alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 15, 2007

Ms. Rosemary Conrad-Sandoval

Roerig, Oliveira & Fisher, L.L.P.

10225 North 10th Street

McAllen, TX 78504

Mr. Scott T. Clark

Adams & Graham, L.L.P.

P.O. Drawer 1429

Harlingen, TX 78551-1429

Honorable Arnoldo Cantu Jr.

Judge, Hidalgo County Court #5 

100 North Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

RE:Case Number:  06-0878

Court of Appeals Number:  13-06-00458-CV

Trial Court Number:  CL-05-3167-E

Style:IN RE  ALLSTATE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND DAVID GONZALEZ

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0878Page 1**
Exhibit 32

			CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
			SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004. The undersigned hereby
certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 30, 2005                             /s/Raul S. McQuivey
Date        	                       ____________________________
						     Raul S. McQuviey
                                         Principal Executive Officer




March 30, 2005                             /s/Sidney C. Hooper
Date                                     ____________________________
						     Sidney C. Hooper
                                         Chief Financial Officer
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WESLEY RICKS NO. 

### 2023 KW 0824 

### OCTOBER 23, 2023
In Re: 

### Wesley Ricks, applying 

### for supervisory writs, 

### 20th

Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 

### 16259. BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, 

### ANDWOLFE, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator 

### failed to include a 

### file -

stamped copy of the " Petition 

### for a Writ of Habeas Corpus", 

### the State's response, 

## if any, and any other portion of the district court record that might support the claims raised 

### in the writ application. Therefore, 

### this court cannot adequately 

## reviewthe rulingat issue herein. Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application 

### for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2-18.7 & 4-9. In the event relator elects to 

### file a new application with this court, 

## he maydo so without 

### the necessity of 

### obtaining a return date. 

## Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, the 

## missing itemsnotedabove, and acopyofthis ruling. JEW GH EW

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN FLORES, AKA Juan Flores, Jr., 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-73089 

Agency No. A090-214-113 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2022

San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ,**

District Judge. Dissent by Judge VANDYKE

Juan Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him removable and denying his applications for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

FILED

AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

asylum and withholding and deferral of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). We review de novo questions of law. Cerezo v. Mukasey, 

512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008). We grant the petition for review and remand.

Flores was charged with removability solely because of a conviction under 

California Penal Code (“CPC”) § 136.1(b)(1). On remand from this Court after a 

prior petition for review, the BIA held that Flores was removable because the CPC 

§ 136.1(b)(1) conviction was an offense relating to obstruction of justice under 8 

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S), and thus an aggravated felony. In Cordero-Garcia v. 

Garland, we held that CPC § 136.1(b)(1) is not an aggravated felony under 

§ 1101(a)(43)(S). No. 19-72779, 2022 WL 3350714, at *6 (9th Cir. Aug. 15, 

2022). Thus, the sole charge of removability against Flores cannot be sustained and 

his petition must be granted.

We remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this order. 

See Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181, 1184 (9th Cir. 2004) (“In reviewing the 

decision of the BIA, we consider only the grounds relied upon by that agency. If 

we conclude that the BIA’s decision cannot be sustained upon its reasoning, we 

must remand to allow the agency to decide any issues remaining in the case.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
3 

VANDYKE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. 

For the reasons set forth in my dissent in Cordero-Garcia v. Garland, No. 19-

72779, 2022 WL 3350714 (9th Cir. Aug. 15, 2022), I dissent in this case as well. 

FILED

AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Exhibit 31

                   Certifications Under Rule 13a-14(a)/l5d-14(a)


  I, Henry C. Pao, certify that:

  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Supertex, Inc., a
  California corporation;

  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this annual report;

  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

  4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and I have:

    (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
    being prepared;

    (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
    control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
    fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
    to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

  5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
  over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
  equivalent function):

    (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize, and report financial information; and

    (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.


June 16, 2004                      /s/ Henry C. Pao
                                   -------------------------
                                   Henry C. Pao, Ph.D
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                   Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1   Wings & Things, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wings & Things, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wings & Things, Inc.   Date: May 11, 2009/s/ Greg L. Popp
Greg L. Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
I)0r-O^T'2JOOB- f^/2© 

DELTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 

ADMINISTRATION OFFICE 

310 LUDINGTON STREET 

ESCANABA, MICHIGAN 49829 

PHONE: 906-789-5100 

FAX: 906-789-5197 

O 

April 8,2010 > ^"^3 

CD 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis Room 6401 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

This communication is regarding the Essential Air Service to the Delta County Airport 

located in Escanaba and allowing us the opportunity to comment. 

The Delta County Board of Commissioners at their regular meeting held April 6, 2010 

reviewed the bid offers for the Delta County Airport made by four bidders. The Board moved to 

support the bid option #3 from Mesaba d/b/a Delta Connection. In choosing to support the option 

3 bid, the board is considering consistency and continuity for our community, as well as the record 

Delta Connection has in increasing local passenger boardings and their on time/cancellation 

performance. The Board feels through Delta Connection services to Detroit and Minneapolis the 

residents of Delta County will enjoy access to an established air provider. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely your^. 

Thomas C. Elegeert, Chairman 

Delta County Board of Commissioners 

Delta County is an equal opportunity provider and employer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 179

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement 
  that certain former members of the reserve components of the Armed 
 Forces be at least 60 years of age in order to be eligible to receive 
                         health care benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the requirement 
  that certain former members of the reserve components of the Armed 
 Forces be at least 60 years of age in order to be eligible to receive 
                         health care benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF THE AGE REQUIREMENT FOR HEALTH CARE BENEFITS 
              FOR NON-REGULAR SERVICE RETIREES.

    Section 1074(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1)''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
RE: Updated Boiler MACT Preamble/Rule

Mary Johnson to

:

Higgins, Cortney

Cc

:

RobertJ Wayland, Jim Eddinger

From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Wednesday, 10/17/2012 5:15 PM

Cortney,

Per your request as part of the interagency review process, attached in support of the final 

reconsideration action for Area Source Boilers is the technical memo "Beyond-the-Floor Technology 

Analysis for Mercury." There are no other new or updated technical memos supporting the final action. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Mary

Area Source Boilers_Hg BTF Memo_2012_05_22.docx 

Mary Johnson

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Mail Code D 243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-5025

Fax: (919) 541-5450
EXHIBIT 32.1

THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2008

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, hereby certifies that: (i) the Annual Report of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on Form 10-K with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information
contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | /s/ JAMES MUSBACH                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|                     |  | James Musbach                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|                     | 
|                     |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and will be retained by The Coast Distribution System,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### D’UNGER et al. v. TIMON.

No. 12616.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Aug. 12, 1953.

Jerry D’Unger, Patrick J. Horkin, Jr., Corpus Christi, for appellants.

T. H. Burruss, Allen Wood, Luther E. Jones, Jr., Corpus Christi, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

By order dated March 3, 1953, the trial court dismissed this cause. On March 6th, appellants filed a motion to set aside the order of dismissal. This motion was not acted upon within forty-five days after the same was filed and was accordingly overruled by operation of law on April 20th, Rule 330(j), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The court’s attempted action of April 28th, relating to the motion, was wholly ineffective. The appeal bond was not filed until May 26th, more than thirty days after April 20th, and this Court is consequently without jurisdiction of the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. Rule 356, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Marlon PATTERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28167.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1956.

*950G. C. Harris, Greenville, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $200.

The complaint appears to be sufficient but the information upon which appellant was convicted is fatally defective in that it fails to designate or name appellant or any other person as having committed the offense, nor does it allege that the name of the accused is unknown.

Art. 414 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. (4) requires that an information “contain the name of the accused, or state that his name is unknown and give a reasonably accurate description of him.”

There being a valid complaint upon which a new information naming the accused may be presented, the prosecution will not be dismissed. See Simmons v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 252 S.W.2d 711.

Because of the insufficiency of the information, the judgment is reversed and. the cause is remanded.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kosan Biosciences
Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |