alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EPA Clean Power Plan Hearing 29 July 2014

Good morning. I am Edward Leaver, a physicist speaking as a private citizen. I wish to thank Pam Gant, Lisa, and EPA for hosting these hearings. I unequivacobly support EPA's Clean Power Plan to reign in carbon dioxide emissions. The cause of limiting Global Warming is not lost.
1. Yet "Global energy consumption will double by mid-century, regardless of what the United States does. Not from the 1 billion people already using vast amounts of electricity, or the 1 billion using modest amounts of electricity. But from the 1.6 billion people that do not have any access to electricity whatsoever, the 2.4 billion that have almost no access to electricity... and the 3 billion new people that will be born by mid-century who will need electricity."
2. Green house gas emissions too are a global problem. Limiting domestic emissions will be of no consequence if we continue to increase fossil fuel exports abroad. We continue to lease public coal from public lands. Yet we freely give much of it away to be burnt, not here but in Europe and Asia, thus encouraging our neighbors to neglect their own clean air responsibilities.
3. Even domestically we have no long-term low-enough carbon plan to economically replace coal as a dispatchable and reliable power source. Numerous studies including EPA's — have shown Wind+Solar+Gas alone will not, by themselves and at reasonable cost, decrease power-sector carbon emissions to the near-zero level required by mid-century. And its a global problem. Coal is ubiquitous, easy to mine and transport, and fossil power plants are comparatively simple to build at reasonable cost. The global power problem is staggering, and coal is the simplest solution. If we — the United States — do not exert leadership and demonstrate and implement low-carbon power solutions that are globally applicable, the rest of the globe will continue to apply coaL We can do better and we must do better. EPA Clean Power Plan represents a regulatory approach which, while a necessary and welcome first step, is hardly the last word. Senator Michael Bennett has called for development of a Comprehensive National Energy Plan to take optimal advantage of all low-carbon energy sources. Germany has one. Britain has one. France had one. We, the world's second largest energy producer and source of green house gas, need a Comprehensive National Plan as well. One that adds up. I ask we all support Senator Bennett's efforts to formulate one, and again support EPA's Clean Power Plan as a critical step in that direction. Thank you.

Notes: I will not repeat AGW arguments here. I've posted a concise review on my personal web page http:///www.edleaver.corn. What is Our energy Future? http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/05/13/what-is-our-energy- future/ Citizen's Climate Lobby has put forward an agressive Fee and Dividend proposal that would tax all carbon sources at point of extraction, and immediately return the proceeds to American households by monthly check or direct deposit: http://citizensciimatelobby.org/
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

   We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Celestial
Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 1999 and
1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999,
and have issued our report thereon dated November 3, 1999; such consolidated
financial statements and report are included in your 1999 Annual Report to
Stockholders and are included herein. Our audits also included the
consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company, listed in Item 14.
This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

Deloitte & Touche llp
Denver, Colorado
November 3, 1999

                                       1
#### Esidro CASTILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27871.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

No appearance for appellant. '

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the ’State. '•

PER CURIAM.

tr> *cl*S-3 7⁄8 £ O.h*. O c/a g *c+*5 *Cl*n> c6 nJ „ 1⁄8 B- 7⁄8) 5’ p c: cfq £. 1⁄8 nf •"3 7⁄8 g. B o *CL*co £ ■ d *Cl*ja '<5 O IT a *-r rt> hJ ^ S-P

The. recor.d on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of . exception. AIT proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony N. DeMint, certify that:

> 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form	10-QSB of Tell-A-Tale Incorporated;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this	quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or	omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in	light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not	misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial	statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly	report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,	results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and	for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I am the sole officer and director	and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls	and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))	for the small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,		or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under		my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the		small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made		known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the		period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business		issuer disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report		my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on		such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that		occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter		(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an		annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to		materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over		financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most	recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small	business issuer's auditors of the small business issuer's board of directors	(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material		weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial		reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small		business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report		financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves		management or other employees who have a significant role in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2005

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                     

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.




Date: September 15, 2010
By:  /s/ Thomas V. GeimerThomas V. Geimer,Chief Executive Officer,and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 13261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03754]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 13261]]

                Memorandum of February 16, 2024

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 1230 of the 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of Defense[, and] the Attorney General

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of 
                Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State 
                and, as appropriate, the Attorney General, the 
                authority to transmit to certain congressional 
                committees the report required by section 1230 of the 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 
                (Public Law 118-31).

                The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any 
                provision of any future public law that is the same or 
                substantially the same as the provision referenced in 
                this memorandum.

                The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 16, 2024

[FR Doc. 2024-03754
Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 6001-FR-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc.
(the Company), each certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. HedrickChief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2006/s/ David B. DechantDavid B. DechantChief Financial OfficerDate: May 15, 2006
Exhibit 10.13
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION
   W I T N E S S E T H
 Grant




---



##### 



Vesting
 Term
 Termination of Employment or Service
 Sale or Reorganization
 Method of Exercise and Payment
 Method of Exercise
 Taxes
 -2-




---



##### 



National Insurance Contributions
 Partial Exercise
 Transfers
 Adjustments on Changes in Common Stock
 -3-




---



##### 



Legal Requirements
 Listing Requirements
 Securities Laws
 Administration
 Rights as Stockholder
 Continued Employment or Service
 Sale of Option Shares
 Notices
 -4-




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 Counterparts
  OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Name:Title:ACCEPTED BY (OPTIONEE):Name: [EMPLOYEE NAME]Date:
 -5-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 19, 2014

t0916

Order 

Clerk

September 19, 2014

149047 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149047

COA: 319913

Ingham CC: 13-000362-FH

LINDSEY LYNN KONOPKA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue and file supplemental brief is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014 order of the Court 

of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of whether the 

circuit court improperly imposed court costs, in light of our decision in People v 

Cunningham, 496 Mich 145 (2014), and if so, whether the circuit court’s assessment of 

$500 in “court costs” constitutes plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights. 

Contrast People v Franklin, 491 Mich 916 (2012), with Johnson v United States, 520 US 

461, 467-468 (1997).

We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to the fact that we have also remanded 

People v Holbrook (Docket No. 149005) to the Court of Appeals for consideration of 

similar issues. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         680,686
<SECURITIES>                                 2,144,545
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,123,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,436,899
<PP&E>                                       2,246,656
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,791,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,171,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          955,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,477
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,089,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,171,064
<SALES>                                      3,316,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,476,755
<CGS>                                        1,320,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,576,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               341,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,051
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,811,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,811,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,811,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
        




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Paving Stone
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Maurice F. Sigouin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C.   1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Form  10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Form  10-Q fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                    /s/ Maurice F. Sigouin
                                    -----------------------
                                    Maurice F. Sigouin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Daniel V. Santi, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  |                                     
|                     |  | /s/ Daniel V. Santi                 
|                     |  | Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D.        
|                     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1305 

To prohibit Members of Congress, including the Delegates and the Resident 

Commissioner to the Congress, and the President from receiving pay 

during Government shutdowns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Mr. SHULER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit Members of Congress, including the Delegates 

and the Resident Commissioner to the Congress, and 

the President from receiving pay during Government 

shutdowns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PAY DURING GOVERNMENT 

4 SHUTDOWNS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Members of Congress and the 

6 President shall not receive basic pay for any period in 

7 which— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1305 IH

1 (1) there is more than a 24-hour lapse in ap2 propriations for any Federal agency or department 

3 as a result of a failure to enact a regular appropria4 tions bill or continuing resolution; or 

5 (2) the Federal Government is unable to make 

6 payments or meet obligations because the public 

7 debt limit under section 3101 of title 31, United 

8 States Code, has been reached. 

9 (b) RETROACTIVE PAY PROHIBITED.—No pay for10 feited in accordance with subsection (a) may be paid retro11 actively. 

12 (c) COVERAGE OF DELEGATES AND RESIDENT COM13 MISSIONER.—For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘Member 

14 of Congress’’ includes a Delegate or Resident Commis15 sioner to the Congress. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS