alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1775 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

fraudulent representations about having received military 

decorations or medals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 1775 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stolen Valor Act of 

3 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT 

5 OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘wears,’’; and 

9 (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: 

10 ‘‘(b) FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RE11 CEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Who12 ever, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tan13 gible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipi14 ent of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) 

15 or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more 

16 than one year, or both.’’. 

17 (b) ADDITION OF CERTAIN OTHER MEDALS.—Sec18 tion 704(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘If a decoration’’ and inserting 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a decoration’’; 

22 (2) by inserting ‘‘a combat badge,’’ after ‘‘1129 

23 of title 10,’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(2) COMBAT BADGE DEFINED.—In this sub26 section, the term ‘combat badge’ means a Combat 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

HR 1775 RDS 

1 Infantryman’s Badge, Combat Action Badge, Com2 bat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Com3 bat Action Medal.’’. 

4 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 704 of title 

5 18, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections 

6 (c)(1) and (d) by striking ‘‘or (b)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
National Archives and Records Administratllm

Office of the Federal Register

July 22, 2010

FAA

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 915 J, Regulations Division

Washington, DC 20591

ATrN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The material listed in the attachment is approved for incorporation by reference in 14 eFR Part 39.

This approval is co.ntingent upon the final rule contaLuing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. Toe approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is eJlective on the effective date of your

final rule. If you wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office oftbe Federal Register; and

3. ~tify me in writing of the change.

Federal Register Attorney: HSV

Attachment

u.s. mail address: 8601 Adelphi ~oad,CoUegp Park, MD 20740--6001

Office l(,JcaUon: 800 N9rlh Capitol Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4244

Federal Register web sites: http://www.archives.gov/federal-registerl/lldhttp:! j www_gp0<lccess.govjnma
Incorporation by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2009-JOJ5; Directorareldentijier 2009-CE-039-AD; Amendment 39~J6376; AD 20JO-15-1O

Piper Aircraft. Inc,

Piper Aircraft. Inc.

Mandatory Service

Bulletin No, 1197A

Mandatory Service

Bulletin No. 11978

09/01/2009

05/03/2010

Docket No. FAA-20JO-0/7 3; Directorate identifier 2009-NM-076-AD; Amendment 39-/6374; AD 201 O-J5-08

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Alert Service Bulletin Revision 5

737-57A1218

CIlapter 20-42-09, Revision 25

"Electrodeposited

Nickel Plating," Boeing

(737) Slandard

Overhaul Practices

Manual

02109/2009

07/0112009

Docket No. FAA-10JD-Ol2',. Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD; Amendment 39-J 63 70: AD 1010-15-04

Eurocopter Emergency Alert

Service Bulletin No.

05AOO3

Revision 2 0210312009

Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 62- Revision 1

007

0711012009

Docket No. FAA-20/0-0729; Directorate Identifier 201O-CE-032~AD; Amendment 39-/6373; AD 201O-J 5-07

Zaklad Szybowcowy "Jez6w" Henryk Mynarski

Priflted 711//2010

Mandatory Bulletin 80-

78-10-10

06/07/2010

Page I of I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UNITED FOODS INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                       285
<INVENTORY>                                     37,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,437
<PP&E>                                         126,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,258
<BONDS>                                         46,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,810
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,884
<SALES>                                        195,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,087
<CGS>                                          158,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    754
<INCOME-TAX>                                       294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### Joe SHIPMAN, Appellant, v. E. D. MILLER et al., Appellees.

No. 6514.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

Sept. 19, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1955.

*727Storey, Storey & Donaghey, Vernon, for appellant.

Sam B. Spence and James D. Rexford, Wichita Falls, for appellees.

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

Plaintiffs, E. D. Miller and J. D. Banks, doing business under the trade name of Miller & Banks, brought this action originally to recover judgment in the sum of $10,700.54 against the defendants, W. P. Durbin and Joe Shipman. Plaintiffs were drilling contractors and entered into a written agreement with defendants, W. P. Durbin and Joe Shipman, to drill an oil well upon what was designated as the Eg-gleston lease, Wilbarger County, Texas, located approximately one mile southwest of Vernon, Texas. During the trial of the case, after all parties had closed, the trial judge withdrew the case from the jury and granted judgment for the plaintiffs as against W. P. Durbin and Joe Shipman for the sum of $10,700.54.

There is no question raised in this case about the plaintiffs not completing the well as agreed and neither is there any question raised as to the correctness of the amount still unpaid as specified in the agreement.. W. P. Durbin did not appeal from the judgment. Joe Shipman alone ■ appealed from the judgment of the trial court. Neither does Joe Shipman deny signing the instrument sued upon but merely contends that he was not to be held liable as set out in the written agreement and that such purported written contract was not sufficient to show any liability on the part of appellant and that he would not have signed the same if he were to be liable upon such agreement.

The written agreement stated the contractor (Miller & Banks were contractors) agreed to drill said well, etc., and operator agreed to pay for said drilling at a specified rate and the agreement was signed by both W. P. Durbin and Joe Shipman where they stated they approved the agreement.

No other reasonable conclusion could be reached under the record in this cause than that appellant, Joe Shipman, agreed to pay as pleaded by appellees because there is no question but what he signed the agreement and in the absence of pleading of fraud, accident or mistake in the preparation or in the execution of the written instrument, there can be no extrinsic evidence to defeat the instrument. We believe that this rule has been so well established in this state that there can be no other reasonable conclusion reached. Davis v. Davis, 141 Tex. 613, 175 S.W.2d 226. Appellant’s assignment of error is overruled. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Aging Trends and Caregiving.                    

*Date:*                         March 12, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2W200, (301) 827-3101,                         *dario.dieguez@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 15, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-03551 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### John H. JOHNSON et al., Appellants, v. E. M. McCOY’S ADMINISTRATOR (C. Homer Neikirk), Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 2, 1955.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellants.

C. Homer Neikirk, Somerset, for appel-lee. 1

SIMS, Judge.

Appellants, John H. Johnson and wife, Josephine, filed suit against E. M. McCoy’s administrator to recover $2,345 for care and support they rendered decedent from December 1, 1949, to March 15, Í951. At the conclusion of all the evidence the court directed a verdict for appellee.

Notice of appeal was filed by appellants in the circuit court and they filed the record in the office of the clerk of this court, but filed no motion for appeal. Their statement of appeal found in the record contains this: "This appeal is not prosecuted under § 21.080 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, and does not involve the custody of a child.” We feel constrained to regard the first “not” in the sentence just quoted as being an error, as the only procedure in our statutes for prosecuting an appeal when the amount in controversy is less than $2,500 is under § 21.080.

It is provided in KRS 21.080, “When the amount in controversy is as much as two hundred dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and less than twenty-five hundred dollars, an appeal may be prosecuted upon paying the tax and filing the record in the office of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals in the time and manner provided by law, and entering a motion that the appeal be granted.” In Davis v. Underwood, Ky., 283 S.W.2d 851, we held the provisions of this statute to be mandatory, and that where appellant failed to file motion for an appeal this court does not obtain jurisdiction of the subject matter. It was pointed out in that opinion both RCA 1.180 and CR 73.02(3) provide for a motion for appeal to be filed at the time the record on appeal is docketed in this court.

Since appellant failed to file a motion in this court for appeal, we have no jurisdiction to hear the case and it must be dismissed. It may be of comfort to counsel for appellants to know we have examined the record and find no merit in their attempted appeal. Had it not been dismissed for failure to file motion for appeal, nevertheless, the judgment would have been affirmed on its merits.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                           OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Pure
Country

Date: October 22, 2002        By: /s/ Lewis Eslick
                              Name: Lewis Eslick
                              Title: President, Chief
                              Executive Officer and Chief
                              Financial Officer
#### W. E. DUVALL, Appellant, v. Bussell COLE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 23, 1956.

Hatcher & Lewis, Elizabethtown, for appellant.

Faurest & Montgomery, Elizabethtown, for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.

The appellant, W. E. Duvall, contends he is entitled to a directed verdict against the appellee, Russell Cole, for damages received in an automobile intersection collision in Hardin County on July 16, 1953. No complaint is made of the instructions or of any errors at the trial other than the refusal of the trial court to give a peremptory instruction in appellant’s favor. The jury found both parties negligent.

The testimony of the litigants conflicted, each claiming a truck which was being unloaded in front of a store located in a corner o'f, the intersection obstructed vision of the other’s car. Cole was traveling on an inferior highway (Ky. 84), but he stopped at the intersection before turning left or eastward onto U. S. 62. However, he edged his car slightly onto U. S. 62 in order to see around the parked truck, misjudged the speed of D'uvall’s car approaching from the east, and the collision occurred after most of Cole’s car had crossed' the westbound lane of U. S. 62. On the other hand, Duvall testified that he was not proceeding more than forty miles an hour, but that he skidded on the wet road when he applied his brakes. The testimony of the driver of the parked truck and the owner of the store concerned mostly the moderate speed of the Duvall car, whether it skidded and *664how far, and estimates of distance. A state policeman testified that Cole had stated his engine choked on him as he proceeded across the' intersection. The intersection was wide, the jury saw it, and may well have concluded that Duvall could. have avoided the collision had he had his car under control and kept a proper lookout ahead.

While KRS 189.330(4) does provide that a vehicle shall not be driven onto a through highway (U. S. 62) from an inferior highway (Ky. 84) when another car is approaching so closely on the through highway as to constitute an immediate hazard, the application of the statute depends on the facts of the case. Here, we do not find the evidence so clear-cut that a directed verdict would have been justified.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
            UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of E-Z-
EM, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
            ended June 1, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date  August 29, 2002                      /s/ Anthony A. Lombardo
    -------------------                   ------------------------------------
                                           Anthony A. Lombardo, President,
                                           Chief Executive Officer, Director


                                      -87-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        3256
<SECURITIES>                                  2959
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5287
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1942
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             14691
<PP&E>                                        9888
<DEPRECIATION>                                3783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               77956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        25379
<BONDS>                                      32500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     21509
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1743)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 77956
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             97449
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                66020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             34903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              3753
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (10914)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (3406)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7508)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (2430)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (9938)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.09)

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CH Lighting International Corporation
(the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      May 14, 2010
            By:
            /s/Huang Hsiao-IName:
            Huang
      Hsiao-ITitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary,
              Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CH Lighting International Corporation will
be retained by CH Lighting International Corporation and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
MANAGING FLOWBACK AND PRODUCED WATER 

Robert Waits 

212 Resources 

380 E. Main Street, Bldg. B, Suite 204 

Midway, UT 84049 

Voice: 435-654-9191 

Fax: 435-654-9192 

rwaits@212resources.com

DeWitt Dees* 

212 Resources 

Houston, TX 

Rigorous discharge standards, aquifer protection demands and the high cost and impact of transportation 

are transforming the way the natural gas industry and regulatory agencies consider drilling programs and 

water management. 

212 Resources owns and operates two water recovery "PODs" in the Anticline Wyoming area and will 

expand its water treatment services with two more units headed to the Vega Field in Colorado and a fifth 

unit to the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania. The 212 Resources process package includes a patented 

Hybrid-MVR, Turbulent-Flow Regime, Flash-Evaporation / Distillation system. The service competes 

favorably in the marketplace. Recovery of NG condensate, methanol, creation of fresh, distilled water, 

improved gel mix, reduction in trucking, and many other factors yields a competitive net cost and reduces 

the environmental impact of drilling and water use.

For over twelve years 212 Resources' proven core technology, the Vacom system, has enabled users, 

which include Toyota, YKK, AisenWarner, Caterpillar and others, to create zero-discharge water 

management in their plants. Our three-year old Texas facility, which handles crude oil tank bottoms, 

enables over 300 oil and gas companies to maximize resource recovery to meet the highest of 

environmental standards. Along with our technology, we have developed an industry acclaimed net 

costing model which will clearly define the real costs of water and the benefits of recovery and beneficial 

reuse. 

###