alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WAYNE P. BLANCHARD ET AL. *v.*MARION S. LUBINSKI

(14671)

Fotí, Heiman and Schaller, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 13

decision released March 5, 1996

*PaulBialobrzeski*filed abrief for the appellants (petitioners).

*933
      *John R. Horvack, Jr.,*filed a brief for the appellee (respondent).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2011-1408

Docket Number

2008-SW-10-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

Alert Service Bulletin, Revision 1, dated March 22, 2007, with 3 different numbers 

(Nos. 76.00.04, 76.00.03, and 76.03).

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1593
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES C. HENDERSON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cv-00143-F) Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.1 Willis filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied on March 27, 2007. Using either November 21, 2006, or March 27, 2007, Willis’ appeal is untimely.
2 We note that in granting in forma pauperis status on appeal, the district court did not require Willis to fully comply with the provisions of our March 17, 1997, injunction order. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss Willis’ action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and alleging various constitutional violations. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal pe riod is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 21, 2006. 1 The notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2007. Because Willis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the- 3 - materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Fremont C. PECK, Clara S. Peck, Jr., and Samuel Child, Executors of the Will of Clara S. Peck, Deceased, Respondents.

No. 437.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 28, 1937.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Harry Marsclli, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

J. Sterling Halstead, of New York City, for respondents.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-158327 and 333-259486 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 14, 2022, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the PVH Associates Investment Plan for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.





/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC





Whippany, New Jersey





July 14, 2022
Rp r 2 2 1 0 05:12 p Fran k Kral l and/o r Trave l 81453G438 5 p. l Pag e 1 O t 1 Subj : Comment s Date : 4/22/201 0 4:57:3 5 P.M . Easter n Dayligh t Tim e ^>

_o r ^ ,i,.^ v From : WINNER0109@aol.co m t)o ^ - OM^-o'00'^

_Uq^ ^ \ To : EAS@dot.po v I a mwritin g t o voic e m y supi>or t fo r th e decisio no f

th e Cambri aCount y Airpor t Authorit y t o reques t

tha t Colga nAi r

b e chose na s th e airlin e t o continu e providin g commute r ai r servic e betwee nJohnstown , P A an d Dulle s Airpor t

i nWashington . i f it' s no t broken , don' t

fix it . Al l i s goin g wel l an dbot hpartie s wis hi t t o continue . Th e necessar y logistic s regardin g schedules , baggag e handlin g etc . ar e i nplac e an d^vorking . Wh y mes s i t up . I a mwritin g a s a nindividua l an dpar t tim e trave l agent . I nfact , I an da frien dar e goin g t o Barcelona , Spai nthi s Jul y t o boar dacruis e ship . I wa s abl e t o mak e ver y favorabl e ai r arrangemen t

fo r u s b y usin g th e Johnstow nCambri aCount y Airport . Th e acces s abilit y t o connectin g flight s throug hDulle s i s muc hgreate r tha nPittsburg han dpeopl e woul d fin dth e convenienc e i f the y tak e th e tim e t o chec k thing s out . Th e local s nee dt o d o mor e educatio no nthi s point . ^ I nconclusion , I vot e i nfavo r o f awardin g th e Essentia l Ai r Servic e contract s fo r

servic e t o Johnstown , Pa . t o th e curren t supplie r

Colga nAir . Fran k Kral l Johnstown , P A 814-536-438 5



### I TRIE D T O EMAI LTHI S T O YO U YESTERDA Y BU T I T WA S RETURNE D BECAUS EO FABA D ADDRESS . THAN K YOU !

Thursday , Apri l 22 , 201 0 AOL : WINNER010 9
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of
      I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”**) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the **“Report”**), I, Bradley S. Wear, Senior Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Bradley S.
      Wear


Bradley
      S. Wear


Senior
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer








November
      9, 2007
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly  Report of I-trax,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Anthony Tomaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Anthony Tomaro
Anthony Tomaro
Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

ALVIN JEAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2205

[ August 13, 2014 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Karen M. Miller

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 502003CF010785, 502003CF008760 and 502009
CF000028

.

Alvin Jean, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Alvin Jean’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We write to comment solely

on a pp ellant’s claim that his fifteen

- year sentences are illegal having been imposed following revocation of his youthful offender probationary terms. Through several recent opinions

, this court has rejected that challenge and explained its reasoning when concluding that comparable terms are legal. See Mosley v. State, 134 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lachen auer v. State, 117 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Eustache v. State, 83 S o. 3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

C IKLIN , L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearin g.
Exhibit 31.2

              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Paul D. Watson, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IDI Global,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                  /s/ Paul D. Watson
Date: May 11, 2004                ________________________________________
                                  Paul D. Watson, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Steven D. Weatherly, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IDI Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date: November 20, 2007  /s/ Steven D. Weatherly Steven D. Weatherly, Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
#### Perry Leslie BLAINE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27777.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated ; the punishment, $100 fine and 5 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.3

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated April 14, 2003 relatingto the combined financial statements of Calvin Klein, Inc. which appear in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporationdated February 12, 2003.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

New York, New York

September 19, 2003
#### SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEVISION SERVICE COMPANY, INC., ET AL. *v.*HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

(13982)

Dupont, C. J., and Foti and Schaller, Js.

Argued January 24

decision released March 5, 1996

*Benjamin Ancona, Jr.,*with whom was *Jane Ancona,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Stuart G. Blackburn,*for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
|   | (i) | the      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending April      3, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  June      10, 2010 |   |   | /s/      PHILLIP A. KAGEL                                |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Phillip      A. Kagel                                    |
|                                 |   |   | Vice      President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)        |

| The      material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC      and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company      under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any      general incorporation language contained in such  filing. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 5

- 00 012

- C R



### ____________________

SHAUN MICHAEL ZILLS

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 410th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 12

- 06

- 06950

- CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 21 , 20 14 , the trial co urt sentenced Shaun Michael Zills on a

conviction for fraudulent use of identifying information

. Zills filed a notice of

appeal on January 2 , 20 15

. The trial court signed a certification in which the court

certified that this is a plea

- bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the trial court’s

certification to the Court of Appeals. On January 9, 2015 , we notified the parties

that we would dismiss the appeal unless the appellant established grounds for2 continuing the appeal. No response has been filed. Because the trial court’s

certification shows the defendant does not have the right of appea l, we must

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice

Submitted on February 10, 2015

Opinion Delivered February 11, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
### NUMBERS 13 - 17 - 00 556 - CR AND 13 - 17 - 00 570 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MANSU LAU KNOX JR. , APPELLANT,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 27 th District Court of Bell County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Longoria

Order Per Curiam Appellant, Mansu Lau Knox Jr. , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his
convictions in trial court cause numbers 76444 and 77322

. 1 The trial court's certifications

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West , Westlaw through 2017 R.S. ).2

of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). On October 19, 2017 , we ordered appellant's counsel, Billy Ray Hall Jr. , to, within thirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3, 44.4. No response to this Court's order has been received. Therefore, we abate th ese appeal s and remand these causes to the trial court for a hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order. The trial court's findings and conclusions shall be in cluded in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order. If the trial court determines that counsel is una ble to represent appellant in th ese appeals , the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal s , whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 83

- 84 (1988); Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to p ursue th ese appeal s , is indigent, and is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included
in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).3

D elivered and filed t he 1 st day of December , 20 1 7

.
#### Clarence Odel BROWNLOW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27359.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 19, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*553PER CURIAM.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for drunken driving, with punishment assessed at a fine of $100 and five days in jail.

The record before us does not reflect that a notice of appeal was given and entered of record, as required by Art. 827, C.C.P.

‘ In the absence of a notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.