alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 14367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04073]



[[Page 14365]]

Vol. 89

Monday,

No. 38

February 26, 2024

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of February 8, 2024--Delegation of Authority Under Section 
1(j)(4) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 14367]]

                Memorandum of February 8, 2024

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 1(j)(4) of 
                the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of 
                State the functions and authority vested in the 
                President by section 1(j)(4) of the State Department 
                Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2651a(j)(4)) 
                to submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
                Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 
                House of Representatives the justification required in 
                conjunction with the renewal of a temporary appointment 
                pursuant to section 1(j)(3) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 
                2651a(j)(3)).

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 8, 2024

[FR Doc. 2024-04073
Filed 2-23-24; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1945 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1945

 To direct the Secretary of the Navy to name the next available Naval 
    vessel after United States Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2011

  Mr. Hunter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Navy to name the next available Naval 
    vessel after United States Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF NAVAL VESSEL AFTER UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 
              SERGEANT RAFAEL PERALTA.

    The Secretary of the Navy shall name the next available Naval 
vessel after United States Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta.
                                 <all>
```
04/29/2010 10:25 FAX 2024935142 FAA DMS 21001/001 

D^PTOFIRAwSPOHl^ 

Re: Apollo A & HS Company ' ^ 

Amanda Bruchs to: Vicki Leemon 

AGC-300, Enforcement Division 

Cc: Allan Horowitz 

'Mi-blB 

3>ij/27/2010 05:25 PM 

Vicki: 

We've also had a problem v\/ith returned mail and FedEx packages sent to the company. The address 

that you have Is the same one that we've been using. The company hasn't provided an updated address. 

In addition to serving all of the documents in the case by FedEx and Registered Mail, however, we've also 

been serving documents by fax to a number provided by the company. It appears to have accepted the 

faxed documents. We have confirmation for all of the transmissions and we have not received notice 

from anyone that the faxes were sent/received in error. 

Please let me know If you have any additional questions or if you should require anything further. Thanks. 

Amanda K. Bruchs 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

(202) 493-5548 

Vicki Leemon FYI: I sent out the order granting the extension. 04/27/2010 05:02:58 PM 

From: Vicki Lecmon/AWA/FAA 

AGC-430, Adjudication Branch 

To: Amanda Bruch5/AWA/FAA@FAA 

Date: 04/27/2010 05:02 PM 

Subject: Apollo A & HS Company 

FYI: I sent out the order granting the extension of time that you requested in December. I sent it to Flat 

1515, Metro Centre 2, 21 Lam HIng Street, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. I just 

got it back. Someone wrote on the envelope: "Moved, Please Return To Sender." 

Do you have a better address? That's the same address to which you sent the appeal brief. 

Vicki S. Leemon 

Manager, Adjudication Branch, AGC-430 

Tel: (202)385-8227 

Fax; (202) 493-5020
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

Steam Study Data Review Notes 

Total Suspended Solids Standard Method 2540D (1991) 

(Dried at 103-105°C) 

1. The samples should be brought to room temperature before analysis. 

2. The filter should be dried in an oven at 103-105°C for 1 hour, cooled in a desiccator, and 

weighed. The above process should be repeated until the weight change was less than 

4% of the previous weight or 0.5 mg (whichever is less) (2540D/3a). 

3. Sample volumes should be selected so that 10-200 mg of dry residue would be acquired. 

If filtration took longer than 10 minutes, the filter size should be increased or the sample 

volume decreased (2540C/3c). 

4. After filtration, at least three aliquots of 10 ml of reagent-grade water should be added to 

the sample/filter and suction should be continued for 3 minutes after washing. 

5. The sample should be dried in an oven for a minimum of 1 hour at 103-105°C, cooled in 

a desiccator, and weighed. The above process should be repeated until the weight change 

was less than 4% of the previous weight or less than 0.5 mg (whichever is less). 

6. If laboratory duplicates were run, duplicate weights should be within 5% of their 

average? (2540D/3c). If applicable, indicate whether this criteria was met and specify the 

average and percent recovery from the average for each of the samples. 

7. Samples may contain calcium, magnesium, chloride and/or sulfate. Such species may 

make the sample hygroscopic. The following procedures should be done in order to 

prevent errors: drying time increased, proper dessication procedures used, and samples 

weighed rapidly (2540C/1b). 

8. Care should be taken to exclude large floating particles or submerged agglomerates 

(2540D/1b). 

9. Desiccant should be kept inside the balance to maintain humidity control in the balance. 

10. The oven temperature should be checked for proper setting and stability and the 

temperature recorded. If reported, indicate the oven temperature. 

11. The oven thermometer should be immersed in a sand bath or other suitable thermal mass. 

12. The desiccator should have a good seal (vacuum or grease). 

13. The balance should be checked with “S” class weights (100 mg, 1 g, and 100 g).

14. The analytical balance should have been serviced and calibrated within the last year. If 

provided, indicate the last date of service.
Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief Page 1 of 2

DOCKET NO. 12-14-00245-CR

CAUSE NO. 19062 

 

JUSTIN CHRISTIAN § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 

VS. § TWELFTH DISTRICT 

STATE OF TEXAS § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes JUSTIN CHRISTIAN, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, 

and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, pursuant 

to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the 

following: 

1. This case is on appeal from the 2nd Judicial District Court of Cherokee County, 

Texas. 

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. JUSTIN CHRISTIAN, and 

numbered 19062. 

3. Appellant was convicted of ASSAULT FAMILY VIOLENCE, IMPEDING 

BREATH/CIRCULATION. 

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of 10 years confinement institutional 

division, TDCJ on AUGUST 5, 2014. 

5. Notice of appeal was given on AUGUST 26, 2014 

6. The clerk's record was filed on SEPTEMBER 12, 2014; the reporter's record was 

filed in OCTOBER, 2014. 

7. The appellate brief is presently due on January 5, 2015. 

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 7 days from the present date, i.e. 

January 12, 2015 

9. This is the third request for extension to file the brief filed in this cause. 

10. Defendant is currently incarcerated. 

11. Appellant’s attorney has been unable to complete the brief due to his holiday 

schedule and Court appearances. 

12. Counsel requests this extension not for the sole purpose of delay but so that 

justice may be done. 

ACCEPTED

12-14-00245-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/6/2015 2:49:27 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/6/2015 2:49:27 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief Page 2 of 2

13. Counsel has conferred with the prosecuting attorney who he is in trial with in 

the cause referenced above who has indicated he does not object to this motion 

and has signed the same.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court grant 

this Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other and further 

relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

ALLEN W. ROSS

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 528

Jacksonville, Texas 75766

903.683-2454 (voice)

866.576-5317 (fax)

allen@arossatty.com

By:____________________________________

ALLEN W. ROSS

State Bar No. 00788324

Attorney for JUSTIN CHRISTIAN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on January 6, 2015 a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Cherokee 

County, Texas, by facsimile transmission to 903 683 2309.

_______________________________________

ALLEN W. ROSS
#### Arthur "Pete" MASON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 26, 1956.

■Denney & Landrum, Lexington, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Hugh L. Hollingsworth, Asst. Atty. Gen,, fpr appel-lee.

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

Only one ground for reversal is urged on this appeal from a judgment sentencing the appellant, Arthur .“Fete” Mason, to sixteen years in the penitentiary for rape — that the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to grant Mason a continuance.

The appellant, a World War I veteran, picked Up twelve year old Garna Lee Thompson and offered to drive her to school on the,morning of January 27, 1956, but took her out on the highway outside the City of' Mt. Vernon and allegedly raped her, threatening her .with death if she told anyone. He was seen by three high school boys with the child in his parked car, in broad daylight, on the public highway near the time and at the place where the child recounted the attack occurred. Mason was arrested, released On bail, indicted on March 21 and tried on March 28. He had no counsel the dáy of the trial, and it is a question whether he could affoid to employ one although there is some evidence that he was receiving a veteran’s pension.

■Despite-the .heinous nature of the crime of which appellant.. is charged and some technical deficiencies in the record presented oh appeal, we are impressed -with the fact that appellant was defended by counsel appointed by the court the very morning of the trial,.'although at least another week remained in the term of court. In such-cir*942cumstances appointed counsel, who had requested a continuance, had little or no opportunity to investigate .the case and prepare a defense if one were possible. Suph a practice ,was disapproved by this Court in Raisor v. Com., Ky,, 278 S.W.2d 635, and a new trial granted the appellant there. For the reasons therein stated, the conviction of Masón is set aside and the casé remanded for another trial. See, also, Woosley v. Com., Ky., 282 S.W.2d 625.

Judgment- reversed.

HOGG and CAMMACK, JJ., not sitting.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      FOR THE       FOR THE       FOR THE       FOR THE       FOR THE
                                      TWELVE        TWELVE        TWELVE        TWELVE        TWELVE
                                      MONTHS        MONTHS        MONTHS        MONTHS        MONTHS
                                       ENDED         ENDED         ENDED         ENDED         ENDED
                                    NOVEMBER 30   NOVEMBER 30   NOVEMBER 30   NOVEMBER 30   NOVEMBER 30
                                       1995          1996          1997          1998          1999
                                    -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Pre-tax earnings from continuing
  operations......................    $    78       $   309       $   593       $   847       $ 1,013
Add: Fixed charges (excluding
     capitalized interest)........      9,980        10,140        12,233        14,746        12,552
                                      -------       -------       -------       -------       -------
Pre-tax earnings before
  fixed charges...................     10,058        10,449        12,826        15,593        13,565
                                      =======       =======       =======       =======       =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest........................      9,954        10,121        12,216        14,730        12,535
  Other(a)........................         27            25            19            20            17
                                      -------       -------       -------       -------       -------
  Total fixed charges.............    $ 9,981       $10,146       $12,235       $14,750       $12,552
                                      =======       =======       =======       =======       =======
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
  FIXED CHARGES...................       1.01          1.03          1.05          1.06          1.08
</TABLE>

------------------------

(a) Other fixed charges consist of the interest factor in rentals and
    capitalized interest.
Exhibit 32.1   Wings & Things, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 10, 2007 /s/ Linda L. Perry Linda L. Perry Principal Executive officer Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
     I, Stephen R. Jeuck, certify that:         1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofSouthern Community Bancorp (the “Issuer”);         2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;         3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;         4.  The Issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theIssuer and have:      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Issuer’smost recently completed fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and         5.  The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have significant role in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2004
/s/ Stephen R. Jeuck
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands** | 6 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flow [Abstract]**                               |           |   |
| Debt component of allowance for funds used during construction                    | $ 1,613        | $ 1,543 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfCashFlowsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Debt component of allowance for funds used during construction
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtr_DebtComponentOfAllowanceForFundsUsedDuringConstruction**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
#### PEOPLE’S BANK *v.*JAMES A. MILLER, JR., ET AL.

(14851)

Foti, Heiman and Schaller, Js.

Argued February 29

decision released March 26, 1996

*948
      *James A. Miller, Jr.,*pro se, with whom, on the brief, was *Joyce R. Miller,*pro se, the appellants (named defendant et al.).

*David Doyle,*with whom, on the brief, was *Mary E. Wexler,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Deep Down, Inc. (“Deep Down”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), the undersigned, Ronald E. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deep Down, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deep Down.





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Deep Down and will be retained by Deep Down and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:          November 19, 2010





/s/ RONALD E. SMITH


Ronald E. Smith


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Digicorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William B. Horne,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




April
              17, 2007
            
            /s/ William
              B. HorneWilliam B. Horne
              Chief Financial
                Officer