alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|   | /s/ KIM D. KELLY                                                                                          |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                           |   |
|   | **Kim D. Kelly President and Chief Executive Officer Insight Midwest, L.P. August 8, 2003**               |   |
|   |                                                                                                      |   |
|   | /s/ DINESH C. JAIN                                                                                        |   |
|   |                                                                                                           |   |
|   | **Dinesh C. Jain Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Insight Midwest, L.P. August 8, 2003** |   |
#### Melvin E. MERWIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27701.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1955.

*288No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 2 years.

The record on appeal contains no, statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal.
#### Ozell BROOKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27274.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1955.

Leon Lusk, Houston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, 15 years.

Two officers of the City of Houston, operating in plain clothes in an unmarked automobile, observed a Pontiac automobile traveling at a fast rate of speed. They overtook the Pontiac and found it to contain the appellant and two women and informed them that they were police officers. They then asked for appellant’s identification, and the appellant asked, “What are you going to do with me — what are you going to do now?” The officer testified that, even though they intended only to give the appellant a ticket for speeding, they did not tell him so and, to the contrary, told him that they were going to put him in jail. It was after the appellant was so informed that he committed the assault which constitutes the basis for this prosecution.

The trial court refused, over the appellant’s objection, to charge the jury upon the duty of a peace officer arresting a citizen for the offense of speeding to give such person a ticket or summons to court for such offense and not to further arrest him or put him in jail, unless he refuses to receive such summons and signs a promise to appear in response thereto, as provided by law. Such is the holding of this Court in Montgomery v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 606, 170 S.W.2d 750. The jury was entitled to an explanation of the law relating to the right of the officers and the limitation placed upon them in connection with the arrest, such being relevant on the issue of malice, if not upon the intent to kill; and the trial court fell into error in refusing such a charge.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the                               ( print page 14529)                            Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.                    

# DATES:

*Date of notice:*                         February 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 37 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-192 and CP2024-198.                

Sarah Sullivan,

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2024-03892 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENTOF
 ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION OF
 SUPERTEX,
INC.                                      OCT281988


Henry C.
Pao and John B. Goodrich certify that:


1.They are the President and
Assistant Secretary


respectively,
of Supertex, Inc., a California corporation.


2. The
Articles of Incorporation of this corporation are amended to add the following
Article V


FIFTH


Section
1.  Limitation of Directors' Liability.  The liabil­ity
of the directors of this corporation for monetary damages shall be eliminated to
the fullest extent permissible under California law.


Section
2.  Indemnification of Corporate
Agents. This corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of
agents (as defined in Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law)
through bylaw provisions, agreements with agents, vote of share­holders or
disinterested directors, or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification
otherwise permitted by such Section 317, subject to the limits set forth in
Section 204 of the California Genera1 Corporation Law with respect to actions
for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders.


Section
3.  Repeal
or Modification.  Any repeal or modifica­tion of the
foregoing provisions of this Article IV shall not adversely affect any right of
indemnification or limitation of liability of an agent of this corporation
relating to acts or omissions occurring prior to such repeal or
modification."


3. The
foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the
Board of Directors.


4. The
foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the
required vote of shareholders in accor­dance with Sections 902 and 903 of
the Corporations Code.  The total number of outstanding shares of the
corporation was 12,162,999 shares of Common Stock as of the record date for
shareholder approval.  The number of shares voting in favor of the
Amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.  The percentage vote
required was more than 50% of the outstanding stock.


We
further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state ofCalifornia that the
matters set forth in this Certifi­cate are true and correct of our own
knowledge.


John
      B. Goodrich, Assistant
Secretary


Date:
October 14, 1983
 
  John B.
Goodrich, Assistant Secretary
 i
Exhibit 32.1
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Andresmin  Gold  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean de
Largie, President,  principal executive officer and principal accounting officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to the  best of my
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: May 19, 2005                             /s/ Dean de Largie
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Dean de Largie, President and
                                                Director (Principal Executive
                                                Officer and Principal Accounting
                                                Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-14988, 33-59948 and 33-86626) pertaining to the Incentive
Stock Option Plan, Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the Employee
Retirement Plan of Builders Transport, Incorporated and subsidiaries and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated March 28, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Builders Transport,
Incorporated and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Winston-Salem, North Carolina
March 28, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 12939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03374]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 27)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--2023

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2023. The decision solicits 
comments on the following issues: the railroads' 2023 current cost of 
debt capital, the railroads' 2023 current cost of preferred equity 
capital (if any), the railroads' 2023 cost of common equity capital, 
and the 2023 capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market 
value basis.

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due by April 2, 2024. 
Statements of the railroads are due by April 23, 2024. Statements of 
other interested persons are due by May 14, 2024. Rebuttal statements 
by the railroads are due by June 4, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed with the Board via e-filing on the 
Board's website.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. If 
you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The decision in this proceeding is posted at 
www.stb.gov.
    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).


    Decided: February 13, 2024.

    By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and 
Schultz.
Stefan Rice,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-03374 Filed 2-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### Laird SIMPSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28054.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Harold Green, County Atty., Tahoka, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicate,d; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: CHARLES T. FOTE,

Appellant

______________________

2018-2311

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/455,526.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 

Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by JASON C. WHITE, Chicago, IL; WILLIAM R. PETERSON, 

Houston, TX. 

 AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W.

KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT MCBRIDE. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
 PER CURIAM (REYNA, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

November 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**Exhibit99.5**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John R. Cooper, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avocent Corporation onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2002 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AvocentCorporation.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2002 | By:                                                           | /s/ John R.  Cooper |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                          | Name: John  R. Cooper                                         |
|                          | Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

I, Douglas E. Pritchett,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of AvocentCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2002fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Avocent Corporation.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2002 | By:                                                                                 | /s/ Douglas  E. Pritchett |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                          | Name:  Douglas E. Pritchett                                                         |
|                          | Title:   Senior  Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                          | Treasurer  and Assistant Secretary                                                  |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Albert Bourla, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pfizer Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer Inc.


/s/ ALBERT BOURLAAlbert BourlaChairman and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2022


This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Minn Shares Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Gilbert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard GilbertRichard GilbertPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 28, 2011
Exhibit
      32.2(*)






Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
      Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      T. Everett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the
      best of my knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:
      August 8, 2006










/s/ MICHAEL
      T. EVERETT


Michael
      T. Everett


Chief
      Financial Officer





















































_____________________________






(*)
      In
      accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
      33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
      Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany
      this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether
      made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
      specifically incorporates it by reference.
































Form
          10-Q
          for quarter ended June 30, 2006
ri<t~ 2/&>/5~

S3,IU'0I

COURTOfCRfMIWftl APPEALS

APR 88 2Q1B

/kt&Z/( fSC 787// DATE: D'l^Z

BY:J? C^

7%~ cTZ M>r &&/SJTZ--A'

at*..
j/b„ 0i/&&&.. "A"

"7 jS&Tk- *f Tkms: ,

Af O.7*t"a a/ 7Z *S7Kf.Jk£r *•; *m*'*mr*iH?•«««), j*vf*<M«tW»«'W»» •*

/0&^-'A/J&f<d&£.Z£i ^r^^C ST^/kelC s?a2%ej£±t /?$l//*M "/&•&*

'A4W'£&*/*{&//£&..
Tfotco/7 To ^Tm/&&,

"Tag* '£>f$g&kJr jfo&'ZA&GL &J6LS' Mj-%^- Ate 7d&L.

*7$a*/ T^€^ 7/k^T /h/gg7ksr iLtfd-j 7a/ Sf/frZgA.

/// />& 77/?/?eA ^7*rj4^€^-T^£&&& '^J$L

&*<z*<j^ u/7oT ^7&u &(^irfjL> /swig*.* #77$^

7v t£s* /*j&&*^^ Sg£t^.7zr A&7*£>Uf Tfa&to/r

/***rr /^ /$*St rg ?t^ /eWkr.&#- tj&^„
A^^rfA^.^<^

fg.A-.tUE-Jt

£J7t&Z£-7^/zj^} 7At&^ STk^k <r A/f^^m^./<*4S/*A& 7&&sS

rA/iL-AL* <g>k (6) &j&&7ls- ^a3^^ /%y&^sr~sr 4/aA#J7L*A

/*W*> aA^ /a&J 7&&- A?£jrf' ^A^sr &&3^ Sou^/eL A*t,

7^ STZtil'sr A/&/J&&L ft/riffled^ "STaAzr /Cisfofyz)

tfA/&7d-7ZtZif Zj&A&uA&^-ef 7/<o7 $$(&)\ 7~£A&S

£<=>eAj£^ e>7^ 7?/Z//f/A&*7-' A&aC-'&edLtxGLr-

/L&/ZiZ,u t/&A*c£

7?& £o7. 9ooo

7ft/Adg£5oA/ 7aL

7S£S-^
#### John J. COLEMAN et al., Appellants, v. Andrew PONTICOS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 15, 1965.

*905Robert F. Greene, Burlington, for appellants.

Howell W. Vincent, Rodney S. Bryson, Covington, for appellees.

HILL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on appellee’s motion for summary judgment, in appellee’s suit to cancel a contract and performance bond.

The Colemans, who owned a house in a subdivision being developed by appellee, Andrew Ponticos, had previously filed an action against Ponticos seeking to enjoin him from building any more houses in the subdivision on the ground that he was not complying with restrictions reserved in the deed to the Colemans. Before entry of a judgment in that case the parties executed the contract and performance bond which are the subject of this action.

The contract, dated December IS, 1961, provided that on June 15, 1962, the Cole-mans would convey and Ponticos would purchase the Coleman property for $19,350. Ponticos agreed to and did execute a $5000 performance bond with the appellee, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, as surety. The Colemans in turn agreed to waive, release and forever quitclaim all right, title and interest they had in the restrictions set out in their deed. They also agreed to dismiss the suit seeking to enjoin Ponticos from building any more houses.

On the date set in the contract for conveyance Ponticos filed this action to enjoin the Colemans from enforcing the contract. The Colemans counterclaimed against Pon-ticos and cross-claimed against The Cincinnati Insurance Company.

At the conclusion of a hearing on motion for summary judgment the chancellor entered judgment declaring the contract in question void for “lack of mutuality,” and adjudging Ponticos the relief he sought in his complaint. We conclude the chancellor was in error in so finding. The contract is valid. 17 Am.Jur.2d Contracts, Section 104; Fowler’s Bootery v. Selby Shoe Company, 273 Ky. 670, 117 S.W.2d 931; and Rodgers v. Larrimore & Perkins, 188 Ky. 468, 222 S.W. 512.

The judgment is therefore reversed with directions that it be set aside, and that the parties be heard on issues presented by the pleadings.

Judgment reversed.