                                      
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                       11,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             1,272,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                295,000
<INVENTORY>                                 351,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,349,000
<PP&E>                                       59,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               59,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,736,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       634,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     61,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  975,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,736,000
<SALES>                                   5,842,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          5,842,000
<CGS>                                     3,718,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             4,146,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,022,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             62,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           12,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              90,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                (45,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                135,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
 OF
 ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION
 SUPERTEX,
INC.


Henry
C. Pao and John B, Goodrich certify that:


1.
They are the President and the Secretary, respectively, of Supertex,Inc., a
California corporation.
  2.
Article THIRD of the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is amended to
read as follows:


"THIRD:
The aggregate number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is
40,000,000 shares, consisting of two classes, namely 30,000,000 shares of Common
Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock.  The Preferred Stock
may be issued from time to time in one or more series.  Subject to the
provisions of the laws of the State of California and of this Article, the Board
of Directors is hereby authorized to determine and alter the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly
unissued series of Preferred Stock, the designation thereof and the number of
shares of Pre­ferred Stock constituting any such series; and to increase or
decrease the number of shares of Preferred Stock of any series subsequent to the
issuance of shares of that series, but not below the number of shares of such
series then outstanding. In case the shares of Preferred Stock of any series
shall be so decreased, the shares of Preferred Stock constituting such decrease
shall resume the status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolution,
originally determining the number of shares of Preferred Stock of such
series.
  "Upon
the filing of this Certificate of Amendment, each share of Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to such filing shall be converted and
reconstituted into 1.5 shares of Common Stock; provided, however, that any
fractional shares which would result from such conversion shall be purchased by
the corporation at their fair market value as of the date of filing of this
Certificate of Amendment.”


i





3.
The foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by
the Board of Directors.





4. The
foregoing amendment of Articles of Incorporation has
been duly approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance
with Section 902 of the Corporations Code.  The total number
of outstanding shares of the corporation is 6,736,510. The
number of shares voting in favor of the amendment exceeded the
vote required.  The percentage vote required was more than 50%.





The
undersigned declare under penalty of perjury that the matters set is to in the
foregoing certificate are true of their own know1edge.
  Executed
at Palo Alto, California, on September 30, 1983.


______________________
 Henry C.
Pao






ii