alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20884

Summary Calendar

ALEXANDER PERVYSHEV

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

INC INTERORIENT NAVIGATION HAMBURG GMBH & CO. KG

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

4:07-CV-02770

Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alexander Pervyshev, a Russian citizen, signed an employment contract

in Russia with INC Hamburg, a German corporation. Pervyshev agreed to work

aboard the M/V Candock III, and Hamburg flew Pervyshev to Houston, Texas

to board the ship. Pervyshev was injured while cargo was being unloaded from

the Candock while docked at Barranquilla, Columbia. A Columbian company

was operating the crane offloading the cargo.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 13, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20884

2

The district court dismissed Pervyshev’s claim on the basis that the court

lacked personal jurisdiction over INC Hamburg. The district court, in its well

stated Order and Judgment dated October 31, 2007, properly concluded that

personal jurisdiction did not exist over INC Hamburg. We AFFIRM.
June 10, 2015

Mr. Timothy Foster Aerial Video & Photography

9257 Sharon Street Juneau, AK 99801

Dear Mr. Foster:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 20, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1821), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT
Aug. 14, 2012 Report Request ID: 1012172 Report Code: AMP480

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 023 0004 88101 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA MERGE PDF FILES QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE WORKFILE DELIMITER SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING Option Type Option Value STREET ADDRESS YES NO

, EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS GLOBAL DATES

2011 Start Date End Date 2011 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description PM25 24-hour 2006 PM25 Annual 2006UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Aug. 14, 2012

Notes:1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis. 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 1 of 2UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Aug. 14, 2012

Notes:1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis. 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 2 of 2 

### Pollutant: Standard Units: NAAQS Standard: Statistic: Statistic: Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101) Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105) PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006 Annual Weighted Mean Annual 98th Percentile Level: Level: Design Value Year: 2011

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS. 15 35 State Name: Arizona
Site_ID / STREET ADDRESS | | | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs Wtd.

Mean 98th Perctil Cert.| | | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs 98th Perctil Wtd.

Mean Cert. |

| | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs 98th Perctil Wtd.

Mean Cert. |

| |Design Value Valid

Ind. | | | Design Value Valid

Ind. 24-Hour Annual 2011 2010 2009

04-023-0004 300 N MORLEY AVE 61 4 27.2 9.9 N 60 4 31.6 10.2 N 61 4 29.7 13.2 N 30 Y 11.1 Y
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and  (b)  of  Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the  undersigned  officers of Nova International Films, Inc. (the Company), does
hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

     The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with the
requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and  information  contained  in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2003                        /s/ Gao Wanjun
                                               -------------------------
                                               Gao Wanjun
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2003                        /s/  Wang  Yufei
                                               -------------------------
                                               Wang  Yu  fei
                                               Chief  Financial  Officer


                                       16
<PAGE>
TERMINATION
AGREEMENT


 


THIS
TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 13 day of February 2019 by and among Novomic Ltd.,
with principal offices at 23 Ha’ melacha St., Rosh-Haayin, Israel (the “Company”), and Doron Biran (the
“Service Provider”)


 


WHEREAS,
in June 2018, the Company and Service Provider entered in that certain Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Service Provider wish to terminate the Services Agreement as of February 15, 2019;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Servicers Agreement, the Company and Service Provider agree that the Services
Agreement shall be terminated as of February 15, 2019.


 


2.
Upon termination of the Services Agreement:


 


	 	a.	The Company shall pay the Service Provider the consideration
due to him in accordance with the Services rendered by him until the date of such termination in the amount of NIS 34,821, plus
VAT if applicable. Such payment shall be made until February 28, 2019; and
	 	 	 
	 	b.	The Service Provider shall cooperate with the Company
in order to transfer any matter related to the Services Agreement.




 


3.
The Service Provider agrees to fulfill his confidentiality and non-competition undertakings contained in the Services Agreement.


 


4.
Each party hereby releases and forever discharges the other party from any and all claims, demands, rights, obligations, damages
and liabilities of any nature whatsoever whether or not now known, suspected or claimed, which such party ever had, now has, or
may claim to have against the other party in connection with the Services Agreement and the termination of this relationship.


 


5.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Israel, without regard to the conflict
of laws provisions thereof. Any dispute arising under or in relation to this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively in the
competent court in Tel Aviv-Jaffa, and each of the parties hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such court.


 


6.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors, permitted assigns, heirs, executors,
and administrators of the parties hereto.


 


[the
rest of this page is intentionally left blank]


 




    	 		 



    	 	-2-	 



    


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Agreement as of the date first hereinabove set forth.


 


	Novomic
    Ltd.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Doron
    Biran	 
	 	 	 
	By;	/s/
    Doron Biran
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1445 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1445

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm 
                     ammunition or fishing tackle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2011

Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, Mr. 
    Altmire, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Rehberg, Ms. 
  Jenkins, and Mr. Miller of Florida) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm 
                     ammunition or fishing tackle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIREARM AMMUNITION AND FISHING TACKLE.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may not 
prohibit, limit, or control, based on material composition, any type of 
firearm ammunition or fishing tackle.
                                 <all>
```
Writ of Mandamus Dismissed, Opinion issued 1)ecember 12, 2012

Iii The

(!nitrt uf Apprah5

fifth Jitrict uf cxa at Ja1ta

No. 05-12-01335-CV

IN RE TIMOTHY SHELTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 282nd Judicial l)istrict Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F93-04758-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Beibre Justices Morris, Richter, and Lang-Miers

Opinion by Justice Morris

Relator contends the trial court failed to act on his motion fOr I)NA testing and appointment

of counsel. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.

The relief requested by relator has been granted. Therefore. the issues presented in this petition are

moot. See Dow Chern. Co. v. Garcia, 909 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding). In re

Gill. No. 06-04-00090-CV. 2004 WL 1884498 at * 1 (Tex. App.—iexarkana Aug. 24. 2004. orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

JOSIl B. 1ORRIS

JLJS’fICE

121335F.P05
**EXHIBIT 32.2****OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. § 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K/A forthe year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael G. Atieh, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Michael G. Atieh       Michael G. Atieh     Executive Vice President and Chief
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Annual Report of McRae Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Marvin G. Kiser, Sr., Vice President of Finance of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. /s/ Marvin G. Kiser, Sr.  
 50
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(b)



AMENDMENT NO. 9
TO
ACUITY BRANDS, INC
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of the 29th day of March, 2019, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and RICHARD K. REECE (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2006 (“Severance Agreement”), and amended as of October 28, 2009, March 30, 2010, March 28, 2014, October 27, 2014, October 26, 2015, October 25, 2016, October 25, 2017 and January 4, 2019, providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 2.11 is hereby replaced in its entirety by the following:


 2.11    “Severance Period” - A period equal to eighteen (18) months from the Executive’s Date of Termination.    
		
	2.
	This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.




	
				
	 
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
	 
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

	/s/ Richard K. Reece
	 
	By:  
	
/s/ Vernon J. Nagel

	RICHARD K. REECE
	 
	 
	VERNON J. NAGEL

	 
	 
	 
	Chairman, President and CEO
Exhibit 32.1   IDI Global, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDI Global, Inc., on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: December 11, 2008  /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1799 

To prohibit the disposal of Department of Veterans Affairs land and 

improvements at St. Albans campus. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2011 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the disposal of Department of Veterans Affairs 

land and improvements at St. Albans campus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘St. Albans VA Veteran 

5 Cares Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISPOSAL OF DEPARTMENT OF 

7 VETERANS AFFAIRS LAND AND IMPROVE8 MENTS AT ST. ALBANS CAMPUS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

10 may not declare as excess to the needs of the Department 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1799 IH

1 of Veterans Affairs or otherwise take any action to ex2 change, trade, auction, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, 

3 or reduce the acreage of, Federal land and improvements 

4 at the St. Albans campus, consisting of approximately 55 

5 acres of land, with borders near Linden Boulevard on the 

6 northwest, 115th Avenue on the west, the Long Island 

7 Railroad on the northeast, and Baisley Boulevard on the 

8 southeast. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 8162(c)(1) 

10 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

11 ‘‘, section 2(a) of the St. Albans VA Veteran Cares Act 

12 of 2011,’’ after ‘‘section 421(b)(2) of the Veterans’ Bene13 fits and Services Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–322; 102 

14 Stat. 553)’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
FecEx 

Express 

John E. Ellington 

Sr. Manager Quality Control 

Chief Inspector, FDER140A 

7401 World Way West, 

Los Angeles, CA. 90045 

Ph. 310-568-7451 

E-mail: john.ellington@fedex.com 

FedEx Quality Control/lAX 

7401 World Way West 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone 310.568.7451 

Fax 310.568.7433 

Date: March 17, 2016 

Re: Request Exemption (Extension) Pursuant to Section 145.103(b) of the CFR 

On September 2, 2014 Fed Ex Repair Station FDER140A petitioned for, and was granted a temporary exemption from 14 

CFR 145.103(b). Fed Ex Repair Station FDER140A respectfully requests an extension of this exemption for an additional two 

(2) years. 14 CFR 145.103(b) prescribes that "a certificated repair station with an airframe rating must provide suitable 

permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed on its operations specifications". 

Currently, Fed Ex holds Airframe Class Ratings 2 and 4. These ratings allow maintenance to be performed on all large 

aircraft over 12,500 pounds. Therefore, our operation specifications do not list aircraft by type and model. 

Fed Ex Repair Station FDER140A is headquartered at 7401 World Way West, LAX, where management and technical 

support staff are domiciled. Both Fed Ex and Flying Tigers have performed maintenance on large aircraft at the LAX Hangar 

location since 1965, with no adverse effects. The Southern California environment and climate are very favorable and have 

been found to pose no tangible risk to safety of personnel or maintenance operations. In the event of severe weather 

conditions, Fed Ex takes precautions to mitigate risk, inspects all areas of the aircraft prior to closing and corrects all 

discrepancies prior to closing. The LAX hangar is staffed with 24/7 security officers and is equipped with video surveillance 

systems throughout. 

Future potential exists for maintenance/modification of aircraft inside the LAX hangar, along with current contracts to 

modify foreign government aircraft. Due to the foreign government's security requirements; the aircraft will be modified 

in a hangar where the aircraft is totally enclosed and not visible to the public. 

Previous cases referenced in DOT/FAA Regulatory Dockets FAA-2009-0249 and FAA-2004-18105 demonstrated 

precedence for exemption in areas where climate is found to be conducive to safe operations. An extended grant of 

exemption would be in the best interest of the public and U.S. government as it would allow Fed Ex to continue to provide 

repair station services to the public, U.S. government, and foreign government aircraft. 

In consideration of climate conditions at LAX, and the grants of exemption in the aforementioned dockets, Fed Ex feels 

that an extension of exemption is founded. 

Your consideration and approval of this extension request would be greatly appreciated. Fed Ex looks forward to 

maintaining a strong working relationship with the Federal Aviation Agency. Please, do not hesitate to contact us with any 

questions, concerns, or requests that you may have. 

Regards, ) -~ r-£/LT -:--- ... ~{::;, ""'-' 

~hn E. Ellington .
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135319 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ELVA JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135319 COA: 277685 WCAC: 06-000062 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 10.5


 


Loans Extension Confirmation Letter


 


Reference is made
to the loans from Ms. Heung Mei Tsui to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), the principal and accumulated
interest totaled USD1,354,567 and USD98,395.27 respectively as of December 31, 2018. Due to the fact the Company temporarily did
not have enough balance in its oversea account to repay the loans, both Ms. Tsui and the Company agreed to extend the loans to
December 31, 2019, by which date the Company shall repay the principal and accumulated interest.


 


	Creditor: 	/s/ Heung Mei Tsui	 



 


	 	Debtor:	China Pharma Holdings, Inc.



 


	 	By:	/s/ Zhilin Li, President & CEO