alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

# **Certifications**

 

I, Geoffrey M. Boyd, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EschelonTelecom, Inc.,

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of a annual report) that has materially affected, orreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | August 11, 2004    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | Sign:                   |   /S/       Geoffrey M.  Boyd |   |
|   | Geoffrey M. Boyd        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.4
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AND RETENTION AGREEMENT
 Catherine Hunt Rundle
      1.
    
    Section 1.5 (Definition of Good Reason) is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
      2.
    
    Section 3.1 (Termination of Employment without Cause) is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following in lieu thereof:
 Termination of Employment Without Cause or Upon Death




---



##### 



3.
    
    Section 3.2 (Release) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Release
 4.
    
    The Agreement is hereby amended to add the following Section 3.3 thereto:
  5.
    
    Section 4.1(d) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereto:
  6.
    
    Section 4.2.1 (Stock Acceleration) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following in lieu thereof:
 Stock Acceleration




---



##### 



7.
    
    Section 4.2.2 (Compensation) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following in lieu thereof:
 Compensation
 Termination Upon Death, Without Cause or for Good Reason
   Resignation Without Good Reason or Disability
 8.
    
    Section 4.3(d) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following in
lieu thereof:




---



##### 



9.
    
    Section 4.4 (Payments subject to 409A) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following in lieu thereof:
 Release
 10.
    
    The Agreement is hereby amended to add the following Section 4.5 thereto:
  11.
    
    Sections 5.1 (Settlement of Disputes) is hereby amended by replacing the reference to
Section 4 with Sections 3 and 4.
 12.
    
    Section 5.2 (Expenses) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following in lieu thereof:
 Expenses provided that
 13.
    
    Section 5.3 (Compensation During a Dispute) is hereby amended by (i) deleting the
words If theat the beginning thereto and replacing such language with the following:
Subject to any limitations under Section 409A, if
the.
 14.
    
    Section 8.4 (Exclusive Severance Benefits) is hereby amended by replacing the
reference to employment without in the fourth line
thereto with the word employment.
 15.
    
    Section 8.5 (Mitigation) is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence thereto
and replacing it with the following:




---



##### 



16.
    
    Section 8.13 (Executives Acknowledgments) is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following in lieu thereof:
  17.
    
    Section 8.14 (Section 409A) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following in lieu thereof:
 Payments Subject to Section 409A




---



##### 



OCLARO, INC.By:
Its:
    
    /s/ Alain Couder

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Catherine Hunt Rundle

Catherine Hunt Rundle
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14080-14081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; ADRD Initiative.
    Date: March 19, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/HHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 
20852, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f32362d3a333e713236333a2c3c2a1f31363771383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="422f2b30272e236c2f2b2e27312137022c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>, 301-496-5720.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; P01 Review.
    Date: March 21-22, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Li Jia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/
NIH/HHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, 301-451-
2854, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d21246327242c0d232425632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14787d3a7e7d75547a7d7c3a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 14081]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

     Dated: February 20, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03818 Filed 2-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### FRANCES P. SYKAS *v.*MARK J. SYKAS

(13401)

Dupont, C. J., and Lavery and Freedman, Js.

Argued January 11

decision released February 13, 1996

*Carlo Forzani,*with whom, on the brief, *were Arnold H. Klau*and *Donald J. Cantor,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Karen S. Gersten,*with whom, on the brief, was *Aaron L. Gersten,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the following:



| | (1) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-157168, 333-89140 and 33-62796) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan, the 2001
Repligen Corporation Stock Option Plan, and the 1992 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-106109, 333-30383, 333-57951, 333-76005, 333-79611, 333-95641, 333-31728, 333-35056 and 333-36280) of Repligen Corporation
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated June 9, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Repligen Corporation and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Repligen Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Repligen Corporation for the year ended March 31, 2011.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

June 9, 2011
No. 03

- 1 6

- 00 133

- CR

In the

COURT OF APPEALS

For the

T HIR D SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

at Austin

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 2 64 th Judicial District Court of

Williamson County, Texas

Cause Number 74451

______________________________________

KEEVIN DA SHAWN BYRD , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_____________________________________

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE T HIR D COURT OF

APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Keevin Da shawn Byrd , Appellant herein, by and through his

attorney of record, Kristen Jernigan , and files this, his Motion for Extension of

Time. In support of said motion, Appellant would show the Court the following:

1

. Appell ant’s brief wa s due in this case on September 16 , 2016

.

2. Appellant seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file his brief,

making his brief due on or before October 16 , 2016

.

3. The undersigned has sought one previous exten sion in this case and

mis

- cala nde red the new due date. ACCEPTED

03-16-00133-CR

13147483

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/10/2016 11:50:49 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK4. In the past thirty days, the undersigned has filed writs of habeas corpus

in Cause Number 13

- 0615

- K368, Ex parte Mashaun Hirschler

, in the 368 th District

Court of Williamson County and Cause Number 1746

- 93, Ex parte Rogelio Rios

Martinez, aka Rogelio Martinez Serrat a in the County Court at Law of Nacogdoches

County . Finally, the undersigned has made numerous court appearances and

u ndertaken the tasks associated with the management of a solo attorney practice.

5

. For the reasons set forth above, Appellant respectfully requests that he

b e granted an extension of thirty days so that his brief in this case will now be due on

October 16, 2016

.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully

requests that this Court grant his Motion for Extension of Time.

Respect fully submitted,

___ /s/

__ Kristen Jernigan

_____ KRISTEN JERNIGAN

State Bar Number 90001898

207 S. Austin Ave.

Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 904

- 0123

(512) 931

- 3650 (fax)

Kristen@txcrimapp.com2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time has been mailed to the Bell

County District Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 540 , Belton , Texas 76 513 , on October

10 , 2016

.

/s/ Kristen Jernigan

_______________________________ Kristen Jernigan
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1877
HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-031) Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Wanguhu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu , No. A79-513-031 (B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Ex parte Orby Truman CANNON.

No. 27631.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought by the relator Orby Truman Cannon, seeking his release from the Texas Prison System. He alleges that the order cumulating the sentences by virtue of which he is confined is ineffectual.

From the certified copies of the judgments and sentences before us, we learn the following:

On May 10, 1949, in Cause No. 61192 in the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, the relator plead guilty to the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at ten years. Relator does not question the validity of this sentence, he having served the same.

On the same day, in Cause No. 61193 in the Criminal District Court of Harris County, the relator plead guilty to the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at five years. The sentence in this cause concludes with this order: “As to the defendant Orby Truman Cannon alone this sentence to begin when the sentence in Cause No. 61192 shall have ceased to operate.”

Recently, in Ex parte McFarland, Tex.Cr.App., 274 S.W.2d 71, we held such an order ineffective since it was made in a different court, and is here controlling.

The writ is granted, and the relator is ordered discharged from confinement under the above sentences.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Deep Down, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald E. Smith, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eugene L. Butler, Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep Down.



Date:August
9, 2012



|       | /s/ Ronald E. Smith                   | 
|------ | ------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Ronald E. Smith                       | 
|Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|       |                                       | 



|       | /s/ Eugene L. Butler                           | 
|------ | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Eugene L. Butler                               | 
|Title: | Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer | 
|       |                                                |
---

|EXHIBIT 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER                  
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer of AMG
  Oil Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil
  Ltd. for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended, and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
  presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.

Date: May 3, 2006

| | /s/ Michael
      Hart                | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer | 

---
Jim Williams 

UAS Integration Office 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

February 24, 2015 

kinGump 

STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

GREGORY S. WALDEN 

+ 1 202.887.4213/fax: + 1 202.887.4288 

gswalden@akingump.com 

Re: Re: Docket FAA 2014-0400, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11150 

Dear Mr. Williams: 

This firm represents AeroCine, LLC, which received FAA Exemption No. 11150 (the 

"Exemption") last month authorizing AeroCine under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012 to operate its unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") for purposes of capturing 

high definition feature film quality aerial cinematography. AeroCine now seeks an amendment 

to that Exemption so that it may operate the same UAS (the Kopterworx Hammer X12) for 

additional purposes, namely real estate photography and videography, agriculture, inspections of 

oil and gas facilities, flare stacks, and bridge infrastructure, wildlife preservation industries, and 

search and rescue operations. 

AeroCine will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in the Exemption, 

except that condition/limitation number 2 would be revised to reflect these additional purposes. 

Other than an expansion of the purposes for which AeroCine will operate its UA V /UAS, there 

will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were the basis for 

the initial grant of exemption. 

Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any novel 

issue, and because AeroCine seeks to begin these operations without delay, AeroCine 

respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with publication of 

the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment 

expeditiously by summary means. 

RobertS. Strauss Building 11333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. I Washington, D.C. 20036-15641202.887.4000 I fax 202.887.42881 akingump corn 
Jim Williams 

Federal Aviation Administration 

February 24, 2015 

Page 2 

AkinGump 

STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

Thank you for your consideration of this petition. 

Sincerely, 

)W.~~m~~cJ{l__ '0
Filed 4/28/ 16 In re Aguilar CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re JAVIER AGUILAR

on Habeas Corpus. G053435

(Super. Ct. No. 11HF0530 )

O P I N I O N

Original proceedings; petition for a writ of habeas corpus to file a timely

notice of appeal. Petition granted.

Helen S. Izra for Petitioner.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, and Julie L. Garland, Assistant

Attorney General for Respondent.

* * *2

THE COURT: *

Petitioner, Javier Aguilar, seeks relief from the failure to file a timely notice

of appeal from his criminal conviction. We agree Aguilar is entitled to relief and the

petition is granted.

Following a jury trial, Javier Aguilar was convicted of a number of criminal

offenses and sentenced to 45 years to life. In his declaration, trial counsel states that after

the sentencing hearing

, Aguilar advised him that he wanted to appeal his conviction.

According to trial c ounsel, he advised Aguilar that he would file a notice of appeal on his

behal f, but due to a n error, the notice of appeal was inadvertently filed two day s late.

(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).) When Aguilar attempted to file his notice of appeal,

th e superior court stamped his notice of appeal “ ‘ Received 08/27/15, but not filed, ’ ” and

transmitted a letter to counsel explaining the last day to file a timely notice of appeal was

August 25, 2015.

The Attorney General does not oppose granting the petiti on without the

issuance of an order to show cause. ( People v. Romero (1994) 8 Cal.4th 728.)

The principle of constructive filing of the notice of appeal is applied in

situations where trial counsel advises a criminal defendant that he will file a notice of

appeal on his client’s behalf, and then fails to do so in accordance with the law. ( In re

Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 87

- 88.) Because trial counsel has a duty to file a proper

notice of appeal on his client’s behalf, (Pen. Code § 1240.1, subd. (b)) Ag uilar’s

reasonable reliance on counsel’s promise to file a timely notice of appeal entitles him to

the relief requested.

The petition is granted. The Clerk of the Superior Court is directed to file

the notice of appeal that was received but not filed on August 27 , 201 5 . Further

proceedings, including preparation of the record on appeal, are to be conducted according

* Before O’Leary, P. J., Rylaarsdam, J., and Aronson, J.3

to the applicable rules of court. In the interest of justice, the opinion in this matter is

deemed final as to this court forthwith.