alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 184

      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Tax Relief Guarantee Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET OF EXPANSION OF ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to section 202 of such Act (relating to 
expansion of adoption credit and adoption assistance programs).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Ryon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


May 14, 2004                                     /s/ David Ryon
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 David Ryon
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


_____________________________


FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934











Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


March 25, 2014








PVH CORP.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0757213-1166910(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York10016(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212)-381-3500


Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act


(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---










ITEM 2.02  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION


On March 25, 2014 , PVH Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release to report the Company’s earnings for the fourth quarter and full year 2013 , which is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1.


The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





ITEM 9.01  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d) Exhibits .


ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated March 25, 2014.











---




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





PVH CORP.





By: /s/ Bruce Goldstein


Bruce Goldstein


Senior Vice President and Controller





Date: March 25, 2014











---




Exhibit Index





ExhibitDescription99.1Press Release, dated March 25, 2014.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OTIS SALLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-17, CA-98-3612-5) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Otis Salley, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Glenn Chandler, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Otis Salley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Salley , Nos. CR-97-17; CA-98-3612-5 (D.S.C. July 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Public Hearing for



# 2012 Standards and 2013 Biomass-Based

Diesel Volume under the Renewable
Fuel Standard Program

July 12, 2011

Agenda

9:00 am EPA Opening Statement Paul Argyropoulos Office of Transporta tion and Air Quality

9:15 am Testimony from parties that pre-notified EPA

Order of witnesses:

R. Brooke Coleman AEC & RFA Greg Scott NPRA

Joe Jobe NBB Patrick Kelly API Jim Nussle Growth Energy

Glenn Johnston ABFA

Neville Fernandez Neste Oil

Ms. Sarah Thornton BIO Ramon M. Benavides GEN-X Energy Group, Inc. David Elsenbast Renewable Energy Group

Testimony from walk-ins

Hearing will adjourn when all parties have presented testimony
From: Rochon, Everette (FAA) 

Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:49 PM

To: 'Mike502B@aol.com'

Subject: Al's Aerial Spraying, LLC

Dear Mr. Schiffer

I’m sure you understand that the FAA has strict guidelines about pre-decisional discussions with 

petitioners due to ex-parte communication rules.

An ex parte contact is any communication between the FAA and a party outside the government related 

to a specific rulemaking (or exemption) proceeding, before that particular proceeding is finalized.

Please know that we are working diligently to provide an answer to your petition as quickly as possible.

If you have further questions on the status of your petition, please contact the FAA Office of 

Rulemaking.

Thank you.

Mr. Everette Rochon

Acting Manager, Commercial Operations Branch (AFS-820)

Flight Standards Service, General Aviation and Commercial Division

Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC

202-267-1142

____________________

From: Mike502B@aol.com [mailto:Mike502B@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 4:48 PM

To: Hemler, Joseph K Jr (FAA)

Subject: Al's Aerial Spraying, LLC

Mr. Hemler,

Federal, State, and County Contracts have been prepared and awarded. We are in the midst of 

preparing Congested Area Plans for ten FSDO's. I hope our request for exemption demonstrates that the 

level of safety is improved above that required through the use of our exemption. If you are close to a 

decision on our request could you provide some guidance concerning timing or a direction so we can 

finish preparing and submit additional congested area plans for this season?

Thank you for your consideration and time.

Michael Schiffer

Al's Aerial Spraying, LLC

989-834-5067
#### Ernesto OLIVAS, Appellant, v. Jesus BARAJAS, Appellee.

No. 12953.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 28, 1955.

*895Nicholas Doran, San Antonio, for appellant.

Ralph E. Cadwallader, San Antonio, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

Appellee, Jesus Barajas, recovered judgment against Ernesto Olivas in the amount of $66.50, $50 of which was for attorney’s fees. Appellee filed his suit in the County Court at Law and, except for his allegations that he was entitled to recover $200 attorney’s fees, the amount involved was within the jurisdiction of the Justice of the Peace Court.

Appellant excepted to the allegations concerning attorney’s fees. The Judge of the County Court overruled the exceptions. The judge, however, told appellant that he would extend him the right to prove that the attorney’s fees were alleged for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction upon the County Court. Appellant declined but insisted upon his exceptions. The case proceeded to trial, which lasted most of one day and was concluded the following day. Appellant failed to prove anything other than that, as a question of fact, the attorney’s fees were excessive.

> "A verified plea to the jurisdiction is essential, however, when the petition on its face states a claim within the court’s jurisdiction and the defendant contends that the allegations have been deliberately falsified to confer an ostensible jurisdiction upon a court which, in truth, lacks power over the controversy. This contention most frequently appears as a claim that the plaintiff has fraudulently exaggerated or minimized the amount in controversy or has fraudulently alleged a claim involving a particular subject matter within the court’s jurisdiction. The burden is upon the defendant to prove the allegations of such a plea. * * * The allegations of the petition are accepted as true for the purpose of determining jurisdiction unless they are challenged by a proper dilatory plea; plaintiff’s good faith in alleging • the subject matter of his claim can not be questioned by a special exception or a plea in bar.” 2 McDonald, Texas Civil Practice, § 7.07.

Attorney’s fees, under Art. 2226, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., are a part of the amount in controversy. Williamson v. Acosta, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 772; National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Runnels, Tex.Civ.App., 227 S.W.2d 351. See also, Johnson v. Universal Life & Accident Ins. Co., 127 Tex. 435, 94 S.W.2d 1145.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit31.2**

Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

I, Geoffrey M. Boyd,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|   | November 13, 2006 |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   | Sign:             |   /S/  Geoffrey  M. Boyd |   |
|   |              | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|   |              | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Michael Shaffer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.   Dated:  October 29, 2010


| |                                                                                         
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ MICHAEL SHAFFER
Michael Shaffer
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04161

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 04161\04161 Ash Calc Sheet.xlsx EPA Technical Review Notes

04161\04161_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

04161\04161_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 04161\04161_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 04161\04161_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04161\04161_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04161\04161_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04161\04161_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04161\04161_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04161\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\2009 Ash report.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 04161\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Plant property.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04161\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Water Balance Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### Charles BLEVINS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 11, 1955.

Dinkle & Fannin, Ashland, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Boyd Circuit Court by Charles Blevins from a judgment convicting him of the offense of possessing alcoholic and intoxicating beverages in local option territory for the purpose of sale and fixing his punishment at a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for a period of 30 days.

A consideration of the record and of the points raised in appellant’s brief has failed to disclose any error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1   IDI Global, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDI Global, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Weatherly, a consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    1. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 21, 2006 /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith Chief Executive Officer     Date: August 21, 2006 /s/ Steven D. Weatherly Steven D. Weatherly Consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1





<PAGE>









                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Tofutti Brands Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Nos.  33-72654,  333-48605 and 333-79567) on Form S-8 of Tofutti Brands Inc. of
our report dated  February 20, 2001,  relating to the balance  sheets of Tofutti
Brands  Inc.  as of  December  30,  2000 and  January  1,  2000 and the  related
statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the
years then ended, which report appears in the December 30, 2000 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Tofutti Brands Inc.

                                                           /s/ Wiss & Company
                                                           WISS & COMPANY, LLP

Livingston, New Jersey
March 20, 2001
```

[Federal Register: June 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 107)]
[Notices]               
[Page 31761]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04jn10-39]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting of the Connecticut 
State Advisory Committee will convene at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 
22, 2010 at the University of Connecticut, School of Law, Faculty 
Lounge, 55 Elizabeth Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06105. The purpose 
of the meeting is to consider possible findings and recommendations on 
a draft report about school choice, high school attainment rates, and 
civil rights.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by July 22, 2010. The 
address is Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th St., NW., Washington, DC 
20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire 
additional information should contact the Eastern Regional Office at 
202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 28, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-13397 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
RECORD OF CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE PARTY TO 

DISCUSS ISSUES RELATED TO 

INFORMAL RULEMAKING

Th

AGENCY KEEPING 

RULEMAKING DOCKET

Employment and Training Administration/Office of 

Apprenticeship, Department of Labor

TITLE OF RULE Apprenticeship Programs; Equal Employment Opportunity, 

RIN 1205-AB59

STAGE OF RULEMAKING Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Issued, Comment Period Open

DATE OF DISCUSSION

January 19, 2016

NATURE OF DISCUSSION

PHONE MEETING EMAIL X 

Party(ies)/Title(s)/Organization(s) Present or Represented

NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION

Bill Irwin Executive Director, Carpenters International Training Fund

Department of Labor Representatives Participating

NAME TITLE

Adele Gagliardi Administrator, Office of Policy Development and Research, ETA

Description of Factual Materials or Information Presented

Outside parties sent an email message with a request for information regarding the percentage of 

apprentices in programs with less than five apprentices and the percentage of program with less than five 

apprentices. 

The Department provided an email directing the outside parties to the Economic Analysis of the NPRM, 

section 5.d. Alternatives, “Apply the same affirmative action policy to all sponsors regardless of size” on 

page 68944 of Federal Register of November 6, 2015 [80 FR 68907].
Order entered May 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00634-CR

PAUL CLARENCE BAILEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-81879-09

ORDER

The State’s May 17, 2013 motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED. The 

State’s brief is deemed filed May 17, 2013. 

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

PRESIDING JUSTICE