alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1415 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1415

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to make technical corrections 
       to the segment designations for the Chetco River, Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2011

 Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Wu) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to make technical corrections 
       to the segment designations for the Chetco River, Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chetco River Protection Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT.

    Section 3(a)(69) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 
1274(a)(69)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the ``The 44.5-mile'' the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Designations.--'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively;
            (3) in clause (i), as redesignated--
                    (A) by striking ``25.5-mile'' and inserting ``27.5-
                mile''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Boulder Creek at the Kalmiopsis 
                Wilderness boundary'' and inserting ``Mislatnah 
                Creek'';
            (4) in clause (ii), as redesignated--
                    (A) by striking ``8'' and inserting ``7.5'';
                    (B) by striking ``Boulder Creek'' and inserting 
                ``Mislatnah Creek''; and
                    (C) by striking ``Steel Bridge'' and inserting 
                ``Eagle Creek'';
            (5) in clause (iii), as redesignated--
                    (A) by striking ``11'' and inserting ``9.5''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Steel Bridge'' and inserting 
                ``Eagle Creek''; and
            (6) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid rights, the 
                Federal land within the boundaries of the river 
                segments designated by subparagraph (A), is withdrawn 
                from all forms of--
                            ``(i) entry, appropriation, or disposal 
                        under the public land laws;
                            ``(ii) location, entry, and patent under 
                        the mining laws; and
                            ``(iii) disposition under all laws 
                        pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing or 
                        mineral materials.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of New Skies Satellites Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew M. Browne,Vice President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.     The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Andrew M. Browne                          |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Andrew M. Browne                              |
|   |   | Vice President and  Director                  |
|   |   | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

Date:       March30, 2006

 

----
#### CITY OF TORRINGTON *v.*LOCAL 1303-32, COUNCIL 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO

(14947)

Foti, Landau and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs January 9

decision released February 13, 1996

*J. William Gagne, Jr.,*filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).

*Victor M. Muschell*filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONM ENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

MEMORANDUM 

Date: October 29, 2015 

SUBJECT: Metiram: HED Response to Comments on the Registration Review Preliminary Work Plan 

PC Code: 0 14601 ; 014504; 600016 DP Ba rcode: 0429578 

Decision No.:510059 Rc!!istration No.: NA 

Petition No.: NA Reeula torv Action: Registration Review 

Risk Assessment Type: NA Case No.: NA 

TXR No.: NA 

MRrD No.: NA 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 

CAS No.: 9006-42-2; 96-45-7 

40 CFR: §180.2 17 

Danette Drew, Ch mis~ / ~ 

Pete Savoia, Ch mi ~ f<L- ~ ~~ 

Risk Assessment Branch V N II 

Health Effects Division (7509P) 

Michael Metzger, Branch Chi ef ~ 0 /J ~ Risk Assessment Branches V N II vG J f 

Health Effec ts Division (7509P) 

TO: Brittany Pruitt, Chemical Review Manager 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 3 

Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P) 

BASF Corporation has submitted comments on the Metiram Preliminary Work Plan for 

Registration Review (Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0290) (August, 24, 20 15 letter). The 

Health Effect's Division (HED) has considered the following BASF comment perta ining to the 

HED document titl ed Metiram: Human Health Risk Assessment Scoping Document in Support of 

Registration Review (612120 15, 0425218) and provides the fo llowing response: 

Page 1 of 2 
!.: Market Basket Survey Justification 

In response to the Agency's request for justification that the 1989- 1990 ethylene-bisdithiocarbamate (EBDC) Market Basket (MB) survey remains relevant for refining metiram and 

other EBDC dietary assessments, BASF maintains that it is still a viable and usable statistical 

survey. However, specific information has not been provided demonstrating the relevancy of the 

older MB survey for use in current assessments. BASF has asked for more detail on the types of 

information that would be needed. To allow for the continued use of the MB survey, specific 

data must be submitted that illustrate that the survey results (EBDC residue on food) remain 

representative of present EBDC usage. This would include providing comparisons (across time) 

of typical rates, EBDC usage totals, appli cation techniques/timing, percent crop treated data, 

commercial practices (handling, storage and transportation), and the capabilities of analytical 

methods to detect residues. The data should adequately demonstrate that expected EBDC 

residue levels in food today would not be appreciably different than residues found in the older 

MB survey. In the event that the continued use of the MB survey cam1ot be justified, the Agency 

will rely on residue data from available controlled studies (field tria l & processing studies), 

which will like ly result in significantly greater risk estimates, until a new survey can be 

provided. 

Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit31.2**

Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

I, Geoffrey M. Boyd,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|   |        |
|--------|-------------|
|        | May 9, 2007 |
|   |        |
|   |        |
|   | Sign:       |     /S/    Geoffrey  M. Boyd |   |
|   |        | Geoffrey M. Boyd |
|   |        | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1877

HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-513-031)

Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J.

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya,

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider removal

proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying

Wanguhu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu, No. A79-513-031

(B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, KevinRakin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                           | /s/ Kevin Rakin         |   |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  November  15, 2004 | Kevin Rakin             |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Billy Hugh GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27826.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

*Nov.*23, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Robbery is the offense; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

*747Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform
Investor and Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted) (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
(the Company), and Susan M. Kanaya, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge:





| | (a) |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (b) |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods
covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





Dated: August 13, 2002








/s/    DANIEL V. SANTI, M.D.,
PH.D. Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer/s/    SUSAN M. KANAYA Susan M. Kanaya Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
CalAmp Corp. and Subsidiaries




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-164440, 333-98981 and 333-119858), Form S-4 (No. 333-112851) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-31427, 33-36944, 33-72704, 33-60879, 333-33925, 333-93097, 333-114873 and 333-119842) of CalAmp Corp. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 28, 2011, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CalAmp Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended February 28, 2011.




/s/ SingerLewak LLP




Los Angeles, California
April 28, 2011




---
Exhibit 10.24
             SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Second Amendment (the "Amendment") is made as of this 11th day of
May, 2009, between CalAmp Corp. (the "Company") and Richard Gold
("Executive").

RECITALS:

      A.    The Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of March 4, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement") pursuant to
which Executive is employed by the Company.

      B.    The Company and Executive desire to amend the terms of the
Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the respective
covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as
follows, in each case, effective as of May 11, 2009:

1. The first sentence of Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"Salary.  Executive shall receive for services to be rendered hereunder a
salary at the rate of Thirty-One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars and
Sixty-Seven Cents ($31,666.67) per month payable at least as frequently as
monthly and subject to payroll deductions as may be necessary or customary in
respect of the Company's salaried employees (the "Base Salary")."

2. Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:
"Executive shall be eligible to participate in the Company's employee bonus
program in accordance with the terms of such program (as it may exist from
time to time) and in the discretion of the committee administering such
program."
3. The last sentence of Section 6(d)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"Following March 4, 2010, the number of months for which the Salary
Continuation Benefit shall be paid shall be decreased by one month for each
month of service after March 4, 2010 until Executive has completed 36 months
of employment at the Company; provided, that in no event shall Executive be
paid less than 12 months of his then Base Salary."

4. The first sentence of Section 6(e) of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"Termination Following a Change of Control.  If, within the 12-month period
following a Change of Control (as defined below), the Company terminates
Executive's employment for other than Cause or disability or Executive
terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined below), then seventy
five percent (75%) of Executive's then unvested equity awards granted under
the Company's stock incentive plans after the Executive became an employee of
the Company shall become vested."



      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first written above.

EXECUTIVE:                  COMPANY:

/s/ Richard Gold              /s/  Frank Perna
Richard Gold                By:    Frank Perna
                            Title: Chairman of the Board, CalAmp Corp.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”** )
      on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the **“Report”** ),
      I,
      David R. Bock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      David R. Bock


David
      R.
      Bock


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer








May
      10,
      2007
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Joseph Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summer Infant, Inc.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors:



|March 27, 2008 |  | /s/JOSEPH DRISCOLLJoseph Driscoll Chief Financial
Officer
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

I, Edward Alexander, the Chief Financial Officer of Proton Laboratories, Inc.
hereby certify that Proton Laboratories, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of Proton Laboratories, Inc.

August 21, 2006
(signed)
         ---------------------
/s/Edward Alexander
Edward Alexander
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1975 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, as the ``First 
           Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT OLIVER GOODALL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``First Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 281 East Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena, California, as the ``First 
           Lieutenant Oliver Goodall Post Office Building''.
```