alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT (11) - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  1996            1995            1994
                                                              ----------       ----------       --------
                           <S>                                <C>              <C>             <C>
                           Primary:
                           Average shares
                           outstanding............            9,296,346         9,298,122        9,305,746
                           Net effect of options..               10,539             4,230              170
                                                            ----------------------------------------------
                           Total..................            9,306,885         9,302,352        9,305,916
                                                            ==============================================
                           Net Income.............           11,151,000        11,482,000       10,125,000
                           Earnings Per Share.....          $      1.20       $      1.23      $      1.09
                                                            ==============================================
                           Fully Diluted:
                           Average shares
                           outstanding............            9,296,346         9,298,122        9,305,746
                           Net effect of options..               11,623             4,984              170
                                                            ----------------------------------------------
                           Total..................            9,307,969         9,303,106        9,305,916
                                                            ----------------------------------------------
                           Net Income.............           11,151,000        11,482,000       10,125,000
                           Earnings Per Share.....          $      1.20       $      1.23      $      1.09
                                                            ==============================================
</TABLE>
4 08/28/2012 11:51 FAX 3107256816 AWP-7 @] 002

P.O. Box 92007 

### u.s. Department ofTransportation Western-Pacific Region Office of Regional Counsel Los Angeles, CA**90009~2007** Federal Aviation AdminiStration 

### August 28, 2012 ,SENT VIA FAX AND FIRST CLASS MAIL,**~:;ederal** Aviation Administration**~!00** Independence Avenue, SW \Vasbin.gton, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Pax:202-493-5142 and Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings,**M~20** tr.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Bldg., Ground 

### Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 

### Fax: 202-366-7536 RE: In. the· Matter ofM&M 

### Tanks. 

### ln..£.. FAA Docket Number: 

### TO BE ASSIGNED 

### DMS No.**FAA~2011-lll8** (310) 725-7105 (310) 725·6816 facsimile



## 1J**--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----··-** -·------- Please be advised *atthe parties have reached a settlement in the above referenced matter. In accordance with 14 C.F.R. 13.215, the FAA hereby withdraws the complaint in the above referenced matter. 

### Si11cerely,**NAOMIT~UD** 

### Regional

. nsel**~** 

### .... 

# II ' /: /

..."\
I 

### I :/ : .I

. _) i I /1 · 

## ;t;]_ _j_ By:

# l~lfl/J¥1//**·-------~**

# ... = Cl.ifistopher Merrill Attorney

cc: Stanford M. 

### J. Manuia, Esq., 701 Bishop Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, Fax: 808-532-4704
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim D. Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of each of Insight Midwest, L.P. and Insight Capital, Inc. (together, the
Registrants), hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrants for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2002 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrants.








/s/Name: Kim D. KellyTitle: Chief Executive Officer








Subscribed and sworn to


before me on


August 8, 2002.











/s/Notary Public
Exhibit 32.2



The Coast Distribution System, Inc.



Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2004,

as Amended on Form 10-K/A



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 26, 2005



/s/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. KnellExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, David Ryon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ DAVID RYON
----------------
David Ryon
Chief Executive Officer, President
Principal Financial Officer
Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.
Kingston, NY
August 13, 2003





<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shannon
W. Farrington, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



/s/ Shannon W. Farrington
Shannon W. Farrington
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2004
January 15, 2014 BY FACSIMILE Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office des transports du Canada

Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Gretch Reference: OST2006-24269 Canadian Transportation Agency
M4820-U5-19

This letterconfirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applicationsby United States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions ofthe Air Transport Agreement between Canada and the United States ofAmerica, signed March 12, 2007 (Agreement). In addition, as estalblished in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis ofcomity and reciprocity.
G Manager International Agreements

cc Martin Loken, ANA Marc Rioux, ACEA. Brian Hedberg, US DoT Robert Finamore, US DOT
Ottawa (Ontario)**~1**A ON9 www.otc.gc.ca Ottawa Ontario K1A ON9 www.cta.gc.ca 

# Canada
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ Michael L. DeMarco
-------------------------
Michael L. DeMarco,
Chief Financial Officer

                                       29
EXHIBIT 32.2

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2008

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, hereby certifies that: (i) the Annual Report of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on Form 10-K with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information
contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | /s/ SANDRA A. KNELL                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|                     |  | Sandra A. Knell, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|                     | 
|                     |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and will be retained by The Coast Distribution System,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20211 Conference Calendar

RAY ALLEN DRGAC Plaintiff-Appellant

v. OWEN MURRAY, Director Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CV-554
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ray Allen Drgac, Texas prisoner # 721604, f iled a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Owen Murray, director of the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB). Drgac alleged that he suffers from tinnitus and that the medical staff at the Ellis Unit had failed to provide him with adequate medical
care. He thus argued that they had shown deliberate indifference to his serious medical need. The district court dismissed Drgac’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-20211

2 On appeal, Drgac reiterates his argument that, despite his receipt of antibioticear drops and other medicines, he was not treated for tinnitus because the medicines he was given were not made specifically to treat that condition. He seeks to have this court order UTMB to furnish him with one of several medications that he thinks would work better than those he had been given. He also seeks to have this court order UTMB to recommend a medical transfer to
a quieter prison unit and cell location. He prays for this relief despite the opinion of the Ellis Unit medical staff that such relief was not indicated. We reviewthe district court’s dismissal de novo. SeeRuiz v. United States, 160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998). Drgac failed to state a claim against the only named defendant by failing toallege any personal involvement by the defendant and by failing to attribute the constitutional violation he alleges to any policy implemented by the defendant. See Thompkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987); Thompson v. Steele , 709 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1983). Further, Drgac’s deliberate-indifference arguments are premised upon his disagreement with the treatment deemed appropriate by the Ellis Unit medical staff. He has thus failed to state a constitutional claim. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Drgac has moved for the appointment ofcounsel, and that motion is DENIED. The district court’s dismissal ofDrgac’s complaint counts as a strike for purposes of28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Drgac isWARNED that ifhe accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03907]



[[Page 14513]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Topics in Drug Disposition and Toxicity.
    Date: March 8, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Stacey Nicole Williams, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 867-5309, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d7e796c6e6874237a646161646c607e4d636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe8d8a9f9d9b87d089979292979f938dbe909796d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

     Dated: February 21, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03907 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Johnny Leo HILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 39268.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1966.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, 25 years.

Appellant entered his plea of guilty before the court without the intervention of a jury, and the court heard evidence in accordance with the provisions of Article 12, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

Witness Chapman, President of the Ire-dell State Bank, testified that the appellant appeared at his bank on the morning of January 20, 1965, in the company of another man and that they robbed the bank at gunpoint of $16,350.00.

The State introduced the confession of appellant wherein he admitted committing the robbery and detailed the manner and means by which he and his companion had perpetrated the same.

The evidence is sufficient to support the court’s finding of appellant’s guilt.

In the transcript we find a “Motion and Plea of Former Jeopardy” alleging a former conviction in Federal Court. Nowhere in the statement of facts do we find any evidence that the allegation of the motion or plea was true; therefore, the question is not before this Court for con*945sideration. Villarreal v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 213, 355 S.W.2d 516. If it were true, it would constitute no defense. Garrett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 387 S.W.2d 53, and cases there cited. This being so, we are not called upon to pass upon the question of the propriety of a special plea where a plea of guilty is entered.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
# L_2018073EN.01003901.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/39

---

NOTE TO THE READER

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 155/2016 has been withdrawn and therefore left blank.

---
#### Bennie WILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28645.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1956.

*831C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of theft of property of the value of $50 or over; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The property alleged and proved to have been stolen was 221 1⁄2 pounds of dressed poultry of the value of 30 cents per pound.

The question raised by appellant is bottomed upon Arts. 1420 and 1423 P.C., the contention being that the prosecution should have been for theft of chickens under Art. 1442b V.A.P.C., or for theft of edible meat under Art. 1426c V.A.P.C.

A particular penalty different from that applicable to ordinary theft is provided in Art. 1442b V.A.P.C. for chicken theft, and in Art. 1426c V.A.P.C. for theft of “edible meat”. If, therefore, “dressed poultry” (chickens killed and prepared for cooking) is property which comes under the definition of “chickens” or of “edible meat”, as such words are used in the above statutes, appellant was entitled to be tried under the applicable statute and to have the jury charged as to the particular punishment prescribed for chicken theft or theft of edible' meat. Arts. 1420 and 1423 V.A.P.C.

Appellant’s contention that the offense was theft of chickens is answered contrary to his position in Noble v. State, 81 Tex. Cr.R. 28, 192 S.W. 1073, and in Powe v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 346, 175 S.W.2d 78, where it was held that to sustain .a conviction for theft of a hog the evidence must show the taking of a live hog and before it became pork.

Article 1426c V.A.P.C. provides a punishment for theft of “any wool or mohair or edible meat.”

As used in this statute, meat refers to-“the flesh of animals used as food — as distinguished from fish or fowl” which is one of the definitions of “meat” found in Webster’s New International Dictionary.

We conclude that prosecution for theft of dressed poultry, of the value of more than $50, under the general theft statute was proper and that the punishment for such theft is found in Article 1421 P.C.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,711,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    624,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,467,081
<PP&E>                                         246,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,653,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,030,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    958,085
<COMMON>                                     4,290,012
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,049,872)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,653,906
<SALES>                                     12,867,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,237,761
<CGS>                                        9,234,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,234,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               299,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (923,894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (523,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (567,518)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,091,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
September 18, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RAYMOND FIELD, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00712-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. 

Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.