alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:

Kevin, Bruce McGlasson <bmcglasson@flygrant.com> Tuesday, October 02, 2012 4:17PM Adams, Kevin (OST) Akun EAS bid 

# ,.-·\'\.HSPORTATlON
,**:~**

## /r:.··r 

# C'**r:n:R~·Tlr'Jl'JC'** • ...\./1 '•.C., }, L ll I. \- •• )

Atthis time, GrantAviation, Inc respectfully requests a one week extension ofthe deadline for EAS proposals between Dutch Harbor and theAkun /Akutan markets. Currently, there remain several unresolved issues between the USPS, DOT, and the independent contractors thatwill be involved in performance ofthis service. Thisrequest for extension of deadline may be sufficient for all involved to reach agreement or, barring that unlikely event, will allow GrantAviation the time to prepare several contingent bids allowing for whatever eventual resolution is reached between the parties. Thank you, Bruce McGlasson President Grant Aviation, Inc.

1
Example	of	an	Accessible	Sleeper	Compartment	– VIA	Rail	Canada	Inc.

By	Uwe	Rutenberg

(Drawings	and	pictures	used	with	permission	of	VIA	Rail	Canada	Inc.		These	

images	are	not	available	for	commercial	use.)

Fig.	1	Entrance, toilet	and	shower

 Entrance	door:	power	sliding	with	touch	control,	both	sides,	with	override	by	

VIA	personnel	in	case	of	emergency

 Toilet	height	18”

 Grab	bars	at	toilet	and	in	shower

 Pivoting	armrest	in	shower

 Flip	up/down	seat	in	shower

 Hand	held	shower	head	with	timer

 Shower	curtain	around	shower	stall

 Emergency	call	button	at	vanity	at	12”	from	floor
Fig.	2	Entrance	door	to	sleeper	compartment;	touch	button	for	power	sliding	doors
			

Fig.	3 Toilet,	18”	high 					 					Fig.	4 Shower	seat	and	support	bar

		

Fig.	5	Vanity	with	horizontal	grab	bar 			Fig.	6	Soap	dispenser	
Fig.	7	Large	touch	button	door	controls	on	both	sides	to	open/close	sliding	dividing	

door	between	toilet/shower	and	sleeper	compartment

				 																		

Fig.	8 Clear	60”	maneuvering	circle	in	 Fig.	9 Bed	height	same as	

front	of	bed wheelchair	seat:	18”

			 																				

Fig.	10 Adjustable	table	at	sofa/bed Fig.	11 Table	near	window
		 															

Fig.	12 Call	control	panel	near	bed/sofa Fig.	13 Dual	audio	and	visual	

In	Braille alarm	in	sleeper	and	restroom

section for	passengers	who	are	

blind	and	hearing	impaired
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                          36,309
<SECURITIES>                                    89,263
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,003
<INVENTORY>                                     32,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,387
<PP&E>                                          23,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     766,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,558
<SALES>                                        141,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,845
<CGS>                                           72,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    98
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (105,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,814)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.73)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>            5
            
    <S>                                              <C>
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUL-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                                     AUG-01-1997
    <PERIOD-END>                                       JUL-31-1998
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS             
    <CASH>                                                 10,992
    <SECURITIES>                                              488
    <RECEIVABLES>                                           8,564
    <ALLOWANCES>                                              295
    <INVENTORY>                                            0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       20,356
    <PP&E>                                                  1,035
    <DEPRECIATION>                                            640
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         25,503
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,222
    <BONDS>                                                0
    <COMMON>                                               6
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
    <PREFERRED>                                            0
    <OTHER-SE>                                             24,275
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           25,503
    <SALES>                                                34,313
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       34,313
    <CGS>                                                  22,135
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          31,394
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       (1,630)
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (547)
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                         2,167
    <INCOME-TAX>                                              964
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,203
    <DISCONTINUED>                                          0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
    <CHANGES>                                               0
    <NET-INCOME>                                            1,203
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .23
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                             .23
            

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 53192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21298]

[[Page 53192]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9916-25-ORD]

EPA Board of Scientific Counselors Advisory Board; Notice of 
Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, the EPA Board 
of Scientific Counselors (BOSC) Advisory Board is a necessary committee 
which is in the public interest. Accordingly, the BOSC will be renewed 
for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the BOSC is to 
provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator, through the 
Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development 
(ORD), regarding ORD science and engineering research, programs and 
plans, laboratories, and research management practices. Inquiries may 
be directed to Tom Tracy, U.S. EPA, (Mail Code 8104R), 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 564-
6518, or tracy.tom@epa.gov.

     Dated: April 24, 2014.
 Lek Kadeli,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development.

    Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by 
the Office of Federal Register on September 3, 2014.

[FR Doc. 2014-21298 Filed 9-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Susan M. Kanaya, Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kosan Biosciences
Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
#### Donley TILLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27318.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1954.

*72No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State’.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100. '

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Elbert KIMBERLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28135.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State!s Attorney, Austin, for the State.

*669PER CURIAM.

The offense is the possession for the purpose of sale of 'intoxicating liquor in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications

      I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Microwave Transmission Systems,
Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Microwave Transmission Systems, Inc.

By:  /s/ P. DAVID SPURLIN
     --------------------
     P. David Spurlin
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     Date: October 15, 2004

      I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Microwave Transmission Systems,
Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Microwave Transmission Systems, Inc.

By:  /s/ D. SUSAN KING
     -----------------
     D. Susan King
     Chief Financial Officer
     Date: October 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Alain CouderAlain CouderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Tommy BARRETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28693.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $300 and twenty days in jail.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1708 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1708

    To prohibit the use of funds to support Operation Odyssey Dawn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2011

  Mr. Rigell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of funds to support Operation Odyssey Dawn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDS TO SUPPORT OPERATION ODYSSEY DAWN.

    No funds available to the Department of Defense or any other United 
States Government department or agency may be used to support Operation 
Odyssey Dawn.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-03-0005-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 29, 2004

______________________________

ALBERTO GEORGE BARRON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NO. B 3664-0111; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Alberto George Barron filed a notice of appeal from his conviction in the

242nd District Court of Swisher County. The appeal was previously abated and remanded

to the trial court for further proceedings. 
-2-

Pursuant to the abatement and remand, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed with

this Court which contained an affidavit signed by appellant indicating that he no longer

wished to pursue this appeal. 

The appeal is dismissed. The appeal having been dismissed pursuant to appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained. Mandate will issue forthwith. 

Phil Johnson

Chief Justice

Do not publish.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130914 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROGER ROMANS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130914 

 COA: 256251 

Oakland CC: 03-051714-NO 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF 

HIGHLAND,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REINSTATE the order of the Oakland Circuit Court granting summary disposition to the 

defendant. As this Court explained in Horace v City of Pontiac, 456 Mich 744, 757 

(1998), "[a] danger of injury caused by the area in front of an entrance or exit is not a 

danger that is presented by a physical condition of the building itself." In Fane v Detroit 

Library Comm, 465 Mich 68, 78 (2001), this Court held that "in determining whether an 

item or area outside the four walls of a building is 'of a public building,' the courts should 

consider whether the item or area where the injury occurred is physically connected to 

and not intended to be removed from the building." Here, the alleged defect is the lack of 

a physical connection between the sidewalk and the covered entryway; thus, the area 

complained of is not physically connected to the building. Accordingly, the trial court 

correctly concluded that the gap between the sidewalk and the entryway is not a defect 

"of the public building." 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

l0926 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                                     |  |                                  |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -
|Name and State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation                |  | RegistrantsPercentage Ownership |  
|U. S. Subsidiaries                                                   |  |                                  |  
|C/P Products Corp, an Indiana corporation                            |  | 100                              | %
|United Sales and Warehouse of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation       |  | 100                              | %
|Foreign Subsidiaries:                                                |  |                                  |  
|The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc., Quebec, Canada          |  | 100                              | %
|Ai-wek a.k.a Eurasia Recreational Vehicle Accessories Taiwan Company |  | 100                              | %



In accordance with the
instructions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted those subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not have constituted a significant subsidiary as of December 31,
2004.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2163 

SUSAN SOLOMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the

United States,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00414-CMH)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Jason Mikolashek, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Susan Solomon appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Solomon’s

hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliatory

discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Solomon v. Gonzales, No. 1:06-cv-00414-CMH (E.D. Va.,

Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 of Pfizer Inc. dated November 18, 1991 (No. 33-44053), March 1, 2007 (No. 333-140987) and October 16, 2009 (No. 333-162520) of our report dated June 9, 2022, with respect to the statements of net assets available for plan benefits as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related statement of changes in net assets available for plan benefits for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes, and the accompanying supplemental schedule of Schedule H, Line 4i - Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year), which report appears in the December 31, 2021 annual report on Form 11-K of the Pfizer Savings Plan for Employees Resident in Puerto Rico.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Memphis, Tennessee June 9, 2022