alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS HJIJ



### WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SCHUMAN AVIATION, LTD 

### FAADOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0778
HEARING NOTICE 

### NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENthat testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on April 22 and 23, 2013, 

### inclusive, in the U.S. District Court, District ofHawaii 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, Hawaii 968501. 

### Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docketuntil the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings2 

### may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service3

.



### Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1 As ofthe date ofthis notice a courtroom has notbeen assigned. Parties should check the Court Calendar the day ofthe hearing for the exactcourtroom. The parties may also check with the Clerk's Office. 2 Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (exceptfor materials which are sealed) also available for viewing at**b.!JP-;!fw.w.~,r..?gy1gf.!QIJ§.$.Q.Y.:..** For additional information see:**b.t!P../!4m.~-J!.QtgQY...** . 3 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions, the Rules ofPractice, as well as othermaterials relating to civilpenalty cases, are available on the internetat: http:llwww.(aa.gov/aboutloffice orglheadquarters oflices!agclpol adjudicationlagc400/civil penalty/; see also: http:l!ecft.gpoaccess.gov/cgilt!textltext-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=lec(rbrowse/Title14/14tab 02. tpl. In addition, Thomson Reuters/WestPublishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available throughLEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9F1RAN-FAA database. For additional information, see the Web site.FDMS No. FAA-2012-0778 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration· 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Christopher D. Ferrara, 

### Respondent's Counsel 841 Bishop Street, Suite 1628 Honolulu, HI 96813 FAX: 808-537-4576 President Schuman Aviation, Ltd. 130 Iolana Place Honolulu, HI 96819 DonBobertz, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kuldip C. Baid, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                               /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
                                ------------------------
                                 Kuldip C. Baid
                                Chief Financial Officer
                               September 12, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Michael J. Borman,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AvocentCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Avocent Corporation.

 
| Date:     November 5,  2008 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      |   |
|                                                      | By:    | /s/Michael J. Borman |
|                                                      | Name:  | Michael J. Borman |
|                                                      | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                           |        |  |  |

 

I, Edward H. Blankenship,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AvocentCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Avocent Corporation.

 
| Date:     November 5,  2008 |                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                                      |                |
|                                                      | By:                 | /s/ Edward H.  Blankenship |
|                                                      | Name:               | Edward H. Blankenship |
|                                                      | Title:              | Senior Vice President  of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and |
|                                                      | Assistant Secretary |
|                                                           |                     |  |  |

 

----
RTI in General 

Research Triangle Institute (RTI) International is a research institute, dedicated to improving the 

human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff provide research and technical 

expertise to governments and businesses in more than 75 countries in the areas of health and 

pharmaceuticals, education and training, surveys and statistics, advanced technology, 

international development, economic and social policy, energy and the environment, and 

laboratory and chemistry services. 

Specific to Breda Munoz and Gabrielle Raymond 

RTI assists international and U.S. governments in developing air pollution regulations to 

improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. RTI’s program design and 

regulatory development support includes information gathering and compilation and analysis of 

unit-level emissions data. Once the emissions data have been collected, RTI typically supports 

the EPA in one of the most important steps in the rulemaking process: the selection of 

appropriate technology-based emission limits. There are several aspects of emissions data that 

should be considered in arriving at an emissions limit, including the size of the data set, the 

presence of outliers, the data distribution (e.g., normal versus log-normal), and the degree of 

variability present in the data. In the case where the emission limits must reflect maximum 

achievable control technology, RTI’s statisticians and environmental engineers have developed 

Microsoft Excel templates that have helped the EPA standardize the process by which they 

calculate emission limits. Using the R Project for Statistical Computing, ProUCL, and Microsoft 

Excel, the RTI-developed templates test the data set for outliers, how the data are distributed, and 

calculates an upper prediction limit (UPL). These statistical templates have been applied on 

nearly all recent rulemakings in which the EPA has set technology-based emission limits, 

including Brick and Structural Clay Products, Clay Ceramics, Mineral Wool, Wool Fiberglass, 

Primary Aluminum, Portland Cement, and Mercury Air Toxics Standards for Utilities. RTI has 

also given a presentation to the EPA SPPD staff during their rule training on the development of 

maximum achievable control technology emission limits and how to use the Microsoft Excel 

UPL templates to calculate emission limits.
#### Joe WALSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27329.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $75.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term is suspended.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for suspension and, as reformed, is affirmed.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

JAN 2 B 2015 

Mr. Brian Richardet 

Cessna Aircraft Company 

One Cessna Boulevard 

PO Box 7704 

Wichita, Kansas 67277-7704 

Dear Mr. Richardet: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated January 21,2015, requesting partial relief from 

§ 25.809(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This exemption, if granted, would 

provide relief from the requirement for a means to permit viewing of the likely areas of 

evacuee ground contact prior to opening the type III overwing exit on Cessna Model 680A 

airplanes. 

This request was submitted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket 

Management System (at Regulations.gov) on January 23, 2015, and has been assigned 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0157. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will 

contact you if we need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. Alan Sinclair at (425) 227-2195, or by e-mail at Alan.Sinclair@faa.gov. 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

COPY 

OF ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT 32.1

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2006

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, hereby certifies that: (i) the Annual Report of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on Form 10-K with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 2, 2007



/s/ THOMAS R. MCGUIREThomas R. McGuire,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In Re: SHAHZAD KHALIGH, 

Debtor.

No. 06-55361

SHAHZAD KHALIGH, BAP No.  Appellant, CC-05-01148-KPaB

v. ORDER

FRED HADAEGH,

Appellee. 

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Klein, Pappas, and Brandt, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2007*

Pasadena, California

Filed November 8, 2007

Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez and Kim McLane Wardlaw,

Circuit Judges, and Raner C. Collins,** District Judge.

COUNSEL

Simon J. Dunstan, Hughes & Dunstan, LLP, Woodland Hills,

California, for the appellant. 

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without

oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

**The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the

District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 

14673
Paul A. Beck, Law Offices of Paul A. Beck, Sherman Oaks,

California, for the appellee.

ORDER

Shahzad Khaligh appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel, which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s determination that Fred Hadaegh’s award of damages obtained

against her was not dischargeable. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).

She argues that mutual collateral estoppel is not available in

California when the prior determination was made in a confirmed arbitration award decision. 

We disagree and, therefore, affirm for the reasons cogently

set forth in the majority opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel. See Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In re Khaligh), 338 B.R. 817

(B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2006). 

AFFIRMED. 

14674 IN RE: KHALIGH

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2007 Thomson/West.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134061 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134061 

 COA: 274379 

Oakland CC: 2000-170464-FC 

CARL ANTHONY STEPHENS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1852 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1852

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for 
      graduate medical education programs in children's hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Hospital GME Support 
Reauthorization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS THAT OPERATE 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 256e) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``through 2005 and each 
        of fiscal years 2007 through 2011'' and inserting ``through 
        2016'';
            (2) in subsection (f)(1)(A)(iv), by striking ``2011'' and 
        inserting ``2016''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)(2)(D), by striking ``2011'' and 
        inserting ``2016''.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Section 340E(b)(3)(D) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e(b)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``Not 
later than the end of fiscal year 2011'' and inserting ``Not later than 
the end of fiscal year 2015''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1852

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for 
      graduate medical education programs in children's hospitals.
```
#### George Resley BARTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27785.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is unlawfully driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the punishment, a fine of $75 and confinement in the county jail for three days.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2006, asamended, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Sign:                                  | /S/ | Richard A. Smith |   |
|----------------------------------------|-----|------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| November 13,  2006                     |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of thisReport or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2(1)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael T. Everett, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/  MICHAEL T. EVERETT
-----------------------
Michael T. Everett
Chief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 was provided to WebEx Communications, Inc. and will be
retained by WebEx Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


-----------------------------------
(1)  This statement is submitted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of that section.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. B.Harris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB/A of Sales  Strategies,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 22, 2003                /s/ R. B. Harris
                                        -------------------------------
                                        R. B. Harris
                                        President/ CEO/Director