alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 5, 2017 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-00926-CV ELIZABETH LOPEZ, Appellant V. FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15085 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated August 8, 2017, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the a ppeal. Also by postcar d dated August 8, 2017, we informed appellant the docketing statement in th is case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated October 3, 2017, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid fo r the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had be en found entitled to proceed without payment of–2– costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant ha s not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

170926F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ELIZABETH LOPEZ, Appellant
No. 05-17-00926-CV V. FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15085. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERATED NA TIONAL INSURANCE recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ELIZABETH LOPEZ.
Judgment entered December 5, 2017.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”** )
      on Form
      10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the **“Report”** ),
      I, R.
      Dixon Thayer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      R.
      Dixon Thayer


R.
      Dixon
      Thayer


Chief
      Executive Officer





November
      9, 2005
# Diario Oficial C 340/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 340 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 59° año16 de septiembre de 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 340

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

59° año16 de septiembre de 2016

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Información |
| | INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
| | Parlamento EuropeoConsejo |
| 2016/C 340/01 | Declaración de la Comisión relativa al Reglamento (UE) 2016/1627 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 14 de septiembre de 2016, relativo a un plan de recuperación plurianual para el atún rojo del Atlántico oriental y el Mediterráneo y por el que se deroga el Reglamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 del Consejo | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

IV   Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Parlamento EuropeoConsejo

2016/C 340/01

Declaración de la Comisión relativa al Reglamento (UE) 2016/1627 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 14 de septiembre de 2016, relativo a un plan de recuperación plurianual para el atún rojo del Atlántico oriental y el Mediterráneo y por el que se deroga el Reglamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 del Consejo

o

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

IV Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Parlamento Europeo Consejo

| 16.9.2016 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 340/1

---

Declaración de la Comisión relativa al Reglamento (UE) 2016/1627 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 14 de septiembre de 2016, relativo a un plan de recuperación plurianual para el atún rojo del Atlántico oriental y el Mediterráneo y por el que se deroga el Reglamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 del Consejo (1)

(2016/C 340/01)

La Comisión manifiesta su preocupación por el hecho de que los poderes limitados que en ella han delegado los colegisladores pueden obstaculizar la aplicación a su debido tiempo de medidas que en el futuro adopte la CICAA para revisar o actualizar el sistema de control de esta organización.

La Comisión declara, por lo tanto, que considera que el presente Reglamento se entiende sin perjuicio de ninguna posición futura de la institución por lo que respecta al recurso a los artículos 290 y 291 TFUE en cuanto a la transposición de medidas de las organizaciones regionales de ordenación pesquera.

La Comisión, además, se reserva el derecho de proponer modificaciones del Reglamento destinadas a incrementar el número de medidas que deben adoptarse mediante actos delegados o de ejecución en caso de que la transposición mediante el procedimiento legislativo ordinario dé lugar a demoras que pongan en peligro la capacidad de la UE de cumplir sus obligaciones internacionales.

---

(1)  DO L 252 de 16.9.2016, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  I, Michael T. Everett, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WebEx Communications, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 9, 2004
 
 
 /s/ MICHAEL T. EVERETT
 Michael T. Everett
 Chief Financial Officer
#### Bascom GILES v. STATE.

No. 28016.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1956.

Small, Small & Craig, Austin, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin1 for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing to accept a bribe is the offense; the punishment, 6 years in the. penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
0 130 260 520 780 1,040

0 500 1,000

Miles 0 380

Miles

Legend

Eco reg io n s

Where "Other

Waters" are

Similarly

Situated

In dividual

An alysis o f

Sig n ifican t

Nexus

Great Lakes Alvars

Miles

.

No te: Fo r display purpo ses, the bo rders fo r eco reg io n s are displayed o n ly w here "o ther w aters" are similarly situated un der Optio n 2 (the shaded areas). Otherw ise, state

bo un daries are displayed.

So urce: U .S. En viro n men tal Pro tectio n Ag en cy, “Level III Eco reg io n s o f the Co n tin en tal U n ited States,” map scale 1:7,500,000 (Co rvallis, OR: U .S. EPA – Natio n al Health

an d En viro n men tal Effects Research Labo rato ry, 2013), available at http://w w w.epa.g o v/w ed/pag es/eco reg io n s/level_ iii_ iv.htm.

Map A: Level III Eco reg io n s fo r Co n sideratio n U n der "Other Waters" in Sectio n III.H o f 

Defin itio n o f "Waters o f the U n ited States" U n der the Clean Water Act
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** CONCURRING OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00004

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .A . and A.A.I. From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00255 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Concurring Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Karen An gelini, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2015 I am in full agreement with the majority opinion, but write separately to emphasize what the Supreme Court has long recognized as not only the statutory right to counsel in parental termination proceedings, but effective counsel. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 107.013 (West 2014);
In re M.S. , 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003). In every case, the trial court, after appointing counsel, is best

- position ed to recognize when counsel’s obligations as an officer of the court fall short for failing to appear at scheduled hearings. The court is also best situated to question whether counsel’s failure to appear on behalf of a parent whose rights are sought to be terminated risks depriving the parent of a fair trial.
B ecause the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent the interests of a parent in a termination case, and that parent has a right to effective assistance of competent counsel, a trial court is cautioned against proceeding to enter rulings where appointed counsel wholly fails toConcurring Opinion 04

- 15

- 00004

- CV

- 2

- appear on behalf of their client, without regard to a showing of prejudice. See In re J.M.O. , 459 S.W.3d at 90, 9 3

- 94 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2014, no pet.)

. It is difficult to imagine that any court can regard the performance of an attorney, one appointed by the court itself to serve in our civil parental

- rights termination proceedings, and who then fails to appear at a scheduled hearing , each significant, as within the range of reasonable professional assistance. “Both the parent and the child have a substantial interest in the accuracy and justice of a decision.” In re M.S. , 115 S.W.3d at 547. The interests involved in parental

- rights termination cases, including those held by the State, the parent and the child, are fundamental. When the court appoints counsel to protect those interests, yet fails to demand at a minimum counsel’s appearance in court before conductin g a proceeding that will permanently and irrevocably affect the rights of a parent and child, it ostensibly contributes to the “risk of erroneous deprivation” that is “unacceptable.” Id . at 549. To expect less than what is required at a minimum by our ru les of professional conduct, notwithstanding the service entrusted by the court upon appointed counsel, is for the court to suffer a tolerance for less than competent and diligent representation and a risk of rendering a presumptively unreliable result.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 14555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03933]



[[Page 14555]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12343]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Art and War in the 
Renaissance: The Battle of Pavia Tapestries'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Art and War in the Renaissance: 
The Battle of Pavia Tapestries'' at the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, 
Texas; the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, de Young Museum, San 
Francisco, California; The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, in Houston, 
Texas; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9aabcbaadb0b6b7ebedece099aaadb8adbcf7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45362026312c2a2b7771707c0536312431206b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-03933 Filed 2-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1  S QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For quarterly period ended June 30, 2008  £ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  Commission file number: 000-30245  IDI Global, Inc. (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)  Nevada87-0617040(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)  3520 North University Ave, Suite 300, Provo, Utah84604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)  Issuers telephone number, including area code: (801) 224-4444  Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  S No £  Indicate by check made whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the exchange Act) Yes £ No S  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):  Large accelerated filer £  Accelerated filer £ Non-accelerated filer £  Smaller reporting company S  As of August 14, 2008, IDI Global, Inc., had 19,160,174 shares of common stock outstanding.  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes  £  No   S       Explanatory Note:  Pursuant to comment letters received by the Registrant from the Securities and Exchange Commission dated July 31, and October 20, 2008, the Registrant is filing this amendment to Form 10-Q. We have updated paragraph four of our certification required by the Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). Paragraphs 4 and 4(b) have been updated in this filing (Exhibit 31).    SIGNATURES  In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.   IDI GLOBAL, INC.    Date: December 11, 2008  By: /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith President, Chief Executive Officer, (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer)  2
Filed 4/28/16 In re Aguilar CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re JAVIER AGUILAR

 on Habeas Corpus.

 G053435

 (Super. Ct. No. 11HF0530)

 O P I N I O N

Original proceedings; petition for a writ of habeas corpus to file a timely 

notice of appeal. Petition granted.

Helen S. Izra for Petitioner.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, and Julie L. Garland, Assistant 

Attorney General for Respondent.

* * *
2

THE COURT:*

Petitioner, Javier Aguilar, seeks relief from the failure to file a timely notice 

of appeal from his criminal conviction. We agree Aguilar is entitled to relief and the 

petition is granted.

Following a jury trial, Javier Aguilar was convicted of a number of criminal 

offenses and sentenced to 45 years to life. In his declaration, trial counsel states that after 

the sentencing hearing, Aguilar advised him that he wanted to appeal his conviction. 

According to trial counsel, he advised Aguilar that he would file a notice of appeal on his 

behalf, but due to an error, the notice of appeal was inadvertently filed two days late. 

(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).) When Aguilar attempted to file his notice of appeal, 

the superior court stamped his notice of appeal “‘Received 08/27/15, but not filed,’” and 

transmitted a letter to counsel explaining the last day to file a timely notice of appeal was 

August 25, 2015.

The Attorney General does not oppose granting the petition without the 

issuance of an order to show cause. (People v. Romero (1994) 8 Cal.4th 728.)

The principle of constructive filing of the notice of appeal is applied in 

situations where trial counsel advises a criminal defendant that he will file a notice of 

appeal on his client’s behalf, and then fails to do so in accordance with the law. (In re 

Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 87-88.) Because trial counsel has a duty to file a proper 

notice of appeal on his client’s behalf, (Pen. Code § 1240.1, subd. (b)) Aguilar’s 

reasonable reliance on counsel’s promise to file a timely notice of appeal entitles him to 

the relief requested.

The petition is granted. The Clerk of the Superior Court is directed to file 

the notice of appeal that was received but not filed on August 27, 2015. Further 

proceedings, including preparation of the record on appeal, are to be conducted according 

 

* Before O’Leary, P. J., Rylaarsdam, J., and Aronson, J.
3

to the applicable rules of court. In the interest of justice, the opinion in this matter is 

deemed final as to this court forthwith.