alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Steven D. Weatherly, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IDI Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 14, 2007  /s/ Steven D. Weatherly Steven D. Weatherly, Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
#### Ex parte Thomas T. RICHMOND.

No. 28432.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1956.

No attorney for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

By writ of habeas corpus, relator, a convict in the state penitentiary, seeks his discharge from further custody.

We come directly to the solé question presented, which is: the sufficiency of an order attempting to cumulate relator’s sentence with another case. The order of cu-mulation reads as follows:

> “ ‘this sentence to begin when the judgment and sentence in Cause No. 61790 has ceased to operate.’ ”

It will be noted that there is an entire absence-in that order of any reference to the style of the case or to the court in'which it was alleged to have been entered.

Neither the relator nor.the penitentiary authorities are thereby notified as to when the judgment and the sentence there attempted to be cumulated ceased to operate. See Ex parte Hamilton, Tex.Cr.App., 290 S.W.2d 673.

■ Under the record before us, relator, having served all sentences lawfully imposed, is entitled to .be discharged from further custody.

Relator is ordered discharged from further custody.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1996, consolidated financial statements and notes and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          36,503
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,455
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    205,923
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          42,741
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            43,354
<LOANS>                                        633,984
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 947,068
<DEPOSITS>                                     797,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                    29,154
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,507
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,308
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 947,068
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 57,577
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,252
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   810
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                73,639
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              28,424
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,270
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           44,369
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,334
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (79)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,301
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,301
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.30
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,466
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,728
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,522
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,636
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,387
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,607
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,607
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            607


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

﻿

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

﻿

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Aqua America, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David P. Smeltzer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

﻿

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and |
|--|-----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

| ﻿                                             |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| ﻿                                             |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| /s/ David P. Smeltzer                                |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| David P. Smeltzer                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |   |   |

February 24, 2017

﻿

----
#### Odell WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27651.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is felony theft, with a prior convicton alleged for . enhancement; the punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal.
#### Ben TYSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27481.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1955.

No attorney on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated, with a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, 1 year in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM From: The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0660) Date: April, 2012 Subject: Control of CO 2 Emissions with Efficiency Based Technologies
Introduction As the thermal efficiency of an EGU is increased, less fuel is burned per amount of electricity generated, and there is a corresponding decrease in CO 2 and other air emissions. To establish appropriate annual emissions rate for owners/operators that elect to comply with the 30 y ear average, we analyzed th e emission rates of the most efficient EGUs in the United States. The following is a brief summary of some of the efficiency based CO 2 control technologies for new coal-fired EGUs. This summa ry is not intended to be a comprehensive list of available technologies.

 EGU thermodynamic cycle - EGU efficiency can be significant improved by using a supercritical or ultrasupercritical steam cycle.

 EGU coal rank and quality – EGUs burning higher quality coals (e.g., bituminous) tend to be more efficient than EGUs burning lower quality coals with high moisture content (e.g., lignite).

 Coal gasification - Gasification process prior to combustion allo ws the coal to be burned using combined cycle technology.

 Number of Reheat Cycles – EGUs with a double reheat cycle use less fuel compared to a similar EGU using a single reheat cycle Coal-Fired EGU Efficiency Based CO 2 Emissions Performance
12-month CO 2 emission rates were calculated by dividing the sum of the emissions by the sum of the gross electrical energy output over the same period as reporte d to the Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) of the EPA. Figures 1 shows the performance of several of the best performing facilities using supercritical steam conditions in terms of CO 2 emissions. Figure 1: CO 2 Emissions Performance Data

Facility Time Period Primary Fuel Maximum 12-Month CO 2 Emissions Rate (ton/MWh) Capacity (MMBtu/h) Bull Run 1 2009 - 2010 BIT 0.87 12,604 Weston 4 2008 - 2010 SUB 0.87 5,217 W H Zimmer 1 2005 - 2009 BIT 0.88 11,968 Walter Scott Jr 4 2007 - 2010 SUB 0.90 7,675

Based on the performance of the Weston 4 facility, we ha ve concluded that an annua l standard of 1,800 lb CO 2 /MWh standard is appropriate for all new coal-fired EGUs, including new lignite and petroleum coke-fired EGUs. The CO 2 emissions for petroleum coke and lignite on a lb/MMBtu basis are respectively 6% and 3% higher than subbituminous coal. However, upgraded lign ite has a similar or higher heating value than subbituminous coal. A new facility similar to the Weston 4 facility burning upgraded lignite would be able to operate below the proposed annual sta ndard. The heating value of petroleum coke is so much higher than subbituminous coal that, all else being equal, an EGU s hould use about 3% less fuel than a similar subbituminousfired EGU and would have a similar emissions rate as an EGU firing upgraded lignite. A new facility could also be designed with a second reheat cycle or to co-fi re natural gas to increas e the compliance margin.
|                       |   | State or Other  |   |       |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------|--------|------------|
|                       |   | Jurisdiction of |   | Percentage |
| Subsidiaries               |   | Incorporation   |   | Ownership  |
|                       |   |            |   |       |
| Parke Bank                 |   | New Jersey      |   | 100%       |
| Parke Capital Trust I      |   | Delaware        |   | 100%       |
| Parke Capital Trust II     |   | Delaware        |   | 100%       |
| Parke Capital Trust III    |   | Delaware        |   | 100%       |
|                       |   |            |   |       |
| Subsidiaries of Parke Bank |   |            |   |       |
|                       |   |            |   |       |
| Parke Capital Markets      |   | New Jersey      |   | 100%       |
| Farm Folly, LLC            |   | New Jersey      |   | 100%       |
| 44 Business Capital LLC    |   | New Jersey      |   | 51%        |
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands** | 3 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow [Abstract]**                               |           |   |
| Debt component of allowance for funds used during construction                    | $ 1,030        | $ 782 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfCashFlowsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Debt component of allowance for funds used during construction
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtr_DebtComponentOfAllowanceForFundsUsedDuringConstruction**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03682]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-55-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 127; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Trucast LLC; (Turbine Wheels); Newberry, South Carolina

    On October 20, 2023, Trucast LLC submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 127G, in Newberry, South Carolina.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 73826-73827, October 27, 2023). 
On February 20, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: February 20, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-03682 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-trax, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank A. Martin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                 (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Frank A. Martin
--------------------
Frank A. Martin
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003
IMAGE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC.

                     EXHIBIT 32.1 - ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lewis M. Edwards, Chairman and Chief Technology Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                    /S/ LEWIS M. EDWARDS
                    -----------------------
                    LEWIS M. EDWARDS,
                    CHAIRMAN,
                    EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT,
                    CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER, AND PRINCIPAL
                    ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                    NOVEMBER 20, 2007
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


April 2, 2019


 


Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 7-2


Defined Preservation 95 Fund


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


		Re:	Defined Preservation 95 Fund (the “Trust”)



 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement (File No. 333-229729) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy
of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 





	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/Oscar Loynaz	 
	 	 	Name: Oscar Loynaz	 
	 	 	Title:  Managing Director
VIII 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1857 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Bartosz Kumor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 1857 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR BARTOSZ 

2 KUMOR. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Bartosz Kumor shall be eligible for issuance of an 

6 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

7 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil8 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

9 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

10 lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Bartosz Kumor 

12 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci13 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en14 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

15 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

16 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Bartosz Kumor, the Secretary of State shall in26 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
3 

HR 1857 RFS 

1 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi2 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

5 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na6 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

7 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Bartosz Kumor shall not, 

11 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi12 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with