alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Tofutti Brands Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Steven Kass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven Kass*
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2008

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
#### Ex parte Hubert George CULPEPPER.

No. 28005.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1955.

¡No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an ordér of the Judge of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas. County refusing to discharge the appellant under a writ of. habeas corpus and remanding him to the custody of the sheriff of said county.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 15.1

[ON ERNST & YOUNG LLP LETTERHEAD]

September 18, 2003

Stockholders and Board of Directors

Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation pertaining to the2003 Stock Option Plan of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation of our review reports dated May 21, 2003 and August 20, 2003 relating to theunaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation that are included in its Forms 10-Q for thequarters ended May 4, 2003 and August 3, 2003.

Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

September 18, 2003
#### Charles T. LAKE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29239.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 18, 1957.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Steve Preslar, Rankin, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated.

A supplemental transcript has been forwarded to this Court which contains a photostatic copy of the complaint originally filed in this cause. It is now apparent that the same was not copied correctly in the transcript furnished this 'Court originally, and our opinion reversing this conviction because of a fundamental defect in the complaint is now withdrawn.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompanies the record, and nothing is brought forward for review.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934







Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

November 20, 2006





PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)



|001-07572                | 13-1166910                          
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification Number)



200 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016(Address of Principal Executive Offices)



Registrants telephone number (212)-381-3500

Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)











---



ITEM 2.02

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

On November 20, 2006, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company), issued a press release to report the Companys 2006 third quarter earnings, which is set forth in the attached Exhibit 99.1.

The information in this Form 8-K and the Exhibit attached hereto shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



ITEM 9.01

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(d)  Exhibits.

|Exhibit | Description                            
|------- | ---------------------------------------
|99.1    | Press Release, dated November 20, 2006.











---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION



By: /s/ Bruce Goldstein

Bruce Goldstein

Vice President and Controller



Date: November 20, 2006
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-54854, 33-75102 and 33-89004) pertaining to the 1991 Stock
Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-54856) pertaining to
the 1991 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-9466, 33-11244, 33-30345, 33-34598, 33-34599, 33-34600,
33-40614 and 333-69109), pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1982 Stock
Option Plan and the 1986 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-69109) pertaining to the 1991 Nonemployee Directors
Stock Option Plan and the 1991 Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreements, and the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 33-78718, 333-69107,
333-40678, 333-16879 and 333-29823), of our report dated July 28, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of IntelliCorp, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 2000.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
September 27, 2000
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- GSC Construction, Inc. Under Contract No. W91236-10-D-0064 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58658, 59724

James S. DelSordo, Esq.

Argus Legal, PLLC Manassas, VA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Jonathan R. Bryant, Esq. Carlton A. Arnold, Esq. Nicole E. Angst, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Corp ofEngineers, Louisville ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthe appeals having been settled, the appeals are hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within six months ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: 28 February 2017

MICHAEL T. PAUL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 58658, 59724, Appeals of GSC Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
| **GENERAL Warehousing and Distribution (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 3 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Warehousing and Distribution [Line Items]**                              |           |   |
| Warehousing and Distribution Expense                                       | $ 58.3         | $ 57.5 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Warehousing and Distribution Expense
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_WarehousingandDistributionExpense**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
[Line Items] for Warehousing and Distribution [Table]
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pvh_WarehousingandDistributionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**pvh_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 24, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 14 32 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 4 :0 6- cr-0 00 55 -RH–W CS-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ERIC LYNN, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J un e 2 4, 2 01 1) Befo re BARKETT, PRYOR an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:Gwend ol yn S pi ve y , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Eric Ly nn inth is ap pe al , has m ov edto wit hd raw fro m fur th er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d h as fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And

er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d 49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of t he en ti re re co rdrev eal s t ha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andLy nn ’s rev oc at io n o f supe rv is edrel eas e an d re su lt in g s en te nc e are AFFIRMED .

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Henry M. Funderburk, the Executive Vice President of Darlington County Bank, the
only and  wholly-owned  subsidiary of Darlington  County  Bancshares,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  the closest equivalent to a chief financial officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1.   This  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     June 30,  2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in this Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date:  August 12, 2003

                                    /s/ Henry M. Funderburk
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Henry M. Funderburk
                                    Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350,  is not  being  filed as part of the  Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document, and may not be relied upon by anyone for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Darlington  County  Bancshares,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by
Darlington County Bancshares,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 3(ii)
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
BY-LAWS
OF
COMM BANCORP, INC.
 Article 1
REGISTERED OFFICE
   Article 2
SHAREHOLDERS MEETINGS
     58




---



##### 



Article 3
QUORUM OF AND ACTION BY SHAREHOLDERS
  Article 4
VOTING RIGHTS
  59




---



##### 



Article 5
PROXIES
  Article 6
RECORD DATE
  60




---



##### 



Article 7
VOTING LISTS
  Article 8
JUDGES OF ELECTION
  61




---



##### 



Article 9
CONSENT OF SHAREHOLDERS IN LIEU OF MEETING
  Article 10
DIRECTORS
 th
    62




---



##### 



Article 11
VACANCIES ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  Article 12
POWERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  63




---



##### 



Article 13
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
      64




---



##### 



Article 14
INFORMAL ACTION BY THE BOARD OR COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS
  Article 15
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
  Article 16
OFFICERS
    65




---



##### 



Article 17
THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
   Article 18
THE PRESIDENT
  Article 19
THE VICE PRESIDENTS
  Article 20
THE SECRETARY
  66




---



##### 



Article 21
THE TREASURER
  Article 22
ASSISTANT OFFICERS
  Article 23
CERTIFICATED AND UNCERTIFICATED SHARES
   67




---



##### 



Article 24
TRANSFER OF SHARES
  Article 25
LOST CERTIFICATES
  Article 26
DIVIDENDS
   68




---



##### 



Article 27
FINANCIAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
  Article 28
INSTRUMENTS
   Article 29
FISCAL YEAR
  Article 30
SEAL
  Article 31
NOTICES AND WAIVERS THEREOF
  69




---



##### 



Article 32
INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
   70




---



##### 



71




---



##### 



Article 33
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
   72




---



##### 



73




---



##### 



74




---



##### 



75




---



##### 



Article 34
AMENDMENTS
  Article 35
EMERGENCIES
  76
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132254 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132254 COA: 260153 Berrien CC: 04-403553-FH MIGUEL C. LUNA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
#### CITY OF CATLETTSBURG et al., Appellants, v. R. L. MURPHY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 17, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1955.

Thomas E. Phipps, Diederich' & Lycan, Ashland, Peck, Shaffer & Williams, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.'

*821MOREMEN, Judge.

This appeal is from the Boyd Circuit Court, contesting that court’s judgment dismissing the City of Catlettsburg’s consolidated petitions against several property owners. The City sought to collect appor-tionate costs for street improvements from the adjacent property owners and, if necessary, the sale of their property to satisfy liens purportedly perfected by proper statutory steps. Certain bondholders intervened and prayed for the sale of the property to satisfy their bonds issued by. the City to underwrite the improvements. These petitions were also dismissed.

The question is whether the City of Catlettsburg effected the proper steps pursuant to the statutes, then in force, requisite to impose street paving liens. The trial court held it had not.

There is in the record a voluminous exhibit filed by the appellant City in the lower court as a part of the several petitions purporting to contain copies of the various ordinances, signed by the proper officials, necessary to perfect street paving liens.

The appellees introduced the City Clerk of Catlettsburg who testified, in substance, that other than the ordinances authorizing the street improvements and the report of the committee approving the completed improvements, there was nothing in ■ the official ordinance book which evinced that the City assessed, by ordinance, the property owners pursuant to a city engineer’s report on the apportionment of cost, required by statute. There was some attempt to show through the same witness on cross-examination that in some instances ordinances were typed on separate sheets and placed loose in the ordinance book, rather than copied on the book pursuant to the usual custom.

Nevertheless appellants did not produce the original ordinances and. failed to establish their actual existence and passage by any evidence of substance..

With this state of the record before him, the court held in part:

> “The record of the City discloses the absence of practically every essential thing required by the statute to impose a lien for street paving * *

We believe the court correctly held that the City failed to meet the burden of proof. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
CalAmp Corp. and Subsidiaries

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-98981 and 333-119858),  Form S-4 (No. 333-112851) and Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-31427, 33-36944, 33-72704, 33-60879, 333-33925, 333-93097, 333-
114873 and 333-119842) of CalAmp Corp. and subsidiaries of our reports dated
May 11, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of CalAmp Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended
February 28, 2009.


SINGERLEWAK LLP

/s/   SINGERLEWAK LLP

Los Angeles, California
May 11, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          Name                                          State of Incorporation
                          ----                                          ----------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>
Subsidiaries Incorporated in the United States:
-----------------------------------------------

  C/P Products Corp.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      Indiana

  United Sales & Warehouse of Texas, Inc. . . . . . . . .                      Texas

Foreign Subsidiaries:
---------------------

  The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc. . . . . . .                      Quebec, Canada
</TABLE>

-------------------
*   In accordance with the descriptions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item 601
    of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted those subsidiaries that, if
    considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
    significant subsidiary as of December 31, 1995.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-2714 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-SW-052-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Helene Gandy Date

Branch Manager Date
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 

DECEMBER 31, 2006 OF WORLDSPACE, INC. 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of WorldSpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

1.     The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, (the “Form 10-K”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2.     The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: April 17, 2007 

/s/ Noah A.Samara                    

Noah A. Samara 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President 

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as partof the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
kodk-ex103_16.htm



 

Exhibit (10.3)

SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

The Eastman Kodak Company 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended effective May 22, 2018 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows, effective

February 20, 2019:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 6.7 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows:
	
 




“6.7Individual Limitations. No Employee may be granted Options or Stock Appreciation Rights covering in excess of 2,500,000 Shares in any calendar year (with tandem Options and Stock Appreciation Rights being counted only once with respect to this limit), subject to adjustment as provided in Article 14 hereof.”

*****