alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MSDS: Yes L abel: No

Gen Eqpt: Skin: Wear appropriate chemical resistant protective clothing and chemical resistant gloves to prevent skin contact. Use nitrile- t ype glove material. Rinse immediately if skin is contaminated. Wash contaminated clothing and clean protective equipment before reuse. Wash thoroughly after handling. // Eye prote c tion: Where eye contact may be likely, wear chemical goggles and have eye flushing equipment available. // Investigate engineering techniques to reduce exposures. Provide ventilation if necessary to minimize exposures.If practical, use local

mechanical exhaust ventilation at sources of air contamination such as open process equipment.

Respirator: Avoid breathing vapor or mist. Where airborne exposure is likely or airborne exposure limits are exceeded (if applicable, see above), use NIOSH approved respira t ory protection equipment appropriate to the material and/or its components (full facepiece recommended). Consult respirator manufacturer to determine appropriate type equipment for a given application. Observe respirator use limitations specified by NIOSH or the manufacturer. For emergency and other conditions where there may be a potential for significant exposure or where exposure limit may be significantly exceeded, use an approved full face positive-pressure, self-contained breathing apparatus or positive-pressure airline with auxiliary self- c ontained air supply. Respiratory protection programs must comply with 29 CFR § 1910.134.

Health Effects: Signs and symptoms of acute exposure: May cause eye irritation. May cause skin irritation. Skin: Moderately irritating. (data for similar material). Eyes: Moderately irritating. (data for similar material).INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0216 0217, 0218

X

T

T

X
QAG 

Ambient 

Ambient/ 

Gas Valve 

H E 

A 

T 

E 

R 

Sample 

Shut-off 

Valve 

HEATER 

FIGURE 4. MULTI-METALS CEMS (XACT) 

H 

E 

A 

T 

E 

R 

XACT 

SAMPLE BUILDING 

STILLING 

CHAMBER 

I o9/23/05 1 LILFIG4 I o2o305
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 
  






 
 NUMBER NB INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SAHRES CUSIP 62921N 10 5 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS AND LEGENDS This ertifies hat is the record holder of FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.Dated: CHIEF TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SECRETARY COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (BROOKLYN, NY) 












 



 
 The Corporation shall furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the powers, designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the
Corporation’s Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN,OR DESTROYED THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT
CERTIFICATE. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be constued as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN
ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common COM PROP – as community property UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
(State) UNIF TRF MIN ACT – Custodian (until age ) (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s)
unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) shares of the capital stock represented by within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of the substitution in the premises. Dated Signature(s) Guaranteed: NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST
CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE
DATED.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer), President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ David A. Gestetner    President, Chief Executive           June 22, 2006
--------------------------    Officer and Chief Financial
        David A. Gestetner    Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer and
                              Principal Financial and
                              Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                |   |   | /s/ Kevin Rakin         |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  | August 9, 2005 |   |   | Kevin Rakin             |
|   |                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Roschell STEPHENS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28997.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Henry Wade, Criminal District Atty., Thomas B. Thorpe, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary of a private residence in nighttime, with prior convictions for offenses of like character alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte Charlie DENSON.

No. 29315.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 13, 1957.

*953John T. Buckley, Cleveland, Clarence D. Cain, Liberty, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from art order of the County Court of Liberty County remanding relator to custody after a hearing in a habeas corpus proceeding.

Notice of appeal was given on May 2, 1957. Appellant was allowed 90 days after the date of giving notice of appeal within which to prepare and file a statement of facts. Art. 759a, Sec. 4, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

The statement of facts appearing in the record was filed in the trial court on August 5, 1957, which was not within the required time.

The affidavit of one of appellant’s attorneys shows that the statement of facts was completed and approved by him on July 24, 1957; and that on that date he, by letter, informed the county attorney of his approval of the statement of facts, which he also forwarded by mail on that date, and requested that he file the same immediately with the clerk of the trial court.

According to the above affidavit the statement of facts had not been approved by the county attorney or the trial judge when it was forwarded to the county attorney on July 24.

There is no showing that the appellant or either of his attorneys gave the matter of the approval of the statement of facts by the county attorney or the trial judge or its filing with the clerk of the trial court any attention after July 24.

It is incumbent upon the appellant to obtain the statement of facts, to have the same properly approved, and to follow it up to see that it is filed as required by law. Fleming v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 519, 279 S.W.2d 340. Counsel may not excuse the late filing of the statement of facts by showing that he forwarded the same to the county attorney with the request that he file the same immediately with the clerk *954of the trial court. 4 Tex.Juris., Sec. 306, p. 440; Bailey v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 429, 195 S.W.2d 361.

The record in the instant case shows a lack of diligence on the part of the appellant to file the statement of facts within the time allowed by law!

In the absence of a statement of facts which may be considered nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3184

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Martin Lima-Pacheco, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 24, 2007 Filed: May 29, 2007

___________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Martin Lima-Pacheco pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravat ed felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Having calcula ted a Guidelines imprisonment range of 70-87 months, the district court 1 sentenced him to 75 months. Lima-Pacheco appeals, arguing that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court did not consider relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors that should have received significant weight. We disagree.-2- See United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 261-62 (2005) (appellate review for unreasonableness). The record shows that the district court properly considered the undisputed advisory Guidelines range, the nature of the offense, the defendant’s circumstances and history (including repeated unlawful entries, deportations, and imprisonment), sentencing objectives (especially deterren ce), and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities. We hold that the sent ence the district court then imposed is not unreasonable. See United States v. Davidson , 437 F.3d 737, 741 (8th Cir. 2006) (addressing consideration of § 3553(a) f actors); United States v. Sebastian , 436 F.3d 913, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2006) (with regard to determination “that certain disparities are warranted,” recognizing both Congress’s policymaking power and Attorney General’s prosecutorial discretion). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
April 11, 2011 

The following attachments were made available for viewing (as posters or as an oral 

presentation) and as handouts (information sheets) at the open house and public hearing events in 

Shiprock, Fruitland, Farmington, and Durango during the week of March 28, 2011.
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David S. Harkness, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ David S. Harkness |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | August 19, 2003
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|David S. Harkness     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer )       |  |
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**














We hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-1 (No. 333-121563) of Communication Intelligence Corporation and its
      Subsidiaries of our report dated February 17, 2006, (which report expresses
      an
      unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
      entity’s ability to continue as a going concern described in note 1 to the
      consolidated financial statements), relating to the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule which appears in this form 10-K.








/s/
      STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.





San
      Francisco, California


March
      30,
      2006
Exhibit 32.1   Wings & Things, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wings & Things, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wings & Things, Inc. Date: May 13, 2008/s/ Greg Popp
Greg Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of Capital Gold Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Christopher Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
              Christopher
              ChipmanChristopher
                Chipman
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              March
                16, 2007
**Exhibit
        23**
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**
 **PUBLIC
        ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 We
        have
        issued our report dated June 20, 2005, accompanying the financial statements
        included in the Annual Report of SpectraScience, Inc. on Form 10-KSB, for
        the
        year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
        reference of said report in the Registration Statement of SpectraScience,
        Inc.
        on Form S-8 (File No. 333-57038).
 
 
 /s/
        J.H.
        Cohn LLP
 
 San
        Diego, California
 July
        6,
        2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,129
<INVENTORY>                                     67,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,102
<PP&E>                                         634,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,272
<BONDS>                                        354,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,825
<SALES>                                        826,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               826,359
<CGS>                                          702,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  784,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (20,173)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.09)
        

</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2014 - 0288 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 01 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 1 20L/2227/13 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f yes, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by iss ue**  (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
#### Mrs. Henry WYNNE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27751.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $750.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 31, 2003                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer

March 31, 2003                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Principal Accounting Officer