alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Water And Wastewater Rates (Details) (USD $)In Thousands, unless otherwise specified** | 3 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Water And Wastewater Rates [Line Items]**                                              |           |           |   |
| Base rate increase designed to increase total operating revenues on an annual basis      | $ 2,715        |           | $ 2,471 |
| Infrastructure rehabilitation surcharges                                                 |           | $ 1,429        |   |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Base rate increase designed to increase total operating revenues on an annual basis
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtr_BaseRateIncreaseDesignedToIncreaseTotalOperatingRevenuesOnAnnualBasis**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Infrastructure Rehabilitation Surcharges
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**wtr_InfrastructureRehabilitationSurcharges**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**wtr_WaterAndWastewaterRatesLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**wtr_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, Income Statement and Exhibit 11 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,468
<INVENTORY>                                     62,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,497
<PP&E>                                         134,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           230
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,931
<SALES>                                        309,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,339
<CGS>                                          147,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
        


</TABLE>
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Isiah James, Jr., Petitioner,

v.

South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000028 Lower Court Case No. 2005-CP-40-02795

Appeal From Richland County The Honorable DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-012 Submitted May 6, 2014 – Filed May 14, 2014

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Isiah James, Jr., pro se petitioner, of Ridgeland.

Tommy Evans, Jr., of Sout h Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certio rari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in James v. S.C. Dep' t of Probation, Parole and Pardon Servs.

,Op. No. 2012-UP-503 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Se pt. 5, 2012). We grant the petition, dispense with further briefing, reverse the Court of Appeals' opinion, and remand the case to the circuit court fo r a decision on petitioner's appeal.

In 2003, the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services (SCDPPPS) denied petitioner's request for pa role. The Admini strative Law Court affirmed the denial. On June 13, 2005, pe titioner appealed the denial to the circuit court and simultaneously sought to have his appeal transferred to the Court of Appeals. The SCDPPPS oppos ed the transfer, and the transfer was denied.

In 2011, SCDPPPS moved to dismiss petiti oner's appeal pending in the circuit court, arguing the Court of Appeals, rath er than the circuit court, had subject matter jurisdiction over petitio ner's appeal. The circuit court dismissed the appeal, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Because petitioner filed the appeal in the circuit court on June 13, 2005, prior to the effective date of 2006 Act No. 387 1 the circuit court had jurisdiction to hear petitioner's appeal. Accordingly, we re verse the Court of Appeals' opinion and remand the case to the circuit court for a decision on petitioner's appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, KITTREDG E and HEARN, JJ., concur. BEATTY, J., not participating.

1 Act 387, which was signed into law on June 9, 2006, and became effective on June 1, 2006, provided a uniform procedure for contested cases a nd appeals from administrative agencies. The Act amended § 1-23-610, but indicated that petitions for judicial review that were pending before the circuit court at that time would be h eard in accordance with the former law.
**Exhibit23.1**

** **

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

** **

We consent to the incorporationby reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Parkway Properties, Inc. (theCompany) of our report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, included in the 2007 Annual Report toShareholders of the Company.  

Our audits also included thefinancial statement schedules of Parkway Properties, Inc. listed in Item 15(a).These schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, asto which the date is February 27, 2008, the financial statement schedulesreferred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financialstatements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects theinformation set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

(1) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-92957) of Parkway Properties, Inc.,

(2) RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-108786) of Parkway Properties, Inc.,

(3) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 on Form S-3, No. 333-88861) and related prospectuses pertainingto the Parkway Properties, Inc.        Employee Excellence Recognition Plan, 1997 Non‐EmployeeDirectors' Stock Ownership Plan, 1994 Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Planand 1991 Directors Stock Option Plan,

(4) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 on Form S-3, No. 333-00311) and related prospectuspertaining to the Parkway Properties, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, 1991Incentive Plan and 1991 Directors Stock Option Plan,

(5) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 333-100565) pertaining to the Parkway Properties, Inc.2001 Directors Stock Option Plan, 

(6) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 333-115286), and  pertaining to the ParkwayProperties, Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the Employee ExcellenceRecognition Plan, and

(7) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-134069) pertaining to the ParkwayProperties, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,

 

of our report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Companyincorporated herein by reference, our report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofthe Company, included herein, and our report included in the precedingparagraph with respect to the financial statement schedules of the Companyincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Parkway Properties, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

                        /s/ Ernst&Young LLP  

Houston, Texas  

February 27, 2008
Exhibit 32.1(1)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Subrah S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/  SUBRAH S. IYAR
------------------------
Subrah S. Iyar
Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 was provided to WebEx Communications, Inc. and will be
retained by WebEx Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


-------------------------------
(1)  This statement is submitted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of that section.
#### Sammie Lee DEDRICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28162.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquors in a dry area and punishment assessed at a fine of $150.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008. The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 31, 2009                     /s/ Raul S. McQuivey
                                          --------------------------
                                          Raul S. McQuivey
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)




Dated: March 31, 2009                     /s/ Sidney C. Hooper
                                          --------------------------
                                          Sidney C. Hooper
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                          (Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT (12) - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                               <C>
Average Equity to Average Assets = Average Equity Divided by Average Assets

Return on Average Assets = Net Income Divided by Average Assets

Return on Average Equity = Net Income Divided by Average Equity

Efficiency Ratio = Total Other Expenses Divided by Net Interest Income Plus Total Other Income

Dividends Declared as a Percent of Net Income = Cash Dividends Divided by Net Income

Average Total Loans to Average Deposits = Average Total Loans Divided by Average Deposits

Nonperforming  Loans to Total  Loans = Nonaccruing Loans Plus Loans Ninety Days Past Due and Accruing
                                         Interest plus Restructured Loans Divided by Total Loans

Nonperforming Assets to Total Assets = Nonaccruing Loans plus Loans Ninety Days
                                         Past Due and Accruing Interest plus  Restructured Loans plus
                                         Other Real Estate Owned plus In-substance Foreclosures Divided
                                         by Total Assets

Allowance for Loan Losses to Nonperforming Loans = Allowance for Loan Losses Divided by Nonaccruing Loans plus
                                                     Loans Ninety Days Past Due and Accruing Interest Plus Restructured Loans

Allowance for Loan Losses as a Percent of Total Loans = Allowance for Loan Losses Divided by Total Loans
</TABLE>




                                       11
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LAWRENCE PETROSKY

(14521)

Spear, Hennessy and Cretella, Js.

Argued March 19

decision released April 2, 1996

*950
      *Milo J. Altschuler,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Robert J. Scheinblum,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *John A. Connelly,*state’s attorney, and *John J. Davenport,*for the appel-lee (state).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
ogen-ex41_719.htm



Exhibit 4.1



SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN Definiens CUSIP 684023 30 2 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK WITH A PAR VALUE OF U.S. $0.001 PER SHARE IN THE CAPITAL STOCK OF 0RAGENICS, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the registered holder hereof in person or by Attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Florida, and to the Articles of incorporation. on and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar of the Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed on its behalf the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with its corporate seal. COUNTERSIGNED: BY: CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY NEW YORK. NY TRANSFER AGENT Number shares ORAGENICS 2 incorporated under the laws of this state of Florida common stock the certifies that: proof is the owner of dated: ORAGENICS, INC. corporate seal 2002 president authorizes officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: March 25, 2005


/s/ Michael L. DeMarco
----------------------------------------
Michael L. DeMarco,
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


First Amendment to
Permanent Employment Contract


BETWEEN:
	
		
	 

	 
	 

	EMPLOYER
	ACCENTURE SAS, a simplified joint stock company (Société par Actions Simplifiée), hereinafter referred to as the “Company” as the first party,

	 
	AND:

	EMPLOYEE
	Pierre Nanterme, residing in Paris, France as the second party,




ACCENTURE SAS and Pierre Nanterme shall be individually referred to hereinafter as the “Party” and jointly as the “Parties.”   
This First Amendment amends that certain Permanent Employment Contract entered into between the Parties on June 26, 2013, and with effect from July 1, 2013 (the “Employment Contract”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Contract. 
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN AGREED:
		
	1.
	This amendment to the Employment Contract is entered into for an indefinite period with effect from January 10, 2019 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). 




		
	2.
	The first paragraph of Section 2.1 of the Employment Contract is amended to read as follows:




“Pierre Nanterme shall serve as Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Accenture plc, Management status. His responsibilities include, among other things, advising the individual acting as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.”


		
	3.
	Effective as of and after the Amendment Effective Date, all references in the Employment Contract to Mr. Nanterme’s service as “Chief Executive Officer” or to his role or status as such shall be deemed to refer to his role as “Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer”.




		
	4.
	Section 7.1 of the Employment Contract is amended to read as follows:











“As a result of his duties, Pierre Nanterme may regularly travel to the offices of any of the companies in the Group.”
		
	5.
	Except as otherwise amended hereby, the Employment Contract is hereby ratified and confirmed.




		
	6.
	This First Amendment to the Employment Contract is subject to French law, with regard to its execution and its termination, and any dispute relating thereto shall fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the French courts.




Paris, France, dated January 9, 2019
In duplicate


	
				
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Read and Approved:
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Pierre Nanterme       
	 
	/s/ Olivier Girard
	 

	Pierre Nanterme       
	 
	ACCENTURE SAS      
	 

	 
	 
	By:
Name: Olivier Girard
Title:   President
Exhibit 31.1  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Kevin R. Griffith, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IDI Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 21, 2006 /s/ Kevin R. Griffith Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)