alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Global Assets
& Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 17, 2004


/s/ Bertram Cutler
-----------------------
Bertram Cutler,
President, CEO, & CFO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1619 

To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to require commemorative works in the District of Columbia and its environs to be constructed 

of materials that are grown, produced, or manufactured in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. KILDEE (for himself, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, to 

require commemorative works in the District of Columbia 

and its environs to be constructed of materials that are 

grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Monuments Assembled 

5 and Domestically Engineered Act’’ or the ‘‘MADE Act’’. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1619 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR USE OF AMERICAN MATERIALS 

2 IN CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN COMMEMO3 RATIVE WORKS. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENT.— 

5 (1) DECISION CRITERIA.—Section 8905(b) of 

6 title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(8) AMERICAN MATERIALS.—A commemora9 tive work shall be constructed using material— 

10 ‘‘(A) that, in the case of unmanufactured 

11 material, is mined or produced in the United 

12 States; and 

13 ‘‘(B) that, in the case of manufactured 

14 material, is manufactured in the United States 

15 substantially all from articles, materials, or sup16 plies mined, produced, or manufactured, as the 

17 case may be, in the United States.’’. 

18 (2) CRITERIA FOR ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION

19 PERMIT.—Section 8906(3) of such title is amended 

20 by inserting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, 

21 and such contract documents demonstrate that the 

22 material to be used in the construction of the com23 memorative work complies with the criteria de24 scribed in section 8905(b)(8) of this title, as deter25 mined in accordance with regulations implementing 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1619 IH

1 chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code (popu2 larly referred to as the ‘Buy American Act’)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to commemorative works for 

5 which construction permits are issued under section 8906 

6 of title 40, United States Code, on or after the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
#### Patsy J. SEMELSBERGER et vir, Appellants, v. Alton ANDERSON, Appellee.

No. 13028.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 16, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 13, 1956.

*959Benjamin D. Lucas, San Antonio, for appellants.

Perkins, Floyd & Davis, Kenneth Oden, Alice, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment which modified a former child custody order and awarded custody of a seven-year-old girl to the father for two summer months out of each year, and made certain adjustments for holiday visits. In 1950, Alton Anderson and Patsy Anderson were divorced and custody of their seventeen-month-old girl was awarded exclusively to the mother. The parents, one month later, caused an agreed order to be entered which granted the father visitation rights, but only in the mother’s home. The father, six years later, commenced this suit for a modified order, which the court granted after full hearing.

The record manifests faults on the part of the father concerning his support payments and on the part of the mother concerning interferences with the father’s visits. The record supports the relatively minor changes made with reference to the custody of the child. Conditions have changed since 1950. The father has remarried, has a home, and is better financially able to care for the child in a home. The mother has re-married. The former order permitted the father’s visits only in the mother’s home. In practice, the arrangement has been unworkable. The child! is now six years older.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet, Statement of operations, Statement of Cash Flows
and Notes thereto incorporated in Part  I, Item 1, of this
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001110189
<NAME> I-Trax.com., Inc

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,387,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,770,254
<PP&E>                                          56,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,876,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        17,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,665,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,876,045
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               636,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (636,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (636,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Huayang International Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wang Yufei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 19, 2004                                 /s/ Wang Yufei

                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Wang Yu fei
                                                       Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
#### LEONARD SUPRENANT ET AL. *v.*EDWARD K. KUHN ET AL.

(14359)

Foti, Landau and Heiman, Js.

Argued February 20

decision released March 26, 1996

*Bruce A. Chaplin,*with whom, on the brief, was *Tania Schmidt-Mpers,*law student intern, for the appellants (defendants).

*Charlotte Croman,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiffs awarding $2500 damages. They claim that the trial court improperly based its decision on an issue not raised in the pleadings, and abused its discretion in making certain findings. The defendants have failed to present a written memorandum of decision or a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the court explaining the factual basis for its decision. See Practice Book § 4059. We have consistently stated that it is the responsibility of the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. Practice Book § 4061; *Gelormino*v. *Blaustein,*31 Conn. App. 750, 751, 626 A.2d 1325 (1993); *State*v. *Rios,*30 Conn. App. 712, 715, 622 A.2d 618 (1993).

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Taz L. CHRISTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27495.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for passing a forged instrument; the punishment, 2 years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception and no brief has been filed on appellant’s behalf.

The evidence, viewed from the standpoint of the State, shows that appellant identified himself by a “driver’s license” as Jimmy G. Cross, and cashed the check offered in evidence at a Weingarten Store in Houston, which purported to be a check drawn by Rudy Dvorak, Painting Contractor, payable to Jimmy G. Cross as “wages for painting house”. The evidence shows further that the check was a forgery, and that Jimmy G. Cross had never worked for Dvorak. Process for Cross was not served, the information furnished the officer being that he was a young man and was in military service stationed in California.

Appellant denied that he cashed the check and testified that he had never been in the store; had never seen the check; did not know Jimmy G. Cross, and had never used his “driver’s license”.

The jury chose to accept the State’s testimony and the evidence sustains their verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03870]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2024 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 13975]]



FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 614 and 620

RIN 3052-AD54


Loan Policies and Operations

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notification of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA, we, or our) issued a 
final rule amending our regulations governing young, beginning, and 
small farmers and ranchers (YBS).

DATES: The final rule was published on December 27, 2023 (88 FR 89280), 
and is effective as of February 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Technical information: Jessica Tomlinson-Potter, Senior Policy 
Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, (703) 819-4667, TTY (703) 883-
4056, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74041b000011061e341217155a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="077768737362756d4761646629606871">[email protected]</span></a>.
    or
    Legal information: Hazem Isawi, Senior Attorney, Office of General 
Counsel, (703) 883-4022, TTY (703) 883-4056, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#08617b697f6160486e6b69266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69f8597819f9eb6909597d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 12, 2023, FCA issued a final rule 
amending our regulations at 12 CFR parts 614 and 620 governing service 
to YBS. The final rule clarifies the responsibilities of funding banks 
in the review and approval of direct lender association YBS programs, 
strengthens funding bank internal controls, and bolsters YBS business 
planning.
    In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252(c)(1), the effective date of the 
rule is no earlier than 30 days from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in 
session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the 
effective date of the regulations is February 14, 2024.

    Dated: February 21, 2024.
Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board, Farm Credit Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-03870 Filed 2-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                        1,551,967 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      0    
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,551,967 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,551,967 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0    
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                    1,551,967 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,551,967 
<SALES>                         108,546 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                108,546 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                294,396 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (185,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (196,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                      206 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (196,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      9.65 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      9.65 

        


</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1673 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

16300 Broadway Avenue in Maple Heights, Ohio, as the ‘‘Daniel Kondas 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Ms. FUDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 16300 Broadway Avenue in Maple Heights, 

Ohio, as the ‘‘Daniel Kondas Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DANIEL KONDAS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 16300 Broadway Avenue in 

6 Maple Heights, Ohio, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Daniel Kondas Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1673 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Daniel Kondas Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2736-046]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Waiver Period for Water Quality 
Certification Application

    On February 14, 2024, Idaho Power Company submitted to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) evidence of the date on which 
the certifying agency received the certification request for a Clean 
Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the 
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, in conjunction with the 
above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and sectionc 
4.34(b)(5), 5.23(b), 153.4, or 157.22 of the Commission's 
regulations,\1\ we hereby notify the Idaho Department of Environmental 
Quality of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5), 5.23(b), 153.4, and 157.22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: September 12, 2023.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year (September 12, 2024).
    If the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality fails or refuses 
to act on the water quality certification request on or before the 
above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived 
pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1341(a)(1).

    Dated: February 21, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-04046 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2005 

To reauthorize the Combating Autism Act of 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. DOYLE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Combating Autism Act of 2006. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combating Autism Re5 authorization Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE 

7 AND RESEARCH PROGRAM. 

8 Part R of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 280i et seq.) is amended— 

10 (1) in section 399AA(e), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘2014’’; 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2005 IH

1 (2) in section 399BB(g), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘2014’’; 

3 (3) in section 399CC(f), by striking ‘‘2011’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘2014’’; and 

5 (4) in section 399DD— 

6 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Not 

7 later than 4 years after the date of enactment 

8 of the Combating Autism Act of 2006’’ and in9 serting ‘‘Not later than 2 years after the date 

10 of enactment of the Combating Autism Reau11 thorization Act of 2011’’; and 

12 (B) in subsection (b), in paragraphs (4) 

13 and (5), by striking ‘‘the 4-year period begin14 ning on the date of enactment of this Act’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘the 6-year period beginning on the 

16 date of enactment of the Combating Autism Act 

17 of 2006’’. 

18 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

19 Section 399EE of the Public Health Service Act (42 

20 U.S.C. 280i–4) is amended to read as follows: 

21 ‘‘SEC. 399EE. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

22 ‘‘(a) DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE

23 AND RESEARCH PROGRAM.—To carry out section 399AA, 

24 there is authorized to be appropriated $22,000,000 for 

25 each of fiscal years 2012 through 2014. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2005 IH

1 ‘‘(b) AUTISM EDUCATION, EARLY DETECTION, AND

2 INTERVENTION.—To carry out section 399BB, there is 

3 authorized to be appropriated $48,000,000 for each of fis4 cal years 2011 through 2014. 

5 ‘‘(c) INTERAGENCY AUTISM COORDINATING COM6 MITTEE; CERTAIN OTHER PROGRAMS.—To carry out sec7 tions 399CC, 404H, and 409C, there is authorized to be 

8 appropriated $161,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 

9 through 2014.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS