alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Miles McNEAL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28314.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 9, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

J. M. Kolander, County Atty., Robert L. Templeton, Asst. County Atty., Amarillo, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*920PER CURIAM.

The offense is procuring; the punishment, three months in jail and a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 21.1       List of Subsidiaries
                   --------------------

                                                  State in
                                                   Which
Subsidiaries of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.          Organized

 Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL)         Indiana

   Subsidiaries of IPL

     Property and Land Company, Inc.              Indiana
     Fort Ben Energy Management Corp.             Indiana
     IPL Funding Corporation                      Indiana

 Mid-America Capital Resources, Inc.              Indiana
    (Mid-America)

   Subsidiaries of Mid-America

     Indianaplis Campus Energy, Inc. (ICE)        Indiana
     Store Heat and Produce Energy, Inc. (SHAPE)  Indiana
     Mid-America Energy Resources, Inc.
       (Energy Resources)                         Indiana
     Cleveland Thermal Energy Corporation         Ohio
     Cleveland District Cooling Corporation       Ohio

   Both IPL and Mid-America are wholly owned by IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
Each of the subsidiaries listed for IPL and Mid-America is wholly 
owned except for SHAPE, which is 80% owned by Mid-America.  Both 
Cleveland Thermal Energy Corporation and Cleveland District Cooling
Corporation conduct business under the name Cleveland Energy Resources.
Exhibit 10.20

February 29, 2008

William J. Kelly

116
Riverside Drive

Norwell, MA 02061

Dear Bill,

It is my pleasure to submit to you this offer of employment with Repligen Corporation (the Company) as Vice President of Finance and Administration reporting
to the Chief Executive Officer. On behalf of the Company, I have set forth below the terms of your employment. This letter supersedes and cancels all prior oral and written negotiations, agreements and commitments.

Your salary will be $190,000 per year and you are eligible for a target bonus of 25% based on our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. You will receive a $5,000
sign-up bonus assuming your first day of employment is March 31, 2008 or earlier. You will be entitled to participate in any and all benefit programs that the Company establishes and makes available to its employees, including but not limited
to health and dental insurance and life insurance to the extent that you meet all eligibility requirements for participation. You will be entitled to four weeks of paid vacation per year.

We intend to grant you incentive stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock under the Companys 2001 Stock Option Plan at an exercise price to be set
at the closing price on the day of your first day of employment. These options will vest over a 5-year period from the grant date. You will also receive a grant of 5,000 shares of restricted Repligen stock which will vest one year from your first
day of employment.

Please understand that this is an offer letter and is not a contract of employment for a particular duration or period.

If you accept our offer, please sign below and return one copy to me on or before March 6, 2008. We look forward to having you join our company.

Regards,



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|Walter Herlihy  |  |                        
|President & CEO |  | Accepted: William Kelly
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         In connection with the Annual Report of National Home Health Care Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Steven
Fialkow,  Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2003


                                 /s/ Steven Fialkow
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Steven Fialkow
                                 Principal Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 24.1**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY(Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

 

The undersigned, anofficer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.,constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris and J. Michael Dodson, and each ofthem, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts andthings and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Companythe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 28, 2005 andany and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm allthat said attorneys and agents and each of them shall do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and mayexercise, all powers conferred.

 
| Dated: July 21,  2005. |                  |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------|
|                        |                  |
|                        | /s/ FREDERICK A. BALL |   |
|                        | Frederick A. Ball     |

 

----
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related
Prospectus of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation for the registration of 25,134,430 shares of its common stock and to the incorporation by
reference therein of our report dated March 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Phillips-Van Heusen
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 2, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





|New York, New York |                      
|------------------ | ---------------------
|September 18, 2003 | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
<PAGE>

                     KAISER VENTURES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556 and 333-17843) pertaining to the
Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources,
Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser
Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock
Plan, respectively, of Kaiser Ventures Inc. of our report dated January 25,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Kaiser Ventures Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                         ---------------------
                                         Ernst & Young LLP



Riverside, California
March 23, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,320
<SECURITIES>                                     9,366
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (238)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,551
<PP&E>                                          14,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,177
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,411
<SALES>                                         47,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,368
<CGS>                                           23,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">GVS Properties IV LLC, Petitioner-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Altagracia Marte and Osiris Marte, Respondents-Appellants.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Respondents appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kimon C. Thermos, J.), dated March 26, 2019, which granted landlord's cross motion for summary judgment of possession in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Appeal from order (Kimon C. Thermos, J.), dated March 26, 2019, deemed an appeal from the ensuing final judgment (same court and Judge), entered March 28, 2019, and so considered (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520[c]), final judgment affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Respondents, the adult children of the tenant of record, failed to raise any triable issue of fact with respect to their proffered succession defense. The record evidence conclusively established that in 2003, the tenant of record moved to a neighboring building that accepted her Section 8 voucher, but continued to execute (at least eight) renewal leases for the subject apartment through 2016 and continued to pay rent in her name. Thus, although the apartment was no longer tenant's primary residence after 2003, she cannot be found to have "permanently vacated" the apartment prior to the expiration of the last lease renewal on December 31, 2016 (<a href="../2019/2019_08132.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Matter of Well Done Realty, LLC v Epps</i>, 177 AD3d 427</a> [2019]; <a href="../2012/2012_00400.htm" target="_blank"><i>Third Lenox Terrace Assoc. v Edwards, </i>91 AD3d 532</a> [2012]). Given this chronology, and in the absence of any evidence tending to show that respondents "resided with" the tenant in the subject apartment during the two-year period immediately preceding the tenant's permanent vacatur (Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] ยง 2523.5[b][1]), respondents' succession claim must fail (<i>see Well Done Realty, LLC v Epps, </i>177 AD3d at 428<i>; Third Lenox Terrace Assoc. v Edwards</i>, 91 AD3d at 533).</p><p>Respondents' conclusory allegation that landlord had imputed knowledge that tenant had moved out was insufficient to raise a triable issue that landlord waived the right to contest respondents' occupancy, especially given tenant's continued involvement with the subject premises (<i>see Matter of Well Done Realty, LLC v Epps</i>, <a href="../2014/2014_51747.htm" target="_blank"><i>supra; 206 W. 104th St. LLC v Zapata</i>, 45 Misc 3d 135</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51747[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2014]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: January 29, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Theodore D. Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

GREAT BASIN UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514-3537 

September 11, 2012 

Mr. Patrick Au 

California Air Resources Board 

Stationary Source Division 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

760-872-8211 Fax: 760-872-6109 

Re: Adoption of District Rule 221 - PSD 

Dear Mr. Au: 

Concurrent with the District's submittal of the rule package sent to you on September 7, 2011 

regarding its adoption of Rule 221 - Prevention of Significant Deterioration, the District requests that 

the California Air Resources Board send Rule 221 for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan. 

Sincerely, 

Duane Ono 

Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-074X |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | L 66 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Leġiżlazzjoni | Volum 618 ta' Marzu 2018 |

ISSN 1977-074X

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

L 66

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Leġiżlazzjoni

Volum 618 ta' Marzu 2018

---

| Werrej | | Rettifika | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rettifika tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/302 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Frar 2018 dwar l-indirizzar tal-imblukkar ġeografiku mhux ġustifikat u forom oħrajn ta' diskriminazzjoni abbażi tan-nazzjonalità, tal-post tar-residenza jew tal-post tal-istabbiliment tal-klijenti fi ħdan is- suq intern u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 2006/2004 u (UE) 2017/2394 u d-Direttiva 2009/22/KE ( ĠU L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Rettifika

Paġna

*

Rettifika tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/302 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Frar 2018 dwar l-indirizzar tal-imblukkar ġeografiku mhux ġustifikat u forom oħrajn ta' diskriminazzjoni abbażi tan-nazzjonalità, tal-post tar-residenza jew tal-post tal-istabbiliment tal-klijenti fi ħdan is- suq intern u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 2006/2004 u (UE) 2017/2394 u d-Direttiva 2009/22/KE ( ĠU L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( ĠU L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| MT | L-Atti li t-titoli tagħhom huma stampati b'tipa ċara huma dawk li għandhom x'jaqsmu mal-maniġment ta' kuljum ta' materji agrikoli, u li ġeneralment huma validi għal perijodu limitat.
  It-titoli ta'l-atti l-oħra kollha huma stampati b'tipa skura u mmarkati b'asterisk quddiemhom. |
| --- | --- |

MT

L-Atti li t-titoli tagħhom huma stampati b'tipa ċara huma dawk li għandhom x'jaqsmu mal-maniġment ta' kuljum ta' materji agrikoli, u li ġeneralment huma validi għal perijodu limitat.

It-titoli ta'l-atti l-oħra kollha huma stampati b'tipa skura u mmarkati b'asterisk quddiemhom.

---

Rettifika

| 8.3.2018 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

L 66/1

---

Rettifika tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/302 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Frar 2018 dwar l-indirizzar tal-imblukkar ġeografiku mhux ġustifikat u forom oħrajn ta' diskriminazzjoni abbażi tan-nazzjonalità, tal-post tar-residenza jew tal-post tal-istabbiliment tal-klijenti fi ħdan is- suq intern u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 2006/2004 u (UE) 2017/2394 u d-Direttiva 2009/22/KE

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea L 60 I tat-2 ta' Marzu 2018
  )

Fil-paġna 14, fil-formula tal-għeluq,

minflok:

“
  Għall-Parlament Ewropew

Il-President

L. PAVLOVA

Għall-Kunsill

Il-President

A. TAJANI
  ”,

aqra:

“
  Għall-Parlament Ewropew

Il-President

A. TAJANI

Għall-Kunsill

Il-President

L. PAVLOVA
  ”.

---
#### Leslie JOHNSON, Appellant, v. *The*STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27490.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, five years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11214 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BARON ELDER, also known as Beno, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC Nos. 4:98-CV-1085-Y 4:96-CR-25-28-Y

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Baron Elder appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which challenged his conviction for conspiring to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute. He argues that his sentence is illegal under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and that the district court erred in denying him leave to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to add a claimNo. 00-11214 -2- pursuant to Apprendi . Elder’s argument is unavailing. Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. See United States v. Brown , 305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,069
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,417
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,296
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,421
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,374
<LOANS>                                        138,434
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,797)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,364
<DEPOSITS>                                     157,753
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,687
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,839
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 186,364
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,769
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  822
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,591
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,890
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,209
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,382
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      235
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,165
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       868
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,336
<LOANS-PAST>                                       827
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,601
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       51
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,797
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,797
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1(*)






Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
      Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection
      with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Subrah S. Iyar, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 9, 2005










/s/ SUBRAH
      S. IYAR


Subrah
      S.
      Iyar


Chief
      Executive Officer























































_____________________________






(*)
      In
      accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
      33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
      Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany
      this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether
      made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
      specifically incorporates it by reference.
































Form
            10-Q
            for quarter ended June 30, 2005
#### M. S. SKINNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27427.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal'contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.