alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Conversion of $378,000 debt plus accrued interest


 




EXHIBIT 10.36




To:

Dave Anderson, CEO




From:

Vincent L. Celentano 

Mary Celentano 

William Celentano




Date

March 14, 2019




Subject:

Note Conversions

 

Please use this letter as your authorization to convert currently outstanding convertible notes due us and our affiliates as per the schedule included with this note. We have calculated interest through February 26, 2019 and you may use that date for all conversions without penalty.




Please issue shares related to the conversions in the appropriate names and overnight to the proper addresses as soon as possible.




Thank you,




					
	/s/Vincent L. Celentano

	 
	/s/Mary Celentano

	 
	/s/William Celentano


	Vincent L. Celentano

	 
	Mary Celentano

	 
	William Celentano










Conversion Schedule







Celentano Family Debt Conversion Schedule




Interest Calculation Date

2/26/2019




																							
	 
	 
	Original Note 

Date

	 
	Note 

Principal

	 
	 
	Accrued 

Interest

	 
	 
	Total 

Due

	 
	 
	Conversion 

Price

	 
	 
	Shares 

Due

	 

	Celentano Consulting Company LLC

	 

	12/27/2012

	 

	$

	165,500

	 

	 

	$

	71,446

	 

	 

	$

	236,946

	 

	 

	$

	0.345

	 

	 

	 

	686,800

	 


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	William Celentano

	 

	10/30/2014

	 

	$

	10,000

	 

	 

	$

	3,028

	 

	 

	$

	13,028

	 

	 

	$

	0.12

	 

	 

	 

	108,567

	 


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	1985 Trust for William Celentano

	 

	1/20/2015

	 

	$

	85,000

	 

	 

	$

	24,403

	 

	 

	$

	109,403

	 

	 

	$

	0.30

	 

	 

	 

	364,677

	 


	1985 Trust for William Celentano

	 

	2/6/2015

	 

	$

	47,500

	 

	 

	$

	13,482

	 

	 

	$

	60,982

	 

	 

	$

	0.30

	 

	 

	 

	203,273

	 


	1985 Trust for William Celentano

	 

	3/13/2015

	 

	$

	50,000

	 

	 

	$

	13,856

	 

	 

	$

	63,856

	 

	 

	$

	0.30

	 

	 

	 

	212,853

	 


	Totals

	 

	 
	 

	$

	182,500

	 
	 
	$

	51,741

	 

	 

	$

	234,241

	 

	 

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	780,803

	 


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Mary Celentano

	 

	8/11/2015

	 

	$

	20,000

	 

	 

	$

	4,963

	 

	 

	$

	24,963

	 

	 

	$

	0.20

	 

	 

	 

	124,815
#### Jodie ASBERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28780.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction, *on*a plea of guilty before the court, is for the offense of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.0**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsEnzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-101898, 333-64110, 333-18051, 333-121468, 333-140282, 333-134453, and 333-132467) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-137723) on Form S-3 of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2009, with respect  to the consolidated balance sheets of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, the related financial statement schedule, and  the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New JerseyMarch 6, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1632 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Chris Davis 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5014 
Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant Chris Davis Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Chris Davis 
                             Post Office''.
```
1

The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3631

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Frank Jayrold Bettelyoun, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 27, 2010

Filed: April 30, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Jayrold Bettelyoun appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his Federal Rule

of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct a “clerical error” in the amended judgment

in his criminal case. We agree with the district court that the amended judgment

accurately reflects the sentence imposed; the type of error Bettelyoun alleged was not

a clerical error, see United States v. Yakle, 463 F.3d 810, 811 (8th Cir. 2006) (per

curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32-2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Hesperia  Holding,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003,  as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Donald Shimp of the Company, certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.




                         Donald Shimp[
                         President
                         August 27, 2003
Exhibit 31.1  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Kevin R. Griffith, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IDI Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date: September 20, 2007  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Petitioner - Appellee, 

 v. 

THO TRAN, 

 Respondent - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:01-hc-00833-BR) 

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tho Tran, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Tho Tran appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion requesting a furlough under 18 U.S.C. § 4243(h)(1) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Tran, No. 5:01-hc-00833-BR 

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his
knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.




/s/
      James DorstJames
      Dorst,
                Chief
      Financial OfficerDated:
      March 31, 2010
**ACCOUNTANT'S
      AWARENESS LETTER**








Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, N.W.


Washington,
      D.C.  20549








We
      are
      aware that our report dated August 3, 2007 on our review of the interim
      financial statements of I-trax, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007 and
      for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and
      included in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 is incorporated by
      reference in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-110891
      and 333-114604)  and on Form S-8 (No. 333-125685).  Pursuant
      to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
      considered as part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by
      us
      within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.








**GOLDSTEIN
      GOLUB KESSLER LLP**


New
      York,
      New York





August
      9,
      2007
#### Ernest Lee McCOMBS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29382.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 18, 1957.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., A. D. Bowie,, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $150.

The record reflects that the appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on April 20, 1957, during the March term of the trial court and notice of appeal was given on that date.

The record further -reflects that the appellant is at large on an appeal bond approved and filed during the term of court at which notice of appeal was given.

An appeal bond entered into during the term of court at which notice of appeal is given does not comply with the statute, Art. 830, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and does not confer jurisdiction upon this court to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal. Fowler v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 450, 228 S.W.2d 512; Banti v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 289 S.W.2d 244 and Nesbit v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 306 S.W.2d 901.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                 | By:                     | /s/ Kevin Rakin |   |
|--------|----------------------|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Date:  | August 14, 2003 | Kevin Rakin             |
|   |                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     IMTEC, Inc., EX-27, FDS for 10-K, June 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000730045
<NAME>                        IMTEC, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1352562
<SECURITIES>                                   92999
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1674283
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175000
<INVENTORY>                                    1402318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4552093
<PP&E>                                         5462456
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3911176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6152363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1186592
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15531
<OTHER-SE>                                     2489674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6152363
<SALES>                                        8801389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8801389
<CGS>                                          3069836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4682513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3241823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               175000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                921458
<INCOME-TAX>                                   365384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            556074
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   556074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.34
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1680 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1680

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide commuter flexible 
                         spending arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2011

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide commuter flexible 
                         spending arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Flexible Savings 
Accounts Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to cafeteria plans) is amended by redesignating subsections 
(k) and (l) as subsections (l) and (m), respectively, and by inserting 
after subsection (j) the following new subsection:
    ``(k) Transportation Flexible Spending Arrangement.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (f), 
        qualified transportation fringe shall be treated as a qualified 
        benefit for purposes of this section to the extent provided 
        under a flexible spending arrangement (as defined in section 
        106(c)).
            ``(2) Qualified transportation fringe.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, the term `qualified transportation fringe' has 
        the meaning given such term by section 132(f), except that 
        paragraph (2)(B) thereof shall be applied by substituting 
        `$100' for `$175'.''.
    (b) Modification of Regulations.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall make such modifications to Treasury Regulations under section 125 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as may be necessary to allow 
qualified transportation fringe (as defined in section 125(k) of such 
Code) to be offered through a flexible spending arrangement in a 
cafeteria plan.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Herman CHOICE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27294.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, 20 days in jail and a fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556 and 333-17843) pertaining to the
Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources,
Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser
Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock
Plan, as amended, respectively, of Kaiser Ventures Inc. of our report dated
January 18, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Kaiser Ventures Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                              --------------------------
                              Ernst & Young LLP



Riverside, California
March 28, 2001
#### Donald Dewitt ALFRED, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

No. 28074.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1956.

Florence,, & Florence, Gilmer, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, ' for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
#### LOUIS F. KILHAM III *v.*JOAN A. KILHAM

(14461)

Dupont, C. J., and Spear and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 13

decision released March 12, 1996

*Robert H. Weinstein*and *Daniel H. Cohan*filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Margaret A. Waldron*filed a brief for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.