alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634

)

Under Contract No. FA8903

- 04

- D

- 8703 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Raymond F. Monroe, Esq.

Cameron S. Hamrick, Esq.

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Washington, D.C.

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant

, Esq.

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Lori R. Shapiro, Esq.

William M. Lackermann

, Jr., Esq.

Christopher M. Judge

- Hilborn, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CLARKE

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board ’ s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) , and the

parties ’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $1,200,000

. Appellant has agreed to waive Contract Disputes Act interest.

Dated: May 2 1 , 2021

C RAIG S. CLARKE

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

J. REID PROUTY

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58634

, Appeal of Parsons

Evergreene, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s Charter.

Dated: May 21, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 194 

For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. PASTOR of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Martha Palmillas de Morales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARTHA 

4 PALMILLAS DE MORALES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Martha Palmillas de Morales shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 194 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Martha Palmillas 

2 de Morales enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Martha Palmillas de Morales, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 194 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Martha Palmillas de Mo2 rales shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 

3 any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Hagen CARTER, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27921.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1956.

J. W. Reid, Abilene, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Taylor County; the punishment, a fine of $1,000 and six months in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino-Biotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Sole Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino-Biotics, Inc., and will be retained by Sino-Biotics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    /s/   David Lennox David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Sole Director   Date:  August 10, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 12, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11234 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MELVIN R. HASSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-312-ALL-G

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Melvin R. Hassell appeals from his criminal contempt conviction and sentence imposed in a bench proceeding for violating the district court’s order not to interfere in a tax sale of his property. Hassell argues that the district court retaliated against him for exercising his constitutional rights, lacked subject matter jurisdiction, conspired with a Department of Justice attorney, and denied him a jury trial. The Government moves to dismiss the appeal as frivolous.No. 04-11234 -2- A conviction for criminal contempt is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of 1) a reasonably specific order; 2) violation of the order; and 3) the willful intent to violate the order. United States v. Landerman , 109 F.3d 1053, 1068 (5th Cir.), modified in part on other grounds , 116 F.3d 119 (5th Cir. 1997). A criminal contempt need not be charged by indictment. See United States v. Nunn , 622 F.2d 802, 803-04 (5th Cir. 1980) ; F ED . R. C RIM . P. 42(a). Further, a jury is required only if the contempt action carries a penalty of more than six months of imprisonment. See National Maritime Union v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp. , 737 F.2d 1395, 1400 (5th Cir. 1984). We conclude that Hassell was given proper notice of the contempt proceeding and that the district court’s finding of guilt was not erroneous. Hassell’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, the Government’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARY OF THE COMPANY

                            BIOMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  Jurisdiction             Percentage of
                                    in which             Voting Securities
     Name                         Incorporated            Owned by Parent
<S>                               <C>                         <C>

Biomagnetic Technologies GmbH (A)  Germany                     100%
</TABLE>

     (A)  The subsidiary changed its name in October 1991.  It was formerly
          known as S.H.E. Kryotechnische Instrumente und Systeme GmbH.
          Substantially all assets and liabilities of the subsidiary  were
          transferred to Biomagnetic Technologies, Niedelassung, a branch of
          Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. on October 1, 1997.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40588

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL DELEON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-95-CR-24-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 14, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raul DeLeon appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to

suppress evidence seized by State Trooper Oscar Cruz during an

investigatory traffic stop. DeLeon contends that Cruz had no objective

reason to stop him because, under Texas law, the display of a partially torn temporary "buyer’s"

license tag is not illegal and does not give rise to a reasonable suspicion that he was in violation of

any law. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities
No. 95-40588

- 2 -

convince us that the district court committed no reversible

error. Cruz was justified in stopping DeLeon to investigate the

validity of his temporary license tag. See Green v. State, 866 S.W.2d

701, 703 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993); Kennedy v. State, 847 S.W.2d 635, 636 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993). 

DeLeon’s arguments that the district court erred in denying his motion to

suppress because his detention subsequent to the initial

investigation exceeded the scope and purpose of the initial stop

and that he did not give voluntary consent to the search do not

show that the district court committed plain error. United States v.

Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993)), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995); United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).

AFFIRMED.
[TRINITY LETTERHEAD]


                                                                November 6, 2000

To:      Subscribers of the June 2000 Private
         Placement of Securities of Trinity Medical Group USA, Inc.


         We are  pleased  to inform  you that on October  20,  2000,  we filed a
registration  statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
to register the shares of common stock of the Company  that you  subscribed  for
through our June 2000 private placement.  The number of shares registered on the
registration  statement  reflects  the number of shares  underlying  each common
stock unit,  with each common  stock unit  consisting  of 1,000 shares of common
stock,  par value $.001 (the "Common  Stock"),  and a warrant to purchase  1,000
shares  of  Common  Stock,  with an  exercise  price of  $4.00  per  share  (the
"Warrant").

         You  will  note  that  the   Private   Placement   Memorandum   ("PPM")
inadvertently  referred to preferred  series A stock rather than to common stock
units.  Instead of  referring  to each unit of  preferred  series A stock  being
ultimately  convertible into 1,000 shares of Common Stock and a Warrant, the PPM
should  have  referred to common  stock  units  because the Company did not have
preferred shares authorized. Since there is no change in the amount of shares of
Common Stock to be issued,  you are entitled to 1,000 shares of Common Stock and
a Warrant for each unit you purchased.

         Our records show that we have not issued you the shares of Common Stock
and a Warrant underlying the common stock units. Accordingly, we have instructed
our transfer agent to issue a stock  certificate for your shares of Common Stock
and we will deliver the stock  certificate  and your Warrant to you upon receipt
from the transfer agent.

         Please  acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing in the
space below and faxing a signed copy to the undersigned at 415-256-1994 as soon
as possible, so we may expedite the issuance of your Common Stock and Warrant.

         We thank you for your continued support of the Company. If you have any
questions  regarding the shares of Common Stock to be issued to you, please feel
free to call me.

                                              Very truly yours,

                                              Trinity Medical Group USA, Inc.


                                              By: /s/ James S. Namnath
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Name: James S. Namnath
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer

Agreed and Acknowledged:

By:
   --------------------------
Name:
     ------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Kass, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Steven Kass *
-----------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 30, 2007

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         269,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               388,225
<PP&E>                                       2,420,622
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,524,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,284,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,284,216
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               530,386
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   371,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

13967 

Federal Register 

Vol. 89, No. 37 

Friday, February 23, 2024 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of February 21, 2024 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels 

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared 

to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations 

caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government 

of two unarmed, United States-registered civilian aircraft in international 

airspace north of Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the 

national emergency was expanded to deny monetary and material support 

to the Cuban government. On February 24, 2016, by Proclamation 9398, 

and on February 22, 2018, by Proclamation 9699, the national emergency 

was further modified based on continued disturbances or threatened disturbances of the international relations of the United States related to Cuba. 

The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the 

use of excessive force against United States vessels or aircraft that may 

engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba. 

Further, the unauthorized entry of any United States-registered vessel into 

Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy 

of the United States because such entry could facilitate a mass migration 

from Cuba. It continues to be United States policy that a mass migration 

from Cuba would endanger United States national security by posing a 

disturbance or threatened disturbance of the international relations of the 

United States. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect 

to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867, as amended 

by Proclamation 7757, Proclamation 9398, and Proclamation 9699. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0
13968 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2024 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 21, 2024. [FR Doc. 2024–03937 

Filed 2–22–24; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
| Delaware                                             | 001-07572                | 13-1166910                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York               | 10016                    |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)             |  (Zip Code)         |

----

|                | For        | Against   | Abstain | Broker Non-Vote |
|---------------------|------------|-----------|---------|-----------------|
| Mary Baglivo        | 72,247,922 | 31,548    | 81,812  | 1,678,141       |
| Brent Callinicos    | 72,258,269 | 17,726    | 85,287  | 1,678,141       |
| Emanuel Chirico     | 71,156,054 | 1,000,203 | 205,025 | 1,678,141       |
| Juan R. Figuereo    | 71,737,729 | 539,278   | 84,275  | 1,678,141       |
| Joseph B. Fuller    | 71,264,543 | 1,012,017 | 84,722  | 1,678,141       |
| Fred Gehring        | 71,852,851 | 416,790   | 91,641  | 1,678,141       |
| Bruce Maggin        | 71,042,451 | 1,235,750 | 83,081  | 1,678,141       |
| V. James Marino     | 71,661,658 | 615,527   | 84,097  | 1,678,141       |
| Henry Nasella       | 71,572,105 | 706,307   | 82,870  | 1,678,141       |
| Edward R. Rosenfeld | 72,257,670 | 20,968    | 82,644  | 1,678,141       |
| Rita M. Rodriguez   | 71,854,815 | 424,190   | 82,277  | 1,678,141       |
| Craig Rydin         | 72,241,658 | 34,376    | 85,248  | 1,678,141       |

----

|   | PVH CORP.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | By:  /s/ Mark D. Fischer                                            |
|   | Mark D. Fischer, Executive Vice President                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |