alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1824 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1824

   To amend title 49, United States Code, to make modifications with 
   respect to the board of directors of the Metropolitan Washington 
              Airports Authority, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2011

   Mr. Wolf introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 49, United States Code, to make modifications with 
   respect to the board of directors of the Metropolitan Washington 
              Airports Authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS 
              AUTHORITY.

    (a) Membership.--Section 49106(c)(1) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking 
        ``13 members'' and inserting ``17 members''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``5 members'' and 
        inserting ``9 members''.
    (b) Term.--Section 49106(c)(3) of such title is amended by striking 
the second sentence and inserting the following: ``A member may not 
serve after the expiration of the member's term.''.
    (c) Removal Authority.--Section 49106(c) of such title is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6) by striking subparagraph (C);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
    ``(7)(A) A member of the board appointed under paragraph (1)(A) 
shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor of Virginia.
    ``(B) A member of the board appointed under paragraph (1)(B) shall 
serve at the pleasure of the Mayor of the District of Columbia.
    ``(C) A member of the board appointed under paragraph (1)(C) shall 
serve at the pleasure of the Governor of Maryland.
    ``(D) A member of the board appointed under paragraph (1)(D) shall 
serve at the pleasure of the President.''.
    (d) Approval of Bond Issues and Annual Budget.--Section 49106(c)(8) 
(as redesignated by subsection (c)(2) of this section) is amended by 
striking ``Eight votes'' and inserting ``Nine votes''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1740 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of Illabot 

Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

4 SEGMENTS. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(ll) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1740 IH

1 ‘‘(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the 

2 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the northern ter3 minus as generally depicted on the map titled 

4 ‘Illabot Creek Proposed WSR–Northern Ter5 minus’, dated September 15, 2009, to be ad6 ministered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 

7 follows: 

8 ‘‘(i) The 4.3-mile segment from the 

9 headwaters of Illabot Creek to the bound10 ary of Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a 

11 wild river. 

12 ‘‘(ii) The 10-mile segment from the 

13 boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to 

14 the northern terminus as generally de15 picted on the map titled ‘Illabot Creek 

16 Proposed WSR–Northern Terminus’, dated 

17 September 15, 2009, as a recreational 

18 river. 

19 ‘‘(B) Action required to be taken under 

20 subsection (d)(1) for the river segments des21 ignated under this paragraph shall be com22 pleted through revision of the Skagit Wild and 

23 Scenic River comprehensive management 

24 plan.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1






                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-50823 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 
2-88353 both on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement Nos. 2-88352,
33-40316, 33-45615, 33-53260, 33-50815, 33-52039, 33-60915 and 33-60921 
on Form S-8 of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1996
(February 27, 1996 as to Note 15), appearing in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 19, 1996
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

VINCENT SICILIA

v.

API ROOFERS ADVANTAGE PROGRAM 

(WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD)

PETITION OF: API ROOFERS 

ADVANTAGE PROGRAM

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 287 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Did the Commonwealth Court impermissibly expand the holdings in Duffey v. 

WCAB (Trola-Dyne, Inc.), 152 A.3d 984 (Pa. 2017) . . . as to usurp the authority 

of the Workers’ Compensation Judge to determine the nature and extent of the 

compensable injury?

(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the Workers’ Compensation 

Appeal Board by substituting [its] assessment of the credible testimony for that 

of the fact finder?
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 117 ) ll-E-7 7 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 117 of 264P. 2

.'•. i » »

Date : From : To : Subject : 

# q7/0-&^/ MEMORANDU M 3Z~£-rl7 0937 , 10/24/9 6 Gar yRodger

s * Kenneth R

. Meardon , Pacifi c Enviommenta l Service s Contac t report , EP

A contro l #97185-C18-0 1 Re : descriptio n o

f laminatio n proces s Whe n w e wer e discussin g th e process , I sai d tha t th e resi n use d ha d approximatel y 60 % filler . Yo u stat e tha t th e 'process ' use s 60 % filler : Thi s i s no

t correct . Th e resi n tha t i s used has a fille r conten t o f 60% . Th e tota l resi n conten t i n th e pane l i s approximatel y 12% , leavin g a pane l solid s conten t o

f 78% . Pleas e mak

e th e abov

e corrections . Regards , 

# A** Gar y Rodger sP. 3

Docket No . A-94-5 2 Categor y II- E The following information i s locate din th e confidentia l file s of th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Office of Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an

dStandards , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Research Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia

l pendin g final determinatio n by th e Administrator an di s not availabl e fo

r publi c inspection . Unite dPanel Inc. , Mt . Bethel , P A - epontaot

repor t fromK . Meardon , PES , t o G . Rogers , UPI , date d1/1/9 6 1 p . 1 diskett e



## P

# ^ 

# |\ j 5^ - K



# •z

-
Exhibit            23

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

 

We            hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form            S-3 (No. 333-121857) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-93697 and 333-93695) of QMed, Inc. of our            report dated March 25, 2008, which contains a  explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern relating to the consolidated financial statements,             which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/            Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.

 

Edison,            New Jersey

March            25, 2008
# Gazzetta ufficiale L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0707 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | L 66 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Legislazione | 61° anno8 marzo 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0707

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

L 66

Edizione in lingua italiana

Legislazione

61° anno8 marzo 2018

---

| Sommario | | Rettifiche | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rettifica del regolamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 28 febbraio 2018, recante misure volte a impedire i blocchi geografici ingiustificati e altre forme di discriminazione basate sulla nazionalità, sul luogo di residenza o sul luogo di stabilimento dei clienti nell'ambito del mercato interno e che modifica i regolamenti (CE) n. 2006/2004 e (UE) 2017/2394 e la direttiva 2009/22/CE ( GU L 60 I del 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Sommario

Rettifiche

pagina

*

Rettifica del regolamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 28 febbraio 2018, recante misure volte a impedire i blocchi geografici ingiustificati e altre forme di discriminazione basate sulla nazionalità, sul luogo di residenza o sul luogo di stabilimento dei clienti nell'ambito del mercato interno e che modifica i regolamenti (CE) n. 2006/2004 e (UE) 2017/2394 e la direttiva 2009/22/CE ( GU L 60 I del 2.3.2018 )

( GU L 60 I del 2.3.2018 )

1

| IT | Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.
  I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco. |
| --- | --- |

IT

Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.

I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco.

---

Rettifiche

| 8.3.2018 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

L 66/1

---

Rettifica del regolamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 28 febbraio 2018, recante misure volte a impedire i blocchi geografici ingiustificati e altre forme di discriminazione basate sulla nazionalità, sul luogo di residenza o sul luogo di stabilimento dei clienti nell'ambito del mercato interno e che modifica i regolamenti (CE) n. 2006/2004 e (UE) 2017/2394 e la direttiva 2009/22/CE

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea L 60 I del 2 marzo 2018
  )

Pagina 14, nella formula conclusiva:

Pagina 14, nella formula conclusiva

anziché:

«
  Per il Parlamento europeo

La presidente

L. PAVLOVA

Per il Consiglio

Il presidente

A. TAJANI
  »

leggasi:

«
  Per il Parlamento europeo

Il presidente

A. TAJANI

Per il Consiglio

La presidente

L. PAVLOVA
  ».

---
#### Delbert Calvin POPE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28071.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 120 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no state-mént of facts or bills óf exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Howard CARTER, Appellant, v. Lelia SPURLOCK et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 7, 1955.

*839John S. Deering, Nicholasville, for appellant.

William H. Mackey, William B. Buford, Nicholasville, for appellees. ■

CLAY, Commissioner.

This suit was brought by appellees to set aside a deed and to have the appellant grantee declared a trustee. The' court adjudged that the appellant convey a'one-third undivided interest in the land to each of the appellees and that he account to them ás trustee.

The judgment was entered on November 17,1953, and' no appeal was taken. : On June 29, 1954, appellant filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Apparently this motion was made under CR 60.02, and it was overruled.

About three years prior to his death, the father of appellant and appellees conveyed to the former a forty acre farm. On the day this deed was executed appellant entered into a written contract with his father whereby appellant agreed, upon his father’s death, to make a settlement with his two sisters, the appellees, appellant to be repaid any expenses incurred with respect to the property conveyed. There was evidence that about a year after the execution of the agreement the grantor destroyed the original writing and expressed an intention to revoke it. Other evidence justified the Chancellor in finding that an irrevocable trust had been created and that appellant should be required to reconvey a one-third undivided interest to each of his two sisters and to render an accounting.

The only ■ question presented is whether or not on appellant’s motion for a new trial he made a sufficient showing to justify setting aside the original judgment. The alleged newly discovered evidence consisted of the testimony of the attorney who had drawn the deed and the contract to the effect that the grantor had come into his office a y.ear later, expressed the intention of revoking the agreement, and had crossed out the signatures thereto on the attorney’s copy. The other newly discovered evidence was ^ the • testimony of two doctors who *840, would state that the grantor was mentally competent when he executed the deed and the agreement, which was an issue in the controversy.

Appellant failed to show the exercise of due diligence to discover this evidence. Of more significance, however, is the fact that this new evidence was not of such character as would make reasonably certain a different judgment. See Durbin v. Nally, Ballard, and Saltsman, Inc., Ky., 279 S.W.2d 18. The attempted revocation of the agreement which created a trust, about which the attorney would testify, was ineffective without the consent of the appellee beneficiaries. Hinton’s. Ex’r v. Hinton’s Committee, 256 Ky. 345, 76 S.W.2d 8. The. new proof of the grantor’s competency could avail appellant nothing because it would only fortify the conclusion that the grantor was bound by the trust agreement which the judgment enforced.

The Chancellor properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Parts 614 and 620
          - RIN 3052-AD54

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# ACTION:

Notification of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

The Farm Credit Administration (FCA, we, or our) issued a final rule amending our regulations governing young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers (YBS).

# DATES:

The final rule was published on December 27, 2023 (88 FR 89280), and is effective as of February 14, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*Technical information:*                         Jessica Tomlinson-Potter, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, (703) 819-4667, TTY (703) 883-4056,                         *potterj@fca.gov.*

or

*Legal information:*                         Hazem Isawi, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, (703) 883-4022, TTY (703) 883-4056,                         *isawih@fca.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 12, 2023, FCA issued a final rule amending our regulations at 12 CFR parts 614 and 620 governing service to YBS. The final rule clarifies the responsibilities of funding banks in the review and approval of direct lender association YBS programs, strengthens funding bank internal controls, and bolsters YBS business planning.

                    In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252(c)(1), the effective date of the rule is no earlier than 30 days from the date of publication in the                     **Federal Register**                     during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is February 14, 2024.                

Dated: February 21, 2024.

Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board, Farm Credit Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-03870 Filed 2-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4201

___________ Bobbi Michelle Bruns, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Leech Lake Reservation Housing * Authority, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States Leech Lake RTC Members, in their * District Court for the official capacity; IHA Board of * District of Minnesota. Commissioners; Martin Jennings; * [UNPUBLISHED] Rocky Papsadora; Eli Hunt; Daniel * Brown; Myron Ellis; Jack Seelye; * Alfred Fairbanks; Sidney Jones; * Kenneth Brown; Lillian Reese; * Delores Larson; Esther Bogda; * Mary Bebeau; Leech Lake * Reservation Tribal Council, * * Defendants. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 1998 Filed: April 14, 1998

___________The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommend ations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bobbi Michelle Bruns appeals the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject 1 matter jurisdiction her claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. After a careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 187

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Amy Lynn Woodruff, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210026

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable Bobbi Brown Weiler, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Anna A. Argenti, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Dominic Davis, third-year law 

student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 

Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

OCTOBER 14, 2021 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

State v. Woodruff

No. 20210026

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Amy Lynn Woodruff appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a 

jury found her guilty of preventing arrest. Woodruff argues the evidence at trial 

was insufficient to support her conviction, because the force required to remove 

Woodruff from her vehicle was not “substantial force” as required by N.D.C.C. 

§ 12.1-08-02(1). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, 

we conclude substantial evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a 

reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
Revisions to Section III of SO2 preamble

Lydia Wegman 

to: 

Laity, James A., Mancini, Dominic J. 

06/02/2010 02:26 PM 

Cc: 

James Hemby, Richard Wayland, Kevin McLean, Sara Schneeberg, Mike Thrift, Scott Jenkins, 

crabtree.tricia, Charlotte Bertrand, Bridgid Curry, Lydia Wegman 

Show Details 

Jim and Dom, 

Attached is a redline/strikeout version of section III of the preamble that includes the language we agreed to this 

morning: two additions at the end of the document and an added footnote on page 7. We have also incorporated 

Jim's comments from last week consistent with our agreement to take public comment on the modeling and 

implementation guidance. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks. 

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\tcrabtre\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4229.htm 6/2/2010
EXHIBIT 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly report of Lion Capital Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy T. Page,  Chief  Executive
Officer  and Chairman  of the Board of Directors  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                           /s/ Timothy T. Page
                           ------------------------------------------------
                           Timothy T. Page
                           Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
                           Board of Directors
                           Date: November 14, 2005
#### Paul CONTI and Conti Corporation, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 02-779.

Supreme Court of United States

Jan. 13, 2003.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Steven Wallace Hopkins v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00221

- CR

Trial court case number: 1518270

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting that this court dismiss his appointed

appellate counsel and appoint new counsel. The motion is denied . The relief requested by

appellant must be directed to the trial court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Gordon Goodman

___

Acting individually

Date: ___ July 2, 2019

__