alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: May 10, 2004           /s/ Linda L. Perry
                              ________________________________________________
                              Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13762-13763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service

[[Page 13763]]

Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products 
List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 23, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 188 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-189, CP2024-195.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-03655 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.3

I, Bruce J. Klatsky, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  December 15, 2003

| | /s/ Bruce J. Klatsky                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Bruce J. Klatsky                    
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Elgene CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28840.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 20, 1957.

E. A. Blair, Lubbock, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $75.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Bill of exception No. 1 complains of the action of the trial court in declining to grant appellant’s motion for continuance predicated upon the absence of the appellant’s witness Bull Johnson.

In the absence of a statement of facts on the trial, we are in no position to pass upon action of the court complained of in the bill. Ward v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 593, 68 S.W.2d 1046. In Davis v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 215, 109 S.W.2d 756, 757; we quoted from Branch’s Annotated Penal Code as follows:

> “It is not in every case, however, where the absent testimony is material and probably true, that the appellate court will revise the ruling of the trial judge, in denying a continuance ajid a new trial to defendant. It is only in a case where, from the evidence adduced on the trial, the appellate court is impressed with the conviction, not merely that the defendant might pos*829sibly have been prejudiced in his rights by such ruling, but that it was reasonably probable that if the absent testimony had been before the jury a verdict more favorable to the defendant would have resulted.”

The cases cited by the appellant all reflect in the opinions that a statement of facts was presented to this Court on appeal. We have checked the files of this Court and have determined that such was the case in Jeter v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 559, 170 S.W.2d 772.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM TOFUTTI
BRANDS  INC.'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                   1,693,000
<SECURITIES>                               253,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,031,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               200,000
<INVENTORY>                                566,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,531,000
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,675,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      473,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    63,000
<OTHER-SE>                               3,131,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,675,000
<SALES>                                 11,912,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        11,912,000
<CGS>                                    7,349,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         3,139,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (12,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,436,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               586,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        850,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               850,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .12



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.01

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Russell L. Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Power Save
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's certifying officer is responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's certifying officer has disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect eh registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's certifying officer has indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ RUSSELL L. SMITH
------------------------
Russell L. Smith

                                       17
**Exhibit 31.3**

**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael S.Willner certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

|        | /s/ MICHAEL S. WILLNER                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S.  Willner                        |
|   | Vice Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Insight  Capital, Inc.                |
|   | November 14,  2006                    |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
      A.
      Gestetner, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Chairman of the
      Board of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                August 1, 2008By:
            /s/
                David A. GestetnerName:
            David
                A. GestetnerTitle:
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer, Secretary,and
                Chairman of the Board(Principal
                Executive, Financial,and
                Accounting Officer)




-16-
1 

Filed 1/29/14 P. v. Beatty CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Glenn) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 v. 

ROBERTA ANN BEATTY, 

 Defendant and Respondent. 

C073301 

(Super. Ct. No. 10NCR08286) 

 In August 2010, defendant Roberta Ann Beatty was charged with two felony 

offenses: commercial burglary and forgery of a prescription for drugs. In January 2011, 

defendant pled no contest to both charges. In March 2011, the trial court suspended 

imposition of sentence and placed defendant on three years of formal probation. Among 

the terms and conditions of her probation, defendant was required to complete Glenn 

County’s felony drug court program. 

 Twenty-one months later, on October 3, 2012, defendant appeared in the trial 

court for her “drug court graduation.” Defendant, her counsel, and probation were 

present at the graduation; the People were not represented. At the graduation hearing, 

defendant’s counsel made an oral motion to reduce the felony charges to misdemeanors 
2 

and dismiss them. The trial court granted counsel’s motion. On December 31, 2012, the 

trial court issued a written order reducing the felony charges to misdemeanors, dismissed 

the charges, and discharged defendant from probation in the interests of justice. 

 The People appeal from the December 31, 2012 order. On appeal, the People 

contend the trial court erred in reducing defendant’s charges to misdemeanors without 

giving the People two days’ written notice as mandated by Penal Code section 1203.3, 

subdivision (b)(1). The People further contend the trial court erred in dismissing the 

charges against defendant without giving the People 15 days’ notice of the petition to 

dismiss the charges, notice that is required by Penal Code section 1203.4, 

subdivision (e)(1). Defendant did not respond to the appeal. 

 After reviewing the law and the record in this appeal, we agree the trial court erred 

in both respects. 

DISPOSITION 

 The order reducing the charged offenses to misdemeanors and dismissing those 

same charges is reversed and the felony charges are reinstated. Probation also is 

reinstated. The matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to set for hearing 

within 60 days of the remittitur, defendant’s motions to reduce the charged offenses to 

misdemeanors and to dismiss them. 

 ROBIE , J. 

We concur: 

 BLEASE , Acting P. J. 

 BUTZ , J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2096

KAZEEM ISHOLA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A73-534-825)

Submitted: May 7, 2007 Decided: May 15, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kazeem Ishola, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kazeem Ishola, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)

affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no

abuse of discretion in the Board’s affirmance of the IJ’s order.

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d

475, 481, 483 (4th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review, and deny as

moot Ishola’s motions to suspend the briefing order and for a stay

of deportation. We grant Ishola leave to proceed on appeal in

forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED