alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, Un ited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designat ion.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/16/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD VAUGHN KELLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. JARDINE PETROLEUM CO., INC., STERLING JARDINE, D. CHRIS BUTTARS, ALPHA TRANSPORT, INC., JACK WHITE, DLD DISTRIBUTING CO. OF WYOMING, DENTON L. DUNN, DENNIS MURRAY, ORSON MADSEN, ROBERT RIETZ, individually, and in their own official capacity with the Salt Lake County Constable Departments,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-4202 (D.C. No. 94-CV-86) (D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO, BRIGHT, ** and KELLY, Circuit Judges.-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Edward Keller appeals from the district c ourt’s order granting summary judgment for defendants. The record on app eal is voluminous. Nevertheless, plaintiff has failed to provide in hi s appellate briefs any references to the record. His arguments are relegated to broa d, conclusory statements and to simple repetition of the allegations contained in h is complaint. We are not required to sift through the record, manufacturing plaintiff’s arguments for him, and we decline to do so in this case. SEC v. Thoma s , 965 F.2d 825, 826-27 (10th Cir. 1992). The judgment of the United States Distri ct Court for the District of Utah is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                    66,260
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             28,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          94,811
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            94,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    105,353
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  10,226
<OTHER-SE>                              (783,168)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              94,811
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         127,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        18,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (145,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (145,540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (145,540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.01)


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM 

From: The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0660) 

Date: April, 2012 

Subject: Control of CO2 Emissions with Efficiency Based Technologies 

Introduction 

As the thermal efficiency of an EGU is increased, less fuel is burned per amount of electricity generated, and 

there is a corresponding decrease in CO2 and other air emissions. To establish appropriate annual emissions rate 

for owners/operators that elect to comply with the 30 year average, we analyzed the emission rates of the most 

efficient EGUs in the United States. The following is a brief summary of some of the efficiency based CO2

control technologies for new coal-fired EGUs. This summary is not intended to be a comprehensive list of 

available technologies. 

 EGU thermodynamic cycle - EGU efficiency can be significant improved by using a supercritical or ultrasupercritical steam cycle. 

 EGU coal rank and quality – EGUs burning higher quality coals (e.g., bituminous) tend to be more efficient 

than EGUs burning lower quality coals with high moisture content (e.g., lignite). 

 Coal gasification - Gasification process prior to combustion allows the coal to be burned using combined 

cycle technology. 

 Number of Reheat Cycles – EGUs with a double reheat cycle use less fuel compared to a similar EGU using a 

single reheat cycle 

Coal-Fired EGU Efficiency Based CO2 Emissions Performance 

12-month CO2 emission rates were calculated by dividing the sum of the emissions by the sum of the gross 

electrical energy output over the same period as reported to the Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) of the EPA. 

Figures 1 shows the performance of several of the best performing facilities using supercritical steam conditions 

in terms of CO2 emissions. 

Figure 1: CO2 Emissions Performance Data 

Facility Time Period Primary Fuel Maximum 12-Month CO2

Emissions Rate (ton/MWh) 

Capacity 

(MMBtu/h) 

Bull Run 1 2009 - 2010 BIT 0.87 12,604 

Weston 4 2008 - 2010 SUB 0.87 5,217 

W H Zimmer 1 2005 - 2009 BIT 0.88 11,968 

Walter Scott Jr 4 2007 - 2010 SUB 0.90 7,675 

Based on the performance of the Weston 4 facility, we have concluded that an annual standard of 1,800 lb 

CO2/MWh standard is appropriate for all new coal-fired EGUs, including new lignite and petroleum coke-fired 

EGUs. The CO2 emissions for petroleum coke and lignite on a lb/MMBtu basis are respectively 6% and 3% 

higher than subbituminous coal. However, upgraded lignite has a similar or higher heating value than 

subbituminous coal. A new facility similar to the Weston 4 facility burning upgraded lignite would be able to 

operate below the proposed annual standard. The heating value of petroleum coke is so much higher than 

subbituminous coal that, all else being equal, an EGU should use about 3% less fuel than a similar subbituminousfired EGU and would have a similar emissions rate as an EGU firing upgraded lignite. A new facility could also 

be designed with a second reheat cycle or to co-fire natural gas to increase the compliance margin.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(D)

              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                   COMMUNICATIONS WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                        


     Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the
undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation:

     FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Communications World International,
Inc.

     SECOND:  The reduction in the number of authorized shares, itemized by
class and series is as follows:  The number of authorized shares of Series A
Preferred Stock has been reduced by 300,000, from 1,000,000 to 700,000.

     THIRD:  The total number of authorized shares, itemized by class and
series, remaining after reduction of the shares is as follows:

     The total number of authorized shares is 4,700,000 of which 2,000,000 are
no par value common shares and 2,700,000 shares are preferred shares, each
having a par value of $1.00 per share of which 700,000 preferred shares are
designated Series A Preferred Stock, 100,000 shares are designated as Series B
Preferred Stock, 440,000 shares are designated as Series C Preferred Stock,
250,000 shares are designated as Series E Preferred Stock, 1,100,000 shares are
designated as Series F Preferred Stock and 83,500 shares are designated as
Series G Preferred Stock.

     FOURTH:  The Amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors of the
corporation.  Shareholder action was not required pursuant to Section 7-106-302
of the Colorado Business Corporation Act.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment
to the Articles of Incorporation to be executed as of the ___ day of August,
1998.

                                    COMMUNICATIONS WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                    By:_____________________________________
                                    Name:___________________________________
                                    Title:__________________________________
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 10, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Alain CouderAlain CouderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Issued by the Department of Transportation 

on the 11th day ofJune, 2013 

In the matter ofthe cancellation of the Air Taxi authority 

issued to 

Order 2013-6-8 

Served: June 1 L 2013 

Docket DOT -OST -2012-0022 

VIH COUGAR HELICOPTERS, INC. 

pursuant to the provisions of 14 CFR 298.24 

FINAL ORDER 

SUMMARY 

On March 12, 2012, the Department issued Show Cause Order 2012-3-7, tentatively finding that 

VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. ("VIH Cougar''), an operating air taxi, is not a U.S. citizen as 

defined in 49 U.S.C. § 40102(a)(l5) (the "Statute") and consequently, proposing to cancel its air 

taxi exemption authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(f) and 14 C.F.R. Part 298. As noted in 

that order, the Department based its tentative findings on the totality of the circumstances, 

including the operational and managerial interrelationships between VIH Cougar and 

Mr. Kenneth Norie, a Canadian citizen and the beneficial minority owner of VIH Cougar, and/or 

the entities in which he has a majority and/or controlling interest (hereinafter collectively 

referred to as "VIH Group"). 1 

VIH Cougar, although objecting to our tentative findings, subsequently initiated a change in 

ownership and management in response to these findings. We have thoroughly reviewed the 

objections VIH Cougar provided to our Show Cause Order, as well as the additional evidentiary 

material VIH Cougar provided describing the relationship between it, its new owner, and its new 

management on the one hand, and Mr. Norie and VIH Group on the other. Our review of the 

additional evidentiary material VIH Cougar provided reveals that it has not sufficiently 

addressed or resolved the issues identified in the Department's tentative findings. The 

undisputed facts show that VIH Cougar continues to be dependent on Mr. Norie, a Canadian 

citizen, and VIH Group, entities in which he has a majority or controlling interest, for nearly all 

VlH Group refers to the entities in which Mr. Norie has a majority and/or controlling interest, including VIH 

Aviation Group, Ltd.; VIH Helicopters USA, Inc.; Cougar Aviation, Ltd.; Cougar Helicopters, Inc.; VIH Helicopters 

Ltd.; VIH Aerospace, Inc.; GAO FBO Services, LLC; and Kenlor Investments, Ltd. We note that until recently, 

these entities were wholly owned by Mr. Norie.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0a39593829584918289b0969d93de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c093a5a3b2a5b4a1b2b980a6ada3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 
20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received 
within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, 
and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on 
agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90e4e2f1f4f5f1fef1fce9e3f9e3d0f6fdf3bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f7b7d6e6b6a6e616e63767c667c4f69626c21686079">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201418.
    Agreement Name: Hyundai Glovis/Grimaldi North Europe Space Charter 
Agreement.
    Parties: Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd; Grimaldi Deep Sea S.P.A. and 
Grimaldi Euromed S.P.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Grimaldi to charter space to 
Hyundai Glovis in the trade from Baltimore, MD to Zeebrugge, Belgium.
    Proposed Effective Date: 2/12/2024.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/86545.
    Agreement No.: 201419.
    Agreement Name: WHL/ONE Vessel Sharing Agreement.
    Parties: Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd; Wan Hai Lines Ltd. and Wan 
Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE. Ltd.
    Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen O'Connor.
    Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes Wan Hai Lines Ltd., Wan Hai 
Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd., and Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. to 
operate shared services and to allow each other to charter slots on 
their vessels on the trade between China, Taiwan, Vietnam on the one 
hand and ports on the United States West Coast on the other hand.
    Proposed Effective Date: 2/14/2024.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/86546.

    Dated: February 20, 2024.
Carl Savoy,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-03727 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Dicut, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2003


/s/ Raj Kalra
Raj Kalra, Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Dicut, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003


/s/ Pierre Quilliam
Pierre Quilliam, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Life Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-59741,
Registration No. 33-21807 and Registration No. 33-956, and the Company's
registration statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 33-29536, of our report
dated January 23, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Life Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994,
and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                 Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Rockville, MD
February 23, 1996

                                      E-32
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1669 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a disincentive with 

respect to States funneling proceeds from license plate sales to partisan 

political organizations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a disincentive with respect to States funneling proceeds from 

license plate sales to partisan political organizations, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘License Plate Political 

5 Slush Fund Prevention Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1669 IH

1 SEC. 2. LICENSE PLATE SALES AND POLITICAL ACTIVITY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘§ 167. License plate sales and political activity 

6 ‘‘(a) WITHHOLDING OF APPORTIONMENTS FOR NON7 COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary shall withhold 15 percent of 

8 the amount required to be apportioned to any State under 

9 each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section 104(b) on 

10 October 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after the date 

11 of enactment of this Act, and on October 1 of each fiscal 

12 year thereafter, if the State does not meet the requirement 

13 of subsection (b) on that date. 

14 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—A State meets the requirement 

15 of this subsection if the chief executive of the State cer16 tifies to the Secretary that the State, as of the date of 

17 the certification, does not provide to an organization that 

18 engages in covered political activity any proceeds resulting 

19 from the sale of a license plate in that State. 

20 ‘‘(c) EFFECT OF NONCOMPLIANCE.—Funds withheld 

21 from a State under subsection (a) shall lapse and shall 

22 be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction 

23 (or, if there is no Federal budget deficit, for reducing the 

24 Federal debt, in such manner as the Secretary of the 

25 Treasury considers appropriate). 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1669 IH

1 ‘‘(d) COVERED POLITICAL ACTIVITY DEFINED.—In 

2 this section, the term ‘covered political activity’ means the 

3 advocacy of the election or defeat of a candidate with re4 spect to an election for a Federal, State, or local office.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap6 ter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 

‘‘167. License plate sales and political activity.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
ex_139592.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Plumas Bank


Salary Continuation Agreement 


Andrew Ryback


2019-1 Benefit Increase Amendment


 


Whereas, Plumas Bank (hereinafter “Employer”) established the Plumas Bank Executive Salary Continuation Agreement originally effective August 23, 2005, with an Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement, effective December 17, 2008 (hereinafter “Agreement”), for Andrew Ryback (hereinafter "Executive"); and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer’s intention is to have the Agreement comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (hereinafter “IRC 409A) and provide certain benefits to the Executive in the form of supplemental retirement deferred compensation payments which shall commence upon the certain events within the Executive’s Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer now wishes to amend the Agreement to increase the supplemental retirement deferred compensation annual benefit, which is in line with the desires of the Employer and the associated Employer's Board of Directors as it relates to the benefit provided for within the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, Article 15, Amendment, Section 15.10, Amendments, of the Agreement provides the Bank with the authority to amend and modify the Agreement with the consent of the Executive, evidenced through their execution of such amendment.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Employer, pursuant to the authority within the Agreement and consent of the Executive, does hereby amend the Agreement with this 2019-1 Benefit Increase Amendment in the following manner:


 


1.            Article 1, Terms and Definitions, Section 1.02, Annual Benefit, is hereby deleted in its entirety and revised to read as follows:


 


"1.02 Annual Benefit. The term “Annual Benefit” shall mean an annual sum of one hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) multiplied by the Applicable Percentage (defined below) and then reduced to the extent required: (i) under the other provisions of this Agreement; (ii) by reason of the lawful order of any regulatory agency or body having jurisdiction over the Employer; and (iii) in order for the Employer to properly comply with any and all applicable state and federal laws, including, but limited to, income, employment and disability income tax laws (e.g., FICA, FUTA, SDI). "


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has executed this Amendment on this the 1st day of April 2019.


 


	Plumas Bank	Executive: Andrew Ryback
	 	 
	
			By: /s/ Richard L. Belstock

				Signature: /s/ Andrew J. Ryback
	 	 
	Title: Chief Financial Officer 	Title:        President and Chief Executive Officer



                 


1