alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1844 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1844

To amend the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 to 
clarify that a notice of arrival is not required for certain documented 
         vessels unless arriving from a foreign port or place.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2011

 Mr. Boustany introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 to 
clarify that a notice of arrival is not required for certain documented 
         vessels unless arriving from a foreign port or place.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Notice of Arrival Act'' or the ``NOA 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NOTICE OF ARRIVAL FOR VESSELS ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 109(b) of the Security and Accountability for Every Port 
Act of 2006 (33 U.S.C. 1223 note; 120 Stat. 1893) is amended by 
striking ``Act.'' and inserting ``Act, but shall not require a notice 
of arrival on the Outer Continental Shelf for vessels documented under 
section 12105 of title 46, United States Code, unless such vessels are 
to arrive from a foreign port or place.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven Kass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Tofutti Brands Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

March 21, 2006

/s/Steven Kass*
--------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Transition Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the six months ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

March 3, 2006                    /s/Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                                      E-37
#### Thomas Marlon COMBES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28060.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1956.

*950'No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for drunken driving upon a public road in Gregg County.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.

The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at three days’ confinement in jail and a fine of $50.

When the trial court came to enter judgment on such verdict, however, no reference was made to that portion of the punishment assessing confinement in jail for three days.

A trial court may not receive a verdict and give effect to part of it and ignore some other part and enter another and different judgment from that called for by the verdict. Cagle v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 140, 179 S.W.2d 545; Hardy v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 54, 261 S.W.2d 172.

We have concluded, however, that this court has the power and authority to reform the judgment so as to follow the verdict and impose the punishment assessed by the verdict. Accordingly, the judgment is reformed so as to fix appellant’s punishment at confinement in jail for a term of three days and a fine of $50.

As so reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13567

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01533-SDM-JSS

SAGO NETWORKS, LLC, 

a Florida limited liability company, 

 Plaintiff,

AMERICAN INFOAGE, LLC, 

a Florida limited liability company, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

REGIONS BANK, 

an Alabama banking corporation, 

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(May 27, 2016)

Case: 15-13567 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HUCK,∗ District 

Judge.

PER CURIAM: 

American Infoage, LLC, brought this lawsuit against Regions Bank after 

Regions imposed a “swap breakage fee” under the parties’ written swap 

agreements. Infoage asserted claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach 

of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings, and 

unjust enrichment. The district court granted partial summary judgment to 

Regions with respect to some of the claims and, after a bench trial, entered 

judgment in favor of Regions on the rest of the claims. This is Infoage’s appeal.1

 

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the 

district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Regions, which was 

filed on September 25, 2014, as well as its judgment in favor of Regions based on 

its thorough and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law filed on July 

9, 2015. 

AFFIRMED.2

 ∗ Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of 

Florida, sitting by designation.

1 The district court also entered judgment against another plaintiff, Sago Networks, LLC, 

on an unrelated claim and Sago appealed. In a previous order, this Court granted Sago’s motion 

to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. 

2 This case was originally scheduled for oral argument but was removed from the oral 

argument calendar by unanimous consent of the panel under 11th Circuit Rule 34-3(f). 

Case: 15-13567 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Page: 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 4, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20956

ADAM DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BRADFORD, Police Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHRIS CONNEALY, Fire Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, #6; RAFAEL GAITAN, Chief; WILLIAM DOWLING; SAMUEL ADAMS; WAYLAND KELLEY; RALPH CUNNINGHAM; W. J. BEARDEN; S. WILSON; VANCE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-3312

-------------------- Before JOLLY, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Adam Daniels, Texas inmate # 619572, appeals from the summary judgment granted in favor of some but not all defendants in his civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court must examine the basis for its appellate jurisdiction sua sponte if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals from “final decisions of the district courts.”No. 03-20956 -2- Brown v. Miss. Valley State Univ. , 311 F.3d 328, 331 (5th Cir. 2002)(internal quotation and citation omitted). The district court’s “Memorandum and Order on Partial Dismissal” is not a final judgment. See id. ; see also F ED . R. C IV . P. 54(b). Accordingly, the instant appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All of Daniels’s outstanding motions are DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
DEP Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-85000 and No. 33-58894) on Form S-8 of DEP Corporation and subsidiaries of
our report dated September 20, 1996, except for Notes 1, 15 and 16, which date
is October 23, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of DEP
Corporation and subsidiaries as of July 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and
related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31,
1996, which report appears in the July 31, 1996 report on Form 10-K of DEP
Corporation and subsidiaries.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 17, 1997
Document Register Department of Environmental Quality Department Document 

### N0kc-Q04 

# - 13- 1 pLLb (. 

### 8 eav M 

## D-/ r 0-2 

### @/m 

## D-2- '. 

## D--3

- 

## D--4 w 45% 

### D-5 'b 

### -6 

# - 0

### - -j' Date Routed Signature of Receiver
Exhibit 3.2(a)

                         BANCORP RHODE ISLAND, INC.
                               BYLAW AMENDMENT
                           (Adopted July 15, 2003)

Article V of the Company's Bylaws be, and the same hereby is, amended as
follows:

      (i)   The first sentence of Section 5.01 of Article V be amended in
            its entirety to read as follows:

                  "The officers of the Company shall include a Chairman of
                  the Board and one or more Vice Chairmen of the Board (if
                  elected pursuant to Section 5.07), a President, a
                  Treasurer and a Secretary and such other officers, if any,
                  including, without limitation, a Chief Executive Officer,
                  a Chief Operating Officer, and one or more Vice Presidents
                  (the number thereof and variations in title to be
                  determined by the Board of Directors), as the Company may
                  find necessary for the management of its affairs."

      (ii)  Section 5.07 of Article V be amended in its entirety to read as
            follows:

                  "SECTION 5.07.  Chairman and Vice Chairmen of the Board.
                  The Board of Directors may annually elect a Chairman of
                  the Board and one or more Vice Chairmen of the Board (the
                  number thereof and variations in title to be determined by
                  the Board of Directors). The Chairman of the Board and any
                  Vice Chairman shall have the duties and powers specified
                  in these By-Laws and as may be determined by the Board of
                  Directors.  The Chairman shall, when present, preside at
                  all meetings of the Board of Directors and at all meetings
                  of the shareholders.  In the absence of the Chairman of
                  the Board, the Vice Chairman or if more than one Vice
                  Chairman has been elected, the most senior Vice Chairman
                  (determined by title or in order of election) shall, when
                  present, preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors
                  and at all meetings of the shareholders."

      (iii) The second sentence of Section 5.08 of Article V be amended in
            its entirety to read as follows:

                  "If there be no Chairman of the Board or, in the absence
                  of the Chairman of the Board and any Vice Chairman of the
                  Board, the President shall preside at all meetings of the
                  Board of Directors and at all meetings of the shareholders
                  and shall have such additional powers and shall perform
                  further duties as may from time to time be assigned to him
                  or her by the Board of Directors."


<PAGE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*ALCIDE LEMIEUX

(14407)

Lavery, Schaller and Stoughton, Js.

Argued February 21

decision released March 12, 1996

*M. Donald Cardwell,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Leon F. Dalbec, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *James E. Thomas,*state’s attorney, and *Mark Brodsky,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1(*)






Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
      Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Subrah
      S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the
      best of my knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:
      May
      9, 2006










/s/ SUBRAH
      S. IYAR






Subrah
      S.
      Iyar






Chief
      Executive Officer













































_____________________________






(*)
      In
      accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
      33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
      Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.1 is deemed to accompany
      this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether
      made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
      specifically incorporates it by reference.
































Form
          10-Q
          for quarter ended March 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13085-13086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Comptroller General's Advisory Council on Standards for Internal 
Control in the Federal Government; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Comptroller General's Advisory Council on Standards for 
Internal Control in the Federal Government will hold a meeting on 
Tuesday, March 12, 2024, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. to discuss 
proposed updates and revisions to the Standards for Internal Control in 
the Federal Government (known as the Green Book). The meeting will be 
virtual and is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, from 11:00 
a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

[[Page 13086]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will be virtual only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the meeting 
or the Green Book, please contact Carrie Morrison, Assistant Director, 
Financial Management and Assurance, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c18caeb3b3a8b2aeaf8281a6a0aeefa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cd1f3eeeef5eff3f2dfdcfbfdf3b2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 512-
4689. To request a reasonable accommodation (RA) for this meeting, 
email GAO's RA office at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40122521332f2e21222c250123232f2d2d2f242134292f2e330027212f6e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84d6e1e5f7ebeae5e6e8e1c5e7e7ebe9e9ebe0e5f0edebeaf7c4e3e5ebaae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
request all accommodations at least 5 business days prior to the 
meeting (by March 5th).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any interested person may attend the virtual 
meeting as an observer. Members of the public will have an opportunity 
to address the Council with brief (5 minute) presentations on matters 
directly related to the proposed updates and revisions. Any interested 
person who plans to attend the virtual meeting as an observer must 
contact Carrie Morrison, Assistant Director, at (202) 512-4689, before 
March 5, 2024. The meeting agenda will be available upon request one 
week before the meeting.
    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3512(c), (d).

James Dalkin,
Director, Financial Management and Assurance, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office.
[FR Doc. 2024-03494 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0386 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NE-09-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Initial Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 3,000 $255,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $255,000

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LARRY HALL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 863

[ November 22, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 6565CF10A

.

Larry Hall, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.