P. 1



# OAR Box 1669 Prepped byCharmelie Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# <g{JX\) N-F- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/20089:36:49AM

Sheet 91 of 110P. 2

6560-50- P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC Y 4 0 CF RPar t 6 3 [FRL - ] RI N 2060-AH4 1 Nationa l Emissio nStandard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n(Non-Gasoline ) AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA) . ACTION : Propose d rule . SUMMARY : Thi s actio n propose s nationa l emissio nstandard s fo r hazardou s ai r pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo r organi c liquid s distributio n(OLD ) (non-gasoline ) operations , whic har e carrie d ou t a t storag e terminals , refineries , crud e oi l pipelin e stations , and variou s manufacturin g facilities . Thes e propose d standard s woul d implemen t sectio n112(d ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t (CAA ) byrequirin g al l OL D operation s a t plan t site s tha t ar e majo r source s t o mee t hazardou s ai r pollutan t (HAP ) emissio n standard s reflectin g th e applicatio no f th e maximu machievabl e contro l technolog y (MACT) . Th e EP Aestimate s tha t approximatel y70,20 0 megagram s pe r yea r (Mg/yr ) (77,30 0 ton s pe r yea r (tpy) ) o f HA P ar e emitte d fro mfacilitie s i n thi s sourc e category . Althoug ha larg e numbe r o f organi c HA P ar e emitte d nationwid e fro m thes e operations , benzene , ethylbenzene , toluene , viny lP. 3



### 2 chloride , an

d xylene s ar e among the mos t prevalent . Thes e HAP have bee n show

n t o have a variet yo f carcinogeni c an d noncance r advers e healt heffects . The EP Aestimate s tha t thes e propose d standard s woul d resul t i n the reduction o f HA P emission s fro

mmajo r source s i nthe OL D sourc e categor yb y2 8 percent . The emission s reduction s achieve d b ythes e propose d standards , whe n combine d wit hthe emission s reduction s achieve d b yothe r simila r standards , woul d provid e protectio n t o th e publi c an d achiev e a primarygoa l o f the CAA . DATES : Comments . Submi t comment s on o r befor e [INSER T DAT E 6 0 DAY S AFTE RPUBLICATIO NI NFEDERA

L REGISTER] . Publi c Hearing . I f anyon e contact s the EP Arequesting t o speak a t a publi c hearing b y[INSER

T DATE 2 0 DAY S AFTE R PUBLICATIO

NI NFEDERA

L REGISTER] , a publi c hearing wil l b e hel d on [INSER

T DAT E 3 0 DAY S AFTE RPUBLICATIO NINFEDERA

L REGISTER] . ADDRESSES : Comments . B yU.S . Posta l Service , sen d comment s (i n duplicat e i f possible ) to : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke t an d Informatio nCente r (6102) , Attentio n Docke t Numbe r A-98-13 , U.S . EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani a Avenue , NW , Washington , DC 20460 . I n perso n o r b ycourier , delive r comment s (i n duplicat e i f possible ) to : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke t an d Informatio n Cente r (6102) , Attentio nDocke t Numbe r A-98-13 ,

^P. 4



### 3 U.S . EPA , 40 1 MStreet , SW , Washingto n DC 20460 . The EPA request s tha t a separat e cop yals o b e sen t t o th e contac t perso n liste d below(see FO RFURTHE RINFORMATIO NCONTACT) . Publi c Hearing . I f a publi c hearing i s held , i t wil l b e hel d a t 10:0 0 a.m . i n the EPA' s Offic e o f Administratio n Auditorium , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina , o r a t a n alternat e sit e nearby . Docket . Docke t No . A-98-1 3 contain s supporting informatio n use d i n developing the standards . The docke t i s locate d a t th e U.S . EPA , 40 1 MStreet , SW , Washington , DC 20460 , i n RoomM-1500 , Watersid e Mal l (groun d floor) , an

d mayb e inspecte d fro

m8:3 0 a.m . t o 5:3 0 p.m. , Monda ythrough Friday , excep t fo r lega l holidays . FO RFURTHE

RINFORMATIO

N CONTACT : Ms . Martha Smith , Wast e an d Chemica l Processe s Group , Emissio n Standard s Divisio n (MD-13) , U.S . EPA , Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 27711 ; phon e (919 ) 541-2421 , e-mai l "smith.martha@epa.gov. " SUPPLEMENTAR

YINFORMATION : Comments . Comment s an d dat a maybe submitte d b yelectroni c mai l (e-mail ) to : a-and-r-docket(jjepa . gov . Electroni c comment s mus t b e submitte d a s a nASCI I fil e t o avoi d the us e o f specia l character s an d encryptio n problems . Comment s wil l als o b e accepte d on disk s i n WordPerfect ®Core l 8 fil e format . Al l comment s an d dat a submitte d i n electroni c for m 

# 3P. 5

4
mus t not e th e docke t number : A-98-13 . N o confidentia l busines s informatio n (CBI ) shoul d b e submitte d bye-mail . Electroni c comment s ma yb e file d onlin e a t man yFedera l Depositor ylibraries . Commenter s wishin g t o submi t proprietar yinformatio n fo r consideratio nmus t clearl ydistinguis hsuc hinformatio n fro m othe r comment s and clearl ylabe l i t a s CBI . Sen d submission s containin g suc hproprietar yinformatio ndirectl y t o th e followin g address , and no t t o th e publi c docket , t o ensur e tha t proprietar yinformatio n i s no t inadvertentl y place d i nth e docket : Attention : OAQP S Documen t Contro l Officer , Attn : Ms . Marth a Smith , U.S . EPA , 41 1 W . Chape l Hil l Street , Roo m 740B , Durham , N C 27701 . Th e EP Awil l disclos e informatio nidentifie d a s CB I onl yt o th e exten t allowe d byth e procedure s se t fort hi n4 0 CF Rpar t 2 . I f n o clai mo f confidentialit yaccompanie s a submissio nwhe ni t i s receive d byth e EPA , th e informatio nma yb e mad e availabl e t o th e publi c withou t furthe r notic e t o th e commenter . Publi c Hearing . Person s intereste d i npresentin g ora l testimon yo r inquirin g a s t o whethe r a hearin g i s t o b e hel d shoul d contac t Ms . JoLyn n Collin s o f th e EP Aa t (919 ) 541

- 567 1 a t leas t 2 day s i n advanc e o f th e publi c hearing . Person s intereste d i n attendin g th e publi c hearin g mus t als o cal l Ms . Collin s t o verif yth e time , date , an d locatio no f 

# 1P. 6



### 5 the hearing . The publi c hearing wil l provid e intereste d partie s the opportunit yt o presen t data , views , o r argument s concerning thes e propose d emissio nstandards . Docket . Th e docke t i s a norganize d an

d complet e fil e o f al l the informatio nconsidere d b ythe EP

Ai nthe developmen t o f thi s rulemaking . The docke t i s a dynami c fil e becaus e materia l i s adde d throughou t the rulemaking process . Th e docketing system

i s intende d t o allowmember s o f the publi c an d industrie s involve d t o readil yidentif yan d locat e document s s o tha t theycaneffectivel yparticipat e i n the rulemaking process . Along wit hthe propose d an d promulgate d standard s an

d thei r preambles , the content s o f the docke t wil l serve a s the record i nthe cas e o f judicia l review . (Se e sectio n 307(d)(7)(A ) o f the CAA. ) The regulatorytex t an d othe r material s relate d t o thi s rulemaking ar e availabl e fo r revie wi n the docket , o r copie s mayb e maile d on reques t fromthe Ai r Docke t b ycalling (202 ) 260-7548 . Areasonabl e fe e mayb e charge d fo r copying docke t materials . Worl d Wid e We b(WWW) . I n additio n t o being availabl e i nthe docket , anelectroni c cop yo f thi s propose d rul e i s als o availabl e on the WW Wthroug

hthe Technolog

yTransfe r Networ k (TTN) . Th e TT

Nprovide s informatio n an d technolog

yexchang e i n variou s area s o f ai r pollutio ncontrol . Following signature , a cop

yo f the rul e wil l be poste d onthe TTN' s 

# SP. 7

6 polic yand guidanc e pag e fo r newl ypropose d o r promulgate d rules : http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg . I f mor e informatio n regardin g th e TTNi s needed , cal l th e TTNHEL P lin e a t (919 ) 541-5384 . Titl e Change . Fo r purpose s o f thi s propose d rule , th e titl e ha s bee nchange d t o "Nationa l Emissio nStandard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline) " t o bette r describ e th e affecte d population . Th e sourc e categor ylis t and regulator yagend a wil l b e amende d t o reflec t thi s nam e chang e i na separat e action . Backgroun d Information . Th e backgroun d informatio nfo r th e propose d standard s i s no t containe d i na forma l backgroun d informatio ndocumen t (BID) . Instead , w e hav e prepare d technica l memorand a coverin g th e followin g topi c areas :

• Industr ydescriptio n Mode l OL D plant s

• Industr ybaselin e emission s

• Emissio ncontro l option s MAC T floo r determinatio n Environmental , energy , and cos t impact s

• Economi c impacts . Thes e memo s hav e bee n combine d int o a technica l suppor t documen t (TSD ) , whic hi s include d i n Docke t No . A-98-13 . I naddition , ther e ar e severa l othe r memo s tha t discus s



## PP. 8

7 individua l issues, suc ha s selectio no f th e affecte d organi c HA P an d th e minimumHA P cutof f definin g th e affecte d organi c liquids. : Eac ho f thes e technica l memo s ha s als o bee nplace d i nDocke t No . A-98-13 . Regulate d Entities . Categorie s and entitie s potentiall y regulate d bythi s actio n include : Example s o f regulate d entitie s Operation s a t majo r source s tha t transfe r organi c liquid s int o o r ou t o f the plan t site , including : liqui d storag e terminals , crud e oi l pipelin e stations , petroleu

m refineries , chemica l manufacturing facilities , an d othe r manufacturing facilitie s wit hcollocate d OLD operations . Categor y Industr y SIC *

282 1 286 5 286 9 291 1 422 6 461 2 516 9 517 1 NAICS *

32521 1 32519 2 32518 8 3241 1 49311 ' 4931 9 4861 1 4226 9 4227 1

Federa l Governmen t Federa l agencyfacilitie s tha t operat e an

yo f the type s o f entitie s liste d unde r th e "industry " categoryi nthi s table . *Considere d t o b e the primaryindustria l code s fo r the plan t site s wit h OL D operations , bu t the lis t i s no t necessaril yexhaustive . Thi s tabl e i s no t intende d t o b e exhaustive , bu t rathe r provide s a guid e fo r reader s regardin g entitie s likel yt o b e regulate d b

ythi s action . T o determin e whethe r you r facilit ywoul d b e regulate d bythi s action , yo u shoul d examin e th e applicabilit ycriteri a i n§63:233 4 o f th e propose d rule . I f yo u hav e anyquestion s regardin g th e applicabilit yo f thi s propose d actio nt o a particula r 

# 7P. 9

8 entity , consul t th e perso nliste d i nth e precedin g FO R FURTHE RINFORMATIO NCONTAC T sectio no r you r EP Aregiona l representativ e a s liste d i n §63.1 3 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t A(Genera l Provisions) . Outline . Th e followin g outlin e i s provide d t o assis t yo u i n readin g thi s preamble . I . Backgroun d A . Ho wwoul d thi s rul e relat e t o othe r EP Aregulator y actions ? B . Wha t i s th e sourc e o f authorit yfo r developmen t o f NESHAP ? C . Wha t criteri a ar e use d i nth e developmen t o f NESHAP ? D . Wha t ar e th e potentia l healt heffect s associate d wit h HA P emitte d fro mOL D operations ? II . Summar yo f th e Propose d Rul e A . Wha t sourc e categor ywoul d b e affecte d byth e propose d NESHAP ? B . Wha t ar e th e primar ysource s o f emission s an d wha t ar e th e emissions ? C . Wha t woul d b e th e affecte d source ? D . Wha t woul d b e th e emissio n limits , operatin g limits , and othe r standards ? E . Wha t woul d b e th e testin g and initia l complianc e requirements ? F . Wha t woul d b e th e continuou s complianc e provisions ? G . Wha t woul d b e th e notification , recordkeeping , an d reportin g requirements ? III . Rational e fo r Selectin g th e Propose d Standard s A . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e sourc e category ? B . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d pollutant s t o b e regulated ? C . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d affecte d source ? D . Ho wdi d w e determin e th e basi s and leve l o f th e propose d standard s fo r existin g and ne wsources ? E . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e forma t o f th e propose d standards ? F . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d testin g and initia l complianc e requirements ? G . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d continuou s complianc e requirements ? H . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d notification , recordkeeping , and reportin g requirements ? IV . Summar yo f Environmental , Energy , an d Economi c Impact sP.1 0

A . Wha t ar e th e ai r qualit yimpacts ? B . Wha t ar e th e cos t impacts ? C . Wha t ar e th e economi c impacts ? D . Wha t ar e th e nonai r qualit yhealth , environmental , an d energ yimpacts ? V . Administrativ e Requirement s A . Executiv e Orde r 12866 , Regulator yPlannin g and Revie w B . Executiv e Orde r 13132 , Federalis m C . Executiv e Orde r 13084 , Consultatio nand Coordinatio n wit hIndia nTriba l Government s D . Executiv e Orde r 13045 , Protectio no f Childre nfro m Environmenta l Healt hRisk s and Safet yRisk s E . Executiv e Orde r 13211 , Action s Concernin g Regulation s Tha t Significantl yAffec t Energ ySupply , Distribution , o r Us e F . Unfunde d Mandate s Refor mAc t o f 199 5 G . Regulator yFlexibilit yAc t (RFA ) a s amende d byth e Smal l Busines s Regulator yEnforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t o f 199 6 (SBREFA) , 5 U.S.C . 60 1 e t seg . H . Paperwor k Reductio nAc t I . ' Nationa l Technolog yTransfe r and Advancemen t Ac t I . Backgroun d A . Ho wwoul d thi s rul e relat e t o othe r EP Aregulator y actions ? Owner s an d operator s o f plan t site s whic hcontai n organi c liquid s distributio n activitie s tha t ar e potentiall y subjec t t o thes e propose d standard s fo r OL D operation s ma y als o b e subjec t t o othe r NESHA P becaus e o f othe r activitie s tha t tak e plac e o nth e sam e plan t site . Som e tan k farm s ar e use d t o stor e and transfe r organi c liquid s ont o o r of f a syntheti c organi c chemica l manufacturin g industr y(SOCMI ) plan t sit e tha t i s subjec t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpart s F , G , an d H—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Organi c Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fro mth e Syntheti c Organi c Chemica l Manufacturin g 

# °lP.1 1



### 1 0 Industry(commonlyreferre d t o a s the hazardou s organi c NESHAP , o r "HON") . Distributio n o f crud e oi l o r othe r organi c liquid s a t a petroleu mrefiner

ysubjec t t o 4 0 CFR par t 63 , subpar t CC—Nationa l Emissio nStandard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fro mPetroleu

m Refinerie s (th

e RefineryNESHAP) , mayals o com e unde r OL D NESHAP coverage . Finally , bul k gasolin e terminal s subjec t t o 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t R—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Gasolin e Distributio nFacilitie s (Bul k Gasolin e Terminal s an d Pipelin e Breakou t Stations ) ma ydistribut e non-gasolin e organi c liquid s throughdedicate d equipmen t whic hwoul d fal l unde r thes e propose d OLD standards . A t plan t site s subjec t t o bot hthe propose d OL D standard s an d anothe r NESHAP , the OL D NESHAP , whe n finalized , woul d appl yonl yt o the specifi c equipmen t an

d activitie s tha t ar e relate d directl yt o the distributio n o f affecte d non-gasolin e organi c liquid s (whic h include s liquid s move d eithe r ont o o r of f the site ) . Some existing NESHAP mayalread yregulate , an

d some NESHAP unde r developmen t ma yinten d t o regulate , equipmen t use d t o distribut e organi c liquid s (e.g. , certai nstorag e tank s o r transfe r rack s a t chemica l productio nfacilitie s subjec t t o the HON) . T o avoi d overla p o f requirement s i n thes e cases , the OLD NESHAP woul d no t apply ' t o an yOL D emissio n sourc e alread ycomplying wit hcontro l provision s 

# to

### 1 1

unde r anothe r par t 6 3 NESHAP . Fo r othe r applicabl e NESHAP tha t ar e no t ye t fina l an d whic hpotentiall ywoul d appl yt o OL D equipment , the NESHAP tha t have the earlies t complianc e dat e woul d apply . Th e Pollutio n Preventio nAc t o f 199 0 (4 2 U.S.C . 1310 1 e t seg. , Publi c Law101-508 , Novembe r 5 , 1990 ) establishe s th e nationa l policyo f the Unite d State s fo r pollutio n prevention . Thi s Ac t declare s that : (1 ) pollutio n shoul d b e prevente d o r reduce d wheneve r feasible ; (2 ) pollutio n tha t canno t b e prevente d o r reduce d shoul d b e recycle d o r reuse d i n anenvironmentally-saf e manne r whereve r feasible ; (3 ) pollutio n tha t canno t b e recycle d o r reuse d shoul d b e treated ; an

d (4 ) disposa l o r releas e int o th e atmospher e shoul d b e chose n onl ya s a las t resort . Th e OL D operation s covere d b ythes e propose d standard s distribut e organi c liquid s tha t ar e ofte nmanufacture d an d consume d b

yothe r parties . Thus , two o f the mos t commo n approache s fo r preventing pollutio n(produc t reformulatio n o r substituting les s polluting products ) ar e no t availabl e t o thes e facilities . Similarly , thes e facilitie s canno t us e recycling o r reus e a s a wa yo f limiting the amoun t o f thes e liquid s tha t theyhandle . However , the propose d equipmen t an d wor k practic e standard s woul d preven t pollutio nfromtwo o f th e principa l emissio nsource s i n OLD operations . Fo r 

# liP.1 3

1 2 storag e tanks , w e expec t floatin g roof s t o b e use d a s a commo nalternativ e t o add-o ncontro l technologies . Fo r leak s fro mequipmen t suc ha s pump s o r valves , th e require d lea k detectio nand repai r progra mals o woul d preven t pollutio na t th e sourc e withou t th e nee d fo r add-o ncontro l equipment . Th e EP Ai s considerin g whethe r ther e ar e any pollutio npreventio n measure s tha t coul d b e specifie d a s alternative s t o th e contro l approache s i nth e propose d standards . W e ar e specificall yrequestin g comment s fro mth e publi c o nway s tha t additiona l pollutio npreventio nmeasure s coul d b e applie d a t OL D operation s facilities . B . Wha t i s th e sourc e o f authorit yfo r developmen t o f NESHAP ? Sectio n11 2 o f th e CA Arequire s u s t o lis t categorie s an d subcategorie s o f majo r source s and are a source s o f HAP , an d t o establis hNESHA P fo r th e liste d sourc e categorie s an d subcategories . Th e categor yo f majo r source s covere d by today' s propose d NESHA P wa s o nou r initia l lis t o f HA P emissio nsourc e categorie s a s publishe d i nth e Federa l Registe r o nJul y16 , 199 2 (5 7 FR31576 ) . Majo r source s o f HA P ar e thos e tha t hav e th e potentia l t o emi t 1 0 tons/y r o r mor e o f anyon e HA P o r 2 5 tons/y r o r mor e o f anycombinatio n o f HAP . C . Wha t criteri a ar e use d i n th e developmen t o f NESHAP ? 

# I?-P.1 4



### 1 3 Sectio n11 2 o f the CA Arequire s tha t w e establis h NESHAP fo r the contro l o f HA P fro m bot hnewan

d existing majo r sources . The CA Arequire s the NESHAP t o reflec t th e maximu mdegre e o f reductio ni nemission s o f HAP tha t i s achievable . Thi s leve l o f contro l i s commonl yreferre d t o a s the maximu

m achievabl e contro l technolog y(MACT) . Th e MAC T floo r i s the minimu mcontro l leve l allowe d fo r NESHAP an

d i s define d unde r section 112(d)(3 ) o f the CAA . I nessence , the MAC T floo r ensure s tha t the standard i s se t a t a leve l tha t assure s tha t al l majo r source s achiev e th e leve l o f contro l a t leas t a s stringen t a s tha t alread y achieve d b

ythe better-controlle d an d lower-emitting source s i neac hsourc e categoryo r subcategory . Fo r newsources , th e MAC T floo r canno t be les s stringen t than the emissio n contro l tha t i s achieve d i n practic e b ythe best-controlle d simila r source . The MAC T standard s fo r existing source s can b e les s stringen t thanstandard s fo r newsources , bu t they canno t b e les s stringen t than the averag e emissio n limitatio n achieve d b ythe best-performing 1 2 percen t o f existing source s i n the categor yo r subcategory(o r th e best-performing 5 source s fo r categorie s o r subcategorie s wit hfewe r than3 0 sources) . I n developing MACT , we als o conside r contro l option s tha t ar e mor e stringen t thanthe floor . W e mayestablis h 

# 131 4

standard s mor e stringen t tha n th e floo r base d o n consideratio no f th e cos t o f achievin g th e emission s reductions , anynonai r qualit yhealt hand environmenta l impacts , an d energ yrequirements . D . Wha t ar e th e potentia l healt heffect s associate d wit h HA P emitte d fro m

OL D operations ? Th e typ e o f advers e healt heffect s associate d wit hHA P emitte d bythi s sourc e categor yca nrang e fro mmil d t o severe . Th e exten t and degre e t o whic hhealt heffect s ma y b e experience d i s dependen t upon : (1 ) th e ambien t concentration s observe d i n th e area ; (2 ) duratio nan d frequenc yo f exposures ; and (3 ) characteristic s o f expose d individual s (e.g. , genetics , age , preexistin g healt h conditions , an d lifestyle ) whic hvar ygreatl ywithi nth e population . Som e o f thes e factor s ar e als o influence d by source-specifi c characteristic s (e.g. , emissio nrates , releas e heights , and loca l weathe r conditions ) a s wel l a s pollutant-specifi c characteristic s suc ha s toxicity . Th e followin g i s a summar yo f th e potentia l healt heffect s associate d wit hexposur e t o som e o f th e primar yHA P emitte d fro mOL D operations . Benzene . Acut e (short-term ) inhalatio nexposur e o f human s t o benzen e ma ycaus e drowsiness , dizziness , an d headaches , a s wel l a s eye , skin , and respirator ytrac t 

# HP.1 6



### 1 5 irritation , and , a t hig hlevels , unconsciousness . Chroni c (long-term ) inhalatio nexposur e ha s cause d variou s disorder s i nthe blood , including reduce d number s o f red bloo d cell s an d aplasti c anemia , i noccupationa l settings. . Reproductiv e effect s have bee n reporte d fo r wome n expose d b yinhalatio n t o highlevels , an

d advers e effect s onthe developing fetu s hav e bee n observe d i n anima l tests . Increase d incidenc e o f leukemi a (cance r o f the tissue s tha t for mwhit e bloo d cells ) ha s bee n observe d i n human s occupationall yexpose d t o benzene . The EP

Aha s classifie d benzen e a s a Grou p A , know

n huma n carcinogen . Ethylbenzene . Acut e exposur e t o ethylbenzen e i nhuman s result s i nrespiratoryeffect s sucha s throa t irritatio n an d ches t constriction , irritatio n o f the eyes , an d neurologica l effect s sucha s dizziness . Chroni c exposur e t o ethylbenzen e b yinhalatio n i n human s ha s show nconflicting result s regarding it s effect s onthe blood . Anima l studie s hav e reporte d effect s on the blood , liver , an d kidney s from chroni c inhalatio n exposures . No informatio ni s availabl e o nth e developmenta l o r reproductive effect s o f ethylbenzen e i nhumans , bu t .anima l studie s have reporte d developmenta l effects , including birt hdefect s i n animal s expose d vi a inhalation . The EP Aha s classifie d ethylbenzen e i nGrou p D , no t classifiabl e a s t o humancarcinogenicity . 

# A "P.1 7

1 6 Toluene . Human s expose d t o toluen e fo r shor t period s ma yexperienc e irregula r heartbea t and effect s o nth e centra l nervou s syste m(CNS ) suc ha s fatigue , sleepiness , headaches , and nausea . Repeate d exposur e t o hig h concentration s ma yinduc e los s o f coordination , tremors , decrease d brai nsize , and involuntar yey e movements , an d ma y impai r speech , hearing , and vision . Chroni c exposur e t o toluen e i nhuman s ha s als o bee n indicate d t o irritat e th e skin , eyes , an d respirator ytract , and t o caus e dizziness , headaches , an d difficult ywit hsleep . Childre nexpose d t o toluen e befor e birt hma ysuffe r CN S dysfunction , attentio n deficits , an d mino r fac e and lim bdefects . Inhalatio no f toluen e bypregnan t wome nma yincreas e th e ris k o f spontaneou s abortion . Th e EP Aha s develope d a referenc e concentratio no f 0. 4 milligram s pe r cubi c meter s (mg/m-^ ) fo r toluene . Inhalatio n o f thi s concentratio no r les s ove r a lifetim e woul d b e unlikel yt o resul t i nadvers e noncance r effects . N o dat a exis t tha t sugges t toluen e i s carcinogenic . Th e EP Aha s classifie d toluen e i nGrou p D , no t classifiabl e a s t o huma ncarcinogenicity . Viny l chloride . Acut e exposur e t o hig hlevel s o f viny l chlorid e i nai r ha s resulte d i n CN S effect s suc ha s dizziness , drowsiness , and headache s i nhumans . Chroni c exposur e t o viny l chlorid e throug hinhalatio nan d ora l 

# / £P.1 8



### 1 7 exposur e i n human s ha s resulte d i n live r damage . Humanan d anima l studie s showadvers e effect s whic hrais e a concer n abou t potentia l reproductive an d developmenta l hazard s t o human s fro

mexposur e t o viny l chloride . Cance r i s a majo r concer n fro

mexposur e t o viny l chlorid e vi a inhalation , a s viny l chlorid e exposur e ha s bee nshow n t o increas e th e ris k o f a rar e for

mo f live r cance r i nhumans . Th e EPAha s classifie d viny l chlorid e a s a Grou p A , know

nhuman carcinogen . Xylenes . Short-ter minhalatio no f mixe d xylene s ( a mixtur e o f thre e closel yrelate d compounds ) i nhuman s may caus e irritatio n o f the nos e an d throat , nausea , vomiting , gastri c irritation , mil d transien t eye irritation , an d neurologica l effects . Long-ter minhalatio no f xylene s i n human s mayresul t i n CN S effect s suchas•headaches , dizziness , fatigue , tremors , an d incoordination . Othe r reported.effect s includ e labore d breathing , hear t palpitation , sever e ches t pain , abnorma l electrocardiograms , an d possibl e effect s on the bloo d an d kidneys . Developmenta l effect s have bee n indicate d fro mxylen e exposur e vi a inhalatio n i n animals . No t enoughinformatio n exist s t o determin e the carcinogeni c potentia l o f mixe d xylenes . The EP

Aha s classifie d xylene s i n Grou p D , no t classifiabl e a s t o human carcinogenicity . 

# nP.1 9



### 1 8 Implementatio n o f the OL D NESHAP woul d reduc e nationwid e organi c HA P emission s significantl yfrom curren t levels . Thus , the propose d standard s have the potentia l fo r providing bot hcance r an d noncance r relate d healt hbenefits . B yrequiring facilitie s t o reduc e organi c HAP emitte d fro mOL D operations , the propose d standard s woul d als o reduc e emission s o f volatil e organi c compound s (VOC) . Man y VO C reac t photochemicall ywit hnitroge noxide s i n th e atmospher e t o for

mtropospheri c (low-level ) ozone . Anumbe r o f factor s affec t the degre e t o whic hVO C emissio n reduction s wil l reduc e ambien t ozon e concentrations . Human laborator

yan d communit ystudie s hav e shown.tha t exposur e t o ozone level s tha t excee d the nationa l ambien t ai r qualit ystandard s (NAAQS ) canresul t i n variou s advers e healt himpact s sucha s alteration s i nlun g capacit yan

d aggravatio n o f existing respiratorydisease . Anima l studie s hav e show

n increased susceptibilit yt o respiratoryinfectio n an d lung structur e changes . The VO C emission s reduction s resulting fro

m thes e propose d NESHAP wil l reduc e low-leve l ozon e an

d have a positive impac t toward minimizing thes e healt heffects . Among the welfar e impact s fro mexposur e t o ai r tha t exceed s the ozone NAAQ S ar e damag e t o some type s o f commercia l timbe r an d economi c losse s fo r commerciall y



# 16

### 1 9

valuabl e crop s sucha s soybean s an d cotton . Studie s hav e show n tha t exposur e t o excessive ozon e candisrup t carbohydrat e productio n an d distributio ni nplants . Thi s can lead i n turnt o reduce d roo t growth , reduce d biomas s o r yield , reduce d plan t vigo r (whic hcancaus e increase d susceptibilit yt o attac k fro m insect s an

d diseas e an

d damag e fromcold) , an

d diminishe d abilit yt o successfull ycompet e wit hmor e toleran t species . I naddition , excessiv e ozon e level s maydisrup t the structur e an d functio no f forested ' ecosystems . II . Summar

y o f th e Propose

dRul e A . Wha t sourc e categor ywoul d be affecte d b ythe propose d NESHAP ? Th e propose d NESHAP woul d affec t organi c liquid s distributio nactivitie s which , take n together , ar e considere d t o be a facility , o r OL D operations . Th e regulate d liquid s consis t o f organi c liquid s tha t contai n5 percen t b

yweigh t o r mor e o f the organi c HAP compound s i n Tabl e 1 o f the propose d subpar t EEEE , an d al l crud e oi l excep t blac k oil . The activitie s i nthi s categoryoccu r eithe r a t individua l distributio nfacilitie s o r on manufacturing plan t site s tha t consume o r produc e the organi c liquid s regulate d b ythe propose d standards . Onl y thos e OL D operation s a t majo r sourc e facilitie s o r plan t 

# /< ?P.2 1

2 0 site s woul d b e regulated . B . Wha t ar e th e primar ysource s o f emission s an d wha t ar e th e emissions ? Th e emissio no f organi c HA P vapor s result s fro mstorin g an d transferrin g HAP-containin g liquids . Fixed-roo f tank s underg o losse s du e t o atmospheri c change s and change s i n th e liqui d leve l i nth e tank . Floatin g roo f tank s experienc e standin g storag e and liqui d withdrawa l losse s an d als o losse s fro m

fitting s o n th e floatin g deck . A s organi c liquid s ar e loade d int o carg o tank s (tank truck s and railcars ) a t transfe r racks , vapor s ar e emitte d t o th e atmospher e a s th e risin g liqui d displace s vapor s forme d abov e th e liquid . T o contro l thes e vapo r emissions , th e parke d carg o tan k ma yb e connecte d t o a close d ven t vapo r collectio nsyste mand contro l device . Eve ni nthes e controlle d transfe r systems , vapor s ma ylea k t o th e atmospher e fro m

hatc hcovers, relie f valves , o r othe r part s o f th e system . Th e equipmen t component s use d t o conve yorgani c liquid s betwee ntank s o r pipeline s ca n als o b e a sourc e o f vapo r leakage . A t OL D operations , th e equipmen t o f concer nar e pumps , valves , and samplin g connectio nsystems . Th e volatil e constituent s o f organi c liquids , man yo f whic har e HAP , escap e i nth e vapor s emitte d fro mthes e



# riOP.2 2



### 2 1 sources . Our 199 8 surveyo f the OL D industryindicate s tha t essentiall yal l o f the organi c HA P liste d i nthe CA

Aar e presen t i nthe liquid s distribute d i nthes e operations . Base d on tha t surveyan d othe r information , we have estimate d the tota l curren t HAP emission s fromOL D operation s t o b e 70,20 0 Mg/yr (77,30 0 tons/yr) . C . Wha t woul d b e the affecte d source ? Th e affecte d sourc e woul d b e the combinatio no f al l regulate d OL D activitie s an d equipmen t a t a singl e OL D operation . Th e following regulate d activitie s ar e typicall y performe d withi n OLD operation s an d ar e par t o f the affecte d source :

• Transfe r o f organi c liquid s into , an d storag e in , fixed-roo f o r floatin g roo f storag e tanks ;

• Transfe r o f organi c liquid s int o carg o tank s (tan k truck s o r railcars ) a t transfe r racks ; an d

• Transfe r o f organi c liquid s throughpumps , piping , valves , an

d othe r equipmen t tha t maypotentiall y leak . Onl ythos e OL D operation s facilitie s wit ha norgani c liquid s throughpu t greate r than27. 6 millio nliter s (7.2 9 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r (either int o o r ou t o f the facility ) woul d b e subjec t t o the propose d standards . Also , onl ythos e transfe r rac k loadin g position s wit ha n organi c



## « ^ l

### 2 2

liquid s throughpu t o f 11. 8 millio nliter s (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r greate r woul d be require d t o instal l the specifie d emissio n control s onthos e activities . D . Wha t woul d b e the emissio n limits , operating limits , an d othe r standards ? Th e propose d NESHAP have variou s format s fo r th e differen t activitie s an d equipmen t being regulated . Fo r affecte d storag e tanks , you woul d have two option s fo r control . First , you coul d instal l a close d ven t systeman d contro l devic e wit ha t leas t a 9 5 percen t contro l efficienc y fo r organi c HAP o r tota l organi c compound s (TOC) . A s an option , combustio ndevice s maymee t a n exhaus t concentratio n limi t o f 2 0 part s pe r millio n b yvolume (ppmv ) o f organi c HAP o r TOC . A

n operating paramete r o f the contro l devic e woul d have t o b e continuousl ymonitore d an d be maintaine d withi n the establishe d operating limits . Second , yo u coul d mee t a wor k practic e standard b yinstalling a properl y constructe d floating roo f i n the affecte d tank . Th e tank siz e an d vapo r pressur e cutoff s defining affecte d tank s woul d be differen t fo r existing an d newtanks . Fo r affecte d organi c liquid s transfe r racks , yo u woul d hav e t o instal l a vapo r collectio n systeman d a contro l devic e tha t achieve s 9 5 percen t contro l efficiencyo r 2 0 ppm vexhaus t concentratio nfo r combustio ndevices , an d yo u



### ;DO> -

### 2 3

woul d have t o continuousl ymonito r the device . Awor k practic e standard woul d appl yt o carg o tank s loading a t thes e controlle d racks . Eachtan k equippe d wit hvapo r collectio nequipmen t woul d have t o b e teste d annuall yfo r vapo r tightnes s using EP AMetho d 27 . Carg o tank s no t equippe d wit hvapo r collectio nequipmen t woul d have t o b e teste d using the Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) standard tes t procedure s a t DOT' s require d frequency . Fo r carg o tank s tha t yo u d o no t own , yo u woul d have t o ensur e tha t eac htank loading a t affecte d loading position s i s certifie d fo r vapo r tightness . Thes e propose d standard s woul d b e the same fo r existing o r newtransfe r racks . Awor k practic e standard als o woul d als o appl yt o equipmen t (pumps , valves , an d sampling connectio nsystems ) tha t is

- i n organi c liquid s servic e fo r a t leas t 30 0 hour s pe r year . Thi s for mo f contro l involve s regula r instrumen t monitoring fo r leaks , an d repai r o f leaking equipment . Owner s an

d operator s woul d have the optio n o f applying the provision s o f eithe r subpar t T T o r U Uo f 4 0 CFRpar t 63 . Thi s leak detectio n an d repai r (LDAR ) standard i s being propose d fo r bot hexisting an d newequipment . E . Wha t woul d be the testing an d initia l complianc e requirements ? Affecte d OLD operation s woul d need t o determin e whic h 

# _^ i2 4

o f thei r distribute d liquid s qualif ya s a norgani c liqui d a s define d i nth e propose d standards . Th e specifie d tes t metho d fo r thi s i s EP AMetho d 1 8 i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A , an d yo u woul d hav e th e optio no f suggestin g alternativ e approache s fo r th e Administrator' s approval . Contro l device s use d fo r storag e tank s o r transfe r rack s woul d b e subjec t t o performanc e testin g usin g EP A Metho d 18 , 25 , o r 25 Ao f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , o r Metho d 31 6 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , appendi xA , dependin g o nth e constituent s o f th e ga s strea mbein g controlle d an d th e forma t o f th e standar d (organi c HA P o r TOC ) th e facilit y select s fo r it s complianc e demonstration . Floatin g roo f tank s woul d b e subjec t t o visua l and sea l ga p inspection s t o determin e initia l complianc e wit hth e tan k wor k practic e standards . Th e EP AMetho d 2 1 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , i s specifie d fo r th e equipmen t LDARprogram . Al l carg o tank s equippe d wit hvapo r collectio n equipmen t tha t ar e use d t o distribut e organi c liquid s fro m affecte d transfe r rac k loadin g position s woul d hav e t o b e teste d annuall yfo r vapo r tightnes s usin g EP AMetho d 2 7 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA . Fo r carg o tank s tha t ar e no t s o equipped , th e curren t approve d DO T method s woul d continu e t o b e used . Initia l complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimit s fo r storag e



# 2H

### 2 5

tank s an

d transfe r rack s woul d consis t o f demonstrating tha t the contro l devic e achieve s 9 5 percen t contro l efficienc y fo r organi c HAP o r TOC , o r 2 0 ppm vexhaus t concentratio nfo r combustio n devices . Not e tha t al l organi c HAP ar e considere d i n thi s emissio nlimit , no t jus t the HAP liste d i nTabl e 1 o f thi s propose d subpart . During th e same initia l performanc e tes t (o r during a design evaluatio no f the device) , yo u woul d establis hthe referenc e valu e o r rang e fo r the appropriat e operating paramete r o f the contro l device . Wor k practic e standard s ar e being propose d fo r storag e tanks , transfe r racks , an d equipment . Fo r floating roo f storag e tanks , yo u woul d have t o visuall yinspec t eac h interna l floating roo f tan k befor e the initia l filling . Fo r externa l floating roo f tanks , yo u mus t perform a sea l gap inspectio n o f the primar yan d secondar

ydec k seal s withi n 9 0 day s afte r filling . Fo r affecte d transfe r rac k loading positions , yo u woul d hav e t o maintai ndocumentatio n showing tha t carg o tank s tha t wil l load a t thos e position s ar e certifie d a s vapor-tight . I f yo u implemen t a

nLDA Rprogra

mfo r your OL D equipment , yo u woul d have t o provid e u s wit hwritte n specification s o f the progra m a s par t o f your initia l complianc e demonstration .

_____ !

### 2 6

F . Wha t woul d b e the continuou s complianc e provisions ? T o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit hthe emissio n limitatio nfo r contro l device s controlling storag e tank s o r transfe r racks , yo u woul d have t o continuousl ymonito r th e appropriat e operating paramete r an d kee p a record o f th e monitoring data . Complianc e woul d b e demonstrate d b y maintaining the paramete r valu e withi nthe limit s establishe d during the initia l complianc e demonstration . Ther e ar e differen t propose d mean s o f demonstrating continuou s complianc e wit hthe work practic e standards , depending on the emissio nsource . Fo r floating roo f storag e tanks , yo u woul d have t o visuall yinspec t the tank s o na periodi c basi s an

d kee p record s o f the inspections . Fo r externa l floating roo f tanks , sea l ga p measurement s mus t b e performe d onthe secondarysea l onc e pe r yea r an d onth e primarysea l ever

y5 years . An

ycondition s causing inspectio nfailure s woul d nee d t o be repaire d an d record s o f the repair s kept . Th e owne r o r operato r woul d need t o performvapo r tightnes s testing on carg o tank s an d keep vapo r tightnes s record s o f al l carg o tank s loading a t regulate d rac k loading positions , an

d als o woul d have t o tak e step s t o ensur e tha t onl ycarg o tank s wit hvapo r tightnes s certificatio n ar e loade d a t thes e positions . Example s o f thes e step s ar e

<^G?

### 2 7

o 

### contacting carg o tan k owner s t o explai n the vapo r tightnes s requirement s an

d posting reminde r sign s summarizing th e requirement s a t the affecte d loading positions . G . Wha t woul d b e the notification , recordkeeping , an d reporting requirements ? The propose d OL D NESHAP woul d requir e yo u t o keep record s an

d fil e report s consisten t wit hthe notification , recordkeeping , an

d reporting requirement s o f the Genera l Provision s o f 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t A . Tw o basi c type s o f report s woul d b e required : initia l notificatio n an d semiannua l complianc e reports . The initia l notificatio n repor t woul d appris e the regulatoryauthorit yo f applicabilit yfo r existing source s o r o f constructio n fo r newsources . Th e initia l complianc e repor t woul d demonstrat e tha t complianc e had bee n achieved . Thi s repor t woul d contai n the result s o f the initia l performanc e test , whic hinclud e th e determinatio n o f the referenc e operating paramete r valu e o r rang e an

d a lis t o f the organi c liquid s an d equipmen t subjec t t o the standards . Subsequen t complianc e report s woul d describ e an

ydeviation s o f monitore d parameter s from referenc e values ; failure s t o compl ywit hthe startup , shutdown , an

d malfunctio n plan(SSMP ) fo r contro l devices ; an d result s o f LDA

Rmonitoring an

d storag e tank inspections .



# -2 7

### 2 8

Thes e report s ar e als o used t o notif ythe regulatory authorit yo f an

ychange s i n the organi c liquid s handle d o r change s i n the OLD equipmen t o r operations . Record s require d unde r the propose d standard s woul d hav e t o b e kep t fo r 5 years , wit ha t leas t 2 o f thes e year s being on the facilitypremises . Thes e record s woul d includ e copie s o f al l report s tha t you have submitted ; anup-to-dat e record o f your organi c liquid s an d affecte d equipment ; an d a listing o f al l carg o tank s tha t transfe r organi c liquid s a t affecte d rac k loading positions , including thei r vapo r tightnes s certification . Monitoring dat a fromcontro l device s woul d have tobe kep t t o ensur e tha t operating limit s ar e being maintained . Record s fro m the LDA

Rprograman

d storag e vesse l inspections , an d record s o f startups , shutdowns , an

d malfunction s o f eachcontro l devic e ar e neede d t o ensur e tha t the control s i nplac e ar e continuing t o b e effective . Ill . Rational e for Selectin gth e ProposedStandard s A . Howdi d we selec t the sourc e category ? Organi c liquid s distributio noperation s wer e include d
a s a sourc e categoryonour initia l lis t o f HAP sourc e categories . Sinc e liqui d distributio n i s ofte n carrie d ou t a t SOCMI , refinery , o r othe r manufacturing plan t sites , ther e i s the potentia l for overlapping contro l requirement s



## Pf ?P.3 0

2 9 i nthos e case s wher e OL D activitie s ar e alread yregulate d by othe r NESHAP . T o avoi d th e situatio nwher e a nemissio n sourc e coul d b e subjec t t o multipl e NESHAP , w e ar e definin g th e OL D sourc e categor yt o exclud e emissio nsource s alread y covere d byothe r NESHA P fro mcontro l unde r thes e propose d standards . Th e propose d Organi c Liquid s Distributio n(non

Gasoline ) NESHA P woul d appl yt o organi c liquid s distributio n activitie s a t site s tha t ar e determine d t o b e "majo r sources " a s define d i n sectio n112(a)(1 ) o f th e CAA . Thi s mean s thos e plant s o r facilitie s wher e th e stationar y source s locate d withi na contiguou s are a an d unde r commo n contro l emi t o r hav e th e potentia l t o emit , considerin g controls , a tota l o f 1 0 tp yo r mor e o f anysingl e HA P o r 2 5 tp yo r mor e o f anycombinatio n o f HAP . Unde r th e EPA' s 199 5 Potentia l t o Emi t Transitio n Policy , Stat e and loca l ai r regulator s hav e th e optio no f treatin g th e followin g type s o f source s a s nonmajo r unde r sectio n11 2 and permi t program s unde r titl e V o f th e CAA : (1 ) source s tha t maintai n adequat e record s t o demonstrat e tha t thei r actua l emission s ar e les s tha n5 0 percen t o f th e applicabl e majo r sourc e threshol d an d hav e continue d t o operat e a t les s tha n 5 0 percen t o f th e threshol d sinc e Januar y1994 ; and (2 ) source s wit hactua l emission s betwee n

^P.3 1

3 0 5 0 an d 10 0 percen t o f th e threshold , bu t whic hhol d State

enforceabl e limit s tha t ar e enforceabl e a s a practica l matter . Durin g th e EPA' s rulemakin g relate d t o th e potentia l t o emi t (PTE ) requirement s i nth e Genera l Provision s (4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t A ) an d th e titl e V operatin g permit s program , w e hav e issue d thre e extension s t o th e origina l transitio npolicy , th e lates t memorandu m date d Decembe r 20 , 199 9 and entitled , "Thir d Extensio no f Januar y25 , 199 5 Potentia l t o Emi t Transitio nPolicy. " Source s tha t compl ywit heithe r o f th e tw o criteri a liste d abov e wil l no t b e considere d a majo r sourc e unde r th e OL D NESHAP . However , source s wil l b e require d t o compl ywit h th e applicabl e provision s o f th e fina l PT E rul e a s o f th e effectiv e dat e o f tha t rule . Organi c liquid s distributio n operation s tha t d o no t
mee t th e criteri a fo r a majo r sourc e unde r th e PT E transitio npolic yar e no t bein g regulate d a t thi s time . W e ma yconside r are a source s fo r regulatio na t a futur e dat e a s par t o f th e are a sourc e strateg yauthorize d unde r sectio n 112(k ) o f th e CAA . Th e sourc e categor ycovere d byth e propose d standard s i s no t a singl e establishe d "industry " i nth e usua l sense , bu t involve s a numbe r o f traditiona l industr ysegments . Th e purpos e o f th e propose d standard s i s t o enac t control s o n 

# So

### 3 1

majo r sourc e OL D operation s whereve r theyoccur , an d thi s include s a variet yo f traditiona l industries . Whil e thes e industrysegment s ar e distinc t fro mone anothe r (for example , theyar e describe d b ysevera l differen t SIC/NAIC S codes) , theyar e relate d t o eachothe r becaus e theyhandl e simila r type s o f liquid s whic har e input s o r output s o f th e othe r segments . A s an example , a particula r organi c liquid s produce d b

ya chemica l manufacturing facilit ymayb e handle d b ya for-hir e storag e terminal , an d the nente r anothe r manufacturing plan t t o be used i n the making o f a product . W e believe the OL D sourc e categoryi s bes t explaine d througha descriptio no f the organi c liquid s an d distributio n activitie s tha t ar e affected , an d the type s o f facilitie s wher e the OL D activitie s occur . Th e organi c liquid s affecte d b ythe propose d standard s ar e thos e liquid s tha t contai n 5 percen t b yweigh t o r mor e o f th e 6 9 organi c HA P listed i nTabl e 1 o f the propose d subpart . Thes e liquid s includ e pur e HAP chemical s (straigh t toluene , fo r example) , petroleu m liquids , an

d man yblende d mixture s an

d solution s o f organi c HAP chemical s tha t ar e store d an

d transporte d i nbul k throughou t the economy . Th e propose d rul e woul d als o affec t al l crud e oil , wit hth e exceptio n o f blac k oil , tha t ha s undergon e custod ytransfe r ou t o f productio n facilities , eve n thoug hindividua l crude s 

# 31P.3 3



### 3 2
mayhave a tota l HAP conten t eithe r above o r below5 percen t b yweight . Not e tha t gasolin e (includin g aviatio n gasoline ) distributio n i s exclude d fro mthe propose d OL D NESHAP becaus e thes e operation s ar e alread ycovere d b

ythe Gasolin e Distributio n NESHAP , 4 0 CFR par t 63 , subpar t R . The OL D activitie s an d equipmen t tha t woul d b e subjec t t o the propose d contro l requirement s are : (a ) storag e o f organi c liquid s i n stationar ystorag e tanks ; (b ) organi c liquid s transfe r int o carg o tank s (tan k truck s o r railcars ) a t transfe r racks ; an d (c ) the equipmen t component s use d i n organi c liquid s transfe r activitie s (pumps , valves , an d sampling connectio n systems) . Not e tha t distributio nunde r th e propose d standard s consist s o f thos e activitie s involve d i n storing organi c liquid s an d transferring themeithe r ont o o r of f a majo r sourc e plan t site . Organi c liquid s distributio ni s carrie d ou t a t thre e primarycategorie s o f operations . Firs t i s the stand-alon e bul k terminal , whic htypicall yreceives , stores , an d send s ou t liquid s owne d b yothe r companie s ("for-hire " facilities) . Thes e facilitie s ar e no t collocate d wit ha manufacturing sit e an d wil l be affecte d i f theymee t th e majo r sourc e criteri a base d on thei r OL D activities . Some chemica l companie s ow n stand-alon e terminal s t o distribut e thei r ow

n liquids , an

d theyma

yals o leas e storag e spac e a t 

# 3 2. 3 3

thes e terminal s t o othe r companies . Th e secon d categor y consist s o f OL D operation s tha t ar e contiguou s and unde r commo ncontro l wit ha manufacturin g (e.g. , SOCM I facilit yo r petroleu mrefinery ) plan t site . Th e OL D operation s tha t satisf yth e annua l throughpu t cutof f a t plan t site s tha t constitut e a majo r sourc e o f HA P wil l b e subjec t t o th e propose d standards . Ther e ma yals o b e additiona l type s o f manufacturin g facilitie s tha t hav e affecte d OL D operations . Th e thir d facilit ytyp e i s pipelin e stations , typicall y handling ; crud e oil , tha t hav e breakou t storag e tank s use d t o absor bsurge s i nth e pipelin e flo wo r t o serv e a s distributio npoint s fo r othe r mode s (marin e vessels , etc. ) outsid e o f th e pipeline . Sectio n112(d)(1 ) o f th e CA Arequire s u s t o promulgat e NESHA P fo r "eac hcategor yo r subcategor yo f majo r source s an d are a source s o f hazardou s ai r pollutant s liste d fo r regulatio n. . . " Subcategorizatio no f a sourc e categor yi s sometime s appropriat e fo r NESHA P whe nindustria l segment s withi nth e categor yhav e differen t type s o f processe s o r emissio ncharacteristic s o r requir e th e us e o f differen t type s o f contro l techniques . A s w e develope d th e propose d OL D NESHAP , w e considere d whethe r w e shoul d develo p differen t contro l requirement s fo r th e variou s OL D industr y segments . 

# 3 33 4 Arevie wo f th e OL D dat a bas e and th e informatio n gathere d durin g ou r sit e visit s t o OL D facilitie s showe d that , despit e th e extrem e operatin g condition s tha t occu r i n th e proces s unit s a t SOCM I facilitie s an d refineries , th e liqui d distributio noperation s a t th e variou s type s o f facilitie s ar e carrie d ou t unde r condition s a t o r clos e t o ambient . Furthermore , commo n organi c HA P contro l technologie s (suc ha s therma l oxidizer s an d flares ) ar e applicabl e t o and i n us e fo r th e activitie s performe d a t al l
o f th e facilit ytypes . Thus , base d o nthes e factors , w e conclude d tha t designatio n o f separat e subcategorie s fo r th e purpos e o f developin g differen t emissio nstandard s i nth e OL D NESHA P wa s no t warranted . B . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e propose d pollutant s t o b e regulated ? Th e dat a bas e o f result s fro mou r 199 8 surve yo f OL D operation s indicate s th e presenc e o f abou t 9 3 differen t HA P i nal l o f th e reporte d liquids , whic hi s mos t o f th e organi c compound s o r group s o f compound s liste d a s HA P unde r sectio n 112(b ) o f th e CAA . Th e variet yo f HA P i s s o larg e becaus e th e OL D industr yrepresent s th e sumtota l o f th e chemica l
an d petroleu mliquid s handle d throughou t industr y(excep t gasoline) . Yet , ther e ma yb e additiona l organi c HA P i n liquid s tha t ar e no t i n th e EPA' s OL D dat a base . 

# 3^

### 3 5 W e considere d whethe r i t woul d be reasonabl e t o selec t al l organi c HAP liste d unde r sectio n112(b ) fo r regulatio n i n th e OL D NESHAP . Some organi c HA P have a verylo

w potentia l t o b e emitte d t o the atmospher e fro mOL D operation s becaus e o f thei r lo wvolatilitie s (vapor pressur e value) . W e do no t conside r i t reasonabl e fo r facilitie s tha t mayhave a significan t par t o f thei r OL D operation s dedicate d t o handling low-volatilit yHA P liquid s t o appl y control s representing MAC T t o thos e activities . A s a result , we decide d i t woul d b e appropriat e t o develo p a lis t o f the specifi c organi c HAP t o b e regulate d b yth e propose d standards . W e firs t mad e a listing o f al l o f th e HAP believe d t o exis t i nOL D operations , ranke d i n orde r o f decreasing vapo r pressur e (a t 2 5 degree s C) . W e the n selecte d a vapo r pressur e cutof f o f 0. 1 pound pe r squar e inchabsolut e (psia ) (about 0. 7 kilopascal ) t o exclud e the compound s wit hthe lowes t volatilitie s from the bottomo f the table . Thi s cutof f poin t wa s selecte d an d wa s agree d t o b

yindustr

yreviewer s a s a reasonabl e leve l belo w whic hthe emissio npotentia l woul d be minimal . Th e 0. 7 kilopasca l vapo r pressur e cutof f i s recommende d b ythe fac t tha t the HO

N(i n Tabl e 6 o f 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , appendi xt o subpar t G ) require s the applicatio n o f control s fo r new storag e vessel s wit ha capacit yo f 15 1 cubi c meter s o r



# SS "3 6

greate r an d storin g liquid s wit ha vapo r pressur e o f 0. 7 kilopasca l o r greater . Th e propose d applicabilit ycutoff s fo r OL D storag e tank s ar e simila r t o th e cutoff s i nth e HO N (fo r example , ne wOL D tank s large r tha n15 1 cubi c meter s storin g anyliqui d wit ha vapo r pressur e greate r tha n0. 7 kilopasca l woul d b e covered) . I f w e choos e a cutof f highe r tha n0. 7 kilopascal , whic hwoul d leav e eve nfewe r HA P subjec t t o control , ther e woul d b e a ninconsistenc ybetwee n th e HA P tabl e and th e propose d storag e tan k applicabilit y cutoffs . Therefore , o nth e basi s o f thes e considerations , w e use d a cutof f o f 0. 7 kilopasca l t o deriv e th e specifi c organi c HA P liste d i n Tabl e 1 o f th e propose d standards . Th e propose d standard s woul d affec t OL D activitie s involvin g tw o categorie s o f organi c liquids : (1 ) thos e liquid s containin g a t leas t 5 percen t byweigh t o f th e HA P liste d i nTabl e 1 o f th e propose d subpart ; an d (2 ) al l crud e oil s excep t blac k oil . A s wit hth e 0. 7 kilopasca l cutof f
use d t o determin e whic hHA P woul d b e i nTabl e 1 , th e inten t
o f th e 5 percen t HA P cutof f i s t o exclud e th e lowes t emittin g organi c liquid s fro mth e contro l requirements . Th e 5 percen t HA P cutof f als o ha s preceden t i nexistin g par t 6 3 subparts . I nth e HON , 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t H an d th e NESHA P fo r Polycarbonat e Productio n(4 0 CF R63.1103(d) , subpar t YY) , th e equipmen t lea k provision s affec t onl y



# 33b

### 3 7

equipmen t containing o r contacting a flui d tha t i s a t leas t

^5 percen t b

yweigh t o f tota l organi c HAP , on a n annua l average.basis . Our analysi s o f 1 7 differen t crud e oi l profile s indicate d a

n averag e HAP weigh t percentag e i nthe emitte d vapor s o f abou t 6. 0 percent . However , abou t hal f o f thes e sample s had a HAP percentag e below5 percent . Unde r th e 5 percen t HAP cutof f defining a regulate d organi c liquid , thi s woul d exemp t fro

m contro l a larg e amoun t o f the crud e oi l a s i t enter s an

d leave s distributio nfacilities . Despit e it s relativel ylo wHA P content , crud e oi l had a significan t vapo r pressur e tha t wa s a s higha s 8 psi a an d average d abou t 3. 5 psi a fo r al l o f the profil e dat a we examined . Also , crud e oi l i s estimate d t o mak e u p approximatel y6 8 percen t o f the volume o f organi c liquid s i n the distributio n system , an d 8 4 percen t o f the volume fo r liquid s wit ha HAP conten t below1 0 percent . Sinc e th e potentia l emission s fro mcrud e oi l ar e a significan t fractio n o f the tota l OL D emissions , we believ e tha t the potentia l reduction s fro mcontrolling crud e oi l woul d b e significan t an

d ar e a compelling reaso nt o regulat e al l distribute d crud e oi l excep t fo r the specifi c variet y discusse d below . Blac k oi l i s a for

mo f crud e oi l tha t we determine d i n



# ?>7P.3 9



### 3 8 th e fina l NESHAP fo r Oi l an d Ga s Production , 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t HH , t o have a ver ylo wpotentia l t o produc e flas h emission s fro

m storag e tanks . Furthermore , tank s containing blac k oi l ar e no t considere d t o be affecte d source s unde r subpar t HH . W e ar e including a simila r exemptio n fo r blac k oi l i n the OL D NESHAP becaus e we d o no t conside r storag e o r transfe r o f blac k oi l t o constitut e a significan t emissio n source . The definitio n o f blac k oi l i s being altere d from tha t use d i n subpar t HH . I n subpar t H H i t i s the "initia l producing " gas-to-oi l rati o an d AP I (America

nPetroleu

m Institute ) gravit ytha t ar e use d t o defin e some crud e oil s a s blac k oil . Fo r thi s propose d subpart , we ar e using th e gas-to-oi l rati o an d AP I gravit yo f the crud e oi l a t th e poin t o f entryt o the distributio n systemt o defin e the crud e oi l a s blac k oil . C . Howdi d we selec t the propose d affecte d source ? Th e affecte d sourc e woul d b e the combinatio no f al l regulate d emissio nsource s a t anOL D operation s facility . Th e regulate d emissio nsource s a t an OLD operation s facilit y are :

• Storag e tanks ;

• Transfe r racks ; an d

• Equipmen t i norgani c liquid s service . W e hav e chose n a broad sourc e definitio nwhic hallow s a storag e tank , transfe r rack , o r singl e piec e o f equipmen t t o 

# 3

_P.4 0

3 9 b e replace d o r upgrade d withou t it s replacemen t bein g designate d a s a ne wsource . Th e broa d sourc e definitio nwa s chose nfo r thi s sourc e categor ybecaus e a mor e narro wsourc e definitio nwoul d mea n tha t a chang e t o a nindividua l regulate d emissio nsourc e a t a facilit ycoul d caus e tha t individua l emissio nsourc e t o b e designate d a s new . Th e designatio na s ne wwoul d mea ntha t th e individua l emissio n sourc e (suc ha s a singl e storag e tank ) woul d b e require d t o observ e th e emissio n o r operatin g limit s i nth e propose d subpar t fo r ne wsources . I t als o mean s tha t th e emissio n sourc e woul d nee d t o b e permitte d separately , an d it s recordkeepin g an d reportin g requirement s coul d fal l o n interval s differen t fro mth e res t o f th e facility . We • looke d a t th e emission s reduction s tha t coul d possibl yb e gaine d throug ha narro wdefinitio no f affecte d sourc e an d decide d that , o nbalance , a broa d definitio ni s th e bette r choice . D . Ho wdi d w e determin e th e basi s and leve l o f th e propose d standard s fo r existin g and ne wsources ? 1 . MAC T Floo r Determinatio n W e determine d separat e MAC T floor s fo r eac ho f th e emissio nsource s tha t exis t a t OL D operations . W e receive d dat a throug hquestionnair e response s fro m24 7 facilitie s owne d o r operate d by7 7 companies . Thes e facilitie s reflecte d th e variou s majo r industr ysegment s involve d i n • 

# S fP.4 1



### 4 0 organi c liquid s distribution . However , du e t o the pervasiv e natur e o f distributio n operation s throughou t the economy , w e believ e tha t our surveyonl ycapture d abou t 4 0 percen t o f al l o f the larg e OL D operation s i n the country . Additiona l detaile d informatio n wa s obtaine d fro m sit e visit s t o nin e OL D facilities . The dat a collecte d represen t a complet e rang e o f the larg e facilitie s tha t woul d b e affecte d b ythe propose d standard . Therefore , we believe the dat a ar e representativ e o f OL D operation s throughou t th e country . W e determine d MAC T floor s fo r existing source s base d on the arithmeti c averag e o f the lowest-emitting 1 2 percen t wher e thi s approac hmad e sens e an d produce d a resul t tha t corresponde d t o us e o f a specifi c contro l technology . Fo r the remaining cases , we used the median(middle ) valu e t o represen t the MAC T floor . Fo r storag e tank s an d transfe r racks , floor s wer e determine d fo r eachsubgrou p (siz e an

d vapo r pressur e rang e fo r tanks , vapo r pressur e rang e fo r loading positions) . Fo r the severa l storag e tank subgroup s wit hfewe r than3 0 sources , we used the media n o f the five lowest-emitting tank s (th e third tank) . Using the storag e tan k dat a collecte d from OL D operations , we determine d the relative emission s from1,17 5 reporte d tank s an

d listed thes e tank s fro mlowes t t o highes t emitting withi nsevera l tan k siz e an

d liqui d vapo r pressur e 

# HO

### 4 1

ranges . Fo r transfe r racks , we listed individua l loading position s fro

mlowes t t o highes t emitting , starting wit h thos e wit ha contro l device , followed b ythos e using bottom o r submerge d loading , an d finall ythos e using splas hfil l (considered the baseline , uncontrolle d case) . Fo r equipmen t leaks , the facilitie s wit ha Federa l LDA Rprogramwer e liste d first , followe d b ythos e wit ha Stat e o r loca l program , an

d the n thos e wit hno program . Th e bes t controlle d storag e tank s a t OLD'facilitie s i n ou r dat a bas e us e eithe r a close d ven t system an d contro l devic e o r a well-designe d interna l o r externa l floating roof . Thes e control s represen t the maximu mleve l o f contro l availabl e fo r storag e tanks . The existing sourc e MAC T floo r fo r tank s wa s determine d t o b e a choic e o f contro l devic e o r a floating roo f wit heffective emissio nseals . The specifi c tank size s an

d organi c liquid s t o whic hthe MAC T floo r applie s ar e essentiall ythe sam e a s thos e i nthe HON . Th e bes t controlle d transfe r rack s a t the OL D operation' s facilitie s i nour surveydat a bas e ar e equippe d wit ha vapo r collectio n systeman d contro l devic e t o reduc e organi c HAP emissions . Contro l efficiencie s fo r thes e device s wer e reporte d a s ranging fro mbelow9 0 percen t t o ove r 9 9 percent , bu t no tes t dat a wer e provide d t o suppor t thes e contro l efficiencies . The MAC T floo r fo r existing 

# 4 .P.4 3

4 2 transfe r rack s wa s determine d t o b e th e us e o f a contro l device , withou t identifyin g anyspecifi c contro l efficiencie s tha t constitut e th e floor . However , base d o n th e type s o f device s i nus e and th e liquid s bein g controlled , w e believ e tha t a contro l efficienc yo f 9 5 percen t i s appropriat e fo r thi s floor . Th e bes t controlle d OL D equipmen t i s subjec t t o a n instrument-base d LDARprogram , and w e foun d tha t a nLDAR progra m

simila r t o th e HONprogra mrepresent s th e existin g sourc e MAC T floor . Fo r ne wsources , th e CA Arequire s th e MAC T floo r t o b e base d o nth e degre e o f emission s reduction s achieve d i n practic e b

yth e best-controlle d simila r source . Th e MAC T floo r fo r ne wsource s and existin g source s i s th e sam e i n th e cas e o f transfe r rack s (us e o f a contro l device ) an d equipmen t leak s (a ninstrumen t LDARprogram) . Fo r storag e tanks , th e contro l technologie s i nth e MAC T floor s fo r existin g and ne wsource s ar e als o th e same . However , i nth e ne wsourc e floor , thes e control s ar e applie d t o smalle r tank s and t o les s volatil e liquid s whe nthe yar e store d i n large r tanks . Amor e detaile d summar yo f th e MAC T floo r analysis , includin g th e dat a and th e consideration s use d t o determin e th e MAC T floor s fo r OL D operations , ca nb e foun d i nth e 

# HZ

### 4 3

technica l suppor t documen t locate d i n the docket . 2 . Beyond-the-Floo r Level s o f Contro l Using the MAC T floo r level s a s a starting point , we investigate d whethe r an yapplicabl e contro l approache s wer e availabl e tha t wer e bot hmor e stringen t thanthes e floor s an d satisfie d the criteri a i n section112(d)(2 ) o f the CAA . Th e MAC T floor s fo r existing an d neworgani c liquid s storag e tank s consis t o f a choic e betwee nth e emissio n limitatio ni n the HO N(closed ven t systeman d contro l devic e a t 9 5 percen t efficiency ) an d the floating roo f requirement s i n4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t WW . Thes e control s represen t the maximu m leve l o f contro l availabl e fo r storag e tanks . The tank capacit yan

d liqui d vapo r pressur e cutoff s defining whic htank s woul d b e affecte d ar e the same a s thos e i nth e HON . W e believ e tha t thes e cutoff s defin e al l o f the storag e tank s tha t i t i s reasonabl e t o regulat e wit hMAC T technology . Therefore , we wer e no t abl e t o identif yan y reasonabl e technologie s tha t woul d creat e beyond-the-floo r contro l level s fo r storag e tanks . Th e bes t controlle d organi c liquid s transfe r rack s achiev e emission s reduction s o f 9 5 percen t o r greate r using a close d ven t systeman d contro l device . Due t o the diversit yo f liquid s handle d i nthe industryan d the consequen t us e o f a variet yo f contro l devices , we conclude d 

# *PP.4 5

4 4 tha t level s abov e 9 5 percen t shoul d no t b e considere d a s a n alternativ e contro l leve l fo r transfe r racks . Therefore , n o beyond-the-floo r contro l level s wer e deeme d achievabl e fo r thi s emissio nsource . Th e bes t controlle d OL D equipmen t i s subjec t t o a n instrument-base d LDARprogram , and w e foun d tha t a nLDAR progra msimila r t o th e HO Nprogra mrepresent s bot hth e existin g an d ne wsourc e MAC T floors . W e hav e no t identifie d
anybeyond-the-floo r contro l approache s tha t provid e bette r contro l o f leakag e emission s fro mequipmen t a t a reasonabl e cost . 3 . Selectio no f th e Standard s Som e OL D operation s ma yinvolv e ver ylo worgani c liquid s throughput s becaus e the yoperat e intermittently , bu t the ywoul d stil l stil l b e define d a s a majo r sourc e i f the y ar e o nth e sam e plan t sit e a s a majo r sourc e manufacturin g operation . W e desire d a smal l siz e cutof f t o exemp t OL D operation s wit ha ver ysmal l amoun t o f distributio n activity . Th e surve ydat a di d no t indicat e anyspecifi c organi c liquid s throughpu t int o o r ou t o f a facilit ytha t woul d hel p u s i nidentifyin g a lowe r siz e threshol d fo r th e siz e o f OL D operation s facilit ytha t shoul d b e affecte d by th e propose d standards . Therefore , w e turne d t o existin g Federa l an d Stat e organi c liquid s transfe r rules . Th e 

# HH

### 4 5

cutof f valu e o f 20,00 0 gallon s pe r da yi s frequentl yuse d t o identif yaffecte d transfe r facilities . Thi s valu e convert s t o 27. 6 millio n liter s pe r year , the smalles t siz e facilit y we ar e proposing t o affec t b ythes e standards . Thi s i s a reasonabl e approac ha s facilitie s belowthi s siz e cutof f d o no t have the volume o f organi c liquid s throughpu t tha t woul d yiel d emission s warranting control , a s identifie d b yothe r Federa l an

d Stat e rules . I f the throughput s int o an d ou t o f the facilit yduring a calenda r yea r ar e different , the n th e large r o f the two value s woul d b e use d t o determin e whethe r the operatio ni s affecte d b ythes e propose d standards . The propose d standard s wer e selecte d following th e completio n o f the MAC T floo r an d beyond-the-floo r analyses . Afte r w e determine d tha t ther e wer e n o reasonabl e contro l measure s mor e stringen t than the MAC T floors , we use d th e floor s a s the basi s for the selectio no f the standards . Whil e some o f ou r surveyresponse s appeare d t o indicat e contro l level s beyon d the level s normall yassociate d wit h thes e device s (i.e. , man yreport s a t o r nea r 10 0 percen t efficiency) , we believe d tha t thes e value s di d no t represen t the continuou s performanc e o f the contro l device s i n use . Also , thes e highefficiencyvalue s wer e no t supporte d b y tes t data . Therefore , a contro l efficiencyo f 9 5 percen t i s being propose d fo r contro l device s use d fo r storag e tank s o r 

# HA-P.4 7

4 6 transfe r racks . T o b e consisten t wit hth e result s fro mth e tes t method s allowe d fo r showin g compliance , thi s contro l efficienc yca nb e demonstrate d i n term s o f eithe r tota l organi c HA P o r TOC . I n addition , combustio ndevice s hav e a n optiona l emissio nlimi t o f 2 0 ppmvo f organi c HA P o r TO C i n th e exhaust . Som e transfe r rack s a t OL D facilitie s ar e use d onl yo n a periodi c o r intermitten t basi s and , therefore , hav e relativel ylo wvolum e throughput s and lo wemissions . W e d o no t believ e i t woul d b e reasonabl e t o instal l a contro l syste mo nsuc hlo wusag e racks . However , th e surve ydat a di d no t indicat e anyspecifi c throughpu t leve l belo wwhic h transfe r rac k emissio ncontrol s wer e no t bein g use d i nOL D operations . A s th e surve ydat a coul d no t provid e directio no na throughpu t cutoff , w e searche d existin g Federa l an d Stat e ai r rule s t o evaluat e th e cutoff s i nuse . Th e provision s o f 4 0 CF R63.1101 , subpar t YY(Generi c MAC T Standards) , defin e a lo wthroughpu t transfe r rac k a s a rac k tha t transfer s les s tha n11. 8 millio nliter s (3.1 2 millio ngallons ) pe r yea r o f liqui d containin g regulate d HAP . Thi s cutof f i s equivalen t t o abou t on e tan k truc k ful l o f liqui d pe r day . N o additiona l cutoff s affectin g individua l transfe r rack s wer e identified . Th e cutof f use d i nsubpar t Y Ywa s considere d


# H<b

### 4 7

reasonabl e fo r the OL D transfe r rac k contro l requirement , and , therefore , we ar e proposing t o regulat e onl ythos e transfe r rac k position s tha t load 11. 8 millio nliter s pe r yea r o r mor e o f organi c liquid . Atransfe r rac k mayhave mor e thanon e loading positio n (i.e. , "parking spot" ) fo r carg o tanks . Sinc e eac hloading positio n mayreceive liqui d fro ma specifi c storag e tank independentl yo f the othe r positions , eac hpositio ncan b e considere d a

n individua l emissio n sourc e during the time tha t a carg o tan

k i s i nplac e an

d loading liquid . Therefore , we ar e applying bot hthe emissio n limi t an d throughpu t cutof f t o eachindividua l loading position . Unde r thi s approach , owner s an d operator s wil l hav e maximu m flexibilit yi n determining the optimu mconfiguratio n fo r thei r loading activities . A t controlle d transfe r rack s (thos e equippe d wit ha vapo r collectio n systeman d a contro l device) , fugitiv e emission s ma

yoccur fro

mleaking truc k transpor t tank s o r railcar s throughdome covers , malfunctioning pressur e relie f vents , o r othe r potentia l leak sources . Thus , a requiremen t t o contro l liqui d transfe r operation s using a vapo r collectio n syste

man d contro l devic e coul d b e ineffectiv e i f the carg o tank s leak vapor s t o the atmospher e during the loading process . Fo r carg o tank s equippe d wit hvapo r 

# HiP.4 9

4 8 collectio nequipmen t (whic htypicall yinclude s a nintegrate d vapo r valv e tha t i s opene d t o releas e vapor s t o th e contro l syste m durin g loading) , EP AMetho d 2 7 i n4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , i s specifie d fo r ensurin g th e tank' s vapo r tightness . Tan k truck s use d fo r gasolin e distributio nar e routinel yequippe d fo r vapo r collectio nan d underg o a n annua l Metho d 2 7 tes t unde r th e NESHA P regulatin g gasolin e distribution . However , tan k truck s i norgani c chemica l servic e typicall yar e no t equippe d fo r vapo r collection . Fo r thes e tanks , Metho d 2 7 woul d no t b e applicable . Instead , th e curren t DO T method s whic hrequir e periodi c lea k testin g o f chemica l tan k truck s and railcar s ar e i nplac e an d effectiv e fo r organi c liquid s carg o tanks . E . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e forma t o f th e propose d standards ? Th e forma t selecte d fo r th e propose d standard s wa s develope d afte r a comprehensiv e revie wo f Federa l an d Stat e rule s affectin g th e sam e emissio n source s tha t occu r i n simila r industries . Ou r goa l wa s t o se t a noveral l forma t tha t i s compatibl e wit hth e applicabl e tes t methods , reflect s th e performanc e o f th e MAC T technologies , an d i s consisten t wit hth e format s use d i nothe r NESHA P fo r simila r HA P sources . Th e propose d standard s fo r OL D operation s consis t o f a combinatio no f severa l formats : numerica l emissio nlimit s 

# ItP.5 0



### "4 9 an d operating limits , equipmen t standards , an d wor k practic e standards . Sectio n 112(h ) o f the CA Astate s tha t ".. . i f i t i s no t feasibl e i n the judgmen t o f the Administrato r t o prescrib e o r enforc e a nemissio n standard fo r contro l o f a hazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutants , the Administrato r may , i n lie u thereof , promulgat e a design , equipment , wor k practice , o r operationa l standard , o r combinatio nthereo f

. . . " Sectio n112(h ) furthe r define s the phras e "no t feasibl e t o prescrib e o r enforc e anemissio n standard " a s an ysituatio ni n whic h".. . a hazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutant s canno t b e emitte d througha conveyanc e designe d an d constructe d t o emi t o r captur e suchpollutant , .. . o r th e applicatio no f measuremen t methodologyt o a particula r clas s o f source s i s no t practicabl e ... " Numerica l emissio nlimit s ar e feasibl e fo r storag e tank s an

d transfe r rack s outfitte d wit ha close d ven t system an d a contro l device . Fo r thes e contro l situations , we hav e specifie d a percentag e contro l efficiencyfo r consistenc y wit hthe HO

Nan d the Refiner

yNESHAP , whic htake ntogether , regulat e a grea t numbe r o f the organi c liquid s handle d i n OL D operations . T o allowflexibility , we ar e proposing a 9 5 percen t contro l efficiencylimi t i n term s o f eithe r tota l organi c HA

P o r TOC . Fo r combustio ndevices , we ar e specifying an alternat e emissio n limi t o f 2 0 ppm vo f eithe r 

# HIP.5 1



### 5 0 organi c HAP o r TOC . Depending on the tes t method s chosen , the owne r o r operato r woul d selec t the mos t suitabl e format . The propose d 9 5 percen t an d 2 0 ppm

vlimit s appl yno t t o entir e transfe r rack s bu t t o eachindividua l loading positio n a t the racks . W e fel t tha t unde r thi s format , source s woul d have mor e freedo mi nchoosing howt o organiz e the transfe r o f affecte d organi c liquids . Fo r example , a t a rac k wit htwo loading position s yo u migh t designat e an d configur e on e positio nt o b e a nuncontrolle d position , an d anothe r positio n t o b e a controlle d positio n pipe d througha vapo r collectio nsystemt o a contro l device . Yo u coul d the n load affecte d organi c liquid s onl ya t the controlle d positio n bu t coul d stil l load unregulate d liquid s through the same rac k a t the uncontrolle d position . Equipmen t an

d work practic e standard s affec t eac ho f the emissio n source s being regulated . The following subparagraph s describ e the selectio no f thes e formats . Floating Roo f Standard fo r Storag e Tanks . Yo u hav e the optio n o f installing floating roof s tha t mee t the requirement s o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t WW , i nyour affecte d storag e tanks . The floatin g roo f optio nha s bee n include d i nmos t Federa l rule s affecting storag e tanks . Our goa l wa s t o b e consisten t wit hthes e othe r rule s an d t o provid e yo u wit hflexibilit yi n controlling the storag e tank s tha t 

# 5f>P.5 2

5 1 contai naffecte d organi c liquids . Vapo r Tightnes s Testin g fo r Carg o Tanks . Fo r th e close d ven t (vapo r collection ) syste mo ntransfe r rack s t o b e effectiv e i nconveyin g al l o f th e displace d HA P vapor s t o th e contro l device , th e carg o tank s mus t b e maintaine d i n a wa ytha t minimize s leakage . Ther e i s n o mean s availabl e fo r collectin g o r measurin g thes e leakag e emissions . Therefore , w e hav e specifie d a wor k practic e standar d consistin g o f a n annua l vapo r tightnes s tes t whic hinvolve s pressurizin g th e empt ytan k an d measurin g anylos s o f pressure . Th e sam e approac hi s use d fo r carg o tank s i n tw o o f th e Federa l rule s tha t affec t gasolin e distribution , th e ne wsourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) fo r bul k gasolin e terminal s (4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , subpar t XX) , and th e Gasolin e Distributio n. NESHA P (4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t R) . Lea k Detectio nan d Repai r Progra mfo r Equipment . Th e LDARprogra mha s bee nuse d fo r man yyear s a s th e principa l
mean s o f locatin g leakin g equipmen t fo r repair s t o maintai n lo wemissio nrate s o n equipmen t components . I nsurveyin g OL D operation s nationwide , w e foun d tha t abou t 3 5 percen t o f th e facilitie s ar e unde r a Federa l LDARrequirement . Therefore , w e decide d tha t thi s forma t woul d b e th e bes t approac hfo r th e equipmen t requirements . Owner s an d operator s woul d hav e th e choic e betwee nth e LDAR 

# S"!

### 5 2

requirement s i n 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t TT o r UU . F . Howdi d we selec t the testing an d initia l complianc e reguirements ? Thes e NESHAP propos e t o contro l thre e differen t emissio npoints : storag e tanks , transfe r racks , an d equipmen t leaks . The contro l technologie s an d wor k practice s use d t o contro l thes e emissio npoint s woul d hav e differen t testing an d initia l complianc e requirements . Th e method s propose d fo r testing an d fo r demonstrating initia l complianc e wit hthe propose d standard s ar e simila r t o thos e i n othe r Federa l NESHAP using thes e sam e contro l technologie s an

d wor k practices . The HO N(4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t G) . prescribe s EP AMetho d 1 8 o r 25 Afo r determining the contro l efficiencyo f a contro l device . W e have adde d EPAMetho d 2 5 t o allowadditiona l flexibility . I naddition , i f a principa l componen t o f the inle t ga s strea mt o the contro l devic e i s formaldehyde , EPAMetho d 31 6 o f 4 0 CFR par t 63 , appendi xA , mayb e used instead o f Metho d 1 8 t o measur e the formaldehyde . Th e HO Nals o specifie s EP AMetho d 2 1 fo r performing LDA Rmonitoring . The visua l an d sea l ga

p inspection s require d fo r determining the initia l complianc e o f floating roo f tank s ar e the method s outline d i n subpar t W Wo f 4 0 CFR par t 63 . The EPAMetho d 2 7 i s the metho d require d fo r



# sr-5 3

confirmin g th e vapo r tightnes s o f tan k truck s an d railcar s equippe d wit hvapo r collectio n equipment . Thi s i s th e sam e approac hrequire d fo r testin g carg o tank s i n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t R , th e Gasolin e Distributio nNESHAP . W e hav e determine d whil e developin g othe r par t 6 3 rule s tha t thes e method s ar e appropriat e fo r fulfillin g th e testin g an d initia l complianc e requirement s i nstandard s fo r HA P emissions . G . Ho wdi d w e selec t th e continuou s complianc e requirements ? Continuou s monitorin g i s require d byth e propose d standard s s o tha t w e ca ndetermin e whethe r a sourc e i s i n complianc e o na nongoin g basis . Whe ndeterminin g appropriat e monitorin g options , w e considere d th e availabilit yand feasibilit yo f a numbe r o f monitorin g strategies . I nevaluatin g th e us e o f continuou s emissio nmonitorin g system s (CEMS ) i nthes e propose d standards , w e determine d tha t monitorin g o f HA P compound s emitte d fro mcontro l device s i s feasibl e and ha s bee nimplemente d i nothe r rule s a t certai ntype s o f facilities . However , th e cos t o f applyin g monitor s tha t provid e a continuou s measuremen t i n th e unit s o, f thes e propose d standard s woul d b e unacceptabl y high . Similarly , w e found tha t continuou s monitorin g o f a 

# _r s

### 5 4

HAP surrogat e (suc

ha s TOC ) woul d no t provid e an accurat e indicatio n o f complianc e wit hthe propose d HAP emissio n limitation s becaus e o f the man ynon-HAP organi c compounds . Monitoring o f contro l devic e operating parameter s i s considere d appropriat e fo r man yothe r emissio n source s (suc h a s gasolin e distributio n source s unde r 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t R ) and , therefore. , we have include d thi s a s th e primarymonitoring approac hi nthes e propose d standards . Base d on informatio n fro m OLD sources , we selecte d operating parameter s fo r the following type s o f contro l device s tha t ar e reliabl e indicator s o f contro l devic e performance : therma l an

d catalyti c oxidizers , flares , adsorbers , an d condensers . I n general , we selecte d parameter s an d monitoring provision s tha t wer e include d i n bot hsubpar t R an d the HON . Source s woul d monito r thes e parameter s t o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit hthe emissio n limit s an d operating limits . The propose d NESHAP als o require s monitoring fo r th e storag e tank wor k practic e standard s whic hconsis t o f periodi c inspection s o f the floatin g roo f seals . W e too k thi s approac hbecaus e ther e i s no devic e availabl e t o continuousl ymonito r the performanc e o f the roo f seals . Yo u maychoos e a

n alternative t o the monitoring require d b

ythes e propose d standards . I f yo u do , yo u mus t



# SHP.5 6



### 5 5 reques t approva l fo r alternative monitoring according t o th e procedure s i n §63. 8 o f the Genera l Provisions . H . Howdi d we selec t the notification , recordkeeping , an d reporting requirements ? Th e require d notification s an d othe r reporting ar e base d on the Genera l Provision s i nsubpar t Ao f 4 0 CFRpar t 63 . The initia l notificatio nan d the semiannua l complianc e report s includ e informatio n onorgani c liquid s an d affecte d OL D activities , an

d theyrequir e an

ychange s t o thi s informatio n t o b e reporte d i nsubsequen t reports . Similarly , record s ar e require d tha t wil l enabl e an inspecto r t o verif ythe facility' s complianc e status . Du e t o the natur e o f contro l device s tha t woul d b e installe d on OL D operation s an

d the emission s being controlled , w e hav e determine d tha t contro l devic e paramete r monitoring i s appropriat e i nthi s circumstance . The require d record s an d report s ar e necessaryt o allowthe regulatoryauthorit yt o verif ytha t the sourc e i s continuing t o compl ywit hth e standards . IV . Summar

y o f Environmental , Energy , an dEconomi c Impact s A s discusse d earlier , organi c liquid s distributio n activitie s ar e carrie d ou t a t man ydifferen t type s o f facilities . Mos t o f thes e facilitie s canbe groupe d unde r thre e genera l categories : stand-alon e (usuall yfor-hire ) 

# 335 6

storag e terminal s dedicate d t o distributio nactivities ; OL D operation s collocate d wit ha petroleu mrefinery , chemica l manufacturing , o r othe r manufacturin g plan t site ; an d crud e oi l pipelin e pumpin g o r breakou t station s (containin g crud e oi l tankage) . W e estimat e tha t i n 1997 , th e baselin e year - fo r th e propose d standards , ther e wer e approximatel yth e followin g number s o f majo r sourc e OL D facilities : 48 0 collocate d OL D operations , 13 5 stand-alon e terminals , and 3 5 crud e oi l pipelin e stations , fo r a tota l o f abou t 65 0 existin g majo r sourc e OL D plan t sites . A . Wha t ar e th e ai r qualit yimpacts ? O na nationwid e basis , th e OL D operation s a t facilitie s tha t woul d b e affecte d byth e propose d NESHA P emi t a n estimate d 70,20 0 Mg/y r (77,30 0 tons/yr ) o f HAP . Mos t o f th e organi c HA P liste d i nsectio n112(b)(1 ) o f th e CA Aar e include d i nthes e emissions . Afte r th e promulgate d standard s ar e implemented , HA P emission s wil l b e reduce d by approximatel y19,70 0 Mg/y r (21,70 0 tpy) , o r 2 8 percent , fro m th e baseline . Suc hemission s impact s ar e likel yt o reduc e th e ris k o f advers e effect s o f HAP . Althoug hth e propose d OL D NESHA P woul d no t specificall yrequir e contro l o f VO C emissions , th e organi c HA P emissio ncontro l technologie s upo nwhic hth e propose d



## sT ^

### 5 7

standard s ar e base d woul d als o significantl yreduc e VO C emission s fro

mthe sourc e category . W e estimat e tha t implementatio no f the promulgate d NESHAP woul d reduc e nationwid e VO C emission s b yabou t 33,70 0 Mg/yr (37,10 0 tpy) , o r 2 8 percent , fro

mbaselin e levels . Thi s wil l hav e th e effec t o f reducing ozone-relate d healt han d welfar e impacts . B . Wha t ar e the cos t impacts ? Th e cos t o f implementing the propose d standard s fo r affecte d OLD operation s woul d consis t o f the capita l an d annualize d cost s t o contro l storag e tanks , transfe r racks , an d equipmen t leaks , an d the cost s o f complying wit hth e monitoring , reporting , an d recordkeeping requirements . Approximatel y1,74 0 storag e tanks , o r 2 3 percen t o f the 7,72 5 tank s use d i n OL D operations , woul d need t o b e controlle d (o

r furthe r controlled ) t o mee t the propose d contro l requirements . Depending onthe siz e an d configuratio n o f a particula r tank , the capita l cos t woul d varyfro

m$4,30 0 t o $120,00 0 pe r tank . The tota l capita l cos t t o contro l al l 1,74 0 tank s i s estimate d a t $84. 3 million . Transfe r rac k control s woul d consis t o f installing a flar e o r othe r contro l devic e a t approximatel y20 0 OL D operations , a t a

nestimate d tota l capita l cos t o f $5. 4 million . Sinc e organi c liquid s carg o tank s ar e typicall y


# 31P.5 9



### 5 8 no t equippe d wit hvapo r collectio n equipment , mos t o f them woul d continu e t o underg o the DOT leak tightnes s testing an d no t the annua l EP

AMetho d 2 7 testing . The tota l annua l cos t fo r performing Metho d 2 7 onthe smal l numbe r o f equippe d carg o tank s i s estimate d a t abou t $21,70 0 pe r year . The establishmen t o f a nLDA Rprogra

mfo r equipmen t leak contro l a t abou t 43 0 existing operation s nationwid e woul d involv e a capita l cos t o f approximatel y$3. 5 million . Th e annua l cos t fo r industr yt o keep record s an d prepar e an

d sen d the necessaryreport s i s estimate d a t abou t $12. 7 millio n pe r year . W e hav e estimate d the tota l nationwid e capita l cos t (i n 199 7 dollars ) o f implementing the propose d rul e a t $94. 4 million , an

d the annua l cos t a t $41. 4 millio n pe r year . C . Wha t ar e the economi c impacts ? Th e economi c impac t analysi s show s tha t th e expecte d pric e increas e fo r affecte d outpu t woul d b e les s than 0.0 1 percen t a s a resul t o f the propose d standard fo r petroleu m producers , pipelin e operators , an d petroleu

mbul k terminals , an d les s than0.0 2 percen t fo r chemica l manufacturers . The expecte d chang e i n productio no f affecte d outpu t i s a reductio n o f les s than0.0 1 percen t fo r petroleu m producers , pipelin e operators , an d petroleu

mbul k terminals , an d les s tha n 0.0 2 percen t fo r chemical

- manufacturers . Non e o f th e



# £S

### 5 9

facilitie s ou t o f the 65 1 affecte d ar e expecte d t o clos e a s a resul t o f incurring cost s o f the propose d standard . Therefore , i t i s likel ytha t ther e i s n o advers e impac t expecte d t o occur fo r thos e industrie s tha t produc e outpu t affecte d b

ythi s propose d rule , sucha s chemica l manufacturers , petroleu mrefineries , pipelin e operators , an d petroleu

mbul k termina l operators . D . Wha t ar e the nonai r gualit yhealth , environmental , an d energ yimpacts ? Wate r qualit ywoul d no t b e significantl yaffecte d b y implementatio n o f the propose d standards . Th e propose d standard s d o no t contai n an yrequirement s relate d t o wate r discharges , wastewate r collection , o r spil l containment , an d
n o additiona l organi c liquid s ar e expecte d t o ente r .thes e area s a s a resul t o f the propose d OLD NESHAP . Afe w facilitie s mayselec t a scrubbe r (dependin g onthe specifi c emission s theyar e controlling ) t o contro l emission s from transfe r rack s o r fixed-roo f storag e tanks . Th e impac t on wate r qualit yfro

mthe us e o f scrubber s i s no t expecte d t o b e significant . W e als o projec t tha t ther e wil l b e n o significan t soli d wast e o r nois e impact . Neithe r flares , therma l oxidizers , scrubbers , no r condenser s generat e an ysoli d wast e a s a by

produc t o f thei r operation . Whe nadsorptio n system s ar e 

# S4P.6 1



### 6 0 used , the spen t activate d carbono r othe r adsorben t tha t canno t be furthe r regenerate d maybe dispose d o f i na landfill , whic hwoul d contribut e a smal l amoun t o f soli d waste . W e have teste d the nois e leve l fro mcontro l device s an d foun d thes e level s (usuallydu e t o pump s an d blowers ) t o b e moderat e (les s than 7 0 decibel s a t 7 meters) . Thus , th e nois e impac t woul d b e small . The contro l device s used fo r transfe r rac k an d storag e tank contro l us e electri c motor-drive nblowers , dampers , o r pumps , depending onthe typ e o f system , i nadditio n t o electroni c contro l an d monitoring systems . The installatio n o f thes e device s woul d have a smal l negative energ yimpact . T o th e exten t tha t som e o f the controlle d organi c liquid s ar e non-gasolin e fuels , the applie d contro l measure s woul d keep thes e liquid s i nthe distributio nsysteman d thu s hav e a positiv e impac t onthi s for m o f energy . V . Administrativ

e Requirement s A . Executive Orde r 12866 , RegulatoryPlanning an d Revie w Unde r Executive Orde r 1286 6 (5 8 F R51735 , Octobe r 4 , 1993 ) , the EPAmus t determin e whethe r the regulatoryactio n i s "significant " and , therefore , subjec t t o reviewb ythe Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t (OMB ) an

d the requirement s o f the Executive Order . The Executive Orde r define s



## L?oP.6 2

6 1 "significan t regulator yaction " a s on e tha t i s likel yt o resul t i na rul e tha t may : (1 ) Hav e a nannua l effec t o n th e econom yo f $10 0 millio no r mor e o r adversel yaffec t i na materia l wa yth e economy , a secto r o f th e economy , productivity , competition , jobs , th e environment , publi c healt ho r safety , o r State , local , o r triba l government s o r communities ; (2 ) Creat e a seriou s inconsistenc yo r otherwis e interfer e wit ha nactio n take n o r planne d byanothe r agency ; (3 ) Materiall yalte r th e budgetar yimpac t o f entitlements , grants , use r fees , o r loa nprograms , o r th e right s an d obligation s o f recipient s thereof ; o r (4 > Rais e nove l lega l o r polic yissue s arisin g ou t o f lega l mandates , th e President' s priorities , o r th e principle s se t fort hi n th e Executiv e Order . Pursuan t t o th e term s o f Executiv e Orde r 12866 , OM B ha s notifie d EP Atha t i t consider s thi s a "significan t regulator yaction " withi n th e meanin g o f th e Executiv e Order . EP Aha s submitte d thi s actio nt o OM B fo r review . Change s mad e i nrespons e t o OM B suggestion s o r recommendation s wil l b e documente d i nth e publi c record . An ywritte ncomment s fro mOM B and writte nEP Aresponse s ar e availabl e i nth e docke t (se e ADDRESSE S sectio no f thi s preamble) .

<__ _6 2

B . Executiv e Orde r 13132 , Federalis m Executiv e Orde r 13132 , entitle d "Federalism " (6 4 FR 43255 , Augus t 10 , 1999) , require s th e EP At o develo p a n accountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an d timel yinpu t byStat e and loca l official s i n th e developmen t o f regulator ypolicie s tha t hav e federalis mimplications. " "Policie s tha t hav e federalis mimplications " i s define d i n th e Executiv e Orde r t o includ e regulation s tha t hav e "substantia l direc t effect s o nth e States , o nth e relationshi p betwee n th e nationa l governmen t an d th e States , o r o nth e distributio n o f powe r and responsibilitie s amon g th e variou s level s o f government. " Unde r Sectio n6 o f Executiv e Orde r 13132 , th e EP Ama y no t issu e a regulatio n tha t ha s federalis mimplications , tha t impose s substantia l direc t complianc e costs , an d tha t i s no t require d b ystatute , unles s th e Federa l governmen t provide s th e fund s necessar yt o pa yth e direc t complianc e cost s incurre d byStat e and loca l governments , o r th e EP A consult s wit hStat e an d loca l official s earl yi nth e proces s o f developin g th e propose d regulation . Th e EP Aals o ma yno t issu e a regulatio ntha t ha s federalism-implication s an d tha t preempt s Stat e lawunles s th e EP Aconsult s wit hStat e an d loca l official s earl yi nth e proces s o f developin g th e propose d regulation . 

# 6 ?

### 6 3 Thi s propose d rul e doe s no t have federalis m implications . I t wil l no t have substantia l direc t effect s onth e States , onthe relationshi p betwee nthe nationa l governmen t an

d the States , o r onthe distributio no f powe r an d responsibilitie s amon g the variou s level s o f government , a s specifie d i n Executive Orde r 13132 . Thus , the requirement s o f section6 o f the Executiv e Orde r d o no t appl yt o thi s propose d rule . C . Executiv e Orde r 13175 , Consultatio nan d Coordinatio n wit hIndian Triba l Government s Executiv e Orde r 13175 , entitle d "Consultatio nan d Coordinatio nwit hIndianTriba l Governments " (6 5 F R672 4 9 , Novembe r 6 , 2000) , require s EP At o develop an accountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an d timel yinpu t b

ytriba l official s i n the developmen t o f regulatorypolicie s tha t hav e triba l implications. " "Policie s tha t hav e triba l implications " i s define d i n the Executiv e Orde r t o includ e regulation s tha t have "substantia l direc t effect s on on e o r mor e Indiantribes , onthe relationshi p betwee nthe Federa l governmen t an

d the Indian tribes , o r onthe distributio no f powe r an

d responsibilitie s betwee nthe Federa l governmen t an d Indian tribes. " Thi s propose d rul e doe s no t have triba l implications . I t wil l no t have substantia l direc t effect s ontriba l



# ^ 3

### 6 4

governments , on the relationshi p betwee nthe Federa l governmen t an

d Indian tribes , o r on the distributio no f powe r an

d responsibilitie s betwee nthe Federa l governmen t an d Indiantribes , a s specifie d i nExecutive Orde r 13175 . N o triba l government s ar e believe d t o ow n o r operat e an affecte d source . Thus , Executive Orde r 1317 5 doe s no t appl y t o thi s rule . I nthe spiri t o f Executive Orde r 13175 , an d consisten t wit hEP

Apolicyt o promot e communication s betwee n EPAan d triba l governments , EP Aspecificall ysolicit s additiona l commen t onthi s propose d rul e fro mtriba l officials . D . Executiv e Orde r 13045 , Protectio no f Childre nfro m Environmenta l Healt hRisk s an d SafetyRisk s Executiv e Orde r 1304 5 (6 2 F R19885 , Apri l 23 , 1997 ) applie s t o an

yrul e that : (1 ) i s determine d t o b e "economicall ysignificant " a s define d unde r Executiv e Orde r 12866 , an

d (2 ) concern s a

n environmenta l healt ho r safet y ris k tha t the EP

Aha s reason t o believe mayhav e a disproportionat e effec t onchildren . I f the regulatory actio nmeet s bot hcriteria , the EP Amus t evaluat e the environmenta l healt ho r safetyeffect s o f the planne d rul e on children , an

d explai n wh

ythe planne d regulatio ni s preferabl e t o othe r potentiall yeffective an d reasonabl y feasibl e alternative s considere d b ythe EPA . 

# <M

### 6 5 The EP Ainterpret s Executive Orde r 1304 5 a s applying onl yt o thos e regulatoryaction s tha t ar e base d on healt ho r safet yrisks , suchtha t the analysi s require d unde r sectio n 5-50 1 o f the Executiv e Orde r ha s the potentia l t o influenc e th e regulation . Thi s propose d rul e i s no t subjec t t o Executiv e Orde r 1304 5 becaus e i t i s base d on technolog y performanc e an

d no t on healt ho r safetyrisks . No children' s ris k analysi s wa s performe d becaus e n o alternativ e technologie s exis t tha t woul d provid e greate r stringencya t a reasonabl e cost . Furthermore , thi s propose d rul e ha s bee n determine d no t t o b e "economicall y significant " a s define d unde r Executive Orde r 12866 . E . Executiv e Orde r 13211 , Action s Concerning Regulation s Tha t Significantl yAffec t Energ ySupply , Distribution , o r Us e Executiv e Orde r 13211 , "Action s Concerning Regulation s Tha t Significantl yAffec t Energ ySupply , Distribution , o r Use " (6 6 Fed . Reg . 2835 5 (Ma y22 , 2001)) , provide s tha t agencie s shal l prepar e an d submi t t o the Administrato r o f th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d RegulatoryAffairs , Offic e o f Managemen t an

d Budget , a Statemen t o f Energ yEffect s fo r certai n action s identifie d a s "significan t energ yactions. " Sectio n 4(b ) o f Executiv e Orde r 1321 1 define s "significan t energ yactions " a s "an

yaction b

ya nagency(normall y 

# (A?

### 6 6

publishe d i n the Federa l Register ) tha t promulgate s o r i s expecte d t o lea

d t o the promulgatio n o f a fina l rul e o r regulation , including notice s o f inquiry , advanc e notice s o f propose d rulemaking , an d notice s o f propose d rulemaking : (1 ) (i ) tha t i s a significan t regulatoryactio n unde r Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 o r an

ysuccesso r order , an d (ii ) i s likel yt o hav e a significan t advers e effec t on the supply , distribution , o r us e o f energy ; o r (2 ) tha t i s designate d b y the Administrato r o f the Offic e o f Informatio nan d RegulatoryAffair s a s a significan t energ yaction. " Thi s rul e i s no t a "significan t energ yaction " becaus e i t i s no t likel yt o have a significan t advers e effec t on the supply , distribution , an

d us e o f energy . The basi s fo r thi s determinatio n i s a s follows : Th e reductio n i n petroleu mproduc t output , whic h include s reduction s i n fue l production , i s estimate d a t onl y 0.00 3 percent , o r abou t 13 7 barrel s pe r da ybase d on 200 0 U.S . fue l productio nnationwide . Th e reductio ni n coal , 

### natura l gas , an

d electricit youtpu t i s expecte d t o b e negligibl e compare d t o 200 0 U.S . outpu t o f thes e product s nationwide . The increas e i n pric e o f petroleu mproduct s i s estimate d t o be onl y0.00 3 percen t nationwide . Whil e energ y distributio n service s sucha s pipelin e operation s wil l b e directl yaffecte d b ythi s proposal , energ ydistributio n



## bG>

### 6 7

cost s ar e expecte d t o increas e b yonl y0.3 6 percent . W e estimat e tha t ther e wil l b e a sligh t increas e o f onl y0.00 2 percen t o f ne t import s (import s - exports) , an d n o othe r advers e outcome s ar e expecte d t o occur wit hregard s t o energ ysupplies . Give n the minima l impact s onenerg y supply , distribution , an d us e a s a whol e nationally , n o significan t advers e energ yeffect s ar e expecte d t o occur . Fo r mor e informatio non thes e estimate d energ yeffects , pleas e refe r t o the economi c impac t analysi s fo r the propose d rule . Thi s analysi s i s availabl e i n the publi c docket . Therefore , we conclud e tha t thi s proposa l rul e whe n implemente d wil l no t have a significan t advers e effec t on th e supply , distribution , o r us e o f energy . F . Unfunde d Mandate s Refor mAc t o f 199 5 Titl e I I o f the Unfunde d Mandate s Refor mAc t o f 199 5 (UMRA) , Publi c Law104-4 , establishe s requirement s fo r Federa l agencie s t o asses s the effect s o f thei r regulatory action s onState , local , an d triba l government s an d th e privat e sector . Unde r sectio n 20 2 o f the UMRA , the EPA generall ymus t prepar e a writte n statement , including a cost-benefi t analysis , fo r propose d an d fina l rule s wit h "Federa l mandates " tha t mayresul t i n expenditure s b yState , local , an

d triba l governments , i naggregate , o r b yth e



# 4 76 8

privat e sector , o f $10 0 millio no r mor e i nany1 year . Befor e promulgatin g a nEP Arul e fo r whic ha writte n statemen t i s needed , sectio n20 5 o f th e UMRAgenerall y require s th e EP At o identif yand conside r a reasonabl e numbe r o f regulator yalternative s and adop t th e leas t costly , mos t cost-effective , o r leas t burdensom e alternativ e tha t achieve s th e objective s o f th e rule . Th e provision s o f sectio n20 5 d o no t appl ywhe nthe yar e inconsisten t wit h applicabl e law . Moreover , sectio n20 5 allow s th e EP At o adop t a nalternativ e othe r tha nth e leas t costly , mos t cost-effective , o r leas t burdensom e alternativ e i f th e Administrato r publishe s wit hth e fina l rul e a nexplanatio n o f whytha t alternativ e wa s no t adopted . Befor e th e EP A establishe s anyregulator yrequirement s tha t ma y significantl yo r uniquel yaffec t smal l governments , includin g triba l governments , i t mus t hav e develope d unde r sectio n20 3 o f th e UMRAa smal l governmen t agenc yplan . Th e pla nmus t provid e fo r notifyin g potentiall yaffecte d smal l governments , enablin g official s o f affecte d smal l government s t o hav e meaningfu l and timel yinpu t i nth e developmen t o f EP Aregulator yproposal s wit hsignifican t Federa l intergovernmenta l mandates , and informing , educating , and advisin g smal l government s o ncomplianc e wit h th e regulator yrequirements .



# b<2

### 6 9 Th e EPAha s determine d tha t thi s propose d rul e doe s no t contai na Federa l mandat e tha t mayresul t i n expenditure s o f $10 0 millio n o r mor e fo r State , local , an d triba l governments , i n the aggregate , o r the privat e secto r i nan y 1 year . Th e maximu mtota l annua l cos t o f thi s propose d rul e fo r an yyea r ha s bee n estimate d t o b e abou t $41. 4 million . Thus , today' s propose d rul e i s no t subjec t t o th e requirement s o f section s 20 2 an d 20 5 o f th e UMRA . I n addition , the EPAha s determine d tha t thi s propose d rul e contain s n o regulatoryrequirement s tha t migh t significantl y o r uniquel yaffec t smal l government s becaus e i t contain s n o requirement s tha t appl yt o suchgovernment s o r impos e obligation s upo nthem . Therefore , today' s propose d rul e i s no t subjec t t o the requirement s o f sectio n 20 3 o f the UMRA . G . RegulatoryFlexibilit yAc t (RFA ) a s amende d b vth e Smal l Busines s RegulatoryEnforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t o f 199 6 (SBREFA) , 5 U.S.C . 60 1 e t sea . Th e RF Agenerall yrequire s a nagencyt o prepar e a regulatoryflexibilit yanalysi s o f an yrul e subjec t t o notic e an

d commen t rulemaking requirement s unde r th e Administrativ e Procedur e Ac t o r an yothe r statut e unles s the agenc ycertifie s tha t the rul e wil l no t hav e a significan t economi c impac t on a substantia l numbe r o f smal l entities . Smal l entitie s includ e smal l businesses , smal l

_»• .P.7 1



### 7 0 organizations , an

d smal l governmenta l jurisdictions . Fo r purpose s o f assessing the impact s o f today' s propose d rul e on smal l entities , smal l entit yi s define d as : (1 ) a smal l busines s whos e paren t compan yha s fewe r than 10 0 o r 1,50 0 employees , depending onsiz e definitio nfo r the affecte d Standard Industria l Classificatio n (SIC ) o r Nort h America n Industr

yClassificatio nSystem(NAICS ) code , o r a maximu mo f $ 5 millio n t o $18. 5 millio n i nrevenues ; (2 ) a smal l governmenta l jurisdictio ntha t i s a governmen t o f a city , county , town , schoo l distric t o r specia l distric t wit h
a populatio n o f les s than 50,000 ; an d (3 ) a smal l organizatio n tha t i s an ynot-for-profi t enterpris e whic hi s independentl yowne d an d operate d an

d i s no t dominan t i nit s field . I t shoul d b e note d tha t companie s i n 2 6 4-digi t SI C code s an

d 4 2 NAIC S code s ar e affecte d b ythi s propose d rule , an d the smal l busines s definitio napplie d t o eac hindustry b ySI C cod e o r NAIC S cod e i s tha t liste d i n the Smal l Busines s Administratio n(SBA ) siz e standard s (1 3 CFR121) . Fo r mor e informatio n onsiz e standard s fo r particula r industries , pleas e refe r t o the economi c impac t analysi s i n th e docket . Afte r considering the economi c impact s o f today' s propose d rul e on smal l entities , I certif ytha t thi s actio n wil l no t have a significan t economi c impac t ona substantia l


# 70

### 7 1

numbe r o f smal l entities . W e have determine d tha t onl y ninetee n smal l firms i nthe industrie s affecte d b ythi s rul e mayb e affected . Ou t o f the ninetee naffecte d smal l firms , onl ytwo firms ar e estimate d t o have complianc e cost s tha t excee d on e percen t o f thei r revenues . Th e reporte d impact s o n the smal l firms ar e therefor e no t considere d t o b e significant . I n addition , the rul e i s likel yt o als o increas e profit s a t the man ysmal l firms no t affecte d b yth e rul e du e t o the ver ysligh t increas e i nmarke t prices . Finally , whil e ther e i s a differenc e betwee n the media n complianc e cos t t o sale s estimate s fo r the affecte d smal l an d larg e firms (0.2 6 percen t compare d t o 0.0 1 percent.fo r th e larg e firms) , n o smal l o r larg e firms ar e expecte d t o clos e i n respons e t o incurring the complianc e cost s associate d wit hthi s rule . Therefore , the affecte d smal l firm s ar e no t disproportionatel yaffecte d b ythi s rul e a s compare d t o the affecte d larg e firms . I t shoul d b e note d tha t thes e result s ar e th e same i n thi s cas e regardles s o f howthe affecte d industrie s ar e classified , eithe r b ythe NAIC S o r b

ythe SI C system . Th e result s ar e the sam e becaus e the smal l busines s siz e definition s applie d t o firms i n the affecte d NAIC S code s ar e identica l t o thos e i n the corresponding SI C codes . Althoughthi s propose d rul e wil l no t have a significan t



# 11

### 7 2

economi c impac t on a substantia l numbe r o f smal l entities , w e nonetheles s have tried t o minimiz e the impac t o f thi s rul e on smal l entitie s i nsevera l ways . First , we chos e t o se t th e contro l requirement s a t the MAC T floo r contro l leve l an d no t a t a contro l leve l mor e stringent . Thus , th e contro l leve l specifie d i n the propose d OL D rul e i s th e leas t stringen t allowe d b ythe CAA . Second , we have se t facilit ysize , transfe r rac k throughput , an d tank siz e cutoff s i nthe rul e t o minimiz e the effect s onsmal l businesses . Third , we have identifie d a lis t o f 6 9 HAP fro m the lis t o f 18 8 i nthe CA At o b e considere d fo r regulation . Regulate d liquid s ar e organi c liquid s tha t contai n a t leas t 5 percen t b

yweigh t o f the 6 9 HAP listed . I naddition , w e worke d wit hvariou s trad e association s during the developmen t o f the propose d rule . Thes e action s have reduce d the economi c impac t onsmal l entitie s fro mthi s rule . W e continu e t o b e intereste d i nth e potentia l impact s o f th e propose d rul e on smal l entitie s an d welcome comment s on issue s relate d t o suchimpacts . H . Paperwor k Reductio n Ac t W e wil l submi t the informatio n collectio nrequirement s i n thi s rul e fo r approva l t o the Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t unde r the Paperwork Reductio nAct , 4 4 U.S.C . 350 1 e t seq . W e hav e prepare d an Informatio nCollectio nReques t



# 7 P

### 7 3

(ICR ) documen t (IC

RNo . 1963.01 ) an

d yo u mayobtai na cop y fro mSand yFarmer , Offic e o f Environmenta l Information , Collectio n Strategie s Division , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(2822) , 120 0 Pennsylvani a Avenue , NW , Washington , DC 20460 , b ye-mai l a t farmer.sandy@epa.gov , o r b ycalling (202 ) 260-2740 . Acop ymayals o b e downloade d of f th e interne t (WWW ) a t http://www.epa.gov/icr . Th e informatio nrequirement s ar e no t effectiv e unti l OMB approve s them . Th e informatio n requirement s ar e base d o n notification , recordkeeping , an

d reporting requirement s i n the NESHAP Genera l Provision s (4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t A) , whic har e mandatoryfo r al l operator s subjec t t o nationa l emissio n standards . Thes e recordkeeping an d reporting requirement s ar e specificall yauthorize d b ysectio n11 4 o f the CA A(4 2 U.S.C . 7414) . Al l informatio nsubmitte d t o the EPApursuan t t o th e recordkeeping an d reporting requirement s fo r whic ha clai mo f confidentialit yi s mad e i s safeguarde d according t o EPApolicie s se t fort hi n 4 0 CFRpar t 2 , subpar t B . The propose d rul e woul d requir e maintenanc e inspection s o f the contro l device s bu t woul d no t requir e an y notification s o r report s beyon d thos e require d b ythe Genera l Provisions . The recordkeeping requirement s requir e onl ythe specifi c informatio nneede d t o determin e



# 7 37 4

compliance . Th e annua l monitoring , reporting , and recordkeepin g burde nt o affecte d source s fo r thi s collectio n(average d
ove r th e firs t 3 year s afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f th e promulgate d rule ) i s estimate d t o b e 242,90 0 labor-hour s pe r year , wit ha tota l annua l cos t o f $12. 7 millio npe r year . Thes e estimate s includ e a one-tim e performanc e tes t an d repor t (wit hrepea t test s wher e needed) , one-tim e submissio n o f a nSSM P wit hsemiannua l report s fo r anyeven t whe nth e procedure s i nth e pla n wer e no t followed , semiannua l complianc e reports , maintenanc e inspections , notifications , an d recordkeeping . Burde nmean s th e tota l time , effort , o r financia l
resource s expende d byperson s t o generate , maintain , retain , o r disclos e o r provid e informatio n t o o r fo r a Federa l agency . Thi s include s th e tim e neede d t o revie w instructions ; develop , acquire , install , and utiliz e technolog yan d system s fo r th e purpose s o f collecting , validating , an d verifyin g information , processin g an d maintainin g information , and disclosin g and providin g information ; adjus t th e existin g way s t o compl ywit hany previousl yapplicabl e instruction s and requirements ; trai n personne l t o b e abl e t o respon d t o a collectio no f information ; searc hdat a sources ; complet e an d revie wth e 

# 7 #

### 7 5

collectio n o f information ; an d transmi t o r otherwis e disclos e the information . A n Agenc ymayno t conduc t o r sponsor , an d a perso ni s no t require d t o respon d to , a collectio n o f informatio n unles s i t display s a currentl yvali d OMB contro l number . Th e OMB contro l number s fo r the EPA' s regulation s ar e liste d i n 4 0 CFRpar t 9 an d 4 8 CFRchapte r 15 . I . Nationa l Technolog yTransfe r an

d Advancemen t Ac t Unde r sectio n 12(d ) o f the Nationa l Technolog yTransfe r an d Advancemen t Ac t o f 199 5 (NTTAA) , Publi c Law104-113 , al l Federa l agencie s ar e require d t o us e voluntaryconsensu s standard s (VCS ) i n thei r regulator yan d procuremen t activitie s unles s t o d o s o woul d b e inconsisten t wit h applicabl e la

wo r otherwis e impractical . Voluntary consensu s standard s ar e technica l standard s (e.g.,-material s specifications , tes t methods , sampling procedures , busines s practices ) develope d o r adopte d b yone o r mor e voluntary consensu s bodies . The NTTA Arequire s Federa l agencie s t o provid e Congress , throughannua l report s t o OMB , wit h explanation s whe n a nagencydoe s no t us e availabl e an d applicabl e VCS . Consisten t wit hthe NTTAA , the EP Aconducte d searche s t o identif yVC S fo r us e i nemission s monitoring . Thi s searc hi s describe d i n a memorandu mwhic hi s i nthe docket . 

# IA

### 7 6

The searc hfo r emission s monitoring procedure s identifie d 1 9 VC S tha t appeare d t o have possibl e us e i n lie u o f EPA standard referenc e methods . However , afte r reviewing th e availabl e VCS , the EP Adetermine d tha t nin e o f the candidat e VC S identifie d fo r measuring emission s o f the HAP o r surrogate s subjec t t o emissio nstandard s i nthe propose d rul e woul d no t b e practica l du e t o lac k o f equivalency , documentation , an

d validatio ndata . Te no f the remaining candidat e VC S ar e unde r developmen t o r unde r EP Areview . Th e EPAplan s t o follow , review , an d conside r adopting thes e VC S afte r thei r developmen t an d furthe r reviewb

ythe EPAi s completed . Two VCS , ASTMD2879-83 , Standard Tes t Metho d fo r Vapo r Pressure-Temperatur e Relationshi p an d Initia l Decompositio n Temperatur e o f Liquid s b yIsoteniscope ; an

d AP I Publicatio n 2517 , Evaporative Los s fro mExterna l Floating-Roo f Tanks , Thir d Edition , Februar y1989 , wer e alread yincorporate d b

y referenc e i n 4 0 CFR63.1 4 an d ar e als o being used i nthi s propose d rule . Th e ASTMD6420-9 9 i s currentl yunde r EPAreviewa s a n approve d alternative t o Metho d 18 . The EPAwil l als o compar e thi s fina l ASTMstandard t o method s previousl y approve d a s alternative s t o EP AMetho d 1 8 wit hspecifi c applicabilit ylimitations . Thes e methods , designate d a s



# 7 £

### 7 7

ALT-01 7 an

d CTM-028 , ar e availabl e throughthe EPA' s Emissio n Measuremen t Cente r interne t sit e a t www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html . The fina l ASTMD6420-9 9 standar d i s ver

ysimila r t o thes e approve d alternativ e methods , whic hmayb e equall ysuitabl e fo r specifi c applications . W e plan t o continu e our reviewo f the fina l standar d an

d wil l conside r adopting the ASTMstandard a t a late r date . Th e EPAi s requesting commen t onthe complianc e demonstratio nrequirement s being propose d i nthi s propose d rul e an d specificall yinvite s the publi c t o identif y potentially-applicabl e VCS . Commenter s shoul d als o explai n wh ythi s propose d rul e shoul d adop t thes e VC S i nlie u o f th e EPA' s standards . Emissio n tes t method s an d performanc e specification s submitte d fo r evaluatio nshoul d b e accompanie d b

ya basi s fo r the recommendation , including metho d validatio n dat a an d the procedur e use d t o validat e th e candidat e metho d (i f a metho d othe r thanMetho d 301 , 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , appendi xAwa s used) . Sectio n 63.240 6 an

d Tabl e 5 o f the propose d subpar t lis t the EPAtesting method s an d performanc e standard s include d i n the propose d rule . Mos t o f the standard s hav e bee n use d b

yState s an

d industr

yfo r mor e than1 0 years . Nevertheless , unde r §63.7(f ) o f subpar t Ao f 4 0 CFRpar t 63 ,



# 7 7

### NESHAP : Organi c Liquid s Distribution—Pag e 7 8 o f 16 8

the proposa l als o allow s an yStat e o r sourc e t o appl yt o the EPAfo r permissio n t o us e a n alternative metho d i nplac e o f an yo f the EP

Atesting method s o r performanc e standard s liste d i n propose d subpar t EEEE . Lis t o f Subject s i n 4 0 CFRPar t 6 3 Environmenta l protection , Ai r pollutio ncontrol , Hazardou s substances , Incorporation b yreference , Reporting an d recordkeeping requirements .

Dated :

Christin e Tod

d Whitman , Administrator .

Fo r the reason s state d i nthe preamble , titl e 40 , chapte r I , par t 6 3 o f the Cod e o f Federa l Regulation s i s propose d t o b e amende d a s follows : PART 63--[AMENDED ] 1 . Th e authorit ycitatio nfo r par t 6 3 continue s t o read a s follows : Authority : 4 2 U.S.C . 7401 , e t seq . 2 . Sectio n 63.1 4 i s amende d b yrevising paragraph s (b ) (3 ) an d (c)(1 ) t o rea

d a s follows : §63.1 4 Incorporatio n b vreference . 

# 7 S

### 7 9

**** * (b ) * * * (3 ) AST MD2879-83 , Standar d Tes t Metho d fo r Vapo r Pressure-Temperatur e Relationshi p an d Initia l Decompositio n Temperatur e o f Liquid s b yIsoteniscope , IB Rapprove d fo r §63.11 1 o f subpar t Go f thi s par t an d fo r §63.240 6 o f * subpar t EEE E o f thi s part . (c ) * * * (1 ) AP I Publicatio n2517 , Evaporativ e Los s fro m Externa l Floating-Roo f Tanks , Thir d Edition , Februar y1989 , IB Rapprove d fo r §63.11 1 o f subpar t Go f thi s par t an d fo r §63.240 6 o f subpar t EEE E o f thi s part .

**** * 3 . Par t 6 3 i s propose d t o b e amende d b yaddin g subpar t EEE E t o rea d a s follows : Subpar t EEE E - Nationa l Emissio nStandard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n(non-Gasoline ) Sec . Wha t Thi s Subpar t Cover s 63.233 0 Wha t i s th e purpos e o f thi s subpart ? 63.233 4 A mI subjec t t o thi s subpart ? 63.233 8 Wha t part s o f m yplan t doe s thi s subpar t cover ? 63.234 2 Whe nd o I hav e t o compl ywit hthi s subpart ? Emissio nLimitation s an dWor kPractic e Standard s 63.234 6 Wha t emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standard s mus t I meet ? Genera l Complianc e Requirement s 63.235 0 Wha t ar e m ygenera l requirement s fo r complyin g wit h 

# 3ALP.8 1

8 0 thi s subpart ? Testin gandInitia l Complianc e Requirement s 63.235 4 Bywha t dat e mus t I conduc t performanc e test s o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstrations ? 63.235 8 Whe nmus t I conduc t subsequen t performanc e tests ? 63.236 2 Wha t performanc e tests , desig nevaluations , an d performanc e evaluation s mus t I conduct ? 63.236 6 Wha t ar e mymonitorin g installation , operation , an d maintenanc e requirements ? 63.237 0 Ho wd o I demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standards ? Continuou s Complianc e Requirement s 63.237 4 Ho wd o I monito r and collec t dat a t o demonstrat e continuou s compliance ? 63.237 8 Ho wd o I demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimitation s and wor k practic e standards ? Notifications , Reports , andRecord s 63.238 2 Wha t notification s mus t I submi t an d when ? 63.238 6 Wha t report s mus t I submi t and when ? 63.239 0 Wha t record s mus t I keep ? 63.239 4 I nwha t formand ho wlon g mus t I kee p myrecords ? Othe r Requirement s andInformatio n 63.239 8 Wha t part s o f th e Genera l Provision s appl yt o me ? 63.240 2 Wh o implement s and enforce s thi s subpart ? 63.240 6 Wha t definition s appl yt o thi s subpart ? 63.2407-.242 9 [Reserved ] Table s Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Limit s Tabl e Pract i Tabl e Emiss i Tabl e Opera t Tabl e Pract i Tabl e 1 t o subpar t EEE E 2 t o subpar t EEE E 3 t o subpar t EEE E 4 t o subpar t EEE E 5 t o subpar t EEE E 6 t o subpar t EEE E - 7 t o subpar t EEE E - c e Standard s 8 t o subpar t EEE E - o nLimit s 9 t o subpar t EEE E - in g Limit s 1 0 t o subpar t EEE E c e Standard s 1 1 t o subpar t EEE E Organi c Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s Emissio nLimit s Operatin g Limit s Wor k Practic e Standard s Requirement s fo r Performanc e Test s Initia l Complianc e wit hEmissio n

• Initia l Complianc e wit hWor k

• Continuou s Complianc e wit h

• Continuou s Complianc e wit h

- Continuou s Complianc e wit hWor k

- Requirement s fo r Report s


## <Z.OP.8 2



### 8 1 Tabl e 1 2 t o subpar t EEE E - Applicabilit yo f Genera l Provision s t o Subpar t EEE E WHA T THI S SUBPAR T COVER S §63.233 0 Wha t i s th e purpos e o f thi s subpart ? Thi s subpar t establishe s nationa l emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standard s fo r hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAP ) emitte d fro morgani c liquid s distributio n(OLD)(non

gasoline ) operations . Thi s subpar t als o establishe s requirement s t o demonstrat e initia l and continuou s complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standards . §63.233 4 A

m I subjec t t o thi s subpart ? (a ) Yo u ar e subjec t t o thi s subpar t i f yo u ow no r operat e a nOL D operatio ntha t i s locate d a t o r i s par t o f a majo r sourc e o f hazardou s ai r pollutan t emissions . (b ) You r OL D operatio nmus t hav e a tota l organi c liquid s throughpu t o f 27. 6 millio nliter s (7.2 9 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r mor e eithe r int o o r ou t o f th e operatio nt o b e subjec t t o th e contro l provision s o f thi s subpart . Organi c liquid s ar e al l crud e oil s othe r tha n blac k oil , an d thos e liquid s o r liqui d mixtures , excep t gasoline , tha t contai na tota l o f 5 percen t b yweigh t o r
mor e o f th e organi c HA P liste d i nTabl e 1 o f thi s subpart . (1 ) A nOL D operatio ni s th e combinatio no f activitie s
an d equipmen t use d t o transfe r organi c liquid s int o o r ou t 

# *1P.8 3

8 2

o f a plan t sit e o r t o stor e organi c liquid s o nth e plan t site . Gasoline , a s wel l a s an yfuel s tha t ar e consume d o r dispense d o nth e plan t sit e directl yt o user s (suc ha s fuel s
use d fo r flee t refueling ) ar e no t considere d organi c liquid s i nthi s subpart . (2 ) Amajo r sourc e o f HA P i s a plan t sit e tha t emit s
o r ha s th e potentia l t o emi t an ysingl e HA P a t a rat e o f 9.0 7 megagram s (1 0 tons ) o r mor e pe r year , o r an y combinatio no f HA P a t a rat e o f 22.6 8 megagram s (2 5 tons ) o r
mor e pe r year . (c ) Thi s subpar t covers : (1 ) Organi c liquid s distributio noperation s tha t occup ya nentir e plan t site ; an d (2 ) Organi c liquid s distributio noperation s tha t ar e collocate d wit hothe r industria l (e.g. , manufacturing ) operation s a t th e sam e plan t site . §63.233 8 Wha t part s o f m yplan t doe s thi s subpar t cover ? (a ) Thi s subpar t applie s t o eac hnew , reconstructed , o r existin g OL D operatio naffecte d source . (b)(1 ) Th e affecte d sourc e i s eac hentir e OL D operatio na t a plan t sit e i nan yindustria l category , excep t fo r thos e emissio nsource s tha t ar e controlle d unde r th e provision s o f anothe r 4 0 CF Rpar t 6 3 nationa l emissio n standard s fo r hazardou s ai r pollutant s regulation . Th e mai n



## £> Z

### 8 3

type s o f plan t site s tha t eithe r ar e i nthemselve s an OL D operatio n o r contai n a collocate d OL D operatio nare : (i ) Liqui d termina l facilitie s tha t distribut e eithe r organi c liquid s tha t theyown , o r organi c liquid s owne d b y other s on a for-hir e basis , o r a combinatio no f both ; (ii ) Organi c chemica l manufacturing facilities , petroleu

mrefineries , an

d othe r industria l facilitie s tha t hav e a collocate d OL D operation ; an d (iii ) Crud e oi l pipelin e pumping station s an d breakou t stations . (2 ) The following emissio nsource s withi nOL D operation s constitut e the affecte d source : storag e tank s storing organi c liquid s an d meeting the tank siz e an d liqui d vapo r pressur e cutoff s i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart ; transfe r rac k loading position s a t whic horgani c liquid s ar e loade d int o carg o tank s (tan k truck s o r railcars ) a t o r abov e th e minimu m throughpu t show

n i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart ; an d equipmen t (pumps , valves , etc. ) i n organi c liquid s servic e fo r a t leas t 30 0 hour s pe r year . I naddition , vapo r leakag e point s on carg o tank s whil e loading organi c liquid s a t affecte d transfe r rack s ar e considere d par t o f the affecte d source . (c ) The provision s o f thi s subpar t d o no t appl yt o researc han

d developmen t facilities , consisten t wit hsectio n



# £ 38 4 112(b)(7 ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t (CAA) . (d ) A naffecte d sourc e i s a ne waffecte d sourc e i f yo u
commence d constructio no f th e affecte d sourc e afte r [INSER T DAT E O F PUBLICATIO NO F THI S PROPOSE D RUL E I NTH E FEDERA L REGISTER ] an d yo u mee t th e applicabilit ycriteri a i n §63.233 4 a t th e tim e yo u commence d operation . (e ) A naffecte d sourc e i s reconstructe d i f yo u mee t th e criteri a fo r reconstructio na s define d i n§63.2 . (f ) A naffecte d sourc e i s existin g i f i t i s no t ne wo r reconstructed . §63.234 2 Whe nd o I hav e t o compl ywit hthi s subpart ? (a ) I f yo u hav e a ne wo r reconstructe d affecte d

source , yo u mus t compl ywit hthi s subpar t accordin g t o th e guidanc e i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) an d (2 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) I f yo u startu p you r affecte d sourc e befor e th e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t compl ywit hth e emissio n limitation s an d wor k practic e standard s fo r ne wan d reconstructe d source s i nthi s subpar t n o late r tha nth e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart . (2 ) I f yo u startu p you r affecte d sourc e afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t compl ywit hth e emissio n limitation s an d wor k practic e standard s fo r ne wan d reconstructe d source s i nthi s subpar t upo nstartu p o f you r affecte d source .



## <2H8 5 (b ) I f yo u hav e a nexistin g affecte d source , yo u mus t compl ywit hth e emissio nlimitation s and wor k practic e standard s fo r existin g source s n o late r tha n[ 3 year s afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f th e fina l rule] . (c ) I f yo u hav e a nare a sourc e tha t increase s it s emission s o r it s potentia l t o emi t suc htha t i t become s a majo r sourc e o f HAP , th e guidanc e i nparagraph s (c)(1 ) an d (2 ) o f thi s sectio napplies : (1 ) An yportio no f th e existin g facilit ytha t i s a ne w affecte d sourc e o r a ne wreconstructe d sourc e mus t b e i n complianc e wit hthi s subpar t upo n startup . (2 ) Al l othe r part s o f th e sourc e mus t b e i n complianc e wit hthi s subpar t n o late r tha n3 year s afte r i t become s a majo r source . (d ) Yo u mus t mee t th e notificatio n requirement s i n §63.2382(a ) accordin g t o th e schedul e i n§63.2382(b) , (c) , (d) , an d (e ) and i nsubpar t Ao f thi s part . Som e o f th e notification s mus t b e submitte d befor e yo u ar e require d t o compl ywit hth e emissio n limitation s and wor k practic e standard s i nthi s subpart . EMISSION

LIMITATION S ANDWORKPRACTIC E STANDARD S §63.234 6 Wha t emissio n limitation s and wor k practic e standard s mus t I meet ? (a ) Yo u mus t mee t eac hemissio nlimi t i nTabl e 2 o f



## __£_ £P.8 7

8 6 thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Yo u mus t mee t eac hoperatin g limi t i nTabl e 3 o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (c ) Yo u mus t mee t eac hwor k practic e standar d i nTabl e 4 o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (d ) A s provide d i n§63.6(g) , yo u ma yreques t approva l fro mth e EP At o us e a nalternativ e t o th e wor k practic e standard s i nthi s section . I f yo u appl yfo r permissio nt o
us e a nalternativ e t o th e wor k practic e standard s i nthi s section , yo u mus t submi t th e informatio ndescribe d i n §63.6(g)(2) . GENERA L COMPLIANC E REQUIREMENT S §63.235 0 Wha t ar e m vgenera l reguirement s fo r complyin g wit hthi s subpart ? (a ) Yo u mus t b e i ncomplianc e wit hth e emissio n limitation s an d wor k practic e standard s i nthi s subpar t a t al l times , excep t durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunction . (b ) Yo u mus t alway s operat e an d maintai nyou r affecte d

source , includin g ai r pollutio ncontro l an d monitorin g equipment , accordin g t o th e provision s i n§63.6(e)(1)(i) . (c ) Yo u mus t develo p an d implemen t a writte nstartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio npla n(SSMP ) accordin g t o th e provision s i n§63.6(e)(3) .


# <&bP.8 8

8 7 TESTINGANDINITIAL COMPLIANC E REQUIREMENT S §63.235 4 Bywha t dat e mus t I conduc t performanc e test s o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstrations ? (a ) Fo r existin g sources , yo u mus t conduc t initia l performanc e test s and othe r initia l complianc e demonstration s n o late r tha n th e complianc e dat e specifie d i n§63.2342(b) . (b ) Fo r ne wsources , yo u mus t conduc t initia l performanc e test s an d othe r initia l complianc e demonstration s accordin g t o th e provision s i n§63.7(a ) (2 ) (i )
an d (ii) . §63.235 8 Whe nmus t I conduc t subsequen t performanc e tests ? (a ) Fo r carg o tank s equippe d wit hvapo r collectio n equipmen t tha t loa d organi c liquid s a t affecte d transfe r rac k loadin g positions , yo u mus t perfor mthe.vapo r tightnes s testin g require d i nTabl e 5 o f thi s subpar t o neac hcarg o tan k tha t yo u owno r operat e a t leas t onc e pe r year . (b ) Fo r nonflar e contro l devices , yo u mus t conduc t th e performanc e testin g require d i nTabl e 5 o f thi s subpar t a t
anytim e th e EP Arequest s yo u t o i naccordanc e wit hsectio n 11 4 o f th e CAA . §63.236 2 Wha t performanc e tests , desig nevaluations , an d performanc e evaluation s mus t I conduct ? (a ) Yo u mus t conduc t eac hperformanc e tes t i nTabl e 5



## _?78 8

o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Yo u mus t conduc t eac hperformanc e tes t accordin g t o th e requirement s i n§63.7(e)(1) , usin g th e procedure s specifie d i n§63.997(e) . (c ) Yo u mus t conduc t thre e separat e tes t run s fo r eac h performanc e tes t o na nonflar e contro l device , a s specifie d i n§63.7(e)(3) . Eac htes t ru nmus t las t a t leas t 1 hour . (d ) I n additio nt o Metho d 2 5 o r 25 Ao f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , t o determin e complianc e wit hth e organi c HA P o r tota l organi c compound s (TOC ) emissio nlimit , yo u ma yus e Metho d 1 8 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA . I f yo u us e Metho d 1 8 t o measur e complianc e wit hth e percentag e efficienc y limit , yo u mus t firs t determin e whic hHA P ar e presen t i nth e inle t ga s strea m(i.e. , uncontrolle d emissions ) usin g knowledg e o f th e organi c liquid s o r th e screenin g procedur e describe d i nMetho d 18 . I nconductin g th e performanc e test , yo u mus t analyz e sample s collecte d a s specifie d i nMetho d 18 , simultaneousl ya t th e inle t an d outle t o f th e contro l device . Quantif yth e emission s fo r al l HA P identifie d a s presen t i nth e inle t ga s strea mfo r bot hth e inle t an d outle t ga s stream s o f th e contro l device . (e ) I f yo u us e Metho d 1 8 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A , t o measur e complianc e wit hth e emissio nconcentratio n limit , yo u mus t firs t determin e whic hHA P ar e presen t i nth e



# _ £8 9 inle t ga s strea musin g knowledg e o f th e organi c liquid s o r th e screenin g procedur e describe d i nMetho d 18 . I n conductin g th e performanc e test , analyz e sample s collecte d

a s specifie d i nMetho d 1 8 a t th e outle t o f th e contro l device . Quantif yth e contro l devic e outle t emissio n concentratio nfo r th e sam e HA P identifie d a s presen t i nth e inle t o r uncontrolle d ga s stream . (f ) I f a principa l componen t o f th e uncontrolle d o r inle t ga s strea mt o th e contro l devic e i s formaldehyde , yo u
ma yus e Metho d 31 6 o f appendi xAo f thi s par t instea d o f Metho d 1 8 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , fo r measurin g th e formaldehyde . I f formaldehyd e i s th e predominan t HA P i nth e inle t ga s stream , yo u ma yus e Metho d 31 6 alon e t o measur e formaldehyd e eithe r a t th e inle t an d outle t o f th e contro l devic e usin g th e formaldehyd e contro l efficienc ya s a surrogat e fo r tota l organi c HA P o r TO C efficiency , o r a t th e outle t o f a combustio ndevic e fo r determinin g complianc e wit hth e emissio nconcentratio nlimit . (g ) Yo u mus t conduc t eac hdesig nevaluatio no f a contro l devic e accordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.985(b)(1)(i) . (h ) Yo u ma yno t conduc t performanc e test s durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , a s specifie d i n§63.7(e)(1) .


# €< ?P.9 1

9 0 (i ) Yo u mus t conduc t eac hcontinuou s monitorin g syste m (CMS ) performanc e evaluatio n accordin g t o th e requirement s i n§63. 8 (e) . §63.236 6 Wha t ar e mymonitorin g installation , operation , an d maintenanc e requirements ? (a ) Yo u mus t install , operate , and maintai neac h continuou s paramete r monitorin g syste m(CPMS ) accordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.996 . I n addition , yo u mus t collec t
an d analyz e temperature , flow , pressure , o r p H dat a accordin g t o th e requirement s i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h (4 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) T o calculat e a vali d hourl yvalue , yo u mus t hav e a t leas t fou r equall yspace d dat a value s (or a t leas t two , i f tha t conditio ni s include d t o allo wfo r periodi c calibratio nchecks ) fo r tha t hou r fro ma CM S tha t i s no t ou t
o f contro l accordin g t o th e monitorin g pla n(e.g. , on e tha t incorporate s element s o f appendi xF , procedur e 1 o f 4 0 CF R par t 60 , appendi xF) . (2 ) T o calculat e th e averag e emission s fo r eac h averagin g period , yo u mus t hav e a t leas t 7 5 percen t o f th e hourl yaverage s fo r tha t perio d usin g onl ybloc k hourl y averag e value s tha t ar e base d o nvali d dat a (i.e. , no t fro m out-of-contro l periods) . (3 ) Determin e th e hourl yaverag e o f al l recorde d



## .^09 1

readings . (4 ) Recor d th e result s o f eac hinspection , calibration , an d validatio ncheck . (b ) Fo r eac htemperatur e monitorin g device , yo u mus t
mee t th e requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(8 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e temperatur e senso r i n a positio nthat ' provide s a representativ e temperature . (2 ) Fo r a noncryogeni c temperatur e range , us e a temperatur e senso r wit ha minimu mtoleranc e o f 2. 2 degree s Celsiu s o r 0.7 5 percen t o f th e temperatur e value , whicheve r i s greater . (3 ) Fo r a cryogeni c temperatur e range , us e a temperatur e senso r wit ha minimumtoleranc e o f 2. 2 degree s Celsiu s o r 2 percen t o f th e temperatur e value , whicheve r i s greater . (4 ) Shiel d th e temperatur e senso r syste mfro m electromagneti c interferenc e and chemica l contaminants . (5 ) I f a char t recorde r i s used , i t mus t hav e a sensitivit yi nth e mino r divisio n o f a t leas t 2 0 degree s Fahrenheit . (6 ) Perfor ma nelectroni c calibratio na t leas t semiannuall yaccordin g t o th e procedure s i nth e manufacturer' s owner' s manual . Followin g th e electroni c 

# -f .P.9 3

9 2 calibration , yo u mus t conduc t a temperatur e senso r validatio nchec k i nwhic ha secon d o r redundan t temperatur e
senso r place d nea r th e proces s temperatur e senso r mus t yiel d

a readin g withi n16. 7 degree s Celsiu s o f th e proces s temperatur e sensor' s reading . (7 ) Conduc t calibratio nan d validatio ncheck s an ytim e th e senso r exceed s th e manufacturer' s specifie d maximu m operatin g temperatur e range , o r instal l a ne wtemperatur e
sensor . (8 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t al l component s fo r integrit yan d al l electrica l connection s fo r continuity , oxidation , an d galvani c corrosion . (c ) Fo r eac hflo wmeasuremen t device , yo u mus t mee t th e requirement s i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e flo wsenso r an d othe r necessar y equipmen t suc ha s straightenin g vane s i na positio ntha t provide s a representativ e flow . (2 ) Us e a flo wsenso r wit ha minimu mtoleranc e o f 2 percen t o f th e flo wrate . (3 ) Reduc e swirlin g flo wo r abnorma l velocit y distribution s du e t o upstrea man d downstrea mdisturbances . (4 ) Conduc t a flo wsenso r calibratio nchec k a t leas t semiannually .

^1 9 3 (5 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t al l component s fo r integrity , al l electrica l connection s fo r continuity , and al l mechanica l connection s fo r leakage . (d ) Fo r eac hpressur e measuremen t device , yo u mus t

mee t th e requirement s i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (d)(1 ) throug h(7 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e pressur e sensor(s ) i na positio ntha t provide s a representativ e measuremen t o f th e pressure . (2 ) Minimiz e o r eliminat e pulsatin g pressure , vibration , an d interna l an d externa l corrosion . (3 ) Us e a gaug e wit ha minimu mtoleranc e o f 0. 5 inc h

o f wate r o r a transduce r wit ha minimu mtoleranc e o f 1 . percen t o f th e pressur e range . (4 ) Chec k fo r pressur e ta p pluggag e daily . (5 ) Usin g a manometer , chec k gaug e calibratio n quarterl yan d transduce r calibratio nmonthly . (6 ) Conduc t calibratio ncheck s an ytim e th e senso r exceed s th e manufacturer' s specifie d maximu moperatin g pressur e range , o r instal l a ne wpressur e sensor . (7 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t al l component s fo r integrity , al l electrica l connection s fo r continuity , an d al l mechanica l connection s fo r leakage . (e ) Fo r eac hp H measuremen t device , yo u mus t mee t th e requirement s i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s 

# 7 39 4 (e)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e p H senso r i n a positio ntha t provide s a representativ e measuremen t o f pH . (2 ) Ensur e tha t th e sampl e i s properl ymixe d an d representativ e o f th e flui d t o b e measured . (3 ) Chec k th e p H meter' s calibratio no na t leas t tw o point s ever y8 hour s o f proces s operation . (4 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t al l component s fo r integrit yand al l electrica l connection s fo r continuity . §63.237 0 Ho wd o I demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimitation s and wor k practic e standards ? (a ) Yo u mus t demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit heac h emissio nlimi t and wor k practic e standar d tha t applie s t o yo u accordin g t o Table s 6 and 7 o f thi s subpart . (b ) Yo u mus t establis heac hsite-specifi c operatin g limi t i nTabl e 3 o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o yo u accordin g t o th e requirement s i n§63.236 2 an d Tabl e 5 o f thi s subpart . (c ) Yo u mus t submi t th e Notificatio n o f Complianc e Statu s containin g th e result s o f th e initia l complianc e demonstratio naccordin g t o th e requirement s i n§63.2382(e) .

CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E REQUIREMENT S §63.237 4 Ho wd o I monito r and collec t dat a t o demonstrat e continuou s compliance ? 

# 44P.9 6

9 5 (a ) Yo u mus t monito r and collec t dat a accordin g t o thi s section . (b ) Excep t fo r monito r malfunctions , associate d repairs , and require d qualit yassuranc e o r contro l activitie s (including , a s applicable , calibratio ncheck s an d require d zer o and spa nadjustments) , yo u mus t monito r continuousl y(or collec t dat a a t al l require d intervals ) a t al l time s tha t th e affecte d sourc e i s operating . (c ) Yo u ma yno t us e dat a recorde d durin g monitorin g malfunctions , associate d repairs , o r require d qualit y assuranc e o r contro l activitie s i n dat a average s an d calculation s use d t o repor t emissio no r operatin g levels , no r ma ysuc hdat a b e use d i nfulfillin g a minimu mdat a availabilit yrequirement , i f applicable . Yo u mus t us e al l
o f th e dat a collecte d durin g al l othe r period s i nassessin g th e operatio no f th e contro l devic e and associate d contro l system . §63.237 8 Ho wd o I demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit h th e emissio nlimitation s and wor k practic e standards ? (a ) Yo u mus t demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit h
eac hemissio nlimitatio nand wor k practic e standar d i n Table s 2 throug h4 o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o yo u accordin g t o th e method s specifie d i nTable s 8 , 9 , an d 1 0 o f thi s subpart .



# 7S -9 6 (b ) Yo u mus t repor t eac hinstanc e i n whic hyo u di d no t

mee t an yemissio nlimi t o r operatin g limi t i n Table s 8 an d 9

o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . Thi s include s period s
o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunction . Yo u mus t als o repor t

eac hinstanc e i n whic hyo u di d no t mee t th e requirement s i n Tabl e 1 0 o f thi s subpar t tha t appl yt o you . Thes e instance s ar e deviation s fro mth e emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standard s i n thi s subpart . Thes e deviation s mus t b e reporte d accordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.2386 . (c ) Durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , yo u mus t operat e i n accordanc e wit hyou r SSMP . (d ) Consisten t wit h§§63.6(e ) an d 63.7(e)(1) , deviation s tha t occu r durin g a perio d o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio nar e no t violation s i f yo u mak e a n adequat e demonstratio ntha t yo u wer e operatin g i n accordanc e wit hth e SSMP . W e wil l determin e whethe r deviation s tha t occu r durin g a perio d o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio nar e violation s accordin g t o th e provision s i n §63.6(e) .

NOTIFICATIONS , REPORTS , AN DRECORD S §63.238 2 Wha t notification s mus t I submi t an d when ? (a ) Yo u mus t submi t al l o f th e notification s i n §§63.7(b ) an d (c) , 63.8(e) , (f)(4 ) an d (6) , an d 63.9(b ) . throug h(h ) tha t appl yt o you . (b ) A s specifie d i n §63.9(b)(2) , i f yo u startu p you r 

# 4&9 7

affecte d sourc e befor e th e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t submi t a nInitia l Notificatio nn o late r tha n12 0 calenda r day s afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart . (c ) A s specifie d i n §63.9(b)(3) , i f yo u startu p you r ne wo r reconstructe d affecte d sourc e o no r afte r th e effectiv e date , yo u mus t submi t a n Initia l Notificatio nn o late r tha n12 0 day s afte r initia l startup . (d ) I f yo u ar e require d t o conduc t a performanc e test , yo u mus t submi t a notificatio n o f inten t t o conduc t th e tes t
a t leas t 6 0 calenda r day s befor e i t i s schedule d t o begi n a s require d i n§63.7(b)(1) . (e ) I f yo u ar e require d t o conduc t a performanc e tes t
o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstratio na s specifie d i n Tabl e 5 , 6 , o r 7 o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t submi t a Notificatio no f Complianc e Statu s accordin g t o §63.9(h)(2)(ii) . (1 ) Fo r eac hinitia l complianc e demonstratio nrequire d i nTabl e 5 , 6 , o r 7 o f thi s subpar t tha t doe s no t includ e a performanc e test , yo u mus t submi t th e Notificatio no f Complianc e Statu s befor e th e clos e o f busines s o nth e 30t h calenda r da yfollowin g th e completio no f th e initia l complianc e demonstration . (2 ) Fo r eac hinitia l complianc e demonstratio nrequire d i nTabl e 5 , 6 , o r 7 o f thi s subpar t tha t include s a 

# 4 7P.9 9

9 8 performanc e tes t conducte d accordin g t o th e requirement s i n Tabl e 5 o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t submi t th e Notificatio no f Complianc e Status , includin g th e performanc e tes t results , befor e th e clos e o f busines s o nth e 60t hcalenda r da y followin g th e completio no f th e performanc e tes t accordin g t o §63.10(d)(2) . §63.238 6 Wha t report s mus t I submi t an d when ? (a ) Yo u mus t submi t eac hrepor t i nTabl e 1 1 o f thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Unles s th e Administrato r ha s approve d a differen t schedul e fo r submissio no f report s unde r §63.1 0 (a) , yo u mus t submi t eac hrepor t b yth e dat e i nTabl e 1 1 o f thi s subpar t

an d accordin g t o th e requirement s i nparagraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Th e firs t complianc e repor t mus t cove r th e perio d beginnin g o nth e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie d fo r you r affecte d sourc e i n§63.234 2 an d endin g o nJun e 3 0 o r Decembe r 31 , whicheve r dat e i s th e firs t dat e followin g th e
en d o f th e firs t calenda r hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie d fo r you r sourc e i n§63.2342 . (2 ) Th e firs t complianc e repor t mus t b e postmarke d n o late r tha nJul y3 1 o r Januar y31 , whicheve r dat e follow s th e
en d o f th e firs t calenda r hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie d fo r you r affecte d sourc e i n§63.2342 .

^P. 1

9 9 (3 ) Eac hsubsequen t complianc e repor t mus t cove r th e semiannua l reportin g perio d fro mJanuar y1 throug hJun e 3 0
o r th e semiannua l reportin g perio d fro mJul y1 throug h Decembe r 31 . (4 ) Eac hsubsequen t complianc e repor t mus t b e postmarke d n o late r tha n Jul y3 1 o r Januar y31 , whicheve r dat e i s th e firs t dat e followin g th e en d o f th e semiannua l reportin g period . (5 ) Fo r eac haffecte d sourc e tha t i s subjec t t o permittin g regulation s pursuan t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t 7 0 o r 71 , i f th e permittin g authorit yha s establishe d date s fo r submittin g semiannua l report s pursuan t t o 4 0 CF R 70.6(3 ) (iii ) (A ) o r 71. 6 (3 ) (iii ) (A) , yo u ma ysubmi t th e firs t
an d subsequen t complianc e report s accordin g t o th e date s th e permittin g authorit yha s establishe d instea d o f accordin g t o th e date s i nparagraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section . (c ) Th e complianc e repor t mus t contai nth e informatio n i nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(7 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Compan ynam e and address. . (2 ) Statemen t bya responsibl e official , includin g th e official' s name , title , and signature , certifyin g that , base d o ninformatio n and belie f forme d afte r reasonabl e inquiry , th e statement s and informatio ni nth e repor t ar e true , accurate , an d complete .



## <?< ?P. 2

10 0 (3 ) Dat e o f repor t an d beginnin g an d endin g date s o f th e reportin g period . (4 ) An ychange s t o th e informatio nliste d i nparagrap h (d ) o f thi s sectio n tha t hav e occurre d sinc e th e las t report . (5 ) I f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n durin g th e reportin g perio d an d yo u too k action s consisten t wit hyou r SSMP , th e complianc e repor t mus t includ e th e informatio ndescribe d i n§63.10(d)(5)(i) . (6 ) I f ther e ar e n o deviation s fro man yemissio n limitatio n(emissio nlimi t o r operatin g limit ) tha t applie s t o yo u an d ther e ar e n o deviation s fro mth e requirement s fo r
wor k practic e standard s i nTabl e 1 0 o f thi s subpart , a statemen t tha t ther e wer e n o deviation s fro mth e emissio n limitation s o r wor k practic e standard s durin g th e reportin g period . (7 ) I f ther e wer e n o period s durin g whic hth e CM S wa s
ou t o f contro l a s specifie d i n§63.8(c)(7) , a statemen t tha t ther e wer e n o period s durin g whic hth e CM S wa s ou t o f contro l durin g th e reportin g period . (d ) Th e firs t complianc e repor t mus t contai nth e informatio ni nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(7 ) o f thi s sectio n
an d als o th e informatio ni nparagraph s (d)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f thi s section :



## /OOP. 3

10 1 (1 ) Alistin g o f th e organi c liquid s store d o r transferre d a t th e facilit ydurin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g fo r eac hliqui d th e informatio ni nparagraph s (d)(1)(i ) throug h(iv ) o f thi s section : (i ) Liqui d name ; (ii ) Tota l weigh t percentag e o f th e organi c HA P i n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpart ; (iii ) Annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressure ; an d (iv ) Tota l throughpu t int o an d ou t o f th e facility . (2 ) A ninventor yo f al l storag e tank s a t th e facilit y tha t store d organi c liquid s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g fo r eac htan k th e informatio ni nparagraph s (d)(2)(i ) throug h(iv ) o f thi s section : (i ) Tan k I D cod e an d capacity ; (ii ) Tan k roo f configuration , ri msea l type(s) , an d descriptio no f floatin g dec k fittings , a s applicable ; (iii ) Nam e o f organi c liquid(s ) store d i nth e tank ;

an d (iv ) Contro l devic e i nus e fo r eac hfixed-roo f tank , wher e applicable . (3 ) Alistin g o f al l transfe r rac k loadin g position s tha t transferre d organi c liquid s int o carg o tank s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g fo r eac hloadin g positio nth e informatio ni nparagraph s (d)(3)(i ) throug h(iii ) o f thi s 

# /olP. 4

10 2 section : (i ) I D code ; (ii ) Organi c liquid s name(s ) an d throughput(s) ; an d (iii ) Contro l devic e i nus e a t eac hposition , wher e applicable . (4 ) Alistin g o f al l carg o tank s (tan k truck s an d railcars ) tha t loade d organi c liquid s a t affecte d transfe r
rac k loadin g position s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g th e typ e o f carg o tank , owner , I D number , an d dat e
an d tes t metho d fo r th e mos t recen t vapo r tightnes s test . (5 ) Alistin g o f al l equipmen t i norgani c liquid s servic e durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g fo r eac h componen t th e informatio ni nparagraph s (d)(5)(i ) throug h (iv ) o f thi s section : (i ) I D code ; (ii ) Facilit ypla ndrawin g showin g th e equipmen t location ; (iii ) A nestimat e o f th e numbe r o f hour s tha t th e componen t operate d i norgani c liquid s servic e durin g th e reportin g period ; an d (iv ) Metho d o f complianc e wit hth e standar d (e.g. , "lea k detectio nan d repai r monitoring " o r "equippe d wit h dua l mechanica l seals") , i f applicable . (e ) Fo r eac hdeviatio nfro ma nemissio nlimitatio n



## /£>£ .P. 5

10 3 (emissio nlimi t o r operatin g limit ) occurrin g a t a naffecte d
sourc e wher e yo u ar e usin g a CM S t o compl ywit ha nemissio n limitatio n i nthi s subpart , yo u mus t includ e th e informatio n i nparagraph s (c ) (1 ) throug h(4 ) and paragraph s (e ) (1 ) throug h(12 ) o f thi s section . Thi s include s period s o f startup, 5 shutdown , o r malfunction . (1 ) Th e dat e and tim e tha t eac hmalfunctio nstarte d
an d stopped . (2 ) Th e dat e and tim e tha t eac hCM S wa s inoperative , excep t fo r zer o (low-level ) and high-leve l checks' . (3 ) Th e date , time , and duratio ntha t eac hCM S wa s ou t
o f control , includin g th e informatio ni n§63.8(c)(8) . (4 ) Th e dat e and tim e tha t eac hdeviatio nstarte d an d stopped , an d whethe r eac hdeviatio n occurre d durin g a perio d
o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , o r durin g anothe r period . (5 ) Asummar yo f th e tota l duratio no f th e deviation s durin g th e reportin g perio d an d th e tota l duratio na s a percentag e o f th e tota l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t reportin g period . (6 ) Abreakdow no f th e tota l duratio no f th e deviation s durin g th e reportin g perio d int o thos e tha t ar e du e t o startup , shutdown , contro l equipmen t problems , proces s problems , othe r knowncauses , an d othe r unknow n 

# /o^P. 6

10 4

causes , (7 ) Asummar yo f th e tota l duratio no f CM S downtim e durin g th e reportin g perio d an d th e tota l duratio no f CM S downtim e a s a percentag e o f th e tota l sourc e operatin g time

durin g tha t reportin g period . (8 ) A nidentificatio n o f eac hHA P tha t wa s potentiall y emitte d durin g th e deviation . (9 ) Abrie f descriptio no f th e proces s a t whic hth e CM S deviatio noccurred . (10 ) Abrie f descriptio no f th e CMS . (11 ) Th e dat e o f th e lates t CM S certificatio n o r audit . (12 ) Adescriptio no f an ychange s i nCMS , processes , o r control s sinc e th e las t reportin g period . (f ) Eac haffecte d sourc e tha t ha s obtaine d a titl e V operatin g permi t pursuan t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t 7 0 o r 7 1 mus t repor t al l deviation s a s define d i nthi s subpar t i nth e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require d b y4 0 CF R 70.6(a ) (3 ) (iii ) (A ) o r 71.6(a ) (3 ) (iii ) (A ) . I f a naffecte d

sourc e submit s a complianc e repor t pursuan t t o Tabl e 1 1 o f thi s subpar t alon g with , o r a s par t of , th e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require d b y4 0 CF R70.6(a ) (3 ) (iii ) (A ) o r 71.6(a ) (3 ) (iii ) (A) , an d th e complianc e repor t include s al l require d informatio nconcernin g deviation s fro man yemissio n


# /oHP. 7

10 5 limitatio n(includin g anyoperatin g limi t o r wor k practic e standard ) requiremen t i n thi s subpart , w e wil l conside r submissio no f th e complianc e repor t a s satisfyin g any obligatio nt o repor t th e sam e deviation s i nth e semiannua l monitorin g report . However , submissio no f a complianc e repor t wil l no t otherwis e affec t anyobligatio nth e affecte d
sourc e ma yhav e t o repor t deviation s fro mpermi t requirement s t o th e permittin g authority . §63.239 0 Wha t record s mus t I keep ? (a ) Yo u mus t kee p record s a s describe d i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(3 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Acop yo f eac hnotificatio n and repor t tha t yo u submitte d t o compl ywit hthi s subpart , includin g al l documentatio nsupportin g an yInitia l Notificatio no r Notificatio no f Complianc e Statu s tha t yo u submitted , accordin g t o th e requirement s i n§63.10(b)(1 ) and (2)(xiv) . (2 ) Th e record s i n §§63.6(e)(3)(iii ) throug h(v ) an d 63.10(b)(2)(i)(v ) relate d t o startups , shutdowns , an d malfunctions . (3 ) Result s o f performanc e tests . (b ) Fo r eac hCMS , yo u mus t kee p record s a s describe d i nparagraph s (b)(1 ) and (2 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Record s describe d i n §63.10(b)(2)(vi ) throug h(xi ) tha t appl yt o you r CMS .

/ ( &P. 8

10 6 (2 ) Performanc e evaluatio n plans , includin g previou s (i.e. , superseded ) version s o f th e pla n a s require d i n §63.8(d)(3) . (c ) Yo u mus t kee p th e record s require d i n Table s 8 , 9 , an d 1 0 o f thi s subpar t t o sho wcontinuou s complianc e wit h

eac hemissio n limitatio n an d wor k practic e standar d tha t applie s t o you . §63.239 4 I n wha t forman d ho wlon g mus t I kee p myrecords ? (a ) You r record s mus t b e i n a for msuitabl e an d readil yavailabl e fo r expeditiou s inspectio nan d revie w accordin g t o §63.10(b)(1) . (b ) A s specifie d i n §63.10(b)(1) , yo u mus t kee p you r file s o f al l informatio n(includin g al l report s an d notifications ) fo r a t leas t 5 year s followin g th e dat e o f

eac hoccurrence , measurement , maintenance , correctiv e action , report , o r record . (c ) Yo u mus t kee p eac hrecor d o n sit e fo r a t leas t 2 year s afte r th e dat e o f eac hoccurrence , measurement , maintenance , correctiv e action , report , o r record , accordin g t o §63.10(b)(1) . Yo u ma ykee p th e record s offsit e fo r th e remainin g 3 years .

OTHE RREQUIREMENT S AN D INFORMATIO N §63.239 8 Wha t part s o f th e Genera l Provision s appl yt o me ? Tabl e 1 2 o f thi s subpar t show s whic hpart s o f th e


# /O0P. 9

10 7 Genera l Provision s i n §§63. 1 throug h63.1 5 appl yt o you . §63.240 2 Wh o implement s and enforce s thi s subpart ? (a ) Thi s subpar t ca nb e implemente d an d enforce d by th e EP Ao r a delegate d authorit ysuc ha s you r State , local , o r triba l agency . I f th e EP AAdministrato r ha s delegate d authorit yt o you r State , local , o r triba l agency , the ntha t agency , a s wel l a s th e EPA , ha s th e authorit yt o implemen t
an d enforc e thi s subpart . Yo u shoul d contac t you r EP A Regiona l Offic e (se e lis t i n §63.13 ) t o fin d ou t i f thi s subpar t i s delegate d t o you r State , local , o r triba l agency . (b ) I ndelegatin g implementatio n and enforcemen t authorit yfo r thi s subpar t t o a State , local , o r triba l agenc yunde r subpar t E o f thi s part , th e authoritie s containe d i nparagrap h(c ) o f thi s sectio nar e retaine d by th e Administrato r o f th e EP Aand ar e no t delegate d t o th e State , local , o r triba l agency . (c ) Th e authoritie s tha t wil l no t b e delegate d t o State , local , o r triba l agencie s ar e describe d i nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Approva l o f alternative s t o th e nonopacit y emissio nlimitation s and wor k practic e standard s i n §63.2346(a ) throug h(c ) unde r §63.6(g) . (2 ) Approva l o f majo r alternative s t o tes t method s unde r §63.7(e)(2)(ii ) and (f ) and a s define d i n§63.90 . 

# /__ ?P.1 0

10 8 (3 ) Approva l o f majo r alternative s t o monitorin g unde r §63.8(f ) an d a s define d i n§63.90 . (4 ) Approva l o f majo r alternative s t o recordkeepin g
an d reportin g unde r §63.10(f ) an d a s define d i n§63.90 . §63.240 6 Wha t definition s appl yt o thi s subpart ? Term s use d i nthi s subpar t ar e define d i nth e CAA , i n §63.2 , an d i nthi s section . I f th e sam e ter mi s define d i n anothe r subpar t an d i nthi s section , i t wil l hav e th e meanin g give ni nthi s sectio nfo r purpose s o f thi s subpart . Annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressure , a s use d i nthi s subpart , mean s th e tota l vapo r pressur e exerte d b ya store d

o r transferre d organi c liqui d a t th e temperatur e equa l t o th e annua l averag e o f th e loca l (nearest ) averag e monthl y temperature s reporte d b yth e Nationa l Weathe r Service . Thi s temperatur e i s th e arithmeti c averag e o f th e 1 2 monthl y averag e temperature s fo r eac hcalenda r yea r a t eac haffecte d

sourc e an d i s recalculate d a t th e en d o f eac hyear . Th e vapo r pressur e valu e i s determined : (1 ) I n accordanc e wit hmethod s describe d i nAmerica n Petroleu mInstitut e Publicatio n2517 , Evaporativ e Los s fro m Externa l Floating-Roo f Tank s (incorporate d b yreferenc e a s specifie d i n§63.14) ; (2 ) Usin g standar d referenc e texts ; (3 ) B yth e America nSociet yfo r Testin g an d Material s



# /OSP.1 1

10 9 Metho d D2879-8 3 (incorporate d byreferenc e a s specifie d i n §63.14) ; o r (4 ) Usin g anyothe r metho d tha t th e EP Aapproves . AP I gravit ymean s th e weigh t pe r uni t volum e o f hydrocarbo nliquid s a s measure d bya syste mrecommende d by th e America nPetroleumInstitut e (API ) and i s expresse d i n degrees . Blac k oi l mean s hydrocarbo n(petroleum ) liqui d wit ha gas-to-oi l rati o les s tha n0.3 1 cubi c meter s pe r lite r (41. 4 cubi c fee t pe r gallon ) an d a n AP I gravit yles s tha n4 0 degrees , measure d a t th e poin t o f entr yt o th e distributio n system . Capacit ymean s th e volum e o f liqui d tha t i s capabl e o f bein g store d i na storag e tank , determine d bymultiplyin g th e tank' s interna l cross-sectiona l are a byth e interna l heigh t o f th e shell . Carg o tan k mean s a tan k truc k o r railca r int o whic h organi c liquid s ar e loade d a t a nOL D operatio ntransfe r rack . Close d ven t syste mmean s a syste mtha t i s no t ope nt o th e atmospher e and i s compose d o f piping , ductwork , connections , and , i f necessary , flow-inducin g device s tha t transpor t ga s o r vapor s fro ma nemissio npoin t t o a contro l device . Thi s syste mdoe s no t includ e th e vapo r collectio n 

# / G

# 1P.1 2



### 11 0 systemtha t i s par t o f som e tan k truck s an

d railcar s o r the loading ar

m o r hos e tha t i s used fo r vapo r return . Fo r transfe r racks , the close d ven t systembegin s at , an d includes , the firs t bloc k valve on the downstrea msid e o f the loading ar

mo r hos e used t o conveydisplace d vapors . Combustio ndevic e mean s an individua l uni t o f equipment , sucha s a flare , incinerator , proces s heater , o r boiler , use d fo r the combustio n o f organi c emissions . Contro l device , a s used i nthi s subpart , mean s an y combustio ndevice , recover ydevice , recaptur e device , o r an y combinatio n o f thes e device s use d t o compl ywit hthi s subpart . Suchequipmen t o r device s include , bu t ar e no t limite d to , absorbers , adsorbers , condensers , incinerators , flares , boilers , an d proces s heaters . Primarycondensers , stea mstrippers , o r fue l ga s systems ar e no t considere d contro l devices . Crud e oil , a s use d i n thi s subpart , mean s an yo f the naturall yoccurring liquid s commonl yreferre d t o a s crud e oil , othe r thanblac k oil , regardles s o f specifi c physica l properties . Crud e oi l pipelin e breakou t statio nplan t sit e mean s a facilit yalong a pipelin e containing storag e tank s an d equipmen t use d t o temporaril ystor e crud e oi l fro mthe pipeline . Breakou t station s mayals o contai nbooste r pump s 

# //oP.1 3

11 1
use d t o mov e th e crud e oi l alon g th e pipeline . Thes e facilitie s ar e downstrea mo f th e poin t o f custodytransfer . Crud e oi l pipelin e pumpin g statio n plan t sit e mean s a facilit yalon g a pipelin e containin g equipmen t (i.e. , booste r pumps , etc. ) use d t o sustai nth e movemen t o f crud e oi l throug hth e pipeline . Pumpin g station s ma yals o contai n crud e oi l breakou t storag e tanks . Thes e facilitie s ar e downstrea m

o f th e poin t o f custodytransfer . Custod ytransfe r mean s th e transfe r o f hydrocarbo n liquids , afte r processin g and/o r treatmen t i nth e producin g operations , fro m

storag e tank s o r automati c transfe r facilitie s t o pipeline s o r anyothe r form s o f transportation . Desig nevaluatio nmean s a procedur e fo r evaluatin g contro l device s tha t complie s wit hth e requirement s i n §63.985(b)(1)(i) . Deviatio nmean s anyinstanc e i n whic ha naffecte d
sourc e subjec t t o thi s subpart , o r a nowne r o r operato r o f
suc ha source : (1 ) Fail s t o mee t anyrequiremen t o r obligatio n establishe d bythi s subpart , includin g bu t no t limite d t o an yemissio nlimitatio n(includin g anyoperatin g limit ) o r wor k practic e standard ; (2 ) Fail s t o mee t anyter mo r conditio ntha t i s

/ / /P.1 4



### 11 2 adopte d t o implemen t anapplicabl e requiremen t i nthi s subpart , an

d tha t i s include d i n the operating permi t fo r an yaffecte d sourc e require d t o obtai nsucha permit ; o r (3 ) Fail s t o mee t an yemissio n limitatio n(includin g an yoperating limit ) o r work practic e standard i nthi s subpar t during startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , regardles s o f whethe r o r no t suchfailur e i s permitte d b ythi s subpart . Emissio n limitationmean s an emissio nlimit , opacit y limit , operating limit , o r visibl e emissio n limit . Equipmen t mean s eachpump , valve , an d sampling connectio n systemused i n organi c liquid s servic e a t anOL D operation . Gasolin e mean s an

ypetroleu

mdistillat e o r petroleu m distillate/alcoho l blen d having a Rei d vapo r pressur e o f 27. 6 kilopascal s (4. 0 psia ) o r greate r whic hi s used a s a fue l fo r interna l combustio nengines . Aviatio ngasolin e i s include d i n thi s definition . Gas-to-oi l rati o mean s the numbe r o f standard cubi c meter s o f ga s produce d pe r lite r o f crud e oi l o r othe r hydrocarbo n liquid . I n organi c liquid s servic e mean s tha t a piec e o f equipmen t contain s o r contact s organi c liquid s having 5 percen t b

yweigh t o r greate r o f the organi c HAP liste d i n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpart .

/ / *P.1 5

11 3 Organi c liguid , a s use d i nthi s subpart , means : (1 ) Crud e oil ; o r (2 ) An yliqui d o r liqui d mixtur e tha t contain s a tota l
o f 5 percen t byweigh t o r mor e o f th e organi c HA P liste d i n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpart, , a s determine d usin g Metho d 1 8 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi xA , o r anyothe r metho d approve d byth e Administrator . An yfuel s consume d o r dispense d directl yt o user s o nth e plan t sit e and al l gasolin e ar e exclude d fro m th e definition . Organi c liguid s distributio n (OLD ) operatio nmean s th e activitie s and equipmen t use d t o transfe r organi c liquid s int o o r ou t o f a plan t site . I t als o include s storag e o f distribute d organi c liquid s o nth e site . Th e OL D operatio n ca nb e thos e activitie s performe d a t a dedicate d distributio nplan t site , o r i t ma yb e collocate d i na plan t sit e a t whic hmanufacturin g operation s ar e carrie d out . Permittin g authorit ymean s on e o f th e following : (1 ) Th e Stat e ai r pollutio ncontro l agency , loca l agency , o r othe r agenc yauthorize d byth e EP AAdministrato r t o carr you t a permi t progra munde r par t 7 0 o f thi s chapter ;
o r (2 ) Th e EP AAdministrator , i n th e cas e o f EPA
implemente d permi t program s unde r titl e V o f th e CA

A(4 2 U.S.C . 7661 ) and par t 7 1 o f thi s chapter . 

# H3P.1 6



### 11 4 Plan t site , a s used i nthi s subpart , mean s al l contiguou s o r adjoining propert ytha t i s unde r commo n control , including propertie s tha t ar e separate d onl yb ya road o r othe r publi c right-of-way . Commo ncontro l include s propertie s tha t ar e owned , leased , o r operate d b yth e same entity , paren t entity , subsidiary , o r an ycombination . Researc han

d developmen t facilit ymean s laboratoryan d pilo t plan t operation s whos e primarypurpos e i s t o conduc t researc han

d developmen t int o newprocesse s an d products , wher e the operation s ar e unde r the clos e supervisio n o f technicall ytraine d personnel , an d whic har e no t engage d i n the manufactur e o f product s fo r commercia l sale , excep t i na d e minimi s manner . Responsibl e officia l mean s responsibl e officia l a s define d i n4 0 CFR70.2 . Shutdow n mean s the cessation o f operatio no f a regulate d sourc e an d equipmen t require d o r used t o compl y wit hthi s subpart , o r the emptying an d degassing o f a storag e tank . Shutdow na s define d her e includes , bu t i s no t limite d to , event s tha t resul t fro mperiodi c maintenance , replacemen t o f equipment , o r repair . Storag e tank , a s used i n thi s subpart , mean s a stationaryuni t tha t i s constructe d primaril yo f nonearthe n material s (suc

ha s wood , concrete , steel , o r reinforce d 

# /(HP.1 7

11 5 plastic ) tha t provid e structura l suppor t an d i s designe d t o hol d a bul k quantit yo f liquid . Storag e tank s d o no t include : (1 ) Vessel s permanentl yattache d t o conveyance s suc h
a s trucks , railcars , barges , o r ships ; (2 ) Bottom s receive r tanks ; (3 ) Surg e contro l vessels ; (4 ) Vessel s storin g wastewater ; o r (5 ) Reacto r vessel s associate d wit ha manufacturin g proces s unit . Transfe r rac k mean s a singl e syste muse d t o loa d organi c liquid s int o bul k carg o tank s mounte d o no r i na truck , truc k trailer , o r railcar . I t include s al l loadin g arms , pumps , meters , shutof f valves , relie f valves , an d othe r pipin g an d equipmen t necessar yfo r th e transfe r operation . Transfe r equipmen t and operation s tha t ar e physicall yseparat e (i.e. , d o no t shar e commo npiping , valves , and othe r equipment ) ar e considere d t o b e separat e transfe r racks . Transfe r rac k loadin g positio nmean s a nindividua l tan k truc k o r railca r parkin g spo t a t a transfe r rack . A n affecte d loadin g positio ni s on e a t whic h11. 8 millio n liter s (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r mor e o f organi c liquid s ar e transferre d int o a combinatio no f tan k truck s


# /ISP.1 8



### 11 6 an d railcars . Vapor-tigh t carg o tan k mean s a carg o tan k liqui d deliverytank tha t ha s bee ndemonstrate d t o b e vapor-tight . T o b e considere d vapor-tight , a carg o tan k equippe d wit h vapo r collectio nequipmen t mus t underg o a pressur e chang e o f
n o mor e than 25 0 pascal s ( 1 incho f water ) withi n5 minute s afte r i t i s pressurize d t o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water) . Thi s capabilit ymus t b e demonstrate d annuall yusing th e procedure s specifie d i n Metho d 2 7 o f 4 0 CFRpar t 60 , appendi xA . Fo r al l othe r carg o tanks , vapo r tightnes s i s demonstrate d b

yperforming the U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n pressur e tes t procedure s fo r tan k car s an

d carg o tanks . Wor k practic e standard mean s an ydesign , equipment , wor k practice , o r operationa l standard , o r combinatio n thereof , tha t i s promulgate d pursuan t t o sectio n 112(h ) o f the CAA . Table s to Subpar t EEEE o f Par t 6 3



# J/irP.1 9

11 7

Tabl e 1 t o Subpar t EEEE—Organi c Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s A s state di n§63.2334(b) , yo umus t us e th e informatio nliste di nthe followin gtabl e t o determin e i f th e liquid s handle da t you r facilit y contai na t leas t 5 percen t b y

weigh t o f thes e HAP : CompoundName Acetaldehyd e Acetonitril e Acrolei n Acryli c aci d Acrylonitril e Ally l chlorid e Benzen e Bi s (chloromethyl ) ethe r Bromofor m Butadien e (1,3- ) Carbo ndisulfid e Carbo ntetrachlorid e Chlorobenzen e 2-Chloro-l,3-butadien e Chlorofor m Cumen e Dichloroethan e (1,2- ) (EDC ) (Chl o

(Ethy l Dichloroethylethe r (Bis(2

- chloroethyl)ether ) Dichloropropen e (1,3- ) Diethylen e glyco l monobuty l Diethylen e glyco l monomethy l roprene )

en e dichloride )

ethe r ethe r CAS Number 3

75-07- 0 75-05- 8 107-02- 8 79-10- 7 107-13- 1 107-05- 1 71-43- 2 542-88- 1 75-25- 2 106-99- 0 75-15- 0 56-23- 5 108-90- 7 126-99- 8 67-66- 3 98-82- 8 107-06- 2 111-44- 4 542-75- 6 112-34- 5 111-77- 3 

# inP.2 0



### 11 8 Dimethylhydrazin e (1,1- ) Dioxan e (1,4- ) (1,4-Diethyleneoxide ) Epichlorohydri n (l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane ) Epoxybutan e (1,2- ) Ethy l acrylat e Ethylbenzen e Ethy l chlorid e (Chloroethane ) Ethylen e dibromid e (Dibromomethane ) Ethylen e glyco l dimethy l ethe r Ethylen e glyco l monomethy l ethe r Ethylen e glyco l monomethy l ethe r acetat e Ethylen e glyco l monopheny l ethe r Ethylen e oxid e Ethyliden e dichlorid e (1,1-Dichloroethane ) Formaldehyd e Hexan e Hydrazin e Methano l Methy l bromid e (Bromomethane ) Methy l chlorid e (Chloromethane ) Methylen e chlorid e (Dichloromethane ) Methy l ethy l keton e (2-Butanone ) (MEK ) Methy l hydrazin e Methy l isobuty l ketone (Hexone ) (MIBK ) Methy l isocyanat e Methy l methacrylat e Methy l tert-buty l ethe r (MTBE ) Nitropropan e (2- ) 57-14- 7 123-91- 1 106-89- 8 106-88- 7 140-88- 5 100-41- 4 75-00- 3 106-93- 4 110-71- 4 109-86- 4 110-49- 6 122-99- 6 75-21- 8 75-34- 3 50-00- 0 110-54- 3 302-01- 2 67-56- 1 74-83- 9 74-87- 3 75-09- 2 78-93- 3 60-34- 4 108-10- 1 624-83- 9 80-62- 6 1634-04- 4 79-46- 9



# //€P.2 1

11 9 

### Phosgen e Propionaldehyd e Propylen e dichlorid e (1,2-Dichloropropane ) Propylen e oxid e Styren e Tetrachloroethan e (1,1,2,2- ) Tetrachloroethylen e (Perchloroethylene ) Toluen e Trichloroethan e (1,1,1- ) (Methyl chloroform ) Trichloroethan e (1,1,2- ) (Vinyl trichloride ) Trichloroethylen e Triethylamin e Trimethylpentan e (2,2,4- ) Viny l acetat e Viny l chlorid e (Chloroethylene ) Vinyliden e chlorid e (1,1-Dichloroethylene ) Xylen e (m- ) Xylen e (o- ) Xylen e (p- ) Xylene s (isomer s an d mixtures ) 75-44- 5 123-38- 6 78-87- 5 75-56- 9 100-42- 5 79-34- 5 127-18- 4 108-88- 3 71-55- 6 79-00- 5 79-01- 6 121-44- 8 540-84- 1 108-05- 4 75-01- 4 75-35- 4 108-38- 3 95-47- 6 106-42- 3 1330-20- 7

a CA S number s refe r t o th e Chemica l Abstract s Service s registr ynumbe r assigne d t o specifi c compounds , isomers , o r mixture s o f compounds .

Tabl e 2 t o Subpar t EEEE—Emissio nLimit s A s state di n§§63.2338(b)(2 ) and63.2346(a) , yo umus t 

# // ?P.2 2



### 12 0 comply withth

e emissio

nlimit s for organi c liqui d distributio

naffecte

dsource s inth

e followin

gtable : I f yo uow nor operate.. . An dif . The nyoumust . (1 ) a storag e tan

k a t an existing affecte d sourc e wit ha capacit y >7 5 cubi c meter s (20,00 0 gallons ) an d <15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons) . the annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressur e o f the store d organi c liqui d i s 2:13. 1 kilopascal s (1. 9 psia ) an

d <76. 6 kilopascal s (11. 1 psia) . (a ) reduc e

emission s o f tota l organi c HAP o r TO C b y9 5 weight

percen t (or , fo r combustio n devices , t o an exhaus t concentratio n o f 2 0 parts , pe r millio n b

yvolume , on a dr ybasis , correcte d t o 3 % oxygen ) b

yventing emission s through a close d ven t systemt o an

y combinatio n o f contro l device s meeting the requirement s o f subpar t S S o f thi s part , a s specifie d i n §§63.982(a)(1 ) an d (f) , 63.983 , 63.984 , 63.985 , 63.987 , 63.988 , 63.990 , an

d 63.99 5 o f thi s part ; o r (b ) compl ywit h the wor k practic e standard s specifie d i n Tabl e 4 , item1 o f thi s subpart .



# /?o12 1 P.2 3

(2 ) a storag e tan k a t a nexistin g affecte d sourc e wit ha capacit y >15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons) . th e annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressur e o f th e store d organi c liqui d i s _:5. 2 kilopascal s (0.7 5 psia) . sam e a s ite m1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart .

(3 ) a storag e tan k a t a ne waffecte d sourc e wit ha capacit y>3 8 cubi c meter s (10,00 0 gallons ) an d <15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons) . th e annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressur e o f th e store d organi c liqui d i s _:13. 1 kilopascal s (1. 9 psia ) and <76. 6 kilopascal s (11. 1 psia) . sam e a s ite m1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart .

(4 ) a storag e tan k a t a ne waffecte d sourc e wit ha capacit y>15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons) . th e annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressur e o f th e store d organi c liqui d i s >0. 7 kilopascal s (0. 1 psia) . sam e a s ite m1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart .



# /? /P.2 4



### 12 2 (5 ) a transfe r the transfe r rac k rack . load s a t an y loading positio n 2:11. 8 millio n liter s (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o f organi c liquid s int o a combinatio n o f tan k truck s an

d railcars . (a ) reduc e emission s o f tota l organi c HAP o r TO C a t eachaffecte d loading positio n b y9 5 weight

percen t (or , fo r combustio n devices , t o an exhaus t concentratio nles s than o r equa l t o 2 0 part s pe r millio n b

yvolume , on a drybasis , correcte d t o 3 % oxygen ) b

yventing emission s through a close d ven t systemt o an

y combinatio n o f contro l device s meeting the requirement s o f subpar t S S o f thi s part , a s specifie d i n §§63.982(a ) (3 ) (ii ) an d (f) , 63.983 , 63.984 , 63.987 , 63.988 , 63.990 , 63.995 , an

d 63.99 7 o f thi s part ; an

d (b ) compl ywit h the wor k practic e standard s specifie d i nTabl e 4 , item2 o f thi s subpart .



# /P2 -P.2 5

12 3

Tabl e 3 t o Subpar t EEEE--Operatin gLimit s A s state di n§§63.2346(b ) an d63.2370(b) , yo umus t compl y wit hthe operatin glimit s for organi c liqui d distributio naffecte dsource s i nthe followingtable : For.. . Youmust. . . (1 ) eac hexistin g and eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a thermal.oxidize r t o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart .
(2 ) eac hexistin g and eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a catalyti c oxidize r t o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . maintai n th e hourl yaverag e firebo xtemperatur e greate r tha no r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio no r performanc e test . (A ) replac e th e existin g catalys t be d wit ha be d tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; and (B ) maintai nth e hourl y averag e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate r tha no r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test ; and (C ) maintai nth e hourl y averag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e minimu m temperatur e differenc e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test . 

# /s&

### 12 4 P.2 6



### (3 ) eachexisting an d each newaffecte d sourc e using a condense r t o compl ywit ha n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . maintai n the hourl yaverag e condense r exi t temperatur e les s thano r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d during the designevaluatio no r performanc e test . (4 ) eac hexisting an d each newaffecte d sourc e using an adsorptio n systemwit h adsorben t regeneratio nt o compl ywit hanemissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . (A ) replac e the existing adsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f the bed wit ha

n adsorben t tha t meet s the replacemen t specification s establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e the ag e o f the adsorben t exceed s th e maximu

m allowabl e ag e establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (B ) maintai n the frequency• o f regeneratio ngreate r than o r equa l t o the referenc e frequencyestablishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (C ) maintai nthe tota l regeneratio nstrea

mmas s flo wduring the adsorptio n be d regeneratio ncycl e greate r than o r equa l t o the referenc e strea

mmas s flow establishe d during the designevaluatio no r performanc e test ; an d (D ) maintai nthe temperatur e o f the adsorptio nbe d during regeneratio n(excep t during the cooling cycle ) greate r than o r equa l t o the referenc e temperatur e establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d



# 19-1

### (5 ) eac hexisting an d each newaffecte d sourc e using adsorptio n systemwithou t adsorben t regeneratio nt o compl ywit ha

n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . 12 5(E ) maintai n the temperatur e o f the adsorptio n be d afte r regeneratio n (an

d withi n1 5 minute s afte r completing an y cooling cycle ) les s thano r equa l t o the referenc e temperatur e establishe d during the designevaluatio n o r performanc e test . (A ) replac e the existing a nadsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f the be d wit ha

n adsorben t tha t meet s the replacemen t specification s establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e the ag e o f the adsorben t exceed s th e maximu

m allowabl e ag e establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (B ) maintai nthe temperatur e o f the adsorptio n be d les s thano r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d during the design evaluatio n o r performanc e test . (6 ) eac hexisting an d each newaffecte d sourc e using a flar e t o compl ywit ha n emissio n limi t i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . (A ) compl ywit hthe equipmen t an

d operating requirement s i n §63.987(a ) o f subpar t S S o f thi s part ; an d (B ) conduc t a

n initia l flar e complianc e assessmen t i n accordanc e wit h§63.987(b ) o f subpar t S S o f thi s part ; an d (C ) instal l an

d operat e monitoring equipmen t a s specifie d i n §63.987(c ) o f subpar t S S o f thi s part .

/ ^P.2 8



### 12 6

Tabl e 4 to Subpar t EEEE—Wor kPractic e Standard s A s state

din§63.2346(c) , yo umus t comply

withth

e workpractic e standards fo r organi c liquiddistribution affectedsource s inth e followin

gtable : For each.. . Yo umust. . . (1 ) storag e tan

k a t ana s a nalternative t o the existing o r newaffecte d emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f sourc e meeting an

yse t o f thi s subpart , compl ywit h capacit yan

d vapo r pressur e the requirement s o f subpar t limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , W W(contro l leve l 2 ) o f thi s item s 1- 4 o f thi s subpart . part .



# /2t>12 7 (2 ) transfe r rac k affecte d loadin g positio na t a n existin g o r ne waffecte d sourc e tha t meet s th e throughpu t cutof f specifie d i nTabl e 2 , ite m5 o f thi s subpart . (A ) fo r carg o tank s equippe d wit hvapo r collectio n equipment , ensur e tha t organi c liquid s ar e loade d onl yint o carg o tank s tha t hav e bee n demonstrated , usin g EP AMetho d 2 7 withi n th e las t 1 2 months , t o b e vapor-tigh t (i.e. , wil l underg o a pressur e chang e o f no t mor e tha n 25 0 pascal s ( 1 inc ho f water ) withi n 5 minute s afte r bein g pressurize d t o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water)) . Follo wth e step s outline d i n §60.502(e ) o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , subpar t X Xfo r thes e equippe d carg o tanks . Th e require d vapo r tightnes s documentatio ni s describe d i n§60.505(b) ; and (B ) fo r carg o tank s withou t vapo r collectio nequipment , ensur e tha t organi c liquid s ar e loade d onl yint o carg o tank s tha t hav e a curren t certificatio n i n accordanc e wit hth e U.S . DO T pressur e tes t requirements ; an d (C ) compl ywit hth e provision s i n§60.502(d) , (f) , (g) , (h) , an d (i ) o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , subpar t X Xfo r th e equippe d carg o tank s describe d i nite m2. B i n Tabl e 4 o f thi s subpart . (3 ) piec e o f equipment , a s define d unde r §63.2406 , o f thi s subpart , tha t operate s i norgani c liquid s servic e _ : 30 0 hour s pe r year . compl ywit hth e requirement s o f subpar t T T (contro l leve l 1 ) o r subpar t U

U(contro l leve l 2 ) o f thi s part .



# /<? ?12 8

Tabl e 5 t o Subpar t EEEE—Requirement s fo r Performanc e Test s A s state di n§§63.235 8 an d63.2362(a) , yo umus t compl y wit hth e requirement s fo r performanc e test s fo r existin go r ne w affecte dsource s i nth e followin gtable : For . Yo umus t conduc t a performanc e test... Using . To determine.. . Accordin gt o th e

followin g requirements .. . (1 ) eac hexistin g an d eac hne w affecte d sourc e usin g a nonflar e contro l devic e t o compl ywit ha n emissio nlimi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . t o determin e th e organi c HA P o r TO C contro l efficienc yo f eac hnonflar e contro l device , o r th e exhaus t concentratio no f eac hcombustio n device . (a ) Metho d 1 o r 1 Ai n appendi xAo f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , a s appropriate . samplin g por t

location s an d th e require d numbe r o f travers e points . (JL ) samplin g site s

mus t b e locate d a t th e inle t an d outle t o f eac hcontro l devic e an d prio r t o an yrelease s t o th e atmosphere ; an d (2. ) samplin g site s mus t b e locate d a t th e outle t o f eac h contro l devic e an d prio r t o an yrelease s t o th e atmosphere . (b ) Metho d 2 , 2A , 2C , 2D , 2F , o r 2 Gi n appendi xAo f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , a s appropriate . stac k ga s

velocit yan d volumetri c flo wrate .



## v j

### 12 9 (c ) Metho d 3 concentratio n o r 3 B i n o f C0 2 

### an d 0 2 

### appendi xAo f an

d dry 4 0 CF Rpar t molecula r 60 , a s weigh t o f th e appropriate . stac k gas . (d ) Metho d 4 moistur e i n appendi xAconten t o f o f 4 0 CF Rth e stac k par t 60 . gas .



# - a

C O13 0 (e ) Metho d 18 , 25 , o r 25 Ai n appendi xAo f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , a s appropriate , o r Metho d 31 6 i n appendi xA o f 4 0 CF R par t 6 3 fo r measurin g formaldehyde . tota l organi c

HA P o r TOC , o r formaldehyd e emissions . (JL ) th e organi c HA P

use d fo r th e calibratio n ga s fo r Metho d 25 Amus t b e th e singl e organi c HA P representin g th e larges t percen t b y volum e o f emissions ; an d (2. ) durin g th e performanc e tes t o r a desig n evaluation , yo u mus t establis h th e operatin g paramete r limit s withi n whic htota l organi c HA P o r TO C emission s ar e reduce d b ya t leas t 9 5 weight-percen t o r t o 2 0 ppm vexhaus t concentration .13 1

(2 ) eac hcarg o tan k tha t yo u ow n tha t load s a t a n existin g o r ne w affecte d transfe r rac k loadin g positio nan d equippe d wit h vapo r collectio n equipment . t o determin e th e vapo r tightnes s o f th e tan k an d repai r a s neede d unti l i t passe s th e test . Metho d 2 7 i n appendi xAo f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 . vapo r

tightness . Th e pressur e chang e

i n th e tan k mus t b e n o mor e tha n 25 0 pascal s ( 1 inc ho f water ) i n 5 minute s afte r i t i s pressurize d t o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water) .13 2

Tabl e 6 t o Subpar t EEEE—Initia l Complianc e Wit hEmissio nLimit s A s state di n§§63.237 0 (a ) an d63.2382(e) , yo umus t sho w initia l complianc e wit hth e emissionlimit s fo r existin go r new affecte dsource s accordin gto th e followin gtable : Fo r eac h Fo r th e followin g emissio n limit.. . Yo uhav e demonstrate dinitia l

complianc e if .. . By .

(1 ) storag e tan k a t a nexistin g affecte d sourc e meetin g eithe r se t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , item s 1 an d 2 o f thi s subpart . reduc e tota l organi c HA P o r TO C emission s by a t leas t 9 5 weight

percent , o r t o a n exhaus t concentrati o no f <2 0 ppmv . (2 ) storag e tan k a t a ne waffecte d sourc e meetin g eithe r se t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , item s 3 an d 4 o f thi s subpart . tota l organi c HA P o r TO C emissions , base d o nth e result s o f th e performanc e testin g specifie d i n Tabl e 5 o f thi s subpart , ar e reduce d b ya t leas t 9 5 weight-percen t o r t o a nexhaus t concentratio n o f ^2 0 ppmv . 3 year s afte r publicatio n o f fina l rul e i n th e FR .

th e initia l startu p dat e fo r th e affecte d source .13 3

(3 ) transfe r rac k loadin g positio na t a nexistin g affecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughpu t leve l fo r organi c liquid s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , ite m5 o f thi s subpart . (4 ) transfe r rac k loadin g positio na t a ne waffecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughput.leve l fo r organi c liquid s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , ite m5 o f thi s subpart . 3 year s afte r publicatio n o f fina l rul e i n th e FR .

th e initia l startu p dat e fo r th e affecte d source .

Tabl e 7 t o Subpar t EEEE—Initia l Complianc e wit hWor kPractic e Standard s A s state di n§§63.237 0 (a ) an d63.2382(e) , yo umus t show initia l complianc e wit hth e wor k practic e standard s fo r existin go r ne w affecte dsource s accordin gt o th e followin gtable : Fo r each . Fo r th e followin g standard.. . Yo uhav e demonstrate dinitia l complianc e if.. . By.. .13 4

(1 ) storag e tan k a t a n existin g affecte d sourc e meetin g eithe r se t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , item s 1 an d 2 o f thi s subpart . instal l a floatin g roo f o r equivalen t contro l tha t meet s th e requirement s i nTabl e 4 , ite m1 o f thi s subpart . yo u visuall yinspec t eac h interna l floatin g roo f before ' th e initia l fillin g o f th e storag e tank , an d perfor msea l ga p inspection s o f th e primar y an d secondar yri mseal s o f eac hexterna l floatin g roo f withi n9 0 day s afte r th e initia l fillin g o f th e storag e tank . 3 year s afte r publicatio n o f fina l rul e i n th e FR .

(2 ) storag e tan k a t a ne waffecte d sourc e meetin g eithe r se t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , item s 3 an d 4 o f thi s subpart . th e initia l startu p dat e fo r th e affecte d source .

(3 ) transfe r rac k loadin g positio na t a n existin g affecte d sourc e tha t meet s th e throughpu t cutof f i n Tabl e 2 , ite m

5 o f thi s subpart . loa d organi c liquid s onl yint o carg o tank s havin g curren t vapo r tightnes s certificatio n a s describe d i nTabl e 4 , ite m2 o f thi s subpart . yo u tak e step s t o ensur e tha t onl yvapor-tigh t carg o tank s loa d a t affecte d loadin g positions . 3 year s afte r publicatio n o f fina l rul e i n th e FR .13 5

(4 ) transfe r rac k th e initia l loadin g positio na t a startu p dat e ne waffecte d sourc e fo r th e tha t meet s th e affecte d throughpu t cutof f i nsource . Tabl e 2 , ite m5 o f thi s subpart . (5 ) piec e o f equipmen t carr you t a lea k yo u mak e availabl e writte n 3 year s a t a nexistin g detectio n an d repai r specification s fo r th e lea k afte r affecte d source , a s progra mo r equivalen t detectio n an d repai r progra mpublicatio n define d unde r §63.241 0 contro l accordin g t o o r equivalen t contro l o f fina l o f thi s subpar t tha t on e o f th e subpart s approach . rul e i n th e operate s i norgani c liste d i nTabl e 4 , FR . liquid s servic e > 30 0 ite m3 o f thi s hour s pe r year . subpart . (6 ) piec e o f equipmen t th e initia l a t a ne waffecte d startu p dat e source , a s define d fo r th e unde r §63.241 0 o f thi s affecte d subpar t tha t operate s source , i norgani c liquid s servic e > 30 0 hour s pe r year .
Tabl e 8 t o Subpar t EEEE--Continuou s Complianc e wit hEmissio nLimit s A s state di n§§63.2378(a ) an d(b ) an d63.2390(c) , yo umus t show continuou s complianc e wit hth e emissio nlimit s fo r existin go r ne w affecte dsource s accordin g t o th e followin gtable : 

# n13 6

Fo r .. . Fo r th e followin g emissio nlimit.. . Yo umus t demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by. . . (1 ) eac hstorag e tan k a t a n existin g o r ne waffecte d sourc e meetin g anyse t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h4 o f thi s subpart . reductio no f tota l organi c HA P o r TO C emission s fro mth e close d ven t syste m an d contro l devic e mus t b e 9 5 weight

percen t o r greater , o r 2 0 ppmvo f organi c HA P o r TO C i n th e exhaus t o f combustio ndevices . (a ) performin g CM S monitorin g an d collectin g dat a accordin g t o §§63.2366 , 63.2374 , an d 63.2378 ; an d (b ) maintainin g th e site

specifi c operatin g limit s withi n th e range s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test . (2 ) eac htransfe r rac k loadin g positio na t a nexistin g o r ne w affecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughpu t cutof f fo r organi c liquid s specifie d i nTabl e 2 , ite m5 o f thi s subpart .

Tabl e 9 t o Subpar t EEEE—Continuou s Complianc e wit hOperatin gLimit s A s state di n§§63.237 8 (a ) an d(b ) an d63.2390(c) , yo umus t show continuou s complianc e wit hth e operatin glimit s fo r existin go r new affecte dsource s accordin gt o th e followin gtable :

# u) N J Fo r eac hexistin gan d

eac hnew

.. . (1 ) affecte d sourc e usin g a therma l oxidize r t o compl ywit ha n emissio nlimi t i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart .

(2 ) affecte d sourc e usin g a catalyti c oxidize r t o compl ywit h a nemissio nlimi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . 13 7 Fo r th e followin g operatin glimit. . . maintai nth e hourl y averag e firebo x temperatur e greate r tha no r equa l t o th e

- referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test .

(A ) replac e th e existin g catalys t be d wit ha catalys t be d tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . Yo umus t demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by. . . (a ) continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g firebo xtemperatur e ever y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e firebo x temperatur e greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (a ) replacin g th e existin g catalys t be d wit ha catalys t be d tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .13 8



# K (B ) maintai nth e hourl yaverag e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d a t leas t ever y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (C ) maintai nth e hourl yaverag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate r tha no r equa l t o th e minimu m temperatur e differenc e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperatur e a t th e outle t o f th e catalys t be d ever y 1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e minimu mtemperatur e differenc e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .(3 ) affecte d sourc e

usin g a condense r t o compl ywit ha nemissio n limi t i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . 13 9 maintai nth e hourl y averag e condense r exi t temperatur e les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperatur e a t th e exi t o f th e condense r a t leas t ever y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e condense r exi t temperatur e les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e 'temperatur e establishe d durin g the-desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .



## A /^ ^ > (4 ) affecte d sourc e

usin g a nadsorptio n syste mwit hadsorben t regeneratio nt o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimi t i nTabl e 2 o f thi s subpart . 140 . (A ) replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f th e be d wit ha n adsorben t tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (B ) maintai nth e frequenc yo f regeneratio ngreate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e frequenc y establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) replacin g th e existin g adsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f th e be d wit ha n adsorben t tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .
(a ) maintainin g th e frequenc y o f regeneratio n greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e frequenc y establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .14 1 (C ) maintai n th e tota l regeneratio n strea m mas s flo wdurin g th e adsorptio nbe d regeneratio n cycl e greate r tha no r equa l t o th e referenc e strea mmas s flo w establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) maintainin g th e tota l regeneratio n strea mmas s flo w durin g th e adsorptio n be d regeneratio n cycl e greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e strea m mas s flo westablishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (D ) maintai n th e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio nbe d durin g regeneratio n(excep t durin g th e coolin g cycle ) greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio n be d durin g regeneratio n (excep t durin g th e coolin g cycle ) greate r tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; and . (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .14 2 (E ) maintai nth e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio nbe d afte r regeneratio n(and withi n1 5 minute s afte r completin g an y coolin g cycle ) les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio n be d afte r regeneratio n (and withi n 1 5 minute s afte r completin g an y coolin g cycle ) les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (5 ) affecte d sourc e usin g a nadsorptio n syste m withou t adsorben t regeneratio nt o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimi t i nTabl e 2 . (A ) replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f th e be d wit ha nadsorben t tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) replacin g th e existin g adsorben t i n eac hsegmen t o f th e be d wit ha n adsorben t tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu mallowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .



## 4 i14 3 (B ) maintai nth e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio nbe d les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio no r performanc e test . (a ) maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorptio n be d les s tha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig nevaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (6 ) affecte d sourc e usin g a flar e t o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimi t i nTabl e 2 . (A ) maintai n a pilo t flam e presen t i n th e flar e a t al l time s tha t vapor s ar e no t bein g vente d t o th e flar e (§63.11(b ) (5) ) . (a ) continuousl yoperatin g a devic e tha t detect s th e presenc e o f th e pilo t flame ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (B ) maintai na flar e flam e a t al l time s tha t vapor s ar e bein g vente d fro mth e emissio nsourc e (§63.11(b ) (5) ) . (a ) maintainin g a flar e flam e a t al l time s tha t vapor s ar e bein g vente d fro mth e emissio n source ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (C ) operat e th e flar e wit hn o visibl e emissions , excep t fo r up t o 5 minute s i nan y 2 consecutiv e hour s (§63.11(b)(4)) . •.(a ) operatin g th e flar e wit hn o visibl e emission s exceedin g th e amoun t allowed ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .14 4 (D ) operat e th e flar e wit ha n exi t velocit y tha t i s withi nth e applicabl e limit s i n §63.11(b)(6) , (7) , an d (8 ) . (a ) operatin g th e flar e withi n th e applicabl e exi t velocit y limits ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 . (E ) operat e th e flar e wit ha ne t heatin g valu e o f th e ga s bein g combuste d greate r tha n th e applicabl e minimu m valu e i n §63.11(b ) (6 ) (ii ) . (a ) operatin g th e flar e wit h th e ga s ne t heatin g valu e withi n th e applicabl e limit ; an d (b ) keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998 .

Tabl e 1 0 t o Subpar t EEEE—Continuou s Complianc e wit hWor kPractic e Standard s A s state di n§§63.2378(a ) an d(b ) an d63.2386(c ) (6) , yo umus t sho w continuou s complianc e wit hth e wor kpractic e standard s fo r existin go r ne w affecte dsource s accordin gt o th e followin gtable : For.. . Fo r th e followin g standard. . Yo umus t demonstrat e continuou s complianc e

by . . .(1 ) eac hinterna l

floatin g roo f (IFR ) storag e tan k a t a n existin g 'o

r ne w affecte d sourc e meetin g anyse t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h4 o f thi s subpart .

(2 ) eac hexterna l floatin g roo f (EFR ) storag e tan k a t a n existin g o r ne w affecte d sourc e meetin g anyse t o f capacit yan d vapo r pressur e limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h4 o f thi s subpart . instal l a floatin g roo f designe d an d operate d accordin g t o th e applicabl e specification s i n §63.1063(a ) an d (b) . 14 5 (a ) visuall yinspectin g th e floatin g roo f deck , dec k fittings , an d ri mseal s o f eac h IFR : onc e pe r year , an d eac htim e th e storag e tan k i s completel yemptie d an d degassed , o r ever y1 0 years , whicheve r occur s firs t (§63.1063(c)(1) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d (b ) keepin g th e tan k record s require d i n §63.1065 .

(a ) visuall yinspectin g th e floatin g roo f deck , dec k fittings , an d ri mseal s o f eac h EF Reac htim e th e storag e tan k i s completel yemptie d an d degassed , o r ever y 1 0 years , whicheve r occur s firs t (§63.1063(c)(2) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d (b ) performin g sea l ga p measurement s o n th e secondar ysea l o f eac hEF R a t leas t onc e ever yyear , an d o n th e primar ysea l o f eac hEF R a t leas t ever y5 year s (§63.1063(c)(2) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d (c ) keepin g th e tan k record s require d i n §63.1065 .- $ ^ 

### 14 6

(3 ) eac hIFRo r EFRrepai r th e (a ) repairin g condition s causin g tank a t anexisting o r condition s inspectio nfailures : befor e refillin g th e newaffecte d sourc e causing storag e tank wit hliquid , o r withi n4 5 meeting an

yse t o f storag e tank day s (o r u p t o 10 5 day s wit hextensions ) capacit yan

d vapo r inspectio nfo r a tank containin g liquid ; and pressur e limit s failure s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , (§63.1063(e) ) . (b ) keeping th e tank record s require d i n item s 1 through4 o f §63.1065(b) . thi s subpart .14 7

Tabl e 1 1 t o Subpar t EEEE—Requirement s fo r Report s A s state di n§63.2386(b ) and(f ) , yo umus t submi t a complianc e o r startup , shutdown , an dmalfunctio nrepor t accordin gt o th e followin gtable : Yo umus t submi t a(n).. . Th e repor t mus t contain.. . Yo umus t submi t th e report . (1 ) complianc e report . (A ) a statemen t tha t ther e wer e n o deviation s fro mth e standard s durin g th e reportin g period ; o r i f yo u hav e a deviatio nfro man y standar d durin g th e reportin g period , th e repor t mus t contai nth e informatio n i n §63.2386(e) . (B ) i f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n durin g th e reportin g perio d an d yo u too k action s consisten t wit hyou r SSMP , th e complianc e repor t mus t includ e th e informatio ni n §63.10(d)(5)(i) . semiannually , an d i t mus t b e postmarke d withi n 3 0 day s afte r th e en d o f eac h calenda r hal f (§63.10(e)(3)(v)) .14 8

(2 ) immediat e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n repor t i f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n durin g th e reportin g perio d tha t i s no t consisten t wit h you r SSMP . (A ) action s take nfo r th e event .

(B ) th e informatio n i n §63.10(d)(5)(ii) . b yfa xo r telephon e withi n 2 workin g day s afte r startin g action s inconsisten t wit hth e plan .

b ylette r withi n 7 workin g day s afte r th e en d o f th e even t unles s yo u hav e mad e alternativ e arrangement s wit h th e permittin g authorit y (§63.10(d ) (5 ) (ii) ) .



# 4 ?

O l o

# 4* 14 9

Tabl e 1 2 t o Subpar t EEEE—Applicabilit y o f Genera l Provision s t o Subpar t EEE E A s state di n§63.2398 , yo umus t compl y wit hth e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin gt o th e followin gtable : Citatio n

§63. 1

§63. 2 §63.3 §63. 4

§63. 5 §63.6(a ) Subjec t

Applicabilit y

Definition s Unit s an d Abbreviation s Prohibite d Activitie s an d Circumventio n Construction / Reconstructio n Complianc e wit h Standards/O&M



### Applicabilit y Brie f Descriptio nApplie s t o Subpar t EEE E Initia l applicabilit yYe s determination ; Applicabilit y afte r standar d established ; Permi t requirements ; Extensions , Notification s Definition s fo r par t 6 3 standard s Ye s Unit s an d abbreviation s fo r par t Ye s 6 3 standard s Prohibite d activities ; Ye s Circumvention , Severabilit y Applicability ; Applications ; Ye s Approval s G P appl yunles s complianc e Ye s extension ; G P appl yt o are a source s tha t becom e majo r15 0 §63.6(b ) Complianc e

Date s fo r Ne w and Reconstructe d Source s Standard s appl ya t effectiv e

date ; 3 year s afte r effectiv e date ; upo n startup ; 1 0 year s afte r constructio no r reconstructio n commence s fo r sectio n112(f ) Ye s

§63.6(b)(5 ) Notificatio n Mus t notif yi f commence d constructio no r reconstructio n afte r proposa l Ye s
§63.6(b)(6 ) §63.6(b ) [Reserved ]

Complianc e Date s fo r Ne w and Reconstructe d Are a Source s tha t Becom e Majo r Are a source s tha t becom e majo r

mus t compl ywit hmajo r sourc e standard s immediatel yupo n becomin g major , regardles s o f whethe r require d t o compl ywhe n the ywer e a nare a sourc e Ye s

§63.6(c ) (l)-(2 ) Complianc e

Date s fo r Existin g Source s 1 . Compl yaccordin g t o dat e i n

subpart , whic hmus t b e n o late r tha n3 year s afte r effectiv e dat e 2 . Fo r sectio n112(f ) standards , compl ywithi n9 0 day s o f effectiv e dat e unles s complianc e extensio n Ye s

§63.6(c)(3 ] (4 ) [Reserved ] 

# I

O l r o15 1

§6 3 (5 ) 6(c ) Complianc e

Date s fo r Existin g Are a Source s tha t Becom e Majo r Are a source s tha t becom e majo r

mus t compl ywit hmajo r sourc e standard s b ydat e indicate d i n subpar t o r b yequivalen t tim e perio d (e.g. , 3 ' years ) Ye s

§63.6(d ) [Reserved ] §63.6(e ; (l)-(2 ) Operatio n&

Maintenanc e 1 . Operat e t o minimiz e emission s

a t al l time s Ye s
2 . Correc t malfunction s a s soo n a s practicabl e 3 . Operatio nan d maintenanc e requirement s independentl y enforceable ; informatio n .Administrato r wil l us e t o determin e i f operatio nan d maintenanc e requirement s wer e me t §63.6(e ) Startup , 1 . Requiremen t fo r SS Mpla n Ye s (3 ) Shutdown , an d

Malfunctio n2 . Conten t o f SS Mpla n (SSM ) Pla n §63.6(f ) Complianc e Yo u mus t compl ywit hemissio n Ye s (1 ) excep t Durin g standard s a t al l time s excep t

SS M.lli_ : .i5£...§.?.?
_ §63.6(f ) Method s fo r Complianc e base d o nperformanc e Ye s (2)-(3 ) Determinin g test , operatio nan d maintenanc e

Complianc e plans , records , inspectio n

* \15 2

§63.6(g ; (l)-(3 ) Alternativ e

Standar d Procedure s fo r gettin g a n

alternativ e standar d Ye s §63.6(h ) Opacity/Visib l

e Emissio n (VE ) Standard s Requirement s fo r opacit yan d

visibl e emissio n standard s No . Th e subpar t doe s no t hav e opacity/V E standard s §63.6(h ) 

## ( D Complianc e

wit h Opacity/V E Standard s Yo u mus t compl ywit hopacity/V E

standard s a t al l time s excep t durin g SS M N o

§63.6(h)(2 ) (i ) Determinin g

Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standard s I f standar d doe s no t stat e tes t

method , us e Metho d 9 fo r opacit y an d Metho d 2 2 fo r V E N o

§63.6(h ) (2)(ii ) [Reserved ] §63.6(h ) (2)(iii ) Usin g Previou s

Test s t o Demonstrat e Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standard s Criteri a fo r whe n previou s

opacity/V E testin g ca nb e use d t o sho wcomplianc e wit hthi s subpar t N o

§63.6(h ) (3 ) [Reserved ]



# v15 3

§63.6(h ) (4 )

§63.6(h ) (5 ) (i) , (iii)

- (v ) Notificatio n

o f Opacity/VE Observatio n Dat e Mus t notif yAdministrato r o f

anticipate d dat e o f observatio n N o

Conductin g Opacity/VE Observation s Date s an d schedul e fo r conductin g opacity/VE observation s N o



## I v §63.6(h )

(5)(ii )

§63.6(h ) (6 )

§63.6(h ) (7)(i )

§63.6(h ) (7)(ii ) Opacit yTes t

Duratio n an d Averagin g Time s Record s o f Condition s Durin g Opacity/V E Observation s Repor t COM S Monitorin g Dat a fro m Performanc e Tes t Usin g COM S instea d o f Metho d 9 Mus t hav e a t leas t 3 hour s o f

observatio nwit hthirt y6-minut e average s Mus t kee p record s availabl e an d allo wAdministrato r t o inspec t

Mus t submi t COM S dat a wit hothe r performanc e tes t dat a

Ca nsubmi t COM S dat a instea d o f Metho d 9 result s eve n i f rul e require s Metho d 9 , bu t mus t notif yAdministrato r befor e performanc e tes t N o

N o

N o

N o15 4

§63.6(h ) (7 ) (iii ) Averagin g Tim e

fo r COM S durin g Performanc e Tes t T o determin e compliance , mus t

reduc e COM S dat a t o 6-minut e average s N o

§63.6(h ) (7)(iv ) COM S

Requirement s Owner/operato r mus t demonstrat e

tha t COM S performanc e evaluation s ar e conducte d accordin g t o §63.8(e) ; COM S ar e properl y maintaine d an d operate d accordin g t o §63.8(c ) an d dat a qualit ya s §63.8(d ) N o

§63.6(h ) (7 ) (v ) Determinin g

Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standard s COM S i s probabl e bu t no t

conclusiv e evidenc e o f complianc e wit hopacit ystandard , eve n i f Metho d 9 observatio n show s otherwise . Requirement s fo r COM S t o b e probabl e evidence-prope r maintenance , meetin g P S 1 , an d dat a hav e no t bee n altere d N o



### §6 3 (8 )

§6 3 (9 ) 6(h )

6(h ) Determining

Complianc e wit h Opacity/VE Standard s Adjuste d Opacit y Standard Administrato r wil l us e al l COMS ,

Metho d 9 , an d Metho d 2 2 results , a s wel l a s informatio n abou t operatio nan d maintenanc e t o determin e compj-ianc e Ye s



### Procedure s fo r

Administrato r

t o adjus t a nopacit y standar d Ye s 

# 2

O l§63.6(i )

(1)-(14 ) Complianc e

Extensio n 15 5

Procedure s an d criteri a fo r Administrato r t o gran t complianc e extensio n Ye s

§63. 6 (j ) Presidentia l

Complianc e Exemptio n Presiden t ma yexemp t an ysourc e

fro mrequiremen t t o compl ywit h subpar t Ye s
§63.7(a ) (l)-(2 ) Performanc e

Tes t Date s Date s fo r conductin g initia l

performanc e testin g an d othe r complianc e demonstrations . Mus t conduc t 18 0 day s afte r firs t subjec t t o subpar t No . Thes e date s ar e containe d i n §63.235 4 §63.7(a ) (3 ) Sectio n11 4

Authorit y Administrato r ma yrequir e a

performanc e tes t unde r CAA sectio n11 4 a t an ytim e Ye s
§63.7(b ) 

## ( D Notificatio n

o f Performanc e Tes t Mus t notif yAdministrato r 6 0 day s

befor e th e tes t '"" ' Ye s
§63.7(b ) (2 ) Notificatio n

o f Reschedulin g I f hav e t o reschedul e performanc e

test , mus t notif yAdministrato r o f reschedule d dat e 5 day s befor e schedule d dat e Ye s

$ O l ^115 6

§63.7(c ) Qualit y

Assurance/Tes t Pla n 1 . Requiremen t t o submi t site

specifi c tes t pla n 6 0 day s befor e th e tes t o r o ndat e Administrato r agree s wit h Ye s

2 . Tes t pla napprova l procedure s 3 . Performanc e audi t requirement s
4 . Interna l an d externa l Q A procedure s fo r testin g §63.7(d ) Testin g

Facilitie s Requirement s fo r testin g facilitie s Ye s §63.7(e ) 

## ( D Condition s fo r

Conductin g Performanc e Test s Performanc e test s mus t b e conducte d unde r representativ e condition s Canno t conduc t performanc e test s durin g SS M No t a violatio nt o excee d standar d ^durin g SS M Ye s

§63. 7 (e

l (2 ) Condition s fo r

Conductin g Performanc e Test s Mus t conduc t accordin g t o subpar t an d EP Ates t method s unles s Administrato r approve s alternativ e Ye s



# £ ^ O l o o15 7 §63.7(e ) Tes t Ru n1 . Mus t hav e thre e tes t run s o f Ye s (3 ) Duratio na t leas t on e hou r eac h 2 . Complianc e i s base d o n arithmeti c mea nofthre e run s 3 . Condition s whe ndat a fro ma n additiona l tes t ru nca nb e use d §63.7(f ) Alternativ e Procedure s b ywhic hAdministrato r Ye s

Tes t Metho d ca ngran t approva l t o us e a n

alternativ e tes t metho d §63.7(g ) Performanc e 1 . Mus t includ e ra wdat a i n Ye s

Tes t Dat a performanc e tes t repor t Analysi s .2 . Mus t submi t performanc e tes t dat a 6 0 day s afte r en d o f test . wit hth e notificatio no f complianc e statu s 3 . Kee p dat a fo r 5 year s §63.7(h ) Waive r o f Procedure s fo r Administrato r t o Ye s

Test s waiv e performanc e tes t §63.8(a ) Applicabilit ySubjec t t o al l monitorin g Ye s (1 ) o f Monitorin g requirement s i nstandar d

Requirement s §63.8(a ) Performanc e Performanc e Specification s i nYe s (2 ) Specification s appendi xB o f par t 6 0 appl y

Ol15 8

§63.8(a ) [Reserved ] 

### J.3 ) ; §63.8(a ) Monitorin g Unles s thi s subpar t say s Ye s (4 ) wit hFlare s otherwise , th e requirement s fo r flare s i n§63.1 1 appl y §63.8(b ) Monitorin g Mus t conduc t monitorin g accordin g Ye s (1 ) t o standar d unles s Administrato r approve s alternativ e §63.8(b ) Multipl e 1 . Specifi c requirement s fo r Ye s (2)-(3 ) Effluent s an d installin g monitorin g system s

Multipl e Monitorin g 2 . Mus t instal l o neac heffluen t System s befor e i t i s combine d an d befor e i t i s release d t o th e atmospher e unles s Administrato r approve s otherwis e 3 . I f mor e tha non e monitorin g syste mo na nemissio npoint , mus t repor t al l monitorin g syste m results , unles s on e monitorin g syste mi s a backu p §63.8(c ) (1 ) Monitorin g

Syste m Operatio nan d Maintenanc e Maintai nmonitorin g syste mi na manne r consisten t wit hgoo d ai r pollutio ncontro l practice s Ye s§63.8(c ]

(1 ) (i ) Routin e an d

Predictabl e SS M • 15 9

1 . Follo wth e SS Mpla n fo r routin e repair s ' • 2 . Kee p part s fo r routin e repair s readil yavailabl e 3 . Reportin g requirement s fo r SS Mwhe nactio ni s describe d i n SS Mpla n Ye s

§63.8(c ) (1)(ii ) SS Mno t i nSS M

pla n Reportin g requirement s fo r SS M

whe n actio n i s no t describe d i n SS Mpla n Ye s
§63.8(c ) (1)(iii ) Complianc e

wit hOperatio n an d Maintenanc e Requirement s 1 . Ho wAdministrato r determine s

i f sourc e complyin g wit h operatio nan d maintenanc e requirement s 2 . Revie wo f sourc e O& M procedures , records , manufacturer's.recommendations ; inspection s Ye s

§63.8(c ) (2)-(3 ) Monitorin g

Syste m Installatio n 1. . Mus t instal l t o ge t

representativ e emissio n o r paramete r measurement s 2 . Mus t verif yoperationa l statu s befor e o r a t performanc e tes t Ye s

b >§63.8(c ) (4 ) CM S

Requirement s Yes . However , CEMS/COM S ar e no t applicable . 16 0 1 . CM S mus t b e operatin g excep t durin g breakdown , out-o f control , repair , maintenance , an d high

leve l calibratio n drift s 2 . COM S mus t hav e a minimu mo f on e cycl e o f samplin g an d analysi s fo r eac hsuccessiv e 10

- secon d perio d an d on e cycl e o f dat a recordin g fo r eac h successiv e 6-minut e perio d 3 . CEM S mus t hav e a minimu mo f on e cycl e o f operatio nfo r eac h successiv e 15-minut e perio d §63.8(c ) COM S Minimu mCOM S minimu mprocedure s N o (5 ) Procedure s §63.8(c ) CM S Zer o an d hig hleve l calibratio nYe s (6)-(8 ) Requirement s chec k requirement s Out-of-contro l period s §63.8(d ) CM S Qualit y1 . Requirement s fo r CM S qualit yYe s

Contro l control , includin g calibration , et c 2 . Mus t kee p qualit ycontro l pla no nrecor d fo r 5 years ; kee p ol d version s fo r 5 year s afte r revision s16 1

§63.8(e ) CM S Notification , performanc e Ye s

Performanc e evaluatio n tes t plan , report s Evaluatio n §63.8(f ) Alternativ e Procedure s fo r Administrato r t o Ye s (l)-(5 ) Monitorin g approv e alternativ e monitorin g

Metho d §63.8(f ) Alternativ e t o Procedure s fo r Administrato r t o N o (6 ) Relativ e approv e alternativ e relativ e

Accurac yTes t accurac ytest s fo r CEM S §63.8(g ) Dat a Reductio n 1 . COM S 6-minut e average s Yes . calculate d ove r a t leas t 3 6 However , evenl yspace d dat a point s CEMS/COM S ar e no t 2 . CEM S 1 hou r average s compute d applicable , ove r a t leas t 4 equall yspace d dat a point s 3 . Dat a tha t canno t b e use d i n averag e §63.9(a ) Notificatio n Applicabilit yan d Stat e Ye s

Requirement s delegatio n

^16 2

§63.9(b ) (l)-(5 ) Initia l

Notification s 1 . Submi t notificatio nwithi n 12 0 day s afte r effectiv e dat e 2 . Notificatio no f inten t t o construct/reconstruct ; Notificatio n o f commencemen t o f construction/reconstruction ; Notificatio no f startu p 3 . Content s o f eac h Ye s

§63.9(c ) Reques t fo r

Complianc e Extensio n Ca nreques t i f canno t compl yb y

dat e o r i f installe d BACT/LAE R Ye s
§63.9(d ) Notificatio n

o f Specia l Complianc e Requirement s fo r Ne w Source s Fo r source s tha t commenc e

constructio n betwee n proposa l an d promulgatio nan d wan t t o compl y3 year s afte r effectiv e dat e Ye s

§63.9(e ) Notificatio n

o f Performanc e Tes t Notif yAdministrato r 6 0 day s

prio r Ye s
§63.9(f ] Notificatio n

o f VE/Opacit y Tes t Notif yAdministrato r 3 0 day s

prio r N o

^ 

# V16 3

§63.9(g ) Additiona l 1 . Notificatio no f performanc e Yes .

Notification s evaluatio n However , Whe nUsin g CM S ther e ar e n o 2 . Notificatio n abou t us e o f opacity/V E COM S dat a standards . 3 . Notificatio ntha t exceede d criterio nfo r relativ e accurac y alternativ e §63.9(h ) Notificatio n 1 . Content s Ye s (l)-(6 ) o f Complianc e

Statu s 2 . Du e 6 0 day s afte r en d o f

performanc e tes t o r othe r complianc e demonstration , excep t fo r opacity/VE , whic har e du e 3 0 day s afte r 3 . Whe n t o submi t t o Federa l vs . Stat e authorit y §63.9(i ) Adjustmen t o f Procedure s fo r Administrato r t o Ye s

Submitta l approv e chang e in'whe n Deadline s notification s mus t b e submitte d §63.9(j ) Chang e i nMus t submi t withi n1 5 day s afte r Ye s

Previou s th e chang e Informatio n16 4

§63.10(a ) Recordkeeping / 1 . Applie s t o all , unles s Ye s

Reportin g complianc e extension . 2 . Whe nt o submi t t o Federa l vs . Stat e authorit y 3 . Procedure s fo r owner s o f mor e tha n 1 sourc e §63.10(b ) Recordkeeping / 1 . Genera l requirement s Ye s (1 ) Reportin g 2 . Kee p al l record s readil y availabl e 3 . Kee p for

_5 year s §63.10(b ) Record s 1 . Occurrenc e o f eac hfo r Ye s (2)(i)-(iv ) Relate d t o operation s (proces s equipment )

Startup , Shutdown , an d 2 . Occurrenc e o f eac h Malfunctio nmalfunctio no f ai r pollutio n contro l equipmen t 3 . Maintenanc e o nai r pollutio n contro l equipmen t 4 . Action s durin g startups , shutdowns , an d malfunction s §63.10(b ) CM S Record s Malfunctions , inoperative , out
- Ye s (2)(vi)-(xi ) of-contro l period s §63.10(b ) Record s Record s whe nunde r waive r Ye s (2)(xii )16 5

§63.10(b ) Record s Record s whe nusin g alternativ e t o Ye s (2)(xiii ) relativ e accurac ytes t §63.10(b ) Record s Al l documentatio nsupportin g Ye s (2)(xiv ) initia l notificatio nan d .notifica.ti.on o f complianc e statu s §63.10(b ) Record s Applicabilit ydetermination s Ye s (3 ) §63.10(c ) Record s Additiona l record s fo r CM S Ye s §63.10(d ) Genera l Requiremen t t o repor t Ye s (1 ) Reportin g

Requirement s §63.10(d ) Repor t o f Whe nt o submi t t o Federa l o r Ye s (2 ) Performanc e Stat e authorit y

Tes t Result s §63.10(d ) Reportin g Wha t t o repor t an d whe nYe s (3 ) Opacit yo r V E

Observation s §63.10(d ) Progres s Mus t submi t progres s report s o nYe s (4 ) Report s schedul e i f unde r complianc e extensio n §63.10(d ) Startup , Content s an d submissio nYe s (5 ) Shutdown , an d

Malfunctio n Report s

^16 6

§63.10(e ) (l)-(2 ) Additiona l CM S 1 . Mus t repor t result s fo r eac h

Report s CEM S o n a uni t 2 . Writte ncop yo f CM S performanc e evaluatio n 3 . 2- 3 copie s o f COM S performanc e evaluatio n Yes . However , CEMS/COM S ar e no t applicable .

§63.10(e ) (3 ) (i)-(iii ) Report s Schedul e fo r reportin g exces s emission s an d paramete r monito r exceedanc e (nowdefine d a s deviations ) Yes . However , not e tha t th e titl e o f th e repor t i s th e complianc e report . Deviation s ar e exces s emission s o r paramete r exceedances .



# C ^16 7

§63.10(e ) (3 ) (iv)-(v ) Exces s

Emission s Report s 1 . Requiremen t t o rever t t o

quarterl ysubmissio ni f ther e i s a nexces s emission s an d paramete r monito r exceedance s (nowdefine d a s deviations ) 2 . Provisio nt o reques t semiannua l reportin g afte r complianc e fo r 1 yea r 3 . Submi t repor t by30 c hda y followin g en d o f quarte r o r calenda r hal f Ye s

Ye s

Ye s

Ye s
4 . I f ther e ha s no t bee n a n exceedanc e o r exces s emission s (nowdefine d a s deviations) , repor t content s i na statemen t tha t ther e hav e bee nn o deviation s 5 . Mus t submi t repor t containin g al l o f th e informatio n i n §§63.8(c ) (7)-(8) . an d 63.10(c)(5)

- (13 ) Ye s

§63.10(e ) (3 ) (vi)

- (viii ) Exces s

Emission s Repor t an d Summar yRepor t 1 . Requirement s fo r reportin g

exces s emission' s fo r CM S (now calle d deviations ) 2 . Require s al l o f th e informatio n i n §§63.1 0 (c ) (5)

- (13 ) an d 63.8(c)(7)-(8 ) Ye s


# 516 8 §63.10(e ) Reportin g COM S Mus t submi t COM S dat a wit hN/ A (4 ) dat a performanc e tes t dat a §63.10(f ) Waive r fo r Procedure s fo r Administrato r t o Ye s

Recordkeeping / waiv e Reportin g §63.1 1 Flare s Requirement s fo r flare s Ye s §63.1 2 Delegatio nStat e authorit yt o enforc e Ye s standard s §63.1 3 Addresse s Addresse s wher e reports , Ye s notifications , an d request s ar e sen t §63.1 4 Incorporatio nTes t method s incorporate d b yYe s

b yReferenc e referenc e §63.1 5 Availabilit yPubli c an d confidentia l Ye s

o f Informatio ninformatio n

0 ^