alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,478)
<INVENTORY>                                     63,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,752
<PP&E>                                         703,552
<DEPRECIATION>                               (375,371)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 724,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,971
<BONDS>                                        278,309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           683
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   724,823
<SALES>                                      1,005,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,007,354
<CGS>                                          849,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  940,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,491
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,964
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,964
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99 (b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interphase Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Steven P. Kovac,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Steven P. Kovac



Steven P. Kovac
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: August 4, 2004         /s/ Linda L. Perry
                              _____________________________________________
                              Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1782 

To implement the recommendations of the report of the Government Accountability Office entitled ‘‘Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication 

in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. MCCOTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To implement the recommendations of the report of the 

Government Accountability Office entitled ‘‘Opportunities 

to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF GAO REPORT TO RE4 DUCE DUPLICATION IN GOVERNMENT PRO5 GRAMS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later 

7 than 150 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1782 IH

1 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

2 shall coordinate with the heads of the relevant department 

3 and agencies to— 

4 (1) use available administrative authority to 

5 eliminate, consolidate, or streamline Government 

6 programs and agencies with duplicative and overlap7 ping missions identified in the March 2011 Govern8 ment Accountability Office report to Congress enti9 tled ‘‘Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication 

10 in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and 

11 Enhance Revenue’’ (GAO–11–318SP) and apply the 

12 savings towards deficit reduction; 

13 (2) identify and report to Congress any legisla14 tive changes required to further eliminate, consoli15 date, or streamline Government programs and agen16 cies with duplicative and overlapping missions identi17 fied in the March 2011 Government Accountability 

18 Office report to Congress entitled ‘‘Opportunities to 

19 Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Pro20 grams, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue’’ 

21 (GAO–11-318SP); 

22 (3) determine the total cost savings that shall 

23 result to each agency, office, and department from 

24 the actions described in subsection (1); and 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1782 IH

1 (4) rescind from the appropriate accounts the 

2 amount greater of— 

3 (A) $5,000,000,000; or 

4 (B) the total amount of cost savings esti5 mated by paragraph (3). 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-4189

___________ Charles E. Duchek, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Ethyl Corporation, a corporation; * Ethyl Petroleum Additives, Inc., a * [UNPUBLISHED] corporation; Barry Abrahamson, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 15, 1999 Filed: November 12, 1999

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles E. Duchek appeals the portion of the district court’s order dismissing, upon removal, various state law claims. The corporate appellees concede that, given the district court’s ruling that diversity of citizenship was lacking, the court was precludedfrom dismissing the claims against them before remanding the case to state court. We now vacate the dismissal portion of the district court’s order because it was rendered without diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### -78.0 -77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 38.4 38.6 38.8 39.0 39.2 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

ALVERN C. WEED, 

Petitioner, 

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3122

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in consolidated Nos. DE1221090320-B-1, 

DE3330080490-B-2, and DE4324090086-B-2.

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

Before DYK, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Alvern C. Weed moves for reconsideration of the

court’s previous rejection of his petition for review.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) issued 

its final order on September 10, 2012. Mr. Weed’s representative received the order via electronic mail on SepCase: 13-3122 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2013
ALVERN WEED V. SSA 2

tember 10, 2012.* Mr. Weed’s petition was received by 

this court on May 20, 2013, 252 days after he received the 

Board’s final order. 

Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 

5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that 

“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the 

Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the 

Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (2012). This filing period 

is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. 

Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984); see 

also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement that cannot be waived).

Because Mr. Weed’s petition was not received within 

60 days of the date he received the Board’s decision, we 

must dismiss his petition as untimely. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Mr. Weed’s motion for reconsideration is denied, 

and his petition is dismissed. 

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs. 

* The regulation governing the dates for service of 

electronic documents at the Board states, in relevant part, 

“MSPB documents served electronically on registered efilers are deemed received on the date of electronic submission.” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.14(m)(2).

 

Case: 13-3122 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/18/2013
3 ALVERN WEED V. SSA

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk

s26

ISSUED AS MANDATE: July 18, 2013

Case: 13-3122 Document: 6 Page: 3 Filed: 07/18/2013
### TXZE 

## A~~OEZNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS

Honorable D. W. Burkhalter County

Attorney Throokmorton

County Throolanorton,

Texas Dear Sirs OpiaionNo. 04874 Ret Authority of Cordrsionerr’ Court to pay for speoialelectioaia orderthat v&errsmay decidewhether county shouldemploy trapper, etc. Your requettfor our oplaioaia the above captioned matter has beea re+ oeived,

and m quota from your letteras folloasr "The CwaniasionersC ourt of this oouatyhas ordsro&ma eleotion to be held on the 15th day of April, 1944, to dotemire nhother or not the voters of the ooqty desire the oonmissionsrs* court to employ trappers to trap predatory animals inthis county. 'And the question

has arireaamong 8cm of *ihe oonmiesionere

a8 to whether or not they are authoriesd, or have the authority, to pay for the holdingof such an election,

out of the General FUds of the oouaty~ and "Also whether or mot, in the wart the elsotionshouldaamy, or be ia favor of employing

such trappers,

whether or not thrgwould be authorized or have the authority~to

employ such trapper+, and pay them out of the GeneralFunds of the oouaty." After a carefulstudy of the statutes, we find no provisionsauthoriziag the oomissioaers' oourt of Throc!mortoa Countyto call a speoial eleotioa in order

that the votersmay decide whether the oouxtty shall employ a trapper to trap predatory

aaimals in said omaty. Siaoe the oomnisaioners' oourtdoes not have authority to call the above descritid eleotiom,

it muat neoessarily follow that said body does not have the authority to pay for such am election.

mare saolosiag

a copy of OpinionIVo. O-2709 wri$tarby this department which we fell fully covers the powero of a o&ssioaere court to employ and pay a ooumtytrapperfor his semioes. very truly yours, JCD:db:eg* EnClOSlUYI ATl ’ ORBEy GENERU OF TEXAS AFPROVRD

VU2 27, 1944 /a/ Gee. P. inackburn (Acting) A.'TORNNY

GENERALOF TEXA2 By /s/ J, C. Davis, Jr. Assi staat
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino-Biotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Sole Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino-Biotics, Inc., and will be retained by Sino-Biotics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    /s/   David Lennox David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Sole Director   Date:  February 19, 2008
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21


  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                    ----------------------

<S>                                                   <C>
McRae Office Solutions, Inc.                          North Carolina

Rae-Print Packaging, Inc.                             North Carolina

Compsee, Inc. (99% ownership)                         North Carolina

Hoke Development Company, Inc.                        North Carolina

McRae Boot, Inc.                                      North Carolina

DataScan Corporation                                  South Carolina

System Integrators Plus, Inc.                         North Carolina

American West Trading Company                         Tennessee
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6277
LYNN HATCHER SANDERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-354-R) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lynn Hatcher Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and denying her "motio n . . . for release on parole." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Warden, Va. Correctional Ctr. for Women , No. CA97-354-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1   Wings & Things, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wings & Things, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wings & Things, Inc. Date: November 7, 2008/s/ Greg Popp
Greg Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
December 1 5 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Document Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: Access Geographic, LLC Petition to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 13932 , Docket No . FAA

- 2015

- 4284

- 0001

Dear Sir or Madam:

Access Geographic, LLC petitions to amend its 333 Exemption (No. 13932) to include the following small Unmanned Aerial Sy stems (sUAS): DJI Inspire 1 and 3D Robotics X8

- M

.
These additional systems will allow Access Geographic, LLC improved flexibility to acquire geospatial information in various environments and conditions.

All operations of these aircraft will continue to be in accordance with the exemption previously granted.

Respectfully Submitted,

ACCESS GEOG RAPHIC, LLC

Robert C. Moore Principal Geographer ( FAA Pilot Certification #3557232 )

Phone: (480) 709

- 2710 Email: rmoore@accessgeographic.com

Attachments: Inspire 1 User Manual v1.8 Inspire 1 Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer v1.2 Inspire 1 Maintenance Manual v1 3D	Robotics	X8

- M	Operation	Manual v3
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1658 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward Adams Department of Veterans 

Affairs Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. TIPTON (for himself, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. POLIS, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, and Mr. PERLMUTTER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

in Craig, Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward 

Adams Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 TELEHEALTH CLINIC, CRAIG, COLORADO. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

6 in Craig, Colorado, shall after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Wil8 liam Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs ClinVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:18 Apr 22, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1658.IH H1658

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1658 IH

1 ic’’. Any reference to such clinic in any law, regulation, 

2 map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

3 States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Major 

4 William Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs 

5 Clinic’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS