alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## U.S. Governmental Advisory Committee

2012

- 2014 Membership Roster

Octaviana V. Trujillo , Ph.D.

, CHAIR

Tribal Council Member Pascua Yaqui Tribe Flagstaff, Arizona

Alejandro M. Rodarte Assistant Secretary for Border Affairs

California Environmental Protection Agency Sacramento, California

Edna A. Mendoza

Director Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Office of Border Environmental Protection Southern Regional Office Tucson, Arizona

Ginny Broadhurst

Executive Director

Northwest Straits Commission Mount Vernon, Washington

Katherine L. Gajewski Director of Sustainability City of Philadelphia Mayor’s Office of Sustainability Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Dale G. Medearis, Ph.D.

Senior Environmental Planner

Environmental & Planning Services Northern Virginia Regional Commission Fairfax, Virginia

Cristina Viesca

- Santos, J.D. Assistant County Attorney El Paso County Attorney’s Office

Environmental Crimes Unit El Paso, Texas John M. Bernal Deputy County Administrator Pima County Public Works Administration Tucson, Arizona

Salud Carbajal First District Supervisor County of Santa Barbara Santa Barabara, California

Kirk V. Cook Supervisor Washington State Department of Agriculture Olympia, Washington

T herese H. Goodmann Assistant City Manager City Manager’s Office City of Dubuque, City Hall Dubuque, Iowa

Carlos Rubinstein

Commissioner Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Austin

, Texas

Roger Vintze Manager Enforcement and Emergency Response Program California Department of Toxics

Substances Control El Centro, California

Gerald Wagner

Environmental Director Environmental Program

Blackfeet Nation Tribe Browning, Montana
#### Odis MATHIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28164.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

*954No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon his plea of guilty, before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling an alcoholic beverage, to-wit, beer, in a dry area, on two separate counts, on each of which his punishment was assessed at a fine of $125, totaling $250.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Steven Kass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Tofutti Brands Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  June 22, 2004

/s/Steven Kass*
---------------
Steven Kass
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1111; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-147-AD; Amendmen

39J.~b7! AD 2010_*9.~*1(J0

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2CI0 (Regional Jet Series

700,701 & 702), CL-600-2Dls (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional

Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwoItt

f

l hiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to i, entify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes thl unsafe condition as:

During an elevator Power Control Unit (peU) Centering Functional

Check on two CL-600-2CIO aircraft, sustained os¢illations were ,

discovered when a control rod was disconnected. These sustained

oscillations could render the elevator surface inop~rable and cause

subsequent loss of pitch control of the aircraft.

<+1*),0-

tmNG'YMBOl

- / l1tJ

ROlITlN ,YMllOl

ROlIT[NG SYMllOl

n.•••.•••• 'G

• • • • • • •

UTING SYMBOl

Loss of pitch control could result in reduced controllabilif of the airplane. We are

issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
14910-13-1"

DEPAlnMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

({"L1'J<Rl-~,_-,._<

"""'l>IGS\""""'.

.'NE-l71

14 CFR Port 39

••,,'E

(Docket No. FAA-2009-1111; Dircdor.ltc Identifier 2009-NM~147-AD; Amcndmcnl39- 03/J-3

."""-"'''"'s'''''' LGl3/AEG

R1N 2120-AA64

Airwor1hiucss Dirtctivcs; Bombardier, me., Model CL-600~2CIO (Regional Jet Series

700,701 & 702), CL·600-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), aL CL-600-2D:!4lRegional

Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Adminislration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

At.'TI.oN: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We arc adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed

I

above. This AD results from mandatory contil1lling airworth"ncss information (MeAl) ,

originated by an aviation authority of another country to ide tify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product The MeAl dcscrib(::s the U lSl.Ife condition as:

During an elevator Power Control Unit (peU) Cente ing Functional

Check on two CL·600~2C I0 aircraft, sustained ascii ations were

discovered when a control rod was disconnecled. Th~sc sustall1cd

oscillations could render tJ1C elevator surface inopcr1~blCand cause

subsequent loss of pitch control of the aircran.

.. '" .. '" .•. .•. ""

Loss of pitch conlrol could result in reduced controllability of the airplam:. We are

I

issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on the~e products.

~o~.,,"----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,746
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,679
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,895
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        128,708
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,587
<DEPOSITS>                                     157,435
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,919
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,090
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 175,587
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,929
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  827
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   319
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,075
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,098
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,977
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      840
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     16
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          10
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### H. P. WILLOUGHBY, Appellant, v. Harry B. MILLER, Jr., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1957.

■Denney & Landrum, Lexington, for appellant.

Harry B. Miller, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant H. P. Willoughby questions the allowance of an attorney fee in the sum of $300 to the appellee, Harry B. Miller, Jr. The allowance was made after the mandate was entered in Willoughby v. Willoughby, Ky., 294 S.W.2d 550, a divorce action. The record in the divorce case discloses that a fee of $1,500 was allowed for itemized services rendered in the lower court. The $300 allowance is for services performed subsequently and on appeal.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         34,857
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,972
<PP&E>                                         1,694,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                 338,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,465,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79,479
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12,608
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               960
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               718,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (954,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (956,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (956,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2008 (the "Form
10-KSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: October 29, 2008                        By: /s/ Thomas V. Geimer
                                              Thomas V. Geimer,
                                              Chief Executive Officer,
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

   CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge,
based upon their review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, of Southern Community Bancorp (the "Report"), that:

         (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
                  material respects the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods
                  presented in the Report.



Date: August 7, 2003                        /s/  CHARLIE W. BRINKLEY, JR.
                                         ----------------------------------
                                              Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr.
                                         Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                             and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 7, 2003                        /s/  STEPHEN R. JEUCK
                                         ------------------------------
                                                  Stephen R. Jeuck
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### LeRoy DUNLAP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28646.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

' Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, two years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and: nothing is presented for review. The'judgment is affirmed.
**BANX
      AND GREEN GROUP, INC.**


**NOTES
      TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**





EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Beere Financial Equity Corp., Inc.
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies,, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      such officer’s knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of Section 15(d)
      of


the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
      dates
      indicated.





In
      accordance with the Exchange act, this report has been signed below by the
      following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
      the
      dates indicated.





/s/
                STEVE LANE
            
            President,
                Chief Financial officer and Director November 24, 2008Steve
                Lane
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1952 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1952

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify the deadline for 
    filing a claim seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or 
      approval issued by a Federal agency for a highway or public 
        transportation capital project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2011

Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Graves of Missouri, 
and Mr. Westmoreland) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition 
  to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify the deadline for 
    filing a claim seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or 
      approval issued by a Federal agency for a highway or public 
        transportation capital project, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEADLINE FOR CLAIMS RELATING TO HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC 
              TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 139(l) of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``180 days'' in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) and 
inserting ``90 days''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to claims arising after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20530

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO CANTU-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:89-CR-204-3

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Cantu-Rivera, now federal prisoner # 49017-079, appeals an order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3) for

remission or modification of the $1,000,000 fine imposed when he

was sentenced. The criminal judgment is final. Because the

criminal judgment did not call for payment of the fine in install-
No. 04-20530

-2-

ments, 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3) is not applicable. The order,

accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                CONSENT OF INDEPEDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Supertex. Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-43691) of our report dated April 23,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Supertex, Inc. as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and for
the year ended March 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
June 16, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL 

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 479 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL 

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 480 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL 

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 481 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court
[479 MAL 2023, 480 MAL 2023, 481 MAL 2023 and 482 MAL 2023] - 2

PINNACLE AMUSEMENT, LLC,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL 

ENFORCEMENT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 482 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.