alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 30, 2015

Hon. Laura Hinojosa

District Clerk

100 N Closner

- 1st Floor Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00219

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. C

- 1402

- 05

- I Style: LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. NOE PORTILLO

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was REVERSED & RENDERED by

this Court on the 9 th day of October, 2014. The mandate is enclosed.

No costs are assessed against the appellant

.

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code , the attorneys of record are hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be destroyed three (3) years after fina l disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the

Court.



### Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: John D. Charbonnet Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Kathryn Blair Craddock (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
#### Noe C. FLORES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28852.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 6, 1957.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal April 10, 1957.

William Lawrence Scarborough, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, 'for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction' is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the -punishment, one year in jail and a fine of $250.

It is recited in the information that the , same. is presented upon the written affidavit of Howard Edwards but the affidavit mentioned is not found in the record. Before the case may be considered by this Court, the affidavit upon which the information is based must appear in the record. Justice v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 299, 115 S.W.2d 922.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court:'

On Appellant’s Motion- to -Reinstate Appeal

' PER CURIAM.

; ' The record has been perfected by. the filing of a supplemental transcript.

The motion to reinstate the. appeal is granted.

*915The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
1

InThe Matter Of: 

## SERVED JUNE 27,2012 U.S. 

### DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2012-0020 BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC, Case No. 2011 EA 170024 

### l 

## 28

Respondent ) ) ) ) )


### ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF RULE 16 LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
On Apri123, 2012 an Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference and DirectingRule 26(f) Planning and Submissionwas ftled. Among otherthings, this Order directed the parties to file a Rule 26(f) Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan on orbefore June 20, 2012. OnJune 27, 2012 the parties filed a Rule 26(f) Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan.

I OnJune 27,2012,the parties appearedbytelephone for the scheduled Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and discussed their calendar availability, hearing dates, and other litigationprocedural matters. Among otherthings, the parties agreedthat it woulCl behelpful to continue the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for one month, to facilitate additional settlement and discovery discussions. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. §13.205(a)(1), (6) and (7), Civ. R. 16, 14 C.F.R. §13.217, and 14 C.F.R. §13.220, and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulation, statutory-authority, and being fully advised;



### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. TheRule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued by agreement ofthe parties. 2. The second Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference is set, by agreement ofthe parties, for 

### Monday, July 23,2012 at ll:OOam Eastern time. The Office of Hearings shall.initiate the conference call.

Page 

### 1of2SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001

Jason Dickstein, Respondent's Counsel Washington Aviation Group · 2233 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., #503 Washington, DC 20007 TEL: 202 628-6776 FAX: 202-628-8948 ONE COPY

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0020 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal AviationAdministration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite·2Wl000,Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.3; Prior to July 23, 2012, if the parties reach a settlement and wish to move to cancel the conference, they must file the necessary settlement withdrawal notice or other

necessary document(s) with the Office of Hearings. · an .in.iatfutive Law Judge Attachment - Service List Page 2 of2

\.
Exhibit



	
			
	 
	 
	EXHIBIT 10.46





                                                



                           




January 3, 2019




Chieh-Ju Tsai
c/o Lands’ End, Inc.
5 Lands’ End Lane
Dodgeville, WI 53595




Dear Chieh,


We are pleased to confirm the details of your promotion to Chief Product Officer, effective January 7, 2019. We all believe the future of Lands' End will provide us with many opportunities for growth and the company is well positioned for continued success.  By signing this letter, you are agreeing to the details of your promotion, as set forth below.


The following outlines the changes to your compensation package:


		
	•
	Annual base salary of $500,000 paid in bi-weekly payments. You will next be eligible for a merit review in May of 2020.




		
	•
	Your annual target bonus incentive opportunity for FY2019 will increase to 75% of your base salary.  The portion of the bonus target paid each year is based on your performance and the company’s fiscal results. 




		
	•
	Your annual target incentive opportunity under the Lands’ End Long-term Incentive Plan will increase to 100% of your base salary for FY2019. 




		
	•
	All aspects of this compensation package are subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Lands’ End Board of Directors.




		
	•
	As a condition of this promotion, you will be required to sign a new Executive Severance Agreement (ESA).  While the terms and conditions of the ESA will govern, here is a summary of some of the items covered by the ESA:  If your employment with Lands’ End is terminated by Lands’ End (other than for Cause, death or Disability) or by you for Good Reason (all as defined in the ESA), you will eligible to receive twelve (12) months of salary continuation, equal to your base salary at the time of termination, reduced by any interim earnings you may otherwise receive. Under the ESA, you agree, among other things, not to disclose confidential information and, for eighteen (18) months following termination of employment, not to solicit our employees.  You also agree not to aid, assist or render services for any Competitive Business (as defined in the ESA) for twelve (12) months following termination of employment.  The non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-compete provisions apply regardless of whether you are eligible for severance benefits under the ESA. 




Chieh, we all think highly of you and believe there will be continued opportunity to leverage your knowledge, experience, and leadership as we pursue our vision of becoming a global lifestyle brand.  


	
					
	Sincerely,
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Jerome S Griffith
	 
	 
	/s/ Chieh-Ju Tsai
	 

	Jerome S Griffith
	 
	 
	Chieh-Ju Tsai
	 

	Chief Executive Officer and President
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1831 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 

the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2011 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FARR, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MORAN, Mr. NADLER, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. POLIS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. STARK, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. KUCINICH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Industrial Hemp 

5 Farming Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1831 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINI2 TION OF MARIHUANA. 

3 Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

4 U.S.C. 802) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (16)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘(16) The’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘(16)(A) The’’; and 

8 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include in10 dustrial hemp.’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(57) The term ‘industrial hemp’ means the 

13 plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, 

14 whether growing or not, with a delta-9 

15 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 

16 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION. 

18 Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

19 U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the fol20 lowing: 

21 ‘‘(i) INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION.—If a per22 son grows or processes Cannabis sativa L. for purposes 

23 of making industrial hemp in accordance with State law, 

24 the Cannabis sativa L. shall be deemed to meet the con25 centration limitation under section 102(57).’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, INc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

/s/ Brian T. Beckwith
-----------------------------------------
Brian T. Beckwith,
President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       53
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 8, 2007/s/ Linda L. Perry
Linda L. Perry
Principal Executive Officer
#### CRISTWOOD CONTRACTING, INC. *v.*CHRISTINE BADERA ET AL.

(14666)

O’Connell, Lavery and Landau, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 13

decision released March 5, 1996

*931
      *Leslee B. Hill*and *Robert A. Ziegler*filed a brief for the appellants (defendants).

*Lawrence G. Rosenthal*filed a brief for the appel-lee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Colin Goddard, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
                                                         /s/ COLIN GODDARD, PH.D.
                                               ---------------------------------------------
                                                           Colin Goddard, Ph.D.
                                                          Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 1, 2003
</Table>
Commodity 2006 Pounds Applied 2007 Pounds Applied 2008 Pounds Applied ALFALFA (FORAGE - FODDER) (ALFALFA HAY) 6 2 3 ALMOND 1788 1462 1191 APPLE 17 25 27 APRICOT 4 3 3 BARLEY (FORAGE - FODDER) 13 20 60 BARLEY, GENERAL 68 32 424 BEANS, DRIED-TYPE 19 39 16 BEANS, SUCCULENT (OTHER THAN LIMA) 8 6 BERMUDAGRASS (FORAGE - FODDER) 34 28 28 BLUEBERRY 14 14 11 CHERRY 140 201 100 CORN (FORAGE - FODDER) 587 535 477 CORN, FIELD, DENT (GRAIN CROP) 22 CORN, HUMAN CONSUMPTION 55 91 129 COTTON, GENERAL 1157 564 348 FORAGE - FODDER GRASSES (ALL OR UNSPEC) (H A 38 41 88 GARBANZOS (INCLUDING CHICK PEAS) 6 GRAPEFRUIT 15 12 5 GRAPES 145 190 224 GRAPES, WINE 263 367 727 KIWI FRUIT 4 1 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 462 349 376 LEMON 8 12 8 NECTARINE 34 28 31 N-OUTDR CONTAINER/FLD GRWN PLANTS 12 10 12 OATS (FORAGE - FODDER) 1341 1270 1567 OATS, GENERAL 228 229 296 OLIVE (ALL OR UNSPEC) 8 11 34 ORANGE (ALL OR UNSPEC) 181 175 145 ORNAMENTAL TURF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 33 33 34 PASTURES (ALL OR UNSPEC) 3 6 23 PEACH 90 79 84 PEAR 27 28 42 PEPPERS (FRUITING VEGETABLE), (BELL,CHILI, ETC 13 3 PISTACHIO (PISTACHE NUT) 128 225 240 PLUM (INCLUDES WILD PLUMS FOR HUMAN CONS U 54 136 43 POMEGRANATE (MISCELLANEOUS FRUIT) 14 399 186 POTATO (WHITE, IRISH, RED, RUSSET) 3 26 56 PRUNE 52 37 32 PUMPKIN 13 10 RANGELAND (ALL OR UNSPEC) 2 5 RASPBERRY (ALL OR UNSPEC) 9 RICE (ALL OR UNSPEC) 5358 2007 2091 

### Carfentrazone-ethyl (128712) Cal. DPR Usage Data

Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the

following table outlining the pounds of Carfentrazone-ethyl used in California over the three most recent years available (2006 - 2008).RICE, WILD (GRAIN CROP) 301 591 824 RIGHTS OF WAY 49 18 132 RYE (ALL OR UNSPEC) 2 10 RYEGRASS, PERENNIAL (FORAGE - FODDER) 30 31 SOIL APPLICATION, PREPLANT-OUTDOOR (SEEDB E 154 69 92 SORGHUM (FORAGE - FODDER) (SORGO, ETC.) 7 15 109 SORGHUM/MILO GENERAL 27 18 12 STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL 1 2 3 SUDANGRASS (FORAGE - FODDER) (SORGHUM SUDANESE) 5 10 SUGARBEET, GENERAL 2 2 SUNFLOWER, GENERAL 3 8 TANGELO 10 18 7 TANGERINE (MANDARIN, SATSUMA, MURCOTT, ETC 29 70 34 TOMATO 28 1 16 TOMATOES, FOR PROCESSING/CANNING 90 68 105 TRITICALE (GRAIN CROP) 7 22 37 UNCULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL AREAS (ALL OR U N 151 80 120 WALNUT (ENGLISH WALNUT, PERSIAN WALNUT) 292 256 226 WHEAT (FORAGE - FODDER) 1267 1236 1446 WHEAT, GENERAL 784 704 1122 Chemical Total 15612 11,928 13553 Date Prepared: 05/26/10 Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm Empty cells indicate no available usage.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc. (the
Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. HedrickChief Executive OfficerDate: February 14, 2006/s/ David B. DechantDavid B. DechantChief Financial OfficerDate: February 14, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-054-CV

JEANNA NICOLE ARNOLD APPELLANT AND APPELLEE

V.

MATTHEW PRICE APPELLEE AND APPELLANT

----------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellee’s Motion To Dismiss Cross Appeal,” filed by

Matthew Price. It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore,

we dismiss the cross-appeal of Matthew Price. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

Costs of the cross-appeal shall be paid by the appellee, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 15, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      3,926,100
<SECURITIES>                                  300,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  60,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,286,300
<PP&E>                                     36,919,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             13,081,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             28,137,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         850,700
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 26,766,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,074,600
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,356,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              184,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,389,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,389,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,389,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   24.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   24.65


</TABLE>