### 39597 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

U.S. Standards for grades of canned Effective date Change level of quality designation to single term Other revisions proposed

Chili Sauce .................................................................. 10/20/53 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Corn, Cream Style ....................................................... 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for stand ards. Add Standard of Identity citation. Add Latin name. Hominy ........................................................................ 03/10/58 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Leafy Greens ............................................................... 09/01/73 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Add titles to Tables IV and V. Correct Standard of Identity citation. Okra ............................................................................. 07/08/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Okra and Tomatoes or Tomatoes and Okra ............... 12/24/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Onions ......................................................................... 11/02/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Add titles for Tables II and III. Add Standard of Identity citation. Peas and Carrots ........................................................ 07/20/70 Yes ................... Update address for stand ards. Peas, Field and Black-eye Peas ................................. 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’ Pimientos ..................................................................... 10/23/67 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Pumpkin (Squash) ....................................................... 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for standa rds. Sauerkraut ................................................................... 05/13/63 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Spinach ........................................................................ 05/08/71 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Correct Standard of Identity citation. Squash (Summer Type) .............................................. 05/25/59 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Succotash .................................................................... 05/24/67 Yes ................... Update address for standards. Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’ Put ‘‘proportion of ingredients’’ in outline form.

The proposed revisions to these grade standards would provide a common language for trade and better reflect the current marketing of fruits and vegetables.

A 60-day period is provided for interested persons to submit comments on the proposed grade standards. Copies of the proposed revised standards are available on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627. Dated: June 13, 2016. Dana Coale, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14332 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–3629; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–011–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of comment period. **SUMMARY :**  We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Dassault Aviation ModelMYSTERE-FALCON 50, MYSTEREFALCON 900, FALCON 900EX, FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX airplanes. The NPRM proposed torequire modification of the anticollision light bonding. The NPRM was prompted by a report of an in-flightlightning strike to the WHELEN anticollision light located on the top of the vertical fin tip that caused severe damage and resulted in the loss of some airplane functions. This action revises the NPRM by clarifying the applicability. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) to prevent loss of electrical power and essential airplane functions, and possible reduced control of the airplane. Since these actions impose an additional burden over those proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these proposed changes.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this SNPRM by August 1, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 3629; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone: 800–647–5527) is in the

**ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.


### 39598 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227– 1137; fax 425–227–1139.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the

**ADDRESSES** section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2015–3629; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–011–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50, MYSTERE-FALCON 900, FALCON 900EX, FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2015 (80 FR 57545) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM was prompted by a report of an in-flight lightning strike to the WHELEN anti-collision light located on the top of the vertical fin tip that caused severe damage and induced the loss of some airplane functions. The NPRM proposed to require modification of the anti-collision light bonding.

Actions Since Previous NPRM Was Issued

Since we issued the NPRM, we have determined that we inadvertently referred to specific service information to identify affected airplanes in figure 1 to paragraph (c) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM). In order to clarify the applicability and identify the affected airplanes as specified in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, dated January 15, 2015, we have removed references to specific service information from the applicability of this proposed AD.

The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, dated January 15, 2015 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Dassault Aviation ModelMYSTERE-FALCON 50, MYSTEREFALCON 900, FALCON 900EX, FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX airplanes. The MCAI states:

An occurrence was reported where aFalcon 2000 aeroplane experienced an inflight lightning strike, which caused severe damage and induced the loss of some aeroplane functions. The investigation results revealed that the entering point of the lightning was at the WHELEN anti-collision light located on the top of the vertical fin tip.

When the lightning strike hit the anticollision light, an electric arc occurredbetween the aeroplane structure and the anticollision light and created a conductive path by which the lightning current entered inside the aeroplane. Further analysis has determined that the electrical bonding between the WHELEN anti-collision light, Part Number (P/N) 01–0790044–09, and the fin tip fairing or the No. 2 engine air intake cover is insufficient to withstand a lightning strike.

In case of severe lightning, this condition, if not corrected, could lead to an unsafe condition (loss of electrical power and/or of essential functions) possibly resulting in reduced control of the aeroplane.

To address this potential unsafe condition, Dassault Aviation developed a modification (mod) to improve the WHELEN anti-collision light bonding when the anti-collision light is located on top of the vertical fin tip or on No. 2 engine air intake cover, and issued several Service Bulletins (SB) to modify all affected aeroplanes in service.

For the reasons described above, this[EASA] AD requires modification of the anticollision light bonding.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3629.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

Dassault Aviation has issued the following service information.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, Revision 1 (also referred to as 481–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900–372, Revision 1 (also referred to as 372–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900–378, Revision 1 (also referred to as 378–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX– 285, Revision 1 (also referred to as 285– R1), dated January 26, 2015.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX– 305, Revision 1 (also referred to as 305– R1), dated January 26, 2015. • Dassault Service Bulletin F2000– 337, Revision 1 (also referred to as 337– R1), dated January 26, 2015.

• Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX– 108, Revision 1 (also referred to as 108– R1), dated January 26, 2015.

The service information describesprocedures for modifying the anticollision light bonding. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the **ADDRESSES** section.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this proposed AD. We considered the comments received. Request To Address the Original Grimes Anti-Collision Light Installation

An anonymous commenter stated that the NPRM should address the original Grimes anti-collision light installation. This commenter asserted that anyaircraft with the original Grimes anticollision light installation would still be vulnerable to inadequate bonding.

We acknowledge the commenter’s request. However, we are not aware of an unsafe condition associated with the original Grimes anti-collision light installation. We have determined that an unsafe condition exists on WHELEN anti-collision light installations and must be addressed. If we determine that an unsafe condition exists in the Grimes anti-collision light installation, we might consider further rulemaking. We have not changed this SNPRM regarding this issue. Request To Reference the Revised Service Information

NetJets Aviation requested that we revise the NPRM to refer to revised service information for the actions specified in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM). NetJets Aviation stated that all service information identified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(7) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) have been revised.

We agree that this SNPRM should refer to the most current service information. We have changed paragraph (g) of this proposed AD to refer to the revised service information. We have also added a new paragraph (h) to this proposed AD to provide credit for actions done ‘‘before the effective date of this AD’’ using the originally referenced service information. We have redesignated subsequent paragraphs accordingly.


### 39599 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

Additional Change Made to This SNPRM

We have retitled table 1 to paragraph (c) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) to figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this proposed AD to meet the requirements of the Office of the Federal Register. This change is for formatting purposes only. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This SNPRM

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type designs.

Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM. Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this SNPRM affects 778 airplanes of U.S. registry.

We also estimate that it would take about 12 work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $801 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $1,416,738, or $1,821 per product. Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2015– 3629; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM– 011–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date

We must receive comments by August 1,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs

None. (c) Applicability

This AD applies to Dassault Aviation airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD.



### F IGURE 

### 1 TO 

### PARAGRAPH 

### (C

### ) OF 

### T HIS 

### AD—Applicability

Airplanes Configuration 1 Except airplanes modified through:

Dassault modification embodied in production Service bulletin in service

Dassault Aviation Model

MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes. M1853 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F50–241. 2 M2083 or M3094 ............. Dassault Service Bulletin F50-257.

Dassault Aviation Model

MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes. 3 Group 1: M1682 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900–182. M5381 ................................ Not Applicable.

4 Group 2: M1682 is embodied in production or in

service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900–182 and Modification M1947 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900–176. M5386 ................................ Not Applicable.

Dassault Aviation Model

FALCON 900EX airplanes. Group 1: M1682 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–025. M5381 ................................ Not Applicable.

Group 2: M1682 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–025 and Modification M1947 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–19. M5103 or M5386 ............... Not Applicable.


### 39600 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules

F IGURE 

### 1 TO 

### PARAGRAPH 

### (C

### ) OF 

### T HIS 

### AD—Applicability —Continued

Airplanes Configuration 1 Except airplanes modified through:

Dassault modification embodied in production Service bulletin in service

Dassault Aviation Model

FALCON 2000 airplanes. M331 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–44. M810 or M1061 or M2778 Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–111. Dassault Aviation Model

FALCON 2000EX airplanes. M1802 is embodied in production. ................................ M810 or M1061 or M2778 Not Applicable.

1 The excluded airplanes, as specified in figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD—Applicability, embody either one modification in production or one service bulletin in service, as applicable.

2 Modification M2083, Dassault Service Bulletin F50–257, Modification M1947, Dassault Service Bulletin F900–176, Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–19, Modification M5103, as applicable, introduce fin tip SATCOM fairing, in production or in service.

3 Group 1: Airplanes with WHELEN anti-collision light located on top of vertical fin tip.

4 Group 2: Airplanes with WHELEN anti-collision light located on top of air intake engine No. 2.

(d) Subject

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 33, Lights.
(e) Reason

This AD was prompted by a report of anin-flight lightning strike to the WHELEN anticollision light located on the top of the vertical fin tip that caused severe damage and resulted in the loss of some airplane functions. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of electrical power and essential airplane functions, and possible reduced control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
(g) Modification

Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify the anti-collision light bonding, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(7) of this AD.

(1) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, Revision 1 (also referred to as 481–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(2) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900–372, Revision 1 (also referred to as 372–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(3) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin F900–378, Revision 1 (also referred to as 378–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(4) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–285, Revision 1 (also referred to as 285–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(5) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–305, Revision 1 (also referred to as 305–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(6) For Model FALCON 2000 airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–337, Revision 1 (also referred to as 337–R1), dated January 26, 2015.

(7) For Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX–108, Revision 1 (also referred to as 108–R1), dated January 26, 2015.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions

This paragraph provides credit for actions required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(7) of this AD. This service information is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(1) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 50 airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, dated August 22, 2007.

(2) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 900 airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900–372, dated August 22, 2007.

(3) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 900 airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin F900–378, dated September 19, 2007.

(4) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes with the WHELEN system installed on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–285, dated July 18, 2007.

(5) For Model FALCON 900EX airplaneswith the WHELEN system installed on the Sduct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–305, dated September 19, 2007.

(6) For Model FALCON 2000 airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–337, dated July 25, 2007.

(7) For Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX–108, dated July 25, 2007.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1139. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, dated January 15, 2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–3629.

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http:// www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call

425–227–1221.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3,

2016. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14290 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**