alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DENY; and Opinion Filed February 8, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00046-CV

IN RE MARK SCHWARZ, NEWCASTLE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

NEWCASTLE CAPITAL GROUP L.L.C., 

AND GEOWORKS CORPORATION, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-00144-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Brown

In this original proceeding, relators seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to 

vacate a September 25, 2018 order that vacated the associate judge’s protective order as to three 

recorded conversations relators maintain are privileged and contain trade secrets. To be entitled 

to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion 

and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 

135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have 

not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ 
–2–

of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court 

determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190046F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
THE AITORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

rnmld c. lhrn Auwr~~ ai. '~-EXAE 

*-mtNLI aaurr. 

lLrrb 14. 1939 

Net ti rabealll~trlet uhloh 

doe8mthave2o~igla8t 

Mlrol8eie8 but do.8 bmn 

eo 8eholmti88 by tlrtue 

%I118 pwtleulrr dwol dlBtrl8t Mm eoqtllod rlth 

ti1tb~l81t.8 f&W8t8t~~id,bUt8tdOcid i8kitl& 

rithbld Ui the p#ad thmt th. trartf 8&Oh8tiU8 the 

dhtriat lul 8re not ‘ml.&JhalL 88hOh8tia8. 

=?ublio 8ohool &ua of Tox88 1938 

-mder cbpter Nlamtom-c Nqual18atiar ?uad, II@- 

tiar4prwlde81 

bt~kUdtlndarth@~%8i#8 Oftht8 &t8h8n 

be diatrlauted in suoh g uy 8~ to M8%8t 811 8choo1 

dl8triet8 Of aat ?8uW tbVb -w (20) 88hOb8tioe, 

eta . 

%utloa 4 pw~lde8: 8tatea.U uad&provlmlon8 of 

thI8 bt 8-11 be dlQtt+d Vpon th8 bU18 Oi Qu tM8hW 

for my au&e of 8UhOlMtie8 fPaa tuenty (20) to thiefflin (35) . . : 
. . 

. . . . 

*X8 88ld Wk.81 4lmtrlrt entitled to Itate aid motrlthth8 hot it &#.a 8othavo tumtr ‘or4laal’ 

1*8, ht h.8 b8~O t-lltl 8@hOh8ti88? 

Prm~lq'i&h88~~~u~;,u8 rl8hto dtl8otMt 

8wtlraS ottho 

%8te*idWlldOrtbr)IwiBiOU O?thi8 bt8&ll 

bo (llrtrlbutod in Mah l way unto urirt all rohool 

lirtrptl of not liner that8 tuent~ (n0) Uholmt%e8 

l l . 

8@ Ot?Oll4 Oftk"Rtnl Aid kU"potik8t 

%ato aid mdor provl8lm8 of thl8 Ast rhall h 

alottodupe!tth8 )ui8 of anetouherior 

Y 

timb er l t 

88hOlUti88 ira tWntr (m) to thlx'tr-tire ( 5) urd 

(1) e4ditltmal~har fereaah aAditlo#mlthlrt~ 

fo) oeolutler,. . : 

kid 8Mtian fhtrtm mu: 

- bM18 tar UlieUtitiOtl @Ull k thr mt 

saholutlo 8muwrrtion of white or 801OP.d ?8ae, u 

th8 8UO v k, iaotUditk# the tPUi8fOl.8 bt0 th8 d18- 

trLet*. . . 

lb U’8 of th8 opinlsn thbt u a rrhool di8trict Y8tlm 

all of the other requlrment8 88 plrovldod by tho "Rur81t~~elaw , 

md at tha tln ha8 twenty (to) roholutlro, lmlud 

truuferod ia M thmo mumrated ia t& dirt-at, t 18 

entitle4 to rurkl aid.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-125694 on Form S-8 of our report dated June 21, 2023, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the PVH Associates Investment Plan for Residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for the year ended December 31, 2022.


/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC





Whippany, New Jersey





June 21, 2023
RESIGNATION OF


RESIGNATION OF

The Director, and CEO  

of 

TOKEN COMMUNITIES LTD.

 

 

The following is a true copy of the Director and Chief Executive Officer’s Resignation from the Corporation, held this 2nd day of April, 2019; 

 

          WHEREAS the undersigned was appointed as Director, Chief Executive of the Corporation and has served in said capacity to date, he has determined at this time to formally RESIGN these positions effective immediately. At the same time, he has been honored to have been offered, and ACCEPTED the position of CHIEF TECHNICAL OFFICER.  

 

By affixing, his signature hereto, officially as his last corporate act in said positions, DOES HEREBY RESIGN from the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Director. This Resignation is not the result of any dispute with management. 

 

The Board shall choose a new Chief Executive Officer at a time and place of its choosing.  

 

 

 

DATED:  2nd April, 2019

 

 

 

_____________________

Alexander Lightman, 

TOKEN COMMUNITIES LTD.
Exhibit 32.1   WINGS & THINGS, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wings & Things, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wings & Things, Inc.


|                       |                                                                                      
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2010 | /s/ Greg L. Popp
Greg L. Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation.

2

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2646

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Lillie B. Epps, also known *

as L. L., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

 ___________

Submitted: February 9, 2004 

 Filed: February 12, 2004 

___________

Before RILEY and RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and HOVLAND,1

District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lillie Epps (Epps) appeals the district court’s2

 revocation of her supervised

release from a drug conspiracy conviction, resulting in the imposition of a six-month
prison term followed by a four-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Epps

argues the court’s revocation of her supervised release was unreasonable.

When a district court imposes a revocation sentence within the statutory limits

of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), we will not reverse the sentence absent an abuse of

discretion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (“The [district] court may . . . revoke a term

of supervised release, and require the defendant to serve in prison all or part of the

term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in such

term of supervised release without credit for time previously served on postrelease

supervision, if the court, . . . finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the

defendant violated a condition of supervised release.”); United States v. Carothers,

337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2003) (“On appeal, the district court’s decision to

revoke supervised release based on its finding of a violation is reviewed only for

abuse of discretion.”) (citations omitted).

After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not

abuse its discretion. Epps’s sentence is within the statutory maximum allowed for

revocation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Moreover, Epps’s violations of the terms

of her supervised release, which included (1) testing positive for cocaine on one

occasion, and (2) missing eight substance abuse counseling sessions, and being out

of her residence without the permission of her probation officer, between January

and April 2003, provide ample support for the district court’s sentence. 

Accordingly, we affirm Epps’s sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Jones Lang
    
    
    
    Jones Lang LaSalleLaSalle
    
    
    
    2300 Geng Road Suite 100 Palo Alto CA 94303 
tel +1 650 815 2200 fax +1 650 815 2201
       1.
    
    The term of the Sublease shall be extended until July 31, 2011.
 All other terms of the Sublease shall remain the same.
 Acceptance
 Sublessor: Millipore Corporation
 By:
    
    /s/ Michael Gallano
    
    Date: 2/23/11
 Sublessee:      Anthera Corporation
 By:
    
    /s/ Chris Lowe
    
    Date: 1/12/11
#### Merrill Wheaton BECKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27791.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, eight years in the state penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Grace L. CARLTON, Appellant, v. Whitley CARLTON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 3, 1956.

Fred Lisanby, Georgetown, for appellant.

J. C. McKnight, Georgetown, L. M. Ack-man, Williamstown, for appellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The facts involved in this divorce action were discussed in an opinion we rendered on the original appeal. Carlton v. *920Carlton, Ky., 265 S.W.2d 477. Therein we held that the chancellor erred in denying Mrs. Carlton a divorce. We remanded the case to the circuit court with directions to grant Mrs. Carlton a divorce and alimony. However, we declined to pass upon the amount of alimony that should be awarded to Mrs. Carlton because that question was not directly before us for review.

Upon a reconsideration of the issues involved in this case, the chancellor granted Mrs. Carlton a divorce; awarded her alimony in the sum of $25 per month; allowed her attorney a fee of $500, and adjudged the costs of the action against Mr. Carlton. Mrs. Carlton has appealed from that part of the judgment fixing her alimony at $25 per month. She asserts that she is entitled to lump sum alimony in the sum of $15,000, the amount sought in her complaint.

At the time of the separation Mrs. Carlton was sixty-three and Mr. Carlton was sixty-one years of age. Each of them had been married previously.

Both parties had property at the time of their marriage. Mrs. Carlton owned a farm which she sold for $53;000 shortly after her marriage to Mr. Carlton. From this sum she paid a personal indebtedness of $14,075.61; divided $28,025 between seven of her eight children, and gave the eighth child her personal note for $6,000. Her remaining funds were invested in two houses, except $2,000 which was expended in helping to furnish and equip Mr. Carlton’s residence as a tourist home. Mr. Carlton has cash and government bonds amounting to approximately $12,000, a house and lot of the value of $15,000, and an automobile.

This unfortunate matrimonial adventure lasted less than two years. We will refrain from reciting the details of the events leading to their constant turbulence, except to observe the seriousness of one of their disputes. On this occasion a difficulty between them resulted in Mr. Carlton being fined, incarcerated, and placed under a bond to keep the peace.

We concede that under this record the chancellor was confronted with a perplexing problem in fixing a proper award of alimony to Mrs. Carlton. However, in cases of this character we favor an allowance of lump-sum alimony. Considering the age of the parties, their station in life, their financial condition and other such factors, we have concluded that an allowance to Mrs. Carlton of lump-sum alimony in the amount of $2,000 would be equitable.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to set it aside as far as alimony is. concerned, and to enter a judgment awarding Mrs. Carlton alimony in a lump sum of $2,000.
Exhibit 99.1

                                                       Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
[LOGO]                                                 One Home Campus
WELLS    HOME                                          Des Moines, IA 50328-0001
FARGO    MORTGAGE


February 24, 2006



Re: 2005 Annual Certification

We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge and belief that for the calendar
year of 2005:

      1.    All real estate taxes, bonds assessments and other lienable items
            have been paid.

      2.    All FHA mortgage insurance, private mortgage insurance premiums, and
            flood insurance have been paid (if applicable).

      3.    Hazard insurance policies held by us meet the requirements as
            specified in the servicing agreement, or those of a normal prudent
            lender if not specified, and those premiums due have been paid.

      4.    We have made all property inspections as required.

      5.    Fidelity bond and Errors and Omissions insurance coverage currently
            exists.

      6.    That the Officer signing this certificate has reviewed the
            activities and performance of the Servicer during the preceding
            fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
            Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer
            Guide or similar agreements and to the best of this officer's
            knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
            responsibilities or obligations of such agreement throughout the
            year, or if there has been a default or failure of the servicer to
            perform any of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a
            description of each default or failure and the nature and status
            thereof has been reported.


Sincerely,

/s/ John B. Brown

John B. Brown
Senior Vice President
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage


                                         Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
                                         is a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1871 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the extension 

of the tax collection period merely because the taxpayer is a member 

of the Armed Forces who is hospitalized as a result of combat zone 

injuries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2011 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent 

the extension of the tax collection period merely because 

the taxpayer is a member of the Armed Forces who 

is hospitalized as a result of combat zone injuries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wounded Warrior Tax 

5 Equity Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1871 IH

1 SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF EXTENSION OF TAX COLLECTION 

2 PERIOD FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES WHO ARE HOSPITALIZED AS A RE4 SULT OF COMBAT ZONE INJURIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7508(e) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) COLLECTION PERIOD AFTER ASSESSMENT

9 NOT EXTENDED AS A RESULT OF HOSPITALIZA10 TION.—With respect to any period of continuous 

11 qualified hospitalization described in subsection (a) 

12 and the next 180 days thereafter, subsection (a) 

13 shall not apply in the application of section 6502.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxes assessed before, on, or 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              DATAMILL MEDIA CORP.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Datamill Media Corp. ("Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Vincent Beatty, Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 16, 2011                      /s/ Vincent Beatty
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Vincent Beatty
                                      Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
#### The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. Albert O’NEAL and Albert O’Neal, Administrator, etc., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 3, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 1955.

Malcolm Y. Marshall, T. M. Galphin, Jr., Ogden, Galphin & Abell, Louisville, W. D. Gilliam, Scottsville, for appellant.

*784Coleman, Harlin & Orendorf, Robert M. Coleman-, Bowling Green, N.'F. Harper, Scottsville; for appellees;

PER CURIAM.

We- are affirming the judgment in this case for $1,200 for the loss of • a hous.e' because we think there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury on the question .whether there was a “direct, loss by windstorm,” within the meaning of a provision in an insurance policy.

The motion for -an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 3.2

AQUA AMERICA, INC.AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

﻿

THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of February 3, 2020, is made to the Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) of Aqua America, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”).  

﻿

RECITALS

﻿

WHEREAS, Section 8.08 and Section 4.11(b) of the Bylaws provide that the Bylaws may be amended by the Company's Board of Directors (the “Board”) with respect to those matters that are not by statute committed expressly to the shareholders; and

﻿

WHEREAS, the relevant provisions Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as amended, (the “BCL”), including Section 1504, do not commit amendments to reflect a corporate name change expressly to the shareholders of the corporation.

﻿

AMENDMENT

﻿

NOW THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Bylaws as follows:

﻿

1.Amendment to Bylaws

﻿

The Bylaws shall be amended to reflect the name change of the Company by replacing each reference therein to “Aqua America, Inc.” with “Essential Utilities, Inc.”

﻿

2.Ratification.  Except as specifically set forth herein, the Bylaws shall continue in full force and effect.

﻿

FILED with the undersigned as Secretary of the Company this 3rd day of February,  2020.

﻿

| ﻿ |   |                                                          |
|----------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| ﻿ |   | /s/ Christopher P. Luning                                     |
| ﻿ |   | Christopher P. Luning                                         |
| ﻿ |   | Executive Vice President, General Counsel

and Secretary |

﻿

----
#### Helen GONZALES, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 27429.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1955.

John J. Herrera, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the second offense of keeping a bawdy house; the punishment, 40 days in jail and a fine of $400.

Appellant has now filed her personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Equity
Properties, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gene S. Bertcher, Vice President, Treasurer,
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/S/    GENE S.
BERTCHERGene S. Bertcher Vice President & Treasurer (Acting Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHRISTINE M. THIERRY,

Petitioner

v.

ANN YAMULLA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 183 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 9, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Alain Couder

Alain CouderPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)